Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 04.03 City Coucil Regular Agenda PLEASE FILL OUT A"RE( ST TO SPEAK"FORM IF YOU WISH TO ADDF0KS THE COUNCIL AT CALL TO THE PUBLIC OR ON ANY NON-PUBLIC HEARIN( cM ACH _ o City of Apache Junction Home of the Superstition Mountains APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 EAST SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85219 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA April 3, 2012 7:00 PM A. CALL TO ORDER. B INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. C. ROLL CALL. D CONSENT AGENDA. The Council may,at this time,take single action on any or all items listed as consent agenda items.These items may include, but are not limited to,acceptance of agenda,acceptance of minutes, appointments, acceptance of resignations and adoption of certain resolutions and other items which do not require a public hearing The Consent Agenda is a timesaving device of which the Mayor and City Council is to receive documentation on these items from the City Manager for their review prior to the meeting.Any member of the Council may remove any item from the Consent Agenda for discussion and cause a separate vote on the matter later in the agenda. 1 Acceptance of Agenda. 2. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 20,2012. 3. Resolution No. 12-10: A Resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction,Arizona, Honoring Veterans and the Active Duty Services of the United States of America By Creating a Display of Flags to be Located at the Northwest Corner of Apache Trail and North Apache Trail This resolution confirms and memorializes the city council direction of March 20,2012. E. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS. Awards,presentations from other organizations, proclamations issued by the mayor,and acknowledgement of distinguished guests and visitors,and staff presentation of receipt of grant or donated funds are permitted at this time. 4 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 11 -17,2012 AS"NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATION WEEK." National Public Safety Telecommunication Week recognizes telecommunicators for their outstanding service and commitment to public health and safety. F. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CURRENT EVENTS. The Mayor or any member of Council may at this time present a brief summary of current events However, no discussion shall take place on such items except for clarifying comments related to substance,time and location. G. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT. The City Manager, members of City staff or those individuals designated by the Manager may present information pertinent to items under consideration or information related to the operation of the City There shall however be no discussion at this time except for clarification inquiries 5• MANAGER'S REPORT. H PUBLIC HEARINGS. Public hearings required by applicable law shall be conducted by the Council and any person shall be given the opportunity to speak All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. Such remarks shall be limited to five(5)minutes unless additional time is granted by the Mayor This time limitation shall not apply to applicants and their agents appearing before the Council 6 Consideration of Ordinance No 1380,amending Apache Junction City Code,Volume I,Chapter 12,Traffic, Sections 12-3-8, Handicapped Parking and 12-5-7, Schedule of Sanctions; repealing any conflicting provisions;providing for severability,and providing for penalties. On March 19, 2012,staff presented council with a draft ordinance that would change the city's handicapped parking law to allow the court to consider legitimate excuses for failure to place the required placard,thereby allowing the$300 00 sanction to be reduced to no less than$50 00 in qualified circumstances Approval of Ordinance No. 1380 will modify Apache Junction City Code, Volume I, Sections 12-3-8 and 12-5-7 accordingly 7 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.1381, REPEALING,AMENDING AND READOPTING SECTIONS 1-16-19-C, 1-16-1P" AND 1-16-19-E ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STORAGE SHEDS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ZONIN. CODE, REGARDING HEIGHT,SIZE AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. Approval of Ordinance No. 1381 would amend the City of Apache Junction Zoning Code regarding size,height and design requirements for accessory buildings located within the R1-43, R1-43/MH and R1-43/PD zoning districts On January 10,2012,the Planning Zoning Commission recommended City Council approval of a similar ordinance by a 4-3 vote 8 DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1382, REPEALING TOWING SERVICES ORDINANCE NO. 885 IN ITS ENTIRETY, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. On March 20, 2011,the Mayor and City Council awarded bids to four tow companies and directed staff to prepare an ordinance repealing Ordinance No 885,which set forth the towing services regulations that have been in place since 1994 Approval of Ordinance No. 1382 will repeal Ordinance No 885 with an emergency clause. t• OLD BUSINESS. The Council shall consider any business that has been previously considered and which is still unfinished to include those items previously postponed or tabled No member of the public shall be permitted to speak on these items unless invited to do so by the Mayor after first submitting a written request-to-speak form with the City Clerk None J. NEW BUSINESS. The Council shall consider any business not yet considered No member of the public shall be permitted to speak on these items unless invited to do so by the Mayor after first submitting a written request-to-speak form with the City Clerk None K COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF. This item allows the Mayor and City Council to direct staff on specifically listed matters None. L SELECTION OF MEETING DATES, TIMES, LOCATIONS, AND PURPOSES: 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5.45 P M AND WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. FOR MONDAY,APRIL 16,2012 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5.45 P M FOR TUESDAY,APRIL 17,2012.OTHER MEETINGS IF NECESSARY. M. CALL TO PUBLIC. At this time the public has the privilege to address the Council with requests,communications,comments or suggestions relating to City business that are not listed on the agenda All speakers must have already submitted a written"Request to Speak"form to the City Clerk no later than the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda If there is a group speaking on the same item,they should select a spokesperson.All such remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof The Mayor is authorized to ask a speaker to stop speaking and leave the podium or to adjourn the meeting if anyone becomes disorderly,uncivil, makes personal attacks or continues to speak about items that are not within the jurisdiction of the city after being warned such issues are beyond the jurisdiction of the city to act The Council may not answer questions of the speaker,discuss the matter with one another,but may,at the conclusion 1) respond to criticism by a speaker;2)ask the City Manager to review a matter,3)ask the City Manager to place the matter on a future agenda Each speaker must approach the podium,speak into the microphone,provide their name and address There is a three(3) minute time limit per speaker N. ADJOURNMENT. "` Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the City Clerk's office 300 East Superstition Boulevard,Apache Junction,AZ Monday through Thursdays,7 OOa—6 OOp,excluding holidays. If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation,please notify the Human Resources Office,at (480)474-2617 or(480)983-0095(TDD)at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled time CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 20, 2012 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on March 20, 2012, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Insalaco called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. INVOCATION Councilmember Wilson gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Smithson led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present : Mayor Insalaco Vice Mayor Dietz Councilmember Barker Councilmember Serdy Councilmember Smithson Councilmember Wilson .•. (There is one vacancy on the council . ) Staff Present : City Manager George Hoffman Assistant City Manager Bryant Powell City Clerk Kathleen Connelly City Attorney Joel Stern Public Safety Director Jerald Monahan Others Present : Business Advocate Janine Solley Sergeant Clyde Allison Captain Arnold Freeman Building Official Dennis Dixon REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 1 OF 23 Senior Planner Rudy Esquivias ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Vice Mayor Dietz MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 12-05, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE ARIZONA CHILD ABDUCTION RESPONSE TEAM, BE APPROVED. Councilmember Smithson SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE: Unanimous . The motion carried. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS None. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CURRENT EVENTS Councilmember Wilson announced the Black Stallion Literacy Program is now called Horse Tales. They will have first graders from 7 schools attend at the rodeo grounds on Saturday morning. Councilmember Wilson commented they had the antique tractor show here two weeks ago. It was a great weekend with record attendance. Councilmember Wilson commented he attended a horse and carriage show in Coolidge last weekend. It was larger than our event a month ago, attracting people from all over the world. He believes the city has the opportunity to attract something like that here. CITY MANAGER' S REPORT City Manager George Hoffman requested Assistant City Manager Bryant Powell show a news video on local community groups REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 2 OF 23 keeping their local state parks in existence that focused on Lost Dutchman State Park. He then commented on an award Superstition Harley-Davidson had won, the household hazardous waste collection the city had last weekend, an article in a Maricopa newspaper mentioning the Apache Junction marquee sign, an article in a local paper on the Apache Junction Mock Trial Team, articles in Gateway to the East Valley that featured the city downtown area and the Superstition Mountain Museum and an article in the March edition of the East Valley Times on odd jobs which featured Apache Junction' s Tess Nesser and her role at the Renaissance Festival . PUBLIC HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE EAST VALLEY - APACHE JUNCTION BRANCH City Clerk Kathleen Connelly briefed the council on the item. Mayor Insalaco requested the applicant address the council. Mrs . Sandie Smith, representing the Boys and Girls Club, addressed the council . She stated the event will be at Dolce Vita on Goldfield. It will be a masquerade ball . They will have lots of surprises . They will be supplying security and all the people serving the liquor are trained. They will be meeting with staff to see if they need any crowd control . Mayor Insalaco opened the public hearing on the item. There being no one wishing to speak, he closed the public hearing and reopened the item to council discussion. There being no further discussion, he called for a motion. Councilmember Barker MOVED THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE EAST VALLEY - APACHE JUNCTION BRANCH FOR APRIL 21, 2012, SUBMITTED BY LAURIE ARMSTRONG, BE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 3 OF 23 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL. Vice Mayor Dietz SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE: Unanimous . The motion carried. OLD BUSINESS AWARD OF BID FOR TOWING SERVICES Public Safety Director Jerald Monahan briefed the council on the item. Captain Arnold Freeman gave a presentation on the request for proposal tow contracts, the process and requirements, an overview of the bids received and the staff recommendations . Councilmember Wilson asked why Phoenix Metro did not meet the state requirements . Captain Arnold Freeman stated Phoenix Metro does not meet or exceed the Arizona Administrative Tow Regulations R-13 . They also do not meet or exceed the requirements of RFP PD 2011-03 . Failure to meet Arizona R-13 Regulations and the RFP requirements is based upon agent, owner, operator, employee felony criminal history. Disclosure is prohibited by Arizona State and U. S. Federal Statutes . Felony criminal history includes violations specifically prohibited in �. Arizona Administrative Regulations R-13-3-1201-A Section 7 . Councilmember Barker commented last night they discussed Priority Towing not meeting our RFP requirements . She asked that he explain the reasons . Captain Arnold Freeman stated they do not meet or exceed the requirements of the RFP because they do not have an office on site The RFP submitted by Priority states "Priority Towing does have an office on its primary storage facility. It is currently occupied by a tenant REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 4 OF 23 but will be taken over by Priority Towing in November of this year. " That is taken directly from their RFP document . Those statements are contradictory to each other. They cannot have an office, say it is occupied and that they will take it over. He cannot say what will happen in the future. He can only say what happens when this RFP was turned in. When the RFP was turned in they did not have an office on site. Additionally, in Exhibit B Section 3 Item 6, the bid states "in April 2012 Priority Towing .\ will expand into office on site for vehicle releases, currently leases property adjoining office for vehicle storage and utilizes home office for records, phones, etc. " They are saying April 2012 and November He has two different dates to work with. Councilmember Barker commented neither one states they are open at the time of this bid. Captain Arnold Freeman stated that is correct. Councilmember Barker commented she understood there was a problem with the building that was going to be used as an office . Captain Arnold Freeman stated that is correct . It does not meet the commercial requirements . Councilmember Barker asked why that is . A. Building Official Dennis Dixon stated the Office of Manufactured Housing regulations for alternative forms of housing state that office is substandard. It is not intended to be an office building. It does not meet building codes for an office building. Councilmember Barker commented Housing and Urban Development has created a standard and this particular building meets the residential standards but not the business or office building standards that they have to meet . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 5 OF 23 Building Official Dennis Dixon stated actually they created a lesser code for an alternative form of housing. It does not meet the current codes as adopted by the City of Apache Junction for a standard residence and definitely not for an office. Vice Mayor Dietz asked if they could go through this whole thing this evening, and if it would be possible to modify, add, subtract or change something in the future if the council wishes to do so. City Attorney Joel Stern commented he thinks he is saying that if they make a vote and pick so many tow companies and then something comes up in the industry that is not good for the tow industry, such as the price of diesel being $15 . 00, what would happen with the contract . He thinks he is asking if they can change the contract . Vice Mayor Dietz commented basically. City Attorney Joel Stern stated the contracts can be changed. He recommended that if they do pick a certain amount of firms that they get the contracts executed and they would have to get rid of Ordinance No. 885 by repeal . They could then see how the contract is going with the industry and how it is working out with the city. Vice Mayor Dietz commented his main concern was if it could be done in the future. City Attorney Joel Stern stated contracts can be changed. Councilmember Barker commented about having to go out to bid for any changes. City Attorney Joel Stern stated if there are significant modifications because of the industry or economic conditions, there is a clause in here that could be modified by mutual agreement . It is not to avoid another request for proposal. It is in case there is something REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 6 OF 23 significant that essentially does not work for everybody, such as they are not getting the service they need or the tow industry is really feeling the pinch on certain financial issues . If they feel it is extreme enough, they can modify the contract . Vice Mayor Dietz commented it is not to change the terms in the request for proposal, it is to ,r change the terms in the contract if needed. He wants to be able to do that in the future. City Attorney Joel Stern stated they can do that but they are not going to do it the day after the contracts are signed. Vice Mayor Dietz commented he was not expecting to do it the next day, just some time in the future if needed. City Attorney Joel Stern stated they can. Mayor Insalaco asked if the mileage is in or out of this proposal . Captain Arnold Freeman stated the mileage is not figured because they went with a $20 surcharge and a fuel surcharge after a $4 . 01 per gallon trigger. The reason being is because the majority of our tows are in a populated area towards the western part of town close to the focal point east on Apache Trail . The industry would recover .,.., more of their expenses from the surcharge then they would on a mileage figure, unless they would allow a $10 per mile mileage figure. Mayor Insalaco commented the mileage question keeps coming up. Captain Arnold Freeman stated even if they charge $5 per mile and they had to pull 3 miles that is $15 . At $3 50 per gallon, they are automatically getting a $20 bonus . When $4 . 01 kicks in, which it already has, REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 7 OF 23 they get 5% added to an $80 tow bill if it is a one hour simple tow. Mayor Insalaco called for any further discussion. There being no further discussion, he called for a motion. Vice Mayor Dietz MOVED THAT THE FOLLOWING TOW COMPANIES BE SELECTED AS THE CITY' S TOWING SERVICES PROVIDERS : AND THAT WOULD BE C.L KING TOWING, BURKE' S TOWING, ACTION TOWING AND RANDALL' S TOWING; AND I MOVE THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OBTAIN EXECUTED COPIES OF TOWING AGREEMENTS WITH THE SELECTED COMPANIES; AND I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY DRAFT AND PRESENT A MEASURE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 885 WITH AN EMERGENCY CLAUSE AT THE APRIL 3 REGULAR SESSION. Councilmember Barker SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE: Unanimous . The motion carried. NEW BUSINESS None. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF PUBLIC ART FOR THE OLD WEST HIGHWAY MEDIAN ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Business Advocate Janine Solley briefed the council on the item. Councilmember Barker commented there are cost estimates on the silhouettes . She asked if any of the money was budgeted. Business Advocate Janine Solley stated there was no money specifically for art . They did REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 8 OF 23 budget $10, 000 when they prepared a budget a little over a year ago with an idea that the "AJ" city logo could be something they might incorporate into one of the pedestals at Idaho. Councilmember Barker commented there is one small silhouette of a javelina which is estimated at $2, 756 . It is something to keep in mind that they do have a beginning with that grant and the estimated costs . .•� They have the monies for that beginning. Vice Mayor Dietz commented he thinks she got the gist of what they were discussing last evening. Councilmember Serdy asked if Councilmember Barker was saying to use the grant money to buy the javelina outright. Councilmember Barker commented they could go ahead and do this and get started. Vice Mayor Dietz commented they could get the first one in. Councilmember Barker commented that from that point they would go to the possibility of asking staff to go out throughout the artists' community and see if they are willing to sponsor and raise funds for additional art for the median. Councilmember Serdy commented �. the javelina is the coolest of the three. Councilmember Barker commented it seemed like since they had a funding opportunity for this, it would get them started and then have staff do as Councilmember Serdy suggested and go out and see what interest there is out there in doing this . Councilmember Serdy commented he wanted to discuss a little bit and then make a motion. Last night the vice mayor initiated the subject of an arts council . Rather than be city-appointed and have all the burdens of that, REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 9 OF 23 he suggested it would be easier to have a group of outside volunteers . They already have one here locally called Superstition Arts and Cultural Alliance. Once they got going, it could even grow larger as there are a lot of people that do not know about SACA. It could encourage more people to come out . Vice Mayor Dietz commented they have done a wonderful job thus far. Councilmember Serdy commented if they do this right, they could set this for years to come. He advised he will be ready to make a motion once the discussion is completed. He would like to talk positively. Nick is a wonderful artist and you can see it in everything he does . They love it . If they give Nick these tools, he will put them in the right place and highlight them. He added Nick Blake is the landscape artist who works for the city. He is very talented. If they have him do every piece and the city buys them, it stunts the growth of wanting to participate. There are plenty of opportunities for Nick to design other things around town. He believes the javelina is Nick' s . Business Advocate Janine Solley commented it was actually a parks and recreation project . There were many involved. Councilmember Barker commented it was a group project. She thinks if they could get a start and then go out to the artists they could then see what happens . It will not hurt to ask them if they would be willing to do that and see what kind of vehicle they can put together to make this work. Vice Mayor Dietz commented it is a wonderful idea . He encouraged Councilmember Serdy to put as far as getting started with the javelina into his motion since we do have the grant funds for it . It is a beginning and will show our commitment. There was general discussion on the motion and whether two were needed. It was determined there would be one motion combining the two thoughts . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 10 OF 23 Mayor Insalaco closed the discussion with no further comments and called for a motion. Councilmember Serdy MOVED THAT STAFF LOOK INTO HAVING CITY COUNCIL APPOINT THE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION SUPERSTITION ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE TO ACT AS THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION' S ART COUNCIL; THAT SACA TAKE DIRECTION FROM THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REGARDING PUBLIC ART — PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION; THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS LAST REFUSAL RIGHTS ON ANY PUBLIC ART PROJECTS; THAT SACA, AS THE APACHE JUNCTION ART COUNCIL, WILL TAKE ON THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ISSUE CALLS TO ARTISTS FOR PUBLIC ART, INTERVIEW ARTISTS, REVIEW SUBMISSIONS AND MAKE FINAL SELECTIONS FOR PUBLIC ART, OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM CITY COUNCIL ON ALL ART SELECTIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING TO MAKE ANY PURCHASES OF ART SELECTIONS; ONCE ART SELECTIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, SACA WILL ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY TO RAISE FUNDS NECESSARY TO PURCHASE THE APPROVED ART SELECTIONS, BE IT GRANTS, DONATIONS, FUNDRAISING, ETC. ; ONCE FUNDING HAS BEEN ARRANGED SACA WOULD THEN PURCHASE THE ART SELECTIONS, DONATE THE ART TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION. ONCE DONATED THE ART WOULD BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION WHO WILL THEN BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE. Councilmember Barker stated she had a problem. She asked how she could stop the motion. City Attorney Joel Stern asked Councilmember Serdy if he was done with the motion. Councilmember Serdy commented .•. he was going to add that they proceed with this one. He commented at the beginning it was to look into this . City Attorney Joel Stern stated the mayor called for a motion but there is no second yet . Councilmember Smithson stated he will second it if there is one modification. Rather than they will he would like to see they would be authorized to in each case. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 11 OF 23 Councilmember Serdy commented in the beginning it says that staff will look into it . Councilmember Smithson stated he then said the organization would do this and do that . He would feel more comfortable if they were authorized by the city council to proceed with those things. Councilmember Serdy commented ,— it said that a couple of times during the motion. Councilmember Barker commented we cannot do this . Councilmember Smithson asked where it said that a couple of times. City Attorney Joel Stern commented he heard a second. Vice Mayor Dietz commented no one seconded the motion. Councilmember Smithson stated he would second if. He did not second anything yet . City Attorney Joel Stern commented the first part of this was the motion to appoint SACA. If that happens, that becomes an open meeting issue. Vice Mayor Dietz commented that is what they discussed last night . City Attorney Joel Stern stated they have discussed it a bunch of times . He wants them to know that is out there in the motion and it will entail some staffing, open meeting issues, agendas and notices . He wanted to point that out. Councilmember Serdy asked if the word appoint is the problem. Councilmember Barker commented she thinks there are other problems here . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 12 OF 23 City Attorney Joel Stern commented they could say ask, but he would still see it as an appointment trying to get around the open meeting law. He does not know what his intent is . If they want to create a new commission, then that is what that does . Councilmember Serdy commented they already exist . They would just be using them or .•. recognizing them to do this work for the city. City Attorney Joel Stern commented the way it is stated is they become kind of like our planning and zoning commission or the board of adjustments . Councilmember Barker commented that is not what they talked about anyway. They did not talk about SACA by themselves they talked about the art community. They did not specify a particular organization in our discussion. That completely goes off the track of what they discussed. Councilmember Serdy commented they are already in place. They are up and running. He does not see the point of having them disband and regroup again. Councilmember Barker commented they first have to see if they get a second on this since there is a motion on the table. Vice Mayor Dietz commented it has not been seconded and they can amend it . Councilmember Barker stated they cannot discuss it until the motion is dropped. Councilmember Serdy continued his motion with IN THE MEANTIME THEY COULD USE FUNDING ALREADY AVAILABLE TO PROCEED WITH THE JAVELINA PIECE PART. Councilmember Smithson asked if there is any way to use a word like authorize or recognize or anything else like that . He asked if they would all do the same thing. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 13 OF 23 Am. ,... City Attorney Joel Stern stated he believes their intent is to have SACA essentially take a look at the item and make a recommendation to the council. That is what it sounds like. There is nothing wrong with that, but if they want them to become their commission on art, then the way Title 38 is it says that if they create a commission or appoint someone, as they are not having the city manager appoint someone or this group, the council is doing it. Councilmember Serdy commented the Chamber of Commerce works as our Visitor Center. They did not appoint the Chamber of Commerce and they are not our commission. City Attorney Joel Stern stated that is true but they do have a contract with us . They do not necessarily make recommendations that the council would act upon except outside of the contract. Councilmember Serdy commented there are three fail safes where if it does not go the way the council likes then the council has the right of refusal . If it is approved all three times, they would then proceed. City Attorney Joel Stern stated there is one way to keep this just for donations and not involving city funds . He is not sure that is what his intent was . He asked if these were city-funded and donations or just donations . Councilmember Serdy commented there would be no city funds other than installation and ... maintenance. Councilmember Smithson asked if it would work to authorize the city manager to do all those things . Vice Mayor Dietz asked for the opinion of the city clerk. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated if they proceed with this motion they will create a de REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 14 OF 23 facto commission and the language is similar to what the planning and zoning commission does . They make recommendations . To her it would be an end run around the open meeting law unless SACA wanted to comply with everything. They would have to create a website to post their agendas and all those things . The meetings would have to be open to the public. Mayor Insalaco commented he ..►. said the city manager could do this. City Attorney Joel Stern stated the city manager could be directed to meet with SACA and then provide recommendations through the city manager. Vice Mayor Dietz asked if that would be creating a commission. City Attorney Joel Stern stated it would not because they are not selecting a body. They are directing the city manager. Councilmember Smithson commented that would make it a staff matter. Councilmember Barker commented but it is with a specific body. In essence, they have selected a body. City Attorney Joel Stern stated the statute talks about the council selecting a particular other body. By their directing the manager, and the manager meets with SACA, it does not mean his meetings with SACA have to be open to the public or agendas kept or notices done. Councilmember Smithson commented it is a staff situation rather than a formal organization. City Attorney Joel Stern stated it is a staff communication. He does not do that with all of this staff communications with other entities . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 15 OF 23 Councilmember Serdy commented these submissions were created with a similar type commission. Councilmember Barker commented these actually came through parks and recreation through a city-appointed commission. City Attorney Joel Stern stated some cities appoint the parks and recreation commission �. to look at the art . Some of the larger cities do that . He commented if they are uncertain and that is what the council would like to do, the council could continue this one more time. Staff now has a better idea of what they want to do. Mayor Insalaco commented he thinks they know what they want to do. Councilmember Barker commented she has nothing against SACA. She has a great amount of respect for that group. However, in the discussions over the last several weeks the council has talked about the artists' community. Those are the words that we have used over and over again. There are artists that are not a part of SACA who might also be interested. By limiting this to a group rather than opening it up to the artists' community, she thinks they are not doing what the council has discussed. By telling anybody on staff to talk to a specific organization is just as good as designating that organization. It is just going around the back door. She believes the community artists are those that should be asked. If SACA turns out to be the group that says it will take it on, that is great . But then they have volunteered to take it on. The council has not asked anyone to talk specifically to them. Councilmember Serdy commented that is in the motion. It says that SACA will issue a call to the artists for public art. Councilmember Barker commented they are talking about two different things here. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 16 OF 23 .�aAlsw Councilmember Serdy commented the art may not come from SACA. They will be doing the legwork and the fundraising. Councilmember Barker commented he is naming a specific organization to do this . Councilmember Serdy commented a they will be looking into it. He asked for a short recess . Councilmember Barker commented they cannot discuss this off the public agenda. It has to be discussed here. Councilmember Serdy commented they cannot discuss it as a quorum but they can take a recess to rewrite a new motion. Councilmember Barker commented they can take a recess to rewrite a new motion and she is positive that Joel would be delighted to help him as he is the lawyer. Mayor Insalaco asked what the pleasure of the council is . City Clerk Kathleen Connelly suggested they keep moving forward. It could be a generic motion that the city manager convenes the appropriate staff to come back with something that is all inclusive of the arts community and spend the $2, 000 on the javelina. Mayor Insalaco commented Kathy just made the motion. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated if they wanted to take a break that might be the direction they might want to go in. Vice Mayor Dietz commented they should get a second on the motion before them now, vote on it and then come back and they can do another motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 17 OF 23 Councilmember Barker commented it failed for lack of a second. There was general discussion as to whether the motion had failed for lack of a second. It was determined by consensus that the motion had failed. City Attorney Joel Stern stated he recommends they continue this for two weeks, come back and he will meet with the city manager. Mayor Insalaco commented he likes that the best . City Attorney Joel Stern stated they will try to come up with some language that hopefully meets it . They have worked on this thing for a long time. Councilmember Barker commented for too long. Mayor Insalaco commented another two weeks is a killer. He called for a motion. City Attorney Joel Stern stated to come up with something in the next ten minutes will not work. City Manager George Hoffman asked if he could ask a clarifying question of Councilmember Barker He understands in the abstract the concept of the arts community. He asked what it looks like operationally to her. For example if she says go out and reach out to SACA he will go over and talk to Sharon. When she says to talk to the arts community, he asked who that is . Councilmember Barker commented whoever contributes artwork to this community and paints etcetera. There are people all over the community. She asked if they could do a call to artists in the paper and have a meeting of those artists and present them with what the council wants to do. They would like to see a group of artists take on REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 18 OF 23 this project and raise the funds for the project. They would be on their own and recommend to the council or bring examples to the council to help build the median. If the only person who shows up is Sharon, then yea, but there are other people. City Manager George Hoffman stated for someone to receive funds they have to be set up organizationally. Councilmember Barker agreed and commented that will also have to come up in the meeting. City Manager George Hoffman stated they will probably have to have some type of tax designation status and a variety of things that at a pragmatic level would seem to indicate that they need to be an organization of substance. Councilmember Barker commented they need to be a part of SACA so SACA grows . She is trying very hard not to exclude people in the community who are not a part of SACA but are, in fact, artists . Rather than appointing a specific organization, if they have a group come in and say they would love to do this, they would be told they have to be a 501 (3) C, which they are not, but SACA is and maybe they could join them. City Manager George Hoffman stated that helps him to understand more fully and at an implementation level just what her objective is . He thinks Kathy' s motion would be okay and it would send staff back and they would have a starting point with dialogue. Sharon is here and is hearing their objectives and interests . Staff could talk with them on how to implement that, get the project rolling, get started and get some movement, pursue that longer term arrangement and see what solution comes back. They could have a board discussion with the council . It is their call . Councilmember Barker stated she would feel better doing that then just putting this aside for two weeks as they will be coming back in two weeks with basically the same thing and a couple of more ideas in two weeks . If they do what the city manager is talking about, he REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 19 OF 23 will come back with some answers and some concrete things and possibly there is not another artist in this community. There was general discussion on a motion. Councilmember Barker MOVED THAT THE FOLLOWING DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF REGARDING ART ON THE OLD WEST HIGHWAY MEDIAN ENHANCEMENT PROJECT: THAT STAFF QUERY THE ART COMMUNITY TO DISCOVER THE INTEREST IN TAKING ON PROJECTS FOR FUTURE MEDIAN ART WORK AND RAISING FUNDS THEMSELVES FOR THOSE PROJECTS; AND THAT WE BEGIN OUR PROJECT BY USING THE $2, 000 GRANT MONEY TO PUT OUR JAVELINA UP IN THE ALREADY LANDSCAPED MEDIAN AT THE PEDESTAL OF NICK BLAKE' S CHOICE. Vice Mayor Dietz SECONDED THE MOTION. Councilmember Barker stated it is basically what Councilmember Serdy said without putting a name on it. Councilmember Smithson asked if this will involve a lot of staff time. Councilmember Serdy asked if this is something they are looking into and exploring Councilmember Barker commented they will be exploring it Councilmember Serdy commented �.., that is what he wanted to do. Councilmember Barker commented she simply did not name SACA but named the whole art community instead. It leaves the door open to anybody that is interested. Mayor Insalaco called for the vote . VOTE: Unanimous . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 20 OF 23 The motion carried. SELECTION OF MEETING DATES, TIMES, LOCATIONS, AND PURPOSES Vice Mayor Dietz MOVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5 : 45 P.M. AND A WORK SESSION AT 7 : 00 P.M. BE HELD ON MONDAY, APRIL 2, 2012, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, RESPECTIVELY; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5 : 45 BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2012 IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM. Councilmember Barker SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE: Unanimous . The motion carried. CALL TO THE PUBLIC: Mr. Elliott Fisher, 547 E. Quail, Apache Junction addressed the council regarding the art work for the median, the status of his medical marijuana referendum, and his promotion of the independent movement in Apache Junction. Mr. Dennis Walter, 5525 N. Wolverine Pass Road, Apache Junction, addressed the council to thank the public works department and the police department for the tremendous amount of help given during Lost Dutchman Days and the memorial for Gary Mulholland. He also provided a picture of the mayor in the skybox. Mr. Darryl Cross, 1018 N. Acacia Road, Apache Junction, addressed the council regarding his opposition to any changes to the R-143 district regarding any outbuildings except for forbidding Quonset huts and the misrepresentation of the petitions regarding those changes . Mr R E. Eck, 1125 S . Cedar, Apache Junction, addressed the council regarding a softball tournament at Prospector Park last Saturday. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 21 OF 23 Mr. Terry Secor, 1285 N. Main Street, Apache Junction, addressed the council regarding his earlier confusion on the mileage rate for the towing contracts but the explanation given this evening answered his questions . Mr. Bo Randall filled out a request to speak form but he had already left . Councilmember Serdy thanked R. E. Eck for his involvement in all these community tournaments over the years . Councilmember Barker commented there were at least 1, 000 people attending the softball tournament . Councilmember Wilson commented he has encouraged businesses to put up information on what is available in the community for those people attending events . ADJOURNMENT Mayor Insalaco adjourned the meeting at 8 : 15 p.m. Consent Agenda Items are as follows: 1 . Acceptance of Agenda. 2 . Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 6, 2012 . 3 . Consideration of approval of Resolution No. 12-05, authorizing the City of Apache Junction to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the Arizona Child Abduction Response Team (CART) . ACCEPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2012, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2012 . JOHN S . INSALACO Mayor REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 22 OF 23 ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk ... CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, held on the 20th day of March, 2012 . I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present . Dated this 26th day of March, 2012 . KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk A . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 2012 PAGE 23 OF 23 ACJ! � 1L.,zy of Apache Juncion Home of the Superstition Mountains at Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Kathy Connelly, City Clerk DATE: April 3, 2012 Agenda Type : Regular Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Additional Item Outside Scope of Identified Council Priorities TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: Resolution No 12-10 A Resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Honoring Veterans and the Active Duty Services of the United States of America By Creating a Display of Flags to be Located at the Northwest Corner of Apache Trail and North Apache Trail ACTION REQUESTED: Recommendation for Approval DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This resolution confirms and memorializes the city council direction of March 20, 2012. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: .RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download L] cover memo d Resolution No. 12-10 � t. ,11 „i • _. _ I' DATE- March 20, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers MEMORANDUM THROUGH George Hoffman, City Manager MEMORANDUM FROM: Bryant Powell, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT. Resolution No. 12-10, Permanent Display of Flags For a number of years, the "Trail of Flags" have been present along Apache Trail at various designated times during the year. With recent Apache Trail median improvements, in addition to diminishing staff resources, a concept was introduced to the City Council on February 21, 2012 that would seek to create a permanent home for the flags at the NW corner of Apache Trail and North Apache Trail, At the February 22, 2012 City Council meeting, staff received formal direction to proceed with the concept and prepare a Resolution that formalizes the new location and outlines the practice of which flags are to be flown. Staff respectfully requests consideration of Resolution No 12-10. and recommends approval of this item. - �► ... RESOLUTION NO. 12-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, HONORING THE VETERANS AND THE ACTIVE DUTY SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY CREATING A DISPLAY OF FLAGS TO BE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF APACHE TRAIL AND NORTH APACHE TRAIL. WHEREAS, in 2000 the Mayor and City Council established a temporary Trail of Flags to fly the United States flag along Apache Trail within the city limits on select days of the year; and WHEREAS, in 2001 and 2004 the Mayor and City Council expanded the original temporary Trail of Flags by adding additional dates and flags representing each of the states; and WHEREAS, throughout all of these actions the Mayor and City Council were aware that future improvements to Apache Trail could result in the discontinuing of the temporary Trail of Flags; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council wish to establish a permanent display of flags honoring our veterans and the branches of the active duty services of the United States. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the temporary Trail of Flags be discontinued and replaced with a permanent display of seven flagpoles to be relocated at the northwest corner of Apache Trail and North Apache Trail and that these flagpoles fly the flags of the United States of America, the State of Arizona, the U.S. Army, The U.S. Marine Corps, The U.S. Navy, The U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Coast Guard and be in compliance with State law regarding the display of the Prisoner of War/Missing in Action flag. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 2012. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2012. JOHN S. INSALACO Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 12-10 PAGE 1 OF 2 ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. r, 3.aola RICHARD J. STERN City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 12-10 PAGE 2 OF 2 ROLL CALL VOTE NOTES . /../7 1 01l ITEM # MEETING OF 49/ jg-1 4)4A)\ MOTION BY SECONDED BY I YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMEMBER WILSON COUNCILMEMBER SERDY J VICE MAYOR DIETZ \././ COUNCILMEMBER BARKER 1/1// COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON MAYOR INSALACO UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS NO. 1-3 I MOVE THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO 12-10, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, HONORING THE VETERANS AND THE ACTIVE DUTY SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY CREATING A DISPLAY OF FLAGS TO BE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF APACHE TRAIL AND NORTH APACHE TRAIL, BE APPROVED ACN E*ago io of Apache junction Home of the Superstition Mountains l• za�F Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Jerald L. Monahan, Chief of Police DATE• April 3, 2012 Agenda Type . Regular Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING APRIL 11 - 17, 2012 AS "NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATION WEEK " ACTION REQUESTED: DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION. National Public Safety Telecommunication Week recognizes telecommunicators for their outstanding service and commitment to public health and safety. FISCAL IMPACT: OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download D Proclamation-Telecommunication Week NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK APRIL 8th-APRIL 14th,2012 WHEREAS, the entire community can appreciate and recognize the professional 9-1-1 Telecommunicators who have impacted the lives of many,and WHEREAS, a group of professionals who are responsible for our nation's first- line Homeland Security on a daily basis;and WHEREAS, admire the professionals who have dedicated their lives to helping others by answering the call every single day and bearing tremendous responsibility, and WHEREAS, during this week, all over the nation, ceremonies will be held and Telecommunicators will be recognized for their outstanding service and commitment to public health and safety;and WHEREAS, the dedication,hard work, anger, frustration,tears and smiles that go on every day,one call at a time,making the world a better place;and WHEREAS, appreciating the skills they bring to every emergency call no matter how serious or trivial which keeps our officers and the public safe, and WHEREAS, our country's Telecommunicators and 911 professionals are dedicated to meeting the technological demands placed upon them in our rapidly changing world even if it means making personal sacrifices during these troubled times,and WHEREAS, Telecommunicators are the behind the scenes heroes who make the difference in the lives of others, NOW, THEREFORE, I, John Insalaco, Mayor of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,do hereby proclaim April 8th—April 14th,2012 as NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK in Apache Junction and urge our fellow citizens to show their appreciation by calling the Police Department and thanking the Telecommunicators for their commitment to you and your family They are the voice of comfort and compassion serving you 24 hours a day 7 days a week Signed and attested to this day of ,2012 JOHN INSALACO Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk ' iy of Apache Junci;on Home of the Superstition Mountains krzo14r' M Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: George Hoffman, City Manager DATE: April 3, 2012 Agenda Type : Regular Agenda Council Priority Focus Area. TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: MANAGER'S REPORT. ACTION REQUESTED: DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION• FISCAL IMPACT: OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download No Attachments Available PUBLIC HEARING /'1 1. For PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1380,AMENDING THE CITY CODE, TRAFFIC, SECTIONS 12-3-8 HANDICAPPED PARKING AND 12-5-7 SCHEDULE OF SANCTIONS 2. Will CITY ATTORNEY JOEL STERN speak to the Council? 3. Will the applicant or spokesperson please speak to the Council on this item? 4. Is there anyone from the public who wishes to speak on this item? (Are there any "Request to Speak" forms?) 5. If not, this hearing is closed. 6. Is there any discussion? 7. Call for a motion. 8. Call for a second. 9. Roll call vote. PCN o� 1 `gat► .-k o CZty of Apache Juncizon Home of the Superstition Mountains 1 z.104 1M Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: R. Joel Stern, City Attorney DATE: April 3, 2012 Agenda Type : Regular Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Public Safety TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Ordinance No 1380, amending Apache Junction City Code, Volume I, Chapter 12, Traffic, Sections 12-3-8, Handicapped Parking and 12-5-7, Schedule of Sanctions, repealing any conflicting provisions; providing for severability, and providing for penalties ACTION REQUESTED: Recommendation for Approval DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On March 19, 2012. staff presented council with a draft ordinance that would change the city's handicapped parking law to allow the court to consider legitimate excuses for failure to place the required placard, thereby allowing the $300.00 sanction to be reduced to no less than $50 00 in qualified circumstances Approval of Ordinance No. 1380 will modify Apache Junction City Code. Volume I, Sections 12-3-8 and 12-5-7 accordingly. FISCAL IMPACT: --OPTIONS/ ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: Approval. ATTACHMENTS: Click to download ❑ Ordinance No. 1380 ❑ Staff Report ORDINANCE NO. 1380 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, VOLUME I, CHAPTER 12, TRAFFIC, SECTIONS 12-3-8, HANDICAPPED PARKING AND 12-5-7, SCHEDULE OF SANCTIONS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES . WHEREAS, on April 6, 2010, the Mayor and City Council adopted comprehensive amendments to Apache Junction City Code ("A.J.0 C. ") , Volume I, Chapter 12, Traffic; and WHEREAS, staff has indicated that it is experiencing a high number of civil trial settings due to the disabled parking regulations being enforced pursuant to A. J.C.C. § 12-3-8, Handicapped Parking; and WHEREAS, the minimum civil sanction set forth in A. J.C.C. § 12-5-7 for parking in a handicapped parking space is $300. 00 with no ability for the court to lower the amount, even if a removable placard was displayed but accidentally fell off the vehicle' s rear view mirror; and WHERAS, on January 3, 2012, staff sought council direction regarding a change in the code that would provide the court the ability to take into consideration legitimate excuses for failure to place the required placard, thereby allowing the $300. 00 sanction to be reduced to no less than $50. 00 in qualified circumstances; and WHERAS, council directed staff to make the appropriate changes . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS • SECTION I IN GENERAL I . That the Apache Junction City Code, Volume I, Chapter 12, Traffic and Parking, Section 12-3-8, Handicapped Parking, be renamed and amended to read as follows : § 12-3-8 DISABLED PERSON PARKING. (A) No person shall stop, stand or park any vehicle in a parking space set aside and identified for use by persons with physical disabilities only unless the vehicle has a ORDINANCE NO. 1380 PAGE 1 OF 4 license plate which depicts an international wheelchair symbol issued by the Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-2409, as amended, or has a removable windshield placard displayed on the front rearview mirror which depicts the international wheelchair symbol as issued by the Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles pursuant to A.R. S. § 28-2409, as amended. (B) Subsection (A) above shall apply only to those parking spaces that are identified with standard signs and/or markings as approved by the City Engineer located on public or private property II . That Apache Junction City Code, Volume I, Chapter 12, Traffic and Parking, Section 12-5-7, Schedule of Sanctions, be amended to read as follows : § 12-5-7 SCHEDULE OF SANCTIONS. (A) The sanctions listed in the following schedule are the minimum sanctions that may be imposed by the Apache Junction Municipal Court or other court, should the case be transferred thereto, for violations of the articles of the city code listed below, except that in cases involving violations of Apache Junction City Code, Volume I, § 12-3- 8, the court may, on the first issuance of a citation, reduce the minimum sanction to $50. 00 upon being shown proof or otherwise reasonably believing that the violator had a removable windshield placard but either forgot to place it or it fell out of sight of the enforcing officer. (B) Any person violating any of the provisions of this code other than those specified in the following schedule shall be liable for the imposition of a civil sanction not to exceed $250. 00. City Description Initial Sanction Sanction Code Sanction When Paid When Section When Within 8 Unpaid Paid - 30 After 30 Within 7 Calendar Calendar Calendar Days Days Days 12-3-1 Parking more than 18 $30. 00 $60 00 $120. 00 inches from curb. 12-3- Blocking traffic $30 00 $60 00 $120 00 2 (A) ORDINANCE NO. 1380 PAGE 2 OF 4 12-3- Blocking a public or $50. 00 $100. 00 $200. 00 2 (B) private driveway or entrance to an alley. 12-3- Parking where $50. 00 $100. 00 $200. 00 2 (C) prohibited or restricted by official signs . An bk 12-3-3 Parking adjacent to $30. 00 $60. 00 $120 . 00 schools where prohibited by signs 12-3-4 Parking contrary to $30. 00 $60 . 00 $120 . 00 posted angle, 1-way or prohibited/restricted parking signs . ` ` ` 12-3-5 Parking on a $50. 00 $100. 00 $200 . 00 sidewalk, or in the area between the curb and the sidewalk. 12-3-6 (A) Parking an abandoned $50. 00 $100 . 00 $200 . 00 vehicle on a street or other public property. 12-3-7 (A) Stopping, standing or $100 00 $200. 00 $300 . 00 parking in a fire lane. 12-3-8 Parking in places $300 . 00 $400. 00 $500 . 00 reserved for the physically disabled. 12-3-9 Parking over-sized $50. 00 $100 . 00 $200 . 00 p vehicles in residential areas 12-3-10 Parking an unattended $50. 00 $100. 00 $200 . 00 vehicle on a roadway. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the codes adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. ORDINANCE NO. 1380 PAGE 3 OF 4 SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the codes or regulations adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES Violations of Apache Junction City Code, Volume I, Chapter 12, shall be punishable as civil traffic infractions unless otherwise indicated in the code PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 2012 . SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2012 JOHN S. INSALACO Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk 1"1" APPROVED AS TO FORM. RICHARD J. STERN City Attorney ORDINANCE NO 1380 PAGE 4 OF 4 To• Mayor,City Council and City Manager From: James Hazel, Presiding Magistrate Date: February 27, 2012 Subject Changes in the Parking Ordinance As you are aware,the City of Apache Junction recently began to enforce handicap parking violations During the course of this enforcement it was determined that the city ordinance did not allow for the reduction in fines for those who may have violated the ordinance but in fact have a valid placard Acting under City Council direction,the City Attorney has redrafted the ordinance to allow for a reduced fine for those violations where a person has a placard but did not have it displayed at the time of the violation. The Municipal Court supports the changes in ordinance as proposed by the City Attorney as it helps resolve these cases short of a contested hearing If you have any questions this issue, please do not hesitate to contact me r ROLL CALL VOTE NOTES: 1)Vc1/1f 3I �' ITEM # MEETI G OF v Cr\rj MOTION BY ,� IYAl SECONDED BY / YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR DIETZ COUNCILMEMBER WILSON ✓ COUNCILMEMBER BARKER ✓ COUNCILMEMBER SERDY V✓COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON � MAYOR INSALACO UNANIMOk'JS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE NOTES: /�„ qp 'I vf\ATC ITEM # MEETING OF I MOTION BY: L� SECONDED BY ' YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMEMBER BARKER COUNCILMEMBER WILSON COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON VICE MAYOR DIETZ COUNCILMEMBER SERDY MAYOR INSALACO UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 6 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1380 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (Call upon the city clerk to read Ordinance No. 1380 by title only Majority vote required) I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO 1380, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, (BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED) OR(BE DENIED) I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO 1380, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS. APgCN�� o • 2na Li( C ri ity of Apache Junction 4firzC,4. Development Services Department To. Mayor and City Council From Brad Steinke, Director of Development Services Date. April 2, 2012 RE• Petition Regarding Proposed Ordinance 1381 Attached you will find two sets of petitions that I received this morning regarding proposed Ordinance 1381 This ordinance is scheduled for public hearing Tuesday night The first set includes 73 signatures of property owners located outside of the R1-43 distract, whereas the second set includes 122 signatures of property owners located within the R1-43 district 300 E Superstition Boulevard • Apache Junction, AZ 851 19 • Ph (480)474-5082 •Fax 480 982-7010 P P � ) 11:_oc'EET►' o°,i,iGZS' / t66.,-rrn c,iS'(n C( Tie LI- (13 019(Ler We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email / F�5/i97 � 1 /ICe�' �4,)�e s � � �T�-t��keu)Kn�� A 1AZ J—g/cg �it)de5 ,J alev e,/-ir Lc-) l -a -�' 2 42A4 t�.-�626, r't 1 u,t.ti� J I �-.0A"' Sit'Lf/ se J ra,.,/! , R ,LX , r ,l_t • 1r, 1 ,F,e/Wil boo S /0A- a 16--ia. ee-r-fil SY0c,(/71 jrgie:/ 2„9'. y (iSO S f/i _)\ k p \1-V- G/31y5,--7;2s 6 1v42 )1' e2 I g P, Pam- pis-I� LI lit( //V RI43 C.r, ��s (2 3. Li Wes fel 4k3 ALr. UtS t w- �-- /`/3 iJ (r?-- / . --/,2_ tA./Rnc- L / , 0DNorir- (pip g N. l -1 L7`t,A7 14.j- 2 (A)a-44, It--/ AraNt Joi6 (,1/USe_i / /-Flo N iC Klcir gcl Az ay.. 6(_ _fze 004c4 a? e705:1. Co r?1 r 1rciwto '{ • 2 - c Z We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email .1;f-4 i ._ -(), 3411/0' t1 PE4gL._ A . Li 4'46/0 e// -----3S? Al---.4-- gl - , ee/C,e,--e-/ miA___- aA(Qp. '4 P� t-r4tt- $ '' S' A.,,, r 4,1 A A Z go' 2 ,,4 4:0:2 A /J an Tee) 1361 N Th hd r b� r(i ��►v� d C 4 . 4 31) 7IofMô \ DOnk, 3 Al Thund td9 ( Dream Pi i /'v grin YTht vPI--d- .0-26 u.) Can4(,)n a 71\J. en-raD,--.j I1il�. `�r. /7 � e Ise;` 2 3/'7���cf,,,,,,t,(17,,,,,,m q o, /m L�, �� .. ! L O (J - avt‘E. WooDifJ4 io(aA <i° 51-r- ,, AT 42- 1 C:7_146) Cu Ed -)-eti5 A7 �U We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email r / /4J, 51(5 6at-bao 7� �505 S, £cAooTer o'65-‘ xi), 717-2-( 4 z __5).1-2-311& 4\locavailoo,,eyypc. o,thu 0czL 533 0 A/ 6/26niD ran ,on---)zyyte; Zdzea 3120,2 hzzie I 3-5-0 yoh e o yri We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email 3yy kR/ 3-is -/1-- pl� /i C?,�'o S S��/� /c/jGr/rON42e/SF4.'..,/L /,wib:T r,�� �)��/�i- 4p, ,4 ,,, :)Th_ /- f / ,,,,,, � 3��; A), �Yl a�� C.-?--- ---72", � 3-/sue'' g--ey, 'C 7' (04e N 1P14:,-,1 p_iiii, ›,`-• diA .L,,„--(5--)2--,, gLf/,11>i,/ G- /g,s 3"02_iz.-A V J/ MNc J¢5) iiZ 3s 7/ 5 �� / / /� /� %'2 A/ i%�)4 24 .�2 W'-y 3.-,_-7 / L Al C-C) C�/7C!� 4774_1�11 N C �`L7G` � �; G l iJ r 414i 4.6 6 et"- Z_D\5 TACra,kr,4_,L_V_D 5 ,4/ ,_.._, 1 3-6---.17- ( A t)/1 /\, A-II 1 .-13 ( if4._.)---1 ka vR)kc_A_6'. siv_ad-t ccYY( ycoo 0 3-i3-= i L #014 ioe_.../ goa A. 1,--(AAA-/I-6,- "ok- A--5-"------/-/o/07 iori Cas,e r 57 3 5 E, /6.it y-4r,e,,,,,g c - 'e,d- --- Q.,M Pi.r<Al,\-\1\ 1)alit, U J .7--)) . S-t-eZ-Akpmq\maki,4 ,41\ Lik i ,, / . ..--1_17Y-67,401( bfol(/ , a'r(/1 AT 71 9 We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the RI-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email ( ---eroveu,,,q sn5c sue► .. d" C<L o rco s iv ,'rj ,Ovrieu 04.€4.ked. m,zie t o , klulcictryt44 icaidetcy , 6(ts'I 1 a "1//rf (j3 N� 1r `a7,,,L,- N- A >M4 Z ,=2-/O / (i /4-1 r%CI i 4 yv PCI , , . -r',-) , , '�,i i i a_J; bee a-g viu z S rr a, ��Cic,(y, Yv /IA, Lye) ,I,(w2, X'/7/ff.4 E-z -07U1) ,-1-,,io it, ////eze7? /7/d14 4 lid 1-ila 2,56 aS ��/y7kts#fL . 3f u 1 ,A a -' offack0 Keee7--4511,-,5116f V,t .jam d 04r, Rog o t,�,6'Ai / 7 �{c� Ai /1 PAC; l k-L CR0-4 R`\ 1%500. . 6ctfitorA) -b 5 , Gce 0 n.no (A( ''i da,,Olyil -7 I3�.�Y�z // kw$ 371 5, (21� Fhb#/ 1. 1A 6,� / U 4 z ,0 n It` e 145KJ , LOitl We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email 4 r'�.y e r{o 54 2 t.1 (01 W I1,,cl 4-kt(A P (0GS � 6 ,rZ 3 /7 - l2_ ` ff or Ile Pr i{(,C-e �s1 �r Pd a) b ( f} EJ)1 ) ' 2� ,.4,--,)3-/ -2 - ( .Z 2 '76/ !J 7e, ee .Si / _ •j- _e_,6�I ,4J /fZ e7 2 O -l�cz 4,,....--,‹7 %/7/Z f 21 Ips�-G°t 4-cf� ,. ��� i ce, & , A 2, S qZ9 i ArD, 3/Z//17 i,x‘,, vsi .7..;a7.,___ ,e52 0 Ze44:dj,z__pa-4- - -'711.7/ ' / e.e- I,d/-- ---7-----1271 - a a Ai l►-enccl f ( - D___7 -/.)____ /0(Ake,- tjaii /7 ,4/,97(// P� Wt\ r soy \\%A ' N. � � We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email Gas 6 �lw -� ji 1 /61-7.,,,o0),L, G ,0 or) 0 ,\te NR‘,,,z 1,0c1.5- (A2 GOI"-‘)--e.Le 4-A4Vpif' di,t_i 'Par (i-Cii9-SA) 11.4-1) 6rAufP), T .6)-1,011 Atti,A5 IP I 11 !' 1 8 r 0 I l i r / ,e'A . pr r/i/ � / , ♦T i --- Ar 1 . e Atre‘L., A)t--4.. �YGS S. Tchtalic,Gda ' 37 / � � 'fi!..), ro5l t" .� .. - ' c `i c_K( Jutite40(//i/ _,.,-.-4.-. 977 ,4, (20( _i___40 Qlkevoijka-- /ter , a� J / �/ , /1:f; ^ r , 4,/ - ( _ LV l e „,7,e0 / r`l (cv /j47L1/,`i( COi/ Chkc c IQ C-0 1-11' S. Cfch\-kek41 QW SA. CIVA,O., N Cibr-3P-4/1 -A c iv-Isecix..°A' L . a'vn We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email 3-(,�5ar a3a5- 5 G-e/L del l o 4/ ��_ .��.._... .� 4 b vrket c ,"�,fi b,-, .' ,4 4`' -- 3/9 L(�r� -�-___ __� Di A ir\V\€—.• g:C) 0 S. -1.-e,si:c,(iV iY\0 AP( (1)givr 74( , Mr.i/E_/7ce i@Z i A(: _ _ _- _ - ----dLtivq.,J -- ;','/ 71-e---2/X Lk).--1.5 t-i 31 '''2') 6 '2-W4-2- Alk7.7-‘"-- -C'T''''s ,,,e'"?..7 ' e- iff,,-/fa0,6 ,i‹-A cfs--4 iii/(_4/4;‘,_2 L-dtk to , 7 s, n fr 3" 47 31 1 , ..,„t //Ay/ 1\1I(&r LLL 162D S , Gf. irctc v)) 0 Ec) 4 63 1 U A i. Az. f5511at :.A,42.4,u7a- V eckt 011 e._ (4 C,0 tiut4-i I 4/ J' i��r . i 1 We the undersigned citizens representing residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the RI-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email 1 C�� /V eifrlEW /7 r ��pgcT;7;o 41,‘;94-2 �� � s���Yst givauts4 PpcpeeTV O' 1tJI2 S 1.o (A-T 77fC DIS—721C-- We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the RI-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email rcf by,ff POF/" AO Ai, 14//CeuR Ad AZ ji`ll9 f�V .3/s/2 /?Dmcvfr'e G/WA/L CCI4 7 Ca*kii)‘eio'4' 8%d A YN1 C C4Ci L2.. ( ( Pa_ 1S 5 I I W3 1 `(2- Pot( (mac Act_ Co r&/ u,15e4 (0(I N vorr A5 57/ &)"4-) / 1, jQ /5'qi -. :�r _ �� ��n � e.6-c,o`%�e i ,ti�%r Cc C b Fc)SAe C I$y I i"l GotockcIJ , 3)I&Q) I:i c r I 1 e i),l.Ci f YI 7 3 Ll(i JC} C_G f Srl oaf iv, (Di5o P • W l ckI f J�c 1 iuoAttt) PG`/C-Pt /' ? E. &ease wood sr ll yyl �G��z� 31 kP in n� �C.� (aA0( )110 l; c e.a c e w o oA sl ec% A..//, G{14 l(0 G' 6-re q ck,,o,1 5t We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name /k'1 Address Signature & Date Email 2J(a E eigrAck w o -k--- . Act:. Ik0 >E-� AP4‹-We= ;ra- A-z £3S( t 4 3 120 j t z_ 3-fr h�ni� C�J zi10 6' B rae �'`� A- g57( -3,60j/- Mouv\Q-11 CL,n . A-2 F _� '---11'pl G-I-et- ge.11 fp(-e:, --1 k(T 41-3 ..t - ------) I-K--1- it' 104(0-,(764/ i ti S-S N .^kr rto R\ �j-�Qc �r •r\ A P,,,,(:\fl c,L c o Az- g -11 c7 ' o i 6v2,1\e_C '4- rya c) . coin ( 55 N,`Zx\-r.� l� r'CkQ, 4-t i o(N c_t,��41- f\-a S l l j , fc -- - r( td-e<<P c(- Gam, c 1-, __,, / ,, /6 V'7 Arg/ e-7 z"PW11,9A .' "-)- 9&1 /0//Ai 9/-c--779 _(x '4'-,'e'C (/ (-/,-ICA.I.r-.C-( 5--Ze",e/C6', e_?)--,-7 Z °1 - , kJl -2.2.- ;2 RS%E 4(,£ L ,cc, a 14• V 1 674 _ - .cif c i Ad/n u-I--k i I ��� vna t. ( , c C �, d\1 fifiA 11-44,11 /�-P4c t TaA lc i o,�1 's i i t 3 0J_ ,'„ps'""N viJ r A1- .. We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the RI-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email ( \-- \1&C-%: 9,‘ 40 C._. Gc-er2a_5eca - -4 , ,411" al 9-6•1\e-U- Lt-7 yna_Lk_cog - 1(1- YTS Ifr-- ,a1(40 E ereaSetwetiaM- 4 ( i ' 11. 11,_PkIA Ili 4_ At c-lis I t. cem o fey/t, s )31 S f - 1 i),c.�'ir.t afee� a- bd 1 n Ati4 Verit-z-b MO-5W Cu cc Lai'PA 7 .-'' 9/2-f/gx57--______ ' omatly L° lime /9os X to?eily Kd ( = 03-- -I;- Da,rE rci /13iAl I,upfXi Q. 3- ZS. /Z.- f,cce`(a- c�(u c /c3ii4i, G�,�l i�" 4 -._ U 3-Z,/Z 2,,,,,,, 2Z, z E S,, rsJi (M42/ J he/t.,Alk 2,5 / Z— b ,an 3•1 .1-1 K _z_Z, 2 S.c,ID r5/1 III 8 I e Lr--'Z_ 3/ J/ ? ,AA 3,4S ck'e v t `tU 44_111.10ISee,Ou• 3D6 - P We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email `i-.i; 3p 51 a L.c l t �j rt 1ccr'X I&7,5 1� `:` c1i /2U £j 7 A.,,,r 1- f "C'�' _ C2 [(.0(4) (.4 f l0(i 4)a0(, 0044-] J�'q , 3 f?S/J R (S d)�.t, I(cr` e C��_ 1 .3L,�tcicQ. (; , ) s<<�( 1, 4,46-,/_ ' t 1-kc . �- y►,bke / 4ma c Jr ,f" /7-2 ski/ <u �c ��� , ( � /t?'9/,-1 A-1) 2 ei a @ , O 1 - "--t l f'ttii)re)v-e ttill) ,) i r i( / c 3/i A Gam( /', ' 414. )VZO AL 14,46 WA,1\ I.- 42' I,- d:\ i C . /1Aik2J ,4J I) l) 4/Li t IXv iaD Ilte. (,0 A \J+`5f-cl4_. 'ii Voivie -oit e `&r:N r(yir,t4, a lrato ki ViS j f) (2 1 jPa., 3 6l�/ )- 37)010- CQ6iII41UVflIo IW0 A/ Vi;1ti 2l AJ 77,0-7 f 1457c./ 5- -� /f O tw e n ,ems /Z We the undersigned citizens representing RI-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed RI-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email ROER ETiyAleT l0S:4 ThETH ACRCiA a eves r`;)yiaAY-. Rcx-,E ROTII PIOAPT@ACC ,Com uLA-h h .EhLfai-4- I d 55 N n a.Gk(D,Lo. ) ,&/i4w2-- k ielsoc,)2op/,,)s Z(0.5v E.Sul.trsi,-)/6JEW A7.y,..„5,54, a ,$).„4/41 Goy MIKE- liziss,Ns (g5Z i`\• Cx_orred3 040 li( /'9L06cips 22py/9Htic) cam eth Loojivs Ia�2 ki, G,,I df-refd koct,l ►ail apc,61NsSo0 ‘,41 _,O)0 Alan) O t:2- 2, 5 S .V,,aeLZ P ( W A o f} J 4 1 G i C.oki t/. r )---- ( i c 1,t)151A- 2D 5S 0 ecy?tc8, P Or 46---- LEI t`,i C J • tGr[G,O d�.21 (AYr✓ -4) ,v V go Fr A O L.coot , if , x .< . f 10//2 �: �/� 1/;rds&f /WI -11�.rf 4/415:2 /'-z e2/7/iraD/w,4. ���v22% We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email 3 a4,1e.„--- Q.„5 R.- 03 6.ro,,w„cs, di. /2,,,2„, ©N4 LD ,z3�2 3 e R64,SC IA/aD_b Ct,10t/e-d(yr X-3 774_ E _,ZufAce;41-°--4' ( 6,, e-ra/e7 „2. 3 N eiv-erz ayAe /2 (210 - \ A- ti ,C>(\-\e'zII A407._ We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email ZZLI vi 4-c6c,' 12� � GSc �es r e� l ii JWelk f / ' z s-r CAq‘`l, c 1 A/i�l ,„,,,, /723 A.%/ic c/ 4, / / - 3 20z- 2?#/ ssilie d'4d Cc �.. Azches C�,a-, Iv23 10 AcaC+a f1S) ,---r—_ z tali doyhc,-vOge 1 i Le. Cis,► j k a\ \I Aireil 10)3 IQ etqAtAcc laci ( . !I 4, liaiplyzi, mtorzi0A-2_16-awn.61-4 Cryv-D 1,,...:. ,\ ., -41)F 1).11 IN) . \() _2,u,,,\ D 1.) i q v v izitat,-- 171/ 661,,20, 102 5 it ' 4c, 7 Air -- 11-((-6-,c)(6, -- t,„-\_„3/2y(2,_ ' ( Na_vt n T i ;11 P5 ,Z--7 r f y'1C g-6 I ` ,- '� /l a n a_ -S. VC) cp.=k a-o coi.,v i C ki k(_ SSk A 9z 5 ti S �e e e 0 hi C S i u.0#1/ev .S6 e l,) //.`a--• 4e 71- y _.z...4,,p / AVAIL) 0 '4-le"- /O`71, A) - C__0 47-Z-'2-- -)4L-- Z/V.-0J 6 ) C_(-)\Gec\DC\EL-\ \off � C.6 v� � (? 0Q.�n �� We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email a � )/ ey 2/fib /1/ er/q g eL . Jely Ke l .2 (So N, ctaym czlieP 2l , 14ks (ace 1 c 3�z ,) o Cot02 IT I 9 04- V pAC ed . , mac! Sw ' c30 N. C-1 o ki yp;tr �u�r►�c � lick , bloWe,i( f Mari lyi Fars-coY IV 51 ce id 11 3 A5-/ ��' L� , FARRA 2 9 ° N 3 TAt R 7&L- r ca��► We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email ec, ( o: 5/Z67/2_ - CIS, L oC ( : -� 3 a, ri AL. r`1 ��acici � 2 --)A G e- L rt" t o qi A c a t,a ad !-, u y 3%z/ zvv We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email i I x yJ�n / q / �f � I `-{ b i� C e a ° (,d A0 ° A .J s AA,h/1M ,d�:,,� (Jlo,r-!/A.4„.k.) l ,(�4 1/ t 1is .-A/S 46//8 &S-z- 05-7 e & 5 W v� .€ h I /) q _ , � /WAS l o Ai k�Llk '-?E c A Il. 0,/ 9 - A I e i'i e 9 C, iii S Ar. cyin kia, i (!iison � c>s c ,$)- red_L--t-- , krfr (IA f , -, 66/Isiia . vi-, jaq 4 iii9)/k-yuy /3(5')/0 C'es-i -Ti:e_____ 4/ rir_24 at i hi_ /4 3 Ai�� v,/7 „( D Y1V le `�✓ �y�. //07 A) Cr?l. Z-� J --?coa)--)a,-261 Ivo- x Coi-kzPd &nu,. , ...k)00(Alee-itei- ingibon yeueki:eyozhze,con 4 )q,„c--S" '1 1.%,h) vv.._c,,\N_ 7 1 tAP''l I.C6 S. .--A\ ()) 1A" or a A;4-- 711,---.( U A (13),qi, s. -ir pn.,, s}-i a, ,13D II h Q Amo ,L4,...k.) We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments ecr Departments for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email UJ� “t owl Cro c r e it C 7 l N H , $v c Rd 'G4 3/. 7 9 azcl lei q i tS . &4-6 )&jl fj►Z et, ,',1 12ors< con--) 1ict\e e p-wr- cs3`( ,c)cP 5 - Gibal/ i `Y/0..._ L I iA- 12 I S y IN•etz_ere-}- is-p`t E A v L �' •,- ws> �y' G,y 3 '� i5'474 LTA v�� _ ( We the undersigned citizens representing RI-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the RI-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email ,..-z7L,Lr---) , , 4 '-'‘I 14)2/ef-A )1=1 }-J1 (i) Ili V 5`Ei.. 6 (4 o fLES' (l--�'GR i) (3 6 I /1 lei/G1 t OP4I . / 2 77/ 2-, bb,,,-2, Qt-kcr„f )Palos kb > , n k, ,.tr,..� 4 Q ✓ 1 _9," itp.)/44(7-17-A1c, 1509 2-----heritbric -- iii ,-..}-1/--- r ue a_j t tbv'= __,.-� - - � /1200-Vd/t4 „zr(f.,2 / /of . _<71- , r ( � '1e,{de,AstAii.0' i 33/ A), V/.S /fi- �� ///e6XL rc- k 1 �� ,b6L/trnmrncl ,ecI�ti1( 3 - n27 - 7 d A•-2-1'71X7-- l ar& N, w, c(o t-f e i 'd- . ��G7 ra- 3 2 7 --/ Z 4 7 No--16 rc)6.1Amil ( -In21 J 1.k ______,.. 1- -2_7- ra „, k9Tha A . 1,9,01 te,f60--ryii,t,, t -5c-2,7- 12.. -.:!eiell'1�- :.■1.7:-''r .4„.• _ r...' - 41 ',- u.- - �' - -- .I We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Department's recommendations for amending the proposed RI-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the RI-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email y W l L( ��l Jl At _s4-14(z-, z ro 2 c)-c5-- .z"V� / ra-.vz \ r 5L),,c) (0,(1, 1"0 0-q 5.-- E (,),*(A.,((\ .-( ;- -- 3 &iY L s©i2 q 31 E, 7cee�. 2_ 5i 1? � 71 - — g CO r. i K695 Coe 4� '--2Li _ o �w/ orniD /g'-3 s A/ r,0 2-c ii ( ��-_, f . / . 4 Alift. c _._"<?)--------. ?/e-2-9 /2-<70 (' 7-(4._ r--1 (f-3 i - 1(2pNvJUc We the undersigned citizens representing R1-43 residents of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby petition the City Council to forgo the Planning & Zoning Departments recommendations for amending the proposed R1-43 District outbuildings. We further petition the entire City Council to not make any changes to the R1-43 District outbuildings other than expressly outlawing the construction of Quonset hut style buildings. We do not agree with the recommendations as put forth. They do not take into consideration the needs, rights and desires of the owners nor the current diversity of buildings already built and approved within this District. Name Address Signature & Date Email 9'51krow-rifivirr/41e5 _/ �� � /pee ito f ( PUBLIC HEARING 1. For PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1381,REPEALING,AMENDING AND READOPTING SECTIONS 1-16-19-C, 1-16-19-D AND 1-16-19-E ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STORAGE SHEDS OF THE ZONING CODE REGARDING HEIGHT, SIZE AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. 2. Will DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR BRAD STEINKE speak to the Council? 3. Will the applicant or spokesperson please speak to the Council on this item? 4. Is there anyone from the public who wishes to speak on this item? (Are there any "Request to Speak" forms?) 5. If not,this hearing is closed. 6. Is there any discussion? 7. Call for a motion. 8. Call for a second. 9. Roll call vote. 4, t+ ACy ...4 Czy of Apache Junction u 22 of Home the Superstition Mountains ____ Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Brad Steinke, Development Services Director DATE: April 3, 2012 Agenda Type : Regular Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Community Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM• PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 1381, REPEALING, AMENDING AND READOPTING SECTIONS 1-16-19-C, 1-16-19-D, AND 1-16-19-E ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STORAGE SHEDS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ZONING CODE, REGARDING HEIGHT, SIZE AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. ACTION REQUESTED: No Recommendation DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Approval of Ordinance No. 1381 would amend the City of Apache Junction Zoning Code regarding size, height and design requirements for accessory buildings located within the R1-43, R1-43/MH and R1-43/PD zoning districts. On January 10, 2012, the Planning Zoning Commission recommended City Council approval of a similar ordinance by a 4-3 vote. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS / ALTERNATIVES: Zoning Ordinance Requirement RECOMMENDATION: On January 10, 2012, the Planning Zoning Commission recommended City Council approval of a simlar ordinance by a 4-3 vote. ATTACHMENTS: Click to download D Cover Memo 13 Ordinance 1381 City of Apache Junction Development Services Department To: Mayor and City Council From: Brad Steinke, Director of Development Services Date March 20, 2012 .-. Subject Proposed Ordinance 1381 Accessory Building Zoning Text Amendment (Case AM-4-11) Attached is the final draft ordinance regarding proposed amendments to the accessory building design, height and size standards. The primary impact of this proposed ordinance is to strengthen the design requirements for accessory buildings (greater than 120 square feet) located in the R1-43 zoning district (see Exhibit A map) The proposed ordinance is intended to reflect City Council comments and direction to staff from the February 21st meeting. Council members will recall that this proposed ordinance change is a result of, among other things, petition by over 100 residents who object to Quonset hut and metal accessory buildings within the R1-43 zoning district I've attached a copy of the petition (see Exhibit C) and other correspondence received on this matter(Exhibit D). There continues to be some misunderstanding and confusion regarding this draft ordinance The following explanations will hopefully clarify some of this confusion: 1 Question. Do the proposed R1-43 zoning district design standards only apply to the 1- square mile area (i e , 320 +/- properties) located north of Superstition Blvd, south of Lost Dutchman Blvd„east of Tomahawk Road and west of Goldfield Road? Answer No As presently drafted, the new design standards will apply to all property zoned with an R1-43 base zone. This includes, for example, the roughly 10 square miles of undeveloped State and BLM land that is zoned R1-43/PD 2. Question Can the City target this ordinance to just the 1-square mile R1-43 zoned area and exclude the other R1-43 zoned areas? Answer. From a zoning perspective, unless the City is interested in creating separate R1- 43 design districts, I recommend against creating different design standards within the R1-43 district based on location. I will defer to the City Attorney regarding the legal perspective on this question 3 Question. How does this proposed ordinance regulate the individual and total square footage of accessory buildings in the R1-43 district? Answer. The proposed ordinance limits the size of individual accessory buildings to the size of the home's footprint, and the combined square footage of all buildings to 20%of 1 the lot coverage. For example, if you had a 1,500 square foot ranch home on 2 acres, you are allowed ten 1,500 square foot accessory buildings. The proposed ordinance provides the following key requirements regarding accessory building design, height and size in the R1-43, R1-43/MH and R1-43/PD zoning districts 1. Quonset hut style buildings are expressly prohibited 2 Prefabricated corrugated metal or fiberglass building siding is expressly prohibited 3. The use of decorative metal siding (as illustrated in the ordinance) is considered a compatible building material and is permitted. 4. Equestrian buildings and car ports with no walls or partial shade walls extending no more than 6-feet below the roofline are exempt from the design regulations. 5 Open air equestrian buildings where at least 40% of the area between the ground and roofline is left open are exempt from the design regulations. 6. Accessory building height shall not exceed the height of the main structure 7. Accessory building size shall not exceed the footprint size of the main structure. 8 Waiver from the design, height and size requirements may be allowed subject to conditional use permit approval. Planning&Zoning Commission Recommendation At their January 10, 2012, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend Council approval of the ordinance presented in Exhibit B (Note the draft ordinance before the Council is a variation of the Commission's recommended ordinance) Staff Comment Since there was competing views from the Council regarding certain provisions of this draft ordinance, staff has crafted the ordinance to allow the Council to delete any specific provision without impacting the remainder of the ordinance Suggested Council Motions Option 1: I move for approval of proposed Ordinance 1381 as drafted. Option 2: I move to deny proposed Ordinance 1381. Option 3: I move to modify and approve proposed Ordinance 1381 subject to_ 2 Exhibit A GR and R1-43 Zones A , NORTH 0 z .,, Es Q r 4 cc w f 4 . -11 enp TEPEE Legend �' 1 ' ` r Zoning i . / I .,a -_ s < R1-43 ■ R1 43/Mii II= ,- R1 43/PD • } - 1 z f1 :.-1' ,11PE_... , e 1/29/2009 City of Apache Junction Development Services GIS Note:A colored version of this map will be illustrated at the Council meeting. 3 Exhibit B: Proposed Ordinance Amendment Section 1-6-19 (C) (D) and (E) of the Zoning Code Recommended by the P&Z on January 10, 2012* [Edited Version] (C) Accessory buildings are permitted in a rear yard or in the buildable area where the main building is permitted An accessory building in the R1-43 or R1-43/PD single-family zone, a multiple family residential zone or commercial zone shall not be larger than the existing building footprint square footage of the main structure. Accessory buildings in a single-family residential zone (minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet) shall be limited in terms of square footage by the maximum lot coverage allowed for all buildings in the zone in which they are located An accessory building in a single-family residential zone (lot sizes less than 20,000 square feet) shall not be larger than 75% of the existing building footprint square footage of the main structure and must also comply with setback and lot coverage requirements. (D) Accessory buildings larger than 120 square feet shall comply with the following height and design requirements. Horse shades, mare motels, hay storage buildings and car ports with no walls or with partial shade walls extending no more than 6 feet below the roofline (i.e.. see Image 6-1 for example of permitted partial shade wall) are exempt from the design requirements Maximum height for an accessory building larger than 120 square feet in area area greater than 120 square feet when complete, shall be subject to design criteria including: • F _ _ Image 6-1 (1) Accessory buildings design must be constructed of building materials that match or improve upon the main structure shall be compatible and consistent with the main structure's design and shall be constructed of building materials consistent with the main structure. The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for 4 determining if the accessor structure's proposed design and use of buildin• materials is compatible and consistent with the main structure. (2) Maximum height for accessory buildin•s located in residential and commercial zoning districts, except the GR TR R1-43 CB-1, CB-2, CI-1 and CI-2 zonin• districts. shall be less than or equal to the maximum hei•ht allowed by the zonin• district for the main building. Accessory buildings arc encouraged to have an architectural style that matches of improves upon the main structure. (3) Maximum height for accessor buildings located in the R1-43 zonin• district shall be less than or equal to the existing hei•ht of the main buildin•. Accessory materials,and architectural style. (4) Any air conditioning units must be placed on the ground behind accessory buildings or out of view from the public right-of-way (5) The height of accessory buildings is defined as the distance from ground level to the top of the parapet or the peak of the roof, depending on the design of the roof (6) Seventy-five percent (75%) of each exterior wall of a metal building located in single-family residential districts exce.t the GR, TR, and R1-43 zonin• districts, a shall be covered with supplemental building materials including, but not limited to, wood, masonry, stucco, siding which matches the home, textured paint or brick that are compatible and consistent with the main dwelling structure. (7) One-hundred percent(100%)of each exterior wall of an accessory buildin• located within the R1-43 zoning district shall be covered with buildin• materials that are compatible and consistent with the main dwellin• structure. Quonset hut st le buildings are expressly prohibited The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for determining if the accessory structure's proposed design and use of buildin• materials is compatible and consistent with the main structure. (8) Additions, alterations or expansions to existin• accessory buildin•s that were le•all constructed in the R1-43 district prior to the effective date of this ordinance amendment [insert effective date of the ordinance amendment] shall comply with the design standards provided for in Section 1-6-19 (D1 (6). (E) Any accessory building proposed to be taller than the maximum height allowed for the main structure in the district and/or larger than the maximum size building and/or which adds more square footage, as allowed by divisions (C) and (D) above, is subject to the design criteria described in division (D) immediately above and must be approved through a conditional use permit, which may invoke additional design criteria Pro•osed accessor buildings that do not corn el with the design standards •rovided for in Section 1-6-19 (D ma be approved through a conditional use permit. which ma invoke additional design, landscape or site conditions 5 ON Exhibit C: c, 5 �j Q P / Residents of zoning district R1-43 against metal and Quonset hut accessory buildings over 120 1 sq ft (horse structures excluded)- affecting only R1-43.the one square mile area bordered by Los: .Dutchman on the north,Superstition Blvd on the south,Goldfield on the east,and Tomahawk on the west. DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ~ . , 10/24/11 , David Bowling 1310 N Starr Rd 4;- //45M t 10/24/11 Cindy Bowling 1310 N Starr Rd C w:,/ 2 j y(,,, ' 10/24/11 Terry Martin I1388 N Starr Rd \, ' 10/24/11 Judy Martin L1388 N Starr Rd / r,. ' 10/24/11 Cathy Harper 11425 N Starr Rd a✓ z--" 6 10/24/11 Charlene Sparks 1425 N Starr Rd .,{, ' 1024/11 Sandy 1421 N Starr Rd 6 10/24/11 Marilynn S 7•,o r 1425 N Starr Rd _, ° 10/24/11 Ai Bucxmeier 11187 N Starr Rd Aics 10/24/11 Mary Ann C Cr tNe_, 1 1187 N Starr Rd D — " 11121 N Start Rd '2 10/24/11 Margo DeJaynes 1229 N Acacia Rd Ihd 2 '' 10/24/11 Torn Swanson 1229 N Acacia Rd ' 1024/11,Pete•Czaror 1263 N Acacia '' 1024!11iTrudy Czapc r 1263 N Acacia 16 10/24/11 Dan Prosch 2986 E Shiprock St .feotOddC.--,,,--- —" 10/24/11 Thea Ridhardson-Prosch 2986 E Shiprock St +6 1024/11 Dane Ica-Si S E 12745 E Tepee _ �_� 1S 1024/11Ter . )RE5ISE- ,2745 E Tepee '��_7 'V`, to 2° 1024/11 Phil K-t /faW 1355 N Acacia (,ke-ii-e,$) 2' 1024111,Theresa K.g/k w _ 11355 N Acacia ,/ /i�/a v , 22 �p ___ oze ' 25 i �� ,�I 24 1024111 Frank Talbot 1355 N Hilton Rd �_,74o,,c ��. " . /a- '�1� — 25 10/24/11 Steve Wei 3022 E Manzanita St 5,.b.,--i+, ,J 1 26 10/24/11 Sandra Wtzel 3022 E Manzanita St b d � �✓2' 10/24/11 Bob Thomas 2920 E Manzanita St6%`'� , 26 10/24/11 Laura Thomas 2920 E Manzanita St 4`�—�-- 26 10/24/11 Douglas Grudzinsk, 1336 N Hilton Rd 1:4144 30 1024/11Mck•Grudzinski 1336 N Hilton Rd v �,r �t,,.ri '' 1024/11 ii(.rS .1 via( i r/g'7 N f4Cfe(cr 32 10/24/11)6,Y4 v!1 TvO4C( f I i yig i/. cJ7CifI ,[4 , vw�j Ur 1024111 ( L'v--ti ISin,1,11.1,, j/2 b K }y. �'t1,c< 11.D . - --`--- " 10/24/11 1_,\'Na'W �TCVNV(. i/7-1, , C.6tY41't .Z.y 2'+w/.r. 1, ""n- a 1024/11 i Ahrig Eat+LCD by Pa- e='„Ct',c Al— 1—Au rG, 1.L:11- )'vSUC tk.;_v 6 ois Exhibit C (continued): Pc cV Residents of zoning district R1-43 against metal and Quonset hut accessory buildings over 120 Sq ft.(horse structures excluded)- affecting only R1-43 the one square mile area bordered by Lost Dutchman on the north,Superstition Blvd on the south,Goldfield on the east and Tomahawk on the west DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ' ///-S IL.,.rIA+.Co/f°ng /!�� 1'1 A'r+sr 4Z 1,` tikt�- // ' , eiN 2 j/S/L /2..064-"41 t. G✓i+s,7 /S95 A./ cov2Ti-z 2d _____--v -, ('. OW . 3 /I-512 s,}3,9.sj b 1 e,� ' eK A/ &o <7 e - -,ems,e.J kry `S. 'I r 1-2-,Z-i0,.► 46 r5 ,J Sa L i l c.,r-mf2j, tpLi___ S 1-S 1�--S dtr..Na� �>,1 1?1 - N. Corc4e.? 1 o I S"/� 5c c t CR 1J A A 939 4/ A. �e. a.441'4" a e. s-s,"---- ' I -5'/aR ir rh'v-.) Gf,y ?3 1 A/44e o, e,.., 8.44Q a J a. /'3'0 AI /'.rrs ?"9 Pre j4,IT, et o IN'.7 PkS.3`t"R11'k 'r r. ' 9zeN Ac Ac ,A ' z--F - C rrc „ /V5� �. h . i 12s7m9� ' 9,39 d/ �vu' '104,-- "j� al qc 41 if/ drac, c.ti Lr U // a ' " f/ do�7h.1,�.- 3 9 N. 4er-i-z..u.*52 1,,A ,a ` .3IF � 1M / 9g r4 : ' "3/ ° 1, UoraT1ylR� R39a'.�e�ci *P" 3/ Cw ° f 1 .4, S j N 4 c/i crrf //2' C.1 el 21 Vs-/rz ,ET"y & 3G %' ` .8 � t�9.9t� Q 9 V /� �y c1.�t •aG . ,, 22 1 t I TO E G Bern 1184 a , 4PR et I. • '(�, 23 1 /p ha -7 A c ti o n if 414 Al -&,, Q IAA //°. 224 liti a i�janc ko Pv nQV 1 6 71 gn(c 4 eI,/R,4 `71cz �ee/L-7.,0.,i, /, �(/� �lrr,/ shearnO /096 - 1• ,,-O ..e1d f , 7-1 2° 't 11 - . ,f,)F-f L 5-ieLvgtt 1''� 1 N Adz r(a 21 //f4fz hOtik L , jie `r37 pi 4\00,tt.. �3 , j 4 28 ►(tp'/2 C!Vr 15 1 10 h� �`'j� IV Ocixi,.a i 9 hs� 29 l/is 112,11 et..Si.t...'L I `'134 AI) t•_!-01 Gt.;4( - _ '° oPZ ric 9-39 n k/S1 A /32 1 le 1-1/ ,l,1 ra///�frr Arc ll/, 52c p) 4,,,,,, i1 { " n `��- ^'// k .e 4/41-, 2 4--a?a K-cM /S'3¢ ,l/ ,9c44/A d js�vl�.,� °i o/0,40 C*94,0ce`S 7;i1-4 4d wsb /<-3 I .ti 4!st ci,Q evil - u 'r%"/Z Shw?R. IA)pi e y C/L Z 0 55 eV.Cdit tCL t-j-_ 7 i Exhibit C (continued): P J • Residents of zoning district R1-43 against metal and Quonset hut accessory buildings over 120 sq ft.(horse structures excluded)- affecting only R1-43:the one square mile area bordered by Lost oink Dutchman on the north,Superstition Blvd on the south,Goldfield on the east,and Tomahawk on the west DATE PRINT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ' /-7-/Z <T 4./C 14/7aA/0t Zd55 A2 C4,e- cz_ c- 2 /"7_.Z r%rs -.✓,44 i 2o2...5 A). CO,e7—-- ,4 - ' /-)-/L Ji.,44 r 1.1 , Zz 75" iv. .e ►2A 0,4-e-co ' /-? a �/ /v J FvN/_ Z2 71 1v c'e,-eTLz ,e: • 44-✓L 6 I-i-Ia. l:,ndl'G,-11-)e,concsv,,,23g5 it ('>4e7- tZ m 6 1 1-I,L fnAR-K- sn- \_c23G5 N r,rkz. RA- ,lonitfiniAt, 7 J J7 1,-,- FTYc_`'1{-96rrrann ..-2 3 ',L f cxrr.2!?d -Ac.c... ,p ' ,1/7//.- r79 MA.cti«.:ci.,�/..r 2A St) 5 F0 & if ' /17 ,o I/V/.2 i c .,5 e\,.,f,,i ro , >, 'i 4- 3 F. is v„( 1 ,-„. ,e, „ 1 f7//.2 1,,, 1m ,,,,, _ I?7ci Jv 1-hl4 12d,, ,2 y 7// kJ,v,r,-, tAA,,,.-,- ,,t -)5 7J 4.1-,4,, �.4. 13 1(7// „ . �bH E•%rnhea,-4. 153,e, tit 0,i,cn 12,1 UI , '• I7//.1 5L.,54 nn.1, E.r n heo•-'` 1 S 36, NJ N. I1-0 n (Zcl t5 1/7//; k-;141,---7., Sieiq/e , ,1'oyr) F T<r.,_ St-. 16 rGOfre/e.,,` /WeA,142/4-7,-,/ /7/�. G�=R>��.d 6dovR/(111§4/ 9� t )0 IS i '72: / i/o.,.4 vil Yi e" TIS / 11 et!I/7/ E5Ii �\tr�",f ! / 5 ) !L' A J74Ve4 z3 `ig,S0,‘,i .,,n ( )rin _ i JIc1 N Sfa.Pl221 S E-si4r� w_.-ri-r H10 N . -rAft az to.11-in f ktP ,i► 22i//iz nle-h—ram+/ /��J11/4. 261 D . - 5-rrr-, 7/i - /9-/f .G,:a4�' 23 1111 2 AA.,,e1 r-i f-vre `-n 6) 1 Ai if,'/A)r-i ac , y .../trt' ,..-— 24 17 /11 Terri, (tor ,Ae irc ,').�; iv /1,/1v ✓-1 25 Ir02,L. ,ac,,,L.�,N, _t1)St( rl"IA.S.c.3n f).0- _,1,2. a2._5> Cl, sr-, 27 J ?/�/- S b,51,, °h,, N--A v`tsVA to5`-iNJ' •crooW,c,. _ r ( mN, 2R !' ) 9 fitZal�lo Coelll r 20So 14 U.10 an whit RA ' 29 7 (1� -.Ssrvt (fie{.u?,A s 2 r`i 41A,1 f '° L' 'i (-1_,,y,vte j-ka s 2 I E ,,,at it S - i, 6 a /1 a' 0r1 F' Alf Ot1'.l Mu,,, .f 32 l'.A,, r7 1 Qte,l ^(}+•riai,RC „ _/ ,1 33 , �Gci c tod l✓.WKeOG,A' /5e., N S 7,i 12 3s Vg/i 0-��A n1F Fa GO r, her'f,c n� 5+41 R k' X.1.�*- �... 35 v 8 Exhibit C (continued): Residents of zoning district RI-43 against metal and Quonset hut accessory buidings over 120 ,^ sq ft.(horse structures excluded)- affecting only R1-43:the one square mile area bordered by Lost Dutchman on the north,Superstition SW on the south,Goldfield on the east.and Tomahawk on the west DATE PRINT NAME T ADDRESS SIGNATURE 2 /7/,L ' .h , l�r�(u„� 97s 23 I/1 Id- ti�.W L(e L.A, \ rs A Y ism A -ka tt.l 24e,1 au; '° Oka QUO 5 a ( t C►1,�jc DS it�,ts !\1 Got-D 1.1.b RED .�?,u� `�[� -n 31 V9/4./ T✓��1.(At0Tie.A RA &Pe t Gl:.l41F,Pt( rd A�flLyL7 { �;E< , � jj 33 34 25 9 Exhibit D: March 13, 2012 Dear Mayor and Council Members, As a voting, tax payer of the city of Apache Junction, and a horse owner myself, I am asking you to read my opinion below before any decision is made to the changes proposed to the R1-43 .•. zoning ordinances, specifically regarding the construction of Quonset huts and commercial steel buildings in our one square mile area I have included the text that I have sent to the two newspapers for publication I cannot stress to you enough how much of a disservice it would be of this council to disregard the wishes of the people who live in this area, and who signed the petition so that their opinion would be duly heard It has also come to my attention that the Superstition Horseman's Association held a meeting last night (03/12/2012) to discuss this issue, no doubt being influenced by more inaccurate information and sounding more and more like a mob mentality Here is a quote from their announcement to their members. "Apache Junction city council is scheduled to vote on an ordinance regarding restricting ALL metal buildings larger than 10x12. We have a planning meeting tomorrow night at the boys&girls club that we need as many volunteers we can get This ordinance is specifically for the R1-43 zoning right now, but if it passes, could possibly effect general rule and the county" First of all, it was never"ALL"metal buildings larger than 10x12, and this ordinance change is not about the "what if's" down the road. This issue is concerning the residents of this particular square mile area of R1-43, and no one else. It does not"affect general rule and the county"— that would be a separate and different proposal altogether. It is extremely disturbing to me that our Council Members are being influenced or manipulated by people who do not live in the area of concern, and turning a deaf ear and not taking note of what the 96 3% (105 signatures, an overwhelming majority) of residents who DO live in this specific area want This whole ordinance change has been so blown out of proportion by the Council and Planning/Zoning Dept from what the original proposal was that it is now unrecognizable I urge you all to re-visit the original proposal and to vote with your own conscience when the time comes regarding this issue and consider what your constituents who actually live in this square mile of concern want first and foremost. I thank you for your time Sincerely, Thea Richardson-Prosch 2986 E Shiprock St Apache Junction, AZ 85119 480 671-3382 10 Exhibit D (continued): LETTER TO THE EDITOR Regarding the proposed changes to the zoning ordinances of R1-43,first of all I would like to get things straight—this affects only the one square mile area bordered by Lost Dutchman on the north, Superstition Blvd on the south,Goldfield on the east, and Tomahawk on the west- and ONLY this area This is only to prohibit the construction of Quonset hut style buildings and/or gigantic steel buildings of a commercial nature in OUR residential area. There seems to be a certain few council members who,for whatever reason,are spreading incorrect information,and are ignoring the wishes of their constituents who live in this square mile area and who have signed a petition clearly stating these wishes Why won't the Council members listen to the wishes of the people that this change will affect and protect, i.e. the people who live here in this area only? I am a horse owner myself, and this will not affect horse people whatsoever. All this is meant to do is protect homeowners who have spent thousands upon thousands of dollars on their homes from having their property values go down because of a Quonset hut or an oversized commercial-like steel building 10 feet away from their home. Certain Council members are now bellowing that this is a property rights issue, well yes, I suppose it is, and in that regard I/we have rights too—again, as clearly stated in the 100+ signatures on the petition presented to the Council. All we are asking for is the prohibition of the construction of Quonset hut buildings and oversized commercial-like steel buildings (i.e. with the height and size restriction we first proposed)in our little corner of the world So I ask you all to consider this, if we can't entice people to buy/build large, designer homes in this area because there are no restrictions in place to protect their investment,then I)they won't come and Apache Junction will go back to being the "Junk"area it used to be, 2)all the tax dollars those potential homeowners would have been spending will not exist, and guess who will have to fill that void to cover those taxes that are already being spent on the public benefits that we enjoy yes,the general populace of Apache Junction, and that would be you. So it's time to take a look at the big picture,folks hi a nutshell, 1)this affects only our square mile, 2)prohibits Quonset huts and/or oversized commercial-like steel buildings in our square mile area, 3) will in fact enhance the growth and attraction of Apache Junction to where we can all enjoy the beauty of the area and the growing public services that our tax dollars are able to fund 11 Exhibit D (continued): Apache Junction City Council Members After attending several council meetings I am getting the feeling some council members have forgotten why we are here.We are at this crossroad because 105 out of 109 city residents of the R 1-43 square mile signed a petition to prohibit Quonset huts and all large steel buildings from being erected in the only custom home area in Apache Junction.This represents 96.3%of the people asked to sign.three of the four that didn't sign stated that the city didn't enforce the present code so what was the use of trying ` to change it I guess what I am trying to say is the residents of the square mile whose property values are affected by an agricultural type steel building being erected ten feet off their lot line are almost in 100%agreement that they don't want them. We are not looking to change the whole city or the county as some members have suggested. I would like to touch on a few of the flawed arguments. Tack sheds Mine is 6x10 feet.You will be hard pressed to find a tack shed bigger that 10x12 feet in this town.Totally exempt. Hay storage Neither B&B Feed or Superstition Feed have the equipment to deliver a squeeze as a unit which would require a tall building.They load the 64 or 84 bale load on a flat bed truck and unload them one at a time into your hay facility They never stack them more than 6 high because they weigh 100#s each.1 can stack the large 84 bale squeeze inside a 10x12 foot building with 8 ft side walls and I don't even need a permit to build it. When council is discussing the partial lose of an$18.hale from not being covered or by being covered with unsightly tarps because steel is prohibited,it is not a rational argument.Put them in a 120 square foot building with 8 foot side walls on 3 or 4 sides with out a permit.Think of the hit on my house of 25 thousand dollars if the two Quonset huts that are on the ground next to me arc replaced with 14 or 16 foot high side wall steel agricultural buildings.This is our biggest fear when we hear council talk about prohibiting Quonset huts but allowing large steel buildings.And no it is not just about the shiny structure,it is about the buildings period. The No Fly Zone is the only one in the square mile that has a squeeze of hay delivered in an actual squeeze,from an outside source.Check out the hay shed.No tarps,no steel side walls,and they could have put steel around it any time they wanted to.Doesn't look like they are worried about loss. Property rights.If it is about property rights,then it is about our property rights as we arc the only ones with a vested interest.Not the people from outside the square mile trying to tell us what we need.Think about what they would be saying if I started tell GR what they need. C.U.Ps.C.U.Ps are too much trouble to go though?Did I hear that right at the council meeting?They serve a purpose to protect everyone's rights. .... We know our petition sheet and our RI-43 area is being scoured to find people to talk against us,and if they live in the square mile they have the same rights as 1 do.One was found and the rest either don't own a home here or live outside the square mile. Most of our residents arc not vocal people."They feel their signature should be enough to have their voice heard.- We ask the council to ask where the people live that oppose us and to ask themselves if they want one area in Apache Junction where people can build a custom home and have some assurance of what is built next to them. Thank you for all your work and consideration on this matter. Al Buckmeier 1187 N Starr Rd Apache Junction resident SHA member 12 fr , Exhibit D (continued): ?'t(turf, 3.21 (Z 3/19/2012 David and Cindy Bowling 1310 N Starr Rd " d.bowling777@gmail corn Dear John, I am extremely disturbed by the purposeful disinformation being disseminated to and by certain members of the Superstition Horseman's Association concerning the proposed zoning ordinance amendment for R 1-43 It seems to have been initiated by and the fire stoked by Chip Wilson that the proposed banning of Quonset huts and metal buildings larger than the main structure will negatively affect horse people and spread to all of Apache Junction and all of Pinal county This is what is being told to members—even if they live outside RI-43 with no financial stake in the matter at all!—in order to incite a riot at the upcoming council meeting on the issue.For Heaven's sake! Is Chip Wilson so misinformed that he actually fails to grasp the purpose of zoning.Apache Junction city code already states the intent,as well as any incorporated zone in the nation. How can a sitting member of City Council be either so misinformed or,more likely,so intentionally malicious as to purposefully sabotage the intent of the city in favor of some misguided attempt to adopt a"laws be damned.I should be able to do what I want no matter what it does to my neighbor's property values" attitude?'?? Such a person is rather blatantly displaying one of two things either he unequivocally fails to grasp the intent of zoning laws,or is misusing his position for some personal agenda(the goal,of which is beyond a reasonable person's grasp as it is not even in the best interest of SHA members!) What other choices are there to explain his dissemination of malicious misinformation to stir up people to a frenzy to oppose something they have been misled about in the first place? Any reasonably informed person knows that zoning laws do not"spread"or there would be no purpose to zoning—at all—anywhere! Chip Wilson should not only be overruled on this issue but be censured 1 or recalled from office having displayed either a profound a lack of understanding,or,more likely,a blatant misuse of official power towards enactment of his misguided personal agenda in opposition to good sense,the will of the people and the long term goals of zoning intent for Apache Junction. I hope you now are informed of this untruthful[and probably illegal]agenda by Chip Wilson We have confidence in your integrity to not only see through to the facts of Mr Wilson's misgwded personal agenda,but will also be informed and enact the overwhelming majority of the residents of R1-43 who want these buildings prohibited once and for all so that residents may have a reasonable expectation of seeing the original intent of the Apache Junction City Code,our property values and the quality of life in our zone protected. Most Sincerely, David Cindy Bowling ‘2."C(-71(/‘7-e---,-.7 13 Exhibit D (continued): March 22,2012 Brad Steinke Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Apache Junction City Council As a full time resident of Apache Junction and the R-143 zoning district,I would like to say that I am against the recent idea of banning all metal structures over 10'by 12'in size There are beautiful,high end metal structures in R-143 and indeed across the United States I am opposed to the idea of Quonset huts The building that started this entire situation is indeed ugly,in my opinion It is bright,shiny and looks like an Army barracks or commercial structure I can understand why the neighbors surrounding it are upset. But let's not throw the baby out with the bath water To ban all metal buildings is just going too far Certainly a happy medium can be reached. We have a 1060 square foot detached stucco home This home is only 11 years old We would like to build a garage and a horse motel. Your current proposed plan will severely limit my property rights in regards to accessory buildings. This entire situation saddens me. For 12 years we have brought horses to Apache Junction from Michigan and Ohio Now that we have finally been able to become full time residents here in Apache Junction,I would like to see Planning and Zoning the City Council show some common sense m this matter Thank you very much for your time Sincerely, Cathy Diroff 860 N.Wickiup Apache Junction,AZ 85119 14 Exhibit D (continued): March 22,2012 Brad Steinke Apache Junction City Council Apache Junction Planning and Zoning I would like to share my input on the issue of metal buildings I understand you want to ban all metal structures over 10'X12'. This idea is way too restrictive.As a property owner in R1-43, I should not be required to have a stucco horse barn because my house is stucco Your war on Quonset style buildings has grown way too wide I believe I should have a right to build a garage to house a recreational vehicle Your height restriction limits me because I have a one story ranch house. To have the ability to store the RV inside would be much more pleasing to my neighbors than stored out in the open. Your plan to limit my property rights is affecting my property value in a negative way Please consider the view of all residents not just the ones who put the issue out front. "Bob Diroff 860 N. Wickiup Rd Apache Junction,AZ 85119 15 Exhibit D (continued): -1 q-I Z_ To the Apache Junction City Council I wanted to give a little history of Section 15 to those of you who may not know the changes that have taken place over the years. 6/18/1962 Pinal County adopted a zoning ordinance designating most of Apache Junction G R 1/2 acre minimum 6/16/1969 At the request of property owners Pinal County rezoned Section 15 from G R to CR 1 -conventional housing only-no mobile homes 1982 Rather than hiring a consulting firm,the City formed a citizens committee to draft a General Plan. The proposal was submitted to P82 who removed all low density from the G P map When the proposal came before the council the public filled the council chambers with protesters The council voted not to remove low density(0-1 dwellings per acre)from the entire city,thus preserving Section 15 for further improvements 9/17/1985 City adopted R1-43 Zoning 6/2/1987 City denied request by citizens of Section 15 to down zone to 1 1/4 acre minimum 6/4/1991 In response to the citizens second request to bring Section 15 into compliance with the G P designation of low density the council voted unanimously to approve So as you can see, over the years there have been positive citizen initiated changes and now there seems to be a need for another This is a rural area and must be kept as such but perhaps there needs to be more consideration of each neighbors visual and monetary investments Sincerely, Nancy Koerner 1026 N. Goldfield Section 15 Suggested Provisions a) Non-permit accessory buildings- limit 2 b) No Quonset buildings Special use permit for other accessory buildings to insure appearance and c) placement 16 Exhibit D (continued): Dear Brad Steinke, I have concerns with the metal building zoning changes. Quonset huts can be banned but all metal buildings are going to extremes. No other city has this extreme of a code. Everybody keeps saying this only affects the 1 square mile area but that is not true. It will affect all R1-43 areas immediately then what will be the issues when it is next to a GR lot. That person will be saying "why can he put up a nice MD/Barnmaster horse barn, hay storage and car port but I cannot when our property is next to each other?" This new change will be installed in all zoning areas to be uniformly That is why as a horse owner and a property owner that I am against a total ban on metal buildings or requiring matching the house I see this as a possible eye sore in the future; an example would be putting up panels then adding plywood on the inside of them to protect the hay, this is possible because the panels are still portable and the wood is on the inside yet after a few years the wood becomes dry rotted and looks bad but a prefabricated metal barn looks good after 20 years As limiting the size of the building to the foot print of the house maybe okay except say the individual builds 1200 sq. ft home then wants to put up something for his 4 horse (12'x12' stalls) and hay storage plus tack storage he now exceeds the limit. Letting someone build a super store size building is also not acceptable either, there should be a happy medium somewhere. Any questions or comments please call me. Thank you Jeff Watson 480-628-6454 Exhibit D (continued): March 22,2012 Brad Stemke Apache Junction,AZ /IN To whom it may concern, We have had several members of SHA voice their concern regarding this new ordinance that live in the R1-43 district We truly understand the Quonset Hut issue and we believe all agree that it should be banned However,how did this issue grow into banning all metal buildings The structures are more stable than wood or stucco This is not appropriate in this area the way it is written We do understand the size is an issue if someone wants to build a commercial sized building,however we believe you need to think of the smaller homes and the limitations it has on them. If one of these homes is sold and someone wants to build a 1500 square foot building for their toys, which is reasonable, and the home is only 1100 square foot, does that not reduce the value of their property with these restrictions? Our recommendation is to pursue the banning of the Quonset Hut, however we disagree with the banning of all metal buildings larger than 120 square feet Please pass this along to the appropriate parties. Regards, Superstition Horsemen's Association Board of Directors OiN 18 ORDINANCE NO. 1381 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE 1-6, GENERAL PROVISIONS AND EXCEPTIONS, BY REPEALING, AMENDING AND READOPTING SECTIONS 1-6-19-C, 1-6-19-D AND 1-6-19-E ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND STORAGE SHEDS, IN CASE AM-4-11; AND REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. WHEREAS, Section 1-6-19 of the Zoning Code sets forth the regulations for Accessory Buildings and Storage Sheds in certain zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission ("Commission") received a petition from approximately 105 residents living within the R1-43 zoning district petitioning against metal and Quonset hut accessory buildings larger than 120 square feet in size located within their R1-43 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Commission directed staff to draft an ordinance amendment to strengthen the design requirements for accessory buildings located within the R1-43 zoning district, and then schedule a public hearing on such amendment; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2012, after holding two work sessions and one public hearing, the Commission voted 4 to 3 to recommended amendment to Sections 1-6-19-C, 1-6-19-D and 1-6-19-E regarding accessory building design, height and size standards; and WHEREAS, on February 21, 2012, after reviewing and discussing the Commission's recommendation, the City Council gave direction to staff to reformulate the recommended ordinance amendment and return to the Council for public hearing and possible action regarding amendment to the accessory building regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. IN GENERAL The Apache Junction City Code, Volume II, Land Development Code, Chapter 1, Zoning Ordinance, Article 6, General Provisions and Exceptions, Sections_1- 6-19-C, 1-6-19-D and 1-6-19-E Accessory Buildings and Storage Sheds, shall be repealed, amended and readopted to read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1381 PAGE 1 OF 8 (C) Location and Size Requirements . The following location and size requirements shall apply to accessory buildings larger than 120 square feet. (1) Accessory buildings are permitted in the buildable area where the main building is permitted. (2) Accessory buildings in the R1-43, R1-43/MH or R1-43/PD single-family zone, multiple family residential zones or commercial zones shall not be larger than the existing building footprint of the main structure. (3) Accessory buildings in a single-family residential zone with lot sizes less than 20, 000 square feet shall not be larger than 75% of the existing building footprint of the main structure. (4) Accessory buildings in single-family residential zones shall comply with the maximum lot coverage zoning standard. (5) Proposed accessory buildings that do not comply with the maximum size requirements established above may be approved through a conditional use permit, which may result in additional design, landscape or site conditions . (D) Design Requirements . The following design requirements shall apply to accessory buildings larger than 120 square feet . (1) R1-43, R1-43/MH and R1-43/PD Districts . One-hundred .� percent (100%) of each exterior wall of an accessory building shall be covered with building materials that are compatible and consistent with the main dwelling structure, subject to the following conditions : (a) Quonset hut style buildings are expressly prohibited (see example Image 6- 1) . (b) Pre-fabricated corrugated metal or fiberglass building siding is expressly prohibited (see example Image 6-2) . (c) The use of decorative metal siding as illustrated in Images 6-3 and 6-4 is considered a compatible building material and is allowed. ORDINANCE NO. 1381 PAGE 2 OF 8 (d) Equestrian buildings and car ports with no walls or with partial shade walls extending no more than 6 feet below the roofline are exempt from these design requirements (see example Image 6- 5) . (e) Open air equestrian buildings where at least forty (40) percent of the area between the ground .. and roofline is left open are exempt from these design requirements (see examples in Image 6-6) . (f) Earth tone colors shall be used for accessory buildings . (2) Residential Zoning Districts Except GR, TR, R1-43, R1- 43/MH and R1-43/PD. Seventy-five percent (75%) of each exterior wall of a metal building shall be covered with supplemental building materials including, but not limited to, wood, masonry, stucco or brick that are compatible and consistent with the main dwelling structure. (3) The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for determining if the accessory structure' s proposed design and exterior façade is compatible and consistent with the main structure. (4) Existing accessory buildings, or any additions, alterations or expansions of existing accessory buildings that were legally constructed prior to the effective date of this ordinance amendment shall be grandfathered. (5) Proposed accessory buildings that do not comply with the design requirements established above may be approved through a conditional use permit, which may result in additional design, landscape or site conditions (E) Height Regulations . The following height requirements shall apply to accessory buildings larger than 120 square feet. ORDINANCE NO. 1381 PAGE 3 OF 8 Oak (1) Maximum height for accessory buildings located in residential and commercial zoning districts, except the GR, TR, R1-43, R1-43/MH, R1-43/PD, CB-1, CB-2, CI-1 and CI-2 zoning districts, shall be less than or equal to the maximum height allowed by the zoning district for the main building. •�► (2) Maximum height for accessory buildings located in the R1-43, R1-43/MH and R1-43/PD zoning districts shall be less than or equal to the existing height of the main building. (3) The height of accessory buildings is defined as the distance from ground level to the top of the parapet or the peak of the roof, depending on the design of the roof. (4) Proposed accessory buildings that do not comply with the height requirements established above may be approved through a conditional use permit, which may result in additional design, landscape or site conditions . Image 6-1 ORDINANCE NO. 1381 PAGE 4 OF 8 �r1 't \ \: i —. 11110111 It op ..„.,...... . Image 6-2 '., er ....w,..w� e. y t N Wit;. „ .. , .. . . . . ,. R .tl - e j Image 6-3 ORDINANCE NO. 1381 PAGE 5 OF 8 •n • Image 6-4 • K 4 k, �f�te • ANEW • 11 Image 6-5 ORDINANCE NO. 1381 PAGE 6 OF 8 3`r imam' to W . Image 6-6 SECTION II: REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION III: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. ORDINANCE NO. 1381 PAGE 7 OF 8 Aloft_ p PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 2012. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2012. JOHN INSALACO Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: R. JOEL STERN City Attorney ORDINANCE NO 1381 PAGE 8 OF 8 -3 ROLL CALL VOTE i /\11) NOTES: 1 1 ) 6 2\ ',,,k() ' 1 ei, )4.,‘ ., tijki ‘fNi (\li /. i 1 1 r i V1 � I ITEM # • MEETING OF MOTION BY: � SECONDED BY V YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMEMBER SERDY \X . VI COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON V COUNCILMEMBER WILSONI COUNCILMEMBER BARKER MAYOR INSALACO I, J UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL V 7 � 0 ROLL CALL VOTE NOTES: ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY• SECONDED BY. YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON COUNCILMEMBER SERDY COUNCILMEMBER BARKER COUNCILMEMBER WILSON VICE MAYOR DIETZ MAYOR INSALACO UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 7 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1381 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED (Call upon the city clerk to read Ordinance No 1381 by title only Majority vote required ) I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO 1381, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, (BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED) OR(BE DENIED) I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1381, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED ANDADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING /'N 1. For PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1382,REPEALING TOWING SERVICES ORDINANCE NO. 885 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. 2. Will CITY ATTORNEY JOEL STERN speak to the Council? 3. Will the applicant or spokesperson please speak to the Council on this item? 4. Is there anyone from the public who wishes to speak on this item9 (Are there any "Request to Speak" forms?) 5. If not,this hearing is closed. 6. Is there any discussion? 7. Call for a motion. 8. Call for a second. 9. Roll call vote. tp ACH „ow City of Apache Junction Home of the Superstition Mountains 1'1roa0' al Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: R. Joel Stern, City Attorney DATE: April 3, 2012 Agenda Type : Regular Agenda Council Priority Focus Area Public Safety TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1382, REPEALING TOWING SERVICES ORDINANCE NO 885 IN ITS ENTIRETY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On March 20, 2011, the Mayor and City Council awarded bids to four tow companies and directed staff to prepare an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 885, which set forth the towing services regulations that have been in place since 1994. Approval of Ordinance No. 1382 will repeal Ordinance No. 885 with an emergency clause. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download 0 Ordinance No. 1382 ORDINANCE NO 1382 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 885 IN ITS ENTIRETY;i PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 885 was enacted by the City Council _. as a stand-alone ordinance on February 15, 1994, which established a rotation list process whereby tow businesses had to meet certain equipment, personnel, facility and other requirements in order to be called by the police department to perform tows of vehicles from public property within the City limits; and WHEREAS, at the May 3, 2010 council meeting, staff presented to council the practical challenges with Ordinance No. 885; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, the Mayor and City Council directed staff to begin the process of securing future towing services through an RFP/bid/contract; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2011, the Mayor and City Council awarded bids to four tow companies and directed staff to prepare an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 885. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 885 All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, including but not limited to Ordinance No 885 in its entirety, are hereby repealed. SECTION II PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. ORDINANCE NO. 1382 PAGE 1 OF 2 SECTION III DECLARING AN EMERGENCY The immediate operation of the provision of this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, and that an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, adoption and approval by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 2012 . SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2012 JOHN S . INSALACO Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. RICHARD JOEL STERN City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 1382 PAGE 2 OF 2 ROLL CALL VOTE NOTES A\1) ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY• SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON COUNCILMEMBER BARKER u' VieE-46\AYAZTFjZ COUNCILMEMBER SERDY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MAYOR INSALACO 4 UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL \J ROLL CALL VOTE NOTES. , //'Pli)j ..\,\\ vp \i \)) Y' \1 I3 ITEM # MEETING OF t_.9)1\il VP-iN MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: /YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMEMBER WILSON / COUNCILMEMBER SERDY V VICE MAYOR DIETZ COUNCILMEMBER BARKER COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON MAYOR INSALACO iv UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL iftk ITEM NO. 8 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO 1382 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (Call upon the city clerk to read Ordinance No 1382 by title only. Majority vote required) I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1382, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, (BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED) OR(BE DENIED). I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO 1382, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND-ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: ROLL CALL VOTE NOTES: \�\\1 V\c ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: r k'1"11/ YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR DIETZ COUNCILMEMBER WILSON COUNCILMEMBER BARKER COUNCILMEMBER SERDY COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON MAYOR INSALACO UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 9-10 I MOVE THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5.45 P.M AND A WORK SESSION AT 7 00 P M BE HELD ON MONDAY, APRIL 16, 2012, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS RESPECTIVELY; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5.45 P.M. BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 2012 IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM ADJOURNMENT: I MOVE THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P M ROLL CALL WS: 1.1 1 I v REG V SPEC CITY COUNCIL P I A P / A P / A MAYOR INSALACO ' VICE MAYOR DIETZ V COUNCILMEMBER BARKER l✓ ✓ COUNCILMEMBER SERDY 11" V COUNCILMEMBER SMITHSON V // COUNCILMEMBER WILSON TOTAL CITY STAFF City Manager George Hoffman V Assistant City Manager Bryant / f Powell i" 1/ City Clerk Kathleen Connelly b City Attorney Joel Stern U Public Safety Director Jerald Monahan Interim Public Works Director/ City Engineer Giao Pham Parks & Recreation Director Jeff Bell Library Director Spencer Paden Finance Director Donna Meinerts Development Svcs Director Brad Steinke Human Resources Director Liz Riley Economic Development .C� Director Steve Filipowicz t Assistant to the City Manager Matt Busby J OTHERS. A 1,,,1 + C r. 1, ! f?-e76 ‘4.71; —°/7 Date: yf3/iR CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Please select an option: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Item No. 1/, 7 a,Di/A-./c - /38f OR Call to The Public (One Form Per Item) Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda. Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? YesK NOD Only If Necessary ❑ ❑ I am in favor of the proposed Item. I am opposed to the proposed Item. Name (Print) /C/r A). ,fC,jC/,l !S*?/E jeA4 ccti' Address City Zip Code Telephone Email address This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council when called up to speak at the podium. Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit. 4 Consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded: , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting I further understand that this activity may be audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the Internet video stream showing their participation Signature of Parent/Guardian Date 02/23/12 ‘ /--1144 Date ( ' 3` zo /Z---- CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Please select an option: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Item No. OR Call to The Public (One Form Per Item) Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda. Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? Ye Nor Only If Necessary ❑ ❑ I am in favor of the proposed Item. 1 am opposed to the proposed Item. CoAme u(/7&i,cy 4'6,1/4e_ (A__. /Y--3 Name (Print) H3 / Gr-fez- J Address City Zip Code sty wo - 3S-S7 Telephone Email address This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council when called up to speak at the podium. Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit. Consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded: , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting I further understand that this activity may be audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the Internet video stream showing their participation. Signature of Parent/Guardian Date 02/23/12 Date: f-r • ` li� 17 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Please selec E an,optiarf? ��-- REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Item No. __LILL „r► o OR i Call to The Public (One Form Per Item) Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda. Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? YesI No❑ Only If Necessary ❑ ❑ I am in favor of the proposed Item. am opposed to the proposed Item. OUCk Name (�F'rint) qbo ffadt -TotctghpiAZ. ?5 1 I T Address City Zip Code 6,10 -a‘,6-& -zi raLk-ro-re6:--,,c;1 , , Telephone Email address This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council when called up to speak at the podium. Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit. ( Consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded: , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting I further understand that this activity may be audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the internet video stream showing their participation Signature of Parent/Guardian Date 02/23/12 Date: 41/3 f f CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Please select an option: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Item No. OR Call to The Public (One Form Per Item) Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda. Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? Yes❑ No; ;` Only If Necessary ❑ ❑ I am in favor of the proposed Item. r ;l am opposed to the proposed Item. Name (Print) 16- 7 S 4 , A(i C` t o- f 4-matIt" ar`0,0( 4 Z (S (f ? Address City Zip Code 7 /-o 35-- op Telephone Email address This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council when called up to speak at the podium. Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit. consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded: I, , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting I further understand that this activity may be audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the Internet video stream showing their participation Signature of Parent/Guardian Date 02/23/12 /9/LXZeZ fe/-ee/?-4 /17 Date: r--j ' / 2-- CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Please select an option. REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Item No. /38 I OR Call to The Public (One Form Per Item) Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda. Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? YesK No❑ Only If Necessary ❑ ❑ I am in favor of the proposed Item. l am opposed to the proposed Item. e k e -e ("- Name (Print) 1 < L • -re e-E. St Af S- 111 Address City Zip Code -I )v �-3 - 3 13 3 R L A 12T i S r �E � e c' nz' - 1 Telephone Email address This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council when called up to speak at the podium. Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit. Consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded: , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting. I further understand that this activity may be audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the internet video stream showing their participation. Signature of Parent/Guardian Date 02/23/12 Dater CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION /g--e--M i/caere-d-- .-77 Please select an option: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Item No. •% OR Call to The Public ,-f %%- 'tie (One Form Per Item) Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda. Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? YJ No❑ Only If Necessary ❑ ❑ I am in favor of the proposed Item. >cram opposed to the proposed Item. Name (Print Address 7,-/5 '"/,--CZ_ /_,(:_7 ',5-/Z,Z____ City Zip Code 0 .- ?cam-0V-/ iie Telephone E it address This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council when called up to speak at the podium. Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit. ( Consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded: I, , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting I further understand that this activity may be audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the internet video stream showing their participation. Signature of Parent/Guardian Date 02/23/12 Date: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Please select an option: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM Item No. ------ OR--- Call to The Public (One Form Per Item) Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda. Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? Yes❑ No❑ Only If Necessary ❑ o I am in favor of the p posed Item. ❑ I am opposed to the proposed Item. r - " 1 ; ,S5 A 6s-5-6--- Name (Print) : c/I .S C'Ac-ru s 07 (7 ) ? Address City Zip Code 1- -1S1/'0- '? z -1 3 Telephone Email address This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council when called up to speak at the podium. Note: Call to the Publicmments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit. ( 3onsent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded: I, , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting I further understand that this activity may be audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the Internet video stream showing their participation. Signature of Parent/Guardian Date 02/23/12