HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-11-16 WUCFD MINUTESWATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
(APACHE JUNCTION WATER COMPANY)
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 16, 2010
The regular meeting of the District Board of the Water
Utilities Community Facilities District (Apache Junction Water
Company), City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on November
16, 2010, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant
to the notice required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Insalaco called the meeting to order at 6:00
p.m.
ROLL CALL
Board Members Present:Chairperson Insalaco
Vice Chairperson Dietz
Mrs. Robin Barker
Mr. Douglas Coleman
Mr. R.E. Eck
Mr. Jeff Serdy
Mr. Chip Wilson
Staff Present:George Hoffman, District Manager
Kathleen Connelly, District Clerk
Frank Blanco, District Director
John White, District Finance Manager
Kay Bigelow, District Legal Counsel
Giao Pham, District Engineer
David Fern, Utility Director
Donna Meinerts, District Finance Dir.
Others Present:Bryant Powell, Assistant City Manager
Hazel Randall, Administrative Assistant
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 19,
2010
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 1 of 14
)Vice Chairperson Dietz
MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 19, 2010, BE APPROVED.
Mr. Eck SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH CENTRAL
ARIZONA COLLEGE FOR ITS
PARTICIPATION IN COST OF WATER LINE
REPLACEMENT
District Manager Frank
Blanco briefed the board on the item.He stated the location is
Broadway Road between Idaho and Winchester.The project is
replacing an existing 6" ACP line with a 12" ductile iron
pipeline.It is of mutual benefit to both the district and the
college.The cost participation is 50% for each.It will give
additional volume on the line on Broadway, with the intent to
abandon the 6" already in place and build a new 12" ductile iron
pipeline.In the future they will connect the 12" line to an
existing line going north and south on Winchester which will be
replaced with an 8" line.The 5 year capital improvement plan
included upgrading the 6" line surrounding Central Arizona
College.City, water district and college staff met together to
identify the requirements.It is a fast track project.They
have 90% of the plans plus the agreement before them.The
college's obligations are to develop engineering plans due by
January 1, 2011 and to construct a 12" water line by December 1,
2011.It will more likely be sooner than that.The district
obligations are to pay 50% of the engineering and construction
costs, not to exceed $90,000.Instead of hiring an engineer and
getting bids for construction of the pipeline, they piggybacked
on the college's existing project.It saves time and money and
provides an opportunity to partner with Central Arizona College.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
commented they upgraded to a 12" line all the way down Broadway
but stopped it at Idaho.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 2 of 14
District Director Frank
Blanco stated that is correct.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
commented they will just be tying into it and taking it to
Winchester.
District Director Frank
Blanco stated that is correct.
Mr. Eck commented going up to
an 8" is the minimum they need for fire hydrant protection.
District Director Frank
Blanco stated that is correct.It is related to fire flows.It
is substandard as it exists today.
Chairperson Insalaco closed
the discussion and called for a motion.
Mr. Coleman MOVED THAT THE
PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOR ITS
PARTICIPATION IN COST OF WATER LINE REPLACEMENT BE APPROVED AND
THAT THE BOARD CHAIR OR VICE CHAIR BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THIS
AGREEMENT SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY DISTRICT LEGAL
COUNSEL.
Mrs. Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous
The motion carried.
PURCHASE OF. ONE FORD F250, ONE FORD
RANGER AND.ONE FORD ESCAPE HYBRID
FROM STATE CONTRACT NO.
P7B/SCC07008-2
)District Director Frank
Blanco briefed the board on the item.He stated they would be
replacing two older vehicles.Public Works helped them out with
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 3 of 14
the procurement process, going directly to the state contract.
They were not successful with bids on the open market.
Mr. Eck asked if the older
vehicles would be saved and auctioned off.
District Director Frank
Blanco stated that is the intention.
Vice Chairperson Dietz asked
if they got a bid from the local Ford dealership.
Utility Director David Fern
stated they typically go through the state contract when they
award vehicles.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
commented they just went through this at the city.He was
wondering with this bid how close they came or if they even bid
on the vehicles.
Utility Director David Fern
commented with the economy the way it is right now, they tried
to go out for low bids to see if they could give the local
vendors a better opportunity to bid our vehicles.They found
out that the pricing on the state contract is so good that the
competition is not really that great.They tried it a couple of
times just to make sure but it turned out the local vendors
could not compete with the great pricing on the state contract.
Vice Chairperson Dietz asked
if we got a bid from a local vendor.
Utility Director David Fern
stated in order for the local vendors to be asked for a bid they
have to be on the state contracts.The local vendors were not
available to quote because they were not on the state contract.
Vice Chairperson Dietz asked
if they received something after they went through this the last
time about where we looked at the whole benefit.There was a
way it could be done.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 4 of 14
District Clerk Kathleen
Connelly stated they talked about it.
Mr. Eck commented they
received something about it but it did not reduce it
dramatically.
Utility Director David Fern
stated the city attorney did look into some type of local bid
preference.What he found out is that there are Arizona
statutes that make it difficult to do that and not violate the
state statutes.
Vice Chairperson Dietz stated
they were so close last time; they were just within $1,500 or
so.With the tax the city would have received with it being
purchased in the city, it actually brought that bid in lower
than the Five Star lowest bid last time.
Utility Director David Fern
stated they were not the low bidder last time, but if they had
done a local preference they would have been.
Mrs. Barker asked if the
hybrid is the beginning of a green fleet.
Utility Director David Fern
stated it hopefully is.It is a good start.It is a 4 cylinder
hybrid so the gas mileage will be really good.
Mr. Eck commented they should
go with the philosophy that they should always go local first if
possible, and if they cannot, something like this state contract
that is better is where they would have to go.It should be our
goal that if they can get a local bid they should try to, and it
is up to them if they can have the lowest bid.They made the
effort of trying to go local.
District Manager George
Hoffman stated that is a good common sense approach.The
challenge is that it is a bunch of staff time to bid the thing.
The local bidding is not free.We are running lean staff.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 5 of 14
Mr. Eck commented he does not
understand if they are just asking for a bid.
District Manager George
Hoffman stated they need to talk about what is in the bid
specifications.
Utility Director David Fern
stated they checked the resource time that it takes to put the
solicitation together.You have to put the bid documents
together to make it a fair and competitive bid, plus the time it
takes to present and prepare for council.The ballpark number
that they estimated that it takes to prepare a solicitation is
about $2,000 per solicitation.Unless we get a solicitation
that is $2,000 less than the state contract, it is a lost
opportunity/cost resource issue.
District Manager George
Hoffman commented if they could get their counterpart to get
their city attorney to do a best value, he believes that is the
concept.He asked the district clerk to confirm that.
District Clerk Kathleen
Connelly stated that is what she found in the Tucson code.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
commented he thought they had gotten a memo on the best value
deal.
District Manager George
Hoffman commented if they could emulate that model, there are a
lot of benefits to buying locally.Staff wants to buy locally.
The problem is they also try to be frugal.Twice they have gone
out and expended taxpayer dollars over here trying to save in
the purchase price over here and did not achieve that.
Vice Chairperson Dietz asked
what the difference is from here to where the last time we
purchased five vehicles.It was just a month or two ago.With
that one it went out to bid and he believed they used the state
contract for that one, also.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 6 of 14
Chairperson Insalaco stated
it went out to bid but it was all state contract.
Utility Director David Fern
stated they went out to public bid for the vehicles for the
police department with the Crown Victorias.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
commented there were five vehicles for the police department and
public works.
Utility Director David Fern
stated that is correct.The pricing actually, when they went
through the state contract this time, they got for $5,000 less
than the state contract value because of some of the work by our
fleet group to try to reduce the engine size.
Mr. Eck commented he is only
getting at is that the public perception is we do try to buy
locally.They will all be getting asked why they did not buy
locally.He does.People will want to know why they did not
buy these vehicles locally and they will have to tell them that
they got them cheaper someplace else.
Utility Director David Fern
commented that question could be answered by saying they need
the city attorney to develop some type of local bid preference.
Mr. Eck commented they have
to come up .with the low bid.When they can go out local., they
should. know.And they do know.They had to have known the last
time they bid and they did not bid quite low enough.It should
be our philosophy that if we can use local and they meet the
criteria, but if they are looking at what we are posting they
are going to do that.
Utility Director David Fern
stated another option is to get them to competitively go after
getting under the state contract.
Mrs. Barker stated it seems
like that would be .the most cost effective, too.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 7 of 14
Mr. Eck asked if they can
legally tell the local dealers that it might work if they are on
the state contract.
District Legal Counsel Kay
Bigelow stated they cannot have an institutionalized local
bidder preference.There is case law on that.They can
consider the amount of taxes they are getting off that as part
of taking if off the price.She believes David was saying the
car dealerships were not giving something that was even close to
just taking the sales tax off and then adding the cost of the
staff time and value, that it was not competitive.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
commented the last time they went out for the five vehicles, if
they would have considered the overall value, he thinks they
were coming out a few thousand dollars cheaper if they would
have gone local.
District Legal Counsel Kay
Bigelow stated it is always lowest responsible bidder.The word
responsible has qualitative things that are embedded in that.
The question is -what is qualitative, such .as having these guys
go down the block versus going to the other side of Phoenix has
some quality to it.How much is unsure-.They do not want to be
ridiculous about it, but they could probably support that.
Mr. Eck commented he thinks
they are doing what they are supposed to be doing.He would
just like the information for when someone catches him and says
something then he has the information.He thinks they are fine
and he believes he got them off track.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
commented shop local.
Mr. Eck agreed and commented
end of story.
Chairperson Insalaco closed
the discussion with no further comments and called for a motion.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page :8 of 114
Mr. Eck MOVED THAT THE
PURCHASE OF ONE FORD F250, ONE FORD RANGER AND ONE FORD ESCAPE
HYBRID FROM STATE CONTRACT NO. P7B/SCC070008-2 FOR A TOTAL
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $74,779.71 INCLUDING TAX TO REPLACE THREE
EXISTING VEHICLES BE APPROVED.
Mrs. Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-009,
AUTHORIZING THE BOARD TO APPLY TO
THE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE
AUTHORITY OF ARIZONA FOR TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDING
)District Legal Counsel Kay
Bigelow briefed the board on the item.She stated they are
required to have a formal resolution to apply for a technical
assistance grant with the Water Infrastructure Finance
Authority.
Mrs. Barker asked what the
technical assistance grant is for.
District Director Frank
Blanco stated the grant is for a Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition system.It is in the five year plan.The intent is
to get technical assistance to design and plan the project.It
is a $53,000 project with $21,000 covered by the water district
and $31,800 covered by the Water Infrastructure Finance
Authority.It is a matching grant.Much of the money from the
water district is staff time for research and the gathering of
information for the consultants.
Chairperson Insalaco closed
the discussion with no further comments and called for a motion.
Mrs. Barker MOVED THAT
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-009, A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 9 of 14
OF THE WATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA) AUTHORIZING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO
APPLY TO THE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE AUTHORITY (WIFA) FOR
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDING BE APPROVED.
Vice Chairperson Dietz
SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
DISTRICT MANAGER REPORT
None.
DISTRICT DIRECTOR REPORT
District Director Frank Blanco stated he was on the phone with
the General Services Administration regarding the federal land
that is along Houston Road for the future water treatment plant.
It has gone back to the Bureau of Reclamation.The value of the
property is over $60,000 so they are deliberating on whether
they can do a directly negotiated sale at this point or go back
out and auction the parcel.He will hear back from them next
week.The process has taken over 2 years thus far.He is
keeping in contact with them, letting them know the district is
still interested in that parcel.
Vice Chairperson Dietz asked if this is the one Pinal County is
supposed to be taking care of.
District Director Frank Blanco stated that is correct.
Vice Chairperson Dietz commented the district is doing all the
leg work on it.
District Legal Counsel Kay Bigelow stated the district is the
applicant because it was done before the agreement was put in
place.The district was afraid if the entities were switched it
would not have control over it or that it would be delayed.The
district therefore kept in control of it.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 10 of 14
Vice Chairperson Dietz asked what the problem is with the
$60,000 price tag.
District Director Frank Blanco stated according to federal
regulations, if the value exceeds $60,000, which it does, than
the Bureau of Reclamation could require that the parcel be
auctioned.We would have a similar situation that the Pinal
County people went through and they would have to be the high
bidder for acquiring the parcel.The bad thing is that it takes
more time.In terms of taking additional time, they currently
meet the demands for that facility so it is not hurting the
district directly today.We have the capacity through the
interconnect at Baseline.
Vice Chairperson Dietz stated he understood but it irritates him
to no end that we have to do all this and spend our staff time
when Pinal County should be all over it.It should have been
done by now and here we are still talking about it.
Chairperson Insalaco stated it irritates them all.
District Director Frank Blanco stated the next thing is the
sludge removal bid.The excess water from Well #6 is not drying
out in time and we have lots of decant water that is virtually
clean water that must be hauled off.It is very expensive.
They are going out for bid and they will have a consultant
reprogram the process for dewatering in order to recover more of
the clean water instead of having to haul it off.Sludge
disposal avoids violations of the Clean Water Act; there would
be very high fines if we got into a situation where it ran over
into a wash.They need the sludge disposal contract and they
need to reprogram the facility.
Mr. Eck asked if it could be put into the waste.
District Director Frank Blanco stated they cannot because it
contains a byproduct of the arsenic removal process.It
contains ferric chloride.
Mr. Eck commented it is then deemed sludge water.
District Director Frank Blanco stated that is correct.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 11 of 14
Vice Chairperson Dietz asked if they could get recharge credit
for this.
District Director Frank Blanco stated some of the water that is
hauled off can go to the wastewater treatment facility.The
sewer district will treat that water and actually do some
recharge, and then sell the water district the credit.It is
very costly and inefficient for us to do that.
Mrs. Barker commented we approve them to haul it and then have
to buy it back.
District Director Frank Blanco stated that is correct.
Mrs. Barker asked if an open water area like this can create a
mosquito problem.
District Director Frank Blanco stated it does not.They have.
not seen that problem.They try not to accumulate the water for
that long a period, but the quail look healthy out there.They
will be asking for approval to award a contract for sludge
removal in theE future.He commented on various news articles
regarding water scarcity in the Southwest.He commented on a
Nevada water resource employee suggesting tapping groundwater
using a 720 mile:pipeline under cattle=ranches and diverting
Mississippi River water to Las Vegas.According to Central
Arizona Project, the drought continues*ere.-2000 to 2010:have
been the driest years on record.LakePowell is 63% full, Lake
Mead is 39% and the -total storage on the Colorado River Basin is
55%.Last year atthis time it was 57%.This affects our
municipal and industrial water and our future lease water.The
Colorado River 2011 forecast is normal water supply, with over
90% probability of,normal water supply in 2012.If there is -a
shortage it will first occur in 2013, with less than a 35%
probability of a shortage in the next 5 years, for 15-25 years:
there will be no shortage to Central Arizona Project municipal
and ,industrial water and Indian priority water.When shortages
do -occur, the last ones cut mould be the municipal, industrial'
and Indian water.,
Chairperson Insalaco commented a year -ago -or so a member of the
Army -Corps of Engineers wasthinking about putting a canal
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 12 of 14
alongside 1-40 with floodgates at the Mississippi River.It
seems farfetched, but it makes a lot of sense.Instead of
flooding everyone down south, open the gate and let the water
come west.You would think with all the money getting spent
that someone would get smart and do something like this.
Mr. Eck stated it is similar to the Central Arizona Project.It
moves water all across Arizona.
District Director Frank Blanco stated it took a lot of money.
Mr. Eck commented it took some effort out of professional minds.
Chairperson Insalaco commented when he heard what he was saying,
he remembered that he had heard about it a couple of years ago.
District Director Frank Blanco commented they have said if there
is no shortage of money there is no shortage of water.The
water master plan is a large document available at the
chairperson's desk if they wish to go through it.It includes
infOrmation on water quality, demands, resources, water
infrastructure for producing and distributing water, costs, and
capital improvement plans.There is an executive summary if
they do not want to'read..the whole thing-.There are
recommendations at the end.They will use it for the next 10
years.The 5 year capital improvement plan is derived from the
master plan with the last 5 years derived:from -iecommendations
in the 'document and other new recommendations :that come along.
The final recommendations were to approve the 5 -year capital
improvement plan, to not approve a blank check for projects in
the plan but to come back to the board on an individual basis,
additional Central Arizona ,Project water, ,work -towards an 80%
Central Arizona Project water usage and 20% groundwater use,
Portalis providing an energy plant, non -revenue -water study,
feasibility study ofIviesa water treatment plant, water quality
modeling study, and a new water treatment plant.
DISTRICT TREASURER REPORT
None.
DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL REPORT
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 13 of 14
None.
ADJOURNMENT
) Chairperson Insalaco
adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m.
ACCEPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER , 2010,
BY THE CHAIRPERSON AND DISTRICT BOARD OF THE WATER UTILITIES
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (APACHE JUNCTION WATER COMPANY),
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER
2010.
0.4koLia_a_eo-
hn S. Insalaco
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Kathleen Connelly
District Clerk
WATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and
correct copy of the minutes of the regular meeting of the Water
Utilities Community Facilities District of the City of Apache
Junction, Arizona, held on the 16th day of November, 2010.I
further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and
that a quorum was present.
Dated this 19th day of November, 2010.
Kathleen Connelly
District Clerk
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010
Page 14 of 14