HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-04-21 WUCFD MINUTESWATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 21, 2015
The regular meeting of the District Board of the Water
Utilities Community Facilities District, City of Apache
Junction, Arizona, was held on April 21, 2015 at the Apache
Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required
by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Insalaco called the meeting to order at 6:00
p.m.
ROLL CALL
Board Members Present: Chairperson Insalaco
Vice Chairperson Barker
Mrs. Evans
Mr. Serdy
Mr. Wilson
Mr. Waldron
Staff Present:
(Mrs. Rizzi was absent)
Frank Blanco, District Director
Joel Stern, District Legal Counsel
John White, District Finance Manager
Kathleen Connelly, District Clerk
Bryant Powell, Assistant District
Manager
Donna Meinerts, District Treasurer
Others Present:Matt Busby, Assistant to the City
Manager
Evie McKinney, Water Accounts
Supervisor
Andria Samuels, Administrative
Assistant
Liz Riley, Human Resources Director
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 1 of 13
Emile Schmid, District Engineer
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 3,
2015
) Vice Chairperson Barker
MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF MARCH 3, 2015, BE APPROVED.
Mrs. Evans SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
RSOLUTION NO. 2015-002: ADOPTING
AMENDED FY 2014-2015 CLASSIFICATION
PLAN AND AMENDED FY 2014-2015
COMPENSATION PLAN
)District Director Frank
Blanco stated the resolution deals with the classification and
compensation plan that almost mirrors the city's plans.The
council has approved the city's recommendations.The water
district was included in the study as well.The distance
between steps suggested by the consultant is 2.5% versus the
current 4.3%.The water district agrees this plan would be more
sustainable. This makes the cost of implementation for the water
district to be around $18,500.For a one step increase in July
it would cost around $23,500.No employees were disadvantaged
by this or topped out.The water district is requesting the
resolution be approved.
Mr. Waldron MOVED THAT
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-002, A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE WATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA) DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD AND
ADOPTING CERTAIN DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE DISTRICT CLERK
ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION WATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION PLAN AMENDED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015";
AND "THE APACHE JUNCTION WATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT COMPENSATION PLAN AMENDED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015";
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE
APPROVED.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 2 of 13
Mrs. Evans SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
DATE, TIME AND LOCATION FOR BUDGET
WORK SESSIONS, TENTATIVE BUDGET
ADOPTION AND FINAL BUDGET ADOPTION )
)District Director Frank
Blanco stated the date, time and location for the water district
work session parallels the city's budget efforts as well.The
tentative budget adoption date would be May 19, 2015 and the
final budget adoption date would be June 16, 2015.
Vice Chairperson Barker asked
when board members would receive the budget.
District Finance Manager John
White stated the city budget books will be distributed April 23,
2015 and the water district budget will be included.
Vice Chairperson Barker MOVED
THAT THE FOLLOWING DATES, TIMES AND LOCATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016 BUDGET WORK SESSIONS, TENTATIVE BUDGET ADOPTION AND
FINAL BUDGET ADOPTION BE APPROVED: BUDGET WORK SESSION ON MAY 5,
2015 AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; TENTATIVE BUDGET
ADOPTION ON TUESDAY, MAY 19, 2015 AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE CITY
COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND FINAL ADOPTION ON TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 2015
AT 6:00 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCL CHAMBERS.
Mrs. Evans SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The -motion carried.
BID_ RESULTS AND FUNDING STRATEGIES
FOR: PROJECT WD 20l4-03BCONSTRUCTION
OF A SURFACE WATER TREATMENT
PLANT.)District Director Frank
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 3 of 13
Blanco gave some background information on how the water
district got to where they are today.In 2007 there was a water
resource assessment study report done by Damin S. Williams and
Associates.There were three recommendations that resulted from
the report.One was to acquire more Central Arizona Project
water.Another was to build an interconnect facility to be able
to move Central Arizona Project water from the city of Mesa into
Apache Junction.This is water that is treated at the Brown
Road water treatment plant.The third recommendation was to
either build an Apache Junction water treatment plant or to
partner with the city of Mesa or another entity on the
construction of a facility.To date the water district has done
the first two recommendations.They have the additional Central
Arizona Project water which was recently leased from the
Gila River Indian Community.A 100 -year lease for 1,000 acre
feet of water.The water district also applied for and was
successfully recommended for the reallocation of non -Indian
agricultural and Central Arizona Project water.It is pending
the Bureau of Reclamation's approval.The interconnect was
constructed in 2008.The water district has been delivering
Central Arizona Project that is treated at the city of Mesa
Brown Road water treatment plant.Bids for building a water
treatment plant have been collected, which was the third
recommendation.The 2010 master plan also mentioned building a
water treatment plant.The time frame was within five years.
In 2013 the board directed staff to proceed with the building of
an Apache Junction water district surface water treatment plant
versus partnering with the city of Mesa or another entity as a
minority owner because the water district would have such a
small demand in comparison with many of the other cities.The
water district would be disadvantaged in that they would not
really have any voice on major decisions on how they would treat
the water or the level of water quality they would expect to
receive.Due to this, the board directed the water district to
move forward with the water treatment plant project.The bid
process is now complete.Plan specifications and permitting
from Arizona Department of Environmental Quality have been
submitted.They also did a pre -selection process.The initial
phase is to supply the water district's current customer base -2
million gallons per day.The master plan of this facility takes
into account future expansion.The facility has been master
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 4 of 13
planned for 10 million gallons per day, five times the initial
phase.This enables self-reliance for Central Arizona Project
water treatment and delivery, enhances water quality and water
supply and reliability.The water district received five bids
on April 1, 2015.All five companies met the requirements of
having built a water treatment plant that treats and delivers
Central Arizona Project surface water.The bid results showed
Garney as the responsive lowest bidder.They came in at $9.166
million.The water district has seen in the past five years a
downturn of the economy which gave them very competitive bids.
Even though the bids came in a little bit higher than they were
wanting them to be, they were still about $700,000 lower than
the engineer's estimate of $9.863 million.Garney was about a
half -million lower than the next bidder, which was Hunter.The
highest bidder was $10.3 million.If the water district were to
set aside the lowest bidder and the highest bidder, the middle
bids were very competitive and were within 2%.Base bid 1 is
the packaged water treatment plant and that was preselected and
is a pre -negotiated price.All the bidders had the same price
of about a half -million dollars on this one.There was also a
base bid 2 and bid alternative 1 through 4.The total bid from
Garney is $9,166,800.The total base bids included the water
treatment module, the facility itself and the building.All of
the onsite piping, excavation and everything that goes with this
site is included in the total base bid of $9.8 million.The
other bids are an alternate bid 1 which was for paving, curb,
gutter and some decorative wrought iron fencing at the entrance
of the facility.Alternate bid 2 is for redundant pumps.The
pumps are primarily used for a dewatering facility.Dewatering
is basically removing the solids from the liquid.While going
through the water treatment process, the solids are filtered
out.Something has to be done with the solids and those are run
through a separate treatment process that removes the usable
water from the solids.The solids are hauled off to a landfill.
Solids are organic matter that is removed from the raw water
from the canal itself, such as sticks or dirt.Bid alternate 3
is a sewer line.It is a pipeline that connects the water
treatment plant to the sewer district's main line.It would
connect the onsite sewage that is generated from the occupants
of the building and also enables the water district to pump some
of the solids into the wastewater treatment facility in the
event there was an upset with the treatment process and the
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 5 of 13
water district was overloaded with solids and unable to remove
them and dry them out.
Assistant City Manager Bryant
Powell asked which way the pipeline goes.
District Director Frank
Blanco stated the pipeline goes from the treatment plant to the
sewer district.There is very low use in terms of the onsite
sewage generated by employees.One of the alternatives would be
to build a septic tank.Bid alternate 4 is a transmission main
that would be built along Ironwood to take water to the storage
tanks at Baseline, Buena Vista and 16th Avenue.There are
certain items that are required in order for them to have a
water treatment plant.He showed slides using different colors
to show what was required.The total base bid, bid alternate 3
and 4 are required in order for them to operate and treat water
and deliver it where it needs to be.Alternate 1 is the paving,
curb, gutter, iron fencing and decorative fencing which is not
required.They could possibly get by with chain link fencing.
This was bid out separately in case they had extremely high bids
that were higher than the engineers estimate and they had to cut
back.Bid alternate bid 2, the redundant pipes, are redundant.
Even though they are not really needed it adds to the
reliability of the treatment process.Without the redundancy,
if a pump goes down the plant can be compromised and they would
not be able to treat water at the capacity they would like to.
To recap, the cost is $115,000 for alternate bid 1, alternate
bid 2 is $128,000, alternate bid 3 is $146,000 and alternate bid
4 is $340,000.Alternate bid 4 is a higher item.It is a 16
inch transmission main and will get the water to the storage
facilities.It is a transmission main that in the future can be
expanded to the south to serve other growth.
Chairperson Insalaco asked if
the prices were included in the base bid.
District Director Frank
Blanco stated the total bid is $9,166,800 plus a contingency of
about 5%.The contract amount would not exceed $9,625,140.
This was what he recommended to the board.A financing plan was
developed in 2014 by the bond council to payoff and restructure
the district's outstanding debt on more efficient and favorable
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 6 of 13
terms.It was recommended was to terminate an indenture and
payoff 2004A bonds.Another recommendation was to borrow
additional monies from Water Infrastructure Finance Authority to
finance projects based on restructuring and paying off the
bonds.Actions taken in 2014 were the water board authorized
the district to pay off the 2004 bonds by resolution on April
30, 2014; payoff occurred June 20, 2014 and a Water
Infrastructure Finance Authority loan of $9,077,296 was applied
for and approved with a $1 million forgivable principle.This
means the district pays back about $8 million plus interest.
One million of what the district is receiving from the Water
Infrastructure Finance Authority is a forgivable loan, basically
a grant.Another action taken in 2014 was the water district
exercised their 100 -year -old lease from the Gila River Indian
Community tribe.This was done in June or July of 2014.The
Water Infrastructure Finance Authority loan is $9 million, less
$200,000 the water district has spent on the planning and design
of the plant, and $3 million was spent on the Gila River Indian
Community lease.The remaining amount is $5,780,402.Looking
at local funding the district has capital replacement fees,
capital facilities fees, land sale proceeds and an economic
development agreement.Some of these items, specifically the
economic development agreement money are programed.The
district has to pay off debt, so even though they are incurring
additional debt they have to continue operating and making sure
they are meeting requirements of being financially sound even
though they are building new projects.The funding strategy the
district is proposing is going keep them able to pay their bills
and keep their 1.2 ratio that is required to remain solvent.A
portion of the economic development agreement and capital
replacement fees are used to pay debt but another portion can go
to pay for other projects.The total Water Infrastructure
Finance Authority and local combined totals $11,415,471.Since
this project is an expensive endeavor it is not to be taken
lightly.He wanted to give the board as much information as he
could so they could make a sound decision.He is confident the
board will but he did not want to go off and say this is what we
came in at, these are the bids and approve the project.This is
why he is taking the time to go over the details and how the
district is going to pay for the project.The recommendation is
to award a contract for $9,625,140 to Garney Companies, Inc.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 7 of 13
Assistant City Manager Bryant
Powell stated this is a big step for the community in
controlling its destiny, the future and the economic development
of the community.The efforts the district has made over the
past several years to get the city to this point and develop the
financing mechanism, such as working with Water Infrastructure
Finance Authority and getting a million dollars of a recoverable
loan, have been huge and having the assets to be at this point
establishes them in becoming independent from different groups
they have had to work with since the beginning.He applauded
Frank and his staff for all the work they have done in getting
to this point.
Vice Chairperson Barker asked
what they see as the time frame for getting the project done.
District Director Frank
Blanco stated the construction time frame is a year.
Essentially 12 months, two months for getting everything set and
making sure everything is operating properly.It is a whole
year construction process.The local funding is being
replenished continually.Revenues are being allocated into the
individual funds.When funds become available they are used to
pay the capital replacement fees.Land sale proceeds have also
started to be replenished as well.The land sale proceeds were
earmarked for the treatment plant and got the district where
they needed to be.Some of the money on the land sale proceeds
was used to pay off the 2004 debt.Without having paid off that
debt the Water Infrastructure Finance Authority loan would not
have been possible.
District Finance Manager John
White stated he wanted to elaborate on one item regarding the
use of the land sale proceeds.The district took $1,560,000 to
pay off in advance three years on the land sale proceeds.Part
of the financing plan is to replenish money the district in
effect borrowed from the land sale for the debt service.There
is an "in lieu of" repayment to the land sale subfund in order
to help replenish that.The intent of the land sale proceeds
was always by policy for the water treatment plant so they are
replenishing it.He recently did a transfer of a half -million
dollars from the operating fund back into the land sale proceeds
to help keep it going.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 8 of 13
Assistant City Manager stated
when he introduced the city's new development director Larry
Kirch to the former state land commissioner they used the
opportunity to talk about Lost Dutchman Heights and some other
city efforts.When he started talking about this project he
could sense a positive response from the former commissioner by
her body language and by her asking him more questions about it.
The district has had a couple of follow up meetings with folks
interested in what the district's surface water treatment
allocation is and what, exactly, the district is doing with the
Gila River Indian Community.This information is something that
can be passed on to those who are interested in the district's
future growth corridor.
Mrs. Evans MOVED THAT THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN APACHE Junction WATER UTILITIES DISTRICT AND
GARNEY COMPANIES, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SURFACE WATER
TREATMENT PLANT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $9,625,140.00 BE
APPROVED.
Mr. Wilson SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
DISTRICT MANAGER REPORT
None.
DISTRICT DIRECTOR REPORT
District Director Frank Blanco gave an update on the water
system, water quality and coliform rule.The district had an
issue with a main break.It was really challenging because
there was a fiber optic box right over the pipeline.They had
to get the cable company to come out and properly secure it.
They put in a new 12 inch pipe main.They replaced the 12 inch
valve as well.The main was at Cortez and US 60.They were
fortunate the break only affected one customer.They worked
with the customer to let him know when the water would be off.
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 9 of 13
They left the water on as long as possible.Prior to this break
they had another main break in the same area.It affected the
RV park that is southeast of the location.There were lots of
people out of water for a couple of days.When they fixed the
other main leak they added some additional valves that allow
them to be able to fix things like this without putting people
out of water.Total coliform rule requires monthly monitoring
of total coliforms.Public notices are required if two samples
indicate the presence of coliform.If it happens in one month
they are required to do a public notice.The way the sampling
is done is by sampling locations throughout the district in the
most vulnerable areas which are furthest away from chlorination
so there may be stagnate water.A sample was taken when it was
rainy.It was also a bit windy.When they sent confirmation
samples to their lab, within 24 hours they came back with the
absence of any bacteria at all.The rules say if you have two
of themin one month they are required to give public notice.
Prior to this they had one sample that came back positive in
2011.They take samples on a routine basis every Monday
morning.They do a series of 15 a month, so lots of samples
have been taken but in this case because it happened twice in
one month they did the public notice.The public notices were
mailed to all water district customers.The decision was to do
one mass mailing instead of putting them in with the bills.
That way the public gets the notice the same way at the same
time.They have had two phone calls since then.One was a
gentleman just asking how the process worked.He was not
concerned about the water quality.He just wanted to know
basically how and where they sample the water.The other call
was a person concerned about an odor coming out of her restroom.
In both instances there was no real concern about the safety of
the water, which is important for the district to continue to
keep the public trust in place.The Water and Economic Forum
was for planning the future in northeast Pinal County.He
appreciated the city staff and board members that attended the
forum on March 31, 2015.The purpose of the event was to foster
regional cooperation and increase understanding of water's role
in economic development.It was intended to give -a foundation
and, in turn, learn about Arizona's success in water management
and how to:keep it going into the future.One thing that came
up at the forum was Chandler's approach to obtaining water in
advance of development and how they approach economic
development and water.It was really valuable for staff and
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 10 of 13
board members to see, and, hopefully, reinforcing to members of
the board that they are investing in something that is really
going to make a difference to the community.Their support and
vision to move forward with these major infrastructure projects
in acquiring water is very important and goes a long way.When
they look at water as an asset, they have a water portfolio with
the board's help and support that they have started to build
upon.Originally they had 2,919 acre feet of Central Arizona
Project water and they were permitted 2,372 acre feet of ground
water.Prior to 2008, they were using 98% ground water and
using very little of their Central Arizona Project water
allocation.Since then, they moved forward with the additional
infrastructure they built and were able to supply 70% and some
days 100% surface water.Some days they are able to supply 100%
groundwater.To have this type of flexibility really goes a
long way.There are very few municipalities or water systems
that are able to do this.There is 1,000 acre feet of new
acquired Gila River Indian Community water adding to the water
portfolio and 817 acre feet they have applied for on the non-
Indian agricultural water, also Central Arizona Project water.
There is 241 acre feet of long term storage credits they
developed with the sewer district.December 31, 2015 is the
deadline when the intergovernmental agreement expires with the
sewer district.Since the water district, sewer district and
the city are all government but separate entities they are not
really under one umbrella.It makes it a little bit more
challenging in terms of working to benefit all three entities.
The water district, for example, has to pay the sewer district
$172,000 a year for the purchase of the long term storage
credits.A utility would basically own those credits or a
municipality would own those credits.There would be no money
transfer so those funds would be able to be used to recharge
additional Central Arizona Project water and have those credits
developed in that manner.This is one of the challenges the
district has.They ,are working through it and have met with
Darren from the sewer district and will be meeting with Central
Arizona Project staff to talk about possibly having the sewer
district in an agreement with them as well to sell them long
term storage credits so the water district can better utilize
their Central Arizona Project water, get more of it and recharge
it in a different manner.They are trying to develop .a win -win
situation with a third party.They talked about not going to a
private water broker but working with themselves and another
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 11 of 13
governmental agency.They are trying to have this in place by
the end of the year.He stated the water festival is the day
after tomorrow and he hoped to have as many of the board members
there as possible.
Mr. Waldron complemented the water district staff on their
professionalism and hard work in fixing some vandalism that was
done to meters by his home.
DISTRICT TREASURER REPORT
None.
ADJOURNMENT
) Chairperson Insalaco
adjourned the meeting at 6:40 p.m.
ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF M4 -V , 2015,
BY THE CHAIRPERSON AND DISTRICT BOARD OF THE MATER UTILITIES
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT,(CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA).
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS
2015.
Kathleen Connelly
District Clerk
/114/,
hn S. In a 1arC(4,laco
DAY OF
Chairperson
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 12 of 13
WATER UTILITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and
correct copy of the minutes of the regular meeting of the Water
Utilities Community Facilities District of the City of Apache
Junction, Arizona, held on the 21st day of April, 2015.I
further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and
that a quorum was present.
Dated this 28th day of April, 2015.
Kathleen Connelly
District Clerk
7
-2c4Ee
Water Utilities Community Facilities District
Meeting Minutes of April 21, 2015
Page 13 of 13