The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984 03.20 City Council Regular Agenda rner .. PQACHE , G h Yi U * z • �R�zoN� `0it/ on C47Jac/le unction CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA MARCH 20, 1984 7:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (if required) 6:00 P.M. WORK SESSION (if required) CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Proposed Ordinance No. 243 , PZ-50-83, Application by Richard A. and Georgia Erickson to rezone 1. 5 acre '., parcel located south side of East Second Avenue between Hopi and Arizona Roads in Section 21 from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . B. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of March 6, 1984 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED GUESTS AND VISITORS AWARDS , PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 83-63, GP-2-83, Application by George Baljo for a General Plan amendment to have designated for "Conventional Housing Only" an area in the Palm Springs Sub- division bounded by South Winchester Road , East Southern Avenue, South Mariposa Road, East Navajo Avenue, South Royal Palm Road, and East Hondo Avenue. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219, PZ-32-83, Application by Randall Industries to rezone 10 acre parcel, located at northwest corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in Section 28 from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development . (First Reading) (5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 239, PZ-46-83 , Application by Arthur W. Mohr to rezone 1 . 25 acre parcel, located on north side of West Broadway Avenue, 165 feet east of South Delaware Drive in ,.-. Section 19, from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone, (First Reading) (6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 242, PZ-49-83, Application by John and Alice Kile to rezone 0. 75 acre parcel, located on north side of Greasewood Street , 100 feet east of Grand Drive in Section 18 from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) (7) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 248, PZ-54-83, Application by William J. and Ena C. MacKenzie to rezone 1 . 25 acre parcel, located at west side of North Gold Drive, 165 feet south of West Tepee Street in Section 17 from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite (TH) . (First Reading) (8) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 249, PZ-55-83, Application by Eldon H. Unger and Carmen F. Unger to rezone 10, 200 square foot parcel, located on northwest corner of West Ohio Street and North Lawther Drive in Section 19 from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone. (First Reading) (9) RECONSIDERATION OF MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ROADHAVEN PHASE I AND II , ORDINANCE NOS. 92 & 163 (10) PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS (11) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 268, AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CITY CODE (MAGISTRATE COURT) (First Reading) (12) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 269, REVISING SECTION 304(a) , BUILDING PERMIT FEES (First Reading) (13) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 270, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 9, HEALTH AND SANITATION, PERTAINING TO LITTER AT CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION SITES (First Reading with the Emergency Clause) Aft, Aft. (14) REQUEST TO EXTEND TEMPORARY LIBRARY CLERK POSITION TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (15) AWARD OF BID FOR AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY GENERATOR, PD-84-1 (16) AWARD OF BID FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR IBM SYSTEM 34, F-84-1 (17) ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATIONS FROM AND APPOINTMENTS TO THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM (18) SPECIAL MEETING, MARCH 21, 1984, FOR PURPOSE OF CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 268 AND OTHER COUNCIL MATTERS (19) SPECIAL MEETING, APRIL 3, 1984, FOR PURPOSE OF VOTE ON ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS (20) WORK SESSION, APRIL 2, 1984 (Optional) EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 1984 CALL TO THE PUBLIC (21) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (22) ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS . " I - - ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES i 1 iiii 1 iti I , i p 0 i Cr / 019 1 4 0 1' i J/::IP ITEM # I MEETING OF 3 c i)MOTION BY: LSECONDED BY: /4,49 YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR . COUNCILMAN HILL f COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ VICE_MAYOR FIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V LCOUNCILMAN STEELS11fl ► V MAY F __ OR_CLARK UNAN I". US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • • • • • ITEM NO . 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . (TTZ '9PizOlAP c6ity 4 ache 2unctjon DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 15, 1984 ,--A) Approver for Agenda Date Item # First Reading 3/1rp(/ 6' Second Reading,f /,�i� 7/7 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ Old Business � ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR t L �. �„�L New Business ti' Consent Agenda FROM: V, JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER c SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-50-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 243) MARCH 6, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING MARCH 20, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-50-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 243, is a request by the applicants Richard A. and Georgia A. Erickson to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a vacant 1 .25 acre parcel located on the south side of East 2nd Avenue between Hopi and Arizona Roads in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile homes, and houses. Other Information and Application Requirements Power of Attorney: Ericksons to Burgess and Granillo Number of Property Owners 7 Number of Exempt Properties 0 Number of Affected Owners 7 Number of Signatures 4=57% Signatures by Affected Area 55.7% Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west, north, and east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-50-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 243) February 15, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 14, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Polomskey/Rogers (6-0-1 ) ) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-50-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 243, application of Richard A and Georgia A. Erickson for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the west, north, and east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . The request complies with the General Plan. 2. It is the best use of the property." Recommended Motion See attached. ORDINANCE NO 243 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT .. CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-50-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. ,;� :,: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, �..� ARIZONA, THAT ( SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The North } of the north 330 feet of the East 2 of the Southwest of the Northwest ,- of the Southeast ; of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, _ be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification " from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH). SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed � * g SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any ` court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the r validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 00 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 • - Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST • Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av Aexa?fdel: City Attorney -- -- ( PZ-50-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 243 PROPOSED REZONING FROM CR-GENERAL RURAL TO TH-TRAILER HOMESITE 1 E. JUNCTION DRIVE . . (E) (E) 0 GR 0 (!!) GR (E) . .. . GR ..,- . (E) GR GR GR (I) GR r to i GR _ (E) 1--- (._a a c a v. - a L (r. a ce ... o > cc a c z R = < ID 4111 GR GR GR — - - GR . E. 4TH AVE. .. . 1 - SUBJECT SITE . , . N SCALE: 1"=200' 0 - COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 101-22 , - - RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 243 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-50-83 , application of Richard A and Georgia A Erickson ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 243 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-50-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL The applicant dedicate the west, north, and east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) Amok CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 6, 1984 /1.111k 1 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, • Arizona, was held on March 6, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7.03 p m INVOCATION Vice Mayor Eidson led the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL _ Councilmen Present: Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Taylor, Councilman ( Hill, Vice Mayor Eidson, t Mayor Clarke Staff Present City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Controller Keith Lewis Director of Public Works Rich Broman Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa Planning/Drafting Technician Julie Reid Operation Supervisor Doug Dobson Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark a z_ Others Present: Mr. William Gresser, President American Greyhound Racing Mr. John Bolling Arthur Young and Company Mr. Roger Short 1256 S Buena Vista Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Jerry Burgess 349 S Saguaro Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Howard D. Keller 650 W Apache Trail Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr Harvey Morrison 1834 W. Roundup St. Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Tom Sansoni 1560 W. Superstition Blvd., Sp.16 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Frank Jimenez 1800 S. Monterey Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Charles Harrison 1265 N Warner Dr Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT n: •: � »�-- RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ) Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 238, PZ-45-83, APPLICATION BY BELLUCCl/RAGAN TO REZONE 0.5 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF BROADWAY AND HIGHWAY 60 IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, TO INCLUDE THAT THE APPLICANT DEDICATE THE SOUTH FIFTY (50') FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES, B PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 240, PZ-48-83, APPLICATION BY CLYDE AND ELLEANOR WYATT TO REZONE 2.5 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 60 AND COLT ROAD IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, TO INCLUDE (1) THE APPLICANT DEDICATE THE WEST THIRTY-THREE (33') FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES. (2) THE APPLICANT BE REQUIRED TO DO OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS SIDEWALKS, CURBS, AND GUTTERS DUE TO THE DOGLEG ON SOUTH COLT ROAD, AND C: ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1984, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 2 VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Introduction of Distinguished Guests and Visitors None AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Clarke read the following memorandum from Director of Public Safety, William E McDaniel: "Apache Junction Police Department has retired badge #19 in honor of Officer Russ Duncan, who gave his life, while training to be more efficient in his job as a Police Officer, to better serve the community in which he lived and worked. We are respectfully requesting that this badge and plaque be presented to Mrs Russ Duncan in memory of her husband " Mayor Clarke presented Mrs. Russ Duncan with the badge and plaque, and presented Certificates of Award to Mr. and Mrs. Richard Taylor and others for holding a benefit auction for the Russell Duncan Memorial Fund. Mr. William Gresser, President, American Greyhound Racing, gave a presentation on the improvements to the Apache Junction Greyhound Park, including the new teletrack facilities. He announced that the track was scheduled to be opened on March 20. Mayor Clarke commented that this facility has attracted nationwide attention. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Michael J. McNulty announced that a presentation of the final draft of the Magistrate Court Study would be given by Mr. John Bolling of Arthur Young and Company. Mr. Bolling stated that the volume of citations has increased from 2700 in 1980 to over 4200 in 1983, and the amount collected in fines has risen from $116,000 00 to over $313,000.00 in the same four-year period, and that it is necessary to improve the efficiency of the court system. Mr. Bolling expanded on the various areas needing improvements and offered alternatives and solutions. Mayor Clarke expressed his disappointment that the Study didn't go into ��.-•vim;��. �;�b;,�� ,- areas such as amounts of fines and bonds. Mr. Bolling stated that the bail and fine schedules had been reviewed and they seemed to be in order. Councilman Damiano asked if they were in order in comparison to other courts. Mr. Bolling stated that yes, in comparison to other courts in the County and State. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 265, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 188, 199, 225, 226, 230 AND 237 (First Reading with Emergency Clause) ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public /s., City Attorney David Alexander briefed the Council, stating that since the utilization of the Consent Agenda, several zoning amendments have been passed not including terms and conditions that were agreed upon by the applicants prior to approval by the Council, and this ordinance amends several ordinances passed previously to include the stipulations. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 265, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. .'V Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 265, by title only for the first reading with the Emergency Clause. • as follows: City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read l ORDINANCE NO. 265, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING ORDINANCES NUMBERED 188, 199, 225, 226, 230 AND 237; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 265, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING ORDINANCES NUMBERED 188, 199, 225, 226, 230 AND 237; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 4 .011 O. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 266, AMENDING PERSONNEL POLICIES (First Reading with Emergency Clause) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. City Manager McNulty explained that a legal holiday that had normally been observed was replaced with the �► employees birthday, but that since the Court cannot legally conduct business on this holiday. The Court employees would substitute their birthday holiday for Lincoln's Day Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the amendment - There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 266, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 266, by title only for the first reading with the Emergency Clause City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows• ORDINANCE NO 266, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 3 ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM, PERTAINING TO PAID HOLIDAYS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES, - REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. ,..� - Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 266, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 3 ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM, PERTAINING TO PAID HOLIDAYS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the • motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. • REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 5 MAJOR AMENDMENTS TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ROADHAVEN PHASE I AND II Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa briefed the Council, stating that this is a request by Roadhaven to reduce minimum travel trailer unit separation from 19.5 feet to 16.5 feet, and to reduce the minimum space line setback from three feet to zero, and that a letter had been received from Mr. Harry Bidwell mentioning meetings with Mr. Gero where it was agreed that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions may be amended by Mr. Gero, who advised the staff that he does not recall any such agreement. Mr. Nakagawa reminded the Council that Roadhaven Phase I and II were approved in 1983, and further stated that the staff foresee future problems were this to be approved. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. Mr. Roger Short, 1256 S. Buena Vista, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in opposition to the petition Mr. Nakagawa stated that there was little objection from the Development Coordinating Committee in regards to the amendment, however, dissenting from the other members of the Development Coordinating Committee, the Planning staff would recommend denial. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT BY HARRY BIDWELL FOR A REDUCTION TO 16.5 FEET IN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TRAILER UNITS AND FOR A ( REDUCTION TO ZERO FEET IN THE SETBACK DISTANCE TO SPACE LINES FOR ROADHAVEN l PHASES I AND II (PZ-6-81) AND PZ-19-82) BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 243, PZ-50-83, ERICKSON (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Council on r ,v the rezoning application from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), a vacant 1.25 acre parcel located on the south side of East 2nd Avenue between Hopi and Arizona Roads in Section 21 Mr. Jerry Burgess, 349 S Saguaro, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in favor of the rezoning. Mr Nakagawa stated that the Development Coordinating Committee has no objection and the Planning and Zoning recommends approval of the application. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 6 Auk Am. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 243, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 243, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTIONPINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-50-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, CACTUS CLUB Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr Howard D Keller, 650 W Apache Trail, Apache Junction, explained that this business had been sold but has now repossessed it, which is the purpose for the transfer of the liquor license. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY MR. HOWARD KELLER AGENT FOR THE CACTUS CLUB, DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE IS A QUESTION OF OWNERSHIP OF THE LICENSE AT THIS TIME, THAT NO RECOMMENDATION BE GIVEN Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. Councilman Shanks clarified the purpose of the motion, stating that until the litigation is cleared up, the Council chooses to not make a recommendation. A.'►„ Vice Mayor Eidson asked what the cost was to process a liquor license application City Clerk Kathleen Connelly replied that the cost is in the area of $200, with an initial liquor license fee and a yearly renewal fee of $35.00. Vice Mayor Eidson stated that he felt that the Council did the citizens a injustice by denying the fee increase proposed at a previous meeting and would bring it to their attention from time to time. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting. Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting at 8:04 p.m. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 7 OLD BUSINESS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 232, PZ-43-83, OERTLE/EARDLEY (Second Reading) Mayor Clarke made the following statement: "At the last Council meeting, we held a public hearing on this issue. We listened to both sides at great length, both sides were very sincere in their respective positions We even let people speak after the public hearing was closed I feel that we did a good job of listening to some good presentations. It may have seemed a difficult issue to decide but if one would analyze what really is best for the entire area, the answer is easy to see what is best for the entire area. First, the comments it is zoned CR-3 now, put houses there. By putting 10 more acres of houses next to mobile zoning will not improve the situation that already exists. If houses - are constructed there , the traffic problem would be greater than if it were developed into an adult R.V. subdivision There would be no walls around the project and a possibility of 8 to 10 driveways on San Marcos plus 3 or 4 drives on 12th Avenue. Most homes in a residential area have 2 cars, some with 3 cars, plus motorcycles, boats, et Secondly, to construct apartments on this 10 acres may not be financially feasible as there are many units being repossessed at the present time in Apache Junction This parcel of land, if rezoned CR-5, could accommodate a minimum of 70 living units To place this many units on the property, no doubt it would have to be two story construction. The view would definitely be blocked more than R.V. or mobile units Again no walls, more driveways, more vehicles. Not to mention the possibility of more trash as we now are confronted within new apartment complexes in several areas ( As long as I have been on the Council, the word from the public has been to Il place all TH zoning in one area whenever possible." Vice Mayor Eidson stated that upon speaking with the homeowners in the area of this proposed RV park, he has concluded that the protests will not be dropped and the homeowners will continue to oppose this development. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, '~ ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 232, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 232, by title only for the second reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 8 'oak oak ORDINANCE NO. 232, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-43-83 FROM C-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. Mayor Clarke MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 232, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-43-83 FROM C-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Damiano stated that the development is an "RV Park" and not a "trailer park", further expanding on the differences, and that this is preferable to apartments in this particular area Councilman Shanks expressed opposition to additional parks being built in this area. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE: In Favor• Councilman Taylor, Councilman Hill, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Steelsmith, Mayor Clarke Opposed Councilman Shanks, Vice Mayor Eidson The motion carried. Il NEW BUSINESS ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL REPORT AND = RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CABLE TV ) Director of Public Works Rich Broman introduced Mr. Jack Barrett, Chairman of the Citizens Advisory Committee on Cable TV Mr. Barrett informed the Council that there were two bids submitted, and recommended Dowden Communications, Inc. be awarded the bid, and further explained the specifics of the contract to install Cable TV in Apache Junction. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY MANAGER IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO INITIATE COORDINATION WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF DOWDEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., IN ORDER TO PREPARE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF A CABLE TELEVISION LICENSE ENABLING ORDINANCE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CABLE TELEVISION BE DISCONTINUED, AS THEIR CHARGES HAVE BEEN FULFILLED. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 9 • Councilman Damiano also expressed his regret that the Committee would be discontinued. Councilman Taylor stated that the Committee had performed their duties efficiently and excellently. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous /ak The motion carried. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PINAL COUNTY ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT FOR MAY 15TH SPECIAL ELECTION City Clerk Kathleen Connelly informed the Council that Pinal County services had been utilized for the General Election last May and had saved the City considerable time and a - great deal of money. Ms Connelly recommended the use of these services provided by County Elections Director Gilbert Hoyos and his staff for the May 15th Special Election for the one-time budget override. Councilman Damiano wished to know the number of precincts in the City. Ms Connelly stated that there are unofficially six precincts, which have not as yet been approved by the Justice Department Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PINAL COUNTY, TO PROVIDE SERVICES SUPPLIES NECESSARY FOR THE MAY 15, 1984, SPECIAL ELECTION, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000 00, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. AUTHORIZATION FOR LEASE/PURCHASE OF W20C WHEEL LOADER Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE LEASE PURCHASE OF A W20C WHEEL LOADER FROM CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT, STATE OF ARIZONA BID NUMBER A4-00249, IN THE AMOUNT OF $43,373.00, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Shanks informed the public that due to the State bidding process, the City would save in the area of $30,000.00 for this equipment. • REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 10 WORK SESSION EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, MARCH 20, 1984 Mayor Clarke stated that there will not be a Work Session held on March 19, 1984. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MARCH 20, 1984, AT 6:00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. _ ts Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. CALL TO THE PUBLIC Mr Harvey Morrison, 1834 W. Roundup St., Apache Junction, requested a four-way stop at Ironwood Drive and Superstition Boulevard, due to traffic problems. Councilman Hill agreed that this intersection is a problem and should have a four-way stop Mayor Clarke stated that the Council appreciates public comment on • :--..,, 4.•-: similar situations, and would act whenever possible. Mr. Tom Sansoni, 1560 W Superstition Blvd , Space 16, Apache Junction, requested factual information from the Council or homeowners proving that trailers or trailer parks depreciate the value of homes. ( Mr Frank Jimenez, 1800 S Monterey, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in regards to two subjects; Trailer Homesite rezoning cases, and the Magistrate Court study, expressing his opposition to trailer and RV parks Mr. Charles Harrison, 1265 N Warner Dr , Apache Junction, spoke in opposition to Judge Leo Coombs and the City Council, stating that a legal petition would be circulated for the removal of the City Council from office. • INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) None. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL None. ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:45 P.M. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 11 Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Asolok ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. • Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk • REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 6, 1984 PAGE 12 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEf1 # 9./ MEETING OF Y249 (64/WiAj MOTION BY: - SECONDED BY: Th4701A-' ,ES NO ABSTAINED COuNCII ,MAN IXIMIAN0 ccINCILMAN HILL11/ CnuNCILEAN TAYLOR I _COUNCIL MAN _HANKSVitt J[ICF MAYOR EIDSON /� �/._COUNCILMAN_. STEELSMITH MAYOR CLARKE UNAN 'IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • ITEM NO . 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 243 , PZ-50-83 , APPLICATION BY RICHARD A. AND GEORGIA ERICKSON TO REZONE 1 . 5 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH SIDE OF EAST SECOND AVENUE BETWEEN HOPI AND ARIZONA ROADS IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE ( TH ) , INCLUDING THE APPLICANT DEDICATING THE WEST , NORTH , AND EAST THIRTY-THREE ( 33 ' ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES , B : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 6 , 1984 , BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR RESOLUTION NO , 83-63 GP-2-83 , THE APPLICANT IS GEORGE BALJO 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED o ! ii' Is U �, "qR_ _ cO'ity o C9479ache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ ,�0 , ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR f' ' PREPARED BY: ''JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM GP-2-83 (PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 83-63) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION This is a request by Mr. George Baljo for a General Plan amendment to have designated for "Conventional Housing Only" an area in the Palm Springs Subdivision bounded approximately by South Winchester Road, East Southern Avenue, South Mariposa Road, East Navajo Avenue, South Royal Palm Road, and East Hondo Avenue. Background Information On February 16, 1982, the Apache Junction City Council adopted Ordinance No. 94 (PZ-4-81 ) rezoning units 2, 3, 4, and 7 of the Palm Springs Subdivision to Planned Development. The Ordinance restricts housing types in this area to "new construction" and "modular and pre-fabricated buildings" are prohibited. At the request of the Palm Springs Homeowners Association, the Ordinance sought to maintain or upgrade the quality of development in the neighborhood by establishing, among other things, minimum floor areas, setbacks, and parking requirements, maximum height limitations, and acceptable housing types. r Approver for Agenda /�-e-` ate Item # First Reading C.I/ � j Secc,id Reading �Public Hearing G'd Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item GP-2-83 (Proposed Resolution No. 83-63) February 29, 1984 Page Two In 1983, the development of mobile homes and travel trailer parks near conventional homes increasingly became an issue in the City. People living in conventional homes felt threatened with the .•. encroachment of trailer development in their neighborhoods. They cited diminished property values, a design clash between the two housing types, increased traffic and other perceived ills as reasons for opposing such projects. Protest petitions opposing trailer development rezonings were being filed with the City and a moratorium on further trailer development was being discussed at that time. The first amendment to the City' s General Plan (GP-1-83) sought to address this issue, among others, on a policy level by restricting by designation certain areas of the City to "Conventional Housing Only." This amendment was adopted by the City Council by Resolution No. 83-62 on December 20, 1983. Mr. Balio petitioned the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 27, 1983, to have a second General Plan amendment considered designating units 10, 11 , 12, and 14 of the Palm Springs Subdivision for "Conventional Housing Only" as these areas were not zoned Planned Development and, therefore, unprotected under Ordinance No. 94. No objections to this Plan amendment have been received. At the Commission meeting of January 10, 1984, the Commission was advised by the City Attorney that the term "Conventional Housing or Conventional Construction" needed to be defined in order to enforce the City policy. A subcommittee consisting of Richard Taylor, Ken Sanchez, George Baljo, .�. Ilene Taylor, Richard Oltman, and Jim Nakagawa met on February 9, 1984 and February 15, 1984 to develop such a definition. The definition for conventional housing as suggested by the subcommittee is as follows: "Homes constructed on a permanent site using individual structural components and requiring normal phase inspection by the City Building Official ." One further note, areas designated for conventional housing does not preclude other types of development allowed under special use permit as long as it is of conventional construction. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item GP-2-83 (Proposed Resolution No. 83-63) February 29, 1984 Page Three "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that Resolution No. 83-63, 'A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ENTITLED, 'APACHE JUNCTION: 2001 , APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ' ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 82-01 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 82-48 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED, 'APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, ' SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED ' REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, DATED OCTOBER 31 , 1983, ' be recommended to the Apache Junction City Council for approval ." Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Resolution No. 83-63, "A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ENTITLED, 'APACHE JUNCTION: 2001 , APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ' ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 82-01 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 82-48 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED, 'APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, ' SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED ' REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, DATED OCTOBER 31 , 1983," be and hereby is (approved) (denied) . JAN:mas RESOLUTION NO 83-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ENTITLED, "APACHE JUNCTION- 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN," ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 82-01 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO 82-48 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED, "APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP," SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED "REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1983 " WHEREAS, on July 20, 1982, the Apache Junction City Council did adopt a City General Plan entitled, "Apache Junction: 2001 , Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," by approval of Resolution No 82-01, said document being declared on the same date as a public record by passage of Resolution No 82-48, and ;;' WHEREAS, on December 20, 1983, the Apache Junction City Council did adopt by Resolution No. 83-62 an amendment to the Apache Junction General Plan (GP-1-83); and WHEREAS, A R S 9-461.05(F) requires that the general plan proposal, or any amendments thereto, be circulated for at least sixty (60) days to certain stated groups, and the proposed amendments were distributed on October 17, 1983 as required, the sixty (60) day review period having expired on December 17, 1983, and WHEREAS, the map entitled, "Revised Apache Junction, Arizona, 2001 Land Use Map, dated October 31, 1983," is declared to be a public document, three (3) copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, and which map is hereby incorporated, by reference, as if set forth herein, and which sets forth proposed amendments to the said Land Use Map, and WHEREAS, said Map of the proposed General Plan Amendment (GP-2-83) indicates an area requested for designation as "Conventional Housing Only" to be bounded approximately by South Winchester Road, East Southern Avenue, South Mariposa Road, East Navajo Avenue, South Royal Palm Road, and East Hondo Avenue; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been properly advertised and distributed, and public hearings, as required by the Arizona Revised Statutes, have been held, and WHEREAS, the general public has been afforded the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments, these comments receiving dutiful consideration, and WHEREAS, the Arizona Revised Statutes do provide for the ,� �� ti Y: ;A subsequent amendment of adopted general plans; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, as follows 1. That certain document entitled, "Apache Junction 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," is hereby amended as set forth above in this Resolution 2. That certain map entitled, "Revised Apache Junction, Arizona, 2001 Land Use Map Dated October 31, 1983," is hereby adopted and made part of the Land Use Map in the "Apache - Junction 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan " 3 That "Conventional Housing" be defined as, "homes constructed on a permanent site using individual structural components and requiring normal phase inspection by the City Building Official " - RESOLUTION NO 83-63 PAGE TWO PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 "I1 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST - ='� Kathleen Connelly { City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City ttorney ,j C i 1 . i 1 GP-2-83 PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 83-63 REQUEST FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (MR. GEORGE BALJO) "REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 2001 LAND USE MAP - OCTOBER 31, 1983." IE. BROADWAY AVENUE cc E. 9TH AV . 0 U cn E. 10T yI � 11111 y�91- 60 E. DESERT AVE. n cc E. ESTAVAN AVE. E, FRED AVE. P ,sac y ., . :; cc PVE Ao E. FRIAR a GRPNP'VP `" P vE I Q ao- NpN�p • W tam---- --- -- U I 1 A q E. KACHINA ` E. 17TH AVE. cc . I 1 cn . rx N I E. LINDA I AVE. I- i 1 ¢ a 1 oN E. 18TH AVE, o a F- _ E, MESQUITE AVE. - •- N I E. MESQUITE AVE co E. MONTEBELLO AVE, N E. 19TH AVE. srx li ..:; ; z ,v:, E. NAVAJ0 AVE. E, 20TH AVE b E. OSAGE ---- -- - -- --I . E. 21ST AVE. o E.-OSAGE AVE, o E. PEPPERTREE AVE, Q cal o E. 22ND AVE. z cc o CCI E. QUAIL AVE. Ix a 5 E. 23RD AVE. owo I N cn E. SOUTHERN AVENUE N --- BOUNDARY OF AREA REQUESTED FOR CONVENTIONAL HOMES ONLY SCALE - 1"=600' ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES /61 $' ITEM # MEETINGL/6) OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: r)(/ 1911A1A---- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH I COUNCILMAN! SHANKS 1 V 1/v(// COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO NICE MAYOR EIDSON 1 MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL y a� - .. v s '.is.r ?;M4 ITEM NO . 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT RESOLUTION NO . 83-63 , A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , GENERAL PLAN , ENTITLED , "APACHE JUNCTION : 2001 , APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , GENERAL PLAN , " ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO . 82-01 ON JULY 20 , 1982 , AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO . 82-48 ON JULY 20 , 1982 , AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED , "APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , 2001 LAND USE MAP , " SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED "REVISED APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , 2001 LAND USE MAP , DATED OCTOBER 31 , 1983 , " BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO , 219 P7-32-23 THE APPLICANT IS RANDALL INDUSTRIES 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED PsACHEdo O ! �' .Ns ...A ' PIZOX\lP COit o &ipache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 12, 1984 Approver for Agenda 4a., — Date Item # First Reading `ail //' Second Reading MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL —public Hearing Otd Business THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ Q New Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR / Consent Agenda PREPARED BY: ',, 1 JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ,-....,- SUBJECT- ('" REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-32-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-32-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 219, is a request by the applicant Randall Industries to rezone their property from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development. The applicant is proposing an 81 -lot townhouse project. The site is a vacant 10-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in - Section 28. It is designated Low Density currently, and Medium Density at the time of pre-preliminary filing, on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile homes, houses, and apartments. Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments Two protest petitions were filed with the City. The signatures are those of Michael J. Schmidt whose property, within 150 feet, represents 50 percent of the area on one side, and the Bullards, Dunnagans, and the L 'Odenses whose property represents 100 percent along the front. These are, therefore, valid protest petitions. In order to receive approval of this project, the City Council must approve it by a three-fourths vote. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219) March 12, 1984 Page Two The companion preliminary plat (SD-5-83) was approved by the Subdivision Committee on January 19, 1984. If a decision is made to approve the proposal , the Council must find that this Planned Development complies with all six criteria set forth in Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. Final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways. The earlier drawings submitted by the applicant proposed a design that did not meet the intent of the Planned Development Ordinance which is to encourage creative design, diversify the relationship of various uses, structures, and spaces to counteract the effects of monotony. The site plan gave a strong linear and monotonous character to the development. The perspective renderings did not show the diversification of spatial relationships and the quality detail work found in the Sutton Place project which was to be the model for this project. A new set of revised architectural drawings showing a far better design was presented at the Commission hearing. There will be a few minor changes required to the preliminary Planned Development site plan if the City Council approves the project. City Engineering and Fire Department stipulations will be recommended before approval is given by the City Council . Of particular concern in this project and others is the proposal for a perimeter wall . Such walls are often five to six feet high running parallel to the street and intended to give the future occupants a measure of privacy and sound attenuation. Unless the linear pattern of such walls is broken up by recessing some sections of the wall and alternating the heights, a monotonous character and "tunnel " effect to the City' s overall urban landscape is gradually created. Therefore, it is the planning staff's recommendation to also include a stipulation that the '^ perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals, that the wall heights vary from 3.5 feet to 6 feet, and that landscaping along the street frontages consist of naturalizing or native vegetation such as Palo Verde trees, Ocotillos, palm trees, barrel and Saguaro cacti . The current General Plan designation is Low Density. The designation was Medium Density at the time the applicant submitted pre-preliminary Planned Development plans and the proposal conforms to the Medium Density designation. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Polomskey/Vehon 4-3-0) The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219) March 12, 1984 Page Three "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-32-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 219, application of Randall Industries for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and Fire Department. 2. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide. 3. The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits. "The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . The request conforms to the General Plan. 2. The request conforms to Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. It is the highest and best use of the land." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas „oft. .�. - ORDINANCE NO 219 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT �..� SECTION I IN GENERAL 1 The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as• The Southeast ; of the Southwest ; of the Northwest ; of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development. 2 The approval of the zoning district classification incorporates, by reference, the preliminary approval of the Planned Development, including all materials and documents as submitted by the applicant, and the development of said property shall be in accordance with said Planned Development application conditions, provisions, and =- = stipulations, and as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance The application includes the "Street Light Agreement,” and if executed as part of this application, the "Agreement for Maintenance of Landscaping Within City Rights-of-Way " 3 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, fire hydrants as per approved plans of the Apache Junction Fire District for this Planned Development 4 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, off-site street improvements as set forth on the Planned Development plans in compliance with design details approved by the Director of Public Works SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor i► /R. ORDINANCE NO 219 PAGE TWO OF TWO ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. - 1 David . A exander City A torney • • .�. RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 219 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-32-83 , application of Randall Industries ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 219 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHF JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION. ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO _ CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY - CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL 1 The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and Fire Department. • 2 Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide 3 The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits 4 That the perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals. and that wall heights vary from 3.5 feet to 6 feet. 5 Landscaping along the street frontages consist of naturali7inq • or native vegetation such as Paln Verde trees Orntillns, palm trees. Barrel and Saguaro cacti. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE. - OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) Ask i`► APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Cash Receipt No.'�6 62 AmountZ�lo Date 11-i Case Number f Z TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel - numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed) Parcel 1 Frpm _GR (- . I To CR-5 /FD Parcel 2 . Parcel 3 Parcel 4 —_ Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28, _ T 1N , R 8E , FINAL COUNTY, Az 4 The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & eneral location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance ran nearest mapped street) ' 10 0074 ACRES ± NORTHWEST OF 16TH AVENUE & WINCHESTER - (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate .�... signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting? DOES NOT REFLECT HIGHEST ANn RFST H&c 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer �k ...` _ AREA DEVELOPING INTO A RESIDENTIAL/URBAN COMPLEX 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the community or neighborhood, as the case may be? - Explain N/A 4. Other reasons for the subject request. Page 1 of 2 pages - _ _ 5 `Y ODescribe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures. EXISTING - VACANT LAND PROPOSED - 81 TOWNHOMES WITH RECREATIONAL COMMON AREA Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit same in erson to Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the aopli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner zuthorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) 45/i/9rlrc huvritief/!. i°0 eax 24cJf /five,A. Ps18L CCa1) 8jY-o/73 (Name of applicant or representative) ((Address) (Phone) (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name & Address of person to whom petition & notices should be mailed) k4,1 , itAr Zz /f03 �Si_ .tus o applicant) (Date) - *Note Plans are required when application is filed for following Special Use Permits under Section 2302; Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, 'Nailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks RECE1VE� No 2 2 1983 • DEPT. or- PLANNING �I Page 2 of 2 pages �� PZ-32-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219) PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT --I i i I LIMITS OF ZONING DISTRICT (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL) - . ' - - - - . - 0 0 le el die CR-1 i E. FRED AVE. 0 0 ses,c26 - i 14 I I.® 33 CR-S/P-) 4" - ' I Q E. FRIAR AVE. SUBJECT SITE ®® a I � I � ® w I® (CR-1 to CR-5/PD) z ® =I .--., .. _ __ : .- , - - c9,,c 0 0 0 , _ _ ____. ., _ . . . .. . . . . EAST 16TH AVENUE 0 0 0 C-.) 0 14 13 12 11151 16 17 IE, ACHIM AVE, QCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-04- OCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-03- N SCALE: 1"=200' I I COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-26- COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-05- V •. •,. I, ,i0.,:••• ..,, • . . • '•;. •,, . . . •. . ..' . , . t ..,•,„ , . .. ,...: ...,• . -. •,,, • , .. . , ,. • ..I. . , . ,,..,, . — . . •,,,,,, •.:,, • .,, • .., .•;•:„ . ,. , • ,, . ., • ,., .., t • , . , .i.., , . L.) lq ji (\ ) , f . •1 fr,..._,,,,,, \•,,,,,.... , '4,1:. j ,. , ,-%--0 . If_-?_eal' 4: ),- `- .\4.1,4•7-<._;' , r -.--,‘,\/./.,___321,ii. "' iM t. n Ca! :,,titiet • -.4.,, /f,"„\- e-; •1 ') i 74 0..--- -j-4 e.-1 , ....-...".......... .,...2:,--......?,l•( e- 4 kek Vb _ • s.......•• ..11.77.:. ' , _-3,...-J...',......1 _,-rif t\1. _ doir.ififir 4 ) -27• ' 10/iTtlf(\ f,'f) i &6.i'''es, . )A.)L f• - , /.... • . . )1itYVT/0(kKk- ii)(1 ' ........--- •••<--.......C.). A 0 eic--A.\Ao(,....1::.r. OA.. •###i Ilit . .-. K'-',..7--'.-..,•••r'. ' ( 'Atik v.. . ,J4i• ......./'(fIrd-: • ,-,27)../. „, 10.6) VI';;4‘.2 , •,, P 10 v t ' t.' • .% ,a ,t- •i .. ‘,..±...,-0j,Ak...„2 . ., •-17 .r I. _10 ..., ...,, , t di arr.- v, -, . - •, -... •r. . . • !....;..i —3, #4- 7 . i ,, , ,. ,,,,,4 -,.. , ....,, _ — .!..r.,-.. . -• •4 . ::://7,,'-' , • v: 'P• '- '6,1•,,-,-,-,; -, - _ g,' ...,-..: .' • I l''.'',!, . lik "` '•. A 45,"P" ,4.... .u.ar' ..... "•, i .1 •,,,7/11 .' ' . 0 i A.14, ? • ".'.r. 6 .1 .' , 0a7,--J ... ,, ,.., ,_ ',,„,„ ,,,nwv- ...Air $ 40,7,,, i• A - iviiv_ilii.. .,., .\.. ., . ,.... f!, f,.. ...,,,,, .arl., ,' " , 70 • f. . -..!.., ..s ',....),,I,,-,7-,-.A_:. .AAY,''Oat.W. ,r .-' II. ..:••. 1 A14........c....-.Z.5..,r.,•:;',A' Al • t A.• ,',..4..".,r1hav ,, . I'-' INIeTik'sli. ‘lit',:'.- '" -:7, 1,:-._ ,•-:-'- t•--„::,.e. , ,.'''' ./7,,,,.,,..4-,-.. ot allif.7.-lk--1.-..--400.".7.-;‘,. ' 1 ;. ‘''.. •,4tztratz-,;:* ,,, ' •-• if,Ifili ' Lori L!,.‘., ten,-,1\hw ,,,,.,,:•,.,.. :......, . . _ _ ,,,...; :.• ,... •,.. ....it, — '''..,--1.-f._• •.•••••.0,, --. ...- -, -,......-- ..,...-•.••:•••-::::-:„-:.• -. • . •••• !..,,...“.. , ; '''•wi' N', *-,,„,c''.'-• 1'III ......d.- -• '.4:..-- ..••,. .. .'".-_ - "-.4 : . ,... 1211.1t;..*/:;•:`-' 1.- --'''7.-:-''.. 4'. • . ,•. -•••• . ../ v., ..' st, , • .... • - ,-- -A'' 1. ..: r, .Pr 41' ' ... ... ..1..•'''''''''''''''' -f 11-: . ..'...--.-- • • '. , i. ,,,.,„ 'No ; ...,•"11.-- ,,:•-• . •'. , . ;: r,„ ,z,.,,,-..f. -.::•:;.•-• .. . -. • • .. Ati . 1 I ..:: ,-... i tl.genets... • :,-. . ,.. ....,• .... . . . . r '''''' ' •-• •,..• • I , . ..• t ,:.• • .1/4.•1/4, , I,• ,1-.( ./..i.•:*, Jr•i y?IF, • • . - .,.: ,.,t .. .......,..i !. .- — , ,.. k - •. .. . , i ) . l•• •• ,..• i.. 1.-- ...iv, -...•.', 3;• • .. ,.: :P , ; i . ';*.: -:: -4.:3b.fk ri d 41i ...•7.Zaik." '-..- ''''"..-.7..if-A ' ----1----77"— lit,' 1 VEVIIIIJAA T--.'.2. .71411411*: '. •' ;;Jtf __ ,,,,,, :4, . ..i.g •:.„, : ,r__ _.._,,, _ .,__ . .• _ , , , a:,,i''' ,'7.•'' '..''';iii;'..4,:: ,•',! '4 ';'.1,11.., 1' • , ' --f-- r ' i , 1 i y - -,•,..r--. . ,, 1 s ;11/:„.._ ....k ' 6"''.'11r,6, 41''• i *,, ‘lik7111 ' ''" ,.... ... ... . , _.----- .--/ 1 a - • -4440..i.•• „ '• " N ' ../..... ....,.. _ . .. 1... `4•: . I, " '1;4.6..;- .."14k1 i --.... '',S'1, , , - ' - /I" -' ,fe" - •• 4' "1 t.7 t I , ' ''..,. _..----- pl. . _...,. .4,--....... ‘44/1 1.•NA 7 i'.77..... ......, _ . )Ilk .- -...-: ' --AN--.-.• 4 .. ,,h b . ;v14 _/.4111&!•4 AV 4tri. k i . ...... ___R.;ir • ,(, PZ-32-83 • r'.18 •.' . 1 ., i ‘1 4 S t r e e t s c a p e Quail Run Townhomes it.',-. • PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PZ-32-83 Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen originated petition. We, the undersianed residents of Apache Junction, do hereby PROTEST the proposed rezoning of properties described as: The southeast ; of the southwest < of the northwest of section 2P, Township 1 north, rance 8 east, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, :iral County, Arizona. REASONS TC PROTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1 . Proposed planning and zoning change PZ-32-83 should not have been Granted a public hearing because: a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the Zoning Ordinance. b. You are bypassing the citizens right4s by disregarding the petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification of property. 2. We don't want the higher density which will be a 400% increase 81 units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1. 3 . Increased traffic. 4. Additional noise. 5. This 10 acres which is a part of 80 acres bounded by Broadway on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho the west has been CR-i since 1974. People have bought land and built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential zoning. ,� �.. if5r) 6 . We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to des-troy.. t o established economic or social uses of adjacent or surrounding properties. �EQ N u 198 7.Is a neighborhood area and should not be split up. 8. Is the only CR-1 south of US 60 privately owned in the;zitp.PL-PNNiNG There is a need for such a parcel. 1„, 1. /00% 9. We represent of the property owners bounding on one side of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 300 ' . ARME DESCRIi'TION OF PROPERTY DATE cG"� - q_ �K � g 77 &_tt Vie (6 - tf(/' /124 5 a2tt, 614.0, 0..1 9 _ /d 4 4ce PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PZ-32-83 Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen originated petition. We, the undersigned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby PROTEST the proposed rezoninc of properties described as: The southeast ; of the southwest of the northwest 1 of section 2P, Township 1 north, range P east, Gila and Salt .�. River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, rinal County, Arizona. REASONS TO PROTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FCLLOWS: 1 . Proposed planning and zoninc change PZ-32-83 should not have been oranted a public hearing because: a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the Zoninc Ordinance. b. You are bypassing the citizens rightts by disregarding the petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification of property. 2. We don't want the higher density which will be a 400% increase 81 units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1. 3. Increased traffic. 4. Additional noise. 5. This 10 acres which is a part of PO acres bounded by Broadway on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho the west has been CR-i since 1974. People have bought land and �- built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential zoninr. 6. We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to destroy the established economic or social uses of adjacent or surroundipg, � y ~ properties. .� Fw R<.;Y `,1 T�,_' Y = ' 7.Is a neighborhood area and should not be split up. 8. Is the only CR-1 south of US 60 privately owned in the city. There is a need for such a parcel. 9. We represent 66% of the property owners bounding on one side of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 150' . ARMS _ DESCRIITION OF PROPERTY DATE 4, % I/� OR ADDRESS ��/ILt lL I _ l�/t//‘ J / lJr=� / •L� _( _J LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING at the West quarter corner of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, .•. Arizona; thence East (assumed bearing) along the southerly line of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the North- west quarter of the said Section 28, a distance of 660.64 feet to a point, said point being the Southeast corner of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the said Section 28; thence North 00 04 ' 45" East along the easterly line of the said South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of 40.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence West along a line being parallel with and 40.00 feet northerly of the said southerly line of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of 181.84 feet; thence North 00 05' 23" East, a distance of 48.82 feet to a point marking the beginning of a curve to the Right and having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence along the arc of the said curve through a central angle of 410 24 ' 35", a distance of 36.14 feet to a point marking the beginning of a reverse curve to the Left having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence along the arc of the said curve through the arc of the said curve through a central angle of 1670 23' 52", a distance of 146.09 feet; thence North 350 53' 55" West 165.77 feet to a point on the northerly line of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the North- west quarter of the said Section 28; thence North 89 59' 45" East along the northerly line of the said South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of 333.58 feet to the Northeast corner of the said South half of the South- west quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28; thence South 00 04' 45" West 289.81 feet to the True Point of Beginning. k ��r /9(S-7/ I PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PZ-32-83 Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen originated petition. We, the undersigned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby PROTEST the proposed rezoning of properties described as' The southeast 44 of the southwest < of the northwest of section 28, Township 1 north, range 8 east, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. REASONS TO PROTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FGLLOhS: 1 . Proposed planning and zoninc change PZ-32-83 should not have been granted a public hearing because' a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the Zoning Ordinance. b. You are bypassing the citizens rightts by disregarding the petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification of property. 2. We don't want the higher density which will be a 400% increase 81 units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1. 3 . Increased traffic. 4. Additional noise. 5. This 10 acres which is a part of 80 acres bounded by Broadway on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho the west has been CR-1 since 1974. People have bought land and built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential zoning. . 6. We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to destroy the established economic or social uses of adjacent or surrounding properties. 7.Is a neighborhood area and should not be split up. 8. Is the only CR-1 south of US 60 privately owned in the city. There is a need for such a parcel. 9. We represent 66% of the property owners bounding on one side of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 150' . ARMS DESCRIi'TION OF PROPERTY DASE OR ADDRESS- , _-'-a/,�" 'rt., (47, (=cc,l �/y�'� • • • • • ITEM NO . 4 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 219 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO , 239 P7-45-P3 . THE APPLICANT IS ARTHUR W. MOHR 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN' S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED << PQp.CHF✓G 'L U , I Z q,pIZONP V ity 4 c4 pache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 Approver for Agenda Item First Reading ( MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading _ AK _Ne Public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ !""' Old Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR `" ( Nev Business PREPARED BY: W JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Consent Agenda SUBJECT: .�� . REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-46-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 239) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-46-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 239, is a request by the applicant Arthur W. Mohr to rezone his property from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone. The site is a vacant 1 .25 acre parcel located on the north side of West Broadway Avenue, 165 feet east of South Delaware Drive in Section 19. It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile homes, and a business. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 22 Number of Exempt Properties 3 Number of Affected Owners 19 Number of Signatures 12=63.2% Signatures by Affected Area 69.5% Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Local Commercial Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-46-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 239) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Sansoni/Polomskey 6-1-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-46-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 239, application of Arthur W. Mohr for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Commercial Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the south fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . The request is consistent with the Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. 2. Based on the applicant' s previous buildings that have been seen, he builds good looking structures." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas ORDINANCE NO 239 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-46-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL A.7 . The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The East z of the Southwest ; of the Southwest ; of the Southwest 4 of the Southeast ; of Section 19, Township 1 - North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, - : located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or imprisonment for • a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST { III Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av ex Cit Attorney PZ-46-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 239 PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR—GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS / SUBJECT SITE - .-_ 8 0 '62�- - -' 14 _ ._. . . -. . . CI 01 1 . _. _ _. __. ., _ _ . :. _,.... .._ 0 56 0 0 1 •.. 1 _ ' CR-5 PD a 8F- 0 3 1 —_' 1 15 -J WA m 1 16 1 1 1 54 ra 49 9 -J C:1 ® I CB-1 1 z 4:?*.� �,, 8 00 `J 31 2i 16 , 56 1 (._, cn 8 0 cn I CB-11 1 CB-1 1 59 .1 - .. i _ ... W, BROADWAY AVE r--- -- --- --- - - 1 1 1 1 TH I 0_ I ca - I 151 152 I 28 a I 1 Q I I w K"4u,,•c..: x.; - .� : ,= I I A 1 - cr, 1 0 — COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 101-10— a — COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-13— N SCALE• 1"=200' C — COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 101-07— O — COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-15— z- j 1 - LIMITS OF ZONING — REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 239 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-46-83 , application of Arthur W. Mohr "oak ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 239 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-46-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL COMMERCIAL ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING - FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. �%► y =. _. = - The applicant dedicate the south fifty (50') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE • OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) • • • ✓�y�,.'..�iF'' -'C .'� 'sRs' . '�'� �, "r .c ..a: _ • vY}.`ii ' ':.� ,• e—t ITEM NO . 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 239 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO , 242 PZ-49-E3 . THE APPLICANT IS JOHN AND ALICE KILE 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B , IN FAVOR C , OPPOSED dink 4( PpACHE✓G l ,j O '9R/Z00' ity c94pache @9unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 Approver for Agenda Data Item Item # First Reading -%/' MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading ✓Public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR �� ' oid Business New Business PREPARED BY: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Consent Agenda SUBJECT: raj+ REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-49-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 242) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-49-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 242, is a request by the applicants John and Alice Kile to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH). The site is a developed 0.75 acre parcel located on the north side of Greasewood Street, 100 feet east of Grand Drive in Section 18. It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes and houses. Other Information and Application Requirements On January 24, 1984, the Planning and Zoning Commission authorized a Commission Initiative. Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objection to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-49-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 242) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the .�• following motion: (M/S Taylor/Conway 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-49-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 242, application of John and Alice Kile for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the south thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: The request substantially complies with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas ORDINANCE NO 242 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-49-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT- SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The west 100 feet of the east 200 feet of the West of the South of the Northeast ; of the Southwest ; of the Southeast ; of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the - stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY - If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM D vi F. Alex City ttorney PZ-49-83 PROPOSED ORDINAP'CE NO, 242 PROPOSED REZONING FROM CR-GENERAL RURAL TO TN-TRAILER HOMESITE r. W. SHIPROCK ST, '''I1 15 E4 �� 13® ® ®, 1 TH 1 L: ! H CD 0 A 0 1 ® 1 33T 1 0 II 6 6 10 W. ROUNDUP ST, 24 B ® �® 1 CR-5 1 3 1 ' D ® ® 1 1 1 25 G6 37 27 A 26 26 26 3' 26 A E 0 B D w 32 0 MI:1W 30 . 16 ca cc w A' 4 A iffillila� a , Z 11 G..- 14Q w 33 6 J Ec..) 5 0, o meal z U) «,��.. - ::i� yam,. .--:=:.-4 z Z _99__ 'l=` z I z 10 z W. SUPERSTITION BLVD. OCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-55- N SCALE' 1"=300' Pr SUBJECT SITE LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) -1 RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 242 e BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-49-83 , application of John and Alice Kile ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 242 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-49-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. The applicant dedicate the south thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes ^: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) • • e.�-:",��_.ra-J-r� -�K'�.•^.'4a�{�b.�•r,C•'rY,-3& = ,.�.:" E;, v `di �r'X Mi�tK+'S}x''•�� ~t`3aef'{r�� ,.. :... ,..- ..-:,� ,w •may a ITEM NO . 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 242 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO . 24E PZ-54-83 , THE APPLICANT IS WILLIAM J . AND ENA C . MACKENZIE 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED � PQACHF✓G O0.4 ! ti U Ijj. ` z gRiZoo• vDity &ipache c&unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 Approver for Agenda . Date Item # First Reading `�3�' MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading '/Public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ , Old Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTORf New Business Consent Agenda PREPARED BY: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: 4111'. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-54-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 248) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-54-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 248, is a request by the applicants William J. and Ena C. MacKenzie to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH). The site is a vacant 1 .25 acre parcel located on the west side of North Gold Drive, 165 feet south of West Tepee Street in Section 17. It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 14 Number of Exempt Properties 2 Number of Affected Owners 12 Number of Signatures 9=75% Signatures by Affected Area 85%± Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-54-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 248) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of .-• February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Conway/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-54-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 248, application of William J. and Ena C. MacKenzie for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: The request is consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas Almk ORDINANCE NO 248 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT . CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-54-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as. 1 The south 167 62 feet of the east 334.92 feet of the North z of the Northwest ,- of the Northwest ', of the Southwest ',- of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, EXCEPT the south five (5') feet thereof, located in Apache Junction, =..; Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS _ - I All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY • If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this [ Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for { any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000 00 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. : +rt PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE ° JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM D vi lex'a'nd-r City ttorney PZ-54-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 248 PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) . SUBJECT SITE SCALE: 1"=300' WEST FOOTHILL STREET 17B 0 20 a GR GR 28 j,.1A 1B 1 0 1 I I t W. SMOKETREE ST. I 91 f i 8C i 27 129 1 ( TH 1 t 1 1 1_ t 1 r ay..,. -_ ,. 4 I 1 1 35 1 l O .... I f I TH W 1 t GR . 1 1 WEST TEPEE STREET J Q 4E 4G 3B 0 TH zCrii / 3C GR 5B 0 6G 6H o (c.$) 1 Q 6F 6J 1 z 5E 5D Q 6B 6E 1 0 6C 6D - c W. SHIP ROC 3C K ® c,i- 8ABANDC STREET 12 L I ® 13 GR 12 TH t ® 0 sr 15 ---1 — e 4 GR • --�Q— --► -,--66 WEST ROUNDUP STREET N O COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-30- 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-29- _ COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100 35- - U COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-32- RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 248 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-54-83 , application of William J and Ena C MacKensie ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 248 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-54-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) • • !oft. • • • • • • n. ' " "`'--...u.+_,,�v�.K. 3 .�:a3.s.. °?'.">= _ x ^a '' - N • • • • • - • • ITEM NO . 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 248 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO , 249 PZ-55-83 . THE APPLICANT IS ELDON H . AND CARMEN F. UNGER 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED k AACH,-✓G O �' Z '143/ZoN1' Viti c� &pacIie 09uncticn DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 A2 Approver for Agenda ��Hate, Item # MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading ` Z/o Second Reading THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ , —ZPublic Heanng ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR J Old Business New Business PREPARED BY: '', , ` JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-55-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 249) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-55-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 249, is a request by the applicants Eldon H. Unger and Carmen F. Unger to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone. The site is a developed 10,200 square foot parcel located on the northwest corner of West Ohio Street and North Lawther Drive in Section 19. It is designated Medium/ High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding uses include mobile homes, houses, and vacant land. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 23 Number of Exempt Properties 23 Number of Affected Owners 0 Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-55-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 249) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion• (M/S Vehon/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-55-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 249, application of Eldon H. and Carmen F. Unger for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "The reasons for the recommendation are. This lot would conform with the existing densities according to the General Plan in the area and would also be compatible with the existing development in the area." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas p ORDINANCE NO 249 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-55-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The South 111 feet of Lot 57, Cayton Subdivision in Section 19, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT for = the East fifteen (15') feet thereof; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 19 +4eY 4yy „' ay Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM vidLox City Attorney PZ-55-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 249 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE i W. SUPERSTITION BLVD. •CB-1 77 ?3 - _ _ 58B �_= CB 2ar 01 82A . 78 '4 I --- —- [GE4, ----58A 1 0 16 ), 84 � 80B 76B �1 ---- � ��_.....- 15 87 � TH 5-- --1 01 CR-4 1 . . , . , drni., ...- 80A 7/11.4L411 CS W. OHIO ST. 9 3O O O I 6 66A O4O ---- F' 48 47 11 w . _. . _ . . . . 3 ® c _ _ • ,• ._ _ .. .. _ .., . .= .._. . . . , ... 68 b4 (-41 i 43 1 10 . . . .. . ._ , ... J 44 � k - c) - • 0 c) 00 . le i i___. ._ .. ,, . .. . . . .. .. W. VIRGINIA ST. O r , . .� 0 i 3 TH i 42 41 . 39 ® ® e e - 1 1 38 W. TUFA ST, 11 27 SUBJECT SITE SCALE: 1" = 200' N O COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 101-03- 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER - GR) Amok RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 249 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-55-83 application of Eldon H and Carmen F Unger /INN ,f ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 249 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-55-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, t- BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) ,e'f.f •iit. .:, .. . ._ , • r ) C7e.")— ) -- t.f n : A i 0-ay-Or' - or . '..:' . , ., . ; Z !!!,..: : . — . . , , ,. , . '----)-7,2)-,p' ze_., .._r-r -4 -i,e .J/-' . .i,i,„ . 11-(si -i.e,, I°2- { '';'' %.,'''' . ..' ,' .... • ta ‘ :..3..t......01 ,:, IVY •�Y� .i • � R�`.. yZssn�T"i'�"�ij�'.�'w.c:r1..r..,r..+.i;�:►. .► �_.,, vim....-�-..-.‘; *� ' ,. s ..s c:.....Z.%.-,'''''Co.,. ' '--. F?"--,-761#2'E,,,,,,y- ---,,,,y- --zi. ,,,,/ :",, f. V . ... . e-r:1? -1 -' --?-,eil=%' //2°"15' ---)71 Q",/',' . e '7 . 4'. '1. ' raj _ �.•. `+� i_ '. l -��9'""j'' / I, !, :.''vt‘,.., -I.•', , ,i;-)P-- , 0 , ( 7!Z/ . , 4 s — -. /7797-- 7,...----71 92..... ...—....7479, 5z,"..- 4 .....--er ,, , 4 - , ff'°-----12,V - -- 4 7'e /,4 )/' *07-1/1 - °( . PC'4 , •.,'0!'.,. ,- (' -',""2",7-1-7?-)90,- . 4.47 ,. ,:,), : ;. ; ,I,, 7e ..2:r- 7/ 4 g f , t .Z.,,:`,3 k.;,,, .4,‘, . • : (t4'Z:2 ,.,• K „. ,t ' 4:/// 1W2 4 -,/ - , . :,,,f. ,-;,,,.,„,,..: .,. e w 7 F y^ l ' . .,,,,,.,,, w. ,� .. ,�.x!ter.-c. _-,;.-; �r,• ITEM NO . 8 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 249 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR PI ANNFD DFVFIOPMFNT . THE APPLICANT IS BIDWFJ l FOR ROADHAVEN MAJOR AMENDMENT 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION . 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED �E J (:,§P.CH GC IL U t 4Z '1R/ '�ZON==- P V ity o &4pache 2unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '�--� February 27, 1984 Approver for Agenda Dat Ite . j 2 Item. .First Readirr� Second Reading`3 -- Public Hearing Old Business MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI New Business Consent Agenda THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ mot . ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR PREPARED BY: g JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER .�A SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 6, 1984 PZ-6-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 92) and PZ-19-82 (ORDINANCE NO. 163) - MAJOR AMENDMENT Project Description This is a request by Harry Bidwell of Roadhaven Resorts for a Planned Development major amendment for Roadhaven Phases I and II to reduce the minimum travel trailer unit separation from 19.5 feet to 16.5 feet, and to reduce the minimum space line setback from three (3' ) feet to zero. The subject property is a developed 93-acre recreational vehicle resort located on the west side of South Idaho Road, 600 feet south of Broadway Avenue, north of 16th Avenue, and east of Buena Vista Drive. In his letter of January 17, 1984, Mr. Bidwell mentions meetings with Mr. Gero where it was agreed that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions may be amended by Mr. Gero to allow 12 foot and 13 foot wide trailer units. Mr. Gero advised us that he does not recall any such agreement. Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments On July 15, 1981 , the City Council approved Phase I, PZ-6-81 , with the 19.5 foot unit separation. On January 4, 1983, the City Council approved Phase II , PZ-19-82, with a 20 foot unit separation. The DCC is not aware of any authority by which Mr. Gero may have had to amend covenants. It also appears that the City would not concern itself with the enforcement of private covenants anyway. Generally, there was little objection to the amendment request provided that there be 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable hayor nd City Council Request for Agenda Item - March 6 , 1984 PZ-6-81 , PZ-19-82 - Major Amendment Page Two a six foot separation between a storage shed and an adjacent unit and a three foot separation between an awning and a trailer for fire protection purposes. The Zoning Ordinance requires travel trailers and recreational vehicles to be at least three (3' ) feet away from other space lines and twenty (20' ) feet from other units or buildings under conventional TH zoning. The planning staff foresees some long-term adverse planning and develop- ment implications for the City if this amendment is granted. Proponents. of similar development projects would point to this waiver as a model by which to follow both from a design standpoint and from a procedural standpoint. One of the common criticisms of Recreational Vehicle Parks is that they appear to be a high density type of development that is oftentimes incompatible with other types of residential development. The requested reduction in unit separation would give this development an even more congested appearance. The Planned Development plans for Roadhaven were evaluated and approved for only eight to ten foot wide units as indicated in the attached drawings. No evaluation by staff and no approvals were given for 12 to 13 foot wide units. One factor that complicates this problem is that this project was sub- divided by the applicant. The lot lines are fixed but were approved as proposed by the applicant. In the various meetings with the city staff, the applicant was advised to design his project carefully and to allocate enough space for his '" lots to avoid being outdated by new technology and larger size units. The applicant assured the city that the design of Roadhaven as proposed was what he wanted and that the proposed space sizes were larger than the existing Recreational Vehicle Park spaces. In a developer's desire to obtain the most profits by creating the smallest lots practical and to obtain the greatest density, he limits his own opportunities to meet the demands of a changing market if he subdivides. It appears that this is a case where long-term project planning and market trends were disregarded in the design process and the applicant is requesting the city to compromise its standards by extricating the developer from his short-sighted approach to planning. The perilous implication here is that future developers may design hastily and unwisely but then ask the city to relieve them from the predicament. The Honorable Ma' •�d City Council Request for Agenuu 1uem - March 6, 1984 PZ-6-81 , PZ-19-82 - Major Amendment Page Three In dissenting from the other members of the Development Coordinating Committee, the Planning staff for the above reasons would recommend denial of the requested amendment. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that a Planned Development major amendment by Harry Bidwell for a reduction to 16.5 feet in the distance between trailer units and for a reduction to zero feet in the setback distance to space lines for Roadhaven Phases I and II (PZ-6-81 and PZ-19-82) be (approved) (denied) . The reasons for this action are: (list) Stipulations shall be: 1. That a six (6' ) foot separation between a trailer unit and a storage shed be maintained and a three (3' ) foot separation between an awning and a trailer be maintained. JAN:31 • . 'f L.Ink 2 i�n4 Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. ; 7631 Greenwoy Rood.Scottsdale Airport Scorrsdo:e AZ 85260.602 098 3233 .410 January 17 , 1984 The Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction , Arizona 85220 Re : PS-19-82 (Proposed Ordinance No . 163 ) Major Amendment -- Trailer Widths and Lot Lines Gentlemen : It is respectfully requested that an amendment be granted to the Subdivision Planned Development of Roadhaven Resort of Apache Junction . During the various meetings with Mr . Gero , Director of Planning and Zoning , it was his suggestion that the Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions of the Resort be amended by him for control under which the i. Resort would be conducted . One of the areas agreed upon , owing to the many changes of manufacturers , was a vehicle width of twelve feet ( 12 ' ) , later amended to thirteen feet ( 13 ' ) - this document was recorded and has been in use since the inception . We have been notified by Mr . Leo Frazier , Chief Building Inspector , that this Covenant is in conflict with the Planned Development requirements . Mr . Frazier has therefor suggested that a major amend- ment be submitted to the City Council of Apache Junction to bring the two documents in line and to rectify this conflict of measurements . The Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 /"� January 17 , 1984 Attached are the proposed dimensions to be applied and incorporated into the general layout of the Resort . Very truly yours , ROADHAVEN RESORTS , INC . Harry R. Bidwell President HRB : sg Enclosure cc : Mr . Leo Frazier Chief Building Inspector q: l ,$ • du • � �, �\ b SIni I N N lf ' , jN � ' ( i a11 i, � I ) ' \ / ca { kV r i , V41011-"w I \ /\) N lAl / W (v 15 � \c P 25- . ' . :i � i \ 2 - , 'Ai 1 ,..--- ..t. . 1 ..:::•\.:.::i...... .-... 4:...i:-:-...: :..:: :..:::::.4..: ::•:x.:i!:1....::::.::..li::..::.!:::..:Ii:::..!:?..:iii::..:ii::::ii:.,::ii:.:ii : . t.)), 1 "...._______ \ - _ •.:' _14 i, ‘17 ,, ''•• ,. \ Is N\ c\,,,i c cq <).1 c, (ki G, \ c, .\1 , ''\ G \,\ ..:':: ,N• \ s.,.. ,,, (., ; . . \\,,,,\I\ .„.,N ''s ik, \ \\.,._ s •Q\_ /` �'E aer. J / \ \ Np Op SED QRA{i4IG CHANNEL. G ev n; 13 19 8 8 I °o J, I ) ,, il, , I \ , r> I Co co ,N r N„ I �, Iln I o I KT p Il—r-\ SUN I VALLEY' HOMES SUBDIVISION 1 z 0 r 2 6' ' _Lill 8.5. '1 7 / i4 .......---„ if 29. co Z . I � � w / N681 0 0a .�(-ca-c.e �• . U / O c� � o Do N `"• I / w rn i '' 1_5 / • ' M / - 50' DRIVEWAY -- r+ / w i 0 63 S1. SC r4. /". .4<t.. , i 4 i' f\`: 1 \ �,� -I67/ ; �7H \ o� • i 1� ( ' I b� b Q 5, ^- /NOiCATc5 f/RE f/YDRANT5 �'�f°�cE �A 2 I- 168 T Z �) NOTES ht kill-k �. Q / 6'PVC W- TER e,,a1Q /69 m N' — _ - _ �i 11 -•> C) T`_ B"P,' > O 5 \\34\ —58 �� c `!L^ "'"1--4 4. •i a I \\178 7\-...\---. 776 /75 /74 173 -Y7e /7/ r 170 25 ``1 -N �,.e•o;e - 9c9�` 6v ch ,c. .a�3Q a_ So-" 3: 34 27 55--Zi / m• \ 4,-ea P6„c. Streer7 /7 ..'= Den 6,ey 935-.,rs 'c S�s3) — °p` 6fIa_ AVE•(1 i ti Q.ea P-mare Sr eere 5 9 C_ trJn Lot Ores ,G5 Sf ,\ ` ;, c ) Nee 4ree ?5 yA` Are Lcr Erea(A-er h'e) 7/29 3 P 1•.' 0 34 3� \31 \ T Cot s re (34" 3Q" Z 3Q' 55 T . ) A,e t Net Are.; /9 As (30 A 5 ) 90' 113\y \y y118 -119 '9120 121 b122 y123 1 L% 1 ��cin/ rc, s: ,9ENCN Ml0R/5 1/4 s 115 116 17 ��iti, -Pa,,:-s dQo 6'4 . . WATE BR/155 CAP EAST Of fEhCE POST•4PPROX - -= fir"' 4 "�" /50'N e 3 3' iY L!% ¢ /NT /DAr/O RD / h ------ e'Pvc C' �-0C298- b 1• J - �i>o/Hof B.Po4DrvAY 41E t -- - .o'Bert,-sCiO// c� 3�i�nJo f/vrd r/1a s/,,,,s o.s>. Cora: d,--.5% ELEV.'/70242 ••• �••• A 6io/f'Courac f'•Br Arty eQfo'1'• /%,\ � \. N 4 ;/f,/t,e5 I --- f1 I A ( ;, i i/ -I/6 —')— I — --�-- -r .., EzEL'TR/C - SA' \ �O 6 Ttl.P/•4?NVE- b9,'BE_-. \ �G e• nB.o../t s� PREPARED B Y: ' I C REFu3E 4 c R O/SPC34L SEPV/lE 1 ______ e__ v cEC,. d/107_R PALM.3-RR/AO E OR ZON4 ��-• 44ATLR COM,oAA'if 5 n 10 0, • SWEPT/c -.-43at/Sc GO/t ls/9t..'�v/!y-17 �� n I/ 7/// ENGINEERING 8 SURVEYING OF ARIZONA , INC. ;n o. -\ /1 eoa/,,rsn • 4 200 4 �'/ / i/�_ 0 404 E. 1ST AVE MESA, ARIZONA 85204 969-3200 \:0 •%.7 'TPhase / Qr �' c \ /��,« _ \ 0 t\ t' GOLF COURSE ARCHITECTS ` ' _ _ o �r/�/� 1-2 8453 N. BLACK OANYON SUITE /OP ��6b ��1`' ,'' PHOENIX, ARIZONA 8502/ 864-0444 -f �°/ -/ cr -,,,- /6'K.9aE , �,a,�ems(<l�i�P�o /.E, •- - '< i 1 . I I 1 I 1 1 _ - - +Zti i 0o • o.�Qa I i 4\is. 1‹ o I o I rt'i c •; . O 1 -426 a—k \ • oc't v m 'cs, day r 0 ^dam 1 1 O d m �Jo 1 —1 , \ 1 • r O ,00 1 O ,� oQ, r 11. f ss Cow u I \kO / C 002 �. 0 0 C'0J�11\ ROADHAVEN RESORT OF APACHE JUNCT ION ^ -y. rl {USOIVIOION OF►AAT OP TNL M11/( OF SICTION 11,TIN ROI,OliflIthi `--- ^ ---• FINAL COi*TT,ARIIONA us ••rI AAGAOwA• 441.64 ,r r M I •fl.it`^Mrv. A. JJi ate fWI.W.IWI.1 4 w a.ata My_ N1 IV Mil FN1L117 1 1 YNr 41r •• pus,14 •l lrr 1r•N1nr _ 1 1 ''-`.1 IrM�tl INlwr•Nrd1 alYKr 1.1t1011•IUI aT r lA Y Nl,1NY. ttil ..,.I Y1 Yu• • N 1 1 1 1111 L•NIIr1 I:r IN•11 r�•1 GI It _�• T 0.111.11 .11 1.1 1 iu[Ilu N1N0C.1.011 lllll ,1 M�1• N11 I • i al 1.A. of 111f11(116.al4 11 •Iwl I,c.111 MI •.l� 4Ltlt t[I{i�31/ILd l.If cu. PLr.,10.0 o. u w«uc Kuc•nt 1r twLlar �� 1 _� 1 [.�(IrC f111.LLR MRr1 r NI,,110 rduurl • N Iln Ilr uN ng1P: ,11 rY t •1:.,11 I.111 Ir f11r 1.•rN 1�1 1 1r d M wr _ i.wa,•v':S1ln[yullrr M•cL rol'1 (Door NN•1N1 rgYnn 6611 n rINt11r L IIn•I1Mr1 <1r1a1c1• ,d IN<,u 1 • 1r cN'�rlPl u N1l I'C TYlr I. w0 rrl,M1111 M •• L r Wl IwLL 1 UI I. N�.1N Ic11o11 N.r.du UM NLWI•l1r 1 F\ / Ir 111i11,.Wu.N.0.011.. r:21..MlelMaOMwr" llwullY i/ f a r 11c[VN r1 y N [•1•I10. +Nl N 1 �/ ' r I.4 P 11r1.u11.1.1...111111411611 ;r d NIL,,11 41 PO c1N11 LPIIao• (-\11k. _i R.,\•\...v. r J-��% I IIN'i .. a ll::,.r1«I,I;u1 F.TMl`.6.0/111Nf111Ya.. Id Ir LOVN• 1 W_ (11r• a•at;1;l-jl ., diPliall-tT.i1 i1[MI►• r 1, r 1 r ua rr 0.110 N tr I4[11 r I I,I1V1r ra..a. rllt u •Ir111MAI It .11[f Orl•Ml It•ct•( I,Nn 0.1 w f I.lutrllrl opts fN1111 a 11• 1 a V 1.011 W 1•r11r,11 N...10 111.11N 11.0_ a.111��411I01 i } _ _ 42)S � •� I ~In N'1N Y,O IIIN ull l.1•IINN141 p01....41•ai 1• 11.Aa.w1i1 N 4 1•.1 waNA•11.IKlull.• u.1 1.10. ..•mug e• H1 PD..11.11 f1(u1Nr1.N•OM Al la M ro.c a.1 11N r Ir wools PI1 sm..ue �.N•661.E 1 lr.. d.l uw11 d .4 e 1.N.11 11 I YN r •� S10Tt 1/NS011 1 ,IL 11:11 1u11 N1 M 111 uK,[»1::::L1N4,In L.ry x,t a Mrl:lt�61 d WM1N0 �\] / ..• I M.EWA INGIIS]tN4[FGK[II 1101Iy1 111r. 11 1,1111u•L Ncrfus as 1 1l1 .rr r N1t1r uaull0 01 n1 .a•t 11 Mw•rr4 O ( ANI TC AN INGM11 R&V CO 1 slum u1.1 N 1.11 IUI 11•ro1r./•vt.4 of Ir.lO 1Ve0 441 Nrnr M11Lrt11 11 Ir hRLlf fat w fANMpnI •vC FIf Pt WY a•4rur /(�T tN101N11 PRIM. IOW UKL lu/1111.Nf,11 Mi Yur r••r 1; 1 Irr1 Irrr•n • er11. 1 L1aN11rf �� 1. '�•� �• "`1 ..--. PI P 1- •1 un. 1 INuw N to ur r riu, s�/1•, ,�__ ry:i.uL NinNN I 1 �j WWI 4ML[[.T FM{Ir Y tltr•fr.r•IIN 0.6 r L ' . 1 1 01 ..�• 1Wrr• --MrIr1Tr-�� IA V i 1 00 g Ir.. u�^ r u U ,� l �� Y i 111p 1IM �111vt d solorrNr«•Ior sot `-1 111. ..MLt7.i1 IKllj(•1LOI 11(<N WK•1.1,I••. N 1 IIMY'1L�1L711L�11/1111�1 ,o k� a V w . N r our r 1::111 le N/r11V1'S IN 11 071 1 1 I Ir IN IrroN/I flr f.""1 11 1` two Sift 1r Iw Ven a M 111rd•IIN w10 Yllll (.FNNLI•1 Ir.Yllf It L 11 M SHEET 3 ..1.1 .0. • .a. •tat•111• up aI1f14 Ku -.\c - . _.- 1 ! ' _j11I1i / AMA >.( r-_- r ... ��y-� JL ...... •r..N•N •YINr[11 MI f111 taws d RN CM d Y1tN 1Wfllr Ir IJ•1--Yt d�C�u Yw �-\ • �•w M s/ - % _ _ Nat^ A ,�.U�i`.n`�L1 "r__ « Mu v• _.... / •� - Y r c •r1 rlrl N tr I d tl l[.MI a.i1 N,r•1xt/1 1NroNr•tl• ` / (`-) - 7iQ.. F Q Ku M 1.11.i JI Yr•r.rINrO 1.IN(In Lr14. J . Pt. - - _ - • NlLlr i/4.L W1 _ .•j / _ LLLppp��• b• /1 Iv u1 . I ! no r �a..� , •1 II I 'PIVI 1 IN 11r Noy r•IN 4^11r M1•I.1 I u1a1x11 i... .. .. . 0 V.d ui I:vriu 66ui u•nu w tl r r1 66ui l>v4:I:o,.uN1 1 Lw4. 1: 1 wl Ku tl11Wt 1 1,M Of 6611•n1WC11.1.....0.111.1l.IVNr 1• j % � � ' KfWNrc1 NI.MI l3�SM1 _J .' j'i r.N ..l I lLtfi([L'"" SNF- 1 r, 1 -\ \•- • ,xacml sY+r•raa.•.n ./,...:;• •/ / V�� y \\1 ,\� `1�`` ``\`\ • ,NO,C•!I( tWNR r WION,f14 NI Vi 1M n. ...LLC•L�.rF 1IAP h1 xat•111 PAM YI•.Ir 1•Kx(rt [ -T1-� 0 \r.Z. •r ao- nLl i �_- M� 1.•1•r11N um.AM I•Nn•11 1 YI N IN • ��M 1 K (�rT.\c\ .1.,. `- /•c•Ilvl [Iltl(1Lx lr IwIL r1 Llwltlr 11 r , >��I .�rl 1 ��\�\ Milo•.1VilKlr W fir••IN ..tl : t V N 1 V 1 e 0 1 0 I SON • .01011 NA 4 PO• •CR I AMERICAN ENVINEERING CO P.Z.-6-81 1 I _[Nu_ ,ARIIONA [a 10.NU SHEET 1 OF -_ - - IIIADHA APACOI ClI RESORT Of ROADHAVEN RESORT OF APACHE JUNCTION - PHASE 2 A SuRDIVISION OF PART OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T IN. R 8E ,G S S R B It M FINAL COUNTY,ARIZONA ? 1 .N ••,• rM ; II . I rnr n,w•I,r :Laal 1• AO- T1 '-. (',Ii•fL 1I.•I --.-ty/tll\I ._. ._- itOGG_ w.ff Atprt:wa•faw/rx'rr ;vwr, (.:..r Vaal a lore a.f«•.) • t � I ••^••••✓•I• . NiYr✓ I. • LA _ _ --.- \ .. I • ✓NI • I I ✓NR'IY ,.,A•,•t..'n ..•Mvii r,rN • \•;� I a \ '• '\. ,I I O. \• «. S;..•.s u•) I I `r.�....rrt�t‘-.•.. .rnwn I I fi*.:I:w,1 I,1t ( r..._�• t::::".1.j.," *. ..ki... r,t\'• ;A` ` _ -'•._' r._ .-if y , - G_ _' .'•r - rs7;Jtf„ S`1 '"6"5 - _- •.r._ -_. _!t%-7- -�]�,1 fe, r ri `f .\ '.a \ `\ :1 : ati u Sw:e/ »o« r�:3!fr,'r"JJ, .r �,.- .,,y` 9" ' Ip,' (I �• • • 1 ., 1 -... _., • r rl! �in N•� 4 \'" .".,'.1 A/ .i' ,,.2.✓SOS.",...; , 1...�.'; ✓.• .• ..c^w�,✓.rt«., ' rw Y .t ,«r1.�.':.�.\.G' - \ .+ r:'.s�" �1 ftt ' ram�+ "�fat �a i''�''•A!�' (..t•+ \r •�c. '\ a t ..l •lrr j4, a :�' �;, u i��. � `,,` \ •?�•f f. i •v '' Ma :•( \' •• \li,.• •5:?. •i '-a .•f!rJ» 'e•-'".34"'aa' fat\(f' u. .!It/a fIe if JAy kr 11, u ,�sri �;,. ua .e' I, !'• ! t•' 1. •.aol I,Ii 'i ' nac- :-- \'v',\ag:y;` \ „✓ ='(� U' «" .a t�s `flj"ts .t.: t r'.. . t��' :•,�..�( , �(..•C i..:.T.` c,,s'.;5 1: `� frf• "�' �ft! ( y.Y 'y,++,'f,/frf r ar ,r ,/�`,] I J' "I.' , Jrf 1' .t,W li ff.h ).,\� tt ri"ttly• . .7 Y-..I• .1 -\ ifo frl: i \t z , 1. < •M ♦:• }Jr! ai.{„• i.'"!X..JJ��'�I•� 7aa r/t, •�� • r .,., L�' I,t, t .• 'it t•, . \ e' IQ-rl: f 1'• 9 't.'' R .'' J J j r 1 v '!t:• ; .4 :' a:; « \ .•k`• .,e \ •t ice' .!• ��1T•=F';i;y. •fi,A-. �'•cV��$��.��aFi"'\t Yi A.''..j7�1•f!r\I,'#'J%. S Mat: 'f , ( . t• = 1 .I. ...• ar j t ..�'.J.tu. Ir•.•p•\ Jf . (`\q ,, I :..,' 1, 1.r..". •rn'�, fy 6*c 't"c r+• \ a;• r ( 1 I i 1 t ' •fft af/I 1 t ,fa 1: ...-tla de I•.r\ r►..: t t A V1,1 i'yr •I.1.a., w ;#•'. J l r"L' ac JP/ •r. • i • it __8r ..t*.- oI r(`- '--- I \•.,is. .; ,tp•I F _it, ew.� •.t': s.x 0:1, + " r 1 ) I ` i $�' ! "` \ rl; tP L''i fa',ti /1►Y k'i+ Y.•' I 1 ' IY :.I#,,1.3•(...• UrJ Jr11, ��,fe I fsrn•.:,. ✓✓�✓. \...-\•,. _, . 4ti \ ..-.•.. �'r [4iff �, fi -r w(,'; \4..`fro�f•\, r t 1s. 1 .I,•••3 rtt -ii 14.. Si'. i i.i1 , n .a` .! 1/ IY ifO f, ff , 11t.. 14 4 :I ..".e. \\\t'!� 'as :rttl 1,.t, a.� ! rIa rr�'� SS ,.fJf• Jll ii",�F�;, a.k;\a\a ,1p✓ ) {•• \ \<�.� Y !`.•\ ,{..11i�\'C� Jfa �:• ,; •1;.'" \ .�! Jf , •{1i., L tiw,rf. 'li \Y.\L.Eii11Y. t.Y, l.l' , i .t} i e✓ r ,r'.' r t.n•%.? �, r•' li,r -. _sri:'./�� - 'Nilr :•«�a,1�Y .` �. Yi S. \rt ,` ' . 2.\•�j 1�.. i`r.' �,. trear rr:' t �, Nee,rfo4 i'.. f I •...«r-a. , ✓. , ,. -Ir T p off f/ fa ff of f1 fa' >F' 1,+Z i c:iij. •C +� r\J n,St( \ y J.a�-::: •' ++ rYs, { \ rru ,r::' 1 .. «. \, t 7 1 ,, rq st „�j C-r\,..,,,,...\.. .\ �,..., .J• r\, -) \ G' /: Jn 1�,4 •'fu ... , �,.!,?.1. rpi•. tt`. .ate �. .-:• hfl:If/'Jtlo'`rt.1. ,n,f �,.� i h - iiii,! !ak{! FMfI ��.•!,?� ', ffo s. 1 ,I \ I• tat•. • ••:, 'rf. . 091 K -. J, ✓.o' 4.4 1 \ � ,;,, li•r_r:,1 s { • kt., • °sa4 k If a I.JO .✓.1.:i• T -, 1 t� q td..1 ...\•.. •,••p• ..,..It• • 17• .3 r f.\ to 4'• :.tZ t. .• t• - ( , rIf • I 'i`,N Ire•7•ee:.fJ?:,r.:'J??rr: t,J?'i on r�4. ••\\ / ;'z.. \\ �.-._ } "'rS* `\, fJ S •arii 6Jt.�,...••Ft,° t i . f1. I ':'�r :a l J3 ; (` }} f , ',' is J, � w.,l'-nte..C-A-Azi Lt (14.., .,;: \ IS``'.Nf i• li•••l'• to•it PO' J.- Al , II I ,fo ,✓n.4 '; :4I• aL , "'` ,,1 .1. J \ rl.er '! \ , I !•'~':{eae Y ✓..rf.•s rfotii� .9.. r bA•• • ,I !t' { Y," to \LI-• ,p. •"• 9I•cr r • �: I d'e• ' t) wr• I r .1'•.41,tIJ,S. i,• r off}•, ,1 I, I,✓ i;pi, L1"is - rf.1lrl• ...«. r 4 l :y�'!, . I w • s H•d� } • \ \ t l I. V. t' sai3." ? rfa i p., ,' 11kYt ,,}. ".".. ,,, t 4 ;....,A„+ d' .,A\\a -Al �1 t t. rr: P.tI -I * 't » 'c: i'� .. �•� \\ : I 1 1 '4;a':+i.nr, ''' �!''`of k • t.. C.• • _lau..�....t••••• t.\ ...•1 ,1.1 , , • ��r,� L s 1 \ ` ; .t,'{'„•'Ha i s" '�!: .!� ',•ap fr`bstr J,y\�rff ,S I.N, ,'1•'•. •i(7�:rrb,••-- •, i ! 3 r i ( s'•�'Y'.ti4',rf1•• \'' \ fJf,M••iu,� .i;,,'I'• � '•ice �1 ��.•'�.'.41 ..`.,i-J• '��` q I • Jr •J,fi Jl ,f\ fN •` «y... \t . 1• tç:1' : A. •J..r (!'e';1 nsfa. 1.-,•• , A!.••t0• t <' •. f"a L,• .. -, _ r..•. ..: . .<.• trra re,�• ,a' ,\.' .. .�a\Itl•tti'yI I(k• tat � ''.. .+-`C 7.,� ''• . 11 .,, ' _j,,sr�.L_I1•I.r- N 1Jt I •1: ,y'" •.r«. t a•• et rtttr1 \' r . t i t : to . f o !l''..• of• Ys-. 1 art ' •'ro! '"f i,I' YF f �._, �.:L•,, ••. Y •��•. ; i 'A-d'a.,�Y. ; .d• :.fr •iii:; .. «.r :oatp:79./ ioa Yn� r• .` `t h, . •t1, tt ki. Ir4C? •r , _ I is •\ ' 0' ',, VOWS.v.:1. \�P_ .',f'r'•I.•{{i:•,l• +t" ...... c • \ \ ��!! fir\• 1 .`v.�t• i/. 1 ros,106.,- •,rl i •••.)1 ( \ \•r'r�M .i. ✓w• � T:•.. ;•r1• in i „... Ora' la !f 7f.yl.M•\J» rt:.`ct tl: - •1,,%Jf Jp1 ; a •,ro ,M 4,LIa!,,ar�.1��\,Ia ',)L•S• wtrtJ f'�•11.1�•1a,; !b y i1 _ 'v -�F n•r{, lr!=�:wt t k \' J �1 ,, .V ua' I•N r..T,u7tl..! - � — � " .3 I t aJrtrt.,,a ,10 '1 __ r,.t- t•i 1 aw.l�a.,L. Q /tr ' O Je--- •{a \as •SU.'ra,. r` , ,,,,,,•! Y \«N .r ,\..1. ✓ :lr., \fl.. �/ 111 ae �e•so\ao tt1,Ii .,Vkf:V, .,a✓.t rwyun 0,1 \•1k 1a4)..IM Iu'ui"-V,.ry, n`\tees`_ vuhkroa:• '9' 004,E .4(�f•\(,'.'l,• of•I(,fifc,i\� •-.uf.if+�F ,e, •ei I tf �',�•t_• • 11` 1 1, 4, ••••yyy., , •�7,q�gg.� '-iro•'a an• \' w:� t .am .v„ . •:rin..T -L...yam1l•T 'I r..,:•.Y .n.Ttl� ••.•.nt•r ,w• rwr••••• {{r{ 1{ al��!Il.a'W ►ig�/ lls•f f 9F \f1.j.II rt .Op.'{pl,0f }-"..fti -pool, t«,I CI.f rY ,•, trr Cl ,rr• t 1 l..l.. r.dlrlui .Yr10.{•,1.• 741t . ,: 't J�• ,::C \` .�..'1....\ •+u�\1ii111��{� :.rltxr• •1 wa' �ue• v,rJA oltvt , ,..wr.aJ,1lI•� ,\.t:•Sc•v1.,tq ucr✓a ✓v, , •\.: r,D.r%.tui•rrrw tr �J"• '•t„r" I I ' I ( T ENGINEERING AND SURVIVING OF •RIIONA INC �a�ifio.1,.•••v - ...,.r.•..r... Hr•r ► j I t I I 111 . I r • , • . . .. ,w•ef•I•_••4 •u•:.w , ( I I I ! I 1 404 LAST 1ST. •vt r[f• •RIION►SSIO♦ I,• I I I A- 1 •..•.eon I.✓r e•I I I I I SRI•SI00 JOB IISI0s0I t4t1-t I Al I Ammi. Aft. TO: FROM: HONORABLE MAYOR Nina Bessent CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 2662 Seminole ,..� Roadhaven R.V. Resort Please consider the items listed below before you make your decision regarding Roadhaven R.V. Resort ' s application. 1 . The density ratio is below the 10 that is allowed by code. 2 . No additional stress on city services , traffic flow etc. 3 . City code allows zero lot lines in P.U.D. s. 4 . Lot owners purchased their lots with the C.C.R.s that permitted a 12 ' patio room and a 4-5 foot slide out. 5 . City has issued several permits that detailed a 3 foot setback on the patio side and N/A (not applicable) where the setback designation appears on the opposite side. 6. Future economic development of the city is somewhat contingent on the type of cooperation given R.V. Park developments . COMMENT: Roadhaven does not exceed the density requirements and therefore the smaller lots affect only the lot owners who have optioned to have a large green space in common. This should be one of the "Bundle of Rights" of property ownership and not cause concern to the rest of the community. The lot owners relied on the C.C.& R. s which had been approved by the city and have invested large amounts of money improving their lots accordingly. Therefore it would appear the request for smaller lots should be granted. LAW OFFICES O'CONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER, KILLINGSWORTH & BESH EARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION JAMES H.O'CONNOR(1922 1970) SUITE I800 FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BUILDING SUN CITY OFFICE HARRY J.CAVANAGH WILBERT O.ANDERSON :SC03 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE WILLIAM W.DON CARLOS JOHN H wESTOVER JOHN N.KILLINOSWORTH BELL PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING,SUITE 152 ROBERT G BESHEARS RALPH E HUNSAKEP PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012 10451 PALMERAS DRIVE GERALD L.JACOBS RALPH E.MAHOWALD THOMAS A McGUIRE,JR GEORGE H MITCHELL (602) 293-3811 SUN CITY.ARIZONA•5373 RICHARD J WOODS RICHARD E.MITCHELL ARTHUR P ALLSWORTH MAYOR SHANKEN RICHARD McC.SHANNON DONALD L CROSS SCOTTSDALE OFFICE JEFFREY B. SMITH JOLYON GRANT MICHAEL E.WOOLF LAWRENCE H LIEBERMAN M.E RAKE,JR HARDING B CURE WILLIAM C WAHL JR. DONALD E DYEKMAN RICHARD C.SMITH STEVEN D.SMITH STEPHEN C.GROUT ROBERT S KANT K DAVID LINDNER 4110 NORTH SCOTTSDALE ROAD,SUITE 308 J VICTOR STOFFA HENRY L TIMMERMAN PHILIP C.GERARD REDFIELD T.BAUM SCOTTSDALE,ARIZONA 85251 FRANZULA M BACHER HELEN L.HALL MICHAEL W CARNAHAN CALVIN L RAUP LARRY L.SMITH CHARLES L FINE OF COUNSEL JEFFREY H VERBIN MARSHALL W.ANSTANDIG CHARLES J MUCHMORE DAVID W.EARL KENNETH I TODD NOREEN L SHARP JAMES C.LANSHE RICHARD L MERKEL EDWIN V.MATNEY CHARLES F MYERS CAROL N.CAMPBELL SCOTT A.ROSE ALAN S NOPAR STEVEN R.HERMAN J DANIEL CAMPBELL.IY SCOTT A.SALMON RICHARD B.STAGO STEVEN L LISKER PETER C GUILD BRAN C BOND FREDERICK M GEDICKS A.KNOX KIMBERLY DAVID M BELL DEANNA DELMAR JOHN E.DCWULF DANIEL W.PETERS THOMAS C.VOLKMANN RICHARD M.LORENZEN LAURA W HILKOVITZ C.MITCHELL CLAUSNER,JR OUR FILE NO. 9994-6 WILLIAM J DOWNEY BARBARA L HINSKE DAVID L.KURTZ NICIIAEL R.PERRY BURGESS J w.RABY STEPHEN E.RICHMAN WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER DAVID A VAN ENGELHOVEN KAREN J.NYGAARD SHAWN K AIKEN NEIL O BISKIND 263-3843 PAMELA M.CRIPPEN GEORGE H.FOSTER JR CATHERINE M.JONES ALAN A.MEGA March 19 1984 PAUL C MILTONBERGER MICHELLE L.SEEGER RICHARD M.WEINROTH Mr. David Alexander Attorney at Law 275 North Plaza Drive P. O. Box Drawer L Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Re: Roadhaven Resorts, Inc . Dear David: Thank you for arranging the meeting last week between representatives of the Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. and the City of Apache Junction. Because the existing members of the Planning Department were not present when this project was originally conceived and because there appears to be a misconception of the problem involved, as evidenced by a recent article which appeared in the Apache Junction newspaper, (a copy of which is enclosed) , before the issues come again before the City Council , I would like you to be aware of a few points which bear upon the issues in this matter. Although existing Planning Department personnel interpret the Roadhaven PAD project as prohibiting units wider than ten feet, they were not privy to the months of negotiations which took place before the overall project was approved. The project was modeled after a similar one known as Venture Out, which Mr. Bidwell haleped develop. Members of the Planning Department visited the Venture Out project to gain a working knowledge of what was w AIM.4. Adak LAW OFFICES OCONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON;WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH &BESMEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Mr. David Alexander March 19, 1984 Page Two being proposed. Those who viewed the Venture Out project were impressed with it, both from a design and esthetic standpoint. It is appropriate to note that in the Venture Out project, the lots are similar in size and configuration to the Roadhaven lots. Eight foot units with four foot tip-outs are allowed on those lots and the tip-outs extend into the side setback areas. At the time Roadhaven first applied for a zoning change and plat approval, Joe Gero, the then head of the Planning Depart- ment, requested he be the focal point of all negotiations concern- ing the project, which he viewed as being an important one to the City. Consequently, many design considerations that might other- wise have been discussed with other members of the Planning Depart- ment were discussed instead with Mr. Gero. Roadhaven assumed that these discussions were passed on to other members of the Planning Departmnet. In any event, there is one point which I am sure of, and that is that it was fully explained to Mr. Gero that Roadhaven intended to sell lots in the project to purchasers who owned eight foot vehicles with four foot tip-outs. I recall this specifically, because at one particular meeting with Mr. Gero (at which other members of the, Planning Department were also available) the issue of tip-outs was mentioned. This was the first time I had ever heard the term. At that meeting Mr. Bidwell stated that the typical unit which would be located within the park would be eight feet in width with one or more four foot tip-outs. Con- trary to the suggestion in the attached article, such units were standard even then. During the meeting, the general issue of setbacks was raised. While I do not recall anyone mentioning specific side lot distances or distances between vehicles, I do recall that Mr. Gero or another of the Planning Department staff stating that since we were dealing with a PAD project, the City had the discretion to alter setbacks and similar requirements. When someone asked how Roadhaven intended to control the size and locations of units within the development it was explained that the developer would install driveways and patios on each lot, thereby fixing the basic location of improvements within the park. It was further explained that the size of vehicles, awnings and p LAW OFFICES O'CONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH &BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Mr. David Alexander March 19, 1984 Page Three .•� sheds and their location on lots, would be controlled by the recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and related rules and regulations. Mr. Gero requested and was given copies of these documents. In fact, he suggested modifications to them, which were made. Because the project was being developed under the PAD Zoning Ordinance, which allowed the City discretion with respect to setbacks and spacing, and because everyone conceded that the underlying TH Zoning Ordinance was somewhat ambiguous and limited in scope, and since no one raised any specific concern or require- ment with respect to setbacks or spacing between units, Roadhaven assumed that the project and the typical lot were being approved for eight foot units with four foot tip-outs. Because the tip-outs were not permanently attached to the ground and because tip-outs were located in the setbacks/easement areas of the Venture Out project, Roadhaven assumed that there would be no prohibition or restriction about the tip-outs being located in any designated "setback" area. In fact, in some of the original documentation provided to Mr. Gero, Mr. Bidwell stated that vehicles would be located upon the lots so as to not extend over any lot line, rather than any setback line. Some of the newer members of the Planning Department have suggested that Roadhaven never intended the eight foot units with four foot slide-outs and they have pointed to the typical lot layouts on the plat to evidence Roadhaven' s intent to limit units to ten feet in width. However, those layouts were only intended to indicate the relative locations of the driveways and patio slabs and the location (as compared to dimension) of a trailer unit in relation thereto. On the Phase II plat where the word "unit" is used, the dimensions of the facsimile unit do not correspond to any known manufactured unit and it was not intended as a limitation on size of the unit to be located upon a typical lot. Further evidence of the City' s and Roadhaven' s original intent concerning unit size can be found by looking at the history of project sales.. Since the inception of the project approximately twenty months ago, eight foot units with four foot tip-outs have been located upon the lots. In many instances these tip-outs IPA LAW OFFICES O CONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH &BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Mr. David Alexander March 19, 1984 Page Four have been located over the three foot side setback lines. Although there have been numerous inspections made by city representatives, no objection was made to this practice until approximately one month ago. The City' s knowledge of these matters was not limited to visual inspections of units upon the lots. Many of the awning applications which have been submitted to the City included sketches depicting where units were located upon the lots and many of these applications specifically pointed out that the tip-outs were located over the three foot setback area. Although the Building Department may have circled some of those "violations" , many of the applications were approved without comment. Further- more, even though a few of the applications may have had the setback "violation" circled, the applications were nevertheless approved and no red tags were issued upon final inspection. It is also appropriate to note that Roadhaven was not alerted to this alleged "problem" . Based upon the City' s approval of the Phase I plat and Roadhaven' s understanding that the eight foot units with four foot tip-outs were permitted (which understanding was supported by the fact that no objection had been made by the City during the lot sales program for Phase I) , Roadhaven submitted its plat for Phase II based on the same lot layout and design concept. Again, no objections were raised by the City. At this time it was obvious as to the manner in which units were being located upon the lots. .-. In detrimental reliance upon the failure of the City to raise any objection to the issues now being discussed, Roadhaven completed its multi-million dollar resort, complete with golf course (which is open to the public) and other amenities. Now that Roadhaven has completed construction of the project and has commenced an ongoing sales program, the new members of the Planning Department have determined that the density of the project is too great and that the development appears or will appear too "crowded" . Contrary to the suggestion in the attached article, the problem of density is totally unfounded. The lots in the project are twice as large as required under the TH Zoning district; the development has more open space than any other development of its kind in the state; Roadhaven reduced the number of lots in ... .� LAW OFFICES OCONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH &BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Mr. David Alexander March 19, 1984 Page Five Phase I from an approved plan of 840 lots on 45 acres to 665 lots on 50 acres; the lots were designed with a 60% slant for safety and convenience reasons, even though such a design limited the number of lots which could be designed for the project. To suggest that Roadhaven is or was trying to squeeze in more lots on the project is totally without merit. Similarly, the claims that Roadhaven' s project plan makes the park appear to be overly crowded is also meritless. The project could have been designed with lots which would have been wider but shorter (you will note that the typical lot is more than twice as long as required by the TH Zoning Ordinances) . However, under such a typical lot design, cars would be parked next to the travel trailers rather than in front of them, as in the case of Roadhaven' s project. This would have resulted in a more cluttered and crowded look and would also have meant a more dangerous park due to potential fire damage, street blockage, etc. These points, as well as the amount of open space which was being provided, were considered by the original planning staff when the plats were being approved. We now have different planning personnel who are focusing on one specific design element, without taking into consideration other points which were initially considered. If the setback "encroachment" and the vehicle spacing limitations were initially perceived as problems and were pointed out to Roadhaven, .•. contrary to the implications of the attached article, Roadhaven could have made minor project design modifications, without reducing the number of permitted lots in the development. When this problem was first brought to Roadhaven' s attention, Roadhaven could have taken a position that the City was completely wrong in its interpretation of the PAD approval. For instance, Roadhaven could contend that because the tip-out portions of the units are not permanently attached to the lot, similar to the situation of an eve on a house, the location of the tip-out in a three foot setback area should not be considered as a violation of the setback. Another argument which could have been raised is that since the units are registered as eight foot vehicles on their titles, measurements for purposes of set- back or other distance requirements should be taken from the eight foot box portion, and not the appurtenant slide-out portion. This is certainly compatable with the provisions of Section 20 . 01 LAW OFFICES MON NOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH& ESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Mr. David Alexander March 19, 1984 Page Six (10) of the TH Zoning Ordinance which was in effect when Roadhaven ,.. began negotiating with the City as well as Section 20. 04 (7) of City Ordinance 107 which was amended in August, 1981 . Furthermore, with respect to the issue of distance between units, Roadhaven can argue that the City is incorrectly taking the measurement. The existing zoning ordinance requires that the measurement be taken on a horizontal basis. The measurements taken by the City are on the perpendicular basis (perpendicular to the sides of the units rather than horizontal with the streets) . Instead of taking the above route, at the suggestion of City representatives, and in a continued effort to work amicably with the City in a spirit of cooperation, Roadhaven made an appli- cation to amend the PAD approval of the project. However, notwith- standing a favorable DDC committee vote, Roadhaven ' s application was presented to the City Council in a very negative light and there was no knowledgeable representative of Roadhaven present to rebut what we consider to be inaccurate information regarding the project. Hopefully, these problems will be resolved tomorrow night. As you know, Roadhaven has much at stake in this matter and must exercise all available alternatives to protect its investment and the viability of what we consider to be a well planned, designed and accepted project. Very truly yours, /14419,7411.1 Michael E. Woolf For the Firm MEW:fs/mk TH- APPEARED IN LAST THURSDAI R FRIDAY' S APACHE JUNCTION NE4'SPAPER ,.:. n ,,,r//81 tr% -;,. . stli ,' iiiii c- rokidi 4 1%10 . Roadhaven Resort denied width By Kyle Dugan 13-foot units started arriving." A request to allow 12 and 13- "I think this would be a foot wide travel-trailer units ,n dangerous precedent for the Roadhaven Resort, a park City Council to set," Mayor designed for 8 and 10-footers, Wendell Clarke said before the was unanimously denied by the council voted to deny the City Council Tuesday. change. Poor planning led to the request for a major amend- ment that would reduce the minimum space separation between units from 19.5 to 16 5 feet, said Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa. Harry Bidwell, the resort's developer, also asked the council to eliminate the minimum space- line setback. The required setback is three feet. Roadhaven occupies 93 acres on the west side of South Idaho Road, south of Broadway Avenue, north of 16th Avenue and east of Buena Vista Drive. In a Jan. 17 letter to the City, oidweli said he was told by former Planning Director Joe Gero that City covenants could be changed after the project was approved to allow the 12 and 13-foot wide units. The project was approved only for 8 to 10-foot units. Nakagawa told the council approval of the change could cause future problems for the City. "A developer could, in haste, design a project unwisely and then ask the City to extricate them from the situation," he said. Nakagawa said Bidweil had attempted to create small lots to allow greater density and asked for the change"when the • MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council of Apache Junction -dm+ FROM: Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. RE: PZ-6-81, PZ-19-82 - Proposed Amendment 1. Preface. Roadhaven apologizes to the Mayor and Council that, through confusion, it had no spokesperson present when this agenda item came before the Council on March 6, 1984 . Due to the importance of this matter, both to Roadhaven and its park residents, Roadhaven is especially grateful to the Mayor and Council for their willingness to reconsider this matter and to permit Roadhaven to pre- sent evidence in support of its position. When Roadhaven acquired the first 45 acres of what begame its 95 acre park, the parcel was zoned for 840 trailer park spaces. For its Phase I, Roadhaven acquired an additional 5 acres and reduced the density in the resulting 50-acre parcel to 660 spaces. In the process, Roadhaven kept 155 of the original planned lots. Interior lot dimensions for these were 48 ' x 35 ' , or a total of 1680 square feet. The remaining 505 lots were prepared under the auspices of Planned Area Development zoning. Interior lots are 63. 51 ' x 34. 64 ' , angled, and provided 2 square feet. The interior lots of the same size and design were used exclusively in Phase II. The matter before the Council concerns the large interior lots, not the small ones. Roadhaven apologizes to the Planning Depart- ment and the Council for its earlier failure to make this distinction clear. Once the full picture is available, we believe that all will agree that the amendment should be passed, and that the Council will appreciate why the amendment passed the DDC by a 75% majority with the support of both the fire chief and building inspector. 2 . The Amendment. The amendment is sought pursuant to Section 33 . 06 (2) (a) of the Apache Junction Planned Area Development ordinance. It seeks to remove any possible controversy about whether "tilt-outs" or "pull-outs" are permitted, as Roadhaven has always under- stood, within its P.A.D. lots. The specific language of the recommended motion is : "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Ari- zona, that a Planned Development major amend- ment by Harry Bidwell for a reduction to 16. 5 feet in the distance between trailer units and for a reduction to 0 feet in the setback dis- tance to space lines for Roadhaven Phases I and II (TZ-6-81 and TZ-19-82) be (approved) (denied) . " I March 19, 1984 Page Two This resolution should be granted because it is what was originally understood and contemplated in the Roadhaven P.A.D. zoning ,.. as to theStsquare foot interior lots; because there has been exten- sive reliance on this understanding; and because this is consistent with good planning. Most specifically, the Roadhaven plan works because the lots are longer, and cars are therefore required to park in front of the trailers, instead of beside them. It was designed to create and does create greater open space between trailers than would result from traditional TH zoning. 3. Dispelling Misconceptions. Roadhaven again apologizes that its earlier silence permitted the Council and various staff persons to entertain misconceptions about the effect of what Roadhaven is seek- ., ing. We will now provide the information previously lacking by answer- . ing questions based upon various misconceptions which have been reported. QUESTION: Will the amendment permit Roadhaven to increase the number of spaces in its park? No, all of the lots in the Road- haven park are completely built, with slabs and driveways in place. The amendment will not increase the number of trailers which can use the park, nor will it produce a change which crowds trailers together. For the past 20 months, 8 ' trailers with 4 ' pull-outs have been the majority of trailers at Roadhaven. This was contemplated in the P.A.D. The amendment merely seeks to remove controversy about this. QUESTION: Will the amendment result in a "squeezed look" by jamming trailers closer together? No. The entire concept of the Roadhaven plan was to separate trailers by length- ening the lots and requiring that cars be parked on the same driveway in front of the trailers. As illustrated in diagrams and photographs which follow, the Roadhaven Planned Area Development produces more March 19, 1984 Page Three unobstructed space between trailers than is the common practice in Apache Junction trailer parks and than is permitted by TH zoning. QUESTION. Does the Roadhaven plan produce smaller lots? No. Under TH zoning, trailers with pull-outs could be accom- modated in lots 32 ' x 49 ' , or a total of 1568 square feet. The Roadhaven lots are 37 ASV square feet larger. QUESTION. Do the Roadhaven lots represent poor planning? No. They represent very good planning. By parking cars in front of the trailers, rather than at the side, the Roadhaven esthetics are better than those permitted by TH zoning. Furthermore, the danger resulting from the explosion in a car is substantially decreased. Under the .•. Roadhaven plan, only the trailer directly in front of the car is near it, and 18 ' , measured perpendicularly, separate a trailer' s box from an adjoining pull-out. Under TH zoning, the perpendicular distance would be 20 ' , but there would be a car in between. The average distance between car and trailer would be 7 ' or less. t QUESTION: Was Roadhaven shortsighted; did it fail to foresee pull-out or tip-out tech- nology? No. The Roadhaven design was supervised by Mr. Bidwell, a man who had been in the up-scale trailer park business since 1972. When Mr. Bidwell left his pre- vious park, Venture Out in Mesa, 85% of the trailers there were tip-outs or pull-outs. Roadhaven was designed specifically to ap- peal to a similar clientele, and the expec- tation of pull-outs and tip-outs was a core March 19, 1984 Page Four part of its concept. Most of the inter- change about pull-outs and tip-outs during the P.A.D. process was oral. There are written records, however, in paragraph 3 of Mr. Woolf ' s May 15, 1981, letter to Mr. Gero and the park regulations supplied to Mr. Gero with the CC&Rs. Roadhaven had understood the P.A.D. approval subsumed occupation of its lots by trailers with tip-outs and pull-outs. QUESTION: Would passing the amendment create a bad precedent? No, to the contrary, ink Apache Junction should welcome any trailer park developer who wants to have what has been granted to Roadhaven. The Roadhaven z!. S' `76 P.A.D. interior lots are a full Mak larger than what is permitted by TH zoning; overall, Roadhaven has only two-thirds the density found in most large Apache Junction trailer parks. Its use of the planned area develop- ment concept has produced the commendable practice of placing vehicles in front of parked trailers, rather than beside them. Measured horizontally (parallel to interior roads) there are 21 feet between Roadhaven trailers and adjoining trailer pull-outs. j Measured perpendicularly, trailer frame to trailer frame, the separation is 22 feet. There is every reason to encourage the use of Planned Area Development by others to obtain these beneficial results. 4 . Summary. We believe that a picture is sometimes worth a thousand words. For that reason, documents which illustrate Road- haven' s position follow. Also, a much more detailed recitation of the facts are contained in the affidavits of Mr. Bidwell and Roadhaven. lawyer, Mr. Woolf, which follow. From these, it will be apparent that Roadhaven believes that the trailer spacing practices in the park were March 19 , 1984 Page Five contemplated and included in the original P.A.D. approval, and that the actions of it and the park residents have been consistent with both ,— the letter and spirit of the law. However, upon the recommendation of Mr. Frazer, the building inspector, Roadhaven has requested this amend- ment to remove any possibility of controversy. We submit that the re- quest is reasonable, appropriate, consistent with fair-dealing as well as the good planning which was discussed with and approved by the City' s earlier planning staff. While it is true that the City' s P.A.D. ordinance does per- mit increased density in a planned development, that simply was not the case here. Roadhaven will be prepared to show that retaining the same amount of open space but using 1680 square foot interior lots thelpro- ject could have included 1244 lots rather than the 1066 lots which ap- pear in the project. This increase of 178 lots could have been further increased by 50 more additional lots if 1568 square foot lots, permis- sable under TH zoning, had been used. In short, this is a good use of Planned Area Development zoning, and the Roadhaven practices should be confirmed. Amok p / • �� ' - oft f .G ' - a( '5Z ' - o" i If / / 11'-p I V • a I' 11'- OBI I ' - Pit 1j 111_ trII 10 I z'.0 it . ' ol, PUE. 6 of s'- o"torlat __.4.H.3.:__.e...„%le__,i_41...t_. ei_op 42+ ""' I � -a Imo ; I � ate. Ia. , 8"-o'1 1.011 r 1 I —o —0 II 1 . , . . I _ CT ! • , ' . .. .... CAR . '• ' TRAIL R SPACE SPAC AND I I. I I DRIVE J L I 1 I 1. ..iL...... ._lii ,...Li,_ • I . 1. ...1 ILL_L. HIT , . • _.1 . • •. , . • . . . zOi _,n .ir 1 SCALE: 1' : 10'-0' LOT DIMENSIONS : 32'x49' • 1568 sq. ft. INTERIOR LOTS PER STRICTLY INTERPRETED TH ZONING WITH 4' PULLOUTS (PATIOS OMITTED) . 4. 641 4. 441 -4 . G4I41" II t II t II + ,'♦ . 0 1n P.U.E. ` _ , 0 2 \ V V 0 \ \ G� \ G•A \ �G� \ \ Z11- C.II�\ \\ MEASURED HORIZONTALLY �ePe�e��\GJ � �� ' �o Q, 0 g0:is . (1) e \ S JP,-o J0PP Q1PS\'�� \ e. \\ ��PP.e.... SQ \L 1 P� • G G - \*: ' . • W SQ P �O \ . ... \ o SCALE• 1' : 10'-0' LOT DIMENSIONS : 34.64'x63.51' : 2200 SQ. FT ( ROADHAVEN RESORT INTI3 ;OR LOT LAYOUT PER P.A.D. ( I ' { / iZi- OI) # � Z� - 4u 3Z I - ,II i / Ili- pll f6' - a11 y# 111- 'II ' IZ�- OBI ��-/ iii pll # IZ1 - ell 1# I r f I I -� I , .„. _ L` 'r.� I + l *-` -�i Mork\ _ r �-• 1 I - -- fissr 1 I ( ELEVATION SCALE. 1' . 10'-0' INTERIOR LOTS PER STRICTLY INTERPRETED TH ZONING WITH 4' PULLOUTS QSO' - 0fl 51'- ou I I 3D - O 1 f 1 1 I i 1I'- O�� Iz'- ol� 11 - 0" 1Z'-off er 11l - Oil d 12'- 01� i I I te i r "V ._,,-- 4 __ --- - �. ,. II ( ELEVATION SCALE: 1' : 10'-0' ROADHAVEN RESORT INTERIOR LOT LAYOUT PER P.A.D. PHOTOGRAPHS FRO, THE ROADHAVEN APACHE JUNC1 N RESORT .x yam. R11 ..... :11, 1 ii.,k, II 1 ' - �r h p 1 i e y fi .Y4 '77•tR- xt i7T .a i• a, •H -.- - --- , •- r A' I - --" --.2' �• — .... .....--ii i : I_ .r=i ' 17 ,rri, `+r'ic'— y ' l y A ' ij2 - — AI 4•• .Kra:`k.. E -` a* PHOTOGRAPHS FROM OTHER APACHE JUNCTION RV ANL TRAILER PARKS 1. x - r `1 i t:,--js...., .,cri ., ; ,.k.,..4 :.--_ 1 1_ 7.1._:,...`, : — +. - . c r. : r ' 2 ,- y♦_ 1 4 _ k,n: --� - e. x - • . .. , s tom_ t• ,.,. {'i .�,`,1 ,Pc't- t, k mil tj.( -C: YV .'�'.3 1*° ?- ...c " .. u/ ,d 'i' — :�- / :---"Lt,- . Air t.,-' ' '.i.4—......1 .:4 Tir •}� r. lief "; �' :c ,Y 1 !: r k .ice` ,, ,,.a ? s{' , K R., ,' _ }sa!'� ... , { `may r• + r t..''"" I RV AND TRAILER PARK DENSITIES IN APACHE JUNCTION (50 SPACES AND MORE) Resort Spaces Acres Density Per Acre Apache Junction RV Resort 674 50 13. 48 Carefree Manor 115 4 . 27 26. 93 Countryside Park 366 25 14 . 64 Cortez Travel Trailer Park 175 10 17. 05 Desert Queen Travel Trailer Park 65 2 . 93 22. 18 Happy Days RV Resort 180 10 18 . 00 Lost Dutchman Travel Trailer Park 727 40. 05 17 . 95 Roadhaven Resort 1066 95 11. 22 Roadhaven Resort (without 155 small lots) 191 87. 88 10. 37 Rock Shadows Park 681 36 18 . 92 San Marcos Park 201 18 . 92 10. 62 STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss: AFFIDAVIT County of Maricopa ) HARRY BIDWELL, being first duly sworn upon his oath, deposes and says: 1. I am president of Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. , and am the person who is principally responsible for Roadhaven in the discus- sions which lead to the approval of Roadhaven ' s planned area development of its Apache Junction, Arizona resort. 2. I have been involved in the real estate and real estate development in Arizona and other southwest states since 1968 . 3. In 1972, I joined Venture Out In America, a wholly owned subsidiary of Gulf Oil, dealing with the development of trailer and mobile home parks. I have been in the business specifically of trailer and mobile home park developments since 1972. In this connection, I have made myself aware and I have kept current about trends in the trailer manufacturing industry, because these do impact upon trailer park development. 4 . I was director of operations for Venture Out, meaning that I acted as general manager for the 1 ,750 space park in east Mesa. This was the first RV condominium-type park in the State of Arizona. I also acted as an inspector and trouble shooter for Venture Out with respect to other similar type RV resorts owned by Venture Out in Florida. 5. I was also elected by the Homeowner' s Association at the east Mesa Venture Out park to act as vice president of opera- tions for the Homeowner' s Association, in which capacity I assisted the homeowners in the preparation for their taking over the daily operation and management of that park. 6 . To the best of my recollection, the first tip-out trailers began appearing at the Venture Out east Mesa park in 1973 . Pull out trailers came at least five years later. I do remember in 1979 having to deal with questions about a dealer bringing in a pull out trailer to the Venture Out east Mesa park. 7. By the time I left Venture Out and joined Roadhaven in 1980, I would estimate that approximately 85% of all of the trailers in the Venture Out east Mesa park were either tip-outs or pull-outs. By that time, in other words, pull-outs or tip-outs were not the wave of the future, they were the wave of the present in the more affluent side of the RV and trailer business. Tip-outs and slide- outs are particularly attractive to the residents of an owners AM. park such as Venture Out or Roadhaven, because the RV can be left in the park during the off season. 8 . At Venture Out, tip-outs and pull-outs were not regarded as encroaching on any set backs, but considered air space. All RV' s and travel trailers have a maximum allowable frame width of eight feet, and the box portion is considered to be official vehicle width. This can be seen in the certificates of title for any tip-out or pull-out RV. Some samples of title certificates supplied by tip-out or pull-out owners at the Roadhaven park are attached as Exhibit "1" . 9 . To the best of my recollection, the Roadhaven Apache Junction park was to be the second condominium/subdivision-type RV park in Arizona. The concept of this park was to provide superior amenities, and to attract the upscale side of the trailer park-RV park potential residents. Based upon my experience at Venture Out, it was my expectation from the beginning that a heavy majority of the trailers which would inhabit the park would be either tip-outs or pull-outs. We planned the park fully expecting this. 10 . Roadhaven initially acquired 45 acres in Apache Junction which had been zoned for 840 spaces. This would have meant that there would be 18 . 7 spaces per acre. 11 . Roadhaven acquired the adjoining five acres, and re- duced the density for the total 50 acre parcel to 660 spaces for Phase I of the project. 12 . When we bought the park, part of it was already occupied as a rental park. We kept 155 of the spaces in the size and configuration in which they had been set up originally. The dimensions of the interior lots of these 155 spaces are 35 feet by 48 feet, for a total square footage of 1, 680 square feet. Since these lots are rectangular, and their widths are 35 feet, no question has been raised about their propriety. An eight foot trailer with a four foot pull-out can sit on these lots (and some do) with a three foot set back on the side and twenty feet between pull-out trailers located on adjoining interior lots. On these lots, the cars must be parked beside the trailers. 13 . The lots which are the subject of controversy are interior lots which were part of our planned area development. The dimensions of these lots are 34 . 64 by 63. 51 feet, 2 ,199 . 99 square feet. These lots are approximately 520 square feet larger than those interior lots in the original configuration which we kept. They are in the shape of a parallelogram drawn on a -2- r. it 60° angle, and are deep enough so that the owners 'car can be parked in front of his recreational vehicle. In fact, our park regulations do not permit the owners of these lots to park their cars beside their trailers. As a result, there is considerably greater amount of open space between the trailers in these lots than there are between the trailers in the interior lots of the original 155 . 14 . Our records indicate that we were in contact with .... Mr. Joe Gero of the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Department beginning in late 1980 . 15 . At that time, Article 20 of the Apache Junction Zoning Code imposed very few restrictions on the development of a trailer or RV park. For example, although it imposed 20 foot separation requirements in the mobile home park, there were no such requirements in a trailer park. Similarly, there were no side set back requirements for adjoining interior lots in a trailer park. In effect, this authorized zero lot lines for trailer parks. 16 . Since this was to be the first condominium-type RV park in Apache Junction, I discussed with Mr. Gero whether Roadhaven should draft and submit a proposed ordinance, similar to what I had understood was done by Venture Out in Mesa. Mr. Gero told me that this would not be necessary, because there was sufficient latitude under the PAD provisions of the Apache Junction Zoning Code. From that point on, we proceeded under the assumption that this would be treated as a planned area development, and that we therefore would not have to be concerned about any changes in the zoning law. For this reason during the rezoning and plat approval process, I did not concern myself with or become aware of the changes in the TH Zoning Ordinance which occurred during 1 August of 1981. We were very far along in the planning, engineering and architectural matters prior to those changes. If I had been .•. aware of this at the time, it would have been my assumption that the planning personnel were taking such matters into consideration during our protracted dialogue and that any such matters would be taken into account in the PAD approval . 17 The project went through PAD planning, and because this was a new type of development for Apache Junction, we had numerous meetings with members of the City Planning staff, parti- cularly Mr. Gero. During those meetings, tip-outs and pull-outs and the effects on spacing were discussed, on more than one occasion. 18 . Also, I gave the city planners Venture Out as an example of what we intended to do in our lot sizing and spacing. I recommended that they look at Venture Out in order to see what we had in mind in our plan. Attached is Exhibit "2" a copy of a diagram showing how interior lots are done at Venture Out. -3- 19. I also discussed our CC&R' s with Mr. Gero, and even supplied him an advance copy of our CC&R' s and implementing regulations. He commented upon and requested changes in some of the CC&R' s. Attached as Exhibit "3" is an excerpt from our regu- lations which specifically mentions that a unit shall not exceed a basic width of eight feet and that the tip-out or slide-out portion shall not extend beyond that width no more than four feet. The revised CC&R' s were executed by me on February 16, 1982. 20. When the final plat was approved for Phase I, I distinctly recall Mr. Rich Broman, Director of Public Works, when asked by the chairman if the plans were in order, replied that not only were they in order but that they were some of the best that he had ever seen. Roadhaven has received numerous favorable comments about its park and planning. 21. The first four vehicles to be situated by lot pur- chasers in the Roadhaven resort at Apache Junction were pull-out trailers. Of the trailers presently in the park, my estimation is that a significant majority are of the pull-out or tip-out variety. In the roughly twenty months between the first sales and the beginning of this controversy numerous members of various staffs of the City have been in the Roadhaven park for a variety of reasons and have occasion and opportunity to see how the trailers sit on Roadhaven lots. This includes members of the planning staff who approved both phases of the project. As a walk through the project would demonstrate, the positioning of the trailers with respect to lot lines is clearly evident, and, I believe, in no respect unattrac- tive. The layout itself, we believe, compares very favorably to other possible layouts, particularly those where vehicels are parked beside trailers. 22. Although Roadhaven has not been directly involved, we do note that numerous approved awning plans show the tip-outs .-. extending beyond the ten foot asphalt driveway. Some examples of these are to be seen in Exhibit "4" . 23. It was always our understanding that the pull-outs in the configuration formed on our interior lots were acceptable and part of the approved PAD for Phase I. Based on this, we submitted the same interior lot plan as an extensive part of our Phase II plan. 24. About nine weeks ago, George Gerard brought it to my attention that no more awning permits were being issued to travel trailers with pull-outs as a result of a contention that Roadhaven trailer spacing was in violation of a code. I then went to meet with Mr. Frazier, the Building Inspector, to discuss -4- what might be done to resolve this contention. After checking with the fire chief, and learning that sixteen foot perpendicular measure- ment would be acceptable to him, Mr. Frazier suggested that I make the request contained in my letter dated January 17, 1984. 25. I then appeared at the DDC meeting which was to con- sider my January 17 proposal and it was passed with only two dissen- ters. Unfortunately, we at the Roadhaven head office did not receive a written notice that the matter would be on the council ' s agenda and .�. for that reason a qualified Roadhaven representative was not present to present its position on my January 17 request at the previous council meeting. To the best of my knowledge, I have attended personally all previous mettings of the Apache Junction City Council dealing in any way with Roadhaven in order to supply informa- tion not only to members of the Council in support of Roadhaven' s January 17, 1984 request, but also to members of the Planning Department. 26. I appreciate the concerns of the City Planning staff and the request by the City Council for more information on this subject. I recognize in retrospect that my January 17 letter was both ambiguous and incomplete. For example, it does not point out the reasons why a PAD was used; the fact that the Roadhaven interior lots contained 600 square feet more than the lot which would accomplish the same thing under TH zoning; and that by putting the cars in front of the trailers, the Roadhaven plan actually provides considerably more space between trailers than would be available under even the strictest interpretation of TH zoning. These and the other matters I have stated in this Affidavit I see, in retrospect, I should have supplied to the City and the planners in the first instance. I apologize for my delay in getting this information to the council , planners and other staff. Harry Bidwell STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss. County of Maricopa ) I do hereby personally acknowledge that Harr Bidwell , personally appeared before me this /f"4 day of 74 1984. .. /taA,14.(;144) et . Atuu Notary Public My Commission Expires: My Commission Exp cs A..g 12, 1924 -5- , , ,4r>2 \44-il r 14I<-**-7 .4,e/- S%. .-----,-7---!,,v_A . yQ AllUZONA DRPARTMRNT OF TRANSPORTATION I Motor Vsblcle Division �I Q'erti tratte of `dlttie ; , asitia . is a muti�ia ""v"""• Application for a certificate of-title to the Y♦� �c '-" TITLE K vehicle dewribed hereon has been filed with the , .,t •6 W ` I 4916 Motor Vehicle Division, Arizona Department i!s :• _ _ JILS INTL. iN>IR lamir erne .1179 of Transportation,by the person named hereon G a to a► .. fin -a-�---r as owner. // { hstetw �x a►r' Q "• +: The Motor Vetucic Division,certifies that the atiaaaa. -_� i ` (71 applicant has been duly registered in this office ma`s t -- as owner of the vehicle described, pursuant to bil iww.ro.awsci--^1 �r---1 ;, i the laws of the State of Arizona,subject to the mu.istMil '- .'- -` rare aawia MUpant told traeuwbraaotx,if say,hereto let forth. or LEEtllll • 1 WA ,. In witness whereof, I have affixed my rs aims" �?— J r FttiQ771) signature and seal of the Division at Phoenix. /\ 2600 NEW YORK LW. lib If i. si.K �� CM ,,,,, �-� 9, .. -_ -_ AI.NgtIERQUE N.M. ,fit ti710/ aw 1/1e119 ?1 I��a 111312min I mum minas a a'news r mil 1i�1. 1•k r M Rt� Assistant Director for Motor Vehicle Division \ ,:c I /' C•le NI IN SON r °�, - n»ogarraaat M art be'Eu t L aw Mir err raarriam Mrawalr • mT _ I MAR 22 1983 I r alarm sib.auraereaM ealatrbt)asermarerttbwtvwnia.aM r r �/ • �.. .-•_- w rwa+w IN/Or O�rbwtL • " s : t ri=if. R1/83 ''it , 1 p)i•, •4. -•1 N)iikewl IZI ry 1,i'KS:'"" N O. „Ai' 1-3r0.illosit, 'Jr .4, 70' - i- A - -- --- N , i(..j; \ ( iotii-r• -).,77-\---;. ' ._ —.. -`--- - .....--."-.._,_.— t I � � AItIi.ONA DEPARTMENT OF TILANSPOI{TATIUN rkill Muter Vehicle DivL 4wi _ rate of ilia ,.. ,,) ii , , .. 5 1 ril wwm„.w..w,�w. .1 , . TiT1,K ......— Q e � unaseeniewtte ,liwai llb 90 - _ Motor Vehicle Diviin A 1iT. mf --++��-- »� _ Arizona Dcpurtmcn �/ i nof'1'ranaportation,by llte pertun named iiereunJ.twa• .t sit i s Corry! wa} _wtawl2 F.` sic owner, `� T tp , ai'F' �'rorwrretnarruwain'•' � � 'il►e Molar Vehicle Division,certifies that tlic 94 z'�� .aaaw i3i ' t 1' ate, upidicaut has been duly registered in this office s I', tiawaaaa M �� i°t a• _ as owner of th a vehicle datenbed, pursuant to ;a •- ,� Mai■iaiii M. -- ilia laws of the State of Arizona,►ubject to tlu. j winniwiaiir iiji"' erwn iii— liens and cncuu►braiw ,ilatty.herein set forth �{{orGGordo�'awrral� s od•twIn wiUtats wl►ereof, 1 hart affixed myf art wars ^- - —• a.�°Y sa ►71 °,� tixiiatura and scut u(tiic Division at i'hocnix. t3Sl Pale Yordr.�' Mil ■". 1iNttiRo(tOn a; 1S=tO MKP •=ti, ..10.11.,,, "t„ec�•:.t ' <r •11ie. a b'rt Nt1 NMI M INtOR 1•k k BINS el any tttlitts Assistant Director for Motor Vehicle Division/' 1•k Mt1 iN IttIM1 MIMIfI. ,i I ,� i �j: nor 011PrnroaS wi mat M PPIMMtttie We Mn err rwwyaat a>dasaNr i t C. 44 It7 lanaua p aescommempoTlrawwwtanwar A ,/ JUN 3 1983 \ /, � ' ';,;1,..ts- ,•1 ,,,0 ,; . se • Pli2S';"dliell ..41, 70, ,„ ,,i, -,--1);,:iocia 4.;,i .7.1) 71,..-0, .,<7...A.7)\- I &117 "iirr• :3'.71.-..41.1tkiliNi( - /All:15-:•ZiAll:"' "\4114-7Zi%..e. `..,6:1> . tk,r---1 ----i ,;'G ARIZONA DEPARTMENT Oh TRANSPORTATION (i f Motor Vshkle Division - 04r-if/irate of Citit }, MMI`i— �� '.•.~" t. • Application for a certificate of title to the ••' _ is 4 r NW I•PA'1141' • T1Tl.li vehicb describedhereon has heat filctl with the r'�G1:1:i2 U1(L _�— a1ooO36 Motor Vehicle Division, Arironu I)cpurtmcnt — N►� Mn i�nti of Transportation,by the person named hcrconC��I wsuiw�irNM1T wir�i irwc {) M �IC' i oars as owner. 15�03 0 ss 35 U MOjy The Motor Vehicle Division,certifies that the P1 I nisi wi s ` applicant has been duly registered in this office '�""�� _ •' _ WI as owner of the vehicle described, pursuant to "?'___..tl... ._..._._ ._ _._: . the laws of the State of Arizona,subject to the �ODMs` - -• •• --- --••-•• _. liens and encumbrances,if any,herein set forth. salt iisiww� YdOl1 YM iia curt�- �iwran un7._ ..._ _ PATHIGL VIItOII• Illi g A3031}inkoit In witness whereof, I i►ave affixed my (- Oral, _ LI,V�I(b _.. • , or i .. ___. .•. signature and seal of the DIYItum at Phoenix , ` 1000 0. IDAAO SOAD t P.,'1509 __ sun $11 (� cni ppq '3I0'" .i AV AQl$_rl.VtlfM0If..__ _..R._05229_. _ MN,R- Q) _ - � i466441 IBMIUMINUMUSUIEM . 91 • A A.relleete the Mal talluft, ••le M outs el 911.l99 albs Director for Motor Vehicle Division C•Is eel IN Mel uiiesie. coAssistant �� lh•Wp«twwnl .w aW be rnpoa•aA• o«tote,«h•vdul•nl ro•�a•I•r MAY 3 1903ILaoawMLmore•NI ea••gaawalatuwC«aaeuaalTai•«I«errorsawhtoMira eha» HIP INAf1EErtAU R1/03 E Iliit r APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION M VIWTURE OUT I AS OWNER DO HEREBY REQUEST APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPING AND/OR MODIFICATION ON MY LOT LOCATED AT BELOW INDICATED ADDRESS AND I WILL PERFORM ONLY THE WORK OUTLINED HEREIN THAT IS APPROVED OWNERS NAME (PLEASE PRINT, I ADDRESS IN VENTURE OUT DATE OF APVUCATION j DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE NOTE I AS LOT OWNER DO HEREBY AGREE THE PLACEMENT AND ATTACHMENT OF ANY ITEM AND WORK TO BE PERFORMED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS ASSET FORTH IN THE BY-LAWS OF VENTURE OUT AT MESA, INC DRAWING OF LOT SHOWING LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION SHOW TIP-OUT AREA 2SS NGN o).7.,,,00riv .�oP�c�o Qo W cr W Q05\�\Ot, AQ cc i �P M• • \UJ o CO +\�t P ' g25 \\ N V W y QQQ O •. \ G 47...kP Z cr p .•. i o WF GI Pap SO S / n W ¢ ' Q p'�\O / / w la QC `5� / U En c / I / 0 I- APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE 4111 W c s AWNING 13 2 co 4)j POSITION W M / Of \•• O- m W SHOW 3' SET-BACK I • I (TURN FORM OVER FOR DIFFERENT VIEW) CONTRACTORS TO PERFORM WORK _____, APPROVED(Br ARCHITECTURAL COMM I DATE SIGNATURE OF LOT OWNER 4 ... NOT APPROVED(BY ARCHITECTURAL COMM i DATE APPROVAL AFTER CONSTRUCTION BY MOR •DATE REV 2/I/El _ 1 RULES AND REGULATIONS As approved by the Board of Directors of Roadhaven Resort of Apache Junction 1 All lots in the Subdivision known as Roadhaven Resort of Apache Junction shall be solely used as recreational campsites for travel trailers,the only type of travel trailer units(herein referred to as either travel trailers or units)which may be located and used upon any lot within the Subdivision are tent-type folding trailers,pickups/with campers,motor hdtnes,travel trailers,and other similar types of camping trailers and equipment that are mobile. Folding tents not mounted on wheels are prohibited. Permanent and semi-permanent structures may be erected on lots within the subdivision only in accordance with the provisions contained in the recorded Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions for the Subdivision.No unit which is designed as a permanent living quarters may be located or placed on any lot, it being the declared intent to exclude mobile homes and dwelling houses from use within the Subdivision. { 2. Set forth below are additional permitted uses and use limitations, as the case may be, with regard to lots within the ivision. � A One storage shed constructed of corrugated aluminum siding,white or pastel in color or a combination of white and pastel, shall be permitted on each lot The word "pastel" as used above shall mean off-white. The color and design of the storage shed must harmonize generally with other sheds placed in the Subdivision since its inception.Each storage shed shall not be more than eight feet (8') wide, ten feet (10') long and seven feet six inches (7'6') high, and not less than 6 feet (6') wide, eight feet (8') long and six feet six inches (6'6") high. B A semi-permanent awningattached to the unit is Per permitted provided it is not more than twelve feet(12')in width, - is not longer than the box portion of the unit and does not extend beyond either the front or rear of the unit at the point of attachment. Semi-permanent awnings shall be constructed such that both the awning and supporting structures are detachable C. A free-standing awning is permitted provided it does not extend more than twelve feet (12') from the unit, is located generally over the original patio area, is not more than twelve feet (12')in width, is not more than thirty-seven feet six inches (37 6"}ia.length, and not more than ten feet (10') in height The supporting parts must be detachable 4 A unit shall not exceed a basic width of eight feet(8'), and any tip-out or slide-out portion which is part thereof shall not extend beyond such width bymore than four feet(4') Neither the boxany Y portion of the unit nor tip-outs or slide-outs which are or may become part of the unit shall extend into any easement located upon the lot without the prior written approval of the Board of Directors or their nominees E. All units (including extendable enclosures attached thereto) shall be of such exterior material and design as that A customarily used by recognized manufacturers of such units. F. No unit shall have more than two extendable enclosures; i.e., tip-out or slide-out portions. The extendable enclosure shall be located on the side of the unit opposite the patio. No extendable enclosure shall exceed the length of the box portion of the unit. G Skirting of a unit is permitted, but such skirting shall be limited to conventional metallic skirting of a color and gn similar to that of the unit H Exterior additions or attachments to a unit,other than expressly permitted herein,on the top,rear, front,side or underneath, are prohibited. I. Washing machines other than those located either within the unit or within a storage shed of the type authorized in Paragraph 2 A above, are prohibited, provided, however, each owner shall provide adequate plumbing for any washing machine, the adequacy of which shall be subject to the approval of the Board of Directors or their nominees J. Ramada roofs, cabanas, permanently enclosed patios, add-on rooms,carports and fences on or around any lot are prohibited, however, trellises constructed around patio areas are permitted provided they are so constructed that they will not materially affect the adjacent lot owner's view The definition of a patio for the purpose of this rule shall mean the area covered by an awning or the area that would be covered by an awning as authorized in Sub-paragraph 2 B above. K. Any lot owner who rents or causes his lot to be rented to another shall forfeit his right to use the common areas within the Subdivision, including the recreation facilities, and owner's rights at special events during the period of time that his lot is rented to another Such rights shall be deemed transferred to the tenant during the rental term.Such tights are not forfeited as to other lots owned by the owner but not rented 32 ( Y - ZONING CLEARANCE/BUIL((CATIONAG PERMIT VIUSINESS LICENSE L BUILDING UMBER CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PERMIT NUMBER 3 5 6 2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT . 1001 N IDAHO ROAD - A J , AZ 85220 APPLICANT: COMPLETE NUMBERED SPACES -- PRL:S:J (HAND TO MAKE 4 COPIES �SINSTRUCTION ADDRESS / ZONE 011SfT .�j PARCEL NO L/�/ CENSUS TR p (� , (/goo .. a441 o Bak 77 /Pp / c -ifq, r n(�jC \�,ILIJ ;(GAL r/$PACE K. SUB IV./L'IO-B�H}OME PARK ,(� ZONING CA E M B A CASE I ZONING PERM( S PRIOR 1 sir..r am" I J 1`�d?7o� L ✓FK t�Te or4 -- sr R�1 ECT16AS TO J 1 t F.Y0, R.Y . S YD I IS.YID FRONTAGE BLOG HT LOT COVER% 1� •F- -o wR L. 4/1v AS K.p�A 1 REMARKS. ! '� f W� Aid I. �i L AON iRECOp ) i r >tf*Z. 0 l rlt. .WR PHONE , 'L1 i.e.(' `.��j(of DATE (' ^✓' ^� 'NO ADDRESS ZIP ZONING it- OO S S�Q APPVD BY- � UINt11. m CTOR /y�, LIC PHONE FLOOD NTROL HIGHWAY R W L �1 DEPT n rO�Q ! 1KJ N(r1q y9G`4 1`9`�,/� new). RECTO- OCCUPANCY ' ,n j "'7I �`♦ v ZIP ! 4 CONSTR PE OCCUPANCY TOTAL AREA AAa LSTORIESr O 2 - ssae3 4/U �vt l 2 I SWAM WORK a` I Y� AWL AREA fAR AREA STOR AREA U BR 0 BATH BLDG HT O J/ . . �1 aw.11•1 (7CSO # �311C P) (�,J�/, a) AuATION `. S IDE SPRNKLR REOD HNOCP FA IL REOD m 966e— / 33a SPEC INSP REDD b 0 NEW 0 ALT CIAD'N 0 MOVE 0 MNElPOOL 0 CONC 0 STEEL 0 OTHR m TYPE 0 (WORK El 0 PLB CI RESD 0 COCOWL. ❑FARM/A0 EREMARKS' Q v BL GAS CO ELEC CO CONSTRMECH 'WATER CO OR SOURCE LIST SOURCE POWER o OF SEWER(SEPTIC-ISSD) APD BY DATE r- UTILITIES t0 I hereby co:i Illy that I am the owner or duly authorized owner's agent, that I have lead this application 100 FIAT FEE SINGLE PERMIT N that all information is correct I further certify that I have read understand and will comply with (SF.) S v I the provisions outlined hereon I also certify that the plot plan submitted is a complete and accurate I_VALUE TABLE SINGLE PERMIT / co plan showing any and all existing and proposed structures on the subject roperty (VAL1 s ,! -<U .I�. i 200 ITEMIZED T DATE 3 2 YA _SIGNATURE 41210 PLAN CHECK-GEN'L A 211 PLAN CHECK STDS 37 m 220 PLAN CHECK FLAT 0 0 PROVISIONS. The issuance of this permit shall not be construed to release the owner or owner's 230 BUILDING _D 17 (gents from the obligation to comply with the provisions of all laws and ordinances including 231 ADDITION z bderal state and local jurisdictions,which regulate construction and performance of construction 240 PLUMBING.. 0 This permit becomes null and void if the construction work authorized is not begun within 180 250 ELECTRICAL - c lays from date of issue or if at any time prior to final inspection and approval the work is suspended �0 MECHANICAL C 7 x abandoned for a period of 180 days o) ro 270 ZONING 1 ,l 41S IMPORTANT THAT YOU CALL FOR INSPECTION AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS 2_OTHER(SPECIFY) NOTICE All subcontractors on this project must have Arizona license Building Safety Div is 300 SPECIAL FEES Jr', 0 be notified 310 DOUBLE FEE 320 REVISED P•Z- :onlractor Law 321168 A R S requires each applicant sign a statement that the applicant is 3_COPY __ Jrrentty licensed If the applicant is exempt, the statement shall contain the basis of the asserted i 400 ADJUSTMENT . _ I / • ' demotion r �. • APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ,N I AS OWNER DO HEREBY REOUEST APPROvAL Or THL rot t OWING CONt•1RUCTION LA•:rl',CAPING AND'OA MODIFICATION ON MY LOT LOCATED AT BELOW INDICATED ADDRESS AND I WILL PERVCmM ONt Y THE WOIW, OLITLINrn H(PEIN THAT IS APPROVED Ow.l(n ..•,.[ .r,!•S(nn,Ni. .(n[• • O(SCn,r,m..0,v.(Y•/0$(fsOwf /2 x 3 7 acs-► ( 1 S k,r li K /6 k(0 .S&o re rpo :: . _ NOTE: I AS LOT OWN 3, DO IIF.REBY ,h-CI: THE PLACI.`iENT AND ATTACIIMFN1 OF ANY ITEM AND WORK TO BE PERFORMED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIIF DECLARATION OF COVFNANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS A:. SIT FORTH IN TIM BY-LAWS FOR ROADUAVLN RESORTS OF APACHE JU:7CT'ION.. ,.I. DRAWING OF LOT SHOWING LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION _ I • SHOW TIP-OUT AREA �/ ''' J ) `\ }l �t1 ; r W 1 rj j w 1 t I CC W CC 4 , , .7J ( \ /. -__5, y —1 , , _. , oo /( 1d • (n N Illgia140100011111 �v W Ci0 U. w WDIIf t �t.A-6 j��'tZ Q 4w `� o I- W r 1 1 6 Nip ,)& i )cip ,„40/0 t _ \ ....0 I/1 CC 111111 .--- ---''''.1_ '' : \t/ ‹ 0 W L ' i /1" D 0 I 51-4•4 \ iik, ot/ tD W ISI•IOW 3 SET RACK I 356 2 . Si-)-r/8 ,i,L,c71- • (TI IRN I ORI�,OVER FOr1 DirFEREIJT VIEW) COv+F._•r,"•, rr nr OnU wO°. —' (JJ-- .—__ _._ /{'(,•�(T AU)li(v{ .2 Y63_ "_ /_�.r r L-( Aft- / �/ `. /CJ �/ C l I i,•11 '„ N.•1 i11 . (!,1(,W y'-2;',Y,3 ___-_____ )____ 1M� 1l,Y` •n.•e1V.( Tln,nN•rn11( W.,.nr uc,1 � p•T[ I I n(v 7 1 111 ',TY o PACHE APPLICATION — ZONING CLEARANCE/BUILDING PERMIT BUILDING 4 UNCTION BUSINESS I CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ( PERMITNUMBER _ 7 5 V 'AA: NUMBER: BUILDING DEPARTMENT /`) ‘, 1001 N. IDAHO ROAD — A J., AZ 85220 PERMIT APPLICANT* COMPLETE NUMBERED SPACES PRESS (HARD TO MAKE 5 COPIES EXPIRES: ld /j 2STRUCTION ADDRESS 2 ZONE GIST P/T� PArRR�CELL NO. 9 CENSUS TR. T ' 4L / 1 P6 K U / A K 1 dwe ZO I----•�M E3-A CASEM /0G+ Zc�ZONING PERMITSPRIOR itEVI��i LIISL•J_ems 1 �f1ECTIONST J elQ ?V kesor+� " .� I 1`\ d y/r� d /� F Yb R YD. S YE) 1 .Y/D//2 FRONTAGE-BLDG HT LOT COVER% 0 �! 9 `^'�r{�r�� , l S IP I Ne 7f,,,,(� i- -1- b tle /l Oif C /2' 54 3 f/•i No .� .. IJIA t I REMARKS - - -F L PHONE BLOC r t.:1 j •'1,1,61n CuA/NtAt4 m LINO AO RESS �.i. ZONING -1 / I '_ Q�I��yl d ZIP APPVD BY DATE - 'r i.L MiTO le 4. >1t. 315 RI ow.g. 41•,�r $SD�.D 1 ///f4 L• ,i /' LIC " 2 Q PHONE // {� /_ -FL N ROW LTHH 0 PT /] Z ce1?� i s . /�wN L et T 5537/ C Z' J QO to REO'D /I//� /AML 00 3O1 II /J �^ A ( 'P � CO T/R TYPE CUPANCY t/ TOTAL ARE P NO STORIES [ f wbplC.�i/T�H�r�i /T'.] r /Y.�e iS,S--:a D.f [a��i/V� �y/f rU / _m tM �7 DWL AREA GAR/CP AREA STOR REAr I B ! M BATH OLD& NT Z 1�sfQd' ' ��Jt/�(� i'/I• fl IJJN Ci� 'X 3a►' ..._. m VINO STRUCTURES ` E VALUE SPRNKLR REOD HNDCP FACIL REDO 13R KfT�111,ri d e I - 1)69.- kee v - C IC �3 0 -3116 P ) %A/ o ;WE L-41-NE ' ❑ALT L ,V* ❑MOVE H ❑POOL ❑CONC ❑STEEL ❑OTHR v 6ORK ❑ELEC ❑PCB ❑MECH ❑RESO ❑COL 0 FARM/AG REMARKS D M' r GAS CO ELEC.CO WATER CO OR SOURCE II- LIST CONSTR SOURCE POWER CO OF ❑ SANITARY FACILITIES TO BE IN ACCORDANCE BIM/PR CO UTILITIES WITH PINAL COUNTY REGULATIONS APPVD BY44 DATE "J ..a hereby certify that I alit the owner or duly authorized owner's agent, that I have read this application 100 FLAT FEE SINGLE PERMIT 0 and that all information is correct I further certify that I have read, understand and will comply with (SF) s r) .1, III of( movisions outlined hereon I also certify that the plot plan submitted is a complete and accurate i_v E SINGLE PERMIT fan s. wing any and all existing and proposed structures on the sub/je /!property (VA $ v D _ ..„ y, . n i�' / 200 ITEMIZED m D m o )ATE /— C�., ! SIGNATURE .1 _... ._. ! a.. .1/0 ? 210 PLAN CHECK-GEN'L n DJ 211 PLAN CHECK STDS 220 PLAN CHECK FLAT Z 0 ROVISIONS- The issuance of this permit shall not be construed to release the owner or owner's 230 BUILDING Z Dents fiom the obligation to comply with the provisions of all laws and ordinances, Including 231 ADDITION C ederal, state and local jurisdictions, which regulate construction and performance of construction 240 PLUMBING CD CD 'his permit becomes null and void if the construction work authorized is not begun within 180 250 ELECTRICAL a :ays from date of issue or if at any time prior to final inspection and approval the work is suspended Y abandoned for a period of 180 days 260 MECHANICAL 0 _a no ZONING T IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU CALL FOR INSPECTION AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS p_OTHER ISPECIFV) GI 74 tOTICE: All subcontrU ctors on this a protect must have Arizona license Building Safety Div is 300 SPECIAL FEES DATE & D be notified 310 DOUBLE FEE RM TYPE AMT INITIALS • 320 REVISED P i Z 11/. ' _1'4A �/ Oo /♦ ; . ✓:antractor Law 32 1168 A R S requires each applicant sign a statement that the applicant is zrently licensed If the applicant is exempt, the statement shall contain the basis of the asserted 3_coPr - — lemption 400 ADJUSTMENT_7 f Aft. 1 I APPLICATION AND PERM!r FOR CONSTRUCTION I.AS OWNER DO HI: REQUEST APPROVAL or THr FOi t OWIN(,CONST fUCTION L,Nr)`..CAI'ING AND/OR MODIFICATION ON MY LOT LOCATCO AT BELOW INDICATED nDCInrSS AND I WILL Pm nnM UI1i Y fill wonv ottII,inrr)i•(rri[IN Ti(AT t', APPIkOvED — hwq('...yu.l „I r.•, vu,Nl . I••I.1..1•.. ..I _, _?‘k/A!..Sitid 7e,ILCal/ !t' &0ak wail y, K ,, ')L/o1 NOTE: I AS LOT OWNER, DO HEREBY AGREE THE PLACEMENT ANT) ATThCIIMF•.NT• ANY ITEM AND WORK TO BE PERFORMED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH Till' DECLARATION pl' COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS AS SIT i'ORTII IN THE RY-LAWS FOR ROADIIAVEN RESORTS OF APACHE JUNCTION.. DRAWING OF LOT SHOWING LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION —.-7 "" ' r ' /"' ' '4. ..-- SHOW TIP-OUT AREA / �,F.\, I �lei 1, P 5. N"' fr ,..,; .1C• I-. 41 ,,,,..„....,,,, Cf I .'''' 7" • •.:.73,0":?; )-• >,,./..----- iii u. O 4•1P .�V''' V/. ___.rrs,` v r"' .( 1 i ✓ S ei Ifai›,i 0 IL tU W AC' • A pflev W y l I WZQ ••+ a� WZ pr'fl ,-:') di'', lulz .0::::• idIA ../ 41 < \ �I a0 Cr � • 11`�J � v) .- 17:-TI:-;-•, 1 CC Z •A „"J_ ;`-"�i — 0l V �QT W Si--) IOW 3' `;FT HACK r P APPROVED DATE Oifg4 , .S/-,Z)ZYZte Deputy Zoning Administrator ___O_u __� w City of Apache Junction tT1inN 1 ORM OVER FOR DIFFrntNT VICV/I o wTrl•ctOIt 0rEnr u oa. `I •q.110vtP le:.nc...I rC 1lM6,1 (.64Y, -- 11.61 j/)/ ._. ... ... ..1 l.r.n. ��i /Ms zr : �=i+r✓HE APPLICATION - ZONING CLEARANCE/BUII '�MNG PERMIT NCTION BUSINESS BUILDING ►� CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PERMIT 4 0 8 4 I,)CENSE NUMBER: NUMBER BUILDING DEPARTMENT r If p1001 N. IDAHO ROAD — A J AZ 85220 PERMIT! APPLICANT: COMPLETE NUMBLFIE:1) 5i'� CES — PI LbS I,MRD TO �. 5 COPIES EXPIRES: / ' /(7'`X TASTRUCTION ADDRESS ZONE DIST PA CEL NO. NSUS TR ff 3Ea. •A SUB Div/MOBBYHOME PARK ZONIN(aCAS ,/ BA CASE,/ ZONING PER -•RI•R I �S.l to• 'n •`sr NT OCT(OR DIQEC N OB) F JYO R V S YO, S• . YD 2 FRONTAGE BLDG HT LOT COVER% Q t D S PTION(REC _ ___ REMARKS � �` -- L ' ,•i '. f ! it PHONE S I / n i, k_ .3. AIL 1'l. YJLING ADDRESS •/� ZIP 2 NM DA - k""'"-"��"• - 'JIlTR D t✓ S__^jel( / t4 , APPVD BY 0 TOR iY`l'w��L LIC. PH N/yT±u rL NE R O H OEPT 'Z t 414171.7 Z1V! ( .W/ S REO'O` :/ l 0 1� � w� �� Q(1�„T Y�P�E OCCUPANCY� /� TOTAL NO STORIES m [[ram' 117J tt e�I w l G///' // „... IBE w0 OWL AREA GAR/CP AREA S'10 REA ,/BR ,/BATH IBLOG HT Z _ate _ O -�r 'eA0 a/!G /°,�.2 -.�e co ING STRUCTURES al- VALUE SPRNKLR PLOD HNDCP FACIL REGO m . I01-�4 ,e /' , O 3 6 e Sr1 INSP RED U NEW ❑ALT 0 AD'N 0 MOVE ❑M F' 0 CONC CI STEEL 0 OTHR �+ hPE t,/ORK ELEC ❑KB. ❑MECH ❑RESO G REMARKS C) D r • GAS CO ELEC.co f" LIST CON 1 SOURCE POW _ G00 Of a BLAPOC PRY DATE IU UTILITIES V -1 "119itYt a hereby certify that I am the owner or duly . id this application 100 FLAT FEE SINGLE PERMIT 0 ynd that all information is correct I further c —arid will comply with (SF) $ _ 17 n i 'II of the provisions outlined hereon I also cerli -.tea complete and accurate 1V UE TABLE-SINGLE PERMIT )Ian showing any and all existing and propose ubject property ( f a53 $ A-CO u 7 I ^ �, / a 200 ITEM IZEDno IITEa C�/SIGNATURE W A' 2(0 PLAN CHECK-GEN'L p i 211 PLAN CHECK SIDS 0 ci 220 PLAN CHECK-FLAT Z 0 IAOVISIONS• The issuance of this permit shall not be construed to release the owner or owner's 730 BUILDING z gents from the obligation to comply with the provisions of all laws and ordinances, including 231 ADDITION_ C $deral state and local jurisdictions, which regulate construction and performance of construction 240 PLUMB,NG w his permit becornes null and void if the construction work authorized is not begun within 180 250 ELECTRICAL m 33 Lys from date of issue or if at any time prior to final inspection and approval the work is suspended 260 MECHANICAL L.y I abandoned for a period of 180 days CLiI 270 ZONING. ?15 IMPORTANT THAT YOU CALL FOR INSPECTION AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS 2_OTHER(SPECIFY) Z 10TICE. All subcontractors on this project must have Arizona license Building Safety Div is 300 SPECIAL FEES > R/N TYPE AMT DATE & , INITIALS :be notified 310 DOUBLE FEE 7 +f1r anlractor Law 32 1168 A R S requires each applicant sign a statement that the applicant is 320 REVISED P a z_ I 7tio !f-' /44J /f° D js rrently licensed If the applicant is exempt, the statement shall contain the basis of the asserted 3—tour emption 400 ADJUSTMENj 77 I • APPLICATION ANO PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION I.AS OWNER DO HEREBY REQUEST APPpovAL or THE COI LOWING CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPING',AND/OR MODIFICATION ON MY LOT LOCATED AT BELOW INDICATED ADDRESS AND 1 Will REntGMM ow Y Till WUnt< OUII INF'0HIN{Itl IIIAI IS APPROVED QW.t11. N.41 rl,l 1.�I 1'u.Nl• i.111.1.1.. r •(•II r.! •r•r.l if.rnr.�- U[SCa.rT1Cw U. wW•'0 Ft COI — _ j...f ._. _ &-- --, - �ry-i. AI �r.7 e ,ILti�15 /v .4-(c•-�r�,�..¢ p4•• l J �-�'. _ _ OTE: I AS LOT OWNER, DO (HEREBY AGREE THE PLACEMENT ANT) ATTACIIMENT OF ANY ITEM AND WORK TO BE PERFORMED SHALL BE INI ACCORDANCE Wi ll Till•. DECLARATION orCOVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND TUE RULES AND REGULATIONS AS SLT FOR11I IN THE BY-LAWS FOR ROADIIAVEN RESORTS OF APACHE JUNCTION. _ _ _ ____ DRAWING OF LOT SHOWING1LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION SHOW TIP-OUT AREA ..,'''''''vr.:t...-^ .".:1,,,,....".".0.1 r ;. E„ S a w w W 0 <0 - \ 1;) \CC W :' , > / .L) 14°X 2-' 7)*c•-iti--- , , 0 (II rc 'r5fr . ,-(e/ w ° `l. ' �p1e. V 1101. ZIr C :- o o- W 2 i- ...,. ..‘,:'. ' 0 --\ - tu Q .0/0„, u J s to W /M ; 0000°' ;Z u, , 4 0* t( ,...,1(71� �p tr., IY`i1 SHOW 3' ET-BACK I PLAN APPROVED DATE 9:4: . . Deputy °fling Administrator -T r I City of Apache Junction (TURN FORM OVER FOR DIFFERENT VIEW) CONU.CTOoS i0•fftrowu woa ---- - — ._ _. .r..-O...c...•.c-...C.II•V CO.w.i - -- - - -T'-' - - - -'----•----:- _--_ .--- —-- -- -- STY OF APACHE APPLICATION - ZONING CLEARANCE/BUILC(NG PERMIT ( 1 BUILDING ( NOTION BUSINESS CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PERMIT 4 5 8 4 ENSE NUMBER: NUMBER BUILDING DEPARTMENT -r- 1001 N. IDAHO ROAD — A J , AZ 85220 PERMIT APPLICANT: COMPLETE NUMBERED SPACES — PHLSS HARD TO MAKE 5 COPIES EXPIRES: lQll 2/54 ?'ISTRUCT ION ADDRESS ZONE DIST PARCEL NO CENSUS TR S / d , TsaH 0 0 lei �'� / •IL /02-35-.37 r.I'�rc'I;ill,,i."1 AC� SUB Di 08 HO E PARK ZONING CASE B A.CASE ZONING PERMITS RIOR a ud NC* eSE�NTERS CT OR DI1BLic ECTIONSTCJOB) A F YDf R YD. SD, 1 S YD 2 FR T BLOC.HT LOT COVER% 0 y M (J SIP K)0 4'• IDEDI ��G' 6%U , 4 I Q in N/eq ��REMARKS 33JWH ? t84 ' i Z A Y f �R PHONE � %., e rr l .�D 07 a r BLDG. DEPT. __ J (SING ADDRESS ZIP ZONING DATE 7 O / APPVD BY / O t �l / O �a.f,� Y7 v( Z ..mACTOR LAC. %1OQ FLOOD O W ODEP/ / 6 L REO'D e.r h 671... ..;h r �yei6 061, , fin! CRESS ZIP C�NST YPE /jOCCUPASCY TOT L AREA') NO. ORIES .c vO s /ft u,` Ps2O 3 AIikm Aum)i`�i ! , ! cll _U gEgriiriW K /' OWL AREA GAR/CP AREA 'STOR AREA •BA I BATH BLDG.HT Z 13 08 INO STRUCTURES E.WVALUEA/ SPRNKLR REOD HNOCP FACIL REOD �- f Qfr/ / -, SPEC INSP REDD o In,� 0 NEW ❑ALT 0 AD'N 0 MOVE ❑M.H. POOL 0 CONC 0 STEEL CI Z WORK 0 ELEC 0 PLB 0 MECN 0 RESD 0 COWL 0 FARM/AG REMARKS O r LIST OAS CO ELEC.CO CONSTR WATER CO OR SOURCE r SOURCE POWER Co OF ❑ SANITARY FACILITIES TO BE IN ACCORDANCE BLDG./PR00 UTILITIES WITH PINAL COUNTY REGULATIONS APPVD BY DATE N V 1 J Ihereby critlly that I rim the owner or duly authorized owner's agent, that I have read this application 100 FLAT FEE SINGLE PERMIT e tnd that all information is correct I further certify that I have read understand and will comply with (SF) $ ( A •1 the provisions outlined hereon I also certify that the plot plan submitted is a complete and accurate 1_VALUE TABLE SINGLE PERMIT = _.,a showing any and all existing and proposed structures on the subject property IvAL, 9 9? s / ,,—� 3) 200 ITEMIZED >J m SIGNATURE 1'.1.1,e� 210 PLAN CHECK-GENT. 0 IATE1"l-1� � �� o 211 PLAN CHECK STDS 0 r O_ 220 PLAN CHECK FLAT Z L7 N40VISIONS: The issuance of this permit shall not be construed to release the owner or owner's 230 BUILDING z gents from the obligation to comply with the provisions of all laws and ordinances, including 231 ADDITION c deral state and local jurisdictions, which regulate construction and performance of construction 240 PLUMBING W Ns permit becomes null and void if the construction work authorized is not begun within 180 250 ELECTRICAL M tys from date of issue or if at any time prior to final inspection and approval the work is suspended M0 MECHANICAL 0 tabandoned for a period of 180 days :a 270 ZONING ...- 1 IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU CALL FOR INSPECTION AT LEAST EVERY 180 DAYS 2_OTMER(SPECIFY) VICE. All subcontractors on this project must have Arizona license Building Safety Div is 300 SPECIAL FEES R/N TYPE AT DATE 8 D M I be notified 310 DOUBLE FEE _ �/J INITIALS 320 REVISED P&Z_ 77-Mr_ Az< /gist'//2/Ist5/ infractor Law 32 1168 A R.S. requires each applicant sign a statement that the applicant is i� /// gently licensed If the applicant is exempt, the statement shall contain the basis of the asserted 3—COPY IIinption 400 ADJUSTMENT /7, ./-7� • r APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION I AS OWNER DO HEREBY REQUEST APPROVAL Or THE FOL t OWINC,CONSTRUCT ION LAND',CAPING AND/OR MODIFICATION ON MY ei LOT LOCATED AT BELOW INDICATED ADDRESS AND I WILL PEW ORM ONLY THE WORK DUD INFO HEREIN:HAT 15 APPROVED_ - Owr.(a •,.r ,n11••f rnlpl 1•Ohrlra� r•rf fv •I.n1,r•1KPI J_____ ta5[iiwit JewE5 7D Jam owl ice!. . Ol5Cnlrl rlr.0' wOA• tO 11f 00M tf)Gx RE-r iL' U/A-v _ NOTE: I AS LOT OWNER, DO HEREBY AGREE THE PLACEMENT AND ATTACHMENT OF ANY ITEM AND WORK TO BE PERFORMED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND THE RULES AND REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE BY-LAWS FoR ROADIIAVEN RESORTS OF APACHE JUNCTION„ DRAWING OF LOT SHOWING LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION :.....>"...„../.1 1if1f\'' IPZ4 3 414 ,i Ct N'141*-1 td' N.._0 1 VV , ) PaiLiad / igieitil .- ,--- ' /a )e 3Co SHOW IP-OU - f T AREA ' (jug -'co U 1 1 � �' -1:„. W W (" cc ( 4` 110\;) ,‘ l /It / �� J 0 91) cc w nio\ 0 \ \I(144') _3‘ire. 7. -- eeet w y / \ Q-(v Wp o W W w ''" O • Z cgZ = • /1 ��% 11 • W F- , a 001010111F-0111111t* , • Li, ttOmilio r � � 4.,. . I \ l a z p' ... ., .. Z u,s VI ,..._iie- m W / IP. fi ,p SHOW 3' SET-RACK GVh 4L'' 1 i N APPROVED niT/9 i4. A t/A- L__ 5(6 1(4 )Crt I ia' Deputy Zonln��mmistrator 8 City of Apache Junction (TURN r0 OVEn ron DlrrrnEr4T VIEW) f1NiA•C ipa5 10 rf Atwu w0A• r —�� --- —--- _ — — WDAlc M OF r414 freP ,T •"'OVEO Ifl,•11Cw11fC1U1141 COMP 1 _ - 11411 C'(.1. rlg.I I 1 1 rrwMl ll ACralf CrlPl4l C06".1 --_ y.- ... _ t//+ .401 4nnnOvf 0It r• h4J1 •IY•nnv t lit;Gt>•r.lal r IN,n� r LW, A fl(v II r it l STATE OF ARIZONA ) ss. AFFIDAVIT COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) MICHAEL E. WOOLF, being first duly sworn upon his oath, deposes and says as follows: 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. 2 . Since 1974 I have been engaged in the practice of real estate law, and I have represented many builders, developers and contractors, including but not limited to, Venture Out In America, Inc. and Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. 3. As an attorney with the law firm of O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears, I rendered services to Venture Out In American, Inc. , in connection with the organization and development of the condominium recreational vehicle park located in east Mesa, Arizona. 4 . When Harry Bidwell left Venture Out in America, Inc. after it was completed to become the President of Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. , he asked me to assist Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. in acquiring appropriate zoning and plat approval to permit the development of an upgrade recreational vehicle park subdivision which was to be located upon approximately ninety (90) acres in Apache Junction, Arizona. He informed me that the development was to be patterned after the basic concept of Venture Out. 5. In early 1981, when representatives of Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. and I began discussing the proposed project with representatives of Apache Junction, it was suggested by Mr. Joe Gero, the head of the Planning Department, that the project be developed under the City' s PAD Zoning Ordinance, rather than - under the TH Zoning Ordinance. The suggestion was made because the underlying TH Zoning Ordinance contained a number of ambiguities and was very abbreviated in scope. Furthermore, we were advised that although the PAD Zoning Ordinance would permit the City to impose more restrictions on and have more control over the design of the proposed development, that correspondingly the City would have more discretion to approve design concepts which may not otherwise have been permitted under the TH Zoning Ordinance, assuming that such discretion was exercised in accordance with good planning. Since Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. intended its development to be developed as a first class RV resort, under stringent conditions including extensive open areas, and since 4 Arnow Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. was not requesting maximum density for the project site, Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. welcomed the opportunity to develop the project under the PAD Zoning Ordinance. An amicable working relationship based upon mutual cooperation developed between the City and representatives of Roadhaven. Both the City staff and Roadhaven representatives believed that the proposed project would be a finely designed project which would mutually benefit the developer, the City and the ultimate lot owners. 6. Except for one particular meeting at which I was present, I do not recall any specific concerns, warnings, require- ments or discussions relating to side lot line setbacks or minimum distances between recreational vehicles. The one meeting I do recall stands out in my mind because it was the first time that I recall hearing a reference to a "tip-out" or a "slide-out" . During that meeting, Mr. Bidwell indicated that the type of unit; owned by the typical lot purchaser at the development would be eight feet in width with one or two four foot tip-outs. Mr. Bidwell noted that the proposed lots within the development had sufficient length to accommodate any reasonably expected unit design changes. When asked how Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. intended to control the size and location of units within the development, Mr. Bidwell gave two explanations. First, he explained that the developer was going to install driveways and patios on each lot ..•. within the development, thereby fixing the specific location of the recreational vehicles. Secondly, the size and type of vehicle, together with all appurtenances, such as storage sheds, skirtings, awnings , and slide-outs would be controlled pursuant to recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and related rules and regulations. 7 . Following the discussion referred to in the pre- ceding Paragraph, there were no suggestions by any City repre- sentative relating to side setbacks or distances between trailers. Instead, Mr. Gero requested that copies of the Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions and related rules and regulations be provided to him. In fact, copies of those documents were provided to him and", he suggested certain modifications to them, which were made. 8 . The rules and regulations for the project, which were completed prior to final zoning and plat approval for Phase I of the project specifically permitted eight foot recreational vehicles with four foot tip/slide-outs. /61,416",irifisif Michael E. Woolf -2- STATE OF ARIZONA ) r ss. • County of Maricopa ) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of March, 1984 , by Michael E. Woolf Witness my hand and official seal. 4040,44,4;erne 41711./;n- Notary Public My Commission Expires: ! My Commission Expires Aug 12, 16,— r -3- 1. • LAW O' FICES OCONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH & BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION JAMES H 0 CONNOR11922 1978) SUITE 1800 FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BUILDING SUN CITY OFFICE HARRY J CAVANAGH WILBERT G ANDERSON KENNETH I TODD JOHN H WESTOVER JOHN H KILLINGSWORTH 3003 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE /.42 BERT G BESHEARS RALPH E HUNSAKER WILLIAM W DON CARLOS BALD L JACOBS RALPH E MAHOWALO PHOENIX, ARIZONA 65OI IOMAS A McGUIRE,JR, GEORGE H MITCHELLBELL PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING SUITE 102 ,CHARD J WOODS RICHARD E MITCHELL (602) 263 3611 10451 PALMERAS DRIVE ARTHUR P ALLSWORTH MAYOR SHANKEN RICHARD MSC SHANNON DONALD L CROSS SUN CITY,ARIZONA 85373 JEFFREY B SMITH JOLYON GRANT LAWRENCE H LIEBERMAN M C RAKE JR HARDING B CURE WILLIAM C WAHL,JR RICHARD C SMITH JAMES W ZIGLAR JOE E FORRESTER STEVEN 0 SMITH REPLY TO SCOTTSDALE OFFICE SCOTTSDALE OFFICE ROBERT 5 KANT K DAVID LINDNER MICHAEL E WOOLF JOHN R CALL GARY R CASE J VICTOR STOFFA DONALD E DYEKMAN 6831 FIFTH AVENUE,SUITE 200 HENRY L TIMMERMAN BRUCE D KELLEY SCOTTSDALE,ARIZONA 85251 FRANZULA M LESLIE HA BACHER MICROHAEL ERT E BROWN H W CARNAHAN (602)263 3843 BARRY M WOLFSON CALVIN L RAUP PHILIP C GERARD LARRY L SMITH JAMES R FELTHAM DAVID W EARL CHARLES J MUCHMORE ALEXANDRO ACOSTA,JR J TYRRELL TABER CHARLES F MYERS RICHARD H BIERMAN NOREEN L SHARP BRADLEY R JARDINE CAROL N CAMPBELL OUR FILE NO 9994-1 SCOTT A ROSE LESLIE E O'HARA ALAN S NOPAR 'WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER 263-3843 May 15 , 1981 Apache Junction Planning Department f Attn: Joseph Gero " 1001 N. Idaho Street Apache Junction, Arizona Re : Apache Junction Recreational Vehicle Park/Roadhaven Resorts , Inc. Dear Mr. Gero: .�. This letter is to supplement the information previously submitted to you on behalf of Roadhaven Resorts , Inc. with respect to the rezoning application recently filed for property located on South Idaho Street in Apache Junction, Arizona. Attached to this letter you will find the following Exhibits : 1. A revised legal description encompassing the entire 50 acre parcel (Exhibit 1) . 2 . Updated assessor ' s records showing current owners ship of property within three hundred (300) feet of the parcel - to be rezoned, along with current deeds for property that has recently transferred (Exhibit 2) . 3 . A brief narrative detailing the dimensions for cabanas , turn-outs , hangovers , set backs , etc. (Exhibit 3) . This Exhibit also refers to the developer's plans regarding a park identity sign. These provis]ons will either be incorporated into the Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions which are to be recorded against the Property or will be set forth in the rules and regulations to be adopted by the Homeowner ' s Association Board of Directors. 4 . A statement by the engineer explaining how drainage will be handled with respect to the retention areas and the pro- posed channel to be located on the south boundary of the Property (Exhibit 4) . LAW OFFICES 0 CONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH & BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Joseph Cero '"b. May 15, 1981 Page 2 • 5 . A statement by the engineer explaining the proposed sewer system (Exhibit 5) . 6. A statement explaining the sources of power, water , and telephone service and how refuse collection will be implemented (Exhibit 6) . 7 . A list of the proposed interior street names for the development (Exhibit 7) . 8 . Six copies of the Preliminary Plan plus one Sepik copy. 9. Four Maps setting forth the existing zoning and the existing developed portion of the Property. 10. One aerial photo of the Property and surrounding vicinity. 11. Four drainage maps. 12. Four maps delineating the location of proposed recreational buildings. 13 . Four drainage basin plans and cross sections . As you requested the following items are detailed on the accompanying plans and maps : (a) Width of boundary streets. (b) Detail of area within four hundred (400) feet of Property. a. (c) Typical lot indicated on map with detail cross- section showing lay-out and width of driveway. (d) Detail of entrances and emergency vehicle acress . (e) Clarification of all legends used on maps and plans. (f) Drainage flow in channel indicated. (g) Density calculations. (h) Designation of areas already approved for recreational vehicles and area to be rezoned. (i) Cross section of retention area . (j ) One foot non-vehicular easements adjoining major streets. ANA LAW OFFICES OCONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH & BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Joseph Cero May 15, 1981 Page 3 This letter is to further confirm and clarify certain of the matters which we discussed in your office on May 4 , 1981 . The developer' s ultimate goal is to subdivide the Property such that individual recreational vehicle lots can be sold to the public. The preliminary plat sets forth the proposed subdivision. The developer does not intend to phase this development. Once all necessary permits and approvals have been obtained, the developer intends to develop the entire recreational vehicle park. To insure a quality resort project and to give unit owners control over the recreational buildings and other common areas , the project will be subjected to a detailed set of Covenants , Condi- tions and Restrictions (the "Declaration" ) governing the use to which individual lots can be put, providing for common rights of enjoyment of the recreational areas and other common areas , pro- viding for assessments to insure that the project continuously will be properly maintained, etc. I am currently in the process of making some revisions to the draft set of the Declaration previously sent to you. Those revisions will include but not be limited to deleting Section 19 of page 4 of the Declaration. I do not anti- cipate any substantive changes . As I have mentioned elswhere in this submittal , the developer' s goal is to subdivide the property and sell individual lots . However, because of existing problems created by Arizona ' s newly enacted Ground Water Act , there is some question as to when Arizona Water Company, the franchised water company which serves the property, will be able to provide an assurance of an adequate supply of water for the developemnt. Until such an assurance can be provided (or an exemption obtained) the developer will not be permitted to record a subdivision map or obtain necessary sakes approval from the Arizona Department of Real Estate. I am hopeful that the developer will be able to convince the Arizona Department of Real Estate and the Arizona Department of Water Resources that the developer should, be granted an exemption from the "moratorium" on new developments. Our law firm has been successful in obtain- ing at least one such exemption for another client on the basis that a significant investment was made with respect to a Project before the new Ground Water Act went into effect. This exemption has been recognized by the Arizona Attorney General ' s office. This matter is also addressed in Exhibit 6 attached hereto. +• If we are successful in obtaining the requested zoning but are unsuccessful in obtaining an exemption from the sub- division moratorium, the developer intends to continue with its plans to develop the project in accordance with the attached LAW OFFICES O CONNOR,CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH &BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Joseph Gero May 15, 1981 Page 4 ..s . preliminary plat. Pending a resolution of the water problem, the developer will operate the project as a rental park. This is not prohJbited under Arizona ' s new Ground Water Act. However, because of the large lot nature of the project, it is not economi- cally feasible for the developer to continue the project as a rental park. Consequently, as soon as the water problem is resolved, the developer intends to convert the rental park project to a subdivision such that the unit sales can take place as soon as possible. For this reason we are asking that your department and the city council advise us of,at this time, all requirements and conditions to be imposed to permit us to subdivide the property. We are desperately striving to avoid a situation whereby we develop a rental park and find our- selves in a situation in which substantial new requirements will be imposed in the future as a condition to converting the rental park to a subdivision once the water problem is resolved. Although we are aware that certain city codes and requirements may change from time to time , we would like everyone to know that we are agreeing to a reduced density for the property and are proceeding with our proposed development plan in good faith based on our understanding that we will receive your continued cooperation and assistance with regard to this project. If the developer is initially forced to develop the project as a rental park project as a result of the water situation, the Declaration will not be immediately recorded. Instead, the use restrictions for the rental park will be set forth in Park Rules and Regulations which will be adopted. These will be consistent with the appl1_cable portion of the Declaration and those restrictions set forth in Exhibit 3 attached to this letter. The developer is cognizant of the city requirements for set-backs and other develop- - ment restrictions and these will be complied with. At such time as the project is approved for a subdivision, the Declaration will be recorded simultaneously with a Subdivision Plat. The Declarateon will be effective as of the date of recording. Throughout this letter I have been making reference to subdividing the property. I would like to make clear to you that the proposed project is not a mobile home park . Instead, it is a recreational vehicle (travel trailer) park . The vehicles themselves will never become permanently affixed to the lots. Furthermore , owners will not he permitted to construct homes or other permanent dwellings on the individual lots . Consequently , I feel that this project should not be governed by the provisions of Article 20 , Sections 2002 et seq. of the Town of Apache Junction City Code , insofar as those sections require lots in a subdivision to have a minimum of 8 , 000 square feet. The proposed lots in our project are significantly larger than the required lot size in a recreational • LAW OFFICES O CONNOR CAVANAGH,ANDERSON,WESTOVER,KILLINGSWORTH &BESHEARS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Joseph Gero May 15, 1981 Page 5 vehicle rental park and they provide ample space for the recrea- tional vehicles and attendant uses . My reading of the applicable portions of Article 20 of the City Code does not lead me to believe that those sections were meant to affect a project such as the one proposed in this instance. In case it is not apparent from the various maps and drawings submitted with this Application, this letter will confirm that the developer understands that the property is located within the boundaries of an area designated as being flood prone . Conse- quently, the developer is aware that all pads on all lots musts be above the vertical boundary for the 100 year flood levels . This letter will further serve to confirm that should any dedications be required of the developer in order for Broadway Road and Idaho Road to have a full legal width of fifty (50) feet, such dedications will be made. ,.•., Finally, please be aware that the developer is currently working on a proposed lighting plan for the project. The engineers were not able to prepare such a plan as of the date of this letter. It is presently proposed that some form of lighting will be available at the entrances to the park. I am not aware of the present plans for interior street lighting. After you have had the opportunity to review the enclosed materials , please feel free to contact us if there is any additional information which you need to evaluate our application. vs. Thank you for your continued courtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours , Michael E. Woolf For the Firm MEW/fs encl. cc : Scott Larsen - Harry Bidwell C '' " '' I 1 old Arf,cle X )e (prior P✓ior I; g/ o/8J1 1 m�dMeK.}-) ARTICLE 20 IF TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE: SEC 2001 USES PERMITTED: a. Any use permitted in the CR-3 zone b. Trailer is 4 c. Mobile home subdivisions, subject to the following: 1 . The number of mobile homes or travel trailers shall be limited to one (1 ) on each lot in such subdivision. 16 2. The height, yard, intensity of use, and parking regulations of the TH Zone shall apply to mobile homes or travel trailers located on lots in such subdivision. d. Trailer park, mobile home park or travel trailer park lot or parcel shall be not less than ten (10) acres and shall observe the minimum area standards set forth herein. e. Trailer parks and mobile home parks, subject to securing a use permit and the following: 1 . Each mobile home space shall have an area of not less than 3,000 square feet and a width of not less than 36 feet, and each travel trailer space shall have an area of not less than 1 ,000 square feet and a width of not less than 25 feet, except that the number or spaces designed or used for travel trailers shall not exceed 20% of the total number of spaces provided in such mobile home park. 2. Mobile homes shall be located on mobile home spaces so as to provide a minimum setback from the nearest edge of any interior drive or roadway of not less than eight feet and so as to provide a minimum setback from any mobile home space boundary not in common with the edge of any interior drive or roadway of not less than five feet, except that in the case of mobile home spaces having boundaries in common with two or more interior drives or roadways in the minimum setback from the nearest edge of interior drives or roadways shall be not less than 20 feet on the mobile home's entry side and not less than five feet on the mobile home's non-entry side. 3. Travel trailers shall be located on travel trailer spaces so as to provide a minimum setback from the - 56 - 1111 nearest edge or any interior drive or roadway of not less than • four feet and so as to provide a minimum setback from any mobile home space boundary not in common with the edge of an interior drive or roadway of not less than three feet, except that in the case of travel trailer spaces having boundaries in common with two or more interior drives or roadways the minimum setback from the nearest edge of interior drives or roadways shall be not I. less than 20 feet on the travel trailer's entry side and not less than three feet on the travel trailer's non-entry side. 4. Travel trailers may be located on mobile home ,r spaces but the minimum setbacks required of mobile homes shall be provided. 1 5. The location of mobile homes on travel trailer spaces shall be prohibited. 6. The minimum distance between mobile homes or travel trailers in the same mobile home park shall be 20 feet. 7. The minimum distance between mobile homes or travel trailers and buildings in the same mobile home park shall be 20 feet. 8. Each mobile home or travel trailer shall set back from all lot lines a distance of not less than 10 feet. 9. Service buildings to house toilet, bathing and -other sanitary facilities and utilities shall be provided as required by the Pinal County Health Department. 10. Minimum distance or setbacks required herein shall be the shortest of horizontal dimensions measured from the nearest portion of the sidewall of a mobile home or travel trailer, or from the patio cover, carport, cabana, ramada or similar appurtenances. 11 . A mobile home or travel trailer park and mobile s ' home or travel trailer subdivision of ten or more acres shall be screened around its periphery except for gates or access ways by an opaque solid fence or wall of not less than five feet nor more than six feet of height, measured on the fence from outside the park. 12. The height, yard and intensity of use regulations of the TH Zone shall apply to buildings located in mobile home parks but not the mobile homes or travel trailers, except that the area and width of the lot occupied by a mobile home park shall not be less than that required for lots occupied by other uses. - 57 — t I if lt 13. In order to permit flexibility in the develop- rr ment of mobile home parks, the strict application of regulations pertaining directly to an individual mobile home space or travel trailer space and to the location thereon of mobile homes and travel trailers need not be applied, provided any variation therefrom is consistent with the purpose of this Ordinance, open space is maintained at a ratio of two square feet for each square foot of covered area, and the average area per mobile home space or travel trailer space in the mobile home park is not less than 3,000 square feet for mobile homes or 1 ,000 square feet for travel trailers, except that there shall be no variation in required minimum distance between mobile homes, travel trailers, and buildings, and from all lot lines. 14. Evidence satisfactory to the Commission, of the ability and intention of the applicant to proceed with actual construction work in accordance with approved plans. SEC. 2002 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: Two stories or 30 feet. SEC. 2003 MINIMUM LOT AREA: 8,000 square feet. SEC. 2004 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 60 feet. SEC. 2005 MINIMUM LOT AREA PER TRAILER UNIT OR SINGLE TRAILER NOT IN A TRAILER COURT, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 2001-d and 2001-e: 8,000 square feet. SEC. 2006 MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 feet. SEC. 2007 MINIMUM SIDE YARDS: 10 feet each. SEC. 2008 MINIMUM REAR YARD: 10 feet. SEC. 2009 MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN MAIN BUILDING OR TRAILERS: 20 feet, except as required in Section 2310 for a rear dwelling. SEC. 2010 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. a. Permitted coverage: 25% of the minimum rear yard plus 50% of any additional space in the rear of the principal building. b. Maximum height: 20 feet. c. Maximum distance to main building: Seven feet. •i. - 58 - IAIM eiN d. Minimum distance to front lot line: 60 feet. f. Minimum distance to rear lot line: Four feet if building is not used for poultry or animals, 15 feet if building is used for poultry or animals. 4 a - 59 - ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET piliA NOTES /6) 04)17 ` 4i) 173 °() ITEM # i.1041/ MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: )1-65-"A' YES NO ABSTAINED VTCE_ MAYOR FTDSON .000NCILMAN. STEELSMITH .COUNCILMAN TAYLOR_CLO NC I LMAN in I V tio COUNCILMAN SHANKS .COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE UN/IN "^,OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Alma ITEM NO . 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT BY HARRY BIDWELL FOR A REDUCTION TO 16 . 5 FEET IN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TRAILER UNITS AND FOR A REDUCTION TO ZERO FEET IN THE SETBACK DISTANCE TO SPACE LINES FOR ROADHAVEN PHASES I AND II ( PZ-6-81 AND PZ-19-82 ) BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS : 1 . THAT A SIX (6 ' ) FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN A TRAILER UNIT AND A STORAGE SHED BE MAINTAINED AND A THREE (3 ' ) FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN AN AWNING AND A TRAILER BE MAINTAINED . FOR APPROVAL f:•. • • • • • an •c +.sa"� +C.,.a, ITEM NO . 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT BY HARRY BIDWELL FOR A REDUCTION TO 16 . 5 FEET IN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TRAILER UNITS AND FOR A REDUCTION TO ZERO FEET IN THE SETBACK DISTANCE TO SPACE LINES FOR ROADHAVEN PHASES I AND II (PZ-6-81 AND PZ-19-82 ) BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR RL )( FT f)VFRRIDF AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2 , THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY MANAGFR/CITY CIFRK 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , rACHF d l++�t�5y ''', /� l . ,�) �J I I p;,q[r s i,,Yet O W : Z qR/ZONP `pity 4 pache C unction March 14, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR,fND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ,4' FROM: CITY CLERK / SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARINGS ON BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 41-563.01, two public hearings are required prior to the City Council approving a one- time budget override. These hearings have been published in compliance with state law and are scheduled for the regular council meetings of March 20th and again on April 3rd. Immediately following the second public hearing on April 3rd, the council must convene in a special meeting in order to take the actual vote on the excess expenditure. At this time, the purposes of the expenditure must be stated along with the source of revenue used to finance these expenditures. In addition to the one-time override hearings, public hearings will also be held to solicit public input on the street improvement bonds. These public hearings will be held in conjunction with the ones on the override and will require council adoption of a resolution authorizing the bonds after the April 3rd hearing. Attached are copies of the memos previously distributed by the City Manager pertaining to both of these measures. Approver for Agenda at Item # First Reading / Jo kmc Second Reading ..1G_ Public Hearing - Old Business - New Business -Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHE ✓ '''tee#1"; ,:'*-A sPs " ft .. ik-: Vity o pache unction -9RizoNP' March 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SUGGESTED PROJECTS - OVERRIDE The -following is a list of possible projects that could be funded from the $800,000 plus that will be the subject of the May vote by the community. 1. Library 5,500 square feet = $400,000. 2. Prospector Park 1st place = $300,000. 3. Added space City Hall Complex = $190,000. These projects represent what I believe to be 3 of the most pressing needs of the City. The Library has been the topic of considerable ciscussion as well as the need to develop the park. The needed space in the complex is also well known. The attached drawings are alternative ways of providing the needed room. We will have more definitive cost estimates far before the next meeting. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 s+�. D.Tc 3/ C ; +,, Co •"-+Q(ex 4 a'c:1:T;ors SKei-ck: Aci.,;ni5+.-a-f ion- 13ui1Jinc 5 : _ . _ _. __ _ __ _ _ _ _ . . . . __ ;..._ ___.14___________ • ____: r_______ 3S' I . GO .1 _ --- I - , _ 40,,41‘ � / L as --+� / 444/ :///.1/ zl.s' : 14 / , / I ..• .3,. / - r• r\I'_— " •44/ / / / / / / / / 1/7/1 Proposed A.1c ; ion. ( Al-Fern.n+c zr 1) �� - Proposed AJJ '{,on_ MtilE„`a. c: AVGa AgF..3_ _ [(1'1.5' x 35') - ( I2'x 12') t ( 2.5'x 21.5')J = 21'1 12.5 SF - 144 5.F• + 531.5 s.F Arse wii.,:i = 3,1 0 G 5.F Ave' Ait.,2 = C(17.5' x 35') - (12'x12')] = 2;112.5 5.r. — 144 S.P. , Arcw 4if. a = 2,5c8. 5 5.F. i I . 1.- + i ... 1 - . I • -_--- - - 4. - /Mk P,,6I;c 1n)C•rK5 ! En a in.aar;n a / .410 .----..., rr 7I,14 ------ --- - ---' ------- - --- .-- .-- -- - --- - . — -• •- - ---- — -- N __ - I, � I - ___ ._- ___ -- - - - -- — - —W if--1- Pu61.G Wo�K, / EnsiQ�cri45 _ - '— - ---'-- I 4. , /2," /" ////7/ / . /// ./. / / / t / / / / / / 32' gu.ldin.�v / co mrr.•4iL;Ty SC�'Vicc$J / r. / / / / / / / / / // R-oposc. A cl J I -i on. tania — £XIS , gu l L p;n1 C areo._ = ( 3o' x 4 o' ) = i 6 o o S. F . Ar< o.. = 1So0 S. . ._ I - - - i 1 -', • - i - . - . i - I- I f I ' - . I t P'1 a.n 2;rt.o I _ o ri,r. a E. J 41 r. a - -- - - - ..i ,J - N _ -_ -- _ - - - I _1 - _- . — - - -. P1 ann,...g / E 0 no n.3 - 12• -- - -- -- - 9' Ehlialikk -114, • AI - PTaposccJ AdcL+iorL L.4 / qt 5tpa.-a+ion.. \\ — Pro pascJ A.:I.:1+ 4 ;0n. I 14.1.1o;nrr.....-t- Mcvc 4 Qe1oc4}'c. Public. \J - K5 / En,9in r, v I\o12i 1 c. to 1 of 4.1.e 2. 1oca+ior.s SV%o‘zn. a 6oVe I • • s _ .. i r i . - �- � . . - . ,- - • -- . - . . . i , 1 , 1 1 i • I . 1 s , PROPOSED COSTS: ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS: Area (Alt. #1) = 3,106 S.F. @ $35/S.F. = $108,710. Add. Area (Alt. #2) = 2,568.5 S.F. @ $35/S.F. = $ 89,898. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING/BUILDING/COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDINGS: Area = 1,800 S.F. @ $35/S.F. _ $63,000. PLANNING/ZONING BUILDINGS: Relocate Public Works/Engineering Building (Adjoining) = $2,000 Relocate Public Works/Engineering Building (Separate) = $2 ,000 TOTAL COST W/ALTERNATIVE #1 (Administration Building): Building Cost = $108,710 + $63,000 + $2,000 = $173,710 Contingency Fee = $173,710 @ 10% = $ 17,371 Subtotal = $191,081 A/E Fee = $191,081 @ 10% = $ 19,108 TOTAL = $210,189 TOTAL COST W/ALTERNATIVE #2 (Administration Building): . Building Cost = $89,898 + $63,000 + $2,000 = $154,898 Contingency Fee = $154,898 @ 10% = $ 15,490 Subtotal = $170,388 A/E Fee = $170,388 @ 10% = $ 17,039 TOTAL = $187,427 • PeACHF � G �� V � , that i gRrZoj • ity o� cipac1 e c 2unction March 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENTS - GAS TAX BONDS The attached information is the staff's best estimate as to the miles of street that could be paved if the voters were to approve the issuance of $1.5 million in Gas Tax Bonds. Gas Tax Bonds are permitted under Arizona law up to 50% of the yearly income from the State Gas Tax. Voter approval is required. There is no added cost to the community. The income from the gas tax is all that is needed to retire the bonds. The law also allows the bonds to be issued for up to 20 years, we are ,•. recommending 10. The City is currently realizing $649,000 from the Gas Tax. The remaining $400,000 would be used for maintence, as we are doing now. The program will not pave all of the dirt streets in the City, but it is the quickest way to pave almost one half; plus take care of a drainage problem Southeast of the dog track. The list of streets is advisory and is subject to your final approval . There would have to be a Council Resolution to place this on the ballot for the May election. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Alin, AM. • `{DitJ U75 &411ache &2unction - - INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 1984 TO: City Manager THRU: Director of Public Works Operations Supervisor FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: HIGHWAY USER FUND BONDING PROGRAM The following improvements are proposed for a 10-year, $1.5 million bonding program with a principal and interest payment per year of $250,000 for the City of Apache Junction: 1) Hilton (Superstition to Broadway) 2) Starr (Superstition to Highway 60) 3) Junction ( Idaho to Goldfield) 4) Fourth (Highway 60 to Goldfield) 5) Tepee (Highway 88 to Starr) 6) Tepee (Meridian to Delaware) 7) Shiprock (Meridian to Main) 8) Roundup (Meridian to San Marcos) 9) Tomahawk (Superstition to Highway 88) 10) Scenic (Starr to Goldfield) 11) Lost Dutchman (Meridian to Idaho) 12) Southern (Meridian to Delaware) 13) Southern (Raindance to Cortez) 14) Cortez (Southern to Highway 60) 15) Goldfield (Lost Dutchman to Southern) 16) Palm Springs Mobile Home Park Subdivision (Mariposa Road - 19th to Southern and 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd - Tomahawk to Mariposa) 17) Superstition Estates Subdivision (Moreno Drive - 18th to 20th; Apache Drive Coconino Drive - 17th to 20th; Papage Drive - 16th to 20th; 18th - Plaza to Coconino and 17th - Plaza to Papago 18) Pinal Street Drainage Problem (Warner to Cedar & 4th to Broadway) CITY MANAGER , ' March 1, 1984 Page two Items numbered (1-17) are street improvements which include a 2 in. A.C. overlay on native material at a width of 24 ft. Item number (18) is a surface drainage improvement. ) ) iii111411111i11111101iiilliiiiiddlidid ,1 .111dildiii111111141111111411414141441111 LOST DuTC010•11 E LOS/ OUT CROAR Ill VO .,,,. • ... ' . ... • • • ••• - s_rar_o.... al • I ssros.", a as...—. Z 1 r ,.. ---t-ii 1 2 i 1 . i •,.. . ! • 15 . • •,,, ., ..... .......m.immiiiimii..ftwo - ......_ t . A 1 g i i • ! .„„,,,,, . • • .! _.. : • al•••••••••‘' :I !. .0‘ as. a .-.MIsralm!iwalmotammosalmaramawwwwW•R ; s'' 2 :, s ‘,• sass_ .1"1..."'f I ;-- I ,Wo•••••••. k • .k . & V •'...:. . . , . , ..4 - l SLMAASY,T1011 Kw r._ .4 4 ,„ • • a son•slitioN r„.4) . : ) ,,......1,,, • •i_i-- r 1 ' i i fi z ...,.,, . I r 1I...ses•-• .1. _ _ 1 _ ▪ L,_,.._,........••.r.ics'itr..._. • t•rf 1 ' i•— f• r.i .i I V•°, Moo 1 0 E e i c.....L7_ • 21.4 _ 19 . 1.01,C0E , • • . ' - 20 TPA, :I A E • 22 • ' a s -41111, .., . .., -- • ! P• & 7,11," 1 & e E i i ..,,i , ..1 -•.,!1 E ....., .;Itti:. 1---_ a' A i .•-il'!LI e _ _t_a. ay. _ ,.,t A21t 2 2 'S i I • 0 IA' .16 ';G. r —, *ROADWAY • o, AVE it SA°ADAM. AVE • .•- -- : - 0 1 • _._.:. • -$- rt. g 'el •AA Ell L E •.' 1• ''" ! i s .... i ''''•4.4 ...0▪--.. i A i : A I . g ' . -.1 41•__,a_ . ,,_. •'''''.. % i'.'"' •,,...r •j, . .4 . au t..• il. to -------T • •!----:--2--."-' a-=- - ; ....,0,4 i ,!,•-f la -- -.1 ,, i .. , • ,... .4 A- '------t r E .2— 'E--1....' '••••••....4- ......, ; ,.•,,,, , , , . . - • _ ) ••,—.. 30 E : 2 9 ' .•- ' — , A i & 4—--4.44 - I 27 . ±-_ t . $azoen 0-, Alliiiiimpt ....- I,-r-... j . .,1 A90,1W1,1.2.AA-. ••:- S $ ' . t mir, RWI a .1.• ••• -. -, g •Ia.. . .-.1 .“. .....----.— . .. , .,...,.... 0 , ••• 1 awe 1 i -• 7 .A.ans•mt4•• e e r•-^ - e . L..L.,_._ ; •....... •In ar 01 i I ISMIMIEHREMill/MMED Mn""" AVE 1 i . , E . ....,, SOuVIII. .AV( 1...'- ...• rivtarr••••• ,vo. OFFICIAL f•••• .▪..1.- ! STREET NAMING MAP i APACHE JUNCTION, 32 ARIZONA .. ., ..._ ..M0.- I •••••••_Olt_ e•.......04-Al— AY- 1 .....4...,,1-............Art,..,,.p...a..., II - I ,.. It 1 i ISORO.41 0, Si II IS OR 0 All TOWNSHIP I NORTH,RN 8 EAST, ; GILA B SALT RIVER BASE 8 A ?. J▪r- MERIDIAN, PINAL COUNTY ARIZONA J1.2_ I — —a ••• ...wolf 111,I 1 .....,..1 Ma ,we --—--.—---—.— ...o....... ,... ......dos • •• Om mom am ••••u•noil--- —• — —.- — —.. —.— ....-'." ••••••• 1 'I 11 !.1 11 !III ii 11 /I 'I i )i 4 4 II 4 1 ;I 4 '1 I ,1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 4 4 1.1 01 4 II 1 ll tl 1 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Total Bonding Amount = $ 1,500,000 Assume Interest ($1,000,000 @ 10%) _ $ 100,000 Total $ 1,600,000 Bonding Consultant' s Fee = $ 100,000 Total $ 1,500,000 Pinal Street Drainage Project = $ 100,000 $ 1,400,000 TOTAL COST/MILE = $1,400,000 20 miles = $70,000/Mile Construction : (W/20% Contingencies) Jim's Estimate - $63,200/mile Nesbitt's Estimate - $57,660/mile 24' Width (2"/Native) Bentson' s Estimate - $50,610/mile Nesbitt's Estimate - $49,827/mile 24' Width (2" Recycled/Native) Nesbitt' s Estimate - $70,406/mile 24' Width (3" Recycled/Native) Engineering: Rich's Estimate - $8,000/mile (Working Days) Jim's Estimate - $6,300/mile (10% of construction - consultants' AM Ilk iallb. (.. CHF t . 4,0 i U y !#N P ii Z zJ M '1R/zoN P w COity o . ache 02unction March 13, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ;X1 FROM: CITY CLERK V,C) SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 268 - AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CITY CODE (MAGISTRATE COURT) The attached ordinance amends Chapter 5 of the City Code pertaining to the Magistrate Court. The amendments are as follows: Section 5-2-1: Amends the existing text by establishing a specific term of office for the City Magistrate which would end on April 30th of every even- numbered year with the new term to commence on May 1st of every even-numbered year. Also established are the specific reasons for removal from office. Section 5-2-2: Amends the existing text by establishing the . office of the Assistant City Magistrate with a specific term of office concurrent with that of the City Magistrate. Also outlined are the specific reasons for removal from office. This ordinance has been written without the emergency clause and will require two readings, at least twenty-four hours apart. If adopted by Council , the ordinance will become effective 30 days after the date of passage. ,, Approver for Agenda_ �`"v kmc 3 Dat Itern # First Reading L // Second Reed;ng oZ - Public Hearing - O;;J Business _IZNew Business -Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Aft. .odmik ORDINANCE NO 268 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE CHAPTER 5 MAGISTRATE COURT, ARTICLE 5-2 PRESIDING OFFICER, SECTION 5-2-1 CITY MAGISTRATE AND SECTION 5-2-2 _Fa ACTING CITY MAGISTRATE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PRO- VISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY \ = OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That Chapter 5 MAGISTRATE COURT, Article 5-2 PRESIDING OFFICER, Section 5-2-1 City Magistrate and Section 5-2-2 Acting City Magistrate, be amended to read as follows Section 5-2-1 City Magistrate The presiding officer of the Magistrate Court shall be the City Magistrate who shall be appointed by the City Council for a term of two (2) years commencing on May 1st of every even-numbered year and ending on April 30th of every even- numbered year, unless sooner removed for misfeasance, mal- feasance or non-feasance of office Section 5-2-2 Assistant City Magistrate In the absence of the City Magistrate, the presiding officer of the Magistrate Court shall be the Assistant City Magistrate. r The Assistant City Magistrate shall be appointed by the City f Council for a term of two (2) years comencing on May 1st of l every even-numbered year and ending on April 30th of every even-numbered year, unless sooner removed for misfeasance, malfeasance or non-feasance of office SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the pro- AIM ikk visions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by • reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1984 WENDELL J CLARKE MAYOR ORDINANCE NO. 268 Page One of Two ON IFI • ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: KO--( AV .4EXAND City ttorney l ORDINANCE NO. 268 x ?-t'; Page Two of Two :xP} , "� ire ,.s;e4;*' _` • tom\ ITEM NO . 11 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 268 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . rtCHF✓o 1V-1 , *t.,,,.A V - %, s1 ) s..' Z i '1Rizo P c ity o c ac/e 2unction March 14, 1984 TO: City Manager -/a) FROM: Building Official RE: Building Code Amendments Proposed ordinance 269 is to modify the 1982 Uniform Building Code to be consistent with the changes made to the 1979 Uniform Building Code with the exception of the proposed change to Section 305. (a) , which will require a survey on all lots to verify the building location. LF:sw Approver for Agenda Iee- Date Item # First Reading '3l?(`!W Second Reading Pubii3 Hearing Old uusiness New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ORDINANCE NO. 269 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REVISING SECTION 304 (a) PERMIT FEES, SECTION 305 (a) GENERAL AND TABLE 3-A OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1982 EDITION REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE • JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT: �alk. SECTION I IN GENERAL That Section 304 (a) is amended by adding the following 1. The building official may waive the fee for reconstruction or repair of any residence damaged by natural calamity, such as, but not limited to, fire, flood, tornado, strong winds That Section 305 (a) General is amended to read as follows All construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the building official, and certain types of construc- tion shall have continuous inspection by special inspectors as specified in Section 306. A survey of the lot shall be required by the building official to verify that the structure is located in accordance with the approved plans. It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to be accessi- ble and exposed for inspection purposes Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection. That TABLE 3-A - Building Permit Fees is amended to read as follows: [ TABLE NO. 3-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $700.00 No Charge $701.00 to $2,000 00 $10 00 plus $1 50 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof over $701.00 to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $32.50 for the first $2,000.00 plus $6 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001 00 to $50,000 00 $170 50 for the first $25,000 00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $283.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $3 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001 00 and up $433 00 for the first $100,000 00 plus $2 50 for each additional $1,000 00 or fraction thereof ORDINANCE NO. 269 Page One of Two ."t.j ♦. 2:,. ti :.fir f T'.'�".•�r-..'.'..T.. Amok Ordinance No 269 Page 2 Other Inspections and Fees 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $15 00 per hour 2. Reinspection fee assessed under provisions of Section 305(h) 15 00 each 3 Inspections for which no fee it specifically indicated $15 00 per hour 4. Additional plan review required _ by changes, additions or revi- sions to approved plans $15 00 per hour (minimum charge--one-half hour) SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1984. Wendell Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City orn alsk 832-0540 OFFICE. 3200 EAST MAIN STREET MESA, ARIZONA RAY ENTERPRISES HOMES, INC. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NO 21000 POST OFFICE BOX 636 MESA, ARIZONA 85201 March 20, 1984 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT WE STRONGLY OPPOSE ANY EFFORTS TO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL COSTS OF BUILDING A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME IN APACHE JUNCTION DUE TO A PROPOSED SURVEY OF EACH LOT FOR THE PURPOSE OF INDICATING SET-BACK REQUIREMENTS. TO REQUIRE THIS ADDITIONAL EXPENSE IN A PLATED SUBDIVISION SUCH AS APACHE VILLA IS UNREASONABLE. SINCERELY, RAY ENTERPRISES HOMES, INC. BY J. lade Soelberg gee G, xx es 9m^ar'� axe .Yw? v y pt4 r' t :ar ITEM NO . 12 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 269 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PQACHE� ` j } ,..: ' ,.il U ,� Z pfi s r-aIF~ Y, ,` . `Oity o C rac/ e ounction March 14, 1984 TO: City Manager FROM: Building Official RE: Litter Pursuant to your instructions, enclosed is proposed Ordinance Number 270 to address the problem of litter on new construction sites. LF:sw Approver for Agenda //�—, p^1 Item # First Fea::ir�g �- ' /3 Second Road n Publit.: I1 wring OH+ i:uS!r.:a3 /,<;.w Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ORDINANCE NO. 270 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE 9-2 REMOVAL OF LITTER, BY ADDING SECTION 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES AND SECTION 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, r� AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That Chapter 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION, Article 9-2 REMOVAL OF LITTER, be amended by adding Section 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES and Section 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL, to read as follows. Section 9-2-11 Construction Sites In addition to all other requirements of this Code, it shall be a condition for the continuation of a building permit that a "litter" receptacle be provided, on site, for all buildings or structures of Group A, B, E, H, I, and R, Division 1 occupancies. Said "litter" receptacle shall be of such design as to insure that all materials deposited therein will not be blown out during heavy winds, shall have a minimum capacity of three cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the building or structure under construction and shall be of a type approved by the Building Official. The Building Official may issue a Stop Work Order for any [ building or structure if said litter receptacle, when required, is not provided at the inception of the framing stage of construction = Section 9-2-12 Inspection Approval In addition to all other requirements of this Code, it shall be a condition of inspection approval for all buildings or structures under construction that the construction site be free of all litter • The Building Official may issue a Stop Work Order when inspection reveals that any construction site is not being maintained free of litter. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the pro- visions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof Ordinance No 270 Page One of Two 01114 SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessary for the preservation of peace, health and it% sxz._p f safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1984. WENDELL J CLARKE - - MAYOR ATTEST• KATHLEEN CONNELLY - City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney Ordinance No 270 Page Two of Two ,1111111, ITEM NO . 13 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 270 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . FIRST READING ( Without the Emergency Clause ) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES C 40, g� � � CIL) ITEM # ' MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: VI YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR , COUNCILMAN HILL COUN!CIL1 PN! SHANKS ✓ VICE_MAYOR EDSON COU^lCILPlAN DAP,IANO COUNCILMAN STEELSPLITb \\:// _MAYOR_CLARKF , UNANI!IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (i' !. IP" ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 'al SECONDED BY: )1,411AV . 40 ICES NO ABSTAINED COUNC I LMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAt! DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN. HILL sv/ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIr^. S IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL .► Amok a ITEM NO . 13 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 270 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE , AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote if not unanimous , the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 270 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 270 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE , CHAPTER 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION , ARTICLE 9-2 REMOVAL OF LITTER , BY ADDING SECTION 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES AND SECTION 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL ( With the Emergency Clause ) ITEM NO . 13 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 270 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE , AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 270 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . St —3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 270 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE , CHAPTER 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION , ARTICLE 9-2 REMOVAL OF LITTER , BY ADDING SECTION 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES AND SECTION 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL ( With the Emergency Clause) PQACHF jez F 88rs � : ^ i. r 3z,. gR/ZONP COity on' cpacke &unctzon March 13, 1984 Approver for Agenda Date Item # MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE D OR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCII..LrtLig/,,�I �i First Reading �� THROUGH: CITY MANAGER Second Reading ,7.) )0/ Pubh:. Hearing FROM: LIBRARIAN - Old Business — SUBJECT: RETENTION OF TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE �NzW BuSineSS Consent Agenda The Library is in critical need of retaining the services of its full time Library Clerk. Dorothy Sanchez came to the Library January 3, 1983, as a CETA worker. When that program ended, she was retained on a temporary basis. In this time period she has proved herself an invaluable employee, providing continuity to library services, especially in the area of circu- lation procedures. Mrs. Sanchez is in charge of keeping the daily circu- lation count, maintaining the weekly receipts, sending the overdue notices, unloading the books from the bookdrop, and maintaining the charge-out machine. Her handling of these areas has allowed us to make maximum use of volunteers at the circulation desk for checkout procedures. As most of our volunteers work only a three-hour shift per week, the loss of daily continuity in this area would definitely work a hardship on the library's operation. Of course Mrs. Sanchez has had considerable experience in working at the circulation desk when volunteers have had to cancel or have failed to report for a shift. These tasks alone are very necessary to the smooth operation of the Library, but Mrs. Sanchez has some other duties which are just as important. Since her employment began, the Library has added a copy machine requiring both regular maintenance and an operator to handle patron requests for copies. The Library has also added another tele- phone near the circulation desk which Mrs. Sanches answers most of the time. Book renewals, book requests, directional questions, and informational questions are often telephoned by patrons. Working with the Librarian, Mrs. Sanchez is currently involved in a major renovation and update of the Library's vertical file which had fallen into disuse because of neglect. Collecting pamphlets and clipping newspaper articles for potential patron use is time-consuming, but vital since informa- tion of this type is seldom available in book form. Programming will also suffer if this Library Clerk position is not continued because Mrs. Sanchez has been helpful in assisting the Librarian with puppets and flannel board stories for story times with preschool children. The bottom line is this. To retain Mrs. Sanchez as a full-time temporary position until July 1, 1984, when, hopefully, her position would be established as a full-time permanent one, will require 13 additional weeks of funding (April 1 - June 30) . At her current rate of four dollars per hour, and with 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ..... ...... QA CHEE ,, t! n �W U i{l 0, k11 l,, yi Z A/R/ZoNP V i/y o . pache 09unction Page two of Memorandum to City Council, dated March 13, 1984 a forty hour work week, that will amount to $2,080.00. If her position is allowed to expire, the operation of the Library will be severely curtailed. In order for remaining staff to absorb her work load, many of the Library's newer services would have to be dropped and much of the Librarian's time would be spent in performing routine clerical tasks. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 March 17, 1984 To The Mayor and Members of the City Council, Apache Junction : I understand that the continued employment of an assistant at the Apache Junction Library is in question, and may be considered at meetings of the City Council Monday and Tuesday evenings. As a concerned citizen of this city, I would like to urge the permanent employment of Dorothy Sanchez. I know her help is needed at the library and that she is a dedicated worker who has a genuine interest in the position. Dorothy spends many off-duty hours attending meetings or taking care of other needs of the library. Without her services, the library would be less able to serve the citizens of our community to its fullest, and I believe that some programs might be cancelled because of -the extra work put upon the shoulders of our professional, paid librarian. Si c rely, 70 Ali ce Polomskey March 20, 1984 To the Mayor and members of the Apache Junction City Council : The Library Board of Trustees wish to appeal to the City Council to keep the present LibraryClerkts position on at her present level. This is necessary to ensure a smooth and even function of the basic library needs at its present level of efficiency. The Library Board would also like to request that the Lib- rary Clerk position become a full time employee in the up- coming 1984-1985 budget, Thank you. Sincerely,, Jan Hiller, President Apache Junction Library Board of Trustees ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET a NOTES s Y'Yfr 49 I )ly‘llif:di • ,jd,0 ITEM # MEET I NG OF (Ilya MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY : Y S NO ABSTAINED COMIC II MAN MMIANO . COUNCILMAN HILL . COHNC I_LJ"AN TAYLOR _.C_OINC II MAN .SHANKS _ IC.F MAYOR EIDSON V _COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH MAYOR CLARKE UNAIIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • • .00146. • ♦t"- rz'j'SL;.a' +��s m''im c'Ka:a- r"'yeyX.!�:`�-x.' G _ • ITEM NO . 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT MRS . DOROTHY SANCHEZ BE RETAINED AS A TEMPORARY FULL-TIME LIBRARY CLERK FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTEEN WEEKS UNTIL THE END OF THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR ON JUNE 30 , 1984 . MATERIAL WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE WORK SESSION Ank. Alm Ilk i x? ✓G 4 `1 0 '. O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ,l r" z ZONP Vity a c479 ache ounctian W E McDANIEL Director Al.\ March 20, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: W.E. McDaniel, Director of Publ''c Safety W E - THROUGH: Michael McNulty, City Manager 4, SUBJECT: BID PD-84-1 Emergency Generator On March 19, 1984 at 10:00 a.m. BID PD-84-1 was opened at City Hall. Having received only one bid, from Niels Detroit Diesel of Phoenix, for $19,841.00 with the option of a $2,000.00 trade-in on the Police Department's used generator. I recommend that Neils Detroit Diesel be awarded the BID PD-84-1 to replace the current out dated emergency generator which no longer is compatible with our needs. WEM/al Approver for Agenda 7, 1 o Item # First Reading `j / / Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business ✓New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 r. QP.0 P w,� HF ✓G2 �� bull lhI °ts; '�•+ a ift U t r't;,+ ' ; , t' z z � 4 r 3 'IRIzoNP c6 o pacLie Cunction DIESEL EMERGENCY GENERATOR SET — PD-84-1 MARCH 19 , 1984 Those Present: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Dan Scott , Administrative Lieutenant Lori V. Clark, Deputy City Clerk A public notice was published one time March 9 , 1984 , in the Mesa Tribune , inviting bid proposals for a New Detroit Diesel powered 35 KW Emergency Generator Set. The written bids were to be submitted by 10 : 00 a.m. , on March 19 , 1984 , in compliance with bid specifications. The bids were opened and read by City Clerk Kathleen Connelly as follows: Neils Detroit Diesel , Inc. 2602 South 19th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85009 $19 ,841 . 00 with trade in option - 2,000. 00 $17 ,841 . 00 --7...-yr_e-( V , e.P0A-__ Kathleen Connelly L ri V. Clark City Clerk Deputy City Clerk WITNESS : 02,4,itt,.',//4 iC Dan Scott Administrative Lieutenant lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ,... ,.. Page one of two NEILS DETROIT DIESEL, INC. 2602 South 19th Avenue [1 Phoenix, Arizona 85009 QUOTATION No 1617-3-84 Please refer to this number In your correspondence TO APACHE JUNCTION POLICE D A:Ti"NT Date March 19, 1984 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, Ariz. 85220 REF. "PD-84-1, Emergency Generator Set" Attention: Lt. Dan Scott We are pleased to quote on the items listed below in accordance with the following plans and specifications. Terms and conditions shown below and on reverse side are also made a part of this quotation. rF , ,tr: . -, One (1) new Detroit Diesel powered 35 :l Emergency Generator Set using the following components. , , M .. 17 n 1.• 1;e t"• t.•[2!•-En p- •1+:;d " i _aRr 71 '5v .. gine ' = Detroit Diesel 3-53N !` "-- Radiator High Ambient Skid Base .u a6•',:t t, i' :, 11i1 •1 Includes 8 hr. fuel tank , r1♦I, is fJ t ttl)' ,1i 1. , .i, Isolators +7"i75 " 1 •1Stiles ' . , Generator ,4,, ,, „ , Lima 2% regulation Control Panel Automatic Start (Cycle Crank) Voltmeter, anmter, hertz:eter 1r , ‘Selector switch ^. I .:f t °'f '^''1,.1,•,rz• ;t"r,, Automatic shutdowns Cr, indicator lights for high water temperature ''''.".". Low oil pressure ff-t"t•Itil t,09;r„ te.01+,mt F'TI K1 b, ? Oversoeed 131.31S!rL,9"77 ! O'etJY.‘I-1'7:,:. 7G ,,79:} RI Y})V,•r,. i '31113 t1.7 3 t'3.43 SU:1141031.CM :fi Lk ,,A .}rf.S 1,'!1 I:i 7 f 11.1.'11. ? t4:1?, +1:R:Overcrank • i oink` zit ru:iarw easy*1y a:� md�n.'<'c�'r't^.t+.:t it y 92 ; �tti,. `lgine Gauges for: to s;4..t. To 1.tej ,(:t3.47/111st1c tk'e s.tr;a ',r=�,^: ;.dti,,cy fcc1:1�ao +da r�^ :!,I3',rater tellIPeraturQ .,.a,)7ti 1/13word +5) ,!:.,, tL •s$ta i c..., .xf=rI e^.e r nxt-cv via Oil Pressure ,su .a c:1 w,:f;asrt• ,t1r71,1 1 f^:Ir.g'!47!'R:K 19ti.'tilr «f.Ji,n,r1 or n.;:.11r+ii --ii,11,,v;;attery Voltage:==,mild:,r~3sasangxs z7t.13/0"::17-11 ;1tdi,art‘5".1.to•,1ss\iHour Meter y •'.t,:wricl rt,�a.!•:» Circuit Breaker 100 MID U.L. Approved Automatic Transfer Switch ""' "'''"..!l;fark d:-'3 pole, 240 volt in Nema 3R enclosure Cleaner ,. :.t _....3...J "r. :d.t. D:1. .(Grp Y;'3:n•nil.,� _Type "=7,q'Cs "' y: :D'. .,.:•fii Air • •� � Muffler "^ ��:: +ar,:v,,c!g""1, •1 w.o tuz r nd kfCritical attenuation W'i s�'.?a n:as Battery TTExide 3D _ 7tit __' !o'• •rhf i f wa,us 03 st! +a 1+ia.ea,317'(.[. Charger In Control panel This quotation will be considered withdrawn unless accepted in writing on or before NEILS DETROIT DIESEL, INC Terms SIGNATURE Accepted By TITLE Date SALESMAN WHITE—Sales Contract Copy,CANARY—Customer copy, PINK —Sales Copy,GOLDENROD —Service Copy Page 2 of 2 NEILS DETROIT DIESEL, INC. 2602 South 19th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85009 QUOTATION No 1617-3-84 Please refer to this number in your correspondence TO APA JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT Date Mard19, 1984 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, Ariz. 85220 m, REF. "PD-84-1, Emergency Generator Set" Attention: Lt. Dan Scott We are pleased to quote on the items listed below in accordance with the following plans and specifications. Terms and conditions shown below and on reverse side are also made a part of this quotation •tcr •.•v. 3V ' 77 /T::•,4.A•1 e (Continued) , • . , , •17 r• Engine Heaters , 7 ... .„, KIM Enclosure • , 1c,;I 1 •Ilef ISOUnd Attenuated . Price F O.B. Job Site $19,841 00 , II • • • •••,• • ; • • • Option: Trade in old set (subtract) 2,000.00 V I 14• '40-." .; • . ./ • qt'Al Note. Unit cures completely assembled and tested ready for installation in two pieces. .P pc r•-., • • , ,t) • •• 011.12,110 9V3"/.14117.14.". ••••• (1) Enclosed engine, generator gr, accessories • ,1:04-)71/./PAA,..r..•03 (2) Enclosed automatic transfer switch. ..s 44433.4, q • 14 C•i/ p1..$41 s . . /Int.; -3 MI eliN* r w tv,3% •.,,u,t;•4031ciir . •' " '.i' CI hip../ Ir.. :11+41 ?:11.1411 troot .1!.d+/7, ',pp si•-7.4*(4•"+V 4,1;1 f Arti)/. i,t t,• 4)4 t3r171-le DAIt'41 it1313,14 text•33,333v•I 33 t. 5•1t-33 .0,043 /ct i34.-wt-3.ttu-s '.3..taloY3t! :trot,z•tir.tonv“:,3 rt. s3 dtit.12,!S74, ..t.r 1..t. .;,3:3fmts vromq C.4”41;) (17 t 11331.4..3 •svtiliarjse.13,1,: rt.:35,1 ..3ver' sot:-.;?3.Dacati :sou '11.tur,.'"•-•'1tilr .14 ,)".•% es;isgv.,44 1..101,1•11 Z!".111 3- ti Of. 'I. %':11 1,1 1"1 hmg • 71?..T:14 ,4%..ytt,1111.1.", 4 14 s, waflks 4-19-84 This quotation will be considered withdrawn unless accepted in writing on or before N_ELLS DETROIT I ESEL, INC. Terms SIG URE Accepted By Product Sal s Manager TITLE Date Ron McCulla SALESMAN WHITE —Sales Contract Copy,CANARY—Customer copy,PINK—Sales Copy,GOLDENROD —Service Copy An /11 PQACHF Ci OF, x gR�Z0�1P V Zty On L pacvGe C unction NOTICE TO SOLICIT BIDS - PD-84-1 The City of Apache Junction is soliciting bids for the following: One (1) New Detroit Diesel powered 35 KW Emergency Generator Set using the following components: Engine Detroit Diesel 3-53N Radiator High Ambient Skid Base Includes 8 hr. fuel tank Isolators Stiles Generator Lima 4% regulation Control Panel Automatic Start (Cycle Crank) Voltmeter, ammeter, hertzmeter Selector switch Automatic shutdowns & Indicator lights for high water temperature Low oil pressure Overspeed Overcrank CEngine Gauges for:Water temperature Oil Pressure Battery Voltage Hour Meter Circuit Breaker 100 amp U.L. Approved Automatic Transfer Switch 3 pole, 240 volt in Nema 3R enclosure Air Cleaner Dry Type .-. Muffler Critical attenuation Battery Exide 8D Charger In Control panel Engine Heaters Kim Enclosure Sound Attenuated Note: Unit must come completely assembled and tested ready for installation in 2 pieces. All bids must be sealed and designated as "PD-84-1 , Emergency Generator Set" and submitted prior to Monday, March 19, 1984, at 10:00 a.m. , at 1001 N. Idaho Rd. , Apache Junction, Arizona , at which time and place the bids will be opened and read as a matter of public record. For additional information, please contact Administrative Lieutenant, Dan Scott, at 982-8260. A‘tfita-g) Kathleen Connelly City Clerk Published March 9, 1984. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ti ITEM # ID MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: CU:LYN\ SECONDED BY : Jtnr'N-'Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR CO UNC I LMAN DAM IANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON _ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Amok I\ i • • • • 7 gg _- Y ``s.,.'r ITEM NO . 15 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYORAND1CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT 1je11 1)I BE AWARDED THE BID FOR PD-84-1 , 35 KW EMERGENCY GENERATOR SET IN THE AMOUNT OF \� �� . MATERIAL WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE WORK SESSION PQACHE j U 1 Z 'IR/zoNP Vitt' o' C4pache ounctzon March 20 , 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY C IL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER r FROM: CONTROLLER SUBJECT: COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR IBM SYSTEM 34 As you are aware, we invited bid proposals to upgrade the disk storage (64 megabytes to 128 megabytes) and memory (96K to 128K) of our IBM System 34 . The three bids that were received by 10 : 00 a.m. , Monday, March 12, 1984 , were opened and read, the results of which are attached. .•. I am recommending that we award the bid to Bruce Baum Associates , 523 Fourth Street , San Rafael , California 94901 , the lowest bidder with a cost of $6 , 725. 00 , delivered and installed. I will be available for any questions. KL/lvc Approver for A ccnd1 �tg Ite --4n—Or First Reading 3 l Second Reading — Public Hearing Old Business aZNew Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Alm. 4010. PQACHE 1► ,, i tFIpSYt�t� , ,, O' `r o .a � .; Z V N FEE -* fit'1RizoNP 'il� o� pace unction 4., COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR IBM SYSTEM 34 F-84-1 MARCH 12, 1984 Those Present: Lori V. Clark, Deputy City Clerk Keith Lewis, Controller Elaine James, Deputy City Clerk A public notice was published one time March 1, 1984, in the Mesa Tribune, inviting bid proposals for Computer Hardware Additives for the IBM System 34. The written bids were to be submitted by 10:00 a.m. , on March 12, 1984, in compliance with bid specifications. The bids were opened and read by Deputy City Clerk Lori V. Clark, as follows. Bruce Baum Associates 523 Fourth Street San Rafael , California 94901 $6,725.00 Anderson-Moon Associates P.O. Box 1852, 6607 Seashore Drive Newport Beach , California 92663 $9,328.00 Systems Engineering Services, Corp. 8030 N. 5th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85020 $8,000.00 WITNESS: 7-76}Lf V (7:11.aAJ/ _ clevu'il..2 ‘. ,,k,(1‘zz_l Lor' V. Clark Elaine James Deputy City Clerk Deputy City Clerk Keith Lewis Controller lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1)-/ I 4.3)1,0-1 ' \NP) /D-6 ITEM #_ \ (i) MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: c/4:5)". "' YES NO ABSTAI NED VICE MAYOR _FTnSON. V COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH ^I TAYLOR R '/ COUNCILMAN //, . COUNCILMAN HTI _COUNCILMAN SHANKS ,LOUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL :c- K Y+'.a's'".5=�7"Y'+�7^'.afs. '1 ...K!5 " - - -...- v 'd.. '1 rYM'�{�ji`zYF".aT� l�3�1^•$a.- • ITEM NO . 16 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT j llja w4 dr ."rri. BE AWARDED THE BID FOR F-84-1 , COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR THE IBM SYSTEM 34 , IN THE AMOUNT OF Q1,),5 Agaik In. P?ACHE ✓G -,_ s, qR/Z` Np, (nty U75 &4 padre 02unctiWn Approver for Agenda L-__ Amok at Item # First Reading `--Y O /7 Second Reading March 13, 1984 - Dublic Hearing - OId Ousiness __ /New Business MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITVC1O NCIL ----Consent Agenda THROUGH: CITY MANAGER!! 1/ FROM: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTpe,,-(' SUBJECT: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM RESIGNATIONS AND NOMINATIONS Attached are letters of resignations received from EOAT members resulting from changes in eligibility status- David Alexander, Bob Beeson, Larry Cline, Ross Greves, Roger Short, James Tuvell , and Ann Lorenzo. The following motion is proposed for accepting the resignations at the March 20, City Council meeting: "Be it resolved by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the resignations of Ross Greves, David Alexander, Larry Cline, Roger Short, Bob Beeson, James Tuvell , and Ann Lorenzo from the Economic Opportunities Action Team be accepted with special commendation for services rendered to the City of Apache Junction in its economic development efforts. " Nominations are offered in the various categories now vacant. All nominees have agreed to serve on the Economic Opportunities Action Team if appointed. Talent bank applications are attached as provided by nominees. Vacancies which can not be filled at this time can be filled at a later date as nominees become available. A proposed motion for appointment of nominees at the March 20, City Council meeting follows for consideration: "Be it resolved by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the following persons are hereby appointed to the Economic Opportunities Action Team: 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 LOCAL OFFICIAL CATEGORY Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce President or designee SANDY SMITH . Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee Chairman (NO NOMINEE) . (To be designated prior to March 20, 1984) Pinal County Planning & Zoning Commission (NO NOMINEE) . FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CATEGORY Savings and Loans DAVID NICODEMUS . EDUCATORS CATEGORY Centeral Arizona College --- Apache Junction Campus TOM HARPIN . Apache Junction School District TOM JOHNSON . PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CATEGORY Attorney ( NO NOMINEE ) . Title Insurance RUTH ABBOTT . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CATEGORY Contractor TERRY SECOR p 3-13-84 CURRENT STATUS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIFS ACTION TEAM LOCAL OFFICIALS CATEGORY Mayor or City Council Member Wendell J. Clarke Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce President Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee Chairman Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission Member Tony Vehon Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission Member City Manager Mike McNulty FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CATEGORY LABOR CATEGORY Savings and Loan Labor/Work Force John Granillo United Bank Bob DeBow Valley National Bank Ronald Ward PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CATEGORY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CATEGORY News Media Bob Burd Architect Henry Steelsmith Attorney Developer Harold Christ Accountant Varnum Irvine Contractor/Developer Wendell Clarke Insurance Mike Davis Real Estate Development Keith Stachar Bond Counselling UTILITY SERVICES CATEGORY COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY Water Daniel Sharp Retailer - Small Herb Jordan Electric Conrad Atwood/ Retailer - Large Tourism - Industry Ilene Taylor Gas Richard Burklund EDUCATORS CATEGORY Central Arizona College - Apache Junction Campus Apache Junction School District January 17 , 1984 • Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction thru Robert DeBow and John Schoep Honorable Mayor and Council : Please accept my resignation from the Apache Junction Economic Opportunity Action Team effective 1/17/84 . As you are aware several individuals have associated together with the purpose of incorporating an entity known as Apache Junction Economic Development , Inc. It is our hope that once the corporation is properly formed, that the corpor- ation and the action team can coordinate their efforts with the goal of establishing or expanding industries and business which will provide employment opportunities in the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. I personally thank you for the opportunity of serving on the Apache Junction Economic Opp- .-. ortunity Action Team. Sincerely, January 17 , 1984 .►. Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction thru Robert DeBow and John Schoep Honorable Mayor and Council : Please accept my resignation from the Apache Junction Economic Opportunity Action Team effective 1/17/84 . As you are aware several individuals have associated together with the purpose of incorporating an entity known as Apache Junction Economic Development , Inc. It is our hope that once the corporation is properly formed, that the corpor- ation and the action team can coordinate their efforts with the goal of establishing or expanding industries and business which will provide employment opportunities in the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. I personally thank you for the opportunity of serving on the Apache Junction Economic Opp- ortunity Action Team. Si erely, January 17 , 1984 Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction thru Robert DeBow and John Schoep Honorable Mayor and Council : Please accept my resignation from the Apache Junction Economic Opportunity Action Team effective 1/17/84 . As you are aware several individuals have associated together with the purpose of incorporating an entity known as Apache Junction Economic Development, Inc. It is our hope that once the corporation is properly formed, that the corpor- ation and the action team can coordinate their efforts with the goal of establishing or expanding industries and business which will provide employment opportunities in the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. I personally thank you for the opportunity of serving on the Apache Junction Economic Opp- ortunity Action Team. Sincerely, 4-2\-4?, January 17 , 1984 • Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction thru Robert DeBow and John Schoep Honorable Mayor and Council : Please accept my resignation from the Apache Junction Economic Opportunity Action Team effective 1/17/84 . As you are aware several individuals have associated together with the purpose of incorporating an entity known as Apache Junction Economic Development , Inc. It is our hope that once the corporation is properly formed, that the corpor- ation and the action team can coordinate their efforts with the goal of establishing or expanding industries and business which will provide employment opportunities in the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. I personally thank you for the opportunity of serving on the Apache Junction Economic Opp- • ortunity Action Team. •ncerely, 1,11v. V_ January 17 , 1984 • Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction thru Robert De]3ow and John Schoep Honorable Mayor and Council : Please accept my resignation from the Apache Junction Economic Opportunity Action Team effective 1/17/84 . As you are aware several individuals have associated together with the purpose of incorporating an entity known as Apache Junction Economic Development , Inc. It is our hope that once the corporation is properly formed, that the corpor- ation and the action team can coordinate their efforts with the goal of establishing or expanding industries and business which will provide employment opportunities in the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. I personally thank you for the opportunity of serving on the Apache Junction Economic Opp- ortunity Action Team. Sincerely, I ) 1306 EAST MAIN STREET/MESA,ARIZONA 85203/(602)248-4383 March 8, 1984 eIN John Schroph City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear John, Please accept this letter as my resignation on the Economic Opportunity Action Team. As we discussed, Dave Nicodemus would be the appropriate representative for First Federal. I have enjoyed the opportunity to work on EOAT. Please inform me if I can be of further assistance. ,ram" S' cerely, Ann Lorenzo Regional Manager Vice President YOUNG, SMITH & PEACOCK, INC MEMBER NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE AND OTHER PRINCIPAL EXCHANGES (602)264 9241 FINANCIAL CENTER 3443 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85012 February 7, 1984 Mr. Robert DeBow, Chairman Apache Junction Economic Development Action Team c/o United Bank P. 0. Box J Apache Junction , AZ 85220 Dear Bob: I hereby tender my resignation, effective immediately, from the Economic Development Action Team. I am no longer a resident of Apache Junction and feel it would be inappropriate for me to con- tinue to serve on the committee in light of that fact. Apache Junction has a bright future and the economic development efforts of the community already have, and will continue, to benefit the area. Thank you for the opportunity to serve. I learned much through my involvement with the Committee and hope I contributed somewhat to its accomplishments. I am pleased to hear that you are recovering well from your recent surgery. I hope to see you soon. Very truly y urs, . Ja s uvell ice; resident JJT :km cc: John Schoeph rNyp,CHF ✓ O U • ; ' i' ; Z --- T--f'- gRIZON t C- 71cc/ie �2-Inchon TALENT BANK APPLICATION eCO.4OM/G o# 1 O vl T e-f FOR 4cT/o.'1) T/9M BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 2/14/84 NAME: Thomas G. Johnson TELEPHONE: 982-5146 (home) 982-1110 (officE ADDRESS: 812 E. Hondo ZIP CODE: 85220 OCCUPATION. Elementary School Principal (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: MA in education 69 sem. hours (post graduate) PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO.NStJNITY ACTIVITIES: Lost Dutchman Days Parade Committee member 1984 Apache Junction Kiwanis (President) ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: Amok NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. T �_ th 4 �• @�p LllLVllUIiLLeC, L ulllilLJl }� nicco hori d Ly the Maya, ulld C,,Lacil• A C---- Revised 6/19/81 S1gnature of Applicant/7 ` 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 1Ny ACNE✓ U A ' I3i• O :- '94)/Z0N� ?tzi on . ?uucrZe 2unction TALENT BANK APPLI CATI ON .� Ecoa•.4.c Opeoier-0401MIS- FOR /JAG "Tr 4.✓ 7r2,?,t1 BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 2/17/84 NA_' : Tom Harpin TELEPHONE: 983-1476 (home) 982-7261 (offic ADDRESS: 1495 E Southern, #3, A.J. , AZ ZIP CODE: 85220 OCCUPATION. Counselor, C.A.C., Apache Junction Center (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: Masters of Counseling (M,C.) Bachelor's Degree (B.A.) in Psychology PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO:DiUNITY ACTIVITIES: Board of Directors/ EPI Center Family Services Board of Directors/ Kiwanis Club of Apache Junction Citizens Advisory Committee on Cable TV - Apache Junction ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: Mr. Larry Cline, Dean of Apache Junction Center, Central Arizona College NOTE: As a rrindi_d1te to a Council Board, Commission or CorLuuiLtee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. • • • If . .einte.d to a mm , m ,7-Lp <)i-cf Revised 6/19/31 Signature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHE 0 "•ti; rri. (-) :Al.!' l'' •_.,.... • iZ3-\1? y o� � �c c unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR E.O.A.T. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: January 24, 1984 NAME: Ruth Abbott TELEPHONE: 986-1040 (home) 983-2333 (office ADDRESS: 7625 E. Emelita Ave, Mesa ZIP CODE: 85208 OCCUPATION. Escrow Officer/Branch Manager 9 „.......,r,., �i�it (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: High School. Business College, Escrow Training PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COKMUNITY ACTIVITIES. Soroptimist International of Apache Junction, MCT Women's Council of Realtors, Central Arizona escrow Associates, Arizona Escrow Association, Apache Junction Chamber, Mesa Chamber ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: John S. Granillo NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be avaiiaole to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. t n /,l� i Revised 6/19/31 'gnature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION A2IZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES t & I V 9 7i1> lT 4/ ITEM # 11 MEETING OF 3 MOTION BY: \l,tn\t/ SECONDED BY : ,4)'6-1\-12- F YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS liin COUNCILMAN DAM r f COUNC I Lf'�AN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR EIDSON ft COUNCILMAN TAYLOR Nif COUNCILMAN HILL . IAYO.R CLARKE UNAN I r"OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Inak Ilk ITEM NO . 17 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE RESIGNATIONS OF ROSS GREVES , DAVID ALEXANDER , LARRY CLINE , ROGER SHORT , BOB BEESON , JAMES TUVELL , AND ANN LORENZO , FROM THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM , BE ACCEPTED WITH SPECIAL COMMENDATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION IN ITS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ARE HEREBY APPOINTED TO THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM : LOCAL OFFICIAL CATEGORY APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT OR DESIGNEE rc(� 'Ill APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMIT EE CHAIRMAN . (TO BE DESIGNATED PRIOR TO MARCH 20 , 1984 ) PINAL COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CATEGORY SAVINGS AND LOAN NW la 1\5 ( 0 S • EDUCATORS CATEGORY CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE - APACHE JUNCTION CAMPUS Thy\ 46-Nr-ejn • APACHE JUNCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT .-f PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CATEGORY ATTORNEY . TITLE INSURANCE IfkAiliN A'1>b,-i . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CATEGORY CONTRACTOR Tim SQ411N(/ . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r 31?-6 ITEM # \C-( MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : 4,4---' , ),ES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNC I LMALMI LL ji COUNCILMAN SHANKS \.J VICE MAYOR li�- -T EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAM I ANO V LCOUNC I LMAN STEELST'LLTh i _MAYOR_ CLARKF . UNANI^SOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL �.- • ITEM NO . 18 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON MARCH 21 , 1984 , AT 7 : 00 P . M . , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO . 268 AND OTHER COUNCIL MATTERS . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES , (e)„0 ITEM 1 # l� MEETING T NG 0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED cowl! MAN LXIf1IAN0 _ r.nuNCIL� .��AJD HILL MK ILEA_TAYLOR ._C.0ll C N I LN1A1V .3HANKS .YICF MAYOR EIDSON .. STECOUNCILMAN. ELSMITR MAYOR CLARKE • UNAN I r1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL N Adak /wk. • ,01111. • .. - - v ITEM NO . 19 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON APRIL 3 , 1984 , AT 7 : 00 P . M . IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTE ON ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # d'" MEETING OF ya-e MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : 14J's Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH 4/(( COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 0000. +t^'i�E"�'°<z .� �.-�'�i`.� ,#�`'Y+�� o-w?sc�+rtY .. ....i'`_•. - ,.: �.. . ITEM NO . 20 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 2 , 1984 , AT 7 : 00 P . M . , IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 3 , 1984 , AT 6 : 00 P . M . , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . ....... ....... P,QACHF✓, O k 2^ ,, U ��. O .... z ,.._. . ,:y. q,,,zo, Vity at c94pache 09unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ ' `3 ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR ��/"` 41 PREPARED BY: I . JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: Ora PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached are copies of the Minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of February 14, 1984. Please have the original Minutes filed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk' s office. mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FEBRUARY 14, 1984 7 00 P M MINUTES -� Present Absent Guests Mr. Polomskey None Mayor Clarke Mr Rogers Councilwoman Taylor Mr Sansoni Mr Schoeph, Staff Mr. Taylor John Granillo -- Mrs Conway Jerry Burgess Mr Vehon Marty Jones Mr Sanchez, Chairman Ken Bakke Mr. McNulty, Acting Planning Director Earl Laabs Mr. Nakagawa, Acting Executive Secretary Aaron Prout Mrs Samuelson, Recording Secretary Thomas Knapp Debora Moreno ' Cheryl Bullard Kathy Wilburn Alice Polomskey Dorothy Sanchez Kyle Dugan, Press Synopsis Minutes of January 24, 1984 - approved as submitted PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219) - postponed to February 28, 1984. PZ-50-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 243) - recommended for approval. PZ-35-83 (Request for Commission Initiative) - authorized for public hearing. PZ-1-84 (Request for Commission Initiative) - not authorized for public hearing 1 Chairman after the Pledge of Allegiance was recited, IIf asked the recording secretary to call the roll. 2 Mrs Samuelson called the roll and determined that all members were present. 3. Chairman called the meeting to order and recognized the /\ presence of Mayor Clarke and Councilwoman Taylc There being no additions or deletions to the Agenda dated February 14, 1984, he called for a motion. 4. Vehon/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated February 14, 1984, be j ' accepted as presented." = The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0) - - I 5. Chairman there being no corrections, additions, or deletions to the Minutes dated January 24, 1984, he called for a motion ( 6. Vehon/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated January 24, 1984, be approved as submitted." The motion passed 6-0-1 with Mr. Polomskey voting "present " 7 Chairman asked for briefing on PZ-32-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 219 8. Mr Nakagawa stated that this case would have to be postponed due to an error in the posting of the site. Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 14, 1984 9. Chairman called for a motion 10. Polomskey/Rogers M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that case PZ-32-83 be postponed to February 28, 1984, at 7 00 p m , in these Chambers." as ',' y The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0) /mak 11. Chairman asked for staff briefing on PZ-50-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 243, a rezoning from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite by Richard and Georgia Erickson on the south side of 2nd Avenue between Hopi and Arizona Roads in Section 21 12. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case, including the administrative data 13. Chairman asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission 14 Jerry Burgess stated that he was representing the applicants and that he was in the process of buying this 11 acre site. 15. Mr. Taylor requested that he be excused from the case since he is within 300' of the subject site. He said he would abstain from voting 16. Mr. Polomskey asked if Hopi and Arizona Roads ended at the property. 17. Mr. Burgess replied that the easements are there now. 1 18 Mr Nakagawa stated that the original patent had thirty- three feet all the way around 19 Chairman noted that the property had adequate access by Arizona Road There being no one to speak { in favor or in opposition of this case, he } asked for staff recommendation. } 20. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the DCC had no objection to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the General Plan He added that they do recommend stipulating the dedication of the west, north, and east thirty-three feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes 21. Chairman closed the public hearing There being no further discussion, he called for a motion. 22 Polomskey/Rogers M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-50-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 243, application of Richard A L and Georgia A Erickson for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations or recommendations are. The applicant dedicate the west, north, and east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 14, 1984 1. The request complies with the General Plan 1 2 It is the best use of the property " The motion passed 6-0-1, with Mr Taylor abstaining 23 Chairman noted there were no Communications, Awards, or Presentations, no Requests From Other /� Agencies, and no Old Business He then asked I for staff briefing on PZ-35-83, request for a Commission Initiative by Howell and Carolyn Anderson in Section 17 24 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission stating that the application falls short of the submittal - _ requirements for signatures He said that the DCC noted that straight TH could propose a density that would not comply with the General Plan. He added that they would recommend stipulating the designation of PD zoning so { that the General Plan density would not be exceeded 25 Mr Taylor noted that the applicants had attempted to get the required signatures He asked if the Commission was going to be asked to consider a zoning not in compliance with the General Plan or if they should send it back to be in conformance 26 Chairman replied that the Commission is only being asked for an initiative for a public hearing at which time recommendations may be made to bring this into compliance 27. Mr. Vehon asked why there was a problem obtaining the signatures. 28 Mr Nakagawa replied that the application had been submitted to the Building Department about a year ago and a lot of property had changed hands 29. Mr Vehon stated that he agreed with Mr. Taylor's views on conforming to the General Plan 30. Chairman after a brief Commission discussion on the application's noncompliance to the General Plan, he reminded the Commission that this was only a request for an initiative for a public hearing. He then called for a motion. • 31 Sansoni/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that pursuant to Section 2802 of the Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing for a Commission Initiated zone change from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) as requested by Howell and Carolyn Anderson in case number PZ-35-83 for their property described as The North l of the Southeast i} and the South } of the Northeast * of the Southwest 3 of the Northwest } of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal f4 County, Arizona; is hereby authorized "Stipulations are Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 14, 1984 The applicant submit the required zoning - materials "The reason for this authorization is: The applicant has already tried the other process and this would be the appropriate thing to allow a chance for a public hearing " The motion passed 5-2-0, with Mr Vehon and �\ Mrs. Conway dissenting. 32. Chairman asked for staff briefing on PZ-1-84, 1 a request for a Commission Initiative by Ken Bakke and Mike Purcell in Section 29 33 Mr Nakagawa stated that this is a request to rezone from GR to TH/PD on a 15-acre parcel for a 150-lot travel trailer resort 34 Chairman there being no questions or discussion, he called I for a motion. ! 35. Taylor/Sansone M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that pursuant to Section 2802 of the Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing for a Commission Initated zone change from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite by Planned Development (TH/PD), as requested by Ken Bakke and Mike Purcell in case number PZ-1-84, for their property described as. The Southeast ; of the Northeast of the Northwest * and the South 1 of the Southwest of the Northeast * of the Northwest * of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Arizona, is hereby not authorized "The reasons for not authorizing this are It has been the policy of the City of Apache • Junction for the past many years that of the two methods of applying for a rezoning, the Commission Initiative has been used primarily for technical changes or when exceptional circumstances occur or in a case of which we just had before us, they have made an attempt I feel that we're operating under the City Ordinance at the present time, which may be changed and probably will be in the near future, but we're still operating under them, and the Commission Initiative is a circumvention of the signature rights of the neighboring property owners which really deprives them of the notification process Although I realize we send the letters out at the time of the hearing, many people have told me that the didn't know about the rezoning until 7 to 8 days before it was happening and they didn't have time to look into it or make their feelings known " The motion passed 4-3, with Mr Polomskey, Mr. Vehon, and Mr Sanchez dissenting 36 Mr Nakagawa requested that the applicant be allowed to speak to the Commission 37. Chairman stated that the request was not an Agenda item and would be in violation of the Open Meeting Law Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 14, 1984 � , He noted that the applicant could address the Commission under Call to the Public f. which was now open. 38 Marty Jones commented that he was very surprised that no one can speak prior to a vote on a Commission Initiative. He stated that in as a. j the future, the Commission should reconsider .. giving the applicant the opportunity to speak since they could make a better decision `! if they heard the reasons for the request. . He added that they were required by law to give the applicant a public hearing and that they have violated the State Statutes by not granting the public hearing He stated that his applicant would try to get the signatures - and informed the Commission on the "fiasco" last time when they tried to obtain signatures. 39. Chairman stated that the Commission had been over this with the City Attorney. He added that the door is not closed since now the applicant can just submit a letter to Planning requesting a hearing 40 Mr Vehon asked what counties or cities require signature petitions 41 Mr Jones replied that only counties require them and mentioned all the cities he had been involved 1 with who do not use this process and stated they cannot legally use it 42. Mr. Rogers commented that if it is a State law to grant a public hearing, the Commission should not ` even vote on it 43 Chairman stated that the City has a petition process and that they can grant a Commission Initiative if the signatures cannot be obtained. He stated that there is a work session scheduled for this item on February 23rd and invited Mr Jones to be there ^ He then asked if anyone else wished to speak under Call to the Public, there was no one. He noted there were no Information or Reports He called for a motion to adjourn i 1 44 Mr. Rogers asked that PZ-1-84 be reopened for discussion { and vote 7 45 Mrs Samuelson since there was no Robert's Rules of Order present at the meeting and since Mr Nakagawa could find no procedure outlined in the Commission's Handbook for recalling a motion; she noted that when a similar request was made at a past Board of Adjustment meeting and the 1.._ Executive Secretary checked the rules, the procedure followed at that time was that a motion could be made by a member of the prevailing vote to recall the motion, but it had to be seconded by a member also of the prevailing vote 46 Mr Rogers requested a second for his recall motion The motion died due to the lack of a proper second Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 14, 1984 47. Chairman again called for a motion to adjourn 4 48 Conway/Taylor M/S "to adjourn." The meeting adjourned at 8:01 p.m. Recorded and Transcribed by `', Ace,y- ,o/�<.��c�.--. , Marge Sadiuelson Recording Secretary Respectfully Submitted, - -.-z-.--,----.-...T.7- r-- alteo"-9__// / '/-44------- James A Nakagawa, Acti/xective Secretary APPROVED Ken'Sanc ez, Chairman C t „.... 1 1. 7 ,. rACHE✓t.. °c. 2ns DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY � O U ,.. ,.� jF Z gRIZONP C 'ity o &47Iacf2e unction W E McDANIEL Director 'amok March 8, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of is Safety V16. 1. THROUGH: City Manager 7 SUBJECT: Departmental Report February 1984 Attached you will find the Departmental Report for February 1984. Injury accidents for the month of February increased 23% over January with non- injury and private property accidents showing little change from the pre- vious month. Reported index crimes all increased in February with burglary leading the way with a 39% increase in actual offenses. All other index crimes increased only slightly over the previous month. Animal Control Activity as Follows: Impound Fees 99.00 License Fees 465.00 Rabies Fees 87.50 Total Fee for February $651.50 Total 1984 $2942.00 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 Auk Impounded Adopted Dogs 79 19 Cats 30 9 Destroyed In Pound At End Of Month Dogs 35 13 Amok Cats 18 2 Reclaimed Transferred To County Dogs 19 0 Cats 1 0 Dog Licenses Sold To Date 1984 Licenses: 467 Kennel Permits Sold To Date 1984 Kennel Permits: 2 Donations Dog and cat food Citations Issued Dog Running At Large: 0 Unlicensed Dog: 0 Complaints Alm February: 105 1984: 223 Impounded and adopted 1 peacock. DEPARTMENTAL ACTIVITY JAN ( FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT AiDEC TOTAL ACCIDENTS* * 961 Accident-No Injury 962 Accident-Injury 961 23 22 13 963 Accident-Fatality S 4 9 AL 1 0 1 P Persons Injured or Killed PP 15 17 32 S Speed Related 962 13 16 29 AL Alcohol Related P 17 22 40 PP Private Property S 4 5 9 AL 0 2 2 963 1 0 1 P 1 0 1 S 0 0 0 ( AL 0 0 0 TRAFFIC CITATIONS SPEED 42 41 83 ALCOHOL 8 11 19 WARNINGS 100 225 325 OTHER 165 215 380 INDEX CRIMES MURDER 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 ROBBERY 0 0 0 BRUGLARY 13 18 31 AG. ASSAULT 3 4 7 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 0 0 0 LARCENY 44 46 90 ARSON 0 0 0 COMPLAINTS TAKEN 633 657 1290 C.R T. HITS FELONY 6 2 8 MISDEMEANOR 10 10 20 t 'ti . a J I i • '" • • tir CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) Action completed. THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 238, PZ-45-83, APPLI- CATION BY BELLUCCl/RAGAN TO REZONE 0. 5 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF BROADWAY AND HIGHWAY 60 IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, TO INCLUDE THAT THE APPLICANT DEDICATE THE SOUTH FIFTY (50° ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES, B: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 240, PZ-48-83, APPLICATION BY CLYDE AND ELLEANOR WYATT TO REZONE 2.5 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 60 AND COLT ROAD IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, TO INCLUDE ( 1 ) THE APPLICANT DEDICATE THE WEST THIRTY-THREE (33 ' ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES. (2) THE APPLICANT BE REQUIRED TO DO OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS SIDEWALKS, CURBS, AND GUTTERS DUE TO THE DOGLEG ON SOUTH COLT ROAD, AND C: ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTE Ord. 238, 240, posted 3/9/84 FROM REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1984, BE ANI Published 3/15 - 3/21/84. HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. C.C. (motion carried. ) 'lanning Letters sent and Quit Claim sent for recording 3/8/84. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 265, BE READ BY TITLE ONL WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THg ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) Action completed. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 265, AN ORDINANCE OF MAYOR ANI CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING ORDINANCES NUMBEREI 188, 199, 225, 226 , 230 AND 237; REPEALING AN CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; PROVIDING FOR SEVERA BILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREB Posted 3/9/84. IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. (motion carried. ) C.C. Published 3/15 - 3/21/84. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 266, BE READ BY TITLE ONL WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING .OF TH1 ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) Action completed. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT ORDINANCE NO. 266, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 3 ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM, PERTAINING TO PAID HOLIDAYS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES; REPEALING ANY CON- FLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS Personnel APPROVED AND ADOPTED. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 3/9/84. Published 3/15 - 3/21/84. THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT BY HARRY BIDWELL FOR A REDUCTION TO 16.5 FEET IN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TRAILER UNITS AND FOR A RE- DUCTION TO ZERO FEET IN THE SETBACK DISTANCE TO SPACE LINES FOR ROADHAVEN PHASES I AND II (PZ-6-81 AND PZ-19-82) BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED. (motion carried. ) Planning Letter sent to applicant 3/7/84. Reconsideration meeting for 3/10/84. THAT NO RECOMMENDATION BE MADE ON THE APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY MR . HOWARD KELLER AGENT FOR THE CACTUS CLUB, DUE TO THE PENDING LITIGATION. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 232, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) C.C. Letters sent 3/9/84. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 232, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-43-83 FROM C-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD) ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND C.C. Posted 3/9/84. PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED Published 3/15 - 3/21/84. AND ADOPTED. (motion carried. ) Planning Letter sent to applicant 3/7/84. THAT THE CITY MANAGER IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO INITIATE COORDINATION WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF DOWDEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , IN ORDER TO PREPARE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF A CABLE TELEVISION LICENSE ENABLING ORDINANCE. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CABLE TELEVISION BE DISCONTINUED, AS Letter sent to applicant anc THEIR CHARGES HAVE BEEN FULFILLED. P.W.(motion carried. ) C.M. letter of thanks sent to Committee. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PINAL COUNTY, TO PROVIDE SERVICES AND SUPPLIES NECESSARY FOR THE MAY 15, 1984, SPECIAL ELECTION, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000.00, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. (motion carried. ) C.C. Agreement sent to Pinal County. THAT THE LEASE PURCHASE OF A W20C WHEEL LOADER FROM CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT, STATE OF ARIZONA BID NUMBER A4-00249, IN THE AMOUNT OF $43,373.00, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. (motion carried. ) P.W. Coordinating with Leasing Institution. THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MARCH 20, 1984, AT 6:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. (motion carried. ) - C.C. Posted 3/14/84. THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:00 P.M. (motion carried. ) Action completed. p r► • • , • • ' . • j.. ITEM NO . 22 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED ATG(se-,), P .M . Vil:./. ROLL 'CALL P) ,3/11) ROLL CALL IP ESENT 1 ABSENT f Oink C MAY O RaARKEir,:;. ' v// I WO. , VICE-MAYOR EIDSON / / 1 . //, / 1COUNCILMAN HILLv // 1 ' COUNCILMAN TAYLOR , . , COUNCILMAN SHANKS17/ V/ , ' COUNCILMAN s 1 ELLsr1ITf1 iiii i/i/ : COUNCILMAN DAMIANOii TOTAL f \ , I STAFF PRESENT W.S. /"� /R - CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly / 1, FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis * / 7 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING \ 01 V/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel 1/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman . • V- . CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander. *Pa ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoe h (/ tr . P N _ p ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES /51 ITEM #_ MEETING O ;/.1,v MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 116-014 Y NO ABSTAINED VICE_ MAYOR FTT)SON COUNCILMAN, STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN TAYLOR /` COUNCILMAN bill L COUNCILMAN SHANKS .COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE UNAN !IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL Vil:./. ROLL 'CALL P) ,3/11) ROLL CALL IP ESENT 1 ABSENT f Oink C MAY O RaARKEir,:;. ' v// I WO. , VICE-MAYOR EIDSON / / 1 . //, / 1COUNCILMAN HILLv // 1 ' COUNCILMAN TAYLOR , . , COUNCILMAN SHANKS17/ V/ , ' COUNCILMAN s 1 ELLsr1ITf1 iiii i/i/ : COUNCILMAN DAMIANOii TOTAL f \ , I STAFF PRESENT W.S. /"� /R - CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly / 1, FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis * / 7 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING \ 01 V/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel 1/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman . • V- . CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander. *Pa ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoe h (/ tr . P N _ r CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK Ot A SU'K DATE: 312d) V� NAME: OAP ADDRESS: a\0 �., OOS�Ir� AGENDA ITEM: IZ /11b. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK 4k NAME: ( { DATE : 2-0 AL ADDRESS: � A D AGENDA ITEM: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION EQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: DATE: /0-ofs'r\ ADD S: . j4 o-a eL40 • AGENDA ITEM: 7 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 4%: 6;C : DATE: ADDRESS: //S $ ca/G ,� -d AGENDA ITEM: j,P7I rem C7Ove ��,��e 1 orld' a CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: /M A DA/ ! go,G!,`r" DATE: ...5 ^eZ a-- 4/ ADDRESS: /J 675 44.4//-5 A)4,- 14 el, 1Y AGENDA ITEM: e'i / 0"?)/'-- 33 r /e w CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: Id/ / 274.,€��L�LC'/L DATE: (.L// 6 (/ 4 �'�/ ADDRESS: g 0 0 f C l 6 4. l �.5� 0 AGENDA ITEM: VV j7(,,,tAn. AA 14 ///„ p, ,P3 °j A `bJJ-a.t 0A. I (WI C16 o . ' ° I"'7 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: Ls 1 A"S DATE'`a, ADDRESS: c53ro F. P7 r AUE A `1 AGENDA ITEM: th4j l! — 1.2 •-�� '� 70