Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 04.03 City Council Regular Agenda PQp,CHF ✓ Ug Z '1Riz,, c ity 4 C94pac�ie unction CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 0.... AGENDA APRIL 3, 1984 7:00 P.M. 6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (if required) 6: 00 P.M. WORK SESSION (if required) CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Proposed Ordinance No. 239, PZ-46-83, Application by Arthur W. Mohr to rezone 1. 25 acre parcel, located on north side of West Broadway Avenue, 165 feet east of South Delaware Drive in Section 19, from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone. B. Proposed Ordinance No. 242, PZ-49-83, Application by John and Alice Kile to rezone 0. 75 acre parcel, located on north side of Greasewood Street, 100 feet east of Grand Drive in Section 18 from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . C. Proposed Ordinance No. 248, PZ-54-83, Application by William J. and Ena C. MacKenzie to rezone 1 . 25 acre parcel, located at west side of North Gold Drive, 165 feet south of West Tepee Street in Section 17 from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite (TH) . D. Proposed Ordinance No. 249, PZ-55-83, Application by Eldon H. Unger and Carmen F. Unger to rezone 10, 200 square foot parcel , located on northwest corner of West Ohio Street and North Lawther Drive in Section 19 from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 E. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of March 9, 1984 F. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of March 21 , 1984 G. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of March 20, 1984 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED GUESTS AND VISITORS AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 254, PZ-2-84, Application by Donna L. and Robert L. Loewenstein to rezone 17, 000 and 15,000 square foot parcels , located on east side of Ironwood Drive, 200 feet and 600 feet south of Apache Trail in Section 20, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. (First Reading) (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 256, PZ-3-84, Application by Daniel Rafferty through Mike Kovacs to rezone 2. 9 acre parcel, located on north side of Highway 88 and on south side of Lost Dutchman Boulevard in Section 15, from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. (First Reading) (5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 257, PZ-4-84, Application by Kenneth Ragan, Steven Stagnaro, and Norman Thompson to rezone 7. 78 acre parcel, located on north side of Southern Avenue between Acacia and Starr Roads in Section 27, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. (First Reading) (6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 259, PZ-6-84, Application by Jerry Burgess to rezone 2. 5 acre parcel, located on northwest corner of Tepee Street and Desert View Drive in Section 18, from Gr General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) (7) RECONSIDERATION FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR ROADHAVEN PHASE I AND II (Continued Item) (8) PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR ONE-TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS, PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-14 (Street Improvement Bonds) Recess Regular Meeting Convene Special Meeting SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA (1) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-13, ONE-TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE (2) ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL MEETING Reconvene Regular Meeting p OLD BUSINESS (9) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219, PZ-32-83, Application by Randall Industries to rezone 10 acre parcel, located at northwest corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in Section 28, from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development. (Second Reading) AMk (10) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 269, REVISING SECTION 304. (a) , BUILDING PERMIT FEES (Second Reading) NEW BUSINESS (11) DESIGNATION OF BOND ADVISOR (12) APPOINTMENTS TO CITY BOARD OF HEALTH (13) APPROVAL OF SWIMMING POOL FEES (14) APPOINTMENTS TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION (15) WORK SESSION, APRIL 16, 1984 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, APRIL 17, 1984 CALL TO THE PUBLIC (16) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (17) ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS." ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / • ITEM # MEETING MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED ` M! COU I� ANO 1 A 0 MSC I MOLE LL COLINC LL1Ati_TAYLOR _COLINC I I MAN _SHANKS . YJF MAYOR EIDSON _COUNCILMAN_ STFFI SMITH V MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL . ,,..: t}.,.°•-K �c � �fi a,rs-.t�.-! �s"�;ems. ITEM NO . 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . hook olok <( QAC 6 O 3 y n,A O t l ,, Z �� ar,:. gR/ZONN V ity on (Apache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 Approver for Agenda /E Date, Item # First Reading 3,r c1 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading ULlt., AR 1 Public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ : Old Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR New Business PREPARED BY: 11 JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER _._Z8onsent Agenda ,4, SUBJECT: 1111, REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-46-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 239) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-46-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 239, is a request by the applicant Arthur W. Mohr to rezone his property from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone. The site is a vacant 1 .25 acre parcel located on the north side of West Broadway Avenue, 165 feet east of South Delaware Drive in Section 19. It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile homes, and a business. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 22 Number of Exempt Properties 3 Number of Affected Owners 19 Number of Signatures 12=63.2% Signatures by Affected Area 69.5% Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Local Commercial Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 /Mk IOW The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-46-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 239) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Sansoni/Polomskey 6-1 -0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-46-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 239, application of Arthur W. Mohr for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Commercial Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the south fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . The request is consistent with the Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. 2. Based on the applicant' s previous buildings that have been seen, he builds good looking structures." Recommended Motion ,� See attached. JAN:mas ORDINANCE NO. 239 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, i PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-46-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL ttt The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: The East ' of the Southwest ; of the Southwest ; of the Southwest 1 of the Southeast 1 of Section 19, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, } located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS I f { All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, -2*o-A are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for fany reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the { validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000 00 or imprisonment for • a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 ,. Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av ex Cit Attorney , ..m. PZ-46-83 4 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 239 PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR-GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ofookk • V VX, SUBJECT SITE 46 57 I _ .r— 0_ 1 (2) 062 I 1 I et 0 56 c 3E 1 1 I CR-5 PD I a 8 , 28 -35 ,-:1r 0:10 116® I CB ca N 31 ( 32 ; (16 51 e I CB-11 1 CB-1 I 59 ®i '--- 1 1.----� _ - W. BROADWAY AVE. I--- -- --- --- - --I 1 1 i I TH ✓'� 1 1 cc 1 al — 1 28 ce 151 152 I a — I I a I 1 w 4 av_ -4 -. ;.X s a W' _..;-' * I I rl I I u, O - COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 101-10- ❑ - COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-13- N SCALE. "=200' Q - COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 101-07- O - COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-15- 1- j - LIMITS OF ZONNING - REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 239 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-46-83 , application of Arthur W Mohr ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 239 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-46-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL COMMERCIAL ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES: BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. The applicant dedicate the south fifty (50') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) ACHE✓GOii:3-) � U � O 'IPIZONP `0it y oly c94pache c&unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 v�Approver for Agenda 4.--C_ Date Item # First Readirg 3 ' -- -- MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading 1/ 3 �� Public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ � � ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR ' Old Business New Business PREPARED BY: ';;JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER `-'^Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-49-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 242) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-49-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 242, is a request by the applicants John and Alice Kile to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a developed 0.75 acre parcel located on the north side of Greasewood Street, 100 feet east of Grand Drive in Section 18. It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes and houses. Other Information and Application Requirements On January 24, 1984, the Planning and Zoning Commission authorized a Commission Initiative. Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objection to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-49-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 242) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Conway 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-49-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 242, application of John and Alice Kile for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the south thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: The request substantially complies with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas ORDINANCE NO. 242 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING _ ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-49-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. ` 4 ` ` " 0.6 "$" BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, T\ - ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The west 100 feet of the east 200 feet of the West ; of the South } of the Northeast } of the Southwest I< of the Southeast i of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, i be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the . - stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south thirty-three (33') �:- feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions "''F � •-- of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, I are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY i If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof 1 SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE ,ram ! Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate ,z .:-;tc; offense punishable as hereinabove described. _ PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke - Mayor ATTEST L Kathleen Connelly City Clerk - APPROVED AS TO FORM iT- D vi F. Alex City P�ttorney Oak "mak - PZ-49-83 PROPOSED ORDINA10E MO. 242 PROPOSED REZONING FROM CR—GENERAL RURAL TO TH—TRAILER HOMESITE .3 is -, W. SHIPROCK ST. 115 `ti , E4 ,I ® 13 0 rel. I TH I 0 1 1 TH F L I 1 1C 0 A 0 1� 0 e —1 38 I 1 0 rf1 6 0 ® :CD 1 W. ROUNDUP ST, 24 B ® fa I® 1 1 I CR-5 ND ® ® 1 I 1 25 G6 37 A 26 27 26 26 26 37 26 A E 0 BD > 030 • }' - w . 16 cc a 4 Aillirre u, a a z WI;..- 14 35 Q w 33 r 6 0 A U' - cn Z Z __911_ oEMIL Q z 10 W. SUPERSTITION BLVD. OCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-35- N SCALE. 1"=300' SUBJECT SITE Ae r-' LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) p RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 242 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-49-83 , application of John and Alice Kile ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 242 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-49-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL ` The applicant dedicate the south thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) ez ( cHi) 1'n� jg 2_ ..z ' ` VD2t o '1Pizo (*ache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 Approver for Agenda te' Item # First Reading 7 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading e,eJ %/Public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ , Old Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR ( New Business Consent Agenda PREPARED BY:,' , JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ✓ /i SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-54-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 248) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-54-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 248, is a request by the applicants William J. and Ena C. MacKenzie to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH). The site is a vacant 1 .25 acre parcel located on the west side of North Gold Drive, 165 feet south of West Tepee Street in Section 17. It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 14 Number of Exempt Properties 2 Number of Affected Owners 12 Number of Signatures 9=75% Signatures by Affected Area 85%± Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-54-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 248) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Conway/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-54-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 248, application of William J. and Ena C. MacKenzie for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: The request is consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site." Recommended Motion See attached. .-.. JAN:mas ORDINANCE NO 248 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-54-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. - �k SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: The south 167.62 feet of the east 334 92 feet of the North i of the Northwest of the Northwest of the Southwest of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, EXCEPT the south five (5') feet thereof, located in Apache Junction, - - Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this [ Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000.00 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk • APPROVED AS TO FORM D vi lex n r City ttorney/ Am\ Amk. PZ-54-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 248 PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) . r SUBJECT SITE 4 • :---- --,7t.,;---.2,--#.,:--..- --..-..:-...7..,--;-,-_--,--,--_- - SCALE: 1"=300' WEST FOOTHILL STREET ..s...,. 1 7B 8 - GR G R I_ .. E - 1 _ 1 1 1 - - _ - _, . i 1 W. SMOKETREE ST. 1 le E 1 e 1 1 TH 1 I .. .,_ I E , a :0 0 co G R i i 1 WEST TEPEE STREET 0 T H 8 ' A ® GR .,.. cc c) ICD §i., ,6,G 6H Am. 0 if) 6 F).... 6 J i c) 0 0 c=1 6B c.• 6C 6D E - c_v W. SHIc)ROK e AAAAAAAA = STREET -",,•1-=-4...4.- -ac-7.-------a- -*.-51 .-.-5.---'7.-...z-i 0 . ci—IC) TH i GR 8 G G iCD ( . GR ..1/41.,_ ...._ 0 100 . --0- -0-66' WEST ROUNDUP STREET N 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-30- 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-29- ! COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-35- 0 00UNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 100-32- Oak Adak ..z RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 248 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-54-83 application of William J and Ena C. MacKensie ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 248 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-54-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, • PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) PQACHF do O 1 1'O� U ,f i O z "IP.4'-'11.-7:Y /zONP cQitf 4 C4pache cOunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 29, 1984 Approver for Agenda �L�, Date Item fi MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading `�' 6 Second Reading 1 0 . THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ 1 Public Hearing ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR , / Old Business New Business PREPARED BY: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Agenda SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-55-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 249) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-55-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 249, is a request by the applicants Eldon H. Unger and Carmen F. Unger to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone. The site is a developed 10,200 square foot parcel located on the northwest corner of West Ohio Street and North Lawther Drive in Section 19. It is designated Medium/ High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding uses include mobile homes, houses, and vacant land. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 23 Number of Exempt Properties 23 Number of Affected Owners 0 Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 �. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-55-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 249) February 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the �-► following motion: (M/S Vehon/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-55-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 249, application of Eldon H. and Carmen F. Unger for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "The reasons for the recommendation are. This lot would conform with the existing densities according to the General Plan in the area and would also be compatible with the existing development in the area." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas i. ORDINANCE NO 249 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-55-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The South 111 feet of Lot 57, Cayton Subdivision in Section 19, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT for the East fifteen (15') feet thereof; • be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone `�- SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. crN7IvilS)j/ vi e ande City Attorney Amok Awk PZ-55-83 k PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 249 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE -. __ W. SUPERSTITION BLVD. j• C6 . 77 73 —_CB-2 kill -- 74 1 19 (31 ,31 :1411E11 ------CD-- _ ' c j O87 84 G( 76B Z �I-- 1 , c TH RSA :Am ��� oLCR..4 -- ___ --j 85B %/� _ Loillinkli 0 14 W. OHIO ST. z-------------- 50 69 53 52O 51 O 65 _ ci) 66A 49 0 --------------- �^ 71 48 47 - 11 ------ a a ® 6 46 „oft.,4 4 ® -4 - is i ® 6 � i i ______C) L__.1 _ W. VIRGINIA ST, o IIIINIM r ss 62 j 59 42 141 40 39 rMp a 1 O I O TH j O �J'3 ® ® ® 0 1 3s W. TUFA ST. I. a SUBJECT SITE SCALE: 1" = 200' N O COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 101-03- L . LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER - GR) AIN Am. RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 249 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, INPZ-55-83 application of Eldon H. .•:�:. _ THAT ZONING CASE and Carmen F Unger Amok, J ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 249 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING - ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-55-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES -wP-hcs�•.h .,ti.�.-,`�t�T," '.,�;_'. la�ti.�ate;, a "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) Ask AIN. t CITY COUNCIL MEETING SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 9, 1984 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, A~` 1 Arizona, was held on March 9, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. Il CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 3 00 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Councilmen Absent: Councilman Hill, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Steelsmith Staff Present. City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori V. Clark ( Others Present Leo S. Coombs It Charles Harrison Gino Terwilliger Mayor Clarke made the following statement: "The Council has been checking into allegations about the Apache Junction Magistrate's Office for a year or more. We chose not to comment to the ;/\ press because we needed to be sure of our findings. It has become quite clear to me that the citizens of this community believe they cannot expect fair and impartial justice from the Magistrate's Court. Many complaints have been voiced with very little, if any, facts to help us. The credibility of the Council and the Department of Public Safety is being questioned. ir", ``' - �- 'i h On Wednesday, March 7th, two council members and myself met with Judge Leo Coombs. It was suggested that he consider resigning at an early date. His answer was a definite "no" and a threat of suit I have come to the conclusion that Judge Leo Coombs can no longer effectively serve this council and the community. Action must be undertaken to assure everyone that we do listen and we are concerned His personal relationship with the Council, his threats of suits against the city, cannot and will not be tolerated." Amok Mayor Clarke read Chapter 5, Article 5-2-1, from the City Code as follows "The presiding officer of the magistrate court shall be the city magistrate, who shall be appointed by and shall serve at the pleasure of the council." Councilman Damiano stated that the many allegations against the judge are hearsay, directed by a person with a grudge, and wished to have said allegations investigated prior to any Council action. 'O\ Councilman Shanks stated that "a man is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law, and the Council is not a court of law." Vice Mayor Eidson expressed his opinion that Judge Coombs has done a good job, but as these allegations and statements made by the Judge, are causing problems for the Police Department, City Council, and affecting the efficiency of the Magistrate Court, and it is necessary for the Council to take action as it is not possible to rectify the situation. Mayor Clarke MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE SERVICES OF LEO S. COOMBS AS MAGISTRATE OF THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, BE TERMINATED EFFECTIVE AT 5 00 P.M., MARCH 9, 1984. Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion Vice Mayor Eidson asked if vacation pay and benefits will be paid Judge Coombs Mayor Clarke stated that all benefits due to Mr. Coombs, will be forthcoming. Vice Mayor Eidson asked if there is any severance pay for this position. Mayor Clarke stated that there is not Councilman Damiano again stated that the allegations would have to be fully investigated before he could agree with the proposed Council action. VOTE: In Favor: Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Opposed Councilman Damiano, Councilman Shanks The motion failed. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT "� " ` `r '~ RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 3.17 P.M. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 9, 1984 PAGE 2 ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk • SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 9, 1984 PAGE 3 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 21, 1984 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on March 21, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Hill, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Councilman Absent Councilman Taylor Staff Present: City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel City Attorney David Alexander ORDINANCE NO. 2 8 PROPOSED 6 , AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CITY CODE, MAGISTRATE COURT (Second Reading) ) Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 268, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. /u"\ Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE: In Favor. Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Hill Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Opposed: Councilman Damiano '1,:. `'4 "`"'v"-,,,-ff--z -"'`N The motion failed. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 268 in it's entirety. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 268, AN ORDINANCE OF MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE CHAPTER 5 MAGISTRATE COURT, ARTICLE 5-2 PRESIDING OFFICER, SECTION 5-2-1 CITY MAGISTRATE AND SECTION 5-2-2 ACTING CITY MAGISTRATE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY Air BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, 1 ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That Chapter 5 MAGISTRATE COURT, Article 5-2 PRESIDING OFFICER, Section 5-2-1 City Magistrate and Section 5-2-2 Acting City Magistrate, be amended to read as follows Section 5-2-1 City Magistrate The presiding officer of the Magistrate Court shall be the City Magistrate who shall be appointed by the City Council for a term of two (2) years commencing on May 1st of every even-numbered year ending on April 30th of every even-numbered year, unless sooner removed for misfeasance, malfeasance or non-feasance of office. Section 5-2-2 Assistant City Magistrate In the absence of the City Magistrate, the presiding officer of the Magistrate Court shall be the Assistant City Magistrate. The Assistant City Magistrate shall be appointed by the City Council for a term of two (2) years commencing on May 1st of every even-numbered year and ending on April 30th of every even-numbered year, unless sooner removed for misfeasance, malfeasance or non-feasance of office. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 268, AN ORDINANCE OF MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE CHAPTER 5 MAGISTRATE COURT, ARTICLE 5-2 PRESIDING OFFICER, SECTION 5-2-1 CITY MAGISTRATE AND SECTION 5-2-2 ACTING CITY MAGISTRATE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION REGARDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY MAGISTRATE POSITION City Manager Michael J. McNulty asked for direction. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 21, 1984 PAGE 2 Amok - Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PREPARE ADVERTISEMENTS FOR THE CITY MAGISTRATE POSITION Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the ^' motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. APPROVAL OF STATE LAND APPRAISAL ) City Manager McNulty explained that the City Complex is located on State land, which has been appraised at $20,000.00 per acre, which if appealed would take a lengthy procedure, and if accepted will be put up for bid to anyone Mr McNulty also stated that governmental agencies have priority, so if another agency bids for the land, they would be required to reimburse the City for all capital improvements Councilman Hill expressed his feeling that if the City waits to bid on the land, it will be more expensive in the future Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT t _ RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE STATE LAND APPRAISED FOR THE 20 ACRE CITY COMPLEX SITE BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried DETERMINATION OF BOND ADVISOR FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS Mr McNulty stated that if the Am Council accepts the resolution to submit to the voters a proposition for street improvement (gas tax) bonds, it will be necessary to contact bond advisors for presentations for the Council Work Session of April 2, 1984. Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY MANAGER IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO CONTACT BOND ADVISORS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING PRESENTATIONS ON STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE APRIL 2, 1984, WORK SESSION. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried ADJOURNMENT Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 7:17 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 21, 1984 PAGE 3 Councilman Hill seconded the motion. 4 VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR /r, AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST • . - " [ Kathleen Connelly City Clerk c SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 21, 1984 PAGE 4 % CITY COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MEETING MARCH 20, 1984 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on March 20, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Vice Mayor Eidson led the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano, ( Councilman Taylor, Councilman Hill, Vice Mayor Edison, Il Mayor Clarke Staff Present: City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Public Works Rich Broman Controller Keith Lewis Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark Others Present: Mr. George Baljo �.� ;: ;:.,.: 1070 E. Navajo Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Marty Jones, Attorney 2333 N. Central Phoenix, Arizona Mr. Ed Gorny Mr. John Dassinger 1544 S. Stetson Rd. Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Aaron Felt 1355 S. Idaho Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. S.J. Steinmiller 8001 E. Broadway Mesa, Arizona f616k Mr. Earl Laabs 370 E. 12th Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Glen McMinn Mr Gary Steinhoff 1285 S. Idaho Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Tom C. Knapp 1351 S. Idaho Rd Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. W.J. MacKenzie 1321 W Rawhide Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Joe Morvak 5990 E Roosevelt -' -� Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA ) Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE DELETING OF ITEM NO. 9, WHICH SHALL BE ADDRESSED AT THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ) Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 243, PZ-50-83, APPLICATION BY RICHARD A. AND GEORGIA ERICKSON TO REZONE 1.5 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH SIDE OF EAST SECOND AVENUE BETWEEN HOPI AND ARIZONA ROADS IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), INCLUDING THE APPLICANT DEDICATING THE WEST, NORTH, AND EAST THIRTY-THREE (33') FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES, B ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1984, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 2 i. ,.. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried Introduction of Distinguished Guests and Visitors Mayor Clarke recognized State Representative Roy Hudson, and Mr. and Mrs. McLaine, Mrs Clarke's brother and sister-in-law. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS None. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 83-63, GP-2-83, BALJO ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa, briefed the Council on the application by Mr George Baljo for a General Plan amendment to designate for "Conventional Housing Only" an area in Palm Springs Subdivision bounded approximately by South Winchester Road, East Southern Avenue, South Mariposa Road, East Navajo Avenue, South Royal Palm Road, and East Hondo Avenue. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Development Coordinating Committee have no objections to the petition. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 83-63, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION: 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN," ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO 82-01, ON JULY 20, 1984, AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 82-48 ON JULY 20, 1984, AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED, "APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP," SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED "REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1983," BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 3 ... Vice Mayor Eidson asked if this would be done in every subdivision in the City. At Mr. Nakagawa stated that the concern would be with undeveloped areas rather than already developed subdivisions Vice Mayor Eidson asked how this would affect Palm Springs. Mr. Nakagawa explained that this would restrict rezonings on the undeveloped lots within the subdivision. Vice Mayor Eidson wished to know if this would be a liability to the City. City Attorney David Alexander stated that if the City failed to detect this problem, a court order could be issued directing the City to enforce their laws, but there would be no liability. Mr. George Baljo, the applicant, further explained the purpose of this petition. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 219, PZ-32-83 RANDALL INDUSTRIES (First Reading ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the rezoning application from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple ( Residence by Planned Development, a 10 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in Section 28, and stated that there have been two protest petitions submitted. Mr Marty Jones, Attorney, 2333 N. Central, Phoenix, representing Randall Industries gave a presentation on the proposed project. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition of the petition. Mr. Ed Gorny, addressed the Council in favor of the proposal. Mr. John Dassinger, 1544 S. Stetson Road, Apache Junction, a property owner in the proposed project area, expressed his opposition. Mr. Aaron Felt, 1355 S. Idaho, Apache Junction, a property owner on the northwest corner of the proposed project, expressed his opposition. Mr. S. J. Steinmiller, 8001 E. Broadway, Mesa, property owner in the area, addressed the Council in protest of the rezoning. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Earl Laabs, 370 E. 12th Avenue, Apache Junction, stated that the Council had previously chosen to designate this area low density, and that the proposed change would mean over a 300% increase in population per acre, further pointing out reasons for denial of the rezoning application. Mr Glen McMinn, spoke in opposition to the proposal '- Mr Gary Steinhoff, 1285 S. Idaho, Apache Junction expressed his opinion in opposition to the application. Mr Tom C Knapp, 1351 S. Idaho Rd., Apache Junction, addressed his opposition to the proposal. Mr. Jones gave a rebuttal to the protest arguments. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval on condition that the development meet Fire Department and City Engineer requirements. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 219, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 219, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING ( THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE tt PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting at PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 239, PZ-46-83, MOHR (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone of a 1.25 acre parcel located on the north side of West Broadway Avenue, 165 feet east of South Delaware Drive in Section 19. Mr. Arthur Mohr asked if there were any questions from the Council Councilman Damian() wished to know the proposed use. Mr. Mohr stated that he wished to place a water dispenser on the property. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 5 Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Development Coordinating Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission both recommend approval of the rezoning application, with pertinent stipulations. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 239, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 239, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-46-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 242, PZ-49-83 KILE (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH). Ms Alice Kile, 2650 W. Superstition, Apache Junction, requested approval of the rezoning request. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. ^, Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Development Coordinating Committee have no objections to the rezoning application. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 242, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO 242, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-49-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 6 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 248, PZ-54-83 MACKENZIE (First Reading) ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the rezoning application from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite (TH), �"► located on the west side of North Gold Drive, 165 feet south of West Tepee Street in Section 17, and stated that the parcel is surrounded by mobile homes. Mr W J MacKenzie, 1321 W. Rawhide, Apache Junction, requested approval of the rezoning. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr Nakagawa stated that the Development Coordinating Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission have no objections to the rezoning application. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 248, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 248, AN ORDINANCE OF ( THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-54-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 249, PZ-55-83 ^4, UNGER (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the rezoning request from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence Zone, located on the northwest corner of West Ohio Street and North Lawther Drive in Section 19. Mr. Nakagawa read the following letter from the applicants: "This is in regards to PZ-55-83 (proposed Ordinance No. 249). We will not be able to attend the public hearing of the City Council on March 20, 1984 because we have been sick with the flu and we live in Chandler, about a 30 or 45 minute drive. My reason on this request is so I can obtain a permit for maintaining repairs on our property there Eldon H Unger Carmen F. Unger" REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 7 Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Development Coordinating Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission have no objections to the rezoning request Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 249, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 249, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-55-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES RECONSIDERATION OF MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR ROADHAVEN PHASE I AND II Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THIS ITEM BE CONTINUED TO THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 3, 1984, AT 7 00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public City Manager Michael J. McNulty explained that State law requires that two public hearings must be held prior to the City Council approving a one-time budget override, and that the next public hearing will be held at the next regular City Council meeting At this time, the Council is also looking for input on the street improve- ment bonds. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the issue. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 8 Ask Ain., NEW BUSINESS d- PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 268, AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CITY CODE, MAGISTRATE COURT (First Reading) ) City Attorney David Alexander ( explained that this is an optional amendment to Chapter 5 of the City Code, pertaining to the Magistrate Court Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 268, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 268, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE CHAPTER 5 MAGISTRATE COURT, ARTICLE 5-2 PRESIDING OFFICER, SECTION 5-2-1 CITY MAGISTRATE AND SECTION 5-2-2 ACTING CITY MAGISTRATE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 269, REVISING SECTION 304 (a) BUILDING PERMIT FEES (First Reading) ) Building Official Leo Frazier, Jr., explained that this would modify the 1982 Uniform Building Code to be consistent with the changes made to the 1979 Uniform Building Code, which will require a survey by a licensed surveyor, of the building location on the lot, and will also amend the building permit table t l Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 269, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 269, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REVISING SECTION 304.(a) PERMIT FEES, SECTION 305.(a) GENERAL AND TABLE 3-A OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1982 EDITION; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 270, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 9, HEALTH AND SANITATION, PERTAINING TO LITTER AT CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION SITES ;r, (First Reading with Emergency Clause)) ) Mr. Frazier explained the amendment, which would require litter receptacles on all construction sites Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, I ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 270, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 9 ,- .. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 270, by title only for the first reading with the Emergency Clause. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows• ORDINANCE NO. 270, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE 9-2 REMOVAL OF LITTER, BY ADDING SECTION 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES AND SECTION 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 270, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE 9-2 REMOVAL OF LITTER, BY ADDING SECTION 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES AND SECTION 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried REQUEST TO EXTEND TEMPORARY LIBRARY CLERK POSITION TO END OF FISCAL YEAR) Mr. McNulty stated that the Librarian has indicated the necessity of retaining the services of the temporary full time Library Clerk. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT MRS. DOROTHY SANCHEZ BE RETAINED AS A TEMPORARY FULL-TIME LIBRARY CLERK FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTEEN WEEKS UNTIL THE END OF THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR ON JUNE 30, 1984. Councilman Damian() seconded the motion. • '- VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY GENERATOR, PD-84-1 Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel stated that this is a request for a new Emergency Generator, as the present generator needs to be replaced REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 10 AO 016. p Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE-IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT NEIL'S DETROIT DIESEL BE AWARDED THE BID FOR PD-84-1, 35 KW EMERGENCY GENERATOR SET IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,841.00. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. Amok Councilman Shanks commented that the old generator had been used as a trade in VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR IBM SYSTEM 34, F-84-1 ) ) Controller Keith Lewis stated that the City invited bid proposals to upgrade the disk storage and memory of our IBM System 34, and recommended award of the bid to Bruce Baum and Associates, as the lowest bidder with a total cost of $6,725.00. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT BRUCE BAUM AND ASSOCIATES BE AWARDED THE BID FOR F-84-1, COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR THE IBM SYSTEM 34, IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,725.00. -'1 Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATIONS FROM AND APPOINTMENTS TO THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph explained that as a result of changes in eligibility status, various members have resigned. Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATIONS OF ROSS GREVES, DAVID ALEXANDER, LARRY CLINE, ROGER SHORT, BOB BEESON, JAMES TUVELL, AND ANN LORENZO, FROM THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM, BE ACCEPTED WITH SPECIAL COMMENDATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION IN ITS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT w;. tom`= �a ✓ •," EFFORTS. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ARE HEREBY APPOINTED TO THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM LOCAL OFFICIAL CATEGORY APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT OR DESIGNEE, SANDY SMITH. FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CATEGORY SAVINGS AND LOAN, DAVID NICODEMUS. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 11 EDUCATORS CATEGORY CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE - APACHE JUNCTION CAMPUS, TOM HARPIN. APACHE JUNCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT, TOM JOHNSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CATEGORY TITLE INSURANCE, RUTH ABBOTT. Amak DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CATEGORY CONTRACTOR, TERRY SECOR. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING, MARCH 21, 1984, FOR PURPOSE OF CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 268 AND OTHER COUNCIL MATTERS Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON MARCH 21, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 268, AND OTHER COUNCIL MATTERS. Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING, APRIL 3, 1984, FOR PURPOSE OF VOTE ON ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON APRIL 3, 1984, AT 7 00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTE ON ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS Councilman Taylor seconded the rti motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Damiano questioned the Special Meeting to be held at the same time as the regular Council meeting on April 3, 1984. Ms Connelly explained that according to State law, the actual vote of the Council on the budget override must take place at a Special Meeting after the Regular Meeting begins. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 12 oak WORK SESSION, APRIL 2, 1984 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 1984 Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 2, 1984, AT 7 00 P.M , IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 3, 1984, AT 6:00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried CALL TO THE PUBLIC Mr. Earl Laabs, addressed proposed Ordinance No. 269, amendment to the City Code in regards to the requirement of a survey prior to obtaining a building permit. Mr McNulty stated that the purpose of this amendment is to insure that buildings will be built with the correct setback, as this is not the City's responsibility. Mr. Laabs further expressed his opposition to the amendment because of the cost to the permit applicant. Councilman Steelsmith stated that the contractor should be made aware that he is responsible that the setbacks are correct. Mr. Joe Morvak, 5990 E. Roosevelt, Apache Junction, expressed his agreement with Mr. Laabs' opposition. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Councilman Hill reported that the A.J. Bayless septic tank has been completed Councilman Shanks informed the Council and public of a "Family Violence" forum, sponsored by Pinal County, which will be coming up. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 9 25 P M. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 13 ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR 4 AND CITY COUNCT7-GF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk t REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 20, 1984 PAGE 14 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 � ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSM I TH COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO J VICE MAYOR EIDSON J ' MAYOR CLARKE J UNANITTUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 239 , PZ-46-83 , APPLICATION BY ARTHUR W. MOHR TO REZONE 1 . 25 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED ON NORTH SIDE OF WEST BROADWAY AVENUE , 165 FEET EAST OF SOUTH DELAWARE DRIVE IN SECTION 19 , FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE , TO INCLUDE THE DEDICATION OF THE SOUTH FIFTY ( 50 ' ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES , B : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 242 , PZ-49-83 , APPLICATION BY JOHN AND ALICE KILE TO REZONE 0 . 75 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED ON NORTH SIDE OF GREASEWOOD STREET , 100 FEET EAST OF GRAND DRIVE IN SECTION 18 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE ( TH ) , TO INCLUDE THE DEDICATION OF THE SOUTH THIRTY-THREE (33 ' ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES , C : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 248 , PZ-54-83 , APPLICATION BY WILLIAM J . AND ENA C . MACKENZIE TO REZONE 1 . 25 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH GOLD DRIVE , 165 FEET SOUTH OF WEST TEPEE STREET IN SECTION 17 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ( TH ) , TO INCLUDE THE DEDICATION OF THE EAST THIRTY-THREE ( 33 ' ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES , D : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 249 , PZ-55-83 , APPLICATION BY ELDON H . UNGER AND CARMEN F . UNGER TO REZONE 10 , 200 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL , LOCATED ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST OHIO STREET AND NORTH LAWTHER DRIVE IN SECTION 19 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE , E : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 9 , 1984 , F : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 21 , 1984 , AND G : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 20 , 1984 , BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 254, PZ-2-84 THE APPLICANT IS LOEWENSTEIN 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B, IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED QACNE✓G O(..,r;v111, n�O U.N.. i. .... Z qR/Z0141x Vitt' o C ache @unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 14, 1984 - , .c- ;o; A< ,nda / a het, Item # rit:t re Ing ��f`t 3 S':oriel Reading MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL _IZPudtic Hearing ( ` Old Business THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGERf New Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR 7—. GonAllendar PREPARED �BY: j\A JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-2-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 254) APRIL 3, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 17, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-2-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 254, is a request by the applicants Donna L. and Robert L. Loewenstein to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. The sites are vacant 17,000 and 15,000 square foot parcels located on the east side of Ironwood Drive, 200 feet and 600 feet south of Apache Trail in Section 20. It is designated General Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include businesses and a travel trailer park. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 21 Number of Exempt Properties 13 Number of Affected Owners 8 Number of Signatures 5=62.5% Signatures by Affected Area 52.8% Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the General Commercial Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west seventeen (17' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayot ,id City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-2-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 254) March 14, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of March 13, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion- "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-2-84, also known as proposed Ordinance No. 254, application of Donna and Robert Loewenstein for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations are: The applicant dedicate the west seventeen feet (17' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reason for this recommendation is: It is currently consistent with the General Plan." Recommended Motion See attached. RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 254 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-2-84 , application of Donna L and Robert L Loewenstein ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 254 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND - - PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL the applicant dedicate the west seventeen (17' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) AIR ORDINANCE NO 254 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as- - Parcel No. 1 That portion of the West of the West 1 of the West 1 of the Southwest } of Section 20, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, described as follows. Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest ;, thence south along the west line of said Southwest A, 660 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing south along said west line 230 feet, thence parallel to the north line of said Southwest I, 165 feet; thence north parallel to the west line of said Southwest ;, 230 feet; thence west parallel to the north line of said Southwest ;, 165 feet to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT the south 100 feet thereof, and EXCEPT any part lying within the west thirty-three (33' ) feet of said Southwest ; of Section 20, and Parcel No 2 • That portion of the West A of the West z of the West # of the Southwest A of Section 20, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, described as follows. Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest ;, thence south along the west line of said Southwest ;, 390 feet to the true point of beginning; thence easterly along a line parallel to the north line of said Southwest ;, 165 feet; thence north parallel to the west line of said Southwest A, 120 feet, thence west parallel to the north line of said Southwest ;, 165 feet, thence south 120 feet to the true point of beginning, EXCEPT any part lying within the west thirty-three (33') feet of said Southwest A of Section 20, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the west seventeen (17') feet ,r z of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof eiS ORDINANCE NO. 254 PAGE TWO • PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk • APPROVED AS TO FORM: .: City torney t II 0 • ._ • PZ-2-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 254) 4 • _ + PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE a I APACHE ADDITION ACRES APACHE TRAIL r--- - ---- - --- r. -- -- — — — — — I CB-2 i I CB-2 ■ -- I L _ • I A ! CB- ---, 2 I ,LB-2 i GR I z oI + , f� o l o / 1--- TH — --t cn z ! I- I a // 1 . - I '— r , 1 N B-2 ' I = GR r ) 1 -- IFf- N I V) I AZURE SKI_S 12"' I 1 H I j_ i 1 1 1 I ---------- -I iI 1 - re6 SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 200' i 1 1: LIMITS OF ZONING • • ITEM NO . 3 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 254 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 256 PZ-3-84 THE APPLICANT IS RAFFERTY 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED � PQACHFG O 3 0 n..4 U lil "C1RiZONP CO it y o C pache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 14, 1984 Approver for Agenda pate IteL7 # First Reading yJ`3 1 � S`eccoond Reading MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Public Hearing Old Business THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/` New Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR / Consent Agenda PREPARED BY: \ \JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: lip REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-3-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 256) APRIL 3, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 17, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case PZ-3-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 256, is a request by the applicant Daniel Rafferty through Mike Kovacs to rezone his property from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 2.9 acre parcel located on the north side of Highway 88 and on the south side of Lost Dutchman Boulevard in Section 15. It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, a restaurant, and a store. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 6 Number of Exempt Properties 2 Number of Affected Owners 4 Number of Signatures 3.5=87.5% Signatures by Affected Area , 91 .l% Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-3-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 256) March 14, 1984 Page Two This area of the City is charaterized by its unique views of the Superstition, Goldfield, and Four Peaks Mountains. South of this area are large-lot residential areas. Due to the strategic location of this rezoning request, the control of the uses, heights, bulk, setbacks, access, and design by planned development procedures would be recommended in this case. Some of the uses desired by the applicant may be permitted under CB-1 zoning anyway which would be consistent with the Local Commercial Opportunity designation. There are a few parcels already zoned CB-2 and, therefore, are not conforming to the General Plan. They were, however, zoned that way before the City incorporated. What should be of concern is the expansion of such zoning without adequate safeguards to protect the City's scenic qualities. This applicant has applied for a General Plan amendment (GP-1-84) to have the designation changed from Local Commercial to General Commercial . That request is under separate review. The issues identified above will be some of the issues, among others, that will be examined during the Plan amendment process. Generally, Plan amendments are considered only on an annual basis, the last Plan review having been authorized in October of 1983. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of March 13, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-3-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 256, application of Daniel Rafferty through Mike Kovacs for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the north fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That an approval for a General Plan amendment or a specific plan be approved for this site to General Commercial . The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-3-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 256) March 14, 1984 Page Three "The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . The request is not in compliance with the General Plan, but will probably be in compliance in the future. 2. It would be the highest and best use of the property at this time." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas ORDINANCE NO 256 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT s CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-3-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE ( JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT • SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The East z of the Northwest i of the Northeast I of the Northwest ; of Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, lying north of Highway 88, in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the north fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this f Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for Il any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST • �w�a. I� T•C Y-Yy-5 4� �+ i �i bRf-� +4t •y ab t Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David` AxCdeN City A torney iII PZ-3-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 256) s PROPOSED REZONING FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE i STATE LAND CB-2 / " BI VP_-----.-...-- - ;--7:1 _,.,_.„.. .._,....,.,,,.,_ _ _ , I / r 1 .. ...,, .,. _ _ __ _ j CB-2 CB-1 / • EAST HIDALG STREET 1 1 1 i ! EAST WINDSONG ST. - Q Q - ' ¢ /�-------c-�j�- - 1 = fg = o ¢ < CB-?_ 1z ¢ CC a Ie = I Z Z o ►- I �, Q Q I— NJ � _— _ _ — CB-2 z w w I-- > EAST CONCNO ST. _�1 //� 0 0 cc cl __ z z z z cc EAS }-UUINILI SF i - j SUBJECT SITE _ I N SCALE. 1" = 300' 'I--1 L_� LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE) • -tia�weie 'Fiy..fc"i✓ .rn '�.Bn,..e' °yxV.sr�-t`.�ek�,ti;v''•tjv r'• "4� ri .a�+�,+3-._�. x :h�- �s.�+ r.wxa� ;� . Ada b, 1 /Mk, ITEM NO . 4 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 256 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 256 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-3-84 , application of Daniel Rafferty through Mike Kovacs ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 256 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-3-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL 1. The applicant dedicate the north fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes 2 That an approval for a General Plan amendment or a specific plan be approved for this site to General Commercial BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 257. P7-4-24 THE APPLICANT IS RAGAN . STAGNARO. AND THOMPSON 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR T!-E PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C , OPPOSED k pyACHE✓G O U k : � Z '1RIzo�P ` it 4C pacdte �unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 14, 1984 Approver for Agenda E Date Item Item # First Reading ql/,�J' 5_ Second Reading MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL --)4(Pub1ic Hearing Old Business THROUGH- MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER ,,>, New Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR `' ' '/ Consent Agenda PREPARED BY: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-4-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 257) APRIL 3, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 17, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-4-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 257, is a request by the applicants Kenneth Ragan, Steven Stagnaro, and Norman Thompson to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 7.78 acre parcel located on the north side of Southern Avenue between Acacia and Starr Roads in Section 27. It is designated General Commercial Opportunity and Medium/High Density on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile homes, and a trailer. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 7 Number of Exempt Properties 0 Number of Affected Owners 7 Number of Signatures 4.25=60.7% Signatures by Affected Area 62.2% Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the General Commercial Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend the following: 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-4-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 257) March 14, 1984 Page Two The applicant dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33' ) along Acacia; the east thirty-three feet (33' ) along Starr; and the south fifty feet (50' ) along Southern for public roadway and associated purposes. Two planning issues that need to be addressed in this case are access and land use compatibility. Many of the roads in this area are graded dirt roads and not capable of adequately handling commercial traffic now. However, we may ask that street improvements be made when the property is developed. Particular attention must be given to improve- ments and safe-sight distances at the intersection of Highway 60-89 and Acacia and Starr Roads. No objection has been raised by the isolated GR parcel owner Dorothy Holen who will be surrounded on three sides by commercial development. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of March 13, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion• "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-4-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 257, application of Kenneth Ragan, Steven Stagnaro, and Norman Thompson for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulation or recommendation is. The applicant dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33' ) along Acacia; the east thirty-three feet (33' ) along Starr; and the south fifty feet along Southern for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . These particular properties do abut a major highway which would allow a higher designation than a residential zone. 2. It would be within the realm of the City of Apache Junction General Plan which does allow this area with some flexibility to go to a general business zone." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 257 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-4-84 , application of Kenneth Ragan, Steven Stagnaro, and Norman Thompson ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO.257 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING - ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-4-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL The applicant dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33') along Acacia, the east thirty-three feet (33' ) along Starr, and the south fifty feet (50') along Southern for public roadway and associated purposes } BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) ORDINANCE NO 257 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-4-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL 111 The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as Parcel No 1 The South z of the Southwest I of the Southeast ; of the Southwest ; of the Southeast ; of Section 27, Township 1 _ North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona Parcel No. 2 The North z of the Northwest ; of the Southeast ; of the Southwest $ of the Southeast ; of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 3 " Parcel No 3 The South 2 of the Northwest ; of the Southeast ; of the Southwest ; of the Southeast ; of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. Parcel No 4 The North 1 of the Southwest ; of the Southeast ; of the Southwest ; of the Southeast ; of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. • Parcel No 5 The North # of the Northeast $ of the Southeast ; of the Southwest A of the Southeast ; of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, less highway right-of-way. .•.pr,: 4.,+•Y,wry ���, _.. . Parcel No 6 The South I of the Southeast ; of the Southeast 1 of the Southwest ; of the Southeast 1 of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. Parcel No 7 The South 1 of the Northeast ; of the Southeast ; of the Southwest ; of the Southeast 1 of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, less highway right-of-way I�r► ORDINANCE NO 257 :- PAGE TWO be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33' ) along Acacia, the east thirty-three feet (33') along Starr, and the south fifty feet (50' ) along Southern for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS . . All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions _ - of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof - PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM avi exan City ttorney ,„0001.4, 0......• . . ...1 .-,•-, - , , . PZ-4-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 257) PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE .., EAS r 20TH AVENUE . j —1 CB-2 1 \s\N , I N. 1 •,,•,,,;,•1„--,_,-:..:,,_::::-2-----',:'---,.:.. .--,';-:-,.:'...•;.---:- --•'•-:-L'r•-----' . . I . . .. .-„. .,:. • • - 60 ' . I .. .-- . ,.. , . ..... . .. .09 ' 6)0N. . .. . , ..-• .. . , .• „. . . . . . ! .. .• .. : •• i - - , ... . . . _.. ,. ._ _ - , .. . - __. . .••• . „.. •., ... -, .- .., -.... EAST 22ND AVENUE ,x r , .4. ,.. .. _. . r., i...,.. _. ......_. .. ., .., .. ,... . . . <0 <0 a) g = = A 2 o < ec Ce = I_ 2 < 0 I-- < = x I— : ... , . . 0 . . . .. . _ . . •• • _ .. . EAST SOUTHERN AVENUE . . .. ... . . . - -- • • --.. ro: SUBJECT SITE SCALE: 1" = 200' ...... MUNICIPAL CORPORATE LIMIT _ -- N i_ ; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL) i • FL _ ..R`�51 k .. x R-`wv ?lk'•`a(iws`f {i+.y-"� �+ _ 3:T_ • • • ITEM NO . 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 257 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 259, PZ-6-84 THE APPLICANT IS BURGESS 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C, OPPOSED O �' U '�leiRA Z �zON �'oitij o� Cipac�ieunction �,p P DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 14, 1984 Approver for Agenda L,�� ,pat It g #1 First Reading yJ Second Reading -— MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Old Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR /� New Business Consent Agenda PREPARED BY: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT:' REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-6-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 259) APRIL 3, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 17, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-6-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 259, is a request by the applicant Jerry Burgess to rezone his property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a vacant 2.5 acre parcel located on the northwest corner of Tepee Street and Desert View Drive in Section 18. It is designated Medium/High Density on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and a mobile home. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of property owners 8 Number of exempt properties 1 Number of affected owners 7 Number of signatures 4=57% Signatures by affected area 80% Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density General Plan designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south forty (40' ) feet and the east thirty-three (33' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-6-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 259) March 14, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of March 13, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-6-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 259, application of Jerry Burgess for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application: "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the south forty feet (40' ) and the east thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . The request conforms to the General Plan. 2. It is the highest and best use of the land." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 259 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-6-84 , application of Jerry Burgess ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 259 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS - PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. The applicant dedicate the south forty (40') feet and the east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE. OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) Amor ORDINANCE NO 259 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: The Southwest ; of the Southeast - of the Northwest ; of • Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south forty feet (40') and the east thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions �- '� `w°•r of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY • If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the • validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke " • Mayor - ATTEST- _ Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. C p av• exan City Attorney PZ-6-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 259) PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) • WEST SMOKEIREE STREET w • w > 3 _ cc w 47.1 CC = S Z Z WEST TEPEE STREET I i TH TH 1 I I I , -�,�'-•,*e'er- =�,."��;�O,q=:.-:?sss. r� -M:'��. I WES I S'i IPROCK STRE T SUBJECT SITE N SCALE' 1" = 200' -i LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL) 1 /"1 • w--.4.4cwt5. 4..Sirt 4-q,4,-;c*s.*ze):.'i.- -i.;.'v''-.` .-=Y?:.,y r.*k Y”'s.,xa> !?.?s«.t s9,, F. .-2.7,fi ?r...i..n. -y - -;.— . ...„ rthe.+Yb',,..•, —, - •. -. - - .,-- ,• _- • • '.•. - . - . . ..f'r:��y`� ':,,,z "'4°'e-i�y;, r 0.4„ +s. , a4„t-..4.•,,en.' -a c_.., {. .....+ at4-t+;,,,-.... ,�,.vs34 r t*4; ��.L^s+dMSkh... �" •-• -3 7 • - -• • rN ._ ITEM NO . 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 259 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . Ri;VTSED ROADIIAVEN MOTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona that" a planned development major amendment as set forth below for Roadhaven Phases I and II PPE 6-81 and -19-82) be (approved) (denied) . -fi 1. Trailer Spacing. The minimum distance between all trailers shall be not less than 16.5' . 2. Set-Backs. CLASS ONE: Lots with trailers having a total width of 12' (such as 8' plus 4' tip-out or pull-out) for which the City has issued awning permits may have a minimum set-back on the driveway side of 1' for a period of twenty years or until currently existing permanent improvements, including awnings are removed, whichever comes first. A list of the lots in this category is attached. CLASS TWO: Other lots in Phase I shall have a minimum set-back on the driveway side of 2' . CLASS THREE: Lots in Phase II shall have a minimum set-back on the driveway side of 3' , except that this set-back may be reduced to 2' where the lot owner has been granted an adjacent 2' maintenance easement. a " lkiowa Legal Lot # ... Shoshone Legal Lot # 13 303 307 257 pa1ute Legal Lot # 17 305 311 255 30 16 314 249 907 482 31 166 315 253 910 490 39 170 316 250 k 51 54 335 27 317 320 252 76 ('awnee Legal Lot # 64 32 326 79 1007 492 k. 70 339 341 92 ; 1009 491 77 322 82 345 Seneca Legal Lot # Yakima Legal Lot # 107 307 406 227 1305 569 109 306 407 239 1310 601 116 362 • 409 238 126 367 415 235 \'aqua Legal Lot# 130 369 419 75 134 371 424 50 1422 619 139 466 426 51 140 374 436 56 Yuma Legal Lot # 141 467 438 57 - 142 375 1509 634 149 656 Cheyenne Legal Lot # 1512 648 150 379 1514 647 164 386 502 216 1524 642 170 453 503 223 1 /4 455 • 504 217 Klamath Legal Lot # 178 457 505 222 180 458 509 220 1201 576 202 511 514 401 1203 577 204 512 518 399 1207 579 208 514 520 398 210 515 524 396 2078 101 238 529 526 395 2080 102 248 534 528 394 2082 103 250 535 534 391 2241 354 254 537 538 389 286 553 3eninole Legal Lot # 318 204 Havasupz Legal Lot # 2628 305 5 Loux Legal Lot # 701 404 2680 280 703 405 106 281 705 406 112 284 724 424 120 132 728 422 126 135 732 420 142 143 144 144 Blackfoot Legal Lot# 1 re 5 hawnee Legal Lot # 805 472 809 470 202 261 810 479 211 273 811 469 215 271 216 268 218 269 226 107 230 109 In /ke l Se fir_CAS h'" r70/-eve04. u.� r o U G ��c r�l'�S �v o f A tiLJ�) i ry c S : Iowa Legal Loi. # Kiowa Legal Lot # Sioux Legal Lot # Sioux Legal Lot II 14 7 1G 8 132 138 134 139 58 29 101 310 99 311 Havasupi Legal Lot # Havasupi Legal Lot 1 103 309 127 443 125 444 709 408 374 176 376 175 372 177 • 1 1 S 1 ' •4Rr r --�/LGG7JCPIC_� ./a2- PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR PI ANNFI) DFVFI OPMFNT . THE APPLICANT IS BIDWFI I FOR ROADHAVEN MAJOR AMENDMENT 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED PQACHE✓ C U it O . Z -- -40.-., -.7:-:y. "IPiZONp. 'ity o C pache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 27, 1984 Approver for Agenda Itil ltem,0i� First Reading / Second Rea:ii Public Hengaring Old Business MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI VNew Business Consent Agenda THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/A�� ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR PREPARED BY: AJIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Ie SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 6, 1984 PZ-6-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 92) and PZ-19-82 (ORDINANCE NO. 163) - MAJOR AMENDMENT Project Description This is a request by Harry Bidwell of Roadhaven Resorts for a Planned Development major amendment for Roadhaven Phases I and II to reduce the minimum travel trailer unit separation from 19.5 feet to 16.5 feet, and to reduce the minimum space line setback from three (3' ) feet to zero. The subject property is a developed 93-acre recreational vehicle resort located on the west side of South Idaho Road, 600 feet south of Broadway Avenue, north of 16th Avenue, and east of Buena Vista Drive. In his letter of January 17, 1984, Mr. Bidwell mentions meetings with Mr. Gero where it was agreed that the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions may be amended by Mr. Gero to allow 12 foot and 13 foot wide trailer units. Mr. Gero advised us that he does not recall any such agreement. Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments On July 15, 1981 , the City Council approved Phase I, PZ-6-81 , with the 19.5 foot unit separation. On January 4, 1983, the City Council approved Phase II, PZ-19-82, with a 20 foot unit separation. The DCC is not aware of any authority by which Mr. Gero may have had to amend covenants. It also appears that the City would not concern itself with the enforcement of private covenants anyway. Generally, there was little objection to the amendment request provided that there be 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 .. t. The Honorable k_jor nd City Council Request for Agenda Item - March 6, 1984 PZ-6-81 , PZ-19-82 - Major Amendment Page Two a six foot separation between a storage shed and an adjacent unit and a three foot separation between an awning and a trailer for fire protection purposes. The Zoning Ordinance requires travel trailers and recreational vehicles to be at least three (3' ) feet away from .•. other space lines and twenty (20' ) feet from other units or buildings under conventional TH zoning. The planning staff foresees some long-term adverse planning and develop- ment implications for the City if this amendment is granted. Proponents of similar development projects would point to this waiver as a model by which to follow both from a design standpoint and from a procedural standpoint. One of the common criticisms of Recreational Vehicle Parks is that they appear to be a high density type of development that is oftentimes incompatible with other types of residential development. The requested . reduction in unit separation would give this development an even more congested appearance. The Planned Development plans for Roadhaven were evaluated and approved for only eight to ten foot wide units as indicated in the attached drawings. No evaluation by staff and no approvals were given for 12 to 13 foot wide units. One factor that complicates this problem is that this project was sub- divided by the applicant. The lot lines are fixed but were approved as proposed by the applicant. In the various meetings with the city staff, the applicant was advised to design his project carefully and to allocate enough space for his lots to avoid being outdated by new technology and larger size units. The applicant assured the city that the design of Roadhaven as proposed was what he wanted and that the proposed space sizes were larger than the existing Recreational Vehicle Park spaces. In a developer's desire to obtain the most profits by creating the smallest lots practical and to obtain the greatest density, he limits his own opportunities to meet the demands of a changing market if he subdivides. It appears that this is a case where long-term project planning and market trends were disregarded in the design process and the applicant is requesting the city to compromise its standards by extricating the developer from his short-sighted approach to planning. The perilous implication here is that future developers may design hastily and unwisely but then ask the city to relieve them from the predicament. The Honorable Ma' ."mid City Council Request for Agenuu icem - March 6, 1984 PZ-6-81 , PZ-19-82 - Major Amendment Page Three In dissenting from the other members of the Development Coordinating Committee, the Planning staff for the above reasons would recommend denial of the requested amendment. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that a Planned Development major amendment by Harry Bidwell for a reduction to 16.5 feet in the distance between trailer units and for a reduction to zero feet in the setback distance to space lines for Roadhaven Phases I and II (PZ-6-81 and PZ-19-82) be (approved) (denied) . The reasons for this action are: (list) Stipulations shall be: 1. That a six (6' ) foot separation between a trailer unit and a storage shed be maintained and a three (3' ) foot separation between an awning and a trailer be maintained. JAN:j1 p ACHE z G r b�'•- 1D ,. ".. 1'r� -s ,, . f .;�.a gR�zOP -6 Vity o, 4pac�2e unction Approver for Agenda Icq e Item # Amok March 28, 1984 First iicading Second Reading Pubic Hearing _ Old Business MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OFAD.'E CIMACOUNi?i s FROM: MICHAEL McNULTY, CITY MANAGER '' .4 Consent Agenda SUBJECT: ROADHAVEN - MAJOR AMENDMENT Developers of Roadhaven have requested that they be allowed to change their P.D. to allow 0 lot lines and 16.5' between dwelling units. There are several things which I believe need to be remembered concerning this project. The first is that the project is NOT the mobile home park, it is a subdivision of land. The next is that, in this instance we are not dealing with spaces but rather with individually owned lots. Because private ownership is involved the question of setbacks and separation between buildings is a prime consideration, just as it would be in any other subdivision. If the Council had approved 0 lot lines in the beginning the developer would have been required to provide maintenance easements on the 'mik adjoining lots. This means that if you were to approve 0 lot lines at this point problems would result between lot owners. It is, however, a fact that a large number of dwelling units have moved in and are in violation of the set backs . Many of these units have awnings attached. It appears to me that the Council has the following options: 1 . Approve amendment as requested - not recommended. 2. Deny the request, and require all dwelling units to adhere to the setback requirements - not recommended. 3. Require three-foot setbacks and allow three 13.5' between units. 4. Require two foot setbacks and allow 14.5' between units. If three is approved, the units that are currently less than three feet setback, require developer to provide maintenance easements for adjacent lots under their control . Further require that these lots enjoin a non-conformity for no more than ten-years. This non-conformity would 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 apply only to those lots less than three feet from the property line. I believe that either option three or four is an acceptable solution to the problem. MJMc/jtl FEB '7J ? 139,4 -.Roadhaven . _ Resorts, Inc. o ,tt 5 7631 Greenway Rood Scottsdale Anpor1 Scottsda e AZ 85260.602 998 3233 Amok January 17 , 1984 The Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction , Arizona 85220 Re . PS-19-82 (Proposed Ordinance No . 163 ) Major Amendment -- Trailer Widths and Lot Lines Gentlemen : It is respectfully requested that an amendment be granted to the Subdivision Planned Development of Roadhaven Resort of Apache Junction . During the various meetings with Mr . Gero , Director of Planning and Zoning , it was his suggestion that the Covenants , Conditions and Restrictions of the Resort be amended by him for control under which the Resort would be conducted . One of the areas agreed upon , owing to the many changes of manufacturers , was a vehicle width of twelve feet ( 12 ' ) , later amended to thirteen feet ( 13 ' ) - this document was recorded and has been in use since the inception . We have been notified by Mr . Leo Frazier , Chief Building Inspector , that this Covenant is in conflict with the Planned Development requirements . Mr . Frazier has therefor suggested that a major amend- ment be submitted to the City Council of Apache Junction to bring the two documents in line and to rectify this conflict of measurements . The Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2 January 17 , 1984 Attached are the proposed dimensions to be applied and incorporated into the general layout of the Resort . Very truly yours , ROADHAVEN RESORTS , INC . Harry R. Bidwell President HRB : sg Enclosure cc : Mr . Leo Frazier Chief Building Inspector .._.. H 00 •Amok AM\ r ' N, ,f'-- 1 4 8" z 36i °° ' J _ z , _. ,\► r0• -, r-- ` 862. w ZONING GR , --- j 2 36 /4' f e6� _ als4 J � ti.p �� 5 'y G 8 � aG‹ , 39: > �,., 41 \ :-.7,°/ ' Z ••••,.....'''. ... .7 '2� 3GC v <C r s �135 �� P O %4- ` ` _ — —/— 7-, // f sD za ... ... ..'.':fit:'... ... W �. 3j, ' /1] " '—lay'— ; ,t © —- CI / < n 1�,c° yid I �i 1� ^Le ill en e • pfZAs.✓— ---- 5: - 1 n / I .^ i- �,; .s" -.:4 r i ,i �F Al. 2' _IOC---�--� 3 s ` J \*/ \ ZONING GR ::..:::) ;ter- - 37?/e. UNSUBDIVIDED \ t \ 4t \/ N. It 7tis f` P. it . !!11 7`' 1, �.� % �a b Q /tiDiCATcS f.RE f/YDR4NT3 a ��. cE rip -� 168 Z o ,) NOTES hi �. , 2 I 0 ,, 169 - 6 PVC • WATER- 7.; — — d„i✓C �S O 75 —34 —58' (,, Y S?' • : n ^, .. • "�� r a 1 \l78 /77 /76 175 /74 173 7T� /7/ ,1i 25 1 \ !he•of 96'� ` r3Q 3-1 4: 3: 34! - 3G \ ?7 IL_-_55.--el / m, vinznrs r?c�:s y��-s TDta. 7 0,Gc" a .._ Q. .Qred /6,,c Stree,- • /? . L7en S,ry 9 35..1'J i? = ..;4935) sZ AVE.• 1 J fired P,vare 5rreer5 .59,4, r4/!,n ,.o/.4red /65O5f `� �D; i 1 `� / Act Ores ?57A5 qre Lc :red(Aer,he•) 7,29 5 i ).\ 3:,\\3,: 3i 34 34 4 3.:' \34 \34 \6 55'• /9 4,..l22 yl23 113\., II4 _,` 115 /16 l7 �0 1 -ovn/.Gc,�s JEN& MIMPI: \ 6 c . wATE ' BRA55 CAP EAST Or'Tenet PAST.4PPROX Ertrrn' 0lrs/b..n /50'N f 33 W LU' ¢ /NT /047/0 RD.r t 7./ P r'c r' ..=0 G095 ,r, bh .) BROADrYAY .41 E -16`—— - - ,. B/a',C sG(O// N / 3.�i Cinfofkvrd�Uc g •• ••• _rfrech:r 5;. Coh 46.6% ELEV-/70Z 42 Go/FCavncf'•aC f7nnt.7: .49ode % 4 /}/t,e 5 I \� /1 f1 I I ;: r r -I�6 '�— — — r ---r .a L`LFc%R/C - 5,eP \(, \ �O I I 6 7ELE''/J.-WE *77"13E-- ` 306d' �6,�.ie- ) I PREPARED BY• C REfuSE AER D/5P 54L 3EPIiCE __ F. ,„s�aowvY { d[/t;47_'R ,5 LM JPR/MG5 e4RiZONA� •j --T cECiv .��• GLATL COM,�AwE 5 r, 0 , p-rEPT/C -.i gx/Se GA.O/ 2f Ah'i'ct//7f-1.-P�� 8 v • 7y ENGINEERING 8 SURVEYING OF ARIZONA INC. h < o.?. //I Raadneren '0 v 200 Q r/'/ / %/_ _ _ 404 E. 1ST AVE MESA, ARIZONA 85204 969.3200 \o,`j r / //7 y "t ,,., ,n"r.C• - \ o � \o ; 74,«r4 •`i GOLF COURSE ARCHITECTS ` '` " _ '�' _ a /%�/� 8453 N. BLACK CANYON SUITE /02 ' r h rl//' -� PHOENIX, ARIZONA 8502/ 864-0444 i �����V `t .-��°�°' tr i „fed.,G,�:0 (3:ZA:-/- �a., .,ram s��ft� _ _ `••<'•�! v//a Bbta I� 19 1 00430•^t1, I • r r ' 'li. tt * i V' I 41, ''eL , . J , ,. ' j t e , , 11$ ,5' p.U.E. -- - - - - _...... __._ _ _ ____ ____ _ _ — --- ) -A ? -A o- • c-D o -0 ? -P 9) 0 0 ..- . -3 -.0 9) • ''ro. , . t ) ,.-- o. \ O. ) \ '0 ('S,\ V.' \0\ '5* ' A3 \COC',37 *.•'.-- -.4 \ O' i., 7 c.,c3 \-.. - . .. s -f• \?) ... \t‘ s - 17 ( -1*- \\iNc2 STREET -Anti4breeT r. 42° -"r Dr 151DvJELL ROADHAVEN RESORTTvpi. / OF LAYOUTAPACHE rAL LOT JuNcr • ROADHAVEN RESORT OF APACHE JUNCTION I11I01V11ION 01 PART OF TN! N01/4 OF t•CTION II TIN Ill, .funvraY, - — FINAL COUNTY 011101A r •`•r ' al a1N1A0YA1 ..��. .NrIRYI •�r•� `�/•.l • r ouuwa _ V \.,M twlr iiwI1 \ IJ i a PIN NI WI If 11(1 IKN.tI Nay YKN some r. FN•.IN r Acme trrWtlr.•r 6 ,—���� a0 Y• • WI a;YYMVU YN•1 aIYMN utfl}:I••,MAN I/Y Y Na1N.y / • `�• 11�.u�'IrG.1•Ix I�. lw u •1 r • 11 NAIO• N11 W•O(xll•YI Y 1 f r•!• r M IIM401 101ru• 1Wa�M to mot M1 MALII AM,,,1Y11w Iwl•MaA lr 14<1111.lo •u .M.61 1.... .\.:.. .. ..11 .. ``.. t w 4at11lGLL�JIr11l OAo11 uoA, I OY».. .I NAI MI 1.1.141 MIa Iolt alMM16i1rA•.,uM eYalauu tM Irlr.� ��IAM/Y1{ IIA4LI RAIN 11•1 tMrII••.. I It r rN 1NA IIII:..411141I SIA I: AII1;1I .r1• rrrfff MMM YY11aaMul11tr:r W I qqxr 11NtllrI,1•. I.11O I•:M,MIr1 III••K[YYO.I G, dlalcl,M.rIY r II iM.�y'1 us•IiNM' •r r INIYIN 11N rM•1lr lyl twos No.Y,IOMI.1 Y Iu >oP 1 • •r .Ic1 as•1a11N1(1101IN.xIYM 1 1 .Dv lrVRt wN 1� 1 Y N•WIII tMrlrll t1 IN MN .YI•tIr_ M1•..a lydb PI. M A. M wm. r1e a.W _ /, liti ••t I• iliW...10 Y Nwy.,ilo-dIi0w,..1• tY•Iul..• �/; /✓f I Ir r cuvwNl/,tY111.11 MI MO11.1100 I.AO40MM• IN•1 r00 IN rrs OY w_i \], " t �y MAOM I YI 1MII OM OW.• C � \� diiiiNllab,ia fNMlia u ♦ r n um.wa,n rot: cwu a u1 M WWI or IN Num•I•Mouoo Au3 Mrla.lw MIMIC MIMI MIIMM I• It•110 MIA• I.444 4 • 111•w rr:;I 11t1 t a. 11 Y • I . 1 2..W:•a'l 1 [1 1 41 I• •Ir.11 Ylvl Mrlll"IAOAI IM I.I.Ytlw r11 r IM . .II IDI M.]W • 1 _ 1\•��>�i4:� �•.IN 10 Ar W1u O.o lla.11.Illllw"OXx i .It•IIWI Yllaai4A.11010 r•r•11 N W 111 r�•' 1p. • w •u10 Ow I MI";Aor»1. .OA I•4aN i1 Yr4NW l0 NI•..1 •�a u M Ow c a•,r ::W I IN 1 Worm V I:a114 O AM, O 11•. MI 1 . 1 O, t• u 1 r M I Sa0r1 M 1 Arnorl „M i 1»rl I atr9r'Yrx I.1�a4••AA•IIAiri tOAMAt.r O 1l""vir.."pn l:u.rllgrN. •�� . r r� _ Ia Ul11I AIOII SSIY4(r4KG r1011•vaa w 1u so... Nc o: • • ru s »l Y �// 1 •iswl aal• . .r••' 4 Fat.1 AANI•(1N rood ttI,.0 CO AM.....IA•SW41 r a•1.rYI At trAWr AM•N AO IOA.Y•M•AA1 NAM YONAII•III 1N IW tt"arW 1I r» ]011 W/AAYO.I4I AvC rM 1N Mt a ▪� . ..\ \ �•, /1Q1oM ARIZONA SNOT II YI•a31111a.Y:N wM•1 r N 11Wr"ar.""rqi 1 awNa a." A• err �.... jjØ I• � u�tl •'IIm1W.illu l:ir.i• ''M Iw... .1 m Y la.o nPOMO.Aw• 1101IN rM MN a tot 0.•IW.1I0A•t Molt11.Or Mott./A•autl W U. A. M AA SHEET 3 Mt••.rW /1f •NYr I MMO.M a1I r w Wr1t1Y. 1.7\\•\ ., r .7::*N . elk ... 11111 • " .. ‘.. 7,4-- 1 It 2-. i;:-.. " 1. ;_i 1 i • j • " _' F • -a:Yl . �r -�\• . Mt t .tRL �Yr.fa•• C� / 2 0 L 1 -eoNT.I r r.. ��` •• r_; 1i ! 1 ::T' c 4 M1 Ia• aI111III.tO m 1 Mc a arrant�I INlllr M.iMM (�{/) ap. 'NNr rta 1 • •nuna.dui u•:iti'itlaMr11a 1,tN a Mm Aisaiu.,.1�. a M•ttwta MaA wnr 1. r• % Y � \,,, uPI" c.AYxt1,I I»MS YS SR --AA .. 6 .1 i f,« • i-\ • i:, ; ...CMS Iw.0 . a.M I . `•, „- .AYc•n• caw.a NNNA al W1 lll _� �.UtI; AI NI ..aUrll rurc ulaalr ualYn 1110 ato• . 1.a• •o.• .N41 I11—.7 .1 _ i���,� (-�[��� T[—.. .• .•.1\, tu•11NIlu MIMA M 1•Y N.I.INI NI II IN �N• �A \rWl \\`\.al O•..rIH rill a I•fx.11 M•la II 1111t1O IO t a WOWO u a•aa •Y Al HNIAYI • .- -----_---- • Mt110.I111.tYlAa Y R -- 0 1 I I SON . ••o1111 rA•a ►T.A •NT AMERICAN ENIIINGERING CO. r•Z• 1 PrOl POI )001.A -6-81 ICS 10.rat $NEST I OFi l —� ___--- APICAAV:AIISOIT 0/ •��� AIACNI dMCT10N I ROADHAVEN RESORT OF APACHE JUNCTION - PHASE 2 A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T IN.,H BE G DSHB C fA , FINAL COUNTY,ARIZONA . a.�ar.: .r .1 AO •Nr n.•f• �- :l;u:«nrr u,w/ :wrAv:wi nyr•r.r rnwu. (.: ...82....,f a:r...r•-"J r �N I -~.r.• •: `r l,...iii/ i .�`� \ ` t. \ \ \5 I i •.r.. • 1 I :u.m I�1�i \•\•• I Ir fir• .. • . 1 1 S. \r::\ . ••a va WI •r 1.•1•wt••..rrawN 1 ..f ,,?:t'1t ;•• yJ,;P; _/7�_`'T,r. \ _ - ••x.��.l w" Jtl Strr• „„ u• '•�•'•».'• rr.. .. - _ _ IC_�� / yF \• \ 'F1'� `d, �t�ar� .fAf'Jz.'ari �f� Jlo . i'�ff .•y�l`l� �k.... •i,;.,. _C -ri�i.„, , i • a a.\ 7 :ri" f' ur \ u 3 1 / a ,.r 1 1 •11 ,jCLsi �T� :lit a Y ✓: ��•.Sa! SC'j • '••� Jir ,I.J+► .o,I,•,;Li A Lf �u• . J.r .. .j4I•. 'I id"' ta•.k►' -�i:� �; � •{io3.•� - •ri"::: ( r P .?7` if. •t r• .•t� a',+E K R1 (� i 1 ft1 y 11!j. ""--"'ice .'-\o� -• \�.•\4,,11., `.n. tj1.11'x+ 1,..•� � ') 1`tq� ''t » r,::: � s �'}'�. °'•il f IIc: t.--. ,1Vs.- - .'••Y.-, , •t,�s: ,'•fool.tr' i »2 i� > .a\f'i J'.•� »t I t :t. ut- ,i•. {' ,�'. !is `0 l ': �l,a�+�/ l/f.- r �'• .•J Y /' ' �•t;N'• J! f l/ 1{ �V\• 4f yl /' l�ti•�::� rJ +l"1+1� 1J� .1 • 11011'Zfir/}/ of t Y tt 1�t .•4/ •a A•�,`•T T'S:. ` \'7' ,iet IJ_r;ii1 ` 8 l• 1.' kit!rf •••� a.Ni.h.$ r N "' i. ''��y�lr c ,..,,,., ti: - 1.,^�rf rJl/•1.. :1J:' ll:Jil a.r•�' "' Y r i 'ass, . l + ! 1 Y v. ' k fA.t or •'l o �,.` Jf;�x .•d a.r• •„s' JJf = ,n , . I t ',yt,.. cssi u•i�e .r.'\.r Jil p'('.q ` 1•'ot I.( r .fn'�. J t d` , t = t a /PS •✓„ni _agree .. _ pr�•r�r:_ ,;-.f fir„k•G 1; J.r•. 'Eel- ff�e, " 'A': ,n ( 1 1 •... fBlr, f ob'It••J./l`1 .:i it .. r-C \ f ` if p, 'a 7.'sZ .r�r ,✓ �:+01. 1 r• i ` i ..I .�• -�,�- lit, n.• 1 r : •`y JJ/J<• V; \•�\J0,1 i.•. a { •.1 1,t( t/f� /i'r/r• /r .•0 i j••'� t 7J!,r^fY y N -1 I.i.j'.l,tl q ,u` fl;' w''fr fo;.\,fr�at a•• ✓'• »'%%777 . 1 l . J3,e/ f L .4 aq' 1. \ i `\' \ \ Ja,l �` \ lI . i t 4•.7;• e t 1 \•...r,l ✓iiirij .X"'t,i 5'g`.t,wrp..,'i1,•..• ", r,,1al �•� \ �:/v�` ». 'S�ijN.,�.'l.t-... \`,\! nI ;f1 n �' > e`i ,.Sr1.K,._ n1 ;a*"_ A „Cr. .j. t��f ._ . ti\(tra_' -/?. Jf,-i t r -'•,xT r.o`�. -••rw:f. ` /i• .1` k1•. \/ 1.• • 01 �r';Y •,,...Piirt , or .. , ' ti. .I O`!l\(f„ .f\N !!•f fI M,7J" (o \ it's, ." �," IS:'. I J\ ;J.Yc'� , s. j r••.�yff. E .r•.{}i tf ';1"�Iy�r�� ''N'": Ii ' L: c.,. .;; • 1.A.. .••r.• / ,I...\ «..\.,.\r.!y ii' .• \{.� r 1 'ii• •�1- . v .f w't• . •If/' t 03 i trfi•rl•�,p ;5rf.wtA?grt�r tonee r_1'. � K+ \ - - �lr•• s �u;• ' ✓A,. fr, .l-J . 'r J :..:r:w.,S„•rt-.rx.u�. 4' . '3: i.1 rl,,e.. \ ;S••r..*=t ..,... • 1 :ifl: c' O r .r;i !li •n r f'�' • \ ! •., / 1`a ^•.' A ...Y d 1 fo y.! 'a ` rl ... ,/ r r.rar Y' l •` 1+"U,rl/ Y:' i. rso,•'w. .r� re.cr . e is:. ' •t ' !1'dl • .l"' '' ` r.r,.. 1 r 1 .,t • . ,4••• '� f Z >1r i i +•t ii 4,s; .11,4 \w r•w, \ i 4 iii.r4 t 0'• e" a•["(•;1 rf/'�'•f' I •i4 'i 'Nl. r I'I,- i'.. !+'� \. '. \ ; 1 V...,,...J •,n i •_. �� ' : 6 ....ri. Jo Y•,... \" \ e t t 6.f'C•tsi:s' 4.. ' \• . ,1. • a••..�. �;".t...\.. T 'r1+1, •r. Y 1 c'. J.; ' f` f: tt ( ' �•T,'s- .c ,,� .i.r t�5T�fv'\f.l.f/i�lj3114,,J! . •ter' I . 7N in 4. ''� t \ t \ . I E MM 4 ,'i'i• ....vtfs 1 15gA •i♦ 1w,___.4..w .•..l 91_ I f• i �. ..sent' 1. r 11 !n rl ! •� w !i:;'^� 1.w.. ,f '\E f �f�� :Jr:; �.of�'•�f�'f9 r L '..r;:J',1' f' _ � - i}y•t.l a • a,I aiii I ;,4.4. N..I _ !r P f 9t S F r• F� fl•. . y%.�' "" Jt• z :wen =cif e±.r(- Y'�$.!, . i• \ --/41e. -__�'I .��.ui t.1, Q1, � '• .•..'. �f\ ..t`1 �Im .,',i ••\f/f+f.•Fll' .'a.(Y.. .r 'tf7.1'... Irlf 1• 1 • ' •J! aJi+l•�N .,Il•wi ��• {[ 1 'r ,-,c2'i'° 'f• `1. .♦ 00. r rfO ., x; it I1�1 1 i,�y . ...- er �� r-•n'Oc0 r t w t•.«t,- Jor.`Jorlao) h. .?''t fcv�i."'^? ,,;f'" '''.`'ri,.. f.�, •,.tits.! ,`T.+r. /,... • 'ryr 'YT' '-'1., 1,`' ili r _,. ! jw.;\ .• -r':Gta• •'a't•..' w�f .. a xl•4•"• .•..r»sr u� t,e ''i A' K :r, cR It -n 44 A r'o h,'I+ ,n °r t„F. ` •. _.Qt/M �'+ «iY•rw SA •`.red r"•+ rf y dl",•y .... i •t!r Ali„ .,l. . •".,��rj.r.r 1 ,�I�, d. J r1 i, �. I ,• r ,aY. `.1 S..i JL,"� ,f'"' L tJl, , I IL S�l' YY . •tf.;'L ll li' •s.'':A „ J 7 (et rf .ri o t. rr • jn. sib l''''; JM I I••• .„•f 'fc. ,h l� ri I:" '••..% rtr`w ,y.1 :'Xk:,ry :•1•714e a/JJ eN ^ `.:, 1 r'' \ I .r, .-u,. rod «iw t,."� �•\: .: ,. .\. t1I' v'.• ,1/ •-- I• of .._., ?� r)...rl..". :.I .r, 1 iY •r ,E ,f^.• .of _ p•�r r. .. r. \`�+ •aria• I 1 r ! I!l �w .,• i 1 •I I _._,•ir•r2._ •L ~. 1 1,f•• fY ly .'7; .y.�,•• _, +.S.„,„.•t ':,r,f.fs.`tr,art trFrto • •:yr•,t' ir;. '. i/ `r,. ri'' 1 ' s•r,. -cr• 4 r••• • io'•:.'••rf ` ,'Ir• \ •'-• �• ;• a \ •� ;''• •4,'Z 1. y ';l .o: f•/ :' 1, it.,: 'for '°roo`i �fl • *! V-- \ 'Efis; •a:I '•. •a• /•./:iN.1 ii•.iri••7 /.a,'y�b,,l,, Irh'• {It 1 Y•�.l It rlAtr r ; fi ( \i t �.• .1r sa:we: it �spAiI'too,1. .1;r, : .. { C1\ ! •\ . �• zoi •f.... iOt. ,I'• ,i• '•,.1. 4 \ f \ i .'.:Tks...•\N.i 1 ��••O�•1 wJf.... ••'I lit',•`' 1 • '.ei la`c,., •a.'+ y..\17:1•-•' a: ; { \` = I`l..•+�. ,i' // / /et.'`•r.�11/ /1r1�•/,i���''•••`' E +2 f ]!: .i' \. \"�. �'` ..tt !1 ♦ \ .•. . "_•F�+.4y t• d` /lT,.jl l • 1! of t. S011.to, •qO 'If Cyr.),.J�,N...T,.� 1 ""-.E A.Y 1 1 \ =ur-r.• '- -. \: \•i..,,a :{, I.k �-,rO 1 T w, 1 u`. � 7?? 'I ••,. ..; . ,.,..p1.\ .. .r• _ r -•r ,.r'_ fC '..l.r-'�a1f- - �f ` �i +�: A J:a F.•;�c,•.,Y„..ri•.� u; e.uJr,"u,.bi.o s_.��_ rf f}i-w +�• f a n err__ ._ __. _ lb� T( i .'7r. w •\.,.. r .'. „ • 6v t) '�1 'it !i? ,\ l,14 k11fr n.[tn' y ,� Li'�nW1r'1I,,•'l.. • % .\f•J7 .yro.,f l: .O• I. 'Nit. 1,5 N4,/la,, ,Aro I,��a7laf'}`rS ' '' •1� l'I/ lli\y It•�•l� r/p�•y f •11+'1 a�r!•'N+'•fl•r/<•f)7,t\\do,,\a,:,OtF iGi . `4 is r \ 4".:•�. ..l'C.. „ e .•ow ir: . e.r\ n.r1e.a.;.1,A•,..1 1•tl".i..:.• .•••.n••N \,i•.w r wrr. �1.� 1 - a f w%%\..z�' .. Y �.1s .:�.. r.:/•. %uw• r,frA �.••• r.•.NIi r���•t+•fr /:14 / ..'� \ t..:?�wi ...\ Y ..\" r ?.',7/f• ol,rr / WAWA PM•I• ll•' / •.•.•.., vta:•v:(n Na•r •INS r,4\e9.i..Lrrn. n ��IIi .tt.Ic• N•. 7f •..r•,ilwri ^p I 1 \•r ' 1 I I T I F ENOINEENINO AND IUNVECINO Of •N120N• INC ir:• r r- I'f a ' I I I ! 1 •.Aa•RAAPJr na7F I II I 1 4O1 3•ST 13T AVE VISA ARIZONA 0320♦ f- I .,1.+•..r I«•r.s I I I I I RIB 3200 201122820101 f w 1 l 1 Jor a (- 'i HONORABLE MAYOR ara COUNCIL MEMBERS, my name is "Bud Perry", I am a lot owner and six month resident of Roadhaven Resort. I have been asked to serve as spokesman for the lot owners of Roadhaven Resort at tonights meeting. I am sure that what happened to my wife and myself also happened to the many lot owners who now reside at Roadhaven Resort. In coining to Arizona and the valley looking for a nice park to spend our winter months in retirement;we happened upon Roadhaven Resort here in Apache Junction. We were overwhelmed by the beautiful well designed park, the out- standing recreational facilities, the fabulous view of the Superstition Mountains and the small town atmosphere of Apache Junction. We immediately purchased a lot and began to make plans for our new winter home. We spent several months building decorative walls, enlarging pw#wo building storage shed, planting trees and finishing our landscaping. We lot owners at Roadhaven Resort have invested $25,000.00 to $40,000.00 in property and improvements, with the addition of park models our investments will run up to $60,00.00 to $70,000.00. The past months we and many other lot owners have been shopping for a park model to put on our lots and complete our dream for our new winter home at Roadhaven Resort. We have, now, learned in the past week or so that due to zoning width limits, eight to Len feet widths, and set back lines, we and other lot owners are not allowed to put a 8 foot park model with a 4 foot slide out on our lots making the total width 12 feet or 13 feet, that we are zoned for 8 foot to 10 feet. In reference to 3 feet set back opposite the door side versus the zero lot line. We lot owners feel that to shift each unit 3 feet would accomplish nothing. As the space between units would be the same regardless of where the units are placed on our lots. What the 3 foot set back does is of the utmost importance to us as it takes away 3 feet of valuable living space on the patio side of our units. The 3 feet of space on the sewer and utility side would be unusable for living space for the lot owner or for his neighbor. We need this space on the living side of our units for a decent size patio and a decent size Arizona Room and storage shed. We and many other lot owners have spent time in other condominium parks and also rental parks where the park models are allowed either on the lot line or one foot off the lot line. Many of the parks in this area also allow their park models on the lot line or one foot off. They allow it for one reason, to give their lot owners or residents more living space on the patio side of their units. PAGE 2 In reference to the width of units that are allowed in Roadhaven Resort, 8 foot to 10 feet. Eight (8) Coot park model with a 2 foot slide out, we cannot find anyone who ever heard of such a unit that size, all park models for years have been 8 foot with 4 to 5 foot slideouts. We,Lhe lot owners of Roadhaven Resort,feel that we have one of the finest resorts of its kind anywhere in the country. Our recreational facilities and our golf course complex are of deluxe quality. Our lot owners are improving their p lots with beautiful brick walls, patios and are maintaining their lots in first class condition. We invite any of the city council members to visit Roadhaven Resort at anytime to see what we as lot owners are doing to beautify our resort. We, the lot owners, feel that Roadhaven Resort is a tremendous asset to Apache Junction,economically as well as a beautiful park. We find ourselves, tonight, in a state of bewilderment and very unhappy with the turn of events the past few weeks. All of the sudden after two years of operation and quality growth we find ourselves being red tagged, zoning differences, width limits, etc. We cannot get permits for awnings and many other restrictions. Our question as lot owners is, "WHY" After two years of operation and a resort that is second to none. We lot owners of Roadhaven Resort are at a loss to understand. Tonight we as lot owners of Roadhaven Resort and winter residents of Apache Junction appeal to you to consider and render a favorable decision on the matters before you regarding the future of our resort. We live here, we are proud of Roadhaven Resort and of Apache Junction. We want a nice park and a good city and we will cooperate in any way we can to make it so. We feel LhaL we are not asking for anything that will harm the health and welfare of the residents of our resort or any of our surrounding neighbors. We want to continue to enjoy the quality of life we have established in our resort and to finish what we have started,Most of all we want to be responsible psi. rS and to be an asset to the community of Apache Junction. Thank you, ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTESX° V\ 11;p4-)-/ ,ri\-, A i -, \ rj -i ITEM # IA MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAI`! DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMI TH "/ VICE MAYOR EIDSON v COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN. _LULL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 1 VO/P1)(1 4Y° ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET A.1))Fil `Y NOTES 67:)/()i0 *)A ITEM II 1 MEETIidG OF f90TI0?J BY: SECONDED BY: 4Jliej2i Y�s NO ABSTAINED I E MAYOR i IL .... COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH s NCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN Hill .COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓/ ,COUNCILMAN DAMIANO .ATfiK6&NOLAARIZf UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAIPlED TOTAL 1 cf) \ ITEM NO . 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT BY HARRY BIDWELL FOR A REDUCTION TO 16 . 5 FEET IN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TRAILER UNITS AND FOR A REDUCTION TO ZERO FEET IN THE SETBACK DISTANCE TO SPACE LINES FOR ROADHAVEN PHASES I AND II (PZ-6-81 AND PZ-19-82 ) BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS : 1 . THAT A SIX (6 ' ) FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN A TRAILER UNIT AND A STORAGE SHED BE MAINTAINED AND A THREE (3 ' ) FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN AN AWNING AND A TRAILER BE MAINTAINED . FOR APPROVAL t- _ - -..n+ 'f`'2r"" i z m.,,, ax .:., err " W`:r r+-+x a -.i -si w'a-•"l'+-u 3c avrt. . ti'-°'- t ITEM NO . 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT BY HARRY BIDWELL FOR A REDUCTION TO 16 . 5 FEET IN THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TRAILER UNITS AND FOR A REDUCTION TO ZERO FEET IN THE SETBACK DISTANCE TO SPACE LINES FOR ROADHAVEN PHASES I AND II (PZ-6-81 AND PZ-19-82 ) BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL A\ - • ITEM NO . 7 Option 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR A REDUCTION TO THREE-FOOT SETBACKS AND ALLOW 13 . 5 ' BETWEEN UNITS FOR ROADHAVEN PHASES I AND II (PZ-6-81 AND PZ-19-82 ) , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED . Option 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR A REDUCTION TO TWO FOOT SETBACKS AND ALLOW 14 . 5 ' BETWEEN UNITS , FOR ROADHAVEN PHASES I AND II ( PZ-6-81 AND PZ-19-82 ) , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED . PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR BUDGFT OVFRRTDF AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS - PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-14 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF C TTY FA IAGFR/C T TY CI FRK 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME , 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , PUBLIC HEARING 1 . THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR RUD( FT OVFRRTDF AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2. THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CTTY MANAGFR/C T TY CL FRK 3. THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC . Amok III\ PQp.CHF ` , O 14, i1 lY i`` 111 0 U a s'i,-4'a a s ' Z � z RI o��P c0it j o A pache unction March 14, 1984 r• MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR ND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER i�_ ✓ 1 FROM: CITY CLERK V SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARINGS ON BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 41-563.01, two public hearings are required prior to the City Council approving a one- time budget override. These hearings have been published in compliance with state law and are scheduled for the regular council meetings of March 20th and again on April 3rd. Immediately following the second public hearing on April 3rd, the council must convene in a special meeting in order to take the actual vote on the excess expenditure. At this time, the purposes of the expenditure must be stated along with the source of revenue used to finance these expenditures. 00.16, In addition to the one-time override hearings, public hearings will also be held to solicit public input on the street improvement bonds. These public hearings will be held in conjunction with the ones on the override and will require council adoption of a resolution authorizing the bonds after the April 3rd hearing. Attached are copies of the memos previously distributed by the City Manager pertaining to both of these measures. �� Approver for Agenda /"�----/ at Item # First Reading 3rd./? f O kmc Second Reading _I Public Hearing - Old Business - New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 f (c:i)p,CHFa li U 6., I < f ,. 0 ;; , ': " ,;'_ ."'Y:z} ki. Z �RiZoNP V ity o . c94pache unction March 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SUGGESTED PROJECTS - OVERRIDE The following is a list of possible projects that could be funded from the $800,000 plus that will be the subject of the May vote by the community. 1. Library 5,500 square feet = $400,000. 2. Prospector Park 1st place = $300,000. 3. Added space City Hall Complex = $190,000. These projects represent what I believe to be 3 of the most pressing needs of the City. The Library has been the topic of considerable discussion as well as the need to develop the park. The needed space in the complex is also well known. .,- The attached drawings are alternative ways of providing the needed room. We will have more definitive cost estimates far before the next meeting. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 D.Tc . 3/f • C : -4-, CoeCo ,IAcy 4 aid. r, or5 SKc}ck: T Ac1...;n; 5-\- + ;on- 5u, 1J ,nq 5 : -- - --- -- \ / \ \ i ?' J / � .► \\\ `°td:�,awz ,,�.... 4 a..- ,r;5'.a.-;J c. / B \I • , / •. ��• / --�f- lio 4 44/1 21.5' / / / / ' 1 ..-.. ‘ J 412.# '' .// '_ounc, 1 / court 28 : 104 / , 1-, / - _. r•.r\i -"* •+e1J / / / / / / / / ` 1//A Pre poSetj A.1,1i-.1-on. ( Alferrtia+G * 1.) �� - PryroSacl 1111;Fion. gynR..& '+t_ A.—C.4 (A wl = [ i 5' x 35') - ( 12'x IV) + ( 25'x 21.5 A = 2�'1 12.5 SF - 144 5.F• + 53'1.5 s.F Aria A,i.,•1 = 3)) O . S.F. A,-€ �yt.•z = [(11.5' x35') - (I2'x12')] = 2;112.5 5.F. ^ 144 S.P. , Ar%a Ai*. •2 = 2,5(. 8. 5 5 F, i , - - . - , I I .--I ..-4 , , I - i 1 I . P�, ,11c \14QrK5 I ER a inCel.;r. 0 / ?L...1j.nn / C...•..,-......4v Scry.ccs �?., Id : ,no, r ,...., i _ _ ___ ______ _____ __ _ _ __ _ . , ------- - ______ _ - - -- P,.61.c W ig orh9 / Ensceri/l9 --- - - _ • - -- s - //„" i // / /i / 23' 1 3 z' au.1C1,.,� ., / Cerr,•4,,i-�.) SerViccS I //l P.ropo5ccs) A citi i+i oR MIMS — XI S i Qu1 c.p :nJ C ~ A• eo._ = ( 301 x 4o' ) = 1600 5.F. • Ar•-ea. = 180o S. . 4 . I -- II I i ; e r --1 1 s 1 e • i • 7 t - . _ _ _.i . _ - . - --`-- -. i i • .. • _ - f _ - - - , t• - a . Qci 16 -uc••°ysy sv° t.p1 -3o ( Z ayit ,}- ° Z 0 L -21 lQ OW CAA i .L% G'U3 / s/� j0� -7 ' r%cj �Ii7a k2?j .L 7 AD Vsi • -4.,.-.J.,4,orr v ' r+ la°, } ,Pry r.s.8 eAd _ '-uo,+v ,odas b / M Z'°!+'PP�j �asod°�d _ i: AMMER ,t, 7.._ _ _ kaNte.11Mta- 6---‘41111------ _ Z1 ---- --�— - . • — 09 I— — -- -- — N -- ---- n P' r -- •• oU. II: , c :rtUc 1 °v;vvv L.d N..- ........ - f Amok PROPOSED COSTS: ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS: Area (Alt. #1) = 3,106 S.F. @ $35/S.F. = $108,710. ,.� Area (Alt. #2) = 2,568.5 S.F. @ $35/S.F. = $ 89,898. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING/BUILDING/COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDINGS: Area = 1,800 S.F. @ $35/S.F. _ $63,000. PLANNING/ZONING BUILDINGS: Relocate Public Works/Engineering Building (Adjoining) = $2,000 Relocate Public Works/Engineering Building (Separate) = $2,000 TOTAL COST W/ALTERNATIVE #1 (Administration Building): Building Cost = $108,710 + $63,000 + $2,000 = $173,710 Contingency Fee = $173,710 @ 10% = $ 17,371 Subtotal = $191,081 A/E Fee = $191,081 @ 10% = $ 19,108 ^ TOTAL = $210,189 TOTAL COST W/ALTERNATIVE #2 (Administration Building): Building Cost = $89,898 + $63,000 + $2,000 = $154,898 Contingency Fee = $154,898 @ 10% = $ 15,490 Subtotal = $170,388 A/E Fee = $170,388 @ 10% = $ 17,039 TOTAL = $187,427 . . wACHF✓G Otc "F i `L[1 %........„) fi. amity o pacI e e2unction '41RIZO• P March 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENTS - GAS TAX BONDS The attached information is the staff's best estimate as to the miles of street that could be paved if the voters were to approve the issuance of $1.5 million in Gas Tax Bonds. Gas Tax Bonds are permitted under Arizona law up to 50% of the yearly income from the State Gas Tax. Voter approval is required. There is no added cost to the community. The income from the gas tax is all that is needed to retire the bonds. The law also allows the bonds to be issued for up to 20 years, we are recommending 10. The City is currently realizing $649,000 from the Gas Tax. The remaining $400,000 would be used for maintence, as we are doing now. The program will not pave all of the dirt streets in the City, but it is the quickest way to pave almost one half; plus take care of a drainage problem Southeast of the dog track. The list of streets is advisory and is subject to your final approval . There would have to be a Council Resolution to place this on the ballot for the May election. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 411106. OM. `Oil a Apache c2unction INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 1984 TO: City Manager Tutu: Director of Public Works Operations Supervisor FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: HIGHWAY USER FUND BONDING PROGRAM The following improvements are proposed for a 10-year, $1.5 million bonding program with a principal and interest payment per year of $250,000 for the City of Apache Junction: 1) Hilton (Superstition to Broadway) 2) Starr (Superstition to Highway 60) 3) Junction ( Idaho to Goldfield) 4) Fourth (Highway 60 to Goldfield) 5) Tepee (Highway 88 to Starr) 6) Tepee (Meridian to Delaware) 7) Shiprock (Meridian to Main) 8) Roundup (Meridian to San Marcos) 9) Tomahawk (Superstition to Highway 88) 10) Scenic (Starr to Goldfield) 11) Lost Dutchman (Meridian to Idaho) 12) Southern (Meridian to Delaware) 13) Southern (Raindance to Cortez) 14) Cortez (Southern to Highway 60) 15) Goldfield (Lost Dutchman to Southern) 16) Palm Springs Mobile Home Park Subdivision (Mariposa Road - 19th to Southern and 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd - Tomahawk to Mariposa) 17) Superstition Estates Subdivision (Moreno Drive - 18th to 20th; Apache Drive Coconino Drive - 17th to 20th; Papage Drive - 16th to 20th; 18th - Plaza to Coconino and 17th - Plaza to Papago 18) Pinal Street Drainage Problem (Warner to Cedar & 4th to Broadway) • CITY MANAGER March 1, 1984 Page two Items numbered (1-17) are street improvements which include a 2 in. A.C. overlay on native material at a width of 24 ft. Item number (18) is a surface drainage improvement. k / i 1 d d d 1 11 d 11 I d d SI d d d li d d II 11 SI d d II d 11 11 •I at d Si d li d d d d ;I d 1 ri 11 Si ii 1 d 11 ri 11 11 !I 1 ! il ! 11 tOST OuTCHWAN J .T E LOST MOO." &VD ^..I._?_51_ 1. - • 1.4.... V 1-t— gi I A...... , .••••111._!.. i !I 11-,...- 1.• i I ••••••11 1 . .,,,,„,_ rr-- A . •••• . 1 I 1 0 1 let- ,.. i 1 il • g 8 • '1 . a - g ../..'' 'Il • 15 ' -""''• 17 ' . „,„ „ ii:,-.1.7,:, 16 ...._ . R 1 a i. • 1 •."'"" n.g. `1100-.....- I .0 "0.••• . ..... . 0 P. • • !. : ° 0 ; • ..'''..*' : 1 • 1 "..•2.60 p ... :.0•011N1111.11•11.1=ImmamaimamtaimmimihnimillimiliT ; e '''''' ' ; g •.-'-r•-•' 41 . .... ••••:. 3 • :IV" I' i— i 1 ,___I. •Wm.... * _.E...-..01SYSt.,. . , ......._ ! . .,,...,• , - ) . SUPERSTiTION !ROM I ir;:. E SuPtItsTITio !kV° IN ...• • 1 r . - ; ,•'•'• .1'.1 a l 1 gl ,,... 4 I II I i.....„ ...,;_...._. J....1..._1!.•••••,, _ . Mow 0 • mew,1 ...• •14.0•• 1 I i ,.9...-, •°1 : i 2, g ..., 19 _ • , ARACHE ..„ TRAIL .t.11 1 1:. e • . , 21 i • ! • 22 • ' ' ' -4 ft •. 8 ., .., I ' - -i . •_.1.. I 1 a .i i , .. ... • . •,. , _ . .: • •c ' • I •••• —.,•..... :Fitfi I ', ,, • ii x -A-----'-- -.11-1-ir , ',,, Nigill. , ,, ; r • ,_ . . 4° 4 •.,,, ,„ 01 Ant ..__,..,_ , W H.....i.VM 'ROADWAY ..! AI AVE ' „ BROAD*. AYI 0 •.... =•,.,-..,,-.• •. r-e.• g S I' : O.. e I •..,,,._t;•i: r,... ._i__::, ,. • -I. 0.60 F. •* • f' — g ,, , .... . ...._.,__.,. ; i i : 4..° i Te—e—:11 1 " i _J. 11—,C1._ht ,,,• t e •• x i . •• •• T ..., , T-L,- .— a - g.1 1,1 • • V V ..._ :',. •••• • I . . _— ___ ... .1 F... 30 1 • 29.; I, - - , .......t..9...2.___ . 27 ) ..,. , ; i• '" L-2.9. . . I +' ..."‘ 0.1. ! : .... .... _W...._ -=- r ••• j -1_!1•211•!!_M__._ 1 alwen on WII"! ./R•IWLI.ILAS... .11•111•111M11-." i •.0 ... •i f, _...._ . ...... ... ..:-. .. .-1 2•••1 --.t .. , U.M...6 "11. - ' .1 .1 .- :.... • '.. .' V ''' 1_ft:2, ... , -Lawn.ma , -„i - •••• . .... -.1-WOA, HO_ .. , . , SOUTHERN ARC .-- ..... I ...- --.6. - -E.., .1".-- i:•Wortrie." nua ?Lt.- 21.2 OFFICIAL .a......., STREET NAMING MAP -_ g APACHE JUNCTION, .— AItIZNA , ... 32 I -Mt- I AZIA___ 0••••••.•0_AL— 1 09 .1101- --- () er-d---•n•c..0 AtAa...2..,a.... u... SAR If — ——"'•-.1— . .'•— — — --I aa.ew -LW, It/•/Ai ORD NC NY TOWNSHIP I NORTH,RANGF El EAST, -t''I s;• SS OR 0 i.. GILA&SALT RIVER BASE El ! INL. I MERIDIAN, PINAL COUNTY ARIZONA1 I. RAIIISINE AvI ——————— -• ..— —..... ....• 0. .. I AV( ' ,.• i 1 0 0 0 '1 11 0 q 0 .1 0 0 Ifq ill il 01 ,1 61 4 Fi II d d !Id IIII 4 0 0 0 4 1 41 olio 0 0 I il H1110111 ,11111 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Total Bonding Amount = $ 1,500,000 Assume Interest ($1,000,000 @ 10%) = $ 100,000 Total $ 1,600,000 Bonding Consultant' s Fee = $ 100,000 Total $ 1,500,000 Pinal Street Drainage Project = $ 100,000 $ 1,400,000 TOTAL COST/MILE = $1,400,000 20 miles = $70,000/Mile Construction : (W/20% Contingencies) Jim's Estimate - $63,200/mile Nesbitt' s Estimate - $57,660/mile 24' Width (2"/Native) Bentson' s Estimate - $50,610/mile Nesbitt's Estimate - $49,827/mile 24' Width (2" Recycled/Native) Nesbitt' s Estimate - $70,406/mile 24' Width (3" Recycled/Native) Engineering: Rich's Estimate - $8,000/mile (Working Days) Jim's Estimate - $6,300/mile (10% of construction - consultants' PQACHF F� HA f \ V ' 'n Z ,,-;. ,..::ii,t4:4:2, gRizowk V it'i o 72t clie unction March 28, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBE F THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: MICHAEL McNULTY, CITY MANAGER '4%1 SUBJECT: BUILDING ADDITION - CITY HALL COMPLEX Attached is a memorandum outlining various cost options relative to adding additional space to the buildings in the City complex. I would like to recommend the following as the building program to be included in the over-ride election: 1 . Administration -ALT. #3 = $70,400 2. Public Works -ALT. #1 = 67,200 3. Planning -ALT. #2 = 40,200 4. Police -ALT. #1 = 21 ,600 Subtotal $199,200 Plus Contingency 10,800 Total $210,000 I am recommending Planning Alternative #2 because I do not believe that .0. the current structure will stand the remodeling that would be needed if another used building were attached. I feel that the added space will help to relieve the overcrowding that we are now experiencing. If you agree to this proposal , the total to be referred to the voters would be: _f Library $400,000 4- 43c�10o0-�►- c-rbk'�� :Yei Sl PI Park 300,000 Building Program 210,000 Total $941-0,000 MJMc/jtl 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 amity J7 c4pache ,Z INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: March 14, 1984 TO: City Manager THRU: FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Existing Building Expansion Attached are copies of alternative building expansion concepts. 1 . Administration/Magistrate/Council buildings 2. Public Works/Engineering/Building/Community Services buildings 3. Planning/Zoning building 4. Department of Public Safety building In the process of gathering information, I have discussed various aspects with the City Engineer, Building Official , Building Inspectors , Modular Building Systems contractors, Mobile Office dealers, a local architect and local contractors, (Earl Laabs, Harvey Long) . Estimated square footage costs for different building construction are: 1 . Mobile Office $25 s.f. 2. Modular Office $30 s.f. 3. Conventional construction $35 - $40 s.f. Note (1 ) : Building valuation data provided by the Building Department indicates conventional construction to be $39.29 s.f. for Arizona compared to the national average. In addition, local contractors feel that $35 s.f. would be low, as compared to $40 which may be high. Note (2) : For purposes of these estimates, $40 s.f. was used due to the custom modifications and other costs that would be incurred separate from the actual building costs. The summary of the estimated costs on page "7" outlines the various alternatives , as well as the total low and high estimated costs. -1- Meo to City Manager March 14, 1984 Page Two Once it is determined that funding will be available for building expansion, the following process could be followed• 1 . Staff prepares floor plan schematics, indicating space requirements for various personnel and tasks. 2. The Building Department prepares building specifications based upon #1 above. 3. Because of custom building connections, various roof line modifications, special footing and stemwall requirements, building plans should be prepared by an architectural firm, so that bids can be advertized. 4. Upon receiving bid proposals and awarding the project, the construction may begin. Please advise if additional information is required. RWB:sh -2- 0 CITY COMPLEX ADDITIONS FM ADMINISTRATION/MAGISTRATE/COUNCIL BUILDINGS i 35' ► I• 60' -I * I \14 i 1 / i �j Administration / 28. • �/\ i. -,i , I ; I si‘4 , a f ► ! L/ / i /0 _i_ 01 • 21.5. 4444 / i tjp& A / 1 1.‘•411/ i / , 4 o® Council/Court , 2b' r444; II j r . r ! ' / / / / / / / / r77/71 Proposed Addition (Alternate #1 ) /Ili Proposed Addition (Alternate #2) [MI Proposed Addition (Alternate #3) Alt #1 [ (77.5' x 35' ) - (12' x 12' ) + (25' x 21 .5' ) ] = 2,712.5 s.f. - 144 s.f. + 537.5 s.f. = 3,106 s.f. @ $40/s.f. = $124,240 Alt #2 [ (77.5' x 35' ) - (12' x 12' ) ] = 2,712.5 s.f. - 144 s.f. = 2,568.5 s.f. @ $40/s.f. = $102,740 Alt #3 [ (35' x 28' ) = 980 s.f. ] - Administration [ (35' x 28' ) = 980 s.f. ] - Council/Court = 1760 s.f. @ $40/s.f. = $70,400 PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING/BUILDING/COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDINGS N 1 _ 40 ✓_ Public Works/Engineering 14' - S'- J l / 2 3' ////:/ // // / // /// / / / ✓ / Building/Community Services ✓ / / ✓ / ✓ / / / t — Proposed Addition Alt #1 (28' x 60' ) = 1 ,680 s.f. @ $40/s.f. = $67,200 Alt #2 (24' x 60' ) = 1 ,440 s.f. @ $40/s.f. = $57,600 NOTE: Move PW/Engr Office for expansion/use by Planning Dept. OR sell on consignment/auction (estimated value of office + $10,000) "Milk Ink 111) N PLANNING/ZONING BUILDING r • i 7 7 7 Planning/Zoning ' 12• / i 1 1 1 -; rr 14' :::>Si>/ - Proposed Addition with 9' Separation `! - Proposed Addition with Adjoinment Move and relocate Public Works/Engineering mobile to one of the two locations shown above; OR replace with 28' x 60' Mobile (1680 s.f. ) and sell Planning Office on consignment or auction (estimated value + $10,000). Note: (1 ) Expansion of office by utilization of Public Works/Engineering office + $2,000 (2) Replace with 28' x 60' mobile office + $40,000 (3) Replace with 28' x 60' modular building + $50,400 6 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING �. r q5 ' .t,)' rc.2-\. .\%--\35\ 1 Go ' .35' Op Existing I Building N Alt #1 (12' x 45' ) = 540 s.f. @ $40/s.f. = $21 ,600 Alt #2 (12' x 35' ) = 420 s.f. @ $40/s.f. = @16,800 ... • SUMMARY ESTIMATED COSTS: A. ADMINISTRATION/MAGISTRATE/COUNCIL BUILDINGS: Alt. #1 = 3,106 S.F. @$40/S.F. = $124.240 Alt. #2 = 2,568.5 S.F. @S40/S.F. = $102,740 .-. Alt. #3 = 1 ,760 S.F. @$40/S.F. = $ 70,400 B. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING/BUILDING/COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDINGS: Alt. #1 = 1 ,680 S.F. @ $40/S.F. = $67,200 Alt. #2 = 1,440 S.F. @ $40/S.F. = $57,600 C. PLANNING/ZONING BUILDING: Alt. #1 = Relocate Public Works/Engineering Building (Adjoining) = $2,000 Alt. #2 = Relocate Public Works/Engineering Building (Separate) = $2,000 Alt. #3 = Replace existing office with 28 x 60 mobile office = $40,000 Alt. #4 = Replace existing office with 28 x 60 modular office = $50,400 D. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING Alt.#1 = 540 S.F. @ $40/S.F. = $21,600 Alt.#2 = 420 S.F. @ $40/S.F. = $16,800 LOW ESTIMATED COST HIGH ESTIMATED COST A = $70,400 (Alt. #3) A = $124,240 (Alt. #1) B = $57,600 (Alt. #2) B = $ 67,200 (Alt. #2) C = $ 2,000 (Alt. #1 or 2) C = $ 50,400 (Alt. #4) D = $16,800 (Alt. #2) D = $ 21,600 (Alt. #1) * TOTAL = $146,800 * $263,440 * NOTE: ITEMS (ESTIMATES) NOT INCLUDED: 1. Modifications to electric services (transformers; underground electric; 2. Modifications to telephone services. 3. Landscaping and irrigation replacement. 4. Sewer extensions or septic installations. 5. Water service extensions. 6. Architectural fees (6% of building costs) -7- . _ - 8 1 , ,QN 4L • - ' •i• I I c // •/'1 ;2 ) il 1 o 4cRATI4N5 0 i I cz I ‘,..) \ /4/7-ern/Yee) ' — // Ij;,i ' iC:..) 11(kti • k 1 , 1 1 ,, t,. �, " , --- Cold/W V/V / Y $ ewc&S 8U/L.D//Y DEP V cbq) r 1.,..Li ` 0t4 ' :: A j itiftnc ATE ,�' 1 ) l l l i l )1Tl ) i t ,' ,BOO i�'I O N Icti „4c,� I jay I _ .l= _�, C11111 Fit 1III ! 1 N...., i 1\if r‘"(: %.1,,, - .77.-r- — Vii- , . ..e2V/ c i-' ORA'S - _ //4-•rel t eiN .... .*" ),... , _ __F___ ._ _ \ • k , , . -) 6 _ III 1 ,11111 CH -/ PP /I / 4 C Ars el r6 7 Y tikoti N,.... �� ` - ,'\__H�tilt ! tt11 �''o Nc/� /�dIBE�P.S - j r (_,, c'�S TA- ..[.. t I / I >s1:46 i i ' ki 1 1 �\ �� S ,./ ! 11, ��, �� j, I Ctur) I -I' / / > i r. AC"E ✓G at 10 tm V;P�� qR� ' NP its o� ` pe�che unction zo March 27, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR A D MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK et/ SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-14 -- ORDERING OF ELECTION FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 35-452 and 35-453, the City Council must issue an order prior to conducting a bond election. This order must be issued not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the actual election. The attached resolution serves as this Council order and calls for the question to be placed on the May 15th special election ballot. The second page of the resolution (Exhibit A) is the actual form of the question as it will appear on the ballot and in the format as required by State law. This item will appear on the April 3rd agenda under public hearings and will appear immediately before the recess into the special .-., meeting for the purpose of voting on the second measure to appear on the ballot (one-time budget override) . kmc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 RESOLUTION NO 84-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, ORDERING AND CALLING A SPECIAL BOND ELECTION TO BE HELD IN AND FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON MAY 15, 1984 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, believe it to be in the best interest of the City to sell $1,500,000 principal amount of bonds of the City to include street improvement bonds; and - WHEREAS, it is necessary that the Mayor and Council submit the question of the issuance and sale of such bonds to the qualified electors of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I. A special bond election in the City of Apache Junction, Arizona is hereby called to be held on May 15, 1984, to submit to the qualified electors of the City Proposition 102 as shown on the form of ballot attached as Exhibit A which is a part of this Resolution. SECTION II The special election will be called and notice thereof given by posting a copy of this resolution in at least five public places in tthe City not less than twelve days prior to the date of election, by posting a copy at each polling place and by publishing a copy not less than once a week for three successive weeks in the Mesa Tribune, a ( newspaper of general circulation in the City. SECTION III: The City Clerk and other officers of the City are hereby 111 authorized and directed to do all things necessary or appropriate to the conduct of the election. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 1984. Wendell J Clarke Mayor Rw ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• David F Alexander City Attorney RESOLUTION NO 84-14 Page One of Two PROPOSITION 102 Shall the City of Apache Junction be authorized to issue and sell street improvement bonds of the City in the principal amount of $1,500,000 to provide funds to construct the streets of the City and to alleviate the Pinal Street drainage problem; the bonds to be issued in one or more series to bear interest at a rate of not to exceed r;L % per annum, in denominations of $1,000 or multiples thereof, with interest payable semiannually on the first day of January and the first day of July of each year and with principal payable not later than ten years from the date issued? FOR THE BONDS AGAINST THE BONDS / I RESOLUTION NO 84-14 Page Two of Two EXHIBIT A _. ..... (Li ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES I A. Y‘ 14 W L, ./ ` A V' D ej\ 1\6 A? C 3/9 ' \ \‘)/ ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: . "\tirlA Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS ii ' COUNCILrAI`! DAMIANO Ji COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR EIDSON . I COUNCI L�M,A�, TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILLi , . . MAYOR CLARKE UNANIP^.0 S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Adik. Ado • - -.";<wn ^e>..+[ `. •:ts .r.. 3 i- -5}a. ,`,� ,�„•7[- ,vti"xK4 .ty„.cam". -�.. tom,.-. • • • • c""• ..r.S�r w,' r.-",rs, rX7:' n ' '1'w•,,r a -..'.fi.fir-n. -,, `'cx_++-bz. v-�t': a:PyFi#�•' ;71Ry6�.�rc,.•e:.`a�".yr'�,.�s_+Asg'":: -'t+`�.l = 'ihG,��.�s-.'°+: . ` ` ' ITEM NO . 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT RESOLUTION NO . 84-14 , A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES , ARIZONA , ORDERING AND CALLING A SPECIAL BOND ELECTION TO BE HELD IN AND FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , ON MAY 15 , 1984 , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . AC"F ✓o Pe o ,_ ,. U , ,x ii 1Z A4P/ZONP cOity os pczc/2eunction Approver for Agenda /�C� March 27, 1984 at Item a Air, First Reading � Second Reading Public Hearing MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYO AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Old Business New Business THROUGH: CITY MANAGER �( _Consent Agenda FROM: CITY CLERKP/ 3Fc era I )Z+F P�tnc� SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-13 -- APPROVAL OF ONE- TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE PROPOSAL In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 41-563.01, the City Council must conduct two public hearings on a proposed one-time budget override. The first of these hearings was held at the regular Council meeting of March 20, 1984, and the second will be held on April 3rd. Immediately following the second public hearing, the Council must convene in a special meeting in order to conduct the vote on the proposed expenditure. If approved by Council , this measure will then be placed before the voters of the city at the May 15th special election. The attached resolution authorizes the measure to be placed on the ballot. In addition to a motion adopting the resolution, a second ..... motion will be necessary to specify the amount of the expenditure, the source of the funds, and the purposes for which the funds will be expended. In order to meet Statute requirements, it will be necessary to follow the following steps: 1. Recess the regular meeting immediately following the public hearings and adoption of the resolution on the street improvements bonds. 2. Convene the special meeting and vote on Resolution No. 84-13. 3. Adjourn the special meeting. 4. Reconvene the regular meeting and continue with the regular agenda. kmc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 RESOLUTION NO 84-13 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, PROPOSING A ONE- TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION. WHEREAS, the Arizona State Constitution permits the submission to rft, the voters of a city or town of a one-time budget override; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, after two public hearings, has determined that a one-time budget override is necessary for the City of Apache Junction; and WHEREAS, that a one-time budget override is in the best interest of the City of Apache Junction, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I That pursuant to the provisions of the Arizona Constitution, Article IX, Section 20, Subsection 2C, the following proposed one-time budget override is hereby referred to the qualified electors of the City of Apache Junction for approval or rejection at the Special Election to be held on May 15, 1984, which election is designated as the election at which the one-time budget override is to be voted on The proposed one- time budget override is to be numbered Proposition 101 and is as follows. PROPOSITION 101 THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL NOT AUTHORIZE EXPENDITURES OF LOCAL REVENUES IN EXCESS OF THE STATE-IMPOSED SPENDING LIMITATION EXCEPT UPON THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF AT LEAST TWO-THIRDS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND APPROVAL BY A MAJORITY OF THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY SUCH APPROVAL BY A MAJORITY OF THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS VOTING SHALL BE FOR A SPECIFIC AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION AND MUST OCCUR PRIOR TO THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE LIMIT IS TO BE EXCEEDED. SECTION II. That the proposed one-time budget override referred to in Section I hereof, is to be filed with the City Clerk to be placed on the election ballot for the City Special Election to be held May 15, 1984 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1984 WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk PROVED AS TO FORM A F ALEXAND City Attorney RESOLUTION NO 84-13 PAGE 1 OF 1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES q)j( ITET1 # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: trU YES NO ABSTAINED E MAYOR p 1 ► J NCILMAN. STEELSMITH I NCILMRM TAYLOR I H NCILMAN T( I _ COUNCILMAN SHANKS .COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE _ , UNANI,IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET I ol NOTES e e( i)t- p - Pj ITEM # UJ MEETING2� OF / t POTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN DAM IAN0 COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH I VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR I CO UNC I LMAN._ HILL J/ .MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"^.OLA , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL -, rAdm. Amw ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES of\ StelA( P ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: \A4SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS lit VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO s_COUNCILMAN STEELSNUT. _MAYOR__CLARKF UNAN "^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL IW ITEM NO . la BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT RESOLUTION NO . 83-13 , A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES , ARIZONA , PROPOSING A ONE-TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . ITEM NO . lb BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT EXPENDITURES i IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF lCjt. () 00L , FROM THE GENERAL FUND SURPLUS CREATED BY THE STATE SPENDING LIMITATION , BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS TO BE EXPENDED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER : CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW CITY LIBRARY $ f3 OI D O 0 INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF PROSPECTOR PARK $ 00 000 EXPANSION OF CITY HALL FACILITIES $ ZID � UC) � \\\\\ \ $ e \\\ /1111111/4 • ellNe r>; ITEM NO . 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE SPECIAL MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P . M . FRANK HAZE BURCH DANIEL CRACCHIOLO C MICHAEL PIERCE JAMES B CROOK JR STEPHEN E SILVER BRIAN KAVEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW ARDA S RUTHERFORD JACK DANIEL KLAUSNER P B U RC H 8 C RAC C H 10 LO, A JERRY L COCHRAN LUPE INIGUEZ-ESPINOZA BRAD 5 OSTROFF PHOENIX OFFICE 2333 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85004 1602)252 7701 ANDREW ABRAHAM ED WIN C BULL PHOENIX MAILING POST OFFICE BOX 13528 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85002 CATHERINE CONNER J LAWRENCE DUN LAVEY LINDA A FINNEGAN April 3 , 1984 JONES T JONES DARYL MANHART BRYAN F MURPHY IAN NEALE JOHN C B NITSCHE RICHARD A WHITE DAVID CRAIG WILSON Honorable Wendell J. Clarke Mayor of Apache Junction Apache Junction City Council c/o Mr. Michael McNulty City Manager 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Re: Quail Run Townhomes Dear Mayor Clark & Council Members : On Tuesday, April 3 , 1984 , you were to have a second reading of the rezoning application for the proposed develop- ment of Quail Run Townhomes located at the northwest corner of 16th Avenue and Winchester Road. I have unavoidably run into a conflict which prevents my attendance at the City Council hearing scheduled for April 3 , 1984. Since this vote is highly impor- tant to my clients , I would very much like to be in attendance at the time the vote is taken. Please accept this letter as our request for a continuance to your next available agenda for the second reading. It is my understanding that that would be the April 17 , 1984 agenda; however , if the Council has another date that they would prefer , we would be agreeable to any other date after April 17 , 1984 , if that were necessary. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours , Martin T. Jon MTJ/vlk � PQACHE✓Gin� ' s 6 • .O U • 2 gRiZo_} NP 'Oily 4 C ache �unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 12, 1984 Approver for Agenda ,t1"-e Date Ite # First Reading `_` ; Second Reading MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - Public Hearing Old Business THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ New Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR Consent Agenda PREPARED BY: } JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-32-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219) MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-32-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 219, is a request by the applicant Randall Industries to rezone their property from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development. The applicant is proposing an 81-lot townhouse project. The site is a vacant 10-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in Section 28. It is designated Low Density currently, and Medium Density at the time of pre-preliminary filing, on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile homes, houses, and apartments. Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments Two protest petitions were filed with the City. The signatures are those of Michael J. Schmidt whose property, within 150 feet, represents 50 percent of the area on one side, and the Bullards, Dunnagans, and the L'Odenses whose property represents 100 percent along the front. These are, therefore, valid protest petitions. In order to receive approval of this project, the City Council must approve it by a three-fourths vote. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 RESOLUTION NO 84-13 - A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY . APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, PROPO NG A ONE- TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION WHEREAS, the Arizona State Constitution permits he submission to - - the voters of a city or town of a one-time budget over ide, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of A•.che Junction, after two public hearings, has determined that a one-t• e budget override is necessary for the City of Apache Junction, and WHEREAS, that a one-time budget over-ide is in the best interest of the City of Apache Junction; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED : THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF - THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ' FOLLOWS SECTION I That pursuant to the pr.visions of the Arizona Constitution, Article IX, Section 20, Subsection C, the following proposed one-time budget override is hereby referre% to the qualified electors of the City of Apache Junction for approval .r rejection at the Special Election to be held on May 15, 1984, which -lection is designated as the election at which the one-time budget ove ride is to be voted on. The proposed one- time budget override is to numbered Proposition 101 and is as follows. PROPOSITION 101 THE CITY COUNC SHALL NOT AUTHORIZE EXPENDITURES OF LOCAL REVENUES IN E ESS OF THE STATE-IMPOSED SPENDING LIMITATION EXCEPT UPON E AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF AT LEAST TWO-THIRDS OF THE MEMBERS IF THE CITY COUNCIL AND APPROVAL BY A MAJORITY OF THE QUA IFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY SUCH APP'OVAL BY A MAJORITY OF THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS VOTING SHALL : FOR A SPECIFIC AMOUNT IN EXCESS OF THE EXPENDITURE LIMIT! ION AND MUST OCCUR PRIOR TO THE FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE IMIT IS TO BE EXCEEDED. SECTION I : That the proposed one-time budget override referred to in Section hereof, is to be filed with the City Clerk to be placed on the el_ tion ballot for the City Special Election to be held May 15, 1984. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AP' HE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1984. n , + rnr ': r xs a WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk PROVED AS TO FORM: A F. ALEXAND City Attorney RESOLUTION NO 84-13 PAGE 1 OF 1 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219) March 12, 1984 Page Two The companion preliminary plat (SD-5-83) was approved by the Subdivision Committee on January 19, 1984. If a decision is made to approve the proposal , the Council must find that this Planned Development complies with all six criteria set forth in Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. Final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways. The earlier drawings submitted by the applicant proposed a design that did not meet the intent of the Planned Development Ordinance which is to encourage creative design, diversify the relationship of various uses, structures, and spaces to counteract the effects of monotony. The site plan gave a strong linear and monotonous character to the development. The perspective renderings did not show the diversification of spatial relationships and the quality detail work found in the Sutton Place project which was to be the model for this project. A new set of revised architectural drawings showing a far better design was presented at the Commission hearing. There will be a few minor changes required to the preliminary Planned Development site plan if the City Council approves the project. City Engineering and Fire Department stipulations will be recommended before approval is given by the City Council . Of particular concern in this project and others is the proposal for a perimeter wall . Such walls are often five to six feet high running parallel to the street and intended to give the future occupants a measure of privacy and sound attenuation. Unless the linear pattern of such walls is broken up by recessing some sections of the wall and alternating the heights, a monotonous character and "tunnel " effect to the City' s overall urban landscape is gradually created. Therefore, it is the planning staff's recommendation to also include a stipulation that the perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals, that the wall heights vary from 3.5 feet to 6 feet, and that landscaping along the street frontages consist of naturalizing or native vegetation such as Palo Verde trees, Ocotillos, palm trees, barrel and Saguaro cacti . The current General Plan designation is Low Density. The designation was Medium Density at the time the applicant submitted pre-preliminary Planned Development plans and the proposal conforms to the Medium Density designation. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Polomskey/Vehon 4-3-0) The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219) March 12, 1984 Page Three "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case No. PZ-32-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 219, application of Randall Industries for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and Fire Department. 2. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide. 3. The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits. "The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . The request conforms to the General Plan. 2. The request conforms to Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. It is the highest and best use of the land." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas - "Yr'..h:k'v.,.".f� 1"1.:�' iis•!t y(.�Yy'�.?l?� i*-.'eZ RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 219 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-32-83 application of Randall Industries ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 219 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHF JUNCTION_ PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION. ARI7ONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS __ PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. 1. The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and Fire Department. 2. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide 3. The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned lDevelopment approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. That the perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals. and that wall heights vary from 3 5 feet to 6 feet. 5. Landscaping along the street frnntaces rnnsist of natt,rali7in0 or native vegetation such as Palo Verde trees (lrntillns palm trees, Barrel and Saguaro cacti. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) • c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) • _ F r APPLICATION FOR AMENS 1IIVT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ro g�7 3V ° " 'tom T Cash Receipt No ?O l 62 Amount ZS�O' Date`I-ZZ Case Number �� 3 Z- g - '' TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL. I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning - regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as Follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel nunbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed) Parcel 1 Frpm• _GR ' I To• CR-S / Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28. T.1N , R.8E. , PINAL COUNTY, Az - - The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance rf om nearest mapped street) 10.0074 ACRES ± NORTHWEST OF 16TH AVENUE & WINCHESTFR r. - • = (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate y _d signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting? DOES NOT REFLECT HIGHEST ANn RFCT USE • o- `.q' INl�J.�S..- R�3vA..�.p •l 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining 44 property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer $ AREA DEVELOPING INTO A RESIDENTIAL/URBAN COMPLEX 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the camunity or neighborhood, as the case may be? • Explain N/A 4 Other reasons for the subject request. Page 1 of 2 pages 4, Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and • structures EXISTING - VACANT LAND • PROPOSED - 81 TOWNHOMES WITH RrCREATIONAL COMMON AREA Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit same in erson to. Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the aopli- <_r-; -= cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apoly for this - change of zoning) 45/i/fnrc ha✓ra/caie. PD/fox z4' 4-Pre; Az.(s282 (o2) 819-o/73 (Ni or applicant or representative) Address) (Phone) (Nam of applicant or representative) (AdTress) (Phone) (Name & Address of person to wham petition & notices should be mailed) ��'.1 /'1✓ 2 /f03 //(Sigr/turerot applicant) (Date) • - Note Plans are required when application is filed for following Special Use `•` Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c a _ DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Dive :ion & Traci No Appli.c-it icon rec•rcvc•d by NovRemarks • • 2 2 1983 • • • • DEN. CP ,CANNING is - • Page 2 of 2 pages ORDINANCE NO 219 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL 1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as. The Southeast ,'- of the Southwest ; of the Northwest ; of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development - 2. The approval of the zoning district classification incorporates, by reference, the preliminary approval of the Planned Development, including all materials and documents as submitted by the applicant, and the development of said property shall be in accordance with • .-= said Planned Development application conditions, provisions, and stipulations, and as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance The application includes the "Agreement for Maintenance of Landscaping Within City Rights-of-Way," if executed as part of this application 3 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, fire hydrants as per approved plans of the Apache Junction Fire District for this Planned Development 4 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, off-site street improvements and street lights as set forth on the Planned _ Development plans in compliance with design details approved by the Director of Public Works SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ;.ik Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly - City Clerk =~ =~ ORDINANCE NO 219 PAGE TWO ' � ' APPROVED AS TO FORM ' — . ` D&vl"F Alexan — city torney ^ ` | | � ' ems PZ-32-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 219) a PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-S/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT `l 1 LIMITS OF ZONING DISTRICT (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL) - ---_ _ - .. . O 1letiese 1 _ CR-1 IE. FRED AVE. ® ® 1.�®'. I . 1 o ( ,e 0 O 33 1 CR-5/P Q E. FRIAR AVE. �j ® . ® SUBJECT SITE �r ,® :! : (CR1toCR5/PD) 1 110 351 L ,,, - , 2,. e_l_______ =v21 47110 CO OD 1 EAST 16TH AVENUE E 1iQ.n.O. P L , ' , -.' (3 0 5 5 CD 14 13 12+ s4 '+`, - 1 LK- ,- !E. LI-M A AV1 OCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-04- M1 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-03- - N SCALE: 1"=200` ii0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-26- (D COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-05- , ,,L:. .vtli.,.•,4,,. !' ; • -. .v,:t. , , 4.,i ,i•'. ,•..,. r„ -,1 •,, .:-. . .. , il • , '' `I; ' ' ' ;;' • . -.. 4 • 1, ' ' 'il ' i'•`I 1t1'4 1:.- ;t•., ',••••.. ' . s , • , : '.. , ,. i , il • ' , A.f i:4 ' •• .,. ..i,Pt ' • 0, ,.1,1.':.,Z.,•\.:',.', ,' 4...:.,,,..., ' 't •••• ' ' • :',... t P "‘i ... • • , *••, ' ,., • ••• ' (•,:,...., . ••"4,t.:41‘,41.,,,i. ... .f..,,.,.,..,'••I.,,•. •, . ._ .,`..:•.‘ „ ,.,../•i , ,;,,, • , ,` , , • .. ,. .,i ' f •• ..,'• * A I r ) i . f;1,^,••1 off:.'.'••;•.., r, ..1,,..;,. . , ‘, ,, . , , ...i , i , ,...,.., ,. „.. • „ •., ,•, ., tit:,;,• i e ;••k .. I • 1 1.; . '. .r 3 ' i. ''s- , ', ' ,I I•i..:-•i ' . . t, , ' ' . ' ' ..; ' ' 11 1 I • ''' ' ''''se l''..•' '. ! ' i. .), .•1 ' .4 • , : ' , ' k ;14, •''' ',6 , .', , • ' -• '',4 "''',' , ••'• ''''''''' ' '.- . •I' 11 Y. l'.; .., .` ' 1 ' '. .',':-.-r - • , ,,-, 1, ' ' , ,..11 ...tii k- , 14; • ,, . . ., • ,, 4 '" * ' "',.. '. 0 ' . ' ',!' ' • i I . ' t, '''• 9 , . a. , I , , . . . V.- .1 i.•, :.:. _a. , .. , . . i, - /°Vie r in\ ) 0 1 — -43? ....(r , . • 1 7.--- ••=---" ,-7;k'f.....-----' I r 4 (,. /0 ,/ i 11, .... „ i--„,1 _ ,.., -„_----- ..a "),,'m — , - . _...„,- iie 1 '--. .'.. f ---....--- " ....„ ...;/o, ,f?,,,, 4Cas •1 0 • aio rr.ii$N) ...-1..,(%t•fi,o‘k. i V ..../ 4.4,..,:e. I r ... \''.-•'.1 24:, „ IV '.." V .3. ..., ,1,4,• '.' • 4,1144,4 WO S . k ., .,„,.*' , ;;(1,4-461,-'•! • I/., ,_','.... :4‘,......,:- \ 41, r u, ' Q.. • As ';''''.41.7e'lfj; '">VL.;•••:' ,. Aftlf;T:11,1,';'."' ,', , 1$* I.,. a , .- ,E,0.. 4 . ...0". rii,..f . ) ',%,1 . • -jg. -0 1"4 '* NJ"' ',' : w:i ` • -.............. • ,p0,....., '-, ,• •••41"000111',,1••' i• ' le.',.•-•41,' •;..iir •• 4 1/614.'1%,.: •t"4.Z.Z:•,-Zi•Z..:.• . .1}4Cfr,r- t .... ).• 1'11 • fi. .2•••li-4:•:','.•,'•;:r.-:‘,Z;••• 1 '4'24-, •. •,4t• ,A.-pri- f,114-1;'--- -r-...:,„Arrtite..-„, . i Ai* .. 41 -1.7vie. ic., ' • f ••• ,. -,14.---- -, a Nell-T-', It S'.----- •-•:-.X.V.;77-- -, ' •T:',' i',1-"r,', : . .W..--1.!!!!!! .....-.4„,c;-d. .1:,:.., 1. 1 •-#. .."...-,st!..1. , ,, • viol i •%, s• -• •,•••,,- ...'""""'"IV.' •••141;;N‘'/1,' ''''' ...A.•.0• 1 '-." -•-• •-'.,!l il,"".-••••A_S°,1,1 i ' f • :1., , •t:.•%/;$11, •/, li:- A '• i, • b;t144f‘ec.41'Irti'-‘ps' - ...- - r;e013,i'.' v.l' ''',!',(....or.-..:::"....:`'iir:',,Ar ..1....,4. • . I'm..11-.4''''',- ---i•-‘24----,,i-• '-'.''••••lia,i,„.., •••,- ;. ....... - ,..;...b. 4, I X/ ..1 T 1,,:',„.7.4% , ..1 0,A ....i1:7*.r., ,..• •..• • : ':' . - t ---.:` . ,.-- . ,,, •/./.4• S ,,.,..... ,4•5,;;,(..,"..;'1::, ,.:, , p,1,1,6. . . ,...,..... 1 ' . ..., : , , ,,,,,,t,,,;.44pOtPri}.1071111, ...4 111111,111wi,-.:, .f, 4,,e, „ ,.. • ,./ . 1 '. s . . e .. ....j I a. -.... ,o_mos:,!! •,,, 41,0, .. •.,,,: i AN ., ,4. ., , , „ ! . • .011,141.44+tr .'.•••.,-,',.• ., . . ., ' N ., ;,it •h.t..i 1,.i.:::,,.•••,• ir,„ ,,,,,•1•4; *. .: -' ,.. •:••• ''" ' ' '• ' ' '''''-. : -"till'-4'... 1/. I: . - I _____....:-.... ' •:. (...,‘ ' • '' s ' .' - SI :- L-Ji''' - ' 'IIP,''' •• •::•-•••• -'• 1 ,,:•.•r.' I., ‘:".. • . • I .. • '. t .. ••••-.- . , ..,••••:-..1. 4,f, .•.'" 7; " "• ,,- . : • ' %;°,'••.• ,N I 4 . •Wilge‘'..- • PIMA, — '.L • ..t. '- .1 4.. .. 4.4 •"' . •"1,7' • ;••;,:: '• .eo'• • •. ;.,..:,....) ---. i /4...) - t,\0.44- r- IL. _ - .• , •.: ••• : •A__ 1 } --..."-i- A•ft C ir -- t"tiltz--, V;;;, ),*.1 ,::,..•:;-,,, - •. ,. \\.1 P, .4 1.•t :...i....l • 1. I.' '....." -*00 • ',./..,,..%.•. S•••••••lir , 4184.oiLimr, ...."..(c,,,,,,,4,,, -A, '. .1::.17,,„Tir..-..,. ,....: _t4. ...., ,....... , v 4.7 , , .4,41114b01)AS/• ______----•---- , ,Niro.: . .. • .01.,, .m.,,,ia•a ,... ••4'' c.,• lti„..S.:'.7 .,„„ ef"7!....1 . ,t•••%,"' ""t"............. . 4"....t4%:'i r . .,. ,...?•%, 1•••agni. ....- ' '11 tA.;: 'd/f1"•••• 1 ''' 0 s 40*;.;.".•,. /11‘67)9,Of ''' 4'0 t(1,q11Vit •1 •I i • \\0,1 Nal* r, -,'..- __ ----- k AV ..•••••'Si,\ ..• 40r .. ' ' it \ &A i' • ‘ail • - •-!... Nili‘11,. AV.d.‘•- • .. , . ),,, ..f7,4•116 al.":i,4„..........a. ...441... . -4W4,.. , 1, ..,..,„r. . , F 6 .-, • i 1 J Quail . ...... :i S treetsc ape Run Townhomes PZ-32-83 -.• • - , igA ,•gib PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PZ-32-83 Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen originated petition. We, the undersicned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby PROTEST the proposed rezoninc of properties described as: The southeast h of the southwest 4 of the northwest of section 2P, Township 1 north, ranee 8 east, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in. Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. REASONS TC PROTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FOLLONS: 1 . Proposed planning and zoninc change FZ-32-83 should not have been Granted a public hearing because: a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the Zoning Ordinance. b. You are bypassing the citizens rightts by disregarding the petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification of property. 2. We don't want the higher density which will be a 400% increase Ei units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1. 3. Increased traffic. 4. Additional noise. 5. This 10 acres which is a part of 80 acres bounded by Broadway on the north, Winches .er on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho the west has been CR-1 since 1974. People have bought land and built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential zoning. err 6. We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to des`trory t e' established economic or social uses of adjacent or surrounding properties. 7.Is a neighborhood area and should not be split up. FEB 8 i98 8. Is the only CR-1 south of US 60 privately owned in the,--city.P�'�'�,�'�G There is a need for such a parcel. 9. We represent of the property owners bounding on one side of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 300 ' . AIME DESCRIi)TION OF PROPERTY cL� DATE t A q- /)A't-f6d/tef 3 7 7DES411C- ;0, 7s G% �37 7, /%fsZ /1Ze ► 43/ ` . /6r4 41e 44‘1,‘ -Tr 4e5 2', /914/1 PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHIN E PZ-32-83 Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen originated petition. We, the undersigned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby PROTEST the proposed rezoninc of properties described as: The southeast 1 of the southwest 1 of the northwest I of section 2P, Township 1 north, range 8 east, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Final County, Arizona. REASONS TO PROTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FCLLOWS: 1 . Proposed planning and zoninc chance FZ-32-83 should not have been granted a public hearinc because: a. Only two sicnatures of the six affected owners were obtained for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the Zoninc Ordinance. b. You are bypassing the citizens rights by disregarding the petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification of property. 2. We don't want the hicher density which will be a 400% increase el units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1. 3. Increased traffic. 4. Additional noise. 5. This 10 acres which is a part of 80 acres bounded by Broadway on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho the west has been CR-1 since 1974. People have bought land and built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential zoninc. 6. We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to destroy the established economic or social uses of adjacent or surrounding,, r •. properties. e:' : :�,� Ate'" 7.Is a neiahborhood area and should not be split up. r 6 ; i�a4 8. Is the only CR-i south of US 60 privately owned in the city. There is a need for such a parcel. 9. We represent 66% of the property owners bounding on one side of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 150' . :AME _ DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY DATE :_/,_ „0:73L,/r OR ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING at the West quarter corner of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona; thence East (assumed bearing) along the southerly line of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the North- west quarter of the said Section 28, a distance of 660.64 feet to a point, said point being the Southeast corner of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the said Section 28; thence North 0° 04 ' 45" East along the easterly line of the said South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of 40.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence West along a line being parallel with and 40.00 feet northerly of the said southerly line of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of 181.84 feet; thence North 0° 05' 23" East, a distance of 48.82 feet to a point marking the beginning of a curve to the Right and having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence along the arc of the said curve through a central angle of 41° 24 ' 35", a distance of 36.14 feet to a point marking the beginning of a reverse curve to the Left having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence along the arc of the said curve through the arc of the said curve through a central angle of 167° 23' 52", a distance of 146.09 feet; thence North 35° 53' 55" West 165.77 feet to a point on the northerly line of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest parter of the North- west quarter of the said Section 28; thence North 89 59' 45" East along the northerly line of the said South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of 333.58 feet to the Northeast corner of the said South half of the South- west quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28; thence South 0° 04' 45" West 289.81 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PZ-32-83 Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen originated petition. We, the undersigned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby PROTEST the proposed rezonino of properties described as: The southeast ;b of the southwest < of the northwest of section 28, Township 1 north, range 8 east, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. REASONS TO PROTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Proposed planning and zoninc change FZ-32-83 should not have been granted a public hearing because: a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the Zoning Ordinance. b. You are bypassing the citizens rightts by disregarding the petition and consent method for brinoing up reclassification of property. 2. We don't want the higher density which will be a 400% increase 81 units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1. 3 . Increased traffic. 4. Additional noise. 5. This 10 acres which is a part of 80 acres bounded by Broadway on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho the west has been CR-1 since 1974. People have bought land and built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential zoning. 6 . We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to destroy the established economic or social uses of adjacent or surrounding properties. 7.Is a neighborhood area and should not be split up. 8. Is the only CR-i south of US 60 privately owned in the city. There is a need for such a parcel . 9. We represent 66% of the property owners bounding on one side of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 150' . ARMS DESCRIi3TION OF PROPERTY DATE 4 OR ADDRESS- , 77/6-6- Xr/ { /��5%-d J � _ iiriew 7- 7— f ' lap,CHE ,, 20 o czc/ze unction March 14, 1984 TO: City Manager /7--,a) FROM: Building Official RE: Building Code Amendments Proposed ordinance 269 is to modify the 1982 Uniform Building Code to be consistent with the changes made to the 1979 Uniform Building Code with the exception of the proposed change to Section 305. (a), which will require a survey on all lots to verify the building location. LF:sw Approver for Agenda Oat Item # First Reading '3l` rY lc Second Reacting 1,?I5 /b PubIt Hearing Oldu'usiness New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ORDINANCE NO. 269 • - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REVISING SECTION 304 (a) PERMIT FEES, SECTION 305.(a) GENERAL AND TABLE 3-A OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1982 EDITION REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND • PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. A • • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL ...:.Ai':-lsi.ii:+.a.vi>-.:���-_•gin:.=. _ _. v ` • That Section 304.(a) is amended by adding the following: 1. The building official may waive the fee for reconstruction or repair of any residence damaged by natural calamity, such as, but not limited to, fire, flood, tornado, strong winds That Section 305 (a) General is amended to read as follows. All construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the building official, and certain types of construc- tion shall have continuous inspection by special inspectors as specified in Section 306 A survey of the lot shall be required by the building official to verify that the structure is located in accordance with the approved plans. It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to be accessi- ble and exposed for inspection purposes Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection That TABLE 3-A - Building Permit Fees is amended to read as follows TABLE NO 3-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $700.00 No Charge $701 00 to $2,000.00 $10.00 plus $1 50 for each additional $100 00 or fraction thereof over $701.00 to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $32.50 for the first $2,000 00 plus $6 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including .:� $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000 00 $170.50 for the first $25,000.00 plus ai $4 50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001 00 to $100,000.00 $283.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 00 $100,001.00 and up $433.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus • $2 50 for each additional $1,000 00 or fraction thereof • ORDINANCE NO. 269 Page One of Two Ordinance No 269 Page 2 Other Inspections and Fees M1 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $15 00 per hour - 2. Reinspection fee assessed under __ ._ provisions of Section 305(h) 15 00 each - _ 3. Inspections for which no fee it specifically indicated.. ... $15.00 per hour - 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revi- sions to approved plans $15 00 per hour (minimum charge--one-half hour) SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY t $s If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1984. Wendell Clarke Mayor c _ ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Ci'ty orn II I CHF ✓G U ,,. + - .Z it t,I , 'IP/ZOt,P (sly (15 &ipache unction March 28, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYO -AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER % 11'61 FROM: CITY CLERK ,�'/ SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF BOND ADVISOR As authorized by the City Council at the March 21st special meeting, bond advisors will be invited to attend the April 2nd work session in order to make presentations to the Council regarding their services. The selection of a bond advisor will appear as an item on the April 3rd agenda. A suggested motion is attached for your consideration. The details for the motion will not be available until after the work session presentations. kmc Approver for Agenda ato Item i First Reading "? /W // Second Reading - Pubic Hearing - Old Business - New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 r.CHFJ� ;!:"its C/,L ,, „.., ., ,, , „...,,, ,,,,,,,t4,t,,,, �R NP CO it y o Apache unction izo March 19, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYO AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER 11 r FROM: CITY CLERK J / SUBJECT: CITY BOARD OF HEALTH APPOINTMENTS -- AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 3, 1984 In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 36-165, "The mayor of each incorporated city shall , at the first meeting of the governing body in April of each year, appoint two members of the governing body who, with the city engineer and the city health officer shall constitute the city board of health." Councilman Shanks and Councilman Hill were appointed to serve as the Council representatives on the city board of health in April , 1983. City Engineer Jim Bakkedahl and Dr. Dean Seeman are the remaining members of the board. A motion is attached for your consideration. kmc Approver for Agenda , i �,�e`/ Item # First Reading yl'��Kc_ ,a Second Reading - Public Hearing - Old Business , New Business __._ Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQp,CHE e f ,,tt 4j/4 S �1 (l tyres sc ,ju�''+A e4i�. qR/ZONP COit y O75 L IJac`2eunction March 27, 1984 Approver for Agenda Item # First F--,,,,ding _l;ctL 1.� MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY QUNCIL Soccr-, Reedinc THROUGH: CITY MANAGER /` J --- Pub c bearing / Old Business FROM: 5OMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT ✓New Business Consent Agenda SUBJECT: SWIMMING POOL FEES The Parks & Recreation Commission at their regular meeting on March 26, 1984 recommended the following fee schedule be established for use of the new community swimming facility. Daily Fees 18 & over 13 thru 17 12 & under .75 .50 .25 Individual Season Pass 18 & over 13 thru 17 12 & under $25.00 $20,00 $15,00 Family Season Pass $45.00 Pool Rental (Private Party's) $25.00 per hour The Commission feels these fees are comparable to what other communities charge (see attached) , but feel they should be evaluated on an annual basis . Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. Pw 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Swimming Pool Fees City/Town Daily Fees Season Passes 18 & over 13 thru 17 12 & under Individual Family Casa Grande $1.00 .75 .50 0 $65.00 Chandler .75 .50 .25 15.00 40.00 Mesa .75 .50 .35 0 40.00 Tempe .50 .25 .25 0 (*35.00-50.00) Kearny .60 .50 .50 $20.00 45 00 *depends on family size PyACHF ✓G �' t � '_ 'L o� � n ~ t. .e 1ID , O-x � x .q� wi,� U aa:?, �li r t ; Z '1RrzoNP 'Oily o5 &7iache &unction March 27, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR & COUNCI h THROUGH: CITY MANAGER '� FROM: COMMUNITY SERVICES! SUPERINTENDENT ....- SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS As of April 1, 1984 the terms of Lois Broman, Ted Millspaugh, and Irene Wernett have expired from the Parks & Recreation Commission. At their regular meeting on March 26, 1984 it was decided only Irene Wernett 'would not continue to serve. A recommendation to the City Council was made to reappoint both Lois Broman and Ted Millspaugh to three year terms expiring on April 1, 1987. At this time there are no Talent Bank Applications on file to fill the vacant spot. Advertisements have gone out recently in the local papers soliciting interested individuals to serve on this commission. Hopefully you will be able to appoint this position in the near future. Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. pw Approver for Agenda /ee----1 14t/r((Q/ m Ite # 1 1i`.c..1:Pf ,,,,c haring ;J1 3usinesS u/ Ndw Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ..... __ r CNCt,.0 J 'l, 110s � it z anl"0 ache u;, ,i021 TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR l ar//s 4- ecrea /i'oy) BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 3/9? VS V NA E: J 0 {Y) P S A Pr/e 1^ TELEPHONE: 9A? - 74iyy (home) / J [j ,Q 3-a m.e. (of fic ADDRESS: 1�3/ ' 1/C'C1�'il� /7/J ZIP CODE: 5,�QRa C� • OCCUPATION. /104 .r e Wtir ha'Id (if retired, please /inndiccatte formerJ occupation or profession) EDUCATION: CO/br, e — a_� ��'/G// �J - `1/T/ e. -PS71L 471 Y, - IL-41. o;,)-ca/PYn ,Z- (, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COI.ZiUNITY ACTIVITIESC9G✓Drked t r,7 y2arx kii (p /774' r,, yet-akei]) p OQ\ravn1M1nq) Mai+,r\ahce1Le iahni�,r_� TTI i b v r �J / � // t CZ lit/or ed C{ �- 17'� ci.ct r€J 1 hCilleh. poo/ma;�,�*hand flkt(/ J f,l Te�� 7es7„ ,yq S ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. ,7ze ( 2lz Revised 6/19/S1 Siam re of Applicity -.rr". -;.--) COPY 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION A2IZONA 85220 • TF1 FP-4C (A.(-1-)N no, o nn-f CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 243, PZ-50-83, APPLI- CATION BY RICHARD A. AND GEORGIA ERICKSON TO RE- ZONE 1 . 5 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH SIDE OF EAST SECOND AVENUE BETWEEN HOPI AND ARIZONA ROADS IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOME- SITE ZONE (TH) , INCLUDING THE APPLICANT DEDICAT- ING THE WEST, NORTH, AND EAST THIRTY-THREE (33' ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES, B: ACCEPTANCE OF MIN- UTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1984, BE C.C. Posted 3/23/84 AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion Published 3/28 - 4/3/34 carried. ) Planning Letter sent to applicant 3/21/84. THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, AFTER DELETING ITEM NO. 9, MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ROADHAVEN PHASE I AND II. (motion carried. ) . C.C. Scheduled for 4/3/84 agenda THAT RESOLUTION NO. 83-63, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ENTITLED, "APACHE JUNCTION: 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN," ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 82-01 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 82-48 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED, "APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP," SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED "REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, C.C. Posted 3/26/84. DATED OCTOBER 31, 1983, " BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. (motion carried. ) Planning Land use Map revised. Lette send to Mr. Baljo. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 270, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 270, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE 9-2 RE- MOVAL OF LITTER, BY ADDING SECTION 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES AND SECTION 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN C.C. Posted 3/23/84 EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Published 3/28 - 4/3/84 (motion carried. ) P.W. Implemented by Building Division. THAT MRS. DOROTHY SANCHEZ BE RETAINED AS A TEMPO- RARY FULL-TIME LIBRARY CLERK FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTEEN WEEKS UNTIL THE END OF THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR ON JUNE 30, 1984. (motion carried. ) Personnel THAT NEILS DETROIT DIESEL BE AWARDED THE BID FOR PD-84-1, 35 KW EMERGENCY GENERATOR SET IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,841.00. (motion carried. ) P.S. Vendor notified - contract contract signed by City Cler THAT BRUCE BAUM & ASSOCIATES BE AWARDED THE BID FOR F-84-1, COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR THE IBM SYSTEM 34, IN THE AMOUNT OF $6725.00. (motion carried. ) :finance P.O. approved and mailed 3/22/84. ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATIONS OF ROSS GREVES, DAVID ALEXANDER, LARRY CLINE, ROGER SHORT, BOB BEESON, JAMES TUVELL, AND ANN LORENZO, FROM THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM, BE ACCEPTED WITH SPECIAL COMMENDATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION IN ITS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ARE HEREBY APPOINTED TO THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNI- TIES ACTION TEAM: LOCAL OFFICIAL CATEGORY APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT OR DESIGNEE, SANDY SMITH. FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CATEGORY SAVINGS AND LOAN, DAVID NICODEMUS. EDUCATORS CATEGORY CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE - APACHE JUNCTION CAMPUS, TOM HARPIN. APACHE JUNCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT, TOM JOHNSON. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CATEGORY TITLE INSURANCE, RUTH ABBOTT. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CATEGORY CONTRACTOR, TERRY SECOR. (motion carried. ) E.D.S. THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON MARCH 21, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 268 AND OTHER COUNCIL MATTERS. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON APRIL 3, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTE ON ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 3/28/84. THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 2, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 3 , 1984, AT 6:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 3/28/84. THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 9:25 P.M. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. ITEM NO . 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 219 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 219 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 219 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL : 1 . THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND FIRE DEPARTMENT . 2 . STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY DEVELOP- MENT GUIDE . 3 . THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS . 4 . THAT THE PERIMETER WALL BE RECESSED AT VARIOUS INTERVALS , AND THAT WALL HEIGHTS VARY FROM 3 . 5 FEET TO 6 FEET . 5 . LANDSCAPING ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGES CONSIST OF NATURALIZING OR NATIVE VEGETATION SUCH AS PALO VERDE TREE , OCOTILLOS , PALM TREES , BARREL AND SAGUARO CACTI . FOR APPROVAL a ITEM NO . 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 219 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry ; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 219 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . StsD 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 219 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL PQACHE dci41, �G ,•` : AIR/ZONP �D it y o, 9-i7 ac/e c 2unction March 14, 1984 TO: City Manager --- FROM: Building Official RE: Building Code Amendments Proposed ordinance 269 is to modify the 1982 Uniform Building Code to be consistent with the changes made to the 1979 Uniform Building Code with the exception of the proposed change to Section 305. (a), which will require a survey on all lots to verify the building location. LF:sw a , _W C — z --Se- ,� ,�j1-€ 7 /4-7' Approver for Agenda • loat7/ Item # First Reading ' /, /&Second Reading ,�/5 /� Public Hearing ,,.ZOld uusiness New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Am+ p ;., ORDINANCE NO 269 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REVISING SECTION • - 304.(a) PERMIT FEES, SECTION 305 (a) GENERAL AND TABLE 3-A OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1982 EDITION REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND - PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE "" ` = JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL That Section 304.(a) is amended by adding the following: -- - 1. The building official may waive the fee for reconstruction or repair of any residence damaged by natural calamity, such as, but not limited to, fire, flood, tornado, strong winds. That Section 305 (a) General is amended to read as follows: All construction or work for which a permit is required shall be - subject to inspection by the building official, and certain types of construc- - tion shall have continuous inspection by special inspectors as specified in Section 306 A survey of the lo 4116 be required by the building official to verify that the structure is lo . -d in accordance with the approved plans - . - It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to be accessi- ble and exposed for inspection purposes Neither the building official nor the "'` `_--` jurisdiction shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection That TABLE 3-A - Building Permit Fees is amended to read as follows [ TABLE NO 3-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES ' TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $700.00 No Charge $701 00 to $2,000.00 $10 00 plus $1 50 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof over $701 0O!", to and including $2,000 00 $2,001.00 to $25,000 00 $32 50 for the first $2,000.00 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 00 I : • . $25,001 00 to $50,000.00 $170.50 for the first $25,000 00 plus � `^�'" _ "�'` $4 50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 li $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $283 00 for the first $50,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 00 i $100,001 00 and up $433.00 for the first $100,000 00 plus $2.50 for each additional $1,000 00 or fraction thereof ORDINANCE NO. 269 Page One of Two • Ordinance No 269 Page 2 Other Inspections and Fees 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $15 00 per hour 2. Reinspection fee assessed under t.." �... .< provisions of Section 305(h) 15 00 each • 3. Inspections for which no fee it specifically indicated $15 00 per hour 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revi- sions to approved plans.. . $15 00 per hour (minimum charge--one-half hour) SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. EPASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1984. Wendell Clarke T - Mayor ATTEST- Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM- - , • I 4,1 City orn ... .. 3 ._ (liACH—E G S'R, A `q Ayk\ O 1. U ,' Z v ,5` ` C 'it/ o f c padre C unction March 14, 1984 TO: City Manager /--,40 FROM: Building Official RE: Building Code Amendments Proposed ordinance 269 is to modify the 1982 Uniform Building Code to be consistent with the changes made to the 1979 Uniform Building Code with the exception of the proposed change to Section 305. (a), which will require a survey on all lots to verify the building location. LF:sw ,... Approver for Agenda Dat Item #3 First Reading Second Reading lb Publi3 Hearing ,.,,, Old uusiness New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ORDINANCE NO. 269 E AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REVISING SECTION 304 (a) PERMIT FEES, SECTION 305 (a) GENERAL AND TABLE 3-A OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1982 EDITION. REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL That Section 304 (a) is amended by adding the following 1. The building official may waive the fee for reconstruction or repair of any residence damaged by natural calamity, such as, but not limited to, fire, flood, tornado, strong winds. That Section 305 (a) General is amended to read as follows: All construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the building official, and certain types of construc- tion shall have continuous inspection by special inspectors as specified in Section 306. A survey of the lot shall be required by the building official to verify that the structure is located in accordance with the approved plans It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to be accessi- ble and exposed for inspection purposes. Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection. That TABLE 3-A - Building Permit Fees is amended to read as follows. tl TABLE NO. 3-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $700.00 No Charge $701 00 to $2,000 00 $10.00 plus $1.50 for each additional $100 00 or fraction thereof over $701 00 to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $32 50 for the first $2,000 00 plus $6 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001 00 to $50,000 00 $170.50 for the first $25,000.00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $283 00 for the first $50,000 00 plus $3 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001 00 and up $433 00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $2.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or x fraction thereof • 3 ORDINANCE NO. 269 Page One of Two Ordinance No. 269 Page 2 Other Inspections and Fees 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours.. $15 00 per hour 2. Reinspection fee assessed under provisions of Section 305(h) 15 00 each 3. Inspections for which no fee it specifically indicated .. $15.00 per hour 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revi- sions to approved plans. $15.00 per hour (minimum charge--one-half hour) SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY Wit}"' If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1984 Wendell Clarke y - Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City orn 43TRu1TTA). ris • Civil Engineering, Surveying& Planning HOWARD R.STANDAGE,P E DARRELL D TRUITT, P E Q 11611117 PETER L PETERSON, P E z to, March 27, 1984 The Honorable Mayor Wendall Clark City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Re: Required Surveys for Home Constructions Dear Mayor Clark: I have been approached by several people in the construction industry regarding the proposed City Ordinance that would revise the Uniform Building Code and require the building officials to have a survey stamped by a registered land surveyor prior to approving the footings of a structure. The way I understand it, the surveyor would survey the lot, set the pins ( if needed) , stake the footings and certify to the location of said footings. Including a drawing illustrating the same, this would run $700.00 or more. These costs are reasonable for the effort expended and the liability incurred by the land surveyor. I felt that you should have this information prior to making final judgement on the ordinance. It is my understanding that Apache Junction had approximately six instances over the past four years where buildings have been placed in the wrong locations on a lot and encroach into the setbacks. This does not surprise me. Errors will be made in a minor percentage of all construction where there is the human factor involved. It is the case in all jurisdictions that I know of. However, none of the jurisdictions that I am familiar with require a survey as the City of Apache Junction is contemplating. Their action is either to require removal of the footing , or to grant a variance. A variance is usually granted if the mislocation was unintentional and the encroachment into the setback is such that it warrants a variance. This is the policy I would recommend on behalf of the City of Apache Junction. 2830 E BROWN RD —SUITE 17 • MESA, AR IZONA 85203 • PHONE (602) 830-3700 1141 E COOLEY —SUITE G • P 0 BOX 1266 • SHOW LOW, AR IZONA 85901 • PHONE (602) 537 5258 I spoke briefly with Leo Frazier. He was under the opinion that the City did not have the authority to grant a variance that was imposed by the developer. This is exactly the way the City of Mesa 's Code reads. Yet, these types of variances are granted on specific occasions. It is my opinion that the Code is intended to mean that the City shall not grant planned variances. For instance, if a developer was to come in ahead of time, as part of his site plan approval or his building permit process, and show a three foot encroachment into the setback lines, the City would not grant such a variance as it was an imposed variance by the developer. We would urge the City of Apache Junction to carefully consider this ordinance. I understand the City's concern regarding this issue. I think they should be equally concerned with adding an additional $700.00 cost to the price of a new home and additional delays in the building and approval process. We appreciate your consideration of our opinion. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Yours truly, 1� , Darrell D. Truitt, P.E. xc: City Council City Manager Leo Frazier ROLL CALL VOTE SHE J NOTES Uf r` o ITEf1 # MEETING OF PLOT I ON BY: 11 SECONDED BY : (j1D1/1 YE NO ABSTAINED r.OHNCI1 MANII\MIANO COUNCILMAN HILL COUNC LL M - TAYLOR _.C_O U_NC TM ,SHANKS JUT MAYOR EIDSON _COUNCILMAN._ STFF1 SMITH MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: EV SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH �,OUN�C I SHANKS � V... LM.Al COUNCILMAN HILL COUNC I Lr1AN TAYLORiv- 4 COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"IOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE AET NOTES '11/ PI/ (, b ..... /15/ JI/1 qou PY v - ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : -1111111 Y ABSTAINED CCUNCTI MANIlMIANO COON "� �` I .A. I/ C I LLEI L L . COUNC ILEA TAYLOR / _LOUNC I I MAN _SHANKS J _[ICF MAYOR EIDSON 4 -COUNCILMAN- STEELSMITII 7 - MAYOR CLARKE IUNAN 'IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED A ABSTAINED TOTAL • ITEM NO . 10 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 269 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 269 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 269 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , REVISING SECTION 304 . ( a ) PERMIT FEES , SECTION 305 . ( GENERAL AND TABLE 3-A OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE , 1982 EDITION ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL • • rbs, ITEM NO . 10 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 269 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 269 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 269 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , REVISING SECTION 304 . ( a) PERMIT FEES , SECTION 305 . ( a) GENERAL AND TABLE 3-A OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE , 1982 EDITION ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL S CHF ✓o t PrP U ,,., a {i,IASka Y h Z i.• T 1 qR�zo �NP i12 o L % uc`ie � unction .r► March 28, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYO ,AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER 1 -J FROM: CITY CLERK // SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF BOND ADVISOR As authorized by the City Council at the March 21st special meeting, bond advisors will be invited to attend the April 2nd work session in order to make presentations to the Council regarding their services. The selection of a bond advisor will appear as an item on the April 3rd agenda. A suggested motion is attached for your consideration. The details for the motion will not be available until after the work session presentations. AM\ kmc Approver for Agenda atp Item # First Reading y 3// > // r Second Reading - Public Hearing Gld Business New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Q °; .-. '', 1 n 7 y ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: ))011-)1 SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTT)SON COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH ' COUNCILMAN TAYLOR . COUNCILMAN mil_ COUNCILMAN SHANKS I/ COUNCILMAN .DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE , UNAN F1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Amok !Ink • • ,a.1>... <r: n.,x...F-..,,r ,s .. '--- .3x'T'r----- -ti'i" _m1,'"-- da-' .^Pr[ • ks ;,s r '-i}fr l sh;'4 Aw yw-xr..c ..*:i• SEA L . . '^`"':.` 't,,. .w, .,t. , ,.' n 'a. .' �.,^.n.a:.r- `ram -,,, -'. -k,,, � -. y, .-,---et ,*.. .:. ..',• .. ,� �{� � .. 4 .�:M Ss2,�.5t� � �^afi�" _ ITEM NO . 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT °1`_ ';�, �:'9 ' :� BE DESIGNATED AS THE BOND ADVISOR FOR i STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS Tr,F--_ ER..S AT THE MAY 15TH SPECIAL ELECTION . .r .m b. I i 4,0 , i ,, '6 ti¢� �. , z t ,� k 'tiRizoNP Vitt' o, c. .iliache &unction March 19, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYi! AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER i'•it ( FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: CITY BOARD OF HEALTH APPOINTMENTS -- AGENDA ITEM FOR APRIL 3, 1984 In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 36-165, "The mayor of each incorporated city shall , at the first meeting of the governing body in April of each year, appoint two members of the governing body who, with the city engineer and the city health officer shall constitute the city board of health." Councilman Shanks and Councilman Hill were appointed to serve as the Council representatives on the city board of health in April , 1983. City Engineer Jim Bakkedahl and Dr. Dean Seeman are the remaining members of the board. A motion is attached for your consideration. kmc Approver for Agenda b----- y�te Item # 3/x First Reading 7 AO Second Reading - Public Hearing - Old Business +7New Business __ Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES .4.-\.) '' '11 vbfl'i )/ ' ITEM # W MEETING F ,4./ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS ,.. , COUNC I Lf"AP! DAM IANO Ni 1 COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH • VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR 4 _COUNCILMAN HIL L ,MAYOR CLARKE UNANIM US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED j ABSTAINED TOTAL ON\ Om\ . • .• . . • ,- . • . - • • •.,. •, . •. •_ _ . . • . -• • . - " , . - • .• • •• , • - • _ . . . _ . ••.• - • - . • . • _ _ , • • . . .. , ..„•-• • _ • - • . • • • - _ .. „ . . -.. • . • , • ., . - . • - - - • . . . . • , - . - . . _ •.... - • • • • • . • . • . •- • • • . .•. . , . - • - . • _ . ITEM NO . 12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT '\ AND BE 4\ ' \ ,-- APPOINTED TO SERVE AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES ON THE CITY BOARD OF HEALTH , SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE AT THE FIRST COUNCIL MEETING IN APRIL , 1985 . I 7 i:,,..41/4, (:) 0 ',i Z ,.., . „, , ok.,...!,,.. ..t,,_,r , ,!0,.;. ,........ q,ii,Zowx cpity o . pache cunction March 27, 1984 Approver for Agenda Aga. a @e-r Item If MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY ' UNCIL First t==-riling / `�`/ I. S er,] 41eadinr,. THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ;a �.. Pu c hearing Old Business FROM: /5OMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT J New Business Consent Agenda SUBJECT: SWIMMING POOL FEES The Parks & Recreation Commission at their regular meeting on March 26, 1984 recommended the following fee schedule be established for use of the new community swimming facility. Daily Fees 18 & over 13 thru 17 12 & under .75 .50 ,25 Individual Season Pass 18 & over 13 thru 17 12 & under $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 k aa Family Season Pass � �" j,1I peo Pool Rental (Private Party's) $25.00 per hour The Commission feels these fees are comparable to what other communities charge (see attached) , but feel they should be evaluated on an annual basis. Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. pw 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Swimming Pool Fees City/Town Daily Fees Season Passes 18 & over 13 thru 17 12 & under Individual Family Casa Grande $1.00 .75 .50 0 $65,00 ^ Chandler .75 .50 .25 15.00 40.00 Mesa .75 .50 .35 0 40.00 Tempe .50 .25 .25 0 (*35.00-50.00) Kearny .60 .50 .50 $20,00 45.00 *depends on family size p r ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEf1 # \il) f MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : Li/ Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILM AN DAPS I ANO If COUNCILMAN STE.ELS1 7 j , . _MAYOR_CLARKF , UNAN "^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Amok. Ask • • • ITEM NO . 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE SWIMMING POOL FEES BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED � ,/ ,� `��` c)" ,.:?ACHE- t-- ,4,14 fl ''', *'' ° dqR/ZONP COity o Lipache C unction March 27, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR & COUNCIL,. 9 THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: `COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS As of April 1, 1984 the terms of Lois Broman, Ted Millspaugh, and Irene Wernett have expired from the Parks & Recreation Commission. At their regular meeting on March 26, 1984 it was decided only Irene Wernett 'would not continue to serve. A recommendation to the City Council was made to reappoint both Lois Broman and Ted Millspaugh to three year terms expiring on April 1, 1987. At this time there are no Talent Bank Applications on file to fill the vacant spot. Advertisements have gone out recently in the local papers soliciting interested individuals to serve on this commission. Hopefully you will be able to appoint this position in the near future. Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. pw Approver for Agenda ige/ triel Itefm//�i r-„,-* „-,�7 3! —c ht armg :d 3usiness r w Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 � PeACN��G'✓ ._: . ur: "l-41zo ' (c it y on 04 7ac/22 v u n,;(;(ion TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR i G7rkr 4- ec rea /i b BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 3/ VS 7 NAIE: J 0 WI toy 4PiPle 1-- TELEPHONE: ! <2 - 7'7 Y (home) Same (offic: [� ADDRESS: l.3f /9("ocia ,/4-2J ,/Q ZIP CODE: 525p,�0 OCCUPATION: hho.t .re h tirhand (if/J retired, please indicate former occupation /oor professionn) EDUCATION: Co/`Pee - ,6J A //l - 6vAAe/ ;e_,-/d l%7!✓ - la rl.7oh-ca%hi t.C. J PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO:.MUNITY ACTIVITIESCPIJI%rked t_r-S arf With (o,774' rr,• ythd/oil) i `l\rcl'n1M1nq) ma;Jena hcef-1- laht,iro �[ CZ Vl/f1Y keel C{ 5- 1T eC�j�A► L'� �t ley- 1 D III 7Ps7rnq 4yq �J •f^, ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. • 6- -77zej (7, 11, Revised 6/19/S1 Siam re of Applic '1, "r"•''R:) COPY /© 9,o/ 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETik OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES, NO ABSTAINED cnHNcl1 MAN I MIANO CfUNC I L .AN HILL . COHNC'LEAN_ TAYLOR ,/ \_\/1 ._.COUNC II MAN .SHANKS :__1IC.F MAYOR EIDSON .COUNCILMAN.. STFFI SMITH MAYOR CLARKE UNANI'IOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • �.sr.s., -av_-E*' "k.' ?,. o `e he�'tit-..5j?;o.x..t.: .,�sa.�r c�s•�A' s"a-}-it�'� a r0.-1 ?+aTv'�.w'T _.-u. r • ITEM NO . 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT LOIS BROMAN AND TED MILLSPAUGH BE REAPPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION , SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE APRIL 1 , 1987 . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT APPOINTMENTS TO THE REMAINING TERMS BE CONTINUED TO THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 17 , 1984 . ROLL CAL�LVOTE SHEET NOTES U" ' ),01) • ITEP1 # JOIri\I\ 1 MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : V .-/ XEt NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH b' ... , COUNCILMAN M.AN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON ij MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL `�'+ ,+� '�•F?.=�'v�.'cn�yi..,eTis ,�.�rr,+ca,1' :kF':��--:v .ac.�' ` � :.; 1 5.sw-. '4 ��.- _ • • ITEM NO . 15 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 16 , 1984 , AT 7 : 00 P . M . , IN THE--e$h11FN-4-W SE l,(5'1),/iN.(j11 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 17 , 1984 , AT 6 : 00 P . M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . 4.... .... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES z Pr , , .... ,_, 1-1‘ t 1 ,. /1 , oi:, ,. ,,,, ,t , ITEM #/ MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y S NO t ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH \v/// COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL )i( COUMCIL,^AN V TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO , /ICE MAYOR EIDSON4 MAYOR CLARKE UNA. PIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL PQACHF O .,N? 11. 2O ' . ,'14 „A ~ram r '9R/ZOO' c=0 ity o & pezcke unction February 21 , 1984 0.. TO: City Manager THRU: Director of Public Work ',RvAc FROM: Building Official/Zoning Administrato (1 RE: Building Permit Activity (January, 1984) Attached please find a copy of the Building Permit Activity Report for the month of January, 1984. LF:sr 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 4111.1, BUILDING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY JANUARY, 1984 1 T NUMBER OF t VALUE OF LIVING COI-DiERCIAL NUMBER 0 'TYPE PERMITS ONSTRUCTION UNITS UNITS INSPECTIO , - ,_ J SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ne f he@ ppermits is for 5 (12) 967,302 28 (12) irse 2 waits In Indian 196 86) unner on0ominiums DUPLEX - (--) - - (--) _ (---) TRIPLEX (--) - - (--) 1 (---) FOURPLEX 3 (10) 275,184 12 (40) 93 (117) APARTMENTS - (--) - - (--) - (---) MOBILE HOMES 39 (24) 377,152 39 (24) 265 (156) ADDN. (R) 2 ( 5) 10,444 - (--) 18 ( 22) ADDS. (C) 1 ( 1) 7,298 - (--) 16 ( 15) RES.C/P & GARAGES 1 ( 2) 4,612 - (--) 11 ( 2) OFFICES 1 (--) 10,000 LaMesa RV at Greyhound Track - (---) '' RETAIL STORE 1 (--) 43,224 Upholstery Shop - (---) OTHER COMMERCIAL 4 ( 3) 166,008 1-23 New t7i ilOoRacoo kan P•,i 72 (43) iCCgfpueIGGVR 16;iii .. • fnt = Cd��5,408 , .. AWNINGS 51 (50) 61,666 31 ( 30) POOLS - (--) - 3 ( 4) SIGNS 1 (--) 3,200 2 (---) SHEDS 1 ( 2) 2,400 3 �..�( 2) OTHERS 43 ( 8) 30,600 54 19) OTHER SHELTER - (--) - 30 (---) TOTAL 153 (117) 1,959,090 79 (76) 795 (696) (2,349,687) Renewals 1 ( 2) Withdrawn - (--) Void - (--) GRAND ' TOTAL 154 (119) f *KEY: ( ) = This month Last year y� PQACHF✓G O 4' ..., U -s. O _r Z • -,..} "IP/zoNP `Dity on Cache sounction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 14, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGE ACTING PLANNING DRIECTOR PREPARED BY: IM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Sri SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find a copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of February 28, 1984. Please have the original Minutes filed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk' s Office. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FEBRUARY 28, 1984 700PM MINUTES Present Absent Guests Mr. Polomskey None See attached list. h Mr Rogers Mr. Sansoni Mr. Taylor Mrs Conway Mr Vehon Mr. Sanchez, Chairman Mr McNulty, Acting Planning Director Mr Nakagawa, Acting Executive Secretary Mrs. Samuelson, Recording Secretary Synopsis Approval of the Agenda as amended Approval of Minutes dated February 14, 1984 as presented GP-2-83 (Proposed Resolution No. 83-63) - recommended for approval. PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219) - recommended for approval. PZ-46-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 239) - recommended for approval PZ-49-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 242) - recommended for approval -: � PZ-54-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 248) - recommended for approval PZ-55-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 249) - recommended for approval SUP-1-84 (Fowler) - Special Use Permit application denied SUP-2-84 (Lynn) - Special Use Permit application approved. [ PC-PZ-5-84 (Pinal County/Harambasic) - recommended for denial PZ-1-84 (Bakke/Purcell - Request for Commission Initiative) - authorized PZ-53-83 (Stachar - Request for Commission Initiative) - authorized. PZ-56-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 251) authorized for public hearing 1. Chairman after the Pledge of Allegiance was recited, asked the recording secretary to call the roll 2 Mrs. Samuelson called the roll and determined that all members were present 3. Chairman asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the Agenda dated February 28, 1984. 4 Mr. Polomskey asked that item #12 and 13 be reversed 5. Taylor/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated February 28, 1984, be approved as amended by Mr Polomskey." The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0). ( 6. Chairman there being no discussion on the Minutes dated February 14, 1984, called for a motion 7 Vehon/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated February 14, 1984, be approved as presented " The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0) oft. Amok Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 8 Chairman attempted to correct an error made at the meeting of February 14, 1984 on a motion to reconsider the vote on PZ-1-84 The motion to reconsider passed and the motion to not authorize the Commission Initiative failed, but the motion to authorize the Commission Initiative was withdrawn when the Acting Planning Director pointed out /ma that this case was on the Agenda again tonight and noted that there might be a problem with the Open Meeting Law by considering this item at this time since a motion to reconsider can only be brought up during the same meeting in which it occurred A motion was then made to reconsider the motion made on the Agenda dated February 28, 1984 which passed unanimously A motion to accept the Agenda as amended originally made in Item #5 failed 4-3 A new motion was called for to approve the Agenda dated February 28, 1984 9 Mr Polomskey requested that Item #14 become Item #12, and Item #12 become Item #14 10 Polomskey/Rogers M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated February 28, 1984, be approved as amended in Item #9 " The motion passed 4-3-0 with Mr Taylor, Mrs Conway, and Mr Sansoni dissenting. 11 Chairman opened the public hearing on GP-2-83, Proposed Resolution No 83-83, a General Plan amendment request by George Baljo to designate "Conventional Housing Only" an area in the Palm Springs Subdivision bounded approximately by Winchester Rd , Southern Ave , Mariposa Rd , Navajo Ave , and Hondo Ave He stated this item had been continued from January 10, 1984. He asked for staff briefing. 12 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission stating that this item had been continued to allow time to develop a definition for "Conventional Housing Only " He said the definition the subcommittee was suggesting was, "Homes constructed on a permanent site using individual structural components and requiring normal phase inspection by the City Building Official." 13 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor of the case, nor was there anyone to speak in opposition, he closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 14. Sansoni/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and 1 Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, 11 Arizona, that Resolution No. 83-63, 'A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA GENERAL PLAN, ENTITLED, 'APACHE JUNCTION 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN,' ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO 82-01 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 82-48 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED, 'APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP,' SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED 'REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1983,' Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 be recommended to the Apache Junction City Council for approval " The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0). 15. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-32-83, Proposed Ordinance No 219, rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development by Randall ,oak, Industries on the northwest corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in Section 28 He added that this item was continued from the meeting of February 14, 1984 He asked for staff briefing 16 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case including the administrative data 17 Chairman asked if the applicant would like to speak on the case 18 Marty Jones stated he was representing the applicant. He commented on the case and said that this project was not included in the General Plan amendment. He made a slide presentation on the case and showed renderings 19 Mr. Vehon asked if this would be for individual families or for retirees. 20 Mr Jones replied there would be no restrictions 21. Mrs. Conway asked if a sewage system had been considered, and if the landscaping would be grass or desert. 22. Mr Jones replied that this was only an 81 unit project, and there would be a combination of landscaping. 23. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor of the case, he asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. 24. Earl Laabs stated he was speaking for the people and presented another petition to the Commission in opposition to the project which he read into the record He said they object to the noise, and traffic that would be created by this project 25 John Dassinger, Sr. said he moved in under CR-1 and had put in a paved cul-de-sac and underground utilities He added that his property would be devalued 26 Aaron Prout commented that this area was low density and that the landscaping would cause pollen. 27. Virginia Dunnagan stated she would like to keep the area low density. 28. Chairman asked for staff recommendation 29 Mr Nakagawa stated that staff shared the views of Mr Jones on housing needs He commented that the drawings shown tonight were substantially better than the originals He said that if the project is approved all six criteria of Section 33 09 of the Zoning Ordinance must be met, along with complying with the requirements of the Fire Department and City ._.. Engineer Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 30 Chairman asked if there was any rebuttal by the applicant 31. Mr. Janes stated that this was not high density and the traffic will not cause any hardship. He added that there is no showing that there will be added noise. 32 Chairman asked if there was any rebuttal by the opposition 33. Mr Prout asked if there was so much property available in Apache Junction, why did they want to come into a CR-1 area. 34 Mr Laabs was concerned about becoming an island of single family homes surrounded by various developments. 35. Mr. Dassinger commented that there are areas zoned for duplexes He asked where the line would be drawn. 36. Chairman closed the public hearing There being no Commission deliberation, he called for a motion. 37. Polomskey/Vehon M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zonina Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-32-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 219, application of Randall Industries for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and Fire Department. 2. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide 3. The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits. "The reasons for the recommendation are 1 The request conforms to the General Plan. 2. The request complies with Ordinance 33 09 3 It is the highest and best use of the land " The motion passed 4-3-0 with Mr Sansoni, Mr Taylor and Mr Sanchez dissentina 38 Chairman after a ten minute recess, the meeting resumed at 8 45 p m He opened the public hearing on PZ-46-83, Proposed Ordinance No 239, rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone by Arthur W. Mohr on the north side of Broadway Ave , 165 feet east of Delaware Dr in Section 19 He asked for staff briefing. Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 39. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case including the administrative data. 1 40 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case. 41. Arthur Mohr stated he was the former owner of the Triple J Market and that he would like to put in gallon water for sale. „00.\ j 42. Mrs Conway asked if that would take up all of the area 44 43 Mr Mohr replied it would take up part of the area, due east of the store 44. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for staff recommendation 45. Mr. Nakagawa stated the DCC had no objections to the reasoning and recommended a stipulation of road dedication. 46. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 47. Sansoni/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-46-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 239, application of Arthur W Mohr for his property described -- as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Commercial Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations or recommendations are. The applicant dedicate the south fifty (50' ) feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes "The reasons for the recommendation are. 1. The request is consistent with the Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan 2. Based on the applicant's previous buildings that have been seen, he builds good looking structures " The motion passed 6-1-0 with Mrs Conway dissenting, as she felt if the parcel was - zoned CB-1 anything could be put on the property. 48. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-49-83, Proposed Ordinance No 242, rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) by John and Alice Kile on the north side of Greasewood Street, 100 feet east of Grand Drive in Section 18 He asked for staff briefing 49 Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case including the administrative data. 50 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 51 Alice Kile stated that they purchased the lot and would like to put a home on the front 100' and sell the rest or put mobiles on it. 52 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, he asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. 53 Mary Heck asked how many spaces this parcel could Amok ( be divided into { 54 Mr Nakagawa replied that if the rezoning is approved, • 111 the lot can be split into 3 parcels no smaller than 8,000 square feet each He added that if the Groundwater Act passes the lot could be subdivided. 55 Ms Heck asked if there would be a septic for each lot. 56 Mr Nakagawa replied that would be up to the Health Department, but that it was noramlly one per lot. 57 Ms Heck stated she would like to keep the split down to two and retain the l; acre lots in the area 58. Chairman asked for staff recommendation. 59 Mr. Nakagawa stated that the DCC had no objection to the rezoning and recommended a stipulation of road dedication 60 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 61 Taylor/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-49-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 242, application of John and Alice Kile for their property described as, a mattter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are The applicant dedicate the south thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. ":- "The reason for the recommendation is The request substantially complies with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona." The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0). 62. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-54-83, Proposed Ordinance No 248, rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), by William J and Ena C. MacKenzie on the west side of Gold Drive, 165 feet south of Tepee St., in Section 17. He asked for staff briefing 63 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case including the administrative data Page Seven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 64 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 65. William MacKenzie stated that the lot is too large and wants to divide the property after rezoning 66. Chairman there being no one in favor and no one in opposition, asked for staff recommendation 67 Mr Nak'riwa stated that the DCC had no objection to the rezoning with a stipulation of road dedicati 68 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 69 Conway/Rogers M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-54-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 248, application of William J and Ena C MacKenzie for their property described as, a matter of public record, _ requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. "The reason for the recommendation is The request is consistent with the Medium/ High Density Opportunity General Plan [ designation for the site " The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0) 70. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-55-83, Proposed Ordinance No 249, rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence by Eldon and Carmen Unger on the northwest corner of Ohio Street and Lawther Drive in Section 19 He asked for staff briefing. 71. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case stating that the lot had been split illegally and no building permits can be issued until it is rezoned 72. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case. 73. Eldon Unger stated that he purchased the property 2 years ago and needs to rezone to get a building permit 74 Mr. Taylor asked when the lot was split. 75. Mr Unger replied prior to the City's incorporation 1l 76 Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor. 77. Peggy Moore asked if this was now grandfathered 78 Chairman replied that the rezoning was to bring the lot into conformance He then asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition, there was no one He asked for staff recommendation 79 Mr Nakagawa stated that the DCC had no objection to the rezoning r► p Page Ten - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 108. Mr. Lynn replied that approximately 171 jobs would be created including the construction. He added that there would be about 95 employed with 100% occupancy 109 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for staff recommendation 110. Mr Nakagawa stated that the DCC had no objection as long as the applicant meets the stipulations as outlined in the report 111 Chairman called for a motion. - 112. Vehon/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, • Arizona, that in case SUP-2-84, an application for a Special Use Permit for a 120 bed Nursing Home/Skilled Healthcare Center by Gene Lynn be approved. The reasons for this action are 1. That a development of this sort would help strengthen and diversify the economic base of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona 2. An operation of this type would be compatible with the basically retired-type living to the north of this property 3 Density provided here would also be in compliance with that of the City of Apache Junction General Plan. Stipulations shall be 1 That the requirements of the City Engineer be satisfied. 2 That the requirements of the Fire Department be satisfied. 3 That the requirements of the Building Official be satisfied. 4. That a majority of the proposed land- scaping consist of native, drought-resistant non-intrusive naturalizing vegetation 5. That development of the property be in substantial conformance to the approved site plan and elevations." The motion passed unanimously (7-0-0) 113. Chairman noted there were no Communications, Awards, or Presentations He stated that under Requests from Other Agencies was a Pinal County referral, PC-PZ-5-84, for rezoning from GR General Rural to RVP Recreational Vehicle Park, by John • Harambasic on the east side of Royal Palm Road, A mile south of Southern Avenue in Section 33 He asked for staff briefing 114. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 115 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 116 John Harambasic stated that this is for a 10 acre parcel with vacant land to the north and east, located south of the Superstition Freeway He said there are mobiles on the southwest corner Page Eleven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - February 28, 1984 He added that he had obtained 75% signatures in favor which by area was 92% 117. Mr. Taylor asked how many units there would be. 118 Mr Harambasic replied that he would abide by the County code • 119. Mr Nakagawa noted that 1,500 square feet is required by the County for each trailer space, but if it exceeds 100 units it will be in violation of the General Plan 120 Mr Sansoni asked the applicant if he would be agreeable to 100 units. 121 Mr Harambasic replied he would comply with whatever County regulations would apply 122. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition asked for staff recommendation 123. Mr Nakagawa stated that if the County should approve the application, the City would require the standard stipulations 124. Mr Taylor asked how much in excess this would be to the General Plan 125. Mr. Nakagawa replied that he could go in excess of 10 spaces h as per acre. 126. Chairman called for a motion. 127 Conway/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that PC-ZP-5-84, a request by John Harambasic to rezone 10 acres in Section 33 • from General Rural to Recreational Vehicle Park, be recommended to the County of Pinal for denial. The reason for the recommendation is It does not comply with our density on the General Plan " The motion passed 5-2-0, with Mr. Taylor and Mr Vehon dissenting. 128. Chairman stated that under Old Business was PZ-1-84, request for Commission Initiative by Ken Bakke and Mike Purcell to rezone from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, 15 acres on the northwest corner of San Marcos Drive and 12th Avenue in Section 29. He asked for staff briefing 129 Mr Nakagawa stated that at the February 14, 1984 meeting the Commission denied a request for a Commission initiated zoning amendment He said that the applicant had submitted a letter for a preliminary hearing to offer evidence why the Commission should initiate the proposed amendment 130. Mr Jones commented that the County records are not kept up to date and the surrrounding property owners will be notified. He said they will go out with the site plan and speak to the property owners. 131 Chairman there being no questions or discussion, he called for a motion CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 243, PZ-50-83, APPLI- CATION BY RICHARD A. AND GEORGIA ERICKSON TO RE- ZONE 1 . 5 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH SIDE OF EAST SECOND AVENUE BETWEEN HOPI AND ARIZONA ROADS IN SECTION 21 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOME- SITE ZONE (TH) , INCLUDING THE APPLICANT DEDICAT- ING THE WEST, NORTH, AND EAST THIRTY-THREE (33' ) FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED PURPOSES, B: ACCEPTANCE OF MIN- UTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1984, BE C.C. Posted 3/23/84 AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion Published 3/28 - 4/3/g4 carried. ) Planning Letter sent to applicant 3/21/84. THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, AFTER DELETING ITEM NO. 9, MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ROADHAVEN PHASE I AND II.(motion carried. ) . C.C. Scheduled for 4/3/84 agenda THAT RESOLUTION NO. 83-63, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, ENTITLED, "APACHE JUNCTION : 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, " ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 82-01 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH DOCUMENT WAS MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 82-48 ON JULY 20, 1982, AND WHICH INCLUDES THE MAP ENTITLED, "APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP," SAID AMENDMENTS AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND ON THE AMENDED "REVISED APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 2001 LAND USE MAP , C.C. Posted 3/26/84. DATED OCTOBER 31 , 1983, " BE AND HEREBY IS C.C. Land use Map revised. Letter APPROVED AND ADOPTED. (motion carried. ) send to Mr. Baljo. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 270, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 270, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 9 HEALTH AND SANITATION, ARTICLE 9-2 RE- MOVAL OF LITTER, BY ADDING SECTION 9-2-11 CONSTRUCTION SITES AND SECTION 9-2-12 INSPECTION APPROVAL ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN C.C. Posted 3/23/84 EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Published 3/28 - 4/3/84 (motion carried. ) P.W. Implemented by Building Division.THAT MRS. DOROTHY SANCHEZ BE RETAINED AS A TEMPO- RARY FULL-TIME LIBRARY CLERK FOR AN ADDITIONAL THIRTEEN WEEKS UNTIL THE END OF THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR ON JUNE 30, 1984. (motion carried. ) Personnel THAT NEILS DETROIT DIESEL BE AWARDED THE BID FOR, PD-84-1, 35 KW EMERGENCY GENERATOR SET IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,841.00. (motion carried. ) P.S. Vendor notified - contract contract signed by City Cler THAT BRUCE BAUM & ASSOCIATES BE AWARDED THE BID FOR F-84-1, COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES FOR THE IBM SYSTEM 34, IN THE AMOUNT OF $6725.00. (motion carried. ) :finance P.O. approved and mailed 3/22/84. ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATIONS OF ROSS GREVES, DAVID ALEXANDER, LARRY CLINE, ROGER SHORT, BOB BEESON, JAMES TUVELL, AND ANN LORENZO, FROM THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM, BE ACCEPTED WITH SPECIAL COMMENDATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION IN ITS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS.BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ARE HEREBY APPOINTED TO THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNI- TIES ACTION TEAM: LOCAL OFFICIAL CATEGORY APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT OR DESIGNEE, SANDY SMITH. FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CATEGORY SAVINGS AND LOAN, DAVID NICODEMUS. EDUCATORS CATEGORY CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE - APACHE JUNCTION CAMPUS, TOM HARPIN. APACHE JUNCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT, TOM JOHNSON. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CATEGORY TITLE INSURANCE, RUTH ABBOTT. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF MARCH 20, 1984 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CATEGORY CONTRACTOR, TERRY SECOR. (motion carried. ) E.D.S. THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON MARCH 21, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 268 AND OTHER COUNCIL MATTERS. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON APRIL 3, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTE ON ONE TIME BUDGET OVERRIDE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 3/28/84. THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 2, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 3 , 1984, AT 6:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 3/28/84. THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 9:25 P.M. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. • ITEM NO . 17 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P .M . ° ROLL CALL kfIcV ROLL CALL R4.SENT ABSENT J. / , W.S. -. MAYOR cLARKE VICE—f1AYOR, EIDSON i COUNCILMAN HILL V b COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V J J _ � COUNCILMANDAf�1IArJ0 TOTAL tall STAFF PRESENT W. CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY y/ CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly V FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis DIRECTOR OF PLANNING -riee_Ge ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel v • 0 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman ✓ v CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch ,0)"" �� ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph V ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 03 '!) ck ITEM # , \ MEETING OF POTION BY: tu&ScivNr „ SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTDSON COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH SLO !NCILmArl TAYLOR _ , COUNCILMAN Elli L COUNCILMAN SHANKS ,COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE UNAVIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL sank CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION n REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: K Nl C- re_ DATE: — 3— L/ ADDRESS: 1 i p( ) S W V\r12. D AGENDA ITEM: etc,-,- -1-4> L j }=(-