HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 05.01 City Council Regular Agenda QACH
F✓
1?: e r 6 � 64etY ,
r4 Y I O
0OA.Y
4
Z
ty i
,IR/ZoNP c0ily (15 &479ac/'Ge unction
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
MAY 1 , 1984 7:00 P.M.
6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (if required)
6 :00 P.M. WORK SESSION (if required)
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
(1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA
(2) ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA
A. Proposed Ordinance No. 247, PZ-53-83, Application by Keith
and Kathryn Stachar to rezone 0. 9 acre parcel, located at
the southwest corner of Greasewood Street and Desert View
Drive in Section 18, from GR General Rural to Trailer
.•. Homesite Zone (TH) .
B. Proposed Ordinance No. 260, PZ-7-84, Application by Agnes
Camilleri through Hubbard Construction, Inc. , to rezone
2. 86 acre parcel, located on northeast corner of
Superstition Boulevard and Delaware Drive in Section 18,
jp/f from GR General to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone.
Ofi�f� l�" C. Proposed Ordinance No. 261 , PZ-8-84, Application by Agnes
(J- Camilleri through Hubbard Construction, Inc. , to rezone
10 acre parcel, located on east side of Delaware Drive
iL between Greasewood and Roundup Streets in Section 18, from
C'L61;" GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone.
D. Proposed Ordinance No. 262, PZ-9-84, Application by
Millett Manor , Inc. , to rezone one-acre parcel, located
at 529 North Gold Drive on east side of Gold Drive, about
800 feet south of Superstition Boulevard in Section 20,
from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone.
E. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of
April 9, 1984
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
F. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of
April 17 , 1984
INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED GUESTS AND VISITORS
AWARDS , PRESENTATIONS , AND COMMUNICATIONS
Proclamation for Elks Youth Week
State Workmen' s Compensation presentation for 1983
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(3) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 252, PZ-1-84, Application by Ken Bakke
and Mike Purcell to rezone 15 acre parcel, located at northwest
corner of San Marcos Drive and 12th Avenue in Section 29, from
GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned
Development . (First Reading)
(4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 258, PZ-5-84, Application by ICAM
Properties and Clara Carney to rezone 8. 9 acre parcel, located
on west and east sides of Thunderbird Drive, 300 feet south of
Apache Trail in Section 20, from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local
Business Zone. (First Reading)
(5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 263 , PZ-10-84, Application by Donna and
Robert Loewenstein to rezone 10. 8 acre parcel, located at
northeast corner of Broadway and Ironwood in Section 20, from
GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) .
(First Reading)
(6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 264, PZ-11-84, Application by Guy and
Dorothy Ridenhour to rezone 1. 25 acre parcel , located on south
side of Shiprock Street , 165 feet east of Main Drive in
Section 18, from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite
Zone (TH) . (First Reading) .-.
(7) APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE,
WEST-WINDS RESTAURANT
OLD BUSINESS
(8) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219, PZ-32-83, Application by Randall
Industries to rezone 10 acre parcel, located at northwest
corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in Section 28, from
CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned
Development . (Second Reading) (Continued Item)
(9) APPOINTMENTS TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
(Continued Item)
(10) APPOINTMENT TO PERSONNEL BOARD
(11) AWARD OF PAYMENT TO NESBITT CONTRACTING, PROJECT NO. PW-84-3
NEW BUSINESS
(12) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-9, AB-84-6, KOVACS , RAFFERTY,
AND MATOUSEK
(13) LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND APPLICATION
(14) WORK SESSION, MAY 14, 1984
EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION MAY 15, 1984
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
(15) INFORMATION AND REPORTS
(COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS)
REQUESTS OF COUNCIL
(16) ADJOURNMENT
"THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR
COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS . "
�...
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
°ye'
ITEf 1 # I MEETING OF 2C1
jMOTION BY: {, 5011 SECONDED BY.
YES NO ABSTAINED
VICE MAYOR FTTISON COUNCILMAN; STEELSMITH ////
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR
SIMCILMAN mil_
COUNCILMAN SHANKS , i.
,COUNCILMAN DAMIANO
MAYOR CLARKE ,
UNANF.OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED
TOTAL
r.
•
•
•
•
•
.. 3e.. �.. ..�} w'4`e• � +-' T'RG .rtr^T+,.i'$ 7fCY^,"laC,-lYIL IhSi��".�i.:..
•
4� v �J c arm` c"-' �ry tti!+�""'+.xA�}? �'R r"k' •s'ti. �_ia' } -
ITEM NO . 1
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE AGENDA
BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED .
ACHE ✓G
p i ti
` I ,.1 L 5
gR/ZCNp, C ity ot Apache c&unction
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
March 28, 1984
MEMORANDU : THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: j MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: ar.L@J, JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-53-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 247)
APRIL 17, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 1 , 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case No. PZ-53-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 247, is a request
by the applicants Keith and Kathryn Stachar to rezone their property
from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a
vacant 0.9 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Greasewood
Street and Desert View Drive in Section 18. It is designated Medium/
High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land
00.
uses include vacant land, mobile homes, and a house.
Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments
The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be
consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan
designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the
dedication of the north and east thirty-three feet (33' ) of the
subject property for public roadway and associated purposes.
Approver for Agenda
•at- Item #
First f?cuding
Sccor'd Ro dirg 50.E
�Pui;;cc Hearing
Old business
New Business
Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
The Honorable Mayor . .i City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-53-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 247)
March 28, 1984
Page Two
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of
March 27, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following
motion: (M/S Polomskey/Sansoni 6-0-0)
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-53-83, also known as
Proposed Ordinance No. 247, application of Keith and Kathryn Stachar
for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting
rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the
Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval
of said application.
Any stipulations or recommendations are:
The applicant dedicate the north and east thirty-three feet (33' )
of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes.
The reasons for this recommendation are:
1 . The request is in compliance with the General Plan medium density
designation for the site.
2. The request is compatible with surrounding properties':
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO. 247
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-53-83_ , application of
Keith and Kathryn Stachar
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 247 ,
00.14,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-53-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS,
•
AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL.
The applicant dedicate the north and east thirty-three feet (33')
of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE:
OPTIONAL CHOICES
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference."
b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons.)
c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
out for the City Clerk.)
/ A0.1%. /1
' ORDINANCE NO, 247
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-53-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER
HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY.
r`' aw -° '' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. egiN
. SECTION I IN GENERAL
The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona,
Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as.
The East # of the North } of the North 1 of the Southwest A
of the Southeast A of the Southwest A of Section 18, Township 1
North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian,
located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona;
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the
stipulation that the applicant dedicate the north and east thirty-three
feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated
purposes.
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
,-- „..---J.,..., All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
are hereby repealed
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
I If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 .
a, Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
Da id Alexande
City A torney
1
z
PZ-53-83
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 247)
PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH)
f"N
.1 ► 1 ' 'EET
TH > ii1
c21 —
c
•
• O
Z i
•
WEST GREASEWOOD STREET -,
A ,A.....,
_ .=. _ . , _ . ._.
--j
I
. .., , . .., , :...._ .
I 1 II
. i
1
, .
i TH I
i I
I
1 1
_ n - in' 1' t11 vi'1
— RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINES
}
SUBJECT SITE
t . N --1
I.1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GR GENERAL RURAL)
SCALE: 1" = 200'
/'*.
PZ-53-83
4.
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 247)
PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH)
y _ 111 E.£isnN4, ROAAS'
tip..'L - .i.33,••, ., ,„ 11iiar10 _�G f .-
►.I.iGt��]a5+C.lr3.a• • '..z� � �9��y-"'r'r✓'"--,4,-'.
z
IN,--, I%
W 1 p..
I'•:1
Q &
'
IL
` - - - Y„!tl ..a•.i--.-^_7rY �1M+r• �� �� �!
•
F L+
y > _. .%Vg: .t.,dam.
At
-Ill
fx
r -- .r - iv. _ _ g .`,-,,,� t• :..�+. .�.��z" t 'ari=� 7 ,'
•
F- _
Ci
:2 J
•
• ',.;1!:-.1:2?7 -
,:' _ �- = RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINES
>24 N
- "" I + LIMITS OF ZONING (RE'•1AINDER IS GR GENERAL RURAL)
•
•
• SCALE: 1" = 200'
- -N --',.'. i
-
psACHF✓G.T r
....
U,._
� O
Z
.\\
gRIZ ,_
OO' VDity 4 cpache c2unction
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
March 28, 1984
MEMORANDUTO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
fl
THROUGH: G; MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/
/" . ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR
i
FROM: -i tJ JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-7-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 260)
APRIL 17, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 1 , 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case no. PZ-7-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 260, is a request
by the applicant Agnes Camilleri through Hubbard Construction, Inc,
to rezone her property from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence
Zone. The site is a vacant 2.86 acre parcel located on the northeast
corner of Superstition Boulevard and Delaware Drive in Section 18.
It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity - Medium/High Density
on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile
home park, and commercial business.
Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments
The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be
consistent with the Local Commercial - Medium/High Density General Plan
designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the
dedication of the west forty feet (40' ) and the south fifty feet (50' )
of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes.
Approver for Agenda
yat- Item #
First Reading n
77
Second Reading 5A (7'
j Public Hearing
Old Business
New Business
'✓Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-7-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 260)
March 28, 1984
Page Two
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of
March 27, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following .•.
motion: (M/s Conway/Sansoni 6-0-0)
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-7-84, also known
as Proposed Ordinance No. 260, application of Agnes Camilleri
through Hubbard Construction Inc. for her property described as,
a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General
Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends
to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application.
Any stipulations or recommendations are:
The applicant dedicate the west forty feet (40' ) and the south
fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for public roadway
and associated purposes.
The reasons for this recommendation are:
1 . The request complies with the General Plan.
2. It will definitely be an asset to the neighborhood."
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:ma s
( 00/44%
•
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO 260
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-7-84 , application of
nr Agnes Camilleri through Hubbard Construction. Inc.
•
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 260 ,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-7-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS,
AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL.
The applicant dedicate the west forty feet (40') and the south
fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and
associated purposes
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE
•
OPTIONAL CHOICES
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference."
b (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons.)
c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
• out for the City Clerk.)
I
PIN #04s
, ORDINANCE NO 260
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-7-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
4 tir BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT-
SECTION I IN GENERAL elS
The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona,
Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as
- The South # of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest $ of the
Southeast $ of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East,
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction,
mot. Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the east 283 feet thereof,
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, subject to the
stipulation that the applicant dedicate the west forty feet (40') and the
south fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and
associated purposes
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
_._ i All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
are hereby repealed.
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19
Wendell J Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST.
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
I APPROVED AS TO FORM:
\„ ( nnder i „„„A„,/
'av�t - -•lexa
City Attorney
1.
- PZ-7-84
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 260
PROPOSED REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO MULTIPLE
RESIDENCE (CR-5)
W. GREASEWOOD ST.
• 1
1
1
CHOLLA I,
VISTA )�
ESTATES lc
cc - 1:
_ q cc
II w q PE'
q 1tL
3 /
Q 1.2
w t;ii
W• SUPERSTITION BLVD,
PLEBLO' .
�. CB-� !q wnl— CB-2....._.........
' c
} �i= _...�_.
w
DEL SO_ 0 j Ti' t U
.,2: :z , ,i„ --- -•_:-„ ,f ; y I c
CHOLLA ST.1 - z1 f
1
RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINES
SUBJECT SITE
N r-I LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL)
J t_
SCALE• 1"=200'
01
' -
PZ-7-84
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 260
,-._. - ' — --= - - PROPOSED REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO MULTIPLE
= = RESIDENCE (CR-5)
_- ..y..w-,-;--__ _ ._ ____.:,.:sue--:+:�.
- • EK15fi/V 4 viTGADS
y s^iS "e'3•iK•R _ .0 �y�y t• F'.1Y
7.1
^.fir
�x. L Ff
r _:- - xw
r _ tit
` v - i Ai r {
__ =yam:: ; .!.
.
I• ;r CHO i
.at :,;:, ur V I
- �,," x ;;;:, �i EST
•
I.
i.
�y�- Y T� � CB 0'
...�4R�r= 1: '
:a `1- v_? - PL E:BLO ...W,I CB_ �N ' CB 2 �}_
� � � � � 3 ht. DEL SO_ z
r I
lEtti
-i�ra i - - . •
■
RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINES
xµ r - SUBJECT SITE _
-•
N r LILTS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL)
SCALl . t!' as'
( CH1>
! 4'
n..4
U I%i . I.
Z
tip..-q,pIZONp. V it y 075. Cipache @9unctian
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
March 28, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: id MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: l
JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-8-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 261 )
APRIL 17, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 1 , 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case No. PZ-8-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 261 , is a request
by the applicant Agnes Camilleri through Hubbard Construction, Inc.
to rezone her property from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence
Zone. The site is a vacant 10-acre parcel located on the east side
of Delaware Drive between Greasewood and Roundup Streets in Section 18.
It is designated Medium/High Density on the General Plan. Surrounding
.-. land uses include mobile home parks and houses.
Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments
The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be
consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan
designation for the site. The DCC does recommend stipulating the
dedication of the north, east, and south thirty-three feet (33' ) , and
the west forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway
and associated purposes.
Approver for Agenda Le---1
..3a Item #
First Reading " 1 .'" it,
Second Reading ��:
Public Hearing
Old Business
New Business
Z Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-8-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 261 )
March 28, 1984
Page Two
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of
March 27, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following
motion: (M/S Sansoni/Taylor 6-0-0)
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of
Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-8-84, also known as
Proposed Ordinance No. 261 , application of Agnes Camilleri through
Hubbard Construction, Inc. for her property described as, a matter
of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to
CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends to the
Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application.
Any stipulations or recommendations are:
The applicant dedicate the north, east, and south thirty-three
feet (33' ) and the west forty feet (40' ) of the subject property
for public roadway and associated purposes.
The reasons for this recommendation are:
1 . The request is more than compatible with the General Plan.
2. It is the best and highest use of the land."
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
i
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO. 261 '
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-8-84 , application of
Agnes Camilleri through Hubbard Construction, Inc.
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 261 ,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-8-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
t
CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;
AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL
The applicant dedicate the north, east, and south thirty-three
feet (331), and the west forty feet (40') of the subject property
for public roadway and associated purposes
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE:
OPTIONAL CHOICES
.
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference."
b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons )
c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will
j have to read them and you are requested to write them
out for the City Clerk.)
ORDINANCE NO 261
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING_
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-8-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE „oak
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT.
SECTION I IN GENERAL
The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona,
Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as
Parcel No 1
At, The North 2 of the Northwest - of the Southwest ; of the
z, . .. Southeast of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East,
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction,
Pinal County, Arizona, and
Parcel No. 2.
The South z of the Northwest ; of the Southwest ,- of the
Southeast ; of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East,
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction,
Pinal County, Arizona,
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, subject to the
stipulation that the applicant dedicate the north, east, and south
thirty-three feet (33' ), and the west forty feet (40' ) of the subject
p f pic roadway and associated purposes.
SECTION
roperty IIor REPEALINGubl ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
are hereby repealed
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ^A
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
y a_ any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19
Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST.
, x
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO 261
PAGE TWO
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ct
I D vi .4exand
City Attorney
1
_ f
{
l
•
•
}
PZ-8-84
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 261
PROPOSED REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO '^
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE (CR-5)
W. ROUNDU
j
TH
f 1 0
3 Q
Q q
J Z
w
Z
N. GREASEWOOD ST,
ow mai
I
Ty
CNOLLA N
V STA 1P
=� 1 ES Al ES {�
I -
RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINES
SUBJECT SITE
N r I LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL)
SCALE 1"=200'
elli
fr
i
I
PZ-8-84
�. . PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 261
PR PasEn REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO
I�UIILLHF RESIDENCE (CR5
4
�snw4 CDs
•
q �i
VI
x >.
it;,
Tif
4 /; / /
r: ( 1 1
i `
1
•
-ram -�-- -w a sa ._ �, .I
e - t ,•A 1 E S
r-� ; -jam • �- :a?
- -.r-; _ .,r..'..W-4+`;:
.
_...� .t .� � 4,- _ -, Rra-T aF WM-Y/ aaF r? u_Nr..s
:a
•
sualecr SrTE
N r_1 LLMI75 QF ZC7arNG (EFEMAI-NITR IS- 6.ENC AI_ RURAL)
`' SCALE: I"2OG t
_mot- - l:` j :4' •-;,-- - :'.:.:....
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
.010%, e/
,,,,,,1 4 if
,/,),
•
ITEP1 # _ , MEETING OF 6/ f W
MOTION BY : (tit ° SECONDED BY: _/
YES NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR I
COUNCILMAN HILL V/
COUNCILMAN SHANKS
VICE MAYOR
_ FIDSON
, COUNCILMAN DAMIANO j
_COUNCILMAN STEELSMITh
MAYOR_CLARKF
UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
)0()
ripp)/
Off
•
ITEM # 07/�
MEETING r OF -
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
YE NO ABSTAINED
Cnl1NCIl MANI IMIANO
CnuNC I LMAM! HILL
COUNCILrA TAYLOR
V
. COUNC I I MAN ,HANKS
.ill_CF MAYOR EIDSON
_COUNCILMAN. STEELSM I T
M ky/
MAYOR CLARKE
UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
•
•
,�c ,.� WRY"IW'6A+i+]..o.aRv
f.�' "$a'k'i_i�,� :�.,'�'�'�n 444� *
ITEM NO . 2C
Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE
NO. 261 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE
BE WAIVED .
(NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous ,
the clerk must read the entire ordinance. )
Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 261 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE SECOND READING .
Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO. 261 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ,
ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-8-84 FROM GR GENERAL
RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED
AND ADOPTED .
FOR APPROVAL
•
•
•
•
ITEM NO . 2C
Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE
NO. 261 , BE READ BY TIT.LE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE
BE WAIVED .
(NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous ,
the clerk must read the entire ordinance. )
Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 261 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE SECOND READING .
�-�n 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO . 261 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ,
ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-8-84 FROM GR GENERAL
RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED .
FOR DENIAL
4 PQACHE✓G
ii'
(.>
PcP."5
gRiZONP V it/ on (94pa,clie 2unction
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
March 28, 1984
,_ Approver for Agenda
t Item #
First Reading �
MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading =: == 7:2
Public Hearing
THROUGH: '_ .9i, f MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ ____ Old Business
( ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR _sZNew Business
FROM: q 1 JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER -Z Consent Agenda
J �V
SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-9-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 262)
APRIL 17, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 1 , 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case No. PZ-9-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 262, is a request
by the applicants Millett Manor, Inc. to rezone their property from
GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone. The site is a
developed one-acre parcel located at 529 North Gold Drive on the
east side of Gold Drive, about 800 feet south of Superstition
Boulevard in Section 20. It is designated Medium/High Density
Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include
apartments, a house, and a mobile home.
Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments
The DCC had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be
consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan
designation for the site.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of
March 27, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following
motion: (M/S Vehon/Conway 6-0-0)
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-9-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 262)
March 28, 1984
Page Two
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-9-84, also
known as Proposed Ordinance No. 262, application of Millett Manor,
Inc. for their property described as, a matter of public record,
requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence '^
Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City
Council the approval of said application.
The reasons for this recommedation are:
1 . The request would allow this lot to meet the General Plan designation
which allows medium/high density for this site.
2. It would be compatible with the other multi-family uses
surrounding the site."
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO. 262
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-9-84 application of
Millett Manor, Inc
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 262 ,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-9-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;
AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE•
OPTIONAL CHOICES
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference."
b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons )
c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
• out for the City Clerk.)
ORDINANCE NO. 262
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-9-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE �`
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT
SECTION I IN GENERAL
The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona,
Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as
Lot 8, Block 3, Apache Addition Acres, according to Book 5
� of Maps, Page 32, records of Pinal County, Arizona;
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone.
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
are hereby repealed.
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
'g"""ise 2'Y -*mac i
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
i validity of the remaining portions thereof
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19
Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST
3 _
Kathleen Connelly
- City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
av F A exa
City ttorney
PZ-9-84
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 262
PROPOSED REZONE FROM (GR) GENERAL RURAL TO
(CR-5) MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
W. SUPERSTITION BLVD,
W�J
Q � �
_ n
J Q
O ]
3 '
RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINES
SUBJECT SITE
N 1 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL)
- J
SCALE: 1"=200'
J
• _ •
1
"?-=:t3Stk =` f f.-::ti +;its It
j _ i "°-_ PZ-9-84
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 262
''.1.1--,;::---
PROPOSED REZONE FROM (GR) GENERAL RURAL TO
• y 5 =3 w�— (CR-5) MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
7 .,..4.4%.,-,i,,,,,.!-.`,....---,,,,,,,,,,,:e:----:•-:.,,,,,_,-.71.:, ,,,,,,,...1 ill E;(/s`rill/G, NG44 Ds
1:;.:
=
r
Ri^
'tee-.:11"::". -. Pg:
1:7:::::
7.
i.
=z�
_ s
AI
_., '41.4:,,i i....7&•:.• -.:Z.5",.-2_z_!....;_i ze-z-t:3 si 1:4,4-'':..--,--'.1-f.-,,..;-t• -za alIll-;
•
r.
r.
i.
'r r p
f -.< RIGHT OF WAY/PROPLKi! 1 INES
=�L" ,`` r SUBJECT SITE
=▪ 7 N !j LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL)'
SCALE: 1"=2fl0'
•: _. ; x,-mot_ — -••
t
I
Amok
_
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 9, 1984
The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona, was held on April 9', 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council
/111\ Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen Present Councilman Shanks, Councilman
Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano,
Councilman Taylor, Councilman
Hill, Mayor Clarke
Councilman Absent Vice Mayor Eidson
Staff Present: City Manager Michael J. McNulty
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
City Attorney David Alexander
APPROVAL OF BOND ATTORNEY FOR
STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS
City Manager Michael J. McNulty
` stated that Mr. Dick Mitchell will be the lead Attorney in the Bond issue.
Il Councilman Damiano asked what the
fee would be.
Mr. McNulty explained that the funds
would come out of the bond proceeds and the fee was not established as yet.
Councilman Shanks wished to know
what was the purpose of a bond attorney.
Mr. McNulty stated that the Attorney
would ensure the worthiness and legalities of the Bond, that they will be
redeemable and negotiable, and no one will be able to challenge the
election
Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT O'CONNOR, CAVANAGH, ANDERSON, WESTOVER, KILLINGSWORTH AND
BESHEARS BE DESIGNATED AS BOND ATTORNEY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS,
PROJECT OF 1984.
Councilman Hill seconded the motion.
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried
t
/
PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-16, ORDERING
AND CALLING A SPECIAL BOND ELECTION TO
BE HELD IN AND FOR THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION ON MAY 15, 1984
(With the Emergency Clause) )
Mr. McNulty stated that this
,..— . resolution orders and calls a Special Bond Election on May 15, 1984, with
the Emergency Clause, including the 12% per annum
Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-16, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ORDERING AND CALLING A
SPECIAL BOND ELECTION TO BE HELD IN AND FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, ON MAY 15, 1984, TO SUBMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF THE
QUESTION OF AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF UP TO AND INCLUDING
$1,500,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA,
STREET AND HIGHWAY USER REVENUE BONDS, PROJECT OF 1984; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
Councilman Taylor seconded the
motion
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
2a� -x PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 84-17, ADOPTING
FORM OF BALLOT FOR THE MAY 15, 1984,
SPECIAL BOND ELECTION AND ORDERING
NOTICE OF THE ELECTION TO THE
QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF APACHE JUNCTION
(With the Emergency Clause )
) Mr McNulty explained that this
[ '
resolution includes the Official Ballot for the Special Bond Election
Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING A FORM OF BALLOT
TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, AT THE SPECIAL BOND ELECTION TO BE HELD IN AND FOR THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON MAY 15, 1984, ORDERING THAT NOTICE OF THE
ELECTION BE GIVEN TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
Councilman Shanks seconded the
motion
. R '-: VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
EXECUTIVE SESSION )
Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT
I RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECESS INTO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, AT 7.12
P.M.
1 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 9, 1984
PAGE 2
Councilman Hill seconded the motion
1
VOTE: Unanimous
i The motion carried.
l
m.. There being no further business, Mayor Clarke adjourned the Special
Meeting.
ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OFE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA.
Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST•
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 9, 1984
PAGE 3
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 17, 1984
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona, was held on April 17, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council
Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7.00 p.m.
INVOCATION
Vice Mayor Eidson led the Invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilman Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen Present: Councilman Shanks, Councilman
Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano,
Councilman Taylor, Vice Mayor
Eidson, Mayor Clarke
Councilman Absent Councilman Hill (ill)
Staff Present City Manager Michael J. McNulty
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
Controller Keith Lewis
Director of Public Safety
Bill McDaniel
Director of Public Works
Rich Broman
Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa
Economic Development Specialist
John Schoeph
Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson
City Attorney Davis Alexander
Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark
Others Present: Mr. Sabino Lozano
Department of Economic Security
Mr. Keith Stachar
6301 E Roundup
Apache Junction, Arizona 85220
Mr. Doyce Hubbard
Hubbard Construction
453 N Loma Vista
Mesa, Arizona
Mr. Dan Millett
Millett Manor, Inc.
65 S. Mesa Drive
Mesa, Arizona
ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA
) Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, /'`
ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED.
Councilman Steelsmith seconded the
motion.
VOTE Unanimous
The motion carried.
ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA )
Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE
IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE
NO. 254, PZ-2-84, APPLICATION BY DONNA L. AND ROBERT L. LOEWENSTEIN TO
REZONE 17,000 AND 15,000 SQUARE FOOT PARCELS, LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF
IRONWOOD DRIVE, 200 FEET AND 600 FEET SOUTH OF APACHE TRAILER IN SECTION 20,
FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; B: PROPOSED ORDINANCE
NO. 256, PZ-3-84, APPLICATION BY DANIEL RAFFERTY THROUGH MIKE KOVACS TO
REZONE 2.9 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 88 AND ON SOUTH
SIDE OF LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD IN SECTION 15, FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO
CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, C: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 257, PZ-4-84,
APPLICATION BY KENNETH RAGAN, STEVEN STAGNARO, AND NORMAN THOMPSON TO REZONE
7.78 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON NORTH SIDE OF SOUTHERN AVENUE BETWEEN ACACIA
AND STARR ROADS IN SECTION 27, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL
BUSINESS ZONE; D• PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 259, PZ-6-84, APPLICATION BY JERRY
BURGESS TO REZONE 2.5 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF TEPEE
STREET AND DESERT VIEW DRIVE IN SECTION 18, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER
HOMESITE ZONE (TH); AND E ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR AND SPECIAL
MEETING OF APRIL 3, 1984, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED.
Councilman Damiano seconded the Adook,.
motion.
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
Introduction of Distinguished Guests and Visitors
Councilman Steelsmith introduced his mother.
AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Clarke read a Proclamation establishing April 28, 1984 as Foster
Care Parents Day, and presented it to Mr. Sabino Lozano of the Department of
Economic Security.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 2
I
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
r►-
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 247, PZ-53-83
STACHAR (First Reading) )
Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to
the public.
Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa
briefed the Council and public on the rezoning from GR General Rural to
Trailer Homesite Zone located at the southwest corner of Greasewood Street
and Desert View Drive in Section 18.
Mr. Keith Stachar, 6301 E. Roundup,
Apache Junction, stated that the purpose is to divide the parcel into three
mobile home lots and requested approval of the application
Councilman Damian() asked what was to
the east of the property.
Mr. Stachar replied that there is
vacant land zoned GR General Rural to the east and a mobile home park to the
northeast.
,,_
Mayor Clarke asked if there was
anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning.
There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon
the Associate Planner for recommendations.
Mr. Nakagawa stated that there are
no objections from the Development Coordinating Committee and the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to
the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 247, by
title only for the first reading.
A
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 247, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY,
ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE
PZ-53-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY
,-s- ,'.=,-' ,r`:- -z. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 251, PZ-56-83
COMMISSION INITIATIVE (First Reading))
Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to
the public.
Mr. Nakagawa stated that this is a
Planning and Zoning Commission initiated amendment to Article 28 of the
Zoning Ordinance which deals with the procedures and requirements of zoning
ordinance amendments and zone changes.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 3
Mayor Clarke asked if there was
anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition.
There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon
the Associate Planner for recommendations.
Mr. Nakagawa stated that the City
Attorney has advised these amendments, which are commonly found in zoning
ordinances of other cities. -However, one addition that may be difficult to
administer in Section 2805, which the City Clerk has identified, requires
that rezonings be published in two local newspapers and posted in 10 lo-
cations which is not required by State law Mr Nakagawa stated that the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the amendments. Ala
Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to
the public
Councilman Taylor asked if the new
fee schedule includes the additional posting and publishing of notices.
Mr. Nakagawa explained that it
covers merely a fraction of the actual additional cost.
Mayor Clarke stated that the amend-
ments could be approved without Section 2805.
Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE
IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 251, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY
CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED.
Councilman Damiano seconded the
motion.
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
Mayor Clarke called upon the City
Clerk to read Ordinance No. 251, by title only with the emergency clause.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as
follows
ORDINANCE NO. 251, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY,
ARIZONA, AMENDING "THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME
II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE," BY AMENDING
"ARTICLE 28, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AND ZONE CHANGES"; REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE
IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 251, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING "THE CODE OF
THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE," BY AMENDING "ARTICLE 28, ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENTS AND ZONE CHANGES", REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT: DELETE, PARAGRAH TWO,
SECTION 2805: LINE THREE AND PORTIONS OF LINE FOUR THAT READ" AND AT LEAST
ONE (1) TIME IN TWO LOCAL PUBLICATIONS IF PUBLISHED OR CIRCULATED IN THE
MUNICIPALITY."
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 4
oak As.
i
City Attorney David Alexander read
from the Statutes the legal requirements for rezoning notices
Councilman Damiano seconded the
motion.
k VOTE Unanimous
Aar,
The motion carried.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 260, PZ-7-84,
CAMILLERI (First Reading) )
Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to
the public.
Mr. Nakagawa stated that this is a
request for rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone,
located on the northeast corner of Superstition Boulevard and Delaware Drive
in Section 18, by Agnes Camilleri through Hubbard Construction, Inc.
Mr Doyce Hubbard, 453 N. LomaVista,
Mesa, stated that the proposal is to build four plex units on the property,
and requested approval
Mayor Clarke asked if there was
anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application.
There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon
- the Associate Planner for recommendations.
Mr. Nakagawa stated that the
Development Coordinating Committee recommends approval and the Planning and
Zoning Commission has no objections to the rezoning, as the request complies
with the General Plan.
Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to
the public
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read
as follows:
ORDINANCE NO 260, AN ORDINANCE OF
Amok
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY,
ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE
PZ-7-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 261, PZ-8-84
1_43 ° .A.= -; CAMILLERI (First Reading) )
Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to
the public.
Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on
the request for rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence
Zone, located on the east side of Delaware Drive between Greasewood and
Roundup Streets in Section 18
Mr. Hubbard stated that this is
Phase II of the previous project.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 5
I
Councilman Taylor asked if
Mr. Hubbard has done similar construction prior to this.
Mr. Hubbard stated that he had
developed for Riviera Capital in Tempe, Mesa, and Chandler.
Y' ,,' t-0" Mayor Clarke asked if there was
anyone wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application ..n..
There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon
the Associate Planner for recommendations.
Mr. Nakagawa stated that the
Development Coordinating Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission
have no objections with stipulations of dedication of rights-of-way
Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to
the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 261, by
title only for the first reading.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 261, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY,
ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE
PZ-8-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 262, PZ-9-84
MILLETT MANOR, INC. (First Reading) )
the public. Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to
Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on
the request for rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 Multiple Residence
Zone, located at 529 North Gold Drive on the east side of Gold Drive, about
800 feet south of Superstition Boulevard in Section 20
Mr. Dan Millett, 65 South Mesa
Drive, Mesa, representing Millett Manor, Inc., requested approval of the o..,
rezoning
Councilman Damiano asked if these
improvements would be single story.
Mr. Millett stated that they would
be single story
- - . n ` Councilman
- c lman Shanks commented that the
improvements were already apparent.
Mayor Clarke asked if there was
anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning.
There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon
the Associate Planner for recommendations
Mr. Nakagawa stated that the
Development Coordinating Committee has no objections and the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval of the request.
1
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 6
-
Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to
the public, and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 262, by
title only for the first reading.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read
as follows
ORDINANCE NO 262, AN ORDINANCE OF
i•►. THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY,
ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE
PZ-9-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting.
Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting
OLD BUSINESS
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219, PZ-32-83
RANDALL INDUSTRIES (Second Reading)
(Continued Item)
City Manager McNulty explained that
the representing Attorney Martin T Jones has sent a letter requesting a
further continuance of this rezoning application.
Councilman Shanks stated that the
emotionalism has depleted and the facts of this rezoning case are becoming
more apparent, so one more continuation would be beneficial.
Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219, PZ-32-83, BE GRANTED A LAST
CONTINUANCE UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1, 1984.
Councilman Steelsmith seconded the
motion.
ANN. VOTE Unanimous
The motion carried.
FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,
SUPERSTITION MOUNTAIN RESORT,
W & S PROPERTIES
) Mr Nakagawa briefed the Council on
x the final plat approval request by W and S Properties for Superstition
Mountain Resort, formerly named Superstition Shadows Travel Trailer Resort,
which submitted the related preliminary Planned Development and was approved
by the Council on November 1, 1983.
Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT THE FINAL PLAT FOR SUPERSTITION MOUNTAIN RESORT, SD-3-83, BY W
AND S PROPERTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED, WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS
OR CONDITIONS AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO APPROVAL:
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 7
_
1. THAT THE APPLICANT PAY ALL RECORDING FEES
2. THAT THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVE THE PROPOSED METHOD OF
SEWAGE DISPOSAL PRIOR TO THE STATE'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBDIVISION.
Councilman Taylor seconded the
motion.
VOTE Unanimous
The motion carried.
CONTINUATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION )
Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, BE
CONTINUED UNTIL THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 1, 1984
Councilman Taylor seconded the
motion.
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
{ NEW BUSINESS
PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 84-12,
ESTABLISHING POLLING PLACES, DATE
OF ELECTION, VOTING DISTRICTS,
( ELECTION OFFICIALS, AND METHOD OF
Il VOTE (With Emergency Clause)
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
informed the Council that in accordance with State law, the City Council
must adopt certain rules and regulations pertaining to an election prior to
the actual date of the election.
Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT
• RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES,
ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 1984,
ESTABLISHING POLLING PLACES AND VOTING DISTRICTS, PROVIDING FOR THE
RECORDATION OF THE ELECTORS' CHOICE; PROVIDING FOR ELECTION OFFICIALS, AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
Councilman Damiano seconded the
... ., motion
VOTE. Unanimous
The motion carried
APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION OFFICIALS )
Ms Connelly stated that members must
be appointed to the election board not less than 20 days prior to the
election, and that if there is sufficient applicants representing a pre-
cinct, those individuals be appointed to serve in their respective precinct.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 8
Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BE APPOINTED AS ELECTION OFFICIALS.
PINAL COUNTY PRECINCTS 22A AND 22B AND MARICOPA PRECINCT APACHE:
INSPECTOR Patricia Oltman (22A)
"wok CLERKS (2) Flora Dow Whisler (22B) and Clara Lockwood (22B)
JUDGES (2) Betty Kitzman (22B) and Geraldine Gibbons (22A)
MARSHAL Curtis Toay (Maricopa Precinct Apache)
ALTERNATE Betty Thompson (22A)
PINAL COUNTY PRECINCTS 22C AND 22A.
INSPECTOR Maribelle Gardner (22C)
CLERKS FOR 22C Carole Ann Peterson (22C) and Shirley Erickson (22C)
CLERKS FOR 22F Susan Bosell (22F) and Cora Blatterspiel (22F)
JUDGES FOR 22C Jennie Bennett (22C) and Glenda Miller (22C)
JUDGES FOR 22F Peggy Baljo (22F) and Helen Kell (22F)
MARSHAL Frank Jiminez (22C)
ALTERNATE Marsha Weichers (22C)
PINAL COUNTY PRECINCTS 22D AND 22E.
INSPECTOR Jan Hiller (22D)
CLERKS Margery Wilson (22D) and Elva Davies (22E)
JUDGES Rosaline Debnam (22E) and Lois Downey (22D)
MARSHAL James Appler (22F)
:'= ALTERNATE Wendy Seeman (22D)
ABSENTEE TALLY BOARD: (for all precincts)
INSPECTOR Edith McPherson (22B)
CLERKS Irene Bloom (22A) and Margaret Carlin (22B)
It JUDGES Dorothy Seed (22E) and Jeanette Pesek (22B)
Councilman Steelsmith seconded the
motion.
VOTE. Unanimous
The motion carried.
AWARD OF BID, PROJECT NO PW-84-5,
STREET PAVING MATERIALS
Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson
stated that three bids were received and recommended the low bidder, AMCON.
Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT AMCON BE AWARDED THE BID FOR PROJECT NO. PW-84-5, STREET
PAVING MATERIALS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $20 PER TON
Councilman Damiano seconded the
motion.
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 9
r
I
i
WORK SESSION, APRIL 30, 1984
EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION
MAY 1, 1984 )
Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 30, 1984, AT 7 00 P.M., IN THE
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT'AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD
ON MAY 1, 1984, AT 6:00 P M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Councilman Damiano seconded the
motion.
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
None
INFORMATION AND REPORTS
(COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS)
Councilman Shanks reported on the Family Violence work shop
.n x -,1....
REQUESTS OF COUNCIL
None.
ADJOURNMENT )
Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT
-
RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 7:53 P.M.
Councilman Damiano seconded the
motion
VOTE: Unanimous
The motion carried.
ACITY COUNCILEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIE F THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA.
Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 10
Asir
ATTEST:
- Kathleen Connelly
• City Clerk
•
. _ [
.0064,
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 17, 1984
PAGE 11
�..
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
•
ITEM # 7/ MEETING OF c
PLOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY
Y S NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN SHANKS /
COUNCILMAJ! DAM IANO
COUNC I LMAN STEELSMITH ii
VICE MAYOR EIDSON v
I V
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR /
COUNCILMAN, InL J
_ .MAYO.R CLARKE
V
UNANII US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED
TOTAL
Aft, .+...
-
•
•
ITEM NO . 2
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CONSENT
AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , AFTER DELETING ITEM " C" AND PLACING IT
UNDER " OLD BUSINES" .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED
ORDINANCE NO. 247 , PZ-53-83 , APPLICATION BY KEITH AND KATHRYN STACHAR
TO REZONE 0. 9 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
GREASEWOOD STREET AND DESERT VIEW DRIVE IN SECTION 18 , FROM GR GENERAL
RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH ) ; B : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 260 ,
PZ-7-84 , APPLICATION BY AGNES CAMILLERI THROUGH HUBBARD CONSTRUCTION ,
INC . , TO REZONE 2 . 86 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED ON NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND DELAWARE DRIVE IN SECTION 18 , FROM GR
GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE ; D : PROPOSED ORDINANCE
NO . 262 , PZ-9-84 , APPLICATION BY MILLETT MANOR , INC . , TO REZONE
ONE-ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED AT 529 NORTH GOLD DRIVE ON EAST SIDE OF GOLD
DRIVE , ABOUT 800 FEET SOUTH OF SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD IN SECTION 20 ,
FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE ;
E : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 9 , 1984 ;
F : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17 , 1984 , BE
AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED .
PUBLIC HEARING
1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 252,
PZ-1-84 THE APPLICANT IS BAKKE/PURCELL
2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION,
3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT,
WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING
THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME ,
4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS ,
7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S
JUDGEMENT)
A. APPLICANT
B. IN FAVOR
C . OPPOSED
. k PQACH �6'
O % ti
z
\\........... ...
-c1,p,zONP Jitzy a f C pache &unction
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
April 11 , 1984 '
Approver for Agenda
Date Item 0
� ;,�
First Reading , -
Second [loading
MEMORANDUMST THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ..1„/Public Hearing
k 7,
Old Business
THROUGH• ` � MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR New Business
Consent Agenda
FROM: �' JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
INIP-
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-1-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 252)
MAY 1 , 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 15, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case number PZ-1-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 252, is a request
by the applicants Ken Bakke and Mike Purcell to rezone their property
from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development.
The applicants are proposing a 150-lot travel trailer resort, Phase II
of Sunrise. The site is a vacant 15 acre parcel located at the northwest
corner of San Marcos Drive and 12th Avenue in Section 29. It is
designated Medium Density on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses
include travel trailer parks, vacant land, and houses.
Other Information
On February 28, 1984, the Planning and Zoning Commission authorized a
Commission initiative for a public hearing on this case.
Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments
The proposed density would be 20 persons per acre which would comply with
the General Plan. If a decision is made to recommend approval of the
proposal , the Planning and Zoning Commission must find that this Planned
Development complies with all six criteria set forth in Section 33.09
of the Zoning Ordinance. Final plat approval will be required prior to
final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways.
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-1-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 252)
April 11 , 1984
Page Two
The design for Phase II of Sunrise RV Resort is an improvement over Phase I
in two respects. The proposal is a departure from the common gridiron
pattern that exists in other RV parks in that the proposed street layout
is in a more amorphous pattern. Additionally, the perimeter wall departs
somewhat from the typical linear form that exists in Phase I. However,
the Planning Department recommends that the perimeter wall be recessed
additionally at locations where existing washes enter and exit the site.
The applicant will need to take care of some drainage considerations to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Also, the applicant will need to submit
a report that the State Health Department has approved the sewage plant in
Phase I to handle the additional flow from Phase II .
There is a protest petition on file. However, none of the signers are
owners of property within 150 feet on a side, rear, or front. Therefore,
this protest petition does not require a 3/4' s vote of the City Council to
approve this rezoning.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of April 10,
1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion:
(M/S Polomskey/Taylor 6-0-0)
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-1-84, also
known as Proposed Ordinance No. 252, application of Kenneth Bakke
and Michael Purcell for their property described as, a matter of
public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH/PD
Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, that the Commission
recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of
said application.
"Any stipulations or recommendations are:
1 . That final plat approval will be required prior to final
PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated
roadways.
2. The perimeter wall be recessed additionally at locations
where existing washes enter and exit the site.
3. The applicant submit a report from the State Health Depart-
ment for approval of the sewage plant in Phase I to handle
the additional flow from Phase II.
' The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-1-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 252)
April 11 , 1984
Page Three
4. The applicant comply with all requirements of the City
Engineer and Fire Department.
5. Standards and specifications shall comply with the
City Development Guide.
6. The applicant comply with the requirements for final
Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
"The reasons for this recommendation are:
1 . The request conforms with Section 33.09 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
2. It complies with the General Plan medium density designation.
3. It is compatible with the surrounding area."
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO 252
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-1-84 , application of Kenneth
Bakke and Michael Purcell
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 252 ,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-1-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL.
1. That final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval
in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways
2. The perimeter wall be recessed additionally at locations where
existing washes enter and exit the site.
3. The applicant submit a report from the State Health Department
for approval of the sewage plant in Phase I to handle the additional
flow from Phase II
4 The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and
Fire Department
5. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development
Guide.
6 The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned
Development approval rior to the issuance of buildin ermits
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE
OPTIONAL CHOICES
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference "
b (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons )
c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
- ,. , in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
out for the City Clerk.)
Adokk Ink
ORDINANCE NO. 252
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
•
• ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-1-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD
TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR-AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT
SECTION I IN GENERAL
1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona,
Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as
ifI The Southeast a of the Northeast ; of the Northwest and the
South 2 of the Southwest } of the Northeast ; of the Northwest I
. = of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona,
•
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development
2. The approval of the zoning district classification incorporates, by
reference, the preliminary approval of the Planned Development,
including all materials and documents as submitted by the applicant,
and the development of said property shall be in accordance with
said Planned Development application conditions, provisions, and
v - .v1 stipulations, and as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The application includes the "Street Light Agreement," and, if
executed as part of this application, the "Agreement for Maintenance
of Landscaping Within City Rights-of-Way."
- E
3. Applicant shall install, at his expense, fire hydrants as per approved
plans of the Apache Junction Fire District for this Planned Development.
111 4. Applicant shall install, at his expense, off-site street improvements
as set forth on the Planned Development plans in compliance with design
details approved by the Director of Public Works
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
�` r of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
Y r �: are hereby repealed.
ry k
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
i
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
ryf;r any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof
SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE
Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance
shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000.00 or imprisonment
for a a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and
imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate
• - offense punishable as hereinabove described.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19
.
Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor
AM.
ORDINANCE NO 252
PAGE TWO
ATTEST:
•
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
• ---: • -., .,„.•
0 Si I
David . e ander
City Attorney
• . • -
• .• • -
- —• _ .
. ,• .
•
•., - L.::: ,
• •
•
. •
. .
.•
.•
I
i
PZ-1-84
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 252)
PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
I .
!i --- --- T-B VLAY 1 - - - —--I , p-- --
il
11 I 1
I ��
I
II I
I I
I II TH I ' I
1 li 1 1 TH/PD
1 11 1
1�--� 1
TH/PD �I � I
ti 1
� 1 T�
Ij
1 1 =1
...--".- WEST 12TH AVENUE
. 1- Q
1 ..,
1
1 = CR-3 ji
i.
o I
1' CR-3 1
ea
ro
I I
W.
I 1
WFST 16TH AVENUF
[ = RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINES
- , . � SUBJECT SITE
N i LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL)
SCALE. 1" = 400'
t - —
r ..a��-" �
PZ-1-84
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 252)
-.y -__ -...n' -+•- ---_= _-
k .. PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
T
-a..Rl{VRa9YFn- -,-'-:.`_ .c :41.
•. -_
r
E 4(Alweir Rootios
�: .z., - c _ ._ _ - -..
. .. ..____
_ __
_. _
...
-� 1 1 I
- _ _ •
= I 1
1 1 TEs 1
I1 THIFD
' I
l 1 GL/cit' 1 __ ..
i,
1 -r.T _ _c _ -
13/ ,
t - 6ST 1! H AVENIEF I
I
sA�I c
;,� --Y ,� 1 CR-3
R . _ • :�
l
.Cs - =..}- • .'ue 1\ CR-3 '
- = r1 I
4
_, L �_
1 I i..
=- - —
c
RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINES
• j
t = {.-f- _ r SUBJECT SITE
."7: = N r-1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL)
t_J
- SCALE: 1" = 400'
^ t .
a
We the undersigned � ,�� � `�'�`'' gn property owners protest rezoning item PZ-1-84
the rezoning from GR to TH/PD trailer homesite `hy planned development.
!),--__PI CJ is °LAI i N i l'N.i()
AND r'_'E_:..OPMEN1
Name (printed) signature
address phone
,2 (7 7 117 c 0 C R /ko�' q ,4 1 ,_ /z7 J' kez,.::3 5-1.16-2/ /17, 626-ve--.5 -1,
� 2{ (f "a
5 ,4 S'
op 1.4.., ,1 .,u''' (ate 6 S (,`�U(«=I✓, i r;;'_R`' `l " uQ ,
c-1. - et,E 2[Cf ; z,<"--14 !�-sz., -� �i...:,� t-ter-- cfS.d -.4V0 c,
6 `
r
? // ei /'/// '/r „Lf-- I3 7 S0,,tei r is-1.. qe3 J-1 7Z,
5 Lr? '/'rr)j? //ci QI! 0_5 07fK. ;1?'� , " / 7, /W-'' / 3366
,10 r. ,., w-e--4, J., .,e y1�4 I �- Pr Cam- (F�e S. Q%- 2}},.�-�-- 7 r z - s
11 7/
rA C-h C 1 7� 6,4, N /
/ / -
yeG S a7),v . 2SjSo
P), )--,PC40.3\r -,/)- 3; [v13 s---r )2_, a(Y7(
13 RO bev-` - Sn I -e y-- , 1A (55 t - 1 'PeiP )4 U1 YtI I U --.5'Z+- I
14 U w /li 7-Es K E
_%a /$7 o 4 �r..,,..,.e 2 9 Fa -514 7
15 L LA R 4 1-.C-S . _r'rhut. qeL /T 7e,,f, Y .94"g- 1 L 7
16 ,,_4`Lr,hn{.f�A ',a �sf a-�,01- /y rR '5, /�utrt�/tr!2'4 9 oZ-,Y57/
17 Lam, l/�S
A/ z A ,
19 c ,e ik Ai e)a..3e11
rw4.1 - • /9.60 Cc) oil€ 9g�-i77j
}(
20 Sh.lh J e E h1 c, L Smi . Aid: ,/
21 i - A. .i ,✓ /- a JAI %iAllit , c, '/ S 4' - ems.,•_, 7`' 5--6-CZ
rrEN - a ii IJ zi'A. .. 1101181151181aMall 972- - to
23 -.Al oC.� . d'e h Ace, 2 (1'--- , �
2 4/ Aim �� �.il/��j�,PC>�� • ,, %�02�n�U�
.►_ �� - ,e--r - f►1 v , �.�l'4Q� /&/.5 ._I, -i/ifr/ 774424'5'i Al r 9 2 ,2
2 6 , -ff1 rr 1 m aZ I ES of k.1 s Lv 1&n,t G 3) 9
S,
27 /:�. . c ;�o��.F?� .��r�i‘- �,cNiir l�5I 5�;6) /,),(fe[n5
29 --14 i .r ;--) , 5,/6, ‘_ e,a- 21,222,
/S/S� ,S. , yr/iZS -/7.2 y'
30 , - - - '.Uir./y� - _I, %z Z-- Cs—//2 _77 .4c: 9J..9-/7,,2 y
We the undersigned property owners protest rezoning item PZ-1-84
the rezoning from GR to TH/PD trailer homesite by planned development.
r. 4Ni
Name (printed) signature address phone
1 ,2/;,.„; r „,0 V, r J . 2.74/1/<--cp,- 5 _Ce-k-7-/ 9-7_2- 7/9 7
\
- l0
3
4
7
8
9
11
„12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
,24
25
26
.27
28
29
30
•
We the undersigned property owners protest „rezoning item PZ-1-84
the rezoning from GR to TH/PD trailer-homesiteby planned development.
Name (printed) • signature address phone
S
2 /
;3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
.12
13
14
15
16
17
-1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 _
25
26
27
28
29
30
•
-- - -- • - - -_ -- - -,c, � �,�.S�.;La'�LX +--_->>.s:3T�,,,}�j ��ax�"� ..✓ '�f ➢t5t� 'a `'<.
�.
•
ITEM NO . 3
CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 252 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE FIRST READING .
PUBLIC HEARING
1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 258,
PZ-5-84 THE APPLICANT IS ICAM PROPERTIES
AND CARNEY
2 , WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION,
3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT,
WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING
THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME .
4 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS ,
7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S
JUDGEMENT)
A. APPLICANT
B. IN FAVOR
C. OPPOSED
.404. Amor
0
�QACHF�G
r +'
i oA
. .._., O
Z
' ' `�Dit/ 4 C 4ac/ie unction
'�R/ZONP
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
April 17, 1984
(,:,MEMORANDUM 4 THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: ( ��MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR
(24 FROM: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-5-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 258)
MAY 1 , 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 15, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case number PZ-5-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 258, is a request
by the applicants ICAM Properties and Clara Carney to rezone their
propenty from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone. The site
is a vacant 8.9 acre parcel located on the west and east sides of
Thunderbird Drive, 300 feet south of Apache Trail in Section 20. It
is designated General Commercial on the General Plan. Surrounding land
uses include vacant land, a church, commercial businesses, and homes.
The original application was from GR General Rural to CB-2 General
Business, but due to the strong objections of the neighboring church
and residents, the applicant agreed to amend his application to CB-1
Local Business. This amendment was acceptable to those who objected to
the CB-2 without a Planned Development zoning.
Planning Department Comments
The staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be in
compliance with the General Plan designation for the site. Staff does
recommend stipulating the dedication of the east forty feet (40' ) of
Parcel No. 1 , and the west forty feet (40' ) of Parcel No. 2 for public
roadway and associated purposes, if not already dedicated.
Approver for Agenda
Date !Why I
First Reading 's/
Second Reading
Public Hearing
Old Business
New Business
Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
p
The Honorable Mayor City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-5-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 258)
April 17, 1984
Page Two
There is a petition on file protesting the extension of Thunderbird
Drive to Broadway. However, this project would not be responsible for
extending that Road to Broadway.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of April 10,
1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion:
(M/S Vehon/Polomskey 6-0-0)
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-5-84, also
known as Proposed Ordinance No. 258, application of ICAM Properties
and Clara Carney for their property described as, a matter of public
record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local
Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction
City Council the approval of said application.
"Any stipulations or recommendations are:
The applicant dedicate the east forty feet (40' ) of Parcel No. 1 ,
and the west forty feet (40' ) of Parcel No. 2 for public roadway
and associated purposes.
"The reasons for this recommendation are:
1 . This rezoning would be in compliance with the City' s General Plan.
2. This rezoning would serve as a good transition between existing
CB-2 zoning along the highway and residential to the south. "
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
Amok
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA
REZONING APPLICATION
1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification:
Parcel 1 From: Genera 1 Rural To CB-2
Parcel 2 General Rural CB-2
Parcel 3
2. I am requesting this rezone by [X] Petition and Consent [ ] Commission Initiative
3. What is the General Plan designation for the site? Commercial
4. Size of the subject property (1)135,000; (2) 253,000 [acres] [square feet]
5. How is the property currently developed? undeveloped
6 What are the adjacent land uses?
North Commercial
- South: Gen Rural & Residential
East: Commercial
- - West: RPnaral Rnrai & CnmmPrrial
7. What other application are you filing in conjunction with this rezone
(subdivision, road abandonment, etc )? None
8 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned:
See Attachements #1 & #2
Section , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base
and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona.
9. Why are you requesting this rezoning? For development that requires
CB-2 zoning
`
- (Please complete reverse side)
-
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Case No. r-E 6- '4 Proposed Ordinance No. .
Date Filed l-50-8¢ Application received by
- - Receipt No p 190 Zl4 Fee Amount I n 4
Page 1 of 2
11/83
10 I/We hereby certify that.
- a. O(We are) the owners of the property described in this application
for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other
documents as proof of ownership
b. I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning.
- 3 - - c I/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning
process to involve public-hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com-
mission and the City Council, and action to approve or disapprove our
request is discretionary
d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be
requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and
associated purposes.
e I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have
appointed William M. Warin named below as
our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him
- to do anything whatsoever necessary to have the rezoning considered
favorably by the City of Apache Junction
r
(1) ICAM Properties, a Gen Partnership • '4 G _
(print owner's name) -ti>•"�iliarl;frffall.*
919 N. Stapley Suite 0 bmo di
. (address)
Mesa. AZ 85203 834-5441
(phone)
(2)$' CLARA M. CARNEY (Contract Seller) �oe Ct� e` _q'
?.� z k y-< ( V(signature)
print owner's name)
22k N. MacDonald Apt. F
(address)
Mesa. AZ 85201 q'(,9 —t�- /
(phone)
(3)
(print owner's name) (signature)
(address)
(phone)
1( ,t ? ,
STATF CIF /-///Z cxi1 ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged
COUNTY OF /'f.0J C_C A ) SS' before me this aZ 4 day of "A) , 19 91-,
Dy',ii , A004{t4S {�c William M. Warin, Phillip W. Rundstrom, &
) 1 i Clara M. Carney ��G'i }
.'' ^° - + +.4 w4 - , := ,i (1� (P •�
(My commission expires�D01Am'nro^�v�reaDea2�.'^g4 Notary Public
11. I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the pr perty owners in t is
rezoning application as their representative and t a they have reques d that
all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me.
William M. Warin Lv..c-.•a i > -
(print representative's name) signatu
919 N. Stapley Suite n 83A-541i
(mailing address) (phone)
Mesa, AZ 85203
STATE OF ARIZONZ ) SS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged
. COUNTY OFMARTCnpA ) befor m this 30 day of Jan , 191 ,
by: William M. Warin
IZr
Notary Public
Cr;IpAL SEAL / �,,
h) RUTH ABBOTT 1 1-_*X
;sl' Y - '- .,..,..-,, ` NOTARY PUBLIC STATE Ci ARIZONA .'
A.Akil.Uri1 ccu,,II \\v'��././ -: Page 2 of 2
1 My Comm.E:p res Nov 29.1985 \ ✓ ,4
AM\ OM\
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO 258
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-5-84 , application of
IrAM Prnparties and Clara Carney
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NQ. 258 ,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
CB-3 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL
The applicant dedicate the east forty feet (40') of Parcel No 1 and
the west forty feet (40' ) of Parcel No 2 for public roadway and
associated purposes, if not already dedicated
• 3 r s ! BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE:
r k
OPTIONAL CHOICES
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference."
b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons.)
c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
out for the City Clerk.)
ORDINANCE NO 258
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1
LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT
SECTION I IN GENERAL
- - The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning
Map for the parcels of land described as
Parcel No 1-
.-
- _ -
_ That part of the Southwest of Section 20, Township 1 North,
Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache
Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, described as follows
From the interior quarter section of said Section 20, thence
South 89° 58' 12" West along the east-west quarter line of said
Section 20 828 66 feet to the point of beginning on the center-
line of Carney Avenue (a.k.a Thunderbird Drive), a roadway
recorded in Docket 276, Page 322, records of Pinal County; thence
South 89° 58' 12" West along the said east-west quarter line
491 69 feet to a point at the northwest corner of the Northeast ;
of the Southwest i of said Section 20, thence South 0° 07' 11"
East along the west boundary of said Northwest ; of the Southwest
of said Section 20 660.00 feet, thence South 89° 57' 56" East
348.90 feet to a point which lies North 0° 00' 00" East 12.19 feet
from the northwest corner of Apache Ho Unit One, a subdivision
recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 59, records of Pinal County,
thence South 0° 00' 00" West 12 19 feet to the northwest corner
of said Apache Ho Unit One, thence North 89° 59' 16" East along
the north boundary of said Apache Ho Unit One 141 41 feet to a
point on the prolongation southward of the centerline of said
Carney Avenue; thence North 0° 00' 00" East 672.23 feet along the
centerline of said Carney Avenue to the point of beginning, EXCEPT
the north 300 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the right-of-way of
Highway 60-70-80-89; and
• Parcel No 2
That part of the Southwest 1 of Section 20, Township 1 North,
Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction,
Pinal County, Arizona, described as follows
From the point of beginning at the interior quarter section corner
of said Section 20; thence South 89° 58' 12" West along the east-
west quarter line of Section 20 828 66 feet to a point on the
centerline of Carney Avenue (a.k.a. Thunderbird Drive), a roadway
recorded in Docket 276, Page 322, records of Pinal County, thence
South 0° 00' 00" West along the centerline of Carney Avenue and its
southward prolongation 672.23 feet to a point on the north boundary
of Apache Ho Unit One, a subdivision recorded in Book 9 of Maps,
Page 59, records of Pinal County; thence North 89° 59' 16" East
along the northern boundary of said Apache Ho Unit One 830.01 feet
to a point at the northeast corner of said Apache Ho Unit One
on the north-south quarter line of said Section 20, thence
North 0° 07' 00" West along said north-south quarter line 762 49 feet
to a point of beginning; EXCEPT the north 300 feet, and EXCEPT the
north 435.60 feet of the east 200 00 feet of the Southwest 1 of
Section 20, and EXCEPT the following parcel-
{
AM. oak
r
1
ORDINANCE NO. 258
PAGE TWO OF TWO
From the interior quarter section corner of said Section 20,
thence South 89° 58' 12" West along the east-west quarter line
of said Section 20 638.76 feet to the point of beginning; thence
z= South 0° 03' 48" East 311.33 feet; thence South 89° 56' 12"
West 190 24 feet to a -point on the centerline of Carney Avenue
(a.k.a. Thunderbird Drive), a roadway recorded in Docket 276,
Page 322, records of Pinal County, thence North 0° 00' 00" East
along the centerline of said Carney Avenue 311 44 feet to a point
on the east-west quarter line of said Section 20; thence North
89° 58' 12" East along the east-west quarter line 189 90 feet to
the point of beginning; and EXCEPT the following parcel
_ From the interior quarter section corner of said Section 20, thence
South 89° 58' 12" along the east-west quarter line of said
Section 20 508 76 feet to the point of beginning; thence
South 0° 03' 48" East 161 26 feet, thence South 89° 56' 12" West
130 00 feet; thence North 0° 03' 48" West 161 33 feet to a point
on the east-west quarter line of said Section 20, thence North
- 89° 58' 12" East along the said east-west quarter line 130.00
feet to the point of beginning, and EXCEPT the right-of-way of
Highway 60-70-80-89;
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone, subject to the
stipulation that the applicant dedicate the east forty feet (40') of
�t .- z Parcel No 1, and the west forty feet (40') of Parcel No. 2 for public
roadway and associated purposes, if not already dedicated.
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
- + All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
{` of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
are hereby repealed.
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
' validity of the remaining portions thereof
s
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 19
i
. _ Wendell J Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
\ � ( \ I
David F. Alexander
City Attorney
a
PZ-5-84
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 258
PROPOSED REZONE FROM ((fR) GENERAL RURAL TO
(CB-1) LOCAL BUSINESS
APACHE TRAIL
I
1
I
CB-2 CB-2 I
wi
I 1
A ,,,,,, ,
_.
p I CB-2 I
I o 1 - - - -_____ _1;-l
I
I � I
1 I
IL UNIT ONE I
APACHE HO I
I L___
cR-5 7 I
UNIT TWO I
1
CR-3/ I
APACHE HO PD
•
• . I SIERRA%� _` _ ENTRADA
��% —_—.-.r -—--1 GARDEN
r HOMES I
t _ RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINES
SUBJECT SITE
•
N t ' LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDEP IS GENERAL RURAL)
ii 1...1
SCALE' 1"=300'
PZ-5-84
- - PROPOSED ORDINAPNCE NO. 258
PROPOSED REZONE FROM (SR) GENERAL RURAL TO
(CB-1) LOCAL BUSINESS
•
,, ,SnN4 RoA aS
--,*v _ APACHE TRAIL
`r �
'. - - CB-2 }2 r
i J
-- . _ , Vi; gnI rI
-
7 , I.
I. `�U a
ys c u "II III
�. kr p la
r �� UNIT ONE
' • II ( l'i; APACHE HO �+
CR-5 ' CR-3 -.-.-
_ = UNIT TWO
,,.� r y I cR-3/
k:•. APACHE HO I PD
-r' -- L S• _ _ r
V. SIERRA
:: ' �• 's ��� �� ENTRADA
_ l
:>' _ Jr__= GARDEN
II
„„
.t r!
— RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINES
SUBJECT SITE
.t+:a.zr•7:ea.; -Lam-...z.ri-1.
DI t• LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL)
-,- . '_i
ALE:: I"=30G
rt
- .%L :�;-�"_".,,_+�'-Via.-�+.;,:�«�.`-"_- _
1
pn,1-1 v 1^3:1
. PETITION
DEPT OF PLANNIN G
To the City of Apache Junction, Honorable Mayor, and M DEVELOPMENT
City Council Members:
1 a a` Planning Department✓
Engineering Department
Building Department
Public Works Department
We the property owners and residents of Apache Ho sub-
division are not in favor of the City of Apache Junction
putting South Thunderbird Drive into a 80 foot thoroughfare
to Broadway Avenue. This would create a terrific traffic
problem at the main intersection of West Apache Trail and
Thunderbird Dr. Also, it would create a raceway which
would be hard to control and could be injurious to any
small children in the area.
Do not develop in this manner for the traffic control lights
that are being installed now is where the traffic should
be regulated to.
Take a look at Mesa and Scottsdale and Tempe. They have
many developments of apartments and they do not dump
-.-,;._. � � i "_ their heavy traffic onto short side streets but let it go
ma's" r Ak on to their major arteries to flow faster and not create
major traffic bottlenecks.
We the residents and property owners of the Apache Ho Sub-
- division hope that you will look at this situation very
thoughtfully and not create a major traffic hazzard.
Apache Ho Residents and Property Owners:
Name /�( s/ Addr s Date
� ��6 1x�/ G� a� /l, -. mil��
__ .
) /.. --,/ ci. —�-- -2 7 r s., ,/. A,-�.-.-e/ Pam- '- -)V-X
/,ao, .__ _1 yr.p_, :2 4 2 .41), ,i.4.- "1-4-t+/ 40, .2- Y_1 4/
•
I UI<i il 14,1x, 93 7 1 i 4ISc,.-/o l .1-1 Y-(r
.-cam 3 37 S Tfui-vih(a dvi -2 q
/J,/.,-0 - a y col 6`!Zu i. th�,,` , GO)f. ,7 -.2 ,ed
4:6 y ,,; sd �� ��r c� �' �G �y- ice'
'1-81 S.`I'1v/-n11-t ;t1 R9 --J...24-69
A -2Y-2'f
• j , eG,,, ,6 —7- ,v/„..�� ti/ . - ,!_ e'l
J / ) _e ) i e -, .i-- _ -/.
C72::::
am' C'� ._rn ,. 1 r> .)4 r :1. 4 /' x- - 3=Li
/4P S /:/,.,,..�c -4,,Ld ___ -,---Z- -Y y
- '/ ✓ �� -�. �� 1 `11 < 7Az, /„-_,„i 2-2-5 �-y
_ z. .� ).l,,,l ,y,, //)//,, ///..5 l'i ,,,<, ,� -.r/
cc./
i • ` ,
+:-_ -r'�� _- .. :-.- .-` Lf I:.- /1 / 1,.ii— ti./ f `. h !z-.-t' 2 -2.-, — ,cr 1--/
^ 01\
I
' ',-: .. .
NAME 7 . ADDRESS DATE
. .
c
.;-i------,/if
_ <
. c 6 ,z. ,,- _
- 1 C.(, '1.0. "1"(I, OA.?
il. . ci-4-1_ 4_ •-..62 q- SC) 771.t.,yae)---p,. r--d 0 P- .2_,."--.grif ,
- _-_.„ :.•• • :- - - .- •• ., •: t-e 0-A..if.4. )2)`t<J14., 975./0 6614'at._e A -..2 5 -24
I —-- -- :- - - :- : • , _ :..-. '..
de4i
• _z ,T .. .,, ' . , .-. - 2., irew /ei. 17-eie
&7 • ..±;‘,z-..e. , . .?_--..-,z5-___-efe(_.,_
el Z
:•-,,„ , „ _ :. . • • .• 7--,:-,,•••
• - - •' --- --- - - -. ::-.• .
<t----? 72- 07-
. ./
ge • St .. ry
. cit.., ._.. ..:,„....A.... .._c.9--e• C ..„......
--414 ioqiii!.1.!LIK.4*.wftoz4..--...!- --*.i..- :t:,-4-•,..H:,;'!.*4.:;:Q _ Ar,.. a,/,0 7.)„,_._,4,-.. 3 te / .: ._ 0,
.4, . (....) ./414. 4_4., 3 S's- .5' Ca—d,..-4 clgz- /5'73
a .
..,. „ -,:2. -, ,_ , .,., - -.•.. '-.
• ,•a as —.I h.tt,.! S
_ .. . . . .
- - • , - .a.. a diii/Mr. . , -•.i ,_. APF 0 P ,;)_.1
•,, .. • . _- •
4, ' All,II A M•I I WAII Lra E I Ir %
- • ...• ..d 4 ...• '1,1 '.(''2'1'6-.2/ / -3 _IC-r"
- 4: -) ."'S 07.- 9// s 0: ,/• .1 2- zr-Sy _
.. „_.:2,• , :
.- J. tb( / ?--c-Y--7-c2,..„-- .(s-F_ A j.,. fe„),_
hi 5 et- 5 g„„ .L..../ . ?s- d, I
... qte-tri. 4/1 j-Pit.-,
n V,0-„,_e_. 6/ 5 ,* ectA.6_ -2- , 41-
- _ -
_
5i,... :. f4/e6-y i,;, ;
L- -- —
3,
-.-:•:,-.;,.-.• -,1.' i :,,.:, - ‘ . '
D
S8 i CA_). "."ie no I 2.-26- 8_=-1 _
Ti) 6 , (301 Lk/ 3%z9 TWO.,
-1 0 lig?,dr q i,e, 141 2::,-1 I ea- e ;2- - -).•C— ef-s- _
'.-.
- . -.-,... .. S. 1 'AA., iJg .2- , -4,
.. . • :._. • .-.
t/ - 7 ..-7,---?9,-z, 4.t .-..,./ t_ 2_ -1) i.,/ _
....=
AD 4te,e Avot.vii ."1,e• 2-2.,c-ey
• 4,01,07/4
c 7- 0-S- -8 Y
s ,. ,: .
_-0._QpicAt .aps 9 Iwo L..) 144h Cthe..,. _
„c•L A/ 14/_.... „. "L.__ 2- •-t si-s.v _______
1 L-,-.:--,, ,, .7::- , i ::, ,,.:1.7. igif-".. ../N‘Af4diftfill i.I i 2 ,,,-- . ....,,, .../ - - _
Lic...6.4.1 i C°1 9-S ts— ult.-t` ,,/c- -
ili
411 . T .u-
_a_ .__,. ....L.,,r_.....CL___
//R 9 S ->,-...04_,..,, );1, .2, -,,t7 - WH-
... .,'", ,r—,,. --,
//g2' I 9/eF,L _ _
( 1•41.,.._„,„ .1.1,teP.- ',._p /,r s 1.... /../....1, 2,017
--51,i.-- 4wItii -7,-F:4;.:• :=._:•,,,,.:------,..:;!. -:-',i, .
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
BOX 1240 - 235 S THUNDERBIRD
Pastor APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85220
602-982-2155
10 April 1984
TO: Apache Junction City Planning and Zoning Commission.
By vote of the church, 1st Baptist Church of Apache Junction, Arizona, the
trustees acting in behalf of the 1st Baptist Church, recommends the following:
1 . A 8.9 acre parcel located on the west and east sides of Thunderbird
Drive, 300 feet south of Apache Trail in Section 20 be rezoned from GR
(General Rural ) to CB-1 . Listed below are some reasons for this recommen-
dation and why the church does not want CB-2 zoning.
a. CB-2 allows open businesses which could include among many
others, a "go-cart" track with it' s accompanying excessive noise or a
junk yard which would be very detrimental to the church and it' s purpose
in the community.
2. We further request the following:
a. That water drainage not be changed.
b. That there will not be Dumpsters at the back of our building
which would create an eyesore.
c. That if a package liquor store be in the plans, that it be 300
feet or more from our property. -
W ' ne Mi gan;,Trustee
Holly'Smith, Trustee
Steve Bennett, Trustee
/6►,
,, f
March 27, 1984
\- ;\ 3
c.:5
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Apache Junction, Arizona '��
1001 North Idaho Road , {
Apache Junction, Arizona 85220
Honorable Commission Members:
Please accept this letter as a formal protest against the proposed rezoning
case PZ5-84 Proposed Ordinance #258 rezoning from General Rural to CB-2 the
reasons given are:
1. I feel there should be a buffer between CB-2 and the present residential
area.
2. It would not be in the best interest to the general public living in
this area.
3. Certain types of businesses would not be in the best interest of the
church located on South Thunderbird.
Legal description attached.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Respectfully,
William E. McDaniel
My property is located at 198 S. Thunderbird, Tract D, Apache Ho Unit 1.
All of the following; EXCEPT the north 300 feet;
That part of the Southwest Z of Section 20, Township 1 North,
Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache
Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, described as follows:
From the interior quarter-section corner of said Section 20;
thence S. 89° 58' 12" W. along the east-west quarter line of
said Section 20, 828.66 feet to the point of beginning on the
centerline of Carney Avenue (a.k.a. Thunderbird Drive), a
roadway recorded in Docket 276, Page 322, records of Pinal
County; thence S. 89° 58' 12" W. along said east-west
quarter line, 491.69 feet to a point at the northwest corner
of the Northeast 1 of the Southwest % of said Section 20;
thence S. 0° 07' 11" E. along the west boundary of said
Northeast 14 of the Southwest 14 of said Section 20, 660.00
feet; thence S. 89° 57' 56" E., 348.90 feet to a point which
lies N. 0° 00' 00" E., 12.19 feet from the northwest corner
of APACHE HO UNIT ONE, a subdivision recorded in Book 9 of
Maps, Page 59, records of Pinal County; thence S. 0° 00' 00"
W. , 12.19 feet to the northwest corner of said APACHE HO UNIT
ONE; thence N. 89° 59' 16" E. along the north boundary of said
APACHE HO UNIT ONE, 141.41 feet to a point on the prolongation
southward of the centerline of said Carney Avenue (a.k.a.
Thunderbird Drive); thence N. 0° 00' 00" E. , 672.23 feet along
the centerline of said Carney Avenue to a point of beginning;
EXCEPT the right-of-way of Highway 60-70-80-89.
_'fir
1110.11,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ITEM NO . 4
CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 258 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE FIRST READING .
PUBLIC HEARING
1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 263,
PZ-10-84 THE APPLICANT IS LOEWENSTEIN
2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION,
3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT,
WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING
THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME ,
4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS ,
7. ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S
JUDGEMENT)
A. APPLICANT
B. IN FAVOR
C. OPPOSED
4( PYP1/40
H6.
✓o
. O
U f(: _ z
'gRIZO P u/Zt2� U� ace �2��'LCtZU�2
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
April 11 , 1984
Approver for Agenda
/`�`-�>
D1ato Item #
MEMORANDUM/TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading 5/// 1 -13--
Second Psathng
THROUGH: �%' 'J MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ Public Hearing
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR _ Otd Business
FROM: 1 JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER New Business
t��� Consent Agenda
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-10-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 263)
MAY 1 , 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 15, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case number PZ-10-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 263, is a request
by the applicants Donna and Robert Loewenstein to rezone their property
from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH); and from GR General
Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 10.8 acre
parcel located at the northeast corner of Broadway and Ironwood in
Section 20. It is designated General Commercial on the General Plan.
Surrounding land uses include travel trailer parks, businesses, homes,
and vacant land.
Planning Department Comments
The staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west fifty
feet (50' ) and the south fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for
public roadway and associated purposes, and a sixty foot (60' ) right-
of-way for the West Fourth Avenue alignment.
The applicants own the existing VIP Trailer Park to the north. It is
their desire to extend that use further south. Hence, the area proposed
for TH zoning is the area proposed for the trailer park extension. The
General Plan appears to designate this strip for Commercial . The fixing
of the land use designation boundaries has been flexible with the City,
however. Through negotiations with the applicant' s attorney and staff, it
was agreed that the area for TH zoning would be within a reasonable inter-
pretation of the General Plan Land Use Plan. The area would serve further
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-10-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 263)
April 11 , 1984
Page Two
to act as a buffer between future commercial uses and existing residential
uses to the east.
The applicants' property fronting directly along Ironwood Drive, however,
must be zoned General Commercial in accordance with the General Plan.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of April 10,
1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion:
(M/S Taylor/Sansone 6-0-0)
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-10-84, also
known as Proposed Ordinance No. 263, application of Donna and
Robert Loewenstein for their property described as, a matter of
public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to
CB-2 General Business Zone and Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that
the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council
the approval of said application.
"Any stipulations or recommendations are:
1 . The applicant dedicate the west fifty feet (50' ) and the
south fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for public
roadway and associated purposes, and a sixty foot (60' )
right-of-way for the West Fourth Avenue alignment.
2. In the TH section of the rezoning, the applicant will
construct and enclose the area with a six foot (6' )
masonry wall .
3. The maximum units to be placed on the TH rezoning will
be 72 units.
"The reasons for this recommendation are:
1 . The basic rezoning is compatible with the General Plan.
2. It will act as a buffer with Ironwood and the residential
area to the east."
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO. 263
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-10-84 , application of Donna and
Robert Loewenstein
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 263
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
. _ PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); AND FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL
BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY,
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL.
1. The applicant dedicate the west fifty feet (50') and the south
fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and
associated purposes, and a sixty foot (60') right-of-way for the
West Fourth Avenue alignment.
2. In the TH section of the rezoning, the applicant will construct and
enclose the area with a six foot (6' ) masonry wall.
3 The maximum units to be placed on the TH rezoning will be 72 units.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE:
OPTIONAL CHOICES
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference "
b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons.)
c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
out for the City Clerk.)
Ans.
ORDINANCE NO 263
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER
HOMESITE ZONE (TH), AND FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE,
REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
m-•a +.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT-
.
SECTION I IN GENERAL
The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning
Map for the parcels of land described as
Parcel No. 1: (from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone)
_ The South 350 feet of the West 1 of the West 2 of the West 1 of
the Southwest of Section 20, Township 1 North, Range 8 East,
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal
County, Arizona, and
Parcel No. 2 (from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone)
Beginning 350 feet North of the Southwest corner of Section 20;
thence North along the west line 1300 02 feet, thence South
89° 53' 07" East 165 feet, thence South 300 21 feet, thence
South 9° 27' 44" East 60.83 feet, thence South 939 82 feet, thence
u� ems. ,- North 89° 53' 50" West 175 feet to the point of beginning, in
Section 20, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River
Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; and
Parcel No. 3 (from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH))
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 20; thence North
along the west line 350 feet; thence South 89° 53' 50" East
175 feet to the true point of beginning, thence North 1240 03 feet,
thence South 89° 53' 07" East 164 88 feet; thence South 0° 00' 25"
West 1301.43 feet, thence North 89° 53' 50" West 154.73 feet to
the true point of beginning, in Section 20, Township 1 North,
Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction,
Pinal County, Arizona,
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), and from GR General
Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the
£j applicants dedicate the west fifty feet (50') and the south fifty feet
(50') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes,
and a sixty foot (60') right-of-way for the West Fourth Avenue alignment.
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
are hereby repealed.
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19
Wendell J Clarke
Mayor
11.
ORDINANCE NO. 263
PAGE TWO OF TWO
ATTEST:
. — — • Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
„ •. _ „ . APPROVED AS TO FORM
•-
.• .
•
• „ •„.
• •
) C (.\\
David F A 'exander
City Attorney
- .
. ,
_. . .
- ,
- . .
- . .
. ,
1
r
PZ-10-84
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 263)
PARCEL 1: PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE
PARCEL 2: PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE
PARCEL 3: PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH)
WEST APACHF�TRAI1
1 1
.. „.._.............„__ ... . i 1 CB-2 I
L_
za
1_r _
itw
o
CD
I 1 =
1 F-
i 0
o
1
I
I 4FS l ZNU 4vu UE—t
B=Ii T--
' /B-I 1 TH
I I
1
cJl i WEST 4TH AVENUE
' I
I
1 N/1—
J
U r'l /�
/Q W/ I W
sees 1 c oII
I p 1 a
1 g t r,_. -, 1
' 3 1 v I--
1
e�if+a /a,. '+:.w ,,..,1 ,tn.,v_ I U �IoL%J '_!::IL:i
/i:
h1 /
WEST BROADWAY AVENUE
�—" I 1------�r*---- ---ti
II IIII
I CR-3 I I CB-1/PDI1 TH/PD I
I --I I 1
- U a I 1 I
�1 L__1:_-- --- -J
L-- --J
SUBJECT SITES
LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GR GENERAL RURAL)
SCALE. 1"=300'
_-- . -*jai::x� ;. Meg/sr/N(7 JroA aS
- _ PZ-10-84
}-;; -- (PROPOSED ORDINANCE No. 253)
_ . -. .. _ PARCEL CE L 1:• PR
OPOSED
OPO ED REZ
ONING I NG FROM GR GENERA
L RURAL
L T o CB_2 GENE
RAL
BUSINE
SS
SS Z0 r- PARCEL 2 PROPOSEDREZONINGFROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS Zor
PARCEL 3: PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (Ti-
____
. =
•
I 4-..
�< C:-2
c w
7 •.., r ,•
t J
_ • o
= H
f cj
O
N
_ —
1
- lir
11 /_ H UE
B
.
__,.-....,....,..,,.._.__-_,-__. ._.__._-._,.„.^.,..„...,_........,_„
1
,.,,.,._,.,:„:._....-.„:,__.:.,:.,„,...,
i11.._..
// 1
_..
- - ---
I WEST 4TH AVENUE
I
i
R-
cs� *L t Ott i „. k ::.t.
Ili' 1
1� �hf.�, • s ,_ t. Ta twr � 4�� y;„ ^. J_ M +.
>_ f
47.
-.'"---‹ft.- r '-. -.47 /
S .Mw••.sY.• 3
a� r y_.. I I . T.
.- } 1 i'r� t 17JI�f
:j
A.illii Mr.
r ._.. *. ---,i ___—_ __.�
•
_ ;- t - I CB-1/PDI TN/PD
"ham _ =y ..r.e..^ral __![I M.. ..__ �J
- [j SUBJECT SITES
LIMITS OF ZON_NG (REMAINDER IS GR GENERAL RURAL)
,;•-- -1 : - - - - SCALE: 1"=300'
1
AIM
4111116,
•
•
•
•
� t- `k •�� ,:'X.N�y Yy, ,ta, y5 �4' '#' '_`.L "�" :z ��+;"r` '''tas ? 2 �}-r�k.-' .u'Y �r's 3 n •.5.;
1
ITEM NO . 5
CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 263 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE FIRST READING .
PUBLIC HEARING
1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 264,
PZ-11-84 . THE APPLICANT IS RIDENHOUR
2 , WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL
AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION .
3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT,
WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING
THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME .
4 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN
OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME)
6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS .
7. ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S
JUDGEMENT)
A , APPLICANT
B. IN FAVOR
C . OPPOSED
II IN.
�F�Gri/S1C
4/
o�
//, o
gR/Z014P' vDity o f C ache &unction
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
April 11 , 1984
MEMORANDU TA: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-11-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 264)
MAY 1 , 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
MAY 15, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case number PZ-11-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 264, is a
request by the applicants Guy and Dorothy Ridenhour to rezone their
property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH). The
site is a developed 1 .25 acre parcel located on the south side of
Shiprock Street, 165 feet east of Main Drive in Section 18. It is
designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan.
Surrounding land uses include mobile homes and a vacant parcel .
Planning Department Comments
The Planning Department finds that this rezoning would be consistent
with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for
the site.
Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north thirty-
three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated
purposes. ��//
Approver for Agenda i`"e--
ate Item #
First Reading �/ —4__.
Second Reading
V..--Public Hearing
Old Business
New Business
Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
au+ /►
The Honorable Mayoi nd City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-11-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 264)
April 11 , 1984
Page Two
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of
April 10, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following
motion: (M/S Taylor/Conway 6-0-0)
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-11-84, also
known as Proposed Ordinance No. 264, application of Guy and Dorothy
Ridenhour for their property described as, a matter of public
record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer
Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache
Junction City Council the approval of said application.
"Any stipulations or recommendations are:
The applicant dedicate the north thirty-three feet (33' )
of the subject property for public roadway and associated
purposes.
"The reasons for this recommendation are:
1 . The rezoning does comply with the General Plan of
Apache Junction.
2. It is compatible with the surrounding area."
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
/.•
r
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO 264
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-11-84 application of
Guy and Dorothy Ridenhour
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 264 ,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
_ PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-11-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO
TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS,
= AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL.
The applicant dedicate the north thirty-three feet (33') of the
subject property for public roadway and associated purposes
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE
OPTIONAL CHOICES
a "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference."
b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
•
reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons.)
c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
out for the City Clerk.)
a'tYr i'7'.i' 'G^uoY j.�:*�,;....A..:•t-.`..`•_.�.�4.�_a:,f._
Assik. ono.,
ORDINANCE NO 264
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-11-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER
HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY.
?: ,- z?: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT.
SECTION I IN GENERAL
` The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona,
Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as
The East § of the Northwest i of the Southwest # of the
Northeast } of the Southeast ; of Section 18, Township 1
North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian,
Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona,
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the
stipulation that the applicant dedicate the north thirty-three feet (33' )
of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
ti _ s- are hereby repealed.
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19
Wendell J Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST.
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
N,,,,,,. /Xd e L,-+�j
ttorney /
/
PZ-11-84
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 264)
PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH)
+66'
rn
N
N
132' 330' 165'
WEST SHIPROCK STREET
( 99' 231 ' TH
' 9 l0
9 j L
132' Q 132' 165' 165' 165' i
• 0
` a r TH
s
Vol
to!
Z L
WEST ROUNDUP STREET
•
SCALE: 1" = 200'
N SUBJECT SITE
LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GR GENERAL RURAL)
x _
1i:i=7'?;=."-;: :A:r 14-e Ks. .1s_-4ij
to"k
I
! • . „
- - I. • • . , .
-.•.•"--- -cf--V4it.,-...;c, ',,. ', ....-,•• • ,,'....- ...•,. !I .
- ,4 72:-.--s..,:is--e.s*:',;-"s-.. .,;,,..•.....'e.\--.-..,..•,:st.,•:-.7..,-..--,"",";-.,•
..„;, ,,,,alk,,i7.,,,,,,, frr,...e...,e,!...V...44,..,,,,,,r_ ,..•:-. . •
-' :-....'-'.::--.. A • - _. .
' PZ-11-84
4...--_ .:•,, .• ......,:,•. -
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 264)
.-.
- -- -.
-4f A,-z,:t-i-k-:-• •-.1,..--.....4.,,-„4-,-,
•',...--,.,•: -.-;=.7,-!..4.:;=:-,,, 5,...-.--..'t•-•;',- :- ..' ..........--.... PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH)
.--i':-...-:-,,...•--"--,:i.,..„,-- -_,„:7_,---..:,..-7•••••,-,,,•-:....-.4—.,:c.
'f"-••,.--'-.-.-7,-'7.._'•-- -- , -,.' _.,•„..,.. . , ..
,,,'' ..7'::::::-. 4-.---•::___ - •-,
1-•-•,- ---7:-.7.4:N.t.'..;..--.-g.5,--..17..tif.„.-Aig...6.. .
'
-." -,-..t;',,:".4''':-.--"...':%-'--•,7-'". "---".•:•-:•:--., -F-._-.------;'--..--'^ .
-••-'....,.--,:;.-:-.1.^...-...•,-...7-.,-:•..--....,-,-.. ..,.. ,-,----,-,--,-,.....-',..;,,, -,
.,r;sp..47,,itt",24:4. -.;*,*.,‘,... 5•:-.,±44 .....:.--,..7c ,..),,f ••
',. -..:.'',.--'...;:if- .41'...:--•-. ,-••••••=..:, -.:'. i7-•,-..'!'''', '
',:: :54S.r.,-'447::-.:`'.- -:S..:-.::::-;;.•.-: 'S.....:;-.i.,:;
MI
".... .. :`,7" 's.'2,i:::t.r.:',---,7-'1,-"-,-.:4:-,----•- •_..::-.,;:-"X-r!.."';41.1, .E;(4.577N4 Ro41 -s"
_,-, -_--_,,-;- -_-__,...-_-,-_, .,7-•--, :.c.,-•..;•,.%0''.::„..:,...z-.,5..
---.S.::. •-------,'7,:,..:,.. .-,...;,...,...--.17,..__,---f-''..=:..:.„-..:.,_.:-.?,-...,,,,L.-%.,...7.
-.••-,-,-::-:. -7--7---,-.--, -,...... .§Fit..---:-.-;-_--,T.7-..---7,--f-,,_-_-- .f:_-
,---7 --- - •- '-- . 66'
•,'-r., ,...:;-:re---,; .-•!-!------, .._-.------------1- -, . -,.:,
to 6
•-• E.-,.
: -lei: -+-=1--.--..,-,•::-..42%-.:":";'7.,;7..;•17.1'. :,N,.
:,---,,- r--.-- --...--,.;..•,•-•.-;•••••- -
. _ ._ • ii..., 1---
01
', • - CV
V3
•ty/- ;.----417...--?-s--F-,-,..--_,4.44,-,•44,,,_--4,-;7.-.-:,-..----,:--,_,,-..,:•••• - I:,-..
. /43
fl 132' 330' 165'
• - --
-._ .
.-.3,-, ....,-,...,,-;,,V*7_.Wf.`..,...kl'L---,=.:::•-:- .:4"*4.`‘,..4 .... .....3
-',07,-,"-ta,.=.17.2,-„:...i-..1F.:•.-%-'4::•.',..,`",.7i.,. .,-1-,',7.,••:.-;•••'..._-•,.• .....
••.,--.....;:iL..•-.4-,......4.,,oev.4".:.,..,IN-'•--'-'•,7-:-.-41.-^...,.t-n"-:z.-,-,- -CV
VI. ..„ . . .
Qe`••• %-..::"..'....--.. ...,: ."' ..'.:!.....:-7- .,_ ?:,.." . : .-
- - 99' 231 i TH- -; •,
t!.:.. T.... /
Cr.
•.•
In ..,':. •
. i .If.'..'1.-....-7•"'-'----i i-"-,,''''-'''-,•••-tsf:' .4....^ ..--,..,.7..-I.,:^`:', tip
I' -...r.. .,- .:::'-.-, a.-...,,..•,.='''''.'-'•,'-'''...!-...:f:b..;;;;;; 11:7-Z1' AL 7. -,,7",;,,,,••„ ., ....... •....-..7...-.-. -".:",-,,z,---,..e. ,fr-i...'6. PT- r-132' '1
-.1---7: 132' 165' 165' 1 i"' 165' i
,.......-....,-...,....-_-2_,.,....fer„:0-..4,7...4:-....i.:4-,..,„:„....,..,...-., ,.... . ..
I t 4-•4."'Et.:.:.i.,...:::..,:t..r.--A--..----,,i,:.,- -r.e,......:,;.:.....,.:,•iie 7=.....,.. -•••••; , -
co
.....,-4..,:,*-:. -.;7:, ,-,.„,...,-..z.:.-.4...4.7.i.,:,,-,.....,-,..-,,,,..;,-;.g-,,,4.:i :: • 4,0....of' ......,"..ttt;Crfrit.e.::,,r.-....:,.-.:-,7',..;•.7,-,..y.i.-....-,-;7..4
TH i
,• , 7..„:„,,.......,..,...p.-.- . ...:,....,,...,..:4,..„-r,„......4. , .._ 4
0
:-.•:,*----•---,,,,,,,t,2 .....2.----t- --•....-..4.'..-.74.,::
7:- 0.i.,, ,...,Z4...: cn ..
••P':!.4,i...-7..5---'''ZZ.t..:'1..r.?.;14.,"644AV41.4.13,....," ...,,,,,,ft VI, U31
17"'-.',"."...-`..-7^•'&:....7,•4, .- ,.';',:1-,:Z..:,....'•;:::.'1."71.7.1:), :7 t-'.,...*',Arr..--;',.7........:.‘..."... ::_r-..-....1:--,._......4.-4-:....-.....*:..sa ., ....-
44:::: ---A. -,. .1.1..,2.':',....-:--,...4.....;.-- --.;...+-X•rr.--,-f-%:•_•..: :',,t•P.".. ''r•; 1 1
-.„:,,•:! .-ker..74.47.4....f..,..-.i•--Atez.,--...-..,_.-.---:...i.,........",......,",,‘,..•••••!,••St. •-•
7t•••••;-:'-'-‘7'4"=;--?.4•15 -'7.,.•:.:-". 0-4.-7. -1(4. f,,,..,,,,,... I.
;..;:..7"i..-,1.-f--*d5';;;-.;i77.r...:: -.;:-;kz-1:4;74. ;"•,.t.i 4..*-i,T.,,4,-tik• 1,7•,-.',. •.•::: -'., r..=....-"'- ' .:- . _.4....-1;,-'.-,,'F-i-'..r..-- :•.,•......
. "..4_•.'.;','-".:1'.'.'•.'71i .-•..--;AP-.. ...,'.f.'i,::-7. `7--i.:---.,i-;-4,..^4 -.41,*,1 u„;:ti.i..j, :;- '..,., :'. .., • .... ..,..,-,r.-..-...i.',...Sr.,--1.'''''''. '. •
"Z's;; ;;:4-14F4.3.*AteW044.*iFAr..6"4•.... •-
.:,...,„.7.-.,;,..-- .r..i...',.4 ...:-..! ,,--.•.''2",„::::!: -,:•
• - -
'7.1'17i";•7•:•.c.e'li:•"",:.• - '-'7'..1.7:44'. •-..4.4:.:•.4..,..
-,,F..,•,,,.:,,i•vt.7-.,,i'I: '4'...,..::••• . ,*'-',.... '• 4.., ,..,..1.
%•-•,'..,.
.-....- ' - - ...1....4,
• •
. ..
. 1
...
- '''' SCALE: 1" = 200'
1 • .. i
4 • ?-- - .
:.:.54"...--,-.1,.....ii....,,, -___ ,-_.. --1-.'•-:-..-,...4 q N or
SUBJECT SITE
- -,.;••±..i.-_•-.5-'1,-, t-';.:.-. .... ..../4---.
.•
- I - MI••...
.• .. i I LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDPR IS GR GENERAL RURAL)
I--1
, •I:P. .,....
•
•. .
'.1'. % 4:
—-----
•
•
01111111/4
•
•
•
ITEM NO . 6
CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 264 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE FIRST READING .
PUBLIC HEARING
1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF
SERIES 7 LIOUOR LICENSE
THE APPLICANT IS PATRICIA ELLEN GUNN FOR WEST-WINDS RESTAURANT
2, IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS
BEHALF AT THIS TIME,
3, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON
THIS ISSUE?
4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE
PUBLIC,
i �\
Qp.CHF
C1
U `r "� 1,,1 ill Z
gR1ZONP (= it y 4Apache c&unction
April 25 , 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PLACEMENT---APPLICATION FOR
PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 7,
WEST-WINDS RESTAURANT
In accordance with the procedures for processing appli-
cations for liquor licenses , notice was posted on the
premises at 2885 West Superstition Blvd . , Apache
Junction, on the llth day of April, 1984, by the Deputy
City Clerk . The notice remained posted for twenty (20)
days, during which time written arguments in favor of or
in opposition to the proposed license were to be filed
with the City Clerk. As of this date , there have been
no objections addressed to the City on this matter .
Correspondence was received from the Director of Public
Safety and the Director of Public Works, a copy of which
is attached . The next step in the procedure is for the
Council to hold a public hearing on the application and
make recommendation for approval or disapproval to the
State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control.
Respectfully submitted ,
I- f1`2�� px_ L Approver for Agenda
Kathleen Connelly /D�a�e���� Item M
City Clerk First Reading `S____ _ —I--
Second Reading
✓ Public Hearing
lvc Old Business
New Business
Attachment Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
AM ba AM.
r,CHE ✓G DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
U �; y O
r
qPIZOW' itd o p ache 09unction
�
W.E McDANIEL
Director
Aftwk
April 18, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk - Kathy Connelly
FROM: Director of Public Safety 044.
William E. McDaniel
SUBJECT: Application for Person
Transfer of a Series 7
Liquor License, West-Winds Restaurant
Upon making the necessary investigation, this department can find no
reason to deny the transfer of series 7 liquor license for Ms. Patricia
Ellen Gunn an agent for West-Winds Restaurant, located at 2885 West
Superstition Blvd. , Apache Junction, Arizona.
/al
1001 NORTH IDAHO RD. • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260
czq cApache @9unct:'n
INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 19, 1984
1160
TO: City Clerk THRU:
FROM: Director of Public Works 1�
SUBJECT: Person Transfer of Series 7 Liquor License
West-Winds Restaurant
A field inspection of the site was made on April 18th. No objection is
expressed to this application.
RWB:sh
Ref: 304.09
STATE OF ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
Date of Posting: April 11, 1984
Applicant: Patricia Ellen Gunn , for West-Winds Restaurant
Address of Premises: 2885 West Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, Arizona 85220
License(s) Applied for: Person Transfer of Series 7 Liquor License
I hereby certify that pursuant to Section 4-201, A.R.S., I did post notice in
a conspicuous place on the premises concerning the above liquor license(s) and
said notice shall remain posted for a period of at least 20 consecutive days.
Signature of City/County Clerk or Representative:
f 1_ ei J
/yLeZ2L- del, (Je/t,d�
Dated:
41/2,1Lp //, /7 /
Return this affidavit with your recommendation and any related petitions to:
Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
1645 West Jefferson, Suite 227
Phoenix, AZ 85007
*For text of Section 4-201, A.R.S., please see reverse.
REV 8/81
FORM 128
,v\CHE
r"6° c' a G2
rt mY
4z .
�R�zs cpity o� �pacI2e unction
April 11 , 1984
NOTICE
The attached application for a Person Transfer of a Series 7
Liquor License, by Patricia Ellen Gunn agent for West-Winds
Restaurant , 2885 West Superstition Blv . , Apache Junction,
Arizona, was posted by the Deputy City Clerk on the 11th day
of April, 1984, at 2: 30 p.m.
Any person who is a bona fide resident of the age of nineteen
(19) years or more , residing , owning or leasing property
within one half (1/2) mile radius from the proposed premises
to be licensed , may file written arguments in favor thereof ,
or objections thereto with the City Clerk at City Hall within
twenty (20) days after the date of posting . No arguments
for , nor against, shall be filed thereafter .
A public hearing will be held Tuesday , May 1 , 1984 , at the
City Council Chambers , 1001 North Idaho Road , Apache
Junction, Arizona, at 7:00 p.m. , at which time any objections
filed will be heard. ,..
X-41.....62- dx....x.,gai
Kathleen Connelly "
City Clerk
lvc
Attachments
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
s4 vs,-
FORM 120 -D.L L C USE ONLY-
._ 5 _- _ REV 7/at
.. - .. •• STATE OF ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL
-- - - 1645 WEST JEFFERSON SUITE 227
PHOENIX AZ 85007 f, , ;;ILPT A
602/2555141 'O 33 HIA'`•q
APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE MaR 3
:Type of print with black ink. 1
NOTE PROCESSING OF MOST APPLICATIONS TAKES 60 DAYS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
OFTEN RESULT IN A LONGER WAITING PERIOD THEREFORE YOU ARE
�` x�.,.:...•z-,x -;.' r ti� CAUTIONED REGARDING EXTENSIVE FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS PLANS FOR
_� - - A GRAND OPENING ETC. BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF THE
LICENSE
SECTION 1 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A.
ATTACH A XEROX COPY OF CHECK M.O. ETC
_ - _ El NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 14 15 Reviewed by Accepted by
[MASON TRANSFER Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 9 14 15 Current file flagged by
0 LOCATION TRANSFER Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 10 14 15 Copies made for posting by
-, 0 NEW AGENT FOR CORP OR CLUB Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 11 14 15 Copies mailed for posting by Dat
.... - - 0 PROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 12 14 15)fee not required) Copies for background by• Date/
0 GOVERNMENT LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Comments. w n 1,75--.
SECTION 2 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP WI lam. ) nA
LNDIV)DUAL Complete Section? ❑CLUB Complete Section fffP/1a`/ G
CLAIM• T.R • R DATE CODE AMT
_ - - - 0 PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 7 0 GOVERNMENT
- - 0 CORPORATION Complete Section 8 ❑OTHER explain
- _ SECTION 3 APPLICANT (AII applicants must complete this Section) ,��(/)
1 APPLICANT'S OR AGENT'S NAME CL/A/A/ /771/C/A e/44/
- .- (Insert one name only-to appear on License) Last Name First Name Middle
a" ': L 2 CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP NAME
Enter exact name as it appears on Articlesle of Inc or Partnership Agreement
3 BUSINESS NAME _ _ //e S 7✓- f///1/C /`� 1
/s 5 joex./VJ]L
_ - Enter ex
ex..ct name as itit appears on the exterior of premises
crp
4 BUSINESS ADDRESS. (S U7-.�..." ,F,Qsj/row Sidic.
' //'�f Do not use P 0 Box'Number �/J^ p
- - .. - 5. CITY /,/f��CNE /G'T COUNTY. /-/NAG ZIP CODE.O✓-�.2
- - 6. MAILING ADDRESS yr p pS /41,57 -i�rscRS//oN 4A/eiCITY• ENE ',l-1 7 STATE At ZIP CODE:BSas`
-_ 7 IS THE BUSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OF THE ABOVE CITY OR TOWN EKES ❑NO
SECTION 4 INDICATE LICENSE SERIES Check only one,use separate form for each license
NOTE EFF. 07/24/82 non-refundable NEW LICENSE FEES
application fees are$l00 00 You must Total Due if Filed Total Due if Filed Person to Person Locatir
SERIES ADD an additional S50.00 to ft.-es listed Nov 1 May 15 : May 16 Oct 31 Transfer Fee Annual Renewal I Transfer
below
0 1 DISTILLERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1,900.00 : 1325.00 550.00 350.00 150.0(
0 2 BREWERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1,900.00 1 725.00 550.00 350.00 150.0(
0 3 VINTNERS LICENSE IIN STATE) 1 700.00 1,625.00 350.00 150.00 150.01
0 4 WHOLESALER ALL LIQUORS 1,800.00 I 1675.00 550.00 250.00 150.0
�',-, -141 etiiii 05 WHOLESALER WINE AND BEER 1,650.00 I 1,600.00 250.00 100.00 150.0
❑6 ON-SALE RETAILER ALL LIQUORS 1 700.00 I 1,650.00 350114 150.00 150.0
�-G
- - ON-SALE RETAILER WINE AND BEER 425.00 t 38750 "201f.00 75.00 150.0
❑8 ON-SALE RETAILER,BEER 275.00 26250 100.00 25.00 150.0
❑9 OFF SALE RETAILER ALL LIQUORS 1100.00 I 1,050.00 150.00 L0.30 150.0
. - ❑ 10 OFF SALE RETAILER WINE AND BEER 400.00 I 375.00 150.00 50.00 150.0
❑11 OFF SALE RETAILER BEER 275.00 262.50 100.00 25.00 150.0
•
.. ❑12 RAILROAD TRAIN LICENSE 1 775.00 1 662.50 500.00 225.00 150.0
0 13 AIRLINE LICENSE 1 775.00 1,662.50 500.00 225.00 150.0
❑ 14 PRIVATE CLUB LICENSE 1 200,00 I 1 125.00 150.00 150.0
- --. - - - 0 15 HOTEL/MOTEL LICENSE Complete Section 2,050.00 I 1,800.00 • 500.00
_ 0 16 RESTAURANT LICENSE Complete Section 6 2,050.00 I 1,800.00 • 500.00 •
. - 0 17G GOVERNMENT LICENSE 250.00 200.00 • 100.00 •
•
- - 0 171 DISTILLERS LICENSE TOUT OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.(
0 IB BREWERS LICENSE(OW OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.(
0 19 VINTNERS LICENSE(OUT OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.(
❑20 IMPORTER EXPORTER OR RECTIFIER 300.00 I 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.(
Not Permitted
D L L C USE ONLY
PIV x -_ _ ___ _ FEE. _ _
APP LAC FEE AGT CHG MFG CLU• TOT<
SECTION 6. �AUESTIONS FOR ALL APPLICANTS
- 1. ' Do local zoning laws permit the sale of alcoholic beverages at the location you seek to license--74ES DNO
2. Distance to the nearest church r me(3dd Ess of church:
- . 3. Distance to the nearest school -- am//aIdrets of school•
4 Are you the DOWNER ESSEE ❑SUBLESSEE ❑PURCHASER of the premises, //
5. If the premises is leased give name and address of lessor G.4,/L.4" K//7147,2/Z-`-'.4.....7
n _ Name
Address �C J e-
City 1 State Zip
6 What date was lease/sublease signed. 7 /�-- f. �. Teym o�s is ears
7 Does the lease include provision to retransfer the liquor license back to the lessor at termination ❑YES NO �
8. Hasa license or transfer al license for the premises represented herein been denied by'the State within the past sixty months'OYES LJ NO
If yes attach an explanation �j
,� - - _ 9. Who will manage this business.
,,L .1 Ai r c/' /A/tt�1
�- Last Name First Name Mid4^s.
Each manager,other than owner(s) must complete Form 134-ind submit an 'applicant fingerprint card
10. Does any alcoholic beverage manufacturer wholesaler or employee thereof have any interest in your ess OYES NO /
_ - 11 Is the premises licensed with a license other than the one for which you are applying.DYES NO If so give license No: ./ 1 1/ / / / ,
licensee(exactly as it appears on License)
Last Name First Name Middle
2 hat Is your Arizona State Sales Tax(Privilege)License No // ' ('•1 76 e•2 �,,
13 Do you understand that a portion of the fees such as Application Fee($50.00)and Interim Permit Fee lif applicable)is not refundableK7TE5 ONO
SECTION 6. FOR SERIES 15 OR 16 APPLICANTS
_ - - 1 Is there a valid Series 15 or 16 license currently issued at the proposed location OYES ❑NO If so enter licensee's name exactly as it appears on been
_ __ ' _ License No. / / / / / /
Last Name First Name Middle
- NOTE..frtthe answer to question 1 above is 'yes•• you may qualify for an Interim Permit to operate while your application is pending,
r.lprtsull Syctigcs 4-203:01, 4,R S., complete 4 Form 176 attach appropriate fee, attach the current license and submit with this
IaPPUSatiop. .. ,'
-
- 2. What percentage t your gross sales represents the purchase of"meals" %
3 How rnuch of your floor space is designed for restaurant dining(so ft) ,Seating capacity for dining purposes
4 Have you attached a copy of your menu that includes prices DYES ONO If not explain(
SECTION 7. INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP OWNERS-
I Answer the following questions-(If applicants are married answer each question for both husband and wife)
Percentage Owned
Last Name First Name Middle by each personrs�r Residence Address City,State Z
C�vnJ.t� 4 7R/6/A 6//EA/ /OO !o /0 et c570 _f 40A//.1/6I6C/ I0,4Cyf c%7
ADplice t(enter here and t ectiuo 31 cfS•
w.t%1/ 7-/G/A e7/F A/
Partner for Spouse)
Partner
~ - - Partner
Attach additional sheet if necessary
3 - EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND AN 'APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD ^^
_ - 2 Is each person listed above a bona fide resident of Arizona.R'ES DNO
3 Is any person other than the above going to share in the profits/losses of the business OYES DO
b
�r>
SECTION 8. CORPORATION OR CLUB APPLICANTS- t"
1 Name of corporation or club f'
a-f T37 (Enter exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc or Club Charter)
-sp f r?r r
2. Date incorporated or chartered- State where incorporated t ~s s��
v 3 Arizona Corporation Commission File No Date authorized to do business in Arizona %P
-'et �-." S<v.--2- :•Ji "rs.-* 4, Is corporation or club nonprofit.OYES ONO If so give I R S tax exempt No r� "t
5. If a club refer to Section 4-101 4 A.R.S. and enter the subparagraph under which you are applying _7Ge
6. List officers and directors y
Last Name First Name Middle Title Residence Address City State,Z
•
Attach additional sheet if necessary
7 List stockholders owning 10%or more
EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND SUBMIT AN"APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD
Last Name First Name Middle Percentage owned Residence Address City/State/2,
If this corn is owned by another corp. attach an ownership Officer/director disclosure for the parent corporation Attach additional sheets as necessary
OW PIN
•
r 'SECTION 9. PERSON 10 PERSON TRAN' ER" 1UES"�
TIONNS TO BE COMPLETED BY CURRENTLICENSEE
�.1 . }` s
1 CuCur t liceee• �/P 1-/4'/v d b" .- z'!KA e Entity
xactly as it appears on license/1 Last Name First Na a Middle Eta( Agt etc
2 Corporate name /fill Ie ci % f (.i7-c c-
If current license is in the name of a corporation enter exactly as It appears un license
` �7 r �/ )
3, Currant business name /i,A Vac V� k' (4 c L
,4 actly as it appears on,11: tss
s 4 Current business address. •r S s 7.� Sex..-f Eh/&L41�1 County. '�•i„•
- Exactly as it appears pn license N r Z�L(�
City /"/°4?---c a'.c ` c -i • ZIP CODE: 'f
71
5. License Series. 7 License Number to/7/R/I/e/l/S`.7 Date of last renewal. /..... 8.3
6. Have you complied with the Uniform Commercial Code concerning bulk sale transfers ES
ES ONO If not attach an explanation
7 Have all creditors lien holders interest holders etc been notified of this transfer fk ES ONO
�. - 8. Does the applicant intend to operate the business while this application is pending'(�'(ES ONO If so complete Form 176.attach appropriate fee aft
_a r•gr"•-A_cv ttre°.Ti's- __ "-a current license and submit with this application(for Series 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 or 13 only)
e _ �`! 9. To be completed by the CURRENT LICENSEE
I HEREBY RELINQUISH MY RIGHTS TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LICENSE TO THE APPLICANT NAMED HEREIN AND HEREBY DEPO
AND SAY THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS SECTION ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE
/J 7 2712..—-8 4, . ,1-c Q � 7-.
3-.2es
STATE OF .4Z Signature of curr, t licensee Date signed
COUNTY OF ,/f/�L -
• - _ - SUBSCRIBED AOID SWORN TO before mu this day of ,19
C'6-��sf—!v' C�L ���
I Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC
- My Commission expires on.•l s i.. - .
- -_ - SECTION 10 LOCATION TO LOCATION TRANSFER QUESTIONS (Does not apply to Series 15,16 or 17G)
- . - APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT IS FINALLY APPROVED BY THE STATE
- - - 1 Current business address. County.
Exactly as it appears on license
City ZIP cepa
1/_ _ h 2 Current business name.
E• xactly as it appears on license t�
3 New business address County
Also enter in Section 3 Do not use P O Box Number
City ZIP Code
�; 7. * 4 New business name' 1�
'r`= " PF _ _ Also enter in Section 3 V. a
5. License Series. License Number / / / / / / / Date of last renewal'
-- _ 6 What date do you plan to move. . Date of planned opening. CP
FEE=S100 (Refer to Section 4-209.H,ARS,
SECTION 11 APPOINTMENT OF NEW AGENT FOR CORPORATION OR CLUB LICENSE: for multiple agent change lees)
_ 1 Current Agent's name.
_ - - - Exactly as it appears on license Last Name First Name Middle
.. 2 New Agent s name
Also enter in Section 3 Last Name First Name Middle
- - 3 License Series License mull Wet i / / / / / / Date of last renewal'
4 Does this transaction involve the sale of any portion of the corporate stock DYES ONO If so Complete Section 8
5. To be completed by a CORPORATE OFFICER
I ,HEREBY CONSENT TO THE AGENT APPOINTMI
Printed Name of(Amputate Officer
~x - NAMED HEREIN AND AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY ASSIGN A NEW AGENT IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH RESIGNATION
-- _ DISCHARGE OF THIS AGENT I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE BACKGROUND REPORT SHOWS THAT I, THE CORPORATION
- ANY OFFICER DIRECTOR OR STOCKHOLDER HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, OR A LIQI
VIOLATION IN THE PAST YEAR I WILL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER THE LICENSE TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQI
LICENSES AND CONTROL AND HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO APPEAL SUCH ACTION
R
x�.. * _ tjr_
STATE OF Signature of corporate/club officer
COUNTY OF
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of ,19_
Q ar --
_- - - My Commission expires on. Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC
III SECTION 12 PROBATE OR WILL ASSIGNMENT OF AN EXISTING LICENSE(Does not apply to corporationsl'
1 Current licensee's name.
(Exactly as it appears on license.) List Name First Name Middle
- 2 Assignee's name-
- (Also enter in Section 31 Last Name First Name Middle
3 License Series _ _ License number
unn I l_.l_ _L____Z / Date of last renewal.
4 Attach a combed copy of the will in la°bate ilisti drun°n ursuutttenl that specifically distributes the liquor license to the assignee
i
SECTION 13 GOVERNMENT LICENSE Ifor cities towns.or counties only)
•
_ _ 1 Person to administer this license
• (Also enter in Section 3) Last Name First Name Middle
2. Applicant. Attach respective governing body s authorization
Name of City Town or County
3 Have you answered ALL questions in Section 3 including the location to be licensed DYES ONO
4 Do you understand that you can only serve alcoholic beverages for consumption on the licensed premises DYES DNO
5. Will a concessionaire be using this license DYES ONO If so attach the agreement and appropriate authorizations required by Section 4 205.03 P
6 Do you understand a separate license must be obtained for each premises from which alcoholic beverages are to he served 0 YES 0 NO
w' \ ,111,
. t _ 4
1/SECTION 14 DIAGRAM OF PREMISES(Diagram must M on this form,blueprints not accepted)
- > 1 SHOW ONLY THE AREA TO BE COVERED BY THIS LICENSE INCLUDVSALL ENTRANCES/EXITS DRIVE IN WINDOWS,SERVICE WINDOW
LIQUOR STORAGE AREAS,AND DIMENSIONS OR SQUAREUs� FOOTAGE-FIGURES w,, DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS LIVING QUARTERS,ET(
SERIES 15 AND SERIES 16 APPLICANTS MUST EXPLIQTLY DEPICT KIT EP �s,,UIPMENT AND DINING FACILITIES
M
{ I^ t {-({ '. P ( •nI I-) ( _-�)
1 — _ 1 r•- ( ) L( J
eS
�. . •P
1..... -— V I I --I ' ('-'-- .' \';
•
i '- JJ
.__.. ....,....7: „.„...,„..._.......,.......„7:::'_-_.'-:;-:•;''::. . •'' •
"" 1 ;
i 611
j f. +-0 --- ---IL'.• ul / (
r ‘,IN 417.',.II • ,,..______ ) .--- N ‘,,, 1
- Imo_. ,\1 . O s \y o
\ • L.4.,- )). !
f.,z;-ti) -4•1!....:4 \ t"•-.• 1.',1,
2. Do you agree to notify the Department of any changes of boundaries entrances exits,or service windows prior to modification OYES ONO
3. The above diagram is the only area where alcoholic beverages are to be sold served,consumed,dispensed possessed or stored
Signature of applicant/agent
SECTION 1 . SIGNATURE BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS
ST E OF ARIZONA s I
1 ss
COUNTY OF 17 al./ -c,-s11-1,,l
I. ,BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OA
Printed Name of Applicant for Agent if Corp or Club)
- HEREBY DEPOSE, SWEAR, AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT (1) I AM THE APPLICANT (OR AGENT
APPLICANT IS A CORPORATION/CLUB) MAKING THE FOREGOING APPLICATION (21 THAT SAID APPLICATION HAS BEEN READ At
THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE CORRECT, AND COMPLETE, (3)TH
THIS APPLICATION IS NOT BEING MADE TO DEFRAUD OR INJURE ANY CREDITOR, TAXING AUTHORITY REGULATOf
AUTHORITY OR TRANSFEROR 14) THAT NO 0111ER PERSON, FIRM OH CORPORA rION EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREIN,HAS,
-------
OWNERS,INTEREST IN THE SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WHICH ESE STATEMENTS ARE MADE 151 AND THAT NONE OF 11
PARTNERS, OFFICERS DIRECTORS OR STOCKH DER LISTED HEREIN HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN TI
PAST FIVE YEARS OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION IN THE I-� Y�4faN.►s/`— -
•
Signature
SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me r- 7 0( �-
1'2
Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC //�_ i" - _ My Commission expires on .r
r
... MK
•
►ones taow —D L L C USE ONLY—
- STATE OF ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL _t'1
1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 AL
PHOENIX,AZ 85007 �l 3 1\,1 UA
602/255 5141 Sa.6 u
QUESTIONNAIRE L
-. .- TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER PARTNER STOCKHOLDER (10% OR
p `--./� MORE) AND MANAGER ALSO EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD WHICH MAY BE
OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
- READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT
/
1 Name
GeJA/A/ 77/TR/C/A E/i/cr4 Date of birth 04- e 9- 4/
Last t First �/� may/ ()Middle�1.I �nMMonth day year yy}
_ _ _ _ •- 2 Business Name_ Al 51 Lit/IV � /�GJlt.2ryN� Place of birth. <5 f/NAW "eh,
p p / (As it appears in Section J of Form 1201 / 0ftty / State
3 Business address ;00S' (JE57 �Lidee257/T/on i/Vc /49cNE vicz JAe. D'S.I�O
t Do:njot use P/0 Bo.numb/rrl Q City County Zip Code
4 Drivers license No• Al5 04 4 14- �7i Height 5/ (,J/' Weight. S0 Eye color. a R Hair color giQ.
4,-. e State / /G'
5 Name of spouse %J/�//AM Le W/S 4 /Y/� Date of birth: D/ .: 60-4Z.
First s�/t�MJiddle �f Last Maiden ,f
"' `a f.e_..r `1 "�-- 6 Of what state are you a bona fide resident jli /zUAJ Tt If Arizona date of residency. Gil f^�
_ 7 Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state.
Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business
Employed or Business ',lure Street Addresss City State,and Zip Code)
A DATES GCVA e2 1 4£ST Pthive _
_ Present Position or business engaged Vi4-f 2 deiG- p A D`r G
in PRE-SE C A)T Al fr/t,
2 so -zeemv eet•L " A,444/1e-✓eT
B DATES LA RONdA /7PTS, LA /a)A)C4A !i///A$e Apts.
Position held or business engaged in q//o/13 .Jss/T• rn�.2• G 7767 N 7'1f sT.
immediately preceding above(Al /'�-/— P3 Ow(n.)(, A z z &•So/4_
`~ c D T�$ PANovEle )3ho.VA6En ,IT
Position held or business engaged in -/� X Z ���• T2/.. P/1f, %lax as ro 70
c4 0 f A 073 r Phorn/A' 4 z.gre4
immediately preceding above CBI 7'G-fa / /
Attach additional sheet if necessarya-" - 8 Indicate where you have resided for the last five years
FROM TO RESIDENCE
Month Year Month Year Street City State Zip Code
s. a - �a d'9 — ,�,QFSFuT loa 7aDNovoDA� t�o{�cyE dc r , /t z a2oZU
9-4- f3 /7-/- 13 �7rv7 �/, l 7' s' 'WI.. , . At Ise/¢-
7-2f -8'3 _ -6- 83 a2os/ At m/sot/ / - A0E-4/Y �z free./z.
1r-/1- d2. /a-.27-Fz 02/OD o lipSHE%/e7 d� dlsaao
Attach additional sheet if necessary t n
/JjA 9 How many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto' 9/[o AI) 7 5 // s.
10 Give Telephone Numbers for 9Ora D 7— /a 6. 3 'S 7
Business Residence
11 Have you ever been detained cited arrested,indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including r,�
traffic violations end liquor violations ili,a Cs ❑NO
12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been fined,imprisoned had sentence suspended,or placed on probation for , ,.,�/
violation of any law or ordinance OYES I .v6
s
13 Have you ever had a business professional or liquor license rejected denied revoked suspended,or fined in this or any other state' OYES 4aw•s!z
a iit/
14 Ha you ever hadan application for any business,profession ,or liquor license rejected or denied' OYES
VFW
wN
15. Has anyone ever flied suit or obtained a Judgment against you in any civil action, the subject of which involved Irau0 a N�� r,
( �r
misrepresentation of a liquor related matter: ❑YEs
3p 3
/►
18. If any answer to QuestIons 9 through 15 is YES' attach a signed statement giving complete details ��/�
17 Are you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations L0T'ES ❑'
18 Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales(Privilege/Tax Account and your pity permit fees(if applicablel current [RYE'S
or
19 Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of arty proposed charge oflatsai� s�r n ele prior to making any such changes. [RYES Dr
20 Do you agree to post the permit or license it issued in a'b'nspicrous place on the premises and within view of the general public L7 s'ES ❑r
21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine and beer supplies only from licensed Arizona wholesalers R'SES ❑r
22 Do you agree to keep all records invoices and other documents relating to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a
s - Period of two years and to have them easily accessible for examination. 21YES Cr
23. Do you consent for the duration of the permit or license if issued to the entrance inspection and search by any law enforcement
official without a warrant or other process,of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of �,/
the State Liquor Laws Regulations and Board Directives ;4yES Or
24 Do you consent to an investigation of your background including all records of every kind and description including police records
_ and to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and //
any other individual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control ICY ES D.
25 If arty answer to Questions 17 through 24 is 'NO' attach a signed statement giving the reasons for such answers.
- FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT.
STATE OF((CJ'�%Z�S'z-t-t'—
Ly�J 1 ss
COUNTY OF^�) Cis
tC t A G
G O Al A/ BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HEREf
Printed name of apple-ant
DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAKING THE FOREGOING QUESTIONNAII
- - - AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THERE
ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE
- .. SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO beloie me this e9 day of 19
5)'4
My Comm(ssion Expir+Qnplurelglr NQIEt RY PUBLIC
- _ My Commission expires on 1�II 11l 1`J2�b
..it +'SLis:�E1 'r`vm-tea +++�R?ea'Ft'�,r
Irr ..
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
0 I
c)i\t • til
r K
ITEM # 1 MEETING OF 0
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
YES NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR V
COUNCILMAN HILL
COUNCILMAN SHANKS
VICE MAYOR EIDSON //
COUNCILMAN DAMIANO
COUNCILMAN STEELSMITb
__MAYOR_CLARKF
UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
f•
/
_
. . - - - _ _ ;�• 1 $* t:= ..+. x^"lWrok++"y•`t .rk' ti..,q _.z a'rrt xc.a.o.,
Aomak
•
•
ITEM NO. 7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE
APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE ,
SUBMITTED BY MS PATRICIA ELLEN GUNN , AGENT FOR WEST-WINDS RESTAURANT ,
BE AND HEREBY IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR
LICENSES AND CONTROL .
FOR APPROVAL
..?- W*.�L -' _.,,•-vi+� r "'ck�'-"i4. r `ts-»'*cam r' 4�'S'.` 7.at `;. -Ink
•
•
-^q> ..Fa «-• er-s ,; r`'` , ; , ,�? ta
ITEM NO . 7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE
APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE ,
SUBMITTED BY MS PATRICIA ELLEN GUNN , AGENT FOR WEST-WINDS RESTAURANT ,
BE AND HEREBY IS RECOMMENDED FOR DENIAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR
LICENSES AND CONTROL .
FOR DENIAL
p8ACW¢✓G U'
O 2
Z , /
gR�ZoNP ?it1 o� C�ac/ie 2unction
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
March 12, 1984 Approver for Agenda ,C- --'
Date Item/ #
First Reading ,q`
Second Reading /- _
MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL _Public Hearing
fl..lL Otd Business
)
THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ l `-% New Business
j ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR 7 Consent Agenda
PREPARED BY: - 1" JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: - REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM
PZ-32-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 219)
MARCH 20, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING
APRIL 3, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION
Project Description
Rezoning case number PZ-32-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 219, is a
request by the applicant Randall Industries to rezone their
property from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence
by Planned Development. The applicant is proposing an 81-lot
townhouse project. The site is a vacant 10-acre parcel located
at the northwest corner of Winchester Road and 16th Avenue in
Section 28. It is designated Low Density currently, and Medium
Density at the time of pre-preliminary filing, on the General
Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, mobile homes,
houses, and apartments.
Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments
Two protest petitions were filed with the City. The signatures are
those of Michael J. Schmidt whose property, within 150 feet,
represents 50 percent of the area on one side, and the Bullards,
Dunnagans, and the L'Odenses whose property represents 100 percent
along the front. These are, therefore, valid protest petitions.
In order to receive approval of this project, the City Council
must approve it by a three-fourths vote.
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219)
March 12, 1984
Page Two
The companion preliminary plat (SD-5-83) was approved by the Subdivision
Committee on January 19, 1984. If a decision is made to approve the
proposal , the Council must find that this Planned Development complies
with all six criteria set forth in Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. ,•-.
Final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order
for the City to obtain dedicated roadways.
The earlier drawings submitted by the applicant proposed a design that
did not meet the intent of the Planned Development Ordinance which is
to encourage creative design, diversify the relationship of various
uses, structures, and spaces to counteract the effects of monotony.
The site plan nave a strong linear and monotonous character to the
development. The perspective renderings did not show the diversification
of spatial relationships and the quality detail work found in the Sutton
Place project which was to be the model for this project. A new set
of revised architectural drawings showing a far better design was
presented at the Commission hearing. There will be a few minor changes
required to the preliminary Planned Development site plan if the City
Council approves the project. City Engineering and Fire Department
stipulations will be recommended before approval is given by the City
Council .
Of particular concern in this project and others is the proposal for a
perimeter wall . Such walls are often five to six feet high running
parallel to the street and intended to give the future occupants a measure
of privacy and sound attenuation. Unless the linear pattern of such
walls is broken up by recessing some sections of the wall and alternating
the heights, a monotonous character and "tunnel " effect to the City' s
overall urban landscape is gradually created. Therefore, it is the
planning staff' s recommendation to also include a stipulation that the
perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals, that the wall heights
vary from 3.5 feet to 6 feet, and that landscaping along the street
frontages consist of naturalizing or native vegetation such as Palo
Verde trees, Ocotillos, palm trees, barrel and Saguaro cacti .
The current General Plan designation is Low Density. The designation
was Medium Density at the time the applicant submitted pre-preliminary
Planned Development plans and the proposal conforms to the Medium
Density designation.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of
February 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following
motion: (M/S Polomskey/Vehon 4-3-0)
'Rik ,^
ORDINANCE NO. 219
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
- PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO
CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
.6=eF u BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
.mmk ter= JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT
SECTION I IN GENERAL
1 The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona,
Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as
The Southeast ; of the Southwest ; of the Northwest * of
Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County,
Arizona,
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned
Development
2. The approval of the zoning district classification incorporates, by
reference, the preliminary approval of the Planned Development,
including all materials and documents as submitted by the applicant,
and the development of said property shall be in accordance with
said Planned Development application conditions, provisions, and
- =-- _*= stipulations, and as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance.
The application includes the "Street Light Agreement," and if
executed as part of this application, the "Agreement for Maintenance
of Landscaping Within City Rights-of-Way."
3. Applicant shall install, at his own expense, fire hydrants as per
approved plans of the Apache Junction Fire District for this
Planned Development
4 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, off-site street
- improvements as set forth on the Planned Development plans in
compliance with design details approved by the Director of Public
Works
lt
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
✓� ! All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
rit C A"a' :.' , Li of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
irtf}r �i are hereby repealed.
f � { SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
t _
• .�, .. a*ram _. ; If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF _ , 19
Wendell J Clarke
Mayor
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request for Agenda Item
PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219)
March 12, 1984
Page Three
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case
No. PZ-32-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 219,
application of Randall Industries for their property described A01.4,
as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1
Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned
Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache
Junction City Council the approval of said application.
"Any stipulations or recommendations are:
1 . The applicant comply with all requirements • " the City
Engineer and Fire Department.
2. Standards and specifications shall cor•ly with the City
Development Guide.
3. The applicant comply with the re•uirements for final
Planned Development approval • for to the issuance of
building permits.
"The reasons for the recomme •ation are.
1 . The request conforms o the General Plan.
2. The request confo s to Section 33.09 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
3. It is the hie est and best use of the land." �.
Recommended Motion
See attached.
JAN:mas
ORDINANCE NO 219
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO
CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT.
SECTION I IN GENERAL
1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning
Map for the parcel of land described as.
The Southeast 1 of the Southwest i of the Northwest ; of
Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal
County, Arizona,
be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification
from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned
Development
2. The approval of the zoning district classification incorporates, by
reference, the preliminary approval of the Planned Development,
including all materials and documents as submitted by the applicant,
and the development of said property shall be in accordance with
said Planned Development application conditions, provisions, and
, ' �" `� t stipulations, and as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance
The application includes the "Agreement for Maintenance of Landscaping
Within City Rights-of-Way," if executed as part of this application.
3 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, fire hydrants as per
( approved plans of the Apache Junction Fire District for this
i ( Planned Development
4 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, off-site street
;' f, improvements and street lights as set forth on the Planned
r f_l% Development plans in compliance with design details approved by
g the Director of Public Works.
I ' �
L, SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
Amok
6/ All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference,
are hereby repealed
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this
ii/., Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for
any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
/{)71)
i
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE
4' JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 .
1! ,
iii/4
Wendell J Clarke
Mayor
ATTEST.
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO 219
PAGE TWO
4 APPROVED AS TO FORM.
D v lexand
City ttorney
Aloft, ollik
ORDINANCE
TWOOF NO TWO219
ATTEST.
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
-- APPROVED AS TO FORM
- 1
David . A exander
City A torney
_ [
1
RECOMMENDED MOTION
ORDINANCE NO. 219
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-32-83 , application of
Randall Industries
ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 219
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHF 1UNCTTON
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION. ARIZONA 70NING
ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO
_ CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL.
1 The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer
and Fire Department
2. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development
Guide
3 The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned
1 ' Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits
4. That the perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals. and
- that wall heights vary from 3.5 feet to 6 feet.
5. Landscaping along the street frontages consist of natural v ing
or native vegetation such as Palo Verde trees, Orntillos, palm "oft,
trees. Barrel and Saguaro cacti.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE•
OPTIONAL CHOICES
t v te
a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning
Commission which are hereby adopted by reference."
b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's
reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read
those specific reasons.)
c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons
in addition to the above If this is the case, you will
have to read them and you are requested to write them
out for the City Clerk.)
CAPPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR
CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA
ro 3
Cash Receipt No '�6 6Z AcmultZso' Date\1-ZZ Case Number ?� 3 2 8
TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL
I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning
regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as Follows (list the present zon-
ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel
numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed)
- Parcel 1 Frpm _GR - I To CR-5 /17
Parcel 2
Parcel 3
Parcel 4
Parcel S
The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application
is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet).
SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 28.
T.1N. , R.8E. , PINAL COUNTY, Az
The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property
is as follows (give direction & distance rt an nearest mapped street)
10.0074, ACRES ± NORTHWEST OF 16TH AVENUE & WINCHLSTER
(Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate
signed statement if additional space is needed )
1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under
present zoning districting? DOES NOT REFLECT HIGHEST AND RFST USE
2 Are there any {mown changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical
conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining
property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer
- AREA DEVELOPING INTO A RESIDENTIAL/URBAN COMPLEX
3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon-
ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the camnmity
or neighborhood, as the case may be?
Explain
N/A
4. Other reasons for the subject request
Page 1 of 2 pages
4r-
Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and
structures
EXISTING - VACANT LAND
—� PROPOSED - 81 TOWNHOMES WITH RECREATIONAL COMMON AREA
Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application &
submit same in person to• Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache
- Junction, Arizona (Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli-
cant must suit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this
change of zoning).
4/1/cc �hu40wil,r/ e. PO/fax Z4t1l /Eai'!,//i.(42BL �Coz) Sip-0/73
Name of appl cant or representative) Address) (Phone)
(Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone)
(Name 4,/
& Address of person to when petition & notices should be mailed)
„l✓ 21 /lam
:turd of applicant) `(Date
*Note- Plans are required when application is filed for following Special Use
Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus-
trial CI-2, Article 18; Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c
•
- DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING
(for office records only) �\
LEGAL PUBLICATICN
Date filed Applicant Zoning Case
Cen';u. Dtvi',ion & Tract No. Appl icat ion received by
Remarks
* fir�•.�s.„- �.,e�:.,� -�. t�:�•
REC
NOV 2 2 1983
i pEPT. C� PLANNING
��"4s•K'�fi'z t h GS. i.. /.!F•'.�-+tKy F
+. SL
J ..L
Page 2 of 2 pages
{
PZ-32-83
(PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 219)
PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO
CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
j LIMITS OF ZONING DISTRICT (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL)
11,® 12
- - CR-1 u E. FRED AVE.
1E ® Hss.
14 ies® 33
CR-5/P")
= ` Q E. FRIAR AVE,
SUBJECT SITE c2, 0oes
1 \\1!!!)
Ltj
® (CR-1 to CR-5/PD) _z I
21
y► j 810
IC ID
EAST 16TH AVENUE
E �i411p2E`lr,�,
2C 2D 2A 2B i 14 13 12
I LK-
i15 16 17
E, ACH I I\A AVE
QCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-04-
OCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-03-
N SCALE. 1"=200'
n COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-26-
(:;) COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-05-
....
, .
, .
, .
•,. . .
,. .•••
.. , , . . . . , , •,.
. ... . . . . . .. . . - ,
, ..... ., , , , , . L., • - ,.
- •
li•I. • ,..'.,:,' . .
. :.
..A, • .„...-,
•;, , -,...4i.':4 .:1-:" : • . . '..- . '., ' ''.'4' ' • ' ' ,
,.
.*. . ''•., ',..-f`,14 l'-', , . ,•- '',..
....'•
L:-
--
.;•'• •• .T,0.4, ' , . „. .:, .. • -
\ ,....-',. .
1. : •
\ )
4 N.vil -1.•- di _ ‘k i) ''‘‘ 1 . ‘ V..1/..k, '‘
,--;,-ol . If_--, ni' 41.._, \ ,-% • ,f lt-- "' -..•-• 1 k..,, ,
c,..._ .t, ..:-..\,-. 1 - , I ii•.I C—,•-• 47 ja •-j..... z•c- ._ i j. ?"
'4., /,I`" ; te.-•"(1. .Nh , 744*N------`41C'''
•tVt,04 j , , ' A 11-1'1' - ,-'-- 1/);2,..'77.tlilY' 1 \ -4 /'
?.& • C:4 • -f'ffk 7- ‘,\,,,,...,. Viii, -//.0.4*/r7f,'
)f?• --,_, ,a,:- ...;„„ ,-..-,...,,, ,,,--;-...•., /, e- .4• __-
. \
y's fj Y *tig"ifi I/
"Nr 140.. „
.-t1... ;4:_..-
-........ . -
-2e..------.?„...!,
, /070 .iliei r_,_ ..........• _. .__- is\,_7; , ,........_ r\
'-.. . . ( • 0)0'1
••-,012, xsi, v‘,....)
'. ,/, > ..., •
.,'
Irt! ,--
...... irr.,,t .,„ • . . '11
II, . ,•,., , ., 41.....s_....14
.,-.. •- -•• 2?;- ‘;-" - .t.
•••• lej 0 a 0 t?f `•-- ,, ...t• ....1, -•‘.'
"".4. iiir` •.''%, •..''• ... •• e ...r,',, !. ili, ..,,,,pi .-. 1
. 0 I A -1 i \ t .,,,,
-••7—,...-,-. •,•', s ...ig
""..:. -: ..."-.7 •' "..'""*.; .
.
1- -• .;;III/1._.: ...., a 4s,"00 • 4,_,At_o: ,..;',,,.-7 "' 1 .; ..,‘,1t,'; ' ' 460-'' 4 ° ' •,;.`".' A' "", V
__
A • 1„ 041; s',-. - -.%... --, . . ...,'-''': .. •=4.°7-4. , ,p,; : ...,......f.:........ ..,,_ .14,- ••4 ,, ,,,.....%.,1114r7,..,
' 'AY1/:,:-:'1IIt'•'-' •' -'.• '.. .- -:.-.'. -1'• .'-'''',-,C.I... 4.,:i V,tr 9:Igl'e-t•-.41- --'.47•Z.'r...%44"4"•A;•(// .' '' ••••' 12'•'"4"4"4. 'k Tz, i\ •
1'ek. •-.,. . „ - .....- -.1r. - • i'" • •• . •'1- till `'=----' • III-1-" ""le'4",II '' f ' '; "rAIII /... - t'llitAC ;AP% ' l'V'' ''''''''NII,
!' i,. ''•: ••• ' -,..-.,...............11,-1--•";•:....„7.,Io'S..:e.„!.. 1-.`.: '•,-.•'. . •ti,k_t.........t.„,4,,
. ..:1.f.-.2\''': ( ,;`,7-- '.(—.. .,•,'' -',„-•,— - -• '- .. ....?-7..,, .
Faji'f•..• -..1.- -I 't ' --'s;%. 'P.:,...• ...... ...:'. .• •...•' ' •.. ! ,.,.,.. t ! •V /..:,' :<.4.'.4,4;‘• -';;.'y'rqiiii:.....-- - ‘-7.•' •••• - -...., e• _„ ...
-."•• 1- .•' ,..,, , ,.,.. : .... ..... .i...,,... - 5--1:-
, • , -, -A —'--- • •
,• •. •"0.6 . .
SO ' ..10•- .... ' • .. "." 1\ . -ga14. ., ../.• .. •..A te.• ., :.1:..
(• ..: d'.• ‘ ' •, '"4"•• • ', %I'FfPit . • 1. . .. -
••- Ma IV ..:l ..;•." • .. . /11 I•.; , •, '
... ,.•:‘'.• j'd..' IA' i. •,. ...'•T'' i .1 6..ftg. ' . ...A.' . , 4...\ /.. )
\ s. ' 11. ... i: • 1411111—...r. Fell111-
"3-
, .,:.:446406/4'' ''''' 4;.' 1
'' ''':-//1„,iii..,1„...z.,:',Iiiii;11...1.:t,l'ii................... ::. .:, ,. ..... .1, .
,
.
.c.,
. ':. ' ''''''''. ';:.lit —IT 7141:71:::.:: :°.-....t./.•'. ;C.- °Y41111
, ,„ • •• • ,,,,,, ...
,,,,,'• .1'?q,';.,',,Ii';',.;:'•,;,. ,, 4 ;.4,4) - . '''' ''
\\,/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIPEIIINIIIit '• ,- .. --k ...flr,t',....- Ia. . • ,
'' •=7 I / _.. . , .#4,,,,,StAk t.,'Ai.. •
--: '••i''fiIi114111 '' - •,,,,, ---... , — • ' --,
--4A.:'(;.4".Z,,,,,-7•;.,-.
r's0 'le,
t -.111 ,0 ......._,„,„. ..rip.,..,•i ••••••‘ t, k , „1„,
if! .„.40,,-a-IAa'1114-1.1,Piter . t., 1 Id • , • t • 4 t ' ' tit 1-
t sz 1(:•.'11\I' "i ." \ ' \':iftalit4a7-1. -\ I, , t __
i* \k' \ 1 0/0 44).4- 4114,,;;;;;11F• _.....
)4i, • . '.. ...,:-..-..._ , is-,---,i•N k 1'!...
- .-L.,,,...-:, , A:.‘...4 ... il•tlk "NO
li ••• ''' ,17.1 '• '
... . -..-xt
Streetscape
• r.".01. ,' ' ; /i' I\ - Quail R
„ un Townhomes PZ-32-83
. .. ..
• if. , .
r, • 4111-4IN'
' 19 i)trUL.
- -' WI
.. -•
PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PZ-32-83
Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest
petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen
originated petition.
We, the undersigned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby
PROTEST the proposed rezoning of properties described as:
The southeast ; of the southwest of the northwest
3� of section 28, Township 1 north, range 8 east, Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal Co.mty,
Arizona.
REASONS TC PRCTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1 . Proposed planning and zoning change PZ-32-83 should not have
been granted a public hearing because:
a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained
for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
b. You are bypassing the citizens rights by disregarding the
petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification
of property.
2. We don't want the higher density which will be a 400% increase
81 units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1.
3 . Increased traffic.
4. Additional noise.
5. This 10 acres which is a part of 80 acres bounded by Broadway
on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho
•-• the west has been CR-i since 1974. People have bought land and
built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential
zoning.
6 . We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to desgroyi t e =
established economic or social uses of adjacent or surrounding
properties.
VE3 „ 1984
7.Is a neiclhhorhood area and should not be split up.
Ak
8. Is the only CR-1 south of US 60 privately owned in the;�city.rLa •NNING
There is a need for such a parcel. i�
/00%
9. We represent . b of the property owners bounding on one side
of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 300 ' .
AIME DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY4 cGL DATE
OR ADD ES
He 7 7 5/ -e- (F-g - /7 <IP
•
1,2,7z � �..-. ..� e?7,5" /S �.� .z 7 /77
7Th ' Z3/ /5 . / r4 e Any` �T -9/e0 ‘?7 /
`
/i24 1 a2g„ ez,/.4 GSO- 0,2 9 _ ld r�i' yam_ /p ac4e
PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHbNUE FZ-32-83
Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest
petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen
originated petition.
We, the underpinned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby
PROTEST the proposed rezoninc of properties described as:
The southeast ; of the southwest of the northwest
k of section 2F, Township 1 north, range 8 east, Gila and Salt .•�.
River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Final County,
Arizona.
REASONS TC PROTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1 . Proposed planning and zoninc change PZ-32-83 should not have
been granted a public hearinc because:
a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained
for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the
Zoninc Ordinance.
b. You are bypassing the citizens rights by disregarding the
petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification
of property.
2. We don't want the higher density which will be a 400% increase
8l units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1.
3. Increased traffic.
4. Additional noise.
5. This 10 acres which is a part of PO acres bounded by Broadway
on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho
the west has been CR-1 since 1974. People have bought land and
built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential
zoning.
6. We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to destroy the
established economic or social uses of adjacent or surroundipg, ' ,�.`
properties. ram - 4
7.Is a neighborhood area and should not be split up.
8. Is the only CR-1 south of US 60 privately owned in the city.
There is a need for such a parcel.
J i `"t'tiG
9. We represent 66% of the property owners bounding on one side
of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 150' .
E.ME _ DESCRIFTION OF PROPERTY DATE
� OR ADDRESS
/j
ilt � � `/ ci ,�� C SFr o-7- 6- Ji �� / - {�;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
COMMENCING at the West quarter corner of Section 28, Township 1 North,
Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County,
.•. Arizona; thence East (assumed bearing) along the southerly line of the
South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the North-
west quarter of the said Section 28, a distance of 660.64 feet to a point,
said point being the Southeast corner of the South half of the Southwest
quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the said
Section 28; thence North 00 04 ' 45" East along the easterly line of the
said South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the
Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of 40.00 feet to the True Point
of Beginning; thence West along a line being parallel with and 40.00 feet
northerly of the said southerly line of the South half of the Southwest
quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a
distance of 181.84 feet; thence North 00 05' 23" East, a distance of 48.82
feet to a point marking the beginning of a curve to the Right and having a
radius of 50.00 feet; thence along the arc of the said curve through a
central angle of 410 24 ' 35", a distance of 36.14 feet to a point marking
the beginning of a reverse curve to the Left having a radius of 50.00 feet;
thence along the arc of the said curve through the arc of the said curve
through a central angle of 1670 23' 52", a distance of 146.09 feet; thence
North 350 53' 55" West 165.77 feet to a point on the northerly line of the
South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the North-
west quarter of the said Section 28; thence North 89 59' 45" East along
the northerly line of the said South half of the Southwest quarter of the
Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 28, a distance of
333.58 feet to the Northeast corner of the said South half of the South-
west quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section
28; thence South 00 04' 45" West 289.81 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
✓ II
PROTEST PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PZ-32-83
Inasmuch as the city of Apache Junction does't provide protest
petitions for its citizens to use, please accept this citizen
originated petition.
We, the undersigned residents of Apache Junction, do hereby
PROTEST the proposed rezoning of properties described as:
The southeast 44 of the southwest < of the northwest
of section 2F, Township 1 north, range F? east, Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County,
Arizona.
REASONS TO PRCTEST THIS PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1 . Proposed planning and zoning change PZ-32-83 should not have
been oranted a public hearinc because:
a. Only two signatures of the six affected owners were obtained
for 33-1/3% where 51% is required by Section 2803 of the
Zoninc Ordinance.
b. You are bypassing the citizens rights by disregarding the
petition and consent method for bringing up reclassification
of property.
2. We don't want the hither density which will be a 400% increase
81 units on 10 acres opposed to 20 units if left CR-1.
3 . Increased traffic.
4. Additional noise.
5. This 10 acres which is a part of 80 acres bounded by Broadway
on the north, Winchester on the east 16th on the south, and Idaho
the west has been CR-1 since 1974. People have bought land and
built homes because they felt protected by the highest residential
zoning.
6. We feel if the rezoning is granted it will tend to destroy the
established economic or social uses of adjacent or surrounding
properties.
7.Is a neighborhood area and should not be split up.
8. Is the only CR-1 south of US 60 privately owned in the city.
There is a need for such a parcel.
9. We represent 66% of the property owners bounding on one side
of the parcel that is proposed for rezoning within 150' .
ARNE DESCRIITION OF PROPERTY DATE
/f OR ADDRESS
/
n 4e'l•C' //rZ�2 J. � C!/ (-4 c Ve , 6r s� ✓� / /! 6 i/
Oaklibk
FRANK HAZE BURCH
DANIEL CRACCHIOLO
C MICHAEL PIERCE
JAMES B CROOK JR
STEPHEN E SILVER
BRIAN KAVEN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW ARDA S RUTHERFORD
JACK DANIEL KLAUSNER
8 CRACCHIOLO, P A LUPE INIGUEZ-ES PI PINOZANOZA
BRAD S OSTROFF
DAVID G DERICKSON
PHOENIX OFFICE 2333 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE PHOENIX ARIZONA 85004 (602)252 7701 IAN NEALE
PHOENIX MAILING POST OFFICE BOX 13528 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85002 JOHN C B NITSCHE
DARYL MAN HART
MARTIN T JONES
Aril 17 1984 J LAWRENCE DUNLAVEY
p f DAVID CRAIG WILSON
EDWIN C BULL
HAND DELIVERED BRYAN F MURPHY
LINDAA FINNEGAN
AM./. RICHARD A WHITE
CATHERINE CONNER
ANDREW ABRAHAM
Honorable Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor of Apache Junction
Apache Junction City Council
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction, Arizona 85220
Re : Quail Run Townhomes , PZ-32-83
Dear Mayor Clarke and Council Members .
My client' s proposal to develop a quality townhouse
development in Apache Junction is the first proposal of its
kind in the area. As with all first proposals , there is a
certain amount of confusion and uncertainty regarding exactly
what the proposed project is and how it will be developed on
the part of the City and probably and equal amount of confusion
on the part of the development as to exactly what the City' s
requirements are.
I realize that it is the intent of the Apache Junction
City Council to make sure the first development of this type is
an example of the type of development that the City wants to see
and will set a standard for quality which will be required of
other developers in the future. My client feels as strongly
about that as the Council does. Certainly, he wants to make sure
he develops a high quality project that the City can be proud of.
I am aware that the Council has already continued this
matter once because of a conflict which I had. I thank you for
your consideration in doing so. Because of the nature of the
case and the necessity that this project be fully understood by
all parties before the Council renders its final decision, I
hereby request that the vote on this case be continued once
more. This request is so that I can meet with the staff and re-
solve any questions which people may have regarding what the pro-
posal for the project is and, further, so that I can finalize
with the staff exactly what the City' s requirements are and
whether any final changes need to be made in the site plan for
the project. I realize that normally the Council wishes to
bring matters to a final resolution as quickly as possible;
BURCH 8 CRACCHIOLO, P A
Honorable Wendell J. Clarke
Apache Junction City Council
April 17 , 1984
Page 2
however, I believe it is in the best interests of everyone to
see that an issue is fully understood by all parties before a
final vote is taken. I believe that one more continuance will
accomplish that purpose.
As always , your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours ,
Martin T. Jones
MTJ/vlk
xc: Mr. Michael McNulty
Dictated But Not Read
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES if Kik
4),( 1)/(:)tifr
,..,,
ITEM # D MEETING OF 411t--
4,,,,,e ,PLOT I ON BY; SECONDED BY; h 10 ''✓V'
YES NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR /
COUNC I LMAN HILL //
COUNCILMAN SHANKS
VICE_MAYOR EIDSON i
COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V /
I-COUNCIL
MAN STEELSf�ITb � _
__MAYOR_CLARKF
UN,I!IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
I°)(
•
ITEM # ,tjMEETING QL1/011
MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: I I tvon-‘
YES NO ABSTAINED
COIJNCII MAN D4MIANO
Co � U
UNCILMa.l HILL
COLINC LEAN LEP& TAYLOR
._.C011NC II MAN .SHANKS
_VIc.F MAYOR EIDSON V
._COUNCILMAN STEELSMITII V
MAYOR CLARKE V
UNAN I"^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
9' re4_
ITEM # Q
U MEETING OF 31/Ar/
POTION BY: SECONDED BY : -)( Vi/k)// '
YES NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH
COUNCILMAN SHANKS
COUNCILMAN HILL r ✓
COUNC I Lr^AN TAYLOR
COUNCILMAN DAMIANO
'17
VICE MAYOR EIDSON
MAYOR CLARKE
UNANIr1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL �,,
April 21, 1984
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. 85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position in regards to PZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material.
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine,
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as.
1. Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units.
2. increased traffic.
3. Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5. Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential.
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33.09 No.
1. of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
•
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6. We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12,000sq' .
8. Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zoning.
Name Descr'ption of prop ty o address Date
,_ qr /15- e o 49(.1 • ��i zf -e/
_ c
71� . -h ___ L l 3 S-1 i_, lac &-. 66 lf..c.: 4 3, / ?f V
9
Z 9 _. ,=.�' ��.. �6 mac . -y /7
. 4/474-- /7 '
15 1
G
Hi
20 •
A 1
April 21, 1984
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. 85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position in regards to PZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material .
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine.
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as.
1 . Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units.
2. increased traffic.
3 . Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5 . Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential .
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33 .09 No.
1 . of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6. We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12,000sq' .
8 . Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zoning.
Name Description of property or address Date
2 ,
s .
7 .
it .
___.. __._..-_....._ _.._..___..
U .
17
[
April 21, 1984
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. 85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position in regards to PZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall. Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material .
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine.
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as.
1 . Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units.
' 2. increased traffic.
3 . Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5 . Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential .
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33 .09 No.
1 . of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6. We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12,000sq' .
P . Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zoning.
Name Description of property or address Date
I., j y' 77 — ,., itii/%7 I.
s- 2- /4 `6 'T,/ -=c,., ‘J f 17
/,, ! / r y
it&3._.-..S,_ cl -- V--24 —81
S , E _30.s_._ /a ' -----— V-- f- g y --
j4 '
l 1 . ._....___-_-___ -__... _. . ..._ .. _..__ ._ ..._.. ..____ .__.-_.__..
_..._
2 --
0 __ ... --- --
_ . -
(
1. ` .
April 21, 1984
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. 85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position in regards to lZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material .
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine.
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as.
1 . Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units.
2 . increased traffic.
3 . Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5. Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential .
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33 .09 No.
1 . of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6. We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12, 000sq' .
8 . Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zoning.
Mame Descr tion of propertyor address Date
r ;
0273 /"ie• -' L am' ,/
r
4- • /
s .
7
I4r
l �
17
1 3 •
{n (
April 21, 1934
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. 85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position in regards to PZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material.
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine.
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as.
1 . Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units.
2. increased traffic.
3 . Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5. Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential.
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33 .09 No.
1. of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed,
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6. We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12,000sq' .
8 . Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zoning.
.Tame Descr'ption of pro(p////y/Jpc/,/µyty o address Date
f cv 155. _/ r(/, •G'&.� /Fa
0;
-A-174,0 L /3 s -� .`C �L 1..L 3
<srY J' r- yS
/yam
9 - P, Ass —/�1�_/ /F �� - /7-,yf�
a _rise — (fIzi /q
I5,
lG .
17 .
I
20
Z ( ..
April 21, 1984
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. ,85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position in regards to YZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material .
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine.
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as.
1 . Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units .
2. increased traffic.
3 . Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5 . Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential .
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33 .09 No.
1. of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6. We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12,000sq' .
8 . Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zoning.
Name Description of property or address Date
'2_1LL9 J3I
Io
1z .
3 . __________
i4 •
L ( ..
April 21, 1984
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. 85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position in regards to PZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material .
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine.
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as.
1 . Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units.
2 . increased traffic.
3 . Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5 . Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential .
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33 .09 No.
1. of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6. We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12,000sd' .
P . Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zoning.
Name Description of property or address Date
2 , /Jam(CeGt_ /( S s- - c . i �-2/
?- (cr. ,vL r ` ��.. - - S � C -
-g 3_ S, .. -24 —8 e
7 r
l�y� :
1
•
�0
� z .
i4
15 ------------- -- — —-----
L � •
I/ • -_ ---- -- . ...... ........
2
\
April 21, 1984
City of Apache Junction
1001 North Idaho Road
Apache Junction Ariz. 85220
Honorable Mayor and
Council Members:
This letter is to reaffirm our position iii regards to YZ-32-83, in-
asmuch as Randall Industries has seen fit to postpone for four weeks
and submit new material.
We at no time have ever objected regarding two story buildings, if
Randall Industries wants to build two story, on one half acre lots,
fine.
We do reaffirm all our protests which are on our orginal protest
petition, such as .
1 . Higher denisty which will be a 400% increase. 81 units just can't
be as desirable as 20 units.
2 . increased traffic.
3 . Additional noise.
4. Has been CR1 since 1974.
5. Is the only CR1 south of US 60 for residential.
6. In our opinion if passed will be in violation of Sec. 33 .09 No.
1. of the Zoning Ordinance. At the Sept. 20th meeting of the P&Z
Joe Gero acknowledged that Med. density was an oversight on the
master plan and should have been low density. You have since passed
Resolution No. 83-62 Unanimous. Thus making it low density without
any reservations.
7. Perhaps a compromise could be worked out as stated in our Sept. 12th
letter to P&Z. Item No. 6 . We would not object to a smaller lot size
perhaps 12, 000sq' .
8 . Our main concern is the density , and the threat of CR5 spreading
throughout our CR1 zonincr.
Mame Desertion of property or address Date
ir
r
I
7
j�
a7
(0 ,
Il .
► z .
i4 .
I S.
I?
l � •
ITEM NO . 8
Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO . 219 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE
BE WAIVED .
(NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry, if the vote is not unanimous,
the clerk must read the entire ordinance. )
Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 219 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE SECOND READING .
Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO. 219 BE ACCEPTED WITH AMENDMENTS .
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO . 219 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ,
ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE
RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ;
REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ,
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS
OR CONDITIONS REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL :
1 . THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER
AND FIRE DEPARTMENT.
2 . STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY DEVELOP-
MENT GUIDE .
3 . THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FINAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS .
4 . THAT THE PERIMETER WALL BE RECESSED AT VARIOUS INTERVALS , AND
THAT WALL HEIGHTS VARY FROM 3 . 5 FEET TO 6 FEET .
5 . LANDSCAPING ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGES CONSIST OF NATURALIZING
OR NATIVE VEGETATION SUCH AS PALO VERDE TREES , OCOTILLOS , PALM
TREES , BARREL AND SAGUARO CACTI .
FOR APPROVAL
•
ITEM NO . 8
Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO. 219 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE
BE WAIVED .
(NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous ,
the clerk must read the entire ordinance. )
Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 219 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR
THE SECOND READING .
Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO . 219 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED .
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE
NO. 219 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ,
ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-32-83 FROM CR-1 SINGLE
RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ;
REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ,
BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED .
FOR DENIAL
(-----
PQACHF✓G
tz ` O
U . i z
'1Riz . Vitt' o� ipaclie c&unction
April 24, 1984
Amilk
MEMORANDUM a:1 MAYOR & COUNCIL
THROUGH: ,,CITY MANAGER
FROM: :/ijCOMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
At the Parks & Recreation Commission regular meeting on April 23, 1984
the Commission reviewed talent bank applications of those interested
in serving.
A motion unanimously passed to invite the applicants to our next meet-
ing for a brief introduction.
A recommendation will then be made to the council for appointment at
the June 5, 1984 city council meeting.
The absence of one member will not affect the commissions operations
for the next few weeks.
Your consideration of postponing this item until June 5 is appreciated.
pw
Approver for Agenda 4e--'
p I, Item N
First Reading Si% 9
Second Reading
Public Hearing
`� Old Business
- New Business
-Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982.8002
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
ITEM # Ci MEET I NG OF
MOTION BY: 501
SECONDED BY:
YES NO ABSTAINED
VICE MAYOR FTDSON V
COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR
COUNCILMAN lip L
_COUNCILMAN SHANKS
.COUNCILMAN DAMIANO
_MAYOR CLARKE _
UNANPOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
/1111.
41Kr
•
•
•
• -a ,t �
s Ma v� a, _�.CR�• :;.,.F 7�J.. � .a 'L 't.e mt .3; }2..,-Y ''+ ayk i .asH�''? k<:: ep. ' ��a4 s'' C:..r+- , as.-• l.
•
•
ITEM NO . 9
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE
APPOINTMENT TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION BE CONTINUED UNTIL
THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 5 , 1984 .
PQACHF✓
U ,y Z
........„;
qRl �, i ilk o� �paclieunction
zo
..
April 24, 1984
MEMORANDUM T . HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ‘1CITY MANAGER/PERSONNEL OFFICER
SUBJECT: I( APPOINTMENTS TO THE PERSONNEL BOARD
The appointment terms for both Midge Conway and Marvin Halbert,
Personnel Board members, have expired. Mrs. Conway has indicated
her desire to be reappointed to the Personnel Board and we have
been unable to contact Mr. Halbert.
It is, therefore, recommended that Mrs. Midge Conway be reappointed
to the Personnel Board, said term to expire November 7, 1984. It
is further recommended that the appointment for the other vacancy
be continued indefinitely until such time as there are talent bank
applications from individuals interested in serving on that board.
...
MJMc/jtl
Approver for Agenda
Da a Item I
First Reading `�/ !/ / D
Second Reading
Public Hearing
Old Business
New Business
Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
•
ITEM # 0 MEETING OF 6///.W
Nj
MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: (L)6)//11-'1
YES NO ABSTAINED
COUNC ILMAN SHANKS V
COUNCILMAti DAMIANO
COUNC I LMAN STEELSMITH I
VICEMAYOR EIDSON
CO N LMAN TAYLOR
U C I
COUNCILMAN, I L L
_I1
_ .MAYO.R CLARKE
UNANI'. US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
.. w£-. "'..: •E -tt"kif rar"'i n2r C'" i L„"'r`t'` - `n,;;,if!&P`W,. 'v..-x4 ,,.,
'.... ITEM NO. 10
BE, IT 1ESOLVED BY THE Y R AN
C TY C UNCIL 0 TH�CIT OF ACH JUN TION AR ONA TH T M G
CO AY B REAPP INTER TO E P RSON LARD , SAI TE TO EX JR
NOVE ER 1984 .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE APPOINTMENT3TO THE REMAINING VACANCQFSBE
CONTINUED , UNTIL MORE TALENT BANK APPLICATIONS ARE RECEIVED .
Ink, -
�QpC'HF ✓fi
a C�
1• k i i
J f n
tF
4{yfi.�n_I
rN-1%?/ZOW' c6 /-
ty O, . &47Gzche unction
April 24, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: Y(,-7- 1CITY MANAGER
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: CITY ENGINEER C1-- •
SUBJECT: PW-83-3 (IDAHO RD./HWY.60) IMPROVEMENT)
FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST TO NESBITT CONTRACTING CO., INC.
Final approval of payment in the amount of $11,400 is hereby recommended to Nesbitt
Contracting Co. , Inc. The contract award was for the amount of $37,840 plus Change
Order #1 in the amount of $2, 520 totaling $40, 360 which was approved by the City Council
and paid to the contractor.
Following project completion, errors were noted on the plans and in the bid documents
relating to quantities. Upon measurement and verification with the contractor, the
amounts as shown on the attached invoice are correct. The total amount due the con—
tractor for this project is $51,760.00 less the contract award of $40,360 (which in—
cludes Change Order #1 ).
This project is hereby accepted as completed with the contractor's standard guarantee
of one (1 ) year from the acceptance date by the City Council.
JB:jw
Attachment
•
Approver for Agenda zee--
Dates/ Item #
First Reading -' 1/
Second leading
Public Hearing
- Old Business
New Business
- Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
Ill;S 13111 TELEPHONE 894-2831
CONTRACTING CO.
NESBITT CONTRACTING CO., INC. INC
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
POST OFFICE BOX 1269 • MESA, ARIZONA 85201
F- -1 JOB NAME Idaho Road Improvements
TO City of Apache Junction PW-83-3
1001 N. Idaho Our Job #84-02
Apache Junction, Arizona 85220
Attn: Jim Bakkedahl I DATE: April 11, 1984
City Engineer Invoice # 84-04-06
STATEMENT
"REVISION"
NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1. Compacted Fill 170 CY $ 5 00 $ 850.00
2. Excavated Cut 1610 CY 3.00 4,830.00
3 Remove AC Pavement 1200 SY 3.00 3,600 00
4. Realign Ditch 280 LF 13.00 3,640.00
5. Curb & Gutter 184 LF 8.00 1,472.00
6. Curb Return 359 LF 8.00 2,872 00
7. Depressed Driveway 48 LF 8.00 384.00
8. 2" AC & 9" Base (Street) 3318 SY 8.00 26,544 00
9. 2" AC & 4" Base (Driveway) 169 SY 6.00 1 ,014.00
10. 24" Concrete Pipe 15 LF 60 00 900 00
11. 3" PVC Conduit 165 LF 7.00 1,155.00
12. #7 Pull Boxes 4 EA 116.00 464 00
13. Remove & Replace Brass Cap 1 EA 85.00 85.00
14. Trim Edge of Pavement 1133 LF 1.00 1,133.00
Change Order #1
1. Sawcut Pavement 135 LF 1.00 13_`".6*'
2. Remove Existing Curb 135 LF 4.00 540..,J
3. Remove Pavement 24 SY 3.00 72.00
4. Install 6" Vertical Curb & Gutter 132 LF 10.00 1 ,320.00
5. Install Curb Transition 3 LF 10 00 30 00
6. Replace 2" AC over 8" ABC 24 SY 30.00 720.00
Total Amount Due $51,760..00
Less Previously
Paid (40,360.00)
NET DUE (FINAL) $11 ,400 .00
THIS INVOICE CONTAINS
S 1q 5,5. 4 SALES TAX
c ..... —
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
1 /11/4/)
\ LP° 2,/
V 6 , 'Pj
ITEM # :(6MEETING OF C i
POTION BY: SECONDED BY:
Y NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR f
,� COUNCILMAN HILL ► ✓
/
CO U_NC I LN AN SHANKS V
VICE_MAYOR EIDSON
V
MAN DAMIANO
COUNCIL / ,
4-COUNCILMAN STEELSP1.ITJi j _
__MAYOR_CLARKF :
UNANI!IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL ---7
•
•
•
•
•
ITEM NO . 11
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE
ADDITIONAL PAYMENT TO NESBITT CONTRACTING COMPANY , INC . , IN THE AMOUNT
OF $11 , 400 . 00 FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO .
PW-83-3 , BE APPROVED AND AUTHORIZATION TO MAKE PAYMENT TO NESBITT
CONTRACTING COMPANY , INC . , BE GRANTED .
i
PQACHE�G'LL
v It z
\\...........
--'��° c ity o� &paci e unction
'9R/ZOO'
April 24, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: CITY MANAGER
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ,c?
FROM: CITY ENGINEER '4•6.
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOP AGENDA ITEM — MAY 1, 1984
(AB-84-6 RESOLUTION NO. 84-9)
GENERAL INFORMATION: Approver for Agenda
tte� Item #
APPLICANTS: MICHAEL KOVACS First Reading Si/�'
RICHARD KOVACS Second Reading
DAN RAFFERTY
VINCE MATOUSEK - Public Hearing
- Old Business
PARCELS: 100-25-2 New Business
100-25-4 B ..Consent Agenda
100-25-5
STREETS REQUESTED: North Bowman Road (Between East Lost Dutchman Boulevard
and North Apache Trail — Highway 88).
North Chaparral Road (Between East Lost Dutchman Boulevar
and North Apache Trail — Highway 88).
STREET CONDITION: Unimproved (Not Opened).
D.C.C. COMMENTS:
The committee is reviewing this abandonment at its April 26, 1984 meeting.
Comments will be presented at the May 1, 1984 Council Meeting.
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
PROPOSED MOTION:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona, that in case number AB-84-6, Resolution No. 84-9, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING
THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY ON NORTH
BOWMAN ROAD BETWEEN EAST LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND NORTH APACHE TRAIL
(HIGHWAY 88); AND NORTH CHAPARRAL ROAD BETWEEN EAST LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD
AND NORTH APACHE TRAIL (HIGHWAY 88), AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE
AB-84--6, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY
ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY, " is
hereby (approved) (denied).
JBB:jw
Aft. Amok.
,„
I CHF,,G'L
' ,1;"$ ,,yyi�n
;iiii,i;: : ,b
,, ,"qPizoo Vity o acne unction
April 26, 1984
MEMORANDUM TO. ,/7 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: gITY MANAGER
FROM: CHAIRMAN - DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE {'
REGARDING: AB 84-6 (KOVACS)
The Development Coordinating Committee reviewed the application on
April 26, 1984, and has no objection to the request for abandonment.
l
1
.m.
RWB:sh
cc: DCC Committee Members
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
/1•11k Asir
RESOLUTION NO 84-9
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY
PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON
NORTH BOWMAN ROAD AND NORTH CHAPARRAL ROAD BETWEEN EAST
LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND NORTH APACHE TRAIL (HIGHWAY 88),
AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-84-6, ARE NO
LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY
ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY
WHEREAS, the Pinal County Board of Supervisors and the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, entered into a cooperation agreement dated
January 25, 1982, where it was agreed to abandonment of federally patented
easements on the property described in this Resolution, and
WHEREAS, the requested abandonments are easements for public
- rights-of-way purposes described as these parcels of land located in
Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base
and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and more particularly
described as follows.
Parcel No 1
The west thirty-three (33') feet of the north i of the
Northeast - of the Northeast a of the Northwest 1,
EXCEPT the north fifty (50') feet thereof, and the south
portion lying Southeasterly of the Northwesterly
right-of-way line of State Highway 88 thereof.
Parcel No. 2-
The east thirty-three (33') of the east z of the Northwest
'-, of the Northeast-4 of the Northwest '„ EXCEPT the north
fifty (50') feet thereof, and the south portion lying
Southeasterly of the Northwesterly right-of-way of
- State Highway 88 thereof, and
The west thirty-three (33') feet of the east 1 of the
Northwest '-, of the Northeast 1 of the Northwest 1,
• EXCEPT the north fifty (50') feet thereof, and that
portion lying Southeasterly of the Northwesterly right-of-way
of State Highway 88 thereof
Parcel No 3
The east thirty-three (33') feet of the west i of the
Northwest '-, of the Northwest '-, of the Northeast 1 of
the Northwest 1, EXCEPT the north fifty (50') feet
thereof, and that part lying Southeasterly of the
e l _ � s_xa Northwesterly right-of-way line of State Highway 88 thereof.
WHEREAS, the abandonments requested, if approved, would not
leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established
public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, or
have access by a federally patented easement which may in the future
be developed, and
- WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona, finds that these said federally patented easements for public
• rights-of-way purposes as described herein are classified as local
streets on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan and are no
longer necessary for public use as roadways; and
WHEREAS, these said easements requested for abandonment have
never been improved as public roadways and maintained by a local
governing agency.
^ J
r
n� �sN
RESOLUTION NO. 84-9
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY
PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY PURPOSES ON
NORTH BOWMAN ROAD AND NORTH CHAPARRAL ROAD BETWEEN EAST
LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND NORTH APACHE TRAIL (HIGHWAY 88),
AS DESCRIBED,IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-84-6, ARE NO LONGER
NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED
AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY.
WHEREAS, the Pinal County Board of Supervisors and the City
of Apache Junction, Arizona, entered into a cooperation agreement dated
January 25, 1982, where it was agreed to abandonment of federally patented
easements on the property described in this Resolution, and
WHEREAS, the requested abandonments are easements for public
rights—of—way purposes described as these parcels of land located in
Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base
and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and more particularly
described as follows:
Parcel No 1
The west thirty—three (33') feet of the North ; of the
Northeast a of the Northeast } of the Northwest 1,
EXCEPT the north thirty—three (33') feet thereof, and
the south portion lying Southeasterly of the Northwesterly
right—of—way line of State Highway 88 thereof.
Parcel No. 2:
The east thirty—three (33') feet of the east 1 of the
Northwest 1 of the Northeast 1 of the Northwest },
EXCEPT the north thirty—three (33') feet thereof,
/ and the south portion lying Southeasterly of the
Northwesterly right—of—way of State Highway 88 thereof,
I( and
/ O The west thirty—three (33') feet of the east = of the
Northwest 'l of the Northeast '—, of the Northwest '-4,
EXCEPT the north thirty—three (33') feet thereof, and
that portion lying Southeasterly of the Northwesterly
right—of—way of State Highway 88 thereof.
Parcel No 3
The east thirty—three (33') feet of the west i of the
Northwest a of the Northwest } of the Northeast 1 of
the Northwest 1, EXCEPT the north thirty—three (33')
feet thereof, and that part lying Southeasterly of the
Northwesterly right—of—way line of State Highway 88
thereof
WHEREAS, the abandonments requested, if approved, would not
leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established
public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, or
have access by a federally patented easement which may in the future
be developed, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona, finds that these said federally patented easements for public
rights—of—way purposes as described herein are classified as local
streets on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan and are no
longer necessary for public use as roadways: and
WHEREAS, these said easements requested for abandonment have
never been improved as public roadways and maintained by a local
governing agency
RESOLUTION NO 84-9
PAGE TWO
NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above—described ��`
federally patented easements reserved for public rights—of—way purposes
are hereby abandoned and extinguished as present or future public
rights—of—way.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the abandonment of the public
rights—of—way has no effect on reservations for public utility
easements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
- OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 84
•
Wendell J. Clarke
Mayor
.,
ATTEST
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
- APPROVED AS TO FORM
�",..,
David F. Alexander
City Attorney
Resolution No. 84-9
Page Two of Two
-4 1 --.^ L A.by` — — -U ei J. _I 16 U
e w ur _
I 1 I
Q r-1 i I I O ' I
�J \/ I 1
s
o I I
m i I . : .. _. . .
® 7 1 ' O �� 7 . . . ,
r 1 I N I—! !N
Y▪ i
I6.. I .i
L.,d Ai \
I I
S 'r�1
O r. (nl I
I:.I
01 I 4
f.n.afat%Y tyI,.x' - - as - -Iva yvdvND I--- v4r/3_+I arvod
I
OObi I h 1
I� V H 6•
1 I 1
II
1 LT
- I
......, . .... : , ,,. _..,
1
1 ..
H
I � I i� . ,.. .. . .. ...._ . ..
6Iti
1 . . . ..... , • . .
II III I I I
I I
I I
6° 1 I
ao
I I I
i , . - .., . '.,cod
eZ i I I 1 O
a
o
N O I O 1 O I of
a L
1 1I µ y r II.L
w 1 . 0. 1 I. . • • pV717
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
fre(1
?).,) ,
ITEf1 #
v MEETING OF � f /W
in( 0
NOTION BY : SECONDED BY : 14-6"
YE NO ABSTAINED
MIT M! t! • AND
COUNCILMAN HILL
COIUNC LLEAN_TAYLOR
_.C_O.UNC ILMAN ,SHANKS
,lI CF _MAYOR EIDSON
,-COUNCILMAN
_ STEELSM I TI4 '///
MAYOR CLARKE •
UNANI".OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
swot*_ 01•0,
ANN irk
.
•
•
•
ITEM NO . 12
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT RESOLUTION
NO . 84-9 , A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED
EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON NORTH BOWMAN ROAD BETWEEN EAST
LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND NORTH APACHE TRAIL (HIGHWAY 88 ) ; AND NORTH
CHAPARRAL ROAD BETWEEN EAST LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND NORTH APACHE
TRAIL ( HIGHWAY 88 ) , AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-84-6 ,
ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY
ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ,
BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED .
(SI.ACHF )
srt '41 Gt
10:
µ4i 4 rY
'1RizoNP `Oity o ` padre unction
April 19, 1984
MEMORANDU -) MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THROUGH: CITY MANAGER
FROM: j3COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT
SUBJECT: LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND APPLICATION
The Arizona Outdoor Recreation Coordinating Commission has recently informed
us of the availability of an estimated one million dollars for Arizona through
the Land and Water Conservation Fund (L.W.C.F. ) .
A letter of intent to apply for these funds and a preliminary application must
be submitted as soon as possible, while a complete application is due by June
1, 1984.
A provision of local matching funds for at least 50% of project cost is re-
quired. Our match will depend on the upcoming Budget-override election, in
which we can use the 300,000.00 earmarked for Prospector Park Development.
My recommendation is to allow us to proceed with the preliminary application
to acquire L.W.C.F. for development of Prospector Park.
Your consideration of this recemmendation is appreciated .
pw
Approver for Agenda ,ge,_—
Date/ Item #
First Reading ���XY , 43
Second Reading
Public Hearing
- Old Business
_NZ New Business
-Consent Agenda
1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
i t°`
rf
1 i- 113 L
ITEM # 13 ,1r � /)/EETI�dG OF (
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 917/n'V'
YES NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH
COUNCILMAN SHANKS
COUNCILMAN HILL \j(/
COUNC I Lr1AN TAYLOR
CO UNC I LMAN DAM I ANO \%/
VICE rAYOR EIDSON V/ ,
MAYOR CLARKE
UNANI US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
•
•
•
•
/
•
Tzyjda.�ac1} _t4T'7" +A Ly°^•• «'4Q'a
�Y
•
r\ - _
'K giYy4,..0 'S'u.- r •
.•._ -... ,i . .: +, a ., ,,.._ �kJ-�St'S .. . `u c a�Et+L xk.;.x&,•�ay4n?9 ar.�+§'tU}��:;�5'2`�� :-aa �>+3 a•.,f�P' v�
ITEM NO . 13
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT COMMUNITY
SERVICES BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH THE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION TO
ACQUIRE LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUNDS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PROSPECTOR
PARK .
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
\rrk
ITEM # MEETING OF
MOT I ON BY: d61(4- SECONDED BY
Y S NO ABSTAINED
VICE MAYOR i ►
COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH .
COUNCILMAN N TAYLOR
COUNCILMAN lin L
COUNCILMAN SHANKS
J
.COUNCILMAN DAMIANO
1D
MAYOR CLARKE
UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
Ai ilk
•
•
•
- - - r s M y j;.?.y^Y
ITEM NO . 14
11 I- LSULVLD BY I II MHYIIK AND-
CITY- COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACH , -BONA , THAT A WORK-
S , A-T 7: 00 P .M . , IN I H-E CITY C 8-U N C I t
CHAM-B-E -S-:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE
HELD ON MAY 15 , 1984 , AT 6 : 00 P .M . , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS .
(47CHi)N
n2
• O
Z
xlRizoNP it/ C c94pa,che ,o9unctivn
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
April 11 , 1984
MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI
THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/
-1 ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR(22 t
FROM: ` l��,.) JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Attached please find a copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of their meeting of March 27, 1984.
Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in
the City Clerk' s Office.
JAN:mas
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA
MARCH 27, 1984
700PM
MINUTES
Present Absent Guests
Mr Polomskey Mr Rogers List of attendees
Mr Sansoni available in Planning
Mr. Taylor Office.
Mrs. Conway
Mr Vehon
Mr Sanchez, Chairman
Mr. McNulty, Acting Planning Director
Mr Nakagawa, Acting Executive Secretary
Mrs Samuelson, Recording Secretary
Synopsis
Agenda of March 27, 1984 - approved as presented.
Minutes of March 13, 1984 - approved as presented
PZ-35-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 236) - continued to May 8, 1984
PZ-53-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 247) - recommended for approval.
PZ-56-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 251) - recommended for approval with amendments
PZ-5-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 258) - continued to April 10, 1984
PZ-7-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 260) - recommended for approval.
c PZ-8-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 261) - recommended for approval
PZ-9-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 262) - recommended for approval
PZ-13-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 271) - Commission initiative authorized.
Work session to discuss Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee set for
April 19, 1984.
1. Chairman after the Pledge of Allegiance was recited,
asked the recording secretary to call the roll.
2 Mrs Samuelson called the roll and determined that six members
were present with one absent, as noted above.
She informed the Commission that Mr Rogers had
a prior commitment
3. Chairman acknowledged the presence of Mayor Clarke There
being no additions or deletions to the Agenda
dated March 27, 1984, he called for a motion.
4 Conway/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
�F �, that the Agenda dated March 27, 1984 be approved
as presented."
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0)
5 Chairman there being no additions, deletions, or corrections
to the Minutes dated March 13, 1984, he called
for a motion
6. Taylor/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that the Minutes dated March 13, 1984 be approved
as presented."
The motion passed 5-0-1, with Mrs Conway
abstaining
7. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-35-83, Proposed
Ordinance No 236, rezoning from GR to TH in
Section 17, and asked for staff briefing
8. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case
r
r
Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
9 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case.
10. Howell Anderson stated that the request was for an extension of
1655 N. Ironwood an already existing park that had been there for
about 10 years He added that he has a buyer
who can upgrade the park
-^ 11 Mr Taylor said that the property is a higher density than
allowed by the General Plan. He asked if there
would be a problem doing a Planned Development.
12 Mr Anderson replied that he made the application prior to
the Plan and that his plan is just as important
as the City's He added that if the buyer does
not buy the park, the park will not be advanced,
and that it would be impossible to develop the
park under a PD since he would have to borrow
the money to do it.
13. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, he asked
if there was anyone who wished to speak in opposition.
14. Al Meyer stated that he lives across the street from the
1765 N Valley Dr project in a house and is against the rezoning
15. Frances Ramirez said she lives south of the site She stated
1686 N Valley Dr that she went through the park and it is cluttered
with trash and debris and she does not want it
o A by her home
16. James Corning commented that he had just moved here and saw
1292 W Tepee the park which he said the City could not be
proud of.
i 17 Clymene Mills 1937 N. Valley Dr was opposed to the project as it would cause
noise and the added traffic would add to the
dust problem.
18 Gene Smith stated that his property borders the park on
1356 W. Tepee the east end and if expanded will also be on
the north. He commented that this is not the
neatest park in town.
- 19. Jimmy Carter said he is Mr. Smith's neighbor and was also
1320 W Tepee opposed to the park for the same reasons
20. Jack Tandy commented that he borders the park on the north
1851 N Ironwood and this property would also be on the east and
he would be half-way surrounded by junk
21. Everett Filkey was also against the proposed rezoning due to
- 1988 N Valley Dr. the dusty roads and unpleasant appearance
22 Chairman there being no other opposition, asked for
staff comments.
23. Mr Nakagawa stated that the rezoning would potentially allow
for more density that the General Plan allows,
and recommended that if the rezoning is approved
a Planned Development be required He stated
that there is a petition opposing the park on
file He said there is also an additional letter
from Mr Tandy. He added that the purchaser
wishes to address the Commission
24 Chairman asked if the applicant would like to speak in
rebuttal.
25. Mr Corning commented that he had brought a letter protesting
the project to the office and that his name was
not mentioned as one of the protestors
Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
26 Mr. Nakagawa stated that he has to go by County Assessor's
records for valid petitions and that there
is already enough to require a 3/4's vote
27 Chairman asked the buyer if he would like to speak.
28 Glenn Pratt stated that he made an offer to buy the park
-?` -`2 2555 W Madero, Mesa including the additional ten acres contingent
on getting the rezoning He said it will be /lak
turned into a private ownership park, he will
put in street lights, pave roads and put in some
driveways He added the trash will also be
cleaned up. He said that all objections fall
into categories that will be upgraded
29. Chairman asked him if there would be a problem using a PD
30 Mr Pratt replied that he did not know what he would be
getting into, but he had the impression it was
_ an open ended plan. He stated he would like to
look at examples of completed projects.
31 Chairman commented that it was a pre-planned development
submitted to the City He asked if he would like
to get with Mr Anderson and continue the hearing
until this was decided.
32 Mr Pratt said his impression was that it would take a
year or longer to get approval and that he
did not want to waste money if the plans did
not get approved and there were no guarantees
that it could be done He added that he was
in favor of any way that would work and would be
approved. He said he would be willing to
work out something with the Planning Department.
33 Mr. Nakagawa stated that they cannot guarantee that it will
be approved or that anything could be worked up
in 30 days He said the plans must satisfy the
City's requirements.
34 Chairman asked if 30 days was satisfactory
35 Mr. Pratt replied that it was.
36. Carolyn Anderson could not understand the neighbors complaining
1655 N Ironwood about the trash since it is not the renters doing it.
She noted that her security guard had seen people
bringing in and dumping trash
37 Chairman asked if there was any rebuttal from the opposition
38 Ms. Ramirez asked what would happen if the plan is approved
and Mr Pratt backs out She commented that she
had seen cars coming out of the park with boxes
which they piled on the existing trash
39 Chairman noted that the City will be able to keep a close
watch on the development of the plan. There
being no further rebuttal, he closed the public
hearing and called for Commission deliberation
40 Mrs Conway inquired if this rezoning was a Commission
Initiative and wanted to see the requirements on the
transmittal until the Ordinance was amended.
41 Mr. Nakagawa replied that they never got the required number
of signatures and that the Commission did authorize
it for a public hearing
42. Chairman called for a motion.
Auk
Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
43. Taylor/Sansone M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona, that PZ-35-83, also known as Proposed
Ordinance No. 236, application of Howell and
Carolyn Anderson for their property described
as a matter of public record requesting rezoning
from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone
? �^ (TH), be continued to May 8, 1984, at 7.00 p m ,
Aissik 'in these Chambers, to allow for the possibility
( of reapplying under Planned Development and a
general smoothing out of the application "
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0).
44 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-53-83, a rezoning
from GR to TH in Section 18, and asked for staff
briefing.
45 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case
46. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case.
47 Keith Stachar stated that he wanted to make three smaller
28 N. Ironwood individual lots for mobile homes and that this
would be compatible with the existing property.
48 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor of the case,
asked if anyone wished to speak in oppostion.
49 Floyd Davis said he was located southwest of the site and
929 N. Warner Dr. did not want to be in someone's back yard He
commented on the private road between his property
and the subject site and asked about the fence.
50. Sherwood Mooney stated he owns property to the south and pays
P 0 Box 2014 taxes on the private road. He asked that the
fence be left or that the applicant use
Greasewood as an entrance to his property
51. Chairman asked for staff recommendation.
52. Mr Nakagawa stated there would be no objection to the rezoning
Ark and recommended the stipulation of dedication of
right-of-way He commented on the opposition's
comments on the private roadway He said that
Mr. Stachar's access will be known by the title
company
53. Mr. Stachar stated that the frontage on all three lots would
be Greasewood and that the woven fence on the
• south is the boundary line of the property which
he has no intention of taking down.
54 Chairman asked if there was any rebuttal from the opposition.
55 Mr Davis asked if the lots would be for sale or for rent
since he can sell the lots and the fence would
come down.
56. Mr Stachar stated that he would rent the lots.
57 Mr Taylor noted that no matter what happens the fence
could be taken down since it is Mr. Stachar's.
58 Mr Mooney stated he did not mind if they took the fence
down, but did not want anyone else using the
private road
59. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion
Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
60. Polomskey/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that rezoning case PZ-53-83, also known as Proposed
Ordinance No 247, application of Keith and
Kathryn Stachar for their property described as
a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from
GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH),
^ that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction
'City Council the approval of said application
Any stipulations or recommendations are
The applicant dedicate the north and east
thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property
for public roadway and associated purposes.
The reasons for the recommendation are
1 The request is in compliance with the
General Plan medium density designation
for the site.
2 The request is compatible with surrounding
properties "
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0)
61. Chairman noted the presence of Vice Mayor Eidson. He
opened the public hearing on PZ-56-83, an
=w amendment to Article 28 of the Zoning Ordinance,
and asked for staff briefing.
62. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission stating that this was an
amendment to the procedures and requirements
for changing the zoning ordinance and the
zoning district boundaries
63 Mr McNulty stated this would bring the Zoning Ordinance
into conformance with State law with ample
notification by certified mail.
64. Commission discussion on 60 day time limit in Section 2806
and approval of a rezoning even if not in conforma,
with the General Plan and 90 days being more
feasible
65 Mrs Conway wanted to add to Section 2805 a requirement for
advertising in the Apache Junction newspapers
so that everyone will be well informed
66 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in
wa :`.; .- opposition, he called for the Planning Department
comments.
67. Al Bellucci commented that this was a step in the right
2386 N. Valley Rd. direction
68 Mr Nakagawa stated that staff is requesting that a County
Assessor's map be provided, and that there
may be a problem posting 10 places in the City
69 Mr. McNulty noted that one additional item being added was
that any rezoning being granted was only good
for 24 months if substantial development did
not occur within that time.
70. Chairman asked again if there was anyone to speak to
favor or in opposition; there was no one
He closed the public hearing and called for
Commission discussion
7T. Commission conducted further discussion on 60 day time
clock
Aink, Aiwa.
Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
72. Conway/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that Ordinance No 251, 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING 'THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II,
�- 4 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1 , ZONING ORDINANCE,'
.BY AMENDING 'ARTICLE 28, ZONING ORDINANCE
Aloft, AMENDMENTS AND ZONE CHANGES' , REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY,
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY,' be recommended to
the Apache Junction City Council for approval with
the following amendments to include references
made by City staff on March 27, 1984 transmittal
memo to the Commission
1 Section 2806 - 60 day time clock be extended
to 90 days
- 2 Section 2804 - a County Assessor's map
of the proposed rezoning area and the area
within 300 feet of the site be submitted
3 Section 2805 - "or may not" be inserted
after "may" and before "notify" in the
last paragraph
4. Section 2805 - insertion in fourth paragraph
of "by petition" between "amendment" and
"involves" and "cause to be notified" between
"shall" and "by certified mail."
5. Section 2802 - insertion of "by petition"
between "application" and "for" in first
sentence, and "cause to be notified" between
"notify" and "by certified mail" at bottom
of paragraph.
6 Section 2808 - insertion of "one week"
between "Tuesday" and "preceding" changing
"preceding" to "from "
7. Include the two local newspapers in the
notice published in Section 2805, second
paragraph "
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0)
73 Chairman after a ten-minute recess, the meeting resumed
at 9.00 p m He opened the public hearing on
PZ 5-84, and asked for staff briefing
74 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case.
75. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case
76 Bill Warin stated he was a partner in ICAM and purchased the
1548 E Hale, Mesa property 12 years ago for potential growth
purposes. He stated the City needed more
commercial, more retail, and more apartments in
this area He said he was requesting the rezoning
for future development and benefit of the tax base
77 Mrs. Conway noted that unless the development was up to the
Trail there could be an access problem
78 Mr Warin stated that with frontage on Thunderbird there
would be no problem
r►
r
t
Page Seven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
79. Mr. Taylor asked if a zoning of a lesser category would be
suitable for development plan He added that the
residential area was worried about the CB-2
catch-alls
80 Mr Warin questioned a lesser zoning. He stated that if
apartments are being considered on the east side
.-r - there would not be enough density for development
'in that area /�
I 81. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if
there was anyone to speak in opposition
82. Bill McDaniel stated he owns property on south on Thunderbird
483 S Higo Circle He said there should be a buffer between CB-2
and the present residential area He added that
there are traffic problems there now He said
the Church will object since certain CB-2
businesses were not in the best interest of the
Church
83. Mr. Sansoni asked what he would recommend as a buffer zone
84 Mr McDaniel replied something lesser than what was in CB-2
85. Mrs. Conway asked if he would feel better if it was a Planned
Development
86. Mr. McDaniel replied they would have a better idea of what was
*§ ,F_, going in He added that no other exit exists
out of area now but Thunderbird to the Trail
87 Wayne Milligan represented the 1st Baptist Church. He said the
1050 E. Broadway deacons wrote a letter which did not represent
the body of the Church Asked for a postponement
to bring before the church body the following night
88. Chairman asked for staff comments
89 Mr Nakagawa stated the staff had no objections and that it
was consistent with the General Plan He said
that if the right-of-way was not already dedicated,
he would recommend that stipulation. He said �..,
there is a protest in the file for extending
Thunderbird to Broadway and commented that this
project would not be responsible for that
extension. He said there is also a protest
letter on file from Mr McDaniel
90 Chairman asked if there was any rebuttal from the applicant
^F 5�' ION— z�V. - ; °.,. 91. Mr. Warin commented on the buffer zone stating that this
would be a high quality development with a
6 foot concrete wall around the property
92. Chairman asked if there was any objection to applying for
CR-5
93. Mr Warin replied that he needed a higher density if it
becomes multi-family He said a lesser zoning
would not be viable and that at this time they
cannot commit to a specific plan
94. Mrs. Conway stated that the plan is vague and that he is
asking the Commission to sign a blank check
95 Mr Warin after considerable discussion on applying for
a lesser zoning or going Planning Development,
agreed to having this item continued for 2 weeks
and considering a PD He noted that he could
not come up with a PD in two weeks
96 Chairman noted he could consider it and then the Commission
- could move on his request
i
Page Eight - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
97 Mr. Vehon stated that looking at the property, the
owner could not be forced into a PD
98 Chairman asked if there was any rebuttal from the
opposition
99 Mr Milligan stated there would be water problems if a wall
,was erected. He said they did not want anything
r► offensive to the Church.
100 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion
101. Taylor/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that PZ-5-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance
No 258, application of ICAM Properties and
Clara Carney for their property described as a
matter of public record, requesting rezoning
from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business
- Zone, be continued to April 10, 1984, at 7 00 p m ,
in these Chambers, to consider the possibility
of a Planned Development and to allow us to look
into other options rather than to approve or
deny this request tonight "
The motion passed 5-1-0 with Mr. Vehon dissenting.
102 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-7-84, and asked
for staff briefing
103 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case.
104. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case
. r
105 Doise Hubbard stated he has made an offer to put in 7 buildings,
453 N. Lomavista, Mesa 28 apartments which will increase the value of
the neighborhood.
106 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition,
asked for staff comments.
107 Mr Nakagawa stated there was no objection, that it would be
consistent with the General Plan and recommendation of
a stipulation of dedication of right-of-way.
108. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion.
109. Conway/Sansone M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that rezoning case PZ-7-84, also known as Proposed
_ Ordinance No 260, application of Agnes Camilleri
? "$ -j through Hubbard Construction, Inc for her property
described as a matter of public record, requesting
rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple
Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends to
the Apache Junction City Council the approval of
said application.
Any stipulations or recommendations are
l The applicant
pp dedicate the west forty feet (40')
and the south fifty feet (50') of the subject
property for public roadway and associated purposes.
The reasons for this recommendation are
1. The request complies with the General Plan
2 It will definitely be an asset to the
neighborhood "
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0).
x:e
Page Nine - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
110 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-8-84, and
asked for staff briefing
111 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case
112. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case
113 Mr Hubbard stated this is a 10-acre parcel, Phase II of the
'project He said that the roads will have to
be improved He added that this will be an
asset to the community.
114 Mr. Taylor asked how many units
115 Mr Hubbard replied between 80 and 100, 1-story
116. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if
there was anyone to speak in opposition
_ 117. Bernice Muths said she has land east of the site. Asked if it
1030 N Delaware was a PD, a retirement or family development,
and if the roads would be paved through the
development.
118 Mr McNulty commented that the streets would have to be
paved on Mr. Hubbard's half.
119. Dorothy Ashcraft said that with 100 units there will be too many
1051 N Grand Dr people traveling through there since it is a
quiet section She requested that interior
roads be paved
120 Mr Sansoni asked if they were objecting to families going in
121. Mrs Ashcraft replied that multiplying families by number of
units would be too many.
122. Gail Muths wanted to know number of bedrooms, baths, and
1030 N Delaware if there would be a wall. He stated he wants
control of what goes in
123. Chairman asked for staff comments.
124. Mr. Nakagawa stated there was no objection, it was consistent
with the General Plan and he would recommend
stipulations of road dedications He said there
would be 2 bedroom units with 1 bath with 880
square feet of living area. He passed out
brochures provided by the applicant to the
Commission and to the audience.
- � 5 125. Chairman asked if the applicant would like to speak in
rebuttal.
126. Mr. Hubbard stated that there would be paved roads and privacy
fences He said the units would accomodate
retired people.
127. Chairman there being no rebuttal from the opposition,
he closed the public hearing and called for a
l motion.
128. Sansoni/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that rezoning case PZ-8-84, also known as Proposed
Ordinance No 261, application of Agnes Camilleri
through Hubbard Construction, Inc. for her property
described as a matter of public record, requesting
rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple
Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends to
the Apache Junction City Council the approval of
said application.
,+. p
Page Ten - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
Any stipulations or recommendations are
The applicant dedicate the north, east, and south
thirty-three feet (33' ) and the west forty
feet (40') of the subject property for public
roadway and associated purposes.
The reasons for this recommendation are
'wok 1 The request is more than compatible with
the General Plan.
2. It is the best and highest use of the land "
-
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0)
129 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-9-84, and asked
_ for staff briefing.
130 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case
131. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case
132 Dan Millett stated he had acquired the property 21 months ago
65 S Mesa Dr , Mesa He said it consists of 6 rental units, 5 houses
and 1 trailer and that they want to add more rental
units He added that a wash goes through the
property so they will have to conform to setbacks.
133 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in
opposition, he asked for staff comments.
134 Mr Nakagawa stated there was no objection and that it was
consistent with the General Plan.
135 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion.
136. Vehon/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that rezoning case PZ-9-84, also known as Proposed
Ordinance No 262, application of Millett Manor,
Inc for their property described as a matter of
public record, requesting rezoning from GR General
Amok
Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, that the
Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City
Council the approval of said application
The reasons for the recommendation are.
1 The request would allow this lot to meet
the General Plan designation which allows
medium/high density for this site
2. It would be compatible with the other
multi-family uses surrounding the site "
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0).
137 Chairman there were no Communications, Awards, or
Presentations, no Requests From Other Agencies,
and no Old Business. He asked for staff briefing
on PZ-13-84, Proposed Ordinance No 271 under
New Business
138. Mr. Nakagawa stated that this was a request for a Commission
Initiative to authorize a public hearing for a
rezoning from GR to CR-5 in Section 21
139. Chairman asked the applicant if he would like to address
the Commission.
t
Page Eleven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
140. Mr. Stachar represented the owners who were asking for
this rezoning He said that it is compatible
and has adequate access.
141. Chairman called for a motion
142 Vehon/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
,Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that pursuant to Section 2802 of the Zoning
Ordinance, a public hearing for a Commission
Initiated zone change from GR General Rural to
CR-5 Multiple Residence as requested by Harvey
and Shirley Weeks in case number PZ-13-84, for
their property described as.
The East z of the Southwest $ of the Northeast ;
of the Southeast ; of Section 21, Township 1
North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base
and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County,
Arizona;
is hereby authorized
• Stipulations are
The applicant submit the required zoning materials
The reason for this authorization is
The request would be in compliance with Section
2802 of the Zoning Ordinance."
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0)
143 Chairman asked for staff briefing on the next Agenda item,
motion to set a work session to discuss the
Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee
144. Mr. Nakagawa stated that at the meeting of March 13, 1984,
the Commission requested that an item be placed
on this Agenda to set a work session to discuss
the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee.
145. Chairman asked if there was any discusssion
146. Mr. Vehon stated he saw the need for the work session, but
that he would be unable to attend since he would
be attending school for 6 weeks in April and May
147. Chairman called for a motion
148. Conway/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,
that a work session be held to discuss the
Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee on April 19,
1984, at 7.00 p.m., in the Community Services
Room "
The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0).
149. Chairman there being no one to speak under Call to the
P
Public and no Information and Reports, he called
for a motion to adjourn.
150. Taylor/Conway M/S to adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 10:43 p m
Page Twelve - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 27, 1984
Recorded and transcribed by
Marge S4fl son, Recording Secretary
Respectfully submitted•
James A. Na agawa, ct ng Executive Secretary
APPROVED
en n Sanchez, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Co ' sion
tom '
•
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
4 0-9 ti
rj)j( it P 10
•
ITEM If (IP
/2 ,
MEETING OF i(iile
MOTION BY: \I) SECONDED BY: MkAA,:J9
Y,JS NO ABSTAINED
COUNCILMAN SHANKS 1 V
//
COUNCILMAJ DAMIANO
COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ////
VICE MAYOR EIDSON
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR \1\;
COUNCILMAN HILL
.MAYOR CLARKE
UNAN I"� S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
Oa.
te "��
'._ .. .. a:._ k^r.y3�...a_"_ ._&.:1i.. `�`_w3 Y.. •,c-.c.M _ L N- a - -
ITEM NO . 16
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE MEETING
BE ADJOURNED AT ' ' P . M .
eN
Yay 1, 1984
To Mayor Clark and The Apacht Junction City Council Members :
I deeply regret not being with you tonight as planned. A home
accident Friday night resulted in a broken hip. However, I am
working by telephone and plan to be back in my office in, a few
weeks.
In the mean time The Pinal Gila Council for Senior Citizens
proposes a cooperative venture with the city of Apache Junction.
Although we are very appreciative of the space provided by the
John Calvin Presbyterian church, we believe a permanent building
dedic-ted to an adult senior center would benefit not only all
seniors but the total community as well.
A large building housing both a library and a senior citizen
•enter would be a cost effective use of space. Also the close
proximity would promote use of the library by those without
transportation.
I will be pleased to wo-k with your officals in locating sources
of funding.
You might start by contacting the city of Coolidge to visit their
adult center to see this type of venture.
Another resource is the city of Florence . We are presently working
with them toward this same proposed goal.
If you have any questions you may contact me through my office at
868-5400 or 868-4166.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Fredricks
Executive Director of the Pinal-Gila Cou~cil for Senior Citizens,
AreaAgency on Aging --Region V.
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
di Pi V
0
' ;411 . /
/
4a
,,, cr/I I' ilr, (
MEETING OF �ITEM /I 3� �
MOTION BY. & (1)) SECONDED BY:
YES NO ABSTAINED
CnilNCTI MAN I MIANO
COUNCILMAN HILL
COLiNC RYA_ TAYLOR
i.0 1 - ■M\ !alum
JIICF MAYOR EIDSON
i it.%
MAYOR CLARKE
UNAN I"IO , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL \,// S
ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET
NOTES
k)fr
All
0C�
ITEC1 # 3 MEET I NG OF t/ 3°/
MOT ON BY; b460/1SECONDED BY
YES NO ABSTAINED
. H
COUNCIL"'.AN SHAM I
COUNCILMAN HILL
COUMC I WAN TAYLOR
COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V
�' Y R EIDSON
�!I CE . .A O E SON
MAYOR CLARKE
UNANI"".OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
ROLL CALL lt54
4po
o 00
'12,14541 1;/1
ROLL CALL IPRESE T ABSENT
w w.s.
(U MAYOR GLARKE v/I . I
niv
VICE-MAYOR EIDSON A V
COUNCILMAN HILL ✓ ! 171 / I
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR /{ ✓ V /
COUNCILMAN SHANKS / ' I ✓ 1%
16
COUNCILMAN SIELLSf1ITH ! V
COUNCILMAN DAf1IANO A
TOTAL �f f A
STAFF PRESENT W.S.
CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY . / i
CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly / / .
FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis { V/
/- DIRECTOR OF PLANNING t//f'7J t/
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel i/ • I
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman
CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch ALAIL 0
:; 2-7-
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John cho h /
S ep ✓
.A g/Z.
~ A ,
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
REQUEST TO SPEAK
NAME: DAT ADDRESS: 25-07 l/O dr-
AGENDAe ITEM: / �S ��1j
Ask ;ark
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
"� / REQUEST TO SPEAK
NAME: J-/ /�� 6 c/ (� DATE: 61(/ef7
ADDRESS: �/2 C f G//( C 1/ 0/Y F ' et D( S 7 Cr
AGENDA ITEM:
Asak oft.
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
EQUEST TO SPEAK
NAME• aR„ DATE / /
y
ADDRESS: pL � �'� Z A,
,A.
AGENDA ITEM•
Amok r.
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
REQUEST TO SPEAK
NAME: DATE:
ADDRESS: /Q 9 ZS E. V .,
AGENDA ITEM: _ \ _`1vYwcY►