Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 06.05 City Council Regular Agenda i .... 1PQ p.�1�;CHE ✓G <c t ! 4/ • n Y�;' F {,i44 ,Rt 0 \\s....s.ss_ Ile '�RizoNV P �it o� pac�ie unction CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA JUNE 5 , 1984 7:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (if required) 6:00 P.M. WORK SESSION (if required) CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of May 12, 1984 ... B. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of May 15, 1984 C. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of May 21 , 1984 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED GUESTS AND VISITORS AWARDS , PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 231 , PZ-42-83, Application by Gary Nine to rezone 33. 5 acre parcel, located between Plaza Drive and Idaho Road between Tepee and Greasewood Streets in Section 17, from GR General. Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development . (First Reading) 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 236, PZ-35-83, Application by Howell and Carolyn Anderson to rezone 10 acre parcel, located on west side of North Valley Drive, 300 feet north of Tepee Street in Section 17, from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) (5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 267, PZ-12-84, Commission Initiative to amend Article 33 of Zoning Ordinance, dealing with procedures requirements for Planned Development Zoning. (First Reading) (6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 271 , PZ-13-84, Application by Harvey and Shirley Weeks to rezone 5 acre parcel, located on west side of Colt Road between 2nd and 4th Avenues in Section 21, from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence. (First Reading) (7) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 273, PZ-15-84, Application by Donald and Catherine Cox to rezone 5 acre parcel, located on north side of Superstition Blvd. , between Monterey and Plaza Drives in Section 17, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. (First Reading) OLD BUSINESS (8) ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM AND APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION (Postponed Item) NEW BUSINESS (9) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-23 , APPLICATION FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FUNDS (STATE LOTTERY) (10) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-24, AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS OF LESS THAN $100, 000 (11) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-25 , ESTABLISHING DATE OF STREET IMPROVEMENT BOND SALE (12a) REQUEST FROM DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY - RELEASE FROM 90-DAY NOTICE REQUIREMENT (12b) AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE TO ACQUIRE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY BUILDING (13) APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH RAUSCHER, PIERCE, REFSNES, INC. (Bond Advisors) (14) APPOINTMENT OF CITY MAGISTRATE (15) REAPPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (16) REMOVAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONER AND APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (17) APPROVAL OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PINAL COUNTY AND CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO IDAHO AND IRONWOOD ROADS (18) AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND RECREATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSES APPLICATION BY ADDING BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LANDS TO OPEN SPACE/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM (19) AUTHORIZATION TO BEGIN NEGOTIATIONS FOR LIBRARY ARCHITECT (20) WORK SESSION, JUNE 18, 1984 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, JUNE 19, 1984 CALL TO THE PUBLIC (21) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (22) ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS. " ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • ITEM # MEETING OF (i/e MOTION BY: '1V-'11' V SECONDED BY ; J YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL V I C E_MAY 0 f-E44soN COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓/ COUNCILMAN STEELSLI / _MAYOR_CLARKF ,/ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL / V • • ,fir�a • ITEM NO . 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MAY 12, 1984 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on May 12, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 8:06 a.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Hill, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Councilmen Absent Councilman Taylor, Councilman Steel smith Staff Present: Acting Deputy City Clerk Jackie Liebich City Attorney David Alexander R.-x fL EXECUTIVE SESSION, MAY 12, 1984 ) Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT ( RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, tl ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD ON MAY 12, 1984, AT 8.00 A M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous /\ The motion carried Mayor Clarke recessed the Special Meeting into Executive Session. I Mayor Clarke reconvened the Special Meeting at 2:50 p m ADJOURNMENT Councilman Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 2 50 P.M. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. i Wendell J. Clarke Mayor [- /Ilk, ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk /..\ • SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 12, 1984 PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 15, 1984 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on May 15, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Vice Mayor Eidson led the Invocation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Taylor, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Councilman Absent: Councilman Hill (ill) Staff Present: City Manager Michael J. McNulty Deputy City Clerk Lori V. Clark Controller Keith Lewis Representing Director of Public Safety, Patrol Lieutenant Reed Cox Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa Director of Public Works Rich Broman Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph City Engineer Jim Bakkedahl City Attorney David Alexander Others Present: Mr. Charles Newcomer Mr. Leland Wray 1447 S Starr Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried Amok ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED AFTER REMOVING ITEM "B" AND PLACING IT UNDER "OLD BUSINESS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 252, PZ-1-84, APPLICATION BY KEN BAKKE AND MIKE PURCELL TO REZONE 15 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN MARCOS DRIVE AND 12TH AVENUE IN SECTION 29, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; C: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 263, PZ-10-84, APPLICATION BY DONNA AND ROBERT LOEWENSTEIN TO REZONE 10.8 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROADWAY AND IRONWOOD IN SECTION 20, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), D PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 264, PZ-11-84, APPLICATION BY GUY AND DOROTHY RIDENHOUR TO REZONE 1.25 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF SHIPROCK STREET, 165 FEET EAST OF MAIN DRIVE IN SECTION 18, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); E: ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 23, 1984; F: ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 30, 1984; AND G ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 1, 1984, BE AND HEREBY IS ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous Councilman Steelsmith and Mayor Clarke abstained specifically from Item "A", due to possible conflict of interest. The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 258, PZ-5-84 ICAM PROPERTIES AND CARNEY (Second Reading) Vice Mayor Eidson reiterated the problems discussed at the first reading, and asked if the developer could be required not to build units flush with the property line. City Manager Michael McNulty suggested that possibly the design for building the units could be worked with and some changes made. Vice Mayor Eidson asked if the op- tions were to approve the rezoning for CB-1 or to deny the application. He also asked the applicants could submit a different zoning request. Mr. McNulty replied that the appli- cant could submit a new request, but could not bring back the same request for a year. Vice Mayor Eidson expressed his objection to two-story buildings next to a church. Mr McNulty stated that apartments are considered a buffer area between the commercial areas on the highway and the single family dwelling units, which is what this project would provide. Councilman Shanks agreed that apart- ments are an effective buffer between homes and commercial areas. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 258, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 2 r VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 258, by title only for the second reading Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 258, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 258, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-84 FROM GR GENERAL =yam, RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE• In Favor: Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Mayor Clarke Opposed: Councilman Damiano, Councilman Taylor, Vice Mayor Eidson The motion failed. Introduction of Distinguished Guests and Visitors Mayor Clarke recognized State Representative Roy Hudson. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Clarke presented a Proclamation declaring May 20th through May 26th "Public Works Week", to Director of Public Works Rich Broman. Mr Broman stated that if citizens of the community call in during this week, the Department of Public Works will pick up trash to improve the City. Mayor Clarke asked how much trash was picked up last year. Mr. Broman stated that approximately 70 loads were taken to the dump. Mayor Clarke read a Proclamation declaring May 16, 1984, as "Older American's Day". CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Michael J. McNulty introduced Mr. Charles Newcomer, a former Associate Planner for the City, as the new Director of Planning. Mr. Newcomer expressed his wish to get started in the new position. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 3 /Mk_ /n 1 NEW BUSINESS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-19, DECLARING CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE PROPOSAL AS PUBLIC RECORD ) Mr. Broman stated that this resolution declares the proposal a public record, and the next agenda item offers license to Dowsat of Arizona for the installation of a cable tele- vision system in Apache Junction. Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-19, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE PROPOSAL FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION BY DOWDEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ATLANTA, GEORGIA (JANUARY 3, 1984), WHICH MAY BE REFERRED TO AS THE "CABLE TELEVISION PROPOSAL", BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 281, AMENDING CHAPTER 14, CABLE TELEVISION, OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE (First Reading with the Emergency Clause) ) ) Mr. Broman explained that there were ( minor revisions to the City Code with regard to Cable Television, specifi- 1 cally construction, damages, fees, insurance, etc., and is being presented with the emergency clause. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 281, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 281, by title only with the emergency clause. Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 281, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 14 CABLE TELEVISION, SECTION 14-1-17 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING, 14-1-21 TIMELINESS, 14-1-22 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, 14-1-24 RATES, 14-1-25 LICENSE FEES, 14-1-33 REVERSION, 14-1-46 INSURANCE, AND 14-1-47 PERFORMANCE BOND; AND BY ADDING ARTICLE 14-2 LICENSE GRANTED, SECTIONS 14-2-1 THROUGH 14-2-5, GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE TO CONSTRUCT INSTALL AND OPERATE LINES, WIRES, COAXIAL CABLE AND APPURTENANCES FOR ORIGINATING, RECEIVING, DISTRIBUTING AND SUPPLYING RADIO, TELEVISION AND OTHER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, ALONG, ACROSS AND UPON THE PUBLIC'S REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 4 Ask "Ink 1 STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilman Damian() MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 281, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 14 CABLE TELEVISION, SECTION 14-1-17 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING, 14-1-21 TIMELINESS, 14-1-22 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, 14-1-24 RATES, 14-1-25 LICENSE FEES, 14-1-33 REVERSION, 14-1-46 INSURANCE, AND 14-1-47 PERFORMANCE BOND; AND BY ADDING ARTICLE 14-2 LICENSE GRANTED, SECTIONS 14-2-1 THROUGH 14-2-5, GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE LICENSE TO CONSTRUCT INSTALL AND OPERATE LINES, WIRES, COAXIAL CABLE AND APPURTENANCES FOR ORIGINATING, RECEIVING, DISTRIBUTING AND SUPPLYING RADIO, TELEVISION AND OTHER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, ALONG, ACROSS AND UPON THE PUBLIC'S STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 259, PZ-6-84, AMENDMENT TO LEGAL DESCRIPTION - ?P�r (First Reading as Amended with the Emergency Clause) Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa, explained that due to an error found in the legal description, it is necessary to amend this ordinance. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 259, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 259, by title only with the emergency clause. Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 259, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 259, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-84 FROM GR GENERAL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 5 A RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED, AND THAT ORDINANCE NO. 259, BE APPROVED AS AMENDED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-6, AB-84-4 CASPER, WRAY ) ) City Engineer Jim Bakkedahl, briefed the Council on the request for abandonment of East 15th Avenue between Starr Road and South Vaquero Road, and stated that the Development Coordinating Committee has no objection. Councilman Damiano asked if 15th Avenue is an existing road. Mr Bakkedahl stated that it exists only as an easement Mr. Leland Wray, 1447 S. Starr, Apache Junction, requested approval of the abandonment request. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-6, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON EAST 15TH AVENUE BETWEEN SOUTH STARR ROAD AND SOUTH VAQUERO ROAD, AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ( ABANDONMENT CASE AB-84-4, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION FOR LOT CLEAN-UP) Mr. McNulty explained that three property owners have requested extensions to clean their property, which is required of them in order to comply with Article 9-2 of the City Code. Councilman Shanks stated that as it appears that these property owners are attempting to comply, they should be given some consideration. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BE GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO BRING THEIR PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 9-2 OF THE CITY CODE. MARTIN BRAFFET AND CECELIA BERYL, 30 DAY EXTENSION TO EXPIRE JUNE 14, 1984 KENNETH MUDGE, 30 DAY EXTENSION TO EXPIRE JUNE 14, 1984 ROBERT COOK, 45 DAY EXTENSION TO EXPIRE JUNE 29, 1984. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 6 Amia. rms. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING, MAY 21, 1984 WORK SESSION, MAY 29, 1984 WORK SESSION, JUNE 4, 1984 „oak, EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION JUNE 5, 1984 Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: (a) A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON MAY 21, 1984, AT 7.00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR THE CANVASS OF VOTES; (b) A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MAY 29, 1984, IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING, AT 7 00 P M , FOR A BUDGET WORKSHOP; (c) A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON JUNE 4, 1984, AT 7.00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, AND (d) THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON JUNE 5, 1984, AT 6:00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE FIVE VEHICLES FOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ) ) Mr. McNulty stated that the funds are available to replace five very high-mileage vehicles. _ Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO PURCHASE FIVE (5) VEHICLES FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,650 00 (EACH) PLUS APPLICABLE SALES TAX. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Councilman Shanks reported that the Apache Junction Fire District will be conducting an election on June 19, 1984, for a bond issue. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL None. ADJOURNMENT Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 7:44 P.M. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 1984 _. PAGE 7 AOIlik A.D., VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF—T711 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. „..` ,,. , '. , r Wendell J. Clarke • Mayor ATTEST • Kathleen Connelly - - . [ City Clerk /'\ I REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 1984 PAGE 8 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MAY 21, 1984 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on May 21, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7 02 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Hill, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Councilman Absent: Councilman Taylor Staff Present City Manager Michael J. McNulty Deputy City Clerk Lori V. Clark `-°•` `ARE �^ :, PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-21, CONDUCTING AND ACCEPTING THE OFFICIAL CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE CITY SPECIAL ELECTION HELD ON MAY 15, 1984 Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT • ( RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, l ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-21, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, CONDUCTING AND ACCEPTING THE OFFICIAL CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE CITY SPECIAL ELECTION HELD MAY 15, 1984, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-22, DECLARING SPECIAL BOND ELECTION RESULTS AND ADOPTING CERTIFICATE ) Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-22, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF AND ADOPTING A CERTIFICATE OF RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION HELD ON MAY 15, 1984, AND ORDERING THE RECORDING OF SUCH CERTIFICATE, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. CERTIFICATES OF RESULTS OF ELECTION ) Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE "CERTIFICATE OF RESULTS OF ELECTION" BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. 1 Attorney Dick Mitchell, representing the City bond issue, introduced Mr. Gerry Miller, representing the investment banking firm of Rauscher, • Pierce and Refsnes. Mr. Gerry Miller addressed the Council on the procedures and time limits for the bond sales. Mayor Clarke asked if there was a tentative schedule for the sale of • the bonds. City Manager Michael McNulty stated that it is necessary to budget the funds prior to sale, and it will be the end of July. EXECUTIVE SESSION, MAY 21, 1984 ) j ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT �_ RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, '�"``40hf4 `M` :_i ''ix '" ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD ON MAY 21, 1984, AT 7 30 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. { Councilman Shanks seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke recessed the Special Meeting at 7 15 p.m. Mayor Clarke convened into Executive Session at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Clarke reconvened the Special Meeting at 8:40 p.m., and recessed the meeting and the Executive Session until May 22, 1984, at 7 00 p.m. Mayor Clarke reconvened the Special Meeting on May 22, 1984, at 7:00 p.m., and recessed into Executive Session. Mayor Clarke reconvened the Special Meeting. There being no further business to discuss, Mayor Clarke adjourned the Special Meeting. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCTLUF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. Wendell J. Clarke Mayor SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 21, 1984 PAGE 2 elIN ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly * !-,* ▪ - + City Clerk • i [_ [ ' SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 21, 1984 PAGE 3 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES o9 ,- # ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: J ) V lid YES NO ABSTAINED cnuN C T I MAN / A4f-1IAN0 COUNCILMAN HILL _ V ! `/,A COLINC I_Lekt TAYLOR 161 5/7/;/ 1OUNC I LEI ,.S HUNKS OUNC I LMAN STFFI SMM1I TH J . MAYOR CLARKE V UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 12 , 1984 ; B : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 15 , 1984 ; AND C : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 21 , 1984 , BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 231 PZ-42-23 THE APPLICANT IS NTNF 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION , 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED k Ix? ACHEJo • -� O U RI i. Z q,p�ZONP 'Dit� o� (Apache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 9, 1984 MEMORANDU 0• THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: - ;'', MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ 1 \ ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: ,k\\) JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-42-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 231 ) JUNE 5, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING JUNE 19, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-42-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 231 , is a request by the applicant Gary Nine representing several property owners to rezone their property from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development. The applicant is proposing a 400-lot travel trailer resort. The site is a vacant 33.5 acre parcel located between Plaza Drive and Idaho Road between Tepee and Greasewood Streets in Section 17. It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include houses, mobile homes, a mobile home park, and vacant land. Other Information and Application Requirements Number of Property Owners 19 Number of Exempt Properties 1 Number of Affected Owners 18 Number of Signatures 13.5=75% Approver for Agenda Signatures by Affected Area 75% &LL te Item # Frst Second RLaing .'PubIIC Hearing Old Business New Business ...._Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-42-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 231 ) May 9, 1984 Page Two Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments The proposed density would be 23.9 persons per acre which would comply with the General Plan. The companion preliminary plat (SD-11-83) may be approved by the Subdivision Committee pending the assured water supply designation of the water company. If a decision is made to recommend approval of the proposal , the Commission must find that this Planned Development complies with all six criteria set forth in Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. Final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways. The perimeter wall shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department so as to provide variety by recessing the wall at various intervals, varying the height, incorporating landscaping, or some similar means. Satisfaction of the City Engineer's and Building Official ' s requirements will be necessary in order to get final PD approval . Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of May 8, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Polomskey/Sansoni 4-1-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-42-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 231 , application of Gary Nine representing several property owners for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . Final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways. 2. The perimeter wall shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department so as to provide variety by recessing the wall at various intervals, varying the height, incorporating landscaping, or some similar means. 3. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer, Building Official , and Fire Department. 4. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-42-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 231 ) May 9, 1984 Page Three 5. The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned ,.. Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It complies with Section 33.09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the highest and best use of the land. 3. It complies with the General Plan's high density designation." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 231 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-42-83 , application of Gary Nine representing several property owners ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 231 , • AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-42-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. 1. Final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City fn obtain dedicated roadways 2. The perimeter wall shall he designed to the satisfaction of the planting Department so as to provide variety by recessing the wall at varionc intervals, varying the height. incorporating landscaping, nr some similar means 3 The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Fngineer, Riiilding Official, and Fire Department. 4 Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide, 5. The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) Amik ORDINANCE NO 231 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-42-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL 1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as A portion of the East 1 of the Southeast ; of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows Commencing at the east quarter corner of said Section 17, thence south (assumed), 329 97 feet along the east line of said Section 17, also being the centerline of Idaho Road to the true point of beginning, thence continuing along said east section line and centerline south, 890.91 feet, thence North 89° 50' 00" West, 660 27 feet, thence South 00° 00' 15" East, 99.00 feet, thence 89° 50' 00" East, 660 26 feet, thence South 329 97 feet along said east section line and centerline of Idaho Road; thence North 89° 50' 00" West, 1320.47 feet, thence North 00° 00' 31" West, 659 94 feet along the centerline of North Plaza Drive, thence South 89° 50' 00" East, 660 28 feet; thence North 00° 00' 15" West, 660.04 feet, thence North 89° 49' 30" West, 660.33 feet, thence North 00° 00' 31" West, 329 98 feet along the centerline of North Plaza Drive, thence South 89° 49' 58" East, 660 36 feet along the centerline of West Tepee Street; thence South 00° 00' 15" East, 329 98 feet, thence South 89° 49' 30" East, 660 34 feet to the true point of beginning and containing 33.51 acres, gross; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification /1%, from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development. 2. The approval of the zoning district classification incorporates, by reference, the preliminary approval of the Planned Development, including all materials and documents as submitted by the applicant, and the development of said property shall be in accordance with said Planned Development application conditions, provisions, and stipulations, and as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance. The application includes the "Street Light Agreement," and if executed as part of this application, the "Agreement for Maintenance of Landscaping Within City Rights-of-Way " 3. Applicant shall install, at his own expense, fire hydrants as per approved plans of the Apache Junction Fire District for this Planned Development. 4 Applicant shall install, at his own expense, off-site street improvements as set forth on the Planned Development plans in compliance with design details approved by the Director of Public Works SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. ORDINANCE NO. 231 PAGE TWO OF TWO SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dvi ea City Attorney i PZ-42-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 231) PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WLST SMOKL,wEF V- w 0 SCHOOL WESI 'EPEE S I REET 1771 SH1JRULK STREET ------ Y TH STATE r I LAND ` E T ROUNDUP SIREET J � C3- Z 1;k F,1 Sf•Wf][ll) SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1"=400' r-I I LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GR GENERAL RURAL) L _� '11 , . -:.--.: ";---- • i. . ... --... '"-t"-'..7t-..."`---,"---- ••--,•-... ...;,.--r.41-11.1f,lef `7.-:t.,--...-It:-.="4---"GE;.`ft- e----••••.?-. :_be..7..--,i-----,-. . - . -;""-• - . --: - ,- _:.!------- ..,,,,....---...:,- PZ-42-z, * '--::-'--,:yer---• - - - .-- --- (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NG. ZY1X - _ 7-:,----...- ,-• . _- -:-.. -- ' - --,. ... .. - --,--.`,_ PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RCRAL TG TWPD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT •:,--,.*.. . -,...:-.„...::. ..,.*-.. .-______,..--:,.:_:-....,-..„ ,-,...-f,, III zeAs77N4 A0440.5 x..,...f.t:?-f'..f:::t:•.-7;:.. , . .,...,_-•:.- -...*:.7.';;;:',...... .Z:4, .. i'',"•,"It.,".a..'", .,... ,nt.,-,..-.-•`..:1,.,-.4.-.1.tr,e-' .',...:''..,,,•.::::;:.5-s-:z;:f_..tt.s.'•-,--7 . 7 '-'..-'-;"-'-`,:,.::.::".:1" '''-''''.."'"-..`:-;,:s.'-....T.,.::.,:,7";C:_a.!`,.:,=•`'.•:.,...:,....,_7,.;.. ...- 4,......; 7...."..,"•..-1/.47-,..=•••5:-.6.,----.:-.,-7,...--..,:l,'..,.:V., ..."1: .--,-,..,:,..:-,-..::•..-‘,..:-.44.7.•:•-•'-..:••::::".,.1.-='",z '''...4 ..'Tft;41 :11-`,7- 'Pr,Q. ----..--,`c.----•.----.0,--,-,------ --,.-.;--!.,------7f ; Q. -----.,-,:...:,.....5,-,;^.'..",_-•....,;;.;-‘,.:F.i.:...,'S.i'.,-,,----,F 14.1 -,••-- %.:,1-:.,..A4...,..:"..-,--•,'..,-.,:::...'Zi..7S-- 17 t 4,'""— .,';.,.....",',"--i.'-•:".. ..:. .....t.,•---Z.",i--....:V...,,,,-1,,,,,,?,..t.- .__. 7' ,:."::-.4.7.,";W::,,...'-.-,`......::.,;---t--7:'",--....----::4•.---...00- ...-7,.:- -.-,-,.."-7-_t-a.--._ 2.,.....?'--'.:.-''.5--'-•:.:t- r'-ir'S-r-----Z.'%-ta"==*4- ''.. ---,.....i....a........r...,..r.....-c"....;..--f-,,Z-7.:.,,,,--,--.-..-.,:t G , SCHOOL ---,.:::::-..;.2:.- --,_4_,,,../.......-r-,..- •---- - -•-•-vys---------.:.:,-;?.. ...,-- - -,.....--.....;„7„..-.4.-..i.....,,a*d...:„.--_-_._,.-4- „,_,.....,,,. •.§..'• *I ,.--:--r: •----.--,.,-,:z.E.1,-.....--L4A.-a.2-:.-.c.--:.-„__-_,..---,_:._-,.. ._-.a: ...-- -.. -.::-.,-,•>‘--,:.---.- -------,f---4.,-,..-.--,,c,,, ----',-.-.,-.-.... ...-. •- ...--,,,,,---•:-,-...,,,,...-.,..,...,.,: _ ,7_-,.--„...........„,-, ,.. -:_---,,-.---,..,1,-.......,----- -,--,...-.::.,. ,-41.,..,z4..... v... -- .,,.--_-:...-----_,-,-.- :.- --..---......-7-..7.7.-:,=-_ ..-..,....:•;.,-,...;,-.---4,...,,,..,. --.7'.-=,-',s"::-,:--t,,--::-,c.-...:..„. ---;.-,-"%,,-.7.:.:-.71;-:,------...4.,-..--7:-..-y-te-.1,• -t.--:- 111.' -'1' -=-.C. !.',....-:_,"' ....:-'1-•:.-•:-7::.,•,-,.."-:-..:7Z.* 4 . . .._..,.....„,.:._.. „.:„...:,_:...,...,...,;_...rr,:.:7:.,.....7......:::.7.,,... I . 7--... ::',",."?,::i.-, .--, .,---.:-..;,..,_,.......,-,,,AF.-±4,5.k...--.,:-• , ,OF , t, ---m ,=_.....„...,,,,..._.. 7.21.mr.. 44,1....t... .w, ...,..,......_.,.„:„.:„.1.....„.... ....,.._,„ 0. __ ;, ..,,..;___.,...A -."'-'..-.,,,,••-•..---..!...74,-. ''. • .;.:-,.:,-,-,.7-.,--.;...k.,•?!...ttf.:Q.-yetcrns.---,=:,:t7,- ,....r.% , . .-.-1.-,,,,,---.-- '7-•...-.Z.;'sr:--.,TY:',-r.,..,''....-,...1%-f..,-7-..-....,-..---.: ..".'-1'..,---f,-.1-.-4‘-:::?.=:-." - "7'', ::.'-:'...'.:::'':•,',,c.:Z.;..'" ...-' . I • '1 ' ri-'.1 _LI ,_-• ---,----.*--11`':--I-7-•,---''-----,-=------- ----,..-..-;-.--,-:.:;-_,7:.-.- 1 • ' I STATE - TH Af LAND , . '— -.,,,,-----7;_.: -- r, --.---•--.2.--vr;••••,:?.:n.141.fi.." , ..-•7. :-,,,z„.:-_,,,_--,.:••,--.•,..:,„..±..:.- -..-,,-...•••,.....----,,, g : 4_ 7.-..:.:••••-•.-7-:..7....:::::-..,:;,,-.---•.:-..7---,>.--- -e.::::"74--%"sir-s•t! ...f,r---.1.•:::-..z..,-.1:1-..:•.•,----,:.;---..--rro,-`4...-..-:-.,--,,;;,-.;:y-,.1* = t-- .. ///f 3-''-r',''z'r-•:17='-',!- ----eckr•7-chf,:t.; _-_-_::-::.-.--,.'..,t4 X ..'. '.-.4.--•;,;.-..:;:";..-:";-4:.-,"4-...7.4.3-7;•;....-..:•-•-:".--.f*:.7k>,----"......--,...---"--1.:,-.% '-'..WEST ROUNDUP S(REIT' :' .;.-",,,..i-;.,:!-4-7;f---',---....'-:',....---•-••••'-f- -W`,4''tzt?-:,,!er.:-ItPF , ,......„....„,-,--.1-.--,,..-4-.7 ,- ,...:,,..t.?.•.-..-::......,- 7 / - '....;.,,,g,,-!--"•:.:-:......_±,4,,e,-..-.,- -. ' --''''''',"`'''-`-'2'2" f.., -::7--,.t.''';;=•14--...".:.1 '.<';',:.1...r..i.",Fr.,.2.•-•,.;;;;.±,17S-.47..,11 ?.,. ' .-':;r4•:.; ';',...1Pi*"..";:e:%":''' ''<.:C.-1.4 ,71-"4-..W.A.I'''.....-.."'"'tC':4"..,11.1-ri.e.'4*.."1,W1., 2!..,T•.144..,. ;.%;...4..i:.:.,;;,-,..,"•'..,:;-‘2,":e-;..--.=-,.....:.t:.:.,?e";-.44:;.`.?r- - -""•'-.;•-.!:::,:Z^,:',',.--tt;;C-;.4.;-''.7:::"...,`....„.-',...,.-. ;.;',..r...-::::', :...[ .„.....--:‘-',..',,..--'''...,elv't'''':•;...401.7-'.a.'''''''''-- - it .t. ...'. ..: il . -.. -...V.cle,.,T_--.3.pc..--,a--3,-,zi...-.,:.z."--,...,!.-.0.---.3...-,e„.-;,:-..,-:-.:47•:7,, . - • -,----,-;-,--,',(7 ....t-,•;---,-,e.;:•;.',-"-"•0-7.1.-i".'s!r-'4`.:--%•!f::4r,,.:'; . S. Tr'-"-2::,',...;';:-•,"%:;.'„:„.,"•,.'::"f"',,.' --,.." - ! - ,,, - ..., ...,.- .:.:.....r...;;:.....,....e.4.1.1N----,-;,---. .,--,.!"•?,-, - n SUBJECT SITE : - -----.:::..--,---.•:_,_.,:_‘-_,.......,-.7-.,-..=:::::::„. ,.,,,......-___::, fi-•-d ..,,. .,.----_,:,...;...... "-!r;:...- SCALE: 1"=400' 1 7-•--.''' '',;.•-tnr",ct...'i•?-1"7"-'-;-"----.77-0.''''.:':-,-".:'.',.-,,,....'''''1.s"-5 ".' : '-" ....-.." '''...-.7 :-....:- .;.'-'...9'..;"7 ...--2:-..-.4. . '',...., ''. '0'7.: N ili ' 1 LIMI-15 OF' ZONING (REKAINDER fg GR GENERAL RURAL) L-_-.J- ..... - - ._ - -_,.-..:_,-__-.:j,.. -..,.... ....,..,... .47,....-.. ,;..,... .:-....::.-...,.--.-'-•-....--....0-=7.!-:::-_,;....--'..r.-.-.,-.-.7F-,..-kzi- -f.,;-. 4;1,7 ,-.7_ .:‘......:t....;`•-•:ii'.---_-;;,..\-: , :. ' - ...'' '!--, -- .-•.--,4-:-..!-13.•..,, , '-----,- __., ..-1-11. ''''''''-';-<°''''t-4-4:".*. •-tit' -.6-....-4.-....- ••-.,„. •••,----g.---•••••,%. s-:,-,--•••• 3"-:-...:".------.7-- A. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF .S MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH •-• COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANMUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • _ • • ITEM NO . 3 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 231 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO , 236 PZ-35-83 , THE APPLICANT IS ANDERSON 2, WOULD E PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION , 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN ' S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED �' ..A IU pi q,piZ NP SOZly 4 ache c&unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 9, 1984 Approver for Agenda /4i I"\ DM Its First Reading t5kr/W MEMORANDUM • THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Feac'ireJ______ _ ✓Public Hearing THROUGH: i/ /MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ old Business ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR New Business —Consent Agenda FROM: A . JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER W . SUBJEC . REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-35-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 236) JUNE 5, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING JUNE 19, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description ' Rezoning case No. PZ-35-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 236, is a request by the applicants Howell and Carolyn Anderson to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a vacant 10-acre parcel located on the west side of North Valley Drive, 300 feet north of Tepee Street in Section 17. It is designated Medium Density on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, houses, and mobile homes. Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) Comments Potentially, the rezoning would allow 87 persons per acre which would not comply with the General Plan. The DCC does recommend stipulating the dedication of the east thirty-three feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and that Planned Development zoning be applied in this case in order to control the density. The applicants felt that Planned Development zoning would not be financially possible at this time. There are valid protests on file with the Filkeys, the Tandys, the Smiths, and the Carters objecting to this rezoning. In order for this rezoning to be adopted, the City Council must approve it by a 3/4' s vote. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-35-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 236) May 9, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of May 8, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (MIS Taylor/Conway 5-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-35-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 236, application of Howell and Carolyn Anderson for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application. The reason for this recommendation is: This rezoning would be in excess of the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction's policy to recommend approval of such rezonings." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas I\ ./\ RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 236 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-35-83 , application of Howell and Carolyn Anderson ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 236 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-35-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL 1. The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes - 2 That a Planned Development zoning designation be applied in this case ` BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a. "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) .-t ORDINANCE NO 236 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-35-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE "or, JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as Parcel No 1 The North z of the Southeast ; of the Southwest A of the Northwest a of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and Parcel No 2 The South - of the Northeast ; of the Southwest a of the Northwest ; of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the east thirty-three (33') feet of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM v1� c C' D v 'A"lexande� City Attorney PZ-35-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 236) PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) wL_ r1-UU1H1 L51Krtl - - I r 1 TH/PD - -1 WEST SMOKETREE STREET t . 1 TH WEST TEPEE STREET Q TH 1 } cc w = Q _ICD-IL, "gm > cc CD ISO- z wt5 i 5H 11'KUGK S I KLt1 RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINES SUBJECT SITE N LJ LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL) SCALE. 1" = 300' * z , . PZ-35-83 (PRCIPCISED ORDINANCE NO. 236) RLLUN;LMG Fly GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HemEs I1iE ZIINE C174I ,.-, • T" �R ff E r/.sTlovel R44OS ` WES i FOUT}i1LL 5 t Ktf 1+� 1 - , F '-;..„ ". - .. -2,' -..-':. "..,' ..,:..:"..'-!..-';':Zt.t. il 1 TH PD �j�; � EST SMOKETREE SIRE ; TH / i .7;....iit I. ,.< tyros. T ¢. 'a �'dP' _ .-'� v._s ..r A� .wk s.. w tt Y P..� 4 _ •x- �-T.,, if +` � yRmc 1,�n,t , . t ,_,�{ Yam} ` ..w�;f J,.1,� , 4Y:rie L4�;_F� rypxrim;.S _ qy III d ., VX... �f ,,rTCsa t . } f I :Ye'ti. 11 4 5+4 .� 1frr"- Aga! • 1' �•�� • �� rF f RIGHT—OF—WAY/PROPERTY LINES— y } SUBJECTEa SITE— a _ C_. N • L,t— LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER-GR-GENERAL-RURAL) ..iSCALE-1- 1 -300'' n a- ' sr gam'- --:.. �" =.0 ,...... ....... ,.3// 4 /*-5e . . ) . ; . . .. . .. s 6P2 - 3 5-— 8 3 _ . .. . - - -- -•. - • & k 714141c4L, % CIAet?e */44(1142)Pag,1 as4 _ - _ - 6? DEPT. CFNNING DEVELOPMENT , - ,011116, 3r...e...) fit„7 , cwxaz.vei65.67.4,4efialer, . 1-eirtz„ 1?-0-01.- _....e:ezrite/tai (lielzt.im-1 .,_ . , • . . _.d . --e-faerel .. --<__.,u--/-erd,e, zt.ediz-,:_e' _ 74_ (z/-ceizeJz-- . . - - . - ) - - --- ..__ 1.7._ ..- -... _, . . ',: :,•7.:.. • ;'-'.: '17.. State of Arizona - - ,-.'-• .-' - County of Maricopa .• --,,,,-..,-.-.,....--- • ...,,--,-- „..., (.21: i,4 , ,. This instrument was signed before mect.jiies 'i\4"dy,sof t• _— _ March, 1984 by Everett and Ann Filkey, pe:rsonally known to me. ) . . - , ,,• : ,z„,i , - - - • .:•-•,.:-'-..,.---,- ;,,. l r. 7---x----=-- --e- -1.-----4, . L861•qz Ae$ send9 uNssotplopahv 4—_fflalthLON el or: TeuTd _ ' . W-22-7- 6T '6T—IPW 0eeSS /../ Zr /az-4—r ( 7 .5 eV—, '---".•" ' ---)--a---"9 r-,7 y_s-tv . , ,. • , 2..... ..7...-_-.--.2___ -- -- --' '172.4frer/TPlIi1111110‘ ' '7.-P-27.' CY t--) /7. -- ---e2 G'-7-- orr-- -7--- I- --7-1- ?-p'- ,g...-p-y.2.- Ci ha 7--%._2 . r ‘,1 . . . _.. . ,... c;?,- )4,72/---,----‘, . 3 E 7.4) 2L (?--- ----- 7--,---,2-2,-,--v- -- ...-.,._:,. / ---277--- _.. . . . . ._ . - - - - - /-7-7. -- (---,--7-74--- . - 7,--4) .4—V _1(/ . „ /iv2 --e-- 7 72--z7 7 -? ?2 r --'2-7--t- -- 7- --p- 2,-2.--c--z, /-2717'?--.2 - - e.,C.,"2-, 27p. ..g ---2, -6----", . • /--,,---,-,-- .--2 ,--- ,..--.-- ,----e-e_,--,--e -e.2 ,-- 7?, 177-7/ , ,.. - -.,-. -/7----,----,--,---,,,.2y--.. -4--c---2,--72 ., .---7,07 - --, ( /-2.-c.---2---- --k7,---eg2, r."-Y3.-----p P---:.72.---6---- . . . . ›oco ge---s2T2 ,,,,---,,y_., -r-f----,----77,_ i)--, ---,1,-, --,,-(7-r ri 0 33 r) - z rri z 4,n i ...,0 ,...... 1320 West Tepee Apache Junction, AZ 85220 March 19 , 1984 „ . Jim Nakagawa Planning and Zoning Commission 'Ic42J City ofApache Junction .+� Apache Junction, AZ 85220 �� `,k`-,� �' pip(. Ref : PZ-35-83 ( Proposed Ordinance No. 236 ) Dear Mr. Nakagawa and members of the P & Z Commission Per your recent correspondence we were made aware of the request by Howell and Carolyn Anderson to rezone their property from General Rural to Trailer Homesite. We would like to submit our protest to the rezoning of this property for the following reasons : They now presently have a trailer park which is located adjacent to the acreage they are now trying to rezone. The present trailer park does not appear to come up to city re- , quirements. It is very dirty, very unsightly, the opaque fence consists of a cyclone fence with a few shrubs and lots of weeds. There is no fence on the east side, thus allowing their dogs to roam freely. Trash is allowed to pile up be- side their trash containers and eventually blows over onto the joining properties . There are junk cars and other debris on the property. The streets are unpaved within the park caus- ing an excessive amount of dust especially since there appears to be no enforcement of a speed zone within the park or on the property which they wish to have rezoned. (They are now using the property which they wish to rezone as an entrance and exit into the existing park. ) We are not protesting the property being developed into a NICE park which would be an asset to the other parcels which join it, but we are protesting the development of another park like the one that already exists . We feel that the present park should be brought up to "standards" before they are permitted to expand into another one. -2- Ref : PZ-35-83 (Proposed Ordinance No . 236 We would certainly appreciate your consideration of this protest before a decision is made. Sincerely, it , J immy Carter ✓/ J fl (Joan E . Carte/ --/-7/ / :N.-- - — r�;y Comr,ss»n//Expires,4!,'7, ;gab r ^. it ctcMr ,L�, ,�9 & . Mrs. Jackt� Tandy _ Apache P�n6002316 AZ 85220 ., .. „crjtz,_...: 't.,,,t5j.. c c \gz,4 • ;,_ , 0.--" ,, _00„.............;_Lig _ ii2 ,. ._.r..,0_1.-,4,e,—,Lf •- - z ; x,,., OFFICIAL SEAL - JAMES D. FICKAS . _ _ �' is;,4 -T'y` ,t:•xar S.�.`t,-.€- ,s NOTARY PUBLIC-ARIZONA _ . „%" MARICOPA COUNTY ! i, - - -My Commiss:on Expires Apr 24,1987 — ._ .---. li'— — -- /7 L • • ITEM NO . 4 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 236 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 267 PZ-12-814 , COMMISSION INITIATIVE 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , "o . Auk PQACHE✓ el Or-----71/0 -- .. ---:..Y gR/ZUNp, • `0Dity 4 Apache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 9, 1984 v,. Approver for Agenda �`'t° AdMik Date Item # First Reading c., j � MEMORANDUM ( , THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reeding Public Hearing THROUGH: ' )MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ Old Business I ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR New Business FROM: W JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Consent Agenda ot t-k SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM 0 PZ-12-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 267) JUNE 5, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING ynyt- JUNE 19, 1984- SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description This is a Commission-initiated amendment to Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance dealing with the procedures and requirements for Planned Development Zoning. The proposed amendment includes: the separation of the base zoning amendment procedure from the site plan approval procedure; allowing pre-application or pre-preliminary conferences to be optional rather than mandatory; modifying or eliminating the final development plan requirement; increasing the minimum open space requirement from 10% to 20%; eliminating the density bonus provision, eliminating the height increase provision; and modifying the site plan information requirements. The complete text of the proposed amendment is attached as Ordinance No. 267. Staff Comments The proposed ordinance amending Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance seeks to streamline the Planned Development process. The proposal was developed by the Development Coordinating Committee as a more refined version of the ordinance drafted by the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee. Many developers purchase their land contingent upon zoning approval . The current PD rezoning process requires the preparation of some elaborate drawings in order to obtain approval of the rezoning. In response to developer's complaints that this process is too expensive and time-consuming, the DCC proposes the separation of the 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-12-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 267 May 9, 1984 Page Two rezoning process from the site plan approval process. Much of the information required for the site plan approval has been either combined during the preliminary stage or deferred to the final stage. The open space requirement was increased because it was felt that 10% was too low of a standard. The requirement for City Council approval of the final PD plan was discussed. It was planning staff' s belief that if the final PD plan did not differ significantly from the preliminary PD plan as previously approved by the Council , then final PD approval by the Council did not appear necessary. However, in order to take care of any possible changes in the final plan, street improvement plans, or building plans, the DCC recommends that the final plan provision be retained. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of April 10, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Sansoni/Polomskey 5-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Ordinance No. 267, 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING 'THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II , LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1 , ZONING ORDINANCE, ' BY AMENDING 'ARTICLE XXXIII, SECTION 33.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT' ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, ' be recommended to the Apache Junction City Council for approval with the following amendments: 1 . Section 33.04 (2c) to read as follows: "Preliminary architectural elevations and/or perspectives necessary to demonstrate the design and character of the proposed development." 2. Section 33.04 (2c) - "Other relevant data. . . " be listed as item (2d). 3. Section 33.06 (2c) to read as follows: "Buildings, walls, and trailer units shall be located in such a manner so as to avoid a corridor, tunnel , linear, or barracks-like effect." The Honorable Nayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-12-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 267 May 9, 1984 Page Three 4. Section 33.06 (2c) and (2d) become (2d) and (2e) . 5. Section 33.03 (3d) should read: "Approval shall be valid for one year or for the period given in the approved schedule of development " eliminating the first sentence." Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Ordinance No. 267, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING 'THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II , LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1 , ZONING ORDINANCE, ' BY AMENDING 'ARTICLE XXXIII , SECTION 33.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT' ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY," be and hereby is (approved) (denied). JAN:mas ,— /6\ f ORDINANCE NO 267 ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY IF APACHE JUNCTION, , ARIZONA, AMENDING "THE CODE OF THE CITY IF APACHE JUNCTION, AR ONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1 ZONING ORDINANCE," BY ' ENDING "ARTICLE XXXIII, SECTION 33 00 PLANNED EVELOPMENT ZONING DIST' CT", REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, P'OVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND D LARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT OR►,INED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AT• • 1.,... SECTION I GENERAL ^ - "The Code of t e City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Volume II, Land : Development Cod- Chapter 1, Zoning Ordi ance," shall be amended by amending "Articl- XXXIII, Section 33 00 Planned Development Zoning . District" to read :s follows ARTIC 33 SECTION 33 00 ', 'NNED DEV OPMENT ZONING DISTRICT SECTION 33 01 INTEN ION AND PURPOSE SECTION 33 02 PERMIT USES SECTION 33.03 PROCEDU SECTION 33 04 DOCUME •TION CONTENT REQUIRED SECTION 33 05 STAGI a (' SERVED) SECTION 33.06 DEVE •PMEN STANDARDS SECTION 33 07 DEDI ATION ' D MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES SECTION 33 08 MIX D LAND U S (RESERVED) SECTION 33.09 GE _RAL CRITE' A SECTION 33.10 CI VERSIONS OF 'RE-EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS TO 'LANNED DEVELOPMENTS 11 SECTION 33 11 '.UPPLEMENTARY PRO ISIONS - SECTION 33 01 I, ENTION AND PURPOSE In certain i -tances the objectives of t'e Zoning Ordinance may be best achieved b the promotion of planned de elopments which do = not conform in all respects to the land use patterns and regulations A of convention. zoning It is the intention ald purpose of the Planned r Development .ning District (PD) to provide fo greater flexibility, and thereby ncourage more creative design whic may include a combina- tion of dif'erent dwelling types and/or a variet of land uses which complement each other and which are compatible wi. existing and proposed land uses n the vicinity Therefore, it is inten•-d to enable the use and i tegration of contemporary land planning p inciples in such a manner as to promote its most appropriate use, to . low diversification in the ,elationship of various uses, structures, and 'aces, to facilitate the ad:•uate and economical provisions of streets and tilities, to preser e the natural green spaces, to counteract the of cts of urban congention and monotony while providing the environmenta amenities, and • ovide the unified control of development of land. t is further the intent to insure substantial complianc- with r the General Plan adopted by the City now or in the future an. spirit (` of intent of the Zoning Ordinance in requiring adequate stand. ds 11 n:cessary to promote the public health, safety, and general we fare thout unduly inhibiting the advantages of modern planning as . means .f effectuating desirable development, redevelopment, rehabilita ion, and conservation in the City of Apache Junction for residential, commercial, industrial, and other purposes. ORDINANCE NO 267 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING "THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE," BY AMENDING "ARTICLE XXXIII, SECTION 33.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT", REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL "The Code of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Volume II, Land Develop- ment Code, Chapter 1, Zoning Ordinance," shall be amended by amending "Article XXXIII, Section 33.00 Planned Development Zoning District" to read as follows- y ARTICLE 33 SECTION 33.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT • SECTION 33 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE SECTION 33.02 PERMITTED USES SECTION 33.03 PROCEDURE SECTION 33 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED SECTION 33.05 STAGING (RESERVED) SECTION 33 06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -•. _ = SECTION 33 07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES SECTION 33.08 MIXED LAND USES (RESERVED) SECTION 33.09 GENERAL CRITERIA SECTION 33 10 CONVERSIONS OF PRE-EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS SECTION 33 11 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS SECTION 33.01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE In certain instances the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance may be _ _ best achieved by the promotion of planned developments which do not conform in all respects to the land use patterns and regulations of conventional zoning It is the intention and purpose of the Planned Development Zoning District (PD) to provide for greater flexibility, and thereby encourage more creative design which may include a combina- tion of different dwelling types and/or a variety of land uses which complement each other and which are compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity. Therefore, it is intended to enable the use and integration of contemporary land planning principles in such a manner as to promote its most appropriate uses, to allow diversification in the relationship of various uses, structures, and spaces, to facilitate the adequate and economical provisions of streets and utilities; to preserve the natural green spaces, to counteract the effects of urban congestion and monotony while providing the environmental amenities, and provide the unified control of development of land. It is further the intent to insure substantial compliance with the General Plan adopted by the City now or in the future and spirit of intent of the Zoning Ordinance in requiring adequate standards necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare without unduly inhibiting the advantages of modern planning as a means of effectuating desirable development, redevelopment, rehabilitation, and conservation in the City of Apache Junction for residential, commercial, industrial, and other purposes Adak ORDINANCE NO 267 PAGE TWO OF NINE SECTION 33 02 PERMITTED USES 1 The buildings and uses permitted in the Planned Development Zoning District shall be governed by the permitted uses in the base district or in a combination of base districts The base district or districts from which permitted uses shall be determined shall include only those designated in the application and approved by the City Council 2. Upon the approval of the City Council, the arrangement of uses on the land as permitted by the base district(s) and the proportions of permitted land use defined by the underlying base district(s) may be adjusted, rearranged, or altered according to the standards and regulations as provided in this Article 3 Any use applied for and not specifically listed in this Zoning Ordinance, if approved by the City Council, shall be designated to the base district for which the use, when applied, would most resemble 4. By "base district" this Article means any conventional zoning district(s) as approved by the City Council for a particular area Normally, the base district(s) will be those existing or compatible with existing conventional zoning districts in the subject area SECTION 33 03 PROCEDURE The development plan review shall be conducted according to the following steps, procedures, and requirements notwithstanding any other provisions of this Zoning Ordinance There shall be a three (3) step review process for PD approval consisting of Step One Base Zoning, Step Two Preliminary Approval, and Step Three Final Approval. Each step is outlined below 1. General Procedure a Application for a Planned Development Zoning District (PD) shall be filed in writing on the form required for amending the Zoning Map. No application shall be accepted unless it is complete and is verified as to the correctness of the information given by the signature of the applicant attesting thereof �"► The applicant, or designated representative, is requested to be present at meetings or hearings on their application b. The proposed PD shall be in one ownership or control, or the subject of a joint application by the owners of all the property included c. At the time of filing, a fee shall be due in the amount prescribed for "Planned Development" on the most current "Schedule of Filing Fees" as found in Section 2803 of the Zoning Ordinance. d. The application shall be accompanied by filing documents and information as prescribed in this Article and/or as prescribed by the City 2. Step One - Base Zoning Application a The approval of Step One shall be construed as only concept approval for the Base Zoning and shall serve as official approval of the base zoning amendment to the Zoning Map. b This process will follow the procedure required for zoning amendments and shall include public hearings. 3 Step Two - Preliminary Plan a. The approval of Step Two shall be preliminary plan approval. At the developer's option, this step can run concurrently with, but separately from Step One .�► ,mb., ORDINANCE NO 267 PAGE THREE OF NINE b. Investigation and Reports - The Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) shall review the preliminary plan to insure it meets the requirements of the City and shall make appropriate recommendations to the City Council No public hearing will be required. c Council Consideration - Upon the recommendation from the DCC, the City Council shall review the preliminary plan and may. 1) Approve the preliminary plan, or 2) Approve requiring changes, or 3) Return the plan for revision, or 4) Deny the application, or 5) Refer the application back to the DCC d. Approval shall be valid for one (1) year or for the period given in the approved schedule of development. The developer may request an extension, not to exceed one (1) year, by formal request and action by the City Council prior to the date of - expiration of the preliminary approval 4 Step Three - Final Plan a Within one (1) year after the approval of a preliminary plan, the applicant shall file, with the Building Division, a final plan for the entire development, or when submission in stages has been authorized, for the first stage of development b. Approval shall require City Council action and will be obtained through the standard building and off-site improvement permit process when it can be shown that the proposed project meets all requirements as set forth with the q preliminary plan approval (Step Two) and technical requirements, subdivision regulations, and all other conditions are met No public hearing will be required. SECTION 33 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED The following information and documents shall be submitted with the application to the Department of Planning 1. Step One - Base Zoning Application a. Before submitting an application for a Planned Development, the applicant is urged to confer with the Department of Planning to obtain an application and discuss procedures, fees, schedules, and assistance. b. A sketch map for a Planned Development shall be submitted to adequately describe and show the intentions of the developer 2 Step Two - Preliminary Plan Provide the required number of site development plans as required by the Department of Planning showing a. Location for vehicle and pedestrian circulation indicating streets, driveways, sidewalks, topography, structures, buildings, pedestrian-ways, off-street parking, loading areas, recreation areas, open space areas, storm water retention areas, wash locations, adjoining development, major topographical features, walls, and provisions for fire protection and emergency vehicle access. Amik Amok l ORDINANCE NO 267 PAGE FOUR OF NINE b A tabulation of the land area to be devoted to various uses including an indication of land to be dedicated for street, park, school, and other purposes c. Preliminary architectural elevations and/or perspectives necessary to demonstrate the design and character of the proposed development d. Other relevant data and reasonable information as the DCC and City Council may require including, but not limited to drainage reports-computations, preliminary architectural drawings, sketches or perspective renderings necessary to demonstrate the design and character of the proposed develop- - _ - ment 3. Step Three - Final Plan The information submitted shall be detailed to indicate fully the ultimate operation and appearance of the development and shall include the following a. A final site plan showing the accurate location of streets, lots, tracts, rights-of-way, open spaces, structures, buildings or pads, utility easements, drainage-ways, parking areas, and retention basins. b Improvement plans indicating provisions for site grading, r drainage, water, sewer/septic, street lights, storm water retention, street paving, curb, sidewalk, electric, telephone, cable television, fire hydrants, and gas c. Comprehensive soil, drainage, and geological reports as required by the Building Official or the City Engineer • d. Requirements for subdivision, if applicable, as set forth in the Subdivision Ordinance. SECTION 33 05 STAGING (Reserved) Amok SECTION 33.06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS In addition to the regulations normally found in the district, the following shall apply to the Planned Development Zoning District: 1 Density - The allowable density shall not exceed that as set forth in the City's General Plan or the base zone(s). a Planned Development in more than one district- If the Planned Development is in more than one zoning district, r the number of allowable dwelling units must be separately calculated for each portion of the Planned Development that is in a separate zone, and must then be combined to determine the number of dwelling units allowable in the entire Planned Development. The distribution of dwelling units and lot sizes within the Planned Development need not be affected by existing zoning district boundaries. Individual buildings, accessory buildings, off-street parking and loading facilities, open areas, and landscaping and screening may be located without reference to lot line, save the boundary lines of the development i ORDINANCE NO 267 PAGE FIVE OF NINE When calculating density of a proposed Planned Development, the total area, including street dedication, shall be included b. Reasonable minimum lot sizes or other minimum requirements for a part, or all of the planned development area may be required by the City. 2. Setbacks and Spacing Between Buildings a. Perimeter setbacks - Generally, these setbacks will be those of the base district, unless otherwise approved by the City Council b. Interior setbacks - As approved by the City Council, provided no setback shall violate requirements of the Uniform Building Code or the Uniform Fire Code c Buildings, walls, and trailer units shall be located in such a manner so as to avoid a corridor, tunnel , linear, or barracks-like effect d Increased setbacks - Setbacks greater than those of the immediately adjacent property may be required i.e., where the intensity of development is greater than that of the adjacent property e. The following criteria shall help govern the degree an applicant shall be permitted to deviate from the base zoning district requirements 1) A better design can be achieved by not applying the provisions of the zoning district, and 2) Adherence to the requirements of the zoning district is not required in order to insure health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the development; and • 3) Adherence to the requirements of the zoning district is not required in order to insure that property values of adjacent properties will not be reduced 3 Usable Open Area There shall be a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the total area of the Planned Development dedicated or reserved as common usable open area. Such area shall be clearly designated on the plan as to the character of use and development, but shall not include a. Private or public dedicated streets, alleys, and other rights-of-way b Vehicular drives, parking, loading, and storage areas. c. Tracts or areas having a dimension of less than twenty feet (20') 4 Off-Street Parking Facilities The following shall be applied in all Planned Developments a Parking requirements shall be equal to at least the sum of the parking requirements for all uses proposed and which is equal to that required in Article 21 herein. b Development standards shall be as required by current City policy and the following guidelines- 1) Private streets may serve circulation and parking purposes if providing adequately for all public sources and convenience Air Amok ORDINANCE NO 267 PAGE SIX OF NINE 2) A building group may not be so arranged that any temporary or permanently inhabited building is inaccessible by emergency vehicles ormik 3) Driveways and circulation roadways shall be designated ' to minimize traffic congestion SECTION 33.07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES The City may require as a condition of approval that portions of the • tract under consideration be set aside, improved, conveyed, or dedicated for the following uses: 1. Streets - That the right-of-way widths as designated on the City's Street Classification Plan be dedicated for streets and utility purposes Such other streets necessary for access or development of adjacent properties may also be required 2. Easements - That owner shall grant to the City such easements as will be required to insure the necessary and orderly extension of public utilities, including easements over all nondedicated private streets over which the City may need ingress or egress for the purpose of protecting and preserving the health, safety, and welfare of the public and for the provision of municipal services 3. Underground Utilities - All electric and telephone facilities, cable, street light wiring, and other wiring, conduits, and similar utilities and facilities shall be placed underground by the developer 4. Recreation Facilities - The City may require that suitable area for parks or playgrounds be set aside, improved, or permanently reserved for the public, owners, residents, employees, or patrons of the development. SECTION 33 08 MIXED LAND USES (Reserved) SECTION 33 09 GENERAL CRITERIA A Planned Development may be granted only if it is found that the develop- ment conforms to all of the following general criteria 1. That the location, design, size, and uses are consistent with the General Plan, adopted by the City now or in the future, and with any other applicable plan, development map, or ordinance adopted by the City Council If the development plan is found to be in the public interest, but is in conflict with the General Plan, amendment of the General Plan shall be approved before approval may be granted for the Planned Development 2 That the location, design, and size are such that the development can be well integrated with its surroundings, is planned and developed with the intention to harmonize with any existing or proposed develop- ment in the adjacent neighborhood, and in the case of a departure in character from surrounding uses, that the location and design will adequately reduce the impact of the development so the project will not be detrimental to the adjacent property. 3 That the location, design, size, and uses are such that traffic generated by the development can be safely accomodated without congestion on existing or planned streets. ORDINANCE NO. 267 PAGE SEVEN OF NINE 4 That the location, design, size and uses are such that the residents or establishments to be accomodated will be adequately served by existing or planned public facilities and services 5 That the location, design, size, and uses should result in an attractive, healthful, efficient, and stable environment for living, ^ shopping, working, and leisure activities 6. That the development plan make appropriate provision for the preservation of the environment, both natural and man-made. SECTION 33.10 CONVERSIONS OF PRE-EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 1 The City Council may approve a Planned Development for an area previously subdivided, in which case said development and any structure constructed thereon, shall be considered in conformance with zoning requirements as to lot size, setbacks, and height Such an area may include a group of structures either substantially constructed or in existence at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance, which structures when constructed were intended to be similar in purpose and are substantially similar in design and purpose on the effective date of this Ordinance. 2. Applicants for conversions of pre-existing developments to Planned Development District Zoning shall follow the application and procedures for plan reviews as set forth in this Article, except that the Department of Planning shall advise the applicant as to appropriate modifications which might be made in application requirements 3. In a pre-existing development, the signatures of 51% of the property owned by both number and area shall be required to initiate a • Planned Development application for such areas, provided, however, the Planning Commission may initiate a Planned Development conversion within a pre-existing development in accordance with the provisions of this Code SECTION 33.11 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS 1 Limitation on resubmission - Whenever an application for a Planned e• Development has been denied, a similar application for the same area, or any portion thereof, shall not be filed within one (1) year after the date of denial. 2. Adherence to approved plan and modification thereof - The application shall be bound by the plans, narrative, covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the developer and his successors in interest, and by the conditions prescribed for approval of the development. The approved final plan shall control the issuance of all building permits, and shall restrict the nature, location, and design of all uses Minor changes in final development plans may be approved by the Building Official if such changes are consistent with the purposes and general character of the development plan All major changes, modifications, and amendments shall be approved by the City Council. 3. Revocation for failure to adhere to approved plan or satisfy conditions of approval - Failure to comply with the approved final development plan or any prescribed condition of approval shall constitute a violation of this Article as prescribed in Article 27 The Commission may, after giving notice, hold a public hearing and recommend the revocation of a base zoning district to the City Council, who may consider the recommendation and act in the same manner as in considering any zoning request. ^ ORDINANCE NO. 267 PAGE EIGHT OF NINE 4 Expiration and reversion of Planned Development Zoning District - If within one (1) year after the approval of the preliminary plan and designation on the Zoning District Map of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, by the City Council , construction specified in the final development plan has not commenced or cannot be ION developed as approved, then the Planned Development shall be recalled to the City Council for review. If it has not been shown that it is in the public interest, and if the applicant has not demonstrated good cause necessitating the extension of time, the City Council shall revert the Planned Development designation to the base zone existing at the time of approval, or any other appropriate designa- tion If, however, the applicant shows good cause necessitating an extension which would serve the public interest, then the City Council may grant an extension of time not exceeding one (1) year Under such circumstances, the developer will be obligated to update the final plan and improvements plan to meet current City require- • ments. 5 Transfers and assignments - If during any stage of the development, the property under application, or any portion thereof is assigned to another, then the assignee shall be bound to the requirements and design of the approved project 6. Cancellation by applicant - Cancellation may be initiated by the applicant of the property covered by the application by means of a written notice Cancellation of the application shall become effective thirty (30) days after receipt of the Notice of Cancellation in the office of the Department of Planning,, and shall P cause the reversion of zoning to the original designation • _ 7. Use of occupancy - No building or structure within the Planned Development shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or • portion thereof shall be made until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy as provided under the provisions of the Uniform Building code 8. Planned Development precedents - The approval of departures from standards ordinarily required for a base district zone, or for any other PD, shall not be considered as precedent setting when approved for any Planned Development project 9. Construction standards/building permit issuance - The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes, policies, guides, and detailed standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improvements 10. Map change - Approval by the City Council of the Base District Zone in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the Apache Junction, Zoning Ordinance shall constitute approval of the necessary amendment of the Zoning District Map of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, and the map shall be changed 11 Termination of a Planned Development after completion - A Planned Development may not revert to any base district designation upon completion unless, and until all requirements of the base district are complied with Should the applicant of an approved Planned Development wish to discontinue the Planned Development use upon completion, including the continuation of the Planned Development Zoning District designation, the process shall follow the j procedure required for zoning amendments. ORDINANCE NO 267 PAGE NINE OF NINE SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health, and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM a . lexa e City Attorney r ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ()It Go ITEM # MEETING OF -4' MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED -COUNCi LPrAN SHANKS COUNCILf"MJ DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR EIBSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL MAYOR CLARKE UNANI!^,OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED k ABSTAINED TOTAL V ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ?)-E ?/ e/ L°4/jc/ ITEM # MEETING OF 4,70,} MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED VICE_ COUNCILMAN, STEELSMITH ' COUNCILMAN TAYLOR , COUNCILMAN Kill COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE ✓ UNANF1.OUS IN FAVOR I OPPOSED j ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 5 AMENDMENTS TO MOTION FOR FIRST READING WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 267 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING. FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE STEP 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 267 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the entire ordinance) . STEP 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 267 BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. STEP 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, nOWNIQN$W, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II , LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING ARTICLE XXXIII , SECTION 33.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS (approved or denied) it /. ITEM NO . 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 267 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO , 271, PZ-13-84 , THE APPLICANT IS WEEKS 2, WOULD PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A, APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C , OPPOSED 411•116. oak F pyACHF✓G O % y y n.04 U ,,ki I`'-: ,, . z ? '41RizoNP ` 'city o f (*ache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 9, 1984 MEMORANDUpl THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: �° MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ , ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR 4a , FROM: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-13-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 271 ) JUNE 5, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING JUNE 19, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-13-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 271 , is a request by the applicants Harvey and Shirley Weeks to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence. The site is a vacant 5-acre parcel located on the west side of Colt Road between 2nd and 4th Avenues in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include businesses, apartments, mobile homes, and vacant land. 4.11014, Other Information The Commission authorized a Commission Initiative at their meeting of March 27, 1984. Planning Department Comments The Planning Department finds that this rezoning would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Approver for Agenda 17 —.-1 Date , First Reading WSWItem(j Second Reading ✓ Public Hearing _ Old Business - New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-13-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 271 ) May 9, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of May 8, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Conway/Taylor 5-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-13-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 271 , application of Harvey and Shirley Weeks for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. The reason for this recommendation is: According to the General Plan, it is the best use for the land." Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas i► it (. RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 271 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-13-84 , application of Harvey and Shirley Weeks ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 271 , Amok AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION. PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-13-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. The applicant dedicate the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) ORDINANCE NO 271 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-13-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The East 1 of the Southwest 4 of the Northeast ,'- of the Southwest ; of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. • SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM A • A 1 /- David F Alexander \ City Attorney a PZ-13-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 271 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR. GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE E. JUNCTION DR. I-----,, . . I ' CR-5 E. 2ND AVE, ra CC CC CC - Q 1 - cn J W I— Q U O O Z Li CC 3 - Cf; 4 - „, . AyF. ....... 1 1 CB-. I I HWY, I I CB-2 60-70-80-89 \` 1 " �i I 1 I OSUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1"=300' 1 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER OF GENERAL RURAL) L-J i 1 PZ-13-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 271 - PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 �.. - - MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ;�.��.,..� • .° ,EX/ST/N¢ ADS :_-• - -_ ,:, -. Ni. - `� E. JUNCTION DR, y ■ ._ .... __.„...,_,...,_,,.......,.::_ „...:......... ,___ .:_.: _., ,....2 • s x ` :f� I CR-5 .•'`. .T _ II I CD • #. Q cc I:. I• t1l -F ; II It - SUBJECT SITE — Y _,^a - f :. N SCALE. 1"=300' r " Lrmrrs OF ZuN/NG (REMAINDER OF GENERAL RURAL) Ir�l ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEf1 II f1EETIfdG OF (0:—/J-4/ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED Oak COUNCILMAI DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH . /LCE MAYOR MTV SON--- COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL _MAYOR CLARKE UNAVIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ... 40. • • - � �'" c+..�.�.��,...,� .�3-, ,E,'i��..te, ate,-F� Rr w'iet�p`+ ;t�.r•,'',`,,t=s4a5kiiF�t,� y� .f'"-�'�t"L.F*�,`.K.. • ITEM NO . 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 271 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO , 273, P7-15-P4 . THE APPLICANT IS COX 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B , IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED kPQACHEJ0 0 3 �' n� U �i ,' � 0 rl �, . z ar.`q,p/zONP (l COZty 4 Apache &9unctaon DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 9, 1984 Approver for Agenda 46 Date , Item # MEMORANDU O. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Fc:ding (1/51 / Second Reading THROUGH: ` r/MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ V.-Public HearingACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR Old Business New Business FROM:,` JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Consent Agenda SUBJE . REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-15-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 273) JUNE 5, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING JUNE 19, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case number PZ-15-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 273, is a request by the applicants Donald and Catherine Cox to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 5-acre parcel located on the north side of Superstition Blvd. , between Monterey and Plaza Drives in Section 17. It is designated General Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include a mobile home/travel trailer park, and vacant land. Other Information Number of Property Owners 8 Number of Exempt Properties 1 Number of Affected Owners 7 Number of Signatures 6.5=92.9% Signatures by Affected Area 90%± Planning Department Comments The Planning Department finds that this rezoning would be consistent with the General Commercial Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the east thirty-three feet (33' ) , the west thirty-three feet (33' ) , and the south fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. • 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-15-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 273) May 9, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of May 8, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Conway 5-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-15-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 273, application of Donald and Catherine Cox for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33' ) , the west thirty-three feet (33' ) , and the south fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 . This rezoning would comply with the General Plan of Apache Junction. 2. It is the best use of the property. " .-• Recommended Motion See attached. JAN:mas 4.ko RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 273 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-15-84 , application of Donald and Catherine Cox ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 273 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-15-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS OR CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AS CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO REZONING APPROVAL. The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33' ), the west thirty- three feet (33') and the south fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes Amok BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE. OPTIONAL CHOICES a "Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only one of the Commission's reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) ORDINANCE NO 273 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-15-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL eIRNA The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The South of the Southeast ; of the Southwest of the Southeast a of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache • Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33'), the west thirty-three feet (33'), and the south fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS - �, All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 /^ Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM t i� , " %a David\F A .exander City Attorney Adak ialb. PZ-15-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 273 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR-GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS r W. ROUNDUP ST. i I I PROPOSED I TH/PD TH ------- m A W. GREASEWOOD ST. ce n o >- ¢ o W N ¢ Wz v —CB-2 I au., . 4 zj ..- . : - - • • -• - z W. SUPERSTITION BLVD, I I TH I 1 Ir 1 1 SUBJECT SITE 40 N SCALE: 1"=200' LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) jL. J �r` - -- � - - PZ-15-84 # ;_= _ T • PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 273 •. ."r _ - -' -...- PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR-GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL _- BUSINESS ' ±ma - y4' :..i ffiEx ssr7i76 Rc142) W. ROUNDUP ST :.�_ =vim F f •;-� - ! ?" PROPOSED Wit: ` .y _ 41 Ili .i- TH/PD Alt ',� ya � ' i it, ..'y ? .r r •em • s' i. ti s....s-�r..r- c - -s'L-- :� +,'.r"C� CB-2 • Ili ::".'ba;-3;A:-�';- -_-"-:- =�r::"'-- 3 i ,,.,--V �'-". 47^. `''-_-cis-ti!_.�t-s,-• .. I', TH r• it 'ii,.. • �.ice"- 'Y " -c�F :$ss•- ! r '1:v.i }ems:^ ^^ K =P :r.-ate t L 1 X : ,5 ;. r 'I, Ir 'ter.+ � . - l SUBJECT SITE � t-_.c- - 'x Es • ^�a N SCALE: 1"=200' —; LIMITS OF ZONING (RE"1AINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) r'y • • • • ITEM NO . 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 273 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . Alin. /. (, PQACHE'✓G k Pl 2 ` t, dr''' �l / i, jj I i, V ,3• '•p , r Y Z 1{_ F �...... its o ucke unction May 29, 1984 MEMORAND • MAYOR & COUNCIL THROUGH: 7CITY MANAGER FROM '/JjCOMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT: RESIGNATION AND APPOINTMENT TO PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Jennie K. Bennett has submitted her letter of resignation from the Parks and Recreation Commission effective immediately. She will be out of town for approximately five months and feels her position should be filled by someone who has more time to put forth Her resignation leaves us with two vacancies. To date, two talent bank applications have been received, and both of these individuals have attended a Parks Commission meeting and appeared interested in serving. The Commission is recommending that Jack Rivers and James Appler be appointed to fill these vacant positions. Mr. Rivers term will expire 4/30/86 and Mr. Appler on 4/30/87. Your consideration of these recommendations is appreciated. pw Approver for Agenda D toy,/ Item # First Reading `�ld`� 4 Second Reading ____ - Public Hearing Old Business New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 �J. 'I • k'!S A/`1b j1e rPf--:f1Ti °A' C` ' ,A M / sS,v,✓ o ` //f7'c/C/� J L� 7 /92 1�u rc Se„u 4 /i r /- ,? i�1 77,5 X i t'/ v% 1774 01 / i!s �/ ,j��y��e„- Al, 1_/Y/Yc_/7- r L 4_ / //474 7 /= /? r//eT. 3 c N r f=l / a F %//c= e G Tr) , //p i /) S , G i/, 7 ?J/ %-76---7 Gc &-s % W/ L ��2- c_ /c � �=' ,vac Amor Ink c:0 q'9120 'f 0 � CLCy22 v Zr,-,,,,,ZUn TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR C rea /1&)) BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE. f DATE: 3/a7/3V NAME:: �J Ct PS" 4 r/e r TELEPHONE: - 7/ " (home) [� �J �] J �4 1-a m (of fic: ADDRESS: /`3/ . .4a cori �'�/J, ZIP CODE: 2Sp'a(2 OCCUPATION: HOct .2 Wlir,band (if retired, please /innfdicate former occu pation or profession) / EDUCATION: CO//e e - ,8� ��IX — 1v�/�e l( " la;1� cn-Sa/Pm Z/C, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO:2iLTNITY ACTIVITIESl9WOrked ' r�year.f Will/ (OledIt's; ye take,i prO\TravnW1n\D)lrriaiJenaace1Liey/a, ' \ CZ r1/ red a s I. i e 4.arep i �C/kriC oo! mQznahc ,.,„�1 iiers es '„ wqfj ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: . NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. 6- -77zel Revised 6/19/S1 Signa re of Applic(-7/ 01t i -*r:r'( ...) COPY 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQp,CNE 4 11 x1RIZOO' Wily o cpuclie G-)- zt;-2,,., ion TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Pil5. fi IZ6f:G BOARD/ OMMISSION COMMITTEE 12-Ck '! DATE: aNAM✓: }V g-go TELEPHONE: �f/(� �Z" 7-� (home) j� ?/ /� p (office ADDRESS: F4 Nd /. 9// ' ZIP CODE: F.5- 0 OCCUPATION: 5,,Lr4,4-' ll/�(nfj� f.�fi,Ek 7 P. J . 37 (if retired, please indicate former occupation/ or profession) EDUCATION: /JjqP44 W 'c I7.b757,E ,C,,- Ce 44 Ee4'\ ' PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COKMUNITY ACTIVITIES: r�'1� (!�1 F/" ' .� A. L;11/ 4 kf ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: ,4R/ e}.xpCY,I kG4/ x'DCinWP"mk) 4.;;T: NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. ( 4,4 irat-rel:A-4. Revised 6/19/SI S nature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JJNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0 � ITEM # MEETING OF POTION BY: SECONDED BY : V2A/0- YES NO ABSTAINED COl1NCIl MANLl4MIANO V �► COITI C I LMAN H T LL COEiNC ILEA_M TAYLOR OUNCILMAN STFFI SMITH MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL -- - M_.' ._-. .- _ _ _:.. - .. .... ...:.. -„e�-,.r.. �?i+.t+--�T.±A'r..,ay ':,etds +n�t^'�d;� 'J', .:4e. _ �. gam. . . t{„F ITEM NO. 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MS JENNIE BENNETT FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT ',�l4JJ ,/ 7=-,r'/�-'' BE APPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSI//ON/ TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF MS JENNIE BENNETT , SAID TERM TO EXPIRE (APRIL 30 , 1986 , AND THAT ;..4/..): /G'e-✓'-S BE ( APPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION , SAID TERM TO EXPIRE ---"(APRIL 30 , 1987 . ACHF rc r �r6 r ,,I .,,...„„. U f"W r1 z '9R/ZONP City a placlie &unction May 30, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAY AN9 MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER 6' /7 FROM: CITY CLERK et/ SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-23 -- APPLICATION FOR LOTTERY FUNDS As required by State law, each year the City must apply to receive its share of the Local Transportation Assistance Funds (State lottery) for th upcoming fiscal year. This application is submitted in the form of a resolution adopted by the City Council . Proposed Resolution No. 84-23 follows the format as recommended by the State. This application must be filed with the Arizona Department of Transportation prior to June 18th, therefore, it will appear as an item on the June 5, 1984 regular agenda. kmc Approver for Agenda "-Z.- Date Item # First Reading Second r..'IcEng Put,i,c Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 I► Isei. / RESOLUTION NO. 84-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REQUESTING THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO AUTHORIZE TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FUNDS PURSUANT TO SECTION 40-1102, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES WHEREAS, the Thirty-fifth Legislature, second special session of . r 1982 established a Local Government Transportation Assistance Fund from the proceeds of the Arizona State Lottery; and WHEREAS, the Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation shall determine the total amount of requests for Local Government Transportation Assistance Funds from Cities and Towns, and WHEREAS, these funds are to be distributed on a monthly basis by the State Treasurer to cities and towns requesting funds, and WHEREAS, these funds are to be used for transportation-related purposes: Road and street construction, repair and maintenance, construction at traffic signals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, that the Arizona Department of Transportation is hereby requested to take necessary steps in authorizing Local Government Transportation Assistance Funds for the above mentioned purposes. -,°t om _ s f-_—' PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA , l_ Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM 4 ,—.__ ,C. David F Alexander City Attorney Resolution No 84-23 Page One of One ... _ ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES a 7 / 7 i / 'CL. are/iv i„-- , . r .. , , i:r ' ITEM # I MEETING OF - . MOTION BY: — SECONDED BY: i d - ie (--- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITN `/ , . COUNCILMAN HILL COUNC I L'1AN TAYLOR j . COUNCILMAN DAMIANO / . �� r.�nvn� rTn j I C€-4 Y O R E I L I MAYOR CLARKE UNANI7JUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL V 1• • • • z. • • • • ITEM NO . 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT RESOLUTION NO . 84-23 , A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , REQUESTING THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO AUTHORIZE TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FUNDS PURSUANT TO SECTION 40-1102 , ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES , BE AND HEREBY IS ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED . Q p,C HF r I1' U 1`Lv�4I' lFiw 1 0 '.1R/ZONP V.it o� �JGLcl28 unction May 30, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AID MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER A 7 FROM: CITY CLERK ,,/^ , SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-24 -- AUTHORIZATION FOR THE INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS In accordance with the Arizona Revised Statutes, the City Council must, on an annual basis, authorize the city treasurer (city clerk) to invest city funds. Proposed Resolution No. 84-24 authorizes the city treasurer to invest idle funds of less than $100,000 within specific guidelines. These guidelines are set forth in the State Statutes and are strictly adhered to each time the city's idle funds are invested. Amounts in excess of $100,000 must follow the same regulations, however, additional collateral must be provided by the depository insti- tution (bank) and can only be invested for 30 days at a time. Amounts of less than $100,000 are covered by federal deposit .-. insurance. This resolution will be effective for the entire upcoming fiscal year. kmc //��� Approver for Agenda �1'i D to Item N First Reading 6/S7W i t' Second Read;rr, - Publ;c Hearing - Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 RESOLUTION NO 84-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS OF LESS THAN $100,000.00 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO INVEST CITY FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction is „oft, required by Title 35, Chapter 2, Article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, to adopt procedures for the deposit of the City funds of less than $100,000.00; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt annually a Resolution of continuing effect authorizing the Treasurer to invest funds collected for the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 35-327 (G), the Treasurer of the City of Apache Junction is authorized to invest funds of less than $100,000 00, collected for the City, as provided in the procedures of Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 35, Chapter 2, Article 2, as follows 1. The City Treasurer shall award deposits to one or more financial institutions either within or without the corporate limits which offer the highest rate of interest commensurate with the safety of such deposit; 2. The City Treasurer shall give notice to each public depository within the corporate limits and, in his discretion, to any other public depository in the State of the amount of City funds available for deposit, the period of time such funds will be deposited and the time bids will be opened; such notice shall be in writing unless the Treasurer determines that ( the amount of time necessary to prepare and transmit such notice in writing may Il result in a loss of interest earnings in which case notice shall be by telephone or other appropriate means; 3 At the time specified in the notice the Treasurer or his authorized representative shall open the written bids and announce the bids; 4 The City Treasurer shall award the bid to the public depository offering the highest rates of interest provided such interest rate is not less than One Hundred and Three Percent (103%) of the equivalent bond yield of the'' United States Treasury Bills of like terms; 5. If the depository offering the highest rate of interest has bid or is eligible for only a portion of the funds, the Treasurer shall award that portion to such depository and the remaining portion shall be awarded to the depository bidding the next highest rate of interest; 6. In the case of tie bids, the Treasurer shall award the enacted deposit to the financial institution with the lowest ratio of public deposits in relation to its capital structure; the public depository shall be responsible for submitting documentation of such ratio and the Treasurer shall have the right to rely on the accuracy of such documentation; 7. The Treasurer shall prepare a report of each award of enacted deposits specifying the public depositories notified, the rate of interest bid by each, and the depository or depositories to which the deposit was awarded and shall submit such report to the City Council at its next regular meeting. Resolution No. 84-24 Page One of Two 8 The Treasurer is authorized to invest in Treasury Bills or other United States Treasury Securities with a maturity date of twelve months or less if no bids are received at an interest rate of no less than the equivalent bond yield of United States Treasury Bills like term computed from the asking price on the business date previous to the date bids are open; 9. The Treasurer shall keep in his possession for not less than two years all bids received, 10 The City Council reserves the right, through its Treasurer, to reject any and all bids PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1984 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM • Davi F Alexander / City Attorney Resolution No 84-24 Page Two of Two ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES &r. 9-Y ITEf1 # f d MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED Y�ECTtI�v non;,.�� COUNCILMAN_ STEELSMITH V COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HTI L / LCOUNHA#KS ,COUNCILMAN DAMIANO _MAYOR CLARKE _ UNAN I TOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL v /r -. • - ' ; �` '' 5.i# • ITEM NO . 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT RESOLUTION NO . 84-24 , A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA , PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS OF LESS THAN $100 , 000 . 00 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO INVEST CITY FUNDS , BE AND HEREBY IS ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED . EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA The Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona met in regular session on June 5 , 1984 , at the hour of 7 : 00 p.m. The Mayor called the meeting to order , and upon roll call , the following answered present : Wendell Clarke, Mayor Jimmy Eidson, Vice Mayor Thomas Damiano, Councilmember Norman Hill , Councilmember Marie J. Shanks , Councilmember Henry Steelsmith, Councilmember Ilene Taylor , Councilmember Also present : Kathy Connelly, City Clerk , and Michael J. McNulty, City Manager The Mayor declared the presence of a quorum. The Mayor then advised the City Council that it was in order for a resolution to be introduced ordering the sale of $1 , 500 , 000 principal amount of Street and Highway User Revenue Bonds, Project of 1984 , of the City to further accomplish the purposes set forth in the official form of ballot submitted to the voters of the City on May 15 , 1984 . Thereupon, the following-captioned Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 84-25 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ORDERING THE SALE OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA STREET AND HIGHWAY USER REVENUE BONDS , PROJECT OF 1984 , IN THE TOTAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1, 500 ,000 , FIXING THE DATE AND HOUR OF SALE, DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE OF BONDS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilmember then moved that Resolution No. 84-25 be adopted and Councilmember seconded the motion. Upon roll call vote, the following voted aye : Wendell Clarke, Mayor Jimmy Eidson, Vice Mayor (... c!.CHE ,/G ,i AMMO. A". Z Y YW ���+� RI ZON P `Oity o. ace 2unction r^ May 31, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: 4i- � CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: BID OPENING -- STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS The City's bond advisor has requested that you establish the date of July 9, 1984 at 10:00 a.m. as the date for opening the bids on the City's Street Improvement Bonds. They have also requested that you establish a special meeting for noon on the 9th for the purposes of awarding the bid. It is a practice in the bond bidding business to be able to know and to act on the award of the bonds on the same business day that the bids are submitted. MJMc/ltl AIM Ikk Approver for Agenda et �, Item # First Reading Second Reading Public Hearing �.. Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 THIS ITEM IS BEING PREPARED BY THE BOND ATTORNEY AND WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE WORK SESSION , Thomas Damiano, Councilmember Norman Hill , Councilmember Marie J. Shanks , Councilmember Henry Steelsmith, Councilmember Ilene Taylor , Councilmember and none voted nay. The Mayor declared Resolution No . 84-25 adopted. There being no further business relative to the above matter , the meeting was adjourned. City Clerk , City of Apache Junction, Arizona 2 RESOLUTION NO. 84-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ORDERING THE SALE OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA STREET AND HIGHWAY USER REVENUE BONDS, PROJECT OF 1984 , IN THE TOTAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1 , 500 , 000 , FIXING THE DATE AND HOUR OF SALE, DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE OF BONDS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS : Section 1 . That $1 , 500 , 000 Street and Highway User Revenue Bonds, Project of 1984 , of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona ( the "City" ) , which were voted on at a special bond election held in the City on May 15 , 1984 , shall be offered for public sale by the City at the date and hour set forth in the official notice of sale of bonds, substantially in the form attached hereto. Section 2 . That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause said official notice of sale of bonds to be published once a week for four ( 4) successive weeks in the Mesa Tribune, a newspaper published in Maricopa County, Arizona and of general circulation in the City, prior to the date set to receive bids on the bonds . Section 3 . That the immediate operation of this Resolution is necessary for the preservation of the public health and welfare and an emergency is hereby declared to exist , and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval by the Mayor and Council of the City, as required by law, and it is hereby exempt from the referendum provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984 . Mayor , City of Apache Junction, ( SEAL) Arizona ATTEST: City Clerk , City of Apache Junction, Arizona APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F. Alexander , City Attorney, City of Apache Junction, Arizona $1 , 500 , 000 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA STREET AND HIGHWAY USER REVENUE BONDS , PROJECT OF 1984 NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE OF BONDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed, unconditional proposals for the purchase of $1 , 500 , 000 principal amount of Street and Highway User Revenue Bonds , Project of 1984 ( the "Bonds" ) , of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona ( the "City" ) will be received by the Mayor and City Council of the City at the Office of the Clerk of the City, City Hall , 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 , until 10 : 00 a .m. , Mountain Standard Time, on July 9 , 1984 . The Bonds will be dated August 1 , 1984 , and will be issued in fully registered form without coupons , in the denomi- nation of $5 , 000 , or any integral multiple thereof . Interest on the Bonds shall be payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1 of each year , beginning January 1 , 1985 . Principal on the Bonds will be payable at the principal corporate trust office of , in Phoenix, Arizona, which will be designated by the City as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent , when due upon surrender of such Bonds at the principal corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent . Interest on the Bonds will be payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owners thereof , as shown on the registration books for the Bonds maintained by the Bond Registrar and Paying Agent, at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding that interest payment date . The Bonds will be serial Bonds and will mature on July 1 in each of the years and in the amounts as follows : Principal Year Amount 1985 $100 , 000 1986 100 , 000 1987 125 , 000 1988 125 , 000 1989 150 , 000 1990 150 , 000 1991 175 , 000 1992 175 , 000 1993 200 , 000 1994 200 , 000 FORM AND DENOMINATION: The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form without coupons, in the denomination of $5 , 000 , or any integral multiple thereof . The initial purchaser must accept one fully registered Bond for all amounts in each maturity for which names and addresses of the initial owners of the Bonds were not provided to the Bond Registrar at least seven ( 7 ) days prior to the date of closing . REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER: The Bonds will be transferable only upon the bond register maintained by the Bond Registrar upon surrender of the Bonds to the Bond Registrar with an appropriate instrument of transfer . PRIOR REDEMPTION: Bonds of this issue, maturing on or before July 1 , 1989 , are not subject to call for redemption prior to maturity. Bonds, maturing on or after July 1, 1990 , are subject to call for redemption prior to maturity in whole or in part on July 1, 1989 , or on any interest payment date thereafter , at the option of the City, by the payment of the principal amount of each Bond called for redemption plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption plus a pre- mium payable from any source lawfully available therefor , the premium to be computed as follows : Redemption Dates Premium July 1 , 1989 through and including January 1 , 1990 3 % July 1 , 1990 through and including January 1 , 1991 2 % July 1 , 1991 through and including January 1 , 1992 1 % and without premium thereafter . AUTHORITY: The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona, including par- ticularly Title 9 , Chapter 6 , Article 5 , Arizona Revised Statutes , as amended, and a Resolution to be adopted by the Mayor and Council of the City on July 9 , 1984 . ELECTION AND SECURITY: The Bonds represent the first and final installment of an aggregate voted issue of $1 , 500 , 000 principal amount voted at an election held on May 15 , 1984 . Principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable from the xevenues received by the City from highway user taxes , in- cluding motor vehicle fuel taxes, and all other taxes, fees , charges or other moneys returned to the City pursuant to Title 28, Chapter 9 , Article 5 , Section 28-1598, Arizona Revised Statutes , as amended, for street and highway purposes . PURPOSE OF THE ISSUE: The Bonds are being issued for the purpose of providing money to finance the improvement, con- struction, reconstruction, acquisition of rights-of-way or maintenance of City streets and highways . INTEREST RATES : Bidders are to name the rate or rates of interest per annum which the Bonds are to bear , not to exceed twelve percent ( 12% ) per annum, to be expressed in multiples of one-eighth ( 1/8 ) or one-twentieth ( 1/20 ) of one percent ( 1% ) ; however , no fractional cents will be paid (or accumulated for payment) on any Bond, and interest rates bid which indicate payment of fractional cents will be deemed to be a waiver of the right to payment of such fractional cents . Interest will be calculated on the basis of 360 days per year or 12 30-day months . Any number of interest rates may be named, but the rate of interest on the Bonds of each separate maturity must be the same single rate for all Bonds of that maturity from their date to such maturity date . Any bid which specifies a split interest rate or the payment of any premium offered in anything other than federal funds will not be considered. 2 FORM OF BID: No proposal offering to purchase less than all of the Bonds at the par value of all of the Bonds and accrued interest for all of the Bonds will be considered. Each bid shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope marked "Proposal for Street and Highway User Revenue Bonds" and shall be addressed to Clerk , City of Apache Junction, Arizona , City Hall , 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 . All bids must be unconditional , and bidders must use the bid form pre- pared by the City. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes , Inc. , Financial In ft, Consultant to the City, has reserved the right to bid on the Bonds . RIGHT OF REJECTION: The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any irregularity or infor- mality in any bid, except that the time for receiving bids shall be of the essence. AWARD OF BONDS : Unless all proposals are rejected, the City, at a scheduled meeting of the Mayor and City Council of the City to be held on July 9 , 1984 , will award the Bonds not later than 1 : 00 p.m. , Mountain Standard Time, on July 9 , 1984 , to the responsible bidder offering to purchase all of the Bonds at the lowest net interest cost to the City, which shall be determined by computing the aggregate amount of interest payable on the Bonds from August 1 , 1984 to their respective maturities and by deducting therefrom any premium. GOOD FAITH CHECKS: Each proposal must be accompanied by a certified check , drawn on a bank doing business in the State of Arizona, payable to the order of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for not less than Thirty Thousand Dollars ( $30 , 000 ) to guarantee performance of such proposal . No interest will be allowed on the good faith deposits , and the checks of the unsuccessful bidders will be returned to the bidders ' representatives promptly. The good faith check of the successful bidder will be retained by the City uncashed until the delivery of the Bonds , at which time said check will be cashed and applied toward the purchase of the Bonds , or said check will be cashed and the proceeds thereof forfeited to the City as and for stipulated and liquidated damages if the successful bidder fails or neglects to take up and pay for the Bonds in accordance with its proposal . DELIVERY: The executed Bonds will be delivered to the purchaser in Phoenix, Arizona, at the expense of the City, at the law offices of O' Connor , Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover , Killingsworth & Beshears , P.A. , 3003 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona, Bond Counsel , or at the request and expense of the purchaser , at any other place mutually agreeable to the City and to the purchaser . It is expected that delivery will be mace on or about August 6 , 1984 . Payment of the entire pur- chase price must be made in federal funds . COST OF BOND FORMS : The City will bear the cost of the Bond forms and the printing thereof and will furnish fully executed Bonds, registered in the name of the purchaser , to the purchaser upon payment therefor . All costs and expenses of the initial registration and payment of the Bonds will be borne by the City. The expenses (and transfer taxes , if applicable) pertaining to subsequent registrations of the Bonds shall be paid by the transferor . 3 i LEGAL OPINION: Bonds are sold with the understanding that the City will furnish the purchaser with the unqualified approving opinion of O ' Connor , Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover , Killingsworth & Beshears , P.A. , of Phoenix, Arizona . Said attorneys have been retained by the City as Bond Counsel and, in such capacity, are to render their opinion only upon the legality of the Bonds under Arizona law and on the exemption of the interest income on such Bonds from federal and State of Arizona income taxes , the delivery of said opinion being a ''` condition precedent to the delivery of the Bonds and the purchase thereof by the successful bidder . The fees of Bond Counsel will be paid from Bond proceeds . CERTIFICATES TO BE DELIVERED: The City will deliver a certificate showing that no litigation is pending affecting the issuance and sale of the Bonds . The City also will deliver an arbitrage certificate covering its expectations concerning the use of proceeds from the sale of the Bonds and related matters . CUSIP IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS : It is anticipated that CUSIP identification numbers will be printed on the Bonds , but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto shall constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser thereof to accept delivery of and to pay for the Bonds in accordance with the terms of its pro- posal . No CUSIP identification number shall be deemed to be a part of any Bond or a part of the contract evidenced thereby, and no liability shall hereafter attach to the City or to any of its officers or agents because of or on account of such numbers or any use made thereof . All expenses in relation to the printing of CUSIP identification numbers on the Bonds and the CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of said numbers shall be paid for by the City. FURTHER INFORMATION: Further information, including copies of the Notice Inviting Proposals for Purchase of Bonds , copies of the bid form, copies of the Resolution pursuant to which the Bonds will be issued, and copies of the Offering Statement containing information relating to the issuance, sale and security for the Bonds, may be obtained from the under- signed at City Hall , 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 , or from Rauscher Pierce Refsnes , Inc . , Suite 3450 , Valley Bank Center , Phoenix, Arizona 85073 (Telephone Number ( 602 ) 257-7770 ) , Financial Consultant to the City. The City will furnish the successful bidder , without cost , up to 25 copies of the Offering Statement relating to the Bonds . DATED: June 5 , 1984 . City Clerk , City of Apache Junction, Arizona ( SEAL) 4 RESOLUTION NO. 84-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE-MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ORDERING THE SALE OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, STREET AND HIGHWAY USER REVENUE BONDS, PROJECT OF 1984, IN THE TOTAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1,500,000, FIXING THE DATE AND HOUR OF SALE, DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE OF BONDS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That $1,500,000 Street and Highway User Revenue Bonds, Project of 1984, of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona (the "City") , which were voted on at a special bond election held in the City on May 15, 1984, shall be offered for public sale by the City at the date and hour set forth in the official notice of sale of bonds, substantially in the form attached hereto. Section 2. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause said official notice of sale of bonds to be published once a week for four (4) consecutive weeks in the Mesa Tribune, a news- paper published in Maricopa County, Arizona, and of general circulation in the City, prior to the date set to receive bids on the bonds. Section 3. That the immediate operation of this Resolution is necessary for the preservation of the public health and welfare and an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval by the Mayor and Council of the City, as required by law, and it is hereby exempt from the referendum provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona. P116" PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. WENDELL J. CLARKE, MAYOR City of Apache Junction, Arizona ATTEST. KATHLEEN CONNELLY, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORMS DAVID F. ALEXANDER, CITY ATTORNEY PIRESOLUTION NO. 84-25 ilio PAGE ONE OF ONE 1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (OD ITEM # ,,7 MEETING OF 11 MOTION BY: f'5-" )� SECONDED BY: l VItv 7 YES NO ABSTAINED .fIIINCI I MAN.AEI IAP1IAN0 .-. r.n11NIC I LMAN N T LL COUNC ILE Th TAYLOR OUNC I I MAN .3I IAl--y • €IDSnN OUNCILMAN_ STFFI SMITH ✓ , MAYOR CLARKE V UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL / v ..,, • ITEM NO. 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-25, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ORDERING THE SALE OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, STREET AND HIGHWAY USER REVENUE BONDS, PROJECT OF 1984 , IN THE TOTAL AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1,500 , 000 , FIXING THE DATE AND HOUR OF THE SALE, AND DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE INVITING BID PROPOSALS FOR PURCHASE OF BONDS , AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. (Sp.cHE O gRiZoNP ` its o Cpache ounction May 31, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 7 FROM: `7 CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY TO BE RELEASED FROM 90-DAY NOTICE REQUIREMENT We have received notice from the Department of Economic Security that they intend to relocate their office here in the City. The current lease they have with the City requires that they notify us 90-days prior to the date they intend to move. They are requesting that the Council waive this requirement so they can move as soon as they are able to conclude a deal on a new location. The administration has no problem with this request. At the same time, and in keeping with Item 12b, we would ask that you give .•. permission for the negotiations to acquire the current building occupied by D.E.S. This would be very advantageous to our plans to expand the facilities here in the City complex. Should we be able to acquire the building at a reasonable cost, we would transfer the Planning Department to that building instead of building a new modular structure as we had intended. MJMc/itl Approver for Agenda First Reading (.-r!^� l2 �b Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business ,„ New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ,?icf ! ( ITEM # 44- a MEETING OF(- AS MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : `. n YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILr"AJ DAMIANO I N./ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN Imo- IL L \//' .MAYOR CLARKE UNANI'IOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 4 'ee: `i „.,;a=.gar ITEM NO . 12a BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY BE RELEASED FROM THE 90-DAY NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT . ITEM NO . 12b BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE FOR THE CITY TO ACQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY BUILDING . 'OW OM. ITEM #13 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Apache Junction Arizona The Honorable Mayor and City Council. In connection with the proposed issuance(s) of bonds aggregating approximately $1 ,500,000 scheduled for election on May 15, 1984, by the City of Apache Junction (the "City") , the City is seeking employment of competent professional financial advisors. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc. ("Rauscher") offers its services as financial advisors for the proposed financial programs, the services to include the following: 1 . Rauscher will consult with the City , its consulting engineers, bond attorneys and all other necessary persons as required from time to time to aid the City in connection with the formulation and preparation of its financing program. 2. Rauscher will develop and submit to the City preliminary plans and/or programs for financing of required improvements, such plans to outline the nature of the obligations to be issued, maturity dates .•. and other pertinent provisions thereof, including estimated annual debt service requirements. Such recommended plan or program will take into consideration those factors which in our opinion are best suited to complete the financing referred to in the first paragraph under the best circumstances and at the lowest possible cost. Additionally, such financing will be so designed as to accommodate the future needs of the City, so that the ultimate benefit might be derived. 3. After approval of the preliminary plan or plans, we will perform liaison between the City and its consulting engineers, bond attorneys, etc. , in working out all financial details of the issues to the best advantage of the City. 4. In the event a bond registration/transfer/paying agent has riot been selected in connection with this financing , we will advise and assist the City in that process as required by the City. The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Apache Junction Page 2 5. Prior to the time of bond offering , we will work with the City in preparing an offering statement containing data , financial and otherwise, concerning the City and the proposed project. In addition, we will assist in preparing the "Notice Inviting Proposals for the Purchase of Bonds" , which will be given wide circulation to bond dealers and underwriters as well as large permanent investors who may be interested in bidding on or investing in the bonds. 6. Rauscher will submit copies of all offering statements and other material deemed pertinent to the nationally known agencies reporting on and/or rating municipal credits in order that such agencies may have ample time to consider the obligations prior to the sale thereof, so that they may advise their clients as to their opinion of the obligations to be issued. 7. If deemed necessary, Rauscher shall also submit the offering statement and supplementary materials to nationally known municipal bond insuring firms prior to the sale in order that they might evaluate the obligations for insurance purposes. 8. Rauscher shall also prior to the sale of the Bonds advise the City as to the timing of such sale in order that it will attract competitive interest with little interference from the sale of comparable obligations of other borrowing units. 9. Rauscher shall also advise as to the terms and conditions under which such obligations are to be offered to produce a financing program for the City. 10. Prior to sale, we shall work with the City's bond attorneys and bond registration/transfer/paying agent in order to furnish the City with the necessary information and form for the ordering of the blank bonds so that such bonds will comply with both the functional and statutory requirements of bond registration. Rauscher shall also, prior to sale, advise the City as to the various responsibilities leading to the final documentation and delivery of bonds. It is understood that the City will utilize a competent bond registration/transfer/paying agent for securities registration, transfer and debt service payment purposes and a firm of attorneys who are recognized as authorities on municipal bond law to advise the City on legal proceedings related to the bond issue and to prepare necessary legal proceedings to the end that such proceedings will be available in transcript form for the purpose of obtaining a "merchantable legal opinion" . Compensation for services to be rendered by Rauscher shall be for the period of the dates of the contract through the delivery of the Offering Statement and Notice of Sale. 41106. The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Apache Junction Page 3 In consideration of the services to be rendered as specified herein, the City agrees to pay Rauscher $6,000.00. It is expressly agreed that the above mentioned compensations shall in all cases be paid from bond proceeds. It is also understood that the City will reimburse Rauscher for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by us in +� connection with the printing of the official notice of sale, offering statements, printing of the bonds, travel , bond credit ratings, postage on mailing of the Notices and Offering Statements and for advertising in financial publications as necessary or mutually agreed, such amount to be paid from bond proceeds also. It is expressly agreed that this contract shall be only for the bonds set forth in the first paragraph, if authorized and issued. Compensation to Rauscher shall be made only from bond proceeds. If, for any reason, the sale of these bonds is not concluded, it shall not be necessary for the City to compensate Rauscher. Upon the termination of our contract, as set forth above, nothing shall be construed as to preclude Rauscher from bidding on the bonds alone or in association with others, at such time as the bonds are advertised for sale. Respectfully submitted, RAUSCHER PIERCE REFSNES, INC. Harry C. Pernell Vice President The foregoing proposal is approved and accepted on behalf of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1984. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk, ROLL CALL VOTE SHEE NOTES I "4/ 4'/ P ITEM #i MEETING OF /15-// ./( MOTION BY: - SECONDED BY: 2- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ..� COUNCILMAN HILL V C-EHAC-WANXS- COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V V . LCOUNCILMAN FIFE! SMITF __MAYOR_CLARKF UNANrOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL v Auk ITEM NO . 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CONTRACT WITH RAUSCHER , PIERCE , REFNES , INC . , BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # (/ j MEETING OF 7 MOTION BY: Wi SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED CohINCTI MAN D MIAN0 / --* CoUNCILMAN HILL i COUNC ILA TAYLOR l� COttN€C I LPG : ► f E I DSON COUNCILMAN. STFELSMIT MAYOR CLARKE V UNANI�1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED i TOTAL Adak Ada► • - y • Fc.. " - 1 j ITEM NO . 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY C NCIL OF _THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT OLo/Li,)jh Y((./j ff _ BE APPOINTED AS CITY MAGISTRATE , SAID TERM TO EXPIRE APRIL 30 , 1986 . (41ACHt 4 2 O U Z .�RrzONp. (Oily on Cpace c&unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 11 , 1984 MEMORANDUM T THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: [ MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ 4 / ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR i 71 FROM: AJ JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 5, 1984 REAPPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Mr. Harvey Morrison' s term of office on the Board of Adjustment will expire on June 30, 1984. Mr. Morrison has expressed a desire to be reappointed to the Board for a three (3) year term. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Mr. Harvey Morrison be reappointed to the Board of Adjustment for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. JAN:mas Approver for Agenda '--- ate Item # First Reading GS/ri /S Second Reading Public Hearing /Cid Business ,V New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 PQ ACNE✓oti, o �� O z k ;_;tom C-1,9izo0' `0it1 on 4acie 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 11 , 1984 MEMORANDUM( � THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: X ` MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ . , ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: (N JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 5, 1934 REAPPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Mrs. Cora Blatterspiel ' s term of office on the Board of Adjustment will expire on June 30, 1984. She was appointed several months ago to fill a vacancy that occurred when another member resigned. She has attended every scheduled meeting since being appointed and has expressed a desire to be reappointed to the Board for a three (3) year term if the City Council so desires. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that Mrs. Cora Blatterspiel be reappointed to the Board of Adjustment ` for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 O y U -L. O z \\,.....,_ dqPlZ.o:NP amity 4C94pac�ae functionction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 11 , 1984 MEMORANDU 0 THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: t- /If MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ , ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: " JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJEy)r_i\r` REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 5, 1984 REAPPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Mr. Sam Gardom' s term of office on the Board of Adjustment will expire on June 30, 1984. He was appointed several months ago to fill a vacancy that occurred when another member resigned. He has attended every scheduled meeting since being appointed and has expressed a desire to be reappointed to the Board for a three (3) year term if the City Council so desires. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Mr. Sam Gardom be reappointed to the Board of Adjustment d'' for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEP1 # MEETING OF (/'� MOTION BY: 4' SECONDED BY: t 0 "O YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH r., COMP'CILV'M SHA#KS- COUNCILMAN HILL _ COUNCILMAN TAYLOR V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE UNAN I""OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL • • • • • • .:.c. �-,?r .«••jy7-•9•'�am'+zr ?r4K , + ''�r'cza.-at.,yt: 'RWr. ;C,,.3hie*' „",� —` .; f°'t i - 4 ITEM NO. 15 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT it U r i Sova AND 1,J ,. (J-`4"J'\ , BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT , SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE JUNE 30 , 1987 . Amok Adimmk June 4, 1984 Mayor Clarke and City Council Members: I will be out of town on June 5th and will be unable to attend the City Council meeting. I would like the record of the meeting to show that I , as Vice Mayor for the City of Apache Junction, support the removal of Mrs. Midge Conway from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Sincerely, 61-"AerrVvv7... S• Caeovio Jimmy Eidson Vice Mayor JE/kmc PQACHF✓G O �' n� U O z \\,:, ---_. ,---,...--4::. ".: 'IREZON it y 4pac�ae u nct icn N ` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 11 , 1984 MEMORANDUMLO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: *If MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ 6 ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: , i1 JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJEC : REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 5, 1984 REAPPOINTMENT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mr. Tony Vehon' s term of office on the Planning and Zoning Commission will expire on June 30, 1984. Mr. Vehon has expressed the desire to be reappointed to the Commission for a three (3) year term if the City Council so desires. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that Mr. Tony Vehon be reappointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. JAN:mas Approver for Agenda P ate Item # First Reading I(e/ f( Second Reading _ Public Hearing _ Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 O i'n s U ,. i5 Z \\,, '1P iz.o\-0'" `0ily o C4ace &unction - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 11 , 1984 MEMORANDUM f.: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ( ) MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ ' ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: ;\jI JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 5, 1984 APPOINTMENT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mr. Harry Polomskey' s term of office on the Planning and Zoning Commission will expire on June 30, 1984. Mr. Polomskey has informed the Planning Office that he does not wish to be reappointed to the Commission due to other commitments. At this time, we are requesting that the City Council appoint a new member to the Commission for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that be appointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 4( PQACHF✓o o ! 'Po n.A 3 ,, f� , z 'IP/zoOs (it? on &47,a,che 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 11 , 1984 MEMORANDUM T0; THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: 2 j MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: lk JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 5, 1984 APPOINTMENT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Mr. Tom Sansoni ' s term of office on the Planning and Zoning Commission will expire on June 30, 1984. Mr. Sansoni has informed the Planning Office that he does not wish to be reappointed to the Commission due to other commitments. At this time , we are requesting that the City Council appoint a new member to the Commission for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache - Junction, Arizona, that be appointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a three (3) year term which will expire on June 30, 1987. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 CHAPTER 11 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION • 1011 11-1-1 Established 11-1-2 Membership 11-1-3 Officers 11-1-4 Duties 11-1-5 Meetings 11-1-6 Voting 11-1-7 Fees Section 11-1-1 Established The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction is hereby established. Sec. 11-1-2 Membership A. The planning and zoning commission shall be composed of a total of nine members who shall oe residents of the city. The members of the corri;lsslon shall be appointed by the mayor. subject to the approval of the council . These appointments shall be for a period of three years, unless sooner removed by the mayor with the approval ,of the council , either with or without cause. The terms of the rt , members shall be so that tne terms of no more than three members shall expire in any one year. The initial appointments shall be for two members with terms beginning on July 1 , 1979, and expiring on June 30, 1920, for two members with terms beginning on July 1 , 1979, and expiring on June 30, 1981 and three members with terms beginning { on July 1 , 1979 and expiring on June 30, 1982. Thereafter, all ;`FAA members shall be appointed for full three year terms , except that in 4r the event of death or resignation of a member tne vacancy may be filled for the unexpired term. The term of all members shall extend until their successors are qualified; except that three successive - unexcused or unexplained absences from any regular or special meeting shall be grounds Tor termination at the will and pleasure of the ==� = appointing authority without the necessity of a hearing or notice and such action shall be final . B. All members shall serve without pay. Members of the commission may be rei^ ,ursed for actual expenses incurred in connection with their duties upon authorization or ratification by the commission and approval of such expenditures by the council . Sec. 11-1-3 Officers • : J ? The conrnssion shall elect a chairman and vice chairman from among its ee own ne-r ers , who shall serve for one year and until their successors are elected and qualified, The chairman shall preside at all meetings -77- Rev. 6/80 4 U :'` 'tea ,.lily .+",Z `41R/ZaNP` Vuty O e7 pacJ e v ZGi!,;(iOfl TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Any BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE Also, pant-dime aee ttuca<e iwspee ton. DATE: May 21, 1984 NAME: Ray E. Sodettbettg TELEPHONE: 982-0921 (home) (officL ADDRESS: 2900 W. Supettzti %on Blvd , / /y ZIP CODE: 85220 OCCUPATION. Reti ked eeeetAic ion(42 yJr s) , 22 a 4 -theta e ate an ee ti ca.f eonnttac ton (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) doing ate phases o6 efee Akcae eonustttue Uon tin So ekn Muconztn. EDUCATION: Ghaduate 04 (W14,4 ea n4s-cn Eeee tueaL Apppen<t c.eea hip 5-years caucus e, 4 hon t cow ens in efec 't.Lca.e estcma c.ng at Unkvetcuty a6 Glcseaws.in, S vaiuowo voccctinna.P cold tnchviLc l rouwtseA at Betokt Wizconzin Voea c.ona.e School. PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COI1MUNITY ACTIVITIES: Town o{ Beco.c t, WI Schoo.e Baand 4 ynd; Town a g Beloit WI E.eee tttJ sic e I n s pee tote 3 yius; C,c ty o 4 Beeo.i t WI El ectAicaI. Exam,cn tng Boated 3 yit , IBEW/NECA Appnen tcez hJp Committee 4 ytvs. __ ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: Membett- Epiphany Lwthetcan Chutteh, 10 ytus; Cangnegati,on, ahes,iden S ChuAch Council, 3 ytc ; pnesentey �setivting ass Chunch Tneatsunett. Ahd_2�eg Lon , Hub - AnarHO T��Nr on ;on 3 ea Az. Re6ettence4: C'ay Watch, Hub Jondan, E.vtst Eedettati Bin Tnurt o • NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. ;.., _ _Z,r_--61--6 ---/,__________ Revised 6/19/S1 Signature of ,iplicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 .... (ip,CHE ✓ • •• ;..‘:A.'') -,;,-:,!=—',' -- '11?IZ0 ?' COily o &479ac/ e v ZL `�,, rZ TALENT BANK APPLI CATI UN .--• / FOR 7/(x7tl..�/� g Z,<,41.,-i.Y� BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE i DATE: . j��Fr" NAIL: F('"1*'c> I7 V. W f TELEPHONE: 7, �-- � 5� (home) / (offici, ADDRESS: 5 /lg S, >-'3,f' k' ied. ZIP CODE: �,�, ,, Q OCCUPATION: �p/r/S/PC)C'/iO.t! :6`"lQrL'/ iI/ G� —i,7,, ef /4;.0,--A-6„,6 (if retired, please indicate former dccupation or profession) EDUCATION: c • ao� ������06 , PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMUNITY ACTIVITIES: /f:/p bs ii / r-7s T t2 4d, ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: -<f u s'7 / .m /� / /�/ S lam(! n.V' iPi>!' /v„ ! T�'017 44aartci, to Xicci CJ' . fUS 7`)Pc/• • NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/SI gnature o Applica t 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 v'` •gf'/E ./e/A. :N.- z.:3- 7:), • !;,:'"'" --- ,,::.4.,1,2 ....0 ) /41?/2-0 cOi„i,iy o 0-4pache (ic7:d- un,),;ion TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR 1f`Ckf1(\w'A Zdn(n COmn2cSS /0 ^BOARD/COMMISSI ON/COMM ITTEE DATE: - 1 4 NIUE: d Ler1 . A-(oecsor... TELEPHONE: ?g2 3(Z 9 (home) .5',2 -7 O 7 Z (offic ADDRESS: £ (5 e O S ci e Aue ZIP CODE: gSa2; 0 OCCUPATION: S C l Cr (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: 41 q q cc. l- c o ( (`ct cLa_,e, Ici),3' s . irlarIOi e fth_ 9 rS Mesa Cc, 6,.ww.m ait (q7,3 7S= ptc,-C-1,,y Sc It PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMIUNITY ACTIVITIES: 1) •g-+5'en a,(1 (f\cji- W ork<nq Am. ADDITIONAL PERTINENT 'INFORMATION/REFEP.ENCES: D ( O A�( p!` k,' Q S Q C. 1 t 1 P cC- lk to clot\- ��e kv a or. S k .c c k - lam n ?o r'6 `180R. 07 NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. _ If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. eci ,,,P ,d_feteg.,...„ Revised 6/19/S1 Signature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982.8002 i---.,. -•• ,-,•::::4,sj :,,,,,t,..-- - ..-- `1R110 > V?:ly on liGiche v ZL ',:(ion TALENT BANK APPLI CATI ON ,.. FOR `' ' BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE �, DATE: 7) c NA' : .-"+ �Le'Zti' � �.� TELEPHONE: pf�.r� - 5 7 1 / (home) (offic, ADDRESS: ,�Jv�-'_ - �` t `;h1�r ;, - •,L& zlfc-op : c �s ` _( CI OCCUPATION: ,�- 4. - -ti.` �G- , ( ^- r4 2-e-z zt ,, C' e.. !.z.t ,~(if retired, please indio'ate former occt1pation or profes fion)1 EDUCATION: �jfi f11Lf(,. �.� - d e/� 'I .9 PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO: IUNITY ACTIVITIES: _, L_r -, r 7C-7l/ /„,. /l1-0-ey[ lam(/ d'4-'!UL%/ ./,L-y, ("1 4L (i2't/L4 6 ;:- ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/81 Signature of AppLant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 � PeACNF,k Gy o ky;c4 } O . - 0 '1,9izo lP' c--0 ily o 0*c1che a n,, ion TALENT BANK APPLI CATION Pi • FORa rt r) 1 r1ei Zen 1 rig BCARD6OMMISSI COMMITTEE f ON DATE: 7" e-S — NAME: , TELEPHONE: 91/?2- 9 q (home)r<..S -.A /y Li n 11'5 t4 QQ �c 7.5 /o 2 V (officE ADDRESS: '� V . e xC.,t I5 n{ ZIP CODE: P<Z Z d U' YrSb _-4,n 7 'r --��f� W77 7 mod'?' OCCUPATION: �J � �S� �� , � (if retired, please indicate former occupation or professio ) /6y/7 s1Co1�Q EDUCATION: / / _ // Ja DDl — 47� r,5 , / om t h S4* -4121- �r ,ca r? -t 4vi • PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMUNITY ACTIVITIES: /gI/<, //U c)( i h i ,r(p4 c, JCT Ai- / 2 m G s 7f c f-, . 7f`2 a t it e.' i n, e'e•tJ/X *ed f jra.s 1,o_ni rorn /1'11 h T q h &)Acre w,�,, ,Qc� //v e,- h S c`1 a a. / .a q o te h`i t J ALI i vi 7#/ -s i ty 2d Ke l%l7e ssi9 , Ili / i.. ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INA1R, TIO R FERENCES,/ / GU /� i 71Q efi,e. ., / Cut. tg//Cc, w ,ea), NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. 7il �-( �e Q Revised 6/19/31 Signatur oft�i Applicant a 01 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 i Q/8�- �/099 PQp,CHF ✓ ' : (70'9RIZ0Vj 'f y on C 71c1ch e ZL ',:viion TALENT BANK APPLICATION A......., FOR / Oft)/// /1c, qi 2,9 jV BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE 4 DATE: 5-- a .5. (-, _/', N1. TELEPHONE: ' "� ��/,s` (home)i) Vt�S �G) ( (of ficE ADDRESS: / 3 c/ 2, F �C'Gl / 4e,r,/2/4zIP CODE: eS`-), 0 OCCUPATION: Se /( L p/ e9 ems( (//;;(i/ed'aF7/G (if retired, please indi'cate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: ////i 4r ..Sc L> o o / (--",./J---.. PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: L7 )/ 4.,',/ l0 / 2 / 4° . / ,ll a-f /1-7P-c,' p ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/S1 Signature of App ica t 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 IW r:3 I\CHE- ✓ fir ; - -6t "'41?l Z O '' aily U75 0 '/2Giche c u, ion TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Q'3(,c.twvvsv.,\ 4\ BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: S--- A5-r R NA_`E: 0-05.QA L U . '� -.,\A$3 t TELEPHONE: )R -\--n5 (home) 9 PA— ' \ \ (of ficE ADDRESS: 9 8 s. ,S__09 V K,p S ZIP CODE: c'AA rj OCCUPATION: > �11N.45�.. \� profession) (if retired, pleasee indicate former occ ation EDUCATION: tU,o)..0„ Y � W\ Q!- ,aQ, -+--a,,:)1c�.1i52NVONOQX.1(;) , ``+ PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO:1UNITY ACTIVITIES: _tt _ os�A -- -1)R g r e ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. 4- XV-\)\./VIN Revised 6/19/S1 Sign ure of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 � Pe p,CN :�e2 '1RIZON/ V ily U 0479ache v un,:!ion TALENT BANK APPLI CATI ON FOR Pett/VNi/V 0- 5720 /v/r/ a BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: /V/ / a // / 92 / NA_'E: e0 8G"Jz7- `% \Th' ?.„ 'NJ S' /) TELEPHONE: 7.83 - z Z--// (home) 8. 3 30 I I (offic ADDRESS: c75-S C. Wo/J 4 o ZIP CODE: es.22...a OCCUPATION: i'17"9-N G C`/Z (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: .5%-a•... L� co - G5 - • PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ITY//ACTIVITIES:�J/e A-7'• AJ S : or AVE-2 r✓N4 M1 TA L-- "!J 2 e"�'7AM-S/r../ a- N/t-7�. rjS S e. • / JAL c ff"!J'S/ ni G G rvt r J/U ?Gtfh'S/A/G ',by-it /t -si y r /4S.,c. d 1 S Z. Amok ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: a.Z'O `4. Y/ZS 1),e(c/m r S'c`1c7a/1 4647c)-1) o ✓F---2 rtl wt(: T yNMNA- --i-,wtG-"__)r tvfgeswgitettrim ,e"XNeirei/1Nc- • NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/81 Sianat of A li nt 1001 NC2TH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTICN A2IZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(An")OR74%007 � PQp,CNF�Gy l r :4'j1rS n ::...iC.7:-:13:1 'IP rz aNj Vi,),'y on &4 pac 2Pi G•7 zt 2"-z vion TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR I>�!✓Ni/1/g- ��OA//f BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: /4 fJ y 3 Q 1 Y'�I NA."E: Ti,///L/ 2-/ /l rE/e TELEPHONE: /9.P.,2— 77 7 (home) J /17— � 'c�L' (office ADDRESS: /,y 0-2J,D �Ol.(��47-/ri/, /, J t ZIP CODE: J' /jr j id it17 OCCUPATION: 4u_ro /E&A//7/4L'I4p jj` i ,E",¢CAL V. -- 1✓7X, i.- 4Z. C o i"G4- ( ./111e,47-i- o., (if retired, please ffldicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: /7 9AEZ -- 1111 , 400 � j d),6 . 6-0 / eL(.,P iT�-/V # T-,-�4) %/`� 4, ` . , a_ MA Tata. 1"aiiT/e1/4 �d-/E/Yez PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO: {UNITY ACTIVITIES: a ES i�t %D �-E� .frdo/ VE4 //r) Ay d oth Ana.th q .4,/ f►a,J7-1/ BiiL,� 7"-w Sty 6-id 107-,42 ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION REFERENCES• -PO4.474 7- ,a-A. ;5 e)ei k l e.,41/94.2) '© er-E4 S NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/81 Signa re of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Amok, AVL r\ cr 4 ITEf1 # 1(-1° MEETING OF (//r MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: /101-1-01/ YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC I LMAN. STEELSMITH COUNC I LMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HTLI OUNCILMAN DAMIANO !MAYOR CLARKE r UNAN I TOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1(5P 1 9 ITEM # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: I 62 ►7 Y V` SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCIL"1AN TAYLOR ✓� COUNCILMAN HILL nTCrAN-SHATMS- - V-I--C-E--f9AY9-R--TMON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO 1-COUNCILMAN STEELSM.IT4 ' __MAYOR_CLARKF V , UNANIm..OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ,. K` _ Ms • ,�.,.t:"+.. `'ATE' .,.-�+�34.°t'RFZ,.+R,-..,. ort,�ys s�.hek.:Y'.+* a''.r,.r :x?$ef'+�'�.em' w-irtSw.en°sv.le .:s • ITEM NO . 16 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT MS MIDGE CONWAY BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF MS MIDGE CONWAY , SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30 , 1985 . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT , AND , BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE JUNE 30 , 1987 . IIlik Ilk cp,CHF✓G2,.cs*c ,-?..- i3A, 7) s ,ZoNPP `0ity o f Lpache unction '..., May 21 , 1984 MEMORANDUM TO 0 THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: 'iDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ; C THROUGH: CITY MANAGER REGARDING: INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT - PINAL COUNTY - FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO IDAHO AND IRONWOOD ROADS (AGENDA ITEM) Attached for your consideration is the intergrovernmental agreement between the City of Apache Junction and Pinal County for improvements to Idaho and Ironwood Roads. As an extension of County projects, all manpower, equipment and supplies were ........ provided by Pinal County for City projects. The reimbursable cost payable by the City to the County is $14,772.80 for all work performed by the County. Approver for Agenda A`-� G5atp Item M First Reading 1`�/��`► - --L- Second Reading RWB.sh Public Hearing Old Business Ref: 100.051 ✓New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Phial CIuuntg Drpar#mrn# -.�ya„ ,scat • . Enginrrring Diuiiinn CHARLES B.MINTER.R.L.S a P E. P.O.BOX 727,FLORENCE,ARIZONA 85232 JOHN M ENCINAS %Y DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS SUPERVISOR OF ADMINISTRATION COUNTY ENGINEER TELEPHONE(602)868-5801 EXT 410 &DESIGN .. '•. 1. t 5 May 7, 1984 Richard W. Broman, Director of Public Works City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Broman, As previously, discussed attached is an agreement between the City of Apache Junction and Pinal County for the construction of Idaho Road and Ironwood Road southerly from Lost Dutchman Boulevard to the ends of existing pavement. After approval by your council please return the agreement to me so that is can receive the Board of Supervisors approval . Also attached is a copy of the estimate used for establishing the construction costs of $ 18,458.25 for this project. The estimate is based on the following: Equipment Costs - F. E. M. A. Rental Rates dated 9/27/83 Labor Costs - Pinal County Payroll Supplies & Material - Present Bid Prices Please note the city's credit of $3,685.45 for the Ironwood Road south of Southern project will be deducted from the cost of this project. Respectfully, 4.7 7 Charles B. Minter, County Highway Engineer PINAL COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT CBM/pmo cc: file - 2 attachments - 2 1 Construction Estimate Idaho Road 32 Ft. Width 879.40 Ironwood Road 32 Ft. Width 1,601.76 TOTAL 2,481.16 Lin. Ft. EQUIPMENT 4 days Grader @ $ 224.00 $ 896.00 10 days Dump Trucks @ $ 186.00 1,860.00 4 days Water Truck @ $ 224.00 896.00 4 days Roller @ $ 116.00 464.00 Various Equipment (Pickups, Broom, Chat Spreader, etc. ) 250.00 Sub-Total $ 4,366.00 LABOR 4 days Foreman @ $ 74.29 $ 297.16 22 days Equipment Operators @ $ 70.72 1,555.84 12 days 3 Man Survey Crew @ $ 173.68 260.52 12 days Drafting @ $ 53.21 79.82 35% Fringe Benefits 767.66 Sub-Total $ 2,961.00 SUPPLIES & MATERIAL 1500 Tons AB @ $ 1.90 $ 2,850.00 22 Tons MC 250 @ $ 227.50 5,005.00 15 Tons RS-2 with 2% Latex @ $ 189.75 2,846.25 110 Tons Chips @ $ 4.00 440.00 Sub-Total $11,141.25 TOTAL $18,468.25 'mok '— AGREEMENT This agreement is made effective this day of , 1984'between Pinal County a political subdivision of the State of Arizona hereinafter referred to as COUNTY , and the City of Apache Junction , a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as CITY WHEREAS 1. COUNTY is presently constructing Idaho Road and Ironwood northerly from city limits line at Lost Dutchman Boulevard and CITY is desirous of having COUNTY extend the construction southerly on Idaho Road an approximate distance of 879 feet and southerly on Ironwood Road an approximate distance of 1602 feet 2 Both CITY and COUNTY are responsible for maintenance and construc- tion of roadways in their respective areas 3 CITY has or will budget funds to reimburse COUNTY for construction costs 4. CITY presently has credit with COUNTY in the amount of $3,685 45 from previous construction in Pinal County (Ironwood Drive south of Southern Avenue) NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of mutual premises, covenants, agreements and stipulations of the parties herein contained, IT IS AGREED as follows 1 That COUNTY will construct Idaho Road, an approximate distance of 879 feet southerly from Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Ironwood Road an approximate distance of 1602 feet southerly from Lost Dutchman Boulevard, to the same standard as COUNTY construction extending northerly from Lost Dutchman Boulevard Estimated costs of construction within city limits is $18,468 25 2. That CITY upon completion of construction and billing will pay COUNTY the amount of $18,468 25 less outstanding credit of $3,685 45 3 Notices to the CITY will be delivered to Richard W Broman, Director of Public Works City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 4. Notices to the COUNTY will be delivered to Amk A Charles B. Minter, County Highway Engineer Pinal County Highway Department P 0 Box 727 Florence, Arizona 85232 5 This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties, and no statement, promise, or inducement made by either party, or the agent of either party, that is not contained in this written agreement shall be valid or binding, and this contract may not be enlarged, modified or altered, except in writing, signed by the parties and endorsed hereon, 6. This agreement shall have an effective date of the day of , 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written PINAL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Chairman Member Member ATTEST. Charles A Guinn, Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Roy A Mendoza, County Attorney 7 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL Mayor ATTEST. City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney, City of Apache Junction p ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES t1 ITEM # i MEETING OF / MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED rnUN r i pnnN c _ --G-Cru rr�Ttr�rcrr� COUNCILMAl`! DAM IAN0 COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ✓� A E--MMYO-R E I D€O N COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN. HIt L v� .MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL IOW • .." .,.:::t �c�i...a f'�4 S� f, �?''.'A`4" ,�, 'e � ITEM NO . 17 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND PINAL COUNTY BE APPROVED AND THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO REIMBURSE PINAL COUNTY $14 , 772 . 80 F-H-B4M ACC--04JA — 1-k}"#*BER— FOR THE PAVING OF IDAHO AND IRONWOOD ROADS AS AN EXTENSION OF OTHER WORK IN THE AREA PERFORMED BY PINAL COUNTY . PQ p,CHE do O' - , ly(, rU 0 ..4�. :il1 z .... :4 . L.p„,, ,,:i „. . , gR,ZpNP `city o , ipache ounction May 31, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: (-/JCITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL B.L.M. LANDS We received an offer from the Bureau of Land Management to add additional acreage to the lands being sought by the City for equestrian trail purposes. The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed this offer and has endorsed it. I will have a map showing the various areas that B.L.M. is offering to the City. MJMc/jtl i Approver for Agenda �'4--- 9atp Item # First Reading (/e/Qt f, /9 Second Reading - Public Hearing - Old Business _.3Z New Business -Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ?It Cr.), tyF IN REPLY REFER TO: United States Department of the Interior A-180 74 I'' ``�'• 2740/025/WJR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT\ a Phoenix District Office '° "' "% 2015 West Deer Valley Road Phoenix,Arizona 85027 April 12, 1984 Mr. Michael J . McNalty, City Manager City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. McNulty: Pursuant to our discussion concerning the adding of lands to the City's Recreation and Public Purposes Application, A-18074, the Open Space/ Equestrian Trail System, attached is a list of legal descriptions and a map showing the public lands not currently under application. These lands can be added to the current application if the City so desires. If not , these lands may be subject to acquisition by the State of Arizona, private exchange proponents involved in the Navajo-Hopi relocation program, or offered for public sale. We will hold in abeyance any decision concerning the future of these lands until we hear from you. Sincerely, (fa , k,. Opal R. Redshaw Acting Area Manager Phoenix Resource Area Enclosure (2) Legal description list Maps ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • /l ITEM # 1E7 MEETING OF ( /6 /cf-7 MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL v/ L AN ---SH S-- COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ • LCOUNCILMAN STEELSMITb __MAYOR_ CLARKF V UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL V • • • • • • • { - �.. - "' Y fa",, 46• ``e�'.` T#'+kP»' J.� " C''r�..4 va.� r m F !� 1 - - . • • • ITEM NO . 18 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION RECREATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSES APPLICATION ##A-18074 BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LANDS AS OUTLINED BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE/EQUESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEMS . Amok rilCH�✓GytF�, 7 / 7 1 .y Nfi gRiZONP cOity a padre unction May 30, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAY AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER \ jf FROM: CITY CLERK0,,, SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR CITY LIBRARY Arizona Revised Statutes 34-102 requires the employment of an archi- tect or engineer for public buildings if warranted by the nature of the construction. The hiring of an architect will be the first step in the construction of the new city library. A.R.S. 34-103 establishes that the architect may be selected either by a competitive bidding process or direct selection. By following the competitive bid process, a minimum of thirty days time is needed to allow a response. Since architects do not generally respond to such bid announcements, the city will be better able to make a selection by dealing directly with individuals. ... At this time, the Council is being asked to authorize the City Manager to begin the negotiations necessary to make this direct selection. The actual contract for an architect will be presented at a later date. Copies of the Statutes pertaining to this process are attached. kmc Approver for Agenda 7,;/ Item N First Reading 19 Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business _ New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 .J § 34- 101 PUBLIC BUILDINGS & IMPROVEMENTS Title 34 i • ti ARTICLE 1. ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS t t n § 34-101. Definitions ' In this title, unless the context otherwise requires, "agent" means ti ' the state or any county, city or town, or officer, board or commission thereof, and irrigation, power, electrical, drainage and flood control i i , ' districts, tax levying public improvement districts, and county or city so 1 i i j improvement districts I am ! 1 As amended Laws 1969, Ch 52, § 9 Su I Historical Note spc i i i Source: § 1, Ch 51, L '19, § 2600, R C '28, Prior to the 1969 amendment, agent - I i j am., § 1, Ch. 114, L. '52; 9-101, C '39, was defined as "any state or county of- Pill j ' Supp '52,in part ficer, board, commission or other goN- i ; ernmental agency or person" Ref: Governmental agencies were included • , within the definition of "agent" by s ! ' i Laws 1952,Ch 114,§1 ' I Cross References Cc St Corporations,officers and agents,see§10-191 et seq. �ii' Insurance,definition of agent,see§20-282 T , 1 11 I. I Notes of Decisions In general 2 I' II 1 Liability 3 A 41 , I Validity I by p I Constitution and laws of state are k. B 1 part of every contract Id = callii II I. Validity rt his 3 State has right to regulate and con- 3. Liability the a trol contracts School Dist No One of Where plans and specifications pre- Pima County v. Hastings (1970) 106 pared for use in constructing public C. 1 1 / Ariz 175,472 P 2d 44 building do not show, by a seal, who is pubh ' / responsible for their preparation, the 2. In general unknown draftsman is liable for the vio- ,$riot !I I Where contract is incompatible with lotion, and contractor and agent for !at] statute, statute governs School Dist public construction may be liable if they 7 quireNo One of Pima Count- v Hastings aid and abet the unlicensed draftsman (1970)106 Ariz.175,472 2'd 44 Op.Atty Gen.No.57-140 of obt i z• D. § 34- 102. Employment of architect or engineer for work on shall . i public buildings and structures; contract 1 'I, A. When authority is given by law to an agent to construct a 2 , state, county or other building or structure, or additions to or altera- 3. • , ; tons of existing buildings or structures, an architect or engineer or 4 • ` i1' both, as warranted by the type of construction, shall be employed by 344 5 . ;, _ '1 -I I .. i' ( Ch. 1 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS § 34- 103 l the agent if the work is deemed of a nature warranting such employ- . e ment. B. When an engineer is employed, the agent may enter into a con- s tract with the engineer,and fix his compensation. Historical Note Source. i l 4 § 1, Ch 51, L '19; § 2600, R.C. '28, "erect" by Laws 1952, Ch 114, § 1, ...sub.. am, § 1, Ch 114, L '52, 9-101, C '39, which act also added the provisions re- Supp '52,in part lating to the employment and compensa- "Authority" and "construct" were re- tion of an engineer I t i spectively substituted for "power" and Cross References Public works, necessity that drawings, etc be prepared under direction of registered architect or engineer,see§32-142 Registration of architects, see § 32-101 et seq. Library References Counties C111(1). C J S Counties§173. States C=90 C.J.S States§112 - • § 34- 103. Employment of architect; direct selection; public competition; program of public competition A. The employment of an architect shall be by direct selection or by public competition. 1. B. If the agent concludes the work to be done does not justify calling for competition to select an architect, or if the work may, in his judgment, be more satisfactorily conducted without competition, the agent may employ an architect. C. If an architect is to be selected by competition, the agent shall M publish an advertisement of the competition not less than thirty days _ } prior to the date set for closing the competition, stating the type and location of the proposed work for which competitive designs are re- ; quired, together with information as to the proposed cost and means of obtaining full information of the proposed competition D. The agent shall prepare a program for the competition, which shall state: 1. The purpose and character of the proposed work 2. For whom the project is to be done 3. The maximum amount of money available 4. Plans of floors,levels,structural features and elevations 5. Scale of plans. 345 f ` li i 1' I; § 34- 103 PUBLIC BUILDINGS & IMPROVEMENTS Title 34 6 Memorandum specifications of the material and nature of con- '• struction required. 7. When, where and to whom competing architects may submit i their proposals. 8 The compensation of the architect selected • 9 That the right to reject any or all bids is reserved 10. That the agent will decide which plans and specifications are .••. deemed best or most fitting, and the person preparing them will be 4 employed as architect unless there is legal reason for not so doing. 1 11. That all proposals, except the proposal accepted, will be forth- i t } with returned to the persons submitting them. E. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the competition I. imay be conducted under the rules of the American institute of archi- tects. St I. Historical Note li Source 9- s. II §§ 2 to 4, Ch. 51, L. '19, § 2601, R.C. '28, 9-102,C. '39 , 11 1 Library References 1 Municipal Corporations C=236 C.J S. Municipal Corporations § 996 'i i 0 I n { : § 34- 104. Contract with architect M Ab Ad , 1 A. The architect employed shall execute with the agent a contract co; iI I to prepare working drawings and details and specifications for the1. proposed project, and to supervise its construction, unless the agent Co does not employ the architect to supervise the work. 7.i Pro B. The compensation of the architect shall be: Ser Val 1 For preliminary sketches and tentative design, a specified21 /2 amount, or a commission not to exceed one and one-half per cent of the proposed cost of the project, which shall be deducted from any z ^i subsequent commission if further employment is agreed upon st trol 2 For complete working drawings, specifications and details, a Pint commission not to exceed four per cent of the actual or proposed cost, s Ariz which shall include payments previously made for preliminary 1 2 , sketches. t Cr ,� 3 For supervision of construction, if the architect is employed the 1 I', • un for that purpose, a commission not to exceed two per cent of the ac- ing g tual cost of the work 1 t3, h, : • } 1 4 If the architect provides engineering or other additional serv- 2 olutu not r I ices beyond his basic architectural services or has reimbursable ex- I (1916 346 - i ; I ;< I Ch. 1 ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS § 34-104 4 - Note 3 _' penses, and when special arrangement has been made in advance t- ,# therefor, he may in addition be reimbursed for such additional serv- il; 1 1 ices or expense as the agent may approve t C. If in the a ent'sjudg ment a satisfactory proposal is not re- ceived for construction of the project completely finished in accord- ance with the accepted plans and specifications, then the architect shall revise the scope or quality of the project, or both, as necessary to obtain a satisfactory proposal to construct the project. e - A e D. If the proposed project is abandoned or suspended for a period ,- of more than one hundred eighty days through no fault of the archi- tect, he shall be compensated upon the percentage provided for in this • section. As amended Laws 1965, Ch 67, § 1 i n 1- Historical Note Source I' § 5, Ch 51, L '19, § 2602, R C '28; _ 9-103,C '39 Library References Municipal Corporations C=226 C J S Municipal Corporations § 976 et seq Notes of Decisions In general 2 Under CI% Code 1901, §3560, providing Abandonment of project 6 that the board of supervisors would se- - Additional services,compensation 8 cure plans and specifications for county Compensation 7, 8 buildings and advertise for same, stating In general 7 the amount of premium to be awarded Additional services 8 to the architect, § 3561, provided that Construction of contracts 3 before an award of a premium to the Proposal or offer 5 architect would be made the board Services, in general 4 would require of him a bond upon cer- E LA Validity i tain conditions, and § 3562, provided , M = that all contracts entered into in viola- _ tion of the last section were null and I. Validity void, the payment to the architect of the /^� State has right to regulate and con- premium before requiring a bond of him trol contracts School Dist No One of was a mere irregularity insufficient to Pima County v. Hastings (1970) 106 show a payment in violation of law, so Ariz 175,472 P 2d 44 that the taxpayer could not recover - therefor. Id. 2. In general Under Civ Code 1901, §§ 3560 to 3562, 3 Construction of contracts the payment to the architect of the pre- Where contract is incompatible with ' mium for plans furnished before requir- statute, statute governs School Dist mg a bond of him is a mere irregulari- No One of Pima County v. Hastings ty, insufficient to show a payment in vi- (1970)106 Ariz 175,472 P 2d 44. F olation of law, so that the taxpayer can- Architect who submitted revised draw- _- not recover therefor. Webster v. Parks ings after bids for construction of (1916)17 Ariz 383,153 P 455 school had been rejected was not enti- 347 - . emr ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES )11) . ITEf1 II MEETING OF (-4 ' ,/ MOTION BY: -.. Y1(\'' SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COW TI MANII4f1IANO COUNCILMAN HILL_ COUNC L TAYLOR J O NC-I- N S HAN KS- OUNCILMAN. STFFLSMITH / MAYOR CLARKE • V UNAN7US IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL V AOW • • • .. > �°`r'.'r3.#.a-f✓-.e- . • • • ITEM NO . 19 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO BEGIN NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE DIRECT SELECTION OF AN ARCHITECT FOR THE NEW CITY LIBRARY . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES l Ut( LH • ITEM 1 # ti MEET I NG OF POTION BY: SECONDED BY : n/61 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V COUNCILMAN HILL 111.1111111111111111 COU1!C I LrAN TAYLOR IIMEMEMEMI CO UNC I LMAN DAM IANO ✓ MAYOR CLARKE UNAN I""OUS I N FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AVM► rank • • • • • - • - .:� -. F .�-k+ a;4* �. sir<,r» .. - - ITEM NO . 20 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON JUNE 18 , 1984 , AT 6): 00 P .M . , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON JUNE 19 , 1984 , AT 6 : 00 P . M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . . ....... rp,C4 HE %.d 34% v*",„ ‘,..2.4 V tY :: z 4'. gRizoNP V'ity o C9419ache ounction May 10, 1984 TO: City Manager THRU: Director of Public Works b „zp FROM: Building Official/Zoning Administrator RE: Building Permit Activity (April, 1984) Attached please find a copy of the Building Permit Activity Report for the month of April, 1984. .•. LF:sr 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY APRIL, 1984 • CUMBER OF VALUE OF LIVING COMMERCIAL NUMBER "TYPE PERMITS ONSTRUCTION UNITS UNITS INSPECTI, ^ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 9 ( 6) 539,632 9 ( 6) 93 350) DUPLEX 6 (--) 607,193 22 (--) 16 (---) -- TRIPLEX 1 (--) 88,274 1 (--) - ( 16) FOURPLEX - ( 2) -- - ( 6) 36 ( 79) APARIMENIS - (--) -- - (--) - (---) MOBILE HOMES 39 (33) 377,336 39 (33) 293 (265) ADON. (R) 6 ( 1) 25,350 - 21 ( 10) AWN. (C) 2 ( 3) 112,464 - 10 ( 40) RES.C/P & GARAGES 2 ( 4) 20,077 - 4 ( 9) OFFICES - (--) j RETAIL STORE 2 (--) 152,855 gtIArrSae & Rental 10 ;436 OTHER COMMERCIAL 2 ( 3) 347,067 1 Rte 61dg p5 5Sg7z 70 ( 27) WhBeM0ands2USsPaaces 101; 00 P AWNINGS 36 (38) 43,008 18 ( 26) POOLS 1 (--) 8,100 3 ( 2) SIGNS 4 ( 2) 8,563 10 ( 1) SHEDS - (--) -- 1 ( 1) JTHER 7 ( 9) 17,312 24 ^'''''' 8) JTHER SHELTER - (--) DEMOLITION (--) ' TOTAL 117 (102) (i;11 (3 71 (47) 599 (834) 1 11 368) OTHER INSPECTIONS 39 __sue �� (LITTER & ZONING) ^-z— TENEWAL5 ( 2) TOTAL 638 DITHORAWN - (--) - • JOID - (--) GRAND TOTAL 117 (104) 'KEY: ( ) = THIS MONTH LAST YEAR PQ ACRE J,, f O U \\........ .IPi .,,,,,, `pity C 94pache 09unction Zo DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 23, 1984 MEMORANDU( 0): THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: A-;40ICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ I (((( ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: U JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find a copy of the Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission from their regular meeting of May 8, 1984. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk' s office. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA MAY 8, 1984 7.00 P M. MINUTES Present Absent Guests Mr. Polomskey Mr. Rogers List of attendees Mrs Conway Mr Vehon in Planning Office Mr Taylor Mr. Sansoni Mr. Sanchez, Chairman Mr McNulty, Acting Planning Director - Mr. Nakagawa, Acting Executive Secretary Mrs LeCount, Recording Secretary Synopsis Agenda dated May 8, 1984 - approved as presented Minutes of April 10, 1984 - approved as presented PZ-35-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 236) - recommended for denial PZ-12-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 267) - recommended for approval PZ-42-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 231) - recommended for approval PZ-13-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 271) - recommended for approval. PZ-15-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 273) - recommended for approval - r -� MC-Z-83-128/129 - recommended for approval to Maricopa County PZ-23-83 (Ordinance No 205) - final Planned Development approval. Public hearing authorized to amend Article XXI, Sections 21 00 and 21 08 of the Zoning Ordinance 1. Chairman after the Pledge of Allegiance was recited, asked the recording secretary to call the roll 2 Mrs. LeCount called the roll and determined that five members were present, with two absent as noted above 3. Chairman noted there was a quorum and called the meeting to order. There being no discussion on the Agenda dated May 8, 1984, he called for a motion. 4. Conway/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated May 8, 1984, be accepted as presented." The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0) 5 Chairman there being no additions, corrections, or deletions to the Minutes dated April 10, 1984, called for a motion. 6. Polomskey/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, `L that the Minutes dated April 10, 1984, be approved as presented " The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0) 7. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-35-83 He noted that this case was continued from the meeting of March 27, 1984. He asked for staff briefing 8 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission stating that the case had been continued to allow the applicant time to explore the possibility of submitting a planned development for the project Amok Aft. Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 He explained that Mr. Anderson wished to pursue the case as a conventional rezoning He added that staff's recommendation would have to remain as a denial since there would be no other way to control the density than by a planned development 9. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case. 10. Howell Anderson stated that he felt he was entitled to a TH 1655 N Ironwood zoning. He added that he had met all the requirements and had 10 acres. He commented that he had his application in before planned development ever existed 11 Chairman explained that he was not in compliance with the General Plan as he was not in line with the density requirements. 12. Mr. Anderson stated that in the event the property was not sold, he would be financially unable to develop the park under a planned development. 13. Mrs. Conway commented that the General Plan was adopted in October, 1982 and that Mr Anderson's application was dated January 24, 1983 14 Chairman asked if anyone would like to speak in favor of a ^_ this request 15. Glenn Pratt said he was the prospective buyer and that he 2555 W Madero, Mesa could not submit a planned development at this time because he did not own the property 16 Chairman explained that the Commission could recommend approval of the request subject to a planned development being submitted with a certain amount of time specified 17. Mr. Taylor was under the impression that Mr. Pratt could act as the owner's agent. ,.. 18. Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. 19 Gene Smith was opposed to the rezoning unless the park 1356 W. Tepee would be fixed up 20. James Corning said he had turned in a protest petition and 1292 W Tepee that the park should be cleaned up. 21. Chairman asked for staff comments 22. Mr Nakagawa stated that conventional TH zoning would exceed the allowable medium density designation and he therefore would have to recommend denial unless the applicant was agreeable to a planned development 23 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 24. Taylor/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-35-83, also knownas Proposed Ordinance No 236, application of Howell and Carolyn Anderson for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 The reason for the recommendation is This rezoning would be in excess of the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction's policy to recommend approval of such rezonings." The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0) 25. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-12-84 a Commission initiated amendment to Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance. He asked for staff briefing. 26 Mr Nakagawa stated that this case was continued from April 10, 1984 to allow the Commission additional time to study the provisions of the new planned development ordinance He gave the recommendations. 27. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for staff recommendation 28. Mr. Nakagawa explained that the proposal before the Commission was an attempt to streamline the Planned Develop- ment process. He said a decision could be made from preliminary planned development proposals and drawings He added that the main feature was to separate out the base zoning procedure from the site plan review procedure He _ commented that since much of the land being purchased in the City is contingent upon a rezoning, and in the interst of equity for the people interested in development, the City should try to have a decision on a rezoning as soon as possible. 29 Mr McNulty handed out calendars to the Commission and explained the time element involved in the present and proposed process 30. Commission discussion with Mr McNulty on the processes and if quality was being sacrificed to save time. 31 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion/', 32. Sansoni/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Ordinance No 267, 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING 'THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE,' BY AMENDING 'ARTICLE XXXIII, SECTION 33.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT'; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY,' be recommended to the Apache Junction City Council for approval with the following amendments 1. Section 33 04 (2c) to read as follows 'Preliminary architectural elevations and/or perspectives necessary to demonstrate the design and character of the proposed development.' 2 Section 33 04 (2c) - 'Other relevant data ..' should be listed as item (2d). Ink Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 3 Section 33 06 (2c) to read as follows 'Buildings, walls, and trailer units shall be located in such a manner so as to avoid a corridor, tunnel, linear, or barracks-like effect.' 4 Section 33.06 (2c) and (2d) become (2d) and (2e) /mmk 5. Section 33 03 (3d) should read- 'Approval shall be valid for one year or for the period given in the approved schedule of development ' eliminating the first sentence " The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0). 33 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-42-83, a request for rezoning from GR to TH/PD. He asked for staff briefing. 34. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case • 35 Chairman asked if the applicant was present to speak on the case. 36. Gary Nine stated that the project was located in a mobile 695 W. 17th Ave. park area and that all the necessaryinformation ; for a preliminary planned development has been submitted He felt this project would be of an extremely high quality. 37. Mrs Conwaysked if thepark wasgoingto Y be for adults or family. 38. Mr Nine replied it would be for adults. 39 Mr. Sansoni asked Mr. Nine to explain the drainageway. 40. Mr Nine outline the drainageway location on the map 41 Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of this application. 42 Ken Ragan stated that he owned property at Lost Dutchman and Idaho and that it would be a great asset to Idaho Road to have one development in opposed to five or six parks 43. Chairman there being no one else to speak in favor and no one to speak in opposition, he asked for staff recommendation. 44. Mr Nakagawa said that the proposed density would comply with the General Plan designation. He said that the companion preliminary plat, SD-11-83, may be approved by the Subdivision Committee pending the { assured water supply designation of the water Il company and that final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways He then recommended some stipulations. 45 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 46. Polomskey/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-42-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 231, application of Gary Nine representing several property owners for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to /"*. the Apache Junction City Council the approval of Il said application Any stipulations of recommendations are 1 Final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways 2. The perimeter wall shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department so as to provide variety by recessing the wall at various intervals, varying the heiaht, incorporating landscaping, or some similar means 3. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Department. 4. Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide. 5 The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits The reasons for this recommendation are- 1. It complies with Section 33 09 of the City's Zoning Ordinance 2. It is the highest and best use of the land 3 It complies with the General Plan's high density designation " The motion passed 4-1-0, with Mrs. Conway dissenting. 47. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-13-84, a rezoning request by Harvey and Shirley Weeks to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence. He asked for staff briefing 48 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case He added that the Commission had authorized a Commission Initiative at their meeting of March 27, 1984 49. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 50. Keith Stachar represented the owners. He said they would like 28 N Ironwood to develop the property into a condominium project as they felt it was a very good location. He stated that because of the groundwater situation, they will probably start out as an apartment complex 51 Mr Sansoni asked if it would be open to families. 52. Mr. Stachar replied it would be, but not large ones. oik Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 53 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for staff comments. 54. Mr. Nakagawa stated that this rezoning would be consistent with the General Plan designation He recommended stipulations of roadway dedications 55 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 56. Conway/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning f Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-13-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 271, application of Harvey and Shirley Weeks for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recommendations are The applicant dedicate the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes s ,. x The reason for this recommendation is According to the General Plan, it is the best use for the land." The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0). 57 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-15-84, a rezoning from GR to CB-2 He asked for staff briefing. 58 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 59. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case. 60 Donald Cox stated that he and his wife have owned the property 12423 E. Doubletree for about 30 years and he was thinking of retiring Scottsdale and starting some sort of business He said he did not have anything definite in mind at this time 61 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for staff recommendation 62 Mr Nakagawa stated that this rezoning would be consistent with the General Plan designation He recommended stipulations for roadway dedications _ 63. Mr Sansoni commented that when the application had been submitted it said they planned to start a plant nursery on the property ( 64 Mr Cox said that was one of the businesses they had in mind. 65. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 66 Taylor/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-15-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 273, application of Donald and Catherine Cox for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, Page Seven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33' ) the west thirty-three feet (33'), and the south fifty feet (50') of the subject ^ property for public roadway and associated purposes The reasons for the recommendation are. 1 This rezoning would comply with the General Plan of Apache Junction 2 It is the best use of the property " The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0). 67 Chairman after a 5-minute recess, the meeting resumed at 8 38 p.m. He asked Mr Nakagawa if he had any announcements under Communications, Awards, or Presentations. 68 Mr Nakagawa stated that there would be a public meeting sponsored by the Arizona Department of Transportation on May 16, 1984, in the City Council Chambers, at 7 00 p m in regards to the Superstition Freeway Extension with some ADOT officials present. 69. Chairman asked for staff briefing on the two Maricopa County referrals, MC-Z-83-128 and PMC-Z-83-129. 70. Mr. Nakagawa stated that these two projects, Four Peaks R V Resort, and University Park Estates, are to be built side by side - mobile park to the west and RV park to the east He said there will be about 1,432 RV spaces and 425 mobile home spaces. He said that the DCC had no objections with some stipulations He added that the main issue with this project is the size and that the Planning ems Department is concerned about what affect a project of this size would have on the character of a community as small as Apache Junction 71 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 72 Robert Child stated that he had discussed the wall with Mr 1001 E. Gemini Dr Nakagawa which is a major concern and that the Tempe projects are two different projects and the fencing on them would not likely be the same He spoke briefly on the retention area He added that they would be holding 15 acres on the south end for possible future commercial develop- ment 73 Mr. Polomskey asked what type of sewage system would be used and where the exit would be 74 Mr Child replied that they would be using septics and that there would be an exit for the RV park on the north end of the project on Meridian, with a secondary exit on Adobe He added that the primary exit for the mobile home park would be about a block and a half east of Mountain Road onto University Drive 75 Mrs Conway asked if they would be for sale or rentals Page Eight - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 76. Mr. Child replied that they would be rentals. 77 Ron Thayer explained what they intend to do with the 15 902 N. Val Vista, Mesa acres to the south which would be Phase II and planned for 1985. He commented that they had satisfied all of Maricopa County's requirements, and that they had received a letter from the Apache Junction Fire Department offering to supply /imk, security for their park 78. Mr. Nakagawa asked if Marciopa County had the same type of setbacks as the City. 79. Doug McGillivray replied that he assumed so. 2923 S Extension, Mesa 80. Mr. Thayer after some discussion, apologized for misleading the Commission by stating that he had gotten a letter from the Apache Junction Fire Department offering to supply security service for their park. He said it must have been the Rural Metro Fire Department that was in the security business 81. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for staff recommendations 82. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Planning Department would like to get involved in the final plan review stage -`° 83. Chairman called for a motion on both cases 84 Taylor/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Commission recommends to Maricopa County the approval of case MC-Z-83-128 and MC-Z-83-129 to permit a travel trailer park and a mobile home park as special uses in the Rural-43 zoning district. The following conditions are requested: 1. The applicant dedicate the required right-of-way. Assak 2. The applicant install off-site improvements 3. Provisions for drainage be made 4. The perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals, that the height of the wall be alternated and that landscaping along the street frontages consist of naturalizing vegetation. 5 20' x 20' cut-offs be provided at each corner. 6. Final development plans be referred to the City of Apache Junction Planning Department for review and comment. The reasons for the recommendation are: 1. The park would comply with the basic usage for that area west of Apache Junction. 2. It is the best use of that property." The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0) 85. Chairman said the next item on the Agenda was under Old Business, PZ-23-83, Ordinance No 205 He asked for staff briefing IOW%. f Page Nine - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 86. Mr Nakagawa stated that PZ-23-83 is being heard tonight for final planned development approval, and that it was approved by the City Council on November 1, 1983 He said it is a 22 5 acre, 225 lot travel trailer resort known as Superstition Mountain Resort. He said that the wall of this project has already been built and they are now applying to the City for building permits to contruct the remainder of the project He added that the DCC did notobject to the request provided that the City Engineer's and City building requirements are satisfied prior to the issuance of building permits. He commented that the building plans are in the Zoning Administrator's office and that the City Engineer has the off-site plans 87 Mrs Conway asked how she was supposed to approve something she could not see since they did not have any plans for the Commission to review. 88. Mr Nakagawa replied that is one of the awkward features of the existing Planned Development Ordinance He said they just had to be sure that the preliminary PD had been turned in which was done last year He said most of the other Planned Developments were approved with the conditions asked for here. 89 Commission discussion. 90 Chairman called for a motion. 91. Polomskey/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the request of W&S Properties for final planned development approval for PZ-23-83, Ordinance No. 205, be approved Any stipulations or recommendations are That all City engineering and City building requirements be satisfied prior to the issuance of building permits The reason for this approval is: The City Building Official has determined that the final plans are in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plans " The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0). 92. Chairman said the next item on the Agenda was under New Business, a request for a Commission Initiative to amend Article XXI, Section 21 00 and 21.08 to the Zoning Ordinance relating to minimum standards for interior or private streets in any type of development He asked for staff briefing. 93 Mr. Nakagawa explained that the Fire Department appeared before the City Council and asked for a Commission initiativeto establish a minimum street width for RV and mobile home parks to a width of 28 feet. He added that what was overlooked at that time was their intent was also to include apartment type complexes, condos, townhouses, and private streets with single family housing projects He said that it is the intent of this proposed amendment to include what was previously left out Allikk p I Page Ten - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 8, 1984 94. Chairman called for a motion 95 Sansoni/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that a Commission Initiative to establish minimum standards for interior or private streets in any type of development is hereby authorized ,. and shall be advertised for June 12, 1984, at 7:00 p m , before the Commission in these City Council Chambers " /rek The motion passed unanimously (5-0-0). 96 Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak under Call to the Public. 97 Dean Rhodes introduced himself as the new reporter for the Apache Junction News. 98 Chairman welcomed him to the meeting There being no further business, called for a motion to adjourn. 99. Conway/Taylor M/S to adjourn The meeting adjourned at 9 30 p m Recorded and transcribed by - .A44"�' z-- a' % , cki LeCount, Recording Secretary Respectfully submitted t C L'S James A Nakagawa, ng Executive Secretary ,O1 APPROVED: t1, L%i /;7', Ken Sanchez, Chairman Planning and Zoning Co scion pocHE ti O � n O U t ' � Z qR P `Oily a &pache ciunc1ian izoN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 9, 1984 MEMORANDUM T • THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ,4MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER/ ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached is a copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of April 10, 1984. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's office. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 Al .4011\ r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA APRIL 10, 1984 7:00 P.M. MINUTES Present Absent Guests Amok Mr Polomskey Mr. Rogers List of attendees Mrs. Conway in Planning Office. Mr. Taylor Mr. Sansoni Mr Vehon Mr. Sanchez, Chairman Mr. McNulty, Acting Planning Director Mr Nakagawa, Acting Executive Secretary Mrs. Samuelson, Recording Secretary Synopsis Agenda dated April 10, 1984 - approved as amended. Minutes of March 27, 1984 - approved as presented PZ-5-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 258) - recommended for approval to CB-1. PZ-1-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 252) - recommended for approval. PZ-10-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 263) - recommended for approval. PZ-11-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 264) - recommended for approval Agenda dated April 10, 1984 - amended and approved PZ-14-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 272) - Commission Initiative authorized. PZ-12-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 267) - postponed to May 8, 1984 meeting April 24, 1984 meeting cancelled 1. Chairman after Ple dge edge of Allegiance was recited, asked the recording secretary to call the roll 2. Mrs. Samuelson called the roll and determined that six members were present with one absent, as noted above. /'rk 3. Chairman noted there was a quorum and called the meeting to order. He acknowledged the presence of Councilman Steelsmith He asked if there were any additions or deletions to the Agenda dated April 10, 1984 4. Mrs Conway stated she would like to add Item #9 under New Business which would read, "Motion to cancel April 24, 1984 meeting " 5. Chairman there being no further additions, called for a motion. 6. Conway/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated April 10, 1984 be accepted as presented with the addition of Item #9, 'Motion to cancel April 24, 1984 meeting I" The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0). 7 Chairman there being no additions, corrections, or deletions to the Minutes dated March 27, 1984, called for a motion 8 Vehon/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated March 27, 1984, be approved as presented " The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) } Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 9. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-5-84 and asked for staff briefing. 10. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission stating that this case had been continued from the meeting of March 27, 1984 to allow time for the applicant to consider a PD and to allow the church to see if a CB-1 zoning would be acceptable. Amok 11 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case. 12 Bill Warin stated that he had considered the possibility Y 1548 E Hale, Mesa of going PD or CB-1 zoning and that he would like to amend his application and ask for CB-1 zoning on the property 13. Chairman asked if he was requesting that the CB-1 zoning amendment was for the entire application 14 Mr Warin replied that it was. 15 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for staff comments 16. Mr Nakagawa said there was no objection to the amendment request, which would also be in conformance with the General Plan He recommended stipulating dedication of rights-of-way, if not already dedicated. 17. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 18. Vehon/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-5-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 258, application of ICAM Properties and Clara Carney for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations or recommendationsare• The applicant dedicate the east forty feet (40') of Parcel No. 1 and the west forty feet (40') of Parcel No 2 for public roadway and associated purposes, if not already dedicated. "The reasons for this recommendation are 1 This rezoning would be in compliance with the City's General Plan 2. This rezoning would serve as a good transition between existing CB-2 zoning along the highway and the residential zoning to the south " The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0). 19. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-1-84, rezoning from GR to TH/PD in Section 29, and asked for staff briefing 20. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case Ask oink Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 21. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 22 Marty Jones represented the applicants He showed the 2333 N. Central, Phx proposed site plan for the extension of Phase I and explained some minor changes 23. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for staff comments Amok 24 Mr. Nakagawa stated that this would conform to the medium density designation He said there was a protest petition on file, but no signers were within 150' of the project 25. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 26. Polomskey/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-1-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 252, application of Kenneth Bakke and Michael Purcell for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations or recommendations are 1. That final plat approval will be required prior to final PD approval in order for the City to obtain dedicated roadways 2 The perimeter wall be recessed additionally at locations where existing washes enter and exit the site 3. The applicant submit a report from the State Health Department for approval of the sewage plant in Phase I to handle the additional flow from Phase II 4 The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and Fire Department. 5 Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide. 6 The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits "The reasons for this recommendation are 1. The request conforms with Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. It complies with the General Plan medium density designation 3 It is compatible with the surrounding area " The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 27 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-10-84, rezoning from GR to CB-2 and TH in Section 20, and asked for staff briefing 28 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case / Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 29. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 30 Marty Jones outlined the history behind this rezoning case He showed a plan for the development and presented a plan for 4th Avenue, and said the entrance to the park would be on 4th Avenue * 31. Mr. McNulty stated that this was the first time the City had seen the plan and was not prepared to ,,y (._ comment on it or to accept it He added that 4th Avenue should go all the way through. 32 Mr Jones stated that his clients were willing to put it all the way through, but that the present plan was to accomodate the neighbors who did not want it to go through 33. Mr. McNulty commented that the area cannot be developed until this matter is resolved He added that they are considering only the rezoning tonight 34. Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor 35. Bill Plum said he was neither in favor or opposed. He 638 S Silver said that he would like to see what type of privacy wall would be utilized and that he would like to see the property developed. 36 Chairman there being no one to speak in opposition, he ~°'--' - - ..-`_. asked for staff comments. 37 Mr Nakagawa stated there was no objection and recommended stipulating dedication of rights-of-way 38. Chairman commented that once the zoning was granted there was no guarantee unless it was a PD He asked - if the applicants would be willing to go PD 39 Mr Jones replied that the area would not comply with the PD Ordinance and that the applicants have been in this process for at least a year He said the Commission could put stipulations to the site plan. ,mom 40. Chairman closed the public hearing 41 Mr Taylor asked if they could make stipulations 42. Mr. McNulty replied they could and that they could also add a reverter. 43 Mr Vehon asked why a reverter and if there were stipulations if they go with the zoning with any owner He said he felt this would be a good buffer and was not in favor of a reverter. 44 Mr Nakagawa stated that the building and development plans were subject to the Building Official and City Engineer's approval I_ 45 Chairman after a brief discussion on stipulations, called for a motion. 46. Taylor/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-10-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 263, application of Donna and Robert Loewenstein for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting A i Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone and Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations or recommendations are 1 The applicant dedicate the west fifty feet (50') and the south fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and a sixty foot (60') right-of-way for the West Fourth Avenue alignment 2 In the TH section of the rezoning, the applicant will construct and enclose the area with a six foot (6') masonry wall. 3. The maximum units to be placed on the TH zoning will be 72 units "The reasons for this recommendation are 1 The basic rezoning is compatible with the General Plan. 2. It will act as a buffer with Ironwood and the residential area to the east " 47. Mrs Conway made an amendment to the motion to add a one-year reverter clause which died for lack of a second The main motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 48 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-11-84, rezoning from GR to TH in Section 18, and asked for staff briefing. 49. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 50 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 51. Guy Ridenhour stated he wanted to have a place for his mother- 1975 W Shiprock in-law to live 52. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for staff comments 53. Mr. Nakagawa said that this rezoning would be consistent with the medium/high density opportunity General Plan designation for the site He recommended stipulating dedication of right-of-way. 54 Chairman asked how many units could be placed on this site. 55. Mr. Nakagawa replied that there could be three maximum now fif it is lot split. {_ 56. Mr. Ridenhour stated he did not anticipate putting in any- more trailers, but that a neighbor had been rezoned and he had put in four trailers on 1/ acre site, so if he wanted to do it too, he would 57 Mr Nakagawa commented that the neighbor would have to answer to the Zoning Administrator as to why he's running a mobile home park He stated that one owner can split into three parcels, and then the next owner can split, but that one owner cannot split the property into four parcels Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 58. Mr. Ridenhour asked how many units he could have per acre 59 Mr. McNulty replied that if he rented lots, he could not rent four because that would make it a trailer park. He added that he could legally sell three lots before it would be considered subdividing. ,41\ 60. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 61 Taylor/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-11-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 264, application of Guy and Dorothy Ridenhour for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the north thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes "The reasons for this recommendation are- 1. The rezoning does comply with the General Plan of Apache Junction 2. It is compatible with the surrounding area " The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 62. Mr. McNulty suggested that since there were so few people left in the audience that the item under New Business be covered prior to the next case which was a requested amendment to the Planned Development section of the Zoning Ordinance 63 Sansoni/Conway M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Item #8 under New Business be switched with Item #7 on the Agenda." The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 64. Chairman stated that Item #7 was PZ-14-84, a request for a Commission Initiative to rezone from GR to CR-3 in Section 20, and asked for staff briefing. 65. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 66 Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case. 67. William Wylie was representing the Freemans who went back 2743 W. Ohio east for the summer He said they want to put slump block around the mobile but it is setback only 38' and they need 40' He added that it will improve the looks of the property 68. Chairman called for a motion. Auk Page Seven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 69. Polomskey/Vehon M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that pursuant to Section 2802 of the Zoning Ordinance, a public hearing for a Commission initiated zone change from GR General Rural to CR-3 Single Residence as requested by Bernard and Ruth Freeman in case number PZ-14-84 for their property described as 'ark Lot 2, Bixville Homes Subdivision, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, is hereby authorized. "Stipulations are: The applicant submit the required zoning materials " The reasons for this authorization are- The request is in compliance with Section 2802 of the Zoning Ordinance." The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 70. Chairman resumed the meeting at 8.46 p.m. after a 5-minute recess He asked for staff briefing on PZ-12-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 267. 71 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission stating that this was a Commission-initiated amendment to Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance dealing with procedures and requirements for Planned Developments He gave the staff comments and suggested some additions and changes to the proposed Ordinance 72 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for comments 73 Mr McNulty stated that this will shorten the process He said that the existing Ordinance has about one year of staff time, and that this will have Amok about three to four months of staff time 74. Mrs. Conway did not feel that she had been given enough time to study this She said she would like to compare this to the drafts from the Rewrite Committee and would like to postpone the hearing until May 8, 1984. 75. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Rewrite Committee version was passed out a few weeks ago He said that some information had been combined and some had been deferred to another stage 76. Chairman called for a motion. 77. Conway/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that PZ-12-84, Proposed Ordinance No 267, be postponed to the Commission meeting of May 8, 1984, at 7.00 p.m., in these Chambers for further study." The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 78 Chairman said the next item on the Agenda was under New Business, Motion to Cancel April 24, 1984 meeting Page Eight - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 79 Polomskey/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the meeting scheduled for April 24, 1982 be cancelled with the next scheduled meeting being on May 8, 1984, at 7 00 p m , in these Chambers." The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0). 80. Chairman there being no one to speak under Call to "oak the Public and no further business, called for a motion to adjourn. 81. Taylor/Conway M/S to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9 00 p m Recorded and transcribed by Marge am elon, Recording Secretary Respectfully submitted, James A. akagawa, Acti g xecutive Secretary APPROVED: te141. Ken Sanchez hairman Planning and Zoning Commi ion /11.\ r ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r 9 r td=57/P/ ITEM # k / MEETING OF / - l . vyyL,/, MOTION BY : SECONDED BY' /S/6 )112 YES NO ABSTAINED ,•. t NCILMAN. STEELSMITH NCILMAN TAYLOR v • NCILMAN HTI L .COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL • • .. ..: :..t T `--'?F- ^"-'.�07s'FA na'�v x3.'�"W4'SFra1•�.'�J. i �S�E+`4Y v�' .�'7flw � v'°-, i , -:_S,r K.: , -1 iliTum..g..I ITEM NO . 22 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P .M . - iv';,e/dtgV ROLL CALL tifro tfiel (OSA! ROLL CALL IP ESENT 1 ABSENT C MAYOR GLARKE f f w.s. VICE-f1AY0R, EIDSON ! / I/ ' I COUNCILMAN HILL ! / I COUNCILMAN TAYLOR / / ! COUNCILMAN SF VNKS ! f / ✓ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ✓ / COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ! / ✓� IL TOTAL 1 5x5- c9-' c2—' STAFF PRESENT W.S. CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY ' //7 * CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly / I.FINANCE CONTROLLER KeithC.Vta..c_de:, Lewis 0L, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 1.✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel ,-------- . ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman v CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch ! b6- 1/L ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph ✓ // ./ . CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 14 � c2 44, DATE: �'-S op2/ ADDRESS: ,� �,�j / £i /C C� ‘<itC) AGENDA ITEM: Crd !�