HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 08.10 PRC MinutesCITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
1001 N.Idaho Rd.
Apache Junction,Arizona
SPECIAL MEETING
August 10,1982
A Special Meeting of the Apache Junction Parks and Recreation Commission
was held on August 10,1982 at 7:00 at the Apache Junction Community Service
building pursuant to notice as prescribed by law.
PRESENT ABSENT
Lois Broman Ronald Staples
Harvey Long Margaret Carlin
Janice Palson
Michael Carden
Hedy Hall
Irene Wernett
Chuck Heermans
STAFF PRESENT:Jeff Bell,Community Services Superintendent
CALL TO ORDER:
SWIMMING POOL:
Harvey Long,Chairman,lead an open
discussion concerning the swimming pool.
Priority was given to information to be
presented to the City Council at the August 16
joint Study Session.
Chuck Heermans read the minutes from the
August 6 Jay Cees meeting.The meeting
centered on community and business involvement
in the Swimming Pool project.The initial
meeting was considered successful with a
number of committees established.Mr.
Heermans suggested that the City Council be
informed of the community interest and
involvement.
Chuck Heermans asked the Committee for their
opinions on the use of volunteers in the
pool construction.Committee members
suggested volunteers be used for unskilled
duties with use of a contractor for
actual pool construction.
Jeff Bell suggested the possibility of a
qualified supervisor to oversee a group of
volunteers.Chuck Heermans questioned
checking with pool contractors to investigate
the feasibility of such an idea.
Hedy Hall suggested a poll be taken among
citizens questioning the bond issue,pool
construction volunteers and alternatives to
cutting construction costs.
Harvey Long suggested that Michael Carden
be spokesman for the City Council joint
Study Session.He also suggested that Chuck
Heermans brief the City Council on the Jay
Cees progress.
P &R Commission
Special Meeting
August 10,1982
page 2
ADJOURNMENT:
APPROVED:
Lois Broman made a motion that staff do a
study plan on the Swimming Pool.The plan
divided into four phases,would be investigated
and reported on to the Parks and Recreation
Commission at appropriate times.The motion
was seconded by Michael Carden and passed
unanimously.The plan is as follows:
Phase I 1)Alternative site locations
2)Alternative pool specifications
3)Alternative site plans (bath houses,
parking,restrooms,etc.)
4)Utility availability and
extentions (water,septic,electric,
gas,phone)
5)Land acquisition costs
6)Inter -governmental agreement
alternatives (school,Pinal County,
Maricopa County,grants available,
AORCC,CDBG,etc.)
Phase I I Review by Parks and Recreation Commissior
1)Consolidation of alternatives for
preliminary site selection
and site development plan
2)Final cost estimate
Phase III Investigate alternative financing
methods.Present to bonding
consultant for optional bonding
methods and costs to the community.
Phase IV Prepare petitiOns:116r .community interest ,
General questions were asked and discussed
by the Commission concerning the study plan
phases.
Motion was made to adjourn by Michael Carden.
Motion seconded by Irene Wernett and passed
unanimously.