Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 09.18 City Council Regular Agenda z .41,9i o' AN itz o ache unction CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 7: 00 P.M. 6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (if required) 6: 00 P.M. WORK SESSION (if required) CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Proposed Ordinance No. 246 , PZ-52-83, Application by Weitkamp Corp. , Ruth Samborski , and Herbert Miller through G. Brent Teeples to rezone 14. 82 acre parcel, located between Meridian and Warner Drives and Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Windsong Street in Section 18 from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development . B. Proposed Ordinance No. 297, PZ-35-84, Application by Richard Herbert , American Business Corp. , Albert and Thomas Meaker , and William Murphy to rezone a 4. 6 acre parcel, located on the southwest corner of Broadway and San Marcos Drive in Section 29, from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone. C. Proposed Ordinance No. 299, PZ-37-84, Application by Verne Graves to rezone 5 acre parcel, located on east side of Cactus Road , 300 feet south of Scenic Street in Section 21, from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . D. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of September 4, 1984 001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED GUESTS AND VISITORS AWARDS , PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217 , PZ-30-83, Application by Greg Hamblin of Hamblin Diversified to rezone a 4 acre parcel , from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD and a 39, 000 square foot parcel from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5 , located between Plaza and Monterey Drives , 120 feet north of 20th Avenue. (First Reading) (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303 , PZ-40-84, Application by David and Lauretta Druckman through Mike Kovacs to rezone a 3 .4 acre parcel, located on southwest side of Highway 60, about 600 feet west of Cortez Road in Section 27, from Trailer Homesite (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone. (First Reading) (5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304, PZ-41-84, Application by Robert Christensen and Ronald and Anna May Williams to rezone a 2 acre parcel, located at northeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 , from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) (6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 305 , PZ-42-84, Application by Ronald and Anna May Williams through Keith Stachar to rezone a 57, 000 square foot parcel, located at southeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 , from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) (7) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 306 , PZ-43-84, Application by Frank Talbot to rezone a 1 . 25 acre parcel, located at northwest corner of Smoketree Street and Grand Drive in Section 18, from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) OLD BUSINESS (8) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 289, PZ-31-84, Application by Dunrite Asphalt , Inc. , through Bob Cosby to rezone a 12 acre parcel, located on southwest side of Highway 60, 800 feet northwest of Tomahawk Road in Section 28, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone . (Second Reading) (Postponed Item) (9) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288, PZ-29-84, Application by A. Richard and Jennie Damiano to rezone 4. 15 acre parcel, located at the southeast corner of Highway 88 and E. Hidalgo Street in Section 15 , from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. (Second Reading) (10) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 298, PZ-36-84, Application by Duane Beeman and Cleo Johnson of D & C Development through Keith Stachar to rezone . 95 acre parcel , located on the southeast corner of Roosevelt Street and Ironwood Drive in Section 20, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. (Second Reading) (11) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 300, PZ-38-84, Application by Roy and Norma Hudson to rezone 1 . 5 acre parcel, located on southwest corner of Ironwood Drive and Broadway Avenue in Section 30, from CR-3 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. (Second Reading) (12) APPOINTMENT TO SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE AND/OR ANNEXATION COMMITTEE (13) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 83-18, AB-83-7, BARBER, KOERNER, HAAS, LAABS , JONES , SIERRA ENTERPRISES INC. , POLEGA, ARMSBY AND YEAGER (Postponed Item) (14) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-50, AB-83-7 , HAAS AND YEAGER (Postponed Item) NEW BUSINESS (15) TIME EXTENSION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ORDINANCE NO. 55 , PZ-7-79, SCHUSTER (16) TIME EXTENSION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ORDINANCE NO. 56, PZ-12-79, LAWTHER (17) REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE, APACHE JUNCTION REACH OUT, INC. (18) AWARD OF BIDS FOR PHASE I , STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (19) AUTHORIZATION FOR ENGINEER CONSULTANTS FOR PHASE II , STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (20) SELECTION OF ARCHITECT FOR CITY LIBRARY (21) WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 15 , 1984 O.•. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 16, 1984 CALL TO THE PUBLIC (22) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (23) ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS . " ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ....... ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : rh.ii-i ` SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTDSON / rnI If�,r T l r9�N CT�FI CM T TN /\ COUNCILMAN N TAYLOR ✓+ COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS V �OUNCILMAN DAMIANO T UNANI".. US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 4111"71- ITEM NO. 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. em: 1f z c`Dit v 04)9 ache 2unctivn gR�Z��yP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 15, 1984 Approver for Agenda D•te Item # First Reading Second Reading , 'L MEMORANDUM T,QnTHE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Public Hearing Old Business THROUGH: ,J1ICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER New Business Consent Agenda FROM: - CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Lt- SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-52-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 246) SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-52-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 246, is a request by the applicants Weitkamp Corp. , Ruth Samborski , and Herbert Miller through G. Brent Teeples to rezone their property from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development. The site is a vacant 14.82 acre parcel located between Meridian and Warner Drives and Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Windsong Street in Section 18. It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land, houses, and a horse stable. Planning Department Comments The staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of Lost Dutchman Boulevard, Windsong Street, Meridian and Warner Drives fronting the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and the dedication of twenty feet (20' ) by twenty feet (20' ) cut-offs on all property corners located at the intersection of two public or private roadways, and the abandonment of Cedar Drive prior to City Council approval of the rezoning. The applicant intends to develop the property as an RV rental park and then apply for Subdivision approval later when the Arizona Water Company is designated as having an assured water supply. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE1602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-52-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 246) August 15, 1984 Page Two The subject property is located in an area designated as Residential- Medium/High Density Opportunity Area. The applicant first came before the Commission on July 10, 1984 requesting TH zoning. The Commission requested that the applicant submit his request as a Planned Development • which you are considering tonight. The DCC had no objections to the concept plan that was submitted July 17, 1984. The applicant's engineer will have to include a number of additional items for preliminary plan consideration and plat approval . Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 14, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Tepolt/Taylor 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-52-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 246, application of Weitkamp Corp. , Ruth Samborski , and Hubert Miller through G. Brent Teeples for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate Lost Dutchman Boulevard, Windsong Street, Meridian and Warner Drives fronting the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and the dedication of 20' by 20' cut-offs on all property corners located at the intersection of two public or private roadways. 2. The abandonment of Cedar Drive prior to City Council approval of this rezoning. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It is consistent with the General Plan designation for the site. 2. It is the best use of the property. 3. It would be in compliance with all six items of Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance. " CRN:mas - ; "" ;;""'K`'- PZ-52-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 246 PROPOSED EZGNE FROR GR GENERAL RURAL --_ z - TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ^ . .. ---- : - r'-r- - ^_ B g 1 F�'.�+)I9 .roads X. _ - 1 • � ` ELM I STATE ! STATEi STATE LAND ' LAND I LAND -I' T --r - rjr,t. ',A.At 1T�•Rr!�' M 'v., , +7:.-- A%`.�4.:'0:44;..6L;r '_..,+2�"4'13! 's i7$ :r7''; it AI wilr AI I • V �.: 1 ,fit = o *;1 CR-5 I _ = c� :I • : i - Ia -- -ram . ib _ I . - let ' WEST FOOTHILL. SIREET 1111 }/ SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1 = 400' F LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) drolnir ORDINANCE NO. 246 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-52-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL 1 The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as- Lots 5, 7, and 8 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development 2 The approval of the zoning district classification shall be construed as only concept approval for the base zoning and shall serve as official approval of the base zoning amendment to the Zoning Map. 3 Development of said property shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance. The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes, policies, guides, and detailed standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improvements. 4 Applicant shall dedicate all rights-of-way and easements as required by the City prior to final plan approval SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST- Kathleen Connelly City Clerk war �r--� IN ft, In Pk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ormk D vi xan r City ttorney I 11'84. I ORDINANCE NO 246 PAGE TWO OF TWO 3 PZ-52-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 246 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT I BLM STATE STATE STATE LAND LAND LAND WFST I OST D .ue► I .41:� F W CC Q A j Z Z o ¢ ' 11 ► S U f ,1 1 Q l'c;-L'I o i--i 1 CR5 � � '. L.) Q ill' WEST FOOTHILL STREET ` SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 400' j i LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) (ryACHE✓G y 4e U1 ii Z 'IR/ZOO' CDity et- c 4ache c 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 15, 1984 Approver for Agenda Ye _Oat: Item # First Reading ,,�� Sacond Reading lt. 1417 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL public Hearing THROUGH: ' jMICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER old Business New Business FROM: A, CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ✓Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-35-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 297) SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-35-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 297, is a request by the applicants Richard Herbert, American Business Corp. , Albert and Thomas Meaker, and William Murphy to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone. The site is a vacant 4.6 acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Broadway and San Marcos Drive in Section 29. It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include RV parks and vacant .••. land. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting it would be consistent with the Local Commercial Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north fifty feet (50' ) and the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, if not already dedicated. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 14, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Rogers/Jorgensen 7-0-0) 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 ,.. ^ The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-35-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 297) August 15, 1984 Page Two "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-35-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 297, application of Richard Herbert, American Business Corp. , Albert and Thomas Meaker, and William Murphy for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the north fifty feet (50' ) and the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, if not already dedicated. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It complies with the General Plan. 2. It is a good use for the property." CRN:mas —.- , ..-.....,—...—...--,...- ..... .7,---- ___.— - - -. . , • ,•.,, .,, . . - ,,..,-4,,eNt•••?..-,::.•.ki•-Nr.*:-_,4-;:-.--•.--..---,.,•-:5,.::::.,:,7,:.,:,:.:. • •=.- :. --.•,---„,7_-,-::•.,-,-, , ,.. " • • .• - • . , •-. . , -.'.,...- -;:,..?.....f!:- ,- ,,'•: . :----,,,:--•,-" ,..4.-ii.-- ,0„-.. i...F.4.. -Att•ii.,...4-4,4„.•-f,,,,,,,,..-..-_..,-,••=1 i --7--; • _ , PZ-35-84 e--•-"----..e.k... ...-,.-------:;•••,--_,,,.;-7--.,-•:--E.:--,-.,---,,-:)--:,,,.. -41,-,-,--_,--,-•.--14-.71-7,"---=-- .,12:.1•••=i;,--•,:-:-!--: g"---'..:j,7- -2:i- -7-7.;-:-.,_:-:-' : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 297 -.... -.-4-:: . . r.t......,`;'-,,,pistrriii;:,402 .,:+5.::...%"*.$,":.-:.?:•':-.7,-S.:7,-"tt;e7- 4 -..•-'.t.:*.- -.•-!....".•.: - ‘..%:-..5-,:r;-.-"7:;'4.:-..;::f.;.-,•.' ' . • .4i . . I - .•••• •..•:•;:';s7:''''•:r''-'1,15.•.t.7••-•,..7•'--4'-'-`-‘2•='•---r - , • - , -.....“.7.7.5.4.- "*7:- ..;.`",`'''• .--',,--:'r,' PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE .-:;,:mv-z•r!.:0--.. ..,-,* .. . •......0,,fw- ,„_ Aosi.,,i......„,.-,-7,_,,,,,r,..-;_•_.......... --,--_---,•,:::.,-- --...,:''.... "'"';_-..': FT - -- ----'•'',.`•:•:*,-.44.1WK::-•;--•;.-'4*-....r r:-..! , _ _ _t4•M•"1•=,..t;;.-i•---±I'::-.;-,,-4-1-,,,,,,...,..,k.-.,-.,-,•,..,,,,•. . .. .sto_lymittoi..040. $•*i4r40-i*"..*I. ,01 / ..r ..,.__._.•_.,..„' —'::::;,..r....• ......,!.2,-,,,,,A.73,,,I,:L,,:•-r::i.-1 .-_. ,-..--.^-.--,-..-..--4';:r';':1.7-•:,•--.17':',-,:t•:•,',:..,:".,- .'":5,-:',:--71,-“ ' . ,101F6Ligel -:5 ii4k'..Z.-10.--";tr::ti7-;;-4;t:7•:',:',:i-:;;•'•-•-z:.27.".7 '::,,t•kt.-- .-. z;.•••-•7---;•iv,75:•,..-7,..:,--;:.iv---vc.,:•„•,--‹.-•,,i:::. •-,-,._.,.--....-....._-_ • -- ----,------',----,-"=.17‘. ,..:-,•,-!6--s,-..,,.!---..••.-....-....,....„.; _ 1 _•-_—---_____________I 7_ I I -,-,-----....-r-l_utz-..*:-.,,..--,,,,,•&,;,-43‘.•:;:-.1,,,c4-4*.c,„-::;:,,-7.--.--,L7, ' -' II I • - +- •••• , - ,• II I ..,•r•:-",..,M.:•-,:4*,-:.--z-.. .-k,, ,-;•. 4,2.../t17;,...;-re.,14-!":„;.;-;•;*-L,- , , • ''' ... 1 ,'" •_•.', .•,....';•';,:'.:,; •-'. ' • ' I 1.7..r-41::..i.,----t-!:*-....,t):.- .-4- ---•-•..i4--,--7.---:.17--rA - . F. : -:.T- - •--------4,-m- zoss..15,-!_,--1,-_,‘,..,-•,,,, , . ., - 1 ., :'.... .''_ CR-5 , . _ ..-- .: - - :-' ..-- .:: -,... I.•"‘i--'.,.. ;!---"J...`_..-7-_, ,--- . -.-tff.-!--2E''''::.-.:-...P .--...,-1:7,--4.-•-•=--,-?:,..4,,,-;;7:':'1:-•:' • :. ': . I. .•-, -., .:- ' ',-'•'' ' ..:.T.- L'2..'?' - t:';', 5•;i:0-4.t.,:- '";-',':.,... .-'," -;':-'''"?..:r.":';':;.'''..:-.'-. •.'.....-L ' . . 1" 77:' 1„.',.'...-:;; ,:,.. ,• :, .: ::.:: , ....,. . I :-.t...:1'... ...,-.:: 1 I ., L.. ..•,f::':...e:::';.;:",-;','. , '..:,`.-Z.,,. ; ,iP; - I-,-"'''.;,-,-5-.--'•-"'Z',•7.7f.•-',-;1',,',-:1,''.:7_;.,-.•...is.::.;-'r...:,:',W--',%••;:.-,•.;:.: ;;;,::: - - -- - - ._ --I-- , ,•.,L -. -•,:'"---f---'7,;:lf:_t„...'"--•---‘i:-.11,•:',''S'1!-LT.1.7:..7-':,_,.;,4',Y-':V.J.:77-41;-'-'::C.:-..- :`:;,,, ' L,•-•s:--L',41...- 0A----q,"z':7:- .'''.,-;..--g#4.171413*M''`-- .-'5','"#t*•.••%;'"' `t•-''''-.4,-'*-A?',"% ki 1: ,4".":''''''''?''''"'`'''"•.-...4-',...'•'!''''''''''Z'''' ' - -.,_., -;7-7_,..."7;.--..,,,,..--- .-7---:'4.-.-;;;•-,;4s-,d•''..,,7,„z---%-*: -C*1:- ..317-1•.r•:"-;;;-:''-'.- -"•.- '' "'••;-•","•.''.''.1cu&e-r.,...:. * 0 1 ADWAy,;-*AVEN I "-....-:-:-...::-,-;•*6,;*-. ..-- ...7•64,z4 .''''-v.4,,,,;;; .:Aviv94,r .***:.,*4' --•''';',-'.- --";`4,-..!.•;•4m-%,,:w.•=,---',.:,-.!;;"77;=',7.'"7"*.r,...";".4•,,,:.• i---t-.:1.."7.; . _:,;.-4...,•,...:-;-• -,'-.;-*.ym.3.,..,..-* .* _ _ _t; ., .. .,.-.1,...,,.,,„...,:., ,.;t4,, 't..-.,,,, •mn;F:f` ,.. ',;•4,...,...'0.*,-i.i44.1e4,'"i n;a:ke,r 4.41 :'' ' -=-.''''.'''...:-..-1.7,;',i-.-- -- --.4:::'''''.,..--;;;•;;,'''''''.:--'7C:'''.4, -'',',:k. .F.*'''*';''''•- i.0-W.,. .'.-i....'1:::,;.'2,7,7..;..e,;;•i*,,;•,•.;;.1 .;.;"';':f-qr,,,,A.WIII&It' '- •'";...:'''' ---.,;7.,..c.,,,,,,,,,r,...',,tt,4:z.7-,,,,,,Vi.„7„...i.i....,:. .1,;:•,:s.v--;,‘,-';,.:1,!;',.W.:,;':' .:•:. •' '' ' -*,-r--:• ' - __ .1•,', - -...--gsL.g-,i;.4mig47g1a.gi,11rl,"!",‘k•-•.,a•-•,-V, r 0.-;_1---r,..r,-4.,,L4--41P-4t*a.P IorL*twI',t,4-'...-".:-'-..-" --7- ri ..',„-.-..',-..::..„,:':-„:•;,-._.--.-..-.-„:--•-:•-.„]-••,••,-.--,2.,;:_,4,.12--f,-.,,-.,.1.---•',,".:.•-y„•;-::,.,"..,.,,,-.i„'t.'!.:_:-'...,,.:,7.-„.,.--..,.-.:.-„_..-„.-..,.1'._'-,,,.„.....',..-:-,.L.-,.._,_...:L:J:.r..:.._:-.:.1_'-LA,-:, - 1I, L 1 • ----“"',7-%-'-7-',=,:•-.:-,-:,..'.•j•--' ,,:;,--;..,?:-;:',""T- -.•-ty..-:'' .... ..- '- . ' 1 '..,..•...;-'.. '::::-:•....'-,.-:----:,-,..',-7.."'"•:', --'-. '. I -- I., 1 -, , - • . . . _, .a-...;,,,,.„,-.„.......,,,,3,:.i.,4,;.:-„,„;,......„-_-=.7;.-„;..-„,:..,...,2i::;-....- - _ . ,_ - „_._-.._ -_.•-•___,-.-,,,,,.--..,-.:-,;-_ _-"-•.'=-,•.• -;'.'"" .'"" - ; V' ' .•,"' i -'''''''''''''k'4"'"'-:.'''''',".AS".;•*4.s. ...-':-.4." 4:;*;,,,''..: '".•' ',.- -• ••.- --- •-- -i•i---._-_„-__-...--..-..--..:,.-,..,-. ,_, 1 „,,.,„ . _ '''..-'4'.'"•."2.---lii.. -'-`-',-FV,4*.....$,F1,4-11 .'.•i.-,` .7.,_-iL-.;-,..;:, "-' ' --'--'''':'r-• ''" .TR ' --'- .----',T.-Iv:7''' :. ''' . I : ;-.I - ... . I -• -;44 1 TH/FD - -- 7-.,.1.-„,,,••-•-•-,-,:g.•-,7tv.)--, ..,-,.?_.,••••;-4,,i-41•%f.i.--..-.09..,,;,,..6,.. , - :.- -__ - I .-...:-- ---: -. ,- --- -,.-:-.-- .. - ' •_. --':-.1,-v.,.: . , 1 . • ..4..--.4-'-i-t-P--.ff,........:-.14:,,k,,,.....--,... .,-------:-.:.,...!---:- - ---- I• 1 ,• ' --- . : ' ---• --'' '' - ' ' ''.-'147'. I . '' - ' - . -• ,...,k1", 7-i"'',.?:•. :15.,,,""tr:ti-,,e'.••,-;,-;,-.:`::::•'-,..7.1.,-',--,. ---: •-• ' .' — ,- -:' .- ' ' - , - -- -- I : ' ' I ' — •--er..-,-.1.7r.e!.,. :1.4'a,:--er.f..A.-.N4-.-_.:k.',,,,,,T.:i24e-r-7-:-- -. - I ---.--- - - .:- - - ,. . --.--.1.:1a---'-::;-4..g.r,..-;Z:e1.4.-1:-.r.;•»:,:,P,11, L-',.`1•ZIS::1:::'(':'-''-' II '--''-.:• '--'-':'-- .- ' .. . -. ' I 1 I - • ' --•,-..-..-::-,-:.,-1--d.i.Y.t.i°,. :7-t;;:.4._:':,t,,r.,.:-..',.i..:-3:---r'-'.,a‘',..:,--.1..-...-.-;',- 'L . L . I ,, L :• - . .., . . . , . . ',...i.,. . . , _ _ --..:--...,=-,;•LF,L,--:=7.i",-,- --•‘•••••••;.-,t.,-,-:‘,.;•-....,:;•::.•J,ft,e-, :,'",---::. -L=-.-•-- 1 - , L. - - ',- - • I L 4-!•.-:, 1 - - ' -iv-L're.-.75--.?--.-7.--2"--,--.4..i.;47;51:•-•,..Ait, -----,--40-,•••--,-••,”:.,...,1;,''-L r ' - .• - - • II - : • - ','Li1.4:.•;.,:,-, :t.-.;:::N::,-7,-.74-:i-?..,:-;_W-,;,,-,a..T:?:,,..-:-..:7•-tiT-.7,-,,,..:.::.-% :-r..--•••-_ r I- -.-• - --,' '''.- ,,_.r 2: -,'• ' i .' 1 .. , - - ...-'.,...--,',!::".•‘?;s'::,7Y-7.'...!::?•-•:... M11::Zt.':;';',A.- 1:-*.-,''.1.:',.-12-.::':'..'.--7.. . '_ ' , -• -. . - • • - -, 4.-,,,,•,.. . , , - ...7t'.'....--•_:=,--,i-:,3W';•^,X4.•"-lit..,•:'1;:'..",7-..17::.:;:!.'.1:-.:•-•. .--'-- - 1 - - . , - ' • " ,, .. I_ •:.,---.•,-..: ,,• ,: I - '.'.. •^-, -..:t. -':..L...-4,::_;;.,.,,,::-.b.-11,:.ke..irz74:.;te,,,,vz!..•-,,,,,,,,,......::, , . '- ', . - ,,,, , . 7i'l--Iii. • , .: : • -- ,•-•---..v:-. ,-,-..,•, --- .-,'P,-,',...-41-:;74.--..t.1-:.•:-_z:-,,..,-- -.•••:-,'.- ' - ---_. . - • - - 7 7,.;....:i'.:'.1%j•• ;;;:,_:',7,;',:t-"A:7:--,V•iii.:IS :1,,,,,.'4;,-•-:4.i.'. .:,,: -,"-::_:-; I :' --: ' ' - ' - --' '.--7*':-'..--,:i-`,:---,'..- -*-17,`-!'74;:.:(4',7e-*:„ItErs'r*i-:•-','--•-,_. .' ;.,,,,,,,L.:-..... : -• --. - . ..".-1",-- r- -:_ ''.- - . i , •-•:17,....1,g ;::-. 4:1•'!!,.".,,•;;;77,1:-.. .'7,1z-----"-- -;:"`",r`M.--.-,' :....-;•.--2-1,- ' --• :..„''I ..: , -_- .„ . ._1_,-,s I•._,,::-._..,:._.....,.... ..,.;..,- -,L .. .0011%.,.-..tt;.=-7,4e-sec.:;;;;,14-44"!ii.;,-,--z:F-•':-. 17--:-.:-.,i. i-,--•7:i,-;•,,L-•' - , ,- . .-.. - - • -- • ' - - - .... .-:•:,.-.:7-42-47 .-1-41-;-•---,_...toolp.,,c,-r.7.„,..,,Li..i..7-•-,t-,-,;.:7,-.7.:„.-t:r.-- -'•:,-;-L.„.„..;:::., -•-. - " -=_-_=-___ _-,-___-___ ......„.....,,,,:_,....,, -,:,-;-..5;_,..;.,„,,..1,,z,.,„;.4•.,44.&:. .- .-Zzinr -;,..--.t t1"....,,,; , . ,- - '. - - - L L,:..- :- ' 1:,5,:...-:. -.7..,-;,--,,...,.. ,-.[•-:;--.-:%-:,...,-., ,:".',',:.•..,•"''.''- . ' -*":;--$.%`- '14'"•1•''."' $.'-',---.4,--L.'1'i',"--z-7.---*-"s7--7,-:-,,-* --- :-.-:•::'-'‘'-:-,'..''tt.-- - '.-,-,.. --------':,:--..---,,-.-,-•--.,:-: -.,'L-_,-- •-.. - - 1 •-...L-,L. - • . - . ..,.••-,.. .. *. ...,k,FF,L.44.:!,g---117V-if-4.x.,-'7•4*W., :-.:trof,k,vr•-,' li.-"'..:4- 3,1,,,`_t"C<.=.--4 `, - .-'-',=. ..-':-f--- - - '' -,,i,-::',ii,iig;. ..',..13e1.;70.-.- -41-1-A.--...,--.0.-, -,..:;- ..;:;'-. -..-:-":.-:•-' ..- ,_ . .. .. 1 ' • . '- - • - ' TH/PD [ • . ,r.--,•,..F.-....r.-:-,.,t-..-:•,,r,,,,--0:--,,,,---z-,,,f.- - ,....- -,,,,,,,k--,v4.,-,,,-.- E __•- .,.._____-- ., .. - . .:,., ...:--.,_',_„_ ,ii......77...,_.:_iii...17......_.,7.:::„.„..1„,..,....,.....„..,_,.,11,7. ... ..„ 4...,..,.4.,i....,....:.....4,,...,,,...:_ . .. . . :•_.„.....,. :.,.__. _ :. . _,.. .. . . ,..„.........., _. ... , _ • • ... . ..,. , , . , . . ...... . ., . ....:.. .. .. . ...,„:„......_.,...r.„...„.......,.:....„...„..„......,...,,,.....,..,,..,..... . . _ ._• ,.,..,.::,..,.1,...„„,.....,_..:s.,.,.,...„_.:,...„:•,.......,,.......,..„.„,..„7,_...„.:?_:.....: . . ... .. . .. . . _,... .. ... ...... ., . ... ....„.,„..._,_....: .. ...,. .. . . • . _„,.....„:,,_::,;_.....„,.„:,,..;:.,..,.: ...„,,...._„...:_,........,...„....„ ,....:,:... ,,... .: SUBJECT SITE ... • - - -, . • - '-.,F,:-..,-:',..:-.J;:.--.:,,,,:i-4.-...,:.:--4:-,:f-,,,,:.",.:•:-,-,:,..f... .-,--,.:-,;-_-_:-:!..--. • . . ill,_..7,.:- SCALE: _1_ - 200 •-_. - ,____-. . . ; .- --.--. , , ..-?---,- "..,-..-:,•-!•:::: 7.-,t'--•'_;•;:7-.7-7,7'7:--'"-,=-=••-..-• .,...::..;.:.-: a - -, _ _ . .. . ::::.,./...._, - .t.';-;.`,,,:'.;;;4 :::";:? - "- " . ''I,.:- LIMITS OF ZONING . ... • . , - . . ,..,...,.....1,-- .z::.:.,g,:,...,...---,...-_,-..,...:-,--,•-- --:• - -- -_ • ............ .., . , ,.. • _...„. , . _ . •- - - -. -... . , __ - ' - ORDINANCE NO. 297 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-35-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL /1.1N The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: The East 1 of the Northeast ; of the Northeast 1 of the Northwest ; of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the north fifty feet (50') and the east forty feet (40') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 OenN Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Davi F Alexander City Attorney PZ-35-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 297 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE 1 1- -I I II I I e I I � frilde I CR-5 CR-5 j I CR-3/PD I I I I I I I I I -- - - -- - - - -- - ---1�- - -- - ---1 �- _I WEST BROADWAY AVENUE I I I� I I I I I I I I I I TH I I TH/PD I I I I I I I I I I I WI I I > I I I Q1 o I I I I l L I I I q=_----- 1 ¢ I II = 1 I I Q I I I TH/PD I I � I 1 I I I I I - ------ L-- - - - - - -- -1 1-___ - --I i 1 SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 200' LI- LIMITS OF ZONING C PgACHE✓e O i' n,A ; ,r O V `'‘I ' L Z '. \ .,r!.. its o -.*,-'41- ZONPGLC�Ze �unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 15, 1984 .ter MEMORANDUM1: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ;f- 1MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: 4,% CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-37-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 299) SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-37-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 299, is a request by the applicant Verne Graves to rezone his property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a vacant 5 acre parcel located on the east side of Cactus Road, 300 feet south of Scenic Street in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes, houses, and vacant land. Planning Department Comments The site is characterized by a wash running southwesterly through the property which will limit practical development potential for much of the property. Staff would recommend the rezoning to TH, but would recommend the stipulation that development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City. This stipulation would prohibit development densities beyond the medium density level without review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council . Approver for Agenda /-f-1 atp Item # First Reading / 1 Second Reading / �e_ ►Public Hearing Old Business _/ New aisiness AL_ CJ ,sent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-37-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 299) August 15, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 14, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Jorgensen 4-3-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-37-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 299, application of Verne Graves for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are: The applicant has applied for this rezoning even though I don't see where it' s needed to do what they say they're going to do, but they want it, and it is compatible with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, and as General Rural is a holding classification, an upgrading would be feasible. " CRN:mas Adak Y -. ."Z` L�+r... "�.a.+G--a. pz-3 8 l ro— _�.�� �,.__ PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 299 PROPTOOSEDTRAILER REZONE FROMHOMESITE ZONE GR GENERAL (TH)RURAL r am c ,- .,- -. .arc•41+�ta?r*.."t 9Mf r E.V.s7in9 As,ads aims iii, I I r I--- LIIJ 1II1I!II - I II 1 rzl _—,.-- I I o o F -y�✓ ;7a: I.:'�- - ,�. � Nry"V CR-5ti I 11 or l SUBJECT SITE - N SCALE: 1" = 200' i1 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL eimmenir ORDINANCE NO 299 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-37-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROCISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. /01\ SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: The South 2 of the Northwest 4 of the Southeast 4 of the Northeast ; of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH); subject to the following stipulations 1) that the applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes; and 2) that the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 v Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM. D vi F Alexande City Attorney s PZ-37-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 299 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) 1 EAST SCENIC STREET r -i I I CR-5 i I I I I I I I I I I I CR-5 I CR-4 I I I l I Q I I 2 Q U H c, O ...... I I 1 CR-5 I EAST JUNCTION STREET 1 o SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 200' 1 j LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL - Ask Aft. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on September 4, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Ark, Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. INVOCATION Vice Mayor Eidson led the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present. Councilman Damiano, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Hill, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Staff Present. City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Public Works Rich Broman Controller Keith Lewis Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer Economic Development Specialist Amok John Schoeph City Engineer Jim Bakkedahl Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark Others Present: Cinda Graf, Interim Director Community Action Human Resources Agency Mr Richard D. Damiano 6157 E Hermosa Vista Drive Mesa, Arizona Mr A Richard Damiano 2304 W Cortez Rd Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Realtor Paul Connolly 1935 S Cactus Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Richard Herbert 934 W McDowell Phoenix, Arizona 'ask Oak Pastor Lowell Downey 1518 W. Roosevelt Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr Leon Ovando 1521 N. Orange Mesa, Arizona ^, Mr. Roy Hudson 2084 W 9th Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Bob Jones 1727 N Chestnut Circle Mesa, Arizona Mr. Chuck Jzastremski 5722 E. 10th Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr Jim Hurst 1065 N. San Marcos Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr R T Haas 1126 N. Goldfield Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 275, PZ-17-84, APPLICATION BY AL BELLUCCI AND KEN RAGAN TO REZONE 10 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD BETWEEN IRONWOOD AND VALLEY DRIVES IN SECTION 17, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), B PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 195, PZ-30-84, APPLICATION BY LEONARD HARDY OF HARDY TURQUOISE COMPANY TO REZONE 3.5 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 60 AND ROYAL PALM ROAD IN SECTION 28, FROM CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; C PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 296, PZ-34-84, APPLICATION BY DAVID AND TANEA BRADLEY TO REZONE 5 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF WINDSONG STREET BETWEEN DELAWARE AND GRAND DRIVES IN SECTION 18, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); D: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 301, PZ-39-84, APPLICATION BY COMMISSION INITIATIVE FOR A PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR HAVEN HOLLOW UNIT #2 AND A PORTION OF CHOLLA VISTA ESTATES FROM TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) TO CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE; E: ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 31, 1984, F ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1984, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 2 Auk VOTE In Favor Councilman Taylor, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Steelsmith, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Abstained Councilman Shanks, Councilman Hill (not present at regular meeting of August 21, 1984) The motion carried. Introduction of Distinguished Guests and Visitors Mayor Clarke recognized State Representative Roy Hudson. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS Ms Cinda Graf, Interim Director of Community Action Human Resources Agency, expressed gratitude for assistance received from the City, espec- ially Community Services, and addressed the City Council requesting further assistance in the form of funds and suggestions. Mayor Clarke read the following letter with great regret: "Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: Please accept my resignation from Apache Junction City Council effective October 2, 1984. Personal and business commitments do not allow me to devote the time to City business. It has been a pleasure serving with all of you Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Hank Steelsmith" PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 246, PZ-52-83 WEITKAMP CORP., SAMBORSKI, MILLER (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer briefed the Council on the application for rezoning of a 14 82 acre parcel,located between Meridian and Warner Drives and Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Windsong Street in Section 18 from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, Realtor Paul Connolly, 1935 S. Cactus, Apache Junction, stated that Mr. Teeples had not yet arrived at the meeting and requested that the hearing be postoned until a later time during the meeting or until another meeting Mayor Clarke stated that the hearing would be continued later in the meeting PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288, PZ-29-84 A R DAMIANO (Postponed First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr Newcomer briefed the Council on the application for rezoning of a 4.15 acre parcel, located at the southeast corner of Highway 88 and E. Hidalgo Street in Section 15 from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. Richard D. Damiano, 6157 E. Hermosa Vista Drive, Mesa, son of the applicant and operator of proposed business on the property in question, addressed the item and stated the nature of business which would be to repair golf carts with some retail sales. Councilman Shanks wished to know if the entire property would be utilized for this endeavor �..� Mr. Damiano replied that a building of approximately 5000 square feet would be located on the northeast corner of the property and one acre would be sufficient for the business. Councilman Shanks asked if any other business would be on the property also Mr. A. Richard Damiano, 2304 W Cortez Rd., Apache Junction, owner of the property, stated that the majority of the remaining property is washes, and would not be useable for businesses Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations Mr. Newcomer stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends the rezoning to CB-1 Local Business Zone and that this type of business would be appropriate for this zoning, and that the Planning staff also recommends that the application be changed to CB-1 Local Business Zone. Councilman Shanks stated that as she understood the zoning administrator's opinion, if the whole business; repair and sales, were enclosed in a building, CB-1 would be the appropriate zoning Mr. Richard D. Damiano stated that the whole business, excluding storage, would be enclosed in the building. Mayor Clarke requested that further information be submitted at the second reading Councilman Shanks requested a more accurate description be given of the area to be used for the business City Manager Michael J. McNulty stated that a video of the area would be shown at the second reading. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 288, by title only for the first reading City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 288, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 297, PZ-35-84, HERBERT, AMERICAN BUSINESS CORP , MEAKER AND MURPHY (First Reading) ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Newcomer stated that this is an application for rezoning of a 4.6 acre parcel, located on the southwest corner of Broadway and San Marcos Drive in Section 29, from GR General Rural to CB-1 Local Business Zone. Mr Richard Herbert, 934 W. McDowell, Phoenix, one of the owners of the property, requested approval of the application. amok Vice Mayor Eidson asked what the proposed property use would be. Mr. Herbert stated that the property would be used for either reail shops or offices in a one-story garden plaza. Vice Mayor Eidson asked if they understood that CB-1 zoning restricts the types of businesses allowed. Mr. Herbert replied that this was understood. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations. Mr. Newcomer stated that the Planning Department has no objections and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application with certain stipulations. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 297, by title only for the first reading ORDINANCE NO. 297, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-35-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 298, PZ-36-84, Amok BEEMAN AND JOHNSON (First Reading) ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mr. Newcomer briefed the Council on the request for rezoning of a .95 acre parcel, located on the southeast corner of Roosevelt Street and Ironwood Drive in Section 20, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. Mr. Keith Stachar requested approval of the application. Councilman Damiano wished to know the proposed use. Mr. Stachar stated that there is not a specific use planned at this time, possibly a tenant for business uses Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. Pastor Lowell Downey, 1518 W Roosevelt, Apache Junction, wished to know the type of business, because as the proposed rezoning is across the street from a church, especially if the business would include liquor REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 5 41P^--s Oak Mayor Clarke explained that when applying for a liquor license, there is a 300 foot requirement of distance from churches and schools There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations. Ammik Mr. Newcomer stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning request and the Planning staff has no objections to the application. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 298, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 298, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-36-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 299, PZ-37-84, GRAVES (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Newcomer stated that this is an application for rezoning of a 5 acre parcel located on the east side of Cactus Road, 300 feet south of Scenic Street in Section 21, from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH). Mr. Leon Ovando, 1521 N. Orange, Mesa, representing the applicants, who are presently out-of-state, requested approval of the application. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations. Mr Newcomer stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, and that the Planning staff has no objection to the proposal. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 299, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 299, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-37-84, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 300, PZ-38-84, HUDSON (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 6 Alm Als• Mr. Newcomer briefed the Council on the application for rezoning of a 1 5 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Ironwood Drive and Broadway Avenue in Section 30, from CR-3 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. Mr. Roy Hudson, 2084 W 9th Avenue, Apache Junction, requested approval of the rezoning for the purpose of building a retail shop plaza, and introduced the spokesman for the devel- / oper Vice Mayor Eidson asked if re- strictions could be placed on the property which would prohibit businesses that might cause traffic congestion problems with the school. Mr. Hudson stated that he had no objection to restrictions of this nature Mr. Bob Jones, 1727 N. Chestnut Circle, Mesa, spokesman for the developer, outlined the proposal and re- quested approval of the application Councilman Damiano asked if gas stations or other businesses that would cause traffic congestion could be put in if the property changed owners Mr. Jones stated that restrictions such as this should be specified in the ordinance, and that the building permits for such a business would not be approved if this was in violation of the ordinance restrictions. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations Mr. Newcomer stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of a,CB-2 zoning in this area as it would not be consistent with the General Plan, but may be rezoned CB-1 as it would be more restrictive. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 300, by title only for the first reading. /► City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 300, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-38-84 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting. Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 315, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CITY CODE (First Reading with Emergency Clause) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly ex- plained that in the future there would be proposed ordinances presented to the Council that would amend various sections of the City Code, that are REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 7 40"- it Amok outdated in comparison with State regulations and City needs. Ms Connelly stated that this proposed ordinance amends two sections, requiring two Council meetings per month, and the order of business on the agenda. These amendments would permit the Mayor to cancel a meeting and further updates the City Code to the present order of agenda items in use Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the ordinance. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 315, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 315, by title only with the emergency clause City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 315, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 2 MAYOR AND COUNCIL, SECTION 2-4-1 REGULAR MEETINGS; AND SECTION 2-4-6 ORDER OF BUSINESS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 315, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 2 MAYOR AND COUNCIL, SECTION 2-4-1 REGULAR MEETINGS, AND SECTION 2-4-6 ORDER OF BUSINESS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS Awilk APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 318, AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE CITY CODE, BARBED WIRE FENCES (First Reading with Emergency Clause) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. 1 Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer outlined the amendment to the City Code as pertains to barbed wand electric fences Mr. Chuck Jzastremski, 5722 E 10th Avenue, Apache Junction, Chairman of the Superstition Horseman's Association, addressed the Council in favor of the proposed amendments. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 8 Mr Jim Hurst, 1065 N. San Marcos, Apache Junction, wished to know if fence could be installed around a trailer park for protection. Mr. Newcomer stated that as trailer and RV parks are considered residential, barbed wire fences are not permitted. Mr. Hurst asked why the City pre- Amok viously gave permission to place a barbed wire fence around his property Mayor Clarke suggested this matter be checked into further. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the amend- ment. There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 318, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Taylor wished clari- fication of whether mobile home parks are considered residential or commercial, or if they can or cannot use barbed wire. Mr. McNulty replied that this would have to be determined, and if it is desired, a future amendment can be made. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 318, by title only with the emergency clause. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows Alink ORDINANCE NO. 318, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 10 OFFENSES, SECTION 10-1-8 FENCES; BARBED WIRE, AND ELECTRIC, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 318, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 10 OFFENSES, SECTION 10-1-8 FENCES, BARBED WIRE, AND ELECTRIC; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 9 --3 oak CONTINUANCE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 246, PZ-52-83, WEITKAM CORP , SAMBORSKI, MILLER THROUGH BRENT TEEPLES. Mr Paul Connolly stated that Mr Brent Teeples has not yet appeared. City Attorney David Alexander stated that if Mr. Connolly has proper designation by the applicants, he may present the case. Mayor Clarke reopened the hearing to the public Mr. Connolly requested approval of the rezoning application. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations Mr. Newcomer stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application with stipulations, and the Planning staff also has no objections Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 246, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 246, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-52-83 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. OLD BUSINESS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 307, LIQUOR LICENSE FEES (Postponed Item) Mayor Clarke explained that this item should be further postponed Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 307 BE FURTHER POSTPONED TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1984. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-48, AB-84-11, HARE (Postponed Item) City Attorney Alexander informed the Council that this had been investigated and that the council could proceed with the item by resolution. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 10 �s Auk Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-48, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT CERTAIN DEDICATIONS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON NORTH GRAND DRIVE FROM WEST PIONEER STREET TO WEST SMOKETREE STREET, AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-84-11, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY VACATED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. omak Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor* Councilman Damiano, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Hill, Councilman Steelsmith, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Abstained: Councilman Shanks (not in attendance when case presented) The motion carried. NEW BUSINESS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO CLEAN PROPERTY - ARTICLE 9-2 OF CITY CODE ) Ms Connelly explained Mrs. Marilyn Shine had received one extension on August 6, 1984, to bring her property into compliance with Article 9-2 of the City Code and is now requesting a further extension as the property is in the process of being purchased Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXTENSION OF A MAXIMUM OF 14 DAYS BE GRANTED TO MRS MARILYN SHINE, TO BRING SAID PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 9-2 OF THE CITY CODE Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Amok PROPOSED RESOLUTION NOS. 84-38, 84-41, 84-42, 84-43, AND 84-44, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION Mr Newcomer explained that these resolutions are an application for $125,000 for construction of a Senior Citizens/Community Center as an annex to the City Library. Vice Mayor Eidson asked if it would be necessary for the City to match these funds. Mr. Newcomer replied that no this was not a matching grant Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 84-44, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, COMMITTING LOCAL FUNDS AS LEVERAGE FOR THE 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 11 Amok_ A BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-38, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, COMMITTING AVAILABILITY FOR USAGE BY SENIOR CITIZENS OF THE PROPOSED SENIOR CITIZENS/COMMUNITY CENTER TO BE FUNDED IN PART BY 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-41, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, IDENTIFYING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEEDS AND ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN TO MEET SUCH NEEDS, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-42, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND CERTIFYING THAT SAID APPLICATION MEETS THE LOW AND MODERATE BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-43, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING A PLAN TO MINIMIZE DISPLACEMENT AND ASSIST PERSONS ACTUALLY DISPLACED AS A RESULT OF ACTIVITIES FUNDED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITH 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Taylor seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 84-37, AB-84-14, A.R. DAMIANO AND MATOUSEK 1 ) City Engineer Jim Bakkedahl briefed the Council on the abandonment of Hidalgo Street between Cortez Road and Bowman Road between Windsong Street and Highway 88, which is not open or maintained by the City, and the Development Coordinating Committee has no objection to the abandonment Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 84-37, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN iok FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON HIDALGO STREET BETWEEN CORTEZ ROAD AND BOWMAN ROAD AND BOWMAN ROAD BETWEEN WINDSONG STREET AND HIGHWAY 88, AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-84-14, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE In Favor Councilman Taylor, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Hill, Councilman Shanks, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Abstained. Councilman Damiano (possible conflict of interest) The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 12 As .40 PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 83-18, AB-83-7, BARBER, KOERNER, HAAS, LAABS, JONES, SIERRA ENTERPRISES INC., POLEGA ARMSBY AND YEAGER Mr Bakkedahl addressed the Council in regard to the application for abandonment of Manzanita Street, Mockingbird Street, and Greasewood Street from North Hilton Road to North Goldfield Road, which is not open or maintained by the City, and the Development Coordinating Committee has no objection to the abandonment Mr Bakkedahl stated that the next abandonment is the second phase of this application. Mr R T Haas, 1126 N Goldfield, Apache Junction, questioned the easements being abandoned and wished to have this investigated further prior to abandonment. City Manager Michael McNulty re- commended that the Council postpone this case and the following abandonment case until the next regular meeting City Attorney Alexander commented that this should be checked into before proceeding. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 83-18 AND RESOLUTION NO. 84-50, BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN COST FOR PROSPECTOR PARK DEVELOPMENT ) Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell briefed the Council on the proposal that was submitted to the Council, and recommended that $36,400 00 be approved for the engineering work by Carter Associates for the initial development of Prospector Park Mr McNulty stated that the costs will be within the $300,000.00 which was approved by the voters Councilman Steelsmith pointed out that this includes construction staking, not just design Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE ENGINEERING DESIGN COST FOR PROSPECTOR PARK DEVELOPMENT PROVIDED BY CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., OF PHOENIX IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,400 00, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried AWARD OF BID FOR CORRUGATED METAL PIPE Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that this pipe will be utilized for storm drainage purposes and recommended the bid be awarded to the lowest bid submitted, ARMCO Construction Products, in the total amount of $25,905.60. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 13 Anibk Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT PW-84-30 CORRUGATED METAL PIPE BE AWARDED AS FOLLOWS: TO ARMCO CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,905.60 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN TO THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO PURCHASE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE IN THE AMOUNTS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE PROPOSED PROJECTS, AS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. Mr. McNulty informed the Council that there will be additional sections not covered by this bid. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. APPROVAL OF ADDITIONS TO ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS) Mr. McNulty explained that there have been some changes to the improvements to the administrative building, due to lower costs than planned, which would create an additional approx- imate 700 square feet of space, at a cost of $14,000.00. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE ADDITIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,000 00 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Councilman Taylor seconded the motion VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried �� ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM AND APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MR. RICHARD ROGERS FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET Councilman Damiano read the following letter "Dear Mayor, City Council, and Commissioners. Effective this date, I am resigning from the Planning and Zoning Commission I will be moving out of the City of Apache Junction and, therefore, will not meet the qualifications to sit as a Commissioner. I wish to thank the Commissioners, and the Mayor and City Council for making my term a pleasant one. Sincerely, Richard Rogers" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CHUCK HEERMANS, BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF MR. RICHARD ROGERS, SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1986. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 14 r--s Ark Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried WORK SESSION, SEPTEMBER 17, 1984 ..� EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 17, 1984, AT 7 00 P M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1984, AT 6 00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried CALL TO THE PUBLIC None INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS None. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL None ADJOURNMENT Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 9:35 P.M. Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL O 17E CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZ NA. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 15 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk I REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 PAGE 16 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 `1 ITEM # MEETING OF (7 MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS \/' COUNC I LMAJ DAM IANO v VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ✓ COUNCILMAN ICIL.L ✓ UNANF^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 246 , PZ-52-83 , APPLICATION BY WEITKAMK CORP . , RUTH SAMBORSKI , AND HERBERT MILLER THROUGH G. BRENT TEEPLES TO REZONE A 14. 82 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED BETWEEN MERIDIAN AND WARNER DRIVES AND LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND WINDSONG STREET IN SECTION 18 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ; B : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 297, PZ-35-84, APPLICATION BY RICHARD HERBERT , AMERICAN BUSINESS CORP . , ALBERT AND THOMAS MEAKER , AND WILLIAM MURPHY TO REZONE A 4. 6 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BROADWAY AND SAN MARCOS DRIVE IN SECTION 29 , FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE ; C: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 299, PZ-37-84, APPLICATION BY VERNE GRAVES TO REZONE 5 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF CACTUS ROAD , 300 FEET SOUTH OF SCENIC STREET IN SECTION 21 , FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE ( TH ) ; D: ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 , BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. .•.. PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217, P7-3n-R' . THE APPLICANT IS HAMBI IN OF _HAMBI TN OTVFRSTFTFD 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED fTc V l ; z oc @� '�RizoNP `fit o ache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Approver- fur Agenda. September 12, 1984 Dte 9 g_Jet Minn,tk First fief tec:snd MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CIT Old Business THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY , CITY MANAGER(,&Jh, ,�eivi ,siness FROM: ctt'CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING--Consent Agend4„ SUBJECT: 1 REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-30-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16 , 1984 - SECOND READING Background Rezoning Case No. PZ-30-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 217, is a request by the applicant Greg Hamblin of Hamblin Diversified to rezone his property from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD for Parcel No. 1 and to CR-5 for Parcel No. 2. The site is located between Plaza and Monterey Drives , 120 feet north of 20th Avenue. On the four acre (4) Parcel No. 1 , the applicant proposes to develop 34 twin-homes on lot sizes of 3,150 square feet per dwelling unit and utilizing a zero lot line system. The applicant intends to subdivide Parcel No. 1 - since this is a planned development, the applicant will provide 20% open/recreational space which will include a pool , recreation building and shuffleboard courts. For the 39,000 square feet Parcel No. 2 , the applicant is requesting conventional CR-5 zoning which could result in a maximum of 19 dwelling units based on our zoning ordinance's 2 ,000 square foot per dwelling unit requirements. However, the applicant has stated his intention to have a maximum of four (4) lots , each of which could be developed to a maximum of four (4) units. Zoning adjacent to the site is CR-5 on the south and the west and CR-3 to the east and north. Surrounding land uses include a church to the north, multiple family units to the south and west, and single family homes to the east. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayc".i'mnd Members of the City Counci''^ Request for Agenda item - September 18, 1984 PZ-30-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 217) September 12 , 1984 Page Two Designation on the General Plan is "high density residential " . Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) and Planning Department Comments: The DCC had no objection to the twin-homes on Parcel No. 1 and four-plexes on Parcel No. 2. Detailed engineering and site design considerations can be taken care of at the preliminary and final PD stage. The Planning Department would request that the floor plans be designed such that more of the facade of the homes would be viewed from the street rather than carports and cars. From the standpoint of compliance with the General Plan and the compatibility with the adjacent zoning and land uses, the Planning Department would recommend approval . Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation At their September 11 , 1984, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission adopted the following motion by a 6-0 vote: (Taylor/Jorgensen) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that in rezoning case PZ-30-83 also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 217, application of Greg Hamblin of Hamblin Diversified for his property described as a matter of public record requesting rezoning from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5 Multiple Residence by Planned Development, (this is the twin homes that will be offered for sale) for both Parcel No. 1 and No. 2, and rejecting the Parcel No. 2 , rezoning for multiple family, Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of this application as set forth with those changes. Stipulations or Recommendations are: 1. That the applicant dedicate the interior streets if they are to be public streets. 2. That the floorplans be redesigned so that more of the facade of the homes may be viewed from the street. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. Even though the multiple family rezoning is permissible under the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, it actually is not compatible with this particular area. Even though this area was designated a possible high density area by the General Plan, there is more CR-3 in this area. In my opinion, we should keep the CR-3 zoning if possible, and encourage these developers to put in homes for resale. It does comply with Section 33 of the General Plan (Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Apache Junction. " CRN:jl —k Accwr P.R.ZNIrt. ! I�.MgV!IyNMy/1UP,APP.,'1•e,n�:l.. / 'I a-O"HI(SH MSSO115Y WALLS--_________. .o...•v UV 1 _ 1' 120.00' 102 QO' j 63 Oc 3S.Do' c .00' 35,00' 36.00' ' 35,00' 3s,co' •I!4 I 3�G� 3S co' 3S.od b5 co'' 3 - -I I,' ., I i I:- 0 ° zEIENTIOj) �l i . I !n 'n $• 4.4.a.4. O f - !,,m ,u 3 PI 20 21 8 22 8 • 212 0 2 i- ° 25 1.C., Qi 2-1 8 28 B °I b 2`l a �O � Ili II iIj a PIPft.To s a (i� h I I 11O OW % 1 e7 ite-renroN i1I I I!' Il I NC') . tiD fp O j 1 -if N p o>WVPGr� N 0 (-- Q I I m • r Li 4 o a I OZ ( I2O.00' 120.00% I--� I � NI ' $ tourl�eY '�1• V __ 0 tz�L ao cv' ..J 1 _ I p 4 �>tXOG. 2 ' Q 1 J y i? M KLL^l. pEUIG 32 a �V ill 11 ' - ' - DEwA��-�" - � R �: F— rLaZLt GIIZG,L� f--�' No e— 'I ?e, 2. F.. 1 I20 OO' w..-..s y1 re.TO I 1. REfen-nem • I - V I p I _p _p o O - n ,2 i., O S 8 0 ;4718/ / OO I OoI �� m 8rzEi TIOrl 12 I 1 s I. 8 ;' 16 Hq-% : 2 $ I U I, . , ', ; , tI ) .. . _ 120 00' :-.2 - Y IO/L 00 I 1 �j3 001 4,9,00' 3E'•001 3S Do' 35 OO' ,s,c,.,OO' 3 I"S OO_ f 36 00' as,oo ,OO' St-,ao' 3:a,oa' 6(o.oo' MORTN - (Zo,.,,.o of +,,,.s (w. r� . NOres LOTS f >=`G4 L.OT I TO rLETAIN I.OTg I TH20 1I O. 2.0 T}1rW 3 I'> owN WATUL �}'=�/jl CjO F? 2. p,- 10-4 TO A.,/r- wTe+ I'L Th ) I'! 4.2006 FAC-f C 9z'¢Esscfl 4Y OZ,VC4.' 5 bOD auD um A= erl,°100 EAC4 (b� r a w 1r„ •�6 �rt ccE, awee sTRs_GT waTcrL CAL-CS r $Co 2 SUPz'. 5I 1 TIOM 4EIGa—ITS a!///�I� �c-co X.25-°;I K.1o= 'I 010 co.pi 4c:= 6 -C409S E6C41 .—.- /L 2F_TBnT.on b ,oy coo.102 =ro120>..I3"Des?= 1Igo o v PT feEUMIt.lA2Y FLAT C47'o GF 6...) 5 ,{..M A.twc..so U1"ILITIG4 Sc4�E. , I,00'-0. •VI G HQ I TY MAP \VPT 6.a.I ZONA'-' TEE C-0 - , �o �c,��� riE`�/G 2: INiDIV IIOtJD.{„�c/GPTIci . L.-ECi. 're.4.-T 21-Err. p rz.e.AJ T TCI.I- // (n111T/ItI lfCu..- II W II .....,,,,, ,..., Plan 1052 �. • . . 0,. . r,„ ,>,;I .. t • 9 4', Air „• w ee r ,a ,r et 1.;r ;4 f ELEVATION A olk p, ..,, _,.......,. __ __ ,_a - ,r,7.--=-- ---------,,_---=,-_--,--T.:„:_:„.?„0"... •• .„,,, ,„_,.... A-A"' e. _ lkiii•, t; - _ ,, vii ,„.-all , 'I , '; ilk 1 —":41Y1AVAT.' sa....4 i ll I It, ��f:f4i;-' rik, "T� ; 1, _ Iff'Ii.. ,l i JI �,a. • . I :• j I •I• -{_}Z�74Y�v. _ I' -h M III V ril;Lts, . T .or ,- ss�.. ,,,,G .......sit, + � ,.a e \lI Ili /.•-..,."/,..s.%-t1 ' , _ 14 1'1r:/'i/,A•- ELEVATION B 4.e. ,,,.,_-_,=_:„__--,__-_,___-„,:„--,_,_„____------_--_-_ _:____„_•----_,-==_-__.,_-_,_:-:,_ ::._-______„_-. =..__ •:„...drjoirri„t„,,g:-,.....,--,---77------1, ,":,,---;1=-------61=--771---- 4k-,. -1$'11- I II ,' Ii;i it''I11� ii-i ill ,I or, 1 ''";, _ ` _-1ry . ' ' I I IA.. r• se 'ice_ -_ -PPP - _ _ 1.� :' 1�W. Y _y .>.. _x MX.i'lLitIt't.. .11.11rel''' ' --- ''ivy .' F ra;Z ,111 Alit'h4 l ` .i'is "•�l'II.11�II ' 11 � ELEVATION C r� _- _ ! �= I 1. Ip e 4 � �✓ '1. { t r J 'i� i `F` a it 4 1 i ! 0,1 11 III �ll, 7 :i 1 I ` I III 1 (I r f i r 1 5s r in �ivilpi�rr! 1 fri.- IVi •7I1 AI[ — I .' �1 �K�f, _____ ,„ : ._ __ _ -I {� 1 ��t, r1 '°ii4"�^ ....7 t,� Ye -,rl .�1 090 - �, 'I;i - • _ 'r-e1 �.• s' - Elevations will vary slightly depending upon floor CI plan. Contractor reserves the right to make minor charges in dimensions and alterations in materials, 1 �xe+.10 elevations a other conditions at depicted indraw ''w•nwt. mugs or displayed in model units. Adak Ada► 0 14. COVERED PATIO S} _ 1 MASTEA BEDIIOOM - i iir BEDROOM 2 O MABTETt1R 0 BA LimiX1 <Jo o 0 9 �,Er ° BEDROOM 3Jg .3 „ II II KITCHEN —00 OO'— • • • •_ i LIVING ROOM 0 DININO .a • 1111 r-1 r-1 r—� ...•...., qo d • —� .cYJj ,I VimAli: • ' - •�i I O STORAGE ! •` ■ lip " C ,•?.. :• _ �Yi DOUBLE CARPORT 4 n t JawueJD ToJeD Tv V),-----) 1--,77/1-yry 7 -1129),W 4_ hATeJaputs siJud Ja [ teJ; put? .A *H +0 wnTno4tJow IluauewJad T 4.0 ...10 .4. UT oll a-tu am qp.inq3 s ,afiJoa9 —49 +o ;gam puu qq.nos aqq. o4 ua .w aq4 auozeJ o; ago/ -lou cp aseeld 'a-lo+a,laqi ,4T +o MAT+ Lit 4I40A noA nil-1pm hponqJoriqbtau JnoA ut auop butaq aJam sitqq. +1 ..E4-Jooupoclubtau Jtaq4 ut sTapJut auozaJ C1J. I.Jaumoawnq o4 _Ate+ -4 ,usl 41 '12us1. icie4sa ApeaJle aJe quq4 aot.1-4 Pago-id puu suo.v:icAtpqns ATTwe+ albuts pauuutd butAJaaJd Aci .cq4 aJnsui 4snm am 'e,oJe sTq4 o4 Ja4em 1iu1aa4ueJenn .d .v . aq4 q4tm A aq.4 +0 -lutq4 qsnw noA .uotquindod A ( Twu+ abJui i' apnInut ITTm AT4DaJJ0D pauueTd J.T 6qotqm A4Tunwwoo 12 M4UT CiAl()AR AITTJ114TU TTIm uocgnupp aqpudv 4eq4 Taa+ am "ssuaJv AtTure+ aTdt4Tnw og BeaJe outlTamp fITwe+ al6uTs +0 oUlUOZe...4 AUT 4su1ebe a,le am 4eq.4 noA wJoyut og uscm puu Out4aaw butuozaJ stq4 pual4u a; acquun aJu am taa4.4twwoo outuoy pue nuTuueTH aq4. ATTe:Dt4tmads pue ilDuno:.1 A4T3 aqg oi t86T ' If Jaqwe4d3S 'oak OIN ORDINANCE NO. 217 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-30-83 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT- SECTION I IN GENERAL 1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as Parcel No. 1: (from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development) The South } of the Southeast A of the Northwest 3 of the Southeast A of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the west 120 feet thereof, and Parcel No 2 (from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone) The west 120 feet of the South § of the Southeast A of the Northwest ; of the Southeast ; of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development; and from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone. 2 The approval of the zoning district classification shall be construed as only concept approval for the base zoning and shall serve as official approval of the base zoning amendment to the Zoning Map 3. Development of said property shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes, policies, guides, and detailed standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improvements. 4 Applicant shall dedicate all rights-of-way and easements as required by the City prior to final plan approval. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 a Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. 1 a t F. Al Cit ,Attorney I I ORDINANCE NO 217 PAGE TWO OF TWO Am. or s PZ-30-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217 PARCEL NO. 1: PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENLE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. PARCEL NO. 2. PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE, 1----- -i I I I j I I 1 cR-3 I I I I I - - 1 CR-3 I—===1 1-- — — — - - —"--1_--I I I II I I cR-5 I I I II I I I I III I — - -- -----1 �_- ---_! II i W, 18TH AVENUE ICR-3 11CR-5 1---— -- ----- -----I ------ I I t cR-3 I III I I I \ > I I w �I----Iwi I----) �I cR-3 Q o --- I F I 1�—— I z -I II i .. l 1 0 El 11 I /\ Eli 10, a1 11 I wI--- - - - - - -- -5 --- 1 u'I cn UI 11 i CR 5 CR I L_. — —J Ii I I II L W. 7nTH AVFNIEj1 - - - - - ---4 II CR-5 I o; CR-5 I II _ --i JI it CR-3 I °1 CR-3 II I _ - - — — — - - - --I (i- - — — - -ii— _ _ J t111 PARCEL 2 - SUBJECT SITE lq PARCEL 1 - SUBJECT SITE N SCALE' 1"-200' I LIMITS OF ZONING L_ 41=7- Cam_ ITEM NO. 3 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 217 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING. PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303 PZ-40-84 THE APPLICANT IS DRUCKMAN 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN' S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED /kk rlIZT:i11- > : i ti ,,c•, ' /Z014 "Os it o L ipucn�e �� u; clicn DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: '7%,0/ MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: 0J' CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-40-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-40-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 303, is a request by the applicants David and Lauretta Druckman through Mike Kovacs to rezone their property from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 3.4 acre parcel located on the southwest side of Highway 60, about 600 feet west of Cortez Road in Section 27. It is designated General Commercial Opportunity/Medium-High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include Cortez Trailer Park, a machine shop, and a house. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the General Commercial General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. �, Approver for Agenda �-� 7 at Itemm # First Reading T Second Reading .. ublic Hearing _ Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-40-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 303) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Vehon 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-40-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 303, application of David and Lauretta Druckman for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are• The applicant dedicate the south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . This commercial rezoning is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. 2. It is the best use of the property at this time. " CRN:mas r-- PZ-40-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303 PROPOSED REZONE FROM TRAILER NOMESITE ZONE (TH) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ( fx i.� (Toads t ------- - "R -;,� .n�C ,«, o-nk,•: tam s. c= , ,=: .4 ''''..1....''I't . ....''''r.."I:4 4k...M1N:$44.'?..-i...,:,..- i•'; I xa ..: aya ,I I _� /— z I _� C, o I CB-2 T Y ; EAST 20TH AVENU I wI 1 11 II 1 CB-2 ii I . I' TH TH 1 '1 1E. v, ii '2. .. II11 I gni 7 I I I f1-- - - --J L _I i' NI) EN I SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 200' I LIMITS OF ZONING (RE:I",AINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) s ORDINANCE NO 303 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-40-84 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ISECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The West 1 of the Southeast ; of the Northeast ; of the Southwest a of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY { If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 . Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk L APPROVED AS TO FORM D viAC Alexande City Attorney Ask PZ-40-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 303 PROPOSED REZONE FROM TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE I I - , EAST 18TH AVENUE I I I I 7\::::::::1 I I Fgs7. .Q yI GyW,9r TH O IJ Q Q 60 O GC I I z cam r w � I I I = _ 70- I I---- --J o CDI CB-2 _- -- `I EAST 20TH AVENUE r 1 F . II I Q I I II CB-2 I il = I II N I IL) Si TH i I TH I= I I I1- �l I I Io �I I I I"' 1 I I I I- I 01 I I I c.)I I I I I I I I-- - - —- L --I ' Ill AVENUE 1 11 A SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 200' LI 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) .r: ITEM NO . 4 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 303 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING. PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304 PZ-41-84 THE APPLICANT IS CHRISTENSEN AND WILLIAMS 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED Ask AO\ ( cHE ✓, . O gRiZONP ` its v� ` pac�ie �unctivn DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 //v Approver for Agenda to Item # MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading 'll Y�Fl Second Reading THROUGH. 17S; MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER 7.Public Hearing Old Business FROM: drCHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING_ New Business Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-41-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-41-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 304, is a request by the applicants Robert Christensen and Ronald and Anna May Williams through Keith Stachar to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a two-acre parcel developed with mobile homes and located at the northeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes and vacant land. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes Staff also recommends that this property not be allowed to develop into an RV or mobile home park, unless otherwise permitted by the City. There is a valid protest on file by Charles Salakin whose property lies to the north of the site. He owns 100% of the land within 150 feet on the north side and, therefore, approval of this rezoning requires a three-fourths vote of the City Council . 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-41-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 304) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Jorgensen/Tepolt 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-41-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 304, application of Ronald and Anna May Williams and Robert Christensen for R. E. Christensen, Inc. for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited; except as otherwise permitted by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It is in accordance with the Medium Density General Plan designation. 2. It is a good use of the property. " CRN:mas } PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby rotest rezoning case PZ- where a zone change is proposed from Gl . o-rl e DcfetLto at Pz 1-J— Er•on r- S� � , ',r.-ram (location) ,4 W �, 5 2 cd B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: 1 . ' s 2. )/t/r! P al-1e1- 0,7 l< Lt d. t 3. A _ _ - _ - 1 - - - , a , iO/p --� jej4. s� — — a, _ . ,,,. , ,I,'7�f47 5. - 4. ,_ s; - "1._ 41 I a - -S ► -neo it kll ' '''e-l (12aL pe-- 2h -lr_ _lay - Ne- 1.d COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) IGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. Azi.446e:./ 3. .-( - - 4. - - STATE OF l5 ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this SS. 2 3 day of ir,� v/- , 1 g,( V , COUNTY OF 6 ) by L r. '1w2i MR • V / ,./ ' -// y , - .. ., _,/ i e—y- z._., _ _ - NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:VPD., ' r, STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of /1,1i 1?219 1984 , COUNTY OF ) by Cr F-L-ANN1N'u AND DEVELOPMENT NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: PZ-41-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304 PROPOSED REZONE FROM (R GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) 1 inExr ii7y iaadS t a I I :: , I r 1f1_ :: q CR-5 1 I w,, i •Ili/ I fy�. tom. .�. ! :,. . x-t .v:N *yj,.-' --- '7-1f .....p`Di+*^4�'.+MEatts/RMWI9aSg7Y• .^:,+f:;r' 4�p- .. .Y 1 --PRUPOSE I _ . 1 I TH 1 1 (EXISTING 1 I CR-5 --1 , I ITA 1 I II I I c 1 I j II II---- II I 1- U CR-5 11 CR-4 I 1 1 LI C 1 = C II 1 f I r II 1 z I II I --- - - -- II 1 r I SUBJECT SITE I N SCALE: 1" = 200' I_J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) I Oommnir olomk ORDINANCE NO 304 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-41-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as The North and the South } of the Southwest A of the Southwest $ of the Northeast A of the Northeast A of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) that the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this LLL Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by th decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av . Alexan e City Attorney r-s PZ-41-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 304 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) i 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 ///////7 1 I 1 CR-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 � J EAST SCENIC STREET I --1 PRi3POSEIS1 I I TH 1 1 1 EXISTING I ____1 CR-5 I ' I t 1 Q 1 I � I I I - I�----1 1 lI I F-- 1 CR-5 �� CR-4 1 III 1 if I II I cc '1 I z I II I I II I L -- II i SUBJECT SITE rj SCALE. 1" = 200' i 1--1 l_J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) r"" C- ITEM NO. 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 304, BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING. PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR pROPnSFD ORDTNANCF NO_ "1()5 PZ-42-84 THE APPLICANT IS WILLIAMS 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED ix?ACHE✓G U ;I . 41 gR�ZONP "Oily o pace unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: , _ /4 MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: yCHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-42-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 305) , SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-42-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 305, is a request by the applicants Ronald and Anna May Williams through Keith Stachar and Mike Kovacs to rezone their property from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a 57,000 square foot parcel developed with a mobile home and located at the southeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/ High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes and vacant land. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Staff also recommends that this site not be allowed to be developed into an RV or mobile home park unless otherwise permitted by the City. Approver for Agenda p to / Item U First Reading //.� Second Reading ..[Public Hearing - Old Business New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-42-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 305) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Tepolt/Jorqensen 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-42-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 305, application of Ronald and Anna May Williams for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the north and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited; except as otherwise permitted by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are• 1 . It is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. 2. It seems the best use of the land at this time. 3. It is in accordance with the prescribed density. " CRN:mas PZ-42-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 305 I PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) i Ird fxry4ji:9 •YoadS i r' I • ' I i • i L: :...1 --r I +z I 1 CR-5 1 FF.QPCISEB 1 I, tt# I I I I �' I 1 1.—t r: Y Ca � T _ ti.:-= '- I I I I I i I 1----1 I 1 I I o t Ii i = I II IE- p CR-4 1 I CR-5 I II I i I II I o I II I 1 I II +--- — — ----- --II �----1- I 1 1 l SUBJECT SITE N SCALE• 1" = 200' 11 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) 01.44, ORDINANCE NO 305 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-42-84 FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as• The west 243 feet of the North z of the Northwest of the Southeast i< of the Northeast k of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicant dedicate the north and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) that the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Davi Alexan e City Attorney era PZ-42-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 305 PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) I 1---- -----1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I - f ---------r 1 I F 1 CR-5 : I PROPOSED I I 1 1 I 1 1 i 1 --- -- - - ---I 1 EAST SCENIC STREET 1 -- 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Q I 1 I - 1 cn I I I � ~ I CR-5 CR-4 I u 1 Ii-- 1 to 1 I 1 1 d i SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 200' 1 i LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) C7- ITEM NO. 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 305 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 306, 27-43-24 THE APPLICANT IS TALBOT 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED ( 1 HE?AC 4O i �'0 - '-� r'� _ 1 city o pac/ie unction "9,QIZONP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 e_e.1 Approver for Agenda sal item MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading ^V Second Reading — --""— THROUGH: i , MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER .AZ public Hearing Old Business FROM: t,' CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business , SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM ____Consent Agenda PZ-43-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 306) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AN FIRST READING OCTOBER 16, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-43-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 306, is a request by the applicant Frank Talbot to rezone his property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a vacant 1 .25 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Smoketree Street and Grand Drive in Section 18. It is designated Medium Density Residential on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes, houses, and vacant land. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium Density Residential General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south and east thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Staff also recommends that this parcel not be allowed to develop into an RV or mobile home park unless otherwise permitted by the City. There is a protest petition filed by Robert and Patricia Anderson who own the parcels to the west and to the north of the rezoning site. Pursuant to Section 2808 of the Zoning Ordinance, it would require a three-fourths vote of approval by the City Council in order for the zoning to pass. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-43-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 306) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Vehon/Jorgensen 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-43-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 306, application of Frank Talbott for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . This particular rezoning is not compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. It is not compatible with the surrounding zoning" (If recommended for approval , the following stipulations are requested: ) 1. The applicant dedicate the south and east thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited; except as otherwise permitted by the City. CRN:mas Aft_ Aft, PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ-43 -VI where a zone change is proposedr from CfC'-rr,j x L tt�1:r, Lt0 rii0/1t`M- ��i".Mi e_ at IJIJ`.5 rr10W ' r C ( � �r ��!�rl 1) • (location B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of thos4isrec7DpItcs itry thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage 4 01&pp asi. es:olt. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse ` side of this petition. AUG 1 01984 D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both titeTsr n0LpekaTiOIG must sign. If we are partners, all general partners fl t ®jg LOPMENT E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: �_ 1 . 1r'7 VA) `7 2. /1—cf.Z,',,ii/t,; c t /fig G TL/v -11 Z (, _;/c ik . +• 1)1, 1 I/t f-?y c' 3. TPA;f/e1-•._ r t . ;--7-11 ei. tU/,//�f ''Cr- 1 Jr e COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIG ATUR BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 2. �' �`�j I�/�;� ���u��� r1'WU' • (71- - 3 `%6 -/OCR -3 -0 .yI E4. /-:) .--,4-c:•K •`'0 STATE OF / /7—, , ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. /01=4 day of , 19 ,c," COUNTY OF h.rvL_. ) by NOTARY PUBLIC My Corn-ass. 197 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: .., PZ-43-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 306 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR '=ENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) .. (- f Ord '': Exis'h�9 s Fy,:t. f �g{* 1, A lir or • 3. . Ili It t. i' TH TH I t 04 SUBJECT SITE ` N SCALE: 1" = 200' i_ r- LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) ' firw=m, ORDINANCE NO. 306 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-43-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, _ ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The South of the East of the South of the Northwest of the Southwest of the Northeast 4 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicant dedicate the south and east thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) that the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM D vi exander City ttorney PZ-43-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 306 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) b FST FOOTH I I I STRFFT w y Q Q E_ / '7 11- L A. ' a Q WEST SMOKETREE STREET r---r 3 1 Q I _J 1 W a) f = 1 ~ I cc z 1 1 I I I I I I TH I I TH I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 WEST TEPEE STREET I SUBJECT SITE NI SCALE. 1" = 200' r-i LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS (ENERAL RURAL) ram. s ITEM NO. 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 306 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . f k ()Lel...,21 ..., ,,...,, Z ( q if�,ZoNP (Oily a 4 9 ache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT July 11 , 1984 /A Approver tot Agenda t atop M First Reading 'i/)S f' MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading P // THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Public Hearing / Old Business FROM: C ,t4CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business _;°Consent Agenda SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-31-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 289) 1; AUGUST 7, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING 7 J' AUGUST 21 , 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION p I Project Description ✓b, Rezonin case PZ-31-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 289, is a request 9 p q by the applicants Dunrite Asphalt, Inc. through Bob Cosby to rezone their 3: property from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 12 acre parcel located on the southwest side of Highway 60, � � 800 feet northwest of Tomahawk Road in Section 28. It is designated i General Commercial Opportunit an d' m Density Residen on the General Plan. Surron ing and uses include ousel, industrial land, vacant property;-and the KOA trailer park. ....... Planning Department Comments This is an irregularly-shaped parcel with access only onto Highway 60. The General Commercial Opportunity Area designation in the General Plan extends approximately 200 feet parallel to the Highway, but the General Plan does make the provision that the commercial area may be considered to include part to all of any lot which is partially or totally within the 200 foot boundary. In this situation there exists a potential problem of adequate buffering or transition between CB-2 uses and the CR-3 zoned residential neighborhood (Palm Springs) to the west. In this conventional rezoning application, the impact on these neighboring residential properties cannot be accurately assessed. There are three protests to this rezoning. The Bigley' s lie outside the 150' radius, and the Miller letter is not notarized nor does it contain Catherine Miller's signature. Frances Heide' s protest is the only valid one. It only represents 5.7% of the area and, therefore, a 3/4' s vote is not required for approval in this case. : 1 6st , �k I w was.‘ ' a 3 , ,`'G �r ;) 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 C \ i ( n j 1' ti 3 � s Ns L7 3 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-31-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 289) July 11 , 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of July 10, .-. 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Vehon/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-31-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 289, application of Dunrite Asphalt, Inc. for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . That nothing over single story be constructed on this parcel of land. 2. That from a point 300' south of the Highway, parallel to the Highway, to the southern boundary of the property, that it be stipulated that nothing but a mini-storage use be used on that portion of the property. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . This will bring this property into compliance with the General Plan. 2. Due to the irregular shape of this property, it is a hard one to pick a use for the back end of this property, and in stipulating a mini-storage zoning this might serve as a good buffer and be a good use and a compatible use to the homes to the west. " CRN:mas PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ-_3% ? where a zone change is proposed fromge �' !i fl h%�c� to(2.r-. G4nrr'N,n i.. at_S.�JS/D.or/�� yo-2,:vi-`•N•n/ 1ifimi{r+;�+/r/��• 1�✓��"ac (location) °/�t ,'c R.TAAEL B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: �� 1 •.Avi- w4n/7—&1//SP1 ,Svi/-7 /f/64-1-/E47 ://1-0.) sore/ . (VE2- L. 2. Ii�Y>^iN5" �N T i7 v IUC � -'_ % � % �' rKJ siR�jffi9i!�/'< t) (. 7Jsr ddags 04 iCr.z..wi/ /✓ 3./N/6)42S/,//S$ 6y ///k/sT/P)/7// 'y 14/ad.L-i7 Cif eli E Ac'..CS S/t/.E/V /s7 4.PAil 8 /NEsS- 6R//17Ns7kYfyior ����� �i�� TF,F�IC t'si✓t Lf6/71-/r✓6 :1: LA 5. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINNTED) SIGNATU BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . M)/1/4A :/Yi'• !/E/�� �y � 7 - 7 - 2. . - - 3. 4. , STATE OF RFI?O,VM ) This ins ument was ac novel edged before me this ) SS. ,?) day of , 19 841 , COUNTY OF P1NAL ) by /tailEta 'yj') )dok- -m, meschitto NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. My Commission Expires Feb. 10.,1988 STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by • NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SECTION 2808 PROTEST PROVISION If the owners of twenty percent (20%) or more, either by area of the lots included in a proposed change, or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) from the street frontage of the opposite lots file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, it shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (3/4' s) of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the Council are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number for passage of the question shall be three-fourths (3/4' s) of the remaining membership of the Council , provided that such required number of votes shall in no event be less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established Council . Protests against amendments shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department, and shall be filed with that Department no later than five o'clock (5.00) p.m. on Tuesday one week before the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Signatures may be removed from any protest form no later - than five o'clock (5:00 ) p.m. on the Friday preceding the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Should either said Tuesday or Friday be a holiday, filing deadlines shall be extended to five o' clock (5:00) p.m. of the next working day.. PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ-31-84 where a zone change is proposed from cm rekn petal to CB-2 Gen Bu t SW side of Hwy 60 800 ' NW of Tomahawk Rd. 12 acre parcel (location) B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D:D We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband _ and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. rn EJ We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: °- 1 . Already have 2 centers within a 1 mile distance i7...' l � Q 2. RxcPss lightinT.& nnise W • 3, Business next to private dwellings will reduce value of property C 4. T.n c G o f view 5. Moved from city for country atmosphere. t'o net want to lose it. /7 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) /.IGN A BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . Andrew B. Bigley - 102 _ 03 _ 06104 Lot #7 2. 7Lorna A_ Bigley •7y5 ' K4- Ct' 102 - 03 - 06104 II II3. - - 4. - - Allek, STATE OF( , ) This instrument was ac owl ged before me this ) ss. 9 tz' day of , 19 fc( , COUNTY OF tics t- ) by _.41,y w 1 k _ �nn/✓1- - /r C • NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires May 31, 1988 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SECTION 2808 PROTEST PROVISION If the owners of twenty percent (20%) or more, either by area of the lots included in a proposed change, or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) from the street frontage of the opposite lots file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, it shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (3/4' s) of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the Council are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number for passage of the question shall be three-fourths (3/4' s) of the remaining membership of the Council , provided that such required number of votes shall in no event be less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established Council . Protests against amendments shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department, and shall be filed with that Department no later than five o'clock (5 00) p.m. on Tuesday one week before the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Signatures may be removed from any protest form no later - than five o'clock (5:00 ) p.m. on the Friday preceding the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Should either said Tuesday or Friday be a holiday, filing deadlines shall be extended to five o' clock (5:00) p.m. of the next working day. eN, ON RUSSELL D. MILLER 2500 WINDSOR MALL PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 Jul 3 1984 2 i: 71' ,"‘ ) Y941- 72 et-rt,7,,‘,„ 71 ,1,--c-- , / i -4 i , 67 rr-e-A-- 9et---;--L-c---4-e",-L (1:13ePnicit " . "''''-' -r'e-•'' -2:-e-c-71 Cr/ /1-2,e-4.-e.-c- 7-- iv 4,-(r-cc-e- ---/ I PZ — g/- r yr _/?--- ,--2--e--,2----,z--e-i--_- _ A .., , / 4...,.... -7,---, ()., 7--f /•.'"' A., 91 / .. tf-r'-- .jet.:-!_.4 ______J___6--Ii-e-/-,2-0-etcc-- -e-- •f;r:et-c-L"----4-7/1-e-- 71..et-1/1 / /7 -7re-v---1-/-et—le .. i 0 ,i_ct , -e.A.--ey- ( z- ----k‘ ,..e:/..e.„.4 7 , f 7, , 0-,7e &ft' ,fu, ^ s ORDINANCE NO. 289 AN ',<„zo i ra Nu AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AR ' lir , ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING -- . 3 M:, THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING 1-8- CASE PZ-31-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, ''-t - AN' REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY 3 - AIN' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, 00114AR_ . :'i__-, THra' ARIZONA, THAT ?__. . _ ._ _ 1__ [ SECTION I IN GENERAL i The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning ,u T' -l "' he Map for the parcel of land described as That part of the Southeast 1 of the Northeast 1 of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and `"` Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, lying south of U S Highway 60-70-80-89, described as follows Beginning at the southwest corner of the Southeast $ of the Northeast ; of said Section 28, thence along a line perpendicular to the southwesterly line of Highway 80 to its intersection with said highway right-of-way line, thence northwesterly along the right-of-way line of said Highway 80 to its intersection with the north line of the Southeast 1 of the Northeast 1 of said Section 28, thence westerly along the north line of the Southeast 1 of the Northeast ; of Section 28 to the northwest corner of the Southeast $ of the Northeast 1 of said Section 28; ,• thence south along the west line of the Southeast ; of the Northeast ; of said Section 28 to the point of beginning, be "' t ^et be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from v,R :- 1 ` GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. SEC I __ SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS Ai''a i-:r if. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of rc of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference a rl- Y are hereby repealed. SEr _ - __IL. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY f P ect If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ur. ' ,,tn e c, Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for a nv -.--a on , any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any ' r- any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the va , Dr validity of the remaining portions thereof P `_ .I 'D PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE J U'"`" C r JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor AT __. L ATTEST Va . `.- C- Kathleen Connelly C , — k City Clerk Amik Amok APPROVED AS TO FORM Davi I A."4161 City Attorney ORDINANCE NO 289 PAGE TWO OF TWO PZ-31-8u PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 289 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO GENERAL BUSINESS (CB-2) 0011N // ��� I/ r 1 i N / -2 : I CB-2 %/j//N PROPOSED CR-5 �� �Y, Q G / \\ I ` NO NN // PROPOSED .� �f CB-1 N N C8,2 \ "N.. I N U s "N. tiw \\ 1 Y �8T0 \/r I 8g LL/ES Ti E. ESTEIAN I \` I 1 I I N. 1 7 I1 I I ? I"CR- 1 //N / CB-1 4 GF,3. . '•:V —! E. GRANADA / I /�/ I + I / / TH I I I / I I I / I t.> ,) E, HONDOI ¢ / i 0 I / I--===_ I 0) / - - - - - ---II_CB-2 —,1 r I I I-----1- I <>. f I I 1 `-' I Ici-1 1 - KA E, KACH I`IA 1 1 L. -- I-,-J SUBJECT SITE y 1T SCALE. 1"=300' i 1� r 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) (— I /'► . Sr Nt it y, .K S .�.fr o -c-•.sue;:-c-01.7 „ . .:tr.. . - s = ` 7,41L PROPOSER}-itEZONE-: i 1 R L'(f( £7i r 'i' .c ter " • -, ..,:, 3 / h \3Y / tt 'fry , IY- J -'` _ y- ,.x i�- - • !/ K,Tf —kiY>e•T+"^,Teir. .A—v—I ,. %f' '._ 1 • v -amen4t •, ., '� �',--� 's-^ - "' ur - /� '. •rr �, - y Ty _� --- = i 44117'....,i4=c::::..;:'r'.. ..''......'......,, ,11.1...'7-"r'C'..7•.',.;-..17,..:-...4,---- ' '. '-'' : - Millia4////1/ ,,' ,.• -.;.•' %-"":::::''. . ' „ . ' ,:.N`r .1"-;;-----:-2.:.::"C.r. ..7.-'jt'; ".- "..:?••'''':-t•:•.-'Ll- //// :-X�. .;.nn. !.<c — >r., _.`' i // / /// ,y¢• ,=•,urn` • /','.',.,",,s,,...: .--.,.:,' .'.,.„.... '.,.',: •.`s.s..., ','.,.''.',-' :.:R5:.•4••••..,1-,:4„„.::,,i•,,:-,,-.,,..,,• . :..,.,„..,,, „„..„.,...., F� 7 M` il�tiiVa 1a, 11l ...ram kv Y.«s'-l"Hn" ; _ ! p . •., ,Id1 .. - , _l.. _..:'.. •.'.. '... ,. i:�eAscaea..r• ae• �/ /. ,.,„.. — t ' .r �� J,, 2 .1111 .- �= CI-1 E. KACH I L- ' I I - - -- I-,__I SUBJECT SITE • N SCALE: 1"=300' • > -1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) w -Ot( .') a-viN\-..-6) " 4: J A - y .,,/ ily` 'D rat `� ache c&unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 14, 1984 ...... MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: YMICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: 4' JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO AGENDA ITEM AUGUST 21 , 1984 PZ-31-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 289) Additional protests to the above rezoning have been filed with the Planning Department. The protest petitions of James E. Ross , Colburn C. and Bertha A. Holmes, Fidencio J. and Lydia A. Morales, and Frances Heide (who filed previously) are the only ones thus far that appear to be valid protests. Their property interests represent 22.7% of the area on a side within 150 feet of the rezoning site. Pursuant to Section 2808 of the City' s Zoning Ordinance, this rezoning can only be passed by a three-fourths majority vote of approval by the City Council . The Bigley and Meyers properties lie outside the 150 foot radius and the Miller letter was not notarized nor did it contain Catherine Miller's signature. Therefore, their protests were not counted. JAN:31 xc: File 1101 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning po cas PZ- j/_3/where a zone change is proposed 4' ,from &- to C -� at s�✓S/J�o/'/f1v ,‘v-14017. /tfVo�/Qlr/,1///k4 (location) /z /9c/ei /0,5we5` B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: 1 . 432ocK v/Ecc) of ,SvPE/i'S�i T/oN 2•4-m o vi N G 774e,G ACTvS 4,0(As Dc s n?th'$ L/l , C,vs E S giro S/QN, 3.eycr s 5 fJt)r. g FR Tn -FFIG J�s i,qc P"Hcc: � �vie% 4. (.e)i L.L ,Lo 43€R PRo1��K 7"`z' tiA-4 vE o% Hevti 5 f/►,' /9- FIRST C--LASS NC/ ff,goA ffoOD COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . CI—A M L.s _ o �S .� - 03 -OS/06 - 3. Pi p,NI\I NG Amok STATE OF Ak/Zo/1/dl ) This instrument wAs packn-owledged before me this SS. 7 f� day oaf� �9UGuS- - , 19 " , COUNTY OF P//y+A� ) by -R r-.c_s �- 62c-55 NOT RY PUB C MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: A;Xeri/gey / 67)- STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by • NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. Aal SECTION 2808 PROTEST PROVISION If the owners of twenty percent (20°;) or more, either by area of the lots included in a proposed change, or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) from the street frontage of the opposite lots file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, it shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (3/4' s) of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the Council are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number for passage of the question shall be three-fourths (3/4' s) of the remaining membership of the Council , provided that such required number of votes shall in no event be less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established Council . Protests against amendments shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department, and shall be filed with that Department no later than five o'clock (5:00) p.m. on Tuesday one week before the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Signatures may be removed from any protest form no later - than five o'clock (5:00 ) p.m. on the Friday preceding the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Should either said Tuesday or Friday be a holiday, filing deadlines shall be extended to five o' clock (5.00) p.m. of the next working day. �• PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- ,;j-;5t where a zone change is proposed from to C' . 13- at S,u'. -t o- 14-rVV4 '0C �Z1.c,�.,:. c R L -'A t� (1 ocati on(� � -r, 12.dt . U B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: 1 . ,, t:„� c�c t+ tt L 7 ` cam* ` -1 2. a t Cio-i,v , 1.-CX k _ 3. `_ze-i:�J .� 4- b ut1 -- -2- C_r1 C-12-- 4- ati° `ttz l 5. ` 'tom s, COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. �_ J, Sec. 2$-TWN -01N-Range 1 . Colburn C. Holmes �� ����--�--�,- ` v , °� =6 TR-BLIC Lat55 2. Bertha A. Holmes CL• 16-D^<VN-P-Gi' Pal m- raring Lot 55 3. 1355 South Cactus Rd. - - Apache Junction, Az 85220 4. - - .�.. STATE OF ) This instrument was ack wledged before met s , ) SS. day of , 19 � COUNTY OF mac. ) by (74 emu, 4 cJ, NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: a I STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged befolutT t171B4 ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by ; H-B BCVCLOPMCt4T NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: p SECTION 2808 PROTEST PROVISION If the owners of twenty percent (20%) or more, either by area of the lots included in a proposed change, or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) from the street frontage of the opposite lots file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, it shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (3/4' s) of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the Council are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number for passage of the question shall be three-fourths (3/4' s) of the remaining membership of the Council , provided that such required number of votes shall in no event be less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established Council . Protests against amendments shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department, and shall be filed with that Department no later than five o'clock (5:00) p.m. on Tuesday one week before the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Signatures may be removed from any protest form no later - than five o'clock (5:00 ) p.m. on the Friday preceding the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Should either said Tuesday or Friday be a holiday, filing deadlines shall be extended to five o' clock (5.00) p.m. of the next working day. .-. AZ— 3/_ ,Y y— .. .. F/i'Dm G A' • ' 3'2- where a zone change is proposed AT .Sw11DE OF fl fry 410 — • ,1. A'lv� T plliilft we ,Re (1 oca t i on) .s w 7. a fevi., r'Ja2 A�' f' � r�' t.-,...a yea dJ _ L iv of the lots included in Vadjacent in the rear or any for of those directly opposite i frontage of th-• .v., ' VED ' which is printe• • ' The reverse (Ws joint tenants, I ci ers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, al l general partners must 9 ii:. OF r LANN;NG E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: AND DEVELOPMENT 1 . 3/4.e.,„,..-2. a//1.4- 2. --ife > .,eiti 3. vat 4. 5. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINT D) SIGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . _ _ - - 2. r,0 .-,0�,0 af�. (1/(6 r?J4 6es ,.: r.,w -7,,, . l 6 - 0 3 - "L 3. -&/4/4- 74 /h0R,l-e_ I�.fpi— /° -z _ o ,3 - 4. - - ..�. STATE OF ) This instrument was ac owledged before me tis COUNTY OF ) SS. /a day Qf , 19 eS‘ , , ....E ) by ..4. ,...o0-1.�,-. w.-12 0 NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES• a G2 o, /9 C1/43-- _ a STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SECTION 2808 PROTEST PROVISION If the owners of twenty percent (20%) or more, either by area of the lots included in a proposed change, or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) from the street frontage of the 'opposite lots file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, it shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (3/4' s) of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the Council are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number for passage of the question shall be three-fourths (3/4' s) of the remaining membership of the Council , provided that such required number of votes shall in no event be less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established Council . Protests against amendments shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department, and shall be filed with that Department no later than five o'clock (5:00) p.m. on Tuesday one week before the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Signatures may be removed from any protest form no later than five o'clock (5:00 ) p.m. on the Friday preceding the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Should either said Tuesday or Friday be a holiday, filing deadlines shall be extended to five o' clock (5:00) p.m. of the next working day. PROTEST PETITION A. We herebyprotest rezoning case PZ-3/_g'y where a zone change is proposed from Aprf, A3, to r- k _(9 atz,l.U. i-1r) L" / 0),y .Ds/0G71/JN., 1 ocatiton--0,a,41f,4(AI j'c Rd. B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: ,, �j 1 . jr'; - _.(.7).i� ..zi c'�.* �/cr±PI) r /J a,u!-��� O�.h- zz , 2. � r 3. / r Q 4. 5. G COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) ] SIGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. a+4/ *iv--1-ii,cf,,Vut} /6 V_____-- 0 --/ --- ,6-7 0 0 2. 3. - 4. - - ��2, This instrument was acknowledged before me this s STATE OF L J SS. gfayf , X. , 19 rl COUNTY OF by j1,f3 _ NOTg PUBL C CE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: My Commission Expires Jan. 31. 1. d STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this S_S. day of , 19 , COUNTY: (} ,. ., .t��f ...�.,- by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: emN SECTION 2808 PROTEST PROVISION If the owners of twenty percent (20°,) or more, either by area of the lots included in a proposed change, or of those immediately adjacent 1 in the rear or any side thereof extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending one hundred and fifty feet (150' ) from the street frontage of the opposite lots file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, it shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (3/4' s) of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the Council are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number for passage of the question shall be three-fourths (3/4' s) of the remaining membership of the Council , provided that such required number of votes shall in no event be less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established Council . Protests against amendments shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department, and shall be filed with that Department no 1 4. later than five o'clock (5:00) p.m. on Tuesday one week before the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Signatures may be removed from any protest form no later - than five o'clock (5:00 ) p.m. on the Friday preceding the Council meeting at which the Council votes upon the proposed amendment. Should either said Tuesday or Friday be a holiday, filing deadlines shall be extended to five o' clock (5.00) p.m. of the next working day. �., ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES S/1' ITEM I/ MEETING OF q /g 4 MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: PThilf} . Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR yi COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR FIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO UNANIr^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL r► ITEM NO . 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 289 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 289 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING. Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 289 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-31-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL ITEM NO. 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 289 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clekr must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 289, BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING. St( BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 289 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-31 -84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL PQP`CHE✓G O + ' O ,f5t;40' : z gRiZONP `6.it o C pache 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: j %/MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM J CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO PACKET INFORMATION - SPETEMBER 18, 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - PZ-29-84 (DAMIANO) In response to dialogue between the applicant and City Council on this case at the September 4th public hearing, I have attached some information which may be helpful • 1. Excerpts from the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing of March 13, 1984 and the City Council public hearing of April 3, 1984 on PZ-3-84 (Rafferty) . This case, located across Highway 88 from Damiano's property, was granted rezoning to CB-2. 2. Excerpts from the City' s CB-1, CB-2, and CI-i district regulations which relate to the applicant' s intentions to use the property for a golf cart rebuilding facility. The specifics of what constitutes a permitted use in a particular zone is the responsibility of the Zoning Administrator, with the applicant having the right of appeal to the Board of Adjustment. CRN:mas Approver for Agenda ) D9tei Item First Reading ----cLL_ Second Reading - Public Hearing - Old Business - New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE1602) 9828002 Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 13, 1984 1 10 Jim Crofford represented the applicants and stated that they want to rezone two parcels to CB-2 to use or sell for future business. 11 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition of the case, he asked for staff recommendation 12 Mr Nakagawa stated there was no objection and recommended a dedication of right-of-way 13 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 14 Sansoni/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-2-84, also known as • Proposed Ordinance No. 254, application of Donna and Robert Loewenstein for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations are- . The applicant dedicate the west seventeen feet (17') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes "The reason for the recommendation is _ It is currently consistent with the General Plan " IF The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 15 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-3-84, Proposed Ordinance No 256, a rezoning from CR-1 to CB-2 He asked for staff briefing 16 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 17. Chairman asked if the applicant would like to speak on this case 18. Mike Kovacs stated that Mr Short would also be involved in the project as a co-owner representing Mr Rafferty 19 Roger Short said he appreciated all the staff assistance received and they want to build a boat storage •.-w ►:,.c:,:,.•:. ;a ;:.�,,:.�.�n and maintenance facility He commented that a precedent had been set by the existing - �- —^—- CB-2 uses 20. Mr Taylor asked if he had any objections to a planned development as suggested by staff. 21 Mr Kovacs replied that he had been involved with PD's and they are very expensive and not feasible for this project He added that they will strive to keep the area and recreation route as it is now 22 Mr Taylor asked about stipulating screening. 23. Mr. Kovacs replied that there is no obnoxious use planned as it will be for boat storage and a service bay area He commented that CB-1 would not be t able to facilitate the type of development they want He added that CB-2 zoning is there 24 Mr Sansoni noted that the transmittal stated that the property was 500' south of Lost Dutchman which was in error r r Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 13, 1984 25 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for staff recommendation 26 Mr Nakagawa stated that the area should be allowing recreational/commercial uses, but that some control should be applied He added that ' '` >' a dedication of right-of-way was recommended for the north fifty feet of the subject property. He noted that the applicant has applied for a General Plan amendment which is under separate review and amendments are normally considered on an annual basis —- 27 Mr. Taylor asked what staff recommendation was 28. Mr Nakagawa replied that the staff is not opposed to the PD designation being applied. 29. Mr. Sansoni was concerned about adequate ingress-egress 30. Mr Nakagawa stated that a safe-sight distance was needed - -- in each direction. 31. Mr. Taylor asked if this was to go PD if it would fall into the new Ordinance - / 32 Mr. McNulty replied that the new Ordinance will not come up for public hearing until a future meetin. --».�•—� a^<^ '""� , and then it goes to the City Council 33 Chairman asked if the applicant had any rebuttal ." 34. Mr Kovacs stated that access will be a problem no matter what the property is zoned He added that Lost Dutchman would possibly be graded through in the next two years and that it was a main arterial He added that if they are asked to take a lesser zone, they will wait until October for the General Plan to be reviewed. He said that local business zoning was not heavy enough for the area and that he was asking for what others in the area already had. He commented that he would take CB-1 if it could be upgraded to CB-2 later 35 Mr McNulty noted that if they did and the property was sold it would revert back to CB-1 unless sold to someone to continue an existing business. 36 Mr Vehon asked if stipulations could be put in that no manufacturing be done - - --- _ 37. Mr. McNulty replied that if it can be done under the zone they cannot change it 38 Mr Polomskey noted that under the City Ordinance they can either grant CB-2 or not grant it 39 Mr Vehon commented it could be granted with a stipulation that it would be reviewed within one year 40 Mr Kovacs stated he had no problem with the reverter suggested by Mr McNulty 41 Chairman there being no further rebuttal or discussion, he called for a motion. } 42. Polomskey/Vehon M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City of Apache Junction, Arizona 1 Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 13, 1984 that in rezoning case PZ-3-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 256, application of Daniel Rafferty through Mike Kovacs for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are 1. The applicant dedicate the north fifty feet (50' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes 2 That an approval for a General Plan amend- ment or a specific plan be approved for this site to General Commercial. "The reasons for this recommendation are 1 The request is not in compliance with the • General Plan, but will probably be in compliance in the future ( 2 It would be the highest and best use of the property at this time." The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) �- 43 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-4-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 257, a rezoning from GR to iL CB-2 He asked for staff briefing. 44 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 45 Chairman asked if the applicant was present to speak on the case 46. Kenneth Ragan stated he intended to develop the property himself and it would be either a mobile home • sales or storage area after the Freeway is developed 47 Mr Taylor noted that the two parcels north of Southern were not in a commercial opportunity zone • 48. Mr. Ragan commented that the isolated GR parcel owner was not opposed to the rezoning. 49. Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor. 50 Norman Thompson stated he has a financial interest in this property and that residential would be out of place here He added that approval would mean - additional income to the city 51 Chairman there being no one else to speak in favor, he asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition 52. Dan Peterson stated he lives outside of the City limits and wanted to know how this would affect his permit for a fence forty feet from his property line and how it would change his horse privileges with Solana cutting through 53. Chairman noted that the five-year plan has the Freeway only to Power Road and Southern only being completed to Ellsworth AI ilk ,024. c Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa, briefed the Council on the rezoning case from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, located on the east side of Ironwood Drive, 200 feet and 600 feet south of Apache Trail in Section 20. Mr. Jim Crawford, 101 S. Ironwood Drive, Apache Junction, representing Donna L and Robert L. Loewenstein, requested approval of the rezoning application. AIN Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Devel- opment and Coordinating Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission both recommend approval with dedication of right-of-way. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 254, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 254, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 256, PZ-3-84 RAFFERTY (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the rezoning application from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, located on the north side of Highway 88 and on the south side of Lost Dutchman Boulevard in Section 15. Mr Mike Kovacs, 710 S. Lawson, Apache Junction, introduced Mr Roger Short, a co-owner in the project, to give a presentation. Mr Roger Short, 1256 S. Buena „� _ ,„.�M1 ;;__ _�,=:�,.-,, , Vista, Apache Junction, requested approval of the rezoning for the purpose of a recreational enterprise. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon ( Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr Nakagawa stated that the Development and Coordinating Committee recommends approval with stipulating dedications for public roadways, and the Planning and Zoning Commission also recommend approval, and that this may require a Generai Plan amendment. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 3, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr Kovacs asked Mr. McNulty to explain the alternate options. City Manager McNulty explained that 1 in the event that the rezoning will benefit the community rather than a small number of people, a rezoning may be made without a General Plan amend-:a ment. 001\ Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public, and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 256, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows 1 ORDINANCE NO 256, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING . THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-3-84 FROM CR-2 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING 1 ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 257, PZ-4-84 RAGAN, STAGNARO, AND THOMPSON (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public.- - - Mr Nakagawa briefed the Council on the application for rezoning from General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, located on the north side of Southern Avenue between Acacia and Starr Roads in Section 27. Mr Kenneth Ragan, 2386 N. Valley ( Drive, Apache Junction, requested approval of the proposed use of trailer sales. Vice Mayor Eidson wished to know if this use could be done with a CB-1 zoning, with the concern of detrimental use to the church located across from the parcel. Mr Ragan stated that nothing detri- mental would be placed on this property. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr Nakagawa stated that the Devel- " ti'- opment and Coordinating Committee has no objections, and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. - Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 257, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 3, 1984 PAGE 5 ARTICLE 15 CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE: SEC. 1501 USES PERPMITTED: a. Any use permitted in Section 1401 (TR Transitional Am. Zone). b. The following uses , which in any CB-1 zone shall be conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building unless otherwise specified and any use operating as a store, shop or business, shall be a retail establishment and all products - produced on the premises shall be sold at retail on the premises Antique store Apparel store Art needlework or hand-weaving establishment Art gallery or store Auto parking lot (within or without building) Bakery Bank, safe depository or trust company Barber or beauty shop____ :ar Bicycle shop (no sales or servicing of motor scooter or motors Iles Book, newspaper, magazine, stationery, art or drawing supply store Cafe, lunch room (provided no dancing is allowed and no alcoholic beverages sold except beer and wine) Catering service Church Cigar store Cleaning, dyeing, laundry, collection agency Clinic Club or lodge (non-profit) Community service agency Confectionary store Custom dressmaking, millinery, hemstitching or pleating Custom weaving or mending Day nursery or child-care center Dealer in coins, stamps or similar collector' s items Delicatessen store Dental or medical laboratory Department store, variety store s Amor - 39 - A.. A.. • ARTICLE 16 CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE: SEC. 1601 USES PERMITTED: a. Any use permitted in Section 1401 (TR Transitional Zone) and in Section 1501 (CB-1 Local Business Zone) . b. Advertising sign, structure or billboard, subject to Article 22. Amusement or recreation enterprise (within a completely enclosed structure) including billiard or pool hall , bowling alley, dance hall , gymnasium, penny arcade, shooting gallery, skating rink, sports arena. Amusement or recreational enterprise (outdoor) including archery range, miniature golf or practice driving or putting range, games of skill or science, pony riding ring without stables, swimming pool or commercial beach or bathhouse, tennis court. Auction, public (no animals) Auditorium or assembly hall Auto rental garage Auto repair, mechanical or steam washracks , battery service (no body or fender work, painting or upholstery, except as incidental ) Bar, cocktaiFlounge,n�gl-it—club, tavern Baths (Turkish, Swedish, steam, etc. ) Blueprinting, photostating Boats, storage or rental Burglar alarm service Carpenter shop Cigar manufacturing (custom hand-rolled) Cleaning establishment, if only two clothes cleaning units of not more than 40 pounds rated capacity, and using cleaning fluid which is non-flammable and non-explosive at temperatures below 138 5 degrees Fahrenheit. Club: Athletic, private, social , sport or recreational (operated for profit) except sports stadium or field. Engraving, photo-engraving, lithographing Fair, carnival or tent show for not longer than 15 days , if sufficient parking area for patrons is provided. Fortune-telling - 43 - 001 Garage, public (for commercial use) Juke box or coin machine business (limited to assembly, repair and servicing) Laundry, steam or wet-wash Lumber yard, retail (provided no machinery is used other than a rip saw and cut-off saw) Locksmith, tool or cutlery sharpening, lawnmower ^ repairing, fix-it or handyman shop Massage establishment, reducing salon or gymnasium Mattress shop for repairing only (no renovating) Merchandise broker's display, wholesale -Motorcycle or motor scooter repair or storage Mortuary or embal-ming establishment or scR-0-01' Newspaper office Oxygen equipment, rental or distribution Pawn shop Piano repairing Plumbing, retail custom Printing or publishing Record recording studio or sound score production (no manufacturing or treatment of records) Refrigeration installation or service School or college (operated as a commercial enterprise for dancing or musical instruction, industrial or trade school teaching operations „I or occupation permitted in this zone). Sheetmetal or tinsmith shop Sign painting shop Mini-storage building only Trade show, industrial show or exhibition Transfer or express service Upholstery shop Wallpaper sales , paper hanging `. Sale, rental or display of: --Air or parts ---Automobiles_ Barber's supplies or beauty shop equipment Butcher's supplies Clothing or accessories (wholesale) Contractor' s equipment or supplies Drugs or medical , dental or veterinary supplies (wholesale) Farm equipment or machinery Feed (wholesale) Garage equipment • Hardware (retail or wholesale) \r0 - 44 - AIN Hotel equipment or supplies Household appliances, sewing machines, etc. (wholesale) Machinery, commercial and industrial Monuments or tombstones (no wholesale) Office equipment (safes, business machines , etc ) (wholesale) Orthopedic appliances (trusses, wheel chairs, etc. ) Painting equipment or supplies (paint, varnish, etc. ) Pet (no boarding or hospital ) Plastic or plastic products (wholesale) Plumbing, heating and ventilating fixtures or supplies Restaurant or soda fountain equipment or supplies Second-hand goods. Personal , furniture, books , magazines, automobiles, but not second-hand auto parts Tents or awnings Trailers Trunks or luggage (wholesale) Upholsterer's supplies Venetian blinds Window shades d. Light manufacturing or assembling incidental to ji retail sales from the premises, provided that not more than 25% of the floor is occupied by businesses engaged in manu- facturing, processing, assembling, treatment, installation and repair of products. -/� e. Wholesaling of products permitted in Section 1501-b �•. unless specifically prohibited, with storage space not exceeding 1,500 square feet of floor area. f Cemetary or crematory, provided that cemetaries for human remains shall be located on a site of not less than five acres , and for animal pets not less than one acre, and that no crematory be erected closer than 500 feet from any boundary of said site adjoining property in rural or residential zone. g. Drive-in theater, provided that the face of any projection screen be not visible from any county road or any street or route shown on the adopted Map of Major Thoroughfares and Proposed Routes (Map C, Section 502) , which is within 500 feet of said screen; provided further that the site for said theater shall consist of not less than 10 acres of land and be a single tract or parcel not intersected or divided by any street, alley, or by property belonging to other owners ; that any lights - 45 - Ink Amok _ ARTICLE 17 CI-1 LIGHT INDUSTRY AND WAREHOUSE ZONE: SEC. 1701 USES PERMITTED: a. Any use permitted in Section 1501-b (CB-1 Local ,.� Business Zone) and in Sections 1601-b and 1601-c (CB-2 General Business Zone). b. One dwelling unit for a watchman or caretaker and his family. �—� c. Any of the following if conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building 1 . Manufacture, compounding processing, packaging or treatment of: Bakery goods, candy, cosmetics , dairy products , drugs and pharmaceutical products, soap (cold process only) and food products, except fish or meat products, sauerkraut, vinegar, yeast and the rendering or refining of fats and oils. 2. Manufacture, compounding, assembling or treatment of articles or merchandise from the following previously prepared materials: Bone, broom corn, cellophane, canvas, cloth, cork, feathers, felt, fiber, fur, glass, hair or bristles, horn, leather, paper, plastics or plastic products, precious or semi- precious metals or stones, shell , textiles, tobacco, wax (paraffin, tallow, etc. ) , wood (excluding sawmill or planing mill ) , yarns, paint (not employing a boiling process). 3. Manufacture of: Glass, pottery or other similar .0. ceramic products (using only previously prepared sand or pulver- ized clay, and kilns fired only by electricity or gas) , musical instruments, toys, novelties, rubber or metal stamps. 4. Manufacture and maintenance of: Electric and neon signs, billboards, commercial advertising structures and displays, light sheet metal products , including heating or cool - ing, and ventilating ducts and equipment, cornices, eaves and the like. 5. Automobile or trailer assembling, painting, up- holstering, rebuilding, reconditioning , sale of used parts , truck repair or overhauling, tire rebuilding or recapping, battery manufacture and the like. 6. Blacksmith and welding shop or machine shop (excluding punch presses over 20 tons rated capacity, and drop - - 48 - oak. Amok i oil 4 ,\ ,.. „.„ 0 ,,,, , , (15ily o �a ac.ic &unctzon DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 7, 1984 MEMORANDUM�Q: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL /n THROUGH: ,0 MICHAEL J. McNULTY , CITY MANAGER FROM: Cir%CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-29-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288) AUGUST 7, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Case Description Rezoning case No. PZ-29-84 Proposed Ordinance No. 288, is a request by the applicants A. Richard and Jennie Damiano to rezone their property from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 4.15 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Highway 88 and E. Hildalgo Street in Section 15. It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include Mary's Country Store, Kovacs ' Korner, vacant land, and a single-family home. The applicant had stated on the rezoning application that the rezoning is being requested to "sell and repair golf carts." The letter dated July 16 , 1984 from Mr. R.D. Damiano (the applicants 's son) describes the intended activities to be established on the subject property. The applicant has also filed for abandonment of East Hildalgo Street to the north of the subject property and North Bowman Road to the west. This abandonment request is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on September 4, 1984, so the matter of necessary street dedications will be resolved prior to Council consideration of this rezoning. etJ Approver for Agenda_—_, /Date Item # First Reading Jf yl� Second Reading _ Public Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda O01 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) August 7, 1984 Page Two Planning Department Comments The staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south thirty- three feet (33' ) and the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject property r� for public roadway and associated purposes if Hildalgo Street and Bowman Road is abandoned. If these streets are not abandoned staff would also recommend the dedication of the necessary property along the North and West sides of the property. Due to the designation on the adopted General Plan of Local Commercial Opportunity Area , the staff would recommend rezoning to CB-1 , but not CB-2. Although a discussion concerning the intended uses for a property being considered for a conventional rezoning is usually irrelevant, in this case, the applicants' possible misperception of the requirements of both the CB-1 and CB-2 districts may render him incapable of establishing his intended use of the property should rezoning be granted. To operate in a CB-1 zone, it would be necessary for the City Council to adopt a resolution as authorized in Section 1501(b) of the Zoning Ordinance to permit sale and repair of electric golf carts in a CB-1 zone provided that, in the opinion of the City Council , the use is "not more obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the particular community than the enter- prises or business above enumerated." (List of uses in Section 1501(b) .) It is the opinion of the Planning Department staff that the sale and repair of electric golf carts would not be more obnoxious , however, any such use would have to comply with the CB-1 regulations which require that the business shall be a retail establishment and all products produced on the premises shall be sold at retail on the premises. Resolution No. 84-36 is included for your consideration . Unfortunately, from the applicants' standpoint, from the information contained in the letter of July 16th and through conversations with the applicant, this CB-1 designation would not be appropriate for their intended use, and there is the possibility that even CB-2 would not be appropriate as reflected in the memo from the Zoning Administrator of July 19th which is included in this packet, stating that CI-1 zoning would be necessary for rebuilding and reconditioning of golf carts. I apologize for the length of this commentary, but felt it would be help- ful background information to eliminate confusion likely to arise during the public hearing. The Honorable Mayod.and City Council — Request for Agenda tem PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) August 7, 1984 Page Three Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of July 10, 1984, voted to approve the following motion: (P1/S Taylor/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that rezoning case PZ-29-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 288, application of A. Richard and Jennie Damiano for their property described as , a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-i Single Residence to CB-1 Local Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. The applicant dedicate the north, south, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) and the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. Enter with this Motion presented to the City Council recommendation , that this type of business that the applicant desires to put on this be considered an appropriate business for this type of commercial zoning. The reasons for this recommendation are: This does comply with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction. This area is definitely a commercial area and any other type of rezoning would not be appropriate. " Recommended Motions for PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) . Option #1 ( If CB-2 zoning is to be approved) BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , that rezoning case PZ-29-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 288, application of A. Richard and Jennie Damiano for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, be and hereby is approved. The Honorable Mayot and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) August 7, 1984 Page Four Option #2 (If CB-1 zoning is to be approved) BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , that rezoning case PZ-29-84 , Proposed Ordinance No. 288, application of A. Richard and Jennie Damiano, for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, be and hereby is amended and approved to CB-1 Local Business Zone. In addition , along with the above motion, if CB-1 zoning is to be approved: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No. 84-36 , "A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT ELECTRIC GOLF CART SALES AND REPAIR ARE NOT MORE OBNOXIOUS OR DETRIMENTAL THAN THOSE PERMITTED USES AS SET FORTH IN THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 1501(b) , AND THAT ELECTRIC GOLF CART SALES AND REPAIR ARE DECLARED TO BE PERMITTED USES IN SECTION 1501(b) OF THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE," be and hereby is approved. CRN:j1 PLUMGOLF CAR , used 6 Reiaitt 5606 East McKellips Road / Mesa, Arizona 85205 / Telephone* (602) 985-0111 July 16, 1984 Mrs. Chatiieto Newcomers Pxanvu.ng D-uLect wf City o6 Apache jct. , AZ Re: PZ-29-84( Pnopotoed Ond.#288 Dean Mrs. Newcomers: With negwtd to ,the rse-zoning o.6 my atheo' (A. R. Dam4.ano) teat ptcopersty in Sect-Lon 15, 1 w-iii attempt to detoctube .the act.cvtit,ce's that w.c l be pelc5onmed by D & T GoI6 Cate on that pnapetzty. The pn,c.matcy me o6 the p' e.mLoeo wiet be the .to.a.2 rsebuttdx.ng ob go.26 caAis. We ptan to have a 6enced compound o.6 appnox cma-tety 5,000 -to 10,000 'sq. 6t. to o-tone ,the canto .to be tz.ebwi,Pt. The bwi.Pd.tng w-U be o6 is.teet consttc.uc con containing 3,000 -to 5,000 .-sq. 6t. Within .th-z s atcea, woniamen wiit tcemove the body piece's, i.e. 6ende'io, COW. , bumpous; otheAto wilt remove and nebuitd the mo.toi o. The chato,c,o ,cis then nebu tt, toptungto, (jnovit toutopento.con and tsteen,cng -co neptaced on nepa,uz_ed ato -Uo needed. A new on nepa Aed body wit.2 be into-tatted and the can wilt be bnough-t .to a topnay booth whe&e it wilt be tcepa.cvLted. The cats then en ento .the bw d-up 'stage, whetce the mo-tort, ba tetu.eto, titre's, -top, tight's, up- ^^ hoLo-terry, carpet, w.cndzhietdto, etc. , ate -onto.a ted on the veh-Lcteto. The cats ,cto ,then teJo-ted and nead.ced tiotc Coate. I hope th.vs witt help to c eatc,cy the utoe we intend bon .the pnopenly. I{ I can be o6 any othvt atortistance to you, p1eause cal.2 me at 985-0111 ors 985-0622. � s, �____ __ _ vxtw , yq;un i R. . D iano RDD/bd % / "') ":,,'r. 1 ,..1 cc / . ,.,1 ! I .i4 2' i C2I PLi`�1 : 111NL7 . Waled — Smola (pACHE n� z it y 7yache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT July 16, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: LEO FRAZIER, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FROM. ,i7/CHUCK NEWCOMER, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S INTERPRETATION RELATED TO PZ-29-84 For a rezoning application (PZ-29-84) the applicant has stated that he intends to set-up, in a CB-2 zone, an operation which would involve the substantial refurbishment and repair of used golf carts. These carts would then be transported to another location for sale, with some sales possible at this repair center. Question: Would such an operation be permitted in the CB-2 zone; and what type of restrictions would apply? CRN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 O� ` -_ /.4444) J f ,�,��zv� 'z,, ct 7iacI e unctaan July 19, 1984 :.-.: Lae N 1 �,n. ^ i. ., ae JUL 191984 DEPT OF PLAN' ,?'a TO: Director of Planning AND DEVELCF;.—;;T FROM:ed RE: Zoning Administrator PZ-2 -8 9 4 In response to your request, I have researched the zoning ordinance to determine what zone would be appropriate and necessary for rebuilding and reconditioning golf carts. It is my opinion that this use falls under Sec. 1701 c 5; thus would require CI-1 (Light Industry) zoning and would have to be conducted from within a completely enclosed building. Also, since the use apparently falls into the aforemention section, it would be prohibited in any more restrictive zone pursuant to Sec. 302 g. LF:sr 4001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 a TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 PZ-29-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288 I PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE 0,e/ 75i29, 2roac<5 off' 5 � r ] / I lyJ°�y/ / I CB-2 I - � CB-2 / i- / I I / E, H DALGO STREET • _ z _" �w F ¢- .«�ns-5"ant irn: 1. � +.L'i�+s..r+tt..� t ,�., si.. ,: > ..rJ- s s a. -.•r% i ,, , t . ,..i :ii :1'. o ir 1: _ Q 1` t ; ,5 O r, :::. a 11% y. ,.. A Z y ' ,. I OTH I L S;cg .:3.: % f SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1"=200' r 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS CR-1 SINGLE FAMILY I—_I RESIDENCE) wormir PIN ORDINANCE NO 288 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-84 FROM CR-i SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: The South # of the Northeast ; of the Northeast A of the Northwest A of Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south thirty-three feet (33'), and the east forty feet (40') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST• Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Davi F. Alexander City Attorney PZ-29-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288 PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE .•., TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE _ ____ DUTCHMAN : D 1 I / / I / / ' cB-2 i / 1 I / CB-2 / / I cbs) / / I // \\\ E, HIDALGO STREET / E. WINDSONG STREET m n fr 0 I Q ./k.o aoix N =Z W U r, ao U wm _ U Z QZ ~up Z E. FOOTHILL STREET 1 SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1"=200' r- 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAIND:R IS CR-1 SINGLE FAMILY L _I RESIDENCE) amormr RESOLUTION NO 84-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR MO CiTY COUi•NCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA_ DECLAPI"'( THAT ELECTRIC GOLF CART SALES AND REPAIR •RE t'OT "ORE () NOXIOUS OR DETRIMENTAL THAN THOSE PERMITTED USES AS SET FORTH IN THE APACHE JLNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONIP'f ORDINANCE, SECTION 1501(b), AND THAT ELECTRIC GOLF CART SALES AND REPAIR ARE DECLARED TO BE PERMITTED USES IN SECTION, 1501(b) OF THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE `\ ` WHEREAS, the Manning and Zoning Commission at public hearing held on PZ-29-84, July 10, 1984, recommended to the City Council that electric golf cart sales and repair should be considered an appropriate use in a CB-1 zone, and WHEREAS, Section 1501(b) of the City of Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance states "Other similar enterprise or business of the same class, which in the opinion of the City Council, as evidenced by resolution or record, is not more obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the particular community\than the enterprises or businesses above numerated", and WHEREAS, Section 1501(b) does lust as permitted uses, "Bicycle shop (no sales or service of motor scooter And motorcycles); Electrical appliance store; Sporting goods, Hunting and fishing equipment store, and Gasoline service station (incidental repairing only)", and WHEREAS, Section 1501(b) does not refer to electric golf cart sales and repair NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that as authorized by Section 1501(b), the City Council is of the opinion that "Electric Golf Cart Sales and Repair" is not more obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community than the enterprises or businesses enumerated as permitted uses irp the CB-1 Local Business Zone and are therefore declared to be a permitted use under Section 1501(b) of the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Or$.,nance PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 0 THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ilD"a)v. \AC �/ excia�(4Cr��°,k/ City Attorney ////// 4) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES �f �b ' DI(' _ 0)) , ' j 9 ITEM ## 1 MEETING OF (0 �1"l `� MOTION BY; SECONDED BY; D �02/1/1--• YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCI LrAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUrlC I U^AN TAYLOR v COUNCILMAN DAMIANO /ICE MAYOR EIDSON t1AYOR CL KL UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL p p ITEM NO . 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 288 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 288 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 288 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL ITEM NO . 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 288 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 288 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . S^ 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 288 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL Ask INIlk (1:11\CHE le/ I 2 U ' "9RIZO0- `Dity a ache cunctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 15, 1984 Approver for Agenda ,ram Date!I/ item # First Reading 2�/A/, MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading THROUGH: / ', , Public Hearing MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Old Business FROM: ,,; CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING — New Business (, Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-36-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 298) SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning Case No. PZ-36-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 298, is a request by the applicants Duane Beeman and Cleo Johnson of D&C Development through Keith Stachar to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a developed .95 acre parcel located on the southeast corner of Roosevelt Street and Ironwood Drive in Section 20. It is designated General Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include a church, car rental business, apartments, RV park, mobile home rentals, and a house. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the General Commercial General Plan designation for the site. The staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west seventeen feet (17' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 14, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion. (M/S Taylor/Rogers 7-0-0) 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 it ,•.. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-36-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 298) August 15, 1984 Page Two "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-36-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 298, application of Duane Beeman and Cleo Johnson of D&C Development through Keith Stachar for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the west seventeen feet (17' ) of the subject property for public roadway and assoicated purposes. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . This rezoning is in compliance with the General Commercial General Plan designation for this site. 2. It is compatible with commercial tenure of the area. 3. It is the best use of the property at this time. " CRN:mas _._ .. - .._ -`_..x PZ-36-84 • - - PROPOSED ORDINANCE MO. 298 •- r - PROPOSED REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) ' ' TO GENERAL BUSINESS (CB-2) .-. £)c, 7 :",y loads • 1.::4i lir .. I L TH IL'.. v . • . .. . _ tom i - _ -_ -- _ -- ------ — — —7 k., ______A__ , CB I ''st .� I CB 1 sx 4- = II((' i 1 .-.R'� l '•.. `"-tn i. .-=�'A .O ,...�.+..- ..�y�.r'... L — SUBJECT SITE hi SCALE' i"=200' r I — LIMITS OF ZONING (REI1AINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) I_ I ORDINANCE NO 298 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-36-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: Lot 17, Block 1, Apache Addition Acres, according to Book 5 of Maps, Page 32, records of Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the west seventeen feet (15') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. (l: D vi exa e City Attorney L PZ-36-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE MO. 298 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO GENERAL BUSINESS (CB-2) ,.r I- L - - -1 TH I I----J_ I 1 cR-5 i w t > W. ROOSEVELT STREET ra 0 0 - -1 ZI CB-2 I CB-2 1 L_— — —— — — ——---——I I----_ —— —— — —— —— W. APACHE TRAIL I - SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1"=200' r i - LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) li I_1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0( k • if ITEM # 1 () MEETING OF _ /`A t MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: clj4r-YYL ' 1 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILf°A1`! DAMIANO tit CNN-CT!r�n�,_,i aIEELSMITH I VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL V E UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1).7( Q zdeu ,‘A\ ITEf1 # MEETING OF 111( MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Ptiq YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO SMITh. �R- tan ran n V CC __I Ih1 i VTCTCfRFfeE= UNA,T^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Aftik ITEM NO . 10 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 298 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) kStep 2CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 298 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 298 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .-., APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-36-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL ITEM NO . 10 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 298 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 298 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . St BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 298 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-36-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL /11k O 't' n► 1 )1 ; r_ ,-- O, t -,, \_,, _4„...., ..„-_,. ,-. \\,,,, ; i ,,.gyp o czt u � pac is unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 11 , 1984 Approver for Agenda ' .m. Oateta Item # First Reading /`' W /l MEMORANDUM TO:_ HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading / _. Public Hearing THROUGH: { ��. (MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER OId Business 7 ° New Business FROM: „; CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Consent Agenda Ce SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO CITY COUNCIL PACKETS SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PZ-38-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 300 I thought it may be relevant to this rezoning to include the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council public hearing on rezoning case PZ-10-84. The site of that rezoning is the northeast corner of Ironwood and Broadway. The rezoning to CB-2 was approved by the City Council in May, 1984, after receiving a favorable recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. From a practical standpoint the impact of CB-2 zoning on the neighborhood in case PZ-10-84 does not appear to be substantially different than that which could occur if CB-2 was approved for PZ-38-84. .-. Case PZ-17-83 rezoned the property directly across Ironwood from the subject site to CB-1 by Planned Development. Since the preliminary PD plans for the property are very unspecific, the commercial uses to which that property may be put are undefined at this time, but would be generally limited to CB-1 type uses. Staff Comments: This issue in this case seems to be whether the General Plan designation for local commercial is reasonable given the fact that the two intersection corners north of Broadway are zoned CB-2 , and whether the merits of Mr. Hudson's application warrant an increased intensity of development than that designated on the General Plan. CRN:jl ,01 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 ,111 Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 • 21. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case. 22 Marty Jones represented the applicants. He showed the 2333 N. Central, Phx. proposed site plan for the extension of Phase I and explained some minor changes 23. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in P opposition, asked for staff comments 24 Mr Nakagawa stated that this would conform to the medium --- density designation He said there was a protest petition on file, but no signers were within 150' of the project 25. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 26 Polomskey/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning • Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-1-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 252, application of Kenneth Bakke and Michael Purcell for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH/PD Trailer Homesite by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are- ' 1 That final plat approval will be required prior to final PO approval in order for the • City to obtain dedicated roadways • 2. Theperimeter wall be recessed- additionally at locations where existing washes enter and exit the site. 3. The applicant submit a report from the State Health Department for approval of the sewage plant in Phase I to handle the additional flow from Phase II. 4 The applicant comply with all requirements of the City Engineer and Fire Department 5 Standards and specifications shall comply with the City Development Guide. 6 The applicant comply with the requirements for final Planned Development approval prior to the issuance of building permits. "The reasons for this recommendation are 1 The request conforms with Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance 2 It complies with the General Plan medium density designation. 3. It is compatible with the surrounding area " The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) 27 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-10-84, rezoning from GR to CB-2 and TH in Section 20, and asked for staff briefing. • 28 Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case Ilk AiII\ Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 29. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 30. Marty Jones outlined the history behind this rezoning case. He showed a plan for the development and presented a plan for 4th Avenue, and said the - - entrance to the park would be on 4th Avenue -4q:- " %--c::. ,_ 1" , 31. Mr. McNulty stated that this was the first time the City had seen the plan and was not prepared to Amok comment on it or to accept it. He added that 4th Avenue should go all the way through 32. Mr. Jones stated that his clients were willing to put it all the way through, but that the present plan was to accomodate the neighbors who did not want it to go through 33 Mr McNulty commented that the area cannot be developed until this matter is resolved He added that - they are considering only the rezoning tonight 34 Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor 35 Bill Plum said he was' neither in favor or opposed He 638 S. Silver said that he would like to see what type of privacy wall would be utilized and that he would like to see the property developed 36 Chairman there being no one to speak in opposition, he :"9 "Y'-,',=' TM?' `.= asked for staff comments 37 Mr Nakagawa stated there was no objection and recommended ` stipulating dedication of rights-of-way. . r 38 Chairman commented that once the zoning was granted there fwas no guarantee unless it was a PD. He asked if the applicants would be willing to go PD 39 Mr Jones replied that the area would not comply with the PD Ordinance and that the applicants have been in this process for at least a year He said . the Commission could put stipulations to the site plan 40. Chairman closed the public hearing 41. Mr. Taylor asked if they could make stipulations / 42. Mr McNulty replied they could and that they could also / add a reverter. '-'''4 - rr.i-4-= 43 Mr. Vehon asked why a reverter and if there were stipulations if they go with the zoning with any owner He t-�; -r .-., said he felt this would be a good buffer and was not in favor of a reverter 44 Mr Nakagawa stated that the building and development plans were subject to the Building Official and City Engineer's approval I 45. Chairman after a brief discussion on stipulations, called for a motion. 46. Taylor/Sansoni M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-10-84, also , - • known as Proposed Ordinance No 263, application of Donna and Robert Loewenstein for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting tr~sy _ Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1984 -- F rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone and Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. "Any stipulations or recommendations are 1 The applicant dedicate the west fifty feet. (50') and the south fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and a sixty foot (60') right-of-way for the West Fourth Avenue alignment • 2. In the TH section of the rezoning, the • applicant will construct and enclose the area with a six foot (6' ) masonry wall 3. The maximum units to be placed on the TH zoning will be 72 units. • "The reasons for this recommendation are • 1. The basic rezoning is compatible with the General Plan. 2 It will act as a buffer with Ironwood and the residential area to the east " 47 Mrs Conway made an amendment to the motion to add a one-year M reverter clause which died for lack of a second The main motion passed unanimously (6-0-0) amoo (- 48. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-11-84, rezoning from GR to TH in Section 18, and asked for staff briefing 49 Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 50. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 51 Guy Ridenhour stated he wanted to have a place for his mother 1975 W Shiprock in-law to live • 52. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in • opposition, asked for staff comments 53. Mr Nakagawa said that this rezoning would be consistent with the medium/high density opportunity General Plan designation for the site He recommended stipulating dedication of right-of-way 54 Chairman asked how many units could be placed on this site 55. Mr Nakagawa replied that there could be three maximum now if it is lot split. I_ 56. Mr Ridenhour stated he did not anticipate putting in any- more trailers, but that a neighbor had been rezoned and he had put in four trailers on 11 acre site, so if he wanted to do it too, he would 57 Mr. Nakagawa commented that the neighbor would have to answer to the Zoning Administrator as to why he's running a mobile home park. He stated that one owner can split into three parcels, and then the next owner can split, but that one owner cannot split the property into four parcels. /ak .r PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 263, PZ-10-84, LOEWENSTEIN (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mr. McNulty briefed the Council on the petition for rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone. /'\ )' Mr. Marty Jones, representing the • applicants, requested approval of the application Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. Mr. Guy Ridenhour addressed the Council, asking whether 4th Avenue would qo through Mr. McNulty explained that the re- • zoning would not affect the destination of 4th Avenue, and it will go through as of the present. Mr. McNulty stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval and the Development Coordinating Committee has no objection with a stipulation for dedication of • rights-of-way. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 263, by title only for the first reading. • City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ( ORDINANCE NO. 263, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ( ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); AND FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVIISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Amok PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 264, PZ-11-84, RIDENHOUR (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to • the public. Mr. McNulty explained that this is a i request for rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), i „ which is located on the south side of Shiprock Street, 165 feet east of Main Drive in Section 18. Mr Guy Ridenhour, 1975 W. Shiprock, Apache Junction, explained that the purpose of rezoning request is to move a trailer onto the property Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the City Manager for recommendations. Mr McNulty stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Development Coordinating Committee both re- commend approval. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 264, by title only for the first reading. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MAY 1, 1984 PAGE 5 C" YP1/4-CH FJG •'�= Dit oac1ieunction IZONPP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 7, 1984 MEMORANDUM T THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ' ,' 'p1ICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER / " FROM: 7fueCHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO PACKET INFORMATION - SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - PZ-38-84 (HUDSON) During the public hearing held on this case on September 4th, there was discussion on means by which the subject property could be rezoned to CB-2 and yet restrict the more objectionable uses from being permitted. Below, I have outlined some alternatives for your consideration: 1. Rezone to CB-2 with conditions limiting the specific uses to be permitted or specific uses to be prohibited as authorized in Section 2809 of the City Zoning Ordinance. 2. Rezone to CB-1 and if there is a use for which the applicant desires to use the property not specifically enumerated in the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council may permit such a use under authority of Section 1501(b) of the Zoning Ordinance if in the opinion of the City Council the use "is not more obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the community than the enterprises or businesses above enumerated" (those uses as enumerated as CB-1 uses). I also investigated the feasibility of applying our Planned Development Ordinance to this case. It seems that Planned Development would not be effective since the placement of structures, density, design, and so forth do not seem to be issues and the applicant has not indicated specific uses to which he would be willing to dedicate the facility. CRN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 oviN 1,O� ► .��,��C1 ��I �,�, amity oprche �unctian zo DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 15, 1984 Approver for Agenda eir) D•t= Itp 0 First Reading �. MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading LIU r 11Public Hearing THROUGH. � 7MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER VOId r;usiness s FROM: oLeCHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New e Ae n Consentt Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-38-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 300) SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-38-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 300, is a request by the applicants Roy and Norma Hudson to rezone their property from CR-3 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 1.5 acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Ironwood Drive and Broadway Avenue in Section 30. It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include houses , duplexes , a school , water tank, and vacant land. Planning Department Comments The proposed CB-2 zone would not be consistent with the General Plan and, therefore, cannot be recommended on the basis of conformity with the Plan. However, it should be noted that the General Plan and the existing zoning on the corners of the intersection north of Broadway are General Business. The more restrictive CB-1 zone would be consistent. No dedications would be required in this case as the right-of-way has already been acquired. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 14, 1984, after public hearing , voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Vehon 7-0-0) 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 35220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-38-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 300) August 15, 1984 Page Two "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-38-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 300, application of Roy and Norma Hudson for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-3 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application. The reasons for this recommendation are: That CB-2 under Local Commercial designated as such on the General Plan as this area is, this would not be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction. The more restrictive CB-1 would be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction and might be considered by the City Council of the City of Apache Junction as this case is forwarded to them." CRN:mas AIN 'K:a: ••a•i+4. it ti: ` — _,`.._- _ �►' y- -.: z PZ-38-84 =-` _ : —•: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 300 �> Y PROPOSED FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE -� -- --.--- TO CB-2REZONE GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE : �� ��3 ue � � --.� .:. ten 4 N~.ter •? .r:. .yam ',..en. Ex1:5 ?),. /vbezai- 4 1 II 1 �.. T 1 i 1 t 1 ^� �! - CB-2 5 i? ',, I 1CB-2 I _—!'--- 0 CR-3 I I �� 14 I I k) CB-2 11 a � `� ti I---� . Ate* r t{ 1 LJ1L r.+. ti .`` �.t 01 sft,,,, 1 n "k}'t..r ,Ali 4i. •Pratµ' i _Ay til t-...� �.; _ . ' -*. �„�- .t tt t `P I II t Q Q CR 4 I 1 L r1 1, 1 ..........„...__„..„...„..,...,..,..:. , %.:,. .._ ,..,, : I CR- , 3, 0 1 �> - 11VV-�)4 $ . I 1_—_ __— __-1i 1 — --- - I- -- - - -- - ------ 1 SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 200' i-I I__; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) oli k S_ T'T 1GY.f�er'�1C.y+V"`=_,.... rwr"ti�.� '.. ePrnr ORDINANCE NO. 300 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-38-84 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT es SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as Tract A, Mara Heights, according to Book 10 of Maps, Page 3, records of Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the east 115 feet of of the south 92 9 feet thereof, in Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-3 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David Alexander City Attorney ... ems► PZ-38-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 300 PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE 1 II 1{li i I ' ii II i CB-2eI TH 0 I I II 11 CB-2 I i� ___— CR-3 I I I I I I i II t CB-2 ii--II I 1 I I II V I � ----II - -----! --I WEST BROADWAY AVENUE qi / II 9TH AVE A w I II •w �� > II ''�� CR111111-'1 A Ai _ Q i CB-1/PD I j TH/PD =-- I r- - -—=—f 3 I I II CR 4 I1 I. CR-3 I o I I lOTH Av I I II l I I S I I s e rA SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 200' _J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET I' NOTES „v, ) (/ ITEP1 # I I MEETING OF q /- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: ..)(1441101( YES NO ABSTAINED Ge '#C I- M STEELS COUNCILMAN SHANKS V COUNCILMAN HILL I COUNC I L�^AN TAYLOR CO UNC I LMAN DAM IANO VICE flAYOR EIDSON UNAN P.OUS I N FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET ; NOTES / ( ))/( 11-)IVIA-J ITEM # ' MEETING OF POTION BY: SECONDED BY: I ICU vim' YES NO ABSTAINED J VICE MAYOR FTDSON TI4- COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HT11 I COUNCILMAN SHANKS ii .COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V _ 1 UNAN 1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL /\ ,ram ITEM NO . 11 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 300, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous motion to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 300 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING. Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 300 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF r^ APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-38-84 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL .r ITEM NO . 11 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 300, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 300 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . S ^ 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 300 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-38-84 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL i4( rSACHt. do - ' O U . ,�rl ji ` Z 1 :_`-figs .tit... "c1RizoW" VDity et ( -i-rache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: 7J4MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER t FROM: ';AN CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 APPOINTMENT TO SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE AND/OR ANNEXATION COMMITTEE The Subdivision and Annexation Committees both have a vacancy due to resignations. A News Release was sent to the newspapers on August 6, 1984 and again on August 28, 1984 requesting Talent Bank applications for these committees. One application was received from the first release. We are are hopeful that enough are received from the second release to appoint new committee members. At this time, we are requesting that, if possible, new members be appointed to both of these committees. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that be appointed to fill the vacancy on the (Subdivision) (Annexation) Committee. CRN:mas Approver for Agenda % Dpte item # First Reading 7/Mg 2_ Second Reading ___- Public Hearing Old Business - New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 oiN ,~ PeACHF O _4,;T ,`YX /0 ►►, .>i, O _ i¢_-- sqR1z'a • vf U &- paceZL n,;`2an TALENT BANK APPLI CATI ON eS /' FOR/ �• 11,27-Ali s BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE j i DATE' w� / -/ai/ NAME: l TELEPHONE: C (home) ;� ,j� (office ZIP CODE: c.�' ADDRESS. j� - ���/ -�G%U ) OCCUPATION: . L ,t''4'fag/ L� L�� -i �o .Z� J J (if retired, please indica't ' mer occupati n o profe ion) / i r G EDUCATION:i '� i Q,71 .� -�. I - ' Y // PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES :24-.' 7' , ALAND„,,,L, ...i..2 - -, ^, ADDIT.IONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REF .ENCES: ... ' G ,y,')- h 'L4 n / r /POYA v-27 / Pc 2Z:z. - NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/81 i nzture "licant z RECORD COPY r 5 !f 1C01 NCRTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE J'JNCTICN,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Ar) ITEM # • MEETING OF q MOTION BY: L2SECONDED BY: / YES NO ABSTAINED COHNCII MANI 1MIANO . CfUNCIL°1AN HILL V COHNC ILN'AN TAYLOR .LOUNC ILMAN SHANKS JIICF MAYOR EIDSON I cc r UNANI..OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT BE APPOINTED TO THE ANNEXATION COMMITTEE AND THAT BE APPOINTED TO THE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE . o fin. • u 1 ?984 Oi • N(IRIZO ' DCity o �4pache unctaon DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 30, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: JIM BAKKEDAHL, CITY ENGINEER FROM: =iiCHUCK NEWCOMER, CHAIRMAN, DEVELOPMENT � COORDINATING COMMITTEE SUBJECT: AB-83-7, AB-83-14 The Development Coordinating Committee discussed the above- referenced abandonment cases at their August 30, 1984 meeting. Recommendations to the City Council from the Committee are as follows: AB-83-7 No objection to abandonment of Manzanita Street, Mockingbird Street, or Greasewood Street. The Committee did feel that the reservation for Roundup Street should be retained due to Roundup' s classification as a collector street, and it may be needed to service future development in the area. It was noted that the wash crossing the Roundup alignment in this area was not severe enough to hamper future road construction. AB-83-14 No objection to the proposed abandonment. It was noted that all parcels would have access and no objection by the affected property owners has been received. CRN:ma s Approver for Agenda Date,�./ Item # First Reading 9//yA j - /4 Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 Ilk Alm\ PF aCn,3-'>, < L ( ../ '', -.- ''‘ 0E--- - 1'. if.;:,,,_ k ) Approver toy Agenda -'v g. ?t I Ut U'` y? Cn r?L' =; ZGL L�J:d Date Item # First Reading 776/7(4{ Ile Second Reading August 28, 1984 Public Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: <�l�'' /CITY MANAGER 1 1 i ' DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS k_tA, FROM: CITY ENGINEER cl,.`3. SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM '— September 4, 1984 (AB-83-7 RESOLUTION NO. 83-18) GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANTS: SUNNY H. BARBER, HAROLD & NANCY KOERNER, REUBEN & GENEVIEVE HAAS, EARL & JEAN LAABS, DEAN & HAZEL JONES, SIERRA ENTERPRISES INC., ARTHUR & JACQUELINE POLEGA, CARL & MARIANNE ARMSBY, M.R. & ALICE YEAGER. PARCELS: 100-27-190, 100-27-19B, 100-27-020, 100-27-027, ........ 100-27-028, 100-27-35F, 100-27-35A STREETS REQUESTED: MANZANITA STREET, MOCKINGBIRD STREET, AND GREASE— WOOD STREET from North Hilton Road to North Gold— field Road. STREET CONDITION: Not opened or maintained by the City. All property owners have access from another street. D.C.C. COMMENTS: The committee will be reviewing this abandonment at its August 30, 1984 meeting. The committee's recommendation will be presented verbaly at the council meeting. ABP:jw 001 NORTH !DAHO • APACHE Ili'C ION ARIZONA 65220'^1'�0 4 ;EI EPHCNE(602)982 8002 RESOLUTION NO 83-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON MANZANITA STREET, AND GREASEWOOD STREET FROM NORTH HILTON ROAD TO NORTH GOLDFIELD ROAD, AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABAND- ONMENT CASE AB 83-7, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY �It WHEREAS, the requested abandonments are easements for public rights-of-way purposes described as these parcels of land located in Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East. Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Final County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows: Parcel No. 1 The North thirty-three (33') feet of the South z of the South- east =1 of the Northeast =, of the Southeast a, EXCEPT the East fifty (50') feet, the West thirty-three (33') feet and the South thirty-three (33') feet thereof. i• Parcel No 2 The South thirty-three (33') feet of the South i of the West of the North i of the Southeast } of the Northeast a of the Southeast „ EXCEPT the West thirty-three (33') feet thereof Parcel No. 3- The North thirty-three (33') feet of the North one-hundred ten feet (110') feet of the East ? of the North a of the Southeast } of the Southeast 1 of the Southeast 1. EXCEPT the East fifty (50') feet thereof. i Parcel No. 4: The South thirty-three (3'') feet of the North z of the Northeast '-, of the Southeast 1 of the Southeast 1, EXCEPT the West thirty- three (33') feet, the North thirty-three (33') feet and the East fifty (50') feet thereof. Parcel No 5• The South thirty-three (33') feet of the Northeast 1 of the South- east a of the Northeast $ of the Southeat a, EXCEPT the East fifty (50') feet thereof Parcel No 6 The North thirty-three (33') feet and the South thirty-three (33') feet of the South i of the Northeast 1 of the Southeast a of the Southeast ;, EXCEPT the West thirty-three (33') feet and the East fifty (50') feet thereof Parcel No 7 The North thirty-three (33') feet of the West i of the North 1 of f the Southeast ; of the Southeast a of the Southeast -1, EXCEPT the West thirty-three (33') feet thereof WHEREAS, th.. abandonments requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, or have access by a feder- ally patented easement which may in the Future be developed: and ^ r--s RESOLUTION NO 83-18 PAGE TWO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction. Arizona. finds that these said federally patented easements for public rights-of-way purposes as described herein are classified as local streets on the Apacne Junction Street Classification Plan and are no longer necessary for public use as roadways, and WHEREAS, these said easements requested for abandonment have never been improved as public roadways and maintained by a local governing agency NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above-described federally patented easements reserved for public rights-of-way purposes are hereby abandoned and extinguished as present or future public rights-of-way. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the abandonment of the public right- of-way has no effect on reservations for public utility easements PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST. } Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• avi r, exan er City ttorney 1 1 - . 1002 .2.1,) . F., , - ri TEEFEE SFE rv1A- 100 24 STkEET r 111�� c (� „ r r, r I ) n 0 C I , 7 ' cr_! Ui_ .f • .-i .) `' --Ir 1,--s0 - - M/NZ/NIT/, FT, r ;.2) OM CEt) , ' ; ) t 11 t I z - — — I;c,t,NI UI' 5T 1- - — - - - - -.ao I :) .r „, .4, ... . _, 27 - t•' . , , r- . I , - _ -+II So 3-I ,7XLL ,2 gal r 1 I -.—so' ....r., GFEAStve,c,L' J r tr �l (g31 3q (3; (1) +r �/ ;S Jr h_J / ` ' SIESTA. qT I SCALE 1"-30 i 33 r `37) (',f' '?\ �� \5/ `:I ( not, I --1 ---7 - '--1'''J ;l V{ - } _ nn ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r� �l f k ITEM # I ,� MEETING OF MOTION BY: s1/0.7 SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILf AN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUMC I LI^AN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON UUAMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL V C- ITEM NO . 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT RESOLUTION NO. 83-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON MANZANITA STREET , AND GREASEWOOD STREET FROM NORTH HILTON ROAD TO NORTH GOLDFIELD ROAD , AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-83-7, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. � Gy ".� acIieunciion"1Rizo�P �Lly °t DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 30, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: JIM BAKKEDAHL, CITY ENGINEER FROM. CHUCK NEWCOMER, CHAIRMAN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE SUBJECT: AB-83-7, AB-83-14 The Development Coordinating Committee discussed the above- referenced abandonment cases at their August 30, 1984 meeting. Recommendations to the City Council from the Committee are as follows. AB-83-7 No objection to abandonment of Manzanita Street, Mockingbird Street, or Greasewood Street. The Committee did feel that the reservation for Roundup Street should be retained due to Roundup' s classification as a collector street, and it may be needed to service future development in the area. It was noted that the wash crossing the Roundup alignment in this area was not severe enough to hamper future road construction. AB-83-14 No objection to the proposed abandonment. It was noted that all parcels would have access and no objection by the affected property owners has been received. CRN'ma s Approver for Agenda Date Item # First Reading _/ 7.374/L Second Reading Public Hearing ✓Oid Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 gp,CH 2 ( ,/,\ ( i (2 Lfii,,v, 'tt . .'' l' •OA()) 1 ,. ,mot.., \\ I4y .c1 4)/ ��. ( it v of 1�fia,CJ -- u Oct zoo Z i -..-- August 28, 1984 .+G MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ' CITY MANAGER n DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS } I,'7 FROM: CITY ENGINEER 1.0- SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM — September 4, 1984 (AB-83-7 RESOLUTION NO. 84-50) GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANTS: M.R. & ALICE YEAGER, REUBEN & GENEVIEVE HAAS PARCELS: 100-27-020, 100-27-027 STREETS REQUESTED: Roundup Street from North Hilton Road to North Goldfield Road. L. STREET CONDITION: Not opened or maintained by the City. All property owners have access from another street. D.C.C. COMMENTS: The committee will be reviewing this abandonment at its August 30, 1984 meeting. The committee's recommendation will be presented verbally at the council meeting. Approver for Agenda 4-C�' / t� Helm)* First Reading /`� Second Reading _ Public Hearing Old Business ABP:jw New Business Consent Agenda '001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 RESOLUTION NO. 84-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON ROUNDUP STREET FROM NORTH HILTON ROAD TO NORTH GOLDFIELD ROAD, AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-83-7, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HERE- BY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. PIN } WHEREAS, the requested abandonments are easements for public Irights-of-way purposes described as these parcels of land located in Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows- Parcel No 1• The South thirty-three (33') feet of the South i of the Southeast 'e of the Northeast a of the Southeast a. EXCEPT the West thirty-three (33') feet and the East fifty (50') feet thereof. Parcel No 2• ° The North thirty-three (33') feet of the North 1 of the Northeast } of the Southeast a of the Southeast 1. EXCEPT the West thirty-three (33') feet and the East fifty (50') feet thereof. WHEREAS, the abandonments requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, or have access by a feder- } ally patented easement which may in the future be developed; and tWHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. finds that these said federally patented easements for public rights-of-way purposes as described herein are classified as local streets on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan and are no longer necessary for public use as roadways, and WHEREAS, these said easements requested for abandonment have never been improved as public roadways and maintained by a local governing agency. ^ NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above-described federally patented easements reserved for public rights-of-way purposes are hereby abandoned and extinguished as present or future public rights-of-way. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the abandonment of the public right- of-way has no effect on reservations for public utility easements PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 i . Wendell J Clarke ATTEST Kathleen Connelly CityClerk ek APPROVED AS TO FORM avi exander X City Attorney HAAS ABANDoNMENT �0 � ,7 - -AB- 83-.7 - - - ��// f� TEEPEE SEE MAP 100-24 STkEET 1 rE ERA L �� • D PATENTED EASEMENT TO _SE ASArIDoNED J- ; 0 I OAS'ESSo R'5 PARCEL NO. C , I c. - - - - - SEIIPRo..K ST. - I I�� 17 (IJ t a . — — —MANZ/.NITA ST. - '- - - — - - D l`�) • a 1 r'l I _ `201 • 1 m' ,e e) 1. ,,., 1 4: 1 r. - - 1u,UNI ur' ST ' ' --{�h_So N J • ; ..„ � 27 p � — — -Mt>CKINGflI R D - - ST. - - - - - - - -4 So' t30 L � , , 261 filliS .I �-50' Fii GFEA5Ebvvvv _. _ . I 33 , f�, 4- (0). 6 I (ID [, 1 '-•/ • r , SIESTA • ST SCALE 1"-30, o C' �7J (Es g S E CT L o N 15 1 .,� . TJOV .+LV[, -i .. - r, 1 ^S n x1 ' c'-.1 a .'- 1 o ON 1 i ►J c+ I '1 PI 1 E e+ I cG 1 e+ op I 1 �- ---- --- - - 1 - — — — - - - - -_..ice 1 I -,�. w 1 '* 'k1 Easement in point j I1 1 z i —i 1 I -� --- , 0 r-- -' -- �" — -- -'--- ------"a- =. 0 L-1--- i • i i - .e ,M • i iv a 1-, ' - I.-. - i 1 i c IN I CO A . ,. , . , . o i t�A 1 I - . ► ; v/- I> z ' t7 I o ;o 1- d O ] i - 'd a, I Xs i •I ' l (A- - IA 1 vl y — - ---— -- -- 1 I I-' `% --=�- - —J --- iI 1 I c+ • 1--—1 r -v cC ,1-.1-.ram i Easementin point w _ i t _ �- -_-_ l i r-- 'd 7C I I I I 1 I I 1 O I I I r O A 1 , 1 ' CDD Z I 1 I c+ II I I t< In regards to our application for abandonment of the Public Roadway Easements along our North and South lot lines only, We hereby wish to express our reasons for this request as follows 1 The zoning of our Parcels of land in this area in point restricts that "No lot shall be less than 1* acre in size" , Therefore this restricts the possible division of our (5) acre parcel not to exceed four (4) equal sized lots of l} acre each. Resulting that in any case as you may note by the above detailed plot plan each divided lot will achieve availability of ingress and egress to a dedicated street, and therefore the existing north and south roadway easements of our five acre parcel of land are of no future benefit to us nor any other surrounding parcels' of land, and also a loss of use of valueable _ Reaidential property. Your favorable consideration of this Abandonment request will be appreciated. Reuben C. Haas , 1126 No. Goldfield Rd. , Apache Jct. , Ariz . 85220. ........ 10 0 II 2 - =r - EEFEE SEE rv1AP 100 -24 STREET =c. �E r t - c. , _ • - t0 f -D . I ) 0 E _ . `J • — -- — — — s S k 11u F ^ :- T. - - 0 0 i ,iE a\ ,.: y I14-5o. - -- -- MANZ/.NITI; ST. - .. i 6) •.• �_-I W -, ` ¢ r-7 - - It(-UN( UP ST. ; , —'i. ;'s_ a,.: ,— e ¢ ,27 ...... -J - - - -t,"-;-.)CK Tr,GeI R D - - - s-r, _ - a -. I 5 0' W :3} 12 w 2r' ,B n ' I• k 4-S C f GEASLV/r-illE' b I. 'LI", immaigut I it- - '"_-7 ' r SIESTA ST. SCALE 1"- 3 3 6)_ 37) �rN r3f"� �`�) S EC_T?-oti, 15 .,i:� h. ,T IU`V 9t V[. T. R. A. HENSEL ATTORNEY P. 0 BOX 308 TELEPHONE(509)745 8493 WATERVILLE,WASHINGTON 98858 September 11, 1984 Mayor Clark City Hall Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 RE: Abandonment/Roundup Street Dear Mayor Clark: I represent Opal and Alice Yeager, who are property owners in your city. They are interested in seeing that Roundup Street, between their property and the Haas property, is not opened. The Yeagers have a five acre parcel and if any more of the property is taken they will not be able to divide it into four 1-1/4 acre tracts. They also feel there will be no access problems for any of their parcels, nor to any of the other parcels by not opening up Roundup Street. Both of the Yeager ladies wish that the abandonment petition be favorably received and that their property not be fettered by this road. They feel that by not abandoning this proposed roadway their property will be —. downgraded and will not retain its present value. They have already given the easements for Goldfield and Hilton and their property is going to be chopped up into small pieces if this road goes through. Neither of the ladies will able to be present at the hearing, but would like their thoughts known, and respectfully request that serious consideration be given to granting the abandonment. Thank you in advance. Very truly yours, R . HENSEL Attorney for Alice and Opal Yeager, Mansfield, Washington RAH:pb ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Q' l16° ,tip D • ITEM # vl MEETING OF 1/j6Ty\, MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: YES NO/ ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTDSON COUNCILMAN!!TAYLOR _H COUNCILMAN T� I_ V COUNCILMAN SHANKS OUNCILMAN DAMIANO UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL mik p ITEM NO. 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 84-50, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON ROUNDUP STREET FROM NORTH HILTON ROAD TO NORTH GOLDFIELD ROAD , AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-83-7, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. • PQACHE✓G 1 O e' z . - gR�ZoN�, (ity o pac�ie unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: c), ,/MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: 0';.% CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 TIME EXTENSION FOR PZ-7-79 (ORDINANCE NO. 55) Project Description This is a one-year time extension request for a Planned Development which was originally approved on September 3, 1980. This project is a 100-unit apartment complex on a 4.75 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Scenic Street and Royal Palm Road. Planning Department Comments Section 33.11(4) of the Zoning Ordinance provides that the City Council may grant a one-year extension to planned developments if the applicant shows good cause for the extension and if it serves the public interest. The applicant' s letter is attached. The Planning and Zoning Commission has granted previous extensions to this project which is now scheduled to expire on October 4, 1984. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the requested extension of one (1) year ending October 4, 1985, be and hereby is (approved) (denied) to submit required application materials for final approval of the first stage of planned development as set forth in rezoning case PZ-7-79 (Ordinance No. 55) . Approver for Agenda /C-- � tee_ CRN:ma s First Reading /X �/ JO) Second Reading - Public Hearing - Old Business ✓ New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 JEFFREY M. PROPER .�•. Attorney at Law ;+ b VI 3, •-:,,; -,* 3507 North Central Avenue ; Mom;; Suite 406 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 602/234-3000 -NO , .;1 July 25, 1984 The City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Apache Junction, Arizona 85220-0190 Attention: Chuck Newcomer Re: PZ-7-79 (Ordinance No. : 55) Dear Mr. Newcomer: In accordance with my previous conversation with you, I represent Dr. Michael S. K. Mak and Oscar Shiell with respect to the above-numbered zoning matter. Our records indicate that on August 24 , 1983 , your depart- ment approved a one year extension to and including October 9 , 1984, for the commencement of the project which was the subject of the above rezoning. Our client has informed us that several matters, including, but not limited to the fluctuating interim interest market and exceptionally high permanent interest rates for the project which was contemplated by the CR-5/PD zoning make the commencement of this project economically unfeasible at this time. We would, therefore, request that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona grant an additional one year extension to the preliminary ap- proval of the CR-5/PD zoning to and including October 9 , 1985. It is hoped that during this interim period the interest market will allow the commencement of this project. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours , 9411-4-4-7, Jeffrey M. Proper JMP/j cc: Mr. Oscar Shiell Dr. Michael S . K. Mak . _ _ ._ _ _ ________ . ------------- _____, ). 3 , , ,.,,• , ., ...,.....,, • ,,.... ._. ..,...,..,• 1 ,. .. ., , 4 i`J ++ ley ;` .��� t1;1{ f, t ter __ `� .7 ,`+� ,.. {. ' ► w' - ,, �..r �: , atr` y , ^'`, ; . . Vim Par!'4404e 'N,f4"' .V4. ''• 'in• .,.. `Y.i }.3s. *r. t r• '11..41,', .•a. .it _ 4 � r ... ,/qIi ,,IS�rJJyy'r��' ,ItW}}}1 `'u,t 4jif���'. 'b .4 ,ate , . ti^ r.� k9' 7 -'^ r p .5 ' � ,LItliti kkk,- - , i. . k-, .'t ,-.... t...tki: 'Ai ..14'''* . ii '''' did -7-' .• ' ' "iii ' 1,, ,',.• 7 ryt.^4k ' if r ''; ft t�?:! •. 4 �,f � ��t'. .�' ( {r�. � ..,r y , .‘11117:: i,l,III (ilig5 ''"�� 4 --4r' ,� ../- . . • . Ij C �+x w11> e k rt,.. ...„-, ,, .,, ,,„,,, _ . .,. . C .GSPIA; '1 C ,.l I. Yr ' • Yl. PZ- 7- t9 SCESUSTER ( PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 55) REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR TO CR-5/PD GR GR GR CR-5 M CR-5 ik SCENIC STREET 4 al ` ` 66' 3D' bC Q TN 2 ct GfZp GR I- a r TN } cC CR-5 N I I I 0 300' 400' 1"=300' 7S/U 4<{(7(nle,24 / l/ /'-i2.",`. >` ?e-.2/�' 0,1(m_ hri 6- h/ / 4%'2_4,7 tom/ /727 en,zit_. $-mac s0 'j 3 Yo ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (J� L ' )1)1 A.\ 4 ;>/ ITEM #E 1 MEETING OF f� � MOTION BY : c7 .1j2.7 SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS 1111111111111 COUNCILMAT! DAMIANO 4 ,A • r MICE MAYOR EIDSON 11111111111111 COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN ILL 11111111111111 UNAN 'IOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Adonak ITEM NO . 15 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE REQUESTED EXTENSION OF ONE ( 1 ) YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 4 , 1985 , BE AND HEREBY IS (APPROVED ) (DENIED ) TO SUBMIT REQUIRED APPLICATION MATERIALS FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE FIRST STAGE OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS SET FORTH IN REZONING CASE PZ-7-79 , ORDINANCE NO . 55 . PQACNE✓G O , ti '41PIZOI4P `0ity 4 A pache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 10, 1984 ... MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 7 THROUGH: ` 0,MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: C(. CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 TIME EXTENSION FOR PZ-12-79 (ORDINANCE NO. 56) Project Description This is a request for a one-year time extension for a Planned Development which was originally approved on September 3, 1980. This project is a 12-unit apartment complex on a 32,600 square foot parcel located on the east side of Grand Drive, 250 feet south of Apache Trail . Planning Department Comments Section 33.11(4) of the Zoning Ordinance provides that the City Council may grant a one-year extension to planned developments if the applicant shows good cause for the extension and if it serves the public interest. ... The Planning and Zoning Commission, under the old Ordinance, has granted previous extensions to this project which is now scheduled to expire on October 4, 1984. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that a one-year extension ending October 4, 1985, be and hereby is (approved) (denied) to allow submittal of required materials for final approval of this planned development as set forth in rezoning case PZ-12-79, Ordinance No. 56. !!� Approver for Agenda Ye_.. D to/, Item # CRN:mas First Reading ?A'/ / l� (J►�%¢f V r��` Second Reading _ Public Hearing Old Business A NeW Business Consent Agenda 1301 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 Jim Nakagawa City of Apache Junction Re :Apache Village Apartments �•. Site Plan Approval Dear Jim, Per our telephone conversation of September 10 , 1984 , I am requesting an extension 13.1 our Site Plan Approval for the Apache Village Apartments, Grand Avenue , Apache Junction . The new Owner of the project , Mr . Don Morris, is making an earnest attempt to secure a building permit for the project and hopes to be under construction soon . Please let us know if there is any problem or' if we may be of further help . Yo tru l , GiZt,01A y on rig Brower A. I .A. RECEIVED SEP 1i 1984 or PLAtsa 11-4 Ink Ink PZ- I2- 79 LAWTHER ( PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 56 ) REQUESTED REZONING FRom GR To CR-5/PD U S. HIGHWAY 60,$'O,89 CB-2 CB-2 tss' SUB Ec.T SITE r =FIRST AVE GR o' 015' CR 3 � a Assik z GR0 cc c ¢ V CC F- Z 0 O N 0 120' 240� /"_ /20' rPr� �a/ /,e �a/7/7/ 7/' 9` 2cn-�i//7 �IYY,'i�'!iS c/6 77 (7/S/ ��f'_CrlrrLi _ , '&4) C a/ 62 r 7/ 1 .•. - ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 't/ID (19 1).4.,1 )(?' /Y\k), ci t/ / ITEM # I � MEETING / �OF cliy-vvy MOTION BY: SECONDED BY Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL V COUNCILMAN SHANKS J/ VICE MAYOR COUNCILMAN DAMI ANO I • CfQ MA UNAI'IMOUS � IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL /"► ITEM NO. 16 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION ENDING OCTOBER 4, 1985 , BE AND HEREBY IS (APPROVED ) (DENIED ) TO ALLOW SUBMITTAL OF REQUIRED MATERIALS FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS SET FORTH IN REZONING CASE PZ-12-79 , ORDINANCE NO . 56. '1N�atAe4 us iota�\ APACHE JUNCTION REACH OUTS INC. PO BOX 1419 APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 on silo- September 7, 1984 Apache Junction, AZ City Council City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Council Members, The Apache Junction Reach Out Food Bank earnestly needs your help. we ended the third quarter of this year with a perilously low amount of funds and food. To be quite frank, we presently have less than 100.00 in our bank account. The growing number of needy families in our community has almost stretched our resources,beyond our capabilities. In 1983, we furnished 2,678 adults and children with emergency food to see them through a three day period. Through August of this year, we have already served 2,971 people--- and we still have four more months to go. We are a non-profit organization using only volunteer workers and are supported by donations from churches, mobile home/RV parks, organizations and individuals within the community. Unfortunately, the combination of a growing need (over 900 persons in July and August alone ) and a severe drop in support during the spring and summer months has created a problem for us. While we shop for only the best bargains in the local stores and strive to serve only the truly needy, we have reached the point where we may have to cur- tail service until we find some relief. Knowing that you are concerned about the quality of life for all residents of our community, we would appreciate any assistance you may be able to give in support of the Food Bank. If you would like more information, I would be pleased to talk with you about our operation. You may call me at 983-0637. Thanking you in advance for your kind consideration, I am, Sincerely, c,.L-Ti�1� M rritt M. elm, Jr( , Chairman Apache Junction Reach Out, Inc. Box 1419 Apache Junction, AZ 85220 ��lC CA.AUT I011.1.1) APACHE JUNCTION REACH OUTS INC. P.O BOX 1419 ' APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 .6ppD SNP September 7, 1984 Apache Junction, AZ City Council City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Council Members, In 1983, the Apache Junction Reach Out Food 3ank furnished 2,678 Adults and children with emergency food to see them through a three day period. Through August of this year, we have already served 2,971 people--- and still have four months to go in 1984. We are a non-profit organization using only volunteer workers and are supported by donations within the community. Knowing that you are concerned about the quality of life tor all the residents in our community, we are prompted to write this letter. The Apache Junction Reach Out Food Bank earnestly needs your help. We ended the third quarter of this year with perilously low amounts of funds and food. The growing number of needy families in our community has almost stretched our resources beyond their capabilities. We- and the needy in this community would appreciate any assistance you may be able to give. Please contact me at 982-1940. Thanking you in advance for your kind consideration, I am, Respectfully Yours,f / / 1 f/ Nelson T. Wing, Secy. Apache Junction Reach Out* Inc. Box 232 Apache Junction, AZ 85220 NW/s co fJ. 1k t1kdee is lc. cof • CITY CLERK TO ireey./ DATE :/74 Sd ZI--661-j) /6%5--- ROLL CALL OTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # 0 MEETING OF MOTION BY: OiDA SECONDED BY: j6)1‘.' YE NO ABSTAINED COHNCIl MANPAMIANO CfUNCIL"1AN HILL L _ COHNCILN'AN TAYLOR _COUNCILMAN SHANKS _lIC.0 MAYOR EIDSON zttficETER UNANdr^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL L A\ ITEM NO . 17 Option A BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND — CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE SUBMITTED BY APACHE JUNCTION REACH OUT , INC . , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED. Option B BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE SUBMITTED BY APACHE JUN TION REACH OUT , INC . , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF 5 O,O . PQACHE 2 sl # - O UI f , ili ,t I. "4 /ZONP ` its o . pacl2e unction ... September 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER %4 FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS i) 0j,`� REGARDING• STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDING ROGRAM - PHASE I (Agenda Item) Requests for bids for the improvements to listed Phase I projects was advertised and posted in accordance with City policy. As the bid opening is scheduled for 10.00 a.m. on September 13, 1984, we cannot provide advance information as to the number of contractors submitting bids or their cost proposals at this time. The bids will be tabulated and subsequently presented to the Council under separate .. cover. Approver for Agenda �� Dto Item # First Reading 2 ' /Q Second Reading =�-- RWB:s h ` Public Hearing — Old Business ... New Business Ref: 100.051 .. Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 General Contracting Equipment Rentals Paving & Seal Coating y s„ J W Francis,Chairman I11110 Duke R Francis President ARIZONA LICENSE B-04 23916 CIIIIIIEST 1946 EQUIPMENT CO., INC. P 0 BOX 14709 • 3910 W INDIAN SCHOOL RD PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85063 • 602 /269-8348 18 September 1984 HAND DELIVERED The City Council City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Apache Junction, AZ. 85220-0190 Gentlemen: On September 13, 1984 our company submitted proposals to you to construct the Phase I street improvements in various areas of Apache Junction. Because of the somewhat unconventional basis that the bids were requested (i.e. a unit price proposal with the Contractor submitting estimated quantities), there exists the potential for an unfair award of the contracts that would not be to the best interest to your city. Normally in the industry the city establishes the proper quantities for the comparison of the bids, and the unit prices bid times the quantities determines the low bidder. We have prepared the following information for your consider— ation. CASE I. In the event that the two low bids are considered using the same quantities, as shown below, C & F Equipment Co., Inc. is low bidder. a A. Using Rein Schultz & Dahl Quantities: Description Rein Schultz & Dahl C & F Equipment Savings Alt. No. 1A $ 469,456.55 4 462,556.70 $ 6,899.85 Alt. No. 1B 459,211.05 452,474.70 6,736.35 B. Using C & F Equipment Quantities: Alt. No. 1A 480,661.00 472,489.00 8,172.00 Alt. No. 1B 473,821.50 466,821.00 7,000.50 CASE II. In the event that projects are awarded individually to the lowest bid for each project, C & F Equipment would be low on projects 6 thru 10 and Rein Shultz and Dahl would be low on projects 11 & 12. This would also result in a savings to the city of $618.00 considering that the alternate A is used in each bid. City of Apache Junction 18 September 1984 Page 2 • We respectfully request that the city compare the bids based on the actual quantities of work that will be performed as shown in the bidding documents. These quantities are not difficult to be determined and would provide the only fair basis to award the contract. Based on any quantities, C & F Equip- ment is the low bidder.on projects 6 through 10. Based on comparing the same quantities, C & F Equipment is low bidder on projects Alternates 1A and 1B. We respectfully request that the City Council award either Case I or Case II as outlined above to C & F Equipment Co. , Inc. Such an award would be com- pletely within the scope of your specifications, it would .be in accordance with Standard Bid Practices within the industry, and would result in the lowest cost to the City of Apache Junction. We will appreciate any consideration you may give this request. Very truly yours, C & F EQUIPMENT CO., INC. Dick McChan Vice President DM:1s amnk amok HURF BONDING BIDS (Excluding Tomahawk M.H. Park) 1 . Total cost for Project on Individual awards. PW 84-6 $62,145.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-7 62,750.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-8 (Alt. #1 ) 82,219.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-9 39,865.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-10 70,336.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-11 67,781 .00 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) PW 84-12 83,742.34 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) Total Cost $468,838.34 2. Total cost for Project on Overall award: Alternate "A" $469,456.55 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) Total Cost: $469,456.55 NOTE: Individual awards to contractors would save the City $618.21 , or approximately 0.13%. HURF BID COMPARISONS (Lowest Bids in order) * Corrected bid X Alternate Route PW 84-6: (1 ) $62,145.00 (C & F Equipment) (2) $63,295.20 (Nesbitt Contracting) (3) $63,610.95 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) PW 84-7: (1 ) $62,750.00 (C & F Equipment) (2) $63,994.00 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) *(3) $66,120.50 (Nesbitt Contracting) X PW 84-8: (1 ) $82,219.00 (C & F Equipment) (Alt. #1 ) (2) $83,817.50 (Nesbitt Contracting) (3) $95,418.44 (National Applicators, Inc. ) PW 84-8: (1 ) $76,424.00 (Nesbitt Contracting) (Alt. #2) (2) $76,650.00 (C & F Equipment) (3) $84,802.54 (National Applicators, Inc. ) PW 84-9. (1 ) $39,865.00 (C & F Equipment) (2) $43,200.00 (Nesbitt Contracting) (3) $45,851 .00 (Horizon) PW 84-10: (1 ) $70,336.00 (C & F Equipment) (2) $81 ,278.24 (National Applicators, Inc. ) (3) $89,166.60 (Nesbitt Contracting) PW 84-11 : (1 ) $67,781 .00 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) *(2) $68,939.00 (Nesbitt Contracting) (3) $69,579.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-12: (1 ) $83,742.34 (Rein , Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) (2) $85,595.00 (C & F Equipment) (3) $86,068.40 (Nesbitt Contracting) X - Overall Project (Alternate "A") : (1 ) $469,456.55 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) (2) $472,489.00 (C & F Equipment) (3) $476,160.70 (Nesbitt Contracting) Overall Project (Alternate "B") : (1 ) $459,211 .05 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) (2) $466,821 .00 (C & F Equipment) (3) $468,223.10 (Nesbitt Contracting) AM bk IOW HURF BONDING BIDS (Including Tomahawk M.H. Park) ... 1 . Total Cost for Project on Individual awards. PW 84-6 $62,145.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-7 62,750.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-8 (Alt #2) 76,424.00 (Nesbitt Contracting) PW 84-9 39,865.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-10 70,336.00 (C & F Equipment) PW 84-11 67,781 .00 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) PW 84-12 83,742.34 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) Total Cost. $463,043.34 2. Total cost for Project on Overall award: Alternate "B" $459,211 .05 (Rein, Schultz & Dahl/ABCO) Total Cost: $459,211 .05 NOTE: Overall award to contractor would save the City $3,832.29, or approximately 0.83%. SPECIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - PHASE I SEPTEMBER 13, 1984 Those Present: City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly Deputy City Clerk, Lori Clark Operations Supervisor, Doug Dobson City Engineer, Jim Bakkedahl Controller, Keith Lewis Director of Public Safety, Bill McDaniel Various representative for companies submitting bids A public notice was published September 1 through September 5, 1984, in the Mesa Tribune inviting bid proposals for Special Street Improvement Project, Phase I . The written bids were to be submitted by 10:00 a.m. , on September 13, 1984, in compliance with bid specifications. The bids were opened and read by City Clerk Kathleen Connelly as follows• COMPANY PW-84-6 PW-84-7 PW-84-8 PW-84-9 PW-84-10 PW-84-11 PW-84-12 Alternate A Alternate B Nesbitt Contracting Co. , Inc. P.O. Box 1269 1 )$83,817.50 Mesa, AZ 85201 $63,295.20 $66,152.50 2) 76,424.00 $43,200.00 $89,166.60 $68,969.00 $86,068.40 $476,160.70 $468,223.10 National Applicators, Inc. 4420 E. University 1 )$95,418.44 Phoenix, AZ 85034 $70,691 .44 $79,397.14 2) 84,802.54 $70,823.92 $81 ,278.24 $83,010.43 $88,563.00 $518,567.86 $508,244.37 Rein Schultz & Dahl/ABCO P.O. Box 1106 1 )$96,610.00 Mesa, AZ 85201 $63,610.95 $63,994.00 2) 85,500.00 $48,171 .75 $103,158.30 $67,781 .00 $83,742.34 $469,456.55 $459,211 .05 C & F Equipment Co. , Inc. 2910 W. Indian School Rd. 1 )$82,219.00 Phoenix, AZ 85063 $62,145.00 $62,750.00 2) 76,650.00 $39,865.00 $70,336.00 $69,579.00 $85,595.00 $472,489.00 $466,821 .00 Bentson Contracting Co. P.O. Box 8007 1 )$99,960.00 Phoenix, AZ 85066 $77,197.00 $79,825.00 2) 91 ,331 .50 $60,188.00 $102,732.50 $99,168.00 $119,915.00 $595,113.50 $487,540.40 Horizon Engineering & Construction P.O. Box 8490 1 )$117,315.06 Mesa, AZ 85204 $75,863.74 $70,403.48 2) 112,687.95 $45,851 .84 $89,477.68 $83,248.80 $94,410.41 $572,971 .06 $567,965.16 A.K.R. Contracting 7315 N. 67th Avenue $127,841 .95 Glen ale, AZ 8530 Kathleen Connelly City Clerk WITNESS CI 1/ L ri V. Clark Deputy City CLerk Jim Bakkedahl City Engineer ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES b9)6Ul ITEM # MEETING OF v r a NOTION BY; �JZY` SECONDED BY: i� YES NO ABSTAINED . COUNCI LrAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNC I LMAN TAYLOR J COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON V UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 18 Option A BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE BIDS FOR THE STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDING PROGRAM PHASE I BE AWARDED AS FOLLOWS : PW-84-6 TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $ PW-84-7 TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $ PW-84-8 TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $ PW-84-9 TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $ •-.. PW-84-10 TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $ PW-84-11 TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $ PW-84-12 TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $ Option B BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE BIDS FOR THE STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDING PROGRAM PHASE I FOR PW-84-6 THROUGH PW-84-12 BE AWARDED TO IN THE AMOUNT OF PQACHE.✓G Iv' �r 1)S:A: j z, AlR/ZONPil Z/ U �JGZGhe &''u3ZGlZUn September 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER yoa1YL Approver for Agenda Z�� FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS \. 02 g to It/m # First Reading �� REGARDING. STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - PHASE II Second Reading Public Hearing (Agenda Item) _ Old Business ✓ New Business Consent Agenda On June 19, 1984, the City Council authorized the process to negotiate proposals for street improvements for the 20-mile street bonding program. In this regard, the firms of O'Dell & Associates: Parker & Associates; Anderson-Nelson, Inc. , Municipal Designers & Consultants , Ltd. ; Wilson & Company; William J. Norman; Royden Engineering Company; and WLB Group, Inc. were contacted and offered an opportunity to submit proposals for Phase II projects of the program. PW 84-13 Lost Dutchman - Ironwood to Idaho 1 .00 mile PW 84-14 Shiprock - Meridian to Main .75 mile PW 84-15 Roundup - Ironwood to San Marcos .50 mile PW 84-16 Junction - Tomahawk to Goldfield 1 .00 mile PW 84-17 4th Avenue - Tomahawk to Goldfield 1 .00 mile PW 84-18 Southern - Raindance to Cortez ± 3/8 mile PW 84-19 Cortez - Southern to U.S. Hwy 60 ± 3/8 mile PW 84-20 Starr - Broadway to U.S. Hwy 60 ± 7/8 mile PW 84-21 Hilton - Superstition to Broadway 1 .00 mile PW 84-22 Tepee - Meridian to Delaware .50 mile Total 7.38 miles The proposals, as submitted and negotiated for a cumulative total of $47,200, are acceptable to the City Engineer and the Director of Public Works, and are recommended for approval . RWB: sh Ref. 100.051 001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES yfr 11) ITEf1 # r\ MEETING OF 4 1 A451-/ MOTION BY: SECONDED DY ; YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTDSON H .COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN H T I L _COUNCILMAN SHANKS _COUNCILMAN DAMIANO UNAN "..OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Air ITEM NO . 19 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO EXPEND $47 , 200 FOR CONSULTING SERVICES AND ENGINEERING WORK TO : 1 . ANDERSON-NELSON , INC . FOR PW-84-15 ROUNDUP - IRONWOOD TO SAN MARCOS AND PW-84-22 TEPEE - MERIDIAN TO DELAWARE 2. MUNICIPAL DESIGNERS & CONSULTANTS , LTD . FOR PW-84-16 JUNCTION - TOMAHAWK TO GOLDFIELD 3 . O 'DELL & ASSOCIATES FOR PW-84-13 LOST DUTCHMAN - IRONWOOD TO IDAHO 4. PARKER & ASSOCIATES FOR PW-84-14 SHIPROCK - MERIDIAN TO MAIN 5. ROYDEN ENGINEERING COMPANY FOR PW-84-20 STARR - BROADWAY TO U . S . HWY 60 6. WILLIAM J . NORMAN FOR PW-84-18 SOUTHERN - RAINDANCE TO CORTEZ AND PW-84-19 CORTEZ - SOUTHERN TO U . S . HWY 60 7. WILSON & COMPANY FOR PW-84-17 4TH AVENUE - TOMAHAWK TO GOLDFIELD 8. WLB GROUP , INC . FOR PW-84-21 HILTON - SUPERSTITION TO BROADWAY :sACHEdo O •LC;; U ;1 ;'_ J Z "1,91Z00' Ic 'ity obc cache unction September 12, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ,MICHAEL McNULTY, CITY MANAGER f' 1 FROM: WENDELL J. CLARKE, MAYOR; PAMELA LOUI, LIBRARY DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 SELECTION OF ARCHITECT FOR NEW CITY LIBRARY The Architect Selection Committee conducted interviews Saturday, September 8, 1984, to select an architect to build the new library. The committee members arrived at a unanimous decision to recommend Lawrence Enyart to the Council as the architect of choice to design the new Apache Junction Public Library. Mr. Enyart has had considerable experience in planning civic buildings in the Valley, among them are the Avondale Public Library and the Gilbert Public Library expansion. He was on the list of architects recommended by the State Library, Amok and was highly recommended by Mrs. Helen Nunn, Library Director at Gilbert Public Library, who has recently worked with him on the Gilbert Library addition. Approver for Agenda /1 te, Item # First Reading/ Sacond Reading — T_ Public Hearing Old Business _1'_ I.tew Business Cc,nsent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r 1,0) 1� ^, r,G v ,k ITEM # 091 MEETING OF 9 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNC I LMAN SHANKS j COUNCILMAN) DAMIANO tr- ...., VICE VMAYOR EIDSON / COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN aiLL J UNAN I"".OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED J ABSTAINED TOTAL L ITEM NO . 20 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT VAA,614/1-vit, Uyt BE DESIGNATED AS THE ARCHITECT FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION CI1TY LIBRARY . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR THE LIBRARY ARCHITECT . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ICI (P It) ( ITEM II_ ? MEETING 0 1 4//S MOTION BY : JAn'IlL- SECONDED BY: i I YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR / COUNCILMAN HILL �/ CO UNC I LMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR EIDSON Iit COUNC I LP1AN DAMIANO __ Y AR , UfN1A,' 'IOUS ,} IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL .r C77- ITEM NO. 21 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON OCTOBER 15 , 1984, AT 7 : 00 P .M . , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON OCTOBER 16 , 1984 , AT 6: 00 P .M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . MAGISTRATE COURT OF APACHE JUNCTION COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORT AUGUST, 1984 FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Civil Traffic, Criminal Traffic and Criminal Citations INCOME: Fines $13 , 364 . 50 Bonds 1 , 017 . 00 Proffessional Service 1 , 106 . 00 Misc. 509 . 50 $15 , 997 . 00 EXPENSES: Combined State taxes 6 , 676 . 88 Bonds refunded 72 . 00 Jury fee 432 . 00 Fines refunded 0 . 00 Proffessional Service 3, 423 . 00 Misc: 304 . 50 10 , 908 . 38 Net Receipts $ 5 , 088 . 62 FINE PAYMENTS OWED. FINED ASSESSED ATTY FEE ASSESSED TOTAL Fine Payments $ 63 , 409 . 15 $4 , 737 . 00 $ 68 , 146 . 15 Warrant outstanding 58 , 830 . 85 5 , 699 . 00 64 , 529 . 85 GRAND TOTAL 122 , 240 . 00 $10, 436 . 00 $132 , 676 . 00 FINES PAID OFF BY WORKING FOR CITY: 0 . 00 MAGISTRATE COURT OF APACHE JUNCTION COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORT AUGUST, 1984 CIVIL TRAFFIC Pending Citations forward 80 Monthly citations issued 133 TOTAL 213 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid 135 Default Judgment 17 Adjudged Not Responsible 0 152 TOTAL PENDING 61 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC Pending Citations forward 616 Monthly citations issued _ 199 ECK _ TOTAL 815 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid 76 Dismissed ( court ) 8 ( prosecutor ) Suspended sentence or probation Time served 84 TOTAL PENDING _ 7 31 CRIMINAL 518 Pending Citations forward 47 Monthly citations issued TOTAL 565 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid 74 Dismissed ( court ) 7 ( Prosecutor ) Suspended sentence or probation 2 Time served 0 83 TOTAL PENDING 482 UARRANTS Pending forward 697 Issued 26 TOTAL 723 Warrants cleared 20 TOTAL PENDING 703 7 ciACHE �G DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY '9R/Z01P it? o � vac�ie �s 2�3Zctian W E McDANIEL fer,or September 11, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Public Safety (,t).al. <� ,/ THROUGH: City Manager y�/t-[��.�,',,, SUBJECT. Departmental Report August 1984 Attached you will find the Departmental Report for August 1984. Accidents with and without injuries in August showed little change over July with the exception of private property accidents, which increased 500% over the previous month. Crimes against persons showed a slight decrease in August while property crimes showed an average increase of 35.6% over July. Traffic accidents and complaints are expected to climb in September as we see the gradual increase in winter visitors coming back to Apache Junction for their wintertime retirement. Animal Control as follows: Impound Fees $249.50 License Fees 130.00 Kennel Fees 0.00 Rabies Fees 137.50 Donation 100.00 Total Monies for August $617.00 Deposited to General Fund Total for 1984 $6200.50 Deposited to General Fund WEM/aes 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD. • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 Amok iiuyounded Adopted Dogs 114 26 Cate 55 16 Destroyed In Pound At End Of Month Dugs 74 11 Cats 40 0 Reclaimed Transferred To County Dogs 20 1 Cats 1 0 Dog Licenses Sold To Date 1984 Licensee: 718 Kennel Permits Sold To Date 1984 Kennel Permits: 4 Donations $100.00 Puppy Chow Citations Issued Dog Running At Large: 0 Unlicensed Dog: 0 Complaints 137 tDEPARTMENTAL ACTIVITY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC TOTAL ACCIDENTS* * 961 Accident-No Injury 962 Accident-Injury 961 23 22 15 12 9 6 9 10 106 963 Accident-Fatality S 4 9 4 2 3 2 0 0 24 AL 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 P Persons Injured , PP 15 17 7 11 9 9 3 15 86 or Killed 67 S Speed Related 962 13 16 6 7 9 4 5 7 103 AL Alcohol Related P 17 22 6 11 17 5 6 18 PP Private Property S 4 5 2 2 6 0 1 0 20 AL 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 5 963 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 P 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( TRAFFIC CITATIONS SPEED 42 41 28 38 25 41 53 84 407 ALCOHOL 8 11 10 15 13 10 9 6 82 WARNINGS 100 225 41 71 77 124 28 20 686 OTHER 165 215 170 134 151 131 137 145 1248 INDEX CRIMES MURDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 1 7 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BRUGLARY 13 18 13 15 16 24 15 19 133 AG. ASSAULT 3 4 3 7 0 1 4 2 24 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 0 0 1 1 3 0 2 3 284 LARCENY 44 46 24 40 35 31 28 36 2 ARSON 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 COMPLAINTS TAKEN 633 657 685 609 600 532 592 580 4888 C R.T. HITS ( FELONY 6 2 0 2 1 3 6 2 22 MISDEMEANOR10 10 16 18 3 15 20 10 102 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Library Board of Trustees August 7, 1984 A regular meeting of the Apache Junction Board of Trustees was held August 7, 1984, pursuant to notice, as prescribed by law. Roll Call -- Present Absent Hammer, Margaret Eldridge, Hazel /— Russell, Charles Hiller, Jan Lewis, Eleanor Pierce, Dwight Polomskey, Alice Staff present Pamela Loui, Librarian Others present. Elizabeth Burks, recording secretary, Friends of the Library 1 Acceptance of Agenda. Charles Russell moved to accept the agenda with the amendment that item (a) under 6 - New Business, be placed after item (1) Motion seconded by Alice Polomskey. This amendment was requested by Dwight Pierce, the new Board President 6. New Business a Mr Pierce stated that Pam Loui, Librarian, had brought to his attention that there is a difference between moving to table an item and to postpone it, according to Robert's Rules of Order If it is tabled, it is for a definite period of time a few minutes; an hour; or at the latest, the next meeting Postponing, on the other hand, can be for an indefinite period He also pointed out that we are a body selected by the City Council, not for political reasons, but to oversee the function of the Library and to be entrusted with the professional conduct of the meeting Only Library business should be discussed at the meetings; and he added, the City of Apache June will have a Library of which to be pr with the completion of the new building 2 Acceptance of minutes of Eleanor Lewis moved to accept the July 3, 1984, regular meeting, minutes and it was seconded by and the minutes of July 6, 1984, Charles Russell special meeting. 3. Librarian Report Pamela Loui, Librarian, reported a total of 4638 circulation, a sub- stantial increase over last month, which was 4409, and also over last year, which was 3312 The average daily circulation was 224, based on regular circulation Total figures .for the month include circu- lation by the Community Services Program. Report lists only 16 new titles added to the collection, because there has been no typist to prepare the cards, so books received have not been processed There will be more books going out and there has been an increase in the number of books purchased for children The books withdrawn from the collection were mostly worn-out The number of patron visits, 1480, was heavy considering the hot weather Seven story hours were held with 102 participating. Requests processed from interlibrary loans were 51, a large increase over last month and last year Thirty-five items were received. Three Summer Reading Programs were held with 45 participating One group that had been coming regularly, Junior Village, has been sold;and as they have a transportation problem now, they will not be coming in the future. They had requested the Librarian to visit them, but she pointed out that the program means to involve the child in the Library experience and it also would not be fair to other groups. 1 Fines on overdue books was $32 10 and cards to out-of-county netted $25 00 Donatations totaled $71 60 and $15 20 was realized for copies, a total of $143 90 She received a letter from the State i Library Association which stated that the State Advisory Council on the LSCA Grant is encouraging us to submit a request based on the proposal the , Board had approved It is encouraging but it is discouraging to hear that 70 other people had made a total request of over $900,000,and they received only $300,000 in funds last year So, we will make the request and receive partial funding Reports that she will be attending a reference workshop in Tempe and it will be covering reference works pertaining to our Library It will deal with the the reference interview, e g., getting from the patron the exact information that he is seeking Requests are often vague and are hard to pin down The other subjects will be on young adult and children's services, which we need We have neglected children and young adults' reference needs The summer reading program has ended now and she feels it was a great success When she asked for evalua- tions on the last day, she got favor- able comments 4 Committee reports. The architects selection committee, reported Eleanor Lewis, was presented with proposals from 6 architectural firms, and each of the 3 members took two of them home to study and returned them for two more, etc At their next meeting on August 13, they will narrow it to 2 or 3 The personal presentation by the architect will determine the decision Mike McNulty, the City Manager, said that the proceeds from the sale of the present Library Building and furnishings would be contributed to the new building Also, it was reported that the Senior Center Grant of $125,000, if received, would put the center in conjuction with the new library 5 Old Business a Decision on purchase of Pam Loui reports that she is still typewriter able to use the city typewriter, although it has no card platen IBM is the only typewriter usable, no other is made for this use. The new typist would decide the need for the platen. Charles Russell said that he types cards all day and agrees that the attachment is necessary. Alice Polomskey feels that it is important to have the cards type- written well, as they reflect on the quality of the Library She also moved that we authorize purchase of the proper machine as we have the funds available. Seconded by Dwight Pierce b Decision on purchase of tape/player/ The final decision was to have a tape recorder and magazine shelving player with Public Address capability, because it is within the budgeted amount Alice Polomskey and Eleanor Lewis felt it would be needed in the future, so it should be gotten now. Eleanor Lewis moved to purchase the Bell & Howell model and Alice Polomskey seconded it Pam Loui recommended Gaylord shelving for magazines because it would be metal; and as Charles Russell pointed out, wooden ones were impossible to dis- assemble and reassemble Eleanor Lewis moved that Pam be auth- orized to purchase Gaylord shelves and Charles Russell seconded 6 New Business b Review and revision of Library Dwight Pierce suggests that we table Bylaws this review until next meeting on Sept- ember 4, 1984 Alice Polomskey did so move and Eleanor Lewis seconded it. c Appointment of committee to It was decided that a committee is investigate Computer Applications not necessary, Pam would research software The State Library Confer- ence has a computer update in December Alice Polomskey moved to have Pam do research,and it was seconded by Charles Russell d Discussion of mandatory inventory Dwight Pierce reported that he had of Library holdings talked to M. McNulty and told him, to his surprise, that the Library has no inventory and that he thought that a computer would be of help so that we could interface with other units. Pam said that she had a student in the summer take the existing shelf list and handwritten cards for each book in the Library It will be in- complete as there are books out. Old lists are not properly compiled according to Library Science. 7 Call to Public Liz Burks had no criticism; she said that she had had some questions asked of her by Senior Citizens about the center 8 Request for future agenda items Discussion of Senior Center at Library Report on architects. 9 Adjournment Eleanor Lewis moved to adjourn, the l motion was seconded by Charles Russell i \ / 4-(. �L.(, • JAI[ President " Secretary ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0-/P j G ITEM #. d1 MEET I NG OF Ct MOTION BY: 1Viri 2, SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COH 1 i J N C. MAN.A'�11�4��1I ANO CoUNCILMANL ILL J COLINC ILr^AN TAYLOR / LOUNC I LMAN _SHANKS CF MAYOR EIDSON NCLMN YAM A UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Amok ram: Amok ITEM NO . 23 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P .M. I LdCL5 PULA a0®ta � aq _ " 'Y ' i'7-n S Ep4.I P laruxa7 _.cf",:..c. 3:,---7„ . Cr: I t WI-Urn--4---1 Al. : . Ai -)i -iii-TurgrinTut Arr. ,-; , • „ .J.., . ,, , _ . . • ,, .., ,,, _.,. -£GTV N "A 1 _ =VA—ION 96" c cr l r I 2 - 34or! 340Lt. 7 71 :..1 3 ...1 4 ---3GOt 560t • . 1 b 1)hGO tt "T 1" T G 12,0 4 1 7 I 720 c T141r;. 4-4 84,� L�, :. :.. - --- rat (_ _ .._:=-____L.4.�. tom.1 C,.. S_.," --_— _ e • \h/,,,,,....... 9 0 II 12 r 13 14 15 70 c5e.S Tb 156,6 Ch 1340 m 13Go dS 134.0 ar • ► i L FU.OF 1'L AN MI 11,a„=1,.0„ 41/ I 1 7 .0 d + i l i • Z -'I,i! I IliiIliII!ill 111JI1N I it I Ifili it 1 IIIIII!lil'lllli I��! o' i„,i,,,,.. y.c_0,,— , . !-- ff •til _ I N / 1.. .i % I , 6 ; I ../ 4 i i. jL\111; ' 1 I l ' 4: l - L aL,, . --.',2:_ iiiilling -I- 'IMOMIrilaWle • dyo'ra AVMaYP S I. For large map, please contact the Clerk's office oak. /ilk ROLL CALL 1 11K qo qlp _ fD ROLL CALL fP ESENT ABSENT I W.S. '( w.�/(kJ ✓ MAYOR � � i r / . VICE-MAYOR EIDSON ! '✓/ ✓ COUNCILMAN HILL _ ! ✓ ( / COUNCILMAN TAYLOR / / COUNCILMAN SHANKS / / • COUNCILMAN S I LELSMITH i ✓ ✓ � cOuNc I LMAr, DAf�1IAPJ0 ! / d TOTAL I 5 t . oZ q STAFF PRESENT S, /,t CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY a CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Chuck Newcomer DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel V• DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph 1(,,, JV„et CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: i L DATE: � 51 ADDRESS: D67 Y 4.) AGENDA ITEM: C /& J�1ti(t.G /llk - CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK l C NAME: �C�C � C � �. DATE: _"� _ ADDRESS: 10 L3 \ \ 5- k , c AGENDA ITEM: # ,/1 S -� row CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK c� NAME: ��v� �c��� . DATE: ADDRESS: � l �- + U b' J 0� AGENDA ITEM: �_ 1 V CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: REUBEN C. HAAS DATE: 9/18/84 ADDRESS: 1126 No. GOLDFIELD, APACHE JCT. , ARIZ . AGENDA ITEM: #Az/ (re/-,fC � S �e e /�