Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 10.16 City Council Regular Agenda `c P ACHE✓G2 O c� O c\\,,.....„ U 1 .V Z d `.RIZONP Z y Jac e �f uncti c 4on CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING •..., AGENDA OCTOBER 16, 1984 7: 00 P.M. 6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION (if required) 6: 00 P.M. WORK SESSION (if required) CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Proposed Ordinance No. 303, PZ-40-84, Application by David and Lauretta Druckman through Mike Kovacs to rezone a 3.4 acre parcel, located on southwest side of Highway 60, about 600 feet west of Cortez Road in Section 27, from Trailer ..► Homesite (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone. B. Proposed Ordinance No. 305 , PZ-42-84, Application by Ronald and Anna May Williams through Keith Stachar to rezone a 57, 000 square foot parcel, located at southeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus road in Section 21 , from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . C. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of September 18, 1984 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED GUESTS AND VISITORS AWARDS , PRESENTATIONS , AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 (3) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 308, PZ-44-84, Application by Arthur E. and Paul K. Golter represented by A.E. Sullivan of East Gate Realty to rezone a 5 acre parcel, located at northwest corner of the intersection of West Roundup Street and North Delaware Drive in Section 18, from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 309, PZ-45-84, Application by Fred and Lorene Sowash , Ray and So Yun Higgins , and Robert and Rosemary Kim, and Lyman and Virginia Morkunas represented by Ione Chovanec of East Gate Realty to rezone 5 acre parcel, located at northwest corner of the intersection of North Delaware Drive and West Shiprock Street in Section 18, from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (First Reading) (5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 310, PZ-46-84, Application by A. Russell and Mary Nielson and E. James and Irene Lunt to rezone 182, 000 square foot parcel, located 200 ' north of West Apache Trail , 400 ' west of North Delaware Drive in Section 19, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. (First Reading) (6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 316 , PZ-50-84, Application by Morton Seltzer (Randall Industries) to rezone 10 acres , located at the northwest corner of East 16th Avenue and South Winchester Road in Section 28, from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-4/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development . (First Reading) (7) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 317 , PZ-51-84, Application by H. Dan Crye to rezone 1 1/4 acre parcel, located at southwest corner of East 5th Avenue and Royal Palm Road , approximately 300 ' north of U.S . Hwy 60 in Section 21 , from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. (First Reading) (8) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 307, AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO LIQUOR LICENSE (With Emergency Clause) (Postponed Item) (9) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 325 , AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO SALES TAX ON ADVERTISING (With Emergency Clause) (10) APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE BY SUNRISE R.V. RESORT (11) APPLICATION FOR SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE, JR' S PIZZA OLD BUSINESS (12) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217 , PZ-30-83 , Application by Greg Hamblin of Hamblin Diversified to rezone a 4 acre parcel, from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD and a 39, 000 square foot parcel from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5, located between Plaza and Monterey Drives , 120 feet north of 20th Avenue. (Second Reading) (13) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288, PZ-29-84, Application by A. Richard and Jennie Damiano to rezone 4. 15 acre parcel, located at the southeast corner of Highway 88 and E. Hidalgo Street in Section 15, from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. (Second Reading) (Postponed Item) (14) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 289, PZ-31-84, Application by Dunrite Asphalt , Inc . , through Bob Cosby to rezone a 12 acre parcel, located on southwest side of Highway 60, 800 feet northwest of Tomahawk Road in Section 28, from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. (Second Reading) (Postponed Item) (15) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304, PZ-41-84, Application by Robert Christensen and Ronald and Anna May Williams to rezone a 2 acre parcel , located at northeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 , from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . (Second Reading) (16a) AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION (Superstition View Subdivision) (16b) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PUEBLO R.V. RESORT (17) APPOINTMENT TO SUBDIVISION/ANNEXATION COMMITTEE NEW BUSINESS (18) ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM AND APPOINTMENT TO LIBRARY BOARD (19) SELECTION OF DATE FOR TOWN HALL PUBLIC FORUM (20) RECOGNITION OF AND APPOINTMENT TO EAST VALLEY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TASK FORCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITY (21) REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO CLEAN PROPERTY, ARTICLE 9-2 OF CITY CODE (22) AUTHORIZATION TO ACCELERATE HIRING OF ENGINEERING AIDE AND POLICE OFFICER (23a) ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR FILLING COUNCIL VACANCIES (23b) ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM AND APPOINTMENT TO CITY COUNCIL (24) WORK SESSION, NOVEMBER 5 , 1984 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, NOVEMBER 6, 1984 CALL TO THE PUBLIC (25) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (26) ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS . " ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES pr./ a/ ITEM # MEETING OF I MOTION BY : SECONDED BY I- YES NO ABSTAINED MAYOR P�AYOR FTnSON . NC t N. 7:--- •� .COUNC I LMR"I T_AYLOR I COUNCILMAN Hill .COUNCILMAN DAMIANO J _MAYOR CLARKE UNANIm..OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL r�. ITEM NO . 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . , , (r,,,,,,,,..., , ,,,,,„,, ,, ,,r„ t,,1 2 : '-'15z ar,: `�. i`0� it a 4aoie c unctwn DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM : THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: i ! MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: C ,; CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-40-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16 , 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-40-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 303, is a request by the applicants David and Lauretta Druckman through Mike Kovacs to rezone their property from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 3.4 acre parcel located on the southwest side of Highway 60, about 600 feet west of Cortez Road in Section 27. It is designated General Commercial Opportunity/Medium-High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include Cortez Trailer Park, a machine shop, and a house. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the General Commercial General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. �, Approver for Agenda �—� .75(t 5 �! i'I i Item fi First Reading T Second Reading/ /(r i .--79 Hearing _ Old Business New Business 1/Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-40-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 303) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Vehon 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-40-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 303, application of David and Lauretta Druckman for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zcre, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: The applicant dedicate the south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . This commercial rezoning is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. 2. It is the best use of the property at this time. " CRN:mas '� PZ-40-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303 PROPOSED REZONE FROM TRAILER NOPIESITE ZONE (TH) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE /6%. .— I fxis /ia. Roads 7 si wy. . ' TH- I CS cap ,w . ' '^ ..•, '• I, z s `ti .` . e is b• I I _ — CC)= o i. . CB-2 =� EAST 20TH AVENU ., • ..ai r II _ 7 1 1 11 CB-2 I '' 1 I I I 1 I I CI TH I I Tff I_, U I I -` I I I I I ci Y 1 I I i I it, II_ — _ -i L I ' ND AVENU''"_"""'s;, -------' "fit. -' ,. ' E SUBJECT SITE N SCALE• 1" = 200' ii-1 I__I LIMITS OF ZONING (REI7AINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) W^—s ORDINANCE NO 303 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-40-84 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ISECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The West } of the Southeast * of the Northeast 3 of the Southwest 3 of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 . Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk I APPROVED AS TO FORM. D vi `F AlexandAgliAC e City Attorney sue. nr PZ-40-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303 PROPOSED REZONE FROM TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE Ark I-------� EAST 18TH AVENUE I 1 Fq S T Q 476,7 y�gy TH .= 60 J C)< cc Q cc cc d CI I\ = C I— PQ wI \ _ = zi N o o o I CB-2 `\\I I- --- --- I-- _J EAST 20TH AVENUE -- -----I I II --1¢ I I I II I= I I I I CB-2 I I I II 1 w QI I I� Ic cc s-• 1 TH I TH 1_ �- �t I I Io I I I I F-I I I = I I cD• 1 I I I -- - - - L-- --1 A D AVENUE 1 r, SUBJECT SITE 111 SCALE. 1" = 200' I_ I LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) //' ' \ U it ji ' • z gRiZ„ c itf o ,*ache2unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL i THROUGH: ` 'A MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: L 'CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-42-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 305) , SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-42-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 305, is a request by the applicants Ronald and Anna May Williams through Keith Stachar and Mike Kovacs to rezone their property from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a 57,000 square foot parcel developed with a mobile home and located at the southeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/ High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses ... include mobile homes and vacant land. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. The staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Staff also recommends that this site not be allowed to be developed into an RV or mobile home park unless otherwise permitted by the City. Approver for Agenda /�i to , Item # First Reading th2E Second Reading o __1CPublic Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-42-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 305) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Tepolt/Jorgensen 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-42-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 305, application of Ronald and Anna May Williams for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the north and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited; except as otherwise permitted by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. .•. 2. It seems the best use of the land at this time. 3. It is in accordance with the prescribed density. " CRN:mas I 1 PZ-42-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 305 1 1 I I PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) I U .. 7: 1 e1 ot. I I CR-5 1, --.- PROPOSED I 1 I' I TH 1 i t r I ' I Ir L v __ _ 7. 7. Z —_ s1 i ;2...4.7:,::,.... zr;� I I I 1 1 1----1 1 1 I o I A _ __ II j = II I f--- I CR-5 II CR-L! 1 I II I }- I I 1 II I I II I L .- - - ----- --IL_----4 1 SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 200' ] LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) r_1s s ORDINANCE NO. 305 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING; THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-42-84 FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as• The west 243 feet of the North # of the Northwest a of the Southeast of the Northeast k of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicant dedicate the north and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) that the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST• Kathleen Connelly { City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Davi A exan e City Attorney 3 s PZ-42-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 305 PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) ..... 1 I---- ----, I I I i I I I I -' f --------1 I I I I CR-5 I I PROPOSED I I I I I 1 I I --- -- - - --_ - 1 EAST SCENIC STREET rI 1 1 1----1 1 1.. I o II I = I 11- CR-5 1 CR-4 I I I � 1 I I o I I I 1 I 1 .j SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 200' r 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on September 18, 1984, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Vice Mayor Eidson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Reverend Mcllhenny led the Invocation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Lieutenant Garcia led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Hill, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano Vice Mayor Eidson Councilmen Absent Councilman Steelsmith Mayor Clarke Staff Present: Acting City Manager, Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark Amok Others Present State Representative Roy Hudson 2084 W. 9th Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Dick McGhan 2910 W. Indian School Rd. Phoenix, Arizona Ms Susan Goodwin 2712 N. 7th St. Phoenix, Arizona 85006 Mr Reuben C. Haas 1126 N. Goldfield Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Jerry Foster, newsman Channel 12 Mr. Greg Hamblin Hamblin Diversified Father Charles Maloney St George's Church r s--s Mr. Mike Kovacs 710 S Lawson Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr Keith Stachar 6301 E. Roundup Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Nelson Wing 269 N. Winchester Rd. oink Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 246, PZ-52-83, APPLICATION BY WEITKAMP CORP., RUTH SAMBORSKI, AND HERBERT MILLER THROUGH G. BRENT TEEPLES TO REZONE A 14.82 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED BETWEEN MERIDIAN AND WARNER DRIVES AND LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND WINDSONG STREET IN SECTION 18 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; B. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 297, PZ-35-84, APPLICATION BY RICHARD HERBERT, AMERICAN BUSINESS CORP., ALBERT AND THOMAS MEAKER, AND WILLIAM MURPHY TO REZONE A 4 6 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BROADWAY AND SAN MARCOS DRIVE IN SECTION 29, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE; C. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 299, PZ-37-84, APPLICATION BY VERNE GRAVES TO REZONE 5 ACRE PARCEL, LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF CACTUS ROAD, 300 FEET SOUTH OF SCENIC STREET IN SECTION 21, FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1984, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. Introduction of Distinguished Guests and Visitors Vice Mayor Eidson introduced Mr. Jerry Foster, newsman, for Channel 12. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Vice Mayor Eidson presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Mr. Jerry Foster and Sky 12 for support of the "Child Identification Day", and to other participants of the program which included police department staff and K Mart personnel. Chief McDaniel presented a plaque to Jerry Foster for his efforts in the program REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 2 Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel informed the Council that the youngest child to participate was three weeks old, and this day represented many manpower hours donated by the police department and K Mart employees CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217, PZ-30-83 HAMBLIN (First Reading) Vice Mayor Eidson opened the hearing to the public. Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer addressed the application for rezoning from CR-3 Single Residence Zone to CR-5/PD for Parcel No. 1 and to CR-5 for Parcel No 2, both located between Plaza and Monterey Drives, 120 feet north of 20th Avenue, and outlined the proposed property uses Mr. Greg Hamblin, outlined the original proposed project of a 22-lot four plex subdivision, and ex- plained that the subdivision has been changed to 34 twin-homes in Parcel No. 1 and four lots with four units on each on Parcel No. 2, and requested approval of this proposal. Father Charles Maloney, pastor of St. George's Church, addressed the Council in objection to the four-plex units. Mr Jim Bakkedahl, 1891 S Buena Vista, Apache Junction, expressed objection to the multi-family dwellings proposed, but was in favor of the twin-homes Vice Mayor Eidson asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Vice Mayor Eidson called upon the Director of Planning for recommen- dations. Mr Newcomer stated that the Development Coordinating Committee has no objections and the Planning staff requested that the floor plans be revised, and that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval with the exception of mul- tiple family dwellings in Parcel No. 2. Mr. Hamblin further commented on the proposals, stating that they do comply with the neighborhood. Father Maloney rebutted with additional objections. Vice Mayor Eidson closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 217, by title only for the first reading City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 217, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 3 PZ-30-83 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 303, PZ-40-84, DRUCKMAN (First Reading) Vice Mayor Eidson opened the hearing to the public. Mr Newcomer briefed the Council on the application for rezoning from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone of a 3 4 acre parcel, located on the southwest side of Highway 60 about 600 feet west of Cortez Road in Section 27 Mr. Mike Kovacs, 710 S Lawson, Apache Junction, requested approval of the application. Councilman Taylor wished to know what was the proposed property use Mr. Kovacs stated that there are no plans at this time. Vice Mayor Eidson asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Vice Mayor Eidson called upon the Director of Planning for recommen- dations Mr Newcomer stated that the Planning staff has no objections to the rezoning, and the Planning and Zoning Commission also recommends approval with stipulations for dedi- cation of rights-of-way. Vice Mayor Eidson closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 303, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 303, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-40-84 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304, PZ-41-84, CHRISTENSEN AND WILLIAMS (First Reading) Vice Mayor Eidson opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Newcomer addressed the application for rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) of a two-acre parcel, located at the northeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21. Mr. Keith Stachar, 6301 E Roundup, Apache Junction, stated that the purpose of the rezoning is to divide the property into smaller lots. Councilman Damiano asked if there was a mobile home on the property at present. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Stachar confirmed this and explained that the property owner wishes to place one more building on the parcel Vice Mayor Eidson asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Vice Mayor Eidson called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations. Mr. Newcomer stated that the Planning staff notes that this request is in compliance with the general plan, providing no mobile home park is developed on this property, and that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application Vice Mayor Eidson closed hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 304, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 304, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-41-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 305, PZ-42-84, WILLIAMS (First Reading) Vice Mayor Eidson opened the 1 hearing to the public. Mr Newcomer stated that this request is for rezoning from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone of a 57,000 square foot parcel located at the southwest corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21. Mr. Stachar requested approval of this application, to enable this parcel to be divided into three lots Vice Mayor Eidson asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Vice Mayor Eidson called upon the Director of Planning for recommendations. Mr Newcomer stated that the Planning staff has no objections with stipulations, and that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application. Vice Mayor Eidson closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 305, by title only for the first reading City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 305, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-42-84 FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 5 oink Am*, PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 306, PZ-43-84, TALBOT ) Vice Mayor Eidson stated that a letter had been submitted by Mr. Talbot requesting that the application be withdrawn No action was taken in accordance with Mr Talbot's request. Vice Mayor Eidson recessed the meeting Vice Mayor Eidson reconvened the meeting at 8:05 p.m. OLD BUSINESS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 289, PZ-31-84 DUNRITE ASPHALT (Postponed Item) ) City Attorney David Alexander stated that this item requires a three-quarter vote, and there are only five councilmembers present. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 289 BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1984. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288, PZ-29-84, DAMIANO (Postponed Item) ) Vice Mayor Eidson asked that Zoning Administrator Leo Frazier explain the zoning question asked at the last meeting pertaining to this item. Mr Frazier explained that the proposed use of golf cart renovation does not comply with the requested rezoning and would require a "light industry zone". Mr Newcomer stated that the adjacent zoning are CB-2 General Business. Councilman Damiano reiterated that this type of use is not appropriate in CB-1 or CB-2 zoning. Mr. Frazier confirmed this. City Attorney Alexander suggested that this item be postponed until the applicant is officially notified that this zoning cannot be utilized for the proposed use, giving the applicant the option to change the zoning request The Council agreed with this recommendation Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288, PZ-29-84, BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1984. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 6 VOTE In Favor Councilman Shanks, Councilman Hill, Councilman Taylor, Vice Mayor Eidson Abstained: Councilman Damiano (possible conflict of interest) The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 298, PZ-36-84, BEEMAN AND JOHNSON (Second Reading) ) Vice Mayor Eidson expressed concern of the close proximity to a church, due the possibility of an establishment serving liquor being allowed with CB-2 General Business zoning. Councilman Shanks commented that the State law allows 300 feet from a church and this is the only restriction the Council is permitted City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated that a Supreme Court decision only included schools and not churches in regard to liquor sales and their proximity to other buildings. Councilman Hill asked if a stipulation could be placed within the ordinance excluding liquor serving establishments from the possible uses. Councilman Shanks expressed her feeling that this shouldn't be done against a Supreme Court ruling especially not knowing what the applicant proposes to do with the property Mr. Keith Stachar, represen- tative of the applicant, stated that they would not be in objection to a stipulation of this sort. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 298, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Vice Mayor Eidson called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 298, by title only for the second reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 298, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-36-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING 1 ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 298, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 7 Aooks REZONING CASE PZ-36-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 300, PZ-38-84, HUDSON (Second Reading) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 300, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. Vice Mayor Eidson called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 300, by title only for the second reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 300, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-38-84 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 300, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-38-84 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried APPOINTMENT TO SUBDIVISION AND/OR ANNEXATION COMMITTEE Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPOINTMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION AND/OR ANNEXATION COMMITTEE BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1984 Councilman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 8 The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 83-18, AB-83-7, BARBER, KOERNER, HAAS, LAABS, JONES, SIERRA ENTERPRISES INC., POLEGA, ARMSBY AND YEAGER (Postponed Item) City Engineer Jim Bakkedahl briefed the Council on the request for abandonment of Manzanita Street, Mockingbird Street, and Greasewood Street from North Hilton to North Goldfield Road, and stated that the Development Coordinating Committee has no objection to the request Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 83-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON MANZANITA STREET, AND GREASEWOOD STREET FROM NORTH HILTON ROAD TO NORTH GOLDFIELD ROAD, AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-83-7, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE• In Favor: Councilman Shanks, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Eidson Opposed: Councilman Hill The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 84-50, AB-83-7, HAAS AND YEAGER (Postponed Item) ) Mr. Bakkedahl briefed the Council on the proposed abandonment of Roundup Street from North Hilton Road to North Goldfield Road, which is not presently maintained by the City, and stated that the Development Coordinating Committee felt that this reservation should be retained, due to Roundup's classification as a collector street, and may be needed to service future development in the area Mr. Rueben Haas, 1126 N. Goldfield Rd., Apache Junction, addressed the Council in approval of the abandonment Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 84-50, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON ROUNDUP STREET FROM NORTH HILTON ROAD TO NORTH GOLDFIELD ROAD, AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-83-7, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. Councilman Shanks and Vice Mayor Eidson both felt that this road would be utilized in the near future and should not be abandoned REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 9 VOTE' In Favor: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Hill, Councilman Damiano Opposed Councilman Shanks, Vice Mayor Eidson The motion carried. NEW BUSINESS TIME EXTENSION FOR PLANNED oink,DEVELOPMENT, ORDINANCE NO. 55, PZ-7-79, SCHUSTER ) Mr. Newcomer stated that this is a one-year time extension for a Planned Development which was ori- ginally approved on September 3, 1980 and shows good cause for the extension Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE REQUESTED EXTENSION OF ONE (1) YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 4, 1985, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED TO SUBMIT REQUIRED APPLICATION MATERIALS FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE FIRST STAGE OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS SET FORTH IN REZONING CASE PZ-7-79, ORDINANCE NO. 55. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. TIME EXTENSION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PZ-12-79, ORDINANCE NO 56, LAWTHER ) Mr. Newcomer stated that this is a request for a one-year time extension for a Planned Development for a 12-unit complex, which was granted one extension which expires on October 4, 1984, and that they do have a confirmed report on the progress completed. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION ENDING OCTOBER 4, 1985, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED TO ALLOW SUBMITTAL OF REQUIRED MATERIALS FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS SET FORTH IN REZONING CASE PZ-12-79, ORDINANCE NO. 56. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE, APACHE JUNCTION REACH OUT, INC. Councilman Shanks explained that this is the community's food bank and that they are requesting emergency funds. Mr. Nelson Wing, 269 N. Winchester Rd , Apache Junction stated that due to the growth of needy families and the source of many funds being winter visitors, the assistance would tide them over until the return of winter visitors REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 10 Ask Councilman Taylor asked how much was usually spent per month Mr Wing stated that $490.00 per month was the average. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE SUBMITTED BY APACHE JUNCTION REACH OUT, INC., BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $500.00, TO BE TAKEN FROM ACCOUNT NO 005-105-513-14-29 Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. AWARD OF BIDS FOR PHASE I, STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Zoning Administrator/Building Official Leo Frazier, Jr , addressed the item reporting that there were two low bidders for the project. City Attorney David Alexander asked the following questions of both bidders, C & F Equipment Co., Inc., and Rein Schultz & Dahl: 1 How long has the company been in existence and how long have they paid state and local taxes. 2 Has there ever been any litigation with governmental entities or any complaints registered, or any threatened suits by governmental entities on public works projects. Ms Susan Goodwin, 2712 N. 7th St., Phoenix, Arizona 85006, representing C & F Equipment Co., Inc., replied that the company has been in existence at least 16 years and has had not threatened suits or complaints. Councilman Shanks asked if this law firm has any monetary interest in the company Ms Goodwin replied that the only interest is as legal counsel, and continued to outline the bid proposal Mr. Dick McGhan, 3910 W. Indian School, Phoenix, further outlined the street improvement proposal A representative of Rein Schultz & Dahl replied that the company has been in business and paying taxes for 1 1/2 years, and were in litigation with a City of Phoenix project, regarding their status in the State, and that this is a joint bid with ABCO, and has had no complaints or threatened suits. He added that they had won the suit regarding status as a bidder Mr Frazier made recommen- dations based on individual bids Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE BIDS FOR THE STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDING PROGRAM PHASE I BE AWARDED AS FOLLOWS REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 11 PW-84-6 IN THE AMOUNT OF $62, 145.00 TO C & F EQUIPMENT CO , INC. PW-84-7 IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,750.00 TO C & F EQUIPMENT CO , INC. PW-84-8 IN THE AMOUNT OF $82,219.00 TO C & F EQUIPMENT CO., INC. PW-84-9 IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,865.00 TO C & F EQUIPMENT CO., INC PW-84-10 IN THE AMOUNT OF $70,336.00 TO C & F EQUIPMENT CO , INC. PW-84-11 IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,781 00 TO REIN SCHULTZ & DAHL/ABCO PW-84-12 IN THE AMOUNT OF $83,742.34 TO REIN SCHULTZ & DAHL/ABCO AT A TOTAL COST OF $468,838.34. Councilman Hill seconded the motion /1 VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. AUTHORIZATION FOR ENGINEER CONSULTANTS FOR PHASE II, STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Mr. Bakkedahl explained that this award of bid is for consulting engineers in Phase II of the bonding street improvement program, with an approximate size of 7.2 miles, with a cumulative total of $47,200.00. Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO EXPEND $47,200 FOR CONSULTING SERVICES AND ENGINEERING WORK TO 1. ANDERSON-NELSON, INC FOR PW-84-15 ROUNDUP - IRONWOOD TO SAN MARCOS AND PW-84-22 TEPEE - MERIDIAN TO DELAWARE 2 MUNICIPAL DESIGNERS & CONSULTANTS, LTD. FOR PW-84-16 JUNCTION - TOMAHAWK TO GOLDFIELD 3. O'DELL & ASSOCIATES FOR PW-84-13 LOST DUTCHMAN - IRONWOOD TO IDAHO 4 PARKER & ASSOCIATES FOR PW-84-14 SHIPROCK - MERIDIAN TO MAIN 5. ROYDEN ENGINEERING COMPANY FOR PW-84-20 STARR - BROADWAY TO U.S HWY 60 6. WILLIAM J NORMAN FOR PW-84-18 SOUTHERN - RAINDANCE TO CORTEZ AND PW-84-19 CORTEZ - SOUTHERN TO U.S HWY 60 7. WILSON & COMPANY FOR PW-84-17 4TH AVENUE - TOMAHAWK TO GOLDFIELD 8. WLB GROUP, INC. FOR PW-84-21 HILTON - SUPERSTITION TO BROADWAY Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. SELECTION OF ARCHITECTS FOR CITY LIBRARY Councilman Damiano addressed the item stating that the committee for selection chose Mr Lawrence Enyart as the architect of choice out of five applicants. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT LAWRENCE ENYART BE DESIGNATED AS THE ARCHITECT FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY LIBRARY. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR THE LIBRARY ARCHITECT. Councilman Damiano estimated that the new library should be completed September 1, 1985. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 12 Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 15, 1984 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 16, 1984 Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON OCTOBER 15, 1984, AT 7:00 P M , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 1984, AT 6:00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. CALL TO THE PUBLIC State Representative Roy Hudson, 2084 W 9th Avenue, Apache Junction, Arizona, thanked the Council for approval on his rezoning application and stated that he would support a bill on the liquor license regulations again this year, and that the new college site has been chose as Southern Avenue INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Councilman Taylor reported that there will be Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee meeting on Thursday, at 7 00 p m REQUESTS OF COUNCIL None ADJOURNMENT Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 9 40 P.M. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1984, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 13 ir—nr Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST „oft, Kathleen Connelly City Clerk I I REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 14 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES �J V(' ITEM # v MEETING OF I lib b MOTION BY: 4cr)r) SECONDED BY ; 0/1111L' YES NO ABSTAI NED COMIC il MANIAMIAN0 COUNC I LMANLHI LL CO(_UNCILNLAN TAYLOR l/ Mittfslr _VICF MAYOR EIDSON I MAYOR CLARKE • ✓ UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 14 I a ITEM NO . 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 303 , PZ-40-84 , APPLICATION BY DAVID AND LAURETTA DRUCKMAN THROUGH MIKE KOVACS TO REZONE A 3 .4 ACRE PARCEL , LOCATED ON SOUTHWEST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 60 , ABOUT 600 FEET WEST OF CORTEZ ROAD IN SECTION 27 , FROM TRAILER HOMESITE ( TH ) TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; B : PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 305 , PZ-42-84 , APPLICATION BY RONALD AND ANNA MAY WILLIAMS THROUGH KEITH STACHAR TO REZONE A 57 , 000 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL , LOCATED AT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SCENIC STREET AND CACTUS ROAD IN SECTION 21 , FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE ( TH ) ; AND C : ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES FROM THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18 , 1984 , ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 308 PZ-44-84 THE APPLICANT IS GOLTER 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME. 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED PQACi-►E dG VA U `! .! „ L O \\:**1/4: Oat.::::: '41RIZ40 14 1.' ity ot C pache c&unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1984 Approver for Agenda / 1, - First Rwnc:+••; �,' , ,1, . MEMORANDUM , THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL r r T'��� J `':) r%� '/r'ubl•c Fie:r:ng THROUGH: (` 4 MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER 0id Business New Business FROM: Ceti CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Consent Agenda SUBJECT- REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-44-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 308) OCTOBER 16, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING NOVEMBER 6, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Arthur E. and Paul K. Goiter represented by A.E. Sullivan of East Gate Realty. REQUESTED REZONING: GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of West Roundup Street and North Delaware Drive in Section 18. SUBJECT SITE SIZE: 5 acres (less roadway easements). PRESENT USE: Vacant. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential-Medium/High Density Opportunity. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding neighborhood is a combination of mobile home parks and mobile homes on individual lots with GR zoning. REZONING IMPLICATIONS: The proposed TH zoning would permit a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet for mobile homes on individual lots. If the property were combined with an adjacent 5 acre tract to create a travel trailer park, minimum space size would be 1 ,000 square feet. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-44-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 308) September 26, 1984 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Department has no objection to the requested rezoning to TH, but would recommend the following stipulations: 1. That the east forty feet (40' ) and the south and west ~ thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer or RV park, unless otherwise approved by the City. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of September 25, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Jorgensen/Tepolt 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-44-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 308, application of Arthur E. and Paul K. Golter for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are. 1. That the east forty feet (40' ) and the south and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes. .-. 2. That the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer or RV park, unless otherwise approved by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. The request is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. 2. It is the best use of the property at this time. " CRN•mas 3 _ "�. i 1 1 I 1 ' irlip2P -6) r s 6-0- )j,,A3,,F) $ PROPOo NE/ AT RURAL /V, H R4E-i./...5Z2711 _ ie,,442-5 '';t ; 1, 4 11 7-1i I TEl t I ; i L=- ! - lPROPOSE TH- 1 ' ij L :IMPOP440". i I 1 ,ii7 -- I THE 1 II -- TH - i � Ipa 1 1i i I I- I imur:t• f I / . .t..4;_11 jL1± i - FEEiii -r I I �� I. I. 11 1 «Z f 7 1 I a SUBJECT SITE N SCALE- 1" = 300' `� i : ,__r LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS IJENERAL RURAL) 4 gay ORDINANCE NO .2A8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-4:0-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL "aftk The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The South 2 of the Southeast 1 of the Northeast ; of the Southwest of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations 1 That the east forty feet (40') and the south and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2 That the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer or RV park, unless otherwise approved by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 emilk Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM avi Alexan City Attorney s PZ-44-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 308 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) WEST TEP� STR-FT I-- 1 I ------ I TH 1 TH I I I I I -- '--__1 PROPOSES TH 1 1 I WEST SHIPROCK STREET r-----i r---1 r - I TH I TH1 TH L______1 i I I I I I I I I I I � L_— J w/ Q > w 3 WEST ROUNDUP STREET > I 1 >1 I w a TH 1 �i TH 1 " CR-5 iz IWI I a 1 a II 1 QI --I Q I= •,,,,,1 �' ix z I z 11.11111111 I I I „ . , noes i ggg SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 300' I ] LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) r"= ITEM NO. 3 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 308 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 309, PZ-45-84 THE APPLICANT IS SOWASH, HIGGINS, KIM, MORKUNAS 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING .�• COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A, APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED k PgACHF✓G O + y n� , U l ,; -.........„) gR/ZOO.,„:. o +pa`Oily che unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1984 / , Approver for Agenda Date Item # _ L/ First Reading /?/ { MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL� Second Reading THROUGH: v//MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Hearing __-_c.Old Business FROM: ( ) CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-45-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 309) OCTOBER 16, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING NOVEMBER 6, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION BACKGROUND APPLICANTS: Fred and Lorene Sowash, Ray and So Yun Higgins, Robert and Rosemary Kim, and Lyman and Virginia Morkunas represented by Ione Chovanec of East Gate Realty. REQUESTED REZONING: GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of North Delaware Drive and West Shiprock Street in riftsSection 18. SUBJECT SITE SIZE: 5 acres (less easements). PRESENT USE: Undeveloped. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION• Residential : Medium/High Density Opportunity. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: GR and TH zoning in surrounding neighborhood with mobile homes and mobile home parks. REZONING IMPLICATIONS: TH zoning will permit a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet for homes on an individual lot and 1,000 square feet for spaces in a travel trailer park 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 /MI p The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-45-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 309) September 26, 1984 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff has no objection to the rezoning due to the character of development in the neighborhood and the rezoning would be consistent with the General Plan density designation for the site. Staff would recommend that the following stipulations be included: 1. That the east forty feet (40' ) and the south and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer, or RV park, unless otherwise approved by the City. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of September 25, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Tepolt/Hoaglin 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-45-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 309, application of Fred and Lorene Sowash, Ray and So Yun Higgins, Robert and Rosemary Kim, and Lyman and Virginia Morkunas for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. That the east forty feet (40' ) and the south and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer, or RV park, unless otherwise approved by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. It is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 2. It seems to be the best use of the property at this time. " CRN:mas ORDINANCE NO. 309 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-45-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, 1— ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as: Parcel No 1 The South of the East } of the South } of the Northeast of the Northeast of the Southwest * of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona Parcel No 2 The East of the North } of the South ? of the Northeast / of the Northeast of the Southwest of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. Parcel No 3 The West } of the South } of the Northeast of the Northeast ; of the Southwest 1 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona Parcel No 4 The East of the West z of the South of the Northeast of the Northeast of the Southwest a of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, ^ be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations. 1) that the east forty feet (40') and the south and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) that the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer, or RV park, unless otherwise approved by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this anypart of the code adopted herein byreference is for Ordinance or p anyreason held to be invalid or unconstitutional bythe decision of any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainingportions ns thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF _ , 19 a""=. 411 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ^ ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM D vise( xa City Attorney it I ORDINANCE NO 309 PAGE TWO OF TWO 3 PZ-45-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 309 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) WFST SMOKFTRFF STRFET r I I ----, Th TH 1 i L WEST TEPEE STREET I-- l r -I 1 I I G 1 TH TH 1 I I I L--- IIX w 1 IQ > I IW CC , A LU w----- WEST SHIPROCK STREETS -_-- wII N I I w r----- -1 I Aft.. Zi� TH QI I 1 S = THI HI TH 1- ~ I � I 0 01 _J z1 zZ ------ I 1 1 , I PROPOSED TH 1 I S 1 SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 300' i-i L _J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) Al r.. r--1 PZ-45-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 309 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) .0. I WEST SMOKFTRFE STRFET 1 TH TH 1 1 I WEST TEPEE STREET TH I I TH i II I I 1, '_.-I I / w I IQ >UJ > I w_ AQ A1- ----I > UJ tY w H WEST SHIPROCK STREETS zt wI 1 I w r----------- —1r� .�. ?I TH J ; 1 1 QI I _ = TH j F I TH I 1— I— c I 1 0 01 J cc, 1 zz ----------- I 1 I 1 I PROPOSED TH 1 1 I S I SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 300' _J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• D vi xa b — City ttorney ORDINANCE NO. 309 PAGE TWO OF TWO ITEM NO . 4 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 309 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 310, PZ-46-84 THE APPLICANT IS NIELSON AND LUNT 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING ^ COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED y� r V z \\&?/zox4i''' zt ot pax cuncticn DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1984 Approver for Agenda item �.. Date . MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading i-4/ Second Reading THROUGH: , MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER _ ubtic Hearing _Old Business FROM: cyJ CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM .,,r Consent Agenda PZ-46-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 310) OCTOBER 16, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING NOVEMBER 6, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION BACKGROUND APPLICANTS: A. Russell and Mary Nielson- and E. James and Irene Lunt. REQUESTED REZONING: GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: 200' north of West Apache Trail , 400' west of North Delaware Drive in Section 19. SUBJECT SITE SIZE: 182,000 square feet. PRESENT USE: Undeveloped. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION. General Commercial . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: To the east and south of the subject site is CB-2 zoning and commercial uses; to the west is CI-1 zoning; and to the north is CR-3 (Haven Hollow Unit 2 Subdivision) and TH (Enchanted Acres Subdivision). REZONING IMPLICATIONS: The applicants have stated their intentions to develop the subject site (which includes the remainder of the parcel to the south already zoned CB-2) into a motel , restaurant, office, and shopping complex. Access would be taken from Apache Trail . The only major potential problem would be possible disturbance to the residential areas to the north. ;u01 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-46-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 310) September 26, 1984 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff has no objection to the proposed rezoning noting that it is consistent with the General Plan and is a logical classification for property accessed by the Apache Trail in that area. Staff' s only concern would be buffering for the residential neighborhood to the north. Short of proceeding with a Planned Development, the only assurance of adequate buffering would be a reliance on the developer' s sense of community responsibility. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ADDED STIPULATION A stipulation added by the Planning and Zoning Commission was that a solid masonry wall be placed along the northern boundary of this property as it' s developed to help serve as a buffer between this property and the single- family residences to the north. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of September 25, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Vehon/Jorgensen 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-46-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 310, application of A. Russell and Mary Nielson and E. James and Irene Lunt for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: A solid masonry wall be placed along the northern boundary of this property as it' s developed to help serve as a buffer between this property and the single-family residences to the north. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. This zoning would be in compliance with the City of Apache Junction which allows a potential general business zone in this area. 2. That this property would warrant general business zoning due to its proximity to the State highway and the traffic that the State highway affords. 3. That the City of Apache Junction would best be served by the extension of this CB-2 zoning to the north on this particular property. " CRN:maPZ-58-84 (Nelson) S 1 ! i i PZ-46-84 PROPOSED=ORDINANCE NO, 330 PROPOSED-REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE Q a 3 111Viri 1-77N6_"Pi5Az 5_ 4 r------- -- -9; _ `ems ........ PUEBL = DEL -I IOL at t I i I4= k I 4 jI - i . ''`•211.t..',.'t ,. -.4r- . I r 3HAVEN HOLLOW i I ENCHANT EJ_ I --' I ACRES I 1 I Q ' UNIT-II I I i 9 I z �.. i-- ------ It 1 I TH i I .e"tur+mre�.e,....e:s<:c� x sit ' II CR-3 I . I -"'"' Ii L HAVEN HOLLOW ..,/, 1 .1 ,.. 1 1, zol 1 . 1 1( VM'�-2 ir___,„ It . i ! eN I 3 1IC.- 11 I CB � 1 R III CI-iD�NaIIt CB-2 1 �__,__;_ i II 1 11: [ iI I _ - -- - � .c el fw ,em , p„., .. ,i R J 'YN +6Cr ,._eP, . . y= •. ,- ..'. ''`Vr ' - �dL .= $n}*.; •vR r vn-Wwaa F. 1 f _ 1 a SUBJECT SITE N SCALE 1"=300' dis...;_ I LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) r i_- I t ORDINANCE NO 310 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-46-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL /^ The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as: Parcel No. 1: The north 200 feet of that part of the Northwest ; of Section 19, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, described as follows Beginning at a point 600 feet west of the southwest corner of the Northwest a of Section 19, thence west 900 feet on the south line of the Northwest *, thence north parallel to the east line of the Northwest I, a distance of 650 feet, thence east parallel to the south line of the Northwest ; 900 feet, thence south parallel to the east line of the Northwest ; 650 feet to the point of beginning, EXCEPT the east 200 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion of said land included within the right-of-way of Highway 60-70-80-89 Parcel No. 2 The north 200 feet of part of the Northwest a of Section 19, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, described as follows. The north 210 feet of the east 200 feet of the following property Beginning at a point 600 feet west of the southeast corner of the Northwest ; of Section 19, thence west 900 feet on the south line of the Northwest a, thence north parallel to the east line of the Northwest 1, a distance of 650 feet; thence east parallel to the south line of the Northwest a 900 feet, thence south parallel eIN to the east line of the Northwest ',- 650 feet to the point of beginning, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Ask Wendell J Clarke Mayor ,011\ ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av lex d City Attorney I ORDINANCE NO 310 PAGE TWO OF TWO r-_ r PZ-46-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 310 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ___I �\ ix C. 2 3 3 x w w Q > > J PUEBLgkT DEL wSOL W, CODY ST.0 I (-1, I I I W.VIRGINIA ST. I W. VIRGINIA ST I HAVEN HOLLOW I = ENCHANTED I a) ACRES I cc W SCENIC I a ca UNIT II I W, CACTUS SC) I } - - z TH I '" cal W' CACTUS WRFN ST. w I a. cc I - CR-3 3 z HAVEN HOLLOW W. GRFGCIRY T, I W. GREGORY ST T, 4 Q L I I - I �L__ z I I/ I I� J- IF----, 'Il — I -1 ' CB-2 Li --= o� CI-i I1 CB-2 I I II I 1 II ------ 1--- -- -- _JL_---_— --' APACHE TRAIL I '% SUBJECT SITE AT SCALE i"=300' 1 , LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) 1- C! ITEM NO. 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 310 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 316 PZ-50-84 THE APPLICANT IS SELTZER 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING .�. COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED Asub. Ink (IS) ACHE✓o n� O „tlr Z -9RizO0- 2ty o� 4ache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1984 Approver for Agenda Date Item # MEMORANDUM THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading Second Reading THROUGH: )4, MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER ice'Public Hearing Old Business FROM: CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business 1 SUBJECT: I�' REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM Consent Agenda PZ-50-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 316) OCTOBER 16, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING NOVEMBER 6, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Morton Seltzer (Randall Industries) REQUESTED REZONING: CR-1 Single Residence to CR-4/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development. SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: The northwest corner of East 16th Avenue and South Winchester Road in Section 28. SUBJECT SITE SIZE: Approximately 9 acres net, 10 acres gross. PRESENT USE: Undeveloped. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential : Low Density-Conventional Housing Only (less than 8 persons per acre). However, at the time of filing of PZ-32-83, which was basically the same project with a slightly higher density, the General Plan designation was Residential : Medium Density (8-20 persons per acre) . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: North and west of the subject site is CR-1 zoning, with limited development at this time. To the east are multiple-family dwellings zoned CR-5/PD, and to the south is GR zoning developed with mobile homes on individual lots. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 ^ The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-50-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 316) September 26, 1984 Page Two PROJECT DESCRIPTION: As shown on the concept plan, the applicant proposes to develop a 68 unit townhome project (the applicant is concurrently proceeding with subdivision of the property). Lot sizes will average approximately 3,600 square feet and will utilize a zero lot line concept with attached single-story dwelling units. The letter of September 14, 1984 to the Planning Department and the concept plan provide the project details. In relationship to the base CR-4 district regulations, the zone permits one dwelling unit per 3,500 square feet. The following regulations would need to be relaxed, however: 1. 60' minimum lot width reduced to 36' . 2. 25' minimum front yard reduced to 10' . 3. 8' minimum side yard reduced to 0' . 4. 35' minimum rear yard reduced to 10' . Based on 2.3 persons per household, the project would result in a density of 15.6 persons per acre. CASE HISTORY• The following chronology of events pertain to PZ-32-83, the proposed CR-5/PD project for the site which contained 81 dwelling units: Date Action 8/18/83 Development Coordinating Committee - pre-preliminary Planned Development review of Quail Run. 9/23/83 Incomplete rezoning application filed. 11/22/83 Completed application for rezoning filed. 11/22/83 Planning and Zoning Commission recommends General Plan amendments to the City Council (subject property designation: Residential : Medium Density, Conventional Housing Only) . 12/13/83 Planning and Zoning Commission authorizes a public hearing to be held to consider by Commission Initiative a rezoning of subject property from CR-1 to CR-5/PD. The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-50-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 316) September 26, 1984 Page Three 12/20/83 City Council adoption of Resolution No. 83-62 (General Plan amendments). Subject property designation: Residential : Low Density, Conventional Housing Only. I1/19/84 DCC/Subdivision Committee meeting on PZ-32-83/SD-5-83. Preliminary plat approval of SD-5-83. Planned Development comments on project made by Planning Department. 2/14/84 Planning and Zoning Commission voted to continue public hearing on PZ-32-83 until 2/28/84. 2/28/84 Valid protest petitions to the proposed rezoning filed with the Planning Department. 2/28/84 Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219) to the City Council . 3/20/84 City Council public hearing and first reading for PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219). 5/1/84 City Council second reading and consideration of PZ-32-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 219). Rezoning denied. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the rezoning based on the concept plan and narrative submitted. The project was in compliance with the General Plan at the time of filing of the PZ-32-83 application. Both 16th Avenue rt. and Winchester Road can accomodate the anticipated traffic load. The wall and the single-story theme of the development will provide adequate buffering to the adjacent CR-1 zoning and ample recreational opportunity will be afforded the project residents within the project boundaries. Staff also feels that relaxing the setback standards of the CR-4 zone will result in a better project. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of September 25, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Vehon/Jorgensen 5-2-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-50-84 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-50-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 316) September 26, 1984 Page Four also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 316, application of .-. Morton Seltzer of Randall Industries for his property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-4/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application, with the stipulation that the concept plan and narrative be substantially in compliance for preliminary and final Planned Development approval . The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. This particular rezoning is in compliance with all parts of Section 33.09 of the City of Apache Junction Ordinance. 2. Although this particular property is not at this time in compliance with the Land Use Map, this particular property is in compliance with the total General Plan of Apache Junction as pointed out earlier as it does try to provide for a mix of types of uses of housing and commercial and everything else in the City of Apache Junction and this project would provide some affordable single-family housing which at this time is not available in this area. 3. This particular rezoning would serve as an adequate and a good buffer between the low density areas to the north, west, and south of this project to the high density uses that are on the east and southeast of this particular piece of property." CRN:mas � r .)(\>anciaff ncluittc.E1, —Cc. P 0 Box 24635 Tempe, Arizona 85283 r;1 °" (602) 839-0173 3 September 14, 1984 SEP 17 1994 MR. CHARLES R. NEWCOMER QEPT OF PLANNING Director of Planning AND DEVELOPMENT CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 RE: SD-3-84/PZ-50-84 Dear Mr. Newcomer: As requested in connection with the above-referenced zoning matter the following material and information is herewith respectfully submitted: 1. Revised preliminary site-plan (15 copies). Please note that all dimensions are not drawn to scale but those are marked "NTS" to to denote "Not To Scale". 2. Limited Realty Report prepared by First American Title showing the property ownership by Randall Industries, Inc. . 3. Preliminary Drainage Report for Quail Run Townhomes prepared for this purpose by Wiley and Associates, Inc. , Surveyors & Engineers. Further, as general information, pleased be advised as follows: 1. All homes in the development will be single story. 2. All homes will be of frame and stucco construction with a variety of front roof trim treatments such as mission tile, wood shake and stucco parapet designs. Window and entry door styles will vary and garage doors will be different, all in the interest of creating an interesting and attractive community appearance when finished. 3. Landscaping is planned as lush and green with trees, shrubs, grass lawns and grass in most of the recreation and retention areas. 4. The main recreation area will include a swimming pool with open and covered furniture areas, kitchen and serving bar for community functions, picnic areas, practice golf putting greens, etc.. 5. The entire development will be enclosed (except the entry) with a six foot wall which will be made more interesting than usual along Sixteenth and Winchester Streets by use of one foot offset panels between each two sections to create in-set shrubbery planting areas on the outside and possibly some wrought iron at the retention and recreation sites on the corners to show off the landscaped interior. Along Sixteenth and Winchester Streets the walls will be either stucco or colored Block. Mr. Charles Newcomer -.k r J4 - Page Two; 6. All streets will have a minimum 28 foot width and four off-street parking spaces will be created for each unit by having a 20 foot set back with double driveway, one enclosed garage and one open carport. 7. Considering the increased street width to 28 feet, we are requesting set backs of 20 feet from the curb in front and 10 feet from the rear lot line. As this is to accomodate the planned 10 foot covered patios on most units we are actually requesting a 20 foot set back from the actual rear house line. It is also contemplated that though, at this time the preliminary plat submitted herewith shows some lots to be 36.33 feet wide, the final plat will be adjusted to show all lots as 36 feet wide. 8. A meeting with the Fire Department took place on 9-10-84, all of their requirements were satisfied and are reflected on the plat submitted herewith. Should you have any further questions or requirements at this time, please contact me at 839-0173 or Mr. Marty Jones at 252-7701. Sincerely, RANDALL IND SS IES, INC. // // --- orton "B d" Seltzer President Encl; cc: Marty Jones Wiley & Associates Robert Seltzer MS/cbk f PZ=50-84_ PROPOSED-ORDINANCE:NO. 316 I PROPOSED_REZQNL_FROM CR-1 SINGLERESIDENCE-TO CR-4/PD-MULZIPLE_RESIDENCE=BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT- Ffif4k-d... 1 I LLMITS OF ZQNING DISTRICT-(REMAINDER"GR GENERAL_RURALI ‘ [41 0�____ i 09;3104 11 t c?_t ii 1 C H ® i 129.11328 32Z+ 20 i ;(---7 I ate 'A<t�I331 332I3331 I i .--.2 t ` SUBJECT SITS �* CIS S t bill 1 .IC NI Elo I 15E t t _ t 4`•~`1' e,s 0 -..''' ` .:.++...' .ate* y,.•'y '�r..NfliVt1 .+�J 0- NO cp A Z:: ,'` 1 ii7go ?! 15 l o' 1 i nrli 11 Fi -1Vt -- -.awe 1 I C COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-04- n COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-03- t IV SCAL_. 1"=200' `` ---f- COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-26- 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL-NO. 102-05- nr ORDINANCE NO. 316 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-50-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-4/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ^ SECTION I IN GENERAL / l 1 The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as The Southeast 1 of the Southwest 1 of the Northwest 1 of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-4/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development. 2 The approval of the zoning district classification shall be construed as only concept approval for the base zoning and shall serve as official approval of the base zoning amendment to the Zoning Map. 3. Development of said property shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance. The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes, policies, guides, and detailed standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improvements 4 Applicant shall dedicate all rights-of-way and easements as required by the City prior to final plan approval. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this r , Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk v- APPROVED AS TO FORM Davi exaLl City Attorney raN ORDINANCE NO. 316 PAGE TWO OF TWO ,r., PZ-50-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 316 PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-4/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT r., [ j LIMITS OF ZONING DISTRICT (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL) ® i� 0311 12 CR-1 E. FRED AVE, ® ® *set r--- ----------� CD i coole6 CR-5/P1 ca E. FRIAR AVE, SUBJECT SITE 2 S® 0 I w I- iF- 15F ;. 1 * • )11. it' 0 • =1_ . I of 47 �� o �_--- --- a '— EAST 16TH AVENUE �11.Q.U.o_La. 0 0 0 0 0 11 13 12 R-1, 15 6 17 IE. KACHIi A AVE, QCOUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-04- 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-03- N SCALE: 1"=200' I I COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 102-26- 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 102-05- Air r. Amor ITEM NO. 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 316 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . Ink PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 317, PZ-51-84 . THE APPLICANT IS CRYE 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED PgA0HF 0 ti �) Z - -4 _ -- ;.--- AIR/ZONPil o �GLc�28 unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT October 1 , 1984 Approver for Agenda Date; Item -11 First Reading - MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Second Reading >Public Hearing THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER OId Business New Business FROM: " 'CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING • _Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-51-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 317) OCTOBER 16, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING NOVEMBER 6, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Mr. H. Dan Crye REQUESTED REZONING: GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: The southwest corner of East 5th Avenue and Royal Palm Road, approximately 300' north of U.S. 60 in Section 21 . .-. SUBJECT SITE SIZE: 14 acre (less roadway easements) PRESENT USE: Undeveloped GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential : Medium/High Density Opportunity and General Commercial Opportunity. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area along U.S. 60 is being converted to commercial uses, with this trend expected to continue. To the north of the subject site is a mobile home park and to the east is undeveloped GR zoning. REZONING IMPLICATIONS: Due to the existing and probable future development of the area and given the fact that Royal Palm Road is a mid-section line road, the conversion to commercial uses would probably not cause any severe negative impacts on the neighborhood. The applicant had stated his intention to file for abandonment of East 5th Avenue and Colt Road, but has not yet filed. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-51-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 317) October 1, 1984 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff has no objection to the proposed rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the General Plan and the neighborhood. Staff would recommend that the applicant dedicate to the City for public roadway and associated purposes the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject property site, and the north thirty-three feet (33' ) if East 5th Avenue is not abandoned. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ADDED STIPULATION A stipulation added by the Planning and Zoning Commission was that the north side of the subject property shall be fenced with proper screening from the residential area to the north. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of September 25, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion• (M/S Taylor/Heermans 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-51-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 317, application of H. Dan Crye for his property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. That the applicant dedicate to the City for public roadway and associated purposes, the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject site, and the north thirty-three feet (33' ) if East 5th Avenue is not abandoned. 2. The north side of the subject property shall be fenced with proper screening from the residential area to the north. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. The subject property is in a commercial opportunity zone, and this rezoning would be in substantial compliance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction. 2. It is probably the best use of the property at this time. " CRN:mas a I i 1 PZ-51-BLI- PROPOSED-ORDINANCE NO. 317 4 I PROPOSED-REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2_GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE I It6usi7779_ haads_ S,v PtRiSiar 7 - 1 1 I 1 II --? ' 1 ca_ EAST-5TK AVENUE j -1- 1 r . , , ' 1 .„.-1- CB-2 I 4.iL 1 COtit. A ._.' CB-2 i 3,..11 TH I X� . u N DeV., - I I I1 41 r � � 4 '- CB-2 I ^ � "� vT ,I I 1 I A,.I II II �� ii I I 1I . ^ ;`1 Ir VII*i 117, i-..1 1 y ''. -_�I re, 3 f { ti SUBJECT SITE N JCALE. 1" = 200' `_ L_r LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS C:NERAL RURAL) arrnir ORDINANCE NO. 317 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-51-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The East # of the East of the South 1 of the Northeast of the Southeast ; of the Southwest ; of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate to the City for public roadway and associated purposes the east forty feet (40') of the subject site, and the north thirty-three feet (33') if East 5th Avenue is not abandoned. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 a Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• Qavi Alexander City Attorney PZ-51-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 317 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE - I EAST 4TH VFNI F 1 Q EAST 5TH AVENUE I I "1 i I I -1 CB-2 I Q I 1 Q •I I o I !_______--I Ar, CB-2 Q I TH } I 0 .= I = 1 `, = I o I CB-2 I m I I 1 I II 1 I jI 1 1 11 1 I 11 0 1 II 1 B_- `� II I EI-c8 071�4T777VEN UL 1 i il -#r SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 200' L_J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 IITEM # 1MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR 1 COUNCILMAN HILL VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO _MAYOR_C LARKF UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL NI Amok .1w ITEM NO . 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 317 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCF NO. 307, AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE r► 2. THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY Cl ERK 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC . psACHE d I O V 1 z r r '1R1zOWP COit y o ace unction October 9, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER `- , FROM: CITY CLERK YL SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 307 -- AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE (LIQUOR LICENSES) Proposed Ordinance No. 307 was originally presented to the Council at the regular meeting of August 7, 1984, and again at the meeting of September 4, 1984. On both occasions, the public hearing on the ordinance was postponed until a future date. The attached ordinance is what was originally presented to the Council on August 7th. The proposed changes are as outlined on the attached memo. The Council may wish to adopt the original ordinance or give direction the draft a new ordinance with other changes recommended for liquor Aim, license fees. This item will appear on the October 16th agenda for you action. In order to make the ordinance immediately operation, it has been written with the emergency clause. kmc Approver for Agenda tee Date Item # First Reading ./( ; Second Reading -Public Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 /,:C r '5 '* 4, '''' ' ) \ 14-:,„ .i_'_,.!,-;- i V ii 2./ Oro ,:-_,----4 pache -7-zt -nctoon August 1 , 1984 ( /...... MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL %);'? THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ` '' ;y FROM: CITY CLERKW SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 307---AMENDING THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO LIQUOR LICENSE FEES Proposed Ordinance No. 307 has been drafted in accordance with a request to amend the liquor license fee schedule. The ordinance, as written, proposes to make two changes in this particular fee schedule: A. Establishes a non-refundable liquor license application fee of $50.00 which shall be paid prior to the City Council hearing on the license. This fee will help offset the administrative costs involved in processing such an application. At present, there is no such application fee charged by the city. B. Amends the renewal fees for liquor licenses based on the nature of the business. At present, the annual renewal fee is $35.00. This ordinance proposes to charge an annual renewal fee of 25% of the initial fee plus the usual $35.00 license fee. The A..... initial license fees will remain as they have been. These changes have been recommended by Vice Mayor Eidson and will appear on the August 7th council agenda with the emergency clause. Please contact either Vice Mayor Eidson or myself if you have any questions regarding these proposed amendments. Approver for Agenda `- Date/ Item # First Reading S/7/Z/ i' kmc Second Reading --1‘-Public Hearing — Old Business - New Business - Consent Agenda 001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 �(71yA HF✓G 1 1, Oz pJ -41RIZONP tlJzty o pache C unction October 16, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK a! SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 307, AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE Attached is Ordinance No. 307, amending Chapter 8 of the City Code pertaining to liquor license fees with the revisions discussed at the Work Session on October 15. lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE;UNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 f-Ir ORDINANCE NO. 307 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS, ARTICLE 8-5 BUSINESS OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX, SECTION 8-5-4 SCHEDULE, PERTAINING TO DEALERS IN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I IN GENERAL That Article 8-5 BUSINESS OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX, Section 8-5-4 Schedule, pertaining to dealers in alcoholic beverages, be amended to read as follows Section 8-5-4 Schedule ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, DEALERS IN• All dealers in alcoholic beverages shall submit a $50 00 non-refundable application fee to the City of Apache Junction prior to the City Council public hearing on the state liquor license application. This fee shall apply to all new, owner-transfer, person-transfer and location-transfer applications The annual renewal fee for all dealers in alcoholic beverages shall be charged at the rate of ten percent (10%) of the initial fee in addition to the annual business occupational license tax fee of $35 00 The fee schedule for dealers in alcoholic beverages shall be as follows: Type of License Initial Fee Renewal Fee Distiller's License (Series 1) 225 00 57 50 Brewer's License (Series 2) 225.00 57 50 Winer's License (Series 3) 225 00 57 50 Hotel-motel license to sell all spirituous liquors by individual portions and in the original containers (Series 15) 450.00 80 00 Hotel-motel retailer's license to sell all spirituous liquors 450 00 80 00 Hotel-motel license to sell beer and wine by individual portions and in the original containers 150.00 50.00 Hotel-motel license to sell beer by individual portions and in the original containers 112 50 46 25 On-sale retailer's license to sell all spirituous liquors by individual portions and in the original containers (Series 4) 300 00 65 00 On-sale retailer's license to sell beer and wine by individual portions and in the original containers (Series 7) 150 00 50 00 Ordinance No. 307 Page One of Three •--s Amok, Amik, On-sale retailer's license to sell beer by individual portions and in the original containers (Series 8) 112.50 46.25 Off-sale retailer's license to sell all spirituous liquors (Series 9) 112.50 46.25 Off-sale retailer's license to sell beer and wine (Series 10) 112.50 46 25 Off-sale retailer's license to sell beer (Series 11) 75.00 42 50 ,11\ Club license to sell all spirituous liquors (Series 14) 75 00 42 50 Restaurant-retailer's license to sell all spirituous liquors (Series 16) 450 00 80 00 SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1984 /Iw\ Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk Ordinance No 307 Page Two of Three wiTtor APPROVED AS TO FORM. eIN Nocc- 0 .?4,4,,e Davia\F. Alexande City Attorney 0.144 I Ordinance No 307 Page Three of Three ORDINANCE NO 307 t-id))) AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS, 1V\ ARTICLE 8-5 BUSINESS OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX, 16\)) r \ SECTION 8-5-4 SCHEDULE, PERTAINING TO DEALERS IN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING r PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY :E IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE f?)/ .)\.d) S JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That 'rticle 8-5 BUSINESS OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX, Section 8-5-4 Schedule, per .ining to dealers in alcoholic beverages, be amended to read as follows. Section 8-5-4 Schedule ALCOHOLIC BEVERAG DEALERS IN All dealers in alco •lic beverages shall submit a $50 00 non-refundable application fee to t - City of Apache Junction prior to the City Council public hearing on the state liquor license application. This fee shall apply to all new, owne -transfer, person-transfer and location-transfer applications The annual renewal fee fe all dealers in alcoholic beverages shall be charged at the rate of tw.nty-five percent (25%) of the initial fee in addition to annual busines occupational license tax fee of $35 00 The fee schedule for dealers in alcoholic beverages shall be as follows: Type of License Initial Fee Renewal Fee Distiller's License (Series 1) 225.00 91 25 Brewer's License (Series 2) 225 00 91.25 Winer's License (Series 3) 225.00 91 25 Hotel-motel license to sell all spi ituous liquors by individual portions and the original containers (Series 15) 450.00 147 50 Hotel-motel retailer's license to sel all spirituous liquors 450.00 147.50 Hotel-motel license to sell beer and win- by individual portions and in the original containers 150.00 72.50 Hotel-motel license to sell beer by individ al portions and in the original containers 112 50 63.12 On-sale retainer's license to sell all spiri ous liquors by individual portions and in the original containers (Series 4) 300 00 110.00 On-sale retailer's license to sell beer and win_ by individual portions and in the original containers (Series 7) 150.00 72.50 Ordinance No 307 Page One of Three � �\ �-I i On-sale retailer's license to sell beer by / individual portaions and In the original containers (Series 8) 112 5j 63 12 Off-sale retailer's license to sell all spirituous liquors (Series 9) 112 50 63 12 Off-sale retailer's license to sell beer and wine (Series 10) 112.50 63.12 Off-sale retailer's license to sell beer 'aft\ (Series 11) 75.00 53.75 Club license to sell all spirituous liquors (Series 14) 75 00 53.75 Restaurant-retailer's license to sell all spirituous liquors (Series 16) 450 00 147.50 SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLCITING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1984. if Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk Ordinance No 307 Page Two of Three ws Amok Amok APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney IT Ordinance No 307 Page Three of Three Amok Am\ /0, . rx v0 it--.! :-U fV , r,...;* i Z t\ -fi r Gr`% 4./ \ .r Y '41;?1Z0_ ( ity q .c:";1 CIPac,/ie (c:-.7-7..cnczwn August 8, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE FEES As requested at the Council work session of August 6th, the attached chart outlines the various revenues which the city would receive based on increases of liquor license fees in increments of 10%, 15%, 20% and 25%. As indicated by the chart, any increase in the renewal fee would mean a considerable increase in revenue for the city while still being a relatively small additional cost to the business. This chart does not take into consideration any proposed application fee which would only apply to those new businesses and any transfers of ownership or location. This item will be placed on the August 20th work session agenda for �. discussion. kmc :O1 =,TH IDAHO • .PACHE!UNCT,CN A !ZCNA 65222 0190 • -ELEPHCNE(o02;982 8002 AUGUST 7, 1984 LIQUOR LICENSE INCREASE CHART SERIES LICENSES ORG.FEE 10% 15% 20% 25% 6 9 $300.00 $30 00 x 9 = $270 00 $45.00 x 9 = $405.00 $60 00 x 9 = $540.00 $75 00 x 9 = $675 00 7 11 $150.00 $15.00 x 11 =$165.00 $22 50 x 11= $247 50 $30.00 x 11= $330 00 $37.50 x 11= $412 50 8 2 $112 50 $11.25 x 2 = $ 22.50 $16 87 x 2 = $ 33 74 $22.50 x 2 = $ 45 00 $28.12 x 2 = $ 56 24 9 7 $112 50 $11 25 x 7 = $ 78 75 $16 87 x 7 = $118.09 $22 50 x 7 = $157 50 $28 12 x 7 = $197 05 10 4 $112.50 $11.25 x 4 = $ 45.00 $16 87 x 4 = $ 67 48 $22.50 x 4 = $ 90 00 $28.12 x 4 = $112 60 11 1 $ 75 00 $ 7.50 x 1 = $ 7.50 $11 25 x 1 = $ 11 25 $15.00 x 1 = $ 15 00 $18.75 x 1 = $ 18 75 16 3 $450 00 $45 00 x 3 = $135 00 $67.50 x 3 = $202.50 $90 00 x 3 = $270.00 $112 50 x 3= $337 50 37 $723.75 $1,085 56 $1,447 50 $1,809 64 _______ IF THE CITY CONTINUED CHARGING THE $35 00 FEE PLUS THE INCREASE IN PER- CENTAGE THE REVENUE WOULD INCREASE AS FOLLOWS. $35.00 x 37 BUSINESSES $2,018.75 $2,380 56 $2,742.50 $3,104 64 $35 00 x 37 LIQUOR BUSINESSES = $1,295 00 1 .ter 4=7— ITEM NO . 8 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 307 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . FIRST READING (Without the Emergency Clause ) ROL ALL VOTE SHEET NOTES v ITEM # iEETING OF jrly. r MOTION BY: `-- SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC I Lf"AT. DAMIAN0 `'EQ C}L41AN STEEL'S;444I /ICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ✓ COUNCILMAN III L L .MAYOR CLARKEvi UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET r\ NOTES A) 6)( " • \-16‘. / 0 ITEM # _ MEETING OF I 'MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC I LMAN TAYLOR 1/ COUNCILMAN HILLleeHichS1 ✓ I VICE_MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ • __MAYOR_CLARKF UNANI"^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED J ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 307 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 3 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 307 , BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 307 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY .-. AMENDING CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS , ARTICLE 8-5 BUSINESS OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX , SECTION 8-5-4 SCHEDULE , PERTAINING TO DEALERS IN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL ( With the Emergency Clause) ITEM NO . 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 307 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 307 , BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . .-. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND St 3 - CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 307 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS , ARTICLE 8-5 BUSINESS OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX , SECTION 8-5-4 SCHEDULE , PERTAINING TO DEALERS IN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED. FOR DENIAL ( With the Emergency Clause ) PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 325, AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE 2. THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY CLERK 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC . PQACHF✓G O4( #:2n � O V 4r$0.i ::` Z L. 'elRizoNPit pacheunction October 9, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO- HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL nn THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ' -7 FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 325 -- AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE ( APPLICATION OF SALES TAX TO ADVERTISING) Proposed Ordinance No. 325 has been drafted in order to bring the City Code into compliance with changes made at the State level during the 1984 Legislative Session. This ordinance amends Chapter 8 of the City Code by adding specific definitions pertaining to advertising and defining what forms of advertising are required to pay sales tax. The addition of Section 8-3-9 outlines the procedures for the collection of sales tax by the tax payer and its application to the city's collection program. This ordinance has been written with the emergency clause in order to make its application and enforcement effective immediately. This item will appear on the October 16th agenda for your action. kmc Approver for Agenda Date Item # First Reading T Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ORDINANCE NO. 325 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS, ARTICLE 8-3 TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX, SECTION 8-3-1 DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 8-3-3 IMPOSITION OF TAX-TAX SCHEDULE, AND BY ADDING SECTION 8-3-9 ASSIGNMENT OF COLLECTIONS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY ^ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I IN GENERAL That Chapter 8 BUSINESS, Article 8-3 TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX, Section 8-3-1 Definitions, be amended by adding the definitions of the terms "advertising", "local advertising", and "media" to read as follows A.1 "Advertising" means the business of delivering or disseminating information directly to the public or any portion of the public for another party for consideration by media doing business in the city. K.1. "Local Advertising" means all advertising except a The advertising of a product or service which is sold or provided both within or without this state, and in which the advertisement names either no commonly designated business entity in this state or more than one commonly designated business entity in this state For the pur- pose of this paragraph, "commonly designated business entity" means a person or persons selling or providing any product or service to its customers under a common business name or style, even though there may be more than one legal entity conducting business functions using the same or substantially the same business name or style by virtue of a franchise, license or similar agreement b The advertising of a facility or of a service or activity in which neither the facility nor a business site carrying on such service or activity is located in this state c The advertising of a product which may only be purchased directly from an out-of-state business entity not main- taining a place of business in the state. d. Political advertising for United States presidential and vice-presidential candidates only e Advertising by means of product purchase coupons redeemable at any retail establishment carrying the product but not product coupons redeemable only at a single commonly designated business entity f. Advertising transportation services if a substantial portion of the transportation activity of the business entity advertised involves interstate or foreign carriage. 1.2. "Media" means persons or business entities disseminating advertising to the public for compensation, being the intended taxpayer under this article. Media includes newspapers, billboard companies, television or radio stations, handbill mailers or distributors, and similar entities ORDINANCE NO 325 PAGE ONE OF THREE ^ ^ That Section 8-3-3 Imposition of Tax - Tax Schedule, be amended by providing that tax on advertising shall apply to local advertising as follows 5. Publication of newspapers, magazines or other periodicals and publications, when published within the city, including the gross income derived from subscriptions sold within the city and from local advertising and notices Subscriptions sold within the city for newspapers, magazines and other periodicals and publications published without the city shall also be taxable under this section, and local advertising sold within the city shall likewise be taxable 6 Job printing, engraving, embossing and copying, local adver- tising by billboards, direct mail, radio, television or by any means calculated to appeal to prospective purchasers or users That Section 8-3-9 Assignment of Collections be added to read as follows Section 8-3-9 Assignment of Collections A. Subject to Subsection B of this Section, if a taxpayer liable for the tax imposed under Section 8-3-3 has a legally enforceable agreement requiring an advertiser to reimburse the taxpayer for the tax imposed under such section and reimbursement is not made within ninety days of the billing by the taxpayer to the adver- tiser for the advertising, the taxpayer may notify the tax collector to request assignment for enforcement of the collection of the tax reimbursement to the tax collector. On acceptance of the assignment by the tax collector, the taxpayer's liability for payment of the tax amount is suspended until reimbursement is made or the agreement between the taxpayer and the advertiser is determined not to be legally enforceable or collectible B. The assignment for enforcement of the collection of tax reimburse- ment shall be accepted thirty days after receipt of the request by the tax collector if the taxpayer documents to the satisfaction of the tax collector that a reasonable and diligent effort has been made to collect the tax reimbursement. ^ SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV DECLARING AN EMERGENCY It being necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety >� of the City of Apache Junction that this ordinance become effective immedi- ately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption ORDINANCE NO. 325 PAGE TWO OF THREE ANN s PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1984. WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney I L ORDINANCE NO 325 PAGE THREE OF THREE oak C— ITEM ND. 9 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 325 , BY TITLE FOR THE FIRST READING . FIRST READING (Without the Emergency Clause ) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES rit)1 )/YPNd \ \ ITEM If MEETING OF 07 / w MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 116)1ThA-� ABSTAINED M:. I: ANO ILMAN NTLL I - ^ IL1AIL TAYLOR IIIMMINEMEI i.� /liri. "Arm IC.F MAYOR EIDSON 11101111.1111111 1' isaag►y ,; MAYOR CLARKE UNANIrIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE0) SHEET NOTES 0.,,,,,/ ,,,,,,,,),,,: ..._ 41.) -' Icy ITEM # 1 MEETING 0 /. I ifj MOTION BY: 02 SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED . S _c 0u NCILMAN HILL COUNG I U^AM TAYLOR V N D v COUNCILMP AMIANO \DICE MAYOR EIDSON V . MAYOR CLARKE ✓ UNAN !^.OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 325 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 325 , BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 325 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE , CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS , ARTICLE 8-3 TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX , SECTION 8-3-1 DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 8-3-3 IMPOSITION OF TAX-TAX SCHEDULE , AND BY ADDING SECTION 8-3-9 ASSIGNMENT OF COLLECTIONS ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL ( With the Emergency Clause ) ITEM NO. 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 325 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE. This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 325 , BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND 'd-. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 325 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE , CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS , ARTICLE 8-3 TRANSACTION PRIVILEGE TAX , SECTION 8-3-1 DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 8-3-3 IMPOSITION OF TAX-TAX SCHEDULE , AND BY ADDING SECTION 8-3-9 ASSIGNMENT OF COLLECTIONS ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL (With the Emergency Clause ) PUBLIC HEARING C 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR APPI CTATTON FOR SMALL GAME ELNGO LICENSF THE APPLICANT IS SIINRTSF R.V. RESORT 2. IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME, 3, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, PpACHF 4 O 0. U Q gRI2ONP �Di�1� o� pacheunction October 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK / SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUNRISE R.V. RESORT Attached is an application for a Small Game Bingo License, submitted by Ms Julie E. Meiier, agent for Sunrise R.V. Resort, 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction. Pursuant to Title V, Chapter 4, Article 2, of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the City Council shall hold public hearing and recommend approval or disapproval of the appli- cation to the licensing authority, Arizona Department of Revenue. I have attached responses from the Department of Public Safety and the Apache Junction Fire Department, revealing their recommen- dations. If you have any questions, please let me know. lvc Approver for Agenda_ Date Item # First Reading , Second Reading ✓ Public Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 p PQp,CHF G / DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY z qP/ZONP ii o ache &unction W E Mc DANIEL Director /03/4, October 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly FROM: Director of Public Safety J William E. McDaniel SUBJECT: Application for Bingo License Sunrise R.V. Resort Attached you will find the Apache Junction Fire Departments Final Inspection Report for the Sunrise R.V. Resort located at 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction, Arizona. At this time the Department of Public Safety can find no reason to deny the application for bingo license as the Sunrise R.V. Resort has complied with any changes requested by the Apache Junction Fire Department. WEM/aes 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 r. ii PQp.CHF✓G O c Yt 0 • O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY U r q4 Z '1 P/ZONP ic 'ity o L ipac`Le cunction W E McDANIEL D rector October 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly FROM: Director of Public Safety , ,A+N William E. McDaniel SUBJECT: Application for Bingo LIcense Sunrise R.V. Resort Upon making the necessary investigation, this department can find no reason to deny the application for bingo license to Sunrise R.V. Resort located at 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction, Arizona. However, the Apache Junction Fire Department came across a few items which need to be ammended before the bingo license can be issued. These items should be corrected by next week. The Fire Department will then make another investigation and aprise the Police Department of the results. At that time we will pass the findings along to you for the final approval. WEM/aes 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 _ ,.. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE .M BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 BINGO LICENSE NO. AFFIDAVIT FOR CALLERS AND ASSISTANTS TO CALLERS MichaeJ.. E. Trainer , being of lawful age, upon his/her oath deposes that he/she is a member or new member of : Sunrise R.V. Resort and is of good moral character and has not been convicted of a felony. He/ further deposes that being a volunteer, no commission, salary, compensation, reward or recompense of any kind, either directly or indirectly , will be accepted for calling or assisting the caller in the conduct of any game of Bingo. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this /Y. day of S , 19 my Commission Expires June 14 My Commission Expires June 14, 1987 -,,4 otary Pu-bslic r , . CALLERS OR ASSISTANTS PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE: `' �'+ `� Name:Michael E. Trainer Address: 1982 W. Broadway NOTE: This is not a Responsible City, Zip:Apache Jct. , Az. 85220 Party Affidavit . SBG-1-D (DOR-440) ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE I 4111 BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY I. 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 AFFIDAVIT FOR PESPCNSIBLE PARTY BINGO LICENSE NO. STATE OF ARIZONA 1 i SS COUNTY OF pinal I Julie E. Meiier ,beingof lawful age upon his oath deposes and says that he will be responsible for the holding, operation and conduct of such Games of Bingo in accordance with the terms of the license and the provisions of Title 5,Chapter 4,Article 2, A R.S L ( __ l / (. e ifs ( rti isig'atu,a Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 S7 day of S/� 7-/,-z- /c < 19 7 My commission Expires June 14, 1987 My commission expires 62.../20.„), (6 ,!,:,4%,..7,___ Signature of fYotsry Public ' �`t ,' ) J 1 Please Print or Type i/I, )0 ,, , Julie E. Meiier , .„- ,l Member's Name ,'. . )')„k\'', %' ' Address 1403 W. Broadway Rd. #38 _ ' " City, State, Zip Apache Jct. Az. 85220 Telephone 983-2500 sec 1 • (DOR-406) ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85007 APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE Check One New Licensel Renewal C This application must be filed and Bingo License issued before you may lawfully conduct games of Bingo Any license issued pursuant to application and approval shall be non-transferable and shall be renewed at the beginning of each calendar year Approved Disapproved OFFICE USE ONLY DATE ISSUED YEAR OF LICENSE LICENSE NUMBER 1 Name of Applicant Sunrise R. V. Resort 2 Address 1403 W. Broadway Rd_ Apache Junction, Az- 85220 3 Mailing address if different from above Ramp 4. Have you(the s(gnator)ever been convicted of a felony? No 5. Have you(the signator)ever been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude? No 6 Does applicant hold a liquor license? No If so,what type? 7 Place or places where Bingo Games will be held 1403 W. Broadway Rd. Apache Junction ARIZONA str«u (city) AR IZONA (Street) (City) ARIZONA (sn«t( (City) 8 Days of Week Games to be held Tuesday (D.v) TIME AM 6:30P.M. 9:00 pM 9. Does applicant own premises where Bingo Games will be held? Yes If 'Yes" how long? 10 Have such premises been regularly used by the applicant? NO ( If"Yes',.hod long? il. , • 11 If such premises are rented terms of rental No IESSOR'.S P!AME ADDRESS 12. Designdteiiindividual who will have overall supervision and management of Bingo Games and will be responsible for holding, operating and conducting such games in accordance with the terms of the license and the provisions of the Law NAME Julie E. Meijer HOME ADDRESS 1403 W. Broadway Rd. #38 Apache Junction Az. PHONE 983-2500 BUSINESS ADDRESS 1403 W. Broadway Rd. Apache Junction, Az. PHONE 983-2500 13 Designate member who will be responsible for proper utilization of the entire net proceeds of any game in accordance with State Law and the filing of tax statements,if other than member listed in Question No 12 NAME HOME ADDRESS PHONE BUSINESS ADDRESS — -- PHONE SBG-1 (DOR-404) 14. Location of Books and Records on Bingo for Audit Purposes C.).- (City) (Su to) 15. The undersigned does hereby certify that the applicant is eligible for a license under Title 5 Chapter 4,Article 2,A R.S.,and that the entire net proceeds of any game shall be exclusively devoted to the charitable purposes of this licensee 16 The applicant hereby agrees that any license issuad hereunder shall be subject to restrictions and limitations imposed by Title 5 Chapter 4,Article 2,A.R.S.,and rules and regulations promulgated pursuant hereto in force and effect at date of issuance or thereafter adopted,enacted,or promulgated 17 The applicant hereby agrees to supply additional information and evidence in support of the statements and matters contr'"'" in this application upon request of the Arizona Department of Revenue ST/TE OF ARIZONA 1 ► SS COUNT'OF Pinal ► Sunrise R_ V. Resort ,being of lawful age upon his oath deposes and :ays that he is Julie E. Metier of the above named organization that he is fully anc duly authorized to sign and file the above application that he has read the foregoing application and knows the contents then of and,that all matters therein set forth are true of his own knowledge,and that he does hereby certify that no commission, salary compensation,reward or recompense will be paid to any person,firm,association corporation or other legal entity for holding, oper sting,conducting or assisting in a game or garnes of BINGO,eccept as otherwise provided by law xL Icy L'62- Slannure Subscribed and swtrn to before me this / day of i' /J 19 My commission exp,rew__ My Commtssron Expires Lane 14 t4R; Sipnetu re of •.y Pubhc • j 1 1,0;d ), r�)riiti Iiii. L ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES I , • I j i r, clj4 ITEM # I MEETING OF /D / c0 MOTION BY : SECONDED BY; ,..,Pb/741/ YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTDSON . _ I I INC ILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HT] L V _COUNCILMAN DAM IANO MAYOR CLARKE , UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED • 1 � TOTAL V ITEM NO . 10 .-. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE , SUBMITTED BY SUNRISE R . V . RESORT BE RECOMMENDED TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY FOR APPROVAL . FOR APPROVAL ram---- p p ITEM NO . 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE , SUBMITTED BY SUNRISE R . V . RESORT BE RECOMMENDED TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY FOR DENIAL . FOR DENIAL PUBLIC HEARING C I. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR APPLICATION FOR SERIES 7 LIQUOR I ICFNSE THE APPLICANT IS JR'S PIZZA 2. IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME. 3. ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON I THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. �QAOHE✓G O 204 O 1U 44)/Z0141"‘ ity on ✓ 7 ac/e c 2unction October 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK P/ SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT---APPLICATION FOR SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE, JR' S PIZZA In accordance with the procedures for processing applications for liquor licenses , notice was posted on the premises at 725 Apache Trail, Suite 47, Apache Junction , on the 25th day of September , 1984 , by the Deputy City Clerk . The notice re- mained posted for twenty (20) days , during which time written arguments in favor of or in opposition to the proposed li- cense were to be filed with the City Clerk. As of this date, there have been no objections addressed to the City on this matter . Correspondence was received from the Director of Public Safety and the Director of Public Works , a copy of which is attached . The next step in the procedure is for the .-. Council to hold a public hearing on the application and make recommendation for approval or disapproval to the State De- partment of Liquor Licenses and Control. Respectfully submitted, Kathleen Connelly Approver for Agenda City Clerk Date Item # First Reading Second Reading lvc F'ubtic Hearing - Cid Business - New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 Aft. ow ©�` PACHF✓e, ,„ , O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY U 1„;„ ,. Z q,pizONp. it opache unction W E McDANIEL Director .^k October 1 , 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk, Kathy Connelly FROM: Director of Public Safety 11)c w' William E. McDaniel SUBJECT: Liquor License Application, Series 7 Mr. Ernest L. Rubendall agent for JR's Pizza Upon investigation, this Department can find no reason to deny the Series 7 Liquor License to JR's Pizza, located at 725 Apache Trail Suite 47, Apache Junction, Arizona, whose agent is Ernest L. Rubendall. WEM/aes 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 PgACHE✓G ti 47—.( , f jz \\N„........._ 'qPiZONP' City O ,79ac/ e ZGi'LCtion September 26, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 7 , THROUGH: Xti, CITY MANAGER p/CITY CLERK FROM: V_ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ) SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE "JR' s PIZZA" No objection is expressed to the above referenced application. AiRbk RWB:sh Ref: 304.09 1C01 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 GI jjU ,e , ZJ N.:,n -'J'� `" Y. iZt1I O7 7' LLV1;2e , -fir ,�iliC(,..ICJ r�7 /'C .L L ./ ti f September 25 , 1984 NOTICE The attached application for a Series 7 Liquor License, by Ernest L. Rubendall, agent for JR' s Pizza, 725 Apache Trail , Suite 47 , Apache Junction, Arizona, was posted by the Deputy City Clerk on the 25th day of September , 1984, at 3 : 00 p.m. . Any person who is a bona fide resident of the age of nineteen ( 19) years or more , residing , owning or leasing property within one half (1/2) mile radius from the proposed premises to be licensed , may file written arguments in favor thereof , or objections thereto with the City Clerk at City Hall within twenty (20) days after the date of posting . No arguments for , nor against , shall be filed thereafter . A public hearing will be held Tuesday , October 16 , 1984 , at the City Council Chambers , 1001 North Idaho Road , Apache Junction, Arizona, at 7:00 p.m. , at which time any objections filed will be heard . . • , ; i Kathleen Connelly ; , ; " City Clerk lvc Attachments 001 NORTH IDAHO a APACHE;UNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 Ask STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Date of Posting: September 25, 1984 Applicant: Mr. Ernest L Rubendall -� agent for Jr's Pizza Address of Premises: 725 Apache Trail , Suite 47 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 License(s) Applied for: Series 7 Liquor License I hereby certify that pursuant to Section 4-201, A.R.S., I did post notice in a conspicuous place on the premises concerning the above liquor license(s) and said notice shall remain posted for a period of at least 20 consecutive days. Signature of City/County Clerk or Representative: 74, 4 1 .> 1_,/ i ( I Dated: / (/' CC/ r i - Return this affidavit with your recommendation and any related petitions to: Department of Liquor Licenses and Control 1645 West Jefferson, Suite 227 Phoenix, AZ 85007 *For text of Section 4-201, A.R.S., please see reverse. REV 8/81 FORM 128 • • 20 REV M""ia —D L L C USE ONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR I ICENSES AND(ONTROL 1645 WEST JEFFERSON SUITE 227 PHOENIX,A7 85007 602/255 5141 3:n I . .,, ir Il 3 APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE Type or print with black ink NOTE PROCESSING OF MOST APPLICATIONS TAKES 60 DAYS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OFTEN RESULT IN A LONGER WAITING PERIOD THEREFORE YOU ARE CAUTIONED REGARDING EXTENSIVE I-INANt IAL LOMMITMCN TS.PLANS FOR A GRAND OPENING ETC BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF THE LICENSE es SECTION�IO 1 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A ATTACH A XEROX COPY OF CHECK M 0 ETC Gr NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 a 14 15 Hevtewel by-_ accepted by 0 PERSON TRANSFER Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 9 14 15 Current tile hanged by ❑ LOCATION TRANSFER Complete Sections 2 3 4 a 10 14 15 Copies made for posting by �/ 'u NEW AGENT FOR CORP OR CLUB Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 11.14 15 Copies mailed for posting by Datev'( CIPROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 12,14 15(tee not required) Copies tor background by Datee� ❑GOVERNMENT LICENSE Complete.Sections 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Comments SECTIOAL3, TYPE OF OWNERSHIP10 V/.///� gi 141NDIV}t)UAL,Complete Section 7 (-)CLUB Complete Section 8 CLAM" T R • T H DATE COOS AN, 1` J2ALPA9TNERSHIP,Complete Section 7 0 GOVERNMENT \ �cf"CORPORATION Complete Section 8 0 OTHER explain (ei cc-e- SECTION 3 APPLICANT•(All applicants must co 1 APPLICANT'S OR AGENT'S NAME �4,,e 71(/)4e Z- /-, '/Ve-%/ I. (Insert one name only-to appear on License) Last Name 1 First Name Middle 2 CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP NAME " — Enter exact name as it appears on Articles of Inc or Partnership Agreement 3 BUSINESS NAME: ✓ A,? ' 'S "/2- 2—Al 7 Enter exact name as it appears on the exterior of premises/, ,4 BUSINESS ADDRESS �� // �/C,'e; 7�r//// Do not use P O Box Number/ y^ 5 CITY /'/�1/'/l c/re- �U�( ��'/4l COUNTY. / v% v Al 4 ZIP CODE 7 Zs II MAILING ADDRESS (7 7 '' ,-÷71)(-C«0/2)1 CITY /1 >A STATE /72 ZIP CODE. 2" 7 IS THE BUSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OF THE ABOVE CITY OR TOWN EYES C]NO SECTION 4 INDICATE LICENSE SERIES.Check only one use sop form for each license NEW LICENSE FEES e Total Duo if Filed Total Due if Filed Person to Person Locate SERIES Nov 1 May 15 May 16 Oct 31 Transfer Fee Annual Renewal Transfer ❑ 1 DISTILLERS LICENSE (IN STATE) 1,950 00 1 775 00 ~ 600 00 350 00 200 0 ❑ 2 BREWERS LICENSE (IN STATE) 1,950 00 1 775 00 600 00 350 00 200 OC ❑ 3 VINTNERS LICENSE (IN STATE) 1,750.00 1,675 00 400.00 150 00 200 OC ❑ 4 WHOLESALER ALL LIQUORS 1 850 00 i 1,725 00 600 00 250 00 200 0' ❑ 5 WHOLESALER, WINE AND BEER 1,700.00 i 1,650 00 300 00 100 00 200 0( ❑ 6 ON SALE RETAILER, ALL LIQUORS 1,750 00 I 1,675 00 400 00 150 00 200 0 X 7 ON-SALE RETAILER, WINE AND BEER 475 00 1437 50 250 00 75 00 200 Ur ❑ 8 ON-SALE RETAILER BEER 325 00 312 50 150 00 25 00 200 0! ❑ 9 OFF-SALE RETAILER ALL LIQUORS 1,150 00 l 1,125 00 200 00 50 00 200 0 ❑ 10 OFF-SALE RETAILER WINE AND BEER 450 00 425 00 200 00 50 00 200 0 ❑ 11 OFF-SALE RETAILER BEER 325 00 312 50 150 00 25 00 200 0 ❑ 12 RAILROAD TRAIN LICENSE 1,825 00 l 1,712 50 550 00 225 00 200 0 ❑ 13 AIRLINE LICENSE 1,825 00 I 1 712 50 550 00 225 00 200 0 ❑ 14 PRIVATE CLUB LICENSE 1 250 00 1 175 00 150 00 200.0 ❑ 15 HOTEL/MOTEL LICENSE, Complete Section 6 2 100 00 1 850 00 500 00 ❑ 16 RESTAURANT LICENSE, Complete Section 6 2 100 00 I 1 850 00 500 00 ❑ 21 GOVERNMENT LICENSE 300 00 250 00 100 00 'Not Permitted I 1 DLLC USE ONLY PI V ss FEES - - APP LIC FEE AGT CH4 1.1i4 t'LUU 'GI SECTION 6 QUESTIONS FOR ALL APPLICANTS 1 Do local zoning laws permit the vile of alcs1holic beverages at the location you seek to license EKES .O 2 Distance to the nearest church . }.'UL�: Nomeladdress of church._ 3 Distance to the neatest sch of. - )7:-µ-t' Name/address of school r� 4 Are you the [DOWNERI LESSEE ['SUBLESSEE ❑PURCHASER of the premises 11'c'r ✓ /�"ti 5 If the premises is leased,give name and address of lessor .rr-T"Y-` G4.: / _ �/ • (,/ ✓ 4v /, 7,`i //;///7>A, ,tit %!• Iry<<11_,_ e_ .J,OL // • )i//Address NU r- f sty r u. r- Ztp 6 What date was leaseisubfease signed. 7'%._/GYl J /%;"2. Term ni lease is - __ye.,.s 7 Does the lease include provision to retranster the liquor license back to the lessor at termination 1 iYES ,!:O 8. Has a license or transfer of license for the premises represented herein been denied by the State within the past sixty m•.,nrhs ,_'YES LfVO If yes attach an explanation 74Y= cJ cCA/ 9 Who Mill manage this business. 1t✓!;L `C (.-' f=/c'^�y. / __ .. I` 4.v;.-j,sn,49}jaamt_ / :;.fir nst Alarm Middle Each manager,other than ownerls) must complete Form 134 and submit an 'applicant fingerprint card 10 Does any alcoholic beverage manuhacturer wholesaler or employee thereof have any interest in your business _V E5 j./%0 11 Is the premises licensed with a license other than the one for which you are applying cell ES I:.10 11 so .iv,I,cen-:e'Jo //1 „�7i Ilcensee'lexactly as aappears on License) 4 Last Name / First NairnMiddle ' 12 What is your Arizona State Sales Tax(Privilege)License No 1 ► — 0( . g 13 Do you understand that a portion of the fees such as Application Fee 1550.001 and Interim Permit Fee Id anoricablel truer letundable OYES ❑r' -r C7-77 `SECTION 6 FQ,SERIES 15 OR 16 APPLICANTS. 1 Is there a Gelid Series 15 or 16 license currently issued it the proposed location.OYES 0 NO If so enter licensees name exactly as it appears on lic Lo.ense N'1 / / / / J Last Name First Name Middle NOTE If the answer to question 1 above is 'yes' you miry qualify for an Interim Permit to nc r de while your appl¢tdlon is pending consult Section 4-203.01 A.R S. complete a Form 176 attach 'appropriate fee attach the current Ircerse and su.anst with this app„cation. 2 What Aercentegd of your gross sales represents the purchase of 'meals" % 3 How much of your floor space is designed for restaurant dining(see ft) Seating capacity for dining purposes 4 Have you attached a copy of your menu that includes prices OYES ONO (If not explain) SECTION 7 INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP OWNERS • 1 Answer the following questions (If applicants are married answer each question for both husband and wife) Percentage Owned Last Name First Name Middle by each person Residence Address City State /c:/oe--7VDyLG .� 1g :�rsG- `-%sit/ 9'-1 �7k wooj) Applicant tenter here and in section 3/ if`;Z. ' 4 5A1 Partner for Spouse) //-1-7iN /sez //JCC 50070 Partner Partner Attach additional sheet if necessary EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AN9 AN'APPLICANT' TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD 2 Is each person listed above a bona fide resident of Arizona ES ONO 3 Is any person other than the above going to share in the profits/lasses of the business OYES JO SECTION 8 COAA/ ATION OR CLUB APPLICANTS 1 Name of corporation or club (Enter exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc or Club Charter) 2. Date incorporated or chartered State where incorporated • 3 Arizona Corporation Commission File No Date authorized to do business in Arizona 4 Is corporation or club nonprofit LIVES LINO If so gore I R S tax exempt Nn 5. It a club refer to Section 4 101 4 A R S. and enter the subparagraph under which you are'waiving • 6 List officers and directors Last Name First Name Middle Title Residence Address City State Attach additional sheet if necessary I List stockholders owning 10%or mine. EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND SUBMIT AN 'APPLICANT' TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD ILast Name First None Middle Percentage owned Residence Address City/State• -1•-- If this corp.is owned by another corn rta.:h in +wnership officer/director nisclbsole for the parent[Or t'UL,tiOn At Lich xfd.ronal sheets as necessary SECTION 14 DIAGRAM OF PREMISES(Diagram must be on this form blueprints not accepted) 1 SHOW ONLY THE AREA 10 ill ('OVERT-0 BY [HIS LICENSE INCLUDE ALL EN THAN(ES/EXITS DRIVE IN WINDOW', :.LRVII E SINII P. LIQUOR STORAGE AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OR:QUAKE FOOTAGE FIGURES DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS LIVING QII..R TER SERIES 15 AND SERIE l IS APPLII AN IS MUST EXPLICITLY KEPI(T KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND DINING F 1CILITIES N r�a� I 1., 1 — u 0�.) i _ M i t1 �� ); 4 ,• • — K;ieids-e, —r •( _. _—__ ____ __ _ I I-- — NI n_ iA (9),k 1 `no A. 2 Do you agree to nobly the Department of my chanties of boundaries entrances Cells or service windows prior to modification elYES r'NO 3 he above diagram,s the only:sea where Idcuholit.Inver gob am to be sold served consumed,dispensedpossessed or stored ignature of applicant/agent , SECTION 15 SIGNATURE BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS STATE OF ARIZONA 1 �y I ss COUNTY OF ,/'��HL !'_� ) I, .E/1/yl %% F A, fit A/eV'Li— 9— JE f7 iv' /C(1/;-Ai-)//• C— BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON O Printed Mane of Applicant (or Agent if Corp or Club) HEREBY DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT 111 I AM THE APPLICANT TOR A(,ENi APPLICANT IS A CORPORA[ION/CLUB) MAKING THE FOREGOING APPLICATION (2) THAT SAID APPLICATION HAS BEEN HEAD THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE I)) II' THIS APPLICATION IS NOT BEING MADE TO DEFRAUD OR INJURE ANY CREDITOR TAXING AUTHORITY REGULAIC AUTHORITY OR TRANSFEROR (4) THAT NO OTHER PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREIN HA., INTEREST IN THE SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WHICH THESE STATEMENTS ARE MADE (5) AND THAT NONE OF I OWNERS PARTNERS OFFICERS DIRECTORS OR STOCKHOLDERS LISTED HEREIN HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN i PAST FIVE YEARS OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION I&THE P S YE4I1' / / L.J.2)s.� (mac Ji-L 71/L�`�( ,_.cL.. .`�. ��4 J h( c — nature SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this \"Y — (1f)w�i`11 X" 14' l _SJpat[rre of N( 0 BC C (`t r. i srlrOr19 '1y Cennmisum ev pins oft [f/''.it./C s) �% , , .,I .v r J r y t .1 it 1 Aggabk .� �s • • vq AIM taew —DLLC USEONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 PHOENIX,AZ 85007 602/2555141 Er 1 . (1 f tf 14( • QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER PARTNER, STOCKHOLDER (10% OR MORE) AND MANAGER ALSO EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN "APPLICANT TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY • READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT I Name /\ '/_-3(__-=v V 1)/,^L. /V Date of birth .l/_—5 ..,5r Last First Middle Month day year / �7 �e 2 Business Name V�f /b ..—� Place of bath. /�f�&` /L) /' IAs it appears in Section 3 of Form 1201 City State 71 s GU / E T� i //-4l 3 Business adtlgis 1/',4C// /�,� C (Do not use P O Boa number) City County Zip Coda 4 Drivers license No' /�— -2 U/J 7 v Height L.C. C-' Weight. /..�V Eye color 4c" Hair color 644 y �• State 5 Name of spouse plc � / f' Uf✓' �L Date of birth / /r'4 First Middle Last Maiden ,I rcn 7 c 6 Of what state are you a bona tide resident J '\/ c—U v I I Arizona date of residency. /t 7 Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years I/unemployed part of the time so stole Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed or Business (Give Street Address.City State and Zip Coda) A DATES Present Position or business engaged to B DATES Position held or business engaged in immediately preceding above(Al C DATES Position held or business engaged in immediately preceding above IB) (AT Attach additional skeet if neeeaeery 8 Indicate where you have resided for the last five years FROM TO RESIDENCE Month Veer Month Year Street City State Zip Code Attach additional sheet if naeasgry rc 9 How many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto' -)L//^ //\ 10 Give Telephone Numbers for' ' —✓ . a Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detained cited ed indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor violations OYES L NO 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been fined imprisoned had sentence suspended or placed on probation for viobtron of a�law or ordinance OYES .ONO 13 Have you ever had a business professional or liquor licanle rpected darned revoked suspended or fined in this or any other state OYES s 3No 14 Have you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license relectad or denied OYES ONO 15 Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a ludarnent against you in any civil action, the tublsct of which involved fraud or misrepresentation of a liquor related matter. OYES 'ONO eN /'\ • CD \ FORM tars* —DLLC USEONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 ii ' ;EP 4 Ur i'li 1 u4 PHOENIX,AZ 85007 602/255 5141 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER PARTNER STOCKHOLDER (10% OR MORE) AND MANAGER ALSO, EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM ON MUST SUBMIT AN 'APPLICANT TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY / READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT \ N • <-: .1//, j I Name "'` -/o 6'2q '. --c- /E..�/t/e%`/ Date of birth p /Last / / First Middle Month day year 2 Business Name V1�. ' ' /22'I Place of birth. r/..\el a./S .,i(,(J/' (As it appears in Section 3 o1 Form 1201 City State 7 2^�" <4/ /j.J,}c//fc'- ,cce'/ ' /..:.,, ,-. _ ,C:;(t 77 x../ %%:,/�' f i Z.7. D 3 Business address /' / (Do not use V O Boa number) City County Zip Code a Drivers license No. '1" " -- - A 1 Height 7 Weight. /"..' Eye color.zike f Hair color'e'v"/ e State /�./ o ./�,s/ 5 Name of spouse '"`"'/V /!/LG:�C'/V Ll`� s L S, Date of birth 2/4 r-4,7 First Middle Last Maiden v 6 Of what slate are you a bona fide resident /,/'L If Arizona date of residency/% i 77 / Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the tune so state Time DescribeorBu Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed Business (Give S Address City State and Zip Code) A DATES (Z 7/! f`• _ L!/.f// '7A/' C>/jf STft774,S Present Position or business engaged �,., / / /� " /15e L//✓F //4 W e--,e ,c`, !n m (295///�� /��,' �.as s, v r ,4,..5 I B DATES U,q/e.-A//'C-d'/�U Position held or business engaged in 7t' /y/ //�774E/ _- immediately preceding above IA) / O /�- ,p C OATES _7cL 4Ir-/c_ — O/: -J' r{ 4-4,-4-- Position held or business engaged in / ` C./4/ '5 1 ' ',,4,'Ni l C / c /�/,.} immediately preceding above(Ell /,t) /. `'r/ /' ' '7 ,/ / , / ,1 , - // ' c Attach additional sheet if necessary 8 Indicate where you have resided for the last five years FROM TO RESIDENCE Month year Month Year Street City State I Zip Code CM IA�/'-/77y' /i("�_. /L 9 . )Gc ,i4)D0/) _ /t ,t 25--2o1"'" Attach additional sheet if necessary 9 How many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto L/ / -'5 -' -ef-Z- /r 7 10 Give Telephone Numbers for / _C / - - , I'/ ) Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detuned cited eel indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including / traffic violations and liquor violations OYES 7 NO 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bad been fined imprisoned had sentence suspended or placed on probation for violation of a�law or ordnance OYES 1NO / 13 Have You aver had a business my professional or liquor license'erected denied revoked suspended,or lined in this or other state OYES sO ,, le Have you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license'elected or denied OYES "(NO 15 Hes anyone aver filed suit Or obtained a lodgment ageinst you in any civil ection the sublect sal which involved fraud or � misrepresentation of a liquor related m r OYES EINO ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES tl ITEM # II jj(5.v4MEETING OF 4// � MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 141/714 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILrAn DAMIANO A.. AA _ r -VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN Ia- I l L _MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE , SUBMITTED BY ERNEST L . RUBENDALL AGENT FOR JR ' S PIZZA , BE AND HEREBY IS RECOMMENDED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL FOR APPROVAL . FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO . 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE , SUBMITTED BY ERNEST L . RUBENDALL AGENT FOR JR ' S PIZZA , BE AND HEREBY IS RECOMMENDED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL FOR DENIAL . FOR DENIAL 4' P4ACHF✓G „ j' ; • Z - Z c �RizONP ache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Approve, fan AgeR -, .-..— September 12, "ink a�l� lie tk rrtrs, fiendtv- Second Read~^e:Ifer MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CATZTCLOgiibanng 1d Business THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY , CITY MANAGER(.t1�/h• eivusiness FROM: 0L CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING—Consent Agenda„ SUBJECT: 1 REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-30-83 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16 , 1984 - SECOND READING Background Rezoning Case No. PZ-30-83, Proposed Ordinance No. 217, is a request by the applicant Greg Hamblin of Hamblin Diversified to rezone his property from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD for Parcel No. 1 and to CR-5 for Parcel No. 2. The site is located between Plaza and Monterey Drives , 120 feet north of 20th Avenue. On the four acre (4) Parcel No. 1 , the applicant proposes to develop 34 twin-homes on lot sizes of 3,150 square feet per dwelling unit and .�. utilizing a zero lot line system. The applicant intends to subdivide Parcel No. 1 - since this is a planned development, the applicant will provide 20% open/recreational space which will include a pool , recreation building and shuffleboard courts. For the 39,000 square feet Parcel No. 2 , the applicant is requesting conventional CR-5 zoning which could result in a maximum of 19 dwelling units based on our zoning ordinance's 2 ,000 square foot per dwelling unit requirements. However, the applicant has stated his intention to have a maximum of four (4) lots , each of which could be developed to a maximum of four (4) units. Zoning adjacent to the site is CR-5 on the south and the west and CR-3 to the east and north. Surrounding land uses include a church to the north, multiple family units to the south and west, and single family homes to the east. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor ^d Members of the City Council Adak Request for Agenda Item - September 18, 1984 PZ-30-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 217) September 12, 1984 Page Two Designation on the General Plan is "high density residential ". Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) and Planning Department Comments: The DCC had no objection to the twin-homes on Parcel No. 1 and four-plexes on Parcel No. 2. Detailed engineering and site design considerations �•. can be taken care of at the preliminary and final PD stage. The Planning Department would request that the floor plans be designed such that more of the facade of the homes would be viewed from the street rather than carports and cars. From the standpoint of compliance with the General Plan and the compatibility with the adjacent zoning and land uses, the Planning Department would recommend approval . Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation At their September 11 , 1984, meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission adopted the following motion by a 6-0 vote- (Taylor/Jorgensen) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that in rezoning case PZ-30-83 also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 217, application of Greg Hamblin of Hamblin Diversified for his property described as a matter of public record requesting rezoning from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5 Multiple Residence by Planned Development, (this is the twin homes that will be offered for sale) for both Parcel No. 1 and No. 2 , and rejecting the Parcel No. 2 , rezoning for multiple family, Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of this application as set forth with those changes. Stipulations or Recommendations are: 1. That the applicant dedicate the interior streets if they are to be public streets. 2. That the floorplans be redesigned so that more of the facade of the homes may be viewed from the street. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. Even though the multiple family rezoning is permissible under the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, it actually is not compatible with this particular area. Even though this area was designated a possible high density area by the General Plan, there is more CR-3 in this area. In my opinion, we should keep the CR-3 zoning if possible, and encourage these developers to put in homes for resale. It does comply with Section 33 of the General Plan (Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Apache Junction." CRN:jl 1 ) t we evl'FAR Zo"1,w6 I•elq.04T',rtWi,rlwlsq+wM,.M.w'N!NpF1NMMM6.11114 �'IV M M/rel$p"�'gnTUMV"fl M9ewt,Yy,,,rI,. ---7../.'-. Hi6H M6SO..12.r WALLS.-.`__.... „' 120.00. � 102 00' _ I' I 63 OG �j$,p0' gc,,ao 1 36 GO1 SS.Oo' SEs Lo0' ��G.00' SS.00' 3S.ao ' 3$.00• I 3c,�0O' 41 / I e r1T l011 II' i„ g ar�Ea o 1I' 'y .im w 11 2p 21 a 22 g :23r 2q- ° 2s �� 2� 28 2`l o �O I' II I 116 I i Q reit-Tp "— r jl - ii I I 110. o I Pj rr ezcr ITIon '� _ 9 I do ---- FA?) h0 ) 8 I _ 6,WPPGr. 7 0 11 ° E--- PLaza GII2GL[; E �-- I Q flil u°, m r df ' r , ° co � I`l I i' 20oo 2o.Gb' _ �� qaol ti IZEG I0.Ib .1 $ II — ,..li i ' o F id 6dJZ-,.a I0� N \ I--- _ '' IN CI m m 4 N I I fillii an vuiTE¢� 14 s r— �— �LAza, �IIZG,La uo f-- DEws�l(� _ R I r.a .9 I ,�i I� 1PETO .1 I R£TEnTioN I _/ n I -g - S 8 0 / 8 / p i i o N j� • �1 • �� m o 2ETe-rrio1'I I2 I. s 8 7 Q Gj rii` / 2 0 I 8 If ll--"` -1.- ii II O.00' , y 104 001 I cps 00' °i6_00' 3c.,OO' 3S.Oo' SS,oo' ,se,00' ss aa'' C SS oo' ss OO' ' 3S.ao' sy oo' 36.0o' I. I 6-0' H1641 M6Sp,2Y W .-S J - Czor. -2 o= -Ks...L..... c e r> Kores LOTS 1 c.'.:N 1-,or IS TO IZ TAIN t_oT5 I TN¢J 11 . to THrzv'54=3'Sobat. • 1-a owN wnrcrL WTz, 1'1.T{h2V I.1 s Q•2OO 6 �. 4i ,o- TD N<.JG EaGF{ 9L TLESACv Oz1vGu6.Y5 ►.7^.rNr01Jm Ao q,90o 0 EAGI 3. a„ ..6 S.,Rc61s (( 0 w N T _ 6 de 4 sucT wATrrt. cs.� s :� ____---5UP AZS T I T ION HEIGHTS s �a� F6 sclo ,06 G W% 2F'5 E66 I� .,go. bl ot0 60 Fr,, 2.0"' 40 41. 2PTe,r,or1 areas f EUMINA2 Gow102 =Coll()$I3"Deep= 1I(j06V FT 1 Y r�L/->T (46°I(7 6F EA) 5 ,gr.4s An RCM ao TILITIG' _ " U I" 30 ' ..�I c.1 IV 1 TY AAA? ,...,:.-rear- b2120rIA V✓bTEL GO. tw «+.mac 4Evc_f(—, IN10,,,,,aJAL..ziarlICi 1._ Eatci 4 ..rl rLvErt P''-BU T Tr!-I . /i,n'1 IT/1r I if•4.1.'..- TI w 1 ....., .....„„ Plan 1052 r ds0 , ,e,..,z.,.1r.. W4 . 4a,„II. (Viiii iit .� , _ ELEVATION A Imo!ir. ___=___ - == —_ — -rLr0,flt ________ __ 1:-,,,,, , 1 i . - - _ - --.„-----,„,r01.1ifil % '1N•' Itl I 'I�, + ; 11 i ,• IF +■ + I 11 •`1 . �, SerA,, -... • I l J �, . --- "i c k4_,. -: YN'N 9v P 4�-a'� \1 a \\\1�le '�- �111IIINIIIIIIIIII•D., .n• . ELEVATION B Y.,:.-z.-42110111 'i 01 I iiii:,,, „. II (;.:,„I i IT 1 , 11.,. ri ;,, i ii I. it, lit....,,,,.-..e„.„..,...,.., \!,V/ 1//f% a F .ram 11irr �� v �; - <� � . , P,7,:, 111, _ + -,,.,,,,vote, ELEVATION C r':4Vt 11, :.7..-TLllr -_-11.-.-..-.1. _ l•it, _ -_--_1-_-:'-;-.,---.,,,--"_-I'-_Ii---iI----,-1--2,--_s1—-1 (,1 II� r' , w :;.a'`" , % um �'e _ '� i' i "'mom ...'0 A u',,'' 1 r voi01 n,on ;'II ,ins ti , v-,•,)' I__ Elevations will vary slightly depending upon floor plan. Contractor reserves the right to make minorin charges in dimensions and alterations tit materials• elevations a other conditions es depicted in draw- mg,or dasplasled in model units. wl. ♦P 9139. • V V-V V V-V v • - COVERED PATIO '*� I • MASTER BEDROOM lij --"' 411 BEDROOM 2 7 i MASTERH O BAT OJ O `1F.I..,), 0- Lit,30 1 L-X--; BATH 2 BEDROOM 3 --- --- r _J L. 81- lE. KITCHEN 00 -0 0- 00� 00 UVING ROOM a DINING ♦� lo`a � 4•00e.0Al o , .t 0 s n1' Q/ 1 : i 1 W ;LAUNDRY) D c `ii el ®STORAGE 1 i. ...Fe*® III 01 a t i� .. DOUBLE CARPORT 4 0t Il I veining' 1111 September 11 " 1984 � Tu the City CouncL1 and specifically the Planning and Zoning Committee; We are unable to attend this rezoning meeting and wish to inform you that we are agaLnst any rezoning of sLngle family dwelling areas to multiple family areas. We feel that Apache JALtjon will naturally evolve into a community which, if planned correctly wLll include a � large family population. You must think of the future--especal ] y with � the C. A. P. guaranteeing water to this area. We must insure thLs by � preserving planned single fbmzly subdzv3szons and protect those that � are already estabiLshed. It isn' t fair to homeowners to rezone � parcels in their neighborhoods. If this were being done in your � neighborhood, would you vote in favor of zLr lherefore, please do not � vote to rezone the area to the South and West of St. George` s Church. � We are also in favor of a permanent morztouzum of R. V. and � trailer parks. � � � Sincerely -' � Al & Carol Cranmer � � � � � eik /'1 =1. ORDINANCE NO. 217 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-30-83 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL 1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as Parcel No 1 (from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development) The South 1 of the Southeast 1 of the Northwest I of the Southeast 4 of Section 29, Township '1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the west 120 feet thereof, and Parcel No 2 (from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone) The west 120 feet of the South z of the Southeast 4 of the Northwest $ of the Southeast * of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development, and from CR-3 Single Residence to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone 2. The approval of the zoning district classification shall be construed as only concept approval for the base zoning and shall serve as official approval of the base zoning amendment to the Zoning Map 3 Development of said property shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes, policies, guides, and detailed OgiS standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improvements 4. Applicant shall dedicate all rights-of-way and easements as required by the City prior to final plan approval SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• a i A Cit Attorney I 1 ORDINANCE NO 217 PAGE TWO OF TWO PZ-30-83 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 217 PARCEL NO, 1: PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. PARCEL NO. 2: PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE. I I I cR-3 j I —_ -- -- — _=___ — _— -' I cR-3 I II cR-5 I I I II I 31------ - ----' —_ ---1 I II I W. 18TH AVENUE ICR-3 NCR-5 I --- -- ------- ---I -----! �i CR-3 l I I 11 I —_ I I I LLI II ` • w QaI-- 11--i \ a)�1 CR-3 Ir Q o II o � ° El I _,A. _` L_ J �,r_ _ — — - i ... l I cR-5 cR-5 II I I 11 W. MMTH AVFNI Ew — — — 1 if I , I II CR-5 l o 1 CR-5 1 II=== - - - --- ---I i--_ —_ ___- I I wj II I CR-3 I "I CR-3 II I_ — — — — - - - - —J N!- - - - --II— — - I` 112 PARCEL 2 - SUBJECT SITE PARCEL 1 - SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1"-200' r-� 7 1 LIMITS OF ZONING I._ J Aink PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ-30- S.3 where a zone change is proposed from C Ae 3 to c f-M at A- I ; C N F %t /c (location) B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: ," 1 . 2. ///11 /1tit /A-( /i UGC-fit 1 E s; f • � u/ j3. f 4. jyi;ntr-aittx 4:2) z) 5. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) _`�1-2,a SIGNATURE ��� C � BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . PA- 1 C� �� 0'fF/ .� r G �.� Jo). - D 6f - pl o o 2. - - J. - 4. - - STATE OF ,Ocr°4fe.•4, ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. ii tk day of Seffe,n`ey , 19 `" , COUNTY OF hLbca ) by • NOTARY PUBLIC 6 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. f „-f;:Lv STI'TE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by C1 d�S h8b1 NO ' PlT6LI MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NQt10*,f O3 J33b 0 A113 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / tjh j ))/\pJ 12/ f() ITEM # MEETING / F MOTION BY: dtyt/ SECONDED BY: 1 k'f YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR V COUNCILMAN HILL VICE_MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V -nCOU __MAYOR_ CLARKF UNANI 0US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED j ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0� q,e .d4/ I/ 0/101/ by er ,0 /' (P7 ITEf1 # 1/ MEETING OF IU � 6 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: m 0/ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIII ABSTAINED M . I: ANO IIIIEIIIIIIIIIIIII ILMAN HILL I ^ ILf ML TAYLOR IllnilliillIllIl . . nrr:1► :nem ICE MAYOR EIDSON • • 1 I' ...-_. -' MAYOR CLARKE UNANI^.OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL A"i, ITEM NO . 12 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 217 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 217 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING. Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 217 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-30-83 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ; AND FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO. 12 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 217 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 217 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 217 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-30-83 FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ; AND FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL PgACHF✓o O l' n0A O U ill Z q��Z" `city o (Apache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 10, 1984 .... MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER f FROM: �,.et,) CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO PACKET INFORMATION - SPETEMBER 18, 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - PZ-29-84 (DAMIANO) In response to dialogue between the applicant and City Council on this case at the September 4th public hearing, I have attached some information which may be helpful : 1. Excerpts from the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing of March 13, 1984 and the City Council public hearing of April 3, 1984 on PZ-3-84 (Rafferty) . This case, located across Highway 88 from Damiano's property, was granted rezoning to CB-2. 2. Excerpts from the City's CB-1, CB-2, and CI-1 district regulations which relate to the applicant' s intentions to use the property for a golf cart rebuilding facility. The specifics of what constitutes a permitted use in a particular zone is the responsibility of the Zoning Administrator, with the applicant having the right of appeal to the Board of Adjustment. CRN:mas Approver for Agenda /J First Reading D to Item # Second Reading" ' -s - Public Hearing —- Old Business - New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 /'` Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 13, 1984 10. Jim Crofford represented the applicants and stated that they want to rezone two parcels to CB-2 to use or sell for future business. 11 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition of the case, he asked for staff recommendation 12 Mr Nakagawa stated there was no objection and recommended ^k. a dedication of right-of-way. 13. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 14 Sansoni/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning _v Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-2-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 254, application of Donna and Robert Loewenstein for their property 2.4 described as, a matter of public record, requesting ' rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to • the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application "Any stipulations are • The applicant dedicate the west seventeen feet (17' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes "The reason for the recommendation is It is currently consistent with the General Plan." The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0). 15. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-3-84, Proposed Ordinance No 256, a rezoning from CR-1 to CB-2 He asked for staff briefing. 16 Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 17 Chairman asked if the applicant would like to speak on this case. 18 Mike Kovacs stated that Mr Short would also be involved • in the project as a co-owner representing Mr. Rafferty. 19. Roger Short said he appreciated all the staff assistance received and they want to build a boat storage and maintenance facility He commented that a precedent had been set by the existing _•.. ,..-,. - CB-2 uses. 20. Mr Taylor asked if he had any objections to a planned development as suggested by staff 21. Mr. Kovacs replied that he had been involved with PD's and they are very expensive and not feasible for this project He added that they will strive 1 to keep the area and recreation route as it is now 22 Mr Taylor asked about stipulating screening 23. Mr. Kovacs replied that there is no obnoxious use planned as it will be for boat storage and a service bay area He commented that CB-1 would not be able to facilitate the type of development they want He added that CB-2 zoning is there 24. Mr Sansoni noted that the transmittal stated that the y property was 500' south of Lost Dutchman which was in error __ 1 r Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 13, 1984 t 25. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for staff recommendation 26 Mr Nakagawa stated that the area should be allowing s recreational/commercial uses, but that some control should be applied He added that a dedication of right-of-way was recommended for the north fifty feet of the subject property He noted that the applicant has applied for t ` I a General Plan amendment which is under separate review and amendments are normally considered on an annual basis - . 27. Mr. Taylor asked what staff recommendation was. • _ 28 Mr Nakagawa replied that the staff is not opposed to the -,-Y PD designation being applied. 29. Mr. Sansoni was concerned about adequate ingress-egress. 30 Mr Nakagawa stated that a safe-sight distance was needed in each direction 31. Mr. Taylor asked if this was to go PD if it would fall into the new Ordinance 32 Mr McNulty replied that the new Ordinance will not -- i come up for public hearing until a future meetin. _ .«�; and then it goes to the City Council. __ 33. Chairman asked if the applicant had any rebuttal 34 Mr Kovacs stated that access will be a problem no matter what the property is zoned He added that Lost Dutchman would possibly be graded through in the next two years and that it was a main arterial. He added that if they are asked to take a lesser zone, they will wait until October for the General Plan to be reviewed He said that local business zoning was not - heavy enough for the area and that he was --- - asking for what others in the area already had. He commented that he would take CB-1 if it could 01.1\ be upgraded to CB-2 later. 35 Mr McNulty noted that if they did and the property was sold it would revert back to CB-1 unless sold to someone to continue an existing business. 36. Mr. Vehon asked if stipulations could be put in that .,_vim,;; ..- -.,; - 1 no manufacturing be done. -- 37 Mr McNulty replied that if it can be done under the zone .. they cannot change it 38 Mr Polomskey noted that under the City Ordinance they can either grant CB-2 or not grant it r 39. Mr. Vehon commented it could be granted with a stipulation that it would be reviewed within one year 40 Mr Kovacs stated he had no problem with the reverter suggested by Mr McNulty •• 1 41 Chairman there being no further rebuttal or discussion, { he called for a motion. 42 Polomskey/Vehon M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona Page Four Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 13, 1984 that in rezoning case PZ-3-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 256, application of 1 Daniel Rafferty through Mike Kovacs for his 1 property described as, a matter of public 4 record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. i "Any stipulations or recommendations are l 1. The applicant dedicate the north fifty I feet (50' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes 2 That an approval for a General Plan amend- _ i \ ment or a specific plan be approved for this site to General Commercial. - "The reasons for this recommendation are 1 The request is not in compliance with the General Plan, but will probably be in compliance in the future 2. It would be the highest and best use of the property at this time " The motion passed unanimously (6-0-0). 43. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-4-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 257, a rezoning from GR to CB-2 He asked for staff briefing I___ 44. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 45 Chairman asked if the applicant was present to speak on the case 46. Kenneth Ragan stated he intended to develop the property himself and it would be either a mobile home sales or storage area after the Freeway is developed ,/� ::. Mr Taylor noted that the two parcels north of Southern were not in a commercial opportunity zone Mr Ragan commented that the isolated GR parcel owner - was not opposed to the rezoning. 49. Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor 50 Norman Thompson stated he has a financial interest in this property and that residential would be out of place here. He added that approval would mean additional income to the city. 51 Chairman there being no one else to speak in favor, he asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. 52. Dan Peterson stated he lives outside of the City limits and wanted to know how this would affect his permit for a fence forty feet from his property line and how it would change his horse privileges with Solana cutting through 53 Chairman noted that the five-year plan has the Freeway only to Power Road and Southern only being completed to Ellsworth I Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa, briefed the Council on the rezoning case from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, located on the east side of Ironwood Drive, 200 feet and 600 feet south of Apache Trail in Section 20. Mr. Jim Crawford, 101 S. Ironwood ' Drive, Apache Junction, representing Donna L. and Robert L. Loewenstein, requested approval of the rezoning application /►. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. • Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Devel- opment and Coordinating Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission both recommend approval with dedication of right-of-way. • Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 254, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO 254, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 256, PZ-3-84 RAFFERTY (First Reading) the public ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the rezoning application from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business ommk Zone, located on the north side of Highway 88 and on the south side of Lost Dutchman Boulevard in Section 15. Mr. Mike Kovacs, 710 S Lawson, Apache Junction, introduced Mr. Roger Short, a co-owner in the project, to give a presentation. Mr. Roger Short, 1256 S. Buena > ->._- _� ._�:_•.-,rev Vista, Apache Junction, requested approval of the rezoning for the purpose of a recreational enterprise Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon Associate Planner for recommendations Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Development and Coordinating Committee recommends approval with stipulating dedications for public roadways, and the Planning and Zoning Commission also recommend approval, and that this may require a General Plan amendment. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 3, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Kovacs asked Mr McNulty to explain the alternate options. City Manager McNulty explained that in the event that the rezoning will benefit the community rather than a small number of people, a rezoning may be made without a General Plan amend-; ment Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public, and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 256, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read 1 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 256, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING 1 THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-3-84 FROM CR-2 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING f ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 257, PZ-4-84 RAGAN, STAGNARO, AND THOMPSON (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Council on the application for rezoning from General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, located on the north side of Southern Avenue between Acacia and Starr Roads in Section 27 Mr Kenneth Ragan, 2386 N. Valley Drive, Apache Junction, requested approval of the proposed use of trailer sales. Vice Mayor Eidson wished to know if this use could be done with a CB-1 zoning, with the concern of detrimental use to the church located across from the parcel. Mr. Ragan stated that nothing detri- 0001..., mental would be placed on this property. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr Nakagawa stated that the Devel- opment and Coordinating Committee has no objections, and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public and called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 257, by title only for the first reading as follows: City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 3, 1984 PAGE 5 p ARTICLE 15 CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE: SEC. 1501 USES PERMITTED: a. Any use permitted in Section 1401 (TR Transitional Zone). b. The following uses , which in any CB-1 zone shall be conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building unless otherwise specified and any use operating as a store, shop or business, shall be a retail establishment and all products produced on the premises shall be sold at retail on the premises • Antique store Apparel store Art needlework or hand-weaving establishment Art gallery or store Auto parking lot (within or without building) Bakery Bank, safe depository or trust company Barber or beauty shop 4.4014. A Bicycle shop (no sales or servicing of motor scooter or motorcycles Book, newspaper, magazine, stationery, art or drawing supply store Cafe, lunch room (provided no dancing is allowed and no alcoholic beverages sold except beer and wine) Catering service Church Cigar store Cleaning, dyeing, laundry, collection agency Clinic Club or lodge (non-profit) Community service agency Confectionary store Custom dressmaking, millinery, hemstitching or pleating Custom weaving or mending Day nursery or child-care center Dealer in coins , stamps or similar collector' s items Delicatessen store Dental or medical laboratory Department store, variety store idOr - 39 - oft. Amok ARTICLE 16 CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE: SEC. 1601 USES PERMITTED: a. Any use permitted in Section 1401 (TR Transitional .�. Zone) and in Section 1501 (CB-1 Local Business Zone) . b. Advertising sign, structure or billboard, subject to Article 22. Amusement or recreation enterprise (within a completely enclosed structure) including billiard or pool hall , bowling alley, dance hall , gymnasium, penny arcade, shooting gallery, skating rink, sports arena. Amusement or recreational enterprise (outdoor) including archery range, miniature golf or practice driving or putting range, games of skill or science, pony riding ring without stables, swimming pool or commercial beach or bathhouse, tennis court. Auction, public (no animals) Auditorium or assembly hall Auto rental garage ,_____Auto repair, mechanical or steam washracks , battery service (no body or fender work, painting or upholstery, except as incidental ) Bar, cocktail—Sounge,nTPt ETub, tavern Baths (Turkish, Swedish, steam, etc. ) Blueprinting, photostating Boats, storage or rental Burglar alarm service Carpenter shop Cigar manufacturing (custom hand-rolled) Cleaning establishment, if only two clothes cleaning units of not more than 40 pounds rated capacity, and using cleaning fluid which is non-flammable and non-explosive at temperatures below 138.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Club: Athletic, private, social , sport or recreational (operated for profit) except sports stadium or field. Engraving, photo-engraving, lithographing Fair, carnival or tent show for not longer than 15 days , if sufficient parking area for patrons is provided. Fortune-telling - *1;0 - 43 - Alm Amok Garage, public (for commercial use) Juke box or coin machine business (limited to assembly, repair and servicing) Laundry, steam or wet-wash Lumber yard, retail (provided no machinery is used other than a rip saw and cut-off saw) Locksmith, tool or cutlery sharpening, lawnmower +. repairing, fix-it or handyman shop Massage establishment, reducing salon or gymnasium Mattress shop for repairing only (no renovating) Merchandise broker' s display, wholesale ' _Motorcycle or motor scooter repair or storaT) Mortuary or embalming establishment or schooT` Newspaper office Oxygen equipment, rental or distribution Pawn shop Piano repairing Plumbing, retail custom Printing or publishing Record recording studio or sound score production (no manufacturing or treatment of records) Refrigeration installation or service School or college (operated as a commercial enterprise for dancing or musical instruction; industrial or trade school teaching operations or occupation permitted in this zone). Sheetmetal or tinsmith shop Sign painting shop Mini-storage building only Trade show, industrial show or exhibition Transfer or express service Upholstery shop Wallpaper sales , paper hanging c. Sale, rental or display of -- a an.es_or parts ``-Au-tomobf l es) Barber's supplies or beauty shop equipment Butcher's supplies Clothing or accessories (wholesale) Contractor's equipment or supplies Drugs or medical , dental or veterinary supplies (wholesale) Farm equipment or machinery Feed (wholesale) Garage equipment Hardware (retail or wholesale) \mi0 - 44 - Olt Hotel equipment or supplies Household appliances, sewing machines, etc. (wholesale) Machinery, commercial and industrial Monuments or tombstones (no wholesale) Office equipment (safes, business machines , etc. ) (wholesale) Orthopedic appliances (trusses, wheel chairs , etc. ) Painting equipment or supplies (paint, varnish, etc. ) Pet (no boarding or hospital ) Plastic or plastic products (wholesale) Plumbing, heating and ventilating fixtures or supplies Restaurant or soda fountain equipment or supplies Second-hand goods Personal , furniture, books, magazines, automobiles, but not second-hand auto parts Tents or awnings Trailers Trunks or luggage (wholesale) Upholsterer's supplies Venetian blinds Window shades d. Light manufacturing or assembling incidental to 7` retail sales from the premises, provided that not more than 25% of the floor is occupied by businesses engaged in manu- facturing, processing, assembling, treatment, installation and repair of products. e. Wholesaling of products permitted in Section 1501-b unless specifically prohibited, with storage space not exceeding 1,500 square feet of floor area. f. Cemetary or crematory, provided that cemetaries for human remains shall be located on a site of not less than five acres, and for animal pets not less than one acre, and that no crematory be erected closer than 500 feet from any boundary of said site adjoining property in rural or residential zone g. Drive-in theater, provided that the face of any projection screen be not visible from any county road or any street or route shown on the adopted Map of Major Thoroughfares and Proposed Routes (Map C, Section 502) , which is within 500 feet of said screen; provided further that the site for said theater shall consist of not less than 10 acres of land and be a single tract or parcel not intersected or divided by any street, alley, or by property belonging to other owners; that any lights kvilf - 45 - ... Am, ARTICLE 17 CI-1 LIGHT INDUSTRY AND WAREHOUSE ZONE: SEC. 1701 USES PERMITTED: a. Any use permitted in Section 1501-b (CB-1 Local Business Zone) and in Sections 1601-b and 1601-c (CB-2 General Business Zone) . b. One dwelling unit for a watchman or caretaker and his family. ,, --- c. Any of the following if conducted wholly within a completely enclosed building. 1 . Manufacture, compounding, processing, packaging or treatment of: Bakery goods, candy, cosmetics , dairy products , drugs and pharmaceutical products, soap (cold process only) and food products, except fish or meat products, sauerkraut, vinegar, yeast and the rendering or refining of fats and oils. 2. Manufacture, compounding, assembling or treatment of articles or merchandise from the following previously prepared .� materials. Bone, broom corn, cellophane, canvas, cloth, cork, feathers, felt, fiber, fur, glass, hair or bristles, horn, leather, paper, plastics or plastic products, precious or semi- precious metals or stones, shell , textiles, tobacco, wax (paraffin, tallow, etc. ) , wood (excluding sawmill or planing mill ) , yarns, paint (not employing a boiling process). 3. Manufacture of: Glass, pottery or other similar ceramic products (using only previously prepared sand or pulver- ized clay, and kilns fired only by electricity or gas) , musical instruments, toys, novelties, rubber or metal stamps. 4. Manufacture and maintenance of: Electric and neon signs, billboards , commercial advertising structures and displays , light sheet metal products , including heating or cool - ing, and ventilating ducts and equipment, cornices, eaves and the like. 5. Automobile or trailer assembling, painting, up- t holstering, rebuilding, reconditioning , sale of used parts , J 1 truck repair or overhauling, tire rebuilding or recapping, ,/ battery manufacture and the like. 6. Blacksmith and welding shop or machine shop (excluding punch presses over 20 tons rated capacity, and drop - 48 - /',, oink o(). o J ac/ie ( unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 7 , 1984 ram, MEMORANDUM: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL !n THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: %CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-29-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288) AUGUST 7, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 SEPTEMBER 4, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Case Description Rezoning case No. PZ-29-84 Proposed Ordinance No. 288, is a request by the applicants A. Richard and Jennie Damiano to rezone their property from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 4.15 acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Highway 88 and E. Hildalgo Street in Section 15. It is designated Local Commercial Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include Mary's Country Store, Kovacs' Korner, vacant land, and a single-family home. The applicant had stated on the rezoning application that the rezoning is being requested to "sell and repair golf carts." The letter dated July 16 , 1984 from Mr. R.D. Damiano (the applicants 's son) describes the intended activities to be established on the subject property. The applicant has also filed for abandonment of East Hildalgo Street to the north of the subject property and North Bowman Road to the west. This abandonment request is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on September 4, 1984, so the matter of necessary street dedications will be resolved prior to Council consideration of this rezoning. Approver for Agenda ICJ--- Date Item # First Reading 2 Second Reading /Mt Public Hearing ✓Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayur and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) August 7, 1984 Page Two Planning Department Comments The staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the south thirty- three feet (33' ) and the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject property riN for public roadway and associated purposes if Hildalgo Street and Bowman Road is abandoned. If these streets are not abandoned staff would also recommend the dedication of the necessary property along the North and West sides of the property. Due to the designation on the adopted General Plan of Local Commercial Opportunity Area , the staff would recommend rezoning to CB-1 , but not CB-2. Although a discussion concerning the intended uses for a property being considered for a conventional rezoning is usually irrelevant, in this case, the applicants' possible misperception of the requirements of both the CB-1 and CB-2 districts may render him incapable of establishing his intended use of the property should rezoning be granted. To operate in a CB-1 zone, it would be necessary for the City Council to adopt a resolution as authorized in Section 1501(b) of the Zoning Ordinance to permit sale and repair of electric golf carts in a CB-1 zone provided that, in the opinion of the City Council , the use is "not more obnoxious or detrimental to the welfare of the particular community than the enter- prises or business above enumerated. " (List of uses in Section 1501(b) .) It is the opinion of the Planning Department staff that the sale and repair of electric golf carts would not be more obnoxious , however, any such use would have to comply with the CB-1 regulations which require that the business shall be a retail establishment and all products produced on the premises shall be sold at retail on the premises. Resolution No. 84-36 is included for your consideration. Unfortunately, from the applicants' standpoint, from the information contained in the letter of July 16th and through conversations with the applicant, this CB-1 designation would not be appropriate for their intended use, and there is the possibility that even CB-2 would not be appropriate as reflected in the memo from the Zoning Administrator of July 19th which is included in this packet, stating that CI-1 zoning would be necessary for rebuilding and reconditioning of golf carts. I apologize for the length of this commentary, but felt it would be help- ful background information to eliminate confusion likely to arise during the public hearing. The Honorable Mayorirnd City Council .� Request for Agenda em PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) August 7, 1984 Page Three Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of July 10, 1984, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that rezoning case PZ-29-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 288, application of A. Richard and Jennie Damiano for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-1 Local Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. The applicant dedicate the north, south, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) and the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. Enter with this Motion presented to the City Council recommendation , that this type of business that the applicant desires to put on this be considered an appropriate business for this type of commercial zoning. The reasons for this recommendation are: This does comply with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction. This area is definitely a commercial area and any other type of rezoning would not be appropriate." Recommended Motions for PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) . Option #1 ( If CB-2 zoning is to be approved) BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , that rezoning case PZ-29-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 288, application of A. Richard and Jennie Damiano for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, be and hereby is approved. Amk Amok The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-29-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 288) August 7 , 1984 Page Four Option #2 (If CB-1 zoning is to be approved) BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that rezoning case PZ-29-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 288, application of A. Richard and Jennie Damiano , for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone, be and hereby is amended and approved to CB-1 Local Business Zone. In addition , along with the above motion , if CB-1 zoning is to be approved: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No. 84-36 , "A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT ELECTRIC GOLF CART SALES AND REPAIR ARE NOT MORE OBNOXIOUS OR DETRIMENTAL THAN THOSE PERMITTED USES AS SET FORTH IN THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 1501(b) , AND THAT ELECTRIC GOLF CART SALES AND REPAIR ARE DECLARED TO BE PERMITTED USES IN SECTION 1501(b) OF THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE," be and hereby is approved. CRN:jl D 0:I � GOLF CARS ;v, add & 7.eivilt 5606 East McKellips Road / Mesa, Arizona 85205 / Telephone' (602) 985-0111 July 16, 1984 Mn. Chanee. Newcomer ReC alvLt_Yig uieec tofL Ckty o6 Apache Jct. , AZ Re.: PZ-29-84( Pnopouied OAd.#288 Dean Mn. Newcomer: O) th regard to the ne-zovLcng o6 my bathe ' (A. R. Dam-cano) 'teat pnopen ty i.vi Section 15, I w.c:a.e a temp- to deoscn be the act.Lv-c tc.e-o that wAlt be peAUo)umed by D & T Go.e6 Canto on that pnopenty. The ptu..many woe ob the pnem-toes wiet be. the. -to-ta.e nebwUd.Lng otS go1U ccvib. We paan to have. a 6enced compound o6 appnox,cma.eay 5,000 .to 10,000 /sq. 6-t. to 25tone the canto to be. nebu.c.et. The bwi.eding will be o6 a-teea coniotAuctt.on con a nkng 3,000 to 5,000 ioq. {y.t. W-c th-Ln Th-us area, woidamen will remove the body pieces, i.e. 6endeAz, cowl, bumper; °thous will remove and nebu.cad the mo-tonz. The. chaio.cJo ,c..s then nebu c.aL, /opn,inigio, (ynovi.t zuzpenzion and zteeAkng Lo nepaaced on nepcuin.ed as -Lis needed. A new on nepaAcned body w-c..lt be. .c.rustalied and the can wAll be bnought to a iopnay booth where it wilt be. nepa.LvLted. The can then enteAv the. bu.c.ed-up Dotage, where the motor, ba tenc_e.o, .Uce'o, top, a-c..ght4, up- hoaa.teny, canpe-t, windahaeadts, etc. , are -ws-taeted on the veh.Lcees. The. can ,cis then .teted and nead..ed Son zdee. I hope. ,thtis will hap to cecvti y the uoe we. intend .on the. pnopenty. IU I can be o6 any other cusz-cJo.tance -to you, p.eeaue call me. at 985-0111 on 985-0622. 7,y_viii., i yaunJo, R. . D Gana RDD/bd -' r f-'-x, cc / / ",: `�; , ...Y Jut is iv 4 il-L-;)T. OF PLANNING Sala --- �'Prwice t'�za r9 O -41, 1zoNP �DiL o� C ac�ie s u coon DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT July 16, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: LEO FRAZIER, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FROM: GA C UCK NEWCOMER, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S INTERPRETATION RELATED TO PZ-29-84 For a rezoning application (PZ-29-84) the applicant has stated that he intends to set-up, in a CB-2 zone, an operation which would involve the substantial refurbishment and repair of used golf carts. These carts would then be transported to another location for sale, with some sales possible at this repair center. Question: Would such an operation be permitted in the CB-2 zone; and what type of restrictions would apply? CRN•mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 PeACHF✓0 IOC ti0 '' O U 1' t'Z r 4W' ,tau:= gR1zONP C�� . , ?,t � C% �`41 �;�2� 2r",1.�'LClZO?Z July 19, 1984f°' R . a ..JUL 101984 DEPT. OF PLA; ,,;;, TO: Director of Planning ,AND DEVELUP .,�;;i FROM: Zoning Administrator 1 ✓ RE: PZ-29-84 In response to your request, I have researched the zoning ordinance to determine what zone would be appropriate and necessary for rebuilding and reconditioning golf carts. It is my opinion that this use falls under Sec. 1701 c 5; thus would require CI-1 (Light Industry) zoning and would have to be conducted from within a completely enclosed building. Also, since the use apparently falls into the aforemention section, it would be prohibited in any more restrictive zone pursuant to Sec. 302 g. /'� LF:sr 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 o TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 .•. PZ-29-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 288 i PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ' Ox/.f� 71.0Grds n //1 I / CB-2 r / 1 ' CB-2 /�� / 1 / 1 / E. H •ALGO STREET 1 4,0 {". _.w.'wi..s--.-4; k c l P,- V i.i?,47'4%ai l.-YS h'...— 4 .a -`i. ..µ. f@ iT' ci CC I 0 t • t r I E w A. cn a ' o f 0. # '`. •OTHIL ' ti: .s.:"' i SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1"=200' r— 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDCR IS CR-1 SINGLE FAMILY I _I RESIDENCE) ir—mir ORDINANCE NO 288 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: I- SECTION I IN GENERAL ,Im` The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as. The South 2 of the Northeast ; of the Northeast ; of the Northwest ; of Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-1 Single Residence to CB-2 General Business Zone; subject to the stipulation that the applicant dedicate the south thirty-three feet (33'), and the east forty feet (40') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 /.1111N Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk I APPROVED AS TO FORM 4Davi F. Alexander City Attorney AI111\ AM. PZ-29-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 288 .•. PROPOSED REZONE FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE DUTCHMAN D - ---- I _CB_-_27 // I I I I /I / / 1 CB-2 / CB-2 / I I / I // ,xPy ' - -- - ---/ I // \, E. HIDALGO STREET I / , IE. WINDSONG STREET 0 n o ala ca a W Q 0 O 0 O W /► -J I d Z Q N = = U w U Q IO W 0 d V) 0 U Q O w U w 2 W Z U J 0 - Q U z F- Z ( z - Z _ z E. FOOTHILL STREET SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1"=200' r I LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS CR-1 SINGLE FAMILY L _I RESIDENCE) it e \CHF ,�� U � 'rr ,Z -11?/ZoNP (- Zt y on L- z.9 ache CyunGtZOn )E :fir r� September 25, 1984 A. Richard & Jennie Damiano 2304 N. Cortez Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Mr. & Mrs . Damiano: To reiterate the information stated in my memo of July 19, 1984, which was written in response to your proposed uses, as outlined in your letter of July 16, 1934, the zoning classification required for the rennovation of golf carts would be CI-1 (Light Industry) . Also, as previously stated the use falls into a section of the CI-i article which requires that all such business would have to be conducted from within a completely enclosed building (Sec. 1701 .c.5) . I hope that this information will clarify matters for you. Respectfully, Leo Frazier Jr. , Zoning Administrator LF:sw cc: Director of Planning 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE!UNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # (/ MEETING OF I / MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Yelt".4 YES NO ABSTAINED TE . COUNCILMAN HILL J COUNC I LrAN TAYLOR / _ CO UNC I LMAN DAM I ANO VICE flAYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANITOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHE NOTES 61) .... evo / („),„ \r ITEi1 #_ , i MEETING OF /0 ‘i S�y1 r MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: ._,'./ d1 y YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FIDSON ..... COUNCILMAN TAYLOR CI1NCILMAN HII I__ v _COUNCILMAN DAMIANO - _MAYOR CLARKE V UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED 4 ABSTAINED TOTAL 4 { 1 ITEM NO . 13 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 288 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 288 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 288 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , ZONING - ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO . 13 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 288 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 288 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . S. 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 288 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-84 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED. FOR DENIAL #^ Aft. /0 ' 0,tP/Otis city o r4ace c 9unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT July 11 , 1984 : 1 Approver for Agenda / .�. _Qal� itc $ MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading �, % �s' Second Reading 1Z Public Hearing 7/�/W THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER ,`, 7 / ✓ Old Business r,{/ /4/ FROM: ceti CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-31-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 289) AUGUST 7, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING AUGUST 21 , 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case PZ-31-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 289, is a request by the applicants Dunrite Asphalt, Inc. through Bob Cosby to rezone their property from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. The site is a vacant 12 acre parcel located on the southwest side of Highway 60, 800 feet northwest of Tomahawk Road in Section 28. It is designated General Commercial Opportunity and Medium Density Residential on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include houses, industrial land, vacant property, and the KOA trailer park. �-� Planning Department Comments This is an irregularly-shaped parcel with access only onto Highway 60. The General Commercial Opportunity Area designation in the General Plan extends approximately 200 feet parallel to the Highway, but the General Plan does make the provision that the commercial area may be considered to include part to all of any lot which is partially or totally within the 200 foot boundary. In this situation there exists a potential problem of adequate buffering or transition between CB-2 uses and the CR-3 zoned residential neighborhood (Palm Springs) to the west. In this conventional rezoning application, the impact on these neighboring residential properties cannot be accurately assessed. There are three protests to this rezoning. The Bigley' s lie outside the 150' radius, and the Miller letter is not notarized nor does it contain Catherine Miller' s signature. Frances Heide' s protest is the only valid one. It only represents 5.7% of the area and, therefore, a 3/4' s vote is not required for approval in this case. ;Jl NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-31-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 289) July 11 , 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of July 10, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Vehon/Rogers 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-31-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 289, application of Dunrite Asphalt, Inc. for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . That nothing over single story be constructed on this parcel of land. 2. That from a point 300' south of the Highway, parallel to the Highway, to the southern boundary of the property, that it be stipulated that nothing but a mini-storage use be used on that portion of the property. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . This will bring this property into compliance with the General Plan. 2. Due to the irregular shape of this property, it is a hard one to pick a use for the back end of this property, and in stipulating a mini-storage zoning this might serve as a good buffer and be a good use and a compatible use to the homes to the west. " CRN:mas Omsk PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ-3/- 1 where a zone change is proposed from;', ,. _ to %n-z U-srvtih1r_ at // .S/Ac of- �ct�;=�•tv�'f�k7/?//'l1Ni�i�rp. »����✓ems (location) Li ,c;9,E i4AV,EL_ B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. /IN D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband r and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. a.9 E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: sc-7-2 1 .-f'21'NT L//i i 4)/1//B, .1 /)«r'6< r>r'«T/f/G'-//E4' 'ft/r'/%7/ LIS 2. CY /.n( "7"1N'/ c r:///1/l.)/ s7A17(y/7 ,2,,,r()a.e./) (/Ae 01'o,fs d /V.Z.LUi/one - 3.44/1V% G15/A7. 3 ci/t //rPV_CTA'/ 161/dL1) f'a%%r A S"/ L. 4/i//..s4- - 4.r/// '._5/4/6-5 ch'/NPv6 ky 77/ i 11�-'L/_) c-/'r_-7.J:r v L /2'7-/A/6- .c..u. ...�i 5. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATU BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . �/ f/) �% C^NE�Z/' �`( ` /2?e _ 2. 3. 4. STATE OF t'{f(20AY) ) This ins ument was ac nowledged before me this COUNTY OF Pi/UAL ) SS. day of , 19_I/ , by /ll .t1 ced m Y72sd'zL1 NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: my Commission Expires Feb. 10, 1983 STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by • NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ-31_84 where a zone change is proposed from GP Cen. Put alto CB-2 Caen Bust SW side of n wy 60 800 ' NW of Tomahawk Rd. 12 acre parcel (locatio B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. D:; We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband -AN and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons. J ;; t--4 °- 1 . Already have 2 centers within a 1 mile distance 4 0 0 2. Exc e 1 i gh t i ng &� � F- 3. Business next to private dwellings will reduce value of property sr L'J L 4• T,ncG of vn ew 5. Moved from city for country atmosphere. Po net want to lose it. 4 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) ,F;IGN A BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . Andrew B. Bigley 102 03 06104 Lot #7 2. Lorna A_ BiglAy �� lit _ - �,c;- 102 - 03 - 06104 " " 3. - - 4. STATE OF ) This instrument was ac owle, ged before me this C COUNTY OF (42ccc�Ztt )) SS. by _ t4:PA 542 ,,8 4 _J 19 �' All NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires May 31, 1988 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES• " ...... RUSSELL D MILLER 2500 WINDSOR MALL PARK RIDGE, IL 60068 ,_ --- ,:; ';-c. y:;:k:O.'' ''''.' el (()_ . - .i.-- -/ ),' / 6, aft-L. ,e.- -e,---,-1--C-76 ;L a....,,, ,./ e ,7-1 -9-14' -e, / $ / 17 Z - :3/_ 7- _7117 - 14- .L:.--"t{., 071. es*` 2'17,-7---x_. '):17„.„,a,,,- / 2, 4 ;tc_er-y1 _ ez,,t3.4—‘11- _ 4-?- -"?"-• i 72-71.e I-41- s _---/-et.---fri--e/ii, 6-2_,--- ,/ i // .44,7: ^- •Ar.---.,1---,(--,e.-4.7-e,e4 S S..._ Ort//%' , . _ rook . _ - ,11, ....is,st:44t*"-^1...;9tki:4-4.•-- --7-01 -' .::".---;,, -,--7-7" ' :-.f ----'-, -,--,-, • ' "- • • ,-,',-`'--..---f '.-':="-'•'-`,. --:..• ,.-•''-..n.,..%";, ...-, • •'•-, - r-,.•-..--.-.:.:::,..-:-,,,- - •. .77-_,.7-;-.:':::::',77:-"•.:•:,`---'i.--..-.---:•-- - '• • „.,_, ...,,,,,,,,..4<-4.,---... .1.---__-.1,-.t.e,t.1..-....,,,.-_----;•,=- ..P.--, - ' - -, - - - - - , - ,IJI t"• itramitE/30: ki""' -; ' '- ' - • ." , • . , -"--''''' 'PROPOSED REZO HEM NE EIENSuLlNIIMILIGROY, TO EVIMI..- ;•tINESS ME-a- - -_, ---- -.- -- • -_---. - ,, ------\ -4,-;.;---7,---.7 --t--__----7-..-.7-- - - ----,-..-- ,-----_,-- _ - ---N. - -- -PROPOSED-CI?..,i,•,,-kfi::-*t--‘ '-'''. • '-.----' --- r-- ss...---,-_;:.."--,--,•,',,; --..—"--.T::',...----_-_-7-Jry,,,,,,,':;„:;,,--,-7,2„-;--14,,ta:,:,:„,, :.,,,,,,:f. .1-:,. .:1---7-...:;z_-,, 'X13,-,-,,-2 i '/': - '1-1-*:-.4.'"A--*,,Z,1,7--,-f=" '--,--:-----",••=7,7 ..7-;-, :`,. - : - ---,- . • - - --,-- . :......•-•,,,--. - --.-_-„._z, i : i/ S ,A, - -,,- = . ,.. : .--.-_,..-,.... ,-..,....-.4.,-.;-7:4,.,-,..?;.. ..50w.....- •,..:. 1"-:"`-'7.i4..'. - • 7 -----"-.-Z'.-,--."-,:`.-.:-.'"F-^-:.__-, --."•r•-•,-------_------ „ _'....-',.. . -6, , .. / 0 , /i' ,----,--,_-•„;-::::'-.--z--,:-,..4..-------'--•:. .' --•:, -,'-.--4.3-• -,,',,.- .:•:-.--I'..i7-,f7Y••••-•=,'i x-,.'„'-';-.--;',":", - 7.':-.•-.:,______.' .--_,,,-_,-.77--,,,:_:-.-,ir.-i-_-_-.--77.:_=‘;'-,--,-,--",,-.;:':-"-----„,-.'' -- - -••-.-: , , 0% 41! / --: „ ---.;:,- ,bi-,--,=_-,,,.----4-, • .:.:7,-;j-;;'• "-f•-•.----'2•7''''',;:.,,';''::'-:''-'-^;''';:-'..----1 e -'''''''-'1':-'• - --to - --tj,..-;. --',-'1',.•• ••?;tir.•7.':, -.:i.%'..-.•.`.:'':. .--; --.._-:..:::.-..,.1: ._„, .....^,t,-•j,p,,..f..",, I . .._ . •; I i . :-.±o.s.:,,,.. . • --",•--y-':",--___.;_-_;;,..;:::7=-7-Y..------7--r:----:--_—_,:_-__:- ..-:,------•:_i--_,,.. -t,-,-.-, :- - - • __,,: . - _ ••_. ,..red,. , ..........,...._.crc__, I; . : .) . - N ,-::-.:---_-. -', ;..,, i-=-',"---_—;;::__..:__-r,,::-..7,------,,L,-. _-_-_-... --,:-: ' _ '.:: _=',:::' ". . _. .. - -- ... ' \. - -',:::''.-J.--- ':'-:,:- /Jr ',,...:-`....:.:•-,--." ,...'.-.':. '• I-i: .''; -,--vii,_ _- . : - ----- --- - - ' 111 a`///,'//// / /-` ,-*--'-‘ :-.-- - • --,'N.----,. , ..---;'-'-_,-...1 --t.--5 _ •- aL.,_ /1',//7 /1‘./. ..--, ;.‘‘,.,:'•' ;',..,- ''--, -, :',.-.' „ ,- '`-..:•;,...1:'::: :::;:i.,,',.._-...:',,:••-::: . . - //// /////:/, "..; ‘.,, '''. ;2:-• z, , .-.,,,' ""'-'---- , ME ' ,-/*,/////,/ / / " ' , - ' - '-.--,,_ - , ...;',:`1.-`- -,-",."•",' _ ;-',4-:,..7-.,:::',;72:;----11-,:--.3---:——.7.----:'---•--';-!-Ht----;-- JIM.' i' ' MIMI/,'. ' : '<" -_7, . - :....."-:_ ._. i', 1.„.„',.--.... - - .:-.--7-;--,-.•.-_:7.----- -,------ _,--_,: _-- . _ :•:-:•:-:.,-----. , : I -:. ... --7---..-- -;',-,:-;,_-_-.,';--:---_-.,-;-_-_-:- _:-.,,:•--:-=-7_,..-!2' , I i I ,.• .;-e, . , ''' ",....,... ---_:;.'';'-,:.''';', ' I I •:Snt::--,-,--.7,--....:,•!.....:-.,:•--7,,-""_!.=_.---1-..- .,._-_- A , ....,-,-., ---,-,•:--7.---_---.---:-,2.7----7- 7:::----_---r---:-:--- -- - 1 : .-•.'•-•:''-, -7:".',-•,-:--;': V s,.4 -,,,,,, .00110 :7• -..-7.:-,:-.•V."- ------777--,:.F.1------5,,„..---=-;-•---1-1-.,-,-:::„-.-7.,•_.-----:_, . _ . i mil i • i N 1 ‘,. .. _ r• . , .-11%.._... • ,_- - . •': - .- - -- • 1-SJ— lit a— .. ' .... --,-9. -----4,4*•4(4.0= ...r.A.;..t.ii•-•.,..--.,-.---,1_,?. . - ., •,---... --------::;_,-,._4=-.--';-,- --"',f- . • , - , . • .. rl _ 11111‘— _ .... . 1, Y -7 _ " - _ ._. -- .„-:,-..,..--,_ 1--:‘,..-,,„ ' i4 I .11111 IC I 1 I _ - E. KACH I : ';'' -- j I L _J _ - - SUBJECT SITE • N SCALE: 1"=300' Li LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) . •,-.:- -- •:•-•-.--_-_,.=.,-,,--•.s.,-,-.":„..,::_-.. .„-•.:- - . --.. .. ,. -..„ = ., r - -,. 4110"Tnr ORDINANCE NO. 289 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-31-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as. That part of the Southeast a of the Northeast 4 of Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, lying south of U.S. Highway 60-70-80-89, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the Southeast ; of the Northeast 1 of said Section 28, thence along a line perpendicular to the southwesterly line of Highway 80 to its intersection with said highway right-of-way line, thence northwesterly along the right-of-way line of said Highway 80 to its intersection with the north line of the Southeast a of the Northeast 1 of said Section 28; thence westerly along the north line of the Southeast ; of the Northeast a of Section 28 to the northwest corner of the Southeast 1 of the Northeast 1 of said Section 28, thence south along the west line of the Southeast 1 of the Northeast 4 of said Section 28 to the point of beginning, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM 4Davi ex er 4 City Attorney i ORDINANCE NO 289 PAGE TWO OF TWO 11.4". PZ-31-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 289 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO GENERAL BUSINESS (CB-2) r- - - - _---- - .-,.- - - -- -/ -- - - --- I // j \� // I I \\\ ' // I CB-2 / �' PROPOSED CR-5 // / \/ i/ I ii /Qst�/// \\ // I \/ � N N �/ PROPOSED NN.,..,� /j CB-1\ I N \' I N .. I S N NN i 60 0 \N / I 8p NN/f 89 EiLT2 \\ I II E. ESTE`jAN N I 1 I \ 'I lN I I r I r \ rCR- //N r 5 // / / CB-1 E. GRAN AA I. / 0 I 1 /7 I / I I // TH I / I / I I I / I E. HONDCI na / --J I I / it== - - / 1 1 cn / - - - - - ---II-CB-2 _.I 1 1E I I--=1 .. I 1 Q f I I I "_ 1 ICI-1 I E. KACH 11'JA I I SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1"=300' r 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) I_ I PQACHF✓o O a 4/ n,A ` . 1 gRIZUNp, `Oily c pache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 Approver for Agenda , Item 0 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading 'll7l Second Reading': THROUGH. ( A MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Public Hearing t101d Business FROM. CrCHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business Consent Agenda SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-41-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-41-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 304, is a request by the applicants Robert Christensen and Ronald and Anna May Williams through Keith Stachar to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a two-acre parcel developed with mobile homes and located at the northeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes and vacant land. Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Staff also recommends that this property not be allowed to develop into an RV or mobile home park, unless otherwise permitted by the City. There is a valid protest on file by Charles Salakin whose property lies to the north of the site. He owns 100% of the land within 150 feet on the north side and, therefore, approval of this rezoning requires a three-fourths vote of the City Council . 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 it ,... The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-41-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 304) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Jorgensen/Tepolt 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-41-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 304, application of Ronald and Anna May Williams and Robert Christensen for R. E. Christensen, Inc. for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited; except as otherwise permitted by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are- 1 . It is in accordance with the Medium Density General Plan designation. 2. It is a good use of the property. " CRN:mas PROTEST PETITION A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- where a zone change is proposed from GR.C/',21e urv�LtoT�t a; l�at _ E- . ram. 11 ``' location . L rr c.u5 e c,i B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse side of this petition. '� D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: 1 . •1 ^ s dt 2. ,1/1/`/� 3. i i ( (Wiv-s�_ - 1 ph j�7 474( 5. Cielf i aL- P 217�ZtZ —la _nth L -t - /✓e-e b4 d2' u COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) IGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. - - - 2. P 4. - - STATE OF l� • ) This instrumenttrJ was acknowledged before me this SS. 2 day of .'�,r� , 19� , COUNTY OF , ,,,.-,� ) by ,/ _ L, • / G ,,i,^T: i;}. i L,r� rr77n -,.1'Y L1, 1wf`/.�{y7 �� z1 (' NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: otrq N STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of AU r2 21,9 1984 , COUNTY OF ) by LiE C FLANNIN'' AND DEVELOPMENT NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. 1 PZ-41-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 304 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) xi- 5:17i71 �aad5 1:: I I --t-i'" 1 1 7. lti.i __, 1 _.:.•,, CR-5 1 -'at iq 7.75• j ,;!.!!,...,,.:,...,.::.1,. A R'' 1 ES V 3 ^5�.ly 7.�'z� _ ..,€'"xk fi�YE ' . sY,-r�.*",F .a;r.31Gc . 6 I µ IFUPOYET 1 TH 1 n 1 JEXISTING I II i----L CR-5 ° 1Q Q I I Icc II II I t--- CR-5 �I CR-4 u 1I 1 r it 1 c, 1 d i CDr II 1 C II •T--+ — - -- --_JI- - --, , 11 '/l SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: 1" = 000' I-J LII SITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) i AOIN ORDINANCE NO. 304 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-41-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as The North l: and the South } of the Southwest 1 of the Southwest 1 of the Northeast a of the Northeast A of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes; and 2) that the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av Alexan e City Attorney s PZ-41-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 304 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) I Amik I I I I 1 I 1 I r/ 1 1 1 CR-5 1 1 I I I 1 1- J //////i / 1 EAST SCENIC STREET I I TH I I EXISTING I CR-5 I 1 I----i I I I Q I I I I � ; 1 1 - II -1 v> I II I � 1 CR-5 I1 CR-4 I Q3 I I II I II I o I II I I II I L -- II i '// SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 200' II] LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES uj4;ti)1 "(1)- H v_ ITEM # 1 MEETING OF D / (� MOT ON BY: SECONDED BY ; )11- YES NO ABSTAINED CO U!` COUNCILr"AT! DAMIANO V €Q NC I i rnn N cTEELSM I-F VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN ItI L.L .MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED J ABSTAINED TOTAL /M ITEM NO . 14 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 289 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to cary; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 289 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 289 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , ZONING _ ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-31 -84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO . 14 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 289 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if teh vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 289 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . St^ 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 289 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-31 -84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL r PQACii O 1'' n..A U ' ,! .. 0 t.I r. Z \\\........., "IPIzo P (nly ob L 'iYache cunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 te Approver for Agenda rooktof item 0 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL First Reading/ Second Reading Y;,1.d /-5-' THROUGH: � % MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Public Hearing �; t Old Business FROM: dyCHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business Consent Agenda SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PZ-41-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 304) SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 - PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OCTOBER 16, 1984 - SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-41-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 304, is a request by the applicants Robert Christensen and Ronald and Anna May Williams through Keith Stachar to rezone their property from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) . The site is a two-acre parcel developed with mobile homes and located at the northeast corner of Scenic Street and Cactus Road in Section 21 . It is designated Medium/High Density Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes and vacant land. '^ Planning Department Comments Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Staff also recommends that this property not be allowed to develop into an RV or mobile home park, unless otherwise permitted by the City. There is a valid protest on file by Charles Salakin whose property lies to the north of the site. He owns 100% of the land within 150 feet on the north side and, therefore, approval of this rezoning requires a three-fourths vote of the City Council . 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Request for Agenda Item PZ-41-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 304) August 29, 1984 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their reoular meeting of August 28, 1984, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion• (M/S Jorgensen/Tepolt 6-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-41-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 304, application of Ronald and Anna May Williams and Robert Christensen for R. E. Christensen, Inc. for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the development of the site into an RV Park or mobile home park be prohibited; except as otherwise permitted by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It is in accordance with the Medium Density General Plan designation. 2. It is a good use of the property. " CRN:mas PROTEST PETITION 17 Z---�z--plc( A. We hereby rotest rezoning case PZ- where a zone change is proposed from ,[ e urv,Lto at - 1c !1 location 4 ve_, 5 lacl B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 2808 which is printed on the reverse Au.. side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons. 1 - P_,e__L4/_j_L.2zt_4_c_,S_ `61-.gil 0 (' 'Z t Airda.in pe.4--6,i-I,----c- — 1 if 2. ,1/11 p f, d___-fa� e ` ' (Y clef" !1 1-7 1< d. _ _ - _ 1 - A , i017 4. - i. _ . .. , OF ram. 7,17,7 5. ' . s. - Pe--.4 4 b4s . ch0 A - - - . i i . 2 � lllat- �1--_74111/7 —ia_ aW c7__I12 A27J —, Ne.e.d1_ s.�-r_a 1 T� COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) /' IGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . ail ) (4 le-S �? a l /G di ' .vc.A i c 2. _ - 4. - - — STATE OF S ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this SS. 23 day of rr��r,,r.. , 191( (/ COUNTY OF1v ) by / _ -,,,c,r-r,-,.:. ,- 4,1: rr-n -inv 27 198R .1- ....,/ -7, y - NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: CED ET-W ,ps STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of n}i r.,21-9 1ag4 , COUNTY OF ) by :i 9 C; PLANNIN. AND DEVELOPMENT NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: /'r► fr•-=e• I PZ-4I-84 PROPOSED ORDINANE Na NV PROPOSED REZONE FROM 'iR- GEIER LI RIRAU TO TRAILER HOMES I11W ZOINE i 1 W ew I Al r. fi ti - I ' i I I /f/r/, 1 t I CR-5 I a�; , , I 1 L. f yy /fj- i : '''".' Fr 7(/''.,'. " f. ..•---;---,,,fr.;iii744...f. .ri-;.•;,":7,, ii,,,,, ,-.,,. .f.-,P.-i',. .,:,:.-7-;::,2 i .r�li.If 1.Nni I I E 1tlI1" I 7 i U31i"»-I{[ } n, Q ! 1 A I 1 iI .• 1! --- -- o I cn (! ii I r II CR-5 II CR-4 I Q II I c) G I = 6 1I I I- T— II 1 0 C II 1 z II I 1 j---- - — —— — , --II_ ___. I 11 r SUBJECT SITE N SCALE: In = ZOO' 11_J 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINI]I'£r I ; 3OEMML MEP 4P,"":11!" oak oimik ORDINANCE NO. 304 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-41-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: /mik SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as. The North z and the South 1 of the Southwest A of the Southwest A of the Northeast A of the Northeast of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) that the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 /mik Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av Alexan e City Attorney / W"--s PZ-41-84 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 304 PROPOSED REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE (TH) r 1 1 1 1 I 1 I i I I 1 I CR-5 1 I I I 1 1 IVP 1 EAST SCENIC STREET J -- - -- `---I TRUP6SEI--1 I 1 TH I 1 EXISTING I CR-5 I 1 1 Q I I I CCI I ^ I I 11 I - CR-5 11 CR-4 1 I 1 I = 1 I I z I I I I I I L- - - -- - - ---1- ---� i SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. 1" = 200' 11J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES e)6 ITEM ,tJ p IIi MEETING OF / MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YE NO ABSTAINED CORNET' MANL\MIANO COIINCILr,AN HILL_ COLINC'Lf"AN TAYLOR bide-i L 4 _VICE MAYOR EIDSON -c111C TH MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 15 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND Step 1 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 304 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 304 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO . 304 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF a APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-41 -84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE ( TH) ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED . FOR APPROVAL Adook ITEM NO . 15 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 304 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry, if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 304 , BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE SECOND READING . S� 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT ORDINANCE NO. 304 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-41 -84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE ( TH ) ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS ; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED. FOR DENIAL LAW OFFICES DAVID K UDALL UDALL, SHUMWAY, BLACKHURST, MERLE M ALLEN,JR DALE R SHUMWAY ALLEN, LYONS 8 DAVIS, P C DENNIS P BLACKHURST JOHN H LYONS 30 WEST FIRST STREET TELEPHONE CHAR LES E DAVIS BARRY C DICKERSON MESA,ARIZONA 85201 AREA CODE 602 STEVEN H EVERTS 834-7200 CLARK R RICHTER GREGORY L MILES PETER W TAYLOR Approver for Agenda y JANIS SANDLER Item PAUL M BRACKEN Date. , 1► GREG R LORD /CA, October 9 , 1984 First Reading Second Reading Asolik Mr. Mike J. McNulty Public Hearing City Manager, Apache Junction Oid Business 1001 North Idaho Road New Business Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Consent Agenda Re: Superstition View Mobile Home Subdivision Dear Mr. McNulty: As you have requested, this letter will serve to update you, the Mayor, and the City Council on the steps taken by Mr. Pelfrey to resolve the dispute over the size of the alley on the eastern border of Mr. Pelfrey 's subdivision. As you recall , existing plans called for a 12 foot alleyway. After talking with you and several of the property owners adjacent to Mr. Pelfrey ' s subdivision, it became apparent that the main concern was property access to those who own land adjacent to the subdivision. Some of the homeowners felt that the 12 foot alleyway would not allow easy access to their property. In discussions with you and Mr. Broman, the City Engineer, you indicated that 20 feet would be the maximum acceptable .01.1\ width of an alley. With this in mind, we contacted the property owners to see if we could work out some type of solution which would allow for completion of the subdivision while alleviating the concern the owners had about accessing their property from the back of their lots . I and Cal Miller, who was the main spokesman for the property owners , spent numerous hours working on a solution. We believe that such a solution was reached, as far as humanly possible. We contacted as many of the property owners as possible. As you can well imagine, this was a difficult task in and of itself. In order to reach a solution, Mr. Pelfrey contacted Mountain Bell to see if the existing telephone closures which were sticking out into the alley could be moved four feet to the east so they would be up against the fences and thereby allow greater maneuverability within the alleyway. In a letter U DALL,SH UMWAY, BLACKHURST, ALLEN, LYONS 8 DAVIS, P C Mr. Mike J. McNulty October 9 , 1984 Page Two dated August 27 , 1984 , Mr. Pelfrey was notified by Mountain Bell that such would be done. For your reference I am enclosing a copy of that letter. Since then, Mr. Pelfrey has been notified the necessary permit has been obtained from the City of Apache Junction and that job order 4B-727 has been issued. The terminals are to be moved October 30 , 1984 . Additionally, Mr. Pelfrey proposed to enlarge the alley by moving his fence eight feet to the west thereby enlarging the alley to 20 feet. The reason that we proposed enlarging the alley to 20 feet was to allow easier mobility within the alleyway and easier access to the backs of the lots of Apache Sierra Mobile Home subdivision. In addition to this , Mr. Pelfrey offered to fix and replace several of the gates of property owners , at his own expense. An agreement was presented to the owners with this basic proposal . Our work produced the following information con- cerning lots 58 through 71 of the Apache Sierra Mobile Home Subdivision (the lots adjacent to Mr. Pelfrey ' s subdivision) : 1 . Mr. Brian owns lots 70 and 71. Our information indi- cates that Mr. Brian has been gone all summer and will not be back until sometime later in October. However, Mr. Brian does have a gate at the front of his lots which allows for access . To our knowledge, he has voiced no opposition, nor did he sign the petition. 2 . Lot #69 is owned by Mrs . Anderson. On September 2 , 1984 Mr. Pelfrey fixed the gate at the rear of her property at his own expense. Mrs . Anderson indicated that she would not sign anything. She indicated that she did not sign the peti- tion and that she did not want to become involved. As a result, she declined to sign the agreement offered by Mr. Pelfrey. 3 . Ms . Johnson owns lot #68 . While we have been unable to contact Ms. Johnson, Mr. Miller, the property spokesman, did indicate to us that she did not oppose the plan. 4 . Lot #67 and one half of lot 66 are owned by Mr. Dee Keller. Mr. Keller signed the agreement with Mr. Pelfrey and does not oppose the plan. 5. Lot #65 and one half of lot 66 are vacant and are for sale. Cal Miller did mention to us that this property is owned by his brother who lives in California. Amok UDALL, SHUMWAY, BLACKHURST, ALLEN, LYONS 8 DAVIS, P C Mr. Mike J. McNulty October 9 , 1984 Page Three 6. Lot #64 is owned by Mr. Cal Miller. He has signed the agreement and has agreed to the plan. Mr. Miller was very instrumental in resolving this dispute. AM bk 7 . Lot #63 is owned by Mr. Lyle Madison. Mr. Madison has signed the agreement and does not oppose the plan. 8 . Lot #62 is owned by Mr. Stokley. Apparently, Mr. Stokley does oppose the plan (see further discussion below) . 9 . Lot #61 is owned by Mr. Lowe. Mr. and Mrs . Lowe did sign the petition, however, they have since signed the agree- ment with Mr. Pelfrey and do agree to the plan. 10 . Lot #60 is owned by Mr. Hatfield and although he and his wife did sign the petition they have also since signed the agreement with Mr. Pelfrey and do not oppose the agreement. 11. Lot #59 is owned by S . Cluck. To this date we have been unable to contact anyone at the residence. However, no one from this residence has signed the petition in opposition to the subdivision. 12 . Lot #58 is owned by Mr. Jim Termine. Again, we have been unable to contact Mr. Termine other than on one occasion. On that occasion there did not appear to be any opposition to the subdivision. Again, he did not sign the petition. Amok There are then 12 property owners with whom we have been trying to deal in reaching the settlement. Of those 12 , only five signed the petition against the subdivision. Of those five, four have since changed and have signed an agreement with Mr. Pelfrey. To date, there appears to be opposition from only one property owner. Mr. Stokley is an elderly man with whom it has been very difficult to deal . His wife died recently and he has placed blame for this upon Mr. Pelfrey. I did look at some medical records which indicated Mrs . Stokley was suffering from acute emphysema and acute asthma along with several other ailments . Mr. Stokley himself also suffers from the effects of a stroke. For these reasons it has been impossi- ble to rationally discuss the matter. Recently, we learned that he would sign the agreement if we would put in a brand new, and larger, gate on the back of his lot. Enclosed for your UDALL, SHUMWAY, BLACKHURST, ALLEN, LYONS 8 DAVIS, P C Mr. Mike J. McNulty October 9 , 1984 Page Four reference is a letter which I sent to Mr. Stokley. As of the date of writing this letter I have not received any return correspon- dence from Mr. Stokley. The offer which we have made to Mr. Stokley remains open: Mr. Pelfrey will , at his expense , install a brand new sliding gate should Mr. Stokley sign the agreement. In any event, we have been able to reach agreement with the rest of the owners of Apache Sierra Mobile Home Subdivision with lots adjacent to Mr. Pelfrey 's subdivision. We believe we have tried our best to reach a solution and we believe that the present solution is satisfactory inasmuch as it satisfies the concerns of the property owners and still allows for the planned subdivision. I believe one more item needs to be addressed. As we dis- cussed, the vast majority of the persons who signed the petition do not live adjacent to the subdivision. I suppose they live some- where in the surrounding area. While visiting the site on one occasion several ladies drove up and voiced their displeasure. In trying to explain the solution to them they were adamantly opposed. There was no compromise , they didn ' t want a larger alley. They wanted a 30 foot road. While this does not affect the solution of providing easier access to adjacent property owners , I do want you to know there is apparently some opposition from somewhere. As you well know in your position, one is never able to please everybody, but we believe under the present circumstances we have made a good faith effort to equitably settle the problem. If there is any other information which you should desire, please do not hesitate to let us know. I have sincerely appreciated the cooperation which we have received from the City of Apache Junction. We believe that the Superstition View Mobile Home Subdivision fits well within the master plan for Apache Junction. We believe that the present solution of enlarging the alley to 20 feet and moving existing telephone clo- sures satisfies those parties involved while still remaining within the desired development structure of the City. Should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours , 0/4 A "----67,t464--- aul M. Bracken PMB:hb Enc. gel Mountain Bell August 27, 1984 Bill Pelfrey 1617 N. 32nd St. Phoenix, Arizona 85008 Dear Sir; Mountain Bell is currently working on a job which will relocate existing telephone closures located on the east side of Desert View Rd. from 12th Ave. to 16th Ave. , (T1N,R8E SEC 30) 4' east of the current location. This work will require a City of Apache Junction permit. Upon acceptanr? and engineering, the job will be distributed to our outside work forces. Sin ely, J 6-)`-m,‘r-X-- Donna Monday (Technical Assistant-Mountain Bell Engineering) Am. „A !1 LAW OFFICES§ DAVID K UDALL UDALL, SHUMWAY, BLACKHURST, MERLE M ALLEN,JR DALE R SHUMWAY ALLEN, LYONS 8 DAVIS, P C. DENNIS P BLACKHURST JOHN H LYONS 30 WEST FIRST STREET TELEPHONE CHARLES E DAVIS AREA CODE 602 uARHr C DICKERSON MESA,ARIZONA 85201 STLVLN H EVENTS 034 7200 I:LARK R RICHTER C.REGOHY L MILES October 4 , 1984 PETLH W TAYLOR JANIS SANDLER PAUL M BRACKEN GREG H LORD CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. George D. Stokely 1504 South Desert View Place Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Stokely: As you may remember I represent Bill Pelfrey who is the developer of Superstition Mobile Home subdivision which is adjacent to your property. Lyle Madison has mentioned to Mr. Pelfrey that you would like to settle the dispute over the alley. As I have told you on other occasions Mr . Pelfrey would be willing to put in a lar- ger gate for you to make it easier for you to get in and out of the property. Should you desire to settle this dispute, I have enclosed an Agreement which provides that Mr. Pelfrey will dedicate an additional eight foot strip to the City of Apache Junction for alley and utility use. If this agreement meets with your satisfaction please print your name at the top and put in your street address under para- graph number 2 and then sign the agreement at the bottom. Mr. Pelfrey will then install a 20 foot sliding gate, at Mr. Peifrey` s expense, similar to that of your neighbor, Lyle Madison. For your convenience I am enclosing a self-addressed stamped envelope to return the document to me. Should you have any questions you may desire to consult your at- torney . Over the past several months we have attempted on numerous occasions to settle this dispute. We believe en- UDALL, SHUMWAY, BLACKHURST, ALLEN, LYONS 8 DAVIS, P C Page Two larging the alley by an additional eight feet and offering to install a new fence for you at Mr. Pelfrey ' s expense is equitable . Should you decide to sign the agreement, once it is returned to me Mr. Pelfrey will have the new gate in- stalled. Sincerely , ---POALNAADr."414P.--- Paul M. Bracken PMB/slg Encl; .-. A AGREEMENT b tween WILLIAM D. PELFREY (PELFREY) and WI Jei i LL, L' ' (OWNER) . 1 . PELFREY owns certain real property located in Apache Junction near 16th Avenue and Desert View, the true legal description being: The East half of the West half of the South- east quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 30 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Merl- ^ dean , Pinal County, Arizona EXCEPT the North 396 feet thereof. 2 . OWNER owns property adjacent to the above described property, being separated by a dedicated alley, the true address being \5 7_) ; \ )C -,)Q-tit \j 1 (Lc,w p(& cQ 3 . This Agreement is conditioned upon Mountain Bell moving the existing telephone closures presently located in the alleyway four (4) feet to the east as evidenced by the attached letter (Exhibit "A") . 4 . A dispute has developed over the size of the alley separating the properties of PELFREY and OWNER and the parties desire to resolve the dispute and avoid costly litigation and attorney' s fees . The parties agree as follows: 1 . To provide OWNER a larger alley and easier access to OWNER' s property , PELFREY will dedicate an eight (8) foot strip of land from the eastern boundary of the above described property to the City of Apache Junction for alley and utility use. 2 . OWNER relinquishes and releases any and all claims to the above described property of PELFREY and agrees to execute any documents or instruments necessary to carry out this Agree- ment. Dated this 21 day of , 1984 . 4/t ' illiam D. Pe fret' �/ r7 pmb2f //'� AGREEMENT between WILLIAM D. PELFREY (PELFREY) and i�4/KJN _is . # �-+1 Al /lt ater (OWNER) . 1 . PELFREY owns certain real property located in Apache Junction near 16th Avenue and Desert View, the true legal description being : The East half of the West half of the South- east quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 30 , Township .•. 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meri- dian , Pinal County, Arizona EXCEPT the North 396 feet thereof. 2 . OWNER owns property adjacent to the above described property, being separated by a dedicated lie , th true address being _4_444 5- Prier-4 r4 I rAd• f'l. � � � � �S Z.Zd. 3 . This Agreement is conditioned upon Mountain Bell moving the existing telephone closures presently located in the alleyway four (4) feet to the east as evidenced by the attached letter (Exhibit "A" ) . 4 . A dispute has developed over the size of the alley separating the properties of PELFREY and OWNER and the parties desire to resolve the dispute and avoid costly litigation and attorney' s fees . The parties agree as follows: 1 . To provide OWNER a larger alley and easier access to OWNER' s property , PELFREY will dedicate an eight (8) foot strip of land from the eastern boundary of the above described property to the City of Apache Junction for alley and utility use. 2 . OWNER relinquishes and releases any and all claims '... to the above described property of PELFREY and agrees to execute - any documents or instruments necessary to carry out this Agree- ment. Dated this .2.3 day of Sra &rrr Aer , 1984 . 7/2 ( , i', /Le/(,(,,,,.. 9 (1_,`,.- William D. Pelfrey \\ /it I( ./it' 1 7/37,e_11// —� c , , /./r /2 44 ti f / pmb2f AGREEMENT between WILLIAM D. PELFREY (PELFREY) and /M/ 5 4AI) (OWNER) . 1 . PELFREY owns certain real property located in Apache Junction near 16th Avenue and Desert View, the true legal description being : The East half of the West half of the South- east quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 30 , Township .-. 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meri- dian , Pinal County, Arizona EXCEPT the North 396 feet thereof. 2 . OWNER owns property adjacent to the above described property, being separated by a dedicate alley, the true address being / 57,O /••.144t `/11 '1 /✓1��C�' �" 3 . This Agreement is conditioned upon Mountain Bell moving the existing telephone closures presently located in the alleyway four (4) feet to the east as evidenced by the attached letter (Exhibit "A" ) . 4 . A dispute has developed over the size of the alley separating the properties of PELFREY and OWNER and the parties desire to resolve the dispute and avoid costly litigation and attorney' s fees . The parties agree as follows : 1 . To provide OWNER a larger alley and easier access to OWNER' s property , PELFREY will dedicate an eight (8) foot strip of land from the eastern boundary of the above described property to the City of Apache Junction for alley and utility use. 2 . OWNER relinquishes and releases any and all claims to the above described property of PELFREY and agrees to execute any documents or instruments necessary to carry out this Agree- ment. Dated this Z7 day of 4`441 , 1984 . i �, QQ// William D. Pelfrey pmb2f AGREEMENT between WILLIAM D. PELFREY (PELFREY) and Lya (OWNER) . 1 . PELFREY owns certain real property located in Apache Junction near 16th Avenue and Desert View, the true legal description being : The East half of the West half of the South- east quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 30 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meri- dian , Pinal County, Arizona EXCEPT the North 396 feet thereof. 2 . OWNER owns property adjacent to the above described property, being separated by a dedicated alley, the true address being /4 V i ter- viQc-J 3 . This Agreement is conditioned upon Mountain Bell moving the existing telephone closures presently located in the alleyway four (4) feet to the east as evidenced by the attached letter ( Exhibit "An) . 4 . A dispute has developed over the size of the alley separating the properties of PELFREY and OWNER and the parties desire to resolve the dispute and avoid costly litigation and attorney' s fees . The parties agree as follows : 1 . To provide OWNER a larger alley and easier access to OWNER' s property , PELFREY will dedicate an eight (8) foot strip of land from the eastern boundary of the above described property to the City of Apache Junction for alley and utility use. 2 . OWNER relinquishes and releases any and all claims to the above described property of PELFREY and agrees to execute any documents or instruments necessary to carry out this Agree- ment. Dated this z Z day of SE Ai , 1984 . eim le_0(7) _ William D. Pelfrey pmb2f n ,AGREEMENT between WILLIAM D. PELFREY (PELFREY) and JL�r V(_L[_-L.P_ (OWNER) . 1 . PELFREY owns certain real property located in Apache Junction near 16th Avenue and Desert View, the true legal description being: The East half of the West half of the South- east quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 30 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meri- dian , Pinal County, Arizona EXCEPT the North 396 feet thereof. 2 . OWNER owns property adjacent to the above described property, being separated by a dedicated alley, the true address being '9l4 , 111:_�jj i ., i (i. t0 '()LjAcC-= 14 ti--/ .• tatt.) 0f [�c-, . 3 . This Agreement is conditioned upon Mountain Bell moving the existing telephone closures presently located in the alleyway four (4) feet to the east as evidenced by the attached letter (Exhibit "A" ) . 4 . A dispute has developed over the size of the alley separating the properties of PELFREY and OWNER and the parties desire to resolve the dispute and avoid costly litigation and attorney' s fees . The parties agree as follows : 1 . To provide OWNER a larger alley and easier access to OWNER' s property , PELFREY will dedicate an eight (8) foot strip of land from the eastern boundary of the above described property to the City of Apache Junction for alley and utility use. 2 . OWNER relinquishes and releases any and all claims .•. to the above described property of PELFREY and agrees to execute any documents or instruments necessary to carry out this Agree- ment . Dated this Z day of S -V1 Q t4lt;L-!L , 1984 . / /, , William D. Pelfrey /72i ) -„!-,.. / -,-,.2z2-,,,//71 -2/:-/If pmb2f ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES4 Am\ 1 \1P)IC • I (tjl)F 0/ f: ITEM ## ( fo MEETING OF � 4P MOTION BY: PI/1111SECONDED BY: J;)14-'' Y S NO ABSTAINED COTNCTI MANIY MIANO COUNCILMAN_ELL I COIINC I LEAN TAYLOR _ I .:f tfNC FLP9 JIfF MAYOR EIDSON _thOttNC I LMtft -sTCELg1 TI4 - MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMUS ,! IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • ►, ITEM NO. 16 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONTINUED PROCESSING OF THE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SUPERSTITION VIEW MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION BE AND HEREBY I$ APPROVED 'CB: (Cry CHE✓G20 c0 '`IRIZONP........", ity a �co �� unction October 15, 1984 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: City Manager ' � > ,o FROM: Building Official RE: Pueblo R.V. Resort/Final Approval Pursuant to the provisions of Section 33.03 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the above project has been reviewed and found to be in compliance for final approval and is, therefore, forwarded for Council action. LF:sw Approver for Agenda Jv !-' Date Item # First Reading J ...., /(c A Second Reading Public Hearing ,IL Old Business ,..1,_ New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 /'N C— ITEM NO. 16b BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APCHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE FINAL PLAT FOR PUEBLO R.V. RESORT BE AND HEREBY IS (APPROVED) (DENIED) . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • MMI UWIMMINFAIT PAUM , _ • ITEM # MEETIidG OF POTION BY : SECONDED BY : .1:0 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNtt"AN STEEL 1. NCILTA S� NANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNC I LMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN DAMIANO /ICE fAYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AI\ Ill iPgACHFJG O ! 4'' 'IRiz,, �D it? 4 �:-rodi ace unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL -7' ) THROUGH: j'3'MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: `' n4 CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING t. SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 APPOINTMENT TO SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE AND/OR ANNEXATION COMMITTEE The Subdivision and Annexation Committees both have a vacancy due to resignations. A News Release was sent to the newspapers on August 6, 1984 and again on August 28, 1984 requesting Talent Bank applications for these committees. One application was received from the first release. We are are hopeful that enough are received from the second release to appoint new committee members. At this time, we are requesting that, if possible, new members be appointed to both of these committees. Recommended Motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that be appointed to fill the vacancy on the (Subdivision) (Annexation) Committee. CRN:mas Approver for Agenda Item # _Diaz First Reading 2 -�42___ Second Reading _L;_ Public Hearing .3 Old Business _ New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 eN ON PQACHE ✓o ,47:Als-i,/1/.0 ow '1,9rzoP' Vily o 0 pac!2e 22Z17iO22 TALENT BANK APPLI CATI ON FOR BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE / DATE. /6/// C / 71 Nr12E: P'��/ TELEPHONE: 90727 5C,5 (home) 1 7 ���, (office ADDRESS: ? ' : 4/( 7 �7l_, Z— 7 ZIP CODE: - X OCCUPATION. _ i'GJL./ � .9'O (if re red, please ate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: /7 �' z'�` T �. � � 7:LPROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO UNITY ACTIVITIES: .-44 f 024, r ADDITI NAL PERTINENT NFOP.MA ION/R FERENCES. _e%) 42 %_ , 6, r e e NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. r7 ,•---Kai i -r--:°. Revised 6/19/31 ,/Signature of Applicant (.../ 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE J04CT!C)N 4217/w4 xa-,^n . Tct CPun..c JACK V. LEE, Appraiser lace Phoenix, Arizona 85U'1L (b62}--249-=9'M 7 e3 L- ;; 72 QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISE C� 35 years in Real Estate -- 33 years Licensed Real Estate Broker. Attended Phoenix College, taking courses in Real Estate Law; Investment Consulting; Appraising Residential, Condemnation Valuation, Industrial (Heavy) , Income Property, Valuing Land, Recreational, Commercial and Ranches; and other related Real Estate courses. Member of Phoenix Real Estate board; National Association of Real Estate Boards; Independent Fee Appraisers; Legislative Committee for the Independent Fee Appraisers. Approved by Conventional Banks, Savings & Loan Associations, Insurance Companies, Mortgage Companies, Finance Companies. Court Approved Expert Witness, etc. Real Estate Consulting, Investments and Appraising have been my profession continuously for 35 years and the profession of my Mother and Step-Father, A. D. McClain Realty Company, who were in business in the State of Arizona since 1929. Partial List of Clients: American Finance Corporation Household Finance Corporation Postal Finance Corporation Beneficial Finance Nationwide Financial Corporation C.I.T. Financial Services Union Home Loans Arizona Central Credit Union Hughes Airwest Credit Union Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. Arizona Telco Federal Credit Union DeVelco Manufacturing Company Scottsdale Country Club (Ramada Inns) John Long multiple property Remuda Guest Ranch, Wickenburg Wells Fargo Credit Corporation A partial list of Attorneys includes: Jennings, StLouss and Salmon; Dallas Richardson; Jay & Warner Sorenson; Burch, Cracchiolo; Judge J. Howard Thompson, and others. Jack V Lee - Appraiser a 1 J.41.4u011•T 'U Phoenix, Arizona ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES )ifixo;frt 4S(1) ITEM # 1/1 MEETI►dG OF 0 MOTION BY: (a Sem SECONDED BY: 4)11/ YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS _COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR 1/./ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ,VICE f"AYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE ✓ UNANIMOUS 1 IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Am. monk ITEM NO . 17 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COU CIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT 1a. ��QJ _ BE APPOINTED TO THE ANNEXATION COMMITTEE AND MAW SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE. .�► Aft. ?ACHE ✓G2 O0 v �< � � �z �R,ZoNP �oit� a� pacheunction October 3, 1984 Asoilk MEMORANDUM TO: THE H)NORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: PAMELA LOUI, LIBRARY DIRECTOR - A- / SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - OCTOBER 16, 1984 APPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY BOARD Margaret Hammer has resigned from the Library Board. Although talent bank applications have not been submitted to the City Clerk at this writing, a couple of individuals have expressed their interest in being appointed to fill the vacancy on the Library Board. It is expected that at least two applications will be on file by the October 16 City Council meeting. At the October 2, 1984, Library Board meeting, Board Member Jan Hiller stated that former Board Member Ruby Forsberg wishes to be reappointed to the Library Board. No official Board action was taken for a formal recommendation. If no applications are filed with the City Clerk's office by the October 16, 1984, City Council meeting, a formal Amok notice of the Library Board vacancy will be placed in the appropriate newspapers. Approver for Agenda Date Item # • First Reading Second Reading Public Hearing ._ Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 8/31/84 natft Conne . J have .taken a fa.GC--time ,ov,j.c.iwn ad V iuntee2 Coo/Iduudoi7 ,.y}h VL4 Z, and And -that .i wELL no ionge2 be a&e ,io u,J my du .ce4 ad a member (4 -the Lc6,taity L3vaicd t) "bum-teed. .tAerzePae .iendea. mc� n.eda_gnaA4 on, a_i o .t1a4 date. "/"- vh.et, ri copy ram Locu. O� PeACH` G\ 4iL0�// SG'?�#2/ o G JG2Cr22 1L7,:;,o2032 TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR A./',3RRRy BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE f DATE: /0-3-/V N 'f.F.: 6-7RrLy 4. D04k TELEPHONE. _ ge-,?7.r,? (home) r3� •/S .L 'T 3o(offic ADDRESS. 2Zo6S iil £OLGALDT .�; � /1r ZIP CODE' - �.5.7.?o OCCUPATION: /k 1.,J6 7 (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: H/G#/ Je/,tooL GRWDcht4le... eNete_AyEA,e /�/ .U.s.inlAts a(�r- . PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ajo,P/lfn co R, 44 .SE-4'/A/EZ. AS OFFrea M�vhGise ,rope, o V�✓2 hl y res ia/4-EE o r cor.�rv�c All/ / ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES• //o,JE.s i �FpE,w),1BLE e s%kic. i;l r. NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction znd that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. //%Ge., ."'rs' 4......_•....--1 � Revised 6/ 19/S 1 Si;,.iature oL/ AppLicant tool NCRTH IDAr,O CAD • APACHE JU'JC'r'J Avi7r`LJa acw, - -- -•- PQACHE✓G O ti0 U 1 ' yZ gRizONP amity o f C pe c hie 2unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR X • ' BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: ." , ./i Icigo NAME: Ftc ✓ /l7, ': t S ,A e, i- �1 TELEPHONE: `7.r - C/ ,S Y� (home) Al/ ci r>2 - / 4� / (office) 9f ADDRESS: 1/ /1/t /1'C_ !/ S'��'G" ZIP CODE: $ � r OCCUPATION: C1 ��/ c� �__ /�t'� ?4 �;''/� f"i, /� /3 / - 1-, y` !! Ni (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) `2c,„" EDUCATION: //,ry S /J j PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: (° / c, c !1 / / S, t — — (. L) t9�1--,. 1) `i-1 t— e /1<, / /!/ f / r s — ._) C+ i--c ,._7 �:.i1,2 7 , I FEEL THAT I A}M- QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE ' .-1 / , r' / :" L_ i' 1'Lt 'VA..I /00\ ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: C,n / / //' 4 :, 5 <- ,., NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. _/, ‘_, Signature of Applicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE`(602)982-6154 Auk ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • p , � v ITEM # l MEETING OF f MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 0140 YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FIDSON I L AB' nTtCI CM TT11 j _Cutritl /f COUNC I LMfAN TAYLOR V , COUNCILMAN HILL -eerdNCtLM N SHANK&— ,COUNCILMAN DAMIANO _MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL _ p ITEM NO. 18 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MARGARET HAMMER FROM THE LIBRARY BOARD , BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET . ILL/BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT BE APPOINTED TO THE LIBRARY BOARD TO FILL THE VACA Y CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF MARGARET HAMMER , SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30 , 1985 . PQptcHE✓o O I O� L-:-.1 -( i O , , ' O ., f lr;r I�PlZONP !/ity o� Lipaclie unction October 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Ai, THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK Ai SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR TOWN HALL PUBLIC FORUM Councilwoman Shanks has requested that the Council consider a program of Town Hall Public Forums to be held four times throughout the year. The first of these forums would be held in November 1984, with the others to be spaced approximately four months apart -- March 1985, July 1985 and November 1985. The first forum would have no specific agenda, but would be held to listen to citizen requests, complaints, recommendations, etc. Procedural rules such as the overall length of the forum and length of speaker time will have to be established. A large, centrally-located facility would be used such as the high school cafetorium. Councilwoman Shanks has also suggested that the citizens be encouraged to submit ideas for agenda items for future public forums. If the Council wishes to have such a meeting in November, it is recommended that a date be selected at this time so that arrangements can be made for a facility and press releases prepared. kmc Approver for Agenda_ D,te Item # First Reading , ' _ Second Reading Public Hearing _ Old Business V New Business Consent Agenda •001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 R CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 6-)A„," ITEf 1 MEETING OF 60// MOTION BY ; SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED -004i4E I Lt°*N ! COUNCILMAT! DAMIANO , MITH V!I CE MAYOR EIDSON CO UNC I LMAN TAYLOR IMMINININIS COUNCILMAN lKI LL .MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ,ram ,is ITEM NO . 19 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A TOWN HALL PUBLIC FORUM BE HELD ON , AT IN THE mesa Community Council 21 South Hibbert,Suite 310 / Mesa,Arizona 85202 • (602)8347777,Ext 441 Approver for Agenda Date Item # First Reading September 12 , 1984 Second Reading 1 9 d I OFFICERS Public Hearing �a,+c Hash Old Business New Business Ja.+teKnufit Consent Agenda v,rc Ac,e4dkna caLcsdm6u Mr. Wendell Clarke, Mayor City of Apache Junction acf Page Tner- net 1001 North Idaho Road oF Apache Junction, AZ 85220 c ticrr�s e Dear Mayor Clarke: kita.re-lug tivt9a4. cA- eusch Over the past several months , our three year effort to r ' .Lux C00pci` establish a comprehensive behavioral health system for the Jch`Otanctaa East Valleyhave greatlyintensified. Representatives from uF�e. E�+ctt p,yrag.,ttonF G4.ac East Valley communities , such as Marie Shanks from your &wit CurrieLL city, have met to organize and discuss how to best develop P` `t�u� an organization that would assure the highest degree of ra,. J &thenwow citizen involvement in local decision making relative to the ZabeAt funding and delivery of behavioral health services . Your R"`hR,aArt assistance, as Mayor of one of our East Valley communities , Tom/ is now requested. big To establish an East Valley Behavioral Health Administrative Mamma Entity, each Mayor in the East Valley is being asked to ap- mzam point one ( 1) local community representative to serve as a foundinc member on that Board of Directors . These six (6) individuals will develop articles of Incorporation, By-laws and a set of responsibilities and functions for the new Administrative Entity. Please let us know the individual you have appointed at you earliest conveniece . I do plan to call these six community representatives together sometime next week. If an official appointment cannot be confirmed that quickly, United Way J., Page 2 would you please notify us of the "prospective" individual . In that way, your representative would not miss our first meeting, and could be "officially" appointed at a later date. If you have any further questions relative to this en- deavor, please contact Marie Shanks , or Dr. William Griffor at the Mesa Community Council (834-7777 Ext. 441) . Please send your reply to me at: Mesa Community Council 21 South Hibbert Mesa, AZ 85202 We look forward to working with your community in this most exciting endeavor. Sincerely, Al.\44// *,ki . J n Kerr M.D. , Chairman East Valley Behavioral Health Task Force JK/emu cc : Marie Shanks Michael McNulty 13911 CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES PP)// L/ A:$51 I W o ITEM II421 /11/..// MEETING OF 1 � 9 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: kW YEE NO ABSTAINED V COUNCILMAN TAYLOR • ` COUNCILMAN HILL VICE_MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO _MAYOR_ CLARKF UNANIT^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL \j/( Ask ITEM NO . 20 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT BE APPOINTED AS A FOUNDING MEMBER OF THE EAST VALLEY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH TASK FORCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITY . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET , NOTES 0/15,kuiv v ITEM # 9A143m MEETING OF 6 MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : )14041/ YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTTSON . -C$C 1t -Ltitit tTEtL-71717 .COUNCILMAN1 TAYLOR . COUNCILMAN Hit L V - OUNCILMAN aAMIANO ✓ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL it .m. 1110 ITEM NO. 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER IS AUTHORIZED TO NOTIFY THE CENTRAL ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS THAT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION WILL REMAIN WITHIN THE CENTRAL ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS CATCHMENT AREA FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH. Oink pini. PeP. •CHF✓G It, II , O U t�K tt' -1R,'zoNP `Oily 4L pache unction October 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER `_ l FROM: CITY CLERK Voedl SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION, ARTICLE 9-2 OF THE CITY CODE In accordance with the Apache Junction City Code, Article 9-2, Mrs. Rose Thompson of 1620 S. Plaza Drive has requested an additional 30 to 45 days to bring her property into compliance with city regulations. Attached is the letter from Mrs. Thompson requesting such an extension and pictures of the property in question. This item will appear on the October 16th agenda for your action. kmc Approver for Agenda Date ,Item # First Reading _` 'c / Second Reading_ ��- Public Hearing -~ - Old Business New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 r eL± 19-49.3y c-Kyh& ouu, Ojr&a,-v-Wyudis (c)- AA_.) e-cLa /z,v3 uOttO .fyy\.,Ar_ 0-')( 0•Q_ .- PrY.Lc2e-k--->ku<;, da-WN ./ QD Lstr _Q_ oLtgLctJya avo,. u4) - \ /W-A.c\tvy\ies toa - J - ,.........., 3 ) ,..c•I u ) N.... . 1 , , 1.--Zs; C:•'.. ,....) %,.‘ s,.. •••- I , .'I' c"••........... I ' ' i‘. , i:x. t t r\! p rn J , , 1 : , 1 / I ‘4s,.. ...,,A,' C) ."'C.-. C—) C\.-) .'' • ....) I ,-- 1 , ) 6 rf) ,04 , t ' i' Gs ,i • A,„:.:;',.,:',.'..,.':.,,:. • . • e, .•, . — , ti••• . - f . . 1 , 11•• ••.4.',.1,-,1?,:.r.: . , .. C '•"' ',V W.,,'..!,,i•g--.44.,' i • ri* 1, • 4. i,...' •irr-t:o . 'c .. '.v •-•• ••,•,.V.'1!:,•'",:,”. i , . '.;,';'?•.7,•;':,:.,:.•:',.i I si.,•14., ' or •,..4 ,v„,,••,;.,,,r„.„.„. , ?!#i, ,- ‘ , • • , ,z. ;:-.T. , 4.- ./ i‘ • i ' k iiv 1 , •, ...;•• , .,, '50f): . .1 4011 •. t t :,"'.. 1 ' •'11*0 ..,•/i,..:-:,:,: i i . frit i , ,..„.,,,,;-..,, k•,,. . ... . . • 7 I, * ,to',. c. 4 4 •ro. I . .41. is. . l• '!..,. • ,:',•tf•c•'-' • ' q . --- r• ., ' 17, r i• . 7; '.1,: 1 t 41.'141111 1' V.:: • 4 — .Y':, frri . . • i 5.4.,-,, d . .•''ok. .. • ' ...ef'' . ' 4: ,,,,, • orstgli ,,,„ . , ;"is . '';;•'!.', I.,t‘e,: .it:• '; • •.:'''5,i;','l'-'4-'....';''' . ' 7,11kt . ...1. 4 .,,,,,,.. . 9; c..,•••.4 ,. • 'GI,!„3.1 0 ,' ,V .1 ‘.., 'I —''' 1;• •• '•'.,..4 qt.. c. •'' , ,...., v . ,. , •e. , lI 4 , • >4 1 ' 1% t ' 4 k •?A.:...,L..:; ...i. .?„-.1:,,2,4„..1, 7;,-.,.. r,,,..4:,. . • ', -..., i .t,' il '1 i ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / if 411 ^ _ I 5 ITEM # MEETING OF 411) MOTION BY : SECONDED BY ; C(,► SSA' YES NO ABSTAINED COMIC I1 MANDAMIANO 1 COUNCILP1AIL ILL v COUNC HYLAIL TAYLOR I Lt N- S 1kMKS / �[ILF MAYOR EIDSON v �� ,,TCCLS(1I TM. MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ink Ask r` ' p C=!'z ITEM NO . 21 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A TIME EXTENSION TO COMPLY WITH ARTICLE 9-2 OF THE CITY CODE OF 3 Ln DAYS BE GRANTED TO MRS . ROSE THOMPSON , TO EXPIRE 5 �10 PQACHE ✓ el (...'" ..._,. tv U wt:"'f O Z •" 'qP/ZOO' CO.iL o pache cOunclion .•. October 11, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: 1 / CITY MANAGER ✓: SUBJECT: REQUEST TO HIRE ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN AND POLICE OFFICER The City's budget provides for the positions of Engineering Technician and Police Officer to be hired in January. Because of the increase in workloads in both departments, I am requesting that we be permitted to hire both positions as soon as possible. I believe that both departments will be able to fund these positions from salary savings. MJMc/jtl 1 I /2 Approver for Agenda f Da a item # 1 /0 / i D2c2' First Reading Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business ✓ New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0) ))) .•. (9/ 1 .)t)itv c? - .7;2/ ITEf1 # MEETING OF & MOTION BY: JO/M-1/ SECONDED BY: 44/ YES NO ABSTAINED - - - COUNCILMAN HILL 1116111111111111111111 COUNCILMAN TAYLOR Nam . COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MIMMINIMEMI /ICE f'.AYOR EIDSON IIINEMEMINIE MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL Amer Aft. ITEM NO . 22 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO ACCELERATE THE HIRING OF ENGINEERING AIDE AND POLICE OFFICER . ..... A-. ( ' f• lif I ( met- ( ( ifr ( riri ) )20 AtCe--7c4Z /64)/7--ezzA,Z, 02) °X3 Ata& I., e..144e, \ , 1 z& d,--,---,:it_ 5) t-A ' ca--7-6- ) lk id ,C,if /6 ht-g-4) Jr 6`) /7- --st \ \ \\\\ ald-elp--6-4 Vi4--29 4---td2;62)a4--e-)6P---4-47- Cm"."111111"' r."1"1111°. Ank Amok PQACHE ✓G q,� Piitz o ipache c2unction izo� ... October 16, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAY R AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ' y1 FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: NOMINATION PROCEDURES The City Council has previously adopted Robert's Rules of Order in conjunction with procedural matters. As such, the Council is obligated to abide by the provisions of Robert's Rules for the nomination of council members. The following provisions of Robert's Rules pertain to nominations: 1 ) Only a nomination is necessary--there is no requirement to have the nomination seconded. 2) A 2/3 vote is required to close nominations. 3) Nominations cannot be closed if someone still wishes to make a nomination. /0114. 4) The first person nominated is voted upon first. All nominations are voted upon in the order in which they were presented. 5) Any procedures regarding nominations should be adopted before any nominations are made. Any such procedures should be presented in the form of a motion and voted upon by the Council . kmc loci NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ...... 0.. ,1,0 k PQikCHF ✓e,, .... ,,,.,,, I.s. . �'/ZON P c 'zty o L4pac�ie ounction r.. October 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER / 'z ^'r FROM: CITY CLERK ki SUBJECT: NOMINATION PROCEDURES It has been suggested that the Council may wish to adopt procedures pertaining to the nomination of individuals to fill the vacancy which currently exists on the city council . In the event that the Council does so, Robert' s Rules of Order specify that these procedures be adopted prior to the actual nominations. Any procedures presented to the Council for adoption should be placed in the form of a motion. ^, This item will appear on the October 16th agenda prior to the actual nominations for the council position. Approver for Agenda Date. i Item # First Reading kmc Second Reading Public Hearing ,Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 10C1 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES al ilfrilt)11) 04j / rl'IS))44 ITEM # MEETING OF l MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Ar YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR / , COUNCILMAN HTI v MIN C I Li tN-s-i-40114&-^ ,COUNCILMAN DAMIANO _MAYOR CLARKE UNAN POUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL C77— ITEM NO . 23a BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APCHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA , THAT THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES FOR CITY COUNCIL NOMINATIONS BE ADOPTED : l O\ Oi F Z '��'!ZU^!ice 2t2 £' ',:-7?/-,vcC ZC -unctzon September 4, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: Please accept my resignation from the Apache Junction City Council , effective October 2, 1984. Personal and business commitments do not allow me to devote the time to city business. It has been a pleasure serving with all of you. Thank you for your consideration. Sin erely, ,....... //) Hank Steelsmith HS/kmc /J� . Approver for Agenda /4/ Date Item # First Reading !,{ .._ iC! ;y -A Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business ;/ New Business Consent Agenda CC 1 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES el° cvu (,)fi' .06 ITEM # p� l MEETING OF MOT ON BY : SECONDED BY : ci YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC I 1 AN SHAH COUNCILMAt! DAMIANO V CO{ CIL44PI S TEE LSIITH /ICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN all ✓ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR J OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES yeti fr (Ni\/ ITEf 1 # • MEET I fJG OF ` 0 MOTION BY: cu4r() SECONDED BY: jr)'11/ YES/ NO ABSTAINED V COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL E9 -I-LN A?1 S11A4-S- VICEMAYOR EDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ L_`C6titIC I LMAN STEEL-f' ITh _MAYOR__CLARKF UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL V ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ) \ )&r ITEf1 # 023 MEETING OF i4 /0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED _ 1AYOR �ay __ rlLC �/� dSvfa ! ; .CO UN C I_LMAN T /01.-- ✓f NCILMAN o V ai S �- COUN C ILMAN t174'' f ,COUNCILMAN a,,& UNANIm.OUS % IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r\Ni14 f\ cif .211 ITEM it MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR 10/I COUNCILMAN f�- IL L V ie _ .MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL 4 1 p ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • ITEM # r MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED C. LMANDAMIANO CQUNCILIAM HILL_ COLINC ITS&TAYLOR .COUNCILMAN SHANKS _1I CF MAYOR EIDSON -COUNCILMAN STEFI SNITH / ' MAYOR CLARKE UNANITOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL1/f 23b BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA , THAT THE RESIGNATION OF HANK STEELSMITH FROM THE CITY COUNCIL , BE AND HEREBY IS ACCEPTED WITH REGRET . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT G BE APPOINTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL , EFFECTIVE 1 PLIklaeDaddrA) TERM TO EXPIRE MAY , 1987. } ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES j 1j1(11t ° 19' '17.6 ITEM # MEETING OF 1 U MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR V COUNCILMAN HILL _r IINC.Il NAN SHANIDS_.�. VICE_MAYOR FIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO v COUNCILMAN STEELSTLITL _MAYOR_ CLARKF 1 UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CAL VOTE SHEET NOTES i\ \lj , -co ../(1 ITEf1 # t MEETING OF / ° 33_71L, POTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED !a _ TE€LSMITH --;(444 C I LrPrf t SPAN _COUNCILMAN HILL COUn I LrAM TAYLOR CO UNC I LMAM DAM I ANO VICE MAYOR EIDSON 111.111111111111111111111 MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS � IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 24 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5 , 1984 , AT 7 : 00 P . M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 6 , 1984 , AT 6 : 00 P .M . , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . p Alft c-- ITEM NO. 24 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1984, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. (<1ACHE �G4'na K.s... � �O PIZONP ity o pace unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT October 10, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. Q4MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes from their regular meeting of September 25, 1984. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's Office. CRN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 r--s Amok PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER 25, 1984 7 00 P M MINUTES Present Absent Guests Mr Jorgensen None List in Planning Office Mr Heermans Mr. Hoaglin Mr Taylor Mr Tepolt Mr Vehon Mr. Sanchez, Chairman Mr Newcomer, Executive Secretary Mr Nakagawa, Staff Mrs. Samuelson, Recording Secretary Synopsis Agenda dated September 25, 1984 - approved as presented. Minutes dated September 11, 1984 - approved as presented PZ-28-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 287) - continued to October 23, 1984 Work session scheduled for October 4, 1984. PZ-44-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 308) - recommended for approval. PZ-45-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 309) - recommended for approval. PZ-46-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 310) - recommended for approval PZ-50-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 316) - recommended for approval PZ-51-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 317) - recommended for approval MC-S-84-44 (Crismon Corner) - recommended for approval. PC-PZ-42-84 (Shady Acres Limited Partnership) - recommended for approval 1. Roll call all members present 2 Chairman welcomed Mr Heermans to the Commission He called for a motion to approve the Agenda. "wok 3 Taylor/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated September 25, 1984 be approved as presented " The motion passed unanimously. 4 Chairman there being no discussion, called for approval of the Minutes dated September 11, 1984 5. Tepolt/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated September 11, 1984, be approved as presented " The motion passed 6-0-1, with Mr Sanchez voting "present." 6. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-28-84, which was remanded to the Commission by the City Council He asked for staff briefing. 7 Mr. Newcomer briefed the Commission stating that this case had been heard by the Commission on July 10th and sent to the City Council for August 7th and was directed by the Council to be reheard to identify specific reasons for denial or approval He -3 Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 noted that eight valid protests had been received to date and several non-valid written objections or protests He commented that the Ordinance makes no provision for owners living diagonally from the project as being within 150' from the project boundary for filing protests. 8. Mr Nakagawa showed a video tape of the site 9 Chairman asked if enough protests had been received to o require a 3/4's vote of the City Council \ 10. Mr Newcomer replied there were enough received 11 Mr. Taylor commented that the diagonal protests not being considered was an oversight and that they should amend the Ordinance to 150' all around the project 12. Mr Newcomer noted that the Ordinance conforms to State Statutes and that other cities interpret this several different ways 13. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 14. Keith Stachar represented the applicants who wish to develop a modern mobile/RV park. He added that they have no specific design plans at this time, but that they would meet all the City's specifications if approved He said that there will be 120 spaces. 15. Mr. Taylor stated that there had been a lot of protests received against the TH zoning and asked if the applicants had considered a commercial zoning. 16. Mr. Stachar replied that the General Plan calls for Medium/ High Density Residential use in this area He commented that he had never seen a commercial development on a side street 17. Chairman asked if he would be willing to accept a continuance for 30 days to allow the Commission to have a work session to discuss the preferred corridor for General Business in this area. PIN 18 Mr Stachar noted that there was no commercial development taking place in this area, and that land that was zoned commercial had been for sale for a long time He said he saw no reason to look into CB-2 in this area. 19. Chairman said there is a problem with what the land use of this area should be. 20. Mr. Stachar stated he saw no objection for a 30 day study 21 Mr Taylor asked if they had considered CR-5 22. Mr. Stachar replied that the owners felt the impact on the area would be less detrimental with TH 23 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if there was anyone to speak in opposition. 24. Edward Valencius spoke as a property owner in Apache Junction Plaza which is diagonal from the site He said he represents 37 owners across from the property He noted he was not notified of the public hearing. 3 Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 25 Chairman asked if they would have any objections to a possible shopping center or commercial business. 26 Mr. Valencius replied he would have no objection 27. George Petticrew gave a copy of his remarks to the Commission, showed a detailed map of the area, and read his remarks into the record He objected to �. the TH zoning due to property taxes, adjacent property values, density, and the environmental impact 28 Chairman asked if he would object to commercial in this area 29. Mr. Petticrew replied that a majority of the people in the area would have no objection to commercial zoning 30. Lyman Worthington said he owns property directly north and had mailed a protest to the City He said he would have no objection to CR-5 or CB-2. 31 Chairman asked for staff recommendation 32 Mr Newcomer stated that Mr Valencius had been sent a certified letter that had not been claimed so it was returned, and that no protest was received from Mr Worthington He noted that sufficient signatures had been received to require a 3/4's vote of the City Council He asked for a stipulation of roadway dedication if approval is recommended. He noted that the General Plan designation for this site is Medium/High Density Opportunity 33. Chairman asked for rebuttal from the applicant. 34 Mr Stachar felt that the reasons given on the protest petitions were not valid or adequate 35 Chairman there being no rebuttal from the opposition, he closed the public hearing. 36 Mr Jorgensen asked if it was possible to have a recommendation for a preferred corridor within 30 days 37 Chairman replied that they could try. 38 Mr Taylor noted that they have absorbed commercial within 600' of the property boundary before, but this applicant did not want commercial. 39 Commission discussion 40. Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that PZ-28-84 be continued until October 23, 1984, at 7.00 p m., in these City Council Chambers, to consider the City Attorney's opinion on a possible change and the legality of a rezoning request A work session will be held on October 4, 1984, at 7 00 p m , in the Community Services Room to consider if it would be legal to include this site in the 600' area to CB-2 " The motion passed 5-2-0, with Mr Tepolt and Mr. Vehon dissenting. 41 Chairman reconvened the meeting after a ten-minute recess at 8.28 p.m. He asked for staff briefing on OP"nr Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 PZ-44-84, a rezoning from GR to TH in Section 18 and opened the public hearing 42 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding the case 43. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 44 A E Sullivan, Jr represented the applicant who inherited the property and is planning to sell it. 45. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for Planning Deparment comments. 46. Mr. Newcomer stated that there is no objection and that the request is consistent with the General Plan and neighborhood characteristics He asked that stipulations be added to a recommendation for approval. 47. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 48 Mr Vehon asked if the City requires a roadway dedication when lots will be developed since the north end of the property would have no easement 49 Mr Newcomer replied that the City would require access. 50. Jorgensen/Tepolt M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-44-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 308, application of Arthur E. and Paul K Golter for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recommendations are 1. That the east forty feet (40') and the south and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. That the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer, or RV park, unless other- wise approved by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are 1 The request is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona 2 It is the best use of the property at this time " The motion passed unanimously 51 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-45-84, a rezoning from GR to TH in Section 18 and asked for staff briefing. 52. Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding the case. 53 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 54. Ione Chovanec represented the applicant who felt that TH would be more valuable She noted this parcel was next to the property in the previous case 55 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for Planning Department comments Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 56 Mr Newcomer stated there is no objection and that the request is consistent with the General Plan and neighborhood characteristics He asked that stipulations be added to a recommendation for approval 57. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 58. Tepolt/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-45-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 309, application of Fred and Lorene Sowash, Ray and So Yun Higgins, Robert and Rosemary Kim, and Lyman and Virginia Morkunas for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recommendations are• 1. That the east forty feet (40') and the south and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject site be dedicated to the City for public roadway and associated purposes 2 That the site not be developed into a mobile home, travel trailer, or RV park, unless other- wise approved by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood 2 It seems to be the best use of the property at this time " The motion passed unanimously 59 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-46-84, a rezoning from GR to CB-2 in Section 19 and asked for staff briefing 60 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding the case 61. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 62 Russ Nielson said what he is proposing is different than the site plan previously submitted. He said he aquired some other property to the west of the bank and that he plans to build a motel and restaurant on the site 63. Mr. Taylor asked if he would agree to a buffer such as a fence between the development and the residential area to the north 64. Mr Nielson replied that the setback requirements are such that he did not think a buffer zone would be needed. He added that there would be a solid wall along the north property line. He said that the motel would be built in two phases. 65 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for Planning Department comments. Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 66. Mr. Newcomer recommended approval as it is consistent with the General Plan and is an appropriate use for the property. He added that his only concern would be buffering for the residential neighborhood to the north 67. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 68 Vehon/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona that rezoning case PZ-46-84, also known as ,/'� Proposed Ordinance No. 310, application of A. Russell and Mary Nielson, and E James and Irene Lunt for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recommendations are A solid masonry wall be placed along the northern boundary of this property as it is developed to help serve as a buffer between this property and the single- family residences to the north. The reasons for this recommendation are 1. This zoning would be in compliance with the City of Apache Junction which allows a potential general business zone in this area 2 That this property would warrant general business zoning due to its proximity to the State highway and the traffic that the State highway affords 3 That the City of Apache Junction would best be served by the extension of this CB-2 zoning to the north on this particular property " The motion passed unanimously. 69 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-50-84, a rezoning from CR-1 to CR-4/PD in Section 28. He asked for staff briefing 70 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding the case, including the case history stating that the City Council had denied the rezoning to CR-5/PD on this case on May 1, 1984 He said that the applicant has refiled asking for CR-4/PD and plans to develop a 68 unit townhouse project, with lot sizes averaging 3,600 square feet and will utilize a zero lot line concept with attached single-story dwelling units He added that at the time of filing the original application, the General Plan was Residential - Medium Density 71. Chairman asked the applicant to speak on the case 72 Martin Jones represented Randall Industries He said these would be permanent houses He noted that he would like to make his comments made at the previous hearing as part of this meeting's record He pointed out the modifications made on the new plans and said that the density had been reduced Page Seven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 73. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition 74 Earl Laabs stated that his main objection is that it is not consistent with the General Plan He said that the General Plan should be changed first He added that he owns property near the site 75. Tom Knapp said he is on the border of the property and asked the Commission to give consideration to a •-•""` lower density He said he was concerned about sewage problems 76 Mr Hoaglin noted that the application complied with the General Plan at the time of filing and asked how low he wanted the applicant to go and how he would arrive at the chosen figure 77. Mr. Knapp replied that he would like to see 55 units on the property and that he just pulled the figure out of the air 78. Chairman asked how many units would comply with the General Plan 79. Mr. Newcomer replied about 40 80 Chairman asked for Planning Department comments 81. Mr. Newcomer recommended approval based on the concept plan and narrative submitted. He said it was in compliance with the General Plan at the time of the original submission He added that both 16th Avenue and Winchester Road can accomodate the anticipated traffic load He noted that the wall and single-story theme of the development will provide adequate buffering to the adjacent CR-1 zoning and ample recreational opportunity will be afforded the project residents within the project boundaries He commented that staff felt that relaxing the setback standards of the CR-4 zone would result in a better project. 82. Chairman asked for rebuttal from the applicant 83 Mr Jones stated that the map is not the General Plan. He said that the General Plan states goals, policies, and objectives He said it speaks about mix of housing and percentages He commented that 6 8 units per acre was not high density. 84. Chairman asked how many units were permitted under medium density 85 Mr. Newcomer replied that there would be up to 100 units on a 10 acre site 86. Mr Taylor noted that the Commission had specifically excluded this site at the time of the General Plan amendments, and recommended that it stay Medium Density, but that the City Council did not act on that recommendation. 87 Chairman asked for rebuttal from the opposition 88 Mr Laabs said that his main concern is that the General Plan be changed back to High Density before rezoning He wanted to be assured that the entire 80 acres would not be Medium Density 89 Mr Jones stated that it does not matter if the adopted General Plan is in conflict with existing zoning. Page Eight - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 He said the General Plan is a projection He commented that the City Council asked Mr Gero if it was necessary to exclude this parcel and they were told "no" since the applicant already had filed He said there was never an intent to treat the parcel as low density. 90 Mr Laabs said that the City Council had voted the entire 80 acre parcel as low density. 91. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motiorralS 92 Vehon/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-50-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 316, application of 1 Morton Seltzer of Randall Industries for his property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence to CR-4/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application, with the stipulation that the concept plan and narrative be substantially in compliance for preliminary and final Planned Development approval The reasons for this recommendation are 1 This particular rezoning is in compliance with all parts of Section 33 09 of the City of Apache Junction Ordinance 2 Although this particular property is not at this time in compliance with the Land Use Map, I this particular property is in compliance with the total General Plan of Apache Junction as pointed out earlier as it does try to provide for a mix of types of uses of housing and commercial and everything else in the City of Apache Junction, and this project would provide some affordable single-family housing which at this time is not available in this area. 3. This particular rezoning would serve as an adequate and a good buffer between the low density areas to the north, west, and south of this project to the high density uses that are on the east and southeast of this particular property " The motion passed 5-2-0, with Mr. Heermans and Mr Taylor dissenting 93 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-51-84, a rezoning from GR to CB-2 in Section 21. He asked for staff briefing 94 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding the case 95. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 96 H Dan Crye said he is currently on Colt Road with a mobile home sales lot and wants to move his entire business down from Phoenix to the site He said he wants to leave the center 11 acre parcel GR to live on He commented on the flood plain through his property 97. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition 98 George Johnston stated that he was the owner of the Superstition Ranch mobile home park to the north of the site. He commented on the old used and wrecked trailers at r--s Am. oak Page Nine - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 on the site and lined up on 5th Avenue. He said there is someone living there now. He added that since it is on the highway, it should be graded, fenced, and neat. He did not want any roads abandoned 99. Mr. Taylor asked if there was a record of a business license. 100 Mr Johnston replied there was not. He said the person living in the trailer now is using his water and dumping .rak the sewage from the trailer on the ground 101 Chairman asked for Planning Department comments 102. Mr. Newcomer stated there was no objection to the rezoning. He recommended a dedication of roadway to the City 103. Chairman asked for rebuttal from the applicant 104 Mr Crye stated that he needs a permit before he can proceed with his project He said he had obtained his permit to start fencing 10 days ago, but he would not slat the fence or put up a block wall 105. Mr. Vehon said he was concerned when he drove by the property He said a man had been hired to grade the property without permission to grade, so the Building Department put up "Stop Work" tags 106. Mr. Taylor asked if it would be just used sales or refurbishing. 107 Mr Crye replied that he did not do any refurbishing other than carpeting and minor repairs 108 Mr Heermans asked what the name of the business was in Phoenix 109. Mr. Crye replied it was City Trailer Sales. 110 Chairman asked for rebuttal from the opposition 111. Mr. Johnston asked if the area could not have a screened fence. 112 Mr Taylor replied it could be required in the zoning and that a business should be screened from the residential areas. 113 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 114. Taylor/Heermans M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-51-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 317, application of H. Dan Crye for his property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are. 1 That the applicant dedicate to the City for public roadway and associated purposes, the east forty feet (40' ) of the subject site, and the north thirty-three feet (33' ) if East 5th Avenue is not abandoned 2 The north side of the subject property shall be fenced with proper screening from the residential area to the north The reasons for this recommendation are. 1 The subject property is in a commercial Page Ten - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 opportunity zone, and this rezoning would be in substantial compliance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction 2. It is probably the best use of the property at this time " The motion passed unanimously 115 Chairman reconvened the meeting after a five-minute recess at 10 17 p.m. He asked for staff briefing on the next Agenda item under Requests From Other Agenci MC-S-84-44 116. Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission stating that this is a referral from Maricopa County for review of subdivision preliminary plat for 20 lots with four-plex units and that staff had no objection. 117 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, called for a motion 118. Vehon/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Commission recommends to Maricopa County the approval of the subdivision preliminary plat in case MC-S-84-44." The motion passed unanimously 119 Chairman asked for staff briefing on PC-PZ-42-84 120. Mr. Newcomer briefed the Commission stating that this was a referral from Pinal County for a rezoning from MHP to RV/PAD He noted that the summary submitted to Pinal County was in the Commission packets. 121 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 122. Brent Stowall read narrative submitted with project and showed various renderings of the project 123. Mr. Vehon asked if a sewage system had been discussed. 124. Mr Stowall replied they had not discussed it yet. He added oak that the last park they developed has a treatment plant, but due to the economics they would rather stay with the septics. He said they would consider a plant if needed. 125 Mr Jorgensen asked about the half street paving in front of the project 126 Mr Stowall said that they plan to pave their half and that the State will have to be approached to pave their half 127 Mr Jorgensen asked about the water supply. 128 Mr Stowall replied it was Arizona Water Company and that the utilities are through the City of Mesa He said the utility service has been okayed 129. John Baer spoke on the requirements for a treatment plant, and about having a mobile home park in with light industry which he believed was compatible. 130 Mr Heermans was concerned about 800 spaces going so close to schools and industrial s Page Eleven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 131. Mr. Baer felt that it is inevitable that there will be heavy traffic on Ironwood. 132 Mr. Heermans asked if they will let people know that the adjacent property will be light industrial. 133 Mr. Baer replied that he was sure it would not be a problem 134 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for Planning Department comments. 135. Mr Newcomer stated that staff objects to the rezoning as it is not compatible with the General Plan designation for this area He said there was a possibility of converting to industrial in the future which could not be done if they sell lots He added that the site is not served by a paved road and would create excessive dust He noted that the plans did look like it would be a nice park 136. Mr Stowall passed out copies of the plans. 137 Chairman called for a motion 138 Taylor/Vehon M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Commission recommends to Pinal County the approval of case PC-PZ-42-84. Any recommendations are That an Arizona State approved sewage treatment facility be installed since there are enough units to make it economically feasible The reason for making this motion for approval against staff recommendation is that economics of the situation are such that this parcel is without a doubt going to be developed either into a rental park or into a very nice planned area development park and the situation in that area would probably be compatible with light industrial type development in the future. This type of park in that area would be more of an asset than a detriment to the City of Apache Junction, especially since it already has MHP zoning and the applicant is entitled to put in a rental park now without any consideration from the Commission or Pinal County" The motion passed 6-1-0, with Mr Sanchez dissenting 139 Chairman there being no further business, called for a motion to adjourn 140. Vehon/Jorgensen M/S to adjourn The meeting adjourned at 11 26 p m. I Recorded and transcribed by Marge a nelson RecordingSecretary �� , Respectfully submitted, lf / ., L• , y ,Lf�.LL., Charles R Newcome , Executive Secretary Page Twelve - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 25, 1984 APPROVED GC4,76 Ken Sanchez Chairman / Planning and Zoning C ission �\ I e--•s ANN (SACHE✓G ji �O v t'i Z �r gRiZONP ity Cache &unctivn DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 14, 1984 MEMORANDUM TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL n n THROUGH '4MICHAEL J McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM ,) CHARLES R NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find a copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes from their meeting of August 28, 1984. sae* Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's Office CRN mas '001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONEI6021 982-8002 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AUGUST 28, 1984 7 00 P M MINUTES Present Absent Guests ix Mr. Jorgensen None List in Planning Office Mr. Hoaglin Mr. Taylor Mr Tepolt Mr Vehon Mr. Sanchez, Chairman Mr. Newcomer, Executive Secretary Mr Nakagawa, Staff Mrs Samuelson, Recording Secretary Synopsis Agenda dated August 28, 1984 - approved as presented Minutes dated August 14, 1984 - approved as presented. PZ-30-83 (Proposed Ordinance No 217) - continued to September 11, 1984 PZ-40-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 303) - recommended for approval PZ-41-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 304) - recommended for approval. PZ-42-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 305) - recommended for approval PZ-43-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 306) - recommended for denial Adjournment. 1 Roll call all members present 2. Chairman recognized presence of Councilman Damiano and Councilwoman Taylor 3. Taylor/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated August 28, 1984, be approved as presented." The motion passed unanimously. 4 Tepolt/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated August 14, 1984, be approved as presented " The motion passed unanimously 5. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-30-83 and asked for staff briefing 6 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission stating that this case had been continued from the meeting of August 14, 1984 He noted the surrounding zonings and uses. 7 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 8 Gregory Hamblin said that since the last meeting a correction had been made on the parcels to the south of his site from CR-3 to CR-5. He noted that Parcel No 2 will act as a buffer on the back side with single- story 4-plexes 9. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition Ors"-- " Ailak Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 28, 1984 10. R. Ramirez, Jr. said he was speaking for all the home owners on Buena Vista who did not want anymore apartments 11. Father Charles Maloney spoke as the pastor and administrator of St George's Catholic Church He noted that the church had not been given enough notification time and was concerned about the tenancy of the 4-plexes. He said that this was the last 1 piece of property as a buffer between the single-family and multiple-family areas He requested that an impact study be done on how this development will affect the single- family dwellings and the entire neighborhood 12. Dick Drysdale stated that no one had contacted him in the past two weeks and that there are a lot of people against the rezoning 13. Mr. Taylor questioned the lack of notification of the church 14 Mr Newcomer requested a 5-minute recess to check the 300' list. The meeting resumed at 7 30 and he noted that the Diocese of Tucson was not on the 300' list 15 Mr Taylor noted that the City Ordinance specifies that the people within 150' must be notifed by certified mail within 15 days prior to the public hearing 16. Taylor/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that PZ-30-83 be continued to the next meeting on September 11, 1984, in these City Council Chambers, to allow time for proper legal notification to be made to the party concerned." The motion passed 4-2-0, with Mr Vehon and Mr Sanchez dissenting 17 Mr Hamblin noted that he will probably get with Mr Nakagawa in the morning to pull his application 18. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-40-84, rezoning from TH to CB-2 in Section 27 19. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 20 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 21 Mike Kovacs represented the owners who want to rezone to what the Land Use Map indicates. 22. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for Planning Department comments. 23 Mr Nakagawa noted the request is consistent with the General Plan He recommended stipulations of roadway dedication. He said that access should not be taken directly off of the highway which will be handled by the City Engineer. 24. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 25 Taylor/Vehon M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-40-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 303, application of Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 28, 1984 David and Lauretta Druckman for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from Trailer Homesite Zone (TH) to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recorrmiendations are The applicant dedicate the south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. The reasons for this recommendation are 1 This commercial rezoning is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. 2 It is the best use of the property at this time " The motion passed unanimously 26. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-41-84, rezoning from GR to TH in Section 21. 27. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 28 Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 29. Keith Stachar represented the owners He said the request is compatible with existing development and the General Plan 30. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition 31. Mrs. Mewhorter asked how many trailers could be put on the two parcels 32 Mr. Newcomer stated that they are governed by two sets of rules, the Zoning Ordinance and State and r\ City subdivision rules. He said they could have 3 now without going subdivision 33 Mr Vehon wanted to know if she objected to dividing the property into 6 different lots 34. Mrs Mewhorter said she did 35 Emma Baker stated she was not opposed to 3 mobile homes on each lot, but was opposed to any further breakdown 36. Chairman asked for Planning Department comments 37 Mr. Nakagawa stated there was no objection, it was consistent with the Medium/High Density General Plan designation. He recommended a stipulation of roadway dedication and that the property not be allowed to develop into an RV or mobile home park because of the density issue 38 Chairman asked if the applicant had any rebuttal 39 Mr. Stachar said that because of terrain and wash it would be difficult to divide the property into anymore than 3 parcels s Page Four Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 28, 1984 40. Chairman asked for rebuttal from the opposition 41 Mrs Mewhorter said that Mr Stachar was right about the condition of the land She asked about the roadways 42. Mr Nakagawa stated that there was a graded road there and that they might have to cut a roadway through the two parcels. 43 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 44. Jorgensen/Tepolt M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-41-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 304, application of Ronald and Anna May Williams and Robert Christensen for R E Christensen, Inc for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recommendations are 1 The applicant dedicate the west and south thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes 2. That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It is in accordance with the Medium Density General Plan designation 2. It is a good use of the property." The motion passed unanimously. egb' 45 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-42-84, rezoning from CR-5 to TH in Section 21 46 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 47. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 48 Keith Stachar represented the owners He said they intend to make 3 lots out of this parcel. and that the terrain is similar to the last case He added that there is a mobile home on the property at this time 49 Chairman asked if a zone change from CR-5 to TH would be beneficial 50. Mr. Stachar replied that the owners have tried to sell the property for over two years 51 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for Planning Department comments. 52 Mr Nakagawa stated there were no objections, and that the request was consistent with the General Plan He recommended a stipulation of roadway dedications and that the property be not allowed to develop into an RV or mobile home park 11,"" r /'1\ ^ Page five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 28, 1984 53 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 54. Tepolt/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-42-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 305, application of Ronald and Anna May Will^dms for their property described as, a matter of public record,(- . requesting rezoning from CR-5 Multiple Residence to Trailer Homesite Zone (TH), that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recommendations are 1. The applicant dedicate the north and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2 That the development of the site into an RV park or mobile home park be prohibited, except as otherwise permitted by the City The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It is in accordance with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona 2 It seems the best use of the land at this time 3 It is in accordance with the prescribed density " The motion passed unanimously 55 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-43-84, rezoning from GR to TH in Section 18 56 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 57 Chairman the applicant not being present, and there being no one to speak in favor, he asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. 58. Robert Anderson stated that he owns both parcels surrounding the property and he is not in favor of seeing 3 trailers on the property. 59. Chairman asked for Planning Department comments 60 Mr. Nakagawa stated that the request was consistent with the General Plan He recommended stipulations of roadway dedications and that the property not be allowed to develop into an RV or mobile home park He noted that they have a petition on file from the Anderson's which will require a 3/4's vote for the City Council to approve the request 61 Chairman asked if there was anything else anyone wanted to add 62 Mr Anderson said that there are livestock privileges in the area and he was afraid that they would be lost if the area is split up 63. Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion r^s Agok ow. r� I.rsQACHE 4�' --- IVLZ -9,pIZOO. C .itz 4 G -pache 02unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 26, 1984 MEMORANDUM/0'THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: >4,zio % tICHAEL J McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM LOV CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes from their regular meeting of September 11, 1984 Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's Office CRN.mas L1G01 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602)9828002 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA SEPTEMBER 11, 1984 7.00 P.M MINUTES Present Absent Mr Jorgensen Mr. Sanchez Mr Heermans Mr. Hoaglin Mr Taylor Mr Tepolt Mr. Vehon, Acting Chairman Mr Newcomer, Executive Secretary Mr Nakagawa, Staff Synopsis Agenda dated September 11, 1984 - approved as presented Minutes dated August 28, 1984 - approved as presented PZ-30-83 (Proposed Ordinance No. 217) - recommended for approval to CR-5/PD. PC-PZ-37-84 (Stapley/Cardon) - recommended for approval PC-PZ-39-84 (Granillo/Worst/Ashton) - recommended for approval MC-S-84-42 (Desert Air Grande Unit 2) - recommended for approval 1. Roll call six members present with one absent as noted above 2 Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated September 11, 1984 be accepted as presented " The motion passed unanimously 3 Tepolt/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated August 28, 1984, be approved as presented " The motion passed unanimously 4 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-30-83, rezoning from CR-3 to CR-5/PD and CR-5 in Section 29, and asked for staff briefing. 5 Mr Newcomer stated that the applicant would not be present and staff would try to respond to any inquiries 6 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition 7. Father Charles Maloney was opposed to the rezoning on the grounds that it is not conducive to the growth of families in the area He said he spoke for families in the area who were opposed to four-plexes 8 Jim Bakkedahl felt that a person owning a home would be more apt to take care of it than those in a multi- family dwelling. 9. Chairman there being no one else to speak in opposition, asked for staff comments. Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 11, 1984 10 Mr. Newcomer said that if the applicant is going to use Plaza Circle as a public street, it should be dedicated to the public He commented that staff is favorable for both the CR-5/PD twin home concept and for the CR-5 zoning for the four lots on the west end, noting that the General Plan has High Density residential in that area and also the surrounding land uses and zoning seem to be appropriate for that usuage 11. Phil Kerwin asked what does it mean when they say that the area is proposed for High Density dwelling. He said he had been to several Planning and Zoning meetings and he has seen Roadhaven jammed down his throat, another trailer park on the end of the street jammed down his throat, two water tanks were also stuck in his face. He wanted to know why they were being put in the midst of single family homes Our whole area has been cut up and we have just been thrown out 12. Barry Mead said she has a very bad taste in her mouth for Apache Junction She felt that the zoning in Apache Junction was not planned well and is im- proper. She felt they should have had one part for RV's and one part for mobiles She said one part should have been for family dwellings and duplexes, etc If you don't put a stop to it now, you are just going to have cesspool Junction 13 Mr. Taylor asked what was beyond the CR-5 in the middle. 14 Mr Newcomer replied that there was CR-5 in the neighborhood and it was zoned by Pinal County. 15 Phil Kerwin felt that his question was not answered as to who and why decides these things. He said when he purchased his house in the area it all started out as single family homes and he anticipated his children growing up with other children in the neighborhood Now he said he looks at a wall. He wanted to know to what benefit it was putting all these trailer parks in. He felt he had lost every benefit that he had moved to Apache Junction for 16 Mr Taylor asked if they approved the rezoning for twin homes how would this affect Parcel No 2 17 Mr Newcomer replied that the developer would have to go through the process again on Parcel No. 2. 18 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion 19 Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-30-83, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 217, application of Greg Hamblin of Hamblin Diversified for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-3 to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence by Planned Development, (this is the twin homes that will be offered for sale) for both Parcel No 1 and Parcel No 2, and rejecting the Parcel No. 2 rezoning for Multiple Family, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of this application as set forth with those changes Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 11, 1984 Stipulations or recommendations are 1 That the applicant dedicate the interior streets if they are to be public streets. 2 That the floor plans be redesigned so that more of the facade of the homes may be viewed from the street. The reasons for this recommendation are Even though the multiple-family rezoning is permissible under the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction, it actually is not compatible with this particular area Even though this area was designated a possible High Density area by the General Plan, there is more CR-3 in this area. In my opinion, we should keep the CR-3 zoning if possible and encourage these developers to put in homes for resale. It does comply with Section 33 of the General Plan (Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Apache Junction " The motion passed unanimously. 20. Chairman asked for staff briefing on the next agenda item under Requests From Other Agencies, PC-PZ-37-84, a Pinal County referral. 21 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission stating that the applicant is requesting a rezoning from RVP to RVP/PAD to subdivide the park into individual lots for sale He added that there are currently 1,147 rental spaces in the park 22. Keith Fingle said he is the manager of the property and felt the rezoning will increase the tax revenue in the County. 23. Mr. Newcomer commented that in the County without going PAD, they require 6,000 square feet per recreational vehicle under the standard zoning. 24. Chairman said the City is concerned about Goldfield Road because of the size of the projects and the number of vehicles that will go to the project from the highway He asked what the developer plans to do with the amount of dust that will be created. 25. Mr Fingle replied that they will work with Pinal County on that procedure. 26 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition of this case, he asked for staff recommendations 27 Mr Newcomer gave a list of concerns which he said are incorporated into the recommended motion given to the Commission. 1 )_ 28. Mr. Fingle commented that there is a water retention basin in the southwest corner of the property, there are fire hydrants throughout the interior, streetlights throughout the interior, the area is paved around the east and south side, but they do not have sidewalks 29 Chairman called for a motion. v- AM. 00111k Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 11, 1984 30. Taylor/Tepolt M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Commission recommends to Pinal County the approval of case PC-PZ-37-84 for rezoning from RVP to RVP/PAD. The following conditions are requested 1. Goldfield Road be paved to Highway 60. 2 Sidewalks and street lights be installed around the project perimeter 3 Adequate provisions be made for on-site retention. 4 Adequate provisions be made for the drainage systems along Goldfield and Baseline. 5. Fire hydrants be installed per Fire District specifications 6 All interior streets be a minimum of twenty- eight feet (28') with a minimum turning radii of twenty-two feet (22') and all entrances be a minimum of twenty feet (20') of unobstructed width as per the Fire District's requirements The reason for this recommendation is. This proposed park is in compliance with our density requirements for the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction." The motion passed unanimously 31 Chairman asked for staff briefing on PC-PZ-39-84. 32. Mr. Nakagawa stated that this is a request from Mr Ashton to rezone from TH to TH/PAD for a 60 acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Southern and Cortez in Section 34. He said the applicant intends to create a mobile home subdivision with 395 lots fftiN 33 John Granillo represented the developer He said there will be either single or double-wide mobile homes, and each lot will be approximately 6,500 square feet. He added that the development will be basically for retired people. 34. Commission discussion on the size of the lots 35 Chairman asked for staff recommendation 36. Mr. Nakagawa gave the recommendations which are incorporated into the recommended motion for the Commission. 37. Mr. Granillo felt that 6,500 square feet was adequate for = the lots 38 Mr Newcomer said that the Zoning Ordinance requires 8,000 square feet and that in Planned Development in exchange for smaller lot sizes, certain amenities are included in the project. 39 Chairman called for a motion. /'\ Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 11, 1984 40 Jorgensen/Tepolt M/S "BE IT RESOVLED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Commission recommends to Pinal County the approval of case PC-PZ-39-84 for rezoning from TH to TH/PAD and that the following conditions are requested 1 The applicant dedicate fifty feet (50') on Southern Avenue and forty feet (40') on Cortez Road for public roadway and street lighting 2. The applicant install off-site improvements^ including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, drainage improvements, and street lighting 3 The perimeter wall be recessed at various intervals, that the height of the wall be alternated, and the landscaping along street frontages consist of naturalizing vegetation 4 Lot sizes be kept at 8,000 square feet unless the developer provides unusual design elements or sufficient common open and recreational space to justify decreased lot sizes. 5 Twenty feet (20') by twenty feet (20') cut-offs be provided at each corner. 6 All interior streets shall be a minimum of twenty-eight feet (28') with a minimum turning radii of twenty-two (22') All entrances shall be a minimum of twenty- feet (20') of unobstructed width. 7. Fire hydrants shall be installed as to the specifications of the Apache Junction Fire Department 8 Signs shall be kept low profile 9. On-site retention be provided The reason for this recommendation is Providing the above-mentioned conditions are implemented, it will be in compliance with Section 33 09 of the General Plan (Zoning Ordinance) " The motion passed unanimously 41 Chairman asked for staff briefing on MC-S-84-42. 42 Mr Nakagawa stated that this is a subdivision request by Norman Lewis for 56 lots on 18.4 acres on the southwest corner of Crismon and Adobe which is currently zoned R1-8 by Maricopa County. He added that the Planning Department would recommend that the elbows that look like cul-de- sacs be eliminated, except for the one at 99th Place which appears acceptable. 43. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, called for a motion. i Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 11, 1984 44. Taylor/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Commission recommends to Maricopa County the approval of case MC-S-84-42 for a 56 lot subdivision. Stipulations or recommendations are. That of the three elbows that look like cul-de-sacs, only the elbow at 99th ,000.4 Place appears acceptable The reasons for this recommendation are This subdivision unit in this area would substantially be compatible with the area." The motion passed unanimously 45 Commission there being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Charles R Newcomer, Executive Secretary APPROVED 1 Tony Veho , Aging Chairman Planning nd Zoning Commission I� eliN I I CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 122 East 2nd Avenue Regular Meeting September 4, 1984 A regular meeting of the Apache Junction Library Board of Trustees was held September 4, 1984 at 7 00 p m at the Apache Junction Library pursuant to notice as prescribed by law. Roll Call -- Present Absent Russell, Charles Hiller, Jan Pierce, Dwight Lewis, Eleanor Eldridge, Hazel Hammer, Margaret (resigned) Polomskey, Alice Staff Pamela Loui Others present. Don Taylor 1 Acceptance of Agenda: Motion to accept the agenda was made by Hazel Eldridge then seconded by Alice Polomskey. 2 Acceptance of Minutes. Motion to accept minutes of August 7 meeting raised and seconded 3 Librarian Report: Pam Loui, Librarian, reported a total circulation of 4381 In addition Pam announced that two new staff members had been hired thus filling the roster at the library Pam also announced that the Children's Hour for the community would begin in October. 4 Committee Reports. Dwight Pierce stated that a meeting to select an architect for the new library would be held at 9:00 a m. Saturday, September 8 at the Council Chambers. He stated that it was open to the public and extended an invitation to all interested parties. 5. Old Business A motion was raised by Dwight Pierce to postpone action on a previous proposal raised by absent member, Jan Hiller Motion seconded by Charles Russell The matter will be reopened when Jan attends another meeting 6 New Business Dwight Pierce mentioned that a decision on the grant for a senior citizen's center will be reached next month He had received his information speaking to City Manager McNulty Alice Polomskey added that the size of the grant will determine to a great extent the size and design of the building An informal discussion was held weighing the disadvantages of combining a new library with a senior citizen's center The consensus was that the economy factors of a combined facility may be attractive; however, care- ful planning must be insured to avoid hampering the normal functions /y /01 Iprimmr City of Apache Junction Library Board of Trustees Regular Meeting September 4, 1984 Page 2 staff. Don Taylor, only member of the general public to attend, compared the library to a school to cite the similiarity in security needs and multiplicity of function An agreement was reached that the City Manager should be made aware of the problem that could arise if the shared concept was too overlapping 3 Request for letter of support for LSCA Motion made by Alice Polomkey to grant conceive and send letter. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor Agreed informally that Pam Loui and Charles Russell would jointly conceive the letter and that signatures could be obtained at the next session of the Board or by dropping by the library at the leisure of board members. 7. Call to the Public• No response 8. Request for future agenda items. Only item discussed was the possible need for stationary to be used for board use Will be placed on agenda for next regular session 9. Adjournment Motion by Hazel Eldridge and seconded by Alice Polomskey I � � Pr 'dent Secretary L CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 122 East 2nd Avenue Special Meeting September 18, 1984 A special meeting of the Apache Junction Library Board of Trustees was held September 18, 1984 at 5 o'clock pursuant to notice as prescribed by law for the express purpose of electing a secretary to fill the vacancy left by the resignation of Margaret Hammer Roll Call-- Present Absent Russell, Charles Lewis, Eleanor Hiller, Jan Eldridge, Hazel Pierce, Dwight Polomskey, Alice Staff: Pamela Loui Others None 1. Acceptance of Agenda: Motion to accept agenda made by Alice Polomskey, seconded by Jan Hiller. 2. Election of Secretary Name of Charles Russell was placed to fill position in nomination by Alice Polomskey, vacated by Margaret seconded by Jan Hiller Roll call Hammer vote was taken and election of Charles Russell as Secretary was unanimous. 3. Adjournment Motion to adjourn was made by Jan Hiller and seconded by Charles Russell Pres d nt ((ij'461/ Secretary I (1.-§p,C H ✓G tz I ' O U Z qR/ZONP city o . pacheunction INVESTMENT OF FUNDS SEPTEMBER 7, 1984 p Those Present: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Lori V. Clark, Deputy City Clerk On August 29, 1984, the City Clerk 's office provided letters to First Federal Savings, 3160 W. Apache Trail , Apache Junction; First Interstate, P.O. Drawer F, Apache Junction; Arizona Bank, 6861 E. Apache Trail , Mesa; United Bank, P.O. Box J, Apache Junction; Valley National Bank, P.O. Box 29505, Phoenix, and Western Savings & Loan, 242 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, informing them of the City's desire to invest the sum of $1 ,177,000.00 for a series of thirty-two (32) days. Each Bank was asked to submit a written bid by 9:30 a.m. , on September 7, 1984, indicating the rate of interest offered on the dollar amount for the period of thirty-two (32) days. The bids, opened and read by the City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, were as follows: United Bank no bid submitted First Federal Savings 32 days offered an interest rate of 12.02% on the total amount Valley National Bank no bid submitted Western Savings & Loan 32 days offered an interest rate of �. 11 .75% on the total amount First Interstate Bank no bid submitted Arizona Bank no bid submitted ;rez-a-(ii,<) Kathleen Connelly City Clerk WITNESS: I la ' Lori V. Clark Deputy City Clerk lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ;‘' G\ ITEM # 2)-() MEETING OF / ° ° MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COIINCTI MAN ]Y\MIANO r.fUNCILMANLHILE_ COUNC I VAN_ TAYLOR V 3-HARKS VI _IICF MAYOR EIDSON £OUNCI-AAN 2TEEL_Sf'1ITH MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR, OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL N ITEM NO . 26 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P. M. : )/j111 Ae:tp,IYA ilia 191\41A ROLL CALL 1o1/ /'V 14i 1 ROLL CALL IPRESENT ( ABSENT I — W,g. • I W.S. MAYOR CLARKE VICE-MAYOR EIDSON i / , E / � ' COUNCILMAN HILL _ 1 / `� I COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ± i ! - 000NCI LMAN SHANKS ! I Q COUNC I[MAN DAMIANO r ` TOTAL 1 J 6 i 1 1 STAFF PRESENT ( W. . W. • CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY ✓ r CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis $ v 4 -, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Chuck Newcomer _ ✓ ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman _ ✓ ✓ CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch / U 14 . ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph , ✓ , m' 1 v v U A •