The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985 04.16 City Council Regular Agenda (JAC H�� Al` Am. � � hr'' IP•')Z "IPizONP G%Zt 1pG1C12e vZLf1GtZUn APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 APRIL 16, 1985 7.00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA (All items marked with an asterisk (*) will be considered by the City Council as a group and will be adopted with one motion. No separate discussion will be held on any of these items unless a Councilmember wishes to do so. In this case, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ) *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from the Special Meeting of April 1, 1985 *3. Acceptance of Minutes from the Regular Meeting of April 2, 1985 *4. Proposed Resolution No. 85-14, AB-85-02, Application by Jerry Burgess and Erhardt Legler to abandon Desert View Drive between Greasewood Street and Superstition Boulevard. *5. Proposed Resolution No. 85-13, AB-85-03, Request for vacation of a portion of Cody Street and Ohio Street. *6. Request for Planned Development time extension for Rainbow Valley by Alfred Bellucci . *7. Proposed Resolution No. 84-55, Declaring the Uniform Sign Code, 1982 edition as a public record. *8. Proposed Resolution No. 85-15, Declaring the Policies and Procedures manual for the Police Department as public record. INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED VISITORS AND GUESTS AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 292, PZ-33-84, SIGN CODE (With the Emergency Clause) fr'\ 10. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 342, PZ-69-84, Application by Robert and Barbara Jones and Jerry Burgess to rezone 2.5 acre parcel , located on the south side of 12th Avenue between the Solana and Acacia Road alignments in Section 27, from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone. 11. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 343, PZ-70-89, Application by Robert and Barbara Jones, Jerry Burgess, Dona and Bonnie Puckett, Michelle Sitek, and Susan Salido to rezone 5 acre parcel , located on the northeast corner of Royal raim Road and 4th Avenue u Sectiu 21, from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone. 12. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 349, PZ-1-85, Application by Edward and Ann Slowinski through Jerry Burgess and Robert Jones to rezone 1.25 acre parcel , located on the east side of Grand Drive, 165 feet south of Windsong Street in Section 18, from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone. 13. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 372, POLICE PERSONNEL POLICIES (With the Emergency Clause) 14. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 375, INSTALLATION OF EQUESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNS ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD (With the Emergency Clause) 15. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 377, SPEED LIMITS (With the Emergency Clause) 16. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 378, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (With the Emergency Clause) 17. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 379, INITIATIVE PETITIONS (With the Emergency Clause) 18. APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE, AMERICAN LEGION, POST 27 OLD BUSINESS 19. RECONSIDERATION OF PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, KC BAR BQ NEW BUSINESS z. 20. Request for Amendment to Planned Development for Sierra Entrada, PZ-3-82 21. Acceptance of Resignation from and Appointment to Planning and Zoning Commission 22. Appointment to Recreational Vehicle Review Committee 23. Award of Bid for Auditing Services, CM-85-2 24. Consulting Services/City Engineer 25. Work Session, May 6, 1985 Executive Session, Work Session, May 7, 1985 CALL TO THE PUBLIC 26. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL 27. ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS." oink CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 1, 1985 The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache ^ Junction, Arizona, was held on April 1, 1985, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 6.45 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present. Councilman Shanks, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Hill, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Staff Present City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 85-12, CANVASS OF VOTES FOR PRIMARY ELECTION City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that Arizona State Law requires that, following an election the governing body must meeting on the first Monday immediately following the election and canvass the votes, accepting the results of the election by means of a resolution. Ms Connelly stated that Resolution No. 85-12 outlines the results of the Primary Election of March 26, 1985, with a total of 19 question ballots, 4 of which were counted and reflected in the returns, 15 of which were not counted for various reasons. Each one of the 15 people will be contacted by the Pinal County and advised why their ballots were not counted. Councilman Taylor wished to know the percentage of registered voters that voted in the election Ms Connelly informed the Council that 26 9% of the registered voters voted. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 85-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, CONDUCTING AND ACCEPTING THE OFFICIAL CANVASS OF VOTES FOR THE CITY PRIMARY ELECTION HELD MARCH 26, 1985, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried ADJOURNMENT Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 6 54 P M osikk "INN Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. [i ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1985, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APfiCHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk f1 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 1, 1985 �-� CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 2, 1985 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on April 2, 1985, at the Apache Junction JOIN City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m INVOCATION Vice Mayor Eidson led the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Taylor, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Hill, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke ( Staff Present: City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Controller Keith Lewis Representing Director of Planning, Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Public Works Rich Braman Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori V. Clark Others Present* Mr. Harry Cook Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. John Hennesy 1020 W. Roundup Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Ms Norma Dingman Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Paul Connolly 1935 S. Cactus Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Jerry Lawrence Blue Cross/Blue Shield tr--ir ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 1 AND 2 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous �\ The motion carried Introduction of Distinguished Guests and Visitors None AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS None. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Michael J. McNulty reported that the final plans for Pinal Street drainage project have been received and bids will be opened and submitted to Council the first meeting in May, and that two City police officers were awarded bronze medals for the State-wide Police Olympics, Lieutenant Scott for racketball, and Officer Salmon in bicycling. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 344, PZ-71-84, COOK Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa briefed the Council on the application for rezoning from GR General ormik Rural and Trailer Homesite located on the northeast corner of Roundup Street and Thunderbird Drive in Section 17, for which 4 protest petitions have been filed against One of the petitions had not been notarized or listed as property owners within the 300 feet of the site and anothers property is outside the 150 foot area The remaining two petitioners constitute 47.3% of the area within 150 feet of the subject site Mr Harry Cook, applicant, requested approval of the rezoning Mr John Hennesy, 1020 W. Roundup, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in opposition to the application Ms Norma Dingman, opposed the application and more trailer parks. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the petition. There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 2 Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 344, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF T-E CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-71-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor Councilman Taylor, Vice Mayor Eidson, Mayor Clarke Opposed: Councilman Damiano, Councilman Hill, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Baljo City Clerk Kathleen Connelly declared that due to a lack of three-quarter vote in favor, the motion failed. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 345, PZ-72-84, HAMM ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mr Nakagawa briefed the Council on the application for rezoning from General Rural to Trailer Homesite of a 1.3 acre parcel, located on the east side of Cedar Drive, 165 feet north of Roundup Street in Section 18. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application Mrs Bob Hamm, applicant, requested approval as they wished to place three houses on the property There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Planning staff has no objections and that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval with the stipulations that the rights-of-way be dedicated and that the property not be developed into an RV or mobile home park Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 345 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 345, by title only City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 4 ormik ORDINANCE NO. 345, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-72-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. .00mk Vice Mayor Eidson asked if three houses can be placed on this parcel. Mr. Nakagawa replied to the affirmative. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 345, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-72-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 346, PZ-73-84, HARDY Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa addressed the rezoning application from General Rural to C-4 Heavy Commercial District of a 7.719 acre parcel, located on the south side of Highway 60 between Royal Palm and Tomahawk Roads at the northeast corner of Palm Springs Subdivision in Section 28. Mr Paul Connolly, 1935 S Cactus, Apache Junction, representing the applicant, requested approval of the application. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations. Mr. Nakagawa stated that there have been two protest petitions filed against this application, one of the petitioners property is outside the 150 foot area, and the other constitutes 5% of the area, but does not require a three-quarter vote as It would need 20% of the area, and that the Planning staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 346 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 .,.::, PAGE 5 VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon tr.e City Clerk to read Ordinance No 346 by title only Amok City Clerk Kathleen Conn_ ly, read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 346, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-73-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-4 HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 346, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-73-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-4 HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Shanks seconded the motion. Councilman Taylor expressed a concern that after trailer sales, this property could be developed into a use with heavy equipment or similar uses Councilman Baljo gave the opinion that this is along Highway 60 and this is the logical area for this zoning VOTE: In Favor: Councilman Shanks, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Taylor, Vice Mayor Eidson Opposed. Councilman Damiano, Councilman Hill, Mayor Clarke The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 347, PZ-74-84, POLK Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Council on the application for rezoning from General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District of a .37 acre parcel, located on east side of Ironwood Drive, approximately 520 feet south of Superstition Boulevard in Section 20 Mr. Tony Vehon, 230 W. Tepee, Apache Junction, representing the applicant, explained that the proposed use is a retail plaza and requested approval of the application. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke called upon the Associate Planner for recommendations REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 6 0011. Mr. Nakagawa stated that the Planning staff has no objection and that the Planning and Zoning Commission also recommends approval. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 347 BY TITLE ONLY, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 347 by title only. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 347, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-74-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 347, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-74-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 363, FOUR-WAY STOP AT IRONWOOD AND SUPERSTITION (With the Emergency Clause) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that traffic counts have been taken at this intersection and it indicated that 11,100 vehicles passed through during a 16 hour period, with an average of 868 vehicles per hour during an 8 hour period and this warrants a four-way stop sign. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the issue. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 363, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 7 oak Vice Mayor Eidson seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. A/\ Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 363, by title only with the emergency clause. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 363, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING A FOUR-WAY STOP AT SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD (UNIVERSITY DRIVE) AND IRONWOOD DRIVE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 363, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING A FOUR-WAY STOP AT SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD (UNIVERSITY DRIVE) AND IRONWOOD DRIVE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Baljo seconded the ( motion. VOTE• Unanimous Il The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 374, ESTABLISHING TWO-WAY STOPS (With the Emergency Clause) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Asoakk Mr. McNulty explained that this ordinance legitimitize two-way stops that have been installed as paving has been done. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the issue Mr. Harvey Morrison, 1834 W. Roundup, Apache Junction, wished to know if there would be residential speed limits on the newly paved streets. Mr. McNulty stated that speed limit signs would be put up where they are required, and any street that does not presently have a sign up is 25 mph, by State law. There being no one else wishing to address the issue, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 374, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 FAGF R /'` r The motion carried. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 374, by title only with the emergency clause City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 374, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING TWO-WAY STOPS AT CORTEZ ROAD AND JUNCTION STREET, CORTEZ ROAD AND EAST 2ND AVENUE, CORTEZ ROAD AND EAST 4TH AVENUE, SOUTHERN AVENUE AND CORTEZ ROAD, APACHE DRIVE AND 20TH AVENUE, COCONINO DRIVE AND 20TH AVENUE, PAPAGO DRIVE AND 20TH AVENUE, WEST 10TH AVENUE AND SOUTH DELAWARE DRIVE AND WEST 13TH AVENUE AND SOUTH DELAWARE DRIVE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 374, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING TWO-WAY STOPS AT CORTEZ ROAD AND JUNCTION STREET, CORTEZ ROAD AND EAST 2ND AVENUE, CORTEZ ROAD AND EAST 4TH AVENUE, SOUTHERN AVENUE AND CORTEZ ROAD, APACHE DRIVE AND 20TH AVENUE, COCONINO DRIVE AND 20TH AVENUE, PAPAGO DRIVE AND 20TH AVENUE, WEST 10TH AVENUE AND SOUTH DELAWARE DRIVE AND WEST 13TH AVENUE AND SOUTH DELAWARE DRIVE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING PENALTIES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED ( motion. Councilman Damiano seconded the VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting. Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting at 8.15 p.m. /"%k APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, KC BAR BQ ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Vice Mayor Eidson expressed his concern over the number of occasions that police officers have been called to this location Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY MS JANE ELLEN MERRYMAN, AGENT FOR KC BAR BQ, BE RECOMMENDED TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL FOR DENIAL, DUE TO POLICE INCIDENT RECORD OF THE BAR OVER THE PAST YEARS. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OMIr. APRIL^2, 1985 Amok APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, LONGHORN SALOON Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor oommik Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY JOSEPH A TAPLEY AGENT FOR THE LONGHORN SALOON BE RECOMMENDED TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL FOR APPROVAL. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. Councilman Taylor asked if there have been police called to the Longhorn Saloon. Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel replied that there have not been problem, but this is just a Person Transfer and not a new license. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. LIBRARY DESIGN Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr McNulty explained that this design was presented to the Council at the previous meeting and is scheduled to be located off Idaho Road, and will also be a Senior/Community Center, and that there was a minor change in the plans to make it more useable, and the building will be expandable as the City grows. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the issue. Mr. Joe Morvak, expressed his views that the new Library building should be functional and not merely a monument or show piece. Mayor Clarke stated that the architect has worked under close staff supervision, and this building will be extremely functional. There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT THE DESIGN PLANS FOR THE NEW PUBLIC LIBRARY/SENIOR-COMMUNITY CENTER BE ACCEPTED Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 10 s Councilman Taylor informed the public that the one person who has spear-headed this project the most is Councilman Damiano and that he should receive recognition for his work. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS SWIMMING POOL IMPROVEMENTS Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell explained that the budget allows for additional expansion and improvements to the swimming pool, including a larger kool deck with seating area and a ramada, an enclosed area for pop machines and a storage area for pool chemicals. Mayor Clarke asked what the next step would be if this were approved Mr. Bell stated that it would be necessary to go out for bid Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT AUTHORIZATION IS GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER AND SUPERINTENDENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES TO PROCEED WITH IMPROVEMENTS AND EXPANSION OF THE COMMUNITY SWIMMING FACILITY Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous ( The motion carried. APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARD OF HEALTH ) City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that the appointments to the City Board of Health and the City Health Officer are statutory requirements §36-165, that they must be appointed in the first meeting in April of each year, two members of ''1 the governing body, with the city engineer and the health officer Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT COUNCILMAN HILL AND COUNCILMAN SHANKS BE APPOINTED TO THE CITY BOARD OF HEALTH. AND THAT DR. DEAN SEEMAN BE APPOINTED AS THE CITY HEALTH OFFICER. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE• In Favor Councilman Baljo, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Hill, Vice Mayor Eidson The motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR CITY HEALTH INSURANCE Mr. McNulty stated that it has become necessary for the City to go for bid for health insurance for employees and recommended that the bid be awarded to Blue Cross/Blue Shield and recognized Mr. Jerry Lawrence to answer any questions. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 11 AIN Mr. Jerry Lawrence, representative of Blue Cross/Blue Shield asked if there were any questions. Vice Mayor Eidson asked when this contract would commence. Mr McNulty stated that the Ask, IF. contract would take effect May 1. Mr Lawrence explained that either the conventional approach or the HMO was available through Blue Cross/Blue Shield. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT THE BID FOR CITY HEALTH INSURANCE BE AWARDED TO BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD, EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 1985. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR COMPACT UTILITY TRACTOR Mr Bell asked that this be postponed. Due to a problem with the specifications on the bid, the bid would have to be advertised again. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT ITEM NO. 16 BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 7, 1985 Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. /►. AWARD OF BID FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES Controller Keith Lewis stated that the bid opening was April 1, 1985, for a printer and 4 display stations and 3 personal computers, and recommended that the bid be awarded to IBM in the amount of $16,912.77, and Phoenix Computer Group for the printer at $2700.00. Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT THE BID FOR THE COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES BE AWARDED TO IBM IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,912 77 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE OPEN DATA PRINTER WHICH SHALL BE AWARDED TO PHOENIX COMPUTER GROUP IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,700 00 Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 12 AWARD OF BID FOR REMITTANCE CONTROL TERMINALS Mr Lewis explained that this is a type of cash register, and that two bids were received and recommended that the bid be awarded to Copperstate Business Systems in the amount of $10,661 40. Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT �� THE BID FOR REMITTANCE CONTROL TERMINALS BE AWARDED TO COPPERSTATE BUSINESS SYSTEMS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,661.40 Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR PROPERTY CLEAN-UP, SUN UNLIMITED ) Ms Connelly stated that Roger Grim at the Council meeting of February 19, 1985, Mr. Grimh was granted a 30 day extension to clean the property in question, and is now requesting an extension until he has information regarding a rezoning, and upon checking with the Planning Department, Mr. Grimh has not filed a rezoning application. Councilman Taylor stated that there have been verbal complaints regarding this property. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT A FINAL EXTENSION BE GRANTED TO ROGER GRIMH OF SUN UNLIMITED TO BRING PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH CITY REGULATIONS OF 30 DAYS, TO EXPIRE ON MAY 2, 1985. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. Ammik ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION OF SUPERVISOR OF DISPATCHER ) Mr. McDaniel stated that when the Administrative Sergeant was promoted to Lieutenant the position of Supervisor of Communications personnel was left vacant and was dropped from the budget, and requested that this position be reinstated as it will be necessary with the future implementation of the 911 Emergency System and training of dispatchers. Mayor Clarke asked if this would be a present employee. Mr. McDaniel stated that it would be a promotional position Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT THE REQUEST BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO ESTABLISH THE POSITION OF "COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR" IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BE APPROVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 13 The motion carried. EXPIRATION OF TERMS, RESIGNATION FROM AND APPOINTMENTS TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Mr Bell informed the Council that Mr Ted Millspaugh has resigned from the Parks and Recreation 'auk Commission and that of three terms expiring, two members are inter- ested in continuing to serve on the Commission. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MR. TED MILLSPAUGH BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET; AND THAT JUDD WILLIAMS BE APPOINTED TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF MR. MILLSPAUGH, SAID TERM TO EXPIRE APRIL 1, 1987; AND THAT CHUCK HEERMANS, AND JANICE PALSON ALSO BE APPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, TO FILL EXPIRED TERMS, WITH NEW TERMS TO EXPIRE APRIL 1, 1988. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. Councilman Damiano read the following letter "Honorable Mayor and Council Members, Please accept this letter of resignation from the City's Parks and Recreation Commission I have been offered a promotional opportunity from my employer and will be relocating to the Pinetop/Lakeside area I have enjoyed serving on the Commission and feel the Commission and staff are dedicated in providing the City of Apache Junction an outstanding Parks and Recreation program Good luck in the future. Sincerely, Ted Millspaugh" olook VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT BOARD Ms Connelly explained that this is a statutory requirement that a City must maintain a local board which administers the Public Safety Retirement system, which must consist of the Mayor as Chairman, two members elected from among the Police Department, and two citizen members. Ms Connelly stated that there is a vacancy from the Police Department and Mr. William Arnold's term expired March 4th. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT OFFICER LARRY BALL AS A POLICE DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE, AND WILLIAM ARNOLD AS A CITIZEN MEMBER, BE APPOINTED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT BOARD, SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE MARCH 4, 1989 Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 A PAGE 14 The motion carried. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY SUBMITTED BY LONNIE STONE Mr McNulty explained that this claim was submitted by the attorney for Mr. Lonnie Stone, involving an accident at the intersection of Route 88 and U.S. Highway 60, for which the City does not admit any liability, and recommended that the Council deny the claim which should properly be filed against the State of Arizona Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT THE CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY SUBMITTED BY LONNIE STONE IS REJECTED Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. WORK SESSION, APRIL 15, 1985 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, APRIL 16, 1985 Vice Mayor Eidson MOVED THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 15, 1985, AT 7.00 P M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 16, 1985, AT 6 00 P.M Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. CALL TO THE PUBLIC None. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) None REQUESTS OF COUNCIL None. ADJOURNMENT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8 59 P.M. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 PAGE 15 /ak 1111"73 Consent Agenda Items were as follows: *1. Acceptance of the Regular Agenda *2. Acceptance of the Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 19, 1985 ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1985, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY—()UNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk oak REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 2, 1985 �_j °' PAGE 16 Ilook Q p,ChF 0 P s` 2 ffif;; ka =kr U z q,91zowx c/J �it a `4Gp cache unction � DATE: APRIL 8, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER J i,I ; FROM: VICE CHAIRMAN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTE�� REGARDING: AB-85-02 (Desert View from Greasewood to Superstition) Extinguishment of Federally Patented Easement The Development Coordinating Committee reviewed the above application on April 4, 1985 and expresses no objection for the following reasons: 1 . The roadways ahave never been opened or maintained by the City for public use. 2. The roadway is a local classification. 3. The use of property by the owners would be enhanced. 4. Adequate access to public and private rights—of—ways would remain available. 5. Area transportation circulation would not be adversely affected. 6. Majority of property owners desire abandonment. Ap;,rov^r fcr Agenda r?--- D,.to Item # r hioarirtg ::.;sinness New Business V Consent Agenda KWB:TH File # AB-85-02 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 /"1 PQACHE k ,„ ter „V{ K oz ,1/1/zo NP � il o 'nache unction Olmlk DATE: APRIL 8, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL '1 THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK ;\ i:. / REGARDING: AB-85-02 RESOLUTION NO. 85214 EXTINGUISHMENT OF FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT (AGENDA ITEM) GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANTS: Jerry Burgess, Erhardt Legler PARCLES: 100-40-03, 100-40-4, 100-40-24, 100-40-25, 100-40-05, 100-40-19D STREETS REQUESTED: Desery View Drive between Greasewood Street and Superstition Boulevard. STREET CONDITION: Not opened or maintained by the City. Property owners have access from other right-of-ways and private easements. D.C.C. RECOMMENDATION: See memorandum dated April 4, 1985 attached. RWB:th File # AB-85-02 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 RESOLUTION NO. 85-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES DESERT VIEW FROM GREASEWOOD STREET TO SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-85-02 IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHEREAS, the requested abandonment is a federally patented easement described as parcels of land located in a portion of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows Parcel No. 1 The East thirty-three (33') feet of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 18 Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Basin and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona: EXCEPT the North thrity-three (33') feet; and EXCEPT the South fifty (50') feet thereof. Parcel No 2 The West thirty-three (33') feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona- EXCEPT the North thirty-three (33') feet, and EXCEPT the South fifty (50') feet thereof WHEREAS, the abandonments requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, or have access by a Federally Patented Easement which may in the future be developed; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, finds that these said Federally Patented Easements for public rights-of- way purposes as described herein are classified as local streets on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan are no longer necessary for public use as roadways, and WHEREAS, these said easements requested for abandonment have never been improved as public roadways and maintained by a local governing agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above described Federally Patented Easements reserved for public rights-of-way purposes are hereby abandonment and extinguished as present or future public rights-of-way. BE IT FRUTHER RESOLVED that the abandonment of the public rights- of-way has no effect on reservations for public utility easements. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1985 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. David F. Alexander City Attorney AB-85-02 SEC 18 I�- ROUNDUP ST O 0 33' 66' 33' Jam\ OT O8 O O Il 12 , 0 13 14 15 16 IT 18 w 0 0 GREASEW00D ST w w 19 19 19 19 0/ 0 J n ______ aivHT- Iv@______� 20 0 21 10 0 0 /1/ 0 SUPERSTITION BLVD PROPOSED ABANDONMENT O ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. SCALE I" = 200' ' `U a Z 'IRiZONP cO.2l & pacheunction ,....' April 11 , 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: 0` • j CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF PORTIONS OF OHIO AND CODY STREETS, AB-85-03 These two streets are dead-ends. They were put in with the original intent to continue west. However, a subdivision was approved that did not provide for their continuation. Since they are public rights-of-way, they are a continuing problem to the City (maintenance) , abbutting property owners (traffic into the dead-ends) , and therefore it is my recommendation that they be abandoned to the property owners as not being necessary to the City's street system. MJMc/lvc Approver for Agenda 1:6- - - 4 gate _ Item 0 First Reading "1//rA3 -5 Second Reading Public Hearing Old Business New Business ✓ Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 r__sr RESOLUTION NO. 85-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN RIGHT-OF- WAY ON OHIO STREET FROM THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON PINYON DRIVE TO THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 2 BLOCK 3 AND LOT 1 BLOCK 6, AND ON CODY STREET (CENTURY STREET) FROM THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON PINYON STREET TO THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 2 BLOCK 6 AND LOT 1 BLOCK 7 AS RECORDED IN PUEBLO DEL SOL - A SUBDIVISION OF RECORD IN PINAL COUNTY RECORDERS BOOK 9 PAGE 4 AND AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-85-03 ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY VACATED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE RIGHT- OF-WAYS CONDITIONED UPON PROVISIONS FOR UTILITY EASEMENTS. WHEREAS, the requested abandonment is a dedication for public rights- of-way purposes described as these parcels of land located in Section 19, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows Parcels No. 1 That portion of Ohio Street in Pueblo Del Sol, a subdivision in Book 9 Page 4, Pinal County Recorder, 'ying West of the Westerly right-of-way line of Pinyon Drive, Northerly of Lot 1 Block 6 and Southerly of Lot 2, Block 3. Parcel No 2 That parcel of Cody Street in Pueblo Del Sol, a subdivision as recorded in Book 9 Page 4 Pinal County Recorder lying Southerly of Lot 2 Block 6, Northerly of Lot 1 Block 7 and West of the Westerly right-of-way line of Pinyon Drive described as follows. Beginning at the North Point of curvature at the Southeast corner of Lot 2 Block 6; Thence cortinue Southerly along the extension of the exact property line of said Lot 2 to the centerline of Cody Street (Century Street), Thence continue Southeasterly to the South point of curvature of the North corner of Lot 1 Block 7. WHEREAS, the vacation requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, or have access by a federally patented easement which may in the future be developed; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona finds that this said dedication for public rights-of-way purposes as described herein is classified as a local street on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan and is no longer necessary for public use as a roadway and WHEREAS, this said dedication requested for vacation has been improved as a public roadway and maintained by a local governing agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above described dedication reserved for public rights-of-way purposes is hereby vacated as present or future public rights-of-way and deleted from City maintenance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the vacation of the public rights-of- way is conditioned upon providing public utility easements as described in attachments "A" and "B". /0016, Amok RESOLUTION NO. 85-13 PAGE TWO PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1985. „oak Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. David F Alexander City Attorney L ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / ?),D) • 3 ITEM /IS MEETING OF g/0 6 MOTION BY: wuwy SECONDED BY: -Atif1)-L YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS - 1 COUNCILMAN BAt in VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL .MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"I.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL AalIhk. "Ink r ACHE✓G /4 n! � Z U -T =.: f "4PizoNP `�Dity o pac/zeunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 9, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL -1 THROUGH: /i'1ICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER 1/ (.;FROM: j ''; JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ,iiSUBJECT' AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 PZ-51-83 (Rainbow Valley) This is a Planned Development time extension request for Rainbow Valley by Alfred Bellucci . This project is a 20-acre, 200-lot, recreational vehicle subdivision on the southwest corner of Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Ironwood Drive. The Preliminary PD was approved by the City Council on July 3, 1984. Attached is the applicant' s letter identifying his reasons for the request. He believes more time will be needed in order to receive final PD approval . Staff is supportive of his request. Recommended Motion I MOVE that a one-year time extension for PZ-51-83 is hereby (approved) (denied) to allow the applicant time to submit the final plan to the Building Department for City Council approval . This time extension will expire on July 3, 1986. JAN:mas 1% Approver for Agenda Date Ite # First Readi'g e/e (!' Second R.edirg Puy.',;, Hearing Old Business New Business ‘," Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 4"'C y� ifti64-445NMAI RE AL TOR' 6090 Redwood uoulev3rd TELEPHONE MAILING ADDRESS P 0 BOX 615 Novato California 94947 897-9666 April 5, 1985 City of Apache Junction ATTN: Mr. Nakagawa [APR ((.; '1.`c_;5 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85520 EL.: 1. OF FLANN;NG Dear Mr. Nakagawa, Regarding our most recent telephone conversation pertaining to Rainbow Valley R.V. Park located at Ironwood and Lost Dutchman. The zoning was approved last June , I don't have the exact date but I am sure you do. We would like to ask for an extension on said zoning for one year from the date of the final approval for the following reasons: 1 This property was sold under an option agreement. The buyers were to handle all engineering and architectural planning. Unfortunately it was several months into the first year before we could take over the contractual agreements with the engineers and architects after the default of the buyers. 2. The architects have been working on this project for sometime and have in fact submitted to the City the improvement plans. We are waiting now for comments from staff. (I understand this should be done in a couple �. of weeks.) 3. The plans and specifications for the park and the sewer system are being sent to the State for their approval. How long this will take, I don' t know. 4. The plans and specifications for the building are still being worked on by the architects. We hope to have them complete in 30 to 60 days. It is obvious that we will run out of time before everything can be approved by the City and the State. We trust you will grant our request. We would like to have a hearing before the 26th of April, as I will be in Apache Junction until then. Sincerely, LPL�f i � 6(c C� Al Bellucci Ed Grundstrom cTS _ -IC AlPizo - its o� C pac�ie �unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 25, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: L-. MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER b FROM: `,e,tiCHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 RESOLUTION NO. 84-55 Background Resolution No. 84-55 declares the Uniform Sign Code, 1982 edition as a public record. This Uniform Sign Code is referred to in Ordinance No. 292 (PZ-33-84; Sign Code) as the document which sets forth the design and construction standards to be used for all signs in the City. Adoption of Resolution No. 84-55 should precede adoption of Ordinance No. 292. CRN.mas All lk, Approver for Agenda ��' Date Item # First Reading _// 7• 7 Second Reading - Public Hearing - Old Business - New Business _.Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 Gros RESOLUTION NO 84-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED UNIFORM SIGN CODE, 1982 EDITION, PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS WHICH WILL BE ADDED TO THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE. [ BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that. 1 That certain document entitled Uniform Sign Code, 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials, three (3) copies of which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, are hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with the City Clerk 2. That certain document entitled Uniform Sign Code, 1982 Edition, published by the International Conference of Building Officials, contains twenty-nine (29) pages, numbered 1-29 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Day ex e City Attorney L (--- h l Z -1PizoNP i�� pacheunction April 10, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK / SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 85-15 (POLICE POLICIES) Due to amendments in the policies and procedures manual for the police department, it is necessary to re-adopt the entire document to include all of the changes. The attached resolution declares the document as an item of public record, eliminating the need to have the entire manual published as an ordinance. A public hearing on the actual adoption of the document (Proposed Ordinance No. 372) will be held under the Public Hearing section of the agenda. Please contact the Director of Public Safety if you have any questions on this policy manual . kmc Approver for Agenda ,e-e.-- Date Item # First 2.'?..Ex, if; /rCv/ --- v Seu^^ ' <<- i;ng . ;.': ,,':1C hearing Cid Business NeN Business . C sent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 wp^-s RESOLUTION NO. 85-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED POLICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. 1. That certain document entitled Police Policies and Procedures, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk , is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are to remain on file with the City Clerk 2 That certain document entitled Police Policies and Procedures, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, contains Chapter 1, Sections 1 00 - 1 05 Chapter 2, Sections 2.00 - 2.17 Chapter 3, Sections 3.00 - 3.34 Chapter 4, Sections 4 00 - 4 33 Chapter 5, Sections 5 00 - 5 92 Chapter 6, Sections 6 00 - 6 21 Chapter 7, Sections 7.00 - 7.05 Chapter 8, Sections 8 00 - 8 44 one (1) page of preamble and one (1) page of Law Enforcement Code of Ethics PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1985. WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F ALEXANDER City Attorney RESOLUTION NO 85-15 PAGE ONE OF ONE ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES f-0 4(7 VAv ITEM # MEETING OF b0Aki MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR I- COUNCILMALEILL v COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE_MAYQR FIDSON £ ANO COUNCILMAN BALJO __MAYOR_CLARKF I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAIiNED TOTAL eIN egiS eiN AMENDED MOTION: ITEMS 1 - 8 I MOVE THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED AFTER REMOVING ITEM NO. 5 FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND PLACING IT UNDER NEW BUSINESS. C! ITEM NOS. 1-8 I MOVE THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 THROUGH 8 BE APPROVED AND ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 292, SIGN CODE 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , �c r ACHE.4o 4'' U Z qR .,,,,. `pity c ` act e �unctacn izo/ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 27, 1985 f MEMORANDUM TOi.. ,HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL i THROUGH. ,�/M CHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: CK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 PZ-33-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 292) - SIGN CODE Background The proposed Sign Code represents an almost twelve-month effort which began with the work of the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee and Mr. Nakagawa to produce the first draft (based largely on Mesa's Sign Code) for presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission held four work sessions and two public hearings on the Code , the product of which is Ordinance No. "92 in its present form as included in your packet. This Code differs from that which was proposed by the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee in only a few minor amendments and one major difference: it does not contain an abatement schedule for nonconforming signs. The Arizona Supreme Court ruled against such an abatement schedule which the City of Scottsdale tried to implement, and our City Attorney has advised against including such a schedule in our Code. I would like to point out that through the work sessions and public hearings, the Commission did study very carefully the input from sign and billboard companies, the local business community (through the Chamber of Commerce) , interested citizens, and the Rewrite Committee, and amended the draft as they felt appropriate. Since the Code is a very detailed, complicated set of regulations, I have included a summary of "Major Provisions" and "Sign Requirements by Zoning District" in your packet. Approver for Agenda, Al.--?—' pate Item # First Reading 0,'l-f'> 2 Second R^cd•rg Publ:c Hearing - Old Business New Business -Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 Honorable Mayor and City Council Agenda Item - April 16, 1985 PZ-33-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 292) Page Two The prohibition against off-site advertising has been one of the most controversial issues of the Code and one which the outdoor advertising industry has been adamantly opposed to, naturally. To their credit, they have proposed regulations to permit billboards, but with some standards for height, spacing, etc. Enclosed in your packet is a letter from Mr. Michael Turner with Gannett Outdoor proposing billboard standards. Based on these standards submitted, and additional requirements which I feel would be appropriate, should the Council desire to amend Ordinance No. 292 to permit billboards, enclosed is some possible wording for your consideration as well as wording which would permit temporary off-site subdivision directional signs. The Commission did discuss these possible amendments, but chose not to include them in the Code. Planning Department Recommendation It is the Planning Department's recommendation to adopt the proposed Sign Code with any amendments the Council feels would be in the community interest. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of March 26, 1985, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Jorgensen 5-2-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona , that case PZ-33-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 292, the ' Sign Code of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, ' is recommended to the Apache Junction City Council for approval without any amendments. The reasons for this recommendation are• 1. The adoption of this Code will help to realize the General Plan 's goals to upgrade the community's visual image, promote a low-profile growth form, and protect the natural setting. 2. The economic well-being of the community will be enhanced by effective sign controls. 3. The Sign Code as is being submitted is a year' s work of a citizens' committee (the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee) which represents a cross-section of the City of Apache Junction, and it was unanimously recommended by this Committee to be forwarded to the City Council in it' s present form without amendments. " CRN:mas SIGN CODE: MAJOR PROVISIONS 1 . No off-site advertising (billboards) . 2. Detached signs to be low profile (8' maximum height) . 3 Setbacks for detached signs: 0' or 5 ' from an interior lot line. 4. Provides that Uniform Sign Code governs design and construction. 5. Planning and Zoning Commission can issue Conditional Use Permits for signs larger , higher , or greater in number than provided for in the Code. 6. Board of Adjustment can authorize variances. 7. Special provisions for dealing with non-conforming signs. SIGN REQUIREMENTS BY ZONING DISTRICTS ZONING DISTRICT NUMBER OF SIGNS LOCATION AREA Single Family 1 per dwelling wall, archi- 2 sq. ft. tectural feature, low profile 2 per subdivision low profile 32 sq ft Multi-Family 1 per dwelling wall, archi- 2 sq ft tectural feature, low /\ profile 1 per complex wall, archi- 32 sq. ft tectural feature, low profile Mobile Home/ 1 per dwelling wall, archi- 2 sq ft RV Parks tectural feature, low profile 2 per park wall, archi- 32 sq ft tectural feature, low profile Commercial *1 1 per lot detached (low 1 sq ft. per *2 profile) lineal street frontage (200 sq ft. max ) 2 per occupancy attached 2 sq. ft. per front door of occupancy (200 sq. ft. max ) Industrial *2 1 per lot detached (low 1 sq. ft per profile) lineal street frontage (200 sq ft. max.) 2 per occupancy attached 3 sq ft per front ft *1 Commercial centers or shopping centers may apply for a Conditional Use Permit to provide a signage plan which may be more appropriate for their development. omok *2 Corner lots or buildings allowed maximum number and area for each frontage ,....... ...., r,GAN4E11 RECEIVED MAR la 1985 March 8, 1985 DEPT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Mr. Charles R. Newcomer Planning Director City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Re: Apache Junction Billboard Ordinance Dear Mr. Newcomer. After reviewing the comments of February 21 , 1985, we have modified our proposal as follows: 1 . Spacing. 4A9' (600' ) between billboards on same side of street. 2. Height: 25' height standard with a variance procedure for taller sign locations. 3. Size of Sign Face: 300 square feet with a variance procedure for larger sizes. 4. Support Columns: No more than two support columns. 5. Allowable Zones: Billboards allowed in the commercial and industrial zones. .-. 6. Setbacks: If a billcoard structure or sign face is within 100' of a building, the billboard must maintain the same setback to the front of the building. 7. Exposed Structural Elements (Columns, Bracing, and Backs of Sign Faces): All structural elements and backs of sign faces painted in earth tone colors. I look forward to a productive meeting on March 14, 1985 at 6 30 p.m. Si\erely, (// / S 4 _____ M c, ael Turner Vice President/Community Relations AMT.sga 4li.0:4 Gannett Outdoor Co of Arizona 2502 N Black Canyon Highway ii PO Box 934 Phoenix Arizona 85009 1894 GAZNETT Phoenix Arizona 85001 0934 (602)272 6811 BILLBOARDS Off-site signs may be allowed by Conditional Use Permit by the Planning and Zoning Commission (City Council?) . Term of the permit shall be limited to ( ) . Plans submitted shall include landscaping plans and color schemes for exposed structural elements. No Conditional Use Permit for an off-site sign shall be issued unless the following minimum standards are p met (additional conditions as deemed appropriate by the Planning and Zoning Commission may be imposed) : a) Said signs shall be located only in the CB-2, C-3, C-4, and industrial zoning districts. b) Minimum spacing between billboards shall be six hundred feet (600' ) . c) Maximum height shall be twenty-five feet (25' ) (unless special circumstances warrant a greater height) . d) Maximum size of sign face shall be three hundred (300) square feet (unless special circumstances warrant a larger size) . e) No more than two (2) support columns shall be permitted. f) Said signs shall be located in accord with the setback requirements of the zoning district in which located. In addition, no part of such sign shall be erected closer to a street than the front line of any building which is within one hundred feet (100' ) of the sign . g) (Permit on undeveloped property only?) TEMPORARY SUBDIVISION DIRECTIONAL SIGNS There may be two (2) temporary signs placed on property other than that to which the public is directed, designed and erected to the purpose of directing the public to a recorded residential subdivision for the sale of homes or lots therein; subject to the following: a) Each sign shall not exceed an area of thirty-two (32) square feet, nor a height of ten feet (10' ) . b) Said signs shall not be erected within ten feet (10' ) of the public right-of-way. c) No such sign shall be within one hundred feet (100' ) of a residence. d) Illumination shall be indirect. e) The sign copy shall be limited to the names or symbols of the developer and the subdivision and travel directions. f) The signs shall be removed within four (4) years or after all lots in the subdivision are sold, whichever occurs first. g) (Allowable only within a certain distance of the subdivision?) Example• 1 mile. h) (Permitted only on undeveloped land?) ORDINANCE NO 292 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING "THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE," BY AMENDING "ARTICLE 21", REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING /1 PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL "The Code of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Volume II, Land Development Code, Chapter 1, Zoning Ordinance," shall be amended by amending "Article 21" to read as follows "ARTICLE 21 SECTION 21 00 SIGN CODE SECTION 21.01 TITLE SECTION 21.02 PURPOSE SECTIONS 21.03- 06 INTERPRETATION AND SCOPE SECTIONS 21.07-.10 EXCEPTIONS, PROHIBITED SIGNS, AND SIGNS NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT SECTION 21 11 DEFINITIONS SECTIONS 21 12- 23 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTIONS 21.24- 28 PERMITTED SIGNS BY ZONING DISTRICT SECTIONS 21.29-.33 TEMPORARY SIGNS SECTIONS 21 34-.35 OFF-SITE SIGNS (BILLBOARDS) SECTIONS 21 36-.37 NONCONFORMING SIGNS AND USES SECTIONS 21.38- 42 PERMITS SECTIONS 21.43-.46 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS SECTIONS 21.47-.51 VARIANCES AND APPEALS SECTION 21 52 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 21.53- 55 SIGN MAINTENANCE SECTIONS 21.56-.60 ENFORCEMENT Section 21.01 TITLE This Article, in conjunction with the "Uniform Sign Code," shall be known as the "Sign Code of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona." Section 21.02 PURPOSE The purpose of this Code regulating signs of all types is to. (a) preserve and protect the public health, safety, and welfare within the City of Apache Junction; (b) encourage development of private property in harmony with the desired character of the City while providing due regard for the public and private interests involved, (c) to promote the effectiveness of signs by preventing their overconcentration, improper placement, and excessive size; (d) to enhance the flow of traffic and convenience, ease, and enjoyment of travel within the City, (e) to protect travelers in the City from injury or damage as a result of distraction or obstruction of vision attributable to faulty construction or improper situation of signs within the City; (f) to accomplish the City's General Plan goal of creating a safe and attractive community environment; (g) assure that public benefits derived from expenditure of public funds for the improvement and beautification of streets and other public structures and spaces shall be protected by exercising reasonable controls over the character and design of private structures; and (h) to provide an improved visual environment for the citizens r and visitors to the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. SECTIONS 21.03- 06 INTERPRETATION AND SCOPE - .ram �s Section 21.03 The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for the inter- pretation of the Sign Code. His decisions may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment. Section 21.04 The most current edition, adopted for use by the City of Apache Junction, of the Uniform Sign Code published by the International Conference of Building Officials and the standards and provisions /11, contained therein are incorporated as part of this Code. Where a conflict exists between the provisions of this Code and the Uniform Sign Code, the provisions of this Code shall apply. For items not specifically addressed by this Code, any applicable provision of the Uniform Sign Code shall apply Section 21.05 Where there is a conflict between the provisions of the Sign Code and provisions of other regulations of the City of Apache Junction, the more restrictive shall apply Section 21 06 The provisions of this Code shall apply to the erection, construction, alteration, use, location, and maintenance of all signs within the City of Apache Junction, except as specified in Sections 21.07- 10. SECTIONS 21 07- 10 EXCEPTIONS, PROHIBITED SIGNS, AND SIGNS NOT REQUIRING A PERMIT Section 21 07 Exceptions The provisions of this Code shall not apply to Flags, pennants, or insignias of any nation, state, county, city, or other political unit. b. Tablets, grave markers, headstones, statuary, or remembrances of persons or events noncommercial in nature c. Works of fine art when not displayed in conjunction with a commercial enterprise which may derive direct commercial gain from such display d Temporary decorations or displays celebrating the occasion of traditional accepted patriotic, religious, or local holidays or events. e. Temporary signs for events of a general city-wide civic or public benefit f Signs not visible beyond the boundaries of the lot or parcel upon which they are located, or from any public right-of-way or thoroughfare, providing that such sign does not constitute a traffic hazard. g. The erection, construction, and maintenance of official traffic, fire, and police signs, signals, and devices and markings of the State of Arizona, and of the City of Apache Junction, or any authorized public agency, nor the posting of notices as required by law h. Nonilluminated directional or informational signs of a ORDINANCE NO 292 PAGE 1 of 21 WITMOr public or quasi-public nature, but not including directions to commercial establishment, which do not exceed six (6) square feet Section 21.08 Prohibited Signs Signs which are prohibited under this Code, except as noncon- forming uses, include a "A" frames and portable signs of any nature, other than provided in Sections 21 29- 33 of this Code { b. Outlining of a building by means of exposed neon tubing, ((( exposed incandescent lighting, or other exposed artificial lighting c. Vehicle signs; except for standard advertising or identification markings which are painted on or permanently attached to a business or commercial vehicle d The use of a fixed balloon as a sign. The term "fixed balloon" shall mean any lighter than air or gas filled balloon attached by a rope or teather to a fixed place; except as provided in Section 21 07(d) and (e) Section 21.09 In no case shall any sign a. Be animated, audible, rotate, or have intermittent or flashing illumination Exempt from this provision are electric public message changes b. Be located within five feet (5') of an interior property line. c Be erected in a public easement or right-of-way or project into a public easement or right-of-way. d. Be erected in a location prohibited by this Code. e. Be erected so as to prevent free ingress to or egress from any door or window, or any other exitway required by the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, or by the Fire Department Regulations f. Be attached to any public utility pole, or structure, light pole, lamp, lamp post, tree, fire hydrant, bridge, curb, sidewalk, or other surface located on public property g Be attached to a standpipe, gutter drain, or fire escape, nor shall any sign be erected so as to impair access to the roof of any building or structure h Be erected in any location where by reason of its location will obstruct the view of any authorized traffic sign, signal, or other traffic control device. Nor may any sign by reason of its shape, position, or color interfere with or be confused with any authorized traffic sign or device. No sign shall be erected in a location where it will obstruct vision of the public right-of-way to the vehicle operator during ingress to, egress from, or while traveling on said public right-of-way Further, on any corner lot, no sign shall be erected or maintained within twenty feet (20') of the property corner so as to interfere with traffic ORDINANCE NO 292 PAGE 3 of 21 swommir ormiN visibility across the corner. i. Operate or employ any stereoptican or motion picture projection or media in conjunction with any advertisements or have visible moving parts or any portion of which moves or gives the illusion of motion, except as permitted in this Code j Emit audible sound, odor, or visible matter Section 21.10 Signs Not Requiring a Permit The following signs shall not require a sign permit. These exceptions shall not be construed as relieving the owner of the sign from the responsibility of its erection and maintenance, and its compliance with the provisions of this Code or any other law or ordinance regulating the same a. Name plates. b. One (1) sign per house, two (2) square feet or less in a single-family residential district giving the occupant's name and/or house number c. The changing of advertising copy or message on a painted or printed sign only. Except for movie theatre marquees and similar signs specifically designed for the use of replaceable copy, electric signs shall not be included in this exemption. d Standard sign maintenance including painting, repainting, or cleaning of an advertising structure, or the changing of the advertising copy or message thereon, unless a structural change is made e. Temporary signs as permitted in Sections 21 29(a) and 21.31(a) of this Code f. Signs erected during the Christmas holidays as identification of temporary sales areas for Christmas trees and other holiday items, such signs shall not be erected before Thanksgiving Day, and shall be removed prior to New Year's Day SECTION 21.11 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Code, certain words and terms are defined as follows: Words used in the present tense include the future; words in the singular number include the plural, and words in the plural include the singular number. The word "shall" is mandatory and not permissive; the word "person" includes individuals, partnerships, corporations, clubs, or associations. ABANDONED SIGN shall mean a sign which no longer correctly directs or exhorts any person, advertises a bona fide business, lessor, owner, product, or activity conducted, or product available on the premises where such sign is displayed. ACTION SIGN shall mean the movement of the sign body or any segment thereof such as rotating, revolving, moving up and down or any other [ type of action involving a change in position of the sign body or Lsegment thereof whether caused by mechanical or other means ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 4 of 21 OrmMr ANIMATED SIGN shall mean the movement of any light used in connection with any sign such as blinking, traveling, flaring, or changing degree of intensity of any light movement other than burning continuously ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTION shall mean a marquee, porch, canopy, or other similar architectural projection extending beyond the floor area. ATTACHED SIGN shall mean any sign which is fastened, attached, connected, or supported in whole or in part by a building or structure other than a sign structure which is supported wholly by the ground. Amok BANNER shall mean a temporary sign of fabric, plastic, paper, or other ( light pliable material not enclosed in a rigid frame, but mounted so as to allow movement of the sign by atmospheric conditions. BLOCK shall mean at least six hundred feet (600' ) of street frontage including right-of-way. BOARD shall mean the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction CHANGE PANEL SIGN shall mean a sign designed to permit immediate change of copy which may be other than the name of the business. CITY shall mean the City of Apache Junction, Arizona COMBINATION SIGN shall mean any sign incorporating any combination of wall, projecting, detached signs, and roof signs. COUNCIL shall mean the City Council of the City of Apache Junction CURB LINE shall mean the line at the face of the curb nearest the street or roadway. In the absence of a curb, the curb line shall be established by the City Engineer. DETACHED SIGN shall mean any sign supported wholly by the ground or by a structure in the ground (pole sign) DIRECT LIGHTING shall mean a sign designed to provide artificial light through exposed lighting on the sign face, such as neon DIRECTORY SIGN shall mean a sign designed to show the relative locations of the several commercial activities within a shopping center or other multi-tenant development. ofmk ELECTRIC SIGN shall mean any sign or advertising device containing electrical wiring, but not including signs illuminated by exterior light source EMBELLISHMENT shall mean letters, figures, characters, or represen- tations in cutouts or irregular forms or similar ornamentation whether or not attached to, affixed to, or superimposed upon advertising signs. FASCIA shall mean a parapet type wall used as part of the fascia of a flat roofed building and projecting not more than six feet (6') from the building face immediately adjacent thereto. Such a wall shall enclose at least three (3) sides of the projecting flat roof and return to a parapet wall or the building. FLASHING SIGN shall mean an illuminated sign which exhibits changing 1 light or color effect by blinking or any other means so as to provide inconstant illumination. ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 5 of 21 wr FREEWAY shall mean a highway in respect to which the owners of the abutting lands have no right or easement of access to or from their abutting properties, or in respect to which such owners have only limited or restricted right or easement of access, the precise route of which has been determined and designated as a freeway by an authorized agency of the State or a political subdivision thereof. The term shall include the main traveled portion of the traffic way, all lands situated within the right-of-way, and all ramps and appurtenant land and structures FRONT FOOT of a building (or parcel of land) shall mean the maximum width measured on a straight line parallel to the street. ILLEGAL SIGN shall be defined as all signs, except the following: a. Allowed by this Code and not requiring a permit. b Allowed by this Code with permit, and carrying a valid permit c. Not allowed by this Code, but which has been legalized by a variance and proper permit d. Allowed by this Code subject to a Use Permit or a Conditional Use Permit, providing the permit has been granted and a proper permit is in force. e. Any of the preceding, the permit for which has not been revoked by the terms of this Code. f A nonconforming sign as defined in this Code. INTERNAL LIGHTING shall mean a source of illumination entirely within the sign which makes the sign content visible at night by means of the light being transmitted through a translucent material, but wherein the source of the illumination is not visible. INTERNAL - INDIRECT LIGHTING shall mean a source of illumination entirely within the sign, generally a free standing letter, which makes the sign visible at night by means of lighting the background upon which the free standing character is mounted. The character itself shall be opaque and thus will be silhouetted against the background The source of illumination shall not be visible LOW PROFILE shall mean a sign not to exceed eight feet (8') in height as measured from the existing curb or sidewalk grade MAINTENANCE shall mean the replacing or repairing of a part or portion of a sign made unusable by ordinary wear, tear, or damage beyond the control of the owner. MARQUEE shall mean a permanent roof-like structure extending from part or all of the building face over a public right-of-way and constructed of some durable material, such as metal, glass, or plastic. NONCONFORMING SIGN shall mean any sign which is not currently allowed under this Code, but which when first constructed was legally allowed by the City or the political subdivision then having the control and regulation over construction of signs NONSTRUCTURAL TRIM shall mean the molding, battens, caps, nailing strips, latticing, cutouts, or letters and walkways which are attached to the sign structure ORDINANCE NO 292 PAGE 6 of 21 As\ Amok --a OFF-SITE SIGN (Billboard) shall mean a structure portraying information which directs attention to a business, commodity, service, enter- tainment, or product not related to the use existing on the premises upon which the sign is located ON-SITE SIGN shall mean a sign directing attention to a business, commodity, service, or entertainment conducted, sold, or offered upon the same premises as those upon which the sign is maintained. OUTDOOR-TYPE BUSINESS shall mean a business where all or most of the Amok business is conducted, or items displayed in an open area, and which are allowed under the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance PARAPET WALL shall mean a wall extending above the roof line of a building. PARCEL shall mean a parcel of land shown on a subdivision map, record of survey map, parcel map, or a parcel described by metes and bounds which constitutes a development site whether composed of a single unit of land or contiguous units under common ownership. PERMANENT SIGN shall mean any sign which is intended to be and is so constructed as to be of a lasting and enduring condition, remaining unchanged in character, condition (beyond normal wear), and position, provided the sign is listed as a permanent sign in the Ordinance. PORTABLE SIGN shall mean any sign not permanently affixed to the ground or a structure on the premises it occupies. PROJECTING SIGN shall mean any sign attached to a building or other structure and extending in whole or in part more than fifteen inches (15") from the wall or structure READER BOARD shall mean a business sign listing church services, stating religious activities, or those allowed by a directory sign. ROOF LINE shall mean the highest point of the main roof structure and not to include cupolas, pylons, projections, or minor raised portions of the roof. ROOF SIGN shall mean a sign erected upon or above a roof or parapet of a building or structure. SETBACK AREA shall mean the open space area defined in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Apache Junction under front, side, and rear „oink, yard setbacks. SHOPPING CENTER shall mean a commercial development whereupon there are located a number of separate commercial activities in which there are appurtenant shared facilities, such as parking and pedestrian walkways, and which is designed to provide a single area in which the public can obtain varied products and services. Distinguishing characteristics of a shopping center may, but need not include, common ownership of the real property upon which the center is located, commonwall con- struction, and multiple occupant commercial use of a single structure. SIDEWALK shall mean that portion of the public right-of-way between the property line and the established street curb whether paved or not. SIGN shall mean any device for visual communication that is used for the purpose of bringing the subject thereof to the attention of the public, but not including any flag, badge, or insignia of any government or governmental agency, and further not including any item of merchandise normally displayed within a show window of a merchant ORDINANCE NO 292 PAGE 7 of 21 Adook. "Pik The term "Sign" shall mean and include any display of any letter, numeral, figure, emblem, picture, outline, character, announcement, or anything in part or in combination by any means whereby the same are made visible to the eye and for the purpose of attracting attention outdoors to make anything known, whether such display be made on, attached to, or as a part of any other structure, surface, or thing including, but not limited to, the ground or any rock, tree, or other natural object, when display is visible beyond the boundaries of the lot or parcel of property on or over which the same is made. SIGN HEIGHT shall mean the vertical distance measured from the adjacent street grade or upper surface of the curb, whichever permits the greatest height, to the highest point of said sign SIGN STRUCTURE shall mean any structure which supports or is capable of supporting any sign as defined in this Code A sign structure may be a single pole and may or may not be an integral part of the building STRUCTURE shall mean that which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind or piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner TEMPORARY SIGN shall mean any sign, banner, pennant, valance, or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard, or other like material, with or without frames, intended to be displayed for a short period of time only U B.C. STANDARDS shall mean the standards as set forth in the current edition of the Uniform Building Code adopted for use by the City of Apache Junction. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE shall mean the current edition of the Uniform Building Code of the City of Apache Junction. UNIFORM SIGN CODE shall mean the most current edition, adopted for use by the City of Apache Junction, of the Uniform Sign Code published by the International Conference of Building Officials VEHICLE SIGN shall mean signs mounted upon, painted upon, or otherwise erected on a trailer, truck, automobile, or other vehicle so parked or placed so that the signs thereon are visible from a public street or right-of-way. WALL MOUNTED shall mean a sign mounted flat against, or painted on the wall of a building or structure with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the face of said wall. No wall mounted sign shall be /"*• located above the top plate or project more than fifteen inches (15") from the wall. WINDOW SIGN shall mean any sign affixed to the interior or exterior of a window, or any sign located inside a building within six feet (6') of the interior side of the window and displayed so as to attract the attention of persons outside the building. SECTIONS 21 12-.23 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 21.12 The location of signs shall be governed by the provisions of this Code and need not comply with yard requirements as established elsewhere in the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance, unless specified by this Code. Section 21 13 ORDINANCE NO 292 PAGE 8 of 21 Churches, civic organizations, and other institutions shall be permitted signs in accordance with the multiple-family residential district section of this Code. Section 21 14 If a sign is indirecly illuminated, the source of illumination shall not be visible beyond the lot boundary If a sign is directly illuminated, the source of illumination shall not be visible to any residential district adjacent to the lot or parcel on which said sign is located. Section 21 15 A comprehensive sign plan may be submitted by the developers of a proposed commercial development which will occupy the entire frontage of one or more block fronts, or by the developers of a proposed shopping center. Such a plan shall include the locations, size, height, color, lighting, and orientation of all proposed signs, in addition to any other information deemed necessary and may be submitted in conjunction with the required site plan for the development. If the comprehensive site plan is found to be acceptable, exceptions to the provisions of this Code may be granted if the sign areas and densities shown on the plan are in conformity with the intent of this Code, and if such exceptions result in an improved relationship between the various parts of the plan All comprehensive sign plans shall require Conditional Use Permits Section 21.16 A sign located on, under, attached to, or an integral part of an architectural projection shall conform to all the following regu- lations: a A sign attached to or which is an integral part of the face of an architectural projection may extend a maximum of four feet (4') above or below the face of said projection b A sign may be placed below and may be supported by an architectural projection of a building when such projection is designed to carry the additional weight of such signs. c Any sign attached to or located on an architectural projection shall not be located less than eight feet (8') above a walkway, surfaced area, or ground level below such signs. d. No sign may be erected on or attached to an architectural projection in such a manner as to constitute a hazard to firemen climbing a ladder placed against such architectural projection. e No sign shall occupy more than seventy-five percent (75%) of the fascia section or parapet wall on which it is erected. Section 21.17 All projecting signs must be double-faced Double-faced signs shall have a maximum of twenty-four inches (24") between faces. Section 21.18 For corner lots in the commercial and industrial zoning districts, LL the following requirements shall apply a. On corner lots, the maximum allowable number and square ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 9 of 21 footage of on-site signs is permitted for each street frontage Sign maximum allowances, however, are not transferable either in whole or in part from one street frontage to another. b. On buildings having more than one street frontage, the maximum allowable number and square footage of on-site signs are permitted for each building frontage or occupancy Said maximum allowance, however, is not transferable either in whole or in part from one building frontage to another nor from one occupancy to another occupancy c. When a sign is erected at the street intersection corner of a parcel, or at the intersection of a building front, and is situated at an angle so as to be visible from both streets or both frontages, said sign shall not exceed the maximum area allowed for the longest front footage of building occupancy or street frontage The area of such signs shall be deducted from the total area and number of signs permissable on said property Section 21.19 Area of Sign a The area of a sign is the entire area within a single contiguous perimeter composed of parallelograms, circles, ellipses, trapezoids, and triangles, or a combination of two (2) of the above or regular portions thereof per sign panel which enclose the extreme limits of the advertising message, announcement, declaration, demonstration, display, illustration, insignia, surface, or space of a similar nature, together with any frame of other material, color, or condition which forms an integral part of the display and is used to differentiate such sign from the wall or background against which it is placed; excluding the necessary supports or uprights on which such sign is placed. Where a sign has two or more faces, the area of all faces shall be included in determining the area of the sign, except that only one face of a double-faced sign shall be considered in determining the sign area, provided that both faces are parallel and the distance between faces does not exceed two feet (2') b. Further, where a sign consists only of individual letters, numerals, symbols, or other similar components and is painted on or attached flat against the wall of a building, and where such individual components are without intergrated background definition and are not within a circumscribed frame area, the total area of the sign shall be the sum of the areas of the squares or rectangles surrounding each individual sign component. c. Where statuary, either real or simulated, is used as a sign, the area of said sign shall be the sum of the areas of the three (3) vertical sides of the smallest polyhedron encompassing the figures that are most visible from the public right-of-way Said signs shall be low profile and are permitted in addition to allowable freestanding signs subject to the provisions of Section 21.23 of this Code Section 21.20 A detached sign may consist of more than one sign panel provided all such sign panels are attached to one common integrated sign structure. The total area of all such panels shall not exceed the ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 10 of 21 maximum allowable sign area specified for a detached sign on said parcel. Where a sign message consists of separate and individual letters, modules, or symbols, each portion of said sign shall not be considered as one sign panel . In such cases, a single continuous perimeter completely surrounding the sign message shall be used to determine its sign area Section 21.21 In the commercial and industrial zoning districts, no more than two (2) permanent signs may be painted or otherwise displayed from the surface of any window, showcase, or other similar facility. The area of such signs shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the area of the window on which displayed. The area of said signs shall be deducted from the total allowed sign area. Section 21 22 Roof signs shall be permitted in all commercial and industrial zoning districts as follows a. Signs shall be attached to the fascia of or located on the sloping portion of the roof of a structure, but may not extend more than four feet (4') above the lower edge of the fascia of said roof. b. Signs may be attached to the face of a parapet wall, but may not extend more than four feet (4') above the highest point of said wall. c. Height of roof signs other than the above shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the height of the building on which said sign is located. Height of said building and sign shall be measured at the roof line. f d All roof signs shall be installed in such a manner that there are no visible angle iron supports, guy wires, braces, or secondary supports. Sign supports shall appear to be an architectural or integral part of said roof sign Section 21.23 Statues. either real or simulated, used for advertising purposes may be permitted in commercial and industrial districts with a Conditional Use Permit. Said statues shall be low profile and the area of said statue shall be deducted from the total allowable sign area SECTIONS 21.24- 28 PERMITTED SIGNS BY ZONING DISTRICT Section 21 24 In Single-Family Residential Districts and Single-Family Residential Uses in other districts a. One (1) illuminated or unilluminated sign per house, not exceeding two (2) square feet in area, giving the name and address of the land or building on which displayed, or the owner or leasee thereof Said sign shall be wall mounted, on or under an architectural feature, or low profile. b. For permanent subdivision identification signs for recorded subdivisions, two (2) low profile signs with a maximum area of thirty-two (32) square feet per sign Section 21.25 ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 11 of 21 41,01Mr In Multiple-Family Residential Districts and Multiple-Family Residential Uses in other districts a. One (1) illuminated or unilluminated sign per dwelling not exceeding two (2) square feet in area, giving the name and address of the land or building on which dis 3.yed, or the owner or leasee thereof. Said sign shall be wall mounted, on or under an architectural feature, or low profile b Identification signs for apartments and condominium complexes as follows: 1) One (1) illuminated or unilluminated sign per lot or parcel not exceeding thirty-two (32) square feet in area giving the name, address, and use conducted on the property. 2) Said sign shall be wall mounted, on or under an architectural feature, or low profile If low profile, said sign may be double-faced. Section 21.26 In the Mobile Home Park/Recreational Vehicle Park/Recreational Vehicle Subdivision Districts: a. One (1) illuminated or unilluminated sign per dwelling, not exceeding two (2) square feet in area, giving the name and address of the land or building on which displayed, or the owner or leasee thereof. Said sign shall be wall mounted, or low profile. b. Two (2) illuminated or unilluminated signs per park or subdivision not exceeding thirty-two (32) square feet in ( area per sign giving the name, address, and use conducted on the property. Said sign shall be wall mounted, on or ( under an architectural feature, or low profile If low profile, said sign may be double-faced. Section 21.27 Commercial Districts Within the Commercial districts, signs indicating the business, commodities, service, or other activity sold, offered, or conducted on the premises are permitted as follows ,0011\ a One (1) detached sign for each developed lot or parcel, not exceeding one (1) square foot of sign for each lineal foot of street frontage abutting the developed portion of said parcel or lot, provided that: 1) Detached signs shall be low profile. 2) No detached sign shall exceed a total area of two hundred (200) square feet per sign face. b Two (2) attached signs for each occupancy. Signs shall not exceed two (2) square feet of sign area for each front foot of building occupancy. Said signs may be roof, wall, or window mounted, on or under an architectural projection No attached sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet in total area c Each occupancy shall be allowed at least thirty-two (32) square feet of total sign area. ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 12 of 21 Section 21.28 Industrial Districts: Signs indicating the business, commodities, service, or other activity sold, offered, or conducted on the premises are permitted as follows a One (1) detached sign for each developed lot or parcel, not exceeding one (1) square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of street frontage abutting the developed �1 portion of said parcel. 1) Detached signs shall be low profile 2) No detached sign erected in the Industrial District shall exceed a total area of two hundred (200) square feet per sign face. b. Two (2) attached signs for each occupancy Said signs shall not exceed three (3) square feet of total sign for each front foot of building occupancy. Said signs may be roof, wall, or window mounted, on or under an architectural projection SECTIONS 21.29- 33 TEMPORARY SIGNS Section 21.29 Real Estate Signs a. Nonilluminated signs not exceeding eight (8) square feet in area pertaining only to the lease, sale, or rental of the land or building upon which displayed are permitted in all zoning districts. Maximum height of such signs shall not exceed sixty inches (60") above grade. One such sign shall be permitted for each parcel or lot, except on corner lots, where two (2) signs per parcel shall be permitted, one (1) per street frontage. Said signs shall be removed within ten (10) days after lease, sale, or rental of the property has been accomplished b Where the property being advertised for lease, sale, or rental contains more than one (1), but less than ten (10) acres, one (1) nonilluminated sign not to exceed twelve (12) square feet in total area pertaining only to the lease, sale, or rental of said property is permitted If said parcel is a corner lot, two (2) such signs shall be allowed, one (1) per street frontage Maximum height of such signs shall not exceed eight feet (8') in height, nor shall said signs be erected within ten feet (10') of the public right-of-way. Said signs shall be removed within ten (10) days after lease, sale, or rental of the property has been accomplished. c. Where the property being advertised for lease, sale, or rental is zoned for commercial or industrial use and contains less than one (1) acre, one (1) nonilluminated sign not to exceed sixteen (16) square feet in total area pertaining only to the lease, sale, or rental of said property is permitted Where the property is zoned for commercial or industrial use and contains at least one (1) acre, but less than ten (10) acres, one (1) nonilluminated sign not to exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in total area pertaining only to the lease, sale, or rental of said property is permitted If said parcel is a corner lot, two (2) such signs shall be allowed, one (1) per street frontage. Maximum height of said signs shall not exceed eight feet (8') in height Said ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 13 of 21 signs exceeding sixteen (16) square feet in area shall not be erected within twenty feet (20') of the public right-of-way, and said signs not exceeding sixteen (16) square feet shall not be erected within ten feet (10') of the public right-of-way Said signs shall be removed within ten (10) days after lease, sale, or rental of the property has been accomplished. d. When the property being advertised for lease, sale, or rental contains ten (10) or more acres, one nonilluminated sign not to exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area pertaining only to the lease, sale, or rental of said property is permitted in all zoning districts If said parcel is a corner lot, two (2) such signs shall be allowed, one (1) per street frontage. Maximum height of said signs shall not exceed eight feet (8') above grade, with said sign not to be erected within twenty feet (20') of the public right-of-way. If the property for lease, sale, or rental has in excess of three hundred feet (300') of street frontage, one (1) additional sign may be erected for each additional three hundred feet (300') of street frontage in excess of the first three hundred feet (300'), with said signs to maintain a minimum spacing of three hundred feet (300'). Said signs shall be removed within ten (10) days after lease, sale, or rental of the property has been accomplished. e. Open house directional signs not to exceed eight (8) square feet in area are permitted in all zoning districts, provided they are nonilluminated and used only when a salesperson is on duty at the property for sale. Said signs may be double- faced and shall not be located in the public right-of-way or create a traffic hazard. A maximum of three (3) such signs are permitted for each home, or group of homes in a subdivision, for sale ( Section 21.30 Political and Campaign Signs Political and campaign signs on behalf of candidates for public office or measures on primary, general, or special election ballots are permitted in all zoning districts subject to the following regulations a Said signs shall not be erected earlier than sixty (60) days prior to the said election and shall be removed within ten (10) days following said election b. The persons, party, or parties responsible for the erection or distribution of any such signs shall be jointly and individually liable for their removal c In any residential district, only one (1) detached sign is permitted per lot or parcel. Said sign shall not exceed ten (10) square feet in area or six feet (6') in height. Further, said sign shall not be located within ten feet (10') of the public right-of-way. d. In any commercial or industrial district, one (1) or more detached signs are permitted per lot or parcel, providing that such signs do not in aggregate exceed fifty (50) square feet in total sign area. Said signs shall not exceed eight feet (8') in height or be erected within ten feet (10') of the public right-of-way. I' Section 21 31 Contractor and Subcontractor Signs ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 14 of 21 Amok 00""MIP Signs designating the contractor or subcontractor engaged in the construction or repair of the building or buildings on each lot or parcel of property shall be allowed in all zoning districts. a One (1) noniliuminated sign is allowed per contractor or subcontractor. Said sign shall not exceed eight (8) square feet in area and shall not exceed a height of forty-two inches (42"). b Said sign shall be removed within ten (10) days after the function of the contractor or subcontractor on the property is complete c. All contractor or subcontractor signs may be consolidated on one (1) sign The area of the consolidated sign is to be calculated at six (6) square feet per contractor or subcontractor listed with a maximum area of thirty-six (36) square feet for six (6) or more contractors listed. Said sign shall not exceed eight feet (8') in height or be located within ten feet (10') of the public right-of-way. d The above sign square footage areas may be increased to a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet of sign area for an individual contractor or subcontactor, and ninety-six (96) square feet of sign area for all contractors and subcontractors with a Conditional Use Permit Section 21.32 Development Signs Signs indicating or identifying a proposed future development shall be allowed in all zoning districts. a. One (1) single or double-faced detached sign is allowed per lot or parcel proposed for development, unless such parcel is a corner lot in which case two (2) such signs shall be allowed, one (1) per street frontage b. The face area of each such sign shall not exceed thirty-t:;o (32) square feet for the first acre or portion thereof. When the lot or parcel proposed for development exceeds one (1) acre in size, the combined area of the signs used may increase by five (5) square feet in area for each additional acre or portion thereof, up to a maximum of ninety-six (96) square feet per face. Amok c. Said signs shall not be erected within ten feet (10') of the public right-of-way or exceed a height of fifteen feet (15'). d. Said sign or signs shall be removed within ten (10) days after completion of the proposed development. Section 21.33 Subdivision Signs a Temporary subdivision signs may be located on the site of the subdivision in all zoning districts in accordance with the following schedule No of Lots in Plat No. Permitted Signs Per Site Less than 50 1 50 to 299 2 300 or more 3 b Said signs shall be removed within four (4) years, or after all lots in the subdivision are sold, whichever occurs first. ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 15 of 21 c Maximum height of said signs shall not exceed twenty feet (20') and no such sign shall be erected within ten feet (10') of the public right-of-way. d Subdivision signs shall be either single or double-faced and no subdivision sign shall exceed one hundred-sixty (160) square feet in area per sign face. SECTIONS 21.34-.35 OFF-SITE SIGNS (BILLBOARDS) /�� Section 21.34 1' In accordance with the policy of the City to preserve and enhance the character of the City, no off-site advertising structures shall be erected within the City limits, except as provided for in Section 21 35 Section 21 35 Off-site signs may be allowed by Conditional Use Permit by the Planning and Zoning Commission Such signs shall have the purpose of directing people to a central location or a limited number of locations where information about the products and services offered in the Apache Junction area may be obtained and displayed. Such information may be in the form of maps, brochures, menus, or similar materials obtainable at a Chamber of Commerce or Tourist Bureau location. SECTIONS 21 36-.37 NONCONFORMING SIGNS AND USES Section 21.36 Signs for Legal Nonconforming Uses Subject to the provisions of this Section, signs for a legal nonconforming use as described in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Apache Junction are permitted. Signs for a legal nonconforming use shall be deemed to comply with the provisions of this Code if they comply with the sign restrictions for the most restrictive zoning district which permits the nonconforming use as an allowed use. Such signs shall be permitted as long as the nonconforming use is permitted. Any such sign legally existing on the effective date of this Code, but which does not comply with the regulations of this Code shall be deemed a nonconforming sign under the provisions of this Code. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary herein, no new or additional signs for a nonconforming use shall be permitted after the effective date of this Code. Section 21 37 Signs Rendered Nonconforming a Any sign which becomes nonconforming subsequent to the effective date of this Code, either by reason of annexation to the City or amendment of this Code, the Zoning Ordinance, or other provisions of the City Code so as to render such sign nonconforming, shall be subject to the provisions of this Code. b A nonconforming sign structure shall not be reerected, relocated, or replaced unless it is brought in compliance with the requirements of this Code c. Reasonable repairs and alterations may be made to nonconforming signs. However, if any sign is hereafter damaged exceeding fifty percent (50%) of the reproduction value according to the appraisal thereof by competent appraisers, or is removed by any means whatsoever, including an Act of God, such sign may be restored, reconstructed, altered, or repaired only to conform with ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 16 of 21 OIS rs the provisions of this Code. d Whenever the name of a business changes, the signs on the premises shall be modified to bring them into conformance with these regulations even though the intended change is a change of sign copy only. This regulation shall not apply to directory signs designed with interchangable letters or panels. SECTIONS 21.38-.42 PERMITS Section 21 38 Permits Required A sign shall not hereafter be erected, re-erected, constructed, altered, or maintained, except as provided in this Code and after a permit for the same has been issued by the Building Official A separate permit shall be required for a sign or signs for each business entity, and a separate permit shall be required for each group of signs on a single supporting structure In addition, electrical permits shall be obtained for electric signs. Section 21 39 Application for Permit Application for a sign permit shall be made in writing upon forms furnished by the Building Official. Such application shall contain the location by street and number of the proposed sign structure, as well as the name and address of the owner and the sign contractor or erector. The Building Official may require the filing of plans or other pertinent information where, in his opinion, such information is necessary to insure compliance with this Code Standard plans may be filed with the Building Official. Section 21 40 Permit Issuance Term a. The Building Official shall issue a permit for the erection, alteration, or relocation of a sign within the City when an application therefore has been properly made and the sign complies with all appropriate laws and regulations of the City. b. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced within sixty (60) working days from the date of such permit, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days or more at any time after the work is commenced. Before such work can be commenced or resumed thereafter, a new permit shall first be obtained and the fee shall be one-half the amount required for a new permit for such work provided no changes have been made in the original plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one (1) year. c The Building Official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under the provisions of this Section whenever the permit is issued on the basis of a material omission or misstatement of fact, or in violation of any ordinance or 1 any provision of this Section. d. No permit for a sign issued by the City shall be deemed to constitute permission or authorization to maintain a public or private nuisance, nor shall any permit issued hereafter ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 17 of 21 constitute a defense in an action to abate a nuisance Section 21.41 Permit Fees Before issuing any sign permit required by the Code, a permit fee shall be paid in accordance with the schedule established by the City Council. Section 21 42 Sign Inspection All signs for which a permit is required shall be subject to ^. inspection by the Building Official SECTIONS 21.43-46 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Section 21 43 Authority for Conditional Use Permits a. When a Conditional Use Permit is required by this Code, said permit may be granted at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission A Conditional Use Permit is not the automatic right of any applicant. The Commission shall consider all the factors relating to the proposed sign and whether such sign will adversely affect public health, safety, and welfare. b A Conditional Use Permit for signs larger, higher, or greater in number than those allowed under this Code may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission if special circumstances warrant it. Section 21 44 Application for a Conditional Use Permit Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a sign shall be made on forms prescribed by the Commission and shall be acccompanied by statements, plans, and other related materials as may be deemed necessary to carry out the intent of this Section. Section 21.45 Fee for a Conditional Use Permit There shall be a filing fee for a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the schedule established by the City Counci, to be paid at the time the application is filed Section 21.46 Hearing on a Conditional Use Permit A Conditional Use Permit application shall be considered at a /.414, public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission may attach conditions to the granting of the Conditional Use Permit when in its judgement such conditions are necessary or desirable to accomplish the purposes of this Section. The Commission may prescribe any conditions it deems necessary in order to carry out the provisions and intent of this Code SECTIONS 21 47-.51 VARIANCES AND APPEALS Section 21.47 Variances When the strict application of the provisions of this Code would result in unnecessary hardship or would be inconsistent with the purpose of this Code, a variance from the provisions of this Code may be granted in accordance with the provisions of this Section Section 21 48 Board of Adjustment a The Board of Adjustment shall have jurisdiction of and is ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 18 of 21 hereby charged with responsibility for granting variances to the provisions of this Code. b The Board shall prescribe in connection with any variance such conditions as the Board may deem necessary in order to fully carry out the provisions and intent of this Sign Code. Violation of any such condition shall be a violation of the Code and such violation shall render the variance null and void. c. Variances as granted by the Board shall be void if the permit is not vested within sixty (60) days of such granting or within the time stipulated by the Board d. The Board shall have the authority to grant a variance from the provisions of this Code, provided there is sufficient evidence to show that: 1) There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land referred to in the application that do not prevail on other property in that zone, and 2) The authorizing of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right, and that the strict application of the regulations would work an unnecessary hardship, and 3) The authorizing of the application will not be materially detrimental to the persons residing or working in the vicinity of the property, to the neighborhood, or to the public welfare in general; and 4) That reasonable use of the property cannot be made without approval of the variance. e. The Board shall hear and decide all appeals that may be taken by any person, any officer, or department of the City when there is alleged error in any order, requirements, or decision made by an administrative official in the enforcement of the provisions of this Code Section 21 49 Use Variances Prohibited No "Use Variance" shall be granted. A "Use Variance" is one which would permit a particular type of sign to be located in a zone in which it otherwise is prohibited. Section 21.50 Appeals Procedure a. Appeals to the Board may be taken by any person aggrieved or by an officer, department, or board of the City affected by by any decision of any administrative official, within thirty (30) days, by filing a Notice of Appeal specifying the grounds thereof with the Planning Department b. The appeal stays all proceedings in the matter unless the Zoning Administrator certifies to the Board that by reason of the facts stated in the certificate, a stay would cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case, proceedings shall not be stayed, except by a restraining order granted by the Board or Court of Record on application and notice to the Planning Department. c. The Board shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal and give notice thereof to the parties in interest ORDINANCE NO 292 PAGE 19 of 21 .•�. rn!' and the public Section 21.51 .' rlcation Applications for appeals and interpretations or variance shall be made in the Office of the Department of Planning on a form provided therefore Upon the filing of an application for a variance or an interpretation; except one requested by an official of the City, the applicant shall pay a filing fee in accordance with the schedule established by the City Council . No part of any such fee shall be returnable after an application is filed and such fee is paid. /""• SECTION 21.52 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS All signs and sign structures shall be constructed to the standards and specifications as set forth in the Uniform Sign Code. SECTIONS 21.53- 55 SIGN MAINTENANCE Section 21 53 Maintenance and Repair Each sign shall be maintained in a safe, presentable, and good condition, including replacement of defective parts, repainting, cleaning, and other acts required for the maintenance of said sign. The Building Official shall require compliance or removal of any sign determined by said Official to be in violation of this Section of the Code Section 21.54 Abandoned Signs Any sign which is located on property which becomes vacant and unoccupied for a period of three (3) months or more, or any sign which was erected for an occupant or business unrelated to the present occupant or his business, or a sign which pertains to a time, event, or purpose which no longer applies, shall be deemed to have been aban- doned. Permanent signs applicable to a business temporarily suspended because of a change of ownership or management of such business shall not be deemed abandoned unless the property remains vacant for a period of six (6) months or more. An abandoned sign is prohibited and shall be promptly removed by the owner of the sign or the owner of the premises. Off-site sign structures shall be deemed as abandoned if left vacant and unoccupied for a period of three (3) months or more. Section 21 55 Dangerous or Defective Signs No person shall maintain or permit to be maintained on any t1 premises owned or controlled by him any sign which is in a dangerous or defective condition. Any such sign shall be promptly removed or repaired by the owner of the sign or the owner of the premises SECTION 21.56-.60 ENFORCEMENT Section 21.56 The City Building Official is charged with enforcement of this Code Section 21.57 The Building Official may appoint such subordinate officials and assistants necessary to the enforcement of this Code. Section 21.58 ORDINANCE NO 292 PAGE 20 of 21 P3 The Building Official, or his authorized representative, shall have the authority to enter any building, structure, or premises or any part thereof, at any reasonable time for the purpose of performing his official duties under this Code. Section 21 59 It shall be and is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person to willingly interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the Building Official, or his authorized representative, in the enforcement of the provisions of this Code. Section 21 60 It shall be the duty of the Department of Public Safety of the City of Apache Junction to assist the Building Official, or his authorized representative, in the enforcement of the provisions of this Code." SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health, and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 . Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F Alexander City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 292 PAGE 21 of 21 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 4,, iv-- n' ITEM # CI MEETING OF 6//i � MOTION BY: SECONDED BY; YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO 1 k/ COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL 111.111111111111111111 COUNC I Lr1AN TAYLOR VICE fAYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANI1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0/(1 ) (// ‘a' ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY :Y6/�� ABSTAINED E MAYOR i s► NCILMAN_BALJO 0 NC I LMRN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN . LCOUNCILMAN SHANKS Gil MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 9 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 292, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 292, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 292, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING "THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE," BY AMENDING "ARTICLE 21"; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL (With the Emergency Clause) Amok •M ITEM NO. 9 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 292, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 292, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 292, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING "THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE," BY AMENDING "ARTICLE 21"; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL (With the Emergency Clause) PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 342, PZ-69-84 , THE APPLICANT IS JONES AND BURGESS 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING Omik COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED ACHE 4O �Q 3 ti0 ;. O q �zR ONE ` 'pity o -padre cunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 27, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY , CITY MANAGER Approver for Agenda ,ate item # FROM: , ► HUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING First Reading //Lc/l . /C L Second Reading SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 ✓Public Hearing PZ-69-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 342) Old Business New Business Consent Agenda Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-69-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 342, is a request by the applicants Robert and Barbara Jones and Jerry Burgess to rezone their property from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone. The site is a vacant 2.5 acre parcel located on the south side of 12th Avenue between the Solana and Acacia Road alignments in Section 27. It is designated Medium/High Density Residential Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes, a house, and vacant land. Planning Department Comments and Recommendations Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Staff also recommends stipulating that this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. By ordinance, intersecting streets must have 20 foot by 20 foot cutoffs. Stipulations in Ordinance Staff and Commission both recommend roadway dedications and that the parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE1602) 982-8002 Honorable Mayor and City Council Agenda Item - April 16, 1985 PZ-69-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 342) Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of March 26, 1985, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (f1/S Tepolt/Hoaglin 4-3-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-69-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 342, application of Robert and Barbara Jones and Jerry Burgess for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. The applicants dedicate the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. This parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. It is in compliance with the General Plan. 2. It appears to be the highest use of the land at this time." CRN:mas PZ-69-84 ORDINANCE NO, 342 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TN TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE F. 11TR AVFIUE 11 �a E. 12TrEI H , . r/7 -., : „;! ,,s M M i 4 // E. 13TH AVE. o a 0 Q o :., SIX g U Q F-- lJ N N y N E. 14TH AVE.E. cif 4. \.E. i5rH AVF. SF r SIN(.t2 FAM1ty SUBJECT SITE MN ` MO81tC HOME N SCALE: 0 40 400 i _ L_1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) 41P0 /1 3 ORDINANCE NO 342 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-69-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ( ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcel of land described as The Northwest of the Northeast 4 of the Southwest a of the Northeast 4 of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone; subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicants dedicate the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM av F Alexa r City Attorney PZ-69-84 CRDINANCE NO, 342 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE "a\ ►UE E, 12TH AVE. Q A E. 13TH AVE. Q ¢ Q = o o ¢ O U cc O Q ¢ IV U W W U ¢ F- c-, ¢ J CG Q U CD CD h- ¢ Cn U Cf) V) N N "Mk, E. 14TH AVE. E. 15TH AVE. A SUBJECT SITE N SCALE. d .i i . 1 200 400 r- 1_ J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) g 11110 OIN CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1 I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification. Parcel No. 1 From GR To TH Parcel No. 2 Parcel No. 3 Parcel No 4 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)? medium to high density opportunity 3 Size of the subject property 1 1/4 acres ILaar41s1 uare `eet] 4 How is the property currently developed? undl�e '" d," t g5 5 What are the adjacent land uses' NNE N� North. mobile homes and vacant land �OOSv OPME South A frame P`!a East. mobile homes and vacant land West mobile homes and vacant land 6. The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned S 1/2 of the NW 1/4, NE 1/4, SW 1/4, NE 1/4 Section 27 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7. Why are you requesting this rezoning' to rezone property to its highest and best use I — II, (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No. f"L �G C- Proposed Ordinance No Date Filed o��d/e Application received by Receipt No ,t) d V 0 7 Fee Amount - �.5 D - 0-1"� Page 1 of 2 4/18/84 8. I/We hereby certify that a (I am)(We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership b. I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning c. I/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com- mission and the City Council, and action to approve or disapprove our request is discretionary d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes e I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed named below as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction (1) Jerry E. Burgess (print owner's name) (uign re C/ P O. Box 305 (address) Apache Junction, AZ 85220 982-7012 (phone) (2) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) (phone) (3) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) (phone) STATE OF ARIZONA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF � 1 G SS before me this 544. day of Feb , 19 85 , 1 by. ✓ NOTARY: .. a My Comm Eipiree Poi ^9 19°5 :'=' �..� i+•-l/I (My commission @fopitsS'"e"........,.,< ��►� tary Public 9. 1 hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owners in this rezoning application as their representative and that they have requested that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me (print representative's name) (signature) (mailing address) (phone) STATE OF SS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF ) before me this day of , 19�, by (My commission expires ) Notary Public Page 2 of 2 Anik Amok CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification Parcel No 1 From GR To TH Parcel No 2 Parcel No 3 Parcel No. 4 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)? medium to high density opportunity 3 Size of the subject property 1 1/4 acres [acres] [square feet] 4 How is the property currently developed? undeveloped 5 What are the adjacent land uses' North mobile homes and vacant land N1c5) South A frame mobile homes and vacant land �/� �c East: West. mobile homes and vacant land c<c5) a �� P OQ 6 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned �QS O�J�� N 1/2 of the NW 1/4, NE 1/4, SW 1/4, NE 1/4 Or1O Section 27 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7. Why are you requesting this rezoning? To rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No. Z� (0 5 — Proposed Ordinance No 3 5/o2 _ Date Filed �S Application received by /94 Receipt No 6;1 D 7 Fee Amount t,23 O 06 Page 1 of 2 n/18/84 frof elk ?PS • 8. I/We hereby certify that a. (I am)(We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning c I/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com- ^ mission and the City Council, and action to approve or disapprove our request is discretionary. d I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes. e I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed Jerry E. Burgess named below as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction (1) Robert W. Jones III(print owner's name) s natu e 7007 E. Apache Trail (address) Mesa, AZ 85207 832-2000 (phone) (2) Barbara B Jones (print owner's name) signatur 7007 E. Apache Trail C-a O A- (address) Mesa, Arizona 85207 832-2000 (phone) (3) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) (phone) egs STATE OF ARIZONA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF Maricopa SS before me this S`u day of Feb. , 19 85 , by' Robert W Jones III and Barbara B. Joaec�,,,d�w�tu+� u-•c <,� (My commission expires 7-5-SS ) Notary Public 9 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owners in this rezoning application as their representative and that they have r quested that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me Jerry E Burgess (print representative's name) / / 0 ture) P. 0. Box 305 982_7012 (mailing address) (phone) Apache Junction, AZ 85220 STATE OFT ARIZONA )) SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF /ILt'ih.c_ro-y.n. ) before me , is .rk_day of Feb 19 85 by. Jerry E. Burgess \�h ry Public (My commission aspires,_, J V n:)C..,r.:n a>.pute O. ,L3 liS is P Z Of 2 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES �, Il. • � 1 . ►,. ITEM # (° MEETING OF (� MOTION BY : nr\i\ e SECONDED BY ; YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS , COUNCILMAN RAI in /ICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ✓ COUNCILMAN III L .MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ^ 1 ID ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : acrti SECONDED BY : 1 6 t YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HILL COhiNC'LEAN_ TAYLOR .COUNCILMAN _SHANKS I 1ICF MAYOR EIDSON V f _COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Adm. ITEM NO. 10 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 342, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 342, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 342, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING �-� ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-69-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO. 10 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 342, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 342, BY TITLE ONLY. S �N 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 342, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-69-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 343, PZ-70-84 THE APPLICANT IS JONES, BURGESS, PUCKETT, SITEK, AND SALIDO , /11111. 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION. 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 . IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN' S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED ' ` '�u3 o • , pacnne u71,Ctzon '/ZOO ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 10, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY , CITY MANAGER FROM. i<�J JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER di SUBJEC . AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 PZ-70-8tOPROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 343) Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-70-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 343, is a request by the applicants Robert and Barbara Jones, Jerry Burgess, Don and Bonnie Puckett, Michelle Sitek, and Susan Salido to rezone their property from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone. The site is a vacant 5 acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Royal Palm Road and 4th Avenue in Section 21. It is designated Medium/High Density Residential Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes, houses, and vacant land. Background The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this case ,...,-- on March 26 , 1985, at which time the case was continued until April 23, 1985, to allow time for a work session to discuss minimum TH lot sizes and requirements. It was determined that the April 23rd date would put this case over the 90-day time limit for forwarding to the City Council , and the City Atorney determined that it would not be in violation of the Open Meeting Law or of any State or City ordinance to hear this case if the Commission agreed to consider it by a 2/3 ' s vote on April 9th. The City Attorney advised the Commission to abide by the standards set in the Zoning Ordinance when recommending stipulations. Approver for Agenda ` -L , Date Item # / First Reading idr.',u, // _ S-.cond Reading Public Hearing _.__ old Business New Business - Consent Agenda 1CO1 ':ORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 35220 TELEPHONEi602) 982 8002 � P�QACNf✓G 'j' O n� q,pizONP • ity c ` pache unciian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 10, 1985 Aar MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: , MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: 0JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ..--�� SUBJEC . AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 PZ-70-85 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 343) Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-70-84, Proposed Ordinance No. 343, is a request by the applicants Robert and Barbara Jones, Jerry Burgess, Don and Bonnie Puckett, Michelle Sitek, and Susan Salido to rezone their property from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone. The site is a vacant 5 acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Royal Palm Road and 4th Avenue in Section 21. It is designated Medium/High Density Residential Opportunity on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes , houses, and vacant land. Background The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this case on March 26, 1985, at which time the case was continued until April 23, 1985, to allow time for a work session to discuss minimum TH lot sizes and requirements. It was determined that the April 23rd date would put this case over the 90-day time limit for forwarding to the City Council , and the City Atorney determined that it would not be in violation of the Open Meeting Law or of any State or City ordinance to hear this case if the Commission agreed to consider it by a 2/3's vote on April 9th. The City Attorney advised the Commission to abide by the standards set in the Zoning Ordinance when recommending stipulations. Approver for Agenda pate Item # First Reading CJ//;�a"5- _ 1/ S,cond Reading Public Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE1602) 982 8002 PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 343, PZ-70-84 THE APPLICANT IS JONES, BURGESS, PUCKETT, SITEK, AND SALIDO , 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN' S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED /\ .emu The Honorable Mayor and City Council Agenda Item - April 16, 1985 PZ-70-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 343) Page Two of Three A protest petition had been filed against this rezoning by Aline Caughey on March 26 , 1985, but was rescinded on April 5, 1985. Planning Department Comments and Recommendations Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium/High Density Opportunity General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the north and south thirty-three feet (33' ) and the west forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Staff also recommends stipulating that this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. By Ordinance, intersecting streets must have twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs. Part of the easement to the east has been abandoned, but Public Works is studying dedication requirements for Hopi Road. Stipulations in Ordinance Staff recommended roadway dedications and that this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. Since this rezoning request was recommended for denial by the Commission, no stipulations were made. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of April 9, 1985, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Vehon/ Jorgensen 4-2-1, with Mr. Heermans and Mr. Tepolt dissenting. Mr. Taylor vacated his seat due to a conflict of interest. ) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-70-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 343, application of Robert and Barbara Jones, Jerry Burgess, Don and Bonnie Puckett, Michelle Sitek, and Susan Salido for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone , that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application. The reasons for this recommendation are 1. It appears it is the intention of the applicant to subdivide this property without the benefit of going through the City' s Subdivision Regulations. 2. The applicant has not adequately shown the need to grant a rezoning which allows zoning to this density on this 5 acre parcel . Honorable Mayor and City Council Agenda Item - April 16, 1985 PZ-70-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 343) Page Three of Three 3. Until a change can be made in the Ordinance to enlarge the minimum lot size, it is felt that the rezoning would not be consistent with a majority of the surrounding property uses at this time. " JAN:mas ^ (1-;sp.cil 11' O� U Z 'IP/ZOO' City an Apache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 11, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MIKE McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: ; JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 PZ-70-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 343) The Public Works Department has reviewed this case for roadway dedications, and offers the following options: Alternative #1 Should Hopi Road not be abandoned, provisions should be made for a cul-de-sac at the northerly end of Hopi Road. The major portion of the section, due to previous dedications , will be on the property requesting rezoning. In addition, the westerly half of Hopi Road (25 ' ROW) would need to be dedicated from the cul-de-sac to 4th Avenue, with provisions for a 20'x 20' cutoff. In addition, a 33' dedication should be provided for 4th Avenue; a 40' dedication on Royal Palm Boulevard and a 25 ' dedication on 2nd Avenue with provisions for 20'x 20' cutoffs at all intersections. Alternative #2 Should Hopi Road be abandoned, the following dedications should be required: 33' on 4th Avenue; 40' on Royal Palm; 25' on 2nd Avenue , including 20'x 20' cutoffs at all intersections. JAN:jl att: Cul-de-sac Sketch xc: Mr. Burgess Public Works Department File 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 g ^, Iti � aIj 7.0 � v . 4a . ) O_ r N N ul,Pr \ \ \--"&"c. , <11 \ \ ' ', \ N N , ' NN i • ) ) PZ-70-84 ORDINANCE NO, 343 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE 4001., FEA4T jorTtnN 3T, E, 2ND AVE, /// r—______ 1 TH 0 cc u cc 0 a cnal A I < cc E. 4TH AVE. 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 E. 5TH AVE. 1 "oak, 1 1 1 I i I CB-2 I GCB-2: o I TH 1 1 i___ 1 J r------�I 1 \ 1 a 11 1 I I I I 1 0 CB-2 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 _J N 1j1E SUBJECT SITE 1 i LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) L_ SCALE 1 0 300 p CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1 I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification: Parcel No 1 From: GR To TH Parcel No. 2 66N Parcel No. 3 Ao\ Parcel No. 4JPN �tGj� 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)? of p�GQ\� medium to high density OFPpO�� N 3 Size of the subject property 1 1/4 acres [acres] [square feet] 4 How is the property currently developed? undeveloped 5 What are the adjacent land uses' North mobile homes South bare land East bare land West' bare land 6 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned S 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the W 1/2, SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SE 1/4 Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7 Why are you requesting this rezoning? to rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No Z — 7 O - Proposed Ordinance No --3 Date Filed a/jf Application received by --`A Receipt No [� Fee Amount �SSO 0 0 Page 1 of 2 4/18/84 PZ-70-84 ORDINANCE NO, 343 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE /.I\ EAST JUV(TTQN ST, E. 2ND AVE. //// __ i I T-I a 0 w Ir a a co .///.//: 10 E. 4TH AVE. I E. 5TH AVE. I --------1 1---- I I 1 I I I CB-2 0-2o TH I I fx 1 1 -- 1 1- __Iill .z,r.. r- �I \ 1I IIII I 0 CB-2 1 I I N I I I I I I I I i ---- i N SUBJECT SITE L_� LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) SCALE• 0 300 A� CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification. Parcel No 1 From GR To TH Parcel No 2 \� Parcel No. 3 `T 065 ,11111* Parcel No 4 �� 0'5 NNE\4"C 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)? _ OF p\-QQM� medium to high density FPv©�J� N 3 Size of the subject property 1 1/4 acres [acres] [square feet] 4. How is the property currently developed' undeveloped 5 What are the adjacent land uses North: mobile homes South bare land East bare land West bare land 6 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned 5 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the W 1/2, SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SE 1/4 Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7 Why are you requesting this rezoning? to rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No — 7 0 — Proposed Ordinance No 3 Date Filed a�j/�(s� Application received by .J� /Z Receipt No 24/O dr _^ Fee Amount '2,S0 Page 1 of 2 4/18/84 AMIn PZ-70-84 ORDINANCE NO. 343 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TN TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE JUvrTtnm cT s 2 �� )16 YE. ' i S c .....K ce La o ,VA(' Sin t.,,?c °k� '1IJ m E. 4TH AVE. 1 , E. 5TH AVE. 1 1 I 1 1 1 CB-2 LB-2 o TH I 1 111111111g <I I a I -11 < I 0 1 CB-2 .1 I N 1 I 1 I I 1 I N I 1 VAC=Vacant SFD=Single-Family Dwelling N MH=Mobile Home 111 SUBJECT SITE MHP=Mobile Home Park hI -J LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) SCALE: I 1 0 300 /� �3 ORDINANCE N+Q 343 4 AN DRDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APAC, JUNCTION, ARIZ0 A, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE Ze ING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ' 'NGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-70-84 'OM GR GENERAL RURAL TI TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLI ING PROVISIONS, AND PROVID NG FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAIN 4 BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF T ' CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GE RAL The zoning district c .ssification on the oning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for he parcel of la , described as The West } of the South—st of e Northwest 1 of the Southeast $ of Section 2 Towns ip 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base a • M: idian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby-is amended fro GR G- eral Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone, subject to the following st •ulation • 1) the applicants dedicate the north and south thirty-three fee' (33') and e west forty feet (40') of the subject property for public roadwy and associat-. purposes, and 2) this parcel not be developed into a mob e home or retreat •nal vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. SECTION II REPEAL .G ANY CONFLICTING PROVISION All ordinances a . parts of ordinances in conflict wi. the provisions of this Ordinance • any part of the code adopted herein b• reference are hereby repeale• SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any s- tion, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinan - or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason eld to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of co .etent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the emaining portions thereof PA'SED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, A' ZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: avi . lexa City Attorney Ask // ORDINANCE NO. 343 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-70-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apacne Junction, Arizona, for the parcel of land described as: The West 2 of the Southwest 4 of the Northwest ; of the Southeast ; of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone; subject to the following stipulations. 1) the applicants dedicate the north twenty five feet (25' ) , the south thirty-three feet (33' ) , the west forty feet (40' ) , and the east twenty-five feet (25' ) of the subject site adjacent to the existing right-of-way for Hopi Road and to include a fifty foot (50' ) radius cul-de-sac and provisions for twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs at all intersections; and 2) this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are ,.4 hereby repealed. ' SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 . Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly &Om* City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F. Alexander City Attorney illwr Almik Ask PZ-70-84 ORDINANCE NO. 343 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE /1111/4 FAST JUvrTtnri SI, E. 2ND AVE, % T-I A a 0 u A aal 0 cc E. 4TH AVE. r 7 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 E. 5TH AVE. 1 1 --------� ---- I 1 /m\ I I I 1 I 1 I I CB-2 kB-2 01 ix : TH I 1 1 I a I I I a I I I 2 CB-2 1 1 N I 1 1 [ N __J :E. SUBJECT SITE LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) 0 300 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1 I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification Parcel No. 1 From: GR To TH %105) Parcel No. 2 *-� t Parcel No 3 "~ Parcel No. 4 �\J��aN�� 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)., c - Pti medium to high density O OO c" 3 Size of the subject property 1 1/4 acres [acres] [square feet] 4 How is the property currently developed? undeveloped 5 What are the adjacent land uses? North mobile homes South bare land East bare land West• bare land 6. The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the W 1/2, SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SE 1/4 Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7 Why are you requesting this rezoning? to rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No r - 7 0 - K Proposed Ordinance No -3 Oate Filed ?/[/�5� Application received by —T7 /2, _ Receipt No 70 y0 Fee Amount Page 1 of 2 4/18/84 014 8 I/We hereby certify that a (I am)(We are) the owners of the property described in this application. for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership b I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning c I/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com- mission and the City Council , and action to approve or disapprove our request is discretionary d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes e I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed Jerry E Burgess named below as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction (1) Robert W Jones III (print owner's name) (• ature) 7007 E Apache Trail (address) Mesa, Arizona 85207 832-2000 [phone) (2) Barbara B Jones g� (print owner's name) signat 7007 E Apache Trail ( e'11) (address) Mesa, Arizona 85207 332-2000 (phone) (3) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) (phone) STATE OF ARIZONA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF Maricopa SS before me this 40` day of Feb , ig 85 vir by Robert W. Jones antl--Barbara B. Jones ,��-��cam- iC ra w,c a..A, a tt✓ -�-- R (My commission expires 7-6-- Yid ) Notary Public 9. I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owners in this rezoning application as their representative and that they have re uested that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me Jerry E Burgess � �2- "cry (print representative's name) ,Ysignfiture) P 0 Box 305 / 982-7012 (mailing address) (phone) Anache Junction, AZ 85220 STATE OF ARIZONA ss The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF!'1C/i4.c ) before Re-this Jday of Feb , 1985 , by Jerry E. Bi .gels t^-,^ n- Tr ) Notar ublic (Fly commission expires. di i 30;) .< -_A. ,Page 2 of 2 CITY (1t APACS?i JU-tf Ar I7ONA P(7O'IINGAr'Iit TIOI 1 I/We hereby request a change of ,.nnrnn l sslfiration Parcel No 1 From r,a To TH Parcel No 2 _ Parcel No 3 Parcel No 4ati 0 7 What is the General Plan d, . ,Warren for the site(s)7 $1QSc medium to high density 3 Size of the subject prnpr. r. 1 1/4 acres [ $tEmpRe`f et] a How is the property rurrrrtl, ,rr ,rintrd' undeveloped What are the adjacent land n North. mobile homy!, South bare land - East bare land West' bare land 6 The legal description of thr property proposed to be rezoned N 1/2 of the E 1/2 of the 14 1/2, SW 1/4, NW 1/4, SE 1/4 Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range A Cast, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7 Why are you requesting this rezoning'? to rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Revcrre Side of Form) tOR OFFICE nf ONIY Case No. PZ - 70 Pr ep i nd Ordinance No 3l`// 2 Date Filed ' 1 Arpl irition received by �� /L Receipt No n_540 Fr( Ar•nunt _ -,I�- Q )9(.23-O.0a r' 1 or /'°IA4 R I/We hereby certify that a (I am)(We are) the owners of the property desrrtbed in this application for rezoning and have attarhrl copies of deed-, title reports, or other documents as proof of owner•,hin b. I/We have truthfully completed this annlrcatron for rezoning c. I/We understand the filing fee; to he non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public heal inn' before the Planning and Zonirg Com- mission end the City Council , and art inn to approve or disapprove our request is discretionary d I/We understand in order to , rt 'rn ap,u n it of this rezone :re may be requested to dedicate portl,,n,, of our pr"ipert, cor public roacl,oay and associated purposes c I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed named below as our representative in this ir,onin'J a;,pl ,ration and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever nerescary to hive the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Aprrhe Junction (lY Jerry E Burgess C (print owner's name) - - titre, P. 0 Box 305 (address) - - - Apache Junction, AZ 85220 982-7012 --- -- --- - (phone)`- ,L) (print owner's name) (signature, (address) -- -- (phone) (') (print owner's name) signature (address) - - ------- (phone) STATE OF ARIZONA ) The forel,oing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF))( G' 'lA 5.:, ' before-1 this j4(, day of Feb, , 19 85 ) t•.e•>�...•. by Jerry E Bis I • ngesrty-., �f'• 'TS !, P MY Ccmm Expires Nov 25 1385 (f'v commission expirtssx�J'�� "��" ` icy Public 9 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owners in this rezoning application as their representative and that they have requested that all correspondence in this matter he mailed to me (print representative's nameT — (signature) (mailing address) (phone) STATE OF ) SS The foregoing instrument was lckno,aledged r3u ITY OF ) before me this day of _ 11___ ti • lit — i", re—fission expires r 2 n; r11r OrIS CITY 40 n,uc )T1CTION A0170'IA ,•1 'n I 1PPI ICATM:. I/We hereby request a rhtmi, of zoning cItsstifiration Parcel No 1 From c,R Tn TH Parcel No 2 v Parcel No 3 - _ eaN Parcel No. 4 J 2 What is the General Plan destgnation for the s;te(s)? medium to high density 3 Size of the subject property - [acres] [square cr.nt1 4 How is the property currently developed' undeveloped 5 What are the adjacent land uses' GG�� VNorth mobile homes South: bare land 056 ;OQrcti� East bare land �Q� O ��V West bare land O�y0 --- - q, 6 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned S �3� Cv z. L) //2_ Sco `� Section r?( , Township I 'Irn th, Range R fast, Gila and Salt River Base Inc' Meridian, Apache Junction, P,nal County, Arizora 7 Why are you requesting t.hi, r"zoning' 0.44 To rezone property to its highest and best use (Plea-a, Cor,r lrtr Revrrsr, Stdt of Form) Top OFFICE US!' ONLY Case No - -/a S __._ Proposed Ordinance No -�yi / Date Filed .? Application received by Receipt No ci Fee Amount 00 P I/We hereby certify that a. (I am)(We are) the owners of the pronrr ,.y described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership b. I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning c. I/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning ^ process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com- mission and the City Council, and action to approve or disapprove our request is discretionary d I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our pronerti for public rcadway and associated purposes e. i/We being the own rs of the pro j rty in this rezoning application have appointed f1 j7.c� k. /ire.: ,t C' �i•S named below as our representative in t►'is rezoning application and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever nrcesrary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction (1) i- D0 N 1:w g-, (print owner's name) signature) /O t> L (address) (phone rcrre G pp 34i.1,�--r-_,I �nrN,F l� (print owner's name) signatures Lazs C G -- (address) (phone) (3) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) /; _-_ - (phone) STAT: OF (fir--i- , - -p-, ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COU'tTY OF Q,..-JZ_ S'c before me this 3 day o .� 19 kSr', by My Concussion awes Muy2;,1 �T "otory Public _^ (My commission expires. ) 9 1 hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owners in this rezoning application as their representative and that they have requestd that all a rrespondenc�. n this matter be mailed to me print re res ntta✓�tive's named s'q atu 970 // �I(ciAlir-& ,' (mailinp a die ) phone /f/°,:..,e iC< h *Z P�2 z `' - 9nD7-7c/Z STATE OF C�---3,-- - S5 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF �� e-e_. ) before me this S day of �� , 19�), by —�--- - ,�Q,.sue -1,SLA wc-�� My Gb•nmissitirs E;Y:r on}brr 1f,,IV n r 10,1 t c --- ('4i remission expires 1 ^r..m 9 of ' sMs CITY (U APACHIE JUtlCT1nN, ARI70NA RC7ONING APPI ICATION 1 I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification Parcel No. 1 From GR _ To Tx Parcel No. 2 Parcel No 3 1---_--'_. - -Parcel No. 4 �--^ 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)7 medium to high density 3 Size of the subject property [acres] [square `^-t' 4 How is the property currently developed? undeveloped 5 What are the adjacent land a rs/ North• mobile homes South bare land East: bare land West. bare land 6 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned xrns-k5,:) • /..?p 4-,Lt er( c.)CCJX/ j Section ?f , Township 1 Nn, th, Panne A Cast Gila and Salt River 8asC Ind Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7 Why are you requesting this 'Pinning' _ To rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) ^� FOR OFFICE USF ONLY Case No. T i '7 b- `/ Proposed Ordinance No 3/3 Date Filed a/F JFS�_ A Application received by Zt /0 Receipt No. 0ledc Fee A^,nunt ! a?aa oa 01144 P I/We hereby certify that a (I am)(We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership b I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning c. 1/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com- mission and the City Council , and action to approve or disa'prove our request is discretionary d I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our prnperti for public rridway and associated purposes e I/We being the ow ers of e property in this cnzoning application have appointed /�/yy zc/'�i 3S named below as our representative in/this pezoning ipnl .cation and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever necessary to hive the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction ift,....ic.,..44 4:C.,4 (print owner's name) (signature. - (address/-s5*' _ (phone) (print owner's name) (signature) , 9 - (address) e -- - - r ! — - (pho l o. AQ c-\ (3) _ pF • •\,O -(print owner's name) (signature)v.e-0� (address) ,— (phone) -- ST,.TZ OF ) The f01e ping instrument was acknowledged CCi,'T t OF } Si; ) before see this 5� 7-day of a.Z , 19 f h‘ .-',:''' , --/L,U, L l(t (tiv commission expires / -- //- ;,-Pd2 ) rintiry Public 9. I hereby certify that I have he, , appointed by the property cwners in this rezoning application as their representative and that they have le 'ie ed that all co respondence i this matter be mailed to me/ l rint /repress to3;ive's nine) zr s' a,t e 97o A/ AV,Ie<-,fc---- ji (mailing.addres ) (phone b/c-'(n_A-r ifl 'S-2 2 d _ qq.•,?- 7C/Z STATE OF 44-2, ) SS The foregoing instrument wac acknowledged v COUNTY OF r ---,,.,-.,�+ ) before me this 5 day of .. , 194 — b y ,3�v';1 L am = - --- J�-- —/ - 'jot," . ,I�lii!. ('�y r'sission expires _1-_. (1- id' , C -- n' 2 ar es, op4 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification Parcel No 1 From GR To ?H Parcel No. 2 Parcel No. 3 _ ^` Parcel No 4 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)7 Ngar3 medium to high density FFp 3 3 Size of the subject property [as.ftwi Volveleet] 4. How is the property currently developed? undevelopee°' 5 What are the adjacent land uses') North mobile homes South bare land East bare land West. bare land 6 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned '7/ / /1 5 K ` V3�� :t cr' v Section a/ , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7 Why are you requesting this rezoning? To rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No. 2.— 6 - Proposed Ordinance No K3 Date Filed 102 �r Application received by Sp, Receipt No 1�0 0 ' Fee Amount 7,--1`o2J d 4-2 Page l of 2 4/18/B4 f>rs 8 I/We hereby certify that a. (I am)(We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership b I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning c I/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com- mission and the City Council, and action to approve or disapprove our e request is discretionary d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes e I/We being the owiners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed /_,v 6. �t ,26 a'SS named below as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction (1) 4c ,q SPLiCIC �".."', s print owner's name) tsignaturel. / (address) ft-•-a, , 0.4.. ?S,2UI 9cy-9f/ ` (phone) (2) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) (phone) (3) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) (phone) eiS STATE OFell ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF '`Y�` SS before me this > day of �__,[ 19% , by .:L - 2ILA-624 (My commission expires: i - f t—Y f ) Notary Pub is 9 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owners in his rezoning application as their representative and that they hav qu ted that all correspondence enorrespoondence in this matter be mailed t/o/me: ///��/ (prirft representative's name) a ure 97& 4/ Ae4 ' — - c /� (mailin ddrfj ss) (phone) 4%/CW Or& , /2 g5 22, '�.,7- 7K`/._;, STATE OF -i,,, ) SS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF ,1,,�.,.,.,�. - ) before me this a day of r.,-✓- , 19, _ (My commission expires. j - If'-'IC ) Notary Public Page 2 of 2 A. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ilt/Ix1 0... 4(5 V4 ri/ , ITEM # 1I MEETING OF bO OS'' MOTION BY : SECONDED BY:_90-L1L____ YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR i COUNCILMAN HILL vri COUNCILMAN SHANKS V VICE MAYOR EIDSON iCOUNCILMAN BALJO _MAYOR CLARKF , UNAN IOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL V E SHEET NOTES 0 ... 4q)4„,,/,' 4 ITEM # Ull J o MEETING ®F 1 mi M TION BY: gait,106, SECONIED BY: 0 f4u1/ L Y,ES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL V Jc !cIu1AN TAYLOR j LNc1vr % VICE MAYOR EIDSON // . MAYOR CLARKE UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL NJ( ' on. ITEM NO. 11 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 343, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 343 BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 343, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-70-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO. 11 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 343, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 343 BY TITLE ONLY. Alm Stogy 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 343, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-70-84 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 349, PZ-1-85 THE APPLICANT IS SLOWINSKI 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION, 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED Pp ACHE U _ O Z "iPizONP ot ache �unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 27, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Approver for Agenda pate Item # THROUGH• MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER First Reading �,t//�l�'S fca ' Sacond Reading FROM: /`./CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ✓public Hearing — Old Business SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 New Business PZ-1-85 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 349) Consent Agenda Project Description Rezoning case No. PZ-1-85, Proposed Ordinance No. 349, is a request by the applicants Edward and Ann Slowinski through Jerry Burgess and Robert Jones to rezone their property from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone. The site is a 1.25 acre parcel located on the east side of Grand Drive, 165 feet south of Windsong Street developed with a mobile home in Section 18. It is designated Medium Density on the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include mobile homes, a house and vacant land. Planning Department Comments and Recommendations Staff had no objections to the rezoning noting that it would be consistent with the Medium Density General Plan designation for the site. Staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the west thirty-three feet (33' ) and the Public Works Director recommends the dedication of the south twenty-five feet (25' ) of the subject property (Concho Street alignment) for public roadway and associated purposes. By ordinance, 20 foot by 20 foot cut-offs are to be provided at street intersections. Staff also recommends stipulating that this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. Stipulations in Ordinance Staff and Commission both recommend roadway dedications and that the parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 9828002 Aft. Ask Honorable Mayor and City Council Agenda Item - April 16, 1985 PZ-1-85 (Proposed Ordinance No. 349) Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of March 26, 1985, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Jorgensen/Taylor 7-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-1-85, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 349, application of Edward and Ann Slowinski through Jerry Burgess and Robert Jones for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. The applicants dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. This parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City. 3. That any other stipulation requested by the City departments be complied with. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. It is in compliance with the General Plan. 2. It seems to be a good use for the property." CRN:mas i a� �pache &2uncL. `V n RECEiVED INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM APR ,2 1985 DATE April 1 , 1985 DEPT GF Ptr',i'drJ?NC AND DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning Dept. , Attn: Julie Reid " THRU: FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT. PZ-01-85 In discussion with your office and the applicant this morning, pertinent information was provided that included existing construction was in the area considered for future right—of—way. predicated on elaboration from the applicant, as this application would result in a land split similar to the immediate adjacent area to the East, it appears that access may be provided by a private easement. In these regards, to present and considering how the area interfaces with existing developments, the dedication for Concho Street in this particular application is not required. It's understood that with future lot spliting, the applicant must provide the City with an instrument providing for ingress and egress across certain properties. If further elaboration is required, please advise. RWB: th ow PZ-1-85 ORDINANCE NO. 349 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE 1 1 .ii:k 1 i ..m. W. WINDSONG ST. r r -----� j Ni TH " TH M/ I SF 1 GONchlo ST; il Z At.t6►iu�6NT Z Z W. FOOTHILL Si. ® SUBJECT SITE N -1-; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) SCALE. ' , , t I 0 200 400 r. ^ "Oily o C.pache c2unct,,,,n INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM RE C F ' D DATE: March 27, 1985 \ MAR 2 7 TO: Planning Department / 1 THRU: DEPT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FROM: Director of Public Works, /�� V -- SUBJECT: PZ-01-85 A field inspection was made to review development along the alignment for Concho Street. Considering how the area is presently split, and the potential for additional lot splitting to smaller lots, I believe that the dedications for alignment of Concho Street would be in the best interest of the City. In this regard, being a residential street, a 25' half right-of-way should be provided to include 20'x 20' cutoffs at street intersections. /'m\ RWB: sh File 100.08 �.S Ask Ask ORDINANCE NO 349 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-1-85 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, Amok ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcel of land described as The South } of the Northwest of the Southeast I of the Northwest ; of the Northeast ; of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone, subject to the following stipulations 1) the applicants dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes; and 2) this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 /ilk Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ORDINANCE NO 349 =.N ^RDIIIANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, By/AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AR ZONA, CHANGING" THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ- -85 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL F. TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY Cs FLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROV : NG FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINE► BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 0, THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. ^ SECTION I IN GE .RAL The zoning district assification on th- Zonin.g District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcel of 1. d described as The South # of the N. thwest o" the ,Southeast 1 of the Northwest S of the Nor heast •f Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gi a and alt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal C. nt , Ar.izona, be and hereby is amended from '' General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone, subject to the following sti%ula•ions: 1) the applicants dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33' ) an. the`s. th twenty-five feet (25') (Concho Street alignment) for public roa. ay and a sociated purposes; and 2) this parcel not be developed into a 'obile home • recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by he City. SECTION II REPEALI'G''ANY CONFLICTING P'OVISIONS All ordinances an Parts of ordinances in c. flict with the provisions of this Ordinance o-%any part of the code adopte' herein by reference are hereby repeale.. SECTION III 'ROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any se' ion, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clau -, or portion of this Ordinan : or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason/ eld to be invalid or unconstitutional by the d- ision of any court of c. •etent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the .-maining portions thereof. P' SED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 /ma\ Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk (L APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney s PZ-1-85 ORDINANCE NO. 349 REZONE FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE I I 1h1;1 C 1 1 W. WINDSONG ST. ---- -- 1 1 TH 1 TH 1 1% '// 1 1 i QI 1 1 -0.7.1 j c71 //il ---------1 _ 4 !a CG _1 z C] .1.1 Q cc 2n cD Q - z z W, FOOTHILL ST, 1 ill SUBJECT SITE N �_Jr 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) SCALE. i i r f t 0 200 400 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification Pr:el No 1 From GR To TH Parcel No. 2 Parcel No. 3 /'riak Parcel No 4 2 What is the General Plan designation for the site(s)? medium to high density opportunity 3 Size of the subject property: 1 1/4 acres [acres] [square feet] 4. How is the property currently developed? existing mobile home 5 What are the adjacent land uses? North Exisng,mobile homes South: Vacant land East Existing mobile homes West Existing mobile homes 6. The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter Section 18 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7. Why are you requesting this rezoning? To rezone property to its highest and best use (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No F 1. S Proposed Ordinance No 3 `-4 el Date Filed I- ID- Application received by - � Receipt No. (G 4 2.3 Fee Amount Page l of 2 4/18/84 8. I/We hereby certify that. a. (I am)(We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have truthfully completed this application for rezoning c. I/We understand the filing fees to be non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Com- /omb,„ mission and the City Council, and action to approve or disapprove our request is discretionary d I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway ana associated purposes e I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have Jerry E. Burgess and7or appointed Robert W. Jones III named below as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him to do anything whatsoever necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction (1) Edward J & Ann M Slowinski ' - L \,- (print owner's name) (signature) 2115 North Grand Drive (address) Apache Junction, AZ 85220 (phone) (2) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) (phone) (3) (print owner's name) (signature) (address) - (phone) STATE OF ARIZONA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNT( 0` ninal SS before me this /Dt/ day of Jan , 1935 , by Edward J. and Ann M. Slowinski • (My commission expires: - 5 `6,e ) Notary Public 9 I hereby certify that I have/ been appointed by the property owners in this rezoning application as their representative and that they_ha a requested that all correspondence in this matter be mailed me. Jerry E Burgess and Robert W. Jones III J ' j- e" (print representative's name) ignaturp 7007 East Apache Trail 832-2000 (mailing address) (phone) Mesa, Arizona 85207 _ STATE OF ARIZONA ) SS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged COUNTY OF Pena?_ ) before me this day of Jan. , 19 85 , by• Jerry E._Burgess and Robert W. Jones III (My commission 2,piies y/C/c-; -) No ry Wiblic Page 2 of 2 C. Tp Cioei Re ; g' .p4. L 3 , / 0-(..-c.-,4-4-44.414-,4_,. ..,-,:;-L "Ix,/ c. , Crt-' 17 , ' aCZ-i, ::....e ,-). 7y , ,,._4/.., 4.1eLe-c--(.. ,N.,11 ,)---9,,,,62---- 'VI) ce--y -c14-4... 64-4.-c--(7/ ,t_j___,,YLZAIdia, _?-tyi-C, .-C.4.�� k„---X4. ` fre.4,i1wC n-ck /) / A/✓✓✓4.----r.:, ..z,A...,z 3 1/41-4,, ,;.0-u.6 c,, .c.4 :.;,..c: aLLA.-1, -tt-11-4, ...ZoLea `t-L.;. Z-<._ ,61.1414-eL- ,c43.4-e-4,-,.. -,-/ fey C"- c CC v-u -1 eC c.."- L, Z-- « / ,c /.,7614,-, •,iit..4...-c_if,,-14-4, 1, tz, .� „..; Iill!I/' .I f „.4.d.e.,...44,-,..c.de V / A ,4•V /LJ L - sl ,'ily�.,c.,`f a..�:-",%..a,, E-Ga.-. /.7 vc 141 rc.C� c. -4"..--w.'.(2j:"1/6"-- '6.-- , ..r....o, --Z 9 1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 9 K ...... ,- J / , , 10 ( ITEM if PI MEET I NG OF 1/7/(1)/K MOTION BY : (.0V07 SECONDED BY .Y\6)111 YES NO ABSTAINED ij , I E MAYOR FTDSON NCILfMAN,_BALJO I NC ILMAN TAYLOR it COUNCILMAN HI] L COUNCILMAN SHANKS I1f113 NaAI°1A , _MAYOR CLARKE _ • UNANPOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE` SHEET NOTES ..� 6 ITEM # 10 MEETING OF 14S MOTION BY; SECONDED BY ; )ES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN /ICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN. KILL V YOR CLARKE j UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED [ ABSTAINED TOTAL Ask Agik ITEM NO. 12 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 349, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 349, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 349, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-1-85 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL AIM sok ITEM NO. 12 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 349, Step 1 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 349, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 349, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-1-85 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH TRAILER HOMESITE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 372, POLICE PERSONNEL POLICIES 'mik 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , (pi-ACHE � •L'- O :►U Z t, ! 4 q � ONP,. it/ o� 47'Iache C unction z April 10, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK ('/ SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 372 (POLICE POLICIES) The attached ordinance adopts the recently amended police personnel policies and procedures which was distributed to the Council in March. These policies have already been declared a public record by adoption of Resolution No. 85-15 on the Consent Agenda. This ordinance has been written with the Emergency Clause making it operative immediately upon its adoption. Please contact the Director of Public Safety if you have any questions on these amended policies. kmc `' Approver for Agenda A-C-, Date/ Item Y First Reading VGG/J5- /3 S c ",rf Reading r',lb'ic Hearing Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 H eiN 0141 ORDINANCE NO 372 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY if BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That Article 3-10 (B) Personnel System, be amended to read as follows: B That certain document entitled Police Policies and Procedures, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is hereby approved as per exhibit "C", adopted by the City Council and made a part hereof by reference SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immed- iately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1985. WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F ALEXANDER City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1.)) A / ()-2/) .,, ,,,\ c() ITEM # MEETING OF lgi (ta/C6 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:r)(1thiLtil YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC I L: ANLEI LL .. I . COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ._.COUNC I[MN SH.M KS ✓/ _VICF MAYOR EIDSON ._COUNCILMAN BALMJ MAYOR CLARKE J • UNA,'POUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET r NOTES ,- 11 I � / 1/r kj ITEM # i MEETING OF ��/JS-S POTION BY; SECONDED BY; 1 ' 007'. Y S I NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL CO UNC I LMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR EDSON COUNCILMAN BALJO __MAYOR_CLARKF UNANI!.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ` .r. Amm ITEM NO. 13 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 372, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 372, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 372, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL (With the Emergency Clause) 41102.. ITEM NO. 13 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 372, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 372, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 372, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL (With the Emergency Clause) PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 375, EQUESTIONS CROSSING ''k. 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , /PQ CHF� $6)6', 4141 n it o. C. 472ache unction APRIL 2, 1985 Am.. MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM. DIRECTOR OF P LIC WORKS ,,�,/ l f THROUGH. CITY MANAGER 4. l f REGARDING: HORSE CROSSINGS - LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD (AGENDA ITEM) A request has been received from Mr. and Mrs. Weaver, owners of the Superstition Stables, to install equestrian crossing signs on Lost Dutchman Boulevard. In accordance with Sections 12-2-4 and 12-2-5 of the City Code, the attached Ordinance No. 375 is submitted for your consideration and action. Approver for Agenda pate Item RWB: sh First Reading �1l/(;/ j /51 Second Reading �ublic Hearing --. - Old Business File 100.051 New Business - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 l ) O ,o.PJ,HC.e I.Rt-11r-1G Ss G N \ 0 L44424-1111-4G SIGN /OA N W11.7 30" x 30" 36" x 36" I I COUESTRUN I I XING I' ' I ` W11 7P I' ) 24" x 18" I I Ito© T 5no1 N 420t , IlT d- 1. f wrc*1 8t vp. - - - Q 11\ Z_ o_ J I 1 2 ` is di ' - 41 - g ) 1 / .J' ' - Lo p oN OF I4O2 o61 r1 5 orI Lost DUrutM ti ?' -up. Pitlkl. I"= 3.O l l'•••'''''' Ekl' 1]N G4 I-1 o9 'r T L d arIP=ir ORDINANCE NO 375 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING EQUESTRIAN CROSSINGS ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD, BETWEEN MERIDIAN AND DELAWARE DRIVES, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY ^ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL It is in the public interest to insure safe, effective and efficient traffic flow along public rights-of-way within the City of Apache Junction, and whereas the designation of equestrian crossings along certain roadways would be in the best interest of the public; now, therefore, be it ordained that the Director of Public Works and the Director of Public Safety are hereby empowered and directed to initiate appropriate action to install warning and advanced warning signs for equestrian crossings along Lost Dutchman Boulevard, East of Meridian Drive SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required by Chapter 12 of this code constitutes a civil traffic viola- tion. Civil traffic violations are subject to the provisions of Title 28, Chapter 6, Articles 20 and 21, Arizona Revised Statutes, and amendments thereto/ SECTION V EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immed- iately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1985 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor 111111, ORDINANCE NO 375 PAGE TWO ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• David F Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ( 4 ITEM # MEETING OF g0 MOTION BY : 1%0'4 SECONDED BY h611/) " YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC ILMAN TAYLOR COUNC I LMAN HILL 1 COUNCILMAN SHANKS t/ VICE_MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN BALJO __MAYOR_ CLARKF UNANITOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES L )91111)fr ... i P U.) ,(1) ITEM # I V MEETING OF I K MOTION BY: -11.\4SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO ' COUNCI L� .AP! SHANKS M .�. f_COUNCILMAN HILL ✓ coon...rim LriAN TAYLOR I L , _ R(f� VICE MAYOR EIDSON / , MAYOR CLARKE UNAN .1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Alma ITEM NO. 14 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 375, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 375, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 375, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING EQUESTRIAN CROSSINGS ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD, BETWEEN MERIDIAN AND DELAWARE DRIVES; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL (With the Emergency Clause) 411k. IOW Amk ITEM NO. 14 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 375, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 375, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 375, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING EQUESTRIAN CROSSINGS ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD, BETWEEN MERIDIAN AND DELAWARE DRIVES; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL (With the Emergency Clause) PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 377, SPEED LIMITS ''` 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , PQAC"F ✓G O O i ,,, Z '`1R/ZONP (nti,i4 4v4pac12eunction April 8, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND fltl7P9t OFIJE CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS(\)i...., �`� \ / THROUGH: CITY MANAGER :,�% REAGRDING: SPEED LIMITS In order to install and enforce speed limits on roadways recently constructed with the Citys 20 mile street improvement program ordinance No. 377 has been prepared for your consideration. Approver for Agenda f-'7 Date Item 0 First Reading 171717S__ ' Second Reading __._ RWB:th _yLFubic karrng Ci i U,usiness "Ic 3us,ness �,__,_Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 eiN ORDINANCE NO. 377 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AIRZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND IDAHO ROAD, TOMAHAWK ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULE- VARD AND STATE ROUTE 88, SOUTHERN AVENUE BETWEEN TOMAHAWK ROAD AND CORTEZ ROAD, GOLDFIELD ROAD BETWEEN LOST DUTCHMAN AND U S HIGHWAY 60, TEPEE STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND IDAHO ROAD, SHIPROCK STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND MAIN DRIVE, ROUNDUP STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND SAN MARCOS DRIVE, SAN MARCOS DRIVE BETWEEN BROADWAY AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE. TEPEE STREET BETWEEN STATE ROUTE 88 AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, JUNCTION STREET BETWEEN IDAHO ROAD AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, 4TH AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, CORTEZ ROAD BETWEEN SOUTHERN AVENUE AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, STARR ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, HILTON ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND BROADWAY AVENUE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL It is in the public interest to insure safe, efffective and efficient traffic flow along public rights-of-way within the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, and it has been determined speed limits are necessary for the public safety, therefore, the speed limit be established at 35 M P H on Lost Dutchman Boulevard between Meridian Drive and Idaho Road, Tomahawk Road between Superstition Boulevard and State Route 88, Southern Avenue between Tomahawk Road and Cortez Road, Goldfield Road between Lost Dutchman Boulevard and U S Highway 60, and that the speed limit be established at 30 M.P.H. on• Tepee Street between Meridian Drive and Idaho Road, Shiprock Street between Meridian Drive and Main Drive, Roundup Street between Meridian Drive to San Marcos Drive, San Marcos Drive between Broadway Avenue and Southern Avenue, Tepee Street between State Route 88 and Goldfield Road, Junction Street between Idaho Road and Goldfield Road, 4th Avenue between Winchester Road and Goldfield Road, Cortez Road between Southern Avenue and U S Highway 60, Starr Road between Superstition Boulevard and U.S. Highway 60, Hilton Road between Superstition Boulevard and Broadway Avenue, and that the Director of Public Works and the Director of Public Safety are hereby empowered and directed to initiate appropriate action to install the speed limit signs and enforce the speed limits on the refer- enced streets. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decisions of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of any violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required by Chapter 12 of this code constitutes a civil traffic violation Civil traffic violations are subject to the provisions of Title 28. Chapter 6, Articles 20 and 21, Arizona Revised Statutes, and amendments thereto. eiS ORDINANCE NO 377 PAGE TWO SECTION V EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adopted PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1985 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST: ( Kathleen Connelly t City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F. Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE HEET NOTES ( ( „i .)/ /( 7))pe./ ti ITEM # MEETING OF 1 MOT I ON BY: AbVf\2SECONDED BY : )\4-A./iL YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN RA] in VICE MAYOR EIDSON / • COUNCILMAN I LMAN TAYLOR U COUNCILMAN HILL .MAYOR CLARKE UNANV1OUS IN FAVOR I OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES I ((lejl I lu ITEM # l MEETING OF `� �� i MOTION BY; SECONDED BY ; YES NO ABSTAINED COMIC I L"'ArtI LL :// COi_�^1C ILLAIL TAYLOR _.COUNC II MAN SHANKS J_VIIF MAYOR EIDSON ,_000NCILMAN.BALJO MAYOR CLARKE �� •/ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Aft ok ITEM NO. 15 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 377, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 377, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 377, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND IDAHO ROAD, TOMAHAWK ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND STATE ROUTE 88, SOUTHERN AVENUE BETWEEN TOMAHAWK ROAD ADN CORTEZ ROAD, GOLDFIELD ROAD BETWEEN LOST DUTCHMAN AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, TEPEE STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND IDAHO ROAD, SHIPROCK STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND MAIN DRIVE, ROUNDUP STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND SAN MARCOS DRIVE, SAN MARCOS DRIVE BETWEEN BROADWAY AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, TEPEE STREET BETWEEN STATE ROUTE 88 AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, JUNCTION STREET BETWEEN IDAHO ROAD AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, 4TH AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, CORTEZ ROAD BETWEEN SOUTHERN AVENUE AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, STARR ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, HILTON ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND BROADWAY AVENUE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL (With the Emergency Clause) Asmiik ITEM NO. 15 S;;p 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 377, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 377, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 377, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND IDAHO ROAD, TOMAHAWK ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND STATE ROUTE 88,SOUTHERN AVENUE BETWEEN TOMAHAWK ROAD ADN CORTEZ ROAD, GOLDFIELD ROAD BETWEEN LOST DUTCHMAN AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, TEPEE STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND IDAHO ROAD, SHIPROCK STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND MAIN DRIVE, ROUNDUP STREET BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND SAN MARCOS DRIVE, SAN MARCOS DRIVE BETWEEN Am\ BROADWAY AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE, TEPEE STREET BETWEEN STATE ROUTE 88 AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, JUNCTION STREET BETWEEN IDAHO ROAD AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, 4TH AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, CORTEZ ROAD BETWEEN SOUTHERN AVENUE AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, STARR ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND U.S. HIGHWAY 60, HILTON ROAD BETWEEN SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD AND BROADWAY AVENUE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL (With the Emergency Clause) PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 378, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , (T.':.S)/NCHE dG " ` ' 0 U r� � Z 'c1RrzoNP c 0 iLy on pacheunction p April 9, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MBERS,, OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK , (;,' THROUGH: CITY MANAGER �.Y" '/. REGARDING: TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES In conjunction with the Citys 20 mile street improvement program, it has been determined that additional traffic control devices are needed. _n addition, as field inspections and research was performed, it was discovered that certain existing signs have not been approved by ordinance. Attached is a list of existing and proposed traffic control devices for your consideration and action. RWB:th Approver for Agenda •e , (Date, Item It— First Reading 1t/'e'P' -- /(' Second Reading ✓ Punic Hearing Old ruCiness New Business Consent Agenda 1 C01 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ORDINANCE NO. 378 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS FOR STOP SIGNS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL It is in the public interest to insure safe, effective and efficient traffic flow along public rights—of—way within the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, and whereas, it has been determined that traffic control devices are necessary for public safety, now therefore be it ordained that stop signs be designated at the following locations• Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Meridian Drive Westbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Ironwood Drive Westbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at State Route 88 Westbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Goldfield Road Westbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Delaware Drive Northbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman at Grand Drive Northbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Valley Drive Northbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman at San Marcos Drive Northbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Cortez Road Northbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Goldfield Road Northbound (Proposed), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Ironwood Drive Eastbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Idaho Road Eastbound (Existing), Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Goldfield Road Eastbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Meridian Drive Westbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Delaware Drive Westbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Delaware Drive Eastbound (Existing), Shiprock Street at Meridian Drive Westbound (Existing), Shiprock Street at Delaware Drive Westbound (Existing), Shiprock Street at Delaware Drive Eastbound (Existing), Shiprock Street at Warner Drive Northbound (Existing). Shiprock Street at Grand Drive Northbound (Proposed), Shiprock Street at Main Drive Northbound (Proposed), Roundup Street at Meridian Drive Westbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Warner Drive Westbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Ironwood Drive Westbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Valley Drive Westbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Delaware Drive Westbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Warner Drive Eastbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Delaware Drive Eastbound (Existing). Roundup Street at Ironwood Drive Eastbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Valley Drive Eastbound (Existing), Roundup Street at San Marcos Eastbound (Existing), Roundup Street at Cedar Drive Northbound (Proposed), Roundup Street at Grand Drive Northbound (Proposed), Roundup Street at Main Drive Northbound (Proposed), Roundup Street at Gold Drive Northbound (Proposed), Roundup Street at Cedar Drive Southbound (Proposed), Roundup Street at Grand Drive Southbound (Proposed). Roundup Street at Main Drive Southbound (Proposed), Roundup Street at Gold Drive Southbound (Proposed), 16th Avenue at Monterey Drive Northbound (Proposed), 16th Avenue at Plaza Drive Northbound (Existing), 16th Avenue at Papago Drive Northbound (Proposed), 16th Avenue at Buena Vista Drive Southbound (Existing), 17th Avenue at San Marcos Drive Westbound (Proposed), 17th Avenue at Monterey Drive Westbound (Proposed), 17th Avenue at Plaza Drive Westbound (Proposed), 17th Avenue at Buena Vista Drive Northbound (Proposed), 17th Avenue at Monterey Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 17th Avenue at Papago Drive Eastbound (Existing), 17th Avenue at Plaza Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 18th Avenue at Monterey Drive Westbound (Proposed), 41P1� ORDINANCE NO 378 PAGE TWO 18th Avenue at Plaza Drive Westbound (Proposed), 18th Avenue at Moreno Drive Northbound (Proposed), 18th Avenue at Apache Drive Northbound (Proposed), 18th Avenue at Coconino Drive Northbound (Proposed), 18th Avenue at Coconino Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 19th Avenue at San Marcos Drive Westbound (Proposed), 19th Avenue at Buena Vista Drive Southbound (Proposed), 19th Avenue at Buena Vista Northbound (Proposed), 19th Avenue at Monterey Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 20th Avenue at Idaho Road Eastbound (Existing), 20th Avenue at Del Rio Drive Northbound (Proposed), 20th Avenue at Apache Drive Northbound (Proposed), 20th Avenue at Cocoino Drive Northbound (proposed), 20th Avenue at Plaza Drive Southbound (Proposed), 20th Avenue at Moreno Drive Southbound (Proposed), 20th Avenue at Apache Drive Southbound (Existing), 20th Avenue at Coconino Drive Southbound (Existing), 20th Avenue at Papago Drive Southbound (Existing), 21st Avenue at San Marcos Drive Westbound (Proposed), 21st Avenue at De! Rio Drive Westbound (Proposed), 21st Avenue at Del Rio Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 21st Avenue at Apache Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 21st Avenue at Buena Vista Drive Southbound (Proposed), 21st Avenue at Buena Vista Drive Northbound (Proposed), Del Rio Drive at Southern Avenue Southbound (Existing), 22nd Avenue at Buena Vista Drive Westbound (Proposed), 22nd Avenue at Del Rio Drive Westbound (Proposed), ' 22nd Avenue at Del Rio Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 22nd Avenue at Idaho Road Eastbound (Proposed), 22nd Avenue at Apache Drive Southbound (Proposed), 22nd Avenue at Coconino Drive Southbound (Proposed), 22nd Avenue at Apache Drive Northbound (Proposed), 22nd Avenue at Coconino Drive Northbound (Proposed), 23rd Avenue at Del Rio Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 23rd Avenue at Apache Drive Eastbound (Proposed), 23rd Avenue at Del Rio Drive Westbound (Proposed). Southern Avenue at Del Rio Drive Southbound (Existing), Southern Avenue at Apache Drive Southbound (Proposed), San Marcos Drive at Broadway Northbound (Existing), San Marcos Drive at 12th Avenue Westbound (Proposed), San Marcos Drive at 16th Avenue Eastbound (Existing), San Marcos Drive at 16th Avenue Westbound (Existing), San Marcos Drive at 16th AVenue Southbound (Existing), San Marcos Drive at 16th Avenue Northbound (Existing), San Marcos Drive at Southern Avenue Southbound (Existing), Foothill Street at State Route 88 Westbound (Existing), Foothill Street at Wickup Road Northbound (Existing), Foothill Street at Bowman Road Northbound (Existing), Foothill Street at Cortez Road Northbound (Existing), Foothill Street at Cortez Road Southern (Existing), Foothill Street at Starr Road Southbound (Existing), Tepee Street at State Route 88 Westbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Tomahawk Road Southbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Vista Road Southbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Wickiup Road Southbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Bowman Road (Existing), Tepee Street at Cortez Road Southbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Acacia Road Southbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Starr Road Southbound (Proposed). Tepee Street at Tomahawk Road Northbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Vista Road Northbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Wickiup Road Northbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Bowman Road Northbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Cortez Road Northbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Acacia Road Northbound (Existing), Tepee Street at Starr Road Northbound (Proposed). Tepee Street at Goldfield Road Eastbound (Proposed), Supestition Boulevard at Tomahawk Road Southbound (Existing), Supestition Boulevard at Vista Road Southbound (Existing). Superstition Boulevard at Wickiup Road Southbound (Proposed), Superstition Boulevard at Cortez Road Southbound (Existing), ORDINANCE NO. 378 PAGE THREE Superstition Boulevard at Acacia Road Southbound (Proposed), Superstition Boulevard at Hilton Road Southbound (Existing), Superstition Boulevard at Starr Road Southbound (Existing), Superstition Boulevard at Goldfield Road Southbound (Existing), Superstition Boulevard at Tomahawk Road Northbound (Proposed), Superstition Boulevard at Vista Road Northbound (Proposed), Superstition Boulevard at Cortez Northbound (Proposed), Superstition Boulevard at Starr Road Northbound (Existing), Superstition Boulevard at Hilton Road Northbound (Existing), Superstition Boulevard at Goldfield Northbound (Proposed), Scenic Street at Starr Road Southbound (Existing), Scenic Street at Starr Road Northbound (Existing), Scenic Street at Hilton Road Westbound (Proposed), Scenic Street at Hilton Road Eastbound (Existing), Scenic Street at Goldfield Eastbound (Proposed), Cactus Wren at Starr Road Westbound (Existing), Cactus Wren at Hilton Road Eastbound (Existing), Junction Street at Idaho Road Westbound (Existing), Junction Street at Winchester Road Westbound (Existing), Junction Street at Tomahawk Road Westbound (Existing), Junction Street at Hilton Road Westbound (Existing), Junction Street at Winchester Road Eastbound (Existing), Junction Street at Tomahawk Road Eastbound (Existing), Junction Street at Hilton Road Eastbound (Existing), Junction Street at Goldfield Road Eastbound (Existing), Junction Street at Royal Palm Road Southbound (Existing), Junction Street at Cactus Road Southern (Proposed), Junction Street at Wickiup Road Southbound (Existing), Junction Street at Cortez Road Southbound (Existing), Junction Street at Acacia Road Southbound (Existing). Junction Street at Starr Road Southbound (Existing), Junction Street at Colt Road Northbound (Existing), Junction Street at Royal Palm Road Northbound (Existing), ( Junction Street at Wickiup Road Northbound (Existing), Junction Street at Cortez Road Northbound (Existing). Junction Street at Cactus Road Northbound (Proposed), Junction Street at Acacia Road Northbound (Existing), Junction Street at Starr Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Winchester Road Westbound (Eastbound) (Existing), 4th Avenue at Tomahawk Road Westbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Outpost Road Westbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Winchester Road Eastbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Tomahawk Road Eastbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Goldfield Road Eastbound (Proposed), 4th Avenue at Colt Road Southbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Royal Palm Road Southbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Cactus Road Southbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Vista Road Southbound (Proposed), 4th Avenue at Wickiup Road Southbound (Existing). 4th Avenue at Cortez Road Southbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at STarr Road Southbound (Proposed), 4th Avenue at Hilton Road Southbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Colt Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Royal Palm Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Cactus Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Vista Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Wickiup Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Cortez Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Starr Road Northbound (Existing), 4th Avenue at Hilton Road Northbound (Proposed), Tomahawk Road at Broadway Avenue Southbound (Existing), Tomahawk Road at Broadway Avenue Northbound (Existing), Tomahawk Road at 12th Avenue Westbound (Existing), Tomahawk Road at U S Highway 60 Southbound (Existing), Tomahawk Road at 19th Avenue Eastbound (Existing). Tomahawk Road at 20th Avenue Eastbound (Existing), Tomahawk Road at 21st Avenue Eastbound (Existing), Tomahawk Road at 22nd Avenue Eastbound (Existing), Tomahawk Road at 23rd Avenue Eastbound (Existing), Mariposa Road at 20th Avenue Westbound (Proposed), Mariposa Road at 21st Avenue Westbound (Proposed), Mariposa Road at 22nd Avenue Westbound (Proposed), /^Is ORDINANCE NO. 378 PAGE FOUR Mariposa Road at 23rd Avenue Westbound (Proposed), Mariposa Road at Southern Avenue Southbound (Proposed), Cortez Road at U.S. Highway 60 Northbound (Existing), STarr Road at Broadway Avenue Northbound (Existing), Starr Road at Broadway Avenue Southbound (Existing), Starr Road at 12th Avenue Westbound (Existing), Starr Road at U S. Highway 60 Northbound (Existing), Starr Road at U S Highway 60 Southbound (Existing), Goldfield Road at Broadway Avenue Southbound (Existing), Goldfield Road at Broadway Avenue Northbound (Existing), Goldfield Road at 13th Avenue Eastbound (Existing), Goldfield Road at 16th Avenue Eastbound (Existing), Goldfield Road at U.S Highway 60 Southbound (Existing), Furthermore the Director of Public Works and the Director of Public Safety are hereby empowered and directed to initiate appropriate action to install and enforce said traffic control devices SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SERVERABILITY If any section, subsection, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of any violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required by Chapter 12 of this code constitutes a civil traffic violation. Civil traffic violations are subject to the provisions of Title 28, Chapter 6, Article 20 and 21, Arizona Revised Status, and amendments thereto SECTION V EMERGENCY CLAUSE �\ It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an amergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1985 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor 1 O rs ORDIANACE NO. 378 PAGE FIVE ATTEST Kathlees Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• David F. Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 °7151' 1)1 .,\ 1\1:1 \ ITEM 11_4_ LillI r MEETING OF 1,0 MOTION BY: '1 SECONDED BY: 1\61011L" VES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE_MAYOR FIDSON J COUNCILMAN BALJO _ RMAYO _ C LARK F ✓ _ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (t-1 j1/10 (CI _oft v ITEM # MEETING OF tflin c MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: COP"2 YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTDSON v COUNCILMAN. BALJO ✓ COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HTI I I COUNCILMAN SHANKS _C I 0 MAYOR CLARKE UNANIF1.0 S IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 16 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 378, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 378, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 378, .-. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS FOR STOP SIGNS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL (With the Emergency Clause) ITEM NO. 16 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 378, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 378, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 378, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS FOR STOP SIGNS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL (With the Emergency Clause) PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 379, INITIATIVE PETITIONS 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY CLERK AND COUNCILMAN BALJO 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , Ns)NCNE ✓ (---- c tN . t gRIZ -IA P CC it o &471acke unction Approver for Agenda 4e� April 9, 1985 Date item # First Reading �f L _��' Second Paading ✓ Pt b is Hearing MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Old Business New Business THROUGH: CITY MANAGER Consent Agenda FROM: CITY CLERat1 SUBJECT. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 379 (INITIATIVE PETITIONS) As discussed at the April 1st Council work session, the attached ordinance has been written to amend the City Code by adding a new article pertaining directly to the initiative petition process. The ordinance addresses those areas only where the city has jurisdiction in establishing requirements and guidelines or where state law is unclear. The areas addressed are as follows: Signature Requirements-The State Constitution stipulates that there is a 15% signature requirement to file an initiative petition. It also grants authority to the city to establish the time frame on which this signature amount is based. The proposed amendment to the code establishes the last preceding election at which members were elected to the council as the basis for counting the number of eligible electors from which the 15% ,�-►, is computed. Filing Deadline-There is a contradiction between the State statutes (90 days) and the State Constitution (4 months) regarding the time limit for filing an initiative petition. A legal opinion issued by the Attorney General supports the four month requirement. This amendment to the code adopts the four month deadline. Clerk' s Duties-Clearly outlines the duties of the clerk regarding initiative petitions. It reflects duties as already outlined by State law, but also spells out that the clerk shall not be responsible for preparing the actual petition format on a one-by-one basis nor prepare the actual text of the proposed measure. Applicant Responsibilities-Enforces the responsibility of the applicant to insure that he/she is complying with the legal requirements of the state and the city pertaining to the initiative process. This ordinance has been written with the emergency clause and would become effective immediately upon its adoption. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 WITMEr OIS ORDINANCE NO. 379 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1 GENERAL, BY ADDING ARTICLE 1-11 INITIATIVE PETITIONS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS' SECTION I IN GENERAL That the Apache Junction City Code, Chapter 1 GENERAL, be amended by adding Article 1-11 Initiative Petitions, to read as follows ARTICLE 1-11 Initiative Petitions 1-11-1 Number of Signatures Required 1-11-2 Petition Filing Deadline 1-11-3 Duties of the City Clerk 1-11-4 Responsibilities of the Applicant Sec. 1-11-1 Number of Signatures Required Fifteen percent of the total number of registered voters qualified to vote in the last preceding municipal election at which a member or members of the city council were elected shall be the basis on which the number of electors of the city required to file an initiative petition shall be computed Sec 1-11-2 Petition Filing Deadline All petitions submitted under this section shall be filed with the city clerk not less than four months preceding the date of the election at which the measures so proposed are to be voted upon Sec. 1-11-3 Duties of the City Clerk A Upon receipt of an application for an initiative petition number as provided by Arizona Revised Statutes 19-111 and amendments thereto, the City Clerk shall assign an official number to said petitions and issue that number to the applicant B. The City Clerk shall furnish to each applicant an initiative petition form as provided by the Secretary of State's office and a copy of the text of Arizona Revised Statutes Title 19 Initiative, Referendum and Recall, and this Article 1-11 C It shall not be the responsibility of the City Clerk to furnish the applicant with a completed initiative petition form containing the proposed law or measure to be initiated or to provide the text of the proposed law or measure to be initiated D Unless otherwise stated by this code, the duties of the city clerk with regard to initiative petitions shall be the same as prescribed in A.R S Title 19 and amendments thereto, and the Arizona Constitution Sec 1-11-4 Responsibilities of the Applicant It shall be the responsibility of the applicant for an initiative petition to comply with the procedures for an initiative as prescribed in A R S Title 19, the Arizona State Constitution and this Code. ORDINANCE NO 379 PAGE ONE OF TWO 111,013 SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this /� ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any / reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessaey for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1985. WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY fl City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney lnN, ORDINANCE NO. 379 PAGE TWO OF TWO ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 6\ ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: *0) SECONDED BY: q‘,1) YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS f I COUNCILMAN Min j VICE MAYOR EIDSON COUNCILMAN TAYLOR J I • COUNCILMAN Imo- IL L MAYOR CLARKE UNAN !.^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES tc) i) /C ITEM # MEETING 0 lift° MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED ialEYSIEEDAIT COI NC I LMAN HILL COLJNC ILN'AN TAYLOR _COUNCILN19N _SH ANKS �?I CF MAYOR EIDSON ..COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR CLARKE UNAN r^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ur. b. Al mak ITEM NO. 17 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 379, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 379, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO, 379, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1 GENERAL, BY ADDING ARTICLE 1-11 INITIATIVE PETITIONS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. FOR APPROVAL (With the Emergency Clause) Amok oft. ITEM NO. 17 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 379, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 379, BY TITLE ONLY WITH �.. THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 379, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 1 GENERAL, BY ADDING ARTICLE 1-11 INITIATIVE PETITIONS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE DENIED. FOR DENIAL (With the Emergency Clause) PUBLIC HEARING r 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE oak THE APPLICANT IS AMERICAN LEGION POST 27 2, IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME, 3, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, t • NpACHE ✓�, O( i ti t) a m„1 ' qR C1P' ity o , /�pache & 2tion IZO� April 9, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK L., SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT --- APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE, AMERICAN LEGION, POST 27 In accordance with the procedures for processing applications for Special Event Liquor Licenses, inspections were conducted by the Department of Public Safety at the premises at Saguaro and Apache Trail , Apache Junction. As of this date, there have been no objections addressed to the City on this matter. Correspondence was received from the Director of Public Safety for the Special Event to be held on April 21 , 1985. The next step is for the Council to hold a public hearing on the application and make recommendation for approval or disapproval to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control . lvc Approver for Agenda 4C,_ Date Item First Reading t'Y/(t/Y /t Second Reading ✓ Pubic L+earnng Old Business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 Amk ... QACHE O( �P rt, ,41/ , ah If (1 ` ' °� O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 0 1t ;. Z q;ZoN i v pac�is Cunction W E McDANIEL Drector p 14, April 9, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly FROM: Director of Public Safety, W.E. McDaniel a./i. SUBJECT: Application for Special Event Liquor License, American Legion, Post 27 This Department can find no reason to deny the Special Event Liquor License to the American Legion, Post 27, located on Saguaro at Apache Trail. WEM/aes 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD. • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 , ..... .:,-.., \ .. . .. 1/._....__ > i If G— O i l t / i' / f /i #i .i 7 //fiEs,l i__.,--_/_r,_•_-.-.;.- , \ ,t, . 7 . •. . "\ N . \ N -\\ \ -.„ \ J \ .„ -..„,...... 4 , • t .. ,, 1 ., •,„__ z._ ,.__ • i ., .---4 ----- 1 ts nAI I\ I 1 ' ' :::_.• ) :,.4 ,''' .: ,.. '1k -,..k .‘N T - 1, .i ---- .- ' `-t. i, • P'-c,- I \ . l SS 17 - ,,,,,-'1 \ ,.,.. ,,---E t , - I -"-',...„„..,,,,, t,,)/ Heti ,,,, .. I - i . ~ t '' .. -..___. N I 1 /9°( -- i i 1 IL:1"1 ...C_1 ., .. i-----"" 1 \T — V------— - • f ,,I I i 1 572-i7* ..-- ._ I ei , L.T.,.:;,) \ \., \ . - 1 \ \ \ , , . , / i ) i i—: ,'t. i Al„Y.. ,./.'t/Q.,„.. ._.-• • I Ask — e"� Form 120S C C APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FEE - $ 25.00 PER DAY 1 The Organization applying is a. (Check one box only) ❑ Political party, ballot measure Fraternal organization with regular or campaign committee membership and in existence for over five (5) years. ❑ Religious Charitab or Civic 2 Person making application...64.11).6)5,/I TT Last name First Middle 3 Name of Organization. kirkle/e N f1,46/cN K,57'a. 4 Date/s of event. A pp, j- /! i5 Between the hours of./A Ned �;CLfh 5. Location of event• _SSG )Ai )A7,4r,4et/- Aik Do not use P 0 Box nu ber 4PACILE Ve-7 c�A) Nz fir;aC City Zip Code 6 Is the event location within the incorporated limits of the above city. OYES 0 NO 7. Mailing address. �7/ IJCJ(3// Pj,�&Wc d(��-- C1; <?..522O City State Zip 8. Has the owner of the location where your special event is to be held given permis- sion for this license on the date/s indicated• inYES ONO �1 9 Name and address of event site owner. Ati R/'.A,{.j A 67OP 1- 5T 7 10. Give telephone numbers for- / Qom() $72-C2.Q Event site Event site owner Applicant's home 11. Have you received and attached hereto the City or County approval of your special event license: in YES 0 NO (If not, explain in writing) 12. Alcoholic beverages sold under a special event license must be purchased from a licensed Arizona off-sale retailer Do you agree to do so: ®YES ONO 13 Do you understand that you cannot sell alcoholic beverages to be consumed away from the event site: ®YES ONO 14. How manysp special event licenses have you or the organization had this calendar , 15. Are you familiar with Arizona Liquor Laws and Regulations- RYES ONO 16 Wh security precautions will be, jaken to prevent liquor violations at the event. RS,9 ),)j // 8 i apc) XJ50 /19,c'mbi s / J, T,,1c,/oti ,¢T� ,J.), // 0 NE /c' /I 1J A� snip C-%/'c .s I, !� T12Tf1 l�f��tJG{1U�_CF) , being first duly sworn upon oath, hereby depose Printed name of applicant swear, and declare, under penalty of perjury, that I am the applicant, or agent if applicant is a club or corporation, making the foregoing application and that said application has been read and that the contents thereof and all statements contained therein are true, correct and complete. ,P ignature o' app ant SUBSCRIBED Ili MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this , day of �rj< _t1 19 FOR D L.L.C. USE ONLY Q < �,/ Aionroved by Signature of Noy Pubic My Commission expires on: Cye /� /2I7 Date Ccrr,,ents• SPP rPVorco 4nr tout of CPnttnn t_9n1 f19 4 P C nn.i AnmIlntinn U i/liOLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES .)i-}).): ITEM # MEET I�JG OF moil ON BY; (01SECONDED BY ; WW1 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN! SHANKS ✓/ VICE MAYOR FIIlSON aerrOCIATMarelt L_COUNCILMAN BALJO __MAYOR_CLARKF I UNANI!IOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 18 I MOVE THAT THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY AMERICAN LEGION, POST 27, FOR A SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE, TO BE HELD ON APRIL 21, 1985, BE RECOMMENDED THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL FOR (APPROVAL/DENIAL) . /^ Ask (-- i,..S.ACNF k ,R'„it' A..-.4v4, 4. ,.-.• 'IPlz0NP (/Jit y o � Jache c 2unction March 27, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK et SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT--- APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, KC BAR BQ In accordance with the procedures for processing applications for liquor licenses, notice was posted on the premises at 333 West Apache Trail , Apache Junction, on the 13th day of March, 1985, by the Deputy City Clerk. The notice remained posted for twenty (20) days, during which time written arguments in favor of or in opposition to the proposed Person Transfer were to be filed with the City Clerk. As of this date, there have been no objections addressed to the City on this matter. Correspondence was received from the Director of Public Safety and the Director of Public Works, a copy of which is attached. The next step in the procedure is for the City Council to hold a public hearing ,,.. on the application and make recommendation for approval or disapproval to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control . lvc Attachments A,Ipp-over for Agenda /L2, ri Item # l q Sepit _ 'ulna Vik 2 } JN'.. •-'wring �—!d LJ='i•ss _ New G&a.n:ess Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE)UNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 AL,�f . .I r *� �^ r NA ,, �J •fJJ t�i7 7..}v€ c;i April 5, 1985 Department of Liquor Licenses and Control 1645 W. Jefferson, Suite 227 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Dear Sirs: At their regular meeting of April 2, 1985, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, voted to recommmend denial of the appli- cation for Person Transfer of a Series 6 Liquor License for the KC Bar BQ, due to the many police related incidents at this location. The required forms are enclosed for your action. Please forward written verification upon approval or denial of this application. Sincerely, Kathleen Connelly City Clerk lvc Enclosures 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE !':NOTION ARIZONA 85220 01 Q0 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 P?ACHE U v l''i,- , : Z i ;``O //II o ` vacICe —71z nctzon March 13 , 1985 NOTICE The attached application for a Person Transfer of a Series 6 Liquor License , submitted by Ms Jane Ellen Merryman, agent for KC Bar BQ, 783 S. Meridian, Apache Junction, Arizona, was posted by the Deputy City Clerk on the 13th day of March, 1985, at 3 : 00 p.m. Any person who is a bona fide resident of the age of nineteen ( 19 ) years or more, residing, owning or leasing property within one half ( II ) mile radius from the proposed premises to be licensed, may file written arguments in favor thereof, or objections thereto with the City Clerk at City Hall within twenty ( 20 ) days after the date of posting. No arguments for, nor objections against, shall be filed thereafter. A public hearing will be held Tuesday, April 2 , 1985 , at the City Council Chambers , 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, at 7 : 00 p .m. , at which time any objections filed will be heard. ;Ka_t 1 / () . e _ c.., ,,,_,_,,_, „,,,,.... ,v, C /A Khleen Connelly � Vif � " - C/r�"t. �0 - 2 /) / Np 1 CityEL_ y ,__, I lvc 1 Attachments 1 QO t NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 „....4, ,....... rACHF k ,,,.;,41,,-, //t/ v i i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY . "lPiZ ONP l(Jity UT 47ictchB unction W.E.McDANIEL Director /^ March 25, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk FROM: W.E. McDaniel, Director of Public Safety Verb/ SUBJECT: Application for Person Transfer of Series 6 Liquor License, KC Bar BQ Upon investigation, this Department can find no reason to deny the Series 6 Liquor License to the KC Bar BC, located at 783 S. Meridian, Apache Junction, Arizona, whose agent is Ms. Jane Ellen Merryman. WEM/aes 1 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD. • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8260 Ofti eA-r /: li /. p � ' . Q r� � d.'sue" + �Y: iuf,, *.: s ... Zi , 4---, - �1Z0 �,/ `pity at 'pache &2unction .-. March 21 , 1985 Memorandum to: City Clerk \ I)J6;7) From: Director of Public Works; Regarding: Application for Person Transfer of Series 6 Liquor License, KC BAR BQ No objection is expressed to the above referenced application. RWB sh File 304 . 09 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSM AND CONTROL AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Date of Posting: March 13 , 1985 Applicant: Ms Jane Ellen Merryman for KC Bar BQ Address of Premises: 783 S. Meridian Apache Junction, AZ 85220 License(s) Applied for: Person Transfer of Series 6 Liquor License I hereby certify that pursuant to Section 4-201, A.R.S., I did post notice in a conspicuous place on the premises concerning the above liquor license(s) and said notice shall remain posted for a period of at least 20 consecutive days. Signature of City/County Clerk or Representative: r 7 (IA/ LL4,I ' C 1 !c2 Dated: 41lt- i Jv / % 7Q5— Return this affidavit with your recommendation and any related petitions to: Department of Liquor Licenses and Control 1645 West Jefferson, Suite 227 Phoenix, AZ &5007 *For text of Section 4-201, A.R.S., please see reverse. REV 8/81 FORM 128 March 25, 1985 Jity council members Apache Jct.nri z. AEE:Liquor License # 06t11020 Dear Jouncil Me)ibers; The liquor license #06:t1 102u for the K. 0.Jar 13. . Apache Jct. Arizona set for hearing Tuesday April 2, 1965 is being transferred to a third party, dane Merryman. The license in question nas a mortgage of ;18, 489. 00 still due to the original license holder,Kay A.larks i.T. 1 ,Mountain View, o. I would like the mortgage to be duly noted with the license transfer and that the license transferee be made aware that the mortgage and the amount exists on the license. ems Thank You, eaAiw Kay y.rarks At. 1 Mouhtin View,mo. 65548 • • FORM 120 • RSV 10/I4 ® -I)L L C USE ONLY- STATE OF ARIZONA I I oa o DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL OG• 1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 100 NORTH STONE A%ENUE,SUITE 904 PHOENIX,AZ 85007 TUCSON,AZ 85701 6021255-5J41 6021628-5831 APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE Type or print with black ink NOTE PROCESSING OF MOST APPLICATIONS TAKES 90 DAYS,AND CIRCUMSTANCES '- ' OFTEN RESULT IN A LONGER WAITING PERIOD THEREFORE YOU ARE f r CAUTIONED REGARDING EXTENSIVE FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS PLANS FOR A GRAND OPENING,ETC.,BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF THE LICENSE • SECTION 1. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A. J I /1 ❑ NEW LICENSE,Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 14 15 Reviewed by 5 opted by: SW V y PERSON TRANSFER SERIES 6&9s ONLY Complete Section 2,3,4 114 15l Current file flagged by N LI LOCATION TRANSFER 6&9s ONLY Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 1 t4 /5 Copies mode for posting by' ❑ NEW AGENT FOR CORP OR CLUB,Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 11 14 15 Copies mailed for posting by; Oute ❑ PROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT Complete Sections 2,3,4 5,12,14,151faa not required) Copies for becxground by Date- �,< O GOVERNMENT LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 13 14,15 Comments. O �� • SECTION 2 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP • REF DATA y� INDIVIDUAL.Complete Section 7 ❑ CLUB Complete Section 8 CLAIM 31 T R .` T R DATE CODE AMT ❑ PARTNERSHIP,(,Omtion 7 0 GOVERNMENT ❑ CORPORATION,Complete Section 8 0 OTHER,explain - SECTION ilt APP INT. (All applicant,must complete this Section) 1 APRICANTtR AGENT'S NAME 1!1 (('tQ yin e3[ .ill YV 1//ertf (Ibert one n t only-to wooer on License) Lest NaShis First Name Middle 2 `.GOO RPORATIION OR PARTNERSHIP NAME Enter exact name as It appears on Articles of Inc or Partnership Agreement 397 BUSINftNAME. 1l C- i tna Q {/�(1 Enter exact name as It appo.A on the exterior of premlees 44 4 BUSIpI'ESS ADDRESS 7)Q 3 S. rI1 T e2 1 0 I Hop R.f s-C-T .e)O Do not use P O Box Number /p 5 BUSINESS PHONE NO, �9�aa-9St...1 RESIDENCE PHONE NO.• q -/SW 0 B CITY C "'�T t/^�p , COUNTY [� �i ZIP CODE. rTe.Z1a�t 7 MAILING ADDRESSVyy- /p-3 rnCRIn1sN CITY (2.jt e1-5 J STATE Q� 2IP CODE: x�e:Iof.C; 8 IS THE BUSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OF THE ABOVE CITY OR TOWN. .q YESUt' ❑ NO SECTION 4(a) INDICATE LICENSE SERIES• Check only one,use separate form for each license �\ NEW LICENSE FEES Total Due if Filed I Total Due if Filed Person to Perm / �' °cation SERIES Nov 1 May 15 I May 16 Oct 31 ' Transfer F. ARhuel Renewal Transfer Fee 0111141 0 1 DISTILLERS LICENSE IN STATE) 1950.00 : 1 775.00 350.00 ❑ 2 BREWERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1,950.00 I 1 775.00 350.00 ❑ 3 VINTNERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1,750.00 I 1,675.00 150.00 ❑ 4 WHOLESALER ALL LIQUORS 1850.00 I 1 725.00 250.00 ❑ 5 WHOLESALER WINE AND BEER 1 700.00 I 1.650.00 100.00 A 6 ON-SALE RETAILER,ALL LIQUORS 1 750.00 I 1,67500 400.0 150.00 200.00 ❑ 7 ON.SALE RETAILER,WINE AND BEER 475.00 I 437 50',1 75.00 O 8 ON-SALE RETAILER BEER 325.00 312.50 25.00 • ❑ 9 OFF-SALE RETAILER ALL LIQUORS 1 650.00 1,625.00 y400.00 50.00 200.00 ❑ 10 OFF-SALE RETAILER WINE AND BEER 450.00 I 425.00 50.00 ❑ 11 OFF-SALE RETAILER BEER 325.00 312 50 25.00 ❑ 12 RAILROAD TRAIN LICENSE 1825.00 1 712.50 225.00 O 13 AIRLINE LICENSE 1825.00 I 1 712 50 225.00 ❑ 14 'PRIVATE CLUB LICENSE 1250.00 I 117500 • 150.00 O 15 HOTEL/MOTEL LICENSE Complete Section 6 2 100.00 1,850.00 500.00 ❑ 16 RESTAURANT LICENSE Complete Sacnon 6 2100.00 I 1850.00 • 500.00 • ❑ 21 GOVERNMENT LICENSE 300.00 I 250.00 • 100.00 • ❑ CORPORATION AGENT CHANGE-$100.00 I •Not Permitted 1 SECTION 4161 BONDING \\`\ ck ____--.---- 1 NAME OF BONDING COMPANY- n AMOUNT S2 EFFECTIVE DATE OF BOND111l1 DLLC USE ONLY Ply# FEES -WC-. LIC FE AC1'CHG MFG- CLUB TOTAL s--z !ACTION t1 OUCSTIUNS FOR ALL APPLICANTS I Property Parcel Number '01 0? -d e CC)-1 2 Legal Description of Licensed Property SC cc )9 !Ld ry- :)t P.0 7 a,�r(?s 1 R >�f -� -- 3 Distance to the nearest school YyYj� Name/address of school s "�"""`�,L-xZ�. 4 Are you the..XOWNEFI ❑LESSEE ❑SUBLESSEE LIPURCHASER of the(premises 6. II the premises is leased give name and address of lessor' Name Address City State ��/// Zip 6 Has a license or transfer of license for the premises represented herein been denied by the Stem within the pest sixty months OYES at O If yes,attach en explanation s• 7 Does any alcoholic beverage manufacturer wholesaler or employee thereof have any Interest In your business LIVES ANO 8 lathe premises licensed with a license other then the one for which you are applying AYES�7 ONO If so givelicense No O/ 1// �J Licensee(exactly as It appears on License) ^1+Id t'/�C 1st)t 4_ 1{ ek 1 L 1- c c b {{{��. Last Name / First Nems Mlo� vl9 What Is your Arizona Stem Sales Tex(Privilege)License No f f -Q I 76 0. Q 1� Do you understand that a portion of the fees,such es Application Fee(5100.001 and interim Permit Fee(If applicable)Is not refundable AYES C r SECTION 6 FOR SERIES 15 OR 16 APPLICANTS 1 la there a velid Series 16 or 16 license currently Issued at the proposed location.OYES 000 If so enter licensee's name exactly self appears on licen License No / / / / I / / Last Name First Name Middle NOTE If the answer to question 1 above is 'yes ,you may qualify for en Interim Permit to operate while your application is pending consult Section 4-203.01 A R S complete a form 176 attach appropriate fee attach me current license and submit with this eoollcetion 2 What percentage of your gross sales reoresents the purchase of 'food" 3 How much of your floor space Is designed for restaurant dining(sq ft) Seating capacity for dining purposes 4 Hays you attached a copy of your menu that Includes prices. DYES LINO (It not explain) SECTION 7 INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP OWNERS. -n1 I 1 Answsr the following questions (If appllcente are married answer each question for both husband end wifg7s P r"s •U Percentage Owned Generel'Llmltedl Last Name First Name Middle; by each Residence Addif is r- City State Zir rpurse ❑ ❑ 1114'0)4%41 'V �Y�NL .&//r,-v• (t( 0 e BYO S/ t .n�.v cysn4yC a Applicant(enter here end in section 3) -� y ❑ 0 Partner Partner ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Partner Attach additional sheet if necessary EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND AN APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD 2 Is each person listed ebove a bone fide resident of Arizona: [RYES ONO 3 Is any person,other then the above going to share In the profits/losses of the business: OYES 1�N0 SECTION 8 CORPORATION OR CLUB APPLICANTS. /r EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND SUBMIT AN APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD 1 Name of corporation or club (Enter exactly as It appears on Articles of Inc or Club Charter) 2 Date Incorporated or chartered State where incprporated: 3 Arizona Corporation Commission Filo No Date authorized to'do business In Arizona. 4 le corporation or club nonprofit (l V ES ONO If so,give I R.S tax exempt Na FIN 5 If a club refer to Section 4 101 4 A A.S. and enter the eubparagreph under which you are applying 6 List officers and directors. Last Neme First Nnme Middle Title Residence Address City,State. Attach additional sheet if necessary 7 List stockholders owning 10%or more. Lest Name F'rst News Middle Percentage Owned 1 Residence Address Ciry,Stem,Z if th s Coro is owned by another corp. etch en ownarelrip officer/director d,sel0wre for the',lent corporation Attach sadibonsa stwet ie resew 1 1 cure now10/ —D L L C USE ONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WEST JFFFERSON SLITE 227 PHOENIX AZ 85007 602/i.55 5141 QUESTIONNAIRE _ CO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER, PARTNER STOCKHOLDER (10', OReiN ,TORE) AND MANAGER ALSO EACH PERSON COMPLETING PHIS FORM ��\ MUST SUBMIT AN 'APPLICANT"TtPE FINGERPRINT GAND %VHIC I `IA5 BE 3BTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENC\ C—; } READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT �� L _ I Name. rn'e 441.4 fir,6,yV IV` E//e N Date of both ti -. el 4 /Last First Middle Month nay year 2 Business Name j C6-Jr1^ g P' ` � ^ •Ke of both (...d:,.. As it appears in section 3 of Form 120) City State 3 Business address 7 8 3 •,. Q'R S al.-IN s s)- 412,644- — /' " l 100 not use P O Ban number) Q ��y. CZitsp3- y County Z, Code ('f(� � / t l ` 0 n n �s 4 Drivers license No 2— 3 C'� •seignt � D Weight 1.] Eye color 1]X• Hair color ad //.2� State a Name of spouse 1 )n'n �(y,r Ca s....�.0 _ Dare of birth 1/—L. �e :I�st a die Last maiden rAr 6 Of wha te are volke.bona fide resident j'a.J\w3 r' It Arizona date of residency )9 7 L, 7 Indic ta your emplgyment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state v Time j Describe Positron Employers Nano or Name of Business �' Employed ; or Business ,Give Street Address City State and Zip Code) rzj A 1 DATES I U' ''M.A 6•15 �S'.c;h !Present Pvslii nor business engaged �'C 19 By I y.r-QJiaa. � V J � � ,,n 310 I o rse•t.,T ;1,,±',..f I fIr-i ,1 — — 8 5110 B c....1 e7�e 7 DAT et ES �,ne,..it V-+.cis✓ perry—e.. f�^-od"'e`' ivy !position nerd or business engaged in /� ....tit r. ' y� /�7. 1 4YZ M� ). ;31 P j limmediateiP preceding above(Al j I I8I r l r ` ' • ,Posirion held or business engaged in �'.f" p y a11ev w i a2 4 (J 'immediately preceding above IBI 0-7-4- I !5.9 1. e].2. 4) Attach additional sheet it necessary A Indicate where you have resided for the last five years I ;FROM TO I RESIDENCE• Month Year Month Year Street City State Zip Code ii >,T 197talf-i 19_80 ,„ZaT/ u • / F asaav 7- 1ag0 4.f- - I28 '�yes S . .0 4r I •Attach addition*sheet if necessary 3 How many noun per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto v.- L e f 0 Give Telephone Numbers for 1 D.� n ——f r ,i A Y—//a)2 0 Business Residence 1 Have you ever been detained Cited arrested indicted or summoned into court tar violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor viotahom DYES LT'NO r 2 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been f nee) imprisoned had sentence suspended or placed on probation for violation of any law nr ordinance n(„ OYES O 3 Hove you ever had a business pratetsiOnel or liquor license witted denied revoked suspended or tined in this or VW other slate OYES N O 4 Nave you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license relented or denied- OYES NO 'S Has anyone ever Fled suit or obtained a lodgment against YOu in any civil action the subject of which involved fraud or misrepresentation of a liquor related matter DYES a IB 11 any answer 10 Uualhuns U through YE S el WO a signed stelatiunl giving complete details 17 Are you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws anti Regulations DYES ON( 18 Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales IPrivdegel Tax Account and your city permit fees Iif applicable)current AYES ON( • 19 Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of any Proposed change of business name prior to making any such cnanges £YES f Nr 20 Do you agree to post the permit or license if issued in a conspicious place on the premises and within view of the general our nc )YES 21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine and beer supplies only from licensed Arizona wholesalers /YES ...,. f 22 Do you agree to keep all records invoices and other documents relating to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages fOr a period of two years and to have them easily accessible for examination YES 23 DO you consent for the duration of the permit Or license it issued to the entrance invcieclion and search by any tow enrr r,ernenr, o!trcwl without a warrant or other process of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of () — the State Liquor Laws.Regulations and Board Directives YES 24 DO you consent to an investigation or your background including all records of every k no and ctesc lotion including'.nhce reCi.its and to waive any fights or causes of action that you may have against the A./On i Denarrmfnl 01 I i iti0,Licenses anti Control ani' any other indlvldual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of LvWor Licenses and Control YES .- 25 If sny answer to Questions 17 through 24 is NO attach a snored statement awing the reasons 1.3.each ans.'.e+s FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECLTIO\ AND T E DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT ST AT t•/� , D i r ss COUNTY OF I I U W I J r A., g frl t ay1 yin efa-M HEiNrt FIRST DU..y SF/ORN UPON OH TH HER Er Printed mine of auuli'am DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PER IURY TH,T I AM THE,.PP.it_ I tAh IN( AS FOFe i.,l C iESTiOF.N A IkD THAT F D QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL StATEMENT0 LONT MNED TH=.-.E 4 iE TRUE2181FIRECT AND COMPLETE O t' er �O e� S� /--.�.t C —/Jtivt.-j -- ---- 4 ..v. SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO heroic me this / • t ties- . r "-Y `ay ernnar stet s - l(c/t l t ,iA h1ARIHA Link A • '1 - tI NOGey vue I S or Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC r/ Mellt i,t1PA 4:0 y My Commission e,gC.eApi4. _. +.T ellillit • a a SECTION 9 PERSON TO PERSON TRANSFER ,CI STIONS TO BE COMPLETE[�{Q��))CLR�R�ENRT LICENSEE: ($/eriasa&9 only) �, o .eat licensee 1 c.I((�Ctrchv er I\l iWir- `--- Entity �!'�"", Exactly ae It appears on license Last Name First Name Middle Etel,Agt,etc • 2 Corporate name: If current licenseappears on license 3 Current business name )' t, 0,,„ ,a I' ^ ^�p Exactly as It weans on license 4 Current business address' !/] 3 S Tv...`t'e-t Q, A V1) County' 1_ �' Exactly as It appears on license ��.c�"�� City' �� r �•r.T- ( Y ]1.2 0 ZIP Code 5220 5 License Series: � I License Number.Q//L/A/t�I_//aI42 Date of last renewal Il al i—V/ 6 Hen you complied with the Uniform Commercial Code concerning bulk sale transfers i YES ONO If not attach an explanation , ' .<I 7 Have all creditors,lien holders Interest holders etc bean notified al this transfer YES ONO B Does the applicant Intend to operate the business while this application is pending KYES UNO If s0 complete Form 176 attach appropriate I attach current license and submit with this application(for Series 6 9 15 or 16 unly) 9 To be completed by the CURRENT LICENSEE I HEREBY HELINQUISH MY RIGHTS TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LICENSE TO THE APPLICANT NAMED HEREIN AN9MEREBY OEPO. AND SAY THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS SECTION ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE ..JJ `10. Current mailing address other than business f1 e. l -86 Sipnetur �ant licensee Date signed STATE OF '' IS RIBED AN(7 BRhC19SM me this day Of 6 ,1155 E NIEVES (,� _ , i SUZANNENOM PV6If0—StaM gl Adtan3 MAPTY signsreo OC ' C9fiTfrE `fis°5'u lira SECTION 10 LOCATION TO LOCATION TRANSFER QUESTIONS (Series 6&9 only) APPLICANTS CANNO PERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT IS FINALLY APPROVED BY THE STATE 1 Current business cadres.' ; S • m C ICt 01 n N County �,_.,,r�L tly as It appears on license `, City a'r[n.rir 9,.., Z e ?5-�-0 2 Current business name 1 �`y C, z� 1 _�� canny as It appears on Jinn ��'i 3 New business address County Also enter in Section 3 Do not use P O Box bar City ZIP Code 4. New business tame �� Al enter In fies4on 3 5 Curses Seri License Number / / / / / / / Date of last renewal 6 Heat date doZYou plan to move Uate of planned opening -] v FEE x$100.(Refer to Section 4-209.H AF SECTIOO 11 APPOINTMENT OF NEW AGENT FOR CORPORATION OR CLUB LICENSE. for multiple agent change fees) 1 Current Agent's name VExactl4st)t appears on license Last Name First Name Middle NJ 2 Now Ayastt's name Also Fraar In Section 3 Last Name First Name Middle 3 License Series. License number / / / / / / / Den of last renewal 4 Does this transaction Involve the sale of any portion of the corporate stock. OYES ONO If so Complete Section a 5 To be completed by a CORPORATE OFFICER ell I, HEREBY CONSENT TO THE AGENT APPOINTME Printed Name of Corporate Officer NAMED HEREIN AND AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY ASSIGN A NEW AGENT IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH RESIGNATION OR DISCHAR OF THIS AGENT I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE BACKGROUND REPORT SHOWS THAT I THE CORPORATION.OR ANY OFFIC DIRECTOR OR STOCKHOLDER HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION IN T PAST YEAR I WILL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER THE LICENSE TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTI: AND HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO APPEAL SUCH ACTION Signature of corporate/club officer STATE OF COUNTY OF SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of 19 Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires on SECTION 12 PROBATE OR WILL ASSIGNMENT OF AN EXISTING LICENSE (Does not apply to corporations): 1 Current licensee's name Exactly as It appears on license Last Name First Name Middle 2 Anlgnee's name: Also enter In Suction 3 Last Name First Name Middle • • 3 License Series License number / / / / / / / Date of Ian renewal 4. Attach a certified copy of the will or probate distribution instrument that specifically distributes the liquor license to the assignee SECTION 13 GOVERNMENT LICENSE (for cities,towns or counties only) 1 Person to administer this license Also enter in Section 3 Lest Name First Name Middle 2 Applicant' Attach respective governing body's authorization. Name of City Town or County 3 Have you answered ALL questions In Section 3 Including the location to be licensed LIVES l'NO 4 Do you understand that you can only serve alcoholic b gee for consumption on the licensed premises OYES CND 6 Wlll a concessionaire be using this license OYES ENO If to attach the agreement end appropriate authorizations required by Section 4-20t00,A,R 6 Do you understand a separate license must be obtained for each premises from which alcoholic bevereges are to be carved DYES tap e etS eN SECTION 14 DIAGRAM OF PREMISES (Diagram most be on this form bluapnnlf not accaptadl 1 SHOW ONLY THE AREA TO BE COVERED BY THIS LICENSE INCLUDE ALL ENTRANCES/EXITS DRIVE IN WINDOWS SERVICE WINDOWS LIQUOR STORAGE AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OR SQUARE FOOTAGE FIGURES DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS LIVING QUARTERS,ETC SERIES 16 AND SERIES 16 APPLICANTS MUST EXPLICITLY DEPICT KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND DINING FACILITIES t, ra. . .. 17. '3J A4 e 4A 62 4/* • ,PAc6e 7"c7`- 'z "S-.> a5- • ON 0 I ' - / f/ /3 7 f /'/e c✓ � T' Rol�>s I s"'pop- 10 r I Zs a • . I / • tL ( r , OR TRANSFEROR (4) THAT NO OTHER PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREIN HAS AN INTEREST THE SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WHICH THESE STATEMENTS ARE MADE (5)AND THAT NONE OF THE OWNERS PARTNEr OFFICERS DIRECTORS OR STOCKHOLDERS LISTED HEREIN HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS t A LIQUOR VIOLATION IN THE PAST YEAR nature � t/ `J(I s SUBSCRIBED IN MY PESEE.AteoaWQRi1'ID b O tee his ^/7/k\/ t1gy.� ( •( �,1 ,/)// la R N)r . t 0ffIrthl UAL "RI"u'' ,IAMI_t1vn 1 1 T_ 1YYL,.. / IOi AP1 Put, .,,Il' pignut re /NOTARY PUttl My CommHfionWknit)wiilati19 i^"a ._ ,,.ot. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES \ \VI ITEM # _ MEETING OF 4/////(9 /0/tj MOTION BY: SECONDED BY; YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR FTnSON COUNCILMAN. BALJO COUNCILMAN TAYLOR MaCILMAN HTI1 COUNCILMAN SHANKS 1 MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL + oft. Amor ITEM NO. 19 I MOVE THAT THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY MS JANE ELLEN MERRYMAN, AGENT FOR KC BAR BQ, FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, BE RECONSIDERED AND RECOMMENDED TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL FOR (APPROVAL/DENIAL) . 43)ACHF de/Ckk } ti ice- ./0431 i , ,j5 ; C.4 4%., y..)k „'' - , z .z91L I� CO'ily at C 4ac ie c&unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 15, 1985 MEMORANDUM��. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER XIMICHAEL FROM: 1 \ CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING PREPARED BY, ; JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ----,'N SUBJECT:'-- ADDENDUM TO AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 PZ-3-82 (SIERRA ENTRADA) The Development Coordinating Committee met on April 11, 1985. While the proposed plan appeared to be congested-looking, it was felt that ook the interior layout for storage should be left up to the Association. Recommended stipulations are as follows: 1. That a sliding gate rather than a swing-out gate be provided to allow for more maneuvering area. 2. That a five foot (5' ) setback along Lucy Court for the perimeter wall be provided. 3. That a six foot (6 ' ) masonry perimeter wall be installed around the site. A temporary chain link fence shall be installed along the east lot line of Tract D until such time Rock Shadows installs a block wall around their park. 4. That perimeter landscaping with desert vegetation be provided Any irrigation shall be drip irrigation. 5. That the site be surfaced with four inches (4") of gravel or dust-proof surfacing as may be required by the Building Official . )O1 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 Honorable Mayor and City Council Addendum to Agenda Item - April 16, 1985 PZ-3-82 (Sierra Entrada) 00' Page Two of Two 6. That the Sierra Entrada Board of Directors or the general membership of the Homeowner' s Association of Sierra Entrada vote in favor of requesting Tract D to be used for boat and RV storage. A signed statement to that effect by its Board of Directors shall be submitted. 7. That one (1) block be omitted every ten feet (10' ) at the base of the wall to allow for the passage of drainage. 8. Opaque gates will be required. 9. Walkways across drainage easements are permitted. The Council may stipulate that the final development plan be approved by the DCC before development is permitted on that lot. CRN :JAN:mas p p.QACHE✓G ..4 l, ;' : ` z p iiyo izoNP �� ache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 9, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: -`MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: \\ JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECi`:-�" AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 PZ-3-82 - SIERRA ENTRADA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT Project Description This is a Planned Development amendment request by the Sierra Entrada Homeowners to allow boat and recreational vehicle storage on Tract D of the subdivision. Tract D is an irregularly-shaped 26,400 square foot parcel on the north end of Lucy Court. The original PD for Sierra Entrada was approved by the City Council on August 17, 1982 to CR-3/PD. Planning Department Comments An area for boat and trailer storage is a facility that is common with newer subdivisions in the Salt River Valley. Because of the shape of Tract D, however, it is doubtful that 25 RVs as proposed can be stored there. The need for backup and maneuvering areas would limit the number to about 10 and possibly 15 if the spaces could be designed properly. The homes on Lucy Court will be setback 20 feet. There should be at least a 5 foot setback for the perimeter masonry wall to allow for some landscaping and to not visually impact the future homes on the street. The homeowners strongly believe that they have submitted a workable plan with 25 stall spaces of 15 feet by 40 feet. It would be the recommendation of staff to have this item continued so that a revised plan can be submitted that provides for more maneuvering area . Approver for Agend/Daa to Item # First Reading /_d-h5— Second Reading _ Public Hearing Cld Business 1.ew Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 Honorable Mayor and City Council Agenda Item - April 16, 1985 PZ-3-82 - Sierra Entrada PD Amendment Page Two of Two Additional stipulations that we would be recommending are as follows: 1. That a sL -ng gate rather than a swing-out gate be provided to allow for more maneuvering area. 2. That a locked gate be installed at the southeast corner of the property. 3. That a 6 foot masonry perimeter wall be installed around the site. A temporary "ain-link fence may be installed along the east lot line of Tract D until such time Rock Shadows installs a block wall around their park. 4. That perimeter landscaping with desert vegetation be : 'ovided. 5. That the site be surfaced with four inches of gravel or better surfacing as may be required by the Building Official . 6. That the Sierra Entrada Board of Directors or the general membership of the Homeowners Association of Sierra Entrada vote in favor of requesting Tract D to be used for boa: and recreational vehicle storage. A signed statement to that effect by its president shall be submitted. JAN:mas .ems ) s r-e Tat Forri 1 RECEI ED APR 51985 %EPT OF PLANNING >Ha.".cEe.t Aft`"`�' A I DEVELOPMENT Er 3 ;.g 4)7itl. . _ 3 C-7- ,L/ 9 etrt 11 I MOM R (- o in 4 1R ff vEL TRa •1LEe Ira •r0._1?R � VS_ o�+._T.s S -f}_LL - TRR(L4RS. \HyDQ+r(j' �S_rHL4S ROE W_rpk -Laer 0EFp. .I _EAT_Ede_1 o z ro_ _c EC M r' a a c.k s lg _ELLS it _ R_Ft E lArr ye 4, _ BE /G' it/ , SY-EFL ) fr%e-t) G o frie h 's C.1)-(2C. e s-s Ir , /.., __ ... .........r.7„ g. _ 101 . 28 101-Ie, • 30 as 1 1 ta:• i a•• 11 u-, 17 4 NE 1 1 pI 1 2v'/. yi ! • O; 1 4O '', r�.,Aik ay O \' �131112 11 II r1 Of 5w 14 O Sierra Entra 14 ' 6 3. si 'e 15.0.. .- c, ID O a I 7 Q e Ece, / r e 0 i 1 Garden Homes O o t, 1 C C 16 Z 1 $ ( Unit 1&2 AV E a N j , 1 ' as I I 1 ss re' ,, 60' '' 50 51 152 1 53) ee O`i 57 65•g pi b4 - pm-- p2 54 6� 9"" -- I v BG 1 63 . 62 • 61 CO 10 59 Ri i/ 1 w o 0 i • rr 2 0 ,� - r a0 -D TR D` g O e , TR A gg�'\. `, + s 139 *- 1 a. v 12u ti' CD Q © 129 _ N L. r++i128 O 13 0 130 v 12 _� C7 =.° 127 131, CDW 131 ,„. 126 132 $ 0 5( l r 200 ® 13� 125 a 133 „ FEE TR.8` / 'f ® 0 \_/ 133 e VITA 124 U 1 p34' 34 SCALE 1". 120' .• ® 4 0 123 J 1�135 RECEp ED ®' (t I20 I� - s iy q i3)6 119 .,12t1 . 121 w 12? se 13ti MAY 31984 • •I,•15 e.E ,., DEPT OF PLANNING 0 AND DEVELOPMENT K 102-08 r._s...)y l 4 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET MOTES ve oiorpi/v ITEP1 # r MEETING OF 1.0 6 0/S7 MOTION BY: vl.`) SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC ILMAN BALJO COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR ( irt VICE MAYOR EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR I, OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL1 ITEM NO. 20 I MOVE THAT THE REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY SIERRA ENTRADA HOMEOWNERS BE (APPROVED/DENIED) . Auk Auk (4CHE4 Cam• U III, z _ r (D it y a Apache @unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 3, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM. �' , JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - APRIL 16, 1985 RESIGNATION AND APPOINTMENT FOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Attached please find a letter of resignation from Mr. Dan Tepolt from the Planning and Zoning Commission effective April 15, 1985. An appointment to the Commission to fill this vacancy should be made as soon as possible to allow for a full seven-member Commission due to several upcoming important matters. Recommended Motion I MOVE that the resignation of Mr. Tepolt from the Planning and Zoning Commission be accepted with regret and gratitude; AND THAT be appointed to fill the term left vacant by this resignation, said term to expire June 30, 1985. JAN.mas Approver for Agenda ee. Date Item # First Reading 11//6-W Srcond Reading _ Punic Hearing Cid business New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 0Na C0ily o C pacde ��it-,-:,;,;(ion TALENT BANK APPLI CA ION rim. FOR Q7)„o.twYv,' cJ & -2-67nAM BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE. DATE: F:—- �-r R Lk NA_E: 0`d5 \-\ l._. \ -,\\() t TELEPHONE. ' \$A —1-�15 (home) 9 ' 'A- ' \ (off c ADDRESS: I SC .SPl up tD S5 ZIP CODE: ' .c-At� O OCCUPATION: 43t.. (if retired, please indicate former occ ation profession) EDUCATION: _ N,orn `n0.M^Q91 /",p2.-14, q-, i '_ t- t-N 52SW`c,i,\l1Qlr`Vjt , PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: 1VIN ,-?f ��,. (-- 0;.--1.) ;-.--s'V cc c\ , Kf,\*-%.9,___...a.u* a ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. ,,; \:-\ 4 ai)/I\ 'Revised 6/19/31 Si_; :Itur,IAL Applicant. J 1C01 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHE✓o Z RECEIVED �R�zoNP corty o� , 4pache unctaon APR 2 1985 TALENT BANK A P P L I C A TDP� PLANNING A D- 'cLOAPNI NT FOR PL4Q,.111/44 & dr ZclNiA✓(r BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: y/2/Ps NAME: �6 t 357a,167 TELEPHONE• ga- '9io7 (home) (office) ADDRESS: '15 "7v w, §d.k o ZIP CODE: ier2-2.4) OCCUPATION : SELF Q y t I i .,c1 rev crO t,vpf?i 2 rurt I,.(-Ss. (if retired, pleas indicate former-'occupation or profession) EDUCATION: G 2A•o, C .i 2 ewt L ( tr:Prr6W.0 w c 4 5. U. (am. ems) PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: p ,,, eyc Awn, /2.0.04err 134 (Nes3 !N 4, F02 tel Ave ,p FIi .T. /..tiAl7eara rote-- 0 e)ar, , PaRA'.tAr z I.,' ®ti$'2 t r4•c. M-f2 5 tN 9-T72 tCzr7YZ /4'r ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: 4,,'3: $-LG 6t, Sc 4 ovL 1t NI TC I" 7h-7-R C I�+ou-Sz-t2c,4c. Ain-3 472 t2u..+.4 C)L4_41-667 NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission, or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the City for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and City Council . n ture of Applicant Revised 6/19/81 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 f� t.,61441,4 -11411-1-7-:cr---‘ • —eta elk(' 9 2 - �- nra z a - — fi REC„.IVED _ APR 31985-- - - - DEPT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Mar Lki -, _ - , 6, ROLL CALL/VOTE OTE SH NOTES - ti, ` c' 4 ` gj \ f 07 ? °T ITEM #9 - MEETING OF /1/4 MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: ' f/ YES NO ABSTAINED NED jiVICE MAYOR FTPSON COUNCILMAN. BALJO - V ,COUNCILMAN TAYLOR _ COUNCILMAN HT_I L COUNCILMAN SHANKS *WM ,_ i _MAYOR CLARKE , UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 21 I MOVE THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MR. DAN TEPOLT FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET; AND THAT BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING CO ISSION TO TH: VACANCY CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF MR. TEPOLT, SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. (---- "look PQACHE ✓ it G ; li Z gR�ZoNP Dili o� uc,�ie r2unction April 10, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK 4' SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE REVIEW COMMITTEE At the March 19th Council meeting, appointments were made to the RV Review Committee previously established by the Council . At that time, Councilman Taylor indicated that additional talent bank applications would be forth coming. The motion approved at that time indicated that additional appointments would be made upon receipt of these applications. Attached are talent bank applications submitted by Mr. Thomas Ringhofer as manager of Road Haven Park and Mr. James Hurst as manager of Baywood Mobile Home Park. Both of these applicants will be contacted and asked to attend the Monday night work session. kmc Approver for Agenda kJe.._ Date. Item # First Rcsding 9//u'./��/ -# - Second r;:ading Puc1'c 1-leering Cid Business ✓ New Business Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 r P4p,CN6 ..b '419iz0 .1> 5'.it y on C .pale �, aL,.,,„2, TALENT BANK APPLICATIO ,I eN FOR Ordinance Review Committee BOARD/COMP•MISSION/COMMITTEE DATE. March 20 , 1985 NA'�. Thomas R. Ringhofer TELEPHONE: 839-7654 (home) 982-4811 (offic £ci Eate1000 S. Idaho Rd, Apache Jct ZIP CODE: • 85220 OCCJPATION. P.U.O. R.V. Park Manager (if retired, please indicate forcer occupation or profession) EDUCATION: Bach. of Science in Bus. Admin. , Certificate of Organizational Mgt. , Univ of Colorado PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Az State RE Broker; Grace Community Church; Chamber of Commerce; American Wheelchair Pilots Assn. ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: Leo Frazier NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from state and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Co^nissions, If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must residc within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 . iys at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. /:-/;< Revised 6/19/S1 Si;, • ::are or applicant /- 1C01 NC2TH 1)AnO PCAn • ap.ruc ^,•tr"+.n.r •,r,r.„i, ,s,^^ •' - -- - - vzHE \ ?.Z771:l '4'1 Z0 /?' (V it 0 C4paci2e ( -211;,,, ;„#ZOn TALENT BANK APPLICATIO ;1 BOARD/COMMISSION/COi,MITT DATE: . - 3- / S N .�. J, r1E', Ai t/I P. St TELEPHONE: , ..?-3 z (z (home) /06...5 4 . Ail yk2 - jz yz— (of fic ADDRESS. � c' A 6= , 7 ZIP CODE. . 70SZ Z k OCCUPATION: /Jjn-L- . ig,- Y �� 'd /�ja�i.L� /-�'.r' )t (ie retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: /2--,74.. — j Lh , Jae. (0 b.�flf c' PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO:0:UNITY ACTIVITIES. .1 i))A 5 C N 0"` ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFOR:LATION/REFERENCES: rp0-- ,j ,t S i c N7.7 I-)PIN N i rk '' , GS A',7. NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. s Revised 6/19/S1 ��~\ 'iture of Applicant IC01 NC2T4 tnAkO?r5An . .)nr—.,c -- - ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES \),())11/� /� op, P . ITEf1 # MEETING OF 10 4P MOTION BY: GO SECONDED BY: i YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ akfitik COUNCILMAN BM in VICE MAYOR EIDSON 1/ COUNCILMAN TAYLOR V COUNCILMAN EI L L 1 _MAYOR CLARKE I UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL C- ITEM NO. 22 I MOVE THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS BE APPOINTED TO THE RECREATION VEHICLE REVIEW COMMITTEE: C ry i4AJLJ'� ,. MANAGER , MANAGER PQACHF ✓G O4 y in.t i/'l U ' f Z AlPtzoNP 55it y o pr:the unction Date of Bid Opening: April 3, 1985 ..... Bid Project Number: CM-85-2 Title of Bid: Auditing Services Company Name and Address Cost Richard C. Denen, CPA 401 E. Indian School , Phoenix 6,000.00 Henry & Horne, CPA 2135 E. University, Mesa 7,300.00 Eide Helmeke & Co. , CPA 4143 N. 12th St., Phoenix 8,100.00 Alexander & Devoley, P.C. , CPA 7024 E. Osborn Rd. , Scottsdale 5,500.00 .., Cays & Walker, CPA 777 W. Southern Ave. , Suite 201 , Mesa 7,450.00 Nelson, Weatherly, Lambson & Olvis, CPA 77 W. University Dr. , Mesa 7,320.00 6 '/2-e/le--6-Kathleen Connelly J City Clerk WITNESS: >s-A-- ,- /7' ii-i(t c L., Keith Lewis Lori V. Clark Controller Deputy City Clerk 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 • ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ))1 o\y- ITEf # ;2 MEETING OF 00 MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : )11-6)17)1A-i YES NO ABSTAINED CfUNCILVIILL . COHNC Il NAN- TAYLOR _LUDIC I LMAN SHANKS 1 __VIf.F MAYOR EIDSON `/ _COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR CLARKE �_. 1 UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR I OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL C7"- ITEM NO. 23 I OVE THAT THE BID FOR AUDITING SERVICES BE AWARDED TO � L , IN THE AMOUNT OF rSStO.Cry PeACHF✓G CP „,„Jil5' . r1,(2., o ' y. , Z r riPizoN'' it o i ache unctaon `...` April 11 , 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: C, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSULTING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER As part of my continuing evaluation of the City's operations and organization, I have been considering for some time the need for a full time Engineering position. I have come to the conclusion that we would be better served by contracting for the Engineering Services that we need, and augmenting the City's technical staff to do the day to day work of inspecting, traffic counts, and studies, etc. I am bringing this to you at this time because we are getting into the budget for next year and it will take some time to advertise and negotiate for this service and by starting now, we will be in a position to have a contract in place as soon as possible. MJMc/lvc Approver for Agenda JD/ate Item #, First Reading Y/O!i/ V Second Reiding Pu bItc Hea ing - t d 3uctr:'ess ✓New E3tssiness - Consent Agenda 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES , \pj? 3)? A01•14, pet/ ITEM #, MEETING OF 1_04°MOTION BY: ka SECONDED BY: �!��'L Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN HILL CO UN!C I LMAN! SHANKS t� VICE MAYOR FIDSON 4COUNCILMAN BALJO I _MAYOR_ CLARKF UNANI".OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ' • `�_ t!mra.- ITEM NO. 24 I MOVE THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH THE STEPS NECESSARY TO SOLICIT AND CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • ITEM # , P MEETING OF /i4J2-Z MOTION BY: n SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO 1 cOUmCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN TAYLOR • U TA1'/brYA14O VICE MAYOR EIDSON I—MAYOR CLARKE UNANITOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 25 I MOVE THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MAY 6, 1985, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MAY 7, 1985, AT 6:00 P.M. , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. yP.CHE✓G O� U ;Ii!! . ;~ Z �RIZoNP o � ac1 e c2unclion DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 10, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: JIM NAKAGAWA, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJEC . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find a copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes from their regular meeting of March 26, 1985. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk' s office. JAN:mas 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 �s PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA MARCH 26, 1985 7 00 P M MINUTES Present Absent Guests Mr Jorgensen None List in Planning Off Mr Heermans Mr. Hoaglin Mr. Taylor Mr. Tepolt Mr Vehon Mr. Sanchez, Chairman Mr Newcomer, Executive Secretary Mr. Nakagawa, Staff Mrs. Samuelson, Recording Secretary Synopsis Agenda dated March 26, 1985 - approved as presented Minutes dated March 6, 1985, March 12, 1985, and March 14, 1985 - approved as presented PZ-33-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 292) - recommended for approval PZ-69-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 342) - recommended for approval PZ-70-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 343) - continued to April 23, 1985. PZ-73-84 (Proposed Ordinance No. 346) - recommended for approval. PZ-74-84 (Proposed Ordinance No 347) - recommended for approval PZ-1-85 (Proposed Ordinance No 349) - recommended for approval . Work session set to discuss additional standards for installation of trailers and mobile homes on TH zoned property and minimum lot size requirements for TH zoning - April 3, 1985, at 7 00 p m in Planning Conference Room. Commission Initiative authorized for PZ-13-85 (Proposed Ordinance No 365). 1. Roll call all members present 2 Vehon/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona that the Agenda dated March 26, 1985, be approved 1"k' as presented " The motion passed unanimously 3 Vehon/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated March 6, 1985 (Special Meeting), March 12, 1985 (Regular Meeting); and March 14, 1985 (Work Session) be approved as presented." The motion passed 6-0-1, with Mr Taylor voting "present" due to absence at one of the meetings Mr. Tepolt said that he was absent at the March 6th meeting. 4. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-33-84, Proposed Ordinance No 292, Sign Code, and asked for staff briefing 5 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission stating that this was the result of work begun last summer by the Rewrite Committee and Mr Nakagawa He showed a video tape of signs in Apache Junction and Scottsda12 and overheads of the provisions of the Code Amokik Page Two - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1985 6. Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor. 7 Michael Turner represented Gannett Outdoor He said they had looked at the proposal and they were in favor with the exception of the use permit clause 8 Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. 9. Michael Turner said he was both in favor and in opposition He opposed the proposal for billboards on undeveloped property only 10 Gil Verley asked about the phrases "if circumstances warrant a larger size," and "greater height " He said these could cause confusion 11. Rusty Roberts represented Outdoor Systems He said they were opposed to limiting outdoor advertising He added that the write-up presented on billboards was agreeable with him He said billboards should be handled on a case-to-case basis 12 Chairman there being no further public comment, asked for Commission discussion 13 Mr Taylor stated that he had been out of town at the time of the last work session He noted that the Rewrite Committee was unanimous when they drafted the Code without these proposed amendments. He suggested that they adopt the Code without such amendments 14. Commission brief discussion. 15 Chairman suggested that another work session may be needed 16. Mr. Taylor said that a point had been reached to do something. 17 Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that case PZ-33-84, Proposed Ordinance No 292, the 'Sign Code of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,' is recommended to the Apache Junction City Council for approval without any amendments /I1 The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. The adoption of this Code will help to realize the General Plan's goals to upgrade the community's visual image, promote a low-profile growth form, and protect the natural setting. 2 The economic well-being of the community will be enhanced by effective sign controls 3 The Sign Code as is being submitted is a year's work of a citizens' committee (the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Committee) which represents a cross-section of the City of Apache Junction, and it was unanimously recommended by this Committee to be forwarded to the City Council in it's present form without amendments." The motion passed 5-2-0, with Mr Vehon and Mr Sanchez dissenting 18. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-69-84, a rezoning from GR to TH in Section 27 and asked for staff briefing 19 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 20 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 41"MP Page Three - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1985 21 Jerry Burgess said the area is mainly mobile homes now. 22 Mr Taylor asked if he would have any objections to there being stipulations added, such as increasing the size from 8,000 square feet to 11,000 square feet for approximately 3 units to a 11 acre parcel 23 Mr Burgess replied that future applications would be okay, but he had applied under the current Zoning Ordinance and what is allowed now. 24 Mr Heermans asked if he would have a problem with deed restrictions, ground-level installation and for 1976 models or later. 25. Mr. Burgess replied that some 1970 models are in better shape that the 76's He said that they should abide by the City Code and the regulations should be amended to require skirting or ground-level for all mobile homes 26 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition 27. James Buckwalter commented that development on this parcel would eliminate open space, cause more traffic and dust, and was opposed to any development unless the road was improved 28 Chairman asked for Planning Department comments and recommendations. 29 Mr Nakagawa stated that staff had no objections and recommended stipulating roadway dedications and that this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City He noted that Section 13 0109 of the Zoning Ordinance allows for the Commission to impose stipulations on a rezoning 30 Chairman asked if the applicant had any rebuttal 31. Mr. Burgess noted that there were no developed roads in the ar/ \ 32 Chairman there being no rebuttal from the opposition, he closed the public hearing. 33 Mr. Taylor recommended that a stipulation be placed on all TH rezonings for 11,000 square foot lots until the Zoning Ordinance is changed 34 Mr Heermans commented that they put deed restrictions to make ground-level or skirting mandatory 35 Mr Newcomer stated that it is very difficult to enforce stipulations between private properties. He commented that if this case is different from f past cases, then it could be done, if not they #i should make the changes by an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance 36. Chairman noted that a later Agenda item would be to set a work session on these items and that the Commission should refrain from setting any precedent by setting requirements '7. Mr. Taylor stated that it is an immediate necessity to reduce the size by one-third and added that the Zoning Ordinance allows them to set requirements 38 Mr Tepolt commented that it is not fair to the applicant to change rules in the middle of a rezoning He added that the applicant should have been given .r Page Four - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1985 notice if the requirements were going to change 39 Tepolt/Hoaglin M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-69-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 342, application of Robert and Barbara Jones and Jerry Burgess for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH I Trailer Homesite Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations or recommendations are• 1 The applicants dedicate the north, south, east, and west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes 2. This parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It is in compliance with the General Plan. 2 It appears to be the highest use of the land at this time " The motion passed 4-3-0, with Mr. Vehon, Mr Jorgensen, and Mr Taylor dissenting 40 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-70-84, a rezoning from GR to TH in Section 21, and asked for staff briefing (Mr Taylor vacated his seat temporarily due to a conflict of interest ) 41 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 42. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 43. Jerry Burgess handed in a letter from an adjacent property ► owner who could not attend the meeting, but who was in favor of the rezoning He pointed out parcels that are currently zoned TH or are in the process of rezoning 44. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor, asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition 45. Mr Taylor commented that he was not opposed to TH zoning, but that steps should be taken to stipulate the number of units on a parcel. 46. Keith Stachar represented the property owner to the south who will be applying to TH zoning soon He commented that he felt 11,000 square foot lots would be an appropriate requirement. He added that he was not speaking in opposition to this case, only offering an opinion 47. Chairman asked for Planning Department comments and recommendations 48 Mr Nakagawa stated that staff had no objections to the rezoning, he recommended roadway dedications and that this parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City flimoMIP Page Five - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1985 49 Mr Burgess rebutted by saying that he would agree in the future for increased size of Tots He asked why they were singling these cases out tonight He said that instead of changing size, they should change to 3 units to 1* acres 50 Chairman closed the public hearing. 51 Commission discussion on continuing this case until a A work session is held to determine several issues / `1 on TH zonings 52 Vehon/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that case PZ-70-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 343, application of Robert and Barbara Jones, Jerry Burgess, Don and Bonnie Puckett, Michelle Sitek, and Susan Salido for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone, that the Commission continue this case until its regular meeting of April 23, 1985, at 7 00 p m., in these City Council Chambers " The motion passed 6-0-1 53 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-73-84, a rezoning from GR to C-4 in Section 28, and asked for staff briefing 54 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 55. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 56 Paul Connolly represented the applicant He said the property is on highway frontage and has CB-2 around it. 57. Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor 58 Jerry Burgess stated that he owns property to the northwest and that the zoning would conform, but that he would like to be protected with a block wall 59. Chairman there being no opposition, asked for Planning Department comments and recommendations 60. Mr. Nakagawa noted that the new commercial districts regulations provide for a block wall when there are residential properties adjoining the parcel being rezoned for commercial uses. He stated that the rezoning would be consistent with the General Plan He added that two protests had been filed, one outside the 150' area, the other representing 5% of the protest area 61. Chairman closed the public hearing 62 Jorgensen/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning L Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-73-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 346, application of Leonard W Hardy through Paul Connolly for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-4 Heavy Commercial District, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application s Page Six - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1985 The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It is in accordance with the General Plan 2. Is appears to be a good use of the property." The motion passed unanimously 63 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-74-84, a rezoning from GR to C-2 in Section 20, and asked for staff briefing. (Mr. Vehon vacated his seat temporarily due to a conflict of interest ) 64. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 65 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 66. Hershel Wilson stated he was in the process of purchasing the property and will eventually build a multi-unit retail building depending on financing 67. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for Planning Department comments and recommendations. 68. Mr. Nakagawa stated staff had no objections and recommended stipulating roadway dedications. 69 Chairman closed the public hearing 70. Tepolt/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-74-84, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 347, application of James and Tom Ella Polk through Hershel Wilson for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Any stipulations are The applicants dedicate the west seventeen feet (17') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes The reasons for this recommendation are 1. It complies with the General Plan. 2 It appears to be the highest and best use of the property at this time " The motion passed 6-0-1. 71. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-1-85, a rezoning from GR to TH in Section 18, and asked for staff briefing on the case 72 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding the case 73. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 74 Jerry Burgess stated that he will take 3 mobiles to 11 acre He said that was all he could get on the property anyway the way it is presently laid out with a mobile home and storage building which is fenced 75. Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for Planning Department comments and recommendations IP"MIP Page Seven - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1985 76 Mr Nakagawa stated that staff had no objections and recommended stipulations of roadway dedication and that no mobile home or recreational vehicle park be developed on this property unless otherwise permitted by the City He added that the Public Works Director is studying any dedication requirements for Concho Street 77 Chairman closed the public hearing 78. Jorgensen/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-1-85, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 349, application of Edward and Ann Slowinski through Jerry Burgess and Robert Jones for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to TH Trailer Homesite Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Any stipulations or recommendations are 1 The applicants dedicate the west thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes 2 -his parcel not be developed into a mobile home or recreational vehicle park unless otherwise permitted by the City 3 That any other stipulation requested by the City departments be complied with. The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It is in compliance with the General Plan 2 It seems to be a good use for the property." The motion passed unanimously. 79 Chairman asked for a discussion of dates for a work session on additional standards for installation of trailers and mobile homes on TH zoned property !� and minimum lot size requirements for TH zoning. 80. Commission discussion and date set for April 3, 1985, at 7 00 p m., in the Planning Department Conference Room. 81. Chairman asked for staff briefing on request for Commission initiative for PZ-13-85. 82. Mr Newcomer stated that the date in the Zoning Ordinance of March 7, 1985 for the aerial photograph is not correct due to the flight not being flown because of adverse weather conditions He said the proposed ordinance would change the date to March 14, 1985 which is the actual date of the flight 83 Vehon/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that staff is directed to advertise PZ-13-85, Proposed Ordinance No 365, for Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing on April 9, 1985, at 7 00 p.m., in these City Council Chambers." The motion passed unanimously 84. Chairman asked if there was anyone to speak under Call to the Public 1P"MIP Page Eight - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 26, 1985 85 Jerry Burgess stated that he would like his rezoning public hearing reopened to allow him the opportunity to agree to stipulations for 11,000 square foot lots He said the delay is a hardship. 86 Chairman said he would let it stand as it was up to him to reopen the public hearing omak 87. Mr. Burgess asked if it was up to him alone to allow a motion to reopen his public hearing 88. Chairman replied that it was up to him to reopen the public hearing He said a work session had already been set to discuss this and that a motion had been made and seconded to continue his public hearing. He asked if there was anything else to be discussed 89 Mr Vehon asked on the progress for setting a date for a General Plan review. 90. Mr Newcomer replied that a list of issues had been prepared for the April 9th meeting. 91 Chairman there being no further business, called for a motion to adjourn. 92 Vehon/Jorgensen M/S to adjourn The meeting adjourned at 9 03 p m. Recorded and transcribed by Marge elson, Recording Secretary Respectfully submitted by.osimk �xL/ James A. Nakagawa, Ac �J Executive Secretary APPROVED. en Sanc ezh , Chairman Planning and Zoning Comm' 'on ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES G ° 111. C ti j [Pr- . MEETING ITEi1 # MEETING OFL' /( MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: Lifit4ei YES NO s ABSTAINED ii VICE MAYOR FTT)SO t ,COUNCILMAN_BALJO J .CO1L.NCILMRN TAYLOR _ J COUNCILMAN H T I L COUNCILMAN SHANKS N _MAYOR CLARKE I , UNANI'^.0 S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL p p 41=77- ITEM NO. 27 I MOVE THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P.M. ROLL CALL i/Ak 41/Yis b 1//u/ks ROLL CALL IP1RESENT I ABSENT A. w / W.S. J ✓ ( MAYOR v aAflKL VICE-MAYOR E VIDSON ! - E / l COUNCILMAN HILL ! / ,V/ COUNCILMAN TAYLOR / / COUNCILMAN SHANKS ' / / COUNCILMAN B_AL,JQ• ' / r f / J 1IANO COUNCILMAN DAr TOTAL ( 7 LP - � STAFF PRESENT iW S. V /0 MICHAEL J. MCNULTY 1/ CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly i/ FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis J/ V V DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Chuck Newcomer V/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel ✓ • v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman V CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch / 0-6717i--- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph i,/// I ,