HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-12-18 BOA MINUTESPRESENT
Mr.Schaffer
Mr.Carter
Mrs.Luddy
Mrs.Blatterspiel
Mr.Gardom,Chairman
Mr.Nakagawa,Acting Executive Secretary
Mr.Class -Erickson,Staff
Ms.Ortberg,Recording Secretary
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD
APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA
DECEMBER 18,1985
7:00 P.M.
ABSENT
SYNOPSIS
Mr.Berry
Agenda dated December 18,1985 approved as submitted
Minutes dated September 9,1985,approved as submitted
Minutes dated December 9,1985,approved as submitted
BA -6-85 approved as submitted
.Roll Call
2.Carter/Blatterspiel
Luddy/Carter
4..Blatterspiel/Schaffer
5.Chairman
6..Mr.Class -Erickson
7.Chairman
8.Zamir Hasan
9.Chairman
10..Class -Erickson
GUESTS
List in Planning
Office
Six members present with one absent as noted
above.
M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment
of the City of Apaches Junction,Arizona,that
the Agenda dated December 18,1985,be approved."
Motion passed 5-0-0.
M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment
of the City of Apache Junction,Arizona,that
the Minutes dated September 9,1985,be approved
as submitted."
Motion passed 4-0-1 with Mrs.Blatterspiel abstain-
ing.
"BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of
the City of Apache Junction,Arizona,that the
Minutes dated December 9,1985,be approved as
submitted.
Motion passed 3-0-2 with Mr.Carter and Mrs.
_Liddy abstaining.
Opened case BA -6-85 to the public and asked for
staff briefing.
Briefed the Board regarding this case and showed
a videotape of the area in question.
Asked the applicant to speak.
Responded and answered questions of the Board.
Closed the hearing to the public and asked for
staff recommendations.
Stated that the recommendations are that the
applicant be limited to seven (7)dwelling units
with the rest of the proposed units developed
as ordinary motel units without dwelling unit
capacity.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES -DECEMBER 18,1985 -PAGE TWO
11.Luddy/Carter MIS "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment
of the City of Apache Junction,Arizona,that
a variance to Section 16.0207,allowing a three
foot (3')side yard setback instead of the required
seven foot (7')side yard setback for a residential
use in a CB -2 General Business Zone is hereby
approved.
The following stipulation(s)shall be conditions
of BA -6-85:
1.That only seven (7)of the additional fifteen
units be allowed as kitchenette units.
.That the development of the property be in
substantial conformance to the plot plan
as approved by the Board of Adjustment with
the west side yard setback of the subject
site being a minimum of three feet (3').
The Findings for approval are:
1.Meeting the seven foot (7')side yard setback
required for residential use in a CB -2 Zone
would work as a hardship by forcing the owners
to offset the construction of the second
story.
2.The number of kitchenette units shall be
limited to seven (7)to reduce the impact
on permanent residents.
3.A kitchenette that is 15'x 20'is not likely
to be suitable for more than one occupant.
4.Granting a variance to allow a three foot
(3')side yard setback instead of the required
seven foot (7')setback will not affect the
health or safety of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood or will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare.
12.Schaffer/Blatterspiel Desired to amend this motion by allowing all
15 units to be built as kitchenettes.
13.Chairman
14.Carter/Schaffer
Respectfully submitted,
ames•Nakagawai Acting EXecdttve Secretary
Amended motion passed 5-0-0.
Asked for a vote on the original motion which
has now been amended to allow all 15 kitchenettes
be built rather than only seven.
Motion passed 5-0-0
Motion -to adjourn.The meeting adjourned at
7:35 P.M.
APPROVED:
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD
APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA
FEBRUARY 10,1986
7:00 P.M.
PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS
Mr.Schaffer Mr.Berry List in
Mr.Carter Planning
Mrs.Blatterspiel Office
Mr.Setliff
Mr.Gardom,Chairman
Mr.Newcomer,Executive Secretary
Mr.Class -Erickson,Staff
Mrs.Reid,Staff
Ms.Ortberg,Recording Secretary
SYNOPSIS
Agenda dated February 10,1986,approved as submitted
Minutes dated December 18,1985,approved as submitted
BA -7-85 approved as submitted
1.Roll Call
2.Blatterspiel/Carter
3.Carter/Schaffer
4.Chairman
5.Mr.Class -Erickson
Five members present with one absent
as noted above.
M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction
Arizona,that the Agenda dated February
10,1986,be approved as submitted."
Motion passed 5-0-0.
M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona,that the Minutes dated December
18,1985,be approved as submitted.
Motion passed 4-0-1 with Mr.Setliff
abstaining.
Opened case BA -7-85 to the public and
asked for staff briefing.
Briefed the Board regarding this case
and showed a videotape of the area in
question.
6.Chairman Asked the applicant to speak.
7.A.E.Sullivan Responded and answered questions.
8.Chairman
9.Mr.Class -Erickson
10.Mr.Newcomer
11.Blatterspiel/Schaffer
Closed the hearing to the public and
asked for staff recommendations.
Stated that the recommendations are
for approval with stipulations.
read the staff's recommended motion
for approval
M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona,that a variance to Sections
17.0106,17.0107,17.0108,17.0109 and
6.0112 of the Zoning Ordinance to permit
an eight foot (8')block wall to be
constructed on the property line is
hereby approved.
12.Carter/Setliff
Respectfully submitted,
(-/7 4f " O ' 2 l e 0t/Charles Newcomer,xecutive Secretary
The following stipulations shall be
conditions of BA -7-85:
1.That development of the property
and construction of the blockwall
be in substantial conformance to
the site plan as approved.
2.An eight foot (8')block wall is
to be constructed on the property
line in substantial conformance
to the site plan.
3.The final determination of the location
on the front property line be made
by the applicant at the time of
submittal of plans for development.
The Findings for approval are:
1.Granting of the variance would help
to buffer the noise generated by
the proposed use from adjacent uses.
2.Granting of the variance would elim-
inate the need for barbed,concertina,
or razor wire for security purposes.
3.Granting a variance to allow an
eight foot (8')blockwall to be
constructed on the property line
will not materially affect the health
or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood and
will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious
to property or improvements in the
neighborhood.
4.Granting of the variance would screen
the industrial use from the public
view.
Motion passed 5-1-0 with Mr.Carter
dissenting.
Motion to adjourn.The meeting adjourned
at 7:40 P.M.
APPROVED:
antoraA.baraom,unairman