HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-08-23 BOA MINUTESBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD
APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA
AUGUST 23,1989
8:37 P.M.
NO WORK SESSION ON AGENDA ITEMS HELD
PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS
Mrs.Blatterspiel Mr.Elliott List in
Mrs.Kelley Mr.Schaffer Planning
Mr.Leffler Office
Mr.Wilson
Mr.Sanchez,Chairman
Mr.Coleman,Staff
Mr.Dunn,Staff
Mr.Nakagawa,Staff
Mr.Hoffman,Executive Secretary
Mrs.Pruitt,Recording Secretary
SYNOPSIS Agenda for August 23,1989 approved as submitted.
Minutes for August 21,1989 approved as submitted.
BA -2-89 approved.
ROLL CALL Five members present with those absent as shown
above.
AGENDA/MINUTES Chairman Sanchez asked for a motion to approve
agenda as presented.
Board Members Kelley/Wilson -M/S
"I make a motion that we approve the agenda dated
August 23,1989."
Motion passed unanimously.
Chairman Sanchez asked for a motion to approve the
minutes.
Board Members Blatterspiel/Kelley -M/S
"I will make a motion that we approve the minutes
for August 21,1989."
Motion passed unanimously.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE TWO
BA -2-89 [NOTE:Case BA -2-89 is an application by Bobby
Beeman,represented by A.Paul Blunt,to appeal the
decision of the Zoning Administrator,regarding what
may and may not be sold and/or stored outside of a
building in a CB -2 General Business zoning district;
Section 16.0200 of the Apache Junction Zoning
Ordinance.The subject property is located on the
southwest side of U.S.Highway 60,approximately
1000 feet northwest of Tomahawk Road.]
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,Item #3 of our agenda this
evening is BA -2-89 which has already been opened to
the public and considerable testimony presented to
the Board.This is still open to the public,and i f
there are any presentations by Mr.Coleman or any
public presentation by Mr.Blunt --[to Mr.Coleman]
"Mr.Coleman,did you have anything further you
would like to...?"
Mr.Coleman:"Not at this time,thank you."
Chairman Sanchez:"Mr.Blunt?"
Paul Blunt:"Mr.Chairman,I assume --I've been told
prior to this meeting that the Board was furnished
with a copy of the record of the prior hearing and
has had a chance to review that record before
tonight's hearing.And obviously,you've had over a
week to think about this --the last hearing --,and
you've also had the benefit of consulting with
counsel.Rather than retrace the rather lengthy
path that we took last week,I will simply state
that we believe that the use we propose to make of
this property is within the letter of the Zoning
Ordinance,certainly,and we feel certainly within
the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance as well.We
believe that we should be allowed the use that we
had proposed within the CB -2 district.And I'd be
happy to answer any questions that the Board may
have,i f i t does have any at this point as a result
of the time it's had to debate this issue and think
about it."
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,there's --there may
possibly [be]some questions that the Board may
have."
Mr.Blunt:"Mr.Chairman,i f I could then,rather
than go through the entire argument which you've
heard at least once and maybe more than once by
reviewing the record,I would like to --and having
you now have the benefit of a week to think about
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE THREE
this and to consult with your counsel,and with that
as your rather solid foundation at this point in
this process,I would like to repeat the essence of
our argument very briefly so that you will --so that
we can all very clearly understand what i t is that
we're --before you.
"We propose to use --when I say 'we,'I mean Bob
Beeman,the entire Beeman family,Arizona Beeman
Drilling Company --proposes to use its CB -2 property
for the 'sale,display,or rental of contractor's
equipment and supply.'That is what we are asking.
We believe that that is clearly spelled out in the
CB -2 ordinance and we should be allowed to do that
with no further restrictions,other than the
restrictions which are stated in subsection C,and
there aren't any.We believe that the use that the
fencing would put around the property,already the
quality of the development is in excess of what the
code requires.We believe that the requirement of a
wholly enclosed building,which was what was imposed
upon us by staff,is not in keeping with CB -2,
subsection C,'Uses';that that would only be found
if we were within the CB -1 use area,which we are
not.
"And the other argument by which additional
restrictions were imposed upon us by staff is that
this use is also arguably found in the CI -1 zoning
district,which is Light Industrial,and that we are
not a CI -1 zone and that therefore this use cannot
be found there.The problem,of course,is that
that denies the very language of CB -2,which says we
can do what we're proposing.And in fact,we're
already within the CI -1 because we're in a wholly
fenced area.But we believe that that 'contractor's
equipment sales yard,'which is referred to in CI -1
refers to a type of use which is completely
different from the use that we are making.
'Contractor's equipment sales yard'is something as
I said last time that you would find at Empire
Machinery,for example,not at Beeman Drilling which
is open to the public and which doesn't sell
contractor's equipment.I t sells its supplies and
i t rents its previous (?)equipment to anyone,a
husband and wife or another company,for that
matter,to drill water wells.So,that's our
argument in a nutshell.We think that it's fair;we
think that i t allows the Board to apply some rules --
not only for this case but for other cases that may
come before it --in a consistent fashion;will not do
violence to your Zoning Ordinance;and will achieve
a very just result here.In a nutshell,that's our
argument."
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE FOUR
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,thank you.Does any
member of the Board wish to gather any information
from either the Zoning Administrator or Mr.Blunt?
Especially Mr.Blunt,since he is now closing?"
Mrs.Kelley:"Yes.Can he specifically tell us
what the business license stated its use --the use of
the business license --what was stated on that
business license?"
[Some unintelligible remarks were made.]
Mr.Blunt:"Mr.Chairman,Mrs.Kelley,just one
moment,please.[pause]"Mr.Beeman believes --of
course he hasn't had a chance to look at the license
tonight,so this is from memory --but he believes
that the city sales --city business license says
'well drilling and pump sales.'Certainly that
would be in keeping with their...."
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,any other questions of
Mr.Blunt."
David Alexander:"Mr.Chairman,is Mr.Blunt going
to have the opportunity to ask Mr.Coleman
questions?"(Chairman Sanchez:"Certainly.")"Are
we going to have the opportunity to ask Mr.Blunt
questions?"
Chairman Sanchez:"You certainly may.If we don't
have a problem with the minutes part of i t since
we're going to have to yield the podium back and
forth unless one of the other microphones works."
Mr.Alexander:"I think this one works."
Chairman Sanchez:"Either that,or use the
microphone and each take their turn at the podium to
ask the questions and answer.I don't know of any
other way to do this."
Mr.Blunt:"I've been accused of having a loud
voice --I assume that it will be no problem."
Chairman Sanchez:"The recorder has to hear you,
though;that's the problem.We can hear you,but I
don't think the recorder can.That's our problem."
Mr.Blunt:"I'm not sure at this point i f I would
necessarily have any exami--any questions for Mr.
Coleman at this point.I think that the arguments
were thoroughly debated at the last hearing.But
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE FIVE
unless something new comes up tonight that has
already been discussed,I doubt that I would have
any questions for Mr.Coleman."
Chairman Sanchez:"There may be some questions the
other way around,though."
Mr.Blunt:"Certainly,and I'm free here to answer
them now,i f he wishes."
Mr.Alexander:"I was...[concerned],Mr.Chairman,
with the opportunity of Mr.Blunt and likewise the
City,as far as cross-examination.I f in fact
Mr.Blunt is satisfied,i f he has had his
opportunity to...,then I'm satisfied."
Mr.Blunt:"And I am.Thank you."
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay.Mr.Coleman,is i t
possible to obtain a copy of the business license?"
Mr.Coleman:"Yes.At this hour?"
?:"Yes,sir."
Mr.Hoffman:"Mr.Chairman,maybe if you would
dispatch me to do that deed,I might be able to do
that,if you desire."
Chairman Sanchez:"Well,we could hold a recess..."
Mr.Hoffman:"Please proceed without me."
Chairman Sanchez:"Well,we could."[laughter]"I
wasn't meaning that facetiously."
Mr.Hoffman:"Shall I do that?"
Chairman Sanchez:"If you wouldn't mind.I think
the Board needs to satisfy themselves.[Mr.Hoffman
left.]"Are there any other questions that you
would like to ask?"
Mr.Leffler:"Yes,Mr.Chairman.Could we ask
Mr.Blunt to sit down?"[laughter]
Mr.Blunt:"I take i t I'm done."
Chairman Sanchez:"He can certainly sit down i f
he's done.But if anyone asks him a question,then
he has to go back to the podium.He's been sitting
for a while."
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE SIX
Mr.Blunt:"Yes,I don't mind sitting all this
time."
Chairman Sanchez:"He....Okay.Our business is in
general complete.I don't know why we don't just
recess until Mr.Hoffman returns."
Mr.Leffler:"Mr.Chairman,I move we recess until
Mr.Hoffman returns."
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,we will recess until
Mr.Hoffman returns."
[Meeting recessed at 8:49 p.m.and reconvened at
8:57 p.m.]
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,we will declare recess
over,and we're back in session."[copies of the
business license were handed out to Board members,
Mr.Blunt and Mr.Heston.]
John Heston [Board's legal counsel]:"One thing we
may want to do for the record --would perhaps the two
attorneys want to stipulate to the introduction of
this as an exhibit?"
Mr.Alexander:"I have no objection;I'm not sure
i f it means anything,but I have no objection."
Mr.Blunt:"I have no objection."
Mr.Hoffman:"The Acting City Manager/City Clerk
indicated that the number on there could be checked
to see i f that included the ability to conduct
retail sales --I guess there are classification
numbers on that with the State.She said she
couldn't determine that.....
Mr.Leffler:"If I may,I would like to ask a
question.Does that just include the C-4 area?"
Mr.Hoffman:"I believe that the business license
is for the business,and I don't believe i t is
fractured for one portion of their property and not
for the other.I f somebody disagrees,speak up."
Mr.Alexander:"Mr.Chairman and Members,you might
ask if that's even the address of their current
business location;I don't think i t is,is it?"
Mr.Coleman (?):"It's not."
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE SEVEN
Mr.Dunn:"What's the address on the business
license?"
Mr.Blunt:"2315 East U.S.60."
Mr.Dunn:"On the application,we have 1341."
Mr.Blunt:"1341's the current address.It's the
same business,but it's a different address."
Bobby Beeman:"I --do you want me to...that's when
we got our business license,that's where we
were..."
Mr.Dunn:"...transfer i t over to this other...?"
Chairman Sanchez:"This is transferrable to the --
either property?"
Mr.Dunn:"I don't know --that was...I don't know i f
i t is or not.I don't know what the situation is
with the business license."
Mr.Hoffman:"Does someone know?"
Mr.Coleman:"Mr.Chairman,I'm not sure what the
zoning district at this location is --that I do not
know,whether or not it's transferrable.We would
in fact write a zoning certificate for a well-
drilling operation at the current location,the same
as we wrote this.I f in fact i t included the 'sale,
rental and display of contractor's equipment,'we
would undoubtedly be resolving that issue in the
same fashion as we are resolving the issue tonight."
Chairman Sanchez:"Well,does i t state that i t says
...[looks like it]excludes retail and simply
circles 'contractor's services' --this license...
that's why I ask i f this is transferrable."
[Several unintelligible comments were made by Board
members,then a long pause.]
Chairman Sanchez:"Well,I think what we're trying
to find out is are they licensed to anything there?
Is this current license transferable over to the
property we're talking about to begin with,or is
this in fact,the storage yard?"
Mr.Heston:"With the Board's permission,I think
that considering the license for any information i t
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE EIGHT
may give you as to the use of the business is an
appropriate use to be made of the evidence.Whether
or not the business license is valid wouldn't have
any impact on whether or not the zoning use was
legal or illegal,and so I'm not sure that's a
question that we need to be answered.Do two
counsel agree?"
Mr.Blunt:"Certainly --absolutely."
Mr.Alexander:"Yes."
Chairman Sanchez:
as..."
"Well,we will accept this in
Mr.Heston:"Perhaps identify it,sir,i f it's all
right,as say 'Board's Exhibit I'?"
Chairman Sanchez:[to Mr.Wilson]"Would you hand
this to Mr.Hoffman?"[Mr.Wilson handed exhibit to
Mr.Hoffman,who handed i t to Mrs.Pruitt.]
Mrs.Pruitt:"Thank you."
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,do we have any further
questions by our attorney...,applicant or Board
members?[Mr.Leffler made an unintelligible
comment.]"Then I will close this meeting to the
public and will ask the Board to deliberate and the
Chair will entertain a motion."
[Several Board members made some unintelligible
comments to one another.]
Mrs.Kelley:"Mr.Chairman,I would like to make a
motion."
Chairman Sanchez:"Mrs.Kelley."
Board Members Kelley/Leffler -M/S
"I move that in case BA -2-89,an Appeal of the
Zoning Administrator's Decision,the Board overrule
the decision of the Zoning Administrator and
interprets Section 16.0201,Uses Permitted in a CB -2
General Business Zone,Apache Junction Zoning
Ordinance,as it applies to this case as follows:
The applicants have proposed the following uses for
their property described in this application:
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE NINE
1.Sale,rental or display of contractor's equipment
and/or supplies.
2.Sale,rental or display of commercial machinery.
The uses proposed by the applicants are not required
to be conducted within a completely enclosed
building in a CB -2 General Business Zoning district,
but must be conducted within an area enclosed on all
sides by a solid wall,compact evergreen hedge,or
uniformly painted board fence,not less than six
feet (6')in height.
The findings --the reasons for my feelings on this --
are:
1.There is question whether the Zoning Adminis-
trator,this Board,Mr.Blunt,or anyone else can
determine artibrarily when an article ceases to
be on display and begins to be in storage.
2.Because there is no ordinance that specifies when
a display item becomes a storage item,thus
requiring a wall,hedge,or fence,i t puts us in
an ambiguous position concerning the interpreta-
tion of the existing zoning ordinances.
3.The ambiguity regarding the storage/display has
brought about the arbitrary ruling by the Zoning
Administrator.It would appear that the property
owner would be under undue hardship,and I would
like to refer to the Arizona Statute 9-462.01,
which states that the statutes granting legis-
lative power for adopting zoning ordinances will
be strictly construed and any ambiguity or
uncertainty shall be decided in favor of the
property owner.
4.The property owner will have to address and
remove those items that do not fall into the
category of being a business related item,and I
feel that at this time the double -wide mobile is
a matter of question,and I recommend that the
Board direct the property owner to remove that
item within 30 days."
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,you've heard the motion by
Mrs.Kelley.Do I have a second?"
Mr.Leffler:"I second it."
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES
n -e-e4
Ge6rge9R.HoffdiaX'Executive Secretary
AUGUST 23,1989 PAGE TEN
Chairman Sanchez:"We have a second by
Mr.Leffler.Any discussion?Hearing none,I will
ask for a roll call vote."
Mrs.Pruitt:"Mrs.Kelley...(Mrs.Kelley:"Yes");
Mr.Leffler...(Mr.Leffler:"Yes");
Mrs.Blatterspiel...(Mrs.Blatterspiel:"Yes");
Mr.Wilson...(Mr.Wilson:"Yes");Mr.Sanchez...
(Mr.Sanchez:"No")."
[Motion passed 4-0-1 with Chairman Sanchez
dissenting.]
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,Mr.Coleman,Mr.Blunt:
the Board has --majority of the Board has voted to
overrule the Zoning Administrator's decision,with
certain stipulations.I guess we can go from
there.I certainly appreciate all the undue waiting
you've had to undergo tonight and the previous
nights of the lengthy delays and postponement,and
thank you very much for your indulgence."
Mr.Blunt:"Mr.Chairman,on behalf of the Beeman
family,it was certainly --frankly,a privilege to be
here,and we were not at all dismayed by the time
and effort that you took;quite the opposite,
frankly.I want to say thank you very much."
Chairman Sanchez:"Okay,we have no further
business at hand this evening.The Chair will
entertain a motion to adjourn."
Board Members Wilson/Leffler -M/S
"I make a motion we adjourn."
Mr.Leffler:"I second it."
Chairman Sanchez:"Second to my left here.Hearing
no objections,this meeting adjourns."
[Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.]
Ken Sanc ez,Chairman
ORDER
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA
CASE NO.BA -2-89
DATE OF HEARING:August 23,1989
APPLICANT:Bobby Beeman (Arizona Beeman Drilling Company)
PROPERTY LOCATION:1341 East U.S.Highway 60
TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:102-02-006
ZONING DISTRICT:CB -2
REQUEST:
ALLEGED ERROR:
Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's Decision regarding
what may and may not be sold or/and stored outside of a
building in a CB -2 General Business zoning district.
The Zoning Administrator has erroneously forbidden the
Applicant from utilizing certain portions of his CB -2
property for the keeping and display of retail equip-
ment and supplies and commercial vehicles within a
wholly fenced and screened area.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:MIS Board Members Kelley/Leffler
"I move that in case BA -2-89,an Appeal of the
Zoning Administrator's Decision,the Board
overrule the decision of the Zoning Administrator
and interprets Section 16.0201,Uses Permitted in
a CB -2 General Business Zone,Apache Junction
Zoning Ordinance,as it applies to this case as
follows:
The applicants have proposed the following uses
for their property described in this application:
1.Sale,rental or display of contractor's
equipment and/or supplies.
2.Sale,rental or display of commercial
machinery.
The uses proposed by the applicants are not
required to be conducted within a completely
enclosed building in a CB -2 General Business
Zoning district,but must be conducted within an
area enclosed on all sides by a solid wall,
compact evergreen hedge,or uniformly painted
board fence,not less than six feet (6')in
height.
ORDER -BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT -CASE NO.BA -2-89
Page 2
en Sanaez,Chaiftan
Board of Adjustment
xc:File (original)
Applicant
City Council
The findings --the reasons for my feelings on this --
are:
1.There is question whether the Zoning Adminis-
trator,this Board,Mr.Blunt,or anyone else
can determine artibrarily when an article
ceases to be on display and begins to be in
storage.
2.Because there is no ordinance that specifies
when a display item becomes a storage item,
thus requiring a wall,hedge,or fence,it
puts us in an ambiguous position concerning
the interpretation of the existing zoning
ordinances.
3.The ambiguity regarding the storage/display
has brought about the arbitrary ruling by the
Zoning Administrator.It would appear that
the property owner would be under undue
hardship,and I would like to refer to the
Arizona Statute 9-462.01, which states that
the statutes granting legislative power for
adopting zoning ordinances will be strictly
construed and any ambiguity or uncertainty
shall be decided in favor of the property
owner.
4.The property owner will have to address and
remove those items that do not fall into the
category of being a business related item,and
I feel that at this time the double -wide
mobile is a matter of question,and I
recommend that the Board direct the property
owner to remove that item within 30 days."
Motion passed 4-0-1 with Chairman Sanchez
dissenting.
8/29/89
(Date)
Zoning Administrator/Building Official
Central File
Planning and Zoning Commission