Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 01.31 City Council Work Session Agenda PgACHE G °�" " "� pity of Apache Junction 0 Horne of the .S-uperstition Mountains APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 EAST SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85219 Monday,January 31, 2011 7:00 PM AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2. ROLL CALL. 3. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PINAL COUNTY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. Presentation on and discussion by David Maestas,Transportation Planner for Pinal County Public Works Department, on all elements of regional transit, including projected transit demand and forms of governance and funding 4. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON CASE AM-4-10,PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ACCOMMODATE AND REGULATE MEDICAL MARIJUANA USES,INCLUDING DISPENSARIES,ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE CULTIVATION FACILITIES,AND AT-HOME CULTIVATION. Pursuant to the approval of Proposition 203 by the voters of Arizona in the last general election,the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act allows for the use,sale,cultivation and transport of medical marijuana for qualifying patients,their designated caregivers,dispensaries and dispensary agents. Cities are allowed to enact reasonable land use controls on these uses. 5. PRESENTATION ON CURRENT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT PROJECTS HAPPENING IN DOWNTOWN APACHE JUNCTION. The Downtown Redevelopment and Implementation Strategy adopted by the city council with the approval of Resolution No 10-34 recommends specific goals and strategies geared toward fostering revitalization in the downtown There are a number of public and private investment projects currently underway and staff would like to provide the council with a highlight of these projects and the positive impact these investments will have on the downtown and community. 6- ADJOURNMENT. Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the City Clerk's office 300 East Superstition Boulevard,Apache Junction,AZ Monday through Friday,8.00 a m to 5 00 p m,excluding holidays If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation,please notify the Human Resources Office,at (480)474-2617 or(480)983-0095(TDD)at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled time. *pRHJ ' G2o Ci .1 ofofApache junction I !mare qt.the .Super:ftarot?;\1ourttai,zs 44sizoilti Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM Giao Pham, P.E., City Engineer DATE: January 31, 2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Community Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PINAL COUNTY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Presentation on and discussion by David Maestas, Transportation Planner for Pinal County Public Works Department, on all elements of regional transit, including projected transit demand and forms of governance and funding. FISCAL IMPACT: OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: (RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download No Attachments Available ( ( ( ( Pinal County ( Transit Feasibility Study ( ( Briefing Book . 4.. c _I,. . * _ 4 - Bomb. - , ! a • Illik 4* 41.— C . ... ' 7'4 4 1 I Aga , i f • ..' '. e P..ji% . . W . •• .I• ffil...*.1;*1 ( *IL! _ - . 14141111, Mpl‘. ......... .a. • \ ' 416.1d • ...._ ----- , „...- O - ,....., ._ •, „ . ,,.. I O " oo,,,, ..titz-...... L -1.. . , avlbuip PIP - - 0 ' ier l'. Vli Ail) t lia iiiii NIP 411 I 0 „ I#2 i . - 40, I 0 O 111011"11,1 i 1> "ftw 102a , _ • , _ Aii - ( . i Ilk • I A 1 op ( 'S. ` I '' /1E55 Z; „, / TRCI . ‘," , , , 4 1 r I , 1 'et — a ( - ........_ _. ( • -,:'' ( ( P I NAL • COUNTY October 2010 ( wide open opportunity ( ( Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book • Situated in the heart of the rapidly-growing Sun Corridor, Pinal • In 2006, Pinal County conducted a Small Area Transportation Study. County's population is expected to increase from 362,000 to The study, in part, found that there was demand for public transit II approximately one million residents by 2025. and recommended that this form of transportation be further II • To prepare for such rapid growth, Pinal County completed the Pinal explored. County Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) in 2009. The Comp Plan is • The Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study was launched in Decem- a landmark document that steers the county on a course of action ber 2008 to further study demand for public transit, and if demand IP to plan for future growth, preserve the quality of life and promote was sufficient, to explore ways to create, administer and sustain a sustainability. regional transit system. ( • Transportation and circulation are central elements of growth plan- • The Transit Study covered these major areas: Existing Conditions; ping and therefore are an important part of the Comp Plan. Existing Transit Services; Population Forecasting and Demand Modern, well planned and sustainable communities strive to Modeling; Proposed Transit Route Options; Study of Governance; • Public Participation. incorporate well-balanced transportation systems comprised of 111 several elements: roadways, buses, rail, vanpools, volunteer driver • Thirty three Stakeholder Interviews were conducted with 64 key programs, and walking and bicycle paths. individuals from communities throughout Pinal County to solicit • It is the combined use of all these multimodal transportation interest and concerns regarding public transit. elements that make it easier to travel and sustain growth while • Two major themes emerged from talking with key community 411 reducing traffic congestion, improving air quality and decreasing leadership and the study's advisory committee, which were the i fossil fuel consumption. need for: S 1. Connectivity between communities. O 2. Standardization of local community transit systems.'IP ... . � w � . PINAL COUNTY 1 Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book f f I • Between 2000 and 2007, Pinal County's incorporated areas grew by 66%. The largest growth occurred in Casa Grande, Apache Junction, 0 Maricopa and Florence. 0 • During the same period, unincorporated areas of Pinal County grew by 105%. San Tan Valley has become the county's largest community and 0 the fastest-growing, with a population of approximately 80,000. • The City of Maricopa,which had fewer than 700 residents in 2000 is now the county's fourth largest community. . • Casa Grande,Apache Junction, Eloy and Florence will grow to medium size cities that will also become regional employment centers. 111 • Undeveloped areas between Apache Junction and San Tan Valley will be developed. 41 • Most of the western half of the county between the Gila River I Indian Community to the north and the Tohono O'Odham Indian Community to the south will be developed and largely centered around Casa Grande and Eloy. • The City of Maricopa will continue to Pinal County Land Use Plan grow. Travel will continue to be highly i. '\\ oriented toward Maricopa County, .» w• ' "`` ilCurrent Development but also with higher levels of travel to411 Casa Grande. Future Development CM* I • In general,there will be an arc of t development around the eastern N.,. T -- ° 4 • - and southern sides of the Gila River '` k. - Indian Community and along I-10 �, - - 1r between Casa Grande and Eloy. _T ,� tt 1 =. Rm° m,�,m m. A F Mt .Hr ry[.,hwr • The eastern part of the county will ,� .rt rrf: - R f,, L'e..m, Z^ ,. ,:, slower ace. However, . a.-.... ,,- „-%--, " �'-- grow at a p `� substantial transit needs exist 1'""` ' I ti primarily for medical care. Special I 1 ;, L I~! I - - consideration should be given to ,jam- - . 1--, } Alli this area, which has an important need for transit, but which lacks the t ! population density normally desired r -_` -•,, in an efficient transit model. ► -ifil �".„. Mevi = -:t fin .. FINAL COUNTY 2 • 0 0 Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book • i 41111617311. - 1776111W. :_. 0 • Generally, much employment travel today leaves Pinal County. 1111 • In the future, as the county's economic base grows,there will be substantial growth in travel both within and into Pinal County. • The largest travel flow will be between Apache Junction and Maricopa County. Today, travel moves from Apache Junction toward Maricopa a County by a ratio of two to one. In the future, the ratio will fall to approximately four to three, meaning that more travel will be from Maricopa • County toward Apache Junction. • The amount of travel from Maricopa to Maricopa County will more than double to 76,000 trips. The amount of travel from Maricopa to Casa Grande will quintuple to 76,000 as the economic and employment base in this area grows. a • Travel originating from Florence and the San Tan Valley toward Maricopa County will more than triple from 25,000 trips per day to 85,000. Travel originating from Maricopa County toward these locations will quadruple from 10,000 trips per day to 41,000. II . • The amount of travel between Casa 2025 Travel Flows: All Trip Types Grande and Maricopa County will _._ _.__ ______._ _._._.______________._______�._ 02 is increase from 17,000 trips per day to Pinal County Districts i 52,000. Casa Grande will experience -- -- Pie �-�Gt.trat Zone. an increase in travel from Maricopa R., w 1"•«" Y County, but not as much increase as ,,.�f.� o S 10 . communities located further north. _ '� ' NI.ricopa Noun _ = .. ,� 1\� 1A+l:++EC]illtt1 • 11f All L � ; ill I i L.11/11..11-1.4) !::..r.••. rifir.' 1\ I I ;\ 1 1 1 0 •__; U'LLl(3dLIL W\ • \,\' • 'e -• . ' ;it \\ rtra tOrtrr.tryprr/i Wag w.�.1.0 \\, The brown arrows represent uw , --1•''-" trip counts between counties. 63K I - , The green arrows represent trips ,. originating and terminating withinttcx.,, ,,«, r��, `""` Pinal County. . County ___.1:._____._.�___J ID PINAL COUNTY 3 ) Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book What Types of Services are Possible? ) • Transit can be provided in a number of ways depending upon travel volumes and the operating environment. . • In the short-term, bus services, volunteer driver, and carpooling and vanpooling programs will be most appropriate. • Over the longer-term, as Pinal County grows, higher volume services may also be needed. ) . Typical Characteristics Example ) v 1 r ansit Centers Acts as the region's major transit focal point and the '' '_,.q F hub for local and regional services. ftt ,LL• Park and Ride Provides access to major trunk bus services,and `"t �'14.. ) c Lots provide staging areas for carpools,vanpools,and ca�utt , ,v SLUG commuting PARK rRef . r` Commuter Rail Provides fast,limited stop service,generally to and .24,,_ from major downtown areas.Often operates on '"'•.. I i • =4 freight rail lines Light Rail Provides rail service that operates in on-street and t— •• ` ' .," exclusive right-of-way environments. ' , • Bus Rapid Transit Provides rail-like service in high volume transit corri- " ... "_:-- dors;typically has exclusive rights-of-ways/exclusive ' :111 .' -1 0 bus lanes,transit prioritiy at signals,limited stops, tag enhanced stop/station facilities,and unique identity 41 Express Bus Fast,limited-stopcommuter-oriented service.Often . r� p provide no off-peak service or only limited off-peak • a i service. o Fixed-Route Bus Most common type of bus service;effective in a , 2 wide variety of settings. rri Area-based Flex Provides curb-to-curb service within a defined geo- 717 Route graphic area adn to adn from a specific point,such as a transit hub for connections to regional services. . Volunteer Driver Provides service to targeted populations(for exam- par/� . vol me seniors persons prov with disabilities)using _ volunteer drivers who provide their own vehicles. Drivers are reimbursed for mileage but not for labor. Carpools Provides a travel alternative that is less expensive than driving and often more convenient than taking transit. I Vanpools Provides similar options as carpools,but for larger Illifib' ` , groups of travelers.Subsidized vans are often pro- t« �F vided,which reduces user costs. �'�amirr ''+ II . ' PINAL COUNT) 4 1 ( 0 0 Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefin: Book, • 11111111 iirmirmir , „ • • Over the short-term, it is likely that growth will be slower than the growth that occurred between 2000 and 2007. 0 • Potential short-term improvements should be oriented toward the current population and planning should be done for moderate growth. • Short-Term improvements include: III - Transit Centers at key locations, around which transit services could be focused. 0 - Park and Ride lots along key bus routes (that could also be used as staging areas for vanpools and carpools). - Express service from Maricopa, Casa Grande, San Tan Valley and Apache Junction to downtown Phoenix with connections to light rail and Sky Harbor International Potential Short-Term Improvements III Airport. - Arterial BRT Service between ..: - `- • �,: KEY Apache Junction and the end of " '` ` r '; the Metro Rail Line (using existing • Currently Developed Areaa I• Valley Metro Link BRT corridor). _ � -Villa,Metro Lpni Rai 0 - ..r.- Vallal Maim Link(BM)Regional routes between Florence O Valle,Mahn luck IBRT)E Kianwn and Casa Grande via Coolidge and WIWyMelm e"LoulSke Central Arizona College, between 1- --— I © YaI�,M„Im`� Y�ISeeErienso' �:_.._�._ _J -Final Cearty la(BRT) Maricopa and Casa Grande and ` - - .Q-PmalCouley Express Route part time service between Arizona Y 0 ©-Pnalc Cooly Raga nal Roan and Casa Grande via Eloy and U Pmai County PaiFTima Regargl Rwie 111 Toltec. y e Paul County Flo Rou . - Local circulator service within Pm AO Laval Bus Senke Apache Junction, Casa Grande and - \,:-...:. - - p Traimi Genie Coolidge. i , p Park and Rxfela II. .... ri:N yy \ ��� " Hb Ual short Term Impro em•nts . NNuuI ►d __ _. _ ( PINAL COUNTY 5 Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book 0 I •P • O . . 1 .. n : -T- . Transit I a p iv - ents a -* Ir ° rt oun j s populatio 'will grow o aipp i mate one illion. - . ' • As the county grows, many areas will change significantly, thereby creating significantly more demand for transit service. • • In most cases, the services to be provided in 2025 would be in addition to the services implemented in the short-term. II • In some cases, services Potential Long-Term Improvements a or facilities could be replaced by other R= s s ', DEVELOPMENT 41 ,a. .tea+r . += .a .= Current Development \ • services or facilities. k o ln�mH..•me ^• f For example, a park Future Development and ride lot used RAs Reslectil, 1003d Rine Rescieututt t0 o s du •• .• ... V.ry lne lkmay Re*'Us^aM �leMt 41 In the short term I .2..,.,a.., .._I t rkMay RnnknPM 10.0 M'ntl could potentially be Mmte•N.leRnensT,Rroe.miM 1 •.�. 1 i ��t....rw I SO ncl . replaced by a transit '2 fat "'� (°nMaR.. m asa mr,�� p �j �.�i�i. .Y�x..•.. .... II.Hill Density R.saYraylrausM41 Center when volumes •� - MID MaMti,,Rmot,w Fm+txe Increase. \ r ... aakN .. Cn Cmpreyma,0 , ...\ ;, .\\ SD Fmrknme^r II., IND M.N.nn HAW Ca^a•ce Cnre. \ '0 Mlad Ira Activity Canto .u' 41 r'I MAI.9n,ty An vAy Come •i el - I.•• ..• w 1 Nair � _. TRANSIT SERVICES \,, I1 1 1 Valley Metro bent l Red IIe• i - I — Valley Metro Link IBRT! A Phoenix Tucson Intent,/Rail I •1 . -0-Pmal County Link IBRTI w M r L t a.�..I Rrl _ .o-Penal County Express Route grymrrlya� • �\ -o Pm*County Regional Route ` rraM'+r _ \•Pesiessinymmiimpr • -• 0 Ptnal County Part-Tine Regional Route Q Plnal County Fb.•Rcute Area OF Luray Bus Service i ,.;n a. 0 Transit Center j.• (� pF,l pal and Ride Let r ... . 1 - Ili(,-,- ... , * irlia► Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study ' Potential Long•Term Improvements NelsonlNypaard PINAI. C0ITNTI 6 ( Pinal Count Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book , ow Cou • 11 �t r�ra iiw hat is the Best Appro . 0' ( Ill� All This .A or Pinal Count ( • One of the challenges in creating an effective regional transit • Today, Pinal County's transit needs are still relatively limited, but system in a rapidly growing area is to first develop an institutional are growing. structure under which this can be done. ( The county's long-term transit needs will be much greater and • Throughout Arizona and the country, transit service is provided by different from its short-term transit needs. ( many different types of organizations that use a wide variety of • As the recession has illustrated, Pinal County's growth will not be ( governance structures: linear, but will both slow and accelerate, depending on economic ( and other conditions. - County and city operated transit systems where transit is provided as a departmental function governed by county board • Growth will not occur at the same rate throughout the county. ( or city council. Some communities may grow rapidly, while others grow moder- ately. Then the reverse can occur where moderate growth commu- - Regional Transportation Authorities or Transit Authorities that nities become rapid growth communities. This implies the need for operate independently of the governments of the areas they flexibility in a transit system. serve. (although usually with board level representation from • Pinal County will need an approach that is flexible and can evolve those governments) as needs change. Of all the governance options available, a Joint - Joint Power Organizations (JPOs) created by multiple govern Powers Organization (JPO) appears to offer the best balance of 1110 ments agencies to provide service using the powers of the effectiveness and flexibility, plus the ability to start small and adjust member governments, and that are governed by represents and expand as needs grow. ( tives appointed by the member governments. - Provision of service through intergovernmental agreements, where the agreements are approved by the governing boards of the participating parties. ( ,, 40 ( t a Ill II 'M ,`. , 1340,l t r* Aftrz, ear Fr Pt( Mel . n 01 110IW Milikr 'P ( W., . , 1 ( PINAL COUNTY 7 I Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book - - - 0 What is a Joint Powo Will Pay s n _ �� • • • • To develop._,.6 hs ,locaI sources of funding will be needed to lever- A JPO is a nonprofit corporation comprised of local governments that age available state and federal funding. 0 is created for a specific purpose, in this case to create and operate a # transit system. It requires no public vote and does not have any taxing • Pinal County's existing transportation excise tax revenue could authority. A JP0 would not create any new tax. An example of a JPO in potentially be used to fund transit or to provide local matching I Arizona is the Metro Light Rail. funds to qualify for funding from the Federal Transit Administra- 0 tion. However, this might require a local election to expand it from A JPO would be designed to: exclusive roadway use to roadway and transit use. 1. Foster collaboration between the county, cities, and Indian • The existing transportation excise tax revenue is currently Communities distributed to the communities in the county. If a JPO form of 4 2. Set and drive transportation policy transit administration is selected,the communities will continue to receive the same amount of transportation excise tax revenue and 3. Develop, implement and provide transit service for member would pay the JPO for the type and level of service they desire. organizations. 4. Program transit projects +♦ 5. Develop financial plans to fund and implement 0 6. Receive and administer transit funding I 7. Ensure appropriate financial contributions from involved 0 r s.a ptie f . 'I . NM f ta ,lli v v ,.„ .�"s �fi ;. �r�MIS� V� y �.' Ws,�w - ... A' M , .f A" 1 r r I 0 I' INA.L COl1NTl - . , 8 Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study Briefing Book ( 1111Mnr1SITAIate demand exists today for transit in Pinal County. • Demand will grow rapidly between now and 2025 due to rapid 110 population growth. ( • A well-balanced multimodal transportation system is needed to ( move the public while minimizing roadway congestion, protecting ( air quality and minimizing fossil fuel consumption. • A multimodal transportation system includes a network of transit systems that includes local circulators in each community, con- nected by a regional commuter system, using transit centers at key ( locations. ,u • A Joint Powers Organization, governed by a board of representa- tives from all participating communities appears to be the best option to unify the regional transit effort while allowing flexibility as the county grows. • Participating communities pay only for the type and level of service they need, using existing transportation tax revenue. • As needs change, communities may opt out of the JPO, or other communities can join after JPO formation. • • Planning for a well-balanced multimodal transportation system is k • Al" a key strategy in preparing for growth and sustaining prosperity in Pinal County. O i . PINAL COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) David R. Maestas, MPA ) Project Manager ) Pinal County Transit Feasibility Study ) Pinal County Public Works ) 520-866-6393 david.maestas@pinalcountyaz.gov °,91 Kathy Borquez ) Special Projects Manager ) Pinal County Public Works ) PI N A L • COUNTY 520-866-6406 wide open opportunity kathy.borquez@pinalcountyaz.gov 0 �� ' 41 t.._,10 a ache junction .x'>M Z I tome of the u ei:'tztion Alouftatns g Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Rudy Esquivias, Senior Planner/Zoning Administrator DATE: January 31, 2011 '1.264genda Type • Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Additional Item Outside Scope of Identified Council Priorities TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON CASE AM-4-10, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ACCOMMODATE AND REGULATE MEDICAL MARIJUANA USES, INCLUDING DISPENSARIES, ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE CULTIVATION FACILITIES, AND AT-HOME CULTIVATION ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Pursuant to the approval of Proposition 203 by the voters of Arizona in the last general election, the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act allows for the use, sale, cultivation and transport of medical marijuana for qualifying patients, their designated caregivers, dispensaries and dispensary agents. Cities are allowed to enact reasonable land use controls on these uses. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: Zoning Ordinance Requirement RECOMMENDATION The Commission will hear and recommend on this case on January 25, 2011 Their recommendation will be presented to Council at their work session on January 31. ATTACHMENTS: Click to download D AM-4-10 ❑ P&Z Report ❑ Draft Language ❑ DHS Schedule ❑ Public Input Aft. 4me. (4) , nn� City p of Apache Junction ,4 lzot" Development Services Department DATE: January 31, 2011 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members THROUGH: George Hoffman, City Manager Brad Steinke, Development Services Director Fred Baker, Planning Manager FROM: Rudy Esquivias, Senior Planner/Zoning Admin. SUBJECT: Jan. 31, 2011, City Council Work Session Item: Case AM-4-10 - Proposed Text Amendments to Zoning Ordinance to Allow Medical Marijuana Uses. Summary At their meeting of December 7, 2010, the City Council directed Staff to process the necessary amendments to the Zoning Ordinance through the P&Z Commission, to accommodate and regulate marijuana uses in the city, pursuant to the voters' approval of Proposition 203, the Medical Marijuana Act. PiZ Commission Meetings and Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission held a work session discussion on AM-4-10 on January 11 and their public hearing was held on January 25. At the time of submittal of this work session item to the Council, the Commission had not yet made its recommendation. Their recommendation shall be presented to Council at their work session on January 31. The Commission' s staff report is presented to the Council for their review. It is imperative for the City to have its ordinance adopted and in effect before April 1, 2011, when the State Department of Health Services is expected to have their operating rules for dispensaries and cardholders in place. Otherwise, the city risks not being able to exercise land use controls over these proposed uses . If adjustments need to be made to our ordinance once the State establishes its final rules, those amendments may be made later on. Tonight' s item is presented for discussion purposes only. Attached: AM-4-10 P&Z Report, Draft Language, DHS Schedule, State Statute; Input - PQp,CH ✓ Zia - -= city of Apache Junction Development Services Department DATE: JANUARY 25, 2011 MEMO TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMBERS THROUGH: BRAD STEINKE, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR FRED BAKER, PLANNING DIVISION MANAGER FROM: RUDY ESQUIVIAS, SENIOR PLANNER/ZONING ADMIN. SUBJECT: JANUARY 25, 2011, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM CASE AM-4-10, PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT TO REGULATE MEDICAL MARIJUANA USES BACKGROUND: Proposition 203 is a ballot initiative approved during the general election on November 2, 2010 The initiative enacts a group of statutes titled the "Arizona Medical Marijuana Act," to include a new Chapter 28 1 in Title 36 and amendment of Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) §43-1201. The new law decriminalizes possession, sale and cultivation of marijuana for certain purposes under state law and provides for the establishment of non-profit medical marijuana dispensaries and off-site cultivation locations The law allows, on a statewide basis, one dispensary and off-site cultivation location for every 10 pharmacies, thus approximately 120 dispensaries could be established in Arizona, with at least one for every county in which an application has been approved The law requires dispensaries to be at least 500 feet from a public or pnvate school, but has no other requirements. Local communities can establish zoning requirements for the location of dispensaries and off-site cultivation locations Many Arizona communities are in the process of adopting ordinance changes to accommodate these new uses. The law specifically permits cities, towns and counties to enact zoning regulations for such medical marijuana dispensaries, and the City has the authority to enact such zoning regulations pursuant to ARS Title 9, Article 6 1 The Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, allows a "qualifying patient" who has a "debilitating medical condition" to obtain an "allowable amount of marijuana" from a "non-profit medical marijuana dispensary" and to possess and use the marijuana to treat or alleviate the debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the condition. 1 The Arizona Department of Health Services (DHS) would be required to adopt and enforce a regulatory system for the distribution of marijuana for medical use, including a system for approving, renewing and revoking the registration of qualifying patients, designated caregivers, non-profit dispensaries and dispensary agents The costs of the regulatory system would be paid from application and renewal fees collected, civil penalties imposed and private donations received pursuant to the proposition A "qualifying patient" is defined as a person who has been diagnosed by a physician (a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, naturopathic medicine or homeopathy) as having one of -- the following debilitating medical conditions 1 Cancer. 2 Glaucoma 3 Positive status for human immunodeficiency virus. 4. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome 5 Hepatitis C 6. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. 7 Crohn's disease 8 Agitation of Alzheimer's disease. 9 A chronic or debilitating disease or medical condition or its treatment that produces any of the following a Cachexia or wasting syndrome b Severe and chronic pain c. Severe nausea. d Seizures (including those characteristic of epilepsy) e. Severe and persistent muscle spasms (including those characteristic of multiple sclerosis). 10 Any other medical condition or its treatment added by DHS through a public petition process. In order to register with OHS, a qualifying patient must submit a signed written certification issued by the physician that states the physician's professional opinion that the patient is likely to receive therapeutic or symptom-relieving benefits from the -- medical use of marijuana to treat or alleviate a debilitating medical condition The certification must specify the debilitating medical condition and must be made in the course of a physician-patient relationship after the physician has completed a full assessment of the patient's medical history If the qualifying patient is under 18 years of age, the patient's custodial parent or legal guardian must submit written certifications from two physicians and the custodial parent or legal guardian must consent in writing to control the patient's medical use of the marijuana A qualifying patient who is registered with DHS (or a registered designated caregiver on behalf of the qualifying patient) may obtain up to 2 5 ounces of marijuana in a 14-day period from a registered non-profit medical marijuana dispensary If the qualifying patient's home is located more than 25 miles from the nearest non-profit medical marijuana dispensary, the patient or designated caregiver may cultivate up to 12 marijuana plants in an enclosed, locked facility 2 A registered non-profit medical marijuana dispensary must be operated on a not-for- profit basis, but may receive payment for all expenses incurred in its operation DNS may not issue more than one non-profit medical marijuana dispensary registration certificate for every ten pharmacy permits issued by the Arizona State Board of Pharmacy under current law The dispensary may cultivate marijuana only in an enclosed, locked facility and may acquire marijuana from a registered qualifying patient or designated caregiver if the patient or caregiver is not compensated for the marijuana The proposition specifies various security, record-keeping and verification requirements relating to the operation of dispensaries. Proposition 203 generally provides that any person who acts in conformity with the requirements of the proposition is not subject to any governmentally imposed sanction relating to the medical use of marijuana This proposition would prohibit certain discriminatory practices, including the following 1 A school or landlord may not refuse to enroll or lease to a person registered pursuant to this proposition unless failing to do so would cause the school or landlord to lose a monetary or licensing benefit under federal law 2 An employer may not discriminate against a person registered pursuant to this proposition in hiring, terminating or imposing employment conditions unless failing to do so would cause the employer to lose a monetary or licensing benefit under federal law. Further, an employer may not penalize a qualifying patient registered pursuant to this proposition for a positive drug test for marijuana, unless the patient used, possessed or was impaired by marijuana on the employment premises or during hours of employment. Proposition 203 would not. 1 Authorize a person to undertake any task under the influence of marijuana that constitutes negligence or professional malpractice. 2 Authorize possessing or using medical marijuana on a school bus, on the grounds of a preschool, primary school or high school or in a correctional facility. 3 Authorize smoking marijuana on public transportation or in a public place 4 Authorize operating, navigating or being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle, aircraft or motorboat while under the influence of marijuana. A registered qualifying patient would not be considered to be under the influence of marijuana solely because of the presence of marijuana in the person's system that appears in a concentration insufficient to cause impairment 5. Require a government medical assistance program or private health insurer to reimburse a person for costs associated with the medical use of marijuana 6. Require an owner of private property to allow the use of marijuana on that property 7. Require an employer to allow the ingestion of marijuana in the workplace 3 8. Prevent a nursing care or other residential or inpatient healthcare facility from adopting reasonable restrictions on the provision, storage and use of marijuana by residents or patients. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION: This item was scheduled for work session discussion and direction to staff at the City Council meetings of December 6th and 7th, respectively At their regular meeting on December 7, the City Council directed staff to initiate a Zoning Code Text Amendment that included for consideration, the following items 1 Limits the location of medical marijuana dispensaries and off-site cultivation locations to commercial and industrial zones, creates definitions for dispensaries and off-site cultivation locations, allows dispensaries with on-site cultivation to be located in commercial or industrial zones, allows off-site cultivation facilities (not co-located with a dispensary) to be only in industrial zones; prohibits medical marijuana dispensaries and/or off-site cultivation locations in any Planned Community District. 2 Requires a dispensary or off-site cultivation facility to be located in a permanent building, not in a cargo container, manufactured building of any kind, RV, trailer, or motor vehicle. 3. Requires a Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission for a medical marijuana dispensary or medical marijuana off-site cultivation location 4 Requires a Conditional Use Permit application for a dispensary or medical marijuana cultivation to include, at a minimum, the following supplemental information. • Certification that the property owner is aware the property will be used for marijuana dispensing or cultivating and providing documentation that the applicant can meet DHS standards for approval, • Requires a list of the operating organization's officers and board of directors and a certification that the operators comply with requirements in the law prohibiting criminal history, • Application or acknowledgement to obtain a City Business or Operating License; • Limit on floor area and hours of operation, • Prohibition on drive-through pickup windows and delivery service, and • Prohibition on outdoor seating areas at dispensaries and cultivation locations. 4 Required spacing requirements • At least 2,000 feet from other dispensaries and off-site cultivation locations; • At least 1,000 feet from schools, day care centers and churches, • At least 1,000 feet from drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities, • A least 1,000 feet from other sensitive land uses as determined by the Zoning Administrator on a case by case basis, and • Allows the Planning and Zoning Commission to add permit conditions necessary to conserve and promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare 5 Additional Requirements to consider • Security Plan including lighting, alarms, secure storage, and other necessary building safety measures, • Prohibit on-site consumption, • Limit to one dispensary per ten pharmacies in the City, • No off-site cultivation without associated dispensary; and • No more than one off-site cultivation location per dispensary. 6. In the event that a qualifying patient in the City limits is 25 miles or farther from a dispensary, said individual may apply for a CUP to cultivate no more than twelve (12) marijuana plants at their place of residency (with owner's permission) subject to the same types of appropriate applicable conditions and precautions as above for security, use and documentation PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION: Unlike other City-initiated amendments to our codes, this amendment case carries with it a certain sense of urgency insofar as getting it adopted in a timely manner Under the law, DHS is required to have their operating rules in place within 120 days of the passage of the law (see DHS schedule attached). That means that OHS should have its rules in place around the beginning of April After that, they will begin processing applications from dispensaries, agents, qualifying patients and caregivers. Apache Junction must have its land use regulations adopted and in effect before April 1st as well, or else we risk not being able to regulate dispensaries in the City other than the minimum 500 foot rule from a school. At their work session on January 11, the P&Z Commissioners reviewed the 1st draft language for the proposed text amendments The Commissioners had many questions and suggested several changes to the proposed language. The changes discussed with Staff include 5 • prohibiting a Designated Caregiver from cultivating marijuana plants at their home in the City of Apache Junction, for a person in his or her care who lives 25 miles from a dispensary, if a dispensary is located within 25 miles of the Caregiver's home, • use the appropriate term "non-profit" or "not-for-profit" consistently through-out the text, • limit dispensaries and on-site or off-site cultivation facilities to industrial zoned properties only, or at least keep them off of Apache Trail; -- • require greenhouses where marijuana is being cultivated to have opaque walls and/or that lighting for greenhouses complies with dark sky and light trespass regulations, • allow manufactured buildings (such as steel buildings) to be used for marijuana cultivation, • allow for a manufactured home or RV to be used for home marijuana cultivation by a Designated Caregiver or a Qualifying Patient who lives more than 25 miles from a dispensary, • get property owner's signature/consent on a CUP application form and require that all board of directors members and dispensary agents register with our Police Department, • require a minimum separation distance of/< mile (1320 feet) between dispensaries and off-site cultivation facilities, and allow the Commission 50% reduction discretion in the spacing requirement if needed, • require that security systems at dispensaries and off-site cultivation facilities be Police and/or professionally monitored, • allow dispensaries to also sell infused products, • prohibit the marijuana leaf symbol from being used on any exterior signage, • specify that 1 dispensary and its associated on-site or off-site cultivation facility shall be allowed in the city presently, and that another dispensary may be allowed when the City has at least 20 pharmacies, and 1 for every 10 pharmacies after that; • require that a Qualifying Patient or Caregiver proposing to cultivate marijuana at home comply with any building code requirements for electric, plumbing and other improvements The attached draft language, proposing to amend the 'Definitions' and 'General Provisions and Exceptions' sections of the zoning Ordinance to accommodate medical marijuana uses is presented tonight for the Commission's review and recommendation. As usual, the proposed changes to the first draft are shown in stake-throughs and highlights. Staff will go through each item with the Commission PLANNING DIVISION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends approval of the proposed text amendments It is very important for the City to have its ordinance adopted and in effect prior to the DHS 6 having its operating procedures in place. The City can always amend the first version of the ordinance later if needed RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the (APPROVAL/DENIAL) of case AM-4-10, proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendments to regulate medical marijuana uses, amending the Apache Junction City Code, Volume II, Land Development Code, Chapter 1, Zoning Ordinance, Article 1- 5 Definitions and Article 1-6 General Provisions and Exceptions, in accordance with the following recommended language. Attachments: - Proposed Text Amendment Language, - DHS Schedule; - Public Input; - AZ Medical Marijuana Act; 7 il301 CASE AM-4-10. AMENDMENTS TO THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 1, ZONING ORDINANCE, PERTAINING TO MEDICAL MARIJUANA USES- The Apache Junction City Code, Volume II, Land Development Code, Chapter 1, Zoning Ordinance, shall be amended as follows - ARTICLE 1-5 . DEFINITIONS, Section 1-5-1 DEFINITIONS; RULES OF INTERPRETATION, Subsection (B) , shall be amended with the addition of the following- MEDICAL MARIJUANA USES . The following definitions are derived from or are taken from, in whole or in part, or relate to the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated ("ARS" ) , Title 36, Chapter 28 1) The following definitions support and supplement said act and are applicable to the definition of MEDICAL MARIJUANA USES in the City of Apache Junction- (a) CARDHOLDER. A qualifying patient, a designated caregiver or a nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary agent who has been issued and possesses a valid registry identification card (b) CULTIVATION. The process by which a person grows a marijuana plant. (c) DESIGNATED CAREGIVER A person who is at least twenty- one years of age, has agreed to assist with a patient' s medical use of marijuana, has not been convicted of an excluded felony offense, and assists no more than five qualifying patients with the medical use of marijuana (further described in ARS §36-2801 (5) and (7) ) . (d) DESIGNATED CAREGIVER CULTIVATION LOCATION An enclosed, locked facility such as a closet, room, greenhouse or other building where a designated caregiver and cardholder, whose registration card indicates that the cardholder has been authorized to cultivate marijuana plants for a qualifying patient' s medical use, as defined by A R.S . §36-2801 (b) (11) , cultivates marijuana. The designated caregiver' s cultivation location must be accessory to the designated caregiver' s primary residence . Medical marijuana cultivation as an accessory use to the designated caregiver' s primary residence must IZ - I not be detectable from the exterior of the building in which the cultivation takes place . (e) ENCLOSED LOCKED FACILITY. A closet, room, greenhouse, building or other enclosed area equipped with locks or other security devices that permit access only by a cardholder (f) MARIJUANA. All parts of any plant of the genus cannabis whether growing or not, and the seeds of such plant . (g) MEDICAL MARIJUANA All parts of the genus cannabis that may be administered to treat or alleviate a qualifying patient' s debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the patient 's debilitating medical condition (h) MEDICAL MARIJUANA INFUSION (OR MANUFACTURING) FACILITY A facility that incorporates medical marijuana (cannabis) by the means of cooking, blending, or incorporation into consumable/edible goods . (1) MEDICAL USE. The acquisition, possession, cultivation, manufacture, use, administration, delivery, transfer or transportation of marijuana or paraphernalia relating to the administration of marijuana to treat or alleviate a registered qualifying patient' s debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the patient' s debilitating medical condition (j ) NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY A nonprofit (not-for-profit) entity that acquires, possesses, cultivates, manufactures, transfers, transports, supplies, sells, gives, dispenses, or otherwise provides medical marijuana or related educational materials to cardholders Said entity may receive payment for all expenses incurred in its operation. (k) NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AGENT A principal officer, board member, employee, or volunteer of a Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary who is at least twenty-one years of age and has not been convicted of an excluded felony offense (as described in ARS §36- 2801 (7) ) (1) NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY OFF-SITE CULTIVATION FACILITY The additional location where PZ- Z 411. marijuana is cultivated by a Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary as referenced in A R S § 36- 2804 (B) (1) (b) (ii) (m) QUALIFYING PATIENT A person who has been diagnosed by a physician as having a debilitating medical condition as defined in A R S § 36-2801 (3) . (n) QUALIFYING PATIENT CULTIVATION LOCATION An enclosed, locked facility such as a closet, room, greenhouse or other building where a qualifying patient, who is also a cardholder authorized to cultivate marijuana plants, as defined by A.R.S §36-2801 (1) (a) (ii) , cultivates marijuana. The qualifying patient' s cultivation location must be accessory to the qualifying patient' s primary residence Medical marijuana cultivation as an accessory use to the qualifying patient' s primary residence must not be detectable from the exterior of the building in which the cultivation takes place, and shall only be permitted if the residence is located at least 25 miles distance from a State certified Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary (o) REGISTRY IDENTIFICATION CARD. A document issued by the Arizona Department of Health Services that identifies a person as a registered Qualifying Patient, registered Designated Caregiver or a registered Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary Agent . (p) USABLE MARIJUANA The dried flowers of the marijuana plant, and any mixture or preparation thereof, but does not include the seeds, stalks and roots of the plant and does not include the weight of any non-marijuana ingredients combined with marijuana and prepared for consumption as food or drink ARTICLE 1-6 . GENERAL PROVISIONS AND EXCEPTIONS, Section 1-6-1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, shall be amended with the addition of the following new subsection: (F) Medical Marijuana uses permitted by conditional use permit. A conditional use permit subject to the provisions of this Article, Sections 1-6-1 (A) through (D) and this subsection, shall be required for the establishment of a Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary with on-site cultivation facilities or with PZ-3 off-site cultivation facilities, for a Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-site Cultivation Facility and for a stand-alone Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Infusion Facility. (Refer to Section 1-5-1 of this Chapter for related definitions; and to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (ARS) , Title 36, Chapter 28 . 1 ARIZONA MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACT, for all definitions and statutes pertaining to medical marijuana ) (1) A Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary with or without on-site cultivation facilities shall be subject to a conditional use permit process and shall be limited to the city' s CB-2 (General Business) , C-3 (General Commercial) , C-4 (Heavy Commercial) , CI-i (Light Industry and Warehouse Zone) and CI-2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts . A Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off- site Cultivation Facility (i .e . , a cultivation facility not co-located with a dispensary) and/or a stand-alone Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Infusion Facility which serves one or more Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensaries shall be subject to a conditional use permit process and shall be limited to the city' s CI-1 and CI-2 zoning districts; except that a conditional use permit application may include a request for a dispensary and its associated off-site cultivation facility and its associated stand-alone infusion facility under the same permit Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, off- site cultivation facilities and/or infusion facilities shall not be allowed in any Planned Community District (2) Any Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary, with or without an on-site cultivation facility, Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-site Cultivation Facility and Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Infusion Facility shall be located in an enclosed locked facility, such as a permanent secure building, and not in a cargo container, RV, trailer, or motor vehicle If a green house is used as a cultivation facility, reasonable measures shall be taken to obscure the visibility of the marijuana plants from outside the building; and that the greenhouse complies with dark sky and light trespass regulations . (3) An application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary, Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-site Cultivation Facility or stand-alone Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Infusion Facility PZ-I' IN. shall include, at a minimum, the following supplemental information- (a) Signature and consent on the application form by the property owner of record that he/she is aware the property will be used for medical marijuana dispensing, cultivating or infusion; (b) A written assurance from the applicant and/or his or her agents that upon approval from DHS of the registration certificate for the Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary, Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary Off-site Cultivation Facility or stand- alone Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Infusion Facility, all Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary Agents associated with the approved facility shall register with the local Police Department; ...* (c) Application or acknowledgement to obtain a City Business or Operating License; (d) A detailed site plan and floor plan for the facility, and narrative explaining the operation of the facility and hours of operation (4) The conditions of approval which may be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in evaluating these requests, include : (a) Required spacing requirements . 1 A minimum of 1, 320 feet between dispensaries, off-site cultivation facilities or stand-alone infusion facilities, as measured from nearest building wall to nearest building wall, 2 . A minimum of 750 feet between a dispensary, off-site cultivation facility or stand-alone infusion facility and any public or private school, day care center, church, or drug and/or alcohol rehabilitation center, as measured from nearest building wall of the business to the nearest building wall of the protected use, 3 . A minimum of 750 feet from other sensitive land uses as determined by the Zoning Administrator on a case by case basis, as measured from the nearest building wall of the business to the nearest building wall of the protected use 4 . The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the authority to reduce the spacing requirements by fifty percent (500) between PZ -5 dispensaries, cultivation facilities and stand- alone infusion facilities, or between dispensaries, cultivation and stand-alone infusion facilities and the protected uses mentioned above, if circumstances warrant it, but in no case shall any dispensary, cultivation facility or infusion facility be closer than 500 feet to a public or private school . (b) Operating requirements - 1. Prohibition on drive-through pickup windows and delivery service; 2 Prohibition on outdoor seating areas at dispensaries, cultivation facilities or stand- alone infusion facilities, 3 . Security Plan including lighting, monitored alarm and/or camera surveillance systems, secure storage, and other necessary building safety measures; 4 Prohibition on on-site consumption of medical marijuana at a dispensary, cultivation facility or infusion facility, 5 Prohibition on dispensaries selling marijuana or tobacco-smoking related products such as pipes, water pipes, rolling paper, screens, vaporizers, mills, concealing devices, etc , other than cookbooks and educational materials 6 . Limit on size of facility in terms of square footage, building height or other factors to keep said facility in character with existing or planned surrounding development 7 Review of all signage which will be visible from the exterior of the facility. (c) Other conditions which the Planning and Zoning Commission may deem necessary to conserve and promote the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare, including. 1 One Nonprofit Medical Marijuana Dispensary and its associated off-site cultivation facility and/or stand-alone infusion facility shall presently be allowed in the City Another dispensary, off-site cultivation facility or stand-alone infusion facility may be allowed PZ-6 when the City has at least 20 pharmacies, and one for every ten pharmacies after that, 2 Compliance with all City-adopted zoning, landscaping, engineering, building, design guidelines, overlay district and/or planned development district requirements, 3 The Commission shall reserve the right to overturn a conditional use permit for non- compliance with any condition prescribed as part of the permit approval or if the use is demonstrated to be a nuisance or hazard to the neighborhood or community (5) In the event that a qualifying patient in the City limits lives 25 miles or farther from a dispensary, said individual or his or her designated caregiver may cultivate no more than twelve (12) marijuana plants at the place of primary residence (including a manufactured home or a recreational vehicle) of the qualifying patient, with owner' s permission if needed, without need to apply for a conditional use permit . However, said individual or his or her designated caregiver shall apply the same types of precautions as above for security, use, documentation and must advise the Chief of Police of his or her intent to cultivate marijuana at home At such time as a dispensary is located within 25 miles from the qualifying patient' s home, all cultivation of marijuana plants in the home must cease or be considered a zoning violation, among other possible local, state and federal law violations . (6) In the event that a designated caregiver whose residence is in the City limits is cultivating marijuana for the qualifying patient or patients in his or her care, and whose qualifying patient or patients in his or her care live 25 miles or farther from a dispensary, said designated caregiver may cultivate no more than twelve (12) marijuana plants per patient at the place of primary residency of the designated caregiver (including a manufactured home or a recreational vehicle) , with owner' s permission if needed, without need to apply for a conditional use permit However, said designated caregiver shall apply the same types of precautions as above for security, sue, documentation and must advise the Chief of Police of his or her intent to cultivate marijuana at home for the benefit of his or her qualifying patient or patients . At such time as a PZ.-7 Air i dispensary is located within 25 miles from the designated caregiver' s home, all cultivation of marijuana plants in the home must cease or be considered a zoning violation, among other possible local, state and federal law violations . VZ' •AC11 s ^ Am. 2 / o .. ache junction Home of t e .Superclition Aloantains '101zott Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Bryant Powell, Assistant City Manager DATE. January 31, 2011 Agenda Type Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area. Community Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: PRESENTATION ON CURRENT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT PROJECTS HAPPENING IN DOWNTOWN APACHE JUNCTION ACTION REQUESTED: Information Only (No discussion) DISCUSSION /BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Downtown Redevelopment and Implementation Strategy adopted by the city council with the approval of Resolution No. 10-34 recommends specific goals and strategies geared toward fostering revitalization in the downtown. There are a number of public and private investment projects currently underway and staff would like to provide the council with a highlight of these projects and the positive impact these investments will have on the downtown and community FISCAL IMPACT. Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES• RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download No Attachments Available