HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 06.06 City Council Work Session Agenda o uto of A ache Junctton
Home of the Superstition Mountains
4 lzo$F
�.. APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 EAST SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD
APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85219
Monday,June 6, 2011
7:00 PM
AGENPA
1 CALL TO ORDER.
2 ROLL CALL.
3 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED POLICIES GOVERNING THE CITY'S
SPONSORSHIP OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE INDIAN
COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM.
During the May 3,2011 City Council meeting,city staff was given the directive to prepare a draft of policies governing
the city's"sponsorship"of local nonprofit organizations for participation in the Indian Community State Shared
Revenue Program
4 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON POTENTIAL GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR SUBMISSION TO
THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 INDIAN
COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM.
Staff respectfully requests that the city council review and discuss potential projects to be submitted to the Gila River
Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 The deadline for submitting
applications is June 30,2011 Staff will present to council three city projects and two nonprofit projects
5. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON TERM LIFE INSURANCE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS(RFP).
Liz Riley, Human Resources Director,will provide an overview of the twelve responses to the Request for Proposal
(RFP)for term life insurance
6. DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED DOWNTOWN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT AND DESIGN GUIDELINES.
The city council will continue their discussion on the proposed Downtown Overlay Zoning District and the Downtown
Design Guidelines,which were recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 26,
2011
7 DISCUSSION ON PROCEDURES FOR JUNE 7,2011,COUNCIL MEETING.
Discussion on procedures and logistics for regular council meeting in order to effectuate council transition.
8 ADJOURNMENT.
Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may
be obtained from the City Clerk's office
300 East Superstition Boulevard,Apache Junction,AZ
Monday through Friday,8 00 a m to 5 00 p m,excluding holidays
If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation,please notify the Human
Resources Office,at(480)474-2617 or(480)983-0095(TDD)at least 72 hours prior to the
scheduled time
Is ACM
0 o A acheJunction
z :l f
Nome of the Superstition Mountains
al Print
,.. TO: City Manager's Office
FROM- Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager
DATE June 6, 2011
Agenda Type • Work Session Agenda
Council Priority Focus Area. Revenue Development
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM.
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED POLICIES GOVERNING THE CITY'S
SPONSORSHIP OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE INDIAN
COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM
ACTION REQUESTED.
Presentation and Discussion
DISCUSSION/BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
During the May 3, 2011 City Council meeting,city staff was given the directive to prepare a draft of policies
governing the city's "sponsorship"of local nonprofit organizations for participation in the Indian Community
State Shared Revenue Program
FISCAL IMPACT.
Budgetary Approval Not Required
OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council review and discuss the proposed policies At the end of
the discussion, staff respectfully requests Council's suggested changes to the policies.
ATTACHMENTS:
Click to download
D Staff Report
D Proposed Indian Community Grant Policies
O IGA Between Tribal Entity and Pass Through Municipality
O Proposed IGA Between City and Nonprofit Organization
o Proposed Council Resolution Sponsonno Nonprofit Grant Application
"ow
*304 City of Apache Junction
Development Services Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 26, 2011
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
THROUGH. George Hoffman, City Manager
Brad Steinke, Development Services Director
FROM: Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program
REQUEST
Staff respectfully requests that the City Council review and discuss the proposed
policies governing the City's "sponsorship" of local nonprofit organizations for
participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program.
BACKGROUND
During the April 18, 2011 City Council work session, City staff gave an update regarding
the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program. As noted in the presentation,
Proposition 202 stipulated that local nonprofit organizations may apply for Program
funds if"sponsored" by an appropnate municipality. The presentation included the
following topics:
1. Why municipalities sponsor nonprofit organizations for such applications;
2 How requests for sponsorship are handled;
3 Competition between City and nonprofit grant requests;
4. Costs related to sponsorship, and
5 The City's liability for sponsorship.
Council asked staff to return to a future meeting to formally seek direction regarding this
matter.
During the May 3, 2011 City Council meeting, City staff was given the directive to
prepare a draft of policies governing the City's "sponsorship" of local nonprofit
organizations for participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program.
The draft was to be presented to Council at a subsequent meeting.
DISCySSIQN
To assist in the preparation of the policies, staff consulted with. 1) other municipalities
(i.e. Mesa, Maricopa, Tempe) that sponsor nonprofit participation in the tribal grant
program, 2) the grant administrator for the Gila River Indian Community, 3) the
insurance company that provides coverage for the Friends of Apache Junction and the
Apache Junction Community Development Corporation, and 4) local nonprofits that had
previously requested sponsorship for the program (i e Empowerment Systems and
East Valley Adult Resources).
Based on these discussions, staff developed a set of policies that
1. Stipulates criteria for sponsorship,
2 Establishes a non compete criteria for sponsorship,
3 Identifies the process to be used for consideration of sponsorship requests,
4. Stipulates staff's role in the recommendation process;
5 Suggests Directors and Operators Liability Insurance for participating nonprofits;
6 Addresses the issue of administrative costs incurred by the City;
7. Addresses the issue of City liability; and
8 Addresses the issue of malfeasance by a sponsored nonprofit organization
See Attachment 1 for the draft policies
Staff also developed/secured documents that would be needed to complement the
proposed policies These documents include a.
1. Sample of an intergovernmental agreement executed between a tribal entity and
a pass through municipality.
See Attachment 2 for a copy of the intergovernmental agreement used by the
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation between itself and a pass through municipality
2. Draft intergovernmental agreement that could be used between the City and a
nonprofit when an IGA is not executed between the tribal entity and a pass
through municipality
See Attachment 3 for a copy of a proposed intergovernmental agreement
between the City of Apache Junction and a nonprofit agency receiving pass
through funds from the City.
3. Draft resolution that could be used by the City when sponsoring a nonprofit
agency
See Attachment 4 for a copy of a proposed City Council resolution authorizing
the City's sponsorship of a nonprofit organization for participation in a tribal grant
program
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully recommends that Council review and discusses the proposed policies.
Page 2
ACTION REQUIRED
Review and discuss the proposed policies. Identify changes to be made to the policies.
Attachment 1 Proposed Policies
Attachment 2' Intergovernmental Agreement Utilized by the Ft McDowell Yavapai
Nation
Attachment 3 Proposed Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Apache
Junction and a Nonprofit Organization
Attachment 4 Proposed Resolution Sponsorship a Local Nonprofit for Participation in
the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program
Page 3
IIICity Council Report: Attachment 1
AIR/ZONPP
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA
INDIAN COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM:
LOCAL NONPROFIT PARTICIPATION
As Adopted by the City Council on June 21, 2011
PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT
The purpose of this document is to delineate criteria which the City may utilize to
determine "sponsorship" of a nonprofit organization for participation in the Indian
Community State Shared Revenue Program.
BACKGROUND
In November 2002, the voters of Arizona approved Proposition 202 which initiated new
gaming compacts between the State of Anzona and the Native American communities.
An important provision of Proposition 202 was the shanng of gaming revenues with the
State. Henceforth, tribes would be assessed by the State a percentage of their gross
gaming revenue. Tribes had the option of either paying all of this assessment into a
State managed fund or to pay 88% of the assessment into the State managed fund and
retain 12% of the assessment for distribution as grants
Several Native American communities (e.g. Gila River Indian, Ak-Chin, Fort Mc Dowell
Yavapai) exercised their option to retain and administer 12% of State shared revenue.
Known as the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program, the Program makes
"Distributions to cities, towns, or counties for government services that benefit the
general public, including public safety, mitigation of the impacts of gaming, or promotion
of commerce and economic development"
Typical tribal funding priorities include. 1) public safety (police, fire, ems),
2) transportation; 3) health care services, 4) economic and/or community development,
5) education, and 6) environment
The law also stipulates that local nonprofits may submit applications to tribal entities if
the nonprofit organization is"sponsored" by an appropriate municipality. In such cases,
the municipality agrees to act as a pass through for the grant funds. The municipality
receives the grant funds from the tribal entity and in turn issues a check to the nonprofit
agency.
Pate I of 4
Communities choose to support nonprofit tribal grant applications because' 1) the law
stipulates this role for municipalities, 2) it is a way to address local needs that
government cannot (e g social services), 3) it is a way to assist local nonprofits, and 4)
it is considered being a "good neighbor"
Some tribal entities formalize the relationship between themselves and the pass through
municipality by using an Intergovernmental Agreement (e.g. Fort Mc Dowell Yavapai
Nation) See Addendum 1.
Other tribal communities (e.g. Gila River Indian Community) do not formalize this
relationship rather they encourage the pass through municipality and the nonprofit
organization to develop their own contractual agreement if so desired. See Addendum 2
for a sample Intergovernmental Agreement that the City could utilize
CRITERIA
I CONSIDERATION FOR SPONSORSHIP
An organization may be considered for sponsorship by the City Council if it is legally
recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as a 501 (c) 3 organization, is in good
standing in the City (e g current business license), provides a service to the residents of
Apache Junction, and has a physical presence in the community (e g. branch office,
satellite office)
II NON COMPETE
An organization may be considered for sponsorship if its grant application is not
determined by City staff to be in competition with an application to be submitted by the
City to the same tribal community during the same funding cycle
III PROCESS TO BE UTILIZED
a Grant Initiated by Nonprofit Organization
An organization wishing to be sponsored by the City should initiate contact with the
City's Revenue Resources Manager The organization will provide information as
requested by the Manager in a timely fashion so that the necessary City Council reports
may be prepared
The Revenue Resources Manager will present to the City Council a report summarizing
the organizations seeking sponsorship, the projects to be funded, and a
recommendation on whether or not to sponsor the agency This information will be
presented to the City Council during regularly scheduled work session(s) and City
Council Meeting(s)
The ultimate decision on sponsorship rests with the City Council As directed by the
Page 2 of 4
tribal communities, sponsorship will be determined by the adoption of a City Council
resolution authorizing the submission of the grant application under the auspices of
Apache Junction See Addendum 3 for a sample resolution.
b Grant Initiated by an Indian Community
Some Indian Communities accept grant applications only by invitation (e g Salt River
Pima-Maricopa Indian Community). In such cases, the Indian Community requests a
nonprofit to submit a grant application that addresses a priority area of the Community,
such applications still must be submitted through a sponsoring municipality
If a nonprofit is requested by an Indian Community to submit a grant application that will
address a need of the residents of Apache Junction, the City's Revenue Resources
Manager will work with the Indian Community and the City Council to facilitate the
honoring of that request
IV STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City staff will meet with an agency requesting sponsorship to determine if the agency. 1)
serves Apache Junction residents, 2) addresses an identified community need, 3)
maintains necessary City registration(s); and 4) maintains Directors and Operators
Insurance coverage (See Section V). Based upon this information, staff will prepare a
recommendation of sponsor/do not sponsor and submit to the City Council for
consideration
V DIRECTORS AND OPERATORS LIABILITY INSURANCE
It is a good business practice for a nonprofit to maintain a Directors and Operators
Liability Insurance Policy as part of its insurance package Such a policy protects the
agency against allegations of wrongful acts or decisions that result in a financial loss
Nonprofit agencies seeking "sponsorship" by the City are encouraged to maintain such
a policy and to name the City of Apache Junction as a co-insured An agency's
financial inability to maintain such a policy will not eliminate an organization from
consideration for sponsorship
VI ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
The City will incur some administrative costs (e g staff time) for sponsoring a nonprofit
organization City staff will discuss with representatives of the nonprofit organization
these costs and the possible reimbursement of them Inability to reimburse the City for
these administrative costs will not eliminate an organization from consideration for
sponsorship.
Page 3 of 4
VII LIABILITY
As noted earlier, some tribal entities execute Intergovernmental Agreements ("IGAs")
between itself and the pass through municipalities Such IGAs typically have language
which holds the municipalities harmless for any malfeasances with the funds to be
granted. When possible, the City will execute an IGA with the tribal community. See
Attachment 1
When an IGA is not utilized by the funder, the City will execute an IGA with the nonprofit
receiving funds See Addendum 2
VIII MALFEASANCE
Because its role is limited to that of a financial pass through, the City has no
responsibility for the re-cooping of grant funds or the pursuit of legal remedies should
malfeasance by the funded nonprofit organization occur during the life of a grant
contract Financial malfeasance would be covered by a standard Directors and
Operators Liability Insurance Policy. Malfeasance on the part of a nonprofit organization
will preclude City sponsorship in future funding cycles
Page 4 of 4
City Council Report. Attachment 2
Addendum 1
Intergovernmental Agreement
Between
The City of Mesa and The Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
To
Provide Funds For Promoting Tourism and other Public Programs
in the City of Mesa
And
Surrounding Communities
Pursuant To A Tribal Revenue Sharing Agreement
Authorized By
Section 12 Payment of Regulatory Costs; Tribal Contributions
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation and State of Arizona
Gaming Compact 2002,
And
Aft
A.R.S. §5-601.02
Fort McDowell,Arizona
674966 1
Intergovernmental Agreement
Between
The City of Mesa and The Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation to
Provide Funds for Promoting Tourism,Education and other Public Programs
in the City of Mesa and Surrounding Communities
This Intergovernmental Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Mesa,
an Arizona municipal corporation (the "City") and the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation(the "Nation"), a
Federally-Recognized Indian Tribe, pursuant to Section 12 Payment of Regulatory Costs, Tribal
Contributions ("Section 12") of the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation and State of Arizona Gaming
Compact 2002 (the"Compact")and A.R.S. §5-601 02.
Recitals
A. The City and Nation may enter into an agreement with one another for the distribution of 12% of the
Nation's annual contribution under Section 12(b)(1) of the Compact to cities, towns, or counties that
benefit the general public or promote commerce and economic development and pursuant to A R S §
5-601 02
B The Nation is authorized by Section 13(A)(15) of Article V, Legislative Branch, of the Constitution
of the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation to consult, negotiate, contract and conclude and perform
agreements with Federal, state, local governments and Indian tribes, as well as any person,
association, partnership,corporation,government or other private entity.
C The City is authorized by A R S §§ 5-601 02 and 11-952 to enter into agreements with Indian Tribes
for the purpose of accepting distributions to cities, towns or counties for governmental services that
benefit the general public, including public safety, mitigation of impacts of gaming, or promotion of
commerce and economic development.
D. The City and Nation desire to enter into this Agreement to provide funds for the purpose of promoting
education to benefit the general public in the State of Arizona and specifically the City of Mesa and
surrounding communities, as designated by the Nation, hereinafter referred to as the "Designated
Projects", as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference. ,^
E The City and Nation desire to enter into this Agreement to define the terms and conditions of the
Nations' funding of the Designated Projects
F The total cost of the Designated Projects is One Hundred Ten Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Four
dollars and zero cents($110,184 00)
G The$110,184.00 is hereby made available for the Designated Projects from revenue generated by the
Nation's Gaming Enterprise also known as the Fort McDowell Casino
H The Nation intends to provide $110,184 00 (the "Funds"), which represents a portion of its
contribution pursuant to a Tribal Revenue Sharing Agreement authorized by Section 12 of the
Compact and A.R.S. § 5-601 02 to complete the Designated Projects.
674966 I
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein, and the
covenants and promises set forth below,the Nation and the City,hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Designated Projects. The Designated Projects consist of the Nation providing the Funds to entities
within the City of Mesa to promote education, public safety and for the benefit of the general public
.•. in the City of Mesa and surrounding area,as identified in the attached Exhibit A.
2 Disbursement of Funds. Promptly after receipt of the Funds from the Nation, the City shall send a
payment to such Designated Entity in the amount of the payment received from the Nation.
3. Consideration and Reliance. The Nation expressly acknowledges that the City's promise to accept
and disburse to the Designated Entities all Funds received by the City pursuant to this Agreement is
full and adequate consideration and shall render this promise to provide funding irrevocable, and this
Agreement shall constitute a binding obligation of the Nation under applicable law.
4. Limited Duties of City. The Nation further expressly agrees that, except as specifically set forth in
this Agreement, the City has no duties under or related to this Agreement other than to receive the
Funds and deliver same to the Designated Entities,selection of Designated Entities and determination
as to the amount of funding are solely at the discretion of the Nation. The Parties agree that there are
no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement.
5. Financing;Verification of Payment.
A. Nation Deposit The Nation shall deposit with the City the amount of$110,184 00 within thirty
(30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreement to be disbursed according the Designated
Project amounts in Exhibit A.
B. Verification of Payment. At the request of the Nation, the City shall provide a verification of
payment to the Designated Entities The City's responsibility is limited to disbursement to each
Designated Entity and the City has no further duty with regard to any third parties, provided that
the disbursement is complete
6 Inspection and Audit. To ensure compliance with the City's limited duties herein, the Nation may
inspect any and all records maintained by the City with respect to the Designated Project upon seven
(7) days prior, written notice to the City This Section 6 shall survive termination, cancellation, or
revocation,whether whole or in part,of this Agreement for a period of one(1)year following the date
of such termination,cancellation,or revocation.
7 Term and Termination of Agreement.
A. Effective Date This Agreement shall be effective on the date it is signed by the Nation's
authorized representative
B. Term. This Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall terminate when the
funds have been received by the City and disbursed to the Designated Entities.
C Termination. The Nation may terminate this Agreement with or without cause at any time prior
to providing payment to the City, provided that such notice shall be in writing and delivered to
the parties' designated representatives,as set forth in the Notice section
674966 I
2
w^
8 Indemnification
A Indemnification Each party shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party, its
governing body, officers, departments, employees and agents from and against any and all suits,
actions, legal or administrative proceedings, claims, demands, liens, losses, fines or penalties,
damages, liability, interest, attorney's, consultant's, and accountant's fees or costs and expenses
of whatsoever kind and nature, resulting from or arising out of the negligence or willful
misconduct of the indemnifying party, its employees or agents in performing the duties set forth
in this Agreement.
B. No Liability for Other Parry's Debts and Obligations Neither party shall be liable for any debts,
accounts, obligations, nor other liabilities whatsoever of the other, including and without
limitation the other parry's obligation to withhold employment and income taxes for itself or any
of its employees
C Severability This Section 8 shall survive termination,cancellation,or revocation,whether whole
or in part, of this Agreement for a period of one (1) year from the date of such termination,
cancellation or revocation unless a timely claim is filed under A R.S § 12-821 01, in which case
this Section 8 shall remain in effect for each claim and/or lawsuit filed thereafter,but in no event
shall this Section 8 survive more than five(5)years from the date of termination, cancellation or
revocation of this Agreement
9 Interpretation of Agreement
A Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
pertaining to the subject matter contained herein, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements
and understandings,oral or written,are hereby superseded and merged herein
B. Amendment This Agreement shall not be modified, amended, altered, or changed except by
written agreement signed by both parties
C Construction and Interpretation All provisions of this Agreement shall be construed to be
consistent with the intention of the parties as expressed in the recitals contained herein
D Relationship of the Parties Neither party shall be deemed to be an employee or agent of the
other party to this Agreement
E. Days. Days shall mean calendar days
F. Severability In the event that any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof is
declared invalid or void by statute or judicial decision, such action shall have no effect on other
provisions and their application which can be given effect without the invalid or void provision or
application, and to this extent the provisions of the Agreement are severable. In the event that
any provision of the Agreement is declared invalid or void, the parties agree to meet promptly
upon request of the other party in an attempt to reach an agreement on a substitute provision
10 Waiver Waiver or delay in enforcement by either party of any breach of a term, covenant, or
condition contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any other term,covenant,or condition,or
any subsequent breach of the same or any other term,covenant,or condition contained herein
674966 I
3
11 Notification Any notice, communication, or modification shall be given in writing and shall be
given by registered or certified mail or in person to the following individuals The date of receipt of
such notices shall be the date the notice shall be deemed to have been given.
For the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
Raphael R Bear,President Drew Ryce, General Counsel
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
.•. P O Box 17779 P O Box 17779
Fountain Hills,AZ 85269 Fountain Hills, AZ 85269
For the City of Mesa
Christopher J Brady Mesa City Attorney's Office
City Manager Attn City Attorney
P 0 Box 1466 P 0 Box 1466
Mesa,AZ 85211-1466 Mesa,AZ 85211-1466
12 Assignment and Delegation Neither party shall assign nor delegate any of its rights, interest,
obligations, covenants, or performance under this Agreement Any termination shall not relieve
either party from liabilities or costs already incurred under this Agreement.
13 Non-Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Nothing in this Agreement, Exhibit A or the Funding
Agreements shall be construed to waive the Sovereign Immunity of the Nation
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
Amok
674966 I
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The City of Mesa has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be
executed by the City Manager, upon resolution of the City Council and attested to by the Clerk of the
City, and the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation has caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be
executed by the Nation's Tnbal Council and attested to by its Tnbal Secretary
This Agreement is effective upon signature of a duly appointed representative of the Fort McDowell
Yavapai Nation
ATTEST. FORT MCDOWELL YAVAPAI NATION
Pansy Thomas, Secretary Raphael R Bear
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation President,Tnbal Council
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
Date
ATTEST CITY OF MESA
Linda Crocker,Clerk Christopher J. Brady,City Manager
City of Mesa,Arizona City of Mesa,Arizona
Date
674966 I
5
The undersigned attorney acknowledges that he has reviewed the above Agreement on behalf of the
FORT MCDOWELL YAVAPAI NATION,and has determined that this Agreement is in proper form and
that execution hereof is within the powers and authonty granted under the Constitution of the Fort
McDowell Yavapai Nation, Section 13(A)(15), Article V Legislative Branch, as adopted October 19,
1999 and approved by the U S Deputy Commissioner of Indian Affairs November 12, 1999. This
acknowledgement shall not constitute nor be construed as a waiver of the Sovereign Immunity of the Fort
McDowell Yavapai Nation
OIN
Drew Ryce,General Counsel Date
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation
In accordance with the requirements of A R.S. § 11-952(D), the undersigned attorney acknowledges that
(i)he has reviewed the above Agreement on behalf of the CITY OF MESA and(u)as to the City of Mesa
only,has determined that this Agreement is in proper form and that execution hereof is within the powers
and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona
Mesa City Attorney Date
674966 1
6
11 *..
EXHIBIT A
DESIGNATED PROJECTS
Entity Purpose Award Contact
City of Mesa School District $71,000 00 Jerry Dillehay
(Fremont Jr $20,500) City Of Mesa,Grants Coord
(Red Mountain H.S.$15,500.00) 480-644-4202 .•�
(Salk Elementary$35,000)
Dr Debra Duvall
Superintendent Mesa Schools
63 E main St #101
Mesa AZ 85201
480-472-0000
City of Mesa Public Safety $5000 00 Jerry Dillehay
Fire Department
City of Mesa Public Benefit $20,000 00 Chris Scarpati
Child Crisis Center Child Crisis Center
817 N Country Club Drive
Mesa, AZ 85201
480-834-9492
City of Mesa Public Benefit $14,184 00 Jerry Dillehay
Mesa Art Center
Am Indian Art Ctr.
TOTAL $110,184 00
.o.
674966 1
City Council Report: Attachment 3
Addendum 2
When recorded return to.
Richard Joel Stern, Esq.
Apache Junction City Attorney
300 East Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION AND EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as
of the day of 20_, by and between CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, an Arizona municipal corporation ("City") and East Valley Adult
Resources, a nonprofit agency ("EVAR"). City and EVAR are sometimes
referred to herein collectively as the "Parties," or individually as a "Party "
RECITALS
• EVAR, serving Apache Junction residents, is a nonprofit
organization which provides social, recreational, fitness, advocacy, and
transportation services at the Apache Junction Active Adult Center.
• EVAR desires to utilize funds provided by the Gila River Indian
Community to provide transportation services in Apache Junction
• The Gila River Indian Community ("GRIC") desires to convey to
Apache Junction a portion of its annual 12% local revenue-sharing contribution
required to be paid to local governments for the benefit of the general public in
-- accordance with the Tribal-State Gaming Compact executed by and between
GRIC and the State of Arizona in 2003, and pursuant to A.R.S. § 5-601.02, for
disbursement by Apache Junction to EVAR.
• Apache Junction desires to disburse the aforementioned
contribution to the EVAR and to set forth the mutual understandings between
Apache Junction and EVAR.
• The City has the desire and the ability to assist EVAR
• There is a need for mutual cooperation for a pass through of grant
funds from the Gila River Community to the City of Apache Junction and
ultimately to East Valley Adult Resources.
• Mutual cooperation would result in EVAR's obtaining assistance
from City, which translates to public savings.
1
• EVAR is authorized to contract with cities and towns and to provide
programming and transportation to the senior citizen population of the East
Valley pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-1441 et seq.
• The Parties have mutual interests in this project and wish to enter
into this Agreement with certain terms and conditions.
AGREEMENT —.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the
mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, and for other consideration,
the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree
as follows.
1. ACCURACY OF THE RECITALS: The Parties hereby confirm the
accuracy of the Recitals set forth above, which are incorporated
herein by this reference.
2. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS:
City agrees to do all of the following:
a. Disburse the aforementioned contribution to EVAR.
b. Review copies of all reports and documents sent to the Gila
River Indian Community by EVAR related to funded project.
c.
3. EVAR'S OBLIGATIONS.
EVAR agrees to do all of the following: -'
a Hold harmless the City of Apache Junction and its agents
b. Provide to the City of Apache Junction a copy of all reports and
documents sent to the Gila River Indian Community related to
funded project.
c.
4. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights
and responsibilities of the Parties with respect to the acceptance and
distribution of the contribution to EVAR.
2
5. Funding Schedule. GRIC shall deliver a one-time payment of
$45,000 to the City of Apache Junction for disbursement to EVAR for the
provision of transportation services at the Apache Junction Active Adult Center
("Center"). The purpose of the contribution is to provide Apache Junction
residents with transportation to: the Center, Center Programs, local medical
appointments, and local shopping hubs.
6. Term. The term of this Agreement shall begin on the date of
execution and shall terminate when Apache Junction has disbursed the
contribution to EVAR.
7. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. EVAR shall indemnify, defend
and hold harmless Apache Junction its governing body, departments, officials,
employees and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or
administrative proceedings, claims, demands, liens, losses, fines or penalties,
damages, liability, interest, fees for attorneys, consultants and accountants or
costs and expenses of any kind and nature, resulting from or arising out of the
negligence or willful misconduct of Apache Junction, its governing body,
departments, employees and agents in performing the duties set forth in this
Agreement.
8. Transactional Conflicts of Interest. Each Party acknowledges that
this Agreement is subject to cancellation pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. §
38-511.
9 Waiver. No waiver, whether written or tacit, of any remedy or
provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other
provision hereof or a permanent waiver of the provision concerned, unless
otherwise stated in writing by the Party to be bound thereby.
10. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be found
invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in
effect and be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
11. NOTICES. Except as otherwise required by law, any notice required
or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by
personal delivery, or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered,
return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the Parties at their
respective addresses set forth below, or at such other address as a Party may
designate in writing pursuant to the terms of this Section, or by telecopy or
telefacsimile machine, or by any nationally recognized express or overnight
delivery service (e.g. Federal Express or UPS), delivery charges prepaid:
3
If to City: City of Apache Junction
Attn: City Manager
300 E. Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, Arizona 85119-2899
Telephone: (480) 474-5066
Facsimile: (480) 474-5110
With a copy to: City of Apache Junction
Attn: City Attorney —
300 E. Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, Arizona 85119-2899
Telephone• (480) 474-2604
Facsimile: (480) 982-5883
If to EVAR: East Valley Adult Resources
Attn: Executive Director
45 West University
Suite A - Mesa, Arizona 85201
Telephone: (480) 964-9014
Facsimile: (480)898-7306
With a copy to:
Telephone: ( ) -
Facsimile: ( ) -
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of
the date first set forth above.
EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES, an Arizona
nonprofit organization
By• Mary Turley
Its. President, Board of Directors
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, an
Arizona municipal corporation
By: John S. Insalaco
Its: Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Kathy Connelly, City Clerk
5
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
County of )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
, 20_, by [Name], [Title] of [Other Agency], an Arizona
[description of agency].
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
(seal)
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2010, by John S. Insalaco, the Mayor of City of Apache
Junction, Arizona, an Arizona municipal corporation, who acknowledged that he
signed the foregoing instrument on behalf of City.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
(seal)
6
COUNSEL APPROVAL AS TO FORM•
I have read this Agreement and have determined such Agreement is in proper
form and is entered into within the powers of and authority granted under the
laws of the State of Arizona.
-- , EVAR Attorney Date
I have read this Agreement and have determined such Agreement is in proper
form and is entered into within the powers of and authority granted under the
laws of the State of Arizona.
Richard J. Stern, City Attorney Date
7
EXHIBIT A
[TITLE OF EXHIBIT A]
1
Aambk
EXHIBIT B
[TITLE OF EXHIBIT B]
1
City Council Report: Attachment 4
Addendum 3
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL
OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN
COMMUNITY FOR PROPOSITION 202 FUNDS . SAID APPLICATION
IS SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ON BEHALF
OF EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES .
WHEREAS, in 2002, Proposition 202 authorized new gaming
compacts between the State of Arizona and Arizona Indian Tribes
which included sharing of gaming revenues; and
WHEREAS, a portion of this state-shared revenue in an
amount of 12% can be retained by an Indian Tribe and distributed
to cities, towns or counties for government services that. 1)
benefit the general public; 2) mitigate the impacts of gaming;
and/or 3) promote commerce and economic development, and
WHEREAS, private, not-for-profit organizations wishing to
access Proposition 202 funding to provide public benefits must
secure sponsorship from a city, town or county before making
application. Said sponsorship must be expressed in a resolution
passed by the local government sponsor.
WHEREAS, the Gila Indian Community (the "Community") has
decided to exercise its option to retain and administer the 12%
share itself and has adopted guidelines and procedures for this
new program; and
WHEREAS, the Community developed an expanded list of
"priority areas" for which funding will be concentrated,
including public safety, transportation, healthcare services,
economic development, and education.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS .
RESOLUTION NO 11-31
PAGE 1 OF 3
ON ^
Section 1.
Staff is authorized to submit an application, on behalf of East
Valley Adult Resources, to the Gila River Indian Community for
Proposition 202 funds, and the Mayor is authorized to sign the
application, contracts and grant documents for receipt and
distribution of the Proposition 202 funds for the operation of
the transportation program at the Apache Junction Active Adult
Center in an amount not to exceed $45, 000.
Section 2 :
Staff is directed to execute an Intergovernmental Agreement
between the City of Apache Junction and the East Valley Adult
Resources Board of Directors for use of the funds if the grant
is awarded.
Section 3:
The Mayor is authorized to take any and all actions necessary to
implement and complete the activities submitted in the
application
Section 4 .
The City Manager or his or her designee is hereby authorized to
take whatever steps necessary to administer and procure the
funding.
Section 5.
The City has no duties under or related to this resolution other
than to receive the funds and deliver same to East Valley Adult
Resources; the determination as to the amount of funding is
solely at the discretion of the Gila River Indian Community. All
parties agree there are no third-party beneficiaries to this
document.
Section 6-
If awarded funding, East Valley Adult Resources will provide the
City of Apache Junction copies of all reports and documents
related to the project funded by the Gila River Indian
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 2 OF 3
ems
Community.
Section 7 :
The City Council supports this grant request for funding and if
awarded will administer the funds directly to East Valley Adult
Resources as a pass through grant.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 2011
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2011 .
JOHN S . INSALACO
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
RICHARD J STERN
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 3 OF 3
Q,QpCHF�
���
' .., "4.0 z City ofApache V Junction
Rizot Development Services Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 3, 2011
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager
SUBJECT: City Council Work Session
June 6, 2011
Agenda Item Number 3 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION
ON PROPOSED POLICIES GOVERNING THE CITY'S
SPONSORSHIP OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FOR
PARTICIPATION IN THE INDIAN COMMUNITY STATE SHARED
REVENUE PROGRAM
Attached are amended versions of the following documents contained in the staff report.
• City Council Report Attachment 3 (Proposed Intergovernmental Agreement
Between the City of Apache Junction and a Nonprofit Organization); and
• City Council Report. Attachment 4 (Proposed Resolution Sponsorship a Local
Nonprofit for Participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue
Program).
The amended documents were not prepared in time for inclusion in the Council packet
The amended documents supersede the corresponding documents contained in the
Council packet and will be reviewed and discussed during the June 6, 2011 Council
work session
Please accept staff's apologies for any inconvenience or confusion this may have
caused
Thank you
City Council Report: Attachment 3
Addendum 2
When recorded return to:
Richard Joel Stern, Esq.
Apache Junction City Attorney
300 East Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
GRANT PASS THROUGH AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION AND EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES
THIS GRANT PASS THROUGH AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as
of the day of 20 , by and between CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, an Arizona municipal corporation ("City") and East Valley Adult
Resources, a nonprofit agency ("EVAR"). City and EVAR are sometimes
referred to herein collectively as the "Parties," or individually as a "Party."
RECITALS
A. EVAR is a nonprofit organization which provides social,
recreational, fitness, advocacy, and transportation services at the Apache
Junction Active Adult Center for Apache Junction residents.
B. EVAR desires to utilize Gila River Indian Community funds for
transportation services in Apache Junction
C. The Gila River Indian Community ("GRIC") desires to convey to City
a portion of its annual 12% local revenue-sharing contribution required to
be paid to local governments for the benefit of the general public in
accordance with the Tribal-State Gaming Compact executed by and
between GRIC and the State of Arizona in 2003, and pursuant to A.R.S. §
5-601.02, for disbursement by City to EVAR.
D. City desires to disburse the aforementioned contribution to the
EVAR and to set forth the mutual understandings between City and EVAR.
E. There is a need for mutual cooperation for a pass through of grant
funds from GRIC to City and ultimately to East Valley Adult Resources
F. Mutual cooperation would result in EVAR's obtaining assistance
from City, which translates to public savings.
1
G. The Parties have mutual interests in this project and wish to enter
into this Agreement with certain terms and conditions.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the
mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, and for other consideration,
the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree
as follows:
1. ACCURACY OF THE RECITALS: The Parties hereby confirm the
accuracy of the Recitals set forth above, which are incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS:
City agrees to do all of the following
a. Disburse the aforementioned GRIC contribution to EVAR.
b Review copies of all reports and documents sent to the Gila
River Indian Community by EVAR related to funded project
3 EVAR'S OBLIGATIONS.
EVAR agrees to do all of the following:
a. Hold harmless the City of Apache Junction and its agents for any
acts or omissions by City, its elected officials, appointees, and employees.
b. Provide to the City of Apache Junction a copy of all reports and
documents sent to the GRIC related to funded project no later than 30 days after
their submission to GRIC
4. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights
and responsibilities of the Parties with respect to the acceptance and
distribution of the contribution to EVAR
5. Funding Schedule. GRIC shall deliver a one-time payment of
$45,000 to the City for disbursement to EVAR for the provision of transportation
services at the Apache Junction Active Adult Center ("Center"). The purpose of
the contribution is to provide City residents with transportation to the Center,
Center Programs, local medical appointments, and local shopping hubs
6. Term. The Term of this Agreement is one calendar year from the
execution date
7. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. EVAR shall indemnify, defend
and hold harmless the City, its Mayor and City Council, appointees, employees
and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative
proceedings, claims, demands, liens, losses, fines or penalties, damages,
liability, interest, fees for attorneys, consultants and accountants or costs and
expenses of any kind and nature, resulting from or arising out of the negligence
or willful misconduct of City, its Mayor and City Council, appointees, employees
and agents in performing the duties set forth in this Agreement.
8. Transactional Conflicts of Interest. The Parties acknowledge that
this Agreement is subject to cancellation pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. §
38-511
9. Waiver. No waiver, whether written or tacit, of any remedy or
provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other
provision hereof or a permanent waiver of the provision concerned, unless
otherwise stated in writing by the Party to be bound thereby.
10. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be found
invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in
effect and be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
11 No Third Party Beneficiary Rights The Parties agree that no third
party rights attach to this agreement.
12. NOTICES: Except as otherwise required by law, any notice required
or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by
personal delivery, or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered,
return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the Parties at their
respective addresses set forth below, or at such other address as a Party may
designate in writing pursuant to the terms of this Section, or by telecopy or
telefacsimile machine, or by any nationally recognized express or overnight
delivery service (e.g. Federal Express or UPS), delivery charges prepaid:
If to City City of Apache Junction
Attn: City Manager
300 E. Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, Arizona 85119-2899
Telephone: (480) 474-5066
Facsimile: (480) 474-5110
If to EVAR• East Valley Adult Resources
Attn: Executive Director
3
45 West University
Suite A - Mesa, Arizona 85201
Telephone: (480) 964-9014
Facsimile: (480)898-7306
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of
the date first set forth above.
EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES, an Arizona
nonprofit organization
By Mary Turley
Its: President, Board of Directors
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, an
Arizona municipal corporation
By: John S. Insalaco
Its: Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Kathy Connelly, City Clerk
APPROVE AS TO FORM:
By:
Richard J Stern, City Attorney
4
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
County of )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
, 20 , by [Name], [Title] of [Other Agency], an Arizona
[description of agency].
Notary Public
My Commission Expires-
(seal)
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2010, by John S. Insalaco, the Mayor of City of Apache
Junction, Arizona, an Arizona municipal corporation, who acknowledged that he
signed the foregoing instrument on behalf of City.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires
(seal)
5
City Council Report: Attachment 4
Addendum: 3
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL
OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN
COMMUNITY FOR PROPOSITION 202 FUNDS.
WHEREAS, in 2002, Proposition 202 authorized new gaming
compacts between the State of Arizona and Arizona Indian Tribes
which included sharing of gaming revenues; and
WHEREAS, a portion of this state-shared revenue in an
amount of 12% can be retained by an Indian Tribe and distributed
to cities, towns or counties for government services that: 1)
benefit the general public; 2) mitigate the impacts of gaming;
and/or 3) promote commerce and economic development; and
WHEREAS, private, not-for-profit organizations wishing to
access Proposition 202 funding to provide public benefits must
secure sponsorship from a city, town or county before making
application. Said sponsorship must be expressed in a resolution
passed by the local government sponsor.
WHEREAS, the Gila Indian Community (the "Community") has
decided to exercise its option to retain and administer the 12%
share itself and has adopted guidelines and procedures for this
new program; and
WHEREAS, the Community developed an expanded list of
"priority areas" for which funding will be concentrated,
including public safety, transportation, healthcare services,
economic development, and education.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 :
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 1 OF 3
Staff is authorized to submit an application, on behalf of East
Valley Adult Resources, to the Gila River Indian Community for
Proposition 202 funds, and the Mayor is authorized to sign the
application, contracts and grant documents for receipt and
distribution of the Proposition 202 funds for the operation of
the transportation program at the Apache Junction Active Adult
Center in an amount not to exceed $45, 000.
Section 2:
The Mayor is authorized to execute a Grant Pass Through
Agreement between the City of Apache Junction and the East
Valley Adult Resources Board of Directors for use of the funds
if the grant is awarded.
Section 3:
The Mayor is authorized to take any and all actions necessary to
implement and complete the activities submitted in the
application.
Section 4 :
The City Manager or his or her designee is hereby authorized to
take whatever steps necessary to administer and procure the
funding.
Section 5:
The City has no duties under or related to this resolution other
than to receive the funds and deliver same to East Valley Adult
Resources, the determination as to the amount of funding is
solely at the discretion of the Gila River Indian Community. All
parties agree there are no third-party beneficiaries to this
document.
Section 6.
If awarded funding, East Valley Adult Resources will provide the
City of Apache Junction copies of all reports and documents
related to the protect funded by the Gila River Indian
Community.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 2 OF 3
Section 7 :
The City Council supports this grant request for funding and if
awarded will administer the funds directly to East Valley Adult
Resources as a pass through grant.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 2011 .
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2011 .
JOHN S. INSALACO
Mayor
ATTEST :
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RICHARD J. STERN
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 3 OF 3
rpACH 44
1
City of Apache Junction
Home of the Superstition Mountains
AS Print
TO: City Manager's Office
FROM. Roger S.Hacker,Revenue Resources Manager
DATE. June 6,2011
Agenda Type. Work Session Agenda
Council Priority Focus Area: Revenue Development
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM-
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON POTENTIAL GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR SUBMISSION TO THE
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 INDIAN
COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM
ACTION REQUESTED:
Presentation and Discussion
DISCUSSION/BACKGROUND INFORMATION.
Staff respectfully requests that the city council review and discuss potential projects to be submitted to the Gila
River Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 The deadline for submitting
applications is June 30, 2011. Staff will present to council three city projects and two nonprofit projects
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budgetary Approval Not Required
�► OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council review and discuss the potential projects and then indicate
to staff which project(s) should move forward in the application process
ATTACHMENTS:
Click to download
U Staff Report
U Children's Health Outreach Coalition
t] Electronic Community Message Marquee
U Fit Families
U Maior Crimes Evidence Recovery Squad
U Senior Transportation Proaram
Agn
P A f
•
: .. City of Apache Junction
4A' ° P Department of Public Safety
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 26,2011
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: George Hoffman,City Manager
Brad Steinke, Development Services Director
FROM: Roger S Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager
SUBJECT: Gila River Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program Grant
Application For Fiscal Year 2011-2012.
REOUEST
Staff respectfully requests that the City Council review and discuss potential projects to be
submitted to the Gila River Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program for Fiscal Year
2011-2012 funding Please see Attachments 1-5 for summaries of the proposed projects.
At the end of the discussion, staff respectfully requests an indication of which project(s)to move
forward in the application process. The resolutions for the selected projects, a mandated part of
the Gila River application,will be presented to the Council during the June 20,2011 and June
21, 2011 Council meetings
BACKGROUND
Amok
Gila Community
In November 2002, the voters of Arizona approved Proposition 202 which initiated new gaming
compacts between the State of Arizona and the Native American tribes An important provision
of Proposition 202 was the sharing of gaming revenues with the State. Henceforth,tribes would
be assessed by the State a percentage of their gross gaming revenue. Tribes had the option of
either paying all of this assessment into a State managed fund or to pay 88%of the assessment
into the State managed fund and retain 12%of the assessment for distribution as grants.
The Gila River Indian Community("GRIC")exercised its option to retain and administer 12%of
State shared revenue. Known as the Gila River Indian Community State Shared Revenue
Program,the Program makes"Distributions to cities,towns, or counties for government services
that benefit the general public, including public safety, mitigation of the impacts of gaming, or
promotion of commerce and economic development" Gila River's policy is to generally limit
the distributions to cities,towns, and counties in Maricopa and Pinal Counties. Funding priorities
/Mk.
...
include. 1) Public Safety(police, fire, EMS); 2) Transportation Facilities, 3) Health Care
Services, 4) Economic Development, and 5) Education.
The law also stipulates that local nonprofits may submit applications to tribal entities if the
nonprofit organization is"sponsored" by an appropriate municipality. In such cases, the
municipality agrees to act as a conduit for the grant funds. The municipality receives the grant
funds from the tribal entity and in turn issues a check to the nonprofit agency.
Since the inception of the grant program, the City has received funding from GRIC for two
public safety projects. $77,958 to purchase an automated fingerprinting identification system
(2006) and $62,702 to purchase equipment to be used in Operation DUI Purge(2007)
Public safety projects not funded include the purchase of a Fire Arms Training System (2008);
eight mobile data terminals (2009), and three mobile data terminals (2010)
City of Apache Junction
Since the inception of the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program, the City has
received four requests for nonprofit sponsorship Each time, the City opted not to sponsor
nonprofits for tribal grant submissions for a variety of reasons Instead, the City has exclusively
submitted grant applications for City public safety projects.
Given the impact that the current economic situation has had on nonprofit agencies, Arizona
nonprofits have lost an average of 20%of their income over the last two years while the demand
for services has increased dramatically, and the fact that Gila River has indicated it will have
considerably more funds for its grant program, staff thought it an opportune time to discuss with
the City Council the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program.
In April and May 2011, City staff discussed with the Council the possibility of the City
sponsoring nonprofit organizations for submission of grant applications to tribal entities. On May
3, 2011 the City Council directed staff to present a set of policies to govern such sponsorships
.•. The first review of these policies is to occur during the June 6, 2011 work session
DISCUSSION
This year, staff is forwarding to the City Council for consideration a mixture of projects from the
City(3) and local nonprofits(2)
The nonprofit projects are forwarded with the understanding that the Council will discuss the
policy of sponsoring such applications earlier in the June 6, 2011 work session Nonprofit
applicants understand that their applications may not move forward in the application process
Page 2
wolik
Projects for consideration by Council include
Project Amount Requested GRIC Priority
Children's Health Outreach Coalition $50,000 health
Electronic Community Message Marquee $50,000 economic development .�.
Fit Families $35,900 education, health,transport
Major Crimes Evidence Recovery Squad $38,919 public safety
Senior Transportation Program $45,000 transportation
City projects (Electronic Community Message Marquee, Fit Families, Major Crimes Evidence
Recovery Squad)were submitted by City staff with the approval of Department/Division
Directors
Nonprofit projects(Children's Health Outreach Coalition, Senior Transportation Program)
were solicited from appropriate nonprofits that had requested sponsorship in previous years.
These projects/agencies meet the criteria set out in the proposed Indian Community State Shared
Revenue Program• Local Nonprofit Participation policies.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully recommends that Council discuss the five projects under consideration and
indicate which project(s) should move forward in the grant application process.
ACTION REQUIRED
Review and discuss projects. Indicate which project(s) should move forward in the grant
application process
Attachment 1. Children's Health Outreach Coalition (Empowerment Systems, Inc)
Attachment 2• Electronic Community Message Marquee (City. Econ. Development Division)
Attachment 3. Fit Families (City. Parks and Recreation Department)
Attachment 4 Major Crimes Evidence Recovery Squad (City: Police Department)
Attachment 5: Senior Transportation Program (East Valley Adult Resources)
Page 3
�Qp r.Ck� �� ..
O 2a
VI I � w��
1 City of Apache junction
Development Services Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 3, 2011
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager
SUBJECT. City Council Work Session
June 6, 2011
Agenda Item Number 3 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION
ON PROPOSED POLICIES GOVERNING THE CITY'S
SPONSORSHIP OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS FOR
PARTICIPATION IN THE INDIAN COMMUNITY STATE SHARED
REVENUE PROGRAM
Attached are amended versions of the following documents contained in the staff report.
• City Council Report Attachment 3 (Proposed Intergovernmental Agreement
Between the City of Apache Junction and a Nonprofit Organization); and
• City Council Report Attachment 4 (Proposed Resolution Sponsorship a Local
Nonprofit for Participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue
Program)
The amended documents were not prepared in time for inclusion in the Council packet
The amended documents supersede the corresponding documents contained in the
Council packet and will be reviewed and discussed during the June 6, 2011 Council
work session.
Please accept staff's apologies for any inconvenience or confusion this may have
caused
Thank you
City Council Report. Attachment 3
Addendum 2
When recorded return to:
Richard Joel Stern, Esq.
Apache Junction City Attorney
300 East Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
GRANT PASS THROUGH AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION AND EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES
THIS GRANT PASS THROUGH AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as
of the day of 20_, by and between CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA, an Arizona municipal corporation ("City") and East Valley Adult
Resources, a nonprofit agency ("EVAR") City and EVAR are sometimes
referred to herein collectively as the "Parties," or individually as a "Party."
RECITALS
A. EVAR is a nonprofit organization which provides social,
recreational, fitness, advocacy, and transportation services at the Apache
Junction Active Adult Center for Apache Junction residents.
B. EVAR desires to utilize Gila River Indian Community funds for
transportation services in Apache Junction.
C The Gila River Indian Community ("GRIC") desires to convey to City
a portion of its annual 12% local revenue-sharing contribution required to
be paid to local governments for the benefit of the general public in
accordance with the Tribal-State Gaming Compact executed by and
between GRIC and the State of Arizona in 2003, and pursuant to A.R.S. §
5-601.02, for disbursement by City to EVAR.
D. City desires to disburse the aforementioned contribution to the
EVAR and to set forth the mutual understandings between City and EVAR
E. There is a need for mutual cooperation for a pass through of grant
funds from GRIC to City and ultimately to East Valley Adult Resources.
F. Mutual cooperation would result in EVAR's obtaining assistance
from City, which translates to public savings.
1
G. The Parties have mutual interests in this project and wish to enter
into this Agreement with certain terms and conditions
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the
mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, and for other consideration,
the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree
as follows:
1 . ACCURACY OF THE RECITALS: The Parties hereby confirm the
accuracy of the Recitals set forth above, which are incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS:
City agrees to do all of the following:
a. Disburse the aforementioned GRIC contribution to EVAR.
b. Review copies of all reports and documents sent to the Gila
River Indian Community by EVAR related to funded project.
3. EVAR'S OBLIGATIONS:
EVAR agrees to do all of the following:
a Hold harmless the City of Apache Junction and its agents for any
acts or omissions by City, its elected officials, appointees, and employees
b. Provide to the City of Apache Junction a copy of all reports and
documents sent to the GRIC related to funded project no later than 30 days after
their submission to GRIC
4. Purpose The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the rights
and responsibilities of the Parties with respect to the acceptance and
distribution of the contribution to EVAR.
5. Funding Schedule. GRIC shall deliver a one-time payment of
$45,000 to the City for disbursement to EVAR for the provision of transportation
services at the Apache Junction Active Adult Center ("Center"). The purpose of
the contribution is to provide City residents with transportation to the Center,
Center Programs, local medical appointments, and local shopping hubs.
6. Term. The Term of this Agreement is one calendar year from the
execution date.
7. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. EVAR shall indemnify, defend
and hold harmless the City, its Mayor and City Council, appointees, employees
and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, legal or administrative
proceedings, claims, demands, liens, losses, fines or penalties, damages,
liability, interest, fees for attorneys, consultants and accountants or costs and
expenses of any kind and nature, resulting from or arising out of the negligence
or willful misconduct of City, its Mayor and City Council, appointees, employees
and agents in performing the duties set forth in this Agreement.
8. Transactional Conflicts of Interest. The Parties acknowledge that
this Agreement is subject to cancellation pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. §
38-511.
9. Waiver. No waiver, whether written or tacit, of any remedy or
provision of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other
provision hereof or a permanent waiver of the provision concerned, unless
otherwise stated in writing by the Party to be bound thereby.
10. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be found
invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in
effect and be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
11. No Third Party Beneficiary Rights. The Parties agree that no third
party rights attach to this agreement
12. NOTICES: Except as otherwise required by law, any notice required
or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by
personal delivery, or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered,
return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the Parties at their
respective addresses set forth below, or at such other address as a Party may
designate in writing pursuant to the terms of this Section, or by telecopy or
telefacsimile machine, or by any nationally recognized express or overnight
delivery service (e.g. Federal Express or UPS), delivery charges prepaid:
If to City: City of Apache Junction
Attn City Manager
300 E. Superstition Blvd.
Apache Junction, Arizona 85119-2899
Telephone (480) 474-5066
Facsimile: (480) 474-5110
If to EVAR: East Valley Adult Resources
Attn Executive Director
3
45 West University
Suite A - Mesa, Arizona 85201
Telephone (480) 964-9014
Facsimile: (480)898-7306
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of
the date first set forth above.
EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES, an Arizona
nonprofit organization
By: Mary Turley
Its President, Board of Directors
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, an
Arizona municipal corporation
By: John S. Insalaco
Its: Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Kathy Connelly, City Clerk
APPROVE AS TO FORM:
By:
Richard J. Stern, City Attorney
4
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
County of )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
, 20_, by [Name], [Title] of [Other Agency], an Arizona
[description of agency].
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
(seal)
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2010, by John S. Insalaco, the Mayor of City of Apache
Junction, Arizona, an Arizona municipal corporation, who acknowledged that he
signed the foregoing instrument on behalf of City.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
(seal)
5
City Council Report: Attachment 4
Addendum: 3
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL
OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN
COMMUNITY FOR PROPOSITION 202 FUNDS.
WHEREAS, in 2002, Proposition 202 authorized new gaming
compacts between the State of Arizona and Arizona Indian Tribes
which included sharing of gaming revenues; and
WHEREAS, a portion of this state-shared revenue in an
amount of 12% can be retained by an Indian Tribe and distributed
to cities, towns or counties for government services that: 1)
benefit the general public; 2) mitigate the impacts of gaming;
and/or 3) promote commerce and economic development; and
WHEREAS, private, not-for-profit organizations wishing to
access Proposition 202 funding to provide public benefits must
secure sponsorship from a city, town or county before making
application. Said sponsorship must be expressed in a resolution
passed by the local government sponsor.
WHEREAS, the Gila Indian Community (the "Community") has
decided to exercise its option to retain and administer the 12%
share itself and has adopted guidelines and procedures for this
new program; and
WHEREAS, the Community developed an expanded list of
"priority areas" for which funding will be concentrated,
including public safety, transportation, healthcare services,
economic development, and education.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 :
Staff is authorized to submit an application, on behalf of East
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 1 OF 3
Valley Adult Resources, to the Gila River Indian Community for
Proposition 202 funds, and the Mayor is authorized to sign the
application, contracts and grant documents for receipt and
distribution of the Proposition 202 funds for the operation of
the transportation program at the Apache Junction Active Adult
Center in an amount not to exceed $45, 000.
Section 2 :
The Mayor is authorized to execute a Grant Pass Through
Agreement between the City of Apache Junction and the East
Valley Adult Resources Board of Directors for use of the funds
if the grant is awarded.
Section 3:
The Mayor is authorized to take any and all actions necessary to
implement and complete the activities submitted in the
application
Section 4 :
The City Manager or his or her designee is hereby authorized to
take whatever steps necessary to administer and procure the
funding.
Section 5:
The City has no duties under or related to this resolution other
than to receive the funds and deliver same to East Valley Adult
Resources; the determination as to the amount of funding is
solely at the discretion of the Gila River Indian Community. All
parties agree there are no third-party beneficiaries to this
document.
Section 6:
If awarded funding, East Valley Adult Resources will provide the
City of Apache Junction copies of all reports and documents
related to the project funded by the Gila River Indian
Community.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 2 OF 3
Section 7 :
The City Council supports this grant request for funding and if
awarded will administer the funds directly to East Valley Adult
Resources as a pass through grant .
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 2011.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2011
JOHN S. INSALACO
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RICHARD J. STERN
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 11-31
PAGE 3 OF 3
Isp,CH ✓y
City of Apache Junction
Home ofthe Superstition Mountains
4' ,zo$R
al Print
TO: City Manager's Office
FROM. Liz Riley, Human Resources Director
DATE: June 6, 2011
Agenda Type Work Session Agenda
Council Priority Focus Area: Budgeted Operational Item
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON TERM LIFE INSURANCE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
(RFP).
ACTION REQUESTED:
Presentation and Discussion
DISCUSSION/BACKGROUND INFORMATION.
Liz Riley, Human Resources Director, will provide an overview of the twelve responses to the Request
for Proposal (RFP)for term life insurance
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budgeted Expenditure
OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Click to download
D Cover Memo
1Rr2octP
To: George Hoffman, City Manager
Through: Bryant Powell,Assistant City Manager p�
From: Elizabeth H. Riley, Director of Human Resources
Date: May 13, 2011
Subject: Term Life Insurance
On March 16, 2011 the City of Apache Junction released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for group
life insurance Responses were due on April 20,2011at 2.00 PM. The City mailed copies of the
RFP to applicable companies on the City's bid list in addition to others who had expressed an
interest over time. The mailing went to approximately16 companies Information relating to the
RFP was also posted on the City's website and advertised in the Arizona Republic Responses
were received from 12 companies including Standard Insurance Company, which is the current
provider Responses were received from.
Aetna Humana MetLife Standard
Cigna ING MinnLife SunLife
Hartford Lincoln Prudential UNUM
The responses were reviewed by the City's Benefit Consultant,Jim Loeb and the Director of
Human Resources The Benefit Consultant and the Director of Human Resources
recommend the City accept the proposal submitted by Minnesota Life. The cost is$24,315
per year for a three(3)year contract this amount includes the Water District. It is also
recommended that there are two one-year renewal periods,for a total of five(5)years. It
is anticipated that by contracting with Minnesota Life the City will realize a cost avoidance of
approximately $7,535 while enhancing some of the provisions offered by the current provider
Elizabeth H Riley
Director of Human Resources
City of Apache Junction
300 E Superstition Blvd
Apache Junction.AZ 85219
480.474.2617
P4AHf✓
City of Apache unctio
Home of the Superstition Mountains
4RrzoNP
Print
TO. City Manager's Office
FROM: Brad Steinke, Director of Development Services
DATE: June 6, 2011
Agenda Type . Work Session Agenda
Council Priority Focus Area: Community Development
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED DOWNTOWN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT AND DESIGN
GUIDELINES
ACTION REQUESTED:
Presentation and Discussion
DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION.
The city council will continue their discussion on the proposed Downtown Overlay Zoning District and
the Downtown Design Guidelines, which were recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on April 26, 2011.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budgetary Approval Not Required
OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES.
Zoning Ordinance Requirement
RECOMMENDATION:
Presentation and discussion only
ATTACHMENTS:
Click to download
0 Cover Memo
P A H
City of Apache Junction
4q Development Services Department
To: Mayor and City Council
From• Brad Steinke, Director of Development Services
Date. May 25, 2011
RE: 1. Downtown Overlay Zoning District Draft
2. Downtown Overlay District Design Guidelines Draft
On June 6`h, the council is scheduled to have their 2"d work session on the proposed "Downtown
Overlay Zoning District" and the "Downtown Overlay District Design Guidelines". At the last
work session, staff gave a presentation of the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended
ordinance and design guidelines The following addresses comments made by the council at that
meeting.
1. Expectation that residential development within the Transition Zone will reflect the Old
West design. If the developer wishes to provide residential units above ground floor retail
uses, the old west design can easily be incorporated into the architecture If, however, the
developer wishes to build a stand alone multi-family building that's unrelated to a
business use, the residential developer may find the true old west design to be a liability
Alternatively, in those instances it seems reasonable to ask for a southwest design that
both relates to our design expectations and also provides the contemporary needs of the
rental/condo residential market. As an example, picture the Best Western motel building
design for the Apache Junction and Gold Canyon locations.
2 Should We Allow Standalone Multi-Family Residential Buildings in the Downtown?
Yes. If we look at emerging downtowns and catalysts for downtown reinvestment, multi-
family residential rentals and condos have been an important factor. While we might
prefer to have 1S` story retail and upper stories residential, the residential development
model typically reflects an independent residential product. Therefore, I think it's
important to allow flexibility with residential development approaches in the downtown
3 Building Height Conflict with Mountain Views. While our current city center district
("CCD") allows building heights up to 75 feet in portions of the Core Downtown Zone, it
is unlikely that our localized market will necessitate these higher urban buildings.
Alternatively, 4-story buildings up to 45 feet in height may occur within the CCD, but
should minimally impact mountain views.
4 Voluntary Approach to Design Guidelines May Not Fulfill II.wntown Plan Goals. The
Downtown Overlay District and Downtown Design Guidelines are being proposed as an
optional choice for property owners The Planning and Zoning Commission debated this
matter and concluded that a mandatory ordinance amendment may invite opposition,
protest and political failure. If, however, the council disagrees and is interested in
requiring mandatory design standards, the draft ordinance can be easily modified to
accomplish this
5. What Uses Should Be Allowed? The proposed overlay ordinance references the North
American Industry Classification System ("NAICS") for allowed uses, rather than using
the traditional approach to listing uses within the zoning regulations. Staff has distributed
an NAICS list of proposed allowed uses to council members (check your council boxes)
and is asking council members to review the list and determine which uses should be
... permitted by right, permitted by conditional use or expressly prohibited Hopefully we
can reconcile this list at the June 6th meeting
6. Will Temporary Use Regulations be Streamlined?Yes The proposed ordinance identifies
specific types of temporary uses that the city's Zoning Administrator would be allowed to
administratively approve without Planning & Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment
or City Council approval. Attached Exhibit A reflects an updated version of the
temporary uses proposed to be allowed through administrative approval by the Zoning
Administrator. Council members should review the temporary use table and determine if
additional uses should be added, or if some listed uses should be removed or modified.
7 Why is There No Minimum Lot Size Requirement for Business Sites? The short answer
is that G&G Consulting recommends that there be no minimum lot size in order to allow
flexibility with redevelopment of our current undersized lots From a practical matter, if
the developer complies with our necessary parking standards, building setback standards
and design standards, should we really be concerned about how small the building or site
is?
8. We Should Remove the Restriction on Liquidation Sales. Agreed Therefore, the first
sentence in paragraph 3, page 10 of the 4/28/11 draft version of the overlay ordinance
should be removed (i e,
9. Electronic Message and Temporary Signs. The proposed ordinance does not change the
.�. current regulations regarding temporary signs. Accordingly, the only temporary signs
allowed are two 30 square foot banners or two fin flags. Portable/A-frame signs are only
allowed adjacent to the road right-of-way in the CCD district.
This proposed ordinance does not change the current regulations regarding
electronic/digital message signs. More specifically, changing message signs for business
related messages are currently allowed only on freeway pylon signs, whereas downtown
business message signs are limited to only time, temperature and/or messages provided
by the city or state. If the council wishes to change the current prohibition on digital
business message signs in the downtown, staff will return with suggested standards.
Copies of the draft ordinance (4/28/11 version) and design guidelines (3/30/33 version) have
been previously distributed to you. You can also access on-line colored versions of these drafts at
the following city web site- http.//www.ajcity net/index aspx7nid=372 If you've misplaced
your copy, please let me know and we will replace it
2
I've repeated below the proposed ordinance summary from my previous memo
I. Downtown Overlay District Ordinance
Ordinance Application (p. 4). The overlay ordinance will ideally be applied through an
uncontested blanket rezoning of downtown properties initiated by the city council The ordinance
is intended to add to, not replace, the existing underlying base zoning Accordingly, the property
owners will have the choice to use either the base district zoning standards or the proposed
overlay district zoning standards If the property owner chooses to use the overlay district
standards rather than the base zoning district standards, their proposed development may be
subject to compliance with certain downtown design standards
Because the property owner, rather than the city, will decide whether or not to follow the overlay
district zoning standards and design guidelines, we recognize that the downtown brand promoted
through the G&G plan may not occur quickly or comprehensively In any event, this voluntary
rather than mandatory approach appeared more acceptable to stakeholders and may help avoid
property owner zoning protests.
Use Requirements (p. 5). Rather than attempting to create an exhaustive list of allowed uses
within each overlay zone, the proposed overlay zoning will refer to the well established and
comprehensive compendium of uses listed in the North American Industry Classification System
("NAICS") for allowed retail, office, administrative, and service uses While the proposed
overlay zoning and NAICS compendium specifically allows a greater amount of retail, office,
and service uses than the base zoning district, the overlay zoning excludes primary
manufacturing, wholesale, and construction uses, which are to some extent allowed in the base
districts See attached Exhibit A for further details.
As stated earlier, if the council wants to prohibit or require a conditional use permit for certain
types of retail or retail service uses such as tattoo parlors, check cashing stores, vender kiosks,
nightclubs, head shops or pawn shops, you should amend the draft ordinance accordingly
Temporary Uses (p. 6). The overlay zoning standards include specific criteria that allow, but
reasonably manage, certain types of temporary uses through a streamlined administrative review
and approval process Council members should review these proposed uses and time frames for
acceptability.
Zoning Standards (p. 8). This section establishes the dimensional zoning standards for the
overlay zones Clearly, these draft overlay zoning standards provide a relaxation of certain base
district standards as illustrated in the table below
Zoning District Comparison Table
Existing Proposed
Zones Zones
Zoning Suburban Transition Core Overlay
Standards CB-1 CB-2 CCD Overlay Zone Overlay Zone Zone
Max Residential N/A N/A 50 du/ac 30 du/ac 30 du/ac 50 du/ac
Density
Max FAR None None 3 1 5 2 3 0
3
•••• mo
Min Lot Size(business None None None None None None
use)
Min Lot Size 10,000 sq ft 7,000 sq ft N/A 5,000 sq ft 5,000 sq ft None
(residential use)
Min Lot Width O ft(bus) O ft(bus) N/A 50 ft O ft O ft
60 ft(res) 60 ft(res)
Min Bldg Front Setback 20 ft 15 ft(bus) Oft Oft Oft O ft
20 ft(res)
Min Bldg Side Setback 10 ft 10 ft(bus) O ft 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft
7 ft(res)
Min Bldg Rear Setback 10 ft/25 ft 10 ft/25 ft 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft
(alley/no (alley/no
alley) alley)
Max Height 30 ft 35 ft 75 ft 35 ft 45 ft 75 ft
Min Front Parking N/A N/A 20 ft 10 ft 10 ft 20 ft
Setback
Min Side or Rear N/A N/A N/A 3ft 3ft 3 ft
Parking Setback
Outside Use and Display Standards (p. 10). The overlay zoning standards will allow and
enable the conditional outdoor display of merchandise and outdoor dining
Parking Standards (p. 10) The overlay parking standards relax the existing parking use
standards for commercial uses in all three overlay zones, and introduce the ability for
administrative adjustment to the overlay parking standards based on certain technical criteria
Landscaping Standards (p. 12). The overlay landscaping standards substantially relax the
existing commercial landscaping standards (i.e., Chapter 6 of the Land Development Code) for
the Transition Overlay Zone. While these relaxed landscaping standards retain some minimal
effort to reduce the heat island effect of larger parking lot landscaping, the existing requirement
for buffers, trees, and shrubs has essentially been replaced with strategically placed planting
beds, flower boxes and pots that will minimally accommodate two 5 gallon shrubs per 20 feet of
property frontage.
This proposed overlay district landscape standard suggests that internal site landscaping is not
viewed as critically important for the Transition Zone and that if the city values landscaping
,••. along and/or within the right-of-way, the city will have to provide it
Mixed-Use Development Standards (p. 14) The overlay standards introduce and enable
mixed-use development as a permitted use by right with minimal development restrictions other
than the maximum floor area ratio, maximum height and minimum parking standards. In other
words, as presently drafted, any type and size of housing development may be placed anywhere
within the downtown area. While this may provide enormous discretion and incentive for
downtown housing,the council will need to discuss the following
• Are all types of residential (e.g., RVs, single-family homes, duplexes and manufactured
homes) appropriate for the downtown
• Should mixed-use only allow residential units above 1st floor retail uses, or also as
independent residential buildings without a retail component?
• Should we allow residential anywhere in the downtown, or are there some areas that
should be reserved for commercial use only?
4
Adak woo 1%.
• Should we encourage and provide regulatory incentives for certain types of residential
development (e g , senior housing, young professional housing, affordable housing, rental
housing, ownership housing, student housing, etc.)?
Live-Work Unit Standards (p. 14). The overlay standards provide specific standards for live-
work units.
Civil Engineering Standards (p. 15) The overlay standards provide a relaxed standard for
stormwater management requirements relative to downtown redevelopment, expansion, and
renovation projects. More specifically, the suggested standard would require that only a net
increase in impervious surface would necessitate stormwater management, and then the standard
would only have to meet the 10-year and 24-hour event
Additionally, the overlay district provides that the standards for access management (i.e.,
driveway locations and median cuts) could be administratively varied if determined that the
development can safely manage ingress and egress.
Sian Standards (p. 16) The proposed overlay district standards provide that signage within the
Suburban Zone and Core Downtown Zone (except for the CCD zoned properties) shall continue
to comply with the existing sign regulations Signage within the CCD District shall continue to
comply with the CCD District sign regulations. Signage in the Transition Zone, however, shall
comply with the existing sign regulations except as follows
• Substantially alteration to existing signs in the Transition Zone shall comply with the
Downtown Overlay District Design Guidelines for signage;
• Substantial improvement to existing buildings shall require existing and new signage to
comply with the Downtown Overlay District Design Guidelines for signage
The draft overlay ordinance limits temporary signs to the fin flags/banners currently in use, and
prohibits electronic/digital signs. If the council wishes to expand the use of temporary signs (e g,
A-frame signs) and electronic/digital signs along the Trail, now is the time to discuss it. �►
II. Downtown Overlay District Design Guidelines
The proposed Downtown Overlay District Design Guidelines are intended to replace and
supersede the city's existing design guidelines as applied to the downtown area The draft set of
design guidelines is intended to reflect the design standards recommended in the "Downtown
Redevelopment and Implementation Strategy" prepared by G&G Consulting and ultimately
approved by the city council.
The proposed guidelines provide a combination of descriptive and visual design criteria for
buildings, site development, landscaping, signage, lighting, open space and screening. Based on
the proposed approach, these guidelines would only be applied as required standards if the
developer/property owner chose to follow the Downtown Overlay District zoning and if the
proposed development/redevelopment was deemed substantial Otherwise, these proposed design
standards, like our existing design standards, are only advisory in nature.
5
mole
Exhibit A
Temporary Uses
The proposed Downtown Overlay Zoning District will provide, among other things, a
streamlined administrative approach to permitting certain types of temporary uses in the
downtown Table 26-2 reflects the types of temporary uses that the Zoning Administrator
would be authorized to administratively approve without P&Z, Board of Adjustment ("BOA") or
.•. Council review. Temporary uses not listed in the table would continue to require the necessary
conditional use permit or temporary use permit approvals from the P&Z or BOA, respectfully
[Note Table 26-2 below is an updated version of the table found on page 8 of the 4/28/11 draft
version of the overlay ordinance previously distributed to you]
Table 26-2:Temporary Uses and Structures Requiring Prior Administrative Approval
Temporary Use or Structure Maximum Time Frame Location
Temporary Office Facilities (i.e.,To 1 year Developed or
support existing or developing business use) developing site
Construction-Related Activities (i e, 1 year Developed or
Construction trailers,modular units and developing site
parking to support construction and land
development projects)
Community Events (Applies to events 4 consecutive days per Developed or vacant
conducted,organized and sponsored by calendar year site
non-profit organizations.See Volume I,
Chapter 8 of the Apache Junction City Code)
— Private Events (Applies to events 4 consecutive days per Developed or vacant
conducted,organized and sponsored by for- calendar year site
profit organizations/businesses See
Volume I,Chapter 8 of the Apache Junction
City Code)
Seasonal Holiday Sales for 40 days per holiday per Developed or vacant
Christmas, Halloween, Thanksgiving, location site
Easter or 4th of July/fireworks.
Farmers Market, Fruit& Produce 3 days per week per Developed or vacant
Stands (Excludes flea markets and swap location site
meets)
Flea Markets and Swap Meets(See 3 days per week per Developed site
Volume I,Chapter 8 of the Apache Junction location
City Code)
6
Vendors Using Carts, Booths or 3 days per week per Developed site
Kiosks(excludes food and beverage sales) location
Food/Beverage Cart or Concession 7 consecutive days per Developed site
Trailer(See Volume I,Chapter 8 of the location
Apache Junction City Code)
Car Tent Sales (i.e.,Applies only to city 7 consecutive days, 4 Developed site
approved new and/or used car sites) occurrences per year
Classic Car Shows 3 days per week per Developed site
location
Grand Openings (See Volume I,Chapter 14 consecutive days Developed site
8 of the Apache Junction City Code)
Art Display and/or Sales 7 days per week Developed or vacant
site
Notes:
1 City council approved special events conducted, organized and sponsored by non-profit
organizations do not require Development Services Department approval.
2 In addition to approval from the Zoning Administrator,temporary uses listed in Table 26-2
may require approval of the Building Official, Fire Marshall and/or Police Department
approval, and license approvals from the City Clerk's office
3 Approval of temporary uses not listed in Table 26-2 are subject to conditional use permit or
temporary use permit approval as otherwise provided in Chapter 1(Zoning Code)of the
City of Apache Junction Land Development Code
^
7
tsl•CHE�Gti
: City of Apache Junction
I
Home f the Superstition Mountains
4P/zoo>)
25,Print
TO: City Manager's Office
FROM: Kathy Connelly, City Clerk
DATE: June 6, 2011
Agenda Type . Work Session Agenda
Council Priority Focus Area: Additional Item Outside Scope of Identified Council
Priorities
TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION ON PROCEDURES FOR JUNE 7, 2011, COUNCIL MEETING.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Presentation and Discussion
DISCUSSION /BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Discussion on procedures and logistics for regular council meeting in order to effectuate council
transition.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budgetary Approval Not Required
OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Click to download
U cover memo
D cover memo
D insalaco oath of office
D insalaco certification of election
D barker oath of office
U barker certification of election
ra
D serdv oath of office
D serdv certication of election
U wilson oath of office
D wilson certification of election
/re
AO Ilk_ ...
Pp ACHE / •
cy f
icue
Home of the Superstition ,Jountanis
4Rj QNP
I►
MAY 19, 2011
MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
THROUGH GEORGE R HOFFMAN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: KATHLEEN CONNELLY, CITY CLERK `(, ,/
SUBJECT PROTOCOL FOR JUNE 7 COUNCIL MEETING
At the June 7 council meeting a "changing of the guard" of sorts will take place when I
swear in the mayor and three council members
In order to accomplish this transition with the honor and dignity it deserves, I will be
coordinating the ceremonies that are scheduled for the evening Since each of you will be
a participant, I ask that you please review the following procedures and let me know if you
have any questions
1 Mayor Insalaco will open the meeting. The invocation will be followed by the Pledge
of Allegiance
oak
2 Council will take action on the items listed on the Consent Agenda
3 Immediately following the Consent Agenda vote, Mayor Insalaco will present any
awards or read any proclamations that are listed on the agenda
4 Following any awards and proclamations, I will administer the Oaths of Office. I will
stand on the center-right of the room (as you face the dais) in front of the speaker's
podium. The person taking the oath will be facing me and standing at the
approximate center of the room When I move to the podium area I will firs':ask for
•voice(480)982-8002 • i`AX (480)982-7018 • fDr)(-180)983-0095 • ‘‘‘%ti4 tacit net
300 13 Super•tttion i3oute‘ard, Apache Junction,AZ 85219
p
Protocol for June 7 Council meeting Page 2
mayor-elect Insalaco to come to the floor of the council chambers to take the oath of
office I will repeat this for each of the three councilmembers-elect, calling upon you
in alphabetical order (Barker, Serdy, Wilson) and administering individual oaths
You will each be asked to raise your right hand and repeat the oath after me I will
do the oath a few words at a time and wait for you to complete each section before
going onto the next Copies of the oath are in the council packet under this item so
you can become familiar with the words
After you have each taken your oath, please step to the side and remain standing
until I complete the ones for the remaining councilmembers-elect
5 After all oaths have been taken, I will announce to Mayor Insalaco that all of the
requirements of state law and city code have been met and that the members of the
Apache Junction City Council are ready to assume their official duties.
6 Mayor Insalaco will then ask the newly-sworn councilmembers to take their seats
and will introduce them to the audience
7 Mayor Insalaco and councilmembers will take the opportunity to introduce visiting
officials, special guests and family members in the audience.
8 Following the introductions, the meeting will proceed with Call to the Public and the
remainder of the agenda
NOTE 1 Due to budget limitations, there will not be a reception following the
meeting.
2 Due to budget limitations, we will not be sending out invitations for this
meeting and swearing in
3 Cameras, including video cameras, can be used in the council chambers
provided they do not interfere with the meeting
Please contact me if you have any questions
City of Apache Junction
OATH OF OFFICE
STATE OF ARIZONA )
County of Pinal ) ss
City of Apache Junction )
I, JOHN S INSALACO, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the
United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona, and the Ordinances
of the City of Apache Junction, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, and
defend them against all enemies, foreign or domestic, and that I will faithfully and
impartially discharge the duties of the office of Mayor according to the best of my abihty,
so help me God.
bk Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of June,2011.
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF ELECT ION
I, Kathleen Connelly, Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal and Maricopa,
State of Arizona DO HEREBY CERTIFY that at a Primary Election held in and for the City of Apache
Junction on the 8th day of March, 2011,
John S . Insalaco
was duly elected to the office of Mayor of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal and
Maricopa, State of Arizona, as appears by the official returns approved by the City Council and
on file
in my office.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of Apache Junction this 7th day of June, 2011
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
City of Apache Junction
OATH OF OFFICE
STATE OF ARIZONA )
County of Pmal ) ss
City of Apache Junction )
I, ROBIN BARKER, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of
the United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona, and the
Ordinances of the City of Apache Junction; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the
same, and defend them against all enemies, foreign or domestic, and that I will faithfully
and impartially discharge the duties of the office of Councilmember according to the best
of my ability, so help me God.
.., Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of June,2011
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION
I, Kathleen Connelly, Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal and Maricopa, r
State of Arizona DO HEREBY CERTIFY that at a Primary Election held in and for the City of Apache
Junction on the 8th day of March, 2011,
Robin Barker
was duly elected to the office of Councilmember of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal
and
Maricopa, State of Arizona, as appears by the official returns approved by the City Council and
on file
in my office
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of Apache Junction this 7th day of June, 2011
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
1
City of Apache Junction
OATH OF OFFICE
STATE OF ARIZONA )
County of Penal ) ss
City of Apache Junction )
I, JEFF SERDY, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the Constitution of the
United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona, and the Ordmances
of the City of Apache Junction, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, and
defend them against all enemies, foreign or domestic, and that I will faithfully and
impartially discharge the duties of the office of Councilmember according to the best of
my ability,so help me God.
.r Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of June,2011
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION
I, Kathleen Connelly, Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal and Maricopa,
State of Arizona DO HEREBY CERTIFY that at a General Election held in and for the City of Apache
Junction on the 17th day of May, 2011,
Jeff Serdy
was duly elected to the office of Mayor of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal and
Maricopa, State of Arizona, as appears by the official returns approved by the City Council and
on file
in my office.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of Apache Junction this 7th day of June, 2011
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk
City of Apache Junction
OATH OF OFFICE
STATE OF ARIZONA )
County of Pinal ) ss
City of Apache Junction )
I, WALTER "CHIP" WILSON, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will support the
Constitution of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona,
and the Ordinances of the City of Apache Junction, that I will bear true faith and
allegiance to the same, and defend them against all enemies,foreign or domestic, and that
I will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of the office of Councilmember
according to the best of my ability,so help me God
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of June,2011
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION
I, Kathleen Connelly, Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal and Maricopa,
State of Arizona DO HEREBY CERTIFY that at a General Election held in and for the City of Apache
Junction on the 17th day of May, 2011,
Walter "Chip" Wilson
was duly elected to the office of Councilmember of the City of Apache Junction, Counties of Pinal
and
Maricopa, State of Arizona, as appears by the official returns approved by the City Council and
on file
in my office.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of Apache Junction this 7th day of June, 2011.
Kathleen Connelly
City Clerk