Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011 06.20 City Council Work Session Agenda
I__ 44, City of Apache Junction .Home of the uperstition Al air stain 4Rlzoorr APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION A.. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 EAST SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85219 Monday, June 20, 2011 7:00 PM AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2 ROLL CALL. 3 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC COUNCIL(GPEC)AGREEMENT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCILMEMBER AS THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE GPEC BOARD OF DIRECTORS The City of Apache Junction joined the Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC)in 2007 and renewed its membership in 2008, 2009,and 2010 The contract provides for national and international business recruitment services and targeted marketing, research,competitive analysis and prospect management for commercial/industrial- type prospects within the city limits This would be a continuation of those services through 2012 4.. Councilmember Serdy currently serves as the city representative to the GPEC Board of Directors 4 PRESENTATION BY AND DISCUSSION WITH PAUL PECORA,SENIOR MANAGER,OR A REPRESENTATIVE OF MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS, REGARDING UPDATE ON MEDIACOM OUTREACH AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Paul Pecora,Senior Manager, Area Operations-Arizona, or a representative of Mediacom Communications will provide an update on Mediacom's community outreach and recent developments. 5 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MARICOPA COUNTY FOR FIRE PRE-EMPTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE ON COUNTY OWNED TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHERN AVENUE AND MERIDIAN DRIVE Presentation and discussion on an intergovernmental agreement between Mancopa County and the City of Apache Junction for fire pre-emption equipment installation and maintenance on county owned traffic signals at the intersection of Southern Avenue and Meridian Drive 6 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON ENTERING INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE UTILIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM(STP) FUNDS. Presentation and discussion on entering into an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Department of p Amik Transportation for Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Money. 7 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE INDIAN COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM During the June 6,2011 City Council Work Session,staff presented a number of documents to the council regarding the possible city sponsorship of non-profit organizations for the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program The proposed policies that were provided to council contained an error Staff will be reviewing with the council the corrections needed to that document Also,staff will answer any additional questions about the proposed policies 8. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 11-30 AUTHORIZING THE .-. SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNITY MARQUEE. Resolution No 11-30 authorizes the submission of a grant application to the Gila River Indian Community for the acquisition of an electronic community message marquee The resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$50,000,the city would provide up to$10,000 of cash as match 9 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 11-23 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR SUPPORT OF THE CITY'S FIT FAMILIES PROGRAM. Resolution No 11-23 authorizes the submission of a grant application to the Gila River Indian Community for support of the City's Fit Families Program The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$35,900,the city would provide up to$31,484 of in-kind services as match 10 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 11-33 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION BY THE CITY ON BEHALF OF EMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR SUPPORT OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE OUTREACH PROGRAM AT EMPOWERMENT SYSTEM'S CENTER. Resolution No 11-33 authorizes the submission of a grant application by the city on behalf of Empowerment Systems to the Gila River Indian Community for support of the Health Insurance Outreach Program at the Empowerment Center The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$50,000; Empowerment Systems would provide up to$136,756 of in-kind services as match 11. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 11-24 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A MAJOR CRIMES EVIDENCE RECOVERY SQUAD Resolution No 11-24 authorizes the submission of a grant application to the Gila River Indian Community for the acquisition of a major crimes evidence recovery squad The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$38,685,the city would provide up to$7,340 of cash and equipment as match 12. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 11-31 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION BY THE CITY ON BEHALF OF EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR SUPPORT OF THE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AT THE APACHE JUNCTION ACTIVE ADULT CENTER. Resolution No 11-31 authorizes the submission of a grant application by the city on behalf of East Valley Adult Resources to the Gila River Indian Community for support of the Transportation Program at the Apache Junction Active Adult Center The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for $45,000,East Valley Adult Resources would provide up to$43,261 as match 13 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSED TENTATIVE FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 CITY BUDGET. 14. ADJOURNMENT. Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the City Clerk's office. 300 East Superstition Boulevard,Apache Junction,AZ Monday through Friday,8 00 a m to 5 00 p m, excluding holidays If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation,please notify the Human Resources Office, at(480)474-2617 or(480)983-0095(TDD) at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled time 0?'4 kf✓G 4: City of Apa the Junction Home of the .Super:slitioti . iortntains licrzot * Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Steve Fllipowicz, Economic Development Director DATE: June 20, 2011 Agenda Type Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area• Economic Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC COUNCIL (GPEC)AGREEMENT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCILMEMBER AS THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REPRESENTATIVE TO THE GPEC BOARD OF DIRECTORS. ACTION REQUESTED Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Apache Junction joined the Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) in 2007 and renewed its membership in 2008, 2009, and 2010 The contract provides for national and international business recruitment services and targeted marketing, research, competitive analysis and prospect management for commercial/industrial-type prospects within the city limits This would be a continuation of those services through 2012. Councilmember Serdy currently serves as the city representative to the GPEC Board of Directors FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Expenditure OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS. Click to download ❑ Staff Memo ❑ Ehxibit A L] Exhibit B ❑ Exhibit C ❑ Exhibit D ❑ Exhibit E Steve Filipowicz From: Mary Barker[barkerr43@yahoo corn] Sent. Monday, June 20, 2011 4 58 PM To: Steve Filipowicz Subject: Re Steve's GPEC slides 6 20 11 (Work Session) Here are my questions- Pg 3• what is the "effort into CA9 How will/could it impact us? Pg 10. "emerging tech assists" for us77 Or just some members Pg 11• if Pinal Co. Is part of the partnership, wouldn't that make our membership redundant? Pg 12. this yr will we benefit from their development of community competitive program Pg 15• why do we need GPEC in order to target these areas9 I can ask these at the meeting or you can refer to them as my questions and respond accordingly Thanks, Robin Barker On Jun 20, 2011, at 5.47 PM, Steve Filipowicz <sfilipowicz@AJCity.Net> wrote. CM Barker, I recognize tonight's is a {potentially lengthy} 13 item agenda I'm going with the "brevity is a virtue"principal and looking to keep it short Naturally I'll try to respond to whatever questions Council may have. - Steve Stephen J Filipowicz Economic Development Director City of Apache Junction 300 East Superstition Blvd Apache Junction, AZ 85119 Home of the Superstition Mountains (480)474-5064 sfilipowiczalcity.net www alcity net 1 Investing in GPEC I City of Apache Junction Community Benefits Report The Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) is a performance-driven, public-private partnership GPEC partners with the City of Apache Junction, Maricopa County, 19 other communities and 140 private-sector investors to promote the region's competitive position and attract quality jobs that enable strategic economic growth and provide increased tax revenue for Apache Junction Apache Junction Revenue Return (4-year trend): 6:1 GPEC and our partners help Apache Junction Investment increase the quality and Funding Request for FY12. $17,477 quantity of transactions in the (MAG 2010 Population— with 15% reduction in funding) region by. Current Funding for FY11. $18,469 • Marketing industry- (MAG 2009 Population— with 15% reduction in funding) specific business cases to showcase our competitive advantages • Expanding prospecting Driven Results activities in California and other domestic markets The City of Apache Junction benefits from site location projects and GPEC activities that occur across the region. • Securing international • Economic development projects create value by generating public investment. and private revenues. • Commute patterns and retail studies show that employees of • Capturing opportunities in 'locates' live and spend their incomes in all Greater Phoenix emerging technology communities Thus, when a company selects a Greater Phoenix around solar and location, all communities benefit with increased tax revenues healthcare • 283 jobs region-wide' for Apache Junction residents from GPEC- assisted locates • Connecting prospects with local R&D expertise • Addressing gaps in the market such as Return on Investment(4-year trend) speculative buildings, technology parks and • $6 of direct revenue'for every $1 invested. accelerators, and venture capital • $13 of total revenue3 for every $1 invested. • $8.1 million in new consumer spending' generated by employed Apache Junction residents. An addition of$7 9 created by multiplier This report summarizes the effects, results in total consumer spending of$16 0 million significant benefits and return 1 on investment GPEC delivers • $522,108 in new Apache Junction direct revenues (boosted to to the City of Apache Junction $1 1 M when including related multiplier effects of$573,074) and this region 'Revenue estimates are from the Greater Phoenix Consensus Impact Model. In 1999, GPEC and our members developed the region's first-ever consensus-based revenue and economic impact model Based on nationally accepted multiplier data provided by IMPLAN,the model is customized to calculate economic and revenue benefits for GPEC's members and the State of Arizona 'Includes property,sales and utility taxes, as well as state-shared and other local revenues 'Includes direct revenues plus those generated by related supplier and consumer jobs GREATER PHOENIX ECONOMIC COUNCIL Regional Results Summary FY11* FY10 5 Year Total Payroll Generated $311 3M $89 3M $920 5M Jobs 7,157 2,391 20,972 High-wage Jobs 4,371 527 11,476 Average Salary $43,493 $37,340 $43,892 Qualified Prospects 169 209 911 Earned Media Reach 152 3M 479 5M 769.6M Assisted Locates 30 20 116 Capital Investment $766 1M $156 9M $1.9B `Through May 31, 2011 Targeted Opportunities Apache Junction advances GPEC's mission of attracting quality companies to the region by • Responding to 'E-Track' prospect requests. • Participating in prospect community visits • Hosting ExecuTours, tailored events for high-level decision- makers • Prospecting at trade shows, conferences and sales missions to expand the project pipeline Competitive Intelligence GPEC offers Apache Junction access to unique tools and expertise • Comprehensive demographic, labor, targeted industry information and marketing assistance • CoStar real estate database • MetroComp operating cost-comparison software for 50 markets • Community Building Consortium • Greater Phoenix Consensus Impact Model analysis • Community Partnership Program. Community Leadership Leadership is critical to ensuring the success of your community, GPEC and the region's economic vitality Engagement Opportunity ' pache Junction Involvement GPEC Board of Directors Jeff Serdy Economic Development Directors Team (EDDT) Steve Filipowicz GPEC Next Operating as a more comprehensive and innovative practice, GPEC Next pursues opportunities with greatest potential for the region through deeper collaboration with our stakeholders, communities and partners By integrating international attraction and an emerging technologies focus with GPEC's core domestic competency, we will satisfy the market's needs for a stronger, better, proactive regional economic development organization GPEC Next will achieve a thorough understanding of our competitiveness, realize a streamlined, direct-selling approach to competitor and global markets, and make dynamic improvements to the region's business climate s "` ° Cityo .,� ache Junction (-----s 19,C,fii:—.J0 pl:-'-'''' f q NP � RIZO „„,-„„ i/,/i . 4,,ii:3/,,,i•ii /,i„„%if,I.i Economic(Development(Division DATE. June 8, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO Honorable Mayor and City Council MEMORANDUM THROUGH• George Hoffman, City Manager 1 MEMORANDUM FROM: Steve Filipowicz, Econ Dev. Dir ..,)) 4-j SUBJECT. Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) Contract Renewal FY 2011-2012 -Staff Report It is time once again for Council to consider renewing Apache Junction's membership/contract for services with the Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) for FY 2011-2012 Our City's share, based on the existing per capita formula, is $17,477.00 (down from $18,469.00 for FY 10/11 due to census figure adjustments). Additionally, GPEC is positioning to launch a million dollar effort into California in the weeks and months ahead, this is in addition to the on-going push that has been underway for several years To support this GPEC is seeking to build a $125,000 00 web-based platform that will enable us {GPEC & member communities} to better market and brand our region in this digital age. This one-time capital outlay was not previously budgeted for, as a result, GPEC is seeking an additional $1,764.00 from Apache Junction (our share based on the existing per capita formula) to be added to next year's contract renewal of $17,477.00 for a grand total of $19,241.00. Funding of the GPEC contract renewal in the amount of$19,241 00 is included in the draft FY2011-2012 city budget. This past year staff submitted qualified candidate site submittals on eight GPEC leads. Projects, Charlie, Glass, Hill, Billion, Deep Joy, Electncman, 4ih State, and AC/DC Apache Junction joined GPEC in July 2007 Below is an excerpt from the staff memo of May 2007 when the matter was then being considered in our efforts to implement Council's guidance to be more aggressive in our economic development activities on behalf of Apache Junction, and building upon our efforts to put a team in place to do this day to day, the single most important step I can identify to you and Council is to pursue membership in the Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC). Doing so tells the valley, and the world, that Apache Junction is serious about economic development, and is prepared to make the commitment of time, staff and funding necessary to compete successfully in this market Investment in GPEC is a long term proposition In the case of Surprise, it was something like eight or more years before a GPEC "deal" actually located within their city limits However, through area economic impact modeling, the elected officials and staff were able to see the positive impact of other GPEC leads locating nearby Staff respectfully recommends renewing the contract with GPEC for FY 2011-2012 and re- designating a Council member to the GPEC Board of Directors • Voice(480) 982-8002 FAX(480)982-7018 TDD(480) 983-0095 • www ajcity net 300 E Superstition Boulevard, Apache Junction, AZ 851 19 EXHIBIT A 6i9E-C f.JsC4L yr41q 2012 /ice%on P/a,, 1. \ .. \ \k - i' • --' , ,,.. ..\\\\ \ , , t ,,„- \ • , _.__ ,,. :, ‹-\\.//' .z_ - , ...... _ , _ \ 1111W.44 i k ' -1 . - -- /! __., • __ -- _ Horizo A.. .. , . „, . 4 4 * ® M Vision and rogress yip Greater Phoenix ECONOMIC COUNCIL ) 4 OPEC STAKEHOLDERS 6 FY12 METRICS Current 5fC(te 7 FY12 BUDGET Amid recent estimates of a longer economic recovery, 8 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT GPEC's mission has never been more relevant STRATEGIC PLAN 10 COMPETITVENESS REVISITED Greater Phoenix 12 MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS GPEC is motivated by the simple desire to make a real difference I CONOMIC COUNCIL 13 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT LEADING THE WAY and this purpose is reflected in the organization's body of work Through 2010 and into 2011 GPEC has stretched to accomplish more with less At a time when many have been forced to diminish 1 their efforts GPEC has rallied to deliver performance measures hc!C. i � C.k*�eC'[ i h and fulfill competitiveness objectives to provide exceptional returns to its constituents More importantly GPEC has shifted into higher / gear to impact Arizona's families whose quality of life is dependent 7'417e rcil/(Dz�.),.0,13 Pa3e6 on good jobs and new investment in the region's economy ' In alignment with its objective of A New Horizon ensuring GPEC operates in an FY11 MILESTONES innovative,integrated,proactive While the current outlook indicates an economic rebound after economic development model, MO'dFNTUM GAINED IN THE LAST YEAR—SELECT ACHIEVEMENTS AND KEY BENCHMARKS the GPEC Next led a Iasi 2014 OPEC's aim and obligation to serve its member communities p remain Accordingly GPEC has assessed what steps are needed Council assembled a task force FY12 ACTION ITEMS to chart a new course for the to move Greater Phoenix to the next level and what role the SAMPLE OF ACTIVitIES THAT ADHERE TO A FIVE YEAR VISION AND RESULT IN PROGRESS organization over the next five organization should assume within the next five years GPEC years. r r has outlined a new horizon under the mission-critical framework '`�' DRIVES THESE FY12 METRICS of Business Development Competitiveness,and Marketing The scope of the task SHOYYO"1kkTIONSHIP BETWEEN ACTION ITEMS AND ANNUAL PERFORMANCE GOALS and Communications These strategic"pillars will serve as the force included: gri tip/ foundation for annual tactics and activities that will be implemented • Itill over a five year period •Establishing a framework for key areas of focus Vision and Progress which will serve as a Strategic pillars will guide OPEC's fiscal year activities and by 2016 roadmap for theorganization lead to the following vision statements over the next five years GPEC Mission Strategic Pillar By 2016 •Evaluating the governance Retention and OPEC's RtE model wit be best-in-class roadmap funding models Attract quality businesses to the Greater Phoenix Expansion . region from around the world and advocate and Next Generation OPEC wit elevate Greater Phoenix as a Overall findings and - champion foundational efforts to improve the leading center of emerging technologies. recommendations were shared with public-sector members for ) region's competitiveness Attraction • GPEC mil maintain its reputation as a credible input,presented to the GPEC q. t respectable and"go to organization Next Leadership Council,and J submitted to GEC's Executive -: A Ne intamatbnal OPEC's foreign direct inactive m approach• will be a national best investment Committee and Board of Directors for consideration and Vision and Regional Brand GPEC wit satreg,on t define Greaterrdh approval. Phoenix as a regren that is forward thinking. Progress innovative and business-friendly GPEC Brand GPEC wit be the nation's premier agency it nomic development realandm in Ar zo in na.GPEC will be principal Ieadershp organization I1 i / Capital Markets i ' OPEC wit develop a science and technology j ri,'� ,i \ Venture Formation based fund that will drive r x",,. i'/f. v.��i�\ jregional innovation Gold Silver Bronze IPEC SeakeholderS A.T STILL UNIVERSITY MA VISTA TECH APPLIED ECONOMICS AETNA ADOLFSON 8 PETERSON CONSTRUCTION ADVANTAGE OFFICE SUITES ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS CAREFREE PARTNERS BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF ARIZONA ARIZONA OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES DIRCKS MOVING SERVICES c- CANCER TREATMENT CENTERS OF AMERICA AUSTIN COMMERCIAL GALLAGHER&KENNEDY Platinum CAPITAL COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT INC AVNET IRG ENS DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS.LLC •9fi'-'�''�- -- CASSIDY TURLEY/BRE COMMERCIAL BANK OF ARIZONA MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY AAA ARIZONA CB RICHARD ELLIS BRIDGERS 8 PAXTON CONSULTING ENGI ORCUTTIWINSLOW PARTNERSHIP ALLIANCE BANK OF ARIZONA CELGENE CORPORATION NEERS INC PERINI BUILDING COMPANY INC. I- APS CENTRAL ARIZONA COMMERCE PARK.LW BRYAN CAVE PLANT SOLUTIONS ARIZONA CARDINALS COE&VAN LOO CONSULTANTS INC CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES SKYSONG THE ASU SCOTTSDALE INNOVATION ,,400. ARIZONA REPUBLIC/GANNETT FOUNDATION COLUERS INTERNATIONAL CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR CENTER �P;, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COMPASS BANK COVANCE SUNSTATE EQUIPMENT COMPANY ,;) AT&TANCOSTAR GROUP DIBBLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING BANNER HEALTH CRESAPARTNERS DPR CNSRUCTI CHASE CUSHMAN 8 WAKEFIELD THE ELLMAN COMPANIES ) COX COMMUNICATIONS DELOITTE FACILITEC D.L WITHERS CONSTRUCTION DEUTSCH ARCHITECTURE GROUP FENNEMORE CRAIG DMB ASSOCIATES EL DORADO HOLDINGS FERVOR CREATIVE ERNST 8 YOUNG ENSEMBLE DEVMAN OF ARIZONA GOODMANS INTERIOR STRUCTURES FREEPORT MCMORAN COPPER&GOLD INC GAMMAGE&BURNHAM GRANT THORNTON HENSLEY MDR ARCHITECTURE INTEL CORPORATION HUMANA HINES JABIL Member Communities JOBING.COM HOWARD S WRIGHT CONSTRUCTORS JOB BROKERS INC/JB1 ENERGY KTAR IASIS HEALTHCARE JOHNSON CARLIER MARACAY HOMES JE DUNN CONSTRUCTION KAHALA CORPORATION Maricopa County Goodyear MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES JENNINGS STROUSS&SALMON PL.0 KELLY SERVICES IN-KIND SUPPORT MAYO CLINIC JOHN C LINCOLN HEALTH NETWORK KPMG LLP Phoenix Buckeye MIDFIRST BANK JONES LANG LASALLE LAND ADVISORS ORGANIZATION NAJAFI COMPANIES KITCHELL MARSH Mesa Casa Grande NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA KLUTZNICK COMPANY MCSHANE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Glendale MafICO a PETSMART LAYTON CONSTRUCTION MSS TECHNOLOGIES p PHOENIX SUNS LEWIS 8 ROCALLP• NORTHERN TRUST BANK Chandler Apache Junction POWER-ONE Mal BANK OSBORN MALEDON SCF ARIZONA MCCARTHY BUILDING COMPANIES THE PLAZA COMPANIES Scottsdale Fountain Hills SRP MORTENSON CONSTRUCTION QUARLES&BRADY ST.JOSEPH'S HOSPITALS MEDICAL CENTER ON 0 FINANCIAL QUEEN CREEK.LANDMARK PROPERTY Gilbert Queen Creek STIRLING ENERGY SYSTEMS INC. PAYPAL RISC UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RYL.EY,OARLOCK A APPLEWHITE Tempe Tolleson USAA POLSINELLI SHUGHART SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE US AIRWAYS' PTE REAL ESTATE GROUP LLC SNELL&WIENER LLP Peoria Wickenburg VERIZON WIRELESS RENAISSANCE COMPANIES SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION Surprise Gila Bend WASTE MANAGEMENT SINDEL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS' TARGET COMMERCIAL INTERIORS i' p WELLS FARGO SMITHGROUP UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Avondale WESTCOR SOLARCITY UNIVITA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES WEST VALLEY NATIONAL BANK SQUIRE SANDERS 8 DEMPSEY WIST OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY SUN HEALTH WOOD PATEL&ASSOCIATES INC SUNDT CONSTRUCTION WYNDHAM PHOENIX' UPS Horizon: WEALTHTRUST ARIZONA A N (Ho ew rizon: WESPAC CONSTRUCTION,INC 1 1 V .✓ VISiOII di iU Huy' y 6PEC/-Y2 012 Rct,'en Plot 3 3 . ) fit 2 Mee,-,- ,5 1YI2 &edjee JULY 1,2011 THROUGH JUNE 30,2012 Threshold Target Stretch Revenues FY10.11 Budget FY10.11 Forecast' %of total FY11 12 %of total Variance" Change Public Funds $ 1 905,340 5 1 954,971 41.8% $ 1.883,032 40.2% $ (71,939) -3.7% Payroll Generated $168 7M $187 5M $206 2M Private Funds 2.562,700 2.710,700 58.0% 2,792,000 59.6% 81.300 3.0% Other Income 8,000 8,000 0.2% 6000 0.2% 0.0% Total Revenues $ 4,476,040 $ 4,673,671 100.0% $ 4,683,032 100.0% $ 9,361 0.7 Number of Jobs 4,005 4,450 4,895 Operating Expenditures Business Attraction 5 342,900 $ 367,900 7 9% $ 273,500 5.8% $ (94,400) 25 7% Marketing 305,500 $ 307,500 6.8% 177,200 3.8% $ (130,300) -42.4% High Wage Jobs 1,701 1,890 2,079 Research a Strategy 152,000 $ 150,000 3.2% 128,600 2.7% $ (21,400) 14.3% External Relations 275 120 $ 293 120 6.3% 240,300 5.1% $ (52,820) -18.0% Average High-Wage $47,398 $52,664 $57,930 Resource Management 231,300 $ 246,300 5.3% 236,000 5.0% $ (10,300) 3.2% gSalary Personnel 3 169,3e1 $ 3 169,381 67.8% 3264,510 69.7% $ 95,129 3.0% .... ................ .............................._.............................................................. Facilities 485,052 $ 485,052 10.4% 464,000 9.9% $ (21,052) -4.3% Emer in Techno Assets 8 10 12 Expenses $ 4,961,253 $ 5,019,253 107.4% $ 4,784,110 102.2% $ (235,143) 4.7% g gy Net Income/CI-oast $ (485,213) $ (345,582) 7 4% $ (101,078) •2.2% $ 244,504 70.8% ............................................._......,........... Less Capital Expenditures (25 000) (25,000) -0.5% (20,000) -0.4% 5,000 20.0% Total Number of Qualified Prospects 187 208 229 Add Rent 146 142 176,820 3.8% 0.0% (176,820) 100.0% p Add. Depreciation 46000 67,000 1.4% 50,000 1.1% (17,000) -25.4% Net Cash Movement Operations (268,071) (126,762) -2.7% (71,078) -1.5% $ 55,584 •43.9% Total Number of Qualified International Prospects 28 31 34Net change in cash reserves $ (26e,071) S (126,762) $ (71,078) S 55,684 43.9 Total Reach of Editorial Placements 99M 110M 121 M Notes 'Foreaested results as of April 30 2011 Stakeholder Satisfaction with Business Attraction 7 0' 7 3' 7 6' Competitive Position Progress '" " "" ...................... Meet or Exceed Cash Reserve Target 98% 100% 102% aASIit(3NAscarCx 11010 ) As 0E1EPMa1eo an GPEC's EXECInivE COtiell11EE A 'New .l Horizon: 6 6PCC f)'2OI2 a n Y-Pi. sion and Prow-,_}c Be1 n55 .�eve/opn-rene (f 5 e FY11 Milestones Create and maintain high quality jobs and investment through targeted,direct selling Proactively pursue the best projects that meet community Industry leaders First Solar and regional objectives Fluidic Energy Gestamp and Power One announced major r Yi?Action Item, manufacturirg/technobgy ) locations joining China based Bolster International and Go Forth in China Leverage Opportunity in California Suntech s U.S headquarters As a natural partner to the Golden State GPEC will continue to build the GPEC's international program will assume a more dominant role in business case for California businesses to expand or relocate to the region ' attraction efforts •Deepened relationships with • China will remain at the top of opportunity rich markets Exploration Approaching year three the Sun Corridor Partners(GPEC, Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities,Greater Yuma Economic will continue for a formal Investment relationship with Jiangsu province and key national consultantsDevelopment Corporation City of Flagstaff and Pinal County)are enhancing visiting approximately 80 in 's business development efforts will focus on attracting supply-chain companies the current joint California strategy with a refined selling strategy face to face briefings i ,i. ,, OPEC will build its global brand by expanding targeted sates missions increasing participation at conferences and delivering keynote Target 10.000 small to medium-sized enterprises in California presentations in Western Europe,Spain Germany and Canada to expand the value chain and manufacturing capabilities for Arizona's key GPEC assisted five anchor companies international locates and Broaden Site-Selector Approach increased the international ,••• Additional locus will be placed on companies that prospect pipeline by 16% t In the past year GPEC has seen a 10.5%Increase in prospect activity from have offices in California with headquarters in other domestic markets national site selectors GPEC will continue to build a strong program to engage the top 100 national site selectors as an integral pert of direct-selling efforts Through April GPEC already Expand ExecuTour Model solidified a record year in With a well established ExecuTour model in place GPEC will continue to target performance over the last national site-selection consultants while also including international delegations decade Year-end projections investment organizations and chief level executives of prospective locates. Drives These FY12 Metrics indicate GPEC is on track to GPEC will also expand the ExecuTour business forum structure to gain the •Pipeline of qualified prospects deliver a best-ever year in the perspectives and participation of national public relations experts economic •Total number of jobs created organization's 22 year history development thought leaders and top executives from national and international •Number of high-wage jobs created media outlets Average high-wage salary ) About 20 of the nations •Payroll generated esteemed site-selection i •Stakeholder satisfaction with consultants visited the region business attraction as part of the ExecuTour series •Competitive position progress A New Horizon: Fr Gacc fry.?01.2 netics,,PM, Vison and Pro `e:.S ) r cv pee,e;v ne.ss FY11 Milestones Guide new,strategic business opportunities through geographic and industry trend analysis Worked closely with the Evaluate targeted,sound economic development programs that Governor's office and state enhance regional and state competitiveness leadership to shape the economic development r t 2 Act,on 4',t.ir,-, programs introduced in the Pursue Emerging Innovation package Launch Pilot Retention and Expansion Model GPEC will monitor innovative technology trends and develop a viable OPEC will create a retention and expansion mechanism based on the strengths return-driven venture capital strategy to pursue opportunities that will GPEC assumed a of its research and call campaign structure By organizing and communicating lead to a cluster of new competencies in the region Within two years greater role in leading intelligence GPEC will support public-sector partners in identifying companies these efforts may manifest into suggested changes in tax policy, the conversation about that are primed to expand or contract referendum items or a bond initiative Arizona's competitiveness with policy makers The effort Work with Communities to Develop Competitiveness Programs Identify Areas for Federal level Consideration to pass Senate Bill 1041 Through research OPEC will explore economic opportunities for Building on policy experience and research on incentives best practices in the legislature required the region that might benefit from a concerted effort with Arizona's OPEC will partner with municipalities to design economic development programs broad shoulders and fixed Congressional delegation Potential areas could include the attraction determination—both of which at the local level OPEC will help communities meet their respective individual of national labs that align with the region's core competencies as well were effectively demonstrated objectives while following sound economic development principles as the retention of the aerospace and defense industries GPEC will by GPEC stakeholders and its Continue Monitoring Competitiveness consider routine meetings with Congressional representatives while in partners Arizona and also serve as a resource to partners who have an existing OPEC will continue to assess the competitive landscape of state and local federal agenda in place incentives that target the reduction of capital and operation costs in the Mountain i West region OPEC will evaluate the feasibility of a tool that will enable modeling • capabilities for project specific analyses and economic development policies The Economic Development Drives These FY12 Metrics .lobs Program was launched to attrach high-tech •Pipeline of qualified prospects manufacturing and corporate •Pipeline of international prospects headquarter jobs to Greater r Phoenix •Total number of jobs created • •Number of high-wage jobs created •Average high-wage salary •Emerging technology assists •Competitive pe postition progress J <____:. A New Horizon: Vision and ProdiTs,,~s j0 Gafc FY2012 4,e,o„nip 14. A New Horizon: and 'uy Greater Phoenix ECONOMIC COUNCIL 2 N Central Ave Suite 2500 Phoenix AZ 85004 602.256 7700 www.gpec.org EXHIBIT B GPEC PERFORMANCE MEASURES FY 2011-2012 Specific performance targets as established by the GPEC Executive Committee and Board of Directors: 1. Payroll Generated $168.7M 2. Total Number of Jobs Created 4,005 3. Total Number of High-Wage Jobs 1,701 4. Average High-Wage Salary $47,398 5. Emerging Tech Assists 8 6. Number of Qualified Prospects 187 7. Number of Qualified International Prospects 28 8. Total Reach of Editorial Placements/Exposures 99M GPEC continues to target high-wage industnes(advanced business services,aerospace,life sciences,renewable energy,high-tech/IT) EXHIBIT C TARGETED INDUSTRIES FY2011-2012 GPEC and our member communities have identified targeted industries on a local and regional level,mcorporatmg these industries into a regional economic development plan For fiscal year 2011-2012,GPEC will continue its emphasis on the following•advanced business services,aerospace/aviation,hfe science,high tech/IT and renewable energy OIN Member communities will target the following Apache Junction Business services,environmental technologies research and manufacturing,standard and advanced manufacturing; regional and corporate centers,medical institutions and/or associated satellite operations;mining support facilities, resort/tounst-oriented development,filmmaking(location shooting),expanded retail opportunities Avondale Advanced business services/information technology,renewable energies,Bio/medical/hfe sciences,manufacturing, higher education/hfelong learning,amateur sports and tourism Buckeye Advanced business services,renewable energy,high tech(data center and services),environmental technology/ sustainability,standard manufacturing,medical and educational institutions,transportation/distribution;small business/incubator Casa Grande Aviation/aerospace,biosciences and sustainabihty,corporate/regional headquarters,healthcare and medical services,standard manufacturing and transportation and distribution Chandler Advanced Business Services;corporate/regional headquarters,high-tech electronics and software development, aerospace/aviation and advanced materials,biosciences and sustainability. Fountain Hills Advanced business services,life science,high-tech/IT,renewable energy,post-secondary institutions,tourism Gila Bend Clean technology(manufacturing/central station generation/R&D),warehousing/transportation/distribution,military supply chain,tourism/hospitality,standard manufacturing,agnculture/agn-biotechnology,food,fiber and natural products,aerospace/aviation Gilbert Advanced business services;high-tech/software(R&D,data center and services),high-tech/next generation electronics,aerospace R&D/aviation,bioscience(research,drug development,treatment,medical diagnosis), corporate/regional headquarters;and sustainabihty(environmental) Glendale Aviation/aerospace;software development,sports and entertainment,high-tech consultants;research and development,defense,financial services and insurance headquarters,resorts,healthcare and medical services, engineering and architectural Goodyear Advance financial/business services,high-tech electronics and software development,aerospace/aviation,advanced materials,biosciences(treatment,medical diagnostics,research)and senior industries;food,fiber and natural products,transportation/distnbution,standard manufacturing,environmental technology,sustainabihty Page 1 of 2 Maricopa(City) Business services and software,high-tech electromcs,aerospace and advanced materials,agn-bio, transportation/distribution,standard manufacturing,environmental technology Mancopa County Food,fiber and natural products,transportation/distribution,standard manufacturing,environmental technology Mesa Primary Target Industries. Healthcare,Education,Aerospace and Tourism Secondary target industnes•Advanced business services,regional and corporate centers,environmental technology, research&development,bioscience,sustainabihty Peoria Business services,information technology;healthcare technology and advanced medical services;educational institutions;standard manufacturing,environmental technology Phoenix Advance business services,aerospace and defense materials,bioscience,high tech/IT,renewable energy Queen Creek Aerospace and aviation;health and wellness,advanced financial/business services,arts,culture and experience, education Scottsdale Advanced business services(financial services),bioscience(research,drug development,treatment,medical products),high-tech/software,sustainabihty(environmental);corporate/regional headquarters Surprise Environmental technology;advanced medical services,biotech,education and healthcare,transportation and distribution Tempe Advanced business services(financial services), high tech/software(R&D,data center and services),high-tech/next generation electronics,aerospace R&D/aviation;bioscience(research,drug development,treatment,medical diagnostics);corporate/regional headquarters,sustainabihty(environmental);advanced matenals/plastics;senior industries Tolleson Aerospace and advanced materials;food,fiber and natural products,transportation/distribution,standard manufacturing,environmental technology,sustainabihty Wickenburg Transportation/distribution,standard manufacturing,environmental technology,food,fiber&natural products, advanced business services Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT D FY 2011-2012 REPORTING MECHANISM FOR CONTRACT FULFILLMENT Monthly Activity Report - Month, Year BUSINESS ATTRACTION PERFORMANCE METRICS: GPEC Progress Toward Goals Annual Contract Actual Goal %of Targeted Opportunities Goal YTD YTD Goal YTD PAYROLL GENERATED(MILLIONS) AVERAGE HIGH WAGE SALARY NUMBER OF JOBS NUMBER OF HIGH-WAGE JOBS EMERGING TECHNOLOGY ASSISTS QUALIFIED PROSPECTS INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTS TOTAL REACH OF EDITORIAL PLACEMENTS GPEC continues to target high-wage industries(advanced business services,aerospace,life sciences,renewable energy,high-tech/TI) KEY BUSINESS ATTRACTION ACTIVITIES AND OTHER GPEC ACTIVITIES Page 1 of 1 eiN EXHIBIT E INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The City's insurance requirements are minimum requirements for this Agreement and In no way limit the indemnity covenants contained in this Agreement. The City in no way warrants that the minimum limits required of GPEC are sufficient to protect GPEC from liabilities that might arise out of this Agreement for GPEC, its agents, representatives, employees or Contractors and GPEC is free to purchase such additional insurance as may be determined necessary. A. Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance. GPEC shall provide coverage at least as broad as the categones set forth below with limits of liability in amounts acceptable to the City. 1. Commercial General Liability - Occurrence Form (Form CG 0001, ed 10/93 or any replacements thereof) General Aggregate/per Project Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Personal& Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage (Any one fire) Directors and Officers Medical Expense (Any one person) Optional 2. Automobile Liability -Any Auto or Owned, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles (Form CA 0001, ed. 12/93 or any replacement thereof) Combined Single Limit Per Accident for Bodily Injury and Property Damage 3. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Workers' Compensation Statutory Employers'Liability B. Self-insured Retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City If not approved, the City may request that the insurer reduce or eliminate such self-insured retentions with respect to City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers Page 1 of 3 C. Other Insurance Requirements. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions 1. Commercial General Liability a. The City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of. activities performed by or on behalf of GPEC, including the City's general /"1 supervision of GPEC; products and completed operations of GPEC, and automobiles owned,leased,hired or borrowed by GPEC. b GPEC's insurance shall include broad form contractual liability coverage c The City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers shall be additional insureds to the full limits of liability purchased by GPEC, even if those limits of liability are in excess of those required by this Agreement. d GPEC's insurance coverage shall be pnmary insurance with respect to City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of GPEC's insurance and shall not contribute to it. e. GPEC's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. f Coverage provided by GPEC shall not be limited to the hability assumed under the indemnification provisions of this Agreement g The policies shall contain a waiver of subrogation against City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by GPEC for the City 2. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all nghts of subrogation against City, its officers, officials, agents, employees and volunteers for any and all losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the City Page 2 of 3 D. Notice of Cancellation. Each insurance policy required by the insurance provisions of this Agreement shall provide the required coverage and shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been sent to City at the address provided herein for the giving of notice. Such notice shall be by certified mail, return receipt requested. /1 E. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers duly licensed or approved unlicensed companies in the State of Arizona and with a "Best's" rating of not less than A-:VII. City in no way warrants that the above required minimum insurer rating is sufficient to protect GPEC from potential insurer insolvency F. Verification of Coverage GPEC shall furnish Citywith Certificates of g Insurance (ACORD form or equivalent approved by City) and with ongmal endorsements effecting coverage as required by this Agreement. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. Any pohcy endorsements that restrict or limit coverage shall be clearly noted on the Certificate of Insurance All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by City before work commences. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement must be in effect at or prior to commencement of work under this Agreement and remain in effect for the duration of the project. All certificates of insurance required by this Agreement shall be sent directly to City at the address and in the manner provided in this Agreement for the giving of notice. City's Agreement/Agreement number, GPEC's name and description of the Agreement shall be provided on the Certificates of Insurance. City reserves the right to require complete certified copies of all insurance policies required by this Agreement, at any time. G. Approval. During the term of this Agreement, no modification may be made to any of GPEC's insurance policies which will reduce the nature, scope or limits of coverage which were in effect and approved by the City prior to execution of this Agreement Page 3 of 3 gACHp • �G City of Apache junction U,. 2 time o/'the ,S upei:cI tion liountams 4 PIIOt%"` Print Am. TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Bryant Powell, Assistant City Manager DATE: June 20, 2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Communication/Outreach TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: PRESENTATION BY AND DISCUSSION WITH PAUL PECORA, SENIOR MANAGER, OR A REPRESENTATIVE OF MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS, REGARDING UPDATE ON MEDIACOM OUTREACH AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. ACTION REQUESTED: Information Only (No discussion) DISCUSSION /BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Paul Pecora, Senior Manager, Area Operations-Arizona, or a representative of Mediacom Communications will provide an update on Mediacom's community outreach and recent developments FISCAL IMPACT. OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download No Attachments Available 1 gpACH G � City of Apache Junct • ion u z� Home of the .Super:y/ition :l1arrn/ain.y 4 PrzooP• Print �► TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Shane Kiesow, Public Works Manager DATE: June 20, 2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Community Infrastructure TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MARICOPA COUNTY FOR FIRE PRE-EMPTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE ON COUNTY OWNED TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTHERN AVENUE AND MERIDIAN DRIVE. ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Presentation and discussion on an intergovernmental agreement between Maricopa County and the City of Apache Junction for fire pre-emption equipment installation and maintenance on county owned traffic signals at the intersection of Southern Avenue and Meridian Drive r•. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted Expenditure OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: Consideration/discussion/approval ATTACHMENTS Click to download ❑ Memo to Council u Resolution No. 11-25 4 PpAcfi v 2 Public Works Department eay 0/14/44e4 Home of the Superstition Mountains Date. June 9, 2011 To. Mayor and Members of the City Council Through George Hoffman, City Manager Giao Pham, Interim Public Works Director From Shane Kiesow, Public Works Manager Subject Intergovernmental Agreement with Mancopa County The City has requested that fire pre-emption equipment be installed on a County owned traffic signal at the intersection of Southern Avenue and Meridian Road to accommodate the City's emergency services and the City may request such installations of Equipment on additional Traffic Signals in the future. Both Parties recognize that the installation of this Equipment is beneficial to the travelling public and area residents. The cost for the Equipment at any existing or future Traffic Signal within the City will be the responsibility of the City. Mancopa County and City staff developed the enclosed IGA for City Council's consideration as a continuance of this effort. 575 E Baseline Avenue, Apache Junction, AZ 85219 • Voice (480) 982-1055 • FAX (480) 983-5752 or (480) 982-8005 RESOLUTION NO 11-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MARICOPA COUNTY (DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) FOR FIRE PREEMPTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE ON COUNTY OWNED SIGNALS . WHEREAS, A.R. S. § 11-951 and 28-6701 et seq. authorize Maricopa County (the "County") to layout, maintain, control and manage public roads within the County; and WHEREAS, A.R. S . § 11-951 et seq. authorizes public agencies to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the provision of services or for joint or cooperative action; and WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction (the "City") has requested that fire preemption equipment (the "Equipment") be installed on a County owned traffic signal (the "Traffic Signal") to accommodate the City' s emergency services and the City may request such installations of Equipment on additional Traffic Signals in the future; and WHEREAS, both the City and the County recognize that the installation of this Equipment is beneficial to the traveling public and area residents; and WHEREAS, the cost for the Equipment at any existing or future Traffic Signal within the City will be the responsibility of the City; and p WHEREAS, if the County is installing a new Traffic Signal or modifying an existing one, the County may install the Equipment to the Traffic Signal, if requested and supplied by the City; and WHEREAS, if the County is not installing a new Traffic Signal or modifying an existing one and the City wants the Equipment added to an existing Traffic Signal, the County may allow the City to install the Equipment on Traffic Signals provided certain criteria are met, as stated below in the terms of the agreement; and RESOLUTION NO. 11-25 Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to identify and define both the City' s and the County' s respective obligations and responsibilities concerning the installation and maintenance of Equipment on Traffic Signals in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AS FOLLOWS: 1) The Mayor and City Council approve the intergovernmental agreement between the City and the County, attached hereto as Attachment A, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. 2) The City Manager or his designee is authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF . SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2011 JOHN S. INSALACO Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY /01 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: RICHARD J. STERN City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 11-25 Page 2 of 2 r INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN MARICOPA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR FIRE PRE-EMPTION EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE ON COUNTY OWNED TRAFFIC SIGNALS (C-91-11- -M-00) This Intergovernmental Agreement (Agreement) is between the County of Maricopa, a political subdivision of the State, acting through the Maricopa County Department of Transportation ("County"), and the City of Apache Junction, a municipal corporation ("City"). The County and City are collectively referred to as the Parties or individually as a Party. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it is approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION 1 A R S §11-251 and §§28-6701 et seq. authorize the County to layout, maintain, control and manage public roads within the County 2. A.R.S §§11-951 et seq. authorize public agencies to enter into Intergovernmental Agreements for the provision of services or for joint or cooperative action BACKGROUND 3. The City has requested that fire pre-emption equipment ("Equipment") be installed on a County owned traffic signal ("Traffic Signal") to accommodate the City's emergency services and the City may request such installations of Equipment on additional Traffic Signals in the future 4 Both Parties recognize that the installation of this Equipment is beneficial to the travelling public and area residents. Page 1 of 6 5. The cost for the Equipment at any existing or future Traffic Signal within the City will be the responsibility of the City 6 If the County is installing a new Traffic Signal or modifying an existing one, the County may install the Equipment to the Traffic Signal, if requested and supplied by the City. 7. If the County is not installing a new Traffic Signal or modifying an existing one and the City wants the Equipment added to an existing Traffic Signal, the County may allow the City to install the Equipment on Traffic Signals provided certain criteria are met, as /'N stated below in the terms of the agreement PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT 8. The purpose of this Agreement is to identify and define both Parties' respective obligations and responsibilities concerning the installation and maintenance of Equipment on Traffic Signals in the City TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT 9 Responsibilities of the County: 9.1 The County shall allow the City to install the Equipment to the Traffic Signals provided the criteria as identified below in paragraph 10 1, items i through iv, are met. 9.2 The County shall issue a no cost permit to the City for the installation of the Equipment on the Traffic Signals. 9 3 The County shall review the Equipment installation plans submitted by the City and provide comments back within 15 working days from receipt of copies 9 4 The County shall provide maintenance for the Equipment installed on the Traffic Signals. If additional parts are needed, the City, at its expense, will provide the necessary parts to the County. 9 5 The County shall notify the City of any scheduled inspection to the Traffic Signal and shall permit a Traffic Signal Maintenance Technician II from the City to accompany the County's inspection technician during the inspection 9.6 The County shall retain ownership of and responsibility for the Traffic Signals 10. Responsibilities of the City: 10.1 The City shall install the Equipment to the Traffic Signals under the following conditions: i. The City shall use qualified contractors or qualified City traffic signal technicians to install the Equipment All signal technicians will have at least an 1MSA Level 2 traffic signal technician certification. Page 2 of 6 ii. The City shall ensure that the Equipment is compatible with the Traffic Signals and controllers The City shall be responsible for the cost of the Equipment and its installation. iv. The City shall accept all liability associated with the Equipment and its use 10.2 The City shall provide the Equipment to the County for installation during construction of a new or upgraded Traffic Signal. 10 3 The City shall incur all costs for the Equipment on new or existing Traffic Signals whether installed by the City, its contractors or the County 10.4 The City shall obtain a no cost permit from the County prior to installation when Equipment is installed by the City. 10 5 The City shall submit copies of the Equipment installation plans to the County for review and approval. 10.6 The City shall provide, at the City's expense, all necessary parts to the County for routine maintenance of the Equipment on the Traffic Signals. 10 7 The City shall provide a Traffic Signal Maintenance Technician II to accompany the County's inspection technician during any scheduled inspection GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 11 By entering into this Agreement, the Parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, each Party will defend, indemnify and save the other Parties harmless, including any of the Parties' departments, agencies, officers, employees, elected officials or agents, from and against all loss, expense, damage or claim of any nature whatsoever which is caused by any activity, condition or event arising out of the performance or nonperformance by the indemnifying Party of any of the provisions of this Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, each Party indemnifies the other against all liability, losses and damages of any nature for or on account of any injuries or death of persons or damages to or destruction of property arising out of or in any way connected with the performance or nonperformance of this Agreement, except such injury or damage as shall have been occasioned by the negligence of that other Party The damages which are the subject of this indemnity shall include but not be limited to the damages incurred by any Party, its departments, agencies, officers, employees, elected officials or agents. In the event of an action, the damages which are the subject of this indemnity shall include costs, expenses of litigation and reasonable attorney's fees. 12 This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it is approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and may be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder, and remain in full force and effect until all stipulations previously indicated have been satisfied except that it may be amended upon written Agreement by all Parties. Any Party may terminate this Agreement upon furnishing the other Parties with a written notice at least sixty (60) days prior to the effective termination date Page 3 of 6 contingent upon being budgeted and appropriated by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and the Apache Junction City Council in such fiscal year. 22. This Agreement has been arrived at by negotiation and shall not be construed against any Party or against the Party who prepared the last draft 23. Unless otherwise lawfully terminated by the Parties, this Agreement shall be set for a term not longer than ten years, unless both Parties agree to extend or terminate the Agreement. 24. All notices and demands between the Parties under this Agreement are effective upon receipt and shall be in writing and hand-delivered or sent by prepaid certified mail, return receipt requested, through the United States Postal Service to the following. County. MCDOT Government Relations 2901 West Durango Street Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Phone 602-506-8672 City: City of Apache Junction Attn: Public Works Director 575 East Baseline Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 8511 Phone 602-506-8672 End of Agreement- Signature Page Follows #ti Page 5 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement. MARICOPA COUNTY CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Recommended By: Recommended By: J n Hauskins, P.E. Date George Hoffman Date Tra ortation Director City Manager Approved and Accepted By: Approved and Accepted By: Andrew Kunasek Date John S. lnsalaco Date Chairman, Board of Supervisors City Mayor Attest By: Attest By: Fran McCarroll Date Kathy Connelly Date Clerk of the Board City Clerk APPROVAL OF ATTORNEY FOR COUNTY AND CITY ATTORNEY I hereby state that I have reviewed the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement and declare the Agreement to be in proper form and within the powers and authority granted to the Parties by their respective governing bodies under the laws of the State of Arizona. David Benton Date R J Stern Date Attorney for County City Attorney Page 6 of 6 /M. Pp ACHE.je, • 0o City of Apache Junction Home oJ`the .S upentrtron Mountains 1 PizOt* Print Ai. TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Emile Schmid, Senior Project Engineer, on behalf of Giao Pham, Interim Public Works Director DATE June 20, 2011 Agenda Type • Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Community Infrastructure TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON ENTERING INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE UTILIZATION OF UNOBLIGATED SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS. ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Presentation and discussion on entering into an intergovernmental agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation for Highway Safety Improvement Program Grant Money FISCAL IMPACT. p OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: Consideration/discussion/approval ATTACHMENTS: Click to download O Memo to Council 0 Resolution No 11-26 THERE IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM IN THE REGULAR MEETING SECTION UNDER ITEM ' •� *pACHF�GZ `o City Q Apache Junc ion U . z lime of the Superstition Mountains 4Prros* rIS Print *-�► TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager DATE: June 20, 2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Revenue Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE INDIAN COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION / BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the June 6, 2011 City Council Work Session, staff presented a number of documents to the council regarding the possible city sponsorship of non-profit organizations for the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program. The proposed policies that were provided to council contained an error Staff will be reviewing with the council the corrections needed to that document Also, staff will answer any additional questions about the proposed policies. .m. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: Policy Discussion (list specific options/alternatives) RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that the Council review and discuss the corrected policies In addition, staff requests that the Council discuss any additional questions or concerns regarding the proposed policies ATTACHMENTS: Click to download L] Staff Report L] Sponsorship Policies Corrected Version - 10111k • City of Apache Junction qA o�P Development Services Department MEMORANDUM DATE• June 9, 2011 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council THROUGH• George Hoffman, City Manager Brad Steinke, Development Services Director FROM. Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager SUBJECT. Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program REQUEST Staff respectfully requests that the City Council review and discuss corrections to the proposed policies governing the City's "sponsorship" of local nonprofit organizations for participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program. The policies provided to Council for the June 6, 2011 work session inadvertently contained an error. See Attachment 1 for a copy of the corrected document, the correction is noted on Page 4 of the document. Staff also respectfully requests that the City Council discuss any additional questions/concerns regarding the proposed policies BACKGROUND During the April 18, 2011 City Council work session, City staff gave an update regarding the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program As noted in the presentation, Proposition 202 stipulated that local nonprofit organizations may apply for Program funds if"sponsored" by an appropriate municipality. Council asked staff to return to a future meeting to formally seek direction regarding this matter. During the May 3, 2011 City Council meeting, City staff was given the directive to prepare a draft of policies governing the City's "sponsorship" of local nonprofit organizations for participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program During the June 6, 2011 City Council meeting, City staff presented to the Council • Proposed policies governing sponsorship of a nonprofit organization. • Sample of an intergovernmental agreement ("IGA") executed between a tribal entity and a pass through municipality. • Draft grant pass through agreement that could be used between the City and a nonprofit when an IGA is not executed between the tribal entity and a pass through municipality • Draft resolution that could be used by the City when sponsoring a nonprofit agency. DISCUSSION Staff felt it important that the Council. 1) have the opportunity to review the corrections to the document and 2) be given another opportunity to discuss the sponsorship of nonprofit organizations for participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends that Council: 1) review and discuss the corrections to the proposed policies and 2) discuss with staff any additional questions/concerns regarding the proposed policies ACTION REQUIRED Review and discussion of the changes to the proposed policies. Discussion of any additional questions/concerns regarding the proposed policies. Attachment 1 Proposed Policies. Corrected Version Page 2 ( CHEJ��,h hi:z City Council Report: Attachment 1 4RIZONP CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA INDIAN COMMUNITY STATE SHARED REVENUE PROGRAM. LOCAL NONPROFIT PARTICIPATION As Adopted by the City Council on PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT The purpose of this document is to delineate cntena which the City may utilize to determine "sponsorship" of a nonprofit organization for participation in the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program BACKGROUND In November 2002, the voters of Arizona approved Proposition 202 which initiated new gaming compacts between the State of Arizona and the Native American communities An important provision of Proposition 202 was the sharing of gaming revenues with the State Henceforth, tribes would be assessed by the State a percentage of their gross gaming revenue. Tribes had the option of either paying all of this assessment into a State managed fund or to pay 88% of the assessment into the State managed fund and retain 12% of the assessment for distribution as grants Several Native American communities (e.g Gila River Indian, Ak-Chin, Fort Mc Dowell _. Yavapai) exercised their option to retain and administer 12% of State shared revenue. Known as the Indian Community State Shared Revenue Program, the Program makes "Distributions to cities, towns, or counties for government services that benefit the general public, including public safety, mitigation of the impacts of gaming, or promotion of commerce and economic development " Typical tribal funding priorities include 1) public safety (police, fire, ems), 2) transportation, 3) health care services; 4) economic and/or community development, 5) education, and 6) environment The law also stipulates that local nonprofits may submit applications to tribal entities if the nonprofit organization is "sponsored" by an appropriate municipality. In such cases, the municipality agrees to act as a pass through for the grant funds The municipality receives the grant funds from the tribal entity and in turn issues a check to the nonprofit agency Page 1 of 4 Communities choose to support nonprofit tribal grant applications because. 1) the law stipulates this role for municipalities; 2) it is a way to address local needs that government cannot (e.g. social services), 3) it is a way to assist local nonprofits, and 4) it is considered being a "good neighbor" Some tribal entities formalize the relationship between themselves and the pass through municipality by using an Intergovernmental Agreement (e g Fort Mc Dowell Yavapai Nation) See Addendum 1 Other tribal communities (e g. Gila River Indian Community) do not formalize this relationship rather they encourage the pass through municipality and the nonprofit organization to develop their own contractual agreement if so desired. See Addendum 2 for a sample Intergovernmental Agreement that the City could utilize. CRITERIA I CONSIDERATION FOR SPONSORSHIP An organization may be considered for sponsorship by the City Council if it is legally recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as a 501 (c) 3 organization, is in good standing in the City (e g current business license), provides a service to the residents of Apache Junction, and has a physical presence in the community (e g branch office, satellite office) II. NON COMPETE An organization may be considered for sponsorship if its grant application is not determined by City staff to be in competition with an application to be submitted by the City to the same tribal community during the same funding cycle 111 PROCESS TO BE UTILIZED a. Grant Initiated by Nonprofit Organization An organization wishing to be sponsored by the City should initiate contact with the City's Revenue Resources Manager The organization will provide information as requested by the Manager in a timely fashion so that the necessary City Council reports may be prepared. The Revenue Resources Manager will present to the City Council a report summarizing the organizations seeking sponsorship, the projects to be funded, and a recommendation on whether or not to sponsor the agency This information will be presented to the City Council during regularly scheduled work session(s) and City Council Meeting(s) The ultimate decision on sponsorship rests with the City Council As directed by the Page 2 of 4 tribal communities, sponsorship will be determined by the adoption of a City Council resolution authorizing the submission of the grant application under the auspices of Apache Junction See Addendum 3 for a sample resolution. b Grant Initiated by an Indian Community Some Indian Communities accept grant applications only by invitation (e g Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community). In such cases, the Indian Community requests a nonprofit to submit a grant application that addresses a priority area of the Community, such applications still must be submitted through a sponsoring municipality If a nonprofit is requested by an Indian Community to submit a grant application that will address a need of the residents of Apache Junction, the City's Revenue Resources Manager will work with the Indian Community and the City Council to facilitate the honoring of that request. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City staff will meet with an agency requesting sponsorship to determine if the agency 1) serves Apache Junction residents; 2) addresses an identified community need, 3) maintains necessary City registration(s), and 4) maintains Directors and Operators Insurance coverage (See Section V) Based upon this information, staff will prepare a recommendation of sponsor/do not sponsor and submit to the City Council for consideration. V DIRECTORS AND OPERATORS LIABILITY INSURANCE It is a good business practice for a nonprofit to maintain a Directors and Operators Liability Insurance Policy as part of its insurance package Such a policy protects the agency against allegations of wrongful acts or decisions that result in a financial loss Nonprofit agencies seeking "sponsorship" by the City are encouraged to maintain such a policy and to name the City of Apache Junction as a co-insured An agency's financial inability to maintain such a policy will not eliminate an organization from consideration for sponsorship. VI ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS The City will incur some administrative costs (e g staff time) for sponsoring a nonprofit organization City staff will discuss with representatives of the nonprofit organization these costs and the possible reimbursement of them. Inability to reimburse the City for these administrative costs will not eliminate an organization from consideration for sponsorship Page 3 of 4 VII LIABILITY As noted earlier, some tribal entities execute Intergovernmental Agreements ("IGAs") between itself and the pass through municipalities. Such IGAs typically have language which holds the municipalities harmless for any malfeasances with the funds to be granted When possible, the City will execute an IGA with the tribal community See Attachment 1 AMOR When an IGA is not utilized by the funder, the City will execute an-IGA a Grant Pass Through Agreement with the nonprofit receiving funds. See Addendum 2. VIII MALFEASANCE Because its role is limited to that of a financial pass through, the City has no responsibility for the re-cooping of grant funds or the pursuit of legal remedies should malfeasance by the funded nonprofit organization occur during the life of a grant contract Financial malfeasance would be covered by a standard Directors and Operators Liability Insurance Policy Malfeasance on the part of a nonprofit organization will preclude City sponsorship in future funding cycles. Page 4 of 4 04PpACH sy G pity o ipache junction Home©me o/the Super:rh/rr�n ;'�l otter/cans 4Pizoo* Print TO City Manager's Office FROM: Roger S. Hacker DATE: June 20, 2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Economic Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 11-30 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF AN ELECTRONIC COMMUNITY MARQUEE ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Resolution No. 11-30 authorizes the submission of a grant application to the Gila River Indian Community for the acquisition of an electronic community message marquee The resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$50,000, the city would provide up to $10,000 of cash as match. FISCAL IMPACT: Budgeted Expenditure OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES Policy Discussion (list specific options/alternatives) RECOMMENDATION: Council can 1 Support this project moving forward in the grant application process 2 Not support this project moving forward in the grant process ATTACHMENTS: Click to download L] Staff Report L7 Resolution Number 11-30 D Project Summary THERE IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM IN THE REGULAR MEETING SECTION UNDER ITEM 1 po Cityo ace Junction U Z Home of the .S uper:y/itzon A orrtr/wins 1Zoi4P' 111 Print '" TO: City Manager's Office FROM Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager DATE• June 20, 2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area• Revenue Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 11-23 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR SUPPORT OF THE CITY'S FIT FAMILIES PROGRAM. ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Resolution No 11-23 authorizes the submission of a grant application to the Gila River Indian Community for support of the City's Fit Families Program The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application. The grant request is for$35,900; the city would provide up to $31,484 of in-kind services as match. FISCAL IMPACT Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: Policy Discussion (list specific options/alternatives) RECOMMENDATION Council can. 1. Support Fit Families moving forward in the grant application process 2 Not support Fit Families moving forward in the grant process ATTACHMENTS. Click to download t] Staff Report L] Resolution Number 11-23 d Project Summary THERE IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM IN THE REGULAR MEETING SECTION UNDER ITEM ,� .•. � PpACHf�Gy 1 City of f Apache Junction v z Home of the .Y uper:►/rtron .1, ountain s A,�rza14r '--Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Roger S Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager DATE- June 20,2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Community Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 11-33 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION BY THE CITY ON BEHALF OF EMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR SUPPORT OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE OUTREACH PROGRAM AT EMPOWERMENT SYSTEM'S CENTER. ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Resolution No 11-33 authorizes the submission of a grant application by the city on behalf of Empowerment Systems to the Gila River Indian Community for support of the Health Insurance Outreach Program at the Empowerment Center. The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$50,000, Empowerment Systems would provide up to$136,756 of in-kind services as match FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required d . OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES. Policy Discussion (list specific options/alternatives) RECOMMENDATION. Council can 1. Support this project moving forward in the grant application process 2 Not support this project moving forward in the grant process ATTACHMENTS- Click to download ❑ Staff Report ❑ Resolution Number 11 33 t7 Protect Summary THERE IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM IN THE REGULAR MEETING SECTION UNDER ITEM � Q üiy of A ache Junction o Home of the .S u er:l/itior? Mountains 1PrzooP. AeS Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: Roger S. Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager DATE: June 20, 2011 Agenda Type Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: Revenue Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM: PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 11-24 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A MAJOR CRIMES EVIDENCE RECOVERY SQUAD ACTION REQUESTED: Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Resolution No 11-24 authorizes the submission of a grant application to the Gila River Indian Community for the acquisition of a major crimes evidence recovery squad. The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$38,685,the city would provide up to $7,340 of cash and equipment as match FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: Policy Discussion (list specific options/alternatives) RECOMMENDATION. Council can. 1. Support this project moving forward in the grant application process 2 Not support this project moving forward in the grant process ATTACHMENTS: Click to download D Staff Report L] Resolution Number 11 24 0 Project Summary THERE IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM IN THE REGULAR MEETING SECTION UNDER ITEM I to, H �G City a 1 pache Junction U' 2 1 l ome o/ the .S u per:c/rtrorr .'l l ouartains dp,2o10' �-�Print TO. City Manager's Office FROM: Roger S Hacker, Revenue Resources Manager DATE: June 20,2011 Agenda Type . Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area. Community Development TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 11-31 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION BY THE CITY ON BEHALF OF EAST VALLEY ADULT RESOURCES TO THE GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY FOR SUPPORT OF THE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AT THE APACHE JUNCTION ACTIVE ADULT CENTER. ACTION REQUESTED- Presentation and Discussion DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Resolution No 11-31 authorizes the submission of a grant application by the city on behalf of East Valley Adult Resources to the Gila River Indian Community for support of the Transportation Program at the Apache Junction Active Adult Center. The Resolution is a mandated component of the grant application The grant request is for$45,000, East Valley Adult Resources would provide up to$43,261 as match FISCAL IMPACT: Budgetary Approval Not Required OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES. Policy Discussion (list specific options/alternatives) RECOMMENDATION. Council can• 1 Support this project moving forward in the grant application process 2 Not support this project moving forward in the grant process ATTACHMENTS- Click to download ❑ Staff Report ❑ Resolution Number 11-31 l] Proiect Summary THERE IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM IN THE REGULAR MEETING SECTION UNDER ITEM -2 PphCH ✓0 City of Apache Junction Home o f the Supet:ciition :Wolin/ants Print TO: City Manager's Office FROM: George Hoffman, City Manager DATE: June 20, 2011 Agenda Type : Work Session Agenda Council Priority Focus Area: TITLE OF AGENDA ITEM. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSED TENTATIVE FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 CITY BUDGET ACTION REQUESTED: DISCUSSION/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION FISCAL IMPACT: „sm.. OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Click to download No Attachments Available