The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013 11.18 City Council Work Session Agenda i it. Cit011oy of Apache Junction, Arizona Meeting location Cli City Council Chambers at City Hall Agenda 300 E Superstition Blvd / g Apache Junction,AZ . 85119 City Council Work Session www ajcity net Ph (480)982-8002 Monday,November 18,2013 7.00 PM City Council Chambers �... A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. AGENDA ITEMS 1. Presentation and discussion of the draft development fee land use assumptions, Infrastructure improvement plan and project schedule Presentation and discussion 2. Presentation and discussion on Resolution No 13-39, a resolution of the mayor and city council authorizing the city to enter into an intergovernmental agreement with Pinal County Flood Control District for the construction of the Broadway Avenue /Delaware Drive intersection drainage improvements Presentation and Discussion 3. Presentation and discussion on the second amendment to the lease agreement between Verizon Wireless and the City of Apache Junction for location of communication equipment on city property Presentation and discussion. 4. Discussion on the FY 2013-2014 Legislative Work Plan item entitled "Coordination of Economic Development Efforts"and marketing of the city Discussion. 5. Presentation and discussion on ghost calls and customer service provided by CenturyLink Presentation and discussion. D. ADJOURNMENT Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained Monday through Thursdays, 7 OOa—6 OOp, excluding holidays, from the City Clerk's office located at 300 East Superstition Boulevard, Apache Junction, AZ If any person with a disability needs any type of accommodation, please notify the Human Resources Office, at(480)474-2617 or(480)983-0095(TDD)at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled time City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 11/13/2013 DRAFT - DEVELOPMENT FEE STUDY: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT FEES Prepared for City of Apache Junction, Arizona November 13, 2013 lischlerEise Fiscal Economic& Planning Consultants 4701 Sangamore Road, Suite S240 Bethesda, MD 301 320.6900 www.tischlerbise corn DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] TischlerB;s: DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Arizona Development Fee Enabling Legislation 3 Necessary Public Services 4 Infrastructure Improvements Plan. 4 Qualified Professionals 5 Development Fees 6 Calculation Methodologies. . 6 Reporting Results 6 Proposed Development Fees 7 Comparison to Current Development Fees 8 Library Facilities Infrastructure Improvements Plan 9 Overview 9 Service Area 9 Proportionate Share. 9 IIP for Library Facilities . ..••• •• 9 Analysis of Capacity, Usage,and Costs of existing public services 10 Level of Service 10 Cost per Demand Unit 11 Ratio of Service unit to development unit . 12 Projected Service Units and Infrastructure Demand 12 Library Facilities Improvements Plan 13 Maximum Supportable Library Facilities Development Fees . . 14 Cash Flow Analysis 15 Parks and Recreational Facilities Infrastructure Improvements Plan 17 Overview 17 Service Area • .. .... .. . 17 Proportionate Share ....•... ... 17 IIP for Parks and Recreational Facilities . •••• 17 Analysis of Capacity, Usage,and Costs of existing public services 18 Parkland .• 19 Park Improvements 20 Recreational Facilities 21 Multi-Use Trails 22 Ratio of Service unit to development unit . 23 Projected Demand for Services And Costs 23 Parks and Recreational Facilities Improvements Plan 25 Maximum Supportable Parks and Recreational Facilities Development Fees ... . 26 Cash Flow Analysis 27 Police Facilities Infrastructure Improvements Plan 29 Overview .. 29 Service Area 29 Proportionate Share... 29 Functional Population 29 Demand Units 31 1 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona PS Pohce Calls for Service 31 1 IIP For Police Facilities .32 Analysis of Capacity, Usage,and Costs of existing public cervices 32 Vehicles 33 Communications Equipment . .. 34 Ratio of Service unit to development unit 35 Projected Demand for Services And Costs ... ... . 36 Police Facilities Improvements Plan 38 Maximum Supportable Police Facilities Development Fees 39 Cash Flow Analysis . . 40 Street Facilities Infrastructure Improvements Plan 41 Overview 41 Service Area . .. .... .41 Proportionate Share . . 43 IIP For Street Facilities . 43 Analysts of Capacity, Usage,and Costs of existing public services 43 Current Inventory .44 Trip Generation Rates . . 45 Lane Capacity 48 Current Level of Service 48 Cost per Lane Mile 52 Ratio of Service Unit to Land Use .... 54 Projected Demand for Services And Costs .56 Minor Arterials 56 Collectors 57 Signalized Intersections 59 Street Facilities Improvements Plan ... 61 Maximum Supportable Street Facilities Development Fees ... 62 Cash Flow Analysts ... ... 63 IIP and Development Fee Report Costs.... 64 Revenue Strategy and Required Offset Analysis 65 Appendix A-Land Use Assumptions ...66 Summary of Growth Indicators ...66 1 Residential Development.. .• 68 Recent Residential Construction . 68 Persons Per Housing Unit 69 Population Estimates and Projections 70 Population and Housing Unit Projections 71 Nonresidential Development •• ....73 Employment Estimates and Projections .. 73 Nonresidential Square Footage Development 74 Nonresidential Floor Area and Employment Projections 75 Average Daily Vehicle Tripc .. 77 Trip Rate Adjustments 77 Estimated Vehicle Trips in Apache Junction .... 78 Demand Indicators by Size of Detached Housing 79 j ^ Summary . . .. . . . . 80 3 2 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Apache Junction has engaged TischlerBise to update its development fees for necessary public services pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 9-463 05. Municipalities in Arizona may assess development fees to offset infrastructure costs to a municipality associated with providing necessary public services to a development The development fees must be based on an Infrastructure Improvements Plan. Development fees cannot be used for, among other things projects not included in the Infrastructure Improvements Plan, projects related to existing development, or costs related to operations and maintenance This Infrastructure Improvements Plan and associated update to the City of Apache Junction development fees include the following necessary public services. • Library • Parks and Recreation • Police • Streets This plan also includes all necessary elements required to be in full compliance with SB 1525 ARIZONA DEVELOPMENT FEE ENABLING LEGISLATION Arizona Revised Statutes 9-463 05 (hereafter referred to as "development fee enabling legislation") governs how development fees are calculated for municipalities in Arizona During the state legislative session of 2011, Senate Bill 1525 (SB 1525) was introduced which significantly amended the development fee enabling legislation.The changes included • Amending existing development fee programs by January 1, 2012; • Abandoning existing development fee programs by August 1,2014, • A new development fee program structure developed from a unified Land Use Assumptions document and Infrastructure Improvements Plan, • New adoption procedures for the Land Use Assumptions, Infrastructure Improvements Plan, and development fees, • New definitions, including "necessary public services" which defines what categories and types of infrastructure may be funded with development fees, • Time limitations in development fee collections and expenditures; and • New requirements for credits, "grandfathering" rules, and refunds. Governor Brewer signed SB 1525 into law on April 26, 2011. This update of the City's development fees will be in compliance with all of the new requirements of SB 1525. 3 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona NECESSARY PUBLIC SERVICES The City of Apache Junction currently collects development fees for the following infrastructure categories • Library • Parks and Recreation • Police • Streets Under the new requirements of the development fee enabling legislation, development fees may be used only for construction, acquisition or expansion of public facilities that are necessary public services "Necessary public service" means any of the following categories of facilities that have a life expectancy of three or more years and that are owned and operated on behalf of the municipality: • Water Facilities • Wastewater Facilities • Storm Water, Drainage,and Flood Control Facilities • Library Facilities • Streets Facilities • Fire and Police Facilities • Neighborhood Parks and Recreational Facilities • Any facility that was financed before June 1, 2011 and that meets the following requirements: 1. Development fees were pledged to repay debt service obligations related to the construction of the facility. .+ 2. After August 1, 2014, any development fees collected are used solely for the payment of principal and interest on the portion of the bonds, notes, or other debt service obligations issued before June 1,2011 to finance construction of the facility INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Development fees must be calculated pursuant to an Infrastructure Improvements Plan (hereafter referred to as the "IIP"). For each necessary public service that is the subject of a development fee, by law,the infrastructure improvements plan shall include the following seven elements Element#1.A description of the existing necessary public services in the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, correct or replace those necessary public services to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable Element #2 An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing necessary public services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable Element#3•A description of all or the parts of the necessary public services or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, including a forecast of the costs of infrastructure, improvements, real property, financing, engineering and architectural services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable 4 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Element#4• A table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation or discharge of a service unit for each category of necessary public services or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial and industrial. Element #5: The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated pursuant to generally accepted engineering and planning criteria Element #6: The projected demand for necessary public services or facility expansions required by new service units for a period not to exceed ten years Element #7 A forecast of revenues generated by new service units other than development fees, which shall include estimated state-shared revenue, highway users revenue,federal revenue, ad valorem property taxes, construction contracting or similar excise taxes and the capital recovery portion of utility fees attributable to development based on the approved land use assumptions, and a plan to include these contributions in determining the extent of the burden imposed by the development QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS The IIP must be developed by qualified professionals using generally accepted engineering and planning practices. A qualified professional is defined as "a professional engineer, surveyor, financial analyst or planner providing services within the scope of the person's license,education, or experience." TischlerBise is a fiscal, economic, and planning consulting firm specializing in the cost of growth services. Our services include development fees, fiscal impact analysis, infrastructure financing analyses, user fee/cost of service studies, capital improvement plans, and fiscal software. TischlerBise has prepared over 800 impact fee studies over the past 30 years for local governments across the United States 5 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona DEVELOPMENT FEES CALCULATION METHODOLOGIES Development fees for the necessary public services generated by new development must be based on the same level of service provided to existing development in the service area There are three basic methodologies used to calculate development fees They examine the past, present, and future status of infrastructure. The objective of evaluating these different methodologies is to determine the best measure of the demand created by new development for additional infrastructure capacity. • Cost recovery (past) is used in instances when a community has oversized a facility or asset in anticipation of future development. This methodology is based on the rationale that new development is repaying the community for its share of the remaining unused capacity. • Incremental expansion method (present) documents the current level of service for each type of public facility The intent is to use revenue collected to expand or provide additional facilities, as needed to accommodate new development, based on the current cost to provide capital improvements. • Plan-based method (future) utilizes a community's capital improvement plan and/or other adopted plans or engineering studies to guide capital improvements needed to serve new development Figure 1 is a summary of methodologies,components and allocations used to calculate the IIP. Figure 1 Recommended Calculation Methodologies r Methodology Type of Public Facility Cost Recovery Incremental Expansion Plan Based (Past) (Present).. (Future) Libraries • Facilities Not Applicable Not Applicable • Developed Parkland • Park Improvements Parks and Recreation Not Applicable • Recreational Facilities Not Applicable • Multi-Use Trails • Vehicles Police Not Applicable • Communications Equipment Not Applicable • Collectors Streets • Minor Arterials • Not Applicable Signalized Intersections Reporting Results Calculations throughout this IIP are based on analysis conducted using Excel software Formulas and results are discussed herein using one-and two-digit place (in most cases), which represent rounded figures. However, the analysis itself uses figures carried to their ultimate decimal places, therefore the sums and products generated in the analysis may not equal the sum or product if the reader replicates the calculation with the factors shown in the memo (due to the rounding of figures shown, not in the analysis ) 6 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FEES Based on the data, assumptions, and calculation methodologies in the Land Use Assumptions document and Infrastructure Improvements Plan,the proposed development fees are listed in the figure below: Figure 2:Proposed City of Apache Junction Development Fees Parks& I I I Total Library Recreation Police Streets Development Fee Residential Per Housing Unit Single Unit $933 $1,686 $161 $2,221 $5,001 Single Unit-Manufactured Homes $653 $1,181 $113 $1,880 $3,827 2+Unit $750 $1,355 $129 $1,745 $3,979 Nonresidential Per Square Foot of Floor Area Commercial $015 $476 $4.91 Office $0 06 $2 06 $2 12 Industrial $004 $130 $133 Source TischlerBise 7 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona r COMPARISON TO CURRENT DEVELOPMENT FEES The City of Apache Junction currently collects development fees for the following infrastructure categories: • Library • Parks and Recreation • Police • Streets The City's current development fee summary is shown below. Figure 3 City of Apache Junction Current Development Fees II Parks& Current Library Recreation Police Streets Development Fee Residential Per Housing Unit Single Unit $721 $1,801 $294 $6,323 $9,139 Single Unit-Manufactured Homes $572 $1,429 $234 $3,297 $5,532 2+Unit $622 $1,555 $254 $4,440 $6,871 Nonresidential PerSquare Foot of Floor Area Commercial $180 $1364 $1543 Office $0 68 $5 68 $6 36 Industrial $027 $226 $253 Source:City of Apache Junction(2012). The changes between the proposed fees and the current fees are shown in the figure below. Note the red figures in parentheses represent decreases in fee amounts. Figure 4:Changes Between City of Apache Junction Current and Proposed Development Fees Net Change Parks& Library Recreation I Police Streets Development Fee Residential Per Housing Unit Single Unit $212 ($115) ($133) ($4,102) ($4,138) Single Unit-Manufactured Homes $81 ($248) ($121) ($1,417) ($1,705) 2+Unit $128 ($200) ($125) ($2,695) ($2,892) Nonresidential Per Square Foot of Floor Area Commercial ($1 64) ($8 88) ($10 53) Office ($0 62) ($3 62) ($4 24) Industrial ($0 23) ($0 96) ($1 20) /. 8 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona LIBRARY FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN OVERVIEW ARS 9-463 05 (T)(7)(f) defines the facilities and assets that can be included in the Library Facilities IIP as. "Library facilities of up to ten thousand square feet that provide a direct benefit to development, not including equipment, vehicles or appurtenances " The Library Facilities IIP includes components for facilities,and the cost of preparing the Library Facilities IIP and Development Fee Study Cost recovery is used to calculate the Library Facilities development fees SERVICE AREA The City of Apache Junction plans to provide a uniform level of service and equal service for Library facilities throughout the City As described in Apache Junction's 2010 General Plan Update, the City ensures,"that the library system continues its role as a major cultural resource for the community"As a result,the service area for the Library Facilities IIP is citywide Once development of Lost Dutchman Heights begins in earnest, it may become necessary to establish separate service areas for Library Facilities development fees However, for the purposes of this five- year study window the City of Apache Junction is considered a single service area. PROPORTIONATE SHARE ARS 9-463 05 (B)(3) states that the development lee shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of necessary public services needed to provide necessary public services to the development The Library Facilities development fees are assessed only on residential development as this type of development creates 100 percent of the burden for additional Library facilities Nonresidential development does not create additional burden for Library facilities, thus its proportionate share is 0 percent and is not assessed in the Library Facilities IIP. IIP FOR LIBRARY FACILITIES For each necessary public service that is the subject of a development fee, ARS 9-463 05(E) requires the IIP to include seven elements The sections below detail each of these elements. A forecast of new revenues generated by development fees can be found later in the report. 9 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY, USAGE,AND COSTS OF EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICES ARS 9-463 05 (E)(1) requires "A description of the existing necessary public services in the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, correct or replace those necessary public services to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable " ARS 9-463 05 (E)(2) requires. "An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing necessary public services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable." Level of Service The City completed an expansion of its Library facilities in 2008 The current inventory of Library facilities totals 31,444 The current inventory was built with excess capacity to serve future demand at the level of service established when the expansion began in 2006. At that time the original facility was 20,949 square feet and served a year-round population of 35,243 residents at an LOS of 0.59 square feet per capita The expanded facility is serving the 2013 base year population at an LOS of 0 84, demonstrating sufficient excess capacity to serve future growth Figure 5: Level of Service—Library Facilities Step 1-Level of Service Demand Year Level of Service Square Feet Demand Units Level of Service Unit 2006 Square Feet per Resident 20,949 - 35,243 = 0.59 per Person 2013 Square Feet per Resident 31,444 - 37,300 = 0.84 per Person 2026 Square Feet per Resident 31,444 - 45,544 = 069 per Person Debt was issued in 2007 to help fund the expansion of Library facilities As new development utilizes its proportionate share of the available capacity of the Library facilities, the City plans to have new development pay a proportionate share of the remaining debt scheduled to be retired in 2026. As shown above, if no new Library facilities are added and development occurs at the rate shown in the Land Use Assumptions, the LOS for Library facilities will change over the remaining life of the debt service. The level of service is projected to change from 0 84 square feet per capita, to 0 69 over the remaining life of the General Obligation bond used to fund the Library facilities expansion. Because the projected 2026 level of service will be higher than the original planned level of service of 0 59 an LOS discount must be calculated to ensure new development does not pay for a higher level of service than promised to existing development The calculation of a LOS discount is shown below. Figure 6. Level of Service Growth Share Step 2-Growth Share of Excess Capacity 2026 2006 2026 Level of Service Level of Service Level of Service Level of Service Discount 0 69 - 0 59 - 0 69 = 14% 10 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Cost per Demand Unit Debt was issued in 2007 to pay for the expansion of Library facilities to the current square footage of 31,444 Since the original bond issuance, $390,871 of previously collected development fee revenue has been allocated to the debt obligation As new development occurs the City plans to have new development pay for its share of the remaining obligation. The previously discussed level of service discount of 14 percent is applied to the remaining principal to calculate new growth's share of the remaining obligation. As shown in Figure 7, $5,109,129 in principal remains on the Library facility. Figure 7•City of Apache Junction 2007 Library Debt Service Step 3-Growth Share of Remaining Principal Debt Obligation Recouped by Level of Service Principal Previous Fees Discount Discount $5,500,000 - $390,871 X 14% _ $710,365 Step 3 5-Growth Share of Remainign Principal Remaining Level of Service Growth Share Principal Discount of Obligation $5,109,129 - $710,365 = $4,398,764 TischlerBise projects the City of Apache Junction will add 8,244 net new residents between of 2013 and 2026 when the original bond obligation is retired. The share of the remaining principal is divided by the net increase in population to calculate a cost per demand unit of$533 57 cost per capita Figure 8:Cost Recovery—Library Facilities Step 4-New Growth 2026 2013 Net increase in Demand Demand Units Demand Units Demand Units Unit 45,544 - 37,300 = 8,244 Person Step 5-Cost per Demand Unit Growth Share Demand Component Demand Fee Component of Obligation Units Cost Unit LibraryFacilities $4,398,764 - 8,244 = $533.57 per Person .tea 11 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Adak RATIO OF SERVICE UNIT TO DEVELOPMENT UNIT ARS 9-463 05 (E)(4) requires. "A table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation or discharge of a service unit for each category of necessary public services or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial and industrial." The following table displays the persons per housing unit factors used to establish a ratio of service unit to residential land uses Figure 9• Library Facilities Ratio of Service Unit to Development Unit Residential Development Persons per Land Use Housing Unit[1] Single Unit 173 2+Units 1 39 (1l Development Fee Land Use Assumptions PROJECTED SERVICE UNITS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEMAND 41,6 ARS 9-463 05(E)(3) requires. "A description of all or the parts of the necessary public services or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, including a forecast of the costs of infrastructure, improvements, real property, financing, engineering and architectural services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable." ARS 9-463.05(E)(5) requires "The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated pursuant to generally accepted engineering and planning criteria " ARS 9-463.05(E)(6) requires "The projected demand for necessary public services or facility expansions required by new service units for a period not to exceed ten years " 12 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona TischlerBise projects the City of Apache Junction will add an additional 8,244 persons over the 13-year course of the bond term. As existing and new development utilizes the available capacity of the Library facility at a level of service of 0 69 square feet per person, the available Library facilities will reach capacity in 2026 See Figure 10 for additional details Figure 10. Projected Demand for Library Facilities Library Facilities=31,4445F Residential Demand for Remaining Population Planned LOS Facility SF Capacity Base Yr 2013 37,300 0.69 25,752 5,692 1 2014 37,676 0.69 26,012 5,432 2 2015 38,094 0.69 26,300 5,144 3 2016 38,554 0.69 26,618 4,826 4 2017 39,059 0.69 26,967 4,477 5 2018 39,609 0.69 27,346 4,098 6 2019 40,206 0.69 27,759 3,685 7 2020 40,853 0.69 28,205 3,239 8 2021 41,552 0.69 28,688 2,756 9 2022 42,303 0.69 29,206 2,238 10 2023 43,111 0.69 29,764 1,680 11 2024 44,166 0.69 30,493 951 12 2025 44,850 0.69 30,965 479 13 2026 45,544 0.69 31,444 0 Source.TisrhlerBise Library Facilities Improvements Plan The City of Apache Junction does not plan to use Library development fees collected in the next five „Pk years to pay for any new expansion of Library facilities 13 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE LIBRARY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FEES The proposed development fees for Library facilities are shown in Figure 11. The proposed fee for an average single residential unit is calculated as follows $93 23 net capital cost per person X 1 73 persons per housing unit=$161 per average single residential housing unit This calculation is repeated for each residential unit type Figure 11•Proposed Library Facilities Development Fees1 Library Facilities Level of Service and Infrastructure Costs Per Person Library Debt Service $533 57 IlPand Development Fee Study Cost $6.08 NET CAPITAL COST $539.65 Required Offset Revenue Credit (Placeholder] NET CAPITAL COST $539 65 Library Facilities Development Fee Schedule Development Fee per Housing Unit Persons per Cost per Development Fee Increase Unit Type Housing Unit(.J Person Proposed`: Current 121 (Decrease) Single Unit 1.73 X $53965 = $933 $721 $212 SingleUnit-Manufactured 121 X $53965 = $653 $572 $81 2+Units 1.39 X $539.65 = $750 $622 $128 [1]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [2]Current Fee established in 2012 1 The development fees presented herein are for informational purposes only The final maximum supportable development fees will be adjusted in accordance with the findings of the Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvements Plan review and adoption process Further adjustment will be made to reflect any necessary offset revenue credits as required by ARS 9- 463.05(E)(7). 14 schlerBise Ti DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona CASH FLOW ANALYSIS The cash flow summary shown in Figure 12 provides an indication of the development fee revenue and capital costs necessary to meet the demand for Library facilities For the debt service associated with expanding the Library facilities in 2008 the total payments of principal and interest to be paid in 2014 through 2023 are included in the capital costs Development fees will pay for the share of the debt service that is attributable to the excess capacity of the facilities. The cash flow deficit shown below represents the portion of the debt service that will not be paid with development fee revenue Figure 12. Library Facilities Cash Flow Summary2 10-Year 1 2 3 4 5 10 Average Cumulative (Current$in thousands) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Annual Total REVENUES LIBRARIES 1 Libraries Fee-Single Unit Res $189 $211 $231 $254 $277 $407 $292 $2,924 2 Libraries Fee-2+Unit Res $14 $14 $14 $14 $14 $14 $14 $137 Subtotal Libraries Fees $203 $224 $245 $268 $290 $420 $306 $3,060 CAPITAL COSTS LIBRARIES Debt Service $307___ $305 $303 $305 $307 $302 $305 $3,055 IlPand Development Fee Study $2 $3 $3 $3 $3 $0 $1 $14 Subtotal Libraries Costs $310 $308 $305 $308 $311 $302 $307 $3,069 CASH FLOW NET CAPITAL FACILITIES CASH FLOW- LIBRARIES Current$in thousands Annual Surplus(or Deficit) ($107) ($83) ($61) ($40) (521) $118 ($1) Cumulative Surplus(or Deficit) ($107) ($190) ($251) ($291) ($312) ($9) ($9) Source-TischlerBise,Land Use Assumptions 2 The cash flow is shown in rounded figures However,the analysis itself uses figures carried to their ultimate decimal places; therefore the sums and products generated in the analysis may not equal the sum or product if the reader replicates the calculation with the factors shown in the memo(due to the rounding of figures shown,not in the analysis) 15 lischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] a 16 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN OVERVIEW ARS 9-463 05 (T)(7)(f) defines the facilities and assets that can be included in the Parks and Recreational Facilities IIP as "Neighborhood parks and recreational facilities on real property up to thirty acres in area, or parks and recreational facilities larger than thirty acres if the facilities provide a direct benefit to the development Parks and recreational facilities do not include vehicles, equipment or that portion of any facility that is used for amusement parks, aquariums, aquatic centers, auditoriums, arenas, arts and cultural facilities, bandstand and orchestra facilities, bathhouses, boathouses, clubhouses, community centers greater than three thousand square feet in floor area, environmental education centers, equestrian facilities, golf course facilities, greenhouses, lakes, museums, theme parks, water reclamation or riparian areas, wetlands, zoo facilities or similar recreational facilities, but may include swimming pools " The Parks and Recreational Facilities IIP includes components for developed parkland, improvements to parks, multi-use trails, recreational facilities, and the cost of preparing the Parks and Recreational Facilities IIP and Development Fee Study The incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate the parkland, park improvements, multi-use trails, and recreational facilities components of the Parks and Recreational Facilities IIP. SERVICE AREA The City of Apache Junction plans to provide a uniform level of service for Parks and Recreational facilities throughout the City As described in Apache Junction's 2010 General Plan Update,the City is, "a place that emphasizes outdoor enjoyment, provides a variety of recreational activities, and connects different population groups and residential neighborhoods" As a result, the service area for the Parks and Recreational Facilities IIP is citywide. Once development of Lost Dutchman Heights begins in earnest, it may become necessary to establish separate service areas for Parks and Recreational Facilities development fees. However, for the purposes of this five-year study window the City of Apache Junction is considered a single service area PROPORTIONATE SHARE ARS 9-463 05 (B)(3) states that the development fee shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of necessary public services needed to provide necessary public services to the development. The Parks and Recreational IIP and development fees are assessed only on residential development as this type of development creates 100 percent of the burden for additional Parks and Recreational facilities. Nonresidential development does not create additional burden for Parks and Recreational facilities,thus its proportionate share is 0 percent and is not assessed in the Parks and Recreational Facilities IIP IIP FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES +%. For each necessary public service that is the subject of a development fee, ARS 9-463 05(E) requires the IIP to include seven elements. The sections below detail each of these elements. A forecast of new revenues generated by development fees can be found later in the report. 17 Tischler$ise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY,USAGE,AND COSTS OF EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICES ARS 9-463 05(E)(1) requires "A description of the existing necessary public services in the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, correct or replace those necessary public services to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable " ARS 9-463 05 (E)(2) requires: "An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing necessary public services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable " The existing public services included in the Parks and Recreational Facilities HP includes developed parkland, park improvements, multi-use trails, and recreational facilities. 18 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Parkland The City currently has 98 acres of developed parkland serving a current population of 37,300 persons The City currently leases from the Bureau of Land Management 2,049 acres of undeveloped open space within its municipal boundary. The leases are used to preserve open space for eventual purchase by the City To calculate the development fees for parkland, only land already developed is used so as not to inflate the level of service provided by the City to its residents The City plans to maintain the level of service for developed parkland that it provides to existing development Thus, the incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate this component of the Parks and Recreational Facilities HP. The calculation to determine level of service is as follows. 98 developed acres / (37,300/1,000 population) = 2 63 acres per 1,000 residents According to the Parks and Recreation Department of the City, it costs approximately $260,000 in infrastructure costs to develop an acre of parkland. To calculate the cost of developed parkland per demand unit the cost per unit of$260,000 is multiplied by the per person level of service resulting in a developed acres cost per capita of$683 11 Figure 13: Incremental Expansion—Developed Parkland Step 1-Cost per Component Other Parkland Total Developed Cost per Undeveloped Parkland Value [1] Acres Acre [1] Acres [2] Prospector Park $10,400,000 40 $260,000 225 Superstition Shadows Park $5,980,000 23 $260,000 - Veteran's Memorial Park $520,000 2 $260,000 - Little League Facility $780,000 3 $260,000 - Renaissance Point Retention Area $2,080,000 8 $260,000 - Arroyo Verde Retention Area $2,860,000 11 $260,000 - Focal Point $260,000 1 $260,000 - City Hall Park $780,000 3 $260,000 - City/County Retention Area $780,000 3 $260,000 - SillyMountain Park $1,040,000 4 $260,000 196 Sheep Drive Trail - - - 1,628 TOTALS $25,480,000 - 98 = $260,000 2,049 Step 2-Level of Service 2013 Demand Level of Service Acres Demand Units Level of Service Unit Developed Parkland per Resident 98 - 37,300 = 0.0026 per Person Step 3-Cost per Demand Unit Cost per Component Demand Fee Component Acre Level of Service Cost Unit Developed Parkland $260,000 X 00026 = $683.11 per Person Source City of Apache Junction,Parks and Recreation Dept [1]The total value for the City of Apache Junction developed parkland is calculated based on the Cost per Acre of$260,000 provided by the City of Apache Junction,Parks and Recreation Dept [2] Undeveloped acres are U S Bureau of Land Management lands within the City 19 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Park Improvements The City of Apache Junction provides active and passive park improvements for use by the current population. Park improvements provided by the City include amenities for passive (ramadas) and active recreation (sports fields), playgrounds, equestrian fields, and restrooms As the resident population grows, the City will add park improvements as necessary to maintain the current level of service of 2.7 units per 1,000 residents(rounded) The incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate the cost per demand unit for park improvements in City of Apache Junction. The three-step process, shown below includes calculating an average cost per park improvements, calculating the current level of service provided to existing development, and finally multiplying the average cost of park improvements by the level of service that will be maintained as the City's population growth The resulting cost per capita for park improvements is$234 85 Figure 14: Incremental Expansion-Park Improvements Step 1-Cost per Component Total Cost per Park Improvements Value Units Unit Ramadas (single) $37,500 3 $12,500 Ramadas(small group) $350,000 14 $25,000 Ramadas (large group) $245,000 7 $35,000 Shuffleboard Courts $60,000 3 $20,000 Horseshoe Pits $12,500 5 $2,500 .0411116k Playgrounds $600,000 4 $150,000 Ball Fields $1,120,000 7 $160,000 Concession/Restrooms $1,200,000 6 $200,000 Tennis Courts $675,000 9 $75,000 Racquetball Courts $360,000 4 $90,000 Basketball Courts $210,000 3 $70,000 Volleyball Courts $32,000 4 $8,000 Soccer/Football Fields $480,000 3 $160,000 Skate Park $500,000 1 $500,000 Security Fencing $660,000 25 $26,400 Pool $2,218,000 1 $2,218,000 TOTALS $8,760,000 - 99 = $88,485 Step 2-Level of Service 2013 Demand Level of Service Acres Demand Units Level of Service Unit Park Improvements per Resident 99 -• 37,300 = 0.0027 per Person Step 3-Cost per Demand Unit Cost per Component Demand Fee Component Unit Level of Service Cost Unit Park Improvements $88,485 X 0.0027 = $234.85 per Person Source City of Apoche Junction,Parks and Recreation Dept. 20 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Recreational Facilities The City plans to maintain the level of service (LOS) for recreational facilities that it provides to existing development Thus, the incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate this component The City currently maintains 42,834 square feet of recreational facilities to serve a current population of 37,300. For recreational facilities that are greater than 3,000 square feet in size, the development fee enabling legislation dictates that only 3,000 square feet of each facility can be used to calculate a level of service (for new development) and cost per demand unit for the Parks and Recreational Facilities IIP and development fees. The current LOS for residential development is calculated as follows 8,375 eligible square feet/37,300 current population =0.2245 square feet per capita The cost per demand unit is the product of square feet per demand unit (0.2245) and the average cost per square foot equals$206(rounded), resulting in a Recreational Facilities cost per capita of$46 32 Figure 15: Incremental Expansion—Recreational Facilities Step 1-Cost per Component Total Square Cost per Facility Value Feet Square Foot Park Ranger Office&City Conference Center $229,613 2,375 $97 Multi-Generational Building $8,385,861 36,850 $228 Superstition Shadows Aquatics Center $221,848 FT-3,609 $61 TOTALS $8,837,322 - 42,834 = $206 Eligible Square Footage[1] 8,375 Step 2-Level of Service Eligible 2013 Demand Level of Service Square Feet Demand Units Level of Service Unit Square Feet per Resident 8,375 - 37,300 = 0.2245 per Person Step 3-Cost per Demand Unit Cost per Component Demand Fee Component Square Foot Level of Service Cost Unit Recreational Facilities $206 X 02245 = $46.32 per Person Source City of Apache Junction,Parks and Recreation Dept [1]ARS 9 46305(T)(7)(f),"Parks and recreational facilities do not include community centers greater than three thousand square feet in floor area " 21 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Multi-Use Trails The City of Apache Junction measures its inventory of multi-use trails in acres to adjust for trails of varying widths. As of 2013, the City maintains 17 acres of multi-use trails. The inventory is sufficient to meet current demand, therefore an increment expansion methodology is used to calculate level of service by dividing the current inventory (17 acres) by current population (37,300) This equates to a level of service of 0 5 acres of multi-use trails per 1,000 residents (rounded) It costs the City approximately $5,000 to develop a multi-use trail acre To calculate the cost of multi-use trails per demand unit the cost to develop an acre of trails ($5,000) is multiplied by the level of service per person resulting in a per capita cost of$2 28 Figure 16: Incremental Expansion—Multi-Use Trails Step 1-Cost per Component Total Cost per Multi-Use Trails Value[1] Acres [2] Acre Silly Mountain Park $10,000 2 $5,000 Sheep Drive Trail System $65,000 13 $5,000 Arroyo Verde Open Space Area $5,000 1 $5,000 Renaissance Point Open Space $5,000 1 $5,000 TOTALS $85,000- - 17 = $5,000 Step 2-Level of Service 2013 Demand Level of Service Acres Demand Units Level of Service Unit ..� Multi-Use Trails per Resident 17 - 37,300 = 0.0005 per Person Step 3-Cost per Demand Unit Cost per Component Demand Fee Component Acre Level of Service Cost Unit Multi-Use Trails $5,000 X 0.0005 = $2.28 per Person Source:City of Apache Junction,Parks and Recreation Dept [1]The total value for the City of Apache Junction multi-use trails is calculated based on the Cost per Acre of$5,000 provided by the City of Apache Junction,Parks and Recreation Dept [2]The City of Apache Junction measures its inventory of multi-use trails in acres to adjust for trails of varying widths 22 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona RATIO OF SERVICE UNIT TO DEVELOPMENT UNIT ARS 9-463.05(E)(4) requires• "A table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation or discharge of a service unit for each category of necessary public services or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial and industrial." The following table displays the persons per housing unit factors used to establish a ratio of service unit to residential land uses. Figure 17: Parks and Recreational Facilities Ratio of Service Unit to Development Unit Residential Development Persons per Land Use Housing Unit[1] Single Unit 173 2+Units 1 39 [1] Development Fee Land Use Assumptions PROJECTED DEMAND FOR SERVICES AND COSTS ARS 9-463 05(E)(3) requires "A description of all or the parts of the necessary public services or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, including a forecast of the costs of infrastructure, improvements, real property, financing, engineering and architectural services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable " ARS 9-463 05(E)(5) requires: "The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated pursuant to generally accepted engineering and planning criteria." ARS 9-463.05(E)(6) requires- "The projected demand for necessary public services or facility expansions required by new service units for a period not to exceed ten years " 23 lischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Growth projections for the City of Apache Junction suggest the City will add 5,811 new residents in the next ten years In order to maintain current levels of service for developed parkland, park improvements, recreational facilities, and multi-use trails the City will need to make incremental investments Shown in Figure 18 below are the acres and units needed to maintain current levels of service,and the total investment necessary for each Parks and Recreational Facilities component Figure 18: Projected Demand for Parks and Recreational Facilities Base Yr 1 2 3 4 5 10 5-Yr Net 10-Yr Net Year=> 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Increase Increase DEMAND PROJECTIONS(cumulative) Population 37,300 37,676 38,094 38,554 39,059 39,609 43,111 2,309 5,811 'Source Development Fee Land Use Assumptions CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS DUE TO GROWTH p RKc 3A RECREATION Parkland Acres Needed to Serve Growth CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE[1( • 1 2 ;. 3 4 5 10 5-Year 10-Year Developed Parkland(Acres Needed) LOS 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Total Total IAcres per Person) 0.0026 Annual Acres I 11 11 11 11 11 2 Cumulative Acres 1 2 3 5 6 15 6 15 Cost Land Costs Developed Cost per Acre $260,000 5256,8491 $285,540 $314,231 $344,971 $375,710 $551,953 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS $256,849 $542,389 $856,620 $1,201,590 $1,577 301 $3,969,552 $1,577,301 $3,969,552 Park Im• •cements Needed to Serve Growth CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE(2) 1 2 3 • 4 5 10 5-Year 10-Year Improvements(Units Needed) LOS 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Total Total I Units per Person) 0.0027 I Annual Units I 11 11 11 11 11 2 Cumulative Units 1 2 3 5 6 15 6 15 am Cost Park Improvements Cost per Unit $88,485 $88,305 $98,168 $108,0321 $118,601 $129,169 $189,761 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS $88,305 $186,473 $294,505 5413,106 5542,275 $1,364,728 $542,275 $1,364,728 Recreation Facilities CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE 131 1 2 3 4 5 10 5-Year 10-Year Recreation Facilities(Sq.Ft.Needed) LOS 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Total Total' Square Feet per Person! 0.22 Annual Square Feet I 841 941 103! 1131 1231 181 Cumulative Square Feet 84 178 282 395 518 1,305 518 1,305 Cost Recreation Facilities Cost per Square Foot $206 $17,4181 $19,364 $21,309 $23,394 $25,478 $37,430 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS $17418 $36,781 $58,091 $81,484 $106,963 $269,190 $ 106,963 $ 269,190 Multi-Use Trail Facilities.Needed to Serve Growth CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE(41 1 2 3 4 5 10 5-Year 10-Year Multi Use Trails(Acres Needed) LOS 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Total Total IAcres per Person] 0.0005 I Annual Acres I 0.2[ 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.31 0.4 Cumulative Acres 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 2.6 ' 1.1 ' 2.6 Cost Multi Use Trails Cost per Acre $5,000 $857 $9531 $1,048 $1,151 $1,2531 $1,841 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS $857 $1,809 $2,858 $4,008 $5,262 $13,242 $5,262 $13,242 PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES TOTAL GRAND TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS $363,429 $404,024 $444,620 $488,116 $531,611 $780,985 GRAND TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS $363,429 $767,453 $1,212,073 $1,700,189 $2,231,800 $5,616,712 $2,231,800 ,$ 5,616,712 [1]•See Figure 13 Incremental Expansion-Developed Parkland [2]•See Figure 14 Incremental Expansion-Park Improvements [3].See Figure 15 Incremental Expansion-Recreational Facilities [4].See Figure 16 Incremental Expansion-Multi-Use Trails 24 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Parks and Recreational Facilities Improvements Plan Lastly, identified below is an incremental plan for necessary Parks and Recreational Facilities improvements and expansions identified by City of Apache Junction as qualified for development fee revenue As demand is generated for identified Parks and Recreational Facilities improvements, investments from this list will be made. Figure 19:Necessary Parks and Recreational Facilities Expansions Park and Facilities Improvements Planned Investments Prospector Park $3,935,000 Parkland Demolition and Site Preparation $1,000,000 Landscape $33,000 Pavement,Curbs $300,000 Pavement,Curbs,Gutters,Walks $792,000 Improvements Restroom Building $200,000 Site Amenities -Improvements $1,610,000 Sheep Drive Trail $883,750 Parkland Pavement,Curbs $450,000 Improvements Site Amenities-Improvements $400,000 Multi-Use Trails Mulit-Use Trails $33,750 �. Silly Mountain Park $5,755,594 Parkland Irrigation $228,800 Demolition and Site Preparation $724,277 Electrical $175,000 Electrical Systems $597,500 Landscape $206,707 Pavement,Curbs $712,075 Pavement,Curbs,Gutters,Walks $554,535 Utilities $567,600 Improvements Restroom Building $600,000 Site Amenities -Improvements $1,389,100 Superstition Shadows $441,000 Parkland Pavement,Curbs $55,000 Improvements Site Amenities-Improvements $386,000 Rec Swim Center $2,468,000 Improvements Site Amenities -Improvements $2,218,000 Recreational Facility Facility $250,000 Grand Total $13,483,344 Source.City of Apache Junction,Parks and Recreation Department 25 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FEES The proposed development fees for Parks and Recreational Facilities are shown in Figure 20. The development fee is calculated by multiplying the net capital cost per person by the persons per housing unit factors for each unit type. Figure 20.Proposed Parks and Recreational Facilities Development Fees3 Parks and Recreational Facilities Level Of Service and Infrastructure Costs Per Person Parkland Cost[3] Developed Parks $68311 Park Improvements Cost[4] Developed Parks $234.85 Recreation Facility Cost[5] $46.32 Multi-Use Trails Cost[6] $2.28 IIP and Development Fee Study Cost $8.37 NET CAPITAL COST $974.93 Required Offset Revenue Credit [Placeholder] NET CAPITAL COST $974.93 Parks and Recreational Facilities Development Fee Schedule Development Fee per Housing Unit Persons per Cost per Development Fee Increase Unit Type Housing Unit fi] Person Proposed Current[2] (Decrease) Single Unit 1.73 X - $97493 = $1,686 $1,801 ($115) Single Unit-Manufactured 1.21 X $974.93 = $1,181 $1,429 ($248) 2+Unit 139 X $97493 = $1,355 $1,555 ($200) [1] Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [2] Current fee established in 2012 [3] See Figure 13 Incremental Expansion—Developed Parkland Auk [4] See Figure 14 Incremental Expansion—Park Improvements [5] See Figure 15 Incremental Expansion—Recreational Facilities [6] See Figure 16 Incremental Expansion—Multi-Use Trails 3 The development fees presented herein are for informational purposes only The final maximum supportable development fees will be adjusted in accordance with the findings of the Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvements Plan review and adoption process. Further adjustment will be made to reflect any necessary offset revenue credits as required by ARS 9- 463 05(E)(7) 26 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona .r CASH FLOW ANALYSIS The cash flow summary shown in Figure 21 provides an indication of the development fee revenue and expenditures necessary to meet the demand for Parks and Recreational Facilities To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows, there will be a corresponding change in the development fee revenue and capital costs Necessary expenditures associated with the incremental expansion of developed parkland, park improvements, recreational facilities, and multi-use trails are calculated based on current costs per acre/unit/square foot, and on maintaining the current level of service. Development fees collected will pay for only the portion of investments attributable to expected growth The cash flow demonstrates if growth occurs as projected, there should be sufficient development fee revenue to invest in the necessary Parks and Recreational Facilities expansions to accommodate growth Figure 21:Parks and Recreational Facilities Cash Flow Summary4 5-Year 1 2 3 4 5 Average Cumulative (Current$in thousands) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Annual Total REVENUES PARKS 1 Parks Fee-Single Unit Res $342 $381 $418 $459 $500 $420 $2,099 - 2 Parks Fee-2+Unit Res $25 $27 $30 $33 $36 $30 $152 Subtotal Parks Fees $367 $408 $448 $492 $536 $450 $2,251 CAPITAL COSTS Aug.. PARKS Parkland $257 $286 $314 $345 $376 $315 $1,577 Park Improvements $88 $98 $108 $119 $129 $108 $542 Recreation Facilities $17 $19 $21 $23 $25 $21 $107 Multi-Use Trails $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $5 IIP and Development Fee Study $3 $3 $4 $4 $5 $4 $19 Subtotal Parks Costs $367 $408 $448 $492 $536 $450 $2,251 CASH FLOW NET CAPITAL FACILITIES CASH FLOW- PARKS Current$in thousands Annual Surplus(or Deficit) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cumulative Surplus (or Deficit) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Source:TischlerBise, Land Use Assumptions /110114, 4 The cash flow is shown in rounded figures However,the analysis itself uses figures carried to their ultimate decimal places, therefore the sums and products generated in the analysis may not equal the sum or product if the reader replicates the calculation with the factors shown in the memo(due to the rounding of figures shown,not in the analysis) TischlerBise 27 DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona it [PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] lischlerBise 28 DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona POLICE FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN OVERVIEW ARS 9-463 05(T)(7)(f)defines the facilities and assets that can be included in the Police Facilities IIP as "Fire and police facilities, including all appurtenances, equipment and vehicles Fire and police facilities do not include a facility or portion of a facility that is used to replace services that were once provided elsewhere in the municipality, vehicles and equipment used to provide administrative services, helicopters or airplanes or a facility that is used for training police and firefighters from more than one station or substation " The Police Facilities IIP includes components for vehicles, communications equipment, and the cost of preparing the Police Facilities IIP and Development Fee Study. Incremental expansion is used to calculate the vehicles,and communications equipment elements of the Police Facilities IIP SERVICE AREA The City of Apache Junction plans to provide a uniform level of service and equal service for Police facilities throughout the City As described in Apache Junction's 2010 General Plan Update, "the Apache Junction Police Department (AJPD) is a full service public safety agency, primarily carrying out police services within the jurisdiction of the City of Apache Junction "As a result,the service area for the Police IIP is citywide Once development of Lost Dutchman Heights begins in earnest, it may become necessary to establish separate service areas for Police Facilities development fees However,for the purposes of this five-year study window the City of Apache Junction is considered a single service area PROPORTIONATE SHARE Functional Population ARS 9-463 05 (B)(3) states that the development fee shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of necessary public services needed to provide necessary public services to the development.The Police IIP and development fees use a functional population concept to calculate a proportionate share in order to allocate the demand between residential and nonresidential development Functional population is calculated based on characteristics of the residential population and workers in the City of Apache Junction Place of residence and place of work data were analyzed to determine demand by type of land use using "person-hours" See Figure 22 below for the calculations For residential development, the proportionate share factor is based on estimated person hours of non- working residents plus the non-working hours of resident workers The portion of the population not working is estimated at 23,809 in 2010 (This is calculated by subtracting the Longitudinal Employer- Household Dynamics (LEHD) web-based application OnTheMap estimate of employed residents of the City (12,031) from the 2010 decennial census population in 2010 (35,840)) For these residents, the full day (or 24 hours) is allocated to residential demand. According to the 2010 Census, workers who live in Apache Junction total 12,031 (Of the 12,031 employed residents, the U S Census estimates that 1,236 work in Apache Junction and 10,795 work outside the City) For workers living in the City, two-thirds of the day (or 16 hours) is allocated to residential demand. Time spent at work (8 hours) is allocated to nonresidential development TischlerBise 29 DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona For nonresidential development, 8 hours per person is estimated for each worker For the 1,236 estimated City residents working in Apache Junction and the 7,325 non-resident workers (estimated based on the number of jobs in the City minus resident workers), 8 hours of demand per day is allocated Based on estimated person hours, the cost allocation is 92 percent for residential development (763,912 person hours of residential demand out of a total 832,400 person hours) and 8 percent for nonresidential development (68,488 person hours of nonresidential demand out of a total 832,400 person hours). Shown in Figure 22 is the functional population calculation to assign demand hours per day by type of resident and worker in City of Apache Junction Figure 22:Police Functional Population Proportionate Share Demand Person Proportionate Land Use Demand Units in 2010 Hours/Day Hours Share Residential Estimated Residents 35,840 Residents Not Working 23,809 24 571,416 Workers Living in City 12,031 City Residents Working in Apache Junction 1,236 16 19,776 City Residents Working outside of City 10,795 16 172,720 Residential Subtotal 763,912 92% Nonresidential Jobs Located in City 8,561 City Residents Working in City 1,236 8 9,888 Non-Resident Workers 7,325 8 58,600 Nonresidential Subtotal 68,488 8% TOTAL 832,400 100% Source U S Census Bureau,2010 Decennial Census,U S Census Bureau,OnTheMap 611 Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics Ark 30 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Demand Units The Police Facilities costs are allocated to both residential and nonresidential development based on an analysis of incident by land use type data (calls for service) For residential development, Police Facilities development fees are calculated on a per capita basis, and then converted to an appropriate amount by type of housing units, based on persons per housing unit factors For nonresidential development fees, TischlerBise recommends using nonresidential vehicle trips as the best demand indicator for Police Facilities Trip generation rates are used for nonresidential development because vehicle trips are highest for commercial developments, such as shopping centers, and lowest for industrial/flex development Office and institutional trip rates fall between the other two categories This ranking of trip rates is consistent with the relative demand for Police services from nonresidential development. Other possible nonresidential demand indicators, such as employment or floor area, will not accurately reflect the demand for service. For example, if employees per thousand square feet were used as the demand indicator, police impact fees would be too high for office and institutional development because offices typically have more employees per 1,000 square feet than retail uses. If floor area were used as the demand indicator Police development fees would be too high for industrial development. More information regarding the calculation of nonresidential vehicle trips can be found in Figure 26 Police Facilities Ratio of Service Units to Land Use. Police Calls for Service The proportionate share factors described above were applied to the 40,067 calls for service answered by the AJPD in calendar year 2012 to derive CFS per capita and CFS per nonresidential vehicle trip See Figure 23 for more detail Figure 23. Police Calls for Service by Land Use Step 1-Calls for Service by Land Use Proportionate Calls for Calls per Land Use Share Service [1] Land Use Residential 92% X 40,067 36,862 Nonresidential 8% X = 3,205 Step 2-Level of Service Calls per 2013 Demand Level of Service Land Use Demand Units Level of Service Unit Calls per Resident 36,862 - 37,300 = 09882 per Person Calls per Nonresidential Vehicle Trip[2] 3,205 - 27,000 = 01187 per Vehicle Trip [1]City of Apache Junction Police Department;Calls for service for calendar year 2012 [2]Nonresidential Vehicle Trips shown in rounded numbers 31 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona IIP FOR POLICE FACILITIES For each necessary public service that is the subject of a development fee, ARS 9-463 05(E) requires the IIP to include seven elements. The sections below detail each of these elements A forecast of new revenues generated by development fees can be found later in the report ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY, USAGE,AND COSTS OF EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICES ARS 9-463 05 (E)(1) requires "A description of the existing necessary public services in the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, correct or replace those necessary public services to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable " ARS 9-463 05 (E)(2) requires- "An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing necessary public services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable." The existing public services included in the Police Facilities IIP are Police vehicles, and Police communications equipment 32 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Vehicles The City plans to maintain the current LOS for Police vehicles; thus the incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate this component of the Police IIP. The City currently has 50 vehicles serving 37,300 persons and 27,000 nonresidential vehicle trips (rounded). Based on the current inventory, the proportionate share factors, and existing development, the steps to calculate the cost of Police vehicles per residential and nonresidential demand units are shown in Figure 24. Figure 24: Incremental Expansion—Vehicles Step 1-Cost per Component Total Cost per Vehicles Value[1] Units Unit Marked Patrol Vehicles $1,040,349 22 $47,289 Unmarked Patrol Vehicles $531,532 18 $29,530 Detention Vans $92,262 2 $46,131 Vans(Victims Svc&Comm) $70,632 2 $35,316 Motorcycles $128,734 4 $32,184 Mobile Command Van $319,882 1 $319,882 SWAT Van $373,196 1 $373,196 TOTALS $2,556,587 _ 50 = $51,132 Step 2-Level of Service Proportionate 2013 Demand Level of Service Units Share Demand Units Level of Service Unit Vehicles per Resident 50 X 92% - 37,300 = 0.0012 per Person Vehicles per Nonresidential Vehicle Trip[2] 50 X 8% - 27,000 = 0.0001 per Vehicle Trip Step 3-Cost per Demand Unit Cost per Component Demand Fee Component Unit Level of Service Cost Unit Police Vehicles-Residential $51,132 X 0.0012 = $63.06 per Person Police Vehicles-Nonresidential $51,132 X 0.0001 = $7.58 per Vehicle Trip Source City of Apache Junction [1]Total Value in 2007,provided by The City of Apache Junction Police adjusted for inflation using 2007 and Feb 2013 Bureau of Labor Statistics,CPI Index [2]Nonresidential Vehicle Trips shown in rounded numbers 33 lischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Communications Equipment The City plans to maintain the current LOS for Police communications equipment, thus the incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate this component of the Police IIP The City currently has 170 units of Police communications equipment serving 37,300 persons and 27,000 nonresidential vehicle trips (rounded) Based on the current inventory, the proportionate share factors, and existing development, the steps to calculate the cost of Police communications equipment per residential and nonresidential demand units are shown in Figure 25. Figure 25: Incremental Expansion-Communications Equipment Step 1-Cost per Component Total Cost per Equipment Value Units Unit Portable Radios $572,000 104 $5,500 Mobile Radios $335,296 62 $5,408 Dispatch Consoles $60,000 4 $15,000 TOTALS $967,296 _ 170 = $5,690 Ste.2-Level of Service Proportionate 2013 Demand Level of Service Units Share Demand Units Level of Service Unit Comm Equipment per Resident 170 X 92% 37,300 = 0.0042 per Person Comm Equip per Nonres Vehicle Trip[1] 170 X 8% —• 27,000 = 0.0005 per Vehicle Trip Step 3-Cost per Demand Unit Cost per Component Demand 4124k. Fee Component Unit Level of Service Cost Unit Police Comm Equip.-Residential $5,690 X 0.0042 = $23.86 per Person Police Comm.Equip -Nonresidential $5,690 X 0.0005 = $2.87 per Vehicle Trip Source City of Apache Junction [1]Nonresidential Vehicle Trips shown in rounded numbers 34 Tischler ise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona RATIO OF SERVICE UNIT TO DEVELOPMENT UNIT ARS 9-463 05 (E)(4) requires "A table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation or discharge of a service unit for each category of necessary public services or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial and industrial" Figure 26 displays the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses for residential and nonresidential development The residential development table displays the persons per housing unit for single unit structures and multi-unit structures For nonresidential development fees, TischlerBise recommends using nonresidential vehicle trips as the best demand indicator for Police Facilities. Trip generation rates are used for nonresidential development because vehicle trips are highest for commercial developments, such as shopping centers, and lowest for industrial/flex development. Office and institutional trip rates fall between the other two categories This ranking of trip rates is consistent with the relative demand for Police services from nonresidential development Other possible nonresidential demand indicators, such as employment or floor area, will not accurately reflect the demand for service. For example, if employees per thousand square feet were used as the demand indicator, police impact fees would be too high for office and institutional development because offices typically have more employees per 1,000 square feet than retail uses. If floor area were used as the demand indicator Police development fees would be too high for industrial development Vehicle trips are estimated using average weekday vehicle trip ends from the reference book Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE 9th Edition, 2012) A Vehicle Trip End represents a vehicle either entering or exiting a development (as if a traffic counter were placed across a driveway). To calculate development fees, trip generation rates require an adjustment factor to avoid double counting each trip at both the origin and destination points Therefore, the basic trip adjustment factor is 50 percent. For commercial development, the trip adjustment factor is less than 50 percent because retail development and some services attract vehicles as they pass by on arterial and collector roads For example, when someone stops at a convenience store on the way home from work, the convenience store is not the primary destination. For the average shopping center, the ITE data indicate that 34 percent of the vehicles that enter are passing by on their way to some other primary destination. Because attraction trips are half of all trips, the trip adjustment factor is 66 percent multiplied by 50 percent, for a commercial trip adjustment factor of 33 percent These factors are shown to derive inbound vehicle trips for each type of nonresidential land use 35 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure 26: Police Facilities Ratio of Service Units to Land Use Residential Development Persons per Land Use Housing Unit[1] Single Unit 173 2+Units 1 39 [1] Development Fee Land Use Assumptions Nonresidential Development Weekday Trip Trip Land Use Ends [2] Adjustment[3] Vehicle Trips (a) (b) (a X b) Commercial 42 70 33% 14 09 Office/Institutional 1103 50% 5 52 Industrial/Flex 697 50% 349 [1] Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [2] Institute of Transportation Engineers (2012) Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition [3] On an average weekday,half of all trip ends are inbound Commercial (including Retail)include a 34%pass-by adjustment to reflect 66%of trips are Mika. PROJECTED DEMAND FOR SERVICES AND COSTS ARS 9-463 05(E)(3) requires "A description of all or the parts of the necessary public services or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, including a forecast of the costs of infrastructure, improvements, real property, financing, engineering and architectural services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable " ARS 9-463.05(E)(5) requires "The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated pursuant to generally accepted engineering and planning criteria " ARS 9-463.05(E)(6) requires. "The projected demand for necessary public services or facility expansions required by new service units for a period not to exceed ten years " 36 lischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona r Growth projections, discussed in the Development Fee Land Use Assumptions, for the City of Apache Junction suggest the City will add 5,811 residents in the next ten years Growth is projected to generate an additional 9,066 nonresidential vehicle trips In order to maintain current levels of service for the Police vehicles the AJPD will need to add 9 vehicles and 29 units of communications equipment. These demands have an estimated cost of$601,177. See Figure 27 below for additional details Figure 27: Projected Demand for Police Facilities Base Yr 1 2 3 4 $ 10 5-Yr Net 10-Yr Net Year=> 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Increase Increase DEMAND PROJECTIONS(cumulative). Population 37,300 37,676 38,094 38,554 39,059 39,609 43,111 2,309 5,811 Nonresidential Vehicle Trips 27,000 27 789 28,610 29,450 30,316 31,200 36,066 4,200 9,066 'Source Development Fee Land Use Assumptions CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS DUE TO GROWTH Police Vahirles and Comrnunirations Fauipment Police Vehicles:Units Needed to Serve Growth CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE(1) 1 2 3 4 5 10 5-Year 10-Year Vehicles(Units Needed) LOS 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Total Total Units Per Persons 0.0012 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 Units Per Nonres Trips 0.0001 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 Annual Units 0.6 0.6 07 0.8 0.8 1.1 Cumulative Units 1 1 2 3 3 9 3 9 Vehicle Costs Cost L.__ _ Cost per Unit $51,132 I $29,686 $32,581 $35,370 $38,402 $41,380 $58,736 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS 529,686 $62,267 $97,637 $136,040 $177420 $435,107 $177,420 $435,107 Police Communications Equipment:Units Needed to Serve Growth CURRENT LEVELS OF SERVICE 12) 1 2 3 4 5 10 5-Year 10-Year Communications Equipment(Units Needed) LOS 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Total Total Units Per Persons 0.0042 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 3.4 Units Per Nonres Trips 0.0005 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 Annual Square Feet 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.9 Cumulative Square Feet 2 4 6 9 12 29 12 29 Communications Equipment Costs Cost Cost per Unit $5,690 $11,232 $12,327 $13,382 $14,530 $15,656 $22,223 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS $11,232 $23,559 $36,941 $51,471 $67128 $164,625 $67,128 $164,625 GRAND TOTAL POLICE COSTS(Annual Due to Growth) GRAND TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS $40,918 $44,909 $48,752 $52,932 $57,037 $80,959 GRAND TOTAL CUMULATIVE COSTS $40,918 585,826 $134,579 $187,511 $244,547 $599,732 $244,547 $599,732 [1]See Figure 24:Incremental Expansion-Vehicles [2]See Figure 25•Incremental Expansion-Communications Equipment 37 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Police Facilities Improvements Plan Lastly, identified below is the 10-year plan for necessary Police Facilities improvements and expansions identified by City of Apache Junction as qualified for development fee revenue As demand is generated for identified Police Facilities improvements, investments identified below will be made Figure 28: Necessary Police Facilities Expansions Necessary Public Service Division Units Total Vehicles Patrol 3 $116,000 Crime Scene Investigations 1 $51,000 Incremental Expansion 5 $268,107 Mobile Communications Equipment Patrol 10 $68,000 Telecommunications 8 $52,000 Stationary Communications System Patrol 2 $1,500 Telecommunications 2 $40,000 Crime Scene Investigations 1 $85,000 Dispatch Console Telecommunications 1 $115,000 TOTAL $796,607 38 luschlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE POLICE FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FEES The proposed development fees for Police Facilities are shown in the figure below. Figure 29• Proposed Police Facilities Development Feess Police Facilities Residential Level Of Service and Capital Costs Per Person Vehicle Costs [4] $63.06 Communications Equipment Costs [5] $2386 IIP and Development Fee Study Cost $6.44 GROSS CAPITAL COST $93.36 Required Offset Revenue Credit [Placeholder] NET CAPITAL COST $93.36 Police Facilities Residential Development Fee Schedule Development Fee per Housing Unit Persons per Cost per Development Fee Increase Unit Type Housing Unit(1) Person Proposed Current(2) (Decrease) Single Unit 173 X $93.36 = - $161 $294 ($133) Single Unit-Manufactured 121 X $93.36 = $113 $234 ($121) 2+Unit 1 39 X $93.36 = $129 $254 ($125) Police Facilities Nonresidential Level Of Service and Capital Costs Per Nonres Trip Vehicle Costs [4] $758 Communications Equipment Costs [5] $2.87 IlPand Development Fee Study Cost $0.31 GROSS CAPITAL COST $10.76 ... Required Offset Revenue Credit [Placeholder] NET CAPITAL COST $10.76 Police Facilities Nonresidential Development Fee Schedule Development Fee per Housing Unit Cost per Development Fee Increase Nonresidential Land Use Vehicle Tri.s 3 Nonres Trip Pro•• ed Current 2 Decrease per 1,000 SF (Per Square Foot of Floor Area) Commercial 14.09 X $1076 = $0.15 $1.80 ($1.64) Office 5.52 X $10 76 = $0.06 $0 68 ($0.62) Industrial 349 X $1076 = $0.04 $0.27 ($023) [1] Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [2] Current fee established in 2012 [3] See Figure 26.Police Facilities Ratio of Service Units to Land Use Vehicle Trip rates for 1,000 S F are divided by 1,000 to calculate a proposed fee per square foot of floor area [4] See Figure 24 Incremental Expansion—Vehicles [5] See Figure 25 Incremental Expansion—Communications Equipment 5 The development fees presented herein are for informational purposes only The final maximum supportable development fees will be adjusted in accordance with the findings of the Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvements Plan review and adoption process Further adjustment will be made to reflect any necessary offset revenue credits as required by ARS 9- 463.05(E)(7) 39 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona CASH FLOW ANALYSIS The cash flow summary shown in Figure 30 provides an indication of the development fee revenue and expenditures necessary to meet the demand for growth-related Police Facilities. Necessary expenditures associated with the incremental expansion of Police vehicles and communications equipment are calculated based on current costs per unit, and on maintaining the current levels of service Figure 30: Police Facilities Cash Flow Summary6 5-Year 1 2 3 4 5 Average Cumulative (Current$in thousands) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Annual Total REVENUES aouce 3 Police Fee-Single Unit Res $33 $36 $40 $44 $48 $40 $200 4 Police Fee-2+Unit Res $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $12 5 Police Fee-Commercial $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $25 6 Police Fee-Office $3 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $18 7 Police Fee-Industrial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2 Subtotal Police Fees $43 $48 $51 $56 $60 $51 $257 CAPITAL COSTS Douce Police Vehicles $30 $33 $35 $38 $41 $35 $177 Police Communications Equipment $11 $12 $13 $15 $16 $13 $67 — IIP and Development Fee Study $3 $3 $3 $4 $4 $3 $16 Subtotal Police Costs $44 $48 $52 $56 $61 $52 $261 CASH FLOW NET CAPITAL FACILITIES CASH FLOW- POLICE Current$in thousands Annual Surplus(or Deficit) ($0) ($0) ($1) ($1) ($1) ($1) Cumulative Surplus(or Deficit) ($0) ($0) ($1) ($2) ($3) ($3) Source TischlerBise;Land Use Assumptions 6 The cash flow is shown in rounded figures However,the analysis itself uses figures carried to their ultimate decimal places, therefore the sums and products generated in the analysis may not equal the sum or product if the reader replicates the calculation with the factors shown in the memo(due to the rounding of figures shown,not in the analysis) 40 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona STREET FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PLAN OVERVIEW ARS 9-463 05(T)(7)(f) defines the facilities and assets that can be included in the Street Facilities IIP as "Street facilities located in the service area, including arterial or collector streets or roads that have been designated on an officially adopted plan of the municipality, traffic signals and rights-of-way and improvements thereon " The Street Facilities IIP includes components for street improvements and the cost of preparing the Street Facilities IIP and development fees The cost recovery/buy- in methodology is used to calculate the minor arterial component of the Street Facilities IIP; and an incremental expansion methodology is used to calculate the collectors and signalized intersections components of the Street Facilities IIP SERVICE AREA ARS 9-463 05(T)(9) defines "service area" as follows "any specified area within the boundaries of a municipality in which development will be served by necessary public services or facility expansions and within which a substantial nexus exists between the necessary public services or facility expansions and the development being served as prescribed in the infrastructure improvements plan " The City of Apache Junction plans to provide a uniform level of service for Street facilities throughout the City As described in Apache Junction's 2010 General Plan Update, the City of Apache Junction ensures, "vital transportation and circulation infrastructure will be available to support easy access to jobs, schools, recreation, and regional travel." A May 2012 Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study conducted by Jacobs cataloged existing streets in Apache Junction, and found City of Apache Junction roadways operate at a level of service (LOS) at or above LOS C (except for a section of Apache Trail on which there exist intentional traffic calming design features) The current inventory of City of Apache Junction roadways has capacity to absorb additional vehicle miles traveled. In the next five years, City of Apache Junction expects development of the southern portion of the City, between Baseline Avenue and the incorporated municipal boundary, to develop as part of a master planned development Lost Dutchman Heights. It will be necessary for City of Apache Junction to improve the City roadways to maintain circulation within the City Once development of Lost Dutchman Heights begins in earnest, it may become necessary to establish separate service areas for Street Facilities development fees However, for the purposes of this five-year study window the City of Apache Junction is considered a single service area, shown as within the "Study Area" indicated in Figure 31 below. TischlerBise 41 DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure 31:Street Facilities Service Area Map FIGURE 2.19:AVERAGE DAILY LEVEL OF SERVICE CONDITIONS V� r & iatd_ _____.__i Kbp r "� y, 0 Iii! I 1 1 a l /J� < 1 Lost Dutchman Bh. 1 1 t 1 1 No. re $ i 1 M BUpHatabn 8M1 1 t I / C I ,,,Apachs Tr, JuM.lbn bl b (3<stisssN E S 1 Brost7way tr ( ai ! t3 n d L r� ' 1 Met At. -y Syr I 1 Bouthun km p I 1 " , 1 1 r- Ratak.As.. 11V;pt 1 1 t 1 I I i//'' • NI 1 +, w _ 1 ^-- t t(,I N D ^—---- -- y LOS v 105 A LJ Study Ar.a ^ LOS C Local Roadway • Gay Boundary v LOS B 0 a County Island JACOBS Source Jacob (2012)Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study 42 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona ask PROPORTIONATE SHARE ARS 9-463 05 (B)(3) states that the development fee shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of necessary public services needed to provide necessary public services to the development Trip generation rates and trip adjustment factors are used to determine the proportionate impact of residential, commercial, office, and industrial land uses on the City's roadways. IIP FOR STREET FACILITIES For each necessary public service that is the subject of a development fee, ARS 9-463.05(E) requires the IIP to include seven elements This section details each of these seven elements for the Street Facilities IIP A forecast of new revenues not generated by development fees can be found in later in the report. ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY, USAGE,AND COSTS OF EXISTING PUBLIC SERVICES ARS 9-463 05(E)(1) requires "A description of the existing necessary public services in the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, correct or replace those necessary public services to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable " ,,.1k, ARS 9-463.05 (E)(2) requires: "An analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing necessary public services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable." Tischler8ise 43 DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Current Inventory The City of Apache Junction has a total Street facilities inventory of 143 79 miles, made up of 106 49 miles of minor arterial streets and 37 30 miles of collector streets, all of which operate with a level of service at or above C, as reported by the 2012 Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study There are 18 signalized intersections maintained by the City of Apache Junction Department of Public Works Figure 32:City-Maintained Street Facilities Inventory Minor Arterials Collectors Road Miles Lanes Lane Miles Road Miles Lanes Lane Miles Lost Dutchman Blvd 4.00 2 8.00 Meridian Dr 210 2 4.20 Superstition Blvd 5 60 2 4 15.40 Delaware Dr 2.50 2-4 5.90 Broadway Ave 4.50 2-3 13.00 McKellips Blvd 350 2 700 Southern Ave 3.08 2-4 9.54 Ironwood Dr 1.00 2 2.00 Baseline Ave 420 2-3 8.60 Idaho Rd 110 2 220 Meridian Dr 3.00 2-4 675 Tomahawk Rd 0.60 2 1.20 Ironwood Dr 5 90 2-4 21 60 16th Ave 2.50 2-4 8.60 Idaho Rd 180 2-4 4.50 San Marcos Dr. 1.00 4 4.00 Tomahawk Rd 4.00 2-4 9.30 Phelps Dr 0.50 2 3 1 20 Goldfield Rd 4.00 2 4 9.80 Royal Palm Rd 1.00 1 1.00 Mountain View Rd 3.40 2 6.80 _ __ TOTAL 106.49 TOTAL 37 30 Signalized Intersections Count City Maintained 18 Am., Source City of Apache Junction; Dept of Public Works Source.Jacob. (2012)Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study The steps to calculate a current level of service for the City of Apache Junction Street facilities involve calibrating existing development to the arterial and collector street networks To do so, development units by type are multiplied by adjusted vehicle trip ends per development unit. The factors used to calculate the current levels of service expressed in Vehicle Miles of Travel--a measurement unit equal to one vehicle traveling one mile--are discussed below, and shown in the Current Level of Service section after the discussion. 44 schlerBise Ti DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Trip Generation Rates Street Facilities development fees are based on average weekday vehicle trip ends, adjusted for commuting patterns and pass-by trips and weighted by trip length Trip generation rates are from the reference book Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE 9th Edition, 2012). A Vehicle Trip End represents a vehicle either entering or exiting a development (as if a traffic counter were placed across a driveway) To calculate Street Facilities development fees, trip generation rates require an adjustment factor to avoid double counting each trip at both the origin and destination points Therefore, the basic trip adjustment factor is 50 percent. As discussed further below, the development fee methodology includes additional adjustments to make the fees proportionate to the infrastructure demand for particular types of development Residential Vehicle Trip Ends As an alternative to simply using the national average trip generation rate for residential development, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publishes regression curve formulas that may be used to derive custom trip generation rates using local demographic data Key independent variables needed for the analysis (i e,vehicles available, housing units, households, and persons) are available from the 2011 ACS Estimates for Apache Junction. These data were used to derive custom average weekday vehicle trip ends by type of housing As shown in Figure 33, customer residential trip ends per housing unit in Apache Junction are 5.60 for single residential units,-and 4 40 for multifamily units, each of which are lower than the national average of 9 52 and 6 65 respectively. (Note: Housing unit estimates from the ACS will not equal decennial census counts of units, nor the land use assumptions. These data are used to derive the custom average trip ends by type of housing unit, as shown below ) i Figure 33:Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends by Housing Type City of Apache Junction,AZ Households[2] Vehicles per Vehicles Units Household Available[1] Single Family Multifamily Total by Tenure A B C D=B+C E=A/D Owner-occupied 18,863 11,363 156 11,519 1 64 Renter-occupied 3,666 1,957 1,042 2,999 1 22 TOTAL 22,529 13,320 1,198 14,518 1.55 Housing Units[3]=> 18,248 1,597 19,845 Persons per Housing Unit=> 1 73 1.39 [1]Vehicles available by tenure from Table B25046,American Community Survey,2011 [2]Households by tenure and units in structure from Table B25032, American Community Survey,2011 [3]Housing units from Table B25024,American Community Survey,201118 Persons in Trip Vehicles by Trip Average Trip Ends per iTE Trip Ends Difference Households Ends Type of Housing Ends Trip Ends Housing per From F :Ilwner(B*E)+ G=Avg of Unit Unit ITE [4] [5] Renter(B*E) [6] [5],[6] H=G/[3] (7] Single Family Units 31,558 81,723 21,000 121,320 101,521 5.60 9.52 392 Multifamily Units 2,212 7,611 1,529 6,319 6,965 4.40 6.65 2 25 TOTAL 33,770 89,334 22,529 127,638 108,486 5.50 [4]Total population in households from Table25033,American Community Survey,2011 [5]Vehicle trips ends based on persons using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2012) For single family housing(ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.91*LN(persons)+1.52) To approximate the average population of the ITE studies persons were divided by 57 and the equation result multiplied by 57 For multifamily housing(ITE 220),the fitted curve equation is(3.47*persons)-64.48 [6]Vehicle trip ends based on vehicles available using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2012) For single family housing(ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.99*LN(vehicles)+1.81) To approximate the average number of vehicles in the ITE studies,vehicles available were divided by 77 and the equation result multiplied by 77 For multifamily housing(ITE 220) the fitted curve equation is(3.94*vehicles)+293.58 /\ J71 Trio Generation,Institute of Transportation Engineers,9th Edition(2012) 45 schlerBise Ti DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona .r Nonresidential Vehicle Trip Ends Vehicle trip ends for nonresidential development are from the reference book Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE 9th Edition, 2012). The shaded categories in Figure 34 represent the proxy categories used to determine existing and projected trips from nonresidential development in the City of Apache Junction. Figure 34:The Institute of Transportation Engineers, Nonresidential Trip Ends,2012 ITE Land Use/Size Demand Weekday Trip Ends per Emp Per Sq Ft Code Unit Demand Unit* Employee* Dmd Unit** Per Emp Commercial/Shopping Center 820 Average 1,000 Sq Ft 42.70 na 2.00 500 General Office 710 Average 1,000 Sq Ft 11.03 3.32 3.32 301 Other Nonresidential 770 Business Park*** 1,000 Sq Ft 12 44 4 04 3 08 325 760 Research&Dev Center 1,000 Sq Ft 8.11 2 77 2 93 342 610 Hospital 1,000 Sq Ft 13 22 4 50 2 94 340 565 Day Care student 4 38 26.73 0.16 na 550 University/College student 1.71 - 8 96 0 19 na 530 High School student 1.71 19 74 0 09 na 520 Elementary School student 1 29 15 71 0 08 na 520 Elementary School 1,000 Sq Ft 15 43 15.71 0.98 1,018 rob, 320 Lodging room 5 63 12.81 0.44 na 254 Assisted Living bed 2 66 3 93 0 68 na 151 Mini-Warehouse r 1,000 Sq Ft 2.50 61 90 0 04 24,760 150 Warehousing 1,000 Sq Ft 3 56 3 89 0 92 1,093 140 Manufacturing 1,000 Sq Ft 3 82 2.13 1.79 558 110 Light Industrial 1,000 Sq Ft 6.97 3.02 2.31 433 * Trip Generation,Institute of Transportation Engineers,9th Edition (2012) ** Employees per demand unit calculated from trip rates,except for Shopping Center data,which are derived from Development Handbook and Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers,published by the Urban Land Institute. 46 schlerBise Ti DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Adjustment for Journey-To-Work Commuting Residential development in the City of Apache Junction has a trip adjustment factor of 64 percent to account for commuters leaving Apache Junction for work According to the National Household Travel Survey(2011), home-based work trips are typically 31 percent of"production"trips, in other words, out- bound trips (which are 50 percent of all trip ends) The LED OnTheMap data from 2010 indicates that 90 percent of Apache Junction's employed residents travel outside the City for work In combination,these factors (0.31 x 0 50 x 0 90 = 0.14) account for 14 percent of additional production trips. The total adjustment factor for residential includes attraction trips (50% of trip ends) plus the journey-to-work commuting adjustment(14%of production trips)for a total of 64 percent. Figure 35•Adjustment for Journey-to-Work Commuting Trip Adjustment Factor for Commuters(1] Employed Residents 12,031 Residents Working in City 1,236 Residents Commuting Outside City for Work 10,795 Percent Commuting out of the City 90% Additional Production Trips [2] 14% Residential Trip Adjustment Factor 64% ..� [1]US Census Bureau,2010 OnTheMap Application(version 6.1 1)a nd LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics [2]Outbound trip statistics from National Household Travel Survey,2009 Ta ble 30 Adjustment for Pass-By Trips For commercial development, the trip adjustment factor is less than 50 percent because retail development and some services attract vehicles as they pass by on arterial and collector roads For example, when someone stops at a convenience store on the way home from work, the convenience store is not the primary destination For the average shopping center, the ITE data indicate that 34 percent of the vehicles that enter are passing by on their way to some other primary destination Because attraction trips are half of all trips, the trip adjustment factor is 66 percent multiplied by 50 percent, or approximately 33 percent of the trip ends (see the Current Level of Service section) These factors are shown to derive inbound vehicle trips for each type of nonresidential land use Trip Length Weighting Factor by Type of Land Use The Street Facilities calculation methodology includes a percentage adjustment, or weighting factor, to account for trip length variation by type of land use. As documented in Table 6 of the 2009 National Household Travel Survey, vehicle trips from residential development are approximately 121 percent of the average trip length. The residential trip length adjustment factor includes data on home-base work trips, social, and recreational purposes. Conversely, shopping trips associated with commercial development are roughly 66 percent of the average trip length while other nonresidential development typically accounts for trips that are 73 percent of the average for all trips 47 Tischler$ise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Lane Capacity In August 2006, Pinal County released the Pinal County Small Area Transportation Study Final Report Recommendations made in the report sought to prepare the County's roadways for the forecasted population growth of an additional 250,000 over the course of 20 years The study examined roadways within the County and established daily per-lane capacities for each classification of roadways Daily per- lane capacities of roadways in Pinal County were established to be 8,700 for minor arterials and 7,500 for collectors This equates to a weighted average capacity for the Apache Junction Street facilities of 8,400 Figure 36•Daily Per-Lane Capacity Existing Lane Daily Per-Lane Classification Miles [1] Capacity[2]* Minor Arterial 10649 8,700 Collector 3730 7,500 Minor Arterial &Collector 14379 8,400 [1]City of Apache Junction,Dept of Public Works [2]Pinal County Transportation Plan,2000 Update *Weighted Average Formula 106.49 X 8,700. + 3730. X 7.500 = 8,400 143 79 143.79 Rounded • - - Current Level of Service Shown below are a series of figures demonstrating the calibration of existing development to the current inventory of City minor arterials, collectors, and signalized intersections It is necessary to calculate each separately in crder to then calculate the cost per demand unit for each component 48 lischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Minor Arterial Figure 37 shows the calibration of existing development to the current City minor arterial street network Knowing the current lane mile inventory of 106.49, and the daily per-lane capacity (8,700) of the street network,TischlerBise, using a series of spreadsheet iterations, determined the common factor necessary to evenly distribute the vehicle miles of travel on the existing minor arterial network to be a weighted-average trip length of 7 92 miles (rounded) As shown in Figure 37 below, existing development within Apache Junction attracted an estimated 926,463 Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) to minor arterials in 2013, based on the trip generation, trip adjustment, trip length factor and other assumptions shown. A VMT is a measurement unit equal to one vehicle traveling one mile In the aggregate, VMT is the product of vehicle trips multiplied by the average trip length'. Therefore, the current infrastructure standard is 1 15 lane miles per 10,000 VMT (i e, 106 49 lane miles divided by 926,463 VMT expressed in ten-thousands). Figure 37• Existing Level of Service-City Minor Arterials Step 1 Vehicle Trips Generate from Existing Development Avg WkdyVeh Trip Development Dev. Trip Ends per Adjustment Vehicle Type[1] Unit Dev.Unit[2] Factors[3] Trips RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 21,199 X 5.60 X 64% = 75,977 Multi-Unit 1,904 X 4.40 X 64% = 5,362 NONRESIDENTIAL Commercial KSF 1,117 X 4270 X 33% = 15,733 Office KSF 1,823 X 11.03 X 50% = 10,055 Industrial KSF 348 X 6.97 X 50% = 1,213 ro , Step 2 Vehicle Miles of Travel from Existing Development Development Vehicle Avg Trip Trip Length Vehicle Miles Type Trips Length[4] Weighting Factor[5] of Travel RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 75,977 X 792 X 121% = 727,788 Multi Unit 5,362 X 792 X 121% = 51,360 NONRESIDENTIAL Step 3-Even Distribution Commerci a I KSF 15,733 X 7 92 X 66% = 82,202 of VMT on Existing Arterial Network Office KSF 10,055 X 792 X 73% = 58,106 Existing _ Daily Per- Industrial KSF , 1,213 X 792 X 73% = 7,007 Lane Miles[6] Lane Capacity[7] TOTAL Vehicle Miles of Travel 926,463 = 106.49 X 8,700 Step 4 Level of Service Vehicle Miles Level of Level of Service Units of Travel Service Lane Miles per 10,000 VMT 106.49 - 92.6463 = 1.15 [1]Single Unit=SFD,SFA,and Mobile Homes,KSF=square feet of floor area in thousands ]2]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [3]Residential Development Fee Draft Land Use Assumptions Nonresidential Trip Generation,Institute of Transportation Engineers,2012 [4]Avg Trip Length,expressed on miles,is the single factor that equates to the even distribution of vehicle miles of travel on the existing system [5]On an average weekday,half of all top ends are inbound Retail and institutional include 34%pass-by adjustment(i.e 66%are primary trips) The residential adjustment factor accounts for 90%of employed residents commuting to jobs outside the City [6]City of Apache Junction,Dept of Public Works [7]Pinal County Transportation Plan,2000 Update 7 Typical VMT calculations for development-specific traffic studies, along with most transportation models of an entire urban area, are derived from traffic counts on particular road segments multiplied by the length of that road segment For the .ter►, purpose of development fees,VMT calculations are based on attraction(inbound)trips to development located in the service area,with the trip lengths calibrated to the road network considered to be system improvements This refinement eliminates pass-through or external trips,and travel on roads that are not system improvements(e g interstate highways) 49 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Collector Figure 38 shows the calibration of existing development to the current City collector street network Knowing the current lane mile inventory of 37 30, and the daily per-lane capacity (7,500) of the street network,Tischler8ise, using a series of spreadsheet iterations, determined the common factor necessary to evenly distribute the vehicle miles of travel on the existing collector network to be a weighted- average trip length of 2 39 miles (rounded). As shown in Figure 38 below, existing development within Apache Junction attracted an estimated 279,757 Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) to collectors in 2013, based on the trip generation,trip adjustment,trip length factor and other assumptions shown A VMT is a measurement unit equal to one vehicle traveling one mile. In the aggregate, VMT is the product of vehicle trips multiplied by the average trip length. Therefore, the current infrastructure standard is 1 33 lane miles per 10,000 VMT(i e, 37 30 lane miles divided by 279,757 VMT expressed in ten-thousands). Figure 38: Existing Level of Service-City Collectors Step 1-Vehicle Trips Generate from Existing Development Avg WkdyVeh Trip Development Dev. Trip Ends per Adjustment Vehicle Type[1] Unit Dev.Unit[2] Factors [3] Trips RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 21,199 X 560 X 64% _�-- 75,977 Multi Unit 1.904 X 4.40 X 64% = 5,362 NONRESIDENTIAL Commercial KSF 1,117 X 4270 X 33% = 15,733 Office KSF 1,823 X 1103 X 50% = 10,055 Industrial KSF 348 X 6.97 X 50% = 1,213 Step 2-Vehicle Miles of Travel from Existing Develo•ment Development Vehicle Avg Trip Trip Length Vehicle Miles Type Trips Length [4] -Weighting Factor[5] of Travel RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 75,977 X 2.39 X 121% = 219,764 Multi-Unit 5,362 X 2.39 X 121% = 15,509 NONRESIDENTIAL Step 3-Even Distribution Commercial KSF 15,733 X 2.39 X 66% = 24,822 of VMT on Existing Collector Network Office KSF 10,055 X 239 X 73% = 17,546 Existing Daily Per- Industrial KSF 1,213 X 2.39 X 73% = 2,116 Lane Miles[6] Lane Capacity[7] TOTAL Vehicle Miles of Travel 279,757 = 3730 X 7,500 Step 4-Level of Service Vehicle Miles Level of Level of Service Units of Travel Service Lane Miles per 10,000 VMT 37.30 - 27 9757 = 1 33 [1] Single Unit=SFD,SFA,and Mobile Homes,KSF=square feet of floor area in thousands [2]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [3]Residential Development Fee Draft Land Use Assumptions Nonresidential Trio Generation,Institute of Transportation Engineers, (4]Avg Trip Length,expressed in miles,is the single factor that equates to the even distribution of vehicle miles of travel on the existing system (5]On an average weekday,half of all trip ends are inbound Retail and institutional include 34%pass-by adjustment(i e 66%are primary trips) The residential adjustment factor accounts for 90%of employed residents [6]City of Apache Junction,Dept of Public Works [7]Pinal County Transportation Plan,2000 Update 50 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Signalized Intersections Figure 39 shows the calibration of existing development to the current Street facilities network which includes 18 signalized intersections. Knowing the current lane mile inventory of 143 79, and the daily per-lane capacity (8,400) of the street network, TischlerBise, using a series of spreadsheet iterations, determined the common factor necessary to evenly distribute the vehicle miles of travel on the existing street network to be a weighted-average trip length of 10.32 miles (rounded) As shown in Figure 39 below, existing development within Apache Junction attracted an estimated 1,207,852 Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) in 2013, based on the trip generation, trip adjustment, trip length factor and other assumptions shown A VMT is a measurement unit equal to one vehicle traveling one mile In the aggregate, VMT is the product of vehicle trips multiplied by the average trip length Therefore, the current infrastructure standard is 1.19 lane miles, and 0 15 signalized intersections per 10,000 VMT(i e, 18 units divided by 1,207,852 VMT expressed in ten-thousands). Figure 39: Existing Level of Service—Signalized Intersections Step 1-Vehicle Trips Generate from Existing Development Avg Wkdy Veh Trip Development Dev. Trip Ends per Adjustment Vehicle Type[1] Unit Dev.Unit[2] Factors[3] Trips RESIDENTIAL Single Unit ' 21,199 X 5.60 X 64% = 75,977 Multi-Unit 1,904 X 4.40 X 64% = 5,362 NONRESIDENTIAL Commercial KSF 1,117 X 4270 X 33% = 15,733 Office KSF 1,823 X 11.03 X 50% = 10,055 Industrial KSF 348 X 6.97 X 50% = 1,213 Step 2-Vehicle Miles of Travel from Existing Development Development Vehicle Avg Trip Trip Length Vehicle Miles Type Trips Length[4] Weighting Factor[5] of Travel RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 75,977 X 10.32 X 121% = 948,835 Multi Unit 5,362 X 10.32 X 121% = 66,959 NONRESIDENTIAL Step 3-Even Distribution Commercial KSF 15,733 X 10.32 X 66% = 107,168 of VMT on Existing Street Network Office KSF 10,055 X 10.32 X 73% = 75,755 -- Existing Daily Per- — Industrial KSF 1,213 X 10.32 X 73% = 9,136 Lane Miles [6] Lane Capacity[7] TOTAL Vehicle Miles of Travel 1,207,852 = 14379 X 8,400 Step 4-Level of Service Vehicle Miles Level of Level of Service Units of Travel Service Lane Miles per 10,000 VMT 14379 - 1207852 = 119 Signalized Intersections per 10,000 VMT 18.00 - 120 7852 = 0.15 [1] Single Unit=SFD,SFA,and Mobile Homes,KSF=square feet of floor area in thousands [2]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [3]Residential Development Fee Draft Land Use Assumptions Nonresidential Trio Generation,Institute of Transportation Engineers,2012 [4]Avg Trip Length,expressed in miles,is the single factor that equates to the even distribution of vehicle miles of travel on the existing system [5]On an average weekday,half of all trip ends are inbound Retail and institutional include 34%pass-by adjustment(i.e 66%are primary trips) The residential adjustment factor accounts for 90%of employed residents commuting to jobs outside the City [6]City of Apache Junction,Dept of Public Works [7]Pinal County Transportation Plan,2000 Update 51 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Cost per Lane Mile Minor Arterials In 2006, the City of Apache Junction executed an intergovernmental agreement between the City and Pinal County concerning shared costs for the reconstruction and redesign of Ironwood Drive within the City limits of Apache Junction The agreement defined the responsibilities and financial obligations of the City for its proportionate share of the project costs to improve and expand a 2 2 mile segment of the minor arterial Ironwood Drive, between Elliott Avenue and U.S 60 The complete project involved improvements to the 4 4 lane miles of existing roadway including new payment, curb and gutters, drainage facilities, sidewalks, street lighting, and a center median, and increasing capacity by adding 4.4 lane miles The nominal value of the City's proportionate share was calculated to be$10,685,714 This equates to a cost per lane mile of$1,214,286 Cost per Lane Mile Total Project Miles Cost per Lane Classification Project Cost Improved Mile Minor Artenal Ironwood Dr(ElliottAve to US 60) $10,685,714 — 88 = $1,214,286 Source City of Apache Junction,Finance Department Collectors Included in the 2012 Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study were Street facilities improvements to collectors that would be necessary based on short/medium/long term development projections A sample of short-term improvements identified in the Study was used to calculate an average cost per lane mile for Collectors. Shown below are four Street facilities improvements In total, there are 3 76 miles of collector improvements with an estimated cost of$2,774,871 in 2013 dollars (i.e, not inflated over time).This equates to an average cost per lane mile of$737,998 per collector. Figure 40.Cost per Lane Mile for Collector Roadways Total Project Project 11) Cost[1j Idaho Road (Roundup to Foothill) $1,108,269 16th Ave(Delaware to Cedar) $835,400 16th Ave(Cedar to Meridian) $277,067 16th Ave(Idaho to Winchester) $554,135 Planned Projects $2,774,871 Total Lane Miles Added 3 76 Cost per Lane Mile $737,998 [lj City of Apache Junction,Public Works Dept, Jacobs.(May2012) Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study TischlerBise 52 DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Signalized Intersections The City of Apache Junction's Department of Public Works provided project details for two recently completed signalized intersections projects According to the City's share of project costs, the average cost per signalized intersection is$120,000 Figure 41•Cost per Lane Mile for Street Facilities Recent Completed Signalized Intersection Project Cost Phelps Dr at Broadway Ave $115,000 Old West Hgwyat Winchester Rd $125,000 Avg.Cost per Signalized Intersection $120,000 [1]City of Apache Junction,Public Works Dept TischlerBise 53 DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona RATIO OF SERVICE UNIT TO LAND USE ARS 9-463.05 (E)(4) requires "A table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation or discharge of a service unit for each category of necessary public services or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial and industrial." Figure 42, Figure 43, and Figure 44 display the ratios of a service unit to various types of land uses for residential and nonresidential development As discussed previously, Street Facilities development fees are based on average weekday vehicle trip ends, adjusted for commuting patterns and pass-by trips and weighted by trip length Trip generation rates are from the reference book Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE 9th Edition, 2012). A Vehicle Trip End represents a vehicle either entering or exiting a development (as if a traffic counter were placed across a driveway) To calculate Street Facilities development fees, trip generation rates require an adjustment factor to avoid double counting each trip at both the origin and destination points Therefore,the basic trip adjustment factor is 50 percent As discussed in the previous section, the development fee methodology includes additional adjustments to make the fees proportionate to the demand for different types of Street facilities by particular types of development Shown below are the Ratios for Minor Arterial roadways, Collector roadways, and Signalized Intersections Figure 42:Ratio of Service Unit to Land Use-Minor Arterial Roadways Step 1 Vehicle Trips Generate from Net New Development Avg Wkdy Veh Trip Development Development Units[1] Trip Ends per Adjustment Vehicle Type[1] 2013 2023 Net New Dev Unit[2] Factors[3] Trips RESI DENTIAL Single Unit 21,199 24,333 3,134 X 5.60 X 64% = 11,231 Multi Unit 1,904 2,185 281 X 4.40 X 64% = 793 NONRESIDENTIAL Commercial KSF 1,117 1,472 355 X 4270 X 33% = 5,002 Office KSF 1,823 2,494 671 X 11.03 X 50% = 3,698 Industrial KSF 348 453 105 X 6.97 X 50% = 365 Step 2 Vehicle Mlles of Travel from Net New Development Development Vehicle Avg Trip Trip Length Vehicle Miles Type Trips Length[4] Weighting Factor[5] of Travel RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 11,231 X 792 X 121% = 107,579 Multi Unit 793 X 7.92 X 121% = 7,592 NONRESIDENTIAL Commercial KSF 5,002 X 792 X 66% = 26,137 Office KSF 3,698 X 792 X 73% = 21,374 Industrial KSF 365 X 792 X 73% = 2,112 Net New Vehicle Miles of Travel 164,793 [1] Single Unit=SFD,SFA,and Mobile Homes,KSF=square feet of floor area in thousands Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [2]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [3]Residential Development Fee Draft Land Use Assumptions Nonresidential Trip Generation,Institute of Transportation (4]Avg.Trip Length,expressed in miles,is the single factor that equates to the even distribution of vehicle miles of travel on the existing system [5]On an average weekday,half of all trip ends are inbound. Retail and institutional include 34%pass by adjustment(i.e 66%are primary trips) The residential adjustment factor accounts for 90%of employed 54 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure 43• Ratio of Service Unit to Land Use-Collector Roadways Step 1 Vehicle Trips Generate from Net New Development Avg WkdyVeh Trip Development Development Units[1] Trip Ends per Adjustment Vehicle Type[1] 2013 2023 Net New Dev.Unit[2] Factors[3] Trips RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 21,199 24,333 3,134 X 5.60 X 64% = 11,231 Multi SID 1,904 2,185 281 X X 64% _ 793 NONRESI DENTIAL Commercial KSF 1,117 1,472 355 X 4270 X 33% = 5,002 Office KSF 1,823 2,494 671 X 11.03 X 50% = 3,698 Industrial KSF 348 453 105 X 6.97 X 50% = 365 Step 2 Vehicle Miles of Travel from Net New Development Development Vehicle Avg Trip Trip Length Vehicle Miles Type Trips Length[4] Weighting Factor[5] of Travel RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 11,231 X 2.39 X 121% = 32,485 Multi Unit 793 X 2.39 X 121% = 2,292 NONRESI DENTIAL Commercial KSF 5,002 X 2.39 X 66% = 7,892 Office KSF 3,698 X 2.39 X 73% = 6,454 Industrial KSF 365 X 2.39 X 73% = 638 Net New Vehicle Miles of Travel 49,761 [I) Single Unit=SFD,SFA,and Mobile Homes,KSF=square feet of floor area in thousands Development Fee Land Use Assumptions (2]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [3)Residential Development Fee Draft Land Use Assumptions Nonresidential Trip Generation,Institute of Transportation (4)Avg Trip Length,expressed in miles,is the single factor that equates to the even distribution of vehicle miles of travel on the existing system [5]On an average weekday,half of all trip ends are inbound Retail and institutional include 34%pass by adjustment(i.e 66%are primary trips) The residential adjustment factor accounts for 90%of employed Figure 44• Ratio of Service Unit to Land Use-Signalized Intersections Step 1 Vehicle Trips Generate from Net New Development Avg WkdyVeh Trip Development Development Units[1] Trip Ends per Adjustment Vehicle Type[1] 2013 2023 Net New Dev.Unit[2) Factors[3] Trips RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 21,199 24,333 3,134 X 5.60 X 64% = 11,231 Multi Unit 1,904 2,185 281 X 4.40 X NONRESIDENTIAL Commercial KSF 1,117 1,472 355 X 4270 X 33% = 5,002 Office KSF 1,823 2,494 671 X 11.03 X 50% = 3,698 Industrial KSF 348 453 105 X 6.97 X 50% = 365 Step 2 Vehicle Miles of Travel from Net New Development Development Vehicle Avg Trip Trip Length Vehicle Miles Type Trips Length[4] Weighting Factor[5] of Travel RESIDENTIAL Single Unit 11,231 X 10.32 X 121% = 140,253 Multi Unit 793 X 10.32 X 121% = 9,898 NONRESIDENTIAL Commercial KSF 5,002 X 10.32 X 66% = 34,075 Office KSF 3,698 X 10.32 X 73% = 27,866 Industrial KSF 365 X 10.32 X 73% = 2753 Net New Vehicle Miles of Travel 214,845 (I]Single Unit=SFD,SFA,and Mobile Homes,KSF=square feet of floor area in thousands Development Fee Land Use Assumptions (2]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions (3]Residential Development Fee Draft Land Use Assumptions Nonresidential Trip Generation,Institute of Transportation (4]Avg.Trip Length,expressed in miles is the single factor that equates to the even distribution of vehicle miles of travel on the existing system (5]On an average weekday,half of all trip ends are inbound Retail and institutional include 34%pass by adjustment(i.e 66%are primary trips) The residential adjustment factor accounts for 90%of employed 55 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona PROJECTED DEMAND FOR SERVICES AND COSTS ARS 9-463 05(E)(3) requires: "A description of all or the parts of the necessary public services of facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, including a forecast of the costs of infrastructure, improvements, real property, financing, engineering and architectural services, which shall be prepared by qualified professionals licensed in this state, as applicable" ARS 9-463 05(E)(5) requires. "The total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated pursuant to generally accepted engineering and planning criteria." ARS 9-463.05(E)(6) requires "The projected demand for necessary public services or facility expansions required by new service units for a period not to exceed ten years " The projected need for additional lane miles and signalized intersections is a function of the ten-year development forecast (see City of Apache Junction Land Use Assumptions) and the existing infrastructure standards discussed above As shown in the figures above, trip generation rates and trip adjustment factors convert projected development into average weekday vehicle trips A typical vehicle trip, such as a person leaving a home and traveling to work, generally begins on a local street that connects to a collector street, which connects to an arterial road and eventually to a state or interstate highway. For the purpose of development fees, this progression of travel up and down the functional classification chain narrows the average trip length determination to the following question, "what is the average vehicle trip length of the streets development fee system improvements (i e,the same type of streets used to document current infrastructure standards)?" Minor Arterials In 2006, the City of Apache Junction executed an intergovernmental agreement between the City and Pinal County concerning shared costs for the reconstruction and redesign of Ironwood Drive within the City limits of Apache Junction. The agreement defined the responsibilities and financial obligations of the City for its proportionate share of the project costs to improve and expand a 2 2 mile segment of the minor arterial Ironwood Drive, between Elliott Avenue and U S 60. The complete project involved improvements to the existing roadway including new payment, curb and gutters, drainage facilities, sidewalks,street lighting, and a center median, and increasing capacity by adding two new lanes Only a portion of the total project included capacity improvements; additionally, the capacity improvements were designed with excess capacity to absorb growth into the future 56 Taschler ise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona As new development occurs in the City of Apache Junction over the next ten years it will buy into its share of the Ironwood Dr expansion by paying a growth share of the total project cost The steps taken to calculate the portion of the total project cost that funded the 4 4 lane miles of capacity improvements,the projected net new VMT in the next ten years,the cost per net new demand unit, and the cost per development unit are shown below. Figure 45.Cost Recovery-Minor Arterials Step 1-Cost of Capacity Improvements Cost per Lane Added Lane Cost of Capacity Mile Miles [1] Improvements $1,214,286 X 4.40 = $5,342,858 Step 2-10-Year Projected Growth in VMT on Arterials VMT in 2023 VMT in 2013 Net New VMT 1,091,256 - 926,463 = 164,793 Step 3-Cost per Demand Unit Cost of Capacity Net New Component Demand Improvements VMT Cost Unit $5,342,858 - 164,793 = $32.42 per VMT Step 4 Cost per Development Unit Per Vehicle Streets Level Of Service and Capital Costs Mile Traveled Arte ri a I Cos is $32.42 GROSS CAPITAL COST S32.42 Jou. Arterial Street Facilities Residential Development Fee Schedule VMT= (Al (B1 [Cl (DI (A]X(B1 x(cl x(DI Weekday Trip Rate Avg Miles I Trip Length Cost Arterial Component Vehicle Adjustment per Veh.Trip Weighting Per Proposed Development Trip Ends* Factors* on System* Factors* VMT VMT Fee Unit Type (Per Housing Unit) Single Unit 5.6 64% 7.92 121% 34.33 X $32.42 = $1,113 Single Unit Manufactured 47 64% 792 121% 29.03 X $32.42 = $941 2+Unit 4.4 64% 792 121% 26.97 X $32.42 = $875 Arterial Street Facilities Nonresidential Development Fee Schedule Weekday Trip Rate Avg Miles Trip Length Cost Arterial Component Vehicle Adjustment per Veh.Trip Weighting Per Proposed Development Fee Tri•Ends* Factors* on System* Factors* VMT(El VMT IFi [EJX(F1/1,000 (Per 1,000 sq.ft.) (Per Square Foot of Floor Area) Commercial 4270 33% 792 66% 73.62 X $32.42 = $2.39 Office 11.03 50% 792 73% 31.87 X $32.42 = $1.03 Industrial 6.97 50% 792 73% 20.14 X $32.42 = $0.65 [1]City of Apache Junction,Public Works Dept *See Figure 37.Existing Level of Service-City Minor Arterials Collectors As discussed above, existing development in Apache Junction generated 279,757 vehicle miles of travel on the existing 37.30 lane miles of collectors, which equates to a level of service of 133 lane miles per 10,000 VMT The demand model below shows that if the current level of service is maintained, and new development between 2013 and 2023 occurs as projected (see the Land Use Assumptions),vehicle miles of travel on collector roadways will increase by 49,761. This net increase will generate demand for an additional 6 63 lane miles to maintain the current level of service 57 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure 46:Incremental Expansion-Collectors 5 year increment-> Year> Base Yr 1 2 3 4 5 10 10-Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Increase DEMAND DATA[1] SINGLE UNIT RES 21,199 21,402 21,628 21,875 22,148 22,444 24,333 3,134 MULTI-UNIT RES 1,904 1,922 1,942 1,965 1,989 2,016 2,185 281 COMMERCIAL KSF 1,117 1,148 1,180 1,213 1,247 1,282 1,472 355 OFFICE KSF 1,823 1,881 1,941 2,003 2,067 2,132 2,494 671 INDUSTRIAL KSF 348 357 367 377 386 397 453 105 SINGLE UNIT TRI PS 75,977 76 704 77,513 78,401 79 378 80,440 87,208 MULTI UNIT TRIPS 5,362 5,413 5,470 5,533 5,602 5,677 6,154 RES TRIPS 81,339 82,117 82,983 83,934 84,979 86,116 93,362 12,023 COMMERCIAL TRIPS 15,733 16,169 16,627 17,092 17 571 18,058 20,735 OFFICE TRIPS 10,055 10,375 10,705 11,046 11,398 11,759 13,753 INDUSTRIAL TRIPS 1,213 1,244 1,277 1,312 1,347 1,383 1,578 NONRES TRIPS 27,000 27,789 28,610 29,450 30,316 31,200 36,066 9,066 TOTAL TRIPS 108,339 109,906 111,593 113,384 115,295 117,317 129,428 21,089 TOTAL VMT[2] 279,757 283,311 287,173 291,311 295,766 300,517 329,518, 49,761 Lane Miles[3] 37.30 3777 38.29 38.84 39.44 40.07 43.94 Annual Lane Mile Increase 0.47 0.51 0.55 0.59 0.63 0.87 Cost per CUMULATIVE Lane Miles 0.47 0.99 1.54 2.13 2.77 6.13 Netinaease Annual Ca.aci Cost millions $0.35 $0.38 $0.41 $0.44 $0.47 $0.64 in VMT•, CUMULATIVE Capacity Cost(millions) $0.35 $0.73 $1 14 $1.58 $2.04 $490 $ 98.40 Source TischlerBise [1]Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [2]See Figure 38 Existing Level of Service-City Collectors [3]See Figure 32 City-Maintained Street Facilities Inventory The projected demand for 6 63 lane miles equates to a total investment of$4 90 million, based on a cost per lane mile of$737,998 (see Figure 40) The formula to calculate a cost per net increase in VMT for the collectors component is calculated as follows (6 63 lane miles X $737,998 cost per collector lane mile)/49,761 net new VMT= $98.40 per VMT The steps to calculate the collector fee component per type of development unit based on a cost per VMT of$98 40 are shown below Figure 47.Cost per Development Unit-Collectors Per Vehicle Streets Level Of Service and Capital Costs Mile Traveled Collector Costs $98.40 (GROSS CAPITAL COST $98.401 Street Facilities Residential Development Fee Schedule VMT= [A] (e] [C] [D] [A]x[B]x[C]x[D] Weekday Trip Rate Avg Miles Trip Length Cost Collector Component':, Vehicle Adjustment per Veh Trip Weighting Per Proposed Development Trip Ends* Factors* on System• Factors' VMT VMT .. tee Unit Type (Per Housing Unit) Single Unit 5.6 64% _ 2.39 121% 10.37 X $98.40 = $1,020 Single Unit Manufactured 47 64% 2.39 121% 8.77 X $98.40 = $863 2+Unit 4.4 64% 2.39 121% 8.15 X $98.40 = $801 Street Facilities Nonresidential Development Fee Schedule Weekday Trip Rate Avg Miles Trip Length Cost Collector Component Vehicle Adjustment per Veh.Trip Weighting Per Proposed Development Fee TH.Ends• Factors* on System Factors' VMT(El VMT[F] (EJX(FJ/1,000. (Per 1,000 sq.ft.) 'Commercial 4270 33% 2.39 66% 22.23 X $98.40 = $2.19 Office 11.03 50% 2.39 73% 9.62 X $98.40 = $0.95 Industrial 6.97 50% 2.39 73% 6.08 X $98.40 = $0.60 *See Figure 38 Existing Level of Service-City Collectors 58 Tischler$ise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Signalized Intersections As discussed above, existing development in Apache Junction generated 1,207,852 vehicle miles of travel on the existing 143 79 lane miles of street facilities, which equates to a level of service of 0 15 signalized intersections per 10,000 VMT. The demand model below shows that if the current level of service is maintained, and new development between 2013 and 2023 occurs as projected (see the Land Use Assumptions), vehicle miles of travel on the full Street facilities network will increase by 214,845. This net increase will generate demand for an additional three signalized intersections to maintain the current level of service. Figure 48• Incremental Expansion-Signalized Intersections 5-year increment--> Year> Base Yr 1 2 3 4 5 10 10-Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Increase DEMAND DATA[1] SINGLE UNIT RES 21,199 21,402 21,628 21,875 22,148 22,444 24,333 3,134 MULTI-UNIT RES 1,904 1,922 1,942 1,965 1,989 2,016 2,185 281 COMMERCIAL KSF 1,117 1,148 1,180 1,213 1,247 1,282 1,472 355 OFFICE KSF 1,823 1,881 1,941 2,003 2,067 2,132 2,494 671 INDUSTRIAL KSF 348 357 367 377 386 397 ..453 105 SINGLE UNIT TRIPS 75,977 76704 77,513 78,401 79,378 80,440 87,208 - MULTI-UNIT TRIPS 5,362 5,413 5,470 5,533 5,602 5,677 6,154 RES TRIPS 81,339 82,117 82,983 83,934 84,979 86,116 93,362 12,023 COMMERCIAL TRIPS 15,733 16,169 16,627 17,092 17,571 18,058 20,735 `� OFFICE TRIPS 10,055 10,375 10,705 11,046 11,398 11,759 13,753 INDUSTRIAL TRIPS 1,213 1,244 1,277 1,312 1,347 1,383 1,578 NONRESTRIPS 27,000 27,789 28,610 29,450 30,316 31,200 36,066 9,066 TOTAL TRIPS 108,339 109,906 111,593 113,384 115,295 117,317 129,428 21,089 TOTAL VMT[2] 1,207,852 1,223,197 1,239,872 1,257,737 1,276,972 1,297,485 1,422,697 214,845 Signalized Intersections[4] 18 18 19 19 19 19 21 Cost per Annual Intersection Increase 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 Net increase CUMULATIVE 58naIized Intersection 0 1 1 1 1 3 in VMT* Annual Intersection Cost(mill ions $0.00 $0.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CUMULATIVE Capacity Cost(millions) $0.00 $0.12 $0.12 $0.12 $0 12 $0.36 $ 1.68 Source.TischlerBise [1] Development Fee Land Use Assumptions [2]See Figure 39.Existing Level of Service-Signalized Intersections [3]See Figure 32.City-Maintained Street Facilities Inventory 59 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona According to the City of Apache Junction Department of Public Works, the average cost to construct a signalized intersection is $120,000 Based on the demand model the City will need to construct three new signalized intersections in the next ten years. This equates to a total investment of$360,000 The cost per net increase in VMT for signalized intersections is calculated as follows. (3 intersections X $120,000)/214,845 VMT= $1 68 per VMT The steps to calculate the collector fee component per type of development unit based on a cost per VMT of$1 68 are shown below Figure 49•Cost per Development Unit-Signalized Intersections Per Vehicle Streets Level Of Service and Capital Costs Mile Traveled Signalized Intersections 5168 GROSS CAPITAL COST $1.68 Street Facilities Residential Development Fee Schedule VMT= [A) (B] (C] [D] [A]x[B]x[C]x[D] Weekday Trip Rate Avg Miles Trip Length Cost Signalized Intersection Vehicle Adjustment per Veh.Trip Weighting Per Component Proposed Trip Ends* Factors* on System* Factors* VMr VMT Development Fee Unit Type (Per Housing Unit) ■ Single Unit 5.6 64% 10.32 121% 44.76 X $1.68 = $75 Single Unit Manufactured 47 64% 10.32 121% 3785 X $1.68 = $63 2+Unit 4.4 64% 10.32 121% 35.17 X $1.68 = $59 Street Facilities Nonresidential Development Fee Schedule Weekday Trip Rate Avg Miles Trip Length Cost Signalized Intersection I Vehicle Adjustment per Veh.Trip Weighting Per Pr4u.zcd Developme.v:/--ce ' Tri.Ends• Factors* on S stem Factors• VMT El VMT[F] [E]X[F]/1,000 (Per 1,000 sq.ft.) (Per Square Foot of Floor Area) Commercial 42.70 33% 10.32 66% 95.99 X $1.68 = $0.16 Office 11.03 50% 10.32 73% 41.55 X $1.68 = $0.07 /tr Industrial 6.97 50% 10.32 73% 26.26 X $1.68 = $0.04 *See Figure 39 Existing Level of Service—Signalized Intersections 60 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona STREET FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The May 2012 Final Report for the Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study identified and prioritized capacity improvements that will be necessary as development occurs in the Development Fee Study service area. The report prioritized the first set of possible improvements (short-term improvements) necessary to accommodate a population of 60,000 people Shown below is a list of Collector and Signalized Intersection capacity improvements identified as necessary to accommodate the projected growth in the City of Apache Junction over the next ten years Estimated project costs were provided by the City of Apache Junction and taken from the 2012 Study. As demand is generated for identified Street Facilities improvements, investments from this list will be made. For the effective period of this Development Fee Study, the City of Apache Junction does not plan to use development fee revenue on capacity improvements to new minor arterial roadways Figure 50:Necessary Streets Expansions Infrastructure Improvements Plans Improvements Added 10-Year Projects Capacity Total 16th Ave(Delaware to Cedar) 1 1 Lane Miles $ 835,400 16th Ave(Idaho to Winchester) 08 Lane Miles $ 554,135 Winchester Road(16th to Southern) 1.5 Lane Miles $ 1,108,269 16th Ave(Cedar to Meridian) 0.4 Lane Miles $ 277,067 Idaho Road(Roundup to Foothill) 1 5 Lane Miles $ 1,108,269 ..► Meridian Drive(Southern to Baseline) 2 0 Lane Miles $ 2,800,000 Intersection (Meridian Dr at Southern Ave) Intersection $ 2,710,000 Total $ 9,393,140 Source City of Apache Junction,Apache Junction Comprehensive Transportation Study Final Report May 2012 61 TischlerBise „r DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE STREET FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FEES Figure 51 provides a summary of the four cost component that make up the full Street Facilities development fee by type of development Figure 51 Proposed Street Facilities Development Fees8 Street Facilities Residential Development Fee Schedule (A] (B] [C] (D) [A]+(8]+[C]+(Di Development Fee per Housing Unit Fee Component Gross Required Offset I Development Fee Minor I Signalized I Dev.Fee Development Fee Revenue Credit Increase Arterials Collectors Intersections Study per unit [Piaceholderl f rirffirimaimed H Current(I] (Decrease) Unit Type rozi Single Unit $1,113 $1,020 $75 _ $13 $2,221 = '$2,221 I $6,323 ($4,102) Single Unit Manufactured $941 $863 $63 $13 $1,880 = $1,880 $3,297 ($1,417) 2+Unit $875 $801 $59 $10 $1,745 = $1,745 $4,440 ($2,695) alikk, Street Facilities Nonresidential Development Fee Schedule Development Fee per Square Foot of Floor Area Fee Component Gross Required Offset Development Fee Minor Signalized Dev Fee Development Fee Revenue Credit Increase Arterials Collectors Intersections Stu. .-rUnit [Placeholder] Proposed Current PI (Decrease) (Per 1,000 sq.ft.) Commercial $2.39 $2.19 $0.16 $0.02 $4.76 . = $4,76 $13.641 ($8.88) Office $1.03 $0.95 $0.07 $0.01 $2.06 = $2,06 $5.68 ($3.62) Industrial $0.65 $0.60 $0.04 $0.00 $1.30 = $1.30 $2.26 ($0.96) [2]Current Fee established in 2012 included categories for Commercial,and Office land uses based on square footage,the average is entered here 'See Figure 39 Existing Level of Service 8 The development fees presented herein are for informational purposes only The final maximum supportable development fees will be adjusted in accordance with the findings of the Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvements Plan review and adoption process Further adjustment will be made to reflect any necessary offset revenue credits as required by ARS 9-463.05(E)(7) liischlerBise 62 DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona CASH FLOW ANALYSIS The cash flow summary shown in Figure 52 provides an indication of the development fee revenue generated and expenditures necessary to meet the demand for growth-related street improvements The cash flow projections are based on the assumptions detailed in this chapter To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the development fee revenue and capital costs The summary provides an indication of the development fee revenue generated by projected new development, and capital expenditures incurred to expand Ironwood Drive, and that will be necessary incrementally expand the collector and signalized intersection Street facilities to maintain the current level of service Figure 52:Street Facilities Cash Flow Summary9 10-Year 1 2 3 4 5 10 Average Cumulative (Current$in thousands) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2023 Annual Total REVENUES TRANSPORTATION.Streets 8 Streets Fee:Single Unit Res $450 $501 $550 $605 $658 $968 5696 $6,960 9 Streets Fee-2+Unit $32 $35 $39 $43 $46 $68 $49 $491 10 Streets Fee Commercial $147 $155 $157 $162 $164 $190 $169 $1,688 11 Streets Fee-Office $120 $123 $127 $131 $135 $158 $138 $1,381 12 Streets Fee-Industrial $12 $12 $13 $13 $13 $15 $14 $136 Subtotal Transportation(Streets)Fees $761 $827 $886 $954 $1,017 $1,400 $1,066 $10,657 CAPITAL COSTS TRANSPORTATION.Streets Mi nor Artenal Costs $1,069 $1,069 $1,069 $1,069 $1,069 $1,069 $1,069 $10,686 Collector Costs $490 $490 $490 $490 $490 $490 $490 $4,896 Signalized Intersection Costs $0 $120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36 $360 UP and Development Fee Study $5 $5 $5 $6 $6 $0 $3 $27 Subtotal Streets Costs $1,563 $1,683 $1,564 $1,564 $1,564 $1,558 $1,597 $15,969 - CASH FLOW NET CASH FLOW(Impact Fees)- TRANSPORTATION Streets Current$in thousands Annual Surplus (or Deficit) ($802) ($856) ($677) ($610) ($547) ($158) ($531) Cumulative Surplus(or Deficit) ($802) ($1,658) ($2,335) ($2 945) ($3,492) ($5 312) ($5,312) Source TischlerBise;Land Use Assumptions 9 The cash flow is shown in rounded figures However,the analysis itself uses figures carried to their ultimate decimal places; therefore the sums and products generated in the analysis may not equal the sum or product if the reader replicates the calculation with the factors shown in the memo(due to the rounding of figures shown,not in the analysis.) 63 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Ink IIP AND DEVELOPMENT FEE REPORT COSTS The figure below displays each section of the IIP and Development Fee Study Each necessary public service is assigned a cost, followed by the proportion that is assessed against residential and nonresidential Then, it displays the increase in demand units, between 2013 and 2018, and finally the cost per demand unit to be assessed (Because development fees are updated at least every five years, the cost is assessed against the demand units for only 5 years ) Figure 53:IIP and Development Fee Report Parks and Recreation Development Fee Report Service Unit Residential Proportionate Share 100% Parks Consultant Fee $19,324 $19,324 Demand Unit Person Increase in Demand Unit 2013-2018 2,309 Cost per Demand Unit $8 37 Library Development Fee Report Service Unit Residential Proportionate Share 100% ..�► Library Consultant Fee $14,040 $14,040 Demand Unit Person Increase in Demand Unit 2013-2018` 2,309 Cost per Demand Unit $6.08 Police Development Fee Report Service Unit -Residential Nonresidential_- Proportionate Share 92% 8% Police Consultant Fee $16,154 $14,862 $1,292 Demand Unit Person Vehicle Trip Increase in Demand Unit 2013-2018 2,309 4,200 Cost per Demand Unit $6.44 $031 Streets Development Fee Report Service Unit Residential&Nonresidential Proportionate Share 100% Consultant Fee $26,722 $26,722 Demand Unit Vehicle Mile of Travel Increase in Demand Unit 2013-2018 89,633 Cost per Demand Unit $0.30 Source TischlerBise,Land Use Assumptions 64 lischler$ise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona REVENUE STRATEGY AND REQUIRED OFFSET ANALYSIS ARS 9-463.05(E)(7) requires. "A forecast of revenues generated by new service units other than development fees, which shall include estimated state-shared revenue, highway users revenue,federal revenue, ad valorem property taxes, construction contracting or similar excise taxes and the capital recovery portion of utility fees attributable to development based on the approved land use assumptions, and a plan to include these contributions in determining the extent of the burden imposed by the development as required in subsection B,paragraph 12 of this section." TischlerBise has projected on-going and one-time revenues based on the development projections in the Land Use Assumptions document, characteristics of new development, and the City's current revenue structure and rates The revenues included in this analysis and the applicable rates and calculation methodologies are shown in the figure below Figure 54•Revenue Assumptions, Rates,Calculation Methodologies fpiacehotderj Figure 55:Revenue Characteristics of New Development IIplaceholderl Figure 56:Forecast of Revenues Jplaceholder) lischlerBise 65 DRAFT—Development Fee Study �-► City of Apache Junction,Arizona APPENDIX A - LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) 9-463.05 (T)(6) requires the preparation of a Land Use Assumptions document,which shows. "projections of changes in land uses, densities, intensities and population for a specified service area over a period of at least ten years and pursuant to the General Plan of the municipality" TischlerBise prepared current demographic estimates and future development projections for both residential and nonresidential development that will be used in the Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) and calculation of the development fees Current demographic data estimates for 2013 are used in calculating levels-of-service (LOS) provided to existing development in the City of Apache Junction. Although long-range projections are necessary for planning infrastructure systems, a shorter time frame of five to ten years is critical for the development fee analysis. Arizona's Development Fee Act requires fees to be updated at least every five years and limits the IIP to a maximum of ten years. Therefore, the use of a very long-range "build-out" analysis is no longer acceptable for deriving development fees in Arizona municipalities Summary of Growth Indicators Development projections and growth rates are summarized in Figure A57.These projections will be used to estimate development fee revenue and to indicate the anticipated need for growth-related infrastructure However, development fee methodologies are designed to reduce sensitivity to accurate ... development projections in the determination of the proportionate share fee amounts If actual development is slower than projected, development fee revenues will also decline, but so will the need for growth-related infrastructure In contrast, if development is faster than anticipated, the City will receive an increase in development fee revenue, but will also need to accelerate capital improvements to keep pace with development Development projections are calculated through a three-step process First, TischlerBise used historic population, housing, and employment data from the U.S. Census Bureau, State of Arizona, and City of Apache Junction, to calculate base year 2013 estimates. Second, TischlerBise developed projected annual growth rates through discussions with staff, and examination of regional studies Finally, TischlerBise calculated 20-year projections for population, housing units,jobs, and nonresidential square footage for each year beyond the base year 2013. See Figure A57 below for a summary of the base year estimates and 20-year development projections TischlerBise 66 DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A57-Summary of Development Projections and Growth Rates Fore-Year lnnements=> Cumulative Avg.Ann. Base Yr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 Increase Increase 2013 2014 2013 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 2033 2013-2033 2013-2033 RJ370JN0ML DEVELOPMENT Housing Units Unit Mir Single Family 92% 21,199 21,402 21,628 21.875 22,148 22,444 22,766 23,115 23,492 23,897 24,333 26,411 28,432 7,233 362 Multifamily 8% 1,904 1,922 1,942 1,965 1,989 2416 2,045 2,076 2,110 2,146 2,185 2,372 2,554 650 32 TOTAL 23,103 23,324 23,570 23,840 24,137 24,460 24,811 25,191 25,602 26,043 26,518 28,783 30,986 7,343 390 NONRESL0EN77AL DEVELOPMENT Growth Nantes Floor Area(1,0005F) Commercial(1,000 SF) 500 1,117 1,148 1,180 1,213 1,247 1,282 1,318 1,355 1,393 1,432 1,472 1,689 1,939 823 41 0Rl1e/It385(1,000 SF) 301 1A23 1,881 1,941 2,003 2,067 2,131 2,200 2,270 2,342 2,417 2494 2,917 3,112 1,589 79 Ind8081al/F165(1,000 SF) 433 34S 957 367 377 386 397 408 419 429 441 453 516 589 241 12 TOTAL 3,2U 3,186 3,488 3,592 3,700 3,811 3,926 4,044 4,164 4,290 4,418 5,122 5,940 2,652 133 2013.2033 ANNUL NORMS(ON ranks) 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 27-28 32-33 Avg Annual Housing unit. 221 246 270 297 323 351 380 411 441 475 421 454 334 Nona Floor Art(1,0005F) 98 102 105 108 111 115 118 120 125 128 149 174 133 Source.City of Apache Junction,Tlsch13r81se Growth Projections 2013 2033 city of Apache Junction,AZ 35,000 30,000 --. 20,000- 15,003 10,000 5,000 0 . 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 -t-Housing Units -`-NOnres Sq Ft(1,000s) 67 liischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Current estimates and future projections of residential development are detailed in this section, including population and housing units by type Recent Residential Construction Development fees require an analysis of current levels of service For residential development, current levels of service are determined using estimates of population and housing units To estimate current housing units in the City of Apache Junction,TischlerBise obtained building permit information from the City This information is then used to determine a base year estimate of housing units Figure A58 shows residential building permit trends by number and types of housing units for the City of Apache Junction Figure A58—Residential Building Permits in the City of Apache Junction,2007-2012 200 175 `1—Single Family 150 —Ilk—Mobile Home 125 —0—Multifamily 100 Am* 75 50 25 ♦ 0 2007 •20♦08 2009 2010 2011 2012 Single Family 137 37 36 104 57 183 Mobile Home 112 86 39 27 17 63 Multifamily 8 0 0 0 0 88 Source.City of Apache Junction,Feb13,Building Permit Totals by Year Residential housing units, and building permit trends, by type are shown in Figure A59 below. To calculate total housing units, the distribution of 92 percent single family and 8 percent multifamily units was calculated from the 2011 U.S Census American Community Survey(ACS), 5-Year Estimates for Units in Structure This distribution was applied to the total number of units reported by the 2010 decennial census (22,564) to get 20,748 single family units (including mobile homes), and 1,816 multifamily units in the City of Apache Junction in 2010 68 Tischlerf3ise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A59—Residential Housing Units in the City of Apache Junction Building Permits(1) 2010* 2011* 2012* Total Average Single Family[2] 131 74 246 451 150 Multifamily[3] 0 0 88 88 29 Total 131 74 334 539 *Issued during calendar year 2010 Base Year 2013 Housing Units[4] Distribution[5] 2010 2011 2012 2013 DistributionA Single Family 92% 20,748 20,879 20,953 21,199 92% Multifamily 8% 1,816 1,816 1,816 1,904 8% Total 22,564 22,695 22,769 23,103 A Reflects the addition of issued permits [1]City of Apache Junction,(Feb13) Building Permits by Permit Type [2]Single Family includes detached,attached,and mobile homes [3] Multifamily includes structures with 2 or more units [4] U S Census Bureau,2010 Decennial Census DP1 [5] U S Census Bureau,2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Table B25024 To estimate 2011, 2012, and 2013 housing units, the building permits issued each year were added to the housing units, starting with the 2010 census count TischlerBise estimates the City of Apache Junction had 23,103 housing units at the start of base year 2013 The 2013 distribution of housing units AIN by type of structure remains unchanged from the 2010 distribution. Persons Per Housing Unit According to the U.S. Census Bureau, a household is a housing unit that is occupied by year-round residents. Development fees often use per capita standards and persons per housing unit (PPHU) or persons per household (PPH) to derive proportionate share fee amounts. When PPHU is used in the fee calculations, infrastructure standards are derived using year-round population When PPH is used in the fee calculations, the development fee methodology assumes a higher percentage of housing units will be occupied, thus requiring seasonal or peak population to be used when deriving infrastructure standards TischlerBise recommends that development fees for residential development in the City of Apache Junction be imposed according to the number of year-round residents per housing unit This methodology assumes some portion of the housing stock will be vacant during the course of a year According to the U S Census Bureau American Community Survey, the City of Apache Junction had a 2011 vacancy rate of 27 percent Persons per housing unit(PPHU) requires data on population in occupied units and the types of units by structure and bedroom count The 2010 census did not obtain detailed information using a "long-form" questionnaire Instead, the U.S. Census Bureau switched to a continuous monthly mailing of surveys, known as the American Community Survey (ACS), which has limitations due to sample-size constraints For example, data on detached housing units are now combined with attached single units (commonly known as townhouses) For development fees in Apache Junction, "single-family" residential units include detached (both stick-built and manufactured) and attached (commonly known as townhouses, which share a common sidewall, but are constructed on an individual parcel of land) The second residential category includes duplexes and all other structures with two or more units on an individual parcel of land. (Note housing unit estimates from ACS will not equal decennial census counts of units These data are used only to derive the custom PPHU factors for each type of unit) 69 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A60 below shows the ACS 2011 5-Year Estimates for the City of Apache Junction To calculate the PPHU, persons (33,770) is divided by housing units (19,845). Dwellings with a single unit per structure (detached, attached, and mobile homes)averaged 1.73 persons per housing unit. Dwellings in structures with multiple units averaged 139 persons per housing unit. The 2011 City of Apache Junction total persons per housing unit factor was 1 70 Figure A60—Persons per Housing Unity by Type of Housing Units in Renter&Owner Housing Persons Per Vacancy Structure Households Persons Units Hsg Unit Rate Single Family 6,600 18,870 7,776 2.43 15% Mobile Homes 6,720 12,688 10,472 1.21 36% 2+units 1,198 2,212 1,597 1.39 25% Total 14,518 33,770 19,845 5,327 2011 Summary by House- Housing Housing Type of Housing holds Persons Units PPHU Mix Single Family[1] 13,320 31,558 18,248 1.73 92% Multifamily[2] 1,198 2,212 1,597 1.39 8% Subtotal 14,518 33,770 19,845 1.70 Vacancy Group Quarters Population 139 Rate TOTAL* 14,518 33,909 19,845 26 8% Source• U S Census Bureau,2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates [1] Single Family includes detached,attached,and mobile homes [2] Multifamily includes duplex and all other units with 2 or more units per structure *Totals exclude units counted as "Boat,RV,van,etc" Population Estimates and Projections TischlerBise analyzed recent growth trends, reviewed the City of Apache Junction 2010 General Plan, and had discussions with staff. To calculate a 2013 year-round population, TischlerBise used annual Arizona Department of Administration Interim Intercensal July Population Estimates for 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 to establish a recent growth trend of 1 percent Based on these growth patterns and analysis conducted for the 2010 General Plan, the City of Apache Junction assumes there will be annual population growth However, due to the continual effects of a slow economic recovery annual growth is expected to be low, and to grow slowly over the next decade. Figure A61 presents a summary of the population estimates and projections for the City of Apache Junction a 70 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A61—Population Estimates and Projections for City of Apache Junction Annual July Population Estimates[2] Population Population Exponential Growth Estimate Projections[3] Rates 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2040 2009 12 2013-40 City of Apache Junction 35,833 35,828 36,539 36,928 37,300 56,472 101% 155% [1]U.S Census Bureau,2010 Decennial Census [2]Arizona Department of Administration,Interim Intercensal Population Estimates [3]2040 population projection from Arizona Department of Administration Pinal and Maricopa County 2012-2050 Population Projections Low Series Year 2030 Projection used to assume similar growth rate of recent years In December of 2012, the Arizona Department of Administration released County Population Projections, which assumed a low growth scenario for each County between 2012 and 2050 The City's sub-county share of Pinal and Maricopa County populations in 2012 were applied to the 2030 population projections for each county to estimate a 2030 City of Apache Junction population of 56,472 To add over 19,000 people between 2013 and 2030 would require annual residential building activity to double recent annual activity Based on discussions with City staff, it was determined the 2030 population projection more accurately reflects a thirty-year growth projection To reflect the longer- term projections, and slow growth in the short term, TischlerBise applied a progressive annual growth rate beginning in 2014 with a rate of 1 01 percent. Each year the growth rate is increased by 0 05 percent until a 1.55 percent plateau is reached in 2024 See Figure A62 for more detail Population and Housing Unit Projections TischlerBise used a two-step process to project housing units for each year past base year 2013 First,to calculate units added each year, the annual net population increase was divided by the PPHU factor (1.70) The total units estimate was then distributed by type of structure using the 2013 unit mix from Figure A59 above (92 percent single family and 8 percent multifamily) See Figure A62 below for a summary of population and housing unit projections. According to the 2010 General Plan, the City can absorb approximately 38,700 net new units using average/mid-range land use densities. At an average annual increase of 394 housing units, build-out of current City acreage will be met roughly in year 2048 The projected growth assumes that the estimated 2013 distribution between single family and multifamily units is held constant. Population and housing unit projections are used to illustrate the possible future pace of service demands, revenues, and expenditures As these factors will vary to the extent that future development varies,there will be virtually no effect on the actual amount of the development fee 71 TischlerBise Aar DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A62-Population and Housing Unit Projections for the City of Apache Junction,2013-2033 Persons Pet Housing Unit 1.70 Population Projected Rate 1.01% 1.06% 1.11% 1.16% 1.21% 1.26% 1.31% 1.36% 1.41% 1.46% 1.55% Cumulative -Avg.Ann. Base Yr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 20 increase Increase 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2033 2013-2033 2013-2033 SUMMARY OF DEMAND PROJECTIONS(City Limits) TOTAL YEAR-ROUND POPULATION 37,300 37,676 38,094 38,554 39,059 39,609 40,206 40,853 41,552 42,303 43,111 44,166 50,715 13,415 671 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 23,103 23,324 23,570 23,843 24,137 24,460 24,811 25,191 25,602 26543 26,518 27,138 30,986 7,883 394 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Housing Units - - Unit Mix -- Single Family 92% 21,199 21,402 21,428 -21,875 22,148 22,444 22,766 23,115 23,492 23,897 24,333 24,901 28,432 7,233 362 Multifamily .. 8% 1,904 1,922 1,942 1,965 1,989 '2,016 2,045 2,076 2,110 2,146 2,185 2,237 2,554 650 32 _ TOTAL 23,103 23,324 23,570 23,840 24,137 24,460 24,811 25,191 25,602 26,043 26,518 27,138 30,986 7,883 394 2013-2033 ANNWL INCREASES ICltylaRs) 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 32-33 Avg Annual Housing Units 221 246 270 297 323 351 380 411 441 475 620 454 394 Source:City of Apache Junction Tischleraise AMIN TischlerBise 72 DRAFT-Development Fee Study ...► City of Apache Junction,Arizona NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Employment Estimates and Projections In addition to data on residential development, the calculation of development fees requires data on nonresidential square footage and employment(number of jobs) in the City of Apache Junction TischlerBise analyzed recent employment trends, reviewed data provided by the City of Apache Junction, and had discussions with staff According to an analysis conducted for the Apache Junction 2010 General Plan,the City expects to increases the jobs to population ratio from a 1.4 ratio in 2010 to a 1 3 ratio in 2030. TischlerBise used a six-step process to calculate a base year job estimate and projections for each year past the base. First, historic job estimates produced by the U.S. Census Bureau LEHD Program for City of Apache Junction were used to calculate a recent job growth rate of 2.03 percent Second, the growth rate was used to estimate employment for 2011-2013. TischlerBise estimates the City of Apache Junction had 9,093 jobs for the base year of 2013. The 2030 job projection presented in the 2010 General Plan was discussed with staff to determine it more accurately reflects a 30-year projection. Third, to calculate jobs projections for each year past the base, the City of Apache 2010 General Plan data was used to calculate the projected jobs to population ratio of 1.3. Fourth, the ratio was applied to the 2040 population projection of 56,472 to calculate a 2040 job projection of 20,453. Fifth, the 2013 employment estimate was used in conjunction with the 2040 employment projection to calculate a long-term growth rate of 3 05 percent. Lastly, 3 05 percent was applied to each projection year past the base Figure A63—Employment Trends in City of Apache Junction City of Apache Junction Employment Estimates Employment Exponential Growth Estimates[1] Projections[2] Rates 2004 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2040 2004-10 2013-40 City of Apache Junction 7,589 8,709 8,561 8,735 8,912 9,093 20,453 2 03% 3 05% [1]U S.Census Bureau LEND web-based application OnTheMap, "all jobs"2004-2010 (2)2010 Apache Junction General Plan,2030 job to population ratio(0 36)applied to 2040 population projection; Apache Junction Market Area adjusted to remove Gold Canyon Employment by Industry Type In addition to projecting total employment, as part of the City of Apache Junction 2010 General Plan Update process,the City analyzed employment trends and set economic development priorities for the future City staff made three assumptions to project employment distribution. First,there will be employment growth.Second,the City will actively recruit a diverse set of target industries Third, office/institutional jobs will grow at a faster rate(3.18%)than commercial/retail jobs(2.80%)and industrial/flex jobs(2.67%). Between 2013 and 2033 the City of Apache Junction expects to add over 7,479 jobs. Figure A64 shows the incremental shift in employment distribution to increase the share of office/institutional jobs to the projected total employment for City of Apache Junction TischlerBise 73 DRAFT—Development Fee Study "` City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A64—Employment Distribution by Industry Type City of Apache Junction City of Apache Junction Employment Estimates Estimates[1] Projections[2] 2010 2010 Share 2013 2013 Share 2033 Growth Rate Commercial/Retail 2,102 25% 2,233 25% 3,878 2 80% Office/Institutional 5,703 67% 6,057 67% 11,334 3.18% Industrial/Flex 756 9% 803 9% 1,360 2.67% TOTAL 8,561 100% 9,093 100% 16,572 3.05% [1]U S Census Bureau LEND web-based application OnTheMap, "alI jobs"2010 [2]City of Apache Junction,2010 General Plan adjusted for 30-year projections Nonresidential Square Footage Development Job estimates are used to estimate nonresidential square footage based on nationally recognized average square feet per employee data published by The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and shown in Figure A65 below Figure A65—The Institute of Transportation Engineers, Employee and Building Area Ratios,2012 ITE Land Use/Size Demand Weekday Trip Ends per Emp Per Sq Ft Code Unit Demand Unit* Employee* Dmd Unit** Per Emp Commercial/Shopping Center 820 Average 1,000 Sq Ft 42.70 na 2.00 500 +.. General Office 710 Average 1,000 Sq Ft 11.03 3.32 3.32 301 Other Nonresidential 770 Business Park*** 1,000 Sq Ft 12.44 4 04 3 08 325 760 Research&Dev Center 1,000 Sq Ft 8 11 2 77 2.93 342 610 Hospital 1,000 Sq Ft 13 22 4 50 2 94 340 565 Day Care student 4 38 26.73 0 16 na 550 University/College student 1 71 8 96 0 19 na 530 High School student 1.71 19 74 0.09 na 520 Elementary School student 1 29 15 71 0 08 na 520 Elementary School 1,000 Sq Ft 15 43 15 71 0 98 1,018 320 Lodging room 5 63 12.81 0 44 na 254 Assisted Living bed 2 66 3.93 0 68 na 151 MI ni-Warehouse 1,000 Sq Ft 2 50 61 90 0 04 24,760 150 Warehousing 1,000 Sq Ft 3.56 3 89 0.92 1,093 140 Manufacturing 1,000 Sq Ft 3.82 213 1.79 558 110 Light Industrial 1,000 Sq Ft 6.97 3.02 2.31 433 * Trip Generation,Institute of Transportation Engineers,9th Edition(2012) ** Employees per demand unit calculated from trip rates,except for Shopping Center data,which are derived from Development Handbook and Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers,published by the Urban Land Institute TischlerBise used 2012 data from the ITE to calculate the total nonresidential floor areas for three categories of development used in the calculation of development fees To estimate current nonresidential floor area, 2013 job estimates by category were multiplied by ITE square feet per "" employee factors. It is estimated the City of Apache Junction has over 3 million square feet of 74 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona nonresidential space in active use Figure A66 shows the estimated square footage in 2013 for each major category of nonresidential development. Figure A66—Estimated Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area in City of Apache Junction,2013 2010 City of Apache Junction[1] Square Feet 2013 Nonresidential Pct of Nonres Total Jobs Per Employee[2] Estd Jobs Floor Area Floor Area Commercial/Retail 2,102 25% 500 2,233 1,116,500 34% Office/Institutional 5,703 67% 301 6,057 1,823,141 55% Industrial/Flex 756 9% 433 803 347,928 11% TOTAL 8,561 100% 362 9,093 3,287,569 100% [1]U S Census Bureau LEHD web-based application OnTheMap, "all jobs" [21 Trip Generation Manual,Institute of Transportation Engineers,9th Edition(2012) Nonresidential Floor Area and Employment Projections Future employment growth and nonresidential development in the City of Apache Junction are projected based on information provided by City staff, and analysis of past trends in the City To project employment for the City of Apache Junction,TischlerBise applied an annual growth rate of 3.05 percent for each year beyond the base year 2013 estimate of 9,093 jobs The projected increase in employment was then used to project growth in nonresidential square footage using the Square Footage per Employee factors previously discussed. Results are shown in Figure A67. The City expects to add on average 374 jobs a year for the next twenty years To keep pace with employment growth, the City should expect to add roughly 133,000 square feet of active nonresidential development each year. 75 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A67-Nonresidential Floor Area and Employment Projections in City of Apache Junction,2013-2033 Employment Projec3ons 3.05% FiveYear Increment==> Cumulative Avg.Ann. Base Yr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 Increase Increase 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020. 2021 2022 2023 2028 2033 2013.2033 2013-2033 SUMMARY OF DEMAND PROJECTIONS(City Llmitsf TOTAL1013.9 9,093 9,369 9,655 9,949 10,252 10,563 10,886 11,217 11,558 11,911 12,273 14,261 16,572 7,479 374 NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOP/ENT Growth Employment By Typo Rob Com09er0181/Ret4il 2.8% 2,233 2,295 2,360 2,426 2,494 2,563 2,635 2,709 2,785 2,863 2,943 3,378 3,878 1,645 82 Office/Institutional 3.2% 6,057 6,250 6,449 6,654 6,866 7,084 7,310 7,542 7782 8,030 8,285 9,691 11,334 5,277 264 Industrial/Fl9, 2.7% 803 824 846 869 892 916 941 966 991 1,018 1,045 1,192 1,360 557 28 TOTAL 9,093 9,369 9,655 9,949 10,252 10.563.. 10.886 11,217 11,558 11,911. 12,273 14,261 16,572 7,479 374 Names Floor Area(1,O0O 5F) Commercial(1,O0O SF) 500 1,117 1,148 1,180 1,213 1,247 1,282 1,318 1,355 1993 1,432 I,472 1,689- . 1,939 823 41 Offlce/Ins81(1,000 SF) 301 1,823 1,881 1,941 2,003 2,067 2,132 2,200 2,270 2,342 2,417 2,494 2,917 3,412 1,589 79 Indus5ial/Fla(1,000SF) 433 348 357 367 377 386 397 408 419 429 441 453 516 589 241 12 TOTAL 3,288 3,386 3,488 3,592 3,700 3,811 3,926 4,044 4,164 4,290 4,418 5,122 5,940 2,652 133 2013-2033 ANNEAL NCRFATES(CityLimits) 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 27-28 32-33 Avg Annual lobs 276 286 294 303 311 323 331 341 353 362 422 491 374 Nonres Floor Area(1,O0O SF) 98 102 105 108 111 115 118 120 125 128 149 174 133 Source:City of Ape cheJunction,Tlschleralse 76 TischlerBise eN DRAFT—Development Fee Study ... City of Apache Junction,Arizona AVERAGE DAILY VEHICLE TRIPS Average Daily Vehicle Trips are used for the Streets development fee category as a measure of demand by land use. Vehicle trips are estimated using average weekday vehicle trip ends from the reference book, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in 2012. A vehicle trip end represents a vehicle either entering or exiting a development (as if a traffic counter were placed across a driveway) Trip Rate Adjustments Trip generation rates are adjusted to avoid double counting each trip at both the origin and destination points. Therefore, the basic trip adjustment factor is 50 percent As discussed below, additional adjustments are made to ensure the fees are proportionate to the infrastructure demand for particular types of development Adjustment for Journey-To-Work Commuting Residential development in the City of Apache Junction has a larger trip adjustment factor of 64 percent to account for commuters leaving Apache Junction for work-According to the National Household Travel Survey (2009), home-based work trips are typically 31 percent of"production"trips, in other words, out- bound trips (which are 50 percent of all trip ends) Data from the LEHD for 2010 indicate that 90 percent of Apache Junction's employed residents travel outside the City for work In combination, these factors (0.31 x 0 50 x 0 90 = 0 14) account for 14 percent of additional production trips The total adjustment factor for residential includes attraction trips (50% of trip ends) plus the journey-to-work commuting adjustment for a total of 64 percent. Figure A68—Adjustment for Journey-To-Work Commuting Trip Adjustment Factor for Commuters(1 j Employed Residents 12,031 Residents Working in City 1,236 Residents Commuting Outside City for Work 10,795 Percent Commuting out of the City 90% Additional Production Trips [2] 14% Residential Trip Adjustment Factor 64% [1]U S Census Bureau,2010 OnTheMap Application(version 6 1 1)and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics [2]National Household Travel Survey,2009 Table 30 Adjustment for Pass-By Trips The basic trip adjustment factor of 50 percent is applied to the office/institutional, and industrial/flex categories. The commercial/retail category has a trip factor of less than 50 percent because this type of development attracts vehicles as they pass-by on arterial and collector roads. For an average size shopping center, the ITE (2012) indicates that on average 34 percent of the vehicles that enter are .�. passing by on their way to some other primary destination The remaining 66 percent of attraction trips have the shopping center as their primary destination. 77 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Estimated Vehicle Trips in Apache Junction As an alternative to simply using the national average trip generation rate for residential development, the ITE publishes regression curve formulas that may be used to derive custom trip generation rates using local demographic data. Key independent variables needed for the analysis (i e vehicles available, housing units, households, and persons) are only available collectively from the 2011 ACS 5-Year Estimates for Apache Junction. (Note: data from the ACS will not equal decennial census counts. These data are used only to derive the custom average weekday vehicle trip ends by type of housing unit, as shown below) Figure A69-Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends by Housing Type in City of Apache Junction City of Apache Junction,AZ Households[2] Vehicles per Vehicles Units Household Available[1] Single Family Multifamily Total by Tenure Owner-occupied 18,863 11,363 156 11,519 164 Renter-occupied 3,666 1,957 1,042 2,999 122 TOTAL 22,529 13,320 1,198 14,518 1.55 Housing Units[3]=> 18,248 1,597 19,845 Persons per Housing Unit=> 1 73 1.39 [1]Vehicles available bytenure from Table B25046,American CommunitySurvey,2011 [2]Households by tenure and units in structure from Table 925032. American Community Survey,2011. [3]Housing units from Table B2S024,American CommunitySurvey,2011.21 Persons in Trip Vehicles by Trip Average Trip Ends per ITE Trip Ends Difference r'► Hholds[4] Ends[5] Type of Housing Ends[6] Trip Ends Housing Unit Per Unit from ITE single Family Units 31,558 81,723 21,000 121,320 101,521 560 9.52 -41% Multifamily Units 2,212 7,611 1,529 6,319 6,965 4.40 6.65 -34% TOTAL 33,770 89,334 22,529 127,638 108,486 5.50 [4]Total population in households from Table25033,American CommunitySurvey,2011 [5]Vehicle trips ends based on persons using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2012) For single family housing(ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.91'LN(persons)+1.52) To approximate the average population of the ITE studies persons were divided by57and the equation result multiplied by 57 For multifamily housing(ITE 220),the fitted curve equation is(3.47'persons)64.48 [6]Vehicle trip ends based on vehicles available using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2012) For single family housing(ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.99'LN(vehicles)+1.81) To approximate the average number of vehicles in the ITE studies,vehicles available were divided by77 and the equation result multiplied by77 For multifamily housing(ITE 220),the fitted curve equation is(3.94'vehicles)+293.58 As shown, a single family unit has an average daily trip rate of 5 60 per unit (compared to 9 52 from ITE), and a multifamily unit has an average daily trip rate of 4.40 trips per unit (compared to 6 65 per unit from ITE).Average daily trips are derived using these data Figure A70 details the calculations to determine that existing development, in the City, generates an average of 108,339 vehicle trips on a typical weekday Residential development is estimated to generate 81,339 vehicle trips (75 percent) compared to 27,000 vehicle trips (25 percent) generated by nonresidential development An example of the calculation is as follows for single family units: 21,199 single family units x 5 60 vehicle trips per day per unit x 64 percent adjustment factor = 75,977 total vehicle trips per day from single family units in the City The same calculation is done for each land use type. 78 lischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A70—Average Daily Trips from Existing Development in City of Apache Junction Base Year Residential Vehicle Trips on an Average Weekday* 2013 Residential Units Assumptions Single Family 21,199 Multifamily 1,904 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends per Unit* Trip Rate Trip Factor Single Family 5 60 64% Multifamily 4.40 64% Residential Vehicle Trip Ends of an Average Weekday Single Family 75,977 Multifamily 5,362 %of total Total Residential Trips 81,339 75% Nonresidential Vehicle Trips on an Average Weekday** 2013 Nonresidential Gross Floor Area(1,000 sq ft.) Assumptions Commercial/Retail 1,117 Office/Institutional 1,823 Industrial/Flex 348 Average Weekday Vehicle Trips Ends per 1,000 Sq Ft** Trip Rate Trip Factor Commercial 42.70 33% Office/Institutional 1103 50% Industrial/Flex 6 97 50% Nonresidential Vehicle Trips on an Average Weekday Commercial 15,733 Office/Institutional 10,055 Industrial/Flex 1,213 Total Nonresidential Trips 27,000 25% TOTAL TRIPS 108,339 100% *Trip rates are customized for City of Apache Junction.See accompanying tables and discussion **Trip rates are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Manual(2012) Demand Indicators by Size of Detached Housing As part of the development fee effort for the City of Apache Junction, TischlerBise further analyzed demographic data to present the option to refine the development fee schedule to be more progressive for residential development. This can be done by developing fees by size of housing unit, based on bedroom count. Household size and vehicle trip rates can be derived using custom tabulations of demographic data by bedroom range from survey responses provided by the U S Census Bureau in files know as Public Use Micro-data Samples (PUMS) Because PUMS data are only available for areas of roughly 100,000 persons, the City of Apache Junction is in Arizona Public Use Micro-data Area (PUMA) 0800. Data are first analyzed for the PUMA area, and then calibrated to conditions in the City of Apache Junction. TischlerBise used AZ PUMA 0800 2011 ACS 1-Year Estimates to derive persons per housing unit by number of bedrooms as well as number of vehicle trips per unit by number of bedrooms As shown in Figure A71,TischlerBise derived trip generation rates and average persons, by bedroom range, using the 79 TischlerBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study �•. City of Apache Junction,Arizona number of persons and vehicles available Recommended multipliers were scaled to make the average value by type of housing for Arizona PUMA 0800 match the average value derived from ACS data specific to Apache Junction. As the number of bedrooms increases, trip ends and persons per housing unit increase as well Figure A71—Average Persons and Trip Ends by Bedroom Range in City of Apache Junction Recommended Multipliers for Municipality(4) Persons Trip Vehicles Trip Average Housing Trip Ends per Persons per (1] Ends(2) Available(1) Ends(3) Trip Ends Units(1] Housing Unit Housing Unit Single Family0-3 Bdrms 1,684 4,560 1,225 7109 5,834 974 4.93 1.48 Single Family 4+Bdrms 818 2,364 495 2,899 2,631 267 8.05 2.63 Single Family Subtotal 2,502 7293 1,720 10,066 8,680 1,241 5.60 173 Multifamily Total 110 317 39 447 382 63 4.40 1.39 GRAND TOTAL 2,612 7,610 1,759 10,514 9,062 1,304 [1]American Community Survey,Public Use Microdata Sample for AZ PUMA 0800(unweighted data for 2011) [2]Vehicle trips ends based on persons using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2012) For single family housing(ITE 210) the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.91*LN(persons)+1.52) To approximate the average population in the ITE studies persons were divided by5 and the equation result multiplied by5 For multifamily housing(ITE 220) the fitted curve equation is(3.47*persons)64.48 [3]Vehicle trip ends based on vehicles available using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2012) For single family housing(ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.99*LN(vehicles)+1.81) To approximate the average number of vehicles in the ITE studies,vehicles available were divided by 7 and the equation result multiplied by 7 For muliifamily housing(ITE 220),the fitted curve equation is(3.94*vehicles)+293.58 [4]Recommended multipliers are scaled to make the average value by type of housing for AZ PUMA 0800 match the average value for Apache Junction,derived from American Community Survey 2011 data with persons adjusted to the Citywide average of 173 persons per single family housing unit. SUMMARY Provided on the next page is a summary of annual demographic and development projections to be used for the development fee study. Base year estimates for 2013 are used In the development fee calculations. Development projections are used to illustrate a possible future pace of service demands and cash flows resulting from revenues and expenditures associated with those service demands. 80 TischlerBise DRAFT-Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Figure A72-Land Use Assumptions Summary,City of Apache Junction Five-Year Increments=_> Cumulative Avg.Ann. Base Yr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 Increase Increase 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2028 2033 2013-2033 2013-2033 SUMMARY OF DEMAND PROJECTIONS(City Limits) TOTAL YEAR-ROUND POPULATION 37,300 37,676 38,094 38,554 39,059 39,609 40,206 40,853 41,552 42,303 43,111 46,965 50,715 13,415 671 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 23,103 23,324 23,570 23,840 24,137 24,460 24,811 25,191 25,602 26,043 26,518 28,783 30,986 7,883 394 TOTALJOBS 9,093 9,369 9,655 9,949 10,252 10,563 10,886 11,217 11,558 11,911 12,273 14,261 16,572 7.479 374 RESIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT Housing Units UARMYX Single Family 92% 21,199 21,402 21,628 21,875 22,148 22,444 22,766 23,115 23,492 23,897 24,333 26,411 28,432 7,233 362 Multifamily 8% 1,904 1,922 1,942 1,965 1,989 2,016 2,045 2,076 2,110 2,146 2,185 2,372 2,554 650 32 TOTAL 23,103 23,324 23,570 23,840 24,137 24,460 24,811 25,191 25,602 26,043 26,518 28,783 30,986 7,883 394 N0NRESIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT Growth Em ommernl al it 2.8% 2,233 2,295 2,360 2,426 2,494 2,563 2,635 2,709 i 2,,785 2,863 2,943� 3,378 3,878 1b45 - 82 Office/Institutional 3.2% 6,057 6,250 6,449 6,654 6,866 7,084 7,310 7,542 7782 8,030 8,285 9,691 11,334 5,277 264 Industrial/Fla 2.7% 803 824 846 869 892 916 941 966 991 1,018 1,045 1,192 1,360 557 28 TOTAL 9,093 9,369 9,655 9,949 10,252 10,563 10,886 11,217 11,558 11,911 12,273 14,261 16,572 7,479 374 Nonres Floor Area 11,000 SF) Commercial(1,000 SF) 500 1,117 1,148 1,180 1,213 1,247 1,282 1,318 1,355 1,393 1,432 1,472 1,689 1,939 823 41 , t 0ffice/Instit)1,000 0F) 301 1,823 1,881 1,941 2,003 2,067 2,132 2,200 2,270 2,342 2,417 2,494 2,917 3,412 1,589 79 Ind6stri4l/Fl18(1,000 SF) 433 348 357 367 377 386 397 408 419 429 441 453 516 589 241 12 TOTAL 3,288 3,386 3,488 3,592 3,700 3,811 3,926 4,044 4,164 4,290 4R18 5,122 5,940 2,652 133 2013-2033 ANNUAL INCREASES(City Limits) 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 27-28 32-33 Avg Annual Year-6ound-Population 376 418 460 505 550 597 647 699 751 808 716 773- 671 Housing Units 221 246 270 297 323 351 380 411 441 475 421 454 394 Lobs 276 286 294 303 311 323 331 341 353 362 422 491 374 Nonres Floor Pres(1,000 SF) 98 102 105 108 111 115 118 120 125 128 149 174 133 Source:City of Apache Junction,TIschler8lse 81 TischletBise DRAFT—Development Fee Study City of Apache Junction,Arizona Growth Projections 2013-2033 City of Apache Junction,AZ 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 __.... _.... 20,000 10,000 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 seYear-8aund Population sill—Housing Units ^-x lobs —)is—Nonres 5q Ft(1,000s( 82 TISchlerBise �r r* ' -- City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300E Superstition f(y Boulevard Apache Junction,AZ 85119 = Agenda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item No 1 rl1 :1 File ID: 13-347 Sponsor. Brad Steinke Agenda Date. 11/18/2013 Index. In Control: City Council Work Session Presentation and discussion of the draft development fee land use assumptions, infrastructure improvement plan and project schedule Presentation and discussion. Attachments• Draft Development Fee Update City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 11/13/2013 ....... ...... •ACM c,... ono, City of Apache Junction ri- 4- o Ts Development Services Department To- Mayor and City Council From Brad Steinke, Director of Development Services Date. October 31, 2013 RE Presentation and Discussion of Development Fee Program Update Background. The City has hired consultant TichlerBise to update our development fee program and ordinance to be in compliance with recently changed state law The consultant has prepared their preliminary analysis and will present their initial findings at the November 19th Council work session meeting Additionally, the consultant has prepared the tentative schedule for the project's timeline for review and approval- November 18 or City Council Work Session on Land Use Assumptions and November 19, 2013 Infrastructure Improvement Plan November 20, 2013• City releases the Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan and provides notice of January 21, 2014, public hearing on the City website. November 20, 2013 Minimum 60 day comment period to January 18, 2013. January 21, 2014• City Council holds public hearing on Land Use Assumptions and /Mr Infrastructure Improvement Plan. January 22, 2014 Minimum 30 day comment period. To February 20, 2013 March 4, 2014 City Council adopts Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan. City releases the draft development fees and provides notice of April 15, 2014, public hearing on the development fees and the development fee ordinance update on the City website March 5 to Minimum 30 day comment period April 4, 2014- March 31, 2014. City Council work session on proposed development fees and development fee ordinance update 300 E Superstition Boulevard • Apache Junction,AZ 85119 • Ph (480)474-5082 • Fax(480)982-7010 Apnl 15, 2014• City Council public hearing on proposed development fees and development fee ordinance update April 16 to Minimum 30 day comment period May 15, 2014. May 20, 2014. City Council adopts new development fees and development fee ordinance update. May 21 to Minimum 75 day waiting period August 3, 2014- August 4, 2014. New development fees become effective Staff Recommendation This work session is for presentation and discussion purposes only. .r. 300 E Superstition Boulevard • Apache Junction,AZ 85119 • Ph (480)474-5082 • Fax(480)982-7010 Adak vspCHE J z City Apache A ache Junction A- 0%4 ' Development Services Department To Mayor and City Council From Brad Steinke, Director of Development Services Date November 19, 2013 RE Copy of Carson Bise Development Fee Presentation At the request of a council member, I'm providing all of you with a copy of Carson Bise's development fee presentation from the November 18a'meeting. If you have any questions,please call me at 480-474-5082. 300 E Superstition Boulevard • Apache Junction,AZ 85119 • Ph (480)474-5082 • Fax(480)982-7010 11/19/2013 Draft Land Use Assumptions, Infrastructure Improvements Plan, and Preliminary Development Fees City of Apache Junction, Arizona November 18,2013 TischlerBise Fiscal,Economic&Planning Cons,: r. Overview of Adoption Process Round 1 • Land Use Assumptions • Infrastructure Improvement Plans Round 2 Development Fees • Modify based on Round 1 input/decisions • Revenue projections • Required offsets • Development Fee Ordinance Effective by August 4, 2014 lischlerBise 2 1 11/19/2013 Key Changes to Enabling Legislation Three integrated products - Land Use Assumptions (at least 10 years and approved by elected officials) Infrastructure Improvements Plan (IIP) limited to 10 years (no build out analysis) Development Fees part of broader revenue strategy Based on same Level-Of-Service (LOS) provided to existing development Limitations on Necessary Public Services 3,000 square feet recreational facilities Parks limited to 30 acres Libraries limited to 10,000 square feet - No regional training facilities for public safety Refunds can be requested if improvements are not built lischler Development Fee Methods and Cost Components Co�.t itv�.ovrry Incremental Expansion Plan Based Type of Public Facility (Past) (Present) (Future) Libraries • Facilities _ Not Applicable Not Applicable • Developed Parkland • Park Improvements Parks and Recreation Not Applicable • Recreational Facilities Not Applicable • Multi Use Trails • Vehicles Police Not Applicable • Communications Equipment Not Applicable • City Collectors Streets • Minor Arterials • Signalized Intersections Not Applicable Taschler 2 11/19/2013 Demographic and Service Areas Population estimates and j projections from Arizona c• _. 1 Department of Administration, 1 as Conservative short-term projections TTS Converted population to housing units Jobs estimates from U S • Census Bureau,and I _ projections from 2010 City as General Plan Converted jobs to MP 195 nonresidential floor area ismii 60 A MP zoo All IIPs and fees are citywide -i g Lost Dutchman Heights may Irequire a separate service area for future fees • lischlerBise Summary of Ten-Year Plan for Infrastructure Needed to Maintain Current LOS Parks & Recreation -15 acres of parkland($3 9 million) -15 park improvements($1 3 million) -2 6 acres of multi-use trails($13,000) -1,000 square feet of recreational facilities ($200,000) Police -9 vehicles($435,000) -29 piece of communications equipment($164,000) Streets -6 63 lane miles of collector roadways ($4 9 million) -3 signalized intersections($360,000) Library -no plans to use development fee revenue to expand Library facilities in the next e rR'se S Tischl 6 3 11/19/2013 Current and Preliminary Total Fees per Single Residential Unit Single Residential Unit Parks& Total Development Fees Library Recreation Police Streets Development Fee Proposed $933 $1,686 $161 $2,325 $5,105 Existing $721 $1,801 $294 $6,323 $9,139 Difference $212 ($115) ($133) ($3,998) ($4,034 Tischlerst 7 Current and Preliminary Total Fees per Nonresidential Category Nonresidential-Police Facilities I I Total Development Fees Proposed Existing Development Fee 'Per Square Foot of Floor Area Commercial $015 $180 ($1 64) Office $0.06 $0 68 ($0 62 Industrial $0.04 $0 27 ($023, Nonresidential-Street Facilities ( Total Development Fees Proposed Existing Development Fee 'Per Square Foot of Floor Area Commercial $4.97 $13 64 ($8 67) Office $2 14 $5 68 ($3 54) Industrial $1 34 $2 26 ($0 92) TischlerBise 8 4 11/19/2013 Apache Junction Adoption Process Schedule November 18, 2013 City Council Work Session on Land Use Assumptions(LU) Infrastructure Improvements Plan (IIP) November 19, 2013 provide notice of public hearing on LU and IIP and publish draft on municipal website 60 days for consensus building • January 21,2014 public hearing on LU&IIP 30 days for consensus buildings and changes to LU&IIP • March 4, 2014 City Council adopts LU&IIP, provide notice of public hearing on development fees and publish materials on website 30 days for consensus building • March 31,2014 City Council Work Session on proposed development fees and development fee ordinance April 15,2014 public hearing on development fees and development fee ordinance 30 days for consensus building and changes to development fees May 20,2014 City Council adopts development fees 75 day mandatory wait period August 4,2014 fees become effective TischlerBise 9 5 City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition Boulevard Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119 Agenda Item No 2 File ID 13-348 Sponsor. Emile Schmid Agenda Date. 11/18/2013 Index Community Infrastructure In Control: City Council Work Session Presentation and discussion on Resolution No 13-39, a resolution of the mayor and city council authorizing the city to enter into an intergovernmental agreement with Pinal County Flood Control District for the construction of the Broadway Avenue /Delaware Drive intersection drainage improvements Presentation and Discussion Attachments. Res 13-39 Memo to Council pdf, Resolution No 13-39 pdf, AJ Broadway Road IGA FINAL_3 pdf City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 11/13/2013 A; *: A Public Works Department V' z ritisfrt2,#tir/h4e/exrowzet„4„ ro. Home of the Superstition Mountains 4 z• Date: November 5, 2013 ... To Mayor and Members of the City Council Through: George Hoffman, City Manager Giao Pham, P E , Public Works Director From• Emile Schmid, P.E., City Engineer Subject. Intergovernmental Agreement with Pinal County Flood Control District Pinal County Flood Control District (PCFCD) initiated a small project assistance program (SPAP) to assist municipalities in Pinal County with funding drainage projects mitigating local and regional drainage issues. PCFCD solicited potential projects from municipalities. City of Apache Junction submitted a project which ultimately became one of two projects selected and recommended by PCFCD and approved by Pinal County as a recipient for funds through the SPAP The program offers PCFCD funds up to $250,000, with a 25% required match from the municipality. The city public works department will be providing funds above the 25% match to reach a combined total of$500,000 available for the project. Funds from PCFCD can be used for design and/or construction. The city currently has an on-call engineering consultant designing the project for a fee of$66,900. The current estimated total construction cost for the Project is$500,000. Construction of the project is anticipated to begin in FY2013. Under the agreement the city is required to procure a contractor and administer the project Upon substantial completion of the project, the city shall invoice PCFCD for the $250,000 available through the SPAP Pinal County and city staff developed the enclosed IGA for city council's consideration. This agreement will allow the city to address a historical drainage issue with the assistance of PCFCD funds. 575 E Baseline Ave , Apache Junction AZ 85119 T (480) 982-1055 • F (480) 982-8005 411. RESOLUTION NO 13-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PINAL COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BROADWAY AVENUE / DELAWARE DRIVE INTERSECTION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, A.R.S . § 11-951 and 28-6701 et seq authorize Pinal County (the "County" ) to layout, maintain, control and manage public roads within the County; and WHEREAS, A R S § 11-951 et seq authorizes public agencies to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the provision of services or for joint or cooperative action, and WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction (the "City" ) has requested that intersection drainage improvements (the "Project" ) be installed near a City owned intersection (the "Location" ) to mitigate drainage issues at the Broadway Avenue and Delaware Drive intersection; and WHEREAS, both the City and the County recognize that the installation of the Project is beneficial to the traveling public and area residents; and WHEREAS, the cost for the future maintenance of the Project will be the responsibility of the City; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to identify and define both the City' s and the County' s respective obligations .•. and responsibilities concerning the installation and maintenance of the Project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AS FOLLOWS. 1) The Mayor and City Council approve the intergovernmental agreement between the City and the County, attached hereto as Attachment A, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the City 2) The City Manager or his designee is authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 13- Page 1 of 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2013 JOHN S . INSALACO Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: RICHARD J. STERN City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 13- Page 2 of 2 Oak When Recorded Return to. Scott Bender,P E,CFM Pmal County Flood Control District P O Box 727 Florence,Arizona 85132 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT For the CONSTRUCTION Of the BROADWAY AVENUE/DELAWARE DRIVE INTERSECTION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Between the CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION And the PINAL COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IGA CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PROJECT NO. PWC2012-17 Agenda Item This Intergovernmental Agreement,heremafter the Agreement,is entered into by and between the City of Apache Junction, an Anzona municipal corporation,acting by and through its City /11 Council,heremafter the"CITY"and the Pinal County Flood Control District, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Arizona, acting by and through its Board of Directors,hereinafter the"DISTRICT" The CITY and the DISTRICT are heremafter the PROJECT PARTNERS and are individually each a PROJECT PARTNER This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it has been executed by all parties and recorded by the Pinal County Recorder. STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION 1. The DISTRICT is empowered by Arizona Revised Statutes(A.R.S.) Section 48-3603, as revised,to enter mto this Agreement and has authorized the undersigned to execute this Agreement on behalf of the DISTRICT 2 The CITY is authonzed by A.R.S. Section 11-952,as amended,to enter into this Agreement and has authorized the undersigned to execute this Agreement on behalf of the CITY 1 BACKGROUND 3. The DISTRICT solicited proposals for local community flood control projects The CITY proposed a project mtended to reduce flooding hazards impacting residents and businesses in the vicinity of the Broadway Avenue and Delaware Dnve intersection,hereinafter the PROJECT(See Exhibit A). 4 The constructed PROJECT will provide the following benefits 4 1 Reduce the flood hazard to residents living near or at the southwest corner of the Broadway Avenue and Delaware Dnve intersection, an area that has experienced histonc flooding. 4.2 Reduce the flood hazard to roadways in the vicimty of the PROJECT that have expenenced historic flooding. 4 3 Any other benefits or objectives beyond those stated in this section are beyond the scope of the PROJECT as the term is used herein, and costs associated with the achievement of those objectives are beyond the scope of this Agreement PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT 5 The purpose of this Agreement is to identify and define the responsibilities of the DISTRICT and the CITY for the PROJECT. TERMS OF AGREEMENT 6 Construction costs associated with the PROJECT are estimated to be$500,000 7 The CITY shall design and construct the PROJECT using CITY funds, and upon completion shall submit an invoice to the DISTRICT for reimbursement of design and construction costs according to the terms in this Agreement. 7.1 Costs associated with nghts-of-way acquisition,permitting,construction management,operations and maintenance are specifically excluded from the reimbursable PROJECT costs. 7.2 The mvoice(s)submitted to the DISTRICT shall include copies of the PROJECT —related billings, invoices,payment vouchers,change orders, or any other backup documentation establishing the amount paid and that the costs being invoiced to the DISTRCT meet the requirements of this Agreement for reimbursement 8 The following costs are expressly excluded from the PROJECT costs under this Agreement 8 1 Multi-use, landscaping, and aesthetic features 8.2 Personnel and administrative expenses costs incurred by either PROJECT PARTNER 2 9. The DISTRICT shall. 9 1 Reimburse 100 percent(100%)of the PROJECT cost incurred up to $250,000 and invoiced by the CITY DISTRICT funds will be from the DISTRICT's secondary tax levy revenues and DISTRICT funding shall be contingent upon the availability of DISTRICT Capital Improvement Program budget funding and in no circumstance shall reimbursement to the CITY exceed$250,000 for this PROJECT The DISTRICT's /"'N percentage cost share for the PROJECT shall not be amended under this Agreement 9 2 Within 60 days of receipt of an invoice from the CITY reimburse the CITY per the terms of this Agreement 9.3 Participate in a fmal inspection of the completed PROJECT with the CITY 10. The CITY shall. 10.1 Fund the entire PROJECT cost. 10.2 Serve as lead agency for all aspects of PROJECT implementation 10.3 Fully fund and not seek DISTRICT reimbursement for all other costs, such as but not limited to recreation, aesthetic, or transportation enhancements, or obtam such funding from other entities 10 4 Provide PROJECT plans and specifications to the DISTRICT, including mtenm submittals as appropnate, for review and comment Incorporate DISTRICT comments into the PROJECT as appropriate The CITY shall not construe DISTRICT review comments,or lack of review comments, as concurrence with the techmcal or structural adequacy of the PROJECT 10 5 Acquire all necessary land nghts for the PROJECT in accordance with state statutes and make all land acquisition records available to the DISTRICT for review, at the DISTRICT'S option 10 6 Provide any proposed construction change orders to the DISTRICT for review and approval if the DISTRICT requests such review during the construction phase. 10 7 Coordinate a fmal inspection of the completed PROJECT with the DISTRICT. 10.8 At PROJECT completion,prepare a final accounting and invoice the DISTRICT for its share of the PROJECT construction costs 10 8 1 Final accounting shall include an accounting of all sources of PROJECT funding, if sources not reasonably discoverable by City staff other than the DISTRICT are available, validating that the CITY has not received reimbursements for the PROJECT from multiple entities,public or private,that collectively exceed the PROJECT construction cost 10 9 Be responsible for operation and maintenance of the completed PROJECT 3 10.9.1 The maintenance activities to be performed include,but are not limited to maintaining the flood control function of the PROJECT, including vegetation control and removal, debns removal, earth backfill to address soil removal, and riprap replacement 10 9 1 1 The CITY shall conduct inspections of the completed PROJECT annually and immediately following storm events meeting or exceeding the PROJECT design level. 10.10 Be fully responsible for the completed PROJECT and any public or private use of the PROJECT and indemnify, defend and hold harmless the DISTRICT as provided in paragraph 16 herein. 10 11 If necessary, obtam a United States Army Corps of Engmeers' Section 404 Environmental Permit for the PROJECT The cost of this permit and any required mitigation are not a component of the shared PROJECT construction cost 10 12 Require that any contractor selected for the PROJECT 10 12.1 Warrant its compliance with all federal immigration laws and regulations that relate to its employees and their compliance with A R S Section 23-214(A), 10 12 2 Agree that a breach of the warranty under paragraph 10 12 1 shall be deemed a material breach of contract and is subject to penalties up to and including termination of the contract, 10.12 3 Agree that the DISTRICT retains the legal right to inspect the papers of the contractor or subcontractor employee(s)who work(s)on this Agreement to ensure that contractor or subcontractor is complying with the warranty under paragraph 10 12 1, 11. Any local permits required for the PROJECT shall be issued by the appropnate PROJECT PARTNER at no cost to the PROJECT 12. Either party to this Agreement may with mutual written agreement of all parties, delegate responsibilities to another party. Any delegation, however, shall not relieve the delegating party of its ongmal responsibilities as defined herein 13 In the case of any dispute over any items in this Agreement,the parties agree to use their best efforts and enter into good faith negotiations to resolve the disputed matters. However,this shall not limit the rights of the parties to seek any remedies provided by law 14 Each party to this Agreement shall take reasonable and necessary actions within its authority to ensure that only storm water is discharged into the PROJECT, and that such discharges mto the PROJECT comply at the point of discharge with any applicable requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act,Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System or any other applicable discharge requirements,including any permit requirements 4 fr /IN 15. The parties to this Agreement agree to equally share the cost of PROJECT compliance and cost audit to be initiated within 60 days of PROJECT completion, if requested by a PROJECT PARTNER. An independent auditing firm agreed to by both PROJECT PARTNERS will perform the audit Any payments or reimbursements necessary to bring the PROJECT into compliance with the audit fmdmgs shall be made within 45 calendar days of acceptance by all parties of the audit report /IN 16 Each party to this Agreement(mdemmtor) shall, to the extent permissible by law, indemnify, defend and save harmless the others(indemmtees)mcludmg agents,officers, directors, governors and employees thereof, from and agamst any loss or expense incurred as a result of any claim or suit of any nature whatsoever, which arises out of indemmtor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions pursuant to this Agreement Such mdemmfication obligation shall encompass any personal injury, death or property damages resulting from the indemnitor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions, as well as reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, and other expenses relating to the defense against claims or litigation, incurred by the indemnitee Indemnitee shall be liable for its own negligence or wrongful acts as provided by law 17 Each party to this Agreement shall comply with A.R.S. Sections 41-4401 and 23-214, subsection A 17 1 Each party to this Agreement retains the legal nght to mspect the records of the other party's and any contractors' or subcontractors' employees performing work under this Agreement to verify compliance with A R S Sections 41-4401 and 23-214, subsection A. 17.2 Failure by either party to this Agreement to comply with A R S Sections 41-4401 and 23-214, subsection A shall be deemed a breach of this Agreement and is subject to penalties up to and including termination of the Agreement 18 All notices or demands upon either party to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person or sent by mail addressed as follows. Pmal County Flood Control District City of Apache Junction County Engmeer City Engmeer P 0 Box 727 575 E. Baselme Ave. Florence,Arizona 85132 Apache Junction,Arizona 85119 19 Each party to this Agreement will pay for and not seek reimbursement for its own personnel and administrative costs associated with this PROJECT, including but not limited to the following,unless specifically identified otherwise in this Agreement• design, contract preparation, construction, construction management,operation,maintenance,permitting, management and administration 20 This Agreement shall expire two(2) years from the date of recording with the County Recorder,or upon completion of the PROJECT and after all funding obligations and reimbursements have been satisfied in accordance with this Agreement,whichever is the first to occur The County Engineer may agree in wntmg to extend the expiration date for up to two additional years upon a demonstration by the CITY that an extension is justified By mutual written agreement of the DISTRICT and CITY this Agreement may be otherwise amended or 5 terminated Potential amendments are restricted by paragraphs 7.1 and 8 of this Agreement The liability, operation and maintenance, and indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall survive the expiration of this Agreement. This Agreement is subject to cancellation by either party pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. Section 38-511. 21 Attached to this Agreement or contained herein are the written determinations by the appropriate attorneys for the parties to this Agreement,that these agencies are authorized under the laws of the State of Arizona to enter into this Agreement and that it is in proper form 22 If legislation is enacted after the effective date of this Agreement that changes the relationship or structure of one or more parties to this Agreement,the parties agree that this Agreement shall be renegotiated at the written request of either party 23 The PROJECT will be planned and designed to meet the recurrence interval of the 10 year or lesser event and this level of protection is specifically approved by the Board of Directors of the Pinal County Flood Control District 24. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona Any action at law or in equity brought by either party for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for in this Agreement, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in Pinal County, State of Arizona The parties hereby waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceeding to any other county. In the event either party shall bring suit to enforce any teen of this Agreement or to recover any damages for and on account of the breach of any term or condition in this Agreement, it is mutually agreed that the prevailing party in such action shall recover all costs including• all litigation and appeal expenses, collection expenses,reasonable attorneys' fees, necessary witness fees and court costs to be determined by the court in such action. 25 Neither party shall be considered not to have performed its obligations under this Agreement in the event of enforced delay(an"Enforced Delay")due to causes beyond its 01 control and without its fault or negligence or failure to comply with Applicable Laws,including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods,epidemics,pandemics,quarantme,restrictions, embargoes, labor disputes, and unusually severe weather or the delays of subconsultants or matenalmen due to such causes,acts of a public enemy,war,terrorism or act of terror(including but not limited to bio-terrorism or eco-terronsm),nuclear radiation,blockade,insurrection,not, labor strike or interruption,extortion, sabotage,or similar occurrence or any exercise of the power of eminent domain of any governmental body on behalf of any public entity,or a declaration of moratorium or similar hiatus(whether permanent or temporary)by any public entity directly affecting the PROJECT In no event will Enforced Delay include any delay resulting from unavailability for any reason of labor shortages,or the unavailability for any reason of particular consultants, subconsultants, vendors or investors desired by CITY in connection with the Project CITY agrees that CITY alone will bear all risks of delay which are not Enforced Delay In the event of the occurrence of any such Enforced Delay,the time or times for performance of the obligations of the Party claiming delay shall be extended for a period of the Enforced Delay;provided, however, that the Party seeking the benefit of the provisions of this Section shall,within thirty(30)calendar days after such Party knows or should know of any such Enforced Delay, first notify the other Party of the specific delay in writing and 6 claim the right to an extension for the period of the Enforced Delay; and provided further that in no event shall a period of Enforced Delay exceed ninety(90)calendar days 26 CITY and DISTRICT each believe that the execution,delivery and performance of this Agreement are in compliance with all applicable laws However, in the unlikely event that any provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable(or is construed as requiring either party to do any act m violation of any applicable laws, including any constitutional provision, ^, law,regulation, or City Code), such provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement and this Agreement shall otherwise remain m full force and effect;provided that this Agreement shall retroactively be deemed reformed to the extent reasonably possible in such a manner so that the reformed agreement(and any related agreements effective as of the same date)provide essentially the same rights and benefits(economic and otherwise)to the parties as if such severance and reformation were not required. Unless prohibited by applicable laws,the parties further shall perform all acts and execute, acknowledge and/or deliver all amendments, instruments and consents necessary to accomplish and to give effect to the purposes of this Agreement, as reformed 7 PINAL COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT A Municipal Corporation Recommended by County Engineer Date Approved and Accepted• By. Chairman, Board of Directors Date Attest. By Clerk of the Board Date The foregoing Intergovernmental Agreement FCD has been reviewed pursuant to A R S Section 11-952, as amended, by the undersigned General Counsel, who has determined that it is in proper form and within the powers and authority granted to the Final County Flood Control District under the laws of the State of Arizona. Ado it. General Counsel Date 8 Ink Aft. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION A Municipal Corporation Approved and Accepted By Mayor Date Attest By. City Clerk Date The foregoing Intergovernmental Agreement FCD has been reviewed pursuant to A R S Section 11-952, as amended, by the undersigned attorney who has determined that it is in proper form and within the power and authority granted to the CITY under the laws of the State of Arizona ... City Attorney Date 9 Exhibit A: BROADWAY AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ,, , .-- . sk r 1 - -„11/..4 of .r. E , 47 r M .BROAQWAYA E;a ' .. , -, i iiiiraill'7- It "I' 4 ,:. • k i IS . I . " 7F t { `F—1 —L- i s ..r c OW t i' r' A. P Il r d P [' t• ..k • •P Mt t r . r z OFF NM - $ , sue,.• i flltr IV , 4 * � a r �, .t►'"'.� ' arti r 4 • i PQACHE✓ LEGEND o� Gy FLOODED PROPERTIES i.N- -- PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREA v z —.,_— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN Q PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 4RIZ014P 10 Project Description: During rain events storm water runoff ponds m the Broadway Avenue and Delaware Drive intersection causing a hazard and potential safety issue to local traffic as well as flooding of several residential structures located southwest of the mtersection Additionally,parcels adjacent to Lawther Drive located south of Broadway Avenue and one block east of Delaware Dnve also experience local flooding eIN The project will mvolve engaging a civil engineering consultant to evaluate existmg drainage conditions at the mtersection of Broadway Road and Delaware Drive to recommend conveyance/capacity improvements to the drainage system in the mtersection. Consultant will also evaluate a potential storm dram system m Lawther Road and l Oth Avenue to convey local flows to the existing channel along the west side of Delaware Drive between Broadway Avenue and 16th Avenue, and if necessary, recommend designimprovements tothe channelto r p c anne increase capacity and/or mitigate channel erosion Upon completion of the design and recommendations, the City will construct the project under the Pmal County Small Project Assistance Program 11 VrCity of Apache Junction, Arizona 300E Superstition Boulevard Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119 Agenda Item No 3 File ID: 13-352 Sponsor Matt Busby Agenda Date: 11/18/2013 Index. In Control: City Council Work Session Presentation and discussion on the second amendment to the lease agreement between Verizon Wireless and the City of Apache Junction for location of communication equipment on city property Presentation and discussion. Verizon Wireless has requested a second amendment to their wireless lease agreement with the city As background, the city owns a 80-foot tall wireless communications tower from which space is leased to wireless providers to provide service to the area Lease payments to the city equate to approximately$2,400 per month In summary, the proposed second amendment will allow for following provisions 1 Two new underground conduits and pull boxes One for city use and one for use by Verizon Wireless to bring in a new fiber connection from Superstition Blvd 2 A one time fee of$10,000 paid by Verizon Wireless 3 Relocation of the new conduit, pull boxes and other related facilities if at a future date the city needs the areas for capital projects, infrastructure improvements or other public needs 4 The reaffirmation of the terms in the original agreement Attachments: Second Amend PHO Plank_clean copy nov 6, Second Amendment Exhibit A PHO Plank. Second A City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 11/13/2013 DRAFT 11 /06/13 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN VERIZON WIRELESS AND THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR LOCATION OF COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ON CITY PROPERTY This SECOND AMENDMENT (this "Second Amendment"), is made this day of , 2013 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the City of Apache Junction, an Arizona municipal corporation ("Lessor") and Gila River Cellular General Partnership, an Arizona general partnership, DBA Verizon Wireless ("Lessee"). Lessor and Lessee are individually or collectively referred to herein as "Party"or"Parties". RECITALS A) The Parties entered into a Lease Agreement dated October 3, 2006 and entered into the First Amendment to the Lease Agreement dated December 21, 2009 (collectively, the "Agreement"). B) Since 2006, Lessee has leased land located at 1001 N. Idaho Road, City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona ("Premises") for an 80-foot tall wireless communications tower and related equipment, which is the subject of the Agreement and this Second Amendment C) This Second Amendment will allow for the installation of conduit and pull boxes to service the telecommunications facilities at the Premises D) The Parties have agreed to amend the terms of the Agreement for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE,the Agreement is hereby amended as follows. 1. New Underground Conduit/Pull Boxes: Lessee shall have the right to install and maintain one (1) four inch (4") underground conduit from the telecommunications junction box on the Lessee equipment shelter to a new 24" x 36" traffic rated pull box, then to another 24" x 36" pull box, then to the connection at the SRP vault on the Property, as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit"B" attached hereto in this Second Amendment. Lessee shall also install,for the Lessor's use, one (1)four inch (4") underground conduit("Lessor's Conduit")from a new 24" x 36" traffic rated pull box located near City's IT Building, then to the connection at the SRP vault on the Property, as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto in this Second Amendment Upon installation, Lessor's Conduit shall be deemed to be the sole personal property of Lessor without any warranties, express or implied. 2. Legal Consideration. For accommodating the Lessee for this expansion of use, Lessee agrees to pay Lessor a one-time fee of Ten Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($10,000.00), payable no later than sixty (60) calendar days from the Effective Date. 3. Relocation. In the event that the areas in any of Lessee's equipment, including fiber, conduit, pull boxes and any other related facilities, need to be relocated due to conflicts with current or future Lessor capital projects, infrastructure improvements or other public needs, Lessee shall relocate such facilities within a reasonable amount of time at its sole cost to locations as directed by the City Engineer. 4. Reaffirmation of Terms: The Parties reaffirm the Agreement and agree and acknowledge that, except as expressly set forth in this Second Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect according to its terms. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the Agreement and this Second Amendment, the terms of this Second Amendment shall govern. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date set forth above. "LESSOR" CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION By: Name: JOHN S. INSALACO Title: Mayor Date: ATTEST. By: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By. Richard J. Stern, City Attorney Date "LESSEE" GILA RIVER CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, DBA VERIZON WIRELESS BY: Cellco Partnership ITS: managing general partner By: Name: Walter L. Jones, Jr. Title. Area Vice President Network Date. 2 High Desert Communications 372 W Cullumber Ave, Gilbert, AZ Customer contact. Diego Torres 480-632-0020 B-1 #126436 L-11 #126436 Office• 602-819-2949 Site Name• PHO Plank SRP contact Mike Unser Office. 602-278-6182 Site address. 1001 N Idaho RD HDC contact. Doug Kleck Apache Junction, AZ Cell: 602-919-1737 Date: 1-23-13 Existing pull box , ii ..r. +/-140' o New 24"x 36" _ , J •1 I I U I I I I Traffic rated pull +[-3so' box by the GC (1 I III I \1 �' New -- illi IU 0 111, interduct 0_ 5 New 4" ; ' 1n a c > I 4 cc - - nipples E z W a EJ EijthroU wall i `i r' 1 -" v �.a ' JIIIII L) 3/4, OI Existing 4"conduit with 2—1% I 0 interducts, 1 is spare+/-380' i . _x cc t Existing 4"conduit with 3—1 Y. i _ I ` , ) (5 -0 interducts,2 are spare+/-140' I R, 1 „., ,,,, ,.;,r) \ , New, 1-4"conduit U G from the �` , telco J Box on the shelter to the pull box,from the pull box to the meet point vault as per code by I the GC with 3—1'/<interducts and ' ' a trace wire i +/-15' '' il i New 24"x 36" meet : point vault by the GC '. ; . r_; I GC to provide a 4"conduit from the meet point vaults to the SRP vaults � New SRP vault by SRP , % '',� •/ = is Superstition Blvd ) Rack space is limited, NEG 48 is good .- -1 1 77%._..... „ : '- • l' ' '' ',, •;. , • t ' t . ' it.' - - .`_•-,,,,,r--r*•'• r '..' .,-- r"-;. ' • • ' ' ' • - • ' '•• ' ' i r ifi -..4-,-••*;-0, -• • . . _,..,. '..-.... • r •,r •••• ' ; _ ; "; , ; , ' ; ; 1 r. ; • ,s- • !;:", • . ,i, ,.,„;,,,„;;,„..1 '; ', ; i . 4Vq.; • , ". , . • , . r .. ' .r-. --• *4-"•;.'! ' "k 6:.,..i-frit L',.,.1 10 i i,T,IN. '1 ,. . .„I - ,,.., ,, - . ' Existing telco box ----- : > ,, • '•*Xi • -., -- - -. -" - • ••-• • ..•-'•;. ..; . ....P4 --:-.------------ . 0 •..„„ • .......-• ,... i ' • . .'• • i ' 1 ,•-.. . , : - ../... ....,.., . , 4 I 1„ , I •... 4"Existing >1 .-. - . ,-._..,..•- ' I - ';'. 1 conduit , . „ • ; .., \ -- 0- .. . . - •- ...,, ...-•'.4, - ' .I ew 4" con:. I - . . ;•. , •,, . ,i-.• ' i\ ,, , . ..... -- . '-. ;;;• - i,..,,'--,, -••";•••'• , 4 0,, t .!. . , • . , :...-,' _::',',..,,,, 4,$,A,-.:, i" -.- .• . * ..:,,,..--:;4i..,--.-w.i..0---•,-.-- --410 ' ' ''.;:;!'•• " ' . .. . . _,.._. , ; 4 . • ,., . • r '. '• * '''i C-`', •''''. -,',.-Vt., ,..: ."..,". ' .,, , , Z...,'4'-'-''.'.44.,,c:c... ._,t.:. : '` •__..fa•,. . c....?".... ,:;,, * , . 'T. 7 : f 4 i ,„ '1'11'044 Av . ..,.--,4-2.---- -•.,e4-11311( ' ---,, . ' 4 ;"''''''':-• - ' ' '1 " ki- ''./'' -kV 't---..-. -.., '‘4.--71 'vf--',-Abs. - -• - _ ' n. . . .,...:'2, . . at _„3111. n. . , , *.5, %6 40 ';'''' limilt, • . .. ,,-::__, '-,' -t!. .. AIM. ggpak, I , . . ..'•,„. I :.t";',. -• • • .' Pilillilk - . ,.., 4"'conduit ,_ - ... ,, . . . „- _ ,, ,,,•". • ...„-F. .;....,„;.....4„,... ' -0. . • ,....„, . . , ••,.._ • ._ . . . . , „ ..,_ . •.-. .. , - •• Existingc • , .. , .• . fr, • - •, --s- :tog;. ,r;,-;•• ", New 4 conduit ' ;:::-.,--0.•-•.-„,:-. .. •. ', '•"P-:-.4,io',..}' ''''''...- ,;,...4,,',i,'.' L r •- • -,.•• ,,,,-.,,,,, •-„.•L,. ... ' . .---______• ,,•,L, . ... L „ .......... ''. .. _. ': ' .'rk-' , ...'•-•,',..1:',;;;-,: ,,.••., .-• •- ; ';','"',•••,..J.,,,„ ., , —• .... ..... . -4.:-. .• .-:',"."....00.,....„ — — — — . Aft ealktot— li '"`"." . .. . arftitt4/0i; ' * ' E '''-. ' ll ') ' 2.".•,,,:;.--:.''' .''li,r,;':.,':;;;',.''.. ...4. 1,1,;::.-',M5';547.4.'.... ,:.,:',:...:-.. -.,.: . _ ....„„ ...„ .,.,,,. • . i".• • . , .. . - , I* . -.-.:--' •, , • • ' . , 4.,,, - .. . .. . , ... . ',• r rt..40411., '41,' ' •* ' 'i' 5'' '' ' - • . • -,.... : v , - ..,.......... A . , ' - 0, ..• :,,.---; . . '-. .--.. -• ---;:i..-- -.------ - . -- - 4 co ,- ,": bk - .•!,:',.„;', . .. • • - - - - -•----;- - — - -, -- • — • , .r.•-i--.....m.....m...------- _ . .... . , ag- r ' • „ • .. , ,• , .,..,,,_, ''. I• :-' , • , . . . .- ' ' .. .' -.- :, yault,-- -• ...,_ . ... . - . ...•-- • •-illo •.,. , r-.-.,. 1 ..„, : , . . . ... , _...., ... ,, . .. :,..- ,,,,,orei., 4,.• • - .,, . „ --2----, . . New 24"x 36"Traffi - - - - ' • ' -'-,'..t.r.t_'.'--_,-.-' --:,,' { i< rated pull box . . , .. 4... -- New SRP vault • 7',-• ...:-....-.2 . . - . , .,._ .. .. ,...„ . ..,.. --,„ 2013/01/17 , . • 1-, : '.--i-- -....,.- Are' '; . , :: _ . , • .1.,1,.. . .,....,.., . ,,,, 4 .• "' . . ._ ,..- ,,,...,*'- ,-:-..'• ...• . • ' -,':.''',.-::".''':,':'...i4:•:.:,04.4:, •itt,;,'..0.,::. ,,. ..., , ... , .-:. ..,..4!2- -, .. 'Al 'N. .';‘, . • - * •, . - . • , .<- .. , . ,., .,. -. , - . • ,. . • _ _ , • • „4,,, ' - • .'., rr -....., ..".3.;:,:o . , , .., If.... •:.: r - ., .• , '1. . ^ . r ...--4 -'''.'•-••-*-•- ...,.. . -- ----- - . • , - ..... .. -----_- ,....-..., /,',..e, ''-• ...---------__-. • 1 , . _ . • .•-t• ',.-‹• ,,,0&40.0lrfor..1,- 4......,4!" . ' ' /': - •• --.. ,., - -- -'.;:k.- •. -.A,i4-..1-4C,L.'-N _ .'' . — ,4•.,--... •- ... ..4f......,,,,,,.. --- . 4 -- ' - -7-1i-;-`,:d. 1 -•' 11111ffiliiiUS ,• _ 4 - .,.. ' •cl740,-, - • .„--, ) .... . .. . . , , . ... . , . . . ...„ ...„....-L ..., , , ........: 411" .. '- .., , --- . ...• . - .. .... . -7..,--. 9,. ...",.W.: „,..',.:4.4,, ....-,,,• ,,i , i . . Or 1 • .. .' ...lr''/..., •-...:•-..mo,e,,;,,Y •••• ' , . - , . . n. '' " ' i on.ult -.,. ..(4,"„ •• ..... . •,,- .,... ..,,, "\. • .. •- ...,- ...,..-• -„,„..fiti.,„. ..,--,.:,r, , . - . ._ . . ..... . .. . , - ...... . . -. .. : . -,....7,„-.,-,„..-L,,,•-•••".i.,..v.. -- ... .•..,,-.",...,-' •-4tT...•-;,t,,-.-:,'‘ ' •. \ -- , !sting If. bct-- , . ..... .....„_.. _ . . _ , . - •-.7.t. • .• „ ..,.,..„. .- „..., . . .. .4..-„ N..- ,..,...,•..- .„. . ft) ,"t. •'• ,' ' ' -•• ' '•.• ..',. .... ,, • ''' ''' Jr' ...1'. 1 ,,,,i,„1„m...... ,,." 7,,,,',411,,ii'' ,2,!;:",nc",:.';.-, .:•-•- :''''I 13/.i• '''''' ,i' '•' . ".'.• , i ''04' ')'-'6'14-'.S?:A''''.. .,''''''''`,$',i'll.'' ..4.''. "' •S'1.9.!:..'-it;4C--;:".:.'.".::2'-"'''. ..,';.'''$:::::fltr.4•0114 .;7'.1',4...,';',,-, . '..N.,,,, p 1,10,t . . — -•,:,,,,v,,,,-,..0..,‘,,,,,•+„ ..• A$,..-, ,.•„,... , ,., ,A5,-...‘t,,,itt., .Cr.kcir-,%. t44,‘ - :,,K1,4*&•',•,',,:.„.,..,•-,,'-...,. ,,,,,,?,...1:.•:44t,..'c,•., -....-„.. :'''.,4-1 -,tV4-7..'•'-0'4".4:4' '•",.".0,v,..1.- ,i.;. • , ' '.,,,:::•••:ir-rr..._`.•-•. „ '','''.-.riN7:"7.'-`.0.4*.i" '-',-,..' •---",r,:•,-....-"11,1';'`.i•,?;''.'.'st•V'7,''''',"...'''''''''',..:.....:Ki.;.„‘N:ri,V,I,X.',.•'-',"7,"-i:-.,5, •;',,' ,:-...,...-,,,- ---'','A---., .... . .- „. . . . ) .4W.,11.';.-:?4, ' ,,,i 1-:_t=.4' -;'''..,',''.•'..• : - , 1,...' • #qr qfr: o f it a ro 44.1e --0, r � 1 ~�b 'ryi �Rf �Jp•�9t1 "., 2 R Al fi : ' .gk . . ‘ l - �` 71 '4' A r trA ; nrl 4a � t Rs ,';' q yr, r „A ilibv, .„A a r yr Rq} • .\i',c•Il-`` '/ '' l• New 4" conduit by %�\j,__._ Existing meet point•u�talt • GC ♦ New"SRP vault by SRP - ___.... i �yy,l i— —- -- . / .iF't��r t,-. +"vti�z-i'r�','ti ,' ea.� {{ - .. .�; ' .k .141 t t n t j{ pen - .4� ♦ •• ,0..:, e.,, tfr ', \ :' o r Yk y�v • rq li i • '<< y ;m: a�i '}ry C 't G.Ai�r - •`a•.'!''',!..'-„,..,:,;, .,',':,;',4",,..'.; 1�5 f y,` ` . �.a- _t ' •rL r,..- `i , „ +r M. t,r1: b ` r r VI ti y",,.. � "'�k 1*y,�,..v.:. f� �r � '�.r •�, VerjM/1 wireless 726 W GEM/N/OR �mDEa.A TEMPE AZ 55283 PRAMM141Q IET.S. — we'3S WE aM 9i Mk• ,Agv / SEC. TNNFHo.'russc TER DOLU sec we E • NOR, OWING DERECTIONS _ t 1..E MEC EMI TOWARDS oBFEpDr RD MID NEM NORM MRS I �. eLPO EE..TAKE SEOOIO IErTNTO LESSOR'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION 6 �T_ TOWNIP I NORTH.MME e.THE OF THE MA AM SALT RM.EMU ORMITER OF AND I I I THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS IA ERCINI.PM T, I I 1 SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY /f■ PIN. BY NATURE.ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER T LAN THAT WHICH RELATES PROPOSED LESSEE UIBITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO THE CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. •_m FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LARD BEM A PORTION o THE SOUTHWEST 1 I I I WAIVERRI.0,F'Mk SOUTHWEST Q I I I FIELD FM. TCN R COUP,ENDOSOUOLA.IDT OF 70.CALA AFEETT OSERNm SIDEND SALT FRYER E IOFi,EIP AIM RI O I I I DRAWN BY' MAT FOLLOWINGecISREO aNTERLme OF SAID SECTION le FROM WHEN CC CHECKED BY. AM COMMENCSO AT ME SOU,ME eAID SECOONIMIEARS SOL,MM.. I I I A I .A EETMENGE SOUTH PPSte WEST.IONS THE SOUTH LPN Of_TILE SAID EEn»IENDE NOR,,, I I REVISIONS .WYFETTTo OC EG...MEIIDENOR APN 10d-01-003A I` NORRIDD PEP WESTER.),FEET I ESOU.M EAST..IMAIFEETDANCESOUTHPOIOSSMERT. RI ( . aEFEE TO TM POPS REAR I W 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4,SW 1/4 ai s<� 1 al SURVEYORS NOTE O.HF TAIL 1 A TOLE REPORT W NO/PROOFED ALTHEDEMTHIEDRI Y I /SE I ; IS K 2. DURVEYOR RIM GET IRE A SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORDS TO r I I I NO. GTE OSSOR.1ION 3. THE ME� CT PI TIRE_ OINO.ry NHEREOND TONOUE...ED li 41. E 1/2OFTHESW 1/4,SW 1/4 NOT A.OIADARYSURVEYOF _. WNI ODs NOT GUMM,EE TOT ALLL«IEITES ARE SHOW OR1I:IIIIIIIIIIVII II110 I DNE TABLE I MS DEvEL OPEN,OCM.OWE STAKEANDA NIEa.0OLYNHL 13-O -- _ LEpT r 1 f PGIENCIES TO LOCATE NLU,YtESPRICPTDCDHSTRNn,cK c-IC s I F,sT MT Kr OWE REMOVAL ROF TM ELOCATES AOp REmAEEHTIS HEREEPONSBEm —� _`�' I I I I NPECO0DW _ I :1 " e"I MP SE SEW Consulting Ilc 1 il u nu, Ur az IEEN' Land IHTO*,S� ,W ASDLror. PROJECT META DATA x Ls DM SSP tSJEw levee. IEVATDNS SHOWN HERE.ARE REPRESENTED m,IORIW I >fl I I aRAWaRm AVERT.VERT.I. me(WAM)m)ESTABLISHED FROM p I ewMvniN Gem CPS DER ELLIPSOID MODE APPLYING OEM N SEPARANONS 4' ® .. I PAID mnr.R4.USER 9[nv�E-mes,sSOL Oi PNS OEMS TM IS MEarO I. = 41 I ' I R. SEMMESSHOWEDHEREONAREMANEOI U.S.STATEAONE I ® I I ) PROJECT NO mAE CENTRAL.DETEAMTED SY ORS DRCENL.AT ORS. I I I 09001314 s FIELD W.%iO.THIS PROJECT WAS PE/VC.NED.0am,I3. 1 • I I I I I SITE NAME: 'r� PHO PLANK t v ELE T POLERIC..1Em�CEP.S.6 PES T¢EP.aNE VAT NNE SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD °L :AACC.E�auiPS OW ACCESS AYSW SLIEST TALE cPu c011rniTEMADOMYM.T I C CONCRETE Y. S FOT ELEVATION♦ PUSOF GEODETIC POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATE$ GRAPHIC SCALE �' SITE SURVEY m. ,HTNAOMI i 1 — - rT 10°38' --- TAD.. FLEPAPON R GROUND.Ilel,p AVDELS1� 1`I MAGNETIC \ SHEET NO. REVISION: rI a PEER I DECLINATIONI — LEASEL.E 1 NFE Iw n NORTH Fseo Se/E,/IS LS-1 ,I - SAA.0 . ® ® BB a?i PEB B.R (-CURB C ® o ® ® ' ®I A I : m ® .Pr.., .... �.,.a« Ve® EIii I ff : RBSEE EVADE PROPOSEBEB , R.mEBDE. 111 wre/es s ` CUR.-7 ® „Al Au — ,Evn- c °" pe _ 126 W GEM/NI OR TEMPE AZ 85283 a o �= °a REEPE° tr 1 SIDEWALK I,' A.rB APN 100 01- 03A n il III I I I EI ORaU F Rw/ Y��1.1111111111t `- �' 'ENR..- . P� �1 0 .. //i ) q0 Y NIpoi, es pI�E00�. It aer ..i. , THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS I PROPRIETARY /// II�� iFl e,"ica Movsa�F •• � BY NATURE.ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH cLOSuR TO THE CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED IEIEWIPMEM' I FIELD BY. TCN II ' DRAWN BY: 200 �I�wEO LEssEEs �siOEwA.La . CHECKED BY' mf ~ UtAIn eABEFENr �(�'1A • II • A n REVISIONS CURE I II N I � 2n 2 04N3L13 FINAL SUBMITTAL DETAIL A" I 03p3/12 PRELIM SUBMITTAL "�1 SCALE 1"=10' NO. DATE DESCRIPTION I 'I �tBITaNSFozM I► Ea I LEGEND sr FIRE WORM, r 1 f VALVEPI wroSR CONTROL II I• E I I Consulting,,Ilc *El Po SWIM i1T LIGHT <r , eIF• EPHONE Ns ON I I Of BMW* UMW�•„r_ PV ASPHALT I rePROJ090POB POW,OF A I s EwALaSITE POINT LLX • �nov+ PHO• AAuSITE• M 1001.PILES. . APAAZ WRB II I II I SUPERSTITION BOULEVARD Ow I\ -: `I--E E 1 1 SHEET TITL GRAPHIC SCALE • SITE SURVEY • 1 �'\ I 1 I..T I ie n. L.Ro ornn0 SUPERSTITION 1 BOULEVARD DETAIL"B" SHEET NO. REVISION: ---_-_L- __--_-__ SCALE 1 =10 ----- LS-2 01"coet, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ,e > PINAL COUNTY RECORDER ' `�: " LAURA DEAN-LYTLE When recorded return to: Richard Joel Stern, Esq. DATE/TD . 10/10/06 1606 n '1 Apache Junction City Attorney FEE: $24.50 300 East Superstition Blvd. PAGES: 32 Apache Junction, AZ 85219 FEE NUMBER: 2006-142056 CAPTION HEADING LEASE AGREEMENT WITH VERIZON WIRELESS FOR LOCATION OF COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ON CITY PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WiTH VERIZON WIRELESS FOR LOCATION OF COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ON CITY PROPERTY /� fR This Lease Agreement ("Lease"), made this O ay of 2006 , between the CiTY OF APACHE JUNCTION, an Arizona municipal corporation, with its principal offices located at 300 East Superstition, Apache Junction, Arizona/Tax ID #86-0358590 ("Lessor") and GILA RIVER CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona general partnership, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS, by Cellco Partnership, its managing general partner, with its principal offices at One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920 ("Lessee"), both of which at times collectively may be referred to as the "Parties" or individually as the "Party." RECITALS WHEREAS, Lessor is the owner in fee simple of a parcel of land located in the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, State of Arizona, identified as Pinal County Parcel No. 100-01-003A1 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, an 80 foot high monopole type tower (`Tower") and equipment shelter owned by Lessor is located on the Property; and WHEREAS, Lessor desires to lease to Lessee, and Lessee desires to lease from Lessor, a portion of the Property depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, in order to enable Lessee to erect, operate and maintain certain communication equipment of Lessee (the "Antenna Facilities") (also set forth in detail on Exhibit A) on the terms and conditions set forth below. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, Lessor leases to Lessee a portion of the Property consistent with the terms and conditions, agreed by the parties as follows: 1. PREMISES, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE: Lessor hereby leases to the Lessee a portion of that certain space ("the Tower Space") on the Lessor's Tower, located at 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, Pinal County, and ground space for Lessee's approximate 14' x T outdoor equipment cabinet and Lessee's generator, together with space for all wires, cables, conduits and pipes running between Lessee's Tower Space and ground space (which Tower Space, ground space, all connections and rights of access shall be referred to collectively herein as the "Premises"), which Premises are specifically depicted on Exhibit A. Lessee at all times during this Lease, shall have ingress and egress by foot or motor vehicle to the Property twenty-four (24) hours a day without the necessity of providing notice to Lessor, except where such access is due to an emergency, or is otherwise made between the hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Mondays through Fridays, excepting holidays, in such case Lessee shall notify the Assistant City Manager, whose contact information is Bryant Powell, 300 East Superstition Boulevard, Apache Junction, AZ 85219, (480) 982-8002, or designee upon arrival. The Property may be accessed by means of the existing driveway and parking area over Property. Lessor shall be allowed during the Lease to enter the Property to inspect and examine all facilities for safety reasons or to insure that Lessee's covenants are being met. Lessor shall provide Lessee with a minimum of forty-eight (48) hours notice and shall be accompanied by a representative of Lessee should Lessor require access into the shelter or Property, except where such access is due to an emergency. This Lease is not a franchise pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated Section 9-502, nor is it a permit to use the rights-of-way under Apache Junction City Code, Vol. I, Article 13-3. Any such franchise or permit must be obtained separately from Lessor. In addition, this Lease is not a grant of license of any kind, under local, state or federal authority. Lessor hereby grants permission to Lessee to install, maintain and operate the radio communications equipment, antennas and appurtenances described and depicted in Exhibit A. Lessee reserves the right to replace the aforementioned equipment with similar and comparable equipment provided said replacement does not increase the Tower load. Prior to any change Lessee makes to the number or type of antennas on Lessee's Tower Space, Lessee shall obtain Lessor's prior, written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 2. SURVEY AND AS-BUILT DRAWINGS. Lessor also hereby grants to Lessee the right to survey the Property, and said survey shall then become Exhibit B which shall be attached hereto and made a part hereof, and shall control in the event of boundary and access discrepancies between it and Exhibit A. Cost for such work shall be borne by the Lessee. Within Thirty (30) calendar days after Commencement Date, Lessee shalt provide Lessor with as-built drawings of the Antenna Facilities and the improvements installed on the Property, which show the actual location of all equipment and improvements consistent with Exhibit B. A drawing shall be accompanied by a complete and detailed inventory of all equipment, personal property, and Antenna Facilities. 3. TERM AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE. A. This Agreement shalt be effective as of the date of execution by both Parties, provided, however, the initial term ("Term") shall be for five (5) years and shall commence on the Commencement Date (as hereinafter defined) at 2 which time rental payments shall commence and be due at a total annual rental of Twenty Four Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($24,000.00) (:`Base Rent") or Two Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000.00) to be paid in equal monthly installments on the first day of the month, in advance, to Lessor or to such other person, firm or place as Lessor may, from time to time, designate in writing at least thirty (30) days in advance of any rental payment date. The Agreement shall commence on the first day of the month following the date Lessee commences installation of the equipment on the Premises (the "Commencement Date"). Lessor and Lessee agree that they shall execute a written acknowledgement confirming the Commencement Date. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge and agree that initial rental payment(s) shall not actually be sent by Lessee until thirty (30) days after a written acknowledgement confirming the Commencement Date. By way of illustration of the preceding sentence, if the Commencement Date is January 1 and the written acknowledgement confirming the Commencement Date is dated January 14, Lessee shall send to the Lessor the rental payments for January 1 and February 1 by February 13. B. Lessee shall pay Lessor a late payment charge equal to five percent (5%) of the late payment for any payment not paid within ten (10) days after Lessee's receipt of written notice of such late payment. Any amounts not paid within ten (10) days after Lessee's receipt of written notice of such late payment shall bear interest until paid at the lesser of the rate of two percent (2%) per month or the highest rate permitted under Arizona law. C. Base Rent shalt be increased annually effective as of each anniversary of Commencement Date by an amount equal to three percent (3%) of the annual rent amount for the immediately preceding year. D. if this Lease is terminated at any other time other than on the last day of the month, Base Rent shall be prorated as of the date of termination and, in the event of termination for any reason other than nonpayment of Base Rent, all prepaid Base Rents shall be refunded to Lessee. Lessee may not add additional antennas other than those depicted on Exhibit A without the approval of Lessor. E. Lessee shall furnish and install an electrical sub-meter at the Premises for the measurement of electrical power used by Lessee's installation. In the event such sub-meter is installed, the Lessee shall pay the utility directly for its power consumption, if billed by the utility, and if not billed by the utility, then the Lessee shall pay the Lessor thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice from Lessor indicating the usage amount based upon Lessor's reading of the sub-meter. 3 In the event no meter or sub-meter has been installed, Lessee shall pay for its own power consumption used thirty (30) days after receipt of an invoice from Lessor indicating the usage amount. Lessee shall be permitted at any time during the Term, to install, maintain and/or provide access to and use of, as necessary (during any power interruption at the Premises), a temporary power source, and all related equipment and appurtenances within the Premises, or elsewhere on the Property in such locations as reasonably approved by Lessor. Lessee shall have the right to install conduits connecting the temporary power source and related appurtenances to the Premises. 4. EXTENSIONS: This Agreement shall automatically be extended for four (4) additional five (5) year terms unless Lessee terminates it at the end of the then current term by giving Lessor written notice of the intent to terminate at least six (6)months prior to the end of the then current term. 5. ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS. If at the end of the fourth (4th) five (5) year extension term this Agreement has not been terminated by either Party by giving to the other written notice of an intention to terminate it at least three (3) months prior to the end of such term, this Agreement shall continue in force upon the same covenants, terms and conditions for a further term of five (5) years and for five (5) year terms thereafter until terminated by either Party by giving to the other written notice of its intention to so terminate at least three (3) months prior to the end of such term. Annual rental for each such additional five (5) year term shall be equal to one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the annual rental payable with respect to the immediately preceding five (5) year term and all extensions shall be collectively referred to as the "Term." 6. USE AND GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS. A. Lessee shall use the Premises for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing and operating a communications facility and uses incidental thereto, and for the storage of related equipment in accordance with the terms of this Lease. This use shall be non-exclusive. Prior to Lessee's installation of its antennas on the Tower, Lessee shall provide to Lessor an inter-mod study verifying that Lessee's planned installation of antennas shalt not cause interference with any other lessees' equipment on the Tower existing as of the date of such inter-mod study. All improvements, equipment, antenna and conduits shall be at Lessee's expense and their installation shall be at the discretion and option of Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to replace, repair, add or otherwise modify its utilities, equipment, and/or conduits or any portion thereof and the frequencies over which the equipment operates, whether the equipment, conduits 4 or frequencies are specified or not on any exhibit attached hereto, during the Term. It is understood and agreed that Lessee's ability to use the Premises is contingent upon its obtaining after the execution date of this Agreement all of the certificates, permits and other approvals (collectively the "Governmental Approvals") that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authorities as well as satisfactory soil boring tests and structural analysis which will permit Lessee use of the Premises as set forth above. Lessor shall cooperate with Lessee in its effort to obtain such approvals and shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Property with respect to the proposed use thereof by Lessee. In the event that: (i) any of such applications for such Governmental Approvals should be finally rejected; (ii) any Governmental Approval issued to Lessee is canceled, expires, (apses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by governmental authority; (iii) Lessee determines that such Governmental Approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner; (iv) Lessee determines that any soil boring tests or structural analysis is unsatisfactory; (v) Lessee determines that the Premises is no longer technically or structurally compatible for its use, or (vi) Lessee, in its sole discretion, determines that it will be unable to use the Premises for its intended purposes, Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Agreement. Notice of Lessee's exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to Lessor in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be effective upon the mailing of such notice by Lessee, or upon such later date as designated by Lessee. All rentals paid to said termination date shall be retained by Lessor. Upon such termination, this Agreement shall be of no further force or effect except to the extent of the representations, warranties and indemnities made by each Party to the other hereunder. Otherwise, the Lessee shall have no further obligations for the payment of rent to Lessor. B. Lessee may update or replace antennas from time to time with the prior written approval of Lessor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, provided that the replacement antennas are: 1) not greater in number or size than the existing antennas; 2) that any change in their location on Tower is satisfactory to Lessor; and 3) such replacement antennas do not interfere with the antennas of other lessees of the Tower existing as of the date of such proposed update or replacement. Lessee shall submit to Lessor a detailed proposal for any such replacement antennas and any supplemental materials as may be reasonably requested, for Lessor's evaluation and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 5 7. INDEMNIFICATION. Subject to the provisions set forth below each Party shall indemnify and hold the other harmless against any claim of liability or loss from personal injury or property damage resulting from or arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnifying Party, its employees, contractors or agents, except to the extent such claims or damages may be due to or caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the other Party, or its employees, contractors or agents. 8. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE. A. Disclaimer of Liability: Lessor shall not at any time be liable for injury or damage occurring to any person or property from any cause whatsoever arising out of Lessee's construction, maintenance, repair, use, operation, construction or dismantling of Property or Lessee's Antenna Facilities, except to the extent that such claims or damages may be due to or cause by the negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor, or its employees, contractors or agents. B. Indemnification: Except as to the extent attributable to the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of Lessor, its employees or agents and independent contractors, Lessee shall at its sole cost and expense, indemnify and hold harmless Lessor and all associated, affiliated, allied and subsidiary entities of Lessor, now existing or hereinafter created, and their respective officers, boards, commissions, employees, agents, attorneys, and contractors (the "Indemnitees" collectively), from and against: a. Any and all liability, obligation, damages, penalties, claims, liens, costs, charges, losses and expenses, including without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses and consultants, which may be imposed upon, incurred by or be asserted against the Indemnitees by reason of act or omission of Lessee, its personnel, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, resulting in personal injury, bodily injury, sickness, disease or death to any person or damage to, loss of or destructive or tangible or intangible property, libel, slander, invasion of privacy and unauthorized use of any trademark, tradename, copyright, patent, service mark or any other right of any person, firm or corporation, which may arise out of or be in any way connected with the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, use or 6 A condition of the Premises or Lessee's Antenna Facilities or Lessee's failure to comply with any federal, state or local statute, ordinance or regulation; b. Any and all liabilities, obligations, damages,: penalties, claims, liens, costs, charges, losses and expenses, including without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses and other consultations, which are imposed upon, incurred by or asserted against Indemnitees by reason of any claim or lien arising, out of work, labor, materials or supplies provided or supplied to Lessee, its contractors or subcontractors, for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance or use of the Premises or Lessee's Antennae Facilities, and upon the written request of Lessor, Lessee shall cause such claim or lien covering Lessor's property to be discharged or bonded within thirty (30) calendar days following,such request; c. Any and all liability, obligation, damages, penalties, claims; liens, costs, charges, losses and expenses, including without limitation, reasonable attorney fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses and consultants, which may be imposed upon, incurred by or be asserted against Indemnitees by reason of any financing or securities offering by Lessee or its affiliates for violations of the common law or any laws, statutes, or regulations of the State of Arizona or United States, including those of the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, whether by Lessee or otherwise; d. This Paragraph shall survive the expiration or early termination of Lease. C. Assumption of Risk: Lessee undertakes and assumes for its officers, agents, .affiliates, contractors and subcontractors and employees (collectively "Lessee" for the purpose of this section), all risk of dangerous conditions, if any, on or about Property, except to the extent such conditions are caused by the acts or omissions of the Indemnitees. 7 D. Defense of Indemnitees: In the event any action or proceeding is brought against Indemnitees by reason of any matter for which Indemnitees are indemnified hereunder, Lessee shall upon notice from any Indemnitees, defend the same with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the Indemnitees; provided however, that Lessee shall not admit liability in any such matter on behalf of lndemnitees without the written consent of Lessor and provided further that Indemnitees shall not admit liability for, nor enter into any compromise or settlement of, any claim for which they are indemnified hereunder, without the prior written consent of Lessee. E. Notice, Cooperation and Expenses: Lessor shall give Lessee prompt notice of the making of any claim or the commencement of any action, suit or other proceeding which are only related to the provisions of this Lease. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prevent Lessor from cooperating with Lessee and participating in the defense of any litigation by Lessor's own counsel at Lessor's expense. Lessee shall pay all reasonable expenses incurred by Lessor in response to any such actions, suits or proceedings. These expenses shall include all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses such as reasonable attorney fees and shall also include the reasonable value of any services rendered by Lessor's attorney, and the actual reasonable expenses of Lessoor's agents, employees, expert witnesses and consultants, and reasonable disbursements and liabilities assumed by Lessor in connection with such suits, actions or proceedings but shall not include attorney fees for services that are unnecessarily duplicative services provided by Lessee. if Lessee requests Lessor to assist it in such defense then Lessee shalt pay all reasonable expenses incurred by Lessor in response thereto, including defending itself with regard to any such actions, suits or proceedings. These expenses shall include all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses such as reasonable attorney fees and shall also include the reasonable costs of any services rendered by Lessor's attorney, and the actual reasonable expenses of Lessor's agents, employees, expert witnesses and consultants, disbursements and liabilities assumed by Lessor in connection with such suits, actions or proceedings. F. insurance: During the term of the Lease, Lessee shall maintain, or cause to be maintained, in full force and effect and at its sole cost and expense, the following types and limits of insurance: 8 a. Worker's Compensation insurance meeting applicable statutory requirement and employer's liability insurance with minimum limits of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for each accident. b. Comprehensive commercial general liability insurance with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) as the combined single limit for each occurrence of bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) Aggregate. The policy shall provide blanket contractual Liability insurance for this Lease, and shall include coverage for products and completed operations liability, independent contractor's liability; coverage for property damage from perils of explosion, collapse or damage to underground utilities, commonly known as "XCU" coverage. c. Automobile liability insurance covering all owned, hired, and nonowned vehicles in use by Lessee, its employees and agents, with personal protection insurance and property protection insurance to comply with the provisions of state law with minimum limits of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) as the combined single limit for each occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. d. At the start of and during the period of any construction, builders all-risk insurance, together with an installation floater or equivalent property coverage covering cables, materials, machinery and supplies of any nature whatsoever which are to be used in or incidental to the installation of Antenna Facilities. Upon completion of the installation of Antenna Facilities, Lessee shall substitute for the foregoing insurance policies of fire, extended coverage and vandalism and malicious mischief insurance on Antenna Facilities. The amount of insurance at all times shall be representative of the insurable values installed or constructed. e. Business interruption insurance coverage in an amount sufficient to cover such loss of revenues, for the period of time which it would take, under normal circumstances, to repair or replace that 9 part(s) of Antenna Facilities which is damaged and caused the toss of revenue. f. Ail policies shall be written on an occurrence and not on a claims made basis. g. The coverage amounts set forth above may be met by a combination of underlying and umbrella policies so long as in combination the limits equal or exceed those stated. G. Named. Insureds: All general and automobile liability policies shall name Lessor and all associated, affiliated; allied and subsidiary entities of Lessor, now existing or hereafter created, and their respective officers, boards, commissions, employees, agents, and contractors, as their respective interests may appear as the "Additional Insureds". Each policy that shalt add Additional insureds hereunder, shall contain cross liability wording, to the effect: "in the event of a claim being made hereunder by one insured for which another is or may be liable, then this policy shall cover such insured against whom a claim is or may be made in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured hereunder subject to the policy limits.„ H. Evidence of Insurance: A copy of each Certificate of Insurance containing no disclaimer, or a certified copy of the policy reasonably acceptable to Lessor and designation those individuals and governmental bodies referenced above as Additional insureds shall be filed with Lessor prior to any installation of Antenna Facilities to Tower, as well as evidence of payment of required premiums. Lessee shall file such documentation annually with Lessor in the Office of the City Clerk. The certificates shall contain a provision that coverage is supported in the amounts specified herein and that the policy will not be canceled during the term of this Lease without at least thirty (30) days notice. The form of the certificates of insurance shall comply with the terms of this Lease, and shall be issued and delivered to: City of Apache Junction, 300 East Superstition Boulevard, Apache Junction, AZ 85219, Attn: Richard J. Stern, City Attorney. 10 Lessee's insurance program maintained pursuant to this Lease shall contain the following feature: At least thirty (30)calendar days prior written notice shall be given to Lessor by the Insured or broker of any intention to cancel the same, such notice to be given by mail to the parties named in the Lease." 1. Insurance Companies: All insurance shall be effected under valid and enforceable policies, insured by insurers licensed to do business in the State of Arizona or surplus line carriers on the State of Arizona Insurance Commissioner's approved [ist of companies qualified to do business in the State of Arizona. J. Deductibles: Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Lessor, the lndemnitees and Additional Insureds from and against the payment of any deductible and from the payment of any premiums on any insurance policy required to be furnished by this Lease. K. Contractors: Lessee shall require that each contractor and subcontractor who perform work on the Property carry, in full force and effect, worker's compensation, comprehensive public liability and automobile liability insurance coverage of the type which Lessee is required to obtain under the terms of this Paragraph. L. Review of Limits: Once during each calendar year during the term of this Lease, Lessor may review the insurance coverage to be carried by Lessee. If Lessor reasonably determines that reasonably higher limits of coverage are necessary to protect the interests of Lessor or the Additional Insureds, Lessee shall be so notified and shall obtain such reasonable additional limits of insurance, at its sole cost and expense. 9. ANNUAL TERMINATION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, provided LESSEE is not in default hereunder beyond applicable notice and cure periods, LESSEE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon the annual anniversary of the Commencement Date provided that three (3) months prior notice is given to Lessor. 10. TOWER COMPLIANCE. Lessor covenants that it will keep the Tower in good repair as required by all federal, state and local laws. Lessor shall also comply with all rules and regulations enforced by the Federal Communications 11 Commission with regard to the lighting, marking and painting of towers. If Lessor fails to make such repairs, including maintenance, Lessee may make the repairs and the costs thereof shall be payable to Lessee by Lessor on demand. If Lessor does not make payment to Lessee within ten (10) days after such demand, Lessee shall have the right to deduct the costs of the repairs from the succeeding monthly rental amounts normally due from Lessee to Lessor. No materials may be used in the installation of the antennas or transmission lines that will cause corrosion or rust or deterioration of the Tower structure or its appurtenances. Lessee's antennas on the Tower must be identified by a marking fastened securely to its bracket on the Tower and all transmission lines are to be tagged at the conduit opening where it enters any users equipment space. Lessee's antennas shall be painted, at Lessee's expense, the color the Lessor specifies at the time of construction and maintained by Lessee throughout the Lease term. Lessor may specify a change in color from time to time and require Lessee to paint its antennas that new color, so long as the paint does not interfere with Lessee's use of the antennas and is non-metallic. Lessee shall, at its own expense, maintain any equipment on or attached to the Tower or that is part of Lessee's Premises in a safe condition, in good repair and in a manner suitable to Lessor in Lessor's reasonable discretion so as not to conflict with the use of or other teasing of the Tower by Lessor. Lessee shall have sole responsibility for the maintenance, repair and security of its equipment, personal property, Antenna Facilities and leasehold improvements, and shall keep the same in good repair and condition during the Lease term. Lessee shall keep its Premises free of debris and anything of a dangerous, noxious or offensive nature which would create a hazard or undue vibration, heat, noise or interference; provided, however, Lessee's use as permitted under this Lease shall be deemed not to be dangerous, noxious or offensive to create a hazard, undue vibration, heat, noise or interference. In the event Lessor or any other Lessee undertakes painting, construction or other alteration on Tower, Lessor and Lessee shall each take reasonable measures at Lessor's and Lessee's own costs to insure Lessor's and Lessee's equipment, personal property, Antenna Facilities or personnel and protect such from paint and debris fallout which may occur during the painting, construction or alteration process. 11. INTERFERENCE A. Lessee's installation, operation and maintenance of its Antenna Facilities shall not interfere in any way with the existing lessee(s) located on the monopole as of the date of this Lease, as shown in Exhibit A. Lessee agrees to cease all such interference which materially interferes with the use of existing lessee(s) immediately 12 upon notice from Lessor to the extent such interference is caused by Lessee's Antenna Facilities. B. Lessee, prior to installation, will provide any non-privileged, non- confidential technical and appropriate information to Lessor and Lessor's lessee(s) existing as of the date of this Lease in order to insure that what is proposed will not cause interference once installed. C. The procedures of this section shall govern in Lessor's review of future requests of potential iessee(s). If Lessor receives such request, Lessor shall submit a proposal complete with all technical specifications reasonably requested by Lessee to Lessee for review for specifications or information claimed to be of a proprietary nature by the third party. The third party shall be responsible for the reasonable cost of preparing the technical specifications for its proposed transmission facility. Lessee shall have thirty (30) calendar days following receipt of said proposal to make any objections thereto, and failure to make any objection within said thirty (30) calendar day period shall be deemed consent by Lessee to the installation of antennas or transmission facilities pursuant to said proposal. if Lessee gives notice of objection due to interference during such thirty (30) calendar day period and Lessee's objections are verified by Lessor to be valid, Lessor shall not proceed with such proposal unless Lessor modifies the proposal in such a manner determined in Lessor's reasonable judgment, to eliminate. interference. In that case, Lessor may proceed with the proposal. D. As provided in Paragraph 6 (A) of this Lease, prior to installation of its antennas on the Tower, Lessee will complete an inter-mod study verifying that Lessee's planned installation of antennas shall not cause interference with any other lessees' equipment on the Tower existing as of the date of such inter-mod study_ Lessee's use and operation of its facilities shall not interfere with the use and operation of other communication facilities on the Tower which pre- existed the installation of Lessee's Antenna Facilities. If Lessee's facilities cause interference, Lessee shall take all measures reasonably necessary to correct and eliminate the interference. If the interference cannot be eliminated in a reasonable time, Lessee shall immediately cease operating the interfering equipment until the 13 interference has been eliminated. if the interference cannot be eliminated within thirty (30) calendar days, Lessor may terminate Lease. 12. REMOVAL AT END OF TERM. Lessee shall, upon expiration of the Term, or within ninety (90) days after any earlier termination of the Agreement, remove its building(s), antenna(s), equipment, conduits, fixtures and all personal property and restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear and casualty damage excepted. Lessor agrees and acknowledges that all of the equipment, conduits, fixtures and personal property of Lessee shall remain the personal property of Lessee and Lessee shalt have the right to remove the same at any time during the Term, whether or not said items are considered fixtures and attachments to real property under applicable Laws. If such time for removal causes Lessee to remain on the Premises after termination of this Agreement, Lessee shall pay rent at the then existing monthly rate or on the existing monthly pro-rata basis if based upon a longer payment term, until such time as the removal of the building, antenna structure, fixtures and all personal property are completed. 13. HOLDOVER. Lessee has no right to retain possession of the Premises or any part thereof beyond the expiration of that removal period set forth in Paragraph 13 herein, unless the Parties are negotiating a new lease or lease extension in good faith. In the event that the Parties are not in the process of negotiating a new lease or lease extension in good faith, LESSEE holds over in violation of this Lease then the rent then in effect payable from and after the time of the expiration or earlier removal period set forth in this Lease shall be increased to one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the rent applicable during the month immediately preceding such expiration or earlier termination. 14. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. If Lessor elects, during the Term: (i) to sell or otherwise transfer all or any portion of the Property, whether separately or as part of a larger parcel of which the Property is a part, or (ii) grant to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to that portion of the Tower and or Property occupied by Lessee, or a larger portion thereof, for the purpose of operating and maintaining communications facilities or the management thereof, with or without an assignment of this Agreement to such third party, Lessee shall have the right of first refusal to meet any bona fide offer of sale or transfer on the same terms and conditions of such offer. If Lessee fails to meet such bona fide offer within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof from Lessor, Lessor may sell or grant the easement or interest in the 14 Property or portion thereof to such third person in accordance with the terms and conditions of such third party offer. For purposes of this Paragraph, any transfer, bequest or devise of Lessor's interest in the Property as a result of the death of Lessor, whether by will or intestate succession, shall not be considered a sale of the Property for which Lessee has any right of first refusal. 15. RIGHTS UPON SALE. Should Lessor, at any time during the Term decide: (i) to sell or transfer all or any part of the Property or the Tower thereon to a purchaser other than Lessee; or (ii) to grant to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to that portion of the Tower and or Property occupied by Lessee, or a larger portion thereof, for the purpose of operating and maintaining communications facilities or the management thereof, such sale or grant of an easement or interest therein shall be under and subject to this Lease and any such purchaser or transferee shall recognize Lessee's rights hereunder under the terms of this Lease. To the extent that Lessor grants to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to that portion of the Tower and/or Property occupied by Lessee for the purpose of operating and maintaining communications facilities or the management thereof and in conjunction therewith, assigns this Lease to said third party, Lessor shall not be released from its obligations to Lessee under this Lease, and Lessee shall have the right to look to Lessor and the third party for the full performance of this Lease. 16. QUIET ENJOYMENT. Lessor covenants that Lessee, on paying the rent and performing the covenants herein, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. 17. TITLE. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee as of the execution date of this Lease, and covenants during the Term that Lessor is seized of good and sufficient title and interest to the Property and has full authority to enter into and execute this Lease. Lessor further covenants during the Term that there are no liens, judgments or impediments of title on the Property, or affecting Lessor's title to the same and that there are no covenants, easements or restrictions which prevent or adversely affect the use or occupancy of the Premises by Lessee as set forth above. 18. INTEGRATION. it is agreed and understood that this Lease contains all agreements, promises and understandings between Lessor and Lessee and that no verbal or oral agreements, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either Lessor or Lessee in any dispute, controversy or proceeding at law, and any addition, variation or modification to this Lease shall be void and ineffective 15 unless made in writing signed by the Parties. In the event any provision of the Lease is found to be invalid or unenforceable, such finding shalt not affect the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Lease. The failure of either Party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Lease or to exercise any of its rights under the Lease shall not waive such rights and such Party shall have the right to enforce such rights at any time and take such action as may be lawful and authorized under this Lease, in taw or in equity. 19. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement and the performance thereof shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of Pinal County of the State of Arizona. The parties agree to Pima! County as the County with the applicable venue, unless a federal right or law is at issue, in which case the Federal District Court of Arizona will have jurisdiction and shall be the appropriate venue. 20. ASSIGNMENT. This Lease may be sold, assigned or transferred by the Lessee without any approval or consent of the Lessor to the Lessee's principal, affiliates, subsidiaries of its principal or to any entity which acquires all or substantially all of Lessee's assets in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Property is located by reason of a merger, acquisition or other business reorganization. As to other parties, this Lease may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the written consent of the Lessor, which such consent will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. No change of stock ownership or control of Lessee shall constitute an assignment hereunder. 21. SUBORDINATION TO MORTGAGE. Any mortgage now or subsequently placed upon any part of the Property of which the Premises are a part shall be deemed to be prior in time and senior to the rights of Lessee under this Lease; provided, however, as a condition precedent to being required to subordinate its interest to any present or future mortgage or security interest encumbering the Property or the Premises, Lessor shall obtain on behalf of Lessee a non- disturbance and attornment agreement for Lessee's benefit that shall recognize Lessee's right to operate its Antenna Facilities, remain in occupancy and have access to the Premises as long as Lessee is not in default under this Lease beyond applicable notice and cure periods. Subject to the foregoing, Lessee subordinates all of its interest in the leasehold estate created by Lease to the lien of any such mortgage. Lessee shall at Lessor's request, execute any commercially reasonable additional documents necessary to indicate this subordination. 16 22. NOTICES. Atl notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service and provided further that it guarantees delivery to the addressee by the end of the next business day following the courier's receipt from the sender, addressed as follows (or any other address that the Party to be notified may have designated to the sender by like notice): LESSOR: City of Apache Junction City Manager 300 E. Superstition Blvd. Apache Junction, AZ 85219 And to: City Attorney 300 E. Superstition Blvd. Apache Junction, AZ 85219 LESSEE; Gila River Cellular General Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 Attention: Network Real Estate Site Name: PHO Plank Notice shall be effective upon actual receipt or refusal as shown on the receipt obtained pursuant to the foregoing. 23. SUCCESSORS. This Agreement shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representative, successors and assigns of the Parties hereto. 24. DEFAULT AND LESSOR'S REMEDIES. A. It shalt be a default if Lessee fails to pay rent or any other sum when due, and does not cure such default within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of written notice of such late payment; or if Lessee fails to perform any other covenant or condition of this Lease and does not cure such other action within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of written notice from Lessor specifying the default or inadequacy complained of; provided, however, Lessee shall not 17 unreasonably withhold, condition or delay its consent to an extension of such thirty (30) day cure period upon receipt of written request from Lessee if the nature of the cure takes more than thirty (30) days and Lessee commences the cure within such thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently and continuously pursues the cure to completion ; or if Lessee abandons or vacates the Property; or if Lessee is adjudicated as bankrupt or makes any assignment for the benefit of creditors; or if Lessee becomes insolvent. B. In the event of default by Lessee, Lessor shall have the right at its option, in addition and not exclusive of any other remedy Lessor may have by operation of law, without any further demand or notice, to enter the Property and eject all persons therefrom, and either: a. declare the Lease has terminated, in which event Lessee shall immediately remove the Antennae Facilities and pay Lessor a sum of money equal to the total of: (i) the amount of the unpaid rent accrued through the date of termination; (ii) the amount by which the unpaid rent reserved for the balance of the term exceeds the amount of such rental loss that the Lessee proves could be reasonably avoided (net of costs of such reletting); and (iii) any other amount reasonably necessary to compensate Lessor for all losses proximately caused by Lessee's failure to perform its obligations under the Lease, or b. without terminating the Lease, retet the Premises or any portion thereof for the account of Lessee upon such terms and conditions as Lessor may deem advisable, and any monies received from such reletting shall be applied first to the expense of such reletting and collection, including reasonable attorney fees, any real estate commissions paid, and thereafter toward payment of all sums due or to become due to Lessor hereunder, and if sufficient sums shall not be thus realized to pay such sums and other charges, Lessee shall pay Lessor any deficiency monthly, notwithstanding that Lessor may have received rental in excess of the rental stipulated in this Lease in previous or subsequent months, and Lessor may bring an action therefore as such monthly deficiency shall arise. C. In the event of a default by Lessee, no reentry and taking of possession of the Premises by Lessor shall be construed as an election 18 on Lessor's part to terminate the Lease, regardless of the extent of renovations and alterations by Lessor, unless a written notice of such intention is given to Lessee by Lessor. Notwithstanding any reletting without termination, Lessor may at anytime thereafter elect to terminate the Lease for such previous breach. D. In the event of a default by Lessee, if suit shall be brought by Lessor for recovery of possession of the Premises, for the recovery of any rent.or any other amounts due under the provisions of this Lease, or because of the breach .of any other covenant by Lessee, Lessee shall pay to Lessor all reasonable expenses incurred thereof including reasonable attorney fees. 25. CURE BY LESSOR. In the event of any default of this Lease by Lessee, Lessor may at anytime after written notice and expiration of applicable cure periods, cure the default for the account of and at the expense of Lessee. If Lessor is compelled to pay or elects to pay any sum of money or to do any act which will require the payment of any sum of money or is compelled to incur any expense, including reasonable attorney fees in instituting, prosecuting or defending any action to enforce Lessor's rights under this Agreement, the sums so paid by Lessor, with all interest, costs, and damages shall be deemed to be Additional Rental and shall be due from Lessee to Lessor on the first day of the month following the incurring of the respective expenses. 26. OPTIONAL TERMINATION. This Lease may be terminated, without penalty or further liability, as follows: A. by either Party on thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice, if the other Party remains in default after the applicable cure periods; B. by Lessee on sixty (60) calendar days prior written notice if Lessee determines that interference by or to Lessee's use of the Property cannot be resolved; C. by Lessee immediately upon notice, if destruction or damage to the Property or the taking thereof (by partial condemnation or otherwise) is sufficient, to adversely affect Lessee's use of the Property; D. by Lessee immediately upon notice, if Lessee determines, in its sole discretion, due to the title results, survey results or tests, that the 19 condition of the Property is unsatisfactory or Lessee believes that the teasing or continued leasing of the Property would expose Lessee to undue risks of government action or intervention or third-party liability. E. by Lessor if Lessor determines in its reasonable discretion that the Tower is structurally unsound, including but not limited to consideration of age of the structure, damage or destruction of all or part of the Tower from any source, or factors relating to condition of the Tower; or if ordered to remove the Tower from service by any federal or state governmental,unit for any reason; F. by Lessor if a qualified, degreed and/or licensed professional is able to categorically prove that continued use of Tower by Lessee is in fact a threat to health, safety or welfare or violates applicable laws or ordinances. Upon termination of this Lease for any reason, Lessee shall remove its equipment, personal property, Antenna Facilities, and leasehold improvements from Property within ninety (90) calendar days of the date of termination, and shall repair any damage to Property caused by such equipment, normal wear and tear excepted, all at Lessee's sole cost and expense. Any such property or facilities which are not removed by the end of the Lease term shall become the property of Lessor. 27. ALTERATION, DAMAGES, OR DESTRUCTION. if the Tower or any portion thereof is altered, destroyed or damaged so as to materially hinder effective use of the Antenna Facilities through no fault or negligence of Lessee, Lessee may elect to terminate this Lease upon thirty (30) calendar days' written notice to Lessor. In such event, Lessee shall promptly remove the Antennae Facilities from the Property and shall restore the Property to the same conditions as existed prior to the Lease. The Lease (and Lessee's obligations to pay rent) shall terminate upon Lessee's fulfillment of the obligations set forth in the preceding sentence, at which termination Lessee shall have no obligation to repair any damage to any portion of Property. 28. ENVIRONMENTAL. Lessee represents and warrants that its use of Property will not generate any hazardous substance, and it will not store or dispose on Property nor transport to or over Property any hazardous substance with the exception of cleaning solvents and materials commonly used in the operation of communications facilities in compliance with all applicable laws. 20 Subject to the foregoing, Lessee represents and warrants that Lessee will not, and will not permit any third party on the Property on behalf of Lessee to use, generate, store or dispose of any hazardous substance on the Premises. Lessee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Lessor, Lessor's partners, affiliates, agents and employees against any losses, liabilities, claims and/or costs (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) arising from any breach of any representation or warranty made by Lessee and contained in this Paragraph, except to the extent such tosses, liabilities, claims and/or costs (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) arise out of the acts or omissions of Lessor, its partners, affiliates, agents or employees. "Hazardous Substance" means any substance or material defined or designated as a hazardous or toxic waste, hazardous or toxic material, hazardous or toxic or radioactive substance, or other similar term by any federal, stater or local environmental law, regulation or rule presently in effect or promulgated in the future, as such laws, regulations or rules may be amended from time to time; and shall also include but not be limited to any substance which after release into the environment will or may reasonably be anticipated to cause sickness, death or disease. 29. CASUALTY. In the event of damage by fire or other casualty to the Tower or Premises that cannot reasonably be expected to be repaired within forty-five (45) days following same or, if the Property is damaged by fire or other casualty so that such damage may reasonably be expected to disrupt Lessees operations at the Property for more than forty-five (45) days, then Lessee may, at any time following such fire or other casualty, provided Lessor has not completed the restoration required to permit Lessee to resume its operation at the Property, terminate this Lease upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to Lessor. Any such notice of termination shall cause this Lease to expire with the same force and effect as though the date set forth in such notice were the date originally set as the expiration date of this Lease and the Parties shall make an appropriate adjustment, as of such termination date, with respect to payments due to the other under this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rent shall abate during the period of repair following such fire or other casualty in proportion to the. degree to which Lessee's use of the Property is impaired. 30. SUBMISSION OF AGREEMENT/PARTIAL INVALIDITY/AUTHORITY. The submission of this Agreement for examination does not constitute an offer to lease the Premises and this Agreement becomes effective only upon the full execution of this Agreement by the Parties. if any provision herein is invalid, it shall be considered deleted from this Agreement and shall not invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement. Each of the Parties hereto warrants to the other that 21 the person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of such Party has the full right, power and authority to enter into and execute this Agreement on such Party's behalf and that no consent from any other person or entity is necessary as a condition precedent to the legal effect of this Agreement. 31. APPLICABLE LAWS. During the Term, Lessor shall maintain the Property and all structural elements of the Premises in compliance with all applicable taws, rules, regulations, ordinances, directives, covenants, easements, zoning and land use regulations, and restrictions of record, permits, building codes, and the requirements of any applicable fire insurance underwriter or rating bureau, now in effect or which may hereafter come into effect (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act and laws regulating hazardous substances) (collectively "Laws"). Lessee shall, in respect to the condition of the Premises and at Lessee's sole cost and expense, comply with (a) all Laws relating solely to Lessee's specific and unique nature of use of the Premises (other than general office use); and (b) all building codes requiring modifications to the Premises due to the improvements being made by Lessee in the Premises. 32. SURVIVAL. The provisions of the Agreement relating to indemnification from one Party to the other Party shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. Additionally, any provisions of this Agreement which require performance subsequent to the termination or expiration of this Agreement shall also survive such termination or expiration. 33. CAPTIONS. The captions contained in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and are not intended to be part of the Agreement. They shalt not affect or be utilized in the construction or interpretation of the Agreement. 34. SECURITY DEPOSIT. On or before December 15, 2006, Lessee shall deposit with Lessor the sum of Three Thousand and 001100 Dollars ($3,000.00) as a security deposit, which shall be held by Lessor without liability for interest, as security for the faithful performance by Lessee of all of the terms, covenants and conditions of Lease to be kept and performed by Lessee during the Term hereof. 35. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE. Lessee shall at any time and from time to time upon not less than twenty (20) calendar days prior request by Lessor, deliver to Lessor a statement in writing certifying that: (a) the Lease is unmodified and in full force; (b) the dates to which rent and other charges have been paid; (c) so far as the person making the certificate knows, Lessor is not in default under any provisions of Lease; and (d) such other matters as Lessor may reasonably request. 22 36. NON-WAIVER, Failure of Lessor to insist on strict performance of any of the its rights hereunder shalt not waive such rights, but Lessor shall have the right to enforce such rights at any time and take such action as might be lawful or authorized hereunder, either in law or equity. The receipt of any sum paid by Lessee to Lessor after a breach of this Lease shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach unless expressly set forth in writing. 37. TAXES, LICENSES AND FEES. Lessee shaft pay all real and personal property taxes and assessments for the Premises specifically related to Lessee's particular use under this Lease, if any, which become due and payable during the term of Lease. All such payments shall be made, and evidence of all such payments shall be provided to Lessor, within thirty (30) days after the date of such payment. Lessee shall pay all taxes on its personal property located on the Property. in addition, Lessee shall indemnify Lessor from any and all liability, obligation, damages, penalties, claims liens, costs, charges, losses and expenses, including without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses and consultants; which may be imposed upon, incurred by or be asserted against Lessee in relation to the non-payment of taxes owed or assessed on the Premises. Lessee shall obtain and pay for all applicable fees and charges, taxes and expenses required for licenses and/or permits required for or occasioned by Lessee's particular use of the Premises during the term of this Lease or during any renewed term. This shall include, but not be limited to, a City of Apache Junction Business License from the City Clerk's Office and a state transaction privilege tax license. 38. MISCELLANEOUS: A. Authority to Contract: Lessor and Lessee represent that each, respectively, has full right, power, and authority to execute Lease. B. Excusable Delays: Lessor and Lessee shalt exert all efforts to perform their respective responsibilities under Lease. However, neither Lessor nor Lessee shall be held responsible for inability to render timely performance if such inability is a direct result of a force beyond their control, including: strikes, embargoes, failure of carriers, inability to obtain transportation facilities, and Acts of God , the public enemy, or terrorist acts. C. Amendment: It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of the terms and conditions of Lease shall be valid unless 23 made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and that oral understandings or agreements not incorporated herein shall not be binding on the parties. D. Severability: If any part, term or provision of Lease shall be held illegal, unenforceable or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining portions and provisions hereof shall not be affected. F. Governing Law and Venue: The terms and conditions of the Lease shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona. Any action at law or in equity brought by either party for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for in the Lease, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in Pinal County, State of Arizona. The parties hereby waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceeding to any other county. in the event either party shall bring suit to enforce any term of the Lease or to recover any damages for and on account of the breach of any term or condition in the Lease, it is mutually agreed that the prevailing party in such action shall recover all costs including reasonable attorneys' fees to be determined by the court in such action. F. Conflicts of Interest: The provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated S 38-511 relating to cancellation of contracts due to conflicts of interest shall apply to this Lease. [Signatures Appear on the Following Page] 24 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written. LESSEE: Gila River Cellular General Partnership, an Arizona general ,� partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: Celico Partnership Its: Man ging General Partner � By: l0.--Lahet:CC Name: Keith A. Surratt Its: West Area Vice President-Network LESSOR: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, an Arizona municipal cor oration By: 1 frj-"PefrSt- 4--"`----------- Name: Doug Coleman Its: Mayor ATTEST: / 2C 2.,,•�'--•It-j- 6X Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk ff APPROVED AS TO FORM: gilA' E6 ' Richard J. Stern, City Attorney 25 EXHIBIT A Description. and Depiction of Premises ININamini SITE PHOTO . Ilbfa 1wire►ess • 1 F KUL • i1 I f i . • VE'/� /'�1NlC'��GSS y�l� fa.in Il��d� l MMO nN1214 S.IKh-[pM.a PG. bA 1...Y5cw<.td....o1 128-7 01 I SITE NAME: mama Lo PHO PLANK II . _____ INDEX OF DRAWINGS 11 PROJECT TEAM 11 PROJECT SUMMARY ((VICINITY MAP I LO'°1M"'a'lir""" 91 I. 006 fon CUNT ru=.•COMMA MALL MN=fllc to iu�r c� UM wmriv KW 'km owc wwu� art IUElal WMI.O M NC Wen. lfl4c A[awmTliS uF 011 0M) tr..ww Vluln op..d a lawurla.n Run 0.4vWt6M1 mNa1Na rn 5K lwnnlr ra aw 4WSIC-1.oNS uz(oat wn+nl, tr.. M.Mw 1G r r-. OK/u. IMV E06 OR. SOT M01,6WI 141.Malmo re. M.•••=i•o s It �r l� o.. co 51a Pw1 WWE C ..AZ. WI SIl(E WORM nIi•.Ws..d..l►1.w. RIME NIR 0MJal 6-7 VIE Mcwme OMB .,, CrIMO wom 4au wrRnun sMwMac ��y ,�. i 014NMr M(C76'41.MO MVO.MUMS.Dafz @ lypM�� @ r S 1*0crrr I Row Raw MI.NIMNIA+al as�i 101*0 ua Iu $AIVO "''} MMIACF.wort POIML AIL OM Ell-'On .1 PN.44 IS/REigm 6Y 06.6174111.1101. MI/, ARCH)TECTI ENGINEER 121V16 A 14I It.It MIFI..eulm. E�aw m1�a�i.l�i ,1NM+mw PL t LEGAL DESCRIPTION I ; 'ca.>i 4. 1 NM 16&I MF pycAplE�HTWEl ` BUILDING DATA '1 DRIVING DIRECTIONS a0D115051 01N00°M'Mf1E Sao , [0115 o.R a nv 16AME Mi1MOM MIMMS DRAWING SYMBOLS } rNrm 641-6ML 00lMYCR W.M.Maw(WI)Mons wa u6 w Fh51 la V. MIO M M61.oar 1O1H a I. sas-sva ncaouM W.A. WA M MMr NO /�a/�P�.u you o0 NAL 0041*au. SITE NAME: SWWEYOR .fAME.4MPIMR K/saE aprasi ablMl K ew/O m HO YFUNMaI KM VW1Ra1' OM M1 +nmMmE ��WppI'�OrffpWain.5111c.w PHO PLANK II ® 6051E b4M11.O. I1FOM6 KOM 66M NM Bak,WWI rot snot 071M.t:W l COW 11AZ 1.1Lc am If am M•.a Ece sc.a ' II / 1+60)u.-aw APAC11ENJUNNC1IOND .Az 1rao.*a ® 'r POWEP.COMPMRI go..ma reset M/F 2wnwr uslzl) 85219Pomo i w IMIIIIMUMMIIIMIll 5 APP..1M ./......".. N ME 16017 2I64166 EOMO ul...TAM I M/E If0....M1 c.mq nwcu.uc TELEPHONE 7111E SHEET w1M16x lun.o —M—•l--- .6n1 WO/DMV O. A floe 1p6W m.sN Malrx lllYS —[—t-- an 4000 -..--r---.r.--- i To t . AI I ' 1111M1.1111111 ____ K 0mI hAa Of OC g K.,0110.O K swim.; i' `,`-S oaala 75 taro e.I r>d r.a1n°Yc Y 4.-a I y�f MBNw Yc+ 1 It%GDR �1-�AlCVP4CY CF.BIUlCA1UIN 'f I IOC r0,tw.- ,;Naatt Wrtz6Me➢NS. ILD i41tlMl 4.R UO YPIWM./W/t<VWrY. aD LwouM Ar IK MYra a f. APH: 100-01-000A 1 I uclw rAus rwY qmr py far.MW I�+AWENEIigygOBOWIDSi[ � YI`�"�'� Prwaaa prwel)a➢(a.Yrw..� { + 1�fAARW er�rrsl wu or ncg awusr e.rr,eal 1 ;NSA.FOIL Amw MOM l>)rat r°ir"Ymw w12 Wr or➢¢O4 im vaTor.: i • ICRrfAA.Rv.E ODurIIW N11w.IXw.rm . , ; IewaaaYC•r K,a M 451 cave>1r ( I Dai,gaa® a 00.1 a awcs is 1NiR it]rmaq .. yy I rs IK Ras,]tar 1rt➢ _ ;I .. LdrO O YaOPIX[ Da11M a...COOL Ouei� np{O[RWM W OrW119 N NLIWf n Ef.. � LA➢tWW aY a'vb1T ROhM U➢➢6 Jr 1i iCQ1'NAM /VlI g 1MG Ln SIcuwV+L.avr rut q ;Wa.v YIa..lir 1f M00i AEsr, L.00.OE sr a1.lri Mr 1:.. I ELEV..MIA {➢Awp°) {Ik AIOI MCI 04..4 . ➢..Wi.a Orris].fr..V a.r.fYi•21. - , r➢P.]01w w MOMS a OPYR.SWMSIE ! EASE zI.r1 rak K11lE CODMa IX01E5MYW YAWLS I1 YOYaf wrl l0]] � !, , I tj!A` 1 1 /-/'/lI I ➢�iKW r:alw Ws wuas N wMU 1]lsai6 1 K.--alr.-7_ I II III 1 I I I ✓ BWS,710ASI far m K 9a11 Q ateo'Fa a 1�Di:Wl4r.MYr ap�.�rY.Dr.(W�,,= _Y;.r,.�1OI'r MOMW iW OIOt10O, [CmraP I ]rr}4\ ASNW.cPABrY`AS Lac l Yawwu]CAA:1 1.100.YD O(T tliR WEM➢ I:`\`\ � Ar rr.i Mum.Arm,..RDRD A lA.a Dar RIX I. aclni'Ig]u aiw-ra I I ! I l l s I I I l l ik�SWrP 1 A A4FR MO YW1[L L➢AG r➢O Qr P,fA0 151.�.,�.,.� OW a➢Y 1uwrYc MCA..faloRRr 1 VOLlaZEIMIUMMZEMMIN ACg1a/YIaR\\ <0.0.4 Al OC 100066r WV.Or.0 WOW N; I nit 2ASOat \e aotW M1N a awn if OWES]I f[caw 10r AlD]I -61 \\ A. ➢t 0ar ur MM.0st]I fKh a F \ bi 1 \�\ 0.i o a 4.5 NORM YCO 4.04 ME1h r�°x usl I s- .0 °14o.1Y a Drams a lwnu u]raof LASE Isss } a QQ% M. 10.01 1 IMO .(Ya W Dry®.]YAWLS i,aD Dr I n31.WA no m ME MAT.1r,aY.R c 1I �.�5. E�y �• I.I I N�]efr°AIAM rrR 1 I YP 7� 100 AK WSM • 1`-�- rAaWR rRWDYe it OY i„HULA.. 1 1140.°WYlnlbt Off a"AM t19RVOr]6r.WO>D I l}1 I {)11 11�'�' r! ri01B4 WY ARM 1 i AMU.CAPCr . 1 1 11 I 11 r I b i I i i i I;: { u NSi.nee Mr 10 Oil MO O IW... I I mIm U( I Q �WR L65af MOWN ,tW1MlPB/WWrwiW� IL -.' f1WQ. - ' VOL Nero. •DaBWWTr 10A YNWAY WO } �/ �) rilLlig ] III_I ( I _-_� u - .rrftlRP`L �Y ila si I Id ��.ir M.¢WAORD B p) L �LAl / I , �, I 1110B/1M �D.,.sr Yoalilt Y 8 -- 1 1*5*0' -- - .-�- I worm 190tlYA16 MOO. PXU,ECr - Star aiap 'K l I .. Wrpo. ar+A, _ / { �� Wtl L PP .q~r sY~MwWN ➢IOR➢ODr 0.b IBIT1ll .,,a• _ j �• „1��ON M I a ° I Cs abt�r. I I Ir_ �_ 0 ; Gf46 l K N 1.M1 r0➢E OAIp M IrG On EOM �� DAND OD.ARWIt r-]YWIS le PM W. _ • C.54.].SA 11,1 aa.WON Or OWG A0.No f i 1°r'a BWLPI.V j ! siiiiii �_ :fin _ T - _ fI elAearxA �R wirrInframilin-rai i I's ✓� eosl�u]I,mc _� --.- ♦ ♦ ♦ iy�`ir•'.7l..; °F awlo ' � Y�+.sDmriuxc i I �' �_ MArORM ( 1 1 YLf f10K0 MI.,a[R 4➢�fUl US mu-pA ws.] I I _' '- Saud mi un ■cEq"i1JIti11 I ilAt vwW Ns1l<oDrmwA[srs(v Ami. ��a m-�w iww.cmu. bn�a oYTwrAra. R rafa:c tlWaa[ ffJt'r-"317 c aer%>• s - 7FTa Itlm rY1Y os awWv aDwstre J J { o 00 rri0°DY�ti nn°.°Yorsu m S IE IW[: L1-1_LLj It PHO PLANK 1 I y{�{]� `I /J// _ LEGEND 01 ) K__1 I r N 1 I ,�/ POI Mil of 1.4.4 a'Or 46A0W I' rp r Rwr v TDrurn wanly a Ya(to D(➢n.W 1.011 aDn 90:AUOBEA _ par MOE YTaIT EASE.. . COOROMAu ! a/IL.(wm Or IM wa1DA OArA 64 Um. 10U1 M.IWb 68APWC SCE &NALO I yY 4011T OE V. Cls rs rat ru]c i�a ws wry AMA.A 11OA. AVIISIE.NII000If,AZ gs719 Au usIYB.4 AMA. 20 vP mix war I�, 10 1 AI/Dm1 K r.1h3Aa AKA SW.. .0 K,..SE 1 T T ! K. uAsswuM0wsr p uol RSr s OF 1.4.RrnRwf w DCEM.AKT ILA I ! MONOPOLE DETAIL j OM tlusc a>ww Irls 1�a m 1 Yrw YMFrTA(AWE 1Y[aos Y ratll♦W Yap , 10/✓��aRf SYOM ALMA 6 R0r(D rNal 010941 la IIMXIMIEMOIMMIll= ROM COMM C0E➢04W YI n aromiaDOM so-..v ON�W 1nrt°W♦art A 0rlvtlAM w ra1.>m K➢a ON y 1�a...ammo 060141114104 MAW 1110E Rsa 510:SNP 1 _�____-______-____-.- --- ---..--._.- --. _-_ _�-_ _-. .` E/1 DDR.6R 1W Miff WOO 9.0011 OQl MOT a0YY1*B 04T YL Wags.AM ➢R RWt MOW OR➢aR Loc.../Y K1.061111rcri 1.(0pfo.cwr al suor.1D MM.KOK Ma SUPERSTITION BLVD �.,�r� NO ar OR 0.46Acweo m41.066r - - -- - - - - - - ---_- - -- --- w - -� 0€4*. L S- 1 gararYc c -------'--- ---i IEC I NMI I NEc41E°, 1 Mt non teoor.eu l 1 I...F..I1141 1 I I= OEiVq TAUIgOS.EAI. I 13 7 I 1F1111111 I 11 „MSFw� J [) MOM MUM I I 10p MMKb^d.Lr....P.C. SAW ASPINLI MUG IM� ■1��qp.,, I iNFAy111f bpi YLW-)bl Wavle umbialevelblalcumn I — - �� I I I I I I I I 1 I I II I I!1' MMUS* ( , N;O \ -6 { .. � - - — — 1 1Y I UK/ Jl,�• WEINas r uselmlr I 11EEO UHF PEU SUE SW i{ IIN E1��aa ,°J�I 1 j I I I 1 I U 1 I I I I I 0 I 1 j PROMO)" „ ( 11 I 1 I 11111 I - - 7WE PM KAM I J.WOW .� f FA/WYNN 9FLIDl I owb sa n.f We .-_T m L,� 0141us at'MONOPOLE.Pu6ONA f H4PA£if1: F--_ -_ A_ HPd1' I alrl- I CGOaWIRS I rmcaoa...`.0 r ...lb,.,e..w UMW IMMO --%---)1 ..q d.., , ..d..a. NCV �: SEIIEII f WI ITS L . I I I +- -- L , ,` an .CELL STE I I -- , , ,USSPOW I SITE NAME: 1 ��\JJJJ1 I I I I I 0 I I 1 I 1 PHO PLANK 0I I SITE ADDRESS: $ �6T.Mo 1001 N.Iwo RD. APACNE JLNCTION.AZ og. Ilittoela 85R19 OF 590A5 PROPIlOY UAinNF I LESSORS ...rrtt4 __._-____ �.._____- -"-Wpm _-- -__— - —--_—_ ---_---•-- $RE PLAN di OVERAU.SITE PLAN 7 1 SI m4 3a T4 vas slot I'.tl.r No ND sr.uvr ��"" TIIRI wE \j IMBENIMMINIMMII Pi fCJrdO'E i.wn91111NM RVN ill 760AKIMEMMOMMONTENI ( ( C E OMO MO CURD. COMO LIRE WIWI IV 8 amminimori -•PARIEq PAVED POAO---\\ I eaar09Fa coneltlNE or Ir SIDE • _. _ , a0 M ON►NIEIESS Lenny UMW 1_ iY - -. PROPCSm IYIE MO. 1 A(C Miff TIP.Of 2 `'! — \ I . ... fJf1AVA SHWA GATE , I I t I. Noo I. I.dlt -G41....P.C. 11 I W.s eat 4. f2D-4.1=4 NA 14614.0 a.."m CM CURS 1 I �L� El06Tp6[IEA.DOSIDEO—1 y 3. uss 1� 1 .. .., . . r •• PROPOSED YEI✓�N Y10.(lEs4�^1 M1 . TRANSFORM y ;-i--- i j .f 1 CISSIL 041 SWAM . r. 4 I �n n PROPOSED CARNET N9New , INA` �� + C401MIIEIE pW%O l ON IE1M �i PROPOSED MEM 'y !+ DIECRIONCT ANOTRNISTN `J lv • _- V UDR l4f9AN MEN Off N f EP+eO. OM - 1 CONFRERE EMMA f WB •RinP.Row& • on : , _ --,��f \ W AERONWUNO I IlDsnxD scNEfi�WAL \ R.AXOOOWE 10 ee.Mt,.a.1,r PCr b \ wZatzrw.y'" 11'i=s, 4w..M/r.01,010..w.PROPOSED PoEM Wness LF6E USE ` a! IMPOSED MENEM TO IW�5%D' 4--0-Mr..�: _.. ......_-.1.--------PCOSIDDI EfONOPOIL SOLO 1E.9E AREA Ll ✓/ E0SUNO ICENnAAE r-e �� ..LDIE OF O04RA .-1-.." 1 DI LOfA. DAMIIOIpPpLE DOsnND oRA+v. [ , 1 C (OI10I NT MOM . 4. OSIOA 14 / 1 PROPOSED 1EON WIRELESS ANIMAASSL((44) '1. /' PR SECTOR EN SECTORS (1 OO ANIMAS 1100.110'.!/Y Al UD S or Sf1E NAME c 0 / PHO PLANK 11 "N.I41 ADDRESS:0 RR 1001D. MACf1E JUNCTION,AZ 85219 f n ENLARGEEDD SITE PLAN 1 (T)ENLARGED SITE PLAN L.E po;;;,..a.V,+e•r P.,new.ea.`I Z-2 . . .. . i 48 r.mk \---- f vorizirgingagg v 'b. 1.,..la.WO 11111111111111 a onnitO ANTENNAS / \ ., CESNIO ANIENIO S (` Jf PROPOSED VERMIN WIRELESS m--�' [ �1 LI u J ,.I t Yl.fl r 1' I ANTENNAS(33 SECTORS IAM 1 (4)W?(A EIS PER 9ELROR jT PROPOSED KAQON X 1WAl OF(IO)N/IEW I 'jl Aao1NAS(J)SECTORS OR Io•O MrYIrcY-wow-.c. (4)AMEoi 11 FIR SECTOR Mt S TN L. T ra..e avez - ^ , TOTAL Or Ill)MEMOS _ .4A.l ....E...bear). MOZIMIRIMIBIll[ Y ---.- , ---e— •-• msg.YOIIOPOIE I 6 J L r - H FISEWO NONOFOLL E>49i1N0 e'Nt91 COW MVLL g b E • w oESTRO aOW40 3 § CASTES 1RW SFONYER a NavmE ON. COSTING SHELTER k 0 1 1 Y PROPOSED treznn lnnEetss R EOUPYIM CONALT 'sue PROPOSED YOLLDO WIRELESS 7tvr.•L.y wN ntsir E« raSTAKE-if GENERATOR. E•.4.•/w IMesc..FTOSBNO DOWNS OATE • R 4 PROPOSED MOON e. COSMO 11'KM OWI Wl. �:(:'.r/At •.Yy,� - • DOSING ti:'�•. -•' ,''� �. ;•,✓.� ,• _ Y % „f ' •.I jl -I . ;4_-i;; 'I.T;zil, , 'L T .E• ''` •• '+'• ' .., SE RIaEE1 MOE _i , I I� I� I f 1• •ilE•I. ' REMMUMEIMEIMMUM • 5 6�o��Q�-;•d,-JJ�S�b Oho.,,,,C,K��!,0 viv,-,;�!�....- A.,<rt, ,�.C<, SITE I14Ac: ,A4 q q�i 4,,••p"It,s2�i Q��IJ4,,,,„,,-, � �,z.4. Os,��y�Qr�`q`ZJ`,i)v� %0 G",*`��/0,Z,*.A\.ra PHO PLANK 11 SITE ADDRESS: 1001 N.IDAFtO RD. /PACK JIINCl1ON,A2 113218 SITE ELEVATIONS 4ch WESTKIV ELEVATION '-1 o. ®NORTH ELEVATION 127 -Z ' REIRENZIERA �ioifsia`awe Yw•-Fa'Da er IwE rix-1 Sot A ulk Trr_r.r ov a NNE If.E+•1 ` 1 3( 5 1 S 6 Z-3 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Attorney City of Apache Junction 300 East Superstition Boulevard Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH VERIZON WIRELESS FOR LOCATION OF COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ON CITY PROPERTY This First Amendment to Lease Agreement (the "Amendment") is made as of the 2I' day of Opce bey 2009 (the "Effective Date") by and between City of Apache Junction, an Arizona municipal corporation ("Lessor"), and Gila River Cellular General Partnership, an Arizona general partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, by Cellco Partnership, its Managing General Partner ("Lessee"), with reference to the facts set forth in the Recitals below: RECITALS A. Lessor and Lessee have entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated October 3, 2006 (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which Lessee leases from Lessor a portion of the property (the "Premises") located at 1001 N. Idaho Rd., County of Pinal, City of Apache Junction, Arizona (the "Property"), all as more particularly described in the Agreement, together with utility cable space, a right of access and a right to install utilities. B. Lessor and Lessee have agreed that in order to accommodate Lessee's new antenna panels on the Premises, the parties have identified a new vault and an additional utility right-of-way ("New Utilities Right-of-Way") for Lessee's use. Therefore, the parties desire to: (i) amend the Agreement to reflect the New Utilities Right-of-Way; (ii) supplement Exhibit "A" of the Agreement with Exhibit "A-1" of the Amendment; and (iii) ratify and reaffirm the Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts contained in the Recitals above, the mutual covenants and conditions below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. New Utilities Right of Way. Effective upon full execution of this Amendment, the parties agree that Exhibit "A-I" attached hereto and incorporated herein shall supplement Exhibit "A" of the Agreement. The parties hereby agree and acknowledge that Exhibit "A-1" attached to this Amendment accurately represents and depicts the new vault and additional utility right-of- 1 way granted for Lessee's operation of the Premises. Except to the extent arising out of Lessor's negligence or willful misconduct, Lessee agrees to repair any damage caused as a result of Lessee's installation of the New Utilities Right of Way. 2. Rent to Lessor. As rent under this Amendment in consideration for Lessor granting the New Utilities Rights of Way, Lessee shall pay to Lessor a one time fee in the amount of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00), payable no later than sixty (60) days from full execution of this Amendment. 3. Continued Effect. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between any term and provision of the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms and provisions of this Amendment shall control. In addition, except as otherwise stated in this Amendment, all initially capitalized terms will have the same respective defined meaning stated in the Agreement All captions are for reference purposes only and shall not be used in the construction or interpretation of this Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. GILA RIVER CELLULAR GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona general partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: Cellco Partnership • Managing General Partner [ad Li 4 y: Walt r L. J es, J . I Its: Area Vice President Network CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, an Arizona municipal corporation jP By/John S. Insalaco Its: Mayor ATTE T: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: R. Joel Stern, City Attorney 3 EXHIBIT"A-1" [SEE ATTACHED] Exhibit A-1 •IIIIIII I f@R NMO _��_...- ._---------- --'- - --' ' - -`--------- L NMYPNS *1 5JYMI• n001,00.Wow NMI lir any w Mr Man Mem,......... r,....:s . ,,.. "s"'°t we 0 .,Darr ma.an).»t..N..La» . a aaaw.rNr wr» VOlf� lwire%ss rant Ws) 'uw"� is.asm�a»•Lue.+.maw saw.aarrr.a. .... ' MP*, ti t.ourw ar i.Mr m r ML _. „•...+0ac a awww N Nlr rear-Mot axe t ru.n.p Ir YMCM[aoa tr wrwvan ptMIB iMFRNEC 10' •'�, I t POWr lrr ARYM Tele§pan L.m01 ti..awe w.vw.aw.iwor TRENCH DETAILty, ,o'�n aa.a..�. tea •.lso. I0001 AOOaabr PM le .. �c1a�a�rasr� I a imv a MI Nrarw t.4 N stud Krt- � I 4.• .+� I L1•10 mot W [ta Nlrq+u lags ' MO ION+ YtsLG aa4ti�w uua ha MI 0301010000 I L /uuvr �ufel»! =±:: iSi m1 ul [) 1a. •411:447,, y MM OW N a.MM Ca1aN rLL OR �. ], IC MONA M INt.tar.MU et aaca Olt*/ I. II 1 oorataw aNsawraa k Installation Of New o :ooe0r N1R'wssarw iaAt I I o 4"Conduit-Bore/ 1 Trench required 111N1 i iwfM(. 11 I 1 alr[ar 7aV.laTm I _ © :1 worm met.ro>Na --11 ■_-. j �� , J f` I FI 1 I I I U I I I I I I U '"'a"`°' I ■� ■ R' ,L (LYWf • �--0...r»t�-------�� -- nr- . NOw M aQG. II ■ ■ ., 0 III I I I - - I ■ 1 .� ll0 l� .11:1, s�iu+tlr ,__G i 2'x3'Vaults to be Proposing to Pull —_ — oNM.Matr I, burled flush with Fiber through .,,. »,, \ ` — d IPLANK ground _ .Existing 4"Conduit- " i I — No boring/trenching y` I � - - a I �e�w jy 1 rea1ulred j4il I MAIM c Q .SET Uitd _i _ s I 1� --._ — I SITE PLAN 1 -T_ \ 1 _ - --aN..NNW la-� ; SIKIr A1MY[i l I L ) n � II`IlII11111111 ' f C'...1 1 1. -vow.Muar v ■u c:!...1wll. c� •�-.. snra+ 1 4 1 I1 I I I I 1 I (I I I I I I - :,,-CMILL. �:� 9 I I � I o —J O • SITE PLAN I 1 .r. City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition Boulevard Apache Junction,AZ 85119 Agenda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item No 4 File ID: 13-358 Sponsor. Jeff Serdy Agenda Date. Index In Control. City Council Work Session Discussion on the FY 2013-2014 Legislative Work Plan item entitled "Coordination of Economic Development Efforts"and marketing of the city Discussion. This item was identified on the City Council's FY 2013-2014 Legislative Work Plan The description in the work plan is as follows The city has many economic development,tourism, and community outreach resources at its disposal Council expressed interest in exploring how we better leverage those resources to gain interest in visiting and growing the community, with particular interest show casing the potential of growth in the Lost Dutchman Heights area They also expressed the desire to understand and possibly streamline or cross-train city staffs involvement in the different resource areas to provide for a greater ability to respond to any interested parties Attachments o . City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 11/13/2013 I I, ,, i_ r I Apache Junction -�-�- `�, `w • T • I Police Department __ i • ��ti • J,_ !�:' PALI /k 1 • • - I� • 7 1 1 i I • �r 1 , • • • { — I A 911 • 11 • Ghost Calls I— ETRL A • 1 • • • r ills • • ; = Q - 01-01 -1 3 ill dii 001 ii,, . p4 ,s.),,,„,,,,,, ___I -1 1 1 - .... ammo i ( ' 4,-7--- - - -T - - 11 -11 -13 ea a ge‘„, , , , I 11 I r-r 1 ['I f tO , , ____ • .,,,,,,, • , Tt-'-,`C -i- -: � Affected Area ► '', - I� , : Low Yellow _ _ _._ - - I'll Med - Green lily 's 14 - � • High - Red IIINN , �r ! _ „_. w 1 ,...., w1 i-,_i4 I a ,� 1 , i j l■ i PI �.. � .�. _ — r " 1/12113 I I , i I l I ' I g As Cl 0 15 0 3 0.G Miles topke-- City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300E Superstition Boulevard Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction AZ 85119 Agenda Item No 5 File ID: 13-375 Sponsor: George Hoffman Agenda Date 11/18/2013 Index: In Control.City Council Work Session Presentation and discussion on ghost calls and customer service provided by CenturyLink Presentation and discussion. Attachments.Apache_Junction_PD_AZ_911 Ghost Calls Map, 911 Ghost Calls Analysis 01012013 to 11112013 yak City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 11/13/2013 i I_ �— _ l-- Apache Junction • • f 1— __ / Police Department • r -_ • _ —I -E — • , • - ,R• • _ 4kplilillyn �� • t t 1 .ate _ • ' - - 911 `__- ET ,'R C}E —�= ' _ % • Ghost Calls • • L� in.... -� • il --‘,..-<. .- •• 01 13 IIIIII gil 11 ��° ti .i 1t to ,-__..1t-;. ,.. 4 i;. T _ __ , ,. _1 1 1-1 1 -1 3 or �I T� . 1� ; Affect y,--�- I LJ Affected Area � � _ �. , ` 1, , '� Low Yellow Ia11I III t Li + �t �_ • )'__• Med - Green .� High Red r..y-. .,,y,.. - 0 • — !yntr+jI WI MI 11--0[- � 1<i �tf�s�a��aa rr.r,. ' mot. /I n • , �"fr\ 'A' - L LPI r d..,.., - As 1/1. 0 0 15 0 3 0 6 Miles y 911 Ghost Calls Analysis Period of: Jan 1, 2013— Nov 11, 2013 Issue: Complaints received regarding Apache Junction Police Department Officers being sent to an p individual's residence as a result of false (ghost) 911 calls. In an attempt to locate 911 ghost calls, a search was conducted to identify all 911 Welfare check calls received during the period of Jan 1, 2013 to Nov 11, 2013. The analysis of calls were isolated to 911 Welfare Check calls based on Dispatch procedures to log 911 calls that are showing as a valid location, however is unable to make contact with caller to determine if an emergency exists Findings: • Over the period of Jan 1, 2013 to Nov 11, 2013 there were a total of 557 Welfare Check calls received on 911. • Of the 557 calls received, approximately 126 calls are believed to be 911 Ghost Calls equating to approximately 23%of the calls • During the 126 calls, a total of 164 officers were dispatched. • Based on the number of officers actually dispatched, a total of 25 58 hours (1535 minutes) were spent on-scene. • The most calls to a single location are 9. • Currently, when a ghost call is identified, the call information is forwarded to p CenturyLink for resolution. Completed by. AJPD Analyst Caswell As of. 11-12-13