The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986 03.18 City Council Regular Agenda peACHE PLEASE FILL Ol'^\ "REQUEST TO SPEAK" IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT CALL O �Gy� TO THE PUBLIC OR ON ANY NON-PUBLIC '.1.. "-m--= (Di HEARING ITEM. for- "1RIZOp' it Uz 4 Grche 11 1CtZUn APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS '... 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 MARCH 18, 1986 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA (All items marked with an asterisk (*) will be considered by the City Council as a group and will be adopted with one motion. No separate discussion will be held on any of these items unless a Councilmember wishes to do so. In this case, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ) *1 . Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from the Special Meeting of February 20, 1986 *3. Acceptance of Minutes from the Regular Meeting of March 4, 1986 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED VISITORS AND GUESTS AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CALL TO THE PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 487, PZ-82-85, Commission initiated amendment to Section 16.0404 Uses Subject to a Conditional Use Permit of the Zoning Ordinance, which would allow additional General Commercial uses in the C-2 Local Commercial District as a conditional use. 5. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 455, PZ-66-85, Application by R.E. and Lillian Christensen and Keith and Kathryn Stachar to rezone a 32,875 square foot parcel, located about 220 feet west of the northwest corner of the intersection of North Ironwood Drive and Superstition Boulevard, from CB-1 Local Business to C-3 General Commercial. (Postponed Item) 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 484, Revising Speed Limit on 16th Avenue. (With the Emergency Clause) 7. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 486, PZ-3-86, Council initiated amendment to Zoning Ordinance to provide for regulations for "adult" businesses. 7.5 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 489, Setting Dates for Special Referendum Election and Submittal of Arguments for or against. (With the Emergency Clause) OLD BUSINESS 8. REQUEST FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY SUNRISE RV RESORT (Postponed Item) 9. APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (Postponed Item) 10. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-05, AB-86-01 , Request for abandonment of First and Second Avenues from Hilton Road to Wagonwheel Road. (Postponed Item) NEW BUSINESS 11 . ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 12. ACCEPTANCE OF YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD MANUAL 13. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF STREET LIGHT INSTALLATIONS 14. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 85-52, AB-85-15, Request for abandonment of Concho Street from Vista Road to State Route 88. 15. RELEASE OF CONTOWCYFfiDS- FOR COPY CHARGES AND LEGAL ADVERTISING 16. SETTING OF DATE FOR SPECIAL ELECTION AND RELEASE OF CONTINGENCY FUNDS FOR ELECTION COSTS. 17. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-07, Requesting authorization from State Land Section Board to annex state lands. 18. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, MARCH 31 , 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, APRIL 1 , 1986 19. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL 20. ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS." A p CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING FEBRUARY 20, 1986 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, "InkArizona, was held on February 20, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hill called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present. Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Staff Present City Clerk Kathleen Connelly City Attorney David Alexander PROPOSED SETTLEMENT ON LITIGATION WITH YAVAPAI COUNTY City Attorney David Alexander explained that in 1983 Yavapi County filed suit with every other city and county in the State, based on the system for dividing gas tax revenue, and the amount the City of Apache Junction was overpaid was $3,926.21, and questioned whether Apache Junction would gain by continuing this litigation. Mr. Alexander further stated that upon checking with the Finance Controller, the City's budget would not suffer if this settlement were paid. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE CASE OF YAVAPAI COUNTY VS. THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION BE SETTLED IN THE AMOUNT OF $3926.21. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 6:24 P.M. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. nr Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEBURARY 20, 1986 PAGE 2 OF 2 OIN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 4, 1986 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on March 4, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council ,0111N Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hill called the meeting to order at 7.00 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Baljo,Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Staff Present. City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark City Attorney David Alexander Controller Keith Lewis Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Public Works Rich Broman Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell Others Present. Ms Jean Perkins 616 N Cactus Apache Junction, AZ 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, AND THAT ITEM NO. 6 OF THE REGULAR MEETING BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 18, 1986. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. Introduction of Distinguished Visitors and Guests None AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS None CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Michael J. McNulty ultY reported on the Library progress and showed a video tape of the Library, and stated that a left turn lane had been added to Broadway Avenue at Phelps Drive. Mr. McNulty also stated that several other problem areas are presently under review for similar improvements. CALL TO THE PUBLIC Ms Jean Perkins, 616 N. Cactus, Apache Junction, wished to know why dedications of rights-of-way and other footage was necessary and is it required by City or State law. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 482, SPEED LIMIT (With Emergency Clause) Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that this is proposed change in the speed limit on Lost Dutchman Boulevard between Meridian and Idaho Road from 35 mph to 45 mph, and stated that this adjustment has been justified by field studies. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak on this item. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 482, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as ewes follows. ORDINANCE NO. 482, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REVISING THE SPEED LIMIT ON LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND IDAHO ROAD, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 482, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, ROCK SHADOWS WEST Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 4, 1986 PAGE 2 OF 6 PIN Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY MR. CHARLIE CLARK FOR ROCK SHADOWS WEST, BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. Councilwoman Taylor expressed a concern as to whether the park will need a large game license, but as the park will not presently be using the license, it may be adjusted later. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl asked what the difference is between a small and large binao license. Councilwoman Taylor replied that a small game license cannot have an intake of over $300 per week, and are not required to pay tax to the state, as it is nonprofit VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS AWARD OF BID FOR PROSPECTOR PARK RESTROOM/CONCESSION BUILDING ) Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell explained that four bids were received for the construction of a restroom and concession building for the Prospector Park, and recommended that the bid be awarded to Consumer Construction Inc., in the amount of $46,758.00. Councilman Eidson wished to know what the recommendation is based on #12N Mr. Bell stated that besides being the lowest bid, references also were a deciding factor. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT THE BID FOR THE PROSPECTOR PARK RESTROOM/CONCESSION BUILDING BE AWARDED TO CONSUMERS CONSTRUCTION INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $46,758 00 Councilman Baljo Seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT THE APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 18, 1986 Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. Councilman Baljo amended the motion TO POSTPONED THE APPOINTMENT TO THE FIRST REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 4, 1986 PAGE 3 OF 6 gip:.:. The amendment died due to lack of a second. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. APPOINTMENT TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD Mr. Bell informed the Council that one Talent Bank application was submitted by Ms Paula Jager, and recommended that Ms Jager be appointed to the Youth Advisory Board Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT PAULA D. JAGER BE APPOINTED TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE- Unanimous The motion carried. REQUEST FOR DEADLINE EXTENSION BY HUD MOBILE HOME STANDARDS COMMITTEE Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer stated that the Hud Mobile Home Standards Committee has had three meetings and anticipate submitting a report by the first meeting in April, but request an extension of the deadline to April 15, 1986. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT THE DEADLINE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE HUD MOBILE HOME STANDARDS COMMITTEE BE EXTENDED TO APRIL 15, 1986 Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. /1.4 AMENDMENTS TO AGE SPECIFIC OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT Mr. Newcomer stated that there was discussion of changing the Age Specific Overlay Zoning District age re- quirements from 50 to 45 years of age, which requires initiation of the amendment by the City Council, and public hearings by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Councilman Baljo MOVED TO INITIATE AN AMENDMENT TO THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING SECTION 24.0302 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED AGE OF OCCUPANCY FROM 50 YEARS TO 45 YEARS OF AGE AND DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND FORWARD ITS RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion Councilwoman Taylor asked if this would effect the ordinance adopted for Apache Villa. City Attorney David Alexander stated that this would not effect this previous action. Councilwoman Taylor expressed support of the 50 years of age restriction. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 4, 1986 PAGE 4 OF 6 a,.sr Councilman Baljo stated that the limit ofmotion 45 yearcarried of. age would be more easily defended should it be necessary to have any court action. VOTE. In Favor. Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Jimenez, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed. Councilwoman Taylor The REQUEST FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SUNRISE RESORT ) Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE REQUEST FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BY SUNRISE RV RESORT BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 18, 1986. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE- Unanimous The motion carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, MARCH 17, 1986, EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, MARCH 18, 1986 Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6.00 P.M. AND A WORK SESSION AT 7.00 P.M., ON MARCH 17, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6.00 P.M., ON MARCH 18, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Vice Mayor Bakkedahl reported on the upcoming East Valley Partnership meeting, that he would be attending as representative for Apache Junction. Councilman Jimenez reported on the Youth Advisory Board meeting REQUESTS OF COUNCIL None. ADJOURNMENT Councilmen Jimenez MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 7.36 P M Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 4, 1986 PAGE 5 OF 6 41.1""nr *Consent Agenda Items are as follows. *1 Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from the Regular Meeting of February 18, 1986. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND /1"N CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk [. 00111 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 4, 1986 PAGE 6 OF 6 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ‘4(# 1, Xi) r > f g ITEM # I MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: cie/ YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER � inir__ii Mnni 1TMEN m+. Fes' COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED '. ABSTAINED TOTAL Cam. ITEM NOS. 1-3 I MOVE THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 , 2 AND 3 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 487, PZ-82-85 2 . WILL THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION iskk ROLL CALL VOTE AtoIN "Is ACHE✓o ‘0( (� v ,, E -pik. z Y ,i .i -1Ptzo P amity o C pache 02unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 10, 1986 Agenda Approved by /� Date Itc Consent Agenda MEMORANDUM TO.:-1 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Public Hearing Old Business THROUGH: ` -,',. MICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER ��. New Business FROM: CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Postponed Item PREPARED BY:_ JIM NAKAGAWA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: Or AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 18, 1986 PZ-82-85 (C-2 CONDITIONAL USES) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This is a Planning and Zoning Commission-initiated amendment to Section 16.0404 Uses Subject to a Conditional Use Permit of the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance. The proposal would allow additional General Commercial uses in the C-2 Local Commercial District as a conditional use. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Mr. Keith Stachar in case PZ-66-85 requested rezoning from CB-1 to C-3 in an area designated Local Commercial on the General Plan. In his letter of December 27, 1985, he suggested to the Planning and Zoning Commission that certain General Commercial uses be allowed in the C-2 Local Commercial District by conditional use permit. Those uses, along with his later idea for a sign making business, were classified into the nine use types described below: 1. Wholesaling, Storage and Distribution: Mini-warehouses. Storage service within buildings primarily for individuals to store personal effects and for businesses to store materials and equipment (other than live animals and plants) for operation of an industrial or commercial enterprise located elsewhere. Individual spaces usually have a maximum floor area of 400 square feet and they are not allowed to function as an independent retail , wholesale, business or service use but incidental uses may include the repair and main- tenance of stored materials by the tenant. 2. Wholesaling, Storage and Distribution: Light. Wholesaling and storage services within large buildings such as wholesale distributors, storage warehouses, and moving/storage firms. 3. Construction Sales and Services. Establishments engaged in construction activities or in the retail or wholesale trade of materials used in the construction of buildings such as materials stores, tool and equipment rental or sales, and building contractors. 1001 NORTH iDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PZ-82-85 (ORD. 487) ~8/86 AGENDA ITEM MEMO OF 3/10/86 PAGE TWO 4. Consumer Repair Services. Establishments engaged in providing repair services to individuals and households rather than firms, but excluding automotive repair, such as appliance repair shops, bicycle repair and musical instrument repair firms. 5. General Personal Services. Establishments engaged in providing informational , instructional , personal improvement and similar services of a nonprofessional nature but excluding Spectator Sports and Entertainment, Participant Sports and Recreation, and Transient Habitation. Typical uses include photography studios, driving school or fitness salons. 6. Business Support Services. Establishments engaged in providing services of a clinical , employment, protective, or minor processing nature to firms rather than individuals such as secretarial services, answering services, printing or blueprint services. 7. Business Equipment Sales and Services. Establishments engaged in the sale, rental or repair of equipment and supplies used by office, professional and service establishments rather than by individuals but excludes automotive, construction and farm equipment. Typical uses include office equipment and supply firms, small business machine repair shops, and restaurant equipment and supply firms. 8. Specialty Retail Sales. Establishments offering a single type, or closely related types, of merchandise usually oriented toward discretionary or luxury purchase rather than necessary purchase or the satisfaction of recurring needs. Typical uses include arts and crafts stores, flower shops, gift shops, beachwear stores, and antique shops. 9. Custom Manufacturing. Establishments engaged in the on-site production of goods by hand manufacturing involving only the use of hand tools or domestic mechanical equipment not exceeding two horsepower or a kiln not exceeding eight cubic feet and the sale to consumers of only those goods produced on-site. Typical uses include ceramic studios, candle shops, and custom jewelry making. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Some of those uses are already allowed in the C-2 zone such as consumer repair services, general personal services, specialty retail sales, and business support services (except printing) . Therefore, those uses need not be considered for this case. Mr. Stachar suggested some of the other uses because of its low traffic generation potential such as the mini-warehouse. While mini-warehouses are not expected to generate a lot of traffic, traffic impact was only one consideration in the creation of a Local Commercial District. The nature of the business and the bulky appearance of some of the businesses were other considerations. Mini- warehouses and other storage operations take up a lot of land and their bulky appearance would contrast sharply with the residential uses and the small-scale HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PZ-82-85 (ORD. NO. 487) ^ 3/18/86 AGENDA ITEM MEMO OF 3/10/86 PAGE THREE business uses that were intended for the Local Commercial zone and the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, we would not recommend any wholesaling, warehousing and storage use in the C-2 zone. Neither would we recommend that Construction Sales and Service be allowed for similar reasons. Business Support Services (printing) can be compatible with the Local Commercial uses if the business is limited to the 4000 square foot maximum floor area. Originally, printing was disallowed in this zone because printing operations connoted large printing presses. However, off-set printing and copying services ..6k were not intended to be excluded. Also, Business Equipment Sales and Services, if held to the same limitation, may be compatible in this zone. It is conceivable that Custom Manufacturing such as sign painting, candle-making and jewelry making, would be compatible in the C-2 zone. It is not currently allowed in the C-3 zone. Staff finds this amendment to be consistent with the City's General Plan. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION A work session was held on February 20, 1986 to discuss this ordinance and a public hearing was held on February 25, 1986 wherein the following motion was adopted: (M/S Taylor/Conway) 6-0-0. I move that PZ-82-85, a Commission-initiated amendment to the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance allowing as a conditional use in the C-2 Local Commercial District, Business Support Services (printing-light printing, offset, the kind that's allowed all over town such as Alphagraphics) , Business Equipment Sales and Services and Light Custom Manufacturing such as candlemaking, custom jewelry, and this would be considered at the time of the Special Use Permit, it would have to be submitted to this Commission as to the type of Light Custom Manufacturing. I recommend these be recommended to the City Council for approval . Mr. Vehon added to the motion that "Also, other similar uses as determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission to be no more detrimental or obnoxious than the uses listed above. " The reasons for this are: 1 . When the Re-Write Committee set these uses up under each specific zone it was known at the time that everything couldn't be included as it should be and I think that these uses that we're adding now under Special Use Permit, some of them should have been under that particular type of zoning at the time the Re-Write Committee considered them because they are uses that are allowed even in C-1 and I 'm putting the Light Custom Manufacturing in even though it's not allowed under the C-3 because if it's allowed in C-2 it would automatically be allowed in C-3. JN:jo Dec. 27, 1985 Planning and Zoning Dept. City of Apache Junction R.E. PZ - 66-85 The undersigned request the above referenced rezoning application to be changed from C3 to C2 along with the following additional uses permitted by Conditional Use Permit; A. Automotive Parts Store B. Printing, Blueprinting, Engraving. C. Repairs, Services, Speciality and construction types, including storage (with-in an enclosed building) of materials and inventory used in such operations. D. Storage (with-in enclosed building) of busines and personal products, goods, and inventory. Keith H. tachar ORDINANCE NO. 487 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL USES IN THE C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AS CONDITIONAL USES, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT /miN /— SECTION I IN GENERAL Section 16.0404 Uses Subject to a Conditional Use Permit of the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance be amended to allow the following additional uses and pro- fvisions Business Support Services (Printing) Business Equipment Sales and Services Light Custom Manufacturing Other similar uses as determined by the Planning and Zoning Commission q\S\SI to be no more detrimental or obnoxious than the uses listed above SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F. Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / CAIt'( (), (/x ITEP1 # MEET I NG 0 3 S)76()& MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: ? YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL _ MAYOR HILL I UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR I OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET ---6 6L- ;di NOTES -..... it(7S (7 ' J4j lAjj r6) eil/s4 °471t /1"9:jt Pg d- ' . 6-1-) iy , , i t , 041. (17))-x;r}uf ITEf1 # MEETING OF /i- MOTION BY: r SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER 7 ..•. COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR / COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL / UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES '10( °A *qo ITEM # MEETING OF 3/K MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: IM YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER I f COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL 11/ UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 0,01 Awe, Ammik ITEM NO. 4 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 487, BE READY THE CITY CLERK AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 487 BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 487, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 487, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AS ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: A. PUBLIC HEARING 1 • FOR ORDINANCE NO. 455, PZ-66-85 2 . WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PRESENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE Q ✓. a17- \, 4 �/zoN41 ity o C pac/e unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 11 , 1986 MEMORANDUM T44-) HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: 267/MICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: // CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING PREPARED BY: ' 'JIM NAKAGAWA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 18, 1986 PZ-66-85 ORDINANCE 455 The applicant, Keith Stachar, would like the City Council to render a decision first on the related case, PZ-82-85 (C-2 Conditional Uses) , before making a decision on this case. At this time, PZ-66-85 is still to be considered as a rezoning request to C-3 General Commercial . Please note that Ordinance 455 contains a number of uses which would be prohibited on the subject site. If the Council does grant the C-3 zoning, staff would recommend that subsections (2) and (3) of Section I be eliminated due to the future administrative difficulties of enforcing this type of stipulation. JN:jo Agenda Approved by ,E-/-e-- Date Item # Consent Agenda P;.bitc Near„nn C,_ 8,,,,Itet,s _ -- _--.--- P:3w ! i r,r.Zs> Poct,3anea Itam a/��ALQ ,�r 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 rplp,CHE•de/ 47— \n4 ---K:is -, -P"-;) • gR/ZONP ity elf &4pache &unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Is January 28, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ; f MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: //PCHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: PZ-66-85 (ORDINANCE NO. 455) CHRISTENSEN/STACHAR This case is a rezoning request for C-3 (General Commercial ) in an area planned for Local Commercial uses. The applicant, on December 10, 1985, requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission initiate an amendment (PZ-82-85) to the C-2 (Local Commercial ) District to allow additional General Commercial uses by Conditional Use Permit. PZ-82-85 will be scheduled for a Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on February 26, 1986, and a City Council hearing on March 18, 1986. We request that your Council continue this item until March 18, 1986 so that a decision could be reached regarding the C-2 conditional uses. The applicant concurs in this request for a continuance. I ebb' CRN:jl Agenda Approved by ' Date Item k Consent Agenda_94 Public Hearing .;_42. k ' Old Business New Business Postponed item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 I t, O� PQACHF�G'G iti, &4 pache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r� November 27, 1985 Agenda Approved by X'C�i Date Iter� MEMORANDUM T93 -, THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Consent Agenda _1..,_-- THROUGH: J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER g 9iMICHAELPublic Hearin FROM: 'CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Old Business�y New Business PREPARED BY:C JULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER JfW SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - DECEMBER 3, 1985 Postponed Item PZ-66-85 BACKGROUND: Applicant: R.E. and Lillian Christensen and Keith and Kathryn Stachar Representative: Keith Stachar Current Zoning: CB-1 Local Business Proposed Zoning: C-3 General Commercial General Plan Designation: Local Commercial Combined Size of Parcels: 32,875 square feet Location: About 220 feet west of the northwest corner of the inter- section of N. Ironwood Drive and Superstition Blvd. Current Land Use. Commercial building and parking lot under construction Surrounding Land Use: North - self storage units South - single family and mobile homes .�. East - vacant West - single family home Surrounding Zoning North - General Busines Zone by Planned Development South - CB-1 Local Business Zone and General Rural East - CB-1 Local Business Zone West - General Rural Site Characteristics- flat topography PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The requested zoning classification would not comply with the General Plan. The General Plan designation for this location would be for neighborhood or local commercial uses. Several uses within the C-3 classification would not be appropriate for this area. The type of traffic generated by some C-3 uses as well as changes to entrance and exit locations for the adjoining self storage development would be detrimental to the residential uses in close proximity to this development. Staff does not recommend this rezoning request. 1001 NORTH iDAHO s APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Agenda Itern - Decem . 3, 1985 PZ-66-85 Page Two STIPULATIONS IN THE ORDINANCE 1 . The permitted uses allowed in Section 16.052 shall be restricted and that the following uses will not be permitted for the subject site. a. Ambulance services b. Agricultural/horticultural sales and services c. Nurseries (outdoor display permitted) d. Animal sales and services, veterinary (large animals) ; kennel e. Automotive and light equipment: cleaning; repairs; storage of auto- mobiles, recreational vehicles, and boats; sales/rentals of auto and light equipment, including motorcycles. f. Eating, drinking, and entertainment establishments (sales of alcoholic beverages permitted, and includes drive-in types) g. Participant and spectator sports: indoor h. Radio and television stations (excluding transmission towers) i . Gasoline dispensing stations j. Liquor stores k. Transient habitation; hotels; motels 2. All other provisions of Section 16.052 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Apache Junction shall apply. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of November 26, 1985, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Jorgensen/Heermans 4-0-0) "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that rezoning case PZ-66-85, application of R.E. and Lillian Christensen and Keith and Kathryn Stachar for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CB-1 Local Business to C-3 General Commercial that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said applica- tion. Any stipulations or recommendations are. 1 . That there be limited use under C-3 with the total elimination of the use of the 10 articles that Mr. Stachar has submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department with the addition of the elimination of the Ambulance Services. 2. All other provisions of the C-3 Zone will apply. The reason for this recommendation is that: 1 . With the development progressing along Superstition Blvd. this type of construction seems quite in line with what is occurring. 2. Will be to the best interest of the city of Apache Junction." /.... ^ E,cH �ci,, [,~ r ► z -- :=1,. _ ZONP' 'Oily o ( ?ache 0)unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 25, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: MICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM. /r;✓CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. AGENDA ITEM - DECEMBER 3, 1985 PZ-66-85 The attached information on PZ-66-85 is incomplete due to the fact that the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 12, continued their public hearing on the case until November 26, to allow the applicant the opportunity to submit a site plan of the property and a list of C-3 uses he does not want permitted on the property. The action of the P & Z Commission and any revision in the staff recommendation will be provided to the Council prior to December 3. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 PZ-66-85 REZONE FROM CB-1 TO C-3 GREASEWOOD STREET - - -I I TH I I I I TRAILS END PARK I I I S IRONWOOD SELF STORAGE F I CB-2/PD I - - VAC N VAC I � CB1 — -j SUPERSTITION BLVD. ' I - SF SF CB 1 I SF SF ICB-1 MH SF o I I SF I I u. CL - .I CR_5-I I CB_1 - c SUBJECT SITE LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) E I I 0 200 400 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From ( 13 / To C-3 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? Q C L /dil7/f _ ,£CP"-V_rtii 3. Size of your property: � g�s [ ] acres ` 1 square feet 4. What is built on your property now? /f.952/e) 5. What has been built on the property next to yours. North /A/,,"' i .S/Csin E, South 2/€i6/c /loose occ c i/' E East l/nC/94 West Z,f1 jetp gier/C7 74- OUSc 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: / �� J ! S£1 1 s Section //J" , Township 1 North, R nge 8 ast, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? /61Q 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? 4, 73-.4 /. f� /1",g4e ‘,57 �z,, - (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed --(9-fj Application Received by: Receipt No. Fee Amount Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From [ 1;1 / To 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? ' '/ i pr 3. Size of your property: 32. n3- [ ] acres square feet 4. What is built on your property now? d'ej,jpQ (l 6/d:c 5. What has been built on the property next to yours. North ,U1/,,f). 5 f/J/nj1, South 4911e66 c .-/oodSc (Jcc c#C6 East lyndw, West /1)14 S//7 r- PUSc. 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: 1 � Soc) /43, ,2rAii cue Q/L4�vi." (�F.S(1J-7�c ro r''jc s� S£ S y S2 . �c.?`,/_>h 1 j7 7/,�,�� f_ XGr 4r Section / , Township 1 North, R nge 8 ast, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? I& '-,3S 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? 6‘` 17F.,(.,/ rr `��„, ' 55%e/l/tics 7 (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed /D -j` Application Received by: Receipt No. Fee Amount o/ Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 411,10=Mr ORDINANCE NO. 455 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-66-85 FROM CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL 1 The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as The South 115.21 feet of the following described property: The South z of the Southeast 4 of the Southeast ; of the Southeast 4 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, except the West 100 feet thereof, and except the South 50 feet and the East 50 feet thereof, and except the South 195.21 feet of the East 270 feet thereof in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from CB-1 Local Business to C-3 General Commercial 2. The permitted uses allowed in Section 16.052 shall be restricted and that the following uses will not be permitted for the subject site a Ambulance services b. Agricultural/horticultural sales and services c. Nurseries (outdoor display permitted) d Animal sales and services; veterinary (large animals); kennel e Automotive and light equipment cleaning, repairs, storage of auto- mobiles, recreational vehicles, and boats; sales/rentals of auto and light equipment, including motorcycles f Eating, drinking, and entertainment establishments (sales of alcoholic beverages permitted, and includes drive-in types) g. Participant and spectator sports indoor h. Radio and television stations (excluding transmission towers) i Gasoline dispensing stations j Liquor stores k. Transient habitation; hotels, motels 3 All other provisions of Section 16 052 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Apache Junction shall apply. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill ilik Mayor IrATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ORDINANCE 455 PAGE TWO /0\ I ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES � r r ,; t, ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : C-V SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL �f COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V CO UNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL 1 UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHE T / C ! 0.) i , f I NOTES ,,,,j): ( i 2 l� ,. e , c.J v , ifi- t„ L - i 1 •° 7/ ' 1-' O y,/ ) / ',7 , 6 I�JG OF i`i ITEM # MEET MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: oxtr..," YES NO ABSTAINED COUN CILWOMAN TAYLOR MIN1--- COUNCILMAN BALJO MEM VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MOM COUNCILMAN EIDSON MIMI COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER IIMIN MMIIMIIIIOIIII MAYO R HILL MEE UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Am AN& ITEM NO. 5 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 455, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 455 BY TITLE ONLY. c 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 455, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 455, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: _ ft PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 484 2 . WILL THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE P pCHF✓ $ 0 Un Z litio c� gR�ZONP (�JZty o� �pacGce unctzan February 26, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. CITY MANAGER ,) A FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIICC WORKS i'`'`46 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY E01►4, REGARDING. ORDINANCE NO. 484 REVISING SPEED LIMIT ON 16TH AVENUE (AGENDA ITEM) At the Study Session on February 3, 1986, staff was requested to investigate speed limits on 16th Avenue. Field studies were conducted which provided the following data. Ironwood to San Marcos San Marcos to Idaho 1 . 24-hour traffic counts (Summer 1985) 1596 1339 2. Street intersections 0 5 3. Driveway entries 0 28 4. Speed limits posted 35 (established by 25 (not established Council ) by Council ) 5. 85-percentile speed 48 mph 41 mph 6. Visibility Open/clear Open/clear Considering the above, it is recommended that the speed limit be adjusted and established as follows. Ironwood to San Marcos 40 mph San Marcos to Idaho 35 mph Agenda Approved by 49--' Date Item # Consent Agenda RWB:sh Pob. c Hea 1 "/ O d [2 zln)ec,3 Now Eusmsss postponed Item File 100.051 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Irsnr Am\ Ise ORDINANCE NO 484 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REVISING AND ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON SEGEMENTS OF 16TH AVENUE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, oink ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL It is in the public interest to insure safe, effective and efficient traffic flow along public rights-of-way within the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, and it has been determined that speed limits are necessary for the public safety and convenience, therefore, speed limits are established as follows (a.) 16th Avenue - Ironwood Drive to San Marcos Drive - 40 mph (b ) 16th Avenue - San Marcos Drive to Idaho Road - 35 mph Furthermore, the Director of Public Works and the Director of Public Safety are hereby empowered and directed to initiate appropriate action to install the speed limit signs and enforce the speed limits on the referenced street SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdic- tion, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of any violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required by Chapter 12 of this code constitutes a civil traffic violation Civil traffic violations are subject to the provisions of Title 28, Chapter 6, Article 20 and 21 of Arizona Revised Statues and amendments thereof AmokSECTION V EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1986 Norman S Hill, Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander, City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ()/4 )ildp•-/VtY ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: n(\, SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED • COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO 1/7 VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL ✓ , UNANI"^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ... ... ROLL CALL VOTE SH ET NOTES G 1 OPIA tuOjiii .k.A : 1 / VP, ,,Ur 1"))d , , ,ITEM # U MEETING OF (8 ' 1) MOTION BY: cerv, SECONDED BY: CL,t0/1°1 i ' ' YES NO ABSTAINt COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR I COUNCILMAN BALJO if VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHLCOUNCILMAN EIDSONMAYOR HILL UNANIMO S IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL r. /Mk ITEM NO. 6 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 484, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 484, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 484, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 484, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 486, PZ-3-86 2 . WILL THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4. IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE P"kCHF✓4, O v ` -1R/ZONP `pity oe & pache 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Agenda Approved by ... Date lt@ri1 March 7, 1986 Consent Agenda yy MEMORANDUM -Q• HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Public Hearing 3 - J THROUGH: *MICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER Old Business f New Business FROM: CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Postponed it em SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 18, 1986 PUBLIC HEARING PZ-3-86 ORDINANCE NO. 486 BACKGROUND At the December 17, 1986 City Council meeting, the Council initiated an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to provide for regulation of "adult" businesses. The Council directed that the amendments address the zoning classifications in which adult uses may be conducted; minimum distance from schools, churches and residential areas, and to provide for Special Use Permits or other regulations required to regulate adult uses. Staff drafted zoning ordinance amendments based on the directions given by the Council and presented them to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Ordinance No. 486 is based on the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and can be summarized as follows: 1 . Definitions of "adult uses", specifically "adult bookstore" and "adult theater" would be added to the Zoning Ordinance. 2. A conditional use permit would be required for "adult uses" and would only be permitted in the C-4 district. 3. In addition to the normal conditional use permit application and approval procedures certain distances are prescribed between adult uses and certain other uses. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on PZ-3-86 on February 25, and adopted the following motion- (Jorgensen/Taylor 5-1-0) 1001 NORTH IDAHO e APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 PZ-3-86 ORDINANCE 4, CITY COUNCIL HEARING MARCH 18, 1986 MEMO OF MARCH 7, 1986 PAGE TWO M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that case PZ-3-86, a proposed amendment to Sections 5.0101 , 16.0201 , and 16.0504 of the Zoning Ordinance providing for regulation of "adult uses", that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said amendments. As presented with the following amendments: 1 . Strike the petition clause in the amendment as written. 2. C-4 commercial districts are the only zoning areas where this is allowed. 3. No adult use shall be located within 1 ,000 feet of another adult use or within 1 ,000 feet of an establishment selling alcoholic beverages. Reasons for this recommendation are• 1 . Seems to certainly be needed in Apache Junction to keep a situation some people don't want from continuing or getting worse. 2. It's for the good of the citizens of Apache Junction. 3. Because the 500 feet apparently can't be changed to 1 ,000 feet because that would eliminate an establishment which might be a discriminatory thing, this would limit this but wouldn't eliminate it. Amendment number two and Reason number three were added by Mr. Taylor. Motion passed 5-1-0 with Mrs. Conway dissenting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The basis for Ordinance No. 486 is that a concentration of a number of adult uses in close proximity to one another could create a skid-row effect contributing to neighborhood deterioration through an increase in crime and a diminution of property values. The Ordinance also provides for a 500 foot distance between adult uses and extremely incompatible uses as residential areas, schools, churches, and playgrounds. In terms of the number of potential locations for adult uses, they would be currently very limited since there have been only 3 rezonings to the C-4 district. However, the C-4 district regulations have been in effect for only 12 months. Future potential locations could include all the areas shown on the General Plan 2001 Land Use Map as "General ", "Key" , or "Regional " Commercial areas, given the separation restraints. Our proposed ordinance, as well as many others in Arizona and across the country is based on Detroit, Michigan's ordinance which was upheld in the U.S. Supreme Court in 1976. PZ-3-86 ORDINANCE 486^ . .. CITY COUNCIL HEARING - NInrCH 18, 1986 MEMO OF MARCH 7, 1986 PAGE THREE A February, 1986 U.S. Supreme Court decision on Renton, Washington's adult theater ordinance has apparently expanded the authority of local governments to further limit the location of adult uses to a single concentrated area. If the Council wishes to consider the implications of this recent Supreme Court ruling prior to adopting adult use regulations, it will probably be at least one to two months before detailed analysis of the ruling will be available to us through the planning and land use law publications. OR fiFTy S ct�3��r/r'�111/77Z0 t/ Pep Corn/2 ` /. I `V-J• Section 5.0101 be amended by adding. ADULT USES. For the purposes of this Ordinance, adult uses are: 1 . ADULT BOOKSTORE. An establishment. a. Having as a substantial or significant portion of its stock in trade for sale, barter or rental , books, magazines, other periodicals, films or videotapes which are distinguished or characterized by their emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to "Specified Sexual Activities" or "Specified Anatomical Areas," or an establishment with a segment or section devoted to the sale or display of such material , or b. Having as a substantial or significant portion of its stock in trade for sale, barter or rental , books, magazines, other periodicals, films or videotapes and which excludes minors by virtue of age from the premises or a section thereof. 2. ADULT THEATER. An enclosed building a. Regularly used for presenting for observation by patrons therein any film or plate negative, film or plate positive, film or tape designed to be projected on a screen for exhibition, or films, glass slides or transparencies, either in negative or positive form, designed for exhibition by projection on a screen, or any type of viewing booth or equipment, distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas", or b. Regularly used for presenting for observation by patrons therein any film or plate negative, film or plate positive, film or tape designed to be projected on a screen for exhibition, or films, glass slides or transparencies, either in negative or positive Ao.i, form, designed for exhibition by projection on a screen, or any type of viewing booth or equipment and which regularly excludes minors by virtue of age from the premises. The following definitions are applicable to the definition of "adult uses" . 1 . SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES Human genitals in a state of sexual stimu- lation or arousal ; act of human masturbation, sexual intercourse or sodomy; fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttock or female breast. 2. SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS: Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, buttock and female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola; and human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered. p Section 16.0201 be amended by adding subsection (1 ) . Section 16.0504 (3) be amended and Section 16.0604 be amended to include the following wording: Adult uses, provided that a Conditional Use Permit is obtained from the Planning and Zoning Commission and subject to the following additional standards. 1 . No adult use shall be located within 500 feet of any of the following uses: a. Churches, synagogues and any other religious institution b. Public or private school or college c. Public parks or playgrounds d. Conforming or nonconforming residential use or any residential zoning district, unless a petition requesting waiver of this re- quirement, signed by 51% of those persons residing 30 days or more within a 500 foot radius of the proposed uses is received and verified by the Planning Director, then the Planning and Zoning Commission may waive this requirement. 2. No adult use shall be located within 1 ,000 feet of another adult use. 3. For the purposes of this section, measurement from the proposed adult use shall be made from that portion of the adult use, including projections therefrom, that is closest to the property line of any use listed in 1 and 2 above or to the property line of any land in any residential zoning district. 4. These provisions shall not be construed as permitting any use or act which is otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law. 41103 ORDINANCE NO. 486 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING SECTION 5.0101 AND SECTION 16.0604(3); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ^k SECTION I IN GENERAL The Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Ordinance is amended by amending Section 5 0101 and by adding to Section 16 0604(3) to read as follows Section 5 0101 Add ADULT USES For the purposes of this Ordinance, adult uses are• ADULT BOOKSTORE An establishment. a Having as a substantial or significant portion of its stock in trade for sale, barter or rental, books, magazines, other periodicals, films or videotapes which are distinguished or characterized by their emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to "Specified Sexual Activities" or "Specified Anatomical Areas," or an establishment with a segment or section devoted to the sale or display of such material, or b Having as a substantial or significant portion of its stock in trade for sale, barter or rental, books, magazines, other periodicals, films or videotapes and which excludes minors by virtue of age from the premises or a section thereof. ADULT THEATER An enclosed building a. Regularly used for presenting for observation by patrons therein any film or plate negative, film or plate positive, film or tape designed to be projected on a screen for exhibition, or films, glass slides or transparencies, either in negative or positive form, designed for exhibition by projection on a screen, or any type of viewing booth or equipment, distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas", or b. Regularly used for presenting for observation by patrons therein any film or plate negative, film or plate positive, film or tape designed to be projected on a screen for exhibition, or films, glass slides or transparencies, either in negative or positive form, designed for exhibition by projection on a screen, or any type of viewing booth or equipment and which regularly excludes minors by virtue of age from the premises The following definitions are applicable to the definition of "adult uses" SPECIFIED SEXUAL ACTIVITIES Human genitals in a state of sexual stimulation or arousal; act of human masturbation, sexual intercourse or sodomy, fondling or other erotic touching of human genitals, pubic region, buttock or female breast. SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREAS Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region, buttock and female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola, and human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered Aft. AsaIlk Section 16 0604(3) Add Adult uses, subject to the following additional standards. 1 No adult use shall be located within 500 feet of any of the following uses: ,^ Ir a. Churches, synagogues and any other religious institu- tion b. Public or private school or college c Public parks or playgrounds d. Conforming or non-conforming residential use or any residential zoning district 2. No adult use shall be located within 1000 feet of any of the following uses a Another adult use b. Any establishment selling alcoholic beverages 3 For the purposes of this section, measurement from the proposed adult use shall be made from that portion of the adult use, including projections therefrom, that is closest to the property line of any use listed in 1 and 2 above or to the property line of any land in any residential zoning district 4 These provisions shall not be construed as permitting any use or act which is otherwise prohibited or made punishable by law SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S Hill Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. David F Alexander City Attorney it ... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (i) eritIC • 31/44P ITEM # MEETING 0 '1'\\\ MOTION BY: 0.)3. SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER N,4EN1F/Z\ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL i/ UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES bL /t)/ ITEM # 1 MEETING OF a MOTION BY: 97M E SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR / COUNCILMAN BALJO V VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL i . UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET • NOTES 1 0/ )6 .0/, -, /i , j, 4 1.1 ))) kilt -ti tt , ' cOY oli 6. A i'Aid c • ITEf1 # - to- s' 3/ MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: E SECONDED BY: or YES NO ABSTAINED . COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR .0.. i . COUNCILMAN BALJO • VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL (/ N • COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER i _MAYOR HILL , UNANPOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL VOTE HEETS ROLL CALL 1151) NOTES Pij ..... rP(t ) , ,//71 . (tiA-lE ,FT oily ' ITEM # v MEET ING OF MOTION BY: N (,L SECONDED BY: 67,1 YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V COUNCILMAN EIDSON Vii COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER v/ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR 4 COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL / , UNANI"OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 7 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 486, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 486 BY TITLE ONLY. St 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 486, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 486, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: /11\ /. M , • l / ��rzo itt, of &ltipac e (,. unction March 13, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER e FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 489 (ELECTION DATES) Proposed Ordinance No. 489 has been drafted because of a conflict which exists in state law regarding the time frame for submitting arguments for or against a referendum measure and the deadlines for submitting items to the Pinal County Election Department in order to meet the mandatory deadline for the distribution of the required publicity pamphlet in advance of the actual election. Because Ordinance No. 469, as previously adopted by the Council , enables a special election to be called within 120 days after the filing of a valid referendum petition, a solution to this conflict can be found in Arizona Revised Statutes §19-124 (E) which states. "When a measure. . .is submitted at a special election, and time will not permit full compliance with the provisions of this article, the law providing for the special election oak shall make provision for printing and distribution of the publicity pamphlet." The ordinance you have before you serves as the "law" referred to in this section of the statutes and provides for the dates upon which the printing and distribution of the publicity pamphlet will be based. It would permit the submittal of arguments either for or against the measure up to the close of business on April 11 , 1986. This ordinance has been written with the emergency clause since it is necessary for these election procedures to begin immediately. Agenda Approved by Date Rom ; kmc Consent Agenc'l Public 1?ear;r c/s,1,' 7` Old Business New Business Postponed Rem 1001 NORTH IDAHO • . PACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 OPPIr ORDINANCE NO 489 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR A SPECIAL REFERENDUM ELECTION, PROVIDING FOR THE PRINTING AND DIS- TRIBUTION OF THE PUBLICITY PAMPHLET, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMITTAL OF ARGUMENTS; REPEALING CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCITON, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS. SECTION I IN GENERAL A. In accordance with the provisions of the Arizona State Constitution, Article 4, Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 19, Initiative, Referendum and Recall, and Ordinance No 469 of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, a special election for Referendum No AJRF-3-86 is hereby ordered to be held and conducted on Tuesday, May 13, 1986 B. In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 19-141 (A) , the publicity pamphlet for said special election shall be submitted to the Apache Junction Post Office for distribution on or before May 1, 1986 C In accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes 19-124 (E), arguments submitted either in favor of or against Referendum No. AJRF-3-86 shall be filed with the Apache Junction City Clerk no later than 5 00 p.m., Friday, April 11, 1986, in order to comply with nec- essary deadlines imposed by the Pinal County Elections Department for the printing and distribution of the publicity pamphlet as required by Arizona Revised Statutes 19-141 (A) SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1986 NORMAN S HILL Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 489 PAGE ONE OF TWO ATTEST. KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:kD VI F £NL .e.)\ City ttorney { I #00\ ORDINANCE NO. 489 PAGE TWO OF TWO ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ... 0 / A 1, V /), V �/ ITEM II l < MEETING OF 3 1S/ (Cacp0AN-1 MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: 61% YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO /I VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V V J CII LIVE COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR , I MAYOR HILL i 1 UNANI""OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL J ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / 60()') 4,( 51,K ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: ° SECONDED BY: l_s YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V MAYOR 0 HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 7.5 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 489, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. _(N_tE: Timms lion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY (, K-TO READ THE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE E RGE .. Step 3 1 MOPE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 489, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 489, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS. ,.. ,., ,i, („p.c,., ✓� „, --K, , 1 --__i / �R1zotP 'amity o &4pache }unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Agenda Approved by ,`f '' Date item # February 24, 1986 Consent Agenda Public Hearing MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Old Business ��0� r OP THROUGH: • J ICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER New Business77E f/ FROM: ;% Postponed Item -- SUBJECT: NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING P SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 4, 1986 MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - SUNRISE RV RESORT PZ-17-83 PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION. West Broadway Avenue, east of Ironwood Drive. SIZE: 35 acres net ZONING: Trailer Homesite by Planned Development TH/PD PROJECT: 484 lot RV subdivision, with recreational facilities and waste water treatment plant PROJECT HISTORY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PD APPROVAL: August 16, 1983 s ., FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: December 6, 1983 CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: October 26, 1984 (for the RV spaces) September 20, 1985 (buildings) PROJECT ACQUIRED BY PRESENT OWNERS (Sunrise Joint Venture) - December 31 , 1985 REQUESTED MODIFICATION As stated in the attached letter of February 7 from Randall L. Deming, they are requesting to accomodate 12 foot park models, a modification of the TH zone setback requirements for lots located at the intersection of two interior roadways as set forth in Section 15.0804(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, "Travel trailers and recreational vehicles located on spaces having common boundaries with two (2) or more interior streets or roadways shall be set back a minimum of twenty feet (20' ) on the entry side and a minimum of four feet (4' ) on the nonentry side from the nearest edge of a street or roadway". '001 NORTH iDAHO , APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CIT„WOUNCIL REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEr MARCH 4, 1986 PZ-17-83 PAGE TWO The applicant is requesting that for this planned development the corner lot setbacks be established as follows, "Travel trailers and recreational vehicles located on spaces having common boundaries with two (2) or more interior streets or roadways shall be setback as follows: a minimum of fifteen feet (15' ) on one street or roadway frontage and a minimum of four feet (4' ) on the other street or roadway frontage". STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Section 19.0106(2) (b) of the Zoning Ordinance provides that the City Council can permit interior setbacks different from those set forth in the base zone. Subsection (e) of this Section sets forth three (3) criteria to be used in evaluating requested deviations in base district requirements. The Planning Department feels that the requested setback modification would not be a detriment to the health, safety, or welfare of the residents of the development nor reduce the property values of adjacent properties. The Building/Zoning Department also has no objection to the request. RECOMMENDED MOTION I move that for the planned development and subdivision known as the Sunrise RV Resort, that the requested setback modification be approved as follows• travel trailers and recreational vehicles located on spaces having common bound- aries with two (2) or more interior streets or roadways shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet (15' ) on one street or roadway frontage and a minimum of four feet (4' ) on the other street or roadway frontage. CRN:jo ''` ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET // NOTES , VTdriLl \( ... Vi. , 77 ITEM # MEET I NG MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY r YES NO ABSTAINED `UN COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR 00. COUNCILMAN BALJO J , VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL , COUNCILMAN EIDSON / COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER �// MAYOR HILL UNANIM. US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 8 I MOVE THAT THE REQUESTED SETBACK MODIFICATION FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS THE SUNRISE RV RESORT, BE APPROVED AS FOLLOWS: TRAVEL TRAILERS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES LOCATED ON SPACES HAVING COMMON BOUNDARIES 'WITH TWO (2) OR MORE INTERIOR STREETS OR ROADWAYS SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN FEET (15' ) ON ONE STREET OR ROADWAY FRONTAGE AND A MINIMUM OF FOUR FEET (4' ) ON THE OTHER STREET OR ROADWAY FRONTAGE. Arip,CHs✓G✓ IO A 3 . 8,, j[;:::,;;;faz q� , c5ity o c94pache 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 20, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: , ;1 MICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: ',i')CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 4, 1986 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPOINTMENT There exists one vacancy on the Board of Adjustment for the term expiring June 30, 1988. Two talent bank -applications have been submitted and are attached. CRN.jo Agenda Approved by _AL - Date Item M Consent Agenda Pubiic Hearing :77., Old Business _5 New Business ✓ Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 � P?A ��}}CN�.x G-^- 1. j.~ii., .,* "4?/2.70% .,/may ej C7 pacize �, z ,,,..,i TALENT BANK APPLI CA I I Oi l FOR ‘-:</, c .'(' 17/7W/ezv.- /z‘e. /� BCARD/CoMrllssIo?i/COMMIT E_ / DATE. ..2-3- 2 NA_Z: J4,1W Th /c s TELEPHONE: j:P 2-(3-76/ (hor_e) // ' �� / (of__ ADDRESS: lam _WI 1� 4 J ' ZIP CODE: • 1"7:72/9 OCCUPATION: / ?FTi r ed ' '" 5<./,)ma's- /'- r (if retiree, please ineicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: /7//Gy Scry«Z //4�=/Q4lr. PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: riN ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INTORMATION/REFERENCES: vyd7V / ,-'7.s`;-,‘,_ /cir Le.Gc,t- NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recomnends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the cit/ for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. 7 / // I Rev_:;cd 6/19/3l Si,;' tare or r,oriicant 1C01 NCiTr4 IAA,O ;CAO • .?Ar'ac ,...,.-..... — I a pI 0014. /" , PQJGyO t ' ^ ySY A tigt ,,ii � t O ^ = _-; c--6 diPizoNp` it y olY 04pache unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Se?0412.L 0�- /-2ST 41s 7,1 irBOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: , a. Z c....7 / c�'C, NA1-fv: R /2 Tr kti, ,,To .[wJS Lfti TELEPHONE: (home) ,5Y-Z(3 c4-57 (office) ADDRESS: SS c, /,,i ia O ZIP CODE: 67,5" z i 1 OCCUPATION: /1/Wnu/4 C-E/z' (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: cir E) cc �--r e PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO -,3 �C- � UNITY ACTIVITIES: it iz c- tf� !. / G�wr its ,`�• ,r` h7'- Z/ t-Y , 1— S i Z i . 1= -o u' 1'.. Pc) tl erm—,S/ram C. IPL__n n,/L t/'t.., C G O,ti i tLf C C.4,`7'--7 1,✓1 t f S/D/'U ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: P1 NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council _ %..�1-_- - Revised 6/19/81 S= ture f �plicant� 1C01 NORTH tDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 PQACHE✓G -•. +. O 4((1r► 6 -,I , Y ,p/ZONP q c it y o' 04 pache o2unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION • FOR 676421 &1 pe_i 7,-Me,c1%1 BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 3-/a,- �� 9 NAME: ! rC 6: a c,66 s'S TELEPHONE: 9f - 027�O (home) /cro?-7(c/Z (office) ADDRESS: % S c --c aX ZIP CODE: c)/7— 0 3 OCCUPATION: 3c/( Z717A /L' e cl (if retired, please indicate former occupationpa/�� or profession) EDUCATION: 1b41 C 4 'c4 el'/` ,9 d'= . dl�..C?. ege PROFESSIONA AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: 4R/XGit, 4%?,7L 3e' . d,e~icl. ac ( toocl _ Azo T AlLS zV€.c- - ; #J 7f G&4 �.. sC 6tit`s C` fi'Lt'v' �"j!0''4c! '� Jc/ - Acts)j-c , y fi'le-rs..PeiL, I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON TH S BOARD/COMMISSIO/COMMITT4E DECAUSE < 14 (/ 4 r .--1 1¢`' �/4e et,,.. f%e- C.Y/z Octe t D " t ° ((, ' - _fft 'e . ---i. 1''—eu a cA- 1. 1 7 ,;,2, C i -tt. S ADDI IONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: C�7 IS /f.. ' -r-? —' co- , ,,77, .._A , d -(' / ....%ee/.1—` 44.,, NOTE: As a candidate to a l Board, Commission or Committee, your name, �t �Counci - address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. ?. I 4l S' atL of 6plicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACH JUN ON,ARIZONA$5220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 4/ ..... ,/i*',,,i i z A Vis- \ ,A )/,,,,, / \ \t° . / ITEM # (7\ MEETING OF ?� I0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER .... .),;4fiji \ I, COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO t VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON 4\\\k\ MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET e" NOTES (51,k RytiiJp/O-ljj fj ITEM # MEETING OF /d (MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: ) YE/S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER alkNOVAWNEW COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO 17/ VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL i UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL r In ilk ITEM NO. 9 ----- �_ _ I MOVE THAT BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS, SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1988. I\ Dec PQACHF JG2/-2 • O KIS 1zONP ity 04pache 09unctian FEBRUARY 14, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ,/ FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING: AB-86-01 RESOLUTION NO. 86-05 RELINQUISHMENT OF FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT AND VACATION OF DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY (AGENDA ITEM) Agenda Approved by Date item# Consent Agenda Public Hearing GENERAL INFORMATION Old Business j Per New Business Postponed Item APPLICANTS/PARCELS: JOSEPHINE CONNARD / 103-05-02 BYRON AND KATHLEEN SUTHERLAND / 103-05-015 'm. ALFRED SAULSGIVER / 103-05-018 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/PARCELS: NONE PROPERTY OWNERS OPPOSED/PARCELS: NONE STREETS REQUESTED: FIRST AND SECOND AVENUES FROM HILTON ROAD TO WAGONWHEEL ROAD, STREET CONDITION: UNIMPROVED AND NOT MAINTAINED. D.C.C. RECOMMENDATION: SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM DATED JANUARY 30, 1986. RWB:TAK:th File # AB-86-01 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 .......k rpy,c,,, A..., �GZZ U ,, i i*:"Piv. z - - - : / gRiZo� (Oily o Cipac, e r unction JANUARY 30, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: VICE CHAIRMAN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE REGARDING: RELINQUISHMENT OF FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS AND VACATION OF DEDICATED RIGHT—OF—WAY (AB-86—01 ) The Development Coordinating Committee reviewed the above application on January 30, 1986 and expressed no objection for the following reasons: 1. The roadways have never been opened or maintained by the City for public use. 2. The roadways are local classifications. 3. The use of property by the owners would be enhanced. 4. Adequate access to public rights—of—way would remain available. 5. Area transportation circulation would not be adversley affected. 6. All of property owners desire abandonment. cc: Planning Department RWB:TAK:th File # 86-01 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 RESOLUTION NO. 86-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS AND DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY ON FIRST AND SECOND AVENUES FROM HILTON ROAD TO WAGONWHEEL ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE #AB-86-01, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND VACATED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY WHEREAS, the requested abandonment and vacation are parcels of land located in Section 22, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows First Avenue and the North half of Second Avenue Federally Patented Easement The North sixty—six (66') feet and the South thirty—three (33') feet of the South three hundred sixty—three (363') feet of the West half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 22 EXCEPT the West thirty—three (33') feet and the East thirty—three (33') feet thereof South half of Second Avenue Vacation of Dedicated Right—of—Way. The North thirty—three (33') feet of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 22 EXCEPT the West thirty—three (33') feet and the East thirty—three (33') feet thereof. WHEREAS, the abandonment requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, and omilk WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, finds that said Federally Patented Easement and Dedication for public right—of—way purposes as described herein, are classified as local streets on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan, and are no longer necessary for public use as roadways WHEREAS, said easements requested for abandonment have never been improved as a public roadway and maintained by a local governing agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above—described Federally Patented Easement and Dedication for public right—of—way purposes are hereby abandoned and extinguished as present or future public rights—of—way BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the abandonment and vacation of the public right—of—way has no effect on reservations for public utility easements PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF ,1986 NORMAN S. HILL MAYOR Aft. 'oak RESOLUTION NO 86-05 PAGE TWO ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY CITY CLERK ,11014, APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID F. ALEXANDER CITY ATTORNEY I Amy. AB-86-0I CONNARD - SUTHERLAND - SAULSGIVER I SECTION 22 JUNCTION OR. w 1w w 18 w .... 0 0 CD J 610 Ist AVE // 1C) I3a I. CD CD = rn g C) 0 --i 15 G R a (3c e o • � 0g 9 0 0 2ndo Igo AVE ° �// lf/ � ,,vi� CD 18o rn z e 0 20 18A 0 22 0f 66' 33 3rd AVE t331@ C) 6, OD * *) ® 35 ' 4W U 4th AVE ........ 1 SCALE 14= 200' v A PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OTAX PARCEL NUMBER I AB - 86-0I CONNARD - SUTHERLAND - SAULSGIVER SECTION 22 1 JUNCTION DR. , `',' 1ww 18- 4 © 66' © � O ENOcn I3A D =i4o I4e ) L.), asiminm . ,,,,, Q0 FH e c q-€ 9 13B o 14A I4c / /# t) AVE. r U. ® 19a 188 8)) 411.:of 20 18A 41) I9A 66' 3 3rd AVE . 6• 33' . 9 37B 37A c.8. w 34 35 w '* 4th AVE. I SCALE I"= 200' f//A PROPOSED ABANDONMENT PAVED OTAX PARCEL NUMBER DIRT // PREVIOUSLY ABANDONED UN I M PROVED uniasimis 1mi4 6W {4, ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ( /° ' 0 ://((% ?;1/ ITEM # C6 MEETING OF 3 l'K MOTION BY: L;All-/ SECONDED BY YE . NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER Q Z . iCOUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL UNANI!". US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 10 I MOVE THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-05, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS AND DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ON FIRST AND SECOND AVENUES FROM HILTON ROAD TO WAGONWHEEL ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-85-01 , ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND VACATED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Pap,CHF✓ U (06( ) y z ''alPizot :aty o c padre ,o9uncticn March 10, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO:_ HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: `7,; CITY MANAGER FROM: , COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT: RESIGNATION FROM PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Attached you will find a letter dated March 4, 1986 from Deanene L. Weber, stating she must resign from the Parks and Recreation Commission. There are currently no Talent Bank Applications on file to fill this vacancy. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. /^ Agenda Approved by e� Date Item tt Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION. ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Oft\ Amok March 4, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council Members, Due to the increased study load of my senior year and other responsibilities, I feel that I need to resign my position in the Parks and Recreation Commission. Thank you for the opportunity to have been a member. Sincerely, Deanene L. Weber ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1, qA1)/r ITEM # t� MEET OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: �` Y S NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL / COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓J COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL UNANIA°0 S IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AM II. GZEffiliA ITEM NO. 11 I MOVE THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MS DEANENE L. WEBER FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET. Aalk J� ,iACHFF✓U2 '�R/zONP (iti, C4buche o9unction Awl 16. MEMORAND HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: /2- COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT f DATE: MARCH 11, 1986 SUBJECT: YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD MANUAL Staff has put together a Manual for the newly established Youth Advisory Board. This Manual will assist all members in understanding the operations and purpose of this Board. Highlighted in this document is a "Statement of Purpose", "Attendance Policies and Procedures", "Calendar of Meetings", and a "Membership Roster". It is recommended that you approve and adopt this Manual in order to relieve some of the administrative problems in dealing with such a large Board. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. Agenda Approved by 4=d* Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hear; g Old Bustress 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION YOUTH ADVISORY BOAR D 1986 MANUAL — / 1 City of Apache Junction ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 424, 9/3/85 AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 446, I I/5/85 CITY COUNCIL Mayor - Norman S. Hill Vice-Mayor Jim Bakkedahl Council Member Mari Gardner Council Member George Bali() Council Member Frank Jimenez Council Member Jimmy Eidson Council Member Ilene Taylor STAFF City Manager Michael J. McNulty Director of Public Safety City Clerk AVilliam McDaniel Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Works Controller Richard Broman Keith Lewis Director of Planning Director of Community Services _ Charles Newcomer -3elf Bell TABLE OF CONTENTS MAYORS WELCOME STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 2 ATTENDANCE POLICIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 3 PROCEDURES 4 CALENDAR AND INFORMATION 6 MEMBERSHIP ROSTER 7 I a / 1 WELCOME, YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS I am very confident that the action taken by the Apache Junction City Council in creating this "Youth Advisory Board" will assist our community by providing guidance in the area of youth services. You will be playing an important role in determining the needs of our community youth along with outlining recommen- dations on how to best meet these needs. Your recommen- dations will be thoroughly reviewed by members of our City Staff and Council, and with the best of our abilities, imple- mented into a working program. The City of Apache Junction is extremely proud to be associated with such a fine group of individuals, and looks for- ward to working with you on the very critical issues concerning our area's youth. I wish you the best of luck on your future endeavors. Sincerely, Ve�7 Norman S. Hill Mayor a a MINI l IMO STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The Youth Advisory Board will work to provide: * An organized force for unifying all the youth of Apache Junction by promoting understanding and communications; * A central clearinghouse for ideas on Apache Junction young people's wants and needs; * Leadership and involvement opportunities for all the young people of this City, through active visible participation in community events, projects and concerns; * Growth for its members, through assignment of responsibi- lities, accomplishment of Board objectives, and increased awareness of, and knowledge about the workings of the City and citizens of Apache Junction; * Service to the community, through volunteer work, fund- raising and charitable activities; * An advocate for positive progress in the role Apache -� Junction young people play - and are perceived to play - in the community. J 2 1 ATTENDANCE POLICIES Sc RESPONSIBILITIES Each member must: A. Attend every regular Board meeting and actively participate in Board functions and responsibilities. B. If unable to attend a meeting, call the City of Apache Junction Community Services Department, 982-8002, no later than S:oo P.M. on the day of the meeting from which they will be absent. This is the only way to have an ab- sence excused. .. C. A member may be asked to give up his or her membership after missing three (3) consecutive meetings without excuse. After the absence of three (3) consecutive meetings, the remaining Board members shall vote to retain or recommend to the City Council that the absentee member be relieved of his or her duties on the Board. D. Members of the Youth Advisory Board shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. A member may be removed by the Mayor with the concurrence of the Council. E. The secretary, at the direction of the Board, shall send a preliminary letter of notification to each member whose attendance records show deficiencies. The letter shall re- - Quest an immediate response from the member and warn the member that his or her membership status is in jeo- pardy. F. The secretary, at the direction of the Board will notify a member by letter when termination of membership for lack of attendance occurs. NMI MEI - 1 PROCEDURES I. Membership A. Board membership will consist of twenty (2o) members who shall be appointed by the Mayor and approved by the City Council. The twenty (2o) member Board shall be composed of twelve (r2) juveniles and eight (8) adults. B. Youth membership will be recommended by the Apache Junction School District consisting of two (2) represen- tatives from each class, grades 7 through 12. C. Adult membership shall be selected through the normal Talent Bank Application process established by the City. — D. Each current Board member must reapply for member- ship each year. He or she will not he accepted for continuing membership automatically. II. Terms of Office A. All members of the Board shall be appointed for the term of one (r) year with all terms expiring on June 3o and shall serve until their successors are duly appointed and qualified. B. Officers shall also be elected for one (r) year terms expiring on June 3o. C. Ex-officio members, without voting privileges, may be designated by the Mayor with the approval of the Council. III. Residency Requirements A. Youth members must reside within the School District boundaries. B. Adult members must reside within the corporate limits of Apache Junction. IMM NMI IV. Officers A. Flected officers shall be the Chairman, Vice-chairman and Secretary. Officers will be elected from the general Board membership. V. Duration of Meetings A. It shall be the responsibility of the chairman to see that all official business is conducted and completed within a one and one half hour time limit established for board meetings. This procedure is established due to the youths participation on this board. J 5 — / — FEBRUARY 13 Board Meeting 7:oo P.M. (City Hall) 27 ii II II am MARCH 13 II 27 II II 11 APRIL to II �4 �. II II — MAY 8 II " II 22 II II II JUNE t2 " " II mii II II II 26 JULY io II — �4 11 II 11 AUGUST 14 " II II _ 28 II " II SEPTEMBER rrII i. �5 OCTOBER 9 II II II �3 II II — NOVEMBER 13 II II II 27 Thanksgiving (No meeting) — DECEMBER 1 r Board Meeting 7:oo P.M. (City Hall) 25 Christmas (No Meeting) Apache Junction City Council Meetings are the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:oo P.M. in the City Council Chambers, tour North — Idaho Rd. Apache Junction School Board Meetings are the second Thursday of — each month at 7:oo P.M. in the Administrative Center Board Room, at Southern and Ironwood. — J — 1986 YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERSHIP ROSTER YOUTH Name/Address Grade Name/Board Grade Brian Harrington 7 Becky Winkle ro 2037 S. Buena Vista Rt. lir Box 1238-D Apache Junction, Az. Oueen Creek, Az. Elizabeth Henry 7 Jason Hutchens ro 2303 E. Superstition 1567 S. San Marcos Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. Steve Arnoldussen 8 David Umlah it 2575 W. Gregory 2646 N. Prospector Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. IMMI Sherry Martinez 8 Chrissy Smith rr 55o W. r7th Ave. 1365 S. Ironwood Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. Tony Lorenzo 9 Susan Pittman 12 544 E. Fred Lane 175r Buena Vista Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. Terry Lopez 9 Rick Rundhaug 12 Min P.O. Box 269 1376 E. 3oth Ave. Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. ADULTS Meribeth Baker Dennis Hultman ro435 F. Adobe Rd. P.O. Box 992 Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. Sofia Gargrave Norma Lebario 403 S. Cardinal 451 W. 23rd Ave. Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. Sheri Greves Deanene Weber r570 S. Coconino Dr. 551 S. Main Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. Betty Helowicz Paula D. Jager 724 F. Friar Ave. 1442 S. Desert View P1. Apache Junction, Az. Apache Junction, Az. 7 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES er:/Cs\ 5fr6 ITEM # � MEETING MOTION BY: AP' SECONDED BY: a- , /Y7 NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON s\j/7 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR v MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS I IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL `�. • ITEM NO. 12 I MOVE THAT THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD MANUAL BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS PRESENTED. i► it — \\\ PQACHj\4A_ sir ' o s.: r qR izoNP, c0zty o 'pache &unction February 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. CITY MANAGER,; 6 FROM DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATIONS (AGENDA ITEM) Previously the City Council had authorized the installation of street lights at various intersections in the City. To date, there are 29 existing lights installed, in addition to lights provided by developers and lights installed through improvement districts. Attached is an exhibit showing the location of existing City initiated lights and locations for proposed lights. Should the City Council wish to continue the program of installing a certain number of lights each year, further coordination will be required with the utility. Today' s cost for the installation of a 30000 lumen light on an existing wood pole is $330.52. Should a steel pole be required for installa- tion, the cost would be $958.90. Maintenance and energy costs for these .•, lights will be $6.62 and $10.70 per month, respectively. Historically, with the request to install lights, it has taken approximately 6-8 months for the utility to complete their work. In these regards, the following motion is provided for your consideration. RWB.s h ('�/� Attachments: Exhibit A Agenda Approved by K e. Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hsanng Old Business — New business JJ .`:0 !`3 Postponed Item File 100.051 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ddddd ►id d4d4ddd dddrddd ►Iddliddd . ddd ►Id ►I ►Idd ►Iddd4dd1dddad 'l � ddd ►Idddq 0„.,_ • vt C.... .. sii, DOC.... N.° JAG- . ....._,_ L -. .i . ..�.. . r ALIt.. �- I A � uJILL OIL- me 16 r • 'n— EXH 1 3IT • : P 1 jOt. 01+ °1J a o 41 Il 'L .. r. o ro �li 1) �4 i aft_ 1t ,� �� ' ► _.!1 rW.. 'I JAL. .1 _ ...4 4,N)-• . IF-L. - 40 • 1 • • • 01,__ y . 1 rr /I i. LiI, i_ JI o� � lit— .-46,.. ; • . • ! .. II ; -c.- , . .. - L ., .. .1 _ , 0 zit- AI i 2 r' ' r 1.� ,., I �� y 1 • r r u I __ . s • �, • ' I�'1Sl : �i .M/! ILt . • s 2�' ��/li lam ' • lI�AIAII�',� 1= � ��`) ■� . ate .... lial .x_ • ...tn.- . OFFICIAL .- 121, 112L- STREET NAMING MAP �` APACHE JUNCTION, �- -U" 32 I ARIZONA Jul- - 29 EXISTING "` I ...,,r,c/ _,,....,..�i r.la. ..- ----- 46 PROPOSED --• ��~ dddddddd44 i444d4ddddd ddddlidllddll Idddddlld ►ld4lldd1444d44444 dddd Ill dd4AI ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEP1 # MEETING OF POTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 13 I MOVE THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN TO THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER TO ORDER THE INSTALLATION OF APPROXIMATELY FIFTEEN STREET LIGHTS PER YEAR; AND THAT WITH INITIAL REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION, SPECIAL ATTENTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO INSTALL AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: P ikCHF 4O� �(,�� AlR/ZpNP meaty o 04pache )unction ... MARCH 10, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING: AB-85-15 RESOLUTION NO. 85-52 RELINQUISHMENT OF FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT (AGENDA ITEM - MARCH 18, 1986 AGENDA) GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANTS/PARCELS: TIM BAKER, GENE FRAHM AND KAREN FRAHM 100-25-15 RICHARD AND ANN HAWKINS 100-25-16B STREETS REQUESTED: CONCHO STREET FROM VISTA ROAD TO STATE ROUTE 88. STREET CONDITION: UNIMPROVED AND NOT MAINTAINED. D.C.C. RECOMMENDATION• SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM DATED NOVEMBER 13, 1985. Agenda Approved by C-- Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business f New Business "-WAPe File NO. AB-85-15 Postponed Rem 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 oak. Ash\ PQACHE✓/ 77---- U4 O d 'gRizoWx V'ity oi . Lpiache &unction DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER .� FROM: VICE CHAIRMAN, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTE j6 REGARDING: RELINOUISHMENT OF FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS AB-85-15 CONCHO STREET (VISTA ROAD TO SR 88) The Development Coordinating Committee reviewed the above application on November 14, 1935 and expressed no objection for the following reasons: 1 . The roadways have never been opened or maintained by the City for public use. 2. The roadway is a local classification. 3. The use of property by the owners would be enhanced. ...., 4. Adequate access to public rights-of-ways would remain available. 5. Area transportation circulation would not be adversley affected. 6. All property owners desire abandonment. RW3:th cc Engineering flivisinn Planning Department File No. AB-85-15 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 war RESOLUTION NO. 85-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY PURPOSES DESCRIBED AS CONCHO STREET BETWEEN VISTA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 88 DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-85-15, IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY WHEREAS, the requested abandonment is a Federally Patented Easement for public rights—of—way purposes described as parcels of land located in Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and more particularly described as follows CONCHO STREET — North Half The South thirty—three (33') feet of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 15, lying West of the West right—of—way line of State Route 88. EXCEPT the West thirty—three (33') feet thereof CONCHO STREET — South Half The North thirty—three (33') feet of the South half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 15, lying West of the West right—of—way line of State Route 88. EXCEPT the West thirty—three (33') feet thereof WHEREAS, the abandonment requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, or have access by a Federally Patented Easement which may in the future be developed, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, finds that said Federally Patented Easement for public rights—of—way purposes as described herein, is classified as a local street on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan, and is no longer necessary for public use as a roadway; and WHEREAS, said easement requested for abandonment has never been improved as a public roadway and maintained by a local governing agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above—described Federally Patented P\ Easement reserved for public rights—of—way purposes is hereby extinguished as present or future public rights—of—way. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the abandonment of the public rights—of—way has no effect on reservations for public utility easements. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF ,1986. NORMAN S HILL MAYOR ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER CITY ATTORNEY AB- 85-I5 BAKER , FRAHM , HAWKINS M W INDSC NG ST 33 ' a 1 1 0� ,..••••..-— — CONCHO ST. — ac / /// 4 � a IS I C I CC 00 Q-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1cx•0 -- - FOOTHILL ST. --- — �gx 33 19 � -1 1 22 a. D i 1 o 1 § -,ABANDO ED,, , ,, 1 66' 23B 23A 20A 1 1 1 1 SMOKETREE ' ,,,,_,,, ,,A BAN,.I .0„„ ,„„„ SCALE I"= 200' V�� PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OTAX PARCEL NUMBER '';/'1',°,,,, PREVIOUSLY ABANDONED I AB - 85- I5 BAKER , FRAHM , HAWKINS '" 1 W tNDSOM ST. i 33 66' 0 c0 0 co - - - CONCHO ST. - cciolyArtiore#5001:400,7' a i- cn j 16: 0 18 cc16A Oo a-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �- O -- - FOOTHILL ST. - - - a Y a.. 0 � 3 • '' - ' %ABAN(pO, ED'7 / ; 66' 23B 23A 20A I I � I SMOKE 1 R EE ✓,-, -.a BAN D•N -5 , , , ,-,,ij , . SCALE I"= 200' WZA PROPOSED ABANDONMENT PAVED 0 TAX PARCEL NUMBER DIRT •/1/'ill»f, ",','% PREVIOUSLY ABANDONED UNIMPROVED /" /'1 11111.1111111111.1111110111.1111111110 a. NIT Ilk .* ea ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 6()I ` c6 0 /hi r ' ITEM # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: .7 (\kSECONDED BY: 11,AY YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL , COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER _MAYOR HILL MAN I"^ US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 77w ITEM NO. 14 I MOVE THAT RESOLUTION NO. 85-52, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES DESCRIBED AS CONCHO STREET BETWEEN VISTA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 88 DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-85-15, IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . PQ AC HE✓G'lb z T �R/ZON� oitz� o C pache 09unction March 13, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAY&L AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER ��;44 , FROM: CITY CLERK / SUBJECT: RELEASE OF CONTINGENCY FUNDS FOR COPY CHARGES AND LEGAL ADVERTISING In preparing the City Clerk' s office budget for the current fiscal year, it was not possible to anticipate the demand for and the resulting cossts of items such as copy charges and legal advertising. As you are all aware, the packets generated for each of the council meetings since July 1st of last year have been rather extensive and have included many lengthy ordinances . The amount budgeted to cover this printing cost has proven to be insufficient in that the account is overexpended by $545 . 73 or 110% . Actual costs of packet printing to date are $3506 . 93 . Additionally, the amount remaining in the Clerk' s budget to cover legal advertising for the balance of the fiscal year is only $2114 . 67 as of the February billing. Since legal advertising averages $2500 . 00 per month, the balance of the budgeted amount will be spent before the end of this month. Based upon this information, I am respectfully requesting that the Council release funds from the contingency account to cover both the overages in the City Clerk' s budget for council packet copies and legal advertising costs . Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda _ kmc Public Hearing Old Business New Business 3� Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO a APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # I MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y/ YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER (� C N EPE COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ),(/, COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANI"1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Aismik ITEM NO. 15 I MOVE THAT FUNDS BE RELEASED FROM THE CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT TO COVER BOTH THE OVERAGES IN THE CITY CLERK'S BUDGET FOR COUNCIL PACKET COPIES AND LEGAL ADVERTISING COSTS. Ask PQACHE'✓ a r- / gRIZpN� it o % ,ache unction March 13 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR D MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK 4/ SUBJECT: SPECIAL REFERENDUM ELECTION I have received certification from the County Recorder ' s office that 3 of the 15 signatures submitted for verifi- cation on the sales tax referendum petitions (or 20% ) have been found to be ineligible. This amount will not have a detrimental effect on the petitions since a sufficient number of valid signatures still remain. Therefore, I am requesting that the Council give direction to take whatever steps necessary to conduct the election and to release funds from the contingency account to cover election costs of approximately $6, 000. 00 . A recommended motion is attached for you consideration. A confirmed date for the election will be presented at the Monday night work session . kmc Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business / ? Postponed Item ..... .— 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ..... ..•. d ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ,v,4) ....... '/\)v 0"/ ITEM # (19 MEETING OF S bi(1 ? PLOTION BY: C b VI SECONDED BY: L 7/ E NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER C N 1 J COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR / COUNCILMAN BALJO J VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL I I UNANI. .OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 6&P/11fritY Osj dfi, An'1101 Amok lY6i4J117; ITEM NO. 16 ; l , r I MOVE THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY CLERK TO PROCEED WITH ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO CONDUCT A SPECIAL REFERENDUM ELECTION ON V47 `kc li. AND THAT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,000 BE SET ASIDE IN THE NTINGENCY ACCOUNT TO COVER THE COSTS OF THE ELECTION. 2 // c 17 RESOLUTION NO 86-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION FROM THE STATE LAND COMMISSIONER AND SELECTION BOARD TO ANNEX CERTAIN STATE LANDS AS INDICATED BY RESOLUTION NO 86-07 Amok BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, are desirous of extending and increasing the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, to include all State lands located in Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 23, 26, and 35, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona; and all State lands located in Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Township 1 South, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona; and WHEREAS, it will be to the benefit of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, and to the State of Arizona for the planning and orderly development of these lands to be within the corporate boundaries of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to obtain the authorization of the State Land Commissioner and the Selection Board prior to annexing these lands, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AUTHORIZATION TO ANNEX STATE LANDS AS OUTLINED IN THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION BE REQUESTED FROM THE STATE LAND COMMISSIONER AND SELECTION BOARD. Passed and adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1986. NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. DAVID F ALEXANDER City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0 tir 7y)(frj 1 P r ITEM # I MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: CZt/ YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON 17 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER ✓✓✓ U I'� COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO I, MAYOR HILL UNANI"OH IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AMEMMOm ITEM NO. 17 I MOVE THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-07, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION FROM THE STATE LAND COMMISSIONER AND SELECTION BOARD TO ANNEX CERTAIN STATE LANDS AS INDICATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 86-07, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES LA' n 1 ITEM0, MEETING OF ‘511 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: '� Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON J COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER / F ntiti\-rarte-sallticin COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS L IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AIIIN ITEM NO. 18 I MOVE THAT AN EXECUTIVES SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M. , AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. , ON MARCI7,, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; ; I AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND ORKORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M. , IN (�-THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. A "t t VCO PQACHE✓Gtiti ik ►; 3° ':IR/ZpNP COity o p ache o9unction ^, INVESTMENT OF FUNDS FEBRUARY 18, 1986 Those Present: Lori V. Clark, Deputy City Clerk Noreen Mulcahy, Clerk Receptionist On February 10, 1986, the City Clerk's office provided letters to Merabank, 3160 W. Apache Trail , Apache Junction; First Interstate, P.O. Drawer F, Apache Junction, Arizona Bank, 6861 E. Apache Trail , Mesa; United Bank, P.O. Box J, Apache Junction; Valley National Bank, P.O. Box 29505, Phoenix, and Western Savings & Loan, 242 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, informing them of the City's desire to invest the sum of $1065,000.00 for a series of thirty (30) days. Each Bank was asked to submit a written bid by 9:30 a.m, on February 18, 1986, indicating the rate of interest offered on the dollar amount for the period of thirty (30) days. The bids, opened and read by the Deputy City Clerk, Lori V. Clark, were as follows: United Bank 30 days offered an interest rate of 7.70% on the total amount Valley National Bank no bid submitted Western Savings & Loan 30 days offered an interest rate of 7.85% on the total amount Merabank 30 days offered an interest rate of 7.54% '... Repurchase and 7.61% on a C.D. First Interstate Bank no bid submitted Arizona Bank no bid submitted , , // L.,r Lori V. Clark eputy City Clerk WITNES ' i , 7e 1 reen Mulcahy Clerk Receptionist lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 AN illp1/4CH - ,,,, t,„ __, ,, ,._„, ,, U ,1;, ,, y:�,► z \„\,,,„ ,c: ,.,„, v 'gRIz0,,. `,it1 o C vacate c&unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 27, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: 40( MI,CHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: //G "CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. L PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of February 11, 1986. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's office. p CRN:jl 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Ps PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FEBRUARY 11, 1986 7.00 PM WORK SESSION ON AGENDA ITEMS AT 6 30 PM PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS oink Mrs Davies Mrs Conway List in Mr. Heermans Mr Vanhoy Planning Mr. Taylor Office Mr Jorgensen Mr. Vehon, Chairman Mr. Class-Erickson, Staff Mr Newcomer, Executive Secretary Ms Ortberg, Recording Secretary SYNOPSIS Agenda dated February 11, 1986 approved as submitted Minutes dated January 28, 1986 approved as submitted SUP-7-85 recommended for approval PZ-1-86 continued to February 25, 1986 1. Roll Call Five members present with two absent as noted above 2 Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Agenda dated February 11, 1986, be approved as submitted " Motion passed 5-0-0. 3 Jorgensen/Davies M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated January 28, 1986 be approved as submitted " Motion passed 4-0-1 with Mr. Taylor voting present 4. Chairman Opened to the public SUP-7-85 and asked for staff briefing ,01114, 5. Mr. Class-Erickson briefed the Commission regarding this application of the Arizona Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists located at the Southwest corner of the intersection of 16th Avenue and Ironwood Drive to permit a new church to be constructed and two detached classrooms to be constructed at a future date, also to retain use of the existing building. 6 Chairman Asked applicant to speak. 7 Gilbert Anderson responded and answered questions 8. Chairman There being no one wishing to speak in favor or in opposition, he asked for Staff's recomenda- tions 9. Mr Class-Erickson -?..ecomimended that approval be conditioned on certain stipulations. 10 Chairman Closed the hearing to the public 3 Ammk 11 Davies/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Conditional Use Permit case SUP-7-85, appli- cation of the Arizona Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new church with two detached classrooms, retaining use of the existing building that the Commission approves said application. Any stipulations are 1. The applicant dedicate a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at the intersection of 16th Avenue and Ironwood Drive for roadway and associated purposes 2 Use of the existing building shall be limited to church related uses and community services, other than a parochial school which would require another Conditional Use Permit 3. Use of the proposed detached classrooms shall be considered principle use buildings for the purpose of religious education 4. The location of the church and detached classrooms be in substantial conformance to the site plan as approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 5. The applicant meet all applicable City require- ments, as well as, any other applicable regulations or requirements. 6. The onsite plan is reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division with respect to storm drainage retention. Reasons for approval 1. The application conforms to special uses allowed in CR-3 zoning Amok 2 The application conforms to the City's Gener, Plan. 3. It is compatible with surrounding CR-3 resi- dential land use and neighboring church uses 4. It will allow the congregation to continue and expand its valuable community services Motion passed 5-0-0. 12 Chairman Opened to the public PZ-1-86 and asked for staff briefing 13 Mr. Class-Erickson briefed the Commission regarding this application to rezone from General Rural GR to Single Family Residence Zone CR-1(MH). Also stated that this case has been referred to the City Attorney regarding the manner in which the parcels were obtained and if the splits are appropriate Recommended that no action be taken by the City Council until he has made a resolution of the problem if one exists The Commission could make their recommendation or continue this case until getting the City Attorney's recommendations. 4PWr_nEr 14. Chairman Asked the applicant to speak. 15 Jim Brinkman Stated that the Burkinshaw's and he used the same straw man in deeding those four parcels. This was also done in one day Stated that he would have no objection to having this case continued to February 25, 1986 /nk. 16 Chairman There being no one to speak in favor or opposition he closed this hearing to the public and asked for a motion. 17. Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "I move that we continue case PZ-1-86 to our meeting of February 25, 1986, at 7 00 P M in these chambers. Motion passed 5-0-0 17. Chairman Stated there was an item under "Other Business" and asked staff to brief the Commission. 18 Mr. Nakagawa Stated that there was a Commission-initiative authorized by the Commission responding to Mr. Stachar's request to allow some C-3 General Commercial Uses by Conditional Use Permit in C-2 Local Commercial Zone. There had been interest in setting a work session date before the hearing which is scheduled for February 25, 1986. 19. Commission & Staff Set the Work Session for Thursday, February 20, 1986, at 6 30 P M in the Planning Department Conference Room 20. Mr. Newcomer Stated under Information and Reports that the first meeting of the HUD Study Committee regarding mobile home standards will be held Feb. 12, 1986, in the Planning Department Conference Room. 20. Mr. Nakagawa Regarding the General Plan, he stated that Mr McNamara stated that it would be 4-6 weeks before having the second workshop for the goals and objective statement. Auk 21. Mr. Jorgensen Asked staff within the next two months to provide a map showing the location of properties rezoned by major developers over the past three years. 22. Taylor/Jorgensen M/S to adjourn. Adjourned at 7 45 P M Respectfully submitted, ar es R ewcomer, Executive Secretary ony e o , airman ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES /Li , k1/0 ())) ITEM # rkU - MEETING OF ° C MOTION BY: (-2111A)11SECONDED BY: NUAk YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER Ce'uki�raw�hz MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL GCMTIfte ITEM NO. 20 I MOVE THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P.M. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION �f REQUEST TO SPEAK ((�� /go NAME: "T(,V� .t�GCi`e� - DATE: It/ ADDRESS: IL/IE S- ._-L rovNA t'Od A AGENDA ITEM: / / AS- -_ �� — ! —may,,; /6 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 24FREP 3 SA U1-S G-i v t S 4) DATE: 3 "` ADDRESS: 3O / /_% 94'I V/f. , �'AC-%/ k%t//vr-J vA.- ( A,2 AGENDA ITEM: 2/c) 70 Xe Q u.e s T o� 4 IIsND e,ti .E'4/1 l /S 7' 1e,0 A vp= z /D CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 0,<l t k/z"/'C a-a/ Et DATE: 7 iF C ADDRESS: /; 5— 5, 4<` 4r, /tee/' AGENDA ITEM: ra_ 4 o iCi ego Ai I I • tali wr MASTER STORM DRAINAGE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION I I March, 1986 I I Submitted to: t I CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Public Works Department 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220-0190 Prepared by: - ANDERSON-NICHOLS & COMPANY, INC. 4120 North 20th Street jPhoenix, Arizona 85016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 STUDY AREA 1 SCOPE OF WORK 3 EXISTING DRAINAGE 4 General 4 Major Problem Areas 4 3 PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHER AGENCIES 6 RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 7 General Maintenance 7 Public Awareness 8 Development of Drainage Guidelines 8 Dip Sections 8 Detention Basins 9 Drainageway (Channel) Improvements 12 1 TABLES Table 1 - Proposed Culvert Road Crossing Inventory and Cost Estimate 10 Table 2 - Summary of Proposed Detention Basins and Cost Estimate 11 Table 3 - Cost Estimate - Summary of Proposed Improvements 14 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 - Drainage Area/Location Map 2 Exhibit 2 - Master Storm Drainage Study (in back cover) APPENDIX Appendix A - Apache Junction Development Guide Review Comments and Recommendations Appendix B - Typical Dip Section Crossing Type I and Type II t- - 1- 1- MASTER STORM DRAINAGE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION F INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the results of a conceptual level master drainage study of the City of Apache Junction. s STUDY AREA The primary study area for the conceptual master drainage study was the present City Corporate Limits as shown on Drainage Area/Location Map, Exhibit 1. In general, the area within the corporate limits is south of Lost Dutchman Boulevard, north of Southern Avenue plus Section 32, west of Goldfield Road and east of Meridian Drive. Of secondary importance and consideration in the master drainage study was the remaining area of the Township (Township 1 North, Range 8 East) beyond the present Corporate 1 Limits. Also considered in the drainage study were present and proposed drainage facilities as well as the offsite drainage area beyond the primary study area which might influence the master drainage study results. The drainage area contributing to the primary study area originates generally from the Goldfield Mountain range to the north and northeast. The flow patterns in the study area are generally from the northeast to the southwest at a slope of one to two percent. The study area is trisected by West Apache Trail, North Apache Trail, and U.S. Highway 60-89 (see Drainage Area/Location Map, Exhibit 1) . Flow in the area north of US 60-89 west of North Apache Trail and south and west of US 60-89 is characterized by a network of shallow, braided, low-capacity washes. These characteristics are typical of alluvial fan type channels. Alluvial fan flooding is characterized by broad, shallow flooding with a high degree of sediment transport, resulting in the small capacity washes changing course during storm events. -1- „:ti .E u� 1 ' T7tir r �'\.�f "� \tf'f � ”' ( .. '`. 'f. ,:.c i� ,�-ram''•• , '' ""'�.�;� . -.... cif NillP 'r . l z o) . ,1 v 0`Ir l F l�,0 ,� .sue_ H .1 ]5 * �qy, , r sue-. i h._ :'—',6V.:....: e o o i f e p 1 ,. N.,-k„,s... . zR rho"``..•.... ,� ,,., p . ' -•.- .;. Y''L�•:��i.„�:v i J ti•f 17.10 C�a •(j:el J •�r� - :t�` 'f� pros. mot`!: e:o' "".` r LA k' +\5.�-.rc'NI 7 ,,,ig.G !,, ` A ,c'-r �` �*` ,�"7' ,` ,,a:•,. N p U N T A , N S ! �' ?�, Six ,,.�„ S'T G e „. .... .,„ :,uk4-4, 4. — ' a 4.Lti,.\;.41%..A i.:.:- -.' . );17,..Nri.$•• log' • , ,„?•,,vit.;-„,„. ,,-;.....:v. • . ,-, / i' I 4,:,-,,N .1%,0‘..y . v,t' q4,.-V;AI,A#414&I, .-1:11,,„- . : 7--?,- ' .,..-,'"fr.,, 's,,-: c.'ll ' •'- 7J « ,_ .s. • .s 1 �. a "▪ .t t 4 .{', y; Ira 4 .,...t. , ..„ r41,V.„..- , . •"---it..- "•zi:k*i•-' ''isNif*,,, .04i,Wie-Y '',',"..44,-,4 -7;'..1`.,74..., ,. ..,,A \,,, . 4 . . � ms t�i 46,.. ,..- ....i. i--, ----,-, . .....(.4,.,,, ��r &XSni Cr ,e] ;y � ry4la J - r� � � .�� `�2�P '(�1"� i • �^„d 7" •�� '`r �re��r��,�+ .. 1�d � � f -vrrc— y �• : � J}ti Ycv y .. '_1r hf',,• ^ff a n ••� .. 2 t 4:.".ri -1 NRty� fi,, ti Ws •2 + Ff� �.c i °dRB�'An‘ � V" tits•.. z i E " ,� Y zj I. y.- `..`s'� "1 ▪ t. PtA,V Gawk"' 1 -urr ,.4.4M - 4 -, ui ,' WEEN'S WASH GrAM F �n�y C �i •_ . C:aN(�c. ,. "f• ` x ., , I II • r Mg j } o r L T Du Cy,MAN ,.. il i ., ,.ri' `L; 18 " ty, •K-, Zr �_ �E'6 s / .i�2 13 1 Lit �' fa, ' "`Apr. fes' g `` 3 J ,4";'J ` 'k ft �..D. P£RST/T/ON ( ,a te �- t .-� r III l1� '-✓ v l , , � /f ,- t -r• :Ei z I:G „r� ,.4 qC _ t i ., :L= �- -,r/ cat- �r > [n� � � Z L•'� .' �� `1 �". 5_ '4 T3 �r ;e J • - ,,2..,r (fra-�eL,. •4'• 7�' .1117 3r' f `. 13 :< 0i !` fr ilk" ` Ai" i ,.. •F , L=irr 7 e,"' �F'r b IxK ARA :i ) ;tt Tom\ f _ .,;, ,'4 'l r tV • iti, z►a�r.i_ yk` °i. •E �i� ; rr �7", 'R �'tp � B OADf��JY - _ .. N ; . qQLr . . /'7 ` • � Nir, ,, . i, is \ i )k irt. Y '' ' ' �. k' .`'PA C H �y } . '�� T6 : I T� z� ' ` : _ Mom\ _ $• ..,.U.- THERN .Iff//l o \' " Z`5 Z 3 `16U.n r \`^,lr; , 'Jl T ,4\ ! 3r{,.''"*7—63f1'f M1 }i.; \5 35 ]c _ E . Q'•? i,(' :-.M ' Q{-Lam-,,,, - `.cli , ... .. - ct T r S f 45 a F • „T. v� R7E1 R8E �` �-t,. ---- __. m3 ° I I 2 EXHIBIT 1 SCALE IN MILES I CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY DRAINAGE AREA / LOCATION MAP 1 The area east of North Apache Trail and US 60-89 has a network of larger } capacity washes, less braided with more defined flow paths. Breakouts between washes are still evident in this area during higher runoff events. Weekes Wash, the major wash in the study area, is located in this area. 1 Development has occurred in the primary study area over the last twenty to thirty years. Dense development has occurred in the area nearest US 60-89 west of approximately Idaho Road. The area further north and the area east from this corridor is sparsely developed. A large portion of the development occurred prior to incorporation with inadequate provisions made for drainage through the developed areas. The results of the inadequate drainage } provisions are areas with persistent flooding problems. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work for the conceptual drainage study as understood by Anderson-Nichols is summarized below: 1 . Locate and identify existing drainage problems. 2. Evaluate affect of proposed Soil Conservation Service (SCS) flood control structures (Bulldog and Apache Junction) on downstream flooding problems. 1 3. Concentrate drainage study mainly within primary study area (present City boundary) with minimal effort devoted to secondary area (remaining township area, Township 1 North, Range 8 East) . 4. Study should evaluate proposed improvements based on assumption that SCS structures (Bulldog and Apache Junction, dams and floodways) are in place, since design is well underway and construction is fairly certain to be complete in one to two years. 5. Evaluate and make recommendations on improvements to existing drainage problems with emphasis toward: a) Proposed improvements within existing right-of-way, b) Low cost surface channel improvements, and c) Improvement of dip section crossings. -3- I 8. Develop preferred or recommended drainage improvement plan including: a) Five—year recommended implementation plan b) Conceptual level cost estimate (possibly basing cost of repetitive improvements such as dip section crossings on a typical dip section cost estimate) . EXISTING DRAINAGE General: The City of Apache Junction is built upon the alluvial fans of the Goldfield Mountains. The drainage within the corporate limits flows from northeast to southwest at a slope of one to two percent. The natural drainage system consists of a dense network of braided channels of small to medium capacity. = Flooding is characterized by broad, shallow flooding with a high degree of sediment transport, which can result in the capacity of the small washes being exceeded causing sheetflow and water course changes during storm events. 4 Weekes Wash, in the eastern portion of the corporate limits is the largest wash in the study area. It is characterized as an alluvial fan type of wash, but having a greater flow capacity than the other washes in the area. The majority of the Weekes Wash drainage area is outside the corporate limits (10.5 square miles) . 1 Major Problem Areas: Three major types of drainage problems exist in the study area: wash crossings of major streets, inadequate conveyance paths for offsite flows, and ponding of runoff on the upstream side of West Apache Trail (west of Idaho Road) . Major streets have been barricaded during and following significant rainstorms because of flow depths over the roadways. Frequently closed streets are Meridian Drive just north of Superstition Boulevard, Superstition Boulevard just east of Ironwood Drive, and Ironwood Drive at west 16th Avenue. Other street closures have occurred on every mile street in the primary study area except Goldfield and Baseline Roads. -4- t ' I Seven general areas in the primary study area that have had significant flooding problems due to inadequate conveyance through the development (see Exhibit 2) are: d 1. Northeast of Meridian Drive and Broadway Avenue, 2. Southeast of Virginia Street and Pinyon Drive, 3. Shiprock Street and Delaware Drive, 4. Saguaro Drive north of West Apache Trail, 5. Ironwood Drive at 14th Avenue, 6. Southwest of Monterey Drive and 20th Avenue, and 7. Northwest of Southern Avenue and Tomahawk Road. Weekes Wash traverses the eastern half of the City and crosses eleven streets upstream of US 60-89. Each of these streets have been sub3ect to flooding that has interrupted transportation in the past. The City of Apache Jucntion Flood Insurance Study performed a detailed study of Weekes Wash upstream of approximately Scenic Street and identified the 100-year floodplain and floodway. Below approximately Scenic Street, the study performed an approximate study and identified an approximate 100-year floodplain boundary. The area of Weekes Wash below Highway 60 is shown on the flood insurance study to be contained within and existing channel. The channel below Highway 60 includes unarmored earthen levees on both sides of the channel perched above existing ground for a height of approximately 3 to 6 feet. A detailed analysis was not performed as part of this study to evaluate the capacity of this levee/channel section, however, significant erosion of the levee was noted on field inspection. Based on the field inspection, the channel/levee is suspected to be inadequate to contain the 100-year flood event because of inadequate channel size and/or inadequate erosion protection and freeboard '- provision on the levees. In the event of a levee breach during a flood event the area between Tomahawk and Weekes Wash above Southern Avenue would be especially prone to flooding because of the low lying nature of this area. The Apache Trail (State Highway 60) was built slightly higher than the existing ground with a limited number of culverts under the roadway for drainage. As development occurred along the upstream side of the Apache Trail, small diameter and capacity culverts were installed in the ditch running parallel and upstream of the Apache Trail to allow access to development. -5- 1 The third problem area is on the north side of West Apache Trail. As a result of the small capacity culverts and mild slope along the upstream side of Apache Trail runoff ponds in this area before draining through the culverts under Apache Trail. This condition which is somewhat volume sensitive will be reduced by the completion of the SCS Buckhorn Mesa flood control structures. t a PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHER AGENCIES The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (SCS) is currently building the Buckhorn Mesa flood control system which will intercept the overland flow from the Goldfield and Usery Mountains north of Apache Junction and re-route the captured flows to the Salt River to the northwest. These structures, in particular the Bulldog and Apache Junction facilities, are scheduled to be completed in the next two years. The Buckhorn-Mesa structures will intercept the runoff from 68 percent of the existing drainage area above West Apache Trail between Meridian Drive and the } North Apache Trail and US 60-89 junction (see Drainage Area/Location Map, Exhibit 1) . When the structures are in place and the contributing drainage area reduced, the peak discharges along this reach of West Apache Trail will be reduced by about 20 percent and the runoff volumes will be reduced by more than 50 percent. The proposed SCS Weekes Wash Dam, located northeast of Apache Junction (see Drainage Area/Location Map, Exhibit 1) , just upstream of where North Apache Trail crosses Weekes Wash has been put on hold and the construction of the dam looks doubtful. The Weekes Wash dam would reduce the 100-year discharge at North Apache Trail from 6,432 cfs to 137 cfs. Weekes Wash flows into the } Powerline Dam, south of Apache Junction, would be reduced from 7 ,061 to 1 ,728 cfs. The Superstition Freeway is being developed along the mid-section alignment between Southern Avenue and Baseline Avenue (west of US 60-89) (see Exhibits 1 and 2) . As part of that system, the freeway will be either collecting offsite flows and concentrating the flow at designated crossing locations or -6- will provide adequate conveyance under the freeway at each wash crossing. The drainage concept for this area has not been solidified. The Flood Control District of Maricopa County is developing a Master Drainage Plan for East Maricopa County. Once their system is constructed,y positive outfalls will be available for flows leaving Apache Junction and Pinal County flowing into Maricopa County. A concerted effort needs to be made to insure that drainage paths are not altered to cause significant changes to the existing flow patterns so as not to adversely effect Maricopa County's Master Drainage Plan. The Maricopa County Highway Department (MCHD) is currently upgrading Broadway Avenue west of Meridian Drive. An intergovernmental agreement was reached with City of Apache Junction to have MCHD to design and have a box culvert extend from the County line east to Smyth Drive to pick up flows from an underground storm drain. RECOMMENDED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS General Maintenance: The most significant need of the existing drainage facilities in the study area is maintenance. The City of Apache Junction needs to insure regular maintenance of existing facilities. Existing culverts and channels need to be inspected on a regular basis and inadequacies repaired. In general, the existing drainage facilities are in need of immediate attention. Existing culverts need to be cleaned out. Sediment, vegetation, and trash deposited upstream of, downstream of, or in the culverts need to be removed so that runoff will be able to pass. Damaged culverts need to be repaired or replaced so that flow will not be restricted. The City needs to acquire easements for the existing channels so that regular inspection and maintenance can be assured. Because channel capacity is severely restricted by vegetation, channels need to have brush and trees removed from the flow area, and grass and weeds need to be kept mowed. When significant amounts of sediment deposition occur it needs to be removed from the channel or wash. -7- f I Public Awareness: A public awareness program needs to be undertaken to inform citizens of drainage problems facing the City and the magnitude of total solution. The citizens need to realize that the development in the past without concern for adequate drainage has caused many of the existing drainage problems and that trying to solve them by retrofitted solutions is a costly alternative. As new development occurs, even for single home construction, the City needs to be assured that flow capacity of the existing drainage paths are not being reduced by alteration, infringement or elimination. The building permit process for single home construction could be upgraded to include an } evaluation for compliance with drainage provisions. Development of Drainage Guidelines: } The Apache Junction Development Guide has been reviewed and suggested changes are indicated in the Guide in the Appendix of this report. Dip Sections: Dip section road crossings create problems for traffic ranging from 2 inconvenience to road closings, depending on the type of crossing and the degree of flooding. In many areas of Apache Junction, the existing shallow washes make it difficult to provide a culvert road crossing without major modifications to the channel and/or road profile. Two typical culvert road crossings were designed as examples of what could be done to pass flow across major streets in Apache Junction. A shallow wash culvert road crossing was developed for the area west of North Apache Trail and US 60-89. The capacity of this crossing was developed by taking the total 100-year discharge at West Apache Trail between Meridian Drive and North Apache Trail/US 60-89 after the SCS Buckhorn Mesa structures are in place and dividing that discharge by the number of wash crossings along Superstition Boulevard for the same reach. The typical culvert crossing (Type I) has four culverts which pass low flows under the road and for greater flow events the dip section passes the excess flows over the roadway at a depth of approximately one-half foot. The details of this road crossing are shown in Appendix B. A 36-inch (span) x 22-inch (rise) corrugated metal pipe arch (CMPA) encased in concrete was proposed for this shallow crossing to allow for a minimum depth crossing. It is not recommended that smaller size culverts be used due to the potential maintenance problem of sediment deposition, etc. -8- The deep wash road crossing was designed for the drainage area east of North Apache Trail and US 60-89 where there is greater relief available between the wash invert and adjacent ground. The capacity of this crossing was developed by using the total 100-year discharge at Superstition Boulevard east of North Apache Trail divided by the number of wash crossings along the street. The typical culvert crossing has a single 48-inch culvert with at least 2 feet of cover over the culvert. The details of this road crossing are shown in Appendix B. A summary of the number and type of typical culvert crossings proposed for the major mile streets within the City of Apache Junction is shown in Table 1. A low flow dry road crossing design for Weekes Wash was not feasible. The relatively shallow nature of the Weekes Wash floodplain does not allow for the design of a low flow dry road crossing with pipes or culverts to pass small dischrges, while passing the 100-year flood event over the top of the roadway. Because this type of low flow crossing increases the water surface upstream of the road crossing, flooding is worsened and low flows diverted from the existing condition floodplain. Detention Basins. Even after construction of the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) flood retarding structures, the ponding and drainage problems described above will not be fully mitigated. The detention basin constructed by Greyhound Park at the southwest corner of Delaware and Apache Trail intercepts offsite flows to the north. This detention basin will continue to overtop for the 5- to 10- year storm events without some additional improvements. In order to reduce flows in the drainage area above West Apache Trail runoff needs to be detained. Outflow from detention facilities would be small enough to flow in street curb and gutter sections to pass out of the currently developed area. This would also reduce the peak flows through the culverts under West Apache Trail west of Idaho Road, relieving the existing flooding problem. Five detention basins have been proposed for the area north of West Apache Trail. The basins were designed to retain the 10-year flood event with about 2 feet of freeboard and the 100-year flood event with no freeboard. For this analysis, the basin was assumed to be five feet deep, with 3 :1 side slopes. These basins could also be used for recreational purposes. The locations of -9- ... - __.�_. . __ .... ._..�..... ..._ .....r... ......»w ar.w... ,.......,. ,..,r,..,., ,....e..... a.y „ +..y1AY.r w.N.w+N...,. •wWrrM1 rKrrw.1 nY..ww... TABLE 1 PROPOSED CULVERT ROAD CROSSING INVENTORY AND COST ESTIMATE NUMBER OF NUMBER OF TOTAL NO. OF TYPE 1 COST/ TYPE 2 COST/ TOTAL STREET ROAD CROSSINGS CROSSINGS EACH CROSSINGS EACH COST Superstition Boulevard 22 8 $25,000 14 $12,000 $368,000 Broadway Avenue 13 5 25,000 8 12,000 221,000 Southern Avenue 11 11 25,000 0 12,000 275,000 0 Ironwood Drive 14 14 25,000 0 12,000 350,000 Idaho Road 18 18 25,000 0 12,000 450,000 Tomahawk Road 12 12 25,000 0 12,000 300,000 TOTAL $1,964,000 NOTES: 1 . Unit costs include a 25% contingency. r 2. Some road crossings have been combined into a single culvert where feasible. 3 . Culverts are proposed for within the present Corporate Limits on mile streets only. 4. Weekes Wash crossings are excluded from this table. I1 ,,.,.,.,. � I TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED DETENTION BASINS AND COST ESTIMATE EXCAVATION (BASIN DRAINAGE SURFACE VOLUME LAND $2.50/C.Y.) BASIN LOCATION AREA AREA 10—YR. 100—YR. ACQUISITION (CHANNEL OUTLET S. TOTAL NO. (see Exhibit 2) (acres) (acres) (ac.ft.) (ac.ft.) ($25,000/Ac.) $6.25/ft.) SPILLWAY SUBTOTAL COST PRIORITY 1 North and west of Greasewood Street and Saguaro Drive (1,500' Collector Channel) 333 7.2 20.2 32.3 $180,000 $130,000 $12,500 $322,500 1 $ 9,500 $ 9,500 $332,000 2 South of Greasewood 1 Street East of Gold Street (1,600' j Collector Channel) 144 3.2 8.7 13.9 $ 80,000 $ 56,000 $12,500 $148,500 2 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $149,500 3 South of Greasewood Street East of Monterey Drive 161 3.6 9.8 15.7 $ 90,000 $ 63,500 $12,500 $166,000 $166,000 4 4 North of Superstition Boulevard East of North Apache Trail 256 5.6 15.5 24 8 $140,000 $100,000 $12,500 $252,500 $252,500 5 5 Southwest of Corner of Pinyon Drive and c, Gregory Street 55 1.5 3.9 6.2 $ 37,500 $ 25,000 $12,500 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 3 TOTAL $984,000 NOTE. 1. Costs include 25 percent contingency. the proposed basins are shown on Exhibit 1 and summarized in Table 2. In addition, the basins were ranked in order of relative importance in alleviating downstream drainage problems for use in developing the implementation plan of construction. Drainageway (Channel) Improvements: 1 The proposed drainage improvements consist of regrading existing ditches along three sections of streets and construction of four new channels as described below: 1 . Improve the existing ditch along the east side of Saguaro Drive from West Apache Trail north 1,350+ lineal feet including approximately 50 lineal feet of 24-inch CMP constructed diagonally across Saguaro Drive from the northeast to southwest to drain flows to the west side of Saguaro at West Apache Trail. The culvert installation just upstream of the VFW Hall would be important in improving this drainage problem because, at present, flow must flow across the road to drain. 2. Improve the existing ditch along the west side of Delaware Drive from West Apache Trail north 1,350+ lineal feet. This existing ditch improvement would improve interception of offsite flows that flow into } the area southwest of Pinyon Drive and Virginia which has poor drainage capacity. 3. Install a new channel along the west side of Delaware Drive between Broadway Avenue and West Apache Trail. This channel would help drain the offsite flow that presently drains into the Greyhound Park. This channel would require some additional drainage easements or rights-of-way, one street crossing, and approximately four driveway crossings of approximately 36-inch size CMP. The channel would alleviate the problem of potential overtopping of the Greyhound Park detention basin and resultant flooding of the area northeast of Meridian Drive and Broadway Avenue. 4. Install a new channel along the east side of Tomahawk Road from 19th Avenue to approximately 1 ,350 feet south of Southern Avenue, a total _ distance of approximately 3 ,100 lineal feet. The new channel would require approximately two, 22-inch x 36-inch x 50 lineal feet CMPA' s across Southern Avenue. The channel upstream of Southern Avenue is -12- 1 proposed as an inverted crown paved shoulder with the 20th and 21st Avenue intersection crossings entering Tomahawk as dip sections. This channel would alleviate a flooding problem of the area northwest of Tomahawk and Southern Avenue. 5. Install approximately 800 lineal feet of new channel along the east side of San Marcos Drive across Broadway Avenue to convey flow to a more adequate outlet and alleviate ponding on Broadway Road west of San Marcos Drive. The crossing would require three culverts approximately 34-inch x 53-inch CMPAs x 50 lineal feet at the Broadway Road crossing. The new channel construction and regrading improvements locations are shown on Exhibit 2 and the cost estimate summary is shown on Table 3. S -13- 3 ` TABLE 3 COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ti DETENTION BASINS (see Table 2) $984,000 NEW CHANNEL San Marcos near Broadway 800 L.F. x $6.25/L.F. $ 5,000 50 L.F. of 3 @ 34" x 53" CMPA d (Broadway crossing) $88/L.F. $13,200 $ 18,200 14th Avenue 900 L.F. X $6.25/L.F. $ 5,600 110 L.F. of 2 @ 22" x 36" CMPA (Delaware Crossing) x $50/L.F. $ 3,000 $ 8,600 REGRADING Delaware above Broadway 5,500 L.F. X $6.25/L.F. $34,400 110 L.F. of 36" CMP x $56/L.F. $ 6,200 $ 40,600 Saguaro above Apache Trail 1,250 L.F. X $6.25/L.F. $ 7 ,800 50 L.F. OF 24" CMP X $38/L.F. $ 1,900 $ 9,700 Tomahawk near Southern 3 ,100 L.F. X $6.25/L.F. $19,400 50 L.F. OF 2 @ 22" X 36" CMPA (crossing Southern) x $50/L.F. $ 5,000 $ 24,400 ROAD CROSSINGS (see Table 1) $1 ,964,000 TOTAL $3,050,000 -14- 3 - IR I r I r 1 I I Appendix A I I } { APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND CONSULTANTS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PQACHF C ti Ofr) [1111; ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION . ARIZONA June 15. 1982 Amended July 17, 1984 STORM DRAINAGE POLICY GENERAL GUIDELINES 1 . All water which falls within the development from a 10-year storm of 24-hour duration (approximately 2.4 inches) must be retained within • T`i5�r-i-k9the boundaries of that development (includes street areaareaL1A The method of retention is left up to the developer and requires the approval of the City. 2. Streets must be constructed to carry the runoff from a 10-year storm © between the topos of curbs {-I-n-eases-where-the--peak-—flows--from--the- ro-e4'f -desagn—storm--exceed-the-street--capacity, -under-ground-pipes-of-suffie ment-size-to--car-r-y the-excess-must be- irrstal-l-ed-: Storm drains, when designed as independent structures, shall accommodate a 10-year storm. i (See Exhibits E through F). 3. The peak flows from a 100-year storm must be carried within the cross- section between finished grade at buildings. 4. Retention basins are permitted to a MAXIMUM of 3.5 feet in depth with MAXIMUM side slopes of 4: 1 and must be constructed so that storm water will stand no longer than 36 hours. They MUST be drained by pumping or controlled gravity flow. Percolation by surface spreading in a landscape area is an acceptable method with no more than twelve inches (12") bonding on the landscape area. Dry wells are not desirable but may be acceptable providing percolation tests are submitted and approval of the City is obtained. A controlled connection to a wash or storm drain is preferable. 5. Retention areas may be required to be covered by a drainage easement. If the basin retains water from a development which has a cooperative- type homeowners association, the maintenance of this basin must be done by the association. If the basin is to be constructed on a parcel of land which will not be sold and the maintenance responsibilities of which are not specifically defined, it will be necessary for the developer to install complete improvements on the parcel and to make necessary provisions for its continuous maintenance. • 6. Existing major water courses shall be maintained and may be required to be dedicated as drainageways and shall not be altered froA11 heia „/„f natural locations at the perimeter of the project. Undergr--ound A 'feet crossings for these water courses shall be sized for a 10-year flood -event , higher flows may pass over the roadway section., (Refer to 5 Bureau T P blic oads !-(ydraulic Engineering Circular 5, Sept. 1961 ). 7. Drainage and retention covenants must be described on the Subdivision Plat or an instrument to be recorded with the Pinal County Recorders Office. The required wording is indicated on Exhibit "B". 13. STORM DRAINAGE (Cont'd) 8. Storm Drainage Structure Deferment. Should the Q10 design of certain storm drain facilities require a large structure. (concrete box culvert or bridge), the following alternatives will be avail— able: A. The developer may install the full structure with the project construction. B. The developer may defer the installation of the structure providing: 1 . Street improvements excluding the structure are construc— t ted to regular standards, with the project. 2. Improvement plans are designed showing present and future provisions for drainage. Plans shall clearly define the limits of removal and replacement when the future structure is installed, and shall provide for the adjust— ment or relocation of utilites with initial construction. 3. Detailed plans are prepared under the stamp of an Arizona certified structural engineer, for the structure extend— ing full width across the ultimate roadway section. 4. Separate construction cost estimates, acceptable to the City, are prepared for the future removal and re— placement of paving, curb, sidewalk, etc; as well as the installation of the structure. 5. A non—refundable contribution in the amount of one—half (2) of the cost estimate is provided to the City for deposit in an account, specifically earmarked for the construction of future drainage projects. These funds may be drawn upon by the City at such time when contigu— ous private development occurs or when this construction can be interfaced with improvements initiated by the City, or other regulatory agencies. 9. Developments South of Highway 60 need not define drainage areas upstream of Highway 60 providing structures under Highway 60 are �— measured and a Q10 is calculated based upon the structure flowing full with a head equal to the existing highway pavement grade. 14. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd) PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT 1. A preliminary drainage report shall be presented with preliminary development plans. Engineering reviews may not be scheduled without this report which shall be on separate, letter—sized sheets with neces— sary maps and attachments. Handwritten comments on a plan sheet are not acceptable. 2. Delineate the boundaries of on—site and off—site drainage areas. 3. Indicate the drainage pattern of all existing and proposed streets and building sites. Label by number the different critical points • and where inlets/outlets are to be located. 4. Each sub—area is to be analyzed for the peak flow generated by a 10— year storm on the chart labeled "Peak Flow from Sub—Areas." Use the velocities, for time of concentration and intensity charts found in this guide. Use the rational method as presented in the Arizona High— way Department manual "Hydrological Design for Highway drainage." 5. Justify the runoff factor (C factor) used in the computations taking a typical lot cross—section and computing a weighted runoff factor using the following coefficients: • concrete pavement .95 desert landscape .70 asphaltic pavement .85 bare ground .25 building roofs .85 grass landscape .15 6. Place inlets wherever the flow exceeds the street capacity according to the charts in this guide. The inlets are to be analyzed separately and catch basin computations shall be submitted. • 7. Size the storm drains and submit design computations. 8. If storm runoff flows onto the property to be developed from adjacent properties, this must be described in detail. Drainage area, calcula— ted peak flows, and other pertinent runoff data must be presented. If the flow is in a defined channel, the channel must be improved. An 8—foot bottom to accommodate maintenance vehicles may be required. Special consideration of the use of open channels is to be given on each individual project by the City. The runoff from areas outside the development may be realigned through the new development. 9. Indicate the retention volume required by the formula: drainage area (acres) x C x .2 = retention volume in Cubic Feet. 15. PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT (Cont'd) 1 10. Maximum depth of basin shall not exceed 3. 5 feet and slopes shall not exceed 4: 1 . 11 . Use checklist design charts and forms provided herein (Exhibits A thru I). I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT A final drainage report shall be required if the `final development design changes from the data furnished with the preliminary plan. The same format, as previously described, shall be used providing updated data. Provide drainage covenants for recording purposes on the form furnished (Exhibit B ). I _ 16. RECOMMENDED CHANGES/ADDITIONS TO DEVELOPMENT GUIDE Insert No. 1 : • (This insert is not necessary or recommended if the City decides to pursue installation of the regional park/detention basins west of North Apache Trail). The exception to this requirement is for the area between the SCS Buckhorn- Mesa structures and West Apache Trail and west of North Apache Trail where the retention requirement shall be for a 50-year storm of 24-hour duration (approximately 3.4 inches) . Insert No. 2 : The maximum drainage that may be carried in a street is limited to 100 cubic feet per second (cfs), for the 100-year storm. Open channels, underground facilities, or additional detention must be provided to accommodate the excess. The maximum velocity allowed in a public street is 12 fps. Insert No. 3 : The culvert and a dip section together capable of carrying a 100-year storm to a maximum depth of 12-inches, with a maximum velocity in the dip section of 5 fps, providing ajdacent property is not adversely affected. Insert No. 4: 10. Inverted crown streets are not permitted, unless constructed entirely of P.C. concrete. ew.,. .......u..w vrw.+ a v. i r.i .n«a... ..v 11Y000.1 n4w.vwi�a A.WI.YNv r .�YNMry s.«w�«a i•1«.Yws.� ,.4Y,Ckv f •t« • it CD a- x 00 TYPICAL CULVERT ROAD CROSSING TYPE I SHALLOW WASH ROAD CROSSING S= O.o!5 Ft/Ft xl6i'+t.1 goat AY S- doi ' / t i g © oc' /Ft 6AvE, L.o4 i��I S=D.Do0�i1 5-o,.oI • ' v ///// /// �aa� - 41-4? 3e4Z2l /IMAM ' N CAMpA ! ! // t,l Otdr ME1-!-f 1451 iao' Za',� 50' .IQ� DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS 1) Culvert L = 50' 2) 28' pavement (minimum major street width) 3) 12 ' wide shoulder on each side 4) Q100 100 cfs; Qculvert 60 cfs; and Qweir - 40 cfs 5) Q100 50 cfs QUANTITY AND COST ESTIMATE CONCRETE: 25.9 sq. ft. X 50 L.F. X 1/27 X $110/cu.yd. $5,276 EXCAVATION & EMBANKMENT: Excavation 208.5 cu.yd X $2/cu.yd 417 Embankment 55.5 cu.yd X $1 .50/cu.yd. 83 PAVEMENT RESURFACING: 1__ 28' wide X [270' - 14.5' ] X 1/9 X $10/sq.yd. 7,949 CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL $19,725 20% CONTINGENCY (Design, Inspection, Incidentals) 4,931 GRAND TOTAL (Average each crossing) $25,000 TYPICAL CULVERT ROAD CROSSING TYPE II DEEP WASH ROAD CROSSING Ex16f1 J/1 �• I FILL (p 4 Olt (�5� ZO' coOl DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS 1) Culvert L = 50' 2) 28' wide pavement (minimum major street width) 3) 12 ' wide shoulder on each side 4) Q100 - 70 cfs, Qculvert 70 cfs 5) Q10 45 cfs QUANTITY AND COST ESTIMATE PIPE: 48" diameter corrugated metal pipe (CMP) 50 L.F. X $60/L.F. $3,000 EMBANKMENT: 950 cu yd. 1 ,900 PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT• 28' wide X 150 L.F. X 1/9 X $10/S.Y 4,700 CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL $9,600 25% CONTINGENCY (Design, 2 ,400 Inspection, Incidentals) GRAND TOTAL (Average each crossing) $12 ,000 QACHE ✓ O '3 .:«ir C CITY CLERK'S 'S OFFICE copy ,fi:.• . O DO NOT REMOVE 'IR/zONP c ity O pacl'ze 2unction March 13, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYuR AN u MEMBERS OF T CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS / U\ _.3 SUBJECT: SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE STUDIES Attached are copies of the sewer and storm drainage studies for your review. The consultant is scheduled to present these review drafts for your comment on Monday, March 17 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Study Session. During the interim, should any questions arise in reviewing these drafts, we would be happy to assist you. RWB:sh Attachments• Sewer and Storm Drainage Studies (2) File 100.05 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE copy x - DO NOT REMOVE SEWER STUDY FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION March, 1986 Submitted to: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Public Works Department 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220-0190 Prepared by: ANDERSON-NICHOLS & COMPANY, INC. 4120 North 20th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85016 SEWER STUDY FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to address the overall issue of the need for and implementation of a sewage collection and disposal system in a growing community such as Apache Junction. This issue is complex, both technically and politically. Two major factors were crucial to the outcome of this study; health impacts and economics. The health impacts are tied directly to the present and future rate of septic system failures and the threat that continued and expanded septic system discharges poses to groundwater quality. The economic issues are separated into future development issues and existing resident costs. There will be effects on both the existing residents and businesses and the nature of future development whether a sewage collection and disposal system is constructed or not constructed. The sheer cost of financing the construction of sewer collection and treatment facilities is a major issue. The remaining issues such as system and plant alternatives, funding options, policy development, and so on will follow fairly straightforward from the initial work and the result of addressing the above issues. We have attempted to mobilize all available resources to provide the largest collection of data from which to base recommendations upon. One area of data that was stressed is personal experience and knowledge that relates to specific issues of the study. To accomplish this, we have interviewed any public and private persons that have knowledge or expertise relative to portions of this study. In addition, we have performed the following investigations. ° Reviewed existing reports and other published data. ° Field inspected existing sewage facilities. -1- o Interviewed public officials, including the health department, adjacent cities, Maricopa Association of Governments, Federal government, and the City of Apache Junction. o Interviewed private individuals, including septic tank maintenance companies, operators of package treatment plants, and local developers. In the portions of the report that follow, we have attempted to address the above issues in sufficient detail using the data we have collected and with sufficient documentation to allow the City Council to make an informed decision on the future of sewage disposal in Apache Junction. The report is divided into questions and answers. The questions were posed by the City staff in the Request for Proposals for this study. What is the present failure/replacement rate for septic systems as compiled from Health Department, well pumper and septic installer's records? Conversations with pumpers and installers suggest that there has never been a septic system failure problem in Apache Junction. The Pinal County Health Department was only slightly less optimistic, citing approximately 20 reported system failures in the past eight years. Both private and public sources reported that, although isolated cases of system failures have occurred, the low annual rates have not alarmed County Health officials. A number of factors are thought to be contributing to the thus far low failure rate: o Life of system o Required alternative field/pit o Low density o Relatively high cost of water. Life of System Conversations with installers, pumpers, and Health officials indicate that residential seepage pits can be expected to last between 10 and 15 years, while commercial systems generally have 5 to 8 year life spans. Pinal County Health officials indicated that 80 to 90 percent of system failures have occurred in the old style hollow seepage pit systems. These types of systems are more prone to pore clogging and wall collapse due to the lack of lateral -2- support material. The current criteria specified in the Arizona Department of Health Services Engineering Bulletin No. 12, entitled "Guidelines for Installation of Septic Tank Systems", prohibits the use of hollow disposal pits and, instead, requires they be backfilled with 3/4-inch to 2-inch rock, gravel, or volcanic cinders. System life is sensitive to the presence of hair and other slow biodegradable fine materials which tend to clog drainage pores. Typical treatment for a poorly draining system includes injection of approximately 10 to 15 gallons of sulfuric acid in solution. This treatment typically extends system life by approximately five years. System life is also related to soil conditions encountered at the particular site. The anticipated 10 to 15 year life span referred to above applies in areas with relatively porous soils. In areas dominated by caliche, system life can be expected to be reduced by 50 percent. Required Alternate Field/Pit Another factor which has likely extended the system life is the requirement that alternate (or dual) seepage pits or drain fields be provided when new systems are installed. This requirement essentially doubles the life of a disposal system. Additionally, the ability to alternate from one pit/field to the other, thus, permitting saturated soil to dry out or rest, may extend the life of a disposal system indefinitely. Low Density Historically, Apache Junction has been a low-density community. As recently as 1970 the permanent population was only 2,390 ; by 1980 that number had more than quadrupled to 9,935 ; and by 1985 another 44 percent to 14,279. A review of 1985 population data and associated maps (and aerial photographs) indicates that the City's population is still concentrated in approximately 7.5 square miles (compared to 6.5 square miles in 1980) . The population has, thus, risen from an average density of approximately 1,530 per square mile to approximately 1,900 per square mile (an increase of 370 persons per square mile or approximately 24 percent) . A review of occupancy rates indicates that housing has kept pace with population. Between 1980 and 1985, the number of occupied housing units rose from 4,205 to 6,058. The average number of persons per unit dropped from 2.363 in 1980 to 2,329 in 1985. During the same period, Final County shows an under-5 population of 7 ,964 or 8.8 percent of the County population. The nearly constant residence density, combined with only a 15 percent increase in apparently populated areas , indicates that infilling or development of previously vacant pockets of land -3- or redevelopment at higher densities, has occured. This, in turn, suggests that both the 1981 Toups report and this report are somewhat optimistic as to the percentage and absolute square footage of developed land within the City. Closer inspection of isolated areas indicates that some areas are currently populated at rates in excess of 3,000 to 4,000 persons per square mile. This suggests that the capacity for a great deal of infilling remains. Relatively High Cost of Water The relative cost of drinking water is not only a function of charges per 1 ,000 gallons of consumption. Another major factor is the household income level. Major segments of the Apache Junction population are either retired with fixed income or low-to-moderate income. For both of these groups, water is a major expense and, thus, non-essential use is restricted by choice. Cooking, bathing, dishwashing, and laundry uses are voluntarily scrutinized and limited. Waste flows from these households are, thus, typically reduced and the loading on the disposal system is thus lessened. The life of such systems can be expected to be prolonged. What are the implications of continuing to allow large commercial and residential projects to construct individual package treatment plants or community septic systems? Health Based on current information, there does not appear to be a present health problem associated with allowing package plants or community septic systems. Only one package treatment plant, the one serving the Sierra Entrada area, is currently in violation of it's discharge permit. The owner/operator of Sierra Entrada is requesting an expanded permit from 60,000 gpd to 120,000 gpd and the ADHS techncial review is reviewing the application. The evidence is not, however, conclusive that there is no long-term health hazard associated with continued use of package plants and septic systems. Economics The future pattern of growth in Apache Junction will be effected by whether a sewer collection and disposal system is constructed. The present type of residential, commercial, and resort development could continue using septic disposal. Diversification of development in Apache Junction depends on its ability to attract commercial and industrial development. Septic systems and -4- package treatment plants (to a lesser degree) are land intensive and not very desirable to developers of large-scale projects. The development community considers many options when making project location decisions; at or near the top of the list is the availability of utilities service. An industrial project which is able to tap into an existing wastewater system is more likely to locate there than surrender 10 percent or more of its land to treatment facilities in a non-sewered area. Such areas are thought of as "non-productive" and, unless tap and user fees equal treatment costs and a proportionate amount of lost usable area (unlikely) , a project will more likely go elsewhere. A result of the construction of a sewage system will be an increase in land values. Mandatory inclusion of residences currently on septic systems or package plants would require passage of a city ordinance (Sierra Entrada would require condemnation) . Currently individual residences on septic are permitted under the terms of ADHS rule R9-20-212 which allows sewage discharge up to 2,000 gallons per day for an individual septic system. ADHS Technical Review Staff has interpreted this rule to mean 2,000 gallons per day for single-family residences with no minimum lot size, but 2,000 gallons per acre per day for multi-family and commercial applications. The present urbanization in Apache Junction is the result of this interpretation by ADHS, which has resulted in two types of development. The first is the proliferation of recreational vehicle and mobile home parks at approximately 8-10 units per acre in low-value and outlying land areas, and single family residences at approximately 4-5 units per acre in high-value land areas. What would be the maximum allowable density and an acceptable percolation rate for residential development within the various soil types? Where can these limits be delineated in regard to the existing or future street alignments? Density The current septic system disposal density standard of 2,000 gallons per day, discussed previously, was established in July of 1984. Discussions with ADHS officials indicate that this standard is under review and may be revised downward to 1,200 gallons per day before the end of 1986 . The result of such -5- a reduction would be a 40 percent reduction in the density of large-scale projects, and the virtual elimination of tri-plex and four-plex housing units. Duplex and single-family units would be virtually unaffected. The allowable density would drop to approximately 10 units per acre. Percolation Rates Percolation rates for design purposes have been adopted by ADHS and are as presented in the ADHS Engineering Bulletin No. 12. The required effective absorption areas which are associated with these percolation rates are minimum values. Due to the imprecise nature of construction, it is not unusual for seepage pits or drainage fields to display greater absorption areas. Percolation rates are generally a function of soil type. The United States Department of Agriculture has performed an as yet unpublished in-depth soils survey in the Apache Junction area. When this survey becomes available (possibly in late 1986), a review of the soil types for ideal sites can be Identified. How would remaining on septic systems affect future water resources in relation to augmenting water supplies by reclamation, reuse, and recharge? As discussed above, people on septic systems tend to be water conscious. That fact notwithstanding, it is not unreasonable to estimate average water discharge into a septic system at 100 gallons per person per day. With Apache Junction' s current permanent population of 14,279 plus 37.5 percent of the seasonal population (assumed at 1 .62 x permanent = 1.62 x 14,279 = 23 ,132), or an additional 8,675, the average daily volume of wastewater that could be potentially reclaimed and reused is currently 2.3 million gallons, with a minimum of 1 .4 million gallons per day. A comparison of current water charges around Phoenix is presented in Tables 1 and 2, while sewer rates are presented in Table 3. Based on current major use rates, it is reasonable to assume that the City of Apache Junction would pay in excess of $30 per acre-foot to provide irrigation water for future parks. 1 .4 million gallons per day (off season, permanent) sewage effluent represents approximately 4.3 acre-feet of reuseable water, while 3 .7 mgd -6- (seasonal) yields 11.3 acre-feet during peak periods. Total available reuseable water would range from 1,570 acre-feet per year to 2,520 acre-feet per year. Evaporation rates around Phoenix are generally 6 feet per year, meaning that 6 feet of water could be applied to park land without threat of creating a public nuisance or health hazard due to excessive runoff from irrigated lands. Irrigated land capability would be approximately 260 acres of year-round maintenance (1,570/6) plus an additional 160 acres of seasonal maintenance. In Phoenix, golf courses range from 120 to 165 acres, or roughly 1/4-square mile. A review of the Apache Junction "2001 Land Use Map" (revised 10/31/83) indicates 40-acre parks at the corner of Idaho Road and Superstition Boulevard and the corner of Tomahawk Road and Guadalupe Road, plus large park areas (in excess of 1 ,000 acres each) to the north and south. Reuse to golf course irrigation levels would include chlorination. Recharge of approximately 1 ,600 to 2,500 acre-feet per year is a possible but less attractive option. Areas of subsidence can be identified for recharge. Such use of treated effluent would either preclude future irrigation uses for future parks or require purchase of additional water for irrigation. The treated water would essentially be lost to the City, with no benefits. Reclamation for drinking purposes would be both the most expensive process and a most difficult proposition to bring before the public. What options are available to phase development and construction of a sewage and collection system? Three basic avenues are available at this time: (1) Construction of multiple, phased plants with initial collection and treatment of those areas currently being served by package treatment plants and followed by phased expansion of the system to serve other areas of the City, (2) phased construction of a collection system only, with conveyance of sewage to the east Mesa wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located in the vicinity of Recker Road and Baseline Road, and (3) combination of options 1 and 2 which would involve initial delivery of wastewater to the east Mesa WWTP and delayed construction of a southwest Apache Junction WWTP until the 21st century. Construction of exclusively Apache Junction facilities would mean total local control of the project. This option would also facilitate targetting of new service areas by permitting greater flexibility in scheduling expansion. -7- Tying into the east Mesa WWTP (option 2) would mean that the construction of collection facilities could be accelerated because there would be no need to wait for approval of a discharge permit; the City of Mesa will already hold a treatment permit for the east Mesa WWTP (currently held by the Turner Ranch operators) . Permits are fully transferable under the provisions of ADHS Rule R9-20-221.6.1 . Acquisition and expansion of this plant is projected by the City of Mesa as occurring in the early 1990's. A long term contract with the City of Mesa would be required. Other parameters for this option include upsizing the Baseline Road interceptor between Signal Butte Road to the Apache Junction system, obtaining Mesa and Apache Junction City Council approvals, multi-city sub-regional operating group (SROG) approval, and the execution of an intergovernmental agreement between Mesa and Apache Junction. The east Mesa WWTP is currently operating at 400,000 gallons per day with construction underway for expansion to 800,000 gallon capacity. Expansion to 4-mgd is anticipated by late 1991 , with further expansions to 8-, 12-, and 16-mgd projected into the 21st century. An added benefit of this option would be that Apache Junction would pay a monthly 0&M bill which could be charged against reclaimed/reusable water which would recovered at the east Mesa WWTP. Also, Apache Junction would not be required to develop and support a WWTP maintenance staff (4 @ $18,000 average, including director) . Initially tying into the east Mesa WWTP and building an Apache Junction WWTP at some later date offers benefits enjoyed by either option 1 or option 2, but not both. For example, capacity at east Mesa WWTP may be available on a permanent or long-term basis. Apache Junction would then be in a position to reevaluate its needs at the 10-year mark. Discussions with EPA officials indicate that a 10-year lead time is more than adequate for plan, design, and construction of a Federally funded wastewater treatment plant. Conversely, Apache Junction would not be financially committed to a WWTP until the early 21st century and would be in a position to ease into a staffing capability. The east Mesa WWTP capacity would essentially be available immediately at the required levels. Again, the permit process would not need to be followed to acquire east Mesa WWTP capacity. The first Apache Junction WWTP could thus be more strategically sited. -8- What kind of wastewater plant would best accommodate Apache Junction's fluctuating summer/winter population? General. This question presumes that Apache Junction will install an independent system. A number of systems were considered for short- and long- term needs. Different systems are recommended for the growing and fluctuating needs of the City. Short-Term. Apache Junction's immediate needs may best be served by a non- mechanical, facultative lagoon. This method of treatment is land intensive, but it may be relatively inexpensive to lease or purchase raw land at the present time. There is currently an abundance of undeveloped State land south of Baseline Road which could be acquired through the Urban Planning process (a li year process). Although there would be an initial expense to acquire and make-ready the land, capital costs would be minimal (no mechanical facilities) as would be monthly operations and maintenance (no mechanical, no process-associated power charges) . Once land is acquired, expansion of an aerobic lagoon is simple, basically requiring additional pond space. Long-Term. The best long-term solution to meet Apache Junction's needs would be an oxidation ditch facility. Such a system is not land intensive and would ultimately make available for other uses that land which had previously been used for lagoon treatment. Also, the oxidation ditch process is easily expandable by initial inclusion of multiple ponds which can be left idle or put into service on a seasonal basis. This type of process tends to be forgiving of hydraulic and biological fluctuations. What alternatives are available for inclusion and assessment of present property owners who presently have a working septic or sewage system? Assessment of existing units would be by means of a monthly fee. This fee could be two-tiered: (1) A flat monthly service or tap fee based solely on type of facility (residential, commercial, industrial, government, quasi- government, etc.) , and (2) a variable user fee based on water consumption and possibly related to use (chemical process, domestic, restaurant, etc.) . These fees could also be seasonally adjusted to account for variations in demand on the system and/or occupancy (seasonal, permanent, transient, etc.) . -9- The problems of existing developments currently on septic systems are similar but different from the above discussed new developments. For these existing homeowners no monthly sewage treatment fee currently exists, although an infrequent but recurring lump sum "Honey-Dipper" service fee arises every year or so. These service fees range from $50.00 to $250.00 ($2.50 - $12.50 per month) depending on the quantity of pumpage required. For these people, a monthly sewer bill would probably seem like an entirely new cost, unless they were also paying $25.00 to $50.00 per month for installation of a new $1 ,000 to $2,000 septic system. In this case, installation costs for tapping into a sewer system rather than installing a new or replacement septic system might not seem out of line and would only occur once. However, at the same time as the homeowner is paying off a new loan for tap installation charges, he will also be paying for sewer service charges. This problem would be alleviated if the City were to install not only the sewer and treatment facilities, but also the service connections. The cost of installation could then be part of a 20-year (8%) bond package rather than a 5-year (18%) personal loan. Those areas currently being served by a package treatment plant (typically RV or MHP's) are already paying for an internal collection system, treatment facitlities, and monthly operation and maintenance costs as part of their rents. If these costs can be separated from other park costs the only new charge for these customers would be for monthly user fees and the cost of conveying the sewage from the package plant to the new wastewater treatment plant. What policy should be developed to fund new construction so that minimal costs will be incurred with future connections? New development faces two problems; (1) Providing an internal collection system, and (2) conveying the collected wastewater to an existing main. These problems are similar to those faced by existing development except that internal and external system costs can be more readily hidden or incorporated into new housing/development charges. Also, tap and internals costs are expected by new homeowners. In the worst case externals to serve a project should not exceed 1 mile of collector and should not add more than $10.00 per month to the individual residence. The legality of requiring new developers to either tie to existing mains or collectors with oversized lines, or to provide capacity for future upstream users must be determined but cannot be -10- addressed in this report. Subsequent user fees could be used to repay the cost of oversizing. Since federal funding is being reduced, what are some realistic approaches to financing, constructing, and operating a sewer system? EPA - EPA construction grant (section 201) funds are available for installation of treatment facilities, installation of intercepting sewer lines, and infiltration/inflow rehabilitation of existing systems under current law (as of October 1 , 1984) . State governors may elect to allocate as much as 20% of the state's allotment for projects eligible prior to October 1984, and then apply funds also to collection systems. Intercepting lines, as referenced above, have been generally interpreted by EPA as applying to those lines which discharge into a treatment plant. A review of EPA guidelines indicates a possible alternative to City of Apache Junction°s construction of an exclusively Apache Junction system. Temporary or permanent connection to the east Mesa wastewater treatment plant (EMWWTP) could result in increased funding eligibilities because Mesa is an existing system. Realistically Apache Junction can expect funding of only 40 percent of project costs, but project subsidies could then be extended to include the costs of a collection system. It should be remembered that the EPA is not fully funded at this time and faces further budgetary cuts under the Gramm- Rudman amendment. Also, expanded funding under this alternative is subject to interpretation and may be only a chimera. FmHA - Farmers's Home Administration (FmHA) funding would not be available for City of Apache Junction facilities construction. This is because the City population is now at 14,279 which is well in excess of the 10,000 maximum for FmHA assistance. CDBG - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are available on a limited basis ($100-250,000 per year) for small scale improvements but not for initial creation of a collection/treatment system. These funds are not generally awarded in consecutive years and should not be anticipated until a basic system has been installed. -11- What is the updated time schedule for implementation? Implementation decisions must be based on the City's choice of construction options addressed above (development/construction options) and on the availability of funding. Construction. If a decision to enter into a joint agreement with the City of Mesa is made, the City should move immediately into negotiations with the City of Mesa for the following reasons: ° Initial Apache Junction flows would likely enter the east Mesa system via the Baseline Road interceptor. This interceptor will initially serve a 1,000+ acre tract near Ellsworth and Baseline Roads, and is currently projected as a 15-inch diameter pipe with 3 million gallons per day (mgd) capacity. At a minimum, it would be necessary to provide capacity for an additional 2.0 mgd (off-season) and possibly an additional 5.0 mgd (peak tourist season) . This would require upsizing the Baseline interceptor to either an 18-inch diameter pipe (5 mgd capacity) or a 24-inch diameter pipe (8 mgd capacity) . City of Mesa staff feels the 1,000-acre project will begin construction within the next 2 or 3 years, and it would be easier and less expensive to make provisions for additional capacity at that time. ° The east Mesa wastewater treatment plant, currently being expanded to 0.8 mgd capacity, is projected for further expansion to 4 mgd by 1989 and 8 mgd by 1994. City of Apache Junction participation could easily mandate a more rapid expansion schedule. It must also be remembered that Apache Junction has grown at far greater rates than were projected in the 1981 study, thus, the demands on a new sewer system may grow faster than expected. Construction. If, alternatively, a decision is made to construct an independent system, the City must look closely at funding constraints. On the basis of health considerations, there is apparently no present threat to local water quality. This is not to say that the groundwater will not be contaminated at some time in the future. The primary concern of health officials is, in fact, that there will be a long-term threat from the infiltration of nitrates. Immediate installation of a sewer system will serve to lessen any future impact on the local water table and may even avert -12- contamination. As with the Mesa option, further delays will result in increased costs. Financing. Federal and State assistance is in a state of disarray. EPA funds are being reduced and may be eliminated by the next decade. CDBG funds will be, at best, useful for low-to-moderate income areas and are extremely limited (possibly $100,000 to $200,000 per year) . The City has grown too large to quality for FmHA funds. The most likely funding schemes will require the residents of Apache Junction to pay for 90 percent or more of the system costs. Again, delays will only result in additional costs. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Determining the need for, and the implementation of, providing a sewage collection and disposal system in a growing community such as Apache Junction is a complex issue, both technically and politically. The two major issues that we have addressed in this study are health impacts and economics. As a summary of the results of our investigations, we have compared the ramifications of implementing a sewer system now versus remaining on private septic systems for a generation (thirty years) . Below is that comparison. The results of constructing a sewage collection and disposal system are: Benefits: • Attraction of industry and commercial development. • Allows a higher density of development. Increase in land values. Negatives' • Possible increased costs to existing residents. Change in the economics of the RV resort industry if increases costs are a result. -13- • Increase in the density of residential development. The results of maintaining the present septic and package plant form of sewage disposal are. Benefits: • Maintain existing user costs. o Maintain existing form of development, lower density - residential and resort. Negatives: " Lower density development. Difficulty in attracting industrial development. Possible future undefined health issues, including groundwater contamination. The economics of financing the construction of a sewer collection and treatment system is tied to political forces. It appears necessary to provide sewer service to the entire City at one time. The cost of such a system would be approximately $46 .0 million, with an annual cost of $4.8 million including operating costs. The resulting minimum monthly cost for the existing single-family residential service would be $30.00. The cost to new development under a sewage collection and disposal system would most likely be equal to the cost of private septic. This is based on the need to charge new hookups a large fee to pay for the system cost. Having a sewage collection and disposal system would encourage development, particularly larger commercial and industrial concerns to locate in Apache Junction, even though in the past, development has occurred without a sewer system and is continuing at present. -14-