Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 07.01 City Council Regular Agenda PQACHF ✓ „ PLEASE FILL OUT AA'REQUEST TO SPEAK" IF ., Gti YOU WISH TO ADDRE.,.. THE COUNCIL AT CALL p, TO THE PUBLIC OR ON ANY NON-PUBLIC b- `I. _L►-'-, p HEARING ITEM. (3 .i N-vt fi".. 'ill{►a. Z 'I'P/ZONA �Dzt U . L;` �G�C�Ze unction APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 JULY 1 , 1986 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA (All items marked with an asterisk (*) will be considered by the City Council as a group and will be adopted with one motion. No separate discussion will be held on any of these items unless a Councilmember wishes to do so. In this case, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ) *1 . Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of June 17, 1986 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED VISITORS AND GUESTS AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CALL TO THE PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 513, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 457 LOT SPLITS 4. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 504, PZ-13-86, Application by Esther R. Brennan and Paul Gillett to rezone 5 acre, located on the south side of Junction Frive approximately 330 feet east of Royal Palm Road, from GR General Rural to CR-5/PD Multiple Family Residence Zone by .0.., Planned Development. (Postponed Item) 5. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 511 , PZ-21-86, Application by JAFCO & Associates, represented by Lowell Arnold to rezone approximately 1 .3 acres, located on the west side of Cortez Road, just south of Lost Dutchman Boulevard, from CR-1 Single Family Residence Zone to C-3 General Commercial District. /^ 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 512, PZ-22-86, Application by Ray and Lola Pershall, represented by Dennis Laubenstein to rezone a .87 acre parcel, located on the south side of Highway 60 approximately 600-700 feet east of Royal Palm Road, from CR-3 Single Family Residence to C-3 General Commercial District. 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEEDS 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) APPLICATION OLD BUSINESS 8. RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 457, LOT SPLITS NEW BUSINESS 9. VACATION OF MANZANITA STREET 10. COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CONTRACT FOR SERVICES 11 . INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PINAL COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 12. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-23, Recognizing Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc. , as emergency medical services coordinating system. 13. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR LIBRARY TELEPHONE SERVICE 14. ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM PERSONNEL BOARD 15. APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD 16. EXPIRATION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-1-84, ORDINANCE NO. 252 17. ACTION AND DIRECTION ON RENEGOTIATION OF CITY MANAGER CONTRACT 18. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, JULY 14, 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, JULY 15, 1986 19. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL 20. ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS." (-)sp,CHt✓G U �Ak �V ' Z 11PIZoIAP COit y o 04pache o9unction MEMORANDUM TO: CITY CLERK FROM: COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT DATE: JUNE 25, 1986 SUBJECT: BOARDS/COMMISSION RESIDENCY At the regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission on June 23, I presented them with the question concerning residency requirements for Board and Commission members. After much discussion a recommendation was made to the City Council that the residency requirement be changed to allow non-city residents to serve on Boards and Commissions. This motion was approved unanimously. (5-0) Please call if I can be of further assistance, 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 omik OM. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 17, 1986 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on June 17, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council „amok. Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hill called the meeting to order at 7.00 p.m. INVOCATION Councilwoman Taylor gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Mayor Bakkedahl led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL Councilmen Present- Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Taylor, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Eidson, Councilman Baljo, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Staff Present. City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Finance Controller Keith Lewis Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Public Works Rich Broman Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer /.16. City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Others Present. Mr. Gil Verley 620 S. Palo Verde Apache Junction, AZ Mr Keith Stachar 6301 E. Roundup Apache Junction, AZ Mr. John Granillo, Jr. 400 W. 23rd Avenue Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Jerry Burgess 349 5. Saguaro Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Ray Hooker 1507 S. Main Drive Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Joe Morvak 1590 E. Roosevelt Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Earl Laabs 1322 N. Goldfield Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Mark McPherson /ok 2471 E. Foothill Apache Junction, AZ Ms Midge Conway 902 S. Ocotillo Apache Junction, AZ Ms Charlotte Callahan 1980 W. Shiprock Apache Junction, AZ Ms Lydia Saldana 2380 N. Grand Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Bob Perrault 2237 W. Foothill Apache Junction, AZ Mr. John Roplai 3240 E. Alameda Mesa, AZ Mr. Bob Bogart 1 2748 S. Mariposa ' Mesa, AZ ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA ) ) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1, 2, AND 3 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. ^.. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. IIIIntroduction of Distinguished Visitors and Guests Mayor Hill recognized past mayor Wendell Clarke, Sandi Smith, and State Representative Roy Hudson. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Hill presented Certificates to councilmembers in recognition of one year or more of service. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Michael J. McNulty reported that the Library ribbon-cutting will be on July 12, 1986, at 9.00 a.m. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 2 OF 11 s CALL TO THE PUBLIC Mr. Gil Verley, 620 S. Palo Verde, Apache Junction, reported on the donations, and progress for the Library landscaping. PUBLIC HEARINGS /b. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NOS. 450 AND 457, LOT SPLIT (Postponed Item) ) City Attorney David Alexander stated that upon reviewing the proposed ordinances, it is suggested that Ordinance No. 457 is more in line with State Statutes. Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer outlined the process for lot splits, according to Ordinance No. 457, and staff recommendations and suggested changes in that ordinance. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the ordinance. Mr. Keith Stachar, 6301 E. Roundup, Apache Junction, representing a group of citizens, requested that a committee be formed to determine how Ordinance No. 457 could be proposed to benefit the whole community. Mayor Hill asked why this suggestion was not made six months ago, when the ordinance was initiated. Mr. Stachar replied that the request had been made to work with the Council on this issue, but were not afforded the opportunity. • Mayor Hill stated that he was not aware of this. Councilwoman Taylor stated that she had offered to work with a committee of real estate people on this issue in the past, but was not approached to do so Mr. John Granillo, Jr., 400 W. 23rd AmokAvenue, Apache Junction, stated that the ordinance had been defeated six months ago, and spoke in opposition to the ordinance. Mr. Jerry Burgess, 349 S. Saguaro, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in opposition to the ordinance. Mr. Ray Hooker, 1507 S. Main Drive, Apache Junction, spoke against the proposed land split ordinance, pointing out potential problems Mr. Joe Morvak, 1590 E. Roosevelt, Apache Junction, stated that this ordinance is putting a burden on the working people of the community. Mr. Earl Laabs, 1322 N. Goldfield, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in opposition to the ordinance, and suggested forming a committee to work with the staff on this issue. Mr. Mark McPherson, 2471 E Foothill, Apache Junction, spoke against the ordinance. Mr. Gil Verley, 620 S. Palo Verde, Apache Junction, stated that this would not be fair to the community. Ms Midge Conway, 902 S. Ocotillo, Apache Junction, stated that there are problems with lot splits and there needs to be a solution. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 3 OF 11 row Amok Ms Charlotte Callahan, 1980 W. Shiprock, Apache Junction, spoke on the proposed ordinance There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT oak, ORDINANCE NO. 457 BE POSTPONED AND THAT AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF SEVEN INTERESTED AND PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE BE FORMED, AND THAT THEY BE GIVEN 60 DAYS, TO END SEPTEMBER 2, 1986, TO SUBMIT A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS TO HOW TO HANDLE LOT SPLITS WITH OR WITHOUT THE ORDINANCE. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. Councilman Jimenez stated that this issue should not be postponed further, as the process has been simplified as much as possible. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl spoke in support of the ordinance, stating that should the ordinance be a detriment to the community, it can be repealed. VOTE: In Favor: Councilman Baljo, Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Eidson Opposed: Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill The motion failed. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 457, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. 'Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as /"1/4. follows: ORDINANCE NO. 457, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING ARTICLE III OF THE APACHE JUNCTION SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS BY SETTING FORTH STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND SPLITS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 457, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE DENIED. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE. In Favor. Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson Opposed. Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Jimenez Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill The motion failed. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 457, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 4 OF 11 PER MEMORANDUM DATE JUNE 10, 1986, AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, TO INCLUDE 1) SECTION 3.07.07 WHICH AMENDS THE THREE BLUE-LINE OR BLACK-LINE PRINTS FOLDED INTO A 9" X 12" SIZE AND THREE MILEARS, WHICH MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER BUT PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE LAND SPLIT MAP, 2) ADD TO SECTION 3.07.03 (4) A TITLE REPORT DATED NOT LESS THAN 30 DAYS PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF THE APPLICATION; 3) SECTION 3.07.04, TO DELETE 24" ose` X 36" AND ADD "AND LEFT MARGIN OF TWO INCHES", AND CORRECT THE WORD "EXISTING" UNDER ITEM 4; 4) ADD SECTION 3.07.04 TO ITEM 13, TO DELETE "WE HEREBY DEDICATE, ETC. PREMISES" AND ADD AN ADDITIONAL STATEMENT WHICH WILL BE INCLUDED "ON THIS MAP AND, AND THAT A SUBDIVISION AS DEFINED BY STATE AND LOCAL LAWS IS NOT BEING CREATED"; 5) SECTION 3.07.04, ITEM 16, DELETE "THAT ON BEHALF, ETC ACCEPTED" END OF PARAGRAPH; 6) SECTION 3.07.03, ITEM 2, ENTER A NON-REFUNDABLE $75.00 FILING FEE TO OFF-SET THE COST OF INVESTIGATING AND PROCESSING THE APPLICATION, Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. Councilman Baljo amended the motion as follows: THAT SECTION 3.07.04(5) BE DELETED, AND THAT THE WORDS "THE PRESCRIBED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA AND BY PINAL COUNTY BE USED TO DETERMINE WHERE THE LOT IS, HOW IT IS CONFIGURED, AND WHAT IS IT'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING LAND", BE ADDED. Councilman Eidson seconded the amendment to the motion. VOTE (on the amendment to the motion): In Favor. Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Taylor, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed. Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner The amendment to the motion passed. VOTE (on the original motion as amended). In Favor. Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Jimenez, Councilman Baljo, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill "In►, Opposed. Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Eidson I The motion carried. Mayor Hill recessed the meeting. Mayor Hill reconvened the meeting at 9.04 p.m. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 510, PZ-19-86, RUNDLE ) Mr. Newcomer briefed the Council on the rezoning of three combined parcels of 5 acres, located on the south side of West Windsong Street between North Ironwood Drive and North Gold Drive, from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone, and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application with stipulations. Mr. James Rundle, one of the applicants, addressed the Council requesting approval. Councilman Jimenez asked how many times the applicant proposed to split the property. Mr. Rundle stated that there are no plans at present, but it is limited by the amount of footage. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 5 OF 11 llorMIC Councilman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 510, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous Am\ The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 510, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-19-86 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE CR-2 (MH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 510, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT: THAT THE SKETCH PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWING THE PRIVATE EASEMENT PROPOSED, BE MADE PART OF THIS ORDINANCE. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: In Favor: Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl,'Mayor Hill Opposed. Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 509, PZ-20-86, SALDANA ) /'►. Mr. Newcomer stated that this is an application for rezoning of a 1 1/4 acre parcel, located on the southwest corner of North Grand Drive and Lost Dutchman Boulevard, from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone, and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning Ms Lydia Saldana, 2380 N. Grand, Apache Junction, representing the applicants, requested approval of the application. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 509, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 6 OF 11 Irmn City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 509, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-86, FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE CR-2 (MH); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 509, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 500, PZ-8-86, PERRAULT (Postponed Item) Mr. Newcomer stated that this application for rezoning was postponed from the May 20, 1986, meeting, and is a request for rezoning of a 1.5 acre parcel, located on the west side of North Main Drive between West Shiprock Street and West Tepee Street, from General Rural to Single Family Residence Zone, and further stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial. Mr. Newcomer explained that due to the protest petitions submitted, this ordinance does require a three-quarter vote of the council for passage. Mr. Bob Perrault, 2237 W. Foothill, Apache Junction, stated that the property would be split into three lots. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. Ms Charlotte Callahan, 1980 W. Shiprock, Apache Junction, representing protesters, stated that five lots 'domik would be too many for this property, but three would be agreeable, and asked if the applicant could be held to splitting the property only three times. Mr. Newcomer replied that the applicant would be bound to zoning district regulations. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl stated that the property could be split five times. Councilwoman Taylor commented that when considering a rezoning, the council must consider the density, legality, and zoning use for the area, not personalities. There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Bali() MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 500, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE- Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 7 OF 11 City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 500, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-8-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. „oft., Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 500, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: In Favor: Councilman Jimenez, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Taylor, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed: Councilwoman Gardner The motion carried. OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS ) Mr Newcomer explained that two terms on the Board of Adjustments has expired, Mr. Carter and Mr. Berry, and that Mr. Carter does not wish to be reappointed. Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT MR. ARTHUR BERRY AND JEAN PERKINS BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS, SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1989. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-51-83, WINDSONG MOBILE HOME PARK Mr. Newcomer stated that this planned development was originally Rainbow Valley, but has changed ownership and the new owner will be seeking major amendment to the planned development, but is now requesting an extension. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR PZ-51-83 IS GRANTED TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO SUBMIT THE FINAL PLAN TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION, WITH THE EXTENSION TO EXPIRE ON JULY 3, 1987. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 8 OF 11 01"*"" r rah*, Amok The motion carried UTILITY RELOCATION, 12TH AVENUE WEST OF CEDAR DRIVE ) Director of Public Works Rich Broman stated that there have been requests to improve 12th Avenue, west of Cedar Drive, and it is necessary to relocate the utility poles near the center of ,..... the right-of-way, for which Salt River Project is requiring reimbursement. 1 Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT THE EXPENDITURE OF $5,192.00 FOR THE RELOCATION OF SALT RIVER PROJECT UTILITY POLES ON 12TH AVENUE, WEST OF CEDAR DRIVE, BE APPROVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF RETENTION BASIN REQUIREMENT, SKIDMORE/ROTTWEILER II ) Mr Broman stated that Allen Consulting Engineers is appealing the requirement pertaining to the depth of the retention basin for the Skidmore/Rottweiler II retail/mail center and mini-storage project on Apache Trail and east of Thunderbird Drive. Mr. Broman further stated that the stipulation is that the retention basin be a maximum of 3 1/2 feet in depth and that the request is to deviate from that requirement. Mr. Broman informed the council that the Development Coordinating Committee strongly recommends that this appeal I be denied, as this maximum depth is for safety purposes, and all other developments have complied with the current requirements. Councilwoman Taylor asked why the developers wish a deeper retention basin. Mr. John Roplai, 3240 E. Alameda, Mesa, Arizona, owner of the property, explained that due to a slope on the property, it would be difficult to retain the water without a deeper basin, Ink. and further outlined the proposed project. Councilwoman Taylor asked about other alternatives. Mr. Broman explained one alternative would be to cut back on some of the buildings, and that the applicant was aware of the requirements initially. Councilwoman Gardner wished to know how the city arrived at 3 1/2 feet as a requirement. Mr. Broman explained that staff reviewed the development guides of other cities, particularly that of Mesa. ' [ Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE REQUEST TO LOWER THE REQUIREMENT FOR RETENTION BASIN CONSTRUCTION BE DENIED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE: In Favor- Councilman Eidson, Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Taylor Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed- Councilman Baljo REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 9 OF 11 The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-18, AB-86-03 ) Mr. Broman explained that this is a request for the abandonment of 1st Avenue from Acacia Road to Starr Road, and Solana Road from 1st Avenue to 3rd Avenue, except 2nd Avenue, and that the street is unimproved and not maintained by the city. ^^ Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY PURPOSES DESCRIBED AS 1ST AVENUE FROM ACACIA ROAD TO STARR ROAD AND SOLANA ROAD FROM 1ST AVENUE TO 3RD AVENUE (EXCEPT 2ND AVENUE) DESCRIBED IN STREET ABANDONMENT CASE AB-86-03, ARE NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS ROADWAYS AND ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT LIBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION ACT GRANT FUNDS ) City Manager Michael McNulty explained that this is a grant for the Library for $21,000 for senior services, which requires council acceptance of the intergovernmental agreement with the State Department of Archives. 1 Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROJECT AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT LIBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION ACT GRANT FUNDS BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED; AND THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE EXECUTOR OF SAID AGREEMENT. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion. /mik, VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, JUNE 30, 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, JULY 1, 1986 ) Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P M., AND A WORK SESSION AT 7.00 P.M., ON JUNE 30, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P M , ON JULY 1, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 10 OF 11 INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Mr. Bob Bogart, 2748 S. Mariposa, Mesa, thanked the council for participating in the Maricopa County, Arizona State Troopers, and the City of Apache Junction joint venture with a hazard plaguing all surrounding areas. /mk Mayor Hill acknowledged Mrs. Jimenez and family. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL None. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 10.30 P M. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. *Consent Agenda Items are as follows: *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of April 24, 1986 *3. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of June 3, 1986 ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. .0044. Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 17, 1986 PAGE 11 OF 11 slf ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES I loz 644 ITEM # 1 40} MEETING OF r7/Vga v PLOT I ON BY: cilmu SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR _ COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON J COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER ✓ COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ t� MAYOR HILL V UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 I MOVE THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. PUBLIC HEARING 1. FOR ORDINANCE NO. 513 2 . WILL COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE Ask Aft. O‹ PQAC,Her ✓G 0 U I 1 ` w z ' PIZoNP' cOity o p C ache 09unction June 26, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGE i' FROM: CITY CLERK OJ SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 513 The attached ordinance has been prepared and placed on the agenda at the request of Councilwoman Taylor. Adoption of this ordinance would have the effect of repealing Ordinance No. 457 (Land Splits) as approved by the council on Jun 17th. This item will be placed on the July 1st agenda for your consideration. kmc Agenda Approved by Jed-. _ Date Item # Consent Agenda � Public Hearing e. Old Business New Business _ _ Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 r. �� ORDINANCE NO 513 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING ARTICLE III OF THE APACHE JUNCTION SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS BY REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 457; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING rmk I FOR SEVERABILITY 11— BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS. SECTION I IN GENERAL That the Apache Junction Subdivision Regulations, Article III, be amended by repealing Ordinance No. 457, setting forth standards, procedures and requirements for land splits SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the pro- visions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof I PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1986. NORMAN S. HILL Mayor oink, ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES v3/jotY.., ITEM # ?WOO MEETING F MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO f VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL V ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES .);)( ()1 etv • ITEM # MEETING 0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO' ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR J COUNCILMAN BALJO f VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL V UNANITUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL J fa ITEM NO. 3 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 513, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 513 BY TITLE ONLY. S' I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 513, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 513, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 504, PZ-13-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE, AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6. IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE pyp,cHE de, qt ,zotO's cOitypace ����zc ic;� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 16, 1986 MEMORANDUM THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: e MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER THROUGH: CHARLES R. NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: 'JULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT : AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 3, 1986 PZ-13-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 504) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Esther R. Brennan and Paul Gillett REPRESENTATIVE: Robert W. Lake LOCATION. South side of Junction Drive approximately 330 feet east of Royal Palm Road CURRENT ZONING: General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING: Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development CR-5/PD GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium/high Residential Opportunity NO. OF PARCELS: one GROSS ACREAGE: five acres NET ACREAGE: 4.7 acres CURRENT LAND USE: vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - single family home South - mobile homes residences East - single family home West - single family homes SURROUNDING ZONING: North - Multiple Family Residence CR-4 South - Trailer Homesite TH Agenda Approved by East - General Rural GR Date Item a West - General Rural GR Consent Agenda Public Hearing efjq Old Business New Business -�� Q Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Mayor and City Counl - Agenda Item - June 3, 1986^Page Two SITE CHARACTERISTICS• major wash through the northwest corner of the subject site; corrugated metal flood drainage pipe of approximately 36" diameter constructed under Junction Drive exits onto property approximately center of front of subject site. PROTESTS Protests have been received which are sufficient to require a 3/4 vote by City Council for passage. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed subdivision is a 40 unit multiple family residential development. The units are townhouse/condominium type construction and will be sold as individual family units. The entrance will be located on Junction Drive at the eastern edge of the property. The two mid-section line roads, Junction Drive and Tomahawk are adequate to serve the traffic needs of this development. The subject site has a dramatic topography which the developer wishes to use to his advantage. The natural wash area in the northwest corner of the site will be preserved with the natural vegetation. This area will serve as an open space and as a natural buffer to adjoining single family uses to the west of the subject site. Additional open space will be provided near the entrance in the form of landscape berms , and at the southwestern corner of the property in the form of a retention basin. Both of these locations will also serve to buffer adjoining uses. Finally, interior to the project is a large recreational open space in the courtyard of the project. This interior open •space adjoins the indoor recreational facilities provided for the residents. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The planned development portion of the zoning ordinance provides that the City Council shall approve the amount and character of open space as part of the preliminary plan approval . The preliminary plan will be submitted to the City Council further into the project. The original request was for CR-5 zoning classification. After a conference with staff, applicant amended the application to CR-5 by Planned Development. The applicants have displayed attitudes reflecting their cooperation and flexibility to obtain a quality project. Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan Designation for the site. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the South twenty-five feet (25' ) and the North forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. Mayor and City Councy. - Agenda Item - June 3, 1986 :gage Three PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of May 13, 1986, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/ Vanhoy 5-0-0) . "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-13-86, an application of Esther R. Brennan and Paul Gillett for their property described as, a matter of public record, re- questing rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5/PD Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development. The stipulations are: 1. The applicants dedicate the North forty feet (40' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes and the South twenty-five feet (25' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. This does comply with the General Plan of the City of Apache Junction. 2. It does comply with the criteria of Section 19.0109. 3. It appears to be the best use of the property." STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE Applicants dedicate the South twenty-five feet (25' ) and the North forty feet (40' ) of the subject propety for public roadway and associated purposes. CRN:JAR:jl U!LG ��_ take e a I t y CORPORATION 11G Kachina Square 2066 W. Apache Trail, Suite 101 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220-3793 41 Phone (602) 982.1656 • June 2, 1986 Mr. Charles R. Newcomer Director of Planning City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Apache Junction, Arizona 85220-0190 RE. PZ-13-86 (Ordinance No. 504) Dear Mr. Newcomer: I hereby request a thirty (30) day postponement of the above-referenced rezoning application in order to meet with the State Health Department regarding sewage disposal. Although I realize a public hearing on this application is scheduled for Tuesday, June 3, 1986, at 7.00 p.m. before the City Council I would greatly appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, obert W. Lake LAKE REALTY CORPORATION RWL/mav inyn J J PS PZ-13-86 REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL GR TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CR-5/PD ....- Protest Perimeter CR-41 /7 — — _ _ I / MH MH !condos ' SFH Junction Drive I SF I 1 1 1 I I SF I I SF 1 I SFH 0 -v c I I v SF 1 a / 1 o I vac MH MH MH MH I TH --' —- --— � — / L Ammumn I UProtest Filed i E SUBJECT SITE 1---, I LIMITS or ZONING (REMAINDER IS CCNt'RAL RI; N i F I I0 300 600 PZ-13-86 REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL GR TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CR-5/PD a CR-4 SFH I condos I MH MH MH Junction Drive SF / power station SF SFSFH 0 o SF o r- vacant MH MH MH MT Ty � I ESUBJECT SITE LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RUR - ' I 1 I 1 0 300 600 (Ve 0 L''a Pi.,,,,,. e,.1 Pe eJet,J-1,2, 1,,....../2 4- • ,S..., . ( . J.....,...14WAr .0w.r..• P..,./..,..4 t . • ---....N ....... ) E.Vrot." I ...\. I , . 1 o I 1 1 -\\ . Cr I . 1 A Art.FAce,ry AOAK,,...,.., 1 '1 ' ,- e,..,,,1-7•4ocr 0. .. l N C.m men/ A RCA A NO PAR-TiAL • 4 ' E5c,..., A • j k2 . t ..• 4 , E Z E. hr ; 1,.._•....-•r....o..., A......r....o..." If Z. 0 1 DlIV,ma...Y Z _ I A . . Z il C't n 1.. 1 E.•137.,,e, lc,A i A/ /i...0 P4......sof•-..7 ,Z.9..0.re.4"...4,,CA 4 itETVerIOAl A Af A Pt . 3. 1 . - f I ---_ 4 1 I • I i __:._Fk.l•fla___c•.a....1,..,,,__ pf-r.d-d., ,or.vr- _ __ ) ) CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: T CR -5/PD 1. -1) Parcel No. 1 From GR To I 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for.' High Density Residential Opportunity Area. 3. Size of your property: 5 [x ] acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? Vacant 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North Condominiums & Home South Mobile Home East Home West Homes 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? 101-22-007 Amik 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? To bring the property in compliance with the General Plan and to allow for the construction of Multiple Dwellings (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Pz - t3 - Case Number .�_t�- _ Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed 4 Application Received by: Receipt No. C c 1� Fee Amount ."1`t(-, r) r 1 t ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 2 O. 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in_ this rezoning application have appointed Robert W Lake as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of this application form.) (1) Esther R. Brennan /, 72, • (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) 1825 N. Stapley Dr J2078 �; -7 K ("ailing Addre (Phone Number) Mesa, AZ 85Z 03 (City, State, Zip Code) (2) (rant Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone'Numoer) (City. State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone ftu.noer) Amok (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Cwner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Nuioer) (City, State. Zip Coce) STATE OF A r1 z o n a ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged bpfor!.. SS. me the ��/' ay f ' ' , 19,`-e COUNTY OF 1%i(//4''L ) by; t SZfTCsp`— My Commission Expires N�AR�UULlO 10. I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be nailed to me at their request Robert W. Lake 066 WPr ,Apache ST 4mei1 , Ste 101(Signaturt—of,negrbesenta Live) (railing address) (Phone nunoer) Apache Jct , AZ 85220-3793 (City, State. Zip Coca) STATE CF Arizona ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ) SS. me this y f 15 C; rY CF. P1 nal ) by. Robert In(' t.dke — My Commission Expires NOT..nT PUBLIC Dane 2 of 2 A.. ''` . 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item I'#10 of t is application form.) (1) ti L �r t c. ET �(Pint Owner's Name) Signature))); --4'CZ e(gF S 7,Aro ,gc f ` 3/0 j X (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (nP�4EfiC 2 ,ve-r,o (City, State, Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) i Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF A'•.'+ '/ N,/- ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ) SS. me this -7t` day of y)��,., , 19 {` COUNTY OF 1''' ,') ) by l,i-. <- )w ( r'r /t My Commission Expires. ,1 h/ <'-! ."9 �; (_�t w °i r/., I NOTARY PUBLIC / 10. I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at their request (Print representative's name) (Signature of representative) (Mailing address) (Phone number) (City, State. Zip Code) STATE OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before SS me this day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by. My Commission Expires NOTARY PUBLIC Page 2 of 2 • - ^ , PROTEST PETITION 4. Zr..;:,,,..? a A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- / -f/2 where a zone change is proposed r d " " ` from (Lk to (' k' — ' -' . -, O L d t ,/ :� /��i.'-� .. '! ! �_ Cam' q C O .• y O CAe ^ �( %tC ...,�t" A_I(0,� _ ,,,�i '„ t. „ , ,�^ (location a C . W 1- ^ ONL C2 B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in ✓_ ` aY ` the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any ^t a, os _� • i side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite ✓90_ - . thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots . >.q >._V ✓ e C4 13 2u T C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printedon the reverse a0 -, =t q H V > VI✓ side of this petition. �. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband Q O O•-..-C ..- L O. and wife must sign• If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers vE ofLS must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. � o�7^ g` � E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: rr � . V MI a...- } ,1�✓� .Y - 7. q It V r E ^ .y ✓ a C a O "3 .n 2 u V1N1, /_ L' L l / /`/�(,,.���.'>'� 4 O E C.- v00 C 3 ILt1 I A/.1 J /Imo--+ N ilr ��jjJJjj '���\/"ice O. E a 0.2 . -�L�'lA- 7t -fl O.>,ON C C.L.. ✓ • �Ciy�-may (!i^r//j` ,��.�'• ��0/ �a'�/ /"�'� 1�! L u U VN U a✓ -JN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) IGNATUR BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . C'a 24/ r (;),6):2 72d,( ,�/ - ,/.- -- -_ 2. , , V � ' /0i - A,r - d CS' 3. __� - 4. - - STATE OF/9,e/.Z c) icit) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. .q/. __ day of 27 , 19 F'. , COUNTY OF F/4/e/GD/0_ by Gti.eAt / - 6��%:/1/ r NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES• My Commission Expires Oct. 31, 1988 STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: PROTEST PETITION C C a€ 7, A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- 13-86 where a zone change is proposed La L0L a from Gen. Rural to CR-5 at Royal Palm Rd_ & F_ end Ava . .... ... o • ao (location) Cd.� L O L N v O O C.- W.- = 7 "L 2 B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in ` "" ` the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any q,�, dog u d = . i side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite .0` c i a n r thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. T▪a >.-.. a o 2 yo: CC L } C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printedon the reverse o 0 'q�V side of this petition. CdV C .a y U— W 7 V I- CJ• t = v D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers Ei� E .- L F ~ must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. v r oJg ac E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: • o.n— u o .c N Cam-c.+ c 4-. • ,oT- C.C., a,., 1 . Our property & adjoining parcels were rezoned ro TH within pagr 1-2 years. .. 7.+ C L V C d L L C +- O. C L P 7 > / o• L - dam t= Rezoning to CR-5 would not fall within expected development of general area. C V C0.• J. t ��y 3. 0E" OC Current residential character one consisting of single family homes and mobile - C! L-.- • o -- E a Ov, Cr ,...,1"L a 4. CR-5 zoning would result in unappealing & dense area surrounding smaller parce o.>,,,. C c.. a 6-� o E o " < E 7 5. The condos _- could be constructed in a more conducive area of Apache Junctio Maintenance of multiple family sections can never be guaranteed due to rentals COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . ROBERT W. SNYDER, SR. /. 101 - 22 - 039B 2. LAURA J SNYDER -GC-f• R -41 ti h/)� 101 - 22 - 039B 3. 7 U - - 4. - STATE OF ARIZONA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this .-. ) SS. j 1 Z-r day of May , 19 86 5 COUNTY OF . �,, by , ROBERT W. SNYDER, SR. and LAURA J. SNYDER ( V•,,) OFFICIAL SEAL / • '—• MARGARET A.SAMUELSON 1 �$7 NM MC MUMNA c:---;-.)czer.,.-' ,c 4. -e. 41 (2 -It-,,.....-. -C-..,,_,,....A.__ I g bra Who MIS 20,1489 `r NOTARY' PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES• PROTEST PETITION u�u� € A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- /5-8 , where a zone change is proposed d� a �.c g; d from GR General Rural to CR-5/PD at South side of Junction Drive . o 0 0.+ .+ a z ntt ^ approximately 330 feet east of Royal Palm Rd. (location) ci.. 1`= ' 2 B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in ;�1. os 7, the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any 0._- side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite 2 thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. N.. a,-0 V-H =u 5 C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printed on the reverse 1'g1' 0e►- ' q d side of this petition. e� 2372 D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband '^ v o o>i o and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers 218 a.2 a must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. CC o E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: L M C— C s O!.- A ., UL to u 1 . At the time we bought our property, you need to have 1.25 acres per dwelling ,•" ' 1C .. a house. Under this arrangement, the neighborhood has a country-type atmosphere. La . > 2. Nu .0..- C M- t of us cahn are in that area like to have it that way; that i c what CC" 3, attracted us to that area in the first place. We feel that this requirement ..Ii C Cu 0 C - d should stay the same. It you change the rules, it will make a different type 4. 0 -•_�E u u fn ,�2 d" J N 4. neighhnrhnnd nut of the area_ —.n a s.o+ .,IE 5. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. n , �,1. 1 . Victor Bowman - 2. Ruby R. Bowman f�1 ,-,_ fi^;1� � r--, �,zti ), Aimi%. II! ir'- ,, 1 , ., c �Y,/, l r 3. / 1! 5 :,-c-'6ee - 4. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this SS. 12th day of May , 19 86 , COUNTY OF BENNETT ) by Victor Bowman and Ruby R. Bowman, husband and wife NOTAR PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: //— 73 STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by • NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: / - PROTEST PETITION N C EE 3 •- - C O E<�a� A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- /, -7 where a zone change is proposed " ` from C ,L to (7 1'_ -- at /;, f. I. -.J O L , . (location) v y• CJ S.- .�' , O L kJ CA C"_2 - B. We certifythat we are the real��a�= property owners of the lots included in ` °""CD -17 the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any .0 6! O CI tf '0._� rp side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. .. . .c U- yo „^ C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printed on the reverse " a 7� side of this petition. C c Cl O C qCu U.- N 7 V L � D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband a and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers VS ar a i must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. v Ca Jo 57; OC E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: • ov,•. a 0 v.+ C a t- •• m• �/4 �� �' CI .0 C.,- rn 1 • /0 //'4' ///7 !/ T/e-%'-�/� i 4, /(>> C�ill-r t,i-// /j�/c7 /P f-/7Z 7.+ q CU V C C, L7 L C O. 2. , L O. 7 > .+ d C) C C. O C N C V C*. L "" 3. o¢o f•� . . J C C V .., O. N L•V, _ Ed 4. • o u C 0. n O.9.N C C C a Ul 70 E 0 LILwLIC aE 5. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE / BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . ir,iyi .5- k , 1--L-'44 i k/ /C----): ---, --\ :"-' cz, r- 2. 1, 1CI, 2-0-1 in . ( -, v % - - 3. / - - 4 ✓ - - STATE OF �,�,>; 0 ,,.<<, ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this z, ) SS. �,, ��_ day of Y)2,a7 , 19,f- r , COUNTY OF ��/ c ) by �27/-L? - !t,"/ -, ,/� '7,,- - / ,144� NOTARY PUBLIC • MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. • STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. _ rryACHE \✓��,, ,, �i A,...ot.4 O t 1,,-- x. '9R/ZONP ity o C pache (2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 27, 1986 /'1 MEMORANDUM TO,/ THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: (1,CHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER THROUGH. bit CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING / FROM• v.., RODNEY CLASS-ERICKSON, PLANNING ASSISTANT SUBJECT- AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 3, 1986 PZ-13-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 504) PROTEST PETITIONS Staff has received four more protest petitions filed against this rezoning case. The protest petition filed on parcel number 101-22-037 was only signed by one of the two property owners. The valid protest petitions received are sufficient to require a 3/4 vote by the City Council for passage. RC-E:CRN:MJM-Jo 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 PZ-13-86 REZONE FROM GENERAL RURAL GR TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CR-5/PD Protest Perimeter 7 CR- 4 /MH MH MH !condos { f SFH E Junction Drive { SF { l SF � , I SF { I SFH o I • J SF /////://,; f I I vac MH MH MH M Only one of the t� c / property owners TH1111 for this parcel signed the protest petition. jjProtest Filed ftz/: SUBJECT SITE -- ; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS C:ti;.,., L - - L 0 300 600 PROTEST PETITION C C € g d L U C Y d A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- / ?? / where a zone change is proposed 5� N _ Y C .� O L from ((k to CSC - at c(� .r ,,,... . ,i., , J NC o CO , (location) ao 0 �� O.C.- eJ 1— ^ 7teadr 2 — B. We certify that we are the real property`�owners of the lots included in ..= ""d O8 7" the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any jet O. v=� side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite Gs.C..CC >^ O. r thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. T e >,--v .. �ocv X , y0 �^ � C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printe on the reverse = side of this petition. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband Q O 0— T 2 _ L a and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers tg of must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. f~ E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: jui• o ,r 4/ 0 sue// h 1---17 C. >- o1 • i..A.L..,J Q�l-e.J .,�.J ji.-1x,....i xi-, ,Ct� !/�. -C-'LJ-, S i u T eJ , ,0 L O• 7 > . .4V / t/ 4'/ .., L eJ C Cl 0 C N 2. L7 -C,Le,. L.� "}-� �--.- v¢O▪ . E.+.- O C 3• -L./t-6i6 /.n....,`.,. -CJ 41.—,4.4--l.-r- ,rn rs.c!„,-c/ ,/ .e, ,:L ,..,./- ,/ ,1.•-✓ 7C. 4-1 o = d v ` 1 t.4 6-,... -. / o v v.c o. 4. 6 N C.+ -. CE N 7 O J N / / r u u m u 3 a E 15. N)',Ct, �� 4". 11 /L m�<i /O i .4-n/ ,1'71.�� ft l�� ,u�cl.L i?H-S u��n.t a. clx Gf�-cdL - 4� � � «I .�.� 6.Y_ c ,-✓ /ti,.�-,..c... �i,.,-,.t...,/1y Lim.-�-, ✓ L COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE;? BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 • ,l-)c>n Z-, M,a.ck/z t 61 ,,e,Cc,my' /c7/ - .�?;p_- - t'?_S'Qb 2. 1�c r, apt, , h��,�K 1�y )7n -)( ,i/ 1. : y� / , / I _7, I 0 3J'o 3. / / 4 - - STATE OF (.7%5 72c, ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this Ao., ,�� ) S S. .2/ se- day of Yke,,,i , 19 e6 , COUNTY OF r�ntt. ) by ,C.^1.4,i Q )7,,•,,kp,., j i j /��1tt ) /,)/7 -,P1'4_ ,)e a--y\_) C/ClAyi a NOTARY PUBL I/C) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ^„,_ PROTEST PETITION ......, E<�v° A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ-/ ?'\ here a zone change is propos d -toi a from ' —� ,.o 0 O. .1- 7; k' t o / ,C, `,ems a t r ��-�l�c_ (�i/�/t/. i.� lL,7A,_1 -c,. o 1 o ->. /;:—..? -,, ..,-2:_/-:t/ ,.�,›.- (location') :S-(r-c B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in 51'tf,8 the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any v ,._ o side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. ,AI T--V .i L>¢a LCJ y ,i; Z ! C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printed on the reverse .�� .. > d side of this petition. u- u Jc L D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband ' a and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers iIs;ora F must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. ! o, E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons. �=� sa . 1 , II �(_ L.+ >— a.., Cl, L(.,`- .ti\ ..((C,l. ���1_ 1 L% ( ,.,, , ., (-. -11,1, , x,( L.. l{ ,.il < <zLLL�-,, (._ �i.---j\_K "-- o uc�i c'T 2). CCCt-._-1'7 k1�,:_4-.C.. c,, �--,- , at-..`� 2Z-X. • '1/4 aAc E cu o g, 8. 1,�),-,-,...c,z-, \ iL- l.".> ( \,�,-' , (Z<i 7t--Z. ,, ', '_i_ -. - , ,_, .t . , l � iL � u v E d u4 L j\ _ __uu. u .o QIE '' ` _ . 1 ':('LSD, ,�i..�Ci. COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATUREp BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. • 1 - N✓i c2(1(.,._(, _C . \� Pr �l -� Q������ URf-N�� /C i - -2_ 2 - C'L' C 2.--,^ r- ( , Uv-r . 1 A 1 f (e) ,'(,, -, i1.A , 1),( ro 1 n f - 'l 1. - O 'C'C_ G 3. _ _ 4. - - STATE OF (lJ .�7fa, ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this rm. U ) SS. 7 day of 2y?(1,, , 1986 , COUNTY OF �,m At ) by Wait aec W. Q .(OeA-, rit P (`-JZ4._ in. e, NOTARY PUBAC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: , ,42i .,7V /9/7 STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 , COUNTY OF ) by NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ,:k,.J,:, �VELCPMENT PROTEST PETITION ' `C N. H. € A E< 7 A. We hereby protest rezoning case PZ- / -J"./. where a zone change is proposed ` from Z // L.. .... .., O.7 V ,'/f"- t� !_ 5— at P L,.- C /i-/ti�"�i�/ :�(� U/ C O.O 0... Y— Y L V .-/ / (vl'� ) o.. o .. �-P/iwci -:...'- - `-7yc,/ C- -,,,2,e 1 oca t i '1 ) ,Vi .L,,s_ O.0— V F- _ 4YL O -- B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in ��_C_ G Z.2do8 7., the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any ' x� side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. >..a T_O ... G O A V °`� _` .5 C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printed on the reverse V O Y_ .a~ d side of this petition. U_ V 7 C L. D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband Y 1- C T.0 = � O. and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers EI8 or d L must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. -.v u gi8�: CG E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons opt S. ) L C - o O L`.. C r u L'T 2. !�� 'C_.�-f_�,t.vs�.y� / � ,i>�'///i,L-D i�.t- A/�- • _ '� C'.�l-Ci //'�!>/Ci,t, /I(,1-,v/ C v N.. .L.. ,� // / 'J q_ Y�� N 0 3 � .. .0.. C E•C 5J O C 'L G C V . Cr. Y u V O .— EC Y ... 4. EOE...0 c c C C. p,rOE0 CIO uuaou 6 E 5 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNQTUR BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . /c'l/rc A/. [to; / lam//' 1i / - / R - 64-5-4.- 2. E 51 c C W U I KC- t _ '6 . 'd D-s.k� C�/ / - / y' - Cl 4 h f 3 t 4. STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this SS. day of 19 COUNTY OFy121. f ' NOTARY PUBLIC----- --Tiad-4.4. L(-(- C MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Urt;�rc��st'3si"at:xp� �yay6� 1» STATE OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this ) SS. day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by , NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. PROTEST PETITION 41 V 2 M A. We hereby protest rezoning case„PZ-1 3- ? , where a zone change is proposed 6! LUCw N / L v from � z to Ck s at y rt C < / ,;:.u A_� Q/AU • L -. O L co ,,/ tC Y /:.l ��� C.• W OL a 0 fl i;.L(G.( ,eG(.rl.-� /i.�;<C�`i�L 1r ,,<_( „ (1ocatronj < `� Ci;C.:.:.u, C)V o n L D.C - C'-- ^4vt 2 B. We certify that we are the real property owners of the lots included in %2Y the proposed change or of those immediately adjacent in the rear or any U 4• O S v °Q._� side thereof extending 150 feet therefrom, or of those directly opposite 01 4 a+0^ C. 0 thereto extending 150 feet from the street frontage of the opposite lots. >,,, fir-, L av s C C. We have read Zoning Ordinance Section 13.0108 which is printed on the reverse it W- N .,9- t .t v side of this petition. .- . .....2L 2 o t D. We understand that if we own the property as joint tenants, both husband • -L a and wife must sign. If we are contract buyers, both buyers and sellers E8 al.. must sign. If we are partners, all general partners must sign. oz8-5 - o . E. We are protesting this rezoning for the following reasons: �• o - d O L N C 7 / CY U q• = C C. _ 1 , S7o G!�-c �O o iyj,¢yI /4 ,1 �/7?Q area_ ti Ct++ >+- P.+ .y' L 01 L 7 C n . �W Csl i y tin,/�J0 yCCCO .0 J ' O.0 .C.CC .1 `., N L RECEIVED D 0E�+_ CC 61 C CL . p1 uw- .. Lr - E• N J .~ .... MAY i Y 1 1986 vuco, o O J 5. - ' <i auri_Of_i2LAtLN.INa AND DEVELOPMENT COUNTY ASSESSOR'S NAME (PRINTED) SIGNATURE BOOK-MAP PAGE-PARCEL NO. 1 . E�e f o/ - a- - 02 7 2. - - 3. - 4. - STATE OF (2 c, ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this Aim. ( ) SS. 7*.0 day of Maw , 19 Z , COUNTY OF )0 ,,4 ) by -1/ -1 : e.�L11. / ' 6P _ r1 `.tail, ,O vA.yy v NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 9-.? /-p1 , instrument was acknowledge �`l( STATE OF ) This 9 � f79r SS. day of COUNTY OF ) by J.5! _ , . Dine • NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. +, wane ORDINANCE NO 504 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-13-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT �1 SECTION I IN GENERAL 1 The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter in Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-5/PD Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development. 2. The approval of the zoning district classification shall be construed as only concept approval for the base zoning and shall serve as official approval of the base zoning amendment to the Zoning Map 3. Development of said property shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes, policies, guides, and detailed standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improve- ments. 4 Applicants dedicate the north forty feet (40') and the south twenty-five feet (25') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S Hill Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney take Rea I t yCORPORA RECEIVED CTY FFACHE J UNCT10! 3141 30 Kachina Square I To at P : 5 0 1)i$ ,' 2066 W. Apache Trail, suite 101 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220-3793 v1 7. Phone (602) 982-1656 Aso June 30, 1986 City of Apache Junction Department of Planning and Community Development 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220-0190 Re- PZ-13-86 Attention. Julie A. Reid, Assistant Planner Dear Julie. Please cancel the above referenced zoning case which was scheduled for July 1, 1986 at 7 p.m. before the City Council. Sincerely, ,d'e%4;;Y, 2‘ obert W. Lake LAKE REALTY CORPORATION RWL/mav ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES V71), ok)e Di/ ITEM # MEETING OF q/10 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: ,0-4) r)1)( YES NO . ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON 1 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR I COUNCILMAN BALJO V VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ✓ MAYOR HILL UNANI"^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 4 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 504, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 504 BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 504, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 504, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: AN\ Oak (>33ACHF✓G'L AlPizoNP `Oity a f C471ache unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT June 12, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO;_ THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ;, ICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER THROUGH: /' b-CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: '—I JULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - JULY 1, 1986 PZ-21-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 511) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: JAFCO & Associates, an Arizona partnership REPRESENTATIVE: Lowell Arnold LOCATION: west side of Cortez Road, just south of Lost Dutchman Boulevard. CURRENT ZONING: Single Family Residence Zone CR-1 PROPOSED ZONING: General Commercial District C-3 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Local Commercial Opportunity NO. OF PARCELS: one GROSS ACREAGE: approximately 1.3 acres .-. CURRENT LAND USE. Single Family Residence SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - Elk's Lodge South - vacant East - vacant West - convenience store SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Business Zone (Penal County) CB-2 South - General Business Zone CB-2 East - Single Family Residence Zone CR-1 West - General Business Zone CB-2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: flat with back and one side dropping off into a wash. Agenda Approved by 'L Date Item # Consent Agenda r Public Hearing Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ,.* PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 511 , PZ-21-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE, AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE Mayor and City Counc;' "'� Agenda Item - July 1, 1986 PZ-21-86 (Ordinance No. 511) June 12, 1986 - Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The request does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. The local commercial General Plan designation does extend over this site. General Commercial District (C-3) normally would not be appropriate for this site due to the adjoining low density residential property to the east. How- rn ever, previous rezonings approved in this area have in effect set a precedent for the heavier commercial uses. The developer has previously indicated a desire to develop this property in conjunction with the properties to the west and south. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the East seven feet (7' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of June 10, 1986, after public hearing, adopted the following motion: (M/S Conway/Taylor 3-1-0) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-21-86, an application of JAFCO and Associates, an Arizona partnership for its property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Family Residence Zone to C-3 General Commercial District. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. This request does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. 2. The local Commercial General Plan designation does extend over this site. 3. And, we would be setting a precedent." STIPULATION IN ORDINANCE Stipulating the dedication of the East seven feet (7' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. CRN:JAR:jl PZ-21-86 REZONE FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE CR-1 TO COMMERCIAL DISTRICT C-3 eS 1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --7 .- -I 1 / / I Pinal County / / I CB-2 I / 1 C-1245 r / / C-1043 I / / CB-2 (b / Pinal County I vacant / v. / I / ./ 0' /� B P.OE / / asI / /L - --- i- --/ L _ - � - Lost Dutchman Blvd t- R/W 669/816 I CB-2/ / convenieno/ ICI I ' I I �, / store '/ { I I I I CB-2 // / / i t I CR-i I I CR-1 G - - - - -1' II (vacant( I I Il Yii i I I 1 , 1 vacant { I I ; { I �. , I'lII I I I� L _ _J3L, L I L _ T _ _1 Windsong St. ,/ SUBJECT SITE iin 1 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) 1 I I I 1 I0 300 600 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From To C--3 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for' Local Commercial Opportunity Area 3. Size of your property: apx. 1 .3 [< ] acres ( ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? House 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North Elks Lodge South Vacant East Vacant West Mary' s Country Store 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: That portion of the attached legal description lying east of the 200' strip running parallel to Highway 88 previously zoned CB-_2 by Pinal County. Section 15 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? 100--25-001-04 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? To complete the commercial zoning on that portion of the property not previoiasly zoned by Pinal County. (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number /"Z-Zi C, Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed Application Received by: ,/rQ -/ 7 C Receipt No. C'7_6/ Fee Amount Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 9. I/We do hereby ceL_Lfy that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings befL :e the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of t is applica on fo m. JAFCO AND ASSOCIATES, an (1) Arizona General Partnership (Print Owner's Name) ( gna re P. 0. Box 447 982-2831 . (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) Apache Jct. AZ 85217-0447 (City, State, Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) , (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) gc\� ti`1����� (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) f .' di *i (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) i. f 0 �''` „ (City, State, Zip Code) f % STATE OF A (tzonc. ) The foregoing instrument s acknowledged beforeor ff ' ) SS me this 1 `f day of 4 .r, / , 19 3 COMITY OF }gym„Q ( ) by Low.)e it A t nol.. ). . My Commission Expires. (Q�L-(a—$q ]' 3 gam; oT r :L C N •. `� 10 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this f $ rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at their request. (Print representative's name) (Signature of representative) (Mailing address) (Phone number) (City, State, Zip Coe) STATE OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before SS. me this day of , 19 COUNTY OF ) by• My Commission Expires NOTARY PUBLIC Page 2 of 2 4IP•MIP Ask ossik, ORDINANCE NO. 511 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-21-86 FROM CR-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY Amik BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as that part of the North half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, of Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona, lying south and east of Arizona State Highway No. 88, EXCEPT that portion of the above described parcel that lies within 200 feet of the Southeastern right-of-way line of State Highway Route 88 in Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from CR-1 Single Family Residence Zone to C-3 General Commercial District subject to the following stipulation the applicant dedicate the East seven feet (7') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of Amok the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ... ... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES \ / 1 ,..... 0 ' )))„,1-1 ITEM # WpDri MEETING li/S4 6-`" 6-- NOTION BY: SECONDED BY: - Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER lie COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ / COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL I I UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / ( 1) \\i, / ifrte ITEM # MEETING rIF MOTION BY: coy) SECONDED BY:_rk YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ V MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 5 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 511 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 511 BY TITLE ONLY. Stun 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 511 , AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 511 , AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: ^ PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 512, PZ-22-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3 . WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE irs.P.CHE dG .+ y '1R/zoNP Wily o 04pache 079unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT June 12, 1986 MEMORANDUM To . THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: . ,,,MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER THROUGH: 4,1 CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: JULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - JULY 1, 1986 PZ-22-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 512) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Ray and Lola Pershall REPRESENTATIVE: Dennis Laubenstein LOCATION: On the south side of Highway 60 approximately 600-700 feet east of Royal Palm Road. CURRENT ZONING: Single Family Residence CR-3 PROPOSED ZONING: General Commercial District C-3 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial Opportunity NO. OF PARCELS: One GROSS ACREAGE: Approximately .87 acre CURRENT LAND USE: A block structure and a double wide mobile home SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - vacant South - vacant East - single family residence West - vacant SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Business Zone CB-2 South - Single Family Residence Zone CR-3 East - Heavy Commercial District C-4 West - Single Family Residence Zone CR-3 and ,�A Local Business Zone CB-1 Agenda Approved by •t ..r. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Flat topography - nothing remarkable Date item n Consent Agenda -� Public Hearing 7 6 Old Business New Business Postponed Rem - 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Mayor and City Coun•il .m. Agenda Item - July , 1986 PZ-22-86 - (Ordinance No. 512) June 12, 1986 - Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS There is a non conforming use of the property for repair of travel trailers. Approval of the request would bring this use into conformance with the current zoning ordinance. No right-of-way dedication will be required. .•, There are existing buildings which will be leased. No building permits will need to be acquired to commence using the property. Staff would recommend the stipulation of the six foot (6' ) masonry wall or screening fence as required by Section 16.0505 and Section 16.0509 of the Zoning Ordinance. This would be required for new construction, but may not be required for existing buildings. Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of June 10, 1986, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion (M/S Jorgensen/Vanhoy 5-0-0) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-22-86, an application of Ray and Lola Pershall for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from Single Family Residence Zone CR-3 to General Commercial District C-3. Any stipulations or recommendations are. 1. The stipulation of a six foot (6' ) masonry wall or screening fence as required by Section 16.0505 and Section 16.0509 of the Zoning Ordinance. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. It will bring the property into compliance with the existing General Plan. 2. It is consistent with the other properties in this area. " STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE The stipulation of the six foot (6' ) masonry wall or screening fence as required by Section 16.0505 and Section 16.0509 of the Zoning Ordinance. CRN-JAR:j1 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From To (:-.1 j 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for' F�✓F744Xf- ' )riir 7 'i.-2 4M.oOrerrliAi r V 3. Size of your property: 110 X .O O [ ] acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? awns ,ci }j(;)I(1,4j rtrioc.b(a teict rnai,(.e �ery.e 5. What has been built on the property next tc yours? North (!,S. !'ht (DO ` UQC<1ni )avid South WCICQy-A I4nci C'bc Scud S"l36` East West Va.Cc t + 14nd J 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: Skt,=1 Otiac Lc.c Section , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number' /Oal - 3 -. inA 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? —7", ��r,-c tt C` .: A. t, 1\ : _rhr\ +'.( ( (•P..\�'-.i I (l 1(41 � f (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed J/2 a1' Application Received by: ✓A Receipt No. D X3r Fee Amount Zsd7 Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 A.., ,.. 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. ,_ d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed t/c...., s kt,Jloe_nsic.i 1 as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of this application form.) (1) t�� �er,h�lI ,� i1/7 �(PcJnt Owner's Name) rt � (Signature Y { 5 7 E RAJ f .n,c -e. YicC SYSi Mailing Address) (Phone Number) , /11ca 7 F.c. ', (City.'State, Zip Code (2) AC',n f er‘,halm ,X.,, U.t ,,:✓�-Ge (Print Owner's Name) Signature J 77 (2 ca(-E„-nc r z 9CS - Sssl (Mailing Address Phone Number) (GS4[ 112 . 5.cR��c (City, State, Zip ode (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) "l `. . (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) .,0- `'' S ie,er tj 't 1,71 ar, " }tailing Address) (Phone Number) '� ( -ity, State, Zip Code) ,. A 511 rf.j~FARTZONA ) The foregoin instrument was acknowledged before vJ MARICOPA ) S me this _9Ti day/of AY 19 86 ' �.� ' JCOUJtic OF ) by ) `'� My Commission Expires Mar. J,�;4 i:' ' ;My Commission Expires: NOTA PUBLIC 10. I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property U•" er(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at`-their request. �1 jJc.-,,- ,s 1 o,hy:���<=, �_z,,,,p .--ia.uQx.hu7r4,-) (Print representative s name) (Signature of representative) J .& c�1t' ., SGS2 E t)n,v .-a .1f, c3:� _3(: 7 ., ` '"• 4/ j,` y(�Mailing aa�ddress) J (Phone nunber) R .' L, , (City,`State, 2 p Cod ,,� / - ATE OF r ) The foreg iigi instrument M4i Ackno Qged before --V. .`O � ;;-_ - ZZO..,� ) SS me this lfffiii da /of Al / 19 86, :.;"/� �, ia:, coL�rr oFMARICOPA ) by DE BE _ - / .. My Commission Expires ' �� :a4.," " My Cominiss(on Expires Mar 9, 19 /r NOTARY PUBLIC Pa e /2 of 2 PZ-22-86 REZONE FROM CR-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE TO C-4 HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT � - - - - - - -� \\CR-5I N. vacant N N N. \ N h- CB-2 \ -N lik 6p N { N N { N. N CB-2 -NJ mobile home //c� � N TT Sales // block building _ _ = � o ���- trailer T - --N 7, �� 4 galv anized anized fence / N/ 1 IN all the way ' 1 ) 1 Iaround � I N I N CB-1 N � I tI( \ \ vacant � I vacant I 1 4 1 CR-3 I C-4 1 I I I S F H 1 044 I I 1 1 Palm Springs 1 Subdivision I I 1 iI 1 L_ DESERT AVENUE — _ — — —— J L J i . / SUBJECT SITE t ; LIMITS Or ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RUR .L) L-_1 f 1 1 I 1 1 0 185 370 ORDINANCE NO 512 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-86 FROM CR-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVI- SIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, Ass\ ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as That part of Tract A, PALM SPRINGS, according to the records of Pinal County, Arizona, as recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 27, more particularly described as follows BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Tract "A", thence North 54 degrees 52 minutes 38 seconds West along the southerly right-of-way of the State Highways 60, 70, 80, and 89 a distance of 190 feet; thence South 0 degrees 30 seconds West, 200 feet; thence South 54 degrees 52 minutes 18 seconds East 190 feet to a point on the West line of an alley, thence North 0 degrees 30 seconds East along said alley line 200 feet to the point of beginning in Section 28, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from CR-3 Single Family Residence to C-3 General Commercial District subject to the following stipulation a six foot (6') masonry wall or screening fence as required by Section 16.0505 and Section 16 0509 of the Zoning Ordinance SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this oak ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES c)), tg I ITEM # MEETING 0 1 0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y,ES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ / COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR �� COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON V/:/ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER / - MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES () * 1 ► 1 \ t ITEM # MEETING OF 181 GeP, obvp./ MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ .•. COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR J COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL v COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL I UNANPOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 6 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 512, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 512, BY TITLE ONLY. SI 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 512, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 512, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: p PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR CDBG APPLICATION 2 . WILL THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE PQACHF✓G U y�, �� 1�J►• z JV{_•1 1 � AlPtzoNP amity 04pac/ie unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Agenda Approved by June 24, 1986 Date Item s�- Consent Agenda Public Hearing MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Old Business New Business THROUGH: 5 ,MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Postponed Item FROM: vyl,-'CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING PREPARED BY: JJULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - JULY 1, 1986 PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEEDS 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) APPLICATION A public hearing to obtain citizen views on community development and housing needs is a requirement of the CDBG application process. Information obtained may be used to determine the project selected for application of CDBG funding for 1986. Information regarding the 1986 CDBG program will be available for discussion. CDBG applications must "qualify" by meeting one of the following criteria: 1. Benefits Low/Moderate Income Persons. The project must be designed to serve an area where not less than 60% of the residents are of low to moderate income. These areas are determined by the Bureau of Census and are called "Block Groups. " There are seven (7) Block Groups in Apache Junction with one that meets the 60% low to moderate criteria. An alternative to the Block Group-Census method allows the City staff to conduct special studies which have been previously approved by the Arizona Department of Commerce. 2. Aids in the prevention and elimination of slums or blights. 3. Alleviates an urgent need - health hazard. Approximately $100,000 would be available to the City of Apache Junction if the application passes the selection process successfully. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Honorable Mayor an^ ity Council Agenda Item - July 1, 1986 June 24, 1986 Page Two Additional requirements will need to be accomplished within the next 6-8 weeks. The following is a time line of these events/requirements. June 24, 1986 - Community Development and Housing Needs. Public Hearing Notice published. July 1, 1986 - Community Development and Housing Needs Public Hearing. .•. July 6, 1986 - Publish Public Notice of Availability of CDBG application, post performance displacement plans for review and date of adoption of resolutions. July 7, 1986 - Public review/comment period begins. July 20, 1986 - Public review/comments period ends. Week of July 21 through July 24, 1986 - Adoption of resolutions. (will require a special meeting one night of this week) . August 1, 1986 - Submittal of Grant application by communities to COG's. September 30, 1986 - Submittal of Grant application by COG's to State. November 17, 1986 - Communities notified of Grant awards. Possible Projects Staff has reviewed the eligible activities and as a preliminary starting point for public input offers the following projects as possibilities. A. Housing Rehabilitation There are strong indications this is a community need. The follow statistics are taken from the 1980 census for year round residences: �• 110 No bathroom or only half bath 67 No complete kitchen facilities 21 No heating These statistics may indicate a lack of septic tanks, also, which was supported by the Pinal County Health Department in 1984-1985. There are several levels of rehabilitation ranging from basic safety and health (code requirements) to average living conditions. Examples of additional repairs that could be affected would include: 1. Removal of architectural barriers for elderly/handicapped 2. Installation of hot water heaters 3. Repair to leaky roofs. 4. Installation of insulation 5. Repair to plumbing facilities 6. Repair to electrical facilities Honorable Mayor and^ty Council Agenda Item - July 1, 1986 June 24, 1986 Page Three There are also indications that approximately 100 homes are not connected to a water system and must haul water for household usage. Participants must qualify for program by low income levels. B. Neighborhood Recreational Parks Generally, this would be playground and picnic facilities in low/moderate income areas. This would qualify by low/moderate income by Block Group. C. Center For Handicapped Single or multi-purpose facility to assist persons with physical , mental , developmental and/or emotional impairments by providing education, physical/ vocational rehabilitation, etc. D. Economic Development All activities must be directed toward the alleviation of physical and economic distress through stimulation of private investement, community revitalization and expansion of economic opportunities for low or moderate income persons and handicapped persons. a) Acquisitions, construction, or installation of commercial or industrial buildings, equipment including railroad spurs, etc. b) Assistance to private, for profit businesses c) Revolving loan fund CRN:JAR-J1 ' 4 !I t1 il i f'i d li d 11-1 I I 1 d d d ' LOS, PUT(..... ro 1111.1111111-111MIIIIHME MB IMF= 11111,-011 MI L',- Lye__ , I......v ji...., I.-- • . IAL- I .-- •L.D.1. :7'I v A 11 •••••••• V _, ,...,.._ B G 8 , 1 . . B G 6 • i i -2.9-- c . I / i r PS.*1, [ 1 8 ____1 4111 III i ? '.. ' • ... .. -le- AID-. I I • Arm. v --.--- ..2-...- • .1.-1-•••••-•L A „B.' _•••__ ••••••DY• V- S 1 I 1 ••••1 114...1t..1.11.4i 1••I• g.,1—4•__1•ILD•A 1,.iIN::,..t ••r•'• 1111 1.1111101I1 BLVD ..4 1 . -A-4,•.1••.••1111.0•D,• • Do --AB1.A2B4- - _.- ..__ r I 1' G1 i _ ) •....., „..._ i 7 I.—— LII ... — ' . .. • PM .. . I 1 6 1 ! F. I- i -1•-- / 1: Q MIMI 2 0 2 It A,l . 1 I . 1 a • 2 2 • ,. a I — .-i,... / • n• I 8 I 1 1 ''S L 1 I..1 t • lir il, a a •••• .1 i I — 1 i ,1 i ' .: i .., II I. .... , a lir , 1 --- ____ o ...___ i , m - r , t )A . g ',E:71 11, 11,/ .rAcis, - - 0 -A_ • 'a.1 • I •..,... MIMI- i, ri i ii .,s izr .,, . „ .,...:: .„, I V. ,....S__ I I. 1 lo 1 1 • : , 1 1" .'•-"•;'. j-_,..... , 11•0•01••• • •••• - --.. -- I I _/.• O 4 ...--. 1 , .....; ' -17 . . 1 1 i B G 7 Pill , ".,. I -_-•_ , i HPIS i I ,1 g ' di . , . _1 ! • _ .. , .. , hill(Wo G ; _i___,,. .... .4,7, •rm. •1 I 1 i 1.- i I.•-• - Iiiikor 7..... 1 - , ___. _,.,...._ ____ 30 ; Wilda I 2 -'-'-9 " - 21""" —1'2- - : r t--1,7 Ij ' ......,_ 1 . A i , •....ea.,._ , , ...m i 11, ir i 7.3.11L1.1. 3 iliPir : rili .4, ,:flpeir17”. _.1., ; r . ..— x x 1 Ie• .....21 , I 1 • i, ,.-... -14-1i- 411. -1-•.-- ) B G 2 :• . -LA-- -1...c- L.,- .. l_52•AllIng ilf- ., ,, 111:•••=•-• A _.„ 1 _,....... OFFICIAL _LVL. STREET NAMING MAP :. , --- 1 APACHE JUNCTION, 32 ARIZONA , I A. , Pr i o.A• i .,.(,),......4..... , c.. tt(.../..".......—.. .r, 111 .• II I• I I ,,... ..... I ... — _ 114014141 4 1 i 1 1 I i 11 4 4 1 I 4 li li !i II li 4 4 4 .' -1 .1 4 4 4 4 4 .1 4 gi 4 4 4 4 1 4 I 1 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 • 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 • I • —._ter_----.--.—_. _.. u_..� _ —.—�..-- a . •„ —.....�..+i.rw_•.. --_— ,� , -PERCENT-OF L W-AND--MODERATE PERSONS Br' BLOCK-GROUP FOR P!NAt Cb�AZ--" --` "" - ---' -- 1 �'1 / - --DATE' 060484 ' ' LO AND MOD INCOME LEVEL USED: FAMILY 130 UNREL ATED NDIVIDUAL 9120 - APER NTAGE TOTAL LOW-MOD LOW-MOD TOTAL AVERAGE CENSUS—BLOCK--OF•-PERSONS—rOW-VIOD-JNRELATED PERSONS 1OTAi— UNRtL 1O7A1—'L"OH=MOD- -PERSONS- - PLA - UAZ MCD TRACT GROUP LOW-MOD • PERSONS PERSONS IN FAN PERSONS PERSONS FAMILIES FAMILIES FAMILY ---- -35- - - - -- 5- --U013------ 1 --32.53---- --1209-- --125- -----1084 - -- 3716 -----293"--- 954 - ---- 302 3.59 0 35 5 0014 1 14.80 350 55 295 2365 96 653 85 3.48 ----- 5--— -5--0014 —2 ----SO:26 749-----1 28 - - 621-- --24 75-- --209- 752---- 206 3.01 . 0 - 35 5 0014 3 54.51 1232 213 1019 2260 269 473 242 4.21 6ioKe S 5 001-k 4---54:fi2 304 -69 435 921 77 241 124 3.51 39 s nnis sA_6A 7779 22n isso xisn 310 760 417 3.74 -5 - 26 OUQi-- —1-- 60.83 -- ---598 -----1 60-- 438-----983-- --198-----307- --- 171 -_ 2.56 -- 7 5 26 0003 2 51-.54 : 1426 198 1228 2767 249 950 463 2.65 -7-- 5— 26— -0003----3-30.44— --281 ---5-5 -226- -923 — 70---- 287- ---- 76 - -2:98- (-if"' 7 5 26 0003 5 43.28 506 62 444 1169 95 395 163 2.72 oft 'Al 5 26--00&3- - 6 4-8-68---442 21 421 -908 52 334 164 2.57 7 5 26 0003 7 56.38 1251 246 1005 2219 357 727 392 2.56 i t'-` -5 26--0003— 8- -47:52 --4 0— $$ -94fi--- -126 -316 -- - 143 - ----2.60 -- ---- - 9999 0 26 uuu) 4 39.02 208 19 — � 533 49 169 66 2.87 ( • 9999—O---26---0003---- -9- 52 -26 _ --277 -- 13 -- -264-- 530 -----20----205- - -- 106 " 2.49-. -- —SeUREf:-1-94O--EfN-S-US-St1MMARY TAPE 3. FOR--1Ate-Of-ARIZONA '- ) • v y ? 1 ♦ I e . aF �t.r• f t r ', i : ,111, at. t,.7+tit.,� 9v� }•W+ I l ' . n • . ' • - • , ,' LI f�•f�`r u- 1.,i• 11 �'4tii)0,101. i•3,,e,,,,,,g: -! 1'•1 1 j J .' 7.'' 1-, 1 t �+T.' 777 ) } ,. , p. ... PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 450 and 457, LOT SPLITS 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3 . WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6. IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE PQACHE✓G z .ti gR�ZpNP cOity a� 04pache ounctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /k, June 26, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO- HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. ilielIMICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: 6g.sCHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 457 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 457, including the amendments thereto, as adopted by the City Council on June 17. However, the amendment to Section 3.07.04(5) changed the scope of the process to such a degree that many other sections of the Ordinance will need to be changed. Following is a listing of proposed amendments which would alter the process to what I preceived as the intent of the amendment to 3.07.04(5) . Section 3.05.02: Amend to read: " It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or other legal entity to create for sale or lease any parcel that is subject to the requirements of this Ordinance until an approved land aplit map complying with the provisions of this Ordinance has been approved. " 3.07.03(2) Is a $75.00 fee appropriate, since recording and transportation costs would be eliminated? 3.07.03(3) Amend to read: "Five (5) copies of the land split map. " 3.07.03(4) Amend to read: "Proof of ownership". Since the map would not be recorded, a title report is not as critical . Section 3.07.03• add subsection (5) to read: " A certified survey map of the property, if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning due to: inability to accurately determine property boundaries in the field; existing structures; odd-shaped parcels; ambiguous legal descriptions; or any other condition which would render a determination on the proper division of the property difficult in the absence of a survey map. " 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Section 3.07.03: add subsection (6) to read: "Proposed deeds of conveyance" Since a survey is not going to be generally required, the legal descriptions will not be based on or referenced to a recorded survey map. Therefore, it is essential that the instruments used for conveyance contain a legal description conforming to the mapped parcel lines. Please note that these proposed deeds would not need to contain to whom it is being conveyed, nor the terms or conditions of sale or lease. Section 3.07.04: Amend to read. Section 3 07 04 Land Split Map Requirements The land split map shall be submitted on vellum, transparent reproducible film, blueline or blackline prints, or other suitable medium as approved by the Director of Planning, at a scale large enough to show all details clearly (normally 1" = 100' or larger) on a sheet 8i" x 14" or 18" x 24" A line shall be drawn around the sheet leaving a margin of one inch (1") The land split map shall show or contain the following information 1 A title to read "Apache Junction Land Split Map (case number)." 2. Graphic and written scale, north indicator, date of preparation, and preparer's name and address 3 Legal description of the property 4 Boundaries of the property showing distances (in feet and decimals thereof) 5 By note or a legend, identify any symbols used on the map 6 Dimensions of all parcel lines with each parcel identified by letter and indicating the net area in square feet of each parcel, and a legal description of all parcels 7 Name, course, length and width of existing and proposed street dedications 8. Course, length, and width of existing and proposed private access, utility, public service, and drainage easements 9 The identification of adjacent subdivisions by record data and land split maps /1111\ 10 Delineation on the map of any areas identified on the flood insurance rate map as special flood areas 11 The location of existing structures 12 Certificate of approval This is to certify that this map complies with the requirements of the City of Apache Junction, that on behalf of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this land split map is hereby approved on this day of , 19 By Planning Director Section 3.07.05 eliminate and the numbering of sections to conform. Section 3.07.08 Amend to read: "The Planning Director shall render a decision on the proposed land split of approval , denial or conditional approval . " This may help speed up the process by having a provision for conditional approval , also the preparation of materials by the average citizen without a survey may result in maps which are inaccurate. A conditional approval process would relieve the City of the responsibility of approving a lot split which may result in an illegal situation and put the burden on the applicant for compliance. 3.07.11 (8) Eliminate. "for recordation". 3.07.12 Amend to read: "One (1 ) approved map each shall be distributed to: the Director of Planning, the applicant, the Building Official/Zoning Administrator, and to the City Engineer." CRN:MJM:jo AS AMENDED AND ADOPTED JUNE 17, 1986 ORDINANCE NO 457 AN ORDINANCE OF TIE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE C'TY OF APACHE .'U+CT'O;I, ARIZONA AMENDING ARTICLE III OF THE APACHE JUIC-•Oil Sh,BOVh SrO„ PEG.jL.T ONS BY SETTING FORTH STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, AND REOU'RE=1E,TS FOR LAND ":,2L'TS REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING OR SEVEPABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE C. Y OF JU ICTIOI, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL Article III (Administrative Subdivisions - Land Splits) of Chapter 2 (Subdivision Regulations) of Volume II (Land Development Code) of t^e Apache ,unction City Code be amended as follows ARTICLE III SECTION 3 00 ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISIONS - LAND SDLITS SECTION 3 01 SHORT TITLE SECTION 3 02 DEFINITIONS SECTION 3 03 AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL REGULATIOI SECTION 3 04 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCU,IE"TS SECTION 3 05 APPLICABILITY SECTION 3 06 ENFORCEMENT SECTION 3 07 LAND SPLIT APPLICATION AND APPROVAL PROCE7:U'PCS SECTION 3 01 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance may be referred to and cited as the "Apache ,;unction Arizona Land Split Ordinance " SECTION 3 02 DEFINITIONS Section 3 02 01 LAND SPLIT the division of improved or unimproved land whose area is two and one-half (23) acres or less into two (2) or three (3) tracts or parcels of land for the purpose of sale or lease Section 3 02 02 SUBDIVISION see Section 7 03 19 SECTION 3 03 AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL REGULATIONS The regulations contained in this Ordinance are authorized pursuant to A R S Section 9-462.01 through Section 9 463 04 SECTION 3 04 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTSSection 3 04 01 A land split map shall conform to all applicable policies o` the Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan Section 3 04 02 A land split map shall conform to all applicable regulaticrs or the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Ordinance pis Section 3 04 03 A land split map shall conform to the Street Llassi;ication Plan d adopted by Ordinance No 33 and any amendments thereto SECTION 3 05 APPLICABILIT( `! Section 3 05 0l The regulations contained in this Ordinance shall apply to ail divisions of � land created for sale or lease within the corporate limits of Apache .,unction Arizona, defined by this Ordinance to be a land :.plit Section 3 05 02 It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership or other legal entity to create for sale or lease any parcel that is subject to the reauiraments of this Ordinance until an approved land split map compl,ino with the provisions of this Ordinance has been recorded with the recorder s office of the count) wherein the platted area lies. Section 3 05 03 The division of any property into two (2) or more parcels, if a new street is involved, shall proceed through the subdivision process Section 3 05 04 The division of any property, the boundaries of which have Peen fixed by a recorded subdivision plat, into more than two (2) parcels snail proceed through the subdivision process. Section 3 05 05 The creation of four (4) or more units having the right or exclusive occupancy coupled with an undivided interest in the land, such as in a condominium, horizontal property regime, cooperative, community apartment to..nhouse, or similar project, shall proceed through the subdivision process Section 3 05 06 The creation of two (2) or three (3) units having the right of exclusive oc- cupancy coupled with an undivided interest in the land, such as in a condo- /\ minium, horizontal property regime, or similar project, shall proceed throug the land split map process. Section 3 05 07 Boundary adjustment plats and deeds, where the land taken frcm one (1) parcel is added to an adjacent parcel, need not be filed with the City or Apache Junction, provided that the proposed adjustment does not 1 Create any new lots 2. Render any existing lots substandard in size or shape 3 Render substandard the setbacks of existing development 4. Impair any existing access, easements, or public improvements SECTION 3 06 ENFORCEMENT Sections 6 12, 6 13 and 6 14 shall apply SECTTON 3 07 LAID SPLIT APPL1CAT1ON AND .,PPRO::A1 PROCEDU° S ORDINAiNCE NO 457 PAGE 2 OF 6 Section 3 07.01 The division of land defined by this ordinance to be a land split 'equires the approval of a land split map by the Planning Director or the City Council Section 3 07 02 The purpose of the Land Split Map review is to determine the appropriateness of the access and lot design with respect to the contours of the lane, to { determine if the setbacks of existing development are being renaered nonconform- created,with the creation of new lot lines, to determine if a subdivision is being created, and to determine whether or not the proposed land split conforms with City policies and ordinances Section 3 07 03 Application Requirements Applicants requesting land split map approval shall submit the following to the Department of Planning 1 A completed application form 2 A nonrefundable 5 7 5.00iling fee to offset the costs of investigating and prpc)ssing the application Three ll 1 3 Fkikx(R) blueline or blackline prints folded into a 9" X 12" size and three (3) mylars (which may be submitted later„) the ntdOsolit but4. A title report dated not less than 30 p pal T a7- days prior to submittal of the application. Section 3 07 04 Land Split Map Requirements The land split map shall be submitted on a transparent reproducible polyester film drawn with India Ink at a scale large enough to show all details clearly (normally 1" = 100' or larger) on a sheet 18" X 24", or)E Ob0 ' Alineft 1 shall be drawn around the sheet leaving a margin of one inch (1' ) , nldrg The2". land split map shall show or contain the following information 1 A title to read "Apache Junction Land Split Map (case number) 2 Graphic and written scale, north indicator, and date of preparation 3. Legal description of the property existing 4 Location and description of xx*(qy and proposed monuments to which -1 all bearings, dimensions, angles, and similar data shall be referenced Such data shall be tied to the City datum system 5. TYie prescribed property description as L 95 e required by the State of Arizona and by Pinal County be used to determine where the lot is, how it is configured, and what is its re- 6 By note or a legend, identify any symbols used on the map lationship to the surramding land. 7 Bearings and dimensions of all parcel lines with each parcel identified by letter and indicating the net area in square feet of each parcel. B Name, course, length and width of existing and proposed street dedica- tions 9 Course, length, and width of existing and proposed private access, utility, public service, and drainage easements 10 The identification of adjacent subdivisions and land split maps by record data 11 Delineation on the map of any areas identified on the flood insurance rate map as special flood areas ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 3 OF 6 12 The location of existing structures 13 Owner's certificate MiXXXX&I State of Arizona S S County of Know all men by these presents that as owner(s) and as Trustee nave 1v1 (under the name of ) a portion of the or Section , Township Range , Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian Apache Junction, County, Arizona, as shown mapped hereon and hereby puolish this land split map and hereby declare that this map sets forth the location and gives the dimensions of the parcels or units and streets and easements constituting same and that each parcel and street shall he known by the letter and name given to each and that a subdivision as defines by state law res e ivel n this ma eels and local laws is not being created. f Easements are hereby dedicated for the purposes shown hereon In witness whereof as owners, have caused its name to be signed on this map, tnis day of , 19 By In witness whereof as Trustee, has hereunto caused its corporate name to be signed by the undersigned officer thereunto duly authorized this day of , 19 • , as Trustee By Its 14 Acknowledgement State of Arizona S S County of On this the day of , 19 , before riliN me the undersigned officer appeared who acknowledged themselves to be as owners, and also appeared before me who acknowledged himself to be a Trust l,rficer of , as Trustee, and that they, being duly authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand and official seal Notary Public My Commission Expires ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 4 OF 6 15 Engineer's or surveyor's certificate This is to certify that the survey and the map or the division of land described herein was accurately done under my direction and that all lots are staked or will be staked and all monuments are set or will be set within one (1) year after recordation e ( Signature Date Registration No seal 16 Certificate of Approval This is to certify that this map complies with the requirements of the City of Apache Junction, eXXXXXXAMWoc and that this land split map is hereby approved on this day of , 19 By Planning Director 17 Reserve space for the recorder's certificate in the upper right hand corner of the map Section 3 07 05 The Planning Director may approve alternative wording in the certificates Section 3 07 06 The Planning Department shall review the application and make a determination as to its completeness The Planning Department shall advise the applicant aetermined to be incomplete of deficiencies if the application is ll Section 3 07 07 Upon determining that an application is complete the Planning Department may distribute materials to the following agencies for their recommendations 1. Other City Departments 2 Fire Chief 3 Any other relevant agency Section 3 07 08 The Planning Director shall render a decision on the proposed land split Section 3 07 09 Notices of the decision shall be sent to the applicant advising him that he may appeal the decision of the Director to the City Council Section 3 07 10 An appeal of the Director's decision must be filed with the City Clerk s Of'ice within thirty (30) days of the date of decision The City Council shall consider the appeal no earlier than fourteen (14) days nor later than forty-rive (45) days from the date of the filing of the appeal Section 3 07 11 The Planning Director and the City Council, in evaluating and making aecisions on land split proposals, shall consider the following criteria ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 5 OF 6 etS 1 The land split proposal's consistency with the City's General Plan 2 The proposal's conformity to the City's Zoning Ordinance 3 The proposal's conformity to Article iII and IV (Subdivision Design Principles and Standards) and other applicable sections of the L'ty s Subdivision Regulations 4 The proposal's conformity with the City's Street Classirication Plan 1 5 The proposal's lot size and design with respect to the site s topo, y 6. The identification of any setback problems with respect to any existing development on the property and the new parcel boundaries to be created 7. A determination from the title information and lot/street design that a subdivision is not being created 8. That the signatures on the land split map have been affixed with Tndia ink for recordation 9 Other pertinent criteria Section 3 07 12 One (1) approved mylar each shall be distributed to the County Recorder the Director of Planning and the applicant, and one print eacn to the Building Official/Zoning Administrator, and to the Citj Engineer SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILJTY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not arfect the validity of the remaining portions thereof (:_ PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF APACHE JU'iC0041, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S HiTI Mayor ATTEST athleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ' av'd r AleL]i City Attorney ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 6 OF 6 Re, kem ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING ARTICLE III OF THE APACHE JUNCTION SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS BY SETTING FORTH STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND SPLITS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL Article III (Administrative Subdivisions - Land Splits) of Chapter 2 (Subdivi- sion Regulations) of Volume II (Land Development Code) of the Apache Junction City Code be amended as follows pl ARTICLE III SECTION 3 00 ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISIONS - LAND SPLITS SECTION 3 01 SHORT TITLE SECTION 3 02 DEFINITIONS SECTION 3 03 AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL REGULATION SECTION 3 04 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS SECTION 3 05 APPLICABILITY SECTION 3.06 ENFORCEMENT SECTION 3 07 LAND SPLIT APPLICATION AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES SECTION 3 01 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance may be referred to and cited as the "Apache Junction, Arizona, Land Split Ordinance ' SECTION 3 02 DEFINITIONS Section 3 02 01 LAND SPLIT the division of improved or unimproved land whose area is two and one-half (2i) acres or less into two (2) or three (3) tracts or parcels of land for the purpose of sale or lease Section 3 02 02 SUBDIVISION see Section 7 03 19 SECTION 3 03 AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL REGULATIONS The regulations contained in this Ordinance are authorized pursuant to A R S Section 9-462 01 through Section 9 463 04 SECTION 3 04 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS Section 3 04 01 A land split map shall conform to all applicable policies of the Apache Junc- tion, Arizona, General Plan Section 3.04 02 A land split map shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Apache Junction, Arizona Zoning Ordinance. Section 3 04 03 A land split map shall conform to the Street Classification Plan as adopted by Ordinance No 38 and any amendments thereto eiN SECTION 3 05 APPLICABILITY Section 3 05 01 The regulations contained in this Ordinance shall apply to all divisions of land created for sale or lease within the corporate limits of Apache Junc- tion, Arizona, defined by this Ordinance to be a land split Section 3.05 02 It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or other legal entity to create for sale or lease any parcel that is subject to the requirements of this Ordinance until an approved land split map complying with the provisions of this Ordinance has been approved Section 3.05.03 The division of any property into two (2) or more parcels, if a new street is involved, shall proceed through the subdivision process Section 3 05 04 The division of any property, the boundaries of which have been fixed by a recorded subdivision plat, into more than two (2) parcels shall proceed through the subdivision process Section 3 05 05 The creation of four (4) or more units having the right of exclusive occupancy coupled with an undivided interest in the land, such as in a condominium, horizontal property regime, cooperative, community apartment, townhouse, or similar project, shall proceed through the subdivision process Section 3 05 06 The creation of two (2) or three (3) units having the right of exclusive occupancy coupled with an undivided interest in the land, such as in a condo- minium, horizontal property regime, or similar project, shall proceed through the land split map process Section 3 05 07 Boundary adjustment plats and deeds, where the land taken from one (1) parcel is added to an adjacent parcel, need not be filed with the City of Apache Junction, provided that the proposed adjustment does not 1 Create any new lots. 2 Render any existing lots substandard in size or shape 3 Render substandard the setbacks of existing development 4 Impair any existing access, easements, or public improvements SECTION 3 06 ENFORCEMENT Sections 6 12, 6 13, and 6 14 shall apply SECTION 3 07 LAND SPLIT APPLICATION AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES Section 3 07 03 Application Requirements Applicants requesting land split map approval shall submit the following to the Department of Planning 1 A completed application form. 2 A nonrefundable $ filing fee to offset the costs of investi- gating and processing the application. 3 Five (5) copies of the land split map 4 Proof of ownership 5 A certified survey map of the property if deemed necessary by the Director of Planning due to inability to accurately determine property boundaries in the field, existing structures, odd-shaped parcels, ambiguous legal descriptions, or any other condition which would render a determination on the proper division of the property difficult in the absence of a survey map 6 Proposed deeds of conveyance Section 3.07 04 Land Split Map Requirements The land split map shall be submitted on vellum, transparent reproducible film, blueline or blackline prints, or other suitable medium as approved by the Director of Planning, at a scale large enough to show all details clearly (normally 1" = 100' or larger) on a sheet 8i" x 14" or 18" x 24" A line shall be drawn around the sheet leaving a margin of one inch (1') The land split map shall show or contain the following information 1 A title to read 'Apache Junction Land Split Map (case number) " 2 Graphic and written scale, north indicator, date of preparation, and preparer's name and address 3 Legal description of the property 4 Boundaries of the property showing distances (in feet and decimals thereof) 5 By note or a legend, identify any symbols used on the map 6 Dimensions of all parcel lines with each parcel identified by letter and indicating the net area in square feet of each parcel, and a legal description of all parcels 7 Name, course, length and width of existing and proposed street dedications 8 Course, length, and width of existing and proposed private access, utility, public service, and drainage easements 9 The identification of adjacent subdivisions by record data and land split maps 10 Delineation on the map of any areas identified on the flood insurance rate map as special flood areas 11 The location of existing structures 12 Certificate of approval This is to certify that this map complies with the requirements of the City of Apache Junction, that on behalf of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this land split map is hereby approved on this day of , 19 By Planning Director t Section 3 07 05 The Planning Department shall review the application and make a determination as to its completeness The Planning Department shall advise the applicant of deficiencies if the application is determined to be incomplete Section 3 07 06 Upon determining that an application is complete, the Planning Department may distribute materials to the following agencies for their recommendations 1. Other City Departments 2 Fire Chief 3 Any other relevant agency Section 3 07 07 The Planning Director shall render a decision on the proposed land split, of approval, denial, or conditional approval Section 3 07 08 Notices of the decision shall be sent to the applicant advising him that he may appeal the decision of the Director to the City Council Section 3 07 09 An appeal of the Director's decision must be filed with the City Clerk's Office within thirty (30) days of the date of decision The City Council shall consider the appeal no earlier than fourteen (14) days nor later than forty-five (45) days from the date of the filing of the appeal Section 3 07 10 The Planning Director and the City Council, in evaluating and making decisions on land split proposals, shall consider the following criteria 1 The land split proposal's consistency with the City s General Plan 2 The proposal's conformity to the City's Zoning Ordinance 3 The proposal's conformity to Article III and IV (Subdivision Design Principles and Standards) and other applicable sections of the City's Subdivision Regulations. 4 The proposal's conformity with the City s Street Classification Plan 5 The proposal's lot size and design with respect to the site s topo- graphy 6 The identification of any setback problems with respect to any existing development on the property and the new parcel boundaries to be created 7 A determination from the title information and lot/street design that a subdivision is not being created 8 That the signatures on the land split map have been affixed with India ink 9. Other pertinent criteria. Section 3 07 11 One (1) approved map each shall be distributed to the Director of Planning, the applicant, the Building Official/Zoning Administrator, and to the City Engineer I � it r SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTTON III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney r, , l, Qp,C„ ,..,...,,, . " ✓„,^ ','I li.r0" z AlPIZO P (6itzj o. 04pache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Agenda Approved by _'� June 10, 1986 Date Iter Consent Agenda MEMORANDUM T1: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PubiicHearing 21 THROUGH: !...,III,ICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER Old Business j�/Y0 FROM: L7'6HUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING New Business ja Postponed Item SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO AGENDA ITEM - JUNE 17, 1986 ORDINANCE NO. 457 (LAND SPLIT ORDINANCE) STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Sections 3.05.03 through 3.05.05 merely are restatements from the definition of subdivision under state and local laws, whose provisions are often over- looked, but could be eliminated if the Council feels this is redundant. Section 3.07.03 - Amend; "three (3) blueline or blackline prints folded into a 9" X 12" size and three (3) mylars (which may be submitted later, but prior to final approval ) of the land split map" . In setting the filing fee amounts under Section 3.07.03 please consider the $10.00 recordation costs and a $14.00 transportation expense in addition to administrative costs. Add to Section 3.07.03(4) "A title report dated not less than thirty days prior to the submittal of the application. " Submittal of a copy of the deed to the site, which might be an alternative, would not offer much assurance as to the ownership of the property. In Section 3.07.04 delete: "24" X 36" and add: "and left margin of two inches. " The word "existing" under item 4 should be corrected. Section 3.07.04 - item 13: delete "we hereby dedicate. . .premises. " An additional statement should be included: " . . .on this map, and that a sub- division as defined by state and local laws is not being created." Section 3.07.04 under item 16 delete: "that on behalf. . .accepted." 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Honorable Mayor andoG,ity Council Addendum to Agenda 2m - June 17, 1986 Ordinance No. 457 (Land Split Ordinance) June 10, 1986 Page Two In Section 3.07.08-Factors which affect the time within which a decision could be made on a land split application are: 1. Information that must be investigated by staff. 2. The number of applications that are filed and processed. 3. Quality and completeness of materials submitted by applicants and timeliness in applicant's revisions. 4. Priority allocation of staff resources. Because of the above factors, we would not recommend a time limit under Section 3.07.08, at this time. In the future if staff is consistently slow in processing time, then by all means impose a time limit. We will be striving for a two week turnaround. CRN:j1 xc: PZ-36-85 LAND SPLIT ORDINANCE Start N7 Submit: 1. Application 2. Land Split Map 3. Fee 4. Title Report Q Review By Agencies No Approved by Approved No • Planning Director? By Appealed City Council? Yes Yes Q Documents Recorded < End LAND SPLIT REGULATION Is a land split When is access When are ordinance and lot size street administered? checked? improvements City required? 1. Scottsdale yes land split land split 2. Gilbert no but adopted building permit building permit 3. Mesa no (a) courtesy site (a) assess. dist. plan review (b) scallop bill (b) building permit (City may install off-sites and lien the propert 4. Tempe no building permit building permit 5. Phoenix yes land split land split 6. Glendale yes land split land split 7. Chandler no building permit building permit 8. Kingman yes land split assess. dist. (� APACHE JUNCTION LAND SPLIT MAP 85-007 Q BM d65 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION A Division of W1NWIISWINEISEI N of Section 15, T.1N. R 8E State of Arizona ) CD o Gila and Salt River Base and county of Pinal ass AJ-LSM-85-01 Meridian, City of Apache Junction, N Cab A Slide 101 Pinal County, Arizona ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Fee Number. e E hereby certify that the within instrument is filed In the 33 00' N 89°45'16"W 131 97' official records of this county In Cabinet A,Slide Date: Time. zrm State of Arizona )) Reques — CD )5S N 11 M County of Wtness my hand and official seal CD W PARCEL A mCi On this the day of 19� Kathleen C Felix Pinal County Recorder 13,000 sq ft O before me the undersigned officer appeared By Deputy N who acknowledged themselves to be as owners. co also appeared before me OWNER'S CERTIFICATE C who acknowledged himself to be a Trust Officer of LI , at Trustee, N 89°55'02" W 131 87' Dedication and that they,being duly authorized to do so,executed the State of Arizona Z foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained 5 5. to M CD County of m - rn In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand and official PARCEL B o to '^ seal Know all men by these presents that cD rn 13,000 5 ft cn - asM�e(uerthe)sam of i a portion Trustee the have divided N q of CA N p 1/4 of Section Township ,Range m Gila and Salt R vT er Fise and xertd )cache Junia-(0 v=1 Notary Public County Arizona as shown mapped hereon and hereby publlGii Mis My Commission Expires: land split nap and hereby declare that this cap sets forth the Z Commissionlocation and gives the dimensions of the parcels or unite and laz streets and easementf conitttuting sane and that each parcel and N 89°49'30" W 131 91' w ¢ street shall be know by the letter and nameelven to each - = respectively on this map.to .. N et - - 41 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE Easements are hereby dedicated for the purposes shown CD o z hereon PARCEL C co O o 3 In witness whereof: as owners,here a o 13,134 sq ft o This Is to certify that the survey and the map of the caused its name to be signed on this map this_ _day of G division of land described herein was accurately done under , 19 CD p N Z my direction and that all lots are staked or will be staked and all monuments art set or will be set within one(1)year bp i-- Z N after recordation 1— In witness whereof. m FLOOD;%ZONE\`A° as Trustee,has hereunto caused Its corporate nm to be signed m by the undersigned officer thereunto duty authorized this co N R9°59'91" W I131�B5\ signature Date Registration xo Seal day of Si_ ) ov - , as Trustee ■ cm ml By. l �t e 1155 01' �� BM #11 Its r� CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL �1, This is to certify that this map complies with the GOLDWATER AVENUE !_wit. C 30 6p 12j0 requirements of the City of Apache Junction FEET Date of Preparation a"its map Is hereby approved on this ' and day of this land December 11, 1985 p19 SCALE 1" = 60' N ey. Chairman,Subdivision Committee or Planning Director By: Mayor(If approved by the City Council) Attest: City Clerk(if approved by the City Council) • ) ) Ilk Amok iyACHE�G2 2U ,. ♦~ PW z Y;;) 'r4P/Z0O' `Oity o 04pache 2unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT December 10, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL i THROUGH: �,.. ,,, MICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: l/`/4'�HUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - PUBLIC HEARING LOT SPLIT ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO. 457 Attached for your consideration is Ordinance No. 457. This is the most recent draft of the Lot Split Ordinance which was previously distributed to Council members on December 6. Mr. Nakagawa has assembled the materials in the attachment depicting how other cities in the Valley handle lot splitting activity. Unfortunately, we are on our own in attempting to find the best way to manage growth and development in a situation where lot splitting is a predominate means of creating new building sites. The rest of the Phoenix area has a development history of large tracts being master planned and subdivided. CRN:MJM•Jo Agenda Approved by f`/e. Date Item :s Consent '+7e^da Public ;-;:::ring Aa?� � �� Old B'JSI.i@SS --- New B,.c ess /, ;/ Postponsu it_m f 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 LAND SPLIT REGULATION Is a land split When is access When are ordinance and lot size street administered? checked? improvements City required? 1. Scottsdale yes land split land split 2. Gilbert no but adopted building permit building permit 3. Mesa no (a) courtesy site (a) assess. dist. plan review (b) scallop bill (b) building permit (City may install off-sites and lien the property) 4. Tempe no building permit building permit 5. Phoenix yes land split land split .► 6. Glendale yes land split land split 7. Chandler no building permit building permit Ps ORDINANCE NO. 457 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING ARTICLE III OF THE APACHE JUNCTION SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS "ommk BY SETTING FORTH STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND SPLITS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL Article III (Administrative Subdivisions - Land Splits) of Chapter 2 (Subdivision Regulations) of Volume II (Land Development Code) of the Apache Junction City Code be amended as follows ARTICLE III SECTION 3.00 ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISIONS - LAND SPLITS SECTION 3 01 SHORT TITLE SECTION 3 02 DEFINITIONS SECTION 3.03 AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL REGULATION SECTION 3 04 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS SECTION 3 05 APPLICABILITY SECTION 3.06 ENFORCEMENT SECTION 3.07 LAND SPLIT APPLICATION AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES SECTION 3 01 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance may be referred to and cited as the "Apache Junction, Arizona, Land Split Ordinance " SECTION 3.02 DEFINITIONS ,^ Section 3 02 01 LAND SPLIT. the division of improved or unimproved land whose area is two and one-half (2Z) acres or less into two (2) or three (3) tracts or parcels of land for the purpose of sale or lease Section 3.02 02 SUBDIVISION see Section 7.03.19 SECTION 3 03 AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL REGULATIONS The regulations contained in this Ordinance are authorized pursuant to A.R S Section 9-462 01 through Section 9.463.04. SECTION 3 04 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS Section 3 04 01 A land split map shall conform to all applicable policies of the Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan Section 3 04.02 A land split map shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Ordinance F— Amok Section 3.04.03 A land split map shall conform to the Street Classification Plan as adopted by Ordinance No 38 and any amendments thereto. SECTION 3.05 APPLICABILITY Section 3 05 01 IT The regulations contained in this Ordinance shall apply to all divisions of land created for sale or lease within the corporate limits of Apache Junction, Arizona, defined by this Ordinance to be a land split. Section 3 05 02 It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or other legal entity to create for sale or lease any parcel that is subject to the requirements of this Ordinance until an approved land split map complying with the provisions of this Ordinance has been recorded with the recorder's office of the county wherein the platted area lies Section 3 05 03 The division of any property into two (2) or more parcels, if a new street is involved, shall proceed through the subdivision process. Section 3.05.04 The division of any property, the boundaries of which have been fixed by a recorded subdivision plat, into more than two (2) parcels shall proceed through the subdivision process Section 3.05 05 1[L The creation of four (4) or more units having the right of exclusive occupancy coupled with an undivided interest in the land, such as in a condominium, horizontal property regime, cooperative, community apartment, townhouse, or similar project, shall proceed through the subdivision process Section 3.05.06 The creation of two (2) or three (3) units having the right of exclusive oc- cupancy coupled with an undivided interest in the land, such as in a condo- •'"1 minium, horizontal property regime, or similar project, shall proceed through the land split map process Section 3 05 07 Boundary adjustment plats and deeds, where the land taken from one (1) parcel is added to an adjacent parcel, need not be filed with the City of Apache Junction, provided that the proposed adjustment does not 1. Create any new lots. 2. Render any existing lots substandard in size or shape 3. Render substandard the setbacks of existing development 4 Impair any existing access, easements, or public improvements SECTION 3.06 ENFORCEMENT Sections 6 12, 6 13 and 6.14 shall apply. SECTION 3 07 LAND SPLIT APPLICATION AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 2 OF 6 Aft. Aft. Section 3.07 01 The division of land defined by this ordinance to be a land split requires the approval of a land split map by the Planning Director or the City Council. Section 3 07.02 The purpose of the Land Split Map review is to determine the appropriateness of the access and lot design with respect to the contours of the land, to Ankik determine if the setbacks of existing development are being rendered nonconform- ing with the creation of new lot lines, to determine if a subdivision is being created, and to determine whether or not the proposed land split conforms with City policies and ordinances Section 3 07 03 Application Requirements Applicants requesting land split map approval shall submit the following to the Department of Planning 1. A completed application form 2. A nonrefundable $ filing fee to offset the costs of investigating and processing the application. 3 Eight (8) blueline or blackline prints folded into a 9" X 12" size and three (3) mylars (which may be submitted later) of the land split map Section 3 07.04 Land Split Map Requirements The land split map shall be submitted on a transparent reproducible polyester film drawn with India Ink at a scale large enough to show all details clearly (normally 1" = 100' or larger) on a sheet 18" X 24", or 24" X 36" A line shall be drawn around the sheet leaving a margin of one inch (1") The land split map shall show or contain the following information 1. A title to read "Apache Junction Land Split Map (case number)." 2. Graphic and written scale, north indicator, and date of preparation. 3 Legal description of the property A0Mk. 4. Location and description of exiting and proposed monuments to which all bearings, dimensions, angles, and similar data shall be referenced Such data shall be tied to the City datum system. 5. Boundaries of the property fully balanced and closed showing all bearings and distances (in feet and decimals thereof) determined by an accurate survey in the field 6. By note or a legend, identify any symbols used on the map 7 Bearings and dimensions of all parcel lines with each parcel identified by letter and indicating the net area in square feet of each parcel. 8 Name, course, length and width of existing and proposed street dedica- tions. 9 Course, length, and width of existing and proposed private access, utility, public service, and drainage easements 10. The identification of adjacent subdivisions and land split maps by record data 11 Delineation on the map of any areas identified on the flood insurance rate map as special flood areas. ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 3 OF 6 OPionIr 12 The location of existing structures 13. Owner's certificate: Dedication State of Arizona ) S.S. County of Know all men by these presents that as owner(s) and as Trustee have divideu (under the name of ) a portion of the ; of Section , Township Range , Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, County, Arizona, as shown mapped hereon and hereby publish this land split map and hereby declare that this map sets forth the location and gives the dimensions of the parcels or units and streets and easements constituting same and that each parcel and street shall be known by the letter and name given to each respectively on this map. We hereby dedicate to the public the streets as shown on this map and included in the above-described premises Easements are hereby dedicated for the purposes shown hereon. In witness whereof as owners, have caused its name to be signed on this map, this day of , 19 By In witness whereof as Trustee, has hereunto caused its corporate name to be signed by the undersigned officer thereunto duly authorized this day of , 19 , as Trustee By Its 14. Acknowledgement State of Arizona S S County of On this the day of , 19 , before me the undersigned officer appeared who acknowledged themselves to be as owners, and also appeared before me who acknowledged himself to be a Trust Officer of , as Trustee, and that they, being duly authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained. In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand and official seal Notary Public My Commission Expires ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 4 OF 6 15. Engineer's or surveyor's certificate• This is to certify that the survey and the map of the division of land described herein was accurately done under my direction and that all lots are staked or will be staked and all monuments are set or will be set within one (1) year after recordation "4, Signature Date Registration No Seal 16. Certificate of Approval This is to certify that this map complies with the requirements of the City of Apache Junction, that on behalf of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, the streets offered for dedication by this map are accepted, and that this land split map is hereby approved on this day of , 19 By Planning Director 17 Reserve space for the recorder's certificate in the upper right hand corner of the map. Section 3.07.05 The Planning Director may approve alternative wording in the certificates. Section 3 07 06 The Planning Department shall review the application and make a determination as to its completeness The Planning Department shall advise the applicant of deficiencies if the application is determined to be incomplete. Section 3.07.07 Upon determining that an application is complete, the Planning Department may distribute materials to the following agencies for their recommendations 1. Other City Departments 2 Fire Chief 3. Any other relevant agency Section 3 07 08 The Planning Director shall render a decision on the proposed land split. Section 3 07 09 Notices of the decision shall be sent to the applicant advising him that he may appeal the decision of the Director to the City Council Section 3.07.10 An appeal of the Director's decision must be filed with the City Clerk's Office within thirty (30) days of the date of decision. The City Council shall consider the appeal no earlier than fourteen (14) days nor later than forty-five (45) days from the date of the filing of the appeal Section 3.07.11 The Planning Director and the City Council, in evaluating and making decisions on land split proposals, shall consider the following criteria ORDINANCE NO. 457 PAGE 5 OF 6 ilrooMIr 1. The land split proposal's consistency with the City's General Plan. 2 The proposal 's conformity to the City's Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposal 's conformity to Article III and IV (Subdivision Design Principles and Standards) and other applicable sections of the City's Subdivision Regulations. 4. The proposal's conformity with the City's Street Classification Plan. 5 The proposal's lot size and design with respect to the site's topograpi,„ 6 The identification of any setback problems with respect to any existing development on the property and the new parcel boundaries to be created 7. A determination from the title information and lot/street design that a subdivision is not being created. 8. That the signatures on the land split map have been affixed with India ink for recordation. 9. Other pertinent criteria Section 3 07 12 One (1) approved mylar each shall be distributed to• the County Recorder, the Director of Planning and the applicant, and one print each to the Building Official/Zoning Administrator, and to the City Engineer. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTIOd"", ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. av . A e n City Attorney ORDINANCE NO 457 PAGE 6 OF 6 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES '',r4 ITEM # MEETING OF 1/0 1 c MOTION BY: � SECONDED BY r YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL V UNANI1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ... i•► r ROLL CALL VPJE SHEET / A� NOTES , // ti ))( CNSJ c1) ' ; .1P) ..... tlift,,ktt - K y )7/ r,,,,,, . ,,,.. , _ \ , , , , \ i , 1C1())41111\ I . \) \ 0 0 c 1 rii ITEM # MEETING OF 1069 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ / COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR / I COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL / , , COUNCILMAN EIDSON / COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL / , UNANI'1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Ys' / yr/7 4,2 4 0 - zke ji," . -a`t v 4 t, ITEM # MEETING OF ///0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER ✓ COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ '✓ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO J MAYOR HILL , UNANI"1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL r ..... ROL TE EET NOTES y ;/! ..... .4 / ..P/ti ri)/ VI) (‘ pp, ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: CillYY1 b I SECONDED BY: (A-diG YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO / VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL / COUNCILMAN EIDSON / COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER _ V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR / MAYOR HILL if UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ttl/d1/46c_t a/ 6idh&di Q C, 0-,07,o� /1 -57 A1-14 414a° * 1 ITEM NO. 8 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 457 BE ek" RECONSIDERED. Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. P57, B )161: READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 457 BY TITLE ONLY. 3te[.. I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 457, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 457, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PQp.CHF✓ 4/0 U 1!`Ili' Z 9 7� 41?/ZO14P (6ity o� C4pache cOunction June 24, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO HONORABLE MAYOR,AND MEMBF,RS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1/ THROUGH. CITY MANAGER ' ( ) FROM. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: MANZANITA STREET, BETWEEN ' ARNER AND DESERT VIEW (AGENDA ITEM) As interest had been received for the paving of a portion of Desert View Drive, between Shiprock and Roundup, and Manzanita Street, between Warner and Desert View, this office has investigated the availability of right-of-way and found that there is no dedicated right-of-way or Federally Patented Easement on Manzanita for approximately 330 feet East of Warner Drive In these regards, the City contacted property owners to determine whether or not they would be interested in providing rights-of-way in order to pave this corridor. Of the four property owners contacted, we have received a response from Matthew Augustine (parcel 20) and Mrs. Arendt (parcel 23) who indicated they are not interested in having Manzanita Street paved, and will not dedicate necessary right-of-way. As we have not received a response from Mr. Holmes (parcel 15) and Mr Adams (parcel 26) at this time, it appears that a continuous right-of-way will not be available for centerlining and improving this corridor. It is requested that the City Council provide Staff with an indication as to how to proceed by considering the attached motion. RWB.sh Agenda Approved by "V. Date !tem Attached Motion Consent Agenda Site Map Pubile Hearing Old Business //��f�� New Business /L _.9._ + ^SI, nr iiti . File 100.051 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 i ) < I i' 1 ems' _ I I (1-1-- L 2 �'',d— ,'=�=K 33 QCD TO CIT 'r -- CITY OF A J. 1146/291 33' 33' QCD 1293/877 w 1- . �� vJ ` �, f I LU U I^ Icy `iFl �40 14 _ O N �D.. ,f-, A _ __ I I I' I MI ff.) I � , i tS l . -,o 1° I 33 I 1 I I C'' H , l r 165 I 1 ? - i i., , 0,„ I I CC o 1_, .�Z ' Nc, l`cl,S(�.J s.c 1 iti 1 Js- ,,,, Q ___ .. 3.. • _ I I=, ,__ OCD 1177/440 - r r G 1 QCD I I77/478 QCDI 177/439 1 A I , AQ/'im5 AUClUSllrvt ARENOtt. I 26 20 23 I _ • `5 1 -,.: ..: it A hicir 1 c ,iz yY I /' (, i� T 1 I No i I 24 0 27 , y el 1 1 a 26 ,1.3., I I I 1 33 0,9 4:f3 .1C' I. 33 u j PC'uNDuP ,i ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET / NOTES 0opT do) \„}/ /0 ' 4‘) t))t ! \ t g(D ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 1.0/1P YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ..•r COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 40) Il (Vol; CP) I Lt./ Or ill l ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR I� COUNCILMAN BALJO (� VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL V UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL /Nib. A ITEM NO. 9 ALTERNATE #1 I MOVE THAT STAFF BE AUTHORIZED TO TAKE THE NECESSARY MEASURES TO ACQUIRE NECESSARY RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN ORDER TO MAKE NECESSARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO MANZANITA STREET, EAST OF WARNER DRIVE. ALTERNATE #2 I MOVE THAT THE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY IS NOT NECESSARY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF MANZANITA STREET, EAST OF WARNER DRIVE. O� PQ ACHE�G 2 � n� ' O U 0 -40_ z 'IPIZOOk City o C ache 2unction � p June 26, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYORX*1 AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK 0 SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR SERVICES - APACHE JUNCTION AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Attached for your consideration is the contract for services for fiscal year 1986-87 as submitted by the Community Foundation. This item will be placed on the July 1st agenda for your action. kmc 4 se, , , . I ,t. `�J-// , //�-_-- 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION CONTRACT FY 1986 - 87 PARTIES: APACHE JUNCTION AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, INC. Post Office Box 2060 Apache Junction, Arizona 85217-2060 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 CONSIDERATION: In consideration of the sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) to be paid by the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, a municipal corporation, herein- after referred to as "City" to the Apache Junction Area Community Foundation, Inc. , a non-profit Arizona Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Foundation", Foundation agrees to provide the following services: I. Problems for which city funding would be utilized. City funds would be used for comprehensive health and social service planning, with priority assignment of needs, followed by program development efforts on behalf of the City. Additionally, important liaison functions with other planning/funding agents will be maintained (e.g. Central Arizona Association of Governments (CAAG), Department of Economic Security (DES), Rural Health Advisory Committee (RHAC) of the Central Arizona Health Systems Agency of Central Arizona (BHACA), Area Agency on Aging, etc.) , and such other functions further developed as benefits to all human service agencies/clients within the City. II. Specific services which would be provided by the Foundation to address the above problems on a continuing basis could include, depending on annual mutual agree- ment of the City and the Foundation Board: A. NEEDS/RESOURCES ASSESSMENTS 1 . Participate in ongoing needs assessment efforts, including those of the Central Arizona Association of Governments (CAAG) , the Behavioral Health Agency of Central Arizona (BHACA) , and others. 2. Conduct special assessments of unique community problems in the City (e.g. extent of the homeless, spouse and child abuse, teenage preg- nancy, drug and alcohol abuse, and other assessments as requested and feasible). 3. Survey neighboring community councils and state and local, public and private agencies and organizations, along with fraternal and civic clubs, churches, schools, etc. to identify local expertise, funding sources, equipment facilities and services available to help meet the City 's human service needs. B. PLANNING/COORDI'mSION/LIAISON FUNCTIONS emS 1. Provide the City with an annual plan based on the Foundation's assess- ment and prioritization of human service problems and needs, along with the Foundation's proposed strategies for helping to resolve these problems. 2. Serve as liaison for the City (i.e. as its local human service agent) to other planning/funding agents (e.g. CAAG, EVBHC, BHACA, CAHSA, United Way, and community councils in the East Valley and Phoenix). 3. Serve as a resource to the City for resolution of requests to the City from various agencies and organizations for funding and/or technical assistance. 4. Provide a community health and social service referral system along with an education/information service to City officicals and the public concerning human service problems, needs, programs, agencies, facilities and other resources, including how to make more effective use of resources (e.g. through direct contacts, newspaper articles, talks at community meetings, participation on various community and county plan- ning committees, and a human services directory). 5. Provide technical assistance and program development assistance, as re- quested, to new and existing local human service agencies, (e.g. devel- opment of a Board of Directors, establishing a constitution and by-laws, filing for incorporation, setting up operating policies and procedures, grantsmanship, funding sources, methods of gaining and maintaining public support). 6. In cooperation with the Apache Junction area's human service system, periodically evaluate the effectiveness, overlapping, gaps, efficiency and deficiencies in the system and make recommendations for improvements as needed. 7. Promote cooperative working relationships, fiscal accountability, program effectiveness, and coordinate, as appropriate, the efforts and resources of local human service agencies (e.g. Epicenter, Reach Out Food Bank, Salvation Army, etc.). C. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES The Foundation serves as a catalyst in the orderly development of appropriate health and social service programs/services to help meet related community problems identified in the annual plan described previously under B-1 . This is being done through grant-writing for funding support, advocacy, community education, promotion of coordination of services, consultation and technical assistance, as needed. Resolution of some human service-related problems is neither within the capa- bilities nor the feasible responsibilities of the Foundation (e.g. versus the City, State or other). However, the Foundation is in a position of being able to make recommendations concerning priorities of needs and appropriate other resources. A major goal, in this respect, is to help prevent human service needs of Apache Junction residents from outracing community and other resources for resolving them. The Foundation and its resources will assist the City in both short and long range efforts to help meet the area's rapidly growing human service needs and do so in an orderly and coordinated fashion. 3 Om*, III. Quantitative and qua .ative measures to be used to E Luate the services. Progress reports concerning services being provided to the City of Apache Junction will be given to the City Manager on a quarterly basis (or more often if a need is indicated) . Program evaluation can, thereby, be conducted by the City Manager and City Council in terms of how well the services described herein are being implemented. The Board of Directors of the Foundation will also review these same reports for additional evaluation of progress. Dated this day of , 1986. APACHE JUNCTION AREA COMMUNITY CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FOUNDATION, INC. Norman S. Hill Mayor President ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F. Alexander City Attorney .... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • dk-- J #' 'I C'1/4)(4/' (/' v,'-'1 ' 1 ITEM # � j9 MEETING OFF. I MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: .I ' a Y S NO. ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO 1 VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 10 I MOVE THAT THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CONTRACT FOR SERVICES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 BE (APPROVED/DENIED) AS PRESENTED. OR BE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: (---- t„svici-16-4 2 U :1 � z r "lRIZO P COity o acizeunction 0.. June 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 0 n THROUGH: CITY MANAGER7 FROM: CITY CLERK t/ SUBJECT: INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT - PINAL COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. The existing agreement between the city and the Pinal County Health Department for certain health-related services expires on June 30th. The attached agreement, already approved by the county, is the same as the one in effect for the present fiscal year. This item will be placed on the July 1st agenda for your consideration. p kmc Agenda Approved by Date Item 0 Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business 7�/tea _ /� Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 Pinal County HEALTH DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 807 1.CEIVcEO 001(IN1301 PINAL ADMINISTRATION BUILD ?NC E FLORENCE,ARIZONA 85V013 ,• 3$ TELEPHONE(602)868.58c %b 3vN 25 June 19, 1986 G O OD IS -I 8 - Honorable Norman Hill A W p- a City of Apache Junction 2 O 605 East Broadway Apache Junction, AZ 85220 a w a ai Dear Mayor Hill . 0- Enclosed for your review, approval and signature is 0 B the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Pinal E0 1 `' County Board of Supervisors and City of Apache 0 w Junction regarding services to be provided from .4 July 1, 1986 thru June 30, 1987 . 0 Please return the signed Intergovernmental Agreement a a and a cover letter requesting Environmental Health Services to Charles Teegarden, Health Department 0 0. Administrator on or before July 15 , 1986 . , 0. 0 c We look forward to providing services to your community a• 0 and working with you during the fiscal year of 1986 . 7 a a a- Sincerely, �' w y,L�, -)64611 /QG n en aA11:/° /mil a Chris G. Sexton, R S . Sanitation Program Director 0 m 0 0 0x a cc . W Rudman, Deputy 0 Pinal County Attorney y .0 a w a 0D w G. O ... O O y 'O e w 1 I. 0. c, a) a, b A w ) m .a E. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT 1 TdIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 2 , 19 , between PINAL COUNTY, a 3 political susbdivision of the State of Arizona, �►. 4 hereinafter referred to as "County, " and the CITY OF 5 , a political subdivision of 6 the State of Arizona, hereinafter referred to as "CITY. " 7 8 WHEREAS: 9 10 1. The parties are authorized pursuant to A.R.S. 11 11-951, et seq. , to enter into intergovernmental 12 agreements for the purposes of contracting for services, 13 jointly exercising powers common to the contracting 14 parties, and taking joint or cooperative action. 15 2. Pursuant to A.R.S. 36-165, 166 and 167, the 16 CITY has responsibility for health regulations and 17 certain health services within its corporate limits. 18 3. Pursuant to Title 36 Chaper 2, Article 4 , the 19 COUNTY has established a County Health Department. 20 4 . The CITY desires the COUNTY to provide certain 21 health services to its residents within its corporate 22 limits, and the COUNTY is willing to provide those 23 services. 24 5. Pursuant to A.R.S. 36-190 and applicable case 25 law, the CITY must request the COUNTY provide health 26 services within the CITY ' s boundaries and enter into an 1 agreement with the COUNTY regarding those services in 2 order for the COUNTY to have jurisdiction to provide 3 those services. 4 NOW THEREFORE, the parties to this agreement '^ 5 mutually agree as follow: 6 1. The services the COUNTY will provide fall into 7 three categories: Nursing services , Nutrition Services, 8 and Environmental Health Services. The COUNTY will 9 provide the Nursing Services and Nutrition Services 10 listed below to the residents of the CITY and within the 11 CITY 's corporate boundaries, subject to the availability 12 of grant funds where marked by an "*. " The COUNTY will 13 provide each of the Environmental Health Services listed 14 below upon specific written request of the CITY: 15 a. Nursing Services: to include Communicable 16 Disease Control ( sexually transmitted diseases, 17 tuberculosis control , and communicable disease 18 investigation) , Family Planning Services*, Maternity 19 Services*, Child Health Services* ( including 20 immunizations) , Community Health Nursing and Health 21 Education* (program in schools and community) . 22 b. Nutrition Services: to include WIC* (Women, 23 Infants and Children--food supplement and education 24 services ) , other nutrition-related services* and act as 25 a resource center for programs related to nutrition and 26 cardiovascular risk reduction. * 1 c. Environmental Health Services: to include 2 Temporary and Non-Temporary Food and Drink Services 3 (plan review, inspections, code enforcement) , Schools — 4 (kitchen and grounds inspections, code enforcement) , 5 Public and Semipublic Bathing Place Services 6 ( inspections and code enforcement) , Trailer Park and 7 Subdivision Approvals as 8 Required for State Health Department approval, and 9 Septic Tank Systems (plan review, inspections, code 10 enforcement) . Only those specific Environmental Health 11 Services requested in writing by the CITY and for which 12 the CITY has adopted applicable chapters from the Pinal 13 County Sanitary Code will be provided by the COUNTY. 142. The COUNTY agrees that the Health Services it 15 provides to the residents of the CITY shall be provided 16 on an equal basis with the residents of the 17 unincorporated areas of Pinal County. 18 3. The COUNTY agrees that the County Health 19 Department will handle complaints for the services that 20 COUNTY provides. 21 4 . The CITY agrees that it will have the 22 responsiblity for all other health services not provided 23 for by the COUNTY as listed above. The CITY will have 24 the responsibility for all other health problems and 25 compliants not identified above as within the COUNTY' s 26 jurisdiction. The CITY's responsibility includes , but is not limited to, garbage disposal, manure disposal and storage, and insect control. 1 5. The CITY agrees to adopt applicable portions of 2 the Pinal County Sanitary Code as part of its municipal 3 ordinances and regulations with regard to those 4 Environmental Health Services it has requested COUNTY to 5 provide. The COUNTY, through the County Health 6 Department, agrees to enforce said regulations with 7 regard to the services COUNTY provides. 8 6. The COUNTY, through the County Health 9 Department, agrees to assist and cooperate in the 10 enforcement and prosecution of violations of CITY 11 regulations involving Environmental Health Services that 12 COUNTY provides. The CITY agrees that it has primary 13 responsibility for the enforcement and prosecution of 14 violations, that all prosecutions will be in City Court, 15 and that they will be the reponsibility of the City 16 Attorney. 17 7. The COUNTY specifically reserves the right to 18 refuse to provide Septic Tank System services where the 19 CITY' s setback requirements for septic tank systems 20 vary from those in the Pinal County Sanitary Code. 21 8. The CITY agrees to condition the issuance of 22 building permits on COUNTY approval of plans for all 23 construction for which the COUNTY, through the County 24 Health Department will have plan review and inspection 25 responsibilities. 26 9. The CITY agrees to withhold business licences 1 2 for new and remodeled restaurants and bars until written 3 approval to operate is received from the County Health 4 Department. This provision shall apply only where the 5 CITY has requested Non-Temporary Food and Drink 6 Services. 7 10. The CITY agrees to withhold business licenses 8 for temporary food and drink (special event) vendors 9 until the County Health Department approves the vendor 's 10 operation. This provision shall apply only where the 11 CITY has requested Temporary Food and Drink Services. 12 11. The COUNTY agrees that no charges or costs 13 will be assessed the CITY for the services that COUNTY 14 has agreed to provide, nor shall any fee or charge be 15 imposed on any CITY resident in an amount different from 16 that imposed upon a resident of the unincorporated 17 portion of Pinal County. 18 12. The parties to this Agreement agree that its to 19 term shall be for one year, beginning on July 1, l9W, 20 and ending on June 30, 194,6. Either party may terminate 21 this Agreement upon thirty ( 30 ) days written notice. 22 13. The parties to this Agreement agree to contact 23 each other not less than ninety (90 ) days prior to June 24 30, 1986 and indicate whether they intend to renew this 25 Agreement and on what terms. 26 1 14. This instrument, together with any written 2 requests by the CITY for Environmental Health Services, 3 shall constitute the entire agreement between the 4 parties. 5 No statements, promises or inducements made by either 6 party, or by an agent of either party, that is not 7 contained in this written agreement shall be valid or 8 binding. This agreement may not be enlarged, modified 9 or altered, except in writing, signed by the parties and 10 enforsed hereon. 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered this 12 Agreement the day and year mentioned above. 13 14 PINAL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 15 16 127Q 17 18 CHAIRMAN 19 ATTEST: 20 21 lj / 22 Clerk , Pinal County Board of 23 Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: 24 / 25cm Y4, 26 Pinal County Attorney 1 2 CITY COUNCIL 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM 15 16 CITY CLERK City Attorney 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES d/j) 0*, `ic4))-tj ) j ITEM # MEETING 0 /# Vt MOTION BY: �, SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ . COUNCILWOMAN TAYIOR v COUNCILMAN BALJO , VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL t� COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • mnmoma ITEM NO. 11 I MOVE THAT THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND THE PINAL COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. cQACHF Jo O n U '1RIZONP cOity o. pache c&unction June 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGE • FROM: CITY CLERK 0-1 SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-23 -- ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. The attached resolution is being presented to the council for consideration at the request of the Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc. (AEMS) which serves of the local emergency medical services coordinator for Maricopa, Pinal and Gila Counties. The accompanying letter from Robert J. Miller, Executive Director, can provide you with additional background on their services. A similar resolution of support has been adopted by the council in previous years. This item will be placed on the July 1st agenda for your consideration. kmc Agenda Approved by Date Item 0 Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business // / New Business 7l/( = °T Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 frAi C1TY -OF ApACHE Jt3NCT14N �q9b 31% 25 P 2 25 ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, Inc. MICHAEL V VANCE MD ROBERT J. MILLER, PhD CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STEPHEN S JENKINS, JR TREASURER 17 June, 1986 REGINALD BALLANTYNE III PAT A BEAMAN,RN JACK BEAVER The Honorable Norman Hill DAVID H BEYDA,MD Mayor KEN BUCHANAN Town of Apache Junction JACKIE EVANS,RN 1001 N. Idaho Road PENNY) GIBBON,RN Apache Junction, AZ 85219 MICHAEL M.GRANT S.VITA GRAY RICHARD HENN RN Dear Mayor Hill: WILLIAM C JOHNSTON MICHAEL) KRENTZ MD Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc. has, for ten years, DENISE S LaHAIE served the citizens of Maricopa, Gila and Pinal counties as GORDON L NEDOM their "local emergency medical services coordinating GEORGE E PEREZ system". So that we may continue this vital work of SCOTT R PETERSEN MD MARY ROCHFORD,RN planning, evaluating and upgrading the quality of emergency care in our region, we must "demonstrate continued support, DAVE SAMUELS,CEP annually, by actions of governing bodies of counties, cities BARBARA A.SAPP and towns within the planning area, representing a majority WILLIAM R SCHILLER,MD CHIEF GALEN L.SHIRLEY of total population of the area". This is accomplished through letters of support (see enclosed) which endorse and JOHN M. M STEIN, D RV STEPHEN MD support AEMS in its role as regional coordinating agency. okom TERRY H WALKER Through the combined efforts of local and state governments, ALISON HUNTER WRIGLEY LINDA WYLLIE RN the medical and business communities, and the public, we have developed an emergency medical service system which serves as a model for communities nation- wide. Your support will enable us to maintain that system, expand into areas not currently served , and further reduce the toll of accidental death and disability in Arizona. 5829 North 7th Street, Suite 2-F Phoenix, Arizona 85014 (602) 279-2751 'OW IMak We would appreciate receiving your resolution for the upcoming fiscal year by July 30, 1Q86. If you have any questions, or if you require a direct presentation of our request, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert J. Miller, PhD Executive Director cd Enc1 RESOLUTION NO 86-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, RECOGNIZING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. (AEMS) AS THE LOCAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE COORDINATING SYSTEM FOR MARICOPA, GILA, AND PINAL COUNTIES AUTHORIZING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. TO PROVIDE PLANNING, COORDINATING AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE WITHIN THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (MAG) PLANNING AREA; REQUIRING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. TO REPORT TO THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ALL ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN IN SAID PLANNING AREA. WHEREAS, Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc (AEMS) currently plans and coordinates regional emergency medical service within Planning Regions I and V; and WHEREAS, Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc. offers emergency medical programs for the effective and coordinated delivery of emergency health care services, and WHEREAS, Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc. has a governing board which includes local officials and citizens representatives, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS• SECTION 1 That Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc. is recognized as the local emergency medical service coordinating system for Maricopa, Gila and Pinal Counties under the requirements of Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 41-1849. SECTION 2 That Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc is authorized and required to provide assistance, including planning, coordinating and financial assistance for programs and projects affecting local governments within the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Planning area. SECTION 3. That Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc shall be required to report to the Maricopa Association of Governments on a timely basis all actions undertaken in relation to local governments within the Maricopa Association of Governments Planning area PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON THE DAY OF , 1986 NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney O� (� 7//„ \\\,,,.... "IRIzoNP c6ity o C pache 09unctian .... July 1 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER 1 FROM: CITY CLERK/ SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 86-23: ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS In response to the council 's request for additional information regarding the Arizona Emergency Medical Systems, Inc. , I have today contacted the agency and spoken with the assistant director, Dr. Renee Gutierrez. Dr. Gutierrez regrets that they will not be able to send a representative to attend tonight's council meeting, but Dr. Robert Miller, Executive Director, is out of town and she has a previous commitment. Dr. Gutierrez did, however, provide the following information on AEMS: AEMS is a health planning agency dealing primarily with emergency medical services. They serve as the regional coordinating agency for the region composed of Maricopa, Gila and Pinal counties. They coordinate emergency medical services for the region to include establishing policies, procedures, practices, standards and guidelines for pre-hospital providers such as ambulance services, fire protection, paramedics, air evac and emergency medical training. The providers of these services must comply with and meet the standards established by AEMS in order to be certified. They have been in existence since 1976 and are a private, non-profit cor- poration under contract with the State Department of Health Services in accordance with legislative action taken in 1979. They are under the jurisdiction of and funded by the Department of Health Services to be responsible for developing standards and procedures for the delivery of pre-hospital care. Dr. Gutierrez indicated that she would gladly speak to the council at a later date if there is a need. kmc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES '� / CT )(di? 01/ ("1/ 761 ila,(0 ITEM # V MEETING 0 PLOTION BY: SECONDED BY: '6 " YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ I COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR V/ COUNCILMAN BALJO V VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANI"SOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 1111 .r► ITEM NO. 12 I MOVE THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-23, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, RECOGNIZING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. (AEMS) AS THE LOCAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE COORDINATING SYSTEM FOR MARICOPA, GILA, AND PINAL COUNTIES: AUTHORIZING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. TO PROVIDE PLANNING, COORDINATING AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE WITHIN THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (MAG) PLANNING AREA; REQUIRING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. TO REPORT TO THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS ALL ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN IN SAID PLANNING AREA, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PQACHE ✓,. O U „,,I L ; z qR NP �ity o� pacl�e unction �za Agenda Approved by Date Itern s ,••. June 25, 1986 Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business 12, /3 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCostponedltem THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM- CITY CLERK 0/ SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID FOR LIBRARY TELEPHONE SERVICE Bids to provide a telephone system for the new library/senior center were received from four companies. The request for proposals was to provide a total of 8 telephones, 7 for the library and 1 for the senior center. System features requested included internal intercom, call holding, call transfer, call coverage, night service, personalized ringing, touch-tone, call pick up, pooled operations, call restriction, and recorded message capabilities. The total number of telephone lines requested was 2 local pooled lines and 1 local private line, 1 in-state WATS line and 1 MESA-FX line for the library, and 1 local line for the senior center for a total of 6 lines. ,...„ A brief summary of the bids received is as follows. SUN COUNTRY COMMUNICATIONS --- provide training and service on equipment installed by other vendors. They do not provide or install a system of their own. AT&T MERLIN SYSTEM 1030 ($6631.22) --- This system has the capacity for 10 lines and 30 stations which is more than what is needed. Their next smaller system, the Merline 420, has a capacity for only 4 lines which is not suf- ficient. The Merlin 1030 does have all of the requested features. Their proposal included a purchase price of $5972.30, shipping of $25.92 and installation of $633 for a total of $6631 .22. I would not recommend any AT&T system at this time because of the poor customer service we are receiving from their office staff on the Horizon system already installed at city hall . CONTEL EXECUTONE EQUITY III SYSTEM ($4117 + cable and tax) --- This system has a maximum capacity for only 5 lines and 12 stations which does not even satisfy the immediate needs. Their quote includes installation, but not any of the required cable. While the system has all of the features requested, 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 Library Telephone Service Page 2 I was not able to get a satisfactory recommendation. One of my major con- cerns was their 48-hour response time on service calls. I could not rec- ommend their system on this basis alone even if they were able to provide us with the necessary number of lines and stations. INTER-TEL SYSTEM 824 ($4998 + tax, Total Cost $5257.90) --- This system has a capacity for 8 lines and 24 stations which meets the immediate need plus allows reasonable room for expansion. Their proposal includes all cable, installation, miscellaneous equipment, plus a one year warranty. Inter-tel will also make all arrangements with AT&T and Mountain Bell to provide the necessary lines and long-distance service which saves on staff having to coordinate with several companies at the same time. They provide on-going training on the system which is extended to all new employees. The system has all of the requested features and they have been highly recommended by other clients which include South Mountain Community College, Rio Salado Community College, and the City of Sierra Vista. Inter-tel 's service includes a 3 hour response time for emergencies and 8 hours for non-emergencies. Their service technicians are on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week which is of considerable value because of the evening and weekend hours that both the library and senior center will be in use. It is my recommendation that Inter-tel be contracted with to provide the necessary telephone service to the library and senior center. NOTE: These proposals have already been discussed with the city manager. In the essence of time and because Inter-tel 's base bid was for less than the $5,000 limit, arrangements have been made for them to provide the service. This item is being presented to the �-• council as a formality since the addition of the sales tax put the total cost over the $5,000 limit. kmc ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 8 04) /6j 'AP)(0 y-c‘ ITEf 1 # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 4464J1 YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER Amok COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ j COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO " VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V MAYOR HILL UNANI"^.OUS . IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL /wok Aft, • ITEM NO. 13 I MOVE THAT THE CONTRACT FOR LIBRAR ( TELEPHONE SERVICE BE AWARDED TO INTER-TEL IN .T AMOUNT OF -q Ppp,CHF�G'L O Cl� ,= O z ti q,p/ZONP c its o &ipacI e &unction Am June 24, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER �� FROM: CITY CLERK et,/ SUBJECT: RESIGNATION FROM PERSONNEL BOARD Attached is a letter of resignation from the Personnel Board submitted by Mrs. Jean Perkins. This letter from Mrs. Perkins was received prior to her appointment to the Board of Adjustment, but could not be considered at the previous council meeting because it was not listed as an agenda item. Mrs. Perkins ' regisnation will be placed on the July 1st agenda for your consideration. kmc Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business '11 � Postponed Item -- 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 RECEIVED N,, \, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION _-) ISOb JUN Il P 2: 22 • \ :\\ -- C ''\ I \\S- N 4 ‘\ '\. 4' N r\ i,, ,,, \* ) 0, ,, „, , . , t\ N ,, 1 R2LL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES pfl• Af`l ITEM # ti MEETING '')// MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL V UNANI1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 14 I MOVE THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MS JEAN PERKINS FROM THE PERSONNEL BOARD, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET. Qp,CHF✓ Alft. Aft. P GG :4)izowx Oily o @ cache 02unction May 22, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: LIBRARY DIRECTOR THROUGH: CITY MANAGER Z/ SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF LIBRARY BOARD MEMBERS' TERMS Two Library Board members' terms of office on the Apache Junction Public Library Board of Trustees will expire on June 30, 1986. The members are Eleanor Lewis and Jan Hiller. Both have indicated to me that they do not wish to be reappointed to an additional term. For this reason I have begun advertising for individuals who wish to apply for appointment to the--Library Board by filling out talent bank applications. If any have applied by June 23, 1986, copies of their talent bank applications will be included in the packet fbr the July 1, 1986 meeting of the City Council. Ask Agenda Approved by '"'-- Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business / New Business /4 Kn /1 Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 CACHFs'' Gy%; RECEIVED `t, 4 , O CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ' Z 1i8b JUtd l8 P I 9 -2ONP CO ity on &471ac/'ie unctzon TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Library BOARD/COP1 ON/Ct1MMI TTEE DATE: June 17, 1986 NAME: Linda Navarre TELEPHONE: 983-4504 (home) 982-0310 (office ADDRESS: 1800 S. Monterey Dr. ZIP CODE: 85220 Apache Junction, Az. OCCUPATION: Secretary, Apache Junction Area Community Foundation (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: High School graduate, 1968 PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: As Executive Secretary for the Community Foundation, I am active in all activities dealing with the Foundation. Am currently preparing to start a support group for the handicapped people in Apache Junction. ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: John Allanson, Executive Director, Apac4a. Junction Area Community Foundation; Mari Gardner, City Council; any member of Board of Community Foundation. NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. /1,x):04:7-ke24412, .. Revised 6/19/81 S 1 ture of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982.8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ,4 1 ):),)\1/4,)u • 1 ITEM # f1EETI►JG OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: /VOA; YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL " COUNCILMAN EIDSON l� COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR 1 MAYOR HILL 1� UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL PQp,CHP dG /CF1-4 ' 10, 9'PIZO__) NP W ity ot. &4rache cOunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Am Nab, June 16, 1986 Agenda Approved by tgV Date Item # Consent Agenda MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Public Hearing THROUGH: `� ICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER Old Business New Business 7�/4 /6' THROUGH: ,1 CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: 'JULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER Postponed Item SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - JULY 1 , 1986 EXPIRATION OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - PZ-1-84 (ORD. 252) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project was to have been a 15 acre extension to a travel trailer resort to be located at the northwest corner of San Marcos Drive and 12th Avenue in Section 29. The last extension expired May 15, 1986. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS The developer has indicated that no progress has been made that would enable this project to proceed. (Copy of letter in your packet. ) The developer has not requested an extension. According to Section 19.0111 , Article 19 of the Apache Junction, Arizona Zoning ,,� Ordinance, a Planned Development shall be reviewed within one year after the approval of the preliminary plan. The effect of this review is: 1 . The zoning reverts back to the previous base zone, or 2. The zoning reverts to any other appropriate designation (determined by City Council ) , or 3. If applicant demonstrates good cause necessitating an extension which would serve the public interest, the City Council may grant an extension of time not to exceed one year. (Update of final plans and improvement plans to current City standards required. ) The original zoning classification was GR - General Rural . However, as this site is located in a relatively developed area of the community, the agricultural uses associated with General Rural would not be appropriate with adjoining uses. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CJ .Y COUNCIL .. AGENDA ITEM - JULY 1 , )86 EXPIRATION OF A P.D. PZ-1-84 (ORD. NO. 252) PAGE TWO Staff would recommend that the zoning classification revert to R1-43 Single Family Residence Zone. R1-43 would provide large lots with conventional housing which would be compatible with other permanent housing in the area. RECOMMENDED MOTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the approved extension of one year ending May 15, 1986 for rezoning case PZ-1-84 (Ordinance No. 252) has expired and therefore shall be reverted to the zoning classification of , this classification being deemed an appropriate designation for the subject site. JAR:CRN MJM:jo MAY 19, 1986 Julie A. Reid, Assistant Planner City of Apache Junction Department of Planning and Community Development Jaw 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 RE: EXPIRATION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT P2-1-84 Dear Ms. Reid : This letter is to inform you that we have thus far been unable to put together a package to complete the planned development of the second phase of the Sunrise RV Park. As you are aware the original buyer ran into financial difficulties and was unable to complete the RV Park. The new owner of the RV Park is not interested in completing the second phase at this time. The zoning extension expired on May 15, 1986 and must now revert back to the previous base zone of General Rural . Thank you very much for your fine cooperation in obtaining the extension . I regret any inconvenience this may have caused you or the Planning Board. Sinc rely, g Howard E. Parks, General Partner San Marcos Investment Company 3815 E. Elm Street Phoenix, Arizona 85018 PZ-1-84 (PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 252) PROPOSED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO TH/PD TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1}--- ---- T ZIAY_ .SLUE ..-..I ----t Alger, I II I I I I I I l I I II I I I I I TH I I TH/PD I 1 II 1 1 I I II 7/FC _.3 I i TH/PD 111 I 1II ( I v I I I EL i , . ....-3 ` f-.'� WEST 12TH AVENUE ¢ 1 I N s CR-3 f I = e 1 a I� CR-3 N r 1 F. 1 1 E 1 r I I = WFST 1T1-1 AVFN(F LRIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINES . . SUBJECT SITE N i LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER GR GENERAL RURAL) SCALE: 1" = 400' ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 69) / �P /7/1Ya ITEM # I MEETING OF MOTION BY: )jilf SECONDED BY: 6/AA) YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER J COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ v MAYOR HILL UNANI"!OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ir. ITEM NO. 16 I MOVE THAT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT EXTENSION OF ONE YEAR ENDING MAY 15, 1986, FOR REZONING CASE PZ-1-84 (ORDINANCE NO. 252) HAS EXPIRED AND THEREFORE SHALL BE REVERTED TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF r_ I � i , THIS CLASSIFICATION BEING DEEMED AN APPROPRIATE DESIGNATION FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. (SACHE G'L U 6'h1)r...3s0 z '�Rizo (Oily i 4ache o2unction June 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER 1 FROM: CITY CLERK'.0 SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER CONTRACT As requested at the previous council meeting by Councilman Eidson, the subject of the city manager's contract has been placed on the agenda for your consideration. This request is in accordance with Paragraph 3(B) of the existing contract which requires that ninety days written notice of intent to renegotiate the contract be provided to the city manager. Due to the expected vacation of Mayor Hill and other members of the council , this item is being considered prior to the ninety day time limit. This item will be placed on the July 1st agenda for your consideration. kmc Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 1 T y EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT CITY MANAGER AGREEMENT made this 1st day of October , 1985, between the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, hereinafter referred ^ to as "Employer" and MICHAEL MCNULTY of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereinafter referred to as "Employee" . 1. In consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, Employer agrees to employ Employee and Employee agrees to work for Employer under the following terms agreed on by the parties hereto 2. The services to be performed by Employee shall be those of City Manager, as defined by Article 3-1 et.seq. of the City Code of Apache Junction, Arizona. 3. The term of this contract shall commence on November 7, 1985, and shall continue for a period of one (1) year thereafter, unless sooner terminated as provided for herein subject to the following qualifications: A) Either party hereto may give to the other party thirty (30) days written notice of intention to terminate The contract shall terminate on the thirtieth (30th) day subsequent to the date of receipt of such written notice by the other party. I �( B) Employer shall give Employee ninety (90) days written ' / / notice of its intent to renegotiate a contract for the services of Employee as City Manager prior to November 6, 1986 C) Employee shall accrue severance pay at the rate of one (1) month's pay for each year of employment; and shall receive credit for one (1) month's accumulated severance pay as of November 7, 1984. Should termination occur at some other time than an anniversary date, severance pay shall be computed on a pro rata basis. Severance pay shall in no circumstance exceed four (4) month's pay Employee's rights to salary compensation upon termination of this contract are limited to severance pay; and Employee specifically waives his right to sue for breach of contract, or any other claim or cause of action arising from the termination of his employment. Employee shall be entitled to severance pay should Employer not renew Employee's contract; and Employee shall receive such other termination compensation as is received by other full time city employees upon their termination such as accrued vacation pay and accrued compensation time pay 4. Employee further agrees as follows. To devote his entire time, skill, labor and attention to said employment during the term of this employment and not to engage in any other business or calling of a permanent nature during the term of employment unless authorized to do so by Employer Page One of Two r 5 Employer further agrees as follows- A) To pay Employee the sum of FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-THREE DOLLARS AND THIRTY-THREE CENTS ($4,333.33) per month ($52,500.00 annually) payable to Employee on the same payroll schedule as is consistent with other employees of the City of Apache Junction B) To reimburse Employee for expenses incurred in member- / 1 ships in professional organizations, professional travel, professional education and similar activities in an amount, however, not to exceed a budget limitation placed on such expenditures commencing fiscal year 1985-86. For fiscal year ending June 30, 1986, such expenditure shall not exceed $2,500.00. C) To furnish Employee all ordinary benefits normally provided other employees of the City of Apache Junction to include medical insurance coverage and participation in the State Retirement program, as well as paid vacation, sick leave, and compensatory time D) Employee shall be entitled to use of a city-owned vehicle on a twenty-four (24) hour basis. Said vehicle is not to be used for personal use. However, normal travel to and from work shall not be con- sidered personal use. 6 This contract shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona 7 This contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed on by the parties hereto, and no other agreements oral or other- wise regarding the subject matter of this contract shall be deemed to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. EMPLOYER. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION BY07lvl7 NORMAN S HILL, MAYOR 40 MICHAEL N Y, EMP OYEE PAGE TWO OF TWO ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES PC ,V51) /!i VriA/ V ‘1 ITEM # I MEETING OF INS° MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 44,Li- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER � f COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL _ +� MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET r ,(1) NOTES ,/� , d/ k cv , A , /P d , Ambk 1 oe—P) pr . v i* / :f<iii (-1/ ITEM # 11 MEETING OF 1/1/84 MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: Linajdi YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V7 COUNCILMAN EIDSON / COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER I COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR V COUNCILMAN BALJO / - MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 17 I MOVE THAT WRITTEN NOTICE TO RENEGOTIATE THE CITY MANAGER'S CONTRACT BE GIVEN. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET it: NOTES I' AV .0.)) \oi A 4 . Ni/ '1\1`' e3, ./),, :), c4,\) ( MEET ING ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: l\f\k62" vL SECONDED BY: 6' L YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER I COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR 1 COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V . COUNCILMAN EIDSON V MAYOR HILL i ' 1 UNANI1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ' Lf An•. Arn.. Alnik ITEM NO. 18 I MOVE THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M. , AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. , ON JULY 14, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M. , ON JULY 15, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. O� PQp,CHF jo U A--<. 61.. rlw' Z \c-:.., '9P/ZONP V ity o c pache cOunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT oak June 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: 54MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: adHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of June 10, 1986. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's office. CRN:j1 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA JUNE 10, 1986 7 P.M. WORK SESSION ON AGENDA ITEMS AT 6:30 P.M. PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS Mrs. Conway Mrs. Davies List in Apo., Mr. Vanhoy Ms Callahan Planning Mr Taylor Office Mr. Jorgensen Mr. Vehon, Chairman Mrs Reid, Staff Mr Newcomer, Staff Ms. Ortberg, Recording Secretary SYNOPSIS Agenda dated June 10, 1986 and Minutes dated May 27, 1986 approved as submitted. PZ-19-86 recommended for approval PZ-21-86 recommended for denial PZ-22-86 recommended for approval 1. Roll Call Five members present with two absent as shown above. 2 Jorgensen/Taylor M/S "I recommend that we approve the Agenda dated June 10, and the Minutes dated May 27, 1986 as submitted " Motion passed 6-0-1 with Mrs Conway voting present. 3. Chairman opened PZ-19-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing. 4 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding this rezoning request [ to rezone from.GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. 5 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 6. James S. Rundle responded and answered questions Showed a site plan which the Commission had asked for at the previous meeting This showed the access road, but not the lots 7 Chairman there being no one to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for the staff's recommendations. 8 Mr Newcomer stated that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site. If approved, staff recom- mends the dedication of rights-of-ways as a stipulation. 9 Chairman closed this hearing to the public. 10 Jorgensen/Taylor M/S "I move that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-19-86, an application of John D Rundle, John D. Rundle Jr., and James S Rundle for their property de- scribed as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 The applicants dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33'), the East thirty-three feet (33') and the West fifty feet (50') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at intersections. 2. That the easement sketched for the Commission by the applicant be included as part of this recommenda- tion. Aft Aft 11111r PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1986 MINUTES PAGE TWO 3 That this access sketch which divides the total property directly down the center, be a stipulation and not a recommendation and that the City Council not approve this unless this is a part of the total zoning because the Commission is very concerned regarding the number of lot potential We're inter- ested in not having any more haphazard and dusty access roads, hodge-podging t.iese developments /eek, We're concerned that the City Council take this as a definite stipulation. The reasons for this recommendation are 1 This is in agreement with the existing General Plan 2 It seems to be consistent with surrounding development. Motion passed 3-2-0 with Mrs Conway and Mr. Vehon dis- senting. 11. Chairman vacated his chair to the Vice Chairman due to a conflict of interest on the next case. 12 Chairman opened PZ-21-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 13. Mrs. Reid briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from CR-1 Single Family Residence to C-3 General Commercial District 14. Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 15 Les Judd stated that he was representing JAFCO and Asociates Stated their request and answered questions 16. Chairman There being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for the staff's recommendations 17. Mrs. Reid stated that this request does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site The local commercial General Plan designation does extend over this site. If approved, staff recommends stipulating the dedication of right-of-way. 18 Commission deliberated and asked questions of staff, and also the applicant 19 Mrs Conway asked if he would consider planned development. 20. Les Judd stated that if they knew what was absolutely going to go in there they might, but don't feel at this time that they do know 21. Mr. Taylor Feels that they should apply for the next lower zoning, C-2 Local Commercial District, which would fit into the General Plan. 22 Les Judd want to be sure they can put in the mini-storage, and this can't be done under C-2, even with a Conditional Use Permit 23 Chairman closed this hearing to the public 24. Conway/Taylor M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-21-86, an application of JAFCO and Associates, an Arizona partner- ship for it's property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Family Residence Zone to C-3 General Commercial District. oak PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1986 MINUTES PAGE THREE The reasons for this recommendation are 1. This request does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. 2. The Local Commercial General Plan designation does extend over this site 3 And, we would be setting a precedent Motion for denial passed 3-1-0 with Mr Jorgensen dis- senting 25. Chairman Mr. Vehon resumed his chair, and opened to the public PZ-22-86, and asked for the staff's briefing. 26. Mrs. Reid briefed the Commission regarding this application to rezone from CR-3 Single Family Residence to C-3 General Commercial District 27. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 28 Dennis Laubenstein responded and stated that he is the representative of the property owners who are applying for C-3. They feel that C-3 is appropriate because it is compatible with the General Plan and it is consistent with the adjacent properties. 29. Chairman There being no one to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for the staff's recommendations. 30. Mrs. Reid stated that this is a non-conforming use of the property for the repair of travel trailers Approval would bring this use into conformance with the current zoning or- dinance. No right-of-way dedications will be required. However, staff would recommend the stipulation of a six foot masonary wall or screening fence as required by Section 16 0505 and Section 16.0509 of the Zoning Ordinance This would be required for new construction, but may not be required for existing buildings. 31 Chairman closed this hearing to the public 32. Jorgensen/Vanhoy M/S "I recommend that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-22-86, an application of Ray and Lola Pershall for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from Single Family Residence Zone CR-3 to General Commercial District C-3. Any stipulations or recommendations are 1 the stipulation of a six foot (6') masonary wall or screening fence as required by Section 16.0505 and Section 16 0509 of the Zoning Ordinance. The reasons for this recommendation are• 1 It will bring the property into compliance with the existing General Plan 2 It is consistent with the other properties in this area. Motion passed 5-0-0 33. Mr. Newcomer Under Information and Reports mentioned the subject of private drives and access easements, which had been discussed by the Developing Coordinating Committee at two meetings, one to determine the problems and another to address the solutions These would be to forward to the P & Z Commission and the City Council Ask Ask, OPTfOr PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1986 MINUTES PAGE FOUR 34 Commission & Staff discussion of a site plan requirement 35. Taylor/Vanhoy M/S to adjourn Meeting adjourned at 8.40 p m Respectfully submitted, (-- C aries R Newc rfexecutive Secretary < f f ony eon, irman C ( yFsCHE✓G tiCl A sr►.►�, z \ 4 c �ZpNP c�/p it o &4pache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT June 11, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO*-7MICHAEL THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH J McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: /' HUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT l/ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of the May 27, 1986 meeting Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's office. CRN jl 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 Amok 111•0" PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA MAY 27, 1986 7 P M WORK SESSION ON AGENDA ITEMS AT 6 30 PM PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS Ark Mrs Davies Mrs. Conway List in Ms Callahan Planning Mr. Vanhoy Office Mr. Taylor Mr Jorgensen Mr Vehon, Chairman Mr. Class-Erickson, Staff Mr Newcomer, Executive Secretary Ms Ortberg, Recording Secretary SYNOPSIS Agenda dated May 27, 1986 and Minutes dated May 13, 1986 approved as submitted. PZ-17-86 recommended for approval PZ-19-86 continued to June 10, 1986 PZ-20-86 recommended for approval 1 Roll Call Six members present with one absent as shown above 2. Jorgensen/Davies M/S "I recommend that we approve the Agenda dated May 27, and the Minutes dated May 13, 1986 as submitted." Motion passed 6-0-0. 3 Chairman opened PZ-17-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 4. Mr. Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding this rezoning request to rezone from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. Stated that this request was originally for C-4 but the applicant has requested it be amended to C-3 5 Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 6. Dick Johnson stated he was the representative for this case He irk stated they originally had applied for C-4 zoning but after speaking with staff they amended their application to C-3, since this is in accordance with the General Plan. They desire this particular zoning because it is compatible with the other properties in the area. They are willing to pursue the recommended abandonments or to deed a fee interest to the City Stated that they have no specific plans for this land They currently have a contract for sale and the buyer does not have specific plans. 7. Chairman There being no one to speak in favor or in opposition he asked for the Planning Department's recommendations 8. Mr. Newcomer discussed location of the site as being along a city entrance with the quality of development being important to the City's image Stated that the C-3 district does provide a certain degree of protection Stated that according to the Public Works Director, it appears that direct access to Highway 60 may be pos- sible. Primary access should be constructed directly on Highway 60, with limited access provided by Cortez Road If approved, staff recommended the dedication of rights- of-ways as a stipulation. r►, 9. Chairman closed the hearing to the public 10 Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-17-86, an application of Sierra Enterprises, Inc , Deane K. and Hazel M. Jones; and Richard and Jennifer S. Johnson for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. Any stipulations are 1. The applicants dedicate the East forty feet (40'), the North thirty-three feet (33'), the West thirty- three feet (33'), and the South thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at the intersection unless the abandonment of E 17th Avenue, E 18th Avenue and S. Bowman Road has been accomplished on the perimeter of the subject site. 2. That a site plan be submitted to the City Council for approval before development of the property is undertaken The reasons for this recommendation are 1 This is in substantial compliance with the General Plan designation for this particular area on Highway 60. 2 It would seem that C-3 would limit the applicant to the type of businesses that would be appropriate for that area 3 To insure that the development of the property meets with the City Council's approval for an entrance into the City. Stipulation number 2 and reason number 3 were added by Mr Jorgensen. Motion passed 6-0-0 11 Chairman opened to the public PZ-19-86 and asked for staff bri 12. Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding this rezoning request to rezone from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone 13 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 14 James Rundle they feel this rezoning would fit into the General Plan of the City It's a medium density area They want to comply with any rules and regulations of the City and State. Stated they plan to develop the back 2 acres into 12,000 or 13,000 square foot lots They would be willing to put in an easement with gravel or seal coat on it 15. Commission after discussion, they asked the applicant if he would be willing to give a site plan before this goes to the City Council, since this could easily become a subdivision 16. Mr. Rundle stated that this would be possible Also, he would have no problem with continuing this case until he can meet with staff and make a site plan. 17 Chairman There being no one to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for the Planning Department's recommendations. 18. Mr. Newcomer stated that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the medium density neighborhood If approved, staff recommends the dedication of rights- of-way as a stipulation 19 Chairman closed this hearing to the public. 20. Davies/Vanhoy M/S "I move that we continue PZ-19-86 to June 10 with a fairly detailed site plan to be provided by the appli- r cant " Motion passed 6-0-0. 21. Chairman opened PZ-20-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 22 Mr. Class-Erickson briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone 23 Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 24 Raul Saldana responded and stated that their plan is to get one more lot out of this property in order to put a mobile home on it or build a home on it 25 Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition he asked for the Planning Department's recommendations. 26. Mr. Class-Erickson stated that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site If approved, staff recom- mends the dedication of right-of-way as a stipulation. 27. Chairman closed this hearing to the public 28. Davies/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-20-86, an application of Ruben and Rebecca Saldana, and Raul and Evangelina Saldana for their property de- scribed as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. Any stipulations are. 1 The applicants dedicate the North fifty feet (50') and the East thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at the intersection of W. Lost Dutchman Boulevard and N. Grand Drive The reasons for this recommendation are. 1 There are no access problems Each lot would have access to a street. 2 There is no illegal subdivision potential because all the lots have access to a street. 3 This zoning is compatible with the mobile home park that was granted by Pinal County The park is under construction to the north. Motion pased 6-0-0. 29 Mr Newcomer Under Information and Reports, stated that on May 28, 1986 will be the workshop on goals and objectives and possible policies for the land use element and community design element for the General Plan 4111, soak Also, staff is working on some alternatives for dealing with the lot splitting question dealing with private accessways, etc Stated that Mr. Class-Erickson is leaving to take a position in Pinal County 30. Mr Jorgensen under Commission Requests to Staff, asked the following question• if an applicant comes in with a plan that looks like a subdivision what limitations are there on a recommendation we can make? 31 Mr. Newcomer there would be a problem if a subdivision layout was shown and the property was developed according to the plan and the subdivision process was not followed 32 Mrs. Davies asked about the appropriate steps to take to file a zoning complaint 33. Mr. Newcomer responded to this question Stated that it is best to file a complaint in writing if you want a response on actions taken. 34. Mr. Jorgensen asked if there could be a site plan required to be a part of the zoning application 35. Mr. Newcomer Responded that to require this to be a part of the application the Zoning Ordinance would need to be amended 36 Vanhoy/Jorgensen M/S to adjourn. Adjourned at 8 10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, aril es1R`Ne4 mer, eat cuti ve Secretary JL Tony Vehon, Chairman /g ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r;. upg- �L to 1°) ITEM /1 MEETI►dG OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 414 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL UNANI"^.OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL r---t smnow ITEM NO. 20 I MOVE THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P.M. ROLL CALL • // Igi 1 / S4 ROLL CALL I PR SENT ABSENT .,�. / tw.S.C MAYOR MILL { VICE-MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ! iJ V / COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNC I Lwow TAYLCR ► I / ► COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER I e I V COUNCILMAN BBLJU ! _ ,j.COUNCILMAN EIDSON TOTAL f / I ICY STAFF PRESENT b bQ 1 .S: CITY MANAGER MICHAEL J. MCNULTY CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly / V �.,+ FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis { ,,�� /� cy.- DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Chuck Newcomer ✓ L' DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY Bill McDaniel (6 g/0-4'4'17 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman V ✓ _ CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch / Oa- . / ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph ✓ SUPERINTENDENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Jeff Bell v V DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY Pam Loui (=?(L2 . .. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ,I REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: Q u� 1 I fl;C• 1 r DATE: / • �� ADDRESS: f IV 37Anr- Rb At. AGENDA ITEM: 4J A i.f S.s C. I S, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK p NAME: Km eI4 ,/1 DATE: 7 // O L ADDRESS: 2 I V/ M % ix at 4d AGENDA ITEM: Reirag_JTAC4A___LIWC MN ue /s"--