The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986 09.02 City Council Regular Agenda p,CHF i'► O� PLEASE FILL OUT A "RE IST TO SPEAK" IF YOU C WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT CALL TO THE PUBLIC OR ON ANY NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. V ,,,N-v�N�.'�Y�y Z �'"; `s "lPizoNP V Zt 0221nctiov APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA (All items marked with an asterisk (*) will be considered by the City Council as a group and will be adopted with one motion. No separate discussion will be held on any of these items unless a Councilmember wishes to do so. In this case, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ) *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of August 5, 1986 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED VISITORS AND GUESTS AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Update on Street Improvement Projects PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 520, PZ-26-86, Application by Joseph and Natalie ..-. Riendl to rezone two combined parcels of 10 acres, located on the south- west corner of West Lost Dutchman and North Warner Road, from GR General Rural to CR-5/PD Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development. 4. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 521, PZ-27-86, Application by William and Betty Osborn to rezone a three acre parcel , located on East 20th Avenue, east of South Tomahawk Road, from GR General Rural to CR-3(MH) Single Family Residence Zone. 5. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 525, PZ-24-86, Application by Robert G. Casazza, represented by Ione Chovanec, to rezone a five acre parcel , located on the southeast corner of North Meridian Drive and West Lost Dutchman Boulevard, from GR General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District. 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 526, PZ-25-86, Application by James Payton, repre- sented by Alan Gillespie to rezone a 2.08 acre parcel , located on the west side of Cactus Road, 200 feet north of 4th Avenue, from GR General Rural to CR-2(MH) Single Family Residence Zone. 7. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 527, PZ-28-86, Application by Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, as a trustee of the Marie Arnold Trust, represented by Ruth Armsby, to rezone a 1.25 acre parcel , located between East 17th Avenue and East 18th Avenue on Wickiup Road, from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. 8. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 528, PZ-30-86, Application by Albert and Judith Folsom and Daniel and Carolyn Rafferty, represented by Daniel Rafferty, to rezone two combined parcels of 22 acres, located on South Royal Palm Road approximately 330 feet south of Southern Avenue, from GR General Rural to CR-2(MH) Single Family Residence. 9. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 529, PZ-31-86, Application by Virginia Wilson to rezone a 1.36 acre parcel , located on the south side of West Shiprock midway between North Main Drive and North Ironwood Drive, from GR General Rural to CR-2(MH) Single Family Residence. 10. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 531, REPEALING STOP SIGNS AT LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD AND GOLDFIELD ROAD; SAN MARCOS DRIVE AND 12TH AVENUE (With the Emergency Clause) 11. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 532, PZ-29-86, Application by Jerome and Mary Imperial , represented by Daniel Raffety to rezone a 4.7 acre parcel , located between South Stagecoach and South Acacia Road from Highway 60 North to East 18th Avenue, from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. ... OLD BUSINESS 12. RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 503, ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS. NEW BUSINESS 13. REQUEST FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-51-83, WINDSONG MOBILE HOME PARK 14. EXPIRATION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-26-81, ORDINANCE NO. 130 mini-storage, RV storage, and retail store complex at intersection of North Apache Trail , North Winchester Road and East Superstition Blvd. 15. PRE-APPLICATION LETTER OF SUPPORT, KENDLEWOOD MANUFACTURING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REVOLVING LOAN ASSISTANCE 16. APPOINTMENT TO YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD 17. APPOINTMENT TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 18. LEASE FOR PROSPECTOR PARK CONCESSION 19. FIVE-YEAR PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN r■. 20. FACILITY USE MANUAL AMENDMENT, SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER 21. AWARD OF BID FOR (TWO) POLICE SPECIAL CARS 22. AWARD OF BID FOR POLICE MOTORCYCLES 23. SELECTION OF DATE FOR SPECIAL WORK SESSION, FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR WATER AND SEWAGE PROBLEMS 24. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 25. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL An\ 26. ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS." i. .ate arm r CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 5, 1986 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on August 5, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. 0.014, CALL TO ORDER Vice Mayor Bakkedahl called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. INVOCATION Councilwoman Taylor gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilwoman Gardner led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Jimenez, Councilman Baljo, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Taylor, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl Councilman Absent: Mayor Hill Staff Present: City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Controller Keith Lewis Representing Director of Public Safety, Lieutenant Dan Scott Director of Public Works Rich Broman Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark City Attorney Arnold Hirsch Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell Director of Library Pam Loui Assistant Planner Julie Reid Recreation Supervisor Chuck Baker Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Others Present: Ms Lois Porter Oxford Dictionary Committee Mr. Keith Stachar 6301 E. Roundup Apache Junction, AZ Mr Tim Otis Empire Machinery 761 W. Main Mesa, AZ Mr. Randy Deming 1403 W. Broadway Apache Junction, AZ ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ,,.k, Introduction of Distinguished Visitors and Guests Vice Mayor Bakkedahl acknowledged former councilmember Thomas Damiano, and welcomed all those present. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Ms Lois Porter, representative of the Oxford Dictionary Committee, presented a check for the Oxford Dictionary set for the new library. Councilwoman Taylor and Councilman Baljo presented City Manager Michael McNulty with a plaque and expressed gratitude for his support and contributions to the community. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager McNulty introduced a new member of the Planning Department staff, announced that the city insurance policy has been renewed within the budgeted amount and that the deductible has been removed, that the street next to the new library is in the process of improvement. Mr. McNulty also reported that drainage work is being done on Idaho Road, that Tomahawk is being paved as part of the on-going paving projects, Prospector Park is progressing, and further stated that in reply to statements made that he has not complied with the City Code in making recommendations to the city council, every page in the council packets has the his signature which indicates a recommendation. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-35 AND ORDINANCE NO 497, TRAFFIC BARRICADE MANUAL Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that this resolution declares the Barricade Manual a public document, and the proposed ordinance adopts that manual, and further that this manual will enhance the safety of the public. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl opened the hearing to the public, and asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the item. There being no one wishing to address the council, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl closed the hearing to the public Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-35, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TRAFFIC BARRICADE MANUAL 1986, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED AND THAT ORDINANCE NO 497, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Aft, Auk -s Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 497, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TRAFFIC BARRICADE MANUAL 1986 BY REFERENCE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 497, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 503, ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS Mr Broman explained that this ordinance establishes engineering inspection and plan review fees, including provisions for liability insurance and construction assurances. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl opened the hearing to the public, and asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the item. Mr. Keith Stachar, 6301 E. Roundup, Apache Junction, addressed the council in opposition to the ordinance. There being no one else wishing to iok address the council, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 503, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 503, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS; INSPECTIONS, ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE, UNAUTHORIZED WORK, EMERGENCY REPAIR; CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS; ASSURANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, LIABILITY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE TO PERFORM WORK IN DEDICATED RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENT AREAS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES IP•••s Agok Amok Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 503, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Baljo seconded the motion Councilman Baljo requested that the fee schedule be further discussed at the next work session on September 2, 1986 VOTE: Unanimous ,01114, The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 515, PZ-20-86 Assistant Planner Julie Reid explained that this ordinance corrects the legal description in Ordinance No. 509, which was adopted in June of 1986 for rezoning case PZ-20-86. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl opened the hearing to the public and asked if there was anyone who wished to speak on this issue. There being no one wishing to address the council, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl closed the hearing to the public. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 515 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as l follows ORDINANCE NO. 515, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 509, AND ADOPTING IN LIEU THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 515, AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-86 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE /'"k CR-2 (MH), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 515, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 517, OBSCENE CONDUCT (With Emergency Clause) ) Lieutenant Dan Scott explained that this proposed ordinance deals with the problem of urination or defacation in public, which is not a sex crime and is not presently addressed by the City Code. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl opened the hearing to the public, and asked if there was anyone who wished to speak. There being no one wishing to address the council, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl closed the hearing to the public. urminnir Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 517 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO 517, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 10 OFFENSES, BY ADDING SECTION 10-1-24 OBSCENE CONDUCT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING PENALTIES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 517, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGE THAT THE TITLE OF SECTION 10-1-24 BE CHANGED FROM OBSCENE CONDUCT TO PUBLIC URINATION AND DEFECATION. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 523, AMENDMENT TO CLASSIFICATION PLAN ) City Manager Michael McNulty stated that this is a proposed amendment to the City Classification Plan by changing the Clerk Receptionist category from Range 7 to 9, and creating the position of Facilities Maintenance Leadman classified at a Range 17. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl opened the hearing to the public, and asked if there was anyone who wished to speak on this item. There being no one wishing to address the council, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl closed the hearing to the public. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 523, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 523, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 523, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Imrf! Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 519, PZ-23-86, MOUNTAIN VIEW LUTHERAN CHURCH ) Ms Reid stated that this is an application for rezoning of a 5 acre parcel, by Mountain View Lutheran Church, located between South Hilton Road and South Goldfield Road from East 21st Avenue to East 22nd Avenue, from GR General Rural to R1-43 Single Family Residence Zone, and further stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl opened the hearing to the public, and asked if there was anyone who wished to speak on this rezoning. There being no one wishing to speak, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl closed the hearing to the public. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 519, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. t follows City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as ORDINANCE NO 519, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-23-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO R1-43 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. "E\ Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 519, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 520, PZ-26-86, RIENDL ) ) Ms Reid explained that the representative of this application was unable to attend, and requested that the hearing be postponed until the next regular city council meeting of September 2nd. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 520, PZ-26-86, BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 524, PURCHASING PROCEDURES (With Emergency Clause) City Attorney Arnold Hirsch explained that this proposed ordinance allows the city to take advantage of bids put out by other municipalities. Amok Vice Mayor Bakkedahl opened the hearing to the public, and asked if anyone wished to speak on this item. There being no one wishing to address the council, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 524, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows. ORDINANCE NO 524, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 3 ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE 3-7 CONTRACT PROCEDURES, BY ADDING SECTION 3-7-6 ALTERNATE BID PROCEDURE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 524, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried Mr. McNulty brought to the Council's attention that the postponement of the CDBG grant item, which was listed on the agenda under "City Manager's Report", requires action. Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer explained that extra funds have been released through the State Department of Commerce, which in order to increase the City's request for funding, it will require readvertising of the public hearing Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT HEARING BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE SPECIAL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1986, AT 6:30 P.M. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried Amok Amok, OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS AWARD OF BID FOR POLICE SPECIAL CARS ) Lieutenant Dan Scott informed the council that two bids were submitted, and recommended the lower bid from Arnold's Auto Center in the amount of $12,384 46 per car Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE BID FOR FOUR POLICE SPECIAL CARS BE AWARDED TO ARNOLD'S AUTO CENTER, IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,384.46. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. BIDS FOR MOTOR GRADER ) Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson addressed the council stating that there are three options for the purchase of a motor grader from Empire Machinery through Maricopa County, and recommended Option No. 3 which is a lease/purchase of two motor graders with trade-in of $40,000 and a down payment of $26,000. Mr Tim Otis, 761 W. Main, Mesa, representing Empire Machinery, addressed the council further explaining the three options Councilmembers discussed the three options in detail with Mr Dobson and Mr. Otis. Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT THE BID FOR A MOTOR GRADER BE AWARDED TO EMPIRE MACHINERY WITH OPTION NO. 2. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor. Councilman Baljo, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Jimenez Vice Mayor Bakkedahl Opposed Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Taylor The motion carried. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl recessed the meeting. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl reconvened the meeting at 8 45 p.m. REQUEST FROM HEAD START PROGRAM City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that as requested by Councilwoman Gardner, this item was placed on the agenda. Councilwoman Gardner stated that Ms Susan Fender of the Head Start Program requested the use of additional furniture from the old library. p An l., Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THE HEAD START PROGRAM BE LOANED ADDITIONAL FURNITURE FROM THE OLD LIBRARY, SUBJECT TO RENEWAL IN 9 MONTHS Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO CLEAN PROPERTY, IVERSEN ) Ms Connelly stated that a request has been received from Mr. and Mrs. Dale Iverson for a time extension in which to clean their property, as they are residing out-of-state Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THE REQUEST BY MS IVERSEN FOR AN EXTENSION TO BRING PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 9-2 OF THE CITY CODE, BE GRANTED FOR 30 DAYS Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, SUNRISE R V RESORT, PZ-17-83 Mr. Newcomer explained that this is a request by Sunrise R.V. Resort for a major amendment to the planned development, by giving permission to sell units to be installed outside the R V Resort, and that currently there is a model home set-up and a sales office in the park, but are restricted to selling within the subdivision. Mr. Newcomer stated that staff feels this is an inappropriate use of the property and would be better served in a commercial zoning district Mr. Randy Deming, 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction, partner in Sunrise R V Resort, addressed the council, requesting approval of the amendment to the planned development oak. Mr. Newcomer further stated that the Zoning Administrator had been consulted, and the recommendation was that all sales should be for installation within the park only Mr. Deming stated that at present sales are being conducted out of Mesa, which causes Apache Junction to lose revenue from the resulting sales tax. Councilwoman Taylor suggested opening an office on a commercial zoned property. Mr. McNulty suggested that if it is logical to sell these units from an area such as Sunrise, than logically accessories for these buildings, awnings, and such, could also be sold. Ms Shirley Vitale, resident of Sunrise R.V. Resort, addressed the council in favor of the request, pointing out that Apache Junction should take advantage of the chance for additional sales tax revenue rather than Mesa getting the taxes. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT THE REQUEST FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUNRISE R V RESORT BE POSTPONED UNTIL A LEGAL OPINION CAN BE GIVEN, AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 eiro^nr Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-30, SL 8312-1, APACHE VILLA IV STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT ) ) Mr. Broman stated that this is a request to Pinal County to assess property owners for a Street Light Improvement District in Apache Villa IV, in which manner the County will collect the funds which will be transferred to the City for payment of lights and energy to Salt River Project. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-30, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO TAXATION, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, SUBJECT TO TAXATION, AND WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SL-8312-1, A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR THE ANNUAL EXPENSE OF THE SAID MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM AND APPOINTMENT TO LIBRARY BOARD ) Director of Library Pam Loui stated that Rosaline Debnam has resigned from the Library Board, and that there are two vacancies presently existing. Ms Loui further stated that the Library Board recommends the appointment of Terry Spence, and that another Talent Bank application has been received. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THE RESIGNATION OF ROSALINE DEBNAM FROM THE LIBRARY BOARD, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET; AND THAT TERRY L. SPENCE BE APPOINTED TO THE LIBRARY BOARD, SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1989 Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT FOR USE OF SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell outlined the agreement and stated that the Pinal/Gila Council for Senior Citizens approved this agreement. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND THE PINAL/GILA COUNCIL FOR SENIOR CITIZEN'S FOR THE USE OF THE SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion oink oak VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD Mr. Bell stated that Norma LeBario has resigned from the Youth Advisory Board, and that there are no Talent Bank Amak Applications on file at this time. Councilwoman Taylor suggested that Norma and Rosaline Debam, who resigned from the Library Board, be given recognition for their service on these boards Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT THE RESIGNATION OF NORMA LEBARIO FROM THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES Mr. Broman explained that this is a request to extend the contract with O'Dell & Associates to provide engineering services with the same hourly rates. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT AS PREVIOUSLY ENTERED INTO WITH O'DELL & ASSOCIATES BE EXTENDED TO JUNE 30, 1987. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. 'oak FORMATION OF AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR FORMATION OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Councilwoman Taylor explained that there have been several citizen requests to form a committee to decide if the citizens wish the formation of a Design Review Board. Councilman Jimenez stated that staff is recommendation that the council deferr this committee until BRW is completed with the General Plan studies, which includes design review. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF FIVE MEMBERS BE FORMED TO STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF FORMING A DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FOR APACHE JUNCTION AND THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR TALENT BANK APPLICATIONS FOR THE AD HOC COMMITTEE, AND IF THIS COMMITTEE IS FORMED THAT THEY CONSULT AND WORK WITH BRW. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. Councilman Jimenez stated that the city is paying BRW to study this issue, and the forming of this committee would be premature. Councilmembers discussed the necessity of the Ad Hoc Committee, or the possibility that it would be premature 4 s VOT In Favor Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson Opposed• Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl The motion failed. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PINAL COUNTY FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO IRONWOOD DRIVE) ) Mr. Broman stated that this is a proposed intergovernmental agreement with Pinal County to improvement Ironwood Drive between Southern and Baseline Roads, and that the motion is not to approve the agreement, but directing staff to coordinate with Pinal County to prepare an agreement. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, BE AUTHORIZED TO COORDINATE WITH PINAL COUNTY IN THE PREPARATION OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO IRONWOOD (VINEYARD) DRIVE BETWEEN SOUTHERN AVENUE AND BASELINE ROAD. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING, AUGUST 11, 1896 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT A SPECIAL MEETING BE HELD ON AUGUST 11, 1986, AT 6.30 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 2, 1986, AT 6.00 P.M., IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Vice Mayor Bakkedahl announced the grand opening of ARC, to which everyone is welcome to attend Councilman Jimenez reported on the Little League trip to the Firebird game. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Councilman Eidson requested that Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell take action to eliminate children from using improper language or actions at the Community Swimming Pool. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 10 28 P M Councilman Eidson seconded the motion �s VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. *Consent Agenda Items are as follows: *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from the Regular Meeting of July 15, 1986 /\ ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA NORMAN S. HILL Mayor ATTEST• KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 4)1°' /13V ej) el/t? ITEM # MEETING OF 6� MOTION BY; ec SECONDED BY: v YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER t///,:t COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL 19 UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 5 1 a ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 I MOVE THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 520, PZ-26-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE, AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE PQACHF de" (dr 1/0_, U f,,v, ,, A. r w a Z .Ju y_ '9,?IZOIN1P `pity o C pache 079unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I. _ _ ;ua ,A,p�,'..— `/ _ /1"� July 9, 1986 _",,ent agenda 6771...47.7 �/ -- Id business --- MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL � ` ti, B • � us;ness THROUGH: MICHAEL J. MCNULTY, CITY MANAGER �% � .. � = coned Item THROUGH: i CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: (� ,AJULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - AUGUST 5, 1986 PZ-26-86 ORDINANCE NO. 520 BACKGROUND APPLICANT. Joseph and Natalie Riendl REPRESENTATIVE Michael Mecsey (Skill Construction) LOCATION: Southwest corner of W. Lost Dutchman and N. Warner Road CURRENT ZONING. General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING• Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development CR-5/PD GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION. Medium/High Residential Opportunity NO. OF PARCELS: Two COMBINED GROSS ACREAGE: 10 acres COMBINED NET ACREAGE: 8.3 acres CURRENT LAND USE: vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE• North - vacant South - vacant East - single family residence, vacant, and commercial horse stable West - vacant SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Business Zone CB-2 and Mobile Home Park MHP (Pinal County) South - General Rural GR East - General Rural GR West - General Rural GR and proposed Local Commercial District C-2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS. flat topography with a couple of minor washes 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND 'Y COUNCIL "` AGENDA ITEM - AUGUST 0, 1986 PZ-26-86 ORDINANCE NO. 520 PAGE TWO PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a 96 unit townhouse subdivision by planned development. The design of the private streets serve a twofold purpose of 1 ) discouraging use of the streets by non-residents, and 2) counteracting the effects of urban congestion and monotony while providing the environmental amenities. The private streets will be maintained through a homeowner's association. Perimeter streets will be improved prior to occupancy along with street lights and fire hydrants. Location of the main entrance on a major arterial should serve the needs of the development. Additional entrances have been provided on Warner and Windsong. Sewage will be provided through an agreement with the Pinal County development, Mesa Grande, to the north. Pinal County previously requested that Mesa Grande install a treatment facility of oversize capacity to allow adjoining developments to use it. The use of satellite treatment plants will aid the community in the future as sewer lines to these shared facilities could be converted for a conveyance system for a main treatment plant in the future. As developments occur they will be designed to carry sewage offsite. Mesa Grande will benefit in three ways: 1 . developers connecting into the system will pay for a portion of the facility; 2. developers connecting to the system will provide additional reuse (gray) irrigation water for Mesa Grande recreational uses; and 3. it will reduce the drain of the water table by using "gray" water for irrigation in lieu of purchasing ground water for this purpose which will also be less expensive. Ample open space has been provided around the housing units as well as around .�. the perimeter of the project. Additional recreation facilities have been provided for residents of the development. The guideline provided for a density of 5-10 units per acre would be 15% open space. Parking has been provided in close proximity to the units served with additional landscape areas provided. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The conceptual plan submitted for this development shows a genuine effort to comply with the intent and purpose of the Planned Development Ordinance. The design of the project is creative and shows attention to the needs of the future residents. Location of a Local Commercial District to the west and a commercial district to the north should aid in providing this quality development an attractive, healthful , stable environment for living, shopping, etc. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CI "'NCOUNCIL AGENDA ITEM - AUGUST 5, 1986 PZ-26-86 ORD. NO. 520 PAGE THREE The location, design, size and uses are consistent with the General Plan. A municipal park is located within approximately lz miles, access to the equestrian trail/recreational system is approximately z mile, and Four Peaks Elementary School is approximately 2 miles. This developer has demonstrated the quality of his construction Acoma Estates, located to the south and west of this project. The construction of Acoma Estates and with quality development of this site, will set the tone for future development in this area and may well be the turning point to permanent quality .-. development in this area of the community. This developer has demonstrated his ability to cooperate with the City. Staff would recommend approval stipulating the dedication of the North fifty feet (50' ) and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of Parcel 1 , and the South thirty-three feet (33' ) and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of Parcel 2 for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at intersections. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of July 8, 1986, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion. (Davies/Conway 7-0-0) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-26-86, an application of Joseph and Natalie Riendl for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5/PD Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . The applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50' ) and the East thirty- three feet (33' ) of Parcel 1 , and the South thirty-three feet (33' ) and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of Parcel 2 for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at intersections. 2. That plans for landscaping be included as a part of the zoning require- ment. The plans for landscaping be included in the preliminary plan approval process. The reasons for these recommendations are: 1 . The developer is to be commended for taking the responsibility for sewage treatment, streets, lighting, water retention, and in general being concerned about the future of Apache Junction by using the planned development approach. 2. The plans are consistent with the General Plan and set the tone for quality development in the northwest area of Apache Junction. 3. This zoning request conforms to Section 19.0109 of the Zoning Ordinance which includes general criteria for planned development. " HONORABLE MAYOR AND °'.Y COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM - AUGUST 1986 PZ-26-86 ORD. NO. 520 PAGE FOUR STIPULATIONS IN THE ORDINANCE 1 . The applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50' ) and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of Parcel 1 , and the South thirty-three feet (33' ) and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of Parcel 2 for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at intersections. JAR:CRN:MJM•jo o.. PZ-26-86 GENERAL RURAL (GR) to CR-5/PD MULTIPLE FAMILY BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT I I I Pinal County I I MHP I State ljnd leased 1 BLM 1...-- PinalI County 1 equipment I CB-2 I i storage I I I yard1- - - -- - - - ..... - - - _ _ - - - _____ ...j -- ___ - --_1 W. Lost Dutchman Blvd. --— — ---I' — — — — -- - — — — —— 1/ I 1 vacant SFH vacant I I Proposed I I I C-2 I vacant 1 L_ _ —y I 1 I GR Horse I vacant I ./.4/• ›, 1 W. Windsons St. ' o I stable U i I L I Acana Estates I vacant '... cd sa. m 0 1 CR-5 I coin � 1 _ _ _ 1 2 \ _ _ ___ __ o I .Q — 7/ti1gRMuinka — - r---t L s s /"-1 I I a_ I Z I ... 31 I ITH I a Z I TH I I I 1 I I 1 z . - - --) --= L—� W. toothi i I t. 7 SUBJECT SITE i 1"--; I ; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) N L--.1 i L 1 IScale. 0 300 600 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From General Rural To CR5-PD 2 General Rural CR%-PD 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for' Town Houses 3. Size of your property: 10 [x ] acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? nothing 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North nothing South Condo' s East nothing West nothing 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: Parcel No. 1 - Lot 5S-e-c-t-7-1-8-71717-787 Parcel No. 2 - Lot 8 Seem, 18 Tin— E: (67_ Section 18 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? 100-33-003,100-33-006 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? to allow a subdivision of Town Houses to be built (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed Application Received by: 2) ,\,__ Receipt No. `C)'T- Fee Amount 0 - Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/35 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed Michael Mecsey as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the ty of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #1 this ap • do orm.) tf X (I) Joseph & Natalie Riendl � (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) P n. mc 102875 907-279-1486 (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) Anchorage, Alaska 99510 (City, State, Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone.Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Hailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State,Zip Code) STATE OF ��2/ �� ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before 1 ) SS me this jq day of /) , 19 c 11 , COUNTY OF �1(¢.tf c ,c ) by ( My Commission Expires. C��fl lcs��"1 L;r'rJ;;:a1 , j � �T� ?! LYri NOTAR � Y PILIt �t 10 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at their request Michael Mecsey (Print representative's name) gnature o r�e�at� e) 1R335. I FFt)-, St _Siii try 4 894-11894 ( ailing a dress) (Phone number) Tp*nne Arizona 85281 .ate, Zip Code) STATE CF y� r, ,t� ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged bef re SS me this icf day of /r/61. , 19 K, CO'JlTY CF��(2Cfrpir2 ) by: '_ Ny Commission Expires.rtidj NO RY P L I Page 2 of 2 r3 /'\ ORDINANCE NO. 520 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTIFIti LL' S1I-ICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-26-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL 1 The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as Lot 5 and Lot 8 in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona r be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-5/PD Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development 2 The approval of the zoning district classification shall be construed as only concept approval for the base zoning and shall serve as official approval of the base zoning amendment to the Zoning Map 3 Development of said property shall be in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 of the Zoning Ordinance The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes, policies, guides, and detailed standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improve- ments 4 The applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50') and the East thirty-three feet (33') of Parcel 1, and the South thirty-three feet (33') and the East thirty-three feet (33') of Parcel 2 for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at intersections. 5. That plans for landscaping be included as a part of the zoning requirement The plans for landscaping be included in the preliminary plan approval process SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ORDINANCE 520 PAGE TWO OF TWO ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES eA ITEM # MEETING OF v MOT I ON BY: 11\ `'\A SECONDED BY: JIL-PC * YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ I COUNCILMAN BALJO V , VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER E MAYOR HILL J UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES t/l) 4( 1,1( i 41-1 ITEM ## MEETING OF MOTION BY: WM SECONDED BY: Of. YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ V �iI1t�tl81q,4P4�.�?4�0'F�- COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ti COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL :/// UNANI"^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ,/ ITEM NO. 3 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 520, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 520, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 520, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 520, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 521 , PZ-27-86 ,,.,, 2 . WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE, AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING '.` CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE (riPkC HE do r 0 i,c) ,t ,, ...,,\-6, _ , 1,..y '9,9/zoOs cOity o I4pache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT July 28, 1986 ,''� MEMORANDUM Ti:,� THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: l*MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM• t �l CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: L� REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PUBLIC HEARING - PZ-27-86 - ORDINANCE NO. 521 BACKGROUND APPLICANT: William and Betty Osborn REPRESENTATIVE: John Gargrave LOCATION: East 20th Avenue, east of S. Tomahawk Road CURRENT ZONING: GR General Rural PROPOSED ZONING: CR-3(MH) Single Family Residence Zone PROPOSED USE ON APPLICATION: "to better utilize the land" GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium/High Density Residential Opportunity NO. OF PARCELS: One .-. NET ACREAGE: Three CURRENT LAND USE: Subject site - one mobile home and detached garage North - vacant South - mobile homes East - mobile homes West - mobile homes SURROUNDING ZONING: North - GR General Rural South - GR General Rural and TH Trailer Homesite Zone East - GR General Rural West - TH Trailer Homesite Zone SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Slightly sloping terrain. Existing development on southwest corner of parcel . Agenda Approved by r Date Item # Consent Agenda c>�/L Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Memorandum to: TheAonorable Mayor and City Council^ PZ-27-86 - July 28, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The CR-3 (MH) zone permits lot sizes of 7,000 square feet in subdivisions or 11,000 square feet if off-site improvements are not installed. No subdivision process has been initiated for this site, however, the CR-3 designation would permit up to 18 lots to be created at 7,000 square feet per lot or 11 lots at 11,000 square feet per lot. Unless the applicant is intending to proceed immediately with subdivision of the site, staff recommends the CR-2 (MH) designation, so that zoning designations and actual level of potential development more closely correlate. Also, the applicant should be advised that the creation of four or more parcels by an individual '.... or a group of individuals acting in concert constitutes a subdivision under state and city laws and that certain lot splitting activity is regulated by the City's lot split ordinance. Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan density for the neighborhood. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the North and South thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their regular meeting of July 22, 1986, after public hearing, voted to approve the following motion: (M/S Taylor/Vanhoy 6-1-0 with Mr. Vehon dissenting) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-27-86, an application of William and Betty Osborn, represented by John Gargrave for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) , changing to CR-3 (MH) to CR-2 (MH) as we discussed. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. The applicants dedicate the North and South thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes. ....... 2. If the property owners divide this up into more than three parcels, they would be obligated to comply by the subdivision laws of the State of Arizona. 3. Applicants show a sketch indicating how the property on which the mobile home is located will be split off from the rest of the site. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. The General Rural designation that the applicant is in is nothing more than a holding designation and he is entitled to a rezoning. 2. It is the best use of the property. " STIPULATIONS IN THE ORDINANCE 1. The applicants dedicate the North and South thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. Ordinance No. 521 contains the roadway dedication stipulation. If the Council concurs with the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for CR-2 (MH) , it will be necessary to amend Ordinance No. 521, since it has been drafted as CR-3(MH) . PZ-27-86 REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3(MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE t H i I t E. 18th Ave. - cc ro ..... i —. In GR GR VACANT �; E. 19th Ave. MH ✓ T H 1 MH MH G R ``' Z E. 20th Ave. CD 1-4= tN Y u i >• c MH MH 1 MH MH C� o o GR TH GR 3 28 co 1 x N VACANT MH MH MH N N 0 t 300 600 i ! FEET SUBJECT SITE (/_1. of (o � �a t , may 0I/ o v \c ry<� r r7 h/ /11 / / / CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From General Rural ToCR H 3) 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? Residential-medium to high density oppurtunities 3. Size of your property: 440'x330' (145.200) [ ] acres lod square feet 4. What is built on your property now? mobile home--two car garage 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North vacant land South mobile homes East mobile home and house West mobile homes 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: S 1/2 SW 1/4 NW 1/4 SW 1/4 Except W. 220'; Sec. 27, T1N R8E Section 27 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? 103-20-018A8 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? Better utilize the land. (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number pz,_ a -�� b Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed (� l �c•`l ��( Application Received by. Receipt No. b Fee Amount 3 Q l) Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non—refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be -^ requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed John Gargrave as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of .th s p plc.`. ? rm.) (1) william L. and Betty E. Osborn Print Owner's Name) �Si nature 1710 E. 20th Ave.,A.J. 982-32749 (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) Apache Jct., Az. 85219 (City, State, Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF -2 k-C-ON.1 k) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged beAore SS. Inc this 6th day of June 19 COUNTY OFC2.1_P__Aj __,_) by: William L. OsiDOrri and•BettY. F. C1chntn My Commission Expires 3I`I-IgCkANC'1 /�a`A).. )'l�0 AV PIC 10 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all corn spondence In this matter be mailed to me at their req st. !. John Gargrave (Print representative's name) (Signature of representdt1ve) 2 011 W. Stiperctitinn 9R2-4 92 (Mailfng address) (Phone number) Apache Jct, Az. 85220 (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before COUNTY Or-"Pt iJ -(_- ) SS me this C mar of` i 19q(., . My Casmission Expires.�l S; i5z1 (AA 7, ) �, IOTAAY PUBLIC Page 2 of 2 Owttlr ORDINANCE NO. 521 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-27-85 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as• The South § of the Southwest 1 of the Northwest 1 of the Southwest 1 of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian; EXCEPT the West 220 feet (220') thereof be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-3 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone subject to the following stipulation the applicants dedicate the North and South thirty-three feet (33') of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion therof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / /f )-11)( 7- ,, ,, ....... .4/( 3dzysilji, ' , ITEM #____, MEETING OF :417/ - D , MOTION BY: Cr SECONDED BY: *112 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER J ,., COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO I VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL 1 MAYOR HILL J 1 ; UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL n ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET i • NOTES L I .... i/(49/ Pe (?' A, i ( 61 1 ITEM # MEETING OP MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : 0 YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL Vc COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER / COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ V COUNCILMAN BALJO V MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 6 ITEM NO. 4 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 521, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 521, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 521, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 521, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 525, PZ-24-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6. IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE PQACHt ✓� G J �f,i: . 0 z li �r 9R,ZpNP cO'ity o C4pache 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Agenda Approved by "' .- August 25, 1986 Date Item Consent Agenda Public Hea,ing 9/ 5 MEMORANDUM TO- THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Old Business r THROUGH. KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER New Business Postponed Item THROUGH: '\, CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: -JOJULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-24-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 525) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Robert G. Casazza REPRESENTATIVE: Ione Chovanec LOCATION: Southeast corner of N. Meridian Dr. and W. Lost Dutchman Blvd. CURRENT ZONING: General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING: Local Commercial District C-2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Local Commercial '� COMBINED GROSS ACREAGE: 5 acres COMBINED NET ACREAGE: 3.92 acres CURRENT LAND USE: vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - vacant South - vacant East - vacant West - vacant SURROUNDING ZONING: North - Mobile Home Park (MHP) and General Business Zone (CB-2) Pinal County) South - General Rural GR East - proposed Multiple Family Residence Zone by Planned Development CR-5/PD West - Rural - 43 (Maricopa County) SITE CHARACTERISTICS generally flat topography with a couple of minor washes 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor rnd City Council - PZ-24-86 - Agoacla Item Sept. 2, 1986 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff notes the request would comply with the General Plan designation for the site. A neighborhood commercial usage at this location would be compatible with surrounding uses provided development is well planned and constructed. .. It should be noted that the C-2 zoning classification does allow conventional residential uses on 15,000 square foot lots. The subject site is a large site and it is possible that this site may be broken into several smaller pieces and developed without a common theme. Lack of shared parking, land- scaping and retention facilities could be a real detriment to quality development of this parcel and would increase development as well . Staff concurs with the Planning and Zoning Commission in recommending approval of a site plan prior to commencement of construction. The subject site is located at the intersection of two arterials and is also a city entrance. It is anticipated that Lost Dutchman Boulevard (Brown Road) will become a major thoroughfare with construction of the new freeways and residential development along Brown Road just west of our city limits. Qualtiy is the critical issue for development of this site as a city entrance. The construction of Acoma Estates to the south and the proposed subdivision to the east along with quality development of this site will set the tone for future development in this area and may well be the turning point to per- manent quality development in this area of the community. Staff would recommend approval stipulating: 1) the dedication of the North fifty feet (50' ) and the West fifty feet (50' ) of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at the intersection of North Meridian and West Lost �• Dutchman Boulevard. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, voted to adopt the following motion: (M/S Conway/ Vanhoy 5-0-0) . " I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-24-86, an application of Robert G. Casazza for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District. The Honorable Mayor ^I City Council - PZ-24-86 - Age" Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Three Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1. That we have a site development plan at the time of development. 2. The applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50' ) and the West fifty feet (50' ) of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at the intersection of N. Meridian and W. Lost Dutchman Boulevard. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. It is in compliance with the General Plan. 2. It is in the highest and best use of the property." STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE The applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50' ) and the West fifty feet (50' ) of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at the intersection of N. Meridian and W. Lost Dutchman Boulevard. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation for a site plan is not in the ordinance and will require City Council amendment of the ordinance at time of adoption to include this stipulation if the Council so desires. You will also need to specify who will approve the site plan. IOW Oat& PZ-24-86 GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL I 1 Pinal County I Am. • l MHP 1 I I BLM : 1 _. -- — — - - _ _ — _ � � 1 I — State land lleased 1 equipment it _� Pinal County 1 storage ;r I CB-2 1 yard M°'I° I 1 1 W. Lost- Dutchman Blvd. Ia I I SFH vacant ► It, I Proposed I � 1 CR-5/PD vacant ,,, A, vacant 1 I ! GR 1 vacant I ,1 I Horse 1I� vacant - o ""' • I H. k _ - W. Wi ndson St. -- —_ kit 1 i I I� o stable .., o 1,.' 1 Acoma Estates CR-5 vacant a r � r t ,,i . , fir---n 1 1 �,, I 1 TH1i .i . I L 1 ii., .st II I 1 1 ____, _ .,_:_. ___ __ ____, i , __ _,. Lerwr tll St. ., , 70 SUBJECT SITE I ; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) L__.I Scale: f I i1 0 300 600 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From eWeKAL RatfftL. To C 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for/ LDer41- 0,0P01 I1C4L✓ 3. Size of your property: (4.$) acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? /49e K T 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North VACANT South //,4c14JYT East 1/A(?4u7" West l//4C4/YT 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: LOT' Z, /N SAC • /8iTIN , R ' E Section !g , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Final County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? /90 03 — e o q- 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? 7-0 ,e 5 L.L p 7 2p R/ y !w fir9/4Nem L Lc TG (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number 7 Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed - ek — Application Received by: Receipt No. f")7 7 c Fee Amount S C) •<v Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed .zp/Ve E. CtieeANE=C as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of his app cation form.) (1) ' eRT CA,SIlzzf} l� • Print Owner's Name tur a.o4>,v,cLe Aye , Ma ing Address one umber (City. State, Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) �..� (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) 4J STATE OF e/1 L//4 Af/4 ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before SS me this i slay of ,.J('n t OFFICIAL SEAL COUNTY OF/Q_5A1 E-1-&3 by .a.,%!ZT CL gilibla76. PATTI OETTERICti ' ��• ,. y� NOTARY PUBUC CAUFC r1�} �tt LOS ANGELES COUW My Commission Expires /CYl(,,�67 �( t-c,t if t/�J �''" My Coon.ExQ,••Oct ter. eTAR1 'UBl1C --�w� --a--�` 10 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at their req st. l Zo/Y� E• 6/iey1#NP_c � � (Print representative s name) gnature o representative) MO w cR orl .2-06�z (Mail ing addre one nunber) lie rJNe rJoN f_ z, ity, tate, ip o e STATE OF,I'/,TON,' ) The forego g. instrument wa�,acknowledged before 5S me this g day 9f • J.,: 3-r , 19 k(, COUNTY OF%V/KAL ) by 7 �. A—'/ / i . i --- My Commission Expires: ;Jill Loriimis,i�O i xpires 5epr Z9,2'98 NOTARY PLBL IC Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 525 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTkiCT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-24-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as Lot 6 in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District subject to the following stipulation the applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50') and the West fifty feet (50') of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at the intersection of North Meridian and West Lost Dutchman Boulevard SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1, 1 v)‘ 1 qH,P0 ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 0&/*/ SECONDED BY Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL .. ... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES QX 7/ nl 0" CV .... i P iT .e)frc ;if, liyA )10 „, , ,, . ,3, t/ vo 0 -Ipiger -. 0, \id'v ,,,)k) 0,e 4 ,/ ei s-67 ITEM # ,J MEETING OF V 00 Or MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: - YES NO ABSTAINED . VgatAlefigArAziittgeg) , i COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ i,✓ MAYOR HILL UNANI"^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL i4 ITEM NO. 5 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 525, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 525, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 525, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 525, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 526, PZ-25-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3 . WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE psACHE✓G 6( +0 -ti4''',l, _.\'fy. '9R/ZONP' (Oily o C4pache cOunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT e/�7 Agenda Approved by / `-/ Date Itei"` August 26, 1986 Consent Agenda ___�__ _ Public Hearing %94 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL doLiOld Business THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER t' New Business FROM: 1 CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Postponed Item PREPAREI : (jJIM NAKAGAWA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT.IIIPF AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PUBLIC HEARING PZ-25-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 526) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This is a rezoning request by James Payton through Alan Gillespie from General Rural (GR) to Single Family Residence - Mobile Home (CR-2 MH) for a parcel on the west side of Cactus Road, 200 feet north of 4th Avenue. The site is designated on the General Plan as Medium/High Density Residential Opportunity and it is fairly level with a wash trending southwest through the parcel . Originally, the applicant had sought the rezoning of 3.3 acres. However, the rezoning area has been delimited to 2.08 acres currently developed with a long woodsided house with a trailer. The net area would be 1 .85 acres. Surrounding uses are: North - electrical substation ( GR) South - mobile homes (TH) East - vacant (TH) West - vacant (GR) PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS This rezoning would be consistent with the General Plan designation and staff would recommend approval of the request. Seven lots of 11 ,000 square feet could be created from this site eventually. At the P & Z Commission hearing, the applicant revealed that he had no plans to redivide the northerly 1 .25 acre portion where he currently lives. A number of Commissioners began to question him about the wisdom of rezoning the northern part and the applicant requested to exclude that part out in order for his portion not to become an issue with the remainder of the site. The City could not, then, require him to dedicate right-of-way for Second Avenue and Cactus Road for that northern portion. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM - SEPT. ^1986 PZ-25-86 (ORD. 526) PAGE TWO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, adopted the following motion (M/S Davies/Vanhoy 3-2-0 with Conway and Callahan dissenting) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-25-86, an application of James Payton for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence - Mobile Home Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . We will rezone to CR-2 (MH) as outlined in Exhibit A, excluding Parcel A. 2. The applicant will dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 3. Parcel A shall be adjusted to represent a gross 14 acres. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It complies with the General Plan designation for the site. 2. It is compatible with surrounding property uses. STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE The applicant dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. .� JAN:CRN.KC.jo PZ_25 86=(PAYTON) _..UIiIII` 0 100 200_ 400: NI REZQNINGIFROM GENERAL_RURAL_(GR) / t 1 L TO-SINGLE=FAMILY RESIDEKCE:-- MOBILE=HOME_(CR=2:(MH)) FEET` Junction Street rib IIIIIMIIMIlli IMMIINI glinsmaili ! ^k, GR_ I: 0 0 1 1 0 Al SRP R_ ` TH._ U Electr-ic:Sub-- station- I Second_Avenue,"..... .....--.....mulm I p'. ..,F - 1 03- TH 12_ is cu- GR I _ s. CJ- Subject- k N- _ site.: V ' Q �_. �- 11- CJ- -0- 1 bi z VAC- U jI ' VAC: ED r s . 1 ,.. * r n jJ L.1 s,... ...NI.s i..i EL...T - 1 TH- 0 : , _ - TH- 13 TH- cFP / M •... omm. Palms MHP — GR l White Sands- - � I , IED TH/PD Est 23 tes- MHP TH Superstition L-0ok6ut I I RVP APN 101-22-- Auk l. 33o,oo'GR-6SS .•. IR 1 .?3®X 140+1.0e-x4o 54i 6osF.' l�S�G� B Fr= A o�Sa' f�C- O 4 O l O ® I. i ft 19°.4'4.--4-aa- > r /mod®®' rt., 6 t Sa, .300.0o4N114Ao1 E%, S. -, A/1V.y�. Skki,, Sec. -/ 7 l,y R9L.---j G r S R 8. fB 7N�R� p O EuCe Pr N.6-o,l� O IE/CePrE.33'rNe2 6 0- _ ,,.. c.n o el k n v V 4 .297' 3. v \, i N FouR7 / Ave- -r RECEIVED AUG 2 5 1986 1 • DEPT OF PLANNING t 4 11 WEAVER'S NEEDLE TRAVEL TRAILER RESORT July 8, 1986 Planning and Zoning Commission CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85220 RE: PZ-25-86 (Proposed Rezoning Petition) Dear Sirs: I will be unable to personally attend the public hearing to be held on Tuesday, July 22, 1986. I am, therefore, writing to ask you to disapprove the applica- tion submitted by James Payton, as represented by Alan Gillespie, to consider the rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. We have nothing against Mr. Payton, personally, but rather are submitting our objection to the rezoning petition itself. Currently, Apache Junction has too many travel trailer and mobile home park spaces available. In the past three years, there are more spaces available than there are customers to fill them. Businessmen are hurting and have been "hanging on by a shoestring" for the past three years. By approving additional sites at this time, you are putting the present travel trailer and mobile home parks in jeopardy. Additionally, the citizens of Apache Junction enjoy Apache Junction for its rural environment. To increase the density at this time would be to destroy the natural beauty and environment. We appreciate your serious consideration to our appeal not to approve the rezoning. Very sincerely, WEAVE 'S NEEDLE TRAV4 TRAILER RESORT ' ll ' \ i UL -U . l ��, Calvin M. Leung Owner CML:bjl 250 S TOMAHAWK ROAD, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 TEL (602) 982-3683 t C , CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change ofzoning classification from Parcel No 1 From l;r'nrrd Ito To: /if No 2 No. 3 No 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? 3 Size of your property: /1/760D--5, [acres] [square feet] 4 What is built on your property now? A hr .c , trpi e7r 5re -fir,-ller- 5 What has been built on the property next to yours? North f�ljiQ,r South /6 //o17r�rr0�/ East. arre/frr 4,-77 7,-.(s7--<14 ,2-7< West: ✓ 6 Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned rote1504 ,t J'-AI 03-1011.1,1-tt Slr[a9 At'e10 !0rl'n,c 1C .w!` fe[00C 15� xtii u•a a�}. �,ou r 0 t`l 7(1rN 7 St r tk!- r4 1 C',5 VP•� p'e 0i r.! �1 u.:1e w nr Al ISM 'I ciily "'Le.00c tsi6 e.t�—•— •j.ab•Y aSF ri II i[71 t►�[3 33 A: 0, E. .0 Section , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 7. What is your Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? /J/- 2--^/ -2/'2' 8 Why are you requesting this rezoning? T ru er nil `c ,mom (Please complete reverse side of form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No. Fa _ Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed Co [ L"t S3 (p Appl ication received by• A Receipt No o r Fee Amount Page 1 of 2 11/20/84 1 Page Two of Two 9 I/We do hereby certify that: a (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truth- fully completed this application for rezoning. c I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve or disapprove our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes e I/We being the qlpers of the pry rty in. his rezoning application have appointed //,t.ff„,/v G/ _'--' as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning cohsidered favorably by the City of Apache Junction. (Representative is to complete #10 ) (1) '/ NTOm S / Y C (Print Owner's Name, / (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) p/ ?LkP �wu�� m .r f-C -) (City, State, Zip Cade (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF ,f'/70N& ) The foregoing instrument wa acknowledged bore ILA ) SS. me this (J 1 da of (iL0 , 19 COUNTY OF ��/vI ) by �a;�r�ta j 1. • My Commission Expires mVCom,ms•i09 FXp.es FiO cb te, insy/ ' /��f NOTARY PUBLI 10 I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all corres ondence in?-7 this matter be mailed to me at their request /y/,1// Ci s ,//'. / //-2.7 (Print representative's natfie -j"SignaIi.we-6 re resentative)� (NfaiJ40,g address) j (P(ione numoer) (City, State. Zip/Cod( STATE OF -4 J70N4 ) C2 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before SS me this /G " day nor , '. t v f , 19 -, MY Commission Expires _ F 'u, -:va s' VI� /,/50l' OIS ORDINANCE NO 526 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as. South 300 feet of the North 440 feet of the East of the Southeast * of the Northwest * of the Southeast * of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, except the North 60 feet of the West 140 feet thereof be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone, subject to the following stipulation that the applicant dedicate the East thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F. Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ( 1(j) . /tk ki>rolp ITEM # (I) MEETING OF l' 0-1j MOTION BY SECONDED BY; nki YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER J MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL J ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES dtt (?)14.kiij ITEM # MEET I NG OF C MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ \/ �DF�FA1� COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL J COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANI"OLS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 6 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 526, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance.) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 526, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 526, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 526, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: _ ... PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 527, PZ-28-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE (1.—HP.CHE ✓G It., wiz !f .r_ Jac 'IPizoNP Zt a C pache &unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /� August 22, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER THROUGH: ;`r , CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: ''JULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-28-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 527) BACKGROUND APPLICANT• Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, not personally, but as Trustee of the Marie Arnold Trust REPRESENTATIVE: Ruth Armsby LOCATION. Between East 17th Avenue and East 18th Avenue on Wickiup Road CURRENT ZONING. General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING• General Commercial District C-3 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION• Medium/High Residential GROSS ACREAGE: 1 .25 acres NET ACREAGE. .8 acre CURRENT LAND USE. one mobile home and one single family house SURROUNDING LAND USE. North - vacant South - vacant East - Apache Propane West - single family home SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Rural GR South - General Rural GR East - General Business CB-2 West - General Rural GR Agenda Approved by SITE CHARACTERISTICS: unremarkable Date Item a Consent Agenda �y Public Hearing i / Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND C,LZ.Y COUNCIL �. SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 AG JA ITEM PZ-28-86 PAGE THREE The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . It does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. 2. It does not have direct access to U.S. 60 and could place a burden on the undeveloped dirt roads. 3. It would set a precedent in an area of residential parcels and .�. developed trailer parks. Motion passed 5-0-0. STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE Applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33' ), the South thirty-three feet (33' ) , and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs at intersections. Additionally, staff would recommend the stipulation of site plan approval prior to commencement of construction. JAR.CRN:KC:jo p HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 AGENDTEM A-. PZ-28-86 PAGE TWO PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff notes this request does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. Commercial development along Highway 60 is predicated on direct access to the Highway, this site does not have direct access. While the developer would be required to install offsite improvements, the Wickiup turn-off would not be paved and approximately 100 feet of roadway between Highway 60 and the subject site would not be paved. The site would have to provide adequate turn arounds required by many uses in the General Commercial District (C-3) . This would place this burden on undeveloped local dirt roads. Prior to filing an application, the applicant' s representative and staff discussed the different zoning classifications to determine the most appropriate classification for the site. Staff advised against a General Commercial District (C-3) classification and felt that any commercial classification was questionable. Adjoining property to the north will probably be developed as a commercial site. Property to the east has already been developed as a commercial site. The properties to the west would probably feel justified in requesting commercial zoning if this use were approved. The property to the south and southeast would remain residential under our current General Plan. As the current property owner is rezoning the subject site for the purpose of selling, no indication of the proposed use is available. Staff would recommend denial of the rezoning request. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the North thirty- three feet (33' ) , the South thirty-three feet (33' ) and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes .�. along with twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs at intersections. Additionally, staff would recommend the stipulation of site plan approval prior to commencement of construction. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regulat meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, voted to adopt the following motion (M/S Davies/Conway) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-28-86, an application of Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, not personally, but as Trustee of the Marie Arnold Trust, Alan W. Kral , Trust Officer, for her property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. PZ-28-86 ç GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT E. 16th Ave. N N VACA. T I ,... N\ C- N. VACANT N I y)9h4'd N N E. 17th Ave. Ny 6 N O NI V \ MH SFH I \N I CB-2 N N /S.212 / I APACHE PROPANE N N E. 18th Ave. —1— II N I WICKIUP VACANT • I MHP I I `n TH I I C-4 Icm o cI( c I I inY U 0 cc; I- 19th Ave. 3 I JfI I . I- Iv' I I I I I I i I I I E. 20th Ave. L- - _ __ ___ I_ _____ — ____ —I (//l SUBJECT SITE I 1 LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) L__J { f 1 I Scale: 0 200 400 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: (-G� . Parcel No. 1 From 64/2 To // vt 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? 3. Size of your property: /// [`r-acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? .,5/2.41[ " as /n v,B/ m E 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North l' R C A fur South U fl c f, A.I T" East Ae tFE72opFlit' F West M oP LE Nom ES 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: - / toc ' of s14 F W '/4 W ct o ec-rro 2 - /N S R. d- r (. Section c L 7 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? / 0.3 -4 O - 007 ,3 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? ?r o P e r-T Y / S i A) A -f r k S 1" N Piv)rAISO2 SAID 1-1-1 E P6ST N D }-} ' GNES 7' ttS a-) e )41 s eRrofer ry ik1ou. 6 e -t- o P QOmMere. / A 4 RA oSe A?4x"h' OfCJ(, / RE aGSR Pe -His p ,t- zo , iu w� Q so 'A &v m A �ec6 r —i-�}� Y. (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number PI- ,c6 Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed (= ?1- 1'(.; Application Received by: Receipt No. C7 ? Fee Amount 1v Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 9. I/We do hereby cel. L-y that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We bein he owns s of the property in this rezoning application have appointed �(T,q /q/D47/,-5/7i /' as our repr e tative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do ny hing necessa y to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of pache Junc o Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of t s plicat fo ) ontinental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chica o, of personally, but ad111'ru t@ e 99f the Marie Arnold Trust BY (Print Ownerrs Hate) tun A an W. ra , Trust Officer 30 N. LaSalle Street 312 828-5961 (Hailing Address) r Chicagfio, Ii 60697 (City, State.,Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Haze) (Signature) (� (Meiling Address) (Phone }Weber) (City, State. Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Hare) (Signature) • (Mailing Address) (Phone Humber) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) C.(nor'; gaze) (Signature (Mailing Address) . • e ' •'•er • •,,?�, ' ♦ .'�• ', (City, State, Zip Code) • • ; NW:: ?'� , ,. — STATE The for g�nsts s acknowledged to •+:-a•`A,,.L Q..,.�•. ;�, = ss. .e *If instils*m "lei c, of , 19•� a O COUITI OF by: G, .f1, /`Fff Sy � . Comaisston Expires: ( /pf f � `•..,.,,v 1\ ''' •r: t. ' AB. 10. I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this cc""",, rezoning application as their repro untattve and that all correspondence in this tatter be sailed to ax at their recces . rqk(I)�h t� 7 (Print r resentat vefs ) i ire of representative) Mailing`idde s) (Phone/ a ( V(f — /Q 0 rU nuaber) ity, tate, p e STATE fore��y fn nstrwent Igo acknowledged before Collin " ' ` /4',"Li.A P ;k 12 daY f ` ll 19 . L My C !,,s> cP;Yes: a ,r ^at•ur- g.--*-7747 ,ie 19 1990 OTART PUBLIC Pa .o.' 2 411!TMEr fr ORDINANCE NO 527 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN R�PZ-28-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as- the East 165 feet of the South of the Northeast 4 of the Northwest I of the Southwest 3 of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District, subject to the following stipulations 1) applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33'), the South thirty-three feet (33'), and the East thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoffs at intersections, and 2) the approval of site plan approval prior to commencement of construction. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTIgaik ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F. Alexander City Attorney PQACHF✓G h e 0 O.• z '9P/ZOWk amity o @419ache &unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM 64uCHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-28-86 - REQUEST FOR CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING I have reevaluated our position on this case. There is information and analysis which was not presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing, which I believe warrants a staff recommendation for C-2 zoning for the subject site and may have had an influence on their decision. In addition, the applicant has not returned the required quit-claim deeds for roadway dedications, which necessitates a continuation of the Council 's hearing. Therefore, I would recommend the Council continue the public hearing on this case until September 16, and direct the Planning and Zoning Commission to re- hear the case at their September 9th meeting. ... If you feel another Planning and Zoning Commission hearing is not warranted, I will present our revised staff recommendation directly to the City Council at the September 16 meeting. CRN:JI 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 r r ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET tfr) NOTES I � ' y' ... 1/ ,(,;i, Xo k'Vl , ,, ,v,i1J vi ,;:i - ) Ill 1 \ 0.7 ( 41 # V Yd 9 t ITEM /-14___ MEETING OF v MOTION BY ; # A AV SECONDED BY; IrVIAA. 7 NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER / . COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ I COUNCILMAN BALJO I VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ii MAYOR HILL V i , UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON p COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL UNANI"",OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL a ITEM NO. 7 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 527, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 527, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 527, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED. ) OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 527, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 528. PZ-30-86 2 . WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE, AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE (--„sikcHE,--- ti Y. i= 'IR,zONP ` ity o cpache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /mf August 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL) THROUGH- KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGERI✓` THROUGH: CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: �'feJULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-30-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 528) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Albert and Judith Folsom and Daniel and Carolyn Rafferty REPRESENTATIVE: Daniel Rafferty LOCATION: on S. Royal Palm Road approximately 330 feet south of Southern Avenue CURRENT ZONING: General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING: Single Family Residence CR-2 (MH) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Residential NO. OF PARCELS. Two COMBINED GROSS ACREAGE: 21 acres COMBINED NET ACREAGE: 1.98 acres CURRENT LAND USE: South parcel - vacant North parcel - block structure/shed SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - mobile homes South - mobile home East - vacant West - mobile home SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Rural GR South - General Rural GR East - General Rural GR Agenda Approved by West - General Rural GR Date item # SITE CHARACTERISTICS. unremarkable Consent Agenda (7 Public Hearing ' ,' Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor'^id City Council - PZ-30-86 - Ac la Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Through changes in ownership, four lots of 11,000 square feet could be created from the North 14 acre parcel and three lots of 11,000 square feet could be created from the South 14 acre parcel . Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site. Although the General Plan designation for the site is residential and the density is correct, and although there are RV and mobile home parks in the vicinity, staff does not feel it is in the best interest of the community to have small individual mobile home lots in this area. Properties north of Southern Avenue used conventional construction methods with a combination of duplexes, four plexes, and single family homes. Other property in the vicinity east of this site is either undeveloped or developed by conventional construction methods. Development of this site should either be by conventional housing methods (single or multi-family structures) or as a mobile home/RV park or subdivision. As a mobile home/RV park would require a minimum of ten acres, this could not be accomplished unless combined with surrounding properties. Properties in this neighborhood are 1; acre with one mobile home. A rezoning of this nature would be considered spot zoning and would set a precedent for the neighborhood. Should this occur, adjacent properties would probably follow suit. Several of these adjacent properties abut Southern Avenue and with the prevailing use of private drives for access to small lots this could complicate normal vehicular traffic, school pedestrian traffic, and school bus traffic. It is anticipated that increases in traffic in this area due to construction of the new freeway within 3-5 years will occur. Staff, therefore, would recommend denial of the rezoning request. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the East forty feet (40' ) of Parcel One and the East forty feet (40' ) and the South thirty- three feet (33' ) of Parcel Two for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at the intersection of Royal Palm and West 26th Avenue. PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commision at their regular meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, voted to adopt the following motion: (M/S Conway/Callahan 5-0-0) . "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-30-86, an application of Albert and Judith Folsom, and Daniel and Carolyn Rafferty for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning of Parcel No. One from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone and of Parcel No. Two from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. The Honorable Mayor 'Ink' City Council - PZ-30-86 - Agee Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Three The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. It will set a spot zoning precedent. 2. It is not in the best interest of the City. 3. With the increase of traffic, we don 't need it right there in that area. " STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE The applicants dedicate the East forty feet (40' ) of Parcel One and the East forty feet (40' ) and the South thirty-three feet (33' ) of Parcel Two for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at the intersection of Royal Palm and West 26th Avenue. JAR:CRN:j1 PZ-30-86 GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2(MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE Southern Avenue MH CORRAL/SHED TT AS VACANT 2nd RESIDENCE VACANT / 11 E.26th Avenue MH MH MH MH -0 0 cr VACANT , g_ TWIN PALMS ` a I 0 RV Park I N � I i I 7 SUBJECT SITE i— LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) 1 `1 L f � Scale: 0 200 400 .•, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Gt� f�Z: � , Parcel No. 1 From �i��iCL(ZA L U V L'cL,To 2 A C=1`(t=fa C_ 2 iJ Q..A4 L Fern-y--C — - 3 �r _ - Z 4 .r. 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? 3. Size of your property: c2? off' ///44 / - acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? 5. What has been built on� / the property next to yours? ii �� North �.C) t3 t L E 1- 0(vi t; South IAC) ? i t_ ( to Cc .C7.7 East Q't>CC F -L-✓vi West 61'1oP, t L k�nt44, 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: 1.I % S 1=7 1,1 N IN) L % INI Uu S . 3 $ �/Z Se % NC %1. NE '4 N (,t1 (/g 33 C Section 3.3 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? 102.- 2-i -Apse 1- 008)137 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? (O C Oil& ii/IC) ' i c j Th . (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number 12 -.-.. 46 Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed '7- / - S'6 Application Received by: c,_ Receipt No. ( ' c}/ Fee Amount r 3T CC Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 . 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other C documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process ' to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being sthe ownArs of the property in this rezoning application have appointed i).A N K\l F T\/ as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of this application for ) (1) ALIRSZQ v FO l.`�o iti1 a� assjk (Print Owner's Name) ignatur (Mailing ddress Phone Number) R-2.. a Z_ City. State, p Code) • (Print Owner's Name ig ature r IO . uL�c� l e 98 - (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) City. State, Zip ode) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF f7'/Zd 117) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before COUNTY OF---Pe Nfyt ) SS. meby this ,�G day of �'� �_ , 19 4 /' My Commission Expires: �-.,1O — c /J/tom'c.•L� ti Y PUBLIC 7 10 1 hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all grrspondenc this matter be v„ led to me at their st. \` DAN(c-i- riot represe stove s name S gnatur o repr e tative fling ddress h ne nunber Z. �-ZZU ity, State, ip o e STATE OF /Zevv7) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ) SS. me this . day of �yu , 19 k COUNTY OF ,/Z'/}Z ) by My Comnnssion Expires: C�� . wv� .( 11_C%,tip /NOTARY PUBLIC (7 Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 528 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-30-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. 00.14, SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as- the North z of the Southeast ; of the Northeast ; of the Northeast of the Northwest i in Section 33, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; and the South i of the Southeast i of the Northeast i of the Northeast i of the Northwest i in Section 33, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) subject to the following stipulation the applicants dedicate the East forty feet (40') of Parcel One and the East forty feet (40') and the South thirty-three feet (33') of Parcel Two for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at the intersection of Royal Palm and West 26th Avenue SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney A. A. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES e)_, \ ie ... /1) . 4 1a ITEM ##__L____ MEETING Vkil''''\ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL i . COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER ✓ COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ ✓ � I MAYOR HILL 1 UNANI^^ US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES i 1 'Yu giv ((C ITEM # ( j MEETING OF C � � MOTION BY: 7 SECONDED BY: �c YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ +/ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL r/ UNANI"1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0,) V1( 1 y /ro, •')\' ITEM # ,,, 6 \ MEETING OF 4 ' MOTION BY: 1 y SECONDED BY: 4,0 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET/ NOTES 4%tt / \ c/ D � , ITEM # i M EE1`IKGO Iv v MOTION BY: -e\.( )b SECONDED BY: ^I 61 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO _ VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON /✓ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER v COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ VehasAbiftkurstutabl MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL J .r. ITEM NO. 8 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 528, BE Step 1 READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 528, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 528, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 528, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 529, PZ-31-86 'm' 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3 . WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE A p, 1,0 .,?.... 0 U i .i ;%:-Y,►' z \\,, _, "IPIZONP c6ity o puce 0 unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER 4 v C)iTHROUGH: CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: 'JULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-31-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 529) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Virginia Wilson LOCATION: south side of West Shiprock midway between N. Main Drive and N. Ironwood Drive CURRENT ZONING. General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING• Single Family Residence CR-2 (MH) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium/High Residential Opportunity GROSS ACREAGE: 1.36 acres NET ACREAGE: 1.23 acres CURRENT LAND USE: One mobile home and one ramada SURROUNDING LAND USE. North - single family home South - mobile home East - Ironwood Mobile Home Park West - mobile home and sheds SURROUNDING ZONING• North - General Rural GR South - Trailer Homesite TH East - Trailer Homesite TH �/ West - Trailer Homesite TH Agenda Approved by SITE CHARACTERISTICS. unremarkable Date Item I Consent Agenda _,,_ Public Hearing %Z�& _ Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor'"`id City Council - PZ-31-86 - Agla Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Through changes in ownership, four lots of 11,000 square feet could be created from the 1.36 acre parcel . Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site and is compatible with surrounding land uses. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the North thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, adopted the following motion• (M/S Conway/Davies 4-1-0 with Mr. Vehon dissenting) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-31-86, an application of Virginia Wilson for her property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone, The reason for this recommendation is. 1. I cannot feel comfortable with private access roads. " STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE The applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. JAR.CRN.j1 PZ-31-86 GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2(MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C W. Tepee f-- - -—-1 � I I I I TH• 1 I Vacant I I I I MH SFH I I Vacant I I I I I W. Shiprock -- - - _ __ --�� i -- -- _ - _ - - - MH MH I I I Q ' I Ironwood MHP Ti o I I I 1 0 > i Vac. Sheds I I o r I L L. Vac. Vac. TH I -- z:, ci fol MH MH TH MH I I r I MH i MH I I - - -- I -- - -- - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - - -F W. Roundup St. ESUBJECT SITE LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) Scale: 0 200 400 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From General Rural To CR-3 ("'') 2 'I'H CR-3 WH) 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for' "Pd�ism / Hl g Density O12vortunity 3. Size of your property: 1.35 [x] acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now7 anuf;irt,ired TInmo 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North Home South ;.'nnufartured Hnme East Travel Trailer Park West Vanufactured Home 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: Parcel # 1. E0 'aSWaNEaSEa Parcel # 2. East Fifteen (15) feet of A NE±SWkNE= SE1 Section 18 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? 100-35-013D Amok8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? This large a parcel is difficult to maintain, The area is not suitable to keep horses due to the proximity and density of the neighbors. The property would be better utilized as CR-3 (NH) and would be more marketable. (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number P2- 31 -4 Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed - YE, Application Received by: Jf Receipt No. ('% 2 3 Fee Amount 4,-2.7C .C-Z% Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (i ) the owned of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other (7 documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have 'truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of this application form.) (I) Virginia Wilson �( f3i 11,ll. !` ' � � '\ (Print Owner's Name) ( ZSignature) 1835 W. Shiprock St. 983_1515 (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) Apace Junction, AZ. 85220 (City, State, Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State. Zip Code) STATE OF //6/ '7-' ) The foregoing. instrument was acknowledged before ) SS me this .3/, day of t7r(n.'e COUNTY OF 1/Olio to,SEAL by I ,, f4 j�.c::pi �, My C HAR9 Q� , ENGLIN 4Y / 4 z °`�1bP' [�n' NUTARUBIlC Mq.0 ,,q eta tCt� �I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this !' m tie b.a6.4984epresentative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at their request. (Print representative's name) (Signature of-representative) (Mailing address) (Phone number) (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before COUNTY OF ) SS me this day of , 19 by My Commission Expires _ NOTARY PUBLIC Page 2 of 2 004N ^ was ORDINANCE NO. 529 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE P2-31-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as Parcel No 1 The East of the Northeast 3 of the Southwest < of the Southeast 3 in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; and Parcel 2 The East fifteen feet (15') of the West z of the Northeast of the Southwest of the Northeast I of the Southeast / in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone subject to the following stipulation The applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 . Norman S Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F. Alexander City Attorney 9 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES vo'cr\ t4Y. (1'1 \ : / tV 1' C� V ITEM # MEETING �- BY : SECONDED F E- J\NLIA I" MOTION BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO . VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ,C COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER 7 I ..MAYOR HILL UNANI"^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL I') ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET • NOTES vi\V\ r , /)\ ()(. 1\ Cs\ V ITEM # MEETING OF,6143/ c, „- ctiW MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES : NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER r COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANITOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 c ^J )k99) cti P/C' 4 ITEM # I MEET I NG OF ' v MOTION BY : 61. SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON i/ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ 0 COUNCILMAN BALJO i1 VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL / MAYOR HILL / 1 UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED , TOTAL a ITEM NO. 9 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 529, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 529, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 529, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 529, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDIANCE NO. 531 , TRAFFIC CONTROL 2 • WILL THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE PQp,CHf✓ r ,__ ,,,,„,,,:,,r.>-'' _ 0 U 7.�, -1 j 1,04 Z - _* "lPIZONP COiti 4 &4pache 09unction AUGUST 27, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND //MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGERI.V k)— FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ? V ---2( ,,,--' RE: TRAFFIC CONTROL ORDINANCE NO. 531 (AGENDA ITEM SEPTEMBER 2, 1986) Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Goldfield Road Intersection Prompted by Pinal County to remove stop signs at Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Goldfield Road, research was performed and it was determined that the Eastbound and Westbound stop signs on Lost Dutchman Boulevard were in place prior to the formal adoption of Ordinance 378. This Ordinance was prepared in conjunction with the Citys road improvement program at the time, and the formal adoption of many pre—existing signs. Traffic counts .0 . this spring indicate larger traffic volumes on Lost Dutchman Boulevard as compared to Goldfield Road, and as such should be inconvenienced the least. San Marcos Drive and 12th Avenue The Department of Public Safety feels that the removal of Northbound and Southbound stop signs on San Marcos Drive at 12th Avenue would enhance traffic flow and safety. In as much as the spring traffic volume shows approximately 1500+ vehicles a day on San Marcos Drive and as there will be a temporary increase of traffic on San Marcos Drive due to its being y construction detour, the request appears reasonable. Agenda Approved by %--0._.--' Date Item # ,_._.. Consent Agenda _----- Public Hearing '2/' z Old Business RWB:th New Business File # 309.013 —_____ Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Adak ORDINANCE NO. 531 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; REPEALING THE DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN LOCATIONS FOR STOP SIGNS INSTALLATIONS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, Aommik AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL In the public interest to insure safe, effective and efficient traffic flow along public rights-of-way within the City of Apache Junction, re-evaluation has been made and it has been determined that repealing the designation of the following locations for stop sign installations may enhance traffic flow Westbound on Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Goldfield Road, Eastbound on Lost Dutchman Boulevard at Goldfield Road, Northbound on San Marcos Drive at 12th Avenue, Southbound on San Marcos Drive at 12th Avenue Furthermore, the Director of Public Works is empowered and directed to initiate appropriate action to remove said traffic control devices SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 'oak SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of any violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required by Chapter 12 of this code constitutes a civil traffic violation Civil traffic violations are subject to the provisions of Title 28, Chapter 6, Article 20 and 21, Arizona Revised Statute, and amendments thereof. SECTION V EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1986 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 1986. NORMAN S HILL Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 531 PAGE TWO ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F. Alexander City Attorney I ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Ke)id ,() - v ITEM # MEETING 01. icr MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ 0( COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SKEET NOTES U n ` ii)( ..... )jh \x‘j LI ITEM #/ C6 ID MEETING OF • CH 1;). MOT I ON BY. SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL I COUNCILMAN EIDSON I COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ I COUNCILMAN BALJO 7 MAYOR HILL ‘/ UNANII US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 10 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 531, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) a.. ep 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 531, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 531, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 531, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: A. PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 532, PZ-29-86 "` 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE _ PQACH6.TT % O� U . 1. 4o. z _,--_,. _,L..-,- . .,J "IR,ZoNP cOity o 04pache cOunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Agenda Approved by August 28, 1986 Date Item • Consent Agenda _..._,_ Public Hearing 9�1 ' 1/ MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL fir,/ Old Business THROUGH: ,KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER �" New Business THROUGH: RI"JCHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Postponedltem L yFROM. � JULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT. AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-29-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 532) BACKGROUND APPLICANT• Jerome and Mary Imperial REPRESENTATIVE: Daniel Rafferty LOCATION: between S. Stagecoach and S. Acacia Road from Highway 60 North to E. 18th Avenue CURRENT ZONING. General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING• General Commercial District C-3 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial GROSS ACREAGE: approximately 4.7 acres NET ACREAGE: approximately 3.6 acres CURRENT LAND USE: vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE. North - Roadrunner Mobile Home Park South - vacant East - vacant West - vacant SURROUNDING ZONING North - Trailer Homesite TH South - General Rural GR East - General Business Zone CB-2 West - General Business Zone CB-2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: site is relatively flat - it is raised approximately four to six feet above the elevation of Highway 60. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CI'mk COUNCIL '_' AGENDA ITEM - SEPT. 2, 1986 PZ-29-86 ORD. NO. 532 PAGE TWO PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site. The proposed rezoning is compatible with the zoning to the east and west. However, care will need to be taken in development of the site in relationship to the residential development north of the subject site. Therefore, staff would recommend approval of the zoning request, stipulating site plan approval prior to commencement of construction. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the North thirty- three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 26, 1986, after public hearing, adopted the following motion: (M/S Davies/Vanhoy 7-0-0) " I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-29-86, an application of Jerome and Mary Imperial for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. Any stipulations or recommendations are: 1 . Applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs at the intersections of U.S. 60 and East 20th Avenue unless East 20th Avenue is found .•. to be abandoned. 2. Site plan approval prior to commencement of construction from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council until such time as a Site Plan Review Ordinance is in place. The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 . This is otherwise compatible with the zoning of property along U.S. 60. 2. It is an acceptable use of the property." NOTE Staff originally recommended the dedication of the East thirty-three feet (33' ) and the West thirty-three feet (33' ) in addition to the North thirty-three feet (33' ) . It has come to our attention that these two roadways have been abandoned. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CIT`A` OUNCIL '-. AGENDA ITEM - SEPT. 2, 1,06 PZ-29-86 ORD. NO. 532 PAGE THREE STIPULATIONS IN THE ORDINANCE 1 . The dedication of the North thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 2. Site plan approval prior to commencement of construction from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council until such time as a Site Plan Review Ordinance is in place. JAR.CRN:KC.jo ... Am. PZ-29-86 GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT r- - - - - -- i r - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I 1 1 1 1 C-3 I TH 1 CITY LEASE ... I I I I BLM I I I ROADRUNNER MHP I VACANT l_ —___ ___ _ _ T,' I ____ ____ _ — ___ - - - - - ____ - -_I 0 cc N E. 18th Avenue VACAN of VACANT I r VACANTUI I OII CB-2NCB-2 I N I NN 1 . 0 1 I IN N N NI � i I \\ hvdJ- 60 ¢ I I CB-2 \ � ' I I .•. E 20th Avenue I I— — — __ ______I N CB-2 I I CB-2 I N TH I I 1 I I , 0 SUBJECT SITE 1 ; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) L-_.1 ► I I 1 Scale. 0 200 400 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From G�N-7'_AC_ olz.i\1� To Cl - 3 2 3 4 �. 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? 3. Size of your property: APwOX. .3SGx l02 c, [4] acres+ [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? ' 1e 1 i-Wta U 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North / 1 G/� l<. South -0 East -�' West 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: C % S w % , h.l W J s + T:, u-) S *z Ti (\I R E Section 27 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? /0 3 i i - O O 2 O 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number ('2 2'/ -,Y[, Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed 7-f-Y6 Application Received by. Receipt No. (, 7 5c Fee Amount J .0) Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 Aismk 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed U1\ts.1 RAi FEC7.IZ 1 Y as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 this application form.) (1) TGC[»Nt r-. 1 M P o ie r i4 (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) tith (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) ! (City, State, Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) r"- (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone dumber) (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF /2 C/LEL) The foregoingnstrunent_waF cknowledged befo e � ) SS. me this -? (j, day of �; COUNTY OF --I r N:1 L- ) by My Commission Expires- �f �,� �,l ;7- NOTARY PUBLE 10. 1 hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at the equest. )) (Print representative's name) (Signature o e esenta P vt (0 -Sa E. 3OU�i7�t� �r� 9, 4 - - - (Mailing address (Phone nuttier) (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF '1f'/Z"r,it) The foregoin nstrument was acknowledged before SS. me this .-(* day of 19 cf G COUNTY OF ,at;, ) by 1j� My Commission Expires. C f , �-)l' � ..r'-r -� �� ti01'ARY PUBLIC Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 532 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as the East of the Southwest ; of the Northwest ; of the Southeast in Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District, subject to the following stipulations 1)applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes, and 2) site plan approval prior to commencement of construction from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council until such time as a Site Plan Review Ordinance is in place SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F. Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / i )6 ITEM # � MEETING F 1/ MOTION BY: if\VU'a SECONDED BY: '`(\. Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL UNANI""OUS I IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE' SHEET 1 l) � NOTES iiidi i V 1) / 1 f "/ .0 ( w �� ' \;: ' c. civ ITEM # _ MEETING OF u MOTION BY: *" SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO I �' VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL J COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ i MAYOR HILL UNANITOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 11 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 532, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. ,••■•••• (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 532, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 532, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 532, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: Auk OW o�c PPACHF Jo 0 1 ;4_. ----it. - "IR/ZONP cOit / Ot C pache 09unction +. August 28, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM ACTING CITY MANAGER 0/ SUBJECT RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO 503 REQUESTED BY COUNCILMAN EIDSON This item has been placed on the agenda at the request of Councilman Eidson. Prior to any discussion on this item, it will first be necessary for a member of the council to make a motion for reconsideration. Since the ordinance was adopted unanimously, any member of the council (except Mayor Hill) can make a motion for reconsideration. Please note that this ordinance has already been legally advertised and will become effective on September 6th Agenda Approved by Date Item ft Consent Agenda —.--- -• kmc _ _ Public Hearing 77— Old Business ..1:-.' New Business --- Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ORDINANCE NO 503 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS, INSPECTIONS, ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE, UNAUTHORIZED WORK, EMERGENCY REPAIR, CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, ASSURANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, LIABILITY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE TO PERFORM WORK IN DEDICATED RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENT AREAS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVI- DING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL It is necessary in the public interest that all uses of the dedicated right of way, federally patented easements, and other easements for public roads, streets and alleys, by individuals, corporations and political subdivisions be regulated, managed and controlled so that said public areas may be effectively utilized and maintained for their primary purpose as public ways Persons, corporations, associations, or other political subdivisions shall not without obtaining a permit, enter upon any public road, federally patented easement and other easement, street, alley, or right of way of any public road, street, alley or way not a state high- way, and within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction for the purpose of performing any construction, reconstruction, removal, repair, maintenance, or any other work including, but not limited to, pavement, curb, driveway, side- walks, drainage or flood control facilities, grading, oiling, graveling, or any other surfacing of any road, street, alley or way, later, gas, sewer, or other types of pipelines, irrigation and wastewater facilities utility lines including electric, television, telephone, or other power service and communication facili- ties, structures and signs, whether temporary or permanent, planting, landscaping, water and or drainage systems, and decorative placements, or any of the aforesaid which may overhang the public road, street, alley or way The Engineering Divi- sion of the Department of Public Works is hereby authorized to issue such permits in accordance with conditions outlined in the current edition of the City of Apache Junction Development Guide, other applicable requirements, and the schedule of fees indicated herein SECTION II PERMITS All applications for permits shall be in writing on such form as required by th City Applications shall be submitted at least three working days prior to star of construction and shall be accompanied by three (3) approved copies of a draw- ing, map, diagram, or similar exhibit of a size and sufficient to clearly illu- strate the location, dimension, motive, method and purpose of the proposed work Applicants for such permits may be either an owner or a contractor; however, the work may be performed only by (1) a contractor (2) utility company (3) governmental agency or (4) resident owner of residential property where the property owner proposes to do the work If the improvement to be constructed under the permit is not to become the property of the city and if the applicant is someone other than the owner, the owner shall also sign the permit form indicating that he agrees to the conditions of the permit. Permits shell be issued only to the person, corporation, or political subdivision making application, and therefore may not be assigned to another person, corporation, or political subdivision, by the permittee If the permittee assigns his permit to another, the permit shall become void A permit shall be valid for the time indicated on the permit which shall not exceed twelve (12) months. If work is not completed within the allotted time, a new permit must be obtained for such remaining work If the work, or a portion of the work is not performed after a permit is obtained, the permit shall be cancelled and the unused portion, minus ten (10")percent for processing, of the fee related to inspection costs may be refunded at the request of the applicant ORDINANCE NO 503 PAGE ONE OF FIVE c SECTION III INSPECTIONS The city may provide the applicants with inspection services to determine if the improvements constructed are substantially in accordance with the approved plan, special conditions, and permit granted Any person or corporation, association or political subdivision doing work under any permit as set forth in this ordi- nance shall notify the Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works at least one (1) full working day in advance of the time and place the work will begin SECTION IV FEE SCHEDULE A Applicant shall, before any plan is reviewed or permit is issued, provide the city with a fee to offset expenses incurred in connection with process- ing and inspecting work. The fee shall be computed on the basis of the fee schedule contained herein. B Development plan and hydrology review fees First Review $30 00 per sheet Second Review No Charge Third Review $15 00 per sheet Revisions/changes after approval $10 00 per sheet Should applicant desire plan reviews to be expedited beyond the normal pro- cessing limits in effect at the time, arrangements may be requested for city- accelerated plan reviews after normal working hours, as follows Weekday (before/after normal working hours) $ 5 00 plus 1 1/2 times plan checkers hourly wage ( Saturdays 10.00 plus 1 1/2 times plan checkers hourly tt wage. Sundays 20 00 plus 2 times plan checkers hourly wage C Engineering inspection fees. Initial application fee $ 5 00 Curb and gutter 0 06 per lineal foot Sidewalk 0 06 per lineal foot Pavement, including subgrade & A B C 0.16 per square yard Driveway and alley entrance 0 10 per square foot Valley gutter 0 04 per lineal foot Catchbasin 15 00 each Scupper 15.00 each Headwall 15.00 each Stormdrain 0.15 per lineal foot Concrete channel 0 05 per square foot Dirt channel 0 10 per lineal foot Other concrete structures 2% o` total cost Site grading - 50 cubic yards or less $10 00 each site 51 to 100 cubic yards $15 00 each site 101 to 1000 cubic yards $15 00 for first 100 cubic yards plus $7 00 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof 1001 to 10,000 cubic yards $78.00 for the first 1000 cubic yards, plus 56 00 for each addi- tional 1000 cubic yards or fraction thereat ORDINANCE NO. 503 PAGE TWO OF FIVE a 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $132 00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus 527 00 for each addi- tional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof 100,001 cubic yards or more S375 00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus 515 00 for each addial 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereo,r Re-inspection To be computed at the above rates Inspection for which no rate is specified To be determined by Engineering Division ($20 00 minimum fee) Inspections requested from the city for work on weekends and after normal working hours may be performed upon advance payment to the city by the applicant or contrac- tor Fees for overtime inspections are as follows Weekdays (before/after normal working hours) 515 00 plus 1 1/2 times inspectors hourly wage. Saturdays 25.00 plus 1 1/2 times inspectors hourly wage Sundays 35 00 plus 2 times inspectors hourly wage D. Requests for inspections or plan reviews beyond normal working hours may be performed at the pleasure of the city as a courtesy to the applicant and is not intended to be a mandated service This extra work may be performed by e" the city predicated on the availability of manpower and the employee's agreement to work accordingly providing their normal job requirements and health are not negatively impacted E Should the applicant desire the expediting of wor•< beyond the limits and/or capability of the city at the time, arrangements may be made by the city for work to be performed by a consulting firm providing the applicant pays the consultant's fee plus ten (10;) percent to offset city expenses SECTION V UNAUTHORIZED WORK Any work undertaken prior to securing a permit may be required to be restored to it's original condition prior to granting a permit, or the city may charge a fee not to exceed $500.00 in addition to the normal fee for inspection and examination of the work done, prior to issuance of a permit. All stop work orders shall require that work cease until the Engineering Division determines whether the construction should be restored to it's original condition or grants a permit in accordance with this ordinance SECTION VI EMERGENCY REPAIR This ordinance shall not prevent any person, corporation or political subdivision from maintaining any pipe or utility lawfully on or under any public street, or from making excavation or performing any work as may be necessary for the preserva- tion of life or property when an urgen necessity arises during the hours that the city offices are closed, except that those making emergency use shall apply for a permit within one (1) calendar day after the city offices are again open SECTION VII CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS All work performed in said public roads, streets, alleys or ways shall be done in accordance with the approved permit, plan, specifications and special provi- sions of the city for such installation. The city may require additional work, materials, equipment and devices to properly control traffic, provide access to adjoining property, and maintain other facilities in the area during the time work is being performed ORDINANCE NO 503 �, PAGE THREE OF FIVE SECTION VIII ASSURANCE OF CONSTRUCTION Prior to issuing a permit, each applicant shall submit to the city an assurance of construction as outlined in the current edition of the city's Development Guide. In instances where an applicant is issued numerous small permits through- ^ out the year, he may post a continuing use bond to cover work under more than one permit, however, this continuing bond provision is not intended for use to construct residential and commercial projects. The continuing bond shall be of value sufficient to cover all work under construction by the permittee at any time and shall be satisfactory to the city. SECTION IX LIABILITY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE No applicant shall be entitled to a permit under this ordinance unless and until he shall have filed and maintained on file with the city a certificate certifying that he and/or his company or business firm carries public liability and property damage insurance issued by an insurance carrier authorized to do business in the State of Arizona insuring the applicant and the city and it's agents, against loss by reason of injuries to or death of persons, or damages to property arising out of or related to work performed by the applicant, it's agents or employees while performing any work under such permit Such insurance shall be primary and provide coverage for all liability assumed by the applicant under this section, and shall be provided by any permittee in the follcwing minimum amounts. $500,000 00 for death of or injury to any one person in any one accident $1,000,000 00 for death of or injury to more than one person in any one accident $500,000 00 for property damage. 1• Failure by the applicant to provide the city with such a certificate and failure by the city to demand the filing by permittee of such a certificate before such a permit is issued, shall not be deemed to waive permittee's obligation to provide the insurance specified herein. Such insurance certificate shall remain in effect, and be kept on file with the city, until all work to be performed by the permittee under the permit has been completed Where an encroachment involves a permanent obstruction, such insurance certificate requirements and other stipulations shall remain in effect until such construction is removed The insurance certificate shall provide that coverage cannot be cancelled or expire without providing fifteen (15) days written notice to the city of such action and noting the permit number on such written notice. No evidence of liability insurance or surety bond shall be required as a condition precedent to the issuance of a permit to a resi- dent owner of a residential property where he proposes to perform construction in front of his own property, or a federal, state, county or municipal agency or political subdivision, or any public service corporation with a net worth of more than one million ($1,000,000) dollars as reflected by it's most current balance sheet The permittee shall be responsible for all liability imposed by law for personal injury or property damage arising out of or related to work performed by the permittee under permit, or arising out of the failure on the permittee's part to perform it's work under the permit. If any claim of such liability is made against the city, it's officers, agents, boards or employees, the permittee shall defend, indemnifyand hold eachof them harmless from such claims including claims alleging the joint negligence of the city, it's officers and employees, and the permittee. SECTION X EXEMPTIONS A no-cost permit may be issued to federal, state or county agencies for work in which a contractor is engaged in a city sponsored project SECTION XI REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by leterence are hereby repealed ORDINANCE NO 503 PAGE FOUR OF FIVE SECTION XII PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION XIII PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of any violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required and provided for in this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000, or imprisonment for a period not :o exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS 516 DAY OF August , 19 86 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 7+4 DAY OF A,yws>` , 19 86, �airres..y a B a.�ui �t.Q , ✓,c.-M a y e r Ire. Norman S Hill Mayor I ATTEST /4( -1£ £,cam Lce 7e- L2-%7� Kathleen Connelly 0 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. D vi F Alexan e/ City Attorney t ORDINANCE NO 503 PAGE FIVE OF FIVE t.Q p.CHE '�RIZONP do ity Apache 09unction September 2, 1986 MEMO TO: DAVID F. ALEXANDER, CITY ORN FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS • SUB JECT: INSURANCE Item No. 12 on the Council Agenda calls for reconsideration of Ordinance No. 503. It is my understanding that the primary reason for this action is the requirement for liability and property damage insurance. In these regards, we have contacted several Valley governmental agencies and have prepared a matrix of their insurance requirements. Furthermore, we have contacted insurance agents and have confirmed that the insur- ance is available and that the rates would vary due to the type of contractor's license, the contractor's experience, gross receipts, payroll , number of vehicles and equipment, etc. We are informed by an insurance agent that not requiring insurance could result in higher costs to the City for insurance or cancellation of the City's insurance. On past occasions, various comments have been made as to the availability and cost of insurance. Along these lines, I have taken the opportunity to provide you with excerpts from the Arizona Tradition magazine in regard to "The Insurance Crisis" . Should you wish a copy of the entire publication, please contact this office. As we previously discussed, this information is provided to your office for review and discussion with the City Council as may be appropriate. RWB:sh Attach: Matrix Excerpts xc City Council Acting City Manager File 100.04 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ) ) ) •Death/Injury Death/Injury . Property Propperty Excessive Workman's General *Certificate Employee 1 Person More than 1 Damage Damage & Liability Compensation Liability of Insurance Liability 1 accident 1 accident . Liability Required City of Phoenix 1,000,000 100,000 yes City of Scottsdale Minimum Requirements Small Project 250,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 yes General Construction 5,000,000 yes City of Mesa Right of Way Only 500,000 500,000 yes City of Chandler 500,000 2,000,000 500,000 100,000 Town of Gilbert Right of Way Only 500,000 yes ' Maricopa County (3 alternatives) A 500,000 1, 000,000 500,000 B 1,000,000 C 1,000,000 yes Pina3 Court\ Will comply P( €artrar of Contractors Will Comply (Proposed) City of Apache Junction 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 yes ,__. Contractor insurance rates vary according to type of license, experience, gross receipts, payroll, number of vehicles, etc. c2,n00 00 per year for $500,000 property damage and liability combined $5, 000 00 per year for $500,000 to 1,000,000 *Based upon primary insured, Caty'will accept inclusion clause, (add on) from Insurance Company, naming City as insured. PS _ .. x . ''L+ ... ':: "`_.: :a Ekt market Soon they were declaring dividends for their shareholders out of the profits made off premium dollars they had invested, and the modern insurance industry was horn As long as they The Insur au c a collected enough dollars in premiums, ` and their investments were profitable, /� - the new stock insurance companies were 1 ,"{xi ''. secure, and there was no `insurance :M? crisis" %1 µ: Enormous fortunes were made, and insurance over the decades became one of the richest segments of the American economy It experienced some trifling ups and downs, but they were negligible As long as interest rates stayed up near rizona faces an "insuranceA 20 percent, the insurance companies crisis" i were content To understand why the Then a measure of greed set in, "insurance crisis" has been thrust u and they began to compete, one company upon us, we have to go back to the with another, by lowering their policy original purpose of insurance It was it ►L ! - rates in order to run to the money invented to spread the risk of losses fi ` - a r ;' market with larger amounts of money from accidents and catastrophes so that They wanted to cash in on the higher {�bus � interest rates, and as a result they ess be economically no one person owipe dnout entity would '�� ! underpriced their policies to the public Liability insurance is different from ` i ,:i, In some cases they even priced policies life insurance and health insurance It is — ti. at a loss so they could take advantage liability or property/casualty insurance of a period of "cash-flow underwriting that we are primarily concerned with in "' ' to get money they could invest at 20 this crisis .a- percent Individuals run the risk of being - --- \ ` It was all wonderful until interest injured or harmed by the negligence of - rates plummeted, leaving them stuck others, and as victims, they should be - with thousands of underpnced insurance compensated whether the wrongdoer has policies they had sold the public It was insurance or not Millions of people °� great for the consumers, but a disaster carry liability insurance as a hedge against for the insurance industry in the early this situation, so they can be compensated 1980's They found themselves deprived for of both high premium income and high /1` • medical and hospital costs created formed 'mutual" insurance companies interest income by their injury, They were designed to spread the risk This is the cycle of boom and bust • income lost by being off the job or among others like themselves so that no that has always been in effect with the absent from their businesses, one would be wiped out in a lawsuit insurance industry • pain and suffenng (including mental These "mutuals" went along for To regain their economic balance, ,; and emotional upsets) brought many years Some, in changed forms, the Amencan insurance companies — about by their injury exist today underwritten by"reinsurers"from overseas Everyone, including most courts Once entrepreneurs discovered that like Lloyd's of London — did the only and juries, assumes that persons who these mutuals"were holding large amounts things they could do 4. cause others injuries should pay to make of money over long periods of time as 1) raise the price of insurance, that person whole again" and, in some reserves against claims by injured and cases, pay punitive damages as a people, they transformed the primitive 2) cancel policies held by higher-risk punishment for causing the injury, mutual" into a stock" company Then insureds Persons who cause injuries to others they asked outside people, those not Now Anzonans face difficult times fall back on their insurance company to part of the original scheme, to invest in Their insurance premium rates are pay for the expenses and damages they the insurance business and make money increasing dramatically and coverage is cause There was a time however, as shareholders off the investment income being cancelled when insurance did not exist to cover available They lumped the money from Citizens and public interest groups these injuries sales of stock with the premiums and are beginning to awaken to the problem, In the United States,a few generations invested it in other stocks in banks, in however, and the coming months are ago, persons or businesses who feared land, in buildings, and in the money likely to see much more discussion of they would be at risk for injuring someone this crisis and proposed solutions 4 • i • • • et, Business is Ioimi i i g he American economic picture is billion According to analysts at insurance brightening The stock market is $71Best's, the insurance industry managed up Inflation is down Interest $71 4 to increase profits, despite record Jack Webb, a builder just north of rates are dropping underwriting losses, because the industry Phoenix, who is erecting a resort at Unemployment is relatively steady And amassed $19 7 billion from investments, Rock Springs, said his premiums jumped consumers are benefiting from an increase $6 5 billion from capital gains, and $6 6 in April of 1986 from $1,700 to $19,000 in disposable income billion in other income (including federal But there are some dark clouds on income tax refunds and new capital) Kirk Amster, owner of Auto Safety the horizon One of the most difficult The Stock Index measures investor House, said he spends two hours a day problems faced by an ever-increasing confidence in the insurance industry In looking for insurance "just in case' his number of individuals and businesses is recent months, there has been a steep current policy is unilaterally cancelled the skyrocketing cost of liability climb(over a 50%increase)in the Property/ insurance Casualty Insurance Industry stocks For The Arizona Council of Centers for There is growing concern, in Arizona January-December, 1985, despite the Children and Adolescents said in May of and elsewhere, over the "insurance large reported underwriting loss, the 1986 premium increases for many social crisis " analysts for A M Best's offered the service agencies with which it interfaces Physicians, hospitals, nurses, following evaluation in January, 1986 have averaged 610 percent engineers, schools, day care centers, "Investor interest in the property/ small businessmen, industries, all are casualty industry cannot be denied United Way Agencies of Arizona,consisting being threatened with huge losses, since While the DOW Industrials Average of 150 projects, have reported insurance many insurance companies are simply has made headlines by surpassing premium jumps of as much as 400 percent cancelling liability coverage altogether the 1500 mark (a 25% gain for the in the past two years while coverage In the last 12 months, amidst all year), Best's Index of property/ has dwindled and exceptions, deductions, the discussion of the so-called insurance casualty companies has jumped and stipulations have increased "crisis, the surplus of the property/casualty 50% at this writing, and security industry increased $7 6 billion to a record analysts specializing in insurance — Dan Belisle of Arizona Nursing Home and cognizant of 1985 s underwriting 4S4 111111111111111111•111111111111 losses — nevertheless continue to .w 111111•11111•111111111111M be optimistic about the industry's ' IMMOR �� ri prospects ' we G ��•�� 1111� M In April of 1986 in Phoenix, a White ' ua•EM��MME House Conference on Small Business SO• IIII u•�uu••u••u��u•• aired some of the problems that are 12 4" hittinginsurance consumers in the .•, w d•��,�'�� pocketbook in Arizona . 11111Miri I I 1 �.■■■■■■. Several Arizona business and �• professional people related"horror stories" 2N S. ��•1•11 that amply demonstrate the character011111 „• A�� and extent of their feelings about the 2N 1.111111, 1^ �1�� current `crisis in insurance W , �■.■■■ ., _ N 2a �Eu■��. A physical therapist—His annual premium 1a Dow-Jones Average m 27e 11 jumped from $2,000 to $34,000 in 1986, 30 6 11 20 27 4 II IS 25 1 • 15 22 2• oleo., r,o..mo., o... ..., N ^^. . . forcing him to go 'naked' or without 1• 70 71 72 72 74 75 70 77 7• 7• N S1 Si •2 44 115 1965 ,seb �... ... ,.. .., .,...,. 6 • Jack Kearney, business manager for Scottsdale Unified School District, reports that Insurance premiums have gone up to $689,000 in 1986 from $240,211 in 1985 Coverage dropped to $6 million from $11 million He says that insurance companies in the past 21 years have paid out only about $500,000 — ®� ® e in Jack against this district ® • • Jack Lunsford of the Maricopa County Community College District reports that the district's insurance has risen 300 percent, and the college had to appropriate $260,000 from its contingency fund to meet the expense GROWTH IN NET WORTH George Hayes at the University of Arizona, ance a80 fin BILLIONS of Dollars) manager property institution,r says $71 4 insurance in 1986 costs twice what 70 " $65.6 $63.8 - it did in 1985 The new premium $60.4 is $4 2 million, and deductibles 60 were increased from $450,000 to S52 2 $53.8 ; S $1 million 60 $42.4 Many are now asking why this kind 40 - r-. f of crisis exists $35.4 - ' Insurance companies are reluctant 30 - ''it t r to confess that much of the problem has ``` been caused by simple mismanagement r Companies sold high risk liability policies $119 i€ = s :t in the late 70 s and early 80's for cut-throat io - " At premiums They sold for low premiums in order to get more cash to invest k Some rates of return on investment ° amounted to more than 20 percents 1960 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 Their revenue from these investments SOURCE Best'. Aggregates and Averages as reported by Insurance Information Institute was enough to make uppremiums eiN for 1960-1984 The 1985 figure Is from Best's Review January 1986 g for low and to make handsome profits, too But with the advent of the Reagan Association says liability insurance to Scott Moffatt, director of the Arizona Administration interest rates and inflation premiums are going up by 300 percent Association for Child Care Management dropped The insurance companies were in his industry which has 400 members statewide, 255 left with thousands of high risk insurance of them in Phoenix policies, sold at those low premiums, A survey of 980 agencies that provide Moffatt says that the state requires and collecting limited investment services to the Anzona Department of $500,000 minimum coverage for $13 to income Economic Security, including day-care $15 per child per year Now, the coverage In an attempt to shift the blame for centers, services to the aging, costs $50 per child per year, and the bad investment strategy, insurance developmentally disabled persons and maximum coverage available is $500,000 company managers have now attacked many others, showed that insurance Day care has suffered enormously during large segments of their own policyholders payments in comprehensive and general the insurance crisis They have begun to cancel policies and liability increased 109 percent from 1984 The Arizona education system has raise premiums These policyholder to 1985 Professional liability insurance felt the sting of the insurance crisis attacks, however, are unjustified by the increased 93 percent in the same period industry economics Significant increases were also experienced Premium increases at Mesa Unified What is clear is that Americas in auto liability coverage (67 percent), School District have gone up from booming economy is being threatened property damage (40 percent), and bond $300,000 in 1984 to $900 000 in by insurance company maneuvering coverage (79 percent) 1986 enough to pay the salaries of Only time will tell whether their lack of Insurance rates are going up by as 30 full-time teachers foresight will cause permanent and much as 1,000 percent per year, according irreversible harm 7 • One of the "hot" issues on the POINT• We have often heard thousands of personal injury cases current public agenda in Arizona that juries have been running What's more, in 70 percent of is the"insurance crisis". Physicians, wild and giving outrageous damage those high award cases, the victim day care centers, schools, small awards to victims out of all was either permanently paralyzed, businesses, thousands of proportion to what is just and brain damaged or killed Large individuals and groups are being practicable awards reflect large injunes and hit by skyrocketing premiums In the losses that accompany them some cases, insurance isn't COUNTERPOINT "Far from available at any price running wild," says the Consumer POINT: The insurance industry Arguments are flying, fast and Federation of America, `juries says it has suffered crippling losses furious, about what caused the have adjusted their awards to in the past five years, and has crisis and how it can be solved. reflect the basic social and been forced to raise premiums Some people point at the legal economic changes that have taken and cancel high-risk groups system, others at the insurance place in the past decade. they companies, others at the State are making awards to their peers COUNTERPOINT: The only Constitution, and still others say that are consistent with the losses have been suffered by the that we're to blame: the very increasing economic output of victims, who can't collect, and insurance consumers who are society and value placed on life " the consumers, who must continue supposed to be protected against to pay extraordinary premiums risk. POINT: Some people say that The insurance industry is in The truth is that there are points damage awards to victims have excellent financial health $72 /' orth considering on all sides of risen out of sight and juries are billion increase in assets, the issue. This edition of Point/ completely unjustified in giving outperforming most other stocks, Counterpoint looks at the million dollar awards. $8 billion surplus, $442 million "insurance crisis" and how to operating profit, compensation to solve it. COUNTERPOINT• The nationally top executives up 60% — and known research firm, Jury Verdict no taxes paid in ten years This Research, has found only 1,642 data comes from information cases where the jury award supplied by the insurance exceeded$1 million to an individual companies to their stockholders. plaintiff This out of hundreds of • i 8 �' ":" .oi: ^yF ""°^T'7+°t"'"a",'�'-+• � .:«;�„�rs.,73: ....:-;^ni.... -ro _ ..:tom :-,: 3l.v.w:.T. .�`-r._ + _r�rso- :�>.__ .€ �'tti�"�..* �+x�:;.�.,.,-.av- �.,v:�a.5,.:�ev�;«'wI�L,..rr��+a..,.f.. .�wr�:a.:'- �: B th i es of t _ ,,,,I "Insurance Crisis POINT: The insurance companies Center for State Courts found predictable for years say they may have to quit writing that over an eight-year penod, insurance and go out of business 1976-84, civil litigation was up a POINT: The Constitution is only in states where they do not get modest nine percent, versus an a piece of paper We change it the civil justice system changed eight percent population increase, whenever necessary to suit them but also found that during the last three years of the study (1981- COUNTERPOINT: No question COUNTERPOINT Insurance is 84) civil filings actually decreased that the document shouldn't be a very competitive and lucrative four percent "Apparently," they frozen in stone. But making business. In Flonda, where the concluded, "the litigation changes which reduce basic rights issues are much the same as in explosion, if it existed, is over." of citizens ought to come only Anzona, many insurers have quit after long and thoughtful writing, but the State Insurance POINT: Insurance companies are deliberation. That may be why Commissioner says. "Every day a forced to raise premiums because the State Legislature and Governor company refuses to write . . is so many claims must be settled this year refused to approve the another day of risking permanently in court, and it is impossible to insurance industry's suggested lost business There is economic predict what the awards will be changes in the state's legal vibrance [here] and over the system long haul the industry isn't going COUNTERPOINT: While it to pass it up." varies from state to state, the POINT: Some people say juries number of claims reaching court just give too much money away ^POINT: Some people say there and resulting in jury verdicts We ought to curb them. has been a litigation explosion — stays between just five and ten everybody suing everybody — percent. In fact, the COUNTERPOINT: It's clear that which has choked our courts, comprehensive National the jury system isn't perfect. But I delayed real justice and brought Association of Attorneys General it's far better than the proposed about this insurance crisis Report states that the median alternative The eight-person Junes jury award has not increased that decide lawsuits in Arizona COUNTERPOINT: Not true — more than the rate of inflation have heard hundreds of thousands actually the reverse A study by In actual terms, awards have of issues since the state began the highly respected National remained just as stable and Public confidence in the jury system is very high To suggest placing jury award decisions in the hands of the political leadership of the State Legislature is risky, particularly when insurance company executives have already said that it will not affect insurance premiums 9 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES fi) 46' q)}. ITEM ft \ll MEETING 0 Her 1 PLOTION EY. (c, (/°j SECONDED BY . YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ W COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL UNANI OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE S EET NOTES vit t \ . \ P \)) ITEM # IV MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 0-6 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ �CO'6 T COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 12 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 503, BE RECONSIDERED. I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 503, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). oink Ask O� PQACHE�G2 is _,► . .y -y "9PIZOX•11'' cOity e &Apache 0)unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Agenda Approved by LNG August 26, 1986 Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Old Business THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER 0v New Business _' r' t FROM: Cu CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Postponed Item PREPARED BY: ' JIM NAKAGAWA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/ASSOCIATE PLANNER •u, SUBJECT- AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 - NEW BUSINESS PZ-51-83 (WINDSONG MOBILE HOME PARK) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This is a major amendment planned development request by Ms. Joni Hegel of Sierra National Corporation. This project was previously known as Rainbow Valley, a 20-acre 200-lot recreational vehicle subdivision on the Southwest corner of Lost Dutchman Boulevard and Ironwood Drive. The applicant is proposing a 136 space rental mobile home park. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS They propose to provide 133,392 square feet of open space which satisfies our 15 percent requirement. Their gross density would be 6.8 units per acre. They propose to only have 8-foot wide patios and 10-foot wide carports for their spaces and they have indicated that they understand their tenants will have to live with those restrictions. The State Health Department is reviewing their group septic disposal system plans. Drainage and off- site improvements will be handled by the Public Works Department. The Building Department will handle the final planned development processing stage. Since the intent of the Planned Development Ordinance is to encourage creative designs and to counteract the effects of monotony, the treatment of the perimeter wall and the landscaping in the case of a mobile home park becomes important. Staff's aim is to keep walls from creating an im- pression of a straight tunnel running down the street. This project has been through three plan reviews and planning staff would like to see how well the landscaping works with the perimeter wall design. Staff's recommended stipulations are listed in the recommended motion - this major amendment is consistent with the Medium Density Residential General Plan designation. The Development Coordinating Committee on August 14, 1986, found no objection to the revision of the planned eve opment. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 The Honorable Mayor 'mb'i City Council - PZ-51-83 - AgE"i Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Two RECOMMENDED MOTION I move that a planned development major amendment for Windsong Mobile Home Park by Sierra National Corporation be (approved) (denied) . STIPULATIONS ARE. 1. That final plans for development be in substantial conformance to the approved preliminary PD plan. 2. That the plans for the perimeter wall , wrought iron fencing, and landscaping be prepared by the applicant's architect/landscape architect and approved by the Apache Junction Planning Department. 3. That the applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50' ) , the East fifty feet (50' ) , the West thirty-three feet (33' ) , and the South thirty- three feet (33' ) of the site for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs at intersections. 4. That the signing and lighting plans be submitted at the final plan stage. 5. This preliminary approval will expire on July 3, 1987. Either final plans must be approved by then or another time extension must be approved. JAN:CRN:jl ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET • NOTESj C (iC"/ ttl'j ,.. IP "1. tip' • tY; WA' v)\ ITEM # ' MEETING 0 C cJ MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: 6 Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ✓ V MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL C- ------__- NO. 13 --- - ITEM I MOVE THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR WINDSONG MOBILE HOME PARK BY SIERRA NATIONAL CORPORATION BE (APPROVED/DENIED). Ok 0\cHF JG'L U , ., jr~ Yok. z '9PlzONP cOity o C4pache 09unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .labk Agenda Approved by 'te—, Date Item $ August 21 , 1986 Consent Agenda Public Hearing MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL / t / Old Business THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER VA'' New Business 9/ -Vt' /,/ THROUGH: It/CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Postponed Item FROM: tiI-JULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 EXPIRATION OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PZ-26-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 130) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project was to have been a CB-2/PD General Business by Planned Development zoning proposal for a mini-storage, RV storage and retail store complex to be located at the intersection of N. Apache Trail , N. Winchester Rd. and E. Superstition Blvd. The last extension expired on December 18, 1985. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Aim nek, The developer has indicated that General Business by Planned Development CB-2/PD would not be the most appropriate zoning for the subject property, (copy of letter in your packet) and requests that the property revert to an appropriate designation to be determined by the City Council . According to Section 19.0111 , Article 19 of the Apache Junction, Arizona Zoning Ordinance, a Planned Development shall be reviewed within one year after the approval of the preliminary plan. The effect of this review is• 1 . The zoning reverts back to the previous base zone. or 2. The zoning reverts to any other appropriate designation (deter- - mined by City Council ) . or 3. If applicant demonstrates good cause necessitating an extension which would serve the public interest, the City Council may grant an extension of time not to exceed one year. (Update of final plans and improvement plans to current City standards required. ) 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 .�. p The original zoning classification was GR-General Rural . However, this site is located in an area designated by the General Plan for commercial use and would be appropriate for this use. Staff would recommend that the zoning classification revert to C-3 General Commercial District for the North 200 feet and C-2 Local Commercial District for the South 410 feet , and further stipulate that development occur only after site plan approval . RECOMMENDED MOTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the approved extension of one year ending December 18, 1985 for rezoning case PZ-26-81 (Ordinance No. 130) has expired and therefore shall be reverted to the zoning classification of C-3 General Commercial District for the North 200 feet and C-2 Local Commercial District for the South 410 feet , this classification being deemed an appropriate designation for the subject site, stipulating that site plan approval occur prior to commencement of construction. JAR•jo ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r /ti\:6‘ -4ti v441' 1/ v ITEM 1 # MEET I NG F r /j V MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : 1 YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ I.1�4`J QPN�f 0 R' COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 14 I MOVE THAT THE APPROVED EXTENSION OF ONE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 18, 1985, FOR REZONING CASE PZ-26-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 130) HAS EXPIRED AND THEREFORE SHALL BE REVERTED TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FOR THE NORTH 200 FEET AND C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FOR THE SOUTH 410 FEET, THIS CLASSIFICATION BEING DEEMED AN APPROPRIATE DESIGNA10IV FOR THE SUBJECT SITE, STIPULATING THAT SITE PLAN APPROVAL OCCUR PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. Ink ill Elk 0� PQp.CHE do U A- 40 Z ,,. q,p/ZONP CO ty U e,'pac/e &l unction August 27, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER W FROM: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION LETTER OF SUPPORT, KENDLEWOOD MANUFACTURING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REVOLVING LOAN ASSISTANCE Kendlewood Manufacturing has acquired a five-acre site at Cactus and Baseline in Pinal County near the city limits for the production of custom-made, modular commercial and office units. This is to be a start- up operation with an initial employment of 15-20 persons and is expected to increase to 80-100 persons within 15 months. This department has been involved with this project since March, pro- viding assistance in meeting rezoning requirements, employment recruiting planning, and exploring potential financing avenues. A special use permit request is pending before the Pinal County Planning and Zoning ........ Commission for September 17 in lieu of the firm pursuing rezoning from C1-1 to CI-2. Time has become a critical factor in getting into production. The City Planning and Zoning Commission has made a favorable recommen- dation to the Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of the Special Use Permit, subject to certain stipulations. In the meantime various financing sources are being explored. One of these is a Community Development Block Grant Revolving Loan through the Arizona Department of Commerce. Part of the pre-application process requires a letter of support for the project from the City Council . A motion authorizing the Mayor or Vice Mayor to provide a letter of support for the Kendlewood Manufacuring Project to the Director of the �y Arizona Department of Commerce will suffice. Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business �-_;4i, `' Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 8002 Memorandum to Honorable Mayor et al . Page 2 August 27, 1986 As the application proceeds, the City will be asked to assume certain responsibilities such as holding public hearings, submitting formal application for funds, and monitoring the project to ensure compliance with criteria and terms of loan. The attached sheet presents highlights ,.., of the CDBG program. JMS:bsp Attachment Am. 411 STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REVOLVING LOAN FUND PROGRAM PURPOSE: To provide financial assistance for economic development pro- jects which create new employment opportunities (or retain existing jobs) , at least 60% of which must be made available to low and moderate income persons. BENEFITS: Flexibility. Provides short to moderate term loans. Deferred payments of principal and/or interest, below market interest rates and other aspects of financing are negotiable to enable a project to proceed. USES: Site/facility acquisition and improvements, construction, equipment, industrial and commercial rehabilitation, and other business development costs. ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS: Businesses must be sponsored by their city, town or county, and must be located in Arizona, but outside of Maricopa and Pima Counties. SPECIFICS OF FINANCING: After a project is approved by Commerce, a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is awarded to the local government in the form of a contract, with an attached loan agreement between the local government and the business. The contract and loan agreement spell out the terms and conditions of the loan. The loan funds are disbursed by the local community to the business. However, in most cases the loan is repaid directly to Commerce by the business at a previously negotiated rate and term. APPLICATION PROCEDURES: A Preliminary Application form can be obtained from: Department of Commerce, CDBG Program, 1700 West Washington, Phoenix, Arizona 85007. All projects must meet specified criteria, as outlined in the Pre-Application. For further information or assistance, telephone (602) 255-4920. yPACHE✓G O O a�v gR,Z00' amity a &4pac/e 02unction PROPOSED LETTER ^ September 4, 1986 Ms. Rita Carillo, Director Arizona Department of Commerce 1700 West Washington Executive Tower, 4th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Dear Ms. Carillo: The City Council of Apache Junction expresses support for the application of Kendlewood Manufacturing for Community Development Block Grant Re- volving Loan Fund assistance through the Arizona Department of Commerce. Kendlewood is establishing a manufacturing operation located at Cactus Street and Baseline Road in Pinal County near the city limits for production of custom-made, modular commercial and office units. This project is expected to generate a minimum of 15-20 jobs initially and as many as 80-100 jobs during the first 15 months of operations. The Arizona Department of Economic Security reports an 18.2% unemployment rate for Apache Junction as of July 1986. This project would help alle- viate this condition and particularly benefit low and moderate income persons. Cordially, Mayor or Vice Mayor 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Cf y ITEM # MEETING OF O f TIO N BY: � SECONDED BY . YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL J UNANI"1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ad Ilk r— ITEM NO. 15 I MOVE THAT THE MAYOR 1 0#4IR' 1'f' BE AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE KENDLEWOOD MANUFACTURING PROJECT TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. Ink AisIlk (p.irikCHS jG2 q,p/ZpNPZty o Cpache unction MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM: ✓ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE : AUGUST 26 , 1986 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD Attached is a Talent Bank Application for B. J. Sutherland , who is interested in serving on the Youth Advisory Board . There is currently one opening on the Adult portion of this Board . Mr . Sutherland will be contacted and asked to attend the regular Council meeting so the Council can meet him. It is recommended that B. J. Sutherland be appointed /04., to the Youth Advisory Board . Agenda Approved by 1(-- C:". Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business RR(7 _ _ Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 `ti F PQACHE../, fl 0 t 1 . Z x qR/ZONP V ity o ClIciche 9ZLnclion 4 _ TALENT BANK APPLICATION K-r FOR Y1,4_1 ,! AetIItS :)rl 62,,sc " / BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE j 3. DATE: " /3 —SC Y NAME: G, eJ /q., :5u+I, f' r/ a n, .'i TELEPHONE: 7 5' ---5 C) 9 0 U.L, (home) (office) '. ADDRESS: / ( S: //.'_ -, /.'.• ZIP CODE• S 12 / 9 F, , ` OCCUPATION. •D is---- ,l ...• ,r " ,,,j 41 o ' ; .. .,./ r-y,,, 4) r;, Al, r A, ,,,.„,, e 1 ; iit - (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDTION: / 77 , „• .`-PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: /// S;4 r ,a - -! ,, e;? {'ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: br'0 r/;r ,r/ ,a i ,f,' E•:=1 1,—/.1(7 _ --- >L (I //,_ /) /! () (- (`ri I,• --I-- 1/-1/ J�"/ // J NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, O`� and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. C) \-. --/ e..e.:..--.... -w„"_ �_ , l i/ /��ii _ice / Revised 6/19/81 of Ai ricant ignatureIP 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,A2IZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES L 1 t� P \ ') 1,2(,) ITEM # c( i MEETING OF , l/ �n MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : C}�c YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO I VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL +J UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL An 16k 4,11111. fir. ITEM NO. 16 I MOVE THAT IY >1.41J2,741 BE APPOINTED TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD. r PgACHF✓e, O 0 i ►— @'Il t_ p U ,��;,`1$1:►,�►i►i z 7 T '_..... P 'Oily elf 04pache 09unction ... MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM: 5DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE : AUGUST 26 , 1986 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Attached is a Talent Bank Application recently sub- mitted by Nicholas McVicker who is interested in serv- ing on the City ' s Parks and Recreation Commission . The Commission currently has two openings and no other Talent Bank Applications are on file . It is recommended that Nicholas McVicker be appointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission . Your consideration of this request is appreciated . Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business --_ _ Ith New Business / 1 Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 l'----- U -h , f 1. ;f c; ':..41 :y) .,,. ,..2 ; , t ,,,,...._-,.4-2_ / TALENT BANK APPLI C4TI0N FOR fiRkS �—.<?..ev. de-T, BOARD/COt 1ISSICN/CCMMI TE' DATE: g/Z 0, 1 '_�NA : /t//ek 1�,I.tY>lyIto /2 ICI ktei- TELEPHONE: ygo7/r—g yy (home) 94.- - ii/o (ofi, ADDR SS: /,',_tS a�� /—~ /7,(.7 ZIP CODE: • 252Ze OCCUPATION. 72�rito,- �2 /P-se, -� (if retired; please indicate former occupation or protession) � � � EDUCATION: ,// �'d.s. 'l�r/� -c / �/'� �i�lZl1/IX. S7`/� / �, �/[2GL PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTI':ITIF.S 2Zd/124* e%> Svc ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one rime unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Rev_ced 6/ 19/SI 1; :1C'.lrt2 OL r,Jr11Cant iC01 ,' C,(iH I,^,AnO :OLD • A?AC, _� „•��7 r j GDI7/"N•11 Ac-.-.n ..... . ... _ "- HE J.. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES n ?0)1\j7r) \-fUll' ITEM # 0 MEETING OF qv f\ : / /✓ l `� MOT I ON BY, (w� SECONDED BY — , YES NO ABSTAINED JCOUNCILMAN JIMENEZ .•. COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL i COUNCILMAN EIDSON v COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL UNANI"" US I IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ink ITEM NO. 17 I MOVE THAT lilt v i OVIA BE APPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. • rryp.CHs✓o U va ,l/ J►y z 14) Z0NP COity et C94pache 09unction MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM: /C3DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: AUGUST 26 , 1986 SUBJECT: LEASE FOR PROSPECTOR PARK CONCESSION Since the completion of the Concession Building at Pros- pector Park, staff has investigated several alternatives for its operation. We feel the best suited operation not only for the City but also for the park users would be a lease arrange- ment with the private sector. In this case, the City would solicit bids from interested vendors , and make a selection based on the percentage of monthly gross sales which will be payed to the City. �► Attached is a rough draft of the proposed specifications for your review. It is recommended that authorization be given to the Director of Community Services through the Acting City Manager to solicit bids for the operation of the Conces- sion building at Prospector Park. Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 SPECIFICATIONS AND PROPOSAL FORM FOR CONCESSION AT PROSPECTOR PARK ,..� 3015 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 Instruction to Proposal Applicants All proposals must be submitted on the proposal form. The City of Apache Junction reserves the right to reject any and/or all proposals. The Apache Junction City Council will make the award and their decision shall be final. Each applicant will state the percentage of monthly gross sales which he will pay to the City as considera- tion for said Concession Agreement . Any consideration payable to the City shall be in addition to any trans- action privilege ( sales ) tax normally payable to the City. ,i.,. Specifications 1. The terms of the Concession Agreement shall be through December 31, 1987 . 2 . The Concession Agreement shall provide that the Successful Applicant shall hold the City of Apache Junction harmless from any and all liability and shall maintain public liability insurance. In this regard, the Successful Applicant agrees to secure public liability insurance in a Company agreeable to the City and in the amount of and that the City of Apache Junction be named as an additional insured, thus insuring the City against liability for expense that may be incurred by reason of any accident to any person or persons arising from or in any way growing out of the use of the premises by Successful Appli- cant . 3 . The Concession Building is located at Prospector Park, 3015 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Az . 85219 . Utilities will be provided and paid for by the City. All other equipment must be supplied by the applicant . 4 . The Successful Applicant shall submit in writing the prices of any article sold on the premises for approval by the Community Services Director and shall not sell any article or item that has p not been approved. 5 . The Successful Applicant shall maintain business hours at the park when in operation for City sponsored programs, and shall be open any time when asked for special events. In such case, the Community Services Department will notify the Successful Applicant 24 hours in advance of special event . Business hours may be increased, if desired by the applicant . 6 . The Successful Applicant shall provide periodic policing of Concession area, remove all trash to trash containers , as approved by the Community Services Department . 7 . The Successful Applicant shall remit statements and monies to the City on a monthly basis. 8. The Successful Applicant shall pay to the City on or before the 10th day of each month, the monies owed to the City. 9 . The Successful Applicant shall provide a soft drink and confectionary concession with hot/cold sandwiches optional. 10 . The City shall have the right to inspect and audit the books and accounts of the Successful Applicant including cash receipts . 11 . Should the Successful Applicant at any time be in default in the payments to the City as herein above set forth, or should there be any other default or breach occurring in any of the covenants promises, undertakings, agreements, or obligations set forth in the agreement , the City at its option may terminate the agreement and may enter upon said premises whether with or without process of law, and remove all persons therefrom and with- out the necessity of any notice or demand whatso- ever, all interest under said agreement of the Successful Applicant therein, whether in law or in equity, shall immediately cease and terminate. 12 . The City has the right to teminate the Concession Agreement on or after July 1, 1987 . If the City elects to terminate the Concession Agreement , it shall give to the Successful Applicant at least 30 days notice of intention to terminate, which notice shall be mailed by certified mail, return re- ceipt requested, to the last address furnished by the Successful Applicant . The notice shall specify a date not earlier than 30 days from the mailing thereof on which the agreement will termi- nate. 13 . It is further understood and agreed that the reme- dies herein set forth are not exclusive and the City may pursue any additional or other remedies provided by law. In the event suit shall be brought by the City for the unlawful retention of the premises , or for the breach of any covenants, terms or conditions to be contained in the agree- ment on the part of the Successful Applicant to be kept and performed, Successful Applicant agrees to pay the City an additional amount equal to reasonable attorney' s fees which should be fixed by the court in such action. 14 . Successful Applicant must comply with all appli- cable Federal, State, County and City Laws, ordi- nances and regulations governing this activity. 15 . Successful Applicant must comply with all Pinal County Health Department regulations governing this activity. APPLICANTS ARE REQUIRED TO USE THE ATTACHED FORM IN SUBMITTING PROPOSAL. DATE APPLICANT CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PROSPECTOR PARK CONCESSION PROPOSAL FORM We propose to furnish you with a service contract for the City of Apache Junction Prospector Park Concession per your Request for Proposal, as follows . Prospector Park Concession This bid is subject to acceptance for days. By signing below, bidder certifies that he has read understands , and will faithfully execute the terms and conditions stated herein. Vendors are cautioned to verify their proposals prior to submission as the City cannot be responsible for bidders errors or ommis- sions . Any proposal that has been accepted by the City may not be withdrawn by the vendor. The City of Apache Junction reserves the right to require a performance bond from the Successful Bidder. Firm Signature Address By ( Please Print ) City, State, Zip Title Phone Date ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • #k; )‘ ITEf1 # tC:( f1EETING OF MOTION BY : c ,,611n 11) SECONDED BY: TW11. Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL J COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL I UNANI1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL / Imikk .^ Amilk oomilk ITEM NO. 18 I MOVE THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES, THROUGH THE ACTING CITY MANAGER, TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CONCESSION BUILDING AT PROSPECTOR PARK. ( cHE: G/C V At, 1 R. yiri z "IR/ZoNP (=Oits o c4pache 2unction Agenda Approved by /t't-" Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS Old Business THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER New Business 9�,47 /2 Postponed Item FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE : AUGUST 26, 1986 SUBJECT: FIVE YEAR PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN Enclosed in your packet is a recommended "Five Year Parks Improvement Program" for the City of Apache Junction as prioritized by the Parks and Recreation Commission . The Commission unanimously approved this plan at their regular meeting in June . Included in this document are the major issues facing parks and open space availability , an inventory of existing facilities , a classification system, proposed standards for development and possible methods of financing . Also included are nine prioritized projects , and a Five Year development plan to accomplish these projects . This document will provide the City Council , Parks and Recreation Commission and Community Services Department Staff a series of park and open space priorities for integration into an annual capital improvements budgeting process upon which expendi— tures for public facilities can be based . It is recommended that the "Five Year Parks and Open Space Plan" be approved . Your consideration of this request is appreciated . 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 FIVE-YEAR PLAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FOR FISCAL YEARS 1986-1987 THROUGH 1990-1991 City Council Parks and Recreation Commission Mayor - Norman S . Hill Chairman - John Granillo Vice Mayor - Jim Bakkedahl Vice Chairman - Michael Carden Councilman - Jimmy Eidson Secretary - Lois Broman Councilman - Frank Jimenez Member - Chuck Heermans Councilman - Mari Gardner Member - Paul Miller Councilman - Ilene Taylor Member - James Appler Councilman - George Baljo Member - Judd Williams Member - Janice Pelson PREPARED BY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AUGUST 1986 �► TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction And Purpose Page 1 Key Issues Page 1 Inventory Page 3 Classification System Page 5 Standards And Criteria Page 7 Methods of Finance Page 9 5—Year Program Page 12 Proposed Improvements Page 13 FIVE-YEAR PLAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Introduction This document is the result of several months of study by the City of Apache Junction ' s Community Services Department and Parks and Recreation Commission. Much consideration was given to input provided by our community residents. Purpose The Parks and Open Space Plan is intended to provide the means by which the City of Apache Junction can plan and coordinate the development of a comprehensive recreational program for the City to serve existing as well as newly developing areas. This program will include acquisition , development and improvements of both conventional as well as innovative specialty recreational facilities designed to serve the citizens of Apache Junction through 1991 . This document will provide the means for the City to plan and coordinate a growth-oriented , long-range recreational program that is consistent with the intended development patterns for the City , and that builds upon the existing recreational facilities currently available in the City . The Parks and Open Space Plan will also provide the City Council , Parks and Recreation Commission and Community Services Department Staff with a series of park and open space priorities for integration into an annual capital improvements budgeting process which expenditures for public facilities can be based . Key Issues The following has been identified as the major issues related to the existing parks and open spaces available to our community : 1 . There is strong interest in providing additional park and open space opportunities in the City of Apache Junction including . *Neighborhood Parks *Swimming Pool `Regional Parks *Equestrian/Pedestrian Parks ON ON 2. Development of community and specialty parks should be pursued to provide new and expanded recreational opportunities not currently available in Apache Juntion. 3 . It is essential to continue to make improvements and to carefully maintain the existing park program in Apache Junction . 4 . It is important to further landscape and provide aesthetically pleasing parks and facilities to increase usability . CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PARKS, OPEN SPACE, RECREATION FACILITIES INVENTORY Veteran' s Memorial Park Size 2 Acres Location 1001 North Idaho Road Facilities Gazebo Uses Weddings , Memorial Services, Special Events. City Hall Complex Park Size 2 . 5 Acres Location 1001 North Idaho Road Facilities Playground ( swing , slide , tumblegym, etc . . . ) Sand Volleyball Court . Uses Pre-School recreation program, children of City Hall visitors , private groups Little League Field Size 3 Acres Location 1700 West Broadway Facilities Baseball Field and Concession Stand Uses Little League Baseball Program , Women ' s Softball Program, Private group rentals . City/School Recreation Complex Size 10 Acres Location 817 West Southern Facilities Swimming Pool , Tennis Courts ( 3 ) , Baseball Field , Racketball Courts ( 2) , Open Playfield . Uses Very heavily used since it is the only recreational area in this community offering a variety of activities . ow ow Prospector Park Size 265 Acres Location 3015 North Idaho Road Facilities Ballfields ( 2) , Picnic area , Concession/Restroom Building and future development Uses City sponsored Softball Programs , Little League Baseball Programs , Private group rentals . Planned is a thirty acre action recreation complex featuring many activities . Equestrian Trail/Open Space Size Approximately 1 , 600 Acres Location Surrounds our community to the north and east . Facilities Undeveloped Uses Plans include the development of an equestrian trail system, plus the preservation of several HoHoKam Indian Archaeological Sites. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR APACHE JUNCTION PARKS & OPEN SPACE Vest Pocket or Miniparks These are usually vacant lots converted to recreation use. The size and location of such a park are determined more by the availability of vacant space than by any other factor. Design is usually based on needs of the immediate neighborhood. Vest pocket or miniparks may feature childrens play areas , quite game areas , landscaping and some sport activities such as multipurpose courts, if space allows . Neighborhood Parks Area of intense recreational activities such as field games , court games , crafts , playground apparatus area, skating, picnicking, etc. If possible the neighborhood park should adjoin the public elementary schools , and serve a total population range of 2 , 000 upwards . Community Parks The community parks supplement the neighborhood parks in providing the near-at-hand recreation facilities needed by the urban population. These larger sites should, if possible, adjoin the public junior or senior high schools . They also encompass the activities included in the playfield. While the neighborhood sites should be designed to attract and serve the entire neighborhood populations , there are certain recreation facilities needed which require more space than the neighborhood sites should accomodate. Thus , the need for a community park. These other facilities may include a tennis complex, aquatic facilities , multipurpose courts , community center, adequate off-street parking, etc. Parks of this type should be easily accessible and should be within three miles of those serviced. Special Use Parks Areas for specialized or single purpose recreational activities, such as golf courses, nature centers , marinas , zoos , gun ranges or areas that preserve, maintain and interpret buildings , sites and objects of archaeological significance. Service area, desirable size, population served, all depend on type of special use. Linear Park Area developed for one or more varying modes of recreational travel, such as hiking, biking, horseback riding, etc. . . Linear parks are usually developed as natural corridors , such as utility rights-of-way, bluff lines , vegetation patterns and roads . 5-YEAR PLAN PARKS & OPEN SPACE STANDARDS & CRITERIA Standards When considering current and future parks and open space needs , standards are commonly used as guidelines . These guidelines often become absolutes and do not consider climate, density, population differences or a community' s ability to implement these standards . Nevertheless, park development standards can provide a benchmark useful for further analysis . For example, to give an idea of how Apache Junction compares in general for the population served, a commonly accepted standard suggests that 10 acres of park land should be provided for every 1 , 000 people. Using the current City population of approximately 15 , 000 as a base, Apache Junction should presently have 150 acres of developed park land. At the present time, however, the City has only approximately 17 . 5 acres of developed park land. On the other hand there are approximately 1 , 865 acres of developing or undeveloped parks and open space land which includes the Equestrain Trail and Prospector Park. So when applying the 10 acre per 1 , 000 population standard, it would appear the Park and Open Space acreage is sufficient for many years to come, providing development occurs . One significant problem that exists with the current parks and open space acreages is the location of these lands. Currently, our developed or developing parks are large, community type facilities and are not within walking distance for a majority of residents . Criteria When providing new or improving existing parks and open spaces in Apache Junction the following minimum criteria will be considered. Since no two communities or neighborhoods have the same needs , no requirement is needed that mandates exactly similiar development standards for all situations or populations groups . Local community input should be sought on all recreational facility development and the following criteria should be generally considered. * All parks and open space areas should be designed to reflect the needs , of people in the area being served. it a► * Development plans should be feasible and realistically attainable within the projected implementation period with existing or projected available funding. * Development projects should be consistent with and compliment other adopted municipal plans and should be coordinated with other municipal improvement projects through a capital funding program carried out on an i. annual basis. * Development projects should take into account the con- temporary requirements of energy and water conservation and be designed to facilitate long-term and efficient management and maintenance. * Development projects should generally be developed to serve specific geographic areas or user groups , as defined by the Parks and Open Space Classification Plan. p METHODS OF FINANCE General Fund Appropriation In most cities the current operating cost of leisure services agencies are financed in an annual budget by a legislative appropriation from the general fund. The general fund is the respository into which most of the City' s income goes . This fund is used to finance general government services . It does not contain any revenues earmarked for specific projects or services . The annual budget is prepared by the City executive officer from departmental request and is then presented to the legislative body for consideration, amendment and adoption. This budget preparation process affords the executive officer and annual opportunity to establish priorities of municipal services and to allocate the available financial income of the locality to the support of each of these services . Under this process each department must justify its existence on the record and must provide definite programs of service for consideration by the executive officer and legislative body. The amount of money that is finally appropriated for parks and recreation will, therefore, depend on the worth and merit of the services in the eyes of the executive officer, the legislative body and the community at large. Special Taxes Some communities create special taxes for, or earmark a portion of special taxes for, the support of parks and recreation. These special taxes are usually in the category of nonproperty taxes and are earmarked by specific legislative '"*" action. Taxes of this nature may be specifically designated for capital improvements or may be earmarked for general operation of parks and recreation department. Examples include cigarette tax, amusement tax and utility tax. Bond Issues Bonds are interest-bearing obligations of the city government which must be authorized by the legislative body and by a vote of the general public. Once authorized, the bonds are sold through commercial channels to investors . The proceeds therefrom, are utilized for capital expenditures in acquiring real estate, developing facilities , and constructing buildings. There is a legal requirement restricting the amount of debt a City may incur. There are two major classifications of bonded indebtedness which may be incurred by cities . There are general obligation bonds and revenue bonds . A general obligation bond is a charge against city revenue and is backed up by the "full faith and credit" of the city government. A revenue bond is backed by the income generated by a facility ( such as fees paid for use of a golf course) . Many revenue bonds are backed only by the revenue produced by the facility or enterprise; some are secondarily backed up by the full faith and credit of �► the city government. Grants-In-Aids The federal government and some state governments have programs of grants-in-aid to municipalities for a variety of purposes . Included in these public purposes are, for example, the acquisition and development of open space, conservation, urban beautification, and other parks and recreation activities . Grants-in-aid of this nature usually require matching of the grant by local funds . The type of grants , the percentage of funds involved, and the purpose for which funds may be used vary from year to year and from state to state. Consideration of possible grants-in-aid must always be predicated on the availability of local funds to pay the proportionate share required. Furthermore, very few grants are ever made to defray operating and maintenance costs . Therefore, once a grant is accepted and the facility developed, the cost of maintenance and operation is always a charge against the local budget. Gifts Historically, the parks and recreation movement has been extremely fortunate in receiving gifts that have materially aided in the acquisition of facilities and the operation of special programs . The number of such benefactions has dimished over the years , but gifts are still made, and the opportunity to receive this type of financial support should never be overlooked. Gifts may be classified as general and special. A general gift would be the donation of a sum of money without restriction as to its use. A special gift would be a donation of a sum of money carrying specific instructions as to its use and possibly some requirements for a continuing committment on the part of the local government. Concessions It has been increasingly common for public agencies to extend specialized services and to increase income by granting the privilege to private individuals or groups to sell commodities or services or public property. This privilege, known as a concession, should be based on a written contractual agreement between the City and the concessionaire. The contract should clearly define the relationship between the City and the concessionaire on all facets of the prepared operation, including financial benefits to the municipality. Leases There have been many instances in which public land has been leased to private individuals or companies with the commitment that a recreation facility be developed and privately operated. In some instances these leases , at termination, include a provision for reversion of the facility and the locality. The legal problems involved in leasing are varied. The problems of developing standards for design, construction and operation; the maintenance fees to be charged to the public; and the payments to be made to the municipality are all complex. No leasing arrangement should ever be made hastily but only after precise specifications have been developed. Lease/Purchase Agreement Similar to bonds the lease/purchase of capital improvements is an interest bearing obligation placed on a city, but does not require the general publics approval . Basically there are two concepts in which a municipality may purchase facilities or equipment through a lease arrangement. One, a developer finances and constructs a facility and leases the facility to the city until which time the city completes the agreed upon leasing arrangements . At that time the facility is solely city property. The other concept includes a private investor, usually through a financial firm, who pays for the facility initially and is reimbursed by the city through agreed upon lease payment. The lease/purchase of capital improvements is a reasonably new concept in parks and recreation improvement programs . 5-YEAR PARKS IMPROVEMENT PLAN PLAN PRIORITIZED LIST 1 . Prospector Park Improvements $1 , 500 , 000 . 00 2 . Complex Park Improvements 100 , 000 . 00 3 . HoHoKam Site Improvements 40 , 000 . 00 4 . Land Acquisition 120 , 000 . 00 5 . Little League Field Improvements 130 , 000 . 00 6 . Neighborhood Parks Improvements 400 , 000 . 00 7 . City/School Complex Improvements 150 , 000 . 00 8 . Equestrian Trail Improvements 50 , 000 . 00 9 . Veterans Memorial Park 30 , 000 . 00 $2 , 520 , 000 . 00 Five-Year Plan Year 1 Year 3 Complex Park $100 , 000 . 00 Prospector Park $275 , 000 . 00 HoHoKam Site $ 40 , 000 . 00 City/School Complex $150 , 000 . 00 Land Acquisition $ 30 , 000 . 00 $140 , 000 . 00 Neighborhood Park $100 , 000 . 00 $555 , 000 . 00 Year 2 Year 4 Prospector Park $275 , 000 . 00 Prospector Park $375 , 000 . 00 Little League $130 , 000 . 00 Equestrain Trail $ 50 , 000 . 00 Land Acquisition $ 30 , 000 . 00 Veterans Memorial Park $ 30 , 000 . 00 Neighborhood Park $100 , 000 . 00 Land Acquisition $ 60 , 000 . 00 Neighborhood Park $100 , 000 . 00 $535 , 000 . 00 $615 , 000 . 00 Year 5 Prospector Park ( POOL) $575 , 000 . 00 Neighborhood Park $100 , 000 . 00 $675 , 000 . 00 Proposed Improvements Prospector Park = $1 ,500 , 000 . 00 To complete the active area of Prospector Park as planned, the following improvements and additions are required: Multi-purpose ballfields = $225 , 000 .00 Picnic Facilities = 20 , 000 . 00 Open Playfield = 60 , 000 . 00 Tennis Courts = 120 , 000 . 00 Racketball Courts = 140 , 000 .00 Basketball Courts = 35 , 000 . 00 Maintenance Yard = 70 , 000 . 00 Playground = 50 , 000 . 00 Restrooms/Concession = 100 , 000 . 00 Volleyball = 5 , 000 , 00 Roads , Parking = 115 , 000 . 00 Trails/Sidewalks/ Landscape = 60 ,000 .00 Swimming Pool = 500 , 000 . 00 $1 , 500 , 000 . 00 City Complex Park = $100 , 000 . 00 Improvements to include installation of sidewalks, security lighting, picnic facilities, park benches , playground equipment and landscaping. Also with the addition of the new Senior/Community Center improvements will also include a lighted multi-purpose deck, shuffleboard courts and horseshoe courts adjacent to center. Veteran' s Memorial Park = $30 , 000 .00 Improvements to include extension of concrete or irrigated turf around gazebo, installation of permanent seating ( bench type) , minor landscaping and security lighting. Little League Field = $130 , 000 . 00 Complete renovation of this field is required. Improvements to include new lighting, turfing and irrigation, fencing (with backstop and dug-outs ) , restrooms and concession and playground equipment. City/School Recreation Complex = $150 , 000 . 00 Improvements to include extension of irrigation system and turfing of area around racketball courts . Renovation of dug out areas , addition of restrooms and concession stand, sidewalks , playground equipment and two racketball courts . HoloRam Site = $40 , 000 . 00 Initial excavation to determine degree of archaeological worth. Equestrian/Pedestrian Trail System = $50 , 000 . 00 Establish and mark trailheads . Indentify trails and regulations with appropriate signs. Includes for the provision of water and shaded ramadas at trailheads . Land Acquisition for Neighborhood Parks = $120 , 000 . 00 The purchase of land in already developing neighborhoods is necessary to begin establishing neighborhood and/or miniparks that are within walking distance for our residents . Neighborhood/Miniparks Improvements = $400 , 000 . 00 These parks will feature childrens play areas , picnic facilities , landscaping, and some sport activities such as a multi-purpose court, if space allows. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES SO" (k r ty- L' ()A- ITEM II ( G� 0 MEETING OF lib MOTION BY : j)l)i\ j‘jiLlSECONDED BY: j)644-11 Y=S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER /V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL 1 MAYOR HILL j 1 UNANIM..OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL � p r,2 WILTIEJ ITEM NO. 19 I MOVE THAT THE FIVE YEAR PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS PRESENTED. (0,CI-IF 1 0 i I, Ili'� Ob' Z gR/ZpNP COity 4 C4pache 09uncteon ... MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER rn FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: AUGUST 26 , 1986 SUBJECT: FACILITY USE MANUAL AMENDMENT SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER Over the past several weeks the Community Services Depart- ment has had several request by community groups to use the recently completed Senior/Community Center. Since we have no policy established for the use of this facility, we are asking that you amend the Department ' s Facility Use Manual to include this facility. Attache is a recommended policy including a fee schedule for your consideration. Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing _ Old Business _ New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER Reservation Policy All request for reservations of the Senior/Community Center for activities other than City sponsored programs must be submitted in writing and contain the following information: 1 .Name of organization or individual making the request with business address and telephone number. 2 .Name of responsible individual, their address and phone number if different than above. 3 .A description of the activity including dates and times. 4 . If a fee is to be charged what it will be . In addition a detailed breakdown of anticipated revenues and expenses, and if a profit is expected where it will go. 5 . Proof of insurance with City named as additional insured. 6 . Send this information to; Community Services Department City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Az . 85219 General Information 1 . Reservation year is January through December. Requests will not be accepted until November 1st prior to reservation year. 2 .An organization or individual may not apply for additional date ( s ) until after the conclusion of the original request . 3 .Permittee may make a total of four ( 4 ) reservations per visit . Permittee may not apply for addi- tional reservations until after the completion of their fourth reservation. 4 .Alcoholic beverages are prohibited at the Senior/ Community Center. 5 .All fees must be paid at the time of reservation at the Apache Junction Community Services office. Make checks payable to City of Apache Junction. No refunds will be given unless one week prior notification of cancellation is given. Fee Schedule Clean up, damage, key deposit (refundable) $10 .00 Operation and Maintenance fee Activity room only $ 5 .00 per hour Kitchen $ 5 .00 per hour ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET61) NOTES r Q I iS ' ' 1‘)L547:::1) ...... . V IP A\ ,, 9,,,,, l' \ i t ► ? . 4) Ell s . i ) ‘)(\\\ lb, ITEM # X ' IEETING OF CI) r MOTION BY: TIN( SECONDED BY:--13 /r Y NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON 4 JCOUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ I COUNCILMAN BALJO J'. j MAYOR HILL UNANI"".OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED i TOTAL ITEM NO. 20 I MOVE THAT THE POLICY AND FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE OF THE SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS PRESENTED. ... ....... rAChE,, , tr.�"'' O U DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY s, :1, z '/R,ZONP 'Oily oe C pache cOunction W E McDANIEL irk August 26, 1986 TO • Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: r► The Director of Public Safety THROUGH: City Manager P.,/ SUBJECT. Vehicle Bids On August 18 , 1986 bids were received for two Administrative Cars , one for the Police Department and one for the City Managers Office . The bids submitted are as follows . Chapman Chevrolet . (2) Caprices 1987 $11, 856. 76 each Darner Chrysler-Plymouth (1) Grand Fury 1987 11, 634. 14 (1) Grand Fury 1986 11, 408 . 58 O'Reilly Chevrolet . (1) Caprice 1986 12 , 888. 49 (1) Caprice 1986 13 , 024. 49 Arnold Auto Center (2) Caprices 1Q87 12 , 235 . 00 (2) Crown /,// Victorias 1986 11, 800 00 Agenda Approved by 7- • Date Item a Consent Agenda — Public Hearing __ Old Business New Business i.r A.)f- Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 Honorable Mayor and city Council Page 2. August 26, 1986 We recommend that the City purchase two 1987 Caprice from Arnold's Auto Center. The recommendation is based on the 5% preference given to local dealerships and the 1-1/2% sales tax which will be retained by the City. oar Arnold's Auto Center also comes the closest to meet our specifications. The other bidder had several exceptions and/or higher prices on the units. WEM/ll PIN 0p,CNF ✓G Ills O/ i 20 '-I t 0 U ( � i:z r 'rt 14R/zoNP C ity o C pache �unctian POLICE SPECIAL CARS AUGUST 19, 1986 Those Present City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Company Name and Address Amount Bid Chapman Chevrolet (2) 1987 Caprice 1717 E. Baseline Rd. 60 days del. (tent ) $11856.76 (includes tax) Tempe, Arizona 85283 (each) O'Rielly Chevrolet (1 ) 1986 Caprice (imm ) $13790 68 (includes tax) 6160 E. Broadway (1) 1986 Caprice (imm. ) $13936.20 (includes tax) Tucson, Arizona 85732 (each) Arnold Auto Center (2) 1987 Caprice P.O. Box 807 (8 wks. ) $12235.00 (plus tax) Apache Junction, AZ (2) 1986 Cr. Victorias $11800.00 (plus tax) Darner Chrysler Plymouth (2) 1987 Grand Fury $11634.14 (plus tax) 837 W. Main St. 60 days Mesa, AZ 85201 (1) 1986 Grand Fury $11408.58 (plus tax) immed. /-- /e-tte-'aC- 6-x-ie-' Zi Kathleen Connelly /- City Clerk WITNESS: XVs, ice Q.L. on V. Clark Bill McDaniel Deputy City Clerk Director of Public Safety 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 PQ,ACHE .10 r ;rt • "IP/ZOt Vity C, 'pac!ae .0 unction BID NOTICE The City of Apache Junction is soliciting bids for the following: Two (2) 1986 or 1987 (new) Full Size, 4-Door Sedans Bid specifications are available at the City Clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona 85219. All bids shall be sealed and marked, "SPECIAL CARS". Bids shall be submitted to the City Clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, prior to 10:00 a.m. , August 19, 1986, at which time all bids will be opened and read as a matter of public record. State delivery time in definite terms; calendar days. Delivery time is a factor in awarding the bid. The City of Apache Junction reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive informalities. All bids are F.O.B. Apache Junction, Arizona, and must include applicable sales tax, but with no other documentation of title fees. For further information, please contact Administrative Services, Lieutenant Reed Cox, 982-8260. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk Published this 5th day of August, 1986. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 C190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 u1EJ&11111111k' 2 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY :ii!=.- .1::::''. RizoNP it o� e 2paclie �df 1Gnclzon W E McDANIEL ,art 1,i BID NOTICE The City of Apache Junction is soliciting bids for the following: Two (2) 1986 or 1987 (new) Full Size, 4-Door Sedans - Engine: V-8, 4-barrel oil cooler Wheelbase: 114" Transmission: 3 Speed Automatic Tires & Wheels: (5 Ea. ) Steel belted radials, P235/ 7 or 15, with 15" x 7" wheels. Alternator: Heavy duty 80 amp minimum, developing 58 amps at idle. Steering: Power Cooling: Maximum radiator available with coolant recovery system. Ashtray: Front ashtray with electric cigarette lighter. Deck Lid- Lamp in luggage compartment to be activated when truck lid is open. Horns: Dual Electric Mirrors: Left & right with remote control activated by driver. Seats: Power bench with cloth or cloth inserts front and rear. Radio: AM - FM cassette Glass: All glass fully tinted Windshield Wipers: Two speed electric Air Conditioning/ Heater: Factory installed, maximum available Rearview mirrors: Interior day/night Sunvisors: Both sides Seatbelts: Front - ieft & right with integral shoulder belts. Rear - three belts Window Controls: Electric, front control activated rear control activated Trunk Release: Remote electric dash mounted, independent of ignition switch Head Lamps: Quartz Halogen, highbeams Color: Tan or Light Blue Gauges: Oil Pressure, water temperature & amperidge Doorlocks: Power 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 °Homo Chewolet lsuzu 1717 E Baseline Rd Tempe, Arizona 85283 (602)838-1234 City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Apache Junction, AZ 85220 NOTE:SEALED BID Thank you for the opportunity to bid on your specifications due August 19,1986, at 10:00 a.m. Attached are the snecifications for the vehicle bid and the Price both per unit and bid-inclusive . We hope this is self- exnlanatory and satisfactory, but if you need any clarifications please call Brian Netzel ana 838-1234. We look forward to hearing from you with respect to this bid and also any future bids you may have for us. Sincerely, at7 ;=.. Prian N tzel Chris Oliver Fleet Sales Assistant General Sales manager ChevroIe1 Isuzu 1717 E Baseline Rd Tempe, Arizona 85283 (602)838-1234 FORE AL BID 2-1987 Chevrolet 1BL69 Caprice 4-door sedans, equipped with the following factory options: LG4 5.0 Liter V-8 *See Exception #1 IVIXO 4-Speed Automatic Trans *See exception #2 QHK P225/70R15 Tires, Stell-belted radials *See exception #3 56 amp alternator STANDARD Power Steering V08 Heavy-Duty Radiator Ashtray with cigre tte lighter luggage Compartment lamp DEALLR*INSTALLED Dual Electric Horns NOT AVAILABLE D68 Twin Remote Sport irrors C. .1 Cloth Bench Seat Power Seat NCT AVAILriBLE UD"6 Am/FM Cassette Stereo A01 Tinted Glass 2-speed windshield wipers STki;LARD C60 Air Conditioning Rear View P,;1z rors, Seat Belts, etc. Per specific-.:tions A31 Power Windows A90 Power Trunk Opener-Located in Glove compartment NOT INDLPLIDENT OF IGNITION S'iITCri TT4 Halogen Hi and Lo- Beams AU3 Power Door Locks EXCEPTIONS : 1 . V-8 does not include an oil-cooler. It is not available from Factory. 2. 3-speed automatic transmission is not available with the V-8. 3. P235 tires not available from factory- 7" rims not available from factory. Vehicle is equipped Nith 6" rims. SELLI7G PRICE PER UNIT: �11 ,1 "33.11 �l SALES TAX: 721.6 C TOTAL TER UNIT: 11 ,858.7 : TOTAL BID P:iI';E, TAX INCLUSIVE: ;23,71 3. 52Li) 0 44:0 ,11,6) a (-1-,g ACH F , ,, 5,)‘ Seh Z,l-1,77 . ‘(--ayd-j dipli k O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY V -ir:.',. ...„-:-... AlRtzONN Vitt' o pac/le 07unction WE MCDANIEL 5 m\ BID NOTICE r, The City of Apache Junction is soliciting bids for the following: `ASa S Two (2) t o(1987)new) Full Size, 4-Door Sedans - $(S f/S ,7 t 6 44 ` *Engine: V-8, 4-barrel oil cooler // ,e. /'ic 4 "Wheelbase: 114" 5 �o. —_---- Transmission: 3 Speed Automatic CI= rdoj/7.c/e fi- Gisu1-Tires & Wheels: (5 Ea. ) Steel belted radials, P235/ 7 or 15, 7� +a -� with 15" x 7" wheels. Alternator: Heavy duty 80 amp minimum, �f�, developing 58 amps at idle. - Steering: Power 5 -A. ___--, Cooling: Maximum radiator available with coolant recovery system. S4-W. ' Ashtray: Front ashtray with electric cigarette lighter. 1 S'0 ,4 D 4 4-1 A5 — Deck Lid: Lamp in luggage compartment to be activated when truck lid is open. 5 ! Horns: Dual Electric 5J ay-/q Mirrors: Left & right with remote control �7zw e T i< Q / activated by driver. � Seats: Power bench with cloth or cloth inserts front and rear. 339./.f k 4fr./ Radio: AM - FM cassette S4--,1 - - Class: All glass fully tinted S11--r( Windshield Wipers: Two speed electric 7((.(16� (+A-3 Air Conditioning/ Heater: Factory installed, maximum available Srf-o - Rearview mirrors: Interior day/night 5-1- Sunvisors: Both sides Stet , Seatbelts: Front - left & right with integral shoulder belts. Rear - three„.191,,,i,aSA . Window Controls: Electric, front control activated (740)- ---b SPL rear control activated Glovc hux wlow�k Release: y Remote electric dash mounted, independent �� -�( 'Kell°( of ignition switch -- Head Lamps: Quartz Halogen, highbeams N/ , Color: Tan or Light Blue -E P13 — Gauges: Oil Pressure, water temperature & amper_dge / `/ / n'-�, // ' -- Doorlocks: Power r 1CC1 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K APACHE JUNCTION ARIZCNA E5220 TELEPHONE(602) 952-6260 t kCC P7100,1 '.E*- ,Sv_e 74 i o:1/ / 1 ua&( .... // 4 Ar -r r- i p ACHE << OW,0 --..2,-67 ru DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Vr = Z 1PizoNP its o �paclie &unction W E McDANIEL ,/\ BID NOTICE The City of Apache Junction is soliciting bids for the following: _ zo.—(2) 1986 .r 1987 (new) Full Size, 4-Door Sedans - .P4 4 7��`,..-1 Engine: V-8, 4-barrel oil cooler Wheelbase: 114" /4 vveC-C. Transmission: 3 Speed Automatic Tires & Wheels: (5 Ea. ) Steel belted radials, P235/ 7 or 15, / with 15" x 7" wheels. • R/7:--C, 6161. Alternator: Heavy duty 80 amp minimum, developing 58 amps at idle. Steering: Power //i /?2. ?�uS Cooling: Maximum radiator available with -15 4//%rh ee31e .e coolant recovery system. -------7 Ashtray: Front ashtray with electric cigarette lighter. S Deck Lid: Lamp in luggage compartment to be activated � when truck lid is open. 8/ Horns: Dual Electric A:1 Mirrors: Left & right with remote control 5 ��r activated by driver. ;e16'/4-)/LI. „ y 0�,��✓. Seats: Power bench with cloth or cloth inserts et front and rear. �" 1 Radio: AM - FM cassette Glass: All glass fully tinted Windshield Wipers: Two speed electric Air Conditioning/ ']eater: Factory installed, maximum available Rearview mirrors: Interior day/night Sunvisors: Both sides Seatbelts: Front - left & right with integral shoulder belts. Rear - three belts Window Controls: Electric, front control activated rear control activated Trunk Release: Remote electric dash mounted, independent of ignition switch Head Lamps: Quartz Halogen, highbeams Color: Tan or Light Blue --____ Gauges: Oil Pressure, water temperature & amperidge Doorlocks: Power loci NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 TELEPHONE(602) 982-8260 , • 'r , r¢q` k% tY August 13, 1986 r :: - ,. _ jam (% _ ^c- - TO: ALL ZONE CHRYSLER CORPORATION DEALERS - • .' .-4. ..}�FROM: W. F. Rhein Zone Fleet Manager -,, t Subject: 1987 MODEL FINAL ORDER SUBMISSION DATE . -. r .Y` - Tor'assist Order submission plans for your fleet accounts, please be advised '.,' - that orders must be received by Fleet Distribution for the following vehicles on the date stated: r Plymouth Gran Fury, Dodge Diplomat, Chrysler Fifth Avenue `- September 15, 1986 Yi,,. L; )a L ��i•r J• .TY`a..-•sSr.,wyP _ _.. , r_4 y �:Y y44-; 1 •t w. •J4r� GYy1ET jJ c.: .•. - .`'� .. a"} s We of ,course no longer orders for Police or Taxi units or any special ii ? t equipment on Gran Fury, Diplomat, and Fifth Avenue. ,... .:....*:,,,t, ,,4 .-m„, ,4 y, - Please direct any questions to the Zone F-_! et Office, (602) 866-6030 k J '''' a _ 1 ey } h _ aM 1 r , aS - . _ " -m Wes: !r 4,, , : W e n .N�+l .� ...d�ic:3 Yi+a �'{�' i•.s-�� i +, _ _ - ,rim•',.t. $... 6-#t t a + S }i1 '#,..r I>--t. <Y1 •'� '.•, }f-};t .�T . WFR/q. smp k--*s t}ripek k ,t� 1 1 .c� .t r.„"q . ,:�� r�c a.. :�y1s��:,' � fk ,.,. c r•��*y� y�1.,yy_ ,- �'+`�'. r 4 V �j_, rr ¢ F34• A_j.a r v. tr' i�wr{� �' g i ' {'1'k j.3,{ • • 0y�,e { �!1 .h ';•. J' u ,.j3'+��. i . t� •try iti S P4, r� -�V/ N zil fY yt . )t .r.tsr�.�.� aft` s �": F: t , ;}�in`'..'�,,•,; r €T i'�. Y•. 1--4 b Yla-a! ' _l}PM?!, }1, x i a•• Y , a�Y.a k43 , .r f (i.• Sij•. + ►,y• a I.- b .. K Y !1" „,4, Yt 1,....t.-4•9 3.y rrs§t- �" 1 Yti b Y`Y� . • '.+.y <, 1. S •• �t t t r '•s - _ ,. t i w s �d`t- r ��,ai.... .ii. � - ' ! -t E 1 f+' 3'r¢y k r .1 ., 1' h !•)••P b ri Y 7.t'~`�'' ,s.,1 3.L t j! ♦+!p• A I.Y �' -" t Y M i tr . , 7 7^` 4•i l,'' . t '71f. +e.��,ey 11• 4.4 t } -- .ra t' 1/ • �v 1. • , S.'-.:!. !• :' t ,3 `.,.-,lk.,,5 SS - r_ _Y-,9 ft I 9- -i i� C -� ,, .:.-.L .l. - 1,1. -c 44,r•�•.y .., Vz'-y,.- r -.7'; y .• f' r3 ', +..- �•. Y�-�i T... a -c-,4• -{`^'r . • .mi - 4 ti S-_ "� - 4- .-_ > •-t.'+ - - Stem s' *r -+s3 xti� A aY !Ii.N.:' -M9'rdi .y# ''. k ,- t r - ''>'�'. -., .T..a 1" t -t x f' Rai 9 xS :e.$Y4,K+.�f,-44 ',.yr�.+A 2..- e-r N • _ wy.- .,. i" ` tRY 6+C'�C .•.v„3h,. 7t '°/ r'- :u1. P. :i cam, `y am,.�• i 1S. .4ue' ! - f Iry , -3.tr_4.1.1,-�.s. , . - .. x 3taias ti• - F y- $' 1100.3 - s ..�« _ .wL.s.. .0 •,- . -f .,.}- ii.+ -� • f t v a - 1s•Iar ±.i r _ = _nL = _ ..,1 •;Z ` - '' 0114 ADVANCE DEALER SNIPPING NOTICE 'AV moo" AUTOMOTIVE SALES DIVISION PLANT/POPT OF ENTRY SHIP TO DEALEP ZONE SOLD TO DEALER VEH. IDENT. NO. S.O. NO. ROUTE X ST LOUIS2 35058 69 35058 1P30B26P-9GX-559633 G-M8-BT158001 X39 125 SHIP TO' SOLD TO. DATE DARNER MOTO4 SALES INC DARNER MOTOR SALES INC 01-10-86 837 WEST MAIN ST 837 WEST MAIN ST MESA AZ 85201 MESA AZ 85201 SALES DESCRIPTION MFRS. SUGO. RETAIL PRICE COCE INCI DLR. PREP. MBL41 PLYMOUTH GRAN FURY SALON - 4 DOOR 10,086.00 PT4 GOLD DUST - CLEAR COAT A3K1 SEAT-CLOTH/VINYL BENCH W/C A R. NO CHARGE DGA TORGUEFLITE TRANSMISSION-3 SPEED NO CHARGE ELA ENGINE-318 C.I D - 8 CYLINDER NO CHARGE GAS GUZZLER TAX PAID BY CHRYSLER GTB MIPRORS-DUAL REMOTE CONTROL-CHROME 67.00 HAB A/C-AUTO TEMP CONTROL 812.00 JHA DELUXE WINDSHIELD WIPERS 53.00 JPA POWER WINDOWS 270.00 NIHM SPEED CONTROL-AUTOMATIC 179.00 SUA STEERING COLUMN-TILT 115.00 TDB CONVENTIONAL SPARE TIRE 93.00 /� TPG TIRES-P205/75R15-WSW-STEEL BELT RAD NO CHARGE VAY. VINYL ROOF - UNPADDED 185.00 YDH OWNER FOLLOW-UP YGE GASOLINE - 5 GALLONS 3TA GAS GUZZLER TAX 3T0 GAS GUZZLER CONSUMER CREDIT SUB TOTAL 11,860.00 014 DESTINATION CHARGE 475.00 /r 1 k STOCK NO. IGNITION KEY NO I TRUNK ICE( NO. S 0. WGT MFRS. SUO. RETAIL PRICE TOTALS I 3470 I INCL DLR PREP 12,335.00 • CHEVROLET 6160 EAST BROADWAY P 0 BOX 12828 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85732 PHONE 747-8000 TO CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION DATE AUGUST 14, 1986 1 001 N. IDAHO RD. BID NO APACHE JUNCTION, AZ. 85220 ITEM NO WE ARE PLEASED TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL QUANTITY I SPECIFICATIONS PRICE 1 1986 Chevrolet Caprice 4 door sedan Model 1BN69 Equipped as follows : 6 Way Drivers Seat Power Steering Passenger Recliner Power Brakes Power Door Locks Polyglycoat Blue Cloth 50/50 Seat Undercoat Tinted Glass Fabric Sealant Power Windows Power Trunk Opener Color: Light Blue Front Carpet Mats Inter : Blue Cloth Rear Carpet Mats Door Edge Guards UNIT IS IN STOCK AVAILABLE Intermittent Wipers FOR IMMEDIATE DELIVERY Air Conditioning SUBJECT TO PRIOR SALE Ilium Visor Mirror Twin Remote Mirrors Sport Suspension Cruise Control -- 13 7w. Zd-A-"I" 305 CID V8 Automatic Trans W/OD / z_e_i_./4yTilt Wheel Wire Wheel Covers P225/70R-15 Steel Radials Auxiliary Lighting Heavy Duty Battery ET ST Radio AM/FM Cassette Heavy Duty Cooling Bumper Guards Special Instrumentation Unit Price: $12888.49 Sales Tax : 902. 19 Total 13790. 68 SALES TAX 8 LICENSE FEES TO BE ADDED WHEN APPLICABLE PROPOSAL GOOD FOR 20 DAYS STOCX UNITS SUBJECT TO SALE PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE NET CASH UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED THIS PROPOSAL CONSTITUTES A PURCHASE ORDER WHEN DELIVERY DATE SUBJECT TO DELAYS BEYOND OUR CONTRO / d SIGNED BY CUSTOMER ACCEPTED SALESMAN Jim Wi 11 i z _A►►ROVED •'A4 - /' CUSTOMER K DATE CHEVROLET SERVING GREATER TUCSON SINCE 1924 CHEVROLET • CHEVROLET • 6160 EAST BROADWAY P 0 BOX 12828 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85732 PHONE 747 8000 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION DATE AUGUST 14, 1986 1 001 N. IDAHO RD. BID NO APACHE JUNCTION, AZ. 85220 ITEM NO WE ARE PLEASED TO MAK E THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL 2UANTITY l SPECIFICATIONS PRICE 1 1986 Chevrolet Caprice 4 Door Sedan Model 1BN69 Equipped as follows: 6 Way Power Seat Power Steering Passenger Recliner Power Brakes Power Door Locks Polyglycoat Saddle Cloth Undercoat Tinted Glass Fabric Sealant Power Windows Power Trunk Opener Color: Light Brown Front Carpet Mats Inter: Tan Rear Carpet Mats Intermittent Wipers UNIT IS IN STOCK AVAILABLE Air Conditioning FOR IMMEDIATE DELIVERY Ilium Visor Mirror SUBJECT TO PRIOR SALE Twin Remote Mirrors Sport Suspension ,fir Cruise Control ( ; 9`��. .-. 305 CID V8 Auto Trans W/OD Tilt Wheel Sz_66-86eA Wire Wheel Covers P225/70R-15 Steel Radials Auxiliary Lighting Heavy Duty Battery ET ST Radio AM/FM Cassette Heavy Duty Cooling Bumper Guards Gauge Package Unit Price : $13024. 49 Sales Tax : 911 . 71 Total 13936.20 SALES TAX & LICENSE FEES TO BE ADDED WHEN APPLICABLE PROPOSAL GOOD FOR ?n DAYS STOCX UNITS SUBJECT TO SALE PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE NET CASH UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED THIS PROPOSAL CONSTITUTES A PURCHASE ORDER *HEN DELIVERY DATE SUBJECT TO DELAYS BEYOND OUR CANT•0j I SIGNED BY CUSTOMER ACCEPTED Irf SALESMAN JimIli11i _APPROVED 1^ / CUSTOMER DATE CHEVROLET SERVING GREATER TUCSON SINCE 1924 CHEVROL.ET 2I7E6LeA,.."- • _. ARNOLD AUTO CENTER _ o o East Apache Trail at Apache Junction P 0 Box 807 • Phone 982-2831 APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 July 11, 1986 • RE• BID TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TWO (2) NEW 1987 CHEVROLET CAPRICE, 4-DOOR bET)ANS Enginez, 305 CID V-8, 4-barrel • Wheelbase- 116" Transmission: 3 Speed Automatic Overdrive Tires & Wheels- (5 Ea. ) Steel belted radials, P225/ 70R 15, with 15" x 7" wheels Alternator: Heavy duty 56 amp Steering: Power Cooling. Maximum radiator available with coolant recovery system Ashtray: Front ashtray with electric cigarette lighter Deck Lid- Lamp in luggage compartment to be activated when truck lid is open Horns: Dual Electric Mirrors: Left & right with remote control activated by driver Seats. 45/55 split power with cloth or cloth inserts front and rear Radio. AM/FM cassette Glass: All glass fully tinted Windshield Wipers- Two speed electric Air Conditioning/ Heater: Factory installed, maximum available Rearview mirrors. • Interior day/night ;• Sunvisors: Both sides Seatbelts: Front - left & right with integral shoulder belts Rear - three belts Window Controls: Electric, front control activated rear control activated Trunk Release: Remote electric dash mounted, independent of ignition switch Head Lamps: Quartz Halogen, highbeams Color: Tan or Light Blue Gauges. 011 pressure, water temperature & ampridge Doorlocks: Power Delivery time of approximately eight weeks dependent upon factory delivery $12,235.00 plus applicable sales tax (each) Az-n-v-L1 Low. it , I'at nolci Aut ' •-utet 11-66 Ink Amok ARNOLD AUTO CENTER 00 00 ''n'• �.� 0. o East Apache Trail at Apache Junction P 0 Box 807 • Phone 982-2831 APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 July 11, 1986 RE: BID TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TWO (2) NEW 1986 FORD CROWN VICTORIA, 4-DOOR SEDANS Engine: 302 CID V-8, 4-barrel oil cooler Wheelbase: 114.3 Transmission 3 Speed Automatic Overdrive Tires & Wheels: (5 Ea. ) Steel belted radials, P225/ 7CR 15, with 15" x 6-1/2" wheels Alternator: Heavy duty 100 amp Steering: Power Cooling: Maximum radiator available with coolant recovery system Ashtray: Front ashtray with electric cigarette lighter Deck Lid: Lamp in luggage compartment to be activated when truck lid is open Horns: Dual Electric Mirrors: Left & right with remote control activated by drivgr Seats. Power bench with cloth or cloth inserts front and rear Radio- AM/FM cassette Glass: All glass fully tinted Windshield Wipers. Two speed electric Air Conditioning/ Heater: Factory installed, maximum available Rearview mirrors: Interior day/night Sunvisors: Both sides ,p Seatbelts: Front - left & right with integral shoulder belts Rear - three belts Window Controls. Electric, front control activated rear control activated: A Trunk Release: • Remote electric dash minted, ir_c.e endent of ignition switch Head Lamps. Quartz Halogen, highbeams Color- Tan or Light Blue Gauges. Oil Pressure, water temperature & ampridge Doorlocks: Power This bid meets or exceeds the minimum specifications. Delivery time of approximately eight weeks dependent upon factory delivery. $11,80^ 00 ulus appllcab3e sal s tax (each) ktt. -e L,clell Arnold, Partn :ol d Auto center RO/L CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 v1) oNfrf' e. k‘\\ � v Sly ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 6' SECONDED BY: )4/1,A- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER W COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL r/ UNANI"^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 3 ON ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 04/))- t tij etr ITEM # ( 211 MEETING OF I2/ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED c COUNCILMAN BALJO V VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL v COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER rO COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL V 1 , UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL f2 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ei"d1P )1/4)-(.# i\Y/ t n, I ITEM # MEET I NG OF (11h LUAA SECONDED BY: P�OTIO�d BY . i - YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ t/ IL TAY COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HI L UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ,J 401.1.4 IMMIhr ITEM NO. 21 I MOVE THAT THE BID FOR TWO POLICE SPECIf8L CARS BE AWARDED TO I;;2t;;2?,S , IN THE AMOUNT OF lhot� • PQACHE✓G ` 2 #H • 0 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY '4141/Z014P' COit1 o7 c479ache cOunction W E McDANIEL /m August 25, 1986 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: The Director of Public Safety L2 /11 THROUGH: The City Manager W SUBJECT: Police Motorcyle Bids On August 19, 1986 two bids were received for Police Motorcycles. One bid of $8,514.69 was received from Harley Davidson and the other from Kawaski for a bid of $8,044.48. We are recommending Kawaski be awarded the bid. They are the lowest and most responsible bidder. WEM/ll Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Pub:i c Hearing Old Business New Business - . Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 ,p .•. rP el,,,,,*„. .. PQACHE ✓G k a .�,s U ijiitt,C $ Z Al - t`P Vity o paci e c 2unction RIZON POLICE MOTORCYCLES AUGUST 19, 1986 ~ Those Present City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Company Name and Address Amount Bid Kelly's Kawasaki 1987 - 45 days delivery $8044.48 (includes tax) 1423 S. Country Club Dr. each Mesa, Arizona 85202 Chosa's Harley-Davidson Inc. 1987 - 45 days delivery $8514 69 (includes tax) 617 S. Hayden Road (each) Tempe, Arizona 85281 $1800 guar. trade-in 2./a ;',/„.6.2,, a, Kathleen Connelly City Clerk . .--7/11 / ( V:a_AL, t,ori V Clark Bill McDaniel eputy City Clerk Director of Public Safety 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 " '~ r it 'IPIZQ P C6 lt2 c L/2vacI e ?Gncticn BID NOTICE The City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is soliciting bids for the following: One or two (1 or 2) 1986 or 1987 (new) Police Motorcycles. Bid specifications are available at the City Clerk 's office, 1001 N. Idaho Rd. , Apache Junction, Arizona 85219. All bids shall be sealed and marked Police Special Motorcycles. Bids shall be submitted to the City Clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Rd. , Apache Junction, Arizona 85219, prior to 10:00 a.m. , August 19, 1986, at which time all bids will be opened and read as a matter of public record. State delivery time in definite terms, calendar days. Delivery time is a factor in awarding the bid. The City of Apache Junction reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive informalities. All bids are F.O.B. Apache Junction, AZ, and must include applicable sales tax, but with no other documentation or title fees. For further information, please contact Administration Services Lieutenant Reed Cox, at 982-8260. , --/..t.,/,,A,,,,,.._., 60.----„,„..Z4 Kathleen Connelly, City Clerf Published this 30th day of July, 1986. 1C01 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZCNA 8522U 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 8002 taS APACHE JUNCTION POLICE DEPARnT BID NOTICE The City of Apache Junction, Arizona is soliciting bids for the following: One or two (1 or 2) 1986 or 1987 (new) Police Motorcycles. The motorcycle(s) proposed by the bidder must be capable of being operated with the rider having full control at speeds up to 100 MPH, and able to accelerate 0-80 MPH from a standing start in a quarter mile. The machine must be suitable for operation on all road surfaces commonly found in the State of Arizona - concrete, asphalt, rural and mountain highways, city streets, and freeways. The machine(s) shall be of such a design and configuration as to allow the rider to sit in an upright comfortable position. The machine proposed shall have dealers available in the Mesa or Tempe, Arizona areas who can do all warranty work, all routine service and repair, and supply parts as needed. A statewide list of available dealers shall be included with bid. Each motorcycle shall be deliverea with an operator's manual and necessary literature which a person using one of the motorcycles would need to properly operate and maintain the machine. With award of this bid, one set of manufacturer's service and parts manuals shall be delivered to the Apache Junction Police Department. All motorcycles delivered under this specification shall be of the manufacturer's current production model, completely set up and serviced. The manufacturer's standard warranty shall apply starting upon the date the Apache Junction Police Department places the unit in active service. Sufficient brochures, pictures, and data shall be submitted with bid so as to show equipment, trim configuration as a law enforcement motorcycle, qnd mechanical and service intervals. Bidder shall indicate compliance or exception to each of the following minimum specifications: 0.11 • c. tZ—z-. oF _ AP S X_ J 1"c:i c,..) o S Ft C/ j) L r l c,7 c 2_ AJ — 1R 19.86 l 0 O O !g -r'? jCR�✓R1Ai4( — �Oi�c� cTs`.iciec t, i 5 � 7 z C. P6 D � "d _-r — f I c. � —- 7 3'S 3 . S TAX C 9b Q To He Qr0 caS T e.o { Oi�l�L,2� 4/-5- PA' S XEcre. r vF j'u2crigS ozoE2 - — - Fr2>M — — - - - -- -- - /42r ze,s, - 11,4 Si411j 1 N c `` 1G tL/ .s It,4,",43A }t T c AA A S c. A L L.A Police Motorcycle(s) Biecification egNPg. 2 PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS WITH EQUIPMENT 0 Maximum machine weight - 800 lbs. Fuel capacity - minimum 4 gallons Road clearance - minimum 5 inches POWER PLANT 1000 cubic centimeters minimum 0 4-stroke with oil filter 2 or 4 cylinder TRANSMISSION, CLUTCH, AND DRIVE 4e, 4 or 5 speed constant mesh o Left foot heel and toe shift control Chain drive or belt drive Left-hand clutch lever control BRAKES Disc brake, right-hand control to front disc, right-hand foot control to rear disc. BODY AND FRAME Black color tubular 4 Solo police saddle-type seat, designed for lower back support, with real sheepskin cover Gas tank color - white, or white and black, (50% each color) Hinged footboards that fold up in case of contact with ground. Left-hand kickstand Folding service stand for upright position Safety bars front and rear of rider, extending beyond rider profile (chrome) . Rear fender bumper bar ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 12-volt system Wiring installed so as to prevent damage while macnine is in service. Electrical system shall be constructed or equipped so as to prevent two-way radio interference. Heavy duty electrical system for additional police equipment. oink Police Motorcycle(s) B^Specification Pg. 3 HANDLEBAR GROUP Left and right non-magnifying mirrors with gray tint or non-glare glass. ---50 Right-hand throttle with throttle lock. Left-hand headlight switch with high and low beam selector. --� Left-hand parking light switch. Left-hand horn button ,.� a Left-hand headlight high beam flasher switch Right-hand enforcement light switch Right-hand electric siren switches, momentary on and 7 H f 5` i rc,n s rocker lock on. No <0,4 q Right-hand engine start button I N 7CA•^'4SAKI 9vLILt Right-hand engine safety kill switch Windshield - impact resistant WHEELS AND TIRES Aluminum safety or magnesium safety wheels Tires mounted and balanced for high speed operation and of such design characteristics to allow the rider to maintain control and stability of the motorcycle in cases of "flat tire" situations. Tire will be the type that stays on wheel in case of flat. CONTROL HEAD Illuminated calibrated speedometer, 0 to 120 MPH in 1 MPH 1). increments, with resetable tripmeter. Tachometer to show Ask engine RPMS. Emergency 4-way flasher switch Headlight high beam indicator light Alternator indicator light Oil pressure indicator light Pursuit indicator light Turn signal indicator light ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT Whelen II motorcycle sealed beam strobe system to include � rear pole mounted strobe light with blue lens and coiled 1 power cord, pole and connectors, Y harness electric connector, universal power supply for motorcycles, par 36 front pursuit lights sealed beam strobe type one with red lenses, one with blue lenses. Police Motorcycle(s) Bidcification Pg. 4 ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT (Continued) Enforcement lights wired to be turned on with ignition switch off. Electronic federal siren, Model MCS-1/MC/MNC. Handlebar radio mount bracket suitable for Motorola radio control head speaker and mike assembly, when o installed not to interfere with speedometer or indicator light visibility. A^ Siren speaker to be installed with factory brackets on the front crash bar. Radio to be supplied and installed by the City of Apache Junction. FRONT LIGHT GROUP Headlight shall be of the quartz type H-4. o41, Amber turn signal lamps. REAR LIGHT GROUP Center red taillight and stoplight, 4" by 6" minimum. Combination rear turn signals, 4-way flasher, brake lights, right and left mount single facing amber, four 0. inches with chrome back. Twin right and left running lights, turn signal, 4-way flasher four inches in diameter, single facing red with chrome back. CHROME GROUP Safety bars. Exhaust pipes and mufflers. Fender bars and saddlebag brackets. Handlebars, clutch, and brake levers. Mirror bars and backs - black. SADDLEBAGS - TWO (2) EACH J �� White fiberglass, approx. 11 inches high, 7 inches wide, and 17 inches long (painted black fiberglass not acceptable) Top-hinged from outside with front and rear latches with locks. Appt_£ 3A-G-S o") �} ...1-3A- c PcLic ., c G ' Lf f1-v4iL N .34- /icK PL/?-f ;/ c Police Motorcycle(s) B:Npecification ^ Pg. 5 MISCELLANEOUS Tool kit with appropriate tools for basic operation and maintenance supplied for each unit. Three (3) sets of keys to be supplied with each unit. Rear chain sprocket to allow engine to run at less RMP's (approximately 34-35 teeth) Motorcycle cover capable of covering entire motorcycle including windshield. All motorcycles shall be factory set up as enforcement motorcycles. Electrical system must be able to support additional load placed on system by siren, pursuit lamps, radio transmitter/ receiver, additional rear safety lights, and emergency flashers. Consideration will be given only to those units with the manufacturer's authorized police package or to those units where performance data as well as performance competence exists relative to law enforcement use. * Est Pfflt.: i.q*I ' ..A,4, 1t .ti vs 4, _.. .".'`..-Of hosa s 1 arie Davids_ o_n inc a i .yy1 ry,T"�"y� -(�•h1A n'i ��-•�S'!FT•y f 1y, y� �Y �9'tl -�l +p •� ` �Sdu is ayclen` load HARLF�A��S�N empej: 1 4$5'-481 ., :` 4 i ojie :6Q,2 1394 04Q4 '. . ;' ;?e i1 , ,, Wa 3 fL ' IY-y...�• 0:ti ,„'� �` sS t '�. ig.;, �,,,,tY`, y� ' `s'� 'c'h a,* ,.. f r.' �'y"�.i,, T -.t, ;. " as.; I . ''�SC�" T_- ,e,i;*�'r I".; r •wy,,-.1V- � �t{r-..:4�t".:'''Y4 h i'ti}_ 'Na. /sk., August 11 , 1986 City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 Dear Sir, Enclosed please find our bid on the Harley-Davidson 1987 FXRP Police unit. Also enclosed is a listing of all the authorized Harley- Davidson dealers statewide. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Yours truly, CHOSA' S HARLEY-DAVIDSON, NC. "°."'" /---2- , / /2 -7 ere 2'l C.- L L am / erald C . Chosa, GCC:bc President encls . i m �,5 �.* a430,N;:t*'' ,�J.,jz� N + ter, ' J+' ,zr, ,,,�."•a.4.i ` -L" .,3=:+ S- k. �xri 4iya Alt K'^�e�h ' y,. �. • 'L „C.„,... ,osa s Harley-Davidson Inc. ,, ��L��r 4 „ �" ,+.1 t,t-.. t i i f 17 Sou�hayclen Road � � �' �;x N,iE tii .r W `. 3":c,, n 0., .; e.4., - ,y 3.4,' I`III 1 i�' 11,Ali 14 I '1 ;Tempe Arizona 85281` r i , =v- one 602 894 0404 , .., �- .'14 Itti*,' 4 ',Z4.'1, - *1,0‘, 1...i.:A• '''' Yr , ziff 41- , ,.., -- 44 4 , i P ,, y �� `,15 I V.. 4400* ® _ '1' -�•t p.y 3s v . :- 'v 'd z,ah g R r t v a '�; a ol, r 3 F,'Al ,s.' i, r t zyirrt- . - ,. a ,14, Amok BID FORM 1 Motorcycle, Police type as specified Harley-DAvidson FXRP 1 Whelen II motorcycle sealed beam strobe system, with accessories as specified $ 7995. 00 Sales Tax 6 . 5% 519 .69 Total $ 8514 .6.- Guaranteed trade in price as specified , applicable at the expiration of 50 ,000 miles or 3 years , whichever occur first. $ 1800 . 00 These materials can be delivered withi 45 days after receipt of an order. This bid is subject to acceptance for 45 days . Payment terms are: net 30 days . By signing below bidder certifies that he has read, understands and will faithfully execute the terms and conditions stated herein. The signer also certifies that he s an officer or duly authorized agent of the bidding firm with full power and authority to submit binding offers for the goods or services as specified. Vendors are cautioned to verify their proposals prior to submission as the City cannot be responsible for the bidder ' s errors or emissions. Any proposal that has been accepted by the City may not be withdr n by the vendo . CHOSA' S HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC. i/ ?y-t-er — CC- 617 S. Hayden Rd. Gerald C. Chosa Tempe, Arizona 85281 President 602-894-0404 8-11-86 `b. } ...N.+. K VA i'� '..�d2 it r�-a 'S 1 - t A 4 '0 K w� t «et ;� t Chosa's;liar ey- avidson4Inc . .�f_ . M�� ,, . ,i i ' ' ,.� f 7 Sout ; widen fload k t , '., ,� ,� '' ►f'. , HARLEI-DAVIDSON I '��"�hone �Q2 894 04t�4 „,„,..?. --,‘ -- 0 � ,�;;�- j�+ ,�A .�,,,,.. - ,-P"'It. ,.' i c� . .», . .- .+v..: °.. .. .,... +._"....,scp ,... :. •- �.� re '�. ._. ` +i7 .v,...ii"y4:spietis /\ Hartman ' s Harley-Davidson Sales 1025 E. Fry Blvd. Sierra Vista, AZ 85635 Flagstaff Harley-DAvidson, Inc . P.O. Box 183 Bellemont, AZ 86015 Harley-Davidson of AZ 5556 Grand AVe. Glendale, AZ 85301 Bike City Harley-DAvidson 234 E . Beale St. Kingman, AZ 86401 Harley-Davidson of Tuscon, Inc. 5205 E. 22nd St. Tuscon, AZ 85711 Chosa' s Harley-DAvidson, Inc . 617 S . Hayden Rd. Tempe, Az 85281 Hacienda Harley-DAvidson 918 Thatcher Rd. Safford, AZ 85546 Jim' s Harley-Davidson Sales 1981 Avenue B. Yuma, AZ 85364 I 1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES di C ITEM # 12/ MEETING OF J /7 r� MOTION BY: 0' 11V SECONDED BY: ,- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AmN cmmiLa ITEM NO. 22 � I MOVE THAT THE BID FOR POLICE MOTORCYCLES, BE AWARDED� � TO3 kp, , IN THE AMOUNT OF , N. PQA ' G'L 1Pizot.1P cOity C pache 09unctian August 28, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER re/ SUBJECT: SELECTION OF DATE FOR SPECIAL WORK SESSION At the August 4th work session, the council discussed holding a special work session sometime around the middle of September for the purpose of discussing a five year plan to address the water and sewage prob- lems faced by the community. The council may wish to select a date for this work session at this time or you may want to wait until after all council members are present so that the date is suitable to all. Please keep in mind that water and sewer are two of the topics scheduled to be covered at the Apache Junction Growth Conference in October. You may wish to wait until after that time to hold a special work session This item will be placed on the September 2nd agenda for your discussion and/or action. kmc Agenda Approved by �`- Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hcarmg Old Business 777 New Business J'=Y,? Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (07 C ITEM # MEETING 0 9 MOTION BY: -� SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BAI JO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL / V OPIN ITEM NO. 23 I MOVE THAT A SPECIAL WORK SESSION BE HELD ON ( D , AT (c% YT , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. it ... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1// ° ITEM # a MEETING OF 9 � POTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILMAN BALJO J VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON V MAYOR HILL UNANITMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL -, /'ik oak ITEM NO. 24 I MOVE THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M., AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. , ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M. , ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MAGISTRATE COURT OF APACHE JUNCTION COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORT July, 1986 FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Civil Traffic, Criminal Traffic and Criminal Citations INCOME: Fines $24,048.45 Bonds 4,365.00 Proffessional Service 905.00 Misc. 357.00 $29,675.95 EXPENSES: Combined State taxes $ 7,284.11 Bonds refunded 1,906.50 Jury fee 186.25 Fines refunded 402.50 Proffessional Service 2,046.00 Misc: 0.00 11,825.36 Net Receipts $17,850.59 FINE PAYMENTS OWED: FINED ASSESSED ATTY FEE ASSESSED TOTAL Fine Payments $116,684.49 $ 5,800.00 $122,484.49 Warrant outstanding 256,373.86 8,348.00 264,721.86 GRAND TOTAL $373,058.35 $14,148.00 $387,206.35 FINES PAID OFF BY WORKING FOR CITY: MAGISTRATE CUliI T OF Ai'ACHE JUNCI LUN COUNC1 L MEMBERS REPORT July , 1986 CIVIL TRAFFIC Pending Citations forward 160 Monthly citations issued 264 _ �_- TOTAL 424 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid - 203 Default Judgment 60 Adjudged Not Responsible 263 —y TOTAL PENDING 161 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC Pending Citations forward 742 Monthly citations issued 89 TOTAL 831 --- VINALI7FD I)TSPOSTTONS Fines paid 89 Dismissed ( court ) ( prosecutor ) 18 Suspended sentence or probation 0 Time served 0 107 TOTAL PENDING 724 CRIMTNAI, Pendi ne Citations forward 576 Monthly citations issued 76 TOTAL 652 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid 68 Dismissed ( court ) 1 ( Prosecutor ) 12 - Suspended sentence or probation 1 Time served 1 83 TOTAL PENDING WARRANTS Pending forward 728 98 Issued TOTAL 826 Warrants cleared 47 TOTAL PENDING 779 Amb. ink i PQACHE. fc. .1 ,,,_,I.,:-(5 U ,A,i,,. �: 0 z , iirii: gR,zoW" c6it2 o 04pache 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 27, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: KATHLEEN CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM: � CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of August 12, 1986. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's office. ,.•. CRN:J1 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 111”=.1r eniN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AUGUST 12, 1986 7 P M WORK SESSION ON AGENDA ITEMS AT 6 30 P M PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS Mrs. Conway Mr Taylor List in Plaig Mrs Davies Mr Jorgensen Office Ms Callahan Mr. Vanhoy Mr Vehon, Chairman Mr Nakagawa, Acting Executive Secretary Mrs. Reid, Staff Ms. Ortberg, Recording Secretary SYNOPSIS Agenda dated August 12, 1986 approved as submitted and Minutes dated July 22, 1986 approved with one addition PZ-25-86 recommended for approval PZ-24-86 recommended for approval PZ-28-86 recommended for denial PZ-29-86 continued to August 26, 1986 PZ-30-86 recommended for denial PZ-31-86 recommended for denial PZ-33-86 approval for reconsideration of this case prior to the expiration of the 12 month waiting period has expired 1 Roll Call Five members present with two absent as noted above 2. Mrs Davies stated she wanted it added to Item 28 of the Minutes to be approved that she voted yes but with reservations 3. Conway/Vanhoy M/S "I recommend that the Agenda dated August 12, 1986 and the Minutes dated July 22, 1986 be approved as submit- ted with the one change " Motion passed 5-0-0. 4 Chairman opened PZ-25-86 and asked for staff briefing. ili 5. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezo( from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Resiat,,,,e Zone He handed out and explained Exhibit A, which is a legal description and map of the land The applicant has withdrawn one portion of his land to be rezoned and is only concerned with rezoning the two parcels he wishes to sell 6 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 7. James Payton responded and stated his request. He also explained that he was not interested in rezoning Parcel A because he lives there and doesn't intend to do anything different with that piece. He answered questions regarding access 8. Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for staff's recommendations 9 Mr Nakagawa Stated that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site If approved, staff recom- mends the dedication of rights-of-ways as a stipulation Staff had no objections to the rezoning of the entire site including Parcel A. 10 Chairman closed this hearing to the public P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE TWO 11. Davies/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-25-86, an application of James Payton for his property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. Any stipulations or recommendations are 1. We will rezone to CR-2 (MN) as outlined in Exhibit OIMN A, excluding Parcel A 2. The applicant will dedicate the east thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. 3 Parcel A shall be adjusted to represent a gross 1 acres The reasons for this recommendation are. 1 It complies with the General Plan designation for the site 2 It is compatible with surrounding property uses Stipulation number 3 was added by Mr Vehon Motion passed 3-2-0 with Mrs Conway and Ms Callahan dissenting 12 Chairman opened PZ-24-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 13 Mrs Reid briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from GR General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District. 14 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 15 Ione Chovanec responded and stated she is the representative for Mr Casazza She answered questions of the Commission 16 Chairman There being no one to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for staff's recommendations. 17. Mrs. Reid stated that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site. Stated that quality is the critical issue for the development of this site as a city entrance If approved, staff recommends the dedication of rights-of-way as a stipulation. .�. 18. Chairman closed this hearing to the public 19. Conway/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-24-86, an application of Robert G. Casazza for his property described as, a matter of public record, re- questing rezoning from GR General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District. Any stipulations or recommendations are. 1 That we have a site development plan at the time of development. 2. The applicant dedicate the North fifty feet (50') and the West fifty feet (50') of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes along 1 with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at the intersection of North Meridian and West Lost Dutchman Boulevard The reasons for this recommendation are 1. It is in compliance with the General Plan 2. It is the highest and best use of the property. Motion passed 5-0-0 P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE THREE 20. Chairman opened PZ-28-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 21. Mrs. Reid briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District 22 Chairman asked the applicant to speak 23. Ruth Armsby stated she was the representative for this case and she answered questions of the Commission 24. Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor or oppos he asked for staffs recommendations 25. Mrs. Reid noted that this request does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site and that staff recommends denial She stated that staff had discussed with the representative the different zoning classifications. At that time, she was advised against a General Commercial District (C-3) classification and felt that any commercial classification was questionable If approved, staff recommended the dedication of rights- of-way as a stipulation 26. Ruth Armsby stated that she did not remember the discussion with staff regarding the commercial classification being questionable 27. Chairman closed this hearing to the public. 28 Davies/Conway M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-28-86, an application of Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, not personally, but as Trustee of the Marie Arnold Trust, Alan W. Kral, Trust it( Officer, for her property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. 2 It does not have direct access to U.S 60 and co'^ place a burden on the undeveloped dirt roads 3 It would set a precedent in an area of residential parcels and developed trailer parks Motion passed 5-0-0 29. Chairman opened PZ-29-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 30 Mrs. Reid briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. 31. Chairman asked the applicant to speak There being no applicant or representative present he asked the Commission for a motion to continue this case, since that was their desire. 32 Conway/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Commission continue PZ-29-86 to August 26, 1986 at 7 p m in these Council Chambers Motion passed 5-0-0 33 Chairman opened PZ-36-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE FOUR 34 Mrs Reid briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District 35 Chairman noting that the applicant was not present, there being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition, and the Commission desiring to go on with this case, he asked for staff's recommendations 36. Mrs. Reid noted that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site Staff does not feel that this would be in the best interest of the community to have small individual mobile home lots in this area Also, staff feels that this would be considered spot zoning and would set a precedent, as properties in the neighborhood are la acres with one mobile home If approved, staff recommends the dedication of rights- of-way as a stipulation. 37. Chairman closed this hearing to the public. 38 Conway/Callahan I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-30-86, an application of Albert and Judith Folsom, and Daniel and Carolyn Rafferty for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning of Parcel No. One from GR General Rural to CR-2(MH) Single Family Residence Zone and of Parcel No Two from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 It will set a spot zoning precedent 2. It is not in the best interest of the City. 3 With the increase of traffic, we don't need it right there in that area Motion passed 5-0-0. 39. Chairman opened PZ-31-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing. "oak 40 Mrs Reid briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence. 41 Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 42. Harold Englin responded and answered questions Stated he is desiring to purchase this property and then to split it, and rent the two back lots. He answered questions especially about access He intends to put a private access road in 43. Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor, he asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. 44. Harvey Morrison stated he's not against development, but he's concerned about the upkeep of the property, especially weed growth and water retention 45. Chairman asked for staff's recommendations. 46 Mrs. Reid stated that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site If approved, staff recom- mended the dedication of rights-of-way as a stipulation vn! P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE FIVE 47 Harold Englin responded to Mr. Morrison's concerns by stating that they are in the process of cleaning up the area. Also, the wash is not intentionally barricaded. 48. Chairman closed this hearing to the public 49 Conway/Davies M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-31-86, an application of Virginia Wilson for her property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Fa Residence Zone. F , The reason for this recommendation is: 1 I cannot feel comfortable with private access roads. Motion passed 4-1-0 with Mr. Vehon dissenting 50. Chairman called for a ten minute recess. reconvened at 8 55 p m Under Other Business, he opened PZ-33-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 51. Mr. Nakagawa stated this is a request for the Commission to reconsider a denied rezoning application prior to the expiration of the 12 month waiting period as required by the Zoning Ordinance (Section 13.0110) if in the opinion of the Commission there is a change of circumstances that would warrant consideration of a new application for amendment. 52. Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 53 Steve Pappas responded and stated his request 54. Chairman there being no one wishing to speak and staff having no further input, he closed this hearing to the public 55 Commission discussed with staff the water retention problems 56 Conway/Vanhoy M/S "I move that we approve for reconsideration PZ-33-86 as per the map we have in our books because it might save the new owner 6-8 weeks He is apparently going to apply, so we might just as well let him apply now eiN and if we approve it, then he can save money Motion passed 3-2-0 with Ms Callahan and Mr. Vehon dissenting. Ms Callahan noted that her vote has nothing to do with how she feels about the land itself, but feels that saving money is not a change in circumstance She stated that the 12 month waiting period is in the Zoning Ordinance for a reason, therefore she voted no 57. Chairman Also under Other Business, he asked for the staff's briefing regarding the Commission Initiatives 58 Mr Nakagawa Stated that regarding private drives and mobile home sitings, this is the opportunity for the P & Z to authorize a Commission Initiative 59 Conway/Callahan M/S "I move we authorize a Commission Initiative to regulate location and improvement of private streets, and limiting of mobile homes to large lots, parks or subdivisions, and I suggest we set up a work session at the convenience of the Planning Commission and the Planning Department. Motion pased 5-0-0 e.--3 P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 12, 1986 PAGE SIX 60. Mr. Nakagawa Under Information and Reports, he stated that there will be a meeting August 27, 1986 at 7 p m in the City Council Chambers to discuss with property owners their input for zoning the recently annexed part of Section 33. He also mentioned the upcoming Annual State APA meeting in Tucson entitled "Urban Design" 61. Vanhoy/Callahan M/S to adjourn Meeting adjourned at 9 25 p m Respectfully submitted, dim akagawa, Acting Executive Secretary j 'Tony Vehon, Chairman I 3 PQp,CHE✓G O� ti0 z APRON% p ity o 4p ache unction � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 13, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGy: KATHLEEN CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER FRO jj . ( CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUB CT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1986 Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's office. CRN•j1 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 w— Adak Ask PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA JULY 22, 1986 7 00 P M ,^, WORK SESSION ON AGENDA ITEMS AT 6 30 P M PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS Mrs. Davies None List in Planning Mrs Conway Department office Ms Callahan Mr. Vanhoy i Mr Taylor Mr Jorgensen j Mr Vehon, Chairman Mr. Nakagawa, Staff Mr. Newcomer, Executive Secretary Mrs LeCount, Recording Secretary SYNOPSIS Agenda dated July 22, 1986 and Minutes dated July 8, 1986 - approved as submitted. PZ-25-86 - continued to August 12, 1986 PZ-27-86 recommended for approval 1 Roll Call All members present 2 Taylor/Vanhoy "I recommend that the Agenda dated July 22, [[ 1986, and the Minutes dated July 8, 1986, be approved as submitted " Motion passed 7-0-0. 3 Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-25-86, a re- AN\ fzoning from GR General Rural to CR-2(MH) Single Family Residence and asked for staff briefing 4 Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission on Public Hearing Case No PZ-25-86 5 Chairman asked if the applicant wished to speak 6. Mr. Gillespie introduced himself and said he intends to purchase a portion of the property and plans to renovate the house He has plans to have his mother live in the house 7 Commission asked several questions of Mr Gillespie concerning frontage, washes running through the property, and if he planned to rebuild 8. Mrs Conway asked Mr Gillespie why he was asking for mobile home rezoning if he was not going to put a mobile home on the property 4114""'" ! Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 22, 1986 - Page Two 9. Mr. Gillespie stated that he owns a 1978 mobile home which is in storage at the present time and would like to place it on the property. 10 Mr Payton introduced himself as the owner of the property in question and pointed out to the Commission on the map the location and approximate ogo` acreage he would retain after selling a portion of it to Mr. Gillespie 11. Mrs. Conway asked Mr. Payton why he was requesting mobile home rezoning 12 Mr Payton replied that he did not have any plans for more than one horse but that Mr Gillespie may have 13. Mr. Jorgensen asked Mr. Payton what his plans were for the travel trailer that was located next to the house 14 Mr. Payton said his plans were to sell it 15 Commission discussed the case with the applicants and felt they needed more information before a recommendation could be forwarded to the City Council They would like to see a sketch plan showing what portion of the propety Mr Gillespie is going to purchase and what portion of the property Mr Payton expects to keep 16. Conway/Vanhoy M/S "I move that we continue Case No PZ-25-86 until August 12, 1986 in the City Council Chambers at 7 00 p m." The motion passed 7-0-0 17 Chairman opened public hearing on PZ-27-86, a request for a rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-3(MH) and asked for staff briefing. 18 Mr Newcomer brief the Commission on the case 19. Chairman asked the applicant if he wished to speak 20 Mr. Gargrave introduced himself and said he was representing the applicants, William and Betty Osborn He said there is an existing mobile home and garage situated on an angle on the property in question. He said Mr Osborn does not need all of the property, and in order to utilize it, would need to get a similar type zoning i 21 Mrs Conway asked if he or Mr. Osborn intends to sell off Lthree pieces of the land 22 Mr. Gargrave replied that Mr and Mrs. Osborn live on a portion of the property and plan to sell close to two acres. �s Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 22, 1986 - Page Three 23 Mrs Davies suggested that the Commission view a site plan before any action be taken on this case 24. Chairman There being no one to speak in favor or in opposition, asked for the staff recommendation 25 Mr Newcomer explained to the Commission that the CR-3(MH) zone permits lot sizes of 7,000 square feet in subdivisions or 11,000 square feet if off-site improvements are not installed No intention has been made towards subdividing this parcel and the size would probably make that economically unfeasible Staff would recommend that the Commission consider as an alternative to CR-2(MH) designation which would allow 11,000 square foot lots and in that way we would have zoning and development in more relation with another. He said he would also like to remind the applicant that the creation of four or more parcels by an individual or a group of individuals acting in concert constitutes a subdivision under state and city laws and that certain lot splitting activity is regulated by the City's Lot Split Ordiance as of August 14, 1986 He said the request does comply with the General Plan density for the neighborhood if approved, staff does recommend roadway stipulations 26. Chairman closed the public hearing 27 Mr Taylor pointed out to the Commission that the applicant had asked for a rezoning to CR-3(MH) but had agreed to take CR-2(MH) which is 11,000 square feet. He said he is in a General Rural holding pattern and it appears that he is asking for the least and the Commission should not be so concerned as to what he plans to do with it He cannot do any more with it than our Ordinance would allow 28. Taylor/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-27-86, an application of William and Betty Osborn, represented by John Gargrave for their property described as a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2(MH), changing to CR-3(MH) to CR-2)MH) as we discussed Any stipulations or recommendations are 1 The applicants dedicate the North and South thirty-three feet (33') of the subject site for public roadway and associated purposes 2 If the property owners divides this up into more than three parcels they would be obligated to comply by the subdivision laws of the State of Arizona. WITMOP Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 22, 1986 - Page Four 3 Applicant show a sketch indicating how the property on which the mobile home is located will be split off from the rest of the site The reasons for this recommendation are 1 The General Rural designation that the applicant is in is nothing more than a ( holding designation and he is entitled to a rezoning. 2 It is the best use of the property." Motion passed 6-1-0 with Mr Vehon dissenting Mrs. Davies voted yes with reservations. 29. Mr Newcomer announced to the Commission that the Planning Department will have a new staff member as of August 4, 1986. He explained to the Commission the different types of grants which have been prepared by staff member Julie Reid 30 Mr Nakagawa Discussed with the Commission a memo given to them concerning the General Plan He hoped to set a date of September 3rd for the next General Plan meeting. A discussion followed Respectfully submitted, I • Charles R Newcomer, A'•cutive Secretary Tony Vehon Chairman immor ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES A / / �( - A e ITEM # "(41 , MEETING F Ffr 5ft MOTION BY: A SECONDED BY CTZ YES/ NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO �l VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL UNANITOUS ,[ IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 26 I MOVE THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P.M. ,..., 1°\ C ' 11 ill/ 11" . ROLL CALL , �� (j v ; Lr 1, v ROLL CALL I P ESENT ABSENT n W.S. W.S. (it..) MI-\YO vnr�. HILL ; i'l 4 / / VICE—MAYOR BAKKEDAHL � — . / / . COUNCILMANJIf4ENEl COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOP / / / ✓ t ! COU�1C I WOMAN GARDfVER � - COUNCILMAN BALjo I a i / COUNCILMAN EIDSON 1 TOTAL CP - - STAFF PRESENT W.S. CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly './7 ✓ { •-► FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis ✓ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Chuck Newcomer ;/// ✓ ' DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY Bill McDaniel ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman ✓/ CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch --b�. ✓ . ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph 1/// _ c,/( SUPERINTENDENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Jeff Bell v , DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY Pam Loui / V, ._..._---.-----.- CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK ? - Ll /1;7O� ( `� DATE:NAME: cj �- /� 5.' ADDRESS:AGENDA ITEM:P.n — 0 1 v CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION oak REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: l/A G -- LT 4,A:5 DATE: 2 e:Z ADDRESS: /3 G6e--p Fl&7� AGENDA ITEM• / / Z 0 t2 �� ....... ezz-7, -6- /.4_, Ri...acc., CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK j2X)AJ S fT�� DATE C /U n I=l 7- _, ADDRESS: //9167) AGENDA ITEM• C g Cc_ 7'0 t�L < /'X-, .- Am. CSA CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: DATE: " Z- ADDRESS: ‘Q 0 t - iLQJ t-NFv'CJ�1�t AGENDA ITEM: - C A Lt.-To TW �v�u� rw r CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ( : RE EST TO SPEAK NAME: DATE: ?�c72 —E,4 ADDRESS: �' AGENDA ITEM: b , ) 0 1006. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME C,L1 E Ce TY DATE: q 2 © 4, ADDRESS: O 3 Ac AGENDA ITEM: