Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 09.16 City Council Regular Agenda APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 N IDAHO ROAD, APACHE JUNCTION, AZ MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1986, 7 00 P M TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1986, 6:00 P.M. (Tuesday meeting only if required) Amok AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3 Discussion on agenda items for September 16th regular meeting 4. Discussion on proposed licensing of park and swap vendors (City Clerk) 5 Discussion on library landscaping (City Clerk) 6. Discussion on Ordinance No. 457 - Land Splits (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 7 Discussion on MH zoning (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 8. Discussion on designated locations for private access (City Clerk) 9. Discussion on speed limit signs (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 10 Discussion on City Code, Chapters 3 and 4 (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 11. Discussion on city hall security (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 12 Discussion on use of city vehicles (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 13. Discussion on employee political involvement (Councilman Eidson) 14 Calendar reports 15 Requests for future agenda items 16. Reminder of scheduled Executive Session Allak 17 Adjournment Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the city clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, AZ, Monday through Friday, 8 00 a m to 5 00 p.m., excluding holidays. Dated this 11th day of September, 1986 Ka`hlPen Connelly, City C rk r ( yp,CHE d F Jy � J.. '9RIZ0 . C 'it # o C4ac/ze &2unctian �` SALES TAX/BUSINESS LICENSE PARK-N-SWAP NUMBER OF RENTAL SPACES 950 MONEY COLLECTED FOR 12 MONTHS AT .50 PER SPACE $25,622.50 950 SPACES AT $45.00 PER SPACE FOR THE FIRST YEAR $42,750.00 EXTRA MONEY WOULD BE COLLECTED IF A SPACE WAS RE-RENTED. 950 SPACES AT $35.00 FOR THE SECOND YEAR $33,250.00 EXTRA MONEY WOULD AGAIN BE COLLECTED IF A SPACE WAS RE-RENTED. WITH THE LICENSING PROGRAM SET UP AND ENFORCED AT PARK-N-SWAP IT WOULD LET THE CITY CONTROL SALES TAX. AS IT IS RIGHT NOW, WE CAN NOT ENFORCE THE SALES TAX DUE TO NOT KNOWING WHO IS SELLING AND HOW TO CONTACT THAT PERSON. AT THIS TIME, WE ALREADY HAVE A TAX PROGRAM SET UP ON THE COMPUTER FOR PARK-N-SWAP. "k THE CITY HAS LOST A GREAT DEAL OF REVENUE OVER THE YEARS DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF SALES TAX BY VENDORS AT THE SWAP MEET. I rEEL WITH THE HELP OF THE COUNCIL AND PARK-N-SWAP WE CAN MAKE THE PROGRAM WORK. I AM SURE THAT AT THE END OF THE FIRST YEAR WE WILL SEF A GREAT DEAL OF REVENUE FROM THIS PROGRAM. PARK-N-SWAP IN PHOENIX CHARGES $12.00 FOR THE SALES TAX LICENSE AND $60.00 FOR THE FIRST YEAR OF USED GOODS BEING SOLD AND $25.00 EACH YEAR THEREAFTER. THIS FEE IS PAID TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX. AT THIS TIME THEY DO NOT CHARGE THE $60.00 FOR NEW GOODS. T001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002_ HErOiiaNC • '44 PIZONP ity C4pache cOunction OPENING DATE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PARK-N-SWAP SALES TAX INFORMATION BUSINESS NAME: STREET ADDRESS/CITY MAILING ADDRESS OWNERS NAME BUSINESS PHONE HOME PHONE STATE/CITY SALES TAX NUMBER SPACE NUMBER SEASON AGREEMENT TYPE OF GOODS MAKE MODEL OF VEHICLE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY ME AND ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE, TRUE AND COMPLETE. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (60Z) 982-8002_ Aank Ze) QACHF e) Z Zs 2 Z '1RiZONP `6'itj o 04pache 09unction September 5, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER =ems SUBJECT: LIBRARY LANDSCAPING Attached is a letter I recently received from Larry Enyart, the architect for the new library/senior center. As indicated in Mr. Enyart's letter, he has concerns about certain aspects of the library landscaping, particularly the queen palm trees located along the front of the building. I have spoken to Mr. Enyart with regard to his concerns and informed him that I would present his letter to the council for direction. Please let me know if you wish to have Mr. Enyart present at a future council work session to review his concerns with the project, or if you wish to let the present landscaping remain, or if you wish to form a council committee to discuss the matter and seek a solution. I will place this item on the September 15th work session in order to obtain direction. kmc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 LAWRENCE ENYART ARCHITECTS C, ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS LANDSCAPE 4 -< 5829 N 7th Street Suite 1-A Phoenix, Arizona 85014 602-263-8344 A. -*I cam, D� m N ='rn =< August 19, 1986 rnrn City of Apache Junction -' Kathleen Connelly / Acting City Manager Cr cD 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Re: Landscape for City of Apache Junction Library & Community Center Dear M G nelly, Please find enclosed a copy of the letter sent by this office to Mr. Gil Verley and a copy of his return letter. As stated in our telephone conversation, we are concerned with the over all design quality of this important project of which the landscape plays a critical part. The theme of our building and landscape plan was to be in harmony with the desert and the Superstition Mountains. As stated in our letter we were quite pleased for the most part with Mr. Verley's efforts. When asked by Mr. and Mrs. Verley, we made a few suggestions that we felt important enough to mention and sent our landscape plans and specifications (Charles Coleman provided Mr. Verley our landscape plans in February 1986) . The primary issue concerned the placement of Queen Palms in the tree wells in front of the building and the color of the decomposed granite. We feel the Queen Palms planted are inappropriate (Casablanca Resort Look) and detract from the overall natural desert theme of the building and surroundings. We feel that the proposed pink or red colored decomposed granite is unnatural and not in harmony with the natural colors of the desert. We also reviewed the master plans and landscape schemes prepared by Coe and VanLoo of the proprosed park and found the Queen Palms incompatible with the landscpape trees and plants shown on the Master Plan and the Library/ Community Center designed by our firm. We designed a complete landscape plan for the library and Community Center. We have been doing landscape plans in our office for over ten years and feel we have some experience in the matter. A lot of time and thought goes into designing a building and its landscape to arrive at a pleasing end product in the built environment. We take pride in our work and have a sincere interest in our projects from begining to the end. It is unfortunate that we must strongly disagree from the departures made by others on this important project, both from aesthetic, safety and maintenance reasons (leaf breakage in high winds, annual trimming and fungi spraying, skinning, seed pod droppings and dried flower sheddings of the Queen Palm) . Queen Palms can reach 50 feet in height and would be totally inappropriate to the scale of the building. We have expressed our concerns to Michael McNulty, Charles Coleman, Richard Broman, and Gil Verley. page 2 Since there is a difference of opinion on this matter by Mr Verley (a representative of the City?) and we were under contract to provide design services, and we were not consulted with departure from the natural desert landscape theme, it is perhaps important enough to have the City Council decide the issue. We are willing to help resolve this important issue. Should you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, C'kji°311111,11111:11?"11.11114.111 Lawrence Enyart, AIA enclosure LE/mp LAWRENCE ENYART ARCHITECTS fARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS LANDSCAPE 1+1 5829 N 7th Street Suite 1-A Phoenix, Arizona 85014 602-263-8344 July 18, 1986 Mr. Gil Verley 920 S. Palo Verde Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Gil, Please find enclosed copies of our landscape plan, irrigation plan and specifications for the Apache Junction Library & Community Center which we designed. As you can see from the plan we tried to design a scheme that would be harmonious with the surrounding desert and mountain vistas. We were pleased to meet you and your wife at the opening and want to again thank and commend you on all your hard work and extra effort. For the most part the landscape is attractive and in keeping with the desert theme. As mentioned at the time however, we feel that the Queen Palms placed out front are not in keeping with this theme. We realize that they were chosen for economic reasons to have a finished look for the opening. We would recommend that they be replaced with plants that reflect the spirit of the natural desert. They could still be used in a group in the court yard area for an oasis effect. We are negotiating to have them replaced with desert plants. In addition, for the decomposed granite we would recommend size 1/4"+ in bronze or gold color and spread at 2 to 3" depth. The ground should be treated to minimize weeds that will come through the decomposed granite. It has been suggested that we submit this project for a design awards program. We are anxious to see the final completion of the landscaping as it is an important part of the whole design focus. We would like to professionally photograph the building in the near future (after Queen Palm replacement) . Again, thank you and family for your dedication to this project. Should you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Lawrence Enyart, AIA LE/mp Rr= .t'' Ai.,, .. ' : Wit';toy SN- A ''//4 K l�r.Ar7fJIE,1T- ra"4-/ /',//Z t c j ✓'s''4G� Z-s Ti"-•F5" .4/ 4f, 188 Arecastrum—Artemisia .-" (wrv�wy • Climate Zones,pages roinro•••••••"...................„......,, _. ,_ ARECASTRUM romanzoffianUE Often SG�� D( * ,,��, sun or heavy shade No special care enerous eeding an,. sold as Cocos plumosa) QUEEN PALM . (kU,tif- "4 watering will speed growth Cut back in winter if too heav} Zones 12,13,15-17,19-24 South America ,:a'sc !rt F' v` . - Short lived in warm-winter areas Will not stand strong winds Exceptionally straight trunk to 50 ft tall, )'N, "1 } A elegans.CALICO FLOWER Outdoors in Zones 23-24 hous arching, bright green glossy feather-type I� ` or greenhouse plant elsewhere Twining evergreen vine to 6 f leaves 10-15 ft long are subject to break- �j or more Wiry, slender stems, heart shaped leaves 3 in lone age in high wind Fast grower, responding Whitish buds shaped like little pelicans open to 3-in-wide hear quickly to water and fertilizer Very subject 1 shaped flowers of deep purple veined creamy white Needs ricr A to mites, wash frequently Damaged at soil, moisture partial shade i 25°F, but has recovered from 16°F freeze --.1 Amok -st ,w .m.J `` ne■_st,, Arecastrum ARMERIA THRIFT, SEA PINK Hardy ever- ft SANDWORT Perennial group romanzollianu green perennials All Zones Narrow stiff covers Zones 2-9 14-24 Low evergreen leaves grow in compact tufts or basal ., plants carpet ground with dense mats of rosettes, small white pink, rose or red -.,x,, mosslike foliage, have small white flowers flowers in dense globular heads from early tF' 'v ,, in late spring and summer They are often 1 spring to late fall Sturdy, dependable used as lawn substitutes between stepping plants for edging walks or borders and for 1 \ ,if stones,or for velvety green patches in rock tidy mounds in rock gardens raised beds 't gardens Can be invasive,hard to eradicate L `',t,-, Attractive in containers Need full sun, not �•+r. 1+,� '�,%i in well-watered gardens C-C/,lj _ * fussy about water if drainage is excellent 4 Ni t• A baleanca CORSICAN SANDWORT Shear flowers after Forms dense mat to 3 in high Leaves oval Arenaria montana thick, glossy to ';a in long Grows best in year with slow-acting fertilizer Propagate Armeria maritima bloom Feed once a shade with lots of water Adapted to planting in small areas such by divisions from seeds in spring orfall A.(uniperifolia(A caesprtosa) Native to mountains of Spair as carpet at base of container-grown tree Stiff,needle shaped leaves'/2 in long in low extremely compac A montana It grows 2-4 in high with weak stems up to 1 ft rosettes Flowers rose pink or white in dense round clusters a- long usually covered with soft hairs Leaves grayish '/2-3 in 2-in stems This little mountain native is very touchy aboL long White flowers, 1 in across.profuse in June Good plant to drainage, apply mulch of fine gravel around plants to prever let trail over sunny rock or tumble over low wall Moderate water basal stem rot especially in summer requirements A maritima (Statice armeria Armeria vulgans) COMMO A verna(A caespitosa) See Saguia subulata THRIFT Tufted mounds spreading to 1 ft with 6-in-long stif — — grasslike leaves Small white to rose pink flowers in tight rouni ARGEMONE PRICKLY POPPY Annuals or clusters at top of 6-10-in stalks Blooms almost all year aloni biennials All Zones Prickly leafed and coast, flowers profusely in spring in other areas prickly stemmed plants with large showy poppy flowers Native to desert or dry areas Wyoming to Mexico and west to California K �� ARONIA arbutifolia. RED CHOKEBERRY De- ciduous shrub Zones 1-7 Native to east- .. Grow easily from seed sown where plants � >< , i j••I, = are to bloom or from seed sown in pots for y '''' ern United States Hardy to -10-F ,� .) gentle transplanting Need sun and goodn,� Noteworthy for long season of bright red drainage Bloom mostly in summer To 3 ft foliage and fruit in autumn Large, openly a,'`''i� branched, upright to 6-10 ft or more • Extremely drought toleranti` A intermedia See A polyanthemos Argemone mexicana Leaves, narrow ovals generally about 3 in , ' '-- ,, ,,..., A mexicana Annual Yellow to orange long and half as wide are dark green flowers above gray and feltlike beneath Small A platyceras Annual White flowers Commonest kind 1-in flowers white or pink tinged in 2 in A. polyanthemos (A intermedia) Annual or biennial White clusters April or May, followed by clusters Aroma arbutitolra flowers of brilliant red '/4 in berrylike fruit These ripen to blend with red foliage in September and hang on afte leaves have fallen, attract birds Variety Brilliantissima has ex ARISTOLOCHIA. Deciduous or evergreen ceptionally good berry color vines Curiously shaped flowers in rather Any soil Full sun Tolerates heavy clay Grows in swamps sober colors resemble curved pipes with native area Use in shrubbery border at edge of woodland bu flared bowls keep in mind that it spreads and shoots up suckers freely A californica CALIFORNIA DUTCHMAN S PIPE Deciduous Zones 7-9, 14-24 Native / to coast ranges and Sierra Nevada foothills N, I ARROWHEAD See Sagittaria of northern California Will cover 8 by 12 ft - screen with some training or climb by long ARTEMISIA Evergreen or deciduous thin shoots 10-16 ft into nearby tree , t/ shrubs or woody perennials All Zones to f Flower display before leaves late January Several species are valuable for interesting to April Pendulous 1 in long flowers are Aristoiochra leaf patterns and silvery gray or white cream colored with red purple veins at elegans aromatic foliage. others are aromatic maturity Bright green heart shaped leaves herbs Plant in full sun Drought resistant to 5 in long Grows from seed or from rooted shoots around Keep on dry side Divide in spring and fall +� base of vine Interesting and useful where many less hardy vines Most kinds excellent for use in mixed bor- would freeze Accepts any soil but needs partial shade and der where white or silvery leaves soften \\\In !/ , ample moisture harsh reds or oranges. and blend beauti- /J, / A durior DUTCHMAN S PIPE Deciduous All Zones Native to fully with blues lavenders and pinks �' \�,'r� eastern United States Will cover 15 by 20 ft in one season A.abrotanum SOUTHERNWOOD OLD MAN r. • Easily grown from seed Large 6-14 in long, kidney shaped, Deciduous shrub To 3-5 ft Beautiful \ deep green glossy leaves are carried in shinglelike pattern to lemon scented green feathery foliage.yel form dense cover on trellis Flowers with yellowish green 3 in lowish white flower heads Use for pleas curved tube flare into 3 brownish purple lobes about 1 in wide antly scented foliage in shrub border Hang Arremisia I Bloom in June and July almost hidden by leaves Thrives in full sprigs in closet to discourage moths Burn dracuncuius � PQ p,CHF ✓G O 4YYir``�, �T�$tt Y i 3 '-•,:.-.*iF . 'IRIZONP cDity on. iliache OC2unctwon September 11 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER Yv SUBJECT: PRIVATE ACCESS ROADS In response to the ongoing problems and questions regarding private access roads, Mr. Joe Morvak has suggested a possible solution -- that the location of such private easements be designated, in advance, by adoption of regulations governing all properties. I would like to obtain direction from the council as to whether or not you would like this suggestion pursued. Mr. Morvak will be present at the September 15th work session to explain his suggestion further. kmc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 i›* G2 %g,t4 0 �R�ZoNP it Jt o J �7iacIie unction NOTICE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 38-431 .02, notice is hereby given that the Apache Junction City Council will hold an executive Session on Monday, September 15, 1986 , at 6:00 P.M. , at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex, 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, to consider the following: 1 . Discussion or consideration of employment, assignment, appointment, pro- motion, demotion, dismissal , salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee or employee of any public body, except that, with the exception of salary discussions,an officer, appointee or employee may demand that such discussion or consideration occur at a public meeting. The public body shall provide the officer, appointee or employee with such notice of the executive session as is appropriate, but not less that 24 hours for the officer, appointee or employee to determine whether such discussion or consideration shall occur at a public meeting. 2. Discussion or consideration of records exempt by law from public inspection. 3. Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the city attorney. (Legal advice on use of polygraph for citizen complaints) 4. Discussion or consultation with the city attorneys in order to consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the city's position in pending or contemplated litigation. 4111.16, 5. Discussions or consultations with designated representatives of the city in order to consider its position and instruct its representatives regarding negotiations with employee organizations regarding the salaries, salary schedules or compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits of employees. 6. Discussion, consultation or consideration for the purpose of international or interstate negotiations . 7. Discussion or consultation with designated representatives of the city in order to consider its position and instruct its representatives regarding negotiations for the purchase or lease of real property. Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the City Clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, AZ, Monday through Friday, 8.00 A.M. to 5.00 P.M. , excluding holidays . Dated this 11th day of September, 1986. �Z-ILC•fie-r-i.� ���:x G�� Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk "- 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION A9.IZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 eCFfkAGi O h n U � ii Z • '1Ri ' N C ill/ o r' tpache fc_- n G2072 Z(J P NOTICE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION AGENDA Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 38-431 .02, notice is hereby given that the Apache Junction City Council will hold an executive Session on Tuesday, September 16, 1986 , at 6:00 P.M. , at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex, 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, to consider the following: 1 . Discussion or consideration of employment, assignment, appointment, pro- motion, demotion, dismissal , salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee or employee of any public body, except that, with the exception of salary discussions, an officer, appointee or employee may demand that such discussion or consideration occur at a public meeting. The public body shall provide the officer, appointee or employee with such notice of the executive session as is appropriate, but not less that 24 hours for the officer, appointee or employee to determine whether such discussion or consideration shall occur at a public meeting. 2. Discussion or consideration of records exempt by law from public inspection. 3. Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the city attorney. (Legal advice on use of polygraph for citizen complaints) 4. Discussion or consultation with the city attorneys in order to consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the city's position in pending or contemplated litigation. p 5. Discussions or consultations with designated representatives of the city in order to consider its position and instruct its representatives regarding negotiations with employee organizations regarding the salaries, salary schedules or compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits of employees. 6. Discussion, consultation or consideration for the purpose of international or interstate negotiations . 7. Discussion or consultation with designated representatives of the city in order to consider its position and instruct its representatives regarding negotiations for the purchase or lease of real property. Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the City Clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, AZ, Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 5.00 P.M. , excluding holidays. Dated this 11th da of September, 1986. g (1-7/1Ze-ic. _,i_z gi Kathleen Connelly, City Clh"k 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 PQACH\Gy '' �PLEASE FILL OUT F ;EQUEST TO SPEAK" IF O YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AT CALL .N, TO THE PUBLIC OR ON ANY NON-PUBLIC `' -" O HEARING ITEM. Ei .gR/ZONp. Zt O� ��1(�% Facile � ZLy1Ct207? APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL .•. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA (All items marked with an asterisk (*) will be considered by the City Council as a group and will be adopted with one motion. No separate discussion will be held on any of these items unless a Councilmember wishes to do so. In this case, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ) *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of July 7, 1986 *3. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of September 2, 1986 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED VISITORS AND GUESTS AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, l CACTUS CLUB LOUNGE 5. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 527, PZ-28-86, Application by Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, as a trustee of the Marie Arnold Trust, represented by Ruth Armsby, to rezone a 1.25 acre parcel , located between East 17th Avenue and East 18th Avenue on Wickiup Road, from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 534, PZ-34-86, Application by Keith Stachar, Kathryn Stachar, R.E. Christensen, Lillian Christensen, to rezone a .73 acre parcel , located on the northwest corner of the intersection of West Superstition Boulevard and North Ironwood Drive, from CB-1 Local Business Zone to C-2 Local Commercial District. 7. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 539 AND RESOLUTION NO. 86-37, Declaring a public record and adopting policies for the use of the library program room. 8. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 540, Amending Chapter 8 Business of the City Code, pertaining to yard sales. (With the Emergency Clause) (Councilman Eidson) OLD BUSINESS 9. RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 529, PZ-31-86, WILSON (Councilwoman Gardner) 10. REQUEST FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-17-83, SUNRISE R.V. RESORT (Postponed Item) 11. APPOINTMENTS TO PERSONNEL REVIEW BOARD (Postponed Item) NEW BUSINESS 12. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-36, To consider and if deemed appropriate, to authorize participation in the Arizona Municipal Financing Program. 13. AWARD OF BIDS FOR STREET STRIPING, FUEL, CRACK SEALANT, PAVING MATERIALS, SAND AND AGGREGATES, BRUSH CHIPPER, POWER SWEEPER AND CHIP SEAL. 14. REQUEST TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION EQUESTRIAN PARK ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS. 15. APPOINTMENTS TO YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD 16. ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM AND APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 17. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 18. PROPOSED PALM SPRINGS UNIT 6 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 19. RELOCATION OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY 20. ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATIONS FROM AND APPOINTMENT TO ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM 21. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 6, 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, OCTOBER 7, 1986 22. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL 23. ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS. " CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING JULY 7, 1986 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on July 7, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hill called the meeting to order at 6 33 p m ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Jimenez, Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilwoman Taylor, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Councilman Absent Councilman Baljo Staff Present' City Clerk Kathleen Connelly City Attorney David Alexander EXECUTIVE SESSION, JULY 7, 1986 ) Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THERE BE AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6 34 P.M., ON JULY 7, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM IL Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. The City Council recessed the special meeting into an Executive Session Mayor Hill reconvened the meeting at 6 53 p.m. TERMINATION OF CITY MANAGER'S CONTRACT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 8, 1986 Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ITEM NO. 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, AS THE MOTIONS PROPOSED FOR THIS SPECIAL MEETING, BE APPROVED ITEM NO. 4 THAT MICHAEL J. MCNULTY'S CONTRACT AS CITY MANAGER FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, BE TERMINATED AS OF AUGUST 8, 1986, AND THAT MICHAEL J. MCNULTY BE REMOVED FROM HIS POSITION AS CITY MANAGER AS OF THAT DATE. ITEM NO 5 I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RATIFY ITS ACTION OF JULY 1, 1986, WHEREIN THE COUNCIL EXPRESSED ITS INTENT TO NOTIFY THE CITY MANAGER OF ITS INTENT TO TERMINATE HIS CONTRACT ITEM NO. 6 I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RATIFY THE ACTION OF THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, WHEREBY HE SIGNED AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY MANAGER A LETTER DATED JULY 3, 1986, NOTIFYING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE COUNCIL'S INTENT TO TERMINATE THE CITY MANAGER'S CONTRACT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 8, 1986, AND TO REMOVE THE CITY MANAGER FROM HIS OFFICE AS OF THAT DATE i► s ITEM NO 7 I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CITY CLERK BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO CONTACT RALPH ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES REQUESTING THAT A REPRESENTATIVE BE PRESENT FOR THE JULY 14, 1986 COUNCIL WORK SESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSULTING AND ADVERTISING FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF A NEW CITY MANAGER. ITEM NO 8 1"104. I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CITY CLERK BE APPOINTED AS ACTING CITY MANAGER AS OF AUGUST 8, 1986, UNTIL FURTHER ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion. Councilwoman Taylor asked why the previous actions needed to be ratified. City Attorney David Alexander explained that the City Code does not provide for whom is to deliver the letter to the City Manager, and as the Mayor did deliver the letter, the ratification is to show that it was the wish of a majority of the Council. Councilmembers discussed requesting Ralph & Associates to be consultants for the employment of a new City Manager. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated that this firm is highly recommended, and that the City is not required to solicit bids for professional services. VOTE In Favor Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Jimenez, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill, Councilwoman Taylor (Items 7 & 8 only) Opposed Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Taylor (Items 4, 5, & 6 only) ILThe motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 7 15 P M Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion ^k VOTE Unanimous The motion carried ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 1986 PAGE TWO OF TWO Auk CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on September 2, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. /► CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hill called the meeting to order at 7 08 p m INVOCATION Councilman Eidson gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Mayor Bakkedahl led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Jimenez, Councilman Baljo, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Councilman Absent: Councilwoman Taylor Staff Present: Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark City Attorney David Alexander Representing Director of Public Safety, Lieutenant Dan Scott Controller Keith Lewis Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer Director of Public Work OM\ Rich Broman Lieutenant Reed Cox Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Director of Community Services Jeff Bell Associate Planner Julie Reid Deputy Director/Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa Others Present Ms Maxine Schoenhoft 11450 E. Crescent Avenue Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Joe Morvak 5090 E. Roosevelt Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Earl Laabs 1322 N Goldfield Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Keith Stachar 6301 E. Roundup Apache Junction, AZ Mr Dan Rafferty 10638 E. Boulder Dr. Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Arlie Myers 855 E. Desert Apache Junction, AZ Mr Mike Mecsey 1835 E. 6th St. Tempe, AZ Mr. James Payton 2109 S. Cactus Apache Junction, AZ Mr. Harold Englin 1155 W. Whitely St Apache Junction, AZ Ms Midge Conway 902 S. Ocotillo Apache Junction, AZ ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous (Mayor Hill abstained on Item No 2, as was not present.) The motion carried. Introduction of Distinguished Visitors and Guests Mayor Hill thanked everyone present for attending the meeting. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS None CALL TO THE PUBLIC Ms Maxine Schoenhoft, 11450 E Crescent Avenue, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in regards to business licenses for Reflexology, requesting that the City Code be changed to lower the fee from $1200 00 Mr. Joe Morvak, 5090 E. Roosevelt, Apache Junction, addressed the issue with Grand Center sign, commented that most Board and Commission members have little knowledge of the subject of the Board or Commission, and suggested educating these members Mr. Earl Laabs, 1322 N Goldfield, Apache Junction, representing the Apache Junction Contractor's Association, spoke in opposition to Ordinance No 503. Mr. Keith Stachar, 6301 E. Roundup, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in opposition to Ordinance No. 503. Mr. Dan Rafferty, 10638 E. Boulder Drive, Apache Junction, spoke on Item No. 8, PZ-30-86, requesting approval. Mr Arlie Myers, 855 E. Desert, Apache Junction, Concrete Contractor, spoke in opposition to Ordinance No. 503, requesting that it be repealed. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Acting City Manager Kathleen Connelly reported that the city was notified that a grant has been awarded in the amount of $6,000 from the Governor's Office. Associate Planner Julie Reid stated that this Community Development Block Grant was in the amount of $6,000 which was 20% of the funding for the entire State. Director of Public Works Rich Broman gave an update on the progress of street improvements. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 520, PZ-26-86 RIENDL ) Associate Planner Julie Reid briefed the Council on the application for rezoning of two combined parcel of 10 acres, located on the southwest corner of West Lost Dutchman Boulevard and North Warner Road, from General Rural to Multiple Family Residence by Planned Development, submitted by Joe and Natalie Riendl, and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application. Mr Mike Mecsey, 1835 E. 6th St., Tempe, representing the applicants, requested approval of the rezoning. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 520, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 520, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-26-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 520, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl expressed concern with the sewage system being partially in Pinal County Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer stated that the developer would have to obtain a franchise in order to extend lines into the City. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 521, PZ-27-86, OSBORN ) Mr. Newcomer stated that this is an application for rezoning of a three acre parcel, located on East 20th Avenue, ,. east of South Tomahawk Road, from General Rural to CR-3(MH) Single Family Residence Zone, submitted by William and Betty Osborn represented by John Gargrave, and further stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning, with the stipulation that the request be changed from CR-3 to CR-2(MH) Mr. John Gargrave, 403 S. Cardinal, Apache Junction, explained that the applicants propose to sell a portion of the property and reside on a portion, and stated that CR-2 is sufficient. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 521, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows: ORDINANCE NO 521, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-27-85 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-3(MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. .^ Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 521, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT THAT CR-3(MH) BE CHANGED TO CR-2(MH) Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. Councilwoman Gardner asked if legally there may only be the three proposed splits City Attorney David Alexander stated that legally one individual can only split it into three parcels in either CR-2 or CR-3. VOTE. In Favor Councilman Eidson, Councilman Jimenez, Councilman Baljo Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed Councilwoman Gardner The motion carried. w PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 525, PZ-24-86, CASAllA ) Associate Planner Julie Reid briefed the council on the request for rezoning of a 5 acre parcel, located on the southeast corner of North Meridian Drive and West Lost Dutchman Boulevard, from General Rural to C-2 Local Commercial District, and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the application, and that the requirement for a site plan is not included in the proposed ordinance "link Ms Ione Chovanec, 1980 W. Canyon, Apache Junction, requested approval of the application. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. Mr. Joe Morvak, 59 E. Roosevelt, Apache Junction, addressed the Council in favor of the request for rezoning. There being no one else wishing to addressed the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 525, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows [ ORDINANCE NO. 525, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-24-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 525, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE t► FOLLOWING AMENDMENT: THAT A SITE PLAN BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TO BE REVIEWED BY THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 526, PZ-25-86, PAYTON ) Assistant Jim Nakagawa briefed the Council on the application for rezoning of a 2.08 acre parcel, located on the west side of Cactus Road, 200 feet north of 4th Avenue, from General Rural to Single Family Residence CR-2 (MH), and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the request. Mr. James Payton, 210 S. Cactus Road, Apache Junction, requested approval of the application. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 526, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the ,d.\ motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 526, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 526, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Eidson seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 527, PZ-28-86, CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF CHICAGO (Trustee) Mr. Newcomer explained that the applicants have not been able to submit the required quit-claim deeds for roadway dedication, and after further study by staff, recommended that this application for rezoning be returned to the Planning and Zoning Commission Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 527, BE RETURNED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR A HEARING AND BROUGHT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 7, 1986 Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 528, PZ-30-86, FOLSOM AND RAFFERTY Ms Reid stated that this is an application for rezoning of two combined parcels of 24 acres, located on South Royal Palm approximately 330 feet south of Southern Avenue, from General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence, and further stated that both the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff recommend denial of the application. Mr. Newcomer commented that a meeting was held with the adjoining property owners regarding basic zoning issues, and it was concluded that this particular neighborhood does desire a o► ^ 4IPP"''S higher density with major changes to the transportation system, which would require easement dedications by the property owners. Councilman Eidson asked for an explanation of "spot zoning" Mr. Newcomer explained that this is basically zoning not in accord with the other zoning in the neighborhood, and in this case, with the current street layout, it cannot be accomodated. Alm\ Mr. Dan Rafferty, 10638 E Boulder Drive, Apache Junction, representing the applicants, stated that this neighborhood should not have been annexed originally as the property owners were not in favor of that. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 528, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO 528, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-30-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 528, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion Councilman Baljo stated that this request does not violate the General Plan, so should be allowed. Councilman Jimenez commented that compatibility with the surrounding area should be a major consideration in the rezoning, and possibly the applicant would wait for the rezoning until it is decided whether the density in the neighborhood will be changed. Ms Reid explained that a major concern is the pedestrian traffic on Southern Avenue, and to set a zoning precedent in a neighborhood such as this would proliferate and cause a problem of private drives accessing onto Southern Avenue, over which the City has no control. Councilman Eidson withdrew the motion. Councilman Baljo withdrew the second to the motion Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE HEARING BE REOPENED TO THE PUBLIC ar=i,�sA Awn. oak IP"-Mr Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried Mr. Rafferty stated that Southern Avenue is a main arterial street, and additional traffic should not be a consideration. Councilman Jimenez asked Mr Rafferty if he would consider postponing this application, and working with staff to determine how the area should continue to develop. Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 528, BE POSTPONED FOR 90 DAYS UNTIL THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 2, 1986. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 529, PZ-31-86, WILSON Ms Reid briefed the Council on the request for rezoning of a 1.36 acre parcel, located on the south side of West Shiprock midway between North Main Drive and North Ironwood Drive, from General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone, and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of the rezoning Mr. Harold Englin, 1155 W Whitely Street, Apache Junction, addressed the Council stating that he wished to purchase the property, but it is useless as presently zoned. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. Ms Midge Conway, 902 S Ocotillo Dr , Apache Junction, stated that an adjacent property owner, being out of town, was not aware that he must protest on a Planning Department form but would like to object to this application There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 529 BE POSTPONED UNTIL OCTOBER 7, 1986, TO ALLOW THE THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER TO FILE A FORM OF PROTEST. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. Councilman Baljo spoke in favor of the rezoning, stating that it is in compliance with the General Plan Councilman Jimenez stated that the adjacent property owner should have the opportunity to formally protest. Ms Reid explained that due to this person being on vacation, there was not sufficient time to submit a protest. Councilman Eidson spoke against postponing, feeling that a decision should be made at this time Amok Aft, VOTE. In Favor Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl Opposed Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Mayor Hill The motion failed. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 529, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Amok Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 529, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-31-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 529, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion VOTE: In Favor: Councilman Eidson, Councilman Baljo, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, ( Mayor Hill Opposed: Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 531, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (With Emergency Clause) ) Amik ) Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that this ordinance is to repeal stop signs at three-way intersections determined to be unnecessary. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the ordinance. There being on one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 531, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 531, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REPEALING oft, ir.nr THE DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN LOCATIONS FOR STOP SIGNS INSTALLATIONS, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 531, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 532, PZ-29-86, IMPERIAL Ms Reid briefed the Council on the application for rezoning of a 4 7 acre parcel, located between South Stagecoach and South Acacia Road from Highway 60 North to East 18th Avenue, from General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District, and stated that staff and Planning and Zoning Commission both recommend approval of the application with stipulations for dedications. Mr. Dan Rafferty, representing the applicants, stated that there are no immediate plans for this property and requested approval of the application. Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the rezoning. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 532, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 532, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-29-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 532, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Hill recessed the meeting at 9:55 p.m. Mayor Hill reconvened the meeting at 10.06 p.m. Adak "Ink OLD BUSINESS RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 503, ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW, PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS Councilman Eidson stated that due to lack of time to review this ordinance prior to it's adoption, it should be reconsidered as it could cause hardships for small businesses. Amok Mayor Hill suggested postponing the reconsideration to allow sufficient time to study the ordinance. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 503, BE RECONSIDERED Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 503 BE CONTINUED AND AMENDED TO BECOME EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 5, 1986 Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. Councilman Eidson requested that this ordinance be discussed at the next two or three Work Sessions. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried NEW BUSINESS MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-51-83, WINDSONG MOBILE HOME PARK Associate Planner Jim Nakagawa iimmk explained that the applicant, Ms Joni Hegel of Sierra National Corporation, is requesting a major amendment to the planned development for a 136 space rental mobile home park, which meets open space requirements, and further stated that staff recommends approval of this request, with the five stipulations Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR WINDSONG MOBILE HOME PARK BY SIERRA NATIONAL CORPORATION BE APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS ONE THROUGH FIVE Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried EXPIRATION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PZ-26-81, ORDINANCE NO. 130 Ms Reid stated that this was a planned development proposal for a mini-storage, RV storage and retail store complex to be located at the intersection of North Apache Trail, North Winchester Road and East Superstition Blvd., which expired on December 18, 1985, and that the developer has indicated that the present zoning is not appropriate, requesting a change to be determined by the City Council Ms Reid further stated that staff recommends the zoning revert to C-3 General Commercial District for the North 200 feet and C-2 Local Commercial District for the South 410 feet. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE APPROVED EXTENSION OF ONE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 18, 1985, FOR REZONING CASE PZ-26-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 130) HAS EXPIRED AND THEREFORE SHALL BE REVERTED TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FOR THE NORTH 200 FEET AND C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FOR THE SOUTH 410 FEET, THIS CLASSIFICATION BEING DEEMED AN APPROPRIATE DESIGNATION FOR THE SUBJECT SITE, STIPULATING THAT SITE PLAN APPROVAL OCCUR PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. KENDLEWOOD MANUFACTURING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REVOLVING LOAN ASSISTANCE Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph explained that Kendlewood Manufacturing has acqiured a five acre site for the production of custom-made, modular commercial and office units, and would employ 15-20 persons, with a potential of 80-100 persons within 15 months, and requested Council support for the pre-application process to the Arizona Department of Commerce for loan assistance Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE MAYOR BE AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE KENDLEWOOD MANUFACTURING PROJECT TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. APPOINTMENT TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD ) Director of Community Services Jeff Bell stated that a Talent Bank application has been submitted by B.J. Sutherland to fill the vacancy on the Youth Advisory Board. Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT B.J. SUTHERLAND BE APPOINTED TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. APPOINTMENT TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Mr. Bell stated that there are currently two vacancies on the Parks and Recreation Commission, and that an application has been submitted by Mr. Nicholas McVicker Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT NICHOLAS MCVICKER BE APPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. ' 1111111111. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried LEASE FOR PROSPECTOR PARK CONCESSION rk ) Mr. Bell explained that one option for the operation of the concession building at Prospector Park is to solicit bids from vendors, based on a percentage of gross sales to be paid to the City. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES, THROUGH THE ACTING CITY MANAGER, TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CONCESSION BUILDING AT PROSPECTOR PARK. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. FIVE-YEAR PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN Mr Bell recommended approval of the Five-Year Parks and Open Space Plan as reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THE FIVE YEAR PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. FACILITY USE MANUAL AMENDMENT FOR SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER imrk ) Mr Bell explained that since there is not a policy established for the use of the new Senior/Community Center, and requested that the Council amend the Community Service Department's Facility Use Manual as per the submitted recommendations, adding that there is million dollar liability insurance requirement for groups wishing to use the facility. Councilmembers expressed concern with the insurance requirement, and suggested checking into other possibilities. City Attorney David Alexander stated that the City should have this requirement. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT THE POLICY AND FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE USE OF THE SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER BE POSTPONED FOR 30 DAYS UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 7, 1986, UNTIL THIS MAY BE DISCUSSED IN WORK SESSION AND WITH THE CITY'S INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER. Councilman Bali() seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. """ AWARD OF BID FOR TWO POLICE SPECIAL CARS ) Lieutenant Reed Cox informed the Council that four bids were submitted for two police special cars, and recommended that the bid be awarded to Arnold's Auto Center, which was not the lowest but more closely met the specifications. Lieutenant Cox explained that one of these cars is for the Police Department and one for the City Manager. Councilman Eidson stated that the bid should be awarded to Arnold's Auto Center, as the local bidder. Councilman Jimenez expressed his opinion that the lower bids sufficiently met the specifications, and should be awarded the bid whether located in Apache Junction or not. Councilman Baljo also felt that the bid should be awarded to the local bidder. Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT THE BID FOR TWO POLICE SPECIAL CARS BE AWARDED TO CHAPMAN CHEVROLET, IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,856.76 EACH. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor: Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Opposed. Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Mayor Hill The motion failed. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE BID FOR TWO POLICE SPECIAL CARS BE AWARDED TO ARNOLD'S AUTO CENTER, IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,235 PLUS TAX EACH. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion VOTE: In Favor: Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Mayor Hill Opposed Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl The motion failed. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT THE TWO POLICE SPECIAL CARS BE ADVERTISED FOR REBID. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor Councilman Jimenez, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Gardner, Mayor Hill Opposed Vice Mayor Bakkedahl The motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR POLICE MOTORCYCLES Lieutenant Reed Cox stated that two bids were received for two police motorcycles, and recommended awarding the bid to Kawasaki in the amount of $8044.48 each Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT THE BID FOR POLICE MOTORCYCLES BE AWARDED TO KAWASAKI, IN THE AMOUNT OF $8044.48. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. 3 VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. SELECTION OF DATE FOR SPECIAL WORK SESSION) Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT A SPECIAL WORK SESSION BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1986, AT 6 00 P M , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Amok Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6 00 P M , AND A WORK SESSION AT 7 00 P M., ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6 00 P M , ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) None. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Amok Councilman Jimenez suggested inviting Arizona Department of Transportation for a public information meeting in Apache Junction. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 11 33 P.M. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried *Consent Agenda Items are as follows *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2 Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of August 5, 1986 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES I 7 _ j,L )ii(\ / )05/ I)) 11/1CP ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: ( La"U SECONDED BY: 1.)r) I /5 ____ YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ,,..., COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR V 46 COUNCILMAN BALJO i MAYOR HILL d r UNANI""OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ' r ITEM NOS. 1-3 I MOVE THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1-3, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. PUBLIC HEARING - L THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE THE APPLICANT IS MACKAY HAWLEY 2. IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME. 3. ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4. IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. rPQACHF k G A } 3 , 1 yiy � ;. qRl ZO NP Kity o packe �unct2on September 10, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY CITY COUNCIL FROM• ACTING CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, CACTUS CLUB LOUNGE In accordance with procedures for processing applications for liquor licenses, notice was posted on the premises at 650 W. Apache Trail , Apache Junction, Arizona, on the 20th day of August, 1986, by the Deputy City Clerk. The notice remained posted for twenty (20) days, during which time written arguments in favor of or in opposition to the proposed person transfer were to be filed with the City Clerk. As of this date, there have been no objections addressed to the City on this matter. Upon inspectioningthepremises, the Department of Public Safety find the esta- blishment to have two unblocked exits a=rrdadequate parking. Attached is a recommendation from the Apache Junction Fire Department. )-r.` -,, Agenda Approved by �.� '` * --- Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing /4! 4 Old Business ------- New Business . - Postponed Item ammo sm.... 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 Apache Junction Fire District P 0 BOX 829 150 N OCOTILLO APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 Emergency - 982-2551 Business - 982-3221 September 9, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: APACHE JUNCTION CITY CLERK FROM: FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU APACHE JUNCTION FIRE DISTRICT SUBJECT: INSPECTION ON APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANS- FER OF A SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, CACTUS CLUB Pursuant to the request from the City Clerk's Office, Cactus Club, located at 650 W. Apache Trail, Apache Junction, was inspected. The owner of said establishment, Mr. Mackay Hawley Ashley, has agreed to comply with all requirements of the 1982 Uniform Fire Code, which is enforced by this office. Due to this agreement of compliance, the Apache Junction Fire District recommends approval of the liquor license transfer. John Flynn Fire Prevention Inspector JAF:pz - LEARN NOT TO BURN - IAN STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Date of Posting: August 20, 1986 Applicant: Mr. Mackay Hawley Ashley agent for Cactus Club Lounge Address of Premises: 650 W. Apache Trail Apache Junction, AZ 85220 License(s) Applied for: Person Transfer of Series 6 Liquor License I hereby certify that pursuant to Section 4-201, A.R.S., I did post notice in a conspicuous place on the premises concerning the above liquor license(s) and said notice shall remain posted for a period of at least 20 consecutive days. Signatu , of City/County Clerk or Representative: G , ply noputy City Clork Dated: August 20, 1986 Return this affidavit with your recommendation and any related petitions to: Department of Liquor Licenses and Control 1645 West Jefferson, Suite 227 Phoenix, AZ 85007 *For text of Section 4-201, A.R.S., please see reverse. REV 8/81 P 1RM 1 7R , /0 \r„.. ....) FORM 120 ` - U L L.C. USE ONLY - ' REV, 10/84 i �" / - ( /l 7 STATE OF ARIZONA DFPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WFST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 100 NORTH STONE AVENUE,SUITE 904 PHOENIX,AZ 85007 TUCSON,AZ 85701 602/255.5141 602/628 5831 APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE Type or print with black ink. NOTE. PROCEigiG OF MOST APPLICATIONS TAKES 90 DAYS,AND CIRCUMSTANCES rOFTEN"'RESULT IN A LONGER WAITING PERIOD THEREFORE, YOU ARE f.CAUTIc1*CD REGARDING EXTENSIVE FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS PLANS FOR • WA GRA6 T'OPENING, ETC., BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF THE =LICENS v SECTIai 1. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A: - -- -' . . 0 IT kW LICILSISE,Complete Sections 2,3,4,6, 14, 15 Reviewed by• Accepted by. DXPP'�y'�RSON TRANSFER SERIES 8&9s ONLY,Complete Sections 2,3,4,5 9, 14 15 Current file flagged by ❑ LOCATIOP RANSFER 8&9s ONLY,Complete Sections 2,3,4,5, 10, 14, 15 Copies made for posting by ❑ NEW AGEITFOR CORP OR CLUB,Complete Sections 2,3,4,5, 11, 14, 15 Copies mailed for posting by Data ❑ PROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT,Complete Sections 2 3 4, 5, 12 14, 15(fee not required) Copies for background by Date ❑ GOVERNMENT LICENSE,Complete Sections 2,3,4,5, 13, 14, 16 Comments. l '�L SECTION T. TYPE OF OWNERSHIP: 6 // C) C) / REF.DATA ❑ INDIVIDUAL,Complete Section 7 0 CLUB,Complete Section 8 CLAIM# T.R. # T R DATE CODE AMT ❑ PARTNERSHIP,Complete Section 7 0 GOVERNMENT / EXCORPORATION,Complete Section 8 0 OTHER,explain• II r 0 SECTION 3. APPLICANT. IAII applicants must complete this Section/ 1 APPLICANT'S OR AGENT S NAME• ASHLEY MACKAY HAPILEY (Insert one name only-to appear on License) Last Name First Name Middle „esee` 2. CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP NAME• PEMBINA ASSOCIATES, INC. (AN ARIZONA CORPORATION) - Enter exact name as it appears on Articles of Inc or Partnership Agreement 3 BUSINESS NAME. CACTUS CLUB LOUNGE Enter exact name as it appears on the exterior of premises 4. BUSINESS ADDRESS• 650 WEST APACHE TRAIL Do not use P.O. Box Number e BUSINESS PHONE NO. 982-1148 RESIDENCE PHONE NO. 832-2752 6. CITY. APACHE JUNCTION COUNTY PINAL ZIP CODE 8 5 7 7 0 7, MAILING ADDRESS SAME CITY STATE ZIP CODE B. IS THE BUSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OF THE ABOVE CITY OR TOWN• i3 YES n NO I •D L.L.C. USE ONLY- PIV# FEES. APP LIC FEE ACT CHG MFG CLUB TOTAL SECTION 41e). INDICATE LICENSE SERIES' Check only one,Use separate form for each license NEW LICENSE FEES Total Due if Filed'Total Due if Filed Person to Person Location SERIES Nov.1-May 15 1 May 16-Oct 31 Transfer Fee Annual Renewal Transfer Fe O 1 DISTILLERS LICENSE (IN STATE) 1 950 00 1,775 00 350 00 O 2 BREWERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1,950 00 I 1,775 00 350 00 O 3 VINTNERS LICENSE(IN STATE) • 1 750.00 I 1,675 00 150 00 O 4 WHOLESALER,ALL LIQUORS 1 050 00 I 1,725 00 250 00 ,/a.► O 6 WHOLESALER,WINE AND BEER 1,700 00 1 1,650 00 100 00 {6 ON SALE RETAILER,ALL LIQUORS 1,75000 1 1,67500 400.00 15000 20000 O 7 ON SALE RETAILER,WINE AND BEER 475 00 I 437.50 75.00 O 8 ON SALE RETAILER,BEER ' 325 00 312 50 25 00 O 9 OFF SALE RETAILER,ALL LIQUORS 1,65000 1 1625.00 40000 5000 20000 O 10 OFF SALE RETAILER,WINE AND BEER 45000 I 425 00 5000 O 11 • OFF.3LE RETAILER,BEER 325 00 i 312 50 25 00 O 12 lF•� RAP��A OAD TRAIN LICENSE 1,82500 1,712 50 225 00 O 13 bur Ail NE LICENSE 1,825 00 ( 1 712 50 22,5 00 0 14 PR1y�TE CLUB LICENSE 1,250 00 I 1 175 00 • 150 00 O 15Q HORL/MOTEL LICENSE,Complete Section 6 2,100 00 l 1,850 00 • 500 00 • O io Rtr3'T'AURANT LICENSE,Complete Section 6 2,100 00 1 1,850 00 • 500 00 • O 2M OO--V�ERNMENT LICENSE 300 00 I 250 00 • 100 00 P� O fhir CRAPORATION AGENT CHANGE —6100 00 I y •NmPermitted I I I SECTION 4(b). BONDING 1, NAME OF BONDING COMPANY 2 EFFECTIVE DATE OF BOND AMOUNT $ SECTION 6. QUESTIONS FOR ALL APPLICANTS: 1. Property Parcel Number* 2 Legal Description of Licensed Property.SEE ATTACHED 3. Distance to the nearest school. 2 MILES Neme/address of school FOUR PEAKS F7.F1'1Fi1TARV SCIIOOL 4 Are you the. DOWNER, XI LESSEE, OSUBLESSEE, OPURCHASER of the premises 5. If the premises is leased,give name end address of lessor. JOHN E. SOUTHARD, 5 8 2 a E. SPEEDWAY , •.. Name ;•rREDDINGTON PLAZA, TUCSON, AZ . 85710 Address City State Zip �t 8 Hes a license,or transfer of license,for the premises represented herein been dented by the State within the pest sixty months OYES fO If yes,attach an explanation. 7, Does any alcoholic beverage manufacturer,wholesaler,or employee thereof,have any interest in your business OYES liNO 8. Is the premises licensed with e license other then the one for which you ere applying OYES 6NO.If so,give license No / / / / / / / Licensee. (exactly as It appears on Licence) Lest Name First Name Middle 9 Whet Is your Arizona State Sales Tax(Privilege) License No 11—016 2 0 7 N 10 Do you understand that a portion of the fees,such as Application Fee(3100 00) and Interim Permit Fee(if applicable) it not refundable Yi'S'ES ONO SECTION 6. FOR SERIES 15 OR 16 APPLICANTS' 1. Is thee I Valid Series 16 or 16 license currently Issued et the proposed locution•OYES ONO If so,enter licensee s name exactly as 1t appears on license License No / / / ! / Ir / Last Name First Nam• Middle NOTE* If the answer to question 1 above Is"yes",you may qualify for on Interim Permit to operate while your application Is pending;consult Section 4 203 01,A R S,complete•Form 176,ettach appropriate fee,attach the current license,and submit with this epplicetion, —2. What percentage of your gross sales re me the purchase of"food"' -% - - 3, Hew much of your floor macs Is dr'--ed for resteur•nt dining(sq ft), , Seetlr•--opacity-for dialog purposes "—_jiwe you eHsrti..� ...... - _ • IOW ' ) ) SECTION 7. INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP OWNERS• 1 Answer the following questions IIf applicants are married,answer each question for both husband and wife) —Percentage Owned General Limited Lest Nome First Name • Middle by each person R°sidence Address City,Stets, Zip u ❑ oakApplicant(enter here and in section 3) ❑ ❑ Partner CI 0 Partner ❑ ❑ Partner Attach additional sheet if necessary r,,t7 EACH PCjSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND AN"APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD. fS 2. Ws each p&ESn listed above a bone fide resident of Arizona• OYES ONO t7 U-1 3 ell any part,other then the above,going to share In the profits/losses of the business OYES ONO r"1 Q -+ u"--) BECTIOO8. CflRPORATION OR CLUB APPLICANTS. EI1 PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND SUBMIT AN"APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, 1. Name of corporation or club. PEMBINA ASSOCIATES, INC. (Enter exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc or Club Charter) 2. '—Dan Incorporated or chartered 1/8 4 State where incorporated. ARI Z ONA 3 Arizona Corporation Commission File No* N h �/7 Date authorized to do business In Arizona / 4 Is corporation or club nonprofit. OYES O. If so,give I R S tax exempt No• 5 If■club,refer to Section 4-101 4,A R S,and enter the subparagraph under which you are applying 6 List officers end directors' Lest Name First Name Middle Title Residence Address City,State, Zip ASHLEY MACKAY HAWLEY PRESIDENT 4742 E. CONTESSAL NESA, AZ. 8520 p Attach additional sheet if necessary 7, List stockholders owning 10%or more• Last Name First Name Middle Percentage Owned Residence Address City,State,Zip Ytf gY N7"/4►-4f ►.sVfY /0 47C 1}r•7 se P ,C•""lrs— -'vf :4 p5 i p 4-- If this corp Is owned by another corp.,attach an ownership,officer/director disclosure for the parent corporation Attach additional sheets as necessary { SECTION 9 PERSON TO PERSON TRANSFER QUESTIONS TO BE COMPLETED BY CURRENT LICENSEE. (Series 6&9 only) 1. Current licensee• KELLER HOWARD D. Entity Exactly as It appears on lic,A Last Name First Name Middle Etal Agt,etc. 11 2 Corporate name / If current license Is In the name of a corporation,enter exactly as it appears on iicbnse 3 Current business name THE CACTUS CLUB LOUNGE Exactly as It appears on license 4. Current business address: 650 WEST APACHE TRAIL County FINAL Exactly as it appears on license City ApA('}'-TE JUNCTION, ARI ZONA ZIP Code. P 52 20 5 License Series. 6 License Number. 0/ 6/L/1 /1 /0 /0 /8 Date of last renewal �^_ Have you complied with the Uniform Commercial Code concerning bulk sale transfers 5//ES ONO If not,attach en explanation 7, Hews all creditors lien holders,int holders,etc been notified of this transfer XI V ES ONO 8 Does the applicant Intend to operate the business while this application Is pending IXYES ONO If so,complete Form 176,attach appropriate fee, attach current license,and submit with this application(for Series 6,9, 15 or 16 only). 9. To be completed by the CURRENT LICENSEE• I HEREBY RELINQUISH MY RIGHTS TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LICENSE TO THE APPLICANT NAMED HEREIN AND HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS SECTION ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE 10. Current mailing address other than business. P .O. BOX 4 50 , TERREBONIZE, OREGODI 9 77 6 0 s'- I ,-7- SZ • Signature of current licensee Date signed STATE OF ic ( ice/" COUNTY OF T)) 1 J ll SUBSCRIBED AN13 OR afore me this / day of , 19 00 1.: Signature Nt �Y PUBLIC W y Comnon expires on MY Commission Expires Mar. 29, L9/O SECTI4 1C. LOCATION TO LOCATION TRANSFER QUESTIONS* (Series 6&9 only) 'PLICANT9 CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT IS FINALLY APPROVED BY THE STATE 1. =syrrent b,pess address' County• FoeExactly as It appears on license CD City. ZIP Code. 2 Current btl�it ass name Exactly as it appears on license 3 New business address• County Also enter In Section 3 Do not use P 0 Box Number City: ZIP Code 4. New business name /s\. Also enter In Section 3 — 6. License Series* License Number / / f / / / / Date of last renewal 6 Whet date do you plan to move Date of planned opening FEE a$100 (Refer to Section 4 209 H,ARS, SECTION 11. APPOINTMENT OF NEW AGENT FOR CORPORATION OR CLUB LICENSE. for multiple agent change fees) 1. Current Agent's name* Exactly as It appears on license Last Name First Name Middle 2. New Agent's name Also enter In Section 3 Last Name First Name Middle 3 License Series License number / / / / / / / Date of lest renewal 4 Does this transaction Involve the sale of any portion of the corporate stock. OYES ONO. If so,Complete Section 8 5. To be completed by a CORPORATE OFFICER. 1, , HEREBY CONSENT TO THE AGENT APPOINTMENT Printed Name of Corporate Officer NAMED HEREIN AND AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY ASSIGN A NEW AGENT IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH, RESIGNATION,OR DISCHARGE OF THIS AGENT I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE BACKGROUND REPORT SHOWS THAT I, THE CORPORATION,OR ANY OFFICER, DIRECTOR OR STOCKHOLDER HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION IN TIIE PAST YEAR, I WILL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER THE LICENSE TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL AND HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO APPEAL SUCH ACTION Signature of corporate/club officer STATE OF COUNTY OF SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of r 19 Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC _ • r SECTION 12. PROBATE OR WILL ASSIGNMENT OF AN EXISTING LICENSE (Doss not apply to corporations): 1. Current licensee s name Exactly as It appears on license Last Name First Name Middle 2. Assignee s name Also enter In Section 3 Lest Name First Name Middle 3 License Series License number I I / / / / / Date of lest renewal 4 Attach a certified copy of the will or probate distribution instrument that specifically distributes the liquor license to the assignee SECTION 13. GOVERNMENT LICENSE (for cities,towns,or counties only). 1 Person to administer this license Also enter In Section 3 Last Name First Name Middle 2. Applicant. . Attach respective governing body's authorization Name of City,Town or County 3 Heve you answered ALL questions in Section 3,Including the location to be licensed OYES ONO 4. Do you understand that you can only serve alcoholic beverages for consumption on the licensed premises OYES ONO 5. WIll a concessionaire be using this license OYES ONO If so,attach the agreement and appropriate authorizations required by Section 4 205 03,A R S 6. Do you understand a separate license must be obtained for each premises from which alcoholic beverages are to be served OYES ONO t,� r_� SECTION 14 DIAGRAM OF PREMISES (Diagram must be on this form,blueprints not accepted). _� I. SH ONLY[uHE AREA TO BE COVERED BY THIS LICENSE, INCLUDE ALL ENTRANCES/EXITS DRIVE IN WINDOWS, SERVICE WINDOWS, LIQUOR STORAGE AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OR SQUARE FOOTAGE FIGURES DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS,LIVING Ot2RTERS, RC SERIES 15 AND SERIES 16 APPLICANTS MUST EXPLICITLY DEPICT KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND DINING FACILITIES ..C3 r..- r.,r �p / /1 N 0t v L. 5 b spo 0 • 00 ' e ,sPi ., ii.'Of Vo>L �eedz ToT�Al • ;oW sQ,F: . r ( 9 ' 2. Do you agree to notify the Department of env changes of boundaries entrences exits,or service windows prior to modification• if ES ONO 3 The above dl,Qrr,ain ijs the I ree where alcoholic beverages are to be sold,served,consumed dispensed,possessed or stored —C-- e 4 _ - ! .// - --- SECTION 15. SIGNATURE BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS. STATE OF ARIZONA ) Is COUNTY OF 4'• "/ZE7 , BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH, Printed Name of Applicant(or Agent If Corp or Club) HEREBY DEPOSE, SWEAR, AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT(I) I AM THE APPLICANT, (OR AGENT IF APPLICANT IS A CORPORATION/CLUB), MAKING THE FOREGOING APPLICATION (2) THAT SAID APPLICATION HAS BEEN READ AND THAT^E CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE. (3) THAT APPLICATION IS NOT BEING MADE TO DEFRAUD OR INJURE ANY CREDITOR TAXING AUTHORITY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, OR TRANSFEROR; (4) THAT NO OTHER PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION, EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREIN HAS AN INTEREST IN THE SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WHICH THESE STATEMENTS ARE MADE (5) AND THAT NONE OF THE OWNERS,PARTNERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, OR STOCKHOLDERS LISTED HEREIN HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION IN THE PAST YEAR. /f /2 f f Signature V / SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN T or this // /J day of (2 -e- ,Cf q�— , 19` 4 L Sims rig of NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires on MY Commission Expires Mar 29, 1990 LO CTa _ 0— W � O cd O d ur) fV ad .w r" SUPPLEMENT FOR QUESTION IN SECTION 5, QUESTION 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE CACTUS CLUB LOUNGE, 650 WEST APACHE TRAIL, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 : "CAFE PARCEL NORTH OF HIGHWAY N.E. BEGINNING 391. 63 ' EAST OF CENTER, 125 ' BY 200 ' SEC - 20 - 1 N, B 0 C 82-03977" 1243 co a tu a_ CC 1.0 o ' ii FORM t2OA — D L L C USE ONLY — Rev. 10/84 ' STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 PHOENIX, AZ 85007 602/255 5141 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER, PARTNER, STOCKHOLDER (10 o OR MORE), AND MANAGER ALSO, EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM MLST SUBMIT AN "APPLICANT" TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, WHICH MAY BE Am.. OBT-\!NED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY\.- UREAD CAREFULLY, THLS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT. 0,� 1 Name ASHLEY MACKAY HAWLEY Date of birth 0 7/0 9/3 3 Last First Middle Month day year MANIOU, MANITOBA 2 Business Name CACTUS CLUB LOUNGE Place of birth. (CANADA) (As it appears in Section 3 of Form 120) City State 650 WEST APACHE TRAIL, APACHE JUNCTION PINAL 85220 3 Business address cc,(Do not use P O Box number) City County Zip Code CO 4 Drivers ibinse No JI:14 616092 Height 6 ' 2" weight 220 LBS Eye color BLUE Hair color BLOND O State C O ct MOORE 08/27/41 5 Name otouse ---ELAINE IRENE ASHLEY Date of birth First Middle Last Maiden Lis 6 Of whawtate are you a bona fide resident ARIZONA If Arizona date of residency 1983 R 7 Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed or Business (Give Street Address City State,and Zip Code) I A DATES PEMBINA ASSOCIATES, INC . Present Position or business engaged 1/8 4 TO PRESIDENT/ 4742 E. CONTESSA in DATE OWNER OF BAR MESA, AZ. 85205 B DATES PRESIDENT OF A PEMBINA MOTORS, LTD Position immediately d or busiss engaged preced ng above(A) In 1977 TO DEVELOPMENT CO , 11158 LINCOL DR. 1/R4 VANCOUVER,B.0 (CANADA) C DATES Position held or business engaged in immediately preceding above(B) Attach additional sheet if necessary 8 Indicate where you have resided for the last five years FROM TO RESIDENCE. Month Year Month Year Street City State Zip Code _ 7 85_ DATE 4742 E. CONTESSA MESA AZ. 8-52-0-5-- 7 83 7 85 SP. 446 GOLDDUST CIF APACHE JCT_ AZ_ P. 22n 1977 , 1 83 11198 T,TNCOT, DR_ VANCOTIVER R_C'_ Attach additional sheet if necessary __-9,flaw many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto 10-12 HOURS. - p p 982- 1148 832-2752 10 Give Telephone Numbers for Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detained cited arrested indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor violations OYES ENO 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail,been fined imprisoned had sentence suspended,or placed on probation for violation of any law or ordinance OYES k` NO 13 Have you ever had a business,professional,or liquor license rejected,denied,revoked suspended,or fined in this or any other state OYES ENO 14 Have you ever had an application for any business,professional,or liquor license rejected or denied OYES ENO p .5 Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a judgment against you in any civil action, the subject of which involved fraud or misrepresentation of a liquor related matter OYES gNO 16 If any answer to Questions 9 through 15 is YES ,attach a signed statement giving complete details 17. Are you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations* YES ONO 18 Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales(Privilege)Tax Account and your city permit fees(if applicable)current ' YES ONO 19 Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of any proposed change of business name prior to making any such changes RYES ONO C.JM 20 Do yc.gree to post the permit or license,if issued,in a conspicious place on the premises and within view of the general public (YES ONO CL w ifl. 21 Do yc agree to plikhase all liquor,wine and beer supplies only from licensed Arizona wholesalers YES ONO C:0 t7 22 Do ycgagree to keep all records,invoices and other documents relating to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a periorcf two yeaj and to have them easily accessible for examination RYES CND 23 Do yot�consent g the duration of the permit or license, if issued to the entrance inspection,and search by any law enforcement official,without warrant or other process,of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of the State Liquor Laws Regulations,and Board Directives YES ONO 24 Do you consent to an investigation of your background including all records of every kind and description including police recorifs and to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and any other individual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control EYES ONO 25 If any answer to Questions 17 through 24 is"NO' attach a signed statement giving the reasons for such answers Alla FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT STATE OF 1 ss COUNTY OF //9(/` y /t Y1.1 7 BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HEREP,Y Printed name of applicant DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAi.IN() THE FURF, ui,J;OUESTIONN.HHE AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONIENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENT-, CONTAINED THERE(^ ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE / Signature //1 SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this /5 dos of K-,7 ) ne n o �l �J CnmmTee)nn ExpTrr'e ar 9 , t My Commission expires on Signature of NOTARY PUBL C _ _ ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (Pitjj' / -kkitY 4) ',".P - , k)-'),')-- 1 V\i' v M ITEM # MEETING OF r MOT I ON BY : qr sp SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO L .•. VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL v/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER xii , COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL 1 UNANI1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTALj - ITEM NO. 4 I MOVE THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 6 LIQUOR LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY MR. MACKAY ASHLEY, AGENT FOR CACTUS CLUB LOUNGE, BE RECOMMENDED FOR (APPROVAL/DENIAL) TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL. PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 527, PZ-28-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE (;fACHE JLti i �/ r JA �j #:1 i� A. -1R/zONP' COity o 04pache 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .0°1\ August 22, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL J THROUGH: , KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER " THROUGH: ,,tti CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: c. 'JULIE A. REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-28-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 527) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, not personally, but as Trustee of the Marie Arnold Trust REPRESENTATIVE: Ruth Armsby LOCATION: Between East 17th Avenue and East 18th Avenue on Wickiup Road CURRENT ZONING: General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING: General Commercial District C-3 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium/High Residential GROSS ACREAGE: 1 .25 acres NET ACREAGE: .8 acre '...... CURRENT LAND USE: one mobile home and one single family house SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - vacant South - vacant East - Apache Propane West - single family home SURROUNDING ZONING. North - General Rural GR South - General Rural GR East - General Business CB-2 West - General Rural GR Agenda Approved by �� SITE CHARACTERISTICS. unremarkable Date Item s Consent Agenda Public Hearing 22 7 Old Business New Business Postponed Item ��'���4 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CJaj COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 AG JA ITEM PZ-28-86 PAGE THREE The reasons for this recommendation are. 1 . It does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. 2. It does not have direct access to U.S. 60 and could place a burden on the undeveloped dirt roads. 3. It would set a precedent in an area of residential parcels and ''` developed trailer parks. Motion passed 5-0-0. STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE Applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33' ), the South thirty-three feet (33' ) , and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs at intersections. Additionally, staff would recommend the stipulation of site plan approval prior to commencement of construction. JAR.CRN:KC:jo HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 AGEND^'TEM PZ-28-86 PAGE TWO PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff notes this request does not comply with the General Plan designation for the site. Commercial development along Highway 60 is predicated on direct access to the Highway, this site does not have direct access. While the developer would be required to install offsite improvements, the Wickiup turn-off would not be paved and approximately 100 feet of roadway between Highway 60 and the subject site would not be paved. The site would have to provide adequate turn arounds required by many uses in the General Commercial District (C-3) . This would place this burden on undeveloped local dirt roads. Prior to filing an application, the applicant' s representative and staff discussed the different zoning classifications to determine the most appropriate classification for the site. Staff advised against a General Commercial District (C-3) classification and felt that any commercial classification was questionable. Adjoining property to the north will probably be developed as a commercial site. Property to the east has already been developed as a commercial site. The properties to the west would probably feel justified in requesting commercial zoning if this use were approved. The property to the south and southeast would remain residential under our current General Plan. As the current property owner is rezoning the subject site for the purpose of selling, no indication of the proposed use is available. Staff would recommend denial of the rezoning request. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the North thirty- three feet (33' ) , the South thirty-three feet (33' ) and the East thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoffs at intersections. Additionally, staff would recommend the stipulation of site plan approval prior to commencement of construction. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regulat meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, voted to adopt the following motion: (M/S Davies/Conway) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-28-86, an application of Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, not personally, but as Trustee of the Marie Arnold Trust, Alan W. Kral , Trust Officer, for her property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. PZ-28-86 ( GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT . 16th Ave. N,N VACA• TN .•. N C N VACANT N tiy944, N E. 17th Ave. I� y6O Nam\ ,)-3 -.7 N I I N MH SFH I N I CB-2 7/. z N I APACHE PROPANE N N E. 18th Ave. I--- — — — —l- _— I 1 N ( I IN I WICKIUP I N VACANT I MHP I I C-4 s' o TH I o aI � C � 1 I U I I 1 i ) . . 0 J � >E. 19th Ave. 3 C N I AM. I I N I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I E. 20th Ave. E,.,___ _ _ _ _ i_ _- - - _ —I � SUBJECT SITE j LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) I I I Scale. 0 200 400 • CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION .c� / (4 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: ' f / Parcel No. 1 From 6tk To C� — 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? 3. Size of your property: //94 tkracres t ) square feet 4. What is built on your property now? S4',,67 z L Ain ifS c. " /77 v,d/ L 6 f-/on1g 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? North l3 g C A N T South U A Q, fU T East NretFE2opFln.1r West (1)0P,ILE Nom ES 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: r �c�. , - / !o c ' o F ,.� l/., f F 1/q.- �� W 1/� W �'I o .r ec-1JoN 2 7- /ni - (Y' E 6 f S R rn . Section c,2 7 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 1. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? / 03 - c O - 0 0 7 g 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? ?rep e r•T Y ; S ;A) A -T r k S i PA) Plip r A J S o 2 S A t b 1 H 6 fi CS 7 }-} I G NES USC c c 'j}II rc+eer Ty t,lio« d h e -t- o h QommerciA Pu o_se . Ar9/'iA" ofFic / R6u. S2 7N/ S �2 [ f° Iit,j So LA),‹LA),‹ Q'A N IYIAeK& r -rff P 2T(. (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY • Case Number P7- ; 4) Si Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed (, • Application Received by: Receipt No. 0'72 Fee Amount Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 9. I/We do hereby cei ly that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other documents as proof of ownership. (r:_ b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and " associated d purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We bein he owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointedAj4,Utf , ,g75p Y as our repr- e tative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do •-ny hing necessa y to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of -pache Junc ...oi Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of th s =)•plicat •'0 fo .1 ) ontinental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, / a / of personally, but adllCruatee 9f the Marie Arnold Trust BY: AL I (Print O,+ner's Haw) (Sf" tun A an W. 'ra , Trust Officer 30 N. LaSalle Street (312 82.8-5961 ,(N ailing Address) Phone ' • r Chica o, Il 60697 (City, ate,,Zip Code) (2) (Print Owner's Have) (Signature) , (Mailing Address) (Plume Kuaber) (City. State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Have) (Signature) • (}{ailing Address) (Phone Humber) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) (Pr..,. 0 r': Naze) (Signatture - d iH+iNi:�` (}wiling Address) (Phone ' •••er �� • . "'••4. ',�i (City. State, Zip Code) •s �1 et e. �8 ��J STATE Theme nl g (nstnae s acknowledged •._to ,-i.; J--.. :�, SS. se (� GrC of �� , 19 'COItiTT.OF by: HE-4,0 f) AP? L' :,'':. � b�10N,: :o }b Cassission Expires: /,// //.P7 ate'!/ • . 1//• .," ,.. . •�•••''•'''''',., 10. I hereby certify that I have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all correspondence in this matter be wiled to a at their request. , Gt77i 741k/T hilt. r,�Pc'`� �(Print r resentat veis/ ) re o representatirt) • Q. Y , 'a {na '(fC 7700 �?iai I ingre s) (Phone nuaber) cr P �17 ty, tate, p e .:5.t-ter:t- --Y«•i. STATE (rum kh, (ore; In nstrueent w!s acknowledged before � P� -.LLA P' � �t day f ll 19 , My C 1 9, upires: 1J: 1); "r,ii�rr � ti Ai.^.,.:r, ,,� ,.�. ,,:c i9, 19)0 OTART PUBLIC ter,:.--< .. €-e . Pa-ga 2 o� PQp,CHF do 7- 1 ih i, Z U ��' "gPIZONP cOity o. C94pache &unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 29, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM: 4uCHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: �4� AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-28-86 - REQUEST FOR CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING I have reevaluated our position on this case. There is information and analysis which was not presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at their public hearing, which I believe warrants a staff recommendation for C-2 zoning for the subject site and may have had an influence on their decision. In addition, the applicant has not returned the required quit-claim deeds for roadway dedications, which necessitates a continuation of the Council 's hearing. Therefore, I would recommend the Council continue the public hearing on this case until September 16, and direct the Planning and Zoning Commission to re- hear the case at their September 9th meeting. If you feel another Planning and Zoning Commission hearing is not warranted, I will present our revised staff recommendation directly to the City Council at the September 16 meeting. CRN:ji 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 OIS ORDINANCE NO 527 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATTOIf ZN REZONING CASE l'Z-28-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-3 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, OnN ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as: the East 165 feet of the South of the Northeast k of the Northwest of the Southwest of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District, subject to the following stipulations 1) applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33'), the South thirty-three feet (33'), and the East thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoffs at intersections, and 2) the approval of site plan approval prior to commencement of construction. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F. Alexander City Attorney 4111*. ITEM NO. 5 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 527, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 527, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 527, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 527, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 534, PZ-34-86 '- 2 . WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6 . IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE � PQACHE G2 O CJ, _O U J�/4S' y f yoke Z 'QR,ZONP COity oe. 04pache 02unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT rlT z'il/-:. Agenda Approved by /.ik Date item # August 28, 1986 Consent Agenda -y Public Hearing //cr.} ' Old Business —..--- MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL New Business THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER Postponed Item FROM: �'' CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ✓v SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 PZ-34-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 534) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Keith Stachar, Kathryn Stachar, R.E. Christensen, Lillian Christensen REPRESENTATIVE• Keith Stachar LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of W. Superstition Blvd. and N. Ironwood Dr. CURRENT ZONING. Local Business Zone CB-1 PROPOSED ZONING: Local Commercial District C-2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Local Commercial NO. OF PARCELS: 1 NET ACREAGE. .73 acres CURRENT LAND USE: Multi-tenant commercial structure under construction SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - Ironwood Self-storage (mini-warehouse) South - Single family and mobile homes East - Mobile home park West - Multi-tenant commercial SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Business Zone by Planned Development CB-2/PD South - General Rural GR East - General Rural GR West - Local Commercial District C-2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS• No significant natural features, construction in progress 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982.8002 Honorable Mayor and C}.ty Council Agenda Item - SeptemL 16, 1986 PZ-34-86 August 28, 1986 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff notes that this request does comply with the General Plan designation .�. for the site. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 26, 1986, after public hearing, voted to adopt the following motion: (M/S Conway/Vanhoy 6-1-0 with Mrs. Davies dissenting) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Councl the approval of rezoning case PZ-34-86, an application of Keith and Kathryn Stachar and R.E. and Lillian Christensen for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CB-1 Local Business Zone to C-2 Local Commercial District. The reasons for this recommendation are• 1. It complies with the General Plan 2. It will be an asset to the neighborhood. " Mrs. Davies commented that "the message to the Council is that this is the third recent request for rezoning after construction has been started and I think that's a practice that should not continue." .m. CRN.jl PZ-34-86 REQUESTED REZONING FROM CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE TO C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT email mom 1•• •• wow am GR 0 o - ,v - CB-2/PD - PARK N IRQf�1+B C SELF 71�:o, - CASA DEL GR — — — VA CAt�NO = C-2 W. Superstition Blvd. -� _ r-...-,.... — — — -..— GR ( GR `CB- 1 Mi G R I C-2 YACAN j T USED FOR DIAL 1 7 SUBJECT SITE 0 1i0 300 600 FEET CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1.. -1/We hereby request-a change of -'zoning-class-ification fro: - Parcel No. 1 From e,� '1 To CZ 2 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? /O L CA g ea/il Z. 3. Size of your property: ,73//G /S/9 /47? [ ] acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? U/7(2:,1,,,i7- 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? (� 1 North if /;t//' .��C7!-r��%£ South /'c/a4,J/,L /��,Ic East ?41,/C ///d1we J 9/e,e West (P_/2 //1l Z<,7e ' /f 1/ ,S7Q4,9 PC 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: .S /9,5,�1p , f'.ss-7'c 9� t v- ��1/7.> 1' eV) CoUe� �,� cf-yi � , SUS r .cpL y /h, . (rl f�f SI-cm ,5-e,. /72‘,6"/". ,V,41 Section A" , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? /,0 3. 22972 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? lY/ eJU/ eQ� �_ S/J%7_ Ali/ .4 c,-u.zL (7' ',' a/4fc," zi LfSsS eie,,, r C , p2 �,�.+9s"/ /��y<<1-i,) (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number 7 -7 - ='-'-( 7- r. Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed ' 1_ << �- Application Received by. , ' __ Receipt No. t— -( Fee Amount �''- r ! (1) Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 ORDINANCE NO 534 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-34-86 FROM LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE CB-1 TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT C-2; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL ,^, The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as The South 195 21 feet of the East 270 feet of the South half of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from CB-1 Local Business Zone to C-2 Local Commercial District SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. David F Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / Oft (.1 4 j (2' P‘d' ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: IVe1 Y, S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER �.. COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL I UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL \i/ ROLL CALL VOTE SHE NOTES 0 Li / 4 ' ,... ,4 ( -) '4 U 1:11 ITEM # MEETING OF r NMOTION BY: o SECONDED BY'• `" P-) ' Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON fV COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ I COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO L! VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL V/ MAYOR HILL l i 1 f t UNANI"". US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ank ITEM NO. 6 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 534, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not r► unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 534, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 534, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 534, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 539 2- WILL THE DTRFCTOR OF I TRRARY SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM. 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE p ... PeACHE✓G "IRiZONP MpAackel)ttactickivgadicilintruf September 6, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES i i: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION OF POLICIES FOR USE OF THE LIBRARY'S PROGRAM ROOM--REQUEST FOR AN AGENDA ITEM FOR THE SEPTEMBER 16, 1986, CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Apache Junction Public Library Board of Trustees, at their regularly scheduled meeting of September 2, 1986, voted unanimously to submit the attached recommendations for use of the Apache Junction Public Library Program Room to the City Council. It is the Board's desire to see that the public has access to the program room, but at the same time that the program room be as well cared for as possible to ensure the library an attractive room in which to conduct its programs. We believe the points outlined in the policy will work effectively toward that goal. In compiling the recommended policy, members of the Library Board of Trustees and the Library Director examined policies which other libraries use to regulate use of their program rooms. The Board also made use of the currently applicable policy which governs the use of the Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce meeting room. Members of the Board of Trustees hope to be present at the work session preceding the September 16, 1986 Council Meeting to discuss the policy with you. Agenda Approved by ./,:,`.— Date Item 4 Consent Agenda Public Hearing .� "� __L.__ Old Business New Business _. Postponed Item 1177 N Idaho Road • Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 • Phone (602) 983-0204 rip.CHE's'\ '9,pIZOO' reickel)andkupa bkvalyz. Library Board of Trustees' Draft of Recommendations for LIBRARY PROGRAM ROOM USE POLICY I. PURPOSE The Apache Junction City Library is a public educational, cultural and entertainment facility. As such, it becomes necessary to ensure that the facility be made available to the public community as much as possible. Therefore, the following policies have been established to insure continual public access to the library, while still enabling special interest groups the opportunity to frequently use the facility. II. POLICIES 1) All regularly scheduled library programs will have priority over non-library programs. 2) No meetings will be allowed in the library, if there is any com- mercial intent or solicitation for profit or sales from the group or organization holding the meeting. 3) Requests for use of library facilities should be arranged at least ten days prior to the requested time; signed responsi- bility forms must be completed and returned to the Library Director by one week before the meeting. 4) Non-profit groups using the library facilities may be allowed to collect internal dues, provided it is not with commercial or profit-making intent. 5) No library services, facilities or materials may be used for fund raising without the express consent of the Library Director. No use of library audio-visual equipment will be permitted. 6) Organizations using library facilities are financially respon- sible for damages to such. 7) Regularly scheduled non-library programs must be approved by a majority vote of the Library Board of Trustees. No storage of equipment, supplies or materials will be permitted. 8) Organizations using library facilities are responsible for all clean up work and or costs resulting from such use. 9) No meeting shall be held in the library unless it is open and free of charge to the general public. 1177 N Idaho Road • Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 • Phone (602) 983-0204 r .. LIBRARY PROGRAM ROOM USE POLICY (page two) 10) A use charge is made so the the cost of making the room available will be shared by those using it. Ask at the library information desk for a copy of the schedule of fees. 11) The use charge along with a cleaning deposit of $10.00 must be paid at the time the key is picked up. The cleaning deposit will be returned when the key to the room is returned if, after inspection, the room is found to be clean and there is no damage -- the door been locked and the lights have been turned off. 12) NO SMOKING is allowed in the building at any time. Alcoholic beverages are not allowed in the building at any time. 13) Beverages may be served in the lobby area or courtyards, but are not permitted in the library program room. 14) User organizations, except Friends of the Library and City-related groups, must provide proof of current liability insurance. 15) Organizations using the program room must agree to hold the City of Apache Junction free of responsibility and without harm for any personal injury or damage of equipment, as a result of the use of the library facilities. (see use application) 16) The key for the program room must be returned to the City Clerk's office immediately after each meeting, no later than 10:00 a.m. the following morning after a night meeting. III. PROCEDURES These policies will be adhered to by the Library Director to insure fair and efficient use of the Library building. ill ob, AN Ilk TTT\, U �('J Z gti�� U� '1P/ZONP 0 APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY 1177 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Junction, AZ 85219 (602) 983-0204 FEE SCHEDULE FOR USE OF LIBRARY PROGRAM ROOM Class I -- No Charge Friends of the Library City of Apache Junction Departments Class II -- $5.00 per hour Local Service Organizations/ Non-Profit Organizations Class III-- $10.00 per hour State and County Governments and Agencies Colleges and Universities 1177 N Idaho Road • Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 • Phone (602) 983-0204 PepCHF�, a il . < � �_z q,plZONP Aittell ,ttfictian/guidici iktwiti APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY APPLICATION FOR USE OF PROGRAM ROOM Date Name of Organization Person Responsible Address Telephone Date Needed Time Period Needed Key Deposit Date/Time Pick-up Key Date/Time Key Returned Condition of Room Good Payment for use of room $ Fair Poor I have read the rules governing the use of the Apache Junction Public Library Program Room and I will be responsible for cleaning the room and promise to comply with all the rules outlined in the policy. I further agree to pay promptly any fees charged to me and/or the organization I represent. Our liability insurance is handled by the insurance agency listed below: Name of Insurance Agency Address Telephone Number Signed: Person Responsible 1177 N. Idaho Road • Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 • Phone (602) 983-0204 ON 'IN ORDINANCE NO 539 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY eiN OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY PROGRAM USE POLICY, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS. SECTION I IN GENERAL That certain document known as the CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY PROGRAM USE POLICY, three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, which was made a public record by Resolution No. 86-37, is hereby adopted as if fully set out in this Ordinance. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. 9 SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this li Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1986 NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• DAVID F ALEXANDER City Attorney IPP""Ml" E RESOLUTION NO 86-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE , , , , CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY PROGRAM USE POLICY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT 1 That certain document entitled CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY PROGRAM USE POLICY, three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, are hereby declared to be public record and said copies are ordered to remain on file in the office of the City Clerk 2. That certain document entitled CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY PROGRAM USE POLICY contains sections entitled PURPOSE, POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND FEE SCHEDULE FOR USE OF LIBRARY PROGRAM ROOM PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1986. NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST I ' [ I i KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk n APPROVED AS TO FORM' DAVID F ALEXANDER City Attorney ,QACHE O , _f7 4 `q�k „ �� .> Ivvimy�,��� ,L. U u rf 41 h; z "IRiZoNP cOity o . &4pac�Ce &unction September 11 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER i.,t/ SUBJECT: POLICY FOR LIBRARY PROGRAM ROOM USE At your September 16th meeting, you will be considering the proposed policy for use of the library program room as submitted by the Library Board. I have some concerns about the policy for use of the room in its present form. My most immediate concerns are: 1 ) The fee schedule for the use of city facilities of similar nature should be consistent. The proposed fee for the senior center is $5 per hour while the fee for the library program room is suggested to be on a sliding scale of $5 to $10 per hour. It would have been more equitable to use the proposed use policies for the senior center as a guideline rather than the Chamber of Commerce policy. 2) I do not feel the proposed charge of $10 per hour for state and county agencies, colleges and universities is reasonable. Many of these agencies are providing programs which are free of charge and of benefit to the entire community. Recently, the Central Arizona Association of Governments (CAAG), an agency in which the city participates, inquired about using the program room to conduct a hearing which was intended to gain input from the Apache Junction area. Under the proposed policy, they would have been charged $30-$40 to provide a community service. CAAG was referred to the school district which is providing a facility at no charge. 3) Having non-library programs approved by a majority vote of the Library Board borders on censorship and could delay use of the room if an applicant had to wait for the board to meet and vote on its request. It would be better to name the prohibited activities such as religious services or political programs and to require approval of these specific activates by either the board or the council . 4) I do not believe that the city can require that all meetings held in the program room be open to the general public. Private organizations 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 •.. RE: Library Program Room Use Page 2 paying to use a facility may very well have their own rules of operation. Other organizations may use the room for job screening or confidential hearings that are not for public information. 5) Regarding the "no smoking" policy, I would recommend that the council r. consider adopting a uniform policy that would apply to all city facilities with applicable penalties for a violation rather than to adopt a policy unique to one particular facility. I would also recommend that the use of illegal drugs be spelled out as being prohibited. 6) As in the use of other city facilities, the dollar amount of the liability insurance should be spelled out. 7) I would recommend use of a reservation form similar to that developed for the use of community services facilities. There may be other areas of concern that have yet to be addressed. I would recommend to the council that these policies be reviewed more thoroughly and that there be some consistency in the policies governing use of both the library program room and the senior center. Perhaps the problem could be resolved by having the Library Director and the Director of Community Services formulate a policy for both facilities where there are areas of similarity and bring the policy back to the Library Board and the City Council for review. Amok kmc 1I' p,CHF✓; At, ( ;, U j $ z g R i Z 0‘A P 64/2,ackeitutetiiatvguAlic Z-,iktCl up APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY APPLICATION FOR USE OF PROGRAM ROOM Date Name of Organization Person Responsible Address Telephone Date Needed Time Period Needed Key Deposit Date/Time Pick-up Key Date/Time Key Returned Condition of Room Good Payment for use of room $ Fair Poor i... I have read the rules governing the use of the Apache Junction Public Library Program Room and I will be responsible for cleaning the room and promise to comply with all the rules outlined in the policy. I further agree to pay promptly any fees charged to me and/or the organization I represent. Our liability insurance is handled by the insurance agency listed below. Name of Insurance Agency Address Telephone Number Signed• Person Responsible 1177 N Idaho Road • Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 • Phone (602) 983-0204 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION COMMUNITY SERVICES 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85219 PERMIT FOR USE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES FACILITIES FACILITY/AREA REQUESTED DATE(S) NEEDED (LIST EXACT HOURS REQUESTED ON EACH DATE) DATE HOURS DATE HOURS DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY NAME OF ORGANIZATION PERSON(S) IN CHARGE MAILING ADDRESS PHONE INSURANCE AMOUNT POLICY NUMBER COMPANY Permittee agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, ordinances, regulations and orders with respect to the use and occupancy thereof Permittee, during the term of this permit, covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless owner from each and every loss, cost, damage and expense arising out of any accident or other occurrence causing injury to or death of persons or damage to property due to the conditions of the leased premises or the use of neglect thereof by permittee Permittee further agrees to provide,pay for and maintain public liability insurance with both owner and permittee named as the insured Permittee agrees that it will pay for any unusual wear,tear, breakage or damage to facility occurring from the public or principals representing the permittee. Subsequent to use of the facility, maintenance staff will inspect the premises to determine that no unusual wear, tear, breakage or damage was done Should an inspection reveal damages,permittee shall reimburse the lessor for full costs necessary to restore facility to its condition prior to its use by permittee.The City reserves the right to refund payments made in advance for rental of any fa►ities,should the City decide the performance is not in its best interests,and cancel the use of the facility on the date or s specified in this permit. OTHER EQUIPMENT/SERVICES REQUESTED CHARGES OPERATION/MAINTENANCE FEES $ PERSONNEL FEES. $ CLEAN UP/DAMAGE FEES $ TOTAL DUE $ LESS REFUND $ TOTAL AMOUNT $ APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE - .. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES )1 / j "l ......, U / ir \ '° 17) #i \O\()) ct9 - ek' ' ''U' . (/* ITEf 1 # 1 MEETING OF 9 lib (\' Th''S MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : L,C101 IS NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ,,.. COUNCILMAN EIDSON _ / COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER ,ft COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ 1 / . COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO U MAYOR HILL UNANI"^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL j , ITEM NO. 7 S t_,i 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 539, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry;if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 539, BY TITLE ONLY. I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 539, AS READ BY Step 3 THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 539, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-37, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY PROGRAM USE POLICY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PUBLIC HEARING ••. 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 540 - YARD SALES 2 • WILL THE COUNCILMAN EIDSON SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE (---Qp.CHE. ✓ _� O 4' "ate o U ' • y qR/ZONP CM/y o L%vpac�2e C unction September 11 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER 01 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 540 -- YARD SALES REQUESTED BY• COUNCILMAN EIDSON The attached ordinance proposes to amend the city code by adding certain restrictions to those yard sales conducted on a regular basis as a business. Ordinance No. 540 would require that, in addition to obtaining a city business license, an individual operating a yard sale on a regular basis would also have to conduct the business within a screened or fenced area constructed of opaque materials so as to make the yard sale a more attractive addition to a neighborhood. All fencing or screening would be required to comply with city zoning regulations. This item will be placed on the September 16th agenda for your consideration. It has been written with the emergency clause so as to make it effective immediately upon adoption by six members of the council . Agenda Approved by -'� ``L- L-, kmc Date Item # Consent Agenda �- PublIc Hearing (' Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 rAs ORDINANCE NO. 540 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS, ARTICLE 8-7 YARD SALES, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY SECTION I IN GENERAL That the Apache Junction City Code, Chapter 8 BUSINESS, Article 8-7 YARD SALES, Section 8-7-3 Conditions Under Which Business License Conducted, be amended by adding Subsection B to read as follows• B. Any yard sale licensed as a business under the provisions of this article shall be wholly conducted within a screened or fenced area constructed of opaque materials. All such screened or fenced areas shall be constructed in accordance with applicable city zoning regulations SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the pro- visions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and adoption APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF 1986. NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES -*() .r\ '‘) CO /)Iji \A V ITEM # C. : a MEETING OF 1 /b A / MOTION BY : nV]f. SECONDED BY : ,4 - Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR i�► COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL I COUNCILMAN EIDSON 1 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER 1 COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ +/ i MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 4 / tC ), .- 6 ' ' ' -1 r VI )\ ITEM #_____q4 MEETING OF 1 POTION BY: SECONDED BY: 1 "NY Y S NO ABSTAINED . COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ / ^ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR �, COUNCILMAN BALJO ,✓ J . VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL J COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDE . MAYOR HILL J UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL J Ank Amak ITEM NO. 8 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 540, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) St01°%2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 540, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 540, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 540, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PQACHE ✓G�" ,, , t e N t4p6Salx '-- O o ,, ," r z'' , ' P/ZOO' it o pGGc`2e C unction September 11 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO• HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK 'J SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 529 (PZ-31-86) REQUESTED BY: COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER This item has been placed on the agenda for reconsideration in accordance with Councilwoman Gardner's request. At this time, due to the requirements for notification, it is appropriate for the council to only act upon the motion to reconsider. The motion should call for the item to be heard at a specific date in the future in order to allow contact with all parties concerned. Please keep in mind that the motion to reconsider can only be made by someone who voted with the prevailing side (Mayor Hill , Vice Mayor Bakkedahl , Councilmembers Baljo and Eidson) . An appropriate motion would be• "I move that Ordinance No. 529, PZ-31-86, be reconsidered. I further move that this ordinance be reopened to the public and heard at the regular/special meeting of . " If you wish to reconsider this ordinance, please keep in mind that the effective date is October 2nd. The next regular meeting of the council is October 7th. The city attorney will discuss the technicalities of such a reconsideration at the work session. Agenda Approved by `k 1 %- L 2 Date_— Item Da ,r Consent Agenda —_. kmc Public Hearing �_ Old Business / ) New Business —'"Pnet pored item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 O� P�ACHF�G2 6 _,,,,,,i.,V1?i..-'; :(Zf "qR/ZONP" c6it j o 04pache 02unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 25, 1986 C MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER W THROUGH: 0J CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: 'JULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-31-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 529) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Virginia Wilson LOCATION• south side of West Shiprock midway between N. Main Drive and N. Ironwood Drive CURRENT ZONING: General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING: Single Family Residence CR-2 (MH) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium/High Residential Opportunity GROSS ACREAGE: 1.36 acres t NET ACREAGE: 1.23 acres CURRENT LAND USE: One mobile home and one ramada SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - single family home South - mobile home East - Ironwood Mobile Home Park West - mobile home and sheds SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Rural GR South - Trailer Homesite TH East - Trailer Homesite TH West - Trailer Homesite TH Agenda Approved by SITE CHARACTERISTICS: unremarkable Date Item # Consent Agenda . Ts- Old Public Heanng !%,?', �, � Business '-� New Business --____ Postponed Item _____ 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZCNA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 8002 Am. �'► The Honorable Mayoi ,id City Council - PZ-31-86 - AS Ja Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Through changes in ownership, four lots of 11,000 square feet could be created from the 1.36 acre parcel . Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site and is compatible with surrounding land uses. Amok If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the North thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, adopted the following motion: (M/S Conway/Davies 4-1-0 with Mr. Vehon dissenting) "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-31-86, an application of Virginia Wilson for her property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. The reason for this recommendation is: 1. I cannot feel comfortable with private access roads." STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE The applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33' ) of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes. p JAR:CRN:jl .► .•. PZ-31-86 GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2(MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C W. Tepee 1 1 '-` 1 I TH I I I I Vacant I I I I I MH SFH I I Vacant I I I I I I I— — - - - - - - - - — --J W. Shiprock I-- -- - - - --I/ i -- -- - - - - - - - - - - cu ( I I MH MH I I 1 0 1 T I 1 Ironwood MHP I o I I Iti i Vac. Sheds 1 I I c a y I o s Vac. Vac. I �I TH I L^ 1 r_ I I 1 MH I 1 TH I MH I I I Z j I 1 TH MH I I 4 1 1 1 I MH 1 MH I i— ——- — — — — I I W Roundup St. ESUBJECT SITE i in 1 ; LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) N L J ( i JJ J I I 1 1 Scale. 0 200 900 411. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION C 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from. Parcel No. 1 From General Rural To CR-3 (' T7) 2 TH CR-3 (NH) 3 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for" ' nri,um / High nensity fnportunity 3. Size of your property: 1.35 (X] acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now" "anTTfnpturori ?Inme 5. What has been built on the property next to yours" North Home South ;'nnufantilreri Hnma East Travel Trailer Park West T'anufactureci 7nme 6. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: Parcel # 1 . E2Ni,4SWaNEaSra Parcel r 2. East Fifteen (15) feet of ANEiSbl ilr S'?-1� (: Section 18 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? 100-35-013D 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? This large a parcel is difficult to maintain, The area is not suitable to keep horses due to the proximity and density of the neighbors. The property would be better utilized as CR-3 (NH) and would be more marketable. (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number 1'2- 3/ 4 6 Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed "7-9- Y/ Application Received by: p Receipt No. 0 2 c Fee Amount , 7L' ( Z, Page I of 2 Revised 4/25/85 . 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) ( ) the owner of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other ( documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have 'truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non-refundable, the rezoning process to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the owners of the property in this rezoning application have appointed as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of this application form.) (I) Virginia Wilson 4(r ;;,;�, e.).c )1 (Print Owner's Name) ( ZSignature) 1835 W. Shiprock St. 983_1515 • (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) Apacr}e Junctt Zip Code] 85220 (2) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City. State, Zip Code) (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) (4) • (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Nunber) (City. State, Zip Code) STATE OF / 13/ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before SS me this 3b day of 0«r: , , COUNTY OF /di{t�LAL SEAL by 1 ',ifs/ii, pi •, My t HAROLD*Apace , ENGLIN �; y °�i'tb PpJynami -St a or nz /NOTARY Paurc4cam f Mg.0 P e�A tit Q I have been appointed by the property o' ner(s) in this l�I ��tn t'�k.aii,tia,epresentative and that all correspondence in this matter be mailed to me at their request. (Print representative's name) (Signature of representative) (Mailing address) (Phone number) ‘11 — (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before SS. me this day of , 19 CC191TY CF ) by My Commission Expires NOTARY Pi;BIIC Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO 529 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE-n-31-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ^ ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as Parcel No. 1 The East of the Northeast i of the Southwest } of the Southeast } in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and Parcel 2 The East fifteen feet (15') of the West of the Northeast } of the Southwest Ia of the Northeast I of the Southeast ; in Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone subject to the following stipulation The applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S. Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES7; ' V. p ITEf 1 # / MEETING OF (//1° POTION BY : S CONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANITMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEf 1 II MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL 1 UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL . .__-� ITEM NO. 9 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 540, BE RECONSIDERED. I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 540, BE DENIED OR APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PQACHF✓_ O �O� O U ti,� (� W z '4P/ZOX`Ok o f &Apache 09unctaan DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /t. August 26, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER/V FROM: ,jc'CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. 64. AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 SUNRISE R.V. RESORT On August 5, the City Council voted to continue the request by the owners of the Sunrise R.V. Resort to sell R.V. units to the general public from the development. An item of discussion was Arizona Department of Transportation licensing requirements. On August 6, I contacted Mary Williams of the ADOT licensing division. She stated that it was possible for them to license an R.V. dealer with the restriction that the units could be sold for initial installation in the development only. p CRN:jo Agenda Approved by -- Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business /`<,A7r /0 New Business Postponed Item — 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 8002 PQACHF✓G2 � r '9R/zOO' wit/ o. C pache 2unction August 6, 1986 TO: City Business Lccevse C.cetc . ,.b THRU: Director a b Public (UvnFzs FROAlk Deputy Zoning Admtin.istta tots RE: Sanitise RV Bus-mess License/1403 W. Broadway Avenue, A.J. , AZ Pursuant -to yaws request, thus is -to ven,c.;iy that the zoning at 1403 W. Bnvadway Avenue is TH/PT) (Tnattetc HamesLte bu P.canned Development) . Atthough zoning ceeanance was given ion Sanitise Joint ['entwce .to tent and sett necteatkonat vehicle tots within -hwc utanned deve.copmen t, zoning appnovat was not sought bon the setting a4 necneationat vehtceeS. (Mete this appnavat sought, the appnovat ion the sate ob necneat-Lonat veh.%cte4 and/on ttc.avee-ttc.aitetus wau.2d only be approved {ar those which wetce on .camas and bon use -c.n Sanitise R. V. Resort and only one ant wou.ed be ateowed -to be on one for/apace. Thetcebone, .the setting o; tecneatkonat ve.h cee4/travel---tca L etts to the genec.ae pubtic bon use at othetc -tocatLons wowed not be approved az a commute-Lae zoning cfass.ib.iccat-Lon would be nequuced bon this use. SG/ 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 PQACHFJG Re. , 7f r O� 4, 0 ,,',AN f3IS86 _ p U '. Z 1 gR/ZONP Vitt' 4 Apache 09unction Aar, TO: BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: 1+- 4 FIRE INSPECTOR SUBJECT. ZONING COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE When approved, this letter constitutes your ZONING COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE, Section , Ordinance number of the City of Apache Junction. Application is being made by: 1,AH4/0y 6,/(ipt PHONE. ?�3`� S �O to operate the following business: S � K C-5 �p R U 10 Psme T //////- to be located at: i 1710 p f trrye Cifd-/_Lly i` 4 7-, kn. $t S- 2-2.€ the nature of the business being• / t- )psi)S y - Sq /es RETURN TO: City Clerk This application meets the requirements of the Buil i g Department and the Department of Public Safety to operate in a r/�Q zone. Ar____ ZONING APPROVED ZONING DISAPPROVED FIRE DEPT. APPROVED FIRE DEPT. DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: Only one dwelling-unit on a lot. Sales of recreational vehirles are limited to units_ nn lots and for use in_ Sunrise R V Resort CITY CODE--SECTION _ t r,►iXXGOMM (IYIZONING ADMINISTRATOR DPS/FIRE INSPECTOR DWPUTY Janua y 14. l 9Rh 1001 North Idaho • Apache Junction Arizona 85220 Telephone (602) 982-8002 PQACNE✓ • O� � GyC� Am\ g- R ‘ o ? r. 'IPIZONA CC2tzj o Apache 09unctian TO: BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: February 12, 1986 FIRE INSPECTOR - SUBJECT. ZONING COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE When approved, this letter constitutes your ZONING COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE, Section , Ordinance number of the City of Apache Junction. Application is being made by: Sunrise Joint Venture PHONE: 983-2500 to operate the following business. Sunrise R.V. Resort to be located at: 1403 West Broadway, Apache Junction. AZ 852?0 the nature of the business being. Rental and Sale of R1 V. Socces RETURN TO: City Clerk This application meets the requirements of the Building Department and the Department of Public Safety to operate in a 77/1A zone. ZONING APPROVED N ZONING DISAPPROVED FIRE DEPT. APPROVED FIRE DEPT. DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: CITY CODE--SECTION: 7 r �lxE��7CC���G AL�� ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DPS/FIRE INSPECTOR DEPUTY February 24. 1986 1001 North Idaho • Apache Junction Arizona 85220 ' Telephone (602) 982-8002 /Or Agnak a i �i"X�aR 1 19N ° 1403 W. BROADWAY •APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85220 RV RESORT PHONE (602) 983-2500 August 21, 1986 The Honorable Mayor Hill Members of the City Council Apache Junction, Arizona Dear Mayor Hill and Council Members: This letter is written as a follow-up to our letter to you of July 12, 1986. After the council meeting of August 5, 1986, I felt additional clarification of our situation would be of help to you in reaching a sound decision regarding the request of Sunrise RV Resort's request for a variance or special use permit allowing the sale of National Prebuilt Manufacturing Corporation Park Model RV's from our rental/lot sales office. As stated during the August 5 meeting, it is not our desire to be a general RV dealer. We have no desire to sell travel trailers, over the road RV's, motor homes, tent trailers or park model homes manufactured by any company other than our own. We manufacture National Prebuilt Park Model RV's and these are the only products we wish to sell from the Sunrise location. At the present time, we have a model display set up at the Sunrise RV Resort, comprised of three model homes and an office, used for park model rentals and lot sales within the Park. All park model sales are being handled by a licensed dealer in Mesa, Arizona. The dealer is in no way affiliated in an ownership capacity with Sunrise RV Resort, or National Prebuilt Manufacturing Corporation. The relationship with the Mesa dealer is made necessary by the Department of Transportation requirement that all RV Dealers must be located within a commercial zone, which we are not. As you are undoubtedly aware, it is a common practice for RV dealers to show model units in RV parks, just as we are doing. It is standard practice for stick builders to maintain a sales office within a subdivision in which they are doing business. It is standard practice for a manufactured housing dealer to have a sales office within the park or subdivision that they are -2- developing. In either a stick built subdivision or a manufactured housing park or subdivision, it is not unusual to sell product in or outside the project or subdivision. Why then is our situation any different from the above? We own an RV Resort in which we are selling lots, just as in any subdivision. The protective covenants of record grant the developer the right to maintain a sales office within the development as long as there are unsold lots within the subdivision. The sales activities are no different whether we are selling park models, leasing park models, or selling lots to the public. As we are presently operating, the sales tax from any park model homes we presently sell is being paid to the City of Mesa. This is due to the DOT restriction, which says we cannot sell our product in the Sunrise RV Resort due to the present zoning. We presently must take our prospective purchasers from the display units at Sunrise, to the RV Dealer in Mesa to sell our park models. It is our desire to support the community which we are a part of. We would much rather see our Sales Tax dollars paid to the City of Apache Junction than to the City of Mesa. During the meeting of August 5, several points were brought out by various council memebers that I would like to address: 1) If a zoning variance is allowed, it would be unfair to the existing RV dealers: Response: Competition and free enterprise are what our country was built upon. It would be acceptable for our company to open a dealership on "the Strip". However, if we took that action the existing dealers would have two of us to compete with instead of one. Which do you feel they would prefer? We have invested in excess of $4,500,000 in your community in the Sunrise RV Resort. We provide anywhere from 8 to 25 jobs to community residents, depending upon the season. We spend literally thousands of our dollars, nationally, to attract visitors and residents to this City, who contribute tremendously to the economic stability of Apache Junction. We have made our facilities available to the community at no charge for various charity events. We have made available 464 RV spaces for RV dealers in the area to place their products upon. I believe the contribution and commitment we have made to this community far exceeds that which a general RV dealer makes in hard work, energy and dollars. We have created many opportunities and benefits to the City of Apache Junction. Is it fair to deny us the opportunity to do business in our community? -3- 2) If we have a sales location within our park it will jeopardize our resident's security. Response: Last February 23rd, we had a Grand Opening celebration which attracted over 6300 people in 7 .— hours. We have numerous dances and events in the resort on a year around basis which attract well over 100 people each. Our residents continually have guests and visitors in the Park. We are allowed to invite potential buyers in to look at our lots. All of these activities are proper in the eyes of the City. What is different about selling National Prebuilt Park Model Homes? I don't believe our potential purchasers are a criminal element. Further, our residents have voiced no concerns or objections. Aren't they the ones who should be concerned? Ironically, they are in support of our cause. 3) This is clearly a zoning issue, and the desired use is not in conformance to the existing zoning. Response: The American system was created to protect the citizens of this land. The American system came to be because of the unwillingness of "Mother Countries" to allow change within their boundaries. Our country has devised the existing political and legislative process' to allow progress to exist and to allow the structure to be changed for the betterment of it's people. If all existing laws, regulations, zoning and ordinances were cast in concrete, it seems there would be no need for the existence of government at the National, State or local levels. There would be no reason for this very City Council to exist. This body has, within the last year, granted at least one parcel of ground previously zoned Residential to be changed to Commercial. There may be others of which I am not aware. It is not unheard of to do what we are asking. In our situation, I am hard pressed to come up with any example of how granting this request will harm or jeopardize our residents, or the residents of Apache Junction in general. This City Council has the clear authority to grant us the opportunity to do what we are requesting. Once again, it is not our desire to sell any type of RV's other than National Prebuilt Park Model RV's. We have no intention of bringing in used vehicles, or stocking a vast number of "Spec Units". We have a park of which we are proud, and we pledge to keep it that way. If we are allowed to do what we are asking, the only difference in future actions, as opposed to the present activities going on in our resort, is that our customers would be able to purchase our units at Sunrise rather than having to travel to Mesa, and the sales tax created through these sales would benefit Apache Junction, not Mesa. -4- As I stated in the August 5th meeting, it is our desire to fully comply with the existing laws and regulations. We are agreeable to a variety of solutions. A special use permit could be granted allowing us to use Lot 185 , a lot which is approximately 35 ' x 55" and is presently our leasing offic and lot sales office for a Park Model Sales office. Another alternative would be to allow us to use one of the offices in our common area as a sales office for our park model homes. We would agree to a time restriction of 48 or 60 months as a limitation. We have no desire to continue selling National Prebuilt Park Models at Sunrise after the park is sold out. We would agree to formally restrict our RV sales to only National Prebuilt Park Model RV' s All we are asking is for the opportunity to do business within our own community, and to have our Sales Tax dollars benefit the community of which we are an active part. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter. Respectfully, iaryzi SUNRISE RV RESORT Randall L. Deming, Partner /r, /'kk O� PQACHE jo U y to jjr.:-14 z d4,p/ZONP `6'ity Cpache 079unctian DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN ilk July 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO- THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH:MICHAEL J. McNULTY, CITY MANAGER FROM: L CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM -AUGUST 5, 1986 MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUNRISE R.V. RESORT (PZ-17-83) NOT A PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION: West Broadway Avenue, east of Ironwood Drive SIZE: 35 acres net ZONING: Trailer Homesite by Planned Development TH/PD PROJECT. 484 lot RV subdivision, with recreational facilities and waste water treatment plant �► PROJECT HISTORY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PD APPROVAL: August 16, 1983 FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: December 6, 1983 CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: October 26, 1984 (for the RV spaces) September 20, 1985 (buildings) PROJECT ACQUIRED BY PRESENT OWNERS (Sunrise Joint Venture) . December 31, 1985 PREVIOUS AMENDMENTS: March 18, 1986. Major amendment to permit reduced setbacks on corner lots. Agenda Approved by /1*-r" Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 • MEMORANDUM TO: HONOR.LE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - AGPm4A ITEM - AUGUST 5, 1986 REQUESTED MAJOR AMENDMENT As indicated in the attached letter from the applicant, they are requesting permission to conduct RV sales to the general public on the premises for delivery to locations outside Sunrise RV Resort. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION Set up and sales of model home and establishment of a temporary real estate office to service sales in a subdivision is a typical and appropriate use within a residential subdivison for initial lot and dwelling unit sales. And, this is already being done at the Sunrise RV Resort. The request to sell RV's from this location to the general public for installations outside the park, I feel would be inappropriate, since this is the type of use which would be typically done in our CB-2 or C-4 zoning districts, and there is no location along Broadway Avenue that I would advocate as an appropriate location for an RV sales lot. Granted, their model home display and office is very tasteful , the appearance from Broadway Avenue is attractive and the model units are screened from Broadway Avenue. In reality, if someone were currently to come into their sales office and order a park model to be installed elsewhere in the City, it would be difficult for us to enforce this as a zoning violation. Similarly, it would be difficult for us to prohibit salespersons in a typical subdivision model home display from suggesting that the prospective customer consider another subdivision that the developer has if that particularly subdivision or homes do not meet the customer's preferences. What we can reasonably prohibit, however, is an overt commercial operation which includes signs or other ad- vertising announcing that sales for locations outside a particular development are possible from the location or that the location serves as a general purpose real estate office. In summary, it is my recommendation that the establishment of an RV sales operation within the Sunrise RV Resort would be inappropriate commercial .� use of the site. The TH base zoning district is a residential district, and the residents within the resort deserve the same level of protection from incompatible commercial uses as do residents of any subdivision. An alter- native available to the applicant would be to establish a sales office in a commercial district. CRN:j l Aar. Ask July 12, 1986 Members of the City Council Apache Junction, AZ Dear Council Members: It has come to our attention that we need to address the council regarding the sale of Park Models from our resort to the general public. We are the owners of Sun- rise RV Resort, 1403 West Broadway, Apache Junction, and manufacturer of National Prebuilt Manufactured Homes. We would like to ask for special permission from the City Council to sell our Park Models to the general Park Model buying public outside of our park. Please under- stand we are speaking of new units only. It is not our intention or desire to handle used units such as trade-ins. If we were asked to accept a trade-in, we would simply call a dealer for what is known in the industry as a buy bid and let the dealer have the used unit. Within our park we have installed twenty new Park Models mounted very uniquely at ground level. Of these twenty units we have three set aside as display units and one as a display and sales office as shown in the drawing. If you will check the drawing or come to the park for a visual appraisal you will discover that we do not have ample room for a regular sales lot or space to set used unit. We have invested a tremendous amount of money in the units installed in our park and feel this is very much an asset to the community. If you will check our re- sort, you will find one of the cleanest, best cared for resorts in the area. In surveying the area, we find dealers have set display units in most of the RV resorts and are selling units from that location. Because of the investment we have in our display models in our resort, we see no need to have a seperate sales lot out of the resort as most of the dealers do. Again, we are only asking for permission or revision of our planned development to allow us to sell our product to our own resort customers and to the general buying public. We would like to have a sign only as large as DOT requires and be able to put some advertising in the newspapaer to attract buyers. Thank you for your time and consideration. Since ly, Claude Ross General Manager kas Enclosure SUNRISE R V RESORT SJlIl1'lSe APACHE JUNCTION, ARZ RV RESORT f3RO..D AY I FRONT ENTRANCE ` - --_ __ I I I .... . 1 / % / -7 i ,.„, ._ Iz` ' / /1. - , , i t \ o ` >\ _ Z. ` .1 ..'':/ .. / _ice i I I i I^ (j/ \ 1\\ i I 1-1- 7 _ ___ •=- 0.1114/ i _ \•\ \\` _ -- - ! I 1 '' \ . • 1.j �/ yte. - E^../.... \ \ \N"--... \ \ \ PARK 110J_L ..1S?-:•. *---...''.*.\\-- / P ARK IVG ��---_1,i:. - \\ RESORT COMPLEX i - OFFICE COMPLEX - - 1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 01i(?(° 0 ,).) At , f wt , / .#/ \ f/ 1 ITEM # V MEETING OF /( MOTION BY: 1‘tftlriti SECONDED BY: 61 YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL o.., COUNCILMAN EIDSON / COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER / COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ ✓ / COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR / COUNCILMAN BALJO // MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL i); ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES s Y ,)„,), Y 1 yITEM # ( MEETING OF �" /Y1-4-aL MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO V VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ �J MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Amok i•►. ITEM NO. 10 I MOVE THAT THE REQUEST FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR SUNRISE R.V. RESORT, PZ-17-83, BE (APPROVED/DENIED). PQACHE ✓ 4 s ti O s n ,' #1 .; ,_ rr O kt 1 i5 - U1, 5 Z g 4P/ _ . ZONP 6ity o , ilIacf2e unction An. September 10, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER Y" SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO PERSONNEL BOARD Final action on appointments to the Personnel Board were postponed from an earlier council meeting because staff was unable to reach either Mrs. Seeman or Mr. Arnold to determine whether or not they wished to be reappointed to the board. Since the time the council originally considered this item at the special meeting of August 11th, we have been able to reach Mrs. Seeman and she has indicated that she would like to be reappointed. Messages have been left for Mr. Arnold, but he has not responded. Attached are talent bank applications which the council reviewed pre- viously as well as two new applications. The two new applicants will be invited to the September 15th work session in case the council has any questions. The other applicants had been in attendance at the August 11th meeting, but if you would like them to attend also please let me know. It is advisable to have a full personnel board available at all times in the event that any members are unable to attend hearings or cannot par- ticipate due to a conflict of interest. This item will appear on the September 16th agenda for your consideration. Agenda Approved byf �'-� Date Item # Consent Agenda __ kmc Public Hearing Old Business i/ /+rF New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ✓ -•irdp,cHE 2 0 ..,:i4.,1:Ai, ..„,,,,,,..,‘, lam ?� f-.A1F. , O /U Z V gR/ZoNP cOity on C4ache unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR G, J O UL BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: / /V— 746 NAME: f R4/i// v( /\/9'NJ/ v TELEPHONE: qr.? p 7/O (home) //�� / / ss�� (office) ADDRESS: /3 I j ,S, ( 'G�Q/�4/0 ZIP CODE: r` d" v�) OCCUPATION: /)L O Ri64 (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: p NOTE• As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/81 Signature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Qp,CH G ' 61) 11) (" OA eIN P`,'►? 1,?'-ti-,..'o, Itik #i L.- :..;k fib, Otilg 0 3let.-., t4.4:isia. z ,-.I.K - - � I' ! ' P/Z-00rx COit j o 'pache ZLnZction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Personnel dOARDD/ COMMISS ION/COPM?MITTEE DATE: August 19, 1986 NAME: Connie L. Knickerbocker TELEPHONE: 982-6876 (home) 982-1110 x 204 (office ADDRESS. 1760 West 9th Avenue ZIP CODE: 85220 OCCUPATION: Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent of Personnel (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION HS Diploma, MCC course in Quickhand, Self-taught in Computers and Word Processor PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Member-Apache Junction Booster Club, Member-Protect our Children, Past Co-coach of Apache Junction Little League Team, Have attended professional seminars on personnel, telephone usage and letter writing. ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: Have worked as secretary in Personnel for past 6i years. References: Gary Collins, William F. Wright, Neil Barwick Apache Junction Schools NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayot and Council Revised 6/19/31 Signature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAFiO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTICN,A2IZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACH E y ; . . �✓ t _,Ott O F°' : -0 ) '14)iZo0A `Oita on C uc/ze &2unction TALENT BANK APPLICATIO e,, FOR C-- -tc`ir\-fa, % 13--01/4 d BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: b t ! t 'J b C NAME• \ . TELEPHONE: o.- 5(1 Q (home) 1 a — a,00 S (office ADDRESS: LOI 1 v n'Y-uNau..U4 ) ZIP CODE. \ Cj Q, I l OCCUPATION: WA. 1� 'L `LU U� 1 11 7`R� INZAND� .. -Ai_+..�.� aSt.SLON (if retired, please ih icate former cccupation or profession) � 1l EDUCATION: ' �f,\ — \a i1,Q.\-1Z-b&JN-J\ k 1.� Z �\ co `, Cr4 ���,`�cam,7., W`Z �i\dL� lE cr \�' \! 111,Lk-e.,.. ) PROFESSIONAL AND/OR OMMUNITY ACTIVITIr.S. X - - `.,�\ ���� — t C,1� " `` \J c 4 ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES. A)(3.,)"\Ncy‘,o� 3\3\1-- .) el \ V\t \. NOTE: As a candidate to a Counci Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. I I _ \.3.fvN ,r, .A., ,\\.. 1Th n_31\-asi.) Revised 6/19/81 Signature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JJNCTUCN,AxIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982.8002 AQACHE✓G 011 OS 17,1 i ,,1,O.- ...,veivi,frnia, z VDity a C4pache 2unctian TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR "t�'C";o'�"\<P . BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE I • DATE: \\--J\ NAME: CZ�'�\C; � .Cx.L.: \ . TELEPHONE: —\ cT t'j) ) (home) C-'P.` , - L `5Ct (office r,• \ ADDRESS: \(, t.), ( �(M11 i CST ZIP CODE: j S 7 Z/'� OCCUPATION: KS\JEU 3 4' C77,�-5-. Jv\c2N)N, (if retired, please indicate former occupation"or prpfession) EDUCATION: c \' 0 \m \ ,C7 C-,c' F Lam\ C`<73. PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THISABOARD/COMMISS�ION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE �, c•^ �v C).9 \.•,J ,' \c...);\---jT-R..9,_". (` c1 \\C'� c`_`�- \CG C j \-\'-c n Ce::1\c-Q_ Cie cc--,:‘.0 '��\ CSC ,‘( €'C -r Li.)Q n L.'Y\ C' C'(C ;-.J•\C 11_tQ \ R.� "\:moo Cam`,,`\ 0( 1 c.1T-.ti_.'C1 k_�Y,c'_. . v ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: \� c'\ �`;3-r`si-, c.. '� 5_CI 1�"��\�cM .. NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. r-QTA\5`:J- 22E:7-- \\c--:-7iF- %----,---D--- - Signature of Applicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 65220 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-615.4 '` /'\ PQAC/1 tr- `fie. d4R, 00' OZt2 o (94pache 02unctaon TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR ' " it ,-' 't,' / c '." BO TTEc / DATE. 7 //s/c C' / V-_,, ( 1 1 �- 1 c it (home)NAME; �, � � TELEPHONE: J � � � / `s - G C e, C (off:.ce ADDRESS. 4' 2 5---- 2,r-', ram' V-4-,V. 'a ZIP CODE: '‘-5" ,-' 7 ') OCCUPATION: )G .o P , (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) ZIK/ � V ,�EDIICATZO � 7v �' �' �I: /v� / PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COK1UNITY ACTIVITIES. �C'c'° /4--+ �+ "6-' // 7+" ' ADDITIONAL PERTINEN INrOrMATION/REFERENCES: C-i"C /i _ic'4 -r / ` / I outs ? : /( i 0( 4 1 NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the,) Mayor and Council. ,7 - / ( / Revised 6/19/81 Signature cofLtCpplicant \\\ 1C01 NCRTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 11!%ijip,CHE .Kn / .,...,,,..,.. :.. 2 --s.. gRIZ..e. ONP cOZt y o 0 Jcclie C2uunzction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR R.?/_5 0 /V/?- BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 3— July /M9 NA`E: 047,/27,a4/ e,C A /4 C'01. RL/i1/ TELEPHONE: F,'3 -/5 3 4;.t (home) S /� -7 z (office O�ADDRESS: / j _E, Scprli,c b,e - A,J. ZIP CODE: _ fSa/ 9 OCCUPATION: P,ItJL G�:.)C(R/7z4 S 4 g , c s 4Poi- !\E.TI, ems( (if retired, pleas /indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: 4Uh ScArlc'l — l y2 eo/4'Ae — /2?,4-lo - Soa/o/UJv • PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO:1.`SUNITY ACTIVITIES- ,MvP_ beee) 04J /q4 Z &I' 74r/2 foil 4- (2&17/n /SS /0/) eiN ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES• /.06P ,,,tJTly 0 ti 6 1: iy9 04 0,10-1-1 �1 GF bleeek/� — Se. �- Spec� ,AL Opt)1�4�,e4) @drhrn,//e NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that 1 cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council ,;7(/;4// --;r7 (-1 /./.- Revised 6/19/81 Signature ,df Applicant 1C01 NC21H I::Ar'C :CAD • APAC4E JJNC,CN.ARI2CNA852_0 • 1ELE?iCNE(602)982 8CO2 �c PeAC�H���G2 U r,. Z gRIZ' Np. •Qit y o� 07. 72aclle �ztncti ` on o TALENT BANK APPLICATION -- FOR : -- - /�-21 e."( BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 2 -s -6 P k NAME: .. ifs Cam/ il.2 TELEPHONE: f,c?3 - 'l f'-Z/ (home) / (office ADDRESS: i'yO 3 Z', uZL.:4,Z�1 ZIP CODE: S.2:2 C OCCUPATION. ,,,17:7!,":4-„ ✓,,..`'e;`+,d,. - (if retirl jplease indicate/ rmer occupation or profession) f /�EDUCATION: C/ 1 , .,•c.,• � � „ PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMUNITY ACTIVITIES. . .4%t 11 . •/%r -���-;:- LI ADDITIONAL PERTINENT. INFORMATION/REFERENCES• ?�.,•-L �Y. 'J7 v, ,/,./0,--G--)--;-, - ,4-rA-,J/ 4->/'-eze-e — rN SsZeol N ,.. '7,!;72 candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Corn ittee, your name, ad ress, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. /I Revised 6/19/81 Signature of,/Auplicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / )1 14;1 AP \.) ITEM # � MEETING OF NOTION BY ; r CrSECONDED BY ; YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR // MAYOR HILL UNANI""OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 1 n^►. OMW 4134116. ITEM NO. 11 I MOVE THAT Cal2 AND BE APPOINTED TO THE PERSONNEL REVIEW BOARD. i0c i\CHE✓G.AIt40 6 .4:,74. 1 ,r,,,,,,..,,... :.' ' g i. 1 '41RizoNP caty o c ipache unction September 8, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER e, FROM: CONTROLLER /l.L SUBJECT: ITEM FOR SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 COUNCIL AGENDA Due to the tax reform bills passed by both houses at Congress, the Arizona Municipal Financing Program (AMFP) was created to give a cost-efficient alternative for financing bond issues and/or lease-purchase programs. This is a three (3) year program that the City has the opportunity to be a part of with no penalty or liability should it be unable or opts not to finance under the AMFP program. In order to take part in this program, the City must sign up by October 1, 1986. Attached is some information on the program, an appropriate agenda statement, a resolution and a copy of the IGA. It is tentatively set to have Mr. Harry PerneZZ of Rauscher Pierce Refsnes here for the work session of September 15, 1986 to give you additional background and answer any of your questions. JLK:mas Attachments Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda ---- Public Hearing — Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 AGENDA STATEMENT If a municipal entity wishes to consider participation in the Arizona Municipal Finance Program, it should utilize the following statement in its agenda: "To consider and if deemed appropriate, to authorize participation in the Arizona Municipal Financing Program." If the entity finds it appropriate to become a participant, it should adopt the program Resolution. That Resolution should be completed and executed as should the Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Goodyear, the lead municipal unit. One(1 ) copy of the Resolution and two(2) copies of the final page of the Agreement (Annex l) bearing actual signatures should then be forwarded to Mr. William Hicks, Snell & Wilmer, 3100 Valley Bank Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85073. I ARIZONA MUNICIPAL FINANCING PROGRAM FOR ARIZONA CITIES, TOWNS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS FACILITIES, SITE ACQUISITION AND EQUIPMENT Introduction of the bond issue, a rebate of the excess interest earnings must be made to the The Arizona Municipal Financing Federal treasury. Program (AMFP) offers Arizona cities, towns and school districts a cost-efficient As a consequence, the pending tax alternative for financing bond issues and/or reform legislation will restrict bond fund lease-purchase programs. AMFP has been investment and debt service offset developed and is being offered by Rauscher opportunities. Pierce Refsnes, Inc. as senior managing underwriter and Young, Smith & Peacock, AMFP has been created to preserve the Inc , as co-underwriter advantage of unrestricted bond proceeds investment until July of 1989 without the Program Need need for reporting or rebate Additionally, the structure and credit enhancements of (1) Preservation of Debt Service Offset AMFP contribute to highly competiti\e Opportunities Cities, towns and school financing prospects for all bond issues under districts have traditionally invested bond issue AMFP structure proceeds at unrestricted interest rates until expended or for up to three years as (2) Lower Lease-Purchase Financing Costs permitted under the current tax code. This Financing charges for most traditional interest is then deposited to the bond lease-purchase programs have al‘‘a\s principal and interest (debt service) exceeded the interest rate costs associated repayment accounts to lessen subsequent debt with bond programs. This differential stems service requirements. Such interest earnings from certain budget constrains and related can be significant in terms of their amount security limitations that are inherent to the and to reduce debt service tax rates. lease-purchase concept Obviously, this differential makes lease-purchase a more Provisions of the tax reform bills passed expensive dollar-for-dollar financing vehicle by both houses of Congress alter this traditional investment practice After the AMFP provides for a reduction of the effective date of the pending tax reform financing cost difference between lease- legislation, only those cities, towns and purchase and bond programs. It is estimated school districts that are able to expend the that interest rates for AMFP lease-purchase total of their bond issue proceeds within six financings will be 2% to 3% below current months of delivery will be permitted to invest lease-purchase rate levels such funds at unrestricted interest rates Very few issuers are expected to be able to Financing Concept meet this requirement. The AMFP program involves the Those cities, towns and school districts issuance of a "master" bond issue in a unable to expend all bond moneys within the principal amount that essentially represents six month period will be required to the expected financing (bond issue and systematically report bond issue interest costs lease-purchase program) needs of its and the investment rate earned on participants during the next three years plus unexpended proceeds, if the investment rate a reserve fund. The AAA rated master issue of unexpended bond proceeds exceeds the rate has been marketed to an institutional _ — investor on a seven-day variable rate basis. construct new facilities, make additions and -*• Such variable rates are presently quoted at improvements to existing facilities, furnish approximately 4-1/2%. Proceeds of the master and equip such facilities and make site issue have been invested as is allowed by the acquisitions present tax code in securities yielding as much as 3% more These securities are held Additionally, the program may be used in trust The difference in interest rates to finance annually renewable lease-purchase (arbitrage) enables a positive cash flow which, agreements involving such items as portable in combination with the issue's structure, will buildings, relocatable air conditifiwking provide the funds for debt service and systems, automobiles, trucks, es, possible additional interest earnings to offset computers, telephone systems, furnishings financing costs for up to three years and other equipment as permitted under Arizona law Subsequently, as AMFP participating cities, towns and school districts require Term of Financings funding for lease-purchase programs and/or voter authorized bond issues, securities held Participating cities, towns and school within the master trust will be liquidated and districts may structure their debt repayment their proceeds "drawn down" to fund the schedules in accordance with their particular individual financings These ultimate desires up to a maximum of 20 years financings are anticipated to be at highly competitive fixed interest rates Lease-purchase financings would have a maximum term equating to 80% of the useful life of the property involved AMFP participants may originate bond issue and/or lease-purchase financings to the extent of their participation during the three Interest Rates year period ending July 1989. After having done so, each participant will service its As previously noted, interest rates on debt(s) according to the terms of its AMFP bond issue and lease-purchase individual bond issue or lease-purchase financings will be highly competitive agreement. If any of the master issue However, if better financing terms can be proceeds remain (is not "drawn down") after secured than those offered by AMFP, the the three year origination period, an AMFP terms may be rejected Howevep....we equivalent portion of the master issue will believe that this is most unlikely. self-liquidate. Liability As the master issue was finalized under the current tax code, those AMFP participants that fund bond programs within If a participant is ultimately unable or the AMFP structure will have the opportunity opts not to finance under the AMFP to invest their unexpended bond proceeds at program, there is no penalty or liability. As unrestricted interest rates until July of 1989. previously indicated, any amount of unused Tax code revisions expected after the master issue funds will self-liquidate at the enactment of tax reform legislation will not finish of the three year period allow this investment practice. AMFP participating municipalities will be liable only to the extent of the Program Uses financings they originate within the AMFP structure There is no cross liability for The \MFP program can be used to financings originated by other cities, towns finance voter approved bond issues to or school districts. / Qualification AMFP Participation r In order for a municipality to be a In order to qualify as a AMFP AMFP participant, it must maintain the participant, a municipality must maintain at minimum bond rating or ratings previously least a Moody's Investors Service and/or discussed and must adopt a resolution as Standard & Poor's Corporation Baa bond soon as possible that authorizes its rating. The qualifying bond rating standard participation in an Intergovernmental is not arbitrary Participant bond ratings are Agreement which establishes AMFP necessary to satisfy requirements set forth by the insurers providing credit enhancement to the master issue in order to achieve an AAA Miscellaneous rating for the issue The AAA master issue rating is made possible based upon bond insurance and/or a bank letter of credit A municipality's participation in AMFP guarantee. is optional INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT RELATING TO ARIZONA MUNICIPAL FINANCING PROGRAM This Agreement, entered as of July 16, 1986, be- tween The City of Goodyear, a municipal corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona (the "Lead Participant" ) and the cities, towns, counties, school dis- tricts and other political and subdivisions of the State of Arizona which become parties hereto from time to time as set forth on Annex I (the "Participants" ) , WITNESSET H: Whereas, each of the Participants, including the Lead Participant, Ls a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, and Whereas, each of the Participants is required from time to time in the performance of its governmental activi- ties to acquire various capital assets and to finance the acquisition of such assets by the issuance and sale of gener- al obligation or revenue bonds or by the execution and deliv- ery of lease-purchase agreements, and Whereas, the interest rate and associated transac- tion costs of such financings represent significant expendi- tures of public moneys and are a function of the credit-worthiness of the individual Participant; and Whereas, the Lead Participant has arranged to enter ,... into a lease-purchase agreement (the "Program Lease Agree- ment" ) and for the execution, sale and delivery of certifi- cates of participation pursuant thereto in order to provide funds to finance the Participants' reasonably-expected capi- tal expenditures, whether by lease-purchase or bond issuance, from time to time during the period from the date hereof through July 15, 1989; and Whereas, the certificates of participation, in the principal amount not to exceed $500, 000, 000, will be secured, and the credit thereof enhanced, by a letter of credit and by a policy of municipal bond insurance, in each case rated "AAA" by a recognized rating agency, the effects of which are expected to lower the customary interest and financing costs and, by funding all such reasonably expected capital expendi- tures in a single transaction, substantially reduce the asso- ciated transaction costs; and ow ow Whereas, such reduction in financing and transac- tion costs in connection with the Participants' capital ex- penditures will benefit the citizens and residents of the various poLitical subdivisions, and generally, of the State of Arizona, Now, therefore, in consideration of the terms and i•. conditions hereof, the Lead Participant and the Participants mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE I Section 1 . 01. Definitions. Unless the context or usage clearly indicates another meaning or intent, the following terms shall have the following meanings "Certificates of Participation" means the certifi- cates executed and delivered pursuant to the Trust Agreement in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $500, 000, 000, representing undivided interests in the trust estate and the program payments pursuant to the Program Lease Agreement. "Intergovernmental Agreement" means this agreement, dated as of July 16, 1986. "Lessor" means Rauscher Pierce Refsnes Leasing, Inc , an Arizona corporation, and its lawful successors and assigns. "Origination Date" means each interim date prior to July 15, 1989 on which Participation Leases may be originat- ed, executed and delivered. "Participant" means the political subdivisions of the State, including the Lead Participant, from time to time listed in Annex I hereto. "Participation Bonds" means general obligation or revenue bonds issued by a Participant and sold to the Trustee. "Participation Lease" means a lease-purchase agree- ment between the Lessor and a Participant in substantially form set forth as Exhibit C to the Trust Agreement "Program" means the Arizona Municipal Financing Program of the Lead Participant and the other cooperating Participants, as described and contemplated herein. -2- "Program Lease Agreement" means the Program Lease Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1986, between the Lead Participant and the Lessor. "Trust Agreement" means the Trust Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1986, between the Lessor and the Trustee /°1 "Trustee" means, initially, The Valley National Bank of Arizona and, thereafter, any successor trustee ap- pointed pursuant to the Trust Agreement. "State" means the State of Arizona. Section 1.02 . Interpretation. Unless the context indicates otherwise, words Importing the singular number include the plural number and vice-versa, the terms "hereof" , "hereby" , "herein' , "hereto" , "hereunder" and similar terms referenced herein; words of any gender include the correlative words of the other genders, unless the sense or context indicates otherwise. ARTICLE II Section 2.01 . Program. The Lead District agrees to enter into the Program Lease Agreement, to approve, and cause the Lessor to enter into, the Trust Agreement with the Trustee and to cause the Certificates of Participation to be executed, sold and delivered against payment therefor. The proceeds from such sale and delivery shall be deposited with and invested by the Trustee until such time, not later than July 15, 1989, as portions thereof are disbursed to purchase Participation Bonds or Participation Leases as contemplated herein. Section 2. 02. Qualification of Participants Any city, town, county, school district or other political subdi- vision of this State may apply to the Trustee to fund its capital expenditures under the Program subject to the follow- ing conditions. a. The city, town, county, school district or other political subdivision desiring to participate must first become a Participant hereunder by the execution and delivery to the Trustee, and the acceptance by the Lead Par- ticipant, of an Annex I in the form attached hereto. b The city, town, county, school district or other political subdivision desiring to participate must have a then-current rating of at least Baa from Moody' s Investors Service, Inc. or at least BBB from Standard & Poor' s Corpora- tion, or an equivalent credit in the judgment of the Credit — — -3- Provider (as defined in the Trust Agreement) , subject further to the provisions of Section 2 . 03 hereof. I' c. In the case of school districts, the Trustee shall have received satisfactory evidence that this Agreement has first been approved by the State Board of Eduction as required by A R. S §11-952 A d. The city, town, county, school district or other political subdivision desiring to participate shall deliver to the Trustee such evidence as the Trustee may rea- sonably require as to the power and authority of such city, town, county, school district or other political subdivision, the authorization, execution and delivery of Annex I to this Agreement by the city, town, county, school district, or oth- er political subdivision, and an opinion of counsel to the city, town, county, school district or other political subdi- vision, as the case may be, as to the requisite power and authority of the city, town, county, school district or other political subdivision desiring to participate, the author- ization, execution and delivery of Annex I to this Agreement by the city, town, county, school district or other political subdivision and the validity and enforceability of this Agreement. Section 2 03 . Applications for and Receipt of Funding Having qualified as a Participant in this agreement in accordance with Section 2 02 hereof, such Participant may then apply to the Trustee for funding of any capital expendi- ture, whether by bond issue or lease-purchase agreement, sub- ject to satisfaction of the following conditions a. The Participant shall submit to the Trustee an application for funding detailing the nature of the property to be acquired, the total cost thereof (including installa- tion) and, in the case of Participation Leases, the expected date of the Participant' s receipt of the property to be ac- quired, which shall be the date of funding. b In the case of a school district' s execution and delivery of a Participation Lease or the issuance of Par- ticipation Bonds to finance the purchase of land and/or buildings, evidence that such acquisition has been approved by the voters pursuant to applicable law. c In the case of an acquisition by Participation Lease, the Participant shall provide to the Trustee accept- able evidence that the Participant is rated "A" or better by Moody' s Investors Service, Inc or Standard & Poor' s Corpora- tion, or an equivalent credit in the judgment of the Credit Provider (as defined in the Trust Agreement) —�1 - -4- — ems d. The Participant shall provide to the Trustee such further items, documents and information as are required by Article VII of the Trust Agreement. e. Subject to funding approval, the Trustee shall advise the Participant at the earliest possible time of tht� net interest rate on Participation Bonas or Participation Leases and, if accepted by the Participant, shall disburse at the next succeeding Origination Date directly to the Partici- pant, or its trustee, with respect to any Participation Bonds or to the vendor or lessor with respect to any Participation Lease. Section 2 .04. Limited Liability. No Participant shall have any liability or obligation hereunder or in con- nection with the Program except to the extent any such Par- ticipant applies for and receives funding for a capital expenditure through the Program, whether by delivery of Par- ticipation Bonds or a Participation Lease, in which case the Participant' s sole obligation will be to comply with the terms and conditions thereof In no event will any Partici- pant become liable solely by reason of participation in this Program, for the obligations of any other Participant under the Program whether by bond issue or lease-purcnase agree- ment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, participation in this Agreement will not relieve any Participant of any obligation or responsibility imposed upon it by applicable law. ARTICLE III Section 3 .01. Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the earlier of (a) the full elin ! payment and discharge, or provision for the full payment and discharge, of all Participation Leases and Participation Bonds pledged to and held by the Trustee, or (b) July 1, 2019. Section 3 . 02 . Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State. Section 3 .03 . Notices. Notices, consents and oth- er communications required or permitted hereunder will be deemed sufficient if given in writing addressed and mailed by registered mail, or delivered to the party for whom intended, as follows -5- --- — — -- To the Lead Participant The City of Goodyear 119 North Litchfield Road Goodyear, Arizona 85338 To the Trustee The Valley National Bank of Arizona Corporate Trust Department (A-804) 201 North Central Avenue P 0. Box 71 Phoenix, Arizona 85001 Section 3 .04 Amendments This Agreement may be amended, waived or terminated only by written agreement of all Participants Section 3 .05 Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Partic- ipants from time to time hereto and their respective succes- sors and assigns. Section 3 06 Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute a single instrument. Section 3 . 07. Entire Agreement. The foregoing Agreement expresses the entire understanding and all agreements of the parties hereto, and no party has made or -6- — y shall be bound by any agreements not expressly set forth herein. THE CITY OF GOODYEAR By /s/ Chauncy B Coor e Mayor Attest: /s/ Stephen Cleveland City Clerk Approved /s/ William A. Hicks, III Special Counsel State of Arizona ) ss County of Maricopa ) The foregoing Intergovernmental Agreement was ac- knowledged before me this 16th day of July, 1986, by Chauncy B. Coor, the Mayor of the City of Goodyear, Arizona, on behalf of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and of- ficial seal. /s/ William A Hicks, III Notary Public My Commission Expires: April 3 , 1990 /, ANNEX I Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2 .02 of that certain Intergovernmental Agreement Relating to Arizona Munici- /S pal Financing Program, dated as of July 16, 1986, (the "Agree- ment") , among The City of Goodyear and the Participants named in Annex I thereto, including the undersigned, the undersigned hereby agrees to become a Participant in the pooled financing Program described therein and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and conditions thereof . Dated: , 1986 . (Acting) Mayor of the City of eiN Attest: (Acting) Clerk Approved: Special Counsel ar*Tnir RESOLUTION NO. 86-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, RELATING TO FINANCE, AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN ARIZONA MUNICIPAL FINANCING PROGRAM AND EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is required from time to time to acquire capital assets for use in performing its governmental purposes, and WHEREAS, the acquisition of such assets may be financed by the issuance and sale of general obligation or revenue bonds and/or by the execution and delivery of lease-purchase agreements; and WHEREAS, the Arizona Municipal Financing Program has been established pursuant to an Intergovernmental Agreement, dated July 16, 1986, among the City of Goodyear and the various Participants named in Annex I thereto, a Program Lease Agreement and a Trust Agreement (copies of which have been presented to the Mayor and City Council) to provide pooled financing for the reasonably expected capital expenditures of Arizona municipal corporations and political subdivisions during the period ending June 30, 1989 in order to reduce the financing and transaction costs associated with such capital expenditures; and WHEREAS, the City desires to participate in the Arizona Municipal Financing Program by becoming a "Participant" for the purposes of the Inter- governmental Agreement, and WHEREAS, it is necessary that this City take immediate official action to establish its participation in the Program in order to preserve certain of the benefits available thereunder, which benefits could become unavailable under the provisions of Federal tax reform legislation presently pending in the Congress of the United States, NOW, THEREFORE, be it, and it is hereby resolved by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, as follows 1. This City hereby elects to participate in the Arizona Municipal Financing Program 2. The appropriate officers of the City are hereby authorized and empowered to execute and deliver such agreements and instruments as may be necessary for this City to become a participant in the Intergovernmental Agreement in substantially the form presented to this meeting 3 This City hereby designates Snell & Wilmer, Attorneys-at-Law, as special counsel to the City for purposes of approving its participation in the Intergovernmental Agreement 4. The immediate effectiveness of this Resolution being essential to insure to the City the maximum benefits of the Arizona Municipal Financing Program, an emergency is declared to exist and this Resolution shall be effective immediately upon the adoption hereof in accordance with applicable law PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 NORMAN S HILL MAYOR PAGE ONE OF TWO ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY CITY CLERK .... APPROVED AS TO FORM. DAVID F ALEXANDER CITY ATTORNEY RESOLUTION NO 86-36 PAGE TWO OF TWO aj .••. .... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ...., ,v 0 /3 ct C(j)/j a ITEM # MEETING OF ite MOTION BY: ,�1 kill SECONDED BY : ` ?)' ' ' �1d B Y S NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL / COUNCILMAN EIDSON V Ailinik COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ ` � COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL I 1 UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ink r= .01114, ,.r ITEM NO. 12 I MOVE THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-36, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY OCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, RELATING TO FINANCE; AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN ARIZONA MUNICIPAL FINANCING PROGRAM AND EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. U �d1�, .A Z I 1 q,p/ZONP 62 2ty on C pache unction September 9 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER � il 1 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK FROM: OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT Cull REGARDING: BIDS FOR STREET STRIPING, FUEL, CRACK SEALANT, PAVING MATERIALS, SAND AND AGGREGATES, BRUSH CHIPPER, POWER SWEEPER AND CHIP SEAL. Bids were opened on September 8 , 1986 , at 10 : 00 AM for the Street Striping, Fuel, Crack Sealant , Paving Materials , Sand and Aggregates , Brush Chipper, Power Sweeper, and Chip Seal. A total of twenty-one ( 21 ) bids were opened. Bids having been received and reviewed indicated lowest , and best qualified bidders to be as follows : I STREET STRIPING Precision Striping @ $ . 055/ft . of stripe Asinkk II FUEL Mesa Fuel Company Premium Unleaded Gas @ $ . 8475/gal. Diesel . 470/gal. III BRUSH CHIPPER Vermeer @ $15 , 995 . 00 . IV CRACK SEALANT Agenda Approved by r1 /V, Road Maintenance Supply @ $ . 202/lb. Date 'Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business " rL 0 - I Postponed Item ioc.i OI}T HO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)9e2-6002 V SAND AND AGGREGATE Cashway Concrete and Materials ABC - Delivered @ $ 3 . 90/ton - F.O.B. @ - 2 . 50/ton Sand - Delivered @ $10 . 00/ton - F.O.B. 7 . 50/ton Select - Delivered @ $ 3 . 65/ton - F.O.B. 2 . 20/ton Slurry - @ $42 . 00/yd. VI PAVING MATERIALS Union Rock 3/8" - Delivered @ $22 . 90/ton - F.O.B. 17 . 95/ton 3/4" - Delivered @ $23 . 90/ton - F.O.B. 18 . 95/ton D1/2 - Delivered @ $23 . 90/ton - F.O.B. 18 . 95/ton VII POWER SWEEPER Copper state @ $20 , 450 .00 VIII CHIP SEAL Nesbitt Contracting 3/8" Chips with RS-2 2% latex @ $ . 96/sq.yd. 1/4" Chips with RS-2 2% latex @ . 96/sq.yd . See attachment . I recommend acceptance of the lowest , best qualified bidders as described, based on the following information: STREET STRIPING - Four ( 4 ) bids were received. PRECISION STRIPING was recommended because of their bid being lower by $ .015 per foot . This is a savings to the City of approximately $2 , 250 . 00 . Precision has striped for the City of Apache Junction for the past three ( 3 ) years and their service has been acceptable. II FUEL - One ( 1 ) bid was received. MESA FUEL served the City of Apache Junction in 1984-85 , during which time we had no problems . They gave us same day delivery, and once delivered on a Saturday, when we ran low. The price given to the City is lower than we are now paying and the vehicles actually run better on Mesa' s gas . III BRUSH CHIPPER - Three ( 3 ) bids were received. VERMEER is not the lowest bid, but the highest bid. The other two ( 2 ) bids received did not meet the specifications as required. Our bid required a minimum engine size of 300 CID gas engine. Also, we requested a rotor cutter with a minimum diameter of twelve ( 120 inches and sixteen ( 16 ) inch width. The last re- quest , and the most important , was that the machine must have a feed stop gate. The other machines bid did not meet the engine size, had cutting disc, and not rotors , and did not have a safety gate. I feel the safety gate is a must when using this type of equipment . The gate or door falls down, preventing anything from entering the machine when it is tripped. Other machines have different safety features , but this seals off the cutting blades from the operator. I called the other two ( 2 ) bidders and asked about the machine, parts , and service on the machines they bid. One was located in Livermore, California and they were the lowest bidder. Any parts and/or service needed from them would have to be through California. Their bid did not meet the requirements we set . The other bid came from Phoenix. I called the company and asked to see their chipper. The person that submitted the bid told me they did not stock the chippers , and that when they sold one, they they ordered them. He also stated they had parts on hand to repair the machine. I , in turn had my Secretary call for the price and availability of a starter for the chipper. The reply she got was they didn ' t have the part in stock, that it would have to be ordered. With the above in mind, not meeting specifica- tions , equipment out-of-state, parts not readily available, lack of the required safety features , and the service a problem, I feel the higher priced machine is the lowest and best qualified according to our specifications . IV CRACK SEALANT - Three ( 3 ) bids were received. ROAD MAINTENACE SUPPLY was the lowest bidder by $ . 025 per pound or $1 , 000 . 00 total. They sold us our machine, maintenance parts , inventory and have delivered materials to us for over two ( 2 ) years . We have had no problem with their service or product . V SAND AND AGGREGATE - Four ( 4 ) bids were received. CASHWAY CONCRETE AND MATERIALS was recommended because of price and convenience. Cashway would save the City a considerable amount of money in haul bills due to the location of their pits . Using the total amount of material bid, there would be a difference of $41 , 777 .50 in materials hauled. Also, a difference of $1 , 817 . 50 is shown in the F.O.B. of their pit prices . This does not include the City' s cost of hauling. A round trip to Cashway' s pit takes 30-45 minutes at a price of approximately $. 20 per mile; the distance from the center of the City is 3 . 5 miles . The price for the ABC hauled by the City would now be $3 . 20 per ton. The same thing for the next lowest bidder would be sixty ( 60 ) minutes at a price of approximately $ . 20 per mile. The distance from the center of the City is 16 . 5 miles . The price for the materials hauled by the City would now be $6 . 20 per ton. The supplier is required to meet or exceed MAG Specs . VI PAVING MATERIALS - One ( 1 ) bid was received. UNION ROCK furnished the materials for the previous year. The service was above standard and no problems with the materials furnished. The price delivered or picked-up is as cheap as the quotes we get over the phone when required. Amok VII POWER SWEEPER - Three ( 3 ) bids were received. COPPERSTATE is being recommended because of the quality of their machine, service record, and availability of their parts . We have used the same type and brand of their product many times through rentals . We have had no problems with their rentals . The other two ( 2 ) bidders did not meet specifications. VIII CHIP SEAL - Two ( 2 ) bids were received. Both NESBITT CONTRACTING and Benson Contracting have performed services for the City of Apache Junction before. I recommend Nesbitt because of the bid price. The reason for the decision on going with the CRS-2 with 2% latex is the quality of the chip seal. This will give us a better street for a longer period of time. The oil will remain flexible longer. It has been tried and proven by both Pinal and Maricopa Counties . Am Ilk Attached you will find the complete bid prices received. (11.0tC HE✓G fi, 2 2 S 1` O ... U k� ^,�� � \ Z .. 3t "qRizoNPity a pacG�e Cunction FUEL SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 PW-86-5 Company Name and Address Amount Bid Mesa Fuel Co. P.O. Box 5347 Diesel $.470 per gal . Mesa, AZ 85201 Unleaded .8475 per gal . STREET STRIPING SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 PW-86-6 R & T Striping 15502 N. 38th St. Phoenix, AZ 4" Street Striping t.12 per lineal foot Safety Engineering 2845 S. 46th St. P.O. Box 21244 Phoenix, AZ 85036 4" Street Striping t.07per lineal foot Precision Striping 10065 E. Doubletree Scottsdale, AZ 4" Street Striping ¢.055 per lineal foot Swanston Equipment Company Traffic Marking & Striping Company 3404 W. Main Avenue Fargo, N. Dakota 58103 4" Street Striping t.12 per lineal foot lc t . ( ' &-Z i)k__ on V. Clark eputy City Clerk WITNESS: YA,/jkLA-At ) g2. kiiii7.,-„,„; boli,_,_,) Marjorye Keehnen Douglas Dobson Clerk eceptionist Operations Supervisor 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 PQACHF ✓, r U ��. p t;, �9 t Z "50.s 7..4 Y '141:' "I P/ZOO' ity o, . , i77GLche unclion BRUSH CHIPPER i. SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 PW-86-7 Company Name and Address Amount Bid Morbark California, Inc. 5940 N. Front Road Livermore, California 94550 $11 ,870.25 Vermeer Equipment of Arizona 3404 E. Washington Phoenix, AZ 85034 $15,995.00 Contractors Equipment Supply Co. $13,710.95 3570 Grand Ave, P.O. Box 14768 Alt. #1 $ 7,095.55 Phoenix, AZ 85063 Alt. #2 $12,697.30 �- ram, ( /'/ (,r'�%,$� ri V. Clark Deputy City Clerk — WITNESS• VY1.41.1t.,ip-te.:e.1 6 /611/4/J:I/L G-k:. 4--e—<--v--J Mariorx Keehnen Douglas obson Clerk Receptionist Operations Supervisor lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 p NCH6- ✓ ,, Gy U , l, -, Z 4 '1R NP �/ity o� '3 ache C unction IZO CRACK SEALANT SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 ^ PW-86-9 Company Name and Address Amount Bid Saguaro Petroleum & Asphalt Co. 731 N. 19th Ave, P.O. Box 6536 Phoenix, AZ 85005 40,000 lbs. $.227 per lb. Road Maintenance Supply P.O. Box 21349 Phoenix, AZ 85036 40,000 $.202 per lb. Brewer Cote of Arizona 5226 W. Missouri Avenue Glendale, AZ 85301 40,000 $.265 per lb. -71 ,,r J, , c C re, Dori V. Clark Deputy City Clerk WITNESS: `rn6a,i-Ltiu. -,2_,) V_,Q eakiti42.. ,„...)L.L...., Marjor e Keehnen Douglas obson Clerk Receptionist Operations Supervisor 1vc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 i<( ljiik,CHE-1 etgh ysV� ,, s O U j "ta +4 b s e 'i; ? ` '1RizoNP 'ity o, &4pac 4e unction SAND AND AGGREGATES .'► SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 PW-11-86 Company Name and Address Amount Bid Cashway Concrete and Materials 1A $3.90 2A $10.00 3A $3.65 per ton P.O. Box 1099 1B $2.50 2B $10.00 3B $2.20 per ton Apache Junction, AZ 85220 4A $42.00 per yard Johnson-Stewart-Johnson lA $5.90 2A $9.60 3A $5.70 per ton 1635 N. Alma School Rd. 1B $2.90 2B $6.60 3B $2.70 per ton Mesa, Arizona 85201 4A $41 .10 per yard Allied Concrete & Materials lA $9.05 2A $10.54 3A $8.20 per ton 2405 N. Center, P.O. Box 4166 1B $4.79 2B $6.39 3B $4.05 per ton Mesa, AZ 4A $49.91 Union Rock & Materials Corporation 1A $7.10 2A $11 .40 3A per ton 2800 S. Central Avenue 1B $2.75 2B $7.00 3B per ton Phoenix, Az 85066 4A $47.45 per yard HOT MIX PW-86-12 Union Rock & Materials Corporation 1 . $22.90 per ton (FOB) $17.95 per ton 'im' 2800 S. Central Avenue 2. $23.90 per ton (FOB) $18.90 per ton Phoenix, AZ 85066 3. $23.90 per ton (FOB) $18.95 per ton L ri V. Clark Deputy City Clerk WITNESS: /I 1.LAC.-1, 1? 6 el Li W' .4 .4) Awg.) Lk 11-)&) arlor;ie Keehnen Douglas Dobson Clerk Receptionist Operations Supervisor lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 icyp.C1-16. r�am,• ,- , G2 ej _ t i cA t• c . gRizoNP its a pace unction STREET SWEEPER SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 PW-86-13 Company Name and Address Amount Bid Contractors Equipment Supply Co. 3570 Grand Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85063 $19,408.73 Secco Industries, Inc. 4339 E. University Dr. Phoenix, AZ 85040 $34,677.50 Copper State Equipment, Inc. 2323 W. University Dr. $20,450.00 Tempe, AZ 85281 Alternate $19,850.00 n 7 L___//:/7 /, Lt Lpri V. Clark Dputy City Clerk WITNESS. 4 11/14.144"iciaj ci6 gellZ411,4 V' Q‘k, ( ct,...‘0,. .,,,-...) Marjorie Keehnen Douglas obson Clerk''Receptionist Operations Supervisor lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 PQACHE Nr11 kf,-{ yN,. °I' kv of pi 0 'IRiz. ` ity o, 4uce &unction -.aukCHIP SEALING SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 PW-86-14 Nesbitt Contracting Co. Bentson Contracting Company P.O. Box 1269 P.O. Box 8007 Mesa, AZ 85201 Phoenix, AZ 85066 1A $ 84,700.00 3A $ 77,000.00 1A $ 97,020.00 3A $ 92,400.00 1B 123,097.70 3B 111 ,907.00 1B 136,526.00 3B 129,812.00 1C 73,920.00 3C 69,300.00 1C 77,000.00 3C 70,840.00 1D 107,430.72 3D 100,716.30 1D 117,502.00 3D 110,788.00 2A $138,600.00 4A $150,150.00 2A $171 ,710.00 4A $178,640.00 2B 201 ,432.60 4B 210,432.60 2B 248,434.00 4B 258,505.00 2C 130,900.00 2C 152,460.00 2D 190,241 .90 2D 220,457.00 J 1 Z on V. Clark Deputy City Clerk WITNESS: Marjor,il e Keehnen Douglas obson Clerk Receptionist Operations Supervisor 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 .� i.. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES jofriii---6 \ . 0) it c4 _p I/1Y LI- \ ITEM # 3 e0u/s40 MEETING OF 4,1,e., MOTION BY: C/fillAtiiSECONDED BY : YV NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO U VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL I „Am. ' COUNCILMAN EIDSON v COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ i COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR I MAYOR HILL ' , UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 13 I MOVE THAT THE BIDS BE AWARDED AS FOLLOWS: ✓PW-86-5, FUEL, TO 4)W-86-7, BRUSH CHIPPER, TO P``W-86-9, CRACK SEALANT, TO •,{� �/frq ✓PW-86-11, SAND AND AGGREGATES, TO t '�6, v0W-86-13, STREET SWEEPER, TO f- 1, 44-86-14, CHIP SEALING, TO ` PeQj � n� z i<c PQACHE j�✓✓ 1 �P,ZoN� (-Oily o pace 09unctian MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER (I,L' FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 SUBJECT. EQUESTRIAN PARK ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS Staff has been working with the Bureau of Land Management Archaeologist over the past few months preparing detailed specifications for the Archae- ological investigations that are required according to our Recreation and Public Purpose Lease on the Apache Junction Equestrian Trail. With the recent adoption of the Five-Year Parks and Open Space Improvement Plan, this project has been prioritized to be completed this Fiscal Year. I feel confident that the new specifications will make our selection process much easier than our initial efforts a few months back. It is recommended that authorization be given to the Director of Community Services through the Acting City Manager to solicit Bids for the Apache Junction Equestrian Park Archaeological Investigations. Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. Agenda Approved by (- `'` i-V Date Item # Consent Agenda -- Public Hearing — Old Business -�-7" New Business Postponed Item — 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET (5) NOTES f: tOliL v 7( f \' '' 154- ITEM # I MEETING OF // b MOT I ON BY: liev3L7SECONDED BY: '1/1 ;;ES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ ✓ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL 17 UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL dok Imk ITEM NO. 14 I MOVE THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN TO THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES THROUGH THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION EQUESTRIAN PARK ARCHAELOGOCIAL INVESTIGATIONS. ,, p,CHF✓o U .,-s,„,M ,-0 Z ,s r g4izoNP Vitt' 4 Apache unction MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER r v FROM: ✓ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD Below is the list of students, proposed by the Apache Junction School District to serve on the City's Youth Advisory Board. 7th Grade Ilene LaBash Soren Saggio 8th Grade Susan Dobson Ross Greves 9th Grade Max Ragsdale Wendi Melcher 10th Grade Stephanie Carter Marie Pucsh llth Grade Becky Winkle Jason Hutchens 12th Grade Joy Smath Don Workman It is recommended that you appoint these individuals to the Youth Advisory Board. Your consideration of this request is appreciated 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 A'icip.cHt _ O v 1,1 )" Z • r gRIZONP ity pache 2unctian MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBERS THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGERt' FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD The Apache Junction School District is in the process of obtaining names of interested youth to serve on the City's Youth Advisory Board. As required by Ordinance, the School District will submit these names in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. The names of the youth were not available at the time of this writing, but will be available at the work session. Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business 0 z ,.�Y� � / Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 P?ACHE ✓ '9R/ZONP Vity o 04pache 09unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR , �o 71 .-;/c'1 U r567v BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 9/5 7,7 NAME: 2n0z2d �� /torte-SP/J»h TELEPHONE: J'.�7 - /- 1 '/FL2 (home) /� �- . 32 7) (office ADDRESS: / 1 3 , .0 ,,,,,,v �/, 5/.'4• ZIP CODE: frs"a ) OCCUPATION: (2iyirr-ssl?,y M,,,,. q,,r l6' �" / 7 -> � (if retired, please indicate fo mer occupation �Y or profession EDUCATION: 4/ 5(-ze,, r-ii'yJ_ PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. '' � -•— \ ,try Revised 6/19/81 Sip,nature of Applicant 1001 NC2TH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTICN,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SET NOTESL ' '''l kd ...... AY' 0 bc, ITEM # I MEETING OF c (t) MOTION BY: Iiii all SECONDED BY: a)671''4 Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL /I/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER I/ COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR V MAYOR HILL i UNAN 'IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Adak .r, ITEM NO. 15 I MOVE THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS BE APPOINTED TO THE YOUTH ADVISORY BOARD: COl 11(02/11/V-0 O� PeAC yn� HE✓G' ,,,.....„,"6 U N. P►,' zz 4 y f v \\\ Z ) /// 'Oil o '- 07racize unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 9, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO. HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER ilt/ FROM: V1 -v.�CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING PREPARED BY• \\ JIM NAKAGAWA, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 NEW BUSINESS ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION AND APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. SELECTION OF NEW BOARD OFFICERS. Attached is the letter of resignation from Sam Gardom, former chairman of the Board of Adjustment. Your Council is requested to appoint someone from the Talent Bank applications to fill that vacancy. At it s meeting of September 8, 1986, the Board of Adjustment elected Art Berry as its new chairman and Jean Perkins as its new vice-chairman. SUGGESTED MOTION "I move that we accept the letter of resignation from Sam Gardom of the Board , •. of Adjustment and that we appoint to fill that vacancy. " Agenda Approved by ..-1 Date Item # Ccnsent Agenda — Public Hearing Old Business //n New Business Postponed Item — 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 JIMMIN 4.1111. J I „me — ":.•; s c, . . - . , , MSS= ( ‘1010 ii 1 --• r .eirt -:-.-014.-• , 1 'i-1-4717771.1-La-v 4.4„,e. /?"-",-42-- rt-7,-P-7--•• .227 r --"-r-s.,-,11-z- 27:11 i 4 - 417-7-t-vc1 .-- ../. _ . 4...,.. .. „I...72," ......„...., ,, , t (zz Y-44- romp--47.7)-2 1, -,•301.,V-IV --,7 - ---)--- fraK re"AZ.- ' - --) ,-r-7-• 4-7-- ...z- ,---pLez i-i-r-r-r--,•-rn,-2)-zz_ , mliOr Ty77 fr-tic ...... ir...ce 4 1-..,. 17.4 __nriAt4 J 1 44.77 ,.,,._...77,.....,.. , ...„...„. ,..., 2C1' —/0-' 11110 li0 PQACHE✓G .. e _ 0 ,Ai, . 1 6 _,fivli' . - . 15 4_ f'" - jI 'tiR/ZONP �Dit� 4 04 ache , 9unctian TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR id42d el Alifus i=/!?e',vi s BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 3' /7 - �� NAME: ! Z.1/f-�-L E. / Cc/266 c5 TELEPHONE: 94 a- ' 0 (home) 9 _ cicia-7°f/Z (office; ADDRESS: 3V? S. c tj c r '�'/- A ZIP CODE: OS gDI7— 0 OCCUPATION: 3 t� Z717,4,7 e A (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: C:dd 7Cb ca-i— 9 cvf ) Je... ;pa," ile PRO FESSION AND/OR COM MUNITY ACTIVITIES: -0i /N‘!� � /n/e"/t d�if JCc ( � o4—Nccl — T i/CS e fI,,e I 7`I1&4#-i 07sde#rts C: �e ) ?e jc/ - //&&us 4 /Vie4v,PelL, I FEEL THAT I AM/QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON TH S BOARD/COMMISSIO /COMMITT ECAUSE AZ / n '/ ,ram Ake, t1 7 / 7 &/✓ ,f/', `/A 1t..y�� e C-�-fec„./74, 4,O .. Oit - a �/-/ 't1 z4 G`G/ c (�177",4L 7 // - C ( 74-itt d- ADDI IONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: �/y/C . el-'0 2-/E G"'n & c �Q_A 6 -i' cl NZ e/..1 4� C?r (r1 c ... ei f/ �I!�c-�: cec.i 5tc, i heC 1c /?7 PC his7Lrn NOTE: As a candidate to a Council �l Board, Commission or Committee, your name, �- address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. 7 If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement' is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. /0f} l3/ 4 4._:...f .t.:7__-.. S' at of licant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACH -J Jr19T1ON,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES o ,„ 4-LY 0, • c(JJ (1/, ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 41 " 61 SECONDED BY: Y NCB ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL I UNANITMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Aft. Amok 41116-, ITEM NO. 16 I MOVE THAT THE RESIGNATION OF SAM GARDOM FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET; AND THAT , BE APPOINTED BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Oak Irak (TIACHt ;. . .tip , ,�^• 41�1h>r� z gR�ZpNP ity 04pache 02unctian DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER / FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ti / SUBJECT: FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Agenda Item) The Flood Control District of Maricopa County is finalizing plans to construct the Apache Junction Flood Retarding Structure and Floodway at the northerly limits of the City. Previously Maricopa County approved the City's request to modify the embankment design so that the base for future roadway expansion would not require extensive reconstruction. More recently, the Flood Control District in finalizing their designs for the road ramps at the intersection of Idaho and Lost Dutchman roads, have determined that because of a differential of approximately 11 feet, access of Windsong Street to Idaho Road, and Apache Drive to Lost Dutchman Boulevard should be eliminated for safety purposes. Along these lines, the Flood Control District has acquired certain properties and proposes to dedicate rights of way and construct cul—de—sacs where Windsong Street and Apache Drive would terminate. In reference to the above mentioned, the District desires to obtain City approval for the closure of Windsong Street and Apache Drive, as well as approval for the construction of cul—de—sacs. Furthermore, the Flood Control District has advised that plans for the Apache Junction Floodway will impact Bulldog Mine Road. They have requested abandonment of this roadway to avoid constructing a bridge, and have indicated that traffic could retain access to S. R. 88 with the improvement of the Federally Patented Easements on Tomahawk Road. The District has been invited to elaborate on these requests during the Regular City Council meeting scheduled for September 16th. Agenda Approved by iv `�- RWB:sh Date item Consent Agenda -- Public Hearing _------- Old Business -- New Business File 100.051 Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Amik ITEM NO. 17 I MOVE THAT A PORTION OF THE FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT ON APACHE DRIVE, SOUTH OF LOST DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD, AND A PORTION OF THE FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT ON WINDSONG STREET, WEST OF IDAHO ROAD, BE EXTINGUISHED, PROVIDING THAT THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OF MARICOPA COUNTY PROVIDES LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PLOT PLANS OF THOSE AREAS OF FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT ABANDONMENT AND DEDICATIONS OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR CUL-DE-SAC IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO RECORDING IN PINAL COUNTY; AND THAT AS THE CITY DOES NOT RETAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR DEDICATED EASEMENTS FROM THE STATE LAND DEPARTMENT, NO OBJECTION IS EXPRESSED TO THE ABANDONMENT OF BULLDOG MINE ROAD AND THAT IN COOPERATION WITH THE PROPOSED FLOODWAY CONSTRUCTION, THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IS DIRECTED TO IMPROVE TOMAHAWK ROAD INITIALLY AS A DIRT ROADWAY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO STATE ROUTE 88. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ' tP0'. fLit: s / ITEM # , MEETING, OF I 0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: LitC NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON l0 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ / COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL PQAC HE. ✓o Off, r* . O O < ��: ,�r,w z gR/ZOWk c6ity o� C4acIie o` unction September 8, 1986 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGERW FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: PROPOSED PALM SPRINGS UNIT 6 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (Study Session Agenda Item) (Regular Council Meeting Agenda Item) Previously the City Council indicated an interest in creating an Improvement District in the vicinity of 17th and 18th Avenues between Tomahawk and Mariposa Roads, in order to improve the water systems as it relates to fire protection in order that industrial development could be attracted to this area. The City has coordinated with the Palm Springs utility in order to determine their interest in the improvement district concept and to develop alternative design scenarios. Attached are two preliminary alternative plans for the dis— trict limits, as well as preliminary cost estimates for Scheme "A" and "B". Should the City Council desire to proceed along these lines, the next step would be to determine interest in the creation of the district by contacting property owners. Should sufficient interest be obtained, then preliminary plans, estimates and other improvement district processes may be initiated. Normally, the interest in an improvement district is coordinated by interested property owners in the area to be effected. At this time, staff has not been given the names of contact persons in this regard. RWB:sh Agenda Approved by D ate Item # attach: Motions Consent Agenda Scheme "A" & "B" Cost Estimates Public Hearing Old Business --- �� 1 . New Business f' Postponed Item File 100.051 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 V PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE J U L 4 1986 OF CONSTRUCTING WATER MAINS AND FIRE HYDRANTS FOR PALM DEPARTMENT OF SPRINGS UNIT 6 IMPROVEMENT PUBLIC WORKS DISTRICT — WITHOUT FIRE HYDRANTS ALONG KACHINA AVENUE SCHEME "A" UNIT 4130,NTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT 2,550 1.f. 12" A.C. water pipe $17,50 $44,625 1 ,470 1.f. 8" A.C. water pipe 11 .50 16,905 3 ea. 12" x 6" tees 400 1,200 3 ea. 8" x 6" tees 260 780 6 ea. 6" 90 ells 130 780 6 ea. 6" V.B.&C. (complete) 340 2,040 5 ea. fire hydrants 850 4,250 20 1.f. 6" ductile iron pipe 17.00 340 4 ea. 6" tapping sleeveVRC 750 3,000 1 ea. 16" x 12" tapping sleeve VRC 2,100 2,100 2 ea. 12" V.B. C. (complete) 675 1 ,350 4 ea. 12" 45 ells M.J. 325 1 ,300 5 ea. 12" pipe adapters 110 550 200 1.f. 12" ductile iron pipe 25 5,000 1 ea. 12" x 8" tee 350 350 1 ea. 90 ell 200 200 2 ea. 8" V.B. C. (complete) 425 850 1 ea. 8" x 6" reducer M.J. 180 180 3 ea. 12" x 6" reducer M.J. 240 720 2 ea. Air release valves (complete) 300 600 1 ea. fire hydrant relocation 500 500 50 s.y. asphalt removal and replacement 22.00 1 ,100 200 a.f. concrete removal and replacement 9.50 1 ,900 200 l.f. concrete encasement 20.00 4,000 1 lot construction staking and inspection — 7,570 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF PROPOSED PROJECT $102,190 Ib o \- , PcrEivcD PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTING WATER MAINS JUL 2 4 1986 AND FIRE HYDRANTS FOR PALM DE A t'MEN T OF SPRINGS UNIT 6 IMPROVEMENT PUBLIC WORKS DISTRICT — WITH FIRE HYDRANTS ALONG KACHINA AVENUE AMft SCHEME "B" uu IITT QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION P�ICE AMOUNT 2,550 1.f. 12" A.C. Water pipe , $17.50 $44,625 1 ,470 l.f. 8" A.C. water pipe 11.50 16,905 6 ea. 12" x 6" Tees 400 2,400 3 es. 8" x 6" Tees 260 780 9 ea. 6" 90 Ells 130 1 ,170 9 ea. 6" V.B.&C. complete 340 3,060 8 ea. fire hydrants complete 850 6,800 20 1.f. 6" ductile iron pipe 17.00 340 4 88. 6" tapping sleeve VRC 750 3,000 1 ea. 16" x 12" tapping sleeve VRC 2,100 2,100 2 ea. 12" V.B.K. complete 675 1,350 4 ea. 12" 45 Ells M.J. 325 1,300 5 ea. 12" pipe adapters 110 550 200 1.f. 12" ductile iron pipe 25 5,000 1 ea. 12" x 8" tee 350 350 1 ea. 8" 90 Ell 200 200 2 ea. 8" V.B.00. complete 425 850 1 ea. 8" x 6" Reducer M.J. 180 180 3 ea. 12" x 6" Reducer M.J. 240 720 2 ea. Air release valves, complete 300 600 1 ea. fire hydrant relocation 500 500 50 s.y. Asphalt removal and replacement 22 1,100 Ai... 200 s.f. Concrete removal and replacement 9.50 1,900 200 l.f. Concrete encasement 20 4,000 1 lot Construction staking and inspection — 7,980 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF PROPOSED PROJECT $107,760 316 u - J9 COST BREAKDOWN FOR R E C E i''E D PALM SPRINGS UNIT 6 IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT J U L 2 4 1986 DEPAR TMM{Lt IT OF PUBLIC WORKS SCHEME "A" Total cost of project = $102,190.00 Number of lots 86 Total frontage = 4,300 feet Cost per lot = $102,190/86 = $1,188.25 Cost per frontage foot = $102,190/4,300 = $23.76 Cost per 50 foot lot = 50 x $23.76 $1,188.00 SCHEME "B" Total cost of project = $107,760.00 Number of lots = 108 Total frontage = 6,660 feet Cost per lot = $107,760/108 = $997.78 Cost per frontage foot = $107,760/6,660 = $16.18 Cost per 50 foot lot = 50 x $16.18 = $809.00 Cost per 100 foot lot = 100 x $16.18 = $1,618.00 SCHEME "8" ALTERNATIVE ONE (50% 12" Water Main to Kachina Ave.) The probable breakdown of the costs of the 8" and 12" water mains would be as follows. 12" water mains — 2,550 feet — 63% 8" water mains — 1.470 feet — 37% 4,020 12" water main costs = $107,760 x 63% _ $67,888.80 8" water main costs = $107,760 x 37% = $39,871 .20 Total cost for Kachina Avenue = $67,888.80 x 50% = $33.944.40 Total cost for 17th and 18th Ave = 12" mains = $33,944.40 8" mains = $39.871 .20 $73,815.60 Costs per lot Kachina Ave. = S33,944.40/22 = $1,542.93 17th & 18th Aves. = $73,815.60/86 = $858.32 Note cost based on a frontage foot would be the same for all intent and purposes SHEET ONE AM. #01IN RECEIVED JUL 4 1986 DE A:—;:N 1 OF SCHEME "8" ALTERNATIVE TWO (33% 12" Water Main cost to Kachina Ave. b U LC PORK$ Kachina Ave. $67,888.80 x 33% = $22,629.60 17th & 18th Aves. $67,888.80 x 62% = $45,259.20 8" water main $39,871.20 $85,130.40 eIN Cost per lot Kachina AVe. $22,629.60/22 = $1,028.62 17th & 18th Aves. $85,130.40/86 $989.89 SHEET TWO Si 6 , p ( -�2/ W..-1:-.a-cal.rit'r--;',"&- .-...-., -•_ ' - • - . -- 1.--• i i•:-71--...-'.' -1'.:' . ... _ ...!•:1-21!". .-,-*-,,,,r1-"Z:,...-. ., , _ I - '' .1 . • 1;,i P R EL I M I N A R Y PLAN ,FORACONST-R.00-_TIRai.WATER. t.zf..e.,.-i,. *MAINS AND FIRE HYDRANTS FORTH.EPROPOSED- PALM SPRINGS UNIT 6 IMPROVEMENT:DISTRICT ) .„ . - - t,,,,,.........,_ .... .-,..... , ---- s. -..r.--,- 7:- -., ,..#-,,.:. •--- ,-. :- SCHEMA r.„,,4,:l...t J.T. ""'1.-44; ::-•••••••.•- pettti-7„,,....it,7 ;, k-k, - - ., •4•• , ;-f.,A.14,1•.:',..t_:.f.f•t:. 4- .- .. _ '')' " - -- 7.4:,a1i1,-...;•:?..r-::. - , . • ._ i . * . .:;•...;.-4.71,t-,• •'--',,-.. ..•••- - . i...4.1.,-.41-7h.f,t•-, • • - , . . . - . 1 ,..„...,,*,?....,:: . 4 • _ ,,•,, ...,.; . .--.„..- .. . ..., 0 1. ,UNSUBDIVIDED, •.) ______ cr-s n `... i4 - et:, o '''••',11,ei ,- 1;., .- • I I LR t . .-, 4,47";4•ST.71,",;,F.47-,,...-4.5,.=;4..,..1r.ei'7V,A p4filf- ,. -.vt.)1:•...1:4'....i.--nengait ts, A -4.....m. . _ eih 5:kN.N, cC- PALM SPPIts GS UNIT 6 fc • , I ..1,3 -._.. __.0. te.v p 0-_.:,`,, 18TH AVr 14'1 - ' Ex4916i7 hI 'PALM SPRINGS MOBILE HOMES • 3 • ) ....° - 1.4::9::: --c , , • vs r-.....r•ri i r r% I, hiP2L-ALV 1 1 , 3 3 ...... , .,.:.z...........,,::„: —..„„,. •• ‘,..... ... _ . • .. . ,_..,..„.7.,..:.,:_.....:., ..t— , ,..:,,,,,;<-,".•--4.".".•••, i- -1,''''.j..,‘-,'-',..;;.--- -0--'7.-54.:Fs,.. • - .. •- ...,...-7--,-.-k%.,--,',--- - -;.--'A, :...••••••-•-;•-,„:..t.,'~-,1: ----- - - - - PRELIMINARY PLAWFOR,'CONSTRUCTING WATER .. • - . . ,......4.,:....,..> ) I , - , - .. • '-MAINS .AND FIRE_HYDRANTS FOR,-THE,:.,PROPOSED . -:. : • -4---,• -1.,..- - -.-, ....... 7 1 - .., PALM SPRINGS UNIT :.6- IMPROVEMENT:DISTRICT . , , ••....•........„.:,.-,.,,.. .... CHEMEV4B; ‘i. • . '''''. ! . '• '';',.44!.".-•-•.'";',' ,.•‘,4,-. ' 11:::,.f.,.--..,-C1. 11‘1,....":••_;:g -;I • ••• . : gli -..:1-•— i:7-"':•s::.-'-;:•,:i7:•'-7:-;,,t:.-.•„. • .. . --._-,..i .•i• . -; . • . . _ 1 , . . _ k ....,2.:,,..-:-.:-.ra:X.I.,•:".4 '..,..;-.,-4,-. . •• k^ ...,...e. . - - -4 " "'`..... ?',."."'-.. ' , A %).;,-,4"-',,.t"..-te-rsC .tP.,-3.,....:%, 4, ..j N N.,"'•"''.•:f4.'NC",'.'41'•-„,4 -,4".: -..-.' r37`471 „r..47.-4...,';',: itVc. ' ' - ---"•••• tk41.`—'7 .'''R'Pri....,. to:124,,,,14- - • , . - - , % ' "''''.-•........ - !...:.!--:;,,:e1".tc:,-''.',4--s'Ii.;;V..:A,..,- /..': , • • -.--, ,--,,,r,,-.i -• ,-.;;;;;',..-.t;;•.,',--..'t-"....,..nq . ;''. -....'.7.-.-i,4,-..7 •'. ...,-,....g.•...-.-„.,.:_-1--t--.z..--,.-.5..i.-r-.-, . . '. -, ?...7....h. ‘," - ' .............II;tti.,:•,'" :-i-1,..7.'iC ti.:.;:ut:. „...4.42..C.: ...1. -'-irft-1.r.'''..r...i‘r.00..,4,... -... 4 c'.,, .;.,it'.7..t, ._.., ; ,t-,.....c7,,:.,.....-- ."-'.41,11--..-4,1r."Tf.,%. . _ .:irt_;:76 -"'--- .:-;...''..:'• -,_it'.k.'--31:_r.i.",..;,••''",:4.., . .•'. -;;J';'.'4.1.: '..t.:-4.71kj''t--4::60- . ' r z • ....)- ‘e\----- . i•,---i"' - , L • .... ....:__.,...,,,,, , UNSUBDIVIDED ,:.,.4.:,,....„..„.„._,.., r Cl.•• ...,, , .,, In .."f.r.T.'6.--.:2z- ; .„ ,-7,, - :''''•, '",-..::".:-.W3f.g:t1";-.7i.Yr It 41a ) s'...:3F.'";tiCY,:i."...4.--;-: , . ":I c,'. '.1& t:KACHINA,A' E . I T •V /2, '.-...'. ,,..'.14V''''.:./.:-.:7,-‘ ... . X A\ \ illik , ... 1 . , .- . 's -- _ _ x ., . _. • 4 X , di /) O. . •PA_t4 5,Pi R.,ING_S,....._Urill ,e-, . x „ i • < 2 . •,,,......---- 0,--,- , , •::-.--:,, ,,,..4.-:y. .....-:.,'''. .4 • - ' , .. 1..:. - ' . .., ,-.. , .-' ..*,''.• '- ,1". Cl) • ii8THAii -k k . •.: ri ...75,„ . oc..f -., ,.,;F:i:,..„'..-.'....,..,_.-1-,:rii.:7•-",' .. "t.717.... x ''' k RVer..4dod • ' - '''' 4...-,---i-,....-r',-t-:-.'-;,..1.-:. . •,' '"::A."•,''.;t:".i-?...•*k f---,'...i Epiief 1 3, 1 f: ...:t...;" > "‘•'''...7.";i7:-.'4--..,... 1 • . .-.4.'"'tn,tit:::::*t-ct.4.4,.;, • ' ',- 4#,,,,..:4,....-.4... ,,,.. ,,,. ...: - --..•_. ,..10 :. . , -.6 .,.`f•-•..,,wr74.4.:•"'''..'""—-. ' - 7' ' , 4:: tl'etel ' PALM SPRINGS MOBILE,MORES -14-7. . •' •- , ..-".`,":•.;3...,..t.'4 ke...'......,...'........L......,...:2.1.../...., - " --.: ......;: 4.Z.,a-,,•*1.....'''.' ...,, . ,1 4,.....;:rt • ; -', Itt:''.:"" ..1 .w.. k '.......;474...1...4 i.• . • ,11.....‘.'\.'e.i.... • . , ..,..,.., • ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES a / iz t tif 007- ITEM # IgiC 1EETING OF e Igitt G MOT I ON BY / SECONDED BY Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL J COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ1-1/41 COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL V� MAN I"^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 18 Option A I MOVE THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE ACTING CITY MANAGER, UPON PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY A MAJORITY OF PROPERTY OWNERS, TO PROCEED ACCORDINGLY IN ORDER TO SUBMIT INFORMATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION OF CREATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IN PALM SPRINGS UNIT 6 AND OTHERAFFECTED AREAS. Option B I MOVE THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE ACTING CITY MANAGER, TO CONTACT PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE VICINITY OF PALM SPRINGS UNITE 6 AND gFFECTED AREAS TO DETERMINE INTEREST IN CREATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. a. p ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES iv v, _il tv ii ?piiiv r 0 j I,,,10/0/( (i, v (),L, tic. ITEf1 # MEETING OF i Soicr • MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: f YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON 11 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ 1 COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR J COUNCILMAN BALJOIvi/ MAYOR HILL UNANI/IGUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL �c PQACHF ,✓, ili.,Z2 ONP C6it # 4 o*lache 09unction September 8, 1986 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER �� 1 , FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, , SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES RELOCATION (Agenda Item) In conjunction with the development of the Library and City Complex Park site, the City Council has expressed desires to relocate the Public Works maintenance and animal control facilities. This office has been coordinating with the City Manager's office and the State Land Department in these regards and has recently received notification from the State Land Department that a parcel of land located south of Baseline Road and west of Royal Palm Road may be looked upon favorably with application to the State. With the City Council 's authorization, this office will perform other work as required in order to make appropriate surveys to more accurately locate the parcel and submit the application to the State. In conjunction with this year's budget, a preliminary site plan was prepared for a site considering long term development of the City and services to be provided. Essentially, it was proposed that 10 acres be initially acquired by lease, with option for an ultimate expansion to 20 acres. With Council approval, the application for a commercial lease with the State Land Department will be submitted. RWB:sh 17(,til t- :Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business -s Business ..,,�i' TV— New Postponed Item File 100.051 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Ink Adak Amok ITEM NO. 19 I MOVE THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO PERFORM NECESSARY WORK IN ORDER TO FILE A COMMERCIAL LEASE APPLICATION WITH THE STATE LAND DEPARTMENT FOR THE RELOCATION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITIES. O�` PQA�JG 2 (72n � U .Y Is -Tees z gR1zONP cOity o p ache unction � A..... September 15, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER ki FROM: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST SUBJECT: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM VACANCIES AND NOMINATIONS Periodically vacancies occur by resignation, transfer, attrition, etc. It is proposed at this time that the City Council act on any resignations or vacancies and make appointments as available and appropriate. Resignations or vacancies have occurred in the following categories of the Economic Opportunities Action Team: Financial Services: Al Villegas, Valley National Bank Dave Nicodemus, Merabank Letters of resignations received are attached. Nominees for appointment to available vacancies are: Financial Services: Bill Savory, United Bank of Arizona Dan Rodriquez, Valley National Bank Educators: Gary Nine, Apache Junction Unified School District Nominees have been invited to attend the City Council Workshop, September 15, or City Council Meeting, September 16, to be introduced. Talent bank applications are attached. c JMS:bsp Agenda Approved byate I/� �`I`F`�� D Item Attachments Consent Agenda — -— tr Public Hearing — Old Business 777. _.�_ New Business _ postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 VALLEY Valley National Bank of Arizona BANK HEADQUARTERS PHOENIX,ARIZONA AL VILLEGAS 48TH STREET E SOUTHERN MANAGER TEMPE,ARIZONA June 12, 1986 n r� co a' O C -n � D� s► 'l7 CCl rn_ = rnn v The Honorable Mayor Norman Hill G and Members of the City Council cs;► City of Apache Junctioncr o 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Due to my recent promotion and transfer to the 48th Street and Southern Office, it will not be possible for me to fully partic- ipate as a member of the Economic Opportunities Action Team. I hereby notify you of my resignation so that you may find a suitable replacement. Thank you for the honor of being appointed to the Economic Opportunities Action Team. Please extend my best wishes to the EOAT members in their ongoing efforts. Sincerely, Al Villegas Manager and Asst. Vice President 48th Street & Southern Office iWs" w - 'LC�� i o ri 41?1ZOW' citey o 4cic/ie c2ZLnction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Economic Opportunities Action Team BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: June 19, 1986 NAME: Bill Savory TELEPHONE: (home) 982-0600 (office) ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 2400, Apache Junction, Az. ZIP CODE: 85217-2400 OCCUPATION: Tinired Rank of Arizona - Regional Vice President (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: Northern Illinois University PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COKMUNITY ACTIVITIES. Director & treasurer of Apache Junction Area Community Foundation. ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES. Served as Vice President and Director of Gal.esburg Chamber of Commerce for six years. NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. ( If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. /40�lcAge r ?Cif Revised 6/19/81 Signature of Applicant 7 i' 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHE dei / 1 . '.�i�< g ay`}• 7 V •+ ice,-'.'!-. L g91zONP City o 71ac`Ze 2unction TALENT BANK APPLI CATI ON FOR Economic Opportunities Action Team BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: September 5, 1986 NAME: Dan Rodriquez TELEPHONE: 9'63-2-466 (home) <35'0/ Gv. � • 6-7—. J6- J��'8g (office; ADDRESS: C' /4,/l3G 42. ZIP CODE: /S22‘ OCCUPATION: 3 W / /til/. ✓t V A/42-i ,e4wg 4 Ne. jai o/--ic8- (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: /Z�xiV .4e/ZON4 /#.4i GOl41.'?efN/Ty ( A0064''_4I _rite,i71,/T� Dr /,C/A1 PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: 21/77245 G-A-4/11c ,5P15,./dtL ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES. NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends r your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. W51 1 f appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within ♦ ` ' the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. l 2 Revised 6/19/81 Signature of Applicai NOTE: Please return completed talent bank application to the attentio of JOHN M. SCHOEPH, Economic Development Department at the address shown below. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION ARRIZONA-115,240.• TELEPHONE(602)962-8002 ar... Iel A — 1111 ri gRVZ'OO' Vily o c1clde o9unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION ... FOR Economic Opportunities Action Team BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: 4/25/86 Nam: Gary Nine TELEPHONE: yS2 - 2 '7 (home) i 2_-WO K 0 3r (office: ADDRESS: 67 5 I.U. / 7 n° / ;JS ZIP CODE• C5-z-2 v /� i OCCUPATION: �vrL,,/v2- �T�s;t' ',,, ,e i'i�,,/, ' (if retired, please -indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: ii7 ,4• /;� (563c_, (/- PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMUNITY ACTIVITIES: !"/435 j �C - d� 1anc,c.,)' y G .�. 4:7J 7/yr✓ 6 7✓--z c,ei7 ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES. A/C2-, 7,7 NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission -or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. aiiir. 6 f appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within yiCR the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from 1' the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. c._..... ,,-) ._/7 . Revised 6/19/81 Signature of/Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r /1\P 1 _ 1 C ITEM #_2v\ MEETING 0 11) MOT I ON BY. N 0,A A SECONDED BY. Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL \ la r ITEM NO. 20 I MOVE THAT THE RESIGNATIONS OF AL VILLEGAS AND DAVE NICODEMUS FROM THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET; AND THATS4A.Aig1.1 ()1 , AND ' GULL _ BE APPOINTED IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES CATEGOR , AND BE APPOINTED IN THE EDUCATORS CATEGORY. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING�" . OF q16 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: ~ )ES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER C T' P► E QI€t-JLi COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL V UNAN 10US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ,^, ILTTTOILI ITEM NO. 21 I MOVE THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M., AND AS WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. , ON OCTOBER 6, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M., ON OCTOBER 7, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. A al //111114 Aa MAGISTRATE COURT OF APACHE JUNCTION COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORT August, 1986 FINANCIAL STATEMENT. Civil Traffic, Criminal Traffic and Criminal Citations INCOME: Fines $21,913.37 Bonds 1,200.00 proffessional Service 955.00 Misc. 4,353.00 $28,421.37 EXPENSES: Combined State taxes $5,646.29 Bonds refunded 193.45 Jury fee 00.00 Fines refunded 00.00 Proffessional Service 2,232.00 Misc: 100.00 8,171.74 Net Receipts $20,249.63 FINE PAYMENTS OWED: FINED ASSESSED ATTY FEE ASSESSED TOTAL Fine Payments $267,553.65 $8,393.00 $275,946.65 Warrant outstanding 114,189.95 5,920.00 120,109.95 GRAND TOTAL $381,743.60 $14,313.00 $396,056.60 FINES PAID OFF BY WORKING FOR CITY: 7 people = $675.62 t MAGISTRATE COURT' OF APACHE JUNCTION COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORT August , 1986 CIVIL TRAFFIC Pending Citations forward 161 Monthly citations issued 205 TOTAL 366 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid , 173 Default Judgment 56 Adjudged Not Responsible 0 229 TOTAL PENDING 137 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC Pending Citations forward 724 Monthly citations issued 95 TOTAL 819 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid 66 Dismissed ( court ) ( prosecutor ) 11 Suspended sentence or probation 4 Time served 0 81 TOTAL PENDING 738 CRIMINAL Pending Citations forward 569 Monthly citations issued 53 TOTAL 622 FINALIZED DISPOSTIONS Fines paid 40 Dismissed ( court ) ( Prosecutor ) 6 Suspended sentence or probation 5 Time served 3 54 TOTAL PENDING 568 WAR RANT S Pending forward 779 Issued 71 TOTAL 850 Warrants cleared 51 TOTAL PENDING 799 PQ ikCHE✓G p tips qR/zONP O2ty at pace 09unctian September 5, 1986 TO: Acting City Manager THRU: Director of Public Works , `'__// 0_ROM: Building Official/Zoning Administrator RE: Building Permit Activity (August 1986) Attached please find a copy of the Building Permit Activity Report for the month of August 1986. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY AUGUST 1986 • r NUMBER OF r VALUE OF LIVING COMMERCIAL ' _ NUMBER OF TYPE PERMITS .ONSTRUCTION UNITS UNITS INSPECTION ANGLE fJ 1LY DWELLINGS 4' ( 5) 310,266 4 ( 5) 395 ell4f3) )UPI EX ,- - ( -) -. ( -) .1 ( 16) IR]PLEX - ( -) - ( -) - ( - ) OURPLEX - ( -) - ( -) 29 ( 81) .PAR1ilLN15 — ( 4) - (32) - (248) 40R]LE HOMES 32 (24) 712,732 32 (24) 233 (359) koDN. (R) 4 ( 2) 31,039 - ( -) 23 ( 43) WON. (C) 5 ( 3) 36,908 - ( -) 2 ( 17) 2E5 C/P I. GARAGES 4 ( 3) 133,397 - ( -) 6 ( 14) lI EKES - ( -) - ( -) 1 ( 4) ?EIAIL SIORE - ( 3) - ( -) 37 ( - ) II HER C0'PlERCIAL 2 ( -) 442,142 - ( -) 19 ( 36) 'WN]NGS 7 ( 3) 10,524 - ( -) 6 ( 42) 3OOLS 3 ( -) 32,618 - ( -) 3 ( 14) ,IGNs 3 ( 2) 5,900 - ( -) ' 3 ( 10) ,HERS 2 ( -) 14,795 - ( -) 1 ( 7) 11HER 9 (13) 5,275 - ( -) 55 37) lTHER SHELTER - ( -) - ( -) - - ) 'THER INSPECTIONS 36 ( 43) oTAI 75- -(62) 1,735 5-9b 3b -...(61, _ - — — 850 (1,294) (1,809,732.) _- -_ _--'--- ._-._,_ 01D - ( -) IIHDRAWN - ( -) ' ENrNAL - ( 2) G( +U 1OTAL 75 (64) KCY: ( ) = THIS MONTH LAST YEAR 1 1 .•. s r— Amok redACHE✓G 20 .� I _,r-•,.0 U �,� 0.- I k& z RIZON COity oli C pache 2unct2on DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 10, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH KATHLEEN CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER 0'1 FROM: 'CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT Ur PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION p Attached please find copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of August 26, 1986. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's office CRN.J1 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602) 982 8002 �s PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AUGUST 26, 1986 7 P.M. WORK SESSION ON AGENDA ITEMS AT 6 30 P M. PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS Ms Callahan List in Plar^ Mrs. Conway Office Mrs Davies Mr Jorgensen Mr. Vanhoy Mr. Vehon, Chairman Mr Nakagawa, Staff Mrs. Reid, Staff Mr. Newcomer, Executive Secretary Ms. Ortberg, Recording Secretary SYNOPSIS Agenda dated August 26, 1986 approved as submitted Minutes dated August 12, 1986 approved as submitted PZ-29-86 continued to Sept 9, 1986 Applicant later arrived and this case was heard. Commission recommended approval PZ-34-86 recommended for approval SUP-4-86 recommended for denial PC-SUP-28-86 recommended for approval PC-PZ-11-86 (PC-SUP-26-86) recommended for approval 1. Roll Call All members present as noted above. 2 Conway/Taylor M/S "I recommend that the Agenda dated August 26, 1986 be approved as submitted " Motion passed 7-0-0. 3 Davies/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Minutes be approved as printed." Motion passed 5-0-2 with Mr Taylor and Mr Jorgensen voting present 4. Chairman opened PZ-29-86 and asked for staff briefing /1 5 Mrs Reid briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District 6. Chairman asked the applicant to speak. There being no applicant or representative present and no public wishing to speak regarding this case, he asked for a motion from the Commission 7. Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "I move that our Commission continue this case to our next meeting of September 9, 1986 at 7 p.m. in these Chambers I appreciate the fact that it's been continued once before but it looks to me like something serious has come up and this will eliminate the need for another fee." Motion passed 7-0-0. 8. Chairman opened to the public PZ-34-86 and asked for staff briefing. 9 Mr Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding this request to rezone from CB-1 Local Business Zone to C-2 Local Commercial District. 10 Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 11 Keith Stachar responded, stated his request and answered questions Ask P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE TWO 12. Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for staff's recommendations. 13. Mr. Newcomer stated that this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site If approved, staff would recommend the stipulation of the dedication of rights- of-way. 14 Mr Stachar stated that the rights-of-way spoken of had already been taken care of Amok 15 Chairman closed this hearing to the public 16. Conway/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-34-86, an application of Keith and Kathryn Stachar and R.E. and Lillian Christensen for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CB-1 Local Business Zone to C-2 Local Commercial District The reasons for this recommendation are 1 It complies with the General Plan 2. It will be an asset to the neighborhood. Motion passed 6-1-0 with Mrs. Davies dissenting Mrs. Davies commented that "the message to the Council is that this is the third recent request for rezoning after construction has been started and I think that's a practice that should not continue " 17 Chairman opened to the public SUP-4-86 and asked for staff briefing 18. Mr. Nakagawa briefed the Commission and showed a videotape of the subject site regarding this Special Use Permit to allow for on-site signs higher, larger, and/or greater in number than existing zoning allows. 19 Commission had numerous questions of staff regarding the legalities of this case. imink 20 Mr Coleman clarified for the Commission some questions they had raised regarding the Sign Ordinance and its intent He also wanted to clarify that the Commission needs to be careful to find special conditions that would allow any type of a trade-off, and understand exactly what they are approving. 21 Chairman asked the applicant to speak. 22. Jeff Keehne responded and stated that they need more visible signs for the Grand Center to give them more exposure. Feels that the owner, Art Grandlich, who has spent millions of dollars upgrading this property will not further expand the property unless he's able to put up the signs he desires He spoke of the revenue the Grand Center brings to the community They need bigger signs to upgrade the property and to be able to plan future expan- sion 23. Mr. Taylor Told the applicant that in order to make a tradeoff he must be willing to give up something. The square footage they are taking down is allowed by the Ordinance He would like to see a reduction in height /'a P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE THREE Stated that the way it stands, the Commission has a problem with it and there needs to be a compromise The Commission cannot allow this without a positive tradeoff, otherwise they would leave themselves wide open to destroy the work involved and the strong feelings of the citizens who participated in forming the Sign Ordinance 24. Mr Keehne responded that they are running out of time. He then asked the Commission what they would allow them to pubes in 25 Mr Taylor New signs would look better, but we need a reduction on the 40 foot height so that there is a positive tradeoff and we'd actually be getting something in order to hold off any future case. 26. Mr. Jorgensen questioned staff about being able to change signs without bringing them into conformance. 27. Mr. Newcomer stated that maintenance, changing of interchangeable panels, etc. can be done but not changing names or the entire face of the sign without coming into conformance. 28. Mr. Taylor feels that new signs would be better, so if they would give us a reduction in height, we would be getting some- thing. 29. Mrs. Conway why can't they get a conforming sign with the word "Travelodge" on it 30. Mr. Keehne feels the visibility would be a problem. Doesn't feel eight foot signs would cover the 14 acre property. Also, the cost involved would be prohibitive. 31. Mrs Davies stated her tradeoff suggestion is to put conforming signs at each drive-in entrance. If willing to do that, then her suggestion to the Commission would be to allow them to put in the word "Travelodge" on the tall sign However, the rest of the signs must be conforming. 32. Mr Keehne feels that the shorter signs would not be seen from the Highway, and people would not see where the entrance is and pass by them 'oak, 33 Mrs. Conway asked if the majority of their business was due to re - tions or to drop-ins. 34. Mr. Keehne feels that being affiliated with "Travelodge" would increase their business 10% by reservations Presently, 75% of the people are "drop-ins" from Highway traffic 35. Mr. Taylor doesn't feel they'll knock their signs down if we reject them, so why not possibly make a deal to get new signs and get a height reduction They must give up something that is non-conforming for us to allow this. 36. Mr. Keehne feels that all the signs are non-conforming because they're all more than eight feet tall. They'll reduce the number of signs 37. Mr. Taylor stated they need a height reduction 38 Mr Keehne asked if they took off the word "Grand" which would be a height reduction 39. Mr. Taylor felt that would be fine with him. That would knock off five or six feet. Auk P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES . AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE FOUR 40. Mr. Vehon feels that it would be a reasonable compromise to bring the 25 foot sign facing the east, down to eight feet and try to work something out with Mr. Jordan regarding his palm tree that might block the travelers from seeing the conforming sign. 41 Mr. Keehne feels there would still be a problem because of the way the property is situated around a curve of the Highway Ask 42. Mr Vehon understands the uniqueness of this situation due to the fact that they are dealing with existing buildings which cannot be moved around. Feels they should compromise by taking down the existing entrance signs and replace them with nicer, conforming eight foot signs to give the Travelodge name and symbol there as a trade-off by bringing those down to allow for the name change on the larger sign. 43. Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition he asked for staff's recommendations 44. Mr. Nakagawa stated the directions the Commisson may take, and the stipulations suggested by staff if approval was in order. 45 Chairman asked applicant if he wanted to comment on possible compromises or stick with what has been submitted 46 Mr. Keehne responded that he wants to stick with what has been submitted. 47 Chairman closed this hearing to the public 48. Mrs. Conway asked him if he would want a continuance or a denial t 49 Mr Keehne stated he wanted a decision tonight with reasons for /! the denial so it could be brought up again 50. Mrs Davies stated that with a continuance they would give him the reasons without another fee. 51. Mr. Keehne because of the time element he didn't want to start over again, so he'd like the continuance for another two weeks. Am\ 52. Mr Vehon wanted him to be aware that even with the continuance there's no way of knowing what the outcome would be 53. Mr. Taylor feels that a good percentage of the Commission would be favorable to the deal if there was a reduction in height. He still feels that a lot of the signs coming down are conforming, which would not be enough of a reason to over-rule the Sign Ordinance. If he were to take the top sign off which is five feet, that would be a good compromise. 54. Mrs. Conway asked to hear again from the Building Inspector 55 Mr Coleman he's not so concerned about the outcome but wants the Commission to be aware of the technical problems associated with their decision His personal feelings would be to continue the case so there can be conversations between applicant and staff He believed the Commission feels there are grounds for compromise, but it needs to be laid out in a better fashion P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE FIVE 56. Mr. Vehon reminded Commissioners that this case can be voted on tonight as well, rather than have a continuance 57. Chairman closed this hearing to the public. 58 Mrs. Conway asked the applicant if he would be willing to continue this case to September 23, rather than the September 9th meeting. �\ 59. Mr. Keehne stated he was not willing. 60. Mr Jorgensen stated that since this is the first test of the Sign Ordinance, he feels that if they compromise the Ordinance at this point, there'd be a lot of work down the drain by the citizen's committee and the Commission 61. Mr. Taylor stated that if we deny this they'll leave the signage like it is, and the City would not gain anything, but if we'd work with them to get a reduction and newer signs, the whole community would be better off. He doesn't feel that's a compromise of the Sign Ordinance since the City would be getting something better than what we've got. 62. Mr. Jorgensen stated that the Commission dealt with that threat when they were trying to talk to the sign companies, and came to the conclusion that the sign companies weren't willing to give anything. One said that they would never take any of their signs down but leave everything up that was nonconforming. Feels that in this situation there's no compromise offered. 63 Mr. Vehon stated that this is a tough testing point for this 111 Ordinance These types of things to allow this are put in an Ordinance for a reason in case something comes up that one cannot conform with the Ordinance He feels that there's enough involved in this case to at least look into that because of the unique location of this site. There is no other arrangement like this in town Feels that they should look at it and make some type of compromise with them to allow signage that would do them some good and do their business some good. This Commission or the City is not here to run people out of town, we're here to work with people the best we can, plus protect the public interest He also agrees that a different plan from anything seen this evening would be in order. 64 Mr. Taylor feels that if they were a new business coming in it would be different than an already existing business. 65. Conway/Jorgensen M/S "I move that Conditional Use Permit application SUP-4-86 be denied The reasons for this recommendation are. 1 We would be setting a precedent and could cause a legal problem in the future If we ever had this kind of a thing come up again and we approve it or deny it we can be considered prejudiced. 2 The people in the community were very specific about these signs and if we let them down we're letting the whole Ordinance down elmwt'A' r oink P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE SIX 66 Mr Taylor stated that he didn't feel they would be letting anybody down by working with somebody, and by improving the signs already there. Feels there should be compromise with the people. 67. Mrs. Conway stated that she felt compromise was offered by continuing this case to September 23, and the applicant was unwilling Amok to do so, and so they would get a decision tonight Ir Motion passed 5-2-0 with Mr. Taylor and Mr. Vehon dis- senting. 68. Chairman Announced a 10 minute recess. Reconvened at 8 30 p m Stated that the applicant for PZ-29-86 had arrived late due to a mix-up in the date that this case was to be heard This case was heard first on the agenda tonight and was continued. He therefore needed a motion from Mr. Taylor or Mr Jorgensen to reopen this case since they made the motion to continue. 69. Taylor/Jorgensen M/S "I move that the Commission reopen PZ-29-86 to be considered at this time " Motion passed 7-0-0. 70 Chairman reopened PZ-29-86 to the public, and since staff had briefed the Commission, he asked the applicant to speak 71 Dan Rafferty responded, stated his request, and answered questions of the Commission Said that the applicant needs a larger space for his tool business and is considering building on the subject site 72. Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition, he asked for staff's recommendations. 73. Mrs. Reid stated that staff recommended approval of the rezoning ik request, stipulating site plan approval prior to commence- ment of construction and also dedication of rights-of-way 74. Davies/Vanhoy M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case PZ-29-86, an application of Jerome and Mary Imperial for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to C-3 General Commercial District. Any stipulations or recommendations are 1. Applicant dedicate the North thirty-three feet (33') of the subject property for public roadway and associated purposes along with twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoffs at the inter- sections of U 5 60 and East 20th Avenue unless East 20th Avenue is found to be abandoned. 2 Site plan approval prior to commencement of construc- tion from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council until such time as a Site Plan Review Ordinance is in place The reasons for this recommendation are 1 This is otherwise compatible with the zoning of property along U S 60 2 It is an acceptable use of the property. s bk Ain P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE SEVEN Motion passed 7-0-0. 75 Chairman Under Request from Other Agencies, he opened PC-SUP-28-86 to the public and asked for staff briefing 76. Mr Nakagawa briefed the Commission regarding this referral from Pinal County for a Special Use Permit to allow an unenclosed modular office manufacturing plant He also showed a video of the subject site. IT 77. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 78 Frank Talbott stated he is the representative and answered questions 79. Ed Sheckard stated he is the applicant He gave background of himself and how this project came into being and why they chose this area. 80. Commission much discussion among themselves and also the applicant about the plans for the future, off-site improvements, having an unenclosed building and screening of the property 81. Chairman asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in favor of this request 82. John Schoeph stated that they would be employing 15-20 persons initially and getting up to 80-100 in a year's time. That would mean a payroll ranging from $200,000 to past $1 million Also feels that it is good that they put their monies initially into production rather than a building, since production will generate the revenues to pay for everything else 83. Chairman asked Mr Schoeph if he has done any type of background check on Mr Sheckard's company to insure that he has a good reputation and that the City should take a risk on this type of individual 84 Mr. Schoeph stated that to a limited extent, mostly through the financial avenues 85 Mr Sheckard stated that he has three current licenses under the Office of Manufactured Housing which are very difficult to get. They do FBI and extensive background checks. 86 Chairman closed this case to the public. 87 Jorgensen/Conway M/S "I move that the Commission recommend to the Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission the approval of PC-SUP-28-86, an application of Edward Sheckard of Kendle- wood Manufacturing for his property described as, a matter of public record, requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a modular office unenclosed manufacturing plant Any stipulations or recommendations are 1. This is a one year permit to be reviewed at the end of that time. 2. That the appropriate agreements be drawn up for scheduling of any improvements if Pinal County is going to postpone off-site improvements to Cactus and Baseline 3. That in the future this entire site be visually screened and that this be reviewed every year to be sure it's being done Irernr Ask Aft. P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE EIGHT The reasons for this recommendation are: 1 It has the support of the Economic Development Department and the Development Coordinating Committee 2 It looks like it's going to be a good thing for the Apache Junction area." I►. Mrs. Conway added stipulation number three. Motion passed 7-0-0 88. Chairman opened PC-PZ-11-86 (PC-SUP-26-86) to the public and asked for staff briefing. 89. Mr. Newcomer briefed the Commission regarding this referral from Pinal County for a Special Use Permit to operate a real estate office from her home. 90. Chairman asked the applicant to speak 91. Ione Chovanec responded, stated her request and answered questions of the Commission. 92 Chairman there being no one wishing to speak in favor or opposition, and staff having no further comments he closed this hearing to the public. 93 Taylor/Vanhoy M/S "In regard to the Special Use Permit to operate a real estate office from her home, a Pinal County referral, the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mends the approval to the Pinal County Commission. Any stipulations or recommendations are 1 the number of employees is limited to one non-resident 2. Restricting the floor area to be devoted to the business 3 Providing that there are extra parking spaces Amok 4. Limiting signage to one small, non-illuminating sign attached to the building Size should be limited to the minimum size and information required by the Department of Real Estate 5. Review of the permit if any complaints are lodged by the neighbors concerning noise, appearance, traffic, parking or other disturbance to the neighbor- hood The reasons for this recommendation are• 1 This is an individual trying to make a living, operating out of her home, and if it was in the City of Apache Junction on that particular type of property it would fall under our home occupaction and probably would be favorably looked at " Motion passed 5-2-0 with Mrs Conway and Mr Jorgensen dissenting 94. Mr. Newcomer under Information and Reports, he mentioned the APA Conference and stated that any Commissioners wishing to attend should let staff know in order to make reserva- tions. s P & Z COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE NINE Also announced that August 27, 1986 a meeting would be held with the property owners in the recently annexed portion of Section 33 to discuss their desires regarding City zoning districts. 95. Mr. Nakagawa spoke about the technical report #3 on the General Plan that he had distributed to each Commissioner and brought to their attention the upcoming meetings to be held on September 3, which will be a joint work session wit mk the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Also, the first public hearing to be held before the Commission will be on September 23, 1986. 96 Mr Jorgensen under Commission Requests to Staff, he stated his concern about the notification of surrounding property owners of in the Pinal County referral cases. He felt that they should be aware that the Apache Junction P & Z would be giving a referral to Pinal County, and they may wish to speak at these meetings. 97. Mr Newcomer Said he would speak with Mr Hogue and suggest that they add a line in their letters to the 300 foot property owners to contact the City Planning Department for date of referral hearing. 98 Vanhoy/Jorgensen M/S to adjourn Meeting adjourned at 10.20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, a�ries Newcomer, Executive Secretary Tony Ve on, airman /011\ r— ip,CHE Pe do i,c, U , .;'C'►. Yy• z IRIZpNP..„„) V ity o . 04pache cOunction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 9, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER W FROM , CHARLES R NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION 01.114, Attached please find copies of the Board of Adjustment Minutes from their meeting of April 21, 1986. Please have the original Minutes placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk's Office. CRN jl 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602) 982-8002 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA APRIL 21, 1986 7:00 PM PRESENT ABSENT GUESTS Mr. Berry Mr. Schaffer List in Mr Carter Planning Mr Setliff Office Mr. Burgess Mrs Blatterspiel Mr Gardom, Chairman Mr. Newcomer, Executive Secretary Mr. Nakagawa, Staff Mr Class-Erickson, Staff Ms. Ortberg, Recording Secretary SYNOPSIS Agenda dated April 21, 1986 approved as submitted Minutes dated February 10, 1986, approved as submitted BA-1-86 recommended for denial 1. Roll Call Six members present with one absent as noted above. 2 Blatterspiel/Carter M/S "I make a motion that we approve the Agenda dated April 21, 1986." Motion passed 6-0-0 3 Carter/Setliff M/S "I make a motion to approved the Minutes as published of February 10, 1986 " Motion passed 5-0-1 with Mr. Burgess abstaining [E` 4 Chairman Opened BA-1-86 to the public and asked for staff to brief the Board. 5 Mr. Class-Erickson showed a video of the subject site and gave the background regarding this case. Included in the background information he indicated staff had discussed with the applicant alternatives for resolving this situation; those alterna- tives being readjustment of the lot line in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance, or the applicant moving the mobile home to meet the ordinance requirements. He also stated the staff's recommendations Recomr,aodations were that the Board of Adjustment determine it lacks authority in this matter as per Section 9-462.06 (Il)(2) of the Arizona Revised Statute; or, the Board deny the variance on the grounds that the hardship is self-imposed, or, that non-conformity of the south side yard setback could be resolved by adjusting the lot line or by moving the mobile home 6. Board discussed questions among themselves and with the staff 7 Eugene McAtee stated that if he had known there could have been a problem, he could have put down a twenty foot setback instead of a four and a half foot setback and no one would have been able to check it very easily He also feels that, when the previous owner applied for the building permit for the carport, he should have been informed by the City at that time of the problems Also, when he had to cut it off at the property line, the City should have looked at it and informed him then. rs BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES APRIL 21, 1986 PAGE TWO 8. Bill Beaulieu Stated he was the listing realtor who sold this property to Mr McAtee Gave a background of how he sold this property and the relationship with Sandy Whitten He also presented documentation of the original contract to the Board Stated that the previous owner (Mr. Mueller) contacted him and stated he and his wife could no longer live there Mr Beaulieu felt that this property would be difficult to sell because of several washes crossing through it. After some time the property wasn't selling He went out and measured and he knew exactly where the trailer set and how it was set He then told Mr. Lake that the trailer was too close to the property line and he didn't see how he could divide the lot nor sell the property for the price Mr Mueller wanted. He spoke to Mr Mueller and stated he should split the land and sell l acre with the trailer on it for a lesser price and sell the other two portions for a lesser price The seller agreed. Mr Beaulieu then said he had to find out about the position of the trailer to the property line because he knew it was three to four feet from the property line and he didn't know if it could be cut off there To do this he went to Sandy Whitten and told her about the carport that extended over 12 - 14 feet and it extended over where he considered the lot line to divide out the property He wanted to be sure he could sell the 1$ acre with the trailer on it He told Sandy Whitten that he wanted to tear the carport out. She responded that if that was done, the trailer would have to be moved back 20 feet Since the carport is part of the structure and is attached, if it is left on the line or if it's extended over the line the trailer can stay there. Mr. Beaulieu stated that this is his recollection of the conversation as best as he could recall He decided to cut the carport right over the line so it encroached on the other line and would not have to move the trailer. Stated that "this is exactly what I remember" He now drew up the listing contracts with the seller and he could now sell them as pieces It was understood by both seller and buyer that this carport would be cut on the property line On April 1st he was advised by Mr Lake who said "You'd better get a letter confirming what you've said " He stated he didn't get one confirming enough, knowing that now, but having no reason to at the time He felt he was assured that by cutting the carport on the line he wouldn't have to move the trailer. He knew the trailer was only four feet (4') away and Mr Lake, who's been in business for 25 years, knew it as well. Mr McAtee was not involved in any of these discussions at this time, in fact he didn't even know about the property at this time When Mr. McAtee purchased the property Mr. Beaulieu went to Sandy for confirmation and stated that he felt what he had done was appropriate Land Mr Lake had concurred 9. Mrs Blatterspiel asked if he created these property lines to the south, knowing the trailer was too close to the property line 10 Mr Beaulieu after speaking with Sandy Whitten, he advised Mr Mueller that the lot could be subdivided and cut out in that direction. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES APRIL 21, 1986 PAGE THREE 11 Mrs Blatterspiel stated "in other words, you knew in establishing the new property line that the buildings were going to be too close to the property line" 12 Mr. Beaulieu stated that yes he did know that That's why he came to the City He was told then it could be cut in this way by the City and so he did so to conform with the City. 13. Chairman stated that that doesn't in any way conform with the City Planning and Zoning. 14. Mrs Blatterspiel Asked if there wasn't any way he could have regulated the subdivision line so that he'd come far enough away at the building site In other words, like an irregular shaped lot 15 Mr Beaulieu stated "I could have at that time but there was no need to do it. I was told that this was all right the way it was " 16 Mr Perrault Asked that this request be granted. 17. Board discussion among themselves 18 Ms Whitten In reference to a conversation with Mr Beaulieu and the letter of April 1, 1985 submitted to him, she clarified that Section 6.0118 only refers to detached accessory buildings, not attached. Stated that discussion with Mr. Beaulieu was in regard to a detached accessory building, not a carport which is attached to a main building. It was not a detached accessory building that was being considered and discussed Different types of accessory buildings require different setbacks. 19. Carter/Berry M/S "I make a motion that these good people work out their own problems and bring it back in 60 to 90 days." 20. Mr. Burgess Stated he did not believe this would resolve anything, and that this would be delaying the problem He then asked the applicants if they wanted a 60 day extension or if they want it settled tonight. 21 Mr & Mrs McAtee stated they wanted it settled here tonight 22 Board after discussion this motion was withdrawn. 23. Board discussed among themselves whether or not they had authority to act in this matter 24. Mr. Berry stated that the decision has to be based on the rules and regulations and not by feelings 25. Chairman asked for a restatement of staff's recommendations. 26 Mr Newcomer responded and restated the above described recommendations (listed in item #5) 27. Mrs. Blatterspiel Made the following motion "I feel we have to disapprove this because the Board of Adjustment lacks the authority in this matter " 28. Mr Carter I feel we have the authority and I would amend that motion to finding number three which states that Non-conformity of the south side yard setback could be resolved by adjusting the lot line or by moving the mobile home The above motion was withdrawn and the following motion was voted on and adopted BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES APRIL 21, 1986 PAGE FOUR 29 Carter/Blatterspiel M/S "I make a motion that this case be denied." The finding for denial is 1. Non-conformity of the south side yard setback could be resolved by adjusting the lot line or by moving Am the mobile home Motion carried 4-2-0 with Mr Setliff and Mr Burgess dissenting 30. Berry/Carter Motion to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8 10 P M Respectfully submitted, I // �� s 1�. N�wirExecut retary APPROVED AdO`r // Sanfors'i .61r airman ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ift/10 LLC( C ) v ITEM # MEETING OF /w MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED I/ CO 1 IMENEZ i COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO • , VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL , COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER _MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 23 I MOVE THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P.M. We, the undersigned, as residents of the Sunrise RV Resort, 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction, Arizona, have considered in full the ram- ifications of allowing the on site sales of National Prebuilt Man- ufacturing Corporation (NPMC) Park Model RV' s within the premises of the Sunrise RV Resort. We hereby petition the City Council and Officials of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona to grant whatever change necessary to the existing zoning of the Sunrise RV Resort to permit the Sunrise Joint Venture to sell Park Model RV' s to the public within the boundaries of the Sunrise RV Resort. N ADDRESS , �8, DATE 1 /9d 3 IA) c��t0� -y -/��t 2 'r‘Cq 7‹ /'!'(, C /A d 3 (e t /L(r&S (x3a 4 743 ___17,4ZA 3) )00 e$ V iy4) i e '-'1\- -s-sCmo r r 4 17/Y14 5) \`d A. L V-,. ,., ‘ `\0 3 L►.1 4°27 l `\ ' '1(o A 6) n.we-ez.i.- 717 i',10 3 ev. &,,P 9 .5,- cf: 7) ea.�.e Tho-- / 11D3-- W402- r_ 7.6 8) - 1 'JO3 La , Ill 9- W -F6 9) L—gfi' t I( /k 6 3 w z --4--k,6 i 1°)Af ig �.yzi- /yo. IAA _046_ 1. 11) Q�.iv./� o< <,eiGr 4 ,,T L!/-�� ,77 7s V�� 12) de e - --- ((o3W (76. /AA% 13) ` 77 CC;L'f tn, - / 93W , Ccc7 $773 _ma_ 14) /4/03 W 15) /41O3l�J It.Z #ffe___ IV,/ 16) / Y 3 W •� r.3g6 7-I 3--, 6 17) 4t 140 3 lf/ 3,6 q//��e 18) C�JG/ r - ,7t. /go 3 2/- 19) //GL w, iv. �ovndd �yGovl r�s.,. J 4/O3 At B,2t1S►dz./".- S8' eY/G-$r6 2 0)- -4- tea- / Sao 3 60 t e A&�o9 d 9 21) "-V � �yoi Y-, ©7-4 -Y� 2 2)j /Ai v.,%���ij c „l�c4-, W..e-lJ /4'a 3 e nv -s 9/�-eec 2 3) / li a 3 w 1^/6"-ie 2 4) (., :� �� `it 0 3 VI/ e% -��� /f f 7/‘ ` Ice. __ _ . 2 5 / ./C . tM-a L /'4 3 i. ) 'y2 5 9-1 d� 1 2 6) J, G{'4 e 0/4-pr,-n /Ll a3 tO .492oed& 17 5 9/!/A6 27) 28) 29) 30) 31) 32) 33) 34) We, the undersigned, as residents of the Sunrise RV Resort, 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction, Arizona, have considered in full the ram- ifications of allowing the on site sales of National Prebuilt Man- ufacturing Corporation (NPMC) Park Model RV' s within the premises of the Sunrise RV Resort. We hereby petition the City Council and Officials of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona to grant whatever change necessary to the existing zoning of the Sunrise RV Resort to permit the Sunrise Joint Venture to sell Park Model RV' s to the public within the boundaries of the Sunrise RV Resort. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1) � `/21a _gib /'/3 W J will 696 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 20) 21) 22) 23) 24) 25) 26) 27) 28) 29) 30) 31) 32) 33) 34) AW We, the undersigned, as residents of the Sunrise RV Resort, 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction, Arizona, have considered in full the ram- ifications of allowing the on site sales of National Prebuilt Man- ufacturing Corporation (NPMC) Park Model RV' s within the premises of the Sunrise RV Resort. We hereby petition the City Council and Officials of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona to grant whatever change necessary to the existing zoning of the Sunrise RV Resort to permit the Sunrise Joint Venture to sell Park Model RV' s to the public within the boundaries of the Sunrise RV Resort. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1) ? - -()16 2) Alf,e7ZeAcied 976 a/ 9- -S=4 3) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 20) 21), 22) 23) 24) 25) 26) 27) 28) 29) 30) 31) 32) 33) 34) O S We, the undersigned, as residents of the Sunrise RV Resort, 1403 W. Broadway, Apache Junction, Arizona, have considered in full the ram- ifications of allowing the on site sales of National Prebuilt Man- ufacturing Corporation (NPMC) Park Model RV' s within the premises of the Sunrise RV Resort. We hereby petition the City Council and Officials of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona to grant whatever change necessary to the existing zoning of the Sunrise RV Resort to peiluit the Sunrise Joint Venture to sell Park Model RV' s to the public within the boundaries of the Sunrise RV Resort. NAME ADDRESS DATE 1) /9 d: G� 7 _I 2), 64/74- X -_,!7 /Y(G J l / g .4%ti>7. �� 3) i 17 1/2e�-0.- NO3 b.> Lis. 7 7/ 3//c 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 20) 21) 22) 23) 24) 25) • 26) 27) 28) _ 29) 30) 31) _ 32) 33) 34) ROLL CALL 6: 6 qtgi V/ q/7 (a ROLL CALL IP ESENT ABSENT l MAYOR HILL 0. 4 W S. ' VICE-MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ! '' ���/// / ii COUNCILMAP�! JIr�EraEz i _ COUNC I LWOMAN TAYLCR / V COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER s J COUNCILMAN 11A1A0 II kif COUNCILMAN EIDSON ! t TOTAL i " STAFF PRESENT li, 5. CITY MANAGER ' a gv CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly 7 a r FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis �// v/ r DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Chuck Newcomer ,yj . DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY Bill McDaniel / . / / • / DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman V CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch _ GR'llii D4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoeph V / R SUPERINTENDENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Jeff Bell k DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY Pam Loui `AILS CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: /flAm4L L 271e9/NG DATE: 9//G/e(o ADDRESS: Iy 0 3 GJ. .eei/QDaJ,4 y AGENDA ITEM• IQ