Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 12.02 City Council Regular Agenda ' ,?ACHE Aft, PLEASE FILL OUT A "QUEST TO SPEAK" IF YOU -- Gti WISH TO ADDRESS THE ,JUNCIL AT CALL TO THE ��� PUBLIC OR ON ANY NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM. U ��;, N ��►y Z gRIZoNi- 5 t y O� /?7 ac/ie unction APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 DECEMBER 2, 1986 7.00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA (All items marked with an asterisk (*) will be considered by the City Council as a group and will be adopted with one motion. No separate discussion will be held on any of these items unless a Councilmember wishes to do so. In this case, the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ) *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of July 14, 1986 *3. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of July 23, 1986 *4. Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of August 11, 1986 *5. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of November 18, 1986 INTRODUCTION OF DISTINGUISHED VISITORS AND GUESTS AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC CITY MANAGER' S REPORT .•. 1. Public Forum - December 8, 1986 2. Award of Block Grant PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 528, PZ-30-86, Application by Albert and Judith Folsom and Daniel and Carolyn Rafferty to rezone a 2 1/2 acre parcel , located on South Royal Palm Road approximately 330 feet south of Southern Avenue, from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. (Postponed Item) 7. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 550, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (With the Emergency Clause) 8. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 551, AMENDING CITY CLASSIFICATION PLAN 9. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 552, Amending the Apache Junction City Code, Chapter 8 Business, Article 8-6 Swap Meet Operations. (With the Emergency Clause) 10. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 553, Amending the Apache Junction City Code, Chapter 3 Administration, Article 3-1 City Manager. (With the Emergency Clause) OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS 11. SELECTION OF DATE FOR MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW 12. DESIGNATION OF DATE FOR GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING 13. APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATIVE FUNDING TASK FORCE 14. APPOINTMENT OF CITY MANAGER 15. EXPIRATION OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-20-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 120) 16. AWARD OF BID FOR PROSPECTOR PARK CONCESSION STAND 17. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-44, IBM SYSTEM/36 OPERATING SYSTEM PROGRAM FINANCING 18. IMPROVEMENTS TO INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND MERIDIAN ROADS 18a. SUPERSTITION FREEWAY LANDSCAPING 19. SEWER AND WATER ANALYSIS 20. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, DECEMBER 15, 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, DECEMBER 16, 1986 21. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL 22. ADJOURNMENT "THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING THIS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS." CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING JULY 14, 1986 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on July 14, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hill called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Jimenez Councilwoman Taylor Councilman Baljo Councilwoman Gardner Councilman Eidson Vice Mayor Bakkedahl (arrived at 7 02 p m.) Mayor Hill Staff Present City Manager Michael J McNulty Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer Director of Public Works Rich Broman ( City Attorney David Alexander f! Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Others Present Mr. James W. Morrison Ralph Andersen & Associates 1446 Ethan Way, Suite 101 Sacramento, CA 95825 AGREEMENT WITH RALPH ANDERSEN & — ASSOCIATES FOR RECRUITMENT OF CITY MANAGER Mr. James W. Morrison, consultant with Ralph Andersen and Associates of Sacramento, 1446 Ethan Way, Suite 101, Sacramento, California, 95825, gave a presentation on the procedures for recruiting a city manager, and also explained that the cost is $12,000 with additional funds for related expenses Councilman Eidson stated that it is unnecessary to expend funds for this purpose, as the usual application process would be sufficient. Councilwoman Taylor asked for a consensus from the Council that should they expend these funds for the recruitment of city manager, that they only hire in this manner. Councilmembers agreed. Councilman Jimenez MOVED THAT THE AGREEMENT WITH RALPH ANDERSEN AND ASSOCIATES AS A CONSULTING FIRM FOR THE RECRUITMENT OF A CITY MANAGER IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,000 PLUS RELATED EXPENSES BE APPROVED. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 14, 1986 PAGE 1 4,-"771' Amok Asook, Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Baljo, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed Councilman Eidson The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Hill adjourned the meeting back into the regular Work Session at 7 35 p m ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. NORMAN S. HILL Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk I SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 14, 1986 PAGE 2 ar-s CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING JULY 23, 1986 'oak The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on July 23, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Vice Mayor Bakkedahl called the meeting to order at 6.30 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Jimenez Councilwoman Taylor Councilwoman Gardner Councilman Baljo Councilman Eidson Vice Mayor Bakkedahl Councilman Absent Mayor Hill (on vacation) Staff Present. City Manager Michael J. McNulty City Clerk Kathleen Connelly City Attorney David Alexander Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer Assistant Planner Julie Reid PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-28, REVISED COMMUNITY NEEDS, 1985 CDBG PLANNING GRANT) Assistant Planner Julie Reid nave a brief description of the Community Development Block Grant Program, and the purpose of the proposed Resolution Nos 86-38 and 86-39, one purpose being that the City will committ local funds as leverage for the CDBG application Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer stated that one reason for this is to qualify larger areas of the City for funding. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO 86-28, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, IDENTIFYING ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEEDS AND ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN TO MEET SUCH NEEDS. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-29, COMMITTING LOCAL FUNDS AS LEVERAGE FOR 1985 CDBG PLANNING GRANT Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-29, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, COMMITTING LOCAL FUNDS AS LEVERAGE FOR THE 1985 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 23, 1986 PAGE 1 /1a ^ �--s Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried ADJOURNMENT Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 6:44 P.M. �\ Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. NORMAN S. HILL Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk t\ SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 23, 1986 PAGE 2 �s CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AUGUST 11, 1986 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, /'ik Arizona, was held on August 11, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Vice Mayor Bakkedahl called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Jimenez Councilwoman Taylor Councilman Baljo Councilwoman Gardner Councilman Eidson Vice Mayor Bakkedahl Councilman Absent: Mayor Hill (on vacation) Staff Present City Clerk Kathleen Connelly City Attorney David Alexander Assistant Planner Julie Reid Others Present Mr. Jon Hinz 5550 E Superstition Apache Junction, Arizona Dr. Barry Sutter 927 E Mesquite Apache Junction, Arizona PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-31, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Amok BLOCK GRANT PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-32, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT IDENTIFICATION OF COMMUNITY NEEDS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-33, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MINIMIZING DISPLACEMENT PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 86-34, COMMITTMENT OF LOCAL FUNDS AS LEVERAGE Assistant Planner Julie Reid explained that these resolutions are part of the process for the Community Development Block Grant application, and Resolution No. 86-34 is committing local funds as leverage for the CDBG application. Councilwoman Taylor explained the requirements for the use of the grant funds, and the proposed use for a handicapped facility, and stated that this type of facility should not be placed in a residential area such as the proposed area of BLM land City Attorney David Alexander stated that should the money not be utilized as stated in the application, the funds would have to go back to CAAG Councilman Jimenez pointed out that the use for the funds is not in question at this time, but the approval of the presented resolutions. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 1986 PAGE 1 111”771r Vice Mayor Bakkedahl stated that it is not uncommon for a community to receive CDBG funds and have it taken back, which is probably why this opportunity for additional 1985 funds has been presented. Councilwoman Taylor stated that she has not objection to proceeding with the application, but that the use of the funds should be further reviewed because of the criteria. Mr Jon Hinz, 5550 E Superstition, Apache Junction, addressed the Council on the use of CDBG funds for a /.11N handicapped facility. Dr. Barry Sutter, 927 E. Mesquite, Apache Junction, Vice-President of the Community Foundation, also addressed the Council on the use of CDBG funds. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-31, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND CERTIFYING THAT SAID APPLICATION MEETS THE LOW AND MODERATE BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-32, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, IDENTIFYING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEEDS AND ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN TO MEET SUCH NEEDS, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED, AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-33, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING A PLAN TO MINIMIZE DISPLACEMENT AND ASSIST PERSONS ACTUALLY DISPLACED AS A RESULT OF ACTIVITIES FUNDED IN WHOLE ORDINANCE IN PART WITH 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED, AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-34, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, COMMITTING $11,618 OF LOCAL FUNDS AS LEVERAGE FOR THE 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motions. Councilwoman Taylor stated that she objected to this on the basis that a program such as the proposed use may cost the community in upkeep of the operation. Councilman Eidson amended the motion THAT THE CITY NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR UPKEEP OF OPERATION OF THE PROGRAM The amendment died due to lack of a second. VOTE: In Favor Councilman Baljo, Councilman Jimenez, Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed Councilwoman Taylor The motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO PERSONNEL BOARD City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated that due to one resignation and three terms expiring, the Personnel Board is lacking a full Personnel Review Board, and that Mr Gary Collins is the only present member who has expressed interest in being reappointed, but that there have been additional Talent Bank applications received. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 1986 PAGE 2 40"73 on lb. Oak Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT GARY COLLINS, RICHARD OLTMAN, GIL VERLEY, AND SHIRLEY VITALE, BE APPOINTED TO THE PERSONNEL REVIEW BOARD Councilman Eidson seconded the motion VOTE: In Favor Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Eidson Opposed Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Jimenez, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl /mik The motion failed. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT GARY COLLINS, RICHARD OLTMAN, AND ANNE SURRA BE APPOINTED TO THE PERSONNEL REVIEW BOARD Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. Councilman Jimenez stated that since there is not a full Council, possibly the appointment of all of the members could be delayed for a future meeting. City Attorney David Alexander stated that there is not a meeting scheduled at present, so the appointments could be delayed, but the Personnel Board is required to meet once a year so the appointments should not be delayed to long. Councilman Baljo and Councilman Eidson withdrew the motion and second. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT GARY COLLINS AND ANNE SURRA BE APPOINTED TO THE PERSONNEL BOARD. Councilman Jimenez seconded the motion. VOTE: In Favor Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Baljo, Councilman Jimenez, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl Opposed- Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Taylor The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:18 P.M. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion The motion carried. ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. NORMAN S HILL Mayor SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 1986 PAGE 3 r—s ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk I SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 1986 PAGE 4 • CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 1986 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on November 18, 1986, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER /rsi► Mayor Hill called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Councilwoman Taylor gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Mayor Bakkedahl led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Baljo Councilman Eidson Councilwoman Taylor Councilwoman Gardner Vice Mayor Bakkedahl Mayor Hill Staff Present- Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Deputy City Clerk Lori Clark City Attorney David Alexander Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer Controller Keith Lewis Director of Public Works Rich Broman Director of Community Services Jeff Bell Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson Others Present Ms Fawn Nicklaus 2876 E 12th Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona Mr. Dave Watson 810 W Apache Trail Apache Junction, Arizona Mr Sam Warren 740 W. Apache Trail Apache Junction, Arizona Mr. Keith Stachar 6301 E. Roundup Apache Junction, Arizona Mr. Kent Sharp Dowden Group REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 1 -7".121111111. — p rs 1 Piedmont Center, Suite 410 Atlanta, Georgia 30305 Mr. Mike Davis, Chairman Economic Opportunities Action Team 1800 S. Buena Vista Apache Junction, Arizona ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA uilman Eidson MOVED THAT CONSENT 1� AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1, 2, AND 3, BE ACCEPTED AS Co PREncSENTED. Introduction of Distinguished Visitors and Guests Mayor Hill acknowledged State Representative Roy Hudson, and former councilmembers Jerry Burgess, John Granillo, and Tom Damiano. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS None. CALL TO THE PUBLIC Ms Fawn Nicklaus, 2876 E 12th Avenue, Apache Junction, addressed the Council with a complaint that a "turn-around" was taken out during the construction of the new intersection at Highway 60 and Apache Trail. Mayor Hill stated that this is creating a problem, and that staff would meet with Arizona Department of Transportation to discuss a solution. Mr. Dave Watson, 810 W. Apache Trail, Apache Junction, also spoke in opposition to the removal of the turn-around. Mr. Sam Warren, 740 W. Apache Trail, Apache Junction, stated that the removal of the turn-around is affecting his and other businesses CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Acting City Manager Kathleen Connelly stated that in response to a recommendation made at the Apache Junction Growth Conference, the Public Works Department has organized another city-wide "Clean-Up Week", to take place the week of December 15th. Ms Connelly also called upon Director of Community Services Jeff Bell to introduce the new Youth Services Coordinator Director of Community Services Jeff Bell introduced the Youth Services Coordinator, Stephanie Johnson, and gave an update on the status of the Youth Services program. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 518, CONTINGENCY FUNDS Councilwoman Taylor requested a postponement for 90 days, and further explained that this ordinance pertains to funding for social service project and acquisition of water companies which are not appropriate at this time Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 518, BE POSTPONED FOR 90 DAYS. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 2 �s AsIN Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 536, PZ-37-86, DAV SUPERSTITION MOUNTAIN CHAPTER 30 Ask, 1 ) Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer requested a continuance of the public hearing, until February 17, 1987, as the applicant's representative is ill and will not be able to attend until that time. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 536, PZ-37-86, BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 17, 1987. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 548, PZ-41-86, FEHRENKAMP Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer briefed the Council on the request for rezoning of a 2.1 acre parcel, located on the northeast corner of Delaware and Superstition from CR-5 Multiple Family Residence to C-2 Local Commercial District, and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and staff both recommend approval of the application with stipulations, including the sumittal of a site landscaping plan prior to development for approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Keith Stachar, 6301 E. Roundup, Apache Junction representing the applicants, requested approval of the rezoning. Councilman Baljo stated that the requirment for a site landscaping plan prior to development is not appropriate, as at the present time the City has no ordinance to provide guidance for such a plan. omik Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO 548, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows: ORDINANCE NO 548, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 3 - - AIM 14. REZONING CASE PZ-41-86, FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE TO C-2 LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 548, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. 1 Councilman Baljo amended the motion THAT SECTION I GENERAL, STIPULATION NO. 2, LANDSCAPING PLAN PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, BE DELETED. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE (on the amendment) Unanimous VOTE (on the original motion) Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 549, AMENDMENT CITY CLASSIFICATION PLAN Acting City Manager/ City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated that when the budget was adopted on June 26th, the City Council made a provision should a need to reclassify particular clerical positions ocurred during the budget year, and the cost could be contained within that department budget, the Council would consider that request for reclassification Ms Connelly further explained that this request is in regards to reclassifying the Payroll Accounting Clerk in the Finance Department, to a Finance Secretary/Payroll Accounting Clerk with a total cost for this year of less than $500 Mayor Hill asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the request. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Hill closed the hearing to the public. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 549, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows. ORDINANCE NO. 549, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 549, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. Councilwoman Taylor pointed out that the additional amount necessary for this reclassification comes directly out of the Finance Department's budget, not the General Fund. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 4 e--1"' Amok VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. OLD BUSINESS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 86-41, PURCHASING FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL (Postponed Item) ) ) Ms Connelly explained that this resolution is a recommendation by the League of Arizona Cities and Towns to establish a policy, should the Council wish, to provide for purchasing from members of the City Council. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-41, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, ADOPTING A POLICY AND PRESCRIBING PROCEDURES FOR PURCHASING FROM THE MAYOR AND ANY MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL, BE DENIED. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. Councilman Eidson asked if this Resolution is denied, can the City purchase from members of the City Council. City Attorney David Alexander replied that with certain stipulations, according to State Law, it is permissible. Councilwoman Taylor added to the motion AND FURTHER THAT THE CITY CLERK/ACTING CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO PREPARE AN ADDITIONAL RESOLUTION STATING THAT "THERE SHALL BE NO PURCHASING OF SERVICES OR MATERIALS FROM CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. Councilwoman Gardner, having made the second, agreed to the addition to the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. Amok Mayor Hill explained the purpose of the resolution to the public NEW BUSINESS DESIGNATION OF TEMPORARY LEGAL HOLIDAY ) Ms Connelly explained that due to the Christmas holiday falling on a Thursday this particular year, staff requests that the following Friday also be designated as a temporary legal holiday Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT FRIDAY, DECEMBER 26, 1986, BE DESIGNATED A TEMPORARY LEGAL HOLIDAY AND THAT CITY OFFICES REMAIN CLOSED ON THAT DAY. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 5 W--s Mayor Hill recessed the meeting. Mayor Hill reconvened the meeting CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT Acting City Manager/ City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that interviews have been conducted to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Frank Jimenez, and should the Council choose, they may fill that vacancy at this time. Councilman Baljo expressed his opinion that this seat has been vacant for some time and the time is appropriate to choose an individual Vice Mayor Bakkedahl stated that a new member should not be appointed to the Council, prior to hiring a new City Manager as that new member was not involved with the interviews, and this appointment should be postponed. Councilman Eidson agreed that a Councilmember should be appointed at this time. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT MR DEANE JONES BE APPOINTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF FRANK JIMENEZ, TO TAKE OFFICE DECEMBER 2, 1986. Councilman Baljo expounded on the qualifications of Mr. Jones. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion Vice Mayor Bakkedahl stated that the Council should take the time to discuss these interviews and applicants in either an Executive or Work Session, as this is a very important decision VOTE: In Favor Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Eidson, Councilman Baljo Opposed: Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill The motion failed. Councilwoman Gardner asked for a legal opinion on an alleged previous vote on this appointment by Councilman Eidson. City Attorney David Alexander replied that legally this does not constitute a conflict of interest. Councilman Eidson stated that he has not taken an active role on this issue Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT PENNY SECOR BE APPOINTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF FRANK JIMENEZ. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE: In Favor Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Taylor Opposed Councilwoman Gardner, Councilman Baljo, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill The motion failed. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT TO THE SEAT NOW OPEN ON THE CITY COUNCIL, BE POSTPONED UNTIL FEBRUARY 16, 1987. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 6 oak Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor Councilwoman Taylor, Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill Opposed Councilman Eidson, Councilman Baljo The motion carried. /'k, A member of the public questioned the wording in the motion Mayor Hill called a recess to allow for listening to the tape to confirm the motion. City Attorney David Alexander and City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, upon listening to the tape, confirmed the proper wording. Councilwoman Taylor MOVED THAT THE APPOINTMENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL BE RECONSIDERED. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor Councilman Baljo, Councilwoman Taylor, Councilman Eidson Opposed: Councilwoman Gardner, Vice Mayor Bakkedahl, Mayor Hill SELECTION OF DATE FOR GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING Acting City Manager/ City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that due to time required to allow for advertising, a date for the General Plan public hearing should be selected at this time, and at the November 17th Work Session, the Council had indicated they wished to have a work session prior to the public hearing. Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer recommended dates for the work session and public hearing Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT A GENERAL PLAN WORK SESSION BE HELD ON DECEMBER 18, 1986, AT 7 00 P M IN THE Amok CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUILDING, AND THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC NOT BE ALLOWED PARTICIPATION, EXCEPT FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF AND REPRESENTATIVES OF BRW. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. Councilman Baljo explained that the purpose for not allowing public participation, is to allow the staff and the consultants an opportunity to deliberate on the General Plan prior to the public hearing. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. DIRECTION ON CITY SALARY STUDY ) Ms Connelly stated that there are funds designated in the current budget for a complete salary study, and that the desire of the Council was to have this study completed prior to next year's budget, and asked for direction to proceed with soliciting bids for the employee salary and classification study REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 7 .... .•r Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE PROCEDURE FOR SOLICITING BIDS FOR AN EMPLOYEE SALARY AND CLASSIFICATION STUDY, BE POSTPONED UNTIL A NEW CITY MANAGER IS HIRED AND MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION AS TO AN APPROPRIATE TIME TO PROCEED, UNTIL FEBRUARY 17, 1986. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. Councilwoman Gardner suggested the Acting City Manager conduct an in-house classification and salary study Vice Mayor Bakkedahl expressed the opinion that this is a complicated study and staff would not have the time to complete such a study. Councilman Eidson suggested that Ms Connelly look into the problems with department head classifications only, at this time, and also stated that the salary study should not be postponed but stopped entirely. Councilman Baljo and Councilwoman Taylor withdrew the motion and second to the motion. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO BEGIN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR AN IN-HOUSE STUDY OF THE EMPLOYEE SALARIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS TO CHANGE AND OVER-COME ANY INEQUITIES THAT MAY EXIST, AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COUNCIL Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. EXPIRATION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PZ-50-84, ORDINANCE NO. 316 ) Director of Planning Chuck Newcomer explained that Ordinance No 316, PZ-50-84, a planned development on the corner of East 16th Avenue and South Winchester Road, was a proposed project of 68 unit townhomes, but the parcel has been purchased by the Catholic Church, which plans to develop the property as a church site Mr Newcomer further stated that the planned development has expired and recommended that the parcel revert back to the original zoning classification of CR-1 Single Family Residence Zone. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ZONING CASE PZ-50-84 (ORDINANCE NO. 316), HAS EXPIRED AND THEREFORE SHALL BE REVERTED TO THE ORIGINAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CR-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, THIS CLASSIFICATION BEING DEEMED AND APPROPRIATE DESIGNATION FOR THE SUBJECT SITE. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried TRANSFER OF CABLE FRANCHISE FROM DOWSAT OF ARIZONA TO DOWDEN CABLE PARTNERS, L.P.) City Attorney David Alexander stated that material has been presented from Mr Kent Sharp, of Dowden Group, explaining that transfer of Dowsat of Arizona to Dowden Cable Partners, L.P. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 8 Or"? Amok Amok does not require the original application process as not more than 50% of the cable license is being transferred. Mr. Kent Sharp, representing the Dowden Group, 1 Piedmont Center, Suite 410, Atlanta, Georgia 30305, asked if there were any questions from the Council, and further explained what was ocurring with the company. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT CONSENT BE GIVEN TO TRANSFER THE CABLE LICENSE NOW HELD IN THE NAME OF DOWSAT OF ARIZONA, INC , TO DOWDEN CABLE PARTNERS L.P. AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED, "NOTICE AND CONSENT TO TRANSFER CABLE FRANCHISE". Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried WATERLINE EXTENSIONS FOR NEW CITY LIBRARY Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that funds were approved in the budget for phased water main extensions to serve the new Library , and requested that authorization be given to execute agreements between the City and Arizona Water Company. Councilwoman Gardner MOVED THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY AGREEMENTS FOR PHASE TWO EXTENSION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY WATERLINE, AND TO EXPEND $18,427 FOR THAT PURPOSE Councilman Baljo seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM PROGRESS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph outlined the Progress Report submitted by the Economic Opportunities Action Team Mr. Mike Davis, Vice-Chairman of the Economic Opportunities Action Team, 1800 S. Buena Vista, Apache Junction, elaborated on the recommendations in the report, in particular the need for an industrial park development in Apache Junction. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE PROGRESS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED; AND THAT THE ACTING CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO INITIATE STEPS FOR REZONING THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 32 FROM CR-1 TO CI-1 IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY GENERAL PLAN, AND THAT THE PROPOSED POLICY STATEMENT REGARDING CITY PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF STATE LAND IN SECTION 32 FOR INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPLEX AS SPECIFIED IN ITEMS 1-13 BE APPROVED. Councilwoman Taylor seconded the motion REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 9 VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR SIGN MATERIALS AND MOBILE RADIOS ) Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson stated that four bids were received for sign materials, and seven for mobile radios, and recommended the bid be awarded to Roadside Signing for sign materials, and to Motorola for radios /... Vice Mayor Bakkedahl MOVED THAT THE BID FOR SIGN MATERIALS BE AWARDED TO ROADSIDE SIGNING, IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,373.14, AND FOR MOBILE RADIOS TO MOTOROLA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $718.00 EACH. Councilman Baljo seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR IBM SYSTEM/36 AND LICENSED PROGRAMS ) Controller Keith Lewis stated that three bids were received for the IBM System/36 and one for Licensed Programs, and recommended purchasing the used IBM System/36 from Phoenix Computer Group for $45,363.61, and one licensed program from IBM for $5,580.00, and another program from DLH/INE Corporation for $10,000.00. Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE BID FOR AN IBM SYSTEM 36 BE AWARDED TO PHOENIX COMPUTER GROUP, IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,363.61, AND FOR LICENSED PROGRAMS TO IBM IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,580 00 AND FROM I DLH/INE CORPORATION FOR $10,000.00. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion. Councilman Baljo commented that since the City is working on enforcing the sales tax, that will pay for this system. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, DECEMBER 1, 1986 EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION, DECEMBER 2, 1986 ) Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 5:00 P.M. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM; AND THAT EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M., AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M., ON DECEMBER 1, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M., ON DECEMBER 2, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Councilwoman Gardner seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 10 r. The motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Vice Mayor Bakkedahl reported on the East Valley Partnership meeting. ^, REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Mayor Hill asked how the landing pad lights are progressing. Director of Public Works Rich Broman stated that the design and cost is being investigated. Mayor Hill requested that the staff look into what can be done about the "turn-arounds" taken out during the new intersection construction. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Baljo MOVED THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 9.20 P.M. Vice Mayor Bakkedahl seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. *Consent Agenda Items are as follows *1. Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda *2 Acceptance of Minutes from Special Meeting of June 26, 1986 *3. Acceptance of Minutes from Regular Meeting of November 4, 1986 ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF , 1986, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. rik NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 11 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES itfi) V)/1; • ,j4j// I e ty/ I ITEf1 # MEETING F 'y am r1 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER 1/7 - / MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL tr-1 ITEM NOS. 1-5 I MOVE THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, AND 5, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. r PROPOSED MOTION - ITEM NO. 1 The council may wish to consider this motion in order to address the city manager appointment and make arrangements for any necessary code changes at the same time: I MOVE THAT THE REGULAR MEETING AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AFTER MOVING ITEM #14 APPOINTMENT OF CITY MANAGER BEFORE THE OPENING OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, AND I FURTHER MOVE THAT ITEM #10 UNDER PUBLIC HEARINGS BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1986, AND THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ACTING CITY MANAGER TO MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE TO REFLECT THE ADOPTED PROVISIONS OF THE CITY MANAGER CONTRACT AS REQUIRED. Lit PQ A 2 ✓ „O-' tz U w: 1�j't`tq. zZ qR��' �P �zl y uz pacheunction May 14, 1985 MEMORANDUM TO Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council '' ?C) THROUGH. ,4Cit Manager n FROM. Director of Public Works 'mil REGARDING: US 60/SR 88 Intersection Agenda Item The initial design concept report has been received from the Arizona Depart- ment of Transportation who have requested comments. Attached is a copy of said report for your perusal and consideration. RIDE S h Approver for Agenda 14 Attach ADOT Design Concept Report Date,, Item First Reading 5/i/.. - / Second Reading Public Hearing — Old Business V New Business Consent Agenda File. 100 051 C01 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 • ,.. elk ITEM NO. 11 (Option 1) I MOVE THAT THE INITIAL ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT, DATED APRIL 20, 1985 FOR THE JUNCTION OF U.S. 60 AND S.R. 88, BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. 7,-&/1 ., ' ' S— 2 //C5 5 -/ -i-7 -`- / / I MOV HAT TH INITIAL ARIZONA DE ARTMENT OF TRAIJSPO TATION DESIG. CONCEP REP RT ATED P �z *. . 1 85,�FOR THE JtINCTION� OF .S. 60 ND S . 88, E �P RI 0, \ . �_ � / PROVED H THE ,, OWING 'CONDITIONS: t : - sr + z .7- t s. fr. < ? -C'4 }�'L„ ✓''Z- . r+ -....'1: .iw V .. -;. . .r ki Gfi tat . ♦ .. - ,.7 � 1 ram.fiy5 'ya r + ^2, ' fu, +f i , � z J-4 s t �. �� rrtea. - -- hK, "F -".`t� y ,r �.'' rst4 .,� •V .- ; T- -, r� y•R y`t.k'S� lk'` � '}i•" y a d.✓r .� , r^ •* ^kl�it- 'i .J.r .{ J4 7 .AL.nS .. t MYyi ,fi} xy 'S -t r aJk xt 4;� W- C - �x7 }+-w I-4¢* rYsSy ✓ r sX.ed. � „ .C- s. �c - Ng.$ s . _ F i` F J - 1. • st, �r + mo !'. , ,.,, , fY*} I r. � rM.2 • t Sr . ; , �H .+ic . ♦ / > ., 'it 2y > .srZ'^( , 'n ... r ...t:„ . - 31T .A £ ta.. -r,' 4 ,, a, t' ,;:,,,....5 Fort4l�2 . :may! � ._ 4} ,: ,,T,� -l'-� n . 0 t ''.n r t �♦ "� �'. r; ;`t rL5,... s ! y lsz.R ' , . 3:. is _r+ +, •ry,a,,t • ws 3»4y y J ;, o .ri:' " lp � at � . r ' .a" 'r. � } �a sue` ..,. .1,,,...v.-..,, i:• :4......,.,.. ... „..f , „144 s " 4 ,: ":� " :)n. 14I-- 115 'fe i ,. U,35' -._--- ,.. . , •,7 ',I . s ••”, MM.% 1 0).01 tP. f .' .. . il.-..- -..! ••• k!'lk 1 1.1 ____ _SI.-.... I • ..,•41. i il .,-,:"(..2''.• 1. ,A . t 1 ,t st - , .............. •-•-..... ' 1 .t. •••• 3• I ' ,,,,,,A • 441-g...f.p. .144,, .: .,..,,r -----.. .. i : . • •I --tdmass___vt •!...-i.. ,., e.'%' ,. { '" y. ,.• 1,-., •• s) '''fl) I ' ) ;1 , k 4 I ; .. _ rile '.:i: J1*,, .4 ' r; • 1 __Ej •clif..... 7." ! 400 IL ',4,1 "N °144.• .,,. ..... .:I •1 ri .,..9r _ i • ,t' , . i ,,iii,1 :.4 , „,b,, f ,..i.,-, .14,-: ....,,,,,_.,.:.tc.i._..____fo.......,-4 •:. 4ha. „lit f:i . '., ‘ , .. ii ,..„,„„.._311,,..„ i. -s-€'01 . ....# ... • ., i 1 4:i -...) ,--I 4c• kJ!, N • 4 1.' *0•0' 90•0:.•i •••• 1 1. J C:3 0 I • . il I; - • •,1?6 Pi I 63. •:'•::i... ' 1•4 ., • CO II •• It r .„ .... i .4. i --- .sti 11 jr, 1.i . f 1 I /ii. '11 .,..-- .1. • • i ..0, **•\ N1-1. t'• • • . • . ...4"..." 1 • ••• r -2-1; ••••4 ; I) , • 1 11 4' %..• T '.„ '..,., .,}.1.f., •-4, , ,ka. -.4'. ;4 401\i: 1 ' • 1. ' '1 F I ' ,... ,• P•ii • 1: 4• 40.- ,- I•• ,•01 • 1....• 1 ........00. .- " •/° . • I • .3 t 1 0 ' •4•1r1•••:1 .. • •:, (.., .,•.4 x:-. 4:r , ' e#. ?'11 - .-.'. 4 3 . ...‘•,•-.•••.:.:-•;,.'t t:•,e e Aq4Ir,i 4!",.f••i.,r.•1.m,.-.7,r1i..,f e,,p.4,-•",,..•,•6•,•:,f,i4"•t-,f,:,*e.,., .'• I • „,.,. I . I a i . i;7•0'.4,. 1'.i ' -o,ItL1..-,.....•1.."-.V-1.1,,8 • ,.._e r...,,,....•.ileOt• •1*4 r -i1„.,,... . ,....4.--..,. 4 . 1i1 , ...... ... - , ri,, •-_=-"' t‘'''','• :-I '`v ' •v,,,cr'.'1'..' : .."4"••••--=-6. 1 '''•'100•••°1 a, s • - ..7.\-.: : c)• ' A 1 ,1".2Y0 4.4*.•..:. .„.C. _....• •. •::, a .) i ., ..tit.,,..r.id, ?... •ke.f '11 ' • . if - . •- a, is I I r.t....• • , I , -,, - , •.• P • ;:. I. .. . , '. \ r'' • / F 1,. ,_,..,. .1 - s .- 4..., 0••. ..1 it. U.:C'‘` . ds. ,_ • Cla•••?..,C'' •,...,i.., ,. .... , ...., . .. 1 , tit/ . -r.7„, "., ,••' ,.?"r"Ilitrii);,.1.1-4' i".7 P r5P/ott t _ fi• .... iii, a a,':'% ' 101 'k.••4OF Abo. .r.......E.,r,....14...........tro,., • - ...""•-3""‘""ZIMIZZriiiiiwitkiiii qt, ...tr . t:. .1....Ter., ' .7. . 1 .'" " .''.' ' . . i'':: tAli.244,1 . il 1.1 P)! 1 2 g 1 t: '7.r. ('‘ 1..0...MC. :\44:::ii.::,11 .t ''1' • I.' "4.1k.....- ,. "'• :.'......,..., ,1 -.....,'4 -• ,.:.24 ;ii..!•-'-......, ,'(..ir' it, :11 ,,••• .I: - s. rt. iv,.... \., .. .. •.1,,,„•• ..- I ...t..,. ,._. az. ,... , t t‘...dak.,-* ,•."'4: ' i Vs.%Aa''',11-1,14.62/4041Vt,tc‘:••.'‘•:;4::.....'....%:e46.:ttfi .3 • .....Jf i„...... . I ...,:.....„,,• .... , ..„. y - , ......,-70.../,.., i ' , ..',.aTi:•ii‘tt..,$•;73,!;!;...iii ,. .!.... ,z...t. i..,... . . ,,,. .., r., ,‘.-'.6 4 is:'%•,i' :: Nt4.....„,..11 Apell...i .p y.,z..01.3,. ..4,,‘.4A A, •. t " ,-.N.▪. , ,..r.i.3,.....tq 9,,,,,,,,,,:,............, • -. ., ,...... :-..v •i 44lit- - 1ii..,/ • . i '' k. '-'4,11:11' ••.,"•-•.-*;/.1••••ttr•;'.. \•••\s'• 1.. . , 40 i'f-----...z ,t.s.• • , ‘,4 kz.... ... \,t••,...,.....t.,,,• ,..:,..;,-40- :„_-.....w.„-- -,, , ,,, iy,...." r.# *,IA N, •,‘ Oft% r.•44.--, en- ' '. *. -• .c...!..:1 .'"' '• k3t, 1‘4J. .0.r:414,,T....,...P.*-.4. /41414,...I1. ' i ,1`.., '",, ,,... 1/......../ -: . :, r,," '''''''N.. .. .'..',.-.1:,Iv• ''''-....;, ... et ' .,..4.... \ ' 1 it '1-- ' I 11 --., ..i.,..tty _ ... .• i ,, ;,,.., -,1„. : ,,,, .,.... ....„ .,„...N4A ' ! l . .1,,„/.4. • '. •'-.. 4 •fl!. . **-- .,*•.' I ••.•: • , ,f ,kr, 41, ' a• .. . . ,•%.\,i\•..it t• ` \ s Y •-',, , • • 1 Pk... i.•..4.042( . , Or ••.,.''4•• • '...` ' !...* 1 ..* .'• ',. 1 , a.. . :44. ..., ,... •• ka••• - ri. I- .iiilv s .le .1:4111% i ttri,..1:11. , ..* • , .., ,.„„,..,r( .,. % • ., .08 „. . .1f‘; , --r- ..... ski -•.." .,'4#..,.•!d.:q,4c,•..„:. . '. , 7 I ,,I.; „,,, \it. iii - .., 2' '•.:.-,. i••.t„ ,t,•04 .........1." "SO*:V I til• I g e. , •:\. .:1!.1.6.• • ••••^T.: 45,- •‘. \'.kr'. 4s}..‘,,, t -`---, &%.4.". . t.i .0,'.7...1.... • ''',' 'ilf ' , '.., '„.., :!: ,..1 h.:tit. Nori s , .r. ,q.,: 4 v .,,,::.c) "1-/;.'d , , te--.4... - •-...v.... , :'.. , '',..1, 1-:•,...,...i. f V,,;‘,...i• f :Jr 411..V.,t,, ....;.:1 ."...-• 1-1:::-.4.,1_. .„1........ • is*. '',..,..:‘,*:::,•• . ,•• i .,.r•• ;. - . 4:i :.: •e-. el ; d,c4..., 4„. , ;;;-1 . .0et:-.;,,11=f7,...c:'''' #41Ki!;'-. :9-d4i., . : . ..,441. • . et . -s.::::.:.,..,•,,,-4,;.,.,:.,, :.,,:. - •-. -.tis-•,... , : : . - '-'''. 7 - •• ''''" -t'iartre•-• . ••-•1.--,'"-!,.. y-,-/en.'"; .. !,lift,'>',,,,•1"71 ...i?;:1'._.., ....!: ...'r•;,,i, s ;..; ..„•,,,..iii.ii4,-4- .1., r sic: ,k.t. t4.,soz 1 .0... • . ,.,,.,,,,ic ii,..- •-lie, , ,',.,.:•_,,c ,.. ;1 iir,,; v j. --" .,' . $ ,i••• „,,,, .1.1 k1•41,4. 4:7 ', 'C Z 46 'it ^:•;:.•1','4Ir "',1,t8. •'`•f",.., .'" %i ' •• P :14 1 .,.,..v„szt. :4?,. .c,..,‘,7,/ . .. •NA\ ..44 .•••'' 4it r''..* .4i -..... -# --,.•45 ..::.,...' •-..m./ .. • .4-1,1,:ktv..y,.F.... :L.,k ., i .^, 2- • 1 . 41"4- ''....1 , , .t. t„.... •-•;•4, ...9,?; ..- k..:t., 1114 ....: •ie e 7..e.; vim 1,..e,,-.D : --mu._... .... . '1 . i k'4 ...t...-- .... • , .... , ,. ,.,,, . 7 1 ?,i' • ,+ tilpiiiiiit, : .....::?1,1'?01014 v./ ?`4. 7 ••:.. `••L' • . ..,- .. 4 iye ,' 171 • '-'1 ••''.4.1' "'P''''. t..; -6). " . e I % *‘' a • ii .:f -• i't.,. • •. ,.., ,-, 1, ...?-4' • • •••- , . ,.., ,, .. .. . . ..., r-___-_-'n- 1 -f•a;. • /4 I . ., ____-_, ..z. .‘it • • •Z,.4!..... Al ...4 .4 .. • • . ..,!:ef r•fr.,-,1, ,. , 4, .:1 .,. ..".);}41 ::: • ..?. A$4.4 • i .4 ' =4 :11' .r;:.• ,...,.:1•.;‘...!..:. 4,•...Y,.'.'y t ot•e.;.••..•.e..r,.•.•."•..•`•••-',,..i.1 t,.:4v.7*S•''._0 tr&•.y•'a,•4 r.J..l.1.-'1.A e-'h1.C•e.i-,,:,r;,('-'esi'4,.,}"#'•:1',-/•••,i•,i/,1 03 41/A/."/.•7•••//,•*.4b s i-1,)4f1.'4$'''''i,,'Y•r!i',ol,•>/./1,44.,,.,t•.4',:F„ i.':.,'1 Z 4'IA/-'t e1/t.'.,.••1:4>',4,,I.`'•,7..'•.'•.:..4.-7't".•0,. I.„k..ii'w,.i•.',•t7„--1-1-•./71,1,t1."n'j.o-ift..tv--.,.P...,f.....!-.zf.i 14,.•.t1.4., ra\7-4•/' ‘':'',.*.••_'4A,A,A-...:A 1 1. ' ii 4 ; ii-1 ,i7/.%r.‘e.....4.•.4•4-'•,,,.."•.v•-t•.'...-.-,.N•,'r.,"4 4h t..,-,•.._..r,'t .1 e 1t•r' 0,141-.:„,.-. ;•.' ,-4Aa_5V,;' z,....... F.`- '3'45 - -- ••'te ji ' Vill.".1'.71,*•• r . 's, . i:ia -• '' '%I .- ,. , ,,, ,..4- A ,, 4 . ,.,,,r; ,.... ... ,. ‘;41 Vo.. .,_ . .,, ; :.;'rri17,„ • 7 .., ic 4:4,s :...1 •!. 0.,qi,•,...,..0.,1:,.• '.7 ;'. /' .... :•11 • 41 re:ts. '''e--"..\, "l'i ,.' '. Pe.:- ; 1-0 ;- '7. isd .. ,... •...g,%.,-'it ri ,-',/.• ,.•, . •(• •a-1. 7' • •4/ f . r 4041g, .. .• ..." ...,., ..1 •••• • .0., ,,..dia,,,,r.; ,,... r.-!'• ,;*':, ''' 11.•' .1-e' •%4 '1"••4 e t ,..k.' 7 • • Xs -_,Iyt ,!/- . ' , , etir',..... • 0. .4,,.,,r,- ,,,, ...,,, ,,-, ,.. , .. :,. .. . , ,„, ,,..,.., ,-/ .• 4„az,.,. , ,...-.4., 4,-, ,, . , roA,t, , 1)1 4 -1',.."1.:..'''., , _",• ';r 1 i firralii.Ili •IqK All% 4". •.Z. l' .I., .1,9 1.4..:',..c-lc. --.... ',.:z-stiv.,,t,,, . - ..Ppli. ,,, ..,,„..,'.' .r 1 . r' •:44.... '`% . gig ,...jc.1, . . •1., • ,.,•,? •Left ??..-.••.11 l'• ` ,,,r.../1 • •--"......... r •1.16." )'' • 41 .,, • . :: ' . ..4$ • 4'1 ;,-• V . 10. N ' ' tr k. .r/ 6 e, • -,., ... -.5„,,o,;ti • /K., .. • %)t- . \,- -.'" - • -i. : • •r .1. s•-.41. 0,iti -,••,r... " I , N....I , tit? ... ... al .' .. ' 1/11•1\• "• -4 A411 ir " ae;•,,,t••• , •'',I., ' ' cbj?, i..z, •v,;,•,,:..', . .-w.,.,, 4,4#I,,) , / tb Id , - ,.., , v.., e• • •eia.,1 - Ini, \ / '--4,1 40 t • .4'2 r...u.‘ ;11 ,:- .,f ‘,41. .,,- 0, ..-:1•• • ,i'litir'' Ak * ,, ' it4 1( ., •/.fief '4'ci- f l 'i •:•..";'" 3.' , . 44 ' / /•• : .$,.* •••••i-- ‘1.41,0 ;,.-... , ' - -t.,; •cia.. / • kr. Oak k• i 'i 1 .ir,,,ti 0'_ ......•...-, z'lc* / ti; • - ''..",14. , I r-"'sr' '''''f'. .' o *41, ;. .*f;M.'4?' Tit' _..., - - t`‘ '7-3 ---- .....1::„ - s •• ,A, hummer - .•--' t----. . , ... .‘ ,.... , ,),.... ,. ... , .. - ... .32rxIte--- --1,, ,,,,,- '4, • •-te i '•),..flat• ' .4 ., , ,t .•„ -• 1.'114.; ------Irt"". i' '' ; ,*.,______&•4,,,.1 11.. .111:4314.,.... 774--• ',""-i*.-1.--:: 7 ' ,T-lear.t---"-it46,,.,2a,• '''' •i•'..--. ,-.. , •-••. e. t .-..-‘• . ---- %. „4is..4.1 ,• ..., . i ;;F-W ' *.'° It 141.0 or , K - • ...1 -4, zi 4 .,••r -, ,A. i 4 1 � New construction will include concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks along U. S . 60 and State Route 88 Phelps Drive will have concrete curb and gutter only. Some driveways into existing businesses will have to be relocated, but access into existing businesses will be maintained. Relocated driveways will be determined during the final design phase. New sidewalks will be constructed that will transition into existing sidewalks. New roadway profiles will be constructed close to the existing profile elevations Existing drainage patterns will be preserved but will require the extension or possible replacement of existing culverts . Four existing median crossovers will be removed as a necessary safety enhancement, the two at the junction, the one immediately west of the junction, and the one immediately east of the)(-±\„, junction _- Some of the existing landscaping will be removed so as not to detract from driver safety Revegetation will be incorportated throughout the project area once construction is completed This project is programmed for fiscal year 1985-86 and is estimated to cost $1 , 032 , 000. The programmed cost for this project is $1, 175 , 000 III SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS A Lana Use The junction of U S 60 and State Route 88 is surrounded by a mix of various commercial land uses including plazas, eating establishments, service stations, and a hotel complex . This combinption of land uses is expected to continue into the year 2000 as indicated by the Apache Junction 2001 Land Use Map (October 31 , 1983 ) - E Existing Street System This project will result in only a minimal impact to the existing streets in Pnache Junction Phelps Drive, which extends south froT eastbound U S 60, will be slightly realigned where it ccnn,_cts with the highwy The .ac'.-e Junc t : cn C; t^,' Council recently vote° to delete a Lc --e - _ c ,_ - _ e frc•„ the city street system This Sc <_' r tends ._s c,-n U S 60 north for e•pproximate ly 700 f( e , longer provice access to U S EO westbound upon ceTpietasr. cf th, s project Abanded city right-of-way will revert ._r:c r to the pie : 0,: _ p: c..:c-rty owner ( ) . Plaza is i \,e win 1 continue to p: °vide access to the shopping center from the north Depe, c:ng on the rate of development north of the project area , the City does plan to construct a new road that will connect Pl. ',=za Drive with State Route 88 This project is not antic: gated to occur before 1990 -3- z L t�N• AdoempA 0., zf - ,'� ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAYS DIVISION 141.2': 206 South Seventeenth Avenue Phoenix Arizona 85007 BRUCE BABBITT Governor September 4 , 1985 CHARLES L MILLER W 0 FORD Director State Engineer Mr. Arthur G. Grandlich Grand Hotel & Resort Grandlich Investments 201 West Apache Trail Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Re : Project F-022-3-536 Phoenix - Globe Highway U.S. 60 at S . R. 88 Apache Junction Pinal County, Arizona Dear Mr. Grandlich: Thank you for your recent letters of August 27 and 30 , 1985 re- garding the above-referenced highway improvement project. The questions and concerns outlined in your letters relate to design features and right of way effects of the proposed project. In the interest of providing appropriate answers and information regarding these concerns , copies of your letters have been forwarded to our Design Section and our Right of Way Section for consideration and reply. You can expect to hear from each of these sections with infor- mation relative to their respective areas of responsibility. The project is in the early planning stage and final decisions have not yet been made concerning design and right of way matters . Generally , these issues are concluded after the environmental review process has been completed . However , should you wish to discuss these areas further at this point _7 the process , please feel free to contact Mr James South , telephone 255-7270 regarding right of way concerns., and ir Terry Otterness , telephone 255-7341 concerning design ratters of the project. i -1 1- '"•G A VS • AERONAUTICS • MOTOR VEHICLE • PUBLIC TRANSIT • ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING t Mr. Arthur G. Grandlich Page 2 September 4 , 1985 Your participation in our environmental review process is appre- ciated. If we can provide further environmental assistance please contact Mr. Craig Seppelfrick of our office , telephone 255-7767 . Very truly yours , PHILIP A. SHUCET , Manager Environmental Planning Services PAS :JLS : sl cc: Terry Otterness James South -12- ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAYS DIVISION Traffic Engineering Section PGP-5A-1-1 June , 1982 SUBJECT: MEDIAN OPENINGS Paragraph 1 . Purpose 2. Definition 3. Policy Statement 4. Approvals 1. PURPOSE To establish a policy for the design and spacing of median openings on divided highways lacking access control . 2. DEFINITION A gap in a median providing for crossing and turning traffic. 3. POLICY STATEMENT The purpose of a divided highway is to promote the safe and efficient movement of traffic. In order to avoid inconveniencing motorists and diverting business from abutting properties, median openings should be designed and spaced to channelize left turns and U-turns into an orderly pattern without impairing the basic design features of the roadway. Median openings should be placed as near as possible to the subdivision lines of the public survey sections. Where practicable, subdividers of abutting lands should provide parallel frontage roads to minimize the necessity for median openings. All median openings shall be designed to include median storage lanes for both directions of travel . The length of storage lanes shall be determined from appropriate traffic data but shall not be less than 100 feet. The length of taper shall be determined from the design speed of the roadway. Median openings at intersections shall be established to provide access to improved public streets at a spacing which provides for adequate left-turn (U- turn) storage lanes. The spacing between median openings at intersections shall not be less than 330 feet. -1- PGP-5A-1-1 June , 1982 Median openings between intersections miy established for public safety and convenience if indicated by an appropriate engineering study, provided that : a . In an urban area , the opening is not closer than 660 feet to an intersection with an improved public street or another median opening . eN b. In a rural area , the median opening is not less than 1320 feet from an intersection with an improved public road or anotner median opening . Median openings may be established for business generating relatively high traffic volumes, provided that: a . The minimum 13ft—turn traffic volume is 500 vehicles per day or 100 vehicles during the peak hour in urban areas wnere the major street speed limit is less than 40 miles per hour . b. The minimum left—turn traffic volume is 350 vehicles per day or 70 vehicles during the peak hour in (1) urban areas where the major street speed limit is 40 mph or greater ; (2) isolated communities having e population less than 10, 000; and ( 3) rural areas. c . The distance to the nearest adjac•7,nt median opening is not less than 330 feet . For the purpose of this policy, an urban area exists where property abutting the highway is 50 percent developed and improved for minimum length of one—half mile on either side of the roadway and a regular pattern of side streets has been dedicated and improved for public usage . A rural emN area is a location not classified as urban. 4. APPROVALS The need , placement and design of median openings must be approved by the District Engineer before they are installed . —2— PUBLIC HEARING 1 . FOR ORDINANCE NO. 528, PZ-30-86 2. WILL THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE COUNCIL ON THIS CASE , AND PRESENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 3. WILL THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN PLEASE SPEAK ON THIS CASE . 4 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE? 5 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS CASE? 6. IS THERE ANY REBUTTAL? (APPLICANT / THOSE IN FAVOR / THOSE AGAINST ) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING ^, CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE r;iii.CHE�Gti Z \ _ r "9PIZ0NP ity o 04ache 2unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL' THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER",- THROUGH: 7 'CHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: Y'JULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 PZ-30-86 (ORDINANCE NO. 528) BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Albert and Judith Folsom and Daniel and Carolyn Rafferty REPRESENTATIVE: Daniel Rafferty LOCATION: on S. Royal Palm Road approximately 330 feet south of Southern Avenue CURRENT ZONING. General Rural GR PROPOSED ZONING: Single Family Residence CR-2 (MH) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Residential NO. OF PARCELS: Two COMBINED GROSS ACREAGE: 22 acres COMBINED NET ACREAGE: 1.98 acres CURRENT LAND USE: South parcel - vacant North parcel - block structure/shed SURROUNDING LAND USE: North - mobile homes South - mobile home East - vacant West - mobile home SURROUNDING ZONING: North - General Rural GR South - General Rural GR East - General Rural GR Agenda Approved by West - General Rural GR Date Item # SITE CHARACTERISTICS: unremarkable Consent Agenda Public Hearing "DI l Old Business New Business Postponed Item /` ,E' 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 8002 The Honorable Mayor'd City Council - PZ-30-86 - Agra Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Two PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Through changes in ownership, four lots of 11,000 square feet could be created from the North 14 acre parcel and three lots of 11,000 square feet could be created from the South 14 acre parcel . Staff notes this request does comply with the General Plan designation for the site. Although the General Plan designation for the site is residential and the density is correct, and although there are RV and mobile home parks in the vicinity, staff does not feel it is in the best interest of the community to have small individual mobile home lots in this area. Properties north of Southern Avenue used conventional construction methods with a combination of duplexes, four plexes, and single family homes. Other property in the vicinity east of this site is either undeveloped or developed by conventional construction methods. Development of this site should either be by conventional housing methods (single or multi-family structures) or as a mobile home/RV park or subdivision. As a mobile home/RV park would require a minimum of ten acres, this could not be accomplished unless combined with surrounding properties. Properties in this neighborhood are 14 acre with one mobile home. A rezoning of this nature would be considered spot zoning and would set a precedent for the neighborhood. Should this occur, adjacent properties would probably follow suit. Several of these adjacent properties abut Southern Avenue and with the prevailing use of private drives for access to small lots this could complicate normal vehicular traffic, school pedestrian traffic, and school bus traffic. It is anticipated that increases in traffic in this area due to construction of the new freeway within 3-5 years will occur. Staff, therefore, would recommend denial of the rezoning request. If approved, staff does recommend stipulating the dedication of the East forty ,,.k feet (40' ) of Parcel One and the East forty feet (40' ) and the South thirty- three feet (33' ) of Parcel Two for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at the intersection of Royal Palm and West 26th Avenue. PLANNING AND ZONING RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commision at their regular meeting of August 12, 1986, after public hearing, voted to adopt the following motion: (M/S Conway/Callahan 5-0-0) . "I move that the Commission recommend to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case PZ-30-86, an application of Albert and Judith Folsom, and Daniel and Carolyn Rafferty for their property described as, a matter of public record, requesting rezoning of Parcel No. One from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone and of Parcel No. Two from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) Single Family Residence Zone. The Honorable Mayor City Council - PZ-30-86 - Agell'a Item - Sept. 2, 1986 Page Three The reasons for this recommendation are: 1. It will set a spot zoning precedent. 2. It is not in the best interest of the City. 3. With the increase of traffic, we don 't need it right there in that area. " STIPULATIONS IN ORDINANCE The applicants dedicate the East forty feet (40' ) of Parcel One and the East forty feet (40' ) and the South thirty-three feet (33' ) of Parcel Two for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20' ) by twenty foot (20' ) cutoff at the intersection of Royal Palm and West 26th Avenue. JAR:CRN:j1 PZ-30-86 GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2(MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE Southern Avenue MH CORRAL/SHED TT AS VACANT 2nd RESIDENCE //7714, VACANT E.26th Avenue MH MH MH MH b 0 .r I s VACANT I b a TWIN PALMS cc I 0 RV Park I N ASUBJECT SITE LIMITS OF ZONING (REMAINDER IS GENERAL RURAL) Scale: 0 200 400 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REZONING APPLICATION 1. I/We hereby request a change of zoning classification from: Parcel No. 1 From LiaLtet-z_k L u la L\L,To ? crt Cr 2 eN 441r 4 2. According to the City's General Plan, what is your property planned for? 3. Size of your property: (712/ of///z / " acres [ ] square feet 4. What is built on your property now? 5. What has been built on the property next to yours? ff 'I North nu-, 1.1-0c t South V o P i c._ 11C, Ceti= East 1-144,-)pf-,C= FA-e.vvi West MDR ( l E.tovvt b. Legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned: 1\1 �z 5 e Kt E !� N E- /q ICI 1J << S . 3 Section ,n , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. 7. What is your County Assessor's Tax Parcel Number? IO2.' 2J -008 C t- ocy j3/ 8. Why are you requesting this rezoning? / � Ovi? C-l�C- Q b,v& I�C) � i c 1 D G61 PC-;-"' Ci To :3 Pr1 s? Lv "i . (Please Complete Reverse Side of Form) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case Number r2 -'x- Y( Proposed Ordinance No. Date Filed 'l- 1 - 5'6 Application Received by: 1, Receipt No. (-2,'/ Fee Amount ? CC Page 1 of 2 Revised 4/25/85 9. I/We do hereby certify that: a. (I am) (We are) the owners of the property described in this application for rezoning and have attached copies of deeds, title reports, or other c documents as proof of ownership. b. I/We have read the rezoning procedures and requirements and have truthfully completed this application for rezoning. c. I/We understand the filing fees are non—refundable, the rezoning process ' to involve public hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and action to approve our request is discretionary. d. I/We understand in order to obtain approval of this rezone we may be ra,. requested to dedicate portions of our property for public roadway and associated purposes and that the Ordinance establishing the rezoning, if approved, will not become effective until all required quit claims are received and recorded. e. I/We being the ownArs of the property in this rezoning application have appointed VAN K l P T\ as our representative in this rezoning application and have authorized him/her to do anything necessary to have the rezoning considered favorably by the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. (Representative is to complete Item #10 of this application ford..,) (1) ALCil.12-1 Lf..)C,111 cr -�*'l l 4,j) (Print ner's Name) Signatur -9 o .o. ,a ‘4 Ls- - "4?©9 (Mailing Address) Phone Number) t4-� ....a 7..G City, State, ip Code) , (2) bill 1 l::L_ F%-it- 7_,T ( • ` � , ' ( ,,e,,1,_,- y i kJ Name) (Print Owner's ig ature j l/ C ►0(a3 G . )Li)c��%e_ 784 - l�3.s` (Mailing Address (Phone Nvaber) Ats. City, Sta e, Zip Code) Z (3) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) — (4) (Print Owner's Name) (Signature) (Mailing Address) (Phone Number) (City, State, Zip Code) STATE OF f1'/Z.0 N7r) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged befo e COUNTY OF �i/t/� L ) m SS me this ,7c/A day of --=?i«, �_. , 19 �( , y. __ i My Commission Expires. e7"-.,)r - -, __,-4-c: i dam X- / "-c''(Lt NOY PUBLI 10. 1 hereby certify that 1 have been appointed by the property owner(s) in this rezoning application as their representative and that all pRrespondenc this matter be mailed to me at their st. \J , �I�N+C-t_ t(1-4.-.1 --r , rint represe ative s name (Signature o repr e tative 1&,-E) E . t3oit ER i ing ddress t hdne n nDer s 2. 2.20 ity, State, ip ode STATE OF,�- /? —_-v7) The foregoing instnment was acknowledged before SS. me this.- o//i day of <-F-u_, , 19 �: COUNTY OF 4 //1/A-L ) by '- c mm My Coission Expires. Cj�- -)-4/\_ ./—,-,- )/ 1Y._c f NOTARY PUB (,/ Page 2 of 2 •—:311' ORDINANCE NO 528 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-30-86 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-2 (MH) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Zoning District Map, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, for the parcels of land described as. the North 2 of the Southeast i of the Northeast i of the Northeast i of the Northwest i in Section 33, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and the South z of the Southeast i of the Northeast i of the Northeast i of the Northwest i in Section 33, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona be and hereby is amended from GR General Rural to CR-2 (MH) subject to the following stipulation: the applicants dedicate the East forty feet (40') of Parcel One and the East forty feet (40') and the South thirty-three feet (33') of Parcel Two for public roadway and associated purposes along with a twenty foot (20') by twenty foot (20') cutoff at the intersection of Royal Palm and West 26th Avenue. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 19 Norman S Hill Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 46-09 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TA J OR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ji COUNCILMAN EIDSON 1 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL Ci(LL •'.-7- SHEET 4 pilfi)‘ NOTES ,7 / I) 0 k • t6g \,,,-' fiiyi (five a< . ,„ , e,i/ i ,/,'/' v r i) ()it, ?0,11T4 8 / 0-)' 9' A/,) cv v, //44, ITEM # MEETING F MOTION BY: (, ),)14,511t/t) SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER 17 - COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR ✓ COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ✓ COUNCILMAN EIDSON //' MAYOR HILL UNANIM US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL I111 . 4 --r■r11r ITEM NO. 6 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 528, BE Step 1 READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 528, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 528, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED) . OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 528, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1. FOR ORDINANCE NO. 550, TRAFFIC DEVICES rook 2. WILL THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4 . IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE ("V!..CHt Jo U i r►""r , z -..i-- —- 0-- "lPrib\APs V it (J 04pache c&unction NOVEMBER 13, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER YLI FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS4 .6--y DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY WEN'!. REGARDING: TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (AGENDA ITEM FOR DECEMBER 2, 1986) Attached is Ordinance No. 550 in regard to the installation of Stop Signs for your consideration. RWB:JDB:th Agenda Approved by "(1---- Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing / // ; 7 Old Business New Business Postponed Item File # 309.013 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ^ s ORDINANCE NO 550 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS FOR STOP SIGNS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL It is in the public interest to insure safe, effective and efficient traffic flow along public rights—of—way within the City of Apache Junction, Arizona and it has been determined that traffic control devices are necessary for the public safety Now, therefore, be it ordained that stop signs be designated at the following locations. Westbound on 9th Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on 10th Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Fred Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Friar Avenue at Winchester Road. Westbound on Kachina Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Linda Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Mesquite Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Montebello Avenue at Winchester Road. Westbound on Navajo Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Osage Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Peppertree Avenue at Winchester Road, Westbound on Quail Avenue at Winchester Road, Eastbound on 9th Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on 10th Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Kachina Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Linda Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Mesquite Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Westbound on Mesquite Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Montebello Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Navajo Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Westbound on Navajo Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Westbound on Osage Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Osage Avenue at Royal Palm Road, / , Eastbound on Pepertree Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Quail Avenue at Royal Palm Road, Eastbound on Foothill Street at Ironwood Drive, Eastbound on Windsong Street at Valley Drive, Westbound on Windsong Street at Ironwood Drive, Southbound on Raindance Road at Southern Avenue, Southbound on Descanso Road at Southern Avenue, Northbound on Vista Road at Superstition Boulevard. Furthermore, the Director of Public Works and the Director of Public Safety are hereby empowered and directed to initiate appropriate action to install and enforce said traffic control devices SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. ems ORDINANCE NO 550 PAGE TWO SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of any violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required by Chapter 12 of this code constitutes a civil traffic violation. Civil traffic violations are subject to the provisions of Title 28, Chapter 6, Article 20 and 21, Arizona Revised Statute, and amendments thereof SECTION V EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1986. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS _ DAY OF , 1986 NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM David F. Alexander City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r r 0P/6443L1((fr. ITEM # MEETING OF //ZAP MOTION BY: f SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAANGA_RDNER ,, IV COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 60/4. /POITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: c,t)Or° Y S NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER Y COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL UNANI""OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 7 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 550, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 550, BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 550, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 550, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1. FOR ORDINANCE NO, 551 2. WILL THE ACTTNG CITY MANAGER SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4. IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE Ask, Amik, 0ACHE✓G �« fi a3j ,wu ti� s 3 ,‘ s. %- \\\„....... '41R,ZoNP V it y 4 04 pache unction November 26 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 551 -- AMENDING CITY CLASSIFICATION PLAN In accordance with council direction given at the time of the adoption of the present fiscal year budget , the Economic Development Specialist has submitted a request for the reclas- sification of his only other staff member from a Secretary I designation to a Secretary II . You have included in your packet , the request as submitted by Mr. Schoeph along with a job description for the Secretary II . The level of responsibility for a Secretary II is greater than that of a Secretary I as is the higher degree of skill. I concur with the request for the reclassification. The responsibilities of the position have expanded considerably because of the off-complex location of the Economic Develop- ment office as well as the fact that all facets of the office operation are maintained by one person. Adoption of Ordinance No. 551 will make the necessary changes in the city classification plan. ed„ kmc Agenda Approved by Date Ite.-Il # Consent Agenda �, c Pk.bitc Hearirg /•;�2/"C Ola SJsiness New Business Postponed Item —, 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 rCHt✓,.cz4, n J IRIZONP' cOity o C pache cOunction November 19, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY CLERK/PERSONNEL DIRECTOR FROM: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST f SUBJECT: RECLASSIFYING SECRETARY I POSITION TO SECRETARY II DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT I am recommending reclassification of the Secretary I, Range 9, position with the Department of Economic Development to Secretary II, Range 12. This position is currently at Step B on the City of Apache Junction Salary Schedule. The reason for this recommendation is that this position requires a high degree of automatic word processing skills, general office operations experience, a minimum of direction, judgment in research and organization of information, as well as dealing with the public in person and by telephone on matters of a confidential business nature. The position has grown from basic secretarial duties to broader office responsibilities since February 1986. The net cost of this change would total $515.82 during the last six months of the current 1986-87 budget year. The change can be accom- - modated within the department's existing budget. A job description for the secretarial position with the Department of Economic Development is attached. It is recommended that the change be effective by January 5, 1987. JMS:bsp Attachment 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 SECRETARY II DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF WORK: Performs varied and responsible secretarial , clerical , and basic research work under the direction of the Economic Development Specialist. Instructions are given at the beginning of new assign- ments, however, an employee in this position is expected to perform with relative independence and work is normally reviewed or verified upon completion. An attention to detail and an ability to establish and maintain effective, positive business relations with the public is essential to successful performance in this position. EXAMPLES OF WORK PERFORMED: Operates a variety of office machines including typewriter, ten-key, copier, word processor, and transcriber. Types letters, memoranda, reports, statistical charts, forms, questionnaires, and other material for publication or distribution. Acts as receptionist by screening calls, making appointments, answering written and oral questions and inquiries for routine infor- mation, and receiving visitors to the office. Establishes and maintains routine and complex clerical records and prepares accurate reports from such records. Performs all clerical related duties of the office including errands. REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES: Thorough knowledge of business English, spelling, and arithmetic; knowledge of modern office procedures and practices is essential . An individual in the position must demonstrate an ability to type a mini - mum of 50 words per minute accurately, and to transcribe from tape recordings. Some basic knowledge of word processing is preferred although an ability and the desire to learn word processing is accep- table. Am, oink ORDINANCE NO. 551 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABIITY. Amok BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I IN GENERAL In accordance with the City of Apache Junction Personnel Policies Rule V. Classification. Section 2 Adoption, Amendment and Revisions of Plan, the following amendment shall be made to the Classification Plan "Position and Salary Range" for the City of Apache Junction That the Economic Development Secretary I position presently classified at Range 9, within the City of Apache Junction be reclassified to Secretary II and classified at Range 12 on the adopted classification plan. SECTION II EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this amendment to the Classification Plan shall be January 2, 1987 SECTION III REPEALING CONFLICTING POSITIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provi- sions of this ordinance, or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION IV PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for „Auk any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the vali- dity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THIS DAY OF , 1986. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 1986. NORMAN S HILL Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 551 PAGE 1 of 2 Amok ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM i^ DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney I 0.\ ORDINANCE NO. 551 PAGE 2 of 2 '" ifafaYl ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ))CC /(Lj Yf )) ( v ITEf1 # MEETING OF t4, MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: .P1411) YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL 'ft. COUNCILMAN EIDSON y COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL UNANI"^OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF ( 09 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: °,10114, Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER V MAYOR HILL J , UNANI""OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL a ITEM NO. 8 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 551, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 551 BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 551, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 551, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING 1. FOR ORDINANCE NO. 552 2. WILL THE ACTING CITY MANAGER SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM. 3 . IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4. IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE Agenda Approved by �— Date ISem # P@ACHE ✓G Co: ::aent �O y'i ; ri ,0 Puc h i.... '17 3,,t ,, ,,, , O Old Business --- .�— il1 �� wt� ' New 6USU CSSItem —_--' Postpc> ed P Vity ot padre unction RIZON November 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM• ACTING CITY MANAGE1'v SUBJECT: SWAP MEET VENDOR APPLICATION FEES PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 552 (WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) As discussed at the previous council work session, the city is presently losing a considerable amount of revenue by not licensing flea market/ swap meet vendors on an individual basis. The revenue is lost not only by not requiring a business license, but by the non-payment of sales tax. Proposed Ordinance No. 552 would enable the city to begin a vendor licensing program and would require the payment of an application fee for certain types of sales. The space fee presently in effect would remain for all vendors. Hopefully, this last provision would offset non-payment of sales tax as well as impose some kind of requirement on those vendors exempt from the actual application fee. By requiring the completion of a city business license application, a record of the vendor would be established for future sales tax collections. The designation of the fees has been deliberately left blank since the council had indicated that there would be discussion in this area. I have written the ordinance with the emergency clause since it would be wise for the city to begin its immediate implementation since we are in the time frame when the bulk of swap meet vendors are renting spaces and selling their goods. Attached for your review are copies of the potential revenues that could be realized by the city based upon certain fees, as well as a copy of the existing code provisions and a traffic count taken by Engineering. Please note that 20,420 vehicles entered the swap meet located on Apache Trail during a three-day period last weekend. This count reflects only those vehicles that used the main entrance and does not take into account any walk-in traffic. It is obvious from these counts that the city is losing a large amount of revenue each day that is continues unregulated. Elaine James will be present at the work session to bring you up-to-date on her study of vendor practices. kmc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ORDINANCE NO 552 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8 BUSINESS, ARTICLE 8-6 SWAP MEET OPERATIONS, SECTION 8-6-6 SCHEDULE, REPEALING ANY CON- ORSFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PRO- VIDING PENALTIES; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That the Apache Junction City Code, Chapter 8 BUSINESS, Article 8-6 SWAP MEET OPERATIONS, Section 8-6-6 Schedule, shall be amended to read as follows Section 8-6-6 Schedule A. Effective December 3, 1986, and until thereafter amended, all swap meet vendors shall pay to the swap meet pro- prietor a Business Occupational Service Tax in the amount of per day for each space or stall rented or leased by the swap meet vendor at the swap meet All such fees shall be payable at the same time as the rental fees prescribed by the swap meet proprietor B. Effective December 3, 1986, and until thereafter amended, all swap meet vendors renting or leasing a space or stall from a swap meet proprietor at a swap meet shall pay to 1[ the City of Apache Junction a Business License Application Fee in the amount of $ if such vendor is engaged in the sale of any new goods, objects, wares, commodities, personalties and intangibles, real estate, amusements, food concessions, services or any antique goods, objects or wares All such fees shall be paid to the City of Apache Junction prior to the rental or lease of any such space or stall except for those vendors who have paid such rental fees prior to the effective date of this amendment. All such vendors shall be required to pay the Business License Application Fee prior to commencing business on their next day of operation or prior to December 8, 1986, 5 00 p m , whichever is sooner C All such Business License Application Fees shall be based on a twelve month period, and shall be due and payable on or before the last day of the month twelve months from the month of issuance, and shall be renewable each twelve month period thereafter Delinquencies and penalties shall accrue as set forth in Section 8-5-9 of this chapter It shall be the responsibility of the vendor to notify the city of any change in status of the business. D. Payment of the Business License Application Fee does not imply any exemption or exempt any vendor from payment of the Business Occupational Service Tax or Transaction Privilege Tax as set forth in this Code ORDINANCE NO 552 PAGE ONE OF TWO eIN E. All swap meet vendors required by this article to pay such Business License Application Fee shall also be required to complete a City Business License Application upon payment of said fee SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the pro- visions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by refer- ence are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of any violation of or failure or refusal to do or perform any act required by this code shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not to exceed one-thousand dollars or by imprisonment of not to exceed six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as herein above described. SECTION V EMERGENCY CLAUSE It being necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1986. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 1986. NORMAN S. HILL Mayor ATTEST. KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 552 PAGE TWO OF TWO X-N-SWAP APPLICATION/SPACE FEE .JRX SHEET 950 SPACES FOR RENT AT PARK-N-SWAP MONEY THAT WAS COLLECTED FOR 12 MONTHS AT .50¢ PER SPACE $25,622.50 IF THE CITY CHARGED .75¢ PER SPACE, THE INCOME WOULD HAVE BEEN $38,433.75 IF THE CITY CHARGFT) $1.00 PER SPACE, THE INCOME WOULD HAVE BEEN $51,245.00 950 SPACES X $10.00 CITY APPLICATION FEE $ 9,500.00 (PLUS) 950 SPACES X $15.00 CITY APPLICATION FEE $14,250.00 (PLUS) 950 SPACES X $20.00 CITY APPLICATION FEE $19,000.00 (PLUS) 950 SPACES X $25.00 CITY APPLICATION FEE $23,750.00 (PLUS) $10.00 APPL. FEE $15.00 APPL. FEE , $20.00 APPL. FEE $25.00 APPL. FEE .50¢ $35,122.50 $39,872.50 $44,622.50 $49.372.50 .75c $47,933.75 $52.683.75 $57,433.75 862 .183.75 $1 00 $60,745.00 $65,495.00 $70,245.00 $74,995.00 THE ABOVE FIGURES SHOW WHAT THE LICENSE FEES WOULD BRING INTO THE CITY. KEEP IN MIND THAT THE MAIN INTENTION OF THE LICENSE PROGRAM AT PARK-N-SWAP IS TO START REGULATING SALL'S TAX COLLECTION. AT THIS TIME, THE CITY SEES VERY LITTLE REVENUE FROM THE SELLERS AT THE SWAP MEET. THE CITY IS LOSING A GREAT DEAL OF MONEY FROM NON-PAYMENT OF TAXES. -"A LICENSE PROGRAM CAN BE SET UP ALONG WITH OUR REGULAR BUSINESS LICENSE PROGRAM. WITH IN THE FIRST 12 MONTHS, WE SHOULD SEE A GREAT DEAL OF INCREASE IN REVENUE FROM SALES TAX. THIS CAN BE CHARTED ON A MONTHLY BASIS AND REPORTED TO THE COUNCIL AS A WHOLE. . .!-'l*.ri.,.1 .: (1 3-6-5 BUSINESS 8-6-6 0 z71 Zr D. The clerk may refuse to issue a proprietor's license for good cause state d. °z g c, E The clerk shall revoke a proprietor's license upon the swap meet --z proprietor's conviction of any violation of this article within o c _ three years of any prior conviction of a proprietor under this Z article. F. Before suspending or revoking a proprietor's license, the clerk shall give the swap meet proprietor prior notice, by certified mail addressed to the swap meet proprietor at the address of the licensed premises or by personal service, that a hearing to suspend or revoke -I the license will be held by the city clerk at a specified place, and m at a time not sooner than five days from the date of such notice. m The notice shall clearly and concisely state the grounds and reasons a relied upon for revocation or suspension. The clerk shall hold the hearing at the time and place specified, unless adjourned by consent of all parties, and the licensee shall be allowed to appear in person and by counsel , offer proof, and evidence. A record shall be kept of all the proceedings at such hearing, and a transcript of all evidence offered shall be made and filed. No proprietor's license shall be suspended or revoked except when grounds therefore as - provided in this section are satisfactorily established by the proofs offered as shown by the record of proceedings and transcript of the hearing. The decision of the clerk suspending or revoking any license shall be final . G. The clerk may suspend or revoke a proprietor's license upon evidence that a swap meet vendor is allowed to participate in a swap meet following three or more convictions of violations of this article within any three year period, unless the proprietor forbids the offending vendor from continued participation at the swap meet. Prior to suspending or revoking a proprietor's license pursuant to this subsection, the clerk shall notify the proprietor that a swap meet vendor operating upon the premises owned or controlled by the proprietor for the purpose of a swap meet sale has three or more v convictions of violations of this article within any three year 61 ' - ) , r-- period. iI ._ Sec. 8-6-6 Schedule • �Effective September 1, 1983, and until thereafter amended, all swap meet � vendors shall pay to the swap meet proprietor a Business Occupational Service Tax in the amount of .50t per day for each space or stall rented by the swap meet vendor at the swap meet. All such fees shall be j1 o payable at the same time as the rental fees prescribed by the swap meet m _ proprietor. Z __ 0 m Cn -65.25- Rev. 6/84 1---1- tL-A-t- v4A-\i GO ' i- ' - FRI 44-41 4390 SAT rjgoO 4T78 AT S ' •' ' :! i j i So.) 8 o7°1 \ I 500 �vrJ ..._ ( i ' _1 ._ __ 464 F2 I. _1- �.jT.- .. 1. say 1�:a 3 zo =1--4 5�rJ .i ., Cirz�yHOU W 1'0T i&-L._Vo Lu ►ne r -f --------- 4 i, 1 , II. . l ,_ 4�"" A VE__ /// P i . ,, 1-- - , , 1 , I ! 1 , I : 1 . i vgv 000 i SAr 3155 Iii COu,J rc rzs `T- /4T 9:66) F2/, A., SVd 324qOi O /CEAD /A/G5 -7"-,1 /eMA.J x►-r d - �� '7.' 30 A,,,) ,� �.) sv,J• Motif„ ( ( H PROPOSED AMENDMENT - ORDINANCE NO. 552 ITEM #9 SECTION 8-6-6, Subsection B: Insert the words "or used" in line 6 in between the words "new" and "goods" so that the section reads as follows: "if such vendor is engaged in the sale of any new or used goods, objects, wares, etc. " This amendment would serve to include those vendors who sell used goods on a full-time basis as a business. SECTION 8-6-6, Add a new Subsection F: "Individuals renting or leasing a space or stall at a swap meet for the purpose of selling their personally-owned household items shall be exempt from any Business License Application Fee only if such sales do not exceed sixteen days per calendar year. Such vendors shall not be exempt from the Business License Service Tax and shall be required to complete an "exempt status" license application form available at the City Clerk's office. This addition would exempt those people who sell their own personal items such as at a garage sale from paying the application fee. They would still pay the space fee as they are presently. Those individuals selling their own used goods for 16 days per calendar year or less would not pay the application fee. ITEM NO. 9 - PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 552: OPTION 2 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 552 BE ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS- THAT VENDORS RENTING OR LEASING A SPACE OR STALL AT A SWAP MEET BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THIS CODE PERTAINING TO ALL OTHER BUSINESSES LOCATED IN OR OPERATING WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANNUAL LICENSE AND RENEWAL FEES, PENALTIES AND DELINQUENCIES, PAYMENT OF SALES TAX, POSTING OF LICENSE AND COMPLETION OF LICENSE APPLICATION, LICENSE TRANSFER, LICENSES REQUIRED FOR MORE THAN ONE LOCATION, AND ALL OTHER PROVISIONS GOVERNING BUSINESS LICENSES ISSUED BY THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AND AS MAY BE AMENDED. I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CASUAL SALES OF PERSONAL HOUSEHOLD ITEMS BE PERMITTED UP TO SIXTEEN DAYS PER CALENDAR YEAR PER VENDOR BEFORE THE OBTAINING OF A CITY BUSINESS LICENSE BE REQUIRED, BUT THAT SUCH VENDOR BE REQUIRED TO PAY A FEE OF PER SPACE PER DAY UNTIL THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF SIXTEEN DAYS IS REACHED. I FURTHER MOVE THAT ALL VENDORS OBTAINING A CITY BUSINESS LICENSE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE BE EXEMPT FROM THE PRESENTLY REQUIRED SPACE FEE AND THAT THE SPACE FEE BE APPLIED TO CASUAL SALES AS CITED ABOVE. I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ACTING CITY MANAGER BE DIRECTED AND AUTHORIZED TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY CHANGES IN CHAPTER 8 OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE TO REFLECT THE CHANGES NOTED ABOVE. NOTE BECAUSE OF CITY ZONING REGULATIONS, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO EXEMPT THOSE VENDORS SETTING UP AT AMERICAN PARK AND SWAP FROM ZONING RESTRICTIONS. IN SUCH A CASE, AN ADDITIONAL AMENDEMENT WOULD BE: I FURTHER MOVE THAT ALL VENDORS LOCATING WITHIN THE FENCED AREA OPERATED BY AMERICAN PARK AND SWAP SHALL BE EXEMPTED FROM CITY ZONING REGULATIONS AS THEY CURRENTLY EXIST. ALL OTHER SWAP MEETS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ZONING APPROVAL PRIOR TO OPERATION. ... .... rilt 1 . lA ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET it, NOTES l / , r I i / 6'.1 ) 1)1pllu U to 4'1 /' , , , e , . ' t y , . , 6 ,„ ,r , ? n v ITEM # kp011j MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: ' JS NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ ^ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR ✓ COUNCILMAN BALJO ✓ VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL I COUNCILMAN EIDSON V / MAYOR HILL i UNANI"^, US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL /1k _ ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES \ \ /4 0,..)),,y)/‘1 i c t p xp ITEf1 # c /fi1/4)0MEETING OF ' 119/i'b MOTION BY: 7 SECONDED BY: ' Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO / VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL v COUNCILMAN EIDSON 0 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILMAN JIMENEZ / COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL UNANIm US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL is ITEM NO. 9 Step 1 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 552, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the entire ordinance. ) St 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 552 BY TITLE ONLY. Step 3 I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 552, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE (APPROVED AND ADOPTED/DENIED). OR I MOVE THAT ORDINANCE NO. 552, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: Al Elk Ogibk PUBLIC HEARING 1. FOR _ ORDINANCE NO. 553 2. WILL THE ACTING CITY MANAGER SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM . 3. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? 4. IF NOT, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING CALL FOR A MOTION CALL FOR A SECOND �.► ANY DISCUSSION ROLL CALL VOTE PQACHE ✓ ~ µ ' )e O U n! { z I _., :.err gRiZo‘-,P city o i71acJe unction November 25 , 1986 /'. MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 553 -- AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 3 OF THE CITY CODE ( CITY MANAGER) The City Attorney has indicated that it may be necessary to make certain amendments to the city code regarding the terms and conditions of hiring a city manager if certain provisions are to be made in a contract between the city and a manager applicant . At this point in time , it has not been deter- mined what exactly those amendments would be . In order to meet the deadline for agenda Item submittal and place consideration of such an ordinance on the agenda in accordance with the Open Meeting Law, the item has been listed on the agenda but the text is not available at this time . In the event that a code change is necessary, it will be 'enk.' presented to the council at the Monday work session. kmc 4, Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing .c /0 Old Business New Business Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ROLL LL VOTE SHEET NOTES 70 i c k'i'r / b Alm ak ) 1/26))) ITEM # Io MEETING O 10 f MOTION BY: Cr SECONDED BY: ,ram I r YES NO ABSTAINED . / COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL f COUNCILMAN EIDSON I COUNCILWOMATL GARDNER MAYOR HILL I UNANV1 S IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL iI, i‘P.CHE� 0 �R�zoNP �Dity o� pac�e unction November 25 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER V-1/ SUBJECT: MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW Members of the council indicated at the November 17th work session that there was interest in having a mid-year budget review in order to bring the council up-to-date on the financial status and expenditures of the city. In order for this review to cover a full six months of the city' s budget year, it should be held sometime in January, allowing time for the Finance Department to prepare whatever records the council would like to review. Since a Thursday evening seems to be the most easily avail- able night for the council, you might wish to designate January 15th or 29th as the date for the budget review. The Youth Advisory Board is scheduled to use the council chambers on the remaining Thursday nights . kmc Agenda Approved by 46.- Date Item # Consent Agenda Public H,-ar;ng Old B sir ss New Business a/ - Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 ROLL CA L VOTE SHEET NOTES ift • 61/L ,--/' 4iifjtj ii)1 P, Ny ,, ,,,,, , ' ..... Yi''h `\\' °I/ A /iv . , \-6 -/ // / \1 ol-vie° ITEM # MEETING OF (MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO / VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL / COUNCILMAN EIDSON v/ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER N M IMENEZ , 10( COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR MAYOR HILL / UNANF1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • • • p ITEM NO. 11 I MOVE THAT A MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW BE HELD AT , ON , IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ECHE di_ NO t O , . - z i ZONP it1 o� �ach�e &2unction November 25 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER W SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING The council did not designate a date for the hearing on the General Plan at the November 18th meeting because specific dates for use of school facilities were not available at that time. The council has already designated that a work session on the General Plan be held with staff and representatives of BRW on December 18th and that public comment not be allowed at that time. In order to allow sufficient time for BRW to address any proposed changes from the council , February 5th has been suggested as a date for the actual public hearing. The ,.� auditorium at Four Peaks School has been reserved for that date should the council make that selection. The council needs to designate a hearing date as soon as possible since there are legally required advertising times involved. kmc Agenda Approved by A'C-� Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business ,,�,l / New Business 'j / /L Postponed Item / 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES f'0)\)\CIU A(17)D ITEf1 # 11/ MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR I/ COUNCILMAN BALJO .�. VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL I/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER A MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS ,[ IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 12 I MOVE THAT A GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD ON , AT 7:00 P.M. , AT FOUR PEAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. ,olok Auk OPQ ACHE A�moryp 14,r (� 1 . SIC '1R/ZONP C il� a� paceunction November 25 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF FUNDING ALTERNATIVE TASK FORCE Members of the Council indicated at the November 17th work session that a task force to research alternative methods of financing city projects and essential operations should be formed in order to address the matter as quickly as possible . There was no indication of the actual membership of this task force but I would recommend that it include the City Clerk/Treasurer, Business License Clerk/Revenue Officer, Controller, Economic Development Specialist , members of the Chamber of Commerce who have businesses within the city, a member of the EOAT, a member of the business com- r•• munity who is not a Chamber of Commerce member, at least one consumer/tax payer/city resident , and at least one council representative . I would suggest that council designate two council representatives in the event that one was not available to attend the meetings . This item will be placed on the December 2nd agenda for your consideration . Agenda Approved by -' Date Item # Consent Agenda kmc Public Hearing Old Business �! New Business '%�f46. /3 Pos'pcned item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 mimmOm PROPOSED MOTION - ITEM NO. 13 ALTERNATIVE FUNDING TASK FORCE It has been brought to my attention that the commitee as outlined in the packet memo may be too large a group to be effective in completing the assignment. I concur with this recommendation since a smaller group can easily be organized and can get right to the task. If the Council would like to consider this proposal , the following motion can be offered: I MOVE THAT A SPECIAL AD HOC COMMITEE BE FORMED TO RESEARCH AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COUNCIL ON FUNDING ALTERNATIVES. I FURTHER MOVE THAT THIS AD HOC COMMITTEE CONSIST OF 5 VOTING MEMBERS TO INCLUDE A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, A CITY BUSINESS OWNER WHO IS NOT A CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEMBER, A CITY RESIDENT/CONSUMER, AND A MEMBER OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ACTION TEAM. FURTHER, THAT THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND CITY BUSINESS OWNER POSITIONS NOT NECESSARILY BE CITY RESIDENTS. eat/7/7CW ,xt xbv " £d54 (641 Ih I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE CITY CLERK BE DESIGNATED THE STAFF COORDINATOR FOR THE AD HOC COMMITTEE AND THAT THE FOLLOWING STAFF SERVE IN AN ADVISORY, NON-VOTING CAPACITY: BUSINESS LICENSE CLERK/ , I FURTHER MOVE THAT APPOINTMENTS TO THE AD HOC COMMITTEE BE MADE AT THE „d . DECEMBER 16 COUNCIL MEETING BY MEANS OF TALENT BANK APPLICATIONS OR LETTERS OF INTEREST. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES � � [ ' V) ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: a � Y." YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYI OR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL J COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL C! a ITEM NO. 13 I MOVE THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS BE APPOINTED TO THE FUNDING ALTERNATIVE TASK FORCE: l p,CHE O 4 ti° 4 f 0 '1RIZO NP Vzt O I cipache &unction November 25 , 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER 16/ SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF CITY MANAGER The consultant hired by the city for recruitment of a city manager received 73 applications for the position. Of those 73 applications , the members of the council selected five for final interviews which have since been completed. The selection of a city manager has been placed on the agenda for your consideration at this time in the event the council should wish to take such action. 4....., kmc Agenda Approved by J/ , Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old flu:}IIw•tss New Business /'' ?J 7 Postponed Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 a • EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT CITY MANAGER AGREEMENT made this Z,n.c) day of , 1986, between the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, hereinafter referred to as "Employer" and Bill R. DaVEE of 004gI4 S Arizona, hereinafter referred to as "Employee". 1. In consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, Employer agrees to employ Employee and Employee agrees to work for Employer under the following terms agreed on by the parties hereto. 2 The services to be performed by Employee shall be those of City Manager, as defined by Article 3-1 et. seq. of the City Code of Apache Junction, Arizona. 3 The term of this contract shall commence on C7 , 1989, and shall continue for a period of one (1) )year and six (6) months (eighteen (18) months) thereafter, unless sooner terminated as provided for herein subject to the following qualifications. A) During the term of this contract, Employee shall only be terminated by Employer for cause (i e willful misconduct in office) . B) Employee may give to Employer forty-five (45) calendar days written notice of intention to terminate. This contract shall terminate on the 45th day subsequent to the date of receipt of such written notice 4. Employee further agrees as follows To devote his entire time, skill, labor and attention to said employment during the term of this employment; not to engage in any other business or calling of a permanent nature during the term of employment unless authorized to do so by Employer, and to execute an appropriate oath of office as prescribed by local ordinance or State statute 5 Employer further agrees as follows A) To pay Employee the sum of FOUR THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-THREE DOLLARS AND THIRTY-THREE CENTS ($4,333.33) per month ($52,000 00 annually) payable to Employee on the same payroll schedule as is consistent with other employees of the City of Apache Junction Employee shall be entitled to any cost of living increase which may be awarded to other employees of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, during the term of this contract B) To reimburse Employee for expenses incurred in memberships in professional organizations, professional travel, professional education and similar activities in any amount, however, not to exceed a budget limitation placed on such expenditures commencing fiscal year 1986-87. For fiscal year ending June 30, 1987, such expenditure shall not exceed $2,500.00 PAGE ONE OF TWO • 41 ` . C) To furnish Employee all ordinary benefits normally provided other employees of the City of Apache Junction to include medical and life insurance coverage and participation in the State Retirement program, as well as paid holidays, vacation, sick leave, and compensatory time. D) Employee shall be entitled to use of a city-owned vehicle on a twenty-four (24) hour basis. Said vehicle is not to be used for personal use. ( However, normal travel to and from work shall not be considered personal use E) To contract with ICMA for retirement coverage providing that Employee pays all necessary contributions on any coverage provided thereunder, and that such contributions be deducted from Employee's pay as a payroll deduction 6. This contract shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Arizona. 7 This contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed on by the parties hereto; and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract shall be deemed to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. EMPLOYER. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION BY NORMAN S. HILL, MAYOR BILL . DaVEE, EMPLOYEE PAGE TWO OF Th0 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES v ITEM II MEETING OF 00 MOT I ON BY: $iyt SECONDED BY:101."1-' YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER VAAAONNElfts COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR ✓ COUNCILMAN BALJO / VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ✓/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANI!'" US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 14 ,( I MOVE THAT �• V BE APPOINTED CITY MANAGER, EFFECTIVE APPROXIMATELY 45 DA AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT6C , I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE SALARY BE ESTABLISHED A Vv) PER YEAR AND THAT THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT BE APPROVED AS PRE ENTED. O� PQACHEjo C� U ,,Ai,,..y E, r ii► z \\........... y '"IRIZONN V itt' on vac. e unction DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT November 21, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY MANAGER V THROUGH: iltICHUCK NEWCOMER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FROM: ,pkJULIE REID, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - DECEMBER 2, 1986 EXPIRATION OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PZ-20-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 120) PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project was to have been a twelve lot, five acre mobile home subdivision by planned development. It was to be located on the northeast corner of N. Ironwood Drive and W. Smoketree Street. STAFF COMMENTS „r At the time the owner of the property wanted to develop a small mobile home subdivision, the 100 year assured water supply issue had effectively halted all construction of subdivisions. In an effort to aid the developer, a planned development process was recommended which would have allowed con- struction to proceed and allowed the lots to be rented until the water supply issue was resolved. The zoning ordinance at that time did not allow con- struction of "rental units" with less than ten acres (10) . Because of the owner's poor health, the planned development was never con- structed. Since that time the water issue has been resolved and a subdivision could be constructed. Additionally, there are several mobile home classi- fications other than "TH" - Trailer Homesite now. We have discussed these classifications with the owner. The attached letter is the result of these discussions. Agenda Approved by �-� Date Item #" Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business 1 "7�7 ' /`; Postpnnj Item 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 Honorable Mayor and CyAy Council - Agenda Item - Decem 2, 1986 - Page Two According to Section 19.0111, Article 19 of the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Ordinance, a planned Development shall be reviewed within one year after the approval of the preliminary plan. The effect of this review is: 1. The zoning reverts back to to the previous base zone, or 2. The zoning reverts to any other appropriate designation (determined by City Council ) , or 3. If applicant demonstrates good cause necessitating an extension which would serve the public interest, the City Council may grant an extension of time not to exceed one year. (Update of final plans and improvement plans to current City standards required. ) The owner has requested that the zoning revert to CR-2 (MH) and the staff concurs. The original zoning classification was General Rural GR. RECOMMENDED MOTION "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junciton, Arizona, that the planned development approval for rezoning case PZ-20-81 (Ordinance No. 120) has expired and therefore shall be reverted to the zoning classification of , this classification being deemed an appro- priate designation for the subject site." JAR:CRN:j1 • c r t.Srl ??0. ... c, • 6 ',I 1 I\ ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET 51 "DOTES / ,1;/ )y) d' ) c.iii‘ ... ?1/7 ; 1 / Vd 01 ITEM # I4 MEETING OF flOP P1OTIOrd BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON 11111111111111 COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MEM 0.% ► A LA -'a �'iI COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR EMI COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MEM MAYOR HILL UNANI""OU IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL a a a ITEM NO. 15 I MOVE THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR REZONING CASE PZ-20-81 (ORDINANCE NO. 120) HAS EXPIRED 5.ND THEREFORE SHALL BE REVERTED TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C t- 1 THIS CLASSIFICATION BEING DEEMED AN APPROPRIATE DESIGNAT ION FOR HE SUBJECT SITE. PQp,CHE Gti 0 ;' 0 ` w dqR/ZON " cOity o c puche 2unction November 25, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: THE ACTING CITY MANAGER" FROM: `, THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID -- PROSPECTOR PARK CONCESSION Bids were opened on November 13, at 10:00 a.m. for the operation of the concession building at Prospector Park. The following two bids were received for this service: C.B. Concession 12 percent Country Deli/Classic Caterers 11 percent The percentage amount indicates that portion of monthly gross sales that will be paid to the City. Based on the following information staff is recommending that Country Deli/Classic Caterers be awarded this bid: 1. C.B. Concession' s bid proposal was not complete. No background .�. information or references were provided to insure this firm is qualified for this service. 2. C.B. Concession's proposal was subject to acceptance within five days of opening. This is not a reasonable amount of time to allow for proper review of proposals and acceptance by the City Council . 3. Country Deli/Classic Caterers did provide all required infor- mation. 4. Country Deli/Classic Caterers are currently under contract to pro- vide food service to four agencies in the Valley. These agencies have all been contacted and have indicated excellent service by Country Deli/Classic Caterers. Agenda Approved by Date Item # Your consideration of this recommendation is appreciated. Consent Agenda JB/jtl Public Hearing Old Business �/ / New Business 'J'/ / Postponed ltgrn 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 , PA .L CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 OVytik)/11))6‘ ITEM # ( (P 1 MEETING OF lj 9//"'P MOTION BY: Lii\kVUL SECONDED BY: /5- YES/ NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL `. COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER I 61 COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR V COUNCILMAN BALJO V MAYOR HILL j UNANIfMOU , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 16 I MOVE THAT THE BID FOR PROSPECTOR PARK CONCESSION LEASE BE AWARDED TO O� PQACHFiG2 n v' 1 J „o s, „Z '9RIZONP `fit o C ac/ae 0 unction November 24, 1986 ^� TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER IL t FROM: CONTROLLER ja- SUBJECT. S/36 AND OPERATING SYSTEM PROGRAM FINANCING At the November 18, 1986 Council meeting, the Council gave approval to purchase a S/36 and related programs. As discussed with the Council about a month ago when I first brought up the purchase of a S/36, it would be necessary to finance the purchase of the S/36. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes Leasing, Inc. will finance the S/36 ($45,363.61) and also the operating software ($5,580.00) at a rate of 9.0% per annum for a period of five (5) years. A breakdown of the expenses follows: S/36 $45,363.61 Operating System Software 5,580.00 Anna. Total to Finance $50,943.61 Total Lease Payments (60) 62,978.04 Total Interest Paid $12,034.43 We are able to pay off the Lease Purchase Agreement at any time without any penalty. Attached are the necessary papers that need to be signed by the City Clerk and City Attorney. If there are any questions, please call me. JKL/ls Agenda Approved by //—' Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business � New Business 7 �"7/'i.c' Postponed Item _______ 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ars!nnIr RESOLUTION NO 86-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ENTERING INTO A LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR AQUISITION OF THE USE AND POSSESSION OF AN IBM SYSTEM 36 COMPUTER SYSTEM . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: /t WHEREAS, that this City enter into a Lease Purchase Agreement, dated 1 as of the 19th day of December, 1986, in the form presented to this meeting, for acquisition of the use and possession of an IBM System 36 Computer System described therein for an aggregate cost (including return on investment at the rate of 9.0% per annum) of $62,978 04, payable over a period of five (5) years in accordance with the terms of such Agreement, subject to the right of the City to terminate and cancel such Agreement and the City's obligations thereunder on each June 19th during the term of the Agreement and subject to the right of the City to acquire such computer system at such times and on such terms as set forth in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, that the appropriate officers of the City are authorized, empowered and directed to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary or appropriate to consummate the above described transaction and to perform fully and timely all of the City's agreements and obligations in connection therewith. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1986 SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 1986. IL NORMAN S HILL Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. DAVID F. ALEXANDER City Attorney EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Description One (1) IBM System 36 computer system, consisting of the following: Equipment: 5360-B24 256K Magazine 400MB with Stage II Processor 1007 512K Additional Memory 1006 Additional Storage 256K 4900 Work Station Control Expansion Operating System Programs: 5727-SSP S/36 System Support Program 5727-RGP S/36 RPGII 5727-UTI S/36 Utilities 5799-BRJ Programmer & Operator Product 5727-QUI Query/36 Original Purchase Price: $50,943.61 3-80-407a Rev A . EXHIBIT B CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE 4 YEARS & 11 MONTHS @ 9.000% INTEREST PAYMENT PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL REMAINING OPTION TO PURCHASE DATES PAYMENTS @ 9.000% PAYMENTS PRINCIPAL STIPULATED LOSS VALUE* /rmik 12-19-86 1,049.63 1,049 63 49,893.98 01-19-87 675.43 374 20 1,049 63 49,218.55 02-19-87 680 49 369 14 1,049 63 48,538.06 03-19-87 685 59 364.04 1,049.63 47,852.47 04-19-87 690.74 358.89 1,049.63 47,161.73 05-19-87 695.92 353 71 1,049 63 46,465.81 06-19-87 701.14 348.49 1,049.63 45,764.67 45,764.67 07-19-87 706.39 343.24 1,049.63 45,058.28 08-19-87 711.69 337.94 1,049.63 44,346.59 09-19-87 717.03 332.60 1,049.63 43,629.56 10-19-87 722.41 327.22 1,049.63 42,907.15 11-19-87 727.83 321.80 1,049.63 42,179.32 12-19-87 733.29 316.34 1,049.63 41,446.03 01-19-88 738.78 310.85 1,049 63 40,707.25 02-19-88 744.33 305.30 1,049.63 39,962.92 03-19-88 749 91 299 72 1,049.63 39,213.01 04-19-88 755.53 294.10 1,049.63 38,457.48 05-19-88 761.20 288.43 1,049.63 37,696 28 06-19-88 766.91 282.72 1,049 63 36,929.37 36,929 37 07-19-88 772.66 276.97 1,049.63 36,156.71 08-19-88 778.45 271.18 1,049 63 35,378.26 09-19-88 784.29 265 34 1,049.63 34,593.97 10-19-88 790.18 259.45 1,049.63 33,803.79 11-19-88 796.10 253.53 1,049 63 33,007 69 12-19-88 802.07 247 56 1,049.63 32,205.62 01-19-89 808 09 241.54 1,049.63 31,397.53 02-19-89 814.15 235.4E 1,049 63 30,583.38 03-19-89 820.25 229.38 1,049 63 29,763.13 04-19-89 826 41 223 22 1,049.63 28,936.72 05-19-89 832.60 217.03 1,049.63 28,104.12 06-19-89 838.85 210.78 1,049.63 27,265.27 27,265.27 07-19-89 845.14 204.49 1,049.63 26,420.13 08-19-89 851 48 198 15 1,049.63 25,568.65 "ink09-19-89 857.87 191 76 1,049.63 24,710.78 10-19-89 864.30 185 33 1,049.63 23,846.48 11-19-89 870 78 178.85 1,049.63 22,975.70 12-19-89 877.31 172.32 1,049 63 22,098.39 01-19-90 883.89 165 74 1,049 63 21,214.50 02-19-90 890 52 159.11 1,049.63 20,323.98 03-19-90 897.20 152.43 1,049.63 19,426.78 04-19-90 903.93 145.70 1,049.63 18,522.85 05-19-90 910.71 138.92 1,049.63 17,612.14 06-19-90 917.54 132.09 1,049.63 16,694.60 16,694 60 07-19-90 924.42 125.21 1,049.63 15,770.18 08-19-90 931.35 118 28 1,049 63 14,838.83 09-19-90 938 34 111 29 1,049 63 13,900.49 10-19-90. 945.38 104.25 1,049.63 12,955 11 11-19-90 952.47 97.16 1,049.63 12,002.64 12-19-90 959 61 90.02 1,049 63 11,043.03 01-19-91 966.81 82.82 1,049.63 10,076.22 02-19-91 974 06 75 57 1,049.63 9,102.16 03-19-91 981 36 68 27 1,049.63 8,120.80 04-19-91 988 72 60 91 1,049 63 7,132.08 05-19-91 996.14 53.49 1,049.63 6,135.94 06-19-91 1,003.61 46.02 1,049.63 5,132.33 5,132.33 07-19-91 1,011 14 38.49 1,049.63 4,121.19 08-19-91 1,018 72 30 91 1,049 63 3,102 47 09-19-91 1,026.36 23 27 1,049 63 2,076 11 10-19-91 1,034.06 15.57 1,049.63 1,042.05 11-19-91 1,042.05 7.82 1,049.87 .00 TOTALS 50,943.61 12,034.43 62,978.04 *AFTER PAYMENT OF AMOUNT OTHERWISE DUE ON DATE INDICATED ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (D vt 0/14 OP. I ITEM # MEETING OF Any/ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER IEZ COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR ✓] MAYOR HILL UNANI"1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 17 I MOVE THAT RESOLUTION NO. 86-44, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ENTERING INTO A LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR AQUISITION OF THE USE AND POSSESSION OF AN IBM SYSTEM 36 COMPUTER SYSTEM, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. (cip._CHs ✓Gti U ,' trrw` z q,QiZpNP (6'ity 04ache cOunction TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER 'l FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS '',\ REGARDING: BROADWAY — MERIDIAN INTERSECTION (REGULAR AGENDA ITEM — DECEMBER 2, 1986) Due to intersection improvements in conjunction with an intergovernmental agreement with Maricopa County and concerns for safety of pedestrians and motorists predicated upon the present volume of traffic and future increases; it is the consensus of staff that a vertical curb with specific driveway approaches is required for this project, in accordance with current provisions of the City's Development Guide, for public safety purposes. This item will be discussed at the December 1st study session, where— after the attached motion is provided for your consideration. Agenda Approved by Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business New Business %?/ i s Postponed Item RWB:th file # 302. 53 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHE .IN NOTES te / , 9 /4 /e ....... t ,,d V 1)1 dikV 1 f r4 }/()j \ i) 06 4 1 Cti \9' a ITEM # % MEETI►dG OF g(1 , I MOTION BY: ILA SECONDED BY; 67101 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO ✓ VC / '.' VICE MAYOR BA KKEDAHL COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER , i / , MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL •", 011S **Ail • (40 A ITEM NO. 18 I MOVE THAT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTION OF BROADWAY AND MERIDIAN ROADS ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY' S DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, WHICH REQUIRES 6" VERTICAL CURBS ON SECTION LINE ROADWAYS, BE CONFIRMED. ,......, .k.,:....,,,.._4.t ,-6 V c ,,., 0 b o Ik' z .tRizoNP cOity o cipache unction November 19, 1986 Agenda Approved by ,re `" -- Date Item a "Ir. Consent Agenda MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCItleanng Old Business _—, -- , THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER 0,J ���a` / New Business � � �` 4—t FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1tJ Postponed Item SUBJECT: SUPERSTITION FREEWAY — LANDSCAPING (Agenda Item) The designs for landscaping has been initiated for the Superstition Freeway and alternative themes are being considered: 1) — Over—seeding (shrubs and grasses) — Transplanting existing trees — Long—term germination and growth — Potential dust problem — Minimal visual impact 2) — Transplanting existing trees — Install container—type plants — Use over—seeding for ground cover — Native plant materials to be drought—tolerant — Install emitter—type irrigation system " 3) — Essentially alternative 2 with the addition of major placement of granite — Minimal ground cover by over—seeding — Native plant materials to be supplemented with container trees and shrubs — Maximum visual impact In order to provide input to ADOT, consideration and selection of one of these alternatives should be considered. If alternative 2 or 3 is selected as the City's choice, it will be necessary to enter into a landscape maintenance agreement similar to the attached agreement which would require the City to furnish and install water services as well as provide water for landscape installation during construction, and landscape maintenance thereafter. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ARIZONA PROJECT F-028-1 (26) SUPERSTITION FREEWAY ^. (Gilbert Road to Val Vista Drive) THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 19 , pursuant to A.R.S. Sec . 11-951—through Sec. 11-954 , by and between the Department of Transportation, Highways Division, an agency of the State of Arizona , thereunto duly authorized , hereinafter designated Department of Transportation and the City of Mesa , a municipal corporation , thereunto duly authorized , hereinafter designated as City. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is to the mutual advantage of the Department of Transportation and the City to landscape certain areas within the right-of-way on the Superstition Freeway from Gilbert Road median centerline roadway station 549+50 to Val Vista Drive median centerline roadway station c54+50, a net distance of approximately 1.99 miles . mOW THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually agreed by and between the Department of Transportation and the City, pursuant to the authority contained in A.R.S. Sec . 28-108 as follows : 1 . The Department of Transportation will prepare plans for .sm., the landscaping and irrigation project and submit them to the Federal Highway Administration for approval . O . Upon approval , the project will be constructed by the Department of Transportation using State funds and federal funds apportioned to the State of Arizona . 3. The City shall furnish and install necessary water services from existing water mains to the designated locations within the right-of-way from Gilbert Road median centerline roadway station 549+50 to Val Vista Drive median centerline roadway station 654+60 , all at Department of Transportation expense . 4 . The City shall furnish all water for landscape installation during construction phase , and all water hereafter necessary to properly maintain the landscape between the right-of-way lines from Gilbert Road median centerline roadway station 549+50 to Val Vista Drive median centerline roadway station 654+60, all at City expense . 5. The Department of Transportation shall maintain the landscaping and irrigation system within the right-of-way from Gilbert Road median centerline roadway station 549+50 to Val Vista Drive median centerline roadway station 654+f0. ' . The Department of Transportation shall furnish all electrical power necessary to maintain the landscaping within the right-of-way from Gilbert Road median centerline roadway station 549+50 to Val Vista Drive median centerline roadway station 654+60 . 7. The City hereby agrees to save and hold harmless the Department of Transportation, or any of its departments , agencies , officers or employees from all cost and damage incurred by any of the above and from any other damage to any person or property whatsoever , which is caused by an activity, condition, or event arising out of the performance or non-performance of any provision of this agreement by the City, any of its agents, or any of its independent contractors. The above cost incurred by the Department of Transportation or any of its departments , agencies or employees shall include in the event of an action , court costs , expenses of litigation and reasonable attorneys' fees. In the event that a claim or suit is filed against the City and the Department of Transportation, then the City agrees to reimburse the Department of Transportation to the extent that the City' s activities contributed to the loss . 8. This agreement shall be filed with the Secretary of State and shall become effective on the date of such filing. 9. Attached hereto are resolutions of the Department of Transportation and the City authorizing both entities to enter into this agreement , and a written determination by the City Attorney of Mesa that this agreement is in proper form and within the powers and authority granted to the City under the laws of this State . 10 . The effective date of this agreement shall be upon filing with the Secretary of State and shall remain in full force and effect for a period of five (5) years from the effective date unless terminated earlier by mutual consent of the parties hereto or unless this agreement violates any Arizona law, rule or regulation, either now enacted or which may be enacted in the future . This agreement will be automatically renewed for successive periods of five ( 5) years unless the parties hereto mutually agree by formal amendment reflected - 2 - herein to this agreement not less than one (1) month prior to the initial or renewed expiration date . 11 . All parties are hereby put on notice that this Contract (Agreement) is subject to cancellation by the Governor , pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 3R-511 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed two copies of this agreement on the day and year herein written. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF MESA, a municipal corporation By - —14/---T---- By u State F]ngineer City Manager — 3 — STATE OF ARIZONA SS County of Maricopa ) of the City of Mesa , Arizona , do hereby certify that the following is a true and correct extract of the minutes of the City Council meeting held In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Mesa , Arizona. none in Mesa , Arizona this day of , 1986. — 4 — APPROVAL OF THE CITY ATTORNEY T hereby state that I have reviewed the proposed intergovernmental agreement , between the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HIGHWAYS DIVISION, STATE ENGINEER and the CITY OF MESA and declare this agreement to be in proper form and within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona . DATED this day of , 1986. A J. LAMAR SHELLEY The City Attorney p — 9 — APPROVAL OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 06111., I hereby state that I have reviewed the proposed intergovernmental agreement , between the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HIGHWAYS DIVISION, STATE ENGINEER and the CITY OF MESA and declare this agreement to be in proper form and within the powers and authority granted under the laws of the State of Arizona . DATED THIS day of , 1986. • ROBERT K. CORBIN The Attorney General Assistant Attorney General — 6 — RESOLUTION Be it resolved on this date, September 8, 1986 , I, CHARLES L. MILLER, the below undersigned Director , Department of Transportation, have determined that it is to be to the advantage of the State of Arizona that the Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Highways Division , and the CITY OF MESA, acting by and through its CITY COUNCIL enter into the intergovernmental agency agreement for the purpose of entering in a landscape maintenance agreement for certain projects which have been selected by the State and subject to the approval of the City of Mesa as by law required; and request the City to perform certain work and supply necessary materials required to maintain the specified areas in the manner specified in the attached agreement. CHARLES L. MILLER, Director Department of Transportation — 7 — ROLL CALL" : ' ET ' I NOTES 11‘)/ I / il I' , 11111?°'t ''► i 1 1)PC)j) \' 1://;_jiris)11) 1 'i it, 1 Yi S ITEM # A MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED B tlA t.iii00 . YES NO ABSTAINED til , COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR .0... if COUNCILMAN BALJO ✓ , VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL _ / COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER MAYOR HILL . UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL4 ITEM NO. 18a I MOVE THAT ALTERNATIVE (1 , 2, OR 3) , BE RECOMMENDED TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE LANDSCAPE THEME OF THE SUPERSTITION FREEWAY; AND THAT (IF ALTERNATIVE 2 OR 3 IS SELECTED) , THAT STAFF IS AUTHORIZED TO COORDINATE WITH PINAL COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY AND THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO DEVELOP APPROPRIATE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING WHEREUPON THE CITY COUNCIL 'S REVIEW, FURTHER ACTION WILL BE CONSIDERED. Al\ Auk Z Zpli\CHE 4.(i '� 3 is \ izoV" V it/ 4 c pac/ie &2unction .0. NOVEMBER 24, 1986 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER / FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING: SEWER AND WATER ANALYSIS (REGULAR AGENDA ITEM — DECEMBER 2, 1986) With presentations at the November 17th study session, it was suggested that analysis be made of the various sewer and water options, so that the best approach for the City could be based upon knowledge of benefits and consequences as well as economic considerations. In these regards, attached is information that outlines the components of the proposal (Exhibit "A") and calendar of events (Exhibit "B"). Should the Council wish to proceed along these lines, a motion is provided for your consideration. Agenda Approved by /6! Date Item # Consent Agenda Public Hearing Old Business RWB:th New Business 4 /% Postponed Item file # 311 .00-312.00 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 A ATTACHMENT "A" City of Apache Junction Water Company Acquisition/Construction of Sewerage Facilities COMPONENTS OF THE PROPOSAL GENERAL The City of Apache Junction will be accepting proposals to develop a structured approach for evaluating various options and alternatives to acquire private water companies and/or develop sewerage facilities. BACKGROUND Prior studies and reports as listed below are to be used in the assess— ment process: SEWER 1 ) Sewage Disposal Alternatives May 1981 2) CAAG 208 Plan Amendment October 1983 3) Sewer Study May 1986 4) Sewage Issue Update per Council Study Session October 13, 1986 WATER 1 ) Water Systems Evaluations May 1981 2) Preliminary Investigations into City Acquisition of Water Systems April 22, 1983 3) Preliminary Opinion of Fair Market Value of Private Water Companies December 30, 1983 4) Water Quality Analysis/Monitoring Study April 1986 5) Arizona Water Company Presentation October 1986 6) Water Issue Update per Council Study Session October 1986 OTHER MATERIAL 1 ) Population Analysis October 24, 1980 2) Draft General Plan October 1986 3) Apache Junction Growth Conference Consensus October 12-14, 1986 4) Bonding Capacity Summary RESULTS DESIRED Sewerage has been listed as the primary concern, and the development of a sewage system is paramount; however, if financial options will allow the City to also acquire private water companies, it would prefer to do so simultaneously. Aft, Aft, ATTACHMENT "A (continued) SEWER OPTIONS (Phased construction) 1 ) City owned/operated collection and treatment facilities. 2) City owned collection system — treatment by City of Mesa. 3) Privatized collection and treatment facilities. WATER COMPANY OPTIONS 1 ) Acquire Palm Springs Water Company and contract with Arizona Water Company for operation and maintenance. 2) Acquire Palm Springs and Arizona Water Company with operation and maintenance by the City. FINANCING OPTIONS 1 ) *Conventional bonding (General obligation/Revenue bonds). 2) Improvement Districts. 3) Arizona Municipal Financing 4) E.P.A. Construction Grants. 5) CDBG — HUD — FhMA — other. 6) Industrial Development Bonds. 7) Lease/purchase. 8) Privatization. *Note as of September 1986, the City's General Obligation Bonding Capacity is: 20% of Secondary 6% of Secondary Assessed Valuation Assessed Valuation Limitation $9, 945,869 $2,983, 760 Outstanding NONE NONE Capacity $9,945,869 $2,983,760 ATTACHMENT "A" (continued) KEY QUESTIONS 1 ) How much would each sewer and water option cost? a) Use sewer cost estimates in May 1986 study. b) Update acquisition costs in April 1983 study. 2) What annual costs would be incurred for operation and maintenance for each option? 3) What costs would be incurred for staffing and capitol outlay? 4) What combination of financial options would allow the development of a sewage system and acquisition of both water companies? 5) Considering the City's current bonding capacity, is there a clear—cut eco— nomic advantage to privatization considering the effects of current tax reform? 6) Is there interest in the private sector for the privatization of sewage faci— lities? 7) What are the short—term/long—term benefits and drawbacks of each water and sewer option? 8) How would economic and financial options impact Apache Junction? 9) To what extent could City acquisition of both private water companies create water rate parity, and how would water tax revenue losses be offset? 10) Could water rates be reduced or stabilized with City ownership? 11 ) Could a portion of water revenues legally be used to develop the sewer system? 12) How much would residents be expected to pay for water and sewer service? 13) What benefit or drawback can be placed upon the following factors to create a value index? a) Control of utilities. b) Availability of funds for other purposes. c) Financial impact (loss of revenue) of water companies. d) Quality of service. e) Control of growth. f) Attraction of development (residential—commercial—industrial ). g) Fire protection. h) Public health. i ) Long—term water/sewer rates. j) Consolidation of operation/maintenance. k) Time constraints for implementaion. 1 ) Public Vs private ownership/leasing. ATTACHMENT "A (continued) 14) What other issues should be examined which would impact the decisions to be made? 15) What is the best approach for Apache Junction? ASSIGNMENT Design a structured approach to answer key questions in order to assist the City in making the final decision to proceed with water company acquisitions and/or construction of sewerage facilities? A) Methodology: 1 ) Generally describe your firm's approach to the short and long—range implications of the projects. 2) Include how ideas are generated and exchanged in your firm and how decisions are made. 3) Describe how you have handled similar studies in the past. 4) Describe how you propose to obtain public input; coordinate with other agencies; and provide interim reports to the Council in preparing the report. B) WORK PROGRAM Submit a work program in tabular, graph or map form identifying the time schedule and work tasks to be completed. B) PROJECT BUDGET/PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE: 1 ) Submit a preliminary outline within the maximum ceiling bud— geted for these projects to include labor costs by task and hours and to include estimated expenses. This budget may ""' be revised when the final scope of work is agreed upon (remem— ber the City has budgeted $20,000 for the study). 2) Submit a performance schedule identifying the dates the pro— ducts can be expected to be ready and the dates when certain processes and events (such as public hearings and meetings) can be expected to occur. Aft. Aft. ATTACHMENT "A" (continued) EXAMPLE MILESTONE CHART March 3 Mar 4—Apr 5 April 6 Apr 7—May 4 May 5 Council Analyze & Work/Study Finalize Formally submit Award of Evaluate Presentation Evaluation Final Report Contract Data to City Council Executive Summary Presentation to City Council -* Indicates weekly progress review with City Staff, BASIC CONSULTANT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following responses should be made in the Final Summary Report in addition to other findings deemed pertinent: BASIC CONSULTANT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 ) The City's best option for construction of sewage facilities is because 2) The City (can or cannot) acquire both private water companies because 3) In pursuing water company acquisition and sewerage facilities construc— tion, the City's financial condition for pursuing other projects will be 4) To proceed with , the City must rink 7 ATTACHMENT "B" /01V i �/ Calindor of Events 0./r/ �/I� 0)/ ' Ill DEC. 2 jr:;V))1,Council authorizes release of requests for interest & proposals ` DEC. 5 /Letters of interest distributed, f'#) afi)) , posted and advertised DEC. 19 Letters of interest & statements VI 0 of qualifications received DEC. 24 Applicants (12) notified to submit proposals JAN. 19 Proposals submitted JAN. 27 Applicants (6) short listed, ranked & notified FEB. 10 Applicants (3) scheduled for presentations & interviews FEB. 11 Applicants are ranked & notified FEB. 16 Prepare final scope of work & negotiate fee with applicant #1 , if agreement can not be reached, continue process with applicant #2, etc. MAR. 3 Submit contract to City Council for approval Aft, MAR. 5 Authorize work MAY 5 Complete work final report & recommendations made to City Council ROLL CALL ,VOTE SHEET NOTES 1, 1 � i)pt ITEP1 # IC\ MEETING OF v (1°' "16 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR V COUNCILMAN BALJO V VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL I COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR HILL UNANIIO S IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 19 I MOVE THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE ACTING CITY MANAGER, TO INITIATE THE i PROCESS TO SELECT A FIRM TO ASSIST THE CITY IN DEVELOPING A �C 6� wurrOly ANALYSIS OF SEWER AND WATER ISSUES;$ `tD VTAPTtb (.4Sfi G"(C . D AT UT RI Z ON T A G A CO L R S. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES _ V \ 1) J 4/ ITEM # MEETING F r v MOTION BY: Ai\VIX/ SECONDED BY: Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER kKIJAC-NecA 7r /J. COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL MAYOR HILL UNANI"^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL a ITEM NO. 20 I MOVE THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M. , AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. , ON DECEMBER 15, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M. , ON DECEMBER 16, 1986, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES fit; � 6 1 O,. G\44 111 vdlikis ITEM # MEETING F MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:r-P-)31 YES I NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR BAKKEDAHL < i . COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER COUNCILWOMAN TAYLOR COUNCILMAN BALJO MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Amok ITEM NO. 22 I MOVE THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P.M. r. Oak ROLL CALL 1 ,11/11 kl ig/)# ROLL CALL IPRESrNT ( ABSENT F 4... a./ / w.s. ( -,_) MAYOR HILL I VICE—MAYOR BAKKEDAHL ! / ✓ _ 1 I COUNC I LLOMAN TAYLOR ✓ /____� 1 I I COUNCILWOMAN GARDNER '` , ✓/ COUNCILMAN BAL�Q ! �� ✓ I COUNCILMAN EIDSON I TOTAL I U2 0 I STAFF PRESENT I11,1" P r+ CITY MANAGER MCN11LTY CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly 1 v / r Vz FINANCE CONTROLLER Keith Lewis t, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Chuck Newcomer DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY Bill McDaniel ✓ • I/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch KoLi Otta, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST John Schoe h If/ v //:-/ SUP ERINTENDENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Jeff ell DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY Pam Loui I awl? Aft. Amk REGULAR WORK SESSION OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1001 N. IDAHO ROAD, APACHE JUNCTION, AZ MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1986, 7.00 P M TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1986, 6.00 P M (if necessary) AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2 Roll Call 3. Presentation by Tudor Engineering on Superstition Freeway Landscaping Alternatives (Public Works) 4. Discussion on items for December 2nd regular agenda 5. Discussion on Route 88 traffic controls (Public Works) 6 Discussion on U.S. 60 median crossovers (Public Works) 7. Discussion on helipad lighting and fencing (Public Works) 8. Discussion on funding for street improvements (Public Works) 9 Discussion on Ironwood drainage alternatives (Public Works) 10. Discussion on 5-year street improvement plan (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 11. Discussion on lot split ordinance (Vice Mayor Bakkedahl) 12 Calendar reports 13. Requests for future agenda items 14 Reminder of scheduled Executive Session 15. Adjournment /mb. Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the City Clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, AZ, Monday through Friday, 8.00 a m to 5.00 p m , excluding holidays Dated tt�his 25th//`�,day of November, 1986 ed�// Kathleen Connelly, Cityrk /\ /\ P- p,CHYFM✓G'L . ../ '•+'4.,- '4,'''' ..... UI ( Z ,: "9P P 2/2, �'J ��:���C ZE 4 'L�32C�20?Z lZON NOTICE OF EXECUTIVE SESSION __AaMb. AGENDA Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 38-431 .02, notice is hereby given that the Apache Junction City Council will hold an executive Session on Monday. Dec . 1 1986 and Tuesday,Dec . 21 986at 6 : 00 P.M. , at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex, 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, to consider the following. 1 . Discussion or consideration of employment, assignment, appointment, pro- motion, demotion, dismissal , salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee or employee of any public body, except that, with the exception of salary discussions,an officer, appointee or employee may demand that such discussion or consideration occur at a public meeting. The public body shall provide the officer, appointee or employee with such notice of the executive session as is appropriate, but not less that 24 hours for the officer, appointee or employee to determine whether such discussion or consideration shall occur at a public meeting. ( City manager recruitment and contract terms ; appointment to council vacancy) 2. Discussion or consideration of records exempt by law from public inspection. 3. Discussion or consultation for legal advice with the city attorney. 4. Discussion or consultation with the city attorneys in order to consider its position and instruct its attorneys regarding the city's position in pending or contemplated litigation. 5. Discussions or consultations with designated representatives of the city in .0. order to consider its position and instruct its representatives regarding negotiations with employee organizations regarding the salaries, salary schedules or compensation paid in the form of fringe benefits of employees. 6. Discussion, consultation or consideration for the purpose of international or interstate negotiations. 7. Discussion or consultation with designated representatives of the city in order to consider its position and instruct its representatives regarding negotiations for the purchase or lease of real property. Copies of this agenda and additional information regarding any of the items listed above may be obtained from the City Clerk's office, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, AZ, Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P M. , excluding holidays . Dated this 25th day of November, 1986 . L-Zt.7i./%.'. A-- 6-7/��, Kathleen Connelly, City,9lerk 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 35220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 r PCHE✓G 20 U� j; hp z \R/ZONP 62ty et &4pache cOunction November 21, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER0/ r`` FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS '` + i SUBJECT: US60/SR88 MEDIAN CROSSOVER (Study Session Agenda Item) At the request of Council, a meeting was held with the Department of Trans— portation Traffic Engineer to discuss the State's policy for median cross— overs. Attached you will find a copy of their policy, guidelines and procedures referencing the location of medians from intersections, and in relation to traffic volumes. Due to the geometry of the reconstructed intersection of US60/SR88 and it's slotted left—turn lanes, these policies may not specifically address the current situation. In reviewing the area westerly of the intersection, in my opinion it may a be possible to install a median opening opposite the main entry to Super— stition Plaza; however, it would require an engineering study and approval by the State. Normally, these types of projects are initiated and financed by the developer or businessmen in the vicinity. The current budget did not anticipate studies or median construction; therefore, if the Council wishes the City to pursue the construction of median crossovers, considera— tion should be given in the upcoming budget as it has recently been deter— mined that with the City 2¢ sales tax being eliminated, funds for roadway construction may be drastically reduced. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-8002 November 21, 1986 Page Two As the City approves many projects, resolutions and ordinances, it may sometimes be difficult to recall reviewing all of the information, especially when considerable time has elapsed; however, the information to obliterate and eliminate the median crossovers was provided and acted upon by the City Council . Attached are various documents retrieved from the file. 1 ) On May 14, 1985, copies of the Initial Design Concept Report were pro— vided to Council members who formally approved the design concept on May 21, 1985. 2) On January 16, 1986, the Environmental Assessment Report was provided to the Council for review and comment. Excerpts from the Report attached hereto, included: a) A map indicating pavement obliteration including the referenced median crossings. b) Page 3 verbally refers to the removal of the medians as a necessary safety enhancement. c) A copy of a letter from ADOT to Mr. Arthur Grandlich referencing coordination in these regards. RWB:sh attach: Agenda item with Council approval Excerpt from Environmental Assessment Report a) Map b) Page 3 c) Grandlich letter from ADOT ADOT Policy Statement File 100.051 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION \-() : 1� REQUEST TO SPEAK b NAME `\` rAN v`t F C e DATE: 12 2 Y3 6 ADDRESS: t 0 i 9 ` 1)C, L F, AGENDA ITEM: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: ` O WN AWN 1 d v‘o DATE: 2t Dec 8b ADDRESS: g2,2 E • LVi;h1 `` AGENDA ITEM: \\\OYWN �s.s Go � th H 110 T � C WIN/ a� 5a1ti ard 1 COWN 1:0 ' "i 1N7Aj)1V )115 D��. t- w,s L\A4. Vv14.1 r1 DC' VkAt 1p3 'r1, �` tl j o_st-1 I ��11 ah,\ I. very Cbiiccrne A , �. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: J �ti/ -�-S T'/ DATE: ADDRESS: . AGENDA ITEM: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: '? / (id 5 a Al DATE: //- ADDRESS: 08' 1 l " At), AGENDA ITEM: li fili, l 0 71`(E / - t 4 )c-- CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: j L\A/tily ) CI O h/ DATE: ) - -c ADDRESS: AGENDA ITEM: CALJ y-o rj n Pt" 9 I i f. oak CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: =J DA E: ADDRESS: `j • � .lo�,, 4, AGENDA ITEM: C_['_t�p S\ .v.) 4-Th (,W Q Cjare R 3 Ais CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: / l i k i." <���5e/'1 41-'✓ DATE: / (19(p ADDRESS: g(23 /% -� - AGENDA ITEM: - 7 o fe' CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: Xa4ya-14"? DATE: Q� ,� I)g6 ADDRESS: 90 4/4 !o �,(4,, '/? , /S� AGENDA ITEM: / 5"5.01 it .� CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK �� NAME: AtO �///��/�il� i DATE: [,(,, 7 g ADDRESS: / /V f P4' -2 AGENDA ITEM: 6920/1de CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION /� �REEQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: // i/27/Z/ g/ �/( //t2 DATE: //5 - _ 1 ADDRESS: ?02 93 /�� �n S Jhz AGENDA ITEM: C1 /1(6 f) c7 �Z Amok CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION f - REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 4 • W DATE: ADDRESS: 371- cv t 01/412.6te-L Yt AGENDA ITEM: (x2 � b " No 5 5 Ink .0011k CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 44/r27,0(64 644 7, DATE: �O.."' l ADDRESS: eF c 7 g7, -04r-417 — AGENDA ITEM: Q --------- �. a CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ZY-Z>.-Y REQUEST TO SPEAK �- DATE: Z -/9�NAME: OD DATE: � ADDRESS: /$77 F P/ ST, 16.Ji<J /L ,cy AGENDA ITEM: Ate() / fikeeafrio Ss