The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980 04.02 City Council Regular Agenda (1?ACH le/ 4(1 U cr-; ; Z '"' /" (Oily o ache cOunction � COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING APRIL 2, 1980 7:00 P.M. 6:00 P. M. EXECUTIVE SESSION CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1980. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS (3) AWARDS TO PAST PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSSION MEMBERS CALL TO THE PUBLIC (PETITIONS) CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE UNFINISHED BUSINESS (TABLED ITEMS) NONE t. NEW BUSINESS (4) ORDINANCE NO. 44, PZ-5-80, BUCK (FIRST READING) (5) RESOLUTION NO. 80-10, ZONE OF INFLUENCE (6) ORDINANCE NO. 32, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE "FILING FEES AND COSTS" 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 COUNCIL AGENA CONTINUED REGULAR MEETING 4/2/80 Page 2 (7) ORDINANCE NO. 34, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE "PARKING AND LOADING" (8) ORDINANCE NO. 33, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" (9) AWARD OF BID, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PROJECT NO. 001-80 (10) RESOLUTION NO. 80-1.1, BOARD OF APPEALS (11) RESOLUTION NO. 80-12, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (12) EXECUTIVE SESSION, APRIL 16, 1980, 6:00 P.M. (13) INFORMATION AND REPORTS REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (14) ADJOURNMENT ROLL CALL ROLL CALL PRESENT ABSENT MAYOR SEEMAN '�MAYOR VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO v __ COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAf'1I ANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : _ YFS NO ABSTAIN COUN-CILMAIWURCESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON �f COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE AGENDA BE AMENDED BY THE DELETION OF ITEMS NO, 6, 7, AND 8, ITEM NO. 1 BE IT RESOLVED EY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING MARCH 19, 1980 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction was held on March 19, 1980, at the Apache Junction City Hall , pursuant to the notice as required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Virginia Seeman called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. at the Apache Junction City Hall . INVOCATION Councilman Eidson give the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice-Mayor John Granillo led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Virginia Seeman, Vice-Mayor John Granillo, Thomas Damiano, Jerry Burgess, Norman Hill , and Jimmy Eidson. Councilmembers absent: Marie Shanks (due to illness) Staff present: G. Ray Lee, City Manager Isabel C. Ballard, City Clerk Michael Curtis, City Attorney Richard Broman, Director of Public Works Marlis J. Davis, Director of Admin. Serv. Wm. McDaniel , Director of Public Safety Others present• Earleen Andrews, 480 E. Palo Verde, Apache Junction Dan Andrews, 1975 La Barge Rd., Apache Jct. Ray Prue ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA Vice-Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, THAT ITEM NO. 12 BE AND IS HEREBY REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA. Councilman Damiano seconded by motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING, 3/19/80 Page 2 ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 5, 1980 ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 5, 1980, BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 10, 1980 ) ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 10, 1980, BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Vice-Mayor Granillo seconded the motion. VOTE: Approval : Mayor Seeman Vice-Mayor Granillo Councilman Eidson Councilman Hill Councilman Damiano Abstain: Councilman Burgess (absent at the March 10th meeting) Motion carried. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS ) None CALL TO THE PUBLIC (PETITIONS) ) Earleen Andrews, 480 E. Palo Verde, Apache Junction, in behalf of the Tri-Chairman of the Lost Dutch- man Days and the Chamber of Commerce presented the City of Apache Junction with a Recognition Award for all the help the City gave on Lost Dutchman Days. Also presented was a Recognition Award for Galen Monson who worked for the City donating time helping out at the Rodeo Grounds. .r CITY MANAGER'S REPORT ) ) City Manager Lee, reported that he had three items, first he reported on the Public Works security fence on the State Land location was complete, which will enhance the capability of the Public Works Department. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 3 City Manager Lee called on the Building Official , Leo Frazier, to give a status report on the fee schedule that is currently under consideration. Building Official Frazier reported that the new fee schedule was prepared and ready for the Panning and Zoning Commission to review. Mayor Seeman brought to the attention of the City Council that the fee schedule being proposed was included in the City Council Agenda Packets. City Manager Lee reported that during the explosive growth of your City the first year, the employees have been examining their job rolls and descriptions on a. constant basis. One of our most dedicated and loyal employees, Ms. Ballard, has requested that the following letter be read into the record and that her resignation as City Clerk and acceptance of the position of Deputy City Clerk be noted. Mr. Lee read the letter as follows: Dear Madam Mayor and Council : After a career path evalua- tion in the most rapidly expanding City in the State and counseling with friends and the help of Mr. Lee, I believe it will be in my best career interest with the City of Apache Junction if I today submit my resignation as City Clerk and assume an appointment as Deputy City Clerk/Secretary to the City Clerk. This move I believe will help me accomplish my personal goals as a member of the City management team. I respectfully request my resignation be effective immediately, so I may assume the new position as Deputy City Clerk/Secretary. Sincerely, signed Isabel C. Ballard Mayor Seeman reported that the City Council as a whole would like to present Ms. Ballard with a Certifi- cate of Appreciation as the City's first City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARINGS SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE/GOLD DUST MOBILE HOME RESORT Mayor Seeman opened the Public Hearing for the Gold Dust Mobile Home Resort on "Small Game" Bingo License. The applicant Marvin Halbert was asked to speak on behalf of the .�► petition. Alice Benson, the Activities Director of the Gold Dust Mobile Home Resort reported she was representing Mr. Marvin Halbert. Vice-Mayor Granillo asked questions of Mrs . Benson on conducting Bingo Games and if there was adequate parking space. Mrs. Benson reported there was a problem with parking during the Lost Dutchman Days being a new park, but there hasn't been any since and they don't expect any problems in the future. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 4 Mayor Seeman requested if there was anyone from the public that wished to speak. There being no public input, Mayor Seeman closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDS APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPART- MENT OF REVENUE THE QUALIFIED ENDORSEMENT OF THE GOLD DUST MOBILE HOME RESORT "SMALL GAME" BINGO LICENSE TO BE CONDUCTED AT THE GOLD DUST MOBILE HOME RESORT, 202 N. MERIDIAN ROAD IN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. THE QUALIFIED ENDORSEMENT IS THAT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE BINGO GAMES WILL OCCUR SHALL NOT HAVE MOTOR VEHICLES PARKED IN THE VICINITY OF SAID BUILDING IN A MANNER THAT THE VEHICLES' PRESENCE WOULD BECOME A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE. Vice-Mayor Granillo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (TABLED ITEMS) ) None NEW BUSINESS AD HOC COMMITTE RECOMMENDATIONS ) Mayor Seeman referred to the two reports that were received from the AD HOC Committee on the Business License, if there are no objections from the City Council both Majority and Minority Reports will be accepted and filed, and she would like to further request the Council, perhaps consider a worksession after the City Council has time to review the reports submitted by the AD HOC Committee. ORDINANCE NO. 36 - ESTABLISHING A LIBRARY BOARD (SECOND READING) ) ) Vice-Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 36 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Mayor Seeman called on the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 36. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 5 City Clerk Ballard read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 36, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 BY ADDING ARTICLE 2-7 ESTABLISHING A LIBRARY BOARD PURSUANT TO ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 2; PROVIDING THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 36, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 BY ADDING ARTICLE 2-7 ESTABLISHING A LIBRARY BOARD PURSUANT TO ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 2; PROVIDING THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 37, ESTABLISHING AN AIRPORT COMMISSION (SECOND READING) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 37, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous Motion carried. Mayor Seeman called on the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 37 by title only. City Clerk Ballard read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 37, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, BY ADDING ARTICLE 2-9, ESTABLISHING AN AIRPORT COMMISSION, PROVIDING FOR APPOINT- MENT TO THE COMMISSION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 37, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 BY ADDING ARTICLE 2-9, ESTABLISHING AN AIR- PORT COMMISSION, PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMISSION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PRO- VIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 6 VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. .�. ORDINANCE NO. 38 - AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 13-2, APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE; STREET CLASSIFICATION PLAN; STREET DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENTS; STANDARD DETAIL AND SPECIFI- CATIONS ( SECOND READING ) Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 38 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Vice-Mayor Granillo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 38. City Clerk Ballard read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 38, AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 13-2, APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, BY ADDING SECTION 13-2-3 PERTAINING TO STREET DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF RIGHTS-OF- WAY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY , PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 38, AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, BY ADDING SECTION 13-2-3 PERTAINING TO STREET IMPROVEMENTS, THE ADOPTION OF A STREET CLASSIFICATION PLAN, REQUIRING THE DED- ICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION BY REFERENCE THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, PRO- VIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Uanimous • Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 7 ORDINANCE NO. 39, CREATING PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION (SECOND READING) Vice-Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 39 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous Motion carried. Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 39. City Clerk Ballard read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 39, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADDING ARTICLE 2-8, PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, TO THE CITY CODE: ESTABLISHING THE APACHE JUNCTION PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION; PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMISSION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 39, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADDING ARTICLE 2-8, PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO THE CITY CODE; ESTABLISHING THE APACHE JUNCTION PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMISSION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION; PRO- VIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND - IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 80-8 - ENDORSING THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATION FACILITIES Mayor Seeman explained the purpose of this Resolution is to assist a private company in their request for funding. Mayor Seeman called on the City Clerk to read the entire Resolution. • City Clerk Ballard read as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 80-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, ENDORS- ING AND ENCOURAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY .-. OF APACHE JUNCTION. WHEREAS, there is a need for recreational facilities within the City of Apache Junction; and WHEREAS, recreational facilities for citizens of Apache Junction to develop physical and mental potentials; and WHEREAS, this resolution does not suggest or bind the City to any financial obligations or other obli- gations of any kind; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Apache Junction hereby endorses and encourages the development of recreational facilities within the City of Apache Junction. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-8, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, ENDORSING AND ENCOURAG- ING THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNC- TION, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Vice-Mayor Granillo seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 40 - AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 18, BUSINESS LICENSE Mayor Seeman explained that the amendment was to correct a clerical error in the Business License Ordinance relating to the section on public service utilities. Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 40 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Dan Andrews, 1975 N. La Barge Road, requested that the amendment be read. 1 Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read the title of the Ordinance No. 40 and the section that is amending Ordinance No. 18. City Clerk Ballard read as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 ORDINANCE NO. 40 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-5-23, TO INCLUDE UTILITY AND/OR PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANIES ENGAGED IN FURNISHING GAS OR ,NW ELECTRICITY FOR LIGHT, FUEL, OR POWER, PROVIDING FOR PENALTY CLAUSE AND SEVER- ABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. SECTION 8-5-23 PUBLIC UTILITY TAX Utility and/or public service companies, who do not have a franchise agreement with the City of Apache Junction, engaged in furnishing gas or electricity for light, fuel or power, or in furnishing what for irriga- tion or domestic purposes, fire protection or other public or private purposes, or in transmitting messages or furnishing public telegraph or telephone services, shall pay, in addition to the quarterly business tax, a sum equal to two percent (2%) of the gross receipts of said utility or public service company from sales for residential and/or commercial purposes within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction. Such payments to be due and payable quarterly. Tax shall not apply to gross sales or gross income from sales to the United States Government, its departments or agencies which shall not be considered in the computation of tax. Vice-Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 40, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA AMENDING CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-5-23, TO INCLUDE UTILITY AND/OR PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANIES ENGAGED IN FURNISHING GAS OR ELECTRICITY FOR THE LIGHT, FUEL, OR POWER, PROVIDING FOR PENALTY CLAUSE AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 80-9 CONTINUANCE OF FLOOD STUDY Mayor Seeman explained that this is a continuation of the original flood study and a request to expand that study as it relates to the City of Apache Junction. Mayor Seeman called on the City Clerk to read the title of Resolution No. 80-9. City Clerk Ballard read ,..• as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 80-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, REQUESTING THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF STUDY IN PREPARATION OF ITS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP AS IT RELATES TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 10 Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE [•1AYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-9, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, REQUESTING THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF STUDY IN PREPARATION OF ITS FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP AS IT RELATES TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous Motion carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION, MAY 2, 1980, 6:00 P.M. ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVICE, BE HELD ON THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 1980, AT 6:00 P.M. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS ) Mayor Seeman reported that on KSTM Radio Station, beginning April 2nd and on each Wednesday thereafter, the Department Heads will be giving a City Hall talk for the public. Also if the public has questions that they would like answered on this program, to send them to the City of Apache Junction, P. 0. Box K, Attention: Office of the Mayor. The Councilmen will be participating as well as the Department Heads. Mayor Seeman further reported that Talent Bank Applications are needed to fill the newly formed Commissions. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL ) Mayor Seeman asked the City Council when they wished to have a Work Session or a Special Meeting on the Business License Ordinance to study the AD HOC Committee's recommendations. Vice-Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAVE A WORK SESSION ON MARCH 27TH AT 7:00 P.M. FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE BUSINESS LICENSE. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 11 Councilman Eidson expressed his concern on the strip annexation by the City of Mesa, and stated his reasons for his concern. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO CONDUCT A STUDY INTO THE FEASIBILITY OF FORMALLY DECLARING THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 'S ZONE OF INFLUENCE TO INSURE THE FUTURE PROTECTION TO ALL CITY RESIDENTS. Councilman Eidson asked the City Manager to explain the Zone of Influence. City Manager Lee explained that the Zone of Influence is described as that 3 mile radius outside the City limits. The Influence would include the potential site the City is interested in for the airport, which the City is pursuing a grant. This would also help satisfy the problem the City has with developers trying to comply with a Mesa Code, Apache Junction Code, and a Pinal County Code. The City would have Zone of influence for the protection of the public. They can not come in with that noxious industry on property contiguous to the City of Apache Junction and give problems with property values, etc. The City would not be annexing that area but simply performing a study that would determine whether or not it would be a prudent course for the Council to consider. Councilmembers discussed at lengths the recent annexation by the City of Mesa and the pros and cons in relation to the City of Apache Junction. City Manager Lee recommended that the City Council consider a formal resolution, outlining the Zone of Influ- ence so that the City of Apache Junction can go on record with the other Cities that we intend to explore that Zone of Influence to see what value it has to the City of Apache Junction. This would minimize any problem to the North, South, and East as an attempt to circle the City. The City of Apache Junction would send this Resolution to the City of Mesa and put their Council on notice that the City of Apache Junction is in the process of conducting a study and will come up with an impact on the residents of the City of Apache Junction for the next 15 to 20 years . Mr. Lee felt this should be staffed through the Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendations. City Manager Lee said that the staff can draft the Resolution based on the motion. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Ray Prue complained on a pond of water on the street in front of Johnny Below Zero's and stated that it is a health hazard and he has complained to City Hall , with nothing being done. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 3/19/80 Page 12 Director of Public Works Broman answered that the staff is aware of the problem, and it appears that it was created during the construction of the business in that area, which at the time, it was under the jurisdiction of Pinal County. The City has to take some action by contacting the property owner to see what action he would take to correct the problem. Mr. Broman further explained that the City can not just fill in the dip as it will not correct the problem, it would cause problems elsewhere and the City can not go on private property. Mayor Seeman thanked the Business License AD HOC Committee, Chairman Don Brooke, Earleen Andrews, Tom Lester, Martha Wright and Samford Gardom for the many hours spent, and invited them to come to the March 27th Work Session. ADJOURNMENT Vice-Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8: 15 P.M. Councilman Burgess seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL this day of 1980. Mayor Virginia Seeman ATTEST: Acting City Clerk Isabel C. Ballard .r ROLL CALL. VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: cal SECONDED BY : YFS_ NO ARSTAIi1 C o O TCf-fiM i IIKV F COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON L ' COUNC I LMAN H ILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN _ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1980, BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, p Mayor Seeman will have the CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION for Arthur Strange and Theron Adams for serving on the Planning and Zoning Commission. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : ..� YES AID ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEM8N UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ,�z,/(",i ,,tweeze ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : yFC ^1Q 1BSTAI�1 COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION / REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: _aR. ecl D i?A- DATE: .y- Z r VU ADDRESS: 7, p( 4t9 / A AGENDA ITEM: JU j^ 17 ,P 'n / ? 7 ,!eR CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: p L Dv17RA DATE:q— 2 — ADDRESS: .( ) ' ' 3"% AGENDA ITEM: (2i7y esv jR � &,'rf-1 �l-=�tI UORs CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME � . 67e/eZ2R 4 DATE: y` z--- ADDRESS: Q 41X / S- e -x1 AGENDA ITEM: 5 / R i;11� t 4 � / ROLL CALL. VOTE SHEET ` r NOTES ��, .ems, A - frx / ��, - ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : _ YFS NO_ ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: 4 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 1.;?le4-40-4-4- - DATE: ADDRESS: i<s‘ 1/1.6-0a~6(625- AGENDA ITEM: 4e, w CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK / NAME .�fivt�/��WS DATE: /�'2 e( //to ADDRESS: 1f73 tiDi LA .8A 6 „ed /' _4 I(D'A ITEM: [ (% r) ee L, t -6/( Ad' CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 7-2U 6'i/ 1-jt 4 S A2__ REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: / __________d_DATE: 2 / ADDRESS: 7 v h �v / AGENDA ITEM: 7 ifiP) -40. , 3_ 1,4) V 11 ")1)I::1"), ' 4,11Jeifr ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 6 - - 4g7' Lorideeff'-"' 245/ e&yir 01"4!C /i)Ottertj -4,a0v/ %/L 4114z)/14) Q1-io ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YFS: NO ABSTAIN , COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ✓Gti ITEM No. I- r., . R AGENDA ♦C 4 'Z .SS CITY MANNAGERY�/ ^ J► _....._ 4ir. REPORT gRiZONP i sty o 04pache 09unction March 26, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joseph W. Gero, Director ofPlanning SUBJECT: Rezoning Case PZ-5-80 Applicant: Virgil J. Buck Legal Description: Lot 11, Block 3, Newtown Subdivision (252 North Ironwood Drive) Required Zoning District Change from: GR to CR-4 The Planning and Zoning Commission has held an advertised public hearing on the above case. At the public hearing no persons spoke against the request, although several persons made comments and/or asked questions. Following the closing of the public hearing, the following motion was unanimously approved by roll-call vote. "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case (PZ-5-80) requested by Mr. Virgil J. Buck from General Rural (GR) to Multiple Residence (CR-4) for the property he owns located at 252 N. Ironwood Drive des- cribed as Lot 11, Block 3, Newtown Subdivision located in Apache Junction, Arizona. The reasons for recommEnding approval are: 1. The property is located on a Section line road (arterial) which has, and will continue to have, substantial traffic. ''\ 2. The subject area lies between Apache Trail and Superstition which is an area of mixed uses including nearby commercial uses on the Trail. 3. As such, apartments would provide an orderly transition. 4. CR-4 (Multiple Family) density is limited to one dwelling unit per 3500 square feet of lot area and construction of four plexes cannot be exceeded. 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 Mayor and Council Page 2 PZ-5-80 Director of Planning-Recommendation I concur with the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the reasons given. Further, the applicant will be required to provide on-site parking, and will be required to meet setbacks for any new units constructed. RL/JWG:an ORDINANCE NO. 44 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-80 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO MULTIPLE RESIDENCE (CR-4) : REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I. IN GENERAL The Zoning District classification of the parcel of land described as Lot 11, Block 3, Newtown Subdivision (also known as 252 N. Ironwood Drive) in Apache Junction, Arizona, be and hereby is changed from General Rural (GR) to Multiple Residence (CR-4) . SECTION II. REPEALING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III. PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 1980. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney PZ - 5 - 80 BUCK GR to CR - 4 SUPERSTITION of 4 NOT TO SCALE � rH a o N k �.� gu67ECT SITE 327 y' 25-Z ZROfv woo( DR. Lot//, 8LOGK 3, NEW roleN Sue. W. ROOSEVELT 600 CB -2 • , U.S. HWY. 60 - A PACHE TRAIL ROLL CALL. VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YFS NB ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO _ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL L COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 44 FOR THE FIRST READING, nal Qp,CHE✓ _....� Arr C„-:. 0� - o: :;,>s;r ass FOR Ali,.N ..A OF 44._‘) U H Z _ N\v BUSINESS INFO/REPORTS ....,.s. "IXCITY MANAGE e 4RI pNP ` ity C3pache unction March 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joseph W. Gero, Director of Planning J for Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Resolution on Zone of Influence Attached you will find a resolution recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission (3-24-80) to the City Council regarding pro- viding notice that the City intends to consider the future annexation Aftbk of those lands contiguous to and in the city's zone of influence. Mr. George Baljo, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission will be present and request to have ten minutes time to report cer- tain information from the Planning and Zoning Commission with regard to annexation. The staff will be present to answer questions. JWG/an attach. .•r 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 RESOLUTION NO. 80-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSIDER THE FUTURE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN AREAS CONTIGUOUS TO AND IN THE CITY'S ZONE OF INFLUENCE AND PROVIDING NOTICE THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction contains an area of approximately twelve (12) square miles; and WHEREAS, certain areas which lie outside the City limits are never- theless contiguous to the City and are located within the City's zone of influence; and WHEREAS, good land use planning requires that different land uses which are contiguous to each other be compatible with each other; and WHEREAS, good land use planning will ultimately attract a good comm- ercial and industrial tax base to serve the public interest and needs and will insure the fiscal soundness of both the City and the Apache Junction School District; and WHEREAS, in the interest of good land use planning the City is pre- paring a General Plan for the area within the City and for those areas contiguous to and in the City's zone of influence. .M W. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: 1. The City of Apache Junction declares its intention to consider the future annexation of those lands contiguous to and in the City's zone of influence. 2. Further, the City of Apache Junction requests its municipal neighbors to refrain from annexing territory in Pinal County contiguous to Apache Junction and in its zone of influence. 3. Further, the City Clerk is hereby instructed to provide notice hereof by publishing and posting this resolution and by sending certified copies to the Governor of the State of Arizona, the Commissioner of the Arizona Land Department, the Arizona Director of the Bureau of Land Management, the Central Arizona Association of Governments, the Mayors of the cities of Mesa, Chandler, and Gilbert, to the Pinal County Board of Supervisors, and to the Base Commander of Williams Air Force Base. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF 1980. .w. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: :`)(a_il. (---4527,44...Dx ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF . MOTION BY: CAC-- SECONDED BY : �_�� .....l YFS . NO ARSTA IN COUNCILMAN DAMIANO k COUNC I LMAN E i DSON COUNCILMAN HILL / COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN 1 T UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO. 80-10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO, 80-10, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSIDER THE FUTURE ANNEXATION OF THOSE LANDS CONTIGUOUS TO AND IN THE CITY'S ZONE OF INFLUENCE AND PROVIDING NOTICE THEREOF, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. P?ACHE ITEM No. .----_---' PPROvEC ON 7. �� t� Gitj pool C { aEARIAIG O Cif p; J DUS'NESS FOR AGENDA OF Wc-4Vg445 NCW BUSINESS Z INFO/REPORTS -rykL .._..,...,..... ...t•-- CITY MANAGER gR�zow-h. P Vitt' a� 04ruche &unction March 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager ~ ' FROM: Joesph W. Gerc,, Director of Planning,i,(f' SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance #32 - Rezoning Fees " " #33 - Planned Development " #34 - Parking Requirements Attached you will find copies of the above proposed ordinances. At its regular meeting of March 18, 1980, the Planning and Zoning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the proposed ordinances. Nobody spoke adversely on the proposals although several persons asked questions. Several minor changes to the draft of the proposed ordinances #33 and #34 were made by the Commission. Thereupon, they recommended the unanimous approval to the City Council of the three proposed ordinances. The current Zoning Ordinance has only one section which allows general apartment development being CR-5. It is my opinion that the one unit per 2,000 square feet of lot area is entirely too dense for a city having septic tank disposal. Without building upward, I believe the density factor to be impractical anyway. This was discussed with the Planning and Zoning Commission who currently has several rezoning applications for CR-5. The applicants have agreed to wait on the Planned Development Ordinance and city staff has reviewed their proposals which seem generally good. However, these applicants have been waiting several months and we are all aware of what is occurring in the money market. Should the City Council adopt these ordinances, it should be pointed out that the application process as in any other rezonings must take place. This includes notice and public hearings before the P & Z Commission before the applicant can come before the City Council for rezoning approval. This is a lengthy process. These proposals were prepared by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Citizen's Advisory Committee with staff assistance. As such, they represent input from developers, realtors, as well as other members of the community. The Commission .n� has held an advertised Town Meeting to acquaint the community with the proposals. 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 -2- PARKING The parking proposal sets forth what is projected to be reasonable requirements which would require a land user to provide reasonable on-site parking. The requirements also intend to not require more parking than what is in the public interest because too much asphalt reduces the percolation area for rainfall and creates added expenses for developers. • FEES The fees set forth the the Planned Development fee. The amount does not change ($100.00) from other rezoning fees. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT The Planned Development ordinance establishes another method for establishing land use zoning. Each of the other districts establish conventional require- ments for using land. The planned development concept would allow the developer some flexibility in designing his land use. With our terrain, potential flood problems and the way this area has been cut into lots (including the problems of federal patents) such flexibility appears to be desirable. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Director of Planning recommend approval of the three proposed ordinances as you now have them. In that there are a number of potential developments for the City to create needed apartments, and in recognition of the time and cost factors, it is further recommeded that the emergency clause be approved. ORDINANCE NO. 32 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JUNCTION,APACHE ARIZONA, AMENDING C THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING SECTION 2804 "FILING FEE AND COST" AND INSERTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW SECTION 2804 "FILING FEES": REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISONS: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS* SECTION I: IN GENERAL The Apache Junction, Arizona Zoning Ordinance be amended by repealing Section 2804 "Filing Fees and Cost" and inserting in lieu thereof a new Section 2804 to read as follows* SECTION 2804 FILING FEES: Petitions filed by property owners shall be subject to and accompanied by a non-refundable filing and investigation fee. The purpose of the fee shall be to defray, in part, the expenses connected with each application Schedule of Filing Fees A. Rezoning. . . . . $100.00 B. Planned development application $100.00 SECTION II: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III: SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such ^► decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Ordinance No. 32 Page 2 SECTION IV; EMERGENCY CLAUSE Whereas, it is necessary for the preservation of the peace , health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist , and this ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 11 . Mayor --_--- ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : ..� _ YFS S ' COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : ,,,) YFS Nn ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: SPECIAL NOTE: IF THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED BY EMERGENCY CLAUSE ORDINANCE NO, 33 AND ORDINANCE NO, 34 MUST PASS WITH AN EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AS THEY ARE A PACKAGE, ITEM NO, 6 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR Step 1 AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO 32 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED, (NOTE : This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if it does not have a unanimous vote, the City Clerk must read the ordinance in full ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 32 WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO, 32, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING SECTION 2804, "FILING FEE AND COST" AND INSERTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW SECTION 2804 "FILING FEES"; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. (MOTION WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) ITEM NO, 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 32 FOR THE FIRST READING , (ACTION WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) rrsi\CHE .-- Gti ITEM No. ......-.. .�, AppF.OVED ON ,�/-�` �� PU"L!C I;`AR!NG FOR AGENDA OF!/1 ^i? N. '�\U\\--4a71.v,;# 4; `� O OLD EUS;�iESSS :. r _ --- dity / REPORTS CITY MANAGER oep ache unction '�RIZONP March 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joesph W. Gero, Director of Planning , SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance #32 - Rezoning Fees II " 1133 - Planned Development ft " /f14 - Parking Requirements Attached you will find copies of the above proposed ordinances. At its regular meeting of March 18, 1980, the Planning and Zoning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the proposed ordinances. Nobody spoke adversely on the proposals although several persons asked questions. Several minor changes to the draft of the proposed ordinances #33 and 1134 were made by the Commission. Thereupon, they recommended the unanimous approval to the City Council of the three proposed ordinances. The current Zoning Ordinance has only one section which allows general apartment development being CR-5. It is my opinion that the one unit per 2,000 square feet of lot area is entirely too dense for a city having septic tank disposal. Without building upward, I believe the density factor to be impractical anyway. This was discussed with the Planning and Zoning Commission who currently has several rezoning applications for CR-5. The applicants have agreed to wait on the Planned Development Ordinance and city staff has reviewed their proposals which seem generally good. However, these applicants have been waiting several months and we are all aware of what is occurring in the money market. Should the City Council adopt these ordinances, it should be pointed out that the application process as in any other rezonings must take place. This includes notice and public hearings before the P & Z Commission before the applicant can come before the City Council for rezoning approval. This is a lengthy process. These proposals were prepared by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Citizen's Advisory Committee with staff assistance. As such, they represent input from developers, realtors, as well as other members of the community. The Commission has held an advertised Town Meeting to acquaint the community with the proposals. 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 -2- PARKING The parking proposal sets forth what is projected to be reasonable requirements which would require a land user to provide reasonable on-site parking. The requirements also intend to not require more parking than what is in the public interest because too much asphalt reduces the percolation area for rainfall and creates added expenses for developers. FEES The fees set forth the the Planned Development fee. The amount does not change ($100.00) from other rezoning fees. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT The Planned Development ordinance establishes another method for establishing land use zoning. Each of the other districts establish conventional require- ments for using land. The planned development concept would allow the developer some flexibility in designing his land use. With our terrain, potential flood problems and the way this area has been cut into lots (including the problems of federal patents) such flexibility appears to be desirable. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Director of Planning recommend approval of the three proposed ordinances as you now have them. In that there are a number of potential developments for the City to create needed apartments, and in recognition of the time and cost factors, it is further recommeded that the emergency clause be approved. e ORDINANCE N0 34 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING ARTICLE 21 "OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING . PUBLIC GARAGES AND FILLING STATIONS , " AND TNSERTING IN LIEW THEREOF A NEW ARTICLE 21 "PARTING AND LOADING" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 21 . 01 THROUGH 21 07 INCLUSIVE SECTION 21 01 , INTENTION AND PURPOSE, SECTION 21 . 02 , GENERAL PROVISIONS , SECTION 21 . 03 , DETAILED STANDARDS , SECTION 21 . 04 , OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS , SECTION 21 . 05 , LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS , SECTION 21 . 06 , PARKING : ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS , SECTION 21 . 07 , HANDI- CAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS . REPEALING ANY CON- FLICTING PROVISIONS • PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY • AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY . BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND 1HF CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS • SECTION I . IN GENERAL The Apache Junction , Arizona Zoning Ordinance be amended by repealing Article 21 "OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING : PUBLIC GARAGES AND FILLING STATIONS , " and in- serting in lieu thereof a new article to read as follows : ARTICLE XXI Section 21 00 PARKING AND LOADING Section 21 . 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE Section 21 02 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 21 . 03 DETAILED STANDARDS Section 21 . 04 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS Section 21. 05 LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS Section 21 . 06 PARKING : ADDITIONAL. REQUIREMENTS Section 21 . 07 HANDICAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS Section 21 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE OIN It is the intent and purpose of the parking and loading requirements to provide for adequate off-street parking spaces to serve residential , commercial , industrial , institutional , and other land uses , and thus help to prevent congestion of city streets Proper design of and access to parking facilities shall be required in order to protect the public health , safety and welfare . Furthermore , it is the intent and purpose of these regulations to promote the functional efficiency of all land uses by requiring off-street parking and loading facilities consistent with modern standards . Ordinance #34 Page 2 Section 21.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The provisions and maintenance of required off-street parking and loading facilities are continuing obligations of the property owner or tenant. Required parking spaces shall be im- proved as required and made available for use before final in- spection is completed by the Building Official. 2. In all zoning districts, when a building is enlarged or structurally altered, or a new building is constructed, or the use of an existing building is changed, off-street parking and loading spaces shall be provided prior to occupancy according to the requirements set forth in Section 21.04, Off-Street Parking Require- ments, and Section 21.05, Loading Facilities Requirements. When several uses occupy a single structure or lot, the total required parking shall be the sum of the requirements of the individual uses and further, when a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice of parking requirements could be made, the use which requires the gre2t,?st number of parking spaces shall govern. When a use may have more than one work shift or occupancy, the shift or occupancy with the greatest number of occupants shall govern. When there is a change in the use of a building or parcel of land, the difference between the number of required parking spaces for the new use and the number required for the previous legal use according to this Article even if spaces were not available for the previous use, shall be provided. 3. In all zoning districts, required off-street parking shall be located on the premises intended to be served. 4. Required parking spaces shall be available for parking of vehicles of residents, customers, patrons, and employees, and shall not be used for storage of vehicles, or materials, or for the ex- clusive parking of vehicles used in conducting the business or use, and shall not be used for selling, repairing, or servicing. 5. (Reserved.) 6. A plan, drawn to scale, indicating how the off-street parking requirements are to be met, shall accompany an application for a building permit where parking is required. The plan shall show all elements nec- essary to indicate that the parking requirements as set forth in this Article are being fulfilled, and shall include at least the following: Ask a. Delineation of individual parking spaces; and b. Circulation area necessary to serve spaces; and Ordinance #34 Page 3 c. Access to streets and property to be served; and d. Curb cuts; and e. Dimensions, continuity, and type of screening; and f. Grading, drainage, and surfacing details; and g. Delineation of obstacles to parking and circulation in finished parking area; and h. Specifications as to signs and bumper guards; and i. Landscaping. 7. When the unit of measurement determining the number of required parking spaces results in the requirement of a fractional space, any fraction up to and including one-half (0.5) shall be dis- regarded, and fractions over one half (0.5) shall require the additional one (1) parking space. 8. When parking areas are provided on a separate lot, the front set back requirements shall be determined as if applied to a one story structure within the zoning district where it is located. Section 21.03 DETAILED STANDARDS All parking and loading areas shall be developed and maintained as follows: 1. Driveways and areas used for loading, parking, and maneuvering of vehicles shall have a surface which is durable, all weather, and paved of either asphalt or concrete; except that lots over 5/8 of an acre shall only be required to pave the accessway from the property line for a distance of up to forty (40) feet. 2. Except for single family and duplex dwellings, driveways and areas for loading, parking and maneuvering of vehicles shall meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works with regard to traffic flow onto public streets and alleys. 3. A parking area shall be designed to dispose of all surface water accumulation within the area in such a manner as to prevent drain- age onto adjoining property, and shall meet all other drainage requirements of the Director of Public Works. .•. 4. A loading berth shall have minimum dimensions of fourteen (14) feet wide and fifty (50) feet long, and where covered shall have a vertical clearance of at least fourteen (14) feet. If the loading area in in the buildable area, this requirement shall not prevent the con- struction over the loading space clearance area. Ordinance #34 Page 4 5. Each required parking space shall be not less than nine (9) feet wide and not less than twenty (20) feet long, exclusive of access drives or aisles. 6. No obstructions of any kind shall be permitted within any designated parking space. 7. No parking space shall be located in a manner so as to block access to any other parking space, except on a parking lot with a parking attendant having access to each vehicle's keys. 8. Parking spaces shall be designed so that no backward movement of a vehicle onto a public right-of-way, other than an alley, will be necessary, except for single family and duplex dwellings. 9. When installed, bumper guards or wheel barriers shall be secured to the ground surface and shall be so installed that no portion of a vehicle will project onto a public right-of-way, over adjoining property, over a sidewalk, or into a required setback, land- scaping, or screen. 10. Lighting of a parking area shall not interfere with surround- ing areas or traffic flow. 11. Directional signs and pavement markings shall be used to con- trol vehicular movement in a parking area. Signs shall be limited to two (2) square feet each, and an aggregate total not to exceed twenty (20) square feet. No sign of any kind other than those indicating entrances, exits, name of establishment to which such parking area is accessory, or conditions of use shall be erected. No advertising on such signs shall be permitted. 12. No driveway over 300 feet long shall exceed a ten percent (10%) grade; and no driveway shall exceed seventeen percent (17%) grade. 13. A common driveway shall be permitted for adjacent residential lots. At least one-half (l ) the minimum required width of the ser- vice driveway shall be located contiguously on each lot. Legal evidence shall be presented to the Director of Public Works and approved by the City Attorney, in the forms of deeds, leases, or contracts to establish joint use, prior to zoning approval. 14. Where a parking area for a business or commercial use is a side yard or rear yard and adjoins a residential zoning district, a solid wall or fence of masonry or other approved fireproof material shall be constructed between the parking area and said district not less than four (4) feet nor more than six (6) feet in height, except that no fence shall be required within twenty (20) feet of Ordinance ##34 Page 5 public right-of-way. 15. No parking lot shall have a vehicular entrance or exit onto a public right-of-way within thirty (30) feet of a residential zoning district or within fifty (50) feet of any school grounds, public playground, church, hospital, sanitorium, public library or institution for dependents or for children. 16. Off-street parking areas shall be arranged so as to conform with the standards depicted in Figure 21-1, "Off- Street Parking Standards". 17. No driveway in a front yard shall be more than twenty (20) feet wide and the front yard driveway shall not be used in calculating parking spaces. The Director of Public Works, (or Arizona Department of Transportation on State or Federal highways) , may limit the number and location of curb cuts along a public right-of-way. ,t 18. (Reserved - landscaping and screening.) Section 21.04 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS The following sets forth the minimum number of parking spaces to be provided as regL _red in this Ordinance. Re- quirements for a building or use not specifically listed shall be determined by the Director of Planning or Building Official based upon the requirements of similar uses. 1. Residential a. ONE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT - Two spaces for the dwelling unit. b. DUPLEX AND MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS - Type of Required Parking Dwelling Unit Spaces (1) Studio or efficiency unit * 1 space per dwelling unit. (2) Family lodging house* 0.75 space for each person for whom living accommodations are provided. f � Ordinance # 34 rage 6 (3) One-bedroom apartment* 12 spaces per dwelling unit (4) Two or more bedroom 2 spaces per dwelling unit . apartment* *Accessory rooms , such as dens , recreation rooms , extra living rooms , or family rooms , (but excluding kitchens , dining rooms , bathrooms , and one living room) shall be calculated as a bedroom when determining the required off-street parking spaces . c . GROUP HOME One (1) space per bedroom , plus one (1) space for each staff member If counseling services are provided to non- residents , an additional one (1) space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area used by said counseling services shall be provided Commission may authorize provision of fewer parking spaces if there is a clear indication that the number of require,' spaces for a group home is unnecessary due to such factors as resi;.,ents being unable to drive due to age or mental or physical disability d . MOBILE HOME PARK One ( 1) parking space per mobile home space ; plus park- ing spaces for commercial or office uses as otherwise pro- vided in this Ordinance ; plus .^ one ( 1) parking space per each five (5) mobile home spaces , said spaces to be located in a security area e . TRAVEL TRAILER PARK One (1) parking space per travel trailer space ; plus parking spaces for commercial or office uses as otherwise provided in this Ordinance ; i Ordinance # 34 Page 7 plus one ( 1) parking space per each ten (10) travel trailer spaces , said spaces to be located in a security area . i . ROOMING HOUSE OR One (1) space per guest BOARDLNG HOUSE room, plus one ( 1) space for resident manager. 2 . Amusement park , fairground or transient show. (reserved) 3 Arena , stadium , auditorium, One ( 1) space for every four or theater . (4) seats ; twenty (20) inches of bench or pew shall be considered one ( 1) seat . ** 4 . A sEmbl�_ hill without seals One ( 1) space for each 100 -� - v --— square feet of floor area used tor assembly . 5 . Bank . One ( 1) space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area . 6 . Bar or nightclub . One ( 1) space for each 75 square feet of gross floor area . 7 . Bowing allej. Three (3) spaces for each alley . 8. Bus terminal One (1) space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area. 9 . Church . One ( 1) space for every seven ( 7) seats in the principal auditorium; twenty (20) inches of bench or pew shall be con- sidered one ( 1) seat . ** 10 . Clinic One (1) space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area . 11 . Clubj_ lodge , or meeting room. One ( 1) space for every four (4) seats ; twenty (20) inches of bench or pew shall be con- sidered one ( 1) seat ** Ordinance // 34 pace 8 12 . Club with overnight One (1) space for each two (2) accommodations . guest rooms or suites , plus requirement for a club. 13. Funeral. home . Eight (8) spaces per reposing room , plus one ( 1) space per funeral vehicle , plus one (1) space per employee . 14 . Home occupation . One ( 1 ) space , in addition to the required parking for the dwelling . 15 Hospital . 1 . 8 spaces per bed ; however , hospital bassinets shall not he counted as beds 16 . Hotel . One (1) space for each two (2) guest rooms or suites , plus one (1) space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area devoted to other uses . OIN 17 . Industrial establishment . One (1) space for each 1 ,000 square feet of gross floor area , of one ( 1 ) space for each four (4) employees on the largest shift , whichever is greater . 18 Motel . One ( 1) space for each guest room or suite , plus one (1) space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area devoted to other uses . 19 . Nursing home . One ( 1) space per two (2) beds . 20 Otfice . One ( 1) space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area . 21 . Pool hall . One ( 1) space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area. 22 . Racquet /handball court . Two (2) spaces per court . 23 . Restaurant One ( 1) space for each 100 square feet of floor area. Ordinance II 34 Page 9 24 . Restaurant -drive-in . (reserved) 25 . Retail store , service One ( 1) space for each 400 or repair shop . square feet of gross floor area. 26 . Retail store or service or One ( 1) space for each 800 repair shop that handles square feet of gross bulky merchandise , such as floor area furniture , large household appliances , or motor vehicles . 27 . School - business; secretarial , i.udustrialatechnical , or Six (6) spaces for each trade classroom. 28 . School - college or Two (2) spaces per 1 ,000 university square feet of gross floor area used for academic pur- poses , plus one ( 1) space for each four (4) student rooming unit , plus additional spaces as required for non-academic uses 29 School -_preschool , nurser, Two (2) spaces for each kindergarten , elementary , or classroom and administrative junior high . office . 30 School. - senior high . One ( 1) space for each ten ( 10) students for which the building was designed , plus one (1) space for each classroom and administrative office . 31 . Shopping Center . (reserved) 32 . Skating rink. One ( 1) space for each 100 square feet -of gross floor area. 33 . S_wimmi_ng_pool . One (1) space for each 100 square feet of pool , sunbath- ing , and picnic area. 34 . Tennis court Three (3) spaces per court . 35 . Wholesale establishment , One (1) space for each 5 ,COD warehouse , or air , rail , square feet of gross floor or truckir freight area , or one (1) space for ��rminal . each four (4) employees on � . .� the largest shift , whichever is greater. e - . Ordinance # 34 Page 10 ** Where permanent seating is not fixed , the seating capacity as determined by the Fire Chief , may be used to determine the number of seats . Section 21 . 05 LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS In all zoning districts , in connection with every building hereafter erected to be occupied by uses requiring the receipt or shipment by motor vehicles of materials or merchandise , there shall be provided and maintained on the same premises with such building off-street loading and unloading space accessible from an alley or easement of access , or when there is no such alley or easement of access , from a street One loading space shall be required for each 10 ,000 square feet of floor area . If less than 10 ,000 square feet exists , 5 ,000 or more square feet of floor area shall require one (1) loading space . Such space may occupy all or part of any required rear yard , except that no such space shall be located closer than fifty (50) feet to any lot in a residential zoning district unless wholly within a completely enclosed building or enclosed on all sides abutting said residential zoning district by a solid fence or wall not less than five (5) feet nor more than six (6) feet in height . Section 21 . 06 PARKING : ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1 In any residential district , all motor vehicles which are unlicensed or incapable of movement under their own power shall be stored in a rear yard in a completely screened space , garage or carport , except in an emergency 2 . One (1) travel trailer , which shall not be used for any purpose , may be stored or parked in a residential zoning district in the rear yard provided said trailer is stored in a garage or ramada , or in an area shielded from adjoining properties by an opague fence or planting Section 21 . 07 HANDICAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS (Reserved) SECTION II : REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES • All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , are hereby repealed . • Ordinance I/ 34 Page 11 SECTION III : SEVERABILITY If any section , sub-section , sentence , clause , phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof . SECTION IV : EMERGENCY CLAUSE Whereas , it is necessary for the preservation of the peace , health and safety of the City of Apacho Junction , Arizona , an emergency is declared to exist , and this ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , this day of , 19 Mayor ATTEST * City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ,,,w4r4* . k‘1,--41WW-NR174*.v..,-; 1 1 3O° FIGURE 21 1 I, fs. 12' ♦ OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS - ILLUST 11 01 0.01 0'.1.: t,)*• 11-15i-0i \ II 144 I I I 0 1#1 I 0110..el,t1 I, i9 : : :NANN; • - .. :,-s-b s .is, at:h •...:• .5 :,---- -S.— ":"::::.1 iti*,.‘ *******0.11:;ii '''A 0---/6-1 1 ***********4 r::` ‘t; Aft- • �/ .9/ 10\ ��/ ,S.'/ Yam/ zi, �5l/ ,�/ ^ A 19 1� .* �-- 1 D s • D '}�,.> 45 _ Iy, ♦ 141%\1414104F .;r _ , �-: ',AO'',1a' 1 0, #40:0 y , i" NJA = - - - - - - I— _ — — - - - - -- 11 i't �• r^ , y Df :� Ar 14 x ,.t n PARALLEL PGRX/n/G AILL DimEn/S/oNS ♦ 19 )1— T 5/NQLe STOLL ONLY 3/ ARE miN//huM O PROPERTY L/NE {� '� N IWR 1 t RcOU.�2E/»6n�TS11 J� a. A ONE WAY STREET- /3' M"^/ -*T.,. �� y, im ,' TLJO WAY STREET- Zy' /)/ ' / n 14 PRo PER 7V L/NE ° n — — — — — — — - -s- - - — - - - — ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: � YES NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT Step 1 THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO, 34, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED, (NOTE : This motion must have a nunaimous vote to carry; if it does not have a unanimous vote , the City Clerk must read the Ordinance in full ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 34 WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO, 34, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING ARTICLE 21 "OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING: PUBLIC GARAGES AND FILLING STATIONS, " AND INSERTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW ARTICLE 21 "PARKING AND LOADING" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 21. 01 THROUGH 21, 07 INCLUSIVE SECTION 21. 01, INTENTION AND PURPOSE, SECTION 21, 02, GENERAL PROVISIONS, SECTION 21, 03, DETAILED STAN- - DARDS, SECTION 21, 04, OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 21. 05, LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 21 , 06, PARKING; ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 21, 07, HANDICAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY , BE AND IS-_HEREBY_11102 E--D. __- (MOTION WI i-MM rMrRGFNCY Cl..iwsr) ITEM NO, 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 34 FOR THE FIRST READING, (ACTION WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) PQACHE✓o I I;M No. - -. --. d APPROVE-0 ON 31_..�.Z..�. Oct ti PU',1.1C HEARING ��► OLD 8US'NcSS 17 FOR AGENDA OF ,.!. : t: a • O !±.- NEW BUSINESS 4_ ; . ,"T,-.,,�.._._. INFO/ REPORTS CITY MANAGU �� __ . s . " io ' `Oit?y o Backe unction IRIZONP March 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joesph W. Gero, Director of Planning,,A4e, SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance #32 - Rezoning Fees " L-433 - Planned Development It " #34 - Parking Requirements Attached you will find copies of the above proposed ordinances. At its regular meeting of March 18, 1980, the Planning and Zoning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the proposed ordinances. Nobody spoke adversely on the proposals although several persons asked questions. Several minor changes to the draft of the proposed ordinances #33 and #34 were made by the Commission. Thereupon, they recommended the unanimous approval to the City Council of the three proposed ordinances. The current Zoning Ordinance has only one section which allows general apartment development being CR-S. It is my opinion that the one unit per 2,000 square feet of lot area is entirely too dense for a city having septic tank disposal. Without building upward, I believe the density factor to be impractical anyway. This was discussed with the Planning and Zoning Commission who currently has several rezoning applications for CR-5. The applicants have agreed to wait on the Planned Development Ordinance and city staff has reviewed their proposals which seem generally good. However, these applicants have been waiting several months and we are all aware of what is occurring in the money market. Should the City Council adopt these ordinances, it should be pointed out that the application process as in any other rezonings must take place. This includes notice and public hearings before the P & Z Commission before the applicant can come before the City Council for rezoning approval. This is a lengthy process. These proposals were prepared by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Citizen's Advisory Committee with staff assistance. As such, they represent input from developers, realtors, as well as other members of the community. The Commission A. has held an advertised Town Meeting to acquaint the community with the proposals. ISO NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 -2- PARKING The parking proposal sets forth what is projected to be reasonable requirements which would require a land user to provide reasonable on-site parking. The ` requirements also intend to not require more parking than what is in the public interest because too much asphalt reduces the percolation area for rainfall and creates added expenses for developers. FEES The fees set forth the the Planned Development fee. The amount does not change ($100.00) from other rezoning fees. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT The Planned Development ordinance establishes another method for establishing land use zoning. Each of the other districts establish conventional require- ments for using land. The planned development concept would allow the developer some flexibility in designing his land use. With our terrain, potential flood problems and the way this area has been cut into lots (including the problems of federal patents) such flexibility appears to be desirable. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Director of Planning recommend approval of the three proposed ordinances as you now have them. In that there are a number of potential developments for the City to create needed apartments, and in recognition of the time and cost factors, it is further recommeded that the emergency clause be approved. ORDINANCE NO . 33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW ARTICLE ENTITLED " ARTICLE XXX1II PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 33 . 01 THROUGH 33 . 11 INCLUSIVE . SECTION 33 . 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE, SECTION 33 . 02 PERMITTED USES , SECTION 33 . 03 PRO- CEDURE , SECTION 33 . 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED , SECTION 33 . 05 STAGING , SECTION 33 . 06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS , SECTION 33 . 07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES , SECTION 33 . 08 MIXED LAND USES , SECTION 33 . 09 GENERAL CRITERA, SECTION 33 . 10 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISIONS , SECTION 33 . 11 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS . REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS • PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY . AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY . BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I • IN GENERAL The Apache Junction , Arizona Zoning Ordinance be amended by adding thereto a new article to read as follows : ARTICLE XXXIII Section 33 . 00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT Section 33 . 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE Section 33 02 PERMITTED USES Section 33 . 03 PROCEDURE Section 33. 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED Section 33 05 STAGING Section 33 . 06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 33 07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES Section 33 . 08 MIXED LAND USES Section 33 . 09 GENERAL CRITERIA Section 33 10 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISIONS Section 33 . 11 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS Section 33 01 Intention and Purpose In certain instances the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance may be best achieved by the promotion of planned developments which do not conform in all respects to the land use pattern and regulations of conventional zoning It is the intention and purpose of the Planned Development Zoning District (PD) to provide for greater flexibility , and thereby encourage more creative design which may include a combination of different dwelling types and/or a variety of land uses which complement Ordinance #33 Erie 2 each other and which are congruous with existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity . Therefore , it is intended to enable the use and integration of contempor- ary land planning principles in such a manner as to promote its most appropriate use ; to allow diversification in the relationship of various uses , structures and spaces ; to facilitate the adequate and economical pro- visions of streets and utilities ; to preserve the natural and scenic qualities of open space ; and establish guidelines that will encourage the highest standards of design and construction ; to offer recreational opportunities close to home , to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural green spaces ; to counteract the effects of urban congention and monotony while providing the environmental amenities ; and provide the unified control of development of land . It is further the intent to insure substantial compliance with the General (Comprehensive) Plan adopted by the City now or in the future and spirit of intent of the Zoning Ordinance in requiring adequate standards necessary to promote the public health , safety and general welfare without unduly inhibiting the advantages of modern planning as a means of effectuatingdesirable development , redevelopment , P , rehabilitation , and conservation in the City of Apache Junction foi residential , commercial , industrial and other purposes Section 33 02 Permitted Uses 1 . The buildings and uses permitted in the Planned Development Zoning District shall be governed by the permitted uses in the base district or in a combination of base districts . The base district or districts from which permitted uses shall be determined shall include only those designated in the application and approved by the Council . 2 . Upon the approval of Council , the arrangement of uses on the land as permitted by the base district (s) , and the proportions of permitted land use defined by the underlying base district (s) may be adjusted , re-arranged or altered according to standards and regulations as provided in this Article . 3 Any use applied for and not specifically listed in this Zoning Ordinance , if approved by the Council , shall be designated to the base district for which the use , when applied , would most resemble Ordinance ##33 Page 3 4. By "base district" this Article means any conventional zoning district(s) as approved by the Council for a particular area. Normally, the base district(s) will be those existing or com- patible with existing conventional zoning districts in the subject area. Section 33.03 Procedure The development plan review shall be conducted according to the following steps, procedures and requirements notwithstanding any other provisions of this Zoning Ordinance. There shall be a three (3) step review process for planned development approval consisting of Step One: pre-preliminary; Step Two: preliminary; and Step Three: final approval. Each step is outlined below and each shall be approved before proceeding to the next step as provided. 1. General Procedure a. Application for a Planned Development Zoning District (PD) shall be filed in writing and on a form approved by the Commission in the manner required for amending the Zoning Ordinance. No application shall be accepted unless it is complete and is verified as to the correctness of information given by the signature of the applicant attesting thereto. The applicant, or his designated representative, is requested to be present at each public hearing on their application. b. The proposed planned development shall be in one (1) owner- ship or control, or the subject of a joint application by the owners of all the property included. c. At the time of filing of the preliminary plan, a fee shall be due in the amount prescribed for "Planned Development" on the most current City of Apache Junction Schedule of Filing Fees as found in Section 2804 of the Zoning Ordinance. d. The application shall be accompanied by plans, filing doc- uments and information as prescribed in this Article, or as prescribed by the Commission. e. An application for a planned development must be filed not less than eighteen (18) days prior to the public hearing. Ordinance #33 Page 4 2 . Step One • Pre-Preliminary Application ON a The approval of Step One shall be construed as only concept approval for the given site and shall not be construed as approval of any zoning amendment . b The Planning Department staff shall determine whether the planned development requirements of this Article are complied with . If the developer disagrees with the determination , the applicant by request , or the staff , may take the pre-prelim- inary information to the Planning Commission for its determination of whether this site is suitable fox development as a planned development . This step does not require an advertised public hearing. 3 Step Two . Preliminary Application (General Development • Plan) a The approval of Step Two shall be preliminary approval of the specific project on the desig- nated site and shall create the zoning map change . b Investigation and Reports-Planning The Director of Planning shall cause to be made by himself or members of the staff , and in co- operation with other appropriate city departments and consultants an investigation of facts and review of all applications and documents presented hereunder as will serve to provide all necessary information to assure that the action of each applicant is consistent with the intentions and purpose of this Article . At the appropriate stage (s) the Director of Planning , or designated representative , shall submit a prepared report to the Commission for consideration and may recommend that the application be approved as submitted , approved with conditions , denied , or returned to the applicant for revision . c Review by Planning and Zoning Commission Thereafter , the Commission shall review the application for Planned Development and shall hold a public hearing(s) as required . Atter such hearing , the Commission shall determine whether the proposal conforms to the criteria and Planned Development Ordinance #33 Page 5 Requirements as set forth in this Article , and shall es either recommend to the Council that the preliminary application and development plan be • 1) Approved ; or 2) Approved requiring changes therein ; or 3) Shall return the plan and application for revision ; or (4) Denied . d . Council Consideration Upon the recommendation from the Commission , the Council shall advertise and hold a public hearing upon the re- quest After the conclusion of such hearing (s) , the Council shall either : 1) Approve the application as recommended by the Commission ; or 2 ) Approve the conditions requiring changes or impose such conditions of approval as are in its judgment necessary to insure conformity to the criteria and the Planned Development Regulations as set forth in this Article ; or 3) Shall return the plan and/or application for revision to the applicant ; eN or 4) Shall deny the application as submitted ; or 5) May refer the application to the Commission for their reconsideration and a subsequent report to the Council 4 . Step Three : Final Application (Precise Development Plan) a Approval of Step Three shall be given only when it can be shown that the proposed project , or any stage of the total development plan , meets all requirements as set forth for final approval in this Article plus all requirements , stipulations , and modifications of the preliminary plan as required by the Council have been met . b . Within one ( 1) year after the approval of a preliminary development plan , the applicant shall file with the De- partment of Planning a final plan for the entire develop- ment , or when submission in stages has been authorized , for the first stage of the development . The Commission , after the first year and at its discretion , may extend the date for submission of the final plan for one ( 1) additional year providing that the circumstances warrant such an extension . c The Commission shall not approve the final development plan for any stage of the Planned Development if either the total number of stages developed and /or the average of the allowable dwelling units per stage , up to and in- cluding the stage which is to be approved , exceeds by more than twenty-five (25) percent the average number of dwelling units per stage which is allowable for the entire planned development Ordinance #33 ?pee 6 d . The Commission shall consider for approval all final plans . Provided all the requirements of this Article are met the Commission shall grant such approval , except that where action of the City Council is required said approval shall be subject to City Council approval of specific items . 5 . General a For any area of which the City has a valid application for annexation and which also has a valid application filed for a planned develop- ment , the applicant shall have the base district considered as an integral part of the Planned Development application . b Should the zoning of the base district be inappropriate for a proposed PD , changing of the base district shall be accomplished as an integral part of approval of the Planned Development application Under the PD application , the base district zone change shall not be approved without approving the Planned Development Application . Section 33 . 04 Documentation Content Required The following information and documents shall be submitted with the application to the Department of Planning . 1 ,Step_One : Pre-Preliminary Stage Consideration a . A letter of intent for a Planned Development shall be submitted by the owner or authorized agent . Before submitting an application for a Planned Development , the applicant is urged to confer with the Department of Planning to obtain an application and discuss procedures , fees , schedules and assistance An accurate map drawn to sufficient scale to adequately show the boundaries and dimensions of the site , a north arrow , the scale , names and dimensions of all streets , alleys and ease- ments bounding or touching the site . The map shall also include schematic reference showing the plot plan of the land in the area to be developed indicating . 1 . The general relationship contemplated among all public and private uses ; and M Ordinance #33 Page 7 2 . The location , dimensions and direction of any major physiographic features such as railroads , drainageways and existing man-made physical features , and 3 . All private rights-of-way proposed ; and 4 . Location of all proposed structures ; and 5 . Location of all proposed common open space ; and 6 . Location of any flood hazard areas as determined by the Federal Emergency Pre- paredness Agency . U An explanatory statement containing the following information : 1 A showing of property ownership including all easements ; and 2 . The source of water supply , method of sewerage disposal and means of drainage ; and 3 . Approximate number and types of units proposed for the site ; and 4 Any proposed non-residential uses (i . e . commercial , industrial , etc . ) ; and 5 . Public and private egress , and 6 . Areas to be devoted to various uses and population densities contemplated for the project , and 7 . The area total for the project site . 2 . Step Two . Preliminary Stage Consideration a . One (1) transparency and four (4) prints of a development plan of the entire development showing : 1 General location for vehicle and pedestrian circulation indicating streets , driveways , sidewalks (if any) , pedestrian ways , off- street parking , loading areas and provision for fire and other emergency vehicles . 2 . Location and approximate dimensions of structures together with the usage to be contained therein and approximate location of all entrances thereto showing character and relationships of buildings , streets , and open area . 3 A description of adjoining areas , uses or structures which may affect , or be affected by , the design or location of buildings of the development or the uses or traffic circulation therein Said description shall include maps and information for at least four hundred feet (400 ' ) beyond the development . Ordinance #33 Page 8 4 . A description of the general scheme of land- scaping to be employed including the extent , location arrangement and proposed improvements of all open areas , landscaping ,fences , and walls . Said description shall include per- spective schematic renderings . Proposed provisions for maintenance of all open areas shall be included . 5 . The Director of Public Works may require the submission of contour information for a portion of , or the total development site , when such information is deemed necessary to adequately evaluate the Planned Development . When re- quired , the information shall conform at least to the following minimum standards i Contour information given shall be tied to USGS or GLO datum. At least one ( 1) bench mark , at or close to the property shall be required . Contour elevations shall conform to ground slope intervals as required by Subdivision Ordinance and/or: ii . Contour elevations at the centerline of all private and public streets , roadways , driveways and parking areas within the project area. 6 . Cross-sections through the property showing grades and building height relationships shall be included . 7 . General provisions to be made for utilities and storm drains . 8 . General provisions for handling storm water runoff shall be indicated b . Four(4) copies of the following information and documents . 1 A tabulation of the land area to be devoted to various uses including an indication of land to be dedicated for street , park , school , or any OIS other purpose . 2 . A development schedule indicating (1) the approximate date when construction of the project can be expected to begin; (2) the stages in which the project will be built and the approximate date when construction of each stage can be expected to begin . Ordinance #33 Page 9 3 . Architectural drawings , sketches , perspective schematic renderings , or scale models necessary to demonstrate the design and character of the proposed development . 4 . A draft of the major points for covenants proposed affecting the property 5 . A lighting plan including proposed street and security lighting , an analysis of the effect of such proposed lighting on adjacent property , and such other information as may reasonably be necessary . 6 . A signing plan including the location , type , size , height and area of proposed signs . 7 An indication of whether or not land is to be subdivided 8 . A certified legal description or boundary survey by a registered engineer or registered surveyor of the property , or properties , to he included in the total development including all easements ; and 9 . Other relevant operational data and such reasonable information as the Commission and/or Council may require including an updating of all information submitted for pre-preliminary approval . 3 . Step Three . Final Stage Consideration The information submitted shall be sufficiently detailed to indicate fully the ultimate operation and appearance of the development and shall include all information submitted in the preliminary plan plus the following: a . The location of water , sewerage and drainage facilities . b . Landscaping and planting plan showing location , number and name of all trees and major shrubs ; trees over 6" in trunk diameter to be removed by development shall be so marked . c . The character and location of signs in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance . d . Plans for street improvements and finished grades or earth moving plansSpecific S ecific request for modification of traffic barriers and provisions for the relocation of utilities should be made e . Location and dimensions of pedestrian walkways , malls , trails or any easements . f . Comprehensive soils and geological reports substantiat- ing the soundness of the development shall be submitted by a soil analyst if required by the Building Official . Location and of parkingareas and g . ocati n dimensions other car maneuvering areas including location of driveways and other access points . h . Copies of legal documents required by the Council for dedication or reservation of public facilities . i Requirements for subdivision , if applicable , as set forth in the Subdivision Ordinance . Ordinance #33 Page 10 j . If development is in stages , the approximate ,.� date when the stage i5 to be complete . Section 33 .05 Staging When development by stages is requested , the Planning Commission shall review the preliminary application , re- quired documents , proposed development schedule and any other information or documents necessary to determine that the proposed total development meets the intent and purpose for "Planned Development" as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance , and to further determine if in the judgment of the Council the proposed development is of the scale and design to warrant approval of staging . When submission in stages has been authorized by the Council , the following shall apply : 1 1he time schedule , as described in 33 .04 . 02 (b) (2) , indicating the approximate date on which construction of the project will begin and the anticipated rate of development shall become a part of the planned development preliminary approval and shall be adhered to by the applicant and any successors in interest . 2 . When more than one (1) area of a proposed planned development area is proposed for subdivisions , sub- mission of subdivision proposals for a specific area shall not be made until such time as the developer intends to proceed with each such area of development . Section 33 06 Development Standards In addition to , or as a greater requirement to the regulations normally found in the district , the following regulations shall apply to all development within a Planned Development Zoning District . 1 Density - The developer shall propose a density subject to Council approval. Upon the adoption of a City General (Comprehensive) Plan the allowable density shall not exceed that as set forth in said Plan . Further , the density shall not exceed that as permitted in the base zone ; provided , that the density restrictions of this section may be amended as set forth below : Ordinance #33 Page 11 a . Incentive Density Increases - Design , character , identity , and architectural siting variations incorporated into a develop- ment shall be considered cause for population density and building intensity increases not to exceed fifteen (15 ) percent of that allowable in the zone underlying the application , pro- vided they make a substantial contribution to the objectives of a Planned Developement . The degree of distinctiveness, and desirable variation achieved shall govern the amount of density/ intensity increase which the Council may approve . The Council shall consider three major design features of each project when considering incentive density increases . The Council may grant up to five (5) percent increase in density for each of the three (3) major design areas which follow. Some specific design features are included under each of the three major headings to aid in the consideration of each project ' s merit . 1 . Landscaping (Maximum increase of five percent (5%) : 1 . Street landscaping for this area ; 2 . Open space and plazas ; 3 Use of natural landscape ; 4 . Pedestrian way treatment , 5 . Recreational areas . 2 . Siting (Maximum increase of five percent ( 5%) : 1 . Visual features ; 2 . Use of natural features (water , etc . ) ; 3 . View; 4 . Sun and wind orientation ; 5 . Circulation pattern ; 6 . Physical environment ; 7 . Variation in building setbacks ; 8. Building groups ( cluster , etc ) . 3 . Design features (Maximum increase of five percent ( 5%) : 1 . Street sections ; 2 . . Architectural style , 3 . Harmonious use of materials ; 4 . Parking area broken by landscape ; 5.. Varied use of house types . Ordinance ##33 Page 12 b Density Limitations -- If the Council finds that any of the following conditions would be created by a proposed Planned Development , it may either ( 1) prohibit any in- crease in density , or (2 ) decrease the basic density allowance by up to fifteen percent ( 15%) in order to avoid the creation of any of these conditions • 1 . Inconvenient or unsafe access to the Planned Development ; 2 . Traffic congestion which could be projected on the surrounding streets as a result of the existing conditions and approval of the planned development application , and which could thereby create a potential hazard to the health , and genera] welfare of the residents which adjoin the planned development site . 3 . Excessive burden on parks , recreational areas , schools , and other public facilities which serve the Planned Development . c . Planned Development in more than one ( 1) district -- If the Planned Development is in more than one ( 1) zoning district , the number of allowable dwelling units must be separately calculated for each portion of the Planned Development that is in a separate zone , and must then be combined to determine the number of dwelling units allowable in the entire Planned Development However , the distribution of dwelling units and lot sizes within the Planned Development need not be affected by existing zoning district boundaries . Individual buildings , accessory buildings , off-street parking and loading facilities , open area , and landscaping and screeening may be located without reference to lot lines , save the boundary lines of the development . When calculating density of a proposed Planned Development , the total area , including street dedication , shall be included . d A proposed Planned Development may have specified reasonable minimum lot sizes or other minimum re- quirements for a part of , or all , of the planned development area. Ordinance ##33 Page 13 2 . Setbacks and Spacing between buildings -- a Perimeter setbacks - Generally these setbacks will be those of the base district unless otherwise approved by the City Council . b . Interior setbacks - As approved by the City Council , provided no Setbacks shall violate requirements of the Iniform Building Code or Uniform Fire Code . f c . Buildings should be located in such a manner so as to avoid , when possible , a corridor or barracks-like effect . d . Increased setbacks - Setbacks greater than those of the immediately adjacent property may be required where the intensity of development is greater than that of the adjacent property to such an extent that greater peripheral setbacks are needed in order to insure the health , safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the development of said adjacent property . e . In reviewing setback requirements the following criteria shall help govern the degree an appli- cant shall be permitted to deviate from the base zoning district requirements 1 . A better or more appropriate design can be achieved by not applying the provision of the zoning district ; and 2 . Adherence to the requirements of the zoning district is not required in order to insure health , safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the development ; and 3 . Adherence to the requirements of the zoning district is not required in order to insure that property values of adjacent properties will not be reduced 3 . Height ^ a . Generally , no building shall exceed a height which is twenty-five (25) percent greater than that of the maximum building height limitation of the base district in which the planned development is proposed . b . The Council may approve different extra limita- tions not less than that provided in Subsection a , provided that the proposed height is not detrimental , incompatible or otherwise unde- sirable with respect to existing or proposed Ordinance # 33 Page 14 future surrounding area development , and provided that one of the following situations can be found to exist : 1 . That the height increase can be justified on the basis of unique lot characteristics , topographical conditions , or other natural features , or 2 . That the height increase can be justified on the basis of amenities provided or con- )cessions made by the developer for which some bonus incentive is warranted c . When the Planned Development abuts or is in a single family base district , the building height for the base district shall apply within 200 feet of the said Single family base district . 4 . Usable Open Area a . There shall be a minimum of ten percent ( 10%) of the total area of the Planned Development dedicated or reserved as common usable open area. Such area shall be clearly designated on the plan as to character of use and develop- ment , but shall not include . 1 . Private or public dedicated streets , alleys and other rights-of-way . 2 . Vehicular drives , parking , loading and storage areas b . The required minimum lot area for any single family dwelling unit within a planned develop- ment project may be reduced by one ( 1) square foot for each one (1) square foot of common usable open area substituted in the project site elsewhere , and provided that the minimum lot area is not reduced by more than twenty percent (20%) The substitute common open area may not be counted toward the minimum required open area for the planned development site . c. With a planned development , a planned residential area may have distributed without regard to the underlying zone , the required open area. d . When , with a PD , a planned residential area is constructed by stages , the plans for usable open area shall include provisions for such areas within each staged area . Ordinance #33 Page 15 e . Required usable open area shall be complete as to /, approved specifications prior to occupancy of the planned development , or an approved stage thereof . 5 Off-Street Parking Facilities-- The following shall be applied in all Planned Developments : a Parking requirements shall be equal to at least the sum of the parking requirements for all uses proposed and which is equal to that required by Article 21 herein , except that those requirements may be increased or decreased where the Council determines that because of the location of the property with respect to surrounding areas within reasonable walking distance , and or public trans- portation , or any other consideration reasonably relating to the nued for parking in the development , such increase or decrease is appropriate However , in a commercial or industrial planned development where it can be demonstrated by the applicant that due to nonconflicting hours of operation , design eN of the circulation and parking plan or any other factor reasonably related to the need for parking the total parking requirement can be reduced , the Council may do so provided legal notice of the application specifies that such reduction has been requested b Development standards shall he as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance except that the following shall also be guidelines : 1 . Private streets may serve circulation and parking purposes if providing adequately for fire and police protection , rubbish collection and lighting , as established by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Public Safety . 2 . A building group may not be so arranged that any temporarily or permanently inhabited building is inaccessible by emergency vehicles . 3 . Driveways and circulation roadways shall be designed to minimize traffic and congestion within the Planned Development and to minimize the amount of paving . 4 Circulation and parking areas shall be separated from recreational areas to facilitate safe vehicular movement In the design of the circu- lation and parking plan , priority shall he given to pedestrian access and activity Ordinance #33 Page 16 c . Any required parking spaces serving residential uses shall be located within two hundred (200) ek feet of the building containing the living units served Section 33 . 07 Dedication and maintenance of facilities -- The Commission may recommend and the City Council may require as a condition of apprcval for any planned development , that portions of the tract or tracts under consideration be set aside , improved , conveyed or dedicated for the following uses : 1 Streets : That the right-of-way width designated be dedicated to the City Such other streets necessary to the proper development of adjacent properties may also be required . 2 . Easements . That owner shall grant to the. City such easements as will be required to insure the necessary and orderly extension of public utilities , including easements over all non-dedicated private streets over eN which the City may need ingress or egress for the purpose of protecting and preserving the health , safety , and welfare of the public and for the provision of municipal services of which each citizen within the City has a right to expect and may require at any future time. 3 Underground Utilities : In any development which is primarily designed for or occupied by dwellings , all electric and telephone facilities , fire alarm conduits , street lighting wiring , and other wiring , conduits • and similar facilities shall be placed underground by the developer , unless waived by the Council . 4 Recreation Facilities . The Council may require that suitable area for parks or playgrounds be set aside , improved or permanently reserved for the owners , residents , employees or patrons of the development . Section 33 08 Mixed Land Use 1 . Residential use mixed with other uses -- a . In a residential planned development of over four ( 4) acres , or where development is by stage and where commercial and /or industrial uses are being developed in conjunction with residential uses , construction of commercial 1 .5 Ordinance ##33 Page 17 and/or industrial uses shall not be initiated until a percentage of residential units to be ON specified in the planned development approval have been developed The Council may specify stages of approval for industrial or commercial use to coincide with a minimum percentage of residential uses completed b . A basic premise shall be that such retail and service commercial development and /or industrial development be ancillary to , basically serve , and integrate in a compatible fashion with the primary residential use and character of the planned development district and surrounding properties . Section 33 . 09 General Criteria In addition , a planned development may be granted only if it is found that the development conforms to all of the following general criteria . That the location , design , size , and uses ate consistent with the General (Comprehensive) Plan , adopted _ by the City now or in the future , and with any other applicable plan , development map , or ordinance adopted by the City Council . If the development plan is found to be in the public interest , but is in conflict with the General (Comprehensive) Plan , amendment of the General (Comprehensive) Plan shall be approved before approval may be granted for the Planned Development application . 2 . That the location , design , and size are such that the development can be well integrated with its surround- ings ; is planned and developed with the intention to harmonize with any existing or proposed development in the adjacent neighborhood ; and in the case of a departure in character from surrounding uses , that the location and design will adequately reduce the impact of the development so the project will not be detrimental to the adjacent property . ek 3. That the location , design , size and uses are such that traffic generated by the development , except in single family density , can be accommodated safely without congestion on existing or planned arterial or collector streets and shall , in the case of Ordinance #33 Page 18 OIN commercial or industrial developments , be designed to attract and accomodate traffic on local arterial or collector streets . 4 That the location , design , size and uses are such that the residents or establishments to be accommodated will be adequately served by existing or planned public facilities and services . 5 . That the location , design , size and uses should result in an attractive , healthful , efficient and stable environment for living , shopping , working and leisure activities . 6 . That the development plan makes appropriate provision for th preservdtion of the environment , both natural and man-made . Section 33 . 10 Planned Development Subdivisions 1 . Conversionso.t pre-existing subdivisions to Planned Developments a The Council may approve a Planned Development for an area previously subdivided , in which case said subdivision , and any structure con- structed thereon , shall he considered in con- formance with zoning requirements as to lot size , setbacks , and height Such an area may include a group of structures either sub- stantially constructed or in existence at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance , which structures when constructed were intended to be similar in purpose and ate substantially similar in design and purpose on the effective date of this Ordinance . b Applicants for conversions of pre-existing subdivisions to Planned Development District zoning shall follow the application and pro- cedures for plan review as set forth in this Article , except that during the pre-preliminary conference the Director of Planning shall advise the applicant as to appropriate modifications which might be made in application requirements . c . In a pre-existing subdivision , the signatures of 51% of the property owned by both number and area shall be required to initiate a planned development application for such area. Ordinance #33 Page 19 Section 33 . 11 Supplementary Provisions 1 . Limitation on resubmission Whenever an application for a planned development has been denied , a similar application for the same area or any portion thereof shall not be filed within six (6) months after the date of denial . 2 Adherence to ap proved plan and modification thereof The applicant shall be bound by the plans and narrati\ e for himself and his successors in interest , Ind by the conditions prescribed for approval of the development . The approved final plan and stage development schedule shall control the issuance of all building permits and shall restrict the nature , location and design of all uses . Minor changes in an approved preliminary or final development plan may be approved by the Building Official if such changes are consistent with the purposes and general character of the development plan All other modifications and amendments , and all major changes , including extension or revision of the stage development schedule shall have a public hearing for consideration and action by the Council . Revocation for failure to adhere to approved plan , satisfy conditions of approval , or comply with staple development schedule In the event of a failure to comply with the approved preliminary or final development plan or any prescribed condition of approval , including failure to comply with the stage development schedule , shall constitute a violation of this Article as prescribed in Article 27 . The Commission may , after notice hold a public hearing and recommend the revocation of a planned development zoning district . Thereafter the Council shall consider the recommendation in the same manner as in considering a rezoning request . 4 . .Expiration and reversion of Planned Development Zoning District If within one ( 1) year after the approval of the preliminary plan and designation on the Apache Junction Zoning Map by the Council , construction specified in the final development plan has not been w Ordinance #33 Page 20 commenced , or cannot be developed as approved , then the PD District classification shall be recalled to the Commission for review. If it has not been shown that it is in the public interest , and if the applicant has not demonstrated good cause necessitating the extension of time , the Commission shall recommend the PD designation revert to the base zone designation existing at the time of approval of the Planned Development Zoning District , or other appropriate designation . II however , the applicant shows good cause necessitating an extension which would serve the public interest , then the Commission may grant two (2 ) extensions of time to commence substantial construction . Each extension of time shall not exceed a one (1) year period . 5 . Transfers and assignments - If during any stage of the development the property under application , or any portion thereof , is trans- ferred or assigned to another , then the transferee OMS or assignee shall be bound to the requirement and design of the approved project ; except that a transferee or assignee may make application for a major change of the application in which case the Council shall hear the application as if it were a major change in the Planned Development . 6 . Cancellation by applicant Cancellation may be initiated by the applicant of the property covered by the application by means of a written Notice of Cancellation directed to the Department of Planning Cancellation of the applica- tion shall become effective thirty (30) days after receipt of the Notice of Cancellation in the Office of the Department of Planning . 7 Use or occupancy No building or structure within the planned development or portion thereof as approved for stage development shall be used or occupied , and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy thereof as provided under the provisions of the Uniform Building Code • Ordinance ##33 Page 21 8 Planned Development_precedents eiNk The approval of departures from standards ordinarily required for a base district zone , or for any other planned development , shall not be considered as precedent setting when approved for any individual planned development project . 9 . Construction standards -- building_permit issuance The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes and derailed standards shall apply and control all design and construction of improvements within a planned development . 10 . Map change and mapping Map Chace- Approval by the City Council of the pre- liminary development plan in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance shall constitute approval of the necessary amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the ^ City of Apache Junction and the map shall be changed in accordance with the approved site area . Whenever a planned development has been approved and remains in effect , the boundary of the planned development shall be indicated on the Zoning Map of the City 11 . Termination of a Planned Development after .ompletion A planned development may not revert to any base district designation upon completion unless and until all requirements of the base district are complied with Should the applicant or any transferree or assignee , of an approved planned development wish to discon- tinue the PD use , or uses , upon or after completion , any use , or uses , of the land including the continua- tion of the planned development zoning district designation shall be reviewed and may be approved by the Council . SECTION II : REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , are hereby repealed . Ordinance #33 ti Page 22 SECTION III : SEVERABILITY If any section , sub-section , sentence , clause , phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof . SECTION IV : EMERGENCY CLAUSE Whereas , it is necessary for the preservation of the peace , health and safety of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , an emergency is declared to exist , and this Ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , this day of , 19 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ' APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ROLL CALL. VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : YFS u n i3J1STAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # - MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YFS NO ABSTAIl COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN , - - UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : ) YFS 4 yf ARSTA I N , COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR Step 1 AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 33 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED, (NOTE . This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry, if it does not have a unanimous vote , the City Clerk must read the ordinance in full) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 33 WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, — BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR ep 4 AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO, 33, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW ARTICLE ENTITLED "ARTICLE XXXIII PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 33, 01 THROUGH 33 , 11 INCLUSIVE; SECTION 33 , 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE, SECTION 33 , 02 PERMITTED USES, SECTION 33 , 03 PROCEDURE, SECTION 33, 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED, SECTION 33, 05 STAGING, SECTION 33 , 06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 33 , 07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES, SECTION 33 , 08 MIXED LAND USES, SECTION 33 , 09 GENERAL CRITERA, SECTION 33 , 10 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISI=]NS, SECTION 33 , 11 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED, (MOTION WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) ITEM NO, 8 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 33 FOR THE FIRST READING, (ACTION WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) ( CHEJ i yn 11 0 u .. i. -:, z gRizjoNP `pity o &47gache 09unctian APACHE JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT March 24, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: William E . McDaniel , Director Dept. of Public Safety , i SUBJECT: Recorder-Logger Bid opening this date Pursuant to the advertised "Call For Bids" and the specifications contained therein for the Recorder-Logger equipment for the police department, I have reviewed the one bid received from the Dictaphone Corporation and found it to be in compliance with all specifications. Bids were also solicited from Magnasync/Moviola Corp of North Hollywood, California and Stancil-Hoffman Corp. of Hollywood, California. We were contacted by Stancil- Hoffman regarding a locatfion of local installers for their equipment. No communications was received from Magnasync/Moviola Corp. Neither firm later followed our notice to them for "Call For Bids" by any submission of a bid. Inasmuch as Dictaphone Corp. is a qualified bidder and within a figure which repesents that of one lower than our budgeted estimate, I recommend that the bid for the Recorder-Logger equipment for the police department be awarded to Dictaphone Corp. 11EM No. ._ �„..., .� c. ,,Z � — PU?L!C NEARING APPROVED ON / OLD L:iS;i�ciS Y FOR AGENDA OF Z/ /f. NEW BUSINESS INFO/REPORTS /r4 4 CITY MANAGER e 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 cm Z '9RiZONP `6ity o� &4rache cOunctzon BID OPENING PROJECT No. 001-80 March 24, 1980 10:00 A.M. CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM Those Present: G. Ray Lee, City Manager; Bill McDaniel , Director of Public Safety; Marlis J. Davis, Director of Administrative Services; Mercer Weiskotten, Lt. Police Department; Jimmy Eidson, Councilman; and Dick Magnuson, Dictaphone. The meeting opened at 10:00 a.m. in the City Manager's conference room. Mr. Ray Lee, City Manager, opened the first bid from Dictaphone, 120 Old Post Road, Rye, New York 10580. The bid submitted by Dictaphone of Rye, New York was as follows: a) Bidder's price proposal , in the amount of $11 ,040.00. b) Service facilities and policy statement. c) Warranty policy statement. d) Training policy statement. e) Scope of installation activity statement. f) One (1 ) set of master specifications on the Dictaphone Series 4000 system. All of the equipment to be furnished under this proposal equals or exceeds required specifications. Bid sign by: F. E. Brown Delivery to be 90 days after receipt of purchase order. There being no further bids, the meeting was closed. MAR . DAVI D' ector of Administrative Services MJD:gk 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 P4ACH� O� 1/so U ,Ilr• z it U / q,Q�Z�NP � � � C�t�JI.�C`2E cOunCt2on NOTICE CALL FOR BIDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT SEALED BIDS WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY CLERK, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, 150 N. OCOTILLO, P. O. BOX K, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 UNTIL 10:00 A.M. , MARCH 24, 1980, FOR THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY: 1. ONE 10 CHANNEL DUAL TRANSPORT RECORDER/LOGGER 2. ONE AUTOMATIC GAIN CONTROL 3. ONE HIGH SPEED TIME READER W/DISPLAY, BATTERY & CRYSTAL OSCILLATOR 4. ONE HIGH SPEED AUTO SEARCH TIME READER 5. ONE TRANSPARENT PLASTIC DOOR WITH LOCK 6. FORTY REELS OF RECORDING TAPE 7. HEAD DEMAGNETIZER AND CLEANING KIT 8, BULK TAPE ERASER ALL INSTALLATION AND 1 YEAR PARTS AND LABOR WARRANTY TO BE INCLUDED, THE EQUIPMENT ITEMS ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND ANY REFERENCE TO ANY MANUFACT- URE IS ONLY TO ALLUDE TO THIS CONCEPT. ALL VENDORS WITH QUALIFIED EQUIP- MENT WILL BE CONSIDERED QUALIFIED BIDDERS. VENDORS MUST BE ABLE' TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO APACHE JUNCTION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTICE OF ANY EQUIPMENT FAIL- URE ON A MONDAY-FRIDAY BASIS. DELIVERY TO BE IN 60 DAYS. THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS AND TO ACCEPT THE BID DETERMINED TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ALL BIDS ARE TO BE SEALED AND MARKED "RECORDING EQUIPMENT BID DPS 001-80" AND SENT TO THE CITY CLERK, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, P. 0. BOX K, 150 N. OCOTILLO ST. , APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220. ALL BIDDERS WILL BE NOTIFIED BY MAIL OF THE RESULTS OF THE BIDDING. BIDS WILL BE OPENED AT 10:00 A.M, ON MONDAY, MARCH 24, 1980 AT THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY HALL, 150 N. OCOTILLO, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. C--- -.4-e' e4P 04: .!%, 4t...,e ISABEL C. BALLARD, CMC CITY CLERK NUMBER OF PUBLICATIONS: 5 DATES OF PUBLICATIONS: MARCH 13, THRU MARCH 17, 1980 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: CJS SECONDED BY : `--72 ...1 - YFS NO , ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE BID FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, PROJECT NO, 001-80 DPS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $11, 040, 00 BE AND IS HEREBY AWARDED TO DICTAPHONE, 120 OLD POST ROAD, RYE, NEW YORK 10580 AS THE RESPON- SIBLE BIDDER, FOR APPROVAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : - ) YES ^.Q ABSTAIN , COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED } TOTAL: ^, ) ITEM NO, 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE BID FOR THE DPEARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, PROJECT NO. 001-80 DPS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,040.00 RECEIVED FROM DICTAPHONE, 120 OLD POST ROAD, RYE, NEW YORK 10580, BE AND IS HEREBY DENIED, FOR DENIPL CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Asso ��j REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: L —„% CY,,2—ze"--"-c9— DATE: F/ � ADDRESS: 10'// .�,t'z, ! ms-CL- f —At__ AGENDA ITEM: 99, ( HE4 0 _ s z 44)/zo p. c6ity O7 C pache &unction March 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY CLERK THRU: CITY MANAGER FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: BOARD OF APPEALS In the course of performing building inspections some disagreements have arisen in regard to code interpretations and construction methods. To date these matters have been resolved within the building department. But it is inevitable that a condition may arise that will need to be arbitrated. Therefore, it is requested that the Board of Appeals be formed, as an extension to the Board of Adjustment, in accordance with the resolution attached. cc: Building Department Planning Department Attach: ITEM No. ... APPROVED ON 1 7/p P ^'" !1E,�,RING ,/ {_ ;U ?i ESS FOR AGENDA OF �`/,p�/�� ,_... 1"--- NEW BUSINESS ._._.., INFO/REPORTS CITY MANAGER 7- 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)962-6154 01.4 ,'area 25, 1980 '12+0ANDU TO: CITY CLERK i_rTTL CITY MANAGER 7P0M• DEPARTMENT OF 9ThLIC WORKS SLTEJECT• BOARD OF APPEALS In the course of performing^_, building inspections some disagreements have arisen in regars to code interpretations and construction methods. To date these matters have been resolved within the huildlne :loaartrnent. But it is inevitable that a condition may arise that will need to be arbitrated. Therefore, it #$ requested that the Board of Appeals he formed„a&:,IWezttension to the Board of. Adjustment, in accordance with the resolution attachdd. cc: Building Department Planning Department Attach: RESOLUTION NO. ,S(( / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF APACHE JUNCTION _ CREATING A BOARD OF APPEALS PURSUANT TO SECTION 204 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1979 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY REFERENCE WHEREAS, the City Council of Apache Junction did on June 27, 1979 adopt by reference the Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition as the Building Code for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona and WHEREAS, Section 204 of the Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition does create a Board of Appeals whose purpose shall be to pass upon all matters pertaining to building construction; and WHEREAS, Section 204 of said Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition does provide that members of the Board of Appeals shall consist of members who are qualified by experience and training to pass upon such matters and that the Building Official shall be an ex officio member of said Board and shall act as Secretary of said Board and that the Members of said Board shall be appointed by the City Council ; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that to satisfy the provisions of the Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition, the Apache Junction Board of Adjustments be and is hereby designated to hear all cases which would come before the Board of Appeals and to sit as the Board of Appeals, established pursuant to Section 204 of the Uniform Building Code, 1979 Edition. DATED this day of , 1980. Mayor ATTEST City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: aL City Attorney ROLL CALL. VOTE SHEET NOTES ‘. -1e e4, - (V, > 44f#4,3, ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: --) _ YF& NO ABSTAIN C-ett E s s - COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN t/ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 10 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO, 80-11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT RESOLUTION NO, 80-11, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF APACHE JUNCTION CREATING A BOARD OF APPEALS PURSUANT TO SECTION 204 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1979 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY REFERENCE, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED, FOR APPROVAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : -- ) YFS Nf] ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN 3URGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN t UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 1D CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO, 80-11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA,THAT RESOLUTION NO, 80-11, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF APACHE JUNCTION CREATING A BOARD OF APPEALS PURSUANT TO SECTION 204 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1979 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY REFERENCE, BE AND IS HEREBY DENIED, FOR DENIAL PQpCHF✓Gti APIZoNP amity 94pache 09unction March 28, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Bill McDaniel , Director of Public Safety �', SUBJECT: Vehicle Loan Agreement The Arizona Department of Public Safety is capable of providing loan vehicle service and it is a desirous method in which our department of Public Safety will use these vehicles for under- cover investigative purposes. I respectfully request that the Mayor and City Council pass Resolution Number 80-12 with a unanimous vote, making the resolution effective immediately. 2/ AP �� 3 - z � a� s�! l ' � _ Z Ord :max YE"'�? *i= % FOR AGa N!.\\ �........, NEW BUSINESS INFO/REPORTS C111 MANAGER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 RESOLUTION NO. 80-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA TO ENTER INTO A VEHICLE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO PROVIDE FOR LOAN VEHICLES ON A ROTATIONAL BASIS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction, a municipal corporation, must begin to provide full-time police services to the City and its residents on or before May 1 , 1980; WHEREAS, the Arizona Department of Public Safety is capable of providing loan vehicle services to the Department of Public Safety, City of Apache Junction; WHEREAS, the City is desirous of obtaining loan vehicles on a rotational basis for law enforcement purposes and the Arizona Department of Public Safety is desirous of providing said services and equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Department of Public Safety of Apache Junction, Arizona, be and he is authorized and directed to enter into an agreement entitled Vehicle Loan Agreement between the Department of Public Safety of the City of Apache Junction and the Arizona Department of Public Safety for the aforementioned loan vehicles. FURTHER RESOLVED that the Department of Public Safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona be and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute any documents which may be necessary to implement said agreement. WHEREAS, the immediate operation of the provisions of this resolution is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this resolution shall be in full force and effect from, and after its passage, by the City Council as required by the City Council . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona this day of , 1980. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ,21°. �23/s ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: K-D__ SECONDED BY : YFS NO ARSTA T N -GO U N Ct tMAN-BITI 'GE'SS - COUNCILMAN DAMIANO r/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 11 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO, 80-12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO, 80-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, TO ENTER INTO A VEHICLE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO PROVIDE FOR LOAN VEHICLES ON A ROTATIONAL BASIS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED , FOR APPROVAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES N0 .ABSTAIN , COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 80-12, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,PINAL COUNCTY, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, TO ENTER INTO A VEHICLE LOAN AGREEMTNT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY TO PROVIDE FOR LOAN VEHICLES ON A ROTATIONAL BASIS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND IS HEREBY DENIED FOR DENIAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : YFS NO ABSTAI) �1 , C LMAN BURGESS _.__-. COUNCILMAN DAM IANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS z. VICE-MAYOR GRAN' LLO Lr. MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVISE, BE HELD ON THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980, AT 6:00 P,M, V --. 7)-"a97-'6-. -�� ,77 -?r71-7Y R-9 7,?-& _ 147P I T'A 'v/ ,77'*44 a7D62( 12-241,A J �l% � "27 6'v(// ! &LI) Copper State Bank 2600 W.APACHE TRAIL,APACHE JUNCTION,AZ 85220 • TELEPHONE 982.0600 ROBERT E. DeBOW PRESIDENT AND BOARD CHAIRMAN March 17, 1980 Mr. Ray Lee, Manager City of Apache Junction Post Office Box K Apache Jct, Az 85220 Dear Ray: It was with a great deal of pleasure that I have read the first copy of "NEWS From Your CITY". Virginia Seeman dropped one off on my desk this very day and also left a num- ber of copies in the lobby to be distributed to the public. The articles will do more for the image of you people at Town Hall than anything that I have seen in the form of releases in the newspaper or any other media since Apache Junction became a city. Obviously, a great deal of effort and care- ful planning went into this news letter and I know that, properly distributed, the com- munity will, for the first time, have an op- portunity to review the facts as they are. Looking forward to the next issu-, R'iB" DeBOW CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS ACTION NOT COMPLETED MEETING ACTION DATE RFQUFST AGENCY STATUS 9/19/79 THAT RESOLUTON NO. 79-37, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND City Action THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZ. Manager/ contingent RELATING TO THE APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, BE City upon City's ADOPTED TO SET ASIDE A ONE-HALF ACRE PARCEL OF LAND WITH- Clerk acquistion IN THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PARCEL FOR THE USE OF THE CHAM- of approx. BER OF COMMERCE 100 acres of lands from State land dept. 11/21/79 THAT THE RESOLUTION NO. 79-45, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR City Grant AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL Manager/ awarded; COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER Director bids INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS- of Public currently PORTATION, OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, FOR FUNDING OF A Safety being TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT UNIT AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT COMMUNICA- accepted. TIONS FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND DECLARING AND EMERGENCY , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. 11/21/79 THAT THE RESOLUTION NO. 79-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR City Grant AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL Manager/ application COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER Planning submitted INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS- Director 3/20/80. PORTATION, OFFICE OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, FOR FUNDING OF STREET NAME AND OTHER STREET SIGNS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. 1/16/80 COUNCILMAN HILL REQUESTED THE STAFF TO PREPARE AN AMEND- Public On agenda MENT TO THE 1979 PLUMBING CODE TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIRE- Works/ for 4/2/80 MENT OF A THREE INCH STACK. Bldg. Insp , meeting. 3/5/80 THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-6, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND City Holding for CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SUPPORTING Manager/ the Chamber THE TIMELY EXTENSION OF THE SUPERSTITION FREEWAY, BE AND City : of Commerce IS HERE ADOPTED Clerk petitions 3/5/80 THAT THE RESIGNATIONS OF MR. THERON D. ADAMS AND MR. Director Accepting, ARTHUR STRANGE FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION of Admin. Talent BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AND FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Services/ Bank Applic- TWO (2) OFFICES ON THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION BE Planning ations . AND ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE VACANT, SAID OFFICES TO Director HAVE TERMS THAT EXPIRE ON JUNE 30, 1982. 3/5/80 COUNCILMAN EIDSON REQUESTED THAT A LETTER OR A CERTIFI- City On agenda CATE IN APPRECIATION OF SERVING ON THE P & Z COMMISSION Clerk for 4/2/80 BE SENT TO MR. THERON D. ADAMS AND MR. ARTHUR STRANGE. meeting. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS Meeting of March 19_1 1980 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT ITEM NO. 12 BE AND IS HEREBY REMOVED FROM THE -0- TABLE THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 5, -0- 1980, BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 10, -0- 1980, BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDS APPROVAL TO THE City Being ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THE QUALIFIED ENDORSE- Clerk implemented. MENT OF THE GOLD DUST MOBILE HOME RESORT "SMALL GAME" BINGO LICENSE TO BE CONDUCTED AT THE GOLD DUST MOBILE HOME RESORT, 202 N. MERIDIAN ROAD IN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. THE QUALIFIED ENDORSE- MENT IS THAT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE BINGO GAMES WILL OCCUR SHALL NOT HAVE MOTOR VEHICLES PARKED IN THE VICINTY OF SAID BUILDING IN A MANNER THAT THE VEHICLES' PRESENCE WOULD BECOME A HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE. THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 36 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE OR- -0- DINANCE BE WAIVED. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 36, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF City Published and APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 BY Clerk posted 3/26/80. ADDING ARTICLE 2-7 ESTABLISHING A LIBRARY BOARD PURSUANT TO ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 9, CHAP- TER 4, ARTICLE 2; PROVIDING THE REPEAL OF CONFLICT- ING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 37, BE READ -0- BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 37, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF City Published and APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 BY Clerk posted 3/26/80. ADDING ARTICLE 2-9 ESTABLISHING AN AIRPORT COMMIS- SIO(N, PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMISSION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 38 BE READ BY TITL -0- ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. CITY COUNCIL ;LOTIONS ,teeting of _March 19, 1980 _ ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT ORDINANCE NO. 38, AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON City Published COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Clerk and posted AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 13-2, APACHE JUNCTION 3/26/80. CITY CODE, BY ADDING SECTION 13-2-3 PERTAINING TO STREET IMPROVEMENTS, THE ADOPTION OF STREET CLASSIFI- CATION PLAN, REQUIRING THE DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION BY REFERENCE THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATION, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, PROVID- ING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 39 BE READ BY -0- TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING Of THE ENTIRE ORD- INANCE BE WAIVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 39, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF City Published and APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ADDING ARTICLE 2-8, PARKS Clerk posted 3/26/80. AND RECREATION COMMISSION, TO THE CITY CODE; ESTAB- LISHING THE APACHE JUNCTION PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION; PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMIS- SION AND POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION; PROVID— ING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-8, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR City Being AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, Clerk implemented. PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, ENDORSING AND ENCOURAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATION FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 40 BE READ BY TITLE -0- ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 40, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF City Published and APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING Clerk posted 3/26/80. CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-5-23, TO INCLUDE UTITLITY AND/ OR PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANIES ENGAGED IN FURNISHING GAS OR ELECTRICITY FOR LIGHT, FUEL, OR POWER, PROVID- ING FOR PENALTY CLAUSE AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND • DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-9, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY City Being OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, REQUESTING Clerk implemented. THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, UNITED STATE. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF STUDY IN PREPARATION OF ITS FLOOD IN- SURANCE RATE MAP AS IT RELATES TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS Meeting of March 19, 1980 _ ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND City Posted 3/24/80 LEGAL ADVICE, BE HELD ON THE 2nd DAY OF APRIL, 1980, Clerk AT 6:00 P.M. THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MARCH 27, 1980, AT City Posted 3/24/80 7:00 P.M. FOR THE PURPOSE OF STUDYING THE BUSINESS Clerk LICENSE. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO CON- City Resolution DUCT A STUDY INTO THE FEASIBILITY OF FORMALLY DECLARING Manager/ 80-10 on CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ZONE OF INFLUENCE, TO INSURE Planning Agenda of THE FUTURE PROTECTION OF ALL CITY RESIDENTS. Director 4/2/80. THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8: 15 P.M. -0- CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING OF March 19, 1980 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION DRAFT A RESOLUTION ON THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE AS REQUESTED City On Agenda BY COUNCILMAN EIDSON. Manager/ of 4/2/80. Planning Directo PQACHE✓Gy _ /// --( 4#/zol P. V ity oe 04pache cOunctio March 18, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joe Gero, Director of Planning Executive Secretary, Board of Adjustment SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Minutes FOR YOUR INFORMATION Enclosed you will find copies of approved "MINUTES" from a recent meeting of the Board of Adjustment. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. JWG:an • iSt. NC:�;t OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • T'LEPH^NE(502) 982.5154 MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION CITY HALL March 3, 1980 .�. 7:00 p.m. In Attendance Regrets Joe Jessamine, Chairman Don Nesser, Vice Chairman Bill Furness Pete Nunn Bill Vaughn Joe Gero, Exec. Sec. Guests About 25 persons 1. Mr. Jessamine opened the meeting at 7: 10 p.m. welcoming those present and requesting the roll call of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined all five members to be present as indicated above. 3. Chairman declared that there was a quorum present at this meeting. He noted there are two sets of "Minutes" before the Board dated December 17, 1979 and February 21 , 1980. 4. Nesser/Furness /S to approve as circulated "Minutes" dated TTe-Tember 17, 1979. Motion passed by roll call vote 3-0-2 with Messers Nunn and Vaughn abstaining in that they were not at the meeting of December 17, 1979. 5. Nunn/Nesser M/S to approve as circulated "Minutes" dated Y bruary 21, 1980. Motion passed 4-0-1 by roll call vote with Mr. Jessamine abstaining in that he was not at the meeting of February 21, 1980. 6. Chairman announced the Board would take the continuance of consideration of BA-1-80, application of Carl Ely up next. He called upon the Executive Secretary to present a report. ,+►, 7. Mr. Gero stated that a further check with Pinal County Assessor's Office disclosed: 1. The 1975 date which had been given city officials is the effective date assessing the area as two separate lots (lots A & C) began. 2. The official record shows that the recording date of the lot split was September 16, 1974, tw^ ;months prior to Page 2 - Board of Adjustment Pinal County amending the CR Zoning District requirements. Clearly lots A & C were lawfully split while under County Zoning jurisdiction. 8. Mr. Jessamine noted that the public hearing was closed on February 21, 1980. To hold another public hearing would require readvertising. However, a substantial number from the neighborhood are interested in the case as shown by their attendance here. The Board would therefore, entertain questions about what has been stated. (Several minor points were clarified as to dates as previously expressed.) He then asked in view of the new information if there were persons who felt they had substantial information to present to warrant the Board advertising for another public hearing. (None was noted .) 9. Furness/Messer M/S "Be it resolved by the Board of Adjustment the City of Apache Junction, Arizona that the application of Mr. Carl Ely (BA-1-80) for his property located at N1 NZ NE SW SE NE Sec. 22, R8E, TIN G & SRB & M in Apache Junction, Az. be approved granting variances to the subject property located in a General Rural (GR) zoning district of: 1. Reduction of the 14 acre requirement to 0.625 acre less the area reserved for public right-of-way purposes. 2. Reduce one side yard minimum requirement (the one furthest from the public right- of-way) from 20 feet to 15.5 feet. 3. Reduce the minimum lot frontage from 100 feet to 49.5 feet. This motion is made in recognition that the lot is a pre-existing non-conforming lot of record in Pinal County the split being recorded September 16, 1974 in conformance with the then existing Zoning Ordinance requirements. Further, the lot is of record July 1, 1979 as required by the Apache Junction, Arizona Zoning Ordinance." The motion passed by 4-1 by roll call vote with /+l Mr. Nunn voting negative based on the fact the neighborhood is opposed to the request. 10. Chairman allowed a five minute recess at about 7:45 to discuss with the neighborhood the particulars of zoning principles. 11. Chairman noting the Board was again in session stated that the next item would be the public hearing for Page 3 - Board of Adjustment case BA-2-80, application of Gerald Pancheri, Trustee in behalf of Apache Junction Mobile Home Park requesting certain variances of the Trailer Homesite Zoning District be applied to the said mobile home park in accordance with Section 2309 of the Zoning Ordinance in that the Park is pre- existing and non-conforming to the City Zoning Ordinance but had either approvals for certain areas by Pinal County Planning or existed prior to Zoning Enforcement by Pinal County. Applicant stipulates that the variances requested are as depicted in exhibits "A" through "E" attached to the application. The case was advertised on February 23, 1980. He then called upon the Executive Secretary to brief the Board and public present on the case. 12. Mr. Gero oriented the case on a sketch map for all present. He noted that: 1. A major portion of the park was over twenty years old. 2. The remainder was approved for con- struction by Pinal County approximately two years ago. 3. Depicted on sketches the existing Mobile Home Park requirements of the City. Although they are the sane as those adopted by Pinal County, the approved area cannot meet the requirements in all regards. 13. Mr. Pancheri stated that he is among the owners of the property subject to the application. He reiterated the facts as stated above. Without the variances, the entire mobile home park would not be in con- formance. He requested approval for all the lots within the park. 14. Board determined that the Apache Junction Mobile Home Park could not comply in its present layout, including the rear setbacks. 15. Nesser/Vaughn M/S "Be it resolved by the Board of Adjustment UT—the City of Apache Junction, Arizona that in case BA-2-80, application of Gerald Pancheri, requesting approval of certain variances hereinafter, to be specified within the Apache Junction Mobile Home Park, identified as Parcel #8 on Pinal County Assessor's Map 101-11 located in Apache Junction, Arizona and being approximately 17.5 acres on this date that the requested variances as stipulated in applicants Exhibits "A" through "E" be approved for the Apache Junction Mobile Home Park; further providing that no habitable living area or other main building in said park be located closer than Page 4 - Board of Adjustment twenty (20) feet to another habitable living area or main building within said park, further provided that the applicant shall submit to the Apache Junction Department of Planning no later than March 17, 1980 any existing locations where the twenty (20) feet of separation does exist that such exceptions shall be approved to the degree of the currently existing separations; further provided that the applicant will not permit the replacement of a non-conforming mobile home with another non-conforming mobile home the placement of which would exceed the variances as specified herein." The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 16. Board called a work session for March 17, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. or after any business that might be scheduled to discuss Board procedures. 17. Board adjourned at 9: 10 p.m. there being no further business on the agenda. Respectfully submitted; l Joseph W. Gero Executive Secretary Approved; Joe Jessamine Chairman • PQACHE✓G2 , x Z •V``' �it o�{ @ /" ache 2unction March 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joseph W. Gero, Director of Planning JW SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Meeting Times Change -For your information- At the last meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission they approved unanimously changing their meeting time from the second and fourth Monday to the second Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. Other meetings would be called as per Chapter 11 "Planning and Zoning Commission." (See 11-1-5 "Meetings") This was done to facilitate the schedules of all members. Their intention is that the Monday, April 14 meeting be the last Monday meeting. They would continue with their heavy schedule due to the workload by announcing in advance the other meetings. Special business meetings could be posted. If an item required a public hearing, there must be compliance with special notice requirements. The staff will be publishing and posting notice of the change. JWG/an r7A4 My. APPROVED ON ,6 7. 44 _____ OLD CU S'i 4ESS FOR AGENDA OF.I. g ..._..__✓___ NEW BUSINESS ..4-A- __A INFO/REPORTS CITY MANAGER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 PQACHE�Gy O o O �d: Z ox gR,zoN � p i� ache &unction °� C March 20, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joe Gero, Director of Planning Executive Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Minutes • FOR YOUR INFORMATION Enclosed you will find copies of approved "MINUTES" from a recent meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. Please have the original "Minutes" inserted in the "minutes" book. Thank you. I JWG:an APPROVED GV tTE # AIo, .__•___ ..�/'�-��' PUBLIC HEARING FOR AGENDA OF OLD BUSINESS _ •--- - NEW BUSINESS ...._.... .------_- ._.., INFO/ REPORTS CITY MANAGER ISO NORTH OCOTILLO • POST()RICE Box K.APAC}If IISPICTION.ARCONIA PA,VO • ;ELEP1ioNE(642)952-615: MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ..] CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION February 25, 1980 7:00 p.m. In Attendance Regrets Mr. Baljo, Chairman Mr. Adams Mrs. Baker Mr. Hudson Mr. 0ltman Mr. Strange Ms. Sharp Mr. Strickler Mr. Gero, Exec. Sec. Mrs. Taylor Mrs. Nunn, Sec. Guests Approximately 25 persons including Mayor Virginia Seeman and Councilman Tom Damiano. 1. Mr. Baljo opened the meeting at 7: 10 p.m. and requested the (Chairman) roll-call of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined members as indicated (Exec. Sec.) above to be present. He noted that Messers Adams and Strange have submitted letters of resignation citing health reasons among others. Mr. Hudson I had indicated illness, Mr. Strickler had called in and indicated his employer had called him out this evening, and Mrs. Taylor had a previously arranged meeting and could not make other arrangements. 3. Mr. Baljo declared that no quorum was present and therefore no action could be taken by the Commission. 4. Commission adjourned the formal meeting at 7:45 p.m. for lack of quorum. Respectfully Submitted: Joseph W. Gero Executive Secretary Approved: • i George B jo, C air Fri MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION March 10, 1980 7:00 p.m. In Attendance Regrets Mr. Baijo, Chairman Mrs. Baker (illness) Mr. Oltman Mr. Hudson (business) Ms. Sharp Mr. Strickler (business) Mrs. Taylor Mr. Gero, Exec. Sec. Mrs. Nunn, Sec. Guests 9 persons 1. Mr. Baijo opened the meeting at 7:05 p.m. and requested (Chairman) the roll-call of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined members as indicated above to be present. He noted the City Council has accepted the letters of resignation from Messers .�. Adams and Strange. Mrs. Baker called in and indicated illness while Messers Hudson and Strickler have business/job commitments. 3. Mr. Baijo declared that no quorum was present and therefore no action could be taken by the Commission. 4. Mr. Howell Anderson made a brief informal presentation as to what he is seeking as rezoning in Pinal County. He indicated he would be able to be present Tuesday, March 18 at 7:00 p.m. 5. Mr. Haze Burch attorney for Mr. Halbert requested the Commission make an advisory motion establishing a new time and place for the public hearing. He suggested it is common practice to carry over to the next meeting an advertised hearing when no quorum is present. He would not object to such an action by motion to be contingent to approval of the City Attorney as to procedure. 6. Sharp/Oltman M/S that rezoning case PZ-4-80, application of • Marvin Halbert for Gold Dust Mobile Home Park to establish initial zoning having been annexed, be continued to Tuesday March 18, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. in this same location, the motion to be contingent upon a report from the City Attorney that such action is permissible without a quorum. Otherwise, the case will have to be readvertised. The motion passed unanimously by those present. Page 2 - Planning and Zoning 7. Commission lacking a quorum adjourned at 8: 15 p.m. Respectfully submitted; QiW Josep W. Gero Executive Secretary Approved; eoerro Chairman 1 • MINUTES PLANNING AND• ZONING COMMIS$ION CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION JANUARY 14, 1980 In attendance Regrets Mr. George Baljo, Chairman Mr. Roy Hudson Mr. Theron Adams Mr. Sims Strickler (illness) Mrs. Mildred Baker Ms. Susan Sharp Mr. Art Strange, V. Chmn. Mr. Joe Gero, Executive Secretary Mrs. Althea Nunn, Secretary 1. Mr. Baljo Called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and requested Chairman the Executive Secretary to call the roll of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined that six (6) of th- Exec. Sec. eight (8) members of the Planning and Zoning Commission were present as indicated above. 3. Chairman declared a quorum present. 4. Commission M/S to approve as circulated, "Minutes" dated January 3, 1980. Motion passed 6-0. 5. Chairman announced that this is the advertised Public Hearing on PZ-12-79, a request by Mrs. Hazel Lawther. He re- quested the Executive Secretary to brief those present. 6. Executive indicated that this is PZ-12-79, a request to change Secretary approximately 39,000 square feet of property from General Rural (GR) to Multiple Family Residence (CR5) which would allow approximately 20 units of as many bedrooms as desired and questioned if the Planning and Zoning Commission should endorse this density. He indic- ated he thought that in general concepts this was probably a good location for multiple family by planned development. 7. Mr. Lawther spoke in behalf of his wife. He indicated that the dimensions on the easterly side were off slightly and that the parcel is not quite as large as shown on the easel sketch. He indicated they definitely would follow all requirements, that they originally owned . 30 acres in that area and have developed most of it. No definite plan has yet been done indicating how many units, etc. will be placed on the parcel. Minutes Page 2 8. Chairman asked if anyone wished to speak in favor or opposition. No one came forth. Chairman then called for questions from the Planning and Zoning members. 9. Mr. Strange questioned if the smaller lot would cut down on the density and was advised by the Executive Secretary that it would allow about 18 units, rather than the 20 units. 10. Mr. Lawther responding to a question from the Executive Secretary stated time is of the essence because of unexpected delays in the building industry, but they tA11 wait several months if really necessary. 11. Chairman explained the Planned Development concept and reason for asking the applicants to wait, including benefits to the applicant, city, and surrounding land owners. 12. Oltman/Strange M/S to continue the public hearing on PZ-12-79 until suit time and place as stated by the Executive Secretary or applicant. Motion passed unanimously. 13. Chairman asked Executive Secretary to present case PZ-6-79 (Mr. Deane, applicant) . 14. Executive gave presentation on request PZ-6-79. He brought out Secretary that should one drive on Tomahawk south it will intersect with the proposed freeway and with Highway 1 60 just to the north. Adjacent uses are industrial, vacant, or an RV park. 15. Chairman asked the Planning and Zoning Commission if they had questions of Mr. Deane. Inquiry was made about proposed use, Mr. Deane advised he would like to use it for trailer repairs. 16. Adams/Baker M/S "I move that in case //PZ-6-79, application of Mr. Frank Deane, owner of the parcel described as the West 200 feet of the N 188.62 feet of the E 1156.34 feet of the NE 1/4 of SE 1/4, Sec. 28, TIN, R8E, G & SRB & M located in Pinal County, Arizona, and common- ly referred to as 1310 E. 17th Avenue in Apache Junction, Arizona, be recommended to the City Council for a zone change from General Rural (GR) to Light Industrial (CI-1) for the reasons given below. The subject site lies within an area bounded by Weeks Wash (west) , industrially zoned properties and dev • - eloping as such (south) , undeveloped properties (east and partially north) and a R-V park on the north. Further, the general area has Tomahawk Road to the east and Highway 60 just to the north. The general area has barriers to other areas, thereby defining a neighborhood area. Minutes Page 3 1. The industrial use would be a continuation of existing industrial uses. 2. Access via Hondo to Tomahawk would place industrial traffic on the major north-south street which could connect to either Highway 60 or proposed Superstition freeway via only major routes. 3. Land adjacent to flood plains can often be better utilized for industrial purposes due to building techniques and reducing family concentrations in such areas. 17. Chairman announced that Pinal County is requesting a recommendation on case #PZ-597-79 for rezoning within three (3) miles of City limits. 18. Executive briefed Commission PZ-597-79 (Pinal County) an Secretary application by Irby Cain for rezoning from General Rural (GR) to Trailer Homesite (TH) and General Commercial (CB-2) of 80 acres at the southwest corner of Vineyard and the proposed Superstition Freeway. 19. Carl Weckerly explained the CB-2 (approximately 20 acres) is being (agent for changed to CB1 at the request of Pinal County. Charles applicant) Johnson of Weckerly's staff stated approximately 60 acres would be zoned trailer parks and the spaces will be approximately 52' x 80' . 20. Executive inquired as to the proposed width of Vineyard ad- Secretary jacent to the park? What type of fencing would be around the park? What would be the source of water, and what flow rate will it be supplied? What are plans for fire hydrants? Is there flooding or sub- sidence in the area? 21. Applicants replied Az. Water has just brought new well in that same area. Negotiations are progressing to obtain water services to the park. In reference to access, there will be fence or wall around park with "crash" gates. Easement will be provided as required - prob- able 33' right-of-way on South and West sides. Fire hydrants will be located on site as required, and will be serviced either by Rural Metro or Apache Junction Fire District. One large wash will be conveyed around the park. Fencing will be provided around the park. 22. Executive gave statistics on vacancies in Trailer Parks in Secretary Apache Junction of at least 2916 total spaces (RV and Mobile Home) only 2294 are occupied. Mobile Home parks are 94% full and parks in general are 78% occupied. Additionally, nearly 118 acres in Apache Minutes Page 4 22. continued Junction are zpned for mobile home parks, a potential for 1175 spaces or if RV's 1645 potential spaces. In addition, within a few miles of the City are approximately 200 acres zoned TH; 2000 additional potential mobile home spaces, 2800 potential spaces if RV's, or a combination of both. There is the potential of doubling the number of available spaces already zoned for RV's or mobile home parks. We must be prudent in the amount of area zoned for trailer parks. The rezoning would be inappropriate from an environmental point of view, in that the Freeway will carry huge amounts of traffic. Due to the hydro- carbon emissions, light, and sound pollution areas adjacent to freeways are not acceptable environments for residential use. Based on the above, he suggested the Commission recommend denial of this request. 23. Strange/Baker M/S to recommend denial as per the attached recommendation to Pinal County. The motion passed unanimously. 24. Executive gave presentation of PZ-1-80,Pinal County, requested by Secretary James Copeman to rezone 40 acres from General Rural (GR) to Heavy Industrial (CI-2) zoning in Pinal County within three (3) miles of Apache Junction. 25. John Barber stated he is representing Mr. Copeman. Mr. Copeman wants to take various ores from mines he is working in the Superstition Mountain and store them on this land until enough is collected to take the ore to the smelter in Superior. This is low grade ore, and would need zoning for storage of rocks, soil, etc. This is entirely surrounded by State land, and would not be fenced. The site is approximately 1/4 mile to Baseline on the south. Gold, silver, copper and tur- quoise will be the main ore types. There could be a possibility of other uses than stockpiling, as it is 40 acres, including other industrial purposes. 26. Sharpe/Adams M/S to recommend approval to County Board of Supervisors as per attached recommendation. Motion passed unanimously. 27. Chairman inquired as to status of Mr. Schusters application. 28. Executive informed the Commission he and Mr. Schuster had dis- Secretary cussed this matter and that without further communication from Mr. Schuster the matter should be postponed. Minutes Page 5 29. Adams/Baker M/S to postpone. Motion carried unanimously. 30. Chairman announced the next item is AJ-1-79 the requested annexation of Apache Junction schools into the City of Apache Junction. 31. Executive outlined area and reasons for prepared annexation. Secretary Reasons are: 1. Schools service Apache Junction citizens. 2. Desire to use facilities for official meetings; it is not permitted to hold City meetings out- side the City limits. 32. Chairman asked for comments from the Commission. 33. Strange/0ltman M/S to recommend annexation. Motion passed unanimously. 34. Executive re: address forms - will make out new list of members Secretary to be circulated soon. re: Advisory/Planning and Zoning meetings every Tuesday night at 7 p.m. to work on ordinances. 35. Members agreed that this will be beneficial, also that all members would not be able to be at each meeting. 36. Chairman entertained a motion to adjourn. 37. Adams/Baker M/S to adjourn at 9:10 p.m. Nation passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted Josep W. Gero Executive Secretary Approved: "fri Ar George ljo, haiy.an k RECOMMENDATION PZ-597-79 (Pinal County) Irby Cain, Applicant That in Pinal County Case 11PZ-597-79, application of Irby Cain, owner of the parcel described as N1/2, SEA, Sec. 31, TIN, R8E, G&SRB&M, Pinal County, Arizona that the City of Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the Pinal County Board of Supervisors the denial of the proposed rezoning from General Rural (GR) to Trailer Homesite (TH) and General Business 2 (CB-2) as per attached map. The reasons are: 1. The intersection of Superstition Freeway and Ironwood will be the main entrance to the City of Apache Junction upon the com- pletion of the Freeway. Realizing that zoning districts should establish in principle present and future land uses, trailer homesite zoning is inappropriate for this major transportation route. 2. The present and future economic health of the County and City require planned areas be established where jobs can be created. There is a substantial population in Apache Junction which is directly to the north of the subject area. Through established zoning it would be difficult to create industrial areas suitable for industrial parks within areas of the City where utility services and transportation might also be provided while giving due consideration to environmental questions. Incidently, the City has requested the County study this general area for establishing industrial zoning. 3. Locations adjacent to Freeways are proving unfit living environ- ments due to auto emissions, noise, glare, etc. 4. There are currently no plans or agreements for fire services or water services to the site. 5. During the first week of January 1980, the City of Apache Junction surveyed mobile home parks/R.V. parks and determined the following: a. There are at least 2916 total spaces (R.V. & Mobile home) in Apache Junction. • b. At least 2264 spaces are occupied. c. Percent occupancies are approximately: Overall == 78% Mobile home parks = 94% Recreations) vehicles = undetermined This indicates a possible weakness in the R.V. industry r:srAC HE ✓o UK Z 'Dit o @ ache unction 'lRizONP p March 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY CLERK THRU: CITY MANAGER FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: COUNCIL REQUEST 1/16/80 (PLUMBING STACK) The request by Councilman Hill to prepare an amendment to the 1979 plumbing code to eliminate the requirement of a three inch plumbing stack is not required as explained in a memo to Councilman Hill on ?/28/80. (copy attached) Please remove this item from the City Council request list which shows this as action not completed. cc: Building Department City Council Attach: /3 - I u8 lrBUSINESS i.� NDA CF 1 . G NEVI CIJSiNt�a 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-6154 March 25, 19°0 ?-!E 4ORANI)UM TO: CITY CLERK TE U: CITY MANACER FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: COUNCIL REQUEST 1/1C/30 (PLUMBING STACK) The request by Councilman pill to prepare an amendment to the 1979 plumbing code to eliminate the requirement of a three inch plumbing stack is not required as explained in a memo to Councilman 11111 on 2428,-`8O. (copy attached) Please remove this item from the City Council request list which shows this as action not completed. cc: Building Department City Council Attach: DIRECTOR O To Czi.,/,__e_4_)&41..„C-7 YvL� ` O ` 21 g FOLLOW UP COPY G��' ' N\in 1 0•L r 1 v ' 1:,- _ .rye, - F— R7 4#1Z0N' V it # o icpacke &unction ofieN DATE: February 28, 1980 TO: Councilman Norman Hill THRU: Richard Broman, Director of Public Works ' FROM: Leo Frazier, Building Official & Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Request to eliminate a section of the ICB0, 1979 Edition The requirement for the full-sized vent has been eliminated in discovering that the Department has been using the ICB0, 1979 Edition when the City Code had actually adopted the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1979 Edition. Attached are copies of the pertinent information relating to vent sizing from each of the above-mentioned codes. LF:SW Attach: 3 150 NORTH OCOnLLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982.6154 r... 44 UNIFORM PLUMBING COD: 45 �.�•�ANO VENTING tt,•,r . 00 0 0 A 7 •.s r Nd 00 °i w I- • "'Q d N 0 D X t M (per an q e O C C " Y • > 0 00 c °1 c • ^1•• 0� °co c 7� L f` 00 c`) in d v, c n m ,Y•.: •a N 00 0 ,,t E t . con) 0d 0 c0 0000 .)" « 0 VD tD 1n N LID lf)N o f x c . r ^ C N MN N N Mr-,CV z E p 0, 41 N C �t 00 Ln rn to E �z CHAPTER 5 m �" `n r, g N a VENTS AND VENTING atio ^ ko E 0 E 501 — Vents Required i.VO00 0 E let , A 'r'� oN ON °-° orn00 $ ;, 8 �; Exn plumbing fixture trap, except as otherwise provided in this • t0 d M -� tD M.-. .t ` ;,o d ` shall he protected against siphonage and back pressure, and o tD tOtD o - o:• 0 ,,rculation shall be assured throughout all parts of the drainage ,C d0 in^" o N tOON o E a\o {I►trnt by means of vent pipes installed in accordance with the tti �a -y `""' o, voo, o e `- „ ,,,ements of this chapter and as otherwise required by this Code ry rf --J Y c c=1 Sec 502 — Vents Not Required i. - d E M N aoin N N� a°c_°5 '. (,1 ►there permitted by the Administrative Authority, vent piping J E N. `r`� N coo N l S N n d r' ,.,�, be omitted on an interceptor when such interceptor acts as a a S ` p,�•,,ry settling tank and discharges through a horizontal indirect i• I- 1a Nt ^ a o o ,`z, raper. pipe into a secondary interceptor The second interceptor r, M . a0 d a t : o,• , be properly trapped and vented w'. N tO '" .tt �'"`r' e"D o S %+ rt i Traps serving sinks which are part of the equipment of bars, a. ,'�a tountains and counters, need nut be vented when the location c No •;ao co dog A E am ronstruchon of such bars, soda fountains and counters is such 1n N •(NI o.d �t, t,, make it impossible to do so When such conditions exist saic a . 0 „ ' E „='ynks shall discharge by means of approved indirect waste pipes into -, N ! 3 w ai °o, I'is A lour sink or other approved type receptor. � `v'~ U0°' oo •-° d `g t;�c 503 — Materials A<<8 tat Vent pipe shall be cast• iron, galvanized steel, galvanized r E d� N_ 3 k „ , ,gbt iron, lead, copper, brass, ABS, PVC or other approved E .�, • -~-" in M ; A L d i materials, except Tc r`' `f '"`r-. o'd v v '_' I That no galvanized wrought iron or galvanized steel pipe shall V,II L 5 i; ; �4'be used underground and shall be kept at least six (6) inches 1 in 'o °N ii E c '41(152 4 mm) above ground 2 ABS or PVC installations limited to .... ° •• A;o ,o ` c k 3 residential construction, not more than two (2) stories in height c E . N i5 r o c c• (b) Vent fittings shall be cast iron, galvanized malleable iron or •d " c > .. E 3 Fat s,,0 0 0 v'galvanized steel, lead, copper, brass, ABS, PVC, or other approved i .= Ca 000 w . L .. n c m e v d, . . v a = a� c 4, a _3 o o _lrnaterials, except that no galvanized malleable iron or galvanized co...,�a p ,o,,,E".mu, v c a Na a—?2, ac . Y ,gD , = E ;steel fittings shall be used underground and shall be Kept at least six Ecum ° �" c— E a,.,z x �"� A °i' inches (1524mm) above ground. o N '; u ,,•- c v a ao� o d Lt (c) Changes in direction of vent piping shall be made by the c o c C a o N • $ c, ro riate use of approved fittings and no such pipe shall be a) K - a1 ai - d oc � K . Kco- � cwi,apD p g pP cIV �o>= � a> 2;=E E w w wo t om 7 0° strained or bent. Burred ends shall be reamed to the full bore of the +' E. pI� 46 UNIFORM PLUMBING CG.�titti AND VENTIN 47 Sec. 504 — Size of Vents ed (a) The size of vent piping shall be determined from its lene "I" direction ipes shall be extended om any lot line, aslepaey ra sepnd arately combinreet ed,of full and the total number of fixture units connected thereto, as set for fired size, not less than six (6) inches (152 4mm)above the roof in Table 4-3 of this Code In addition, the drainage piping of ea„Iwtr except w building and each connection to a public sewer or a private sewat,�tile wallor purposels ing other than w aof vents isrtherbited protection Alheretshe th of disposal system shall be vented by means of one or more vent pipe ) feet (3m) of anypart of the roof that is used for such other the aggregate cross sectional area of which shall not be less IW' f th; ses shall extend not less than seven (7) feet (2.1 m) above that of the largest required building sewer, as determined frcr Pate Table 4 3 ouch roof and shall be securely stayed Exception. When connected to a common building sewer, it, (.di Vent pipes for outdoor installations shall extend at least ten drainage piping of two (2) or more buildings located on the swot)) reel (3m) above the surrounding ground and shall be securely lot and under one (1) ownership may be vented by means of pip„feed sized in accordance with Table 4-3, provided the aggregate Gros, lei Joints at the roof around vent pipes shall be made watertight sectional area of all vents is not less than that of the largest „b the use of approved flashings or flashing material. quired common building sewer ,q Frost or snow closure Where frost or snow closure is likely to (b) A vent may exceed one third (1/3) of the maximum ho,0cur each vent extension through a roof shall be at least three(3) zontal length as limited by Table 4-3, provided the vent is increaserncnes (76.2mm) in diameter The change in diameter shall be one (1) pipe size for its entire lengthe inside the building at least one (1) foot (0.3m) below the roof Sec 505 — Vent Pipe Grades and Connections ,i terminate not less than ten(10)inches(254mm)above the roof, (a) All vent and branch vent pipes shall be free from drops or sae, required by the Administrative Authority. and each such vent shall be level or shall be so graded and coloc 507 — Vent Stacks and Relief Vents netted as to drip back by gravity to the drainage pipe it serve. tat Each drainage stack, which extends ten (10) or more stories (b) Where vents connect to a horizontal drainage pipe,each yes,virebuilding drain or other horizontal drain, shall be served by a pipe shall be taken off above the center line of such pik, ,ailel vent stack which shall extend undiminished in size from its downstream of the trap being served r terminal and connect to the drainage stack at or immediately (c) Unless prohibited by structural conditions, each vent shall nybrio* the lowest fixture branch Each such vent stack shall also be vertically to a point not less than six (6) inches (152 4 mm) abo,wnected to the drainage stack at each fifth floor below the the flood level rim of the fixture served before offsetting horizontal!,uppermost fixture branch by means of a relief yoke vent, the size of and whenever two (2) or more vent pipes converge, each such vero,,,Kh shall be not less in diameter than either the drainage or the pipe shall rise to a point at least six (6) inches (152 4 mm) in heig.vent stack, whichever is smaller above the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture it serves befa, ft)) The yoke vent intersection with the vent stack shall be placed being connected to any other vent. When horizontal vents are le4c4 less than forty-two (42) inches (1.1m) above the floor level, and than six (6) inches (152 4mm) above the flood level rim of tt,te yoke vent intersection with the drainage stack shall be by means fixture, the horizontal portion shall be installed with approved a wye' branch fitting placed below the fixture branch serving that drainage material. floor (d) All vent pipes shall extend undiminished in size above tt, roof, or shall be reconnected with a soil or waste vent of proper sit, (e) The vent pipe opening from a soil or waste pipe, except h, water closets and similar fixtures, shall not be below the weir of tt, trap (f) Two (2) fixtures may be served by a common vent pipe whe• each such fixture wastes separately into an approved double fittiit having inlet openings at the same level Sec. 506 — Vent Termination (a) Each vent pipe or stack shall extend through its flashing at, shall terminate vertically not less than six (6) inches (152 4mr above the roof nor less than one (1) foot (.3m) from any vertiq surface (b) Each vent shall terminate not less than ten (10) feet (3„ from or at least three (3) feet (.9m) above any window, doe opening, air intake or vent shaft, nor less than three (3) feet ( 9m). -/9- s...a w y .a.a1 .. } ', 3 1. ICBO PLUMBING CODE i __ 1979 EDITION 1502 I =ter 15 4 Connections. When the circuit, loop or relief vent connections are J VENTING taken off the horizontal branch,the vent branch connection shall be taken off at a vertical angle or from the top of the horizontal branch. it piping aboveground in buildings shall i 5 Adjacent fixtures. Two fixtures set adjacent within the distance -1 per tube DWV weight or heavier, cast- allowed between a trap and its vent may be served with one continuous soil or waste-vent pipe, provided that each fixture connects separately into an ;i ipe, lead pipe or ABS or PVC DWV approved double fitting having inlet openings at the same level. [See Sec- Pi tion 1504(b)for inlet openings at different levels.] Liito and vent piping shall be cast-iron soil i (c)Fixture Vents. 1. Trap arm. Each fixture trap shall have a protecting 4: )WV or heavier, ABS or PVC DWV vent so located that the developed length of the trap arm is within the re- ength vitrified clay pipe with compres- quirements set forth in Table No. IS-A. hat it is installed with a minimum earth 2. Drain. The vent pipe from a fixture drain, except for water closets al specifically approved by the building and similar fixtures, shall not connect below the top weir of the trap. The 'i vent pipe may be connected at a lower elevation if the following conditions .I g on chemical waste systems shall con- are met: waste pipe,except as may be otherwise A. The vertical section of the drain pipe shall be at least one pipe size I, and shall be installed independently larger than the trap inlet size. i (a),Chemical I B. The horizontal pipe pe connected to the trap outlet must be at least two ;rm to the type of pipe used in the vent t pipe diameters long �t (a)and(b). I C. The developed length of the trap arm does not exceed the values in t Table No IS-A based on trap size. I. General.The protection of trap seals (d) Vent Stacks and Stack Vents. 1. Where required. Every buildingyi • k-pressure shall be accomplished by the which plumbin.is installed shall have_at least one main stackyhich shall, , stacks with adequate venting in ac- run un3im nishedin size and as directl_aas ossible from the_build_ ingdraia 1# `:is code. Venting systems shall be throtighlo the open air above the roof. A vent stack or a main vent shall It 3t ine shall trap seals be subjected to a be installed with a soil or waste stack whenever back vents,relief vents,Or A f more than 1 inch of water pressure other branc1i ven are requira-in a building of three or more branch l! trap seal is subject to loss by evapora- intervals. 1' event the escape of sewer gas T 2 Prohibited use. The plumbing vent system shall not be used for pur- 7, u(at on shall be deemed to preclude the to poses other than the venting of the plumbing system. IA or better design which comply with 3 Base connection. All main vents or vent stacks shall connect full size i as such by the building official. at tit-el r`_Ease tto t e rainage s s em;6lo thImatn`oil or waste pipe,at or Grade. All vent and branch vent pipes below the IowestT lure bran-c i..- - —"- • • as to drain to the soil or waste pipe by A 4 Horizontal offsets. Horizontal offsets of stacks in buildings having il i10 or more branch intervals shall be vented by one of the following et to a horizontal soil or waste pipe, the methods: , avert of the vent pipe is at or above the A. By considering the stack as two separate stacks above and below the waste pipe and downstream of the trap offset. . s. ,' B. By installing a relief vent as a vertical continuation of the lower sec- nection between a vent pipe and a vent uon of the stack. C. By connecting a side vent to the lower section between the offset and . t least 6 inches above the flood level rim ie vent. Horizontal vent pipes forming the next lower branch. . vents or loop vents shall be at least 6 The upper section of the offset shall be provided with a yoke vent. The the highest fixture served. diameter of the vents shall be not less than the diameter of the main vent or of the soil and waste stack,whichever is the smaller. t 93 `- ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES a�� ,� z� ITEM # MEETING OF NOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES ^h _ ABSTAIN • COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • PQACHE de/ O (� O 1rr,t, 1 4#1 NP ` ity o C4pache unction zo April 2, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGER FROM: LES TRASK, OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR THRU: RICH BROMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF FRONT END LOADER We would like to purchase a front end loader at this time. I feel that this .•. front end loader can cut our operating expenses considerably. We are periodically having to rent a front end loader which costs us one hundred ($100.00) dollars a day. We are going to try to do a lot of the on-site work on our new city complex such as backfilling; water, sewer, electrical and telephone trenches; as well as around our septic tank. We have for sometime needed a front end loader to clean away some of the rubbish along our streets, such as piles of dirt and weeds which are a fire hazard and also an eyesore to the public. There are a lot of our gravel streets which are in need of repair. We can use this front end loader to help haul gravel for repair and also asphalt for our paved streets. A front end loader will ease the work load of our large patrol and be able to do the smaller jobs that the large patrol is now doing. The loader will also free some of the workers to take care of other jobs that are being neglected. This front end loader will also handle the following attachments: 1. Rotary broom sweeper. 2. Mowing machine. 3. Post hole digger. 4. Rear blade. 5. etc. Since this tractor can handle all these attachments, it would eliminate the purchase of other separate pieces of equipment. 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST ONCE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 Page 2 - Memorandum My recommendation is the new Case 580C Loader Landscaper with the following: 1. Power shuttle troque converter. 2. 11L x 16 front tires. 3. 17.5L x 24 rear tires. 4. ROPS canopy. 5. No PTO. 6. 3 pt. hitch. 7. 82" long lip bucket. 8. Lockup package with panel cover. 9. Engine side panels. 10. Slow moving vehicle emblem. 11. Backup alarm. 12. Lights. 13. Gannon R-40-L box scrapper. Since I have operated most of the tractors in question, the Case has the best durability and lowest maintenance. Case Power J I Case TENNECO and Equipment A Tenneco Company 1411 N 27th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Phone 602/269-3221 April 2, 1980 Mr. Les Trask CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 150 N. Octillo Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 I am pleased to submit a quote on anew Case 580C Loader Landscaper with the following: Power shuttle troque converter 11L x 16 front tires 17.5L x 24 rear tires BOPS canopy AN. No PTO 3 pt. hitch 82" long lip bucket Lockup package with panel cover Engine side panels Slow moving vehicle emblem Backup alarm Lights Gannon R-40-L box scrapper This machine comes with a one (1) year parts and labor warranty on the machine and a two (2) year or 2,000 hour parts and labor warranty on the engine. FOB our Phoenix store. Your delivered price is EIGHTEEN THOUSAND SEVENTY THREE DOLLARS ($18,073.00) plus all applicable taxes. Immediate delivery available. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to bid you our equipment. We look forward to doing business with you in the near future. Sincerely, CASE POWER,ND EQUIPMENT T William Donatelli Sales Representative WD:mb Case Power J I Case TENNECO and Equipment A Tenneco Company 1411 N 27th Avenue 0.4 Phoenix Arizona 85009 Phone 602/269-3221 April 2, 1980 Mr. Les Trask CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 150 North Octillo Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 I am pleased to submit a quote on a new Case 480C Loader Landscaper with the following: Power shuttle torque converter ilL x 16 front tires 14.9 x 24 rear tires HOPS canopy No PTO 3 pt. hitch 82" short lip bucket SMV Lockup package with panel cover Engine side panels Backup alarm Lights Gannon R-40-L Box Scrapper This machine canes with a one (1) year parts and labor warranty on the machine and a two (2) year or 2,000 hour parts and labor warranty on the engine. FOB our Phoenix store. Your delivered price is FIFTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY NINE DOLLARS ($15,879.00) plus all applicable taxes. Immediate delivery available. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to quote you our equipment. We look forward to doing business with you in the near future. Sincerely, CASE POWER AND EQUIPMENT Wry\ &ar.'Y\C-k---&'c2--Qj2"- William Donatelli Sales Representative WD:mb 3501 1973 Case 580B Gannon 45L ve cyl. leaking, weld Rt.side ldr, repair fuel shut off, cutting edge, paint - - Resale -^ 11,000 Est. Recond. 1,000 ' • As is 9,000 5286 1973 Case 580B Gannon 45L I the out, weld on Rt. Loader aim, cracked around Rt. cross Bas bracket • . Resale...: -r11,000 Est. Recond. 3,000 Avg. As is. 8,000 . 34280 1973 Case • 580B Gannon ys ?ds brake work, needs cutting edge, pins and bushings poor, cyc. on 3 pt. leaking Reqal e 1.11,000 Est. Recond. 2,000 Avg. As is 9,000 • • 44237 1974 Case 580B Gannon '{5L "-e smoke, power steering leak Resale -412,000 Est. Recond. 3,000 As is 9,000 -lir . Year Brand Model Attachment - -. 39511 1974 Case 580B •• 4/SL gine knocks little, battery weak, converter leaking Resale 412,000 - - , , Est. Recond. 3,600 As is 8,400 • 000ua. 2 ui - '42349 1974 Case 580B -ySL - - _ ne needs work, shuttle weak, needs brakes ' ',..,C. `�' ✓ �5 � Resale • - _ e 3�;II0'0 i31. . t. . j, )`l •:_--_ .' !.,-C.' E. Est. Recond. . 89F• ‹ ~-% • _ _ _ .As is 7,500 SALES AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT L BINGHAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0 815 Gila Bend Hwy.,Casa Grande, Az 85222•Ph 836-8700 G(655 S Country Club Or, Mesa, Az 85202 Ph 969-5516 0 2450 W 32nd St., Yuma,Az 85366 Ph 726.4701 0 1320 Geronimo, Parker Az 85344 Ph 669-9271 0 710 N 19Sth Ave., Buckeye, Az 85326 Ph 386.3259 or 935.9262 Sold To: (P, > L c �i.�C Ver- . / ' Date: .3 ,c7L- f p Your P O.No.: Snipping and Delivery Instructions Terms and Conditions of Sale Subject to Terms and Conditions of Contract as sat forth on Reverse Side U 3 Yu /? IN 12AC Tcc ,t )r iL. , 711 3 c'-y/ / '7� C . "` L ✓r /�,jv ¢eve./cS rAicfk x.cs./CiZ C%;ti,'i2<. _ �Zi �� 7i/L ? ct_b ,L r+r 5 7 J /6 /)C/ 4-2?.. •I— Ti -2c' 5 7 `/ `� - ) . ,i,t7i/ / l v 1` ,tit T /_>e f.--,r ., P li:,` � � t� 3U 'FL �> f�':�iL � Sic. C!C `�� Ccc.it.� i /1 .] I II'-C iZ SC S t I�Q r1rZ r�Lfl�c� }/� s c• a PP" �CA iL S�ti e Pc',l. (� ' 7 -'� /' (i'V7 L I/8 BINGHAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY ' By. , cam _ �/ Accepted this day of , 19 Company Accepted Customer or Firm By* By Aopetrj R EQUIPMENT 7909 WEST GLENDALE AVENUE GLENDA LE,ARIZONA 85303 PHONE (602) 937 1636 GUADALUPE AND ARIZONA AVENUE•CHANDLER,ARIZONA-PHONE (602) 892 0066 3 i )- :Y (.• 1 \\I '-) > " t) I ,/ y •i h `, , /k_, t t _ 4 HS K � , 3 � ? 6 - t X . )- „ /al 4 s 90 . u--G 1'1 _ `f / Pyrck8 ,/..; 2A }, c t• orc--v ? . t- S c_ , c .1. � )--1,-. a ,� <_ S C....-, -c ._ ,f' S f jZ 3 P o ± ' P f.o- ' _ i3uo , u-p � � , V ,_ . r -, Jdi._ L g N -, 6V )- r-,-, G-,-, ,_ti .i L. A r, ") I �� , )- At 0 r .� Arizona Machinery Co., Inc. - P. O. Box 1591 Phoenix, Arizona 85001 SEEM Ph. Phoenix 269-9701 Ph. Chandler 963-4531 Ph. Buckeye 935-9182 March 12, 1980 Mr. Galen Monson Mr. Earl Black City of Apache Junction 150 W. Octillo Dr. Apache Junction, Arizona Dear Sirs: Here is our Bid, per your request, on the following equipment: Ask 1. One new John Deere 2240 tractor with all standard equipment and collar- shift transnission, Ind. 540 P.T.O., Cat. II (tele) 3 PT., one S.C.V. and breakaway coupler, steel wheels (8 position) , 16 X 9 X 28 rear tires, adj. front axles (swept back) , 7.50 X 16 front tires, two 55 amp. batteries and vertical muffler. Price $11,929.62 (Available in May) 2. One new John Deere 145 loader with Ind. valve, 72" bucket, bucket level indicator, and side frames. Price $2,005.01 (Available in March) 3. One new Woods RB600, 6' rear blade. Offsets, angles, and tilts. Price $442.00 (In Stock) 4. One new John Deere 350 hay mower with tire gards and 7' cutterbar. Price $1,130.67 .(In Stock) 5. r.ew Sweepster 3 PT broan model R-HF. Price $2,000.00 (Available in March) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ik442 ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: ;2k/ SECONDED BY : ,..� _ YFS ! NQ ABSTAIN . 'CaUfterLMAN-aU R G E S S COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRAN I LLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: �C BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PURCHASE OF A "CASE 580C LOADER LANDSCAPER" IN THE MOUNT OF $18, 073 , 00, PLUS TAX, FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 03-780, HIGHWAY USER FUND, BE AND IS HEREBY APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLISHED GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS , (ci c vz`'- u �,,�; f` �Y o • '4 gRIzoNP 'Oily o v�pac/ie ciinclion TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR ✓ LA•NNI PJ f 2QNI AJ ,-- BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: z -2 7- go NAME: o -tW P kita-ci4Ems TELEPHONE: 982-7975" (home) 994 - 1951 (office) ADDRESS: (plp&p S , pEIAWARE ZIP CODE: 8.5220 OCCUPATION: R -r; (if retired, please indicate former )occupation/ /r profession) EDUCATION: H � ( L�e�E� ,Jo Q��1��pJb �eCJAL� - CAI 3 _I NSU RA Nt',& .S' 'J- L Nrkio1Uy L.A j /ts./Ny /G A771W L4.SmTA ) PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: l 4m .aNAAE v5O f )R 7' E L. // L MaU S SE I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMITTEE BECAUSE r .c�N ik VJ W R rJ, Op GET' rn/w AecoM pLCs ti D Wi H IN A C MMI f e.. . IN itiplcHE Ja: £ h4vE &ERVe".p DA) C'.huQGM UIo4K h7" S7` r:veQES AMA PLSn MOOSE Lo 4.J , ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFOR TION/REFERS CES: / ,}M Ar_ I SE1JT NC4L LAJI .D f Tie Poyelz)JoRtM £/1EVe�.01 g ipc IN VOL-1/ 1a A1iI rE4Lows14- ' hi BuiLDING pumeES, / /-/ ci c R VA•LJD R� . LICENCE /N 4Z. id A.4-, f 1 NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. l X4,41,,&7i.6i,,, •gnature of Applicant 150 NOUN )X K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602) 982 6154 /Q ACHE P • �j 4,9,ZONP coil/ o pache c2unc/ion TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR R,e1/7"/M/6/26 / BOARD/COMMISSION/COMM I TTEE DATE: 3 /d ?O NAME: ZAG.D TELEPHONE: /O 2 �/ (home) ?%?,K—1!722'q8:-- (office) ADDRESS: go £. ZIP CODE: d SZ 2 Q OCCUPATIo*fa4/7 6"L./X% - /7L�,�� ,712iQ6, 7//il (if etired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: / 5. /�,f�' � 6/'f /#/ 0�/ ?v"9G Gd GC/f� /�� '��s", //Ai< ZC (//5es N i_�jG�,�'- PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ��r'Sj��/� ��i �i1 /c2.-✓ ,77,c'es' 'fig I FEEL THAT I AMQUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE �niy"; �/L'e7, 9j �L/�'j�'Ff/U� / �C11�'�� Q��i�7/l� c)�s �`f�• ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFOR`1ATION/REFERENCES: -/Jj2,97?i NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. ' If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. S gnature• of Applican 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACH JUNCTION,ARIZONA 8522aa TELEPHONE(602) 982-6154 t y�� ....„4„,,,‘4i�` z • ®5 44,zoNP O ity o pac/ze c 2unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR ,G%tivn;rrr BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: //)j6'U LL / 7 NAME: /101,-0 j/' /! 61/Z4,�-n--/ TELEPHONE: fi Y 0 ,2 .5 3 (home) ',� / (office) ADDRESS: /h' 3 51 /4/• ��-{c,,� Ll�c �� . ZIP CODE: P-J 2, D OCCUPATION: .,�Q, ,( (e (v o3 roc �7t f . 3 + (i retired, please indicate ormer occupation o/profession) EDUCATION: 14 PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: fQ ,«r-a 14) a 7/ t rn.GyL o I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE �� Gllr►��[l�c.�Gt L G� �✓ �1 L GG n c 7. Vr✓, 1��-&71. i r ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFOEL`tATION/REFERE`CES: � v ,Z, p�,y�Lc`, E�71�G�cJ (',' �,�� l(iiL�rn �z tLo NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. c. 44 t 11 f /tiu a-- Signat-ure of/ Applicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE SOX K.APACHE JUNCT ON.ARIZONA 55220 • TEL PHONE(602) 952-6154 PPACHE J,e/ O O u � * >y= z q,91ZONP it y pache unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR Manning and toning BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: rch 6. 1980 NAME: Henry 3teelsmith TELEPHONE: 9825314 (home) 982 5314 (office) ADDRESS: 2055 . Cortez Apache Jct. ZIP CODE: 85220 OCCUPATION: _.rchitect (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: -ach. of Architecture California State Polytechnic jniv. San Luis Obispo , Calif. PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: _ ember •rizona Society of the American Institute of Architects : '.ember of the pache Junction Jay ees I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE As an architect I have had for~ial education in glanning and zoning oroceedures and problems. as an architect in private 8ractice in the Phoenix -ietro area I have hade firstdhand exoerienoe ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: with nearly all the metro communities hie 'teen 1-n]. o -nsr n_l r 31 .cnt of oache Junction for two ye .rs . .f .__ nlI '.1do have a family business in o-ehe Tc 1 . NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City .•. Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city forlover 30 days at onetime/unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. iLI • L Signature of Appl meant) ISO NORTH oconuO • POST OFFICE SOX K.APACHE )UNCTFON.ARIZONA 55220 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-6154 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: �,Q(2 SECONDED BY: c;) sz� - 0'ONCILMAN URGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO 1� COUNCILMAN EIDSON !� COUNCILMAN HILL !--- COUNCILMAN SHANKS v� VICE-MAYOR GRAN I ILO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: a BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT /0 4 _._AND ARE HEREBY CONFIRMED TO BE AND ARE &FORTH APPOINTED "MEMBER" OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FOR TERMS TO END JUNE 30, 1982 , MOVED BY : SECONDED : ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 44, ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : - - YFS_ NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR CRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN - I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK / NAME: et if Z DATE: Z (� ADDRESS: �7� -/9.✓S !� � / AGENDA ITEM: , 7 �� a e S / Cci4...t,..,,-,:._ ,, t, II ' i , , 0, I, ��I I . / ,i oak i i If 7 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 4 — /:-i'7S c"Z ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: ..> iFS NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ( e 7-2. ca ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : - - YFS "ln A.BSTAI N COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN t UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: ;.)-j SECONDED BY : .-4ie7 ..1 YFS NO ABSTAIN . C COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • .004N • • /.11N • • ADJ04.R,N.7ENT • BE IT RESOLVED BY THE '1AYOR AND C7-Y :7)1_‘:CT:. 07 T :TY OF A?ACHE JUNCTION THAT THE FTI N G BE A7 _ _