Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980 05.07 City Council Regular Agenda PeACHE Jo. O C► U a.. ,,fig k r'', "'_�. IC'- 'lR/ZONP ity o4' & pache 2unction ANEW COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MAY 7, 1980 7:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, APRIL 16, 1980 AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE CALL TO THE PUBLIC (PETITIONS) CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) ORDINANCE NO. 45, GOLD DUST MOBILE HOME PARK ESTABLISHING ZONING (SECOND READING) UNFINISHED BUSINESS (TABLED ITEMS) NONE NEW BUSINESS (4) ORDINANCE NO. 42, ANNEXING SECTION 32 (SCHOOL SITE) (SECOND READING) (5) CAAG, TITLE XX, PLANNING CONTRACT 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MAY 7, 1980 PAGE 2 (6) ORDINANCE NO. 48, REZONING CASE PZ-7-80, AZURE SKIES SUBDIVISION (FIRST READING) (7) ORDINANCE NO. 41, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 2705 (FEE SCHEDULE) (FIRST READING) (8) EXECUTIVE SESSION, MAY 21, 1980, 6:00 P.M. (9) INFORMATION AND REPORTS REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (10) ADJOURNMENT ROLL CALL ROLL CALL PRESENT ABSENT I MAYOR SEPAN I VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO COUNCILMAN 3URGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO _ COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS TOTAL n 1� - 1` ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # 1 MEETING OF ./7/ MOTION BY: f\-s SECONDED BY : 1 YES " O _ ABST�I N COUNCILMAN BURGESS ' COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON ' COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: J ITEM NO . I BE IT RESOLVED EY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, _ .M. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING APRIL 16, 1980 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Assib. 1 Junction was held on April 16, 1980, at the Apache Junction City Hall , pursuant to the notice as required by law. CALL TO ORDER Vice-Mayor John Granillo called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. at the Apache Junction City Hall . INVOCATION Councilman Eidson gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice-Mayor Granillo led in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Vice-Mayor John Granillo, Thomas Damiano, �-► Norman Hill , Jimmy Eidson, Jerry Burgess, and Marie Shanks. Councilmembers absent: Mayor Virginia Seeman (due to illness) Staff present: G. Ray Lee, City Manager Rich Oesterle, City Clerk Susan Goodwin, Assistant City Attorney Richard Broman, Director of Public Works Joe Gero, Director of Planning William McDaniel , Director of Public Safety Marlis Davis, Director of Admin. Serv. Others present: Robert Condra, P. 0. Box 515, Apache Junction Ted Ledsetter, Brad Durham, Elmer Wood, and Danny Bush, Cestin Valley Trailer Park, Apache Junction. Robert Dugger, 710 S. Lawson, Apache Junction Al Limber, 126 S. Tomahawk, Apache Junction Juan Herrera, Queen Creek ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED WITH THE DELETION OF ITEM NO. 8. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEE"NG 4/16/80 Page 2 Councilman Burgess seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, APRIL 16, 1980 ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 2, 1980, BE AND ARE HERESY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: IN FAVOR: Councilman Damiano Councilman Eidson Councilman Hill Councilman Shanks Vice-Mayor Granillo ABSTAIN: Councilman Burgess (not present at the meeting) oink AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS ) None CALL TO THE PUBLIC ) Robert Condra, P. 0. Box 515, Apache Junction had three questions as follows. 1. Are the Police Officers of the Apache Junction bonded? 2 . Has the Council in the last two weeks had time to consider a reply to his question on why the City does not take Cash for Bail? 3. If not, how does one go about getting the law changed before cash can be applied for bail? City Manager Lee answered in detail that the Department of Public Safety's policy is not to handle cash and the requirements to handle bail with a money order are under our current contract with the Pinal County Sheriff's Office. Also in answering Mr. Condra's questions, Mr. Lee explained that the City Officers currently are not bonded and not obligated to handle full service until May one. Robert Condra asked come May one will the City Police Department still not be under the bonding system. City Manager Lee explained that would be a dicision of the City and gave an outline of what the decisions would be based on. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEEA4NG 4/16/80 Page 3 Assistant City Attorney Goodwin responded that the City Attorney's Office did answer the question that was brought before the City Council at the last meeting on why the City did not accept Cash for Bail . Miss Goodwin stated she would forward Mr. Condra a copy of the letter. Mr. Brad Durham, spokes- man for Ted Ledsetter, Elmer Wood and Danny Bush who reside in the Cestin Valley Trailer Park, expressed his concern of the condemnation of all the trailers in the Park. He further explained the problems they would have in evacuating as they are low income families living in that park. Mr. Durham presented the following petiton signed by the residents of the Cestin Valley Trailer Park: WE, THE RESIDENTS of Cestin Valley Trailer Park having been served notice by the City of Apache Junction to evacuate our homes with no alternative other than prison and the discrimination against low income families and children who are residents of this City do group and bind ourselves together for the cause of saving ourselves and our children from the financial and emotional burden placed upon us. That the burden should be born by the City of Apache Junction. We hereby set our seals with our signatures. Signed the residents of Cestin Valley Trailer Park. Mr. Durham further expressed concern on the cost of finding other places to live, requesting the City for assistance and direction. Vice-Mayor Granillo called on Building Official Leo Frazier to give an explanation of what has transpired. Building Official Leo Frazier explained in detail building code violations at the Cestin Valley Trailer Park, noting there have been approximately 17 fires at the park since 1973 and 2 electrical fires within the past year. Mr. Frazier further explained that pursuant to the Uniform Building Code, he served the manager, Mr. Lipovic , with notice after inspection of the park and finding numerous violations. Mr. Frazier stated he posted notifications on the individual units and attached a letter of explanation to the residents regarding the evacuation of the units. Mr. Frazier stated the electrical system was a life threatening situation and the premises should be vacated. Mr. Frazier further reported that there had been an electrical contractor into the Building Department to pick up an application and specifications, and informed him that he will have the permit, application and drawings for the revision of the electrial system by Monday. The City Council asked questions pretaining to who were the owners of the trailers and the dangers that are of an immediate concern. Mr. Frazier explained that there are provisions in the code that as long as there is action on correcting the situtation the evacuation could be put in abeyance. The action to correct the situation must be continuous, it can not be put off for three months. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEF34NG 4/16/80 Page 4 Vice-Mayor Granillo summed up the matter saying Mr. Durham stated his concern and Mr. Lipovic is taking action to correct the problem. Vice-Mayor Granillo suggested to give Mr. Lipovic a chance to correct the problem in the given time and if he does not, the City Council may have an emergency meeting. Robert Dugger, 710 S. Lawson, instead of upsetting sixty-five families by saying you have to move out, why couldn't Mr. Lipovic be given 30 days to straighten the matter out. Al Limber, 126 S. Tomahawk at the Tomahawk Trailer Park, Apache Junction, stated that the question on who is the electrical inspector has not yet been answered and would like to know the answer to that question. Building Inspector Leo Frazier stated he believed the question asked was if there was a specialty electrical inspector and the answer was no. There are two inspectors working for the City including himself and both of them have at various times been licensed as contractors in just about every phase of building construction. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT ) City Manager Lee called on the Director of Planning, Joe Gero, to report on the up coming Town Hall Meeting. Planning Director Gero reported on the Town Hall meeting scheduled for April 26th, for the purpose Of putting together a City Plan for the Community, educating staff, Commission members and citizens prior the proposal of the recommended City Plan. Mr. Gero went over the proposed agenda for the Town Hall Meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS ORDINANCE NO. 44, REZONING CASE PZ-5-80, BUCK (SECOND READING) ) Vice-Mayor Granillo opened the public hearing for Rezoning Case PZ-5-80, Ordinance No. 44, the applicant Mr. Virgil Buck. Vice-Mayor Granillo called on the Planning Director to brief the City Council on the case. Planning Director Gero referred to the sketch and explained that the property is located at 252 N. Ironwood and the surrounding property is zoned General Rural . The application has been heard before the Planning and Zoning Commission and a copy of their recommendation is in the Council 's packet. The Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of the Rezoning Case as request- ed by Mr. Buck to CR-4, multiple residence. Mr. Gero futher explained the reasons for the recommendations. Mr. Virgil Buck, the applicant, 252 N. Ironwood, stated that Mr. Gero explained the case very well and did not wish to add any more. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 4/16/80 �. Page 5 Vice-Mayor Granillo asked Mr. Gero if this Rezoning would revert back if the applicant does not start the improvements within a given time. Assistant City Attorney Susan Goodwin explained that there may be a provision in the zoning code that might cover it and require a reversion, but was not sure without further research. Vice-Mayor Granillo asked if any one in the audience wished to speak in favor of the petition. John Haber, 1151 S. Virginia, stated that his property is all occupied now, and explained what structures are in the area now. Planning Director Joe Gero explained the property in question has 32700 square feet of gross area. The Ordinance allows one dwelling unit per 3500 square feet. The total area is sufficient to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, in addition the ordinance does specify set backs between main buildings from the property lines. Vice-Mayor Granillo asked if any one in the audience wished to speak in opposition of the petition. No response from the audience. Planning Director Joe Gero stated as Planning Director he has gone over this particular area, has found that this area will have to have some kind of a transistion and he concurred with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and pointed out that no one spoke adversely at the Planning Commission hearing, although some people did ask questions. Mr. Gero recommended approval for the same reason as given by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Vice-Mayor Granillo declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 44, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Shanks seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Vice-Mayor Granillo called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 44. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 4/16/80 AM. Page 5 City Clerk Rich Oesterle read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 44, .�. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-80 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO MULTIPLE RESIDENCE (CR-4) ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO. 44, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-80 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO MULTIPLE RESIDENCE (CR-4) ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Aoki LIQUOR LICENSE TRANSFER FOOD COUNTRY STORE, C.K. , HERRERA Vice-Mayor Granillo opened the Public Hearing for Transfer of License, Person to Person, the applicant Juan Herrera and Ofelia Jimenez Herrera and stated that if the applicant is present he may speak on his behalf at this time. Juan Herrera, Queen Creek, stated he purchased the store from Mr. Sanchez and would like the liquor license transfer. Vice-Mayor Granillo asked for questions of the City Council , and from the audience. Being no one wished to speak on the matter, Vice-Mayor Granillo closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF LICENSE, PERSON TO PERSON SERIES 10, OFF-SALE RETAILER'S LICENSE TO SELL ALL SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR BY APPLICANT, JUAN J. HERRERA AND OFELIA JIMENEZ HERRERA, BE AND IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSE AND CONTROL. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEE, 11G 4/16/80 .� Page 6 NEW BUSINESS ORDINANCE NO. 45, GOLD DUST MOBILE HOME PARK ESTABLISHING ZONING (FIRST READING) ) ) Vice-Mayor Granillo called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 45 for the first reading. City Clerk Rich Oesterle read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 45 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN ZONING CASE PZ-4-80 AS TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) , THE PROPERTY HAVING BEEN ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. ORDINANCE NO. 42, ANNEXING SECTION 32 (SCHOOL SITE) (FIRST READING) ) ) Vice-Mayor Granillo called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 42 for the first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 42 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, EXTENDING AND INCREASING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION INTO PINAL COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 7, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, BY ANNEXING THERETO CERTAIN TERRITORY PREVIOUSLY UNINCORPORATED AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. RESOLUTION NO. 80-13 COMMUNITY ATTITUDE SURVEY ) Vice-Mayor Granillo called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Resolution No. 80-13. City Clerk Rich Oesterle read as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 80-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ENCOURAGING CITIZENS OF APACHE JUNCTION TO PARTICIPATE IN A COMMUNITY ATTITUDE SURVEY AND REQUIRING CONFIDENTIALITY IN THE SURVEY PROCESS. Vice-Mayor Granillo called on Kathy Anderson to answer questions of the City Council and the audience. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR ME .JiG 4/16/80 i•. Page 7 Kathy Anderson stated her interest on the Community Attitude Survey and that of the Planning Department coincide with the General Plan Development of the City. She further explained how the results would be handled confidentially through the computer. Miss Anderson answered questions from the City, as well from the audience. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ENCOURAGING CITIZENS OF APACHE JUNCTION TO PARTICIPATE IN A COMMUNITY ATTITUDE SURVEY AND REQUIRING CONFIDENTIALITY IN THE SURVEY PROCESS, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. EXECUTIVE SESSION, MAY 7, 1980, 6:00 P.M. ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE ~ JUNCTION, THAN AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVICE, BE HELD ON THE 7TH DAY OF MAY, 1980, AT 6:00 P.M. Councilman Shanks seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS Councilman Damiano read the following letters into the record. Congress of the United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Ms. Ballard, Thank you very much for your recent letter which forwarded a resolution from the City Council regarding the need for a bridge at the crossing of the Salt-Gila Aqueduct and Baseline Road. I appreciate your bringing this matter to my attention. The City's interest in this bridge is certainly understandable and I will do all I can to be of assistance. Thank you again for writing, and best wishes. Yours sincerely, John J. Rhodes 1st District, Arizona Minority Leader CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEEJ.I;(IG 4/16/80 �.. Page 8 Arizona Department of Transportation Ink Dear Ms. Ballard Mr. Ordway has asked that I respond to your letter of March 19, 1980 concerning a bridge across the CAP Aqueduct and Baseline Road. Baseline Road is not the responsibility of the Arizona Department of Transportation and, therefore, we would have no jurisdiction over a bridge on the route. I suggest you forward a copy of the resolution to the Pinal County Highway Department. Yours very truly, Oscar T. Lyon, Jr. , P.E. Assistant Director and State Engineer Congress of the United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515 Dear Isabel C. Ballard, Thank you for bringing to my attention the City Council 's resolution of support for the construct- ion of a bridge at the crossing of the Salt-Gila Aqueduct and Baseline Road. With a view to being of assistance in this matter, I have taken it up with the officials of the appropriate federal agency, requesting them to look into it and to advise me fully about it. As soon as I hear from them, I will get in touch with you again. It is a privilege to be of service. Sincerely, Eldon Rudd Member of Congress REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE CITY STAFF TO DRAFT A LETTER, PLEDGING OUR SUPPORT AND OUR ASSISTANCE (MANPOWER ASSISTANCE) NECESSARY TO CLEAN UP THE MASSAGE PARLORS ALONG APACHE TRAIL. THE LETTER TO BE SENT TO JERRY HILL OF THE CITY OF MESSA, AND COUNTY ATTORNEY CHUCK HAGGARD WITH MARICOPA COUNTY. Councilman Shanks seconded the motion. .. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Councilman Eidson stated that he happened to be in Chief McDaniel 's Office and he over heard the abusive language a man used toward the employees. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEEJ.iVG 4/16/80 .•. Page 9 Councilman Eidson requested that he wanted it know that the City Council will not stand for citizens coming into City Hall , using vulgar language on city employees and that the employees do not have to put up with it. ADJOURNMENT ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:42 P.M. Councilman Shanks seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1980, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. .N. Mayor Virginia Seeman ATTEST: Rich Oesterle City Clerk ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF s17/ 0 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: l�l YPs NO ABSTT 1 N COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS V COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN BURGESS • COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN - r UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 16, 1980, BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. r-- a CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK (� NAME: DATE:f% `/ 7 e ADDRESS: 6re/I/ AGENDA ITEM: 3 D--? yt��.,��e� �� T S -� / 1 / - 441 1/ oomik Aft, •►. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: � l/ % Ujf7,d DATE: ADDRESS: /�// S 2 if )9 pgr) nP l` AGENDA ITEM: CIO/v /19 f0 /2/1- - e Amok Aft. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME 04N 4'N©E£4J 5 DATE: G ADDRESS: 19 73" 'tL fa S9E66. 4</ AGENDA ITEM: ��/ o CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: r.j Q E DATE: S- 7"tl 0 ADDRESS: I2 S. Dc.,2yqIN) YIN ES-A AGENDA ITEM: l\)677A1 3c j S la/ES r .-Tz-m 'DI N✓��1C� p a CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION -/� REQUEST TO SPEAK (� NAME: O III � SS�/C DATE: .?ED ADDRESS: 1 -0 l S. ( C TVS A J AGENDA ITEM: ` Oak CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 147 REQUEST TO SPEAK ,/ / x '-, NAME: \C � `'� . DATE: 7 ADDRESS: / 7 1, 00 f---/ C"Z- ) A AGENDA ITEM: (1,, / d/ -IA -1tc.avv- PUBLIC HEARING I . THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR .•ft, '1?5: THE APPLICANT IS �V�4 ✓G4 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION . 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN Amok OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) G. CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR HIS RECOMMENDATIONS . 7. ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY — OR NEED — CHAIRMAN 'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B. IN FAVOR C. OPPOSED o . PQpCHE,/Gb O O� F... Oil ler-.0 4 ...-, ,w,....: , Aikvzo - V ity o (Apache unction ITEM No. 3 A",-t:rJ'Y ON Sl.ld�..e. .,, ��244 C April 29, 1980 --- I.) ,. _,:-T:,5 FOR f.G":� �" --- . I,:20/ BUS'i•ASS 4 _... 1Nr O/REPORTS CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERSOF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGER / FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING JU/4-5 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE #45 (PZ-4-80) At your last Council Meeting the first reading of Proposed Ordinance #45 was on your agenda. On your May 7, 1980 meeting there is a scheduled public hearing on the establishment of the initial zoning for Gold Dust Mobile Home Park. The applicant has requested a zoning classification of Trailer Homesite (TH) . The Planning and Zoning Commission held their advertised public hearing in consideration of this request on April 14, 1980. During the hearing the Commission learned the following: 1. Gold Dust Mobile Home Park is an existing Mobile Home Park. However, there are portions of the park yet to be developed. 2. Those portions that are yet to be developed would be subject to the Zoning and Building Code requirements at the time of requesting development permits. 3. A portion of the park which was developed under Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance standards would not be in compliance with the City of Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance requirements. These exceptions to the City's Zoning Ordinance would be minimal in terms of impact. Moreover, the development of the park generally exceeds the requirements of the City of Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance. 4. The park owner Mr. Halbert, has agreed to comply with a requirement that those sights which have mobile homes placed upon them but which do not have complete permits, that the park owner would within 90 days secure the appropriate permits from the City of Apache Junction Building Official. Attached you will find a copy of page 3 from the "Minutes" of the April 14, 1980 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting which sets forth the motion of the Commission with regard to the establishment of zoning for the Gold Dust Mobile 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 Page 2 - Memoraim - Honorable Mayor and Memberf the City Council Home Park. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. The Commission did set forth two conditions which were agreeable to the applicant. I call your attention to these as set forth in the middle of the said page. eiN The Director of Planning concurs with the Commission's decision and recommends the establishment of zoning classification as TH for the Gold Dust Mobile Home Park. ATTACH: AIN -3- 8. Kell/Oltman M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission /N of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona that in Zoning Case PZ-4-80 application of Marvin Halbert, by Commission Initia- tive, to establish the initial zoning classification as Trailer Homesite (TH) of the Gold Dust Mobile Home Park, a parcel of land described as: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section Twenty- four (24) TIN, C&SRB&M, thence South 355.09 feet to the true point of beginning, thence West 660.5 feet thence South 1785.04 feet, thence East 361.3 feet, thence North 300 feet, thence East 300 feet, thence North 1,485. 18 feet to the true point of beginning containing twenty-five (25) acres more or less. and also known as 202 N. Meridain Road that the initial zoning be approved as Trailer Homesite (TH) subject to: 1 . That the park owner apply for and gain approval from the Buildip3 Official within ninety (90) days from the date of approval by the City Council of the zoning classification for those sites not having a .�. valid building permit but which are being occupied for residential purposes. (at least sites 7, 26, 28, 52 and possibly 9 and 31) . 2. That setbacks established in areas already developed shall be granted "grandfather" variances. And at the time of hook-up of units in already developed areas, the mobile homes shall have to only meet these requirements consistent to the rest of the developed area, provided no limit shall be required to exceed the City Zoning Ordinance requirements. The reasons for the recommendation are: 1. The Mobile Home Park is an established park 2. The granting of approval would subject the owner to obtaining in a reasonable time these outstanding building permits which are to protect the public health, safety and general welfare 3. The Mobile Home Park is generally developed in ^ compliance with Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Further, the Commission recommends to the City Council that in establishing the initial zoning ciassification that this be done declaring an emergency in that the procedures have been rather lengthy and by such procedure the owner would then be permitted to proceed in an orderly fashion to meet the upcoming season requirements. Adak Sot Dug lat. Box S Apache JunCtton,Arizona 8522() GOLD D US O S 1 E HOME RESORT OFFICERS t)IRECTORS 0If,ce S8S-2155 MARVIN J HALBERT,President JERKY McCLENTHAN Vice President MRS CHERELYN CHANEY,Sec Treas. ()L._>,Xg_t_e) 67/1,4A-4 t-0--6' `c- .)C;t)-1-..2_- e ec‘j • &'rt-li---c---"C-e-y -, - e--7(---*t-d A..31.z..?4 V")--)ee.,t,-0_.4_,) ...7 • /9,4 Zemac, -_,2-"/ ,,, E ,L.� -Z-- t-e et__ ,..--7.4-) -74-C (-774-4_-F-.t.) I el-1,.e_ ...,e_,,...6 -"ife.---e--e..--e-a,t) )17,:,......›,,,t—e-.0.e.) il.:-c-e_i..--Z-- ,)-2,t___-,e_e_:Le k.,?-.4--,7,„..___, c...._?,_„4„_.„4 ,.......... eLet____,„<__,,,,e_4e_...) g-e.e..4_-e_,e-"c.e--__Zeme ./L' ",`- -„, c.� ' j-tt_.<'-..._.-e--C.L---est-&.i-1 /'E'`re_--,1-G_st--c- 4�1.� j s---x- -----�� • (72,2_,.„..4.•"4„) tk ,,,44_,,, _,,r , (2___ 6- '-i-)et_ ,,,,__e_-,e__a6.—ft) a__..„_. /. _____,..„.„.,..) „e..„..., ,,,t,_..-ire_e_f_...),...,..„-Z 2,-/-,-c_--ipt0---4,i ,„,e,...!4--<_- ---/-) /---" -e----t---• am.,--� ,a•-.-a/ ..<<c,,_} . 6 rt-..A -e—) gs.—„,...,_:-.e_A 0..._e__,„7. _ ,e... e__,_: 3,.,.,",,,e_p_...._e_____"__,,_,c,,,____,e, got___7j .e..- ,,i_17-,- 4 a _____,,,„.,,,,,.,:, („_,,,,,, (-_-:-/-c-e---f--"--z---ve 41 ...,,,,-e6---e-----0-f----g I (;),,,.......e_, ,f-,--,_...) ...L.,....„ z.' ) .,: _...,--.:-..y.7_,,,,),....,e->c:-__.„,,,____,..-- --€__-,---- --0----- ----se-- ---e-Av7tv-e-_„...._....ei„) ,z_e__e_...... • 7r-e----e--Ix ei,,,e.--<A_it-•_...: (2.-,cl__-c-z---1C.-e.---, • 9),-)10_,A„,_-,C.---s<---1} -_ 3 ON ORDINANCE NO. 45 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN ZONING CASE PZ-4-80 AS TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) , THE PROPERTY HAVING BEEN ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF APACHE .UNCTION, ARIZONA, 061 EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 16, 1980: REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; ( PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DEC)BING AN EMERGENCY) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance by establishing the initial zoning district classification in zoning case PZ-4-80 for the parcel of land described as: 1. Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section Twenty-four (20-T.I.N. r--- R. 7E. , G.&.S.R.B.&.M. thence South 355.09' to the true point of begin , thence West 660.5 feet, thence South 1785.04 feet, thence E. 361.3 feet, thence North 300 feet, thence East 300 feet, thence North 1,485.18 feet, to the true point of beginning containing 25 acres more or less, be and hereby is established as Trailer Homesite (TH). 2. Further, the setbacks existing as of the effective date of this Ordinance in developed sites of the above described parcel, shall be deemed non-conforming uses and shall be permitted to continue as provided for in the Zoning Ordinance, and at the time of hook-up of units in already developed areas, the mobile homes shall have to meet only those requirements consistent with the rest of the developed area, provided, however, no limitation shall be required to exceed the City Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. Further, those areas not developed as of the effective date of this ordinance shall be required to meet the setback and other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Further, within 90 days from the effective date of this ordinance, the park owner shall obtain building permits or those sites now accepted for residential purposes but not having valid permits. (At least sites 7, 26, 28, and 52 and possibly 9 and 31) . SECTION II PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted hereinbe reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ON If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court An Alak Ordinance No. 45 Page 2 of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of rm. the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV DECLARING AN EMERGENCY Whereas, it is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 1980. Mayon ATTEST: /mak City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jl� SQ%\ as7=7 . City Attorney PRO1'oseD Ty 7 RA/ccTne f{omc-'s,T = Nam' G oL a ace s r, 7/VC. /)'10 8/L tC /*n+E' PA1e K in LI A/i vER 5 ,T Y o 3sso9 � ... (0(oo S' _ ?go po StD • To 8 C. /1 20")L-q) : -- 1 try ( . CLuo25 TO oG srkee r) 7.1 Cary of jloo' 60iSt S-rREET 3v APA CUE 'Yost T16P a 300' o r 300 o � C -v 36t.3 i ss' NoT TO SCALE hho/�.e/ all j 4.,.7P- d°AsE Jr /,2- _ &o ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # 3 9 °tN MEETING OF / I l(C/d MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: (115 YES Uf ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN HILL v COUNCILMAN DAMIANO i COUNCILMAN SHANKS v COUNCILMAN BURGESS • COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN t UNANIMOUS 1 IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, -3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE STEP 1 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO, 45 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED, (NOTE : This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full. ) STEP 2 NOTE: CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO. 45 BY TITLE ONLY, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, STEP 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO, 45, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN ZONING CASE PZ-4-80 AS TRAILER HOMESITE (TH), THE PROPERTY HAVING BEEN ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF APACHE !UNCTION, ARIZONA, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 16, 1980; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. (MOTION WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) (THE ORDINANCE WILL BE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON PASSAGE) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 4,1077r) 't Lu,k-V ddt e lyi c r v y ITEM # k�� MEETING OF _0(�� MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : IU YFS NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN CHAN KS `f COUNCILMAN RURGFSS ' COUNCILMAN FInSON • COUNCILMAN N I I L COUNCILMAN DAM IANO ✓� VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO • , MAYOR SEEMAN _ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: [)(‘ ITEM NO, 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE STEP 1 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO, 45, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED, (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full. ) STEP 2 NOTE: CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO, 45, BY TITLE ONLY, WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, STEP 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO, 45, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN ZONING CASE PZ-4-80 AS TRAILER HOMESITE (TH), THE PROPERTY HAVING BEEN ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 16, 1980; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. ^OTION WIT! EMERGENCY CLAUSE) (THIS IS THE SECOND PcADING THE ORDINANCE WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE IN 30 DAYS) ROLL._.CALL YQIE S_ EI NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES Nf RTAJN COUNCILM AN_J ,.OUNC I VAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN EIpSON COUNCILMAN FILL VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN ' - UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ti ITEM NO. -3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO. 45, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL ZONING DISTRICK CLASSIFICATION IN ZONING CASE PZ-4-80 AS TRAILER HOMESITE (TH), THE PROPERTY HAVING BEEN ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 16, 1980; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND IS HEREBY DENIED. FOR DENIAL PQACHE✓ <:4401% 4, U y t,-_ Z• Ai 4#1ZONt `OoitY o c pache unction March 26, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manage .. FROM: Joseph W. Gero, Planning Director for Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Ordinance 1142 - proposed annexation of Section 32 The Apache Junction School Board has submitted a petition requesting annexation to the City of Apache Junction, Their request includes the land they own and the parcel they lease from the State Land Department. Tie State Land Department has submitted a letter to the School Board in which they state in part: "we neither protest nor take a position of advocacy for annexation." The AORCC grant for funding certain recreational facilities at the school's complex located at Ironwood and Southern has been approved. This joint city-schools project will be constructed under city super- vision. Further, it will be the responsibilty of the City to provide scheduling for the use of the facilities. Other than the school use, the remainder of Section 32 is in State trust and/or resctved for the Superstition Freeway. Two of the pro- posed ramp locations would be in Section 32 and the determination of zoning for such property will be at the discretion of either Pinal County or the City, if annexed. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At its regular meeting of March 24, 1980, the P & Z Commission approved unanimously by roll-call vote to recommend to the City Council the 40,4„ annexation of Section 32, R8E, TIN, G & SRB&M ITEM No. 42 I---=A APPROVED ON il(g/5.70 s//./8d ----- Pli"" ' y,''':IG C' •. , ESS FOR AGENDA OF . /.f4 5/7/80 ✓_ N1V'/ T_,S NESS - ______ INFO/REPORTS CITY MANAGER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 Mayor and Council Page 2 Ordinance #42 The primary objectives are: 1. To convey the Apache Junction High School and Board of Education office into the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. 2. To enable the students and faculty to enjoy the many advantages of being able to participate in various municipal activities. During the discussion the following findings were made: 1. The subject area is contiguous to the municipal boundary of the City of Apache Junction for one mile. 2. The Apache Junction school district has, by petition, requested annexation to the City of Apache Junction of their property, owned and leased, located in the subject Section 32. 3. The rest of Section 32 is Arizona Trust Properties or right-of-way for the proposed Superstition Freeway. By letter the State Land Department has indicated that: "we neither protest nor take a position of advocacy for annexation". 4. The City of Apache Junction has jointly applied with the Apache Junction School District for an AORCC grant which has been approved to provide certain recreation facilities to the mutual benefit of the school program and residents of the community. Although there is no legal requirement, such facilities should be within the corporate limits and are the obligation of the city for scheduling. 5. The area is generally undeveloped and the demand for most municipal services, until development occurs, will not be great. 6. Section 32 is within the Township and is provided Fire Protection service by the Township Fire Department. RL/JWG:an Amk An, ORDINANCE NO. 42 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, EXTENDING AND INCREASING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION INTO PINAL COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 7, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, BY ANNEXING THERETO CERTAIN TERRITORY PREVIOUSLY UNINCORPORATED AND CONTIGUOUS TO THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVER- ABILITY. WHEREAS, a written petition has been presented to the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, signed by the owners of more than one-half in value of the real and personal property in Section 32, R8E, TIN, G&SRB&M as would be subject to taxation by the City of Apache Junction in the event of annexation within the territory and land hereinafter described as shown by the last assessment of said property, which said territory is contiguous to the City of Apache Junction, so as to embrace the same; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, are desirous of complying with said petition and extending and increasing the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction to include said territory; and WHEREAS, it will be to the benefit of the City of Apache Junction to establish the zoning in the vicinity of the proposed Superstition Freeway in Section 32, immediately south of the City; and WHEREAS, the rest of Section 32 is State Trust properties having no real or personal property valuation subject to "taxation; and WHEREAS, it will be to the benefit of the City of Apache Junction to establish the zoning in the vicinity of the proposed Superstition 01461 Freeway in Section 32, immediately South of the City; and WHEREAS, the State Land Department has stated by letter: "we neither protest nor take a position of advocacy for annexation"; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I IN GENERAL .mik That the following described territory be, and the same hereby is, annexed to the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, and that the present corporate limits be, and the same hereby are, extended and increased to include the following described territory contiguous to the present City limits, to wit: -2- A parcel of land being all of Section 32, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, G&SRB&M, Pinal County, Arizona. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS .ano, All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by refer- ence, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the reamining portions thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 1980. Mayor ATTEST: AM\ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney LOST DUTCHIf►An/ Bc.V1) 3 )To Z /8 "7 /( /s 0 N >0 b b n C ,ry OF APgCHE JuNCT ion/ C 0 / 9 2 0 2/ zz G NORTH 3 ? n Z o b Z ) a g 30 29 .28 .27 x a 1 SoITNt-RN AVEAIut t L°/T'/ L//fi iT5 Z a b d li) S CtnOw/ / Ri t. /a, E 3 2 AREA ro ee ,q„InlsxaD m 8� 7 1 //// TOc✓NSH/P ivOR7NCO TOuJMsH,P / Soar,/ Q i k'lici) ,� Arizona g �O' ° AY Bruce Babbitt .tate Eaith epartnwut 4 Governor Sae T. Fa111n1 1624 WEST ADAMS Commissioner PHOENIX ARIZONA 85007 "` February 21, 1980 Mr. William Wright Superintendent Apache Junction Schools P.O. Box 879 Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Mr. Wright, It is customary for the department to encourge the in— corporators to secure the signatures of the necessary 51% of the property owners from amoung other property owners. We neither protest nor take a position of advocacy for annexation. Sincerely, ro„doi.;., ke_ ,..., ,,, _, „, _ . _3,..,, ii,:z. . . „.„ Dennis McCarthy .^; CF-,+;"-:i . -, - ;, Urban and Commercial ands Division AP;;L, �,, ;;�' S,di joi i% is DMcC/rfk L• q, PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA The undersigned, being the owners of not less than one-half of the real and personal property, as shown by the last assessment of the property as would be subject to taxation by the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, in the event of annexation of a certain parcel of land hereinafter described specifically in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, petitior, the governing body of the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, to enact an ordinate annexing the territory described in Exhibit "A" to the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. Petitioners represent that said territory described in Exhibit "A" is contiguous to the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and is not currently embraced within the city or town limits of any municipality. Further, petitioners state that a legal description herein referred to as Exhibit "A" delineates all the exterior boundaries of the entire area proposed to be annexed to the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, and that Petitioners have attached as Exhibit "B" hereto and made a part hereof an accurate map of the territory desired to be annexed to the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; - 1 - sal i Petitioners further represent that there have been no additions or alterations increasing the territory sought to be annexed by this Petition after it has been signed by any property owner affixing his name hereto. Dated this 11th day of December 1979. 2. Board Presitent Board Mem er :- d ` Bo rd Clerk Boar er 0--x-A-ekt Board Member Superintendent Subcribed and swor to before me this day of 19 79 My Commission E .cs ,L! 7, 1 32 Aee Notary - 2 - As Ilk Aft. EXHIBIT A The legal description of the land in question is as follows : A Forty-Acre (40) Plot which is the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE4NW4) of Section 32, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, G&SRB&M. The second Forty-Acre (40) Plot is the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW4NW4) of Section 32, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, G&SRB&M. The land described above is bounded by the following streets, on the North by Southern Avenue, on the East by San Marcos Drive, on the South by the proposed Superstition Freeway, and on the West by Ironwood Drive. A map of the area is available in Exhibit B. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # � ?fi \ MEETING OF 517(K6 MOTION BY: tiA5 SECONDED BY : I) ' YFS I NO j ABSTAIN I COUNCILMAN BURGESS I / COUNCILMAN DAMIANO `� COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL ✓ COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO • , / MAYOR SEEMAN ✓ UNANIMOUS I IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: J f . ITEM NO, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE STEP 1 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THE THE READING OF ORNINANCE NO, 42, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance if full. ) STEP 2 NOTE: CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO, 42 BY TITLE ONLY. STEP 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO, 42, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, EXTENDING AND INCREASING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION INTO PINAL COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 7, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, BY ANNEXING THERETO CERTAIN TERRITORY PREVIOUSLY UNINCORPORATED AND CONTINGUOUS TO EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED, FOR APPROVAL ROLL CALL VOTE SiEET NOTES ITEM # 2- 5,0 MEETING OF s 7 ff� MOTION BY: �� SECONDED BY: 9 YES NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS_ COUNCILMAN HILL ✓ COUNCILMAN BURGESS • COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ,ram. ITEM NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO. 42, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, EXTENDING AND INCREASING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION INTO PINAL COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 7, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, BY ANNEXING THERTO CERTAIN TERRITORY PREVIOUSLY UNINCORPORATED AND CONTINGUOUS TO �► EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY DENIED. FOR DENIAL PQACNF�Lti O 0z a &4pache Ounction Amok -1RI ZO NP APRIL 7, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGE SUBJECT: CENTRAL ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TITLE XX PLANNING CONTRACT It is my recommendation that the City of Apache Junction continue its participation in the CAAG Title XX Planning Contract for the fiscal year 1981 , and that the City's share of the cash match, in the amount of $871 .00, be approved for payment. pac REM No. - APPROVED ON14/..� FU3'IC ;':G .!;"dG FOR AGENDA OF 4/21 /��1 \tom.Y INFO/ REPORTS CITY MANAGE 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 CENTRAL ARIZON4, ASSOCIATION ?AN A`-4 OFGOVER MINTS 0 ems 1810 MAIN ST ' P 0 DRAWER 11 Ea FLORENCE,AZ 85232 .� ;;:;;;:8 April 1, 1980 RGION Mayor Virginia Seeman P. 0. Box K Apache Junction, AZ. 85220 Dear Mayor__Seeman, At its meeting on March 26, 1980, CAAG Regional Council voted unanimously to continue participation in providing cash match for the CAAG Title XX planning contract in FY 81 (October 1, 1980 - Septe,,fiber 30, 1981). I would like to take this opportunity to notify you that the cash match required for the City of Apache Junction will be $871.00. This amount is due and payable at any time before July 1, 1981. Some letters will be accompanied by a billing for the current fiscal year cash match. This is being done only for those entities which have not paid the cash match to date. • If you should have any questions on this matter, please feel free to call me or Peggy Notzon at 868-5878. Sincerely, ohn A. Blackburn 94 Executive Director JAB/lb GILA COUNTY.GLOBE HAYDEN.MIAMI PAYSON,SAN CARLOS,WINKELMAN P!NAI (MINTY APACWF IIINCTIf1N l'AVA(-RANfF f(1f11 IPCF FI f1Y FI f1RFNCF KFARNY MAMAMf1TW CIIPFRIf1R RQLL_CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF S1*0 MOTION BY: `( SECONDED BY : 0' YF S ^Yf ABS T A I N COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN DAM IANO COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN URCESS ' COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE-IAYOR GRANILLO ' ` MAYOR SEEMAN ✓ 4 r UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: c: ITEM NO. 3- BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIA APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT 0 /$871. 15 FOR THE CITY'S CASH MATCH SHARE FOR THE CAAG TITLE XX NG CONTRACT IN FY 1981, BE AND IS HEREBY APPROVED, FOR APPROVAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF 47* MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YFS Nn ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN SHANKS_ COUNCILMAN BIJRGFSS COUNCILMAN FinSON COUNCILMAN H i i L COUNCILMAN PAMIANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, S BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $871, FOR THE CITY'S CASH MATCH SHARE FOR THE CAAG TITLE XX PLANNING CONTRACT IN FY 1981, BE AND IS HEREBY DENIED, FOR DENIAL PQACHE✓Gy .•. ... • U TZ !;441 ;:;* gR,zONP C9pache unction ITEM No. i4M?nO4/t CH •.TlJ/��. P:!„•'C HEARING c: , 1s!NESS FOR AG'' A OF -! 7/46 April 28, 1980 ✓ pl ;v CUSiNESS INFO/ REPORTS - - - - - -CI MANAGER TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGE FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE #48 (PZ-7-80) The Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on May 7, 1980, .o. and considered in public hearing the request of certain property owners in a portion of the "Azure Skies Subdivision" the rezoning of lots 13-39, 52-73, and 86 through 112 inclusive. The requested rezoning was from Trailer Homesite (TH) to Single Family Residence (CR-3) . The Planning Commission had approved this requested rezoning by Commission Initiative in that a majority of the property owners within the subdivision had re- quested by petition the Commission Initiative. The property owners were represented by Mr. Raymond E. Foisy, 449 S. Gold Drive in Apache Junction. During the public hearing the following points were made: 1. The subject lots all comply with the CR-3 zoning district require- ments as to lot size and setbacks. 2. The development of the lots within the subject area are exclusively single family homes. 3. A majority of the property owners within the area are requesting the rezoning on the basis that the rezoning classification would accurately reflect the development of the area to date. The Planning and Zoning Commission passed the following motion unanimously by roll-call vote. "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in Rezoning Case PZ-7-80 (Proposed Ordinance #48) that the request to rezone lots 13 through 39, 52 through 73, and 86 through 112 inclusive of the Azure Skies Subdivision, from Trailer Homesite (TH) to Single Family Residence (CR-3) be recommended for approval to the City Council ." The Director of Planning concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Proposed Ordinance 048 will be before the City Council 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 Aft. Amok page 2 - Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council at this meeting for first reading only. You will have a public hearing scheduled on this request for your meeting of May 21, 1980. Oak ORDINANCE NO. 48 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PARCELS LOCATED IN APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (CR-3) , SAID PARCELS BEING THE SUBJECT OF REZONING CASE PZ-7-80; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance by changing the zoning district classification in Zoning Case PZ-7-80 for the parcels of land described as lots 13 through 39, 52 through 73, and 86 through 112 inclusive, be ,.� and hereby is changed from Trailer Homesite (TH) to Single Family Resi- dence (CR-3) . SECTION II REPEALING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinance and parts of ordinances in conflict with the pro'risions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein be reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of compentent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Am bk. __ Ordinance No. 48 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 1980. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk oink APPROVED AS TO FORM: ‘C) a52)C-0-4-3 City Attorney siwk REZONING PZ — 7 — 80 r'ti U s N/GHwAV 60 A a � a AZURE SKIES SUBDIVISION (ALL TN zow.n/�) ...... r, 4tt Ave. �2. Yo 5! 7y SC "3 i3 39 a 73 et iiz ck W A M q ,s Q tal V Z 14 6 e 1- N J NI w " o Li V 1 v,l G✓ 214 0 AD wq Y A`/C .� No S CAc.et" ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAIN -COUNCILMAN _D • COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN E IASON • COUNCILMAN HILL VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO • MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 48 FOR THE FIRST READING, QACNNs, — O 4R/Z•ONP EMT ity o � pache unction I-:L.' RI G OLJ 3U:!;MESS FOR „v_.4J,�► OF �/7lo ...,.. ..� NEW COSINESS April 30, 1980 INFO/REPORTS -------- ' 1 .r MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGE)3�, FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 44,012 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.41 (PZ-6-80) The Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and consid- ered proposed Ordinance No.41, relating to Section 2705 entitled "Fees" in the Zoning Ordinances. This section supercedes the Building Code fees schedule found in Table 3-A of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) . This .•. proposal would delete the fees from the Zoning Ordinances. The City Council would then have the option of ratifying, by resolution, the fees as found in the UBC. The Commission felt that it could not just consider the elimination of a fee without considering the substitution that might take place. The Com- mission passed the following recommendation by a 6-3 vote: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that it recommends to the City Council the approval of Ordinance No. 41 (PZ-6-80) . Further, it is recommended that the Building Official be instructed to use Table No. 3-A "Building Permit Fees" as found in the currently adopted Uniform Building Code (1979 Edition) , but that the schedule of fees be adjusted not to exceed seventy percent (70%) of the scheduled amount, and that the immediate implementation not exceed fifty percent (50%) , and the distribution be subject to review." The Commission was presented information as to three methods of deter- mining the cost for performing the building inspection/plans review service. The methods included budget analysis, experience of other cities in the area, and analyzing the average cost as applied to Table 3-A in the UBC. Each of the methods resulted in approximately the same figures. The conclusion staff derives is that by using a seventy percent (70%) modified to table 3-A of the UBC, the cost of performing the service would be equated. If a percentage less than 70% is used, the tax payer would be subsidizing the service. If a higher percentage is used, then monies beyond the cost of service would be derived by the city. Mr. Frazier will be available to answer specific questions. 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 ORDINANCE NO. 41 /11IN AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING SECTION 2705 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE: PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, FINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I IN GENERAL Section 2705 entitled "Fees" of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Apache Junction is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by ref- erence, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV: EMERGENCY CLAUSE Whereas, it is necessary for the preservation of the peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 1980. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : I YES NO I ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN _ I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: J ITEM NO, 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 41 FOR THE FIRST READING, ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF 5/7( 0 MOTION BY: "(9 SECONDED BY: P t' YES 4Q ABSTA I N COUNCILMAN EIDSON. • COUNCILMAN SHANKS_ ✓ COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO • MAYOR SEEMAN _ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, g BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVICE1. BE HELD ON THE 21ST DAY OF MAY, 1980, AT 6:00 P.M, 1644 1r, O�` P,QPay,NE:/), f /lk "IRIZ©W'' Wily On c94pache &unction APRIL 29, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: BILL MCDANIEL, DIRECTOR OE PUBLIC SAFE'1Y FROM: G. RAY LEE, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: COMMENDATION Putt[ng together a full-service police agency is a major task. It requires a great deal of experttse. You must be commended for doing an outstanding job of meeting your goals and objectives in a timely manner and in the best interest of the Department and the public. Your expeditious ^ manner in setting forth policy and being instrumental in influencing the adoption of the extremely valuable twenty-year retirement program is definitely an enhancement to our City. Another very commendable action on your part was the requisitioning of six Highway Patrol vehicles at a fraction of the cost on the open market. The citizens of this City are fortunate to have a Director of your caliber leading the Public Safety Department. . RAY L CITY MANAGER pac 150 NORM OCOTILLO • POST 044•Ok 3O* K.APACHE JUNCTION AR'2ONA 357 • TELEPHONE. '6C2) 062,5154 'Y7 - UtktV. 1,1—:49)::r Amm,, . .`'`, �JZO r 's ? iq of o4ac/ie 2unctwn - APRIL 25, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: RICH BRO'tAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: G. RAY LEE, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: COORDINATION OF CITY HALL MOVE I would like to thank you for the excellent manner in which you have coordinated the operation of our move to the new City Hall site. The prompt acquisition of the land and expedient construction was due largely to your efforts and hard work. Further, your attempts to get the best prices available on this project are appreciated as successful efforts to protect the public's interests. The City consideres you an asset and we feel very fortunate to have a gentleman of your caliber on the employee rolls. G.RAY LEE CITY MANAGER pac 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OfRICE $0Y K.APACHE JUNCTION ARtZONA S522O • TELE?1-ICNE ;602)982 6154 PQACHE JGy �. ... ►.. .,ter, 0 0 , 'z .., ,t,„ ,,,„ . ,‘„.,:,, ;Will qR/ZONP Wily o 5 I` pac/ze 2unctian IIMk April 30, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manage FROM: Joseph W. Gero, Director of Planning ' SUBJECT: Community Attitude Survey-Preliminary Information FOR YOUR INFORMATION Am . During the last week-end the Community Attitude Survey was successfully conducted. Approximately 200 households selected randomly re- sponded, generally with these persons welcoming the opportunity to comment. Several households selected to no participate. Interestingly, the students became aware of a substantial misconception in the community. That misconception is that the City is levying a property tax. I inquired at the Pinal County Assessor's Office and learned the following in the distributation of taxes collected based on $100 valuation: State of Arizona $ 0.48 Pinal County 3.938 Apache Junction Unified School District 6.5047 Pinal County Jr. College 1.4452 Township Fire Department 0.6831 Central Arizona Project 0.03 Mary O'Brien School 0.0895 (Pinal County Handicapped) Superstition Villa light district 0.6053 Apache Villa light district 0.5461 oak APPROVED ON ---�.� s/1. ITEM No. _9 PUBLIC I-:EARIN G FOR AGENDA OF-5/2/44 ___ . OLD EUSINESS _ NEW BUSNESS • -...- - INFO/ REPORTS CITY MANA R 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 -2- Auk I was told that persons wishing to check the tax distributation could by looking at the right hand side of the tax statement and seeing the letter key on the back. With regard to the Survey, the results, are being key punched and will then be computer tabulated. When the results are available they will be sent to you. PQp,CHF JGti O 0 U = ..., �RI ZONP ity C pache Ounction April 30, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joseph W. Gero, Director of Planning EAU SUBJECT: Town Hall Meeting - May 17, 1980 FOR YOUR INFORMATION The first Town Hall Meeting and Community Development was a tremendous success and those present learned much about issues that will effect the growth and development of this city. The second meeting is scheduled for May 17, 1980 at Gold Dust Mobile Home Park located at 202 N. Meridian in the Recreation Building. The agenda is: 8:00 - 8:15 Opening Remarks 8:15 - 9:15 Developing a Housing Shortage 9:15 - 9:30 Coffee 9:30 - 10:30 Role of Alternative Housing 10:30 - 11:30 Of Time and Leisure 11:30 - 11:45 Coffee 11:45 - 12:45 Schools and Growth 12:45 - 2:15 Luncheon and Speaker, subject to be announced 2:15 - 3:15 The Federal Role in Housing 3:15 - 3:30 Where We Go From Here In that we must make reservations for lunch, please contact our office no later than noon, Wednesday, May 14 with whether you will be in attendance. ITEM No. ________/_ -- APPROVED ON PU^JC '-EARJNG FOR AG=NDA OF ---- �� CLL.) BUSINESS __ NEW BUSINESS ------ --- - --- .,.�.,...,v.-., INFO/REPORTS CITY MANAGER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE 80X K APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 (::s)ACHF •.G O ' -,t't ,5t.t-' R AMik gRIZOO* V itt' o & pache 09unction April 30, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manage FROM: Joe Gero, Director of Planning and Zoning.... h SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance #46 FOR YOUR INFORMATION s+� The Planning and Zoning Commission has scheduled a public hearing on the proposed Ordinance for May 20, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. in the County Complex Building. ITEM No. - 9-------- APPROVED ON _%.5---/'b --- PU'!_`.0 !-TA RING �,�7/80 ---- -- O':i i?USJNESS FOR AGENDA OF — NEW 6JSiNESS I-- ...,,----.... INFO/REPORTS CITY M AGER _ .. 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 ORDINANCE NO. 46 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING SECTIONS 803, 805, AND 2001 (e) (11) , AND 2103 (a) ; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: IN GENERAL 1. Amend Section 803 of Article 8 - General Rural Zone, to read as follows: "Section 803 MINIMUM LOT AREA: One and one-fourth acres." 2. Amend Section 805 of Article 8 - General Rural Zone, to read as follows: "Section 805 MINIMUM LOT AREA PER DWELLING UNIT: One and one-fourth acres." 3. Amend Section 2001 (e) (11) in Article 20-TH Trailer Homesite Zone to read as follows: "11 . A Mobile Home or Travel Trailer Park and Mobile Home or Travel Trailer subdivision of ten (10) or more acres sh<.?l be screened around its periphery except for gates or access ways by an opaque solid fence or wall of not less than five feet (5') nor more than six (6') of height, measured on the fence from out- side of the park." 4. Amend Section 2103 (a) to read as follows: "a. In any CR-5, TR, CB-1 , CB-2, CI-1 or CI-2 zone, where parking space is required, the surface of such space shall be treated and maintained in a manner to prevent dust from arising therefrom." SECTION II: PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, ^ are hereby repealed. SECTION III: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. an► Amok Ordinance No. Page 2 Amok PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 1980. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney gACHZ JGti .•. I 1014P' &2pacIie dunction April 28, 1930 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joe Gero, Director of Planning Executive Secretary, Board of Adjustment SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Minutes FOR YOUR INFORMATION Enclosed you will find copies of approved "MINUTES" from a recent meeting of the Board of Adjustment. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. Board of Adjustment meeting April 7, 1980 JWG:an APPROVED ON - /44 ITEM No. 9 .......�, %��� (J PUBLIC HEARING FOR AGENDA OF .__ OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS CITY MANAGER INFO/REPORTS 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,AR1ZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 _ p MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION APRIL 7, 1980 Amok 7:00 p.m. In Attendance Regrets Joe Jessamine, Chairman Don Nesser, Vice Chairman Bill Furness Pete Nunn Bill Vaughn Joe Gero, Exec. Sec. Jackie LaCount, Secretary Guests About 50 persons 1. Mr. Jessamine opened the meeting at 7:05 p.m. , welcoming (Chairman) those present and requesting the roll call of members. 2. Mr. GeroAnk (Exec. Sec.) called the roll and determined all five members to be present as indicated above. 3. Chairman declared that there was a quorum present at this meeting. He noted there is one set of "Minutes" dated March 17, 1980, before the Board. 4. Nesser/Nunn M/S BE IT RESOLVED the "Minutes" dated 3=I7-80 be approved as written. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 5. Chairman announced there is three public hearings tonight being #BA-4-80, BA-5-80, and BA-6-80. He opened the public hearings and asked Mr. Gero, Executive Secretary, to present a re- port on #BA-4-80 being the first case. 6. Mr. Gero gave the location of the request and stated the case has been properly advertised. He stated this request is to allow variances of setbacks to complete construction of car- port, Lot 66, "Azure Skies", also known as 641 S. Gold Drive, and to allow the required parking to be placed in the front yard setback. 7. Chairman opened the hearing to the public for comment. 8. Mrs. Luddy spoke on behalf of her husband and herself. She said they had made every effort to comply Page 2 - Board c 4djustment ,ri, by the law. She stated the error was made of giving them a permit by the Building Official/Zoning Administrator. Mrs. Luddy said she had several signatures signed by ,m, adjacent residents not objecting to the carport. 9. Resident spoke in disfavor of the petition stating that property value could be harmed if allowed to remain. 10. Chairman asked Mr. Gero if there were any instructions to the Board. 11. Mr. Gero read from the Zoning Ordinance the questions which the Board of Adjustment must answer to prior to making a motion. 12. Chairman declared a short recess. Meeting resumed at 8:00 p.m. with the Chairman asking Mr. Gero for a recommendation. 13. Mr. Gero noted that the City Code provides specific remedy in case of an error by the Building Official and that process has correctly been carried out by Mr. Frazier. The Luddy's are not contesting the Building Officials decision. They are seeking two variances as stated above. The Luddy's had the home built and are the original occupants. They caused the enclosing of one parking space for a hobby shop area and the other space is by the owner's choice a patio area. Unless the owner provides one on-site parking space not included in the front setback area, the applicant would be violating the Zoning Ordinance. The remedy would be to use the on-site area for parking as the other neighbors must also do. If the above is accomplished then there is no need for the carport. Other than sentiment for error there is no distinguishing reason to separate the applicant from his neighbor with regard to the setback. Further, the applicant submitted plans for the carport which were in error showing the setback from the curb line which is not the property line. The applicant indicates they made inquiry but they didn't identify where the property line was. At issue is whether the Board will be able to distinguish this case from future similar requests. Therefore, I recommend denial of the request. 14. Chairman noting that nobody else wished to speak closed Page 3 - Board of 4justment the public hearing. 1 15. Nesser/Furness M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in case BA-4-80, application of George Luddy to allow a front yard setback and parking area to be within 7 feet of the property line for his property located at 641 S. Gold Drive, and described as W700 feet of E1/2 WZ SA EZ SW1/4 and E WZ W WZ G&SRB&M in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, that the request be denied and that the decision of the Building Official be affirmed. The reasons for the decision are: 1. There is no unique hardship shown. The applicant, who has been the sole owner of the property, made a previous decision to enclose the parking area as a convenience to himself. 2. The City Code provides the remedy when an error is committed by the Building Official. That procedure has been correctly followed. p 3. The applicant submitted a site sketch which is in error assuming the curb line to be the property line. The motion failed by a 2-3 vote with Messers Nesser and Furness voting for the motion. 16. Vaughn/Nunn M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of—the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in case BA 4-80, application of George Luddy to allow a front yard setback and parking area to be within 7 feet of the property line for his property located at 641 S. Gold Drive and described as W700 feet of El W1 SW4 E- SW1 & Ez W1 W12 WZ G&SRB&M in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona that the request be approved and that the Building Official be directed to remove the "stop work order." The reasons for the decisions are: 1. The special circumstance is that a p Building Permit had been issued in error. 2. The hardship is that the applicant has made substantial expense to construct the carport based on the city approval of the Building Permit. 3. The carport location will not be harmful to the public health, safety Page 4 - Board o3justment and general welfare. The neighbor's view will not be harmed due to the placement of landscaping. Adak I The motion passed 3-2 with Messers Jessamine, Nunn and Vaughn voting for the motion. 17. Chairman opened the public hearing and asked Mr. Gero, Executive Secretary, to present a report on case BA-5-80. 18. Mr. Gero gave the location of the request and stated the case has been properly advertised. The applicant is requesting certain variances in setbacks and space sizes to allow completion of the park and use of property known as Big Mountain Mobile Home Park located at 1100 S. Warner Drive, in compliance with a plan prepared prior to the adoption of Pinal County and City of Apache Junction's Zoning Ordinances. 19. Chairman opened the hearing to the publicfor comment. 20. Mr. Gruner requested that variances be approved for the .�.. existing developed area which would allow existing units to remain in their locations. Further, he is requesting that for the area yet to be developed, that the rear setback be re- duced to the same as other units along the westerly property line, but meeting all other setbacks, He stated there are no fire hydrants within 800 feet of the furthest point of the park, and there are no swimming pools in close prox- imity. 21. Mr. Gero recommended that in view of the change by Mr. Gruner with regard to the setbacks that the portion yet to be developed be held over and that Mr. Gruner furnish a site plan for the area. With regard to the already developed area, this area should be approved. 22. Vaughn/Nunn M/S to give approval to use the existing developed area of Big Mountain Mobile Home Park located at 1100 S. Warner Drive, as currently developed. Further, to continue the public hearing on the remaining portion of Big Mountain to 7:00 p.m. April 21,1980, and requiring the owner to submit a site plan for the said area. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. Page 5 - Bd.of, ldjustment i. 23. Chairman Opened the public hearing and asked Mr. Gero, Executive Secretary, to pre- sent a report on case #3 being BA-6-80. 24. Mr. Gero gave the location of the request and stated the case has been properly adver- tised. The applicant is requesting certain variances to allow use of land subdivided before Pinal County and Apache Junction Zoning Ordinances were effective. Lot 19, Lomastro Subdivision. Section 19, Township 1N R8E. 25. Mr. Sullivan spokesman for Mr. Castelli stated the Castelli's wish to use their property similar to other persons in the area. 26. Mr. Gero recommended that the Board approve the request made by Mr. Castelli in that the area is so established. 27. Chairman noting that nobody wished to speak for or against the case closed the public hearing. 28. Nesser/Furness M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjust- 1 ment of the City of Apache Junction that in case BA-6-80, application of James Castelli, under zoning ordinance Section 2309, to use a pre-existing non-conforming lot being Lot 19, Lomastro subdivision in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, that the said lot may be used as other lots in the subdivision requiring the setbacks be no greater than the least set- backs as established in the subdivision on the effective date of this action; further stipulating that other lots within the said subdivision may likewise be developed." Motion passed unanimously. 29. Board adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Joseph J� Gero Executive Secretary Approved: `.doe Jessamine� Chairman • /;;,1zOO zt y o fc4eipache &unc1ion April 30, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council TZ-IRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joe Cero, Director of Planning Executive Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Minutes FOR YOUR INFORMATION ON Enclosed you will find copies of approved "MINUTES" from a recent meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. Please have the original "Minutes" inserted in the "minutes" book. Thank you. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, April 14, 1980 JWC:an APPR&VE O ;.;5 � R74- No• PUBUC "!FARING OIS � � OLD lS;NESS FOR AC-,EPJ�A OF .7.-� .__ _ NEW ttUS1NESS INFO/ REPORTS CITY MANAGER t;; No+2fh°cook.° • POST OFHCE EuX K JUNCTION AJ212 DNA 8-32-20 • TELEPHONE(6C2)982-6154 /^ MINUTFS 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION April 14, 1980 7:00 p.m. In Attendance Regrets George Baljo, Chairman Susan Sharp (business) Mildred Baker Roy Hudson John Hutchens Ron Kell Richard Oltman Sims Strickler Ilene Taylor Joe Gero, Executive Secretary Althea Nunn, Secretary Guests About 25 persons, including Councilman Tom Damiano 1. Mr. Baljo opened the meeting at 7:08 p.m. , welcoming those present Chairman and requesting the roll call of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined eight of the nine members to be present as indicated above. 3. Chairman declared a quorum present at the meeting, noted there were two sets of "Minutes" dated March 18th and March 24th, 1980, and suggested they be moved to the end of the meeting. 4. Chairman announced the public hearing opened on PZ-4-80 and asked the Executive Secretary to brief those present. 5. Mr. Gero briefed those present on PZ-4-80, (Ordinance No. 45) stating it is a request from Mr. Marvin Halbert, enabled by, Commission Initiative, to establish initial zoning for Gold Dust Mobile Home Park, the park having been annexed to the City effective February 16, 1980. He directed the Commission's attention to the map of Gold Dust Mobile Home Park and pointed out undeveloped areas that would have to conform to City requirements in order to be improved. At the present time there is 15.4 acres developed. The park generally equals or exceeds the setbacks established by the City of Apache Junction, in that many of Maricopa County's requirements are greater than the City requirements. -2- /"\ON . There are a number of sites which apparently do not have permits from Maricopa County, or have partial permits. There are a number of sites within the de- veloped area which are vacant, or have stored units upon them. At the time of hook-up those sites should have to only meet those requirements the rest of the developed area has provided where_the requirements do not exceed the City Zoning Ordinance requirements. Mr. Halbert has submitted a request to the City Council asking the rezoning be considered with the emergency clause. 6. Haze Burch Attorney representing the applicant, stated the owners are anxious to begin development of the two areas of the park. As indicated on the site map, Mr. Halbert has made substantial financial commitment to the rest of the park which is already constructed, and has secured financing for this new development. Mr. Al Shumate, a partner is present also to answer questions. 7. Commission inquired as to the following: 1. Question: What is the Park occupancy rate at this time9 Answer: About 75-80% full (Halbert) 2. Question: Why has Maricopa County alleged certain zoning regulation violations as set forth in their letter? Answer: Their appears to be an error on the part of Maricopa County officials as to what per- mits have or have not been issued. However, Mr. Halbert would be glad to comply with requirements of the City to secure permits. (Burch) 3. Question: Why is the emergency clause requested9 Answer: Park developers have made considerable investments to date. In order to make a return they must be competitive and ready to do business when the fall visitores arrive. This necessitates obtaining permits at this time and getting the work done. Mr. Halbert began this process in the fall of 1979. Noting nobody else wished to speak for or against the request the public hearing was closed. -3- 8. Kell/Oltman M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission ,/, of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona that in Zoning Case PZ-4-80 application of Marvin Halbert, by Commission Initia- tive, to establish the initial zoning classification as Trailer Homesite (TH) of the Gold Dust Mobile Home Park, a parcel of land described as: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section Twenty- four (24) TIN, G&SRB&M, thence South 355.09 feet to the true point of beginning, thence West 660.5 feet thence South 1785.04 feet, thence East 361.3 feet, thence North 300 feet, thence East 300 feet, thence North 1,485. 18 feet to the true point of beginning containing twenty-five (25) acres more or less. and also known as 202 N. Me-idain Road that the initial zoning be approved as Trailer Homesite (TH) subject to: 1. That the park owner apply for and gain approval from the Building Official within ninety (90) days from the date of approval by the City Council of the zoning classification for those sites not having a valid building permit but which are being occupied for residential purposes. (at least sites 7, 26, 28, 52 and possibly 9 and 31) . 2. That setbacks established in areas already developed shall be granted "grandfather" variances. And at the time of hook-up of units in already developed areas, the mobile homes shall have to only meet these requirements consistent to the rest of the developed area, provided no limit shall be required to exceed the City Zoning Ordinance requirements. The reasons for the recommendation are: 1. The Mobile Home Park is an established park 2. The granting of approval would subject the owner to obtaining in a reasonable time these outstanding building permits which are to protect the public health, safety and general welfare 3. The Mobile Home Park is generally developed in • compliance with Article 20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Further, the Commission recommends to the City Council that in establishing the initial zoning classification that this be done declaring an emergency in that the procedures have been rather lengthy and by such procedure the owner would then be permitted to proceed in an orderly fashion to meet the upcoming season requirements. -4- /IN The motion Passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 9. Chairman announced the public hearing on PZ-7-80, Commission Imitative, a request of certain homeowners for rezoning a portion of the subdivision known as Azure Skies, and asked for Executive Secretary to brief those present. 10. Mr. Gero stated this request is being heard through Commission Initiative for rezoning lots 13-39, 52-73 and 86-112, inclusively, from Trailer Homesite zoning to Single Family Residence (CR-3). He also noted the owner of certain vacant lots had signed the petition. 11 . R .' rnisv spoke in behalf of certain homeowners of the Azure Skies subdivision, outlining why they would like to be rezoned. Las'cally they do not want to have the possibility of mobile 'cores being placed in an area developed on single family homes. 12. Ni . Gero stated the area would comply with the CR-3 zoning requirements and is developed in such a manner that it has the appearance of having already been so zoned. He recommedned the rezoning and noted this is one of those areas where rezoning would establish property values in compliance with zoning. 13. Chairman inquired if anyone else desired to speak. Noting none, the public hearing was closed. 14. Hudson/ M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of Baker the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-7-80 (proposed Ordinance #44) that the request to rezone lots 13-39. 52-73, and 86-112 inclusive of the Azure Skies Subdivision, from Trailer Homesite (TH) to Singh, Family Residence (CR-3) be recommended for approval to the City Council. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 15. Chairman announced public hearing on PZr6-SQ1 "Fees' schedule, and asked the staff to brief those present. 16. Building Official Leo Frazier reviewed current city Building permit fees1 the fees in the UBC, the fees changed in surrounding cities and stated the Building Department is losing $120Q a month: in salaries alone because of the low permit fees, Re also pointed out the inaccuracies in other portions of the fee schedule, that for instance, a Building permit fee to construct a fence would cost more than the fee to construct a house. He would like to see the Building Department generally on a self supporting basis. -5- 17. Commission inquired into the following: Question: How do the city building permit fees compare with Pinal County fees? Answer: They do not compare. The county does not administer a building code program. Their fee is a zoning site review re- quiring less work and their fees are lower. (Frazier) Mr. Laabs responded that the County fee is about 500% that of the City. Question: Does the Commission set or recommend fees, or are they limited to recommending on proposed Ordinance No. 41? Answer* The Commission's task is to recommed on proposed Ordinance #41. However, it would be unfair to require a recommendation be made without informing the Commission as to the consequences of the action and allowing them to make a recommendation should they choose. Question: Inquiry was made as to what the 65% fee for plans review on mobile homes will cover. Answer: New state law has established a flat fee of $40, ani the City now is a participant of the program. This new law supersedes the recommendation. 18. Mr. Hudson stated he thought the cost of inspection program should not be paid by the taxpayers, but by the people needing the service. Question: What is the number of inspections required for a new home? Answer: Usually 5-8. -5- 19. Joe Morvak commented building permits should cover expenses of the building department, however, because of interest rates it is too large an increase at this time: 1000 sq. ft. the fee would be $150. FHA requires 5 inspections. Suggests reinspection fee if it is not ready for in- spection when inspector arrives. 20. Mr. Laabs stated that before any fees are set there could be a projection of the budget needs of the Building Department. A1so,they could come up with a preliminary cost estimate of what is going to be done next year. They should be able to come up with adjusted formula before the figure is set. 21. Mr. Kell Is it proper to call for a wc :k session and come up with something possibly mote workable9 22. Mr. Gero advised the Commissionto make a motion to continue public hearing if they decide on a work session. He indicated a need for reasonable fees as expeditiously as possible. The city, being new, does not have a track record as far as budget goes. The UBC establisheda fee based on eiN national experience for cost. An Arizona multiplier of 92% has been established. This proposal calls for a 70% fee, 22% under the Arizon-i multiplier. 23. Hudson/Kell M/S to continue the public hearing on Proposal Ordinance to April 29, 7:00 p.m. in this same location. The staff is requested to prepare more information and call a work session. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 24. Chairman noted the next item to be Noralta Acres Subdivision in Pinal County and called upon the Executive Secretary. 25. Mr. Gero responded the concerns of the Director of Public Works and Fire Chief. Be noted these have been discussed with Mr. Clarke and the items seemed agreeable. He recommended the subdivision for approval to Pinal County but attaching the comments. 0061 -7- 26. Hudson/Strickler M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that it recommends to Pinal County the Noralta Acres subdivision for approval. Further, the comments of the Director of Public Works and Town- ship Fire Chief are to be attached and Pinal County is requested to make due considerably of these items. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 27. Recess 9:50 - 9:55 p.m. 28. Chairman called upon the Executive Director to brief those present on proposed rezoning PZ-8-80 Peralta investments in Pinal County. 29. Mr. C ro stated the applicant had been invited. The request was located on a map at Superstition Freeway west of Goldfield Road. With a interchange at Hwy. 60 just east of the site, it doesn't appear Goldfield wauld go through at this location, thereby having CB-2 on a dead-end street. The land is currently zoned Suburban Homesite (SH) . The applicant is requesting another 80 acres be rezoned TH. The Commission is aware of the figures already developed on the acreages vacant but zoned TH. I recommend denial on both of the above. 30. Hutchens/Kell M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in Pinal County case PZ-8-80 Parcel #1 SH to CB-2 (10 acres) N1/2 N1 SEA Sec. 34 TIN-R8E Parcel #2 SH to TH (80 acres) S=2 SEA Sec. 34 TIN-R8E All in Pinal County be recommended to Pinal County for denial. -8- The reasons are: 1 . The CB-2 would be on a dead-end street and therefore not have good commercial use access or exposure. 2. The TH would generate more acreage for mobile home or RV use in an already saturated land use zoning district classification. Reference was made to the City previous letter on this subject (re: Irby Cain). The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 31. Chairman called upon the Executive Director to brief those present on updated information on Ironwood Sands preliminary approval. 32. Mr. Gero referred to his letter of April 2, 1980, and requested the Commission appto,,e the adjustments to the sub- division as set forth. with regard to the covenants, the city attorney is still reviewing a recommendation on these matters. 33. Mr. Clarke stated, as per his letter, the developer is in aggre- meat with the request. 34. Hutchens/Oltman M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of-the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Ironw000d Lands Subdivision preliminary approval be amended by: 1. Removing the requirement for key parking areas on lots 1, 32, 33, 62, and 93 and placing in lieu thereof a one foot vehicular non-trespass easement on the west property lines. 2. Sidewalks, on the periphery streets and within the subdivision shall be provided to city specifications. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 1 0141 -9- 35. Mr. Gero requested a Commission policy on how to handle rezoning request in Maricopa County within the Zone of influence in view of the Mesa strip annexation to the county line. 36. Commission directed staff to present all requests within one mile of city with researched recommendations. All others to be presented and Commission will handle deciding howin depth it cares to issue a recommendation, if any. 37. Mr. Gero presente ' a proposed 80 acre Mobile Home Park at Broadway- and Signal Butte and sugguested this would only add to the already over abundance of such land uses in tb- area. (Trails West) Tie company has a good reputation for. development. 38. Taylor/Baker M/S BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission "of—the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that it recommend to Maricopa Co-nty the denial of "Trail W st" at this time due to the saturation of undeveloped but zoned land for such purposes existing in the service area. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 39. Commission determined to make no recommendation on Smitty's due to the distance from the city. 40. Commission discussed several zoning ordinance text changes proposed by the staff. 41. Taylor/Baker M/S to authorize a Commission initiate amending erections 803, 805, 2001 , and 2103 of the Zoning Ordinance. (see attached) 42. Kell/Taylor M/S to consider "Minutes" dated March 18 and March 24 at the next regular meeting and to adjourn. -10- The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 43. Commission Adjourned at 11:00 p.n. Respectfully submitted, Joseph W. Cero Executive Secretary Aft\I Approved: George A. Baljo Chairman ! CK i -- 1/( , Oak 01.4 .� .1Z--� ''et y on &l pache Ounciton April 30, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joe Gero, Director of Planning Executive Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Minutes FOR YOUR INFORMATION Imk Enclosed you will find copies of approved "MINUTES" from a recent meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. Please have the original "Minutes" inserted in the "minutes" book. Thank you. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, March 18, 1980 JWG:an ITEM No. ___ OIN APPROVED 03,I _ PU1 C HEARING OLD BUSINESS FOR AGENDA OF`�Z _ _ NEW BUSINESS �'__. INFO/REPORTS CITY lAANAGER 160 M ai;H OCC fl1 0 • PC.x.i7 L)F C, BOX K,A?'.`NE ALMCTION 1,2ZONA 3320 • TELE?SOME (, )952 6154 MINUTES Awl 11/4 PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA PINAI COUNTY COMPLEX MARCH 18, 1980 7:00 P.M. Imkk In attendance George Baljo, Chairman Mildred Baker Roy Hudson Richard Oltman Susan Sharp Sims Strickler Ilene Taylor Joe Gero, Executive Secretary Guest About 20 persons, including Councilman Tom Damiano. 1. Mr. Baljo opened the meeting at 7:09 p.m. welcoming those present Chairman and requesting the roll call of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined all seven members to be present as indicated above. 3. Chairman declared- a quorum present at the meeting. He noted there were three sets of "Minutes" dated January 14, 1980; February 25, 1980; and March 10, 1980 and requested a motion as to the "Minutes". 4. Sharp/Baker M/S to approve as circulated "Minutes" dated January 14, 1980• February 25, 1980; and March 10, 1980. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 5. Chairman armour-cad that the next items would be the public hearing item PZ-1-80 (Ordinance 32) , PZ-2-80 (Ordinance #34) , a� PZ-3-80 (Ordinance #33) . He requested the Executive Secretary brief those present. 6. Mr. Gero stated the three ordinances form a package with Ordinance #32 amending the Zoning Ordinance fees schedule to include planned developments, Ordinance #33 to add a new section to permit planned development zoning, and Ordinance #34 which would revise the parking requirements of the City. The developmemt of these proposals are a result of efforts over many months by Planning and Zoning Commission mem- bers, Citizens' Advisory Committee Members and City staff. 7. Chairman asked if there were persons in the audience requesting to speak on the proposed ordinances. Two questions were raised and answered. They were: a. How would the planned development proposal affect the Palm Springs area for applying, including by Commission Initiative, for rezoning") -2- in, rr ANSWER: It would not at :It any applicants access to the possibility of a Commission Initiative. It was further explained that it would be up to the applicant to obtain the requisite 51% + signatures and that by carefully defining the area requested may make the application in certain instances an easier process. b. Would people having existing zoning be required to apply for the new zoning classification o.f Planned Development' ANSWER: No, obtaining a Planned Development zoning district is not mandatory. By its passage the City Council would only be authorizing the opportunity for a potential developer to apply for one more zoning district option. This option proposes more design flexibility. 8. Mr. Gero suggested the following amendments: ORDINANCE #33 page 3 - Section 33.03 Procedure in the first line by correcting the typographic error in the word "shall". page 3 - Section 33.03 Procedure, subsection lc by adding to the sentence the following words "as found in Section 2804 of the Zoning Ordinance". ORDINANCE #34 page 2 - Section 21.02 General Provisions #5 by deleting the section and placing the word "(reserved)" in lieu thereof. page 3 - Section 21.02 General Provisions by adding a new #8 to read: "8. When parking areas are provided on a separate lot, the front set back requirements shall be determined as if applied to a one story structure within the zoning district where it is located." page 3 - Section 21.03 Detailed Standards, subsection #1 by adding before the word "forty" the words "up to". page 4 - Section 21.03 Detailed Standards,subsection #9, by adding before the word "Bumper" the words "When installed." page 5 - Section 21.03 Detailed Standards, subsection #17 by .ak deleting the said subsection #17 and inserting a new subsection #17 to read: "17. No driveway in a front yard shall be more than twenty (20) feet wide and the front yard driveway shall not be used in calculating parking spaces. The Director of Public Works, (or Arizona Department of Transportation on State or federal highways) , may limit the number and location of curb cuts along a public right-of-way." -3- 9. Chairman noted there was no public comment either for or against the proposed ordinances, or the amendments and therefore closed the public hearings. He asked the Commission their direction. Ink 10. Oltman/Hudson MIS "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Az. that the Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of proposed Ordinance ft32." The motion passed unanimously by roll- call vote. 11. Hudson/Strickler M/S "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission the City of Apache Junction, Az. that Ow Commission recommends to the City Council the approval of proposed Ordinances 1#33 and 34 with the proposed changes as rec- ommended by the Executive Secretary." The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 12. Chairman announced the next agenda item to be a requested rezoning in. Pinal County just south of Apache Junction by Mr. Howell Anderson and asked the Executive Director to brief those present. 13. Mr. Gero indicated the site to be just west of Hawk Rock; to be approximately 30 acres; to be located in Section 6, R8E, TIS and although there are two proposed roads into the area (Huston and Guadalupe) they are currently not con- structed. 14. Mr. Anderson stated he was the applicant and that he is desirous of Applicant locating his truss building industry on the site among other uses. Water to the site is obtained from an ad- jacent well which he has an agreement to use the water. , . The capacity of the well is about seven (7) gallons per minute. He further stated he expects the extension of Guadalupe from the west by the end of the year. That is the direction a substantial amount of his business is located in. 15. Mr. and Mrs. indicated they were neighbors and also obtained t.Jater Womack from the same well. They had moved here and developed their home in an area they believed would remain in the desert landscape. They, therefore, objected to the re- zoning. 16. Mr. Gero presented the staff recommendations to approve the rezoning .0111. and stated several conditions which he requested be included. He also gave his reasons (see attached) . 17. Otman/S M/S to approve the rezoning as per attached motion "And< Strickler erson (Pinal County Rezoning Case PZ-4-80)". The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. AmIlk -4- 18. Chairman announce! the next ag—Ida item to be the requested approval of the Ironwood Sands preliminary plat. He requested the Executive Secretary to brief those present. 19. Mr. Gero noted that this is the first requested subdivision in the City. Lacking subdivision regulations, the City is using a letter of intent whereby the staff projects what it believes will be the regulations and the developer agrees to meet such considerations. Further, the developer agrees to meet any additional subdivision requirements if adopted. In this particular case, the plat is o.' file in the folder for case S-1-80, the subdivision of Ironwood Sands. Mr. Wendell Clarke is agent and a proper written power of attorney is in the file. Accompanying the plat is a staff letter stating concerns and a letter from Mr. Darrell Truitt replying in behalf of the developer. Mr. Truitt is the developers architect. The letters should be made a part of the record. He raise the following question and re;ueste-', through the Chairman that Mr. Clarke address his comments. a. (Streets #3) Will the church (corner of 16th and Ironwood on parcel noted "exception") dedicate and improve their street frontages? b. (Streets #5) Does the developer intend to install sidewalks? c. (Streets #7) The staff intends to require developers to install street name signs to city standards. d. (Streets #8) The staff intends to s_,ek a one-foot non-trespass easement generally on collectors or arterials of which Palo Verde falls in that classification. Respond. e. (General #1) What are the owners intention as to a sales office? f. (General #2) What are the owners intention as to signs? g. (General #4) Are recreation facilities planned? h. (General #6) Are covenents planned? If so would you please file a copy with P & Z for review? i. Will the subdivision be divided into stages? 20. Mr. Clarke responded that he is the agent for the applicant. With regard to the questions he answered: (letters refer to the above letters) . omik -5- a. The church will dedicate their right-of-way along both street frontages. The developer, at his cost, will construct the street improvements on 16th Ave. The church will have to install improvements along the frontage of Ironwood Drive. b. The developer does not intend to install sidewalks. c. The developer will install streetname signs as per City specifications. d. The developer would not like to have a one foot non-trespass easement as that cuts down some of the design capability. e. The owner has not expressed a sign intention. That could be covered at the time of development and is under the zoning ordinance. f. The developer has not decided on a sales office. g. No recreation facilities are to be provided. h. Covenants have been drafted and could be presented '"" to the Planning Office for inspection. i. The subdivision is to be built in one stage. 21. Mr. Baljo requested to know whether there would be a Home Owners Association. (Reference to Zoning Ordinance Section 2328 "Home Association".) 22. Mr. Clarke stated at this time none is planned. 23. Hudson/Oltman M/S to take a five (5) minute recess (@8. 55 p.m.) The motion passed unanimously. 24. Chairman Called the meeting back to order at 9:00 P.M. 25. Sharp/Hudson M/S "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Ironwood Sands Preliminary Plat (bounded by Ironwood, 16th, Palo Verde, and 20th) be and hereby is approved based upon the letter of intent submitted by the developer; further, provided the approval includes the staff letter dated i•. December 20, 1979 to Mr. Darrell Truitt, Mr. Truitt's reply by letter dated February 4, 1980, and is further subject to the following: a. The CCR's be filed with the Department of Planning and sent to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval. b. Street name signs shall be installed at the developers cost to City specifications. -6- c. That all rights-of-way, including the church be dedicated. (Note: No requirement for improvement of the church right-of-way was made.) d. The six southerly lots facing on Palo Verde shall ow* have non-trepass easements placed upon them. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 26. Chairman then stated the next item would be the Halbert rezoning and requested the Executive Secretary present a report. 27. Mr. Gero made reference to his memorandum dated March 18, 1980, on this subject. He noted: 1. Lacking a quorum and lacking a motion at a previous meeting to carry over to the next regularly scheduled meeting any advertised public hearing necessitates readvertising as required. 2. That the Zoning Ordinance does not specifically rec- ognize the process of establishing initial zoning upon annexation except by Commission Initiative. He recOmmended the Commission initiate establishing the Halbert zoning. 28. Sharp/Baker MIS "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Az. , that this Commission authorizes a Commission Initiative to consider establishing the initial zoning of Trailer Homesite (TH) for the Gold Dust Mobile Home Park located on Meridian Road at Boise Street and which was annexed to the City of Apache Junction effective February 16, 1980. The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 29. Hudson/Baker M/S to table to the next agenda (Monday '•larch 24, 1980) agenda items regarding APA membership and no quorum. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 30. Chairman noted that the resignation of Mr. Strange leaves the Commission without a Vice-Chairman and called for nomination. 31. Hudson/Strickler M/S that Susan Sharp be nominated for Vice-Chairman. Hearing no other nominations the question was closed and Ms. Sharp was elected unanimously by roll-call vote. 32. Mr. Hudson stated he has a conflict with Monday night meeting because of appointment to the local community college board. He wished to inquire if others would consider changing the meeting night. 33. Committee discussed the matter. Amk Ask -7- 34. Hudson/Baker M/S "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Comm Sion of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Commission recommends to the City Council a change in the required meeting time of the Planning and Zoning ImN Commission to be the second Tuesday of the Month at 7:00 p.m. All other meetings shall be on call of the Chairman or two members." The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 35. Strickler/ M/S to adjourn (at 9:45 p.m.) . Oltman The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. Respectfully submitted, Joseph W. Gero Executive Secretary emlk Approved: George A. Baljo Chairman ANDERSON (final County Rezoning Case PZ-4-80) BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Commission recommends to Pinal County's Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Supervisors the approval of the requested rezoning by Howell Anderson (Pinal County Rezoning Case PZ-4-80) of the property lescribed as SEti of Lot 10 and Ell of Lot 13, located on Pinal County Assessor's map 104-07 and being in Section 6, R8E, TIS being approximately 30 acres and located south of Apache Junction, Arizona, in Pinal County from SH zoning district to CI-2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning district. In addition to the recommendation to approve the rezoning the Commission requests the following points be responded to: 1. That proper access to the property be obtained in such a manner that future access be guaranteed. Further, consideration of future rights-of-way should be made. 2. That water service to the site for fire protection and other purposes be provided as per any regulations requiring such con- siderations. 3. That the property owner respond responsibly with regard to potential flood problems as witnessed by the several ravines OnIN crossing the property. 4. That the property owner consider making arrangements for fire protection service to the subject property. The reasons for the recommendations are: 1. The site is south of the proposed Superstition Freeway in an area generally undeveloped and which is being generally en- couraged for industrial development. 2 There is a scarsity of industrial zoned property leaving few alternatives for persons to develop industrial sites. 3. The considerations are to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and to provide for the orderly development of the area. tirE 0 CIA 1P/zoNP' 'oily pache Ounction April 30, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Joe Gero, Director of Planning Executive Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Minutes FOR YOUR INFORMATION Enclosed you will find copies of approved "MINUTES" from a recent meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. Please have the original "Minutes" inserted in the "minutes" book. Thank you. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, March 24, 1980 JWG:an rTn IN�/ aaMaasiWlHM� APPROVED rI PUBLIC kt a�Rlti FOR AQENr3 �rr/ .. OLD BUSINESS A C:� �` 7 NEW BUSINESS INEOLRE ORIB CITY MAtIAG _` 150 N,7,Ani OCOTILLO • POST Otr:CE SOX K.APA' F. 1UNCi'Cs; ARIZONA S-.2:20 • TE1EP1 O E (6.;2)9t2-6154 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA PINAL COUNTY COMPLEX March 24, 1980 7:00 P.M. In attendance Regrets George Baljo, Chairman Mr. Roy Hudson Mrs. Mildred Baker Mr. Richard Oltman Ms. Susan Sharp Mr. Sims Strickler Mrs. Ilene Taylor Joseph Gero, Executive Secretary Althea Nunn, Secretary Guests About 7 people in audience. 1. Mr. George Baljo opened the meeting at 7:05 p.m. Chairman welcomed those present and requested the roll call of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined six (6) of the seven members present. 3. Chairman declared a quorum present at the meeting. He noted there was one set of minutes dated 3-18-80, and suggested action be take:i on these later in the meeting. He stated the State law requires all cities to hold at least one public hearing on any rezoning case, and asked the Executive Secretary to brief those present on the details of the case before the Commission. 4. Mr. Gero presented the details of case PZ-5-80 for those present, stating the applicant, V.J. Buck would like to have his property rezoned from General Rural to CR4 to allow the construction of multiple residence, up to a four plex, at the rate of one dwelling unit per 3500 square feet of lot area. Zoning ordinance requires 16 feet minimum ,—w between units and further, in CR4 there are requirements of 35' in the rear, 8' on each side, and 25' on the front yard. 5. Mr. V.J. Buck speaking in his behalf stated he wished to build a duplex apartment, and noted he was on a section line road - Ironwood Drive. Question was asked regarding single family home and duplex already on lot? .•. "N. -2- Yes, two units already on lot. Question was asked , will you be able to meet those requirements considering units already on the lot? Yes. oink 6. Mr. Terwillinger stated he is the owner of lots 12 and 13 North of Mr. Buck. The lots are 200 feet across and neighbor 327 feet deep, and he would like to place units on these lots to coincide with Mr. Buck's plans. 7. Chairman asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition. None came forth. 8. Exec. Secretary recommendation to rezone from General Rural to CR4 for the following reasons: 1. The property is located on a Section line road (arterial) which has, and will continue to have, substantial traffic. 2. Subject area lies between Apache Trail and Superstition which is an area of mixed uses including nearby commercial uses on the trail. 3. As such apartments would provide an orderly transition. 4. CR-4 (Multiple Family) density is limited to one dwelling unit per 3500 square feet of lot area and cnnsrriiction of four plexes cannot be exceeder!. 9. Chairman closed the public hearing. 10. Oltman/Baker M/S Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Zommission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of re- zoning case PZ-5-80 requested by Mr. Virgil J. Buck from General Rural (GR) to Multiple Residence (CR-4) for the property he owns located at 252 N. Ironwood Drive described as Lot 11, Block 3, Newtown sub-division located in Apache Junction , Arizona. The motion passed unanimously by Roll call vote. 11. Exec. Secretary presented some follow-up material on the pre- liminary approval of the proposed Ironwood Sands sub-division. He stated that to, date, the only reference to Pinal County subdivtstnn•regillAtions appears to be Section 505, Sidewalks where "shall" is a mandatory word. However sidewalks have not been constructed in the County and if other information is developed it will be presented to the Commission. AIM I\ Ink -3- 12. Mr. Wendell Clark stated three (3) builders will be involved in this project and may not buy the lots if Agent they are required to put in sidewalks. If this happens, the developer will not develop property. He requested this be tabled for the present time. 13. Mrs. Taylor inquired about the price of the lots and also the price of the houses that will be constructed on these lots, and was advised the price range will be $50,000 on the house and lot, the individual lots having a value of about $8500 as close as they can now estimate. No single lots would be sold. 14. Mr. Gero stated the one (1) foot non-trespass ease- ments was previously required. The developer proposes to take the non-trespass easement off and to construct a "key" parking turn- around on each lot. This would allow the homeowner to turn around and drive onto Palo Verde. Que ,Lioned applicant as to whether this would be constructed in one phase? 15. Applicant responded that it would be constructed in �► several phases, each phase to be totally developed before the next one began. 16. Ms. Sharp questioned crosswalks. Mr. Gero stated there will be a time when they will become necessary. She questioned feelings about requiring sidewalks along Ironwood initially and doing the rest in stages, and about the speed limit within the subdivision. Mr. Gero responded that is governed by the standards of the streets. 17. Mr. Gero noted that the staff is working with Mr. Clarke and have him report back to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 4-14- 80 and at that time Planning and Zoning could act on this matter. 18. Mr. Clarke noted that regarding the church property on the North side and East side, the church is willing to deduct property for public right- oi-way as will the developer. The developer will pay the cost of developing 16th Avenue along the church frontage. The church will have to assume the cost along the Ironw000d frontage but indicates they can't at this time. Amok Ask -4- 19, Taylor/Strickler M/S to approve 1) the removal of the n,t- o t non-trespass easement and substituting Om] the key parking area concept; 2) require developer to report back at next meeting in CCR's. The motion passed unanimously by Roll call vote. 20. Mr. Gero spoke regarding APA membership. He recom- mended Chairman as well as an office membership, cost to be absorbed by the Planning budget Also, the same question on Arizona Planning Association with the budget absorbing this. 21. Taylor/Baker M/S that the Planning Department be authorized -to apply for office membership to the APA and individual membership of the Chairman of Planning and Zoning, further, Arizona Planning Association membership be authorized for the Chairman and Vice-Chairman. The motion passed unanimously by Roll call vote. 22. Sharp/0ltman M/S "Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that when the Planning and Zoning � . Commission has any duly advertised public hear- ing; and at the advertised time and place a quorum is not pres.fnt, the said public hearing may be postponed to the next regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission provided that a member of the Commission or a recog- nized member of the City staff shall announce at the advertised time and place for the public hearing the future time and place for the postponed public hearing". The motion passed unanimously by Roll call vote. 23. Commission discussed and filed the letter from Supervisor Karam dated February 27, 1980. 24. Commission discussed attending Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission hearing in Florence at 1:30 Wednesday, March 26, for the rezoning requested by Howell Anderson. Mr. Baljo indicated he will go. ^. Aft, -5- 25. Mr. Gero stated the staff request-, a commission initiative to repeal Section 2705 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding fees. These fees deal with building ""k, permits and belong in the building code. Once eliminated, the Building Department will approach the City Council to use the fees in the Uniform Building Code. 26. Commission agreed to authorize a public hearing to delete Section 2705 of the Zoning Ordinance. Recessed at 8:35, reconvened at 8:40 p.m. 27. Mr. Gero briefed Commission on the written request from property owners in Azure Skies subdivision. Without 100% representation on the petition, the City attorney said the only way to have a rezoning considered is by Cotission Initiative. Based upon the written request, is that action be taken by the Commission to allow consideration of rezoning this area from TH to CR 3. 28. Sharp/Baker M/S that P & Z authorize staff to advertise a pudic hearing for the purpose of hearing the +► request to rezone a portion of Azure Skies as per the letter from residents from the 'present class- ification of TH to CR 3 for that area as requested by the applicant. 29. Mr. Balj o gave a presentation on "strip" annexation. He recommended the City protect its future interest by strip annexing 1) a ten foot strip north along the Maricopa/Pinal County line from the city limits to Tonto National forest. 2) a ten foot strip south from the city limit, 4 miles past S 18, TIS, R8E, thence easterly past Kings Ranch; thence northerly to within one mile of the National forest. 30. Oltman/Baker M/S That the staff prepare a resolution to the council on strip annexation as expediently as possible. 31. Mr. Gero spoke regarding petition from Apache Junction Schools, Junior High and Senior High, Section 32 and on a letter from Mr. Dennis McCarthy, State Land Department. �.. 32. Strickler/Baker M/S to recommend to the City Council annexation of motion 32. Unanimous. Amk -6- 33. Strickler/Baker M/S to carry minutes of 3/18/80 over to the next meeting. Unanimous. Oftbk Meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted Joseph W. Gero, Executive Secretary Approved Amok George Baljo, Chairman PQACHE✓ elk( a--4T., i. ,-,, k I, t < gRI ZO �r�N P `6 4acie ty o� 09unction April 15, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO; THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGER FROM: RICH BROMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: MARCH - PROGRESS REPORT Attached are progress reports relating to street maintenance, miscellaneous items and the Building Department. ATTACH: DROVED ON.. 8d , 9.............. eINA � ITEM Na. Ft irL1C HEARING FOR AGENDA OF -tcl;.SS O.. __ �) _ NEW BUSINESS CITY iAANACER -- `/ INFO/REPORTS 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982 6154 Ammok STREET MAINTENANCE March 24 - 28, 1980 Graded 714 miles dirt roads MONDAY: 1. Graded W. 16th between Delaware and S. Cedar. 2. Graded Hilton between E. Roundup and E. Broadway. TUESDAY: 1. Graded S. Vaquero Road. 2. Ripped up and relaid material on part of Goldfield. 3. Changed blades on grader. WEDNESDY: 1. Graded Palm Drive between Superstition Drive and Hwy 60. 2. Worked on City Complex. THURSDAY: 1. Graded Dutchman Drive. 2. Gra'ed Vista Drive between Tepee and Hwy 88. 3. Graded Cortez between Tepee and Superstition Drive. 4. Worked on City Complex. FRIDAY: 1. Graded Goldfield between Hwy. 60 and 2nd Ave. 2. Graded Cortez Between 4th Ave. and Southern Ave. 3. Graded Southern Ave. south of Hwy. 60. Submitted: 17-"2;/;) D.P.W. : Manager: • Councilman: AN! In ik Ink STREET MAINTENANCE March 24 - 28, 1980 MONDAY: 1. Cut bushes and small trees on corner of Idaho and Junction Drive. 2. Had key made for yard gate. TUESDAY: 1. Cut and triwmed trees on Virginia and Thunderbird and hauled off trees that were cut before. WEDNESDAY: 1. Cutting trees on Virginia. Aftk 2. Worked on land site hauling fill. THURSDAY: 1. Rented loader to haus away fill on new land site. 2. Tran splay,tied cactus. FRIDAY: 1. Loaded and hauled in gravel for base to set fuel tank. 2. Spread granite for parking in new yard. Submit ted: i�`� / y�1 D.P.W. : Manager: Councilman: STREET MAINTENANCE March 17 - 21, 1980 MONDAY: 1. Put stone on Ironwood and Superstition and 88 then patch. 2. Went: after load of cold mix. 3. Patched stoned holes and all of Thunderbird. Between Trail and Superstition lots of lage holes. TUFSDAY: 1. Loaded and hauled 10 - 6 ton loads of granite from wash on Broadway. 1. 4 loads on Superstition and 88. 2. 3 loads on Broadway and Meridian. 3. 2 loades on 17th Ave. in Superstition Estates. 4. 1 load on corner of Broadway <,: d Idaho. 2. Cleaned 4 loads of brush and dirt on new land site. WEDNESDAY: 1. Fixed and reset 3 stop signs and 3 stop ahead signs. 00. 2. Hauled load off of old block and rubbish to dump for Fire Department. 3. Cleaned up rest of bushes and dirt on land site. THURSDAY: 1 . Went after load of cold mix. 2. Patched corner of Southern and Idaho. (Royal Palm Entrance) (corner Idaho and Broadway) Water main cut across 20th and Del Rio. 3. Fixed and reset street sign on Del Rio and 20th. 4. Put up stop sign on Greasewood and Desert View. 5. Changed stop sign on Idaho and Superstition. 44A/7:c r FRIDAY: 1. Patched cerri r of Del Rio asi-1. 2. Patched all Palm Springs area. 3. Go to Phoenix for Department of Public Safety. 4. Make contact on water truck and compressor. Submitted: D.P.W. : Manager: Councilman: STREET MAINTENANCE March 17 - 21, 1980 MONDAY: (21 miles) Graded Junction Drive, N. Delaware, W. Foothill and N. Grand. TUESDAY: (2 miles) Graded 4th Ave. Ripped up and relaid Royal Palm Drive between 4th Ave. and Hwy. 60. WEDNESDAY: 1 mil es)mi s) Graded N. Main, W. Smoketree and N. Saguaro. Ripped up and relaid Tomahawk between Hwy. 60 and Junction Drive. ellS THURSDAY: (114 miles) Graded Silver Drive between 4th Ave. and Broadway. Graded Tomahawk between Junction Drive and Super- stition Drive. Ripped up and relaid Wickiup between Super- stition Drive and Roundup Street. FRIDAY: Went to Phoenix and picked up a load of furniture for Public Works and Department of Public Safety. Submitted: . D.P.W. : QOF,„)Manager: Councilman: STREET MAINTENANCE March 11 - 15, 1980 MONDAY: 1. Rented front End Loader to clean pluged wash on Thunderbird next to Superstition Drive. 2. Loaded dump truck with granite to fill washed out section on corner of N. Superstition and Valley Road by church. 3. Loaded granite and dumped on end of S. Ocotillo. 4. Loaded 3 loads for big hole on S. 17th Avenue. 5. Loaded truck with brush and dirt on new land site. TUESDAY: 1. Fixed light over Judi and Ginny's desk. 2. Put dead bolt on fire exit in administrative building. 3. Checked bad washes to see if passable. 4. Contacted Toby Equipment. Loader Bid. WEDNESDAY: 1. Make contact on water truck. 2. Go after load of cold patch 3. Cold patch Idaho corners of Superstition, 16th, Broadway and cross over between 88th and Scenic. THURSDAY: 1. Make plywood back for city seal. 2. Went to look at water truck in Mesa. 3. Cold patched corner Delaware and Broadway and Superstition and Idaho and Ironwood and Broadway. FRII)AY: 1. Reset speed limit sign on Superstition. 2. Set post and put up Building permit on land site. 3. Cold patched East end of Superstition Drive. 4. Patched large hole on Ironwood and Superstition Drive and Rennic Drive. Submitted: ( �jr/ � Gc l /2 D.P.W. Manager: Councilman: .► _ STREET MAINTENANCE MARCH 10 - 14, 1980 MONDAY: 1. Rented loader. Cleaned out wash on Thunderbird. Hauled sand in holes in roads, and washouts on shoulders. 2. Cleared land for parking lots on city complex. TUESDAY: 1. Checked roads and washes. 2. Answered and studied a complaint in the field. 3. Worked on bids for loader. WEDNESDAY: 1. Graded W. Cactus Wren, and N. Valley Road. /aik 2. Dressed shoulders on Superstition. TEL 1. Dressed shoulders on Superstition. 2. Looked at and checked water truck in Mesa. 3. Worked on budget for street signs. FRIDAY: 1. Dressed shoulders on Superstition. 2. Graded W. 16th, S. San Marcos and two section on Southern. Submitted _____,XX;;,/,7. D.P.W. Manager Amok Councilman tok Am. 3//e/r61 STREET MAINTENAWE 1. Graded 6 miles of dirt roads: Am a. Shiprock b. roundup c. N. Main d. N. Grand e. W. GreaseLood f. W. Manzaaita g. N. Cedar h. W. Mockingbird i. N. San Marcos j . W. Windsong k. S. Wickiup 1. E. 20th Ave. m. Raindance n. Broadway 2. Graded shoulders and filled washouts on scenic and S. Tomahawk. 3. Ripped up sections of chuck holes and relaid material on: a. S. Wickiup b. N. San Marcos oak c. Shiprock d. Broadway 4. Checked out and contacted people on 3 complaints. Submitted: A g �/= —__-- D.P.W. : FL,: Manager: Councilman: AA\ WORK REPORT Week of March 3 - 7, 1980. Monday: 1. Got past street maintenance list from county and copied. 2. Make up list of priorities. 3. Make contact for loader and attachements. 4. Make contact for large stone for Rip Rap. Tuesday: 1. Cold patch Idaho. 2. Cold patch Delaware south of Broadway. Wednesday: 1. Go to Phoenix to pick up Gen. for P.D. 2. Get another load cold patch 3. Meet with Leon Wright from Tifco Industries Thursday: 1. Cold patch Delaware and Warner and Superstition Drive. 2. Make contack for two more bids on loader. Friday: 1 . Cold patch side streets no. side Superstition Drive. 2. Cold Patch So. Delaware and So. Ironwood. 3. Patched Drive way by fire barn 4.. 4. Post Zoning Signs gee -.4.144r..'''-- . - `Oily on c4pache Ounction April 1, 1980 TO: Director of Public Works FROM: Building Official/Zoning Administrator e 3 / RE: Building Permit Activity Attached you will find an activity report for the Building Permit activity for the month. of March, 1980. This report also keeps up a running Year-to-date total. LF; sw Attach: Activity Report 0 /'\ 150 NORTH°Como • POST OffiCE 30X K.APACHE JUNC1014,ARIZONA 55220 • 113.E 410AIE(602)952-6154 BUILDING PERY7T ACTIVITY MON''. OF YEAR TO CLASSIFICATION MARCH DATE Number of Building Permits Issued 61 189 ) Total of Permit Fees Assessed $1, 768. 00 $6, 151. 00 Total of Plan Reviews Assessed , 936. 00 3 ,036 .00 i Total Pre-inspection Fees Assessed 75 . 00 75.00 Total Incoming 2, 779 . 00 9,262.00 Estimated Cost of Proposed Construction $1,462 ,092.48 $3,243,973 . 13 ) Number of Inspections made in connection with permits 124 310 4 4/1/80 CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS ACTION NOT COMPLETED MEETING ACTION DATE REQUEST AGENCY STATUS 9/19/8i THAT RESOLUTION NO. 79-37, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR City Action contin- THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, Manager? gent upon City's ARIZONA RELATING TO THE APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF City acquisition of COMMERCE, BE ADOPTED TO SET ASIDE A ONE-HALF ACRE PAR- Clerk approx. 100 CEL OF LAND WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PARCEL FOR TH: acres of lands USE OF THE CHAMBER. from State Land Department. 3/5/80 THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-6, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR City Being AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SUP- Clerk implemented PORTING THE TIMELY EXTENSION OF THE SUPERSITION FREE- WAY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. 3/19/80 THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-9, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF City Being APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA REQUESTING THE Cler:. implemented FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF STUDY IN PREPARATION OF ITS FLOOD INSUR- ANCE RATE MAP AS IT RELATES TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED 4/2/80 MAYOR SEEMAN REQUESTED THAT THE STAFF LOOK INTO THE Director '$nfo provide CHARGES FOR COPIES OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS AND MA'._ A RE- Admin. to Mayor and COMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Services Council 4/30/80 4/2/80 MAYOR SEEMAN DIRECTED THE CITY ATTORNEY TO ANSWER IN City being WRITTING TO MR. ROBERT CONDRA AND JOE BARROCO THEIR Attorney prepared QUESTION ON WHY THE CITY DOES NOT ACCEPT CASH FOR BAIL CITY COUNCIL. MOTIONS MEETING OF APRIL 16, 1980 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED WITH THE DELECIION OF ITEM -0 • - NO. 8. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 2, -0- 1980, BE AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 44, BE READ BY TITLE -0- ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT ORDINANCE NO. 44, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND City Notification CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Clerk/ sent to Mr. AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING Planning Buck/Ordinance DISTRICT CLASSIFIC:'.HON IN REZONING CASE PZ-5-80 FROM Director published & GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO MULTIPLE RESIDENCE (CR-4) ; RE- posted. PEALING ANY CONFLICTING PRO"ISIONS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND IS HEREBY ADOPTED. (MOTION CARRIED) oak THAT THE APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF LICENSE, PERSON City Notification TO PERSON SERIES 10, OFF-SALE RETAILER'S LICEN`:E TO Clerk sent to State SELL ALL SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR, BY APPLICANT, JUAN J. Liquor Dept. HERRERA AND OFELIA JIMENEZ HERRERA, BE AND IS HEREBY and to Mr. RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR Herrera LICENSE AND CONTROL. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT A RESOLUTION NO. 80-13, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR Planning Will be AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZ- Director impler ;_ uted ONA, ENCOURAGING CITIZENS OF APACHE JUNCTION TO PART- 4/26 to 4/30 ICIPATE IN A COMMUNITY ATTITUDE SURVEY AND REQUIRING CONFIDENTIALITY IN THE SURVEY PROCESS, BE AND IS HERE- BY ADOPTED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND City Cler4 Posted in LEGAL ADVICE, BE HELD ON THE 7TH DAY OF MAY, 1980, AT the three 6.00 P.M. (MOTION CARRIED) locations THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE CITY STAFF TO City Letters sent to DRAFT A LETTER PLEDGING OUR SUPPORT AND OUR ASSISTANCE anager aricopa County (MANPOWER ASSISTANCE) NECESSARY TO CLEAN UP THE Board of Super- MASSAGE PARLORS ALONG APACHE TRAIL. THE LETTER TO BE visors and SENT TO JERRY HILL OF THE CITY OF MESA, AND COUNTY esa City Counci ATTORNEY CHUCK HAGGERD WITH MARICOPA COUNTY. (MOTION 4/21/80 CARRIED) THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:42 P.M. -0- CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING APRIL 16, 198a ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION COUNCILMAN EIDSON REQUESTED MAT HE WANTED IT KNOWN City Sent memo to THAT THE CITY COUNCIL WILL NOT STAND FOR CITIZENS Manager all mnloyees COMING INTO CITY HALL, USING VULGAR LANGUAGE ON CITY 4/22/80 EMPLOYEES AND THAT THE EMPLOYEES DO NOT HAVE PUT UP WITH IT. 'W12 ( nDrV(711 1-arCV " -11-1 " N Qs' r2 TrIncq'o \1--4-rn c°v.Y1 Low QQ ,C, Ft) Q8b' h ILriec-fAry) rrn ' L1- r tea r-v � 1 a .s Ey? -1, ralis -12,1/y?),z}v I? regog) ‘'.4RJ H r-ve- riQ'w3 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 71a Up0 54 5;..) ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: r° SECONDED BY: au Or YES NO ABSTAIN - COUNCILMAN _HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ COUNCILMAN BURGESS P COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO / MAYOR SE EMAN EEMAN ✓ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ;� ,, ..... ) ....., 9, _,., n b clr• "' SIGHT DEVELOP INTO p OT E�1T I AE EEG PL ER TO AVOID WHAT f IN ORB FOLLOWING: PROBLEMS,, I MOVE THE T THE CITY AND CITY COUNCIL TH A LEGAL LVEB BY THE MAYOR TORNEY ' S OFFICE BE IT RESO THE CITY OFFICE, CLARIFYING HE THROUGH GENERAL' S MANAGER REQUEST AT A ATTORNEY FIRE DISTRICT FUND FROM, THE ARIZC COUNTY TO PAY INTO R OPINION NS p F P. THEOBLIGATIOD AMOUNT DUE UNERPAS g-1005A, Aft\ Aft, .. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION THAT A LETTER BE DISPATCHED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REQUESTING THAT ONE MEMBER BE APPOINTED TO ATTEND ALL COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING MEETINGS AND ACT AS LIAISON BETWEEN THE TWO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS. Amik HONORABLE 'MAYOR: As per our discussion, here is a motion for you to use at Requests of Council should you want to. deWS/C) Auk ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Mo —,fier) ‘S`-- A I GT Mt� ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: p YES NCL ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓/ _ COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ COUNCILMAN BURCESS COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO ,f MAYOR SEEMAN ^� - I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOIE SHEET - NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF s('74° MOTION BY: tkJ SECONDED BY : fit) 0-- YES NO it cTArN COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO L/ COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS ` COUNCILMAN EIDSON ' VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO ' MAYOR SEEMAN `/7/ t UNANIM US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: /'\ 5 ITEM EM NO, i° BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P.M.