The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980 06.04 City Council Regular Agenda "IR,z00' `Oity o� 04pache 2unction COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING JUNE 4, 1980 7:00 P.M, 6:00 P. M. EXECUTIVE SESSION CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, MAY 14, 1980. (3) ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, MAY 21, 1980. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Governor on 4-Corners Grant. CALL TO THE PUBLIC (PETITIONS) CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (4) ORDINANCE NO. 34, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE, PARKING AND LOADING. (5) ORDINANCE NO. 32, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE, FILING FEES. (6) ORDINANCE NO. 33, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (TABLE ITEMS) NONE 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)9d2-6154 COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 6/4/80 PAGE 2 NEW BUSINESS (7) RESOLUTION NO. 80-16, ADOPTION OF TENTATIVE BUDGET. (8) AWARD OF BID, PROJECT NO. ND-80-1, PHOTO COPY MACHINE. (9) AWARD OF BID, PROJECT NO. PW-80-6, CITY HALL COMPLEX - PAVING IMPROVEMENTS. (10) APACHE VILLA IV, STREET ACCEPTANCE FOR MAINTENANCE. (11) RESOLUTION NO. 80-18, PROPOSED FUNDING THROUGH ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR STATE AID FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC AIRPORT. (12) RESOLUTION NO. 80-17, AIRPORT PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BUELL WINTER MOUSEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (13) EXECUTIVE SESSION, JUNE 18, 1980, AT 6:00 P.M. (14) INFORMATION AND REPORTS REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (15) ADJOURNMENT ROLL CALL r ROLL CALL PRESENT ABSENT MAYOR SEEMAN VICE-MAYOR GRAN ILLO COUNC I LMAN BURGESS ` // COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓� COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILMAN HILL v// COUNCILMAN SHANKS TOTAL (o .r. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # / MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: N rY YES 'in ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN SHANKS I COUNCILMAN Rl1RGF SS_ COUNCILMAN F1nSON ►� COUNCILMAN HII L COUNCILMAN DAM 1 ANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO V MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • • • • • I ITEh1 NO, 1 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BE APACHE T RESOD VED1 BY THE THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, CHE JUNCTION, AR�10"JA FOR APK�`��-,,{ �-------- -----__._ • • ITEM NO, 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE AGENDA BE AMENDED BY THE DELETION OF ITEMS NO, (MOTION FOR AiE ITEM EM FROM "NE AGENDA) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING MAY 14, 1980 Ad. A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction was held on May 14, 1980, at the Apache Junction City Hall , pursuant to the notice as required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Virginia Seeman called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. at the Apache Junction City Hall . ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Virginia Seeman, Jerry Burgess, Thomas Damiano, Jimmy Eidson, Norman Hill , and Marie Shanks. Councilmembers absent: Vice-Mayor Granillo. Staff present: G. Ray Lee, City Manager Rich Oesterle, City Clerk William McDaniel , Director of Public Safety SPECIAL BUSINESS AWARD OF BID, PROJECT NO. DPS-002-80 ) Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT PROJECT NO. DPS-002-80, TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM BID BE AND HEREBY IS AWARDED TO: TRI-CITY KAWASAKI FOR TWO SOLO ENFORCE- MENT POLICE MOTORCYCLES WITH ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,472.57; TONY M. COURY BUICK FOR ONE 4 DOOR SEDAN POLICE PACKAGE VECHICLE IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,292.25; THUNDERBIRD SALES CORP. FOR ONE SET TOP LIGHTS WITH WIRING HARNESS, MOUNTS, FLASHERS AND CONTROL BOX IN THE AMOUNT OF $667.17; MOTOROLA INC. FOR THREE 4 CHANNEL VHF MOBILE RADIOS WITH 3 CHANNELS CRYSTALLED, WITH 3 GAIN ANTENNAS, WITH RELATED WIRING HARNESS AND BRACKETS AND ONE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS CONSOLE WITH RELATED SUPPORT EQUIPMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,972.00; CMI FOR THREE MOVING RADAR UNITS, HAND HELD WITH ACCESSORIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,929.50; AND FOTO FORUM FOR ONE 35mm SLR ,_ CAMERA WITH ACCESSORIES IN THE AMOUNT OF $650.16, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING 5/14/80 Page 2 ADJOURNMENT Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 7: 10 P.M. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF 1980. Virginia Seeman Mayor ATTEST: Rich Oesterle City Clerk ROLL__CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # V MEETING OF MOTION BY: % SECONDED BY : /(? YE- NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN CAM I Ate_ / COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS ' COUNCILMAN EIDSON `/ COUNCILMAN HILL Vl VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN v UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • e • • • • • ITEM NO, 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 14, 1980, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING MAY 21, 1980 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction was held on May 21, 1980, at the Apache Junction City Hall , pursuant to the notice as required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Virginia Seeman called the meeting to order at 7:15 P.M. at the Apache Junction City Hall . INVOCATION Councilman ,S#arrks gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Damiano led in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Virginia Seeman, Jerry Burgess, Thomas Damiano, Jimmy Eidson, Norman Hill . Councilmembers absent: Vice-Mayor John Granillo, and Marie Shanks. Staff present: G. Ray Lee, City Manager Rich Oesterle, City Clerk Susan Goodwin, Assistant City Attorney Joe Gero, Director of Planning Marlis Davis, Director of Administrave Services Others present: George Baljo, 1070 E. Navajo, Apache Junction Roy Hudson, 2084 W. 9th Ave. , Apache Junction Arthur L. Strange, 1173 Escondido, Apache Junction Joe Morvak, 1224 S. Doran, Mesa Robert Dugger, 710 S. Lawson #17, Apache Junction Dan Andrews, 1975 N. La Barge, Apache Junction Tommie Bain, Division of Mobile Manufacturing and Housing Standards ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA ) ) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 5/21/80 Page 2 ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, APRIL 29, 1980 ) ) Councilman Damiano MOVED /" THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 29, 1980, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor: Councilman Burgess Councilman Hill Councilman Damiano Mayor Seeman Abstain: Councilman Eidson (not present at meeting) Motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, MAY 7, 1980 ) ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, 10. ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 7, 1980, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor: Councilman Damiano Councilman Hill Mayor Seeman Abstain: Councilman Burgess (not present at meeting) Councilman Eidson (not present at meeting) Motion carried. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS ) ) Mayor Seeman presented Lieutenent Seder with the Certificate of Recognition announced at the Regular Meeting of May 7, 1980. CALL TO THE PUBLIC (PETITIONS) ) ) City Clerk, Rich Oesterle, announced there were five requests from four individuals to speak as follows: Mr. Dan Andrews has two requests; (1) He asked if the Council has changed the price of the Xerox copies and (2) Mr. Andrews wished to address the City Council on off street parking. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING, 5/21/80 Page 3 Mayor Seeman explained that off-street parking is not on the Agenda and is scheduled for the next Council Meeting as a Public Hearing. City Clerk, Rich Oesterle, announced that Mr. Robert Dugger wished to address the Council on the Agenda Item No. 5; Mr. Joe Morvak wished to address the Council on Agenda Item No. 8; and Mr. Arthur Strange wished to address the Council on Agenda Item No. 10. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT ) City Manager Lee reported an up-date on the grant by the Governor's Highway Safety and has been advised that the City can proceed on the $62,000 grant. Secondly, the City Council/ Magistrate modular is on site and will be ready for public meetings by next Wednesday. Finally, the City now enjoys $31,000 in CETA grants which include 9 positions and the City has applied for $61,000 additional dollars for street crews. PUBLIC HEARINGS ORDINANCE NO. 48, REZONING CASE PZ-7-80 AZURE SKIES SUBDIVISION (SECOND READING) ) Mayor Seeman read the rules on the procedure of the Public Hearing. Upon opening the Public Hearing on PZ-7-80, Ordinance No. 48, (applicant Azure Skies Subdivision) , Mayor Seeman called on the Director of Planning to brief the City Council and the public on this petition. Planning Director, Joe Gero, explained that Rezoning Case PZ-7-80 is the application for rezoning lots 13-39, 52-73 and 86-112 inclusive, in the Azure Skies Subdivision. The requested rezoning is from Trailer Homesites (TH) to Single Family Residence (CR-3). The majority of the residences in the area did petition the commission for the commission initative. Mayor Seeman called on the applicant or spokesman for the petition. (No one spoke) Mayor Seeman called for any one in the audience that may wish to speak in favor of the petition. (No one spoke) Mayor Seeman called for anyone in the audience that may wish to speak in opposition of the petition. (No one spoke) Mayor Seeman called on the Planning Director for his recommendation. Planning Director, Joe Gero reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the City Council the unanimous approval of this particular request and the Planning Director concurs with the Commission's recommendation. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING, 5/21/80 Page 4 Mayor Seeman closed the Hearing to the Public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE READING ORDINANCE NO. 48, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 48. City Clerk, Rich Oesterle, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 48, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PARCELS LOCATED IN APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FROM TRAILER HOMESITES (TH) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (CR-3) , SAID PARCELS BEING THE SUBJECT OF REZONING CASE PZ-7-80; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 48, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PARCELS LOCATED IN APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FROM TRAILER HOMESITES (TH) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (CR-3) , SAID PARCELS BEING THE SUBJECT OF REZONING CASE PZ-7-80; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 41, AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 2705, (FEE SCHEDULE) (SECOND READING) ) ) Mayor Seeman opened the Public Hearing on PZ-6-80, Ordinance No. 41. Mayor Seeman called on the Planning Director to brief the City Council and public on this petition. Planning Director, Joe Gero, explained that in the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 2705, entitled FEES, setsforth various fees for the building permits; the Zoning Ordinance was adopted following the adoption of the Uniform Building Code, therefore, by placing Section 2705 in the Zoning Ordinance, the Council nullified the fee CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING, 5/21/80 Page 5 schedule in the Uniform Building Code. Mr. Gero futher explained why the fees should belong in the Uniform Building Code. Mr. Gero reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission by a 6 - 3 vote recommends to the City Council that proposed Ordinance No. 41, be approved. The second part of the Planning and Zoning recommendation refers to Agenda Item No. 8, Resolution No. 80-14. Mayor Seeman called for any one in the audience who wished to speak in favor of the petition. (No one spoke) Mayor Seeman called for any one in the audience who wished to speak in opposition of the petition. Mr. Robert Dugger, 710 S. Lawson, #17, Apache Junction, commented that by raising the fees on building permits, the City Council will hurt the growth of Apache Junction and stated that he is against raising fees. Mayor Seeman called on the Planning Director for his recommendation. Planning Director, Joe Gero, recommended that proposed Ordinance No. 41, be approved. Mayor Seeman closed the Hearing to the public. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 41, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Burgess seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 41. -City Clerk, Rich Oesterle, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING SECTION 2705 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING, 5/21/80 Page 6 Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 41, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING SECTION 2705 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS ORDINANCE NO. 47, AMENDING CITY CODE ON CITY COUNCIL MEETING LOCATION ) ) City Manager Lee explained that it is necessary to have an emergency clause on Ordinance No. 47, in order to have the next City Council meeting at the new location, and requested that the Mayor and Council consider a Special Meeting to consider this Ordinance. Mayor Seeman commented that the City Council should have a Special Meeting so the City may accommodate more people at the Council meetings. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT A SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 47, BE SET ON MAY 28TH, AT 5:30 P.M. , AT 150 N. OCOTILLO. Councilman Burgess seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. COMMUNITY SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAM ) ) Councilman Burgess provided a background explanation concerning the Connnunity Summer Recreation Program in coordination with the Apache Junction School District. Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY MANAGER'S ACTION TO PROVIDE THE CITY'S SHARE OF SUMMER RECREATION FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000 BE AND HEREBY IS RATIFIED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. -- - _ - - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 5/21/80 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 80-14, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE BUILDING PERMITS FEES ) Mayor Seeman explained that this Resolution would set the building permit fees by the Building Depart- ment in regards with that service. Mr. Joe Morvak, 1224 S. Doran, Mesa, commented that he agrees that building permits as related to single family residence need to be increased, but they need to be put in proper line with the scope of the work being done. Mr. Morvak requested that the City Council consider a reasonable modifier in the increase. Mayor Seeman explained the personnel and costs involved in the Building Department. City Manager Lee added that the City has one Building Inspector that also doubles as a Zoning Admin- istrator, and one secretary. The Building Official 's responsibility is that of the Director of Public Works. Mr. Joe Morvack asked if any way this evening before Resolution No. 80-14 is passed that the fee level would be set. oak Planning Director, Joe Gero, explained at great lengths the method of the fee schedule as set forth by the Uniform Building Cosde and the checks and balances that would be used in determining the cost of permit fees. Mr. Gero referred to a periodical called "Building Standard" published by the International Conference of Building Officials and further explained the modifiers for each particular state and average costs. Mr. Roy Hudson, 2084 W. 9th Avenue, Apache Junction, expressed that he felt that the City can not set the building fee by the cost of the department. He stated that one person should not set the fees, that the City Council should consider the recommend- ation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Seeman read the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission as presented in the City Council agenda packet with Ordinance No. 41. Mr. George Baljo, 1070 E. Navajo, Apache Junction, Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission "+ expressed the views of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the reason for their recommendation on the 50% modifier. Mayor Seeman and Members of the City Council discussed at great lengths at what percentage the modifier would begin and the best way to start the program. Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Resolution No. 80-14. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 5/21/80 Page 8 City Clerk, Rich Oesterle, read as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 80-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REAFFIRMING AND CLARIFY- ING THE BUILDING PERMIT FEES REQUIRED FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMITS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1979 EDITION. Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-14, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA REAFFIRMING AND CLARIFYING THE BUILDING PERMIT FEES REQUIRED FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMITS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1979 EDITION, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Mayor Seeman MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMEND TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO USE A 60 PERCENT MODIFIER ON THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. Councilman Burgess seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous !lotion carried. APPOINTMENT OF AIRPORT COMMISSION MEMBERS ) ) Mayor Seeman MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT JOHN DRUMMOND AND DR. DAVE ROBINSON APPOINTMENT FOR A THREE YEAR TERM; AND WILLIAM WRIGHT AND JOHN FORSBERG APPOINTMENT FOR A TWO YEAR TERM; AND RICHARD OLTMAN APPOINTMENT FOR A ONE YEAR TERM; AND DR. HOWARD DOWNS NON- VOTING MEMBER, APPOINTMENT FOR ONE YEAR TERM, TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSION, EFFECT- IVE MAY 21, 1980, BE AND HEREBY ARE APPROVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. Dan Andrews, 1975 N. La Barge, Apache Junction, asked on the cost of Xerox copies. Mayor Seeman answered that the cost will be ten cents (100 per copy if there is no objection from any of the Councilmembers. (There were no objections. ) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 5/21/80 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 80-15, MOBILE HOME AGREEMENT ) ) Arthur Strange, 1173 Esconodido, Apache Junction, encouraged the City Council to pass this Resolution in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Apache Junction. Mr. Tommie Bain, Division of Mobile Manufacturing and Housing Standards, stated he was present to answer any questions the City Council may have. Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read the title of Resolution No. 80-15. City Clerk, Rich Oesterle read as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 80-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ARIZONA, DIVISION OF MOBILE AND MANUFACTURED HOUSING STANDARDS. Councilman Burgess MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE- JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS IN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ARIZONA, DIVISION OF MOBILE AND MANUFACTURED HOUSING STANDARDS, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. EXECUTIVE MEETING, JUNE 4TH, 1980, AT 6:00 P.M. ) ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVICE BE HELD ON THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 1980, AT 6:00 P.M. , AT 1001 N. IDAHO. Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 5/21/80 Page 10 INFORMATION AND REPORTS ) Mayor Seeman reminded the City Council and audience that KSTM has offered 15 minutes on City Hall . REQUESTS OF COUNCIL ) ) Mr. Arthur Strange, 1173 Escondido, Apache Junction, complimented the City Council for their action on the Building Permit Fees, on using the 60 percent modifier. Councilman Damiano requested that the City Council review the Uniform Building Code fees in the near future or quarterly. ADJOURNMENT ) ) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8: 16 P.M. Councilman Burgess seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Motion carried. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DAY OF 1980. Virginia Seeman Mayor ATTEST: Rich Oesterle City Clerk ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # 2 MEETING OF MOTION BY: '''`' SECONDED BY : ) t -, N.O I A.n I N COUNCILMAN BURGESS ' COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓// COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILMAN HILL ✓ / COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO ✓ MAYOR SEEMAN ✓ / UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: J • • • ITEM NO, 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 21, 1980, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, Pop,CHF r_ iR/Z0N1)‘ COity &4pache 0?unction May 28, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGE ‹ FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ..r.W SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE 34; PARKING AND LOADING (PZ-2-80) Attached you will find Proposed Ordinance 34. This item has been adver- tised and scheduled for Public Hearing for the June 4, 1980 meeting. This is the proposed revision of the parking and loading requirements as found in the Zoning Ordinance. This document has resulted from many hours of effort by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Advisory Committee. The Planning Commission has held a Public Hearing on this matter, and following comments, recommends this proposal to the City Council for approval. The City Council has held a work session on this proposal. Comments were made at that time which suggested several minor modifications which would make the proposal more responsive to the Apache Junction circumstances. These suggestions have been incorporated. At this meeting, the City Council will have scheduled the first reading and the Public Hearing (advertised May 20, 1980) . The proposal contains the emergency clause. With regard to the emergency clause, all three proposed ordinances (32, 33 and 34) contain the requested emergency clause. The main reason for this is that there are a number of multiple- family rezoning cases which have been before the Planning and Zoning Commission for six months. These applicants desire to use the planned development process for requesting rezoning. There has been a sub- stantial loss of time by these applicants. In recognition of the time factor already lost, the future requirement for time in the rezoning process and the fact that these applicants have been held up due to the language of the current City Zoning Ordinance, it makes sense to utilize and justify the emergency clause as being fair and in the public interest. 171 OLD BUSINESS NEW BUS NESs • ry .................:3, 440-NORTWOCOTOS° CPO1;27OilaT OFFICE BO)CI04$ b CTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 Page 2 I recommend Proposed Ordinance #34 with the emergency clause. As a final note, some new suggestions have been made for other parking re- quirements which, when prepared, will be sent to the Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation. JWG/kmc ORDINANCE NO . 34 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING ARTICLE 21 "OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING : PUBLIC GARAGES AND FILLING STATIONS , " AND INSERTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW ARTICLE 21 "PARKING AND LOADING" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 21 . 01 THROUGH 21 . 07 INCLUSIVE SECTION 21 . 01 , INTENTION AND PURPOSE , SECTION 21 . 02 , GENERAL PROVISIONS , SECTION 21 . 03 , DETAILED STANDARDS , SECTION 21 . 04 , OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS , SECTION 21 . 05 , LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS , SECTION 21 . 06 , PARKING : ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS , SECTION 21 . 07 , HANDI- CAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS : REPEALING ANY CON- FLICTING PROVISIONS : PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY : AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY . BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : IN GENERAL The Apache Junction , Arizona Zoning Ordinance be amended by repealing Article 21 "OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING : PUBLIC GARAGES AND FILLING STATIONS , " and in- serting in lieu thereof a new article to read as follows : ARTICLE XXI Section 21 . 00 PARKING AND LOADING Section 21 . 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE Section 21 . 02 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 21 . 03 DETAILED STANDARDS Section 21 . 04 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS Section 21. 05 LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS Section 21 . 06 PARKING: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS Section 21 . 07 HANDICAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS Section 21 . 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE ... It is the intent and purpose of the parking and loading requirements to provide for adequate off-street parking spaces to serve residential , commercial , industrial , institutional , and other land uses , and thus help to prevent congestion of city streets . Proper design of and access to parking facilities shall be required in order to protect the public health , safety and welfare . Furthermore , it is the intent and purpose of these regulations to promote the functional efficiency of all land uses by requiring off-street parking and loading facilities consistent with modern standards . Ordinance #34 Page 2 Section 21.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The provisions and maintenance of required off-street parking and loading facilities are continuing obligations of the property owner or tenant. Required parking spaces shall be improved as required and made available for use before final inspection is completed by the Building Official. 2. In all zoning districts, when a building is enlarged or struct- urally altered, or a new building is constructed, or the use of an existing building is changed, off-street parking and loading spaces shall be provided prior to occupancy according to the requirements set forth in Section 21.04, Off-Street Parking Requirements, and Section 21.05, Loading Facilities Re- quirements. When several uses occupy a single structure or lot, the total required parking shall be the sum of the requirements of the individual uses and further, when a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice of parking requirements could be made, the use which requires the greatest number of parking spaces shall govern. When a use may have more than one work shift or occupancy, the shift or occupancy with the greatest number of occupants shall govern. When there is a change in the use of a building or parcel of land, the difference between the number of required parking spaces for the new use and the number required for the previous legal use according to this Article, even if spaces were not available for the pre- vious use, shall be provided. 3. In all zoning districts, required off-street parking shall be located on the premises intended to be served. 4. Required parking spaces shall be available for parking of vehicles of residents, customers, patrons, and employees, and shall not be used for storage of vehicles, or materials, or for the exclusive parking of vehicles used in conducting the business or use, and shall not be used for selling, repairing, or servicing. 5. In a residential zoning district no required parking spaces shall be provided in the front yard setback area; and provided further, except for single family dwellings and mobile homes, no parking shall be permitted in the front yard setback area. 6. A plan, drawn to scale, indicating how the off-street parking re- quirements are to be met, shall accompany an application for a building permit where parking is required. The plan shall show all elements necessary to indicate that the parking requirements as set forth in this Article are being fulfilled, and shall include at least the following: .. a. Delineation of individual parking spaces; and b. Circulation area necessary to serve spaces; and Ordinance ##34 Page 3 c. Access to streets and property to be served; and ^► d. Curb cuts; and e. Dimensions, continuity, and type of screening; and f. Grading, drainage, and surfacing details; and g. Delineation of obstacles to parking and circulation in finished parking area; and h. Specifications as to signs and bumper guards; and i. Landscaping. 7. When the unit of measurement determining the number of required parking spaces results in the requirement of a fractional space, any fraction up to and including one-half (0.5) shall be dis- regarded, and fractions over one half (0.5) shall require the additional one (1) parking space. 8. When parking areas are provided on a separate lot, the front setback requirements shall be determined as if applied to a one (1) story ,r► structure within the zoning district where it is located. Section 21.03 DETAILED STANDARDS All parking and loading areas shall be developed and maintained as follows: 1. Driveways and areas used for loading, parking, and maneuvering of vehicles shall have a surface which is durable, all weather, and paved of either asphalt or concrete; except that lots over 5/8 of an acre shall only be required to pave the accessway from the property line for a distance of up to forty (40) feet. 2. Except for single family and duplex dwellings, driveways and areas for loading, parking and maneuvering of vehicles shall meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works with regard to traffic flow onto public streets and alleys. 3. A parking area shall be designed to dispose of all surface water accumulation within the area in such a manner as to prevent drain- age onto adjoining property, and shall meet all other drainage requirements ... of the Director of Public Works. 4. A loading berth shall have minimum dimensions of fourteen (14) feet wide and fifty (50) feet long, and where covered shall have a vertical clearance of at least fourteen (14) feet. If the loading area in in the buildable area, this requirement shall not prevent the con- struction over the loading space clearance area. Ordinance #34 Page 4 5. Each required parking space shall be not less than nine (9) feet wide and not less than twenty (20) feet long, exclusive of access drives or aisles. 6. No obstructions of any kind shall be permitted within any designated parking space. 7. No parking space shall be located in a manner so as to block access to any other parking space, except on a parking lot with a parking attendant having access to each vehicle's keys. 8. Parking spaces shall be designed so that no backward movement of a vehicle onto a public right-of-way, other than an alley, will be necessary, except for single family and duplex dwellings. 9. When installed, bumper guards or wheel barriers shall be secured to the ground surface and shall be so installed that no portion of a vehicle will project onto a public right-of-way, over adjoining property, over a sidewalk, or into a required setback, land- scaping, or screening. 10. Lighting of a parking area shall not interfere with surround- ing areas or traffic flow. 11. Directional signs and pavement markings shall be used to con- trol vehicular movement in a parking area. Signs shall be limited to two (2) square feet each, and an aggregate total not to exceed twenty (20) square feet. No sign of any kind other than those indicating entrances, exits, name of establishment to which such parking area is accessory, or conditions of use shall be erected. No advertising on such signs shall be permitted. 12. No driveway over 300 feet long shall exceed a ten percent (10%) grade; and no driveway shall exceed seventeen percent (17%) grade. 13. A. common driveway shall be permitted for adjacent residential lots. At least one-half (Z) the minimum required width of the ser- vice driveway shall be located contiguously on each lot. Legal evidence shall be presented to the Director of Public Works and approved by the City Attorney, in the forms of deeds, leases, or contracts to establish Joint use, prior to zoning approval. Amok14. Where a parking area for a business or commercial use is a side yard or rear yard and adjoins a residential zoning district, a solid wall or fence of masonry or other approved fireproof material shall be constructed between the parking area and said district not less than four (4) feet nor more than six (6) feet in height, except that no fence shall be required within twenty (20) feet of Ordinance #34 Page 5 public right-of--way. 15. No parking lot shall have a vehicular entrance or exit onto a public right-of-way within thirty (30) feet of a residential zoning district or within fifty (50) feet of any school grounds, public playground, church, hospital, sanitorium, public library or institution for dependents or for children. 16. Off-street parking areas shall be arranged so as to conform with the standards depicted in Figure 21-1, "Off- Street Parking Standards". 17. No driveway in a front yard shall be more than twenty (20) feet wide and the front yard driveway shall not be used in calculating parking spaces. The Director of Public Works, or Arizona Department of Transportation on State or Federal highways , may limit the number and location of curb cuts along a public right-of-way. 18. (Reserved - landscaping and screening.) Section 21.04 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS The following sets forth the minimum number of parking spaces to be provided as regLred in this Ordinance. Re- quirements for a building or use not specifically listed shall be determined by the Director of Planning or Building Official based upon the requirements of similar uses. 1. Residential a. ONE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT - Two spaces for the dwelling unit. b. DUPLEX AND MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS - Type of Required Parking Dwelling Unit Spaces (1) Studio or efficiency unit * 1 space per dwelling unit. (2) Family lodging house* 0.75 space for each person for whom living accommodations are provided. Ordinance it 34 'Pge b (3) One-bedroom apartment* 11 spaces per dwelling unit (4) Two or more bedroom 2 spaces per dwelling unit . apartment* *Accessory rooms , such as dens , recreation rooms , extra living rooms , or family rooms , (but excluding kitchens , dining rooms , bathrooms , and one living room) shall be calculated as a bedroom when determining the required off-street parking spaces . c. GROUP HOME One (1) space per bedroom , plus one (1) space for each staff member . If counseling services are provided to non- residents , an additional one (1) space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area used by said counseling services shall be provided . Commission may authorize provision of fewer parking spaces if there is a clear indication that the number of require,' spaces for a group home is unnecessary due to such factors as resi:,ent- being unable to drive due to age or mental or physical disability . d. MOBILE HOME PARK One (1) parking space per mobile home space ; plus park- ing spaces for commercial or office uses as otherwise pro- vided in this Ordinance ; plus one ( 1) parking space per each five (5 ) mobile home spaces , said spaces to be located in a security area . e . TRAVEL TRAILER PARK One (1) parking space per OR TOURIST COURT travel trailer space ; plus parking spaces for commercial or office uses as otherwise provided in this Ordinance ; Ordinance ##34 Page 7 plus one parking space per each ten (10) travel trailer spaces, said spaces to be located in a security area. f. ROOMING HOUSE OR One (1) space per guest room, BOARDING HOUSE plus one (1) space for resident manager. g. MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION Two (2) spaces per lot. 2. Amusement park, fairground (reserved) or transient show. 3. Arena, stadium, auditorium, One (1) space for every four or theater. (4) seats; twenty (20) inches of bench or pew shall be con- sidered one (1) seat. ** 4. Assembly hall without seats. One (1) space for each one hundred (100) square feet of floor area used for assembly. 5. Bank. One (1) space for each two hun- dred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. 6. Bar, club, lodge, meeting room, One (1) space for each fifty (50) nightclub, and restaurant having square feet of gross floor area. sit down places. 7. Bowling alley. Three (3) spaces for each alley. 8. Bus terminal. One (1) space for each four hun- dred (400) square feet of gross floor area. 9. Church. One (1) space for every five (5) seats in the principal auditorium; twenty (20) inches of bench or pew shall be considered one (I) seat. ** .•. 10. Clinic. One (1) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area. Ordinance #34 Page 8 11. Club with overnight One (1) space for each two (2) accomodations. guest rooms or suites, plus requirement for a club. 12. Funeral Home Eight (8) spaces per reposing room, plus one (1) space per funeral vehicle, plus one (1) space per employee. 13. Home occupation. One (1) space, in addition to the required parking for the dwelling. 14. Hospital. One and eight-tenths (1.8) spaces per bed; however, hospital bas- sinets shall not be counted as beds. 15. Hotel. One (1) space for each two (2) guest rooms or suites, plus one (1) space for each two-hundred (200) square feet of gross •floor area devoted to other uses. 16. Industrial establishment. One (1) space for each one-thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area, or one (1) space for each four (4) employees on the largest shift, whichever is greater. 17. Motel. One (1) space for each guest room or suite , plus one (1) space for each two-hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area devoted to other uses. 18. Nursing home. One (1) space per two (2) beds. 19. Office. One (1) space for each two-hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area. 20. Pool hall. One (1) space for each one-hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. 21. Racquet/handball court. Two (2) spaces per court. Ordinance #34 Page 9 22. Restaurant-drive-in. (reserved) 23. Retail store, service One (1) space for each or repair shop. four hundred (400) square feet of gross floor area. 24. Retail store or service or One (1) space for each eight repair shop that handles hundred (800) square feet of bulky merchandise, such as gross floor area. furniture, large household appliances, or motor vehicles. 25. School - business, secretarial, Six (6) spaces for each industrial, technical, or trade, classroom. 26. School - college or university. Two (2) spaces per one- thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area used for academic purposes, plus one (1) space for each four (4) student rooming units, plus additional spaces as re- quired for non-academic uses. 27. School -preschool, nursery, Two (2) spaces for each class- kindergarten, elementary, or room and administrative office. junior high. 28. School - senior high. One (1) space for each ten (10) students for which the building was designed, plus one (1) space for each classroom and admin- istrative office. 29. Shopping Center. (reserved) 30. Skating rink. One (1) space for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. 31. Swimming pool. One (1) space for each one hundred (100) square feet of pool, sunbathing, and picnic area. AAft. 32. Tennis court. Three (3) spaces per court. 33. Wholesale establishment, One (1) space for each five warehouse, or air, rail, thousand (5,000) square feet of or trucking freight terminal, gross floor area, or one (1) space for each four (4) employees on the largest shift, whichever is greater. Ordinance # 34 Page 10 Ion ** Where permanent seating is not fixed , the seating capacity as determined by the Fire Chief , may be used to determine the number of seats . Section 21. 05 LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS In all zoning districts , in connection with every building hereafter erected to be occupied by uses requiring the receipt or shipment by motor vehicles of materials or merchandise , there shall be provided and maintained on the same premises with such building off-street loading and unloading space accessible from an alley or easement of access , or when there is no such alley or easement of access , from a street . One loading space shall be required for each 10 ,000 square feet of floor area . If less than 10 ,000 square feet exists , 5 ,000 or more square feet of floor area shall require one (1) loading space . Such space may occupy all or part of any required rear yard , except that no such space shall be located closer than fifty (50) feet to any lot in a residential zoning district unless wholly within a completely enclosed building or enclosed on all sides abutting said residential zoning district by a solid fence or wall not less than five (5) feet nor more than six (6) feet in height . Section 21 .06 PARKING : ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ____ 1. In any residential district , all motor vehicles which are unlicensed or incapable of movement under their own power shall be stored in a rear yard in a completely screened space , garage or carport , except in an emergency . 2 . One (1) travel trailer , which shall not be used for any purpose , may be stored or parked in a residential zoning district in the rear yard provided said trailer is stored in a garage or ramada , or in an area shielded from adjoining properties by an opague fence or planting . Section 21 .07 HANDICAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS ,.► (Reserved) SECTION II : REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES : All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , are hereby repealed . Ordinance II 34 Page 11 SECTION III : SEVERABILITY .•. If any section , sub-section , sentence , clause , phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof . SECTION IV : EMERGENCY CLAUSE Whereas , it is necessary for the preservation of the peace , health and safety of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , an emergency is declared to exist , and this ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , this day of , 19 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: SAL3fAIN City Attorney • $ S' �\��; ,.� 30' 9 r;•:.• It*, `11%,%1 .7 ..- ,1%:,3 o rti28.5 V‘` O liti .:1'"'d“.." itibih.1121S4b*t i: /41WM n ' 1.1 ' .1 •::_)%41t41111110/% tii 71 t'i ANNW 14%444 V•:44‘‘'i' ,1\. ,. .:, , ...0 14/4/604/4%.,:s.,,-, cx c GI.IA f�i3� '� r. z m 3 D C7 ND ; — - - - - - ; rnnA o-./s•� � r —ID"' � cl C Y o __,I.: Ff___ ... tli ''-s:kr 0 TII 141060s 2 'VI) - s'•1 -''s 46.44.46.. 411. SAINti:!. 0, :,, o kl ,', n PARA<.L et PAR e.Ncy zo !,t n S' 'a Le sr,L.�. ONLY - - IA PROPERTY 4I'Vd 3 k-23'.-1 �y Vi 2.4' 4011 R 9 ‘( ._\ A °Nl wAri' STREET- /3' M''s/. v Tw o wAY S racer- z w' illN i , 2° ki. PK oPtg rY L•mac -�' r ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: /� SECONDED BY : '(2 I YF �n ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN FIDSON / COUNCILMAN SHANKS v COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN BURGESS / COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO v MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: \)C, ROLL CALL VOIE SHEET NOTES ITEM # ,�' MEETING OF MOTION BY: 452 SECONDED BY:_ YFS NO , ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN H ILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO Vl COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: rirmill111111111111111" SPECIAL NOTE : IF THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED BY EMEGENCY CLAUSE ORDINANCE NO, 32 AND ORDINANCE NO , 33, MUST PASS WITH AN EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AS THEY ARE A PACKAGE, ITEM NO. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR step 1 AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 34, 3E READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED, (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if it does not have a unanimous vote , the City Clerk must read the Ordinance in full , ) step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 34 WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO, 34, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTIDIL ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING ARTICLE 21 "OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING; PUBLIC GARAGES AND FILLING STATIONS, " AND INSERTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW ARTICLE 21 "PARKING AND LOADING" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 21, 01 THROUGH 21 , 07 INCLUSIVE; SECTION 21. 01, INTENTION AND PURPOSE; SECTION 21. 02, GENERAL PROVISIONS; SECTION 21, 03, DETAILED STAN- DARDS; SECTION 21. 04, OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS; SECTION 21, 05, LOADING FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS; SECTION 21, 06, PARKING; ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 21, 07, HANDICAPPED PERSONS PARKING REQUIREMENTS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED . (MOTION WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) ROLL CALL VOIE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : LFS `I_S A I N COUNCILMAN S_HAN K.S COUNCILMAN IluRGFSS COUNCILMAN FTnSON COUNCILMAN Nil L COUNCILMAN fAMTANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN - UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: RQLL__CA L VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN �AbIANO , COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN FILL VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • • ITEM NO, 4 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 34 FOR THE FIRST READING , (ACTION WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) ___~� lap,cut n� U - kr" 2 "' 'IRIZONP CO2ty o C4pache cOunction May 28, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager_ FROM: Joe Gero, Director of Planning SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 32, Rezoning fees (PZ-1-80) Attached you will find Proposed Ordinance 32. The purpose of this proposal is to add to Zoning Ordinance Section 2804 planned de- velopment rezoning fees. The dollar amount, $100 does not change. The Planning and Zoning Commission unamimously recommends the City Council approve this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. This will be the first reading of the Ordinance. As you will note from the title, the Proposed Ordinance has the emergency clause. The same rationale for the emergency clause set forth for Proposed Ordinance No. 34 should be used here. A public hearing for this date was advertised on May 20, 1980 APPROVED ON .5-4-th ITEM No. ____ l /'// -..-- -/ PU Uc �-!EARNC7 FOR AO=NDA Or.ialT(.c�U OLD ci1S: .:SS MAY "uv5' ESS CITY �r AGER -'--.-._.........„ INFO/REPORTS 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 ORDINANCE NO, 32 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING SECTION 2804 "FILING FEE AND COST" AND INSERTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW SECTION 2804 "FILING FEES": REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY: AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: IN GENERAL The Apache Junction, Arizona Zoning Ordinance be amended by repealing Section 2804 "Filing Fees and Cost" and inserting in lieu thereof a new Section 2804 to read as follows: SECTION 2804 FILING FEES: Petitions filed by property owners shall be subject to and accompanied by a non-refundable filing and investigation fee. The purpose of the fee shall be to defray, in part, the expenses connected with each application. Schedule of Filing Fees A. Rezoning $100.00 B. Planned development application $100.00 SECTION II: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III: SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Ordinance No. 32 Page 2 SECTION IV; EMERGENCY CLAUSE Whereas , it is necessary for the preservation of the peace , health and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, an emergency is declared to exist , and this ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of to Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Ogal APPROVED AS TO FORM: . City Attorney EQLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # \-tR MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : J YFS 43STA1N_ COUNCILMAN BURGESS ` COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO ✓/ MAYOR SEEMAN I t/ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: \ Lf ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # Q MEETING OF MOTION BY: A9 SECONDED BY : YFS 40 ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN FIDSON. ✓ . COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAM IANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN _ v UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • ITEM NO, 5 SPECIAL NOTE : THIS ORDINANCE MUST PASS WITH AN EMERGENCY CLAUSE IF ORDINANCE NO , 34, PASSED WITH AN EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AS THIS ORDINANCE IS PART OF A PACKAGE , step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 32 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE : This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if it does not have a unanimous vote , the City Clerk must read the ordinance in full , ) step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 32 WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE , BE IT RESOLVED EY THE MAYOR step 3 AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 32, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY REPEALING SECTION 2804, "FILING FEE AND COST" AND INSERTING IN LIEU THEROF A NEW SECTION 2804 "FILING FEES"; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HERED' IS ADOPTED . (MOTION WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) • • ITEM NO, 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO, 32 FOR THE FIRST READING, (ACTION WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) PQACHF G Z gR'ZONp. `Oily C4pache 2unction May 28, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGE FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE 33, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PZ-3-80) Attached you will find Proposed Ordinance 33, which would add a new section to the Zoning Ordinance, allowing zoning by planned develop- ment. This proposal was developed by the staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Advisory Committee interaction. The Commission has held a Public Hearing on this agenda item and recommends approval by the City Council. This item will be on this agenda for first reading and Public Hearing (advertised May 20, 1980). This item contains the emergency clause for reasons as set forth on the transmittal sheet on item Proposed Ordinance 34. The Director of Planning also recommends this proposed ordinance to the City Council. During the next months, the staff will monitor closely the administration and application of the Ordinance. Should changes, including an entire rewrite be indicated as necessary, that could be accomplished with the rewriting of the Zoning Ordinance which will begin within a short time. ITEM No. APPROVED ON ; ARING rca JA OF lol S/4v O.. I1_15;,l`SS JWC/kmc NEW CG,,;.ESS __. .-• INFO/REPORTS CITY MAN GER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 ORDINANCE NO . 33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW ARTICLE ENTITLED " ARTICLE c3oj) XXXIII PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 33 . 01 THROUGH 33 . 11 INCLUSIVE: SECTION 33 . 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE, SECTION 33 . 02 PERMITTED USES , SECTION 33 . 03 PRO- CEDURE , SECTION 33 . 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED , SECTION 33 . 05 STAGING , SECTION 33 . 06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS , SECTION 33 . 07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES , SECTION 33 . 08 MIXED LAND USES, SECTION 33 . 09 GENERAL CRITERA, SECTION 33 . 10 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISIONS , SECTION 33 . 11 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS : REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS : PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY : AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY . BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : IN GENERAL The Apache Junction , Arizona Zoning Ordinance be amended by adding thereto a new article to read as follows : ARTICLE XXXIII Section 33 .00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT Section 33 .01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE Section 33. 02 PERMITTED USES Section 33 . 03 PROCEDURE Section 33 . 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED Section 33. 05 STAGING Section 33 . 06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 33 . 07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES Section 33 .08 MIXED LAND USES Section 33 .09 GENERAL CRITERIA Section 33 . 10 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISIONS Section 33 . 11 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS Section 33. 01 Intention and Purpose In certain instances the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance may be best achieved by the promotion of planned developments which do not conform in all respects to the land use pattern and regulations of conventional zoning . It is the intention and purpose of the Planned Development Zoning District (PD) to provide for greater flexibility , and thereby encourage more creative design which may include a combination of different dwelling types and/or a variety of land uses which complement Ordinance ##33 rage 2 each other and which are congruous with existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity . Therefore , it is intended to enable the use and integration of contempor- ary land planning principles in such a manner as to promote its most appropriate use ; to allow diversification in the relationship of various uses , structures and spaces ; to facilitate the adequate and economical pro- visions of streets and utilities ; to preserve the natural and scenic qualities of open space ; and establish guidelines that will encourage the highest standards of design and construction ; to offer recreational opportunities close to home ; to enhance the appearance of neighborhoods through preservation of natural green spaces ; to counteract the effects of urban congention and monotony while providing the environmental amenities ; and provide the unified control of development of land . It is further the intent to insure substantial compliance with the General (Comprehensive) Plan adopted by the City now or in the future and spirit of intent of the Zoning Ordinance in requiring adequate standards necessary to promote the public health , safety and general welfare without unduly inhibiting the advantages of modern planning as a means of effectuating desirable development , redevelopment , rehabilitation , and conservation in the City of Apache Junction for residential , commercial , industrial and other purposes . Section 33 . 02 Permitted Uses 1. The buildings and uses permitted in the Planned Development Zoning District shall be governed by the permitted uses in the base district or in a combination of base districts . The base district or districts from which permitted uses shall be determined shall include only those designated in the application and approved by the Council . 2 . Upon the approval of Council , the arrangement of uses on the land as permitted by the base district (s) , and the proportions of permitted land use defined by the underlying base district (s) may be adjusted , re-arranged or altered according to standards and regulations as provided in this Article . 3 . Any use applied for and not specifically listed in this Zoning Ordinance , if approved by the Council , shall be designated to the base district for which the use , when applied , would most resemble . Ordinance 1133 Page 3 4. By "base district" this Article means any conventional zoning district(s) as approved by the Council for a particular area. Normally, the base district(s) will be those existing or com- patible with existing conventional zoning districts in the subject area. Section 33.03 Procedure The development plan review shall be conducted according to the following steps, procedures and requirements notwithstanding any other provisions of this Zoning Ordinance. There shall be a three (3) step review process for planned development approval consisting of Step One: pre-preliminary; Step Two: preliminary; and Step Three: final approval. Each step is outlined below and each shall be approved before proceeding to the next step as provided. 1. General Procedure a. Application for a Planned Development Zoning District (PD) shall be filed in writing and on a form approved by the Commission in the manner required for amending the Zoning Ordinance. No application shall be accepted unless it is complete and is verified as to the correctness of information given by ... the signature of the applicant attesting thereto. The applicant, or his designated representative, is requested to be present at each public hearing on their application. b. The proposed planned development shall be in one (1) owner- ship or control, or the subject of a joint application by the owners of all the property included. c. At the time of filing of the preliminary plan, a fee shall be due in the amount prescribed for "Planned Development" on the most current City of Apache Junction Schedule of Filing Fees as found in Section 2804 of the Zoning Ordinance. d. The application shall be accompanied by plans, filing doc- uments and information as prescribed in this Article, or as prescribed by the Commission. e. An application for a planned development must be filed not less than eighteen (18) days prior to the public hearing. Ordinance #33 Page 4 2 . Step One : Pre-Preliminary Application a. The approval of Step One shall be construed as only concept approval for the given site and shall not be construed as approval of any zoning amendment . b. The Planning Department staff shall determine whether the planned development requirements of this Article are complied with . If the developer disagrees with the determination , the applicant by request , cr the staff , may take the pre-prelim- inary information to the Planning Commission for its determination of whether this site is suitable for development as a planned development . This step does not require an advertised public hearing . 3. Step Two: Preliminary Application (General Development Plan) a. The approval of Step Two shall be preliminary approval of the specific project on the desig- nated site and shall create the zoning map change . .•. b . Investigation and Reports-Planning The Director of Planning shall cause to be made by himself or members of the staff , and in co- operation with other appropriate city departments and consultants an investigation of facts and review of all applications and documents presented hereunder as will serve to provide all necessary information to assure that the action of each applicant is consistent with the intentions and purpose of this Article . At the appropriate stage (s ) the Director of Planning , or designated representative , shall submit a prepared report to the Commission for consideration and may recommend that the application be approved as submitted , approved with conditions , denied , or returned to the applicant for revision . c. Review by Planning and Zoning Commission Thereafter , the Commission shall review the application for Planned Development and shall hold a public hearing (s) as required . After such hearing , the Commission shall determine whether the proposal conforms to the criteria and Planned Development Ordinance #33 Page 5 Requirements as set forth in this Article , and shall either recommend to the Council that the preliminary application and development plan be : 1) Approved ; or 2) Approved requiring changes therein ; or 3) Shall return the plan and application for revision ; or (4) Denied . d . Council Consideration Upon the recommendation from the Commission , the Council shall advertise and hold a public hearing upon the re- quest . After the conclusion of such hearing (s) , the Council shall either : 1) Approve the application as recommended by the Commission ; or 2) Approve the conditions requiring changes or impose such conditions of approval as are in its judgment necessary to insure conformity to the criteria and the Planned Development Regulations as set forth in this Article ; or 3) Shall return the plan and/or application for revision to the applicant ; .�. or 4) Shall deny the application as submitted ; or 5) May refer the application to the Commission for their reconsideration and a subsequent report to the Council . 4 . Step Three : Final Application (Precise Development Plan) a. Approval of Step Three shall be given only when it can be shown that the proposed project , or any stage of the total development plan , meets all requirements as set forth for final approval in this Article plus all requirements , stipulations , and modifications of the preliminary plan as required by the Council have been met . b . Within one (1) year after the approval of a preliminary development plan , the applicant shall file with the De- partment of Planning a final plan for the entire develop- ment , or when submission in stages has been authorized , for the first stage of the development . The Commission , after the first year and at its discretion , may extend the date for submission of the final plan for one (1) additional year providing that the circumstances warrant such an extension . c. The Commission shall not approve the final development plan for any stage of the Planned Development if either the total number of stages developed and /or the average of the allowable dwelling units per stage , up to and in- cluding the stage which is to be approved , exceeds by more than twenty-five (25) percent the average number of dwelling units per stage which is allowable for the entire planned development . a.. Ordinance #33 'c3$e 6 d . The Commission shall consider for approval all final plans . Provided all the requirements of this OIN Article are met the Commission shall grant such approval ; except that where action of the City Council is required said approval shall be subject to City Council approval of specific items . 5 . General a. For any area of which the City has a valid application for annexation and which also has a valid application filed for a planned develop- ment , the applicant shall have the base district considered as an integral part of the Planned Development application . b . Should the zoning of the base district be inappropriate for a proposed PD , changing of the base district shall be accomplished as an integral part of approval of the Planned Development application . Under the PD application , the base district zone change shall not be approved /e".• without approving the Planned Development Application . Section 33 . 04 Documentation Content Required The following information and documents shall be submitted with the application to the Department of Planning : 1 . Step One : Pre-Preliminary Stage Consideration a. A letter of intent for a Planned Development shall be submitted by the owner or authorized agent . Before submitting an application for a Planned Development , the applicant is urged to confer with the Department of Planning to obtain an application and discuss procedures , fees , schedules and assistance . An accurate map drawn to sufficient scale to adequately show the boundaries and dimensions of the site , a north arrow , the scale , names j and dimensions of all streets , alleys and ease- ments bounding or touching the site . The map shall also include schematic reference showing the plot plan of the land in the area to be developed indicating : 1 . The general relationship contemplated among all public and private uses ; and Ordinance #33 Page 7 2 . The location , dimensions and direction of any major physiographic features such as railroads , drainageways and existing man-made physical features ; and 3 . All private rights-of-way proposed ; and 4 . Location of all proposed structures ; and 5. Location of all proposed common open space ; and 6 . Location of any flood hazard areas as determined by the Federal Emergency Pre- paredness Agency . b . An explanatory statement containing the following information : 1. A showing of property ownership including all easements ; and 2 . The source of water supply , method of sewerage disposal and means of drainage ; and 3 . Approximate number and types of units proposed for the site ; and 4. Any proposed non-residential uses (i . e . commercial , industrial , etc . ) ; and 5 . Public and private egress ; and �`► 6 . Areas to be devoted to various uses and population densities contemplated for the project , and 7 . The area total for the project site . 2 . Step Two : Preliminary Stage Consideration a . One (1) transparency and four (4) prints of a development plan of the entire development showing : 1 . General location for vehicle and pedestrian circulation indicating streets , driveways , sidewalks (if any) , pedestrian ways , off- street parking , loading areas and provision for fire and other emergency vehicles . 2 . Location and approximate dimensions of structures together with the usage to be contained therein and approximate location of all entrances thereto showing character and relationships of buildings , streets , and open area . 3 . A description of adjoining areas , uses or structures which may affect , or be affected by , the design or location of buildings of the development or the uses or traffic circulation therein. Said description shall include maps and information for at least four hundred feet (400 ' ) beyond the development . Ordinance #33 Page 8 4 . A description of the general scheme of land- ► scaping to be employed including the extent , location arrangement and proposed improvements of all open areas , landscaping ,fences , and walls . Said description shall include per- spective schematic renderings . Proposed provisions for maintenance of all open areas shall be included . 5 . The Director of Public Works may require the submission of contour information for a portion of , or the total development site , when such information is deemed necessary to adequately evaluate the Planned Development . When re- quired , the information shall conform at least to the following minimum standards . i . Contour information given shall be tied to USGS or GLO datum. At least one (1) bench mark , at or close to the property shall be required . Contour elevations shall conform to ground slope intervals as required by Subdivision ^` Ordinance and/or : ii . Contour elevations at the centerline of all private and public streets , roadways , driveways and parking areas within the project area . 6 . Cross-sections through the property showing grades and building height relationships shall be included . 7 . General provisions to be made for utilities and storm drains . 8. General provisions for handling storm water runoff shall be indicated . b . Four(4) copies of the following information and documents : 1. A tabulation of the land area to be devoted to various uses including an indication of land to be dedicated for street , park , school , or any .••. other purpose . 2 . A development schedule indicating (1) the approximate date when construction of the project can be expected to begin; (2) the stages in which the project will be built and the approximate date when construction of each stage can be expected to begin . Ordinance #33 Page 9 3 . Architectural drawings , sketches , perspective schematic renderings , or scale models necessary to demonstrate the design and character of the proposed development . 4 . A draft of the major points for covenants proposed affecting the property . 5 . A lighting plan including proposed street and security lighting , an analysis of the effect of such proposed lighting on adjacent property , and such other information as may reasonably be necessary . 6 . A signing plan including the location , type , size , height and area of proposed signs . 7 . An indication of whether or not land is to be subdivided . 8. A certified legal description or boundary survey by a registered engineer or registered surveyor of the property , or properties , to be included in the total development including all easements ; and 9 . Other relevant operational data and such reasonable information as the Commission and/or Council may require including an updating of all information submitted for pre-preliminary approval . 3 . Step Three : Final Stage Consideration The information submitted shall be sufficiently detailed to indicate fully the ultimate operation and appearance of the development and shall include all information submitted in the preliminary plan plus the following : a. The location of water , sewerage and drainage facilities . b . Landscaping and planting plan showing location , number and name of all trees and major shrubs ; trees over 6" in trunk diameter to be removed by development shall be so marked . c. The character and location of signs in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance . d . Plans for street improvements and finished grades or earth moving plans . Specific request for modification of traffic barriers and provisions for the relocation of utilities should be made . "owe . Location and dimensions of pedestrian walkways , malls , trails or any easements . f . Comprehensive soils and geological reports substantiat- ing the soundness of the development shall be submitted by a soil analyst if required by the Building Official . g . Location and dimensions of parking areas and other car maneuvering areas including location of driveways and other access points . h . Copies of legal documents required by the Council for dedication or reservation of public facilities . i . Requirements for subdivision , if applicable , as set forth in the Subdivision Ordinance . Ordinance #33 Page 10 j . If development is in stages , the approximate .•: date when the stage is to be complete . Section 33 . 05 Staging When development by stages is requested , the Planning Commission shall review the preliminary application , re- quired documents , proposed development schedule and any other information or documents necessary to determine that the proposed total development meets the intent and purpose for "Planned Development" as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance , and to further determine if in the judgment of the Council the proposed development is of the scale and design to warrant approval of staging . When submission in stages has been authorized by the Council , the following shall apply : 1 . The time schedule , as described in 33 . 04 . 02 (b) (2) , indicating the approximate date on which construction of the project will begin and the anticipated rate of development shall become a part of the planned development preliminary approval and shall be adhered to by the applicant and any successors in interest . 2 . When more than one (1) area of a proposed planned development area is proposed for subdivisions , sub- mission of subdivision proposals for a specific area shall not be made until such time as the developer intends to proceed with each such area of development . Section 33 . 06 Development Standards In addition to , or as a greater requirement to the regulations normally found in the district , the following regulations shall apply to all development within a Planned Development Zoning District . 1. Density - The developer shall propose a density subject to Council approval . Upon the adoption of a City General (Comprehensive) Plan the allowable density shall not exceed that as set forth in said Plan . Further , the density shall not exceed that as permitted in the base zone ; provided , that the density restrictions of this section may be amended as set forth below: Ordinance #33 Page 11 "` a. Incentive Density Increases - Design , character , identity , and architectural siting variations incorporated into a develop- ment shall be considered cause for population density and building intensity increases not to exceed fifteen (15) percent of that allowable in the zone underlying the application , pro- vided they make a substantial contribution to the objectives of a Planned Developement . The degree of distinctiveness and desirable variation achieved shall govern the amount of density/ intensity increase which the Council may approve . The Council shall consider three major design features of each project when considering incentive density increases . The Council may grant up to five (5) percent increase in density for each of the three (3) major design areas which follow. Some specific design features are included under each of the three major headings to aid in the consideration of each project ' s merit . 1 . Landscaping (Maximum increase of five percent (5%) : 1 . Street landscaping for this area ; 2 . Open space and plazas ; 3. Use of natural landscape ; 4. Pedestrian way treatment ; 5 . Recreational areas . 2 . Siting (Maximum increase of five percent (5%) : 1 . Visual features ; 2 . Use of natural features (water , etc . ) ; 3 . View; . 4. Sun and wind orientation ; 5 . Circulation pattern ; 6 . Physical environment ; 7 . Variation in building setbacks ; 8. Building groups (cluster , etc . ) . 3. Design features (Maximum increase of five percent (5%) : • 1 . Street sections ; 2 . Architectural style ; 3 . Harmonious use of materials ; 4 . Parking area broken by landscape ; 5 . Varied use of house types . - s Ordinance #33 Page 12 b . Density Limitations -- If the Council finds that any of the following conditions would be created by a proposed Planned Development , it may either (1) prohibit any in- crease in density , or (2) decrease the basic density allowance by up to fifteen percent ( 15%) in order to avoid the creation of any of these conditions : 1 . Inconvenient or unsafe access to the Planned Development ; 2 . Traffic congestion which could be projected on the surrounding streets as a result of the existing conditions and approval of the planned development application , and which could thereby create a potential hazard to the health , and general welfare of the residents which adjoin the planned development site . 3 . Excessive burden on parks , recreational areas , schools , and other public facilities which serve the Planned Development . c. Planned Development in more than one ( 1) district -- If the Planned Development is in more than one (1) zoning district , the number of allowable dwelling units must be separately calculated for each portion of the Planned Development that is in a separate zone , and must then be combined to determine the number of dwelling units allowable in the entire Planned Development . However , the distribution of dwelling units and lot sizes within the Planned Development need not be affected by existing zoning district boundaries . Individual buildings , accessory buildings , off-street parking and loading facilities , open area , and landscaping and screeening may be located without reference to lot lines , save the boundary lines of the development . When calculating density of a proposed Planned Development , the total area , including street dedication , shall be included . d . A proposed Planned Development may have specified reasonable minimum lot sizes or other minimum re- quirements for a part of , or all , of the planned development area . Ordinance #33 Page 13 2 . Setbacks and Spacing between buildings --- .. a. Perimeter setbacks - Generally these setbacks will be those of the base district unless otherwise approved by the City Council . b . Interior setbacks - As approved by the City Council ; provided no setbacks shall violate requirements of the Uniform Building Code or Uniform Fire Code . c. Buildings should be located in such a manner so as to avoid , when possible , a corridor or barracks-like effect . d . Increased setbacks - Setbacks greater than those of the immediately adjacent property may be required where the intensity of development is greater than that of the adjacent property to such an extent that greater peripheral setbacks are needed in order to insure the health , safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the development of said A.+ adjacent property . e . In reviewing setback requirements the following criteria shall help govern the degree an appli- cant shall be permitted to deviate from the base zoning district requirements . 1. A better or more appropriate design can be achieved by not applying the provision of the zoning district ; and 2 . Adherence to the requirements of the zoning district is not required in order to insure health , safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the development ; and 3 . Adherence to the requirements of the zoning district is not required in order to insure that property values of adjacent properties will not be reduced . 3. Height sm. a. Generally , no building shall exceed a height which is twenty-five (25) percent greater than that of the maximum building height limitation of the base district in which the planned development is proposed . b . The Council may approve different extra limita- tions not less than that provided in Subsection a , provided that the proposed height is not detrimental , incompatible or otherwise unde- sirable with respect to existing or proposed Ordinance # 33 Page 14 future surrounding area development , and provided that one of the following situations can be found to exist : 1 . That the height increase can be justified on the basis of unique lot characteristics , topographical conditions , or other natural features ; or 2 . That the height increase can be justified on the basis of amenities provided or con- cessions made by the developer for which some bonus incentive is warranted . c. When the Planned Development abuts or is in a single family base district , the building height for the base district shall apply within 200 feet of the said single family base district . 4 . Usable Open Area a. There shall be a minimum of ten percent (10%) ..••. of the total area of the Planned Development dedicated or reserved as common usable open area. Such area shall be clearly designated on the plan as to character of use and develop- ment , but shall not include : 1 . Private or public dedicated streets , alleys and other rights-of-way . 2 . Vehicular drives , parking , loading and storage areas . b . The required minimum lot area for any single family dwelling unit within a planned develop- ment project may be reduced by one (1) square foot for each one (1) square foot of common usable open area substituted in the project site elsewhere , and provided that the minimum lot area is not reduced by more than twenty percent (20%) . The substitute common open area may not be counted toward the minimum required open area for the planned development site . c. With a planned development , a planned residential area may have distributed without regard to the underlying zone , the required open area . d . When , with a PD , a planned residential area is constructed by stages , the plans for usable open area shall include provisions for such areas within each staged area . Ordinance #33 Page 15 e . Required usable open area shall be complete as to .•. approved specifications prior to occupancy of the planned development , or an approved stage thereof . 5 . Off-Street Parking Facilities-- The following shall be applied in all Planned Developments : a . Parking requirements shall be equal to at least the sum of the parking requirements for all uses proposed and which is equal to that required by Article 21 herein , except that those requirements may be increased or decreased where the Council determines that because of the location of the property with respect to surrounding areas within reasonable walking distance , and or public trans- portation , or any other consideration reasonably relating to the need for parking in the development , such increase or decrease is appropriate . However , in a commercial or industrial planned development where it can be demonstrated by the applicant that due to nonconflicting hours of operation , design ''—• of the circulation and parking plan or any other factor reasonably related to the need for parking the total parking requirement can be reduced , the Council may do so provided legal notice of the application specifies that such reduction has been requested . b . Development standards shall be as provided in Article 33 of the Zoning Ordinance except that the following shall also be guidelines : 1. Private streets may serve circulation and parking purposes if providing adequately for fire and police protection , rubbish collection and lighting , as established by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Public Safety . 2 . A building group may not be so arranged that any temporarily or permanently inhabited building is inaccessible by emergency vehicles . 3 . Driveways and circulation roadways shall be designed to minimize traffic and congestion within the Planned Development and to minimize the amount of paving . 4 . Circulation and parking areas shall be separated from recreational areas to facilitate safe vehicular movement . In the design of the circu- lation and parking plan , priority shall be given to pedestrian access and activity . Ordinance #33 Page 16 c . Any required parking spaces serving residential uses shall be located within two hundred (200) .•. feet of the building containing the living units served . Section 33 .07 Dedication and maintenance of facilities --- The Commission may recommend and the City Council may require as a condition of approval for any planned development , that portions of the tract or tracts under consideration be set aside , improved , conveyed or dedicated for the following uses : 1. Streets : That the right-of-way width designated be dedicated to the City . Such other streets necessary to the proper development of adjacent properties may also be required . 2 . Easements : That owner shall grant to the City such easements as will be required to insure the necessary and orderly extension of public utilities , including easements over all non-dedicated private streets over .••. which the City may need ingress or egress for the purpose of protecting and preserving the health , safety , and welfare of the public and for the provision of municipal services of which each citizen within the City has a right to expect and may require at any future time . 3. Underground Utilities : In any development which is primarily designed for or occupied by dwellings , all electric and telephone facilities , fire alarm conduits , street lighting wiring , and other wiring , conduits and similar facilities shall be placed underground by the developer , unless waived by the Council . 4 . Recreation Facilities : The Council may require that suitable area for parks or playgrounds be set aside , improved or permanently reserved for the owners , residents , employees or patrons of the development . Section 33 . 08 Mixed Land Use 1 . Residential use mixed with other uses -- a. In a residential planned development of over four (4) acres , or where development is by stages , and where commercial and /or industrial uses are being developed in conjunction with residential uses , construction of commercial Ordinance #133 Page 17 and/or industrial uses shall not be initiated until a percentage of residential units to be specified in the planned development approval have been developed . The Council may specify stages of approval for industrial or commercial use to coincide with a minimum percentage of residential uses completed . b . A basic premise shall be that such retail and service commercial development and/or industrial development be ancillary to , basically serve , and integrate in a compatible fashion with the primary residential use and character of the planned development district and surrounding properties . Section 33 . 09 General Criteria In addition , a planned development may be granted only if it is found that the development conforms to all of the following general criteria : 1 . That the location , design , size , and uses are consistent with the General (Comprehensive) Plan , adopted by the City now or in the future , and with any other applicable plan , development map , or ordinance adopted by the City Council . If the development plan is found to be in the public interest , but is in conflict with the General (Comprehensive) Plan , amendment of the General (Comprehensive) Plan shall be approved before approval may be granted for the Planned Development application . 2 . That the location , design , and size are such that the development can be well integrated with its surround- ings ; is planned and developed with the intention to harmonize with any existing or proposed development in the adjacent neighborhood ; and in the case of a departure in character from surrounding uses , that the location and design will adequately reduce the impact of the development so the project will not be detrimental to the adjacent property . 3. That the location , design , size and uses are such that traffic generated by the development , except in single family density , can be accommodated safely without congestion on existing or planned arterial or collector streets and shall , in the case of Ordinance #33 Page 18 A. commercial or industrial developments , be designed to attract and accomodate traffic on local arterial or collector streets . 4 . That the location , design , size and uses are such that the residents or establishments to be accommodated will be adequately served by existing or planned public facilities and services . 5 . That the location , design , size and uses should result in an attractive , healthful , efficient and stable environment for living , shopping , working and leisure activities . 6 . That the development plan makes appropriate provision for th preservation of the environment , both natural and man-made . Section 33. 10 Planned Development Subdivisions 1 . Conversions of pre-existing subdivisions to ,..� Planned Developments a . The Council may approve a Planned Development for an area previously subdivided , in which case said subdivision , and any structure con- structed thereon , shall be considered in con- formance with zoning requirements as to lot size , setbacks , and height . Such an area may include a group of structures either sub- stantially constructed cr in existence at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance , which structures when constructed were intended to be similar in purpose and are substantially similar in design and purpose on the effective date of this Ordinance . b . Applicants for conversions of pre-existing subdivisions to Planned Development District zoning shall follow the application and pro- cedures for plan review as set forth in this Article , except that during the pre-preliminary conference the Director of Planning shall advise the applicant as to appropriate modifications which might be made in application requirements . c. In a pre-existing subdivision , the signatures of 51% of the property owned by both number and area shall be required to initiate a planned development application for such area. Ordinance #f33 Page 19 Section 33 . 11 Supplementary Provisions 1. Limitation on resubmission Whenever an application for a planned development has been denied , a similar application for the same area or any portion thereof shall not be filed within six (6) months after the date of denial . 2 . Adherence to approved plan and modification thereof The applicant shall be bound by the plans and narrative for himself and his successors in interest , and by the conditions prescribed for approval of the development . The approved final plan and stage development schedule shall control the issuance of all building permits and shall restrict the nature , location and design of all uses . Minor changes in an approved preliminary or final development plan may be approved by the Building Official if such changes are consistent with the purposes and general character of the development plan . All other modifications and amendments , and all major changes , including extension or revision of the stage development schedule shall have a public hearing for consideration and action by the Council . 3 . Revocation for failure to adhere to approved plan , satisfy conditions of approval , or comply with stage development schedule In the event of a failure to comply with the approved preliminary or final development plan or any prescribed condition of approval , including failure to comply with the stage development schedule , shall constitute a violation of this Article as prescribed in Article 27 . The Commission may , after notice hold a public hearing and recommend the revocation of a planned development zoning district . Thereafter the Council shall consider the recommendation in the same .••. manner as in considering a rezoning request . 4. Expiration and reversion of Planned Development Zoning District If within one (1) year after the approval of the preliminary plan and designation on the Apache Junction Zoning Map by the Council , construction specified in the final development plan has not been 4 Ordinance #33 Page 20 commenced , or cannot be developed as approved , then the PD District classification shall be recalled to the Commission for review. If it has not been shown that it is in the public interest , and if the applicant has not demonstrated good cause necessitating the extension of time , the Commission shall recommend the PD designation revert to the base zone designation existing at the time of approval of the Planned Development Zoning District , or other appropriate designation . If however , the applicant shows good cause necessitating an extension which would serve the public interest , then the Commission may grant two (2) extensions of time to commence substantial construction . Each extension of time shall not exceed a one ( 1) year period . 5 . Transfers and assignments - If during any stage of the development the property under application , or any portion thereof , is trans- ferred or assigned to another , then the transferee or assignee shall be bound to the requirement and design of the approved project ; except that a transferee or assignee may make application for a major change of the application in which case the Council shall hear the application as if it were a major change in the Planned Development . 6 . Cancellation by applicant Cancellation may be initiated by the applicant of the property covered by the application by means of a written Notice of Cancellation directed to the Department of Planning . Cancellation of the applica- tion shall become effective thirty (30 ) days after receipt of the Notice of Cancellation in the Office of the Department of Planning . 7 . Use or occupancy No building or structure within the planned development or portion thereof as approved for stage development shall be used or occupied , and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made until the Building Official has issued a Certificate of Occupancy thereof as provided under the provisions of the Uniform Building Ordinance #33 Page 21 8. Planned Development precedents The approval of departures from standards ordinarily required for a base district zone , or for any other planned development , shall not be considered as precedent setting when approved for any individual planned development project . 9 . Construction standards -- building permit issuance The provisions of the Uniform Building Code and all other City codes and detailed standards shall apply • and control all design and construction of improvements within a planned development . 10 . Map change and Mapping Map Chance-- Approval by the City Council of the pre- liminary development plan in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance shall constitute approval of the necessary amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the — City of Apache Junction and the map shall be changed in accordance with the approved site area . Whenever a planned development has been approved and remains in effect , the boundary of the planned development shall be indicated on the Zoning Map of the City . 11 . Termination of a Planned Development after completion A planned development may not revert to any base district designation upon completion unless and until all requirements of the base district are complied with . Should the applicant or any transferree or assignee , of an approved planned development wish to discon- tinue the PD use , or uses , upon or after completion , any use , or uses , of the land including the continua- tion of the planned development zoning district designation shall be reviewed and may be approved by Aft. the Council . SECTION II : REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , are hereby repealed . Ordinance #33 Page 22 SECTION III : SEVERABILITY If any section , sub-section , sentence , clause , phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference , is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction , such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof . SECTION IV : EMERGENCY CLAUSE Whereas , it is necessary for the preservation of the peace , health and safety of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , an emergency is declared to exist , and this Ordinance shall become immediately operative and in force from and after the date of posting hereof . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona , this day of , 19 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: D. City Attorne ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM #___ 9t(3 MEETING OF MOTION BY: � SECONDED BY : �9 YES NO , ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN MIARO -DA COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILMAN HILL J VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO _ MAYOR SEEMAN ✓ 1 UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # yz MEETING OF MOTION BY: � SECONDED BY : \k 1 "FS NO , ABSTA r , j COUNCILMAN BURGESS ' COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL / COUNCILMAN SHANKS v VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO v MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • ITEM NO , 6 SPECIAL NOTE : THIS ORDINANCE MUST PASS WITH AN EMERGENCY CLAUSE IF ORDINANCE NO , 34 AND 32 ARE PASSED WITH AN EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AS THIS ORDINANCE IS PART OF A PACKAGE, step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 33 BE READ 3Y TITLE ONLY AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE : This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry, if it does not have a unanimous vote , the City Clerk must read the ordinance in full, ) step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 33 WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR. AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO, 33, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW ARTICLE ENTTILED "ARTICLE XXXIII PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" CONSISTING OF SECTIONS 33 , 01 THROUGH 33 . 11 INCLUSIVE; SECTION 33 . 01 INTENTION AND PURPOSE; SECTION 33, 02 PERMITTED USES; SECTION 33, 03 PROCEDURE; SECTION 33 , 04 DOCUMENTATION CONTENT REQUIRED; SECTION 33 , 05 STAGING; SECTION 33, 06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; SECTION 33. 07 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES; SECTION 33 , 08 MIXED LAND USES; SECTION 33. 09 GENERAL CRITERA; SECTION 33 , 1.0 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISIONS; SECTION 33 , 11. SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING ANY EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED. ( MOTION WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) ITEM NO , 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 33 FOR THE FIRST READING , (ACTION WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) PQACHE ✓ez V -'0y Z Alnik Y .1RiZoNP `6ity on' &4pache 09unction MAY 29, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF TENTATIVE BUDGET Attached for Council action is Resolution No. 80-16, along with the legally required Department of Revenue forms necessary for tentative adoption of the City's 1980-81 budget. Tentative adoption is the legal means by which the public is notified of the time and place of final budget adoption, as well as notifying the public as to related public hearings on the budget. Passage of Resolution No. 80-16 would mean final adoption of the budget would occur at a special meeting of the City Council July 2, 1980 at 6:30 p.m. , following public hearings on the budget and Revenue Sharing uses. Should you have any questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me prior to the meeting. %I) G. RAY 'LEE I' Vim• .7 APPROVED ON.5 7/-`�C FOR AOC!DA OF 4/th-C-...) Attachments . • -;; ��J ` --__... INFJ 7 �»»••• /,.CFO;TS CITY MANAGER pac 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154/ / RESOLUTION NO. 80-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81 ; SETTING FORTH THE TENTATIVE ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR THE PUBLIC EXPENSE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81 , THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES, AND THE AMOUNTS ESTIMATED AS COLLECTABLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81 ; AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TAXPAYERS FOR THE ADOPTING OF THE FINAL BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I Pursuant to the provisions of the laws of the State of Arizona, the statements and schedules herein contained are hereby adopted for the purpose as hereinafter set forth as the Tentative Budget for the City of Apache Junction for the Fiscal Year 1980-81 . SECTION II That the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized and directed to publish in the manner prescribed by law the estimates of expenditures, as hereinafter set forth, together with a notice that the City Council will meet for the purpose of final hearing of taxpayers and for the adoption of the 1980-81 Annual Budget for the City of Apache Junction on the 2nd day of July, 1980 at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction , Arizona. SECTION III Money from any fund may be used for any of these appropriations , except money specifically restricted to State law or by City Ordinance or Resolution. The transfer of any sums within any specific appropriation may be made upon the approval of the City Manager. SECTION IV The statements and schedules of the Tentative Budget are hereinafter set forth in Exhibits A through F. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona this day of , 1980. VIRGINIA SEEMAN Mayor ATTEST: RICH OESTERLE City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CITY /TOWN OF APACHE JUNCTION FISCAL YEAR 1980-81 ARIZONA IDEPAEITTAIIENT OF REVENUE FORM FOR CITY/TOWN •-, UDGETS OFFICIAL FORMS May 1980 (Rev. ) City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION INDEX OF BUDGET SCHEDULES Fiscal Year 1980-81 Letter Resolution of City/Town Council Approving Final Budget For Current Fiscal Year Exhibit A Summary By Funds To Support Direct Property Tax Levy Exhibit B Summary By Source Of All Revenue Other Than Property Taxation Exhibit C Summary Of Department Expenditures Within Each Fund/Department/Program Exhibit D 10% Limit Check on Proposed Expenditures Exhibit E Property Tax Levy Limits Exhibit F Planned Federal Revenue Sharing Use Al ma. Schedule 1 Schedule Of Bonds Authorized And/Or Outstanding For City Purposes Department Budget Detail By Department Within Or Of Each Fund Numbers SPECIAL NOTES: 1 . This index is recommended to be used in support of the final adopted budget. It is not required in the publishing of your preliminary budget. 2. It is suggested that Exhibits A through E listed above be published twice in your official newspaper to satisfy the requirements of A.R.S. 42-302E with a notation that addi- tional detail may be obtained upon contacting your City or Town Clerk's office. Exhibit F should also be published if used. LEVY INCREASE DECLARATION * Pursuant to Section 42-303, Arizona Revised Statutes, the following data on the property tax levy is presented for the information of taxpayers of the City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION • 1980-81 Proposed Property Tax Levy -0- 1979-80 Total Property Tax Levy -0- Difference between 1979-80 & 1980-81 Levy -0- Percentage Change -0- 1979-80 Property Tax Rate -0- 1980-81 Estimated Property Tax Rate -0- The property tax levy for 1980-81 is limited by State Law to the amount levied for 1979-80 unless the City/Town Council authorizes an additional amount. The authori- zation to increase the 1930-81 levy over the 1979-80 levy must be approved during the meeting convened for the final adoption of the City/Town budget. If the Council so authorizes, the property taxes levied for City/Town purposes will be greater than the amount which would otherwise be levied. * If your City/Town property tax levy for 1980-81 exceeds the amount levied for 1979-80, this form must be published with your budget. • City/Town Of APACHE JUNCTION SUMMARY BY FUNDS TO SUPPORT DIRECT PROPERTY TAX LEVY For The Fiscal YEAR 1980-81 As Required By A.R.S. 42-302A ADOPTED EMERGENCIES ESTIMATED ACTUAL ADOPTED AVAILABLE FUNDS BUDGET APPROVED EXPENDITU$E BUDGET AT BEGINNING LESS NON-PROPERTY FUND TRANSFERS BALANCE DIRECT Fund LAST YEAR DURING YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR OF YEAR TAX COLLECTIONS TO FROM PROPERTY TAX LEVY GENERAL FUND (Enter Primary Property Tax if any, at end of this line) 5,482,566 1.314,488 .2.427.017 2.427.017 PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUNDS. OTHER FUNDS Bond Obligations Public Works Reserve _ 50.025 0 1.000 230 770 Highway User Revenue 250.0f0 230,106 217,626 217,626 Federal Revenue Sharing 100,000 0 227,884 11.632 216.252 Federal Grants-in-Trust 150,000 18,647 __ 150.000 150.000 TOTAL .. . 6.032.591 1.553,41 3,023.927 11,862 3,011,66F NOTES& 1. Cash balances should be reported on a basis consistent with 2. Provision for contingencies should be placed in general fund, but may be used, at the prior years and each fund should identify whether determina- discretion of the Council, to offset any fund overexpenditure that might exist at the tion was made on a cash (C), accrual (A) or modified accrual end of the fiscal year (MA) basis 3. All figures may be rounded off to the nearest dollar. EXHI BIT A Sheet 1 of 2 City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION SUMMARY BY SOURCE OF ALL REVENUE OTHER THAN PROPERTY TAXATION Fiscal Year 1980-81 Estimated Budgeted Actual Estimated Revenues Revenues Revenues Source of Revenue Last Year Last Year This Year Federal Government Federal Revenue Sharing 100,000 11,632 227,884 Other Federal Grants. AORCC 52,000 0 34,000 CETA 98,000 12,119 48,000 HIGHWAY SAFETY 68,000 TOTAL • • • • • • 250,000 23,751 377.884 State Government State Shared Sales Tax 500,000 466,701 548,298 State Income Tax Sharing 300,000 257,662 322,846 Highway User Revenue . . . . . 250,000 255,340 217,626 TOTAL 1,05Q,O0n 97A,703 1 ,n2R,77n County Government: Vehicle License Tax • • 100,000 98,673 100,1100 Housing In-Lieu-Tax SRP In-Lieu-Tax TOTAL 100,000 98,673 100,000 City/Town Government Sale of Bonds (give detail) . TOTAL Exhibit B Sheet 2 of 2 City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION SUMMARY BY SOURCE OF ALL REVENUE OTHER THAN PROPERTY TAXATION Fiscal Year 1980-81 Estimated Budgeted Actual Estimated Revenues Revenues Revenues Source of Revenue Last Year Last Year This Year City/Government (continued) City/Town Sales Taxes 1,500,B00 446,572 596,873 City/Town Use Taxes . . Utility Franchise 600,000 0 100,000 Business License Taxes 500,000 0 50,000 Licenses and Permits 550,000 37,429 50,000 Fines and Forfeitures 450,000 75,636 120,000 CABLE TV 600,000 0 Sewerage City Landfill . Libraries • . Other Service Charges Sale/Rental of Property Miscellaneous 250,000 700 25,000 INTEREST 100,000 18,200 15,000 TOTAL • • 4,550,000 578,537 c, f; R7l Public Enterprise Funds. TOTAL Other Funds: PUBLIC 0RKS RESERVE FUND 50,000 + 230 0 CONTINGENCY 500,000 TOTAL 50,000 230 500,000 TOTAL 6,000,000 1 ,680,664 3,023,527 Exhibit B Sheet 1 of 1 City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES WITHIN EACH FUND/DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM Inn Fiscal Year 1980-81 Estimated Adopted Emergencies Actual Adopted Budget Approved Expenditures Budget FUND/DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM Last Year During Year Last Year This Year General Fund:* MAYOR AND COUNCIL 40,000 32,824 51 ,587 CITY MANAGER R6,4R4 CITY CLERK 138,483 ADMINISTRATIVF SFRVICFS 63,106 PLANNING 300,000 62,271 153,627 PUBLIC SAFETY 512,061 708,586 PUBLIC WORKS 1,500,000 79,366 4_9,635 MAGISTRATF COURT 1R2,566 42,737 48,759 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 716,750 ADMINISTRATION 300,000 223,793 • CITY HAI I ACQUISITION 350,000 250,000 FGAI SFRVICFS 120,000 79,423 POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,500,000 FIRE DEPARTMENT 500,000 PARKS AND RECREATION 390,000 17,013 ANIMAL CONTROL 50 000 15,0O0 CONTIGENCY 250 000 TOTAL 5,4R2,566 1 ,314,4RR 2,427,017 Public Enterprise Funds: TOTAL 0 Exhibit C *Summary of Departmental Detail by Department/Fund or Program Sheet 2 of 2 City/Town of APACEE_JUN0II0tL_ SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES WITHIN EACH FUND/DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM Fiscal Year 1980-81 Estimated Adopted Emergencies Actual Adopted Budget Approved Expenditu►es Budget FUND/DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM Last Year During Year Last Year This Year Other Funds Federal Grants-In-Trust 150,000 18,647 150,000 Debt Service . Public Works Reserve Fund. . . . . . 50,025 0 1 ,000 Highway User Revenue 250,000 230,106 217,626 *Federal Revenue Sharing (Itemize) . . 100,000 0 227,884 TOTAL 550,025 248,753 TOTAL 6,032,591 1 ,563,241 3,021,527 ..h Notes: 1 Total of Adopted Budget for the current fiscal year shown on this Exhibit must agree with similar total shown on Exhibit A 2. Detail for each department listed above should be reported on departmental schedules. *3. Federal revenue sharing expenditures must be itemized. You may either ►temize the expenditures here or use Exhibit F. Exhibit C City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION r 10% LIMIT CHECK ON PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 1980-81 ADOPTED BUDGET PROPOSED BUDGET LAST YEAR THIS YEAR TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 6,032,591 3,023,527 LESS STATUTORY EXCLUSIONS FROM 10% LIMIT Elections (42-303) 6,000 Cemeteries (42-303) Public Safety Personnel Retirement 52,792 Firemen's Pensions (9-951F) State Retirement System/Plan & OASI 50,000 36,522 P.W.R. (42-306) 1 ,000 6►:hway User Revenue 250,000 217,626 nary (up to 15C tax rate could raise, if allowed) • Utilities (42-303) Water Sewer Garbage and Rubbish Debt Service (42-303) Federal Grants-In-Aid (AG Concurring 5/31/67) 150,000 150,000 Federal Revenue Sharing (AG Concurring 12/7/72) 100,000 227,884 Unemployment Compensation Contribution (23-752) TOTAL EXCLUSIONS 550,000 691 ,824 DIFFERENCE-(Subject To Limitation(Subtract Exclusions from Appropriation) 5,482,591 2,331 ,703 ADD - Annexation Allowance (42-305.01 ) XXXXXXXX TOTAL - Subject to 10% Limitation 5,482,591 ,X X X X X X X X ADL - 10% Allowable Increase Over Last Year 548,259 XXXXXXXX LEGAL LIMIT 6,030,850 2,331,703 UNDER OR (OVER) LEGAL LIMIT FOR THIS YEAR 3,699,147 xXix EXHIBIT D City/Town of APACNF JHNCTTfN. PROPERTY TAX LEVY LIMITS FISCAL YEAR 1980-81 1979-80 Maximum Actual Maximum Allowable 1980-81 Estimated 1980-81 Primary Allowable 1980-81 Actual Assessed Tax Levy Increase Levy Levy Value Rate PRIMARY LEVY (1 ) (2) (3) SECONDARY LEVY - DEBT SERVICE (4) (5) TOTAL N/A N/A N/A (1 ) Add the 1979-80 total property tax levy to the amount collected from SRP in-lieu payment, if any. The 1979-80 primary property tax is determined by subtracting, from the total 1979-80 levy, plus SRP payments , debt service for general obligation bonds funded directly or indirectly by property tax or other general fund revenue. (2) Increase in primary levy is limited to 7% or increase in assessed valuation from 1979-80 to 1980-81 , whichever is less. (3) The assessed valuation for primary purposes will be based on assessed valuation increases, which are limited. (4) There is no limitation on increase in secondary levies. The amount necessary to pay general obligation debt service may be levied. (5) The assessed valuation for secondary purposes will be based on the assessed valuation base without limited increases. NOTES: A. This form assumes that the voters will approve the proposed changes to the Constitution contained in SCR 1001 on June 3. B. Calculation of maximum allowable levy is pursuant to section 42-301 which allows maintenance of base regardless of whether actual levy is less than maximum allowed. ,HIBIT E . City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION PLANNED FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING USE Fiscal Year 1980-81 Use Planned Use Last Year This Year OPERATING BUDGET: GFNFRAI GOVFRNMFNT - 100,000 Total 1nn,nnn CAPITAL OUTLAY• GFNFRAL GOVERNMENT 33,000 PUBLIC SAFETY 76,100 RBI IC WORKS 18,784 Total . 127,884 TOTAL 0 227,884 NOTE - 1. You may itemize your planned federal revenue sharing expenditures here or on Exhibit C. Exhibit F (optional see note) City/Town of APACHE JUNCTION Sheet 1 of 1 SCHEDULE OF BONDS AUTHORIZED AND/OR OUTSTANDING FOR CITY PURPOSES June 30, 19_ Payments Due In Next Amount Held Date Of Amount Of Rate Of Amount Fiscal Year(1) In Sinking Description of Issue Bond Issue Original Issue Interest Outstanding Principal Interest Fund N/A TOTAL THIS PAGE Notes. 1. The total of principal and interest due to be paid I he next fiscal year must agree with the amount budgeted for the current year as reported on Exhi( Schedule 1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF • MOTION BY: 5 SECONDED BY : J C-r _ YES "JO A STAI COUNCILMAN SHANKS - ✓ COUNCILMAN BUJRGFSS COUNCILMAN FTDSON COUNCILMAN HTI L COUNCILMAN fAMTANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO V MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: 74.„, ITEM NO, 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO, 80-16, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 80-16, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81; SETTING FORTH THE TENTATIVE ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR THE P!BLIC EXPENSE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81, THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES, AND THE AMOUNTS ESTIMATED AS COLLECTABLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81, T , T '., TLRE-;- -ft -AMOUPvTI`S ESTIMATED- COLLE 19 81; AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TAXPAYERS FOR THE ADOPTING OF THE FINAL BUDGET, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED , FOR APPROVAL • • • cI- ITEM NO, 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO, 80-16, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 80-16, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81; SETTING FORTH THE TENTATIVE ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNTS REQUIRED FOR THE PUBLIC EXPENSE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUCNTION, ARIZONA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81, THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES, AND THE AMOUNTS ESTIMATED AS COLLECTABLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81, THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES, AND THE AMOUNTS ESTIMATED AS COLLECTABLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1980-81; AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TAXPAYERS FOR THE ADOPTING OF THE FINAL BUDGET, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED , FOR DENIAL (:,s,ACHE G 0 .-. 4R,ZoNP `Ooity o� 04pache 09unctzon May 28, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID - PHOTO COPY MACHINE Attached is a copy of the bid opening minutes for Project No. ND-80-1 Photo Copy Machine as well as a copy of the bid proposal submitted by IBM. Although 4 companies received bid packets, only IBM responded. After reviewing the bid from IBM with the current price book from the company we currently lease a copier from (Xerox) , the City will save approximately $1,000.00 over the period of a 12 month lease, with add- itional savings possible on a 2-year lease. The IBM machine also offers extra features, such as automatic two sided copying, which comparable machines do not offer in this price range. I recommend acceptance of the IBM proposal for a 2-year extended lease which offers the City the lowest available lease cost. Rich Oesterle City Clerk RO:icb ITEM t':a. . ..._.......a If P r _ / - . ----- L): ; :'.e it 5 / _ INFO/REPORTS CITY MAMA ER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 (--siCHE,-- G F� i-Fa1t O U ;i . Z 4Pizo....) txP `Oily o C4acie 09unction BID OPENING PROJECT NO. ND-80-1 PHOTO COPY MANCHINE MAY 19, 1980 1:45 P.M. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Present: Rich Oesterle, City Clerk; Marlis Davis, Director of Administrative Services; Isabel C. Ballard, Deputy City Clerk and Jerry Mundy, IBM. The meeting opened at 1:45 P.M. in the City Clerk's Office. Mr. Rich Oesterle City Clerk, announced that one bid has been received and bids are now closed. �,.. Mr. Oesterle opened the Bid from IBM, 4502 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85012. The Bid is as follows: Item 1. Purchase of IBM Series III Copier with 20 sorting bins TOTAL BID BASE $29,361.73 Item 2. Monthly lease of IBM series III Copier with 20 sorting bins - 30 day contract basic charge includes 1st 15,000 copies each month. TOTAL BID BASE $ 1,164.50 Item 3. 12 -Month lease of IBM Series III Copier with 20 sorting bins - basic charge includes 1st 15,000 copies each month. TOTAL BID BASE $ 1,044.36 INDICATED ESTIMATED DELIVERY DATE: Approximately six weeks Aternatives were attached to the bid proposal explaining the IBM copier lease plans available to governmental agencies. There being no further bids, the meeting was closed. '?-ez/ ^ --71- Rich Oesterle City Clerk RO:icb 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 BID PROPOSAL PROJECT NO. ND-80-1 PHOTO COPY MACHINE FIRM NAME: IBM ADDRESS: 4502 Norht Central Avenue TELEPHONE NUMBER: 263-2828 DATE: 5-19-80 MAKE AND/OR MODEL OF EQUIPMENT: IBM Series III - Model 20 - 20 bins ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT BID 1. Purchase of: IBM Series III Copier with 20 sorting bins ($ 23 ,607 . 00 ) per each 1 $ 23,607 . 00 la. Purchase of 20 bin colator $ 4, 117 . 50 lb. Sales Tax @ 5 % $ 1 , 386. 23 lc. Installation cost $ N/A ld. Delivery to Apache Junction $ 251 . 00 TOTAL BASE BID (Items 1 + la + lb + lc + Id) $ 29 , 361 . 73 2. Monthly lease of: IBM Series III Copier with 20 sorting bins -- 30 day contract basic charge includes 1st 15 ,000 copies each month ($ 750 . 00 ) per each 1 $ 750 . 00 BID PROPOSAL PROJECT NO. ND-80-1 Page 2 2a. Monthly lease of 20 Bin Colator $ 120 . 00 2b. Sales Tax @ 5 % $ 43.50 2c. Installation Cost $ N/A 2d. Delivery to Apache Junction $ 251 . 00 TOTAL BASE BID (Items 2 + 2a + 2b + 2c + 2d) $ 1 ,164. 50 3. 12 - Month lease of: IBM Series III Copier with 20 sorting bins -- basic charge includes 1st 15 ,000 copies each month ($ 651 . 37 ) per each 1 $ 651 . 37 3a. 12 - Month lease of 20 Bin Colator $ 104 . 21 3b. Sales Tax @ 5 % $ 37 . 78 3c. Installation Cost $ N/A 3d. Delivery to Apache Junction $ 251 . 00 TOTAL BASE BID (Items 3 + 3a + 3b + 3c + 3d) $ 1 ,044. 36 INDICATE ESTIMATED DELIVERY DATE: Approximately 6 wPPks I certify that I have read and understand all specifications, conditions, and/ or stipulations contained in this bid form and affixing my signature hereto signifies acceptance thereof. I further agree that if awarded the bid by the Apache Junction City Council within thirty (30) days after the bid opening date, I will supply the foregoing equipment within the time specified and for the amount indicated on the proposal . BY: 7/14// /7 Sj nature o, Aut orized Re resentative ( Jerry Mundy Name of Signatory (print or type) Account Representative line (print or type) International Business Machines Corporation 4502 North Central Avenue Phoenix,Arizona 85012 602/263-2000 Gentlemen: Please accept this as an attachment to the enclosed bid. IBM offers copier lease plans other than those you have requested on your bid. I would like to propose these for your consideration. Under the terms and conditions of these lease plans , you would accrue $485 . 00 per month toward the purchase price of the copier and $60 . 50 per month toward the purchase price of the collator. Your accruals would continue until you reached a level equal to 50% of said purchase price. Extende Term Fiscal Lease Basic charge 617 . 60 Copies included (15 ,000) Additional copies (15 , 000 to 30 ,000) . 0173 Additional copies (30 ,000 plus) . 011 Collator charge 98. 42 Under this contract , if your copier is installed prior to July 1 , 1980 , we will guarantee this price to June 30 , 1981 . State and Local Government Lease Basic charge 679. 40 Copies included (15 ,000) Additional copies (15 , 000 to 30 ,000) . 019 Additional copies (30 ,000 plus) . 012 Collator charge 108. 30 Under this contract your monthly accruals increase from 50% of the purchase price of the equipment to 75% of said purchase price. Prices quoted are firm thru the term of the State and Local Government contract and are subject to the terms and conditions of that contract . Thank you for your consideration. 'ncerel, , erry Mundy Account Representative ROLL CALL VOTE Si;EET NOTES ITEM # 14) MEETING OF MOTION BY: '0) SECONDED BY : /U 1 1 YES NO ABSTAIN , COUNCILMAN HIL! COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN SHANKS V COUNCILMAN BURGESS • COUNCILMAN EIDSON v VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO I MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: s7N • • • • ITEM NO , 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PROJECT NO, ND-80-1, PHOTO COPY MACHINE, BE AND HEREBY IS AWARDED TO IBM FOR A 2-YEAR EXTENDED LEASE, FROM ACCOUNT NO , 1. 1556, FY 1980-81 BUDGET, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY CLERK, FOR APPROVAL • • • • • ITEM NO, 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PROJECT NO, ND-80-1, PHOTO COPY MACHINE, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED , FOR DENIAL PQACHF G O y0.04 U ji M Y Z qR/ZOO' COity o� @ pache cOunctian May 22, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: Rich Oesterle, City Clerk THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager yi)t3/FROM: Richard W. Broman, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: City Hall Complex - Paving Improvements Returned are the bids for your file. Please include parking lot improvements for action by the City Council at the 4 June 1980 meeting. .r. If the Council awards the bid on 4 June 1980, an estimated schedule would be: 4 June - Council awards bid 5 June - Contractor notified 19 June - Latest date per specifications to begin construction 10 July - Construction complete 11 July - City acceptance of construction 12 July - City complex dedication 10 August Payment due contractor (30 days after acceptance by City) Note: It is possible this construction schedule could be accelerated by a couple of weeks. IOW RWB:an encl. /�� ITEM No. 9 __--- AP;i OViD ON ,(- /e OI ) FOR AGE.! A C yl�t'P BUYNESS - INFO/ REPORTS CITY MANAGER c_f 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 tTTITC.+ 1R/ZoNP 2ty o� &4pachP 09unct2on May 22, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager r4 .>) '1FROM: Richard W. Broman, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: City Hall Complex Parking Improvements Bids have been received from six (6) contractors for parking improvements to the new city complex. Improvements were phased and options were provided for in order to minimize expenses. Essentially, improvements call for grading, curb, paving, storm retention and storm drainage for a portion of the complex. As the City is presently asking developers to comply with proposed improvement guidelines,it seems the City should set a good example. Also, improvements are needed to control dust, route traffic and provide a means of routing storm water, while reducing erosion. During the previous construction, when it rained, mud and rocks were tracked on the new carpets and tiles. Not paving will certainly increase our liability and building maintenance costs as well as reduce the life and appearance of the new units. This department recommends that Professional Contracting Co. , Inc. be awarded the contract as the lowest and most qualified bidder. Their low bid for option number three was $44,762.40. The next highest bid was $53,882.00 (Ricor, Inc. ,) and the highest bid was $75,079.50 (Bentson Contracting Co.) . RWB/an 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 PQp,CHF Gti _ O V .4,0 v Z )-: �R�zoNP Wily pac/ie unction BID OPENING PROJECT NO. PW-SO-6 PARKING IMPROVEMENTS - CITY HALL COMPLEX MAY 19, 1980 2:00 P.M. CITY CLERK's OFFICE Present: Rich Oesterle, City Clerk; Rich Broman, Director of Public Works; Isabel C. Ballard, Deputy City Clerk; Wayne Rawlings, Ricor, Inc. ; Jim Varnes, Ken Hoover Construction Co. ; Bentson Markham, Markham Contracting Co. ; Estimator from Brisco, Inc. ; Duane Ross, Estimator for Professional Contracting; and Assistant Manager from Arizona Crushing. The meeting opened at 2:00 P.M. in the City Clerk's Office. Mr. Rich Oesterle, City Clerk, closed the acceptance of bids and announced that •-a six bids have been received at this time. The bids were opened as follows: 1. Professional Contracting Co. , Inc. , P. 0. Box 26029, Tempe, Arizona 85282: Submitted a Bid Bond in the amount of 5% of their bid. Option No. 1 - $33,082.80 2 - $43,562.40 3 - $44,762.40 No exceptions to the bid. Signed by Glenn E. King Jr. , President 2. Markham Contracting Co. , Inc. , 2010 W. Ironwood, Phoenix, Arizona 85021: Submitted a Bid Bond in the amount of 5% of their bid. Option No. 1 - $43,659.00 2 - $56,873.00 3 - $58,469.00 No exceptions to the bid. Signed by Brian Markham, Estimator 3. Brisco, Inc. , P. 0. Box 3766, Phoenix, Arizona 85030: Submitted a Bid Bond in the amount of 5% of their bid. Option No. 1 - $46,149.10 .� 2 - $14,612.50 to be added to Option No. 1 3 - $17,404.55 to be added to Option No. 1 No exceptions to the bid. Signed by R. L. Tenboel , Secretary/Treasurer 4. Bentson Contracting Company, P. 0. Box 8007, Phoenix, Arizona 85066: Submitted a Bid Bond in the amount of 5% of their bid. Option No. 1 - $54,873.10 2 - $73,950.50 3 - $75,079.50 No exceptions to the bid. Signed by L. F. Phillips, Vice President 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 BID OPENING PROJECT NO. PW-80-6 Page 2 5. Ken Hover Construction Co. , P. O. Box 1561, Mesa, Arizona 85201: Submitted a cashier's check in the amount of 5% of bid in lieu of Bid Bond. Option No. 1 - $42,900.00 2 - $58,900.00 3 - $60,655.00 No exception to the bid. Signed by William F. Wood, President • 6. Ricor, Inc. , 5757 N. Black Canyon, Suite 5, Phoenix, Arizona 85015: Submitted a Bid Bond in the amount of 5% of their bid. Option No. 1 - $37,150.70 2 - $51,982.00 3 - $53,882.00 No exception to the bid. Signed by Wayne E. Rawlings, President Mr. Rich Oesterle, requested that the following bid be returned unopened due to the fact that it was received after the bid closing: There being no further bids, the meeting was closed. Rich Oesterle City Clerk RO/icb ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : 6C1. 1 YES NO ABSTA T "J COUNCILMAN SAL V COUNCILMAN SHANKS I COUNCILMAN PURGESS ' COUNCILMAN EIDSON v COUNCILMAN HILL VICE-MAYOR GRAN I LLO v/ MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS I IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: "�., • - { tt� ITEM NO , 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PROJECT NO, PW-80-6, CITY HALL COMPLEX, PAVING IMPROVEMENTS, BE AND HEREBY IS AWARDED TO PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTING CO„ INC. , IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,762 , 40, FROM ACCOUNT NO , 16-755, FY 1979-80 PUNET AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS . EP-1PPRfVAI ya • • • • ITEM NO, 9 E AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACH IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PROJECT NO, PW-80-6, CITY HALL COMPLEX, BE AND HEREBY ARE DENIED, PAVING IMPROVEMENTS, BIDS FOR DENIAL iP4ACH s O 1 ti0 aw 4-:1Z .....) 0-VI: `--0 ity Ue (9IGLc 8 unction May 21, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Richard W. Broman, Director of. Public Works THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager SUBJECT: Apache Villa IV This Department has inspected the construction of streets in — Apache Villa IV and finds them to be constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Attached is a punchlist of items that have been completed. Acceptance by the council is recommended for addition to the city street inventory and future maintenance thereof. RWB/an attach. -°'` �.r� AFP^O+'LD ON ITEM �. OP41: .a:�,� 11 FOR AGENDA OF.4.„,_ �Z__ Y___- N:\V G,,S1i.cSScay... MANAGER cio INFO/REPORTS 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 PL. /\ N FOR 'VILLA .: ... FIVE FOUR , DF UNIT SIX _ fl� y ,,eid tr 10 sic' to S. �-wv �0, 705 a o ?-a 7 Q O , �, b aQ r Q 6.t0.sp ...-.4,s, .Po.goi n i CJ Z ( J1 ki vl %) j / , ?y/s •-•47:67O,TEC T /, is- ,9i-0- • LOC,gT/D/(/ /14.9/a • • April 30, 19v0 Professional Contracting Co., Inc. P.O. Bon 26029 Tempe, Arizona 55232 Attention: ss. Tara Irvine, Field Coordinator RE: APAEHE VILLA IV Dear MS. Irving: In response to your letter of April 24, I inspected Apache Villa IV this rorninz. Call your attention to our puncniist dated April 9, 1Y30. The only iwaes t..at have been corrected are items number 3, 5 and 3. Until such tine as the entire list of repairs are completed, the City will not accept the streets. Sincerely, Leo Frazier Jr. Building Official LF:sw Attach: Punchlist CcGreg Gibbons/Standaze-Truitt Engineerin3 Ltd. Richard Erozian/i ircctor of Public Works Glade Soelberg/ ay :.onea Enterprises, Inc. file April 9. 1930 Profe3sir1,11 Contracting Coy any. Ina. ' P.O. Pox "46029 922 W. 1st. Ctrc-2t Tampa, AZ £5252 Attention: £a s in Kinser RE: Fu:?chlist - 7ac':o Villa IV Dear 2•:r. i;f nsor: Following is a punch1ist ado upon is:4ectioi of t'_s strcc.rs in Apache Villa IV: 1. South Mara rrivo - Cy ck :-?at curb. 2. Saguaro & 14th. - ?ct,laco portion a r:_tnr (o t�Oi.;. is-� : a3t CCi l r) . 3. Sazu=iro - Fnuth end of ..,z :t - _;cter pondi ng. Extend c::a13 to south to of ^mate 4. South ','11ra 7riva - Cracked curb '.qcst sida at alley and east side at *5• z'ourtcrnth Av)7we - At entry fro-2 Iron:load - Vator service leaking-on ro. th side. 6. Iron oad and t':st 12th. kie:aue - Cracked apron on north 7. I::oa ood south of 12th. Avenue - Relocate telep':-one junction boys. a. South end Iro:good - Cracked curb - Pave to tsst for storm rout43. Func'.l1ist - Apache Villa IV Cont 'd. Page 2 4/9/K.; 9. Dress up beeind curb on ell streets. Sincerely. Leo Fraziar Jr. Building Official/Zoning A,1-ninistrator LF:ww cc: Crag Gib`:ans/Stans?azc-Truitt rnFincering Ltd. Bob _?are/ Arizona ':Tatar Co:. may -, Richard nro►ran/i)irec:tor of Public ::arks '. file • ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: • YFS NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN EIDSON. v COUNCILMAN SHANKS . COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN BURGESS / COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO V MAYOR SEEMAN V I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: 41 • Ilv ITEM NO, 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE STREETS IN APACHE VILLA IV BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF STREET MAINTENANCE, FOR APPROVAL • • ITEM NO, 10 BE IT RESOVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE STREETS IN APACHE VILLA IV BE AND HEREBY ARE DENIED FOR THE PURPOSE OF STREET MAINTENANCE, FOR DENIAL ,„HF✓G .4 � .. z �R,ZoNP ztf &479ac/ze 09unctzon May 14, 1980 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: Ray Lee, City Manager FROM: Richard W. Broman, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Airport Study Attached are resolutions to authorize the City Manager to file an application for state aid and to approve consulting services for an airport study. This department has reviewed the attachments with the members of the Airport Committee and the City Attorney and recommends approval accordingly. RWB:sw !'ERRING APPROVED ON .__.. J ..J ;:uSINESS FOR AGENDA OF `CP O 5 _ . Y !I:NJ BUSINESS w INFO/REPORTS /2 ' - CITY MANAGER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602)982-6154 RESOLUTION NO. 80-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE A PROJECT APPLICATION FOR STATE AID IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000 TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTION STUDY; AND FURTHER DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACT AS THE OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE IN CONNECTION WITH SAID APPLICATION. WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to complete an Airport Master Plan and Site Selection Study for the City of Apache Junction; and WHEREAS, the Study shall be prepared at a cost of $60,000; and WHEREAS, the maximum cost to the City shall not exceed $6,000, with the remaining $54,000 proposed to be funded with State funds through the Arizona Department of Transportation (for State Aid for Development of Public Airports). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction that the City Manager of the City of Apache Junction , Arizona be and is authorized, empowered, and directed to file a project application for State aid of $54,000 for said Study and act as Official Representative in connection with this application. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1980. VIRGINIA SEEMAN Mayor ATTEST: RICH OESTERLE City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: �kX 5.{\ Co-cer—c3,. City Attorney o�� PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACT This Agreement , entered into as of this day of, , 1980 by and between: The City of Apache Junction, Arizona 150 North Ocotillo hereinafter referred to P. 0. Box K as the SPONSOR Apache Junction AZ 85220 AND: Buell Winter Mousel & Associates, Inc. 1130 East Missouri hereinafter referred to Camelot Square - Suite 600 as the CONSULTANT Phoenix, Arizona 85014 FOR THE PURPOSE of providing the following planning services: Airport Master Plan & Site Selection Study hereinafter referred to for as the PROJECT Apache Junction , Arizona DO HEREBY, Mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 - CONSULTANTS SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. 1 Employment of the Consultant. The Sponsor hereby agrees to engage the Consultant and his specified subcontractors who in turn agree to perform the • technical and professional services necessary to produce the Project. Further- more, it is expressly understood that the Arizona Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division has the right to approve the terms and conditions of this Agreement as well as the proposed scope and costs of the technical and professional services to be conducted as a part of the Project. In addition, this Agreement is contingent upon issuance of a State Grant in the amount of Fifty Four Thousand Dollars ($54,000) for the purpose of providing the State share of the cost of the Project. 1.2 Scope of Services. The Consultant shall do, perform and carry out in a satisfactory and proper manner, as determined by the Sponsor and the State of Arizona, the services generally outlined below and specifically indicated in Exhibit A - Scope of Services, attached and incorporated by reference hereto. 1.3 Notice to Proceed. The official notice to proceed will be issued only after the Sponsor has received the Project Grant from the State of Arizona. The Consultant can proceed with work elements associated with this project prior to the issuance of a Project Grant at his own risk if he so desires . The Sponsor will not be liable for claims for services performed until the State of Arizona has awarded the Project Grant and the official Notice to Proceed has been issued. 1.4 Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant shall be undertaken and completed in the sequence shown in Appendix B - Project Schedule, attached and incorporated by reference hereto. Total time of performance shall not exceed twelve (12) months. 1.5 Responsibility of the Consultant. The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and the 1 coordination of all services provided by the Consultant under this contract. The Consultant shall , without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies in any documentation prepared in association with this Project. ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT 2. 1 Compensation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the • total compensation to be paid to the Consultant shall be a firm fixed price amount of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000) for the services specified in Exhibit A - Scope of Services. Such sum shall constitute full and complete j compensation for the Consultant ' s services , as identified in Exhibit C - Cost Summary, attached and incorporated by reference hereto. 2.2 Method of Payment. The Sponsor shall pay to the Consultant not more 1 than the fixed price amount set out in Article 2. 1 above. Payments shall be at monthly intervals subject to receipt of requisitions for payments !: from the Consultant specifying that he has performed the work and is entitled to the amount requisitioned under the terms of this Agreement. Ten percent (10 ) of the total value of Work completed shall be retained by the Sponsor until satisfactory completion of the Project. 2.3 Consultant Responsibilities for Compensation. The Consultant shall prepare monthly invoices and progress reports which clearly indicate the progress to date and the amount of compensation due by virture of that progress. All requisitions for payment shall be for work completed unless otherwise agreed to by the Sponsor. The Consultant shall also prepare the necessary State forms and Requisition for Payment under the Project Grant requirements for the State of Arizona. 2.4 Sponsor Responsibilities for Compensation. The Sponsor agrees to pay the Consultant 's invoices net upon receipt. At no time will payment of requisitions exceed thirty (30) days from the date of the invoice without written notification to the Consultant . It is expressly understood that the payment process outlined above builds in provisions for the Consultant to carry Project costs for no more than Sixty (60) days to minimize interest overheads and provide more planning manhours for each Project dollar. It is also expressly understood that the Sponsor has the right to withhold payment on any invoice if he feels that the Consultant has not performed the requisitioned work efforts in a satisfactory manner. If the Sponsor does decide to withhold payment to the Consultant for any reason he must provide written notification and an explanation to the Consultant within ten (10) days of the date of the invoice. ARTICLE 3 - CHANGES TO THE SCOPE OF SERVICES The Sponsor may, at any time, and by written order, make changes in the services to be performed under this Agreement. If such changes cause an increase or decrease in the Consultant 's cost or time required for performance of any services under this contract, an equitable adjustment shall be made and the contract shall be modified in writing accordingly. Any claim of the Consultant for adjustment under this clause must be submitted in writing within 30 days from the date or receipt by the Consultant of the notification of change. No services for which an additional cost or fee will be charged by the Consultant shall be furnished without the prior written authorization of the Sponsor. ARTICLE 4 - TERMINATION OF THE AGREEMENT The Sponsor may, by written notice to the Consultant , terminate this contract in whole or in part at any time , either for the Sponsor's • convenience or because of the failure of the Consultant to fulfill his contract obligations. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant shall : (1) immediately discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise) , and (2) deliver to the Sponsor all data, drawings , reports, estimates, summaries , and such other information and materials � . as may have been accumulated by the Consultant in performing this contract , whether completed or in process. If the termination is for the convenience of the Sponsor, an equitable adjustment in the contract price shall be made, but no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services. If the termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill his contract obligations , the Sponsor may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or otherwise. • ARTICLE 5 - ASSURANCES • 5.1 Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not: 5.1 .1 employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide • employee working for the Consultant ; to solicit or secure this Agreement , or paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, any commission, percentage , brokerage fee, gift , or any other consideration , contingent upon or resulting from the award or making —• of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Sponsor shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or, in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage , brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. 5.1.2 paid or agreed to pay to any firm, organization, or person (other t than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant) any fees, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated: 5.2 Compliance with Equal Employment Opportunity. The Consultant agrees to comply with the regulations relating to nondiscrimination whether State or Federal , and agrees to make similar provisions in all contracts with any subcontractors used in the performance of this Project. 5.3 Ownership of Documents and Other Data. The Consultant agrees that all drawings, reports, estimates, summaries , notes, and other work developed in the performance of this contract shall be and remain the sole property of the Sponsor and may be used on any other work without additional compensation to the Consultant. With respect thereto, the Consultant agrees not to assert any rights and not to establish any claim under copyright laws. The Consultant for a period of three (3) years after completion of the Project, agrees to furnish and provide access to all retained materials on • the request of the Sponsor. Unless otherwise provided in the contract , the Consultant shall have the right to retain copies of all such materials beyond such period. 5.4 Examination of Records. The Consultant agrees that duly authorized representatives from the State of Arizona and the Sponsor shall , until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this contract , have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books , documents, papers , and records of the Consultant involving transactions related to this contract. 5.5 Subcontractors , Outside Associates and Consultants. The Consultant agrees that any subcontractors and outside associates or consultants required by the Consultant in connection with the services covered by the contract will be limited to Coffman Associates of Kansas City, Missouri . Any substitution in such subcontractors, associates , or consultants will be subject to the prior written approval of the Sponsor. 5.6 Procurement Standards. The Consultant understands and agrees that the type of procuring instruments used (i .e. fixed price contracts, cost reimbursable contracts , purchase orders , incentive contracts , etc. ) , shall be appropriate for the particular procurement and for promoting the best interest of the Project. Furthermore, the Consultant certifies that the "cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost" method of contracting shall not be used. ARTICLE 6 - SUSPENSION OF WORK `! 1 The Sponsor may order the Consultant , in writing, to suspend all or any ! ;' 40. part of the work for such period of time as he may determine to be 1 t. appropriate for the convenience of the Sponsor. If the performance of all or any part of the work is, for any unreasonable period of time, suspended or delayed by an act of the Sponsor in the administration of this contract , or by its failure to act within the time specified in this contract (or if no time is specified, within a reasonable time) , an adjustment shall be made for any increase in cost of performance of this contract necessarily caused by such unreasonable suspension or delay , and the contract modified in writing accordingly. However, no adjustment shall be made under this clause for any suspension or delay to the extent (1 ) that performance would have been suspended or delayed by any other cause, including the fault or negligence of the Consultant or (2) for which an equitable adjustment is provided for or excluded under any other provision of this contract. ARTICLE 7 - COMPOSITION OF CONSULTANT If the Consultant is comprised of more than one legal entity, each such I; entity shall be jointly and severally liable. ARTICLE 8 - INTERESTS AND BENEFITS 8. 1 Interest of Consultant. The Consultant covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest , direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed under this Contract. The Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Contract no person I `• - having any such interest shall be employed. 8.2 Interest of Members of Sponsor and Others. No officer, member or employee of the Sponsor and no members of its governing body, who exercises any functions or responsibilities in the review or approval , ' of the undertaking or carrying out of the services to be performed under this Contract , shall participate in any decision relating to the contract which affects his personal interest or have any personal or pecuniary interest, direct or indirect , in the Contract or the proceeds thereof. ARTICLE 9 - ASSIGNABILITY The Consultant shall not assign any interest in this contract , and shall not transfer any interest in the same without the prior written consent of the Sponsor thereto, provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to the Consultant from the Sponsor under this contract may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval . Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the Sponsor. s. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor and the Consultant have executed this AGREEMENT as of the date first written. . BUELL WINTER MOUSEL THE CITY OF & ASSOCIATES, INC. APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA By By J Jerry W. Novacek G. Ray Lee - City Manager Attest: Exhibit A - Scope of Services Exhibit B - Project Schedule Approved as to Adel t-ca+` - S� Exhibit C - Cost Summary BY 4 • • EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES • PART I - TASK LISTING Element 1- Inventory Task 1 . 1 Obtain Background Data Task 1 .2 Obtain Land Use Data Task 1 .3 Obtain Environmental Data Task 1 .4 Obtain Socioeconomic Data Task 1 .5 Obtain Existing Area Airport Data Task 1 .6 Identify Area Registered Aircraft Task 1 .7 Assemble Weather Data Task 1 .8 Prepare Basic Reference Map Task 1 .9 Prepare Inventory Working Paper Task 1 .10 Prepare Public Information Brochure .•. Task 1. 11 Prepare Planning Advisory Committee Workbooks Element 2- Forecasts Task 2.1 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Task 2.2 Determine Airport Site Area Task 2.3 Develop Airport Activity Forecasts Task 2.4 Establish Airport Requirements Task 2.5 Prepare Forecasts Working Paper Element 3- Preliminary Site Analysis Task 3.1 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Task 3.2 Conduct Public Information Meeting Task 3.3 Perform Overlay Analysis Task 3.4 Identify Potential Airport Sites Task 3.5 Engineering Site Rating Analysis Task 3.6 Environmental Site Rating Analysis Task 3.7 Prepare Selection of Candidate Sites Working Paper Task 3.8 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Task 3.9 Determine Land Ownership Element 4- Refined Site Analysis Task 4.1 Evaluate Airspace Considerations Task 4.2 Refine Site Requirements Task 4.3 Estimate Development Costs Task 4.4 Prepare General Site Layouts Task 4.5 Prepare Aircraft Noise Contours Element 5- Site Selection ,m Task 5. 1 Conduct FAA Site Inspection . Task 5.2 Prepare Candidate Sites Working Paper Task 5.3 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Task 5.4 Conduct Public Information Meeting Task 5.5 Determine Recommended Site Task 5.6 Assemble Environmental Assessment Document Task 5.7 Conduct Public Hearing on Site Selection Task 5.8 Prepare Final Environmental Assessment Document Element 6- Plans and Reports Task 6.1 Refine Development Schedule Task 6.2 Refine Cost Estimates Task 6.3 Develop Financial Plan Task 6.4 Economic Feasibility Evaluation Task 6.5 Prepare Airport Layout Plans Task 6.6 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Task 6.7 Prepare Master Plan Report F . t re 1 "g 1 {. 1 � 1 . 6 PART II - TASK DESCRIPTIONS ELEMENT 1 - INVENTORY Task 1 . 1 Obtain Background Data Description: Obtain copies of any existing reports , plans , photographs or other documents which may provide data on area trans- portation systems , utilities , jurisdictional boundaries or other data and information pertinent to the master plan study. Assemble , catalogue and review all data for use in later tasks of the study and to support inquiries and interviews in the local area. Output: Organized reference file to support master plan analyses. Task 1 .2 Obtain Land Use Data Description: Obtain copies of existing local community planning and land use regulations contained in existing documentation and mapping. This effort will concentrate on identifying boundaries under some formal jurisdictional control and the land uses by type that may have been established for the airport siting area. These types will be general and will include but not be limited to residential , commercial , industrial , agricultural , recreation, conservation , and public uses. In addition available information will be obtained that will identify the physical characteristics which may influence construction and planning for an airport. These characteristics include soil classifications , topographic conditions , flood hazard area, public utilities , drainage and flood control works , major power and pipeline rights-of-way, railroads , and key ground transportation routes. Preliminary discussions will also be held with area planning agencies to determine procedures for obtaining assurances that compatible land uses can be maintained around a new airport. Output: Land use assurances data for environmental assessment. Task 1 .3 Obtain Environmental Data Description: Identify and assess the status of natural environmental factors that may be of particular significance to selection of a new airport site such as. a - Ambient air quality conditions and standards - Water quality standards , conditions and resources - Plant and acquatic life indigenous to the area - Archaeological considerations - Prime farmland identification and status - Present and planned public parks , recreation areas, wildlife refuges, historic sites , and monuments - Wildlife and waterfowl , endangered species - Solid waste and sewage disposal regulations and facilities This information will be compiled for later use in evaluating direct environmental relationships of the airport. Output : Environmental background data. Task 1 .4 Obtain Socioeconomic Data Description• Obtain area-wide socioeconomic data and update and verify the projections and content where necessary. This effort will include population data, income, and employment. Review existing data available on factors that may reveal a potential for induced or secondary socioeconomic impacts such as shifts in human settlement patterns , changes in population growth, public service demands , and any changes to business or economic activity. .r. Output: Socioeconomic background data. Task 1 .5 Obtain Existing Area Airport Data Description: Each area airport will be inspected to determine present activity, expansion potential , current based aircraft , future development intentions and facilities available to the public. Annual operations per based aircraft and airport capacity will be estimated at the significant area airports. The type of service provided at each airport will be reported. Output: Area airport characteristics reported in text. Task 1 .6 Identify Area Registered Aircraft Description • FAA aircraft registration data will be assembled and summarized. Aircraft with gross weights greater than 8,000 pounds will be identified by owner and aircraft type and will be listed in the report text. Special attention will be given to aircraft registered in the area, where they are based, and the number of annual operations performed. Output : Quantification of area aircraft and activity by type of aircraft. 1 Task 1 .7 Assemble Weather Data Description: W►nd velocity data from all available relevant sources will be collected, reviewed and compared to determine which is most applicable to a new airport site. Output: Windrose. Task 1 .8 Prepare Basic Reference Map Description- A reduced USGS map mosaic will be prepared to identify the future land use planning and existing airspace. This basic map will be utilized throughout the study to identify basic siting area, local boundaries, land uses , transportation corridors and topography. Output : Reference map. Task 1 .9 Prepare Inventory Working Pacer Description• Combining the data and conclusions drawn from the previous efforts , prepare a working paper that provides a detailed overview of the background information compiled and the parameters to be used to establish boundaries of the area in which an airport could be feasibly located to adequately serve the needs of the Apache Junction area. Output: Background information and identification of the airport siting area criteria. Task 1 . 10 Prepare Public Information Brochure Description : Organize basic information and community data and develop a narrative and graphical presentation ►n the form of a simple brochure explaining the purpose, organization, work efforts , and goals of the airport master plan. The brochure will be one color ink on colored paper, 8ix11 inches, printed on both sides , tri-folded. Output: 2000 copies of a Public Information Brochure. Task 1 .11 Prepare Planning Advisory Committee Workbooks Description: Three-ring notebooks will be prepared with the Airport Master Plan cover, tabs for the primary master plan elements and meeting minutes and notes. This notebook will be used by planning advisory committee members to organize the working papers and other information developed during the course of the study. Output: 25 copies of the Planning Advisory Committee Workbooks. K ELEMENT 2 - FORECASTS Task 2. 1 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting {Y Description: Schedule and conduct a meeting of the Planning 0- Advisory Committee to review and evaluate the inventory working paper. This meeting will also be used to discuss the efforts that will be ; undertaken during the next phase of the study especially the identi- fication of an airport site area boundary. Output: Coordination and direction for continuing study efforts. f<< Task 2.2 Determine Airport Site Area Description: Utilizing information developed in Element 1 and the overview provided by the planning advisory committee , establish boundaries based on population centers , location of industry, pertinent existing area-wide planning and access. This area will be used to t identify the general limits of a search area that appears to be feasible for locating an airport for maximum present and future benefit to 5 Adak the area. Output: Airport site area boundary. Task 2.3 Develop Airport Activity Forecasts Description: The total Apache Junction area aircraft operation's forecasts for each phase of the study period will be compared to the airport system capacity outlined in the Regional , State and Federal _ System Plans. The deficit capacity by phase will be checked and related to general design phasing requirements for a new airport . Operations forecasts will be refined and expanded from data developed in Element 1 and forecasts will be prepared to include the following : - Annual and peak hour aircraft operations - Based aircraft - Aircraft mix - Local and itinerant split - Annual Instrument Approaches - Annual and peak hour enplaned passengers - Annual enplaned airmail and cargo volumes Output: New Airport Activity Forecasts Task 2.4 Establish Air ort Re uirements Description: Utilizing the data developed from the previous tasks in this section perform a general demand/capacity analysis where necessary to verify the general airport requirements that will be necessary to meet projected demand so that it can be utilized as criteria for establishing basic factors in the search for an adequate site for the ultimate development of the airport. Output: Airport Requirements and Site Criteria. Task 2.5 Prepare Forecasts Working Paper Description• Combining the data and conclusions drawn from the previous efforts, prepare a brief working paper that establishes and describes that criteria that will be used in the site selection process. Output : Forecasts Working Paper. ELEMENT 3 - PRELIMINARY SITE ANALYSIS • ..�. Task 3. 1 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting. Description: Schedule and conduct a meeting with representatives of the Planning Advisory Committee to review and evaluate the forecasts working paper. This meeting will also be used to schedule the public information meeting and to outline the activities of upcoming work efforts. Output : Coordination and direction for continuing study efforts. Task 3.2 Conduct Public Information Meeting Description : Schedule and organize an initial public information meeting to acquaint the public with the purpose and organization of this study. The primary elements to be covered in this meeting will be to familiarize the public with the study format , ways in which the public may become involved in the study, the findings to date , the activities of the consultant 's prior to the next meeting , open discussion and a back- ground slide presentation relating to general aviation airport development. �► Output: Public Information Meeting and Summary Memorandum. Task 3.3 Perform Overlay Analysis Description: This initial process will begin with the base map prepared in Task 1 .8. A series of base map overlays will be prepared which will "black out ," areas of land which are least suitable for airport development. The following criteria (each factor represents an overlay) will be utilized in the overlay procedure: 1. Urban Development. Developed and proposed commercial , industrial , and residential areas will be identified and eliminated from further consideration. 2. Historic and Archaeological . Areas containing known sites will be identified and eliminated from consideration. 3. Areas of Unusual Scenic Beauty. These areas , as identified by local sources, will be eliminated from consideration. 4. . Existing Airport Airspace. Standard airspace configurations will be identified for each area airport. Existing smaller airports for which a low probability for continued operation has been identified will not be entirely eliminated from consideration. A comprehensive evaluation of area airport traffic • d flow compatibility is not possible with two-dimensional graphics, however. Therefore, only general limitations to a new site will be identified in the elimination procedure and the airspace analysis will be performed as a separate work element. 5. Potential Airspace Obstructions. Communication towers , smoke stacks, and power transmission lines will be identified by symbol to the readily apparent as site limitations. 6. Excess Slope. Areas of terrain with slopes greater than 2% will be eliminated. It is quite possible that the selected site may p infringe on areas with slopes greater than 2% but not with the major portions of the runways. 7. Flood Hazard. Areas subject to 100-year flood probability will be eliminated as indicated by current Federal Flood Insurance Administration maps. 8. Absence of Water Supply Source. Areas without economically feasible groundwater supply , surface water or an adjacent local system will be eliminated. 9. Sanitary Landfills. Locations will be identified. Output: Overlays prepared for base map to graphically identify each major factor. Task 3.4 Identify Potential Airport Sites Description• From Task 3.4 the overlays will be combined into a composite to readily identify areas which may be suitable for airport development. Output: Overlay composite and identification of potential sites. Task 3.5 Engineering Site Rating Analysis Description: All sites identified in Task 3.4 will be evaluated for development costs and other factors including drainage, site clearing , general soil characteristics , obstruction removal , general topography , road relocation, and structure relocation. Consideration will be given to the probability of adjacent compatible urban development. Output: Potential sites will be related to each other in matrix format. Task 3.6 Environmental Site Rating Analysis Description: Each airport site identified in previous tasks will be evaluated in a general sense for its relationship to environmental factors . These factors will include but will not be limited to: ... - Social Considerations - Public Acceptance - Land Use Compatibility - Prime Farm Land - Property Value _ - Tax Base - - Relocation Needs and Impacts - Community Disruption Factors Influence on Future Area Development Output: A general environmental rating for all potential sites. Task 3.7 Prepare Selection of Candidate Sites Working Paper Description- Combining the data and conclusions drawn from the previous efforts , prepare a working paper that provides a detailed overview of the data and evaluations utilized to examine potential sites and eliminate those with the least potential for feasibility. "`. Output: Selection of Candidate Sites. Task 3.8 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Description- Schedule and conduct a meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee to review and evaluate the candidate site selection working paper. This meeting will also be used to discuss the efforts that will be undertaken during the next phase of the study. Output: Coordination and direction for continuing study efforts. Task 3.9 Determine Land Ownership Description- Once the candidate site(s) have been selected, apply the airport requirements data pertaining to land area and site configuration to identify the general location and extent of each proposed site. Obtain through local or county records the number, size and ownership of each parcel of land included in the site property boundaries, and depict this information on site layouts prepared in later tasks. Output: Identification of land ownership at candidate sites. lx_ ELEMENT 4 - REFINED SITE ANALYSIS } Task 4. 1 Evaluate Airspace Considerations Description: Compare the airport airspace needs for each candidate site to the area needs and system. As a part of this procedure identify areas where airspace may be saturated or restricted as a result of the location of a new airport. Where airspace conflicts result from the development of a new airport , evaluate and identify the level or degree of conflict and the delays that might result. tl Output: Airspace analysis on each candidate site. {i n [ }. Task 4.2 Refine Site Requirements tx Description: Utilizing the basic forecast data on aeronautical activity as well as FAA design standards and the facility requirements , determine the overall requirements of the airport to be used in evaluating potential sites. These requirements will include but not be limited to the runway length and orientation, general airfield layout and minimum �► land area required to accommodate a facility of the size indicated by the forecasts. Output: Airport Site Requirements. Task 4.3 Estimate Development Costs Description: Quantities will be estimated , unit costs will be established for purposes of comparison and the total development cost at each site will be estimated. Costs of major improvement items will be reported. Output : Ultimate development costs for each of the candidate sites. Task 4.4 Prepare General Site Layouts Description• For each of the candidate sites , a general airport layout sketch will be prepared (8 " X 11") indicating runway and taxiing configuration, access road requirements, general terminal area location , /011 and major existing topographical features. Wind coverage at each site will be computed and indicated on each sketch. Output: General site layout sketch for each of the candidate sites. • Task 4.5 Prepare Aircraft Noise Contours Description: Utilizing the airport activity and fleet mix forecasts developed for the new airport , prepare aircraft noise contours for each candidate site. The contours will be developed using the Day-Night Sound Level (Ldn) metric which is a cumulative measure with a penalty for night time operations. These contours will be prepared utilizing a standard hand calculated methodology presented to Report No. FAA-AS-75-1 "Developing Noise Exposure Contours for General Aviation Airports" by Bolt , Beranek, and Newman, Inc. The contours will be depicted on the site layouts prepared in previous tasks. Output: Aircraft noise contours for each candidate site. ELEMENT 5 - SITE SELECTION p Task 5. 1 Conduct FAA Site Inspection Description: Following discussion of the characteristics of each of the candidate sites, FAA representatives will be invited to inspect each site with representatives of the Planning Advisory Committee and the Consultants. Output: FAA familiarization with each potential site prior to Public Information Meeting Number 2. Task 5.2 Prepare Candidate Sites Working Paper Description. Combining the data and conclusions drawn from the previous efforts, prepare a working paper that provides a detailed overview of the data and evaluations utilized to examine the candidate sites. This data will be organized in such a way that the advantages and disadvantages of each candidate site can be easily identified and understood. Mt Output • Evaluation of Candidate Sites. Task 5.3 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Description: Schedule and conduct a meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee to review and evaluate data developed about each candidate site. This meeting will be used to discuss the relative merits of each candidate site as well as the signif►cant negative factors involved, and to outline the activities involved in the follow-up effort of recommending a site or sites in preferential order. Output: Coordination and direction for continuing study efforts. Task 5.4 Conduct Public Information Meeting Description: Schedule and organize a public information meeting to acquaint the public with the analyses and findings from study efforts to determine the candidate sites for the airport. The primary elements to be covered in the meeting are the selection of the sites themselves , the process of elimination and the procedures to be used in further eliminating the sites, recommending the remaining sites in preferential order, and open discussion, This meeting will require several graphic aids and formal preparation to produce. Output: Public Information Meeting. Task 5.5 Determine Recommended Site Description: Based upon the conclusions drawn from both the refined ,.. site analysis and from the public information meeting discussing these sites prepare adequate background rationale and information to support the recommendation of a single site for a new airport. Coordinate this selection with a final discussion between cognizant community officials and interested parties as well as the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration. Output : Selection of a Preferred Site. Task 5.6 Assemble Environmental Assessment Document Description . Once the selection of a preferred site has been made the data obtained in previous efforts will be compiled and organized into a draft environmental assessment document for distribution. This effort will include the development of detailed assessment data and will comply with FAA Order 1050. 1C and 5050.4 as well as responding to any remaining community require-ents that might become necessary as a result of public concern or controversy. Twenty (20) copies of the Draft Assessment will be prepared. Output: Twenty (20) copies of Draft Environmental Assessment Document. Task 5.7 Conduct Public Hearing on Site Selection Description: A duly advertised, formal public hearing will be held at an appropriate tine and location upon the availability of a complete draft of the Environmental Assessment Document. The hearing will be conducted to provide an overview of the site selection process and the environmental , social and economical factors significant to the recommended airport sites , and to allow for interested and affected citizens to make comments and express opinions on the process and/or in favor of or in opposition to the recommended sites. The consultant will prepare the appropriate graphic aids needed to provide the overview and will organize and conduct the hearing. The hearing will be preceded by an informal information meeting to answer general questions about the study and its results to date. Output: Forr-al Public Hearing and Information Meeting. .•. Task 5.8 Prepare Final Environmental Assessment Document Description: Co-ments made at the public hearing as contained on the verbatim transcript , as well as those received in writing from A-95 review agencies , ether agencies and citizens who submit them within 30 days after the Public Hearing will be evaluated. Appropriate written response in the form of answers to questions , correction of errors or omissions, additional data or referral will be prepared for attachment • to the related comment source document. Utilizing the information obtained above, reorganize and expand the draft environmental assessment document to reflect and include the material and format required under FAA Order 1050. 1C "Policies and Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts" especially Appendix 6 "Instructions for Processing Airport Development Actions Affecting the Environment." Upon completion of the revisions and attachments print fifty (50) copies of the document for review distribution. Output: Fifty (50) copies of Final Environmental Assessment Document. i ELEMENT 6 - PLANS AND REPORTS Task 6. 1 Refine Development Schedule �► Description • A land acquisition and development program will be recommended based on forecast activity. Development will be reported by phase (0-5 year, 6-10 year, 11-20 year) , based on activity, avail- ability and estimated future funding resources. Special attention will be given to development phas►ng for the initial development of the airport. Improvements recommended during each phase will be indicated, in detail , on 8z"X11" drawings in the text. Output: Development Schedule and supporting narrative and graphics. Task 6.2 Refine Cost Estimates Description: Land and improvement costs will be verified for each development phase based upon local current unit construction prices and reported comparable land sale prices. No appriasals will be performed by the Consultant. Quantities and unit costs will be estimated for each development item. The cost estimates will be adequate for project budgeting. Output: Development of Cost Estimates. Task 6. 3 Develop Financial Plan Description: A thorough review of fund source alternatives will be performed at the outset of this task and listed on the report text. The availability of federal grants , State grants , revenue bonds , county road funds, private financing of terminal area improvement and estimated airport revenues will be considered separately and in combination. Application of Federal grant funds other than FAA will be considered. Output: Detailed Financial Plan. Task 6.4 Economic Feasibility Evaluation Description: Economic benefits resulting from development of the new airport will be identified and quantified to the extent possible. Potential increased tax revenues to adjacent communities , improved safety , added employment and direct and indirect business expansion will be related to project development costs , operation and maintenance costs , and . - „ airport revenues. Particular attention will be given to the benefits to the area immediately affected by airport development. Output: Economic Feasibility Evaluation. i Task 6.5 Prepare Airport Layout Plans Description: Prepare appropriate drawings associated with an airport layout plan set meeting FAA requirements. This set of plans Aim. will be prepared on 24"X36" mylar reproducible film which will become the property of the City of Apache Junction. The airport layout plan { set will include the drawings outlined and described below: (1) Airport Layout Plan !!1 The airport layout plan will be drawn to a scale of 1" = 300' d ` or 1" = 400' and will include the layout of the existing and ultimate l development of the airport. This will include, but will not be limited to, the runway configuration , taxiways , aprons, terminal facilities , hangars, automobile parking and access and the physical boundaries of the airport. The windrose analysis , basic runway data tables , facility legend and building identification table will also be included on this drawing. 1 t (2) Airport Airspace Drawing 4 I The airport airspace drawing will include a plan view of all FAR Part 77 surfaces based on ultimate runway lengths and approaches , and profile views of ultimate approaches. The plan view will be drawn at a scale of 1" = 2000' and the profiles will be drawn at a scale of i 1" = 2000' and the profiles will be drawn at a scale of 1" = 1000' 1 horizontal and 1" = 100' vertical . The background maps for the airspace i drawing will be U.S.G.S. Topography maps. (3) Approach and Clear Zone Drawing Large scale approach and clear zone drawings will be made for i each end of each runway. The drawing will consist of 1" = 100' horizontal I and 1" = 20' vertical plan and profile views of the inner portions of the runway approaches. Topography and land features will be included by simplified mapping. (4) Terminal Area Drawing 1 The development of the terminal area plan will evolve from the 1 airport layout plan drawing and the airport land use drawing. The terminal i area plan will include the primary operation's area of the airport and will be drawn at a scale of 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' with appropriate topographic contours. (5) Airport Land Use Drawing A comprehensive "on airport" land use plan will be developed. The drawing will also evolve from the airport layout plan and will be the i same scale, but will reflect only pertinent dimensional criteria , boundaries , i physical facilities and land uses. The land uses for all land area within i the airport boundary will be depicted with symbols. The areas set aside for ; 1 1 each type of use will be defined by both appropriate symbol and dimensions to make adherence to these uses easier to accomplish. Output : Seven (7) sets of prints and the original mylar drawings of the Airport Layout Plan Set. Task 6.6 Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Description: At an appropriate time near the completion of this phase of the study conduct the final planning advisory committee meeting to discuss concluding requirements and any special needs for the development of the final master plan report. This meeting will also be used to outline plans for implementation of the master plan and to set the first phases of implementation into motion, including application for inclusion into the National Airport System Plan (NASP) and application procedures for State and Federal grant participation in land acquisition and/or construction. Output: Direction for Preparing Master Plan Report. 1 Task 6.7 Prepare Master Plan Report Description: Utilizing appropriate materials developed as a result of all other Study Elements, prepare a technical report which describes the Airport Master Plan. This document will incorporate in sufficient 1 -! detail all of the data and recommendations developed throughout the entire Study effort. it will be adequately inclusive and provide approximate depth to insure that all technical elements of the plan process are clearly identified as to their methodology, data content , and pertinent conclusions. It will describe the various plan alternatives , both for the Airport and the Environs Area, that were considered in achieving recommendations , and will indicate the reasons for selecting I those alternatives which prove to be most desirable. In addition to the written text necessary to clarify the Plan, this technical report will also include such graphic depictions, charts , tables, and other presentation formats as may be required to permit a detailed evaluation of the report contents. : r 1 1 1 11 EXHIBIT B Weft PROJECT SCHEDULE ELEMENT DAYS 1 - INVENTORY 30 - 45 2 - FORECASTS 45 - 60 3 - PRELIMINARY SITE ANALYSIS 45 - 60 4 - REFINED SITE ANALYSIS 45 - 60 5 - SITE SELECTION 60 - 75 6 - PLANS AND REPORTS 45 - 60 TOTAL PROJECT TIME FRAME 9 Months - 12 Months The time frames outlined above include the coordination procedures discussed in Exhibit A - Scope of Services. Several factors such as A-95, Environmental Notification and comment periods can extend beyond the time frame shown above, however several work tasks are overlapping and will be accomplished somewhat out of the sequence in which they are outlined. Every effort will be made to accomplish work tasks under each element in less time than that shown above; however, experience with this type of project indicates that these time frames do represent average periods required to adequately perform the work. Adak 1 .—..n_.-•T-. «. ... ... .,,—......'»»........ _ _ _ _ EXHIBIT C COST SU1v11`?A R Y Ci°Qge 0 _ ..n:.a..,{c�...;ass,....._..,,...,.v..1..a...•..`�.."'�T.i..�....,:.u'�.�„es.u�.'• _�.'."�"t'. 'u 5�::'�.c:. ___—uti .�a.i«�.:w...--w3+.:2.�3..__. -- _._.,....,... TASK NUMBER PROJECT AIRPORT TECIJIC/AN CLERICAL TOTAL Ca5 TITLE /1/1ANA GER PLAN//IER EXPENSES BY TA S/C z,., //RS/COST lI PS/GUST ///75/COST //RS/COST 3!VN1' 1 CA .B bV,'-9 I CA B WN! CA 8 t+1i'1 GA I.I flack round 24/84o - 2:1 F - - - / / ' 2/23 /00 - / 7 3/ 1.2 Land Use -' -- /6/5/2 - - - 2/23 — 25 - 56,o 13 Environmenl`a) - «- - / ,/43o - - - 2/22 - 50o /00 2 + 1.4 Socioeconomic - - /6/5/2 - - 2/23 - 25 560 1.5 Eisl Arports 8/23o 24/84o - -- - - ... 16 Red is't d Ai rcmff - - - 8/240 - _... i_' - - - 2 4 0 L7 1 rcolrbcr Data - _ - 8/240 - 8//52 - - - 25 4 1 7 18 Re I'e n-ncc Map ._ - i 8/240 - /6/304 - - - 2 5 56 9 1.9 Working Raper 4//40 8/280 - 24/72o - /6/304 2/23 4/44 - /25 /G 3 6 I io Inf'ormo}ion 8ro,ch - 8/28o - -- -- /6/3o - 2/22 - 35o 95G I.11 PAC Workbooks -- -- - - f3/l52 - - 300 452 FITMENT I - TOTAL 3Q//z6o 4o/i400 50792 6i1/492o — 64//2'6 8/52 8/88 200 /825 9,7 9 3 2.1 PAC Mec)-in3 8/2e0 24/640 - - - 8/i52 _ - - 50 Soo / 8 22 2.2 Ck ermrnc S,cArm 4//4o 6/28o - 144'230 - - - - - _ 9 O O ' 2.3 Fortcas-i'S - 8/280 - 32/96o . - - - 4/44 - - / 2 8 4 2,4 FacJ))1, Rein rmrn - : - 16/560 - 24/72o - - - -- - - / 2 SO 2,5 Worki r Paper_ 8/2so 8/280 __ 24/720 - /6/3o4. - 4/41. 50 /25 / 8 0 3 ELEMENT 2-TOTALS 20/700 64/2zdo — q(-,/?.RRi) — . 9.Al.1ct — Rasta inn /.._ o� , n o a EX/t-88/T C - COST SUMMARY (Page 2) . .:x,..,,.x.... :_,.:.t. ..., , ..,,...„....4,=7:...urzazw g"..wa.,A .Atsa:,1....uei =-3at .Z31=2ZEMICCZ=V=3M711" 11111M11.12GrIP - TASK NUMBER PROJECT AIRPORT TECHNIC/AN CLERICAL TOTAL CasT TITLE MANAGER PLANNER EXPENSES BY TASK NRS/COST /IRS/c05T // 3JCOST NRS/COST BWIv1 CA BWM CA BWM CA BWM CA 8WM CA 3.1 PAC Mcclirn 8/280 /6/560 - _ 8/is2 -- 50 50o / 5 4 2 3 2 PIM Mee}ins 8/280 8/280 -- - . - - 2/22 5o 50 682 3.3 Over143 Analis - - - _ 40/l200 - 32/608 - -- 75 / 88 3 3.4 Idenfi{ g}enM 511 5/280 4//40 --- ---- - - — — - - 4 2 0 3.5 Ensr' $,}c R:1 )ng _ - /6/5/2 - -- 4/ 76 2/22 50 - 729 3.6 Env,ron.Sikk Rafin.5 - -- — /6/480 -- 4176 2/22 - 500 / 0 78 .7 Working PQper 4//40 8/250 -24/720 /6/304 4/44 - /25 / 6 /3 3.8 PAC Meeting ... 8/280 /6/560 _ . — 8/i52 - 50 50o / 54 2 3 9 Carr Ownership -' - /6/5i2 24/504 /00 ELEMENT 3 - TOTAL5 36/i26o 52//82o j 32/1024 8o/Z400 24/504. 72//368 : IO///0 300 / 750 /0, 6 2 8 41 Evalu4k Airspace. - 4//40 - /6/480 - 8/152 _ — 7 72 _ 4/l40 - 40/lzo0 / 3 4 0 ,�.2 S,}e .Ratuir�mcn�s — _ _ ,-1.3 Lkyelopmen} Coss .7"- - - - 1(o/5/2 04/72o - 2/22 50 - / 3 27 I.4 Sitc Lasouis __ `" "' — Z4/72o - 32/608 --- -- -- /308 i 5 Noise. Contours __ _- _ - 24/720 - 8//52 4/44 - /50 /0 6 6 ELEMENT 4-ToTA1-5 - _8/080 1 /6/5/2 /28/3840 48/9/2 2/23 6/66 50 /50 5,833 I - EX/-//B/ T. C - COST SUMMARY (Poge 3 l i..... .ur... •+till ,2•_w:.R1LR-LT.,,,,, ....4-m...„4.- ....,...„,..i..,,,,iA,,T,.•.:,,,f r,!...w..m.,.t ,„„.. E1.., .__+�41. 3224.4+3.1..�•.4.Ci.... A.0 r.z _-1-. rn Rd .. .• TASk NUMBER PROJECT AIRPORT TECHNICIAN CLERICAL TOTAL t TITLE MANAGER PLANNER EXPENSES BY TA; HRS/cosy HRs/cast h/k'S/COST Hies/east BW/'1 cA ,8W`? CA 8WM CA BWM CA BWM CA 5.I Sr}c Inspection 8/Z60 8/280 — -- _ --- -- 50 500 / / / 5 2 Working F�per 4//4-0 8/280 — 24/720 — /6/3o4 — 41 44 - /25 / ( / 53 PAC Mectinol 8/Z8o /6/5F_,0 — — -- 8//54 0/23 — 50 5,00 /5 6 z 15.4 PIM Meciinn 8/280 8/28o _ — /, 2f�2 Q 70� 5.5 Ocdcrrninc Si}e. 8/280 4//40 -- -- _ — 4 00 5 6 Draft Environmcrr}Zal — /6/560 6¢//340 — <V, ^': /2//32 — 450 .35 / 8 51 Rubhc Ncarmg 8/E80 /6/5(f'o — /6/480 — 8/152 — 2/2Z 50 900 2 444 58 Fnal.Erwlrw wined-III 8/2,80 `- 24/7Z0 -_--_ 8//52 4/44 — 600 1 79- 6' y--_ — - . . 1.LEMENT 5- TOTALS 44/154o 84/2940 -- 1 /281384o -- 64/i216 4/46 24/264- 200 3/ZS /3,/ 7 s•I Lcrcbpmcn-E SchcdulG. y 4/140 — 24/7Z0 — — — .-- — — 86c 2 Co. -F EstirT 4c$ — 4-//4 0 /6/5/2 /6/480 — 2/23 4/4 4 5 o — / 2 4 <o 3 Fin4nci4) P>an -- ¢//40 — /6/480 — — — 8/ 88 -- -- 70 G.4 Economic. Fctnbih}tj 4//40 — /6/480 -- — — —' 62l !,.5 Airpor}_Lnyoul Pions — 8/260 32/✓60 - -- /60/3040 — — — /7-5 _4 4,5 �•6 PAC Ma:�irx3 8/280 /6/5eO — — 8//52 -- 2/22 ,�j0 500 /5(v 4 7 Master Plan le r} 8/230 8/280 -- 40�/200 — 24/456 — 24/244 — /550 4O3( ELEM T 6- TOTALS ,242560 48/16M0 /4/512 /4414320 — 192/3448 2/23 38/448 /00 2225 /3,48 I nr),. 1r r-r rn-ra 1 c /52/5320 296//0.360 /70~4 1440/i,2oe 24/5o 4(,4/881G 26/276 94/�".._ 950 9700 6O,0C • rV ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS DIVISION 205 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 PROJECT APPLICATION (For State Aid for Development of Public Airports) • Airport Apache Junction - New Date AFE No. PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION The City of Apache Junction ,hereinafter called the"SPONSOR"hereby makes application to the State of Arizona,Department of Transportation hereinafter called the "STATE," for a grant of State funds for the purpose of aiding in financing a project, hereinafter called the 'PROJECT"for the improvement of the Airport, hereinafter called the"AIRPORT, located at Apache Junction in the State of Arizona. It is proposed that the PROJECT will commence on or about July 1 , 1 980 and will consist of the following described airport improvements,alias shown on the approved Airport Layout Plan(ALP) and in the attached outline of construction methods which are made a part hereof. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT Airport Master Plan and Site Selection Study for Apache Junction, Arizona (See attached Exhibit A) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED CGSTS OF THE PROJECT Ululated Federal Estimated Sponzar's Ertlmrted Slate ITEM Tate Esslsllmated Share d Coat Share d Cot Share of Coat Ca Amount Amount Amount 1 Land Costs • 2. Construction Costs • 3 Engineering and Supervision Costs $60,000 -0- $6 ,000 $54,000 4 Administrative Costs 'alkk 5. Contingencies 6. Total All Estimated Project Costs $60,000 -0- $6,000 $54,000 PART II — REPRESENTATIONS The SPONSOR hereby represents and certifies as follows' 1. The SPONSOR has the legal power and authority (1)to do all things necessary in order to undertake and carry out the PROJECT,(2)to accept,receive and disburse grants of funds from the STATE in aid o1 the PROJECT,(3)to carry out all the provisions of PART ill of this Project Application. tQoe•oeoa R3/70 J — _ _1 2. The SPONSOR now has on deposit or is in a position to secure S 6 .000 .or an equivalent amount represented by SPONSOR's proposed labor and equipment costs for use in defraying SPONSOR's share of the costs of the PROJECT.The present status of these funds Is as follows' i 3. The SPONSOR possesses legal authority to apply for the grant and that a resolution motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the SPONSOR's governing body authorizing the filing of the application,including all understandings and assurances contained therein and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the SPONSOR to act in connection with this application and to provide such additional information as may be required The SPONSOR hereby designates NAME TITLE to receive payments representing the STATE's share of PROJECT cost. ADDRESS PART HI -SPONSOR'S ASSURANCES The SPONSOR hereby covenants and agrees with the STATE as follows' 1 That these covenants shall become effective upon execution of an Intergovernmental Agreement for the PROJECT or any portion thereof,made by the STATE and shall constitute a part of the Intergovernmental Agreement thus formed aria shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of the facilities developed under the PROJECT,but in any event not to exceed twenty(20)years from date of said execution of the Intergovernmental Agreement. 2. To operate the AIRPORT as such for the use and benefit of the public and to keep the AIRPORT open to all types kinds and classes of aeronautical use without discrimination between such types kinds ano classes provided that the SPONSOR shall establish such fair ecuai anc nonoiscriminatory conditions to Pe met by all users of the AIRPORT as may be necessary for the sate aria efficient operation of the AIRPORT,and provide further that the SPONSOR may prohibit any given type kind or ciass of aeronautical use of the AIRPORT if such use would create unsafe conditions interfere witn normal operation of aircraft,or cause damages or lead to the deterioration of the runway or other .4116k AIRPORT facilities 3. To suitably operate and maintain the AIRPORT and all facilities thereon or connected therewith which are necessary for AIRPORT purposes,and to prohibit any activity thereon which would interfere with its use for aeronautical purposes aro to operate essential fanrities including night lighting systems when installed in such manner as to assure their availability to all uses of the AIRPORT provided that nothing contained trerein snail be construed to rec:.ire that the AIRPORT be operated and maintained for aeronautical uses during temporary periods when snow flood or other climatic conditions interfere substantially with such operation and maintenance. 4 To refrain from entering into any transaction which would operate to deprive the SPONSOR of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the covenants made herein unless by such transaction the obligation to perform all such covenants is ass:.med by anotner public agency eiigio.e to assume such obligations and having the power authority aria financial resources to carry out such obligations ano if an arrangement is mace for management or operation of the AIRPORT by an agency or person other than the SPONSOR or any employee of the SPONSOR,the SPONSOR will reserve suhlcient powers and authority to insure that the AIRPORT will be operated and maintained in accordance with these covenants 5. To maintain a current Airport Layout Plan(ALPI of the AIRPORT having the approval of the STATE which shows building areas and landing areas indicating present and future proposed development.to conform to the ALP in making any future improvements or changes at the AIRPORT,and to furnish Ine STATE a current ALP of the AIRPORT and such information as is necessary to keep the ALP current. 6. The SPONSOR hereby assures that it is the Owner,or Lessee.of the properly or properties on which the AIRPORT is located and that the lease,if any,guarantees that the SPONSOR has full control of the use of the property for a period of not less than twenty(20)years from the date of the Agreement 7. That it will give the STATE through any,uthorized representative access to and the right to examine all records books,papers,or documents relating to the grant 8. The SPONSOR also assures that it will furnish to the STATE each month a current fisting of all aircraft based on the AIRPORT 9. The SPONSOR shall maintain accurate records of all labor,equipment and materials used in this PROJECT The PROJECT costs shall be subject to audit by the STATE. • SIGNATURE OF SPONSOR'S REPRESENTATIVE TIRE OF REPRESENTATIVE APPROVAL DATE OF BOARD APPROVAL AERONAUTICS DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE APACHE JUNCTION AIRPORT 1) Resolution for filing of Application for funds. (5) 2) Project Application - signature of City Manager (41Li. a.tc _) 3) Resolution for entering into contract with Buell Winter Mousel & Associates 4) Contracts between the City of Apache Junction and Buell Winter Mousel and Associates. Signature of: 1) City Manager 2) City Clerk 3) City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # \\ MEETING OF /� `° MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : \A\ ys / COUNCILMAN SHANKS V COUNCILMAN 1LJR.GFSS COUNCILMAN FIDSON cOUNC I LMAN H I I L _ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO I V / MAYOR SEEMAN I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ITEM NO, 11 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO , 80-18 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 80-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, 'ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE A PROJECT APPLICATION FOR STATE AID IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000 TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTION STUDY; AND FURTHER DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACT AS THE OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE IN CONNECTION WITH SAID APPLICATION, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED , FOR APPROVAL fi ITEM NO, 11 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO , 80-18 , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO, 80-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE_ A PROJECT APPLICATION FOR STATE AID IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000 TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTION STUDY, AND FURTHER DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACT AS THE OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE IN CONNECTION WITH SAID APPLICATION, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED, FOR DENIAL ACyF✓ O� PQ liyC, U ;! b..$.0r d z __,—_4„.1..„-:__-y... 4R,Z°NP V iti 404pache o9unction May 14, 1980 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU- Ray Lee, City Manager QA%}FROM: Richard W. Broman, Director of Public Works SUBJECT. Airport Study ... Attached are resolutions to authorize the City Manager to file an application for state aid and to approve consulting services for an airport study. This department has reviewed the attachments with the members of the Airport Committee and the City Attorney and recommends approval accordingly. RWB: sw /a.V/e°, —.� APPROVED OH / ITEM No. ---...../ ....—.. ....- �D f':;SLIO NEA '4iJ N'W BUSINESS =E �e?—'` -- ,r..__- REPORTS CITY MANAGER P�� INFO/ 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 RESOLUTION NO. 80-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND BUELL WINTER MOUSEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AN AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTION STUDY FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. WHEREAS, this Council has received the written recommendation of the Apache Junction Airport Committee to approve the planning services contract employing Buell Winter Mousel & Associates, Inc. for the purpose of the preparation of an Airport Master Plan and Site Selection Study for Apache Junction, Arizona; and WHEREAS, the Study shall be prepared at a cost of $60,000 pursuant to the planning services contract; and WHEREAS, the maximum cost to the City shall not exceed $6,000, with the remaining $54,000 proposed to be funded by Arizona Department of Trans- portation Grant; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to complete an Airport Master Plan and Site Selection Study for the City of Apache Junction: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the planning services contract employing Buell Winter Mousel & Associates, Inc. and Coffman Associates, Inc. as consultants for the preparation of an Airport Master Plan and Site selection study for the City of Apache Junction be and is hereby approved, providing the maximum City cost shall not exceed $6,000; and BE IT FURHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona be and is authorized, empowered and directed to execute said contract providing the City Manager has received to his satisfaction written confirmation of Arizona Department of Transportation funding r f the balance of the cost of the contract. PASSED this day of 1980 by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. Mayor ... ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: C . LAW OFFICES MARTINEZ, CURTIS, GOODWIN & KARASEII 1402 FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BUILDING 3003 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE MICHAEL A CURTIS PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85012 A_ JAY M. MARTINEZ TELEPHONE (602) 248 0372 SUSAN D GOODWIN DAVID K KARASEK REFER TO FILE NO 244-3 OF COUNSEL JOHN C JENNINGS May 15, 1980 Mr. Richard Broman Director of Public Works Post Office Box K Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Re: Proposed Planning Services Contracts Dear Mr. Broman: We have reviewed the Proposed Planning Services Contract with Buell, Winter, Mousel & Associates, Inc. and will approve said contract as to form. With respect to the proposed resolution, the City Code provides that resolutions (as well as contracts ) must be approved as to form by the City Attorney. Please add a signature line for approved as to form by the City Attorney on the resolution. Sincerely, Susan D. Goodwin SDG/js MAY 1 6 1880 t ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS DIVISION 205 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 PROJECT APPLICATION (For State Aid for Development of Public Airports) Airport Apache Junction - New Date AFE No PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION The City of Apache Junction hereinafter called the 'SPONSOR,"hereby makes application to the State of Arizona.Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the "STATE," for a grant of State funds for the purpose of aiding in financing a project, hereinafter called the 'PROJECT for the improvement of the Airport, hereinafter called the"AIRPORT, located at Apache Junction in the State of Arizona. It is proposed that the PROJECT will commence on or about July 1 , 1 980 and will consist of the following described airport improvements all as shown on the approved Airport Layout Plan(ALP) and in the attached outline of construction methods which are made a part hereof DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT Airport Master Plan and Site Selection Study for Apache Junction, Arizona (See attached Exhibit A) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS OF THE PROJECT Estimated Federal Estimated Sponsors Estimated Stale ITEM Total CEstimated Share of Cost Shari at Cost Share of Cost st Amount Amount Amount 1 Land Costs 2 Construction Costs 3 Engineering and Supervision Costs $60,000 -0- $6,000 $54,000 4 Administrative Costs 5. Contingencies 6. Total All Estimated Project Costs $60,000 -0- $6,000 $54,000 PART II — REPRESENTATIONS The SPONSOR hereby represents and certifies as follows 1 The SPONSOR has the legal power and authority (1)to do all things necessary in order to undertake and carry out the PROJECT,(2)to accept,receive and disburse grants of funds from the STATE in aid of the PROJECT,(3)to carry out all the provisions of PART III of this Project Application t.on 0801 R3/7e 2. The SPONSOR now has on deposit or is in a position to secure$ 6,000 ,or an equivalent amount represented by SPONSOR's proposed labor end equipment costs,for use in defraying SPONSOR's share of the costs of the PROJECT The present status of these funds Is as follows. 3. The SPONSOR possesses legal authority to apply for the grant and that a resolution motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the SPONSOR's governing body,authorizing the filing of the application including all understandings and assurances contained therein,and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the SPONSOR to act in connection with this application and to provide such additional information as may be required • The SPONSOR hereby designates NAME TITLE to receive payments representing the STATE's share of PROJECT cost. ADDRESS PART III -SPONSOR'S ASSURANCES The SPONSOR hereby covenants and agrees with the STATE as follows 1 That these covenants shall become effective upon execution of an Intergovernmental Agreement for the PROJECT or any portion thereof,made by the STATE and shall constitute a part of the Intergovernmental Agreement thus formed and shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of the facilities developed under the PROJECT,but in any event not to exceed twenty(20)years from date of said execution of the Intergovernmental Agreement 2. To operate the AIRPORT as such for the use and benefit of the public,and to keep the AIRPORT open to all types,kinds and classes of aeronautical use without discrimination between such types,kinds and classes,provided that the SPONSOR shall establish such fair equal and nondiscriminatory conditions to be met by all users of the AIRPORT as may be necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the AIRPORT and provide further,that the SPONSOR may prohibit any given type kind or class of aeronautical use of the AIRPORT if such use would create unsafe conditions,interfere with normal operation of aircraft,or cause damages or lead to the deterioration of the runway or other AIRPORT facilities J To suitably operate and maintain the AIRPORT and all facilities thereon or connected therewith which are necessary for AIRPORT purposes and to prohibit any activity thereon which would interfere with its use for aeronautical purposes.and to operate essential facilities,including night lighting systems,when installed in such manner as to assure their availability to all users of the AIRPORT,provided that nothing contained therein shall be construed to require that the AIRPORT be operated and maintained for aeronautical uses during temporary periods when snow,flood or other climatic conditions interfere substantially with such operation and maintenance 4 To refrain from entering into any transaction which would operate to deprive the SPONSOR of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the covenants made herein,unless by such transaction the obligation to perform all such covenants is assumed by another public agency eligible to assume such obligations and having the power,authority and financial resources to carry out such obligations and if an arrangement is made for management or operation of the AIRPORT by an agency or person other than the SPONSOR or any employee of the SPONSOR,the SPONSOR will reserve sufficient powers and authority to insure that the AIRPORT will be operated and maintained in accordance with these covenants 5. To maintain a current Airport Layout Plan(ALP)of the AIRPORT having the approval of the STATE which shows building areas and landing areas,indicating present and future proposed development,to conform to the ALP in making any future improvements or changes at the AIRPORT,and to furnish the STATE a current ALP of the AIRPORT and such information as is necessary to keep the ALP current 6 The SPONSOR hereby assures that it is the Owner,or Lessee of the property or properties on which the AIRPORT is located and that the lease,if any,guarantees that the SPONSOR has full control of the use of the property for a period of not less than twenty(20)years from the date of the Agreement. 7. That it will give the STATE through any authorized representative access to and the right to examine all records books,papers,or documents relating to the grant 8 The SPONSOR also assures that it will furnish to the STATE each month a current listing of all aircraft based on the AIRPORT 9. The SPONSOR shall maintain accurate records of all labor,equipment and materials used in this PROJECT The PROJECT costs shall be subject to audit by the STATE Ana SIGNATURE OF SPONSOR'S REPRESENTATIVE TITLE OF REPRESENTATIVE APPROVAL DATE OF BOARD APPROVAL AERONAUTICS DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE r° ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # 12( MEETING OF MOTION BY: .c2 SECONDED BY : ‘''J YFS ';fl 1 BSTA i N I COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V _ COUNCILMAN EIDSON v COUNCILMAN HILL / COUNCILMAN SHANKS V VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS I IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: J ITEM NO, 12 CALL UPON THE CIFY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO , 80-17 , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 80-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND BUELL WINTER MOUSEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC , FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AN AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTION STUDY FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED , FOR APPROVAL • • • • ITEM NO. 12 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF RESOLUTION NO, 80-17, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF TH CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 80-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND BUELL WINTER VOUSEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC , FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AN AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTECN STUDY FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED, FOR DENIAL ROLL CALL VOIE SHEET NOTES ITEM # (3 MEETING OF MOTION BY: J SECONDED BY : YES NO STA1 "I COUN CILMAN HILL V/ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO v COUNCILMAN SHANKS v COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN EIDSON V VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO V MAYOR SEEMAN _ ✓ t UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: (� • • I ITEM NO, 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVICE BE HELD ON THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, AT 6:00 P.M. ROLL GALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Ce/v"C (iC ITEM # MEETING OF • MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YFS 110 ABSTAIN OUNC I LMAN _DA.t&LAIsbo COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN EIDSON f COUNCILMANHILL v VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO v MAYOR SEEMAN - UNANIM US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES tsfrPS1 R ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: V 5 SECONDED BY : fr YFS I, VD 1 r�CTp I`J COUNCILMAN BURGESS ' COUNCILMAN DAMIANO 4/7 COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL V COUNCILMAN SHANKS U KE-MAYOR GRANIL.LO V MAYOR SEEMAN 1 V UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF flPACHE JUNCTION, ARILONA, THAT THE PART TINE flP.GISTRATE CONTf'ACT BE lER1;INATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH L►S PROVISIONS AND THAT THE REQUIRED TERfINAATION NOTICE BE GIVEN; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT NOTICE BE GIVEN THAT APPLICATIONS FIR FULL TINE IIAGI S T RA T E EMPLOYMENT PAY BE SUBMITTED FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. 'CE SH[firF �/. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR IN REPLY BRUCE BABBITT REFER TO. GOVERNOR STATE HOUSE PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85007 May 20 , 1980 Ray Lee , City Manager City of Apache Junction P . 0 . Box K Apache Junction , AZ 85220 Dear Mr . Lee : It is my pleasure to inform you that the Alternates of the Four Corners Regional Commission have approved a grant in the amount of $53 , 000 for the Apache Junction General Plan Selected Elements . In accordance with Certification made in your application you are hereby instructed not to enter into contracts for work on the project and not to begin work on the project until you have an approved contract signed by the Executive Director and the Federal Cochairman . I hope this grant will assist in the economic development of your area . If you have any questions , please contact Ronnie Lopez , my alternate on the Commission , here in my office . Sincerely , 72-T2g4e14.°<-- az- Bruce Babbitt Governor BB j s 1 MAY Z3 1980 iffo V v W" Z 4Pizov ' cOity olff cpuche 09unction MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGFe777. FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUBJECT: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES MEETING OF MAY 5, 1980 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Enclosed you will find copies of approved "Minutes" from a recent meeting of the Board of Adjustment. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. JWG/kmc 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AZ ^ PINAL COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 150 N. OCOTILLO DRIVE APACHE JUNCTION, AZ MAY 5, 1980 7:00 p.m. In Attendance Regrets Don Nesser, Vice Chairman Joe Jessamine Bill Vaughn Bill Furness Joe Gero, Exec. Sec. Pete Nunn 1. Mr. Nesser called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and requested the roll call of members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined two members present as listed above. 3. Mr. Nesser declared no quorum and therefore no business can be transacted. The Board therefore adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Joseph W. Gero Executive Secretary Approved; Joe Jessa mne Chairman / / N H��y det r---) •Ai p�C�Q� P. O. BOX 879 APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85220 PHONE 602-982-2491 _ _6b �qrr� Office of the Principal May 27, 1980 Bill McDaniel , Police Chief Aoache Junction Police Department Dear Chief McDaniel , Just a quick note to thank you and your men for the fine job they have been doing the past few months. I know I , as well as the other faculty members here at school , appreciate the Prompt service and cooperation from you and your department. Please pass on a special thanks to Lt. Sedar. Graduation night went very smoothly because of him and your other fine officers. I am looking forward to starting the new school year with you and your department. Sincerely, RECEIVE mg 2 81980 rApache jct.police Dept- Marvin Smith Assistant Principal mjq d2 9 444 ITEM No. - D PL ------ - - ow GlfSINF55 �i NW,/ BUSINESS ../.......... i . I*+FO/ REPORTS C17Y MANAGER e-{_c PQACHF✓G gRizONP ..) Wily o C4pache 2unctian TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGE`' FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT: PUBLIC NOTICE ..► FOR YOUR INFORMATION Please see attached. ... JWG/kmc ITEM No. /5' _.._.- ........._ PU-'L;C HEARING APPROVED �� /(_D OLD SUS iESS • N:Vp' DUE:NESS ; , ,'=A 0:: 44(.46 L' _ INFO/REPORTS CITY MANAGER p�--------"I„ 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 PUBLIC NOTICE Public Notice is hereby given that the Planning and Zoning Commission • of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is amending its rules and regulations to change its regular meeting time and place to 7:00 P.M. , the second Tuesday of each month, at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex at 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona. Public Notice is hereby given that the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is amending its rules and regulations to change its regular meeting place to the Apache Junction City Hall Complex, 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona. The regular meeting will be 7:00 P.M. , the first Monday of each month. This Public Notice if effective June 1, 1980. Dated at Apache Junction, Arizona, this 21st day of May, 1980. Publish the 25th day of May, 1980. Rich 0esterle City Clerk • • --r PQACHE✓,_ we. Z ,_ qR/ZoNP ity C9479ache cOunctian May 28, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR ANDiBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAGER`] FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Jab EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUBJECT: SUPERIOR COURT APPEAL OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION On May 19, 1980, the Board of Adjustment heard the case where members of the Archie Lowe family appealed the decision of the Zoning Admin- istrator to revoke permits issued for lots 213, 214 and 215; said alleged lots being seperately owned by various members of the Lowe family. The general location of this action occurred at the Southwest inter- section of Broadway and Warner Drive. The attached letter from Mr. Robert Schlosser, attorney for the members of the Lowe family, indicates that the Board's action in deciding in support of the Building Offi- cial's action to revoke the building permits, will be appealed to the Superior Court. This memo is being given to you for information only. When the par- ticulars of this case become available, the staff will inform you of them. ITEM No. -------._._.----•- _ 5/92 7-21- 1 AF?RC r.S S .. 1 r - FOR AGLN'/ JWG/kmc .....L _ J CITY MANAGER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 • LAW OFFICES •^ MACHMER,SCHLOSSER 8 MEITZ, LTD. GERALD A MACHMER 1708 EAST THOMAS ROAD ROBERT H.SCHLOSSER PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 RONALD M MEITZAIWA TELEPHONE (602) 263-9305 May 23, 1980 Mr. Joseph W. Gero Director of Planning City of Apache Junction P. 0. Box K Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Re: Appeal of members of the Lowe family Dear Mr. Gero : This letter is to formally notify you that we do intend to appeal the Board of Adjustments ' decision to Superior Court. I presume we have exhausted all administrative remedies necessary prior to filing a Superior Court ac- tion. I also presume that the City will forestall taking further action relative to these building permits pend- ing at least a Superior Court decision. If I am incorrect, please advise forthwith. Sincerely your , A \` 11:k-1* obert H. Schlosser RHS/ea cc: Lowe Susan Goodwin (:s.p.CHE 1 n� U &11'A.eliAv Z r, gR,ZONp. ity C4pache 09unction May 28, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: RAY LEE, CITY MANAG Z FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING J EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES (4/29/80 AND 5/14/80) FOR YOUR INFORMATION Enclosed you will find copies of approved "Minutes" from recent meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. Please have the original "Minutes" inserted in the "Minutes" book. Thank you. em.4 . JWG/kmc ITaQ . sz__C�-�•a'. N AFORA C,S;v QAOF.Zvi//- [.. - INFO/REPORTS ---Y -CITY ANAGER 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AZ + PINAL COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. 150 N. OCOTILLO DRIVE APACHE JUNCTION, AZ MAY 14, 1980 7:00 p.m. In Attendance Guests George Baljo, Chairman John Drummond Mildred Baker rarl Laabs Roy Hudson Don Nesser John Hutchens Keith Stacher Ronald Kell Richard Oltman Susan Sharp Sims Strickler Ilene Taylor Joe Gero, Exec. Sec. 1. Mr. Baljo opened the meeting at 7 p.m. and requested roll-call. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined all members present as noted above. 3. Mr. Baljo requested the Executive Secretary brief those present on a requested rezoning in Pinal County but not in the zone of influence. 4. Mr. Gero reported the request is to rezone 150 acres from Suburban Ranch (SR) 3 1/3 acre minimum lots to Suburban Homestead (SH) one acre minimum lots. The property is located in Sec. 9 T1S, R9E (part of the south 2) . The proposal is outside the zone of influence. The planner would not object to the rezoning in that the health department would have to approve septic permits and one acre lot is low density. 5. Kell/Baker M/S Be it resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that it has no objection to the proposed rezoning (Pinal County case PZ-12-80) application of Harold Crist for 150 acres from SR to SH. The motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. 6. Oltman/Strickler M/S Be it resolved by the Planning aid Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the meeting be adjourned at 7: 15 p.m. in that there is no further business on the agenda. Page 2 - Planning and Zoning Commission The motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. Respectfully submitted, Joseph d. Gero Executive Secretary Approved: P. George Baitel o Chairman Aa.l J MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA PINAL COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT .•. 150 N. OCOTILLO DRIVE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA APRIL 29, 1980 7:00 P.M. In Attendance Guests George Baljo, Chairman John Drummond Mildred Baker Leo Frazier Roy Hudson Thomas Damiano John Hutchens Wendell J. Clarke Ronald Kell Clay Worst Richard Oltman Joe Morvak Susan Sharp Mike Carden Sims Strickler Mary H. Pancheri Ilene Taylor Jerry Pancheri Joe Gero, Executive Secretary Kathy Connelly, Secretary 1. Mr. Baljo opened the meeting at 7.05 P.M. and requested the roll-call of the members. 2. Mr. Gero called the roll and determined all mem- bers to be present as noted above. 3. Mr. Baljo declared a quorum present and asked the members to review the sets of minutes from the meetings of March 18, 1980; March 24, 1980 and April 16, 1980. He called for a vote on the approval of the minutes as indicated. 4. Kell/Strickler M/S Be It Resolved the "minutes" of March IT- March 24 and April 16, be approved as written. The motion passed as follows: March 18, 1980 8-0-1 March 24, 1980 7-0-2 April 16, 1980 8-0-1 5. Mr. Baljo announced the public hearing opened on Ordinance No. 41 (PZ-6-80) and asked the executive secretary to brief those present on Ordinance No. 41. 6. Mr. Gero briefed those present on Ordinance No. 41 (PZ-6-80) stating that it is a Commission recommendation to the City Council for the adoption of a Building Permit and Fee Schedule based on Table 3-A in the Uniform Building Code with suggested approval. being 70% of the scheduled amount as outlined in Table 3-A. Page 2 - Planning and Zoning Commission 7. Mr. Gero explained to those present that if the building permit fees were eliminated from the ordinance, a substitution must be in- stituted. 8. Mr. Baljo requested that Mr. Gero explain the appli- cation of Table 3-A to the Apache Junction schedule of fees. 9. Mr. Gero explained that the Table 3-A as outlined in the Uniform Building Code was a com- posite of the national average. The appli- cation of the fee schedule in Apache Junction would be 70% of this national average. If the fee schedule was less than the 70%, then the public would be forced to subsidize the balance. If the fee schedule was more than the suggested 70%, then the City would be actually charging a fee that was higher than the cost. 10. Mr. Gero called on the City's Building Administrator, Mr. Leo Frazier, to further explain the fee schedule to the Commission members. 11. Mr. Frazier explained that the suggested 70% as applied to Table 3-A was based on the cost of con- struction within Apache Junction as compared to the National Average. The cost in Apache Junction is 70% of the National Average, thence the 70% application of the fee schedule. He offered additional to the Commission in that surrounding areas, such as Tempe, were already applying the 70%. He concluded by explaining that the present fee schedule in Apache Junction was 20% of the National Average. 12. Mr. Baljo read the proposed resolution to those present and called for speakers: for the resolution and against the re- solution. 13. Mr. Kell Is the 1979 Uniform Building Code based on ''o` property value? 14. Mr. Gero No, it is based on the cost of construction nation-wide. 15. Mr. Morvak asked if the proposed schedule fee would equate the cost of constructing a house with that of constructing a fence. Page 3 - Planning and Zoning Commission .�. 16. Mr. Morvak asked how building fees were allocated throughout adjoining areas, particularly Mesa, and how they were to be allocated in Apache Junction. 17. Mr. Gero stated that he did not have that infor- mation available but would find out for the benefit of the Commission and those present. He further explained that the fee schedule as outlined in the UBC was based on the cost per square foot of construction nationwide. He added that the cost of construction per square foot in Apache Junction was 70% of that national average. 18. Mr. Baljo emphasized that the UBC was not a regula- tory publication and was used only as a guideline. He added that the City Council reviews the Commission's recoumnendations, but still has the option of adopting another r•. plan or course of action. 19. Sharp/Hudson M/S "Be It Resolved by the Planning and -Zoning Couunission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that it recommends to the City Council the approval of Ordinance No. 41 (PZ-6-80) . Further, it is recom- mended that the Building Official be in- structed to use Table No. 3-A "Building Permit Fees" as found in the currently adopted Uniform Building Code (1979 edition) , but that the schedule of fees be adjusted not to exceed seventy percent (70%) of the scheduled amount, and that the immediate implementation not exceed fifty percent(50%) , and the distribution be subject to review". 20. Mr. Baljo called for a discussion of the amendment to the proposed ordinance. 21. Mr. Hudson How are the fees charged by other cities Oakdistributed among the various departments? 22. Mr. Morvak Mesa charges a basic fee and an additional fee for schools and recreation. 23. Taylor/Strickler M/S "Be It Resolved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the Council consider a reduction of the proposed building fees, Ordinance No. 41". Page 4 - Planning and Zoning Commission Specifically, that the 1976 UBC building fee schedule be adopted, and that a major reduction be made in the Plan Review per- centage of the formula used to compute the total fee. 24. Mrs. Taylor explained that she views the proposed fee schedule as a 400% increase over the present fees with regard to single-family dwellings and other livable building structures. She expressed the feeling that, based on the present state of the economy and the high interest rate imposed on lending funds, that a lower fee schedule be adopted to encourage construction in Apache Junction. 25. Mr. Gero explained to the Commission that the amend- ment as proposed by Mrs. Taylor would cut the City income in-half, forcing the tax payers to pay 50% of the building office functions. 26. Mr. Baljo reemphasized to the Commission that the fees and codes suggested by the members could be changed by the City Council. 27. Mr. Gero suggested that the members consider the 70% application of the building fees as previously discussed. These fees were based on the 1979 information compiled in the UBC. 28. Mr. Frazier explained to the Commission that the UBC was published in three-year increments. 29. Mr. Baljo suggested to Mr. Gero that a detailed ex- planation of the fee schedule be presented to the Commission so that they could make a decision with complete understanding. 30. Mr. Gero suggested that a brief break in the pro- ceedings would allow him time to prepare a Aukvisual explanation of the UBC and proposed fee schedule. 31. Mr. Baljo called for a 10 minute recess. 32. Mr. Baljo called the meeting to order at 8:30 P.M. and asked Mr. Gero to proceed with his clarification of the proposed building fee schedule. 33. Mr. Gero illustrated to those present how the UBC Page 5 - Planning and Zoning Commission cost of per square foot construction nationwide was compared to that of Apache Junction. He explained, via illustration, how the proposed fee schedule would only be 70% of the national average based on the cost of construction in the area. 34. Mr. Kell inquired as to the cost per square foot construction in the area. 35. Mr. Morvak speaking as a Valley builder, explained that the cost per square foot was $21.00. 36. Mr. Baljo asked if there were any more questions or comments on the proposed fee schedule before the Commission proceeded to take a vote. 37. Mr. Baljo called for a vote on the proposed ordinance and requested that Susan Sharp re-read the ordinance so that it could be entered into the record. 38. Mr. Baljo called for a vote on the amendment pro- posed by Taylor/Strickler: the motion was defeated by roll-call vote: 3-6 39. Mr. Baljo called for a vote on the amendment proposed by Sharp/Hudson. the motion passed by roll-call vote: 6-3 40. Mr. Baljo asked if there was any additional business before the Commission. 41. Mr. Gero reminded the members that the next meeting was scheduled for May 20, 1980 and would include discussion of Proposed Ordinance No. 46. He asked of there would be any objection to holding the meeting on that date. 42. Sharp/Taylor M/S "Be it resolved that the Planning and Zoning Couuuission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, hold its next regular meeting on Tuesday, May 20th at 7:00 P.M. 43. Mr. Baljo called for a roll-call vote on the motion the motion passed by roll-call vote: 8-1 44. Mr. Baljo called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. Page 6 - Planning and Zoning Commission ,^ 45. Oltman/Str.ickler M/S to adjourn the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 46. Mr. Baljo called for a roll-call vote on the adjourn- ment of the meeting: the motion passed unanimously by roll-call vote. 47. Commission adjourned the public hearing portion of the meeting at 9:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Josep W. Gero Executive Secretary Planning and Zoning Commission Approved: ri /zy . , eorge alj o Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF May 21, 1980 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. -0- (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 29, -0- 1980, BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 7, 1980, -O- BE AND HEREBY ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 48, BE READ BY -0- TITLE ONLY, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDIN- ANCE BE WAIVED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE ORDINANCE NO. 48, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR City Published AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZ- Clerk/ and applicant ONA AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE Planning notified. ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR CERTAIN PARCELS Director LOCATED IN APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FROM TRAILER HOMESITES (TH) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (CR-3) , SAID PARCELS BEING THE SUBJECT OF REZONING CASE PZ-7-80; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS: AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 41, BE READ BY TITLE -0- ONLY, WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (MOTION CARRRIED) THAT ORDINANCE NO. 41, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND City Published CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, Clerk/ AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY RE- Planning PEALING SECTION 2705 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; PROVID- Director ING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT A SPECIAL MEETING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF ORD- City posted "` INANCE NO. 47, BE SET ON MAY 28TH, 1980, AT 5:30 P.M. Clerk 5/23/80 AT 150 N. OCOTILLO. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE CITY MANAGER'S ACTION TO PROVIDED THE CITY'S City completed SHARE OF SUMMER RECREATION FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF Manager $10,000 BE AND HEREBY IS RATIFIED. (MOTION CARRIED) CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF May 21, 1980 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-14, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR City being impli- AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZ- Clerk/ mented. ONA, REAFFIRMING AND CLARIFYING THE BUILDING PERMIT Director FEES REQUIRED FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMITS of Public PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING Works CODE, 1979 EDITION, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMEND TO THE BUILDING IN- Director being impli- SPECTOR TO USE A 60 PERCENT MODIFIER ON THE UBC. of Public mented (MOTION CARRIED) Works THAT JOHN DRUMMON AND DAVE ROBINSON APPOINTMENT FOR A City 3 members THREE YEAR TERM; AND WILLIAM WRIGHT AND JOHN FORSBERG Clerk/ have been APPOINTMENT FOR A TWO YEAR TERM AND RICHARD OLTMAN Director given their APPOINTMENT FOR A ONE YEAR TERM; AND DR. HOWARD DOWNS of Public Oath of Office NON-VOTING MEMBER, APPOINTMENT FOR A ONE YEAR TERM, TO Works others are THE AIRPORT COMMISSION EFFECTIVE MAY 21, 1930, BE AND being imp1i- HEREBY ARE APPROVED. mented. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT RESOLUTION NO. 80-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Director being impli- COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, of Public mented. ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF Works/ THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IN THE CITY OF APACHE City JUNCTION, ARIZONA, TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL Clerk AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ARIZONA, DIVISION OF MOBILE AND MANUFACTURED HOUSING STANDARDS, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND City posted. LEGAL ADVICE BE HELD ON THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 1980, AT Clerk 5/30/80 6:00 P.M. , AT 1001 N. IDAHO. (MOTION CARRIED) THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:16 P.M. -0- (MOTION CARRIED) CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING May 21, 1980 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION COUNCILMAN DAMIANO REQUESTED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CITY REVIEW THE UBC FEES IN THE NEAR FUTURE OR QUARTERLY. COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS ACTION NOT COMPLETED MEETING ACTION DATE REQUEST AGENCY STATUS 9/19/80 THAT RESOLUTION NO. 79-37, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR City rction contin THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, Manager/ ent upon City's ARIZONA RELATING TO THE APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF City :pprox. 100 COMMERCE, BE ADOPTED TO SET ASIDE A ONE-HALF ACRE Clerk acres of lands PARCEL OF LAND WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX PARCEL rom State Land FOR THE USE OF THE CHAMBER. Iepartment. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: N SECONDED BY: -Vr YES _ NCI ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN ?RIJRGFSS_ I COUNCILMAN FTnSON COUNCILMAN HII L COUNCILMAN DAM TANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: • • ITEM NO, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT ° 10$ P. M. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION )20, ,t- P ,-,..___ REQUEST TO SPEAK a NAME: DATE: ADDRESS: ive)y 1, f�f'� /Q / AGENDA ITEM: Je (L vdr-i cif a k,c, :/ 1 �V -d� [‘iry CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME• At Pi. ,4 N O le£ 4i S DATE: 6 - 18 - U ADDRESS: AGENDA ITEM: (i-j, ) p2D 140 . STO CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK / ` (� NAME: ad googe5 DATE: 6/ � � �/ ADDRESS: /C 3i W ,4040/AIO L4 ie MCP <11/itic17oN AGENDA ITEM: Rao//(1 e OF o, 0. L CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION pp A ) REQUEST TO SPEAK ' NAME: Imo, A ►• ,t l9 DATE: 11),: p',v 1 2 b ADDRESS: /b71 lbVA f hi if VA' AGENDA ITEM: * 3 /Gi- d "fli , _^74QT,f ll CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION <747- 0EQU T 0 SPEAK NAME: (1 DATE: ( "/6er.- D ADDRESS: 1-z--- r ,_ AGENDA ITEM: ) l fl Q5� z`�- ::)-Aj t_-‘% (II CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: DATE: C/ , �6/ ADDRESS: 9/7 / ,/ , 9LZ TA7/02(/ A ITEM: (: - � " � L L% o" i bet el CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: C,/��p /�l h,gati DATE: ,�- / �� ADDRESS: a?,6 I L /7 e20 /_ /(i ,-.f.s /e-e� --4 AGENDA ITEM• (7, l/ ` t, 6- e r 4 7, z i46.4.44(frtA/ °A1 r A>44‘0-4a*.* CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION / REQUEST TO SPEAK , / NAME: U �,/ / Lj , � , DATE ADDRESS: /c/l C-,, / 4' LL/ae / i-/ AGENDA ITEM: Xte,✓J ,7 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: -E - L,/A A S DATE: 6 / O/s6.- ADDRESS: 370 & , I2 J H A11E- A t AGENDA ITEM: r