Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981 03.04 City Council Regular Agenda I ..... . ail .6.: •`, 0 ff gR,ZoNP Witt' o ( .4pacheunction CITY COUNCIL Ank• REGULAR MEETING AGENDA MARCH 4, 1981 7:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1 ) ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 18, 1981 AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS .•. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS (3) VEHICLE LOAN AGREEMENT (4) PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT BOARD (5) APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE HEALTH COMMISSION (DISCUSSION ITEM) (6) EQUESTRIAN COMMITTEE (COUNCILMAN SHANK'S DISCUSSION ITEM) (7) EXECUTIVE SESSION, MARCH 18, 1981 (8) INFORMATION AND REPORTS REQUESTS OF COUNCIL 9) ADJOURNMENT 001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL ROLL CALL IPRESENT ABSENT MAYOR SEEMAN VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON [ . V COUNCILMAN HILL V COUNCILMAN SHANKS V TOTAL I STAFF PRESENT CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES L DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY V DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ✓ CITY ATTORNEY OTHER ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES '710 ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES N0 ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNC I LMAN E I DSON VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN Y - UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: Ado\ -- •. ' . Amok • AN\ ITEM NO . 11 RE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . irk Auk CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING February 18, 1981 The regular meetino of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on February 18, 1981, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to notice required by law Amok CALL TO ORDER Mayor Seeman called the meeting to order at 7 00 o m INVOCATION Councilman Eidson led the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Council and public participated in the Pledoe of Alleniance ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present Councilman Thomas Damiano, Councilman Jerry Burgess, Councilman Jimmy Eidson, Councilman Norman Hill, Councilman Marie Shanks, Vice Mayor John Granillo, and Mayor Virginia Seeman Staff Present: Director of Public Safety (Acting City Manager) Bill McDaniel C City Clerk/Director of Administrative Services Marlis Davis Director of Planning Joe Gero Director of Public Works Rich Broman Assistant City Attorney Susan Goodwin Others with Council Business Mrs Jean Perkins, 616 N. Cactus, Apache Junction 004, Mr. Joe Morvak, 122a S Doran, Mesa ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA Vice Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS AMENDED Councilman Damiano seconded -- � the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF • THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 4, 1981 Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 4, I981, BE, AND HEREBY ARE, ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS Vice Mayor Granillo read a letter from the Superstition Horsemen's Association inviting the Council to an open forum discussion concerning the future of the equestrian community to be held on February 22, at 2 00 p m at the Circle C Ranch. Vice Mayor Granillo announced that he and the Mayor had met on February 18 with the State District Director and the District Administrator of the Department of Economic Security He stated it was determined at the meeting that a local D E S office was needed in Apache Junction. The site proposal and other needs for an office are to be discussed with the Director of Public Works and a mobile unit is tentatively scheduled to be moved to the City comnlex to house the D.E.S office pending permanent quarters Services to be offered at the local office will be full-service Foodstamps and Aide to Dependent Children The Vice Mayor stated that once the building is moved on-site there will be further services available Councilman Damiano stated he attended the recent Airport Forum held on February 11, 1981, and reported the Airport Commission is doing an excellent iob in coordinating the Apache Junction Airport site selection and master plan study. He emphasized that all sites under consideration in the study for the airnort are outside the City limits and the Council is waitina for the Commission to com- plete its assigned task and make recommendations to the Council. He stated when the Council receives appropriate information, the recommendations will be considered and if the Council agrees the development of an Airnort would be an asset to the Community by attracting clean industry, promotina business, creating local jobs, and increasing the standard of living, it will refer the final decision to a vote of the residents of the community. He emphasized the establishment of an airport will be uo to the citizens, not to the Council CALL TO THE PUBLIC Mrs Jean Perkins, 616 N Cactus, Apache Junction, thanked Councilman Damiano for giving the citizens an opportunity to vote on the Airport issue but stated she would like written assurance that the matter would be put to a vote of the people Mayor Seeman explained that nothing would be purchased without the voters approval She asked Director of Public Works Rich Broman to comment Rich Broman, Director of Public Works, stated the question of an Airport is a study right now; after the study is completed the consultant will made a recommendation to the Airport Commission The Commission will then make their recommendations of a site location to the City Council He stated that before the City would enter into any kind of arrangement, the City would want community approval to proceed with development Mayor Seeman pointed out in response to Mrs Perkins request the minutes would state that whether or not there would be an Airport in Apache Junction would be decided by a vote of the people. Mr Joe Morvak, 1224 S Doran, Mesa, stated it has come to the attention of several of the builders in the area that there are currently temporary delays in the Building Department concernina the processing of building permits He stated the obvious problem appears to be a shortage of personnel rather than a problem within the organization as far as doina the work He stated the number of people who physically appear at the desk and the number of phone calls received is totally inhibiting the ability of the one full-time and one apparent nart- time person who handle the work flow required to process the necessary paperwork He stated on February 10th he requested building permits for three homes which he received on the 18th, and there was a push to get them out in that time oeriod He stated there are procedures which can minimize some of the paperwork and the processina time on most cases that do not reouire an extensive plan review He stated anyone in the process of building either a commercial or large custom-tyne home should anticipate the need to submit plans for review and also anticipate that the plans will be returned requirina corrections He said that on basic REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1981 PAGE TWO structures, awnings, and the setting up of a mobile home, it should be reasonable for someone to come in with the proper information, present it to the Building Department and be able to leave in a reasonable period of time with a permit that will suffice for everyone's needs and provide the information to the City that they need to maintain proper control and perform the necessary inspections He requested that a way be found so that the Buildina Department can do its lob more effectively because time is money, the builders want to work with the department, they will do what they can to help out on their end,but the builders think the City needs to seriously consider the need for some additional personnel. He stated the Council's consideration of the matter would be greatly appreciated by many people in the City Mayor Seeman stated she understood the problem although with the budget problems there is a freeze on any new hiring of City Staff Acting City Manager Bill McDaniels stated that because of the new legislation and the limit in the budgeting, in the comina year there are no plans to increase any staff Leo Frazier, Building Official, stated that Mr. Morvak is correct, he predicted this would happen last November He stated that over the past two days all calls to the Building Department,and all the people walking into the office,have been loaged He stated in the past two days there have been 186 phone calls and 80 people walk in, futher, he stated he could not disaaree with Mr. Morvak's statements -- the ladies cannot respond to the people who are calling and walking in and process other items Mayor Seeman stated thatthe City Council provided that the building fees would cover the administration of the department, and directed the City Manager to investigate the matter Building Official Frazier stated the Building Department is uniaue because of the self-supporting feature and without increased fees, .lust due to the increased activity, revenue comes up and the money is there Mr Frazier stated that from the professional sources he has access to, and his own personal belief, he feels that for the first six months of the year there will be a steady increase in building and the second half of the year he expects to see things take off dramatically Mayor Seeman suggested the City Manager look into that department, to assess the needs and money available for additional staff and to provide recommendations. Mayor Seeman further stated that the Building Department's problem is not the only one, Animal Control is another -- the budoet restrictions do not allow all the good things that the Council would like to provide to all the people. She stated the City is now starting the budget process for the next year CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Acting City Manager Bill McDaniel reported there have not been any accidents in the west-bound lane on Highway 60 at the intersection/crossover since its modification by the Highway Department PUBLIC HEARINGS There were no public hearings APPOINTMENTS TO THE ELECTION BOARD Mayor Seeman MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BE APPOINTED AS THE ELECTION BOARD FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDUCTING THE PRIMARY ELECTION ON MARCH 24, 1981; AND IF NECESSARY, THE GENERAL ELECTION ON MAY 1981,1981; LOUISE R. HONOR AS INSPECTOR, PATRICIA M. OLTMAN AND BERTHA G ROGERS AS JUDGES; JANE K VIELEHR AND BARBARA J KINGSLEY AS CLERKS FOR THE PINAL COUNTY VOTING PRECINCT 22A/MARICOPA VOTING PRECINCT APACHE; AND THAT SHIRLEY ERICKSON AS INSPECTOR, RENETTA F DEJOHN AND DOROTHY YAEKLE AS JUDGES; AND MARGARET D. CARLIN AND HAZEL 0 SANDERS AS CLERKS, FOR PINAL COUNTY VOTING PRECINCT 22B FOR SAID ELECTION, BE AND HEREBY ARE APPROVED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT ROSALINE DEBNAM BE APPOINTED ALTERNATE FOR PINAL COUNTY VOTING PRECINCT 22A/ MARICOPA VOTING PRECINCT APACHE, AND BETTY J. KITZMAN BE APPOINTED ALTERNATE FOR __ PINAL COUNTY VOTING PRECINCT 22B REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1981 PAAF THRFF Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. Mayor Seeman stated for infor- mation purposes that when the Election Board was originally appointed, two of the appointees reported back that they would not be available to serve which meant replacing them. VOTE Unanimous to, The motion carried. NEW BUSINESS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 87, AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 13-2 OF ORDINANCE NO 38 -,- OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS (WITH EMERGENCIC CLAUSE) ) Mayor Seeman stated the item was provided in response to Councilman Eidson's request to the Department of Public Works. Councilman Eidson stated that the City currently has a situation in which any commercial buildino established within the City limits must provide off-site improvements such as paved streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters. He stated the proposed ordinance will provide for the possibility of postponing the installation of the required off-site improvements by the Director of Public Works provided the applicant agrees to enter into an Improvement District in the future He stated the advantage to an Improvement District is that it doesn't have to be paid for all at once -- it takes a period of about ten years to pay for it and the Improvement Districts could be a couple of years or even five to ten years down the road dependino on how the City noes. Mayor Seeman recoanized Mr Morvak. Mr Joe Morvak, 122A S Doran, Mesa, stated that after having spoken with other people regarding this issue, he could fully agree with the basis under which it is set up. He said the idea that if someone is constructing in an area that could be anywhere from one to three miles from any other paved area or any traffic-type area with a singular building in that location, the expense at the time of construction could be somewhat similar to some of the subdivisions on the south side of Main Street where there are a quantity of half-streets that have been there for twelve to twenty years and are at various stages of deterioration because they are not completE" He stated that,unfortunately,the obligation which ma.y be a ten.. or a twenty-- or thirty-thousand price tag today,in ten years is probably going to be many times that figure. Mr Morvak suggested the City first look at the ability of either the current owner or owners of the property being able to handle a tab that may well amount to something in excess of 100,000 or 200,000 dollars ten years from now He also stated attempting to work out a somewhat legal solution concerning what happens if on a given day it is determined that the stretch of roadway is to be developed fully; he asked if the City would file a lien against the property which would have to be satisfied at time of sale, which could be never, and proceed from that point He said there are a lot of sticky questions because it doesn't matter whether the City is dealing with a non-profit organization, a fraternal group, or a church group, the obligation is still there, the possibilities of problems down the road exist especially when you are talking very large sums of money He stated, being in business, he will cringe at the intitial cost to do off-site improvements today and he would have a difficult time swallowing the lump that it could be in the future considering what has happened to building costs in the last five years He stated he doubted that inflation is going to subside substantially and asked that the work being done on this amendment be given extremely careful consideration to determine what its real effect will be in five or ten years when that area of the city is ready for improvement He stated somebody is going to have to stand up and say the millions of dollars can or cannot be afforded at this time He stated he did not have answers and that he doubted anyone has the final answer, he could only hope the City would cover as many of the loop-holes and problems at this time for the problems that can be foreseen for the future. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1981 PAGE FOUR Mayor Seeman asked Mr Morvak if he was speaking in favor of, or in opposition to, the item Mr. Morvak stated if he was going to physically construct a building on a given corner lot in an area that at the time is somewhat remote within the City he could probably very easily spend 50 to 80 thousand dollars in the process of nutting in curbs, Putters, sidewalks, lights, and building half a street in two directions which could preclude the possibility of ever starting whatever business was intended for that structure. He added that on the other hand, something along the lines of K-Mart and Safeway, with millions of dollars available, the expense is built in and recuperable He felt dealing with smaller concerns and private individuals the problem is very serious and needs to be fully addressed because problems will continue to surface Mr Morvak reminded the Council that numerous months ago the City of Chandler talked about improving specific streets and it turned out that an improvement district at that time was in excess of three times the value of the property being improved Councilman Shanks stated she had voted haphazardly on one ordinance she was unsure of, and because she was unsure of this ordinance she would like some of the fine details worked out She asked what the citizens' recourse would be if the City's Building and Planning Department decide that a certain area needs to be developed, the street on both sides is 80 percent populated, and the people at that time cannot afford the Improvement District. She asked if they would be penalized, or taxed, if their property would have a lien placed on it. She stated she wanted to know this before she voted on the proposed Ordinance. Director of Public Works q w Rich Broman stated with an Improvement District the normal course of events in every type of Improvement District is that the property is assessed,and if the assessment cannot be paid the property is put up for public auction. Mr. Broman gave an overview of the detail that went into the study He stated the request was a very difficult one to consider, minimum valuation on a property, f vehicle trip rates, maximum traffic volumes, development and densities, existing { road conditions, review by committee, bonding construction, and sequencing were 111 considered in establishing the criteria. It became apparent in the study that small businesses could generate just as much traffic, if not more than some of the larger industrial manufacturing and warehousing projects He said that based upon traffic engineering reports, whereas industrial manufacturing and warehousing would generate from about two to four trips per employee, small businesses, drive-in restaurants, auto service stations, and convenience markets would generate from five to seven hundred vehicles per business based on a square footage floor area. There are some things that were considered when the original ordinance was prepared and without Ordinance 38 there is a possibility that vehicular accidents could increase due to inadequate lane widths, speed reductions for moving in and out of development sites could create traffic • problems, dust is a pollution problem and with increased traffic there would be increased pollution, maintenance would increase due to the number of vehicles, and administration costs to monitor and assure future compliance with any of the improvement districts would take considerable staff time. He added that Mr Morvak's comment on inflation is really something to be considered A lot of the costs are turned back to the taxpayer who, over the last twenty years has inherited inadequate roadways, improper drainage, no sidewalks, lower property values, and higher accident potentials due to the lack of improvement Mr Broman stated Ordinance 38 was a good step toward providing many long overdue things in Apache Junction, but with Mr Eidson's remark at the last Council meeting there may be some hardship cases. He stated the intention of the amendment to this ordinance was not for everybody to come in the door and ask for a postponement or to enter into some kind of improvement district, it is for those people who can truly show some kind of hardship where they should be oranted some kind of leniency. He stated if there are some other considerations or modifications to the amendment the Council would like to consider, staff would work further in this endeavor Councilman Eidson clarified through Mr Broman that the improvement district is paid off over a period of ten years, and is not something the citizens would have to come up with riaht away REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1981 PAGE FIVE es Director of Public Works Rich Broman stated the nice thing about an improvement district is that with a development, especially a small development, developing by stases is costly and therefore a number of small parcels can be assembled and a plan created to construct a project in the amount of a quarter mile to a mile of roadway and whenever unit costs are increased, or quantity is increased the unit costs drop. He stated the benefit of the improvement district is to combine all of these things and get the job done at a lower cost He added the inflation factor is something that should be considered, at today's costs, things are going to be continually rising. Mr. Broman stated he felt the businessmen and residents of /, any community owe something to the community in which they live He said it is a small portion to ask for someone to pay their fair share of improving their frontage which will increase the value of their property and provide for the safety and welfare of the Community. Councilman Eidson stated he has been working with Mr. Broman for three or four months trying to come up with something and several alternatives were investiaated He stated of the different possibilities, this alternative appeared to be the best Mr. Eidson added that many areas were looked into and there are always going to be possibilities that can happen and cause problems, regardless of what is done because unfortunately every possibility cannot be anticipated as one looks at the future Assistant City Attorney Susan Goodwin stated that unfortunately the City is faced with haveing to choose between two rather unpalatable choices She stated one was the current cost and current hardship for people, who five years down the road may or may not be able to handle the cost of the improvement, as opposed to the possibility of postoonina the off-site improvements which would permit the future higher costs. She stated she didn't have the answer; the attorneys were asked to come up with an alternative to allow the Council to make a decision What was contemplated, and is contem- plated in for form of an improvement district agreement is that when there is a certain percentage of people in the district they will be reouired to put in the improvement district; there is no choice at that time, an agreement was ( signed giving the City the power to sign their name if necessary. LCouncilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIOZNA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO 87, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Seeman called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 87 by title only with the emergency clause. City Clerk Marlis Davis read as follows. "ORDINANCE NO 87, AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 13-2, APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, AND ORDINANCE 38 OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, BY MODIFYING SECTION 13-2-3-C, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY " Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 87, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 13-2, APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, BY MODIFYING SECTION 13-2-3-C, PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY BE, AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1981 PAGE SIX Amok Councilman Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. In favor - Councilman Damiano Councilman Burgess Councilman Eidson Councilman Hill Vice Mayor Granillo Mayor Seeman Opposed - Councilman Shanks The motion carried EXECUTIVE SESSION, MARCH 4, 1981 Vice Mayor Granillo MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVICE BE HELD ON MARCH 4, 1981, AT 6 00 P.M. IN THE CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM Councilman Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS Councilman Damiano addressed statements that were made at a local restaurant recently (1) The City has a six million dollar budget Councilman Damiano stated this was not true; the budget is published in the newspaper and is $3,023,527 00 which includes a $500,000 contingency to accept grant money (2) That the City purchased five new Buicks for the police department Councilman Damiano stated the fact is that the City at present ^ has one 1980 Buick LeSabre which was pruchased from the lowest bidder and paid for by a Highway Safety Grant The Police Department has no other new automobiles of any make and has no intention of purchasing one. List of all city vehicles is on file in the City Clerk's office. (3) Roy Hudson annexed Gold Dust Mobile Home Park Councilman Damiano stated November 1979, Mr Halbert petitioned the City Council, May 7, 1980,the present City Council approved the petition, and June 7, 1980,annexation was effective He stated Mr. Hudson was not a member of the Council at the time of the request, nor at the time of approval (4) That the City owes $500,000 to the Federal Government for the buildings Councilman Damiano stated the purchase price of all City Hall modular buildings was approximately $158,000 and has been paid in full Councilman Damiano asked that everyone present squash the rumors when they are stated He requested that when people hear these rumors they call City Hall to get the facts REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 18, 1981 PAGE SEVEN /0016. Mayor Seeman stated that the City Council night for working people is from 7 00 to 8:00 p.m. on Tuesdays and each Councilman has been given a day ADJOURNMENT Mayor Seeman adjourned the meeting at 8 00 p m APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1981, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. VIRGINIA SEEMAN Mayor ATTEST MARLIS J DAVIS City Clerk • ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES C;14- ITEM # MEETING OF r � I MOTION BY: / SECONDED BY : I; 0" r YFS NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN DAMJANO C6UNC I LMAN IURESS f COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN V UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: .._. , ITEM NO. 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY 1HE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 18, 1981, BE, AND HEREBY ARE, ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. QACHE -� i ^ U j F DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 'qR/ZONP cOity o C479ache 2unction W E McDANIEL January 16, 1981 .•. MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk THRU: City Manager r� FROM: Director of Public Safety /s/""` REFERENCE: Vehicle Loan Agreement Attached is a copy of the Vehicle Loan Agreement between the City of Apache Junction Police Department and Arizona Department of Public Safety. The agreement period is one year .-. from April 2, 1981 until April 1, 1982. Would you please place this on the agenda for Council approval . 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD.•POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 A G 1 VEHICLE LOAN AGREEMENT This agreement entered into this day of , 19 , between the Arizona Department of /Alik' Public Safety, hereinafter the Department, and Apache Junction Department of Public Safety Police Department - Arizona , a law enforcement agency of the State of Arizona, or one of its political subdivisions, hereinafter the Agency The Department agrees to loan to the Agency for a period of one year from the 2nd day of April 19 81 , until the 1st day of April , 1982 the following vehicles Vehicles to be used on a rotational basis for the purpose of undercover investigations. The Agency agrees to provide total insurance coverage on each of the loaned vehicles with liability coverage in the amount of $ 1,000,000 00 for each person and $ 1,000,000.00 for each occurrence. (Insurance Company. Northwest Insurance Company, Policy No GLA 7342) The Agency further agrees to hold the Department harmless oink from any liability arising out of the use of the Department's vehicles by the Agency The Agency agrees to perform all necessary vehicle maintenance during the time said vehicles are in the Agency's possession The Agency further agrees to repair all body damage which occurs to said vehicles during the time that the Agency has possession of the vehicles. The cost of all maintenance and repairs to the vehicles during the time of this agreement are to be borne by the Agency, and all vehicles are to be returned to the Department in substantially the same condition as when they were loaned. .�. .r In the event that it becomes necessary to resort to litigation to enforce any of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the prevailing party will be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs. • Ralph T Milstead, Director Arizona Department of Public Safety Legal Advisor Arizona Department of Public Safety Assistant Attorney General Arizona Attorney General's Office William E. McDaniel Director of Public Safety ATTEST• Marlis J. Davis City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Susan D Goodwin Assistant City Attorney ROLL CAL- VOTE SHEET NOTES C ITEM # MEETING OF 3 -y-so MOTION BY: 1/0 SECONDED BY: YFS NO ABSTAIN C COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HILL ,. COUNCILMAN SHANKS V VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN 1 . UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: Ink ''43+*.M�+f.rV::tvlY_e w4r`!.!'•Ab4i✓.t%;(1.CYCw:i•e aY_`?l•:•fxi'....Gsr..v.v x'..«... r•Y,., .. .. .. Ia • I I"EM NO, 3 BE II RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CM COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, BE AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA DEPART- MENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR THE LOAN OF VEHICLES ON A ROTATIONAL BASIS. PQACHE G'L i '9R/Z0 N1 amity oe c: 419ache 09unction February 27, 1981 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. THE CITY MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT BOARD In accordance with Arizona Revised Statute 38-847, the police department shall have a local Public Safety Personnel Retirement Board. The Board shall be constituted as follows: the mayor, two members elected by secret ballot by employees of the police department, and two citizens appointed by the mayor and with the approval of the city council. One elected and one appointed board member will serve a two-year term. One elected and one appointed board member will serve a four- year term. Thereafter, every second year, and if a vacancy occurs, an office shall be filled for a term of four years in the same manner as previously provided. A secret ballot election was held by the police department and Gary Jones and Daniel Scott were elected members to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement Board. It is respectfully requested that you appoint two citizens to serve as the appointed members of this board. MJD:rin 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF 3-- ` t4 I MOTION BY: \I 5 SECONDED BY: I p YFS NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN EIDSON_ ✓ COUNCILMAN SHANKS_ COUNCILMAN HILL C .�. COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO V/ MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: r\ ITEM NO, 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA„ THAT THE FOLLOWING PERSONS BE, AND HEREBY ARE, APPOINTED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT BOARD IN ACCORDNACE WITH IHE ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES : (dJ', lLle,,, 41410e1(1 (CITIZEN) SAID TERM TO EXPIRE MARCH 4, 1985 AND L.-1 0 F,4111 2 ; e,.t (CITIZEN) SAID IERM TO EXPIRE MARCH 4, 1983; AND BE IT FURTHER PESPLVED THAT THE TERMS OF THE ELECTED MEMBERS BE AS FOLLO14S : DANIEL M. SCOTT , SAID TERM TO EXPIRE MARCH 4, 1983, A,ND GARY JONES , SAID TERM TO EXPIRE MARCH 4, 198S, dolik CCA ✓'t M ^ ;yy 7_ ` zoN • `bity a ' c ..irache &unction .. February 24, 1981 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor Seeman Members of the City Council THROUGH: City Manager FROM: Councilwoman Marie Shanks SUBJECT: Equestrian Board The Superstition Horsemen's Association is a group of concerned citizens formed to ensure the rights and privileges of horsemen; to ensure the humane treatment of horses; and to actively pursue favorable legislation concerning the above. I have enjoyed the rural livestyle that most of us moved out here to Apache Junction to enjoy. The horse has been part of our western heritage for several hundred years. Active members of the Association have conveyed to me a special need to + become part of the master plan in Apache Junction. To have a good rapport with City Council and supporting staff. Through the creation of the Equestrain Board can they become effective and responsive in their relationship to us and our community. ffig.Marie MJS/ss cc: Director of Planning City Attorney 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)9824002 ON ON Superstition Horsemen's Association Post Office Box 1097 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 February 24, 1981 Apache Junction City Council 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 8 220 p 5 Honorable Members of the City Council: We, the members of the Superstition Horsemen's Association, respectfully request the formation of an Equine Advisory Commission° Such a Commission would serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council and to the Planning and Zoning Department to aid in the formulation of City legislation in reference to horsemen and horse property owners. This Commission would serve in a non-paid capacity. Basically, we would be a liason committee between the City Council, Planning and Zoning and the Horsemen's Association. We wish to submit our proposals for the Twenty Year Project and to actively work with our city government to create a peaceful coexistance between horse owners and non-horsemen. Respectfully, Superstition Horsemen's Association Pat Smith, Secretary 982-7004 Encl. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES rfr° ITEM # ' MEETING 0 (g, MOTION BY: ) SECONDED BY: yFS Nfl ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN SHANKS__ COUNCILMAN E I I? ON V COUNCILMAN HILL t/ COUNCILMAN 'DAM I ANO -MAYOR GRAN �./ VICE NILLO A MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ° ololk .400e. „ . , . . • - _ - • . - • - • • . . . • ITEM NO , 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AnAC!J5 'UNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL ADVICE BE HELD ON MARCH18, 1981, AT 6 : 00 P. M. IN THE CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM. PUBLIC HEARING AIRPORT COMMISSION February 11, 1981 A public informational meeting was held at 7 00 at the Superstition Mountain Elementary School, Ironwood and Broadway, Apache Junction, �.rz Arizona Airport Commission Members Present. Absent Dr D. H. Robinson, Chairman Mr. Richard Oltman Mr. John Forsberg, Vice Chairman Mr John Drummond, Secretary Mr. William Wright Dr J H Downs Ms Priscilla Gardner, Advisory Member Mr. Jack Womack, Advisory Member City Staff Members present. Mr. Joe Gero, Director of Planning Mr. Chuck Newcomer, Assistant " Mr Richard Broman, Director of Public Works Mr Richard Bryant, City Engineer Mrs. Althea Nunn, Recording Secretary Honored Guests. Councilman Damiano �:.r»wx.Fsas.+�wBo. Councilman Eidson Supervisor Karam Manny Pesco, Pres Arizona Pilots Association Chairman Robinson introduced the Airport Commission members, as well as Mr. Damiano and Mr. Pesco, then turned the meeting over to the Consultants. Mr Jim Harris, Buell, Winter, Mousel and Associates introduced Mr. Brust and Mr. Coffman of Coffman Associates. Mr Harris presented the film "Airports Mean Business". Mr. Coffman then gave the slide presentation These slides were taken of local items of interest, and local airports, including Falcon Field and Scottsdale Also presented were slides of the different site selections. Mr. Coffman presented slides of several airports, one of the Kansas City Airport to indicate that this IS NOT the kind of airport for Apache Junction, one of the airports in New Haven, Conn , showing houses en- croached to within 60' of the runway. Overviews of the sites were given by Mr Brust He indicated the site of Williams Air Force Base on the map, and the terrain problems of selecting '-- an airport site. A - Proposed freeway runs across northern section of Site A Privately owned dirt runway on this site Closest site to WAFB B - Adjacent to City limits, and proposed freeway. Mostly Arizona Grant Land, except northern portion which is residential and private ownership This has high power tension lines on site. C - Overlaps Site B, mostly State Grant Land, except northerly portion of site. Same high power tension lines as B D & E-Ironwood cuts thru left portion of D - canal runs from lower part of E to WAFB, dashed lines proposed AZ Project Entire D composed of Arizona State Grant Land Sites D and A would interfere with WAFB. Power lines running thru. Major draw- back, no current access to site. Az. State Grant Land. F - Just south of Sand Tanks area, all of the land is Arizona State Grant Land -z- G - Just East of Site F, just the other side of Highway 60-89, another high power tension line runs through just about the middle of the site. Arizona State Grant Land. Sits right at the base where the terrain starts a rapid rise. H - West side of Highway 60-89, power line on south edge of H, wash across the northern portion Meeting opened for discussion of sites Mr. Coffman read letter from Mr Robert Dugger gg (see attached) Question Tax money being spent on airport. Answer He is correct, money collected from taxes on airline tickets do go on to furnish airport funds It is a trust fund established for the purpose of establishing airports It also collects money from other users of aviation Users pay these fees, the money can be used ONLY for airports. Question Does that work like a road tax? Answer. Yes. Question. Cost of airport maintenance borne by local residents? Answer- Just like any other business, and airports are business, this is one public facility that can generate income to the community Airports charge fees for their use, those fees support the maintenance and further development of the airport. Those fees need to be established and the airport run just like any other business. Question. If this is true, then why are they using federal money, why don't some investors get together and build the airport9 Answer. The cost of providing airport facilities is extremely high, just cannot generate the level of dollars needed by private investment. Question- If this is a money making thing for the City fine If it is not, is there any way the City can bail out? Answer. Certainly, several cities have Question If this airport is such a good deal, why are cities "bailing out"? Answer. There are some airports that are so constrained, and encroached upon, as shown on the slides, that it is creating some kind of an impact on the community so that the community does not want it anymore. Comment. I think this is premature by about 5 years We have no road access here, the Superstition Freeway is seven or more years away We have no industry. Let's spend our surplus money, if we have any, to build the City first, before we build an airport r :.6•.cw Question. Can you give a percentage of airports that actually make a profit? Answer There are many airports that run in the black, I do not know the percentage, or total number. The point I was try- ing to make earlier in the discussion is that any airport, managed properly, can do that. Comment - I think I can help answer this man's question I have prop- erty in Rio Rancho - (in area of Albuquerque, N. M.) ten years ago there was about 5,000 people and no place for them to work There are now about 10,000 people and no unemploy- ment, thanks to the Airport and Industry it brought in This is a small airport similar to what Apache Junction would need _ -3- Comment - I have lived here all my life, I am a 100% year round resident We had a situation on the river with inadequate bridge cross- ings, because of people thinking exactly like you. I feel an airport can do us a great deal of good Sure it cost some- thing, but how about the revenue we will realize from sales tax, how about the revenue from other things associated with the airport? This will more than offset anything it costs us. (Mr. Coffman continued with Mr. Dugger's letter ) Comment - On using Federal Grants Comment by Mr Coffman -This bill (airports) comes up only every 5 years, its new every 5th year, starting 1980 It is 1981 now, Congress has not seen fit to pass it, therefore, there are many airports in the country that are not funded This happens every 5 years. Mr. Dugger's point is that he does not like this used to increase the size of the Federal debt or the Federal budget The aviation trust fund has an excess of five billion dollars, it has nothing to do with the budget, it's set aside for airport development Comment - from letter that airport is only of direct benefit to very few citizens. Comment - the type of facilities we are talking about is aimed at direct benefit to all citizens, not just local pilots. The facility is being developed to attract industry to this area, and is there to serve the aviation demands of the entire area. There is a critical need for airports in this area right now Question - Is it true that there are 150-200 planes at Falcon Field that are not in contact with the tower? Answer - (Mr. Bresnahan) There are planes without radios. Manny Pesco, President of the Arizona Pilots Association spoke on the need for an airport He mentioned that he would not put a business in Apache Junction because it took him one hour to go from Phoenix to get to the meeting. Over one billion dollars (this does not include Apache Junction) was generated in the Phoenix area as a direct result of general aviation We have over 1400 members flying into Falcon Field for a break- fast and meeting, that's 1400 people that are going to be spending money in Falcon Field and Mesa, this money could be spent in Apache Junction You cannot stand still, you must move forward I would like to extend all the cooperation of the Arizona Pilots Association - they are manu- facturers, businessmen, all types of people - that are willing to donate their time and cooperation to help you develop an airport that you can live with, that you can benefit by. Question - Is there any way this can be put on a referendum to the people so we can vote on whether we want it or not? Answer - Certainly Question - will this be done? Answer - I have no idea what will be done, it is up to the residents, and the political leaders Normally that is what happens, this is simply an investigation to provide the City authorities and the community with answers to questions. Question - are you saying this could be? Answer - certainly Meeting was closed with an invitation to the public to come up after the meeting and ask questions of any of the consultants or commission members. Approximately 98 people attended the forum Some of these persons returned a questionnaire inquiring of support or no support for an airport Tabulation indicated. 35 persons SUPPORT such a facility 25 persons would not support such a facility. 5 persons were undecided Amok .. 3114 East Cody Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 February 11 , 1981 The Airport Commission of the City of Apache Junction Apache Junction, Arizona .� Dear Mr. Robinson: Regarding the proposed airport, I would like to make the following points: 1 . Tax money is our money whether it comes from the Federal government, the state government, or the city government. From your explanation to the City Council I understand that a portion of the fees I pay on a commercial airline ticket go to the Federal fund that would be supplying the money for this airport. I object to my taxes being so used. 2. Even granting that Federal funds are "free money" the cost of maintaining the airport will have to be borne locally. Very few municipal airports are self-supporting. These costs may well amount to more than the cost of building the airport. 3. I strongly object to using Federal grants just because if we don't someone else will. This attitude is one of the factors contributing to the size of both the Federal budget and the Federal deficit. The more groups that apply for such grants �.. the greater the appropriation for them in succeeding years . 4. I am not opposed to the pilots in this area having a local airport. I am opposed to paying through my taxes for a facility that I will never use, one that will be of direct benefit to very few citizens. As I mentioned to a previous meeting of this Commission, in my opinion if the local owners of private planes wish an airport, they should pool their resources, acquire private financing, buy their own land and build and run their own airport. In this way the pilots using the airport would have control over management and use fees of the airport. Thank you for this opportunity to present my views . Sincerely, Robert M. Dugger' CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION lnnl N. Idaho Rd. Apache Junction, Arizona SPECIAL MEETING November 21, 1980 A special meeting of the Apache Junction Parks and Recreation Commission was held on November 21, 1980 at 7 00 P M , at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex pursuant to notice as +► prescribed by law PRESENT ABSENT Raymond Foisy Dede Scheff Lois Broman Ronald Staples Gerald Bright Phil Richardson Thomas Farrell Harvey Long Margaret Carlin INVOCATION Mr. Ray Lee, City Manager Pledge of Allegiance Mr Ray Lee, City Manager Acceptance of the Agenda. Mrs. Lois Broman made a motion to accept the agenda, which was seconded by Mr Thomas Farrell Motion carried unanimously Mr Ray Lee, City Manager, opened the first meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission First order of business was introductions of city staff and members Guests present were Mayor Virginia Seeman, Richard Broman, Director of Public Works, Jeff Bell, Community Services Coordinator, Sharon Seder, secretary Mayor Virginia Seeman was intro- ) ducted and gave a welcome to the Parks and Recreation Commission She stated due to Council meetings and other committments, members of the City Council could not attend these meetings on a regu- lar basis but would be glad to attend when necessary Mr Lee explained the organizational chart and the duties of the Parks and Recreation Commission He also explained the liability coverage for the Commission At this time, he opened the floor for nominations for a chairman for the Commission A motion was made by Mr Thomas Farrell to nominate Mrs Margaret Carlin as Chairman of the Parks & Recreation Commission Motion seconded by A motion was made by Mr Phil Richardson to nominate Mrs Lois Broman as Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission Motion seconded by Mr Harvey Long A motion was made by Mr Harvey Long to elect a Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission There were five yes votes and two abstained By secret ballot, there were four votes for Mrs Broman, and two for Mrs Carlin Mrs Lois Broman was elected as Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission. A motion was made by Mr. Harvey Long to elect Mr Phil Richardson as Vice-Chariman of the Parks and Recreation Commission, with Mr Thomas Farrell seconding Mr Thomas Farrell made a motion that nominations be closed and Mr Gerald Bright seconded the motion. There were six votes in favor of Mr Richardson and two abstaining Mr Phil Richardson was elected as Vice-Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission Jeff Bell, Community Service eiN Coordinator, introduced himself and gave the Commission a brief background of his interest in the recreational field Mr. Bell gave a rundown on the programs already effective in the Community Service Department, and what he would like to see in the future. Mr Bell introduced Mr. Rich Broman, Director of Public Works Mr Broman asked that the Commission not only look at the needs of the community today but to also make long range (five - ten years) plans for the future Mrs. Broman took her seat as Chairman for the Commission and opened discussion for a regular meeting night Mr Ronald Staples made a motion for the regular meeting night of the Parks and Recreation Commission to be the ( fourth Monday of each month at Il 7 00 P.M in the City Hall Complex The motion was seconded by Mrs Margaret Carlin Motion carried unanimously. The next regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission will be November 24, 1080 Mr Bell explained the material that was available for persual of the Commission from AORCC It was asked if the City could provide note pads for the Commission's use Mr Thomas Farrell made a motion to adjourn which was seconded by Mr Raymond Foisy Motion carried unanimously Meeting adjourned at 8 04 P M APPROVED C I j�- VICE-CHAIRMAN CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD Apache Junction, Arizona Regular Meeting December 22, 1980 A regular meeting of the Apache Junction Parks and Recreation Commission was held on December 22, 1980 at 7 00 p m at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex pursuant to notice as prescribed by law. PRESENT Absent Lois Broman Margaret Carlin Phil Richardson DeDe Scheff Raymond Foisy Ronald Staples Gerald Bright Harvey Long Thomas Farrell Staff Present Jeff Bell, Community Service Coordinator Pledge of Allegiance. Led by Lois Broman, Chairman Acceptance of Agenda Mr. Ronald Staples made a ~ ai motion to accept the agenda, which was seconded by Harvey Long Motion carried unanimously Acceptance of Minutes A motion by Gerald Bright 111 was made to accept the minutes from November 21, 1980 Special Meeting Motion seconded by Ronald Staples Motion carried unanimously Election of Secretary Lois Broman opened the floor /IS for nomination of a secretary for the Commission DeDe Scheff was the sole nominee Ronald Staples made a motion to elect DeDe Scheff as Secretary to the Parks and Recreation Commission Motion was seconded by Harvey Long. Motion carried unanimously Old Business• None. New Business Coordinator Comments Jeff Bell, Community Service Coordinator, briefed the Commission on recreation and service programs currently offered in the Community Ser- - vice Department Mr Bell also gave an update on the ballfield and tennis court project He stated the cost of the parking lot would be absorbed by the school because this portion of the project was not included in the base bid Mr Bell estimated the completion date would be February 28, 1980 " /, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY BOARDOOF TRUSTEES 1001 North Idaho Apache Junction, Arizona REGULAR,MEETING December 2, 1980 ON A regular meeting of the Apache Junction Library Board of Trustees was held on December 2, 1980 at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex pursuant to notice as prescribed by law ROLL CALL Present Eleanor Lewis, President Jan Hiller, Secretary Elizabeth Burks Absent Donald Taylor Hazel Eldridge Lillian Castro ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES, Regular Meeting, Nov 4, 1980 REPORTS Elizabeth Burks gave a report on Library Extension Service at Fiesta Inn in Tempe Kits were available from Library t_ Extension Service to study for evaluation, educational benefits to bring community membership into the library OLD BUSINESS Contract of intent from Opal Hansen. Mrs Hansen refused to write a letter of intent and refused to follow procedures set by the City Attorney Wayne Lake, Hansen's attorney, requests the City to furnish contract to protect current Library Associa- tion They also refuse to meet with City Attorney Rich Oesterle is to contact Wayne Lake NEW BUSINESS None Motion to adjourn was made by Elizabeth Burks and seconded by Jan Hiller Motion carried unanimously [_ APPROVED vf"Y _ y�/�C i ESIDENT /- /' )441e-e--2.-- SE TARY v CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1001 North Idaho Apache Junction, Arizona erik Regular Meeting January 6, 1981 A regular meeting of the Apache Junction Library Board of Trustees was held on January 6, 1981 at the Apache Junction City Hall Complex pursuant to notice as prescribed by law ROLL CALL Present Eleanor Lewis, President Don Taylor Hazel Eldridge Lillian "Castro Elizabeth Burks Absent Jan Hiller, Secretary ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Elizabeth Burks made a motion to accept the agenda and was seconded by Lillian Castro Motion carried unanimously ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES none available OLD BUSINESS Contract from City Attorney. Have the present Library Board draw up a contract An interruption at this point. Hazel Eldridge presented motion to allow Joe Gero, Director of Planning, to speak, and was seconded by Lillian Castro Mr Gero spoke on the City Hall Com- plex He stated PRC Toups Corp, Mr John Stansel, was to present a slide presentation at 7P M , January 27, 1981, on other city complexes. The City Planning N �.>y.•: Engineer was to present questionaire_ to the audience Ideas are to be brought in writing or drawings All Boards and Commission members are to be interviewed by Mr Stansel sometime in February Make a desired wish list for the complex After Mr Gero's presentation, the Board returned to the old business at hand The particulars about a contract to be made by the Library Associa- tion, who will donate the Library to the City of Apache Junction Clarify item #3 in contract Motion made by Hazel Eldridge and seconded by Elizabeth Burks Motion carried unanimously A motion to ad3ourn was made by Elizabeth Burks and seconded by Lillian Castro APPROVED PIDENT CRETARY i _ ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YFS_ NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN DAM.IANO COUNCILMAN DURESS COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN H ILL ✓J COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓! VI CF.-MAYOR GRANILLO ✓� MAYOR SEEMAN . _ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YFS NO ABSTAIN COUNCILMAN FIDSON_ COUNCILMAN SHANKS_ COUNCILMAN HILL COUNCILMAN BURGESS COUNCILMAN JJAMIANO VICE-MAYOR GRANILLO MAYOR SEEMAN UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL: /11644, ITEM NO , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P . M. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION Amilk REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: / DATE: � - 1.4 - ADDRESS: / .50 I _ `�liy4L AGENDA ITEM• /jr„�� �zi G� CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK �) NAME: 0 (Ai i / H /11 L7 P r S d '+-- DATE: 3 - 4 13 ADDRESS: /9'/ /i" Ire) n/ op d AGENDA ITEM: tilyzzeeezi.. ��� jd-zie.7 //44/.. CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: (/1/tAA,fr, DATE: ADDRESS: �' `t IA/ e4-4An'` .._ AGENDA ITEM: (i;) AM 16. An lb. 1111?/ CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: DATE: k_>////f/ ADDRESS: AGENDA ITEM: J1 eepy„imL C