Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 01.19 City Council Regular Agenda PQACHF ✓ O .z' '1; {. 0 /► L i.,. . U ‘ 'yy,.Ki , I iir; Z �R,ZorP `6ity o . C4packe 09unction CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 19, 1982 7:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. WORK SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF DECEMBER 29, 1981 (3) ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 12, 1982 (4) ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1982 AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (5) APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PARK OLD BUSINESS (6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 120, TANDY (Second Reading) (7) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 121 , PECK (Second Reading) (8) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 125, YODER (Second Reading) (9) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND APPLICATION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 (10) LIBRARY BOARD MEMBER APPOINTMENT NEW BUSINESS (11) ACCEPTANCE OF LIBRARY BOARD MEMBER RESIGNATION (12) WORK SESSION, FEBRUARY 2, 1982 (13) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (14) ADJOURNMENT ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES /14)/ 111() 0 ITEM I/ - MEETING OF iltit MOTION BY: I ; SECONDED BY : 001(1 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON ✓ COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ✓ VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE v UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL / ""r..,.'. .q„'r]^faifwF'^.`:C^y:.` n,. ter, a:�.a-'�-.-.•s.�- :;as.. .,>.�,.-. _.. ....-.... ..._....r'►+UMn... �eti.i+.;.....sva.„_ _ .. - • • �is;° wwx+�w•+ae�.�fdwtiw��et+xea. .. -• �,txaan'a.,o-cK>�e=r„=.�ti. s�+..artyrt,�s,.aua�:=-.a.��`:r�.�+�csi,�av�.,, .n.,n.:,,t,7p.. . ,.,x.. .. s_�;�- v �uEt."+sssecAa+ea+.t+,asa . ITEM NO . 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA, BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . a-. y.M"%y�:Yr i ..a✓ .,.�.,sJ:!YS'L+N1w CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DECEMBER 29, 1981 The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache n. Junction, Arizona, was held on December 29, 1981, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m ROLL CALL Councilmen Present. Councilman Hudson, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Eidson, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke Staff Present Acting City Manager/Director of Public Safety, Bill McDaniel . Acting City Clerk/Deputy City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION ( ) Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT L RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING PERSONNEL MATTERS AT 7 03 P.M. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous eiN The motion carried. RECONVENE ) Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting to order at 8 41 p m ADJOURNMENT Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT _ _ RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CTIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8 44 P M Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE' Unanimous The motion carried APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk _:...<.�e�.:+1�wa:.,:.w:�?.�i�V�o4k�cw.:.�r.--,•;wah;.+u� SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 29, 1981 PAGE TWO iv ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES_ft, J /) ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: c,tkcY\ SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS . COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH_ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON J COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE UNANMUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ikk ""kk 111\ - . ' PIN ITEM NO , 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF DECEMBER 29, 1981, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , r CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 12, 1982 rvr The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on January 12, 1982, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 6 30 p m ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Eidson, Councilman Hudson, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke Staff Present Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel Acting City Clerk/Deputy City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly City Attorney, Arnold Hirsch EXECUTIVE SESSION ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RECESS INTO THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS AND TO CONFER WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY Councilman Shanks seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting Mayor Clarke requested that the record show that Councilman Steelsmith is present and was present during the Executive Session. EMPLOYEMENT OF CITY MANAGER --. -«M. ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ------- — ARIZONA, THAT J JAMES TUVELL BE OFFERED EMPLOYEMENT AS CITY MANAGER EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1, 1982, AT A SALARY OF $2714 00 PER MONTH BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THIS EMPLOYMENT OFFER EXPIRE AT FIVE P M ON JANUARY 18, 1982 Councilman Hudson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 12, 1982 PAGE ONE JOIN sr. ADJOURNMENT ) Mayor Clarke adjourned the meeting at 702pm APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND ° ':^ ' i CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST• (_ KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk eill ,.; SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 12, 1982 PAGE TWO ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ,.., 1\ I� of) ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 0-4A/LtrY1SECONDED BY : i YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS I COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH v/7 COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON I VICE_ MAYOR HILL V MAYOR CLARKE V UNANI'1 US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 0\ /1"ok . „ ITEM NO , 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 12, 1922, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 5, 1982 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on January 5, 1982, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7 00 p.m. INVOCATION Councilman Eidson led the Invocation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Shanks led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Eidson, Councilman _. - Hudson, Councilman Steelsmith, [_ Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke Staff Present Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel Acting City Clerk/Deputy City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly Representing Director of Public Safety, Lieutenant Ed Seder Director of Planning, Joe Gero Director of Public Works, Rich Broman City Attorney, Arnold Hirsch Others Present. Ms Anne Sherfenburg .-.._ Box 1706 Kings Ranch Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr John Forsberg a„. .... � � 265 North Winchester Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 _ - - _ Mr. Jim Norris Executive Director of Pinal County Housing Authority Rt 1 Box 191 Casa Grande, Arizona 85222 Mr. Richard Taylor 616 South Sahuaro Street Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 • ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE PLACEMENT OF AGENDA ITEMS #9 AND #10 WHICH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE REVERSE OF THEIR PRESENT ORDER. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried ACCEPTANCE OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1981) )Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1981, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. Mayor Clarke stated that the last sentence of the first paragraph of page five was deleted from the Minutes. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Clarke presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Reverend Clovis Hibbert, Chaplain for the Apache Junction Police Department. Mayor Clarke stated that "he assists officers in delivering messages concerning deaths in the family, he is available to assist and console the next of kin during times of grief, and working with people contemplating suicide, he acts as intermediate and offers his experience and knowledge in communicating with the people and is always available to the members of the police department and their family for counseling " The Certificate read "For your loyal and loving services to the people of the community of Apache Junction " CALL TO THE PUBLIC Ms Anne Sherfenburg of the Apache Junction Republican Womans Club, Y• ,�. ..• :. presented a check for $400.00, as a donation to the swimming pool fund. Mr John Forsberg, a member of the Airport Commission, 265 North Winchester Road, Apache Junction, addressed the Council on behalf of the Airport Commission in regards to the airport annexation and the Master Plan Mr. Forsberg stated that the City of Apache Junction would benefit from this annexation and that the Airport Commission is not requesting a decision at this time Mr Forsberg informed the Council that the Airport Commission, at their meeting of December 7, 1981, had reviewed the Master Plan and site selection reports and unanimously passed the following motion The Airport Commission has completed a comprehensive study of the Master Plan and site selection of the proposed Apache Junction Airport, accepted the final report on December 7, 1981, as prepared by Buell, Winter, Mousel and Associates and Coffman and Associates. In this regard the Airport Commission recommends that the City Council allow the Airport Commission to continue to coordinate as may be appropriate REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5, 1981 4 > • . PAGE TWO aira.ot .A�r,4 .1. :.�+.7P='Fll* to determine land acquisitions,funding alternatives, public reaction, and industrial development interests, so that information will be available for consideration, when airspace approval is obtained. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel , advised the Council and public that the City had received $6,729 92, the final check from Arizona Outdoor Recreational Coordinating Commission for the ball parks and tennis courts Mr McDaniel called on Mr. Joe Gero, Director of Planning, to outline the calendar for the Planning and Zoning Commission on the General Plan. PUBLIC HEARINGS LIQUOR LICENSE LOCATION TRANSFER, DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LOCATION TRANSFER OF A SERIES 14 LIQUOR L LICENSE FOR THE DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS BY JOSEPH T. BONFANTE, BE AND HEREBY IS,RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSE AND CONTROL Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE• In Favor. Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Hudson, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Hill , Mayor Clarke Abstained Councilman Damiano, Councilman Shanks The motion carried PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 81-21, TANDY (Abandonment) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Director of Planning, Joe Gero, briefed - "'— the Council and public on the petition, stating that this is an application of Mr. Jack Tandy, requesting several local streets be abandoned. Mr. Gero stated that the Apache Junction City Code provides that easements may be abandoned by resolution of the City Council. This item was addressed at the December 16, 1981, regular meeting of the City Council, and was tabled for further discussion Mr Gero informed the Council of the Arizona Water Co request that a utility easement be retained Considering the area of the proposed abandonment, the streets are not necessary for traffic patterns. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5, 1982 PAGE THREE Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 81-21, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT PORTION OF NORTH GOLD DRIVE AND WEST SMOKETREE STREET DESCRIBED HEREIN, FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS, ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUT RESERVING UTILITY EASEMENTS, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED — — Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. '►, Vice Mayor Hill asked if Section 21A and 21B were owned by the same person Director of Planning, Joe Gero, answered affirmative VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 120, TANDY Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 120, BE AND HEREBY IS, REMOVED FROM THE TABLE Councilman Hudson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called on the Director of Planning, Joe Gero, to brief the Council on the petition Mr. Gero briefed the Council on the petition. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 120, by title only for the first reading. Acting City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, - ___". -�-- read as follows: ORDINANCE NO 120, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-81, FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE (TH/PD), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 125, YODER ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5, 1982 PAGE FOUR Mayor Clarke called on Mr Gero to brief the Council on the application Mr Gero addressed the Council regarding the application by Ms Dorothy Yoder, requesting a rezoning from Trailer Homesite (TH) to General Rural (GR), stating that the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommends approval of this application Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application Ms Dorothy Yoder, P 0 Box 1111, Apache Junction, expressed her wish that this application be approved by the - ,. City Council. There being no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the pubic. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 125, by title only, for the first reading Acting City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 125, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERAL RURAL (GR) For >' rt s nwwv KXr►. +wi REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR PEAALTIES. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 121, [_ PECK ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Director of Planning, Joe Gero, addressed the Council on the application, stating that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial of this rezoning case, from General Rural (GR) to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone. Fourteen of seventeen property owners in the area signed a petition in protest of this rezoning ^ Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the - hearing to the public Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 121, by title only for the first reading Acting City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 121, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-21-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES OLD BUSINESS ACQUISITION OF LIBRARY )Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel , �_ - �-�- ----�- REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5, 1982 E:..Y _ PAGE FIVE briefed the Council, stating that after reviewing the budget it was decided to use the Federal Revenue Sharing Contingency Account for the funding of the upkeep and maintenance of the Apache Junction Library. Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE LIBRARY CONTRACT AGENDA ITEM, BE AND HEREBY IS, REMOVED — FROM THE TABLE. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND THE APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY ASSOCIATION FOR THE DONATION OF THE APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY BUILDING AND FIXTURES LOCATED AT 122 EAST SECOND AVENUE, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, WHOSE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS LOTS 50 AND 51, APACHE JUNCTION PLAZA, ACCORDING TO BOOK 10 OF MAPS, PAGE 41 OF PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, BE AND HEREBY IS ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE DIRECTED TO DESIGNATE FUNDS FROM FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT NO 005-105-512- 06-73 FOR THE MAINTENANCE, UPKEEP AND RELATED PAYROLL EXPENSES OF SAID LIBRARY IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,930.00 AND FROM GENERAL FUND NON-DEPARTMENTAL ACCOUNT NO 001-105-512-06-35 FOR UTILITY COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $720.00 I motion Councilman Damiano seconded the VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried ACCEPTANCE OF MASTER PLAN, SITE SELECTION AND FINAL REPORT FOR THE AIRPORT ) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, _ ARIZONA, THAT THE APACHE JUNCTION AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTION STUDY AND REPORT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT COMMISSION, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT THE AIRPORT COMMISSION TO CONTINUE TO CO-ORDINATE AND STUDY AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE, TO DETERMINE LAND ACQUISITION COSTS, FUNDING ALTERNATIVES, PUBLIC REACTION AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INTEREST, SO THAT INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION UPON THE APPROVAL OF AIRSPACE FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried AIRPORT ANNEXATION Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO FURTHER STUDY THE QUESTION OF ANNEXATION OF THE PROPOSED , REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5, 1982 $' PAGE SIX • AIRPORT PROPERTY AND REPORT TO THE COUNCIL THEIR FINDINGS WITHIN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE AIRPORT COMMISSION BE AND HEREBY IS • DIRECTED TO ASSIST THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THEIR STUDY AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion Councilman Damiano stated that this action does not conclude that this will come about. The Council is accepting at this time ad report only and it is not a committment until the airspace is approved. VOTE Unanimous - The motion carried. Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting • Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting at 7:50 p.m LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT Mayor Clarke requested that more talent bank applications for this appointment be presented before choosing a board member Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT ITEM BE TABLED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. Councilman Damiano asked if this [__ vacancy was publicized Mayor Clarke confirmed this. Councilman Hudson stated that board and commission vacancies should be given more publication. Councilman Damiano stated that the /RN Council has two applications at the present, but more are needed VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. U S. HIGHWAY SPEED TEST ..a .y:,.... »--:• �. ) Director of Public Works, Rich Broman, stated that after the Council decision on this issue, he would meet with _ -- _ the State Traffic Director and the Department of Public Safety, to work out any necessary designs Councilman Damiano asked if the speed limit could only be dropped in 10 miles per hour increments Director of Public Safety, Bill McDaniel, answered that this is true, but not when raising the speed limit Councilman Eidson asked why only warning citations would be issued if the 35 miles per hour limit was exceeded Mr. McDaniel answered that the State Department of Transportation will not be advertising the 35 miles per hour speed limit as it has not been legally changed '" REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5, 1982 PAGE SEVEN ,— .w*. Councilman Damiano asked if after the test was conducted could the Polite Department issue citations. Mr. McDaniel stated that this was true, only if the speed limit was legally changed Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BE AND HEREBY IS, DIRECTED THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO CO-ORDINATE AS NECESSARY TO REQUEST THE /01%. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO IMPLEMENT A SPEED TEST THROUGH THE CITY LIMITS IT IS RECOMMENDED TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT 1. THE SPEED LIMIT INCLUDE AREAS BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND ROYAL PALM ROAD 2. THE SPEED LIMIT BE POSTED AT 35 MPH. 3 THE SPEED TEST BE IMPLEMENTED IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE OF THE ADDITIONAL VOLUME OF TRAFFIC CREATED BY THE WINTER VISITORS IN THE LOCALE 4 THE SPEED TEST BE IN EFFECT FOR A MINIMUM OF 120 DAYS. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, BE AND HEREBY IS, DIRECTED THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURE TO ENFORCE THE TEST SPEED LIMIT BY ISSUING WARNING CITATIONS TO VIOLATORS AT THE END OF THE TEST PERIOD, THE COUNCIL REQUESTS REPORTS FROM THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC '�"" '. """'."""" "" """ '" SAFETY, EXPLAINING THE RESULTS OF THE TEST AND PROVIDING APPROPRIATE RECOMMENDATIONS ( Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. I VOTE Unanimous l The motion carried WORK SESSION, JANUARY 19, 1982 ) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON JANUARY 19, 1982, AT 6 00 P.M. - - Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried EXECUTIVE SESSION, JANUARY 9, 1982 ) ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, I. ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD IN THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY HALL COMPLEX ON JANUARY 9, 1982, AT 8 00 A M , FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL MATTERS Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. • ------ •.-.-,---.-___ .- REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5. 1982 PAGE EIGHT PIN INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Councilman Steelsmith reported on the Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilman Damiano reported on the Airport Commission, providing the Council with a report on financing alternatives for the proposed airport, made by the firm of Young, Smith and Peacock Vice Mayor Hill reported the status of the City Manager selection Councilman Damiano commended the Public Works Department on the condition of the medians Mayor Clarke stated that the Library Board is pleased with the acceptance of the Library contract REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 81-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried C Councilman Hudson stated that he had received a petition from citizens of Apache Villa, requesting a street light improvement district Councilman Hudson requested that the City Clerk place this on the next agenda. Mayor Clarke stated that if at all possible, this would be on the next agenda. Councilman Damiano asked if the wiring would have to be installed underground. Councilman Hudson stated that this was possible. Councilman Hudson stated that there needs to be an agreement between the City and Pinal County that low-income housing units be constructed in the form of conventional public housing Mr Jim Norris, Executive Director of Pinal County Housing Authority, explained that if approved, the low-income housing units would have scattered sites, with size and styles to concur with the area in which they are built Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 81-25, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, EXPRESSING THAT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE PINAL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ALLOW UP TO 25 LOW-INCOME HOUSING UNITS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN APACHE JUNCTION, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL f JANUARY 5, 1982 PAGE NINE "oak „auk .. s+a:N"fii+w ,i ::.y91xIVY,'^n,a`;•T.�r.>:!t'YCM The motion carried. Councilman Shanks asked Mr Richard Taylor what the status was on the Palm Springs Water issue Mr Taylor stated that the Corporation Commission is stalling in making a decision on whether or not to hold a hearing. Mr. Taylor informed the Council that his organization has urged the Internal Revenue Service to audit the Palm Springs Water Company, and there will be an audit. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8 20 P.M. Councilman Hudson seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL l WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk �-. -- — ^, •.-�-__ REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 5, 1982 PAGE TEN ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES , 91? - )j) ITEM it MEET ING OF r MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: V-Idi YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS _, /7 COUNCILMAN STEELSMITF V _ COUNC I LMAN PAP1IAN0 VICF MAYOR Hlll i MAYOR CLARKE 1 UNANIM S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL •• 1"N . , . . . . • • • • .. . . • • , ' . • • , . . . ' • .......,... ..; ...• . , ITEM NO . 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . P4ACHE. ta4✓G 2n � !: ,.. � , i 4 . figO"vH i¢I I z gPizoo AP (Oily o 5 C4acIie 2unctian January 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT - - - SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE APPLICATION , DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PARK Attached is a small game Bingo License Application for Desert Queen Trailer Park at 310 North Ocotillo, Apache Junction. Pursuant to the provision of the Arizona Revised Statutes §5-404, the City Council shall hold a hearing and recommend approval or disapproval of the application to the licensing authority which is the Arizona Department of Revenue. Aim k, I have attached responses from the Director of Public Safety and the Director of Public Works which reveals that there are no problems connected with this request. If you have any questions please let me know. 1?;;--Llitecw:)(4tx,,x4.6ir KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk Approver for Agenda..../� , lvc /Dad Item # First Re,,.. ,g 1//.��ga, Second R,,iai«q . ..... . .. . v-"'"p.t New iloomess 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ii PQACHE G O d, y0-4 U �I p: ; z DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY -1 P/ZOWx cO t y o, @4 pache 2unctaon W E McDANIEL January 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk FROM: The Department of Public Safety SUBJECT Application for Bingo License Desert Queen Trailer Park The Department of Public Safety does not object to the issuance of a small game Bingo License to the Desert Queen Trailer Park. 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 ity 4pache unction INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13 , 1982 TO: Acting City Clerk THRU: FROM: (� � Director of Public Works �J9T' SUBJECT: Application For Bingo License Desert Queen Trailer Park A field inspection on January 12 , 1982 , revealed there is limited additional parking throughout the trailer park. So long as the bingo games are reserved for just the park residents , no concern is anticipated. However , should persons from outside the park participate in the games , parking could present a problem. No objection to this application is presented , providing access for emergency vehicles is not hindered and pro- ,� viding no overflow parking will be allowed within the City ' s rights-of-way . RWB/cc Avo ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY SALES AND USE TAX DIVISION 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85007 APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE Check One New License Renewal 0 Avoikk This application must be filed and Bingo License issued before you may lawfully conduct games of Bingo Any license issued pursuant to application and approval shall be non transferable and shall be renewed at the beginning of each calendar year Approved Disapproved OFFICE USE ONLY DATE ISSUED YEAR OF LICENSE LICENSE NUMBER 1 Name of Applicant DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PAi'h owner JOE .ERGARA 2 Address 310 1`,. Octillo Aparh= Junnt.inn, Arz P5220 3 Mailing address if different from above ;ar 414 East i.s0une TP*epe, 9r-z. 4 Have you(the signator)ever been convicted of a felony? 10 5 Have you(the signator)ever been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude? No 6 Does applicant hold a liquor license? No If so what type? 7 Place or places where Bingo Games will be held 310 No. Octillo Apache Junction , ARIZONA (street) (city) ARIZONA (street) (city) ARIZONA (Street) (City) $. !Days of Week Games to be held Monday 8 Thursday (oey) 7:00 AM PM ,4" 12111 9 .Does applicant own premises where Bingo Games will be held? Yes If"Yes ,how long? 2 i•,o. ..4011%, ((0 Yes t�10 `tlUe iucb`�prem(ses been regularly used by the applicant? lilt'ft?4',how long? approx. 4 years 11 If such premises are rented terms of rental No LESSOR'S NAME Joe Vegara ADDRESS Tempe, Arz. 12 Designate individual who will have overall supervision and management of Bingo Games and will be responsible for holding, operating and conducting such games in accordance with the terms of the license and the provisions of the Law NAME Lewis 8 Betty Thompson 310 h. Ccitillo Apache Junction, Arz. 932-230C HOME ADDRESS PHONE BUSINESS ADDRESS same PHONE same 13 Designate member who will be responsible for proper utilization of the entire net proceeds of any game in accordance with State Law and the filing of tax statements,if other than member listed in Question No 12 NAME Joe Vegara 414 East Lagune tercpe, Arz. PHONE 968 CEC HOME ADDRESS BUSINESS ADDRESS Same PHONE Same LUG 1 REV 10 79 OWN 14 Location of Books and Records on Bingo for Audit Purposes DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PARK 310 N. Ocitillo Apache Junction, Arz. (city) (State) 1 15 The undersigned does hereby certify that the applicant is eligible for a license under Title 5,Chapter 4,Article 2,A R S.,and that the entire net proceeds of any game shall be exclusively devoted to the charitable purposes of this licensee y16 The applicant hereby agrees that any license issued hereunder shall be subject to restrictions and limitations imposed by Title 5 Chapter 4,Article 2,A R S.,and rules and regulations promulgated pursuant hereto in force and effect at date of issuance or thereafter adopted,enacted,or promulgated ^k 1 17 The applicant hereby agrees to supply additional information and evidence in support of the statements and matters conta. in this application upon request of the Arizona Department of Revenue STATE OF ARIZONA ) SS COUNTY OF being of lawful age,upon his oath deposes a d says that he is /r of the above named organization,that he is fully and duly authorized to sign and file the above application,that he has read the foregoing application and knows the contents 1 thereof,and,that all matters therein set forth are true of his own knowledge,and that he does hereby certify that no commission, ,, ;� y ;i'w•«:.;: salary,compensation,reward or recompense will be paid to any person,firm,association,corporation or other legal entity for holding, operating,conducting or assisting in a game or games of BINGO except as otherwise provided by law 1 � S nature 19 g2—/ Subscribed and sworn to before me this " day of k`y Commission Expires April 20,1985 My commission expires -„ 11' l o/�L- : ' Sir atura of Notary P.blic , ` ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY SALES AND USE TAX DIVISION 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 BINGO LICENSE NO 'rr, STATE OF ARIZONA 1 p ) SS COUNTY OF/2y+ �C ) TlT THCLTSCN being of lawful age,upon his oath deposes and says that he will be responsible for the holding, operation and conduct of such Games of Bingo in accordance with the terms of the license and the provisions of Title 5,Chapter 4,Article 2,A R S / (Sign at 'e Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of G`�" � 19��-- My commission expires_ My Commission Expires April 23, 1985 (/ ; Signature of Nin'tary Public Please Print or Type Member's Name 2etty Thompson Address 31 C C ct1110 City, State Zip Apache Junction, Arz. 822C Telephone '%,.�.c ,23 OO SBG t B ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE • BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY 1700 WEST NASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 BINGO LICENSE NO. AFFIDAVIT FOR CALLERS AND ASSISTANTS TO CALLERS , , being of lawful age, upon his/her oath deposes that he/she is a member or new member of : :ET ` i 1' r; ` .A I L and is of good moral character and has not been convicted of a felony. He/she further deposes that being a volunteer, no commission, salary, compensation, reward or recompense of any kind, either directly or indirectly, will be accepted for calling or assisting the caller in the conduct of any game of Bingo. 6:;Z174 Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this l/ day of , 19?L My Cc;ro mission Expres Ape it S, M5 o ary blic CALLERS OR ASSISTANTS PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE: Name: ;:i '..:oL,pso:. Address : 71C ctyl10 NOTE: This is not a Responsible Party Affidavit . City, Zip: arace Junct1cn, A. E. 22C SBG-1-D (DOR-440) p ... ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE E '._:;r BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 BINGO LICENSE NO, AFFIDAVIT FOR CALLERS AND ASSISTANTS TO CALLERS LL IS THOt.PSC.. , being of lawful age, upon his/her oath deposes that he/she is a member or new member of: D SEr;T QU'SE:'. TRAILER PA:i and is of good moral character and has not been convicted of a felony. He/she further deposes that being a volunteer, no commission, salary, compensation, reward or recompense of any kind, either directly or indirectly, will be accepted for calling or assisting the caller in the conduct of any game of Bingo. Ni)\ � ` 1.�li� 'J_.\%1 f,`,'t-'--^'��`--�-r' Signature V Air Subscribed and sworn to before me this /� day of .3 , 14'1— 7 7 iotar blic / CALLERS OR ASSISTANTS PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE: Name: Lewis Thompson Address : 71C A "o Ccitjllo NOTE: This is not a Responsible Party Affidavit . City, Zip: A2ache Junction, Arz. P522C SBG-1-D (DOR-440) ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY SALES AND USE TAX DIVISION 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 BINGO LICENSE NO STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) SS COUNTY OF pis LL'.'IS T O: PSO , being of lawful age,upon his oath deposes and says that he will be responsible for the holding, operation and conduct of such Games of Bingo in accordance with the terms of the license and the provisions of Title 5,Chapter 4,Article 2,A R S (Signature) Subscribed and sworn to before me this Il day of 2,5d7,N. w n 19 0 My commission expires My Commission Expires Ap i 23, 1.�J Signat e of Notary Public Please Print or Type Member's Name Lewis Thompson Address 510 Octillo City, State, Zip Apache Junction 85220 982—250C Telephone SBG 1 B ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: g(--V YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON 17/ COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE V UNANIrOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • .}' . .. .+4.0sf" 4AWOMM .dreaatiiiYc+ac:. ..i15Y.+LueG.-A`;ea.uec i':s.-.✓s:•.n:.�'wrsx^.w..+'r„e-ati.b�.. ...:.. -..: :.:;. .. vR.�niSgY1Nb:WU1.i(S4'zf`Y16{)iirMirieere.s.?giw�aQufs.3w.:a.4.::..x'-",., r.... .,;..... ..,..,. "..,.,,.:w r.,,a"w•:`M..r.. ..a>ru,+G.a..,.e r i?t'i,:1�+ v . , .. _ .. ... .. ITEM NO . 5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY THE DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PARK, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY . FOR APPROVAL !a n,r.i.>•.. f.�s..,; ,.�--�z., ^ti i?r�' -:!',>.L . .. ...... �...k+--*+'.wnn�..,,:�t-Fa;t...rc. --_ .. .. .. • • • • • _ .r•.aaMiw�..rx.+•ra:a�A ?zae+rti.4+e,.k•'.- .....,a.•,.+..ayers;+..:.r.,u�..::���w,r...aru.:.�:'i:ns.�w:'er+w'sr`..+wc:- : . ..,:.-a.�, .. .. .'+3:f=•*. r � .'s:c: ..p.W'%�4�K�MOlw.itGNe5i4:VAi9N" .....�i.atuCM:i;�tO;at:M-..:.::...n.-.,:,.„ -, ....': r .a. sx•Yrs;.�'(MAe%vi i%Avw,.vY+cMfi;vs.?.nrlhilsw. -.,. -... ... • ITEM NO , 5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY THE DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PARK, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR DISAPPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY . FOR DENIAL O� e 4 4 Z �R,zONP amity o� @479ache 09unction MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER edX7L FROM: .4wit) JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM December 2, 1981 Public Hearing and First Reading December 16, 1981 Second Reading and Consideration General Information• Proposed Ordinance No. 120 Rezoning Case No. PZ-20-81 Rezoning Request: General Rural (GR) to Trailer Homesite by Planned Development (TH/PD) Applicant: Jack Tandy Power of Attorney: Date of Application: September 20, 1981 Date of Advertisement: October 25, 1981 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date. November 10, 1981 Area: + 5 acres Application Requirements: Number of Property Owners: 5 Number of Exempt Properties: 2 (with one counting elsewhere) Number of Affected Owners: 4 Number of Signatures• 3 or 75% Signatures by Affected Area: 75% + /J Approver for Agenda C/ Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) • Dale Iten/T Zoning Administrator - See attached memorandum. First Re- g j/5/7: _ J‘- Public Safety - No comment Second 2v `ng 9/on ...6 Director of Public Works - See attached memorandum. ��Old Business ._._ New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 4 .. MEMORANDUM TQ: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL (REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM) Page Two Planning Commission Recommendation: Following the public hearing at the regular meeting of the. Planning and Zoning Commission on November 10, 1981 , the Commission voted 7-1 to recom- mend to the City Council the denial of this application. The reason for the recommendation is as follows• 1 . The Land Use Committee has reviewed substantial data now contained in the various studies for the Apache Junction General Plan and has concluded from the data and has recommended the area north_ of Teepee Street should remain at a density of no more than one dwelling unit per a minimum one-acre lot or parcel . Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum. ) Amok RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 120 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-20-81 , Application of Jack Tandy ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 120 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED _ _.. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR DENIAL OF THIS MOTION ARE. OPTIONAL CHOICES a. Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) #01111IN (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, -- you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) _::.air'AIMC��_a+'"s1�'%�'waitlf.�:i.'.. wr►!'..-r'+NSMilltlil -. s anuta .. .+vn:v�a..+...:e-..,..YP•i'na.4 RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 120 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-20-81 , Application of Jack Tandy ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 120 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, FINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; And Be it further resolved that the plans, letters, stipulations and other documentation submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council are hereby incorporated by reference; And Be it further resolved that the City Council finds that the planned develop- • ment as approved meets or exceeds the general criteria as set forth in Section 33.09 of the Zoning Ordinance; And BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE (A motion to approve would require the City Council to make a statement of reasons supporting approval.) r It a.'aT- >+9✓nrwe Ink ORDINANCE NO. 120 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSI- FICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PRO- VISIONS: PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. ,011.4„ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL 1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as the South % of the Northwest 1 of the Southwest 4 of the Northwest ' of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from General Rural (GR) to Trailer Homesite by Planned Development (TH/ PD); provided that, and subject to, approval by the City Council of the City of Apache Junction of the following a. The subdivision as set forth in the development plan b The street abandonment as set forth in case AB-81-7. 2 The approval of the zoning district classification incorporates by reference, the preliminary approval of the planned development as submitted by the applicant, and the development of the said property shall be in accordance with said planned development and as provided in Ordinance No 33 3. Applicant shall install, at his expense, fire hydrants as per approved plans of the Apache Junction Township Fire Chief for this planned development 4. Applicant shall dedicate for public right-of-way purposes these rights- of-way as shown on the planned development plan 5. Applicant shall install, at his expense, off-site street improvements as set forth on the planned development plans in compliance with de- sign details approved by the Director of Public Works SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this Ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000 or imprisonment for a period of six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache - -»- Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1982. /••• Mayor ATTEST City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney 1 0IN ,.., P Z- 2 0-8 I TA N D Y PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 12O . "R,'v '.`ti�:at`,LiwV4.raYr:q REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR TO TH/PD cc o o cc o o W FOOTHILL ST o J c, - G z z 0 Cr Q 6,0 GR __Il - O Q fi Q 0 T H SUBJECT PROPERTY z I. �--REQUESTED ABANDONMENT z W SMOKETREE ST t../ ow• T H T H G R a..etti_,:..i.< ;a:.c;i A % i4 ::;wm.. N • SCALE I I I 0 300 600 FEET fr APPLICATION FOR AM-VI:EL-NT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA m fiy Cash Receipt No..AmounttnaDatepink,i Case Number P2- 20- TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed)• Parcel 1 From GR To TH - PAD Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 ( The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Sk, NWk, SWk NWk, Section 17, T1N RBE, G&SRB8k1 The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance om nearest mapped street) Approx 4 7 acres, fronting on the East side of Ironwood and approx 650' North of Teepee Street (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under ^ present zoning districting? GR is a General Rural zone (holding classification pending more intensive development allowing 'commercial farming and livestock uses 2. Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer Adjoining property to the South and South West are developed Mobile Home Parks 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the community or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain 4 Other reasons for the subject request The City has a shortage of suitable developed lots for Residential Mobile Homes. Page 1 of 2 pages PIN Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures • Existing property is vacant land prnpnst.d ucP plena art. for 17 lots of approx. 14000 sq ft path degigned for Mobile Homes with individual septic tank systems. Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit same in erson to Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note. The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) _ Jack Tandy P. 0. Box,2316. AgA a 3umction, hz 982-6023 (`arse of applicant or representative) (Address) Phone) (Nave of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name & Address of person to when petition & notices should be mailed) 2applicant Dat "Note. Plans are required when application is filed for following. Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION 00444 Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks. Page 2 of 2 pages • • 9 i3 - ‘0 3 PQACHE ✓G///, y n ,. tstrl,.aY..� 5i1rx. r.zo�P � it o 4ache unction November 5 , 1981 TO : Executive Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission ( � THRU : Director of Public Works FROM: Zoning Administrator JCO RE : PZ 20-81 Jack Tandy Having reviewed Article 33, and discussing this application with staff and the City Attorney, it is our interpretation that Mr. Tandy ' s application is consistent with the intention and purpose of the Planned Development Zoning District as written. His proposal to create a mobile home neighborhood, consisting of 12 - 14 , 000 ± square lots on 5 acres is an upgrading from the minimum of 3 , 000 square feet (permitted for mobile home parks) and 8 ,000 square feet (permitted in mobile home subdivisions) . We find that the proposed development is consistent with the present development in the area ; that , in fact , it sets higher standards and less density than is currently existing in the neighborhood. ,..� It is our interpretation, with concurrence of the City Attorney , that Mr . Tandy can create his planned neighborhood/ mobile home park (7) with rental spaces . It is our interpretation that the 10-acre minimum listed in the base zone does not apply in this particular case . For the aforementioned reasons , we recommend approval of the requested rezoning . 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 '6:7 y o &pache c2u7, ;ion INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: October 16, 1981 TO: Director of Planning THRU: FROM: Director of Public Works ) " SUBJECT: PZ 20-81 (Jack Tandy) Should the commission approve this application; provisions for right-of-way, drainage and offsite improvements would �. be required and should be co-ordinated through the office of the City Engineer. cc- City Engineer Zoning Administrator ,i- eIN , \1 ,8 __ •-= it 1.1 1( \ ii . :....:,.....„,......_ .....=:„. . _,"-..,....,4,_ •Ilr\ 1: .11: l'\ 1. --"I . -ra ' !f . li i I\ 1 k .•.......--.. _ .._ --,,!,,„ I. . 4\r" -Iir k 11.? ',‘-1 ,..••••• , )11;r4— :._______ _--A i II ir 'Cs'-',.3; •k :;.: 's•)1....11/ ,..) lin f- " I III 1 f' IT 4. 7 ' \' ./ i 1-7\.\'---. ' ',. . '•r.1 '...,, , ' '( .1 , iill; 41111 . , I ''-', ...,,, ' • ri , ' . „ 0 7' i T.___ —1 I .‘ 1--IV : i \ , 1 It\ I • * s\ - ,,, ti i,\.;,...- , - .... • -, -...... . , s.....,,,....,...::,.,..„.„...,....—......-...„..,„......... —ii . il ' .i — 'L ''' 1 1, .... . . 1 ' Ls..'-__-J. . IF' , kli . ...._ . tr.. —0 tm 1 \ ' r . . . __._ ili . 11 ___,_ tfe.4 ,\ ... \ , , ; p f ! —11% ,,,•//' i . \\' \ - - - •• ._ ____ . ____ _____ ---- --•- -- - --. .-- --11A • ry I /9- ... ' \ . • .•• ,•..: 1% , \ :h • ,. 4 .,, : . , ‘ • - ,_, ‹; !; . 11 1 • 1 • t / r*;" , :. - . v...., • k •• .+ ‘e , • . ... , ,'' • , „ '7. 1 , . ',.. ;.i • 1 •. I 'r r!„.ii‘l \ , ;,. .31.- i ,_-.--1%. 1L .',.._ ___-_ , . '!_°N '°' 1" , . \__,. . • \ - 441. 7...1... ...........7.__,__._ ...,,___...........,...._ _ 1 . _ , ' t - _ I.. . .. c... \ i :: 1 ij IC' • rn - ..r. .. ,. \ 1 IRA iNcic •• 11 r • - • ''.. •-k \ Vf:, e • \ - vc - • -iv :- 1, 4 \ ,, I i - .- m \.,... . 'e.. , _ . ; -' I ' 11 .-,_,, , l''‘,. 'Nr 11 ,1 it ll ,, ...'d J't1 Al‘k I I I ------.-- — _JIY '', li-----"\'-', -.,-.,-.-.-...•••.,i',..k, - ii - 7'i A "1,; :-••It ,.' • IV" -.— 1. It i -71' -C7- is-, ' ll " • .,. , - A \ ___,, . ••1 1 I ,, i% • \ . - _/r1=I!Lie_ t_e/5____o_5,71 ..\• I I% \. .• . ... ' L . . ...., i .A.co, ... .. „ . 1 .....:. — ,_____. ___ _:____......______ __ ____\:.__ \ 7 —) -72,7 \, -% , 3 - .. -4 ; , --0 , . ) „ _ ,... I 1.• ii (')\)e14‘' 1 . , I 3.''s\N • 11 ..., I •i • 7 -- ) I II , \ ' ii _Ift. N • • go , , ...,,,. _ 11 _ ____-.-- ...:- _ _ ---7......-.:..--"="7:-..-=',..-::...---.=' ..1--- -:=7:- -.-it•-• -"-- .. .......r•-.4e/R•044.../.1.••••••,,R./....Rint, IA / .it.r.Usbrfaokolle . '' ' I . . , • —.„._,..- —.--..........—.._. .. - 1 • . i iikiii •.\ Nitilk:4-. \ . 1.1 .F./.., \I . . \ I . . _ , ... kli ....ei . , it 41. ., 11 , 11 ..... , "LL I ,n• \ \ '.1.1) I I -------"-----— ______ -- ---,----,— — . ;I .i •'4V4C.41-'!-A!,14!*fr:0;2. :*';‘1'1't- ir,rc,,,-,-',rkti2,4.1"..:1';^-A 1 1 . ‘ .\\ k, 11 \ \\•,,z‘, - -----••-— ' 2 • li ' \ V.... ••••• l'''\ •-•-...:-......"7‘; I • I I \ I I . . . t . ) . '.... . 4- ' 4. i' • i;':',.'.:.:::..-:' • ' ' ' . • . , • i . t . 1 . 1 , I I “. I . I It.-'; , .''' -,. t .. . . . , , Of 14 ' ,,--- - ,477,712,,,,./) P/J-7- ,0/,u(Th \'") I-- > I N..ELI-V-1-10± I I -i- 1 0 0' I 0 0 /00' I100 I I/O' • MOO I SEPT, v L E A semi-Air \ 1 1 eel wav: marslIC II :3- .'.'-. I \ RErE, -low i 1A17 Eh . IT— - ------ RIGHT 'OF WAY i......i Lil i „ N\ 0 cl, ek R,4,eig ---1-s-c: - I • ) \ \ ::::\\ \,•t SC . LE ,,4 ‘, • I .i . i ... N , _ N \1/4N`s\ ELIs,, ..,,.. ------ .33 : MINATE3 + \ \ '''') EASEMENTS rq E )LEV.! \\\\ — -5/ilede1777.c94.&---— \ '\ "....,......._ --- ( 1. 1. LETTER OF INTENT: It is our intention setforth herein, as owners of the 5 acre parcel of land described below to rezone said property from the " General Rural" classifica- tion to "TH-PD". In doing so, our purpose is to create an attractive mobile home neighborhood consisting of a maximum of 12 mobile spaces each with a (l minimum size of 14,000 square feet. Included in the development will be the construction of a private road allowing access to each space The roadway will be engineered in such a manner as to include easement space necessary to conform to city requirements regarding surface, curbing, and gutters should it become desirable to make it a dedicated public street at a latter date. As owners and developers, we are fully aware, and in complete understanding of the limitations setforth by legislation governing the current Arizona ground water laws. We intend to remain within these limitations. On rezoning from G.R. to T.H. -P.D. we plan to reside on the site, making it our home. The remainder of the property will be split into large mobile home spaces to be offered on a rental basis, each to conform to the minimum space size as mentioned above. Other restrictions will also apply and be enforced, such as: * doublewide mobiles only * increased setbacks: 20 ft. in front, 15 ft. rear and sides. * 10 ft. front or rear patio with 10 ft. awning. * one mobile per space. * mobiles to be ground level with proper drainage and retention. At some time in the future when, and if the ground water problem has been resolved, we may wish to offer the spaces on a "for sale" basis, thus creating an upgraded mobile home subdivision. In doing so, we feel that a real need will be met in the community and will be a definite asset to the City of Apache Junction. It will offer an attractive alternative to conventional TH living that involves a 3000 sq. ft. space in a congested park, and to the 1k acre requirement in GR zoning, which is often too big and too ei<pen,ive for many of our residents to buy and to keep up. At which time it were possible to create a subdivision, we would, of course, proceed through the proper channels with the Arizona Dept. of Real Estate in conjunction with the City of Apache Junction. HERE AND NOW, HOWEVER, OUR ONLY DESIRE, INTENT, AND REQUEST IS FOR A ZONING CHANGE FROM "GENERAL RURAL TO TRAILER HOMESITE - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. ,."•. We feel the important matters at hand in this request are: 1. We are not attempting to create a mobile home subdivision! 2. We are trying to build a mobile home neighborhood consisting of a maximum of 12 spaces (to be rented) located in an area where adjacent properties are currently offering as much as 46 spaces per 5 acres. 3. We are acting under advisement of the City consultant who is recommending future lots in our community should -be min* - 10,500 sq. ft. in size. 4 The excessive deed restrictions we have included whether in a rental situation or in a future mobile subdivision. 5. The property itself lies in a transition area and is conducive to this kind of development. Apache Trail north to University: high density commercial and residential University (Superstition) north to property site: High density mobile parks Property site north: Some mobile parks but generally GR. 2. 2. ACCURATE MAP: A. Boundry site, dimension site, north arrow, and scale. See attached map #1 B. Streets, alleys, and easements (contiguous & within) . West: Ironwood Rd. - 66' wide with 50 ' easement South: Smoketree Rd. - 66' with 33' easem4,1t. (To be abandoned) East. Gold Rd, - 66' with 33' easement. (To be abandoned) Proposed within -50' easement to include a 32' wide private road with a cul de sac at east end with a 40' radius. 3. MAP SCHEMATIC REFERENCE TO: A. General public and private uses. Street is to be a private roadway. See attached map and diagram #2. B. Location, dimension, direction of physiographic features. Site is located on east side of Ironwood Rd. 3/4 mile north of Hwy. 60. C. Private right of way proposed. See map and diagram #2. Each space will have own private driveway. D. Location of proposed structures. See map and diagram #2. May vary but will always conform to minimum space size and restrictions that correspond. E. Common open space. Does not apply. F. Flood hazard areas. Does not apply. See flood prone map #3. 4. STATEMENTS A. Property ownerships including easements See attached ownership list and refer to map #1. B. Water supply Property owner to provide water to 5 acres via Arizona Water Co. and, in turn, to each potential rental space. C. Sewerage Individual septic tanks to be provided to each space by owner. D. Drainage Each space graded to allow for adaquate retention. Private street to be engineered for proper drainage. eN f I 1 Number and type of units proposed Potential is for a maximum of 12 large spaces with a minimum of 14000 sq. ft. each. Restricted to one doublewide mobile per space 1 C5. NO'N! RESIDLNTIAl. USLS Does not apply. 6. PRELIMINARY A. Vehicle circulation Proposed street to be adaquate for ingress and egress. See attached map and diagram #2. B. Pedistrian circulation (sidewalks) Does not apply. C. Parking and loading Each space to have own driveway with sufficient parking. See map and diagram #2. D. Emergency vehicle access Proposed street as shown on map and diagram #2 conforms to city requirements regarding emergency vehicle access ( 7. STRUCTURES A. Dimensions Mobile home sizes may vary but 24 ft. width is required. B. Entrances Each space to have own private driveway C. Relations to other units, streets, and open areas. All mobiles to face proposed private road. eIN Setback m3 nimums. Front. 20 ft. Rear: 15 ft Sides* 15 ft. All setbacks are in excess of cith requirements. 8 AD DACE f(T AREAS WITHIN 400 FT Lntire area of this quartersection consists primarily of level desert, free from any major washes. West 5 acres undeveloped, zoned mobile home park. South,.est 5 acres undeveloped; zoned mobile home park South 5 acres: developed mobile park (Andersons Big A Park) continued N 4. Southeast 5 acres: undeveloped general rural , but potential M H as it is owned by Anderson and is contiguous to his existing Park. East 5 acres. undeveloped general rural. Also owned by Anderson and is contiguous. C Northeast 5 acres' undeveloped general rural. North 5 acres: developed general rural with 2 mobile residences Northwest 2`, acres' developed general rural with residence. B. Landscaping plans including fences and walls. Landscaping to be at the discretion of each tenant renting a space. As developers, we plan to fence the entire 5 acre parcel. Tentative plans are for a concrete block wall. C. Maintenance provisions' Each space will be the responsibility of residing tenant. Fence, road, and easements, as well as the overall appearance of the development will be the responsibility of the owners. 9. CONTOUR INFORMATION A. Bench mark. To be submitted following rezoning and prior to any construction. B. Elevations. • Same as above. C. Cross sections grade and building heights. Same as above. D. General provisions utilities All underground. E. General provisions storm drains. Does not apply. F. Storm water run off methods Spaces to be engineered and graded to allow for adaquate storm run off Floor level of each mobile will be at least 12" higher than the surrounding ground level. 10. LAND AREA TABULATION A. Various uses Total sq. ft. of site 217,800 Sq. ft. per space. 10 @ 14,000 (aprox ) 2 @ 18,000 (aprox. ) B. Proposed private road 16,000 (aprox. ) 11. DEVELOPHE;T SCHEDULE A. Initial construction On approval of zoning �► .. 5. B. Stages 1. Rough grading 2. Underground utilities 3. Final grading 4. Road construction 5. Personal residence C. Renderings Does not apply D. Covenants, draft. Property to contain the following deed restrictions on rezoning. 1. Each space to have minimum of 14,000 sq. ft. 2. Double wide mobiles only. 3. Each unit to be ground level. 4. Each mobile to have a front or rear patio min. 10' wide with awning 5. Increased setbacks. 20' front; 15' rear and sides. 6. One mobile dwelling per space. 7. Each space to kept in orderly condition; free from trash, debris, autos not in working order, etc. E. Lighting plan None provided. CF. Subdivision intention DOES NOT APPLY AT THIS TIME. THIS IS NOT A SUBDIVISION 12. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W Z, S1, NW Z, SW4i NW-'r., Sec. 17 T-IN, R-8E E zi S1/2, NWT, SW'�„ NWT, Sec. 17 T-1N, R-8E A. Boundry See attached map #1 B. Easements See attached map #1 and map and diagram #2. C. Certification by; County records and maps. Survey to be provided prior to construction. 13. OTHER A. On site retention Total land use: Possible 12 doublewide mobiles at 1200 sq. ft. each. Total: 14,400 sq. ft. (aprox. ) Proposed road: 16,000 sq. ft. Total land coverage. 30,400 sq. ft. (excludes patios, sheds, etc. ) Total land coverage: aprox. 14% of gross property sq. footage. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES .•.. ITEM II MEETING OF 1 MOT I O�J BY: SECONDED BY : _ YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN DAMIAN° COUNCILMAN EID SON COUNCILMAN HUDSON I / COUNCILMA.N SHANKS V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL V /MAYOR CLARKE UNANIP1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM ## _ MEETING OF _ " J MOTION BY : /eft SECONDED BY : rI YES NO ABSTAINED COFf\'CT1MAN FIDSON Cfl1 MCI MAN HUD SON COIINCII 1\18N SIIANVS COUNCILMAN STEELSMIT. 1 COMIC I I MAN DA.MIANO ✓ VICF MAYOR HII I MAYOR CLARKE ✓ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL r /1'4N ITEM NO . 6 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 120, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 120 FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 120, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-E1 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD) , REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANS, LETTERS, STIPULATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS APPROVED MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE GENERAL CRITERIA AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 33 . 09 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; AND r,ac..r..,,.w*MMt+N�c�wv.;>r.<.d..agcrn�!►i:+geaba.a+Ct.+.krr•t�F..s. ...s.::: _, ., -.:,..�_:�,;+..,,. ..:,.:v►+w«KaE«•a'. .,..,.... ;::..;. ... _ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: (14 THE CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZES THE SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE LAND USE COMMITTEE HAVE MADE IN DEVELOPING INFORMATION FROM WHICH THEY HAVE CONCLUDED A PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY, HOWEVER, IN THIS CASE, THE APPLICATION FOR THE TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD) HAS REQUIRED ADVANCE SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT BY THE APPLICANT WHO, IN GOOD FAITH, PREPARED A COMPLETE APPLICATION WHICH WAS PRESENTED TO THE CITY FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION PRIOR TO THERE BEING COMPLETE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE WHICH ULTIMATELY WAS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE LAND USE COMMITTEE THE DAY PRIOR TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF THIS APPLICATION . IT APPEARS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT IT WOULD BE UNFAIR TO PLACE UPON THIS APPLICANT THE NECESSITY TO CHANGE HIS PLANS WHEN INFORMATION HAD NOT BEEN AVAILABLE , (2) THE CITY COUNCIL TAKES NOTE THAT THE APPLICATION PROPOSED, WITH THE LOCAL STREETS NOW ABANDONED, WOULD HAVE MINIMUM LOT SIZES APPROXIMATELY 14,000 SQUARE FEET WHICH IS SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER THAN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE AS REQUIRED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND WHICH, IS LARGER THAN THE MINIMUM 10,000 SQUARE FEET WHICH WOULD BE THE MINIMUM SIZE OF LOTS PROPOSED IN MOST OF THE COMMUNITY BY THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN . (3) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES HAVE FRONTAGE AND, THEREFORE, ACCESS ON IRONWOOD DRIVE WHICH WOULD GIVE ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR THE MOVEMENT OF MOBILE UNITS IN THE AREA AND SHOULD BE ABLE TO HANDLE ANY TRAFFIC WHICH MAY BE GENERATED , FOR APPROVAL ":� '. '.'.::.AY�.'zicw's-.1i`W n. ",aa..•f ..?.,.r a,:,ti,.��.. ..�._,pr'ti .:.a........,. . - - ..i.Fix.�:h►t.vw:a. ra '.mot .o y�r r ITEM NO , 6 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 120, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Sj- 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 120 FOR THE SECOND READING , Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 120, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMEISTE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD) , REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR DENIAL OF THIS MOTION ARE : A , "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE . " B . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS . IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK. ) FOR DENIAL p January 18, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO• THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM• VINTON PECK SUBJECT: WITHDRAWAL OF REZONING APPLICATION (PZ-21-81 ) This is to request my rezoning application, PZ-21-81 , be withdrawn without prejudice. r F~ /w • ... ..'y . .-.� ..a..cw. 9P4+FM.n.Ww�+ls;'7•'' '1.:iW71�' In;:. ] r."'�';7i- "�,.. ..-'E>. .:i1a:..�y(q`ll. i ,.. ' '...'Mfa!Cer': �� dJI:S `..:'f S.e .e'n. - .;;. _AIMx:.. >'aUSiKr� • -.. .. A:..,.... .:.7........-.v.....er.. ..�..:ti..:�r.�....sr...,..-+4a+�r���� �v��:i..->�w.,.�s+:.c+ai.-... .............. ... ""':....... .. .... _. ... ,_ ..W..:;._... ,.x. _ .. ._ • • • . fii+nca-ah� C:,M$e .'Yr3�+.`: .o61Rww,lfa . . Al I\ --r7s:l✓`, u.iale:.e?�.:i�rsv,r: "'!4r 'Mk4:i�Aw-�.�rH�FidfiNSYKV'aM,R�" •hY`a:`iVYt:+ofiirhGere �xvci!W'.tU�MC+'.r-:',4.ztr•.ti�e>r. - /.116.. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT REZONING CASE PZ-21-81, ALSO KNOWN AS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO . 121, APPLICATION OF VINTON PECK, BE AND HEREBY IS, IS ACCEPTED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE . ISilkCHF ar: A/P/ZONP COity o, 04pache 09unction December 10, 1981 MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER Ar*/ FROM : JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING - JANUARY 5, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION - JANUARY 19, 1982 General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 121 Rezoning Case No. PZ-21-81 Rezoning Request: General Rural (GR) to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone Applicant: Vinton Peck Power of Attorney. N/A - Date of Application: September 25, 1981 Date of Advertisement. October 25, 1981 (P&Z) December 16, 1981 (City Council ) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: November 10, 1981 and December 8, 1981 Area. 0.6 acres, or 25,902 square feet Dwelling units permitted = 13+ Application Requirements: (Not applicable - Commission Initiative) Number of Property Owners: Number of Exempt Properties' Approver for Agenda Number of Affected Owners: --- Number of Signatures. pale/ Item # Signatures by Affected Area: F'zt /a" 7cP 7 Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) • ..{,AFL'.,,; 1 icaric Zoning Administrator - no comment ..✓G:J y,;,.ness Department of Public Safety - no comment haw 3us,re,: Department of Public Works - See attached memorandum. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Adl,. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM (PECK) December 10, 1981 Page Two Comment by Petition/Letter: (See Zoning Ordinance Section 2807) Attached - one petition and one letter Fourteen of seventeen property owners within the 300-foot limit have signed a petition in protest of this proposed rezoning. Therefore, this application cannot be rezoned except by the unanimous vote of the City Council . (Exceptions may be made for members with conflict of interest, if any. ) Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of rezoning case no. PZ-21-81 , also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 121 , application of Vinton Peck, seeking to rezone from General Rural (GR) to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone for his property as described in the application. The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 ) By the petitions submitted, it appears the neighborhood is opposed to multiple dwellings in the area; 2) Multiple dwellings on these lots could substantially raise the density in this area beyond that characteristic of current de- velopment. Recommended Motion. (See attached memorandum. ) JWG:rin RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 121 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-21-81 , application of Vinton Peck ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 121 , ------- - AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- " NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-21-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference b. (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) OR c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, — - you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) .00k oink ORDINANCE NO. 121 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-21-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as• Lots 27 and 28, Superstition Homes Subdivision located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classifica- tion from General Rural (GR) to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone. SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this Ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000 or imprisonment for a period of six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense pun- ishable as hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Mayor ATTEST City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM• _.w,...._...,..�,.�..,.,._..,........_._ ,�..___ .., City,Attorney PZ - 2I - 8I PECK PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 121 REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR TO CR-5 SCALE I 1 0 120 240 FEET / G R ec O IT H/PD G R co Q t oSPROPERTY UBJECT G R N /2?5/' omis 4-50' W BROADWAY AVE a , , crIli II c, Q o 0 Q Q cn Ix c • APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Cash Receipt No %// Amount (e('66ate'/-J5Case Number 1P Z— 2(- kf TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed) Parcel 1 Fran G.R. To C.R.5 Parcel 2 G.R C R.5 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Lot 27 & 28 Superstition Homes Addition • The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance from nearest mapped street)• 0.6 Acres . East side of saguaro, 200 ft. north of Broadway (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting? Proximity of Elementary School makes Singles _ Family Residential less than desirable. 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer. ;w.._:,,ya Yes. School has tremendously increased. 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the corm-unity or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain 4 Other reasons for the subject request It is thought that soma elementary school teachers will see these apts. an aPairahle Page 1 of 2 pages • ..� <-, �-.�.. M • Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures Existing. Land is undeveloped. Proposed. One 4-plex per lot. — r Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit same in erson to Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) - - Vinton & Barbara Peck 1000 W. Apache Apache Jct. 982-3040 (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) i'(,2 I /oao cc.) jf-nc/,e 72, 1-Z.,/e /o�/ /7�s! _I"S tam. (Name & Address of person to whom petition & notices should be mailed) "2/14 4-c, (Signature of applicant) ,S' � � ) (Date) *Note. Plans are required when application is filed for following Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks Page 2 of 2 pages &4pache 09uncizowia INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: October 14, 1981 TO: Director of Planning THRU: FROM: Director of Public Works i SUBJECT: PZ 21-81 Should the commission approve the application; provisions for drainage and offsite improvements would be required and should be coordinated through the office of the City Engineer. cc: City Engineer • Zoning Administrator RWB/lt • 1, t. .„ ® . /75/s - 7[/, / )..6' , 'L ` Vic% < t---�2/ / r 2 - ate,-��.�- ::.L7 y ; �.�/ / i<� .; •�9✓// r i1�r 2 -rw PETITION IN OBJECTION TO REZONE y ,sr) 7-w i,-.: al We, the unaersigned owners of property surrounding that legally described property wherin the zone channe is being requested, TO WIT: From Gere-al nur .1 to C 4-5 ' t'' ti-F t" lit Dwcllinr: LOCATIO:': 687 and 721 S Saguaro, An,v"t c Jct. , Az L':GAL: Lots 27 . z. 28 Su' :stit' . ' omcs Sub-,)ivi:ion Final County, Az Apache Jet. do at this time (date next to signature on oc, ition) Object to the nrpposil, any prior Non-Objt,ctian by us in a prior petition is hf•reby voided after _ - careful re-consideration. SIGNATURE STREET ADDRESS DATE BOOK PAGE.-PARCEL • a 6,/� S c�4c- WS/s/ /o f o Y b 6,7 J S 6/ -57 ate^ // /�/ /0/ 07 067 S 0, L., Lo Q., : . . . U,, t, 'i 11101 col 01_ 06 9 g,1z/4 S, ;,e,t,:e, de• i/-/ Y/ //NV 1D) _129 0661 6�a ,S' ��n/) //1-c�/ / % °1 04 / (i.r-'r 1 7`4. L.,Y�/ r; / .-..,_ . , /1 y /o/ 0 1 0 7`j � `q Qi �� II it--9 - dI 02. -1 l_ 01 :..: t. y -- x 17 3 y w 9 A v_e�_ _L/- - -g( /O, -12-07/ -.,,-,: .,-'.,.:7,::::::a-,--' 7- -...,L;,:::- ' g.v.,,,,,t_____,___6(2,„„....„.„.4,-::_. il 0 7 1.4d ie 04., . , . , ci 'le,/ -0 Joi, 4,yi VC --- .4x, . / ,4_,._ 6_,0 b " C",.„, // yd.)/ to/ o y ot2 .4 03"" /3e/ --='y,J / T jwutsCre ,, _0,-, �..tC� �r X-\ \ -,:l. ;Y.� -,C it -to `e1 ,/6.2 -/.2 - oCo? Yr e-41,,/,�//,, >7,76 i -? -, ;;' 4k42.-- //. / 0,i /0.2 - /2 -a �t l / . z - - id i/j fo1 -/Z -073 F,S., / 7 /O7 -0? -0 7 .4::.;.. : • 1 //-/a- 5'./ /0/-o7-071 "...Le( dj- -) (/sue) —<(a. .c�.-1,0 ,lT).J /1 ./a-1'r /o/--);,r d 7v _O /' A' Y ,/( S ru TURE OF PERSON C • .LATIfdGPETITION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF FINAL ss id On the /�, dal ofAve4-,-/e,- ,1981, personally appeared before me ,c —_ pi- , who upon oath deposes and says that he is the �•^ -� -y� ---- person who circu aged the foregoing petition and that to the best of his knowledge and belief tine signatures contained therein are those of real c - � . =' property owners within 300 feet from the exterior bounaaries of the legally . . i,` rc described property wherein the chan of districts ix Ving,requested. I / i .7 /%. ' ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ' 7/KD )1/ CT,JrAF ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : 4,„ SECONDED BY : YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR HILL _ MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"",OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL . . ��+LlbtYEfv'eA+itaa_t'!-..{'O`:.{tr. ifY '.:^^• rY_'t..ra':irili.d.S c.t1_<.L':JN tfa«.Tv:v_a*ivn ..l.Y..•--i .i. : - ITEM NO . 7 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO . 121, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE. This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry, if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 121 FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 121, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-21-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . FOR APPROVAL ^w�:+a-;.:rMiw^iMcwGti::'tiLt.V�<n,, er1 1`c S.s,:sv`a: -.�.r .,�t3:t. _. .c.:. .. �ts:.,..�.r.na..��.+4d=!ti'nem:..t•+;:i.ns..+.�. . .-, - ... - .. �. _. Imo► • .vYil�di4.. ... .xr+CaSat�!M1 _ ,tl'�Av.ww:t.. . 'xlklt�e.w.r�+".""i.�d' 3k.:re^t._ r.a •f 33.. .3: ITEM NO , 7 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 121, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE. This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 121 FOR THE SECOND READING , st, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 121, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-21-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED . FOR DENIAL ..... ,.... ,,,_ PQACHFF ,„,,,, ,,:.,,„ ,,,,,, . ,,.. ,„ „, 0 ,. .,.,,. .,,_,. ..:.: Ali? /ZOXAP COity o 04pache oQunction ... December 12, 1981 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ?� THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER1 / /. FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING �-E L' SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING - JANUARY 5, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION - JANUARY 19, 1982 General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 125 Rezoning Case No. PZ-22-81 Rezoning Request: Trailer Homesite (TH) to General Rural (GR) Applicant: Dorothy Yoder Power of Attorney: Frank Talbott •p• Date of Application: October 9, 1981 Date of Advertisement: November 22, 1981 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: December 8, 1981 Area: 5 acres, including any easements Application Requirements: Number of Property Owners: 17 Number of Exempt Properties: 17 Number of Affected Owners: 0 Number of Signatures• 0 Signatures by Affected Area: 0 Approver for A,enda Al----. ti Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) . C,,yy Item # Department of Public Safety - no comment r„tt p., : .g I -�/�, ..... _•-_4 Department of Public Works - no objection 5ocol,iI,-, !in ,it ...!_c� q. Zoning Administrator - See attached memorandum. i !:c Hciring t. Old Business �:,,,-. ?dap► Business {: 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM December 12, 1981 Page Two Comment by Petition/Letters: None Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: --� The Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of rezoning case no. PZ-22-81 , also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 121 , application of Dorothy Yoder, seeking to rezone from Trailer Homesite (TH) to General Rural (GR) her property as described in the application. The reasons for the recommendation are: 1 ) The applicant desires to maintain horses on the premises. Horses are in the area and, further, the lot would be large enough to meet minimum health standards. 2) The zone would be low density and would create openness in the area. Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum. ) PQP,CHEG µ,—tea"• 1, 'qR/ZONP it?y o� (94pache 09unction November 24 , 1981 TO: Executive Secretary, Planning & Zoning� Commission THRU : Director of Public Works f 'j-, .Y /4; 7 244',„„ FROM: Zoning Administrator RE : PZ-22-81 Yoder The applicant ' s requested rezoning appears to be consistent with the proposed General Plan in that the request , if granted, would limit development to 4 units on the 5 acre parcel. With the present zoning the owners could conceivably develop 27 units on the 5 acres . It is possible that the applicant ' s proposed use could generate complaints from adjoining property owners if the horse facilities are not properly located . We recommend that the commission consider approval possibly with the stipulation that the horses be located in a specified area . For commission ' s information it is our Auk understanding that the Pinal County Health Department re- gulations require that horse facilities be located not less than 100 ' from surrounding residences, which should pose no problems considering the size of the applicant ' s property . LF: llo 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 0,11. Auk RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 125 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-22-81 , application of Dorthy Yoder ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 125 , -- AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERAL RURAL (GR), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILTIY, AND PRO- VIDING FOR PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED _ _ .. __ . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a. Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) Ask Ass. ORDINANCE NO 125 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSI- FICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERAL RURAL (GR), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVER- ABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT: SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as the West % of the Northwest 1 of the Northeast 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from Trailer Homesite (TH) to General Rural (GR). SECTION II REPEALING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS - - All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference is, for any reasons, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the vali- dity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this Ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000 or imprisonment for a period of six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1982 ...-...�:�:::�,.:.:. ..<.v..,•-;;ems Mayor ATTEST City Clerk APPRO D AS TO FORM: . 1 . /4/11,A, Ci y Attorney PZ-22-81 (YODER) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 125 •: „-a yo. `,� `y':nx• w=N-�-j REQUESTED REZONING FROM ,.. ,. TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO •"lk GENERAL RURAL (GR) 0 ri L a n � 3 3 U Lt..1 ._ .._.._._._' _.._._. .. .... C C W Ce W W < L N —1 Q L W .. ) 3 C C TH W. 16th AVE J W r TH 1 cc N CR-3 W n. mcc TH L. N SCALE I a 1 0 400 800 FEET OWN OWN • APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF TIE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES • FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Cash Receipt No Cq//JAmounto D�te�C��Case Number Pi-ZZ- c-/ TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNC I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as Follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel - ^Y numbers if rare than one change of zoning is proposed) Parcel 1 Fran ►-I-i To• L /?/\L- Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal descriptic-i of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if -c=e space is needed, attach separate sheet) t, / AI vt/ v/ Al �; S w' y S E c 3 0 Y/A/ R c C� C q Sit1341-1 The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject prcaerzv is as follows (give direction & distance ran nearest mapped street). Ac,ce:y CA! 5 S ")i Gr /C (24AVA 6c TiJEE&I !v'ARrJE-Q ,), '1 LAWScti' DA', (Please answer the follc•,rg questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed.) 1. Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting? P p 5 i T Y 15 i ei /I I(-1/ A TNt? , 01111 APE ti.G, I--I RSA. PP iv0ll_[6/S x 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer No _-_,�T__ _ 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the ca n nlity or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain h'/A 4 Other reasons for the subject request Page 1 of 2 pages Ais Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures ExrsTruG OSE — NoA/ , dacAu7 y,4Np, pRoeosED - MO(31LE Ho E AP)D CORRAL FOR I/�d2SE5 on/ SOCITI/ A ©, S of3 Sc-r ?RoPtRTY /1, Attach any sunporting information, statements or plans` to this application & submit same in person to. Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona (Note The land owner(s) must sign belay or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) FRAPJK TA Leo-IT- 333 w, iAPACHE' 72 A T 982-$'220 (Naue of applicant or representative) ' (Address) (Phone) (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) FleAuK T,4L13oT Po IBOXIIll ,q T. Az . 85 zo (Name & Address of person to whan'petition & notices should be mailed) .:.; 41.41•; v �i1/ -30 / l� -b, ( ignature o ph t) (Date) -:Note Plans are required when application is filed for following Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Inas- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case - Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks. Page 2 of 2 pages c ; Z' 4. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES _ I 6JA/ jf6}L ITEM II MEETING OF MOTION BY: ti k SECONDED BY: � YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS ://///:( COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON , 1:7 VICE MAYOR HILL w MAYOR CLARKE % UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM /I - MEETING OF MOTION BY: B SECONDED Y :N . OIS YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON V / COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMIT V VICE MAYOR HILL /f MAYOR CLARKE v UNANIMO IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL A. ... - _ .:. . --. -,::•- ;. ..:;...:r:oarmir.;iv sx.....-.a.^-`-s-`e`;r.+{+<^'.:#.,r�";r wi ITEM NO , 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO . 125, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 125 FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 125, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERAL RURAL (GR) , REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS; "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION --, WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. " B . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS , IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE. IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK. ) FOR APPROVAL "tl ;ytx *Ryr. s.ars . ..• t. s:,:, mom, ,.� ._ .s . JT.+' .•Ar'.'n]e+.s.✓t34.:wFw .Mu,�.".. '.k...-e+.L��..Y 3+-:+-. ;.-:.. -:r-. >.. -'J`'a . a. _ .. . • ,0114, • • •R ."Yt..Mrr�H :�+Asascveazs+r�•ss.�ma;Me+,=a#Saavw,3�»a*cnwar:sere.�:as •'svA�.r&:.WtSx...,s Sier+a•rr.+rk.zf+Kvc,Aan.�:+t ,. :;.:,„ ... .:)- - - .. _ :'.' -.:,,;.*.r ITEM NO . 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO . 125, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE• This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 125 FOR THE SECOND READING , StE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 125, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERAL RURAL (GR) , REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED . FOR DENIAL HE L G O -aOPkC ti0 w '9R/ZONP VDit j o c944ac/ie c2unction .. January 12, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO• THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. MANAGERCITY DIRECTOROFPUBLIC WORKS ._ FROM. COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT. BLM APPLICATION During the Regular Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission on December 28, 1981, the Commission unanimously approved the application and proposed development Alan to be submitted to the Bureau of Land Management as required under the Recreation and Public Purpose Act . The Commission highly reconuuends your approval of this application and nlan. ode JEFF BELL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT JB/ss Approver for Agenda ..6-, ..•....._... Data item # First Ree4ing ..link?" _ 9 Second Re./ding Public Hearing . '<Old Business New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Am* Amok `( psAC,"E✓i, r y;'L 4 U °,sRr -'l li;'a it- Z O` 419/ZONP `6'ity o Cpache &unction January 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER j ,._l FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REPORT OF PROPOSED PARK DEVELOPMENT At the regular meeting of the city Planning and Zoning Commission, Tuesday, January 12, 1982, a recommendation to the City Council for approval of the proposed city park development plan was concluded. As part of the motion, the area designated "Equine Camping" was amended to "Camping" in bold lettering with "Rodeo" in smaller print beneath. This change was to indicate that the area would be used for horse set-up camping during the rodeo season, but was not limited to equine camping, especially in the off-season. JWG-rin xc• City Manager Director of Public Works Parks and Recreation Commission Superintendent of Parks 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ......... ,....., WILLDAN ASSOCIATES El L-iNir'\\i'Ll-LIS, /^- RC'r-1 TEC.1,'D- ,4 i-'J__'---I J ,L---1.--< -.)' I- I - • .---- -- - ......., • •-- .4 '-'•4-.4••.--,.-.•: .- --- -• . •"-"--,4:4.4*:,-;.;14,4/`;.),1,t4,"•';',:tlit.-..--:-.'!...":4-'.;:;r:.7...--72;..,-,:,,',.'."...;4-,f,',.€:.41 . • . .) . , , . - . . . , .. 4 -4 .- • • , . . .- • . , - ..., . . . . . ,... , . . . ' , • , ' ••' • , - •. • , ;., .,. --, .• , - ... . . .,. ., , . . , ,, . .. . , . . .. , . • . . „ . ., . . •. , ,....."': - . " • "'"" - ,' ' • ,' , . .-..• . ' '' ,." :: - •'-' •' . . . • • . • - ' . . . ' , ' ' .-. . . . t . . , . .... -.• .. . ' ," . " ,.. ,. . , .,,. ... . ..... , • t ' .. ' . ' ' .. . . ., - , ', , r • , . ,• , . , . ' . ' . . 4. ',-... . , , • .... . . . . . ' . . ... 1 ' ' . • ,.. ...: . ' .. .. '. ' . '. t ,'' '. • . , .... . ' " . . -,. . . . , :, ' .. . . . ' .., :` .' '• .. . ... . , ' : '. . ..%. .'' ' ' , , ' ' . , , . , • , ' ,` . . . . .... , . , ' , ...., . . . .' " •'- . , , y. , 2 • . ' . .. ' .... , „ .. . . • ,. _• . . , • ' ' .. ' ' . , . , . ' ' ' ' . „ 4 , 4 , „ , • •I 4 . • '• , • , . CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Park Development Plan and Bureau of Land Management LEASE APPLICATION Prepared by WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 1550 East Meadowbrook Phoenix, Arizona 85014 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT PETITION FOR CLASSIFICATION A PETITION TO CLASSIFY AND OPEN PUBLIC LANDS TO ENTRY OR OTHERWISE TO MAKE THEM AVAILABLE FOR DISPOSITION NOTICE TO PETITIONER--APPLICANT Your application (which must be attached hereto) which he has established under that authority, are de- requests the Secretary of the Interior to take an action scribed in the regulation 43 CFR 2410, 2430, and 2450. that is entirely within his discretion. The basis for the A copy of these regulations can be secured from any Secretary's authority and the policies and procedures land office of the Bureau of Land Management. PETITION I HEREBY PETITION The Secretary of the Interior to I understand that if the Authorized Officer of the Bureau have the lands described in the attached application of Land Management does not make the lands avail- classified or otherwise made available for entry or able for disposition pursuant to my application, the reg- disposition pursuant to my application ulations (43 CFR 2450) are applicable to my case. (Date) (Signature of Petitioner--Applicant) coo 838-534 Form 2400-7 (October 1971) UNITED STATES FORM APPROVED DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OMB No 42—R1223 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Date Time Received APPLICATION FOR LAND FOR RECREATION OR PUBLIC PURPOSES Serial Number (Act of June 14, 1926, as amended, 43 U S C 869, 869-4) Applicant's name and address (include zip code) City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road P . 0. Box K Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 2 Give legal description of lands applied for (include metes and bounds description, if necessary) SUBDIVISION SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MERIDIAN See attached sheet 1 N . 8 E . Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian County of P 1 n a 1 State of Arizona Containing 276 acres year ease with an optior 3a. This application is for LJ Lease [ I Purchase (1/Lease, indicate years for e x t do s i o n or purchase b. Proposed use is I xl Public Recreation Li Other Public Purposes (If Other Public Purposes, specify) Proposed Community Park 4 Are three copies of the statement required by 43 CFR 2741 3 attached' Lx] Yes No 5. If applicant is State or policital subdivision thereof, cite your statutory or other authority to hold land for these purposes State of Arizona City of Apache Junction, Resolution Number 81-15 ,Revlsed Statutes 6. Have you attached a copy of your authority for filing this application and to perform all acts incident thereto' - DTI Yes I I No 7 Have you enclosed the required $10 nonrefundable filing fee? Lxi Yes Li No 8 If land described in this application has not been classified for recreation and/or public purposes pursuant to the Recreation and Public Purposes Act, consider this application as a petition for such classification (Signature of Applicant or A, thorized Officer) Acting City Manager (Date) (Title) Title 18 U S C Section 1001, makes it a crime for any person knowingly and willfully to make to any department or agency of the United States any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations as to any matter within its jurisdiction Form 2740-1 (January 1978) S . 1/2 of the S .E . 1/4 of the N .E . 1/4 of Sect . 9 , and the S . 1/2 of said Sect . 9 except that portion described as follows - beginning at the S .W . corner of said Sect . 9 and proceeding N. along the W. line of said Sect . 9 a distance of 2027 . 59 ' , thence S . 50° 23 ' 22" E . 3180 . 19 ' to the S . line of said Sect . , thence W . along said S . line 2450 ' to the S .W. corner of said Sect . 9 . AIM Form 1140-5 UNITED STATES(September 1977) OFORM MB NO APPROVED VED DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT TITLE VI CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 GENERAL Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that no application for Federal financial assistance to the Bureau person in the United States shall, on grounds of race, color, or Office granting the assistance. It need not be submitted or national origin, be excluded from participating in, denied with amendatory applications unless requested by the Bureau the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under any or Office However, a Compliance Report must accompany program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance every initial application for Federal assistance under any authorizing law This Compliance Report must be submitted with the initial 1. Name and address of recipient. 2 Name, address, and title of person responsible for carrying out program City of Apache Junction William McDaniel 1001 North Idaho Road Acting City Manager P. 0. Box K City of Apache Junction Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 1001 North Idaho Road P . 0 . Box K Apache Junction , Arizona 85220 3 Brief statement of purpose of grant To allow for development of a community park for the City of Apache Junction. 4 What plans do you now have or will have to inform employees, participants, beneficiaries, and the general public about the requirements of Title VI and that your programs are operating free from discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin' Explain. The City of Apache Junction Community Services Branch of the Department of Public Works has the responsibility to provide multifaceted leisure and social services appealing and accessible to all citizens . Program activities include promoting communication between the Community Services Department and the citizens it serves in order to meet their needs and desires . This includes announcements through the public media to inform, and random surveys of the general public to assess leisure needs and dociroc . 5. Are all activities, facilities, services, financial aid, or other benefits, included in your Federal assistance pro- grams, provided without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin' f] Yes [] No (If "no," describe the situation or activity and your plans for achieving compliance ) Alm 6 Have you received any complaints regarding Title VP L Yes j x!No (II "yes," explain the nature of the com- plaint and action you are taking ) 7 Do you utilize advisory committees in your programs rxi Yes Ti No (If "yes," list total number of members and number of members who are Negro, Spanish-American, American-Indian, or Oriental ) Nine members , all Anglo-American (Signature of Authorized Official) (Date) William McDaniel Acting City Manager (Type Name) (Type Title) Title 18 U S C Section 1001, makes it a crime for any person knowingly and willfully to make to any department or agency of the United States any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representation as to any matter within its jurisdiction Compliance report is r i Approved Li Disapproved (Signature of Authorized Officer) (Date) PROPOSED PARK DEVELOPMENT City of Apache Junction Site Location The proposed park is located approximately one and one-half miles north of the main business district of the City of Apache Junction in the northernmost portion of Pinal County, Arizona (see Location Map). The park is easily accessible on the west by Idaho Road, and in the future the park may be accessed by the proposed Tomahawk Road and Lost Dutchman Boulevard east and south of the site, respectively. The entire parcel is currently owned in fee title and managed by the Bureau of Land Management. The following legal description applies: "the south half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9, Township I North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, and the south half of said Section 9, except that portion described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 9 and proceeding north along the west line of said Section 9 a distance of 2027.59', thence S50° 23' 22" E 3180.19' to the south line of said section, thence west along said south line 2450' to the southwest corner of said Section 9." Site Description Approximately 276 acres in size, the proposed park is located south of the Tonto National Forest and west of the Superstition Wilderness area. At this time, lands surrounding the site are undeveloped, however, directly contiguous to the site a rodeo park is proposed to the southeast, and a flood control retention basin is proposed to the southwest. Also, southeast of the proposed park site a school development is proposed. Other land uses surrounding the site are proposed for low density residential develop- ment, or to remain undeveloped. The site is in close proximity to the City of Apache Junction and readily accessible to all citizens. Within the central Arizona basin and range climatic and land resource area, the climate of the site is typically very hot in the summer and mild in the winter with precipitation averaging eight to twelve inches per year. The site is dissected by numerous minor drainageways, with these riparian areas dominated by native desert species such as blue ) ) `✓a►,. •a _•.`✓ I . s ` •,.. "ystt y .! r,r•"ti.✓' 1`t { .��y - r' "�, ;? -.ice Y� / (� t x {t • `,, ! c , �„ -pcii :-...::: •--„, ,, 1.1 . .: -/-°'" o c a ,, ,,--1. a c.,, — e' '1, -/' ',..„," % `kl Aa.---4...-c--f,li'lls OUNTA \a t.',. _. \\ t$ a 1 c( ,,, ,„,-- t ,;,4 A, ---,..4.3.1.„,,,,s, / A ..e,-) •el r-‘`,-.?`( . '--,-, 'i>, it/ 't ' ,t,‘"*-;%)/:\\41'W. „., c ''.. 2:: fr /Al" 1'' - '? ..- i tt.r f ! .. ti .IrtT `�`' s ;. � ,, ,A,s , f t , /Ie. vit 9 3 ' ''4X:i f(*11,,,ilrr---4 ;„4'''-' 41-.'-- ...r- -•••,„0••"- ta" •••••1- t 4 .,,,p,,,l', (4 fil, ,),,, ..„........1:, , . `°� li4.? Y ^• %r �Etf .1 "� ��" {• , i� ` �o 4" - r" 2p - INiC� . i tv!9 � outEV,..il.' ,..r.-4---„, ' -c't-'75,Ats,1 ze '''''' A ...,..-J,JIP,,, e , ,-.;:".- Qi;,<1,,v" - v ,)\;---.. iti/.94 -3,-",- • Rp A ..\'1,\i\t'li. 7, -;/,'/ .‘, .,/-'" --..cc... : C'' ' - rr-PN\ s„)ri:7141, flVf..-L:V i ^� 1 '0'1' + ' ,� l' �� .i � �Sr I' ri � i i S,i II �� , ` ' 1A ( n1vj \�,r�1 V i (Y\ i I�17.443. p ,,. tn �, ''ir -tA , rr not 1 . "\t, -,,t -st .. ¢ .: :.y ,: z,0 , ua�ua+ttis fis�'ia�susasa� •�' ` ,, r ,r9. 1/ IA, N r rrl : ' Vile% +1 ., '��{{( I ,.. `:' r+-. ,f���}J�c.�..„ ��-X`�j-�,i '----T --i-- :••,-_-._ •- .,,4 ),.. . ,,,4„,„,,,„..,,,,,,,,,,A,,, „.„,. i ?f,.,:"-q,, /• .-r..w p .:: / .-,„>.....L..... v !. d(�j';, 1 "'y„ ar`I ,rw"''tiy ✓ ,'t tw .r /� y„.a... w--`"`^'". 1..` d..,.xft,:J7 ist -.�... .;• 1 jr (t- f^", 3�` k ia wre '4 �'i°'°' .. .,„42 ,,,.., �. .1 .y........ywC....... 1 «..,"'"�a'nEp 4r (j x�:• ] F�jI ;���^: .. ,rSg . �Sr ... �' ))! p� g� j; tyy �/' �`ii ,++ .jy.� �„ �"�`u. 1•. � y �• A.. r Apa h�� ra� Blvd t A y� I� r141�' �'1 yt ''lfA ,' �. �^ . 2s r w .: r <sF'; „� • '.f ,�s+.�.,„ >.. a, .. ..ragi al k .✓ Im rt 4171,."1,.11t ,.e/j(s"' :K ry�• 5¢yr 7 .t- '1 k i, / 1 e ` J YYY��- tr .J �^ •1= _ J1 1.,�. '�'"7R�.7 A�' l ±i� J (( ..... N 1 1 iii r i1 Y~, PROPOSED PARK I j ' ��� i. �,, LOCATION MAP `��, • �-' J t � �. . . . _ , ' / Ra' —fin Apache Junction, Arizona IiIk. ' •� U c y r 0•nus Outlying Service Area —--— , i r '' -T - = ;. Wdiden Associates • November 1981 • _t t- {', / 1 palo verde, mesquite, burro brush, and desert broom. In the flats along these drainageways other common perennial plant species can be found including creosote- bush, brittlebush, saltbush, bursage, ocotillo, cholla, and saguaro. While the site itself is not unique from others in its desert appearance, site characteristics such as the views afforded of the surrounding mountains, proximity to .... the general populace, and site capability for development make it a desireable location for the City's first community park. Apache Junction Park Needs The City of Apache Junction, incorporated in November of 1978, has three service groups that utilize city facilities. The first group are those persons residing within the city limits. The 1980 population estimate for this group is 10,500 persons. Surrounding the city, a service area with a 1980 population estimate of 2,200 also use city facilities (See Location Map). Estimates by government and private groups show the 1980 figures are a 280 percent increase in population over the last decade (PRC Toups, 1980). Growth projections predict further increases in City and service area population over the next 20 years. In addition to the aforementioned permanent residents, Apache Junction has a very large group of seasonal residents that swelled the population by 17,648 to a final total population for Apache Junction of 30,348 persons in 1980, (PRC Toups). The age distribution of this population follows: Age Percentage 6 & under 12.7 7-14 17. 1 15-19 9.4 20-24 6. 1 25-34 10.7 35-44 10.9 45-54 10.7 55-64 10.5 65-74 8.5 75 and over 3.4 Recognizing that a population of this size and diversity requires many city services and facilities including parks, Apache Junction's Community Services Department's five- year plan identifies a city goal "to provide leisure and social services to meet the community's needs and to administer, organize, plan, and develop parks and recreation facilities for the best interest of Apache Junction today and in the future" (City of Amak oft. Apache Junction, 1980). After a review of the existing and future population, an inventory of available park facilities, and a community needs survey, it was identified that development of the City's first community park was essential. Existing user oriented recreation facilities within the City's service area are minimal. Facilities available include a playground, ballfields, and tennis courts on school district property. These are primarily used by students during school hours and others on nights and weekends. Lighted ballfields are used at capacity levels much of the time. Also within the service area, an existing Pinal County park provides a small playground and a few picnic sites. The City is currently constructing a basketball and volleyball court on property contiguous to the City building complex. Other than these user-oriented recreation facilities, resource oriented recreation opportunities are available outside the City's service area on the Tonto National Forest, Maricopa County's Usery Mountain Park, and the Lost Dutchman State Park. Equestrian trails crisscross the service area. None of the existing facilities or areas provide the opportunity for the City to develop a community park to meet the recreation needs of the community as a whole. A community needs survey, conducted in April of 1980, adds additional input on citizens views on parks development, recreation activities, and participation in specific recrea- tion opportunities. Over 50% of those questioned stated they would use active and passive parks if they were provided. This survey also identified recreation facilities the respondents would utilize if available. These include ball courts, swimming facilities, recreation center, golf course, hiking trails, bicycle paths, horse facilities, playgrounds, and picnic facilities among others. The Apache Junction Parks and Recreation Commission and Community Service staff have developed a recreation plan and set priorities. Operational objectives were developed to further the realization of the City's goal to provide needed leisure services. These include but are not limited to the following: o To increase year-round recreation opportunities. o To provide recreation facilities accessible by all citizens o To pursue alternatives for land acquisition to develop parks. o To provide well-rounded family opportunities to promote family participa- tion. o To provide leisure opportunities to senior citizens. The priorities developed include the provision of recreation facilities and activities. The following lists these priorities by age group and determines immediate and future needs. Present Needs Children Adults Senior Citizens playground horseshoe pits horeshoe pits jogging/bike track shuffleboard shuffleboard basketball courts volleyball (sand) jogging/bike track picnic tables jogging/bike track picnic tables bar-b-que grills basketball courts bar-b-que grills restroom facilities picnic tables restroom facilities archery range bar-b-que grills archery range restroom facilities archery range Future Needs swimming pool swimming pool swimming pool rodeo arena rodeo arena rodeo arena wading pond handball court handball court ramadas racquetball court racquetball court ball fields ramadas ramadas civic center outdoor shoot range outdoor shoot range fountain tennis courts tennis courts amphitheater amphitheater civic center civic center ball fields ball fields golf course golf course (regular/mini) regular/mini) .�. driving range driving range fountain fountain Site Assessment A general site analysis was first conducted to determine the environmental constraints and opportunities of the site before the proposed recreation plan of development was prepared. Limitations to recreation facility locations centered primarily on access possibilities and the threat of flooding in the minor washes dissecting the site. Existing access occurs to the west along Idaho Road, while access is proposed to the east and south. Washes were avoided for locating facilities to prevent damage and increased maintenance costs due to flooding. Slopes in the site area are generally less than 2% presenting few limitations. The site occurs in a transition zone for soils that includes the torrifluvents and mohall-vecant-pinamt soil associations. In the future, more it p detailed soils investigations would need to be conducted for actual facility placement. The opportunities associated with facility locations include those of view, existing evidence of trail use, and the abundance of native vegetation existing on site. From almost all locations on site, views of the surrounding mountains are aesthetically pleasing. Existing trails and evidence of equestrian usage show that the site is currently used for this recreation activity to access trails to the north leading to Usery Mountain Park, Tonto National Forest, and the Superstition Wilderness. The native desert riparian vegetation creates an opportunity for nature trails and botanic areas, while also providing shade and spacial articulation for recreation facilities. After mapping of the constraints and opportunities a development capability assessment was also prepared. In short, this assessment defined general areas as to their potential for locating proposed facility areas. Those areas with abundant vegetation that also experience periodic flooding were slated for preservation. Other locations were designated either potentially developable or restricted. Restricted areas included wash areas with limited vegetation subject to minor periodic flooding. Potentially develop- able lands were primarily the relatively flat outwash areas. Concurrence Concurrence in this project has been obtained from the City of Apache Junction's Mayor and City Council. A copy of Resolution 81-15 expressing City interest is enclosed. RESOLUTION NO. 81-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, EXPRESSING THE CITY INTEREST TO APPLY BY A RECREATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSES APPLICATION FOR CERTAIN BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LANDS CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY LIMITS WHEREAS, the Bureau of Land Management has certain lands con- tiguous to the city of Apache Junction, Arizona, described as: the south half of the southeast of northeast quarter the no t east quarter of Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, and the south half of said Section 9, except that portion described as follows Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 9 and proceeding north along the west line of said Section 9 a distance of 2027.59' , thence S50° 23' 22"E 3180 19' to the south line of said section, thence west along said south line 2450' to the southwest corner of said Section 9,' except the city would defer that portion of the subject area for an approved application by the Apache Junction JayCees; and WHEREAS, the Bureau of Land Management will consider Recreation and Public Purposes Applications for local units of government such as the city of Apache Junction, Arizona, when applicants have legitimate needs for such lands, and WHEREAS, the city of Apache Junction, Arizona, does not at this time have a major recreation park, and WHEREAS, cities should provide recreational facilities acces- - sible to all of its citizens and the subject site is equally accessible to all persons due to location and terrain considerations, and [ WHEREAS, Apache Junction has a western culture and history to which its citizens are expressing a desire to continue such by the ex- pression of their various lifestyles, including their recreational activities, and WHEREAS, there is a need for a variety of recreational facili- ties to serve all age groups and irterest and the subject property would provide an area to serve such an opportunity, and WHEREAS, certain areas are contiguous to proposed flood control areas and certain areas are possibly subject to flooding, therefore, recreational development would provide an orderly transition from the subject flood structures as well as preserve flood-prone areas in open space all in accordance with the goals of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, and w WHEREAS, it is the intention of the city to provide its citizens a balanced recreation program requiring the intensive manage- - - ment upon development of park lands, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the City Council hereby expresses to the Bureau of Land Management, U.S Department of the Interior, its interest and intention to file a Recreation and Public Purposes application for the above described property no later than March 31, 1982, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is directed to review and prepare a recommended application to accomplish the goal of this resolution in a timely manner; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized and directed to send certified copies of the resolution to the Governor of the State, the Arizona State Land Commissioner, the Phoenix District Office of the Bureau of Land Management, and other appropriate officials PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS 19th day of August . 1981 Mayor ATTEST. City rk J APPROVED AS TO FORM !! ,r i l5'f('Lv..C�' Attbrney� j I PROPOSED RECREATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed recreation development plan (see Park Development Plan Map attached) delineates areas for initial development (dark violet) and location for future expansion (pale violet) of recreation facilities. Future expansion areas are not detailed in this application and are only provided to illustrate the potential use of the entire park site. The following describes those areas proposed for the initial five year development plan. Botanic Preserve On entering the proposed park from Idaho Road a botanic preserve is recommended south of the park access road. This area, approximately forty-five acres in size, is to be preserved in its present state with the only proposed improvement a nature trail within the interior, and a jogging trail on the perimeter of the preserve. The nature trail will facilitate the enjoyment of desert fauna and flora and will provide an aesthetic as well as educational recreation experience. The signed trail meandering through the preserve will be a minimum of four feet in width with a natural soil base. Signs will show location and distance of trail at trail head, with smaller signs throughout describing types of vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the area. Parking and support facilities will be provided in conjunction with the picnic area to the east. Cost Estimate .-► Item Cost Site Preparation (3700' x 4') $1 ,361 ,60 Grading (3700' x 4') 952.68 Metal Signing - 2 @ 3' x 3' 200.00 - 20 @ I' x I' 1 ,000.00 Total Cost $3,514.28 Jogging Trail The jogging trail follows the perimeter of the botanic preserve and also expands to a fitness course southeast of the preserve. The entire stretch of the jogging trail and fitness course is approximately 1.6 miles or one kilometer in length. The trail, properly signed, will be four feet wide and composed of natural base materials. The fitness course, approximately 0.5 mile in length, would also be 4 feet wide, composed of r .... natural base material, and have 18 exercise stations. Each station is designed to develop and maintain all the major muscle groups, with signs at each station providing instructions and a description of the exercise to be performed and appropriate repetitions for each level of fitness--beginner, intermediate, and advanced (Mexico Forge, 1981). Parking and support facilities will be provided in conjunction with the picnic area to the north. Cost Estimate Item Cost Site Preparation (8600' x 4') $ 3, 164.80 Grading (8600' x 4') 2,214.33 Metal Signing - 2 @ 3' x 3' 200.00 Fitness Course (18 stations) 8,500.00 Total Cost $14,079. 13 Family Picnic and Playground Area Approximately 0.5 miles east along the proposed park access road from the main park entrance, a family picnic area and playground are proposed abutting the east side of the botanic preserve. The four-acre family picnic area would include 30 individual picnic tables with open areas for free play. Each site would include two concrete picnic tables, one charcoal grill and waste can. Two parking spaces would be provided for each picnic site. The playground would be 0.25 acre, and is located between the family picnic and active sports areas. Cost Estimate Item Cost Site Preparation (4.25 acres) $ 3,378.75 Picnic Sites (15) 16,720.20 Playground 9,824.00 Metal Signing - I @ 3' x 3' 100.00 Roadway Complete (8055.5 s.y.) 46,399.68 (4" A.B.C., chip seal) Parking Complete (I acre) 28,017.79 (4" A.B.C., chip seal) Total Cost $104,440.42 Adak Active Sports The active sports area is located directly east of the playground between and easily accessible to the family and group picnic areas. Approximately three acres in size, the active sports area includes horseshoe pits, shuffleboard, basketball courts, tennis courts, and sand volleyball courts. Parking and support facilities will be provided in conjunction with the picnic areas. Cost Estimate Item Cost Site Preparation (2 acres) $ 1 ,590.00 Grading (1.75 acres) 1 ,029.74 Compaction (1.75 acres) 179.54 Basketball Courts (4) 46,744.00 Tennis Courts (4) 51 ,076.00 Horseshoe Courts (8) 7,592.00 Shuffleboard Courts (8) 22,808.00 Volleyball Courts (4) 7,018.00 Total Cost $138,037.28 Group Picnic Area The group picnic area, located along the proposed park access road east of the active sports area, is approximately three acres in area. The three group picnic sites are designed for use by large groups or clubs. Each group site is located on a one-acre area with six concrete picnic tables protected by a concrete picnic ramada. A group fire ring, a multi-use slab, three charcoal grills and three waste cans are also provided at each group site. Parking (2 spaces per table) and support facilities will be provided in conjunction with the family picnic and active sports areas. Cost Estimate Item Cost Site Preparation (3 acres) $ 2,385.00 Grading (I acre) 584.73 Group Picnic Site (3) 42,853. 14 Metal Signing - 3 @ 3' x 3' 300.00 Total Cost $ 46, 122.87 Archery and Driving Range The driving range is located northeast of the group picnic area, and the archery range is directly east of the driving range. The driving range is approximately 8.5 acres in area, while archery requires approximately 0.75 acres. The driving range would have ten stations 15 feet apart with a 200 yard depth for driving golf balls. The area would be enclosed by a 20 foot chain link fence. The archery range would have eight targets spaced fifteen feet apart with the length of the range 100 yards. Parking for each of these activities would be separate, with both areas allocated 0.25 acre. Cost Estimate Item Cost Site Preparation (9.25 acres) $ 7,353.75 Archery Range 2,451 .00 Driving Range 27,000.00 Metal Sign (2 @ 3' x 3') 200.00 Roadway Complete (5555.5 s.y.) 31 ,999.68 (4" A.B.C., Chip Seal) Parking Complete (.5 acre) 13,939.20 (4" A.B.C., Chip Seal) Total Cost $ 82,943.63 Equine Camping The equine camping area is located in the southeast corner of the proposed park adjacent to the proposed Rodeo Park. The area is approximately six acres in size with a proposed density of six campsites per acre. Each campsite would include a concrete picnic table, charcoal grill, waste can, and parking space. The equine camping area would have a separate access from the rest of the park. Access would be provided off that required for the rodeo park along Lost Dutchman Boulevard. A sanitary dump station would be located at the entrance to the camping area. Horsemen may utilize existing trails to access trails off-site to the north. Cost Estimate Item Cost Site Preparation (I acre) $ 795.00 Campsites (36) 24,036.48 i I► Sanitary Dump Station 44,000.00 Metal Sign (I @ 3' x 3') 200.00 Roadway Complete (2222.2 s.y.) 12,800.00 (4" A.B.C., Chip Seal) Total Cost $ 81 ,831 .48 Maintenance Yard The proposed park maintenance yard would be a 0.25 acre cleared and fenced area for parking of city maintenance vehicles and storage of supplies. Cost Estimate Item Cost Site Preparation (0.25 acres) $ 198.75 Chain Link Fencing (400' x 10') 7,656.00 Total Cost $ 7,854.75 Financing Financing for the proposed development will come from the City's general tax revenues, donations, and development grants. MANAGEMENT PLAN On receipt of a lease agreement with the Bureau of Land Management, the City of Apache Junction agrees to the responsible caretaking of the proposed park facilities and property described herein. The Community Services Branch of the Public Works Department of the City will be responsible for the development, operation, and maintenance of the proposed park facility. The park will be available for public recreational purposes to all citizens at no charge, or when necessary, at a reasonable fee commensurate with other similar facilities managed by governmental agencies. All proposed charges for use of park facilities will be submitted to the Bureau of Land Management for review of conformance to the lease agreement. Revenues from fee collection would be used for operation, maintenance, and further development of the proposed park site. In addition, lands under this lease will be developed and managed in accordance with the proposed development program contained within this application, and approval of construction plans will be sought by the City from the Bureau of Land Management before starting actual construction activities. 5-YEAR DEVELOPMENT PLAN The first phase of the proposed park development will occur over a five-year period after the lease application is approved. The following projected schedule of develop- ment is proposed: Year One Detailed development plans and specifications for picnic grounds, trails, and active sports area. $ I2,000.00 Surveys for road, parking, and trail construction 7,950.00 Site preparation and construction of maintenance yard 7,854.75 Total $ 27,804.75 Year Two Site preparation and construction of trails, and access road and parking area to the picnic grounds. $ 97,310.69 Surveys for picnic and active sports area construction. 3,000.00 Rental and servicing of portable .•. sanitation facilities. 96.00 Total $100,406.69 Year Three Site preparation and construction of family picnic and playground area $ 30,022.95 Site preparation for total area and construction of horseshoe, volleyball, and basketball courts 64, 153.28 Construction of fitness course 8,500.00 Rental and servicing of portable sanitation facilities 288 Total $102,964.23 Year Four Construction of tennis and shuffleboard courts $ 73,884.00 Site preparation and construction of group picnic area 46, 122.87 Survey, site preparation, and construction of roadway and equine camping area 81 ,831 .48 Rental and servicing of portable sanitation facilities 864.00 Total $202,702.35 Year Five Survey, site preparation, and construction of roadway, driving range and archery range $ 82,943.63 Rental and servicing of portable sanitation facilities 960.00 Total $ 83,903.63 In addition to these costs, the City of Apache Junction will provide operation and maintenance services on a continuing basis. MAINTENANCE PLAN The Public Works Department maintenance staff will be charged with the responsibility for upkeep and repair of recreation facilities on park property. Garbage pickup from cans and on the grounds and trails will occur on a weekly basis, with additional pickups occurring during special events or times of heavy use. Sanitation facilities will include portable toilets. These are rented on a monthly basis and will be serviced by the sanitation firm weekly. Road maintenance would involve that necessary to allow for easy ingress and egress of automobiles to developed areas. This would involve periodic grading, resurfacing, and removal of debris as necessary. BIBLIOGRAPHY - PRC Toups. 1980. Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. - City of Apache Junction. I980. Community Services five-Year Plan. Department ,..ak, of Public Works. - Kerr Associates, Inc. 1981. Cost Data for Landscape Construction. 2nd Annual Edition, March 1981. - Sweet's Division, McGraw-Hill Information Systems Company. 1981. Sweet's Catalog File: Products for General Building. - Mexico Forge. 1981. Engineered Park, Playground, and Athletic Equipment Catalog, page 38. - National Recreation and Park Association. 1971. National Park and Recreation Open Space Standards. - Duracast. 1981. Architectural Precast Landscape Furnishings. - Willdan Associates. 1981. Recreation Report: Memo Five - Salt River Channelization and Non-Structural Elements. File application at: Bureau of Land Management 2400 Valley Bank Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 .� Attention: Mario Lopez 4i ', 1 e,„ 0 h. ., ,• . . !1.: ry:•• -: ,:,,, ,ttar' ,u .,. ' n 9: r' 1 Y'.•( 1.•� .- ' PARK DEVELOPM'=NT PLAN• {��..�ry;�_,t:�.l.����YiY*• ��" • — PARK BOUNDARY -� EXISTING JEEP TRAIL 4.z .r�,� 4 e:'�.r 0•.7i..i- Sc'LEc' A.f.T�+oNfT/(/E —— UTILITY CORRIDOR ��� PROPOSED RODEO PARK '+� w K?:r js,iM Apache Junction,Arizona EXISTING ROAD AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ---- PROPOSED BICYCLE TRAIL .;,,A .,, y�.� ' L^•+'a Sccl,on 9 TIN PRE r ^r 1��tI 1. PROPOSED ROAD AN► RIGHT-OF-WAY ---- PROPOSED EQUESTRIAN TRAIL �`{ .• . Nl•+:.r o so - s WASH ---- PROPOSED NATURE TRAIL +� { ' � ""`�" 4k�`a '�� L- EXISTING VEGETATIC V ---- PROPOSED JOGGING TRAIL r r'1' � +- tit 'OJi�`.. ii .44„'Nt...T.i,;(4,04., • N•1•4;!-i-...,,t- 7 - ' . 1 �,* 1 it''' yi • 7• a9"- .,{,• '..ur I ' I _ sue•+• /,, ,„"4,.1t. •. .6•14, sti&flt."41,.• e'.( .........4...___---. . — --- -• i r'',4e4i1,4?..,..t.:,44,,,,a-,-,, / Ir. . 'ev4.464,1t:r14.'-' 'L , SY;.:y'tia.1J J.i f"...tr.- (i .1 �ti GIs" {�r �.4f r ....:..'°« s:` ,S/I,,.�\�.iv.s,'�.c\ft r.« ...,. . • t•om'' a • +�cats�+-!�7�,3'•�'1'.i+ �r'„�.x •.. . „, �. .C s .�,.... s� •/ t — �• I ��/ s.r '••.••µ', !r1•.`'^,/r —f'+�,}i��.i'* w `i - - --•— ( — — .. ,.�c '- ) "'•�• .Growl a.na.o. / l Syy�`s:�,i7�tt11 ff �:�(f▪ ,,a ▪ • ■I + ,...1.2... .'� rc«w.ur. --r l /i.'...�=•'♦ rr�/ �Y i it . r \ , ^� .�/ ��i.* x i i 1 i c /' j 1 ' ' f. a ,•)'. �.. f..w,. 1 r+I c...,.o ,o, :I K t` q�'AL• ,f �t$?� •1 •' ww.:ol..u.« 1 / t i v/ . r--r / ,as.'Y,, a t.v • \ j r.r.00° 1 //, .: c`ovr / 1 u.. 'O,7::T '/ ="- j _ j1�. w.ox cans�y. fie ♦ / 11 / �' f 1.:.,a •I J. •rM �.�. *'.L♦l .1 •it •• 1 i • I / i i / 1 .ro uu ne.o• 1 . 1 `� ' • N s,<:n ¢��!" 'x { :;; \ sJ{lO6y J1 /J ♦`- 1 ((/ .I i:p�; �Ct,,;j ,6• iyi r,a' _ ••.•♦ / '1. —i;". licit I 011P. , //J/� •�- „VIM!. ..c«csoiER�«r4,.. ,I `.�'l �I(,t�I y �1 ♦•- 0 ,-, 1 �✓rlc,• + ••i / :c. i wowrs"i..,, 'w0•1 • ( I f' //�•c I� 1 : -! Y II • sc6f'/',t� irlizi.! v/ '•i / '/n... ra co«ws. 1nw1 � / /,—"'•♦ /' : ,��••,�•yy 1iL • '11.: �a �+;'.1ji' ,w:i..7, /,' �• ?��• � / l) "w�\ n 1 �. _ i t / i cs i i" r, .icy1 ��0}."�!ft\1�jI{'• '_'i.=� //'/i\J lull...t. . I 1 ` /•. '�...r i♦.. ! /, ...,. r_•"' : c,S n r�:r./"�!,yM• S;c, i •.\ \�y✓ (. 1 1 .,a,r. /, 1 +' V I -,. , ........,,�: / e i 's {rut �'yyY,p�1r�r rx • ! ( • •••i\ /nJ r ; / '�,/ / ' ����� — —rii ��;--..�---_ r' ' •.. • c� vZ.• .\,�,ia t• ilt" 1 ••.; . re.,...u..,.° / `\ �\ S '\ i y . a yA�y`JJ•j fr-5,j�}(RY/�.SLyr f / ••. \ r 11 1 . . , \.G ir"--- '4-4'.F.t.ii-rly„I'i i%:'.:4 \i' ( 1 •.. --„,.. t . ....:. ..... , ' I 1 r', _� j•' l `t'r : . , ••. tar-a IA p=1.d. a '�� 1 a Decmeber 28 , 19S1 BLM ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FIVE-YEAR YEAR ONE Property Boundary Survey $ 3 , 000 00 YEAR TWO Partial Development of Road and parking 3, 000 00 (botanical preserve) Design and Survey of Nature and Jogging Trail 3 , 000. 00 $ 6 , 000 00 YEAR THREE Construction of Nature and Jogging Trail 3 , 000 . 00 Metal signing of Botanic Preserve 1, 500 . 00 Design and Survey Family Picnic and Playground 2 , 000 . 00 Partial Development of Road and Parking 2 , 500 00 (nicnic area) $ 9 , 000 . 00 YEAR FOUR Design and Survey group picnic 2 , 000 .00 — Construct five family picnic sites 5 , 000 . 00 Partial playground development 7 , 000 . 00 S14, 000 . 00 YEAR FIVE Complete development of nlavcround 8 , 000 00 Construct five family nicnic sites 6, 000 . 00 Design and survey of Active Sports area 5 , 000 00 $19 , 000 . 00 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 05h6)9 Oil{\ ITEM /I MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: C-LCY YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON _ V� COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITI- COUNCILMAN DA.MIANO VICF MAYOR HIl L MAYOR CLARKE UNAN I MOUS I N FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ..'..:. .,,.'�. ITEM NO , 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND UNDER THE RECREATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSE ACT BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE THE DESCRIBED BRUEAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF A CITY PARK, GOI APPWW81 ON AtioN v .,4 . • .... '. zr+rwi�twiq�Riw +r',9+Wc;,' al.deeanasrarr+.:r•�,..r:.v:+'tv,.�,Fw a,v.i.i.-..:v+>.s+wz:.e£'a+tG-,wae2*-rL�! '.s..n,,vt.�x 3kxo.c. f.-,: •eN4++!i�i?...Rwh*Nn;+M�dtM ciih- . , f - ,:s-:-'- �aESi+kyrl4@read+r:wewwwsi� ;�;:tri+aiatritar".ea"a.nc..,a* iilwi:..:..xr>c-irlDzb.;w's+':. LPiwsz;�e. .::e.7>s(r...hl`+`�'e3' ..F,.. . . ... ,... ... , • . . .. •_,- ITEM NO . 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND UNDER THE RECREATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSE ACT, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED , FOR DENIAL iNi-ACHE ✓✓ (- _ ; F eU 1� - ar.. a y A- xlIZO ?' (=Oit y an. &47IGL322unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION AO Mk, FOR /I ,6haf+ BOARD/GO-K I-8tt1/COMMITTE'E J DATE. -Z.--4P7 • /C-L — �2 NA 1L: � q h An h a 6 a 1 O TELEPHONE: (home) /'� ! (office) ADDRESS: ZIP CODE: F s a_zd OCCUPATION: (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: /() � � ha oG-L PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMJidITY ACTIVITIES: /y 7 q_ �ct,,,e-ne,, 4rt,„,>tiA2,_,,,h,„,,y ?ho7i-ar, I /(, D Po Tv21-_ I9V- Set n-..r2e-. — ppe s-cA064. - R Q,C.. �. )/�ruork - //70141gh--6-tn ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: �eff1/f S'`jQAD� ler/ El Q/?o b LS T2., ew ( / - n7 Cede,, NOTE. As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. 6ct...t.---e.—e2--r--oL--- c5L- -7.) Revised 6/19/31 Signature of Applicant 77 ICOI NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JJNCTUON.ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 A. A► ��`c PQACHF ✓G2 • 6 r;,!;r� Nk- z ,,r-....-;: gR/zoW" it y o, & pac/ie unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR �L . 43--(70Alb BOARD/COMMISSION/CO1MMITTEEC DATE: / /& ' O NAHE: Pa h•, ee41 JA Ct9)! / l/a mS TELEPHONE: (office) ADDRESS: / ! / ' /ZIP CODE: ,5 00 OCCUPATION: phak-rna( //cw4/G /,. - A/CO A kw/tact/ �‘,-,2 g.i1arti, (if retired, p1 se indicate former occupation or professio ) ///es� cyEDUCATION. 9dtC/c�� //6 ��C��� %,��L,// ro/�//irisi4, 66/// c ,/� /% / d/`is or /.9--s.1.1 PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES y{r)(,()Ai1l" j_eor,(��>h 4/, T�`J0 `5//(3 C s r5 f, / ci E/c r ticali 1 . I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE L A a v e a.y r-eG., in fer,c- ---/ u,i,id ,'p iefT sc- ( icei,-r, ,./1 `-he i-ro o�il t� Ccj JA.h l/,'/c/ Q/ 'Me /1 h rq_rc/ ia z7edpc i/7 a//l teG S G'1' /{c_ . ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION R NCES• / /)d_/e `/..l.n A u h ^ Pf1GrYxl c�5/ p 3?-O/7s- c . JbAO ( D// 0SJ1Afr'a.>^ /414 F�,?-/// � f 7asp 3r � .� her �o x�=.Ne,,j4h,,ks NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. r 4.i.;3 ,.,:�.,. t s..:, If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand thaE, c rL+i: 0k ttdi tIo- .. ; "." is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 dayt,,.at n rb "t,ame• unless ;:,?;� y�I,, authorized by the Mayor and Council. x' '_jc 4..*.:,,.;.xw, «: J1k.z'•l G__ " p ; ,- : ‘`. :-/, -416•444-: :. . 0.10iiV*10`404t#414tei i ature of pl cant` _;-• . x_;.. , 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • T OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZ01�f1 85220 • -TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 _' " '•'' Aams, Amt. litkCHE O 4P/Z00‘ amity cpache 09unction January 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER 1.1% 44"' FROM: ACTING CITY CLERK SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD At the regular City Council meeting of January 5, 1982, the Council unanimously voted to table the motion regarding appointments to the Library Board pending the submitting of additional Talent Bank applications. News Releases were prepared and sent to the Apache Sentinal announ- cing the vacancy on the Library Board. As of this date, there have been no new applications submitted. It should be noted, however, that there are now two positions available on the Library Board due to the resignation of Mrs. Elizabeth Burks on January g, 1982. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the Councils previous action to await additional Talent Bank applications before appointing any new members to the Library Board, it is recommended that the item be left on the table until the next regular Council meeting in order to allow time for additional interested citizens to apply. athleen Connelly Acting City Clerk Approver for Agenda. kmc Date Item # First RC3 ' >ig Second Rae I:ng . /Public Hcar;ng Business New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 4 PQp,CHE jo O 0 � O ;� '�y Z . _ ii gRrzONP its oe pache �unctian TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR ) , /Ir- ,'1r-1/ 'BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: , ) <<-).i I 1 . I iSC1 NAME: ALL h ✓ 7)1 / �' v- S-,A <-' 1_Jt TELEPHONE: / (office) ADDRESS: .. / ZIP CODE: .�_>7 V D or OCCUPATION: 0 IF, c. E.. A ;4 ,,,,/4, (-,f_ - A n / n /- J `, / c. /J ,,,, A t 0 >c (if retired, please/ indicate former occupation or profession) co �,,,1, y1 Y, C c EDUCATION: /�71,',// ��_ /(1�� ! — 4/ 5- , )1 -e ; S =-�or3- `70n / PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: C / 6, G_c lJ "/ : c" i c c( s- .,- - ° / / .mot c' 1^v n / I-1i/ c I FEEL[ THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/1COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: Co /? / /-/,-9 t.1 v , I., 7 NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. 1 Signature of Applicant 1 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 i (e(\C-h'r jo A.. _ .•. / r-71---1)i i cA.,,..._ i' 0 J__- -52-17-l. ----'U---- IU ,•Y• ire.. ?' Z \\......._ 'gRIZOON V. ity on e—d pac`12 1121Ction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR,�'� �_ f'J f-!-=e-u=?"7-.„ BOARD/COMM I S S ION/COMMITTEE DATE: 7- ,Z-S-/O NAME: A dt4 TELEPHONE: (home) U (office) ADDRESS: „ ZIP CODE: 8"✓5;2,2-e OCCUPATION: e 7 ,,4..e (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: �c/'--- PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO L:UNIT`? ACTIVITIES: 67-1-9-!'Gum e_eZy j I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE Allftik ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Sigiv,4..ure of Applicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION APIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602) 982-6154 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR HILL _ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL .vMc%+Jrie..rr •�.+.,aa:x;'.lc+�niws� ':_. ..'--zdu.+w.aw:<r+-c•>..vcay:-`•zYrM�.r4�-,tSae.w-:€s:�.ira,ms:.ccau-xrx<.:azi.a,':t.�..,.:;,s.- ..:::._ .. . •.-;- .: • .,;.F54i.`r»Y:aw6:H.iESy:.p:aY...c49vhane+'Ns1nmF:•6gfan:�...:v ...r-.:.a.. r„.,<:,_., ...:..,_...: ...ss tl.x ,r_a. r:.r. ...,., ,... , - _ .. ITEM NO , 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE LIBRARY BOARD MEMBER APPOINTMENT AGENDA ITEM, BE AND HEREBY IS, REMOVED FROM THE TABLE . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : YES NO A3STAI NED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITF _ COUNCILMAN TIAMIANO VICE MAYOR Hill _ MAYOR CI ARKE UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED A3STAINED TOTAL t.:_. f .,:`a:-...,r., i. -.. ^•t:. ,.aknt++frtiw.=i,w,„ Je.--- z�s �cr ei{!f`.�>...-' :.. ... CK�>•R'1JiA•"1:I2ati:N<%p vtw"fSIM•,:,t-..i 4^-.,a«,.. ..,:. :, ., a's .... .mow .. - -•. - ITEM NO , 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT , BE AND HEREBY IS, APPOINTED TO THE LIBRARY BOARD, SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. IIft, Aft, PQACHF do <C tq �' wa, F art 1 4�4 1 Y 1 i:12�1 f� YM �A ate 0 U , t t.rs.`91 r Z i a�, 1 T '1Rizoo• 'Oily on C paclee unction January 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER a47,0 FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: RESIGNATION FROM THE LIBRARY BOARD Due to personal reasons, Ms Elizabeth Burks has resigned from the Library Board. Attached is a letter of resignation from Ns Burks. I would like to recommend to the City Council that this resignation be accepted. Please contact me if you should have questions. L/r1,___,... */ d AIM b, KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk lvc Approver for Agenda pato ItemFirst Rsa'":,g 1 /L • . Seco r9 ._ ., Old Cus+ness New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 /m Elizabeth Burks 1951 W. 9th Ave. Apache Jct., AZ. 85220 January 9, 1992 Mr. Donald Taylor, Secretary Apache Junction Public Library Board of Trustees Re: Resignation Dear Yr. Taylor: I wish to resign from the Apache Junction Public Library Board of Trustees effective immediately, in order to apply for the position of librarian of the Apache Junction Public Library. I feel that it is not in the best interests of the Library Board or the City of Apache Junction that I continue as an officer and member of the Library Board while seeking the position of librarian. Sincerely yours, Elizabeth Burks ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: `) SECONDED BYa \\ QQ, YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON V( COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS V VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE V UNANI"^,OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL .;_,,:. --; _ • .t:nue:«SSs.,•;.�vira.v;a t,,,..v ... . ...: .i. .. - _ .r. _. . , • • 14, ITEM NO . 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MS ELIZABETH BURKS FROM THE LIBRARY BOARD, BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED WITH REGRET . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM II MEETING OF MOT IO^d BY; \ U SECONDED BY ; L----ttO YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON V / COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE V UNANI"!O S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL oloft, _ . .101\ .001 , . ITEM NO . 12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON FEBRUARY 2, 1982, AT 6 : 00 P .M. PQACHE✓ 1. :, Il r ?. z ....._) q,p/ZONP Vitt' oe Cpache cOunction January 14, 1982 r MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER /4/,r FROM: ,J`-'" JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING/ EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL OF "MINUTES" Attached are copies of the approved "Minutes" from the November 10, 1981 , and December 8, 1981 , meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary. Please have the original "Minutes" inserted into the "Minutes Book. " Thank you. '•` JWG:rin 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 /^ MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA NOVEMBER 10, 1981 7 30 P M In Attendance Absent Guests George Baljo, Chairman Richard 0ltman-illness Ben Honor ---' -- Mildred Baker, Vice Chairman Fred Dickson Roger Hall Richard Taylor John Hutchens Al DiLucido Ron Kell Robert Lake Mark McPherson Robert Hare Harry Polomskey Pam Counthy Ilene Tayler Tony Vehon Henry Steelsmith, Council Liaison Elmer Martin Joe Gero, Executive Secretary E.J Filkey Richard Bryant, City Engineer Margery Wilson Carolyn Anderson Synopsis Howell Anderson Walter Johnson Amendment to and acceptance of Agenda Joan Johnson Commission Initiative (Case #PZ-21-81/PECK) continued Cecil Ruza until 12/8/81 Donie Ruza Acceptance of Minutes Colonel Murkey Public Hearings. Wilson (PZ-19-81) Frank Burch Tandy (PZ-20-81 & AB-81-7) Thelma Honeywell Wilburn (AB-80-1) Roy Honeywell Old Business Hare (PZ-18-81) Josephine Scherer Dickey (PC-PZ-12-81) Jorgeh Scherer Setting General Plan Meeting Bernice Carter Resignation of George Baljo, as Chairman, will Mardid E Mackey continue to serve on Commission Harold Dickey Harold Dickey Jack Tandy Donna Tandy Jim Fickas Keith Stachar Mike Kovas Vinton Peck Craig Peck Martin Peterson " Lee Peterson Lonnie Baker Pastor Jerry Babor Emily Cassady Tery Archer Lucia Drysdale _ L Alan Drysdale Kathryn Wilburn Terry Wilburn Jerry Michner 1 Chairman called the meeting to order at 7 30 P M and asked the Recording Secretary to call the roll 2. Ms. Nendza called the roll and determined eight members were present as indicated above, with Mr. Oltman having called the Planning Office to inform the Commission of his absence due to illness 3. Chairman acknowledged a quorem was present and asked the Executive Secretary to advise the Commission of the additional material just presented regarding one of the public hearings scheduled for this meeting, PZ-21-81 (Peck) Page 2 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 4. Mr. Gero announced that a petition was received at approximately 7 20 P M this evening requesting 1) the voiding of their names from the application petition to allow the public hearing, and 2) that the rezoning not be • . , " v �� approved There are 14 of 17 property owners within 300 feet represented and apparently five of five affected property owners Should the application proceed a unanimous vote of the City Council would be necessary it was explained. This leaves the applicant without the required signatures and, therefore, the application does not meet the minimum requirements of the ordinance Staff's opinion was that the application cannot proceed further due to the failure to meet minimum zoning ordinance requirements. 5. Chairman asked the applicant, Mr. Peck, if he wished to comment 6 Vincent Peck stated that this turn of events was surprising to him, he said he had informed the people who had signed his application list that he intended to build four-plexes 7. Chairman reiterated that the case could not be heard without the 51% requirement being met but asked staff if there were options 8. Mr Gero noted that three possible options could be contemplated 1 Motion by the Commission to authorized a Commission Initiative and allow the public hearing to continue as advertised or be set for a specific time, date, and place. 2 Motion to ammend the Agenda to delete the application, breaking the chain of advertisement. 3 Table the motion to seek legal counsel although the chain of advertisement may be broken by this action Staff believed, however, that the application is voided by the petition for signature withdrawal, unless public hearing is authorized by Commission Initiative 9. Chairman asked for a motion after a lengthy discussion had ensued PIN 10 Mr Kell requested the options be restated, which was done by the Executive Secretary 11 Taylor/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the agenda be amended to insert consideration of case PZ-21-81 (Peck) for a possible Commission Initiative right after approval of the agenda, and that the agenda as amended •- ^�'"`��`�� be approved for this meeting. The motion passed 5-3. --`~ 12. Chairman asked for a motion on a possible commission initiative for PZ-21-81 13 Taylor/Baljo M/S 'BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the case 1 PZ-21-81 (Peck) be by Commission Initiative and that the public hearing and case be continued to the December 8, 1981 regular meeting in this location at 7 30 P M 14 Chairman had relinquished the gavel to the Vice Chairman during the discussion of the motion and was reinstated as Chairman after the vote A motion to approve the "Minutes" was invited after minor corrections that did not appear on members' copies were noted by the Executive Secretary _ .> ...,..-ter. ... ..:.:..,....:.-.-.�.,:,r.�..-,.•ran Page 3 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 15 Kell/Baker M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission that the "Minutes" dated October 13, 1981, be approved as presented with the Executive Secretary's corrections." r„ ,y The motion passed 7-0-1, with Mr Hutchens voting ' -' "= � °w" ' ' "present" due to absence at that meeting 16 Chairman opened the public hearing and asked staff to brief th^ Commission on case PZ-19-81 (Wilson) 17 Mr Gero explained that in the application of Herschall Wilson "— - - Mr Paul Connelly has power of attorney. The rezoning request is from CB-1 (Local Business Zone) to CB-2 (General Business Zone) The required statistical data was recited 18 Chairman invited the applicant to speak 19 Paul Connelly introduced himself and outlined the purpose of the re- zoning as necessary to establish a block and ornamental brick yard there. 20 Chairman asked the Commission members if there were questions 21. Ms. Taylor inquired where the entrance would be 22 Mr Connelly stated the entrance would be from Broadway Avenue. 23 Mr Hall asked what size trucks would deliver the block 24 Mr. Connelly answered that he did not know 25 Mr Hall wanted to know if there were residences in the area 26 Mr Connelly answered affirmatively 27 Chairman there being no further questions of the applicant, invited public comment in favor or opposition of the project 28 Donie Ruza introduced herself and commented that Mr. Wilson had attempted to establish an airconditioning business at the same location two years ago She stated that aelliN now, as then, the residents of the area are opposed to the application because they had purchased their homes for retirement The residents had conceded to a CB-1 zone for Mr. Wilson, but had no desire to see this zone change granted. 29. Harold Englin introduced himself and spoke in opposition to the request. He explained that the zoning requested would — —------- allow a multitude of business endeavors and noted that Mr Wilson would not be obligated to establish a block and brick yard, but could put in any of the allowable types of CB-2 businesses He also expressed concern that many of the people who signed Mr Wilson's sign- ture list did not comprehend that there were many alternate business types that he could elect to establish under the CB-2 zone He stated that those people were present and wished to withdraw their names from the signature list. A further concern expressed was that a wash would need to be bridged or filled be- fore entrance from Delaware could be possible. v.' a 4.. t • Page 4 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 30 Joe Scherer introduced himself and stated he had not received a notice of the rezoning request, that it may have been sent to his out-of-state address (records verified this to be the case) He expressed concern about access off g�x � , Broadway Avenue onto the subject property due to a . ;' �.... deep wash 31 Mr Gero pointed out that, if the people speaking in objection were actually requesting their names be withdrawn from the applicant's signature list, in view of the ex- planation as to how the zoning district works, as Mr Englin stated, then they should so state Although the requests were not in the form of a written petition, ... they were a matter of public record in the form of this meeting's "Minutes," and individuals could request their names be removed from the petition 32 Chairman invited further comment in opposition to the application 33 Denise Carter introduced herself and stated she was against the rezoning 34 Chairman asked if she was wishing to make an official request to - have her name withdrawn from the signature list. 35. Ms Carter answered that she withdraws her name from the list, she does not want the CB-2. 36 Mr Scherer requested that his name officially be withdrawn, also. 37 Mrs Scherer requested that her name be withdrawn from the list, also 38. Mr. Honeywell stated he did not believe he or his wife signed anything connected with a CB-2 rezoning, but if they did, they tt would like to withdraw their signatures 39. Mr. Gero noted that both Roy and Thelma Honeywell's signatures appear on the applicant's signature list 40. Chairman requested that Mrs Honeywell personally verbalize her desire to have her signature withdrawn. 41 Ms Honeywell so confirmed by stating her name PIS 42 Mr Gero advised the Commission that the required number of signatures was now only six of 16 obtained by the _ - _ applicant and, unless a Commission Initiative is authorized, the application should be voided. 43 Chairman asked for rebuttal from the applicant 44. Mr. Connelly stated he had no comment at this time 45 Chairman called for a motion 46 Mr Kell inquired if action was necessary due to the withdrawal of signatures 47 Mr Gero answered that the item, being part of the Agenda, must be acted upon, a motion recognizing the withdrawal of the signatures and declaring the application void might be in order 48 Kell/Hutchens MIS "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction that case PZ-19-81, also known as Ordinance No 118, the application of Herschall Wilson, be declared null and void due to the withdrawal of signatures creating an insufficient application Page 5 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 49 Chairman yielded the gavel to participate in the discussion of the motion He stated the difference between this case and the previous case discussed this evening was that the actual withdrawal has gone into the official record in the Wilson case, where the Peck case did not have the people present who were withdrawing their names. 50. Acting Chairman called for a roll call vote The motion passed unanimously The Chairmanship was ttt return to Mr Baljo 51 Chairman called for staff to brief the Commission on the next 1 case, PZ-20-81 (Tandy) 52. Mr. Gero noted that power of attorney was presented this evening, Mr. Jim Fickas will represent Mr Tandy The rezoning request is from General Rural (GR) to Trailer Homesite by Planned Development (TH/PD) He outlined the statistics relative to the case The suggestion was made to consider both this case and the next agenda item (Street Abandonment AB-81-7) jointly for public hearing purposes. The planned development case involves area within AB-81-7 and, therefore, the abandonment should be considered before a recommendation can be made on PZ-20-81 The proposed abandonment was described. It was explained " +* that before the planned development could be approved, the dedication of the right-of-way along North Ironwood - - Drive must be confirmed. The planned development project would be described by the applicant At this point, the city engineer was called upon for details of the aban- donment portion 53 Chairman asked if there was objection to hearing PZ-20-81 and AB-81-7 jointly There was none The city engineer was asked to commence his presentation 54 Mr Bryant introduced himself and referred to Section 13-2-4 of the City Code as the guide to the Abandonment Comments from the various utility companies in the subject area were noted, none of which had objection to the abandumient of public right-of-way access as long as utility eas :s remained (Salt River Project was represented by Mr Al DiLucido in case there were questions concerning power lines ) He pointed out that one of the Tandy's parcels of land could be landlocked and a stipulation might be in order �. y-< •:. ;;�,,,,M to assure legal access (i e., by combining it with the adjacent lot owned by the same individual). It was suggested that, as a condition of the abandonment, ;.. the Street Classification Guide be followed, Mr Tandy would then dedicate 17 more feet to Ironwood Drive and the Andersons (owning Parcels 28A, 28B, and 29 would dedicate 7 more feet to Teepee Street, and the owner of Parcel 30B would dedicate 7 more feet to Teepee Street. 55 Chairman asked if there were questions to be asked of Mr Bryant or the SRP representative 56 Mr. Gero requested it be made clear that the "access" the utility companies are willing to abandon is the public access and not their access to repair lines Page 6 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 57. Mr. DeLucido replied that Salt River Project has no objection to the abandonment of the use of the property as a roadway however, it is necessary to have an easement retained for the existing facilities An "easement" implies access is available for repair and maintenance. 58 Ms Taylor asked Mr Tandy if this piece of land was divided into two 21 acre parcels. 59 Mr Bryant answered that according to the Assessor's map, yes 60. Ms. Taylor inquired if the entire five acres were to be used by the applicant 61 Mr Gero answered affirmatively and pointed out that the project is for the full five acres including easement area If the abandonment were approved and the planned development were not, the one parcel would be landlocked, even though both parcels are in one ownership He then requested Mr Bryant explain the additional right- of-way requested as a contingency on the abandonment. 62 Mr Bryant explained that the request would meet the 40' half-street requirement of the Street Classification Plan 63. Mr. McPherson wondered about the advantages/disadvantages of leaving a 40-acre area without local streets 64 Mr. Bryant stated that all properties in the area would have access to other streets and no negative points appear despite the lack of local streets 65. Chairman invited other questions 66 Mr Hare introduced himself and stated he was with Arizona Water Company He wanted to remind the Commission that no permanent structures could be built on utility easements 67 Mr Gero explained that planned development sets specific setback requirements and the applicant has not submitted his proposal at this point The current requirement under General Rural is 40 feet, however, if the zoning changed, the setback requirement under the new zoning would apply 68 Chairman asked for verification, then, that there would be room for water lines 69 Mr Gero answered affirmatively 70 Chairman asked Mr. DiLucido if other utility companies use SRP right-of-way. 71 pMr. Bryant restated that if the public right-of-way is requested of City Council to be abandoned, and the 66 foot width of street be retained at utility easements, no problem should arise 72 Chairman asked if there were further questions of staff There being none, the applicant was invited to comment • y ;= - . Amok Oil 4, Page 7 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 73 Mr Fickas introduced himself as representing Mr. Tandy with power of attorney for them in this matter at the meeting. Addressing the abandonment first, the applicant is only interested at this time in public access being abandoned, not utility easement abandonment. The __..._�...___.� fact that the parcel is divided into two 2'2 pieces, that can be remedied by a quit-claim deed by the applicant who owns both, the landlocking issue woul then be remedied Or, if the planned development is approved (PZ-20-81), the issue would be resolved He detailed the planned development process goals for the benefit of the audience In referring to "base district" governing permitted uses, he proposed that the subject property's base district would be TH. By this definition, he maintained that the applicant would not be establishing a mobile home park, but a "TH/PD " 74. Mr. Gero asked to clarify He defined "lot" and "mobile home park" from the zoning ordinance The original application was for a twelve-lot subdivision by trailer homesite planned development That action is temporarily stopped by the Groundwater Law The applicant was advised that he had three options 1) He could begin a subdivision and proceed to the point of going before council which _ _ would only be able to rule in favor of the applicant contingent upon the Groundwater Legislation being resolved, 2) He could split his parcel into three lots (subdivisions are four or more lots) and then sell as many of the lots as he would desire, 3) He could create a mobile home park by being allowed by Council a five-acre variance to the ( requirement of a ten-acre minimum and then rent spaces. Il He pointed out that the applicant cannot, however, cir- cumvent the State real estate law and sell parcels beyond the two or three lots the property can be divided into by gaining planned development approval The State being a higher level agency has their definitions which cannot be circumvented. 75. Mr. Fickas stated that that was not the intention of the applicant He indicated the intention had not yet been presente)^ yet Mr Gero was expressing an opinion on it. - - 76. Mr. Gero replied that he was presenting the available options of the applicant, not expressing an opinion 77. Ms. Taylor commented that she had not conferred with Mr Gero Her interpretation of the application as presented in her packet would require a mobile home park and when the Groundwater Legislation is resolved, a subdivision could be acquired She asked the applicant why there would be an objection to the property being classified as a mobile home park 78 Mr Fickas answered that parks reqiure ten acres and so they have avoided referring to the proposal as anything other than TH/PD 79 Ms Taylor expressed an inability to understand this since the five acres would be planned development as a mobile home park 80 Mr Fickas reiterated that the intention of the applicant has not yet been presented and asked permission to continue "iimk Auk Page 8 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 81 Chairman agreed he should continue. 82. Mr. Fickas explained that the Tandys originally wanted to move to Apache Junction and bought the five-acres as a homesite. However, they do not want acreage, they prefer mobile home living on a moderate sized lot • ,.--., -,w_, __�-����, �„� �<;.,�;, Their original intention was to divide the property into 11/4 acre parcels , the minimum requirement in the GR district This size was more than they desire and they are seeking an alternative By TH/PD with lot sizes larger than those found in mobile home parks yet smaller than the current zoning requires, the twelve large -- --- spaces would be offered on a rental basis A full description of the proposed project was then presented 83 Chairman invited questions from the members of the Commission 84. Ms. Taylor asked who would do the landscaping 85 Mr Fickas answered that, as owner of the property, Mr Tandy would be responsible for the overall landscaping of the individual lots 86 Ms Taylor asked if the tenant would be assessed a fee for the landscaping 87 Mr Fickas said "no." 88 Ms Taylor inquired about the tenant perhaps not wanting an awning 89 Mr Fickas replied that that would be a requirement the tenant would have to meet. 90 Ms. Taylor asked if the mobile homes would be sold by an on-site agent. 91 Mr. Fickas answered "no, not at this time." 92 Ms Taylor asked if there was a water problem with this particular property 93 Mr Fickas answered, "no " 94. Chairman invited other questions. There being none, he invited comments in favor or opposition of the application 95 Carolyn Anderson introduced herself and stated that the applicant had told her they were (Dino to sell individual lots, but never mentioned it would be a trailer park. She also "'d•�'`=K^-�~^' ^^ � stated she did not care to forfeit the requested seven feet of Tepee Street mentioned in the abandonment case by the City Engineer Prior to tonight she was not aware of this requirement 96 Chairman called upon Mr Gero for clarification. 97 Mr Gero outlined the Anderson property and noted that concerning the requested surrender of seven feet on Teepee it might be germaine to the issue to ask the Andersons if that is developed and would cause a hardship He further clarified the mobile home park proposal by mentioning that the TH/PD, if approved by the Council , must be conformed to by the applicant noting that the larger lot size would eliminate comparison to other mobile home parks. • I , OuN Page 9 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 98 Ms Anderson commented that the requested seven feet of Teepee would involve moving meters and fencing and she would not be willing to do that 99 Chairman recognized Mr Anderson 100. Mr Anderson introduced himself and said it would be impossible to give the seven feet on Teepee as there are already mobile home park facilities in the area 101. Chairman asked why Teepee is involved ---- --�.�,------ 102 Mr Bryant explained that that stipulation was included because the Street Classification Plan requirements are not met at this time. By including this stipulation, adherence to the Street Classification Plan is assured Since that seven feet is already developed, an agree- ment could be drawn whereby the Andersons need not remove any of the development of the seven feet until such time that the city needs it for that specific street-widening project 103 Mr. Anderson stated that such an agreement would not be necessary because they would not be willing to surrender the seven feet. 104. Chairman again stated that Teepee should not even be involved in this matter. 105. Mr Gero suggested the seven foot right-of-way on Teepee be dismissed at this time and if the Andersons decide to convert the park to another use, require the surrender of the seven feet when they apply for their building permit Or, the Commission could submit the options to the City Council to consider 106 Chairman recognized Mr Fickas. 107 Mr Fickas commented that this requested seven feet is new to him, also, and that it should be handled between the city and Andersons and not at this time because it strains the relationship between Tandys and Andersons who have been working together to abandon the other streets 108 Chairman asked if there was further comment in opposition of the application. There being none, he invited rebuttal The public hearing was closed without rebuttal Staff was requested to summarize 109. Mr. Gero noted that the Commission was made aware of the °+Nab, i requested seven feet of Teepee (reference was made _ to that section of the member's packets) Recom- mended that a motion first be made on the abandonment and that two options were available regarding Teepee 1) recommend to the Council that the footage be re- quired as a stipulation of approval, 2) not recommend it The alternatives should be forwarded to the Council and the Commission may or may not choose to make a recommendation on the issue 110 Chairman invited questions from the membership 111 Mr Kell wondered about the abandonment being approved and the planned development not. 112 Mr Gero suggested the abandonment motion be contingent upon the results of the planned development consideration is- • �.,1 Page 10 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 113. Mr. Hutchens inquired concerning the project's conformity to the new General Plan 114 Mr Gero pointed out the subject property on the Land Use Plan (north of Teepee Street) 115 Mr Kell noted it was a low density area with one acre parcels recommended and asked to make a point on the planned development prior to considering the abandonment 116. Chairman noted that there were two applications for which the applicant paid $250 for an abandonment public hearing He refused to agree to one being contingent upon another He indicated that a recommendation on the abandonment was in order at this time 117 Mr Kell responded that if the Commission approves an abandonment and it goes before the Council, and the Commission fails to approve the planned development, one parcel will be landlocked should Council approve the abandonment 118 Chairman said, "I don't know this." He insisted the abandonment must be ruled upon and a separate ruling must be made in each case 119. Mr. Gero requested a five-minute recess. 120 Chairman asked if there was objection to a five-minute recess There being none, the meeting was so recessed. The Chairman reconvened the meeting at 10 20 P M and called for a motion considering abandonment 121 Ms Taylor asked if the planned development could be taken first 122 Chairman stated it made no difference, the abandonment still had to be acted upon. He said the applicant may still want the abandonment even If the planned development is denied 123 Ms Taylor wondered about the effect of the abandonment on the 01,4N Anderson property 124 Mr Gero explained that the Department of Public Works has requested that should the recommended approval of the __ abandonment be submitted to Council, a seven foot easement on Teepee be granted to the city He, again, outlined the Commission's options. 125. Chairman suggested the Commission consider tabling the abandonment _ ._.....,_._ giving the applicant time to resolve the situation of the possible landlocking. 126 i1r Gero reminded the Commission that if the planned development were approved, 33' of public right-of-way, which is part of the abandonment issue, would remain within the planned development area cutting the lot sizes proposed 127 Chairman restated that the abandonment and the planned development are two separate issues He, again, noted that the applicant paid $250 for an abandonment request and $100 for a zoning request and the two should be treated as separate cases If we make one issue contingent upon another, then we don't give him his $250 worth nor do we give him his $100 worth Recognizing Mr Fickas, he reminded him that the public hearing had been closed. 0.141 Page 11 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 128. Mr. Fickas reminded the Commission that the issue of the landlocked property had not surfaced until that day and could be resolved in a single business day He asked if the roadways could be abandoned contingent upon the two parcels being merged. 129. Chairman mentioned that it had been stated that many rights-of- way existing within the city may not need to exist This could be the beginning of eliminating some of ttys rights-of-way despite approval or denial of the plant development A motion on the abandonment was requests.. 130 Mr Hutchens asked how the abandonment, without considering the planned development, would comply with the General Plan. 131 Mr Gero answered that it would fit well into the Plan provided the access issue is resolved 132 Chairman again, requested a motion 133 Hall/Polomsky M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junciton, Arizona, that abandonment case AB-81-7 be tabled until the next regular meeting of the Commission " The motion passed 5-3. 134 Chairman entertained a motion for rezoning case PZ-20-81 (Tandy) 135. Kell/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, in rezoning case PZ-20-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 120, application of Jack Tandy, for the property the de- scription of which is a matter of record, requesting It rezoning from General Rural to Trailer Homesite by Planned Development (TH/PD) the Commission recommend the Apache Junction City Council deny said application." 136 Mr Kell stated the reasons for the motion are 1) present zoning allows four lots and the proposed zoning would permit the applicant's desired twelve lots (three times the number currently allowed) 2) the Commission has studied at great length over the last several months the concern for densities, sewer, water, and populatiON growth Despite the fact that the applicant would probably establish a better mobile home park, the den...cy - - - is not justifiable from the data presented Although the plan has not yet been approved, there is a point where the line must be drawn If we allow the trend to continue where attractive plans are approved, raising the population level to a greater degree than recommended by the plan, we are violating the recommendations of the Land Use Committee. It seems immoral to present a plan to the community one night that outlines specific goals and the next night violate those goals 137 Chairman yielded the gavel He prophesied that it would be a matter of months before Council ruled on the recom- mended General Plan. Beyond that, it would be more months before reclassification of the land itself is dealt with Meanwhile, many requests for rezoning be heard He stated that until Council rules on the plan, he intends to rule on the individual cases by the merits of the request 138 Mr Kell responded that there is a point where the line is drawn Under the current zoning laws, a mobile home park requires ten acres. Recognizing this as a planned development, some of those concerns can be waived However, considering that this five acres currently allows no more than four lots, and because it is a nice :r development three times that density is allowed r Concerns of precedent and concern for the plan therefore4 -vi KA arise. Page 12 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 139. Ms. Taylor wished to make public that her second to the motion was made for reasons other than those expressed by Mr Kell 140. Mr. Ba1,7o commented that if this application is turned down because of concern over future density, he maintains �„� u�� that a moratorium is established on future development within Apache Junction until the Council by Commission ♦� • and Council Initiative does so change the classifications on these lands within the low density recommendation. He suggested a tabling of this issue 141 Acting Chairman asked for a vote, there being no further discussion. The motion passed 7-1 _ 142 Chairman was returned the gavel and he stated the recommendation for denial would be presented to Council, "God help us " He requested staff brief the Commission on the next - - item of business, AB-80-1 (Wilburn). 143 Mr. Gero deferred to the city engineer 144 Mr Bryant explained that the applicant requests the abandonment of Solano Road from Broadway Avenue to 7th Avenue He presented the required statistical data and the recom- mendations of the Public Works department which were 1) the abandonment be approved subject to retaining 66' width for public utilities easement and subject to dedications to Broadway Avenue 2) if the abandonment were not approved, removal of encroachment of all property owners in order to develop an improved roadway down the middle of Solano which would require, also, the removal of power poles 145 Chairman invited comment in favor of the abandonment. 146 Terry Wilburn introduced himself as the applicant and described Solano as unwanted, unneeded, and dangerous. Access is available to all property owners from the other area roads. He pointed out that not only are there no stop signs or street signs on Solano, the subject portion of Solano is not even designated on the official street naming map of the city As the city engineer had indicated, there is a guide line actually intruding upon 7th Avenue _ 147 Lee Peterson introduced herself and indicated that when her fencing and mobile home were placed they had been approved by the county, the city had not yet come into existence. However, the city may have the additional 17 feet of easement. She stated the road serves no purpose since there is access from the other two lots to other public - roads As stated by Mr Wilburn, as taxpayers, the parties involved in this case do not care to pay for upkeep of an unnecessary road 148 Alan Drysdale introduced himself and expressed concern for his children's safety with current situation and stated that it would be to all the residents' benefit to have Solano abandoned He said he had an overhead camper that required extreme care when passing under the aforementioned guide wire 149 Kathy Wilburn introduced herself and agreed with the reasons for abandonment that had been presented and added that the intersection in question is only three homes from Starr. That adds to the danger since no one coming from Starr would expect another intersection so soon Page 13 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 150. Chairman invited comments in opposition to the application 151 Emily Cassady introduced herself as staff attorney at the Gila-Penal County Legal Aid Scoiety and representative of the Babors who are residents of the subject area and who oppose the abandonment She stated that Solano is the only means of access to the Babor property and they have planned the use of their lot accordingly She stat that where the other property owners have 33' of la gain by the abandonment of Solano, the Babors will lose ' their access and will be landlocked. It is hazardous —•— - -- - to use 7th Avenue as an accessway due to the existence of a utility pole guide wire in the middle of that roadway She stated that although the Babors do not want Solano abandoned, if it were to be abandoned they would request that an access be provided and 1) the guide wire be removed, 2) the area adjacent to the guide wire be graded by the city so that the Babors' lot was accessible from that point, 3) if water pipes were ruptured during grading, they be repaired at city expense 152 Chairman asked staff to summarize 153. Mr Bryant stated he had neglected to mention a petition had been received with 14 signatures requesting the abandonment He also stated he had met with a Salt River Project a.- w. . .a. representative, Dean Metcalf, at the subject property ° todaywho indicated that the utility y pole and guide wire could be moved south with no difficulty. Concerning the city grading an access for Mr Babor, normally it is the responsibility of the applicant if it were made a stipulation of the ruling 154 Ms. Taylor asked if the Babors could use Acacia at the South end of their property to get to 7th Avenue 155 Mr Bryant answered affirmatively and mentioned that an inquiry had been made by residents of Acacia to abandon Acacia from 7th Avenue to Broadway 156. Ms. Taylor asked where were people coming from the west onto 7th Avenue 157. Mr. Bryant replied they would be coming from Crotez. 158 Chairman recongized Ms Wilburn 159. Ms. Wilburn argued that the Babor property is accessible without the need for a four-wheel vehicle, as stated She said she had driven a small car through that suggested access- _._._-__-_._-___ - -- way 160 Mrs Drysdale introduced herself and expressed concern for her children's safety and expressed her opinion that 7th was more easily traversed than Broadway. She also commented that access by four-wheel drive was not necessary; that she had used her Mustang in that area 161. Ms Peterson stated that with the abandonment of Solano, parking for Mr Babor's church would be available and he would no longer have to ask to use his neighbors' properties for that purpose. 162. Ms. Cassady commented that 7th Avenue is being referred to as an existing street, but that it is merely a trail that graders have widened enough for one lane of traffic She replied that it may be possible to use the suggested area of access with a small vehicle if all conditions are good, but maintained that it would not be passable .f� ,. -' .- in bad weather The guide wire is the biggest hazard. Page 14 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 163 Ms Taylor asked for verification that 7th Avenue is one-lane 164. Mr Bryant stated it is not very wide, but is at least 20 feet wide so that two cars can pass 165 Mr Gero suggested that options be considered He suggested one option might be abandoning the lower half of Solano and leave the upper half as it is, creating a cul-de-sac This would eliminate the problem of through traffic 166 Ms Cassady reminded the Commission that the Babors request the guide wire be removed and the access be graded and the water lines be repaired, if ruptured, at no expense to the Babors. 167 Mr Gero asked the city engineer to verify that water lines in the public right-of-way, if ruptured by the city grader, would be repaired at city expense 168. Mr Bryant answered affirmatively 169 Ms Cassady responded that, before Solano is declared to no longer be a public right-of-way, the agreement for water line repairs be drawn 170 Mr Gero pointed out that if the option of a cul-de-sac were selected, her point would be nullified, that portion of the road would still be public right-of-way. • 171 Mr Bryant noted that Arizona Water Company informed Public Works, in writing, that none of their facilities are within this area 172 Mr Gero asked Mr Hare of Arizona Water Company, who was present in the audience, to comment on the location of the water meter 173 Mr Hare replied that four meters were located where the pole is in the public right-of-way, the south half of 7th Avenue 174 Mr Gero asked if they were to be moved from the public right-of-way and put on the private property at whose expense would that be - 175 Mr Hare stated that that would not be a practical solution Placing the meters just outside of the right-of-way and before the property lines, the cost would probably be a couple of hundred dollars 176. Mr. Gero responded that he was only concerned with advising the Commission and Council what would happen if the motor - - - grader breaks the meters or lines 177 Mr Hare stated that the water company was not difficult to deal with If lines were to be moved there would probably be no cost to anyone, if a main must be moved, some cost would be assessed 178 Chairman recognized Mr Drysdale 179. Mr. Drysdale commented that Mr. Babor had as much to gain as the other residents and that his property was accessible from other than Solano 180 Ms. Wilburn commented that Mr Babor is already using his easement of Solano. Page 15 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 181 Unidentified member of the audience suggested the pole be moved back, Solano be abandoned and this would eliminate the utility problems and would eliminate an unneeded road 182. Chairman closed the public hearing 183 Taylor/Baker M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commi of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the abandonment of Solano Road, as described, be recommended ---- - ,-- - for approval with the stipulation of good grading of 7th Avenue, and the removal of the guide wire " The motion passed unanimously. 184 Mr Gero noted that the "Minutes" of the last meeting referred to the Mesa Grande case being heard this evening, however, materials were not submitted in time to be placed on this meeting's agenda 185 Chairman continued the meeting to the next item of business, the application PZ-18-81 (Hare) PZ-18-81 was heard at the last meeting of the Commission and the public hearing was closed at that time & the issue was tabled To resume consideration of this item, syA... a w .w a motion must first be made to remove the item from table 186 Chairman entertained a motion to that effect 187 Kell/Baker M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that PZ-18-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 116, application of Robert Hare, be removed from table and be considered further at this time The motion passed 7-0-1, with Ms Taylor continuing her abstention due to a conflict of interest 188. Chairman being informed that the issue was tabled at the point of Commission discussion after public hearing was closed, asked if any member wished to make a motion to reopen public hearing He was informed this was not possibl without advertising. He requested a motion 189 Frank Burch a member of the audience, stated he had attended the previous meeting and asked that a time stipulation be placed on the applicant It was at that point the issue was tabled in order to pursue that possibility 190 Mr Kell attempted to state a point of order in that the public hearing was closed 191. Chairman stated, "The man is talking, let him talk " 192 Mr Burch quoted ARS 9/462-01B which states that "the City Council could conditionally approve a rezoning which condition would included a schedule of development of a specific use or uses for which the rezoning is requested Upon failure to meet the schedule for development the property would automatically revert to its former zoning classifi- cation without legislative action " He expressed he was not against the rezoning, he was against the lingering of a rezoning without development AIN Page 16 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 • 193. Mr Kell respectfully submitted that this was not a public hearing He pointed out that if Mr. Burch is allowed to continue then Mr Hare and the people from Mr Lake's office who represent him should have equal opportunity to speak. He pointed out that it was midnight and that the meeting had continued a very long time, the people had waited an incredible length of time for a ruling 194 Chairman asked all those in favor of closing off the public hearing by a show of hands (All other members raised --- _ ---- . their hands ) 195 Mr Burch asked for verification that a time stipulation could be be set 196. Chairman assured him that that could be part of the motion 197 Mr Burch attempted to conclude his narrative 198 Chairman interrupted by stating the public hearing was closed, that he had allowed Mr Burch to speak but was over- ruled by the other members 199 Mr Burch said that he had been told at the last meeting that he could return 200 Chairman told Mr Burch to not talk to him to talk to the other members who had made the decision to close the public hearing. A motion was requested 201 Kell/Hall M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-18-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 116, application of Robert Hare for his property which descrip- tion is a matter of record, requestina rezoning from General Rural to CB-2 General Businness Zone, approval be recommended to the Apache Junction City Council on said application. Reasons for this recommendation include, the area is a business opportunity area according to /1111S, the proposed General Plan " 202 Chairman yielded the gavel Stated that now the Commission is doing the opposite of what had been done a couple hours ago Where the applicant requesting a variance of what the proposed General Plan suggests had been denied, this application falls outside the suggested 200' corridor and, yet, the motion is for approval. 203 Mr Kell replied that the difference is that Mr Hare's application " ----.— - - - was submitted and was in public hearing before the recom- mendation was made and was tabled until the recommendation would be completed The other case came in after the recommendation had been made 204 Mr. Baljo reminded the Commission that the General Plan has not received final approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission He restated his opinion that it is invalid to base decisions on an unadopted plan. 205 Mr Kell responded that the decisions are not based on the proposed plan as it stands, but on the data gathered and information studied during the preparation of the proposed plan AIM, AOMOk. Page 17 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 206. Mr. Gero asked for clarification of the reasons for the motion He noted three 1) highway frontage was proposed as business opportunity area (highest and best use) 2) although the plan is unofficial, the studies indicate -: i; _', .r ^;,,� that the area would be business opportunity and general commercial (supportive) 3) application existing prior 1 to determining the recommendation (supportive). The Ao\ I Commission agreed with the summation i _ 207 Mr. Baljo pointed out that only 200' is recommended as commercial 208 Mr Gero commented that he thought the original concensus decision was, because the highway is skewed, property lines may be followed and if a substantial portion of the property I was within the 200' , the entire parcel may be zoned commercial 209. Mr. Baljo noted that a substantial portion of Mr Hare's parcel No. 1 does not lie within 200' of the highway 210 Mr. Gero advised that an amendment could be made at the Commissions' discretion that parcel No 2 could be approved and parcel No 1 not, or some such combination 211. Mr. Baljo suggested an amendment to the motion that parcel No 2 be approved and the portion of parcel No 1 falling within 200' of the highway be approved 212. Acting Chairman called for a second There was none :-- Called for a vote on the main motion. The motion passed I 5-1-2, with Mr Hutchens voting "present" due to absence at the last meeting, and Ms Taylor abstaining due to a conflict of interest 213. Chairman was returned the gavel. 214 Mr Kell asked to be excused from the balance of the meeting since he would need to abstain from this last case due to a conflict of interest 215 Chairman excused Mr. Kell after inviting him to stay for the a, .. nouncement of his resignation as chairman - - - Staff was asked to brief the Commission on PC-PZ-12-81 (Dickey). 216 Mr Gero noted that on Page 7 of the "Minutes" of the last meeting, the issue was tabled with a main motion on the floor "„,„.."" ...., -,'^m'^..""' Advised the Commission that a motion to remove the item _ from the table would be in order followed by consideration �' of the main motion. With a motion on the floor, the public hearing had been closed 1 1 217. Chairman called for a motion i 218 Taylor/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that PC-PZ-12-81, application of Harold Dickey, be removed from table " The motion passed 7-0-1, with Mr Kell abstaining due to ' a conflict of interest. 219. Chairman asked the Commission if the public hearing on this case should be reopened. No member desired the public hearing 1 to be reopened Asked to have the motion restated • Auk Adak Page 18 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1981 220. Ms Nendza read the motion from the "Minutes" of the previous meeting. 221 Chairman called for a roll call vote. The motion passed 5-1-2, with Mr Hutchens voting "present" due to his absence at the last meeting, and Mr Kell abstaining due to a conflict of interest. 222 Chairman announced he was stepping down as Chairman, but would serve as a member of the Commission. 223 Mr. Gero noted that the dates for the General Plan needed to be set by motion. He explained that the public hearing before the Commission could not be held until 60 days had expired from the time the plan is sent to those agencies required to review the plan He then outlined the tentative public hearing dates of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council January 12, 1982 Close of 60 Day Notice Period January 13, 1982 Informal Meeting Week of January 18 Public Hearing - - - February 3 & 17, 1982 City Council 224 Hutchens/Baker M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the dates for the General Plan be set as outlined at this meeting by staff The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 225 Chairman adjourned the meeting by concensus at 12 25 A M Respectfully submitted, Joe Ger Executive Secretary Approved /,‘ dt4 George Bbljo .. Chairman MINUTES • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA DECEMBER 8, 1981 730PM In Attendance Absent Guests George Baljo John Hutchens (attached) Roger Hall Richard Oltman Ron Kell Harry Polomskey Mark McPherson Ilene Taylor Mildred Baker, Acting Chairman Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance/Roll Call 1 Chairman initiated the meeting by responding to an incident of public criticism Her narrative explained to those in attendance the recent activities of the Commission, including the weekly study sessions and the Saturdays spent learning about zoning issues and considerations She commented that the • Commission might be "over-educated," but not in- competent " She commended the Commission members and hoped they would continue to vote their con- science and not be discouraged by public criticism asked if there were additions or corrections to the agenda There being none, she requested a motion to accept the agenda. 2 Kell/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the agenda be approved as presented'" The motion passed unanimously. 3. Chairman asked the Recording Secretary to call the roll. 4 Ms Nendza called the roll and determined seven members _ _ __ present and two members were absent, as indicated _ :. -._ above 5 Chairman stated the next item of business was to elect a chairman since Mr Baljo has submitted his resig- . :...�..•+ri: :,: ►,. .. . nation for personal reasons. However, she explained she had received several telephone calls from --— Commission members requesting the resignation not be accepted 6 Ms Taylor asked that Mr Baljo reconsider his submitted resignation 7 Taylor/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, does not accept the resignation of Mr Baljo as Chairman of the Commission " The motion passed 6-0-1, with Mr Baljo abstaining 8 Mr Baljo accepted the chairmanship with the stipulation that revisions to the Rules of Conduct for Commission meetings be considered in regard to participation by the chairman in meetings He asked for a show of hands by the other members who would be willing to consider such revisions. (All members raised their hand.) -- �>`- - - �a Page two - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 asked for a motion to accept the "Minutes" dated November 9, 1981. 9 Mr Kell commented that the "Minutes" in question should be titled "Land Use Planning Committee." • - ~- 10 Chairman requested a motion, there being no further comment 11 Kell/Baker M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the "Minutes" dated November 9, 1981, of the _ _-_.__..__..._____ Land Use Planning Committee be approved, as corrected." The motion passed 5-0-2, with Ms Baker and Mr McPherson voting "present" due to their absence at that meeting. 12 Chairman asked if there were comments concerning the "Minutes" dated November 10, 1981 There being none, he stated that he would prefer to listen to the tapes prior to signing the "Minutes " He cited specific items 9, 136, 137, 140, 188, 200, 202, 209, 223. 13 Baker/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning _ Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, A that the "Minutes" dated November 10, 1981, be tabled until the next regular meeting of the Commission. The motion passed unanimously 14. Chairman opened the public hearing for case PZ-4-81, Palm Springs He asked staff to brief the Commission 15 Mr Gero explained that the Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer requests (per memorandum distributed) additional time for studying issues and an example was cited to illustrate the need for further study It was mentioned that the proposed Ordinance was not approved as to form and the city attorney was asked for comment concerning this. 16 Mr Alexander noted that he had perused the proposed ordinance and was concerned with several matters These concerns were both legislative and definitional. 17 Mr Gero suggested a special meeting be held January 6, if the Commission cared to continue this hearing -•°^- -- This would allow the necessary additional time and would avoid meeting during the holidays He further _ — - _ suggested that someone from the Palm Springs Homeowners Association give a brief synopsis of the proposal for the benefit of the concerned citizenry 18. Chairman agreed with this final suggestion and expressed the opinion that, even if the hearing were to be continued, certain people should be allowed to express their views He invited the applicant to speak. 19 John Schmidt introduced himself as the president of the Palm Springs Homeowners Association Explained the difference between the original covenants and deed restrictions and the proposed planned development 20 Chairman called on Mr. Gardham to comment Page three - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 21 Mr Hardham noted that it was two years and three months ago that this was first discussed. He expressed awe at the length of time that has passed and encouraged expediency 22. Mr. Bal,7o relinquished the gavel to speak as a homeowner in the Palm Springs area At this point, he began a narrative of the intent of the proposal and its "- impact He expounded on various interest points home value, taxes, grandfathered rights. Heels invited questions 23 Bob Griffin introduced himself and requested the balance of the --- -- - ordinance be explained (lighting, etc ) 24. Mr. Baljo reminded Mr Griffin that a special meeting would be held January 6 with this item being the only one on the agenda Detailed discussion would take place then. He tried to briefly answer Mr Griffins inquiry. 25. Mr. Griffin stated he had a building that would be effected by the proposal in regard to side yard requirements 26 Mr Baljo suggested that a variance of one foot would be a matter for the executive board of the homeowners association. There being no further questions, staff was asked for comment. 27 Mr. Gero commented that the proposal had been adequately explained. He stated that he had extra copies of the draft ordinance for the executive Committee of the Palm Springs Homeowners Association Review of the draft has been scheduled for tomorrow 28 Mr Baljo called for a motion to table this item of business. 29 Baker/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of Apache Junction, Arizona, that it is hereby called a meeting for Wednesday, January 6, 1982, at 7 30 p m , in these council chambers for the purpose of and hereby continues this public hearing on rezoning case PZ-4-81 a commission Initiative at the request of the Palm Springs Homeowners Association " /R1 The motion passed 4-0-3, with Mr Hall, Mr. Kt..,, and Mr Baljo abstaining due to a conflict of interest. 30. Chairman accepted return of the gavel Asked staff to brief the Commission on the next case PZ-21-81 (Peck) 31 Mr Gero recounted the events leading to the continuation of this case from the last Commission meeting He detailed the required data and referred the Commission to information in their packets that was presented at the last meeting. 32 Chairman invited the applicant to comment 33. Vinton Peck introduced himself and said he had requested the rezoning because the property was adjacent to the school and multiple housing would be advantageous to teachers and more suitable to the area than single family units. 34 Chairman asked for comment in opposition, there being no comment in favor of the application 4Y �. •... y. -- � ,** Page four - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 35 Richard Taylor introduced himself and noted that fourteen of the seventeen property owners within the 300' limit had signed the petition to withdraw their signatures from the applicant's list of required signatures He stated they were opposed to the high density. _ 36. Chairman asked for further comment in opposition. There was none Staff was asked for comment 37 Mr Gero requested that the city attorney be asked to comment on how the public zoning ordinance is enforceable 38 Mr Alexander understood Mr Peck to suggest that he mould, by deed restriction, limit the utilization of the particular parcel He commented that in preparing its recommendation to the City Council, the Commission should be aware that the city cannot enforce deed restrictions in consideration of use 39 Chairman asked if there was rebuttal. 40 Mr Peck stated he did not expect his deed restrictions to be enforced by the city He stated further that the fact that he offered this should illustrate his goodwill in the matter He pointed out that only one of the people in opposition was present 41 Mr Taylor pointed out that he had notorized signatures of fourteen of the property owners He said other opponents were present, but did not wish to speak; a show of hands would indicate their presence 42 Chairman asked if there was a copy of this petition in the packets 43. Mr. Gero apologized that there was no copy in the packets that it was the same petition presented at the last Commission meeting Noted that this applicatior would need a unanimous vote by the City Council to be approved 44 Chairman inquired if this was because it met the 20% criteria of objection - - - 45 Mr Gero confirmed this 46. Chairman recognized Mr. Peck 47 Mr Peck registered his objection to the manner in which the petition in opposition to his application was submitted and felt this was a new hearing 48 Chairman explained that the hearing had been continued to this date in order that the applicant and those opposed to the application could study the information properly The petition withdrawing signatures was received at the last minute and the case was continued to ensure a fair hearing for all involved parties. 49 Mr Gero stated that he had just consulted with the attorney and it was felt that the petition does stand The Commission Initiative merely continued the public hearing and this is still the originally advertised case 50 Chairman closed the public hearing of PZ-21-81 and called for a motion 51. Mr. Kell requested he be able to ask Mr Peck a question r�_._.,..,.. Page five - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 52 Chairman granted the request 53. Mr. Kell wondered whysingle family 9 residence would not be practical for this site 54. Mr. Peck reasoned that the property backs up to the school and there are playgrounds and classrooms too near the property line � 55 Mr Kell asked if there were other single family resice in that area _ __-_-.. 56. Mr Peck answered affirmatively. Such residences exist to the north and to the west. He felt, however, that multiple Housing would be good in this area 57 Chairman called for a motion. 58. Kell/Polomskey M/S"BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission that in rezoning case PZ-21-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 121, application of Vinton Peck, for his property described as Lots 27 and 28, Superstition Homes Subdivision, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, re- questing zone change from GR (General Rural) to CR-5 (Multiple Residence Zone), the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application. The reasons being that most people living in the area having the opportunity to oppose the application do oppose it, and it would substantially raise the density • on those lots " The motion passed unanimously (7-0). 59 Chairman asked staff to brief the Commission on the next case, PZ-22-81 (Yoder), after a five-minute recess was called 60 Mr Gero outlined the required statistical data for the case 61 Chairman invited the applicant to speak 62. Dale Yoder introduced himself and explained he would to keep his pleasure horses on his property - - then deferred to his representative, Mr Talbott 63. Frank Talbott introduced himself and reiterated Mr Yoder's desire pointing out that the requested rezoning would be compatible with the surrounding area 64. Chairman asked staff for comment 65 Mr Gero called the Commission's attention to the memorandum in the packets from the Zoning Administrator 66 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for a motion. 1 67. Hall/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, in rezoning case PZ-22-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance 125, application of Dorothy Yoder, for her property the description of which is a matter of record, requesting zone change from TH (Trailer Homesite) to GR (General Rural), the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application The reasons being that it would be compatible with the area and the lot is large enough to meet health standards, and the zone would be low density and would create openess in the area." Page six - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 The motion passed unanimously (7-0). 68 Chairman asked the Commission to hear the Mesa Grande case next (PZ-24-82) due to the time 69. Mr. Gero noted that there were three items under "Communications, Awards, and Presentations " /0111‘" 70. Chairman withdrew his request and asked staff to continue 71 Mr Gero referred the Commission members to the copy of the "Proposed Airport Master Plan" which was distributed to them and advised that the Airport Commission requests a recommendation from the Commission by its January meeting. He then deferred to the City Attorney regarding signature removal on petitions 72 Mr Alexander explained that the Commission is empowered to act despite signature removal on petitions, if it feels so compelled According to the established rules, the Commission should not act, however, it does have the power to act. When the percentage requirement is met, the Commission is forced to act, without the requirement being met, the Commission has an option. - - 73 Chairman asked staff how such applications not meeting the 51% requirement had been handled in the past 74. Mr. Gero commented that when the applicant is unable to acquire the signatures the Commission has been asked to rule by Commission Initiative This is different from having acquired the required percentage and then having those signatures withdrawn. That situation occurred for the first time at the last Commission meeting 75 Mr Kell recounted that he had made the motion declaring the application null and void He wondered if that motion was legal 76 Mr Alexander stated that it should not have been worded in ,, such a manner as to eliminate Commission Juris- diction. He state further that the Commission can hear any petition, but is only forced to hear those meeting the 51% requirement 77 Mr Kell asked if the motion needed to be reworded at this time 78. Mr Alexander advised that the Commission may restate the _ motion noting that the 51% requirement used in the past was not fulfilled by this petition and the Commission therefore is not required to hear and rules to not hear the application 79. Chairman noted that the Commission had intended to move in such a way as to ensure a fair hearing. 80 Mr Kell clarified that the attorney was advising the motion be restated at this meeting 81 Chairman asked if the mition might be made at a later point on the agenda 82 Mr Gero proposed the motion be made under Item No 13, Information and Reports v 1 Auk Page seven - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 83. Chairman asked if there was anything further under the current item of business 84 Mr. Gero commented that the only other business under this Item was a request by Sierra Entrada that a Commission Initiative be authorized for the sub- division He further noted that, if the Commission decided to approve this request, several stipulations (which he outlined) were requested by staff 85 Chairman asked if it might be considered later on the ag J. 86 Mr Gero confirmed that it could be considered later 87. Chairman continued the meeting with the next case, PZ-24-82/ SUP-101-81 (Mesa Grande Corporation) Staff was asked to brief the Commission after he noted Item No 8 had been overlooked ("Call To The Public" there was none ) 88 Mr Gero recounted the events leading to the current status of the application 89 Chairman invited the applicant to speak. 90. Dean Ashworth introduced himself and the corporation's architect, Sarah Flores. He described the project in detail, expounding on the waste disposal consideration and . . _., mentioning an allowance granted for right-of-way along Lost Dutchman Boulevard - 91 Chairman asked staff for comment. 92. Mr. Gero noted the plan displayed by Mr Ashworth was the same as the one submitted a year ago He mentioned he did not see any right-of-way granted along Lost Dutchman Boulevard 93 Mr Ashworth commented that Mr. Gero was belaboring the point of the right-of-way since it had been made clear the righ-of-way would be granted Originally, it had not been allowed for due to a conflict with the waste disposal plans Those plans have since been altered and the right-of-way is no longer a prol�tem 94 Chairman recognized Mr. Kell. 95. Mr. Kell cited a conflict in that Mr Ashworth had stated a 40' right-of-way was being granted where the city had requested a 50' right-of-way .:.,,;.- •, ...,....14.40 ...,:,,, �, 96. Mr. Ashworth consulting with the architect said either 40' or 50' would be allowed; no problem existed either way. 97 Mr Kell stated the entire roadway would be a 100' right-of- way 98. Mr. Ashworth responded by stating "We will provide 50' " 99 Chairman recognized Mr Gero 100 Mr Gero outlined the city requirement for arterials and noted that Pinal County standards were the same 101. Mr. Ashworth commented that, if the Commission feels strongly on this issue, the corporation has no qualms in meeting the request 102. Chairman invited comment from staff 103. Mr Gero declined to comment s - 1 0.44 f ' "�' "" -.. •arm Page eight - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 104. Chairman recognized a member of the audience. 105 Ellen Gilligan introduced herself and noted that only 33' of her property must be surrendered, according to her deed This appeared to her to be in conflict with the 100' right-of-way being discussed, wouldn't she be re- quired to dedicate 50'? 106 Mr Gero asked if Ms. Gilligan lived on a corner lot with Lost Dutchman and Warner Drive 107 Ms Gilligan confirmed this. 108. Mr. Broman pointed out that Warner Road is not a section line road. He then explained that the additional footage required would be acquired by purchase, condemnation, or dedication at the time the roadway was fully improved. 109 Ms Gilligan wondered if residents adjacent to the Mesa Grande project would benefit from its water lines 110 Chairman asked the developer to respond. 111. Mr. Ashworth explained the water lines come from Meridian, through the project, and out on Ironwood. He then furthered the topic of right-of-way by commenting that Pinal County nor the State Land Department have never recommended right-of-way be provided in this area. -" '"" �► He stated the corporation has agreed to the right- of-way out of courtesy to the city 112. Ms. Gilligan asked if the rezoning would affect the zoning of her property 113 Chairman answered that it would not. 114 John Bradley introduced himself and expressed concern about the sewer system of the Mesa Grande project, the fact that he must dedicate 50' of right-of-way when his deed states only 33' need be surrendered, and he told the Commission he and his wife were not in favor of this project 115 Bill Beaulieu introduced himself and said he was speaking at the request of Mr. Ragan and Mr Bellucci. He stated that neither of these two men had objection to the project, but that they were very concerned about the right-of-way They want assurance of this right-of-way and that assurance has not been estab- lished yet He pointed out that Mr Ashworth's word that the right-of-way would be granted is not sub- stantial enough legally 116. Chairman asked for further comment in favor or opposition, there being none, staff was asked to comment 117 Mr Gero had no further comment 118. Chairman recognized Mr Bradley 119 Mr. Bradley reiterated the fact that he did not wish to sur- render the additional 17 feet of his property He noted the present zoning of his property allows for one residence per 1; acre, the Mesa Grande project would negatively affect density, in his opinion 120 Chairman recognized Mr Beaulieu Page nine - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 121 Mr Beaulieu asked Mr Gero to verify that the additional 17 feet of properties along Lost Dutchman would have to be surrendered regardless of approval or denial of the Mesa Grande application, should that arterial be fully improved 122 Mr Gero verified the standards and ordinances of the city do require the additional dedication as part °pike building permit process He was unsure of Pin, County requirements concerning the additional fuutage. He pointed out that there are two entrances to the ___.. .__. Mesa Grande project, he wondered if one entrance was 225' north of the intersection as recommended by the Director of Public Works 123 Mr Ashworth stated that it had been moved to the recommended location. 124. Chairman closed the public hearing and opened discussion by the Board 125. Mr. Kell asked Mr Ashworth if annexation into the city would be sought 126. Mr. Ashworth answered that there were no plans for annexation 127 Mr Kell requested staff to clarify what the recommendation by the Commission to Pinal County involves 128 Mr Gero detailed the first recommendation is whether Trailer Homesite and General Rural should be __.. changed to Mobile Home Park; second, the Special Use Permit would allow a commercial area, tennis, and recreational center, a golf course and club- house and a recommendation is sought whether to approve this. He further pointed out that should the Commission disagree with the ultimate decision of the county, an appeal could be filed since the state land involved is within one mile of the city 129. Mr Kell wondered if the state has approved of this project and has granted a lease and the zoning is being appropriately adjusted, or is the state awaitipo, the zoning determination 130 Mr. Gero deferred to the applicant. 131 Mr Ashworth explained that the lease was obtained under an existing zoning and mobile home units could be developed under that zoning The units were not miA00likaWili40 gf,I,Cri."•••• ••• —` '• M '"" developed because Pinal County was developing __ a new zoning ordinance He further explained that —` two procedures were required of the developer by the state certification must be obtained from the state in order to proceed with roads, sewer, water, paving, etc , then, coordination with governmental agencies within the area of the pro- ject (Pinal County and the city of Apache Junction). He stated a recommendation from Pinal County is required by the state; no recommendation from Apache Junction is necessary, but is sought as a matter of courtesy 132 Mr Gero asked what number of acres were zoned Trailer Homesite of the 139 acres 133. Mr. Ashworth responded that 60 acres were so zoned He commented that, because of Pinal County's zoning procedure changes, the corporation waited and then requested a total rezoning 134. Mr. Kell asked the consequences if Pinal County fails to Page ten - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981. 134. Mr. Kell (Cont'd.) grant the requested rezoning. 135 Mr Ashworth answered the corporation could not develop the project 136 Mr Hall inquired if Mr Ashworth's corporation was going to grant the 50' right-of-way 137. Mr. Ashworth "You've got it." 138 Mr Hall inquired if the entrance from Lost Dutchman Boulevard would comply with the recommendation stated in the memorandum from the Director of Public Works 139. Mr. Ashworth noted that it would be close with a few feet difference 140 Mr Hall inquired whether Arizona Water was bringing in the water lines. 141 Mr Ashworth responded that that was their source of water, but the lines would be built by the corporation 142. Mr. Kell expressed concern about density. .. •. -- 143 Chairman called for a motion 144 Kell/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, in rezoning case PC-PZ-24-81/SUP-101-81, application of Mesa Grande Corporation, the Commission recom- mends approval with the stipulation that concerns +l of the city (Items 1-4 of Page 1, Items 1-11 of Pages 1 and 2, and Items 1-2 of Page 3 of the December 11, 1980, letter to the Arizona State Land Department) be assured Specific concerns include Meridian Road right-of-way, Lost Dutchman Boulevard right-of-way, Ironwood Drive right-of-way, and other items included in the December 11, 1980, letter Also, those recommendations by the Acting Fire Chief in his memorandum of November 11, 1981, need to be assured The motion passed unanimously. 145. Chairman directed staff to brief the Commission on the next item of business, AB-81-7 146 Mr Gero recounted the case which had been tabled at the last regular Commission meeting One of the two parcels under one ownership would be landlocked by the proposed abandoment, but because of the single ownership that is irrelevant. 147. Chairman asked the applicant for further comment • ( 148 Mr Tandy had no comment. 149 Chairman invited a motion 150 Baker/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, in abandonment case AB-81-7, application of Jack Tandy, the Commission recommends approval of the resolution as written for the reasons that both are local streets on the street classification plan and access by them is not necessary and the proposed plan states that local streets may be considered for abandonment " The motion passed unanimously Page eleven - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 151 Chairman continued the meeting to New Business and asked staff to brief the Commission on PZ-6-81 (Roadhaven). 152. Mr Gero explained the obligation of the Commission con- cerning final approval of the planned development .__ and informing the developers that conformity has been determined elluN 153 Mr Kell asked staff to verify that the plans had been meticulously reviewed and found to be acceptable. 154. Mr. Gero referred to the materials in the members' packers confirming that to be so, including a memorandum from Mr. Leo Frazier. 155 Kell/Baker M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, in rezoning case PZ-6-81, application of Roadhaven Resorts, Inc , the rezoning having been approved to a Trailer Homesite by Planned Development Zone on July 15, 1981 , as set forth by Ordinance No 92, and which applicant is requesting final approval of the planned development that a it is shown by memorandum dated November 30, 1981 from Mr. Leo Frazier, Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer that he has reviewed the plans as required and has found them to be in substantial compliance, and b that the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the overall plan for development and finds the final proposal substantially in com- pliance with that approved by the City Council in approving this rezoning Therefore, the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission finds and grants approval to this final planned development application and authorizes the Zoning Administrator and City Engineer, to issue said permits, provided in their professional review they determine said application complies with the various codes and ordinances adopted by the Apah Junction City Council." �1 The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 156. Chairman directed staff to brief the Commission on PZ-2-81, Bullock 157 Mr. Gero explained that this was the same situation as the previous case and outlined the required data which __�_ _� ._ _ __.. was included in the members' packets. 158 Chairman called for a motion. 159. Hall/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-2-81, application of Keith Bullock, the rezoning having been approved to a Trailer Homesite by Planned Development Zone on April 15, 1981, as set forth by Ordinance No 88, and which applicant is requesting final approval of the planned development that a. it is shown by memorandum dated December 2, 1981, from Mr Leo Frazier, Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer, that he has reviewed the plans as required and has found them to be in substantial compliance, and ^1 Page twelve - Planning and Loning Minutes of December 8, 1981 159 Hall/Polomskey (Cont'd ) b that the Planning and Zoning Commission has • reviewed the overall plan for development and finds the final proposal substantially in compliance with that approved by the City Council in approving this rezoning. Therefore, the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning — Commission finds and grants approval to this final planned development application and authorizes the Zoning Administrator and City Engineer to issue said permits, provided in their professional review - they determine said application complies with the various codes and ordinances adopted by the Apache Junction City Council." The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 160 Chairman asked that the General Plan Schedule be discussed next 161 . Mr Gero noted that the schedule adopted at the last meeting needed to be amended due to a required mailing being delayed The recommended schedule, if approved, would be implemented by staff. • 162 Chairman asked if there was comment There being none, the recommended schedule was adopted by concensus. He directed staff to proceed to the next item of business. 163 Mr. Gero presented a verbal synopsis of the materials under Y "Information and Reports " He reminded the Cal- l( mission members that they still needed to act on the request by Sierra Entrada 164. Chairman asked if the applicant was available for comment 165 Bill McDaniel stated that he was not the applicant and was not present in any official capacity He introduced himself as a homeowner in Sierra Entrada and supported the application ^ 166. Chairman opened the topic for discussion among the Com- mission members - - - _ 167. Mr. Kell felt there should be no question of granting the request, the Commission had already set a prece- dent, in his opinion. 168. Kell/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that a Commission Initiative is hereby authorized for Sierra Entrada Garden Homes subject to the city • attorney approving the form of the proposed ordi- nance and the homeowners' association supplying the city a list of property owners within the subdivision and 300 feet beyond Further, the staff upon receipt of the property list and an approved as to form ordinance shall advertise the case for public hearing at the earliest legal opportunity, as scheduling permits " The motion passed 6-0-1, with Mrs Baker abstaining due to a potential conflict of interest. 169 Chairman expressed the opinion that his is a step forward in good planning for Apache Junction Staff was requested to continue with the next issue z . Page thirteen - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 170 Mr Gero noted the motion on the Herschall Wilson case needed to be reconsqdered, as suggested by the city attorney earlier in this meeting I 171 Chairman said he would entertain a motion to withdraw the original motion on the Wilson case. f 172 Taylor/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zonin Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Ari that the original motion made concerning case PZ-19-81 (Wilson) be reconsidered " The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 173. Chairman invited a new motion for PZ-19-81 174 Mr. Kell explained the intent of his original motion and stated he was unsure how to amend it properly. 175 Mr. Gero suggested it be stated in the motion that the original motion has been withdrawn and in lieu of that is the following motion The motion, as suggested by the city attorney could then be taken from the taped recording of this meeting 176 Mr. McDaniel offered a paraphrase of the attorney's suggestion that insomuch as people withdrew their names, the Commission is refusing to hear the case based on the fact that it normally hears those meeting the 51% requirement. 177 Kell/Baker M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that having withdrawn the original motion in case PZ-19-81, application of Herschall Wilson, the following motion is substituted in lieu thereof that, insomuch as the withdrawal of signatures eliminates compliance to the 51% requirement, and insomuch as the Commission normally hears cases meeting the 51% requirement, the Commission refuses to hear this case " The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 178. Chairman asked if there was further business 179. Mr. Gero called the members' attention to the booklet from the Airport Commission and requested they be pre- pared to make a recommendation at the next meeting — ____ _ - 180 Chairman called for a motion to adjourn 181. Taylor/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this meeting be adjourned " IThere was no objection to the motion and the meeting was thereby adjourned at 11.00 p m 0/11N raw �,.�.,.R� -xY.._...,....y...,rwr•A.•..�.�r,.»�-ram Page fourteen - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1982 Respectfully submitted, Joe G ro Executive Secretary Approved. • eorge aljo Chairman OIN • p Addendum Sheet - Planning and Zoning Minutes of December 8, 1981 Guests Guests John Card Donna Tandy Jacqueline Card Jim Fickas E. Slovinski Jack Tandy Ann Slovinski Keith Stachar R.G. and Cindy Smyers Frank Talbott - • Charles T. and Cheryl Bullard Richard Taylor Mrs M Baljo Harry Bidwell Bill Beaulieu George W. Hewitt Liv Beaulieu Mildred D. Hewitt Vinton M Peck Gordon R Stew Robert Griffin Dale and Dorthy Yoder _ Tony Jehon Dale Burfiend Charles Turner Ellen Gilligan Henry Turner Richard Gilligan Orma K. Ramirez Bernie O'Keefe Adelle D'Luge Braun Sue Franklin Jane George Joan A Spelle Bessie Stribrsky Pat Carter Anna Emily Bolma Eve Gardom ; Sylvia Rika Marge Schmidt Della L Michela Sam Gardom John L. Bradley Lillian Robinson Rusty Bradley Opal Hansen Catherine Powell _ ._ Fred Powell Councilmembers and Staff Wendell Clarke, Mayor Jimmy S Eidson, Councilmember Roy Hudson, Councilmember Bill McDaniel, Acting City Manager Leo Frazier, Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer David Alexander, City Attorney • i __ Adak PQACHF✓ O =,44)45:! i �!PlEli ' z '�R�ZONP COity o5 4pache 09unction January 14, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER LG' L. FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING/EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT. TRANSMITTAL OF "MINUTES" Attached are copies of the approved "Minutes" from the November 9, 1981 , meeting of the Land Use Plan Committee. Questions should be directed to the Executive Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please have the original "Minutes" inserted into the "Minutes Book" with Planning and Zoning Commission "Minutes." Thank you. JWG:rin 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 I _ MINUTES LAND USE PLANNING COMMITTEE 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA NOVEMBER 9, 1981 6 00 P M '--- -•- == In Attendance Absent George Baljo, Chairman Mildred Baker (illnes^ Roger Hall Dale Burfiend Jack Hutchens Ben Honor (business) Ron Kell Earl Laabs (out-of-town) Mark Mc Pherson Harvey Long (out-of-town) Jim Swanson Richard Oltman (business) Ilene Taylor Harry Polomskey (business) Hank Steelsmith, Liason Joe Gero, Executive Secretary Charles Newcomer, Associate Planner Becky Nendza, Recording Secretary Jackie LeCount, Clerk-Typist 1 Chairman called the meeting to order at 6 00 p m , and requested the Recording Secretary to call the roll 2 Ms Nendza called the roll noting as above those members present and those absent Where members had " ���► previously indicated absence for reason it was so noted 3. Chairman acknowledged a quorem present He stated the purpose of this special meeting, which has been properly advertised, is to consider the Committee's recommendation with regard to the draft of the Apache Junction 2001 General Plan 4 Kell/Swanson Moved and Seconded, BE IT RESOLVED by the SpecialLand Use Committee to approve and publicly present those reports which have been recommended for approval by Committee consensus concerning the Apache Junction 2001• General Plan including attachments, maps, graphics, and slide show the motion passed unanimously 5. Kell/Hutchens Moved and Seconded, BE IT RESOLVED by the Special Land Use Committee that this meeting -A- is recessed until 7.00 p.m. this date. --- — ---- - - the motion passed unanimously 6 Kell at 7 00 p m , noted that this is the time for the public presentation by the Special Land Use Committee of the Apache Junction 2001. General Plan. 7 Committee proceeded to present the prepared General Plan which is now on tape (video and sound track) 8 Committee concluded its presentation and adjourned at 9.00 p m. Panning and Zoning Commission "Minutes" November 9, 1981 • Page Two Respectfully submitted, Joseph W Gero Executive Secretary Approved. 1'4 Georg��a B'al jo Chai rman • `Oit a (94pache 2unction INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: January 12 , 1982 TO: Director of Public Works THRU• FROM: Operations Supervisor . SUBJECT: Decembers Activity Report (Summary) Attached for your information is the Operations Summary Activity Report for the month of December 1981 . Anyone wishing to see a more descriptive weekly break- down may do so ; the report is on file in the Operations Supervisor ' s office . DD/cc OPERATIONS ACTIVITY REPORT FOR DECEMBER 1981 Blade Results Miles Week of December 5 , 1981 11 . 7 Week of December 12 , 1981 7 . 9 Week of December 19 , 1981 11 . 4 Week of December 26 , 1981 10 . 1 Total 41 . 1 Requests Handled Complex 22 Citizens 21 Total 43 Projects Completed Sidewalks completed east end of Community 1 Services Building Cleaned Median 60 & 88 Intersection 1 Put Up Christman Tree 1 Total 3 Signs Repaired or Replaced Stop Signs Repaired 6 Yield Signs Installed 2 Dead End Signs Installed 4 Street Signs Repaired 5 Street Signs Installed 35 Total 52 Streets Swept Week of December 5 , 1981 6 . 3 Week of December 12 , 1981 (* • 7) Week of December 19 , 1981 (* • 3) Week of December 26 , 1981 (* • 4) Total 6 . 3 * ( Intersections) Trash , Trees , and Brush Picked Up Yards 70 Loads of 350 cubic yards of trash, 350 cu. trees and brush Total 350 cu. Patching ,... Week of December 5 , 1981 6 . 0 Week of December 19 , 1981 2 . 6 Week of December 26 , 1981 2 . 0 Total 10 . 5 Shoulders Bladed Week of December 5 , 1981 5 . 5 Week of December 12 , 1981 .0 Week of December 19 , 1981 .0 Week of December 26 , 1981 . 0 Total 5 . 5 Mowing Miles Week of December 5 , 1981 .0 Week of December 12 , 1981 . 0 Week of December 19 , 1981 3 . 0 Week of December 26 , 1981 . 0 Total 3 . 0 PQACHF GZ U 7 11 M. w l I4 Z r '�R�ZONP C6itt o padre cOuncti CGon January 11, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS •..22.:,; . 5 FROr: _)COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT. SALVATION ARMY ACTIVITIES For your information, I would like to give you an update on the Salvation Army activities during the past two months . During November through the Community Services Office, the Salvation Army was able to assist 25 families with grocery vouchers redeemable at a local grocer . During December, sixteen families were given assistance . This was in addition to approximately fifty families who were given food baskets between December 21 and December 24 Thirty-two baskets came from the Salvation Army, the remainder from individuals who gave food items to this office for distribution. The fifty families were also able •_ to pick out toys for each child in the family . (Toys being donated to our office also ) Our office is currently working with other providers , service organizations, and churches to establish a year round. food bank. The Community Services Department would be involved only in helping to coordinate if this project gets off the ground. As I stated above, this is for your information only, but I will be glad to answer any questions you may have . JB/ss 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 P?ACHF4( All- ✓ Z c6 t2 U q,p�ZONP � � &4pache 09unctian �•. January 6, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THROUGH. BILL MCDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER 4,'E FROM: jtt,O JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING C��CHUCK NEWCOMER, ACTING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUBJECT: FOR YOUR INFORMATION - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT At the January 4, meeting of the Board of Adjustment, the following public hearings were held and actions taken. BA-7-81 (Sieberz) Applicant was granted a variance to yard setback requirements of the GR zoning district based on site topography and reduction of flood hazard potential . BA-9-81 (Vestal ) Applicant was granted a nine month temporary permit to place a second mobile home on the subject property ,.nk to house the applicant's elderly and ill parents . BA-10-81 (Crossroads Baptist Church) Applicant was granted a variance to yard setack requirements of the GR zoning district to place a temporary trailer unit on the subject site to serve as office and Sunday School space. BA-11-81 (Griffin) Applicant was granted a variance to minimum lot area per dwelling unit requirements of the CR-5 zoning district to construct 5, one-story, one-bedroom apartments on the subject property. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 MEMORANDUM - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT Page two BA-12-81 (Short) Applicant was granted a variance to yard setback requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance due to the small lot size and site drainage. Also attached are the "Minutes" of the December 7, 1981, meeting. Originals of the "Minutes" should be placed in the minute book in the City Clerk's office. Pik OIN MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA DECEMBER 7, 1981 In Attendance Absent Guests Mr. Burfiend None Donna Hopper n t Mrs Luddy Herman Hopper Mr Morrison Georgia Robertson Mrs. Oberg George Luddy Mr Vaughn, Vice Chairman — -- - Mr. Jessamine, Chairman Chuck Newcomer, Executive Secretary Becky Nendza, Recording Secretary 1. Chairman opened the meeting at 7 00 p.m. and asked the Recording Secretary to call the roll 2 Ms Nendza did so and determined all members were present 3 Chairman requested a motion for approval of the "Minutes" dated November 16, 1981 4 Vaughn/Luddy "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the "Minutes" of the special meeting of November 16, 1981, be accepted as written " The motion passed 5-0-1, with Mr. Morrison abstaining due to his absence at the meeting 5 Chairman introduced the next agenda item, BA-7-81 (Sieberz), and asked staff to brief the Board 6 Mr Newcomer detailed the required data and explained the applicant is seeking a variance to yard setback requirements in order to place a trailer according to the plot plan included in the Board packets. The reason for so placing the trailer is the location of 4leekes Wash on the property which puts the present trailer site in a floodway 7. Chairman invited the applicant to speak 8 Georgia Robertson introduced herself as representative for the applicant who lives out-of-state She explained that the variance is sought for the safety of the trailer and its residents 9 Chairman invited questions from the Board members 10 Mr. Burfiend commented that trailers placed in flood zones should be placed on caissons or have retaining walls constructed to protect them and that this should be a requirement of the zoning ordinance. 11. Chairman asked for public comment in favor or opposition There was none Staff recommendation was requested 12 Mr Newcomer noted that the recommendation of the Zoning Administrator was included in the members' packets He proceed to read the memo into the "Minutes." The memo recommended approval of the variance due to the flood problem being due to topography, the applicant's attempt at resolving the matter uses sound construction practices, and the likelihood of the roadway most affected ever being developed is remote ' ---_ - -- - Page 2 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of December 7, 1981 13. Mr. Morrison asked for clarification of "Collector Street " 14 Mr Newcomer explained that a collector street is meant to take traffic out of a local neighborhood area and route 1 it onto an arterial street - a major street for collecting traffic out of or into a neighborhood _�a;,t .� , � s. M � .;x area He pointed out the definition could be found in the Street Classification Plan of the city _ _ Arterials are the busiest, collectors being the id order volume of traffic, and local streets provio access to individual homes -- ——---- -- 15 Mr Morrison stated he could not find the subject property. 16. Mr. Burfiend reported that the sign was down _ 17 Mr Newcomer said he had posted a sign at the corner of Cody Street 18. Mr. Vaughn asked for verification that the mobile home is currently situated as shown on the diagram in his packet 19. Mr. Newcomer deferred to the applicant's representative, Ms Robertson 20 Ms. Robertson said that there could be a mobile home there now, but she was unsure of its location. - � ';_ 4.--;..,� Y- :.u;:Wns.0 21 Mr Newcomer acknowledged that there was a trailer there when he inspected the property fifteen days ago, although it was not hooked up ~-- 22 Mr Vaughn asked if this trailer was "grandfathered " I 23 Ms Robertson replied that both 14 acre lots' trailer spaces were grandfathered 24. Mr Vaughn inquired concerning the setbacks for the grandfathered spaces 25. Mr. Newcomer noted that the present trailer sits back further than 10, probably about 20-25' ,olliN 26. Mr. Morrison asked for clarification of "grandfathered" rights 27 Mr Newcomer answered that the city passed an ordinance concerning grandfathered rights and a trailer in place in 1979 would be protected by the grandfathering 28 Chairman asked Ms Robertson if the trailer could be moved forward. �_ 29. Ms. Robertson responded that it would not be possible due to Weekes Wash. 30. Mr. Burfiend restated his opinion that, if trailers in flood zones would be placed on caissons or behind retaining walls, such cases would not be coming before the Board. 31 Ms Luddy pointed out that on the bus tour for the proposed General Plan it was mentioned that a major problem was blockage by residents of washes, forcing water into streets and neighboring properties Washes need to be kept open and flowing 32. Mr. Morrison asked if the applicant was aware of the effect having a trailer in a flood area has on insurance j 4V60,402g-a3.r s:+n ai r,W`!•O .0.i r:..z;. 1 I rok �,, ,;,,_•._., ,;, ,,�. a Page 3 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of December 7, 1981 33. Ms. Robertson answered that the applicant was knowledgeable on this issue She repeated the applicant's objective is to increase safety of his property 34. Mr Morrison inquired if the proposed General Plan specified what could be built in a floodplain. 35 Mr Newcomer replied that that was not addressed directly in the General Plan. 36 Mr Morrison expressed concern that a trailer be placed in lr the wash area 37 Mr Newcomer responded that the trailer would be required to be placed above the flood elevation on the property 38 Mr Vaughn referred to the packet diagram of the property and asked the distance from the patio to the edge of Weekes Wash 39 Mr. Newcomer replied that the distance shown on the diagram (230') was probably accurate to the drainage- way itself He further explained that beyond the drainageway is the floodway, the distance of which from the patio could not be defined since it depended on the amount of rain 40 Mr Vaughn stated that to the actual drainageway, itself, - the distance is approximately 230' 41 Mr Newcomer agreed. 42. Chairman commented that the lower portion of the property cannot be used, then, due to the floodplain 43 Ms Robertson verified this. 44 Mr. Newcomer suggested a recess be granted for the Board to review the additional materials provided by the applicant's representative 45. Chairman reconvened the meeting after a five-minute recess. He explained that the factor of safety is well-received He further detailed the setbacks from existing roads and explained that, although not currently used much, it may be well-travelled in the future He stated the Board feels the setback should be 20' from at least one of these roads (either Cody or Wickiup). Since 20' from the roadway would place the trailer in jeopardy of floodwater from Weekes Wash, he _ , asked if the trailer could be moved 20' South of Cody 46 Ms Robertson asked if she could view the property to perform measurement and confer with the applicant before committing an answer !!! 47. Chairman reasoned that, if there was no hurry, the property could be viewed by the Board with this new concept in mind. 48 Mr Vaughn wanted to know if the size of the trailer could be limited from 14X60 instead of 14X70 II Page 7 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of December 7, 1981 99. Chairman noted that that was true, but a time could be allowed to change the situation 100. Ms Luddy said the time element seems to need clarifi- cation Six months seemed reasonable in her opinion 101. Chairman agreed �\ 102 Mr Morrison wanted to know how far from the applicant► property line it was to another structure - •- - 103 Mr Hopper told him it was approximately 100' 104 Mr Morrison felt it should be taken into consideration that there was no road or anything with which the noncompliance would conflict 105. Chairman pointed out that the applicant only indirectly self-imposed this problem since the tenant was the actual producer of the noncompliance 106. Mr. Vaughn asked if the applicant had obtained a permit when he placed his own mobile home 107. Mr Hopper answered "no," that a permit was required only for the septic tank 108. Mr. Vaughn replied that, although not enforced, permits had been required since 1964 109 Mr Hopper pointed out that he was not opposed to complying. it only would be a hardship on the tenant. 110 Chairman asked if the tenant could afford to move the trailer. Advised applicant that, if this variance was approved, there would be discon- tent among adjacent property owners, and an undesirable precedent would be set He asked for verification that the applicant was asking that once the tenant leaves the variance would remain. 111. Mr. Hopper replied that a stipulation should be set^ that would not happen - 112. Chairman asserted that it would be pragmatic to grant six months for removal of the trailer. 113. Mr Vaughn declared that the ultimate hardship is only being prolonged 114 Ms Luddy noted that the applicant has not confirmed that there would be a financial hardship for the tenant to move the trailer, but the time would allow for arrangements to be made. 115 Mr Vaughn pointed out that in six months the cost to the tenant will have increased 116. Mr. Hopper brought to the Board's attention that the reason the cease and desist order had not been strenously enforced was there was no threat to safety or health. The only violation is that the trailer sits too close to a property line which is 100' from another mobile home Page 4 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of December 7, 1981 49. Ms Robertson preferred to measure the property for this suggested site 50. Mr. Burfiend reminded the Board that the Zoning Administrator agreed with the proposed relocation of the trailer and opined that Cody would probably not be developed He suggested approval of the application r [f 51 Chairman called for a motion. 52 Luddy/Oberg M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that case BA-7-81 be continued until the next regular meeting of the Board, January 4, 1982 " • The motion passed 5-1 with Mr Vaughn voting no 53 Chairman after a suggested meeting of the Board with Ms Robertson to view the property was determined to possibly be illegal due to a quorem being present, it was decided that the members would go individually to inspect the site The next item of business was requested. 54 Mr Newcomer briefed the Board on case no BA-8-81 (Hopper). 55. Chairman asked the applicant to comment 56 Mr Herman Hopper introduced himself and explained that the mobile home and septic tank were placed with the expectation of dividing the parcel into two lots However, that was never done and cannot now be done 57. Ms. Luddy asked when the trailer was placed 58 Mr Hopper stated he had nothing to do with setting the trailer, but had only rented the property. He noted that he had not researched the zoning requirements 59. Ms. Luddy asked him to verify that the date the mobile home was placed was January 21, 1981 60 Mr Hopper said he believed that date was accurate 61 Mr Vaughn asked if a building permit was obtained _ _ _ 62 Mr Hopper replied that the tenant had not obtained a building permit 63. Mr. Vaughn asked staff whose responsibility it was to obtain the permit 64 Mr Newcomer replied that the ultimate responsibility was the property owner's However, a rental agreement between the property owner and the renter could establish the responsibility upon the renter 65 Mr Vaughn inquired of Mr Hopper if such an agreement existed. a £. N*.. r.. Page 6 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of December 7, 1981 • 81. Ms. Luddy commented that, to her understanding, the applicant did have a chance to rectify the • situation, having been served with notice nearly a year ago. She also pointed out that, according to information in the Board packets, it is unlawful to grant a variance • wrap. when the non-compliance is self-imposed as �- = -- �— in this case 82 Chairman stated that he is not recommending approve ,, , the variance, but is suggesting a length c time be granted for resolving the problem. 83 Ms Luddy cautioned concerning the legality of granting a variance 84 Mr Hopper detailed the actions taken in the past several months and reiterated the information presented in the Zoning Administrator's memorandum. He stated that he realized that, although the slab was placed in accordance with county specifications year ago, it would have to be redone now that the city has incorporated However, he was unaware that the tenant was not in compliance when the trailer was placed and only acted after the tenant informed him of the problem 85. Ms. Luddy asked if the tenant placed the correct size of trailer for the existing slab 86. Mr. Hopper replied that the trailer was larger than the slab. 87 Chairman asked if the trailer was now the applicant's 88. Mr. Hopper answered that it was not, he only rented the lot 89. Chairman noted that, if the variance is not granted, it is the tenant's responsibility to move the trailer or bring it into compliance 90. Mr. Vaughn pointed out that the 20' requirement was established in 1974 and the slab never le y met this stipulation = 91. Mr. Burfiend asked if there was a lease for a specified period of time 92 Mr. Hopper answered negatively 93 Mr Burfiend wondered what cost would be involved to the — --- - - - tenant, if the trailer must be moved 94. Mr Hopper was unable to estimate the cost, but indicated what steps would be necessary. 95 Chairman restated his opinion that a reasonable length of time be granted the applicant to rectify the situation 96 Mr Vaughn replied that thirteen months had already passed 97 Mr Burfiend restated that five years would be no hardship on Apache Junction. 98 Mr Vaughn stated that five years would set a precedent and granting the variance would be breaking the law. Page 5 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of December /, 1981 • 66. Mr. Hopper answered "no." 67 Ms Luddy asked who placed the cement slab and when it was placed. 68 Mr. Hopper answered that the slab was placed prior to the setting of the trailer, but he was unsure of A _ the date. He was sure, however, that it was F ! poured prior to incorporation of the city 69 Ms Luddy pointed out that, according to the information received by the Board, the slab was not in before 1979 But that in a 1980 aerial photo, the slab was in 70 Mr. Vaughn asked staff if the photographs could be viewed by the Board 71 Mr. Newcomer answered affirmatively and requested a short break to acquire them 72 Mr Burfiend noted that the date the slab was placed was not relavant 73 Chairman granted a recess. 74. Chairman reconvened the meeting after a ten-minute recess — during which the Board members examined the aerial photographs Staff was asked to read the memo from the Zoning Administrator 75 Mr Newcomer read the memo which stated that the mobile home had apparently been placed in November 1980, a complaint was received in January, 1981 Researching the permits, it was discovered none had been issued and a cease and desist order was issued. A permit application was submitted and denied due to insuffieient setbacks In April, 1981, a variance application was submitted, but was returned as incomplete. No further action was taken until November, 1981 when the current application was processed 76. Mr Burfiend suggested that a variance be granted for a period of five years to allow the property owner and the tenant time to rectify the situation 77. Mr Vaughn asked staff if the trailer had been occupied since January 78 Mr Newcomer replied that the mobile home was placed sometime at the end of 1980 79. Mr Vaughn expressed surprise that the trailer could be occupied for such a long period of time after issuance of a cease and desist order 80 Chairman stated that Apache Junction is new, and changes by residents are going to be necessary to conform to zoning regulations However, this will take time and, when discrepancies are unintentional, cooperation between the city and those in conflict with the regulations shoulc be achieved Therefore, it was suggested the applicant be allowed reasonable time to rectify this situation. • Page 8 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of December 7, 1981 117 Luddy/Oberg "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby denying the requested variance to yard setback requirements fo the GR zoning district of the City of Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance in • case BA-8-81 for the property legally described -, :„- ;;.w-. as the Southwest ; of the Northeast 4 ofie Northwest ; of the Southwest ; of th��th- west o of Section 17, Township 1 Nor, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian The Board bases its decision on the following ...... .. reasons 1) Under Section 9-462.06H.2 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, if the Board finds that the circumstances are self-imposed by the property owner, the Board is expressly prohibited by law from granting a variance However, the Board rules that the applicant is not in violation until after six (6) months (This motion is the amended version. Ms. Luddy had read the suggested motion for the pre- ceeding case in error, but corrected herself - - - --- - when staff called her attention to the mis- reading ) • The motion passed 3-1-2, with Mr Burfiend and Mr Vaughn abstaining 118 Chairman there being no further business, adjourned the meeting by concensus at 8.30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, (,/) arl es Ne4}A/AA___— wcSomer - �,- ,.,- .,,,,w,w Acting Executive Secretary Approved• c o samine, Chairman / / L/ • - AM ilk Ad.Ikk CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF January 5, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION 1/5/82 THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE PLACEMENT OF AGENDA ITEMS #9 AND #10 WHICH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE REVERSE OF THEIR Ink PRESENT ORDER. (motion carried. ) THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1981 , BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LOCATION TRANSFER OF A SERIES 14 LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS BY JOSEPH T. BONFANTE, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED Letters sent FOR APPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSE 1/8/82 AND CONTROL. (motion carried. ) C.C. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 81-21, A RESOLUTION- OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT PORTION OF NORTH GOLD DRIVE AND WEST SMOKETREE STREET DESCRIBED HEREIN, FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENTS, ARE HEREBY ABANDONED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUT RESERVING UTILITY Planning Recorded with EASEMENTS, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. (motion carried. ) Pinal County 1/11/82 THAT ORDINANCE NO. 120, BE AND HEREBY IS, REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. (motion carried. ) THAT THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY ASSOCIATION FOR THE DONATION OF THE APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY BUILDING AND FIXTURES LOCATED AT 122 .n. EAST SECOND AVENUE, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, WHOSE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS: LOTS 50 AND 51 , APACHE JUNCTION PLAZA, ACCORDING TO BOOK 10 OF MAPS, PAGE 41 OF PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, BE AND HEREBY IS ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE DIRECTED TO DESIGNATE FUNDS FROM FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT NO. 005-105-512-06-73 FOR THE MAINTENANCE, UPKEEP AND RELATED PAYROLL EXPENSES OF SAID LIBRARY IN THE AMOUNT OF $11 ,930.00 AND FROM Appropriate GENERAL FUND NON-DEPARTMENTAL ACCOUNT #001-105-512- funds made 06-35 FOR UTILITY COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $720.00. C.M. available. THAT THE LIBRARY CONTRACT AGENDA ITEM, BE AND HEREBY IS, REMOVED FROM THE TABLE (motion carried. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO FURTHER STUDY THE QUESTION OF ANNEXATION OF THE PROPOSED AIRPORT PROPERTY AND REPORT TO THE COUNCIL THEIR FINDINGS WITHIN THE NEXT SIX P.W. MONTHS. (motion carried. ) Planning CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF January 5 , 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE AIRPORT COMMISSION BE AND HEREBY IS, DIRECTED TO ASSIST THE PLANNING AND will be studied ZONING COMMISSION IN THEIR STUDY AS MAY BE APPROPRIAT:. P.W. for six months. (motion carried. ) Planning — THAT THE APACHE JUNCTION AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AND SITE SELECTION STUDY AND REPORT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE AIRPORT COMMISSION , BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT THE AIRPORT COMMISSION TO CONTINUE TO CO-ORDINATE AND STUDY AS MAY BE APPROPRIATE, TO DETERMINE LAND ACQUISITION COSTS, FUNDING ALTERNATIVES, PUBLIC REACTION AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INTEREST, SO THAT INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION UPON THE APPROVAL OF AIRSPACE FROM THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION . (motion carried. ) P.W. THAT THE AGENDA ITEM ON LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT BE AND HEREBY IS, TABLED. (motion carried. ) THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BE AND HEREBY IS, DIRECTED THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO CO-ORDINATE AS NECESSARY TO REQUEST THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO IMPLEMENT A SPEED TEST THROUGH THE CITY LIMITS. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT: 1 . THE SPEED TEST INCLUDE AREAS BETWEEN MERIDIAN DRIVE AND ROYAL PALM ROAD. 2. THE SPEED LIMIT BE POSTED AT 35 MPH. 3. THE SPEED TEST BE IMPLEMENTED IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE OF THE ADDITIONAL VOLUME OF TRAFFIC CREATED BY THE WINTER VISITORS IN THE LOCALE. 4. THE SPEED TEST BE IN EFFECT FOR A MINIMUM OF 120 DAYS. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , BE AND HEREBY IS, -DIRECTED THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURE TO ENFORCE THE TEST SPEED LIMIT BY ISSUING WARNING CITATIONS TO VIOLATORS. AT THE END OF THE TEST PERIOD, THE COUNCIL REQUESTS REPORTS FROM THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION direction given AND THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , EXPLAINING P.W. to P.W. and THE RESULTS OF THE TEST AND PROVIDING APPROPRIATE C.M. P.S. accordingly RECOMMENDATIONS. (motion carried. ) P.S. (\DOT contacted. THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON JANUARY 19, 1982, AT 6:00 P.M. C.C. Posted 1/7/82 CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF January 5, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT RESOLUTION NO. 81-25, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, EXPRESSING THAT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION DOES ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE PINAL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Advertised in TO ALLOW UP TO 25 LOW-INCOME HOUSING UNITS TO BE legal ads 1/12/82 CONSTRUCTED IN APACHE JUNCTION, BE AND HEREBY IS Letters sent APPROVED. (motion carried. ) Planning 1/8/82 THAT RESOLUTION NO. 81-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, Advertised in ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS; AND egal ads 1/12/82 DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. C.C. (motion carried. ) THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD IN THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY HALL COMPLEX ON JANUARY 9, 1982, AT 8:00 A.M. , FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING PERSONNEL AND LEGAL MATTERS. (motion carried. C.C. Posted 1/7/81 THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:20 P.M. (motion carried. ) CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING DECEMBER 16, 1981 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO CHECK INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF USING 10% OF EXCESS BUILDING FEES City Attorney TO GO TO THE SWIMMING POOL FUND. (Mayor Clarke) C.M. checking legal CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS ACTION NOT COMPLETED MEETING ACTION DATE REQUEST AGENCY STATUS November 18, 1981 THAT 90 DAYS PRIOR TO AWARDING THE INSURANCE COMPANY NEXT YEAR AN ADVERTISEMENT BE RUN IN THE PAPER SOLICITING BIDS FROM ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES THAT .•. MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN PROVIDING LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION. C.C. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROVID: COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH A PROPOSED CALENDAR OUTLINING INITIAL STEPS TO FRAME A CHARTER FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION NO LATER THAN AUGUST 1 , 1981. THAT THIS COUNCIL ADVERTISE AND ENCOURAGE LOCAL INTERESTED CITIZENS TO SUBMIT TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO INTERIM BOARD TO STUDY THE ADVANTAGES OR DISADVANTAGES OF THE CHARTER FORM OF Report to be GOVERNMENT IN APACHE JUNCTION AND TO RENDER THEIR submitted to REPORT NO LATER THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THEIR DATE Council prior to OF APPOINTMENT. C.M. 3/17/82 October 19, 1981 THAT A PARAMEDIC TEAM BE ORGANIZED FOR THE CITY TO BE Not financially ON CALL TWENTY-FOUR HOURS A DAY. (Councilman Eidson) P.S. feasible at this time. THAT MR. FURNESS BE PROVIDED WITH A PLAQUE FROM THE CITY COUNCIL. (Councilman Hudson) C.M. January 5, 1982 THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO FURTHER STUDY THE QUESTION OF ANNEXATION OF THE PROPOSED AIRPORT PROPERTY AND REPORT TO THE COUNCIL THEIR FINDINGS WITHIN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS. (motion carried. ) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: OS SECONDED BY: it1:0 Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON V:// COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH , Vv(/,((/ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE UNAN "1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL -+ti9.l+bets::.�:+c+c.:ar�.wu'4!w�•s - ..:n ... ... .. .....;,.. c.._.., ...... - ,... � .., _. , .. 4r.+^,.'.,..�, .... ,016k Jos* WM.mhi4Cl�iiYf +11:444` tiYn,.•hlt- . .•.::; g N:k••e.'i I 1 ITEM NO . 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P. M . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES (-}/)"(16/Li /41c() ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: Ste' SECONDED BY: YE NO ABSTAINED , COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCIL MAN HUDSON , COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITI- COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICF MAYOR Hit A Cl AYOR RKF _ UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 71) t ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: nr\-111/ SECONDED BY: T �J YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE I UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF O ION BY: P L SECONDED BY: A MOTION YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON v/j: COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH `/ COUNCILPAN DAMIANO COUNCILMANEIDSON D N V VICE MAYOR HILL V/ MAYOR CLARKE UNANI'1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 1 us.. a.v.,.i'w....,.«....,..:.-b-..w..v.:i:.w4iilu..H.•r.,..1e. .t «-.:; .... .... -:..v...t..,ter-...- -. _ �' .. , .. . .- ,.... ... ^Ps.+.<k .Jdr9tP;;tT • 4.:;raP';;rti;4;k'tkittiw 4:iN.�'Xs"k"dNnsw m.mnw;i.',a .«,...:.i9v4/+'«y4q... + "•- �',ltNl+±t -.w.kae'.q��"�'1aK;•:� �4fS+�4on ;S.eetM'�ay�Ca•s(�§!X''a.�+ = .}!�„HV.w`:nHe�fG+'Gr•:ritt•.itsh.Vt.T+... ia."-r4.44..»^;6.4:4ic- ,.•W%u._oteo.k�t+sYika :rere.vt',a „a,yr, .#4,4mpkwe:io4.44 ++w4,4,0;.i :iovowiw?N:t .0.9"avo n e+,4w+wirr 4 -. ter._. -_.. ... .. ..- :a_ ....... .- BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT \/ DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO AMEND SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE REGARDING BUSINESS LICENSES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH A STAGGERED SCHEDULE FOR THE RENEWAL OF BUSINESS LICENSES AND TO ADOPT A MINIMAL OCCUPATIONAL SERVICE CHARGE SCHEDULE FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION PARK AND SWAP , AdIlk LIVEN TO THE COUNCIL 1-19-82 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FINANCIAL REPORT - DECEMBER 1981 DURING THE MONTH OF DECEMBER , THE CITY EXPENDED FROM THE GENERAL FUND $ 179,273.53 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS DEPOSIT $ -0- RECEIVED REVENUES TO THE GENERAL FUND $ 177,712.41 ENCUMBRANCES ON THE GENERAL FUND $ 15,435.00 BANK BALANCE FOR THE GENERAL FUND IS $ 56,378.62 THE GENERAL FUND SAVINGS, DRAWING 54% INTEREST, $ 431. 19 THE COURT BONDS HOLDING CHECKING ACCOUNT INDICATES A BALANCE OF $ 1,726.00 THE HIGHWAY USERS CHECKING EXPENDED $ 24,308.63 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS DEPOSIT $ -0- RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ 13,744.78 ENCUMBRANCES ON HIGHWAY USERS ARE $ 7,611.00 BANK BALANCE FOR HIGHWAY USERS IS $ 27,912.34 THE HIGHWAY USERS SAVINGS, DRAWING 54% INTEREST, $ 560.81 THE PUBLIC WORKS RESERVE FUND DRAWING 54% INTEREST, $ 3,821.08 THE GRANTS IN TRUST CHECKING EXPENDED $ 6,634.97 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS DEPOSIT $ -0- RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ 6,719.92 ENCUMBRANCES ON THE GRANTS IN TRUST ARE $ 110.00 OBLIGATION ON THIS ACCOUNT IS $ 2 ,631 00 BANK BALANCE OF GRANTS IN TRUST ACCOUNT IS $ 25,359.94 THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING CHECKING ACCOUNT EXPENDED $ 5,406.00 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS $ -0- RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ -0- ENCUMBRANCES ON THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING ARE$ 5,285.00 BANK BALANCE FOR FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING IS $ 16,375.71 t r CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FINANCIAL REPORT - DECEMBER 1981 THE PAYROLL ACCOUNT EXPENDED $ 84,836.98 TRANSFERRED FROM GENERAL FUND - HIGHWAY USERS AND CETA TO PAYROLL ACCOUNT $ 35,036.98 BANK BALANCE OF PAYROLL ACCOUNT IS $ 37,355.36 THE CITY'S -CERTIFICATE nF DEPOSIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 250,000 00 IS NOW WITH FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS DRAWING 13.5 % INTEREST. THIS CERTIFICATE WILL MATURE ON JANUARY 28, 1932 IT SHOULD EARN INTEREST OF APPROXIMATELY $ 2,800.00 FOR THE THIRTY DAY PERIOD. MAKING UP THI`_, CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT GENERAL FUNDS $ 40,000.00 HIGHWAY USERS $ 10,000.00 GRANTS IN TRUST $ 95,000.00 FEDERAL REVENUE SH. $ 105,000.00 AN ADDITIONAL $ 50,000.00 IS NOW IN A HOLDING SAVINGS ACCOUNT AT FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND WILL BE PLACED IN THE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT ON JANUARY 28, 1982. SUBMITTED BY: ROSEMARY MONTGOMERY ACTING DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ROLL CALL I "4° ROLL CALL I PRESENT I ABSENT MAYOR aARKE ✓ I ` . VICE—MAYOR DILL A ►� COUNCILMAN EIDSON A V / COUNCILMAN HUDSON ,✓I ✓ : COUNCILMAN SfMKS COUNCILMAN SIE.LLSr1ITH ! V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO Ni! ✓ TOTAL � V STAFF PRESENT CITY MANAGER Bill McDaniel V CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly ✓ DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES , / `� DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Joe Gero v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel • v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman +/ CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexande /Mr. Hirs OTHER