Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 02.02 City Council Regular Agenda QACHF li 4/,'.4ili114c1A� P'` , ✓Gti t.-:,;A k it ;',,,,' -6 d9R1z014P. Wily cue 4ac/ze 2unctian CITY COUNCIL ... REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FEBRUARY 2, 1982 7:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. WORK SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 1982 (3) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1982 AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC ..... CITY MANAGER'S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (4) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-01, GENERAL PLAN (5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 94, PALM SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (First Reading) (6) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 127, APACHE ONE PARTNERSHIP (First Reading) (7) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 128, APACHE TWO LIMITED (First Reading) (8) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 134, PARK AND SWAP VENDOR SPACES FEE (First Reading With Emergency Clause) OLD BUSINESS (9) APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 NEW BUSINESS None. (10) WORK SESSION, FEBRUARY 16, 1982 (11) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (12) ADJOURNMENT THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR. TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR CONNUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES AA 4, - Dv' ) 1 ITEM # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: / SECONDED BY: r YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCIL MAN FIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSOJ COUNCILMAN SHANKS V/ COUNCILMAN STFELSMIT v COUNCILMAN DAMIANO I VICF MAYOR HILL _ MAYOR CI ARKF v UNAN I""OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA, BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 21, 1982 ra itos. ''$C„ "+dd�`....:.•%fir_.<._14 ti The special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache PIN. Junction, Arizona, was held on January 21, 1982, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law __ ... CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7.00 p m. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Eidson, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Hudson, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke Staff Present• Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel Acting City Clerk/Deputy City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly City Attorney, David Alexander GENERAL PLAN Mayor Clarke stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission voted on the proposed General Plan, with the result of four in favor and two opposed Mayor Clarke charged all members of Boards and Commissions to conduct themselves in a business-like and professional manner. City Attorney, David Alexander, informed the Council of the requirements for the General Plan (1) There must be a circulation (map) showing where the streets are and '1.1\ where the proposed streets are located. (2) A land use element• what the distribution of housing will be, industry, agriculture, public buildings, public grounds, the - population in certain areas This should be a map which will be used as a standard for subsequent zoning ordinances and subdivision ordinances. If a zoning ordinance does not follow the General Plan, it is in violation of the General Plan, and the first step would be to amend the General Plan Mr Alexander stated that the City of Apache Junction has never been required to sign a subdivision plan One is now necessary. Mr. Alexander stated that the State law requires the City to have a subdivision regulation and suggested that a temporary subdivision ordinance be drawn up until the adoption of a General Plan Mayor Clarke MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO DRAW UP A TEMPORARY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE UNTIL ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried Mr Alexander stated that there is a section in the proposed General Plan regarding the abandonment of Highway 88. Councilman Hudson stated that it is his opinion that Highway 88 should not be abandoned. Mr. Alexander informed the Council that citizens are being told that Highway 88 will be abandoned, and their access being changed. Councilman Steelsmith stated that possibly there was another solution to the problem, instead of abandoning Highway 88 Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel, stated that people had been �1 requesting approval for development along Highway 88 and they have been told that Highway 88 may be abandoned. Mr McDaniel informed the Department of Public Works that this will be controversial and should defer mentioning the possibility to citizens Mr McDaniel stated that anyone wishing to develop in the area of Highway 88 should be able to continue with the present guidelines and requirements. Mr. Alexander stated that he had spoken with Mr. Dave Naugle regarding the Palm Springs Water Company rates and was advised by Mr Naugle that if a rehearing is requested and granted, there is a big chance that the water rates will be increased, as the chance is that they will be lowered Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel , stated that a copy of a conversation with Mr Naugle and a letter from him was provided to Mr. Richard Taylor The cost to obtain a rehearing would be extensive and citizens may object to City funds being used for one group of people Councilman Hudson stated that the City Attorney could be working on this one matter for possibly six months. Councilman Damiano stated that the Council has to do something regarding this matter Vice Mayor Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING DEPARTMENTS TO INFORM THEM TO NOT ADVISE PEOPLE ON CLOSING OF HIGHWAY 88 AND NOT LET IT MAR REZONINGS. Councilman Hudson seconded the motion. ,0111N, VOTE Unanimous .. The motion carried Mayor Clarke adjourned the meeting at 8 50 p m APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY ::.. Acting City Clerk SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 21, 1982 PAGE TWO ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES r/i)-19) I 1/ ITEM # MEETING OF kMOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH v COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS V VICE MAYOR HILL V MAYOR CLARKE I UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 1982, BE AND HEREBY ARE, ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . eiN oak CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 19, 1982 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on January 19, 1982, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7 05 p m INVOCATION Councilman Eidson led the Invocation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Mayor Hill led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Eidson, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Hudson, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Hill , Mayor Clarke Staff Present: Acting City Manager/Director of Public Safety, Bill McDaniel Acting City Clerk/Deputy City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly Director of Planning, Joe Gero Director of Public Works, Rich Broman 'oak City Attorney, Arnold Hirsch Others Present Ms Fran Heidi 1345 South Cactus Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Ms Betty Thompson 310 North Ocotillo Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. John O'Mara 251 West 16th Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr Richard Rabidue 575 West 23rd Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA Vice Mayor Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, WITH ITEM NO 10, WAIVED. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. --h - �� y� - �- =-• VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Ant. �► ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF DECEMBER 29, 1981 ) ) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF DECEMBER 29, 1981, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried • ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 12, 1982 ) Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF JANUARY 12, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR . MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1982 Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Clarke stated that in the past the City Council has had a policy of presenting a Certificate of Appreciation to a deserving citizen, but would like to have suggestions for recipients deserving recognition from the public CALL TO THE PUBLIC Ms Fran Heidi, 1345 North Ocotillo, Apache Junction, Arizona, addressed the Council regarding the cleanup of washes because of debris caused by rains Ms Heidi also expressed the opinion that the City should have their own trash pick-up Mayor Clarke stated that most of the washes needing attention are on private property, but that the wash indicated is "Weekes Wash", east of Cactus Road, which does need cleaning and will be investigated Mayor Clarke stated that the trash pick-up companies are privately owned and operated, but that City-owned sanitation companies may be considered Mr. Richard Taylor stated that he was going to speak, but Mr O'Mara would cover the subject REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE TWO /IN Mr John O'Mara, Vice President of the Apache Junction Homeowner's Association, 251 West 16th Avenue, Apache Junction, addressed the Council regarding the Palm Springs Water Company issue, stating that the Corporation Commission had rejected Resolution No 81-14 as it was too vague. Mr. O'Mara requested that the Council pass a more specific resolution, as the Corporation Commission won't work with the Homeowner's Association without the City Council endorsement Mayor Clarke reiterated that the City Council would look into the matter and do their best to work with the Homeowner's Association and the Corporation Commission to resolve the issue CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel, reported that the City has mailed out 520 Business License statements. As of this date, 182 have responded with payment, with a total amount of $8,351 00. Director of Public Works, Rich Broman, reported on the progress toward creating a street light improvement district in Apache Villa, stating that the Salt River Project has been contacted, and is beginning to design a system updating the district area and to determine the cost. Mr. Broman stated that his is an involved project and in the past the necessary agreements were not available To obtain these was very time consuming He also outlined the requirements necessary for this project :•; Mr. Broman reported on the speed test requested by the City Council The motion passed by the Council was sent to the Arizona Department of Transportation in Globe, but will be performed by the Department of Transportation in Phoenix Mr Broman informed the Council that the dirt road treatment preferred by the Council has been started. Mayor Clarke asked if there were any citizens present whom had signed the petition for the street light improvement district As no one who had signed the petition was present, Mr Broman ern\ stated that he would contact those citizens and inform them of the progress regarding the issue Councilman Hudson requested that Mr. Broman explain to the public how this district is financed. Mr Broman informed the public that when the district is created, the lights and electrical fees would be charged to the property owners. Each property owner is assessed once a year and charged a flat assessment fee. PUBLIC HEARINGS APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PARK Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Ms Betty Thompson, Manager of the Desert Queen Trailer Park, expressed her wish that the application be recommended for approval Councilman Damiano stated that in the REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE THREE field inspection it had been revealed that there is little additional parking in the trailer park. Ms Thompson stated that the license would be used by the trailer park only, so there would not be a need for additional parking Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application There being no one wishing to address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed �� the hearing to the public • Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY THE DESERT QUEEN TRAILER PARK, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried OLD BUSINESS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 120, r ,' .1.• _ ; ; .; TANDY Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO 120, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 120, by title only for the second reading. ign Acting City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, .. read as follows. ORDINANCE NO 120, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 120, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-20-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANS, LETTERS STIPULATION AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT THE PLANNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE FOUR DEVELOPMENT AS APPROVED MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE GENERAL CRITERIA AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 33 09 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE (1) THE CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZES THE SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE LAND USE COMMITTEE HAVE MADE IN DEVELOPING INFORMATION FROM WHICH THEY HAVE CONCLUDED A AmokPROPOSED GENERAL PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY. HOWEVER, IN THIS CASE, THE APPLICATION FOR THE TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD), HAS REQUIRED ADVANCE SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT BY THE APPLICANT WHO, IN GOOD FAITH, PREPARED A COMPLETE APPLICATION WHICH WAS PRESENTED TO THE CITY FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION PRIOR TO THERE BEING COMPLETE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE WHICH ULTIMATELY WAS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE LAND USE COMMITTEE THE DAY PRIOR TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF THIS APPLICATION IT APPEARS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT IT WOULD BE UNFAIR TO PLACE UPON THIS APPLICANT THE NECESSITY TO CHANGE HIS PLANS WHEN INFORMATION HAD NOT BEEN AVAILABLE (2) THE CITY COUNCIL TAKES NOTE THAT THE APPLICATION PROPOSED, WITH THE LOCAL STREETS NOW ABANDONED, WOULD HAVE MINIMUM LOT SIZES APPROXIMATELY 14,000 SQUARE FEET WHICH IS SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER THAN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE AS REQUIRED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND WHICH, IS LARGER THAN THE MINIMUM 10,000 SQUARE FEET WHICH WOULD BE THE MINIMUM SIZE OF LOTS PROPOSED IN MOST OF THE COMMUNITY BY THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN. (3) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES HAVE FRONTAGE AND, THEREFORE, ACCESS ON IRONWOOD DRIVE WHICH WOULD GIVE ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR THE MOVEMENT OF MOBILE UNITS IN THE AREA AND SHOULD BE ABLE TO HANDLE ANY TRAFFIC WHICH MAY BE GENERATED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 121, PECK (Second Reading) Mayor Clarke stated that the Council had received a letter from the applicant, wishing to withdraw the .^. application. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT REZONING CASE PZ-21-81 ALSO KNOWN AS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 121, APPLICATION OF VINTON PECK, BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Councilman Damiano seconded the �.. ,.. .... .� -.....w.�s motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 125, YODER (Second Reading) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 125, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE FIVE "ask VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 125, by title only for the second reading Acting City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 125, AN ORDINANCE OF THE 0.111k, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, • ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERAL RURAL (GR); REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 125, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERAL RURAL (GR), REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED; FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: - A. "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. 1. Councilman Damiano wished to make it clear that the reason for his recommendation is that the majority of residents in the area were in favor of this rezoning case. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting at 7:56 p.m. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT APPLICATION Superintendent of Community Services, .,� - �,- •a _„� ,.,..�. Mr. Jeff Bell , explained that the land acquisition of 276 acres is for a recreational park Mr Bell outlined the Park Development Plan, a - copy of which was provided to the Council, prepared by Willdan Associates Mr Bell stated that there is a fault in the plan in the form of an overestimation of the funding available for this project As a result, a supplemental plan was also provided to the Council , which meets the criteria of Bureau of Land Management Mr Bell informed the Council that it is the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission that the application and proposed map be approved. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND UNDER THE RECREATION AND PUBLIC PURPOSE ACT BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL _ JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE SIX BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE THE DESCRIBED BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF A CITY PARK. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion Councilman Hudson asked what the name ' --°'= of the camping park would be Director of Planning stated that a vote was taken at the Planning and Zoning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, and the camping park would be designated as "Equine Camping", for rodeo purposes only, when a rodeo is in progress. Councilman Hudson wished to know if only rodeo participants, with stock, would be able to use the camping area Mr Gero stated that the camping park would be designed to standards for camping with stock, but would not necessarily designate who would be allowed to camp in the park. Councilman Steelsmith stated that in the future there it will be necessary to have regulations for the camping areas. Councilman Damiano asked if when there was a rodeo on the rodeo grounds, the camping area would be strictly for �w -may rodeo participants. Mr Gero explained that it would be best for safety reasons to restrict the camping area for rodeo participants while there is a rodeo, but rodeos are not frequent or year round, so there should not be a problem. [ VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. NEW BUSINESS ACCEPTANCE OF LIBRARY BOARD MEMBER RESIGNATION Mayor Clarke stated that Ms Elizabeth Burks requested that the Council accept her resignation from the Library Board due to personal reasons Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CTIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, - + ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MS ELIZABETH BURKS FROM THE LIBRARY BOARD, BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED WITH REGRET Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried WORK SESSION, FEBRUARY 2, 1982 Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON FEBRUARY 2, 1982, AT 6 00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE SEVEN .M. .. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) • Councilman Shanks reported on the Emergency Food Providers meeting The next meeting will be January 22, 1982, at 9 00 a m in the Community Services Building. Councilman Steelsmith informed the Council and public that the 0016., Planning and Zoning Commission meeting will be held on January 20, 1982, at 7 00 p m Councilman Hudson reported on the Charter Government meeting Councilman Damiano called on Mr. Richard Rabidue to brief the Council on the "Gong Show" being held for the Veterans Memorial Park. Mr. Rabidue stated that a time and date is not yet set for the show, and the show will be as close as possible to the original Gong Show There will be booths and Memorial Bricks sold, and also a ground breaking scheduled for February 15, 1982 Councilman Hudson asked how the sale of the Memorial Bricks is proceeding Mr. Rabidue stated that it is going well Mayor Clarke informed the Council that he has spoken with two different contractors who have donated their time to pour concrete and lay blocks. [ Councilman Eidson announced the resignation of Ms Sandra Oberg from the Board of Adjustment, which creates two vacancies on the Board of Adjustment Councilman Eidson requested that these vacancies be publicized. Councilman Shanks stated that the problem with handicapped parking is continuing, requesting that signs be put up in front of handicapped parking spaces. Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel , stated that the staff is in the process of drafting an ordinance regarding handicapped parking, so that this can be enforced. Mayor Clarke informed the Council that there is a nationwide standard sign for this use, and it is being investigated Councilman Hudson agreed that handicapped parking spaces are hard to see at night, and the majority of people don't park in them intentionally. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Councilman Eidson addressed the Council regarding the study several Councilmembers conducted on changes in the Business License and Park N' Swap Ordinances. Councilman Eidson requested that this be publicized so as to obtain input from the public, and recommended that the Ordinance remain the same with the exception that the licenses be valid for a staggered yearly term, and that a 35 fee be charged for parking spaces at the Park N' Swap. Councilman Hudson stated that the Acting City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, had spoken with the Manager of the Park N' Swap, who has no opposition to the charge REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE EIGHT Vice Mayor Hill affirmed that the Park N' Swap Manager agrees with the parking charge Councilman Eidson stated that the parking charge had been compared with the Park N' Swap in Tucson, which was the same fee and will remain so for some time Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO AMEND SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE REGARDING BUSINESS LICENSES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH A STAGGERED SCHEDULE FOR THE RENEWAL OF BUSINESS LICENSES AND TO ADOPT A MINIMAL OCCUPATIONAL SERVICE CHARGE SCHEDULE FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION PARK AND SWAP, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Councilman Hudson stated that during the past several months, the City Manager applications had been screened and applicants interviewed Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT MR JAMES TUVELL BE HIRED AS CITY MANAGER AT A STARTING ! SALARY OF $35,500.00 PER YEAR IN TWENTY-SIX (26) EQUAL INSTALLMENTS HPwiYna " - Y AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 12, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1, 1982 Councilman Steelsmith seconded the ( motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called on Mr James Tuvell , to welcome Mr Tuvell to the City of Apache Junction. Mr. Tuvell stated that it is a great honor to be asked to serve as City Manager, in what he considered to be his home town. -4064. Mayor Clarke congratulated the City Manager Screening Committee on the work they did. Councilman Eidson congratulated Acting City Manager, Bill McDaniel on a job well done Mayor Clarke requested that the City Clerk investigate the song about Apache Junction that Jay Mitchell wrote as the City's official song Mayor Clarke MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO CONTACT MR JAY MITCHELL REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF HIS SONG AS THE OFFICIAL CITY SONG Councilman Damiano seconded the motion Councilman Shanks agreed that Mr. Mitchell 's song was very well done and appropriate for Apache Junction. Councilman Steelsmith requested that Mr Mitchell be asked to come to a Council Meeting and sing the song for the Council. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 -- -- PAGE NINE it Councilman Hudson stated that Mr. Mitchell sings several songs regarding the Superstition Mountains and does an outstanding performance VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:25 P.M. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion . VOTE Unanimous The motion carried APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. WENDELL J. CLARKE "d.`::,, K:`.:• Mayor ATTEST. KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk _.r...:_-•..-- ._.___.___. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 1982 PAGE TEN ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES -on... P -4,P)'/-2/1 ' 111-Cji 9/' 116 , ' ov ITEMII ..„ MEETING OF MOTION BY: C (11SECONDED BY: 11) YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS v COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V VICE MAYOR HILL \d/./ MAYOR CLARKE ,/ UNANIM US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Aloft •se�4 "S%a7.w�+f+t.�i,.r?af:w# '�+�ec�+ea��':,-%:.r. . .. .. ., .. . ..w:><. _... /� ✓.!@'Yi.l1[+.wAVi4�}..1.....✓.{'N.4A: .Mr6: ♦..i. .. ...'-�lru .. .i ... ..t.K+.r,.. .... ..tYL4 .. ,.. __`. ITEM NO . _3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 1982, BE AND HEREBY ARE, ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. PUBLIC HEARING C 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-01, GENERAL PLAN 2, IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME, 3, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, PQACHF aGst ti amity o c94pache 09unction January 25, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER /JVA . FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ,j,1.2).'S BY JOE GERO, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - GENERAL PLAN FEBRUARY 2, 1982 Background At the September 12, 1979, City Council meeting, the staff was instructed to begin pursuing certain studies and to seek Four Corners Regional Commission (FCRC) funding. In discussion with the FCRC staff, it was suggested a grant to prepare a general plan be sought. The FCRC grant was subsequently approved. Studies covering the following areas were prepared by consultant services: .► *Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona *Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona *Transportation Plan for Apache Junction, Arizona *Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona In addition, a separate contract was approved to prepare a City Complex plan. Numerous public meetingswere conducted by the Land Use Plan Com- mittee. On November 9, 1981 , the Land Use Plan Committee presented its proposal at a public presentation. On November 19, 1981 , copies of the draft were sent to the following agencies in compliance with the mandatory sixty-day review period of ARS 5 461 .05(F) : Approver for Agenda —................... Date It.m # First Re .r.g .."ijf? . 4.. Second Re;,,,ing _ __. !^Public Hearing 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602j Y82-8tid 's f Business REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - GENERAL PLAN (February 2, 1982) January 25, 1982 Page Two Maricopa Association of Governments Central Arizona Association of Governments Maricopa County Planning Commission Pinal County Planning Commission City of Mesa State Land Department Phoenix District Office, Bureau of Land Management Maricopa County Flood Control District Office of Economic Planning and Development The sixty-day review period was reached on January 18, 1982. Copies of the proposal are on file in the city library, City Clerk' s office, Chamber of Commerce, and Planning Department for public review. As requested, copies have been made available to the public. The staff has conducted numerous public meetings, including meeting with spe- cial interest groups to answer inquiries and to present an overview of the proposal . On December 28, 1981 , the public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was advertised and on Janaury 20, 1982, the Com- mission held its public hearing and concluded its recommendation. On January 17, 1982, a public hearing before the City Council was advertised subject to the Council receiving a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Written Comments The following persons or agencies have submitted letters to the city of Apache Junction regarding the draft proposed general plan: (Copies .-. attached. ) A. Arizona State Land Department - Joe T. Fallini , State Land Commissioner B. The Honorable James Karam, Jr. - Pinal County District 2 Supervisor C. Central Arizona Association of Governments - Phillip E. Goldsberry, Regional Planning Director D. Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission - Phil Hogue, Chairman E. Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce - Jan Hiller, President F. William A. Beaulieu G. Flood Control District of Maricopa County - William Mathews, P.C. , Chief Engineer and General Manager H. City of Mesa, Planning and Community Development - Wayne Balmer Assistant Planning Director REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - GENERAL PLAN (February 2, 1982) January 25, 1982 Page Three I. Maricopa County Department of Planning and Development - Don McDaniel , Director, by Dudley Onderdonk, Principal Planner Advance Planning Division J. Arizona Department of Transportation - Art Averback, Chief Regional Planner, by Ronn Edwards, Regional Planner K. Bureau of Land Management, Phoenix District Office - Robert Archibald, Jr. , Area Manager, Phoenix Resource Area L. Clara Carney by Clay Worst (Power of Attorney submitted) M. Certain citizens of Pinal County by Jim Swanson Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation At the January 20, 1982, special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the following motion was passed (4-2; M/S Baljo/Hall ) . (See attached motion with attachments. ) City Council Consideration Resolution 82-1 has been drafted for the purpose of seeking consideration for adoption of a city general plan. Adoption of the resolution would accomplish the following: 1 . Adopt that certain document "Apache Junction 2001 . Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan" as the city general plan and by implication recommend to Pinal County officials and others their consideration of the study area outside the city limits. 2. Adopt those certain documents "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona" as part of the general plan. Previously, the City Council has adopted the "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. " In order to make application for the city hall site from the state land department, the city must adopt and present its development plan. 3. Accepts the reports "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," and "Transportation Plan for Apache Junction, Arizona" for reference only. 4. Directs the Planning and Zoning Commission to annually inspect the general plan and present to the City Council a status report and recommendations. On any of the above reports prior to consideration of the resolution, the City Council may adopt certain amendments. Consideration of the resolution would then include the documents as amended. Al REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - GENERAL PLAN (February 2, 1982) January 25, 1982 Page Four Suggested Motion "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, that Resolution 82-1 , a resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, adopting the Apache Junction, Arizona, general plan • entitled "Apache Junction: 2001 , Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," which includes, but is not limited to, a land use element, sewage disposal alternatives, water systems analysis, a circulation (transportation) plan, and a Section 16 master plan; and accepts as reference the reports "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona;" and adopts as part of the general plan the documents entitled "Popula- tion Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona," be and hereby is adopted. " "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that it recommends for approval (-to .the City Counc t) the general plan of Apache Junction, entitled "Apache Junction 2001," as laid forth in Resolution No. 82-1 that you have before you, and it be amended to include the amendments that have been brought forth by the staff 1. The Land Uee Map be changed as pen attachment Noe 1,2, and 3 (No. 1 - Commenciae.) (N0 2 - Section 1) (No 3 - Section 16) 2. The Land Uee Map be changed to neblect the exc6.tcng (CR-5) high dens-cty zoncng ae pen attached map (at Ctay wanst'e Aeguezt). (See Attachment No 4 ) 3. Page 2-50 undeA "Gu,cdeeenes On map changes ate," add at the end _ ob No 2 the boltow.ing "Fox that anew along U.S. Highway 60 east ob Idaho Road, the outer boundary ob the commexccal oppontun,cty area may be con- b.c.dened -to include pant to all o6 any tot which AA panteatty ox totally within .the .two-hundred-boot-wide boundary. However, each xezontng appt ceatcon ehoutd be by planned development and each case ehauld be acted upon based on the menct ob the xe- 4uet (See Attachment No 14 ) 4 Page 2-45 toward the top o6 .the page at .the concluwtian o6 the commercial dcscuse.ion, add .the 6ottoweng new paragraph- "Comme-kceoi use! on .the Land U4e Map, Fcgure No L-7 -cnctude the 6oUoweng COMMERCIAL AREAS DEPICTED ON APACHE JUNCTION 2001 LAND USE MAP KEY COMMERCIAL Key Commereeal - 172 acne.- Key "Opportunity Anew" - 38 aetes GENERAL COMMERCIAL OIN Genenat Commene,cat - 312 acres Generale "Oppontuncty Mean - 370 acne!, LOCAL COMMERCIAL Local Commenceal. - 41 acres Locale "Oppontuncty Anew" - 212 acne-, REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL 629 aches TOTAL = 1,774 aches 5 77% ob total Land in etudy area 25 acres o6 "commercial" per 1,000 popuL.ccteon ((Dazed on 2001 population pxojectcon) PRESENT COMMERCIAL USES 197 acres 0.6% 06 total Land in etudy anew 6.5 ac Aes 496 commetc-tal uses pen 1,000 peJw0ne (based on 1980 poputa.teon est•cmate) 5. Page 1-9, F.cgune No G-4 make m.cnot changes pet Bateau o6 Land Management letter and map (Attachment No 5) 7 • and also include the request for amendment that was presented by Mr Worst (See Attachment No. 6.) As far as amendments are concerned, there are some further amending/recom- mendations that I would like to make as part of my motion - that consideration T:. be given to make the following changes 1. Prior to adoption of this plan by the Council, in view of the assumptions stated in Paragraph One above, with reference to the horsemen's desires on lands that lie within the corporate limits, that they be dealt with on a case-by-case basis as reclassification is requested, adequate protection for land '� ""` owners is already provided by the Planning and Zoning Ordinance, I reiterate, WITHIN the corporate limits 2. That the low density areas within the corporate limits be desig- nated "medium density area." 3. That freeway off-ramps stay as planned by the state at Tomahawk and Ironwood Roads and at a later date an off-ramp be considered at Idaho Road Specifics. To support the analysis and recommendations stated, I did not state the analysis,the copies of which are before the Commission.(See Attachment No 7 ) The following minimum changes are requested Page 2-40 (2-50?) Guidelines for a map change in Paragraph One Change "higher than low density residential" to "a higher than medium density residential." (See Attachment No 8 ) Page 2-43 under "Assumption," change "2 33" to "8," "3.72" to "8." (See Attachment No 9 ) Page 2-43 under "Event," change "2 33 persons per acre" to "8 persons per acre." Change "low density" to "medium density " Land Use Map Figure No L-7, Area I should not include any areas within the existing city bourdaries Low density should not be depicted within existing city boundaries south to the north boundary of the Superstition Freeway with the exception of Section 16. These areas should be designated "medium density." Same page, under "depict," "Local commercial opportunity areas" at intersection of Delaware and Superstition Boulevard (See Attachment No 10.) en1 Page 5-8, Paragraph 12, change "two ramps" to "three ramps," delete the words "eliminating the proposed ramps " (See Attachment No 11 ) Page 5-10, Paragraph 9, delete "3) Having freeway ramps " (See Attachment No 12.) Page 6-4, Residential Uses, change "3 72" to "8-20 persons per acre." Change "1 6" to "6 dwelling units per acre." "Recommendations," at the bottom of the page, add "medium density for the remainder of the city " (See Attachment No 13 ) These are the specifics I mention in my motion I have several copies which I can distribute here There may be several amendments in there that I didn't specifically note as far as the ones that were presented by the staff, but I would let the record reflect that their recommendations that were not in con- flict with the changes that I just mentioned be also incorporated into the general plan * That is the end of my motion " "Stash comments age typed .en "bcicc,pt." Mr Bal,7o's comments are typed in "letter gothic " / •••••• •• • - F I I T�1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 ��\\ll _•Miii • �N •V�rriirriii �•iiri • • • ■ / : . • : : . ' •••• • a • I' m1 O II( rib, - •N... aN •••••rr•••� •r•r- \, - ,ill:, ",. • ••■ I .. .. . . . . 7/1{ \ M ��i}_ ►•r'i•rrr••rrri �i i i i • • '. ' .. �.�. I I 1 i , ,I 2� 1 tf 111•r•• ••Crr�irr•••i� ••••r1111M.. YIJ•It•m , . �• i siris- • •• •• : :�T {hfl }'II:I T 2 (4 I \� M•Aj1 ii••iii�irrrr::::;fiii f17 • �t \ ^ �• ' t1`� •. ._._1•!•I,l.rlill-, l1�f 1 1I C�\•11Y•�Mr ••••••••r••••• ••••rarW M• \.. I 1U t- i••r•ii i••r • •rr•••i .w w. 4•• \ �• I Nu•�•jN11MI�IIw rM ••r••••••r••r 1•}s•'•••••�� Fy w� �I«.w�\ ;I I\ • ■ / • .. C• : : I I I'1 I'IiY•IMII YtOIMa •••••1•.•.•.•,!� •••• l:.��• 1111111111 r. ;. Prrrrrrrrr••• r` �. `-::'ynuMlN h •h��+_ !x•r••••••'•...•• rrrrr „! D. • ■ • • • •• •• • _-� • e ' '! •�\\\+\f} \ 1/2•lR Pur \ii••i••••••°ri•r::•. :•:•:: ''�T».ir••iiww'•' I \\ •• • • \ it • 1111iiG�lIMN7•i•• t , rf •'�.j\\ �. a •�\. '•e •W`•W W• • /. . .. rrr rrTiLli•. ,•..tqwwire t1��111llllll •llrlllQUBfu `tag \.I w \ t «•fr.•• . - . . . •• all II ww '.L ••wry( •Y••••••YM1••••• i•04 141 it!•.!{ •= `% �' I(1i' ` tl•1•S I L I 1 III( 1 I1 1 I I I ►+�•. _L•�ii i•W'w�t a�.r•wrwuwtoJ: I •� \• +• Y r •-• • • r _ — I • 2 u• •1RJt� MII•aY •M '!J rrtY I ." •�rr �•• • • ■ •• _ __ IIY► YIIiMI=•0�INriW1%or:i ••• , `•••• - Tr I I'1 ' li ���y� Y 11111,11.1141111111411141111111.,1••j•!• ` LIU�Ml1•RY1YWr 1 •• • • ♦ ! A ♦*P•♦• _' • I I/41 11 • • .t6• 814.• .1• Y1/1���t�•'•%;`\ /1I. .•_ \ . .x..•;\\�.�•� M` �• •,D.1 71r1i1� '. _IIl� I I. — 1..7:: •,..,,,„ ` r: . \\ ! . .r \\ f••`• ........ •.'�•...j. •. •• .... . . ,• -'II{I lilt- `'.. '•. i•!�•yy ..L�\\ • __ri T11'_•1 s'• • • - ` • • ••• .. 11 I I It( I H+ y Q^ ... 1 •. i �I I.. • uw �• ••! • • --,. e • 4.Q.:•:�• � �... i F .. . t4. ,' �•••• Via_ 1 !t i• Ti� ••• • • ........„..,....•:. . ••:r•:� • •• ... .. \ ` \ .w ' 4... .•rri r • .: • • •• • ,. . •••'•-• 1 '�•••• • •• . •• • •• .. �•_--_i�__ ien• wrrrA'rr,� M.•rrr• 1- --111MMtl••\ •.• ••Y . .. w 1• •�(�y�W ir'•,1L',- 1 11.4..., wr••rr•i•••i••ii� ir•iir•••• • •.•••••••••• • IIr(•�In.�� I j I z- !••ii••iiiiiii• .rr.%iiii:��♦♦.A♦♦♦♦••'••••1 •• • •... •••• r .•.• •t • •r • •► •.•• • . i Ntrte .T.r.tw.�:_ `►••••••• •!•.R rid•••••••ii••••♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ - -.,.\ y • • F• 1 ••....•• • •"•• r} r r :' ••••• •rr ••••••••••••••••••• ft ' . ♦♦r♦♦♦♦♦ • •�••�`I •:'••:•A••'.•••..� • ��'�' IIIIi,llil' XI . • '.•i �. :M !•••.. •. 1iJ;r,!i:.`• •�•• ••7i , • • •-• ••••�••::•: •• •••.• �tt1� --.i rrI �� \ \ ♦ '1/4\�i•r••••••i• ii•(j�•�;�i'.riiiiiiiiii!i�x"rt \• • •••-• ••1 • ••• •• • ••• •► . ••rrwua,-�11. . •r•r••••• r•••r• ••.•• •••r•••••••••••••• i ••r••••••: ,••••,••r•••••••••••" \\ • • / •• ••••+••• ••• .. -,. , ���•,�,•� •riii:��• •••••• r::: 1 i�iit iii:ii rrrri• • •♦♦♦ i�.••�+••i•••••.•••N .,1.,..1••..r♦ r�MFiTA.. j \ \\\\: •••••••. ••••r••r.'..✓.!!i'S!•• • • ♦ • . ••. •• . •• • •• • 1 : •:::•rri • it • •:• • • • • ••• 4.• 1- ..r•:•% •'-.:iirrrrr••i!i'•i., •iriiiiiii:iii►r\ ••/;*♦•�► ♦ark•, • l ••'' _ • , .4y .. .,t,..•.:��..,• : .44•. ♦•mow . . r y 1'I ., r + a�• ►• 11 • • • 1 - • —��:L• •n`{+1 Sass .•. -{•I i tTNI •I• 1. ti• ••.•••• -••♦♦•►♦41 ,•4r..•. ,\ \ •. i3•;: ■:%••■ 2 • ' r�----i� {:Z:' j • I ••1 • 171,}L' ra❖- -4.0' 4+ •• • .• I -{ • • ••. • • • • 1 N '-'1.. 4 P t' 't:• =L F.It.i X P � '•• 1 ::! as.►♦ +i♦ -,r--_•:I r. • '.•. • �•`•`•`• :, :;. �r F` }k 15��I 1rr�I� vylf k I -'.s ♦��►• ;� � 7_ Ci I __ '• r••;•••• ', .4-L t• ..Nit y 1 Z -tl�l'I I1 1 t -.I-4 11:•I # ♦♦�. ♦•-• , ..._;t T _�• ^\Ij�• . ' • :• ::. • • • ■ .� 1 11r� 1' ' 'll"11 I rl1 I II{ x7,, -, ^�• ♦• 1.1.« r \•► miss,. (A ._�It . 1 1tF'i1i 111 111�N 1�i�� 1 L II I t /n� ♦'1/ • .: • 1 �I... Wit. .. >•• • • •• IIs11rr i I Ii� E h I 1144 f'f 1 I f 4: ♦1a I F Y�. rl p1.+ -t •••••,• , ▪ Windom '+t4-+ t�, ►�{ s tAm .•�•.• \\\ __ •�: u :k ow,• • :••• ••••'• ql 1 1 I I I 1 I I " �` `• .�•.r-t •...• A\\\ • ... _ •i • I L1 ►_1..i L -I I.I.LLI�Lt CI I !!a.�dli,♦ •T - ••• • . . • t,♦♦♦♦ ili. .•� Q. C'yy'hh{ I d .1 '•. • r �♦� • ♦... ♦♦.1Ii;� ... p11sa. A.A.�♦♦ is_si t•• ;♦ P♦♦� •..: 1 �!n� : • r►�, 4 i ~♦11(* .W /M q �•/r.''?4,1.; ♦�•. r• .. ♦♦•�•4 ♦♦♦♦I .. • �Ii M..:'1 r-.�,a. •I ♦1�♦t �••�y�.�.(e—�� e���Win�••}. r•�•-/}t•1►�_w�•• J .. �� • !!,�jt� '�♦'•• "-"""'" .. art '•I. .:�:��l.:k :�:�rd�UM!:B��000 !_FeE• - ...,. ...' --- ... • t r;• �:;;;•:•••! ,•_ •1 •; e:Er1 DflE�■OMDODolel t .. __• _•T• „:- ♦,.•2 -_-•• ••_ II �i] BE oaE�E�im. �4 L•%; _ E 1` E rr • .. .1 • * ♦•• • ; :� �MI.a DE el :: � El 1 •::•:• • '• ♦• ` 717 ItjJ � �DE'r! • Im�UWlZt tsi-.l • •I��• _ t -< wi Y2_](] L Cl CIE s�' f1 • •�m� oi,. s wN�e!1 d ]DEn�� acmk olt ip 3 siii ii ee ai T.,,,4_,E�ET'uEC� E�mQ[� l(]�DflmD UU �.:t: •OEEli�3E_l 'MOMMOMEri�LJtiDDIMB"I Ur r'r1::•:o • ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ . .. �� 1 l!. �����C .'' _�_:��.,i:3r�.lCJE�IGE 9 C]D(DO DO • { -♦♦•►•♦ ♦ ,. • G . . liallrnrr rriii r,r----i-- 1 ri-I ‘‘,1t0 r_ - ., ` • _ ti,\ U SA {I i l J�_J R 1I U.S.A. IIOtT DUTCHMAN 171"1-1 i 2 _ STATIC PARK 1? c,6 17-1F-7--If 1 i r- •,r,', . f —Hviik I./ (A, ...,— . cikt.t• cc). • -ILEf I 0.-% �L JLL� L 1� ' .1 _ 1 1▪_• ,l_ ,f- iL_I_ _ ,. - t , _. ,I,- 1 1 INS KELLIPS BLVD I 11 f _ _ , II II 1. -► JI,.J Lid II I ILL 11 1 lr' TL�LL_ I I 1 i li I; i�.i�iL E3LT-. 1 1- -� ' _ �, _ J ThLL- T ]L7,io u.SwrIL_... �Lt�TJPiIr11 11 �` 1 i i � I ] I I! ,� . ;E- [ IriflREEEr 1J , ' fl I [ i,-I- - r `, 1- 1L►., 11 _i i Jr--.-- L�I . i il ma. LA ,.. 1 i [ _It JJL-C JL �}J ( v l( r rTir ill P ill i'1 ;I �tl J'-'1_ ! „ I'I r IC �1 i R-lip LOST DUTCHMAN I I, I (� _ _' 11 BLVD Z I I I. � 'r ;I II I 'f Ej 1 _---= ) r Ir T-r1r �L 1 -I� 1r I \ I , J i -�" �I 1 '/Z �, EL I i 1_;4 t I `..'_�. 1 r _ C ; 1 flLLJflLILLLI I �. _ ._ _ c�LT] It ts L JL-J�.JL_ _ 11 use r 131 ; 7; EY F1 .HH I L 1L IL_JL�_l�� I _ _ _ _ E��, ut�o a eO jr �7 - l(�Jt 1 [ nmrrnr>1 11 , OCmO `il ,101 , C JLLT1r I I El: -IL L__IEOOEU�IWDOOO IL I -I - 'E- i _ li I1IREDOCKILJLIVDMULTJI I -rr 1 1 u - x lr _-ir 1 u- 1 - nr1 - ' IF 111 L inl innnr- ell‘, 0TrActftoE T No 3 TONTO NATIONAL FOREST -:-,• •E•i• • • . j l f , . .. .. • • ••••• ... 1 1 a �.,s•. - 1 .u,., zT'•„ .. . ; . •••••••• •.• • • . . • • :3 ::; : ......... _____.., ...i, 1 _nr--- -pr T Tr • 1-_.•:I'. _ • •Hr 'r �„ • •..i. '•L. _ i CC _;� s , . .. •••• • ttr, •••• u.. • If •.••, •• • •,—., two I:_._.... �+.�'s•s.•- ":-! •• •• E a._.... ..._7-i • .ewe.. ;144 4 F... .,r_., 7' -. 6.----—; - 1;'----* .-ii:::71i--.• 1 • r•c••l• ..,r. , • _1_ c- -....-..--r-,...r•-•r--f--.,-• •-•-•11, • L.•• . p,_irii . 1 •,. i . • •• • .,..... ... . . . : .,::,,..if_. , i .. . • L JI•LL.J. . 1JLiL•• • . AT•C iY Tec ' ^c` rrlt� . . .-• . .;1. 6''ttl,(Vii,r.11 / VA,1.,..' ' .. .. •�..f'�. �� �X :�,:' f'' a C.rii` [! / 'C % . - (i aacr r -s r* rt. r'...r� .t,, , . ,fir . . r� C_ITY PAR K*1:E``,cj.tC.. • C P • ••••••t• Nr 2.e.-crl,....el• ,t(.,‘, ...-c•••,..2- N••=r- ' ' ` rCl r ^ 4,•1I'eii: •• ecC ' � • :: A. : �. cow aeiv:i •• • . • -• I ,.4•• I,4 I • : • "'.7.,CL . . :Ei..Li II : e CONTROL • . . J'---11 IF,. • II • :. : . , -4 •••04. > lc 73 % k: _J:�tL JE Ic ..� ii _JL ._ . .p. n • •• I I 7„,.,i::...4•i4 i••• .r , . i .1L.. . •:. . . I. 1� . .. i�._._3 ?C___ 3L:J _Ji__L_ ; . . , • ••• • .7,--11- -..71 ---1,-----1E-:-.T r."1.:=4;:-... • li .. ' Ail • :• ^ % , /_ V g r .yi1- iti• m!1 . . —-mac . ,,. t 1" , 1 . ± . f`�1 C`3C]Eal[•�E�OL1:D Mti 0 0 . . . ',� , I I �7t. �1 '� LI�o _ ,' h101�11_ID . C f 101`1f_ I'ARI\ _ �/ �/ i 'A r • _ C B- 1Y l[J J 1 W . F O �--v— ...... /1 `-- //C6 .t 1 h r �. ij N w Z L I- L.. / V r` i r r '..(I • N Lr tll N I - J w W O O •t (la N 4 1- (.. F-- U _Li I [Y [1' U�I— CY E: (Y O r- D I- x I �- Hwy60 - 80 - 89 _1 0 20 - f" .° ( 111v1+UN oo i 1 ,i + IKt ;lIlLul�� 9 SA14t30S --r-- --- --- 'S T 1 T 10N \, ;,TA110r1 XI-o' I30. 1 ' t'L�IvL J. • CB -2 Xd C (� _2 I In I IZZA LEISURE 1 ^ � a'---...,..„w1-- [JJ I �uwn a 'v I' I O IIUT PLAZA WEST �� i ) N, Ul- Z _ .( �`-- i _1_ � .ter —_- - _i�._� / I_E I SUR` (� z)150 I I G R N ___,! ' C Q E R PLAZA LAST G [� _ uPeris'rlTlo(1 '� l lJ 1 1 I _�� a I 4 i4e I PLAZA I` �, (-,2U u.c ,c<+ 2A1 •mod 1 �!� W -- eAN1, • ^' 0 1- x .c o I i .� a W `.1 W �• I I F 1 . 7- II . . - 1 F7J-/- , lI, I - 1 _ 1 1 1 1.9 . ` ,,2j . C_./I . = f-1 1Q / R RA EN T R A D A 4yt r F. 1 __I., _ SE 1"": 4. _ l � i ! _ 1ISI N ' / ill S U BD V 0 1 1 1 i .r O J 1 I rn. J I �• -- CR - 5 = m F O — Z 11 �.► r 111. LS c..c A POR1 ION OF THE Si, SEC 20 T1 N R8E P I NAL CO AR ZONA SCALE 1 IN. = II0O FT. A I I POTS 1 b I O 27 ...,-._.. na ':..+ad.«+.04,-*.1+7w,YI :i::°i't�°irld is " `I iN' _)I 1 _ ._ _. _. ._ I I I ��l 1 i— _ .- ..... — ... �.. - .... .... r ) I I I r v;O A7ncyAF 7-- No S ¢v U act .� NATIONAL FOREST t � G Q �P¢P��, C `ro,° 0 ? ,r MARIC0PA CO. D ::. ..•. ::.;::-.*:44.••�=•*"4 PtNAL CO. 6 5 4 ... ' rAtirffdr ..... P.40".-414. .. *.." ••••...,/..•.'c al.• ',,' :„'••::•••.••• -.-.i:::-:-.::.:SA.):./„' :................:.- i NNittiii-i.iclii :•::.*•-:.:-.4. '•' 13 . h\IN.N,ilk àh1 : ! 24 0..4.4.%.0.1.\.g.r%...,I\.L,. ... .......•...4.S.:....\..\.&.N.....i...'....-:•::.:..-..;.::.::.l.::%..;..:.:...i .....:.:..r.•.. .!..e..V..t4.._.'4..f:.,.eP.:„..:,.•d4•-:....::-:.s:..:-••r:.:*...:.e.:...:.:i..•:,: .1...t.•••.•„•••A.%-zI.•. • A \ . . ::: 25 o . .:.\ 33 34 3 ::Wy •.;::;::::: t T 1 N ..:..:.::.:: TIN : .:.:...:.:. :: :•.:.:::::: TIS ::9.:. ::::.•:-.•.:::•1: •:. : .• ::• • TOTAL SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY w Id CO CD tim cc cc State Land • B,L.M. 1- --.1 BLM/SRP E STATE PARK GOVERNT�ENT LAND OWNERSHIP p 2 3 Figure No . G-4 SCALE 1N M4LES RV'Ac k' c T 42.° 7 UA N. 10111 , ` �2 T^: IT rm it "ay Concern S''_,J' An t'Plysis of and Recommendations for Changes to the Apache Junction General Plan f2001 �'a �I ��� C O L rf =9 I - Assumptions: 1. That theCouncil feels that Anache Junction needs a Teneral Plan. 2. Thlt the plan would be used as a guide for future planning and planning and zoning decisions by theCity Council and t, & 7 Commission and, therefore, all of its contents should be acceptible to a majority of the City Co1:.ncil en. 3. That in our best judgement, t.}-is elan should provide for a 'carped-crib and str nsthing of the tax base to preclude an undo burden on the real estate tax payers in the near future. Lt. That it would provide protect ion to Ruard against a nossible future water shortage, but not at the expense of reasonable rrudert growth of the city and surrcuning zone of influence. 5. That the we--id nrovide for orderly or-,ani7ed growth that vould encourage investors an•i should not portray such a bleak future that Tiould discourage investment as the apparent over-react Lon to a possible future water shorta--e. 6. U nlan . nr ri ,. basis ^s ^i t an ':^ham t t F n_�n t.��.;13. _cz de soL d for re-cl=- si_�ca., of to rF veruo lard to a hi her class _ _ca'_cn tU-at 'ouli er rnce the value of the lard, nro'ri e for me d?tmt density to ercourt-ge grot:th at a reasonable rate and still Provide the lifestyles desired oy the majority of our residents. This re-classification would oe done by the Council and P&Z inIt1^tive. II - Analysis o2 the Apache Junction general Plan 1/2001. 1. An apparent over-reaction,over-kill of existing and future water shorta?e in reference to ground water. 2. Too much consideration to the desires of the hoe emen by providing approximately 70% of the residential zones to low density and one (1) acre miminum lots with provisions for horses, thereby leaving only 30% for those who do not de sl-e horse pr i veleige s. 3. Too many low density areas designated within the corporate limits; most of these should be designated median density areas to allow for reasonable prudent growth to broaden our tax base. L. Does provide for ade-uate business opportunity areas and in-iustr..al areas, 5. Does provide fcr aderuate parks and recreation areas and school and anst_H.tional areas. R.. O 2 4!/LI/7 A'z'e-P 6. Do' s provide for a ?equate governmental areas. 7. 1 ces orovi i.e. for adequate se-;age IL•-nosa1 altern ttves. R. Docs ot provide a detailed end '.esir:ole transportation Dl-r. Ii - Pecorrr^endat_ons: inat consl dertion be given to make the follo?n.ng chenges prior to adopt on of this nla n by the Council. 1. In vie-7 of .",e assur itlons stated ar par. 1 asove with referent-ems to the horsemcns' dos'res on lands t-at Ile ;n tnin the coroor"te limits, that t'r'y ne delt r _th on a case oy -sis as re-classification is requests-d; a de:iz_t.e tect'_On for 1sndo—ner s is al_"c' ly orovi led for it tne . Z Or it-lance. 2. mat tre to r density ar''as within the corocrate limits be deslr-iated Me li�xn density areas. 3. Tn-,t free ray-off ranns s-ry as ular_nea 7)y t,e S-. ,te at Tomnaha-,=k and Iron rood roads and, at a later date, ar off-r' -n^ be considered at 11-3.ho road. „ �A it-A-ututi 7- ND /y ATTAcNti+ T A./O• 8 downtown commercial areas, and public uses such as the government center, parks, and open space. 5) Two new residential zoning districts which would allow the current 14-acre minimum General Rural zoning district to be changed to a one-acre minimum permanent zone should be developed. One of the districts should permit mobile homes; the other should not. Both should provide for the keeping and use of horses. 6) A Special Use Permit procedure should be developed and should allow certain uses to be approved by permit within certain districts. Guidelines for map changes are 1) In the preparation of recommendations concerning residential zoning districts which currently permit intensities higher than the low h,Ea.0 w” density residential land use classification, the Commission may choose to not recommend changes at this time for some to all of those certain higher zoned areas. (Note: See discussion under residential land use recommendations. ) All other zoning districts should be changed to comply with the Land Use Map. 2) Areas indicated as "opportunity areas" are the secondary land use classification. Such classifications should be reviewed on merit and, if warranted, the zone change in the future should be approved. However, such changes should be reserved until : a) There is existing zoning in compliance with the proposed Land Use Map, the existing zoning which may be adjusted at this time in intensity; or b) There is a future application for rezoning. Rezoning by planned development zoning district should be strongly encouraged for these areas. (s; ,.vsc=- i- / -st 9e) 3) In applying the new one-acre minimum residential zoning districts , selecting the appropriate district should reflect the housing style in the area. 4) All parks, government facilities, and school sites should be zoned "Special Public Interest - Public Use" (SPI-P) . Spot Zoning- "Spot rezoning" petitions should be discouraged. Such rezonings should be considered an inappropriate land use. "Spot rezoning" is any zoning request that would give a zoning district classification which is substantially different from surrounding zoning to one small area, especially one parcel of land. In determining whether a certain zoning classification is substantially different, several factors may be considered, including harmony, size, and comparison with the General Plan (Land Use Plan) For example 2-50 •� •• AITACHn*E.,T No. / C071 r7 N u tc For that area along U.S. Highway 60 East of Idaho Road, the outer boundary of the commercial opportunity area may be considered to include part to all of any lot which is partially or totally within the two hundred feet wide boundary. However, each rezoning application should be by Planned Development and each case acted upon based on .•. the merit of the request. \ 11 F FT- ( ( . _ 1._ ..,_. ---1 .. . , . ow .ml•••••• amemniamm lime 4.. MNINNIMININIIII ammulm. .......4.L.a. _WIPINPRIMIR 10111MINIMMIND ......, . ...,....,. d _ 01111.••••■•••10 ter lT1 hf- - Il . � a N'*' ‘7 —I. I .t1 1 --i I j+:. /1 1 " .I: ,TT_1L4 , T — .. �ire, __L_ 1 LJ4LIr� r-d.LL i~i air L.._._ _ uhthrli _ ..� y 1 1 1 i ' �' Cu ,� _ 1 i r1 ! __ _H % 11 "'1' _ �[ I 'I M► -q 1 f ,.f ' I h,_ 1 RJ31LiJ ' - y I, „tea fTr1 , 1MI1 \\\\ i t • ' • N` (-, .� _ ,., imiLTh;;11C?}III I 1 Ii 1- \ '' ,4 , ---r ). 7 r,41 in. . 17_ ,1 --71 II "" 1 ' FL:::::.4,. 1 tt 111 FT t t • 4 I ! 1�iJ.i�l_l ,IJ • 0y-- __ I . ti - i ,\ \ E x El-- ILI -L Lr.,,.lid- , I i I . _ -�- r �r , _ A% ► j u'�' r'1n �J1 1L1 JU `' �` C 0 , L� ` �:'1. "- t�1 I r -� - r 1 �(° N 1 1 h '�1; 1 I I U❑oet11 LJL IL_� _ , '1111 'l I'.lI �4+4 I 1 _ - `_ I ❑OE3� D -- lot ,•••- -- - r ti I I in °1h , , t _-1 I - a❑DBEIBBDmD®❑D❑©E 0 I -1. ' 1� ''� --� ti , o. II' 11 -1 I 1 ■SOODDD❑®L JU[� D®. C� . �•• N _ ,Li. 11 wq P'fM+'� '.. :Irt, J Ili al1 �m®EI8B1O❑❑❑C_�HD�L4 F I-h - - 1 ' ' N NJ! ►---t►1� I Ir AEI ,.._: 1 '■BRD❑e❑❑❑ r e®©a - �Il l� j1._,�=. ' . [-LI li'l: 0111 - ❑aaeem❑ommmnaarT I L_I _ 17JL I it. ,1 i s;,� ' ■❑ ® DE CREOCI❑D ■I i. HV DUIBOEBB❑ ❑®❑c ]�l1il'I. 11 is b ...�. _ � a I -■❑BB❑❑ED ©e❑L DEET 1-i- 7 _ �� 1 ❑e®e e❑am c D 1 I ra---::"--- ti ED®DE1EED�nLLC� - L_ u► 1 . _ . 11 11n ' tt _I __I. . 1 ti 1M 11 it i■ 1-,r �.'`.11 � I r 1�N ^ L- I r I� ATmC4ME+4T fJo . 9 As discussed under Population, the maximum population for the area, considering all conditions, is 83,000 persons. (See, also, water analysis . ) Residential population allocations are set forth as. follows: Area Population Residential Acres Available Assumption Existing 30,348 N/A Existing I 23,110 9,918 $ 2.33 i_ersons/ acre II 17,123 4,598 83.72 persons/ acre III 12,419 3,335 8 3.72 persons/ acre TOTAL: 83,000* 17,851 *Does not include the population projections for Mesa Del Oro which is in the Arizona Water certificated area. Assuming an additional 10,000 population Would drop the Area II and Area III average to 2.46 parsons per acre . Within Area I, the 2.33 persons per acre is assumed on the basis of one dwelling unit per acre. The Area I population is assumed as a firm figure and the housing style for each area should be maintained. Areas II and III have the residual population potential after subtracting the existing popula- tion, plus the Area I assumed population potential . If development would occur according to existing zoning, a density far in excess of 3.72 persons per acre would occur. Therefore, when the first of the following events occurs, the City Council should cause, by direction, the corresponding action to occur: Event Action To Be Considered The Planning Commission should The Commission should consider, by review, on an annual basis, Commission Initiative, reversion of community growth factors to all parcels of land undeveloped and determine when the population zoned medium and high density to a approximates 2.33rp ersons per 8 low density classification. acre in the remainder of the n�ed,,,4„► area designated for -1e44 density residential development in Area II . The Planning Commission should Based on the population growth and review, after four years from water availability, make appropriate adoption, the General Plan and adjustments to Area II on the Land all elements. Use Map and other recommendations. The Central Arizona Project (CAP) Based, on the population growth and water supply is assured to the water availability, make appropriate Apache Junction area. adjustment to Area II on the Land Use Map and other recommendations . Area III should be reserved for growth and development, and master planned only after one of the following events occurs: 2-43 ATTACHMENT NO. 10 STAFF IS IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARING AN AMENDED LAND USE MAP. ,., Alf A cH AA ex+r No. 11 SUMMARY OF CONSULTANT'S RECOMMENDATIONS 1 ) There needs to be a resolution of the conflict between the different roadway elevations on U.S, Highway 60 east of Idaho Road. 2) Private access onto U.S. Highway 60 from abutting property should be prohibited except where a permit has been issued by ADOT and approved by the city. 3) Allow road intersections with U.S. Highway 60 at 4 mile intervals, with median crossovers, skewed intersections, and design to allow for driver and pedestrian safety. 4) Local streets be developed according to a functional classification, allowing for numerous local streets to now be developed as thorough- fares, providing that all properties have access. (The classification system, geometries, and rights-of-way are set forth in the recommended plan. ) 5) A filing system for inventorying all traffic control devices should be installed according to the "Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices." 6) The city sould develop a bicycle route plan and implement it. 7) According to performance standards to be developed, sidewalks should be installed. 8) There should be developed an equestrian trail system. 9) The city should develop a transit system. 10) The city should develop a preferential routing plan for major streets, 11 ) State Route 88 should be rerouted to extend southerly from i.ts inter- section with Idaho Road to the proposed Superstition Freeway. The intersection of Idaho Road with U.S. Highway 60 should be signalized, Provision for the redesign of the intersection of U.S. Highway 60 and existing State Route 88 needs to be accomplished. Finally, a trans- portation plan to accommodate the commercial interest must be an integral part of any changes made to the area. 12) The city should recommend to the Arizona Department of Transportation that the proposed Superstition Freeway have ramps in the Apache Junction area, being at Idaho Road and Tomahawk Road, eliminating the proposed ramp at Ironwood Drive. ' m%ae. 5-8 ATf'A cH u4&IQ r No. 1 Z Air School Board, and the business community to review and conclude a recommended freeway ramp plan to be submitted to the Arizona Department of Transportation. The viable ramp alternatives perceived at this time include the following alternatives: 1 ) Keeping the present proposed ramps at Ironwood Drive and Tomahawk Road. 2) Keeping the present proposed ramps at Ironwood Drive and Tomahawk Road, but adding a third ramp at Idaho Road. 3) Having ficcway ramps at Idaho Road and Tomahawk Road. In addition, the report should investigate the possible alternatives of 1 ) redesignating the southern end of State Route 88 from the point of intersection with Idaho Road to head southerly to the intersection with the Superstition Freeway, or 2) create a State Route 88 Business Loop which would connect with the proposed Superstition Freeway, or 3) do nothing with regard to this matter. The Commission expresses the following concerns which should be in- vestigated as part of the study: 1 ) The safety of pedestrians on Ironwood Drive and Idaho Road with particular emphasis at school locations. 2) The continuation of existing businesses. 3) The expectations of property owners. 4) Not upsetting the long-term economic growth of the community that may or may not be limited to a proposed freeway. 10) With regard to the traffic situation in the vicinity of U.S Highway .-. 60 and State Route 88, city officials should continue to expeditiously seek a solution with the Arizona Department of Transportation. This traffic area is an existing situation and a traffic signal warrant has been determined for the intersection of Idaho Road with U.S. Highway 60. However, it is perceived that other considerations need to be re- solved and that the implementation of the signal may be predicated upon other design considerations. Therefore, an expeditious effort is recommended to review and determine the best solution. That solu- tion must consider the business interests in the area. 11 ) The city should request the special equestrian study committee with the Planning and Zoning Commission to determine the feasibility of and to make recommendation for using a portion of the one-hundred feet arterial rights-of-way located north and east of the Salt River Project kilo volt power lines for equestrian easements and trails as part of the public right-of-way and connecting to the adjacent natural resource areas. 5-10 r. ATTM44 p•+T' NO. r3 the city should, by Commission Initiative, consider establishing a public use zone. In addition, the city should discuss with the State Land Depart- ment the possibility of a property acquisition. The city complex site plan is set forth on Figures L-8 and L-9 in the Land Use Element and the city complex report, which contains the justification, is adopted by reference. COMMERCIAL USES No commercial uses exist within the section at this time. Two nodes at the intersection of Superstition Boulevard and Tomahawk Road and at the intersection of State Route 88 at Tomahawk Road are designated as "local commercial opportunity areas," although the general land use is designated as low density residential . RECOMMENDATIQNS Should applications by planned development for local commercial zoning be submitted, the city should review the applications and approve, if found to be in the neighborhood and community interest. RESIDENTIAL USES The area is currently zoned General Rural (GR) which is a holding classification, but allows residential development of one dwelling per 14-acre lot, including right-of-way easements. The sewage disposal alternatives report for Apache Junction indicates that the northern and eastern portions of the section are in a transition soil type. Wastewater disposal is by individual septic system within the city. By individual site analysis, if an area is in the poorer soil type one dwelling unit per acre is recommended. The other soil type allows one dwelling unit per 10,000 square feet. 8-Zo The water availability analysis has indicated no more thanv3.72 persons per acre be permitted in the city until such time as an assured water supply is available. Using 2.33 persons per dwelling, the average number of persons per household in Apache Junction, means about -6-dwelling/ per acre, not counting off-site requirements. I) RECOMMENDATIONS MedLvw. The General Plan indicates 4-ew- density residential land use for the section and the remainder of the city currently unsubdivided and not having existing higher zoning. The plan does indicate that when the water question is resolved, a review of the residential densities should be performed. Be- cause of the soils in the area, individual on-site requirements may limit 6-4 ;•,i.Yii:YV]b:'ia�tisr/�!::V:vY%f'M.�..�:+1.✓....� RESOLUTION NO. 82-1 A resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, adopting the Apache Junction, Arizona, general plan entitled "Apache Junction 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," which includes, but is not limited to, a land use element, sewage disposal alternatives, water systems analysis, a circulation (transportation) plan, and a Section 16 master plan, and accepts as reference the reports "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Amok Junction, Arizona;" and adopts as part of the general plan the documents entitled "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona " WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of S 9-461, Arizona Revised Statutes, each planning agency (Planning and Zoning Commission) shall prepare and the legislative body of the municipality (City Council) shall adopt a comprehensive, long-range general plan for the development of the municipality, and WHEREAS, there is substantial state lands within several adjacent miles of Apache Junction, and the Arizona State Legislature did pass the Urban Lands Bill which places additional responsibility on local govern- mental agencies to plan the future development of the urban state lands; and WHEREAS, the coordination of services in the Apache Junction area requires the cooperation of Apache Junction and Pinal County officials, and Pinal County officials do request the recommendation of the various cities ••�«��- :. ::-.' on rezoning and subdivision applications within three miles of the muni- cipal limits, and WHEREAS, through a grant obtained with the assistance of Governor Bruce Babbitt from the Four Corners Regional Commission, certain studies on water, sewage disposal, and transportation have been performed to provide a data base and also to identify areas needing further long-term study, and WHEREAS, the general plan has been prepared by the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission with the assistance of a Land Use Plan Com- mittee after much diligent study and investigation, and WHEREAS, the proposed general plan has been properly advertised and distributed, and public hearings, as required by the Arizona Revised Statutes, have been held, and WHEREAS, the general public has been afforded the opportunity to comment on the proposed plan, those comments receiving dutiful consideration; and WHEREAS, the Arizona Revised Statutes do provide an amendment pro- cess to adopted general plans, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, as follows. 1 That certain document entitled "Apache Junction 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," is hereby adopted and approved as the general plan of the city of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona 2 Those certain documents entitled "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona," are hereby adopted in concept by reference as part of the general plan of the city of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona ..._. ."�. .-il"•-r.."rbt,. t._yFyt�ti-w+.�trrz«x:s OIN Resolution No. 82-1 Page Two 3. Those certain reports entitled "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona," and "A Transportation Plan M.,, x " for Apache Junction, Arizona," are hereby accepted as part of the data documentation and made a part of the general plan Acceptance of the reports does not necessarily imply agreement with the recommendations contained therein 4 The Apache Junction City Council hereby requests and directs the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission to submit a status report to the City Council prior to the first day of February of each year, including any proposals for amend- -----•--•- - - - ment of the general plan. 5. The Apache Junction City Council hereby requests that Pinal County officials adopt the Apache Junction General Plan as an amendment to the Pinal County General Plan, including those areas where recommendations have been made outside the Apache Junction city limits, but in Pinal County. 6 The Apache Junction City Council hereby requests the Arizona State Land Department and the Bureau of Land Management to fully consider this general plan in making decisions which affect lands under their authority and which are located within the general plan study area BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forward certified copies of this resolution to the governor of the state, U.S Secretary of the Interior, Commissioner of the Arizona Land Department, Director of the Phoenix Office of the Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Congressional Delegation, and the Arizona State Dele- gation representing this area PASSED THIS DAY OF , 19 , by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona. Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David F . Alexander City Attorney -'`.w,•: 'E,..,aaa':� +:r5'bc'.-,�wi'w+/ -:.aS,.rw+;7+'-r`,.�=�a CO n urn a Q=10) Bruce Babbitt tale ilattb lirvarfmati Governor 1E24 WEST ADAMS Joe T Palllni Commissioner PHOENIX ARIZONA 85007 255-4621 January 19 , 1982 Honorable Mayor Wendell Clarke HAND DELIVERED City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road r"71 7 ; '`; t,77:7 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 d Chairman, Mildred Baker Planning and Zoning Commission 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mayor Clarke and Chairman Baker : The Land Department has received the proposed General Plan along with the numerous supporting documents. I have had my staff carefully re- view the General Plan. They have contacted Apache Junction Planning personnel in the review process . The preparation of the Plan is well documented and presented. The Land Department generally concurs with the Plan with the exception of the items identified below. I respectfully request your consideration of the following concerns : SECTION 16 , TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST 1. The State Land Department urges Apache Junction to request the Maricopa County Flood Control District to move the proposed dike to the north of Section 16 . The proposed site of Apache Junction Dam, although providing necessary flood protection, re- stricts possible future development of a large portion of Sec- tion r. 16 . The result is a substantial reduction of revenues ge- nerated by potential development of that acreage . The land in Section 16 has a greater development potential and is more valuable than lands to the north. In addition, the average height of the structure (+/- 20 feet) , will partially obstruct the panoramic mountain views enjoyed from Section 16 thus reducing the value of the remaining Trust lands in the section . Upon investigation, we believe that the dam can be moved north- erly without damaging the integrity of the flood control system, without interfering with the utility lines , and without sub- stantial cost to any party involved. 2 . We believe that in the future, Section 16 should accommodate a mix- ture of medium and high density development throughout the southern portion of the section with supportive commercial development. Such a land use pattern would provide support for the commercial and gov- ernmental centers . The section is currently slated for low density residential development. I understand the current water and sewer problems leading to this classification. However , in the interest of the State Trust and Apache Junction, we believe that the resi- dential portions of Section 16 proximate to the government complex, park and "downtown" commercial area, be ultimately developed with medium and high density residential usage. .� SECTION 32 , TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST 1. The General Plan calls for substantial acreage to be reserved for Central Arizona College in the northeast quarter of Section 32 . The Central Arizona College institutional taking , however , only applies to 40 acres in the NWNE of the section. The remaining acreage should be plannned for general commercial use at the pro- posed freeway interchange and residential use , perhaps multi-family to accommodate the student population . GENERAL COMMENTS 1 . The classification of State Trust lands south of the proposed Super- stition Freeway as light industrial opportunity will benefit Apache Junction and the State Trust. 2 . The State Land Department would like to see the City of Apache Junc- tion implement a sewer system. In the long run, it would benefit both Apache Junction and the State Trust. A sewer system could pro- vide the means for Apache Junction to accommodate the anticipated population growth. It would also promote a compact and efficient growth pattern. Thank you for the opportunity to review these proposed plans . We look forward to working with you to resolve the points addressed above , and to implement the recently enacted Urban Lands Management Act . Sincerely, / Joe T. allini / State Land Commissioner Enclosure JTF/KG/c]w cc: Mr . Joe Gero, Planning Director City of Apache Junction ( 1()Le dO PINAL COUNTY DISTRICT 2 SUPERVISOR POST OFFICE BOX 827 FLORENCE,ARIZONA 85232 TELEPHONES• JAMES J.KARAM,JR. OR FLORENCE 868.5801 "Jimmy" POST OFFICE BOX 248 SUPERIOR,ARIZONA 85273 SUPERIOR 689.5606 : " It =- c i tc.'i+ ^. January 4, 1982 Honorable Wendell J. Clarke, Mayor City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Clark: Thank you for your letter of December 28, 1981 , as it related to your proposed general plan. Prior to the receipt of your plan, I went on a field trip with Mr. Gero and several others that were in attendance. Because of the trip I was rather familiar with the proposal . A copy was forwarded to Mr. Terry Smith, Director of Planning, for his comments, which have been mostly favorable. I , too, think the plan is great and see no immediate problems. Your Director, Mr. Gero, and your Council , are to be commended for such a fine and well thought out plan. As of now, if things do not change with me, I will be with you during your public hearing. Thanks for keeping me posted. Verrsi cerely yours, �, vi /3ames J. Karam Jr. , Superyisor /JJNAL COUNTY-DISTRICT NO. 2 JJK:pe CC. Terry Smith, Planning & Zoning Director Bernie Minter, Highway Engineer A. ?OHALC C CENTRAL ARIZON S ASSOCIATION P O41, OF GOVERNMENTS 1810 MAIN ST P 0 DRAWER JJ ,ice \�= FLORENCE,AZ 85232 i'\ PHONE(602)868 5878 JOHN A.BLACKBURN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GION inuary 13, 1982 �. ' 1, r_ " ] Mayor Wendell J. Clarke City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Street Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mayor Clarke: In reference to your letter of December 28 the CAAG staff is submitting the following comments on specific sections of the proposed general plan for Apache Junction. The comments are the result of a fairly detailed reading of the general plan but not the result of a detailed analysis of the plan. 1 - Apache Junction 2001: The General Plan for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona Staff review results in no major comments being offered on this document aside from the general acknowledgement that much research and thought was given to the preparation of the document. 2 - Sewage Disposal Alternatives Without knowledge of the agreement between PRC Toups and the City of Apache Junction on what the final product was to include, it is difficult to make a lot of specific comments on the above report. However, the followin; appeal to be deficiencies for which more attention would be desirable in a report of this nature: 1) It is very light in treatment of institutional aspects. For instance, undiscussed are complications in providing service to areas outside the city boundaries. Additionally, the opportunities and problems in establishing a sanitary district are unaddressed. 2) (P.7-1 and elsewhere) We believe that the longer the city waits to go to alternative 1 or 2, the more costly these will become in terms of constant dollars. It is generally more expensive to sewerize a developed area than one that is sparsely developed. GILA COUNTY GLOBE HAYDEN MIAMI PAYSON SAN CARLOS,WINKELMAN PINAL COUNTY APACHE JUNCTION CASA GRANDE COOLIDGE ELOY FLORENCE KEARNY.MANIMOTH,SUPERIOR ..der to Mayor Wendell J. Cla. .e "` Page 2 Dated: 1/13/82 3) (P.7-3) EPA funding should probably not be relied upon for planning future projects. There are other options that could also be discuss- ed. 4) Many more recommendations could have been made on the basis of the report. There really is nothing in terms of specific recommended actions. From a more positive perspective, the report is readable, logical, and informative- . especially regarding on-site system alternatives. 3 - Water Systems Analysis CAAG in general supports the concept that fewer service providers leads to greater efficiencies of service especially where smaller companies are competing alongside the larger companies. Efficiencies of scope are important from a cost of services to subscribers point of view. Some of the increase in rate proposals contained within the report point up the possibilities for consumer cost increases when effi- ciency of service slips over time and needed capital outlay is delayed into the future. We suggest that distance between hydrants might be reconsidered. Pg. 2-3, item 4 - Typo error Capitol (Capital) 6.1) " " strenghthened (strengthened) Pg. 2-4 - Top of Page 2) Might want to consider distance between hydrants as it relates to the ability of the fire service to store hose length on its pumpers and stretch same to reach site of fire. Some companies like no more than 500 feet between hydrants. Pg. 3-24 second Paragraph - Capitol (Capital) 4 - Population Analysis The science of population statistics and projections as applied to the burgeoning community of Apache Junction becomes often imprecise, occasionally unfair, and always time-critical. As regards the last aspect, it is obvious that the products of the 80 census were just beginning to flow as this work went to press. The in- clusion of data over 20 years old and conclusions from it were perhaps necessary in the summer of 1980 but could be reaccomplished with much greater reliability now. Without attempting to do this in a few brief comments, the following initial observations are offered. Figure 21, projected projection, is close as regards Apache Junction but other numbers are far off (such as Casa Grande and Coolidge being more than twice their actual '80 increases) . Following the urging of CAAG, the state has investigated, revised, and had ratified by POPTAC (Population Technical Advisory Committee) an increased Projection for Pinal County of over 138,000 by 2000 (versus page 11) . ,fir to Mayor Wendell J....klarke .�. Page 3 ,ated: 1/13/82 "Bank deposits and postal receipts" do not necessarily "make pretty good sta- tistical information in carrying out population estimates, trends, and projects". (p.9) A bank deposit by one migrating retired couple involving their life sav- ings and $100,000 realized from one-time tax-protected home sale would offset the typical savings balances of one hundred young working couples. Postal rate increases over the past decade have been "impressive". Numbers of accounts or addresses might be useful, but still less reliable than other sources. Even an ostensibly reliable indicator such as construction permits must be tempered by factors of speculation and economic fluctuation resulting in failures to proceed. Sub-county projections should be available from POPTAC by mid-year '82. The "occasionally unfair" reference above is directed at a problem especially acute in Apache Junction. Standard state and federal population census efforts center on declared permanent residence. The City is faced with peak demands for transportation, water, sewage, and other services driven by part-time populations. The case must be forcefully made at state and federal levels that allocations and assistance must include this consideration. 5 - Transportation Plan General Transportation Planners at CAAG endorse this product overall. Even with the ad- vent of the Superstition Freeway and on Idaho or Tomahawk connector to 60 and 88, it appears a thorough overhaul of the existing 60 and 88 intersection will be re- quired. .** Public Transporation Although only one paragraph in a fifty-page report, this aspect can be expected to play an increasing role in the City's quality of life and responsiveness to citizen needs, especially elderly and handicapped. CAAG will continue to provide suggestions and coordination in this area as it has done in assisting the City's '^ application for a Section 18, Urban Mass Transit System. Air Transportation Extensive comments on the airport proposal, briefly mentioned on page 47 of the report, will be forwarded to the City under separate cover. **Consideration could be given to a four-lane sunken corridor from approximately Thunderbird to Winchester for through traffic along 60. This would be advantageous for time, safety, aesthetic, and noise pollution factors. 6 - City Complex Planning Program The City Complex Planning Program which was designed by PRC Toups for the City of Apache Junction is an interesting plan that includes many aesthetically pleasing ideas. Information contained within this report seems to be based on good data. There are some areas that perhaps should be considered that were not noted in this plan: !ter to Mayor Wendell J. ClA4e r►. Page 4 sited: 1/13/82 1 - Site selection and general design - There is no mention as to whether the buildings will have a solar orientation. Proper orientation could save the City a significant amount of money in lower utility bills. Mounding earth against the west (hottest) side of the structures as well as shading this side with vegetation would also show a significant savings in utilities. 2 - Complex style - Territorial western or spanish style was chosen for the complex. Since this is such a traditional style were traditional building materials, such as adobe, considered for any part of this project? Adobe is an energy efficient material that can also save the user money in utility bills. It is also a very aesthetically pleasing material that would lend itself very well to the overall design of the proposed plan. 3 - Other - Since this complex is to be located in the "Sunny Southwest" have solar water heaters been considered? Once again, money may be saved by utilizing these devices. Apache Junction has the unique opportunity of designing their own city complex instead of inheriting one that was built many years ago when energy was cheap. It is with this in mind that the above ideas were mentioned. Sin erely, ' )//(/ , IP illi E < be "rry Regiona lanning Director cc: Joe Gero, Planning Director 18 75I> TERRY L SMITH ti PHIL C HOGUE Director '�+1 Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Pinal County Post Office Box D • Florence, Arizona 85232 r; ' ",`r E y :iC Telephone(602)868 5801,Ext 446 e A January 20, 1982 Mr. George Baljo, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Baljo, On behalf of the Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the fine presentation made regarding the proposed General Plan for the City of Apache Junction. Please accept the letter as an endorsement to your proposed General Plan and we hereby recommend the Plan be adopted by your Commission and City Council. Thank you for allowing us to review and comment on the well thought out plan. Sincerely, (6111 C. Hogue, Chairman PINAL COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PCH•kh CC. Mr. James J. Karam, Jr. Supervisor, District No.2 c)u 4ceom.,,, P.O.Box 1747 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 982-3141 January 19, 1982 Mayor Wendell Clarke City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Az., 85220 Honorable Mayor Clarke: At a recent Board of Directors meeting of the Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce, Mr. Gero presented the future plans for growth and development of the Apache Junction area. After some discussion, it was determined that an orderly plan for growth and development is absolutely necessary —and the plan as prepared by PRC Toups, a planning research Company of Phoenix, Arizona and presented. by Mr. Gero be adopted by the Apache Junction City Council. incerely, fle_x_g.c--c...) JA,'rmf an Hiller, President Copy to Mr. Gero Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce Talewt / to the SufZeRsLtiw.,9Zounituns, 198, y December 7, 1c)8l '� E u Ms. Mildred Baker, Chairman William A. Beaulieu Planning and Zoning Commission 306 E. Frontier 1001 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Jct. , AZ 85220 Apache ht. , A7 85?20 Dear Ms. Baker. I have reviewed the Land Use Map for the City of Apache Junction and can appreciate the amount of effort put into this study. Having discussed this plan with some of the available city officials and expressing my opinion. it was recommended that I write a letter stating my views. The five acre parcel situated on the northeast corner of Plaza Drive and Superstition Boulevard is owned by my wife and myself. The legal description is S1/2SWZSE1SEt, Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, G&SRB&M. Since this corner is the turning point for traffic from Superstition Boulevard into the "key" of the city, it should be recognized that this geographical location is the artery into the heart of the city. All traffic from the north going to the post office, A. 1. Bayless, and other businesses must turn at this entrance. Property situated on the highway, U.S. 60, is selling at $800.00 to $1 ,000.00 per front foot and some of this is listed for sale at $1 ,350.00 per front foot. My opinion, being associated with real estate in this area, is that it becomes very dill t t rill I or some %ma l l bust ne•,•,men I o est .thl I sh ,i Inc•,i'ie•. ... al I hese pr t, e s, , spit sally since property .teal !able Iut •. tic is . 0 I tntt (, d. Certainly some business establishments along Superstition Boulevard and Broadway Road would meet the needs necessary for this community. T recognize that the "Land Ike Ilan" sets aside commer( ia I usage at the se( t ion and go trtet se, t ion iunc Lures, however, uses of other properties at prima t nl ersec t. r ous may be best utilized for commercial purpose for the convenicuce and service of the patrons of Apache Junction. I suggest the corner properties on both the east and west side of Plaza Drive, north of Superstition; and, across the boulevard from the "key," designated as CB-2 usage, be reconsidered as CB-2 usage instead of the existing General Rural , a holding designation. Certainly, I say, and with utmost respect to you, C h it flu best use of Hies( p ircels is not Central Rural . titnc ( rely, c ' William"A. Beaulieu WAB/mav pc: Joe Cero Wendell Clarke Leo Frazier FLC,JD CONTROL DISTRICT DEC 2 , rs FLOOD CONTROLi 8� 1ST 1cT ;. ".; of A Maricopa County ,,HaRuora BOARD of DIRECTORS couir7 1959' 3335 West Durango Street • Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Tom Freestone, Chairman Telephone (602) 262-1501 Hawley Atkinson George L Campbell William D Mathews, P E , Chief Engineer and General Manager Fred Koory, Jr Ed Pastor " �l"ter,'`, DEC 171981 =� �K' C,"E Ms. Mildred Baker, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 RE: Apache Junction General Plan Dear Ms. Baker: We have reviewed the proposed general plan for the City of Apache Junction as requested in your letter dated November 19, 1981 . The following are our comments. The District recommends that the City adopt a drainage ordinance that requires all future development to at least maintain if not improve existing drainage conditions. In order to achieve this with urbanized development, it will be necessary to implement onsite stormwater runoff retention. Without retention, the increased runoff rates and volumes brought by urbanization will ultimately cause existing downstream drainage facilities to become inadequate for the original design frequency. As development approaches the proposed Superstition Freeway and the Central Arizona Project aqueduct, adequate consideration should be given to the drainage design frequency of those structures versus the drainage design of the future development. This will be especially significant for those developments upslope of the freeway and aqueduct. We appreciate your coordination with us. We hope to continue working together in the future as Apache Junction grows. Sincerely, ---(„). /itd.06,,,,,./ W. D. Mathews , P. E. � czar Y OF MESA G ARIZONA C JJ e PLANNING AND i 4t" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT cYIRIZON [* copy December 23, 1981 Mildred Baker, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Ms. Baker. Thank you for the draft copy of the Apache Junction General Plan and support- ing documentation which was supplied to our office. I am sure preparation of this plan involved a great deal of time--both of your staff and your commission--for which you are to be commended. As you know, a general plan is more than just another book. A general plan can. * Establish a sense of direction for the community. * Help set priorities on public improvements and services to be provided. * Coordinate public and private actions to help the community run smoothly. * Identify problem areas which will require additional attention to resolve. * Provide a sound informational base upon which to base future land use and land development decisions. . . . and much more. In a "new" community like Apache Junction it is particularly important to have a plan for the future. Apache Junciton, I feel , is at a crossroads. It's past was that of a rural small town--but its future is that of a rapidly growing city on the edge of a very large metropolitan area. Consequently, the challenges Apache Junciton will face in the future will be somewhat dif- ferent from those of the past. The type and scale of your challenges will change as Apache Junction becomes more of a city, and less of a town. All-AMOKA cm 55 NORTH CENTER STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 1466 • 85201 • (602)8.34-2011 ' '� That's why a general plan is so important. It can help your community to achieve your goals, so that you can prepare for the future--rather than allowing the future to take you by surprise. Population growth will undoubtedly be one of the main issues facing Apache Junction in the future. It's coming, there is no question about that, but how you prepare for it--and handle it once it arrives--is always within your control . Apache Junction needn't be innundated by more people than you can handle. Water systems, sewer systems and street systems all have a certain "carrying capacity", and if that capacity is exceeded difficulties can be anticipated. The role of the city then is to decide when and how the "carrying capacity" can be increased, or the demand kept within tolerable limits. Apache Junction is to be commended on the work you have done thus far in preparation of the General Plan--and commended in advance for the work that lies ahead to see that your plan is successfully implemented. Sincerely, 2) WavneeBBalri er Y Assistant Planning Director/ Community Development Coordinator WB:db 19 8f f0A c MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT E PLANNING AND '' Gyp 0 DEVELOPMENT ©M 111 S 3rd Avenue,Room 300,Phoenix,Arizona 85003—Phone(602)262-3201 ,� J November 24, 1981 COPY Joe Gero, Director of Planning City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Joe: Thank you for sending Maricopa County a copy of the proposed Apache Junction General Plan. At present we have no comments, however, we will conduct a brief review for consistency with plans for eastern Maricopa County. A copy of your plan has been placed in our permanent file at the County Building. We at the County are encouraged by the efforts of the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission to comprehensively plan for one of the fastest growing areas in the State. If we can be of help in the future, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, DON E. McDANIEL, JR. , DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Dudley Onde4onk Principal Planner Advance Planning Division DO/na ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Adm.. OFFICE MEMO January 15, 1982 _.._may. 196, 2 TO: ART AUERBACH Chief Regional Planner FROM: RONN EDWARDS `- 7 . a 4 ..:n Oyu Regional Planner SUBJECT: Review of Apache Junction Transportation Plan * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I have completed the review of the September, 1981 Transportation Plan for Apache Junction and have the following comments: (1 ) The plan does an adequate job of covering the basic elements of the transportation planning process. The plan promotes a balanced transportation system, addresses future transporta- tion needs, describes the existing system, considers safety conditions and discusses other modes of transportation including public transit, pedestrians, bicycles, horse trails, and air. (2) The plan does not address the elderly and handicapped. (3) One issue that you should be aware of that may create poten- tial conflict is the selection of arterial streets to be provided with an interchange along the Superstition Freeway. The Apache Junction plan suggests that interchanges be con- structed at Idaho and Tomahawk Roads as opposed to existing plans for interchanges at Ironwood and Tomahawk Roads. I would suggest that the District office and the Transportation Planning Division of the Arizona Department of Transportation be asked to submit comments on this issue. (4) Overall , the goals of the Apache Junction plan are compatible with those of the "Guide For Regional Development and Trans- portation." (l7,1;') RONN EDWARDS t•8-9590 2/75 lraamcaLr 6-954l ... ` .r0 o or ,$t/ 1N REPLY REFER TO tiF 8; United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT PHOENIX DISTRICT OFFICE 2929 WEST CLARENDON AVENUE jr," PHOENIX. ARIZONA 85017 January 4, 1982 Mildred Baker, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Ms. Baker: We have reviewed the Proposed Apache Junction General Plan and have no comments regarding the contents of the future plans. However, we note that there are discrepancies in the land ownership, usually between BLM and State of Arizona, in the areas surrounding the city. These errors do not directly affect you General Plan but do reflect significant differences of how these lands could be acquired, developed and costs. I have enclosed a map showing State and Federal ownership. If more specific information is needed, please contact me. Figures no. G-4, L-1 through L-7 and Land Use Map appendix are affected. Developr'ent of the adjoining BLM lands will depend on qualified applicants and viable proposals. We have already been contacted by Central Arizona College for an alternate other then identified in your plan. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. p Sincerely yours, l(//,•47( (X.,t-AZA C/1" Robert E. Archibald, Jr. 7 Area Manager Phoenix Resource Area Enclosure t^ y•-.cr►T - 45 R8E 30' (THEODORE RtOS f im � r u STATUS LEGEND 1 4 ___.`.. ..,1_, r�� _ _1 _ y- _ +_�_.: _ -_KTomahawk --- --- Public Lands(Administered By of d f if e l d ( M of u n t a i n is I • 1 Bureau of Land Management) I e�1?do9 Cen ) I / i ,- Oregon&California Lands(O&C Lands) i - 1 pro', {- I I \ I Coos Bay Wagon Road(CBWR) NONE �z•_ +--- —`-+---+; _ _�—,+— — ,;.-�_�—i National Forest . . . . 11L i ` •NationalGrasslands . . . . . . . , NONE 1 / -• ` _ At����� ' 7 —-h i ° �" HN3AN C National Parks and Monuments. I ( �~ n` ' •fr:^{Y ` �f t; ��- / L. '\ j ..i. . —? I'ARK �, �� j I Indian Lands or Reservations ', /r/ ) I ( /` .MR Sri 2 r Military Reservations and Withdrawals / - , t `' ' po ,• ' i —e 1Corps of Engineers /� „I _..u�;; f,_.- •S , .+ Wildlife Refuges. NONE `'_..,te . r I i - i y ' r_ v[(( I V V 4 Bankhead Jones Land Use Lands J ' -...--.1-- cc lL U Lands) NONE , al Tennessee Valley Authority NONE - -% --o _'. S' _-_ ; ` — . Canto Patented Lands . . . . . . . . . - - ' - ' •Apache Junction -- - boa State Lands . -t - c - - _Palm Springs i -= co --- �_ Water and Power Resources Service . ._ �' __i__. � ' Power Withdrawals and % L • i —'- r Classifications 7 �I ..- - I. Federal Agency Protective -- - --- _-— Withdrawals - s r, Public Water Reserves NONE • ,' J -- I -,j• (DOE).Department of Energy [NONE % I i a 1lf ' 1 6 `1� I t Oregon&California Lands lO&C -- ,4 t ~ Dinosaur 1 Lands Administered By US Forest �•r-- Mtn - NONE 1 \\\ / r 51 Radio&Air Facilities NONE - V /" Miscellaneous \ state. County.City.Wildlife. - " Park and Outdoor Recreation Areas ."- ., -\- . 1� 1 - /-Deslert t ✓ — Proving Grounds -` // i _ � �/ -_/ am ,. ' _ �� - '9� m Water Tan ' )7--•� AM5 t \ 38 31 , ---.... \_____ ----"—I N7/ \\_.... 2 Well• r 1 6\ _ _ - - a 600 45 R B E 30' (THEODORE ROOS: ,/ ,, lk , s G o/d f i e! HrLr\\ " I BUI /rk„ \ i I _ , C. // -7 _� 5) 36 j� 31 T V I lli I A _, e . aaz ., j / I '� 'l _ �} .f rr a , 1 `-- �`, I l if j�J'� } uf(d i e o 1,-V------ ..> -7. HMANt�S Ei-R-E:GAIS- --A- 3> :.< Oi J ,6 J ,! ; ! t -r� I% e� 1 '�"� 'ARK-�) Al L - Q-_Q'' , , ../ 1 I �X l . � l''.. .41..\: : S np:g_� i, 1 , ifi," ,----fr y /.I —1--- ,s^, \ --.A 1. 1"__,/F.''''' . ' 13 ] /f 1' •P say ri - 88 < a5' i _. _ ij Canyo ^. Apache Junction _--- ' ❑a i' . ; C j _ . _ - - __•_------- _ _. _ i _ - 1_. J Palm Springs _ }' y -- ----- . - _.. j L. _� 531 --i __ . / ,, J //r 1 r/ ,r- I F� —I �7— l �6� 31 /1 - -- I 3 ♦( 465 }} i .k� T 61 I : c — JTThJ 1� �� Dinosaur i ;( —'f !' {— l,.\�` �\ — Mtn �t r —J t .47 J/'' - \ 575 i /4,- --rj--\71— I-- . — ../. __.---, . C _--4 loo\ ,__.?„,..„._,--,-----, Proving Grounds _ r - 1= _ \-1 466 �_ ��' Ater Tan ! /"_ ��i \. 485 —r— —�— — r 31 I _\� \ 36 31 46 \ I Well I 1 6 �" 1 6 4 [ Apt" Junclwn City lnnllr r`'r ICJ •**w*###ww*ww+#w+##*+++#*#*##*w*+w*+#*#a++**+**+#.#*+ k �w*aa..... r-`-( SESlT9 Clay Worst ( 0 V INVESTMENT CORP. President REALTOit SI 51 1 E '0 J W Windsong Si u c ¢ m u v `w W.Foothill S1. ¢ E_ Farnll iil St z ¢ (602) 982-1951 0 v o o 2 ¢ s c a Res. 982 2671 Fuur PvaMv£lamanury SU;oul 2 F E gi 0 ¢ 2 Z Suite No.1 P.O Box 788 St I E Z Tepee SI Parkway Professional Plaza Apache Junction,Arizona w Rawhide . _ • N . u ShlplOCh SI : : Mn7Zanlia St y �MHP U0 0 ¢ 3 E Man;pnlla at y ii r r n m a z 3 W. tHQypn up St. E Roundup c ¢ r S 4 1W grMocklr.iL rJO p �^ Apoch• Junction City Hall - Sr S q v Jb Z o EsccndldoCl ^-��Itp s o re ` u Z c W Greesr..nrvn" St W. I Mlle _ v' mm 0 i r M11P � ,,,e,iv; o,,,i JI J 6,e•Ine vv00d 5 Greasewood o c aeup a itIMP ® u City Poh v Z v -E. z Z W Z Superstition '- z Blvd -_ E S�esla SI ¢ w Gnolie SI o v ¢ o .*w 6 m q f W. Ohl() St. 0 , ›, c S persl on r ¢ ¢ utP I Io Cody St = a, rn °' c' o a I cr i I Guuy SI c W tr l 0 v p Ti ~ I• c � m c m 1 > Vlrgil�a SI ! E 3 '0 z Ju SI rR w 0 I. alt. V,J Virginia St 8 O ,a E ._, "_� '' a C.aclul o Y1 Scentr St ,� O. z I Scenic Dr ¢ a t ,°- Sc ink_ z jl, z Z ■f '-- c Wren St. W.Balmer c POST OFFICE , i7�1, a v z • a E Cactus Wren St ',1P .1 z W Z Greoory St Cl Z z ¢ St. 1 0 HP SIERIFF• I Chombar c MMP z 1 ii! FIRE r„APT z W Roosevelt �, �' of u z z z - amarlSk St Commaru z Z � � E Junction Dr rrs qs i Apache F i ail k �( 5- 50 r LIBRARY �, v ¢I Sscor14 Avt. ¢ IT - MHP E se,-on,f A. W nc1 i t cl 1�ve to e,p, ----- U o m 7 c 0 0 - M,I ~Qf j Al 9Ave E 0 ` I U m ml ' `d T= ¢ S 0 1 0 Fu i t A `' o °i i E 'iv) Fnunh ¢ cvd owns A e O a a 01 p cli _ zi Il[I�Yr C O D 'Sr 1 re 11 MMF j. I .'' 3 m f '4luunfau m C7 U W Sixth A;n—•y1 r --+ (_ Si.tn Ave q o ] c_ 3 0 ry0' ' Seventh Ai u..� d Q . Z _ 0 a N _1 N o;� M MY ;� N 1• • N_ N_ _ c'rlinJ V1 s0J ,--.__.- _-._"t^ .i VI MRY w ^" O w ri nrh pyy,Sri ool Broadway Ave ✓ _ n E B c al r _ u7 MHPF ¢ E NlnlllAvn �`•• a r-- w lr' __IOU),Ay N O r Tenth 3 , 0 E Tenth cr AveAvu al Q u 0 0. c o E Desert •12 Avu 0 i C W 121,1 ve 3 b�_. ,'n 12th Ave '— 2� o E. u 12th Ave U '• , O ells Fargo Ave EOloven¢ Ave I131h) 0 i _ c n a W 13 jiA'se o v Avu ;° °r E 17SII, tr s (r N 0 E 0 t Av (141n) Cr) Ave B v = G .17 — W.-L7.iL Ave E Friar Ave„aria (151 n) SZ e y `n c"•- W Palomino Ave .YL 1:lit Ave Ii ,,,1,50.. t';JtvOo Ave i(toln) /////Q v E Rim a .n u7 IM ->Y 1@in _ AVE, E e t v ' E �v e 161h Ave vV h c Ave x E 171n Ave y !Q_'✓'J N W 17U� Ave E Kac'.hlna`n , L. S o p '1 ltllhI----�—+a - c I1 oF l Inch O Ave (1`JII I n II♦jl ) EL' n o v E hies ntn IA !�■ � Vp m ' a m 9' E 19uI AverJ [.. _� o W 191h 400,yt, �a r c Ave {191h! v _, a d A ° '—E 191h Ln a E MUl�lbhl!IIJ fi A c O N V o ¢ _' 9 20. rani' ` Z IS.—"A o 4 V1 I U N _Pitt Ave 2 E Naval() Avn ;a E 3 a Ave ¢ i > c o ¢ v F[[:y1� N N W u �tst_�/ Li/ I- '1•:i Pvu - ¢ F 'y w w `'+;ud J?.vu 122nd) E Pelrperllnb Aye ry S E 9 ¢ ` �.;... . Ave y o --- --_. J E Uuml Ave ,a r� �, ` ~Z vi m W I*, 'YfitAvl, (23rd) ° 1 t ,i t %lnl Au > i YI SoLLllfuw Ave 'n a r 0 E i. .n 1' I o t uI '- IL `' /� I 1 HI'ALIIL JUIJI, I IUiv I L 1.1 .J 1.1 _ -- !) G G •�1 # i I ul I- 4 UI 0 tL �p2 '1 NI0L3 1(. HOME 1E I'AI1I\ Q/ BAYIS �/ \ �• r•�1� ~� V I Q (LC' 4 Z �4.2...14 —. 7 Y I . 1 I : ,., IJ t L 4 I1.1 n 1 •, e i ,.1 0 1 . 1 "• It IlJ ' C] J u1 WF. �l.J W O ��r 0• 1±± ftLJ lr U .I .� ,, • tj I PL / 1 t t Cr Y u~ _ W W m a a a — to c . in I-iw 6 0 - � 0 - 6 9 _roi-4 0 20 f \ ( 'I ' PWll 20 �i.• II�t ..II)lUt1 5 SA4805 -,RS T 1 T ION \ C 8 —2 I I `Iv` I I II7 TATIUN i Xr0 1U ►^t'..° Va , fawn a_• •'.ram w Lo GRn a, I,oz4I I .._. ._ `_ CcaeOit.....t1 PLAZA EAST �' I G �•: t� �U P C N S'f I T I Ofl �—y.�_ I \ J) 14j4C 1 , PLAZA ITA 4uu.� I 2AI 2.d I ` � W LANK � . �..., I I I d W `, W 4 , / I I!1 lY ,S1_LO-_ _IL)- N. • 1 , 'li • I : i. • ,r1 /— i �e zl - 1 _ D ��t �' r r - SIERRA EN 1 R �, 4. •.. / / II 1 " � z SUBDIVISION • Its � f111� I _ I _ I _ �.1 J // / .- - - — ' cn - J I 1 - CR - 5 = 0 z 1 1 G . . I q L (,, Wit_ A POR1 ION OF THE S j. SEC 20 T1 N RBE P I NAL CO AR I ZONA I I SCALE : 1 IN. _ )100 FT. Aa I I i PU . , I I \-1 - - - ( - - - _ �c�iu z� — - — I,1�, _ . -- I, ,' .F PUBLIC HEARING ON APACHE JUNCTION GENERAL PLAN January 20, 1982 Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: ' My name is Clay Worst, P.C. Box 788, Apache Junction. I am a real estate broker representing Clara Carney, owner of the Parcel indicated in red on the map provided, bounded on the north by the Apache Trail. the west by Azure Skies, the south by Broadway, and the east by Sierra Entrada, Apache Ho, and the Superstition Plaza shopping center. The 46 acres west and south of Apache Ho is zoned CR-5 multi- family residential. Your General Plan is the most valuable planning tool I have seen, and your people are to be congratulated. However. I see one inconsistency. The area outlined in green comprises Sections 19 and 20, the most densely developed sections of town, containing 82% of all existing commercial development in the city. The highest concentration of mobile home and trailer parks lie in these tNo :actions. These sections have many multi-family dwellings. Of the high density residential patterns within the city, the three largest all lie in this area. The only large residential tract left unsubdivided in these sections is Mrs. Carney's property. Now, despite the fact that there is no existing low density residential development anywhere in Sections 19 or 20 south of the Apache Trail, and an insignificant amount to the north, our Land Use Yap proposes low density housing for my client's Property. Comprehensive planning calls for meaningful transition between adjacent zones. When you propose low density housing -- presumably 1 family per acre -- immediately adjacent to the Superstition Plaza shopping center, you cross directly over 11 intermediate zoning class- ifications. I submit that this is not meaningful transition. Statistically, there are only two worse transitions possible, viz. to light or heavy industrial. I submit that the Proposed land use for my client's property is inappropriate in that it fails to recognize existing development patterns. and in fact creates a major conflict in land use. The land in question was zoned CR-5 multi-family by Pinal County many years ago. You have classified the Environmental Limits to Development as "slight", your best classification. It is not a flood-prone area. There is no known subsidence. The proximity to shopping is unequalled. There is nothing to preclude development into urban-type uses. I'd like to examine the implications of the low-density class- ification. and the manner in which it came to be proposed. This classification calls for a population density range of between 0 and 7 persons per acre, but further refines this by alloting the presumed available groundwater to the study area plus Mesa del Oro. This reduces the allowable population density of Mrs. Carnev's land to 2.46 persons per acre, or one dwelling unit Per acre. 2 Elsewhere. the plan recommends allowing the keening of horses on r f 1-acre minimum parcels. Clearly, the 1-acre minimum lot size is a rural, not an urban, classification, and fails to adhere to the Plan's own admonition that "Development of the city's land use plan and subsequent land use controls to implement that plan must be done with cognizance of present land use patterns..." Mrs. Carney and I realize that this classification on a Land Use Map, in itself, does not change the existing CR-5 zoning. Only a change in the Zoning Map can do this. -- - However, we are alarmed. Our concerns are these. 1. The proposed Land Use Map is by definition a predictive land use tool. It is to uredict how this land shall be used. 2. Our present Zoning Ordinance and Map is essentially the old Pinal County Ordinance and Map, with classifications poorly suited to the city's needs, admittedly adopted only as an interim measure. 3. The General Plan states that upon adoption of the Plan the city should instruct the Planning and Zoning Commission to review the entire Zoning Ordinance and Map, and recommend changes, by implication to bring the zoning into conformity with the Land Use Map. ;4.* . ;r , ;,,; 4. Your plan states that "...the burden of proof is upon the applicant to present facts enough to warrant permission for different land uses than what appear on the Land Use Map". 5. Under your proposed uses, this parcel will be rendered impossible of development except through legal subdivision, and. in your own words, "such subdivision cannot occur until the Groundwater Legislation and availability of water is resolved". Since this moratorium is still in effect, you will have rendered Mrs. Carney's land undevelopable. 6. The General Plan states. "Except in a few isolated instances, it can be assumed that the existing residential density patterns it the city and study area cannot be changed to effect an actual reduction in density", yet the Land Use Map proposes just that. Now, what motivated this change, and what are the alternatives? The classification was arrived at by adherance to mathematical formulae. It was based on the presumption of furnishing, from our existing groundwater supply, enough water to develop some 13,000 acres of dnsert land in the outlying study area, most of which is in government ownership. To hold in reserve enough water to someday develop these outlying lands, lands in the city proper cannot be developed to their highest and best use. We question this rationale for several reasons. Projects are underway to resolve the potential water shortage. The Arizona Land Department already has a tentative CAP allotment to serve state lands. The Mammoth Mine at Goldfield is being studied as a possible water supply. At the 1,100 ft. level, the mine struck an underground stream that flooded the entire working in a matter of minutes, and which two 6-inch steam pumps couldn't lower. Use of mine water for domestic purposes is not unusual. The municipal water supply at Superior is mine water. ,ba"l1A(,0. i,t'la°T,04i=.-rci'�94 /Mhk 3 However, water conservation is not the only issue. The conservation of land may be of greater importance. In America, the amount of agricultural land being converted to urban development is frightening. A diversion of residential housing to desert areas conserves farm lands, and high density housing is the greatest conservator of land.Indeed, someday, for most people, there will be no other kind. I submit that it would be better conservation to allot each parcel of land, as it is developed, sufficient groundwater to be developed - - to its highest and best use. and when development reaches the maximum that can be maintained with the then existing water supplies, that the remaining lands, presumably government owned. be left for recreational and open space uses until such time as • technology produces alternative sources of water. Now if strict adherance to these groundwater formulae is a legal requirement, it would appear that a high density residential classification might be retained downtown by reclassifying a corresponding outlying tract for non-use. A large part of Goldfield is an operating mine, though not so indicated on your map. It not only is a non-user. its major problem is groundwater flooding at the 55 ft. level, which water is being pumped and wasted. If the water allotment is transferred from these properties to the city, the balance could be favorable. They certainly don't want it. Finally, the bare land value of Mrs. Carney's property. with its present uses, is at least 31.5 Million. However, if the permitted uses are brought into conformity with your plan, I would estimate its value at about $1 Million, as loss of 0-Million to my client. Some of you may remember Mrs. Carney. She and Frank came here in 1948. Mrs. Carney is a widow, elderly, and legally blind. She has lived for years off the income from the sale of other lands. This income is running out. This land is her last remaining large asset , which she has held against a time of need. Mrs. Carney has made application for admission to a sheltered care facility in Tempe. She is dependent upon the sale of this property to accomplish this. I have a buyer for the property at the price mentioned. A rep- resentative of the buyer, why is himself a past chairman of the i+taricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission. has met with your __ Planning Director and myself. The buyer advised me that if the city gives any indication of intent to reduce the permitted density of this parcel to a low density classification, that he will consider it impossible of feasible development and will relocate his project in East Mesa. This would suffer Mrs. Carney a loss of about 0 -Million, cause the loss of a valuable development and a multi-million dollar increased commercial tax base to the city, when developed. I propose that it is in the city's best interest to amend the Land Use Map to change the classification of Mrs. Carney's property to High Density Residential, in conformity with its present CR-5 zoning, in harmony with surrounding development. and that the State Land Department be left with the problem. if indeed it be a problem, of how to someday supply water to the undeveloped desert south of the court:, (lump. Thank you. 1/. Anibk /;/// LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS : That I , Clara M. Carney, am the owner of record of the following ,.` described real property situate in Pinal County, State of Arizona , to wit: Pinal County Tax Parcel No. 101-16-001 Pinal County Tax Parcel No. 101-16-003 All located in Section 20, T.1 N. , R. 8 E. , G.& S .R.B .& M. And that I by these presents do make and appoint Clay Worst , with address at Apache Junction, Arizona , my lawful attorney, in my name and stead, to use and take all lawful means and ways to transact for any and all matters involving zoning classification land use classification, and other matters pertaining to permitted land uses on the above lands. Witness my hand this 20th day of January, 1982. Clara M. Car ey State of ARIZONA) ) ss . County of Pinal ) �.� On this 20th dayof January, 1982, before me , Ruth Ann Armsby Notary Public , personally appeared Clara M . Carney, to me well known, who subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same. In witness whereof I set my hand and official seal. Notary Public My commission expires: LS My Commission Expires January 25, 1985 Amok January 20, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Commission Members. Since the City of Apache Junction is currently formulating a master plan for the city and surrounding areas[known as the Zone of Influence], citi- zens residing in the Zone of Influence areas do hereby wish to make the following statements and recommendations pertaining to residential por- tions of Area I on the Land Use Map: The Sewage Disposal Alternatives section of the General Plan recommends 1] The low density outlying area should remain such with one acre minimum district which would allow continued use of individual on-site systems [3-1] The Water Systems Analysis section of the General Plan recommends 2] With regard to land development, the pace of development in the interim should be at a low density pace except for - previous zoning decisions and as clarified in the land use _.:�► .` � ...., �. element. [4-5] Furthermore, a recommendation for land use in the General Plan is as fol- lows: This city and area have developed a western lifestyle that many of the residents desire to retain. Those wishes, in as far as prac- tical , should be honored With natural constraints such as soil limitations and slopes, such area should be maintained in low den- sity residential. [2-53] Citizens residing in the Zone of Influence areas of the City of Apache Junction respectfully request that you approve the residential land-use recommendations for those areas, as outlined above We believe that our request for one-acre minimum lot size is consistent with the General Plan, /mak, and we encourage you to vote for its acceptance R spectfully, Fred W Wurst Section 25 Jo -Morva/k Section?24 Mrs. Howard Fulle Sec on 23 oy Ree er Se ti 13 Id Umla Section 12 bert Nu Section 4 . " ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF 45 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : 11> YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSh?ITN V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON V/ VICE MAYOR HILL V MAYOR CLARKE V UNANI"^.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL BE IT RESOLVED DY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTS THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION : 2001; APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN" AS THE COMPLETE REPORT IN FULFILLMENT OF THE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION WITH THE FOUR CORNERS REGIONAL COMMISSION, CONTRACT FCRC NO , 101--811-082-2 , THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE REPORT AS COMPLETE DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY AGREEMENT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION CONTAINED THEREIN . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER IS AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO PERFORM THOSE TASK NECESSARY TO MAKE A FINAL REPORT TO THE FOUR CORNERS REGIONAL COMMISSION IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SAID GRANT. ..: •.- .. ... vx .... •••\O}AP.:..n. ,f.s., .+.n • OPTION No , 1 (RETURN TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PRIOR TO ADOPTION) ITEM NO . 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-01 INCLUDING THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AND ALL ATTACHMENTS ARE HEREBY REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WITH DIRECTION TO HOLD ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING AND TO REVIEW ITS RECOMMENDATION AND TO REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ITS RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING RECONSIDERATION , /g\ ...awi+.MrH•Mlxr41>.-r:.u.<`Ynf,.r.'+s:+af�s.V:.Y.Y.,:r .,i.. .; ..,o..s,."::ne4.,.•-;:. ::":-, . .,r,N,»... . ._ ... .-,.. -:N:7.+...... - - .• OPTION No . 2 (To TABLE) ITEM NO . 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THIS PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY TABLED TO AT 7: 00 P.M. AT THIS SAME LOCATION . uiz� Y J . k • • • 110 • • • 1 • era' WA =rn x ? - r4 r? .ttky ad 1 4�P OPTION No. 3 (AMEND) ITEM NO. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED BE AND HEREBY IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS : OPTION No , 4 (TO ADOPT) ITEM NO , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 82-01, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, ADOPTING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION : 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, " WHICH INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, A LAND USE ELEMENT, SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES, WATER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, A CIRCULATION (TRANSPORTATION ) PLAN, AND A SECTION 16 MASTER PLAN; AND ACCEPTS AS REFERENCE THE REPORTS "A TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " "WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " "SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; AND ADOPTS AS PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN THE DOCUMENTS ENTITLED "POPULATION ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " AND "CITY COMPLEX PLANNING PROGRAM, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " BE AND HEREBY IS, ADOPTED , " PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 94, THE APPLICANT IS PALM-SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BY COMMISSION INITIATIVE 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC ON THIS PETITION , 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME, 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED PQACHE✓ U IL , k+ Z \\\........... '9PizoNP cOit y o C4pache 092LnctZon January 7, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER 1',) � FROM: S, JOE GERO, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - PALM SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION REZONING PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING - FEBRUARY 2, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION - FEBRUARY 16, 1982 General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 94 Rezoning Case No. PZ-4-81 Rezoning Request: CR-3 to CR-3/PD and CR-5 to CR-5/PD Applicant: Palm Springs Homeowners Association (by Commission Initiative) Date of Application: February 3, 1981 ... Date of Advertisement- November 22, 1981 (P&Z) January 17, 1982 (City Council ) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: December 8, 1981 and January 6, 1982 Area: Palm Springs Sections 2, 3, 4, and 7 A total of 322 notices were mailed to property owners within the area to be rezoned and within 300 feet thereof. Approver for Agenda D . Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) � � First Rc,- .g _.. �2/ Ham # V ..- Fire Department - No comments Second l:b;=+'ing Director of Public Works - No comments ✓public Hearing Zoning Administrator - . Old Business Comments: New Business This is a proposed rezoning in which those areas which are CR-3 would 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - PALM SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION REZONING January 7, 1982 Page Two become CR-3/PD and those areas which are CR-5 would become CR-5/PD. Generally, the Association proposes to have the subdivision covenants enacted as part of the zoning ordinance. Specific district require- ments would be contained in the ordinance. In that this proposal covers an area that has been subdivided for a number of years and is generally developed, a number of the Article 33 requirements appear to be inappropriate. Therefore, the proposed ordinance provides for varying the documentation required. Since no follow-up by construction will be required, both preliminary and first step approval is contemplated by process. Attachments: 1 . Random sample by Homeowners Association of square footage of homes in the area to be rezoned. 2. Two letters from the Palm Springs Homeowners Association. 3. Map and proposed ordinance. 4. Information from Homeowners Association NOTE: Please remember that in your statement of reasons, the ordinance requires finding that the application is in compliance with Section 33.09. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: At the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 6, 1982, the following motion was approved (5-0-2) . "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-4-81 , also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 94, application of Palm Springs Homeowners Association for property described as Units 2, 3, 4, and 7, Palm Springs Subdivision, the legal description being a matter of public record, requesting rezoning from CR-3 Single Residence Zone and CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone to CR-3/PD Single Residence Zone by Planned Development and CR-5/PD Multiple Residence Zone by Planned Development according to the attached map, and finds the proposed rezoning is in compliance with Section 33.09 of the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Ordinance; therefore the Commission recom- mends approval of said application. The reasons for the recommenda- tion are: 1 . This ordinance provides updated and enforceable zoning restrictions ORDINANCE NO 94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFI- CATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-4-81 FOR THOSE CERTAIN AREAS DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM CR-3 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CR-3/PD SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR THOSE CERTAIN AREAS DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, ESTABLISHING ZONING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CERTAIN AREAS ZONED; PROVIDING FOR VARIANCE IN THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 33 WITH REGARD TO DOCUMENTATION, STANDARDS, AND PROCEDURES REQUIRED, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, _ PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL 1. The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the property described as Lots No 301 through 415 of Unit 2 of the Palm Springs Subdivision now in the city of Apache Junction, county of Pinal , state of Arizona, as per maps recorded in Map Book 8, Page 3, in the office of the County Recorder of Pinal County, Florence, Arizona, .a: ,.. .. Lots No. 416 through 450 and Tract B of Unit 3 of the Palm Springs Subdivision now in the city of Apache Junction, county of Pinal, state of Arizona, as per maps recorded in Map Book 8, Page 33, in the office of the County Recorder of Pinal ` County, Florence, Arizona; 1 Lots No 451 through 454 of Unit 4 of the Palm Springs tSubdivision now in the city of Apache Junction, county of Pinal, state of Arizona, as per maps recorded in Map Book 9, Page 38, in the office of the County Recorder of Pinal County, Florence, Arizona, Lots No. 6 through 16, 27 through 32, 45 through 68 of Unit 7 of the Palm Springs Subdivision now in the city of Apache Junction, county of Pinal, state of Arizona, as per maps re- corded in Map Book 13, Page 51, in the office of the County Recorder of Pinal County, Florence, Arizona, be and hereby is changed from CR-3 Single Residence Zone to CR-3/PD Single Residence Zone by Planned Development 2 The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the property described as • Lots No 1 through 5, 17 through 26, 33 through 44 of Unit 7 --_-- --- of the Palm Springs Subdivision now in the city of Apache Junction, county of Pinal , state of Arizona, as per maps re- corded in Map Book 13, Page 51, in the office of the County Recorder of Pinal County, Florence, Arizona, be and hereby is changed from CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone to CR-5/PD Multiple Residence Zone by Planned Development 3 The requirements and provisions set forth by this ordinance shall supple- ment those requirements and provisions as set forth in the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Ordinance to the extent provisions and requirements herein conflicting provisions other in the Zoning Ordinance, these provisions shall prevail. Ordinance No. 94 Page Two of Five 4. The documentation required by Section 33.04 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be waived as per Section 33 10 1(b) 5. In that the area is an existing subdivision previously approved by Pinal County, Arizona, the "Development Standards" as set forth in Section 33.05 are waived, EXCEPT as may be otherwise provided herein 6. As per Section 33.07.3, the City Council does hereby waive the underground utility requirement to the degree that any new construction in areas al- ready served by overhead utilities may continue to be so served However, ---•---- future utilities where there are no overhead utilities shall be placed underground. SECTION II GENERAL REGULATIONS 1. Applicability a These provisions shall apply to all lots in these planned development zoning district areas 2. Types of Structures All structures on the lots in this planned development area shall be of new construction and no buildings shall be moved from any other location onto any of these lots Modular and pre-fabricated buildings shall not . _ be erected on these lots 3. Maximum Building Height One story or seventeen feet, whichever is less 4. Fences and Hedges No wall, fence, or hedge over three (3) feet in height shall be constructed 9 9 or maintained from the front street line for a distance at least equal to the front yard setback area. For those lots on which residential structures exist or are under construction at the time of adoption of this ordinance, no wall, fence, or hedge over three (3) feet in height shall be constructed or maintained nearer to the front street line than the front walls of the building erected on such lot or the front yard setback, whichever is less 5 Subdivision of Lots None of these lots covered by this ordinance shall be resubdivided into smaller lots nor conveyed in less than the full original dimension of such lots as shown on the recorded plats of such lots 6 Exterior Building Lighting No lighting fixtures will be erected at a height greater than two (2) feet below the peak building roof line. All exterior lights shall be shielded and directed in a manner so as to illuminate the owner's building and yard. 7. Accessory Buildings a. No accessory building shall be constructed upon a lot until the construction of the main building has commenced b. Accessory buildings shall not exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet. 8. Parking Requirements In addition to the parking requirements of Article XXI of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Ordinance, the following shall apply .yam Ordinance No 94 Page Three of Five a No commercial vehicles over one (1) ton, or self-contained slide-on campers shall be parked overnight in any front yard. A motor home or travel trailer may be parked in a front yard on paved driveways b For single family dwellings, the driveways and parking spaces shall be paved with either asphaltic concrete or cement. •OnN c For multiple family dwellings, the driveways and parking spaces shall • be paved with either asphaltic concrete or cement — — — SECTION III CR-3/PD SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS In addition to the requirements and provisions of Section I and Section II of this ordinance, the following shall apply to those areas in the CR-3/PD Single - Residence Zone by Planned Development: 1 Uses Permitted a. One single family dwelling per lot; or b Public Park, and c. Agriculture and horticulture, floral and vegetable gardening, nursery or greenhouse used only for propagation and culture, and not for retail sale, and `r- + , „ d. Home occupation conducted only from the main dwelling on the premises, provided the home occupation does not cover more than 25 percent of the dwelling area e. A trailer for not more than ninety (90) days during construction of a permitted use on the same premises, which period may be extended for an additional period of ninety (90) days by the Zoning Administrator upon written request of the applicant f. No livestock or poultry of any kind shall be kept on any of the lots in the Palm Springs Planned Development Area 2. Minimum Dwelling Livable Area No dwelling shall be constructed which contains less than the minimum square feet of livable floor area for those portions of Units 2, 3, 4, and 7 of the Palm Springs Subdivision zoned CR-3/PD Single Residence Zone by Planned Development as specified below. No part of a building either attached or not, that is used for a garage, carport, porch, or patio shall be counted in meeting the minimum floor area requirements PALM SPRINGS SUBDIVISION MINIMUM FLOOR AREA REQUIREMENTS Unit Number Area Requirements 2 1,600 square feet 3, 4, 7 1,200 square feet 3 Minimum Yard Requirements (in feet) Unit 2 Units 3 & 4 Unit 7 a. Front Yard 25 25 25 b Side Yards 10 10 7 Side Yards on a Corner Lot 18 18 18 (for that side yard adjacent to the street) c. Rear Yard 25 25 25 Rear Yard on a Corner Lot 10 10 10 Ordinance No. 94 Page Four of Five SECTION IV CR-5/PD MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS In addition to the provisions and requirements of Section I and Section II of this ordinance, the following shall apply to those portions of Unit 7 of the `Y •- Palm Springs Subdivision zoned CR-5/PD Multiple Residence Zone by Planned /\ Development 1. Uses Permitted a Single family dwelling; or b. Multiple family dwelling, or c Public park, and d Agriculture and horticulture, floral and vegetable gardening, nursery or greenhouse used only for propogation and culture and not for retail sale, and e Home occupation conducted only from the main dwelling on the premises, provided the home occupation does not cover more than 25 percent of the dwelling area. f A trailer for not more than ninety (90) days during construction of a permitted use on the same premises, which period may be extended for - an additional period of ninety (90) days by the Zoning Administrator upon written request of the applicant g No livestock or poultry of any kind shall be kept on any of the lots in the Palm Springs Planned Development Area. 2 Minimum Dwelling Livable Area No dwelling, exclusive of multiple family units, shall be constructed in that portion of Unit 7 of the Palm Springs Subdivision zoned CR-5/PD Multiple Residence Zone by Planned Development which contains less than 1,200 square feet of livable floor area. No part of a building, either attached or unattached, that is used for a garage, carport, porch, or patio shall be counted in meeting the minimum floor area requirements. Assi\ 3. One multiple family dwelling may be permitted per each 2,000 square feet of lot area 4 Minimum Yard Requirements (in feet) a Front Yard 25 b Side Yards 7 Side Yards on a Corner Lot. 18 (for that side yard adjacent to the street) c. Rear Yard 25 Rear Yard on a Corner Lot 10 SECTION V PRELIMINARY AND FINAL STAGE APPROVAL GRANTED The approval of this ordinance grants preliminary and final stage approval for the Planned Development in that no future improvements would be required as a condition precedent to final approval SECTION VI REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, are hereby re- . pealed .:,, . . Ignik .,.,., .,.7qp,,<::4.ce�';v.a-.vr!e:s�ey �.s-'G,,a Ordinance No. 94 Page Five of Five .1 SECTION VII PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference is, for any _�.... reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the valid- ity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION VIII PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1 ,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day - that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as herein- above described. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Mayor . • ATTEST .,.,.. , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ity t6 ey PZ-4-81 (COMMISSION INITIATIVE) l PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 94 • • 1 PROPOSED REZONING FROM • jLf._. CR-3 TO CR-3/PD AND FROM E DESERT 'VE. CR-5 TO CR-5/PD __________ _ _ , _ •.L. _ Eli _ sitsvimivig CR-3 occ _ W CR-3 cc MN w UJ■aT iiN:► z CR-5 _ '3 MI'.__ . MIMI El r'1 ..-....\CL CR-5 5- 1 s I• um OM l E HONDO AVE CR-3 [ \ I I r CR-3 UNIT 2 I 1 ► 1 AVE. I J � � I a 1 I a N `f) [- SCALE - 0 400 800 FEET r E� OSAGE AVE I /'N fr Random Sample square Footage — Houses — Palm Sorin2.s Subdivision (As of 8/28/80) This sample was obtained from the Final County Assessorts Report No. AC 621 ,. Unit 2 Parcel No. Sq. Ft. Liveable Parcel No. Sq. Ft. Liveable 1142 1232 255 240 254 1619 253 1610 166 1768 169 2019 172 1600 174 2 669 176 1568 177 1670 145 2089 1147 7 1604 200 1190 201 2503 2146 6 2107 202 11L06 203 1781 212 1616 213 1711 216 1532 134 1603 223 1616 230 1670 233 1549 235 1056 _ Unit 3 257 1316 261 1131 264 1390 270 75 275 1283 276 2116 283 1750 286 1271 290 1291 278 1270 281 21416 ,c /'\ Random Sample Square Footage, Houses - Palm Sorinns Sub±.vision (as of 8/28/80) This sample was ootained from the Final County Assessor's Report No. AC 62144E. Unit 4 Parcel Mo. Sq. Ft. Liveable Parcel No. Sq. Ft. Liveable 292 1306 294 1389 295 1264 Unit 7 31!1 1126 319 1726 323 930 337 1633 339 1264 369 i354 375 1334 372 1!406 367 1348 3714 1376 ?.T.. 3- - �; ,T; -?V f_T'1 'M R ' sf .:^eC-e J'I'^' _on, Q-inn - r _ r. i s ' re r nf7 t 7t .F. he " l^rr^t - _ aen �� revol r'rp n l� .. 1 'eJ�T a,5.. .. ..� ii� ''tt-C._c.� _. � _-_.,.. t-_ v ...�' �C_ lots Cn17.*1, fo the ?-^_lrr Tit" ._on be :^. C't:.-7: 111. part On the CL. K.' and 'onirE; Or iir1anoe a:, 2s pract'cable. It 1.'-, a^--rent that this is t1,n onlis rr3Ct _Cal r.-c y -'.e__ Cc.;: Ile made. Zc-• .Z n1 inrcrcea:_tee. -o- ,-.. _, n+ ee .1 n nn .]V,„ .1 r _ -Into .1i s t er -. ., _ZGC:. �=� •� "^I'll=tt• has O ,..J SL a -__= _. _rC - _ -letter a"' ; 'r -- :o t 1^a folio ' y '", fa t i r; .. _o __ .poi e ,i _ ... ..,.s i a. CTce in :l=s es t:iere ore t ro -retho-I' o :.:"'"a �.1 ,�nin- _r•-1 Ira" - .. 7?7 7.3 t: c^. 0^ or ''.r j -- .oa r of ar•, r•. -r'r 't your Cr+rr i... ,o i �i1 `"'1 :-1: �11L:� n en,� .. Mort:st �• -_ _or. .:`7"i ron:•'"•:L is tlot con' ='.''..c+'.-.1 `+raC: '- ..2.1 3.1.e aC - 'J wide .._S•"_ '_`.n of ronort vT .. "ir"'-.: P cle le --nlJ +„_..n.^.�_, ' "% ..!':ot hifal .,roan -n o' Ir _� rn-r o rr,e1 '�� ' co- I I .__r1 p':t._ 1 .nd s^_CC 1] z,crs. ! o to :LC a_ ._^ -, 'i'?ier t^eso -. _ .: :.'S, :o 51,, O° l' 1t":'ers Conso t to °stablian an: = r. ^t-,tn of 'ri r n •'a e ' , _ y e, ho- over t y^ ��}; O�. oho J'1^.:'t C-. . The 11.-7=b1 2. . '. in _ 1"'011 . , s .i • ,- ^'q j '.riaic 1 "?C or •1-shin a L'^'n" •• )c -r s or 1, t-tore: , .,r t ct 0 .. C.;rr. ^.t C. r ., c".l 'r ,ntc 1 :+t,i r`4. C_ i'r:'r -r-nl o o\+ Ji.r-_� -on;n4 ord:.^aces 'Till :e ^ - t_LIn ." _n rli r' ^ �r 1ri .i!on •..ssir sl_t; _ s-octcr;. t:a-ti. .. i%Vfr.::Lt''`"'. =r a l.^^.� C`:r t+, bin l l i.i'1; .i'to. n o: lr .r _�� 'o ' Ct r: 1 to 'or cc, their r cc-d 1. ;ram t• ,, r,f, , -e.i 'at t o loo: roan 1 o o s -e L::t,. _ co `t,: Ct^-' S "' _Jo- 3r -our '_ - i c' - is for -.ell:, i s r _ -c ). - to _ ,..: :�s.:e 'houses • • klad • • s• • 10 LSi..� t.Ci.• S_:.a;.ZO;; •Ov=:S•' S.aG1.z-OOL1O1-s `C,� •1" ,.n_._ • .ono 24 lVu Gv`4L uT c,zu1':µ O; dege C: ` cl�. �.L •i�� �.~..: .:.i %.a itl; f.a..`ln:.a..''`'`O S^' `:L ."� 5=� ti`�, 1:T'',-T O'.7,T O ci_'G. .iw t �.::� ;LAG J.Z ;'€ t t v%iu Tuv:: O 7 :O)17 Sr� J_-�TLI.-.r^.«Z ZA�' .�',J L{:r oo p `v, cz cI.AC.i 4 `i_.A C: 0 6 c17.,a e.:Ok: % r4w i':v c_ic'[ ay rr-356—a2 azia Jo r^di: ci'i? U: li-[J:;.=u:z E.:10 C7:7-1 LLlaO .1 r•i. CJci ,;o LldWo .zoj�.id !T`� ca[i.�. "i� LV[�w J.,.:J�..1.....,...0 cJ�l� •G Z �� — 17711: ..'.0L r'U «L1iU` .:C T .c3c PAIN SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. APACHE JCT., ARIZONA February 3, 1981 City of Apache Junction Planning Department Apache Jct., Arizona 85220 Attn: Mr. J. Gero Dear Mr. Gero: With reference to the Palm Springs Planned Residental Development, please note the following changes: 1. Sect. B These restrictions apply to all single family dwellings and multiple dwelling lots in Sections 2, 3, 4 and 7 Palm Springs development according to the plat of record in the office of Pinal County, Arizona in Books 13 and 14. 16. Sect.B Dwellings Single family dwellings and townhouses shall provide two (2) parking spaces for each dwelling unit; multiple dwellings shall provide parking spaces as indicated in Article 21 of the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance. The front yard set- back area WILL NOT be used for parking of vehicles. .► Sect. C For single family dwellings the approaches and driveways will be paved with cement. For townhouses and multiple dwellings the approaches and driveways will be either asphalt or paved with cement. Under Specifics - Palm Springs Unit 7 See Art. 13 25 8 35 Zoned PRD Multiple -Apache Jct. or on a ccrner lot Res. Zoning Ord. 18 10 Please initiate the above changes in our Planned Residental Development for ' the Palm Springs area. Thank you. Sincerely, \ John•Schmidt, President /pb Palm Springs Homeowners Assoc. ) ) 1 t 1 4.. t) a) •.; l•- P. ' 1 ) I ) L) \.) 4) I`) i-' •• • . 4 ) • 1 I ) • I, .✓ • ) ) • . . .) • .3 C' • a •a. .y 4), I.I 11) / 1 0 .3 a .i 4. ,. J ~ 'I 'i I r• ) ) 13 1-1 1 C) 1 an i 14. 'S .` • ,S • ., .i ' 1`' is • F; • h Cl •;? • •� l", ,i :r -I , • J 1 / • �� i c` 1 �� n • • • I LI ): .S () r'1 J i . ' ri • • , I-' 3 a_3 ,I •) () .., 1 ' I t-a. 3-L a' Cl ''3 O ;I. 1 ,I- .1 • i •1 (D ,S 1 ,. -• , (J (4 •1 S F• f". i : ;)' f) (D(31 O 1J • 1 a • O a) a i ) (') .. t I ':: ) I • I I• (f) 3 I- D . I 3 I a 1) `t 1 S t' J .. -I 1 6] � !-) th 1.) '1 !J '3 CD O , .. ';1 1 n V ) (% I 1 •') 1.3 N 'i 13. a.i , 1 ) I F I 1 .1 ) • ) ,. rS O c t •-• .. �� \.) •.. Sc . .) •) '.)'a '1 ,a. ,.) a-I 0 c 1 ,: (D ,.,. ,h .�. ,, Y 1 t I 'S 1 „ I O S I-, J ,j (0 1 J ,C I-J J F� ) ' 3 l I 1 y , :) r O A � )r) •) 3 a-) =, ' ..1- )• � F n C U t o ;'S •i <� -• ) •-i ) I I CD rD AI,, c-1 ( L% :Y C) a f(1) CD 1....1 N L. F) ,3 �•. •.., C+ IJ �rs C) to 1., • K '� • I- 'i C) ) :.., rJ 41 (� I-) a 0 .,s .3 1-) a'• 1 r i (l 3 ,S J i:a '• J .-.) (D 6i I) :3 . 1 (J _ 3 C J 3 J a S c� C) c+ C I Cal ) r^ (n •• 1J is• (3 3 ai O ) ,.. C; ,) c) J .) O •J (i '� j, i I '' (I) CI. '•S 1) Y (:-4 35, 1 • r a 7 , O i i (D 't1 ) .3 I ' , „ c3 •J ; iJ• O C) 1.-I 3 3 3 1 1 S J a s 'S 0 I' ) a ) C) ,.) rS 3 °'<i H r) O 1 0 0 O 'i F l c l• •') r.J () i� , I .) • I (, ) ) t,1 `' in `1 15 G:, F I I I ' 4) 1) .`. { _ • ) K () 1.1 I') 0 c 1- a ) ) I-1 1 J ) j ..) • .J (D 0 ,3 " 0 U ) D :D :3 . I r a (.3 ,-I W I-' I--) 3i • . 1. 'J 1 ) '% ,,,) .7 %, p 0 , '• I-, ) 1 '1 • :S f • I () 'r ) 1+ •3 .1 •1 • (:) ,1 ) � -1 .1 :D h 'v , C' N .1) . to J . J •i i i, to 1 I ?. IJ• 'i r '1 a as I-. 3 a O C•l �. • ;) ) 3 3 c)' (D :3 1+, _ tit: '3 K I ) ( 0 3 I 1 -` n I • I • 0 I--• r•• 1 • 1 t J '.3 IJ• i ' i 0 f) J i "a ,3 _a ) I.J •• in O' t 1 1 1 H ,i' H () I-J ) •... :)) • '.1 '''a f' , C.) ,1 (II � 1) 1-4 ' • - )L . a • i •,) L) 0 1-. ) a i) .S ] 1. • ,`) i ' 1 4;) a ) ) a> S I: ,h I_1 -) ) 0 •'a t) a 1 • • 'i I- I , •) 'i cD ,n i; CD ,3 3 a I l.,) 1) I O • •r r1• c1' • r, C) , 1 }L .) •j c a •7 l 1 l ) 1 r 4 a !'� .l ) ;.,' 11 0F.' co K ' I 1) c 0 7 r'• 1...,1..., r. 1 ) 1 1_1 a.. I.1r K a, a..i 3 ) r 3 44 .J :3 .a a') S IJ r• •• • '$ 4) �i '.. !.) ) I.. ) f) I 1 Cl) •,• ',If c r I$ ') 13 a a+ ID A 13 .n N I-J J tU D 1 i r ,.) c h ) I-• (i) :3 ri )• a. , a' •.. .J (D .1 U c'h i'1 i-' •-/ t+ O '3 / .r '.S 0CD 5, ID '-; ,' D) .3 a' ') c) 1-J r O r,) c1- , CCD �;, i : Su 1 G sa O '. r+ c+ a y o ,J c!• (D 0 l) -., •I 0 i (1 S •'a •.. 0 „,a, 1.J a4 I ;1 (D I-) 3 I-J O V I I) O O 1,) 1`..) (: H-J 1 I V') - 1 I la U ( C) I .)• o 'c' :i a o • ,, 1) 9 ai Ci tJ• IJ 1_1 • .s ,. CI .1 I.)• ai ' 1• ' ,1 3 a : O I Cl H 1+ •1 J J' I ' t-' ID .-1fU )1 1 CD C') 1 1 ti 1 01 . �.i :.3 (D (4) 11 car 'n (4 a. •+ S .)' Ul l a ']' 1.'1 + 1.a .. J Co- '1 I-' 1% I .S I-' I-' ►i 0 1') ci 1-1 r) 1�• .1 4..".; I'• !J I.-10 I- :J 0 4. a.0 O ,• l) :.'.3. ,1 ca' a") c• 3 H a3 p f+ C) () •1 ai Cl) 'o c) 'i 1. a I 1:. (n c I• r) ) ' 14 4,• c* (0 U I-I O ') aD • I I •S U (D S' c. 1.-.) .3 'i :j $ I' (D r (0 .S il 11 --1 C,• (J 1 VI I. .h 1) ) tl • ) 3 ,J • �... 1 ,1 I-, I.) (I ' 1 , I 1--' •) i • I-a Li 1 I-• .1 I 1 ') ! / t7 ..) ;` ) :)1 1 1 I-' ') 3 -I el • • • • • ) C• _ I 1 I 1 • I...) ') I !J � fv.) 1 ,-, U , .-; •.- r' I' 1 C) J C:1 O C.1 1 'Ci 3 -_ •I , 1 I-I • • r 'i ) 3 '; '1 it () I' I-I ) I 'i ,) .;�.1 • • ,.� 3 ;-1 0 ) J J .1 .f i I-,. 'i O ,•I- 1 'y )i " 13 ' 1 '1 I ' a' - r -)• ,i ,-i I1 3 0 • Cl> 1< r 1 .) 1) I 1 '1 11 •3 t' '-) , •' .' .' 1 ... ' t; 1 'D -, 0 .i 'i '.3 .1) ;i O •' , '- 'i t 1 ii rl- ri , 1 --1 -i 1 r. ;.) ::) C' S i 1 • 1 ' •• 'D 0 Cl Ii C) ('I r:1 C. C> • a l to J ,.:. ) a .• •1 I'a O 1 ,I- i 1 1., 1 C I- C:1 u 1 ,.. 'i ) 3 (.) - fi j 1-' O + • t+ '-S �J I . r3. I-' I I'• •- I-J 1•`• `. ) 1` O r) O 1... 1; I ) '-' c, 0 j_. ..1 'a i'• ... ) '• 1 ) I-.' () ;-3 J .i ,1'. (i) 1 C) ••J • ‘ r, <h •I ) .S J it 0 -y '- C) .D Ci' 1.) r,' .• 0 .-`y )' I. 1.., .. yJ. .) .. C) -• ) ti . • > I :1 0 .13 :) `1. .. Cc' t.' •: (1 S - -i c..y F-' I-,. I a 1 :.L CD I ••• .) 1 I I- J ;3 ... I.J 3.. 1 ,) I .1 I J -. ,• I ' 1 • •' ) •` I 1'a '-3 .. -. <2 C)` ....... 1 J ;"1 , a ,3 .3 J 1_J r I.J 'I ':a 7.-1 +...• U) I,'' ri ) .3 y ' •3 -) •I J _I i..,. ..i IJ• `1 •3 r+ -.3 1 1I. ) * F • I-J N O •i - IS (D •3 1-1 c) , o F-i .. ;; , 1-I I ' ) 3 U ' (1- r-1 ..1 ) c+ 1„ :3 =s r'• i -h •J 1 1-/ I () '_; 0 O ct '1 H. CI (1I '.f .. ,.1 -' 1 . .) C) :.1 '1 r 1 O •I a a • O '3 1 ;-i O :') :D 1- 1 •I ,U• C) .) 1 y I •• 'i • 1:'_1 '3 1 a II) 05-' )i ) D 'i CD C ) r) .) i. 'i :f) O :1 ly IJ "3 Gl 3 I. 1 1' 3 )-• I i -1 I-41 . . C) ii r., 1 1 -- iJ •' '1 , 1 I ) •.3 I ti ) ). •� re •, �_� Si. i (J ' , ' •-• 1 1 ') I.I y ` '^i Gt .) cI' 1 ;S C'I' 0 I.• () La; ; '.3 c 4 .. t •f Q t 1 ,-3' `•; . �i ' '3 `•. r' T O ''D O '-S I-). 1- S1 • ... ') J• (1 1 ) ,'. v J I 'a '-, i. S 'J ill '$ .-•5 I - I .a •') • (.. ••I e al C.) I,. ,..1.. IA .1 ,I .) I' l ♦ I i.J I.J. ) O r I- ,j •1 '. () •'• rI ;1. C) i i .,1 •) ,.1 I ... IJ - =1 ..3 U I-; 1-J , _ ,a ti I-' •, 1 1 I'• rh ,r, r t) Cl) c O i..) l1) I ►- :3 J 1 1 (I' O cf. )h 3 I i 1 33 • I ' •1i '1 �� c, t ,-J fJ ') C) .1 ''i I. �• `D i I i• > .i 1 a • . I t • .) F: �_• 1 'f .. ' • (i I-J C) rJ 0 ' . 11 3 4- -) ) . -1. I • c S I� •,� I.. ,3 I.... 1- •' ; 13 ,3 1 ' J `• ., l, 'J : .i ) UI • J 1: • i 'I ,1 • ;1 I J' . J C) J .• 'D 0 J 'Cl 1: (.) I I 3 L. I J I 13 l) ,1 �• O Id (1 ,. •Si 1 ' 1- .r 'y - + r.• • .) ,J 0 Su '•S O (1 .--, t I 1 J •) 3 0 ) CD 1.1 I-' r1 'i •1 • I • IS • ..) ) J ) ) 0 II' 1Il 1' IJ. . I•. 1 0 1 ': ) Q t j ) ) J 1 1 1 l) •I▪ a N • h Cn (D �)' `w •) .) •3 ,.• •') .. . a 1J (1) (, 'I j - •.1• ) ,.. 0 . ..• -' I' •'i '3 , I I'' •+ V 1 • i �) •D %. .I J .3. ..1 I.,• I.a ,•• 1 I ) ) I ..• 0 '. II •' ) CD )• 3 .f ' '.L I-. r II) O 1-' '9 i r' ) .- r r•• 3 f I .1 I ' . t 1• I I f 1- 1) r'' I (D 'i) (>' 1 1. I S , I.. •1 i F., ,i • •I- .. f •, 1-, O I-3. (I) 1 I I. ;.S O C) .1 1) '.) :) ),. • 1� «i U S.. '�S i I' ' <•' 1 .). til 1 I-. r. .0 • .1 I.• co ri I-J 33. I_.• 1• :f .3 rh () .1 ) ,} 3 () •(1 'i 1 ,.3 (3 iv a ) ♦.. a r•,l • I 0 D') I Ia q '1 ''i D I• r I O 'S ..) i ) ;:i .3 I' 'D 'i Cir :i U ,3 1.... ) I' (. 1-. f:: 0 J •) 13• .C3 '3) '1 (A <, (:I . •3 .I- I) ') )1. I' C ' .3 3 ts` O • I' .• I I I I 1 ' 1 •i C) .. '•1 (J '# :1 I.I. .1 • U I'' :r 3 I.• •. 1 .i (I) ) U .) 3J o r 1.i C. I• 1-, 1 3 U •3 0 ro I• C) Fr I.; e.; ;.) :; 'h (I• t. '-S ,1 GI 's I.'., .• (I) 3 )4 3 . v rJ• ;1 ::�•..Y )�� .�.7^--1 'no\r `YvvC'J a_r o• ( ) .. ..t _'�r• A• r•-.r,.. - •.{-T^^O. . _•.^i 1 1.vC'3 V C.' G.» ."'Co..._._fir ,�_ .te , C.-. •r?. on r.r.: • C•-' .__. __o P = ; F • ,-,', carer Ems, =m^^;.e 2or �:?Z1 C 1��_± E 1.�, S ?C"."! o:: . ''E '' - C= _ -T - - -r i f. - EC -' - T,!-".= • A. .'c fence or 1]p.7-;e over +..-o an-1 on: '.L' T2? )\ 3e: h4 -h 'cc core _ructe•^'. or n^a.n:aine neere- tc t'?e -_ v"\} str=•=t =� o' '' - of than e fro"- J_ a__.'.tee-• .,.. lot. R o .74 or' re'r f a !-' t ' o _.E or or =e .:e be more tha-+ 51.. ( :) feet b h e xc"'). i'e: css bat •^to _Ja ter/i YI: erc- ^.1 lot bo ' -I1 to a -_e ?1 o" 7v � J ' e C•^, i2... _ > nay C..� :. _ � _ seven \ � feet. �• ?e'.n4 S :'' t be obt"neJ. :ror, the 7,+:1 i•a^ ±-17_27. .t•orC �--SCE •:�^' �„ to ^rec—1 c'1 of e"•re or •,e3_Ia _�`_S: -c� c' }' e 1 o4 z, - lots oti. in PS3 t +i•r° lape ' _cn 1 • - T' T7 T' ' - 0 ? ;i : at a `=-0='1• 0r 4-•1 .^ •;o ( ) '�' )r �.O' i.t e? 7C.::: ';a J..Ln =�1�- li-e These L3 ?J. i r 'Ca: 1 '_'1 - ...-irir jo to ..1-11 Cs.'"i - 1 r o -r^M5 J ^ l-_�- : „ ':�•1• . c' 1_ rit ro.' vt_ :►:r-'- o_ '..c"lc". ...' ::_'•� _ iJ.l_ .r]r. . . _O ra- 1'1 111 :0 11C^ 1'. 2. 4. � it _:. • C • . ". •" ...._ .......�_ n-' tl..._n _C _ (' ) '-et or _ si . (5) _-et _ . ,L,T ^r;i O _ ti':r r _c . r-"-.tea c Sao t :e o: •-e c,e en- : • . I ) /I- t...3 I-I 41 0 0 \ l ' "- i , • • . • • •/ .3". .3 • I../ :.!• IA/ I-I ,-. • d , ... • • s,j • , C.J. 1 i-•,, . • .1 k.3 1%) 3.... 1,3 ..-1 p 0 1 i .1. ..1 1.1.. 0' cr : ,1- 11 0 0 . 0 , • • C) •i' 0 1 5 :D I ' , 1' 0 CD 0 11 1•••' .. .• I (I ' 0 't 3 .7. „1 ,3. ..F.;. I i /I :,,' t'l- ..)• 0 C) 3 , i •+ () 0 t$ '.3 i- '..) : i'• :2,-- D C . :1' r r 3 1-$ 6' 1$ ,,1 in I 0 I 1 , .•.:, I'' l) ., &; &s .I •-• :$ . i- ci: C.,. 1 i C...1. 1) I 1.3 (). rl- .0 c), $ J io i 1 ,,-I i , , 1' ' , CD '1 , / ./ t.) '. I C 1 ) .:1) ) TS 11 0 1•1 •• p, '-.3 rl 1.1/ ) . .1 1 l :1 , ) C$ :-1 1,J 21 0 'f .• 0 3J., r ,:i c) c.) •.., c) CD t) 1 1 0 ../ e• .5 ;) 1 0 ;-1 .) 0 `• •.$ ..-1. r 1- r." -3 i" 1 •1 : 'I ,1 _ 1-- D 0 cD 0 :3 ri „, P., t.:: II e..... 1 'I .,-. ‘....3 1--, : 1- 1 * • ,. 4 ) 1+ •.• / ).1.. . ' 1 ,..1a -J ... ) (• ; ... i' CO i•-l• tj '''l 1-• 0 -• ) .1 ,.,„ 0 1" • : • " /14; .1.1 $ 0 ,•-• 3--I 1-' 17'• (5 0 CA .- 1 1 ° cl- I--J r 3 1) 1 * I-' i...) 1 1.1 1---• 31 ti c I .3 ai 0 0 hl• 3.1 .3 4 Ii) .j. 0 fl 3 I 4 1$ 1 .J 1-" ..1 ' 3 1 •• ,..-• 1%, •i C.)' ") CD c..) .--1 :_$. :0 .1 --., , .-- 5. . "1 GI I-' .(?.. 1••• C-.1 1 1 0 f' c.-3 C J (74- (0 1-1 , 5.3 e 4 ,) 0 0) j I i ) .s J ), 11 r' Cl'• C....1 CI' :I 0 -$ I 1 "..) I i 1 ro c F (') LI C3 • . , 0 -1- .1 1 o 3 c+ ii tr c.1 cl• ',:;"" I I' ,-;- '3 I.-. .I i ,y. 1-• ,•,' es- 1,, ..) 0 ,1 (.1 •• 0 1'• r‘• 1-'• •,,i i,5 ;.-j. 0 CA ''.3 ..). c F 1'o 1--1 ,li I- • I 1.1 I •-$ :-.1 t.4 1 s• .1 ..I g) * Li) ',...,- '3 ), 1-3 •• 1-'• 0 .3- :3 '..) r 1- 3-J ,; I J ) 0 r a 1 --•'-' C-I 1,3 ii) (i) 7:1 0 -.4 Z.; 4,1 0 a-. • 1 :1 '1 "..: ti) ''.) •+ ' 0 -j :3 (D (I.; :r I-' `3 ra ‘) 5 :..i •• . 5-) il. 3 I-I (J. I' ist o I-- 0 :1,- C.) Ira• C3 3'a 1,3 •) j .$ 4./ i 1 LI C.1 -1 • j 1-• .1 CD C3' (3 cl- la. 'i (i) :.I (J 1$ (0 I' 0 I.j • •• .... ., ) I ') 0 •t l'--1 I--I t) e.,-I i',.. 0 1.-.1 1 • 7: •• 0 c,,, '.1 .; C3 (-I-• •1 ) (I) 0 b 1-J 0 ,,, 0., ...- 0.. •J. C ,• 1,la • I 1 . ' . ,,, : :3 I) '..1 :3' :-3 `• 0 0 0 c.1' 4• D •f' I J r., , 0 $.• I c "...I '0 0 •• 0 tt ...--".. 11 ... .r .... c' ..1 r' ) '') )1 1-.• I"' A CD 0 rl ID 'i L ,I I'. :) • i' ; il ' . 0 -I . '-• i-$ * C•I :-..1 a3 :3 •i c . 4,1 •..... ;a '.3 ,, :-.5 'I • 0 I-, l't .,1 -4 ra 4 I I.'S. () „„,••••• •'1 P ) i 'I t.I .s Hi .-+ I-4 0 0 1 0 1.1• I-.1 s JO' W. I 13 t'...4 3 i (0 I) ,-) LI r •. :) al. ..s al rl- 1 i 0 (.3 it) „' 01 CD 1 1. i t .. r-'• p„ 1 5 ,I .. •. .-1 c . I...J GI ,_.3 f0 CD • 3 gat t.• )1 ...... 3 (-1 0 I-' $ ••3 1 9 v.; I I. 0 0 I-'• --: 0- , 1' 0 ,' , 1 .... c-'- '") 4 lo . ..) -1 ?,.6 0 4.4; • 1 J I /-1 t) .3 1 . ,1 D 1 J i •J :.1 ,... 1."*. . • 1 J., I ' el- 1 .) i/. (I. C" •C1 1--1 i$ -.: ) 11- li f II $'3 ii. .1 0 a) II 1•• 0 I j •-; •j• I .) I 13 In ,•• I-c , . • ,.. ) 'I 0 • r 1 3 Ul '''',Ja I.i i'' i-I ..• .. ,. 1'. •.. ''. (,' •$ t3 :1 ci . -... • C.) I,44 0 ..3 11 •-••• .1.-a .,i ....3' C.1 I.) '1 .1,1 4.) 4 1 (....: i • I-, .: .... /J. .. : 3-- 0 CD $0 0 fa CY la .l• ,3 c f• :3 ra 1' 0 , . '0 0 ts II 31 •1- e.: i'''' i-" .3 I'I- .() . ,- i :-S t 1 •D • 4.• , • .1.. (1- 0 ...c. Cl• (I) co 0 ;-$ .3 1 1 I CI .) I i /' 0 %.; F'J () 0 1.. 0.• c I' •• :-.1" Cr •., , 3 C.1 U t...1 ,1 J . 1-i 0 la ,i) • r:r , CD * t) ...3 1.3 • -I , i• 0 I..• 0 )t '71 • 5 0 I-i• I-' '1 1-1 c-i• I.J. ., C5 la •'. • i'• () ,j ,D 0 c 4 :3 .:$ ..i c• r i- .; (f• 0 • • :•-• c• J ,-I- '3 3 i ,$ CA 'i 11 .; I j • 1 i ) 0 .. 0 i ,.• (3 (1) 11 (• • a :, t3 .r 1-3.• •-• 1....' 1-$ . ) (..1 c a 'Cl 0 11 ;D 1. i 1 • , t-a. :--1 °. 0 t..) :14 ',.:: Cl .3 a' • • ci -1 •4 D I ' (i. $.. ..1 1$ 11 0 1$ 1 .1 .'"-•• 4 li) 1‘) 1 / .I.. 11 0 C) ..1 0 O •/ . 1 /... 'ft, e 1•- 11 ,-: 1" ,• 11 .1) 1-1 1-: (1 s) b.), ,1. ..& • 4.1 •-• I 1' $ ii .I 1 ) () o () ,1 $• 0 IS (0 i' , o i '; :I I i ".) ,) i • g C., < ; .; ,1 •• :.$ i • ,.1 (.• I-4 :j ) 3 . .. _T::T. 1 LrL.: riC. r c . • .. L —'L 1 l'••— L 1_.w 1. : r .L\; 07 t'Vv. "l L :.. .A Ci'�rl �. : I _L . .._....^_.� ' .. ' _ •arL • :-..-NCO . S7 zT O Lud� `�T • L' �t ..w . . .. ..0j �cr.T:.1 K VV �` ... .C.:�^.l•..ri.-1 a 1. Li ✓._._ 4' •L L L L r L` 0 tY�.a�` ..� �i vS+L t.i ��L :rla•— C-J L?T LL i J '.I../L T� -..��. Ck ri..l .. .-ll�r ll ' 1 ��' T i• ..:.. ��.,.., zo "-K..._ .I. .. i-L{j1.7 't tt= g..J..c'.1,0:� �* dL»: J�-:ivr_ £::u r :`•ila .—oauL ) _..� t T✓li �.`c:, .ia J r..:i�� ..iO�O... �c:.Xc�-. :T �c. ° :...�...., 1..,� u etc, I.b u.a.ZI ...i T✓:... -.� 1iL..,, 7.7.0 rr c_av 1 .6'.C.. o'-i r L P =1 - u" T-' •J °SC�a t�.lO.. ; r . ��� .w� r•G'✓i c �T�� F r r StJI: Tian s.:.i� '�C-. _O:r Z ... ...... � OVr • C.% -17r1C:, I '_ 39a.:CLL:...._ riw:. £�.... LLvL. � ✓La._ •..�1 —T- i. •.r °f : .. T —. ;0 :17S C �C /v. r`L!c•.�. o l; .tO t�o�_ . ..1..I^-'l:_ '[... Rl.a ..-0`� 1:.,.... 50 Vic. `�r:u C_ '. T?c._..:.:i 91.3 ..i cam-. 0..lv.r; 9.6.9 •.r ° T _.: �.n ..s.0 JJVJ.r. -♦ ✓..�_ l.C'.Lt O L -: `rT1 C1 n.:0L.. 33 • V v:k .+. ic.r.G:'..4LL� __L L" 1a1i ''.t ..l::l' L : l«_.�. L'.tT .T U0 .1012_13...03 • _ 7l y (. } c �. t vo T.. LLc y._ r72\l} ..�.t v •,� v v 1 U. w I I 1 L.1 ' 1 .,, I-I t1 I.) )1 hj ,1 ."I C) ') F.' O I-1 :.1 P • ;1 3 CD ) 1 ..1 i I 'i I 'i ,L I-" i Ll (9 11 (11 Ci (_: • • I ti • I' +' ' C1• CI \"J la N 3 , LI O I'• .1 "--..►I ,S c) l] • �II h)• V� • 1-S• a I i (.) O ':1 r i O u) U U 4I• c: • t ' :j ....._i IJ. ,y . V ''1 I 1 (J ' t;)- t-1 1ij N N ') V1 ly l c. O O r. i.... ) 1J :I) 1 ''1 I I'• .') ')G) CD 0 O 'J 0 CI- I•-' I-' ('I• 0 (1 C) • P• •-- ,I• ---- G) i1 I.) II 1-.1 TO F-' N) o lrl 0 ":1. 'it c ,) • PALM SPRI`•GS DEVELOPMENT APA_C'-'_E JTJY:CTIO'T, AR 70NA HOTE OWNERS RESPOP;SI_3ILITY ILIC": - al gamma esi... dam.. ••••••• Ir..Il•I,•I (hi- Ill i Ir r •.•. .r / ' ►.•r:-f r!,l:Jl` 1.!.rL! tL I S%R,I i r I i l I 11 RlrIT H 1 V ''i7 • .err..r,r.. u.. 1 1 l ! i l '3I I I I'1 i 1i,'1 ,, Fir l l ' 1 . 1 1 : I I I I I i I t1 eLIAIN" L I }� itil1.llllll1111 „ 117- ti I .l-sj.rtl..Irq•.•�.•.�• E•NE • ny `�\ _lT1 e•I.wCX EI1t^IT t ��j rs . y rl l _�.1 23 ' � . 4.� I 1 I� I 1 1 r. .• it .. s • a ' •.' ' 1 ,. a ESTEvpN I P DRIVE \ 4�9 �'•1STii EEVeN or,vE-.•t • '• -.i. "i©1111111111111 DRIVE W 6 - !` Q ' .EKED EpNE • (•' ..> �p ©®®®®VI v u,. 1 /ITO till 1111111." LA ' I DDI I I I I"L.� 'mike ®�JM - lit, list: 1111i i ..ily, r .• .r • r `C.. .1 ; STREET I(•. • .......0 21 ti.,1 ! •STREET \w\_), I, 1 E ; _ I • .ti•:r.. '...i... ,•!...1...!...!...!,..;..,'...1. _ -1 1 1 1 F. I "ill 2 to .•I. ...l•eo•,. ' ' r.1F. r. O.*** :limilis Ell .,oNDO STREET p, VV MI 11 I.•0I 4 0,0 :011.0.sr 00 114,ef Sr.."410 01.011.0.•\rt lgilimmo . ..I...'.. ...1•.is.t.lull...>,.I „I.«• ,I. .,«ra!Z gil LINO* uNt I-I-I-I'Itl' I .I 6 px tt. uEa[ut. o4w�, (.•••I...1.2' '.,1 ' ..!•, ' '•. «I•,l'.«,•y.«.l - - - 7 R . . . . .7. , : :Ir.I I::. :. . ..1 i; . . cat I ,...• a.I«.i. . I s•.`I.1..e.I 1 Ip I�I w ` ' - - - - : It . �. _ M\_ 4 . • • 1 1 \\ I •I...4 [or l•.I...I 1 I �' . 1 . N• DRIVC .l•.I..1.r., .;..; .....,i ..I....,. r.l.,..«;..r,,..J e a - (� _ - - ,?:: MI p oevavinini- i I ---,- ! litii :. . . .. . : Iil It' LIN.A I. L am( . ItI II1 -1 " i 1 ; 1 1 �i i Milli \ \ \ \ I I- I-- —I_1--1«; ..rw_.I_Ir.1..'«i.,I..�..I N•v.JO II DRIV� •��• tl: 1 E .'✓f •l. .I.«T .01—I...". 7 f i T. ..I » `f.,,,.f�� 1 - ::IIII I I -11 R 4 1 rik • . .t ...re..I..,..• more. T.«,_:.�••.�._ _ --->� - H 1 i._......I { 1 , 1 . I I I I I I I I I-1 e!w.m LL. p . :, : o. r l..l...1 •! i.i I.. <!— ..1.<I •m.•u •••r X 4 T 4 _\° 4 'sr;.. .rJtl•ri• I 11 • y!.1 - «1=I aW >;:1 i\: \E (\- T�' .;.. ( •1 _ . '. --ri,_ ,sue-- «. . • tt. 1 \.:\tal F. fl 1 . I` i It' \' \ \' t VI...l.-I—;..1�wl—.—' ..I.—. ..).. .l It ..J .. 1 ,LJj .... iv , t ,. ;\I\';"j;\r\,'V j_ \7`T, J .�-1 i 1vE 1 • ! . t r ---i t'.'4- :.- --'''',.>'e Z-".. c:i/,, .,. -,-- -!- '''.1.2--, e , A- = r%. .} --z- ,.,' 'Jj� ,-- z-.,i/.4 .7j , f .�;tf' c'�, is ', Lt'!'L�!t�V% � ,7 �,6L ....-f.---4r2"--c-‘7 /2 < `,a L'f ','t C !! 7Lv Ai /r�•/:<-C - (27,e C/ /' ,G� t �: . ' Celf i�� /Ll ezr�l - / .0 �_,.... -� � Ca..,...„4„,..,..,,, L J/•--(e it-4. 7;:--6.'-k-i / c-� ' C7 tili:i ri... „2„,,,,,,„ ,, ill ril&le4r itt-r- aei . jr ) S ' .) • ) • ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL _ MAYOR CLARKE UNANI.1OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL . • •sx 4'roxi' lg00 's'FA`:"l,e,A4°;c-A.+ia. :e<:"r,... • `c'....: ......��Li •.i.:i,,wwr.� ITEM NO , 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 94, FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 127 THE APPLICANT IS APACHE ONE PARTNERSHIP 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC ON THIS PETITION , 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME, 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A .�. TIME) 6, ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN'S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C , OPPOSED I U i �s' Z \\,,,, '4R/ZONP amity a 04puche 09unctian January 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGERiee—t, i FROM: ] JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM FEBRUARY 2, 1982 PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FEBRUARY 16, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 127 Rezoning Case No. PZ-23-81 Rezoning Request: CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone to CB-2 General Business Zone Applicant: Apache One Partnership Power of Attorney: Frank Coxon, Attorney Date of Application: November 5, 1981 r Date of Advertisement: December 27, 1981 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: January 12, 1982 Area: Five (5) Acres, including easements Application Requirements. i1' Approver for Agenda ..... . Number of Property Owners: 5 ,t/�� hem #~ Number of Exempt Properties: 2 First Rey-.:ciq n..._ • _- Number of Affected Owners: 3 Number of Signatures: 3 or 100% Secona �`"`u g ----___ Signatures by Affected Area: 100% •4Publn Hearing . ... Old Business Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) : • New Business Department of Public Safety - No comment Director of Public Works - See attached memorandum. Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer - See attached memorandum. Fire Department - Must meet city fire codes. No fire hydrants in area. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL (REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM) January 13, 1982 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: At the January 12, 1982, regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the following motion was passed by a vote of 8-0: r. "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-23-81 , also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 127, application of Apache One Partnership for their property described as the South 2 of the Northwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, requesting rezoning from CR-5 Multiple Residence zone to CB-2 General Business zone that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. The reasons for the recommendation from the public record are: 1 . There is existing CB-2 General Business zoning in the area and this rezoning would be an orderly extension of existing zoning. 2. Idaho Road and nearby Broadway Avenue are designated "arterials" on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan and would provide adequate access to the subject site. 3. There is a need for more commercial property in the Apache Junction area. Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum. ) ::.,iNiaiC,tjpauY�lTtfe„Tw;1•�u.sUu.t.-.e.ai^Y�.a..:..:,o RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 127 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZOPJA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-23-81 Application of Apache One Partnership ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NC 127 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-23-81 FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVER- ABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b. (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) ORDINANCE NO. 127 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-23-81 FROM CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVER- ABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as the South 1 of the Northwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone to CB-2 General Business Zone SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, are - hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section. sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for a period of six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 . Mayor ATTEST City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City ,ttorney` *.r ,f,+..�.'?s.;'r,+F ,..cn+t_L:*�t:,at. sa•ni /1214, PZ-23-81 (APACHE ONE PARTNERSHIP) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 127 REQUESTED REZONING FROM CR-5 (MULTIPLE RESIDENCE) TO CB-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) GR CB-2 \ 'oo o° � y CR-5 Fa s CB-2 y�9 CB-2 1 ---- Eas 'venue h�dy fl 60 TH CB-2 660'(I to SUBJEC P'OPERTY 31 ' "01•\ ' IAm - La. — . mm. .m. ftmm ammoi, East 6th Avenue i i _o p 33' GR N GR p N O s N __._._ . -0 East 7th Avenue I O SCALE A t 0 300 600 • • ' (` LL / APPLICATION roR AMENC E T Or THE LOVING ORDINANCE OR • CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUN�CTION, ARIZONA Cash Receipt No A anount� Date'//(Case Number ?.L- 2.3- &7 TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning . regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as Follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed) __._. _... .. . -... Parcel 1 Fran CR-5 To CB-2 • Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) The South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 1 �;,, ,;� a *'e< =»�.z� -�°•_,- - -. North, Range 8 East, G&SRB&M, Pinal County, Arizona. The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance fran nearest maimed street) Five (5) acres -- South of U S 60, 70, 80 and'89 on Idaho North of Broadway and on east side of Idaho (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed ) Ov\ 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting'' General Rural won't allow construction of CR-5/ shopping center and business structures 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer Many parcels in surrounding area are already CB-2 + _ 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the community or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain Yes, there is a need for additional CB-2 zoning in business district of Apache Junction 4 Other reasons for the subject request Page 1 of 2 pages Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures CR-5 Land is presently/general rural and owners desire to construct shopping center and business shops Attach any supporting information, statements or plans- to this application & submit same in person to Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona (Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing hun to apply for this change of zoning) APACHE ONE PARTNERSHIP 3220 N 3rd St. , Phnx.Az. 266-6688 (Ncine of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name & Address of ,pe((rson to whom petition & notices should be mailed) - >:.: • - AP CHE ,ONE PART SHI B (Partner) November 5, 1981 ig-- nature or applicant) (Cate) - - JJ c7: i ILL air rOLLO:dL.G (:or ounce recoros only) Pt3LIG\TION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks • Page 2 of 2 pages STANFIELD, MCCARVILLE, COXON SC FITZGIBBONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 501 NORTH MARSHALL STREET w w NT♦XT IL LD P 0 Box 555 T IOYAA A IdcCARVILLE CASA GRA.NDE, ARIZONA 85222 AREA CODE 602 FRANILIN D COXON TELEPHONE DAVID A rITZDIDI,Ofs November 13 , 1981 836-8265 ItOeItKT x YArr 11 01LDHIM) V r1orr.I oA Mr. Leo Frazier Jr. Zoning Administrator P. 0. Box K Apache Junction, Az . 85220 Re. Power of Attorney - Apache I A Partnership and Apache II Limited Dear Mr. Frazier. Please find enclosed Powers of Attorney from Apache I A Partnership and Apache II Limited directing Franklin D. Coxon to act as Attorney in Fact on their behalf in the zoning proceedings . This was requested by Mr. Gero. .p I am also requesting that the Application of Apache I A Partnership be processed simultaneously with Apache II Limited' s zoning request Sincer , F KLIN D . COXON FDC.MH Encls . cc: Joseph Gero \1'I ( I%l. I'O1\Hi OI 11-1011\1 1 It IC I lip Ih tlttt Utlt ( Wool+ tnd tin di Pinal County, Arizona • 1(I\( !Pm t\tint Idtirt s+ nun lilt( utit ' iT(ii \t 1 l\ I \( I \tau 1d,hu+ Ind lip Cmdu FRA IZIN D CDYON APACHE ONE PARTNERSHIP P 0 Box 555 Casa Grande, Arizona 85222 Principal constitutes ,nid appoints %Horn( lu I act to act as the trin anti 1.m.lid attnrncs lot Principal and t the lint pile( and stt id of Principal to perform the follossimg at Is and things • To represent APACHE ONE PARTNERSHIP, in regards to its Petition and/or Application for Rezoning from General Rural to CB-2 the following described property in Pinal County, Arizona The South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, G&SRB&M, Pinal County, Arizona • and further, to represent APACHE ONE PARTNERSHIP at all hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission of Apache Junction, Arizona, and the City of Apache Junction, Arizona and to do any and all things necessary to process � -...,.. ..,... :-s.._...< said zoning application Principal gores and grouts to Worm s ni I',ict fill pinser mil unthorits to clotand perform all and es en act nd thing %%li tlsoc st r rctlmisttt and neetssars to fit don( in and alunit the pre mists as h ilh to all intents and nlrpusc s as Principal might in could do if pi rson,tlls present Prrttc ip•tl r ttifit s and conforms tll th•d \ttuntrs- ',tct shall lass fulls du or cans( to he dune hs snlue of this spi eat posse] of,itlurnes This post r of,Moroi s Shall non he ,tfft tied hs tln,thilits of the Prtnupal •111S as 11 5501, 1 1-5502. AP 511E ONE PARTNERSHIP. BY '!a. _ (Partner) s of 11 not sst•s tit,]]urns of Principals 1 III OI ARIZOiZ4 j 1ckoo..la•JLc,,,a•,tt i f \\ Si4mttun of\ut^n Pulthe �G N is ( \I 1 OI Flits win Wont nt tt t+ leknmt IO(Ic1 it fit for !It Iles C-6.21? chit In lhk lit sinus .throat subs(rib.d w r )tit of tilts a(kn,t+Irtl,Cint nil s,Wilt d nt i rt Ito si of Umt tyta(its hh a, for Ile (1t 1'.' )I CZt)\ profit ipal n nut tl tool ni 11tt c tpa(!It ynlnt drd - tc>'=t.:, a��J I A I I. O1 I Ark it,mIcIl¢,,,,.•„t,01 St4n Min of Vol trt 1'nhl,e Ss 01'\11 ()II , 1•his nulrunn In is is teknntt It dot d lit fore uu this ss tt( o(Ihr. uknmel,fig(nu ut tl ilt I.% Ile lit rimy, thin, sub ,ilkd nttl I(snit - nil,tl ii I rt pt.(it mil Ili rtp:tt,l+ Ih,et tilt 1 \ol ut I splrtlutn I)tit Ills PtInt teal it um d bud nn lilt rip:tctlt uuh•i not) Ins tnsintnu ni to Is rrt.,rdt tl it lit, rt tint+t n) C I III. OI ) (I R 1 I I IC•1 I I ()I ( Ol \I 1 ()I )cs III(.OHI)11 IO\ I tv nth ih it thus mu ttmint,111 to is rt cvtrdt it nu Olt tl no -it Ih. hunt in ill! dock!I hi Luuunw tvlh tilt pact utnnh(t Ind tt.tit Ilk It•( numb!I st impt d nt tilt lop spat( or Ihu inarumi lit If tla Inslrunto ill is of utulttplt p.it,t c llii tlixket Ind page +.t `• luilh r(prt si ui th, first pap of (hat utstrumu mil Ind than 'tabu (Si,milt+ tlniught Dot k(1 _ _ __ I'.Iht 't , I ACHE ... .•. icy „ %,.. AFC 1 ;, lg8 t" v7F.;; t, 0 1 r.-.tti'pir. U ,, .,'iii , z P '1R,ZoN `0ity o &479ache o9unction .. December 16, 1981 TO: Executive Secretary, Planning & Zoning Commission n, 7 THRU: Director of Public Works �%�L; (y, 7, -� FROM: Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer RE: PZ-23-81 Apache One Partnership PZ-24-81 Apache Two Limited PZ-25-81 Vincent Matousek PZ-26-81 James Bunnell At present, the lack of a complete line of competitive business establishments causes the citizens of this community to drive to Mesa, Phoenix, etc. , to obtain the merchandise or services they require. Currently, business development in the City is being hampered to a degree since a majority of the land that is presently zoned for r► business (CB-1 and CB-2) is already developed. The need for additional business seems clear, and since all of the land for the above-requested rezonings fronts on major streets, the rezonings seem appropriate. We realize that water, both supply and disposal, is a concern in the community. We feel, though, that the City's course of action needs to be one of solving those problems by working on obtaining a source of supply and method of disposal rather than attempting to do the impossible of stopping growth (i.e. : progress). For these reasons, we recommend the approval of the requested rezonings. LF:sw cc: Director of Public Works 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-0002 it (Apache c2unctioa, INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Off, c� DATE: December 18, 1981 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Acting City Manager/ Director of Planning FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PZ-23-81 A review of this application indicates the project is in Flood Zone B. The legal description should exclude those areas within the Highway 60 right-of-way, in which case the acreage would be less than five acres. A separate application has been submitted for the abandonment of the roadway on the north side of the project. That legal description is in error and is being corrected at this time. No objection to this application. RWB/cc ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM /I MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITh, , COUNCILMAN DA.MIANO VICF MAYOR HII I _ MAYOR CI ARKF UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL • iiiMIerviliii6g "t _, iA.,?`ta. 'd aAw...kl is ' •;s.y i.ri:.-.�,e. ..M:.-�f.as..Mf�7arwexurv. .: ITEM NO, 6 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 127, FOR THE FIRST READING , PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 128 "oak . THE APPLICANT IS APACHE TWO LIMITED 2. WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC ON THIS PETITION . 3. IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME . 4, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6. ANY REBUTTAL ( IF CONTROVERSY — OR NEED — CHAIRMAN' S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED r rPQACHEj k n .Y '�xy y,O qii, "IR,ZpNP cOity o 04pache 2unction January 13, 1982 p MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER it -' FROM• JJOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM FEBRUARY 2, 1982 PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FEBRUARY 16, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 128 Rezoning Case No. PZ-24-81 Rezoning Request: GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone Applicant: Apache Two Limited Power of Attorney: Frank Coxon Date of Application: November 23, 1981 • Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: January 12, 1982 Area: 20 Acres + including easements '� Date of Advertisement: December 27, 1981 Application Requirements: ddA/Approver for Agenda (_ — Number of Property Owners: 14 Ditto/ Item # Number of Exempt Properties: 1 First Rea,.',g !d�g .....2.7..... ._ Number of Affected Owners: 13 Number of Signatures: 8 or 61% Second R44:ing Signatures by Affected Area: 75%+ �ubfic Hearing Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) : Old Business New Business Department of Public Safety - No Comment Director of Public Works - See attached memorandum. Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer - See attached memorandum. Fire Department - Must meet city fire codes. No fire hydrants in area. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL (REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM) January 13, 1982 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: At the January 12, 1982, regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the following motion was passed by a vote of 8-0: i. "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-24-81 , also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 128, application of Apache Two Limited for the property described as the South 2 of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 21 , Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, requesting re- zoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business zone that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. The reasons for the recommendation from the public record are: 1 . There is existing CB-2 General Business zoning in the area and this rezoning would be an orderly extension of existing zoning. 2. Idaho Road and nearby Broadway Avenue are designated "arterials" on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan and would provide adequate access to the subject site. 3. There is a need for more commercial property in the Apache Junction area. Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum. ) • RECOMMENDED MOTION a ORDINANCE NO. 128 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-24-81 , application of Apache Two Limited ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 128 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-24-81 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a. 'Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) /0,16. c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) • .:•.,:.:,ems.., - ._ kr.+- �.��.�^. ,;mac":.".:.ea•.^+&�, �zn,aw 7 ^ 1 ,::arc.. _. r+vn-o=a,- ..^.. -o-... ORDINANCE NO 128 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-24-81 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS * r, " - _'',;..FH z :3 ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES _ I BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. - ,- — SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning . Map for the parcel of land described as: the South : of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of -- - this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this I ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent Jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for a period of six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19_ Mayor ATTEST. City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Cit Atto ey Aloft, P7-"L',-El (APA[I'.E TWO LIMITED) / PROPOSED ORD{@AKE NO. 1918 ' ` � REqUESTED REZONING FROM aR (GENERAL RURAL) TO CB-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) LEGEND cu-c SUBJECT PROPERTY ` -- --- -_� ~ � y� `� ' -- CK- 2 CB-2 «0 U � cx-� cx-s «- Gn c sm Ave [f// FA �� � - cu z °=~ p � U � V � Ave.Aff Apo V) U� ` Tx ° ax A 1-77 E. Broadway Ave. � - -__ - 40 � � ^ � � CB-1 Cn-1 � GR = " Ln = - ' N SCALE | ' | 0 300 600 feet ` ` (( 3 (,tic 1•\ LEIVED NOV 2 3 1118i Ian (lI (l �, APl'I TL\1iov POR All1\9X?.:rl Of 1111• ZONING ORDINANCE OR t.'_•ti(I O'' 70.U11;(, DISi'RICI POUQDARIES 11)P, r• ',•fill JU CfION, ARIZONA .. .`Y: ,�a r<•:. '"• 54g, Ca la RaLLi.l,t co Lq i ',_•i:S i U.tt.e////4 Case Nunber /7/- i- S1 i'0 /V'At.IL, Li TO I11-1 ((r":( '1. • I :uti•t,; It c (1.. •u a,• Li L. 1.1.1c 1t wn, n1 .m2110••1c:nt Lo Lhe zoning . •r •'t' at tt • .t •',••) I „ 1 ,1t_t tl i'�.,.:t , u lcr•.•, (11.•.t tin:_ plc•enL 'on- sn , t11 t 'I• rlr itL pnccl , ,•.. �1 .1• i t' 3t r1...:•r1• t• u'� t••:1 , t t1 :'1'u o (Join 1i'. pl.opo t_at) ._ _ I'It t.c 1 1 1 Loul GENERALRURAL To CB-2 Parcel 2 GENERAL—RURAL CB-2 Parcel 3 rRNF.RAT. RITRAT. CB-2 Parcel 4 GFNRRAT. RTTRAT. CB-2 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. The s1 •e (to ncre t tenth of an acre) & t•'nca 11 ltt. atlol or t'c sublc,.L p onttt 1., .1', lulls: (1• r c'acctaal .`t c1 :1c,. _1,1 •a- • c v•i _t 1 Four - five (5) .1cie p.11cels -- Northeast cornet of Lio.1c1w a; and Idaho Apache Junction, final County, Arizona _ (Please answer the following questions in the space provided of .ubaait a Lep nat e signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting? General Rural won't allow construction of • ghnpping center and business structures 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered Lhe character of your property, or adjoining propeity, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer Many parcels in surrounding area are already CB-2 3 If your requested change is to piovide additional corrmercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the camunity or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain Yes, there is a need for additional CB-2 zoning in business district of Apache Junction 4 Other reasons for the subject request Page 1 of 2 pages -•:,k, ,t..rh+s.Yirtt�,:.a!sks9CYux„Ar...K+...^ys. r> Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures. Land is presently general rural and owners desire to ,�, ,N oH"gk construct shopping center and business shops Almk Attach any supporting information, statements or plans- to this application & submit sane in erson to- Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache • _.. . Junction, Arizona Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) APACHE TWO LIMITED, a partnership 3220 N. 3rd St , Phnx,Az. 266-6688 (N,tie of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Nare of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name & Address of person to wham petition & notices should be mailed) APACHE TWO LIMITED, a partnership ; :::c`-.•:.. ...ti.,� • ,: By �, cy 21 ` (Partner) 7-z 3-(i/ (. La of applic tY_� (Date) *Noce Plans are required when application is filed for following Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Rrks- • Page 2 of 2 pages :'�:�•a.!s.'�.?a�T e�,Sr2 !k•"�fp.rr'-'ra;,a • EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL NO. 1: The South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona; EXCEPTING all coal, oil, gas and other mineral deposits, as reserved unto the United States of America in the Patent of said land. PARCEL NO. 2: The South half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona; EXCEPTING all coal, oil, gas and other mineral deposits, as reserved unto the United States of America in the Patent of said land. PARCEL NO. 3: The North half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona; EXCEPTING all coal, oil, gas and other mineral deposits, as reserved unto the United States of America in the Patent of said land. PARCEL NO. 4: The North half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range M East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona; EXCEPTING all coal, oil, gas and other mineral deposits, as reserved unto the United States of America, in the Patent of said land. irs ikCHE r 4 r n� 1 ' O 98 rtrrki qR/ZONP amity o f C4pache 09unction December 16, 1981 TO: Executive Secretary, Planning & Zoning Commission 7 THRU: Director of Public Works ? JET) • 4 FROM: Zoning Administrator/Acting City Engineer RE: PZ-23-81 Apache One Partnership PZ-24-81 Apache Two Limited PZ-25-81 Vincent Matousek PZ-26-81 James Bunnell At present, the lack of a complete line of competitive business establishments causes the citizens of this community to drive to Mesa, Phoenix, etc. , to obtain the merchandise or services they require. Currently, business development in the City is being hampered to a degree since a majority of the land that is presently zoned for business (CB-1 and CB-2) is already developed. The need for additional business seems clear, and since all of the land for the above-requested rezonings fronts on major streets, the rezonings seem appropriate. We realize that water, both supply and disposal, is a concern in the community. We feel, though, that the City's course of action needs to be one of solving those problems by working on obtaining a source of supply and method of disposal rather than attempting to do the impossible of stopping growth (i.e. : progress). For these reasons, we recommend the approval of the requested rezonings. LF:sw cc: Director of Public Works 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 `O^ a &4pache 9unon INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM CFC !gg DATE: December 18, 1981 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Acting City Manager/ � Director of Planning FROM: Director of Public Works c) � SUBJECT: PZ-24-81 A review of the application revealed the project is in a Flood Zone B, including an A Zone at the southeast corner. No objection to this application. RWB/cc ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON , COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL .....�;.�:a.+;e:e-vcS.+�-�.rxirwfr•..e.ve1:«�i�a.�x r.:,;.�wr�.rc . ,.. -.c.�a,;: -.. ,. ... , ITEM NO , 7 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 128, FOR THE FIRST READING , PUBLIC HEARING C 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 134 SWAP MEET VENDOR SPACE FEES 2, IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME, 3, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, g.ACHF✓G 4 y "9,Q/ZONP ` Zt a� ?lac 2e ( UflCt zon January 28, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: ACTING CITY MANAGER lt,%6% FROM: ACTING CITY CLERK SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT - - - ORDINANCE NO. 134, SWAP MEET VENDOR SPACE FEES At the regular Council meeting of January 19, 1982, direction was given to the Acting City Manager, by a unanimous vote of Council , to amend the sections of the Business License ordinance which pertains to Park and Swap. Specifically, the amendments would provide for a fee of 35(t per space to be collected from each vendor by the Park and Swap proprietor as a City "Business Occupational Service Tax". This fee would then in turn be submitted to the City. The attached ordinance provides for all of the above. Additionally, as per Council request, it includes the emergency clause which would make it effective immediately. If you have any questions, please contact me. Ri�c./_jze (_"r9-r%-ram /� ,�l~/KATHLEEN CONNELLY pq ,ew;/2 Acting City Clerk " y :„ �' ,K7;' Approver for Agenda.__Zt.?.L i Date Item # Firs+Reat'7ng KC/WM/lvc :9/a/z —�...g..:_._, Sec Re .ding ....... Public Hearing -__- Old Business -____ New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ORDINANCE NO 134 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 8-6 SWAP MEET OPERATIONS, SECTION 8-6-1 DEFINITIONS /111, AND SECTION 8-6-4 REGULATIONS AND ADDING SECTION 8-6-6 SCHEDULE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That Article 8-6 Swap Meet Operations, Section 8-6-1 Definitions, be amended to read as follows Section 8-6-1 Definitions In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires A "Advertisement" means the attempt by publication, dissemination, solicitation or circulation, oral or written, to induce directly or indirectly any person to enter into any obligation or acquire any title or interest in any merchandise or engage in any sale at a swap meet B. "Business Occupational License Tax" means those sums payable to the City by the swap meet proprietor, pursuant to Article 8-5 of the City Code C "Business Occupational Service Tax" means those sums payable to the City by the swap meet vendor, through the swap meet proprietor, pursuant to Section 8-6-6 of this Article of the City Code. D "Clerk means the city clerk or deputy city clerk of the City of Apache Junction E. "Department of Public Safety" means the department within the City responsible for the protection of life and property and for the enforcement of the laws of the State of Arizona and the City of Apache Junction. F "Merchandise" means any new or used object, wares, goods, commodities, personality and intangibles, real estate, amusements, food concessions or services G. "Person" means any natural person or his legal representative, —"-- — - partnership, domestic or foreign corporation, any company trust, business entity or association, any agent, employee, salesperson, partner, officer, director , member, stockholder, associate or trustee. H "Premises" means any building, structure, lot or other area at which a swap meet sale is conducted. I. "Proprietor's License" means a current and valid license issued by the City of Apache Junction to the swap meet proprietor authorizing the use of the premises owned or controlled by the proprietor, as specified on the proprietor's license, for the purpose of conducting a swap meet. J "Sale" means any sale, offer of sale or attempt to sell any merchandise, including any exchange, offer for exchange or attempt to exchange or barter any merchandise at a swap meet K "Swap Meet" means a place of commercial activity, popularly known as a swap meet, flea market, park-and-swap, open to the general public for the purchase of merchandise on the premises, which place is available to the general public who wish to sell or barter merchandise on the premises, whether such sellers or vendors are in the business of vending or are making casual sales or some combination thereof and which place is normally composed of stalls, stands or spaces �, �r • ^: '°~ = allotted to vendors at least one of whom does not occupy the same allotted space or spaces on an uninterrupted continuous daily basis L "Swap Meet Proprietor" means any person who rents, sells, donates or otherwise makes available to swap meet vendors any space within premises owned or controlled by the proprietor for the purpose of a swap meet sale. M "Swap Meet Vendor" means any person upon the premises for the purpose of causing the advertisement of or making a sale at a swap meet N. "Transaction Privilege Tax" means those sums payable to the City by the swap meet vendor pursuant to Article 8-3 of the City Code. 0. "Vendor Registration Report" means a monthly report from the proprietor to the City of Apache Junction. P "Vendor Registration Log" means a well-bound volume kept by the proprietor to identify vendors Q. "Vendor Sales Receipt" means a receipt, in a form approved by the City, to be issued by each vendor to each person to whom a sale is made by the vendor for each article of merchandise sold for twenty-five dollars or more R "Park and Swap Operations" means any activities referred to in Section 8-6-1 (J) Section 8-6-4 That Regulations, be amended by adding subsection (E) as follows E The swap meet vendor shall pay to the swap meet proprietor such fees as established in Section 8-6-6 of this Article. All such fees collected by the swap meet proprietor shall be payable in full to the City of Apache Junction by said swap meet proprietor each month. That Section 8-6-6 Schedule be added, to read as follows: „�� ...�...,. Section 8-6-8 Schedule All swap meet vendors shall pay to the swap meet proprietor a Business Occupational Service Tax in the amount of 35C per day for each space or stall rented by the swap meet vendor at the swap meet. All such fees shall be payable at the same time as the rental fees prescribed by the swap meet proprietor SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is Ordinance No. 134 Page Two .01► L for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of peace, health, and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Ordinance shall be effective immeidately upon passage and adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1982 WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor - •.ate. ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • DA D F. ALEXAN ER City Attorney Ordinance No. 134 Page Three ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 16 SECONDED BY : 49 Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON V f COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V VICE MAYOR HILL \/:/ MAYOR CLARKE V UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM II MEETING OF CCMOTION BY: LCP/ SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED . COUNCILMAN SHANKS ` / ELMI COUNCILMAN STE S TN V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE MAYOR HILL j _ MAYOR CLARKE V _ UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ..i')bl�ia`SwAt=J.N'«:l'FISa• 4Y%:rva `_;1:r_.,.r .,.'r::� d.�r.. . .. ..- : �.. - -...+V.+�na_.•+ k a.. x v$. • {,i+ �„�a.Yl.rwiadx�++!a':::w�krw�:t'r%.aiMt{i..-^.,�. „m.•; :,.v...,,,�.:....q:;. ,_ ,. '..:,.:' _.:::z- ;:a,c.'., ,...:-.;. ,. ,:'..,. .`u _. _. _. -' ' ITEM NO , 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO . 134, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THAT THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if it does not have a unanimous vote, the City Clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 134 FOR THE FIRST READING WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . FIRST READING (WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) to • z y cae- . > 4J �r r.• � K • � zx. thT 4 !llbb ITEM NO, 8 STEP 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO . 134, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if it does not have a unanimous vote, the City Clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) STEP 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO , 134 BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. STEP 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 134, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 8-6 SWAP MEET OPERATIONS, SECTION 8-6-1 DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 8-6-4 REGULATIONS AND ADDING SECTION 8-6-6 SCHEDULE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED . FOR APPROVAI (FIRST READING WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE) '+bitter"'" X ,n --. ..,i.... .s. ' ?i'i'>t..iAY�d+. ._6.: r.;:;� ..rs:±t 'S'Zliiw�orwa :..:�.,..'F4 a+�sMe�sw,r��r'a+s"lr *�s��^�'�rs���.'��'.�"tlN""Ywr4{�-,,. • _ . _ _ . ITEM NO . 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 134, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 8-6 SWAP MEET OPERATIONS, SECTION 8-6-1 DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 8-6-4 REGULATIONS AND ADDING SECTION 8-6-6 SCHEDULE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED . FOR DENIAL rs,....t,, ,, .... sACI-1\\ 0 0 ,. . rir,, z , ,. ..-..4,. ..--...,• :. gRVZO�P e,i)it •() ig ace 2u,nction ... January 27, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. ACTING CITY MANAGER /.4)i41,1 FROM: ACTING CITY CLERK SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT--- APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD Attached are copies of the four Talent Bank applications received for the two vacant positions on the Library Board. Action on one of these vacancies has been tabled since the regular Council meeting of December 16, 1981. The Council unanimously accepted the resignation of Elizabeth Burks at the regular meeting of January 5, 1982, creating a second vacancy. Since the Library Board now has only five (5) of the required seven (7) members, the new appointments should be considered at this time so as to permit maximum operation of the Board. This is especially important at this time because of the official acquisition of the City library on February 1, 1982. SUGGESTED RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council appoint two (2) members to the Library Board to fill the unexpired terms. i /f2 �E _,� ,e_,���� �y'. Apprcwer for Agenda_/dl. fry';._..._._... t-KATHLEEN CONNELLY 0 �D +.� it. # Acting City Clerk FL-+Rea. .,g .. l._.9 ...1-..,., KC/1 v c - Pubdk Healing , 14m 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 • ("INCH 2 O�► U ;: -`' ik y Z gRIZONP ity o 04pache 02unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR 9 , /I,- .9 r-I/ BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE' f DATE: . 1 :, 1., , / //gc NAM : �L K.h n-7, 1 I-- A ( I- q TELEPHONE: ?,��, / (office) or ADDRESS: CODE: �.��.V O OCCUPATION: Cl FT/ c E--__ Al :4 4/4-, e'-- - A -, /-3 l - ) `� / ('° /1 ia\„, A - ,- 0 f (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession)i ?o. ,,,,I. vvi ,, Y, C c EDUCATION: /7, i/ ,5` /7 4 _ n/ - if4c 5' ; 11 -e ; S ,� /(,c7/ / PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: C Il ct 1,,e 4 /4/ _ _ 4 4,,"1-` 1,e„L— 0 T C"-\-1-1 N.Y, f 1 c! '�ca' //C, / /1/, 71 / r s - 17 )"-C! F7 / / 1-1'1/ cs 4/>- i-v, ,-1. t/c 1-, G-, / it I /--) `I- I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE /,' ✓ / '� ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: On ;q / /411i r L, / NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Signature of Applicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE 50X K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 SlaC.HF • G .,. q�, nk. Z L gRaOtAP I wzt y on e•pac/le 09unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION . _ OR• `t_ 7 , �-ifixe x -= BOARD/COMM I SS I ONtCOMM I TTEE /� LG� 4 DATE: 7- -2S-yD NAME' 4� ,Cr/� LL - TELEPHONE: (home) (office) ADDRESS: . ZIP CODE: 5Sr 2-D OCCUPATION: — ��i (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: jcZ„..... - P R O:ESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ^ AL G�ylir/stir c.��y l// I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/CO 1ISSION/COA4{ITTEE BECAUSE ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and Countylegislators for q � recommendations of citizen., to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. . '�? z . 1 Sigy)i ure of Applicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE (602) 952-6154 PQ AC HE✓ei 'k. O U , ' i. yz -41!:-)// gR1ZONP (/Jitj pac`ie 2unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION ae-,76, 16 FOR '�L� BOARD/COMM I SS I ON/COMM I TTEE f� DATE: / • /C� ' D Z NAME: �/ 1(,'� y"/ee61 (/)r l//a i S TELEPHONE: (home) (office) ADDRESS: / _ .`ZIP CODE: J aQ OCCUPATION: /01)l!f'!n!c /ech4,c, /a - Rvco (if retired, pl se indicate former occupation or professio ) /N�SQ- EDUCATION: 9j'A t2u�� //e,5---/�(f51-l5`/- _cYIC - C%(0U/� E, laie/ fif-(711,1 /���CL c `C/1/11 /,01, i4(r�//P /2 4t /int-e(t/e/ orn •S-L/- PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: /r /)u)61 i<" ��o��E>h z�r 71-'0op/5/(1 I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE l_ ha tie- wiCh 5 c Cc3Ll c e i''I) r i1 -the ct h j'/' fY of 'Me 7 -to ?C c /� ;61 //,teo s ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATIONaEFERENCES / Q /e ���pyt At{ N ^ P11GYmc;_s f.3.7•O/9S a. JO%i1 r1 cop, 14 s Z, Ak•ai,i414 %g;-i//O 5x1 asp 3r FQ k/, NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. = �Y �; ,. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that, ,= is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 dayS,X,m. roM t.me_"u less „ `?.• authorized by the Mayor and Council. •`af�" '�, �+;��,;.,�;x .,; �;; 7 i ature of plrcane _ _ 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • T OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZON 85229 • -TELEPHONE(602)982-6154 ��' ' OIN PQp,CHE T.), A f•-‘ g4'1Z00‘ Zt y o7j c liac/ieunction TALENT BANK APPLICATION • • FOR // .4 rayy ,;. Boa„�/C�����-f-e,�/Co� ��1 T T E" DATE: -_! a n • / — 2 Z NAVE: B Qh Q hGj 5 C1I io TELEPHONE: (home) V ZIP CODE: 5 a- Zd OCCUPATION. (if retired, please indicateformer occupation or profession) EDUCATION: cZe_ PROFESSIONAL AND/OR CO;DSUNITY ACTIVITIES. /9 7 9_ �!!,/-7,07Ph g___etdi ?h071-cfp--7 I(' D Pow2,-- /98/— Sc ni — Pr 2 Selves - Rte.- --ter ^ ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: —T£�'p- 1/, ,5.- QAO/) Seder\ Elect/or Lew (5 / 7 /y Cumde/i NO1C• As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public From time to tire, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizen; to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/S1 Signature of Applicant 1CO1 NC2TH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION A2IZCNA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ANP ejv /0/' ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH / COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE V / UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL •nei��.�:iF.P .. ':.P:?�rs++� u.n.,.;�r-�T:.,+; ..:.s..„: .rx.:.,,�......-...,��: e,. :r.. H � ...�;.. ... - .... ..ewilkleof.nr:bw:Gs-.t•Y::¢saskhrfar•-n=+TiM..N..E•-..::.- .. <s;.:. ..,,..a::o...5..: I.:.: ..:. ,n,.,=: <:. _ te. -_ .. _ ITEM NO . 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE ITEM REGARDING THE APPOINTMENT OF LIBRARY BOARD MEMBERS BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM ## MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : -r-6 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN FIDSON / . COUNCII MAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCIL MAN STFFLSMITI- V COUNCILMAN PA.MIANO VICE MAYOR NHL MAYOR Cl ARKF V ; UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 'niH1�: .yilr?6L _ .�1!�sd`xi:�Nar_k'.+w�t3ti:-� .. ,a•,.:w;"E.....r...-.•.,.;:a• F r Y a _ .. .:: '"�,-may'.,.`,�i..F°' ... .'""-.vim,.,. it�'4'"`''' Amilk Adm. ITEM NO, 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CI Y O :IL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT L UN1 '- BE APPOINTED TO SERVE ON THE APACHE JUNCTION LIBRA Y OARD FOR THE TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985, AND THAT �� BE APPOINTED FOR THE UNEXPIRED TERM ENDING JUN 30, 1984. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM II MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMIT / COUNCILMAN DAMIANO v COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS I VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE UNANI. OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL /.14k ;:.� ..Asa,....... - _ . .......,,..... .. ,... - • • /111 _ .. :- . .... .. ._' �- �s'iCr�'s.,icu'.>XS.=.it:Bei.:�✓der'tic.;v. .: ..c,; ,e :.r.:;r.....r... >.. .u:ri'twr...rr.. ..m :ti.�^.. S� bit6m.:n«�. ���:r";hK`w. �: �ry�f.;'^'?,�'�'y:,`^ ITEM NO . 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA ON FEBRUARY 16, 1982 , AT 6 :00 [Dir. ("IACHF✓ 04, o 'AtpU u: �► . z '�RIZONP Vity of 04pache 09unction January 27, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: BILL McDANIEL, ACTING CITY MANAGER 1)., M FROM. JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Cw CHUCK NEWCOMER, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VACANCY There currently exists one vacancy on the Board of Adjustment membership for the remainder of a term to expire June 30, 1983. Since problems may arise in establishing a quorem at Board of Adjustment meetings (particularly as the vacation season ap- proaches) , I would request that the Council consider filling this vacancy as soon as possible. CRN.rin xc: Administrative Services File 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JANUARY 19 , 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION January 19 , ' : 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY TIE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA, BE AND HEREBY IS ACCEPTED WITH ITEM #10 WAIVED. (motion carried. ) THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF DECEMBER 29 , 1981 , BE ACCEPTED,AS PRESENTED. (Motion carried. ) THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JANUARY 12 , 1982 , BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1982 , BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE , SUBMITTED BY THE DESERT QUEEN Applicant notifi TRAILER PARK, BE AND HEREBY IS , RECOMMENDED Disposition FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF sent to State. REVENUE , BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY. (motion carried. ) C.C . THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 120 , BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE .�. ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) THAT ORDINANCE NO. 120 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CTIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONIN CASE PZ-20-81 FROM GENERAL RURAL (GR) TO TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/ PD) , REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES , BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANS , LETTER. , STIPULATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE, AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THAT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS APPROVED MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE GENERAL CRITERIA AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 33 . 09 OF THE ZONING ORDINANC ; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JANUARY 19 , 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION (1) THE CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZES THE SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIIN AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE LAND USE COMMITTEE HAVE MADE IN DEVELOPING INFORMATION FROM WHI« • THEY HAVE CONCLUDED A PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY. HOWEVER, IN THIS CASE , TII APPLICATION FOR THE TRAILER HOMESITE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TH/PD) HAS REQUIRED ADVANCE SUBSTANTIAL EFFORT BY THE APPLICANT WHO , IN GOOD FAITH, PREPARED A COMPLETE APPLICATION WHICH WAS PRESENTED TO THE CITY FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION PRIOR TO THERE BEING COMPLETE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE WHICH ULTIMATELY WA . MADE AVAILABLE BY THE LAND USE COMMITTEE THE DAY PRIOR TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIIN CONSIDERATION OF THIS APPLICATION. IT APPEA'. TO THE CTIY COUNCIL THAT IT WOULD BE UNFAIR TO PLACE UPON THIS APPLICANT THE NECESSITY TO CHANGE HIS PLANS WHEN INFORMATION HAD NOT BEEN AVAILABLE. (2) THE CITY COUNCIL TAKES NOTE THAT THE APPLICATION PROPOSED, WITH THE LOCAL STREETS NOW ABANDONED, WOULD HAVE MINIMUM LOT SIZES APPROXIMATELY 14 , 000 SQUARE FEET WHICH IS SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER THAN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE AS REQUIRED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND WHICH, IS LARGER THAN THE MINIMUM 10 , 000 SQUARE FEET WHICH WOULD BE THE MINIMUM SIZE 0 LOTS PROPOSED IN MOST OF THE COMMUNITY BY THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN. (3 ) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 'DOES HAVE FRONTAGE AND, THEREFORE, ACCESS ON IRONWOOD DRIVE WHIC WOULD GIVE ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR THE MOVEMENT Letter mailed OF MOBILE UNITS IN THE AREA AND SHOULD BE 1/21/82 ABLE TO HANDLE ANY TRAFFIC WHICH MAY BE Plannin: GENERATED. (motion carried. ) THAT REZONING CASE PZ-21-81 , ALSO KNOWN AS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 121 , APPLICATION OF VINTON PECK, BE AND HEREBY IS , IS ACCEPTED Plannin:Letter mailed AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (motion carries . ) 1/20/82 THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 125, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) THAT ORDINANCE NO. 125 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONIN DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JANUARY 19 , 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION PZ-22-81 FROM TRAILER HOMESITE (TH) TO GENERA; RURAL (GR) ; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS , APPROVED; FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS ; A. "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED Letter mailed BY REFERENCE. " (motion carried. ) Plannin: 1/20/82 THAT THE APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND UNDER THE RECREATION AND PUBLtC PURPOSE ACT BE AND HEREBY IS , APPROVED. BE IT FURHER RESOLVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN Application TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE submitted to ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE THE C.M. BLM, waiting for DESCRIBED BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND FOR C . S . status report. THE PURPOSE OF A CITY PARK. (motion carried. ) Planning, THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MS ELIZABETH BURKS FROM THE LIBRARY BOARD, BE AND HEREBY I S, Ms Burks note f i ec ACCEPTED WITH REGRET. (motion carried. ) C.C . of acceptance. THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON FEBRUARY 2 , Posted 1/22/82 1982 , AT 6 : 00 P.M. (motion carried. ) C .C . THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO AMEND SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE REGARDING BUSINESS LICENSES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH A STAGGERED SCHEDULE FOR THE RENEWAL OF BUSINESS LICENSES City Clerk AND TO ADOPT A MINIMAL OCCUPATIONAL SERVICE prepared Ord. CHARGE SCHEDULE FOR THE APACHE JUNCTION PARK C .M. with emergency AND SWAP. (motion carried. ) C.C . clause. THAT MR. JAMES TUVELL BE HIRED AS CITY MANAGER AT A STARTING SALARY OF $35 ,500 . 00 PER YEAR IN TWENTY-SIX (26) EQUAL INSTALLMENTS AND IN personnel and ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 12 , EFFECTIVE applicant FEBRUARY 1 , 1982. (motion carried. C.C . notified - contract signed. THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8 . 25 P.M. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING JANUARY 19, 1982 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION November 18, 1981 THAT 90 DAYS PRIOR TO AWARDING THE INSURANCE COMPANY NEXT YEAR AN ADVERTISEMENT BE RUN IN THE PAPER SOLICITING BIDS FROM ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES THAT Bids to be MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN PROVIDING LIABILITY INSURANCE advertised 3/82 FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROVIDE :OUNCIL MEMBERS WITH A PROPOSED CALENDAR OUTLINING INITIAL STEPS TO FRAME A CHARTER FOR THE CITY OF 4PACHE JUNCTION NO LATER THAN AUGUST 1 , 1981. THAT THIS COUNCIL ADVERTISE AND ENCOURAGE LOCAL INTERESTED :ITIZENS TO SUBMIT TALENT BANK APPLICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT TO INTERIM BOARD TO STUDY THE ADVANTAGES Report to be DR DISADVANTAGES OF THE CHARTER FORM OF GOVERNMENT IN submitted to PACHE JUNCTION AND TO RENDER THEIR REPORT NO LATER Council prior to THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THEIR DATE OF APPOINTMENT. C.M. 3/17/82 January 5, 1982 THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO FURTHER STUDY THE QUESTION OF ANNEXATION OF THE PROPOSED AIRPORT PROPERTY AND Joint P&Z/Airpor REPORT TO THE COUNCIL THEIR FINDINGS WITHIN THE NEXT Commission, SIX MONTHS. (motion carried. ) proceeding with study. ... Aft. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING DECEMBER 16, 1981 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO CHECK INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF USING 10% OF EXCESS BUILDING FEES City Attorney TO GO TO THE SWIMMING POOL FUND. (Mayor Clarke) C.M. checking legal p ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ....., })i. , tY-/u k(e)/ \j( 16 .1)) Y U .. c , 1 ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: \\ -- SECONDED BY: 115 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN DAMIANO 1 COUNCILMAN EIDSON 1 COUNCILMAN HUDSON i COUNCILMAN SHANKS li COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE UM1 BAN ,",OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION ON THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY CALLED FOR FEBRUARY , 1982 AT P .M, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THE CITY MANAGER IS HEREBY INSTRUCTED TO MAKE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR THIS MEETING , OPTIONAL DATES AVAILABLE 3 7THURSDAY FEBRUARY 4 FRIDAY FEBRUARY 5 WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 1C Adak. Aio • , . ;,„..,,...... e...-c4.41414:64u,g4'*-itor,Avoik4A,Npl....to•-,%,- •= • ,=•••-,K=•,,,'-41.•ci.4.-42•4h,t4.6wa,?,,44 4 =-•t• 4-• ` - • • • = BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CTIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL COMPLEX ON THE DAY OF , 1982, AT P.M. REGARDING THE PROPOSED SUB-DIVISION ORDINANCE. A. A. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES c ITEM II MEETING OF �II MOTION BY: 1 SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE MAYOR HILL _ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL /" • • y+eiiiNG6=iii'FC7Y.S`#++.IRS :!"+rrz+btli, :iactlat-icrr r • . .,.., .:-... ..,r>a..... Maiae. Atailk .++.ayfa64ire+'nw&xhi'iwLM«5Y`Sa+LIfR'.wb�M14►flNai#�w•�r�k+r.!�:K;.* �.ae�: ..,.'`, _,....._,.# � ,�yr:...+� .,. t. .....,,t Jgi�11r;O+�s .. - -. ._ - ITEM NO. 12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P . M. I 'ONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA N OFFICE MEMO January 15, 1982 >96,c1 TO: ART AUERBACH Chief Regional Planner FROM: RONN EDWARDS Regional Planner SUBJECT: Review of Apache Junction Transportation Plan * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I have completed the review of the September, 1981 Transportation Plan for Apache Junction and have the following comments: (1 ) The plan does an adequate job of covering the basic elements of the transportation planning process. The plan promotes a balanced transportation system, addresses future transporta- tion needs, describes the existing system, considers safety conditions and discusses other modes of transportation including public transit, pedestrians, bicycles, horse trails, and air. (2) The plan does not address the elderly and handicapped. (3) One issue that you should be aware of that may create poten- tial conflict is the selection of arterial streets to be provided with an interchange along the Superstition Freeway. The Apache Junction plan suggests that interchanges be con- structed at Idaho and Tomahawk Roads as opposed to existing plans for interchanges at Ironwood and Tomahawk Roads. I would suggest that the District office and the Transportation Planning Division of the Arizona Department of Transportation be asked to submit comments on this issue. (4) Overall , the goals of the Apache Junction plan are compatible with those of the "Guide For Regional Development and Trans- portation." RONN EDWARDS t i 8-9590 2/75 (FORMERLY 8-954) CITY OF MESA `* :�=a ARIZONA uat., 2 3 1982 January 26, 1982 Mr. Joseph W. Gero Director of Planning City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Gero: I received your letter regarding your master plan. We did not receive the attachments referred to in the letter. I 'm reasonably confident that we would have had no criticism of your proposed plan, however, it might be ad- visable for us to have a copy of the final plan for our information and we would appreciate receiving a copy at the proper time. I would like to bring up a related topic at this time. In recent discussions regarding transportation, and par- ticularly the extension of the Superstition Freeway, it was the consensus here that since it would be quite some time before the Superstition Freeway were extended through to US 60, that it would be very advantageous to extend one of the other arterial streets to provide an alternate route to Apache Trail . It was the consensus of the group that we consider pushing Maricopa County to extend Baseline Road to County Line if we could get Pinal County to consider opening Baseline Road to the east. It was thought that Apache Junction might be in a position to best influence Pinal County Supervisors on this matter. We would appreciate your thoughts on this idea. Sincerely, J// `� DEAN SLOAN Public Works Manager DES:jls xc: Richard Broman, Public Works Director, Apache Junction ALL-1MLRK1 CITY CC �I/VCDTTI CrCF\TT:D CTART.`T m AlICT( TTCR TCV 1 h[:R to QC')/l1 a. I f')\ Q�ih Orl11 F :ONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA N OFFICE MEMO January 15, 1982 TO: ART AUERBACH Chief Regional Planner FROM: RONN EDWARDS Regional Planner SUBJECT: Review of Apache Junction Transportation Plan * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I have completed the review of the September, 1981 Transportation Plan for Apache Junction and have the following comments : (1 ) The plan does an adequate job of covering the basic elements of the transportation planning process. The plan promotes a balanced transportation system, addresses future transporta- tion needs, describes the existing system, considers safety conditions and discusses other modes of transportation including public transit, pedestrians , bicycles , horse trails, and air. (2) The plan does not address the elderly and handicapped. (3) One issue that you should be aware of that may create poten- tial conflict is the selection of arterial streets to be provided with an interchange along the Superstition Freeway. The Apache Junction plan suggests that interchanges be con- structed at Idaho and Tomahawk Roads as opposed to existing plans for interchanges at Ironwood and Tomahawk Roads. I would suggest that the District office and the Transportation Planning Division of the Arizona Department of Transportation be asked to submit comments on this issue. (4) Overall , the goals of the Apache Junction plan are compatible with those of the "Guide For Regional Development and Trans- portation. " RONN EDWARDS t 08-9590 2/75 (FORMERLY 8-934) Amok 1 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT c 2 1 1981 FIbOD cos Rotl ��,�isr s ►, of �• \ Maricopa County BOARD of DIRECTORS 1959 3335 West Durango Street • Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Tom Freestone, Chairman Telephone (602) 262-1501 Hawley Atkinson George L Campbell William D Mathews, P E , Chief Engineer and General Manager Fred Koory,Jr Ed Pastor DEC 171981 :L e y r' U k. e:- Ms. Mildred Baker, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 RE: Apache Junction General Plan Dear Ms. Baker: We have reviewed the proposed general plan for the City of Apache Junction as requested in your letter dated November 19, 1981 . The following are our comments. The District recommends that the City adopt a drainage ordinance that requires all future development to at least maintain if not improve existing drainage conditions. In order to achieve this with urbanized development, it will be necessary to implement onsite stormwater runoff retention. Without retention, the increased runoff rates and volumes brought by urbanization will ultimately cause existing downstream drainage facilities to become inadequate for the original design frequency. As development approaches the proposed Superstition Freeway and the Central Arizona Project aqueduct, adequate consideration should be given to the drainage design frequency of those structures versus the drainage design of the future development. This will be especially significant for those developments upslope of the freeway and aqueduct. We appreciate your coordination with us. We hope to continue working together in the future as Apache Junction grows. Sincerely, )/itdis... W. D. Mathews , P. E. cS/Ipache')uncliaa gar 4 cam. P.O.Box 1747 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 982-3141 January 19, 1982 Er,7 7, ri ° Mayor Wendell Clarke City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Az., 85220 Honorable Mayor Clarke: At a recent Board of Directors meeting of the Apache Junction Chamber of Coznmc'rce, Mr. Gero presented the future plats for growth and development of the Apache Junction area. After some discussion, it was determined that an orderly plan for growth and development is absolutely necessary —sand the plan as prepared b9 PRO Toups, a planning research Company of Phop?ix, Arizona and presented by Mr. Gero be adopted by the Apache Junction City Council. " cerely, J :rmf an Hiller, President Copy to fir. Gero 4pache Junction Chamber of Commerce cqalewal,to the,Supers ho/v l aunlaut& UNLESS THERE IS OBJECTION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL, WE WILL ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS AND LETTERS WITHOUT [HEIR FULL READING AS PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD . � PQACHF✓G l :F, f:tya1/r U :rl lt'• �i21 'ii -1Rizoo• 'Oily ,c4pache 09unction February 2, 1982 Copy No. MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 1-7 DAVID ALEXANDER, CITY ATTORNEY 9 RICHARD BROMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 10 ART ALLEN, CITY ENGINEER 11 BILL MCDANIEL, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY 12 JAMES GEIL, FIRE CHIEF 13 KATHY CONNELLY, ACTING CITY CLERK 14 CHUCK NEWCOMER, ASSOCIATE PLANNER 15 THROUGH- JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER`) 8 FROM: 1-&J JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 16 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE DRAFT Recently the City Council , through Acting City Manager Bill McDaniel , instructed the Department of Planning to develop a draft subdivision ordinance on a fast- track basis. Enclosed is a draft in compliance with your request. Because of the particular problem instigating the need for the ordinance, the staff has quickly reviewed other ordinances and previous staff comments on an earlier model . This is not a polished version and in the next week we expect to review this draft for polish. You are being asked to review this document for. 1) consistency 2) content 3) general form 4) grammar 5) community attitude and acceptance A developer who has indicated an urgent need to have the city's subdivision approval , has a target date of your council meeting of February 16th. Should you desire to assist the developer meet that goal , the staff encourages your comments to be returned no later than Tuesday, February 9, 1982. Attached for your convenience is a review form. I am requesting you mark your copies with specific comments and return them to me. If you have any questions, please contact the Department of Planning. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 "9/21(f2 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES • ITEM // MEETING OF PIT I ON BY. SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN FIDSON COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKSViz COUNCILMAN STFELSMITF COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICF MAYOR HII • ✓ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ark Opal Hansen has worked for the past 16 years as a volunteer member of the Apache Junction Library Association. She has devoted a great amount of time to establishing the Apache Junction Library and was instrumental in donating the library to the City. I would like to thank Mrs. Hansen, on behalf of our community, for never giving up and for trying so hard to enable us and our children to have the use of a local public library. ROLL C LL VOTE SHEET NOTES ��' Ski ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: cam;-k SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH t//: COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON 7 VICE_ MAYOR HILL _ MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ✓ ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET /c7� NOTES /22/10--ia'7; "Ze- i(r li4firr14° Ifi ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: c4<-7/2 SECONDED BY: ��02 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"^,OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 7/ ROLL CALL siol „bij ROLL CALL y� 5 I PRE NT 14 ABSENT MAYOR CIARKE ✓ I C VI CE-MAYOR, DILL ► ✓ ✓ 1 ✓ f COUNC I LMAN EIDSON I COUNCILMAN HUDSON i ✓ ✓ COUNCILMAN SHANKS ✓ ✓ COUNC I LMAN STEELSMITH V COUNC I LMAN DAMIANO TOTAL f ✓ ✓ STAFF PRESENT • CITY MANAGER ✓ CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES .m. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Joe Gero DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexander/Mr. Hirsch OTHER CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION n REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: � Wit9_ MICA✓`\ DATE. a &-$2- ADDRESS: 4{`72: gi . AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED CtmuLlaQ�lA^� CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION }f REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: �Q%�(/�/ � DATE: /2. ADDRESS: „9//y 6.4( f i AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DI CUSSED J CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: _ `t.-! DATE: r— - ?f ADDRESS. CJDoL 0 %.1) AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED ?—e-r,4,Let-a .-J CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: fIIV , 4ND/'EWS DATE: Z - 2 - Z- ADDRESS: I7 7S NO. LA /34.e.ce /?1? di AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED l 4 ) G AveeAL i AA/ CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: A-e.U,e, S/f G DATE: -2/ zi/ F 2 ADDRESS: 22 4 a 4. Mf',7 -'5 i AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED ej24,64jz._ CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: ct d DATE:��C �'1 I'' a a 1 ADDRESS: J f Co GJ Ua/L"Q" AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED e PeAft41._ CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: N 1/. �ti oat[.4a S DATE: 2 - 2 - S 2--- ADDRESS: /Jr'?X /(iO. �9 ',47,€6C Jea/4Q AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED a`' '"a d (3) ..dats AiZOS -/ g€s‘41'/V-77O.fj.S CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAIL: b/41 (1/447 e/1i'5-7-/ DATE: c0 c ADDRESS: , ,72 L /Oi AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED J, i ,'/ 740 /44.6 `Ice OM, - 1 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK , ti : Gi�� DATE: 2i/2��/7/ NAME: ;4 B �G ADDRESS: � IC / 2 /L/ AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED U CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAIL: DATE: -2,'2 ADDRESS: _s S'-C"C .41) /O AS- AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED - J -- CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE: 2_ 2- NAME: V�LLiv'U� � ADDRESS: 102G► 71 11 ai.6e4 P ,, t A /A' c2 AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED X ► V" !'5i'✓Le 4 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: ✓,/ 2DATE:4d-Z -- Q 9 S ADDRESS: OS/ w;‘, AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED f 4i-L/ CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION �rv� c1_ REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 'e,C�7 ‘ V UN 4 A W C)O DATE: Clot ` ADDRESS: L7S p<O 1� LY C%SC'�Vlu AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION / ( REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: C.jYYxd� /frt it//Crti DATE: .2-2- 32_ ADDRESS: -SJ4_1 A) // /)1 J -4eh � 1522a AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED li,t1 G4SC r Af CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK / NAME• EI. 1. fie AI ,bsJ ./L/1/ DATE: a(011gi0/ ADDRESS: 5' 35 g • /47-24/ iE. A9Ad-46--- `/ hver10nd AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED Ah-id At°0 PO S•E� Res �Ti o d 8 - a / 6EAf E,2l�L, 411 Ail) RISE /9 Mg Aa rkle-Arre5 '• CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: Dic/ //OG Utz J'IR. DATE: 0 - a- SI a ADDRESS: oxaa3 /v• pc_ 8/8n1 2 Are4 AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED GAA/,p Liss P49.6/ - 96 j • 8 a -o t jrra ,