The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982 04.20 City Council Regular Agenda Adb. woe. I( --ISCHF �I/��/��'�h�YF.Y � §Q4* 8 jr � "„,,�� 11 tL(-3 dYP i gR,ZONP c 'ity o. lache 02unction CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA APRIL 20, 1982 7 : 00 P.M. 6 : 00 P.M. WORK SESSION COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING 6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 6 , 1982 AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC .�� CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSES PERSON TRANSFER, PIZZA HOUSE OLD BUSINESS (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 136, BEAULIEU (Second Reading) (5) SPEED LIMIT ADJUSTMENTS - U.S. HIGHWAY 60 NEW BUSINESS (6) STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, RESOLUTION OF INTENT (7) URBAN BOUNDARIES (8) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-14 , STATE INVESTMENT POOL PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-15 , AUTHORIZATION TO INVEST CITY FUNDS 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 r A\ (9) AWARD OF BID - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT (10) AWARD OF BID - CHIP SEALING OF STREETS (11) AWARD OF BID - REFRIGERATION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING (12) SELECTION OF FIRM TO PERFORM CITY' S ANNUAL AUDIT (13) ESTABLISHMENT OF REVIEW PERIOD FOR CITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDE (14) ESTABLISHMENT OF REVIEW PERIOD FOR SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY INSTALLATION IN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY (15) CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FROM INSURANCE CONSULTANTS (16) APPOINTMENTS TO AD-HOC COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS LICENSE STUDY (17) WORK SESSION AND EXECUTIVE SESSION, MAY 4 , 1982 (18) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (19) ADJOURNMENT THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / i A // ITEM # MEETING OF U:d 7/-- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON j M i . S VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO v _MAYOR CLA.RKE v _ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V UNANI�".O , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 7 SZ -BLS PQAC�F�G,y eNN 'IRIZONP �it o ace 09unction � p CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA APRIL 20, 1982 7 : 00 P.M. 6 : 00 P.M. WORK SESSION COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING 6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 6 , 1982 AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND CONMUNICATIONS /2,& 4 // CALL TO THE PUBLIC .�t�✓�r�raev� CITY MANAGER' S REPORT / G95,rc/ C 7cs4QytS' PUBLIC HEARINGS III /04_1 (� (3) APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSEp PERSON TRANSFER, PIZZA HOUSE - o(62e- ? nL ei/y) OLD BUSINESS 1 � QJ� (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 136, BEAULIEU (Second Reading) (5) SPEED LIMIT ADJUSTMENTS - U.S. HIGHWAY 60 NEW BUSINESS 0 (6) STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, RESOLUTION OF INTENT (7) URBAN BOUNDARIES (8) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-14 , STATE INVESTMENT POOL PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-15 , AUTHORIZATION TO INVEST CITY FUNDS 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 _0 (9) AWARD OF BID — DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT (i ' (10) AWARD OF BID — CHIP SEALING OF STREETS n0 ,(11) AWARD OF BID — REFRIGERATION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 07/(12) SELECTION OF FIRM TO PERFORM CITY ' S ANNUAL AUDIT (13) ESTABLISHMENT OF REVIEW PERIOD FOR CITY DEVELOPMENT P/ GUIDE (14) ESTABLISHMENT OF REVIEW PERIOD FOR SPECIAL PROVISIONS P FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY INSTALLATION IN PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY (15) CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FROM INSURANCE CONSULTANTS 0/(16) STUDYNTMENTS TO AD—HOC COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS LICENSE (17) WORK SESSION AND EXECUTIVE SESSION, MAY 4 , 1982 (18) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (19) ADJOURNMENT THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS. \\\ ITEM NO . 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED,` CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 6, 1982 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache �.� Junction, Arizona, was held on April 6, 1982, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Councilman Eidson led the Invocation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Steelsmith led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Hill Mayor Clarke Staff Present• City Manager, James Tuvell City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Public Works, Rich Broman Director of Planning, Joe Gero City Attorney, Arnold Hirsch Others Present Mr Bob C Henry, 1st Vice President Lion's Club 9501 E. Broadway Mesa, Arizona Mr. Dick Rabidue 575 W. 23rd Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Bill Beaulieu 306 E. Frontier Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Ironwood Mobile Court 1280 N. Ironwood Drive Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr Donald Rehder 275 N. Saguaro Drive Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA Vice Mayor Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 16, 1982 ) ) Vice Mayor Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 16, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Clarke addressed the Council with the following "Several meetings ago, the Lion's Club contacted the City Manager about placing a tree on the City Complex in conjunction with a world- wide program. On March 25th, with numerous citizens, public officials, press and City staff present, a live evergreen tree was planted at the front of the administration building. The Council, staff, and City residents would like to express our sincere appreciation for giving our community something that will be admired and enjoyed for many years to come " Mayor Clarke presented a Certificate of Appreciation to the Lion's Club Mr. Bob Henry, First Vice President and President-Elect, of the Lion's Club, accepted the Certificate, expressing the Club's desire to assist in any way possible to better the community CALL TO THE PUBLIC Mr. Dick Rabidue, 575 W 23rd Avenue, Apache Junction, Arizona, presented the Council with a progress report on the Veteran's Memorial Park Mr Rabidue informed the public that the Veteran's Memorial Park will not be owned by the City, but will belong to the people, and expressed appreciation to Councilman Damiano who initiated the idea of a Park CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager James Tuvell , called on the Director of Public Works, Rich Broman to report on the street paving progress. Direction of Public Works Rich Broman, reported on the streets that have been completed, announcing that Idaho Road and 16th Avenue are the next streets to be paved Director of Planning Joe Gero, stated that the City Council had requested an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance that a condition precedent to rezonings would be the applicant's dedication of rights-of-way if the rezoning is on a street approved plan. He provided the Council with a copy of a proposed ordinance to this effect, and commented that it will be on the agenda for consideration at a future Council meeting REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE TWO Air PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 136, BEAULIEU Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Gero, briefed the Council on the .�. rezoning application from General Rural (GR) to CB2 General Business. Mr. Bill Beaulieu, 306 E. Frontier, Apache Junction, Arizona, explained that the purpose of this rezoning is to build a western style shopping center, and requested approved. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. Mr. Gero stated that the applicant has offered to the City the dedication of the initial right-of-way, and the City is in possession of a quit claim deed to the latter, and that the Planning and Zoning Commission has no objection to the application. There being no one else wishing to address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 136, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, read as follows• ORDINANCE NO. 136, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE PERSON TRANSFER, LA CASA DE TORO ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION BE TABLED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE, FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES #3850 Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE THREE Ask Councilman Steel smith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE: In Favor Mayor Clarke, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Hill ift% Abstained. Councilman Damiano, Councilman Shanks (Conflict of Interest, The motion carried APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, IRONWOOD MOBILE COURT ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mr. Harold Holley, 1280 N. Ironwood, Apache Junction, Arizona, asked if there were any questions regarding this application. Councilman Damiano asked if these games would be limited to residents of Ironwood Mobile Court Mr. Holley replied that they would Vice Mayor Hill questioned again whether or not only residents would be allowed to participate. Mr Holley stated that generally there would only be residents involved in the games with occasional guests. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY THE IRONWOOD MOBILE COURT, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE In Favor. Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Eidson, Mayor Clarke Opposed: Vice Mayor Hill The motion carried. APPLICATION FOR SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SAGUARO MOBILE RESORT ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Mr Donald Rehder, 275 N Saguaro Drive, Apache Junction, Arizona, informed the Council that this license will be used for residents of Saguaro Mobile Resort only. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE FOUR 41111. Am. Councilman Damiano stated that the parking is limited in the park and questioned whether participants would be only residents. Mr Rehder reiterated that the participants would be residents only and perhaps a few guests. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the or. application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY THE SAGUARO MOBILE RESORT, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY Councilman Damiano seconded the motion Vice Mayor Hill questioned that the City can insure that participants to bingo games in mobile home parks be limited to residents, and expressed his opinion that this could very easily cause a safety hazard. VOTE: In Favor Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Eidson, Mayor Clarke Opposed Vice Mayor Hill The motion carried OLD BUSINESS STREET PROGRAM Director of Public Works Rich Broman, addressed the Council with two options for repairing Apache Junction streets. Mr. Broman stated that the options would include a combination of in-house reconstruction and partially contracted AdoIlk chip-sealing Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH ROAD PROJECTS IN A MIX OF IN-HOUSE RECONSTRUCTION, CONTACTED CHIP-SEAL AND IN-HOUSE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PAVEMENT THE TOTAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO BE SPENT WILL BE NOT MORE THAN $255,000.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSFER NECESSARY FUNDS FROM THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS TO THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS TO COVER THE COST OF SAID PAVING IMPROVEMENTS Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion Mayor Clarke $255,000.00 be stretched as far as possible. requested that the VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE FIVE NEW BUSINESS CITY PHYSICIAN City Manager James Tuvell , informed the Council that the Arizona Revised Statutes § 9-271 requires the City to appoint a City Physician. Mr. Tuvell requested authorization to contact all physicians within the City, in the attempt to discover whether there is an interest in this position, and to have the Council make a selection at a later date. Alimk Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTACT ALL PHYSICIANS PRACTICING WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE APPOINTMENT OF A CITY PHYSICIAN. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. CITY BOARD OF HEALTH AND CITY HEALTH OFFICERS Mr Tuvell stated that according to the Arizona Revised Statutes, the City is obligated to appoint health officers and a board of health, which would be composed of two members of the City Council , the City Engineer and the City Health Officer, requesting that the City Council give authorization to prepare a list of potential members to be considered at a later date. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE THE CITY COUNCIL WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CITY BOARD OF HEALTH AND CITY HEALTH OFFICER FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AND APPOINTMENT Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried ACCEPTANCE OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, SUNNY LANE ESTATES ) Director of Planning Joe Gero, informed the Council that improvements on the Sunny Lane Estates have been completed and inspected, and the City Engineer recommends approval and acceptance of these improvements with a warranty of one year Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THOSE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR SUNNY LANE ESTATES PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PZ-2-82)/SUBDIVISION (SD-1-82) ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BEING FOUND BY THE CITY ENGINEER TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ARE ACCEPTED INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM SUBJECT TO THE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE SIX FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, SUNNY LANE ESTATES Mr. Gero stated that this application is a request for subdivision final plat approval , the preliminary of which was approved on March 17, 1982 by the Subdivision Committee, and the final plat was reviewed and recommended for approval on March 25, 1982, by the Subdivision Committee. Mr. Gero requested that this i application be approved subject to submission of all remaining materials for staff review prior to April 2, 1982, which shall be found accurate Ain►.. and complete prior to the City Council meeting of April 6, 1982. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE SUNNY LANE ESTATES SUBDIVISION BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE DECLARATIONS AND COVENANTS BEING SUBMITTED IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN Mr Tuvell informed the Council that the City must submit an Affirmative Action Plan to the Bureau of Land Management to be included with the application for land for parks and recreational purposes Mr Tuvell stated that this plan has been City policy but has never been formally adopted by the City Council. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PRESENTED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, BE AND HEREBY IS, ADOPTED AND APPROVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried CITY CREDIT UNION MEMBERSHIP City Manager James Tuvell, addressed the Council regarding a credit union which exists between several cities including Tempe, Chandler, Mesa, Phoenix and Scottsdale, and requested authorization from the Council to pursue membership in the credit union for the City of Apache Junction. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH INVESTIGATING THE POSSIBILITY OF CITY MEMBERSHIP IN A CREDIT UNION. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. REAPPOINTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEMBERS Mayor Clarke stated that three members of the Parks and Recreation Commission, whose terms have expired and wish to REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE SEVEN remain on the Commission. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PHIL RICHARDSON, JANICE PALSON, AND RONALD STAPLES, BE REAPPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE APRIL 30, 1985. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion ,^ VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. WORK SESSION, APRIL 15, 1982 Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT THE CITY HALL COMPLEX ON APRIL 15, 1982, AT 7:00 P.M. FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 1982-83 BUDGET. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION AND AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL COMPLEX OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON APRIL 20, 1982, AT 6:00 P.M. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON APRIL 27, 1982, AT 7:00 P.M AT THE CITY HALL COMPLEX FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING CHARTER GOVERNMENT. Councilman Shanks seconded the motion VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Councilman Shanks reported that the three members of the Parks and Recreation Commission that were reappointed are very hard working. Councilman Steelsmith stated that many problems were resolved at the joint Work Session of the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission Vice Mayor Hill expressed his appreciation for the street repairs that have been completed REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE SEVEN Councilman Damiano reminded the public of the fact that the Veteran's Memorial Park is not owned by the City, and urged more participation in the Park Councilman Damiano informed the Council and public that the rehearing on the Airspace application, is scheduled for April 26, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., at the Apache Junction High School auditorium Councilman Damiano also reported a meeting for East Valley Chamber of Commerce members only for April 30, 1982, regarding human needs and operations at Williams Air Force Base Mayor Clarke commented on street repair progress, and expressed the hope that planned repairs will be completed by July 1, 1982. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Mayor Clarke stated, "For the last few weeks I have been studying the issue of the proposed airport for Apache Junction I have reeked out people from all walks of life. Clerks, Doctors, Construction workers, Attorneys, Retired, Businessmen, Bankers. I talked to them and I listened to them The proposed airport is a strong issue The proposed airport is a controversial issue. It is an issue that must be recognized for what it is. What I say and do this evening, I do with a clear conscience and with the strong determination that the progress of our City shall continue on a positive and orderly path, with the united support of all citizens of Apache Junction. For any Council member to do less, would be ignoring the oath of office and disrespecting the confidence placed on us by our friends and neighbors " Mayor Clarke MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE DECISION TO BUILD A MUNICIPAL AIRPORT BE DECIDED BY PLACING IT AS A PROPOSITION ON THE BALLOT IN THE NEXT GENERAL CITY ELECTION IN APACHE JUNCTION ` FURTHERMORE, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE TO STUDY THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF AN AIRPORT l AND FURTHERMORE, THAT THE COUNCIL, THE CITY MANAGER AND HIS STAFF BE DIRECTED TO PARTICIPATE AND COOPERATE WITH ALL AGENCIES, LOCAL, COUNTY AND STATE IN AIR TRAFFIC STUDIES, KEEPING IN MIND THE PRACTICAL SAFETY FACTORS AND GOOD NEIGHBOR POLICIES WITH OTHER CITIES AND WILLIAMS AIR FORCE BASE. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the Amok motion. Councilman Steelsmith expressed his agreement with the question of the proposed airport being placed on the ballot. Councilman Damiano stated that he was not in complete agreement with some things the Airport Commission has presented. Councilman Shanks stated that she had said as a member of the previous Council that this issue should be on the election ballot, and will stand behind that previous statement. Mayor Clarke stated that the City has had it's share of trouble and travesty and this issue should be decided by the people. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8 03 P.M. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE EIGHT Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACH JUNCTION, ARIZONA. Amok WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk t REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE NINE ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: a) SECONDED n BY : ( 1 YES NO ABSTAINED E MAYOR HILL NCILMAN. STEELSMITH / 1 NC I LMAN HUDSON NCILMAN EIDSON YOR CLARKE OUNCILMAN DiMIANO 111.111111111111111111111 UNANMUS IN FAVOP OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , 4. AlOhlk CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION REQUEST TO SPEAK NAME: 7 / , .i / DATE.9/094:jc /9 I __ ADDRESS: kV\ . � AGENDA ITEM OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED 2j/ diQrn t tr., 0 -K-, `vv.i k;v-,G, /�,° C, . o'lM)i/►^a-uev. PUBLIC HEARING C • 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF LIQUOR •� LICENSE APPLICATION THE APPLICANT IS PIZZA HOUSE 2, IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME, 3. ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, -sue s ( ll 4,441/ /' COS,--4-67 (�irX n�:spo) a o � � o cs�.nio . r f/V PQACHE✓ qP/ZOWx city o .?Jackie &unction April 13 , 1982 .*, MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT - - - TRANSFER OF LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION, PIZZA HOUSE In Accordance with the procedures for processing applications for liquor licenses , notice was posted on the premises at 1200 W. Apache Trail , Apache Junction, Arizona, on the 30th day of March , 1982 , by the City Clerk. The notice remained posted for twenty (20) days , during which time written arguments in favor of or in objection to the proposed license were to be filed with the City Clerk. As of this date, there have been no objections addressed to the City on this matter. Corres- pondence has been received from the Director of Public Safety and the Director of Public Works , a copy of which is attached. The next step in the procedure is for the Council to hold a hearing on the application and make recommendation for approval or disapproval to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control . _,-2-&_e62--, (7,L.,,,,d4 Kathleen Connelly City Clerk lvc Approver for Agenda _ ___..—, //Dato Item # F::�; , ;ding j f; ._ ....._, Attachments Secoid Reading __ t. r'ubl.c Hearing _ :d Business New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 PQACHF✓o :. ,,,I, '` "-'C DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY o a ,lt,iftf,4441.4.. i' "',;Ill z '9R/ZONP (6 ity o ' pacre 2unCtion WE McDANIEL f\ April 5, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk FROM: Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Liquor License Person Transfer Pizza House The Department of Public Safety has no objection to the person transfer of this liquor license. ES/djl 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD.•POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 iti of C pac/ze 09unctian INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: April 1 , 1982 (N TO: City Clerk THRU: Director of Public Works k_ fL FROM: City Enginee SUBJECT: Liquor License Person Transfer - Pizza House - We see no changes in access , parking , etc . caused by this action. Therefore , we have NO objection to this transfer . AMA/sh STATE OF ARIZONA, DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Date of Posting: March 30 , 1982 Applicant: Mr. John C. Batte Address of Premises: 1200 West Apache Trail Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 License(s) Applied for:Person Transfer of Series 7 Liquor License • I hereby certify that pursuant to Section 4-201, A.R.S., I did post notice in a conspicuous place on the premises concerning the above liquor license(s) and said notice shall remain posted for a period of at least 20 consecutive days. Signature of City/County Clerk or Representative: City Clerk Dated: March 30 , 1982 Return this affidavit with your recommendation and any related petitions to: Department of Liquor Licenses and Control 1645 West Jefferson, Suite 227 Phoenix, AZ 85007 *For text of Section 4-201, A.R.S., please see reverse. REV 8/81 FORM 128 ellik 441111101 FOR REV2/01 -D L L C USE ONLY- /e STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND I.ON I ItUI 1645 WEST JEFFERSON SUITE 227 PHOENIX AZ 85007 '\%_ I L1I ')R DCPT 602/255 5141 F'AR 17 4 �2 FI.1 '81 APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE Type or print with black ink NOTE PROCESSING OF MOST APPLICATIONS TAKES G0 DAYS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OFTEN RESULT IN A LONGER WAIT INC, PERIOD I IIEHE10ln YOU ARE CAUTIONED REGARDING EXTENSIVE FINANCIAL COMMIT MINTS PI ANS FOR A GRAND OPENING ETC. BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUAN(I OF DIE LICENSE 11 SECTION 1 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A All ACH A(CLIS IX COPY OF CHECK WO ETC ❑ '✓NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 14 15 Reviewed by .' 1 ATccepled by b T- . PERSON TRANSFER Complete Sections 2 3 4,5,9,14,1. Current file flagged by , 1 ❑LOCATION TRANSFER Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 10 14 15 Copies made for posting by i 0 NEW AGENT FOR CORP OR CLUB Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 11 14 15 Copies mailed for posting by Date ❑PROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 12 14 15)fee not required) Copies for background by. Date_ ❑GOVERNMENT LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Comments SECTION 2 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP 0' P 103(o REF DATA 0 INDIVIDUAL Complete Section 7 ❑CLUB Complete Section CLAIM• T R • T Ft DATE CODE AMT ❑PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 7 0 GOVERNMENT CORPORATION Complete Section 8 0 OTHER expiate. ad A y SECTION 3 APPLICANT (AII applicants must complete this Section) --� 1 APPLICANT'S OR AGENT'S NAME 4,9 7 7,C d h tJ/ (Insert one name only-to appear on License) Last Name First Name Middle 2 CORPORATION OH PARTNERSHIP NAME e.,,L .�A/i,gSTJyrh)T _ive•, ) Enter exact name as it appears on Articles of Inc or Partnership Agreement 3 BUSINESS NAME Pi 2?A )JC1 l;sr //--!! Enter exact name as it appears on the eeexterior of premises 4 BUSINESS ADDRESS I.2_oo (L.1 i9 pi90 E R.- -1--Doo not use P O Box Number Gt 5. CITY ,9O)l�� 4( I COUNTY pj�J3 1 ZIP CODE O�T;Iml- 6. MAILING ADDRESS. soj J)-),P CITY A)i L,,£ --72:T STATE OZ., ZIP CODE Kc 7-2-c ST 7 IS THE BUSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OE THE ABOVE CITY OR TOWN 3(7 VES 0 NO SECTION 4 INDICATE LICENSE SERIES Check only one use separate form for each license i°1111111N NEW LICENSE FEES Total Due if Filed' Total Due if Filed Person to Person ,0catroi SERIES Nov 1 May 15 May 16 Oct 31 Transfer Fee Annual Renewal Transfer F 0 1 DISTILLERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1 900.00 1,725.00 550.00 350.00 150.00 ❑2 BREWERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1 900.00 1 725.00 550.00 350.00 150.00 ❑3 VINTNERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1 700.00 1,625.00 350.00 150.00 150.00 • .,. ❑4 WHOLESALER ALL LIQUORS 1,800.00 i 1 675.00 550.00 250.00 150.00 ❑5 WHOLESALER WINE AND BEER 1,650.00 1,600.00 250.00 100.00 150.0C ❑6 ON-SALE RETAILER ALL LIQUORS 1 700.00 I 1,650.00 350.00 150.00 150.00 x7 ON-SALE RETAILER WINE AND BEER 425.00 I 387 50 200.0 s 75.00 150.0C ❑a ON-SALE RETAILER BEER 275.00 262.50 100.00 25.00 150.0( ❑9 OFF-SALE RETAILER,ALL LIQUORS 1 100.00 I 1,050.00 150.00 50.00 150.0( ❑10 OFF SALE RETAILER WINE AND BEER 400.00 I 375.00 150.00 50.00 150.0( ❑11 OFF SALE RETAILER BEER 275.00 262 50 100.00 25.0) 150.0f ❑12 RAILROAD TRAIN LICENSE 1.775.00 ( 1,662.50 500.00 225.00 150.01 0 13 AIRLINE LICENSE 1,775.00 1,66250 500.00 225.00 1500 0 14 PRIVATE CLUB LICENSE 1 200.00 1 125.00 150.00 150.0 ❑15 HOTEL/MOTEL LICENSE Complete Section 6 2,050.00 1800.00 • 500.00 ❑16 RESTAURANT LICENSE Complete Section 6 2,050.00 I 1,800.00 500.00 • ❑17G GOVERNMENT LICENSE 250.00 200.00 • 100.00 • ❑171 DISTILLERS LICENSE(OUT OF-STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 ❑18 BREWERS LICENSE(OUT OF-STATE) 300.00 I 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 ❑19 VINTNERS LICENSE(OUT OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 ❑20 IMPORTER EXPORTER OR RECTIFIER 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 Not Permitted DLLC USE ONLY PI #. _ FEES APP LIC FEE AGT CHG MFG CLOG TOTS t• .t SECTION 5. QUESTIONS FOR ALL APPLICANTS / 1 Do local zoning laws permit the stale of alcoholic beverages at the location you seek to license,l.,--YES ONO 2. Distance to the nearest church .)'1�) IT Name/address of church. .5/,L`/1/17 l'jh'it) f227.411l1j. 'J1 Y- Eivu Z.'YL'f 3 Distance to the nearest school ;1L-'L10 Name/address of school ,p,1.0 ..iJ' J-111"/Vh"�11J'l3 k'J .12agl y rimiY(l. 4 Are you the DOWNER T`LESSEE ❑SUBLESSEE ❑PURCHASER of the premises. 5. If the premises is leased give name and address of lessor 1.Iiw..l /,1NA[2 L. Name Address City State Zip 6 What date was lease/sublease signed: ' 7 z;- F() Term of lease is X %Q S years 7 Does the lease include provision to retransfer the liquor license back to the lessor at termination OYES EINO 8. Has a license,or transfer of license for the premises represented herein been denied by the State within the past sixty months OYES C5140 If yes attach an explanation IZ 9 Who will manage this business. <l y)T Tl- - C Last Name First Name Middle Each manager,other than owner Is) must complete Form 134 and submit an 'applicant fingerprint card 10 Does any alcoholic beverage manufacturer wholesaler or employee thereof have any interest in your business ❑YESlO 11 Is the premises licensed with a license other than the one for which you are applying OYES , NO If so give license No. / bcensee•lexactly as it appears on License) Last Name First Name Middle 12 What is your Arizona State Sales Tax(Privilege)License No J.)1'4/ SI (2 13. Do you understand that a portion of the fees,such as Application Fee($50.00)and Interim Permit Fee(if applicable)is not refundable OYES ONO SECTION 6 FOR SERIES 15 OR 16 APPLICANTS 1 Is there a valid Series 15 or 16 license currently issued at the proposed location.OYES ❑NO If so enter licensee's name exactly as it appears on Iicer License No. / / / / / I Last Name First Name Middle NOTE: If the answer to question 1 above is 'yes you may qualify for an Interim Permit to operate while your application is pending Consult Section 4 203.01, A.R S., complete a Form 176 attach appropriate fee attach the current license,and submit with this application 2 What percentage of your gross sales represents the purchase of"meals" 3 How much of your floor space is designed for restaurant dining(sq ft) Seating capacity for dining purposes 4 Have you attached a copy of your menu that includes prices.OYES ONO (If not explain) SECTION 7 INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP OWNERS 1 Answer the following questions (If applicants are married answer each question for both husband and wife) Percentage Owned Last Name First Name Middle by each person Residence Address City State Z Applicant(enter here and in section 3) Partner for Spouse) Partner Partner N m Attach additional sheet if necessary W EACH ERSQF.LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND AN"APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD AO"kk 2. Is eacILpersor sted above a bona fide resident of Arizona.OYES ONO 3 Is any pprson-ther than the above going to share in the profits/losses of the business OYES ONO SECTION 8 CORPORATION OR CLUB APPLICANTS _ ac 1 Name of corporation or club. �9 C . i/1'P z; Y 6 l\) (Enter exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc or Club Charter) 2. Date incorporated or chartered /iA/2_ S 1 477 State where incorporated 4- 3 Arizona Corporation Commission File No /13.)l) •L r a I Date authorized to do business in Arizona• /91RP• . 7 4. Is corporation or club nonprofit OYES AtO If so give I R S tax exempt No 5. If a club refer to Section 4 101 4,A.R.S. and enter the subparagraph under which you are applying 6. List officers and directors. Last Name First Name Middle Title Residence Address City State 2 /344-17 Tll C. l J�l'i�tJ1,i j17f j ./"Pvem,t /)/fkC KI•(Au /L I(f?/* (') C I t'-t', /7r/! tel no..,_.r tit, rt..r/-s .rJbf biz-4 Attach additional sheet if necessary 7 List stockholders owning 10%or more EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND SUBMIT AN APPLICANT' TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD Last Name First Name Middle Percentage owned Residence Address City/State/Zi. .)C HA- ( 1( /•'oo PAep'f beim / izHp._1.cT,_ 3 7 r , (CK.f k'/`I/I f- A (/1'//n .7 S. /7✓ ! [/1 ot4A'A ,i le -!c[/lF S,7/CK�7 /1/fl '/Om- (s',- L. ,)S /7•/ c[a n..r&L',4 L� / 7 E71//F es-118. If this corp is owned by another corp.,attach an ownership,officer/director disclosure for the parent corporation Attach additional sheets as necessary /OS kar SECTION 9 PERSON TO PERSON TRANSFER QUESTIONS TO BE COMPLETED'BY CURRENT LICENSEE. 1 Current licensee: ,J/KXL AT'/I-M 3lL jj C_ Entity Exactly as it appears on license Last Name First Name Middle Etal, gt,etc 2 Corporate name. ("#G If current license is in the name of a corporation,enter exactly as it appears on license 3 Current business name P/Z2ae )1e)eSL Exactly as it appears on license 4 Current business address. Jare30 l LI .9 P.3C))L TZ County P./144• /�p,`7j J Exactly as it appearson license � City hr TTG_/ �}a ZIP CODE 5. License Series: 7 License Number.C)/7/IT///.e //1/3/L Date of last renewal. /—COe 6. Have you complied with the Uniform Commercial Code concerning bulk sale transfers$YES ONO If not attach an explanation 7 Have all creditors lien holders interest holders etc been notified of this transfer. ,ES ONO 8. Does the applicant intend to operate the business while this application is pending•..0,Y ES ONO If so complete Form 176 attach appropriate fee attach current license and submit with this application(for Series 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 or 13 only) 9 To be completed by the CURRENT LICENSEE I HEREBY RELINQUISH MY RIGHTS TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LICENSE TO THE APPLICANT NAMED HEREIN AND HEREBI SE AND SAY T(Id, T THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS SEr_1(3N ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE (, /C' kg( STATip OF Signature of current licensee- Date signed COUNTY e_ SUBSCRIBki AND SWOR TO before me this /� day of `70 re-/. 19 80: • pp^^,�,, ll )),,77 '' Sign t/lr[� . ^' Y x]U IL ')11 My QbmmZltbn expires on 6*('/ J/,/%("sue ure of NOTARY PUBLIC SECTION 10 LOCATION TO LOCATION TRANSFER QUESTIONS (Does not apply to Series 15 16 or 17G) APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT IS FINALLY APPROVED BY THE STATE 1 Current business address. County. Exactly as it appears on license City ZIP Code. 2 Current business name Exactly as it appears on license 3 New business address County Also enter in Section 3 Do not use P O Box Number City ZIP Code 4 New business name Also enter in Section 3 5. License Series. License Number / / / / / / / Date of last renewal 6. What date do you plan to move. Date of planned opening. FEE=$100 (Refer to Section 4-209.H ARS, SECTION 11 APPOINTMENT OF NEW AGENT FOR CORPORATION OR CLUB LICENSE for multiple agent change fees) 1 Current Agent's name Exactly as it appears on license Last Name First Name Middle 2 New Agent s name Also enter in Section 3 Last Name First Name Middle 3 License Series. License number. / / / / / / / Date of last renewal 4 Does this transaction involve the sale of any portion of the corporate stock OYES ONO If so Complete Section 8 5 To be completed by a CORPORATE OFFICER 1 HEREBY CONSENT TO THE AGENT APPOINTMENT Printed Name of Corporate Officer • NAMED HEREIN AND AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY ASSIGN A NEW AGENT IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH RESIGNAT OR DISCHARGE OF THIS AGENT I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE BACKGROUND REPORT SHOWS THAT I THE CORPORP OR ANY OFFICER DIRECTOR OR STOCKHOLDER HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS OR A aOR VIOLATION IN THE PAST YEAR I WILL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER THE LICENSE TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL AND HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO APPEAL SUCH ACTION STATE OF Signature of corporate/club officer COUNTY OF SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of 19_ My Commission expires on Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC SECTION 12 PROBATE OR WILL ASSIGNMENT OF AN EXISTING LICENSE(Does not apply to corporations) 1 Current licensees name (Exactly as it appears on licensel Last Name First Name Middle 2 Assignees name: • (Also enter in Section 3) Last Name First Name Middle 3 License Series- License number / / / ! / / Date of last renewal 4 Attach a certified copy of the will or probate distribution instrument that specifically distributes the liquor license to the assignee SECTION 13 GOVERNMENT LICENSE Ifor cities towns or counties only) 1 Person to administer this license (Also enter in Section 3) Last Name First Name Middle • 2 Applicant. Attach respective governing body's authorization Name of City Town or County • 3 Have you answered ALL questions in Section 3 including the location to tie licensed OYES ONO • 4 Do you understand that you can only serve alcoholic beverages for consumption on the licensed premises.OYES ONO 5 Will a concessionaire be using this license OYES ONO If so attach the agreement anti appropriate authorizations required by Section 4 205.03 A.R S • 6 Do you understand a separate license must be obtained for each premises from which alcoholic beverages are to be served ❑YES ❑NO SECTION 14 DIAGRAM OF PREMISES(Diagram must be on this form blueprints not accepted) 1 SHOW ONLY THE AREA TO BE COVERED BY THIS LICENSE INCLUDE ALL ENTRANCES/EXITS DRIVE IN WINDOWS SERVICE WINDO• LIQUOR STORAGE AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OR SQUARE FOOTAGE FIGURES DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS,LIVING QUARTERS E SERIES 15 AND SERIES 16 APPLICANTS MUST EXPLICITLY DEPICT KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND DINING FACILITIES DID) ) l L.F tv = N cfl r � - oc AIN 2 Do••u agree to notify the Department of any changes of boundaries entrances exits or service windows prior to modificationES ONO 3. Th ove;iagram is Ale only ar here alcoholic beverages are to be sold served consumed dispensed,possessed or stored i rk ti Ili Si. +cure o1 applicant/agent SECTION 15 SIGNATURE BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS STATE OF 6RIZONA 1 ss • COUNTY OF 11r2!!•Cet�(JO 1 I• _ BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OA Printed Name of Applicant or Aging J Liep in Clubl HEREBY DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT III I AM THE APPLICANT TOR AGENT APPLICANT IS A CORPORATION/CLUB), MAKING THE FOREGOING APPLICATION (21 THAT SAID APPLICATION HAS BEEN READ A THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE 131 TH THIS APPLICATION IS NOT BEING MADE TO DEFRAUD OR INJURE ANY CREDITOR TAXING AUTHORITY REGULATO AUTHORITY OR TRANSFEROR (41 THAT NO OTHER PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREIN HAS INTEREST IN THE SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WHICH THESE STATEMENTS ARE MADE 15) AND THAT NONE OF T OWNERS, PARTNERS OFFICERS DIRECTORS OR STOCKH 1 DERS LISTED HEREIN HAV EEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN T PAST FIVE YEARS OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION IN THE PAST EAf 17, Signature ` SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE ANU SWORN TO beloie me this cr clay of J'O4lr1__ 191 / - J ^ JSignature of NO AR PUB(IL ll J My u•Canmiss n expires on rY Farrrt 1 20A —D.L.L.C.USE ONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA t '(` i DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AN I)(ON'1 ROI , 1645 WEST JEFFERSON SUITE 227 fl'Q I' ?� IUZ PHOENIX,AZ 85007 Pii 602/255 5141 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER, PAR l'NFR, STO(1Q101 DER (10% Ott MORE) AND MANAGER ALSO EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN "APPLICANT TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, WIIICII MAY BE ell OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT ACENCY READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT. i ,l..0`; Q T F G 1 Name: .7 Z ^7;9)9i f Date of birth (I "r . -.25 Last ��)) First cddle Month day,year 2 Business Name• P)2-2—)9 /YCDL,6.a, Place of birth./=T,?,Q)7"n Se �JJG)-- 1-�7^ (As it appears iction 3 of Form 120) City State /off 3 Business address. V L.l )) _ ) a )4)7}1)�-E .77-J EA j , IDo not use P O Box number) City County Zip Code 4 Drivers license No 1 )2)-TO J Height f i g ') Weight. l7Q Eye color.62J)f' Hair color.�J,.l7� . a State 5 Name of spouse Date of birth. First Middle Last Maiden /*7 6 Of whet state are you a bona fide resident „9- .2__ If Arizona date of residency. �y/1 7 Indicate Your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state. Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed or Business (Give Street Address,City State and Zip Code) A DATES fiLY>PE 1i m 7-3.J? )4e LI'S)� Present Position or business engaged O-75_ ,?CJ � dv2 '/)V J? ..i in Pfi%)-F_ ri 7— .n- B DATES Position held or business engaged in immediately preceding above(A) C DATES Position held or business engaged in immediately preceding above(8) ^ Attach additional sheet if necessary 8 Indicate where you have resided for the last five years: FROM TO RESIDENCE Month Year Month Year Street City State Zip Code 7i3 POD L.0 j).,P,Alli j)2 /I IV?iIf .7>3— d 2 fc-s Attach additional sheet if necessary 9 How many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto V 10. Give Telephone Numbers for Zl6-,2.-3)t 9*.2.- 7 3"S-51 Business Resitience 11 Have you ever been detained cited arrested indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor violations OYES 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been lined imprisoned had sentence suspended or placed on probation for violation of any law or ordinance OYES t 13 Have you ever had a business professional or liquor license relected,denied,revoked suspended or fined in this or any other state OYES Ali 14 Have you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license rejected or denied OYES 1( 15 Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a lodgment against you in any civil nctinn the subtecl of which involved fraud or misrepresentation of a liquor related matter OYES `QI NI ir 16 If any answer to Questions 9 through 15 is YES Idtach a signet statement giviinl complete details `� 17 Are you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations /`71OVES OF, 18 Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales IPrivilegel Tax Account and your city permit fees lit applicable)current ,AS On 19 Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of any proposed change of lousiness name prior to making any such changes ,ES ON 20 Do you agree to post the permit or license if issued in I cunspicious Flier,on till primroses and within view of the general public .YES ON 21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine and leer supplies only Ii nut hcunsesl Arizona wholesalers ,` YES ON 22 Do you agree to keep all records invoices and other documents relating to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a period of two years and to have them easily accessible for examin;uionES On 20 Do you consent for the duration of the permit or license if issued to the entr after, ntspw:hum and search by any law enforcement official without a warrant or other process of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of �" the State Liquor Laws Regulations,and Board Directives /oIYES ON 24 Do you consent to an rnvesbgation of your background including all records of every kind and description including police records and to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and any other individual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control t �VES ON 25 If any answer to Questions 17 through 24 is 'NO attach o soured Stananent grvutg tilt.reasons for such answers. FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT STATE OFs2�-1'L/1 1 C�/#I 1 ss COUNTY O /ri"4-.0.0_, ) I —67/114 C ff,}i'TT)-_--. BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HEREF Printed mane of applicant DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAKING THE FOREGOING QUESTIONNAIF AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THERE ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE L_ S.11:e^',_________ Signature ati-- SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this day of�fe2Ar4Z. 19 .// _ / YJc- .iitC.4— /64P _` 7 'if/L1'�14i--(2 /�� gjyTI7 Signature of OTAIIY PUBLIC / // My Commission expires on 6.-//.r /1/, "v�� V eN l8. HtI ZE t7 l 13Vir 1010 ' • • FORM120A —DLLC USEONLY— S'I ATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF I IQUOR I I(ENSES AND(ON PROI II' I FT 1645 WEST JEFFERSON SUITE 227 PHOENIX AZ 85007 ",AT 17 4 32 FI4 '82 602/255-5141 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER, PARTNER STOCKHOLDER (10% OR MORE), AND MANAGER ALSO EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN "APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT /r, �1 1 Name. (> Date of birth f/� ay Last / First Middle Month� year 2. Business Name -Q,J sJ{"- Place of birth. //� IAz it appears in Section 3 of Form 1201 City / S)4te - C � n �i 1 . ,.. .a) .� Isaac 3 Business address (Do not use //P O Box num r) ! ity CpLnty Zip Code , 4 Drivers license No , (O(O lJ Height �/'` Weight. /.✓>e Eye color.) Hair color State (l// 5 Name of spouse Last Date of both �z+jJ'`5O First Middle Maiden 6 Of what state are you a bona fide resident C G, II Arizona date of residency , i y73 7 Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed or Business (Give Street Address,City,State,and Zip Code) A DATES Present Position or business engaged lrw / in J' n B DATES //.T ,-i�ie�-'.FM- e...�+.J V/7 RO Position held or business engaged in ��/!73 re � �LL,� �5/.,/7D�A�\ }� �Q-et%�a-C/G - immediately preceding above(Al /0Y / -,Y.Cttim.a)TXe�ir ) o! DATES ((s AQ,ny Position held or business engaged to /7 7//9'1 73 �( 4, A, >je.-4"1" immediately preceding above(B) � 62 \Attach additional sheet if essery / I , 8. Indicate where you have resided for the last five years• FROM TO RESIDENCE Month Year Month Year Street /� City State Zip Code L'.Lr kL /944 £. a cbx,.a o�n' Attach additional sheet if necessary 9 How many hours per day will you personally spend managingag the business related hereto '— C,/ 10 Give Telephone Numbers for 1,p? jiO isin eaC—T`‘�T Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detained cited arrested indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and Irquor violations li; 1 1 p974 EYES ONO 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been fined imprisoned had sentence suspended or placed on probation for violation of any law or ordinance' OYES QW- 13 Have you ever had a business professional or liquor license rejected,denied revoked suspended,or finest in this or any other state ❑YES (al�C 14 Have you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license rejected or denied OYES CJNC 15 Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a judgment against you in any civil action the subject of which involved fraud or �� misrepresentation of a liquor related matter OYES 0411 10 II any answer to Questions 9(tumuli 15 is 'YES' attach,r signed state . pvmq complete details 17 Ate you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations EKES ON 18 Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales(Privilege)Tax Account and your city permit fees(if applicable)current arES ON 19 Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of my proposal change of business name prior to making any such changes r—PSIS ON 20 Do you agree to post the permit or license if issuerl in t cunspicious place ou flit.prtanca>s and within view of the rpmeral public prES ON 21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine and beer supplies only from licensed Arizona wholesalers O41S ON 22 Do you agree to keep all records invoices,and other documents relating to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a period of two years and to have them easily accessible for examination fiehrES ON ASS 23 Do you consent for the duration of the permit or license,it issued to the entrance inspection and search by any law enforcement official without a warrant or other process of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of �,/ the State Liquor Laws Regulations,and Board Directives OYES ON 24 Do you consent to an investigation of your background including all records of every kind•ind description including police records and to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and any other individual or agency disclosing(to releasing said udutnratiun to the I)teiai orient of Liquor I icenses and Control ES ON 25 If any answer to Questions 17 through 24 is 'NO attach i signed stalenient giving IN.Martins lur such answers. FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT STATE OF.,"(zy (J_ �� 1 ss COUNTY �OF h,.e{rXpi ) "/ I /yl/1,�110 y �O u/S L .��/C,�E J.'/7'//Q N BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HEREB // Printed 5aine of applicant DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAKING THE FOREGOING QUESTIONNAIF AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREI ARE TRUE,CORRECT AND COMPLETE Q2.7, Signature // SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this /& day of 71/(1/e.,0( 19 O i re N L awre 3//ng�Sryn of O 111HV PUBLIC My Commission expires on t '7 181 zE • • I \ ^ r FOAM 120A —D.L L C USE ONLY- STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF I IQUOR I I(EASES AND(ON I ROI 1645 WEST JEFFERSON SUITE 227 ] 4 'p)j 1 A PHOENIX A7 85007 l�1.tR I( 3 I(7'82 6021255.5141 -�, QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER PARTNER STOCKHOLDER (10% OR MORE), AND MANAGER ALSO, EACH PERSON COMPI ETING THIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD,WHICH MAY BE. ellgi OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AI,ENCY READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT. 14 1 ` a /1 Name 7/ /C/(( A.//MA-, ( /' 'i/A' 1 /C, i7. /� Date of birth '',..,/ •r/ 30 Last First Middle Month day year 2 Business Name - e ?// / C ( •C Place of birth.,i<`✓.C-%e./rN/ (As it appears in Section 3 of Form 120) City State 3 Business address / • ( C Is-- //, / /A-//C ,y>11 C (Do not use P O Box number) City County Zip Code 4 Drivers license No C/f C// f i T Height_ , Weight. Eye color ,'/(1` Hair color "Cu.''` a State 5 Name of spouse /'444"' , !` ' r /////, /! ' Date of birth � / a, .2/ First Middl Last Malden 6 Of what state are you a bona fide resident. // 4, /l, 't /i If Arizona,date of residency �/(/C ',, ///1 7 Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed �7 or Business (Give Street Address City State and Zip Coda) // A DATES, A L C 1-1) ( e c• l.' h/JSC z:.-/A-'L- Present Position or business engaged w i5 (.,(/e rr/C L'y~/C' / rf /(!/k r g? U '�6� in ,,c- CC.. ,.t i� B DATES /''.17.,,' //t c /„)e c w /V////�Nc 772,9eC. Position held or business engaged in / '7`, /// /�C 1\ /7�.//C //C" C 1 �L5;�,1 0 immediately preceding above IA) /h r( , ,f( /7 C DATES Position held or business engaged in immediately preceding above IB) Attach additional sheet if necessary B. Indicate where you have resided for the last five years FROM TO RESIDENCE Month Year Month Year Street City State Zip Code Fa /5L f'E`,iA-r /7/ / a. //`' /,:,t..t.,f/.: 71-/'//— /-7/ SS,>o-, Attach additional sheet if necessary / 9 How many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto / //'"•"`" 10 Give Telephone Numbers for r I . ( r Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detained cited arrested indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor violations OYES ZNC 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bad been lined imprisoned hall sentence suspended or placed on probation for violation of any law or ordinance DYES r4Nr 13 Have you ever had a business professional Or liquor license rep sled denied revoked suspended,or lined in this or my other state DYES �,((VC N 14 Have you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license refecied or denied OYES C 15 Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a judgment against you in any civil action, the subject of which involved fraud or misrepresentation of a liquor related matter DYES /6NC /1 OIN 16 If any answer to Questions 9 through 15 is 'YES attach sgpun(satemmnt giving complete details 17 Are you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations XIYES ON 18 Do you agree to keep your Action.State Sales(Pi ivileoe)T•ix ACCurint tin weir city permit lees lif applicable)current YIYES ON 19 Do you agree to notify the Uepar 011e111 of Liquor of my pioposed chint of business mine prim to snaking any such changes YES ON 20 Do you agree to post the permit or license it issued e1 r consPiciuus pl.icc 0111111,premises and within view of the general politic ,YES ON 21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine-intl hee,supplies only from licensed Arizona wholesalers IYES ON 22 Do you agree to keep all records invoices and other documents relating to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a period of two years and to have them easily accessible for examination RIVES ON 23 Do you consent for the duration of the permit or license if issued so the entrance inspection and search by any law enforcement official without a warrant or other process of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of the State Liquor Laws Regulations and Board Directives YES ❑f, 24 Do you consent to an investigation of your background including all records of every kind mil description including police records and to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and any other individual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control t J YES ON 25. If any answer to Questions 17 through 24 is 'NO attach a signed statement giving the reasons for such answers FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT STATE OF yF[r7L.+n'7LO 1 ...((( 1 ss COUNTY OF NJ.}Js7E l !ram ,C*2�// / I !l/c-' "J ?/ /\c BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HER El Printed name of applicant DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PFNALTY OF PERJURY THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAKING THE FOREGOING QUESTIONNAIF AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THERE ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE 4121ez-e7 ? Signature ` SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this /6.11 day of7. ot� 1961; 'ol,/9P Signature of NOTARY UBLIC My Commission expires on ZE 17 LI ear4 tt�3e uo ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF JI MOTION BY: S SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH I OUNCILMAN HUDSON ✓ . VICE MAYOR HILL I 1 UNANI��O S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED i ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE TO THE PIZZA HOUSE, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL, FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO , 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE TO THE PIZZA HOUSE, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR DISAPPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL. FOR DENIAL All W. Allik rPQ pCHE✓, tiO U , Z � 'its �� 4PIZONP COiti o 04ache cOunctian March 18, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: : JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: t- JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM APRIL 6, 1982 PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING APRIL 20, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 136 Rezoning Case No. PZ-2-82 Rezoning Request: GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone Applicant: Bill Beaulieu Power of Attorney: N/A Date of Application : January 20, 1982 Date of Advertisement: February 21, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: March 9, 1982 Area: 5 acres, including easements Application Requirements : Number of Property Owners : 5 Number of Exempt Properties• 0 Number of Affected Owners : 5 Number of Signatures: 5 or 100% Signatures by Affected Area: 100% Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) : The DCC has no objection to this rezoning. The applicant has dedicated fifty feet of road from centerline for public right-of- /� way purposes on the south of the property. Approver for Agenda _/"' ._..,_,� v e+ Item # - r4Slic Hcaring L!. Oi-4 [1t]clrlPcS 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(6Q )982-8002 New dustnen THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM March 18, 1982 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: At the regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of March 9, 1982, the following motion was passed by a 7-0 vote: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-2-82, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 136, application of William Beaulieu for his property described as the South 2 of the Southwest 4 of the Southeast * of the Southeast a of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. The reasons for that recommendation are that the area surrounding the subject property is largely commercial and it would be the highest and best use of the land and the subject property is located on an arterial . " Recommended Motion- (See attached memorandum. ) JWG:rin Amik RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 136 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-2-82 , APPLICATION OF WILLIAM BEAULIEU ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 136 , AN OROTNANCF OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCTI OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) Agri. c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) AIN APPLICATION FOR Aft OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES �,c FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Cash Receipt No.7( Z meant/6?iDate r7/f cl Case Number P2--2-4 TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as fellows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed) Parcel 1 From GR To CB-2 Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) The South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter (SSW-SEkSE'y), Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian. The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance fran nearest mapped street) 5 acres including easements located at the Northewat corner of Plaza Drive and Superstition Blvd. with 660 feet on Superstition Blve. and 330 feet on Plaza 'Drive. (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under ,/moN present zoning districting? It is presently zoned General Rural and is adjacent to high density zoning. 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer. An additional seven (7) feet was given for road right-of-way on Superstition Blvd 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the connunity or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain Yes This parcel is situated at one of the major intersections on Superstition Blvd. and is an ideal location for small businesses 4 Other reasons for the subject request Page 1 of 2 pages Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures The property is currently vacant and the proposed use of this parcel would be for commercial buildings for small shops employing a western theme Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit salve in erson to Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note The land owner(s) must sign belay or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) William A Beaulieu 306 E. Frontier Rd 982-0312 (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name of applicant/ or representative) (Address) �j (/Phone) 1 !- (/, i� /l /�c�G: !: /' LL 3( z' I f�(/i 7('/ / (1 /i/�/t r"fiF" i�[ /iCr. A/ Name & Address of person to whom petition & notices should be mailed) �S >1 / - 12-14-81 (Signature of applicant - (Date) -`Note Plans are required when application is filed for following. Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c. DO NOT FILL OUT F011OWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks. Page 2 of 2 pages /'1 ORDINANCE NO. 136 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as the South 3 of the Southwest 4 of the Southeast ; of the Southeast 4 of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classi- fication from GR General Rural Zone to CB-2 General Business Zone SECTION II REPEALING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 eiN or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. City Attorney lok b. PZ-2-82 (BEAULIEU) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 136 REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR (GENERAL RURAL) TO CB-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) GR GR GR 1 I I I I W. GREASEWOOD STD GR A ca TH w Q/ //// ' U a SUBJECT GR - SITE/ z c � 594' W. SUPERSTITION BLVD. GR CB-2 ,— TH GR SCALE n� I 1 IV 0 300 600 FEET ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES elk ITEM II MEETING OF MOTION BY: 101(\ SECONDED BY: S6-411-th YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ... CQ� MAYOR CLARKE COUNNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN DAM IANO V ,VICE MAYOR HILL I COUNCILMAN EIDSON I UNANI" US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ( 0 ) co- ITEM II MEETING OF I ' , / ' MOTION BY: �" ' 1 SECONDED BY: ())/1)/1 YES NO ABSTAINED MAY1 ' itk 111101111111 Cfl1NCILMAN DPMIANO COANCILfli LSMIT EMI COUNCLIMAN . I ON _COUNCILMAN 11 ► 1111/11111111 VICE MAYOR HILL MIN UNANI" US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 4 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 136, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) 3;,( ' CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 136 FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 136, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS ADOPTED AND APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : A . "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE . " B . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS , IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE. IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK, ) FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO. 4 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO , 136, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 136 FOR THE SECOND READING . S 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 136, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-2-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED . FOR DENIAL PQACHE✓ .► 3 G20 '��P/ZONP cOity o c pac/ e unction DATE : April 12 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO : The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council THRU: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works REGARDING: U. S . Highway 60 - Speed Limit Adjustments The response attached has been received from the Arizona Department of Transportation regarding the City ' s request to lower the speed limit on U. S Highway 60 . The State has requested a response from the City so that further action may be taken. This issue was previously discussed at a council workshop and no objection was expressed. However, a more formal reaction from the Director of Public Safety and the City Engineer is requested now that the States report and re- commendation has been received. RWB/cc Approver for Dale/ Item # First Ri ",nq �'� d .i....� Second R<ading . P;Rie Heerko ✓Uld Busing �._ New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 HE 7'4 `CIO7 9 ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION d .kve. 4 � HIGHWAYS DIVISION . ,st District 7 BRUCE BABBITT Highway 60— P 0 Box 2717, Globe, Arizona 85501 Governor April 7 , 1982 WILLIAM A ORDWAY THOMAS R LAMMERS Director Assistant Director and State Engineer Richard Broman City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Mr. Broman, At the request of the Mayor and Council of Apache Junction our Traffic Operations office has re-evaluated traffic controls on U. S. 60 through the City. Attached is a copy of their report and recom- mendations for your review. Sincerely, • -LAC: c- ii�` �C!/<�. • ('�iGlr -- ennet . Hamblin District Traffic Supervisor KPH-do rpeeI;:, 4 ♦ +4,.i r HIGHWAYS • AERONAUTICS • MOTOR VEHICLE • PUBLIC TRANSIT • ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 411111.. AM. . ZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA .ON OFFICE MEMO HIGHWAYS DIVISION March 23, 1982 TO: H.M. OSMUS District 7 Engineer #7-5-2 ATTN: KENNETH P. HAMBLIN ,.� District Traffic Supervisor FROM: DAVID R. OLIVAREZ Traffic Engineer Traffic Operations Services BY: JAMES F. SHEA Assistant Traffic Engineer Operations Studies Branch RE: Speed Study on US 60 in Apache Junction MP 194.01 to MP 198.50 At the request of Carlie Bowmer, Assistant State Eng- ineer - Traffic, a speed study has been conducted on US 60 through the City of Apache Junction. The purpose of this study is to review the speeds through the developed areas to determine if the speed limits are reasonable and prudent for the prevail- ing conditions. Increased development and growth in the Apache Junction area along US 60 has occurred primarily from the west city limits at Meridian Road to Idaho Road, a two-mile section. Signaliza- tion is planned at the intersection with Idaho Road, while a signal study is underway at Meridian Road. A shopping mall is currently underway near the west city limits which can be expected to result in further increases in traffic volumes. Consequently, while the majority of the free-flow 85th percentile speeds (see Appendix 1) range in the 45 to 50 mph range, several locations through the developed areas have lower speeds in the 40 to 45 mph range. This indicates a speed ad- justment may be in order to reflect the changing conditions through the area. Therefore, based on the traffic volumes, side friction, potential signalization at Idaho Road, it is recommended that a 40 mph speed zone be established from MP 194.00 to MP 196.45 t•8-9590 2/75 irowutwty 8-954) -2- March 23, 1g82 lb7-5-2 Results of this study are being forwarded for your consideration and any necessary coordination with local offi- cials. Once it has been determined what action is to be taken, please advise us so that we may process any required speed resolution. Aar (c)fne,no..0 DRO:J FS :ks Att. cc: Carlie Bowmer APPENDIX I A speed study (TOS #7-31-0) was conducted in April, 1981 through the Apache Junction area. This study recommended retention of the exist- ing 45 and 55 mph speed limits. Speed samples were collected at 14 locations (7 per direction) through the Apache Junction area. The results of these samples are as follows : 85TH PERCENTILE SPEEDS MILEPOST POSTED SPEED April March 1981 1982 Free* Free* All ** Flow Flow Vehicles 194.00 EB Meridian Rd. 55 51.5 50.6 49.8 194.00 WB 55 50.5 50.3 51.9 194.01 Apache Junction West City Limits 194.29 EB 55/45 Speed Break 194.39 WB 45/55 Speed Break 194.36 Dog Track Entrance (Traffic Signal) 194.37 55/45 Speed Break (By Resolution) 194.50 EB East of 45 44. 3 50.4 49.Q 194.50 WB Delaware Drive 45 46.0 47.6 45.8 195.01. Ironwood Drive (Traffic Signal) 195.10 EB Near Golden 45 39.8 42.9 38.6 195.10 WB West Restaurant 45 42.9 47.4 43.8 195.50 EB East of 45 42.8 43.7 40.7 195.50 WB Rennick Drive 45 43.3 44.9 44.2 195.82+ Junction area with SR 88 196.04 EB Near Idaho Road 45 49.3 50.0 49.1 196.04 WB 45 48.9 46.6 43.5 196.06 45/55 Speed Break (By Resolution) 196.09 EB 45/55 Speed Break 196.10 WB 55/45 Speed Break APPENDIX I (Con' t) MILEPOST POSTED SPEED 85TH PERCENTILE SPEEDS April March 1981 1982 Free* Free* All Flow Flow Vehicles** 196.60 EB Near Royal 55 55.0 ---- 53.1 196.60 WB Palm Road 55 56.5 ---- 56.6 197.28 ES Near Tomahawk 55 58.5 56.3 ---- 197.28 WB Road 55 59 .3 59.1 ---- 198.50 Apache Junction East City Limits * "Free Flow" indicates that only the speeds of free-flowing vehicles were recorded. If the traffic is platooning, the operator would normally record the first vehicle's speed and any others which don't appear to be influenced by the lead vehicle. ** "All Vehicles" indicates that the speeds of all vehicles were recorded, whether platooning is occurring or not. An 85th percentile speed sample of "all vehicles" could normally be expected to be lower than a "free flow" depending on the volume of traffic and the degree of platooning. A comparison of free flow samples between the April, 1981 study and the 'larch, 1982 study was made. Speeds near the east and west city limits showed a decrease of 0 to 2 mph over the April, 1981 values. However, speeds in the section from Delaware Drive to Idaho Road showed increases ranging from 1 to 6 mph. As expected, the majority of the 85th percentile speeds of the all vehicle samples were less than the free flow samples. MARICOPA COUNTY m m a m I Qu 1 , ---g ^ �.�cT;\♦a\�:f akC`N Co.. 1,:to\\� 1�CC:�\\\�S.\-, : .._A SCo.nry Ln•tJ .�:.�.��,:^:�::......�.,.. 5-f..r-- 1 r !I� -- ) 1pg� �• iF`i..�..fa Y«.5.. .. -:--II»r�n�()r� 1111 J•1 I �3 ��J!!// �N,((�`\ -,�-Mr«- ` 1 OIL_ AN.SI Ip� - 4 • �:L'kti:. .,5,.::"`."S^•,l°w ..1 !wI _ E �` 11 J 11103 a F. j7— RC. 1 it--or[ NI t,- .....,D,•-e.r V.ew In C✓wul f 4 fi+ u 1Y' ' \ W S Dryw a S14• Y _— •�. S D•ywn,• !r.Ii.,.JIIL l•1. �_ N C•` ,• 1 • ISG�dLt't.{--1 s0.und A.. d 1 P' i m.o. st • N OcohIN St t• i S Po,*V«-^r M«n SI 4_ 's.'i ` JJh\` A ` Inw sr NS�7 Polo 4 4 v✓fi...$1 I` 1 S 5,....,•e Sr.. _ _S_f•A.•.•sI Ni�S.A.er•S�- 1I 12 i .1 +•M•ACIII JUNCIIUN , A 1 Al.0 l ill Al sown 1 s- • \ f f l.°nwood St �i- . N Am`woe�d`t• I 1 'IS -- .e 1` — 1 : •&I. In E ,E ` IIp�I \ s '(��\ ♦ _ ».cun Ceoo« .�:Gd�ln ..��°nId SI—= . pIu'�F -*In• __; as r`=-i'I 2\ • -Iis . =VtIler Id • (r -. S -.i N`.-n1 I=• A S,l„1_-•. I W l I — __. _ Sie•M«ew tJ Du Awa > -- N s;c • •I. y 8, swn�•rf� 3 O L., \ I: 1 X�a $ Y i. Del toll2• ate- f D.I Nay h. _ - - u:i- _. .� ' ! V S M wbi� tt Itd 7 tf T r 1 'If ✓`�S Aeub td�r _ a_ S No.N=d .-_. .�__ i. 8 i p• , a i a f NO )' \ S WnnA.,M tJ II- _-_ -.. f _ N W`.•`•n•.•,R,1.a ♦1 i , TO n1 Q••.•r✓tdn; i 1 I PI \ \♦ / 5 1Vd.✓ for,Id N Wd. m• /y IAW I tare-/ht= ^ � •1,IoaA y. Cea..IN -- taa► -A1 1♦ I i set V;.. La ` w 1 ♦ 9 S imoAewl d ...("�_."� yenoFew G Q gN jT 1 1 \ swnl,w O.RQ:_ _ • IQ N WkL _wD.. Wrrk1. I ` . , W� S D I •••1. td 1 •\• r • S SI•n Id •• • • 1• ` •}l N Stun IJ .• I_ ♦\ 1 L , i ` : • .-. •N } f1 ..1i ._$ -'- : • $la?JL.IJ.J ,� yjt.•''j,;;;. :..NK4��\\\'\�:�\\\\\\\\\`_gin^ tC v , -� sNn NwimS I OISSIWSN.aI a IMOd All ill • 1 I. �� —_. I 1 ,- I - • I i — MATCH IMF• .1 IS ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: Sow YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMM DAMIANO COUNC I LMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNAN S IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IT BE RECOMMENDED TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT A 40 MPH SPEED ZONE BE ESTABLISHED FROM MILEPOST 194 , 00 (MERIDIAN DRIVE) TO 196. 45 ( IDAHO ROAD) . PQACHE✓, 6.My O t 'K { +IW (Z U dk l'} . r `, q,pIZCNP ity ot c liache cOunction Approver for Agenda .__..... DATE : April 12 , 1982 rate ; Item # First Reading �f MEMORANDUM TO : The Honorable Mayor and Second ReadingMembers of the City Council .. ....�.:..� Public Hearing FROM: City Engineer Old Business New Business THRU: City Manager REGARDING: SL 8203-1 ; the APACHE VILLAS - CLEARVIEW STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (Covering in particular : Apache Villa III Lots 141-172, Apache Villa IV Lots 1-15, and Clearview Lots 1-22 . ) The residents of the above described subdivisions have requested by petition that a street light improvement district be formed. This office has coordinated with the residents ' represent- atives , the utilities, and governmental agencies toward the establishment of the district . An outline of the steps in the procedure is listed below. The first three steps have been accomplished and your Resolution of Intention (attached) is step "D" of the process : A. Prepare district limits (attached) . B. Locate where lights will be installed (attached) . C. Prepare cost estimates (attached) . D. Council approves Resolution of Intention . E. Action is advertised. F. Protest period is provided (30 days) . G. Protest hearing and ruling by Council (if applicable) . H. Council orders work. I. Utility schedules work. J. Utility installs improvements. K. City accepts improvements. The attached Salt River Project estimate results in an esti- mated annual cost of $28. 60 per lot , with the first three-year annual cost at $38. 03 per lot for 69 lots . AMA/sh Attachments 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 L___l.._..1 L_I._!_1_1 I-__1._I _ l__-I__ 1__1�) L.:. I . i _I -_ 1 _1_1_1 I._1__l_1_1_1 I ,J (��f. r .,> ;. - Y a f" , � r. /-.•. i n' w f7—.fn' yqp+`in__..:--n "-.-� ' t' i ,®1O ® ®fl: ® ® (00r(,) O ,On11)I ^� :Oir.) 0e O; O' ��,')[;(.90L6) 0(z� G ;0 ` ` ' --'-)--"- 3- _at)��.y/ (n� (—) ( ( ) (2) c G2 .("o)/ \ -U I])1('d_) (�/ I(.. / (w) L , • . is OIII lU.» z LINO Y Y' — -- _!>-l J .. C J .. . iS .Ill l'.l (J <�..,4M,r n p �l U" v bu ;, .,, ' o 't __.r a a: P �.; i �c • `(_ , . lw/ O :® �/ ® l>r� �i)y® (ll � ) "( (� _ (� r n\,�) (�) (�) () {`� l� l�/ ( )M� 1 �� t..l 1 ) l�/ (Ql E., H rr T•'6Ra i3R'� o.�umii �orb r -r o r a �M i,r .....r�...w:.r .o....''r "" """'"".r.. —.r.".....- -,- , — 8. . �Lr UL) (� ® "". (.�) 1( ( Eri, . ,0 _ .i ,.,-,D ( ( ( ) ( )II (w) . {{II(� �_ n`�'" ()10 _ tr)ri ) Ie ,(f ) .(;' n) (") °' [�>:1 —.,t. , . I �y— � .�. , / _1 �'�_ L_� ��i. Y _a . . _. l :1 J .Y� -- n rd i' LS lVyyvlvHJ f 11Nf1 n 1S 1,1dvJVHJ I 1.N11 r (=' H CI (n cioa ti s a m � le 0[4 Mr.Cd(Dt(d©Le a), a), (_1').: r(i',..) 110 G3) a) e e ro ® a) n z H ��s s,�,P�,1,'�, ,%f��r i4+/ �Y 4' �/��/ `- ��° ►�/ / /1 I c7 , �� '` (J CD • ro N r__ .., ,/��. .#..r/////////_ .„J_//.r%/ -.7,- ^_ _._,4r//_ „ A'i' -.- ", "////%J/////////i`% �� ''t �� I- 0 / d ��f - /V11,0,0e_Orft_ e4tri.P0,9:ide, i%��%�r %�ii► I%Iiw f /`: ' /.ii % Sri . /pi Of AO if7, rd/ Agf-Afrof 4 __/ s F,, H " ;yf ,� f 54GULR0 CRI'JE Y .?!: y I� �� M i l J r, '. ,,` - •=fir 0; `�- ,� Qm '/,��//�/�1��/,�1'��il� i. : '4---- ..('•••i.';'';, ..,j ,. r I r C) !i u'.11:':".2e.I ; . . • 0 0 ' ® 1/ 0 ....q .0 ri-1.)© �,_. _ _ :•ti . O • O _ ,.a i.1-1, .., . 12 r-si • Y ( > (*) O /' \ I,•) 1 ��- •tY ' �.<.. ,,. ' if a 5 1^_ ,• O yi, i •. (t')\ •($I I >^ ; / •A ,,1y•• \... ... t 'I a‘....., '' �> !_ll ,,.jk. t ,_.�.. 1�.s i , 1 1. 1.y l `.r rk • t. n .r V ')4 ',1 lJ -'1 ^�LLC—(.13) ; U ,fin, ( 0 ' AM! JEW Salt River Project WATER 4V,POWER BOX 1980 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85001 March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE 273.5900 City of Apache Junction Public Works Department 1001 N. Idaho Apache Junction, Arizona 85233 ATTN: Richard W. Broman, Director r Dear Mr. Broman: APACHE VILLA III , APACHE VILLA IV & CLEARVIEW STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Following are estimated costs for street lighting for the subject subdivisions in accordance with the proposed layout and as calculated per E-50 Rate Schedule, effective April 1 , 1981 : ( 2) 30,000 lumen sodium vapor lamps , streamlined style @ $9.90 ea./mo. $19.80 (12) 9,500 lumen sodium vapor lamps , streamlined style @ $6.65 ea./mo. $79.80 (12) 26'6" steel poles and ( 2) 31 ' steel poles @ $4.63 ea./mo. $64.82 Total Monthly Cost* 164.42 Total Cost Per Year* 1973.04 Estimated Annual Cost Per Lot** (TBD) Cost during first three years @ 1 .33 x Annual Cost** (TBD) *Costs do not include fuel escalation, taxes, or interest. **Estimates based upon assumption that lots have equal assessed valuation and are (TBD) to be determined by city when number of lots and parcels within the district are known. Sincerely, Tom M. Allison Sr. Power Consultant Customer Power Use Service bj xc: Ltg. Div. (2) C.E.S. - B. Phelps RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO 82-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PURCHASE ELECTRICTY, WHICH INCLUDES A CHARGE FOR THE USE OF LIGHTING FACILITIES, FOR LIGHTING PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN AN AREA Described as Apache Villa III Lots 141-172, Apache Villa IV �� Lots 1-15, and Clearview Lots 1-22, P C R , Pinal County, Arizona. ALL WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO A R S 9-7313 and 9-714 DECLARING THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRICITY TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY PUBLIC BENEFIT, AND THAT THE COST OF SAID ELECTRICITY SHALL BE ASSESSED ON A CERTAIN DISTRICT• AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the type of lighting facilities to be installed and has considered the rate to be paid for purchasing the electricity for the proposed district, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, as follows SECTION 1 That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of the governing body of the City of Apache Junction to order the purchase of the electricity which includes a charge for the use of lighting facilities within an area bounded by, Described as (as were listed above) IL SECTION 2 The cost of the electricity shall be the established rate of the Salt River Project for street lighting service. SECTION 3 That the lighting of the streets in the area described in Section 1 of this Resolution shall be in accordance with the plan hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Apache JunctioreN Arizona, and on file in the office of the City Engineer, known as the Apache Junction Improvement District SL No 8203-1. SECTION 4 In no event will the City of Apache Junction or any officer thereof, be liable for any portion of the cost of supplying electricity to said Improvement District, nor for any delinquency of persons or property assessed unless the assessment for district purposes against the property within such district exceeds the assessment maximum contained in A R S Sec 9-713 (D), in which event the City of Apache Junction shall be liable for the cost in excess of said statuatory maximums. SECTION 5 That said purchase of electricity in the opinion of the Council of the City of Apache Junction is of more than local or ordinary bene- fit, and the cost is hereby made chargeable upon the District, and the District benefitted by said street lights is legally described in Section 1 Any portion of any public street, avenue, alley or right-of-way that may be included in the above described district is excepted from any such assessment Resolution of intention Pg 2 SECTION 6 The City Council shall make an annual statement and estimate of the expenses of the District which shall be provided for by the levy and collection of the ad valorem taxes of the assessed value of all property, real and personal, in the District as provided in ^ A R S. Sec. 9-713 (C) and amendments thereto, which taxes shall be collected as county taxes are collected in the amount shown by the statement and estimate adopted by the City Council. SECTION 7 The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of A R S Sec 9-675, and unless protests received pursuant to A R S Sec 9-676are sufficient to bar further proceedings, the Director of Public Works shall there- after proceed with the improvement as petitioned and described above WHEREAS, the immediate operation of the provisions of this resolution is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency declared to exist, and this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its final passage and adopt- ion by the City Council of the City of Apache Junction PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Apache Junction, and APPROVED by the Mayor this day of , 1982. IL WENDELL J. CLARKE - MAYOR ^ ATTEST KATHY CONNELLY - CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM • DA D F AL DER CITY ATTORN Aft AM ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 120 YES NO ABSTAINED S ICII MANDAMIANO v / ILMAN EIDSON / 1 " ILr AN HUDSON V G CI ARKS _VIC.F MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN STFFLSMITH UNANI" US IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 6 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO . 82-16, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PURCHASE ELECTRICITY, WHICH INCLUDES A CHARGE FOR THE USE OF LIGHTING FACILITIES, FOR LIGHTING PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN AN AREA: ir- DESCRIBED AS APACHE VILLA III LOST 141-172, APACHE VILLA IV LOTS 1-15, AND CLEARVIEW LOTS 1-22, P,C . R . , PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA . ALL WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, PURSUANT TO A . R. S . 9-7313 AND 9-714 DECLARING THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRICITY TO BE OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDINARY PUBLIC BENEFIT, AND THAT THE COST OF SAID ELECTIRICTY SHALL BE ASSESSED ON A CERTAIN DISTRICT; 14l+' t AA k�' KCE 'O, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . ///057:::;)err'�4/Zo it ora C4 pac/ie C)unction DATE: April 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO : The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: The City Engineer THRU: The City Manager/Director of Public Works REGARDING: Establishment of Urban Boundaries For Federal Aid to Street Construction Attached is a copy of a map which will show establishment of the Urban Boundaries of the City of Apache Junction, running from Lost Dutchman Boulevard to Baseline Road, and from Meridian Drive to Goldfield Road . This map is to be submitted to the Maricopa Association of Governments for submittal by them to „^ the Arizona Department of Transportation . Establishment of this Urban Boundary is the first step in creating a system by which Federal Aid may be apportioned to the City of Apache Junction to help defray the costs of construction of major streets . We ask that the Mayor and the Members of the Council adopt a Resolution establishing the Urban Boundaries as shown on the attached map . Approver for Agenda.....1�'d! pate, Item AMA/s h First Reading l'K2 Second Reading Public Hcar:ng - Old Business New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 0 040 4444444404401I4444444 .144 .I444 -1444444444II4444444444444444444444 _1111- _P.'• _,M1111..... • 1••••••Si . .... / , ___,, i. 1 i 11_, I. S MI- .:; 1rb; m • • r� i 3 p . u • 11 19 • 20 1 21• r `.-.. 1 / w CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION i ' .sue - i .� _ URBAN BOUNDARY DESIGNATION ___r..S • '6 t ^ •` I t ' r r I ..tee-. .1 , . 1 •f 1 • ! 1 e I ! r rt. . CI I ' t ' i II r. '''' .gym I .»_ I / y— N. PRESENT CITY BOUNDARIES APACHE JUNCTION, N. , 32 I ARIZONA N` PROPOSED URBAN BOUNDARY*" °M- "'--' --'- `�� 14414444 '1441444411441444444d4444d4444 ill 4444444414444444444444444444 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF r MOTION BY: ,) - SECONDED BY: „WinI-LA YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON I COUNCILMIAN EIDSON VICE_MAYOR HILL ;7 COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ m,AYOR CLA.RKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ✓ UNANIn S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT URBAN BOUNDARIES BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING FEDERAL AID FOR STREETS CONSTRUCTION IN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AND THAT THESE URBAN BOUNDARIES BE DELINEATED AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP, MARKED "EXHIBIT A" . PQACHE✓ �. at; tl ti0 z AlPiZOaP its &4pache vunction April 14, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 82-14 LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL RESOLUTION NO. 82-15 INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS The City of Apache Junction currently has $500,000.00 in idle funds invested with a local banking institution. Banking institutions nation-wide can only insure each account to a maximum of $100,000.00. The Arizona State Treasurer has available a Local Government Inv st- ment Pool which was established by the Arizona Revised Statutes S 35-326 in 1980. This legislation allows local governments to invest in a 100% insured fund, provides high interest return and maximum flexibility. The attached information packet describes the investment pool in more detail . RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that the City Council approve proposed Resolution 82-14 authorizing the city's participation in the Local Government Investment Pool for those funds exceeding the $100,000 insurable amount. Staff further recommends that Council approve proposed Resolution 82-15 authorizing the City Treasurer (City Clerk) to invest funds up to the insured amount of $100,000 in accordance with the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes § 35-323. This proposed resolution must be adopted on an annual basis and is being proposed in conjunction with Resolution No 82-14 rather than waiting until the adoption of the new budget or the beginning of the new fiscal year. ..;14,t,k-eeg7 7 'J,/. James Tuvel l , Jr. �'Pity Manager Approver for Agenda Dat. , #ftam. First Reading I?i.k.T . •-- Second Reading r•----•�+ Public Hearing ... Oki Business .1�_. New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ARIZONA STATE TREASURER LOCAL GOVERNMENT POOL 35-326 A.R.S. During the 34th Legislative session of 1980, we recommended the establishment of a Local Government Investment Pool . The legislature acted upon my recom- mendation and passed A.R.S. 35-326, "Pooled Investment Fund" . The Local Government Pool (LGIP) is a vehicle which is intended to provide units of local government with an investment option not available through other avenues. Almost all governments have at certain times of the year "idle funds" or cash balances which are in "'ak excess of immediate or near term operating needs. Sound management practices call for these funds to be invested to earn interest, thereby increasing the revenues available to the governmental unit through a means other than taxation. The State of Arizona earned in excess of $45 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1980 and will earn in excess of $100 million ending June 30, 1981. Most governments recognize their obligation to maximize revenues in this manner but many are handicapped by a lack of resources and do not have balances large enough (several million dollars) in order to maximize the yield. The LGIP created by this act would for investment purposes be combined with the State 's investment pool which is in excess of $625,000, 000 . A pool of this size is capable of negotiating its investments from a position of significant strength. Since its inception, July 1, 1981, the "Pooled Fund " has earned for its participants the following effective rates: * July - August ' 81 16 .50% September ' 81 17 .54% October '81 16 .14% November '81 14 . 29% December '81 12 .74% .•. January '82 12 . 90% *Please note these are average rates and at any given time the pool has funds invested at both higher and lower rates depending on the maturity schedules in order to meet liquidity requirements. While the pool will be commingled with the State ' s investment pool, all funds invested will be accounted for separately and earnings credited to each account on a monthly basis . The cost of operating the LGIP will be determined after six months of operations . However, we feel the cost per participant will not exceed $50 annually. Participation in the LGIP will be completely voluntary on the part of local government. It may be used as a primary or secondary means of investment in conjunction with your current investment program and adjusted in its use depending upon the judgment of local officials on what is best for their needs . It will be in a highly liquid form of investments with principle being available for withdrawal on the date of maturity or for emergencies, with a twenty-four hour notice. All transactions will be conducted by wire transfer with state- ments being provided on each account on a monthly basis. Procedures for establishing and operating an account will be kept as simple as possible. It will consist of completing the attached application for an account which must be certified by the appropriate local official . Please specify those individuals who will be authorized to deposit and withdraw from the LGIP. .-. I have attached additional information about the LGIP, and the types of investments which will be made by my staff. A critical point regarding the establishment of the LGIP is the need expressed by you. We are here to assist you and help make this program as successful as possible. Hope to hear from you soon. Sincerely, Clark R. Dierks State Treasurer DT/mc ♦" or* LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP) INFORMATION PACKET FOR POOL PARTICIPANTS Office Number: Prepared by: 1-602-255-5815 Clark R. Dierks State Treasurer Dan Thurber Investment Officer The pool is a readily available investment for any amount of funds for any length of time. The only requirement is that the length of the investment in the pool should be economic ; for instance, a $5, 000 investment for 5 days at 17% yield would earn approximately $11.80 . The pool would have to expend approximately $8 . 00 to handle the transaction. Therefore, we will require a minimum of $50, 000 in deposits and multiples $10, 000 over the amount. The transfer of funds to the pool involves almost no loss of time. You simply request your respective servicing bank to wire or credit (VNB accounts only) our servicing bank account at Valley National Bank. Withdrawals can be made using the reverse of the above procedure. TRANSFERS OR WITHDRAWALS SHOULD BE MADE AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE MORNING AND MUST BE MADE NO LATER THAN 9 : 00 a.m. A mini- mum of one (1) day advance to the pool for deposits or withdrawals of $1,000 ,000 .00 or more is required. INVESTMENTS In order that a high degree of liquidity and proper diversi- fication be maintained, certain guidelines are observed. The State Treasurer' s Investment Committee will set the guide- lines for size and types of investments made by the pool . Local Governments in Arizona may invest in U.S . Government and Agencies guaranteed by the U.S. Government, and Certificate of Deposits (T.C.D. 's) collateralized in accordance with ARS 35-323 . SETTING UP AN ACCOUNT Before using the Local Government Pool, a local government must obtain the consent of the government body by resolution, ordinance or other appropriate means . A copy of the resolu- tion and a list of authorized individuals who can make transfers, withdrawals and deposits for investments must be furnished to this office. Once compliance with this requirement has been met, we shall assign the respective governmental agency a pool number for all transactions . (See Attach. 1) INVESTMENT PROCEDURE Contact the State Treasurer' s Investment Officer or a member of his staff prior to 9: 00 a.m. on the morning of the transfer to: a. Advice on how much will be transferred. b. Time period funds may be invested. The State Treasurer' s Office will return to the local government agency a daily activity report showing all ledger activity for the day. (See Attach. 2) PROPOSED PORTFOLIO RULES FOR STATE OF ARIZONA LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL I. General A. The assumed minimum portfolio size is $25,000, 000 B. Guidelines relating to size of investments and types are specified in ARS 35-326 . C. No delayed deliveries beyond normal settlement II. Maturity Distribution A. 25% of actual portfolio must mature within 30 days. B. Balance of portfolio invested evenly, but not to exceed 13 months. III. Diversification of Portfolio A. At least 25 % of actual portfolio must be in Repurchase Agreements to afford liquidity requirements . B. Balance of portfolio in TCD ' s, Governments and Agencies guaranteed by the U.S. Government. The following rules apply to the desired portfolio makeup. The Investment Officer will recommend to the Investment Committee types and amounts of investments greater than 30 days . ACCOUNT AND REPORTING FUNCTIONS The following information includes sample month-end reports sent to the Local Governmental Unit. Other Reports and information available upon request are: End of the Month Portfolio holdings End of the Month Portfolio Guidelines Notice of Local Government Investment Meeting* *LGI Meetings are combined with the State Treasurer's Monthly Investment Meeting. Please contact the Pool Staff if you would like to receive these or any other mailings. p The following described reports will be mailed to the Local Governmental Unit monthly along with a warrant for interest earned during the reporting period. FUND SUMMARY REPORT (Attach. 3 is Optional) 1. Fund Number: Specific number assigned to the Local Governmental Unit. �► 2 . Fund Name: Name Assigned by the State Treasurer 3 . Beginning Balance: Carry-forward balance from previous month. 4 . Total Debits: Represent all deposits of Principal and Interest to the respective fund. 5 . Total Credits: Represent all withdrawals of Principal and Interest payments to the respective fund. 6 . Ending Balance: Net of total debits and total credits . Normally the ending balance will represent the total principal invested. 7 . Total Debits: Represent total investments plus interest earned by the fund. 8. Total Credits: Represents total withdrawals and interest payments made to the fund. 9 . Total Ending Balance: Represent total interest and prin- cipal of all funds . Normally this balance will reflect actual monies invested to date. FUND LEDGER REPORT (Attach. 4) 1. Transaction Date 2 . Type Code: TYPE DESCRIPTION 01 Deposit (Increase Investment Outstanding Amount) 02 Interest 03 Adjustment Correction 21 Withdrawal (Decrease Investment Outstanding Amoi'nt) 23 Adjustment Correction 3 . Source: Indicates a beginning balance or State of Arizona Source document number. 4 . Additions : To the Pool by transaction date. 5. Deductions: From the Pool by transaction date. 6 . Balance: Daily ending balance. 7 . Recap by Type Code: Recap of items 1 through 6 above. DAILY ACTIVITY REPORT (See Attach. 2) Item Description 1 Specific Fund Number Assigned. 2 Beginning Balance Prior to Day' s activity. 3 Internal Processing Code to update computer file. 1 - Deposit (Reinvestment) 2 - Interest 3 - ADJ. (Correction) 4 - Wire-in of Principal 21 - Maturity 22 - Interest Withdrawal 23 - Correction (ADJ. ) 24 - Wire back of Principal 4 Increase in Fund. 5 Decrease in Fund. 6 Description of Activity. 7 Ending Balance After Daily Activity. APPORTIONED INTEREST REPORT (See Attach. 5) Item Description 1 Unique Fund Number Assigned. 2 Fund Name 3 Total Average Balance For a one month period. 4 Amount of Interest Due Respective Funds . 5 Total Average Balance All Funds with Yield for month. Ask RESOLUTION NO 82-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MONIES IN A LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL. Amok WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statutes 835-326 was enacted to create a Local Government Investment Pool in the State Treasury for the deposit of monies from local agencies for the purpose of investment by the State Treasurer, and WHEREAS, the Apache Junction City Council does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Government Investment Pool , in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes §35-326, is in the best interest of the City of Apache Junction; and WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction has invested idle funds with local financial institutions in amounts exceeding the $100,000 00 maximum deposit insured by federal agencies, NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the deposit and withdrawal of City monies in the Local Government Investment Pool in the State Treasury, in accordance with the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes S35-326, be and hereby is authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following three officers, or their successors in office, shall be authorized to order the deposit and withdrawal of monies in the Local Government Investment Pool. IL Jesse James Tuvell, Jr , City Manager Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Rosemary Montgomery, Finance Officer PASSED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA /111N, WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY ( City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEET I NG OF MOT ON BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL COUNC I LMAN, STEELSM I TH COUNC I LMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON !.rOUNCILMAN YOR CLARKE DAMIANO _ Ol NCI LMAN SHANKS UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-14, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MONIES IN A LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . RESOLUTION NO. 82-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS OF $100,000 00 OR LESS; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO INVEST CITY FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction is required by Title 35, Chapter 2, Article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, to adopt procedures for the deposit of City funds of $100,000.00 or less; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt annually a Resolution of continuing effect authorizing the Treasurer to invest funds collected for the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 35-327 (G), the Treasurer of the City of Apache Junction is authorized to invest funds of $100,000 00 or less, collected for the City, as provided in the procedures of Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 35, Chapter 2, Article 2, as follows: 1 The City Treasurer shall award deposits to one or more financial institutions either within or without the corporate limits which offer the highest rate of interest commensurate with the safety of such deposit; IL 2. The City Treasurer shall give notice to each public de- pository within the corporate limits and, in his discretion, to any other public depository in the State of the amount of City funds available for deposit, the period of time such funds will be deposited and the time bids will be opened, such notice shall be in writing unless the Treasurer determines that the amount of time necessary to prepare and transmit such notice in writing may result in a loss of interest earnings in which case notice shall be by telephone or other appropriate means, 3. At the time specified in the notice the Treasurer or his authorized representative shall open the written bids and announce the bids, 4. The City Treasurer shall award the bid to the public de- pository offering the highest rates of interest provided such interest rate is not less than One Hundred and Three Percent (103%) of the equivalent bond yield of the United States Treasury Bills of like terms; 5 If the depository offering the highest rate of interest has bid or is eligible for only a portion of the funds, the Treasurer shall award that portion to such depository and the remaining portion shall be awarded to the depository bidding the next highest rate of interest; 6 In the case of tie bids, the Treasurer shall award the enacted deposit to the financial institution with the lowest ratio of public deposits in relation to its capital structure, the public depository shall be responsible for submitting documentation of such ratio and the Treasurer shall have the right to rely on the accuracy of such documentation, 7. The Treasurer shall prepare a report of each award of enacted deposits specifying the public depositories notified, the rate of interest bid by each, and the depository or depositories to which the deposit was awarded and shall submit such report to the City Council at its next regular meeting, Resolution No 82-15 Page One of Two ^. 8 The Treasurer is authorized to invest in Treasury Bills or other United States Treasury Securities with a maturity date of twelve months or less if no bids are received at an interest rate not less than the equivalent bond yield of United States Treasury Bills of like term computed from the asking price on the business date previous to the date bids are open; 9 The Treasurer shall keep in his possession for not less thank two years all bids received, 10 The City Council reserves the right, through its Treasurer, to reject any and all bids PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1982 WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST IL KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Resolution No 82-15 Page Two of Two ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS _COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE. MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 82-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS OF $100,000, 00 OR LESS; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO INVEST CITY FUNDS, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED , RESOLUTION NO 82-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MONIES IN A LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statutes §35-326, was enacted to create a Local Government Investment Pool in the State Treasury for the deposit of monies from local agencies for the purpose of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the Apache Junction City Council does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Government Investment Pool, in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes_ §35-326, is in the best interest of the City of Apache Junction, and WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction has invested idle funds with local financial institutions in amounts exceeding the $100,000 00 maximum deposit insured by federal agencies, NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the deposit and withdrawal of City monies in the Local Government Investment Pool in the State Treasury, in accordance with the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes g35-326, be and hereby is authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following three officers, or their successors in office, shall be authorized to order the deposit and withdrawal of monies in the Local Government Investment Pool Jesse James Tuvell , Jr., City Manager Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Rosemary Montgomery, Finance Officer BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the immediate operation of this Resolution is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction and an emergency is declared to exist, and this Resolution shall be in full force and �► effect from and after its passage, adoption or approval by the City Council of Apache Junction. PASSED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST. KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk PPROVED AS TO FORM City A torney ITEM NO . 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MONIES IN A LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . 1 � RESOLUTION NO 82-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MONIES IN A LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statutes §35-326, was enacted to create a Local Government Investment Pool in the State Treasury for the deposit of monies from local agencies for the purpose of investment by the State Treasurer; and WHEREAS, the Apache Junction City Council does hereby find that the deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Government Investment Pool , in accordance with Ari7nna Revised Statutes_ §35-326, is in the best interest of the City of Apache Junction; and WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction has invested idle funds with local financial institutions in amounts exceeding the $100,000 00 maximum deposit insured by federal agencies; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the deposit and withdrawal of City monies in the Local Government Investment Pool in the State Treasury, in accordance with the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes 535-326, be and hereby is authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following three officers, or their successors in office, shall be authorized to order the deposit and withdrawal of monies in the Local Government Investment Pool Jesse James Tuvell , Jr., City Manager Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Rosemary Montgomery, Finance Officer BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the immediate operation of this Resolution is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety of the City of Apache Junction and an emergency is declared to exist, and this Resolution shall be in full force and „► effect from and after its passage, adoption or approval by the City Council of Apache Junction. PASSED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF TF1CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk PPROVED AS TO FORM City A torney ITEM NO . 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE INVESTMENT OF CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MONIES IN A LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED , of\CHF y G 0 r,n _ti � • U ,.N Z '1R,ZoNP ` its L. pache &unction April 15 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1, THROUGH: V"ll CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: PROJECT NO. DPS. 001-82 RECORDER BID On March 28 through April 2 , 1982 , a legal advertisement was placed in the Mesa Tribune requesting bids for the expansion of the Department of Public Safety Recorder Logger. In as much as no bids were received to upgrade the Dictaphone Recorder Logger from any company other than Dictaphone, I am requesting that their bid of $6 ,500. 00 be accepted. �•. Attached is a copy of the legal advertisement as well as the recommendation from the Director of Public Safety. If you should have any questions , please direct them to William McDaniel , Director of Public Safety, Kathleen Connelly Approver for Agenda t`-L-_�� City Clerk h / Item # First Reading ,. 22 lvc Second Reading -_-„ .. Public Hearing Attachments ---•- Oldd Business Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ...... ...... oNcHEJ ,,t ,, ,,,,,,,,x,,A,., 0 ..„,.,.,,,,,,,,„,„ ,, r i4 iyi'I ;; . O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY "9P/ZONP (Oily o &4pucf2e 09unctian W E McDANIEL April 13, 1982 Memorandum To: City Clerk From: Director of Public Safety , Thru: City Manager IIISubje Bid Call for Expansion of Recorder Logger. Inasmuch as no Bids were received for our Bid Call to up-grade our Dictaphone Recorder Logger from any company other than Dictaphone, I am requesting that their Bid of $6,500.00 be accepted. Following your concurrence, and that of the Council, we will proceed with a Purchase Order. Approver for Agenda �� at• Item # rust Reading f / - y M 1econd Reading ,,..•..r..nms Public Hearing tId Business 114-. ip..5ww+tses 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD.•POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 ,,, i .:lik-r Z AlR,Zoto' c0it y 4 C479ucAe e9unction NOTICE INVITING BID PROPOSALS Notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be accepted by the City Clerk , City of Apache Junction, Arizona, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, 85220, until 10:00 a.m. , on April 6, 1982, for the following equipment for the Department of Public Safety: 1. 20 CHANNEL RECORDING HEADS, SELECTOR BUTTONS AND OTHER RELATED EQUIPMENT TO UPGRADE A DICTAPHONE SERIES 4000 RECORDER LOGGER FROM 10 TO 20 CHANNELS. 2. ALL INSTALLATION INCLUDED 3. FULL YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL NEW PARTS/EQUIPMENT Specifications are on file at the Department of Public Safety and are available upon request. ' Equipment items are conceptual in nature and related to interfacing with existing equipment. Any mention to a particular vendor is to identify the conceptual nature of existing equipment only. All vendors with qualified equipment will be considered bidders. Delivery and installation shall be within 60 days following award of bid. The City of Apache Junction reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to accept the bid determined to be in the best interest of the City of Apache Junction. All bids are to be sealed and marked: Recorder Bid-DPS. 001-82 on the outside of the envelope and sent to the City Clerk, City of Apache Junction, 1001 North Idaho Road. , Apache Junction, Arizona 85220. All bidders will be notified by mail of the results of the bidding. Bids will be opened at 10:00 a.m. on April 6, 1982, at Apache Junction City Hall , 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona. Dated at Apache Junction, Arizona, this 26th day of March, 1982. Publish March 28 - April 2, 1982. ./,_/6, a„,ziL.9,, Kathleen Connelly City Clerk 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: t-fSECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN DPMIANO __CO1NcIUAN STEELSPIIT�i COUNCILMAN HUDSON .-COUNCILMAN FTDSON VICE MAYOR HILL UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONTRACT FOR RECORDER BID, NO . DPS 001-82, BE AND HEREBY IS AWARDED TO D I CTAPHONE IN THE AMOUNT OF . #1'690- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE DELIVERED AND INSTALLED WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE AWARD OF THIS BID . ?ACHE vo ••• (1 O Witt' ' `/ ache 2unction Approver for Agenda e1e; ikr i•► DATE : APRIL 13, 1982 Firs+Reeding f 15 fU Second Reading MEMORANDUM TO : THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL - Public Hearing Old Business FROM: CITY ENGINEER ..k.New Bulk rose THRU: CITY MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING: Contract for Chip Seal Construction Project 4JPW 82-2 Per the direction of the Mayor and the Members of the City Council, the Department of Public Works advertized and received bids for chip sealing of several miles of streets within the City of Apache Junction. Three contractors actually picked up bids after advertizement and phone calls . Two bids were received and were opened as per the advertize- ment at 11 : 00 A.M. , April 12, 1982 . The high bidder was Slurry Seal of Arizona, which proposed to do our chip sealing work for $1. 11 per square yard plus traffic control and striping for a total of $123 , 276 . 50. The low bid was by Benson Contracting Company, a division of Union Rock and Materials Corporation. Benson Contracting proposed to perform the chip seal operations for 52C per square yard plus traffic control and striping for a total of $59 , 558 . 00. Many telephone conversations before and subsequent to the opening of the bid have assured the City staff that Benson Contracting Company is fully cogni- zant of all the requirements for the operation and has made a responsive and responsible bid . We ask that the Mayor and City Council approve acceptance of this proposal . We further ask that the Mayor and the City Council allow and direct the Department of Public Works to explore the possibility with the contractor of chip sealing more miles of existing paved roads which are in need of surface coating. The contractor has indicated that he would extend his contract to more miles of street at a rate of 55c per square yard . The increase is due to the need to import the chip material from a greater distance . 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Page 2. Attached to this letter is a list of street sections which may be selected for chip sealing under an extension of the contract in question. If the Mayor and the Members of the Council have any priority items to be found on this list , we would welcome directions at this time. AMA!sh OPTIONAL CHIP SEAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1 . Superstition from Meridian to Goldfield . 2 . The North half of Southern from east of the High School to San Marcos. 3 . Tomahawk from Southern to the alley south of 18th Avenue and from 17th Avenue to Highway 60. 4 . Ironwood, . 4 of a mile south of Southern. ' 5 . San Marcos; Southern to 17th Avenue. 6. San Marcos from Superstition to Teepee. 7 . Delaware from Highway 60 to Superstition . 8 . Royal Palm from Navajo to Highway 60 . 9 . Plaza from Superstition to Teepee . 10 . Valley from Superstition to Teepee. AMA/sh PQACHE✓ Am..., C is -- 4PIZONP V ity oly C pache &2unction CHIP SEALING STREETS PW-82-2 '•~ APRIL 12, 1982 Those Present: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Rich Broman, Director of Public Works Joe Gero, Director of Planning Art Allen, City Engineer Doug Dobson, Operations Supervisor Lori Clark, Administrative Secretary Slurry Seal of Arizona, 642 N. 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Bentson Contracting Company, P.O. Box 8007 Phoenix, Arizona 85066 On March 28, 1982, through April 2, 1982, a public notice was published in the Mesa Tribune inviting bid proposals for the chip sealing of Apache Junction streets. The written bids were to be submitted by 11:00 a.m. , April 12, 1982, in compliance with bid specifications and the total amount of the bid. The bids, opened and read by the City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, were as follows: Bid Total Bentson Contracting Co. Surety Bond, 5% of total bid $ 59,558.00 (Global Surety and Insurance Co. ) Slurry Seal of Arizona Surety Bond, 5% of total bid $123,276.50 (Transamerica Insurance Co. of California) /7'//-1-7-.1 (,,e-1.-__- 6---/..-x_e_r% Kathleen Connelly City Clerk WITNESS: je,114, t) Joe Gero Director of Planning 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ON OIN 4- WITNESS: 1 1 tl c \:.:,, k,..LA__ _..c (0,_ C. ) ,J.Lt__.`.,),A., WI3P -..- 7')C,?..--I_L ,� Douglas Do son Lori Clark Operations Supervisor Administrative Secretary ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM ## MEETING OF MOTION BY: G.-(J '-') 5 Jec-il'-' SECONDED BY; Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH A . MAYOR CLARKE V COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO I VICE MAYOR HILL / COU"!CIL"'AN EIDSON i/ UNANI!" US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PROPOSAL BY BENTSON CONTRACTING COMPANY DATED APRIL 12, 1982, FOR CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PROJECT NO . PW 82-2, BE ACCEPTED AND THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THROUGHTHE CITY MANAGER TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT TO COVER MORE ROADWAY CHIP SEALING, AT A UNIT PRICE OF $0 . 55 PER SQUARE YARD, PLUS STRIPING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL, WITH THE TOTAL EXPENDITURE NOT TO EXCEED $112,000. 00. �U'�1�� n,PACHFdG Pi/ 6 . 'iRIZOw' ache unction April 15, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: PROJECT NO. PW-82-1 REDESIGN OF ADMINISTRATION OFFICE AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM On March 14-19, 1982, a legal advertisement was placed in the Mesa Tribune requesting bids for the redesign and modification of the existing air conditioning system in the Administration Building. Several companies picked up the bid packets but only two actually submitted a bid. A third company submitted a package after the deadline which was returned to them unopened as indicated in the legal advertisement. Attached is a copy of the legal advertisement as well as the recommendation from the Building Official . If you should have questions, please direct them to Leo Frazier, Jr. , Building Official . ✓a��c'�'-�-L��/L-,tom= �/ Kathleen Connelly City Clerk Approver for Agenda KC/lvc / Pats Ifsm #, / Fir+ Reading Attachments Second Reading ..v. Public Hearing Old Business New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 eACH�J O .:u � .r`s 0 Z I _ `liPIP it y o pace unction NOTICE INVITING BID PROPOSALS PROJECT NO PTW-82-1 ,- REDESIGN AND MODIFICATION - AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING The City of Apache Junction, Arizona, invites sealed bids for: REDESIGN AND MODIFICATION OF THE AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR THE CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Bid forms , plans and specifications are available in the office of the Building Official , 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, 85220. Sealed bids will be received in the City Clerk' s office until 2 .00 PM, April 8 , 1982 , at which time and place the bids will be opened and read as a matter of public information. Any bids received after the closing time will be returned unopened. Each bidder shall provide such information as may be required by the City as evidence that he is qualified to provide the materials , labor, transportation, equipment or services required. Each bid shall be submitted on the proposal forms furnished. Envelopes should be sealed and addressed to the City Clerk at the above address Envelopes shall be marked "Bid for Project No . PW-82-1 REDESIGN AND MODIFICATION OF AIR CON- DITIONING SYSTEM FOR CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. " A cashier' s check or surety bond for five-percent (5%) of the amount of the bid must accompany each proposal , payable to the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. Forms for submitting the Surety Bond will be provided. Additional information may be obtained from the City Building Official at 982-8002 . �f- Kathleen Connelly City Clerk 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ..... .... , \\\ PQACHF do 8, ,,,c,,,,,,,,,,,,,!,, Z!oNP Wily o, cpache 09unction April 12, 1982 TO: City Manager THRU: Director of Public Worktc s \' IC�UL /; /� FROM: Building Official RE: PW-82-1 Redesigning of Administration Bldg/Air Conditioning System Both bids for modification of the Administration Building, air conditioning system have been carefully reviewed. The low bid of $2,875.00 was submitted by Ferrin Brother's Air Conditioning of Mesa. Review of Ferrin Brother's bid reveals that they did not design their proposed system in accordance with the specifications. Further, they failed to provide a drawing showing duct sizes, run sizes, boot sizes and grill/register sizes and locations, as specified in the bid packet. The second bid, of $4,971.00, was submitted by Isley's Refrigeration Inc. , of Mesa. Review of their bid shows a well balanced system designed in compliance with the plans and specifications contained in the bid packet. Considering that over 30 days notice was given inviting bids and that only 2 bidders responded out of 10 packets picked up and that Isley's bid meets the specifications: I recommend awarding the bid to Isley's Refrigeration, Inc. LF:llo 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHE✓G (-- U z .� ' z q,pIZO‘AP Witt' o c pache 02unctian AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM .•. FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING APRIL 8, 1982 Those Present: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Leo Frazier, Zoning Administrator Lori Clark, Aministrative Secretary Ferrin Brothers Air Conditioning On March 14, 1982 through March 19, 1982, a public notice was published in the Mesa Tribune inviting bid proposals for the redesign and modification of the air conditioning system for the City Administration building. The written bids were to be submitted by 2:00 p.m. , April 8, 1982, in compliance with bid specifications and the total amount of the bid. The bids, opened and read by the City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, were as follows: Ferrin Brothers AirConditioning Surety Bond $125.00 Bid Amount. Cash 20.00 $2875.00 Guy Isley's Refrigeration, Inc. United States Fidelity $4971.00 ''.. and Guaranty Co. Surety Bond for 5% of bid amount .?. .•(,e—x____. d-,_)7,1%--- Kathleen Connelly City Clerk WITNESS: LTL_( &LI ,/ ---- __*i.) , /Zi.--zii /I ,/ ` c on Clark Leo Frazier, Administrative Secretary Zoning Administrator Building Official 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAP, DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH I VICE MAYOR HILL V/ COUNCILMAN HUDSON v COUNCILMAN EIDSON �/ .MAYOR CLARKE UNANFI.OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONTRACT FOR PROJECT PW-82-1 REDESIGN AND MODIFICATION OF AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, BE AND HEREBY IS AWARDED TO ISLEY'S REFRIGERATION, INC . , 2225 WEST MAIN STREET, MESA, ARIZONA, 85201, IN THE AMOUNT OF $4971. 00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT ISLEY 'S REFRIGERATION INC . , SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE BID PACKAGE FOR PROJECT PW-82-1 AND SHALL HAVE ALL WORK SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED BY JUNE 5, 1982. I W 0 ' °' , ' Z x q,p,Z00' 'Oily a (94pac/ e 2unctian April 9, 1982 Approver for Agenda_1`-'�.:...._,,, Date , tfsm # MEMORANDUM First Reading _;�;..L.. -.. ..✓ TO Mayor and Counci l �� W_..._....... THROUGH. City Manager Second Reading FROM: Rosemary Montgomery II ,/�%;c✓ Public Hearing _____ Old Business SUBJECT: AUDIT SELECTION COMMITTEE REPORT ✓New Business The Audit Selection Committee met on April 2, 1982 for the purpose of selecting an audit firm for the city's annual audit. After careful analysis of the bids , the committee unanimously recommended the audit firm of: Henry and Horne The following firms ranked in the order of total scoring, to provide the City of Apache Junction with professional audit capabilities : 1 +- Henry and Horne $ 6,936. 29.5 man days or 236 hours at average per hour cost of $29.39 (senior level participation 19 days) 2 - Richard C. Denen, Ltd. $ 5,880. 30.5 man days or 244 hours at average per hour cost of $24.10 (senior level participation 14.5 days) 3 - Coopers and Lybrand $ 6,950. 30 man days or 240 hours at average per hour ,,^ cost of $28.96 (senior level participation 7 days) 4 - Arthur Anderson and Company $ 7,000. 36.5 man days or 292 hours at average per hour cost of $23.97 (senior level participation 6.5 days) 5 - Main Hurdman $ 8,490. 29 man days or 232 hours at average per hour cost of $36.59 (senior level participation 5 days) 6 - Arthur Young and Company $ 9,500. 29 man days or 232 hours at average per hour cost of $40.95 (senior level participation 13 days) 7- Bolan, Vassar and Barrows $ 4,100. 17 man days or 136 hours at average per hour cost of $30.15 (senior level participation 11 days) 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 AUDIT SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Robert E DeBow President of Copper State Bank John A Blackburn Executive Director of CAAG Lt. M E Weiskotten Department of Public Safety J James Tuvell City Manager Rosemary Montgomery Finance Officer ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: "(A- S" SECONDED BY; YES NO ABSTAINED COl1NCIl MANEAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNC I_l N'Atd HUD ON ✓ MAYOR CLARKE \ic jII GF MAYOR HILL / ,._COUNCILMAN. STFELSMITH �j l h UNANI"" S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONTRACT FOR THE CITY 'S ANNUAL AUDIT BE AWARDED TO �eiYJrt/ L , IN THE AMOUNT OF ` / JCv. b v l E ... QACH ✓ - , 0 ' 3 'Z ZOVI wit c • 4 ac/ie �- unction DATE: April 13, 1982 ,..mit, MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Engineer THRU: City Manager Director of Public Works REGARDING: Development Guide (Agenda item) Attached is a copy of the City of Apache Junction Development Guide, in final form. The Development Guide is a working tool for architects , engineers , developers, etc . , in making plans for construction of private develop- ment in Apache Junction. It spells out requirements for construction plans, design criteria, drainage, utilities, and construction agreements . When published , the Guide allows the developer ' s designers to "know the rules" at the outset and to present plans which are close to accept- able on the first submittal. The Guide has been reviewed and endorsed by the Development Coordinating Committee , water companies , City staff, and a local Consulting Engineer. It closely parallels similar guides promulgated by other cities . We ask that the Mayor and the Council study the Guide at their pleasure and ask any questions deemed nece- ssary of the City Engineer . It is our intention to open the Guide to a thirty (30) day study period by the Council and local interest groups. At the end of the period, we will ask the Mayor and the City Council to adopt the Development Guide by Minute Action . Approver for Agenda_ ::..,._� tem.1 Fin+Reading 7 piffle,�'.f `' AMA/s h Second Reading _..___—W _. Public Hearing 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHC3 1�12) 2'- 2 --..... New Business %.*, APACHE JUNCTION "mrim GUIDE PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL O� PeA ` �✓G�' ((35qe�� xx^J4 \ amq gR!ZONP CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD `' Telephone 982-8002 L Date AM TABLE OF CONTENTS Tentative Development Schedule Page 1 General Information 2 Improvement Plans emir. A. Cover Sheets 4 B. Plan and Profile 7 Check List: A. Streets 8 B. Sewer 10 C. Water 12 D. Storm Drainage I. Preliminary Subdivision Review 14 II. Final Subdivision Review 14 III. Commercial Site Drainage 16 Storm Drainage Policy I. Residential Subdivisions 17 a. Retention Basin Guidelines 17 II. Commercial 18 III. Hydrology Reports 18 Flood Plain Management 22 Landscaping 24 .40106., Improvement Security 25 Final Inspection and Acceptance of Improvements 26 Plans Format/Drafting Procedure Federal-Aid Projects 27 EXHIBITS Runoff & Storm Drain Sizing Charts A thru G Landscaping Maintenance Agreement H(1) & H(2) Assurance for Construction of Improvements I Date DEVELOPMENT Developer: Consulting Engr: -- TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Start Complete Actual Actual Date Date Start Comolete Remarks PRE-FINAL RECORDED PLAT WATER PLANS SEWER PLANS PAVING PLANS A MOVE DIRT PRE-FINAL GRADE PLACE SEWER PLACE WAlr.R RE-STAKE CONTROL 1. PLACE POWER PLACE TELEPHONE - ` PLACE GAS PLACE CURBS PAVING START OF HOUSING Please provide the name and telephone number of the person responsible for coordinating this development. NAME TELEPHONE NUt•iBER 1. IMIbk AIM - GENERAL INFORMATION - 1. The Developer must comply with all requirements of the City of Apache Junction Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable ordinances, rules or regulations. 2. All designs must be in accordance with the 1979 Uniform Standard Details and Specifications published by the Maricopa Association of Governments as amended by the City of Apache Junction. Am. 3. Dedication of street rights-of-way or utility easements must be coordinated through the Engineering Department. 4. All utility designs must be in accordance with City Codes, utility company standards and the latest State and County Health Department requirements and approved by all agencies prior to the issuance of the City Permit. 5. The Developer is required to contact private water companies, Mountain Bell, Arizona Public Service and Salt River Project for locations of existing and proposed water mains, buried conduit, gas or cable. Locations must be shown on plans to reduce the possibility of conflict and damage. Conflicts arising from failure to do this shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 6. Where it is determined that a contractor is working on a project without a permit or an official set of stamped, approved drawings by the City of Apache Junction Engineering Department or Building Department, a Stop Work Order will be issued. 7. The Developer shall provide three (3) completed sets of plans for all reviews. 8. Where the project is in conjunction with a planned development, apartment, townhouse or commercial property, three (3) sets of plans should be submitted to the Division of Building Inspection along with the on-site plans. DO NOT SUBMIT PLANS DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING if project is a combination on-site and p off-site project. 9. The Developer should not submit preliminary plans unless previously arranged with the City Engineer or Zoning Administrator. 10. The Contractor shall notify El Paso Natural Gas District Superintendent in Phoenix, Arizona (telephone (602) 967-1686) 48 hours prior to commencing construction in the vicinity of El Paso Natural Gas right-of-way in order that El Paso may have a representative present at all times. 11. Final plat and improvement plans shall be submitted for only that area intended to be constructed. Phasing the final plat and improvement plans will not be allowed. 12. A description for "unplatted" easements, rights-of-way, or parcels upon which improvements are being constructed shall be prepared by a registered Engineer or land surveyor licensed in the State of Arizona, signed by the owner and submitted on a form provided by the City to the City Engineer for review and processing. 2. - GENERAL INFORMATION - (cont'd) 13. The Developer shall review all comments made by City departments and make appropriate corrections where required. 14. Street lights are required on all public streets within and adjacent to t the proposed project. The Developer shall initiate a request to the Engineering Department to create a street light improvement district. 15. The Developer is to provide assurance, in a form acceptable to the city, from his financial lender, guaranteeing the off-site improvements. The Developers engineer is to provide construction cost estimates to sub- stantiate the amount, which must be approved by the City Engineer. 16. The improvement plans must include a general master utility layout for the subdivision as one (1) of the front sheets in the total set of plans. 17. The Developer is to provide a copy of the project soil investigation for city review. Any areas of expansive soil will require special treatment during project construction. The Developers engineer shall note these areas and special requirements on the plans. 18. The Developers engineer shall prepare plans in conjunction with horizontal and vertical datum as provided by the City of Apache Junction. 19. Benchmarks and temporary benchmarks shall be indicated on each sheet of the improvement plans. 20. Horizontal coordinates shall be indicated on the final plat at all sub- division boundaries and indicating lot areas, street areas and tract areas shall be provided in square feet and acres. A subtotal and total of all streets, lots and tracts are to be included. 3. Ask Amk - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Front or Cover Sheets (24 inches by 36 inches) t 1. Small "location" map. 2. Small scale subdivision and sheet index map. 3. List of quantities. 4. Engineer's seal and stamp or approval on each sheet. 5. Location provided for signature of approval for the State and/or County Health Departments. 6. List typical street and alley cross-sections for each situation. Draw typical section for each case not covered by the above standard details and specify fog seal, asphalt mix and base required. 7. List all "City" benchmarks used on this project. (Contact Engineer- ing Department for location and elevation.) Take crossties to Salt River Valley Water Users Association, State, USCGS, G.L.O. and County benchmarks if they are within or adjacent to the project. 8. If details are shown, indicate to which sheet they refer. 9. The following general notes shall be included: A. All work and materials shall conform to the latest Editions of the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAC) Uniform Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction. ilakk B. Exact point of matching termination and overlay, if necessary, shall be confirmed in the field by the City Engineer. C. All frames, covers, valve boxes and manholes shall be adjusted to finish grade. D. Construction shall begin when underground utility conflicts have been resolved. E. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to arrange for the relocation and relocation costs of all utilities, and submit a utility relocation schedule. F. All work and materials which do not conform to the approved plans and specifications are subject to removal and replacement at the contractor's expense. 4. i Ad•. .%. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - G. The City Engineer may direct the placement of excess material taken from streets during pregrading. H. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to locate and protect all utilities or structures. AO.ok I. At least 48 hours prior to excavating in the vicinity of any utility, the contractor shall contact the utility's locating service for field assistance. (Blue stakes - Tel. 263-1100) J. Dust shall be controlled by watering per air pollution control district of Pinal County. Contractor shall obtain necessary permits. K. All construction water and power shall be obtained and handled by the contractor at his own expense The contractor shall make his own arrangements to procure and transport water to the construction site. All temporary facilities shall be removed prior to final acceptance by the City. L. Approval is for one year time only. If construction work is not started within one year, the plans shall be brought up to current standards and resubmitted for City approval. M. The City Engineer shall be notified 24 hours prior to any construction work. N. Acceptance of the completed right-of-way improvements will not be given until: a.) Reproducible "as-built" plans have been submitted by a ,.. Registered Professional Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. When the City Engineer provides inspection, the owner's Registered Engineer shall seal the plans and shall certify that staking was performed under his super- vision and that the "as-built" elevations and dimensions shown on the plans are correct. b.) The owners Registered Engineer shall have certified in writing as to the location and accuracy of all survey monuments. c.) All test reports meeting M.A.G. specifications for compaction and materials are submitted and approved by the City Engineer. • 0. The contractor shall comply with the provisions for traffic controls and barricading as per City of Mesa Traffic Barricade Manual. 5. Aft. Aft. • - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - P. Driveway locations shall be confirmed or approved by the City prior to or during curb construction. The contractor and developer shall be responsible for coordinating the locations for driveways to avoid conflict with utility services. Q. All gutter grades less than 0.32% must be staked at 15'intervals along the gutter alignment and checked by the City Inspector immediately preceding the pouring of concrete. R. The contractor shall obtain any and all permits required unless otherwise noted. S. Deviations from the approved plan must be approved in writing by the City Engineer prior to scheduling construction. 6. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - PLAN (24 inches by 36 inches) 1. The scale shall not exceed one (1) inch equals 40 feet (horizontal) . f 2. Plans must show sizes, types and locations for all existing and new utilities, including services, paving curb, sidewalk, fire hydrants, valves, manholes, and all miscellaneous items of construction; such as street sign posts, driveways, etc. . 3. Submit 3 copies of all drawings for review. One set will be returned with red-lined comments. 4. Where gas is to be installed, separate lines for gas main and service must be shown and labeled on each drawing. 5. Clearly differentiate between new and old improvements, ie. , (existing 6-inch ACP vs. new 6-inch ACP. Also, shade pavement, etc.) . 6. When street grades exceed two percent (0.02 ft. /ft.) separate profiles or plan and profile will be required. Vertical scale shall not exceed one (1) inch equals four (4) feet. 7. Final approval and signature will be given only after all other reviewing agencies (County, Health Dept. , Water Com- pany, etc.) have signed the originals. Submit originals and paper reproducible copies for City signature. The reproducible copies will be retained by the City. 8. Reproducible "as-built" plans shall be minimum .003" thick Mylar photocopies or Mylar sepias, able to reproduce legible blueline copies. (See page 27.) 7. - IMPROVEMENT PLAN - Streets 1 . Standard width: Section line street : 64 ' full width; Mid- line streets : 50' full width; Collector streets ; 42 ' full width; Residential streets ; 32 ' full width . All widths to back of curb . 2. Minimum gutter grade in the City of Apache Junction is 0.0032. Special • approval by the City Engineer is required for grades less than 0.0032. 3. Clearly mark grade changes and grade breaks. 4. Show all horizontal and vertical curve information on the plan. 5. Valley gutters shall have a minimum (0.25) drop across intersections, 6. Curb returns shall have a minimum (0.1) drop. 7. "Grade to daylight" or provide catch basins at the end of new paving projects where necessary. Also provide barricades or delineators where there are traffic hazards immediately following end of project paving. 8. City requires pavement cross-slopes in streets at 0.020'/feet of pave- ment width. (Example: A half street, 14 feet wide (pavement) requires 0.28' crown from centerline of street to lip of gutter.) 9. Six inch (6") thick sidewalk is required for alley and commercial drive- way entrances. All other sidewalks are to be four inches (4") thick. 10. Minimum curb return radii: (Back of curb) residential twenty feet (20') , Collector twenty-five feet (25' ) , Mid-section line thirty feet (30') , Section line thirty-five feet (35' ) . 11. Survey monuments are required at all centerline control points (Brass- caps in concrete) . Section corners and quarter corners require brass- caps to be set in concrete and in handholes. 12. Show sufficient pavement tapers at beginning and end of projects to properly channel traffic back to original or new alignment. Tapers shall be of temporary construction consisting of at least two inch (2") asphalt course over six inch (6") ABC. (Tapers shall be installed at 20:1 and are to be sawcut and removed when pavement is extended.) 13 . Show and label the installation of street sign posts at each intersection . (Locations normally coincide with the corner where a STOP sign would be located . ) 14 . Perform a complete field survey and show all existing topo- graphy and what is to be done with it . (Power poles , trees , ditches , and etc . ) 15. Any curb with less than the 0. 32% gutter grade must have a note on the cover sheet , requiring staking along the actual gutter alignment (not offset) and must be checked by the City Inspector immediately preceding the pouring of concrete. r. ^ - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Streets (Cont ' d) 16 . Plans must show installation of a four-inch (4") ABC in alleys or paved (2"A/C over 4" ABC) if to be used as access for resi- t dential access or 2" A/C over 6" ABC if used as commercial access to accommodate truck traffic . 17 . Provide sufficient sight clearance where necessary , such as /'\ removal of existing obstructions at or near an intersection. 18 . All driveway widths and locations shall be indicated on plan where vertical curb is to be installed. 19 . If your project calls for widening an existing pavement to include a new curb and gutter ; be sure elevation shots are provided along the monument line, the sawcut line of the existing new pavement match-point and the gutterline of the proposed curb. 20. Provide ramps for handicapped at all curb returns . 21. Vertical curb (6" face) is required on section and mid-section line streets . Vertical curb shall also be provided on collect- or and residential streets if required to meet hydrologic requ- irements . Roll curb and gutter may be used on residential streets , providing no vertical curb patterns have been install- ed in adjacent developed areas on that street alignment . 22 . Sidewalks shall be 5 ' wide on section line streets and 4 ' wide on all other streets . Meandering sidewalks may be appr- oved on a case-by-case basis . 9. A SEWER (When Appropriate) NOTE: The City does not have a sewerage distribution system or treat- ment plant at this time. However , if a system is designed to meet the criteria below the City may accept systems , in public streets , for future maintenance, if and when a municipal system is constr- ucted. • im1b 1. All sewer designs and construction must conform to the Arizona Department of Health Services Engineering Bulletin 11 (latest edition) , unless more stringent controls are required by this guide . 2 . Show both on plan and profile the concrete encasement of sewer lines where necessary. 3. Each lot or parcel must be provided with its own individual sewer/septic service unless otherwise approved. The location should be coordinated so as to avoid placement in conflict with proposed driveway locations and possible future pool locations . 4 . A note must be on plans for "Contractor to verify elevation of existing sewer stub before proceeding with balance of sewer trenching" . 5 . The future need for sewer in the surrounding area with regards to your present design slopes and depth must be considered . 6. In the profile, show the relationship between sewer mains and water mains at each crossing. 7. Both the slope and the end elevation must be shown on all .•. sewer main stubs. 8. Developer ' s engineer is to furnish cut sheets on all sewer main stubs. 9. Sewer mains shall be low enough to avoid conflicts with all other utilities (water services , telephone company , electric , gas , storm drains , etc. ) and must have a minimum four (4) feet of cover to finished grade. 10. Prior to submitting subdivision improvement plans , a prelim- inary master plan of the sewer with sizes , slopes, manhole flow lines and natural grades should be submitted for review on the preliminary plat for subdivision review. Also provide details and specification of sewerage treatment and/or septic facilities . 11 . Final improvement plans will detail sewerage treatment facilities and indicate provisions for security , operation and maintenance by the owner. (Not required for individual septic tank install- ations) . 10. SEWER (Cont ' d) 12. Minimum cover over crown of lateral sewer to be minimum of four feet (4 ' ) at the property line. 13 . Manhole diameter to be four feet (4 ' ) , providing sewer is a lateral line . 14 . If the manhole is on a trunk line, main, or branch line , and more than ten feet (10' ) deep , or the line is over twelve inches (12") in diameter, the manhole is to be five feet (5 ' ) in diameter. 15. When a line is extended, but not to the design location for a manhole, a temporary cleanout is acceptable. MINIMUM SLOPES Line Size Min. Design Slopes 4" (taps) . 0050 6" . 0050 8" . 0033 10" .0024 12" . 0019 15" . 0014 NOTE: Other slopes as approved by the City Engineer. CURVED SEWERS Minimum radius 500 feet . Maximum distance between manholes 400 feet , and at each end of the curve. LATERALS a) May have maximum drop of 24-inches (24") without use of drop connection. b) Insure 0. 10 drop in manholes of 90° bends . c) Use single wyes only. No double wyes . 11. Auk WATER NOTE: The City does not own or operate water distribution systems at this time. However, the following items are jointly required by the City and private utility companies for approval. 1. All water lines to be ACP. • 2 . All water line design and construction to conform to the Arizona Department of Health Services Engineering Bulletin 10 (latest edition) , unless more stringent controls are required by this guide. 3. Valves at intersections shall be placed opposite the PC of curb returns in such a manner that not more than one hydrant shall be shut-down at any one time. 4. A note is required on the plans : "The Contractor shall be re- quired to install a night tie-in for any new water line that will affect existing service in the opinion of the water company. " 5 . Show water line in a separate trench from other utilities . 6. Review future water extension problems with respect to proposed lines and valves to prevent loss of service to customers . 7 . Fire hydrants are to be placed as indicated by the Fire Chief on a review plan submitted to him by the developer. 8 . Normal placement of water mains shall be one-foot (1 ' ) behind sidewalks on the east or north side of streets . In the case of special half-street situations or unusual conditions , locations shall be confirmed by the Fire Chief, City Engineer, and utility prior to the preparation of plans (unless other- .... wise specified by the appropriate water company) . 9. Valves on dead end lines shall be placed to cause the least amount of inconvenience to existing services when the line is extended. If the valve is to be placed near the end of the stub, there should be at least two (2) full joints of pipe between the valve and the plug. 10. If a fire hydrant is on a dead end line it will require that the line be at least a six inch (6") line up to the hydrant . If more than one hydrant is required on a dead-end line, the line shall be a minimum of eight inches (8") in diameter . 11. Water line sizes shall be determined by the appropriate water company on a review plan submitted to the company by the developer . 12 . - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Water (cont'd) 12. Valves on dead end lines shall be placed to cause the least amount of inconvenience to existing services when the line is extended. If the valve is to be placed near the end of the stub, there should be at least two (2) full joints of pipe between the valve and the plug for lines twelve-inches (12") and larger. • One (1) full Joint should be installed between valve and plug for lines smaller than twelve-inches (12") . 13. If a fire hydrant is on a dead end line it will require that the line be at least an six-inch (6") line up to the hydrant. If the line is to be extended at least an eight-inch (8") line is re- quired. 14. Thrust blocking shall be provided as per M.A.G. Details and Specifications. 13. Auk Amt. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Storm Drainage I. Preliminary Subdivision Review 1. Submit preliminary drainage report. 2. Show limits of on-site drainage areas and off-site watersheds. ice► 3. Show existing drainage structures such as waste or delivery ditches, channels, etc. 4. What will be done with existing drainage structures? 5. Submit a plat showing drainage pattern of all streets in the subdivision. 6. What is the required retention? ac. ft. 7. What is the retention provided? ac. ft. 8. What is the approximate size and depth of the required basin? x x . (Maximum depth allowed is three and one half feet (3.5) - Maximum side slope 4:1) . 9. What method is available for draining the basin in 36 hours? gravity flow into rate pumped into rate drywells, number approx. depth 10. How will basin be maintained? private homeowner ,,.i, homeowners association other 11. Is it clear what will be done with the storm run-off? 12. Are any special easements needed for pipes, ditches, temporary basins, etc.? II. Final Subdivision Drainage Review * 1. Has a final drainage report been included with the submittal of final plans? 2. Is a plat showing peak street flows and drainage areas included? 3. Are storm drain sizing calculations included? *NOTE. See Storm Drainage Policy for further information. 14. • - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Storm Drainage (cont'd) II. (Final Subdivision Drainage Review cont'd.) 4. Are catch basin calculations included? • 5. Is a detail drawing of retention basin grading shown? • 6. What is the required volume? ac.ft. 7. What is the calculated volume? ac.ft. 8. Are inlet and outlet structures shown? 9. Is lot grading plan included? 10. Method of draining basin in 36 hours? gravity flow into rate pumped into rate drywell, number depth 11. How is basin being maintained? 12. On-lot retention for single family lots will not be allowed unless conditions warrant special consideration as determined by the City Engineer. On-site retention must be accompanied by storm drainage covenants, prepared by the Developer's engineer for all lots or areas that are to retain drainage. This covenant is to be signed by the Developer or Owner and recorded with the subdivision plat. 13. The engineering drawings must designate the type of storm ^ drain pipe to be used including size and slope. Use the following as a guide for choosing pipe required in different situations. A. Reinforced pipe (RCP 36 inches inside diameter or larger and RGRCP any diameter) may be used in all situations. The engineering drawings shall designate the Class of D-load specifications as per ASTM -C-76 and when requested the engineer shall verify his choice of pipe with load computations. • B. Non-reinforced pipe (RGCP) - may be used in easements outside the limits of paving, sidewalks, or alleys. The engineering drawings shall designate the class of pipe as per ASTM-C-14 and the engineer is required to provide load calculations to justify the use of this pipe. 15. AM bk IOW - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Storm Drainage (cont`d) III. Commercial Site Drainage and all other Development not previously mentioned. 1. Have all property lines, proposed or existing buildings, asphalt, grass, desert landscape and concrete areas been shown and the dimensions of same? 2. Are all existing grades shown, either by a grid method or contour lines especially at property lines, driveways and sidewalks? 3. Has the finished grade of all surfaces been indicated? 4. Is the finished floor elevation shown? 5. Is the direction of roof drainage shown? 6. Are all items of construction that will affect drainage shown? 7. Is the lot divided into drainage areas and calculations shown for runoff and retention of each area? 8. Were the correct runoff coefficients used? 9. What method of draining the retention area is provided? 16. Auk STORM DRAINAGE POLICY I. RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS A. All water which falls within the subdivision from a ten-year (10) storm of 24 hour duration, (approximately 2.4 inches) , • must be retained within the boundaries of that subdivision. The method of retention is left up to the developer and requires the approval of the City Engineer. Two (2) or more developers may join together to provide a larger retention facility to accomodate the runoff for more than one (1) subdivision if all other criteria are met. B. Streets must be constructed to carry the runoff from a ten-year (10) storm between the curbs. In cases where the peak flows from the design storm exceed the street capacity, underground pipes of sufficient size to carry the excess must be installed. Storm drains when designed as independent structures shall accomo- date a 10-year (10) storm. -See attached Capacity Chart (Exhibit A) . C. The peak flows from a 100-year (100) storm must be carried within the cross section between finished grade at buildings. (Front yards and street) D. 1. Retention basins are permitted to a maximum of three and one half feet (3.5) in depth and must be constructed so that rainwater will stand no longer than 36 hours from the end of the storm. Except in special circumstances, they must be drained by pumping or controlled gravity flow. 2. PROPOSED WATER RETENTION BASINS IN SALT RIVER PROJECT TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHTS-OF-WAY: a. Retention basins are to be rectangular in design with a maximum slope of 2:1 on all four sides. b. The top of the slope must be a minimum of fifty feet (50) from the legs of a tower or the edge of a pole. c. The dirt slope adjacent to the tower or pole must be protected either with sod, gunite, gabion, rip-rap, or plastic sheets with rock covering. d. If a water flow is required between any two retention basins, it must be constructed of pipe. An open lateral ditch is not acceptable. e. Trees will be limited to those with a mature height of fifteen feet (15) . f. Developer shall submit drawings to the City and Salt River Project for approval. When approved by Salt River Project, a letter shall be forwarded to the City. 17. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd) E. Where practical, it is recommended that retention areas be made a part of a privately owned lot and covered by a drainage easement. If the basin retains water from a subdivision which has a co-oper- ative type homeowners association, the maintenance of this basin must be done by the association. If the basin is to be constructed on a parcel of land which will not be sold and the maintenance responsibilities of which are not specifically defined, it will be necessary for the developer to install complete improvements on the Air parcel and to make necessary provisions for its continuous mainten- ance. F. Existing major water courses shall be maintained and dedicated as drainage ways and shall not be altered from their natural locations at the perimeter of the project. Street crossings for these water courses shall be sized for a 10-year flood event. Refer to Bureau of Public Roads Hydraulic Engineering Circular #5, September, 1961. II. COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, RESIDENTIAL (EXCEPT INDIVIDUAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES) . A. All storm water from a 10-year storm of twenty-four (24) hour duration (approximately 2.4 inches) must be retained on-site. (Includes street areas.) B. There must be some method of draining all retention areas within 36 hours. Percolation by surface spreading in a landscape area is an acceptable method, if the 10-year storm creates no more than twelve inches (12") ponding on the landscape area. Dry wells are not desirable, but may be acceptable providing percolation tests are submitted and approval of the City Engineer is obtained. III. HYDROLOGY REPORTS A. Commercial and all other development not previously mentioned. 1. Submit a site plan which shows the following: a. All proposed buildings, asphalt, grass, concrete or desert landscape and dimensions of same. b. Existing and finished grades of all surfaces (especially finished floor elevations) and at property lines and back of sidewalks. 2. Compute the amount of runoff to be retained by dividing the site into individual drainage areas and applying the follow- ing formula to each area. Submit all calculations for review. 18. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd.) Volume of Runoff = Area in SQ. FT. x 0 20 x C (cu.ft.) Where C = .95 concrete C = .85 building roof or asphalt • C = .70 desert landscaping C = .25 bare ground C = .15 grass landscaping 3. Provide retention for volume of water as found in 2 above. It is recommended that parking areas be graded to drain toward a landscaped area. When this is done, a light rain will drain away with little or no ponding on the paved surface. A storm of greater intensity will back up on the pavement, but the water should recede before it can damage the parking lot surface. 4. Provide some method of draining the retention volume by sur- facing spreading in a landscape area or a controlled connection to a wash or storm drain. Drywells are permitted when approved by the City Engineer, if no other solution can be found. B. Residential Subdivisions 1. Preliminary Reports a. A preliminary drainage report must be presented with the application for preliminary subdivision review. No engin- eering review will be scheduled without this report. This report shall be on separate, letter-size sheets with any necessary maps. Handwritten comments on a plan sheet are not acceptable. b. Delineate the boundaries of the drainage area or watershed. If the subdivision is subject to off-site drainage, include the applicable off-site areas. c. Indicate any existing drainage or irrigation structures such as: waste or delivery ditches, natural drainage channels, etc., and what will be done with them. d. Indicate on a plat drawing the drainage pattern of all streets. e. Indicate the retention volume required and present a preliminary retention basin plan including size, depth and method of draining it. f. Maximum depth of basin shall not exceed three and one half (3.5) feet. g. Indicate proposed maintenance and method of draining the basin in 36 hours. 19. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd.) III. HYDROLOGY REPORTS (Cont'd) 2. Final Reports a. A final hydrology report must be submitted with the initial submittal with the engineering plans. Report shall be on letter-size sheets with necessary maps neatly folded, all in a binder. b. Justify the runoff factor ("C" factor) used in the comput- ations by taking a typical lot cross-section and computing a weighted runoff factor using the following coefficients: Concrete Pavement . . . .95% Asphaltic Pavement. . . .85% Building Roofs 857 Desert Landscape . . . . 70% Bare Ground 25% Grass Landscape . . . 15% c. A map is to accompany the report which delineates clearly the different areas to be considered and labels by number the different critical points or where inlets are to be located. d. Each sub-area is to be analyzed for the peak flow generated by a ten (10) year storm on the chart labeled "Peak Flow from Sub-Areas". Use the velocities for time of concentration and intensity charts found in this guide. Use the rational method, as presented in the Arizona Highway Department Manual: "Hydrologic Design for Highway Drainage". e. Place inlets wherever the flow exceeds the street capacity .�. according to the charts in this guide. The inlets are to be analyzed separately and catch basin computations shall be submitted. f. Size the storm drains and submit design computations if applicable g. If storm runoff flows onto the property to be subdivided from adjacent properties, this must be included in detail, in the report. Drainage area, calculated peak flows, and other pertinent runoff data must be presented. If the flow is in a defined channel, the channel must be improved. An eight (8) foot bottom to accommodate maintenance vehicles is required. Special consideration of the use of open channels is to be given on each individual project, by the City Engineer. The runoff from areas outside the subdivision may be carried through the new subdivision. 20. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd) III. HYDROLOGY REPORTS (Cont'd.) B. 2. Final reports (coned) h. Compute the amount of retention volume required using • the following formula: Drainage Area (acres) x C x .20 = retention volume AC-FT. 1. Clarify responsibility and maintenance of the basin. J . Clarify the method of draining the basin in 36 hours . Except in special circumstances as approved by the City Engineer, they shall be drained by pumping or con- trolled gravity flow. C. Use design charts and forms as provided herein. 21. a VII Flood Plain Management The City of Apache Junction having entered into the Flood Insurance Program by resolution 79-41 adopted on November 7, 1979, is required to provide adequate flood plain management and control measures, with effective enforcement, consistant with criteria set forth by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and section 1910 of the National Flood Insurance Program Regulations. This action allows the community to acquire federally subsidized flood insurance, provides for local flood plain management, allows for a unified national program for managing flood losses and provides for safer living conditions. A copy of the Federal register dated October 26, 1976, reprinted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development - Federal Insurance Administration - National Flood Insurance Program, is on file with the City Planning Director, Zoning Administrator and City Engineer. The following excerpts are taken from the referenced Federal Register: 1. Flood Insurance shall not be sold or renewed unless the community has adopted and uniformly enforces adequate minimum flood plain management regulations. 2. Requires building sites will be reasonably safe from flooding and constructed to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement, with materials resistant to flood damage and by methods to minimize flood damage. Specific requirements are provided for mobile homes and trailers. 3. Requires public utilities (includes septic systems) and facilities to be constructed to minimize flood damage and prevent infiltration of flood waters and systems contamination. 4. Requires confirmation that alteration or relocation of a watercourse (wash) does not adversley effect upstream and down stream properties. 5. Requires assurances that the flood carrying capacity within altered or relocated portions of watercourses (washes) are maintained. 6. Requires evacuation plan and alternate vehicular access and escape routes be provided in Arizona. 7. Requires a Registered professional engineer or architect shall certify that flood proofing methods are adequate to withstand the flood depths, pressures, velocities, impact, up-lift forces and other factors associated with the base flood elevation. 8. Requires compliance by new construction or expansion by existing developments or when repair, reconstruction or improvement equals or exceeds fifty (507) percent of the value of the existing development. 9. Requires all encroachments, including fill, new construction be prohibited so as not to increase the base flood elevation more than one foot at any point. 22. Flood Plain Management (cont'd) 10. Requires the placement of new mobile home placement be prohibited within regulatory floodways. 11. Variances: a. Granting a variances is generally limited to lot sizes of less than one half (2) acre. b. Variances shall not be issued within a designated floodway if any increase in flood levels would result. c. Variances shall only be issued with a showing of good and suffi- cient cause and exceptional hardship, providing the variance will not result in increased flood heights, threats to public safety, public expense, nuisances or conflicts. d. Variances will result in increased premium rates for flood insur- ance as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage. 12. Suspension of the community flood insurance program will result for failure to adopt or enforce flood plain management regulations. In order to comply with Federal requirements Developers and engineers shall provide the City Engineer with the following infor- mation: 1. Confirm what flood zone the development is located within. 2. Confirm the base flood (Q100) elevation. 3. Confirm the lowest floor (including basement) is elevated or flood proofed to or above the base flood level (additional six (6) inch freeboard flood elevation is recommended) . 4. Confirm watercourses enter and leave areas to be developed in their natural locations, and that flows or highwater elevations are not increased to the detriment of upstream and downstream • properties. 5. Insure that hydrologic data is presented in accordance with the storm drainage policy in this guide. 23. VIII LANDSCAPING Ilk All plans for landscaping within the City rights-of-way shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The Developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement on the form provided by the City . ( See Exhibit "H") Landscaping themes already initiated within a quarter mile of the proposed development, should be continued, except as required by the City Engineer . • 24 . IX IMPROVEMENT SECURITY Prior to the construction of street improvements the subdivider/ owner/developer shall provide security by either: (1) posting a performance bond issued by a qualified surety; (2) establishing a cash trust, said funds to be deposited with the City to the credit of the subdivider; (3) depositing with the City a certificate of deposit issued by a banking institu- tion authorized to issue same; or (4) filing with the City an executed letter of assurance or contract of guarantee between the City and a trust company, banking insitution, or other financial institution approved by City, and author- ized to enter into such contracts, (5) the amount of said security is to be based upon the cost estimate prepared by a registered professional civil engineer or licensed contractor in an amount to cover the completed installation of the improve- ments, and requires approval by the City Engineer; •-. (6) a completed date for the improvements shall be declared by the subdivider and the security shall provide for its forfeiture to the City in the event that said improvements were started and have not been completed or not accepted by the City. See Exhibit "I". 25. Final Inspection and Acceptance of Improvements Upon due notice from the developer of presumptive completion of all • improvements as called for on the approved improvement plans, the Adm.. City will make an inspection. If all construction is found to be completed to his satisfaction, then that inspection shall constitute the final inspection and the City Engineer will recommend final ac- ceptance of the public improvements (including street, sewer and drainage improvements) to the City Council upon receipt of the follow- ing items: 1. As-built plans drawn in india ink, or a reproducible linen, mylar or sepia copy thereof, showing all street, drainage and sewer improvements constructed, and copies of the final plans showing all electrical, lighting, gas, telephone, cable television and water improvements constructed within the public rights-of-way or public easements for inclusion in the City's permanent files. Final plans shall show the approved design conditions and re- flect any field changes approved by the City Engineer, and the developer's engineer shall certify that the final plans represent as nearly as possible the actual field conditions as constructed. 2. Affidavit regarding settlement of claims: The developer shall certify that all bills for labor and materials incorporated in the work have been paid and agree to indemnify and save harmless the City against any and all liens, claims of liens, suits, actions, damages, charges and expenses whatsoever, which the '.. City may suffer arising out of the failure of the developer to pay for all labor performed and materials furnished in the con- struction of the required improvements. 3. Guarantee: The developer and contractor shall guarantee all work against defective workmanship or materials for a period of one (1) year from the date of its final acceptance by the Mayor and City Council. • Upon final acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council, the City Engineer will notify the developer in writing of this acceptance as of the date of approval by the Council. 26. PLANS FORMAT AND DRAFTING PROCEL..AE • FOR FEDERAL-AID URBAN SYSTEM STREETS PROJECTS Consultants retained by the City, preparing plans for federal-aid projects shall comply to the latest requirements of the Arizona Department of Transportation. Arizona Department of Transportation Standards as received by the City on February 4, 1981 are as follows. The consultant should confirm these requirements are up to date prior to starting any City project. GENERAL. Detail Plans are prepared to provide the prospective bidder with all details and information necessary to a concise conception of the work to be done; they also provide a gauge for determining that all intents of the improvement have been fulfilled. Workmanship, neatness, accuracy, and attention to detail are coordinated toward ease of reading and singleness of interpretation. PLAN SET FORMAT. All sheets are 22" x 36" overall; reproducible paper, linen, or plastic. Sequence of sheets is as follows: (1) Face Sheet(s) (Provided by ADOT) (2) Design Sheet(s) (3) List of Standards Sheets (Provided by ADOT) (4) Plan Summary Sheet(s) (5) Special Detail Sheet(s) (6) Structure Summary Sheets (If Required) (7) Plan and/or Profile Sheet(s) (8) Earthwork Sheet(s) (If Necessary) (9) Traffic Sheet(s) (If Required) (10) Roadside Development Sheet(s) (If Required) (11) Structures Section Sheet(s) (If Required) (12) Materials Division Sheet(s) (Provided by ADOT) FACE SHEET. Standard sheets are provided by highway designation, each sheet being usable for one or more projects. A location map is centered on the sheet with provision in the lower right corner for FHWA and Departmental approval signatures. Use of the standard Face Sheet(s) requires the addition of the county or counties involved, the project number, and the location shown and exaggerated in red on the map portion of all Preliminary copies as well as the finished reduced-size copy(s) The Face Sheet is illustrated by Standard P-1 .10.1 (Provided by ADOT.) DESIGN SHEET. This sheet(s) shows length of project, index of sheets, general notes, present and design ADT, design speed, and a fully- dimensioned typical roadway cross-section(s) and pavement structure 1"Drafting Standards For Use In Office and Field" 1979, ADOT 27 . AMbk composition. If required, tables are used to show location of changes in select material thickness, or other pavement structure composition thicknesses, additions or deletions, cut ditch dimensions and cut and embankment slopes. Space and number of Plan Summary Sheet items per- mitting, this sheet may also include Plan Summary Sheet information. See Standards P-2. 20, P-2.30, P-4.10. LIST OF STANDARD SHEETS. These sheets are unruled and list all appli- cable roadway Standard Drawings - Construction Details by number, name, and latest revision date. See example, Standard P-3.10. (Pro- • auk vided by ADOT; listed as 2A on Index.) PLAN SUMMARY SHEET. This sheet(s) lists summarized quantities, dimen- sional specifications, and earthwork for all pipe culvert, storm sewer, and drainage-related items except box culverts and bridges, which are subject to Structures Section Standards and listed on the Structure Summary Sheet, and ditch, channel, and dyke earthwork which is listed on the profiles and included in the Earthwork Sheet. See Standards P-4 20, P-4.30, P-4.40, and P-4.50. SPECIAL DETAIL SHEET. This sheet(s) provides construction drawings of all miscellaneous, non-standard items not subject, wholly or in part, to Standard Drawings - Construction Details or Standard Drawings - Structures. See Standard P-5.10, for example. STRUCTURE SUMMARY SHEETS. These sheets summarize information on Structures Section items as follows: (Sheets available from ADOT.) (1) Separate summaries of reinforced concrete box culverts and spans over 20' , showing Station, Description, Special Details Sheet Number, applicable Structures Section Standards, and material, excavation, and backfill quantities. (2) A summary of Bridge and Miscellaneous Structures showing Stationing, Description, Special Details Sheet Number and applicable Structures .�. Dection Standards. Quantities for this category are shown on the appropriate Special Detail Sheet. (3) General Notes and Joint Notes. Standards P-6.10, P-6.20, and P-6.30 illustrate sample Structure Summary Sheets. PLAN AND/OR PROFILE SHEET. This sheet(s) is prepared on tracing material having a ruled grid bottom half for the profile portion or two separate sheets, one plain for the plan and one ruled for the profile view. The scale to be used is such that existing detail and proposed work can be • presented accurately and legibly. Wehn ink is not used, the rapidograph pen size is a general guide for the appropriate pencil width needed for all lettering or line work. Dimensional and lettering standards for titles, identification data, etc. are shown on the sample plan and/or profile sheets, Standards P-7 10, P-7.20, P-7.30, P-7.40, P-7.50 and P-7.60. Lettering on drawings should be single stroke gothic style, 28. r. or as shown in ADOT'S "Drafting Standards For Use In Office And Field", 1979. Line widths and symbols are illustrated by Standard Drawings P-0.20 and P-0.30. Nonstandard symbols and abbreviations must be promin- ently displayed and explained in a legend. Both superelevation and superelevation transition are assumed to be standard; if they are other than standard, their values shall be indicated by means of a diagram and by notation on the plan. (1) THE PLAN PORTION. This part of the Plan or Plan and Profile Sheet • is generally drawn to a 1"=100' scale for rural roadways. Plans for interchange, urban, and other areas of considerable detail are drawn to scales of 1"=50' or 1"=20' as required for ease of reading and interpretation. For the 1"=100' scale, all main roadway sheets except, possibly, the first and last sheets, carry thirty stations with the beginning and ending stations being divisible by thirty. Similarly, 1"-50' carries fifteen stations and 1"-20' , six stations. (2) THE PROFILE PORTION. This part of the Profile or Plan and Profile Sheet is drawn to the same horizontal scale as the plan portion. Generally, the ratio of horizontal scale to vertical scale is 10:1. EARTHWORK SHEET. This sheet(s) is fully-ruled and shows graphically the excavation, embankment, hauls, overhauls, borrow, borrow pit locations, balance points, and shrinkage factors concerned with the total earthwork for the project; it also shows the stationing and quantities, included in the overall earthwork project, of excavation and embankment for ditches, dykes, and channels. See illustration, Standard P-8.10. TRAFFIC SHEET. This sheet(s) provides all detail concerned with signing, lighting, traffic control, and delineation. ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT SHEET. This sheet(s) provides all detail concerned with landscaping, landscaping irrigation, rest areas, and other roadside beautification and driver-convenience facilities. p STRUCTURES SECTION SHEET. This sheet(s) provides all non-standard detail for the structures summarized by the Structure Summary Sheet. MATERIALS SERVICES SHEETS. These sheets are prepared by Materials Services and comprise: (1) Sketch maps of borrow and aggregate sources. (2) Test results for borrow and aggregate sources. (3) Subgrade information and soil profile. These data are provided only as information for the prospective bidder and are not a part of the contract papers. 29. Ail I\ eS COMPUTED FROM MANNING'S FORMULA n=0012 ee ( it ) , , i !, ,1 it'IM N ,: I ' 1 5000 "rlif ! � •� If'!: ,I r ; tllt'jil',f;l(;l,.I!lt:,f ! �•;1 It` , I r 'i! �tir �l ,�� , I ,1 -rti 1,�.. ,, .;ii i, ' 1-i-�� 1-f14414 � 11JI�, i'�}1 �" ` •�1t . i ] 1.., ,.. i" 1.++ , 3000 !!111 i 1 t : l4,i1,: i1;i.!'•, !.1, . ,,, ! , i •11;'~`T i:,, Jr,„ . i i'I II` 1 'I I li ,•1i ;I,;„ 1•.1 ' 1',r� l sr, l , '1t ;1, „ 2000 II I .:0 !_I , 1 14111; I,1, il; ::2.?, r ' f,,`� ` '+ ; II Tr 't1=.1 �( 1�t.i' r�;,s , t�� ,61'.41 � �,11L�.•'' , �-` � • _ Hu . , 0. .� . • .. t 1 �t r�j1 c, 1, L,--,. ,. , , d ..�dAm0 1000 800 !1 1.:,' i t ;- i,I ' X.i 1 \• \i• � lam{; '4 •-\• ' 1I w1�r / ` � 600 ;J'! 1 1\•�',` i h'. {, 1i ,1 l' , -� �1. ki..it t, . 400 i ! •' � ' ' . 0111, - \ . i. . . 3oo z I a� \ �"• i t' t \•� iti d ',"� , 4. ,t :\ 't rilisp 200 0 #, 1 , I ` ; ,,I , 1 .� W • 'ii �' �r_, ' 1�I.�� / l-lam" •ri. 0. Ir. ' y� ' 1 1 1 ,1 i , i i i1�A l �' 1\ i \ t I . Il�.��I✓L� � --all a.A. 100 W ' 1 l ' i♦i��i�l� nirt71� W irs. .�i +\ , ,.►I�►1 ..dgew 80 LL 1 j""lf 1 , . „i ,/ • i l i• `, m I F i I i-\ ! ___ :.z-' fit i \ \• \l . ! 1 -., .1\,-.1 60 1- 1`• ../ '\ \• t ' , 1V-i. ''�, /\I �,.-\1` ••l1ti ' N 3 z i bo ,, 40 w CC i1 • - '� 30 G ` ��.7 ' m. ,milik N .1101PIPIPP". , gelipp,ap.p7,. , I, . :,>I.aggpftik 1p"dilia, II ...0 0 114; 01 t . rTi 7r,-ii: NIPPIP, 1 I 101 \ 1 1014 1�A� /-iil�9i�11ralll�i iialgan`i0t°'� . i • i r:-; Lei : 1, Lill 1►Mr �� •1111=111 d 1 , 'iii� 4 r /• II '-�+-��l Ott��, ,+'111,. {y � .• t44:•: ,i�, OP' pLigski irt: ...7.-J a 1111111 Li-;1111111, it '. Mil tin 1 t_ •,i' ' .i„,: i' 1,! ;, -1- _ 4-4:14::: , 41 t t_1 ,+-1 1/11M1111:1_ ,..Pr: - If:,LI _,L;re`. 1 7 immmi- = : : mg= .wtf it" r i , I.,-i l 111 !y I i_ ;}. .1 I I -1-- 4,11 +ttt '1.'_4rr ;in .{i; ..1 ± t i I 74-"-, t-'1 1t •4.11 11i' i$l• i',i, 1 1 ; Ilt1 411ill: ililO ; I IIj!IIIJ %t I t:I r, '1 1 3 A .5 1 ,0 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 50 • SLOPE IN FEET PER THOUSAND 1�44 ��•-m n{rpm,•,`fie! �° ! Y C�F•�'.4J `Y V'�i V 6..r EXHIBIT "A" STORM SEWER DESIGN CHART (10 Year Frequency) Subdivision Name• Q = Total flow in the street and pipe. Designed By: Qst = Portion of Q that bypasses the storm sewer inlets at this location and flows in the street This must not exceed this Date: Qp = Protion of Q that enters the storm sewer. ) Location Drainage Area Time of Flow Min I Q Qst Street Sewer Design Hydraulic Grade Line Lire Lo ,From _ To No Increm Inlet I SeweriDesign in /hr cfs Capacity I Q Pipe Dia Vel Length Sf hi. Elevation 'From Point CA CA i p Slope In fps ft /ft ft Inlet Outlet II I i • _ - _ I _ 1 t y 1 1 . I I 1 1 1 l 1 . ____ ) CATCH BASIN CAPACITY CHART Q = incremental flow in the street Qb = flow bypassing the catch basin being analyzed or an upstream catch basin Qin = Q entering a catch basin d = Depth of ponded water over a catch basin in a sump or the depth of water at the gutter, if the catch basin is on grade Slope = longitudial slope for catch basin on grade Point No. = Points of location for catch basins, to be the same as used in the com- putation of the peak flow from subareas. Point Q Qb 1 d I Slope '' Qin Qb Street Type of I Number No Ca acit C.B. Used Used 1 { 1 I ! r ! • • _ i r � 1 EXHIBIT "C" * CATCH BASIN CAPACITY CHART A. Catch Basins in a sump condition: For catch basins in a sump condition, ie. , with water approaching from both sides of the catch basin, the following formula should be used: Q = 3 pd 1.5 Where - p = perimeter of the catch basin for MAG 534 (Single) , p = 4.44' ; for MAG 534 (Double) , p = 7.06' d = the ponded depth over the grate of the catch basin A few values for this formula are tabulated below. Type of d Catch Basin .3 .4 .5 .6 .67 MAG 534 (Single) 2.2 3.4 4.7 6.2 7.3 MAG 534 (Double) 3.5 5.4 7.5 9.8 11.6 B. Catch Basin on grade: The following values are to be used for catch basins on grade. The method used is found in the Arizona Department of Transportation manual from the hydrology seminar of December, 1968. Depth of Water Longitudinal Q Intercepted Q Intercepted in the Curb Slope of Street by MAG 534 (Sgl) by MAG 534 (Dbl) d = .5' .0010 3.3 5.5 .0020 3.9 6.5 .0030 4.5 7.6 .0040 4.9 8.1 .0050 5.2 8.6 d = .4' .0010 2.4 4.0 .0020 2.9 4.8 .0030 3.4 5.7 .0040 3.7 6.1 .0050 3.9 6.4 d = .33 .0010 .9 1.5 .0020 1.1 1.8 .0030 1.3 2.2 .0040 1.5 2.6 .0050 1.6 2.7 * These charts apply only to MAG 534 (Single) and MAG 534 (Double) . Other catch basins may be used; calculations are to be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. EXHIBIT "D" ... PEAK FLOW FROM SUB AREAS ( • Subdivision Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i 10 4.4 25 2.8 33 2.35 41 2.0 49 1 .77 57 1 .60 65 1 .4 12 4.1 26 2.75 34 2. 3 42 2.0 50 1 .75 58 1 .56 70 1 .35 14 3.8 27 2.7 35 2.25 43 1 .95 51 1 .72 59 1 .55 75 1 .25 16 3.6 28 2.65 36 2.2 44 1 .9 52 1 .7 60 1 .50 80 1 .20 , 18 3.4 29 2.6 37 2.2 45 1 .87 53 1 .69 61 1 . 50 85 1 . 15 , 20 3.2 30 2.55 38 2.15 46 1 .85 54 1 .68 62 1 . 50 90 1 .10 22 3.0 31 2.5 39 2.1 47 1 .83 55 1 .65 63 1 .45 100 1 .00 24 2.9 32 2.4 40 2.05 48 1 .8 56 1 .63 64 1 .45 120 .85 NOTES: "i" is the intensity for a 10-year storm. 15 minutes maximum may be used for runoff from lots. - Point Area C CA Length of Average Tc i Q No. Acres Area Velocity Min cfs .. Z ^, . S 1 , ' , .. Jr , I i r --, I EXHIBIT "E" eiN eliS • to , .t., 1 -.Rr•1.. �.: i r •• f s � lii( �� i� ,�. ti{iltiii i' i i t, :;i4if '`•i {1'il'{'.� 1 ` . { ,, i t I;� 1 { l Iliiiiiiiii,iiiltiiiVll,tlit , .. li ?Al I Ii1I I. i 1 i. T 11 i li:ili ,I,IIt1H ii{If it qS,P i I. (j t 'l i . L �,;i ht. .I !ii, '',r ' 1 ; 'n e iII!!tl11 'tlillll) IIIItItii•t:4iCI!I11 k° !1 .1 I 1i1111 il(11, lliilil .1! II • , , ; i :;,; ;' .Y!ilk �1 Iiii,ip h I !i tlt: 42 Dili. -4..._ ... --.-I.-... -- : Lull til b 1 .1' !! L f 110 i' `. 4 1 '. 1..1.1 'i1• �r�l/�• ®'lii 'ti� i114-4 't ;, __. f u I >. .--, ,,,,! ,iiillii!litii..r.i�� 0��r i ii .t y i 1,, 11,'. ;.{l I111 I.I pp i,. 6 " -_ l' ;I { 1' -1f.D II• It H _.. O• n L!.ft iij• '!• Y i •iti (�. ! III t • 'Ililn .. i'• .li. I t s. cc 7 1 1::; d:,,.i i! 001. •i i l`1 ' it '1 ii it 1 ;! o„ 11 iiili� !..1 . 1ii',:tr. I . :I do‘l ,i[I;t: !f? ,�f '! I' I ,t!; ` I1': .1i fi'Iilll'iili'lli'�i, .± rt 1tl. l Otl f[11i14: t ' .. • .. NI �0{i';II •' 1110 f' i . 1,.I ti i l : li j i l 1 1 II:It II, 1 1' 4. {�I�tl;, it I i!II r � f i i1i' . I I w .► I.t.j,illp, ilIi •,I.,.t'1::... L 4.: oi? og I 15 E c ',u' ,n' ' '; o. °� i i , t i .rue;r'' -Curt- !!--1 I: q .e -...1 gills H , ....4111111111 / Off' - i-.._--7 w :. ;1: : i 'wed ® 1 „i g 34; 1=-.,f . ,! : ..,?,cEi!!: �` — ,., I .2 r-1. 45 08 S3'8 —.-. � —. -, -ii C ..«,a. ii E{i::if t 1 :4 ••, +:i-:: •'1 1 _..., i I `I W.: y 2 LLII `:t'i r w; :..� ..�,�♦ .... u 1 1. .l' rti .:....z:i'I' t '-t„ i1"4-'�" �H,",'„ , I `•" �''`n. `!88- ��4::S 8 t I ��4= » .. I 1.3 2 •2.3 3 4 6 6 I $ I It)` 16 20 £5 20 40 !0 60 10 90 90 100 GUTTER FLOW = Q (C.F.S.) t. •1 4 • NOTE• Use this chart for velocity estimations only. Enter the chart at 3 cfs. Figure the street capacity from individual cross- section of each street using n=.015 for paved streets. EXHIBIT "F" 0 E t i ' t i 4 v ' { {E•cs t It t t• 1 ` ' I E. r { ; y• .0 { f / - _ I { ; t-I . - .PS 1 L.4.-1.-- L - _-_71.1_1111 - i r i --r-t--- t 3 -__ ' _ - , _ }-i . __ _ - , i t I c- i- --= _ m. r „ -. 4 -_ - • 1.5 ---.-I f —4- r I ! 1 t .4 - 7O 1-1 -7-t .--� w�t� a i1 .• 3 G=� _MINICIM611-.1411141KZL, t° P-4;�`=L.90 ` _ MIMI '� "" —___ = = _ t � = - ; ems _ , wry '" MOM • =-111 _If - - - - 5 min. 10 20 30 40 60 100 234 3)0 5J0 1000 1 nr. 2 3 4 > > 2, AIN Duration Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Relationship for Apache Junction, AZ . 4 t EXHIBIT "G" l i AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING WITHIN CITY RIGHTS-OF-CITY THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 19 by and between the City of Apache Junction hereinafter called r "City" AND owner of property located at hereinafter called the "OWNER" . City Right-of-Way is defined as that portion of a divided Roadway that separates the traveled roadway for traffic flowing in opposite directions and any other portion of the Right-of-Way lying outside of the traveled roadway, hereinafter called "RIGHT-OF-WAY" . In consideration of the mutual promises and convenants herein contained the parties agree as follows : (1) City will allow the owner to landscape the Right-of-Way (Give specific description and location) in the following manner : (Set out exact type of landscape) . (2) Owner will maintain the said landscaped Right-of-Way by (Set out type of work to be done) and perform all other necessary mainte- nance. (3) The City Engineer shall determine whether the Right-of-Way is being maintained in a proper and satisfactory manner . If it is determined by the City that the Right-of-Way is being unsatisfactorily maintained, the City shall notify the owner by regular mail at his last known address of this fact . Owner will have fifteen (15) days from date of mailing in which to make provisions for the satisfactory com- pliance with this agreement . EXHIBIT "H-1" I A'm' (4) If the owner fails to perform the provisions of this agreement or if the assignees , conveyees, transferees , trustees, grantees , lessees , legatees , or devisees of the owner fail to perform the provisions of this agreement, the City shall per- form the required work and assess the cost against the property . A lien shall be recorded against } the property for the amount of the assessment . (5) At the time the lien is recorded , the City shall have the option to continue to maintain the Right- of-Way in the manner described in this agreement or to remove the landscaping herein described and replace it with any other material the City decides is appropriate. (6) The lien will be removed and a release will be recorded when the owner or the succeeding assignees , conveyees , transferees , trustees, grantees, lessees , legatees , or devisees of the owner agree to perform the provisions of this agreement and post an appr- opriate bond . CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION By Director of Public Works ATTEST : City Clerk Owner Owner STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. County of ) On this the day of , 19 , before me, , the undersigned officer , personally appeared and satisfactorily proven to be the persons whose name are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same for the purpose therein contained . IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand and official seal . Notary Public My Commission Expires : EXHIBIT "H-2" ASSTSRti.0CE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVal._ _CS (IN LIEU OF CASH OR BOND) Assurance for construction of improvements within the designated right-of-way described as: For the purpose of providing the Assurance of Construction of Improvements within the corporate areas of the City of Apache Junction, herein referred to as Subdivider/Owner/Developer, and herein referred to as Financial Institution, licensed to do business in Arizona, represent as follows: 1. Financial Institution is committed to provide an irrevocable line of cre- dit or sufficient funds to the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, to cover the entire cost of installing improvements, consisting of, but not limited to: utilities, paving, curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, irrigation, including engineering and inspection costs, and the cost of replacement or repairs of any existing streets or improvements damaged by the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, in the course of construction. Said credit or funds are to be in the amount of: ($ ) , based upon a cost estimate submitted by the Subdivider/Owner/Developer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. All disbursements from said funds by Financial Institution to pay for said improvements shall be made to the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, or to a contractor or material supplier upon direction of the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, upon presentation of invoices and lien waivers. It is agreed that once construction had started, in the event the improvements in the above-described project are not completed, as evidenced either by a lack of work on the improvements for a period of sixty (60) days, or improvements as constructed are not acceptable to the City Engineer and not in compliance with City standards, and the developer refuses to make satisfactory corrections, then the City of Apache Junction may, upon certified letter to the said Financial Institution, draw upon the said line of credit, to the amount necessary to complete the improvements or make satisfactory corrections. This line of credit shall remain in force and effect until: (1) the improvements for said project have been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, as evidenced by letter, or (2) said line of credit has been exhausted by withdrawals by the said City. SUBDIVIDER/OWNER/DEVELOPER FINANCIAL INSTITUTION BY: BY. TITLE TITLE: Approved by: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE EXHIBIT "I" ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM #I MEETING OF MOTION BY: j;/14SECONDED BY:, YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON I/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON j VICE MAYOR HILL V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO vi MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ‘/ UNANII S IN FAVOR OPPOSED j ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY ENGINEER, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO DISSEMINATE THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT, AFTER WHICH, AT THE MAY 18, 1982, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDE MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR FORMAL ADOPTION BY FURTHER MINUTE ACTION , Ink IN Mk. PQACHE✓G r Z '41PIZO‘41X 6Zty orn &4pache av- unction DATE : APRIL 13 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO : THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU : CITY MANAGER /DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: CITY ENGINEER REGARDING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION AND FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. (AGENDA ITEM) Attached are copies of two guidelines which show requirements for control of construction within City of Apache Junction rights-of-way . The Special Provisions establish exactly the types of construction methods , materials , and testing/inspection required of all contractors working in the City , and act to "fill out" the rather vague treatment of these areas in the Maricopa Association of Governments Specifications and Details . Our intent is to gain better control of this type of construction , so as to minmize occurance of such things as sunken waterline trenches , pavement subsidence , concrete cracking, etc . These provisions have been reviewed and endorsed by the Development Coordinating Committee , and City Staff . It closely parallels similar Special Provisions which have been given force of ordi- nance by other cities and counties. We ask that the Mayor and the Council study these provisions at their pleasure and ask any questions deemed necessary of the City Engineer . It is our intention to open these Special Provi- sions to a thirty (30) day study period by the Council and other local interest groups . At the end of the period we will ask the Mayor and the Council to adopt the Special Provisions as City Ordinance. Approver for Agenda_. �( D to i Itorn # First Reading . L ��' ... . AMA/c c Second leading Public Hearing _ . Old Business 7-New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES I . SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. All work and materials shall conform to the current "Uniform Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction - Maricopa Association of Governments" , subject to City of Apache Junction supplement, as these Uniform Standard Specifications apply to trench back- fill material, backfill compaction and roadway surface restoration, except as noted in these Special Provisions. In case of conflict between the Uniform Standard Specifi- cations and these Special Provisions , these Special Pro- visions shall govern. Other agency specifications for construction material or methods which are equal to the Uniform Standard Specifications, may be substituted as satisfactory alternates , only with prior written approval of the City Engineer at no cost to the City of Apache Junction . II . PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS , ENGINEERING A. Preparation of plans, specifications , construction and inspection shall be performed under the super- vision of a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of Arizona and employed by the owner, except that plans prepared by utility companies for distribution of gas, electric power or for communication service need not be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer . B . Plans shall be submitted as outlined in the City of Apache Junction Development Guide, except as modi- fied by these Special Provisions . Profiles will be required on projects involving installation of sewer and underground irrigation lines in dedicated right- of-way. Power facilities must also be submitted in profile where the trade size of a single conduit exceeds six inches ( 6") in diameter or where multiple conduits including the concrete encasements are sixty (60) square inches or greater in cross-sectional area. In addition, profiles may be required by the City Engineer in cases of possible alignment or grade con- flicts, cover problems or crossing conflicts . Plans may be submitted concurrently with the application for construction permit. III. EXCAVATION , BACKFILL AND COMPACTION A. Excavation - All excavation shall conform to the requirements of Section 601 of the M. A. G. Standard Specifications , except as modified in these Special Provisions . Attention is called to necessary notifi- cation of all utilities . (Call Blue Stake - Te1. 263-1100) B . Backfill and Compaction 1. Materials : Backfill shall consist of sound earth material (other than open graded rock) free from concrete, timber, asphalt pavement , organic material or other debris . When "select" material or "aggregate base course (A. B. C. ) " is substituted or specified, it shall conform to the applicable specification of the M.A. G. Standard Specification. 2 . Compaction a. That portion of the backfilll from the bottom of the trench to twelve inches ( 12") compacted depth, over the top of the pipe or conduit shall be backfilled with ABC. This material shall be uniformly jetted to insure proper bedding of pipe. Backfill around underground electric and communication lines must meet the specification of the responsible utility owner . b. For a trench under any existing or proposed pavement , curb or gutter, or when the distance from the edge of pavement or back of curb to the centerline of the trench is one-half the depth of trench or less, the backfill shall consist of ABC or select material . The material from twelve inches (12") above the top of the pipe to two feet (2 ' ) below finished grade shall be mechanically compacted to not less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the maximum density of the material . The upper two feet (2 ' ) of the material shall be mechanically com- pacted to not less than ninety-five percent (95%) of the maximum density of the material, with the upper minimum ABC requirement for roadway pave- ment compacted to not less than 100% of the maximum density of the material . Sufficient water may be added to raise the moisture con- tent to optimum only . c . For a trench in an unpaved road where the dist- ance from the edge of the traveled way to the centerline of the trench is one-half the depth of the trench or less , the backfill shall con- sist of ABC or select material . The material from twelve inches (12") above the top of the 2 . pipe to two feet (2 ' ) below finished grade shall be mechanically compacted to not less than 85% of the maximum density of the material . The upper two feet (2 ' ) of the material shall be mechanically compacted to not less than 95% of the maximum density of the material . Sufficient water may be added to raise the moisture content to optimum only . d. For a trench where the centerline is more than one-half the depth of the trench from the edge of existing pavement, back of curb, or edge of the traveled way on an unpaved road, the material from twelve inches (12") above the top of the pipe to finished grade shall consist of sound earth material as previously speci- fied , compacted to not less than 85% of the maximum density of the material . Water settl- ing as defined herein is permissible . e. For trenches in alleys and other miscellaneous traveled ways, the backfill and compaction as per paragraph III . B. 2 . d . shall be followed . f. For trenches in utility easements the backfill may consist of sound earth material . Water settling as defined herein is permissible . g. Water settling as permitted herein shall be performed with lifts not exceedingfive feet ( 5' ) in depth . The backfill shall be leveled, the trench flooded and the material jetted to : (1) Within one foot (1 ' ) of the pipe if the lift is five feet (5' ) or less from the top of the pipe, or (2) at least one foot (1 ' ) into the pre- vious lift if multiple lifts are nec- essary . Sufficient water must be used with a pressure of at least 30 p . s .i . to insure filling of all voids with backfill material . Intervals of jetting shall be not more than six feet (6' ) along the trench and transversely across the trench. The water shall not be shut off until the jet has been completely withdrawn from the material . h. Water settling is permitted in new subdivisions but no paving will be permitted over water settled trenches until compaction test results have been approved by the City Engineer . 3. C . The minimum cover for utility lines shall be thirty- six inches (36") , other than direct burial cable which shall be twenty-four inches (24") . The minimum cover for storm drainage or irrigation pipe shall be eighteen inches (18") . Cover is defined as the difference in elevation between the top of the line or pipe and the ultimate gutter grade of the roadway . If paving is not completed within thirty (30) days after installation of the underground facilities , a temporary earth cover Ado irk, sufficient to meet the above requirements must be placed and maintained . For facilities outside the limits as defined in para- graph III.B . 2 . d . above, cover is defined as the difference in elevation between the top of the line or pipe and the natural or regraded ground surface whichever is lesser . D. TESTING. 1. Procedures . a. AASHTO T99 - Maximum density . b. AASHTO T147 - Field density . c. AASHTO T27 - Sieve analysis . 2. Frequency. The tests shall be made at the locations and depths specified by the City Engineer or his representative . A minimum of one set of tests will be required for each four feet (4 ' ) of trench depth for trenches within a paved road or within one half the trench depth measured from back of curb or edge of pavement to centerline of the trench. Otherwise , one set of tests will be required for each eight feet (8 ' ) of trench depth. The minimum number of passing tests per set anticipated for specification compliance may be estimated as follows : a. Pavement cut crossing - one (1) set of tests per crossing. b. Longitudinal pavement cuts or the centerline of the trench within one-half the trench depth as previously explained - one set of tests per three hundred feet (300 ' ) with one set of tests minimum . c . All other locations - one set of tests per four hundred feet (400 ' ) with one set of tests minimum. 3 . Tests may be taken at four foot (4 ' ) vertical incre- ments in the same vertical plane at the option of the inspection engineer. Copies of all test reports shall be identified as to project and location by the test- ing laboratory and forwarded to the inspection engineer 4. who shall forward one set of all test results to the City Engineer . 4. At his discretion, the City Engineer may order load tests performed to determine the suitability and adequacy of backfill before placement of pavement . Such tests shall be performed with vehicle loaded to approximately eighteen thousand pound (18 , 000#) axle load . Excessive movement or settlement of backfill shall be cause for rejection of the work by the City . Initial load tests shall be at the expense of the City. If the work is rejected , load retests shall be at the expense of the owner or contractor . IV. PAVEMENT CUTTING AND RESTORATION. ( See M.A. G. Std . Detail 200) A. All cuts in asphalt or concrete pavement shall have saw cut or neat and straight edges . All transverse or dia- gonal pavement shall extend at least one foot (1 ' ) beyond either side of the trench . Excavated pavement material shall be removed from the site. B . Pavement cut replacement: The asphaltic material used for replacement of pavement cuts shall conform to the applicable M. A. G. Standard Specification for mix C-3/4 , Section 710. The thickness of the pavement and aggregate base replaced shall be consistent with the thickness of the existing asphalt pavement and base but shall not be less than 2 inches (2") of asphaltic pavement over nine inches (9") compacted depth, of aggregate base compacted to 100% of maximum density for the material . For portland cement concrete paving cut replacement , this same specification will apply. The existing pavement shall be trimmed to a neat edge and the edge shall be treated with a proper emulsion to insure a bond between the existing pavement and the patch . It is required that all roadway crossing of lines 4" in diameter or less be bored or pushed under pavement which is less than five (5) years old. V. SURFACE RESTORATION OF GRAVELED OR EARTH SURFACE ROADS . The surface replacement for gravel surfaced roads shall be consistent with the existing surface material in place, and may consist of Select Material or A. B . C. as directed by the City Engineer . , Fill placed on existing gravel surfaced roads or earth surfaced roads to obtain minimum allowable cover over the pipe or utility lines shall be placed to proper grade for the 5 . full widths of the existing roadway and shall be compacted and graded to the satisfaction of the City Engineer . VI. MISCELLANEOUS. The Contractor shall secure a City Engineering Department Permit prior to start of any construction operations within City right-of-way . Three (3) sets of approved plans must be submitted with the application at least five (5) working __ days before work is scheduled to begin. The permittee shall notify the property owner or resident of adjoining occupied property at least two ( 2) working days prior to disruption of access to the property, and at no time deny access to the property longer than one (1) normal working day, and shall provide plank for crossings , if necessary. The permittee shall maintain all existing traffic control signs within the construction area , and shall reset all signs in their original locations as soon as construction operations will permit . The permittee shall place and maintain traffic warning devices during the course of work, as required by the City Engineer . Only rubber-tired equipment shall be used on pavement. Water or approved dust palliative in sufficient quantities shall be applied during all phases of construction involving open earth work to prevent the unnecessary discharge of dust and dirt into the air. During the course of work, the permittee shall maintain the work area in a clean and orderly condition . Excess excavation, debris, etc . , will not be permitted to accumulate on the road Auk surface or shoulders . Work shall progress in such a manner that no condition such as soft trenches , drop-offs from the edge of pavement , etc . , will exist . Upon completion of install- ation, the permittee shall clean the pavement surface, pull and dress shoulders , and otherwise put in order the entire work area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer . NOTE: Contractor shall notify the Police Department and Fire Department 24 hours prior to completely closing any street for construction. 6 . amk CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. COMPACTION: A. Subgrade - Top six inches (6") of pavement and curb subgrade shall be scarified, loosened and compacted to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of the maximum density of the material. Sidewalk subgrade shall be compacted to a minimum of eighty-five percent (85%) of the maximum AN►, density of the material. B. Base Material - The base course shall not be placed on subgrade until compaction tests of the subgrade have been provided to the city and found to meet the specifications contained herein. Base material shall be compacted, full depth, to a minimum of one hundred percent (100%) of the maximum density of the material being used. C. Asphalt concrete pavement shall be compacted to ninety-five percent (95%) of the specific gravity of test specimens compacted by the 75 blow method of ASTM D-1559. A rolling pattern may be established for this required density only with the approval of the City Engineer. D. Requests for variances from A and B above will require certified material tests and designs. 2. CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR CURBS, GUTTER & SIDEWALKS. Expansion joints shall conform to Section 729 of the MAG Standard Specifications and placed only at driveways and at ends of curb returns. Contraction joints shall conform to MAG Details 230 and be placed at twelve-foot (12') intervals on straight runs and within curb returns. 3. TESTING. A. All requirements of this section shall be performed under the supervision of a Civil Engineer registered in the State of Arizona. All test reports are to be submitted to the City Engineer. Each report shall indicate the location at which the test was made, the date of the test, type and source of material tested, test designation being used and the name of the person performing the test. B. The following soil tests are the minimum required for pavement design purposes: 1. Samples shall be taken to a minimum depth of eight (8) inches below proposed subgrade elevation. 2. One (1) test per eight hundred (800) lineal feet with at least one test per proposed street. An additional test may be ordered by the City Engineer at apparent visible changes in soil type. 3. Each sample shall have a sieve analysis per AASHO T27 with results reported as percent passing #200 sieve, plus a plasticity index per AASHO T91. 461 4. Test results shall be forwarded to the City Engineer together with the paving plans. 5. Additional tests may be required by the City Engineer for purposes of assurance of design information in cases of submittal of pavement de- signs other than the Standard. C. The following compaction tests shall be performed: 1. Pavement subgrade - One (1) test per eight hundred (800) lineal feet of roadway with at least one (1) test per street, minimum. 2. Curb subgrade - One (1) test per five hundred (500) lineal feet of curb with at least one (1) test per street, minimum. 3. Base material - One (1) test per eight hundred (800) lineal feet of roadway with at least one (1) test per street, minimum. 4. Asphalt pavement - One (1) test per eight hundred (800) lineal feet of roadway with at least one (1) test per street, minimum. Maximum densities for the materials being compacted shall be determined in the laboratory for the same materials in accordance with AASHO designa- tion T-99. Field density tests shall be performed in accordance with AASHO designation T-147. D. The following daily concrete test cylinders shall be taken: 1. Two (2) sets per pour over four (4) hours pouring time, two (2) six inch (6") cylinders per set. A seven (7) day break shall be made for each set. When the seven (7) day break is below 1800 PSI a twenty-eight (28) day break shall be made. At least one (1) twenty-eight (28) day cylinder shall be broken for each project with more than forty (40) cubic yard of poured concrete. E. The following tests shall be taken for asphaltic concrete: 1. Gradation - Expressed as % by weight passing, using AASHO T-30. 2. Asphalt content - Expressed as % by weight of total mixed material, sampled and tested per AASHTO T-164 and T-168. 3. Compaction - As previously specified in paragraph VII - C above. A minimum of one (1) sample per 1200 tons of material, but no less than one (1) sample from each source is required for each day's paving. Addi- tional samples may be ordered by the City Engineer or Inspection Engineer whenever obvious visual changes occur in the mix. 4. MATERIALS: A. Base Material - To meet Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Speci- fications, Section 702. If "Select" material is used, the upper four inch (4") of base must be Aggregate Base Course. The total thickness shall be Cmk ( determined by laboratory tests of the subgrade materials, with a minimum of six inches (6") . B. Asphaltic Concrete - To meet Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Specifications, Section 710. Minimum asphalt content shall be 5% unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Engineer. C. Seal Coat - A preservative seal, conforming to MAG Specifications, Section 718, shall be applied to the finished Asphaltic Concrete surface at the rate of 0.10 gallons of diluted mixture per square yard. The dilution shall be two (2) parts of the concentrate to one (1) part water. No sanding will. be required. D. Concrete - Concrete for all structures, curb, gutter, sidewalks, driveway entrances, wash crossings and street related concrete construction shall be Class B, conforming to the applicable requirements of Section 725 of the MAG Standard Specifications. E. Reinforced Concrete Pipe - Shall meet MAG Standard Specifications, Section 735. NOTE: Contractor shall notify the Police Department and Fire Department 24 hours prior to completely closing any street. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # j6() MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: a YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL � COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH `� COUNCILMAN HUDSON vf COUNCILMAN EIDSON JAYOR CLARKE /1/// ..COUNCILMAN WIANO �kW V6h4N /` _ UNANFIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY ENGINEER, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, TO DISSEMINATE THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT, AFTER WHICH, AT THE MAY 18, 1982, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR FORMAL ADOPTION AS CITY ORDINANCE, ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: 't-'. SECONDED BY: kk0 YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ✓ MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH _COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE_ MAYOR HILL UNANI""OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ` ABSTAINED \(// TOTAL ITEM NO , 15 CALL UPON THE CITY MANAGER FOR DISCUSSION , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THIS AGENDA ITEM BE CONTINUED AT A LATER DATE . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 41,15c3„. SECONDED BY : gZ-nt-(14. YES NO ABSTAINED MAYOR CI ARKE / COh1NC I LMN IANO 1-/ V STEELSMITH TEELSMITH / COUNCILMAN HUDSON ✓ , i _COUNCILMAN FIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL V UNANI2 US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED . ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 16 CALL UPON THE CITY MANAGER FOR DISCUSSION . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THIS AGENDA ITEM BE CONTINUED AT A LATER DATE. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 3671/1 Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITN ! N ' J MAYOR CLARKE \// COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V VICE MAYOR HILL V COUNCILMAN EIDSON UNANI"I US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 17 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION AND AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL COMPLEX OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON MAY 4, 1982, AT - 1@ P .M, (�030 es els es Dear Norm, I too , share your concern about the Bingo playing in the trailer parks. As good citizens we want Bingo conducted in the proper way with directions given by the State. To my knowledge , small game bingo , there is no park violating any of the regulations. All persons conducting the recreational game must be notorized and registered with the state. A quarterly report on all activity must be submitted. There is a set of rules and regulations which each small game bingo organization must buy. Perhaps the enclosed bulletin will be of interest to you. If I can assist you in any way, please feel free to call. elS Ilene Taylor 982-5010 • '�KVIMT ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY SALES AND USE TAX DIVISION 1700 WEST WASHINGTON • PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 SMALL GAME BINGO INFORMATION BULLETIN 1. "Small Game Bingo" means a Bingo game or games conducted or operated by a small Bingo licensee and which do not exceed in the aggregate THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS in gross receipts per week. 2. On or before the 15th day of March of each year, each licensee shall file with the Arizona Department of Revenue an annual Financial Report of Bingo Operations, Form SBG-3. This statement will cover the preceding calendar year showing the amount of gross receipts derived during such period from Bingo games, the expenses incurred or paid, a brief description of the classification of such expenses, the net proceeds received from each such game of Bingo, and the uses to which such net proceeds have been or are to be applied. Each licensee shall maintain and keep such books and records as may be necessary to substantiate the particulars of each such report. If a licensee fails to file reports within the time required, or if reports are not properly verified, or not fully, accurately and truthfully completed, any existing license may be suspended until such time as the default has been corrected. 3. When awarding cash bingo prizes in amounts of less than $25, a voucher similar to the attached may be used in lieu of writing individual checks when such prize amounts are paid to winners from cash receipts of the occasion. All prizes in the amount of $25 or above must be awarded by check written on the bank account of the licensee. 4. No cards are to be sold to nor any prizes awarded to any person or persons under 18 years of age. 5. No alcoholic beverage or free bingo cards are to be offered as an inducement to play bingo, or as a door prize, or as a bingo prize. 6. Each bingo license expires at the end of the calendar year. In order to legally conduct games during the next year, bingo licenses must be renewed as soon as possible before December 31 of the current year. 7. If you have questions concerning bingo, please call 271 3227. � s- C - 3ZZ� Mr. CAhh,6eviek.y� • ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY SALES AND USE TAX DIVISION 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 LAWFUL EXPENDITURES (SMALL GAME BINGO) No item of expense shall be incurred or paid in connection with holding, operating, or conducting any game of bingo pursuant to any license, except bona fide expenses of a reasonable amount. Expenses may be incurred only for the following purposes: 1. The purchase of goods, wares and merchandise furnished as prizes. This includes bingo equipment and supplies necessary for the operation of games of bingo. 2. The payment for services rendered which are reasonably necessary for repairs of equipment. 3. Reasonable compensation not exceeding the total amount of $15 for each occasion to bookkeepers or accountants for services in preparing financial reports. 4. For rent if the premises are rented, not to exceed the amount of $25 for each occasion (unless the Department of Revenue has previously approved a greater amount of rent.) 5. For janitorial services not to exceed a total amount of $15 for each occasion. 6. Fees paid for license to operate Bingo games for a calendar year. LAWFUL USES OF SMALL GAME BINGO PROCEEDS (PROFITS) The entire net proceeds o`f Small Game Bingo occasions shall be devoted to educational, charitable, patriotic or religious purposes which benefit an indefinite number of persons under the influence of education or religion, by relieving their bodies from disease, suffering, or constraint, by assisting them in establishing themselves in life, or by erecting or main- taining public buildings or works, or otherwise lessening the burden of goveiiuuent. 4 ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY SALES AND USE TAX DIVISION 1700 WEST WASHINGTON PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85007 USE TAX DUE ON PURCHASES FROM OUT-OF-STATE SUPPLIERS (SMALL GAME BINGO) The Use Tax Act imposes upon the buyer a tax on the purchase of tangible personal property from an out-of-state vendor. In cases where the buyer has paid sales tax to an out-of-state seller, the amount paid may be applied against his Arizona use tax liability. Please review all purchases of Bingo equipment and supplies and remit 4% use tax on all purchases on which you have not paid a sales or use tax. PQACHE✓ �. ttII ,Y ,�, z, G��//-� V w,;,, ,T �r 4 z DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY q,p/ZONP (0 t y o, C4ruche ,o2unctaon WE McDANfEL April 12, 1982 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Director of Public Safety Thru: City Manager Subjec Departmental Report - March 1982 Attached you will find our departmental report for March, 1982. Our accident figures are continuing to come down from a high experienced in January. As the seasonal population changes to that of a more transient variety (passing through the City on the way to the Lakes or other points) we may experience more increases in the next few months. Certainly, Speed has played a part in our Spring and Summer months activity. People are in a hurry to get to the Lakes and cool off. Burglaries have jumped along with Larceny Theft. With the layoffs being experienced in the State with the slump in the Copper industry and the economy as a whole, we may see increases in these two areas upon us as early as next month. Surely, these will come as the savings of those to be laid off dwindle down and funds are needed. Additional, motivation in this activity will be the idleness of those laid off. We did see a decrease in Motor Vehicle Theft, but this area also may well be effected by these layoffs across the State. Animal Control activity is as follows: Complaints: 77 Impound Fees: $141.00 License Fees: 325.00 1982 Dog Tags Total March $466.00 Deposited to General Fund Total From February 2357.00 $2823.00 Deposited to General Fund 1-1-82 thru 3-31-82 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220*TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 2 Impounded Adopted Reclaimed Dogs 65 22 11 Cats 8 6 0 Destroyed In Pound at End of Month Dogs 25 26 Cats 2 0 Dog Licenses Sold to Date 1982 Licenses: 504 Kennel Permits Sold to Date 4 Citations Issued Donations Dog Running at Large: 3 $25.00 Plus Dog & Cat Food Unlicensed Dog: 5 APACHE JUNCILON POLICE DEPARIMENI Departmental Activity JAN. FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. TOTAL ACCIDENTS * 961 32 13 12 57 * 961 Accident-No Injury S 0 0 0 0 962 Accident-Injury AL 0 0 0 0 963 Accident-Fatality 962 22 14 2 38 P Persons Injured P 40 18 7 65 or Killed S 1 3 0 4 S Speed Related AL 1 1 1 3 AL Alcohol Related 963 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 AL 0 0 0 0 ( TRAFFIC CITATIONS SPEED 55 71 86 212 ALCOHOL 25 19 18 62 OTHER 139 96 110 345 INDEX CRIMES MURDER 0 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 0 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 BURGLARY 11 8 13 32 AG. ASSAULT 1 1 1 3 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 1 4 2 7 LARCENY 35 28 34 97 ARSON 0 0 0 0 ( C. R. T. HITS FELONY 1 7 4 12 MISDEMEANOR 11 11 26 48 °' QACHE ,.,. I.., s •ti , ' O 1P/Z0 14 P ity o (94pache cOunctaon April 7, 1982 ,� TO: City Manager THRU: Director of Public Works FROM: Building Official -✓ RE: Building Department Activity, Month of March, 1982 Attached you will find an activity report for the Building Permit Activity for the month of March, 1982. LF:llo Attached: Activity Report 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Ilk Ask BUILDING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY March, 1982 TYPE NUMBER OF VALUE OF LIVING COMMERCIAL NUMBER OF PERMITS CONSTRUCTION UNITS UNITS INSPECTIONS Single Family . Dwelling 22 907,961 22 - 288 Duplex - - - - - Triplex - - - - - Four-Plex 7 648,886 28 - 57 Apartments - - - - - Mobile Homes 35 346,590 35 - 194 Other Shelter 1 7,257 1 - 4 Additions (Res ) 7 38,009 - - 18 Additions (Other) 2 3,700 - - 3 Residential Carports & Garages 2 3,003 - - 31 Retail Store - - - - - Office - - - - - Other Commercial Buildings 1 12,000 Gazebo 77 Awnings 25 30,804 - - 39 Pools 1 6,000 - - 3 Signs - - - - - Storage Sheds 3 10,132 - - 7 Other 6 2,000 - - 14 TOTAL 112 $2,016,342 86 1 735 4 Renewals Issued F Aftk QACHE li F 2 O 0 _ • E 2�r y Z y`'R `Oit o ache 2unctian qR/ZONP April 6, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THROUGH: \ JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: JOE GERO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING CHUCK NEWCOMER, ACTING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO` C THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUBJECT: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTIVITIES At the April 5, 1982, regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment, a request for a variance to yard and lot size requirements of the GR General Rural zoning district was denied (Case BA-3-82/Tettley) . Two public hearings are scheduled for the May 3, 1982, meeting of the Board of Adjustment: BA-5-82 (Southard) and BA-6-82 (Rogelstad) . Attached are the approved Minutes of the March 1, 1982, Board of Adjustment meeting. Please have them inserted into the "Minutes Book". ^ CRN:rl b 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD MARCH 1, 1982 7 00 P M /mik Present Absent Guests Mr. Berry Ms Oberg Margaret Slancik Mr Burfiend Gloria Tenes Mrs Luddy Norma J Corsi Mr. Morrison Eleanor Tucker Mr Vaughn, Vice Chairman Albert Tucker Mr Jessamine, Chairman Hugh Warren Ms Breece, Recording Secretary Mary Warren Mr. Newcomer, Acting Executive Secretary Lois Broman Ruby Tettley Synopsis Approval of Minutes dated February 1 and February 15, 1982 Public Hearings BA-3-82 (Tettley) BA-4-82 (Slancik) BA-4-81 (Corsi) - Renewal 1. Chairman called the meeting to order and asked the Recording Secretary to call the roll. 2 Ms. Breece called the roll, determining six members were present and one absent, as indicated above. 3 Chairman asked for a motion to approve the Minutes dated February 1, 1982 4 Luddy/Vaughn M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated February 1, 1982, be approved ,.o, as written " The motion passed unanimously (6-0) 5 Chairman asked for a motion to approve the Minutes dated February 15, 1982. 6. Luddy/Burfiend M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated February 15, 1982, be approved as written." The motion passed 6-0-1, with Mr. Vaughn voting "present" due to his early departure from that meeting. 7. Chairman opened the public hearing and stepped down from the first case due to a possible conflict of interest The gavel was passed to Vice Chairman Vaughn 8. Acting Chairman asked staff to brief the Board on case BA-3-82 (Tettley) 9. Mr. Newcomer presented the case to the Board 10. Acting Chairman invited the applicant to speak. Adak Ankh, Page 2 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of March 1, 1982 11 Ms Tettley explained her request. 12. Acting Chairman asked for comment from the public supporting the application There being none, comment in opposition to the application was requested. 13. Ms Mary Warren introduced herself and referred to a letter with signatures of surrounding property owners who object to this application She submitted e additional signatures at this time 14 Chairman instructed the Acting Executive Secretary to read the letter into the Minutes 15 Mr. Newcomer "We wish to oppose the granting of variance application number BA-3-82 for the reasons that the area zoned General Rural and that the lot being 51' x 67' does not meet criteria for city or Pinal County zoning. We consider the lot to be an illegal split and therefore, it does not qualify for variance In addition, we hope the city considers an open space lifestyle, especially in this area Granting this variance would certainly be precedent-setting and would en- courage future unwanted high density development." (Signatures including those submitted tonight), by Richard and Lois Broman, Mary and Hugh Warren, Dorene and James Hughes, Donald Maynard, Eleanor and Albert Tucker, Rosemary Hoffinein (578 North Cortez), Rosaline Debnam. 16. Acting Chairman requested staff to summarize. 17 Mr. Newcomer referred the Board to the Zoning Administrator's IL memorandum recommending denial of the application unless the applicant provides evidence that the lot split was in compliance with the Pinal County Ordinance at the time 18 Acting Chairman entertained Board discussion and, following discussion, called for a motion 19 Burfiend/Berry M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, the'` in case BA-3-82, the requested variance is Y iy granted for the subject property, the location of which is a matter of record This variance is subject to the following con- ditions 1) The plot plan submitted shall be followed 2) The property will become legally recorded as one parcel within 60 days 3) Only the sister may reside in the trailer 4) The variance must be renewed in nine months 5) It is not transferrable, it is personal with applicant 6) Agencies in this jurisdiction must be complied with The Board bases its decision on the following reasons: Page 3 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of March 1, 1982 The size of the lot makes strict compliance with the yard setback requirements of the GR zoning district impossible " The motion failed 2-2-1, with Mr. Berry voting "present", and Mr Vaughn and Mr Morrison opposing 20 Acting Chairman reopened Board discussion during which the public Amok was allowed further comment. 21 Eleanor Tucker introduced herself and asked the Board to respect the letter of opposition and deny the application. 22 Hugh Warren introduced himself and noted the lot was too small for one trailer, let alone two 23 Acting Chairman called for a motion. 24. Luddy/Morrison M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that public hearing of case BA-3-82 be continued until April 5, 1982, at 7.00 p m. , in these chambers " The motion passed unanimously (5-0). The gavel was returned to Mr Jessamine following a five- minute recess 25 Chairman asked staff to brief the Board on the next case BA-4-82 (Slancik) 26. Mr. Newcomer presented the case to the Board 27 Chairman invited the applicant to speak 28 Harvey Long introduced himself as the general contractor for the applicant and explained the reasons for the variance request 29 Chairman opened the case to Board discussion after which a motion was requested, there being no comment in favor of or opposition to the application 30. Burfiend/Morrison M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apace Junction, Arizona, hereby granting the requested variance to Section 20 03 (7) of the city zoning ordinance in case BA-4-82, for the subject property, the location of which is a matter of public record This variance shall be subject to the following conditions The plot plan submitted with the application shall be complied with The Board bases its decision on the following reasons• 1) Adjacent neighbor to the south has no objections. 2) No other suitable location for the addition 3) The Zoning Administrator recommends approval " The motion passed 5-1, with Mr Vaughn in opposi- tion. 31 Chairman asked staff to brief the Board on the next case BA-4-81 (Corsi), a renewal Page 4 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of March 1, 1982 32. Mr. Newcomer presented the case to the Board 33 Chairman invited the applicant to speak. 34. Ms Corsi introduced herself and stated the situation had not changed since the original granting of the variance 35. Chairman called for a motion �\ 36 Burfiend/Morrison M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustme,,, of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, hereby granting a 9-month renewal of the temporary permit issued to the applicant in case BA-4-81. This temporary and revocable permit shall be subject to the same conditions as the original permit " The motion passed 5-1, with Mr. Vaughn in opposition 37. Chairman following distribution and general discussion of miscellaneous business (including an offer by staff to arrange a field trip to other cities' Board of Adjustment meetings, distribution of a schedule of city Board of Adjustment and Planning and Zoning Commission deadline cutoff dates and meeting dates, extending an invitation to the Board to attend a general plan study tour March 13, and rescheduling the regular July meeting of the Board to the 12th), the meeting was adjourned at 8 35 p.m. I Respectfully submitted, arles Newcbmer Acting Executive Secretary Approved ne, Chairman CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF April 6, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) Action completed. Aft. THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 16, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) Action completed. THAT THE APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE TO LA CASA DE TORO, BE TABLED TO A FUTURE DATE. (motion carried. ) C.C. Letters sent 4/7/82 THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL EVENT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL. (motion carried. ) C.C. Letters sent 4/7/82 THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY THE IRONWOOD MOBILE COURT, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY. (motion carried. ) C.C. Letters sent 4/7/82 THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A SMALL GAME BINGO LICENSE, SUBMITTED BY THE SAGUARO MOBILE RESORT, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY. (motion carried. ) C.C. Letters sent 4/7/82 THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER, BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH ROAD PROJECTS IN A N1IX OF IN-HOUSE RECONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTED CHIP-SEAL AND IN-HOUSE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PAVEMENT. THE TOTAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO BE SPENT WILL BE NOT MORE THAN $255,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO TRANSFER NECESSARY FUNDS FROM THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS TO THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS TO COVER THE COST OF SAID PAVING IMPROVEMENTS. C.M. In Process (motion carried. ) P.W. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTACT ALL PHYSICIANS PRACTICING WITHIN THE CORPORATE CITY LIMITS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE APPOINTMENT OF A CITY PHYSICIAN. C.C. List of physicians given to (motion carried. ) C.M. Manager - 4/8/82 CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF April 6, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE STEPS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE THE CITY COUNCIL WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CITY BOARD OF HEALTH AND CITY HEALTH OFFICER FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AND APPOINTMENT C.C. (motion carried. ) C.M. THAT THOSE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR SUNNY LANE ESTATES PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PZ-2-81)/SUBDIVISION (SD-1-82) ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BEING FOUND BY THE CITY ENGINEER TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ARE ACCEPTED INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM SUBJECT TO THE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AS Letter sent to developer REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. 4/8/82 (motion carried. ) Planning THAT FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE SUNNY LANE ESTATES SUBDIVISION BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE DECLARATIONS AND COVENANTS BEING SUBMITTED IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. Waiting for CCR's (motion carried. ) Planning THAT THE PRESENTED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, BE AND HEREBY IS, ADOPTED C.C. Copy sent to BLM 4/8/82 AND APPROVED. (motion carried. ) C.M. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH INVESTIGATING THE POSSIBILITY OF CITY C.C. Letter of contact sent '"R/8 MEMBERSHIP IN A CREDIT UNION. (motion carried. ) C.M. THAT PHIL RICHARDSON, JANICE PALSON, AND RONALD STAPLES, BE REAPPOINTED TO THE PARKS AND REC- REATION COMMISSION, SAID TERMS TO EXPIRE APRIL 30, C.C. Notified 4/7/82 1985. (motion carried.) C.S. THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT THE CITY HALL COMPLEX ON APRIL 15, 1982, AT 7:00 P.M. FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING THE PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 1982-83 BUDGET. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 4/8/82 THAT A WORK SESSION AND AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL COMPLEX OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON APRIL 20, 1982, AT 6:00 P.M. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 4/8/82 THAT A WORK SESSION BE MILD ON APRIL 27, 1982, AT 7:00 P.M. AT THE CITY HALL COMPLEX FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING CHARTER GOVERNMENT. (motion carried, )C.C. Posted 4/8/82 CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF April 6, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE DECISION TO BUILD A MUNICIPAL AIRPORT BE DECIDED BY PLACING IT AS A PROPOSITION ON THE BALLOT IN THE NEXT GENERAL CITY ELECTION IN ..._ APACHE JUNCTION. FURTHERMORE, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE TO STUDY THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF AN AIRPORT. AND FURTHER- MORE, THAT THE COUNCIL, THE CITY MANAGER, AND HIS STAFF BE DIRECTED TO PARTICIPATE AND COOPERATE WITH ALL AGENCIES, LOCAL, COUNTY, AND STATE, IN AIR TRAFFICE STUDIES, KEEPING IN MIND THE PRACTICAL SAFETY FACTORS AND GOOD NEIGHBOR POLICIES WITH OTHER CITIES AND WILLIAMS AIR P.W. FORCE BASE. (motion carried. ) C.M. In Process THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:03 P.M. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. ... CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING March 16, 1982 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION March 2, 1982 THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO CHECK INTC THE POSSIBILITY OF USING 10% OF EXCESS BUILDING FEES City Attorney TO GO TO THE SWIMMING POOL FUND. (Mayor Clarke) C.M. checking legal . THAT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FURTHER STUDY NOISE PROBLEM CREATED BY DOG POUND AND PRESENT ALTERNATIVES AND COSTS AT NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. (Councilman Damiaro, In holding AND Councilman Steelsmith) P.S. pattern. THAT BRICKS FOR THE VETERAN 'S GAZEBO BE DONATED IN THE NAME OF JERRY CASTRO IN APPRECIATION FOR ALL THE SUPPORT HE HAD GIVEN THE CITY. (Vice Mayor Hill ) REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR STREET REPAIR AND INVESTIGATE MORE PERMANENT METHODS OF REPAIR. (Vice Mayor Hill Work Session and Councilman Hudson) P.W. held 3/23/82 THAT CHARTER GOVERNMENT COMMITT MATERIALS NOT LEAVE Work Session CITY HALL. (Mayor Clarke) C.C. on 4/27/82 March 16, 1982 THAT APPROPRIATE STAFF STUDY PRESENT SIGN REGULATIONS AND DRAFT A SIGN ORDINANCE. (Councilman Steelsmith) THAT CITY TAKE ACTION TO GET COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN THE EXTION OF THE SUPERSTITION FREEWAY. (Councilman Hudson) THAT THE CITY MANAGER AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS SET UP APPOINTMENTS WITH DIRECTOR OF ARIZONA Response revei% DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND GOVERNOR BABBITT TO - 40 mph DISCUSS THE LOWERING OF THE SPEED LIMITS ON HIGHWAY C.M. on 4/20/82 60. (Councilman Eidson) p.w. agenda. .�. THAT APACHE JUNCTION RESIDENTS INFORM THEIR LOCAL STATE REPRESENTATIVES OF THEIR FEELINGS REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF THE SUPERSTITION FREEWAY. (Councilman Eidson) IF CITY IS AWARDED A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK Request being GRANT, CONSIDER USING THE FUNDS TO SLURRY SEAL C.M. investigated to CERTAIN ROADS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. (Mayor Clarke) Planning be discussed at 4/20/82 council meeting with CAAG. i /1� CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS ACTION NOT COMPLETED MEETING ACTION DATE REQUEST AGENCY STATUS November 18, 1981 THAT 90 DAYS PRIOR TO AWARDING THE INSURANCE COMPANY Letters to NEXT YEAR AN ADVERTISEMENT BE RUN IN THE PAPER consultant group! SOLICITING BIDS FROM ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES THAT mailed 2/25/82. MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN PROVIDING LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION. C.M. January 5, 1982 THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO FURTHER STUDY THE QUESTION OF Joint P&Z/Airpor ANNEXATION OF THE PROPOSED AIRPORT PROPERTY AND Commission, REPORT TO THE COUNCIL THEIR FINDINGS WITHIN THE NEXT proceeding with SIX MONTHS. (Motion carried. ) study. 9 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: ) 61A" YES NO ABSTAINED 1 COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNAN "OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 19 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT gay L4f` P .M. 41.4, vow ROLL CALL ROLL CALL IPRESENT ABSENT MAYOR CLARKE i1417 VICE—MAYOR HILL i ✓ COUNCILMAN EIDSON ✓ ✓ COUNCILMAN HUDSON ✓ �/ COUNCILMAN SHANKS ' I �✓ COUNCILMAN S I LELSr1ITH t/ V COUNCILMAN DA(1IANO ! ✓ _ i I TOTAL l L-P Le 1 STAFF PRESENT W1).. - CITY MANAGER _JAMES TUVELL CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly ✓ DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Joe Gero DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel °/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman CITY ATTORNEY t4r: r,cr/Mr. Hirsch ✓ OTHER .