Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 06.15 City Council Regular Agenda .., .... r:zw.: .. 4,(.1 sp,CHF 0 U t I , : z " A"IRIZOI•I cOit o v ac�ie &unction P CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA JUNE 15, 1982 7 : 00 P.M. 6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION 6: 00 P.M. WORK SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 1 , 1982 AWARDS , PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-34 , DECLARING CHAPTERS 3 & 4 OF VOLUME II OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AS PUBLIC RECORD (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 151 , ADOPTING CHAPTERS 3 & 4 OF VOLUME II OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (First Reading) (5a) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-35 , DECLARING DEVELOPMENT GUIDE AS PUBLIC RECORD (5b) ADOPTION OF DEVELOPMENT GUIDE (6a) PROPOSED USE HEARING ON FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING (6b) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-33 , TENTATIVE BUDGET ADOPTION (7a) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-07 , DECLARING PERSONNEL POLICIES AS PUBLIC RECORD 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Am ,41 (7b) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 139 , ADOPTING PERSONNEL POLICIES (First Reading with Emergency Clause) (8a) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-26 , WHITE/MCMILLAN (8b) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-32 , WHITE/MCMILLAN (9) LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION, SAFEWAY STORES, INC . , #253 (10) LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION, LA CASA DE TORO OLD BUSINESS (11) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 144 , LANG AND SULLIVAN (Second Reading) (12) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 130 , BUNNELL (Second Reading) (13) FEE FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY ROOM NEW BUSINESS (14) APPROVAL OF ATTORNEY CONTRACT (15) APPROVAL OF FIRE WORKS (16) AWARD OF BID FOR COMPUTER ADDITIVE EQUIPMENT (17) AWARD OF BID FOR INSTALLATION OF FUEL TANKS (18) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-15, INVESTMENT OF FUNDS (19) DESIGNATION OF SPEED LIMIT FOR 16TH AVENUE (20) APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (21) APPOINTMENTS TO AIRPORT COMMISSION (22) APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD (23) ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATIONS FROM PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION (24a) ACCEPTANCE OF RESIGNATION FROM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (24b) APPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (25) APPROVAL OF1ROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE (26) EXECUTIVE SESSION AND WORK SESSION, JULY 6 , 1982 (27) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (28) ADJOURNMENT THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES . 0)) // • ITEM # r MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: / G YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS i/ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL '✓ COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON '✓ MAYOR CLARKE v UNANI"" US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ! ABSTAINED TOTAL rAlik ITEM NO . 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 1, 1982 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on June 1, 1982, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m INVOCATION Councilman Eidson led the Invocation PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Hudson, Councilman Eidson, Councilman Damiano, Vice Mayor Hill, ( Mayor Clarke Staff Present City Manager J James Tuvell City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Works Rich Broman Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Planning Joe Gero Superintendent of Community ANN., Services Jeff Bel l Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson City Attorney Arnold Hirsch Others Present Mr. Mark Sullivan 438 N Saguaro Drive Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. James Bunnell 2600 W. Apache Trail Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 35 interested citizens and parties ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA ) Vice Mayor Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Aslik Aim. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 18, 1982) ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 18, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous ,.,` The motion carried AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell presented Certificates of Appreciation to 5 winners of the Swimming Pool Logo Contest, which were runners up, Donna Rabidue, Curtis VanDyck, and Co-winners Quint Elton and Stephanie Cooper. Mr. Bell also expressed his appreciation to the judges of the contest, Anne Lorenzo, Chamber of Commerce, Hedy Hall and Mike Carlin, members of the Parks and Recreation Commission CALL TO THE PUBLIC None. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None. [ PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 144, LANG AND SULLIVAN ) Director of Planning Joe Gero briefed the 1 Council on the application, stating that this is a request for rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-4 Multiple Residence zone Mr. Mark Sullivan, 438 North Saguaro, Apache Junction, requested approval of this application. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public Mr Gero stated that the Planning and Zoning - Commission recommended approval of the application with certain stipulations. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 144, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows• ORDINANCE NO. 144, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1982 PAGE TWO v. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 82-18, BUNNELL (Abandonment) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Director of Planning Joe Gero briefed the Council on this petition to abandon the thirty-three foot patent easement north of Winchester Mr. James Bunnell had additional comments. Amok. Mr. Gero informed the Council that Mr. John Granillo possesses a power of attorney for this application. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. Mr. Gero stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of this application with the stipulations discussed Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 130, by title only for the first reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 130, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-26-81 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2/PD GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 143, COMMISSION INITIATIVE (with Emergency Clause) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Director of Planning Joe Gero briefed the Council on the amendment of Section 2806 of the Zoning Ordinance. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. Mr. Gero stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended to approve this ordinance with the emergency clause There being no one wishing to address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public • Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 143, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 143, by title only for the first reading with the emergency clause City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1982 PAGE THREE ORDINANCE NO 143, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING SECTION 2806 COMMISSION ACTION AND SECTION 2807 CITY COUNCIL'S ACTION, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AND EMERGENCY. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 143, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Amok OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING SECTION 2806 COMMISSION ACTION AND SECTION 2807 CITY COUNCIL'S ACTION, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE PERSON TRANSFER, LA CASA DE TORO) )Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public Mr Thomas Mullen representing William and Sheila Fassett, stated that they had received a letter informing them that the hearing had been tabled several meetings past, and had no idea why it _. _:._ - was done. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the meeting to the public Mayor Clarke announced that this item will remain tabled, as no motion was made to remove it from the table. OLD BUSINESS None. Assmis NEW BUSINESS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 82-27, DESIGNATING CDBG TARGET AREA ) Director of Planning Joe Gero informed the Council that staff has discussed this with Central Arizona Association of Governments and have discovered that the City may be eligible for one more point in the ten point series This proposed resolution is required should the City choose to apply for this Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FINDING THAT 1970 U S CENSUS BUREAU DESIGNATED ENUMERATION DISTRICTS ED-1, ED-2, ED-3, AND ED-4 ARE DECLARED TO BE THE TARGET AREA FOR THE 1982-83 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1982 PAGE FOUR VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR SOUTHERN AVENUE CONSTRUCTION ) Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that Southern Avenue is the dividing line between the City and the County. Mr. Broman stated that the proposal is for the County to provide all manpower and equipment and the City to supply all construction materials. Councilman Hudson asked if this agreement includes our participation in repairing the County side. Mr. Broman replied that this is not in the agreement. City Manager James Tuvell commented that the City would not be using funds set aside for repairing our streets, as the City would spend less because of this agreement Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PROPOSED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND PINAL COUNTY FOR THE SHARED COST OF PAVING SOUTHERN AVENUE IN THREE (3) LOCATIONS IS DETERMINED TO BE A FAIR, EQUITABLE, AND ECONOMICALLY SOUND AGREEMENT. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 21, 1982, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Councilman Hudson seconded the motion. VOTE. In Favor Councilman Hudson, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Hill Abstained• Mayor Clarke The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-28, STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, INSTALLATION Director of Public Works Rich Broman briefed the Council stating that petitions had been received to create the Street Light Improvement District in a portion of Apache Villa III, Apache Villa IV and Clearview, and no objections have been filed. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing address the Council , Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-28, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER TO ORDER THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SUBDIVISIONS KNOWN AS APACHE VILLA THREE, APACHE VILLA FOUR, AND CLEARVIEW, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1982 PAGE FIVE Auk AsIlk PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 82-23, COUNTY ASSESSMENTS Director of Public Works Broman, explained the difference between this resolution and Resolution No. 82-28 is that this is a request for assessment by Pinal County Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO 82-23, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO TAXATION, LEVYING UPON,., THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, SUBJECT TO TAXATION, AND WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT DISTRIL,, SL-8011-1, A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR THE ANNUAL EXPENSE OF THE SAID MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 82-30, PINAL COUNTY ASSESSMENTS Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-30, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO TAXATION, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SUBJECT TO TAXATION, AND WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SL-8203-1, A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR THE ANNUAL EXPENSE OF THE SAID MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. City Manager Tuvell stated that the taxation will only include those homeowners receiving the benefit of the street light district. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-31, SPEED LIMIT ON PHELPS DRIVE ) Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel briefed the Council , requesting that this resolution to establish a speed limit be approved. Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-31, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON PHELPS DRIVE, BETWEEN BROADWAY AVENUE AND HIGHWAY 60, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1982 PAGE SIX Oak ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES FOR USE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING ) Superintendent of Community Services Jeff Bell explained to the Council that a $10.00 fee would be charged only for social type gatherings, and the fee would be waived for business meetings and such. Councilman Steelsmith suggested that this item be tabled at this time as it should be specific whom shall pay the the charge Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The motion carried. WORKS SESSION, EXECUTIVE SESSION, JUNE 15, 1982 Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION AND AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY COMPLEX ON JUNE 15, 1982, AT 6 00 P M. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Councilman Steelsmith informed the Council that there will be a regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at 7.30 p.m., on June 8, 1982 Councilman Hudson congratulated Councilman Damiano and anyone else involved in the well-prepared Memorial Gazebo Dedication. Councilman Eidson reported that a lot has been done on the streets, and the City will continue to repair the City streets. Councilman Damiano thanked everyone that attended the Veteran's Memorial Park Gazebo Dedication, and reported that it was very successful. REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Mayor Clarke addressed the Council and Public with the following. "Long before I became a member of this Council, I have been concerned over the Zoning Ordinance as adopted by the City. This ordinance is almost twenty years old, with very few amendments It is out-dated and does not meet the requirements of todays developers Land owners and developers are struggling with our ordinance, some of them waiting over a year for zoning or sub-division approval. Others will not even attept to undertake a project here because of the time involved and lack of modern zoning districts. Pinal County presently is up-grading their zoning ordinance to meet the demand of the land owners. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1982 PAGE SEVEN O Aollk It is our responsibility to have a zoning ordinance that not only gives proper protection to the present owners but also encourages development and growth Development of land such as sub-divisions will create more employment and more business. The Planning and Zoning Commission has an almost impossible task of doing the best for zoning applicants under the present conditions. I have been and still am an advocate of slow orderly growth. But there are some projects that must be completed early in the beginning of a city." Mayor Clark MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO REVISE, UP-GRADE, AMEND, AND STREAMLINE THE THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE REZONING PROCEDURES IMMEDIATELY AFTER ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN FURTHERMORE, THAT THE COUNCIL BE REQUESTED TO ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCESS. AND FURTHERMORE, THAT THE FIRST PROGRESS REPORT FROM THE PLANNING DIRECTOR BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY MANAGER NO LESS THAN 60 DAYS FROM ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous -- The motion carried. ADJOURNMENT ) Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8.03 P.M. Vice Mayor seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. Wendell J Clarke • Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1982 PAGE EIGHT ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Uo °/- • ITEM II MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: /177Y11 YES NO ABSTAINED COM ! I: ANO COUNCILMAN EID ON COHNCI ' . 1 ON _MAYOR CI ARK 11101.11.111111111 . YIlF MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN rMMiffiliall111111 IT, i .!^ UNANPOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO, 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 1, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED, PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR RESOLUTION NO , 82-34, DECLARING CHAPTERS 3 & 4 OF VOLUME II OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AS PUBLIC RECORD 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , Ask. Alume4 rpCHFF ✓G f_ U i z 'IR/ L. (pity a� `ipache unction 2 June 8, 1982 .-. MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: Ak' JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: k JOE GERO for DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE ,. RICHARD BROMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS LART ALLEN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - RESOLUTION NO. 82-34 DECLARING "SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS" AND "SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES" AS PUBLIC DOCUMENTS Attached is Resolution No. 82-34 which would declare Chapter 3, Special Provisions for Construction of Street Improvements and Chapter 4, Special Provisions for Installation of Underground Utilities as public documents. The City Council is requested to adopt this resolution. Requested Motion /... "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,that Resolution No. 82-34 a resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Jucntion, Arizona, declaring as a public record those certain documents filed with the City Clerk and entitled Chapter 3, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Street Improvements and Chapter 4, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Installation of Underground Utilities, which will be added to the Code of Apache Junction, Volume II, Land Development Code." Ki Approver for Agenda . . L _ -,-- Dote Item # JWG:rlb / — ,3 Rrr.-R. ding (/D lI 14 .. .. Scccr 1>-,�r1:r,iq . .Ii"---P:,:.;.. ilunr,ng Old Business N�w 6winess 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 45 RESOLUTION NO 82-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CHAPTER 3, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR STREET IM- 001111\ PROVEMENTS, AND CHAPTER 4, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, WHICH WILL BE ADDED TO THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, VOLUME II, LAND DEVELOP- MENT CODE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that 1 Those certain documents entitled Chapter 3, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Street Improvements and Chapter 4, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Installation of Underground Utilities, three (3) copies each of which are on file incthe office of the City Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, are hereby declared to be public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk 2. a) That certain document entitled Chapter 3, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Street Improvements, contains three (3) pages, numbered 1 through 3. b) That certain document entitled Chapter 4, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Installation of Under- ground Utilities, contains six (6) pages, numbered 1 through 6 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. City Attorney CHAPTER 3 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. COMPACTION: A. Subgrade - Top six inches (6") of pavement and curb subgrade shall be scarified, loosened and compacted to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) of the maximum density of the material. Sidewalk subgrade shall be compacted to a minimum of eighty-five percent (85%) of the maximum ,,,*, density of the material. B. Base Material - The base course shall not be placed on subgrade until compaction tests of the subgrade have been provided to the city and found to meet the specifications contained herein. Base material shall be compacted, full depth, to a minimum of one hundred percent (100%) of the maximum density of the material being used. C. Asphalt concrete pavement shall be compacted to ninety-five percent (95%) of the specific gravity of test specimens compacted by the 75 blow method of ASTM D-1559. A rolling pattern may be established for this required density only with the approval of the City Engineer. D. Requests for variances from A and B above will require certified material tests and designs. 2. CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR CURBS, GUTTER & SIDEWALKS. Expansion joints shall conform to Section 729 of the MAG Standard Specifications and placed only at driveways and at ends of curb returns. Contraction joints shall conform to MAG Details 230 and be placed at twelve-foot (12') intervals on straight runs and within curb returns. 3. TESTING. A. All requirements of this section shall be performed under the supervision -•' of a Civil Engineer registered in the State of Arizona. All test reports are to be submitted to the City Engineer. Each report shall indicate the location at which the test was made, the date of the test, type and source of material tested, test designation being used and the name of the person performing the test. B. The following soil tests are the minimum required for pavement design purposes: 1. Samples shall be taken to a minimum depth of eight (8) inches below proposed subgrade elevation. 2. One (1) test per eight hundred (800) lineal feet with at least one test per proposed street. An additional test may be ordered by the City Engineer at apparent visible changes in soil type. 3. Each sample shall have a sieve analysis per AASHO T27 with results reported as percent passing #200 sieve, plus a plasticity index per AASHO T91. 1. r 4 determined by laboratory tests of the subgrade materials, with a minimum of six inches (6") . B. Asphaltic Concrete - To meet Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Specifications, Section 710. Minimum asphalt content shall be 5% unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Engineer. C. Seal Coat - A preservative seal, conforming to MAG Specifications, Section 718, shall be applied to the finished Asphaltic Concrete surface at the rate of 0. 10 gallons of diluted mixture per square yard. The dilution shall be two (2) parts of the concentrate to one (1) part water. No sanding will be required. D. Concrete - Concrete for all structures, curb, gutter, sidewalks, driveway entrances, wash crossings and street related concrete construction shall be Class B, conforming to the applicable requirements of Section 725 of the MAG Standard Specifications. E. Reinforced Concrete Pipe - Shall meet MAG Standard Specifications, Section 735. NOTE: Contractor shall notify the Police Department and Fire Department 24 hours prior to completely closing any street. 5. PERMITS The Contractor shall secure a City Engineering Department Permit prior to start of any construction within public right of way. Three (3) sets of approved plans must be submitted with the application at least five (5) working days before work is scheduled to begin. 3. CHAPTER 4 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES I . SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. All work and materials shall conform to the current "Uniform Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction - Maricopa Association of Governments" , subject to City of Apache Junction supplement, as these Uniform Standard Specifications apply to trench back- fill material, backfill compaction and roadway surface restoration , except as noted in these Special Provisions. In case of conflict between the Uniform Standard Specifi- cations and these Special Provisions , these Special Pro- visions shall govern. Other agency specifications for construction material or methods which are equal to the Uniform Standard Specifications, may be substituted as satisfactory alternates , only with prior written approval of the City Engineer at no cost to the City of Apache Junction . II. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEERING A. Preparation of plans, specifications, construction and inspection shall be performed under the super- vision of a Civil Engineer, registered in the State of Arizona and employed by the owner, except that plans prepared by utility companies for distribution of gas, electric power or for communication service need not be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer . B . Plans shall be submitted as outlined in the City of Apache Junction Development Guide , except as modi- fied by these Special Provisions . Profiles will be required on projects involving installation of sewer and underground irrigation lines in dedicated right- of-way. Power facilities must also be submitted in profile where the trade size of a single conduit exceeds six inches ( 6") in diameter or where multiple conduits including the concrete encasements are sixty ( 60) square inches or greater in cross-sectional area . In addition, profiles may be required by the City Engineer in cases of possible alignment or grade con- flicts, cover problems or crossing conflicts . Plans may be submitted concurrently with the application for construction permit. 1. d. For a trench where the centerline is more than one foot from the edge of the exist- ing pavement, back of curb or sidewalk, or edge of the traveled way on an unpaved road , the material from twelve inches (12") above the top of the pipe to finished grade shall consist of sound earth material as previously speci- fied, compacted to not less than 85% of the maximum density of the material . Water settl- ing as defined herein is permissible . e . For trenches in alleys and other miscellaneous traveled ways, the backfill and compaction as per paragraph III . B. 2 . d . shall be followed . f. For trenches in utility easements the backfill may consist of sound earth material . Water settling as defined herein is permissible . g. Water settling as permitted herein shall be performed with lifts not exceeding five feet ( 5' ) in depth . The backfill shall be leveled, the trench flooded and the material jetted to : (1) Within one foot (1 ' ) of the pipe if the lift is five feet ( 5' ) or less from the top of the pipe, or (2) at least one foot (1 ' ) into the pre- vious lift if multiple lifts are nec- essary . Sufficient water must be used with a pressure of at least 30 p . s . i . to insure filling of all voids with backfill material . Intervals of jetting shall be not more than six feet (6' )' along the trench and transversely across the trench. The water shall not be shut off until the jet has been completely withdrawn from the material . h. Water settling is permitted in new subdivisions but no paving will be permitted over water settled trenches until compaction test results have been approved by the City Engineer . 3. C . The minimum cover for utility lines shall be thirty- six inches (36") , other than direct burial cable which shall be twenty-four inches (24") . The minimum cover for storm drainage or irrigation pipe shall be eighteen inches (18") . Cover is defined as the difference in elevation between the top of the line or pipe and the ultimate gutter grade of the roadway . If paving is not completed within thirty (30) days after installation of the underground facilities , a temporary earth cover sufficient to meet the above requirements must be placed and maintained . For facilities outside the limits as defined in para- graph III. B . 2 . d . above, cover is defined as the difference in elevation between the top of the line or pipe and the natural or regraded ground surface whichever is lesser. D. TESTING. 1. Procedures . a . AASHTO T99 - Maximum density . b. AASHTO T147 - Field density . c . AASHTO T27 - Sieve analysis . 2. Frequency. The tests shall be made at the locations and depths specified by the City Engineer or his representative . A minimum of one set of tests will be required for each four feet (4 ' ) of trench depth for trenches within a paved road or within one half the trench depth measured from back of curb or edge of pavement to centerline of the trench. Otherwise, one set of tests will be required for each eight feet (8 ' ) of trench depth. The minimum number of passing tests per set anticipated for specification compliance may be estimated as follows : a. Pavement cut crossing - one (1) set of tests per crossing. b. Longitudinal pavement cuts or the centerline of the trench within one-half the trench depth as previously explained - one set of tests per three hundred feet (300 ' ) with one set of tests minimum. c . All other locations - one set of tests per four hundred feet (400 ' ) with one set of tests minimum. (Including unimproved (ungraded) right-of-way) . 3 . Tests may be taken at four foot (4 ' ) vertical incre- ments in the same vertical plane at the option of the inspection engineer. Copies of all test reports shall be identified as to project and location by the test- ing laboratory and forwarded to the inspection engineer 4. who shall forward one set of all test results to the City Engineer. As an alternative, the trench may be backfilled with ABC Slurry, on a case-by-case basis with approval by the City Engineer. 4. At his discretion, the City Engineer may order load tests performed to determine the suitability and adequacy of backfill before placement of pavement. Such tests shall be performed with vehicle loaded �.� to approximately eighteen thousand pound (18 , 000#) axle load. Excessive movement or settlement of backfill shall be cause for rejection of the work by the City. Initial load tests shall be at the expense of the City. If the work is rejected , load retests shall be at the expense of the owner or contractor. IV. PAVEMENT CUTTING AND RESTORATION (See M. A. G. Std. Detail 200) A. All cuts in asphalt or concrete pavement shall have saw cut or neat and straight edges. All transverse or diagonal pavement shall extend at least one foot (1 ' ) beyond either side of the trench. Excavated pavement material shall be removed from the site. B. Pavement cut replacement : The asphaltic material used for replacement of pavement cuts shall conform to the applicable M. A. G. Standard Specification for mix C-3/4, Section 710. The thickness of the pavement and aggregate base replaced shall be consistent with the thickness of the existing asphalt pavement and base, but shall not be less than 2 inches (2") of asphaltic pavement over nine inches (9") compacted depth, of aggregate base compacted to 100% of maximum density for the material . �► For Portland Cement concrete paving cut replacement, this same specification will apply. The existing pavement shall be trimmed to a neat edge and the edge shall be treated with a proper emulsion to insure a bond between the existing pavement and the patch. It is requred that all roadway crossing of lines 4" in diameter or less be bored or pushed under pavement which is less than five (5) years old . Where boring is impossible due to caliche or rock, trenching may be allowed with written authorization by the City Engineer . V. SURFACE RESTORATION OF GRAVELLED OR EARTH SURFACE ROADS . The surface replacement for gravel surfaced roads shall be consistent with the existing surface material in place, and may consist of Select Material or A. B . C. as directed by the City Engineer . Fill placed on existing gravel surfaced roads or earth surfaced roads to obtain minimum allowable cover over the pipe or utility lines shall be placed to proper grade for the 5 . Adift _ full widths of the existing roadway and shall be compacted and graded to the satisfaction of the City Engineer . VI. MISCELLANEOUS. The Contractor shall secure a City Engineering Department Permit prior to start of any construction operations within City right-of-way . Three (3) sets of approved plans must be submitted with the application at least five (5) working days before work is scheduled to begin. .�. The permittee shall notify the property owner or resident of adjoining occupied property at least two (2) working days prior to disruption of access to the property, and at no time deny access to the property longer than one (1) normal working day, and shall provide plank for crossings, if necessary. The permittee shall maintain all existing traffic control signs within the construction area, and shall reset all signs in their original locations as soon as construction operations will permit . The permittee shall place and maintain traffic warning devices during the course of work, as required by the City Engineer . Only rubber-tired equipment shall be used on pavement. Water or approved dust palliative in sufficient quantities shall be applied during all phases of construction involving open earth work to prevent the unnecessary discharge of dust and dirt into the air. During the course of work, the permittee shall maintain the work area in a clean and orderly condition . Excess excavation, debris , etc . , will not be permitted to accumulate on the road surface or shoulders . Work shall progress in such a manner that no condition such as soft trenches, drop-offs from the edge of pavement , etc. , will exist . Upon completion of install- ation, the permittee shall clean the pavement surface, pull and dress shoulders , and otherwise put in order the entire work area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer . NOTE : Contractor shall notify the City Engineer, the Police Department and the Fire Department 24 hours prior to completely closing any street for construction. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: S°'` YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON I COUNCILMAN EIDSON V COUNCILMAN SHANKS \l fx VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO I MAYOR CLARKE V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH UNANI'IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED : ABSTAINED TOTAL :02-- , (,:ket(___Lc___ , 1 ce_rej — . _ . . .. _ a---/-;;;CE-4.._ J �_ erl'ICI (-) �F�) �a"fo�J ITEM NO , 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT F THE RESOLUTION NO , 82-34, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CHAPTER 3, CITY OF APACHE EF JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND CHAPTER , CITY APACHE JUNCTION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, WHICH WILL BE ADDED TO THE CODE OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, VOLUME II , LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED . (c?1\CH6" ,-- ,..,1/4 Gti U „4r:d !. :, Z 4P,ZONP c6 it/ o f &ipacI e unction June 8, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: (,,t1-`3 OE GERO for DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE ICHARD BROMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS , ART ALLEN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT• REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - ORDINANCE NO. 151 ADOPTION OF CHAPTERS 3 & 4 of LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Chapters 3 and 4 of the Land Development Code are proposed to be those documents made a public record by Resolution No. 82-34 and entitled Chapter 3, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Street Improvements and Chapter 4, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Installation of Underground Utilities. As of this date, only minor technical comments have been made by those wishing to take advantage of the thirty-day review period. These comments have been considered and have resulted in minor alterations to the draft copies of the documents where they were not contrary to the best interests of the city. During the thirty-day period prior to the ordinance becoming effective, the staff will take measures to formally notify by letter all utilities, contractors, and others normally working in city rights-of-way. The notification will speak to the ordinance requirements and the need for permits to perform any work in the rights-of-way. Attached for Council information is a copy of the four-part permit which is to be used as indicated in the documents. The staff is ll� recommending no fee for permits at this time. Approver for Agenda _-.-. ._....._ Date 1 Item First Reading �1154a. -_ . JWG:rl b Second Reading .� ___X- ,_ , V----Public Hearing .- Old Business __-._ New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR RESOLUTION NO , 82-35, DECLARING DEVELOPMENT GUIDE AS PUBLIC RECORD 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , 0ACHF✓ : O '9R/ZONI Vity on ci Iac`2e &unction Approver for Agenda . ___ w_ / Di a, / !tem #' June 8, 1982 First Reading C. ii --.N ,.. .:h Second Reading ._ .. _-�� blic Hearing / Old Business New Business MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: JOE GERO for DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE ,, RICHARD BROMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS t l ART ALLEN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: f REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - RESOLUTION NO. 82-35 DECLARING DEVELOPMENT GUIDE A PUBLIC RECORD ADOPTION OF GUIDE As directed by Council on April 13, 1982, the City Development Guide was published in draft form and made available to the public for a thirty-day review period. Formal written comments have been received from Arizona Water Company and Salt River Project and minor modifi- cations have been incorporated in the final draft. As the city will be continually developing and modifying policy and procedures, it is suggested that routine revisions be made to the guide with the approval of the City Manager, and that major revisions be approved by the City Council . Adoption of Resolution 82-35 would declare the Development Guide a public record. The adoption of the guide would be useful to architects, engineers, and developers in preparing plans for sub- mission to the city. The following motions are requested to be approved: TO ADOPT THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDE AS A PUBLIC RECORD "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Resolution No. 82-35, a resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk and entitled Apache Junction Development Guide, Procedures for Developers and Engineers in Preparing Plans for Review and Approval , which may be referred to as the "City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Development Guide," be and hereby is adopted. " 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 a TELEPHONE(602)982.8002 THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - RESOLUTION 82-35 JUNE 8, 1982 PAGE TWO TO ADOPT THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDE "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache '� Junction, Arizona, that that certain document made a public record by Resolution No. 82-35 and entitled Apache Junction Development Guide, Procedures for Developers and Engineers in Preparing Plans for Review, which may be referred to as the "City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Development Guide," be and hereby is adopted by the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona; "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager upon recommendation of the Development Coordinating Committee, be authorized to approve routine revisions to the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Development Guide in order that the document is current with policy and procedures of the City of Apache Junction, AND that major revisions be submitted and approved by the City Council . " JWG:rlb RESOLUTION NO. 82-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL, WHICH MAY BE REFERRED TO AS THE "CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DEVELOPMENT GUIDE" BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that, 1 The certain document entitled APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL, which may be referred to as the "City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Development Guide", three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk. 2. The certain document entitled APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL, which may be referred to as the "City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Development Guide", contains forty { (40) pages, numbered Title page, Table of Contents, 1 through t1 29, Exhibits A through G, Exhibits H-1 and H-2, and Exhibit I. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS day of , 1982 Mayor Wendell J Clarke ATTEST Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk I APPROVED AS TO FORM City A torney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / S ITEM # MEETING OF m MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL / J ' COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH / COUNCILMAN HUDSON I COUNCILMAN EIDSON YOR CLARKE OUNCILMAN DAMIANO II _COUNCILMAN SHANKS I UNAN I". US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 5A BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-35, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL, WHICH MAY BE REFERRED TO AS THE "CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DEVELOPMENT GUIDE", BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . oinkAPACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL Z `e; AIR/ZONP' CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD Telephone 982-8002 • Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Tentative Development Schedule Page 1 General Information 2 Improvement Plans A. Cover Sheets 4 B. Plan and Profile 7 Check List: A. Streets 8 B. Sewer 10 C. Water 12 D. Storm Drainage I. Preliminary Subdivision Review 14 II. Final Subdivision Review 14 III. Commercial Site Drainage 16 Storm Drainage Policy I. Residential Subdivisions 17 a. Retention Basin Guidelines 17 II. Commercial 18 III. Hydrology Reports 18 Flood Plain Management 22 Landscaping 24 Improvement Security 25 Final Inspection and Acceptance of Improvements 26 Plans Format/Drafting Procedure Federal-Aid Projects 27 EXHIBITS Runoff & Storm Drain Sizing Charts A thru G Landscaping Maintenance Agreement H(1) & H(2) Assurance for Construction of Improvements I Date DEVELOPMENT Developer: Consulting Engr: TENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Start Complete Actual Actual Date Date Start Complete Remarks I� PRE-FINAL RECORDED PLAT WATER PLANS SEWER PLANS PAVING PLANS MOVE DIRT PRE-FINAL GRADE PLACE SEWER PLACE WA1t.Ft • RE-STAKE CONTROL , PLACE POWER PLACE TELEPHONE - - • PLACE GAS PLACE 'CURBS PAVING START OF HOUSING Please provide the name and telephone number of the person responsible for coordinating this development. NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER 1. - GENERAL INFORMATION - 1. The Developer must comply with all requirements of the City of Apache Junction Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable ordinances, rules or regulations. 2. All designs must be in accordance with the 1979 Uniform Standard Details and Specifications published by the Maricopa Association of Governments as amended by the City of Apache Junction. 3. Dedication of street rights-of-way or utility easements must be coordinated through the Engineering Department. 4. All utility developer designs must be in accordance with City Codes, utility company standards and the latest State and County Health Department requirements and approved by all agencies prior to the issuance of the City Permit. 5. The Developer is required to contact private water companies, Mountain Bell, Arizona Public Service and Salt River Project for locations of existing and proposed water mains, buried conduit, gas or cable. Locations must be shown on plans to reduce the possibility of conflict and damage. Conflicts arising from failure to do this shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 6. Where it is determined that a contractor is working on a project without a permit or an official set of stamped, approved drawings by the City of Apache Junction Engineering Department or Building Department, a Stop Work Order will be issued. 7. The Developer shall provide three (3) completed sets of plans for all reviews. 8. Where the project is in conjunction with a planned development, apartment, townhouse or commercial property, three (3) sets of plans should be submitted to the Division of Building Inspection along with the on-site plans. DO NOT SUBMIT PLANS DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING if project is a combination on-site and off-site project. �•. 9. The Developer should not submit preliminary plans unless previously arranged with the Utilities and the City Engineer or Zoning Administrator. 10. The Contractor shall notify El Paso Natural Gas District Superintendent in Phoenix, Arizona (telephone (602) 967-1686) 48 hours prior to commencing construction in the vicinity of El Paso Natural Gas right-of-way in order that El Paso may have a representative present at all times. 11. Final plat and improvement plans shall be submitted for only that area intended to be constructed. Phasing the final plat and improvement plans will not be allowed. 12. A description for "unplatted" easements, rights-of-way, or parcels upon which improvements are being constructed shall be prepared by a registered Engineer or land surveyor licensed in the State of Arizona, signed by the owner and submitted on a form provided by the City to the City Engineer for review and processing. 2. - GENERAL INFORMATION - (cont'd) 13. The Developer shall review all comments made by City departments and make appropriate corrections where required. 14. Street lights are required on all public streets within and adjacent to the proposed project. The Developer shall initiate a request to the Engineering Department to create a street light improvement district. (Refer 22) 15. The Developer is to provide assurance, in a form acceptable to the city, from his financial lender, guaranteeing the off-site improvements. The Developers engineer is to provide construction cost estimates to sub- stantiate the amount, which must be approved by the City Engineer. 16. The improvement plans must include a general master utility layout for the subdivision as one (1) of the front sheets in the total set of plans. 17. The Developer is to provide a copy of the project soil investigation for city review. Any areas of expansive soil will require special treatment during project construction. The Developers engineer shall note these areas and special requirements on the plans. 18. The Developers engineer shall prepare plans in conjunction with horizontal and vertical datum as provided by the City of Apache Junction. 19. Benchmarks and temporary benchmarks shall be indicated on each sheet of the improvement plans. 20. Horizontal coordinates shall be indicated on the final plat at all sub- • division boundaries and indicating lot areas, street areas and tract areas shall be provided in square feet and acres. A subtotal and total of all streets, lots and tracts are to be included. 21. The Contractor shall notify the Blue Stake Center in Phoenix, Arizona, telephone number 602-263-1100 at least two (2) but not more than five (5) .�. working days prior to excavation work. 22. Developer shall coordinate with electric utility, in preliminary plan stage, to plan for underground circuits for future street lights on all streets including arterial streets, underground sprinklers for right-of-way lands- caping, future traffic signals, etc. Installation of conduit street cross- ings for buried electric, telephone, cable TV, etc. , should be considered at this time. 3. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Front or Cover Sheets (24 inches by 36 inches) 1. Small "location" map. 2. Small scale subdivision and sheet index map. 3. List of quantities. 4. Engineer's seal and stamp or approval on each sheet. 5. Location provided for signature of approval for the State and/or County Health Departments. 6. List typical street and alley cross-sections for each situation. Draw typical section for each case not covered by the above standard details and specify fog seal, asphalt mix and base required. 7. List all "City" benchmarks used on this project. (Contact Engineer- ing Department for location and elevation.) Take crossties to Salt River Valley Water Users Association, State, USCGS, G.L.O. and County benchmarks if they are within or adjacent to the project. 8. If details are shown, indicate to which sheet they refer. 9. The following general notes shall be included: A. All work and materials shall conform to the latest Editions of the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Uniform Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction. B. Exact point of matching termination and overlay, if necessary, shall be confirmed in the field by the City Engineer. C. All frames, covers, valve boxes and manholes shall be adjusted to finish grade. D. Construction shall begin when underground utility conflicts have been resolved. E. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to arrange for the relocation and relocation costs of all utilities, by providing utilities advance notice of the project at preliminary plan stage, with suffi- cient time for utilities review, and submitting a utility relocation schedule. F. All work and materials which do not conform to the approved plans and specifications are subject to removal and replacement at the contractor's expense. 4. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - G. The City Engineer may direct the placement of excess material taken from streets during pregrading. H. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to locate and protect all utilities or structures. ^ I. At least 2, but not more than 5 working days prior to excavating in the vicinity of any utility, the contractor shall contact the utility's locating service for field assistance. (Blue Stake-263-1100) J. Dust shall be controlled by watering per air pollution control district of Pinal County. Contractor shall obtain necessary permits. K. All construction water and power shall be obtained and handled by the contractor at his own expense. The contractor shall make his own arrangements to procure and transport water to the construction site. All temporary facilities shall be removed prior to final acceptance by the City. L. Approval is for one year time only. If construction work is not started within one year, the plans shall be brought up to current standards and resubmitted for City approval. M. The City Engineer shall be notified 24 hours prior to any construction work. N. Acceptance of the completed right-of-way improvements will not be given until: a.) Reproducible "as-built" plans have been submitted by a f► Registered Professional Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. When the City Engineer provides inspection, the owner's Registered Engineer shall seal the plans and shall certify that staking was performed under his super- vision and that the "as-built" elevations and dimensions shown on the plans are correct. b.) The owners Registered Engineer shall have certified in writing as to the location and accuracy of all survey monuments. c.) All test reports meeting M.A.G. specifications for compaction and materials are submitted and approved by the City Engineer. 0. The contractor shall comply with the provisions for traffic controls and barricading as per City of Mesa Traffic Barricade Manual. 5. Afttk Ink - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - P. Driveway locations shall be confirmed or approved by the City prior to or during curb construction. The contractor and developer shall be responsible for coordinating the locations for driveways to avoid conflict with utility services. The utility should be advised of any subsequent changes. Q. All gutter grades less than 0.32% must be staked at 15'intervals along the gutter alignment and checked by the City Inspector immediately preceding the pouring of concrete. R. The contractor shall obtain any and all permits required unless otherwise noted. S. Deviations from the approved plan must be approved in writing by the City Engineer prior to scheduling construction. 6. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - PLAN (24 inches by 36 inches) 1. The scale shall not exceed one (1) inch equals 40 feet (horizontal) . 2. Plans must show sizes, types and locations for all existing and new utilities, including services, paving curb, sidewalk, fire hydrants, valves, manholes, and all miscellaneous items of construction; such as street sign posts, driveways, etc. . 3. Submit 3 copies of all drawings for review. One set will be returned with red-lined comments. 4. Where gas is to be installed, separate lines for gas main and service must be shown and labeled on each drawing. 5. Clearly differentiate between new and old improvements, ie. ; (existing 6-inch ACP vs. new 6-inch ACP. Also, shade pavement, etc.). 6. When street grades exceed two percent (0.02 ft./ft.) separate profiles or plan and profile will be required. Vertical scale shall not exceed one (1) inch equals four (4) feet. 7. Final approval and signature will be given only after all other reviewing agencies (County, Health Dept. , Water Com- pany, etc.) have signed the originals. Submit originals and paper reproducible copies for City signature. The reproducible copies will be retained by the City. 8. Reproducible "as-built" plans shall be minimum .003" thick Mylar photocopies or Mylar sepias, able to reproduce legible blueline copies. (See page 27.) 7. AO lb. - IMPROVEMENT PLAN - Streets 1 . Standard width: Section line street : 64 ' full width; Mid- line streets : 50' full width; Collector streets ; 42 ' full width; Residential streets ; 32 ' full width . All widths to back of curb . 2. Minimum gutter grade in the City of Apache Junction is 0.0032. Special approval by the City Engineer is required for grades less than 0.0032. 3• Clearly mark grade changes and grade breaks. 4• Show all horizontal and vertical curve information on the plan. 5. Valley gutters shall have a minimum (0.25) drop across intersections, 6. Curb returns shall have a minimum (0.1) drop. 7. "Grade to daylight" or provide catch basins at the end of new paving projects where necessary. Also provide barricades or delineators where there are traffic hazards immediately following end of project paving. 8. City requires pavement cross-slopes in streets at 0.020'/feet of pave- ment width. (Example: A half street, 14 feet wide (pavement) requires 0.28' crown from centerline of street to lip of gutter.) 9. Six inch (6") thick sidewalk is required for alley and commercial drive- way entrances. All other sidewalks are to be four inches (4") thick. 10. Minimum curb return radii: (Back of curb) residential twenty feet (20') , Collector twenty-five feet (25' ) , Mid-section line thirty feet (30') , Section line thirty-five feet (35' ) . 11. Survey monuments are required at all centerline control points (Brass- caps in concrete). Section corners and quarter corners require brass- caps to be set in concrete and in handholes. 12. Show sufficient pavement tapers at beginning and end of projects to properly channel traffic back to original or new alignment. Tapers shall be of temporary construction consisting of at least two inch (2") asphalt course over six inch (6") ABC. (Tapers shall be installed at 20:1 and are to be sawcut and removed when pavement is extended.) 13 . Show and label the installation of street sign posts at each intersection . (Locations normally coincide with the corner where a STOP sign would be located . ) 14 . Perform a complete field survey and show all existing topo- graphy and what is to be done with it . (Power poles , trees , ditches , and etc . ) 15. Any curb with less than the 0. 32% gutter grade must have a note on the cover sheet , requiring staking along the actual gutter alignment (not offset) and must be checked by the City Inspector immediately preceding the pouring of concrete. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Streets (Cont ' d) 16 . Plans must show installation of a four-inch (4") ABC in alleys or paved (2"A/C over 4" ABC) if to be used as access for resi- dential access or 2" A/C over 6" ABC if used as commercial access to accommodate truck traffic . 17 . Provide sufficient sight clearance where necessary, such as removal of existing obstructions at or near an intersection. 18 . All driveway widths and locations shall be indicated on plan where vertical curb is to be installed. 19. If your project calls for widening an existing pavement to include a new curb and gutter ; be sure elevation shots are provided along the monument line, the sawcut line of the existing new pavement match-point and the gutterline of the proposed curb. 20. Provide ramps for handicapped at all curb returns . 21. Vertical curb (6" face) is required on section and mid-section line streets . Vertical curb shall also be provided on collect- or and residential streets if required to meet hydrologic requ- irements . Roll curb and gutter may be used on residential streets , providing no vertical curb patterns have been install- ed in adjacent developed areas on that street alignment . 22 . Sidewalks shall be 5 ' wide on section line streets and 4 ' wide on all other streets . Meandering sidewalks may be appr- oved on a case-by-case basis ., and shall be reviewed by utilities companies to determine conflicts . 9. SEWER (When Appropriate) NOTE: The City does not have a sewerage distribution system or treat- ment plant at this time. However, if a system is designed to meet the criteria below the City may accept systems , in public streets , for future maintenance, if and when a municipal system is constr- ucted. 1 . All sewer designs and construction must conform to the Arizona Department of Health Services Engineering Bulletin 11 (latest edition) , unless more stringent controls are required by this guide . 2 . Show both on plan and profile the concrete encasement of sewer lines where necessary . 3. Each lot or parcel must be provided with its own individual sewer/septic service unless otherwise approved . The location should be coordinated so as to avoid placement in conflict with proposed driveway locations , possible future pool locations . and utilities . 4 . A note must be on plans for "Contractor to verify elevation of existing sewer stub before proceeding with balance of sewer trenching" . 5. The future need for sewer in the surrounding area with regards to your present design slopes and depth must be considered . 6. In the profile, show the relationship between sewer mains and water mains at each crossing. 7. Both the slope and the end elevation must be shown on all sewer main stubs. ~ 8. Developer ' s engineer is to furnish cut sheets on all sewer main stubs. 9 . Sewer mains shall be low enough to avoid conflicts with all other utilities (water services, telephone company, electric , gas , storm drains , etc. ) and must have a minimum four (4) feet of cover to finished grade. 10. Prior to submitting subdivision improvement plans , a prelim- inary master plan of the sewer with sizes , slopes , manhole flow lines and natural grades should be submitted for review on the preliminary plat for subdivision review. Also provide details and specification of sewerage treatment and/or septic facilities . 11 . Final improvement plans will detail sewerage treatment facilities and indicate provisions for security , operation and maintenance by the owner. (Not required for individual septic tank install • - ations) . 10. SEWER (Cont ' d) 12. Minimum cover over crown of lateral sewer to be minimum of four feet (4 ' ) at the property line. 13. Manhole diameter to be four feet (4 ' ) , providing sewer is a lateral line. 14 . If the manhole is on a trunk line, main, or branch line , and more than ten feet (10 ' ) deep , or the line is over twelve inches (12") in diameter, the manhole is to be five feet (5 ' ) in diameter. 15 . When a line is extended , but not to the design location for a manhole, a temporary cleanout is acceptable. MINIMUM SLOPES Line Size Min. Design Slopes 4" (taps) . 0050 6" . 0050 8" . 0033 10" .0024 12" . 0019 15" . 0014 NOTE: Other slopes as approved by the City Engineer. CURVED SEWERS Minimum radius 500 feet. Maximum distance between manholes 400 feet , and at each end of the curve. LATERALS a) May have maximum drop of 24-inches (24") without use of drop connection. b) Insure 0 . 10 drop in manholes of 90° bends . c) Use single wyes only. No double wyes . 11. WATER NOTE: The City does not own or operate water distribution systems at this time. However, the following items are jointly required by the City and private utility companies for approval. 1. All water lines to be ACP. 2. All water line design and construction to conform to the Arizona Department of Health Services Engineering Bulletin 10 (latest edition) , unless more stringent controls are required by this guide. 3. Valves at intersections shall be placed opposite the PC of curb returns in such a manner that not more than one hydrant shall be shut-down at any one time. 4. A note is required on the plans : "The Contractor shall be re- quired to install a night tie-in for any new water line that will affect existing service in the opinion of the water company . " 5 . Show water line in a separate trench from other utilities . 6. Review future water extension problems with respect to proposed lines and valves to prevent loss of service to customers. 7 . Fire hydrants are to be placed as indicated by the Fire Chief on a review plan submitted to him by the developer. 8. Normal placement of water mains shall be three feet (3') behind sidewalks on the east or north side of streets . In the case of special half-street situations or unusual conditions , locations shall be confirmed by the Fire Chief, City Engineer, and utility prior to the preparation of plans (unless other- wise specified by the appropriate water company) . 9. Valves on dead end lines shall be placed to cause the least amount of inconvenience to existing services when the line is extended. If the valve is to be placed near the end of the stub, there should be at least two (2) full joints of pipe between the valve and the plug. 10. If a fire hydrant is on a dead end line it will require that the line be at least a six inch ( 6") line up to the hydrant. If more than one hydrant is required on a dead-end line, the line shall be a minimum of eight inches (8") in diameter . 11. Water line sizes shall be determined by the appropriate water company on a review plan submitted to the company by the developer . 12 . - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Water (cont'd) 12. Valves on dead end lines shall be placed to cause the least amount of inconvenience to existing services when the line is extended. If the valve is to be placed near the end of the stub, there should be at least two (2) full joints of pipe between the valve and the plug for lines twelve-inches (12") and larger. One (1) full joint should be installed between valve and plug for lines smaller than twelve-inches (12") . 13. If a fire hydrant is on a dead end line it will require that the line be at least an six-inch (6") line up to the hydrant. If the line is to be extended at least an eight-inch (8") line is re- quired. 14. Thrust blocking shall be provided as per M.A.G. Details and Specifications. .o.. 13. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Storm Drainage I. Preliminary Subdivision Review 1. Submit preliminary drainage report. 2. Show limits of on-site drainage areas and off-site watersheds. 3. Show existing drainage structures such as waste or delivery ditches, channels, etc. 4. What will be done with existing drainage structures? 5. Submit a plat showing drainage pattern of all streets in the subdivision. 6. What is the required retention? ac. ft. 7. What is the retention provided? ac. ft. 8. What is the approximate size and depth of the required basin? x x . (Maximum depth allowed is three and one half feet (3.5) - Maximum side slope 4:1) . 9. What method is available for draining the basin in 36 hours? gravity flow into rate pumped into rate drywells, number approx. depth 10. How will basin be maintained? private homeowner homeowners association other 11. Is it clear what will be done with the storm run-off? 12. Are any special easements needed for pipes, ditches, temporary basins, etc.? II. Final Subdivision Drainage Review * 1. Has a final drainage report been included with the submittal of final plans? 2. Is a plat showing peak street flows and drainage areas included? 3. Are storm drain sizing calculations included? *NOTE: See Storm Drainage Policy for further information. 14. - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Storm Drainage (cont'd) II. (Final Subdivision Drainage Review cont'd.) 4. Are catch basin calculations included? 5. Is a detail drawing of retention basin grading shown? 6. What is the required volume? ac.ft. 7. What is the calculated volume? ac.ft. 8. Are inlet and outlet structures shown? 9. Is lot grading plan included? 10. Method of draining basin in 36 hours? gravity flow into rate pumped into rate drywell, number depth 11. How is basin being maintained? 12. On-lot retention for single family lots will not be allowed unless conditions warrant special consideration as determined by the City Engineer. On-site retention must be accompanied by storm drainage covenants, prepared by the Developer's engineer for all lots or areas that are to retain drainage. This covenant is to be signed by the Developer or Owner and recorded with the subdivision plat. 13. The engineering drawings must designate the type of storm drain pipe to be used including size and slope. Use the following as a guide for choosing pipe required in different situations. A. Reinforced pipe (RCP 36 inches inside diameter or larger and RGRCP any diameter) may be used in all situations. The engineering drawings shall designate the Class of D-load specifications as per ASTM -C-76 and when requested the engineer shall verify his choice of pipe with load computations. B. Non-reinforced pipe (RGCP) - may be used in easements outside the limits of paving, sidewalks, or alleys. The engineering drawings shall designate the class of pipe as per ASTM-C-14 and the engineer is required to provide load calculations to justify the use of this pipe. 15. olak - IMPROVEMENT PLANS - Storm Drainage (cont'd) - III. Commercial Site Drainage and all other Development not previously mentioned. 1. Have all property lines, proposed or existing buildings, asphalt, grass, desert landscape and concrete areas been shown and the dimensions of same? 2. Are all existing grades shown, either by a grid method or contour lines especially at property lines, driveways and sidewalks? 3. Has the finished grade of all surfaces been indicated? 4. Is the finished floor elevation shown? 5. Is the direction of roof drainage shown? 6. Are all items of construction that will affect drainage shown? 7. Is the lot divided into drainage areas and calculations shown for runoff and retention of each area? 8. Were the correct runoff coefficients used? 9. What method of draining the retention area is provided? 16. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY I. RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS A. All water which falls within the subdivision from a ten-year (10) storm of 24 hour duration, (approximately 2.4 inches) , must be retained within the boundaries of that subdivision. The method of retention is left up to the developer and requires the approval of the City Engineer. Two (2) or more developers may join together to provide a larger retention facility to accomodate the runoff for more than one (1) subdivision if all other criteria are met. B. Streets must be constructed to carry the runoff from a ten-year (10) storm between the curbs. In cases where the peak flows from the design storm exceed the street capacity, underground pipes of sufficient size to carry the excess must be installed. Storm drains when designed as independent structures shall accomo- date a 10-year (10) storm. -See attached Capacity Chart (Exhibit A) . C. The peak flows from a 100-year (100) storm must be carried within the cross section between finished grade at buildings. (Front yards and street) D. I. Retention basins are permitted to a maximum of three and one half feet (3.5) in depth and must be constructed so that rainwater will stand no longer than 36 hours from the end of the storm. Except in special circumstances, they must be drained by pumping or controlled gravity flow. 2. PROPOSED WATER RETENTION BASINS IN SALT RIVER PROJECT TRANSMISSION LINE RIGHTS-OF-WAY: a. Retention basins are to be rectangular in design with a maximum slope of 2:1 on all four sides. b. The top of the slope must be a minimum of fifty feet (50) from the legs of a tower or the edge of a pole. A minimum 12 foot wide access road must be provideed continuously between towers or poles. c. The dirt slope adjacent to the tower or pole must be protected either with sod, gunite, gabion, rip-rap, or plastic sheets with rock covering, as approved by Salt River Project. d. If a water flow is required between any two retention basins, it must be constructed of pipe. An open lateral ditch is not acceptable. e. Trees will be limited to those with a mature height of fifteen (15) feet. f. Developer shall submit drawings to the City and Salt River Project for approval. The Salt River Project will consider both existing and planned future power facilities in their review. When approved by Salt River Project, a letter shall be forwarded to the City. 17. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd) E. Where practical, it is recommended that retention areas be made a part of a privately owned lot and covered by a drainage easement. If the basin retains water from a subdivision which has a co-oper- ative type homeowners association, the maintenance of this basin must be done by the association. If the basin is to be constructed on a parcel of land which will not be sold and the maintenance responsibilities of which are not specifically defined, it will be necessary for the developer to install complete improvements on the parcel and to make necessary provisions for its continuous mainten- ance. F. Existing major water courses shall be maintained and dedicated as drainage ways and shall not be altered from their natural locations at the perimeter of the project. Street crossings for these water courses shall be sized for a 10-year flood event. Refer to Bureau of Public Roads Hydraulic Engineering Circular #5, September, 1961. II. COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, RESIDENTIAL (EXCEPT INDIVIDUAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES) . A. All storm water from a 10-year storm of twenty-four (24) hour duration (approximately 2.4 inches) must be retained on-site. (Includes street areas.) B. There must be some method of draining all retention areas within 36 hours. Percolation by surface spreading in a landscape area is an acceptable method, if the 10-year storm creates no more than twelve inches (12") ponding on the landscape area. Dry wells are not desirable, but may be acceptable providing percolation tests are submitted and approval of the City Engineer is obtained. III. HYDROLOGY REPORTS A. Commercial and all other development not previously mentioned. 1. Submit a site plan which shows the following: a. All proposed buildings, asphalt, grass, concrete or desert landscape and dimensions of same. b. Existing and finished grades of all surfaces (especially finished floor elevations) and at property lines and back of sidewalks. 2. Compute the amount of runoff to be retained by dividing the site into individual drainage areas and applying the follow- ing formula to each area. Submit all calculations for review. 18. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd.) Volume of Runoff = Area in SQ. FT. x 0.20 x C (cu.ft.) Where C = .95 concrete C = .85 building roof or asphalt C = .70 desert landscaping C = .25 bare ground C = .15 grass landscaping 3. Provide retention for volume of water as found in 2 above. It is recommended that parking areas be graded to drain toward a landscaped area. When this is done, a light rain will drain away with little or no ponding on the paved surface. A storm of greater intensity will back up on the pavement, but the water should recede before it can damage the parking lot surface. 4. Provide some method of draining the retention volume by sur- facing spreading in a landscape area or a controlled connection to a wash or storm drain. Drywells are permitted when approved by the City Engineer, if no other solution can be found. B. Residential Subdivisions 1. Preliminary Reports a. A preliminary drainage report must be presented with the application for preliminary subdivision review. No engin- eering review will be scheduled without this report. This report shall be on separate, letter-size sheets with any necessary maps. Handwritten comments on a plan sheet are not acceptable. b. Delineate the boundaries of the drainage area or watershed. �'► If the subdivision is subject to off-site drainage, include the applicable off-site areas. c. Indicate any existing drainage or irrigation structures such as: waste or delivery ditches, natural drainage channels, etc., and what will be done with them. d. Indicate on a plat drawing the drainage pattern of all streets. e. Indicate the retention volume required and present a preliminary retention basin plan including size, depth and method of draining it. f. Maximum depth of basin shall not exceed three and one half (3.5) feet. g. Indicate proposed maintenance and method of draining the basin in 36 hours. 19. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd.) • III. HYDROLOGY REPORTS (Cont'd) 2. Final Reports a. A final hydrology report must be submitted with the initial submittal with the engineering plans. Report shall be on letter-size sheets with necessary maps neatly folded, all in a binder. b. Justify the runoff factor ("C" factor) used in the comput- ations by taking a typical lot cross-section and computing a weighted runoff factor using the following coefficients: Concrete Pavement . . . .95% Asphaltic Pavement. . . .85% Building Roofs 857 Desert Landscape . . . . 70% Bare Ground 25% Grass Landscape 15% c. A map is to accompany the report which delineates clearly the different areas to be considered and labels by number the different critical points or where inlets are to be located. d. Each sub-area is to be analyzed for the peak flow generated by a ten (10) year storm on the chart labeled "Peak Flow from Sub-Areas". Use the velocities for time of concentration and intensity charts found in this guide. Use the rational method, as presented in the Arizona Highway Department Manual: "Hydrologic Design for Highway Drainage". e. Place inlets wherever the flow exceeds the street capacity — according to the charts in this guide. The inlets are to be analyzed separately and catch basin computations shall be submitted. f. Size the storm drains and submit design computations if applicable. g. If storm runoff flows onto the property to be subdivided from adjacent properties, this must be included in detail, in the report. Drainage area, calculated peak flows, and other pertinent runoff data must be presented. If the flow is in a defined channel, the channel must be improved. An eight (8) foot bottom to accommodate maintenance vehicles is required. Special consideration of the use of open channels is to be given on each individual project, by the City Engineer. The runoff from areas outside the subdivision may be carried through the new subdivision. 20. STORM DRAINAGE POLICY (Cont'd) III. HYDROLOGY REPORTS (Cont'd.) B. 2. Final reports (cont'd) h. Compute the amount of retention volume required using the following formula: Drainage Area (acres) x C x .20 = retention volume AC-FT. i. Clarify responsibility and maintenance of the basin. J . Clarify the method of draining the basin in 36 hours. Except in special circumstances as approved by the City Engineer, they shall be drained by pumping or con- trolled gravity flow. C. Use design charts and forms as provided herein. 21. VII Flood Plain Management The City of Apache Junction having entered into the Flood Insurance Program by resolution 79-41 adopted on November 7, 1979, is required to provide adequate flood plain management and control measures, with effective enforcement, consistant with criteria set forth by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and section 1910 of the National Flood Insurance Program Regulations. This action allows the community to acquire federally subsidized flood insurance, provides for local flood plain management, allows for a unified national program for managing flood losses and provides for safer living conditions. A copy of the Federal register dated October 26, 1976, reprinted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development - Federal Insurance Administration - National Flood Insurance Program, is on file with the City Planning Director, Zoning Administrator and City Engineer. The following excerpts are taken from the referenced Federal Register: 1. Flood Insurance shall not be sold or renewed unless the community has adopted and uniformly enforces adequate minimum flood plain management regulations. 2. Requires building sites will be reasonably safe from flooding and constructed to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement, with materials resistant to flood damage and by methods to minimize flood damage. Specific requirements are provided for mobile homes and trailers. 3. Requires public utilities (includes septic systems) and facilities to be constructed to minimize flood damage and prevent infiltration of flood waters and systems contamination. 4. Requires confirmation that alteration or relocation of a watercourse (wash) does not adversley effect upstream and down stream properties. 5. Requires assurances that the flood carrying capacity within altered or relocated portions of watercourses (washes) are maintained. 6. Requires evacuation plan and alternate vehicular access and escape routes be provided in Arizona. 7. Requires a Registered professional engineer or architect shall certify that flood proofing methods are adequate to withstand the flood depths, pressures, velocities, impact, up-lift forces and other factors associated with the base flood elevation. 8. Requires compliance by new construction or expansion by existing developments or when repair, reconstruction or improvement equals or exceeds fifty (50%) percent of the value of the existing development. 9. Requires all encroachments, including fill, new construction be prohibited so as not to increase the base flood elevation more than one foot at any point. 22. i p Flood Plain Management (cont'd) 10. Requires the placement of new mobile home placement be prohibited within regulatory floodways. 11. Variances: a. Granting a variances is generally limited to lot sizes of less than one half (z) acre. b. Variances shall not be issued within a designated floodway if any increase in flood levels would result. c. Variances shall only be issued with a showing of good and suffi- cient cause and exceptional hardship, providing the variance will not result in increased flood heights, threats to public safety, public expense, nuisances or conflicts. d. Variances will result in increased premium rates for flood insur- ance as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage. 12. Suspension of the community flood insurance program will result for failure to adopt or enforce flood plain management regulations. In order to comply with Federal requirements Developers and engineers shall provide the City Engineer with the following infor- mation: 1. Confirm what flood zone the development is located within. 'm. 2. Confirm the base flood (Q100) elevation. 3. Confirm the lowest floor (including basement) is elevated or flood proofed to or above the base flood level (additional six (6) inch freeboard flood elevation is recommended) . 4. Confirm watercourses enter and leave areas to be developed in their natural locations, and that flows or highwater elevations are not increased to the detriment of upstream and downstream properties. 5. Insure that hydrologic data is presented in accordance with the storm drainage policy in this guide. 23. Aism. Am. VIII LANDSCAPING All plans for landscaping within the City rights-of-way shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The Developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement on the form provided by the City . (See Exhibit "H") Landscaping themes already initiated within a quarter mile of the proposed development, should be continued, except as required by the City Engineer . 24 . IX IMPROVEMENT SECURITY Prior to the construction of street improvements the subdivider/ owner/developer shall provide security by either: (1) posting a performance bond issued by a qualified surety; (2) establishing a cash trust, said funds to be deposited with the City to the credit of the subdivider; (3) depositing with the City a certificate of deposit issued by a banking institu- tion authorized to issue same; or (4) filing with the City an executed letter of assurance or contract of guarantee between the City and a trust company, banking insitution, or other financial institution approved by City, and author- ized to enter into such contracts; (5) the amount of said security is to be based upon the cost estimate prepared by a registered professional civil engineer or licensed contractor in an amount to cover the completed installation of the improve- ments, and requires approval by the City Engineer; p (6) a completed date for the improvements shall be declared by the subdivider and the security shall provide for its forfeiture to the City in the event that said improvements were started and have not been completed or not accepted by the City. See Exhibit "I". 25. Final Inspection and Acceptance of Improvements Upon due notice from the developer of presumptive completion of all improvements as called for on the approved improvement plans, the City will make an inspection. If all construction is found to be completed to his satisfaction, then that inspection shall constitute the final inspection and the City Engineer will recommend final ac- ceptance of the public improvements (including street, sewer and drainage improvements) to the City Council upon receipt of the follow- ing items: 1. As-built plans drawn in india ink, or a reproducible linen, mylar or sepia copy thereof, showing all street, drainage and sewer improvements constructed, and copies of the final plans showing all electrical, lighting, gas, telephone, cable television and water improvements constructed within the public rights-of-way or public easements for inclusion in the City's permanent files. Final plans shall show the approved design conditions and re- flect any field changes approved by the City Engineer, and the developer's engineer shall certify that the final plans represent as nearly as possible the actual field conditions as constructed. 2. Affidavit regarding settlement of claims: The developer shall certify that all bills for labor and materials incorporated in the work have been paid and agree to indemnify and save harmless the City against any and all liens, claims of liens, suits, actions, damages, charges and expenses whatsoever, which the City may suffer arising out of the failure of the developer to pay for all labor performed and materials furnished in the con- struction of the required improvements. 3. Guarantee: The developer and contractor shall guarantee all work against defective workmanship or materials for a period of one (1) year from the date of its final acceptance by the Mayor and City Council. Upon final acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council, the City Engineer will notify the developer in writing of this acceptance as of the date of approval by the Council. 26. _ANS FORMAT AND DRAFTING PR.,.,EDURE ' FOR FEDERAL-AID URBAN SYSTEM STREETS PROJECTS Consultants retained by the City, preparing plans for federal-aid projects shall comply to the latest requirements of the Arizona Department of Transportation. Arizona Department of Transportation Standards as received by the City on February 4, 1981 are as follows: The consultant should confirm these requirements are up to date prior to starting any City project. GENERAL. Detail Plans are prepared to provide the prospective bidder with all details and information necessary to a concise conception of the work to be done; they also provide a gauge for determining that all intents of the improvement have been fulfilled. Workmanship, neatness, accuracy, and attention to detail are coordinated toward ease of reading and singleness of interpretation. PLAN SET FORMAT. All sheets are 22" x 36" overall; reproducible paper, linen, or plastic. Sequence of sheets is as follows: (1) Face Sheet(s) (Provided by ADOT) (2) Design Sheet(s) (3) List of Standards Sheets (Provided by ADOT) (4) Plan Summary Sheet(s) (5) Special Detail Sheet(s) (6) Structure Summary Sheets (If Required) (7) Plan and/or Profile Sheet(s) (8) Earthwork Sheet(s) (If Necessary) Ask (9) Traffic Sheet(s) (If Required) • (10) Roadside Development Sheet(s) (If Required) (11) Structures Section Sheet(s) (If Required) (12) Materials Division Sheet(s) (Provided by ADOT) FACE SHEET. Standard sheets are provided by highway designation, each sheet being usable for one or more projects. A location map is centered on the sheet with provision in the lower right corner for FHWA and Departmental approval signatures. Use of the standard Face Sheet(s) requires the addition of the county or counties involved, the project number, and the location shown and exaggerated in red on the map portion of all preliminary copies as well as the finished reduced-size copy(s) . The Face Sheet is illustrated by Standard P-1 .10.1 (Provided by ADOT.) DESIGN SHEET. This sheet(s) shows length of project, index of sheets, general notes, present and design ADT, design speed, and a fully- dimensioned typical roadway cross-section(s) and pavement structure 1"Drafting Standards For Use In Office and Field" 1979, ADOT 27 . composition. If required, tables are used to show location of changes in select material thickness, or other pavement structure composition thicknesses, additions or deletions, cut ditch dimensions and cut and embankment slopes. Space and number of Plan Summary Sheet items per- mitting, this sheet may also include Plan Summary Sheet information. See Standards P-2.20, P-2.30, P-4.10. LIST OF STANDARD SHEETS. These sheets are unruled and list all appli- cable roadway Standard Drawings - Construction Details by number, name, and latest revision date. See example, Standard P-3.10. (Pro- vided by ADOT, listed as 2A on Index.) PLAN SUMMARY SHEET. This sheet(s) lists summarized quantities, dimen- sional specifications, and earthwork for all pipe culvert, storm sewer, and drainage-related items except box culverts and bridges, which are subject to Structures Section Standards and listed on the Structure Summary Sheet, and ditch, channel, and dyke earthwork which is listed on the profiles and included in the Earthwork Sheet. See Standards P-4.20, P-4.30, P-4.40, and P-4.50. SPECIAL DETAIL SHEET. This sheet(s) provides construction drawings of all miscellaneous, non-standard items not subject, wholly or in part, to Standard Drawings - Construction Details or Standard Drawings - Structures. See Standard P-5.10, for example. STRUCTURE SUMMARY SHEETS. These sheets summarize information on Structures Section items as follows: (Sheets available from ADOT.) (1) Separate summaries of reinforced concrete box culverts and spans over 20' , showing Station, Description, Special Details Sheet Number, applicable Structures Section Standards, and material, excavation, and backfill quantities. (2) A summary of Bridge and Miscellaneous Structures showing Stationing, Description, Special Details Sheet Number and applicable Structures Dection Standards. Quantities for this category are shown on the appropriate Special Detail Sheet. (3) General Notes and Joint Notes. Standards P-6.10, P-6.20, and P-6.30 illustrate sample Structure Summary Sheets. PLAN AND/OR PROFILE SHEET. This sheet(s) is prepared on tracing material having a ruled grid bottom half for the profile portion,or two separate sheets, one plain for the plan and one ruled for the profile view. The scale to be used is such that existing detail and proposed work can be presented accurately and legibly. Wehn ink is not used, the rapidograph pen size is a general guide for the appropriate pencil width needed for all lettering or line work. Dimensional and lettering standards for titles, identification data, etc. are shown on the sample plan and/or profile sheets, Standards P-7.10, P-7.20, P-7.30, P-7.40, P-7.50 and P-7.60. Lettering on drawings should be single stroke gothic style, 28. or as shown in ADOT'S "Drafting Standards For Use In Office And Field", 1979. Line widths and symbols are illustrated by Standard Drawings P-0.20 and P-0.30. Nonstandard symbols and abbreviations must be promin- ently displayed and explained in a legend. Both superelevation and superelevation transition are assumed to be standard; if they are other than standard, their values shall be indicated by means of a diagram and by notation on the plan. (1) THE PLAN PORTION. This part of the Plan or Plan and Profile Sheet is generally drawn to a 1"=100' scale for rural roadways. Plans for interchange, urban, and other areas of considerable detail are drawn to scales of 1"=50' or 1"=20' as required for ease of reading and interpretation. For the 1"=100' scale, all main roadway sheets except, possibly, the first and last sheets, carry thirty stations with the beginning and ending stations being divisible by thirty. Similarly, 1"-50' carries fifteen stations and l"-20' , six stations. (2) THE PROFILE PORTION. This part of the Profile or Plan and Profile Sheet is drawn to the same horizontal scale as the plan portion. Generally, the ratio of horizontal scale to vertical scale is 10:1. EARTHWORK SHEET. This sheet(s) is fully-ruled and shows graphically the excavation, embankment, hauls, overhauls, borrow, borrow pit locations, balance points, and shrinkage factors concerned with the total earthwork for the project; it also shows the stationing and quantities, included in the overall earthwork project, of excavation and embankment for ditches, dykes, and channels. See illustration, Standard P-8.10. TRAFFIC SHEET. This sheet(s) provides all detail concerned with signing, lighting, traffic control, and delineation. ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT SHEET. This sheet(s) provides all detail concerned with landscaping, landscaping irrigation, rest areas, and other roadside beautification and driver-convenience facilities. STRUCTURES SECTION SHEET. This sheet(s) provides all non-standard detail for the structures summarized by the Structure Summary Sheet. MATERIALS SERVICES SHEETS. These sheets are prepared by Materials Services and comprise: (1) Sketch maps of borrow and aggregate sources. (2) Test results for borrow and aggregate sources. (3) Subgrade information and soil profile. These data are provided only as information for the prospective bidder and are not a part of the contract papers. 29. e'S PS COMPUTCD FROM MANNING'S FORMULA n=0 012 1 ,: 5000 li; ii • . t t 1 i j !i !.11111i11 ,11! It1.1111' 1111 1.1 Ili ,III I., 11 1 ij-. Cr, NI I'll LI-' 0-+. r Olt 1;': i t-1-1i• jj ' i t ! Ift 111' t !1 'i 1:; i' , !�, i t1=t'1=�. tilt ;.,. t »; l ; ,I .,t} !" „ it 3000 • 2000 !i i ::,1 ler it : pi, 4;, Itti ".; pt:ippr-it, ..,,, ,,!ippor- ,,,. ' i• ;vow:.1 , ,,; ,1Zit -10 it.. ...,L I.. 0 1 i. ',: . l "I: 1.1,- .1 ,41i 1,014.1117-, ;,, 00 0 . .•, i i , ,1 ,i,.,,.„, :, iP el o 91111�� 1000 " ;'tInIl lf1111i�' ' `,= om 1 ... a` tlgii7 � 600 ado • 1.1:1 /• ni ,,1\ 'i i+� ;1-• � 1 .\ •:. t i •!'� I itI ¶•I. IN eA/ ii ; � ' . -1411,*.1, , . , e� : ::: , ' 'ZIONIP i ..a � �I , W itigMapiiraigo i' O.: - op 1 I1- tI ' . -� .i 'It ,6,•1 ' {it ''' I ' -1 1,• 1t1 1- I 1 , ' ,l ,, 100 w .... —;-...imo it_Li wow—, murridup... 90,,, ,o, 'Lt.' '' .r/ ,,��// I � 40 1,1 30 c 7: _PPP" 4.11111 .11PP-..wil liMprilittgA.Npl"1 - . P" OPplOw , Vi...edirik20 a . 0.'..101.1110PIP.7 . "1... i-.."Riggrilirliglillitilat diPPY ' ' r.17.4 .. 1. :t , 111P1 ' ,1111101\ . 011ardISIMUWAIMMOMPVIr4 ..► Off if �' .T� • ►.. t i/. i�� da ; kl�t•�p Rapti 1i1 8 �1111MM LIMA 1 � D �dMillt�q �Yl�ni 6 :, . ._,Iddl-i: gidi • i . '', • ill iinignignifillii" 4 . `` : t I ' is rat i' ,. 'i , 4 D..I8 .r=? : ) ,� .11111111111111111't;' 2 �1= e. - , t ('' •; " =:� 71 Lam' ,+ ,.. it. .1iL _c _,-1-t, ` :If„' 14 t, ,.. ;;: illl_I_+tr •••• fill_:-+.1 :It/ .— t +"-. . .:1f i}}It :4i; 14 . jj ' :e, rii.ipsiit!,.14 +1' r.fi F li + U Et III , ■ yf 1 I 3 4 .5 1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30 50 SLOPE IN FEET PER THOUSAND PIPE cLP1 c Es • FLOWING FULL • EXHIBIT "A" STORM SEWER DESIGN CHART (10 Year Frequency) Subdivision Name. 1 Q = Total flow in the street and pipe. Designed By. QSt = Portion of Q that bypasses the storm sewer inlets at this location and flows in the street. This must not exceed this Date Qp = Protion of Q that enters the storm sewer Location Drainage Area Time of Flow Min I Q Qst Street Sewer Design Hydraulic Grade Line Lire +o From _ To No. Increm Inlet Sewer Design in./hr cfs Capacity Qp Pipe Dia Vel Length Sf Elevation , point Point CA CA Slope In fps ft./ft ® Inlet Outlet imiii Huilsamm nommio III IllEirillil MI IIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIMIIIII MI IIIIIIIIMIIM1MllMIIII IIII . 11111111111111111111111111111MIIIIIIllaulli 11111111111111.11111111 IIII I I 111111111111 rIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!IMMIIIIIIIIIIMIMII 1 7 1 I- • -- CATCH BASIN CAPACITY CHART ( Q = incremental flow in the street Qb = flow bypassing the catch basin being analyzed or an upstream catch basin Qin = Q entering a catch basin d = Depth of ponded water over a catch basin in a sump or the depth of water at the gutter, if the catch basin is on grade. Slope = longitudial slope for catch basin on grade Point No. = Points of location for catch basins, to be the same as used in the com- putation of the peak flow from subareas. Point Q Qb d Slope Qin Qb Street Type of Number No. Ca.acit C.B. Used Used MI ME 11111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIII ' ( MIMI IIMIIIMIIIII MIN 1111.111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111 EXHIBIT "C" * CATCH BASIN CAPACITY CHART A. Catch Basins in a sump condition: For catch basins in a sump condition, ie. , with water approaching from both sides of the catch basin, the following formula should be used: Q = 3 pd 1.5 Where - p = perimeter of the catch basin for MAG 534 (Single) , p = 4.44' ; for MAG 534 (Double) , p = 7.06' d = the ponded depth over the grate of the catch basin A few values for this formula are tabulated below. Type of d Catch Basin .3 .4 .5 .6 .67 MAG 534 (Single) 2.2 3.4 4.7 6.2 7.3 MAG 534 (Double) 3.5 5.4 7.5 9.8 11.6 B. Catch Basin on grade: The following values are to be used for catch basins on grade. The method used is found in the Arizona Department of Transportation manual from the hydrology seminar of December, 1968. Depth of Water Longitudinal Q Intercepted Q Intercepted in the Curb Slope of Street by MAG 534 (Sgl) by MAG 534 (Dbl) d = .5' .0010 3.3 5.5 .0020 3.9 6.5 .0030 4.5 7.6 .0040 4.9 8.1 .•. .0050 5.2 8.6 d = .4' .0010 2.4 4.0 .0020 2.9 4.8 .0030 3.4 5.7 .0040 3.7 6.1 .0050 3.9 6.4 d = .33 .0010 .9 1.5 .0020 1.1 1.8 .0030 1.3 - 2.2 .0040 1.5 2.6 .0050 1.6 2.7 * These charts apply only to MAC 534 (Single) and MAG 534 (Double) . Other catch basins may be used; calculations are to be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. EXHIBIT "D" PEAK FLOW FROM SUB AREAS . ' Subdivision Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i Tc i 10 4.4 25 2.8 33 2.35 41 2.0 49 1 .77 57 1 .60 65 1 .4 12 4.1 26 2.75 34 2.3 42 2.0 50 1 .75 58 1 .56 70 1 .35 14 3.8 27 2.7 35 2.25 43 1 .95 51 1 .72 59 1 .55 75 1 .25 16 3.6 28 2.65 36 2.2 44 1 .9 52 1 .7 60 1 .50 80 1 .20 18 3.4 29 2.6 37 2.2 45 1 .87 53 1 .69 61 1 .50 85 1 . 15 20 3.2 30 2. 55 38 2.15 46 1 .85 54 1 .68 62 1 . 50 90 1 .10 22 3.0 31 2.5 39 2. 1 47 1 .83 55 1 .65 63 1 .45 100 1 .00 24 2.9 32 2.4 40 2.05 48 1 .8 56 1 .63 64 1 .45 120 .85 NOTES: "i" is the intensity for a 10-year storm. 15 minutes maximum may be used for runoff from lots. Point Area C CA Length of Average Tc i Q No. Acres Area Velocity Min cfs r EXHIBIT "E" • 10 , !HI!hit pitoitl,giliirci!ii'i;-?r i.'1 . rr i!i: :i'i lii n11 iioi W ; 1 i . , (I(i!II, t•i (iill !ilillli,i 4i.: IT Itl'` „' ' • ;•�,. • �;.i. r I�II!I!hi ,l!Illill 1 VI!f !�Er0'4i' I. i. i'i '' !iI' Ilii Ili ai III!iIIIi IIIi�IIII I11 I�iI�IJYIIt(ill �1 BF 4 • II„I . II I'Illi !!lil' ' ' ill! i.1 .. ', 0.. rr ' - I11, li'; �u I,, ,; w 6 , ..: ' ..i,!Ili ill' t a. .: . ' �3 11 ,. I ' fill.1. 1 sz ♦ •1 t1•'t' Il•IIIIIIllfiflUl •.h '01!1! 'IL LL.� I• � > 1!114 Iliiii an/ giIIli�® . • :Two ►- I i! iii' iii, !rill i.Illi!!' it.' ii ;6 lift . iii`;I I iIf' ` 1. I , — 11 W„ ' I ls. iip Ilil 11' Q a, ,ii III !1;: f.. •iiil l • -'Ii 00 't•54-o i 'li :'� ' �d, .i ��« nf ll i `f : i1 ® r I Ii1, I .;IIi{Ili „IIl . . , .. .. i',- , tl1' 1 .. . , „„,,II ,. r I ,i'•t 1,if ' l Ii ,l.' , !I`'oog® �� to I H ,,, , t , l',11' Il E .T '.Ld!iI.I !l il(„i:1„1,, . I •..:it.t QQ t.06 '01- 5 �.. • ' � �r®1®®: ♦ •-Qr -;V,-•0 _allr _ /s .04 f it=,1'it '"III G4 t .3 "— ta c3 liPwilePillilli7A:..lp .. i r. iti.-;-----71f-.1 "1'.'----- .2 21;.::;;:.. •E-i:.•.-i;' •'' 3 P 4.ia - 't .3=:x=1.245 ."a na 1 .. o , _ I • S tal n am • W .i, "'i "uI(',:tt tat.. L F1. 'I{ + }s1 I 1:s ( .. .:.1.. tl: ~188 +.''/4_S 1J1c11,i 1 I I I 1 :.! 3 4 0 6 7 $ 6 '0 II 10 15 30 40 60 60 70 60 60 100 GUTTER FLOW = Q (C.F.S.) , NOTE: Use this chart for velocity estimations only. Enter the chart at 3 cfs. Figure the street capacity from individual cross- section of each street using n=.015 for paved streets. EXHIBIT "F" ON ).') T i t 13.0 i t-` . r 1 •AL • i t : , , t • c _ rJ.: ii I < . ! 1 i t 1 L -t. L ,.• - _-_":7N11,....,,, - - I_ .. .4 ---1---t--_---- - t , : ! : r r-,,_f _ eiN z _= ! .-F---fit. -- r - , 4 ;_L _- - - , i i E t- -'"r= - - A _~_ - t - -,+• �.. - 1 r-t-� -- . ; I _ t ♦ I �- -- II C 1.S — �� I- r s )q { �_ ___ i L ' ;-f-i r _ 1- --I----�--- -- - —• -{-- r- - 1.0 i- -4 --- ' r --- -- • r ( i . f "' .8 1 - - -4-.•• 4-- t--i i.S .6 --r - r - i'- t--_1--_ ;--- i-1_._ _. .4a -+1-11-1- 1ffinnilita U -1 = ,_ - _ .� .�_�- -� -- _ - +- - - , --_ — r t 0P.'r1, - ._ ice. —_ - _ -_ _- -►G-^ -t _ - • Mr. F -T----t- t-- i--- -1---F-1 --f-- ..... . ,.. . __...._, . , , I f 5 min. 10 20 30 40 60 WO ?JO 3)0 �:'0 1000 sir. 2 3 4 i 9 24 es DuratLJn Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Relationship for Apache Junction, AZ i EXHIBIT "G" AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING WITHIN CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 19 by and between the City of Apache Junction hereinafter called "City" AND owner of property located at hereinafter called the "OWNER" . City Right-of-Way is defined as that portion of a divided Roadway that separates the traveled roadway for traffic flowing in opposite directions and any other portion of the Right-of-Way lying outside of the traveled roadway, hereinafter called "RIGHT-OF-WAY" . In consideration of the mutual promises and convenants herein contained the parties agree as follows : (1) City will allow the owner to landscape the Right-of-Way (Give specific description and location) in the following manner : (Set out exact type of landscape) . (2) Owner will maintain the said landscaped Right-of-Way by (Set out type of work to be �.. done) and perform all other necessary mainte- nance. (3) The City Engineer shall determine whether the Right-of-Way is being maintained in a proper and satisfactory manner . If it is determined by the City that the Right-of-Way is being unsatisfactorily maintained, the City shall notify the owner by regular mail at his last known address of this fact . Owner will have fifteen (15) days from date of mailing in which to make provisions for the satisfactory com- pliance with this agreement . EXHIBIT "H-1" (4) If the owner fails to perform the provisions • of this agreement or if the assignees , conveyees, transferees , trustees, grantees, lessees , legatees , or devisees of the owner fail to perform the provisions of this agreement, the City shall per- form the required work and assess the cost against the property . A lien shall be recorded against the property for the amount of the assessment . (5) At the time the lien is recorded, the City shall have the option to continue to maintain the Right- of-Way in the manner described in this agreement or to remove the landscaping herein described and replace it with any other material the City decides is appropriate . (6) The lien will be removed and a release will be recorded when the owner or the succeeding assignees , conveyees , transferees , trustees, grantees, lessees , legatees , or devisees of the owner agree to perform the provisions of this agreement and post an appr- opriate bond . CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION By Director of Public Works ATTEST: City Clerk Owner Owner STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. County of ) On this the day of , 19 , before me, , the undersigned officer , personally appeared and satisfactorily proven to be the persons whose name are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same for the purpose therein contained . IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand and official seal . Notary Public My Commission Expires : EXHIBIT "H-2" URANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPi__ ✓EMENTS (IN LIEU OF CASH OR BOND) Assurance for construction of improvements within the designated right-of-way described as: For the purpose of providing the Assurance of Construction of Improvements within the corporate areas of the City of Apache Junction, herein referred to as Subdivider/Owner/Developer, and herein referred to as Financial Institution, licensed to do business in Arizona, represent as follows: 1. Financial Institution is committed to provide an irrevocable line of cre- dit or sufficient funds to the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, to cover the entire cost of installing improvements, consisting of, but not limited to: utilities, paving, curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, irrigation, including engineering and inspection costs, and the cost of replacement or repairs of any existing streets or improvements damaged by the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, in the course of construction. Said credit or funds are to be in the amount of: ($ ) , based upon a cost estimate submitted by the Subdivider/Owner/Developer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. All disbursements from said funds by Financial Institution to pay for said improvements shall be made to the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, or to a contractor or material supplier upon direction of the Subdivider/Owner/Developer, upon presentation of invoices and lien waivers. It is agreed that once construction had started, in the event the improvements in the above-described project are not completed, as evidenced either by a lack of work on the improvements for a period of sixty (60) days, or improvements as constructed are not acceptable to the City Engineer and not in compliance with City standards, and Am.- the developer refuses to make satisfactory corrections, then the City of Apache Junction may, upon certified letter to the said Financial Institution, draw upon the said line of credit, to the amount necessary to complete the improvements or make satisfactory corrections. This line of credit shall remain in force and effect until. (1) the improvements for said project have been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, as evidenced by letter; or (2) said line of credit has been exhausted by withdrawals by the said City. SUBDIVIDER/OWNER/DEVELOPER FINANCIAL INSTITUTION BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE: Approved by: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE EXHIBIT "I" ok ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0-/ es P/I) ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 1),, k/j/ //1 „../-N SECONDED BY: I YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON I COUNCILMAN DAMIANO J J MAYORCLARKE - /� COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH U COUNCILMAN SHANKS .COUNCILMAN HUDSON ii VICE. MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL 'ry ITEM NO, 5B BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT MADE A PUBLIC RECORD BY RESOLUTION NO , 82-35 AND ENTITLED APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, PROCEDURES FOR DEVELOPERS AND ENGINEERS IN PREPARING PLANS FOR REVIEW, WHICH MAY BE REFERRED TO AS THE "CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, " BE AND HEREBY IS, ADOPTED , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY MANAGER UPON RECOMMENDATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE, BE AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE ROUTINE REVISIONS TO THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DEVELOPMENT GUIDE IN ORDER THAT THE DOCUMENT IS CURRENT WITH POLICY AND PROCEDURES OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AND THAT MAJOR REVISIONS BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, Aft PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING USES 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY CLERK 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME , 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , /'1 PQp,CHt, o � Y,i�A a 9iFd1 7 P F t�•� /� A dot f. � 4PIZONP' Vihit o &4 pac/ce &2unction June 9 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. CITY MANAGER FROM. t } CITY CLERK SUBJECT. AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT - PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING USES In accordance with federal regulations regarding the use of federal revenue sharing funds , the city must conduct two public hearings on the proposed uses prior to final adoption of the budget . The first of these reauired hearings was held on May 4, 1982, in the City Council chambers at 5 : 00 p.m. A copy of the minutes of this meeting is attached for your review. The second required public hearing will be held at the regular Council meeting of June 15 , 1982, in conjunction with the tentative adoption of the proposed budget. The proposed uses for the city' s share of federal revenue sharing funds are outlined in the budget. The Council ' s tentative approval of the budget would, in fact, be an acceptance of the proposed uses for these funds . If you have any questions regarding this item, the city manager will be available to answer them. a--x-raf-4 Kathleen Connelly City Clerk kmc Approver for Agenda Dffe Item # First Reading ?Lad Second Reading ._.,. ..� ..t Public Hearing __. Old Busineu New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 „oak Amm. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PROPOSED USE HEARING May 4, 1982 5 00 p m Staff Present /m City Manager J. James Tuvell, Jr City Clerk Kathleen Connelly tt Finance Officer Rosemary Montgomery Councilman Marie Shanks Director of Public Works Rich Broman Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson Members of Public Present None City Manager Jim Tuvell opened the meeting at 5 10 p.m. and read as follows The office of Revenue Sharing has issued final regulations for the Revenue Sharing program of fiscal year 1982-83. According to Federal Regulation 51 13, it is required that each recipient government which expends entitlement funds, pursuant to each budget, have at least one public hearing on the possible uses of such funds. This hearing will provide the opportunity for all citizens of the City of Apache Junction to make written and/or oral comments and suggestions as to the possible uses of the entitlement funds. The City of Apache Junction's projected share of the FY 1982-83 Revenue Sharing funds is $134,512 The meeting is now open for public comments and suggestions. Councilman Shanks asked what uses are available. City Manager Jim Tuvell replied that the funds could be used for almost anything He added that at the tenative budget adoption hearing on June 15, 1982, the City Council would be provided with a breakdown of proposed uses and that this was an opportunity for the public to contribute their recommendations. Councilman Shanks recommended that the staff make the appropriate — recommendations. City Manager Tuvell asked for further comments. There being none, he closed the hearing at 5.15 p m ON es Tuvell 411" anager lir ATTEST- , Kathleen Connelly o City Clerk ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # / MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED MAYOR Cl ARKE COUNC I LMA!V DpM IANO __C.O_UNC ILr AN STEELSMIT COUNCTIMAN HUDSON V 7/ �COUNCTI P^AN SHANKS ,__COUNCILMAN,__COUNCILMANF IDSON VICE MAYOR - HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO, 6A BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PROPOSED USES OF THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , PUBLIC HEARING 1 . THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING AND RESOLUTION NO , 82-33, TENTATIVE BUDGET ADOPTION 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY MANAGER 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , P4ACHF✓G Off ,,,, 2^ 1 7`3 4-pC% U . �,f(1j Z '9R,zoNP `6ity o race unction June 10 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO• THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM. a CITY MANAGER SUBJECT. i TENTATIVE BUDGET ADOPTION The proposed budget for FY82/83 is attached for your review and approval . There are no major changes between this and the green preliminary copy you have been reviewing for several weeks . The budget will go to final printing following Council ' s tentative adoption. City Manager and Department Head narative messages will be added to the final bound copies , as well as some informational data, but the money portion of the proposed budget is complete as presented. This proposed budget includes the market adjustments and 3% cost of living increase as described in the green pre- liminary budget . JJT/ss Approver for Agenda ..! ate it.m .# First Reading Zoil.__!_5 " Sccon Reading r---- . Public Hearing -_.__tiOld Business ! _ New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 RESOLUTION NO 82-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83, HEREWITH SETTING FORTH THE TENTATIVE ESTIMATES OF THE MONIES NECESSARY FOR THE PUBLIC EXPENSES FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83, THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES, AND THE AMOUNTS COLLECTIBLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83, AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TAXPAYERS FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS- SECTION I In accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of Arizona, the statements and schedules herein contained are hereby adopted for the purpose as hereinafter set forth as the Tentative Budget for the City of Apache Junction for the Fiscal as Year 1982-83 SECTION II That the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized and directed to publish in the manner prescribed by law the estimates of expenditures, as hereinafter set forth, together with a notice that the City Council will meet for the purpose of final hearing of taxpayers and for the adoption of the 1982-83 Annual Budget for the City of Apache Junction on the 6th day of July, 1982, at the hour of 7.00 p m in the City Council Chambers, 1001 N. Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona. SECTION III Money from any fund may be used for any of these appro- priations, except money specifically restricted by state law or by City Ordinance or Resolution The transfer of any sums within any specific appropriation may be made upon the approval of the City Manager. SECTION IV The statements and schedules of the Tentative Budget are - hereinafter set forth in Exhibits A through F. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this _ day of 1982. Wendell J Clarke Mayor Resolution No. 82-33 Page 1 of 2 Ask OFIN ATTEST Kathleen Connelly 001114) City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM )\?.1.1)AI (17 a .. .:-. City Attorney 01114/1/ Resolution No 82-33 Page 2 of 2 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: L� SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V COUNCILMAN SHANKS MAYOR CLARKE f COUNCILMAN HUDSON! v COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR HILL \.11 COUNCILMAN EIDSON \/ UNANI" US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 6B BE IT RESOLVED BY MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-33, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FOR THE FISCAL 1982-83, HEREWITH SETTING FORTH THE TENTATIVE ESTIMATES OF THE MONIES NECESSARY FOR THE PUBLIC EXPENSES FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83, THE RECEIPTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83, THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES, AND THE AMOUNTS COLLECTIBLE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982-83; AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING TAXPAYERS FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED AND ADOPTED . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED RESOLUTION No . 82-07 eiN 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY MANAGER/PERSONNEL OFFICER 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , PQACHF � G2 , '‘ // ' ZONP `Oi 4R/ t y o C pac/ic 09unctzon February 23 , 1982 /11 elk MEMORANDUM TO. THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: l CITY MANAGER FROM: ACTING CITY CLERK SUBJECT. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 82-07 Proposed Resolution No . 82-07 , in essence, declares the Personnel Regulations of the city and the Personnel Policies and Procedures of the Department of Public Safety, as public documents on file in the office of the City Clerk. This proposed resolution does not adopt the two sets of rules and regulations. This step will be accomplished by Proposed Ordinance No . 139 , which is the next item in your packet . By adopting Proposed Resolution No . 82-07, the Council would declare these documents as the public record, making it possible for the City to save a considerable amount of ^ money by not having to publish the actual documents in a local newspaper. If you have any questions , please contact me. 67c-,4_ ,/a--&eiCcr-7-c-- Kathleen Conne lly Acting City Clerk kmc Approver for Agenda ��`� Date/ lt.m # ('i 5 First Reading Second Reading -.------- ✓ rubl+c Hearing Old Business New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 RESOLUTION NO 82-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC F RECORD THOSE CERTAIN DCCUIiENTS ON FILE WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PERSONNEL POLICIES AND POLICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT 1 Those certain documents entitled City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Personnel Policies and Police Policies and Procedures, City of Apache Junction, Arizona three (3) copies of each which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Apache Junction, Arizona, are hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk. 2. Thit certain document entitled City of Apache Junction, Arizona, Personnel Policies, contains forty-six (46) pages numbered 1 through 46, plus one (1) title page and one (1) page labeled "Table of Contents." 3. That certain document entitled Police Policies and Procedures, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, contains Chapter 1, Sections 1.00 - 1.05, Chapter 2, Sections 2 00 - 2 14, ( Chapter 2, Sections 3 00 - 3 33, Chapter ', Sections 4.00 - 4.32; Chanter 5, Sections 5 00 - 5 120, Chapter C, Sections 6 00 - 6 41, one (1) page of introduction and one (1) page of policy and procedure • PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1982 WENDELL J CLARKE Mayor ATTEST. L KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Jpit714k61 (Vit. ITEM I MEETING OF MOTION BY: OLOCOVA13 SECONDED BY: YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELS!`1ITH /ICE MAYOR HILL V COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"^. US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES PP )/ ITEM ## MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: l (Il'Vl YES NO ABSTA I NED CO UNT! MAN DAMIAN° COUNCILMAN FIDSON ✓ COUNCILMAN HUDSON 2.1AY0R CI ARKS I VIf.F MAYOR HILL V .-COUNCILMAN STEELSIIITH iNCTI MAN SHANKS �C-0_U , UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 7A BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 82-07, BE AND HEREBY IS REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 82-07, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC RECORD THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON FILE WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PERSONNEL POLICIES AND POLICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . PUBLIC HEARING 1. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE No . 139 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY MANAGER/PERSONNEL OFFICER 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , QACHE .•. P ✓G & - \ . , +0 h • , - Piz oN� it f 4 &47uche 2u nct ion February 24, 1982 — MEMORANDUM TO• THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. nr CITY MANAGER FROM. il ACTING CITY CLERK SUBJECT- PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 139 - ADOPTION OF PERSONNEL POLICIES Article 3-10 of the City Code adopts, by reference, the Personnel Policies for the city. It does not, however, include the Police Policies and Procedures under which the Department of Public Safety operates . Proposed Ordinance No . 139 will enable the Council to adopt the revised edition of the Personnel Policies as well as the regulations outlined in the Police Policies and Procedures , by reference . This ordinance contains the Emergency Clause which would make it effective immediately upon adoption. ..... - - /—&-, �-E� v Kathleen Connelly Acting City Clerk kmc Approver for Agenda , e- .._-._ Date/ Item # First Reading ��is,�� ._2b..._ Second Reading . . _. ..�.� . .✓Public Hearing ........ Old Business New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 /16. ORDINANCE NO. 139 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That Article 3-10 Personnel System, be amended to read as follows Article 3-10 Personnel System A. That certain document, entitled Personnel Policies, City of Apache Junction, three copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is hereby approved as per exhibit "A", adopted by the City Council and made a part hereof by reference. B. That certain document entitled Police Policies and Procedures, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, three copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, is hereby approved as per exhibit "B", adopted by the City Council and made a part hereof by Creference. SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. /1111k, SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV EMERGENCY CLAUSE It is necessary for the preservation of peace, health, and safety of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that this Ordinance become effective immediately, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon passage and adoption. Ordinance No 139 Page One of Two PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of ,1982. WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ;4k Cc ())/kJ\A-7\-1- City ttorney i i Ordinance No. 139 Page Two of Two J ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Vljr(In 0.41 Aiiiii\P ITEM # MEETING OF Ar()I\ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Sd YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN EIDSONi , I COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR HILL V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO f MAYOR CLARKE / COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH I UNAN I US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 7B BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO, 139, BE AND HEREBY IS REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. A� ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 61j ) \)r/ ITEM I/ MEETING OF J )9 MOTION BY: C SECONDED BY: , YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL /U _ V COUNCILMAN, STEELSMITH rl HUDSON COUNCILMAN _ f COUNCILMAN EIDSON FYOR CLARKE OUNCILMAN DAMIANO _COIINCII MAN SHANKS UNANITOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM ft MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES 111111NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO I/ MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUN!C I LMAN HUDSON VICE MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 7B CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 139 FOR THE FIRST READING WITHOUT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE. FIRST READING (WITHOUT EMERGENCY CLAUSE) ITEM NO . 7B Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO . 139, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 139 BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE . Stems 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 139, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED, FOR APPROVAL (FIRST READING WITH EMERGENCY CLAUSE ) ITEM NO , 7B Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, -THAT THE READING OF ORDINANCE NO, 139, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO . 139, BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE, Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO, 139, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 3-10 PERSONNEL SYSTEM; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED , FOR DENIAL PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR RESOLUTION NOS . 82-26, & 82-32 THE APPLICANT IS WHITE/MCMILLAN 2, WOULD THE PLANNING DIRECTOR PLEASE BRIEF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PUBLIC TO THIS PETITION , 3, IF THE APPLICANT OR SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION IS PRESENT, WOULD THEY PLEASE PRESENT INFORMATION THEY HAVE REGARDING THIS PETITION AT THIS TIME , 4 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 5 , IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THE PETITION? (RECOGNIZE ONE AT A TIME) 6 , CALL UPON THE PLANNING DIRECTOR FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS , 7, ANY REBUTTAL CIF CONTROVERSY - OR NEED - CHAIRMAN' S JUDGEMENT) A. APPLICANT B . IN FAVOR C . OPPOSED ...... ......, r81 ,CHF ✓i) G4,, t z :_ 1/PiZO IP, c0 ity o . Lip ache unction , Approver for Agenda ._ //Offs (�Itsm First Reading Ck. .)1 c�,9' _ June 8, 1982 Second Reading .... ...-._ ,,.,__.�/► .!"--Public Hearing _-..__ Old Business i. -... New Business -., MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL "'-�'`' ' THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: `y`) JOE GERO for PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - RESOLUTIONS 82-26 & 82-32 WHITE/McMILLAN STREET ABANDONMENT REQUEST Background: Applicants William McMillan and Alexander White are purchasing Lots 32, 33, 34, and 36, representing approximately twenty acres. These lots were rezoned Trailer Homesite (Penal County rezoning case 181) years ago. Applicants have expressed a desire to develop a mobile or RV park. In order to have the property together, they are re- questing the abandonment of Cedar between Greasewood and Superstition Boulevard, and Greasewood between Warner and Cedar. To facilitate their development, they are requesting Greasewood between Meridian and Cedar be abandoned. Applicants were not joined in application ''` by the property owners north of Greasewood between Meridian and Cedar; both have stated objection to that portion of Greasewood south of their properties being abandoned. The property owner at Cedar and Superstition did request abandonment. Applicants White and McMillan are agreeing to deed to the city, subject to abandonment approval , any right-of-way as per city minimum standards that would be located on their property. There are two optional resolutions for your consideration: Resolution 82-26 includes all of the area under applicants ' request, including Greasewood from Meridian to Warner. Resolution 82-32 eliminates that portion of Greasewood from Meridian to Cedar which is protested. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - RESOLUTIONS 82-26 AND 82-32 PAGE TWO With regard to the proposal , the City Council : 1. Is requested to not recommend abandonment of one-half of a street. 2. May decide to abandon one portion and not all that has been applied 40. for. This consideration will not affect utility easements. The utility companies have expressed no objection to the request. DCC Recommendation: The DCC has no objection to the proposed abandonment, subject to consideration of the desires of property owners north of Greasewood between Meridian and Cedar and subject to the dedication of rights- of-way by Messers. White and McMillan. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Commission, during regular session, passed the following motion by a unanimous (6-0) vote: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in abandonment case AB-82-1 that proposed Resolution 82-32 be recommended for approval to the City Council . " JWG:rlb xc: file RESOLUTION NO 82-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON WEST GREASEWOOD STREET AND NORTH CEDAR DRIVE IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ,.'k WHEREAS, Roger and Joyce Gupton and John Hirambasic have made application for the abandonment of a federally patented easement on the property described in this resolution, and WHEREAS, the requested abandonment is an easement for public right-of-way purposes described as follows Parcel No 1 The west 33 feet of Lot 36 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the south 50 feet thereof. Parcel No 2 The west 33 feet of Lot 33 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, AND the north 33 feet of Lot 33 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the east 33 feet thereof. Parcel No 3 The east 33 feet of Lot 34 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, AND the north 33 feet of Lot 34 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; EXCEPT the west 50 feet thereof Parcel No 4 A portion of the south 33 feet of Lot 32 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows Beginning at a point on the south line of said lot being 33 feet west of the southeast corner; Thence south 89°59'21" west, 627 32 feet to the southwest corner of said lot; Thence north 00°01'08" east, 2.99 feet along the west line of said lot, Thence along a curve to the left 78.57 feet, said curve having a radius of 50 00 feet, central angle of 90°01'46" and long chord bearing north 64°52'51" east, 70.73 feet, 40111. RESOLUTION NO 82-26 Page Two Thence north 89°59'21" east, 563 28 feet; Thence south 00°00'46" west, 33 00 feet along the west right-of-way line of North Warner Drive to the true point of beginning ems Parcel No 5. The east 33 feet of Lot 35 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the south 50 feet thereof Parcel No 6 A portion of the south 33 feet of Lot 31 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows Beginning at a point on the south line of said lot being 50 feet east of the southwest corner of said lot, Thence north 00°04'31" east, 33 00 feet, = Thence north 89°59'19" east, 557.56 feet, Thence north 00°01'08" east, 17 02 feet, Thence along a curve to the left 61 19 feet, said curve Ir having a radius of 50 00 feet, central angle of 70°07'24" and long chord bearing south 35°02'33" east, 57 45 feet to a point on the east line of the said lot, Thence south 00°01'08" west, 2 99 feet along said east line to the southeast corner of said lot, Thence south 89°59'19' west, 590 59 feet along the south line of said lot to the true point of beginning WHEREAS, the abandonment requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, finds that the said federally patented easements for public right-of-way purposes as described herein are classified as local streets on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan, and are no longer necessary for public use as a roadway, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above-described federally patented easement reserved for public right-of-way purposes is hereby abandoned and extinguished as a present and future right-of-way I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the abandonment of the public right-of-way has no effect on reservations for public utility easements Amok RESOLUTION NO. 82-26 Page Three PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 1 AB-82-1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-26 i I� i IU m IZ ,1.W Muulingbird St I To Be Dedicated I m W. Greasewood St I /74 7 33 33 F-33' o 4s-To Be Dedicated - 1 L �. L / 3 nz // To Be Z /I o Dedicated i 11 W. Superstition Blvd 0 7 / /// INDICATES AREA PROPOSED FOR I ABANDONMENT SCALE I 0 300 603 FEET N RESOLUTION NO. 82-32 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON WEST GREASEWOOD STREET AND NORTH CEDAR DRIVE IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED Amok AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHEREAS, Roger and Joyce Gupton and John Hirambasic have made application for the abandonment of a federally patented easement on the property described in this resolution, and WHEREAS, the requested abandonment is an easement for public right- of-way purposes described as follows Parcel No 1 The west 33 feet of Lot 36 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the south 50 feet thereof Parcel No 2 A portion of the west 33 feet of Lot 33 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 33, Thence North 00°01'08" East, 280 05 feet along the west line of said Lot 33, Thence along a curve to the left 36 05 feet, said curve having a radius of 50 00 feet, central angle of 41°18'28" and long chord bearing North 69°21'42" East, 35.27 feet, Thence South 00°01'08" West, 292 48 feet, Thence South 89°59'40" West, 33.00 feet along the south line of said Lot 33 to the true point of beginning Parcel No 3 A portion of the north 33 feet of Lot 33 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 33, Thence South 89°59'21" West, 33 00 feet along the north line of said Lot 33 to the true point of beginning, Thence South 00°00'46" West, 33 00 feet, ( Thence South 89°59'21" West, 589 74 feet, Thence along a curve to the left 36.04 feet, said curve having a radius of 50 00 feet, central angle of 41°18'13" and long chord bearing North 20°38'32" East, 35 27 feet, Thence North 89°59'21" East, 577 31 feet along the north line of said Lot 33 to the true point of beginning row. amok RESOLUTION 82-32 PAGE TWO Parcel No. 4 A portion of the east 33 feet of Lot 34 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 34, Thence South 89°59'38" West, 33 00 feet along the south line of said Lot 34, Thence North 00°01'08" East, 291 56 feet; Thence along a curve to the right 5 95 feet, said curve having a radius of 50 00 feet, central angle of 06°49'18" and long chord bearing South 59°31'15" East, 5 95 feet, Thence along a curve to the left 29.56 feet, said curve having a radius of 50.00 feet, central angle of 33°52'15" and long chord bearing South 73°02'54" East, 29 13 feet, Thence South 00°01'08" West, 280 05 feet along the east line of said Lot 34 to the true point of beginning = Parcel No. 5 A portion of the south 33 feet of Lot 32 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows: tF Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 32; Thence South 89°59'21" West, 33 00 feet along the south line of said Lot 32 to the true point of beginning, Thence continuing along said south line, South 89°59'21" West, 577 31 feet; Thence along a curve to the left 29 56 feet, said curve having a radius of 50.00 feet, central angle of 33°52'18" and long chord bearing North 16°56'42" West, 29.13 feet; Thence along a curve to the right 5.95 feet, said curve having 1 a radius of 50 00 feet, central angle of 06°49'30" and long chord bearing North 30°28'11" West, 5 95 feet, Thence North 89°59'21" East, 588.83 feet; Thence South 00°00'46" West, 33.00 feet to the true point of beginning Parcel No 6 The east 33 feet of Lot 35 of Section 18, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT the south 50 feet thereof WHEREAS, the abandonment requested, if approved, would not leave a parcel in separate ownership without access to an established public roadway connecting such lands with another public roadway, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, RESOLUTION 82-32 PAGE THREE finds that the said federally patented easements for public right-of- way purposes as described herein are classified as local streets on the Apache Junction Street Classification Plan, and are no longer necessary for public use as a roadway, Amok NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the above-described federally patented easement reserved for public right-of-way purposes is hereby abandoned and extinguished as a present and future right-of-way. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the abandonment of the public right- of-way has no effect on reservations for public utility easements. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: L1:11AC.7Arli""Agf City Attorney AB-82-1 PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-32 q a � q q w � I E I I W. MOCKINGBIRD ST, Z I 1 I I To Be Dedicated I I W. GREASEWOOD ST. — — — — — — I I � I m z 1 I m _To Be Dedicated 33,—* r 33 33'—1 F To Be Dedicated � W. SUPERSTITION BLVD, WM/ INDICATES AREA PROPOSED FOR ABANDONMENT SCALE I i I N 0 300 600 FEET ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 2./3 r G ,(61/ ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: ,� SECONDED ECO�JDED BY: = 4)11 Y NO ABSTAINED MAYOR CLARKE COUNC I LMAN Dp.M IANO �f __Cfl11N�LLr"AN STEELSMITN COUNC T I MAN HUDSON COUNCTI M4N SI(ANKS -COUNCILMAN FTDSON VICE MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAV R OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ck ITEM NO , 8A BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-26, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ON WEST GREASEWOOD STREET AND NORTH CEDAR DRIVE IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. ITEM NO , 8B (RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-32, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OR-WAY PURPOSES ON WEST GREASEWOOD STREET AND NORTH CEDAR DRIVE IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . PUBLIC HEARING C 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN APPLICATION FOR A PERSON AND LOCATION TRANSFER OF A SERIES 9 LIQUOR LICENSE THE APPLICANT IS SAFEWAY STORES, INC . , STORE #253 2. IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME, 3, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, 06( !'VIkCH? \\\ ::c',,'P':1'0 Y4'1 tiY r,44._ • "lRIZONP its o ,- -Apache unction June 8 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE PERSON AND LOCATION TRANSFER, SAFEWAY STORES , INC . , ##253 In accordance with the procedures for processing applications for liquor licenses , notice was posted on the premises at 3003 West Apache Trail , Apache Junction, Arizona , on the 25th day of May, 1982 , by the City Clerk. The notice remained posted for twenty (20) days , during which time written arguments in favor of or in objection to the proposed license were to be filed with the City Clerk. As of this date , there have been no objections addressed to the City on this matter. Correspondence has been received from the Director of Public Safety and the Director of Public Works , a copy of which is attached. The next step in the procedure is for the Council to hold a �.� hearing on the application and make recommendation for approval or disapproval to the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control. ZW-1_42-1.c.-- ae...,,t44 Kathleen Connelly City Clerk Approver for Agenda 4_<' lye ^—+ � Do. Item # d. First Reading t .K CI Attachments Second Reading - =1� Public Hearing Old Business t---.. New Business - :%; 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHE✓ �. �. '2�h i IV'Y:LSFJt so DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY q,pIZONP `Oity o� C4acIie 09unction W E McDANIEL ,/\ June 2, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk FROM: Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Liqour License Person and Location Transfer, Safeway #253 Please be advised that the Department of Public Safety finds no reason why a liqour license should not be granted to Safeway Food Store represented by John P. Harquindeguy. asl 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 scO it# on &ache unction INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17 , 1982 TO: City Clerk THRU: FROM: Director of Public Works0111 SUBJECT: Liquor License Person and Location Transfer , Safeway #253 As ample parking will be provided , no objection is expressed to this application. RWB/cc 1:1P.C.HE ►_ 1 w mow'1, ,look z qP/ZONP city o� pace unction { May 17, 1982 NOTICE The attached application for a Series 9 Liquor License, Person and Location Transfer, by Safeway Stores , Inc . , ##253 , 3003 West Apache Trail , Apache Junction, was posted by the City Clerk on the 25th day of May , at 2 : 00 p.m. Any person who is a bona fide resident of the age of nineteen (19) years or more, residing , owning or leasing property within one-half (Z) mile radius from the proposed premises to be licensed may file written arguments in favor thereof , or objections thereto with the City Clerk at City Hall within twenty (20) days after the date of posting, No arguments for, nor objections against, shall be filed thereafter. A public hearing will be held Tuesday, June 15, 1982, at 0.44 the City Council Chambers , 1001 North Idaho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona, at 7: 00 p.m. , at which time any objections filed will be heard. Kathleen Connelly City Clerk lvc I I Attachments 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982.8002 FORM tA• STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL- I /WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 im\( '' PHOENIX,AZ 85007 '' 602/255-5141 APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENS4'A,13 .v d / Type or print with black ink �� �47 NOTE: PROCESSING OF MOST APPLICATIONS TAKES 60 DAYS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OFTEN RESULT IN A LONGER WAITING PERIOD THEREFORE YOU ARE _- CAUTIONEO REGARDING EXTENSIVE FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS,PLANS FOR A GRAND OPENING ETC. BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF THE ' LICENSE. ' SECTION 1 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A: ATTACH A XEROX COW Or CHECK. M.O.,ETC. O NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5,14,15 Reviewed by. 'ccepted bei 3 PERSON TRANSFER,Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 9 14 15 Current file Ragged. .J�r�0.' 3 LOCATION TRANSFER,Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 10 14 15 Copies made for posti O NEW AGENT FOR CORP OR CLUB,Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 11 14 15 Copies mailed for poi WY.,,11',I/('•�� O PROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT Complete Sections 2 3 4 5,12 14 15(fee not required) Copies for background by. I�P1�'!L�Y ;': ❑GOVERNMENT LICENSE Complete Sections 2,3,4,5 13,14 15 Comments: ,/� r+ 7t 101 SECTION 2. TYPE OF OWNERSHIP U 1/f, U "� R A O INDIVIDUAL,Complete Section 7 0 CLUB Complete Section ❑PARTNERSHIP,Complete S.cvon 7 0 GOVERNMENT CLAIM. T R a D 7 3 CORPORATION,Complete Section 8 0 OTHER explain. SECTION S. APPLICANT (An applicant'must complete this Section) 1 APPLICANT'S OR AGENT'S NAME Harquifldequy John P. (Agent) (Mart one name only-to eppasr on License) ,Last Name First Name Middle 2. CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP NAME, Safeway Stores t Incorporated Enter exact name es it appears on Articles of Inc or Partnership Agreement 3. BUSINESS NAME, Safeway d"rZ Enter exact name as it appears on the exterior of premises 4. BUSINESS ADDRESS: EIEe�'-re"'1tr- p t i 1 t 1 Itr ,4' n.-'�.e> ,34D- L4 A� / �Ai / ^. Do not use P 0 Box Number r -%% A CITY Apache ainction COUNTY Pinal , ' IP CODE: 6, mAIIING ADDRESS P.O. Box 680 CITY Phoenix STATE AZ ZIP CODE: 85001 111111OSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OF THE ABOVE CITY OR TOWN. X<ES 0 NO SECTION 4. INDICATE LICENSE SERIES:Check only one,use separate form for each license ' NEW LICENSE FEES Total Due if Filed. Total Due if Filed Person to Person Laeatla SERIES Nov 1 May 15 May 16 Oct 31 Transfer Fee Annual Renewal Trrslet O 1 DISTILLERS LICENSE ON STATE) 1,900,00 1,725.00 550.00 350.00 150.00 0 2 BREWERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1900.00 I 1 725.00 550.00 350.00 160.01 ❑3 VINTNERS LICENSE)IN STATE) 1,700.00 I 1,825.00 350.00 150.00 160.00 ❑4 WHOLESALER,ALL LIQUORS 1,1300.00 1,675.00 550.00 250.00 I50.0(1 ❑6 WHOLESALER,WINE AND BEER 1,650,00 1,600.00 250.00 100.00 150. -,.b 6 .• .....ON•SALE RETAILER,ALL LIQUORS 1 700.00 I 1,650.00 350.00 150.00 'ISO. Cl 7 ;1 �001-SALE RETAILER,WINE AND BEER 425.00 387 50 200.00 75.00 40,4440.00 O B ON-SALE RETAILER,BEER 275.00 I 282.50 100 I.. 25,00 O.% ..a 9 -•4OFP•SALE RETAILER,ALL LIQUORS 1 100.00 1 050.00 .�r 10 50.00 ' CI 10 ..'-'''OFF-SALE RETAILER,WINE AND BEER 400.00 375.00 I54.•t 50.00 CST 0 11 t OFF•SALE RETAILER,BEER 275.00 I 282.50 100.00 25.00 110.0 0 12 ,RAILROAD TRAIN LICENSE 1 775.00 1,682.50 500.00 225.00 160.0 0 13 -AIRLINE LICENSE t 775.00 1,662.50 500.00 225.00 150.1 .0 14 .-PRIVATE CLUB LICENSE 1 200.00 I 1 125.00 150.00 166. O 16 'HOTEL/MOTEL LICENSE,Complete Section 6 2,050.00 1,800.00 • 500.00 • I ❑16 4'RESTAURANT LICENSE,Complete Section 8 2,050.00 1 1,800.00 • 500.00 • 0 170 1 GOVERNMENT LICENSE 250.00 I 200.00 100.00 , • O 121 . - DISTILLERS LICENSE TOUT-OF STATE) 300.00 276.00 150.00 50.00 •R15I ❑IS BREWERS LICENSE(OUT OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 15 1, 19 •tIA VINTNERS LICENSE(OUT-OF-STATE) 300.00 I 275.00 150.00 50.00 1E 20 IMPORTER.EXPORTER OR RECTIFIER 300.00 I 275.00 150.00 50.00 If .•Not Permitted /6r,. ,ems �0 ri /. AM.- ,_,�11 'SECTION 5 QUESTIONS FOR ALL APPLICANTS 1 Do local zoning laws permit the sale of alcoholic beverages at the location you seek to license.'BYES ONO ' . 2, Distance to the nearest church. over 300 t Name/address of church. N/A 3. Distance to the o nearest school. over 300' Name/address of school N/A 4. Are you the CZOWNER OLESSEE ❑SUBLESSEE ❑PURCHASER of the premises 5. If the premises Is leased give name and address of lessor Address City Name State Zip 6. Whet date was lease/sublease signed. N/A Term of lease is years 7. Does the lease include provision to retransfer the liquor license back to the lessor at termination•OYES SdNO & Has a license or transfer of license,for the premises represented herein been denied by the State within the past sixty months DYES CHNO If yes,attach an explanation II 9. Who will manage this business: not determined at this time Amok Last Name First Name Middle Each manager,other than owner(s) must complete Form 134 120A,and submit an 'applicant' fingerprint card 10. Does any alcoholic beverage manufacturer,wholesaler or employee thereof have any interest in your business OYES $]NO 11 Is the premises licensed with a license other than the one for which you are applying.OYES f 1NO If so give license No. / / / / / / / licensee)exactly as it appears on License) Last Name First Name Middle 12. What is your Arizona State Sales Tax(Privilege)License No 7-009043 13 Do you understand that a portion of the fees,such as Application Fee($50.00)and Interim Permit Fee(if applicable)is not refundable (BYES ONO SECTION 6. FOR SERIES 15 OR 16 APPLICANTS• 1 Is there a valid Series 15 or 16 license currently Issued at the proposed location OYES 0 NO If so,enter licensee's name exactly as it appears on licen License No. / / / / / / Last Name First Name Middle NOTE. If the answer to question 1 above is 'yes' you may qualify for an Interim Permit to operate while your application is pending, consult Section 4-203.01, A.R.S., complete a Form 176 attach appropriate fee attach the current license,and submit with this application 2. What percentage of your gross sales represents the purchase of"meals'• % 3. How much of your floor space is designed for restaurant dining(so ft)• Seating capacity for dining purposes 4. Have you attached a copy of your menu that includes prices OYES ONO Ill not explain) SECTION 7. INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP OWNERS 1 Answer the following questions:(If applicants are married answer each question for both husband and wife) Percentage Owned Last Name First Name Middle by each person Residence Address City State Z Applicant(enter here and in section 3) - Partner(or Spouse) Partner Partner Attach additional sheet if necessary " EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND AN"APPLICANT' TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD 2. Is each person listed above a bona fide resident of Arizona OYES ONO 3. Is any person,other than the above,going to share in the profits/losses of the business.OYES ONO • SECTION 8. CORPORATION OR CLUB APPLICANTS: -- 1 Name of corporation or club.Safeway Stores, Incorporated (Enter exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc or Club Charter) • 2. Date incorporated or chartered March 26, 1926 State where Incorporated. Maryland -- - - - 3 Arizona Corporation Commission File No. F-003OO4-S Date authorized to do business in Arizona. 6 18 41 4. Is corporation or club nonprofit•OYES 1211140 If so,give I R S tax exempt No N/A 5. If a club,refer to Section 4.101 4 A.R.S.,and enter the subparagraph under which you are applying. NiA 6. List officers end directors Last Name First Name Middle Title Residence Address - City,State,Zi On file at State Liquor . Control Board Attach additional sheet if necessary 7 List stockholders owning 10%or more EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND SUBMIT AN"APPLICANT' TYPE FINGERPRINT CA9. Last Name First Name Middle Percentage owned Residence Address W r Clty/State/2il N/A rt� CD VI .P. If this corp is owned by another corp.,attach an ownership officer/director disclosure for the parent corporation Attach adl tataett as necessary • -4v N ' �h., f 1r A Amok SECTION 9. PERSON TO PERSON TRANSKR QUESTIONS TO BE COMPLETED BY CURRENT L ENSEE• 1 Current licensee* S cilA/cI0/l/ y-Y'N Es 7- Entity. OW NE"r • Exactly es It appears on license Last Name 'First Name Middle Etal,Apt,etc 2. Corporate name IVA If current license is in the name of a corporation enter exactly as it appears on license 3. Current business name ��C 15 v ha AA AY X e r Exactly as it appears on licen 4. Current business address. NN.A.)ySA/ R/' }( County. P142r L. Ei`actly as it appears on license City ! r/}G/ld ZIP CODE Q J-7-9-Yi/ 5. License Series. License Number 0/Lf/T/ )/ i Q///gDate of last renewal DD., .is, iv' 6. Have you complied with the Uniform Commercial Code concerning bulk sale transfers MYES ONO If not attach an explanation. 7 Have all creditors,lien holders interest holders etc been notified of this transfer YES ONO 8. Does the applicant intend to operate the business while this application is pending OYES I54NO If so complete Form 176 attach appropriate fee at current license and submit with this application(for Series 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 or 13 only) 9 To be completed by the CURRENT LICENSEE I HEREBY RELINQUISH MY RIGHTS TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LICENSE TO THE APPLICANT NAMED HEREIN AND HER�$Y DEPr AND SAY THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS S C,TION ARE TRUE,CORRECT AND CO LETE , \ STATE OF//� alt/ w Signature of current licensee Date signed COUNTY OF h./_L1/CCU(SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this '5 7 daygf t , 19� y Commission[x ues 1'g,1°fidtl , I6 ��/�/ My Commission expires onM C P . 1�4 re OT Y PUB[I SECTION 10. LOCATION TO LOCATION TRANSFER QUESTIONS (Does not apply to Series 15 16 or 17G) APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER A LOCATION TRANSFER UNTIL IT IS FINALLY APPROVED BY THE STATE 1 Current business address. Highway 84, P.O. Pox 6 County. Pinal Exactly as it appears on license City Picacho ZIP Code. 2 Current business name. Picacho Market Exactly as it appears on license 3. New business address SEC Apache Trail and Meridian County Pinal Also enter in Section 3 Do not use P 0 Box Number City Apache Junction ZIP Code { 4 New business name Safeway Also enter in Section 3 � - -- 5. License Series: 9 License Number 0/9/i/ ],/ 7/0/1/9 Date of last renewal 1228 81 6. What date do you plan to move. Date of planned opening. 9u 19 82 SECTION 11 APPOINTMENT OF NEW AGENT FOR CORPORATION OR CLUB LICENSE• , -_ 1 Current Agent's name. ( _ Exactly as it appears on license Last Name First Name t n Middle 2. New Agent's name. Also enter in Section 3 Last Name First Name _4 Middle 3 License Series License number / / / / / / / Date of last renewal 4 Does this transaction involve the sale of any portion of the corporate stock OYES ONO If so Complete Section 8 N 5. To be completed by a CORPORATE OFFICER I. HEREBY CONSENT TO THE AGENT APPOINTM: Printed Name of Corporate Officer NAMED HEREIN AND AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY ASSIGN A NEW AGENT IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH RESIGNATION DISCHARGE OF THIS AGENT. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE BACKGROUND REPORT SHOWS THAT I THE CORPORATION ANY OFFICER, DIRECTOR OR STOCKHOLDER HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, I .LIQL VIOLATION IN THE PAST YEAR I WILL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER THE LICENSE TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMEN LIOL LICENSES AND CONTROL AND HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO APPEAL SUCH ACTION STATE OF Signature of corporate/club officer COUNTY OF SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before tee this day of 19_ My Commission expires on• Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC SECTION 12. PROBATE OR WILL ASSIGNMENT OF AN EXISTING LICENSE(Does not apply to corporations). 1 Current licensee's name. (Exactly as it appears on license) Last Name First Name Middle 2. Assignee's name. (Also enter in Section 3) Last Name First Name Middle 3. Lcense Series: License number / / / / / / f Date of last renewal 4. Attach a certified copy of the wilt or probate distribution instrument that specifically distributes the liquor license to the assignee SECTION 13. GOVERNMENT LICENSE(for cities,towns,or counties only)' 1 Person to administer this license (Also enter in Section 3) Last Name — First Name Middle 2 Applicant: Attach respective governing body's authorization Name of City Town or County 3 Have you answered ALL questions in Section 3 including the location to be licensed OYES ONO 4 Do you understand that you can only serve alcoholic beverages for consumption on the licensed premises OYES ONO 5. Will a concessionaire be using this license OYES ONO II so attach the agreement and appropriate authorizations required by Section 4-205.03,A 6 Do you understand s separate license must be obtained for each premises from which alcoholic beverages are to be served ❑YES ❑NO A SECTION 14. DIAGRAM OF PREMISES(Di.Rem must bo on thi fens,blwprirNe not aos.pted)• 1, SHOW ONLY THE AREA TO BE COVERED BY THIS LICENSE INCLUDE ALL ENTRANCES/EXITS,DRIVE IN WINDOWS SERVICE WINDOWI LIQUOR STORAGE AREAS,AND DIMENSIONS OR SQUARE FOOTAGE FIGURES DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS,LIVING OUARIF$E.iTA w�. rrrrw f w..nrs 1... g-F 07 lJ * /D MOr`�ewt wa..e+T — w... :,.',AI• seem. aa..... a...e M. I.. SAGEwAY � PPRTMS�T �Tnt[ r+. E MAILKi 19Trf t s114Y1T r J `� h'x. i .e sr ...ear. I. I •cocas, `ttrpa9 It.1,1 .•e 2... ler' N .• —1-9--L) IR _-.... -..-... .-.--1ea..vi ♦ \1\ A fr..74. es' er.e /� 4--- w caws - I t �/ r G ii O E ,, �rr a t ARC L 2 T e. I 11- 0. '©, e fl a @; I , , ,i^t a e ®I ® © 0 e © '` niP 1 ©�tl 0i . }� I �... .,.. I I . F I CV 1 b \I . ,41 I I 1 i ,. • ✓1� ., / I I .� 11 1 c..� 1- ,, �""e.c .� ` LG !o �1 ��� �J L .. IA e...� ai *r ei•w �r� rrl sa I- / \ .... «� n it I I l:/ IJt—��r•.(1 wa(I I I / ® 1 0 ir1 11 /-4+_ ".o«.re 1*yoga. ��k II'IfPT 11 aril .I 11 V I II { I I ego I/ - • .W., , ii I'�-« r,ref.. .I I I Imo...«...,... J 'k11 ._. J �s:.,.e ,awe v . --- . - - Fearnl rf.T.t- finer.'ai Tee fen, ....we. .4. .ri am.„,_ __........n ( A eA . xi C TKAII. ( U S I00 ) / I 2. Do merit of any changer of boundaries,entrances,exits,or service windows prior to modifptbn•)YES ONO 3, The I •tp my area wh Icoholic beverages are to he sold served,consumed dispensed possessed or Stand tatue gy..�(j�L /J��-' • 6gr o appl a/ !/ SECTION 15. SIGNATURE BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS STATE OF ARIZONA ) .....-.. __-.- I St COUNTY OF P �/��1 I, )0611 1 11:Nkp -ry A4A AN1.t BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATF Printed Name of App I�cart(or Agent rp or ub) HEREBY DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE, UNDER PENALTY PERJURY THAT (1) I AM THE APPLICANT, (OR AGENT I APPLICANT IS A CORPORATION/CLUB) MAKING THE FOREGOING APPLICATION,(2)THAT SAID APPLICATION HAS BEEN READ ANI THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE, (3)THA THIS APPLICATION IS NOT BEING MADE TO DEFRAUD OR INJURE ANY CREDITOR TAXING AUTHORITY REGULATOR AUTHORITY, OR TRANSFEROR (4) THAT NO OTHER PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREIN, HAS Ai INTEREST IN THE SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WHICH THESE TATEMENT ARE MADE• (5) AND THAT NONE OF TH OWNERS, PARTNERS, OFFICERS DIRECTORS OR STOCKHOL L ED AVE BEEN NVICTED OF A FELONY IN TH PAST FIVE YEARS OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION IN THE PAST API: Signatur SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO be)r.me this day ,1912 t� +� Signature of NOT Y PUBLIC 6�is My Commleolon expires on X`ZZ—6 1— OD tit `-' c Zs p m 1 P. y 1'. 1 J .�. Sr.. ''• +`�orrwtaoa, —D.L.L.0 USE ONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 PHOENIX AZ 85007 602/255 5141• H APR 23 8 v 8 AH '81 • • QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER, PARTNER, STOCKHOLDER (10% OR MORE), AND MANAGER ALSO EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN "APPLICANT' TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD WHICII MAY BE OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT. Ha 1 Name. rgis nd uy John P. Date of birth 4 8 36 Last First Middle Month day year Safeway Stores, Incorporated Stockton Cal. 2 Business Name. Place of birth. r (As it appears in Section 3 of Form 1201 City State 3. Business address: SEC Apache Trail and Meridian Apache Junction Pinal ' (Do not use P O Box number) City County Zip.Code 4. Drivers license No. X•06070AZ Height. 6rlrr Weight. 210 Eye color 13iyt'1 +lair colorJ,BWn w State 6. Name of spouse. Olivia IsahPlle Harguindeguy Date of birth 12 1 41 First Middle Last Maiden - - -� 6 Of what state are you a bona fide resident Arizona If Arizona,date of residency. 1 26 76 7. Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed or Business (Give Street Address,City,State.and Zip Code) A DATES Safeway Stores, Incorporated Present Position or business engaged 1 26 76 to P.O. Box 680 in Controller present Phoenix, Arizona B DATES Position held or business engaged in 1 74 to immediately preceding above(Al 1 76 C DATES Position held or business engaged In immediately preceding above HI \. Attach additional sheet if naceasa y !. Indlcase where you have resided for the last five years. S. PROM TO RESIDENCE • Month ' -Year Month Year Street City State Zip Code 1 76 present :3020 E. Mission Lane Phoenix Az. 1 74 1976 Diamond Cal. Attach additional sheet if necessary 9. How many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto• N/A 10. Give Telephone Numbers for. 894-4148 971-3019 Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detained,cited,arrested indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor violations OYES ®N 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been fined,imprisoned had sentence suspended or placed on probation for - violation of any law or ordinance OYES ON 13 Have you ever had a business,professional or liquor license rejected,denied revoked suspended or fined in this or any other state OYES MN 14 Have you ever had an application for any business,professional or liquor license rejected or denied OYES INN IS. Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a judgment against you in any civil action, the subject of which involved fraud or misrepresentation of a liquor related matter• OYES QSN 16 If any answer to Questions 9 through 15 is"YES" attach a signed statement giving complete details 17 Are you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations BYES ❑N( 18. Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales(Privilege)Tax Account and your city permit fees(if applicable)current EYES ON( 19 Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of any proposed change of business name prior to making any such changes. AYES ❑N( i 20. Do you agree to post the permit or license if issued,In a conspicious place on the premises and within view of the general public• BYES ❑N( 21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine and beer supplies only from licensed Arizona wholesalers OYES ON( 22. Do you agree to keep all records invoices and other documents relating to the purchase,sale,or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a /_ period of two years and to have them easily accessible for examination (EYES ❑N( 23 Do you consent for the duration of the permit or license,if issued to the entrance inspection and search by any law enforcement • official without a warrant or other process of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of • the State Liquor Laws,Regulations,and Board Directives EYES ON( 24 Do you consent to an investigation of your background including all records of every kind and description including police record' -•.r ';� and to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control end - •- - any other individual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control. OYES ONC 25. If any answer to Questions 17 through 24 is 'NO',attach a signed statement giving the reasons for such answers, ..-._.., ....... .. 1I FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT. •• STATE OF Arizona ) k- ' ) ss COUNTY OF Maric pa ) . I, J CA-1 1 r •I y 1h_. ��ln���\l BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HEREB' Printe nna a of apnli an DEPOSE,SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PER RY,THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAKING THE FOREGOING QUESTIONNAIRI AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIt ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE 7 Si ure �7 SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN efore me this I6 day of ' .19 p Signet of NOTARY PUBLIC (I - My Commission expires on. a —� VVV J ;;." }mkt..; ' ,..•, • • Oimio M . oft /� ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 17 eS ( N (.,' ! \ _ ITEM # MEETING OF ) 143-1(\ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMM SHANKS V( 0m1 MAYOR CLARKE V/ COU"!CILrAN HUDSON J COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR HILL , COUNCILMAN EIDSON \1)/ UNANI!OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON AND LOCATION TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE TO SAFEWAY STORES, INC , , STORE #253, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL, FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO , 9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON AND LOCATION TRANSFER OF A SERIES 9 LIQUOR LICENSE, TO SAFEWAY STORES, INC , , #253, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR DENIAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL , FOR DENIAL PUBLIC HEARING C 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER .. OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE THE APPLICANT IS LA CASA DE TORO 2, IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT, THE APPLICANT MAY SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF AT THIS TIME, 3, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 4, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. • rPQACHF✓G 3 1" /NM '' y � -lJC1 rJ ♦ O b.a tom' 'IP/ZONP ` 'its 4 acLieunction May 27 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CITY CLERK FROM: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT - - APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE , LA CASA DE TORO At the regular Council meeting of April 6 , 1982, action on the Series 7 Liquor License application for La Casa De Toro was tabled until a future date. It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that this item be considered for action at this time. The Director of Public Safety will be available to answer any questions you may have on this matter. Clx-/aM- Kathleen�r�? ,,c_Connelly U City Clerk KC/lvc • Approver for Agenda.......:�.4..:___,,.. a/Dt it.re # F rst Read'ng �/! __ /.__ Second RP iding 6.0,6s9 .../.) ✓ Pub:'c Hearing Old Business ..—... New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 CHE '► ry ► s, �;;4'�„prat ,, C DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY U S�VY,' ,, 1;l ii, Z '9,Q/ZOtAP c6it y U ' &4acLLeunction W E McDANIEL .i► March 23, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk FROM: Department of Public Safety SUBJECT: Liquor License Person Transfer To Casa De Toro A background check was conducted on both Sheila Fassett and William Fassett with nothing of a derogatory nature being found. However, on March 21, 1982 at approximately 0215 hours, Mr. Fassett was cited by the Apache Junction Police Department for "allowing a person to consume spirituous liquor on the premises between the hours of one fifteen A.M. and six o'clock A.M." Mr. Fassett is either not knowledgeable of the liquor laws or is not concerned with adhering to them. The Department of Public Safety recommends that this incident be strongly considered by the Council in considering the person transfer of this liquor license. ES:gk • 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220*TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 File No . 304 . 09 it 04pache 2unction INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM DATE: March 29 , 1982 TO: City Clerk THRU: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Worksk SUBJECT: Liquor License , La Casa De Toro There is no objection expressed to this application. p RWB/cc FORMIIO REV ]lei -DLLC USE ONLY- STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 PHOENIX AZ 806 602/255 5141 APPLICArliN3'O1 S �LICENSE Type or print with black ink NOTE• PROCESSING OF MOST APPLICATIONS TAKES 60 DAYS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OFTEN RESULT IN A LONGER WAITING PERIOD THEREFORE YOU ARE CAUTIONED REGARDING EXTENSIVE FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS PLANS FOR A GRAND OPENING,ETC.,BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF THE LICENSE SECTION 1 THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A ATTACH X/fff���rQQQ OF CHECK M.o ETC ❑NEW LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5,14 15 Reviewed by c t y PERSON TRANSFER,Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 9 14 15 Current file flagged by LOCATION TRANSFER Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 10 14 15 Copies made for posting ❑NEW AGENT FOR CORP OR CLUB,Complete Sections 2 3 4,5 11 14 15 Copies mailed for po ' y: DS •." ❑PROBATE/WILL ASSIGNMENT,Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 12 14 15(fee not required) Copies for background b ❑GOVERNMENT LICENSE Complete Sections 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Comments• ) SECTIOF, / TYPE OF OWNERSHIP L� I I I 0 a REF DATA INDIVIDUAL Complete Section 7 ❑CLUB Complete Section 8 CLAIM a T R a T R DATE CODE AMT PARTNERSHIP Complete Section 7 0 GOVERNMENT ❑CORPORATION Complete Section 8 0 OTHER explain SECTIO®3 APPLICANT (All applicants must complete this Section) 1 APPLICANT'S OR AGENT'S NAME -EA95grr W1 u.11101 Ebu)hR b (Insert one name only-to appear on License) Last Name First Name Middle 2. CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP NAME 4:5-'' / �j Enter exact name as it appears on Articles of Inc or Partnership Agreement 3 BUSINESS NAME. ✓4 `-flvt1 de- TO' L �j Enter exact name as it appears on the exterior ofof premises V- d-7 4 BUSINESS ADDRESS. Z7 0 A- I C r`� �e„LC I RP,C"`' wT /74 g zza Do not use P O Box Number ;]J//` C C 5 CITY APPM-E J oK1 cnOL COUNTY nT]II) - /� ZIP CODE.np62 C 6. MAILING ADDRESS. 6s/l IFl• CITY PHI/ cJl"i/ STATE /7 ZIP CODE O6 Z 7 IS THEE BUSINESS LOCATED WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LIMITS OF THE ABOVE CITY OR TOWN 'YES 0 NO SECTION(n 7 INDICATE LICENSE SERIES-Check only one use separate form for each license elk.- NEW NEW LICENSE FEES Total Due if Filed Total Due if Filed Person to Person Locatio SERIES Nov 1 May 15 i May 16 Oct 31 Transfer Fee Annual Renewal Transfer F ❑I DISTILLERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1900.00 ', 1 725.00 550.00 350.00 150.00 ❑2 BREWERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1,900.00 1,725.00 550.00 350.00 150.00 ❑3 VINTNERS LICENSE(IN STATE) 1 700.00 1,625.00 350.00 150.00 150.0C I ❑4 WHOLESALER ALL LIQUORS 1,800.00 l 1,675.00 550.00 250.00 150.0C ❑5 WHOLESALER WINE AND BEER 1,650.00 1600.00 250.00 100.00 150.0C • ❑6 ON-SALE RETAILER,ALL LIQUORS 1 700.00 I 1,650.00 0 150.00 150.0( X7 ON-SALE RETAILER WINE AND BEER 425.00 I 387 50 200.0 75.00 150.0( 0 8 ON SALE RETAILER,BEER 275.00 262.50 100.00 25.00 150.0( ❑9 OFF SALE RETAILER ALL LIQUORS 1,100.00 I 1050.00 150.00 50.00 150.0i ❑10 OFF SALE RETAILER,WINE AND BEER 400.00 ( 375.00 150.00 50.00 150.0( ❑11 OFF SALE RETAILER BEER 275.00 262.50 100.00 25.00 150.0, 0 12 RAILROAD TRAIN LICENSE 1 775.00 ( 1,662.50 500.00 225.00 150.0( ❑13 AIRLINE LICENSE 1 775.00 1662.50 500.00 225.00 150.0,. 0 14 PRIVATE CLUB LICENSE 1 200.00 ) 1125.00 • 150.00 150.0, ❑15 HOTEL/MOTEL LICENSE Complete Section 6 2,050.00 I 1,800.00 • 500.00 ❑16 RESTAURANT LICENSE Complete Section 6 2,050.00 ) 1,800.00 500.00 e ❑17G GOVERNMENT LICENSE 250.00 ( 200.00 • 100.00 • ❑171 DISTILLERS LICENSE(OUT OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 ❑ 18 BREWERS LICENSE(OUT-OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 ❑ 19 VINTNERS LICENSE(OUT OF STATE) 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 ❑20 IMPORTER EXPORTER OR RECTIFIER 300.00 275.00 150.00 50.00 150.0 'Not Permitted DLLC USE ONLY- . .. PI # - FEES i APP LIC FEE AGT CHG MFG CLUB TOTe SECTOOF( QUESTIONS FOR ALL APPLICANTS 1 Do local zoning laws permit the sale of alcoholicC ,b,e�vvye�"�ra�ges at the location you seek to license OYES ""'❑�N"OI" ,{, a� 4Z 2. Distance to the nearest church(�pfl)y ✓-7rl'�U.'w"i��ayre/address of church. 4dt�(.10:79P-115� C O-141.oL c•c�Ih�t.(LKL7t f5�� 144XC0G 3 Distance to the nearest school.ippf9`� 6 mttulame/address of school p€a.JZo €1614%•Sal. C.k a 1Co XA. AtS- A2 4 Are you the 11c OWNER, ❑LESSEE, ❑SUBLESSEE PURCHASER of the premises 5. If the premises Is leased,give name and address of lessor Al a' u L- Name Address City State Zip 6 What date was lease/sublease signed. )1a"/7 Term of lease is years 7 Does the lease Include provision to retransfer the liquor license back to the lessor at termination OYES ONO 8. Has a license or transfer of license for the premises represented herein been denied by the State within the past sixty months DYES ANO _ If yes attach an explanation r +� w1 9 Who will manage this business. l� Gf t (AnU { sit evam eb Last Name First Name Middle Each manager other than owner(s) must complete Form 134 Ind submit an"applicant fingerprint card 10 Does any alcoholic beverage manufacturer wholesaler,or employee thereof have any interest in your business OYES INNO / / 11 Is the premises licensed with a license other than the one for which you are applying*OYES I9NO If so give license No. / / / / licensee(exactly as it appears on License) Last Name l First Name Middle il 12 What is your Arizona State Sales Tax(Privilege)License No I I -01 1(4 6 .\ Do you understand that a portion of the fees such as Application Fee($50.001 and Interim Permit Fee(if applicable)is not refundable OYES ONO !' SECTION 6 FOR SERIES 150R 18 APPLICANTS. 1 Is there a valid Series 15 or 16 license currently issued at the proposed location OYES ❑NO If so enter licensee's name exactly as it appears on livens. License No / / / / / / / Last Name First Name Middle NOTE If the answer to question 1 above is 'yes you may qualify for an Interim Permit to operate while your application is pending consult Section 4-203.01 A.R.S. complete a Form 176 attach appropriate fee attach the current license and submit with this application 2- What percentage of your gross sales represents the purchase of 'meals" % 3 How much of your floor space is designed for restaurant dining'so ft) Seating capacity for dining purposes 4 Have you attached a copy of your menu that includes prices OYES ONO ill not explain) III SECTION 7 INDIVIDUAL OR PARTNERSHIP OWNERS 1 Answer the following questions (If applicants are married answer each question for both husband and wife) Percentage Owned Last Name First Name Middle by each person Residence Address City State Zip 4: r w1 I I i A,1, FDu'Ala iv '/d 1 ca r s 2,c. p J C6s2.20 Applicant(enter here and in section 3) Partner( r Spouse) �a�t �S�et to G;Ayi� �d°/a Ikt S 424(4. 2.A AZ XS ,Pe Partner Attach additional sheet if necessary EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND AN"APPLICANT'TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD 2 Is each person listed above a bona fide resident of Arizona.71YES ONO A 3. Is any person,other than the above,going to share in the profits/losses of the business OYES ANC) SECTION 8 CORPORATION OR CLUB APPLICANTS. 1 Name of corppration or club. (Enter exactly as it appears on Articles of Inc or Club Charter) 2. Date incorporated or chartered State where incorporated 3. Arizona Corporation Commission File No Date authorized to do business in Arizona r 1 .,, 4 Is corporation or club nonprofit OYES ONO If so give I R S tax exempt No 5. If a club,refer to Section 4 101 4 A.R.S. end enter the subparagraph under which you are applying 6. List officers and directors Last Name First Name Middle Title Residence Address City State Zii Attach additional sheet if necessary 7 List stockholders owning 10%or more' EACH PERSON LISTED MUST COMPLETE FORM 120A AND SUBMIT AN"APPLICANT"TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD Last Name First Name Middle Percentage owned Residence Address City/State/Zit If this corp is owned by another corp.,attach an ownership officer/director disclosure for the parent corporation Attach additional sheets as necessary I , SECTIONS/ PERSON TO PERSON TRANSFER /Q`U'E/STTIIONNSS TO BE COMPLETED yB}Y�CURRENT LI ENSEE 1 Current licensee. //4G E KI,.J LG(iV/GG Entity. Exactly as it appears on license Last Name First Name Middle Etat Agt.etc 2 Corporate name If current license is in the nameyf a corporation enter exactly as it appears on license 3. Current business name V AC16 KfVf zK�/J Exactly as it appears on licenseli " 4 Current business address. ZL.[J / 11C-1r County: PI l Exactly as it appears on Horse CC.��--�•�� City �A P, 4 4'AJMY' ZIP CODE. .SJos'a✓ 5. License Series, License Number. / / / / / / / Date of last renewal. 6. Have you complied with the Uniform Commercial Code concerning bulk sale transfers "OYES ONO if not attach an explanation 7 Have all creditors lien holders interest holders,etc been notified of this transfer DYES ONO Q Does the applicant intend to operate the business while this application is pending.){YES ONO If so complete Form 176 attach appropriate fee,attar - • current license and submit with this application(for Series 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 or 13 only) 9. To be completed by the CURRENT LICENSEE eill I HEREBY RELINQUISH MY RIGHTS TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LICENSE TO THE APPLICANT NAMED HEREIN AND HEREBY DEPOT AND SAY THAT THE STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS�IS SECTIONE A E TRUE CORK CT A O COMPLETE /AL yyI_M'� • d/�4 �„...d 2--1 ,T-����r/('., L -3 —�r� STATE OF nr�r i ature of current licensee Date signed COUNTY OF ( A Il SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of {/4(YZ�-- ��`' 19 ti . My Commission expires on js1�- i I/C.ti:f Signature of NbTARYUBLICI / It SECTION 10 LOCATION TO LOCATION TRANSFER QUESTIONS (Does not apply eves 15 16 or 17G) APPLICANTS CANNOT OPERATE UNDER OCA7sION TR NSFS TIL IT IS FINALLY APPROVED BY THE STATE T..�� __ //�� 1 Current business address. 5b t County. UA.GLX. ,1Exxaacttlyi it ap ears on h nse City y}T)(j[{1��1 • "x ZIP Code. S52�'0 1A� 2 Current business name. 1fCz 4SJV/tC�i16 aLo2./ 1 1 Exactly as' ppears on license SP 3 New enter in A.1va P. County A�7s,/s'•`wee , I Also enter in Section 3 D of use^'P^O Bod Number City A V` ZIP Code 4 New business name 0iLaft CC, "(1p 1 bro Also enter in Section 3 5. License Series: License Number 0 /7/r/////CV 1./`Date of last renewal 6 What date do you an to move. Date of planned opening FEE=5100 (Refer to Section 4 209 H ARS SECTION 11 APPOINTMENT OF NEW AGENT FOR/►CORPPORATION OR CLUB LICENSE for multiple agent change fees) 1 Current Agents name 1►r 1e��5 `�to res Exactly as it appears on license v L st Name ,_-Firs Name is 1 Middle 2 New Agent's name. .—ra i/dsl ►11 CfJ•C•711..•l.•i•R•.1�d Also enter in Section 3 Last Name First Name Middle 3 License Series. License number / / / / / 1 Date of last renewal 4 Does this transaction involve the sale of any portion of the corporate stock OYES NO If so Complete Section 8 5. To be completed by a CORPORATE OFFICER 1 HEREBY CONSENT TO THE AGENT APPOINTMEh Printed Name of Corporate Officer NAMED HEREIN AND AGREE TO IMMEDIATELY ASSIGN A NEW AGENT IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH RESIGNATION C DISCHARGE OF THIS AGENT I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE BACKGROUND REPORT SHOWS THAT I THE CORPORATION C eiN ANY OFFICER DIRECTOR OR STOCKHOLDER HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, OR A LIQUC VIOLATION IN THE PAST YEAR, I WILL IMMEDIATELY SURRENDER THE LICENSE TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUC I LICENSES AND CONTROL AND HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS TO APPEAL SUCH ACTION STATE OF Signature of corporate/club officer COUNTY OF SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this day of 19 My Commission expires on• Signature of NOTARY PUBLIC SECTION 12 PROBATE OR WILL ASSIGNMENT OF AN EXISTING LIC Does not a I r to eo r ' rNr^' �p y�A �ApoLationsl 1 Current licensees name FYI dC.(.(Jr j5 ,,,111��� (Exactly as it appears on license) st awe First Name Middle t1J�( 2 Assignee's name. J s (Also enter in Section 3) Last Name First Name Middle 3 License Series License number / / / / / / / Date of last renewal 4 Attach a cert'- opy of the will or probate distribution instrument that specifically distributes the liquor license to the assignee SECTION 13 GOVERNMENT LICENSE(for cities towns or counties only) 1 Person to administer this license. (Also enter in Section 3) Last Name First Name Middle 2 Applicant. Attach respective governing body's authorization Name of City Town or County 3 Have you answered ALL questions in Section 3 including the location to be licensed OYES ONO 4 Do you understand that you can only serve alcoholic beverages for consumption on the licensed premises OYES ONO 5. Will a concessionaire be using this license OYES ONO If so attach the agreement and appropriate authorizations required by Section 4 205.03,A.R 6 Do you understand a separate license must be obtained for each premises from which alcoholic beverages are to be served 0 YES 0 NO 'MN SON SECTION 14. DIAGRAM OF PREMISES(Diagram must be on this form,blueprints not accepted) - 1 SHOW ONLY THE AREA TO BE COVERED BY THIS LICENSE INCLUDE ALL ENTRANCES/EXITS DRIVE IN WINDOWS SERVICE WINDOW LIQUOR STORAGE AREAS AND DIMENSIONS OR SQUARE FOOTAGE FIGURES DO NOT INCLUDE PARKING LOTS,LIVING QOARTERS ET SERIES 15 AND SERIES 16 APPLICANTS MUST cXPLICITLY DEPICT KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND DINING FACILITIES (J 1 �1 �Q�Scil 10 �7 /�1 1 U C�9 c i ) . CAI Io ;o sti►azg.A_• 1. • � i ITd , -Oo/ _ / tliAK / ) C7/ I I& I,,V — A �; ' w 1 / / I _ 'I I 1 , e I G T _ • 2 Do you agree to notify the Department of any changes of boundaries entrances,exits,or service windows prior to modification.OYES ONO 3 T bove diagram is thrly.,area where alc holic beverages are to be sold,served consumed,dispensed possessed or stored Signature of applicant/agent SECTIO 15 SIGNATURE BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS STATE OF ARIZONA 1 ( ss COUNTY OF I I BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OAT Printed Name of Applicant (or Agent if Corp or Club) HEREBY DEPOSE SWEAR, AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT (1) I AM THE APPLICANT (OR AGENT APPLICANT IS A CORPORATION/CLUB) MAKING THE FOREGOING APPLICATION (21 THAT SAID APPLICATION HAS BEEN READ At THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE (3) TH THIS APPLICATION IS NOT BEING MADE TO DEFRAUD OR INJURE ANY CREDITOR, TAXING AUTHORITY REGULATOF AUTHORITY OR TRANSFEROR, (4) THAT NO OTHER PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION EXCEPT AS INDICATED HEREIN. HAS INTEREST IN THE SPIRITUOUS LIQUOR LICENSE FOR WHICH THESE STATEMENTS ARE MADE, (5) AND THAT NONE OF TI OWNERS PARTNERS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS OR STOCKHOLDERS LISTED HEREIN HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY IN Ti PAST FIVE YEARS OR A LIQUOR VIOLATION I HE„1AST Y ,.,/- (�( 1`l` Signature TT [ 4 ( /7SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me This l�� ay of C71 A.P_ .�,� " 193,( Signatur�of N TARN P BLIC � My Commission expires on b/.J`L / /1 S t.( - /I COON[asp —D L.L.C.USE ONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL, 1645 WESTJEFFERSON SUITE 227 L ,:!COP, DEP I PHOENIX,AZ 85007 602/2555141 M 7 AR II 10 FM 'BZ QUESTIONNAIRE LI J TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER, PARTNER, STOCKHOLDER (10% OR MORE), AND MANAGER ALSO, EACH PERSON COMP)ETING PHIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN 'APPLICANT TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD WHICII MAY BE OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT 1 Name: FASSETT SHEILA GAYLE Date of birth 6/7/48 Last First Middle Month day year 2 Business Name LA CASA DE TORO Place of birth. NORFOLK VA (As it appears in Section 3 of Form 1201 City State 3 Business address 2230 APACHE TRAIL, APACHE JUNCTION PINAL 85220 (Do not use P 0 Boo number) City County Zip Code „n 4 Drivers license No -0 P1-1-a V1 U A' Height. 5110" Weight 138 Eye color. Grn Hair color. Bid • 'State 5. Name of spouse WILLIAM EDWARD FASSETT Date of birth 4/Z53 First Middle Last Maiden 6 Of what state are you a bona fide resident Arizona If Arizona date of residency April 15th 8k 7 Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state Time Describe Position Employer s Neme or Name of Business Employed at Business Mine Street Address,City,State,and Zip Coda) A DATES Resturant and Self employeed, allfacets Present Position or business engaged Dart Pub of business. inLa Casa de Toro New Owner 2230 Apache Tr. Ap.Jct. AZ B DATES Freelance 85220 Position held or business engaged in Commercial Advertising Self immediately preceding above(A) 1966—Ores. Artist 1691 S. Apach.Dr.AJ AZ C DATES (curren. Position held or business engaged in 1974-pres. Wife and Mother immediately preceding above(8) Attach additional sheet if necessary 8 Indicate where you have resided for the last five years FROM • TO RESIDENCE Month Year Month Year CitygStreet State Zip Code jc 0 t g4 presto 1$R� 1 41014( 1� a61�C AIO 8KZ70 Attach additional sheet if necessary 1� �( �/(,,rG/� /,sl',, 9 How many hours per day will you personallype� llp�spendsp� managing the business related heretoer q i V 11645 5/A.d171 10 Give Telephone Numbers for Wilfeer& `�D�,4k� ��� / Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detained cited arrested indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor violations OYES cXN( 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been fined imprisoned had sentence suspended,or placed on probation for violation of a�law or ordinance DYES (XN( 13 Have you ever had a business professional or liquor license rejected denied revoked suspended or fined in this or any other state OYES N( 14 Have you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license rejected or denied DYES )(Ni 15 Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a judgment against you in any civil action the subject of which involved fraud or misrepresentation of a liquor related matter OYES FN( 16 If any answer to Questions 9 through 15 is 'YES attach a signed statement giving complete details 17 Ara you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations ,JYES ONO 18 Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales(Privilege)Tax Account and your city permit fees(if applicable)current ���ULLLLIYES ONO 19. Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of any proposed change of business name prior to making any such changes• IJ�YES ONO 20 Do you agree to post the permit or license if issued in a conspicious place on the premises and within view of the general public ,�y[`,YES ONO 21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine and beer supplies only fruits bcensed Arizona wholesalers WYES ONO 22 Do you agree to keep all records invoices and other documents miming to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a '��(\( period of two years and to have them easily accessibly for examination g1YES ❑NC 23 Do you consent for the duration of thy permit or licensr. d issued to the entrance inspection and search by any law enforcement //�� official without a warrant or other process of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of the State Liquor Laws Regulations and Boatel Direytrves IYES ❑NC 24 Do you consent to an investigation of your backgiound including all records of every kind and description including police records and to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have'against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and any other individual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control RYES ONO 25 If any answer to Questions 17 through 24 is 'NO' attach a signed statement giving the reasons for such answers //\\ FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT STATE OF 1 ss COUNTY OF BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HEREB` Printed name of applicant DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAKING THE FOREGOING QUESTIONNAIRE AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIf ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE Signature SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this day of i1 ic'-k.0 . ' . 19 Signature ofkJJlOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires on•i)ji--/ / fel.S FORM 120A —D L L C USE ONLY— STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL 1645 WEST JEFFERSON,SUITE 227 PHOENIX,AZ 85007 �, 602/255 5141 , 41 # °oit n AI?QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED BY EACH OWNER PARTNER STOCKHOLDER (10% OR //IO��,e8 MORE), AND MANAGER ALSO, EACH PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM MUST SUBMIT AN APPLICANT TYPE FINGERPRINT CARD, WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED AT ANY BONA FIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY READ CAREFULLY,THIS INSTRUMENT IS A SWORN DOCUMENT 1 Name. FASSETT WILLIAM EDWARD Date of birtf4/2J53 Last First Middle Month day year 2 Business Name LA CASA DE TORO Place of birth. PUMA ARIZONA (As it appears in Section 3 of Form 120) City State 3 Business address 2230 APACHE TRAIL, AAFrCHF JUNCTION PTNAL 855220 zty��.(D}o�no'tt use (/PQ0�/Box number) City County Zip Code 4 Drivers license No r dl(�DDD � Height 5 s 1Ots Weight. 165 Eye colw:BrOwn Hair color:Bro Wt' . State 5 Name of spouse SHEILA GAYLE FASSETT LYNN Date of birth 61748 First Middle Last Maiden Arizona January 8Q 6 Of whet state are you a bona fide resident If Arizona date of residency 7 Indicate your employment or business engaged in during the past five years If unemployed part of the time so state Time Describe Position Employer's Name or Name of Business Employed or Business (Give Street Address City State and Zip Code) A DATES Resturant and Self employeed, all facets Present Position or business engaged Dart Pub of business. inLa Casa de Toro New Owner 2230 Apache Tr. Ap.Jct. AZ B DATES 85220 Position held or business engaged in Jan.80-82 Student Mesa Community College immediately preceding above(A) r� , mesa AZ /'�/�� C DATES (eestdAki AU r+50..5 1 ae CWL4'OrnlLQ/ Position held or business engaged in Janis -go Ala � C7pTJV Qs/ ,) , immediately preceding above(B) t71....I� Yu ^-�^ . i AlOWIN Attach additional sheet if necessary 8 Indicate where you have resided for the last five years FROM TO RESIDENCE Month YearMonth � tr Year Streeet'.'���i City ���State Zip Code I Attach additional sheet if necessary,I/� / '/., 9 How many hours per day will you personally spend managing the business related hereto i4 40n lb[;/�4Q6ALU 5 a da j 10 Give Telephone Numbers for W'D� .--i Dd''DV Q I J Business Residence 11 Have you ever been detained cited arrested indicted or summoned into court for violations of any law or ordinance including traffic violations and liquor violations DYES YNC 12 Have you ever posted bond been ordered to deposit bail been fined imprisoned had sentence suspended or placed on probation for u1� violation of any law or ordinance DYES QJNC 13 Have you ever had a business professional or liquor license rejected denied revoked suspended or fined in this or any other state DYES y-4NC 14 Have you ever had an application for any business professional or liquor license rejected or denied OYES tL NC II 15 Has anyone ever filed suit or obtained a judgment against you in any civil action the subject of which involved fraud or ss!!�1'• misrepresentation of a liquor related matter DYES 41NC 18 If any answer to Questions 9 through 15 is"YES" attach a signed statement giving complete details y 17 Are you familiar with Arizona State Liquor Laws and Regulations )YES ONO 18. Do you agree to keep your Arizona State Sales(Privilege)Tax Account and your city permit fees(if applicable)current. ///I(IYES ONO 19 Do you agree to notify the Department of Liquor of any proposed change of business name prior to making any such changes OYES ONO 20 Do you agree to post the permit or license if issued,in a conspicious place on the premises and within view of the general public tyYES ONO 21 Do you agree to purchase all liquor wine and beer supplies only from licensed Arizona wholesalers AYES ONO 22 Do you agree to keep all records invoices and other documents relating to the purchase sale or delivery of alcoholic beverages for a dddd.s,,,,, period of two years and to have them easily accessible for extunination t�IYES ONO 23 Do you consent for the duration of the permit or license,if issued to the entrance inspection and search by any law enforcement Pr official without a warrantor other process of your licensed premises to determine whether you are complying with the provisions of the State Liquor Laws Regulations and Board Directives YES ONO 24 Do you consent to an investigation of your background including all records of every kind and description including police records end to waive any rights or causes of action that you may have against the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and sss���,,, any other individual or agency disclosing or releasing said information to the Department of Liquor Licenses and Control B1YES ONO 25. If any answer to Questions 17 through 24 is"NO attach a signed statement giving the reasons for such answers s\ FALSE OR INCOMPLETE ANSWERS COULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND THE DENIAL, OR SUBSEQUENT REVOCATION, OF A LICENSE OR PERMIT STATE OF ( ss COUNTY OF ,BEING FIRST DULY SWORN UPON OATH HEREB) Printed name of applicant DEPOSE SWEAR AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT I AM THE APPLICANT MAKING THE FOREGOING QUESTIONNAIRE AND THAT SAID QUESTIONNAIRE HAS BEEN READ AND THAT THE CONTENTS THEREOF AND ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN ARE TRUE CORRECT AND COMPLETE Signature SUBSCRIBED IN MY PRESENCE AND SWORN TO before me this " day o1 ,19 Cr.' Vi\ in /f3cr,._ Signature of I TARZ PUBLIC Y My Commission expires on l'ti/* ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES tc, ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAJ`! DAMIANO V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE U"IANI"^O S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO, 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE SUBMITTED BY LA CASA DE TORO, BE AND HEREBY IS, REMOVED FROM THE TABLE . ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 3,1,6 b- ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: -661(1 SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COMIC II MAN DWI ANO Col INC ILMAN EIDSON COHNC Il N'AN HUDSON \i/ MAYOR 0 ARKE HILL MAYOR 1F L I ._COUNCILMAN STFFI SMITH j zauN.CTI MAN SHANKS f UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE TO LA CASA DE TORO, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL, FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO . 10 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE APPLICATION FOR A PERSON TRANSFER OF A SERIES 7 LIQUOR LICENSE TO LA CASA DE TORO, BE AND HEREBY IS, RECOMMENDED FOR DISAPPROVAL TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL , FOR DISAPPROVAL e k PQ ACHE.dG fir i U i ,•.. gR,ioNP `f it/ o, C 4ache o9unction May 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: P JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER 4r FROM: . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BY JOE GERO SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM JUNE 1, 1982 PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING JUNE 13, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 144 Rezoning Case No. PZ-6-82 Rezoning Request GR General Rural to CR-4 Multiple Residence Zone Applicant: Matt Lang and Arthur Sullivan Jr. Power of Attorney Art Sullivan, Jr. Date of Application: April 9, 1982 Date of Advertisement: April 25, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: May 11, 1982 Area : 39,500 square feet Total Development Potential : 11 dwelling units Approver for Agenda _4- Appl i cation Requirements: _____________ ato Item # Number of Property Owners: 22 Firs!ReaL;ng f719a-9' s.3 . Number of Exempt Properties: 22 $=^c, dR-.1*.:7, 2 ...i._ Number of Affected Owners : 0 � - .- Number of Signatures: N/A . 1!� r'ubbc tioarmg Signatures by Affected Area. N/A . V 014 R;;;th;;,,; Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) : "`" `"S'''`Ss The DCC has no objection to this application. Quit claims for 22 feet for public right-of-way on Saguaro and Palo Verde should be required to make the roads minimum standard. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982.8002 REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM (PZ-6-82) May 13, 1982 Page Two Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: At the regular meeting on May 11, 1982, the Planning and Zoning Commission, after a public hearing, voted 5-2 to recommend to the City Council the following motion: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-6-82, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 144, application of Matt Lang and Arthur Sullivan, Jr. , for the property described as : the west 125 feet of Lots 12 and 13, Block 2, Newtown Subdivision, and the east 145 feet of Lot 12, Block 2, Newtown Subdivision, Pinal County, Arizona, requesting zone change from General Rural to CR-4 Multiple Residence Zone, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Stipulations are that the applicants quit-claim for rights- of -way purposes 21 feet on both Saguaro and Palo Verde Drives. The reasons for the recommendations are: 1. The area is already somewhat medium density. 2. Some multiple uses exist in the area. 3. Studies indicate the area will be medium density. " Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum.) JWG:rlb RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 144 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-6-82 , Application of Matt Lang and Arthur Sullivan, Jr. �► ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 144 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE. OPTIONAL CHOICES a 'Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference " b (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons ) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) ORDINANCE NO 144 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL 'oak The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as the west 125 feet of Lots 12 and 13, Block 2, Newtown Subdivision, located in Pinal County, Arizona, and the east 145 feet of Lot 12, Block 2, Newtown Subdivision, located in Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby are amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CR-4 Multiple Residence Zone SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY ( If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this Il ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM (11 City Attorney Ink /ink PZ-6-82 (LANG) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 144 REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR (GENERAL RURAL) TO CR-4 (MULTIPLE FAMILY) [ W > w Q is SUBJECT Q c SITED O � o W N Q U' c, // d S 27o'//7 --3 0 � Z 45" a- i yS' 0-- SCALE I I 0' 120' 240' Indicates Pinal County Tax Assessor's N Parcel Number From Map 101-02 CAPPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA JJ Cash Receipt No Ib7)2 Amount/a,- Date.331 use Number i^ / TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL. /ok I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as Follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed) Parcel 1 From• General Rural To. CR 4 Parcel 2 General Rural CR 4 Parcel 3 General Rural ( ;? 4 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application Cis as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) west 125' of lot 12 block 2 Newtown Sub Div Pinal County West 125' of Lot 13 block 2 Newtown Sub Div Pinal County cast 145 ' of lot 12 block 2 Newtown sub div Final County The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & eneral location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance rarest mapped street). 100 X 125 and 100 X 125' Number 415 and 435 N. Palo Verde Dr (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed.) 1. Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting? With Geheral Rural you have to get Varances before you can build anything of any size. The zoning itself was not meant to be for small size lots. 5'M A -L r1 ,,3 �-4.4 CAr Srr 1 2 Are there any known changes in land use, sreetIarrangement,Ior other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer. No 3. If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the community or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain There is a need for mpre small one BR apartments for elderly people,that are fairly new and do not cost an arm or a leg. 4 Other reasons for the subject request. 'rhe one lot is vacant 1 tried to rent it, but ran into all kinds of permits from the City. And it would be more valuable to us to build a 2 plex or 4 plex. Page 1 of 2 pages Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures We hope to build a 4 plex on the vacant lot and an addional thriplex on the other. 1 live next to the one with the small 1 BR house on .My parents just moved into it. Phese houses will have doors and bath rooms for whe(1l chairs if needed. Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit same in erson to Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note' The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) Arthur F Sullivan Jr 438 N. Saguaro Dr 982 4092 (Nue d of applicant or representative] (Address) (Phone) (Naive of applicant or representative (Address) (Phone) Arthur F Snllrvan,Jr 438 N. Saguaro Dr Apache Junction.AZ 85220 (Ndue & Address of person to whom petition & notices should be mailed) i .ci (� �c���! /'•(' 7 / ' :I: (Signature of applicant) (Date) -'Note Plans are required when application is filed for following. Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks Page 2 of 2 pages ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS I 1 VICE_MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE _ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH UNANI"^OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 14'L'i ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED i VICE MAYOR HILL I r ,COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH d COUNCILMAN HUDSON ki snit OILMAN EIDSON V i_ FY,OR CLARKE COUNCILMAN DAMIANO C�(INCII MAN SHANKS UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED I TOTAL ITEM NO. 11 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 144, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 144 FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 144, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, CHANING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED AND ADOPTED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : A . "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE . " B . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS . IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE , IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK . ) FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO, 11 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 144, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 144 FOR THE SECOND READING , .,tep 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 144, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-6-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, DISAPPROVED , FOR DISAPPROVAL PpACNF � O irk, s 4 ` � a �, V U stk-4= ��f '._- Z "IR,ZONP ` ity f �pucl�e cOunction May 24, 1982 Approver for Agenda.... Item # Firs+ Reading ,5. MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. �/' JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER ✓ t'.1btic Hearing FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION by 01d Business alj'" " JOE GERO, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY --- - New Business SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM JUNE 1, 1982 PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING JUNE 15, 1982 SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 130 Rezoning Case No. PZ-26-81 Rezoning Request: GR General Rural to CB-2/PD General Business Zone by Planned Development Applicant: James Bunnell Power of Attorney: John Granillo Date of Application: November 23, 1981 Date of Advertisement: December 27, 1981 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: January 12, 1982 and May 11, 1982 Area : ±5 Acres Application Requirements: Number of Property Owners. 4 Number of Exempt Properties : 0 Number of Affected Owners : 4 Number of Signatures : 3 or 75% Signatures by Affected Area: ±75% Development Coordinating Committee Comments: No objection to the rezoning, provided the following stipulations are met: 1. A corrected quit-claim deed be prepared dedicating fifty feet of Superstition Boulevard for public right-of-way and utility purposes. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM (PZ-26-81) May 24, 1982 Page Two 2. The agreements for landscape maintenance and streetlight improvement district should be finalized. 3. A sign plan should be deferred, but required as part of the final planned development consideration. 4. The rezoning shall be contingent upon approval of abandon- — ment case AB-82-3. 5. The applicant, as part of the final planned development consideration, shall consider how the flood zone "A" area will be provided for. Further, the first floor elevation of project buildings shall be designed with floodplain information considered. 6. The applicant shall provide a topography plan of the area as part of the final plan consideration. 7. All utilities shall be constructed underground. 8. All off-sites shall be constructed to city standards. 9. As a condition, consideration shall be given to the number and location of entrances/exits satisfactory to city staff and city standards and to state staff requirements and standards. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation. At the May 11, 1982, regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the following motion passed by a unanimous vote of 7-0: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-26-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 130, application of James Bunnell for the property described as: Parcel No. 1 The north 396 feet of the West 1 of the Northwest 4 of the Northeast of the Northwest a of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian; Parcel No. 2 The West 2 of the Northwest a of the Northeast 4 of the Northwest /, less the north 396 feet of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2/PD General Business zone by Planned Development, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Stipulation includes : (See nos. 1 through 9 above. ) Reasons for the recommendation are : REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM (PZ-26-81) May 24, 1982 Page Three 1. CB-2/PD is the highest and best use of the land being on state highway and section line road (arterial ) . 2. The proposal is in compliance with Section 33.09 of the zoning ordinance. " Recommended Motion: (See attached.) RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 130 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-26-81 , application of James Bunnell ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 130 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-26-81 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2/PD GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) ORDINANCE NO. 130 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-26-81 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2/PD GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE Aft, JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT. SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as the West 1 of the Northwest 1 of the Northeast * of the Northwest of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2/PD General Business Zone by Planned Development SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is li for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Amok Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City ttorney Id\ Anik PZ-26-81 (BUNMFI I ) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 130 REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR (GENERAL RURAL) TO CB-2/PD (GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) CB-2 GR • Spa . u.ers i ion v GR 0 GR SUBJECT v PROPERTY 26'IQjtr r 330" 39' c GR I CR-5 t U Z I I CR-5/PD in I I cn 1 . cenic 1 ' ' I I N 0 300 600 feet , APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Cash Receipt No Amount , Date Case Number PP2-2 6- a/ TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as fellows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed). Parcel 1 Fran. l F Nr7J91 12,.i2ML To. C 43-2 6Nr_=cR( E?c/S/.vz..SS Parcel 2 (' a-2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) 3AC PRRe/=/ / / 3W. ' OP CJ2 A/W NE NtA/ Y -e .2/ /-A/ /1'/-/9-ccd 1-');ttre L 2 W2 NW Ale it'lc' F7S N 39L/ ,Cfc. _2l The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance fran nearest mapped street). Svpek.,s 7 7io)✓ 33Z) f, s,NI? o f w tin NG�i c E' !/1," (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed.) 1. Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under #11.\ present zoning districting' C j' 2 Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted' Please explain "Yes" answer . . NO 3. If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the camunity or neighborhood, as the case may be' Explain. P 4 Other reasons for the subject request S r_`4 Page 1 of 2 pages �., Adak Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit sir in erson to• Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing hun to apply for this change of zoning) JcrFA/ T.6-r-!�n/ik2_ r?cr.i;rx �.js A j ifz /,c;4- 7 Y (Nduue of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Nam of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) /CN,v _> i'.aJit,� �� '. r . /i x 3.3 `a' '.Add ,.ie.T. /: 1� (Nam & Address of person to wham petition & notices should be mailed) (Signature of applicant) (hate) -',Note Plans are required when application is filed for following Special Use Permits under Section 2302; Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c. DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks Page 2 of 2 pages ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM II MEETING OF 1 71fi MOTION BY : SECONDED BY; \,\•1A° YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON �1 COUNCILMAN DAMIANO ( MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH II .COUNCILMAN SHANKS .COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE_ MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR ` OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0,(4/ 67 ITEM # MEET IN OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY YE NO ABSTAINED MAYOR Cl ARKE , COlNCILMAN DP.f1IANO f011NCILf AN STEELSMIT COUNCLLIIAN HUDSON __ C nt1MMC.T1 MAN SBANKS —COUNCILMAN EIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 12 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 130, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED . (NOTE• This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full .) ep 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 130 FOR THE SECOND READING , Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 130, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-26-81 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2/PD GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED AND ADOPTED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : A . "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARt HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. " B . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS . IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK . ) FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO , 12 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 130, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous , the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 130 FOR THE SECOND READING , -`*ep 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA THAT ORDINANCE NO , 130, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-26-81 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2/PD GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, DISAPPROVED, FOR DISAPPROVAL AC�E✓ .� �. PQ e4 G2 Ui� ' Y 4 ° Z AlPIZONP ` its o, ' &4pac/ie 02unction Am. May 25, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: \ CITY MANAGER � DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM• COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT FEES FOR ACTIVITY ROOM At the May 24, 1982 Regular Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the following motion was made and passed with a unanimous vote: Harvey Long made the motion "to recommend to the City Council a fee of $10 be charged for the Community Services Activity Room for social functions or at the discretion of the Community Services Department with no charge for regularly scheduled meetings held for business purposes with AlmIN fees to be placed in the Swimming Pool Account". Staff recommendation would reflect that of the Commission with the effective date being July 1, 1982. Your action on this request would be appreciated. Should further information be needed, please contact me. JEFF BELL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT Approver for Agende._.6--- . / ��.m - JB/ss First Reeding ��� �? —_ Second Reading C",C.l.2 __/•3 Public Hearing V.---old Business ? New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1 r ITEM II r nn MEETING OF �vV MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: Y S NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS MAYOR CLARKE COUMC I LrAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN EIDSON UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # - MEETING OF MOTION BY: 1401 SECONDED BY:YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS 1 � J COUNCILMMJ DAMIAN0 COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL j COUNCILMAN HUDSON U COUNCILMAN EIDSON v MAYOR CLARKE UNANITMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE ITEM PERTAINING TO A FEE FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY ROOM, BE AND HEREBY IS REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, TO CHARGE A $10 FEE FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY ROOM FOR SOCIAL FUNCTIONS WHEN DESIGNATED AS APPROPRIATE BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE FEES BE PLACED IN THE SWIMMING POOL FUND . ITEM NO , 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE ITEM PERTAINING TO A FEE FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY ROOM, BE AND HEREBY IS REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, TO CHARGE A $10 FEE FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY ROOM FOR SOCIAL FUNCTIONS WHEN DESIGNATED AS APPROPRIATE BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED , Amok ID. (rgiNCHE k � i�. 5 V 4 ij i. Z c gR,ZO‘41 COity a, A pache ,unction June 10 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM. °I CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ` APPROVAL OF CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT FOR FY82/83 The attached letter and contract contain the proposed agreement for legal services provided by Alexander, Hirsch and Saltsman to the City for FY82/83 . The fees represented here were arrived at by negotiation and mutual agreement . I believe them to be reasonable and fair to both parties , and recoinuiend their approval by the City Council . JJT/ss Approver for Agenda__!` e-- First Reading C`_l.•'ZI . •h .. Second Reading —, t-.., Public Hearing __ Old Business _ r< , New Business . , - : 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220.0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ems es L.AW (:rrIf5 At I XANDt R, SAI.Tc,MAN tKl ;, At At III il,141 It)4 AI't .tr,A WI DAVID F ALE%ANDER "'�- I )t' ,t 3(1 ARNOLD N HIRSCH Apr 1 t 20, 1982 ,64 9.3' on/0 RONALD G SALTSMAN Mr. Jim 1'uvell, City Manager, City of Apache Junction, em11) 1001 North Td•zho Road, Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 . Dear Mr. Tuvell In accordance with your request that our firm subriu t a pr: •'al for legal services to be rendered the City of . Junction, Arizona, for the fiscal year 1982-1983 , oe •,,h t the following propo Sal : The firm of Alex:indat , ILi rsch & Saltsman would perform legal services substantially in conformity with the torts •Ind conditions of the contract now in effect for the con- tractual sum o E $55, 500; however, we arc requesting the followLnq amendment be made to the present contract. (1 ) Attorneys shall provide, on a monthly basis, a summary of time expended on City business item- ized by department or other suitable classification For. those Ironths wncn time spent by the contracting attorneys exceeds eighty (80) hours, the attorneys will be compensated for any hours in excess cm eighty (80) hours at the rate of fifty dollars ($50 . 00) per hour, I am sure you ale aware that there is pending legislation being considered by the At:i ?ona State Lecjislature that mi Iht have a severe impact ou the City of Apache Junction court system as it pertains to the disposition of traffic cases involving driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor . I believe ,ou are also aware that there is currently under _ consideration by the Pinal County Attorney' s Office a case classification system whereby many cases that. have heretofore been treated as felonies would be filed in city courts as Class 1 misdemeanors. If one or both of these events occur, it will mean a substantial increase in the prosecution portion of our contractual obligation with the City of Apache Junction, and it is for that reason that we are requesting a. contingency provision 3 n our contract for such extraordinary circumstances Page 2 , April 20 , 1982 Mr. JLm Tuvell During fiscal year 1981 -1932 , three areas required substantially more time than 'ae had anticipated. One involved personnel liti- gation where former City employees filed causes of action or complaints against the City of Apache Junction. The second involved the question of the Police Department's participation in the United States Social Security System, and the third OIN involved the preparation oC a General Plan for the City of Apache Junction. However, none of these three areas had the impact that is possible under the pending "Drunk Driving Law Legislation" or the procedural cnange being considered by the County Attorney to file various classifications of felonies as misdemeanors in the City Magistrate Court. If you would care to meet with myself or Mr Hirsch concerning any of these mattez s , we will be available at ,our convenience. Sincerely, It"��..� , David r. Alexander DFA:wm OnS PROPOSED CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated this day of 19 , between the CITY of APACHE JUNCTION, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, hereinafter called the "CITY", and Arnold N. Hirsch and David Alexander, hereinafter called "ATTORNF WHEREAS, the City desires to employ Attorneys and Attorneys desire to accept employment from the City, and WHEREAS, the parties desire to record the arrangements made for such employment. THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED 1. Employment. City hereby retains and employs said Attorneys and associates, to act, under the title of City Attorneys, as attorneys for the City and to render to City and its duly authorized officers all legal advice and to represent the City and its duly authorized officers in all matters, including litigation, which may be pending or which may hereinafter be instituted in any Court of competent jurisdiction and before all administrative agencies and departments of the government brought by or against said City, during and throughout the continuance of this agreement; and to examine and approve contracts of said City, to undertake such collections as requested, to render legal opinions and all other legal services as City may require .amaik, 2. Acceptance Attorneys hereby accept the employment and promises and will render to the best of their abilities the services described herein during the continuance of this Agreement. 3. Term Subject to the provisions as hereinafter provided, the term of this Agreement shall commence on the 1st day of July, 1982, and shall terminate on the 30th day of June, 1983. 4 Compensation. For services rendered by the Attorneys under this Agreement, the City shall pay to Attorneys a fixed annual fee of $55,500 Dollars, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly payments, plus costs, payable on the last business day of each month, commencing July, 1982 oak 5 Costs and Expenses. In addition to the fixed annual fee described in paragraph 4 above, the City shall reimburse Attorneys for out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in the performance of Attorneys duties under the provisions of this Agreement Said expenses shall include, but not be limited to, long distance telephone charges, out of town travel expenses, investigative costs, expert witness fees, deposition charges, tran- script costs, brief costs, court costs, and photocopy charges All such expenses shall be paid by the City upon submission of receipted statements or billings therefor. 6 Extraordinary Expenses For those months when time spent by the contracting attorneys exceeds eighty (80) hours, the attorneys will be compensated for any hours in excess of eighty (80) hours at the rate of fifty dollars ($50 00) per hour 7. Duties. Attorneys are engaged to supply all legal services required by the City, its council, staff, boards and commissions in their official capacities Attorneys agree to faithfully represent the interests of the City as its general counsel for the period designated hereinabove, and to provide, furnish, and pay for all overhead expenses and personnel necessary to accomplish those ends Attorneys shall be available at all reasonable times to render the services required hereunder and a member of the firm shall attend the regular and special meetings A ,. of the City Council The meetings of staff, boards and commissions of the City shall be attended only upon the express direction of the City Manager 8 Working Facilities Attorneys shall furnish assistance of other attorneys and offices, legal secretaries and such other facilities and services suitable and adequate for the performance of their duties as set forth in this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor In performing the services herein specified, Attorneys are acting as independent contractors and shall perform their services in accordance with the standards, canons and practices approved by the State Bar of Arizona 10 Extent of Services Attorneys shall devote the necessary time, attention and energies to the duties herein specified, provided, however, that during the term of this Agreement, Attorney shall be allowed to engage in the private practice of law In the event -2- City enters into contracts or agreements with other attorneys with reference to specific matters (including but not limited to counsel for the Industrial Development Authority or matters involving conflict of interest requiring other counsel) , the Attorneys shall not be required to handle or assist in handling such matters and full compensation to such other attorneys will be made by theme City without reduction of the fees herein agreed to be paid to the Attorneys 11. Benefit This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Arnold N. Hirsch and David Alexander and their associates, and successors and assigns. In the event any member of Attorney's law firm should withdraw from the firm or be unable to act during the term hereof, the remaining member or members of the firm shall perform all services required hereunder and at Attorneys' option additional qualified attorneys may be added to the firm to perform said services 12. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Attorneys only upon good cause shown that Attorneys substantially had breached this Agreement by failing to properly perform the duties set forth herein. Attorneys may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to City. 13 Arbitration Any controversy or claim arising out of�� or relating to this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules then obtaining of the American Arbi- tration Association and judgement upon the award rendered may be entered in any Court having jurisdiction thereof. 14. Fees and Costs. If either party to this Agreement is required to enforce the provisions of any or all terms of this Agreement by arbitration or by employment of outside legal counsel, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party all costs and fees incurred herein 15 Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be sufficient if in writing and if sent by registered mail to the other party at the respective -3- offices listed below Arnold N. Hirsch City Manager David Alexander City of Apache Junction HIRSCH, ALEXANDER & SALTSMAN 1001 North Idaho Road P.O.Box 1237 Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Apache Junction, AZ 85220 16 Entire Agreement. This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties It may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, extension or discharge is sought IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement at Apache Junction, Arizona, the day and year first above written ARNOLD N. HIRSCH DAVID ALEXANDER HIRSCH, ALEXANDER & SALTSMAN CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION BY• BY BY J James Tuvell, Jr City Manager -4- ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM if MEETING OF MOTION BY: /)/C'6\ SECONDED BY YES NO ABSTAINED C.0111` ANO 1111111111111 Col INC I LMAN E I D ON . COIINC I . I ON SOB CI ARK JII1F MAYOR HILL .1111111111111111111111 ._COUNCILMAN lIT t0U ! .gin ; UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982-83 AS SUBMITTED BY THE FIRM OF HIRSCH, ALEXANDER AND SALTSMAN, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . ,rr 47 s + ...! Ve+ -i .I. t wxt- �R/ioNO' V itV o ' c pacIic Gih unction June 9, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO • HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: \ CITY MANAGER FROM• CITY CLERK SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT REQUEST - APPROVAL FOR JULY 4TH FIREWORKS DISPLAY The Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce will be sponsoring the July 4th festivities again this year at the Apache Junction High School grounds . Among the many events scheduled will be a fire works display. As required by the Arizona Revised Statutes § 36-1603 , the Chamber must make application to and receive approval from the governing body of the municipality (City Council) prior to holding the display. As indicated on the attached application, the Chamber has received authorization from the Fire Chief, Superintendent of Schools and the Director of Public Safety. If you have any questions regarding this matter, the Director of Public Safety will be available to answer them. X 1/'Tiliti6 thleen Connelly i City Clerk kmc Approver for Agenda f Die Item4 , G^ 1�Firs+Reading . (':..Ii. Second Reading _ --•; .. Pubic Hez 1'lg .., Jld BusinessV New Business f.:ge,�('7: 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 APPLICATION FOR FLREWORKS DISPLAY To: �I;-;_ COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Application is hereby made for the granting of a permit to July loth, 1982 conduct a supervised fireworks display on (Date) at A:,1LE JU::^,TION THIGH CCHOOL , A)aC`1C Junction, Az. (name of organization) Address ^ Applicant states that - K APACHE JUNCTION FIRE DEPARTMENT will be in charge of this display and responsible for the acts per- formed thereby; and , JIM GEIL states that he is a qualified and competent person to direct this display in such a manner that it will not be hazardous to property or endanger any person. etor of Display c ` erson in ch a of pz=» s-s� where display is loc, --d APPROVAL OF FIREWORKS DISPLAY BY SHERIFF I have investigated the premises described by the appli- cant and found them to be satisfactory and found him to be a com- petent operator. _ �1l/llln� SbJ5 ! Police cheif PERMIT FOR FIREWORKS' DISPLAY The application of the APA^?I J JU_s72ICE: C'rI^I2 T OP having been filed with the undersigned Board of Supervisors, pursuant to Section 36-1603, Arizona Revised Statutes, 1956, together with proper bond as provided by law and same having been approved by the Sheriff: Permission is herefore and hereby granted to A^ s' - - ^ , to conduct a fireworks display at ." "? , J?tT'TIOII (name of 117, ,••.•rnn- "nC c)1F' Ju ctilr. _ . AND IN organization) (address) THE EVENT OF POSTPONEMENT OF SAID SHOW, said display be given not later than one week from date specified above. DATED this L 3 day of Vei� , 19 ovio AGER ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF \ A 1 MOTION BY: t SECONDED BY: '\V 'Y'V YE NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON V/ .. COUNCILMAN SHANKS VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN DAMIANO J MAYOR CLARKE J _ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V UNAN !IOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 15 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE REQUEST BY THE APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO DISPLAY FIREWORKS AT THE APACHE JUNCTION HIGH SCHOOL ON JULY 4, 1982, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED . ;TT:",, ACHE✓ �.G O f t U 7 ? , '4 iv,?`Z ti t. yr< COity o &4pache 09unctzon June 7, 1982 MEMORANDUM To. Honorable Mayor and Council Through: City Manager From: Finance Officer Subject: Bids for Computer Hardware Additives On May 25, 1982, written bids submitted by two firms 1. International Business Machine (IBM) 2. Cass Marketing Services , Incorporated for COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES were opened by the City Clerk. After close evaluation, reference checks , consideration of price quotes and delivery dates; the City Manager and I recommend the firm CASS MARKETING SERVICES, INCORPORATED be awarded the bid. Bid comparisons and a list of references checks are attached for your perusal . Thank you. a-", Rosemary Montgomery /' Approver for Agenda___._/....... , Rate First Reading s)&.a ..',. Second Reading ..._.._._. Public Hearing _ . Old Business - New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 BID COMPARISONS AND REFERENCE CHECKS FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT CASS MARKETING SERVICES, INC. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE p PRICE DELIVERY DATE PRICE DELIVERY DATE Disc Upgrade (1) $ 6,667.50 June 30, 1982 $ 7,485.00 August 31 , 1982 27 to 64 Megabytes Display Stations (3) 9,397.50 June 30, 1982 9,000.00 July 31, 1982 Printer 5256-3 (1) 4,357.50 June 30, 1982 5,160.00 August 31, 1982 Printer 5224 (1) 9,187.50 July 31, 1982 7,349.00 December 31 , 1982 (includes sales tax) 1,421.00 (sales tax) $ 29,610.00 $ 30,415.00 Reference checks for Cass Marketing Services, Inc. : Systems Engineering Services Phoenix, Arizona Very satisfactory RGA Consulting Engineering Tucson, Arizona Very satisfactory J & K Computer Systems Mesa, Arizona Very satisfactory Strauchs Stationers Mesa, Arizona Very satisfactory Pinal County Florence, Arizona Excellent Norton Corp. Phoenix, Arizona Excellent Gila County - Globe, Arizona Excellent Age. . ACHE✓G� U ' gR1zOW's city 0 ache O2unction COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES Project No F-82-1 May 25 , 1982 Those Present . J. James Tuvell Jr , City Manager Kathleen M Connelly, City Clerk Rosemary Montgomery, Finance Officer Kam M Sansoni , Administrative Secretary On May 21, 1982 , the City Clerk' s office posted a Notice Inviting Bid Proposals for Computer Hardware Additives , Project No . F-82-1. Each bidder was asked to submit a written bid by 2 .00 P M. , May 25 , 1982 , indicating all specifications and total amount of bid. The bids opened and read by City Clerk, Kathleen Connelly, were as follows • Cass Marketing Services , Inc. Quantity 3 IBM 535 N. Brand Blvd. , Ste 301 Model 5251 Display Glendale, CA 91203 Station. $9 , 397 . 50 including delivery, and sales tax Quantity 1 IBM Model 5256 120 Character $4, 357 . 50 including delivery and sales tax Quantity 1 IBM Model 5224 240 Line or Comparable Printer $9 , 187 . 50 Including delivery and sales tax Quantity 1 Printronix 300 Line per minute Printer $11 ,447 . 10 including delivery and sales tax 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 t. �. r Computer Hardware Additives Bid Continued May 25 , 1982 Quantity 1 Disc Upgrade 27 to 64 Megabytes $6 , 667 . 50 Including Delivery and sales tax International Business S/34 upgrade ... Machines Corp 27 . 1MB to 64MB 4502 N Central Ave. $7 , 285 00 . Phoenix, AZ 85012 $200 . 00 transportation Display Stations (3) $8 , 838 00 $162 .00 transportation Printer 5256-3 $5 ,035 . 00 $125 . 00 transportation Printer 5224-2 $7 , 280 . 00 $69 . 00 transportation TOTAL $29 ,859 . 90 $556 . 00 transportation LIE-LL ,,,,_, 6.2.-x_ily4 athleen Connelly City Clerk WITNESS : { )' /r may,an -i`' .( a1neSuV . osemary ontgomery 47 ity Manager Finance Officer Kam Sansoni • Administrative Secretary ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM I/ MEETING OF MOTION BY: 11°Y\ SECONDED BY: (41-fl' JES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH J .. J COUNCILMAN HUDSON SIItCILMAN EIDSON i YOR -CLARKE v OUNCILMAN DAMIANOvc/ COUNCILMAN SHANKS , UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 16 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE �TY OF APA HE, JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PROPOSAL AS SUBMITTED BY �C��S V\_ca-v� IN THE AMOUNT OF $ � (1I0,0-0 , FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE ADDITIVES, BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED , . a I> . ACHE ✓o wti O U ,� iIZ�. Z qR/ZONP Vily 075 Lipache &unction '.... DATE : JUNE 7 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO : THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: CITY MANAGER iii2)FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING: FUEL TANK INSTALLATION A bid for the installation of fuel tanks was posted and published in accordance with City Code . By separate attachment , bidders will be listed for appropriate comparisions immediately following the bid opening , scheduled for June 14 , 1982 . Attached also are anticipated savings considering the .m. present way of purchasing fuel as compared to installing city facilities . //' Approver for Agenda ;„ First Reading 'h�5.1.K .17# Second Reading -. ..._,..,-,-" Public Hearing Old Business ____✓Wow Business RWB/sh 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQp,CHF ✓ 0� u.� g, t= G2 Q� 1 �y��.-�I 0 V . r,` Z r•�• ' 1 "IPIZOO' coif o pace unction June 7 , 1982 � MEMORANDUM TO : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ' FROM: OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR Ver.A.‘zs- SUBJECT: FUEL TANK OPTIONS Per your request, the following information is submitted: FUEL EST. YEARLY EST . COST AT LOTS OF 5000 LOTS OVER OR DEPT. TYPE CONSUMPTION SERVICE STA. $ . 085S PER AGAL 1VE 0oo0-SAEE . 25 PER GAL ENG. UNL . 200 248. 00 17. 00 25. 00 BLDG. UNL. 1700 2108. 00 144 . 50 212 . 50 PLAN UNL . 800 992. 00 68. 00 100. 00 ADMIN. UNL. 300 372 . 00 25. 50 37 . 50 COMM. UNL . 800 992 . 00 68 . 00 100. 00 P .W. REG. 6000 6960. 00 278. 00 540. 00 P. D. UNL . 32000 396. 00 2720 . 00 4000. 00 51352 . 00 3321 . 40 5015. 00 .•► PRO : Assured fuel supply (contigent upon allocation) Cost recovered by savings in 3 years or less CON: Up front capital expenditures Initial fill up of tanks capital expenditure $11 , 550 CONCLUSION : Assurance of having fuel available, especially for D. P. S . and Operations . It would justify capital outlay. Supplement that with the approximate 3 year recovery of investment, the installation of tanks appears to be more than justified. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / / 9 ITEM II MEETING OF MOTION BY: ItrYltrSECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON VI COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS _COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE. MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO. 17 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PROPOSAL AS SUBMITTED BY IZ. (�. G- i� . `c, IN THE AMOUNT OF $ v,c1l< .�3 , FOR FUEL TANK INSTALLATIONS, BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED. 0)ACHF✓ (Ok rig *z C��j• i x U C` "' 1i, 'lid'' ,0 z /) �R1zoP amity o &4 pac/ie cOunction June 9, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO. , HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF j THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH• r ,r CITY MANAGER FROM. i1 CITY CLERK SUBJECT. AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT - INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS As you are aware, each month the City invests its idle funds in a local depository which offers to pay the highest amount of interest on the total amount of funds offered for investment. In order for this to occur, the City Council is reauired, as per the Arizona Revised Statutes § 35-327 (G) , to annually adopt a resolution authorizing the city treasurer (city clerk) to invest these funds for any amount less than $100, 000 . 00 . Any amount exceeding this limit must be collateralized by the receiving depository prior to receiving the deposit. The amount of $100 , 000 . 00 or less is already insured under the federal banking laws . In view of the fact that the city is beginning a new fiscal year, it is appropriate for the Council to adopt the attached resolution at this time. If additional information is required, both the City Attorney and myself will be available to answer them. :/rerale.,2„) ay -X._42 el ' • Kathleen Connelly O City Clerk /� Approver for Agenda_.... 7' _,,•„ kmc Date tt.m # Firs+Reading 1`3/' r Second Reading _.._„ L=,,.,. •.:44::::Public Hearing __ Old Business ........ New Business, 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 oft. Ame. RESOLUTION NO. 82-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS OF LESS THAN $100,000 00 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO INVEST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Apache Junction is required by Title 35, Chapter 2, Article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, to adopt procedures for the deposit of City funds of less than $100,000 00, and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt annually a Resolution of continuing effect authorizing the Treasurer to invest funds collected for the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 35-327 (G), the Treasurer of the City of Apache Junction is authorized to invest funds of less than $100,000 00, collected for the City, as provided in the procedures of Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 35, Chapter 2, Article 2, as follows. 1 The City Treasurer shall award deposits to one or more financial institutions either within or without the corporate limits which offer the highest rate of interest commensurate with the safety of such deposit, 2. The City Treasurer shall give notice to each public de- pository within the corporate limits and, in his discretion, to any other public depository in the State of the amount of City funds available for deposit, the period of time such funds will be deposited 1l and the time bids will be opened, such notice shall be in writing unless the Treasurer determines that the amount of time necessary to prepare and transmit such notice in writing may result in a loss of interest earnings in which case notice shall be by telephone or other appropriate means, 3. At the time specified in the notice the Treasurer or his authorized representative shall open the written bids and announce the bids, 4. The City Treasurer shall award the bid to the public de- pository offering the highest rates of interest provided such interest rate is not less than One Hundred and Three Percent (103%) of the equivalent bond yield of the United States Treasury Bills of like terms; 5 If the depository offering the highest rate of interest has bid or is eligible for only a portion of the funds, the Treasurer shall award that portion to such depository and the remaining portion shall be awarded to the depository bidding the next highest rate of interest, 6. In the case of tie bids, the Treasurer shall award the enacted deposit to the financial institution with the lowest ratio of public deposits in relation to its capital structure, the public depository shall be responsible for submitting documentation of such ratio and the Treasurer shall have the right to rely on the accuracy of such documentation; 7 The Treasurer shall prepare a report of each award of enacted deposits specifying the public depositories notified, the rate of interest bid by each, and the depository or depositories to which the deposit was awarded and shall submit such report to the City Council at its next regular meeting. Resolution No 82-15 Page One of Two Ask Aa", 8 The Treasurer is authorized to invest in Treasury Bills or other United Stated Treasury Securities with a maturity date of twelve months or less if no bids are received at an interest rate no less than the equivalent bond yield of United States Treasury Bills like term computed from the asking price on the business date previous to the date bids are open; 9 The Treasurer shall keep in his possession for not less than two years all bids receeved, 10. The City Council reserves the right, through its Treasurer, to reject any and all bids PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 1982. WENDELL J. CLARKE Mayor ATTEST KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City ttorney i Resolution No. 82-15 Page Two of Two ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 3 ITEM # MEETING OF cl� MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : YES 'MAABSTAINED MAY• ' : : ► COUNCILMAN DP[1IANO J CaUNCI111 LSMIT , COUNCILMAN l r1AN HUDSON / 000NC11 MAN SHANKS v COUNCILMAN FTDSON VICE MAYOR HILL UNANI".OUS � IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM N0, 18 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 82-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF CITY FUNDS OF LESS THAN $100,000. 00 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TREASURER TO INVEST CITY FUNDS, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED . Air Agb. PeACHF f S ✓G ce4a„, o gRiZow- (Oily clf pache unction DATE: JUNE 7 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO : THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THRU: CITY MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY REGARDING A SPEED LIMIT FOR 16th AVENUE, FROM SAN MARCOS DRIVE TO IRONWOOD DRIVE As new speed limit signs are desired along the newly paved section of 16th Avenue, and as a speed limit has not been previously established by the City Council , it is requested that the speed limit in the referenced area be set at 35mph. Approver for Agenda -- -; .ti( Item # not Reading L JI.1 w„G.G...... Ut.2.-,0 Reading --........... „w,,:.,,u,.; MS / aainsis tt' 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 OIN RESOLUTION NO. 82-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON 16TH AVENUE, BETWEEN SAN MARCOS DRIVE AND IRONWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to insure safe, effective and efficient traffic flow along public rights-of-way within the city limits of Apache Junction, Arizona, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, that the speed limit shall be 35 m p h on 16th Avenue, from San Marcos Drive to Ironwood Drive. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works is empowered and directed to initiate appropriate action to install the speed limit signs on the referenced street PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1982, by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona l Wendell J. Clarke, Mayor ATTEST. Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. City Attorney ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEf1 # MEETING OF MOTION BY: 1/17 SECONDED BY: • ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILIM SHANKS MAYOR CLARKE arissmsmi COUNIC I LrAN HUDSON 1111111/111111 COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR HILL =rim COUNCILMAN EIDSON 1111111111111 UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 19 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-36, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON 16TH AVENUE, BETWEEN SAN MARCOS DRIVE AND IRONWOOD DRIVE, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. 7__Lz 46z,e, cD._ c97 cy-7 . Z F/ax2.2,,,y 2°7-27,y, K0.72.77/.55/ 6 zrz /4, 0/ iip 5k Cl-it. Am ik U 1 Z AI PIZONP `6'ity 4 .ill ache unction Amok June 10 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO• THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM. /ii � CITY MANAGERAPPROVAL OF PROPERTYCAUS YSUBJECT. , / ALT INSURANCE At the May 18th Council meeting, Fred S James Co. was appointed as the City' s broker of record for property, casualty and related insurance. The attached proposal from Fred S . James Co is presented for your review and action. This proposal represents more coverage at a lower total premium price compared to our previous policies . I have reviewed this proposal and recommend its approval p to the City Council . JJT/ss • Approver for Agenda_. _____ Date Item # First Reading ,5./.29 .-�. Second Reading ....... Puh!ic Hcaring Old Business L./New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 sok /eak J2rnEs FRED S JAMES&CO.OF ARIZONA 1414 West Broadway Road,P 0 Box 22300 Tempe,Arizona 85282 602 968-6270 Telex 165797 June 9, 1982 Mr. J. James Tuvell, Jr. City Manager City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ. 85220 RE: Insurance Program - FY 82/83 Replacement Program Dear Mr. Tuvell: We are pleased to provide you with our recommendation for the City's Replacement Insurance Program, effective July 1, 1982. The recommended program utilizes those insurance companies who specialize in Public Entity Business and, thus, are well aware of all the exposures generated by a city. The coverage is tailored to meet your specific needs and is broader in the number of areas. I have indicated some specific areas where replacement coverage is broader. We at James stand ready to implement the recommended program at your request. Thank you for selecting Fred. S. James & Company as your broker. If it is desirous, I would be more than happy to assist you in your presentation to the City Council regarding the recommended program. I will await your instructions. Best personal regards. Very truly yours, FRED. S. JAMES/041.14"16&le & COMPANY Robert J. Molinaro Vice President RJM/nlw Enclosures Insurance Brokers Since 1858 .., ,.. JamEs RECOMMENDED PROGRAM RECAP 1. Primary Liability - $1,000,000 $22,247.00 2. Excess Liability - $10,000,000 $ 3,825.00 3. Crime Coverages $ 962.00 4. Computer Policy $ 272.00 5. Property - $769,555 Blanket Limit w/$1,000 Ded. $ 3,463.00 6. User Use Fuel Bond $ 40.00 Total Annual Cost $30,809.00 The recommended program represents: - 400% Increase in Liability Limit - Broader Liability and Property Coverages - 33% Reduction in Insurance Premium Costs Islb. In Ilk LmEs PRIMARY LIABILITY Structuring of the recommended program utilizes a Manuscript Public Entity Policy which includes Automobile, General Liability, Personal Injury Liability, including Police and Errors or Omisssions coverage. This is provided all in one policy. The obvious benefit is that it is not uncommon for a Public Entity to sustain a loss under more than one coverage. For example, the City may be involved in a bodily injury loss through the operation of one of their vehicles and the negligent employee and the City may be sued under the auto portion as well as the errors and omissions. By having all coverages in the same policy, it reduces a potential "gap" in coverage that can exist where two or more insurance companies are called upon to defend different parts of a claim. Currently, the City's insurance is structured with one company providing General and Auto Liability, another providing Police Protection and a third providing Errors and Omissions. It is our contention that all these coverages should be combined in one policy. Coverage has been expanded to provide the following additional coverage: 1) All liability to be provided on an occurrence basis. This means that should a claim arise after the policy has expired, it will still be honored by the insurance company, regardless of when it is reported. Last year the City's insurance provided occurrence coverage for General Liability and Auto Liability, but not for the Police or Errors and Omissions coverage. Instead, Police and Errors and Omissions were provided under a "claims made" basis. This means that only claims that occur and are reported during the policy term will be honored. However, as long as the City continually purchases "claims made" coverage, there is no apparent danger that a claim would be denied. One area that could be of concern is where the covered insured retires or is no longer re-elected to the City Council and the new Council decides to terminate coverage. If a claim arises due to action from the former City Council member and claims made insurance has not been continually provided, that person would have no protection. Accordingly, the program includes occurrence coverage for all liability. 2) Flat Charge Premium/No Audits. The current policies are written on an audit basis, which means that at the end of the year should there be any increase or decrease in payroll, number of vehicles, number of employees, or other basis of rating, an additional or return premium would be generated. For example, the records indicate that for FY 81/82, you paid an additional $3,247.00 as a result of the 1980 policy year liability audit. The recommended program would enable the City to have a fixed cost for the year without worrying about adding additional JamEs vehicles, increasing payrolls or any other increases that would normally affect the premium basis. Conversely, should there be any decrease in operations that would generate a return premium, none would be forthcoming. However, the general tendency of the Public Entities today is for an increase in operations, rather than a curtailment. We feel that this addition to the City's insurance program is a definite advantage. 3) Under the Personal Injury definition, beside the normal exposures of liable, slander, false arrest, the definition is extended to include assault and battery, and discrimination. 4) Most expanded General Liability Policies include coverage for liability assumed under written contract. The recommended program also includes coverage for oral contracts. 5) Errors and Omissions not only covers elected and appointed officials, but all employees of the City, including Public Works, Architects, City Attorneys and Engineers. However, this coverage does not extend to third party contractors. 6) The intent of the policy is to cover all employees and those acting on behalf of the City. It is our feeling that this is a very broad expansion of coverage. 7) While the City does not provide any fire or paramedic service at this time, it should be noted that if and when the City decides to take on this venture, these coverages would be automatically included under the policy. 8) 60 Days Notice of Cancellation or Non-Renewal is provided, except for non-payment of premium. This is longer than the current 30 days. In order to provide the recommended coverages at a competitive rate, liability insurance contemplates $500. per occurrence deductible. Currently, there is no deductible for General Liability or Auto Liability; a 50-50 deductible on Police, subject to a maximum of $750. , and a $2,500 deductible on Errors or Omissions. It is our opinion that a $500. deductible per occurrence is not only prudent but extremely reasonable. Collision deductible is a uniform $250.00 and $100.00 on comprehensive coverage. As indicated previously, both the Police and Errors and Omissions coverage was provided under a "claims made" basis, it is necessary to provide "tail" coverage for these two policies so that, should a loss be reported that occurred during the previous policy term, the City would still be protected. This "tail" coverage will be provided for a two year period. The premium is included in the Primary Liability Policy. mEs EXCESS LIABILITY The recommended program greatly increases the coverage available to the City. The total limits available would be a total of $11,000,000 ($10,000,000 Umbrella plus $1,000,000 Primary Liability) , compared to $1,000,000 Primary for General Liability, Auto and Errors and Omissions and $500,000 Police, plus a $2,000,000 Umbrella. Coverage is increased approximately 400%. COMPUTER POLICY Currently the City's IBM System 34 Computer is provided coverage for a limit of $40,000, subject to a $250. deductible. Also included is $5,000. transit coverage. Our concern is that the City could suffer a loss both to the media being used and extra expense to continue operations, which would not be covered under the current policy. Accordingly, the recommended policy would be as follows. $40,000 - All Risk on IBM System 34, including breakdown $ 5,000 - Transit $ 5,000 - Extra Expense $ 5,000 - Media Coverage All coverage is subject to a $250. deductible, except breakdown, which is $1,000. The current policy does not include coverage for breakdown. CRIME COVERAGES .01111.4, The City currently carries the following: $ 50,000 - Public Employees Blanket Bond $100,000 - City Clerk Bond $ 5,000 - Monies and Securities Broad Form $ 500 - User Use Fuel Bond The recommended program will duplicate the existing policies, subject to a $500. deductible. These policies are standardized, no specific recommendation is made at this time. JamEs PROPERTY INSURANCE Current Property is written with specific limits for Building and Contents, Contractors Equipment, Extra Expense and Miscellaneous Articles. Coverage appears to be merely standard with nominal deductibles. The recommended program will utilize a Blanket Limit for all Property, i.e. , Building and Contents, Contractors Equipment and Miscellaneous Articles, etc. This provides for one limit of insurance and thus, should provide greater protection for the City. In addition to the Blanket Limit, coverage will either be increased or expanded as follows. 1) Extra Expense Limit increased to $100,000 from the current $25,000. 2) Valuable Papers and Records Coverage increased to $50,000 from the current $500 and Theft Coverage added. 3) Off Premises and Transit Coverage increased to $25,000, including Theft, from the current $10,000 of limit and coverage. 4) Addition of the Agreed Amount Endorsement, which eliminates co-insurance (penalty for underinsurance) . 5) Replacement Cost Coverage expanded to indicate that there is no requirement on the part of the insured to rebuild on the same site nor with materials of a like kind or quality. 6) Replacement Cost extends to the additional cost of rebuilding to meet Local or State Ordinance requirements, not to exceed location limit on the Statement of Values. 7) Additional coverage to provide the cost of demolishing portions of buildings that are required to be removed due to damage by an insured hazard, not to exceed the location limit on the Statement of Values. 8) No restriction on vacant property, assuming that it was not vacant when they were added to the schedule. 9) Waiver of Subrogation included. 10) 90 days prior written Notice of Cancellation, Non-Renewal or Reduction in Coverage required, except for non-payment of premium. A.. LamEs 11) Definition of Property expanded to include all property of an insurable nature, including but not limited to, buildings, furniture and fixtures, machinery and equipment, personal property, signs (whether or not attached to buildings) , fences, light fixtures and light poles, building service �► equipment, books, manuscripts and property of others, for which the insured is legally liable or for which is in the care, custody or control of the City. Current program utilizes various deductibles from $100 to $500, the recommended program utilizes a level $1,000 deductible per occurrence. „b. James LIABILITY A Manuscript Public Entity form will be utilized providing coverage for Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, including Police and Errors or Omissions. This applies to Automobile and General Liability. COVERAGES - $1,000,000 CSL w/$500. per occurrence deductible $10,000,000 Excess Limit Automobile - Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists - $30,000 - Owned, Non-Owned and Hired Car - Physical Damage (Fleet Automatic on all Power Units) - per schedule $250 ded - Collision $100 ded - Comprehensive - 60 Days Notice of Cancellation Liability - All Operations - Oral and Written Contract Coverage - Assault and Battery - Discrimination - Two Year "Tail” Coverage for prior claims made policy Miscellaneous - Flat Charge/No Audit - Occurrence Basis - 60 Days Prior Notice of Cancellation - Broad Definition of Insured mEs COMPUTER $40,000 Limit - IBM System 34 - $5,000 - Transit - $5,000 - Extra Expense - $5,000 - Media All Risk, including breakdown, subject to $250. deductible, except breakdown, which is $1,000. deductible James CRIME PUBLIC EMPLOYEES BLANKET BOND (All Employees Except Police) Insuring Agreement 3 - Faithful Performance, including Honesty $50,000 Limit w/$500 ded (Police) Insuring Agreement 1 - Honesty only (excluding Faithful Performance) $50,000 Limit w/$500 ded MONEY AND SECURITIES Loss Inside the Premises - $5,000 Limit Loss Outside the Premises - $5,000 Limit FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND City Clerk - $100,000 Limit USER-USE FUEL TAX BOND $500 Limit JamEs PROPERTY Policy is "All Risks" of direct physical loss, including theft, except as noted in exclusions, all subject to $1,000 deductible. Policy Includes - $769,555 - Blanket Limit Policy - $100,000 - Extra Expense - $ 25,000 - Property Off Premises/Transit - $ 50,000 - Valuable Papers and Records - Replacement Cost with no requirement to rebuild on same site - Replacement Cost for additional cost for rebuilding to meet state or local ordinance requirements, not to exceed limit on statement of values - Demolition coverage - No calculation of individual location rates - No scheduling of properties, other than annual statement of values - Agreed Amount (eliminates co-insurance) - Automatic coverage for newly acquired property, with no reporting required - No restriction on vacant property, assuming that they were not vacant when added to the schedule - No premium adjustments during policy term, except at anniversary, and then a forward adjustment only - 90 day notice required - Property of Others included - Off Premises Power Assumption Endorsement included ... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES i") , 9 V ' ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: jr01 SECONDED BY : 04.4 YE NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN HUDSON `` COUNCILMAN EIDSON `' YOR CLARKE FO I/ UNCILMAN DAMIANO , COUNCILMAN SHANKS 1 UNANITMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ! ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 25 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE FRED S . JAMES CO , BE AUTHORIZED TO PURCHASE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AS DESCRIBED IN THEIR LETTER TO THE CITY MANAGER DATED JUNE 9, 1982 , ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM If MEETING OF ;r___ MOTION BY: SECONDED I3Y: NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE 111.1111111111111111 COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH .COUNCILMAN SHANKS MINIMMEMI _COUNCILMAN H DSON VICE. MAYOR HI L L UNANITOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO, 26 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL COMPLEX ON JULY 6, 1982, AT 6 : 00 P .M. PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO , 151, ADOPTION OF CHAPTERS 3 & 4 OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , -OW Amok PQACHF✓G :.- ., yam. gRIZo0' city o &4 padre unction June 8, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: u)'' OE GERO for DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE ` V_, ICHARD BROMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ' ART ALLEN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - ORDINANCE NO. 151 ADOPTION OF CHAPTERS 3 & 4 of LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Chapters 3 and 4 of the Land Development Code are proposed to be those documents made a public record by Resolution No. 82-34 and entitled Chapter 3, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Street Improvements and Chapter 4, City of Apache Junction Special Provisions for Installation of Underground Utilities. As of this date, only minor technical comments have been made by those wishing to take advantage of the thirty-day review period. These comments have been considered and have resulted in minor alterations to the draft copies of the documents where they were not contrary to the best interests of the city. During the thirty-day period prior to the ordinance becoming effective, the staff will take measures to formally notify by letter all utilities, contractors, and others normally working in city rights-of-way. The notification will speak to the ordinance requirements and the need for permits to perform any work in the rights-of-way. Attached for Council information is a copy of the four-part permit which is to be used as indicated in the documents. The staff is // recommending no fee for permits at this time. Approver for Agenda -..l:' ---..._ &D/af• /� Yarn � First Reading //SA . JWG.rl b Second Reading ....�.. _V---Public Hearing ._ Old Business ........ New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 /11 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO PERFORM WORK ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY Construction Address Late Issued Owned By Address Phone No. Construction to be done by Contr. License No. Applicant's Name Phone No. Description of Construction Plans Approved By City Engineer's Office Date ''Special Conditions: Date Approved By I agree to the conditions set forth on the reverse side of permit, and understand that the work must be done in confomity with the Ordinances of the City of Apache Junction, and the laws of Lhe County of Pinal and the State of Arizona. Signature of Applicant X RECEIPT Cash Surety Amount Date Rec'd By Bond Bond Permit Fees Check No. Amount Refunded Date Issued By Name And Address Of Depositor Or Bonding Agency. ORDINANCE NO. 151 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADDING CHAPTERS 3 & 4 TO THE CITY CODE OF APACHE JUNCTION (VOLUME II - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE) PERTAINING TO CONSTRUC- TION ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN WHICH CHAPTER 3 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND CHAPTER 4 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND I- UTILITIES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL 1 Those certain documents which are made a public record by Resolution No. 82-34 and entitled "Chapter 3, Special Provisions for Construction of Street Improvements" and "Chapter 4, Special Provisions for Installation of Underground Utilities" are hereby added to "The Code of the City of Apache Junction, Volume II, Land Development Code" as Chapters 3 and 4 respectively, and henceforth are adopted and made a part thereof as if fully set out in this ordinance. 2 a. That certain document referred to as "Chapter 3, Special Provisions for Construction of Street Improvements," consisting of the following articles: Article 1 Compaction may_ -;.; , � :-�K: Article 2 Contraction and Expansion Joints for Curbs, Gutter, and Sidewalks Article 3 Testing Article 4 Materials b. That certain document referred to as "Chapter 4, Special Provisions for Installation of Underground Utilities," consisting of the following articles - Article I Specifications and Details Article II Plans, Specifications, Engineering Article III Excavation, Backfill, and Compaction Article IV Pavement Cutting and Restoration Article V Surface Restoration of Graveled or Earth Surface Roads Article VI Miscellaneous SECTION II PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF Any person, firm, or corporation, whether as principal, owner, agent, tenant, employee, or otherwise, who violates any provisions of this ordinance or violates or fails to comply with any order or regulation made hereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not more than one-thousand dollars ($1,000) or by a term not exceeding six (6) months or by both such fine and imprisonment, and each day's continuance of a violation shall be deemed a separate offense SECTION III REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION IV PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall ORDINANCE NO 151 PAGE TWO not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of 19 I Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST- Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM A k- (34,7/„„k„( City Attorney 1 Allok ROLL CALL VOTE 111 ET NOTES / tow (V. )1 Yi Xytj ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR HILL .COUNCILMAN EIDSON UNANIr!OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / J _ /7 ' \))))( ITEC1 # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN DAMIANO 111111011111 COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL 11.1111111111111111 COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL J .•. PQACHE.1 (41. p ' C� iR/ L. zyoNP `Oity o 04pac/ e cunctian June 9, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: -THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: at, JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: , ' JOE GERO, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES Attached are the approval Minutes of the May 11, 1982, regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please insert the original Minutes into the Minutes Book in the City Clerk's office. The next meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission will be a special meeting on June 29, 1982, at 7:00 p.m. , in the City Council Chambers, at which time a public hearing on the proposed General Plan will be held. • 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 oftik Amok MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA MAY 11, 1982 7:30 P.M. Present Absent Guests Mr. Hutchens Mr Baijo Fred Dickson Mr. Kell Mr Hall Mr. A.E. Sullivan, Jr Mr Oltman Mrs. A.E Sullivan, Jr Mr. Polomskey Irene Mietzner Mr. McPherson Dale Mietzner Mrs Taylor Stephen Bergaila Mrs Baker, Acting Chairman Clementine Bergaila Mr. Gero, Executive Secretary Alice Staples Ms. Breece, Recording Jc::retary Ben Honor John Granillo Robert Lake Thomas McCarville Hank McCarville Francis Duckworth Councilman Damiano Synopsis Approval of Minutes April 13, 1982 April 21, 1982 (Special Meeting) Public Hearings: PZ-7-82 Commission Initiative (Section 2806) PZ-6-82 (Lang/Sullivan) PZ-26-81 and AB-82-3 (Bunnell) PC-PZ-14-82 (First Avenue Financial Corporation) General Plan Community Meetings Motion to commend planning staff 1. Chairman called the meeting to order after the Invocation was offered by Mr. Kell and Mrs Taylor had led the Pledge of Allegiance. The Recording Secretary was asked to call the roll 2 Ms. Breece called the roll, determining seven members present and two al as indicated above. 3. Chairman called for a motion to approve the agenda 4. Taylor/Hutchens M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the agenda be approved as presented ' The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 5. Chairman called for a motion to approve the Minutes dated April 13 and April 21, 1982 6. Ms Taylor noted she was not shown as present at the April 13 meeting 7 Kell/Oltman M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated April 13, 1982, be approved as corrected and the Minutes dated April 21 be approved as presented." AO II\ r Page 2 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of May 11, 1982 The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 8. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-7-82 (Commission Initiative) and asked staff to brief the Commission. 9. Mr. Gero stated that the proposal is to mail notice only when an appli- cation seeks rezoning of property and not for text changes due to the expense and time consumption required. He emphasized that by mailing notice the city far exceeds state requirements 10. Chairman asked for staff recommendation, there being no public comment in favor or opposition to the proposal. 11. Mr. Gero presented DCC and staff recommendation of approval with the emergency clause 12. Chairman requested a motion after Commission discussion 13 Kell/Hutchens M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-7-82, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 143, application by Commission Initiative requesting a text change to Section 2806 of the zoning ordinance with the emergency clause, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application " The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 14. Chairman proceeded to the next public hearing, PZ-6-82 (Lang/Sullivan), and asked staff to brief the Commission 15 Mr Gero presented the case requesting GR be changed to CR-4 for three lots between North Palo Verde Drive and North Saguaro Drive and South of Superstition Blvd. A letter of opposition from Jerome and Bernadine Karmazan was read into the record 16. Chairman invited the applicant to speak 17. Mr. Sullivan, Jr. 438 North Saguaro Drive, Apache Junction, introduced himself as having power of attorney for Mr Lang He offered to answer questions by the Commission 18 Chairman asked for public comment in favor or opposition to the application 19 Mrs. Bergalla 353 North Palo Verde Drive, Apache Junction, commented that there Amokwas no objection to duplexes, but wanted assurance to be given that tri- and quadri-plexes would not be built 20 Chairman asked applicant if he would consider planned development. 21. Mr. Sullivan stated he would be unable financially to consider planned development 22. Chairman called for staff recommendation 23 Mr Gero stated the DCC had no objection or recommendation 24. Chairman called for a motion following Commission discussion. 25. Kell/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, in rezoning case PZ-6-82, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 144, application of Matt Lang and Arthur Sullivan, Jr , for the property described as: the west 125 feet of Lots 12 and 13, Block 2, Newtown Sub- division, and the east 145 feet of Lot 12, Block 2, Newtown Subdivision, Pinal County, Arizona, Page 3 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of May 11, 1982 requesting zone change from GR General Rural to CR-4 Multiple Residence zone that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. Stipulation is that applicants quit-claim for rights-of-way purposes 21/2 feet on both Saguaro and Palo Verde Drive. The reasons for the recommendation are 1. The area is medium density with multiple residence uses. 2 Studies indicated medium density recommended for the area/"►. The motion passed 5-2, with Mrs. Taylor and Mrs. Baker dissenting. 26. Chairman requested staff brief the Commission on the next case AB-82-3 (Bunnell). 27. Mr. Gero combined details of this and the next agenda item (PZ-26-81) with Commission consent He stated approval of the planned development would be contingent upon approval of the abandonment 28. Chairman invited the applicant to speak 29 Mr Granillo 930 East Desert Avenue, Apache Junction, introduced himself as having power of attorney for the applicant He requested expedient approval of the application since the original appli- cation was submitted last November. 30. Chairman called for a motion after Commission discussion, there being no public comment in favor or opposition 31. Polomskey/ M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the McPherson City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in street abandonment AB-82-3, also known as Proposed Resolution No 82-18, application of James Bunnell for the property described as l+ Parcel No 1 The west 33 feet of the West % of the Northwest 4 of the Northeast 4 of the Northwest 4 of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, EXCEPT the north 396 feet thereof, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, Parcel No. 2 The west 33 feet south of the Arizona State Route 88 southerly right-of-way line of the north 396 feet of the West 2 of the Northwest 4 of the Northeast 4 of the Northwest 4 of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, EXCEPT the north 50 feet thereof, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, requesting abandonment of the west 33 feet except that area north of Highway 88 and north of Superstition Boulevard, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. The reasons for the recommendation are It abandons a dangerous intersection." The motion passed unanimously (7-0). 32. Chairman called for a motion on PZ-26-81 33 Kell/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-26-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 130, application of James Bunnell for the property described as Page 4 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of May 11, 1982 Parcel No. 1 The north 396 feet of the West % of the Northwest ' of the Northeast 1 of the Northwest q of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Parcel No 2 The West ' of the Northwest 1 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest ', less the north 396 feet of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2/PD General Business zone by Planned Development the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Stipulation includes 1 Approval is contingent upon abandonment AB-82-3 2 Eight of nine recommendations of staff be honored, the ninth recommendation to be dealt with by staff in compliance with state and city require- ments 1) Sign plan to be submitted prior to final approval of planned development 2) Approval contingent upon abandonment 3) Treatment of flood zone area - 1st floor elevation 4) Utilities be placed underground 5) Agreements 6) TOPO 7) Offsites to city standards 8) Correct quit calim deed 9) No entrance-exit on Highway 88 The reasons for the recommendation are• 1 CB-2/PD is the highest and best use of the land being on state highway and section line road (arterial) 2. The proposal is in compliance with Section 33 09 of the zoning ordinance " The motion passed unanimously (7-0). 34. Chairman called a five-minute recess Upon reconvening at 9 05 p m , staff was requested to brief the Commission on the request from Pinal County (PC-PZ-14-82 First Avenue Financial Corp ) 35. Mr. Gero presented this Pinal County case requesting an 120-acre RV Park. He set forth several DCC requested requirements including dedication and construction of all peripheral roads except in the Superstition Freeway corridor 36 Chairman invited the applicant to speak 37. Mr. Duckworth 702 51st Avenue, Scottsdale, introduced himself as president of the First Avenue Financial Corporation He described the park as proposed for 1700 spaces, and stated Goldfield and Baseline would be improved to county standards, and a sewage treatment plant would be constructed 38. Mr. Gero read a letter from adjacent property owners that they will seek rezoning to light industrial for their parcel, they had no objection to this case. lak Page 5 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of May 11, 1982 39 Tom McCarville 401 North Marshall, Casa Grande, introduced himself as attorney for the corporation and responded to the letter by stating that light industrial would not be the highest and best use of the land due to the access situation. 40. Mr Gero asked applicant if the corporation was agreeable to required dedications. 41. Mr. Duckworth responded that it would be if the dedication was cones ducive to the county and the project 42. Chairman requested comment by the public 43. Councilman Damiano asked if parcels already developed in the area had given dedications. 44. Chairman called for staff recommendation. 45 Mr Gero commented that if approval of the project were recommended request for dedication and off-site improvement should be made. 46 Chairman called for a motion following Commission discussion 47 Taylor/Hutchens M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in Pinal County case PC-PZ-14-82, application of First Avenue Financial Corporation, the Commission recommends approval with the stipulation that the DCC areas of concern mentioned in its recommendation be resolved, off- site improvements be made, permits obtained and const- ruction be in accordance with Article 20-c of the Pinal County Zoning Ordinance " The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 48. Chairman asked for new business. 49. Polomskey/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the follow- ing recommendation be made to the Apache Junction City Council A letter of commendation be presented to Joseph Gerc'", Director of Planning, and to Charles Newcomer, Asso( Planner, for their dilligent and tireless efforts toward development of our general plan. Although they are paid staff members, we feel that they have worked far above and beyond their duties in this endeavor " The motion passed unanimously (7-0). 50 Mr Gero expressed his appreciation for this gesture 51 Chairman asked for further new business 52. Mr. Gero noted arrangements need to be made concerning scheduling community meetings regarding the general plan 53. Taylor/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commissio of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that authority be granted to the Chairman and Executive Secretary to determine a schedule for community meetings to allow discussion of the draft general plan and to advertise the dates." The motion passed unanimously (7-0) Ala. /"` Page 6 - Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of May 11, 1982 54 Taylor/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that a worksession will be held before the next regular meeting The worksession will begin at 7 00 p.m., June 8, in the City Hall Council Chambers " The motion passed unanimously (7-0) 55 Chairman called for a motion to adjourn, there being no further OgIN business. 56 Taylor/McPherson M/S that the meeting be adjourned and the meeting was adjourned at 9 45 by concensus. Respectfully submitted, Accepted, r g71\41 Joseph W. Gero Mildred Baker Executive Secretary Acting Chairman F PeACHE✓G f. 4R/ZONP `6ity o� C4pache cOunction June 8, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THROUGH: ( JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM ,vW)JOE GERO, PLANNING DIRECTOR ,CHUCK NEWCOMER, ACTING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUBJECT: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTIVITIES At the June 7, meeting of the Board, the following actions were taken: The public hearing on BA-5-82, a Board of Appeals case, was continued until the July 12 meeting; the requested variance to rear yard setback requirements in case BA-7-82 was denied. The next Board meeting will be Monday, July 12, at 7:00 p.m. , due to the July 4 holiday. Attached are the approval minutes from the May 3, 1982, regular meeting .� of the Board of Adjustment. Please have the original Minutes placed in the Minutes book in the City Clerk' s office. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)9824002 Ask MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD MAY 3, 1982 7 00 P M Present Absent Guests Mr Berry None Mr. Kelly Brown Mr Burfiend Mr George Luddy Mrs. Luddy Mr. Morrison Mayor Clarke Mrs Oberg Mr Vaughn, Vice-Chairman Mr. Jessamine, Chairman Mr. Newcomer, Executive Secretary Mr Eidson, Liaison Ms Breece, Recording Secretary Synopsis Public Hearings BA-5-82 (Southard) Board of Appeals BA-6-82 (Rogelstad) 1. Chairman called the meeting to order and asked the Recording Secretary to call the roll 2 Ms. Breece called the roll, determining all members were present. 3. Chairman asked for a motion to approve the Minutes of April 5, 1982 ii 4. Burfiend/Vaughn M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated April 5, 1982, be adopted, as presented." The motion passed 6-0-1, with Ms Luddy voting "present" due to her absence at the last meeting. 5. Chairman asked staff to brief the Board on case PZ-5-82 (Southard) Am\ 6 Mr Newcomer stated the applicant wished the Board to continue the public hearing due to attempt to resolve matter with the building official. 7 Chairman called for a motion, following Board discussion 8. Vaughn/Berry M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the public hearing on case BA-5-82 be continued until the Monday June 7, 1982, regular meeting at 7 00 p m., at the City Hall Complex, 1001 North Idaho Road " The motion passed unanimously (7-0). 9. Chairman asked staff to brief the Board on BA-6-82 (Rogelstad). 10 Mr Newcomer presented the case as being a request for a variance to rear yard setback requirements for a lot in Sierra Entrada Garden Homes Subdivision. The applicant wishes to put a roof over a patio area which would reduce the rear yard setback to 12' 11. Chairman invited the applicant to speak. Adok. Amok Page 2 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of May 3, 1982 12. Mr. Kelly Brown introduced himself as representative of the applicant He explained lots in this subdivision are substandard size. He stated the original buyers' covenants set rear yard setback requirements at 12' in compliance with county regulations which were in effect at the time When the city was incorporated, the setback was changed to 25'. (Because of the substandard lot size, Section 2309 (C) allows reduction of 5'; thus, the current 20' ) He contended the original 12' is conducive to the intent of the subdivision as "garden homes." 13. Mr Morrison asked if policy was being established for the entire subdivision 14. Mr. Newcomer reiterated that the planned development would eliminate such problems 15. Mr. Jessamine hoped square footage requirements were being included in the proposed planned development ordinance. 16 Mr. Vaughn expressed concern that a further variance might be requested once the 12' minimum was adopted by the planned development. 17 Mr Berry wondered if setting this precedent might result in several requests for the same. 18 Mr Newcomer responded that anyone could submit an application for variance. 19. Mr Vaughn noted the normal setback of 25' had already been reduced to 20' 20. Mr. Kelly responded that the original covenants stated 12' rear yard setback 21. Ms. Luddy asked the applicant if it would be possible to wait for a decision on this matter; that the planned development would resolve the issue for the entire subdivision. 22 Mr Kelly answered that the building official had suggested they pursue a variance. He felt the city should grant variance since they had followed prescribed proce 23 Chairman pointed out that the subdivision's substandard lot sizes cause problems. He felt approval should be granted because of this and the fact the applicant had done all the city had asked. He called for a motion, there being no public comment in favor or opposition. 24. Burfiend/Berry M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the requested variance in case BA-6-82 be denied The Board bases its decision on the following reasons 1 Section 2309 (C) of the city zoning ordinance provides the property owner with sufficient relief from the normal 25 foot setback requirements of the CR-3 zoning district to make reasonable use of his property 2 The Zoning Administrator recommends denial in his memorandum dated April 20, 1982 The motion passed 5-2-0, with Mr. Jessamine and Mr Vaughn dissenting. Page 3 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of May 3, 1982 25. Chairman asked if there was further business. 26. Mr Newcomer noted the change to the Rules and Procedures had been completed He detailed procedures for Board field trips. 27 Chairman adjourned the meeting by concensus at 7.40 p m. , there being no further business. Amok Respectfully submitted, Accepted, /Wil( 7 / �6Karles New r oe J }ne Acting Executive Secretary C r an f APACHE JUNCTION PUBLIC LIBRARY MONTHLY REPORT Librarian' s report to the Library Board of Trustees for the month of May, 1982. CIRCULATION Number of books issued Apache Junction 471 Pinal County 314 Library Extension 33 Service Paperbacks 1,498 Total 2,316 Number of magazines issued 131 Number of puzzles issued 3 Number of records issued _____ Total Circulation 2,453 Number of days open for issue of books 12 Average daily circulation 204 Largest daily circulation May 21 453 Smallest daily circulation May 25 193 RECEIPTS Fines on overdue books $18.17 Cards to out-of-county 10.00 Donations ( including sales of books and magazines) 46.80 Total Receipts $$74.97 ADDITIONS Books added to collection 106 Books withdrawn 58 New readers registered 76 F�Gicip,c jv 2" ' L $ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 4,p/Z00' (Oily o c471uche 2unctian W E McDANIEL June 4, 1982 oink Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Director of Public Safety/C) Thru: A City Manager Subject_:,\)J Departmental Report - May 1982 Attached you will find our departmental report for May, 1982. Injury and Non-injury accidents are down from April as are Burglaries and Larcenies. While this gives us some slack with the Winter visitors away, certain types of enteries are occurring that will not be reported until these visitors return in the Fall. Speed citations are up, as they often are with the travel through the City to the Lakes. Our D.W.I. activity, at 95, is over half of the total for all of last year with less than half of the year over. Animal Control activity is as follows: Complaints: 60 Impound Fees: $ 98.00 License Fees: 190.00 Total May $288.00 Deposited to General Fund Total from April 2718.00 $3006.00 Deposited to General Fund 1-1-82 thru 5-31-82 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD •POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 2 Impounded Adopted Reclaimed Dogs 84 29 16 Cats 35 21 0 Destroyed In Pound at End of Month Dogs 43 16 Cats 21 0 Dog Licenses Sold to Date 1982 Licenses 592 Kennel Permits Sold to Date 4 Citations Issued Dog Running at Large: 3 Unlicensed Dog: 1 p APACHE JUNLIION F'OLILE DEPARTMENT Departmental Activity JAN FEB MAR APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC TOTAL ACCIDENTS * 961 32 13 12 15 7 79 * 961 Accident-No Injury S 0 0 0 1 0 1 962 Accident-Injury AL 0 0 0 1 0 1 963 Accident-Fatality 962 22 14 2 7 5 50 P Persons Injured p 40 18 7 16 8 89 or Killed S 1 3 0 2 0 6 S Speed Related AL 1 1 1 2 1 6 AL Alcohol Related 963 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 AL 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC CITATIONS SPEED 55 71 86 71 96 379 ALCOHOL 25 19 18 16 17 95 OTHER 139 96 110 95 99 539 INDEX CRIMES MURDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROBBERY 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 BURGLARY 11 8 17 11 7 54 AG ASSAULT 1 1 1 2 1 6 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 1 4 2 4 1 12 LARCENY 35 28 34 43 34 174 ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( C. R. T. HITS FELONY 1 7 4 3 1 16 MISDEMEANOR 11 11 26 5 12 65 • Amok. Adak CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FINANCIAL REPORT - MAY 1982 DURING THE MONTH OF MAY, 1982 , THE CITY EXPENDED FROM THE GENERAL FUND $ 132,236.43 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS DEPOSIT $ 0 RECEIVED REVENUES TO THE GENERAL FUND $ 135,691.61 yessb, ENCUMBRANCES ON THE GENERAL FUND $ 20,410.41 BANK BALANCE FOR THE GENERAL FUND IS $ 120.636.53 THE GENERAL FUND SAVINGS, DRAWING 54% INTEREST, $ 444.57 THE COURT BONDS HOLDING CHECKING ACCOUNT INDICATES A BALANCE OF $ 5,032.50 THE HIGHWAY USERS CHECKING EXPENDED $ 10,355.88 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS DEPOSIT $ 0 RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ 26,934 24 ENCUMBRANCES ON HIGHWAY USERS ARE $ 3,396.75 BANK BALANCE FOR HIGHWAY USERS IS $ 85,527 09 THE HIGHWAY USERS SAVINGS, DRAWING 54% INTEREST, $ 575.68 THE PUBLIC WORKS RESERVE FUND DRAWING 54% INTEREST, $ 5,121.79 "o'\ THE GRANTS IN TRUST CHECKING EXPENDED $ 3,733 20 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS DEPOSIT $ 0 RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ 620.17 ENCUMBRANCES ON THE GRANTS IN TRUST ARE $ 0 OBLIGATION ON THIS ACCOUNT IS $ 2,204.03 BANK BALANCE OF GRANTS IN TRUST ACCOUNT IS $ 7,202.37 THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING CHECKING ACCOUNT EXPENDED $ in,Dfi4 94 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS $ n RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ n ENCUMBRANCES ON THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING ARE$ /120 t3 BANK BALANCE FOR FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING IS $ 22,929 61 f ek. oak CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FINANCIAL REPORT — CASH BALANCES LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FUND CHECKING ACCOUNT EXPENDED $ 11,983 21 TRANSFERRED TO IDLE FUNDS $ 0 RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ 0 ENCUMBRANCES $ 60,877.48 Amok BANK BALANCE FOR THE L.T.A.F. IS $ tl,73 62 LIBRARY FUND EXPENDED $ t ftrtl 28 RECEIVED REVENUES OF $ 71 55 ENCUMBRANCES $ 471 80 BANK BALANCE $ q rq6 PAYROLL ACCOUNT EXPENDED $ 58,132.74 BANK BALANCE $ 37,449.30 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $-500,000.00 WAS PLACED WITH FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS ON 6-1 8? DRAWING INTEREST OF 13.375 Am\ MAKING UP THIS CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT GENERAL FUND $ 280,000 HIGHWAY USERS 0 GRANTS IN TRUST 110,000. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING 110,000. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FUND 0 SUBMITTED BY ROSEMARY MONTGOMERY 4, f CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JUNE 2, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 18, — 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-18, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY PURPOSES ON NORTH WINCHESTER ROAD IS NO Certified copy sent to Pinal LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND Pinal County 6/2/82 IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS A PRESENT Posted 6/3/82 OR FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, BE AND HEREBY IS C.C. APPROVED. (motion carried. ) Planning THAT ORDINANCE NO. 143, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) THAT ORDINANCE NO. 143, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING SECTION 2806 COMMISSION ACTION .AND SECTION 2807 CITY COUNCIL 'S ACTION; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING Published 6/6-6/11/82 FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE C .C. Posted 6/3/82 AND HEREBY IS, ADOPTED AND APPROVED. Planning (motion carried. ) ` THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-27, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FINDING THAT 1970 U.S. CENSUS BUREAU DESIGNATED ENUMERATION DISTRICT ED-1, ED-2 , ED-3, AND ED-4 ARE DECLARED TO BE THE TARGET AREA Certified copies provided FOR THE 1982-83 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT C.C . Posted 6/3/82 PROGRAM, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Planninc (motion carried. ) THAT THE PROPOSED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Board of Supervisors and BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND PINAL Councty Engineer to be COUNTY FOR THE SHARED COSTS OF PAVING SOUTHERN advised accordingly. AVENUE IN THREE (3) LOCATIONS IS DETERMINED TO BE A FAIR, EQUITABLE, AND ECONOMICALLY SOUND AGREEMENT. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 21 , 1982, BE AND HEREBY IS. C.C. Certified copy provided APPROVED. (motion carried. ) P.W. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JUNE 1, 1982 MOTION ACTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-28, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER TO ORDER THE INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHTS WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SUBDIVISIONS KNOWN AS APACHE Posted 6/3/82 VILLA THREE, APACHE VILLA FOUR, AND CLEARVIEW, BE C.C. Certified copy provided. AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. (motion carried. ) P.W. Utility to be advised accordingly. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-23, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO TAXATION, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CIT OF APACHE JUNCTION, SUBJECT TO TAXATION, AND WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS SL-8011-1, A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT REQUIRE' FOR THE ANNUAL EXPENSE OF THE SAID MUNICIPAL Certified copy provided. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, AND C.C. Posted 6/3/82 DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. (motion carried. ) P.W. County assessor to be advised. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-30, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, RELATING TO TAXATION, LEVYING UPON THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, SUBJECT TO TAXATION, AND WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT SL-8203-1, A CERTAIN SUM UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS OF VALUATION SUFFICIENT TO RAISE THE AMOUNT REQUIRE') FOR THE ANNUAL EXPENSE OF THE SAID MUNICIPAL Certified copy provided. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICTS, AND C.C. Posted 6/3/82 DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. (motion carried. ) p.w. County assessor to be advise THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-31 , A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON PHELPS DRIVE, BETWEEN BROADWAY AVENUE AND HIGHWAY 60, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. C.C. Posted 6/3/82 (motion carried. ) P.S jP. I. Engineering and operation THAT THE ITEM PERTAINING TO FEES FOR THE COMMUNI Y coordinating installation SERVICES BUILDING, BE TABLED. (motion carried. ) C.C. Action Completed. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JUNE 1, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT A WORK SESSION AND AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY COMPLEX ON JUNE 15, 1982, AT 6:00 P.M. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 6/3/82 THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY MANAGER TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO REVISE, UP-GRACE, AMEND, AND STREAMLINE THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE RE-ZONING PROCEDURES IMMEDIATELY AFTER ADOPTION OF A GENERAL PLAN. FURTHERMORE, THAT THE COUNCIL BE REQUESTED TO ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCESS. AND FURTHERMORE, THAT THE FIRST PROGRESS REPORT FROM THE PLANNING DIRECTOR BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY MANAGER NO LESS THAN 60 DAYS FROM ADOPTION C.M. OF A GENERAL PLAN. (motion carried. ) Planning THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 8:03 P.M. Action completed. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING OF May 18, 1982 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION 3/2/82 THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO CHECK Auditors checking with Audito' INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF USING 10% OF EXCESS General 's Office. BUILDING FEES TO GO TO THE SWIMMING POOL FUND. (Mayor Clarke) C.M. THAT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FURTHER STUDY NOISE PROBLEM CREATED BY DOG POUND AND PRESENT ALTERNATIVES AND COSTS AT NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. (Councilman Damiano and Councilman Steelsmith) P.S. In holding pattern. 3/16/82 THAT APPROPRIATE STAFF STUDY PRESENT SIGN REGULATIONS AND DRAFT A SIGN ORDINANCE. (Councilman Steelsmith) Planning 5/18/82 THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF TO WORK WITH NECESSARY OFFICIALS AND AGENCIES TO PUSH FOR EXTENSION OF SUPERSTITION FREEWAY. P.W. Coordinating with League of (Councilman Eidson) C.M. Cities. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF TO DISPLAY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. (Vice Mayor Hill ) C.C. Awaiting processing of photographs. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF TO POST NAME PLATES FOR ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS ON DOOR TO COUNCIL OFFICE. (Councilman Shanks) C.C. plates and holders ordered 5/21/82. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS ACTION NOT COMPLETED MEETING ACTION DATE REQUEST AGENCY STATUS 1/5/82 THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FURTHER STUDY THE QUESTION OF ANNEXATION OF THE PROPOSED AIRPORT PROPERTY AND REPORT TO THE COUNCIL THEIR FINDINGS WITHIN THE Due date extended at the NEXT SIX MONTHS. (motion carried. ) 6/1/82 Council work sess= ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 14 Il/ ., o f / CI ) (/),O, , / 5 )/j-i{k" nve, )-(:(//A 1 , Af - Ty I if ete ti 0 ITEM # MEETING OF 17 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YE NO ABSTAINED COHNCII MAN D MIAN0 COUNCILMAN EIDSON V/ COUNCILMAN HUDSON MAYOR CLARKE JIIcT MAYOR HILL V _COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCII MAN SHANKS UNANII US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1\1\ 111 I0 ITEM # MEETING OF ci MOTION BY : SECONDED BY : 11IP YE NO ABSTAINED MAYOR CLARKE 1 COl1NC I LMAN DPMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCIl .N SHANKS COUNCILMAN FTTSON VICE MAYOR -HILL UUANI!OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AA. ITEM NO , 28 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P .M. ROLL CALL ROLL CALL PRESENT I ABSENT I s. W.S. CU MAYOR Cl ARIA `� VICE—MAYOR HILL ! ✓ E f COUNCILMAN EIDSON ! � COUNCILMAN HUDSON i ✓ LOUNCILMAN SEA"MKS ✓ j COUNCILMAN SIftLSMITH i I ✓ i j ( i cOuNCILMAr, DA.r•1IArd0 ! c/ V � TOTAL — STAFF PRESENT W.S. CITY MANAGER _JAMES TUVELL CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 0•_./ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Joe Gero DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman CITY ATTORNEY Mr, Alexander/Mr. Hirsch OTHER