Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 07.20 City Council Regular Agenda yP.CHF � *� � r.yM1y (�� V s Z `�a � i 4.,,..::„; qR/ZONP ` ity on &4pache 02unction CITY COUNCIL Aft., REGULAR MEETING AGENDA JULY 20, 1982 7 : 00 P.M. 6: 00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION 6: 00 P.M. WORK SESSION INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (1) ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA (2) ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 6, 1982 AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS , AND COMMUNICATIONS CALL TO THE PUBLIC CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS (3) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 149, LIBRARY BOARD (First Reading) (4) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 150 , ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE OF THE LIBRARY (First Reading) (5) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 153 , ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA (First Reading) (6) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-48, DECLARING GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC DOCUMENT (7) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-01 , ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN OLD BUSINESS (8) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 129, MATOUSEK (Second Reading) - 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 p (9) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 147 , CURRIE (Second Reading) (10) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 148 , KOVACS (Second Reading) NEW BUSINESS (11) AWARD OF BID, FUEL PROJECT NO. PW-82-5 (12) APPOINTMENTS TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION (13) EXECUTIVE SESSION, WORK SESSION AUGUST 3 , 1982 (14) WORK SESSION, AUGUST 2 , 1982 (15) INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) REQUESTS OF COUNCIL (16) ADJOURNMENT THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE AND FOR TAKING AN INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. PLEASE COME AGAIN AND BRING YOUR FRIENDS. Items To Note: 1) Appointment of AD-Hoc Committee to study Mobile Home/Travel Trailer Park Vendors (tabled since April 20, 1982) 2) Appointment of City Board of Health (action still pending since April 6, 1982) 3) Appointment of City Health Officers . (action still pending since April 6, 1982) ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ct, 41-0 ...... 4 ITEM # MEETING O , MOTION BY: '11(9.11/-71/1 SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILVM SHANKS iii MAYOR CLARKE COUNC I LMAN HUDSON i COUNCILMAN DAM I ANO VICE 1AYOR HILL i V COUNCILMAN EIDSON I , / l./ UNANI"^ US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL p ITEM NO , 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED . .•. i► CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JULY 6, 1982 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on July 6, 1982, at the Apache Junction Council Chambers Amok pursuant to the notice required by law CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.. INVOCATION Councilman Shanks led the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilman Steelsmith led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL Councilmen Present- Councilman Damiano, Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Hudson, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke IL Staff Present City Manager J James Tuvell City Clerk Kathleen Connelly Director of Public Works Rich Broman Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Director of Planning Joe Gero City Engineer Art Allen City Attorney Arnold Hirsch t\ Others Present Mr. Albert W. Haines 202 N Meridian Space #88 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Earnest Perkins 616 N Cactus Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. George Baljo 1070 E. Navajo Avenue Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. Vincent Matousek 139 S. Crismon Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Mr. A.E. Sullivan 438 N. Saguaro Drive Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA Vice Mayor Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Nek Councilman Damiano seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 15, 1982 Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 15, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Clarke thanked Ms Ilene Taylor and the Local Convention Committee for making it possible for the Arizona Mobile Housing Association to have a convention in Apache Junction, and presented Certificates of Appreciation to the entire Local Convention Committee Mayor Clarke introduced Ms Elaine Chambers, a representative of the Superstition Mountain Money Bucket Brigate and presented a Proclamation for "Bury the Bucket Week" Ms Chambers explained that the organization collects funds for charities, ILsuch as the Animal Control Shelter, and initiated the "Bury the Bucket Week" Councilman Shanks presented $6 34 for the Swimming Pool Fund, which was given her by some children at the Fourth of July Firework's Celebration Mr. Earnest Perkins, 616 N. Cactus, Apache Junction, presented a check for $125 00 to the Swimming Pool Fund, which was raised at a "Wild West" celebration on Father's Day Mr Albert Haines, 202 N Meridian, Apache Junction, donated $100 00 to the Swimming Pool Fund. City Manager J. James Tuvell expressed his appreciation of the donations, stating that the act of giving is more important than the amount given, and was an indication of community interest in the swimming pool CALL TO THE PUBLIC Mr. George Baljo, 1070 E. Navajo Avenue, Apache Junction, expressed his concern about the present zoning ordinance and recommended that it be updated and revised CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 129, MATOUSEK (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE TWO AM► Admik Director of Planning Joe Gero, briefed the Council on the petition Mr. Vincent Matousek, 139 S Crismon Rd , Apache Junction, requested that the Council approve this rezoning application Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public Mr. Gero stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation is denial of the application. Councilman Damiano asked if there were any other CB-2 zoned parcels in the area Mr. Gero stated that this section of land is mostly surrounded by CR-1 zoning. Mayor Clarke pointed out that there were enough signatures for this application to be submitted, but that on two sides the zoning is residential Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 129, by title only for the first reading City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO 129, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-81 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 147, CURRIE (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Director of Planning Joe Gero, briefed the Council on the petition. Mr. A.E. Sullivan, of 438 N. Saguaro Drive, Apache Junction, representing Ms Mary Currie, requested the Council approve this application. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Mr Gero stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Development Coordinating Committee both recommend approval of this application. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No. 147, by title only for the first reading { City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO 147, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-9-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE THREE IOW PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 148, KOVACS (First Reading) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. Director of Planning Joe Gero, stated that this is a rezoning application from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone k - Mr Mike Kovacs stated that he would answer any questions asked by the Council. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public Mr. Gero stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, as this is the best use for the property. Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 148, by title only for the first reading City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows ORDINANCE NO. 148, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS ) Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public City Manager James Tuvell stated that this is the third public hearing for the proposed uses for Federal Revenue Sharing Funds and that all federal requirements have been met. Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone ,..� who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the application. There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PROPOSED USES OF THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED Councilman Hudson seconded the motion VOTE. Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO 82-46, FINAL ADOPTION OF BUDGET Mayor Clarke opened the hearing to the public. City Manager Tuvell stated that the FY 82-83 proposed budget was tentatively adopted by the Council at the regular meeting of June 15, 1982, and the Budget is now presented for REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE FOUR final adoption, with the only option being decreasing the overall budget amount Mayor Clarke asked if there was anyone 4 who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the proposed budget There being no one wishing to address the Council, Mayor Clarke closed the hearing to the public. h' Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, �••► ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY { COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FULLY ADOPTING ESTIMATES OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BY THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1982, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1983; DECLARING THAT SUCH SHALL ESTABLISH THE BUDGET OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Mr Tuvell added that the final printed budget will be available for public review in approximately a week. Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting at 8.07 p.m.. OLD BUSINESS t PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 151, ADOPTION OF CHAPTERS 3 & 4 OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (Second Reading) City Engineer Art Allen, stated that he is available for any questions of the Council or public. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 151, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING Amok, OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried Mayor Clarke called upon the City Clerk to read Ordinance No 151, by title only for the second reading. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, read as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 151, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADDING CHAPTERS 3 AND 4 TO THE CITY CODE OF APACHE JUNCTION (VOLUME II - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE) PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC RIGHTS- OF-WAY IN WHICH CHAPTER 3 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND CHAPTER 4 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO 151, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADDING CHAPTERS 3 AND 4 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE FIVE Amok TO THE CITY CODE OF APACHE JUNCTION (VOLUME II - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE) PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN WHICH CHAPTER 3 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND CHAPTER 4 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. RESIGNATION FROM PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ITEMS 9a AND 9b BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. Councilman Hudson seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATIONS FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, SUBMITTED BY MS DEDE SCHEFF AND MR. PHIL RICHARDSON, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. Councilman Damiano read the following letters. Due to conflicting schedules I feel I am no longer able to serve on the board of Parks and Recreation I will hope that you will be able to fill my position as soon as possible I will still be in the community and if I can ever be of service to you, please do not hesitate to call on me. Sincerely, DeDe Scheff I wish to resign my appointment effective as of May 25, 1982. I cannot put forth the time needed at this time. -.i Thank you, Phil Richardson VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. RESIGNATION FROM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Councilman Hudson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE RESIGNATION FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, SUBMITTED BY MS SANDRA OBERG, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE SIX .. Councilman Hudson read the following letter I herewith submit my resignation from the Apache Junction Board of Adjustment effective immediately. Serving on this Board has been an enjoyable and educational experience and it is regrettable that I am unable to continue However, I find due to other obligations that ime is not available to effectively serve the Board Sandra Oberg Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion VOTE• Unanimous The motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ITEM NOS. 10a, 10b, 10c, AND 10d, BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE Councilman Steelsmith seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Steelsmith MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT MILDRED BAKER, JOHN P. HUTCHENS, AND RON KELL, BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, IL SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985 Mayor Clarke requested that the record show that as this motion was not seconded, the motion failed. Mayor Clarke asked the City Attorney for a recommendation Mr. Arnold Hirsch stated that the item could be tabled until a later meeting, or another motion made. Vice Mayor Hill MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED ,^ BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT GARY PAGE, RICHARD SANCHEZ, AND MILDRED BAKER, BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. Councilman Shanks seconded the motion VOTE: In Favor. Councilman Edison, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Shanks, • Councilman Hudson, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke _ Opposed: Councilman Steelsmith The motion carried APPOINTMENTS TO AIRPORT COMMISSION Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT PRICILLA GARDNER, AND LAWRENCE LEPIC, BE APPOINTED TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSION, SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985, AND S. PATRICK BERGERE, BE APPOINTED AS AN EX OFFICIO MEMBER SAID TERM TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1983. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE SEVEN Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. to APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT LILLIAN CASTRO, AND DONALD TAYLOR, BE APPOINTED TO THE Il LIBRARY BOARD OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985 Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT HARVEY MORRISON, BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, SAID TERM TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1984, AND MARY LUDDY, AND DIANA DUNLOP, BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, SAID TERf4TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. Councilman Hudson seconded the motion VOTE• Unanimous IL The motion carried NEW BUSINESS PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-45, RECOGNITION OF ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC ) City Manager James Tuvell informed the Council that the Arizona Emergency Medical Systems is required by State law to seek the support of the area they serve annually, which is the purpose of the proposed resolution. Mr. Tuvell also stated that this requires no financial committment. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-45, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, RECOGNIZING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC , AS THE LOCAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE COORDINATING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES §36-2210, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. r_ Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 82-47, SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ON BROADWAY AVENUE) Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel requested that this resolution be passed, establishing a speed limit of REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE EIGHT ,� fj Am. I 35 mph on Broadway Avenue, from Tomahawk Road to Goldfield Road. Councilman Shanks MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ,4 ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-47, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON BROADWAY AVENUE, BETWEEN TOMAHAWK AND GOLDFIELD ROADS, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. x , -b Councilman Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried y_ EXECUTIVE SESSION AND .. WORK SESSION, JULY 20, 1982 ) Councilman Eidson MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT THE CITY HALL COMPLEX ON JULY 20, 1982, AT 6:00 P.M.. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE Unanimous The motion carried INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) Councilman Damiano stated that the Gazebo is nearly completed IL City Manager Tuvell announced that Business License Clerk Elaine Sammons, will be married in the gazebo on July 10, 1982 Councilman Damiano announced to the public that if there are any questions on when a specific street will be paved, they may call a councilmember for that information. Mayor Clarke commended the staff on the street repairs accomplished. • Councilman Eidson invited the public to attend the Board of Adjustment meeting to be held on Monday, July 12, 1982, at 7 00 p m 1 Councilman Shanks congratulated the Parks and Recreation Commission on the success of the July 4th Firework's celebration City Manager Tuvell informed the Council that the Statutes require the Library Board to report annually to the City Council on the activities over the past year, which is to include a financial report, a copy of which will be available for Council review. I ,',;;,< . Mayor Clarke requested that the City Manager check into getting a new sign for the Apache Junction Library REQUESTS OF COUNCIL Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, • ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON AUGUST 4, 1982, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE NINE 1 Auk VOTE Unanimous The motion carried. Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MONDAY, JULY 19, 1982, AT 7 00 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. Aommk VOTE In Favor Councilman Shanks, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Eidson, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke Opposed Councilman Steelsmith, Councilman Hudson The motion carried Mayor Clarke MOVED THAT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT COUNCILMAN HUDSON BE APPOINTED AS LIAISON ON SWIMMING POOL FUND. Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion VOTE: In Favor. Councilman Eidson, Councilman Damiano, Councilman Shanks, Councilman Steelsmith, Vice Mayor Hill, Mayor Clarke Abstained Councilman Hudson The motion carried. Councilman Shanks announced that bumper stickers are available for the Swimming Pool Fund promotion Mayor Clarke recessed the meeting into Executive Session. Mayor Clarke reconvened the meeting at 9 20 p m ADJOURNMENT Councilman Damiano MOVED THAT BE IT /k. RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT 9 22 P M Vice Mayor Hill seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous • The motion carried APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. f_ Wendell J Clarke Mayor REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE TEN Ink ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk • - I • • • II Y'„' <'3�"' LsB'F+"z-'u44?r'' .. z'^p•;c.' �. +.,',, , „ . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1982 PAGE ELEVEN ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: V- SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COIINCH MAN DAM ANO rnuNCILMAN EIDSON COUNC I_Lr"AN HUDSON MAYOR Cl ARKE _[I CF MAYOR HILL -COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH CQUN.CTI MAN SHANKS Uf1ANIr1O , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL r. ITEM NO , 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 6, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED , ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 1101 Y/11 SI /Pi -! ' I/f)12/ • ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: Q15614 SECONDED BY: ? YES NO ABSTAINED CO1J CII MAN DAMIANO 7 COLINCILMAN EIDSON V COHNC IL AN _EIDSON /I/ MAYOR Cl ARKE iIIlF MAYOR HILL V _COUNCILMAN STEELSMIT1 COUNCTI MAN SHANKS V UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL "aft, /'\. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HOLD A SPECIAL MEETING ON FRIDAY, JULY 23, 1982, AT 6: 00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING 1 , THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 149 , LIBRARY BOARD 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY MANAGER 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME , 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , PQACHE .•. 0 �tT C� r51ig, . W ` 771. � . U �°"" I1� Z Wily on _ ,7uc/e cOunctian July 15 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO . THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM. ti CITY MANAGER SUBJECT. ; PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO 149 - LIBRARY BOARD With the acquisition of the Apache Junction Library in January of this year, the role of the Library Board of Trustees became vital to the operation of the facility. Certain duties of the Library Board, including various legal responsibilities , are outlined in the Arizona Revised Statutes § 9-411 through 9-419 . The present City Code provides only for the establishment of the Board, but does not elaborate on any operational guidelines such as the length of terms , personal expenses , election of officers , etc The Code does provide these same guidelines for all other city boards and commissions . Proposed Ordinance No . 149 details the role of the Library Board of Trustees in accordance with the State Statutes and in com- pliance with those guidelines set forth for other boards and commissions . Information from other cities , both general law and charter, was used in compiling this ordinance. The Library Board has met and reviewed the ordinance and their recommended changes have been included in the ordinance you now have before you for consideration If you wish additional information, please contact me. V A J . James Tuvel l, Jr. PPrntier for Agen /d( Item # City Manager Kirst da iAivt 1/41 �,� kmc ,/ r. t�,.,•-'ng Q _. o ' , c tinIness 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 p ( p ORDINANCE NO 149 F`F AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 2-7 LIBRARY BOARD BY ADDING SECTION 2- 7-1 CREATION, SECTION 2-7-2 MEMBERSHIP AND TERM Aloft. OF OFFICE, SECTION 2-7-3 SALARIES AND PERSONAL EXPENSES, SECTION 2-7-4 OFFICERS, SECTION 2-7-5 MEETINGS, SECTION 2-7-6 VACANCIES, SECTION 2-7-7 REMOVAL OF MEMBERS, SECTION 2-7-8 DUTIES; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL That Article 2-7 Library Board, be amended to read as follows Article 2-7 Library Board 7-1 Creation 7-2 Membership and Terms of Office 7-3 Salaries and Personal Expenses 7-4 Officers 7-5 Meetings 7-6 Vacancies 7-7 Removal of Members IL 7-8 Duties Section 2-7-1 Creation There is hereby established the Apache Junction Public Library, to be governed by seven trustees, in compliance with section 9-411 to 9-419, Arizona Revised Statutes (1956) , said sections of statutes being adopted by reference just as if copies fully herein, said city reserving the right to levy taxes for the support of said library as provided by law Section 2-7-2 Membership and Terms of Office A The Library Board shall consist of seven (7) trustees who shall be appointed by the Mayor and approved by the City Council. Ex officio trustee, without voting privileges, may be designated by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council B. The terms of the trustees shall be for three years, and shall commence on the first day of July of each year and end on the 30th day of June three years thereafter or until their successors are duly appointed and qualified. Such terms shall be so staggered that the terms of no more than three trustees shall conclude in any given year Ex officio members shall serve for a term not to exceed one (1) year. C All trustees and ex officio members shall be residents of the City of Apache Junction. Section 2-7-3 Salaries and Personal Expenses The trustees of the Library Board shall receive no salaries or other remuneration for their services in such capacity, and shall not be entitled to personal expenses incurred by them in the discharge of their official duties, except to the extent and purposes and amount such expense is first authorized and approved by the City Council. Ordinance No.149 Page One of Three Ilk Section 2-7-4 Officers A The officers of the Boards shall include a president, vice-president and secretary who shall be elected by the members at the first meeting of the Board following the 30th day of June of each year Such officers shall serve until the 30th day of June of the next succeeding year B In the absence of the president, the vice-president shall preside at meetings In the absence of the vice-president, the secretary shall serve in that capacity C No officer shall serve in the same capacity for more than one consecutive year Section 2-7-5 Meetings A The Board shall meet for regular business purposes on the first Tuesday of each month and at other times, as they shall appoint, for special meetings B. A quorum shall consist of four (4) voting members for the transaction of all business Section 2-7-6 Vacancies Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council in accordance with Section 2-7-2 for the unexpired term of the member affected Section 2-7-7 Removal of Members Members of the Board serve at the pleasure of the Council IL and may be removed by the Mayor with the concurrence of the Council A member shall not be absent from Library Board regular meetings for more than three (3) consecutive times without a reasonable excuse After the absence of three (3) consecutive meetings, the remaining trustees of the Library Board shall vote to retain or recommend to the City Council that the absentee trustee be relieved of his duties on the Board Section 2-7-8 Duties /mak A The Board, through the City Manager, shall recommend regulations and policy for the governing, control and improvement of the Apache Junction Library. B The Board may interview, evaluate and recommend to the City Council the best qualified applicant for the position of Library Director from those candidates provided by the Personnel Officer. C To submit annually to the City Council by the first Monday in July an overall evaluation of the Library } system 1 SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS r_ All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional } by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Ordinance No. 149 Page Two of Three Aar PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 1982 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. XCity-,,Lorney`4�y L Ordinance No. 149 Page Three of Three ITEM NO . 3 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO , 149 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING . PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 150 ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE OF THE LIBRARY 2, THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY MANAGER 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5, IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC . QACHE {gY V b. d r ., 3 Z r LON �Z 3Y:R. 7uche 2unct on �'�� 't' U� July 15 , 1982 MEMORANDUM TO• HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUCNIL FROM: \ CITY MANAGER SUBJECT PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 150 - OFFICE OF THE LIBRARY Chapter 3 of the City Code sets forth rules and guidelines for the administration of the city, including the various departments and offices , however, it does not include the newly-created "office of the library. " Proposed Ordinance No . 150 establishes the Office of the Library and sets forth the duties of the Library Director. The Library Director will be responsible for the overall operation of the Library and will be required to report to the city manager, as are all other department and office heads . The Library Board has reviewed the proposed ordinance and their recommended changes have been included in the final draft. J. James Tuvell, Jr. City Manager !� Approver for Agenda Pee Item # : :: g ding � � .../_,_..____ Y_ Old f,z,:stness New Susmess 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 ORDINANCE NO 150 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE CHAPTER 3 ADMINISTRATION, BY ADDING ARTICLE 3-11 OFFICE OF THE LIBRARY, SECTIONS 3-11-1 THROUGH 3-11-4, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING - PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS SECTION I IN GENERAL Article 3-11 Office of the Library 3-11-1 Office Established 3-11-2 Duties of Library Director 3-11-3 Vacancies Section 3-11-1 Office Established A The office of the Library of the City of Apache Junction is hereby created and established It shall consist of the Library Director who shall be the chief administrator of the office and all other employees assigned thereto All other employees shall perform their duties subject to the supervision of the Library Director who shall operate under the - - guidance and direction of and report directly to the City Manager The Library Director shall supervise his office in accordance with the applicable personnel ordinances and shall exercise such powers and perform IL such duties as are required by this code, applicable ordinances, resolution or lawful directives B Appointment and Compensation The position of the Library Director is hereby declared as classified service and he shall be appointed and removed by the City Council subject to recommendation of the City Manager and the Library Board, and shall serve and receive such compensation as shall be determined in accordance with the applicable personnel ordinance Section 3-11-2 Duties of Library Director A The Library Director shall Retain all duties and responsibilities assigned by this code, law or ordinance and shall abide by those set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes §9-411 through 9-420 B Consult with the president of the Library Board as to the items to be included on the agenda of meetings for said Board prior to the preparation and distribution of the agenda by the Library Director The Library Director, if requested by any board members, shall include on the agenda any item requested by said board member C Prepare and distribute the official minutes of all Library Board meetings D Consult with the Library Board and City Manager on the establishment of all policies and procedures including, but not limited to library hours, general standards of service, book selection, policy, and fees Ordinance No 150 Page One of Three ORS E. Administer and operate existing library facilities and programs and plan for the development and operation of proposed facilities and programs in accordance with policies set by lawful directives of the Library Board and the City Council 6fti F Make recommendations to the City Manager, with the .y` 4assistance of the Library Board, for the annual budget for submittal to the City Council. ttr I G. Inform the general public of the services and �1 facilities being provided by the office of the Library, address professional civic and lay groups on related subjects, solicit suggestions from the general public on increasing the effectiveness of programs, cooperate with governmental and voluntary organizations and agencies in the solving of related problems, provide, upon request, assistance of a technical nature to community agencies and organizations on problems related to library facilities and programs H Assist community organizations in the promotion of library services, conduct studies of local conditions and needs for such services, assist with the recruit- ment and training of professional library personnel and volunteer leaders I Upon request, advise the Council, the Library Board and community organizations concerning the expenditure of public funds for the library, acquisitions, design and development of facilities, and shall maintain effective and cooperative relations with all City officials, state and federal agencies and with local, state and national voluntary organizations. Section 3-11-3 Vacancies In case that the office of the Library Director shall become vacant for any reasons, the City Council shall appoint a successor based upon recommendations by the City Manager and Library Board Section II REPEALING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and part of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitu- tional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF r_ APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 1982 Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk Ordinance No 150 Page Two of Three APPROVED AS TO FORM City A or y t /ft, Ordinance No. 150 Page Three of Three ITEM NO. 4 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO , 150 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING , PUBLIC HEARING 1, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 153 ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA 2. THIS AGENDA ITEM HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY MANAGER 3, THE DIRECTOR MAY SPEAK REGARDING THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME, 4, ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE? 5. IF NO ONE WISHES TO SPEAK, THIS HEARING IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC , •; ru'rr-r for Agenda f>� (SAC_HF✓GDate Item # j, ' -.1-1-111,3 -01..4 ...5.-- '' r ` : !4e;. 4 1. ] .,l.�T s a r .( ?< .iinr3 ,---"------::)? L;. ,1ca5 'IRszccAP cOitj 4 &4packe g mctian July 15, 1982 .r MEMORANDUM TO HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM. CITY MANAGER SUBJECT• ? \:)..ji \ , PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 153 - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO COUNCIL ORDER OF BUSINESS In accordance with Council requests , research has been done on the possibility of adopting a consent agenda format for regular city council meetings . While performing the research, the City Clerk discovered that there were several other items contained in Article 2-4, Section 2-4-6 Order of Business , which were either inaccurate or perhaps no longer necessary. Proposed Ordinance No . 153 amends this entire section of the City Code and brings it in line with the procedures that the Council has been following for approximately the last three years . As an example, Subsection 2-4-6 (G) presently states that "new business" shall include the first reading of ordinances or resolutions . These items , however, are re- quired to have a public hearing and have always been and should be considered separately. The Consent Agenda has been added under Subsection C. If adopted, this will eliminate the need for separate motions on items not requiring a public hearing such as the acceptance of minutes and the agenda, second readings , etc . A councilman will still be able to pull an item from the consent agenda and open it for discussion if so desired. "Reports By Officers" has been retitled "Report By City Manager" and has been more clearly defined. A subsection entitled "Public Hearings" has been added and defined. The subsection entitled "New Business" has been revised to bring it in line with the procedure that this council and the pre- vious council has been following. The Code presently contains a subsection (H) entitled "Claims . " Under this subsection, the Council is required to approve or 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Proposed Ordinance No . 153 Page 2 disapprove all claims or demands payable to the city on an individual basis . The interim city council first to hold office in 1978-1979 was the only council to follow this procedure. The later council did not adhere to an in- dividual claims report since each check was signed by at least one council member and purchases exceeding a certain amount required prior council approval . Since this �. practice has not been followed and would create a considerable burden if such a report was prepared for review, the ordinance has been revised to eliminate it. The city attorney and the League of Arizona Cities and Towns have advised us that there is no statutory requirement for such a report . It should also be noted that the requirement of council approval on all checks would delay our payments to vendors by as much as three weeks and could effect our payment record and credit rating. The balance of the ordinance has only been revised to clarify the text and bring it in line with the procedures that have been followed at council meetings . If additional information is required, please contact either the city clerk or myself. J . James Tuvell, Jr. City Manager kmc 00. ORDINANCE NO. 153 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE 2-4 COUNCIL PROCEDURE, SECTION 2-4-6 ORDER OF BUSINESS; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDING /'* I FOR SEVERABILITY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT, SECTION I IN GENERAL That Article 2-4 COUNCIL PROCEDURE, Section 2-4-6 ORDER OF BUSINESS, be amended to read as follows; Section 2-4-6 Order of Business The business of the Council shall be taken up for consideration and disposition in the following order A. Call to Order. The mayor shall take the chair precisely at the hour appointed for the meeting and shall immediately call the Council to order In the absence of the mayor, the vice mayor shall call the Council to order. In the absence of both the mayor and vice mayor, the clerk shall call the Council to order and an acting mayor shall be selected to chair the meeting. Upon arrival of the mayor or the vice mayor, the vice mayor or the acting mayor shall immediately relinquish the chair upon the conclusion of the business immediately before the Council The mayor shall preserve order and decorum, decide all questions of order and conduct the proceedings of the meetings in accordance with the parliamentary rules contained in Robert's Rules of Order unless otherwise specified. A parliamentarian may be appointed by the Council to be present at all regular meetings. B Roll Call. Before proceeding with the business of the Council, the clerk or his deputy shall call the roll of the members, and the names of those present shall be entered in the minutes. If r1 a quorum is not present, the members present may adjourn pursuant to Section 2-4-4 of this code C Consent Agenda The Council may, at this time, take single action on any or all items listed as consent agenda items These items may include, but are not limited to acceptance of agenda, acceptance of minutes, second readings of ordinances, acceptance of resignations, and adoption of certain resolutions and other items which do not require a public hearing. D. Minutes If not included as a consent agenda item, the clerk or deputy clerk shall read or present the minutes of the preceding Council meeting which shall be approved if correct Any error noted shall be corrected and initialed by the City Clerk E. Petitions. Petitions, remonstrances,communications and comments or suggestions from citizens present shall be heard by the Council. All such remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. Such remarks shall be limited to five minutes unless additional time is granted by the Council All speakers must submit to the mayor or clerk a written request to speak in advance of each meeting Where one group wishes to present comments or discussion, one person from the group shall be designated to present said continents or discussion. No person other than the individual speaking shall enter into the discussion without permission of the presiding officer No question shall be asked a councilman except through the presiding officer ORDINANCE NO. 153 PAGE ONE OF THREE / "Call to the Public" items will be considered at this time F Report by City Manager. The City Manager, members of the City staff or those individuals designated by the Manager may present information pertinent to items under consideration, or information related to the operation of the City. G. Public Hearings. Public hearings required by City ordinance, state statute or federal regulations shall be conducted and all interested parties given the opportunity to speak Public hearings shall be conducted on all zoning ordinances, abandon- ments, street light improvement districts, proposed revenue sharing uses, adoption of budget and other items as required by law H Old Business. The Council shall consider any business that has been previously considered and which is still unfinished to include those items previously tabled I New Business. The Council shall consider any business not heretofore considered including, but not limited to acceptance of resignations, adoption of those resolutions not requiring a public hearing, consideration of contracts, award of bids, appointments to boards and commissions, and establishment of work sessions and executive sessions Council liaison reports, and committee reports as required by the Council shall be presented at this time J Miscellaneous Business (Requests of Council). Prior to adjournment, the Council shall, as it deems necessary, consider such business as not specifically provided for herein K Adjournment The Council may, by a majority vote of those IL present, adjourn at the conclusion of business A motion to adjourn shall always be in order and decided without debate SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is for any reasons held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof - PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 1982 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ORDINANCE NO 153 PAGE TWO OF THREE ATTEST �\f Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: \V„.%;..\, City Attorney I /11%. ORDINANCE NO. 153 PAGE THREE OF THREE is ITEM NO , 5 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ ORDINANCE NO , 153 BY TITLE ONLY FOR THE FIRST READING , r4 PQACHF✓, ,,,i k.,,!-,,,,. 0. UG.eRR„ryry[^^:fall ' Z fi'. gR/Z40NP `Oity o &471ache o unction July 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO" THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: 'y JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: JOE GERO, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOLUTION 82-48 Resolution 82-48 declares as public documents those elements of the proposed Apache Junction general plan on file in the City Clerk's office. Prior to holding the public hearing, the City Council should consider Resolution 82-48, which would declare the general plan and attached studies as public documents. This action does not require public hearing. Recommended Motion: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Resolution 82-48, a resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache ,Junction, Arizona, declaring as public documents those certain documents on file with the City Clerk and entitled "Apache Junction: 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona" be and hereby is adopted." Approver for Agenda et Item First R.sailing 7 t3 --. Second Readt;;g -- ..✓Pibi:c i•icering .. Old Business .-- ... New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 RESOLUTION NO 82-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS PUBLIC DOCUMENTS THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON FILE WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED "APACHE i JUNCTION: 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN," "A TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR APACHE JUNCTION," "WATER SYSTEMS EVALU- ATION FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA," "SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA," "POPULATION ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA," AND "CITY COMPLEX PLANNING PROGRAM, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA." BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that 1 That certain document entitled "Apache Junction: 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan" as recommended amended by the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission on June 29, 1982, three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Apache Junction, Arizona, and containing 106 pages being five pages of Title, Table of Contents and Credits and six chapters numbered 1-1 through 1-20, 2-1 through 2-54, 3-1 through 3-4, 4-1 through 4-8, 5-1 through 5-10, and 6-1 through 6-5 is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk 2 That certain document entitled "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction" three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Apache Junction, Arizona, and containing 57 pages numbered 1 through 49, plus four (4) introductory pages and four (4) pages of Appendix is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk. 3 That certain document entitled "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona" three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Apache Junction, Arizona, and containing 100 pages as follow: four (4) Title and Contents pages, chapter pages 1-1 through 1-3, 2-1 through 2-8, 3-1 through 3-28, 4-1 through 4-14, 5-1 through 5-17, 6-1 through 6-6, and Appendix pages numbered A-1, B-1 through B-4, C-1 and C-2, D-1, plus four pages, E-1, plus four pages and F-1 through F-3, plus two maps in pocket folders is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk 4. That certain document entitled "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona" three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Apache Junction, Arizona, and containing 139 pages as follow: four (4) Title and Contents pages, chapter pages 1-1 through 1-3, 2-1 through 2-9, 3-1 through 3-16, 4-1 through 4-16, 5-1 through 5-32, 6-1 through 6-24, 7-1 through 7-5, and Appendix pages numbered A-1, B-1 through B-6, C-1 and C-2, D-1, plus 18 pages, E-1 through E-3 is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk 5. That certain document entitled "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona" three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Apache Junction, Arizona, and containing 29 pages numbered 1 through 24 and two (2) pages of Title and Contents and three (3) pages of Appendix is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO 82-48 PAGE TWO F�r 6 That certain document entitled "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona" three (3) copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk of Apache Junction, Arizona, and con- 11/4 taming sixteen (16) unnumbered pages is hereby declared to be a public record, and said copies are ordered to remain on file with said City oftik Clerk. 1 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 19 . Wendell J Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Da � nder Civity Attorney 1 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES g ..... 61) (6)9 ITEM # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY: SECONDED BY: )t)677-44A--- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNC I LMAN HUDSON 7 COUNCILMAN EIDSON //, COUNCILMAN SHAH KS VICE_MAYOR HILL V COUNCILMAN DAMIANO I/ MAYOR CLARKE (/ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH UNANPy S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO . 6 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, TAT RESOLUTION NO . 82-48, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS PUBLIC DOCUMENTS THOSE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON FILE WITH THE CITY CLERK AND ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION : 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, " "A TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR APACHE JUNCTION, " "WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " "SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " "POPULATION ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " AND "CITY COMPLEX PLANNING PROGRAM, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED AND ADOPTED . ... .•. P4ACHF i t O U(--- - ,, Z �R,zONjP c 0 ity on iliache unction July 13, 1982 Ameba MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ,tg, BY JOE GERO, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM - GENERAL PLAN JULY 20, 1982 Background At the September 12, 1979, City Council meeting, the staff was instructed to begin pursuing certain studies and to seek Four Corners Regional Commission (FCRC) funding. In discussion with the FCRC staff, it was sug- gested a grant to prepare a general plan be sought. The FCRC grant was subsequently approved. Studies covering the following areas were prepared by consultant services: *Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona *Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona *Transportation Plan for Apache Junction *Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona In addition, a separate contract was approved to prepare a City Complex plan. Two sixty-day notice periods have occurred being November 19, 1981 , to January 18, 1982 and April 28, 1982, to June 28, 1982. The notice complies with ARS § 461.05 (F) with copies of the proposal being sent to: Approver for Agenda. ._....r Maricopa Association of Governments 9 Central Arizona Association of Governments �{�"' #t 7/�First Reading i� Second Reading . . ... ..........._ ✓ Pu:,Iic Ho ring Ci..1 Busm.ess New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 REQUEST FOR AGENDAA.TEM - GENERAL PLAN (July 20, 19z1 July 13, 1982 Page Two Maricopa County Planning Commission Pinal County Planning Commission City of Mesa State Land Department Phoenix District Office, Bureau of Land Management Maricopa County Flood Control District Office of Economic Planning and Development Copies of the proposal are on file in the city library, City Clerk's office, Chamber of Commerce, and Planning Department for public review. As requested, copies have been made available to the public. The staff has conducted numerous public meetings, including meeting with special interest groups to answer inquiries and to present an overview of the proposal . The required advertisements have been posted and put in the newspapers. Written Comments The following persons or agencies have submitted letters to the city of Apache Junction regarding the draft proposed general plan: (Copies attached. ) A. Arizona State Land Department - Robert K. Lane, Acting State Land Commissioner B. The Honorable James Karam, Jr. - Pinal County District 2 Supervisor C. Central Arizona Association of Governments - Phillip E. Goldsberry, Regional Planning Director D. Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission - Phil Hogue, Chairman Terry L. Smith, Planning Director E. Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce - Jan Hiller, President F. William A. Beaulieu G. Flood Control District of Maricopa County - William Mathews, P.C. Chief Engineer and General Manager H. City of Mesa, Planning and Community Development - Wayne Balmer, Assistant Planning Director I. Maricopa County Department of Planning and Development - Don McDaniel , Director, by Dudley Onderdonk, Principal Planner Advance Planning Division J. Arizona Department of Transportation - Art Averback, Chief Regional Planner, by Ronn Edwards, Regional Planner and Dale Buskirk K. Bureau of Land Management, Phoenix District Office - Robert Archibald, Jr. , Area Manager, Phoenix Resource Area L. Clara Carney by Clay Worst (Power of Attorney submitted) REQUEST FOR AGENDA►TTEM - GENERAL PLAN (July 20, 1ioda2) July 13, 1982 Page Three M. Certain citizens of Pinal County by Jim Swanson N. Roadhaven Resorts Inc. - 0. Beulah Matthews P. Donald K. Cox Q. Dean Sloan - Mesa Public Works Manager R. Larry White and others Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission at a special meeting on June 29, 1982, unanimously (6-0) adopted the following motion: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Apache Junction 2001: Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan, also known as Resolution No. 82-1, be recommended for approval by the Apache Junction City Council with the following amendments: 1) Rewording of Section 16 paragraph per State Land Department recommendation. (Note: See letter dated June 25, 1982 - Robert Lane, Acting Commissioner,) 2) Land Use Map changes as indicated in the Commission packets (generally housecleaning measures for zoning that already exists) . 3) Indicate "Local Commercial Opportunity Area by Planned Development" for the node on Broadway Avenue and San Marcos Drive. " Three persons spoke on the proposed plan with no negative comment on the proposal . City Council Consideration Resolution No. 82-48 establishes the general plan and attached studies as public documents. Resolution 82-1 has been drafted for the purpose of seeking consideration for adoption of a city general plan. Adoption of the resolution would accomplish the following: 1. Adopt that certain document "Apache Junction 2001: Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan" as the city general plan and by implication recommend to Pinal County officials and others their consideration of the study area outside the city limits. 2. Adopt those certain documents "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona" as part of the general plan. Previously, the City Council has adopted the "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona. " In order to make application for the city hall site from the State Land Department, the city must adopt and present its development plan. 3. Accepts the reports "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," and "Transportation Plan for Apache Junction " for reference only. REQUEST FOR AGENDA TM - GENERAL PLAN (July 20, 19 , July 13, 1982 Page Four 4. Directs the Planning and Zoning Commission to annually inspect the general plan and present to the City Council a status report and recommendations. On any of the above reports prior to consideration of the resolution, the City Council may adopt certain amendments. Consideration of the resolution would then include the documents as amended. There appear to be several areas yet to be resolved but such determination is minor in nature. Those areas are: 1. Determine whether or not to increase the density level as requested by Roadhaven Resorts. (See their letter and map. ) 2. Any other minor map amendments staff identifies as complying with existing zoning. Suggested Motion Resolution No. 82-48 "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Resolution 82-48 a resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, declaring as public documents those certain documents on file with the City Clerk and entitled "Apache Junction: 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona, " be and hereby is adopted. " Resolution No. 82-1 "BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that Resolution 82-1, a resolution of the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, adopting the Apache Junction, Arizona, general plan entitled "Apache Junction: 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," which includes, but is not limited to, a land use element, sewage disposal alternatives, water systems analysis, a circulation (transportation) plan, and a Section 16 master plan; and accepts as reference the reports "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona;" and adopts as part of the general plan documents entitled "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona," be and hereby is adopted. " RESOLUTION NO. 82-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN," WHICH INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, A LAND USE ELEMENT, SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES, WATER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, A CIRCULATION (TRANSPORTATION) PLAN, AND A SECTION 16 MASTER PLAN; AND ACCEPTS AS REFERENCE THE REPORTS "A TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR APACHE JUNCTION," "WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR APACHE JUNC- TION, ARIZONA," "SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA," AND ADOPTS AS PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN THE DOCUMENTS ENTITLED "POPULATION ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA," AND "CITY COMPLEX PLANNING PROGRAM, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA " WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of § 9-461, Arizona Revised Statutes, each planning agency (Planning and Zoning Commission) shall prepare and the legislative body of the municipality (City Council) shall adopt a comprehensive, long-range general plan for the development of the municipality; and WHEREAS, there is substantial state lands within several adjacent miles of Apache Junction, and the Arizona State Legislature did pass the Urban Lands Bill which places additional responsibility on local govern- mental agencies to plan the future development of the urban state lands, and WHEREAS, the coordination of services in the Apache Junction area requires the cooperation of Apache Junction and Pinal County officials, and Pinal County officials do request the recommendation of the various cities on rezoning and subdivision applications within three miles of the municipal limits, and WHEREAS, through a grant obtained with the assistance of Governor Bruce Babbitt from the Four Corners Regional Commission, certain studies on water, sewage disposal, and transportation have been performed to provide a data base and also to identify areas needing further long-term study; and WHEREAS, the general plan has been prepared by the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission with the assistance of a Land Use Plan Committee after much diligent study and investigation, and WHEREAS, the proposed general plan has been properly advertised and distributed and public hearings, as required by the Arizona Revised Statutes, have been held, and WHEREAS, the general public has been afforded the opportunity to comment on the proposed plan, those comments receiving dutiful consider- ation, and 1 r s,- WHEREAS, the Arizona Revised Statutes do provide an amendment process to adopted general plans, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, as follows. 1 That certain document entitled "Apache Junction 2001, Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan," is hereby adopted and approved as the general plan of the city of Apache Junction, Arizona 2 Those certain documents entitled "Population Analysis for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona," and "City Complex Planning Program, City of Apache Junction, Arizona" are hereby adopted in concept by reference as part of the general plan of the city of Apache Junction, Arizona. RESOLUTION NO 82-1 PAGE TWO 3. Those certain reports entitled "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona," and "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction" are hereby accepted as part of the data documentation and made a part of the general plan. Acceptance of the reports does not necessarily imply agreement with the egiN recommendations contained therein. 4 The Apache Junction City Council hereby requests and directs the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission to submit a status report to the City Council prior to the first day of February of each yeear, including any proposals for amend- ment of the general plan 5 The Apache Junction City Council hereby requests that Pinal County officials adopt the Apache Junction general plan as an amendment to the Pinal County general plan, including those areas where recommendations have been made outside the Apache Junction city limits, but in Pinal County 6 The Apache Junction City Council hereby requests the Arizona State Land Department and the Bureau of Land Management to fully consider this general plan in making decisions which affect lands under their authority and which are located within the general plan study area BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forward certified copies of this resolution to the Governor of the State, U S Secretary of the Interior,Commissionerofthe Arizona Land Department, Director of the Phoenix Office of the Bureau of Land Manage- ment, Arizona Congressional Delegation, and the Arizona State Delegation representing this area. PASSED THIS DAY OF , 19 , BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Davi Alexander City Attorney 1 Am. v NARRATIVE TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO O � CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE RELATIVE TO DISCUSSIONS ON THE CITY MASTER PLAN SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 29 , 1982 . This Narrative is provided by Roadhaven Resorts, Inc. , as the owner and developer of a 50 acre recreational vehicle resort known as Apache Junction Recreational Vehicle Resort (the "Resort" ) located at 1000 South Idaho Road. Roadhaven Resorts also owns approximately 45 acres of vacant land (the "Effected Land" ) which is adjacent to and is located immediately to the 17est of the Resort. Under the proposed 2001 Land Use Map (the "Master Plan" ) the Resort is designated as high density residential and the Effected Land is planned for medium density residential . For the reasons set forth below, Roadhaven Resorts solicits your consideration for having the Effected Land designated as residential high density rather than medium density, as presently proposed under the Master Plan. Since obtaining zoning and subdivision approval for the .•. Resort, Roadhaven Resorts has been wrking on proposed development plans for the Effected Land. It is presently proposed that the eastern most 10 acres of the Effected Land be developed into a golf course , which will be open to the public. The further 3 acres of the eastern most portion of the Effected Land has already been donated by Roadhaven Resorts to Palm Springs Water Company for purposes of developing a water treatment punt to process and distribute CAP water within its franchise area , including areas located within the City of Apache Junction . Obtaining a suitable site for this water treatment plant was critical for Palm Springs • Company in order to enable it to serve new development in the Apache Junction area pending resolution of CAP allocations at a federal level. The balance of the land, approximately 32 acres is located between the golf course and water treatment plant and the existing Resort. Roadhaven Resort proposes that the balance of the land be developed as an extension of the existing Resort. After installing improvements, streets and open areas, there would be approximately 20 acres available for large recreational vehicle lots. The street plan for the existing Resort is such that a recreational vehicle on the Effected Land could easily be integrated into the existing Resort. With a golf course bounding the entire project on the East, we belive that the appearance of the area as a whole will be integrated and enhanced. As we understand it, the present proposed medium density zoning for the Effected Land would require 3 , 500 square feet of family dwelling lots. If the Master Plan were amended to permit high density, we understand the property could be developed into 2 , 000 square foot lots . As an extension of the existing Resort, we .-. propose to continue the concept of large recreational lots . Both designated as high density , because of the nature of the industry , the average number of people per lot will not exceed 2 (and these 2 are invariably adults so that there is no impact on school enroll- ment) and occupancy is predominately during the winter months . Con- sequently, while designated high density , the impact upon city services should not significantly exceed, if at all , the impact if the property remained zoned for medium density and the property was developed as a typical family residential development . -2- We respectfully request consideration be given to our proposal. Attached hereto is a rough diagram showing the existing Resort and the Effected Land and its proposed use. If there is a mechanism whereby our proposal can be implemented, the area ' s resort appearance can be sustained while enhancing the community ' s recrea- tional facilities at no cost to the community. -3- A � N o D �✓ I r Tt-.es3144-n1L Al' TERRY L.SMITH yyyy' pti PHIL C HOGUE Director �1 -4Qr Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission r`r'9 ■w v. Pinal Countya .' Post Office Box D • Florence, Arizona 85232 Telephone(602)868 5801,Ext 446 JUN 2 5 1982 June 24, 1982 DEPT. OF PLANNING Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ATTN: Mr. Joe Gero, Director Dear Mr. Gero, In May, 1982, this Department received a copy of the amended proposed Apache Junction General Plan. I have read the proposed changes and concur with your Commission's recommendation. Therefore, on behalf of the Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission, it is recommended the amendments be accepted and be made part of the proposed General Plan. .-. Very truly yours, ckt Terry Smith, Director PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT TLS:kh L E oN AL co CENTRAL ARIZONA ASSOCIATION P tir,� OF GOVERNMENTS 1810 MAIN ST v4111P 0 DRAWER J1 v FLORENCE,AZ 85232 PHONE(602)868 5878 .-s g g [l e•• JOHN A.BLACKBURN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 44.G10 JUN 2 1982 N DEPT. OF PLAivc June 29, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Chairman Baljo, The CAAG staff, as requested, has reviewed the proposed amendment to the Apache Junction general plan. It is the opinion of the staff that the amendments proposed strengthen the plan beyond the scope of its form when previously reviewed by this office. While no document of a magnitude such as that of the Apache Junction general plan can foresee every eventuality relating to city development, this plan, as it has developed, certainly goes a very long distance toward establishing a framework for future growth and development of the community. All parties involved in the development of the general plan are to be commended. Please advise if we can be of any further service. Sincerely, z 2 y Phil Goldsberry Regional Planning Director PG:da GILA COUNTY GLOBE,HAYDEN MIAMI PAYSON SAN CARLOS 'WINKELMAN PINAI COUNTY APACHE JUNCTION CASA GRANDE COOLIDGE [LOY,FLORENCE KEARNY MAMMOTH SUPERIOR 44) a P.C . Eox 2120 Apache Junction, Prizona 85220 I• arch 15, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 r,orth Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Commission I embers: Pertaining to your further considerations regarding the land-use plan, the Superstition Horsemen' s Association would like to make the following statements and recommendations: The Association essentially supports the land-use plan prior to its being amended. However, in the spirit of compromise, we feel that there are areas of greater or lesser concern to horse owners and those who desire an open-space life style. If the Commission feels that changes must be made to increase the density of the central corridor (defined as that area bordered on the north by Superstition Drive, on the south by Broadway Road, on the west by Meridian, and on the east by Idaho Road ) it is hoped that these changes will be made on the basis of intelligent city planning and reliable water and sewage disposal data. Regarding the residential areas bordered on the ,... north by Lost Dutchman Blvd . , the south by High- way 80, the west by Tomahawk, and the east by Golc.field Road , as well as the land cesignated as Area I on the land-use map, the Association wishes to strongly recommend that those lands be developed on a low-density, one-acre-minimum basis. Furthermore, we would ask the Commission to exercise the utmost caution when dealing with other areas within the city which include horse properties, so as not to create incompatible situations. Thank you for your consideration in these matters. Sine)erelycr, Jim Swanson, Chairman Superstition Horsemen' s Association 6+ j F �. 1703 W. Auburn Mesa, Arizona 85201 February 4, 1982 Mayor and Council Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mayor and Council: I was much surprised to hear on TV Channel 3 News that you were considering outlawing horses in town. Please do not let this happen. I do not live in Apache Junction and do not have a horse. What I do have is some land in town which I am holding for retirement. I feel that the value of nv land would go down if restrictions were nade. There are so few decent country type towns left in Arizona without high-rises and traffic tie-ups. Let's keep Apache Junction just the way it is, horses and all. Thank you for hearing my opinion and please vote "AO" on doing away with horses. Sincerely, Beulah B. Matthews (Mrs. John R.) pm t �-+ �. .s r.� L-s !c,o p Lawrence R. White 1`381 South Idaho Road Apache Junction, Az 85220 March• 1o, 1982 AN OPEN LETTER TO: The Mayor and City Council of Apache Junction The Planning and Zoning Commision The undersigned rroperty owners representing that strip of land immediately east of Idaho Rd. would like to express their ... support for revision of the Apache Junction Master Plan designating inter-city land as preferred medium zoning. This proposal was addressed during the Planning and Zoning Commissions meeting on February 1', 1982, and was rrefaced by tor. Joe Gero's suggestion and explanation of the special use permit. The special use permit and medium density designation would enhance the Commission' s flexibility in pursuing logical development tih d enable a more homogeneous land use to evolve . At present, both the Commission and the City Council are faced with a "patch work quilt" plan of high, medium and low density parcels allowing for everything from office buildings to goat farming within our city residential area. It appears evident that Apache Junctlon is destined to develop and prosper. We feel the adoption of these recommendations are imperative prerequisites to future courses of action in establishing a logical development pattern. Signature Address :=1-- -._ . .,_ ...e6Z . lig-rj .)--24 * 41. I r tee,"&u,.). A A..... �- fdf-ei / 93.s 44/ , v.l 9 - r / 9: ,. 1,..-- ,r /1,7 , „;, , / 73 / S. a. o k c/, 8.J . ,y,„„:„A 4,,, z,."2,.,,j,,,' Va4,d-p . i 6-7g / a X- d 2-,----,-4=7 (. -z=y_cx_ z__ id- �.� //,, �� ,-Olti, �, ./9 d FILE COPY 12423 E. Doucletree Ranch Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85259 February 2, 1982 FEB 4 ;;;,_ .-. Joe Gero Director of Planning 1001 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Gero: I recently saw the Land Use Map for the City of Apache Junction and must say I was quite surprised. I own the five acre parcel on the northwest corner of Plaza Drive and Superstition Elvd . I had hoped to make available small buildinR lots at this location for commercial development which r,,ould provide more setvices to the community. I feel that small businessmen would be encouraged to develop their interests if more property were available to them. The unavailability of commercial property could retard the growth and development of the city . It seems to me that ueneral Rural Zcnin. for the above mentioned property is unrealistic. The corner of Plaza Drive and Superstition L1Yd. is surely, destined to become an extremely busy intersection. I can see the zonin: of General Rural as being an obstacle to the future of this key area. I s'ncerely hope the _lanning and Zonin'- Commission will rec:.nsider their plans for w.at appears to be t e business district of the City of Apa c:e Junct_ on. The lev-al des cri_ation of rn� oropert,) is : S SF -Sig, SF� Section 17, Towns'nip 1 'orth, ran 7e 8 -east, CL RB&H. Sincerely, 59:e5-11-14-11- Yrj Donald K. Cox cc : Yildred a.her tiendell Clare Leo :r- zier 122L23 E. Doubletree Ranch Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85259 February 2, 1982 Leo Frazier, Jr. Zoning Administrator 1001 N. Ida bo Rd. Apache Junction, , rizona. 85220 Dear Mr. Frazier: I recently saw the Land Use yap for the City of Apache Junction and must saJ I was cuite surprised. I own the five acre parcel on to northwest corner of Plaza Drive and Superstition Blvd. I had hoped to make available small building lots at this location for commercial development which would provide more ser-..ices to the community. I feel that small businessmen would be encouraged to develop their interests if more property were available to them. The unavailability of commercial property could retard the growth and development of the city. It seems to me that General Rural Zoning for tre above mentioned property is unrealistic. The corner of Plaza OIS Drive and Superstition Blvd . is surely destined to become an extremely busy intersection. I can see the zoning of General Rural as being an obstacle to t'r.e future of this key area. I sincerely hope tr_e Plannin and Zonin Comr:icsion will reconsider their plans for -at eopears to be the business district of t:e City of tpache Junction. The 1 `al d :scritit_ .,n of mj :oropert .V is: S STSWSZ , Section 17, To:~ns-i o 1 Nortn, ran2e 8 7ast, Gf SRB&I;. Sincerely, Donald K. Cox cc: Joe Gero ;ande1l Clarke : i l:r d Baker 12423 E. Doubletree Ranch Road Scottsdale, Arizona 85259 February 2, 1982 AEI 1 19C2 en Ms. Mildred Baker, Chairman Plannin- and Zoning Commission 1001 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 • Dear Ms . Baker: I recently saw the Land Use Map for the City of Apache Junction and must say I was quite surprised. I own the five acre parcel on the northwest corner of Plaza Drive and Superstition Blvd . I nad hoped to make available small building lots at this location for commercial development which would provide more services to the community. I feel that small businessmen would be encouraged to develop their interests if more property were available to them. The unavailability of commercial property could retard the growtri and development of t:e city. It seems to me that General Rural Zonin7, for the above mentioned property is unrealistic. Trecorner of Plaza Drive and Superstition Elvd. is surely destined to become an extremely busy intersection. I can see the zoning of GeneralRural as bein`, an obstacle to the future of this key area. I sincerely hope tr_e Planning and Zonin : Commission will reconsider their plans for what appears to be the business district of the City of Apache Junction. The le7al description of m propert is : S S�LS T'.S 4, Section 17, Townsl-ip 1 : orth, Range 8 East, c SRBL.M. Sircerel� , Donald K. Cox cc: Joe 'era Leo 7razier send el 1. Cl:rz,e mpache,')undtwv 4 Tah P.O.Box 1747 Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 982-3141 January 19, 1982 i, 7 Mayor Wendell Clarke City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Az., 85220 Honorable Mayor Clarke: At a recent Board of Directors meeting of the Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce, Mr. Gero presented the future plans for growth and development of the Apache Junction area. After some discussion, it was determined that an orderly plan for growth and development is absolutely necessary —and the plan as prepared by PRC Toups, a plAnning research Company of Phoenix, Arizona and presented by Mr. Gero be adopted by the Apache Junction City Council. incerely, JH, rmf an Hiller, President Copy to Mr. Gero Apache Junction Chamber of Commerce (Ie t5'ul2,?, Taal `/Jltu„l1u4.L, T_ FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT bEC 2 1981 FLOOD CONTROL • p)s �c11 '._ of \°t " Maricopa County (,MkR!COPA BOARD of DIRECTORS couN1959\` 3335 West Durango Street • Phoenix, Arizona 85009 Tom Freestone, Chairman i.rm....---rL-- Telephone (602) 262-1501 Hawley Atkinson George L. Campbell William D Mathews, P E , Chief Engineer and General Manager Fred Koory, Jr Ed Pastor DECD 171981 �- Ms. Mildred Baker, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 RE: Apache Junction General Plan Dear Ms. Baker: We have reviewed the proposed general plan for the City of Apache Junction as requested in your letter dated November 19, 1981 . The following are our comments. The District recommends that the City adopt a drainage ordinance that requires all future development to at least maintain if not improve existing drainage conditions. In order to achieve this with urbanized development, it will be necessary to implement onsite stormwater runoff retention. Without retention, the increased runoff rates and volumes brought by urbanization will ultimately cause existing downstream drainage facilities to become inadequate for the original design frequency. As development approaches the proposed Superstition Freeway and the Central Arizona Project aqueduct, adequate consideration should be given to the drainage design frequency of those structures versus the drainage design of the future development. This will be especially significant for those developments upslope of the freeway and aqueduct. We appreciate your coordination with us. We hope to continue working together in the future as Apache Junction grows. Sincerely, --7itd,64.../ ` . b. W. D. Mathews , P. E. "IQ\ ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION / 206 South Seventeenth Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 BRUCE BABBITT Governor T; 1 0 1g82 February 2, 1982 F E^ WILLIAM A ORDWAY Director CHARLES D ANDERS Assistant Director v Mr / r• /t uli r G. Ray Lee FEB 4 1992 l I City Manager City of Apache Junction r. 1 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Lee: At your request we have reviewed "A Transportation Plan for Apache Junction. Our comments are as follows. 1 . Pg . 32 Access point at one mile and z mile roads only would be a highly desirable goal . 2. Pg. 33 Agreed. Right angle intersections would be desired, but realities will not permit that luxury. 3. Pg. 35 There is potential for long range benefit in routing SR 88 to Idaho Road however, any action which will add new mileage to the state highway system is faced with the realities of a very limited ADOT budget. Lack of ADOT action at this time should not inter- fere with the City designating and developing Idaho Road as an arterial street. 4. Pg. 37 A decision regarding disposition of the existing junction US 60 And SR 88 is dependent on the decision regarding possible rerouting of SR 88 to Idaho Road. 5. Pg. 38 No design of interchanges per se has been undertaken east of Power Road. Locations and type are as proposed in 1975. ADOT views these proposals as subject to reevaluation as conditions change. Sincerely, DALE BUSKIRK Senior Planner Transportation Planning Division DB•nq ` As P k HIGHWAYS • AERONAUTICS MOTOR VEHICLE • PUBLIC TRANSIT • ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE MEMO January 15, 1982 J4 TO: ART AUERBACH Chief Regional Planner FROM: RONN EDWARDS '. 'r ^ 't `1 Regional Planner �� �� SUBJECT: Review of Apache Junction Transportation Plan * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I have completed the review of the September, 1981 Transportation Plan for Apache Junction and have the following comments: (1 ) The plan does an adequate job of covering the basic elements of the transportation planning process. The plan promotes a balanced transportation system, addresses future transporta- tion needs, describes the existing system, considers safety conditions and discusses other modes of transportation including public transit, pedestrians, bicycles, horse trails, and air. (2) The plan does not address the elderly and handicapped. (3) One issue that you should be aware of that may create poten- tial conflict is the selection of arterial streets to be provided with an interchange along the Superstition Freeway. The Apache Junction plan suggests that interchanges be con- structed at Idaho and Tomahawk Roads as opposed to existing plans for interchanges at Ironwood and Tomahawk Roads. I would suggest that the District office and the Transportation Planning Division of the Arizona Department of Transportation �. be asked to submit comments on this issue. (4) Overall , the goals of the Apache Junction plan are compatible with those of the "Guide For Regional Development and Trans- portation." RONN EDWARDS t`8-9590 2/75 (f OSWERLY e.954) .... - PINAL COUNTY DISTRICT 2 S PIc VIISOL POST OFFICE BOX 827 FLORENCE,ARIZONA 85232 TELEPHONES JAMES J KARAM,JR OR FLORENCE 868-5801 "Jimmy" POST OFFICE BOX 248 SUPERIOR,ARIZONA 85273 SUPERIOR 689-5606 r: N 7:i . _!; Amok January 4, 1982 Honorable Wendell J. Clarke, Mayor City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Clark: Thank you for your letter of December 28, 1981 , as it related to your proposed general plan. Prior to the receipt of your plan, I went on a field trip with Mr. Gero and several others that were in attendance. Because of the trip I was rather familiar with the proposal . A copy was forwarded to Mr. Terry Smith, Director of Planning, for his comments, which have been mostly favorable. I , too, think the plan is great and see no immediate problems. Your Director, Mr. Gero, and your Council , are to be commended for such a fine and well thought out plan. As of now, if things do not change with me, I will be with you during your public hearing. Thanks for keeping me posted. Very ' cerely yours, --7-, { / / -i %T:✓n ':c '� ! � /James J. Karam 'Jr. , Superyisor 2,1NAL COUNTY-DISTRICT NO. 2 JJK:pe CC. Terry Smith, Planning & Zoning Director Bernie Minter, Highway Engineer fPHIL C.HOGUE TERRY L.SMITH ,p Director ,1�' Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Pinal County .,-% a^; 1.r"• Post Office Box D • Florence, Arizona 85232 r 1 Telephone(602)868 5801,Ext 446 ` s January 20, 1982 Mr. George Baljo, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Baljo, On behalf of the Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the fine presentation made regarding the proposed General Plan for the City of Apache Junction. Please accept the letter as an endorsement to your proposed General Plan and we hereby recommend the Plan be adopted by your Commission and City Council. Thank you for allowing us to review and comment on the well thought out plan. Sincerely, riN /kil C. Hogue, Chairman PINAL COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PCH.kh CC. Mr. James J. Karam, Jr. Supervisor, District No.2 CLTY OF MESA • ARIZONA 2 3 1982 • January 26, 1982 Mr. Joseph W. Gero Director of Planning City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mr. Gero: I received your letter regarding your master plan. We did not receive the attachments referred to in the letter. I 'm reasonably confident that we would have had no criticism of your proposed plan, however, it might be ad- visable for us to have a copy of the final plan for our information and we would appreciate receiving a copy at the proper time. I would like to bring up a related topic at this time. In recent discussions regarding transportation, and par- ticularly the extension of the Superstition Freeway, it was the consensus here that since it would be quite some time before the Superstition Freeway were extended through to US 60, that it would be very advantageous to extend one of the other arterial streets to provide an alternate route to Apache Trail . It was the consensus of the group that we consider pushing Maricopa County to extend Baseline Road to County Line if we could get Pinal County to consider opening Baseline Road to the east. It was thought that Apache Junction might be in a position to best influence Pinal County Supervisors on this matter. We would appreciate your thoughts on this idea. Sincerely, DEAN SLOAN Public Works Manager DES:jl s xc: Richard Broman, Public Works Director, Apache Junction - 111Y5.i \t)RTII t'I:\TI•R STRFI7 • POST(lill('P Rf1C 11i 11 • MF•�ni • t snot feLh_on J✓ Tf �-_ ° `"Apache Junclron Cuy lnnrlc u`' -_ ♦a♦a.te� 4R&tt1 Pl4MVR4*4****3* ********* 4*,******$*4* **********$$***4*4**4*4*** #4#4L#***4****4**4**4##( ......444++*..�f4+* 4...*****4****i•4k' '�. (i a aI _ I 0 * w Wndsong St o 1 '4 eE N ✓V Windsong St cc a * T W f•oolllit)St d W.Foothill St cc E Fond'It St Z Q ci o YWi= M _ W SntS kulaPe b tit r Fuur Peas Elementary ScAout E E a V ¢ U _ N I z Tapee St • w n'-Toa St E V C El1M1 rV I „ Rawhide IL. r; c . N V't _shlc p Rock St v u Shlprock Strs , Y V Q * tvla�Zanlla St o _ 1MMP Q cc 3 E Man;anlla St G M 3 ,Ti Z CI S o e-`'i— - / (y1H m ._,I____- W. HOunti a St. { E Roundup c 4 :W .� Muckult„d O! �p� _ fiP U Apach• Junction Gry Hall St 3 q a U3 z a o Esc ndldo Ct V� u a * I Coeds. w.at Si ltrmue. OOd c W Grewvt�nc,n.,SL I W, - MnP h o • Z . aHP ` Greasewood o rR Lucy ) I_ City Police .•..P o z v .'I' z Z W z Superstition - Z Blvd E Siesta St Z _._.� �f_._._.r o' . ._..t. .v �- -._ .._. N *4## W �liolla St o V ¢ v MNP W Ohio St o ° o'. A ., c ,� S,perst on'r o Cody St c o In gIt O a ! cc £ E Cody St iz. - m W_� T ( 1 > o Vlr Ir a SiI. E � + c 11 • c W Virginia St 8 U 9 k v E ? Vtryuue St m o f! a c W Sranir•St ,� m Z u Scenic Dr a z E r Sr aniL z �1 z = POST OFFICE Cactul . Wren St W.Belmar c a Z Z i E Cautus Wren st i a z—11—z Grenon N CI z St I c MItP k1H➢ SEEN IFF• - MHP 0 ) FIRE lc APT Z 'W Roosevelt ""z{Q-. r Z,t �Y •- • I„) L• , z Z amarlsk SI 4 Z E I �' Junction Dr P Apache F ail p 0 v LIBRARY D *� ° W c.1iL.i d�.�•6 t q U p ¢ ¢ - cc MHP E Second Ave ° U Q ° Mil _ 3 A AVb U / ,71 n J`d Av. S S _ o o a o o E MI j •.Y f'u v G ° ° ° ,-// R ��a apc.. U—a E 'O ii north ¢ nva t uurllT'—""A a U 1 1 ,r ° C) G O ° O Q fAVb N N .�......,i to MMF j, u1 2 .r 10 ro > °,uoentlt n p o a t] `9 ¢ _ i ¢ -p ; m rs P t,9W Sixth A t Srrtn.Avr of Muunfur m O M H.- ----+p c ; coa _> Seventh A MaP tri z a ° o ° rn a N__. d� U I to ° to 1 �' _ r M N Y a� !n -1011(wite y OJ I) __.,�_.^..._..a__._T' hVl CIA v- N.1 W ti,o,h Ayn Su ool Broadway a Ave . E N c di? II w rn ¢ E Ninth Ava ,j`11"' e - w .l. °(10111 Av U.� r0 MHP� Tnrah v ; o E Tnnih v Aru , m L e .4 14 3 o n—. L u E De5er1 1 Ave s m o y i U 1 w 12U Avr: . 5.��, ,V. 12th Ave — '— D E , t 2th Ave U IF alto Fargo Ave 2 � Esluvan¢ Ave 13th) y a - 11 A,W 13 JlAvu m c a .� c rn �. o a, Ave v'`E t�tn, a m > ui r_� E 0 .�Av (14th) in Ave e 3 m TsJ E Friar da Ave (15th) s �-N ` .N rn = t'._t7 bY.-1.41f,Ave d f 61 a1`a //� Y p E 15th 1.vn �? N ^ ° t0•`�•\ W Palomino Ave o.1aL 1(Ih Ave ¢. , ylO�do Ave /(loth) /�,/4 u p I II h N a -.►% 16th Ava. E o v 3 E N 161h Ava ,t• +y c Ave uc E 17th Ave , e t.��l W _ t71h Ave.J E. Kachlna`n • CS a o V.lthhn .°` ,$.. E undo o Ave {t9th Ln)t (16ut) t 0 NJ 4p 'w , 6 e, c0 m a y E Mosquito c 191h Ave 01 0 e� t:.,-"' o W 19thaae-l. '� 2 E. o a a E Montebello Ave (191h1,- v _., . y m O Q , w Q u �� 19th Ln c u 20th MttP Ave J ._. :Z � 1 ° 'w_ f IN rn .-< U to ,201h Ave c_ E Navalo Ave ml E U o 0 R/— R.. .L ° > w p u7 I 3 CC it a a� s C it� 1 11 _ Id Ai;i,t N o, Cl C 7 < M .. ar w �J'nul _eyy, (22nd) E Pnpparh wr Avu ,u LL —L_y < iT a .J111 Avu •a 2i-_ N F l)uall AveO '� c z c r a to Nl t7.:fuJt1Y>: ( 1 n „ L2 SW1LI, e �r r t e SN SuYUlultl Ave u1 _ .n 1 r r r • t •1 lr"n4.it�7)w cr __. *At44�M.f 4•!4.—rh.44.}a. .+.wg - e 1... - 1 W I I I q+ 1!1 t- lC O (ti ` L. l../ - 1\ ' r „) I x _... . t z �, > > t., AP ACHE FIC JUNCTION I UN I z 1 �' �/ i 1 ; I o 0 I- w I- a m 0 IL z f1UIi I I. C HOME PARK 1// �, S. T I T1" ..-Zr I v tt O 3 O Q Z 2-Il s ) / I. I n. r w r z IJ u ft a al IX aA v I tl I t I V it Q ii. N J - I s;N C B 2" tY ' - - O J tl W ) '.�.� "O' i i W t. 1- X N t h ,) G W "L - L. h (J W O �`' �.. .l 31 l L11 1' — 4 4. _ - t1) G r iC1 _)N 1 r J J - O /11 U WI U _ Q„ 1 > L ] f-Ll W W O 0 t1 !n4 -- r t` r U f/'�'' ((Z)1_ ( _ 1 i .— _ [ LY yew - W W Q1 �S 1 �i 4 1 4! / \i 4f f U S Hwy 60 - 80 - 89 0 20 s� i all ,7- ... ..- --"' I,ItEVRON � �1.Tr �� f i,i ,hl..al)Lc, IS - SA14H0 _- S � / Z ° `' — STI TION � TATION G` _2 x,-.0 ►3U.,rQ l'r,v•'i PIZZA LeISUIt�� `nl``� �•�•�•• _ W;n ,V LJ"a�i IIt>41[1 a. O HUT PLAZA •WEST f \_ 1 N ( V '.., ...I-+� +. I �� --I-- ^C ..-. �. _ -r- - I El SURE:s. 0) ISO 29 ` _.... �--..- ' )] , I :15 I)LAZA ASTIG R �. UPCUST I T I Otl !1� COL'On 1 Ifl i Co C 2ua`. Zq ,a co 8.43cke 1 PLAZA A I. _ _ ^, N q I ( � �- a h a \ \� 2 a W .J W I ^� t _ill_ An 1r1 . c I , n• I i II pi. -- J _ T -. , , Ir- 1 ,/ //I _ .0 . w . -/ 1ELH S I E R RA EN T R A D A i• I; 11 H • ',v , I4fili SUBDIVI S IONIt 1 �1I i / is., II ( _. t1,` lu 1 I Fq O — -- '-- .- -7— !' 11 - M'i y 2s, 1 _• A Z Ty i j1. SK ! ,E 1 - . - ' CR - 5 t �I — O .1 1,-)� i, ` I I i I y-� [;, �� A PORTION OF THE Si. SEC 20 TIN R8E P I NAL CO. AR I ZONA _Ik. j SCALE : 1 IN. = 1100 FT. 11 • •• l a w a/ lip I 1]U li - ,I t f j_) tU�U •C fI \.1 1/4 Co `-.)..1/4: 1�.k u - - -- -- -- - - - - - -. _ .. — - - - •t �.r ."..... .c:..... l PUBLIC HEARING ON APACHE JUNCTION GENERAL PLAN January 20. 1982 Mr. Chairman. Ladies and Gentlemen: My name is Clay Worst, P.O. Box 788, Apache Junction. I am a real estate broker representing Clara Carney, owner of the Parcel indicated in red on the map provided. bounded on the north by the Apache Trail. the west by Azure Skies, the south by Broadway, and the east by Sierra Entrada, Apache Ho, and the Superstition Plaza shopping center. The 46 acres west and south of Apache Ho is zoned CR-5 multi- family residential. Your General Plan is the most valuable planning tool I have seen, and your people are to be congratulated. However, I see one inconsistency. The area outlined in green comprises Sections 19 and 20, the most densely developed sections of town, containing 82% of all existing commercial development in the city. The highest concentration of mobile home and trailer parks lie in these tiro sections. These sections have many multi-family dwellings. Of the high density residential patterns within the city, the three largest all lie in this area. The only large residential tract left unsubdivided in these sections is Mrs. Carney's property. Now, despite the fact that there is no existing low density residential development anywhere in Sections 19 or 20 south of the Apache Trail, and an insignificant amount to the north, our Land Use Map proposes low density housing for my client's property. Comprehensive planning calls for meaningful transition between adjacent zones. When you propose low density housing -- presumably 1 family per acre -- immediately adjacent to the Superstition Plaza shopping center, you cross directly over 11 intermediate zoning class- ifications. I submit that this is not meaningful transition. Statistically. there are only two worse transitions possible, viz, to light or heavy industrial. I submit that the proposed land use for my client's property is inappropriate in that it fails to recognize existing development patterns, and in fact creates a major conflict in land use. The land in question was zoned CR-5 multi-family by Pinal County many years ago. You have classified the Environmental Limits to Development as "slight", your best classification. It is not a flood-prone area. There is no known subsidence. The proximity to shopping is unequalled. There is nothing to preclude development into urban-type uses. I'd like to examine the implications of the low-density class- ification, and the manner in which it came to be proposed. This classification calls for a population density range of between 0 and 7 persons per acre, but further refines this by allotina the presumed available groundwater to the study area plus Mesa del Oro. This reduces the allowable population density of Mrs. Carney's land to 2.46 persons per acre, or one dwelling unit per acre. 2 Elsewhere, the plan recommends allowing the keeping of horses on 1-acre minimum parcels. Clearly, the 1-acre minimum lot size is a rural. not an urban, classification, and fails to adhere to the Plan's own admonition that "Development of the city's land use plan and subsequent land use controls to implement that plan must be done with cognizance of present land use patterns..." oink , Mrs. Carney and I realize that this classification on a Land Use Map, in itself, does not change the existing CR-5 zoning. Only a change in the Zoning Map can do this. However, we are alarmed. Our concerns are these. 1. The proposed Land Use Map is by definition a predictive land use tool. It is to predict how this land shall be used. 2. Our present Zoning Ordinance and Map is essentially the old Pinal County Ordinance and Map, with classifications poorly suited to the city's needs, admittedly adopted only as an interim measure. 3. The General Plan states that upon adoption of the Plan the city should instruct the Planning and Zoning Commission to review the entire Zoning Ordinance and Map, and recommend changes. by implication to bring the zoning into conformity with the Land Use Map. 4. Your plan states that "...the burden of proof is upon the applicant to present factsto warrant enoughpermission for different land uses than what appear on the Land Use Map". 5. Under your proposed uses, this parcel will be rendered impossible of development except through legal subdivision, and in your own words, "such subdivision cannot occur until the Groundwater Legislation and availability of water is resolved". Since this moratorium is still in effect. you will have rendered Mrs. Carney's land undevelopable. 6. The General Plan states, "Except in a few isolated instances, it can be assumed that the existing residential density patterns in the city and study area cannot be changed to effect an actual reduction in density", yet the Land Use Map proposes just that. Now, what motivated this change, and what are the alternatives? The classification was arrived at by adherance to mathematical formulae. It was based on the presumption of furnishing, from our existing groundwater supply. enough water to develop some 13,000 acres of desert land in the outlying study area, most of which is in government ownership. To hold in reserve enough water to someday develop these outlying lands, lands in the city proper cannot be developed to their highest and best use. We question this rationale for several reasons. Projects are underway to resolve the potential water shortage. The Arizona Land Department already has a tentative CAP allotment to serve state lands. The Mammoth Mine at Goldfield is being studied as a possible water supply. At the 1,100 ft. level, the mine struck an underground stream that flooded the entire working in a matter of minutest and which two 6-inch steam pumps couldn't lower. Use of mine water for domestic purposes is not unusual. The municipal water supply at Superior is mine water. 3 However. water conservation is not the only issue. The conservation of land may be of greater importance. In America, the amount of agricultural land being converted to urban development is frightening. A diversion of residential housing to desert areas conserves farm lands, and high density housing is the greatest conservator of land.Indeed, someday, for most people, there will be no other kind. I submit that it would be better conservation to allot each parcel of land, as it is developed, sufficient groundwater to be developed to its highest and best use. and when development reaches the maximum that can be maintained with the then existing water supplies, that the remaining lands, presumably government owned. be left for recreational and open space uses until such time as technology produces alternative sources of water. Now if strict adherance to these groundwater formulae is a legal requirement, it would appear that a high density residential classification might be retained downtown by reclassifying a corresponding outlying tract for non-use. A large part of Goldfield is an operating mine, though not so indicated on your map. It not only is a non-user, its major problem is groundwater flooding at the 55 ft. level, which water is being pumped and wasted. If the water allotment is transferred from these properties to the city, the balance could be favorable. They certainly don't want it. Finally, the bare land value of Mrs. Carney's property, with its present uses, is at least 31.5 Million. However, if the permitted uses are brought into conformity with your plan, I would estimate its value at about $1 Million, a loss of 0-Million to my client. Some of you may remember Mrs. Carney. She and Frank came here in 1948. Mrs. Carney is a widow, elderly, and legally blind. She has lived for years off the income from the sale of other lands. This income is running out. This land is her last remaining large asset , which she has held against a time of need. • Mrs. Carney has made application for admission to a sheltered care facility in Tempe. She is dependent upon the sale of this property to accomplish this. I have a buyer for the property at the price mentioned. A rep- resentative of the buyer, whit is himself a past chairman of the Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission, has met with your Planning Director and myself. The buyer advised me that if the city gives any indication of intent to reduce the permitted density of this parcel to a low density classification, that he will consider it impossible of feasible development and will relocate his project in East Mesa. This would suffer Mrs. Carney a loss of about 0-Million, cause the loss of a valuable development and a multi-million dollar increased commercial tax base to the city, when developed. I propose that it is in the city's best interest to amend the Land Use Map to change the classification of Mrs. Carney's property to High Density Residential. in conformity with its present CR-5 zoning, in harmony with surrounding development, and that the State Land Department be left with the problem, if indeed it be a problem, of how to someday supply water to the undeveloped desert south of the county dump. Thank you. LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That I , Clara M. Crney, am the owner of record of the f ollowinz described real property situate in Pinal County, State of Arizona , to wit: Pinal County Tax Parcel No. 101-16-001 Pinal County Tax Parcel No. 101-16-003 All located in Section 20, T.1 N. , R. 8 E. , G.& S.R.B .& M. And that I by these presents do make and appoint Clay Worst , with address at Apache Junction, Arizona , my lawful attorney, in my name and stead , to use and take all lawful means and ways to transact for any and all matters involving zoning classification land use classification, and other matters pertaining to permitted land uses on the above lands. Witness my hand this 20th day of January, 1982. .n4rhAA'"9.11fr -S?le Clara M. Car ey State of ARIZONA) ) ss. County of Pinal ) On this 20th dayof January, 1982, before me , Ruth Ann Armsby NotaryPublic, Carney, personally appeared Clara M. to me well known , who subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same. In witness whereof I set my hand and official seal. Notary Public My commJssion expires: LS My Commission Expires January 25, 1985 Ant 1 196/ December 7, l981 .. � � 't. .r� :�,"�' ya tea..: • Ms. Mildred Baker, Chairman William A. Beaulieu Planning and Zoning Commission 306 E. Frontier 1001 N. Idaho Rd. Apache Jct. , AZ 85220 Apache ]c t . , AZ 85220 Dear Ms. Baker: I have reviewed the Land Use Map for the City of Apache Junction and can appreciate the amount of effort put into this study. Having discussed this plan with some of the available city officials and expressing my opinion, it was recommended that I write a letter stating my views. The five acre parcel situated on the northeast corner of Plaza Drive and Superstition Boulevard is owned by my wife and myself. The legal description is: S1/2SW16SESE'+, Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, G&SRB&M. Since this corner is the turning point for traffic from Superstition Boulevard into the "key" of the city, it should be recognized that this geographical location is the artery into the heart of the city. All traffic from the north going to the post office, A. J. Bayless, and other businesses must turn at this entrance. . Property situated on the highway, U.S. 60, is selling at $800.00 to $1 ,000.00 per front foot and some of this is listed for sale at $1 , 150.00 per front foot. My opinion, being issoci.rted with real estate in this irca, is that it becomes vcry clrllrcull Ior some sui•tII busintssmen Io est iblish r hii .int. at these prices, espee ial ly since property available lot sale is •.o limited. Certainly some business establishments along Superstition Boulevard and Broadway Road would meet the needs necessary for this community. f recognize that the "Land Use Plan" sets aside commercial usage at the section and qu irtet see t ion !tinctures. however, uses of other properties .it piime intersections niiy be best. efts utilized for commercial purpose for the convenience and service of the patrons of Apache Junction. I suggest the corner properties on both the east and west side of Plaza Drive, north of Superstition; and, across the boulevard from the "key," designated as CB-2 usage, be reconsidered as CB-2 usage instead of the existing (.eneral Kuril , a holding designation. Certainly, I say, and with utmost respect to you, I hat I lit hest use of t here p.irc el s i s not (.eu r.i I Itura I . Stn< c rely, i ' WilliamCA. Beaulieu WAB/mav pc: Joe Cero Wendell Clarke Leo Frazier 1 CENTRAL ARIZO A ASSOCIATION . p ���A� °41, OF GOVERNMENTS " `%.1" 1810 MAIN ST P 0 DRAWER 11 PFLORENCE,(602) 68 58 PHONE(602)868 5818 JOHN A.BLACKBURN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IP4.G I O N January 13, 1982 r-r 1 Jam r—7'�9 Mayor Wendell J. Clarke City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Street Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Mayor Clarke: In reference to your letter of December 28 the CAAG staff is submitting the following comments on specific sections of the proposed general plan for Apache Junction. The comments are the result of a fairly detailed reading of the general plan but not the result of a detailed analysis of the plan. 1 - Apache Junction 2001: The General Plan for the City of Apache Junction, Arizona Staff review results in no major comments being offered on this document aside from the general acknowledgement that much research and thought was given to the preparation of the document. 2 - Sewage Disposal Alternatives Without knowledge of the agreement between PRC Toups and the City of Apache Junction on what the final product was to include, it is difficult to make a lot of specific comments on the above report. However, the following appear to be deficiencies for which more attention would be desirable in a report of this nature: 1) It is very light in treatment of institutional aspects. For instance, undiscussed are complications in providing service to areas outside the city boundaries. Additionally, the opportunities and problems in establishing a sanitary district are unaddressed. 2) (P.7-1 and elsewhere) We believe that the longer the city waits to go to alternative 1 or 2, the more costly these will become in terms of constant dollars. It is generally more expensive to sewerize a developed area than one that is sparsely developed. GILA COUNTY GLOBE HAYDEN,MIAMI,PAYSON,SAN CARLOS WINKELMAN PINAL COUNTY APACHE JUNCTION,CASA GRANDE,COOLIDGE,ELOY FLORENCE,KEARNY MA1i 10TH SUPERIOR ' Letter to Mayor Wendell J. ClArke — Page 2 Dated: 1/13/82 3) (P.7-3) EPA funding should probably not be relied upon for planning future projects. There are other options 'that could also be discuss- ed. 4) Many more recommendations could have been made on the basis of the report. There really is nothing in terms of specific recommended actions. From a more positive perspective, the report is readable, logical, and informative- especially regarding on-site system alternatives. 3 - Water Systems Analysis CAAG in general supports the concept that fewer service providers leads to greater efficiencies of service especially where smaller companies are competing alongside the larger companies. Efficiencies of scope are important from a cost of services to subscribers point of view. Some of the increase in rate proposals contained within the report point up the possibilities for consumer cost increases when effi- ciency of service slips over time and needed capital outlay is delayed into the future. We suggest that distance between hydrants might be reconsidered., Pg. 2-3, item 4 - Typo error Capitol (Capital) 6.1) " " strenghthened (strengthened) Pg. 2-4 - Top of Page 2) Might want to consider distance between hydrants as it relates to the ability of the fire service to store hose length on its pumpers and stretch same to reach site of fire. Some companies like no more than 500 feet between hydrants. Pg. 3-24 second Paragraph - Capitol (Capital) 4 - Population Analysis The science of population statistics and projections as applied to the burgeoning community of Apache Junction becomes often imprecise, occasionally unfair, and always time-critical. As regards the last aspect, it is obvious that the products of the 80 census were Just beginning to flow as this work went to press. The in- clusion of data over 20 years old and conclusions from it were perhaps necessary in the summer of 1980 but could be reaccomplished with much greater reliability now. Without attempting to do this in a few brief comments, the following initial observations are offered. Figure 21, projected projection, is close as regards Apache Junction but other numbers are far off (such as Casa Grande and Coolidge being more than twice their actual '80 increases) . Following the urging of CAAG, the state has investigated, revised, and had ratified by POPTAC (Population Technical Advisory Committee) an increased Projection for Pinal County of over 138,000 by 2000 (versus page 11) . Letter to Mayor Wendell J. Clarke A„` Page 3 Dated: 1/13/82 "Bank deposits and postal receipts" do not necessarily "make pretty good sta- tistical information in carrying out population estimates, trends, and projects". (p.9) A bank deposit by one migrating retired couple involving their life sav- ings and $100,000 realized from one-time tax-protected home sale would offset the typical savings balances of one hundred young working couples. Postal rate increases over the past decade have been "impressive". Numbers of accounts or addresses might be useful, but still less reliable than other sources. Even an ostensibly reliable indicator such as construction permits must be tempered by factors of speculation and economic fluctuation resulting in failures to proceed. Sub-county projections should be available from POPTAC by mid-year '82. The "occasionally unfair" reference above is directed at a problem especially acute in Apache Junction. Standard state and federal population census efforts center on declared permanent residence. The City is faced with peak demands for transportation, water, sewage, and other services driven by part-time populations. The case must be forcefully made at state and federal levels that allocations and assistance must include this consideration. 5 - Transportation Plan General Transportation Planners at CAAG endorse this product overall. Even with the ad- vent of the Superstition Freeway and on Idaho or Tomahawk connector to 60 and 88, it appears a thorough overhaul of the existing 60 and 88 intersection will be re- quired. .** Public Transporation Although only one paragraph in a fifty-page report, this aspect can be expected to play an increasing role in the City's quality of life and responsiveness to citizen needs, especially elderly and handicapped. CAAG will continue to provide suggestions and coordination in this area as it has done in assisting the City's Auk application for a Section 18, Urban Mass Transit System. Air Transportation Extensive comments on the airport proposal, briefly mentioned on page 47 of the report, will be forwarded to the City under separate cover. **Consideration could be given to a four-lane sunken corridor from approximately Thunderbird to Winchester for through traffic along 60. This would be advantageous for time, safety, aesthetic, and noise pollution factors. 6 - City Complex Planning Program The City Complex Planning Program which was designed by PRC Toups for the City of Apache Junction is an interesting plan that includes many aesthetically pleasing ideas. Information contained within this report seems to be based on good data. There are some areas that perhaps should be considered that were not noted in this plan: Letter to Mayor Wendell J. CY.xke ^` Page 4 Dated: 1/13/82 1 - Site selection and general design - There is no mention as to whether the buildings will have a solar orientation. Proper orientation could save the City a significant amount of money in lower utility bills. Mounding earth against the west (hottest) side of the structures as well as shading this side with vegetation would also show a significant savings in utilities. 2 - Complex style - Territorial western or spanish style was chosen for the __ complex. Since this is such a traditional style were traditional building materials, such as adobe, considered for any part of this project? Adobe is an energy efficient material that can also save the user money in utility bills. It is also a very aesthetically pleasing material that would lend itself very well to the overall design of the proposed plan. 3 - Other - Since this complex is to be located in the "Sunny Southwest" have solar water heaters been considered? Once again, money may be saved by utilizing these devices. Apache Junction has the unique opportunity of designing their own city complex instead of inheriting one that was built many years ago when energy was cheap. It is with this in mind that the above ideas were mentioned. Sin erely, j' lip/ Goldsberry Regiona lanning Direct4...,,ct 2 : I,P il cc: Joe Gero, Planning Director ;-- 2 5 �981 `o?A ce)O MARJCOPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of PEANNING AND DEVElOPMENT ® � 4. 111 S 3rd Avenue,Room 300,Phoenix,Arizona 85003—Phone(602)262-3201 4R,zoll L , .. .- 'i. , November 24, 1981 Joe Gero, Director of Planning City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Joe: Thank you for sending Maricopa County a copy of the proposed Apache Junction General Plan. At present we have no comments, however, we will conduct a brief review for consistency with plans for eastern Maricopa County. A copy of your plan has been placed in our permanent file at the County Building. We at the County are encouraged by the efforts of the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission to comprehensively plan for one of the fastest growing areas in the State. If we can be of help in the future, please do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, DON E. McDANIEL, JR. , DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Dudley Onderdonk Principal Planner Advance Planning Division DO/na 4.0 ` '� CIi OF MESA : 4 c ARIZONA ers �$ 0E C `0 ``< PLANNING AND 9e1 f pM \. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ci4RIZON ' c.. s. December 23, 1981 Mildred Baker, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 Dear Ms. Baker: Thank you for the draft copy of the Apache Junction General Plan and support- ing documentation which was supplied to our office. I am sure preparation of this plan involved a great deal of time--both of your staff and your commission--for which you are to be commended. As you know, a general plan is more than just another book. A general plan can: * Establish a sense of direction for the community. * Help set priorities on public improvements and services to be provided. * Coordinate public and private actions to help the community run smoothly. * Identify problem areas which will require additional attention to resolve. * Provide a sound informational base upon which to base future land use and land development decisions. . . . and much more. In a "new" community like Apache Junction it is particularly important to have a plan for the future. Apache Junciton, I feel , is at a crossroads. It's past was that of a rural small town--but its future is that of a rapidly growing city on the edge of a very large metropolitan area. Consequently, the challenges Apache Junciton will face in the future will be somewhat dif- ferent from those of the past. The type and scale of your challenges will change as Apache Junction becomes more of a city, and less of a town. MEM Lit£MIfIU CITY 5.5 NORTH CENTER STR1 IT • i'OST OFFICE I3O\ 1466 • 85201 • (()2)834-2011 I/ That's why a general plan is so important. It can help your community to achieve your goals, so that you can prepare for the future--rather than allowing the future to take you by surprise. Population growth will undoubtedly be one of the main issues facing Apache Junction in the future. It's coming, there is no question about that, but how you prepare for it--and handle it once it arrives--is always within your control . Apache Junction needn't be innundated by more people than you can ,.. handle. Water systems, sewer systems and street systems all have a certain "carrying capacity", and if that capacity is exceeded difficulties can be anticipated. The role of the city then is to decide when and how the "carrying capacity" can be increased, or the demand kept within tolerable limits. Apache Junction is to be commended on the work you have done thus far in preparation of the General Plan--and commended in advance for the work that lies ahead to see that your plan is successfully implemented. Sincerely, LC) bo-P4-4-1 Wayne Balmer Assistant Planning Director/ Community Development Coordinator WB:db January 20, 1982 r7,1 Planning and Zoning Commission CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, Arizona 85220 ,.•►, Commission Members. Since the City of Apache Junction is currently formulating a master plan for the city and surrounding areas[known as the Zone of Influence], citi- zens residing in the Zone of Influence areas do hereby wish to make the following statements and recommendations pertaining to residential por- tions of Area I on the Land Use Map: The Sewage Disposal Alternatives section of the General Plan recommends: 1] The low density outlying area should remain such with one acre minimum district which would allow continued use of individual on-site systems [3-1] The Water Systems Analysis section of the General Plan recommends: 2] With regard to land development, the pace of development in the interim should be at a low density pace except for previous zoning decisions and as clarified in the land use element [4-5] Furthermore, a recommendation for land use in the General Plan is as fol- lows: This city and area have developed a western lifestyle that many of the residents desire to retain Those wishes, in as far as prac- tical , should be honored With natural constraints such as soil limitations and slopes, such area should be maintained in low den- sity residential. [2-53] Citizens residing in the Zone of Influence areas of the City of Apache Junction respectfully request that you approve the residential land-use recommendations for those areas, as outlined above. We believe that our request for one-acre minimum lot size is consistent with the General Plan, and we encourage you to vote for its acceptance R spectfully, Fred W Wurst Section 25 Jo Morvak Section 24 �/2 L "l%24. �T1/.zT� .''t v Mr Howard Fulle Sec on 23 oy Ree er -- Se ti -13 ld ::la Section 12 bert Section 4 ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN, STEELSMITH _COUNCILMAN HUDSON __COUNCILMAN E I DSON FYOR CLARKE OUNCILMAN DAMIANO _LauNCII MAN SHANKS UNANIT"OUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ... ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES KleV)Pifit9 .tj° ' ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: X SECONDED BY : YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYO R HILL / COUNCILMAN: STEELSMITH V COLINCILMAN HUDSON ��{/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON 1/ , Y-OR CLARKE VI V/LCOUNCILMAN COUNCILMAN fS 47 V UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL A. i. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS MAYOR CLARKE COUNC I L"1AN HUDSON COUNCILMAN 4gg VICE MAYOR HILL L�ai lvrz� . COUNCILMAN _I= O�-,LN UNANI1OUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL Ink ITEM NO , 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 82-01, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION : 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, " WHICH INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, A LAND USE ELEMENT, INCLUDING THE LAND USE MAP WITH THE AMENDMENTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND A LOCAL COMMERCIAL MODE ON STATE ROUTE 88 IN SECTION 15 ALL AS INDICATED ON THE MARKED MAP, SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES, WATER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, A CIRCULATION (TRANSPORTATION) PLAN, AND A SECTION 16 MASTER PLAN; AND ACCEPTS AS REFERENCE THE REPORTS "A TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR APACHE JUNCTION, " "WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " "SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; " AND ADOPTS AS PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN THE DOCUMENTS ENTITLED "POPULATION ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA," AND "CITY COMPLEX PLANNING PROGRAM, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED AND ADOPTED. ITEM NO. 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT RESOLUTION NO , 82-01, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ADOPTING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION : 2001, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, GENERAL PLAN, " WHICH INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, A LAND USE ELEMENT, SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES, WATER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, A CIRCULATION (TRANSPORTATION) PLAN, AND A SECTION 16 MASTER PLAN; AND ACCEPTS AS REFERENCE THE REPORTS "A TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR APACHE JUNCTION, " "WATER SYSTEMS EVALUATION FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " "SEWAGE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA; " AND ADOPTS AS PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN THE DOCUMENTS ENTITLED "POPULATION ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " AND "CITY COMPLEX PLANNING PROGRAM, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, " BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED AND ADOPTED. o`` PQACHF ✓N U T q,p/ZoNP is itd on p acne &unction July 19, 1982 MEMORANDUM TQ;/ THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH. `,,tfj� JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER ti FROM: � 5 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE (DCC) by JOE GERO SUBJECT: PZ-25-81 (MATOUSEK) The Development Coordinating Committee has reviewed the above-referenced case. The committee would support a rezoning to CB-1 Local Business zone. The reasons are: 1. The stated use on the application is permitted in CB-1. 2. Although there is some nearby CB-2 zoning district area, where the property is developed, it is with CB-1 permitted uses. 3. The proposed general plan indicates a local business node at State Route 88 and Lost Dutchman. 4. CB-1 Local Business is generally compatible with residential development. JWG:rlb 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220 0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982 8002 'NA- Asok l*ir, ,CHE 4. � U } t 1 Z A119/Z00‘ Zt1� o� pac�ie unctio n ... June 10, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: kJOE GERO, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM July 6, 1982 Public Hearing and First Reading July 20. 1982 Second Reading and Consideration General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 129 Rezoning Case No. PZ-25-81 Rezoning Request. CR-1 Single Residence Zone to CB-2 General Business Zone Applicant: Vincent Matousek Power of Attorney: Not Applicable Date of Application. November 10, 1981 Date of Advertisement: December 27, 1981 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: January 12, 1982, February 9, •r 1982, April 13, 1982, June 8, 1982 Area: 4+ Acres (5 Acres less easements and SR 88 right-of-way) Application Requirements Number of Property Owners: 8 (1 mine claim/Arizona Land Dept. ) Number of Exempt Properties: 4 (1 counts otherwise) Number of Affected Owners. 5 Number of Signatures: 3 or 60% �j^ Signatures by Affected Area: 80%+ �-C;l ate r JJ NedU - /*A/1 el - �c i 1 Pt:.lc 1 1 -v 13.1:l•'s5S 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 MEMORANDUM TO: MAID AND CITY COUNCIL (REQUEST FOR _NDA ITEM) Page Two Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) . The DCC recommends that conventional CB-2 rezoning be denied. The reasons are: 1. The surrounding area is generally CR-1 Single Family Residence with some commercial zoning. A planned development would provide a plan for development which would be considered for transition and compatibility with adjacent uses. 2. A review of the plan with regard to access would assist the city and ADOT plan for highway safety and reduce safety hazards. Planning Commission Recommendation. The Commission after the close of the public hearing at its regular meeting on June 8, 1982, voted 6-0 to recommend the following motion: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-25-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 129, application of Vincent Matousek for his property described as: the West 2 of the Northwest 4 of the Northeast 4 of the Northwest 4 of Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona; EXCEPT that portion South- east of the centerline of State Route 88, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence Zone to CB-2 General Business Zone that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application. The reasons for the recommendation are. 1. Those reasons as stated by the DCC. 2. The applicant does not appear to have a firm idea of his plans for the property as noted by the various proposed uses stated." Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum. ) RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO 129 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION. ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-25-81 , application of Vincent Matousek Ainibk ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO. 129 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-81 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVER- ABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS PilisPROINIIIPN DENIED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE OPTIONAL CHOICES a 'Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons. If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk ) kk ORDINANCE NO. 129 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDI- NANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-81 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVER- ABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as the West 2 of the Northwest 1 of the Northeast 1 of the Northwest ' of Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT that portion southeast of the centerline of State Route 88, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from CR-1 Single Residence Zone to CB-2 General Business Zone. SECTION II REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause or portion of this ordinance or any part of the Code adopted herein by reference, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for a period of six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Each day that a ,^ violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as hereinabove described PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 19 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ity Attorne r 1 PZ-25-81 (f1ATOUSEK) PROPOSED ORDINANCE M. 129 RECUESTED REZONING FROM ^ CR-1 (SINGLE RESIDENCE) TO CB-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) CB-2 PINAL COUNTY M 0-2 / CB_ — r—riZrb,17ra-7, :,7--( F264 CR-1 I� / CR-1 CB-2 �b(' � E Hidalgo Rd a subject hG6 <a property c*e i ,/, PQa CR-1 U 4- CR-1 44. y = /,' CR-1 —c. E Windsor), St. L � L.R-1 E F CE-2 C O .MM. o ' CR-1 Z CR-1 / j 1 U e N SCALE ! 1 0 300 600 FEET RECEIVED DEc 0 193t 100 25 5. APPLICATION FOR AI,IENDMDIT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Cash Receipt No 093 A unt cD`batevi/,h'Case Number JS .51 TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL. ^' I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed). Parcel 1 Fran. CR 1. To• CB 2. Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet)• The ;lest Half of the Northwest Quarter, of the /149FTFIRCAW NORTHEAST Quarter, of the Nortnwest Quarter, of Section 15, Towenship 1 , North, Range 8. East of the Gilla and Saltriver Base and Meridian, Pinal County, Arizona. The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & eneral location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance rain nearest mapped street). s4'AC Hiway # 88 on the South, Lost Dutchman on the North, Wickiup, on the nest—side. (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1. Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under efts present zoning districting? Present Zoning not compatible for future Plans. 2. Are there any known changes in land use, street arrangement, or, other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer NO. 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the conmmnity or neighborhood, as the case may be? Lack of Tourist Lodging in Eiphe Junction Area. I believe this would be very Appreciable Service to the Community. 4 Other reasons for the subject request. Page 1 of 2 pages Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures. MOTEL Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit same in person to• Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona. (Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning). VINCENT J. MATOUSEK, 139 So. Crismon Rd. Apache Jct. 986 4070. (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) (Name &Address of person to wham petition & notices should be mailed) /94)/ (Signatur f lapplicant) (Date) *Note Plans are required when application is filed for following. Special Use Penults under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) ^ LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks Page 2 of 2 pages ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMAN SHANKS _COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE MAYOR HILL UNANITMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED j ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES .4110A3 CIAlitt t f ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: fi- SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED MAYOR CLARKE CO(1NC I LMA1f DPM IANO C UNCI I MAN STEELSPIITH COUNCTIMAN HUDSON -C011�1CTl P^AN S_LIANKS ,_COUNCILMAN FIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL _ ,.�. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES i / Si OP ITEM It MEETING OF MOTION BY: (:- ke SECONDED BY: :Z;;----- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN E I DSON //. COUNCILMAN SHANKS V , VICE_MAYOR HILL C./ COUNCILMAN DAMIANO V , MAYOR CLARKE V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH v UNANI'10US , IN FAV R OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES IA ,, 1 4 1 vi pi/) ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY : l .. YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL / COUNCILMAN. STEELSMITH . COUNCILMAN HUDSON I/ COUNCILMAN EIDSON V YOR CLARKE _ V FOUNCILMAN DAMIANO V _�O1.INCI LMAN SHANKS V UNANIIOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED k ABSTAINED TOTAL LP ITEM NO , 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 129 BE AMENDED TO DELETE ALL REFERENCE TO "CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE" AND INSERT IN LIEU THEREOF IN ALL SUCH PLACES THE TITLE "CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE. " Step 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 129, AS AMENDED, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 3 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 129 AS AMENDED FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 129, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-81 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-1 LOCAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING : A . "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. " B . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS . IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE. IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK. ) D , "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH IN THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM DATED JULY 19, 1982" FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO , 8 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 129, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO . 129 FOR THE SECOND READING , Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 129, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-81 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED) FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : A, "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. " B. (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS . IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C. (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK, ) FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO . 8 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ITEM NO. 8 Side 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 129, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Side 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 129 FOR THE SECOND READING , de 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 129, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-25-81 FROM CR-1 SINGLE RESIDENCE ZONE TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED , FOR DENIAL PQACHE' ✓i. O _. ' yCI u W1 z *r • . qR/ZONP ity o &ipache &unction June 10, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: 2' JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: JOE GERO, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM July 6, 1982 Public Hearing and First Reading July 20, Second Reading and Consideration General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 147 Rezoning Case No. PZ-9-82 Rezoning Request. GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone Applicant. Mary Currie Power of Attorney: A.E. Sullivan, Jr. Date of Application: May 5, 1982 Date of Advertisement: May 23, 1982 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date. June 8, 1982 Area + 2.5 Acres Gross; Net 1.8 Acres Maximum Dwelling Units Permitted: 39 Multiple Family Application Requirements: Number of Property Owners: 12 Number of Exempt Properties: 12 Number of Affected Owners: 0 Number of Signatures- 0 Signatures by Affected Area: 0 Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) : DCC has no objection to rezoning provided fifty feet of right-of-way dedicated on both Broadway and Tomahawk along property frontage. Note: applicant has submitted a quit claim deed for that purpose. n Approver for Agendad ..... 5.�.-..... First Reading `7/:70 Item Second Reading' l... ... _..1 .._ - V-Public Hearing .3.e7Old Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • .._TELI1141€14(6044 982-8002 MEMORANDUM TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL (REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM) Page Two Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission at their regular meeting of June 8, 1982, after public hearing passed the following motion by a 6-0 vote: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-9-82, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 147, application of Mary Currie for her property described as. The Southwest ; of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 22, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. The reasons for the recommendations are: The CR-5 uses are the highest and best use of property." Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum. ) ,.. �. .► RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 147 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-9-82 , application of Mary Currie ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 147 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-9-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE: OPTIONAL CHOICES a Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b. (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) i r ORDINANCE NO. 147 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-9-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcel of land described as The southwest ; of the Southwest $ of the Southwest I of the Southwest ; of Section 22, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence Zone. SECTION II REPEALING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the vali- dity of the remaining portions thereof SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as herein- above described. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor • ATTEST. f Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney PZ-9-82 PROPOSED ORDINANCE N0, 147 Amok REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR (GENERAL RURAL) TO CR-5 (MULTIPLE FAMILY) ra ra o E. 6TH AVE, ¢ z x a c-) w o w F- 0 w lf:E, 7TH AVE. .1 I SUBJECT i I SITE 330. — — 1 E. BROADWAY AVE, .00114., SCALE 0 3U0 bOO FEET N n n i APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNON, ARIZONA V 73 , �- ei 41-ea CiAlAiL Cash Receipt No /j7L Lnt trr.c'Date041xase N tuber PL-9-5-2-- TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed). Parcel 1 From. .n , i 1 ' a l To '" Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 Parcel 5 The legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application ( is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet). . 3ct ic't 22 1 C, cascoPn''s The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance from nearest mapped street). (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed.) 1. Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districting? •t ,'1,, .rt.:s•nt 'iwo you can onJv put tcro units. C _ c Jo" `o oth>y. type.: o' :ni u; is a wain'. 2. Are there any Imam changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted? Please explain "Yes" answer. o ant t, zonal to ' 5. T.an' to the as` sqan zoned "71 1 3 If your requested change is to provide additional commercial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the community or neighborhood, as the case may be? Explain Ta 'r t. o t z,,... iil n.e,'t an hou•:_.' .t. 1_:s ar? 4. Other reasons for the subject request ,,,: „ro:> -',r - i11 :C more 'alaolc Page 1 of 2 pages Describe existing & proposed future use of subject property, buildings and structures lan! if C ;1`, Lop In 'laln a '7U:Lide; Cone in awl '1.11:1 .1'i .. nh.. - . U. ^.OS `ha' np..,k1 riac'.' to , but con nut Attach any supporting information, statements or plans* to this application & submit same in erson to• Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning). Li! _c",1 _ '3_171 ) .^". ac'ua. (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) rh,'ner '7" ,a'q ''Y 'vc ,noonix,', "C]7 2'2 7r7.,,7 (Name of applicant or representative) (Address) (Phone) C -ate' n - -,! 41' . ^,�-i,,."n "•.r q ct.e , inn( i.0a,•,". .^" hr (Name*&Address of person to whom petition & notices should be mailed) (Signature of applicant) (Date) 'Note. Plans are required when application is filed for following. Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial CI-2, Article 18, Trailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c DO NUT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION Date filed Applicant Zoning Case ( Census Division & Tract No Application received by Remarks. Page 2 of 2 pages ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Li 1 ITEM If MEETING OF MOTION BY : SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED _COUNCILMAN LMAN STEELSMITH COUNCILMM SHANKS MAYOR CLARKE COUNC I LMAN HUDSON id COUNCILMAN DAMIANO 'V VICE MAYOR, HILL COUNCILMAN EIDSON UNANI'.0 IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ri Ili/ ITEM # MEETING OF MOT I ON BY : q,L be SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS V COUNCILf'AT! DAMIAN0 V COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON .MAYOR CLARKE UNANITOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 147, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) St— 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 147 FOR THE SECOND READING , Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO, 147, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-9-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED) FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : A. "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE , " B. (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS , IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS . ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE. IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK. ) FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO . 9 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 147, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, Step 2 the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 147 FOR THE SECOND READING. .-. Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 147, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-9-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CR-5 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED , FOR DENIAL PQACHE di (--- 77 U ; ,It r Z qR, NP CO it o acne unction ZO p Ai.. June 10, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER I FROM: �1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BY .. JOE GERO, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AGENDA ITEM July 6, 1982 Public Hearing and First Reading July 20, 1982 Second Reading and Consideration General Information: Proposed Ordinance No. 148 Rezoning Case No. PZ-10-82 Rezoning Request: GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone Applicant• Mike Kovacs Power of Attorney: Date of Application: May 7, 1982 Date of Advertisement• May 23, 1982 ..► Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Date: June 8, 1982 Area: ±2.65 Acres; Net area ±0.28 Acres Application Requirements: Number of Property Owners: 9 Number of Exempt Properties: 2 Number of Affected Owners: 7 Number of Signatures: 4 or 57%+ Signatures by Affected Area: + 57% Development Coordinating Committee Comments (DCC) : The Development Coordinating Committee has no objection to- the rezoning Approver for Agenda �atte Item # First Reading .a14a� .. ). Second Reading �/ 1 .._ t ublic Hearing . Old Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85220-0190 -•-- Ne L (602)982.8002 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYS AND CITY COUNCTIL (REQUEST FOR JENDA ITEM) Page Two Planning Commission Recommendation: At their regular meeting of June 8, 1982, after a public hearing the Commission passed the following motion 6-0: "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City .� of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-10-82, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 148, application of Michael Kovacs for his property described as: the West 2 of the Southeast 4 of the Southeast 4 of the Southwest 4, lying north of the centerline of U.S. Highway 60, Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business Zone, that the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application. The reasons for the recommendation are: Because of the highway frontage on U.S. Highway 60 and the size of the parcel , the CB-2 General Business Zone is the highest and best use for the parcel ." Recommended Motion: (See attached memorandum. ) - - RECOMMENDED MOTION ORDINANCE NO. 148 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT IN ZONING CASE PZ-10-82 , application of Mike Kovacs ALSO KNOWN AS ORDINANCE NO 148 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES. BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS MOTION ARE• OPTIONAL CHOICES a. Those reasons as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission which are hereby adopted by reference." b (Council may wish to use only some of the Commission reasons If this is the case, you will have to read those specific reasons.) c. (Council may wish to use all new reasons or other reasons in addition to the above. If this is the case, you will have to read them and you are requested to write them out for the City Clerk.) t rook ORDINANCE NO. 148 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE, REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT „0116, SECTION I IN GENERAL The zoning district classification on the Apache Junction, Arizona, Zoning Map for the parcels of land described as The West 1 of the Southeast ; of the Southeast ; of the Southwest If of Section 21, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, lying north of the centerline of U S Highway 60, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, be and hereby is amended by changing the zoning district classification from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business zone SECTION II REPEALING OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference are hereby repealed. SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY If any section, sub-section, sentence, phrase, clause, or portion of this ordinance or any part of the code adopted herein by reference is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the vali- dity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION IV PENALTY CLAUSE Any person found guilty of violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a violation continues shall be a separate offense punishable as herein- above described. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, this day of , 19 Wendell J. Clarke Mayor ATTEST Kathleen Connelly City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City ttorney Oak Ads PZ-10-82 (KOVACS) PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO, 148 REQUESTED REZONING FROM GR GENERAL RURAL "oft. TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ra ca � oI ( a `-' E, 5TH AVE CB-2 N o 6b' GR \ y'G11ir N \ N4)-6 r- -- A —1 E, 6TH AVE, N o41411 \I ? I GR CBi ,v .�r GR \ \ w w 0 o.. I 1 0 300 600 FEET APPLICATION FOR AM:1\11E1NT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR CHANGE or ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES FOR APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA Gish Receipt No /C Arrnuntj00`"""Date //. Case Number P2-iD• Cs TO APACHE JUNCTION CITY COUNCIL I hereby request a change of zoning classification, an amendment to the zoning regulations, or approval of a Special Permit as follows (list the present zon- ing classification & then the proposed classification, using separate parcel numbers if more than one change of zoning is proposed). Parcel 1 Fran General Rural (GR) To CB-2 Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Parcel 4 _ Pei cel 5 Me legal description of the property proposed to be rezoned by this application is as follows (if more space is needed, attach separate sheet) W SEy SE4 SWi Lying North of the North ROW Section 21 T1N RHE The size (to nearest tenth of an acre) & general location of the subject property is as follows (give direction & distance from nearest mapped street) Approximately .5 Acres fronting on the North side of Hgwy 60, angling to a point to Colt Road on the West. (Please answer the following questions in the space provided or submit a separate signed statement if additional space is needed ) 1 Why is the property in question not reasonably suited for uses permitted under present zoning districtineBecause it is located on a major highway and there is Commercial activity in the area 2 Are there any knaon changes in land use, street arrangement, or other physical conditions that have altered the character of your property, or adjoining property, since the present zoning was adopted'? Please explain "Yes" answer Yes: Property to the West is zoned CB-2. C i 3 If your requested change is to provide additional ccr mrcial or industrial zon- ing, is there a demonstrable need for this zoning in order to serve the carncuu ty or neighborhood, as the case may beg [xplain Yes' Because of the projected growth in our community, there is a definite need for additional commercial property. 4 Other reasons for the subject request. The physical location of subject property is ideal for commercial developement! Page 1 of 2 pages Desttthe existing & pxuposed leture use of subject property, buildings and structures Existing use is vacant land. Expected use to be Garage, Oil &,Lube shop, and other uses allowed in CB-2 Zoning such as a Laundromat. Attach any supporting i.nfonu.rtion, statements or plans* to this application & submit same: in person to Apache Junction Zoning Administrator's Office, Apache hu1ctLon, Aii.ona (Note The land owner(s) must sign below or else the appli- cant must submit a letter signed by the owner authorizing him to apply for this change of zoning) II (Name of applicant or iepiesentative) (Address) hone) (Niiee o-WITIicant ot. representative) (Address) (Phone) /- (C7vne & Address of person to wham petition & notices should be mailed) • (Signattu e of applicant) (fiate) Note• Plans are required when application is filed for following: Special Use Permits under Section 2302, Area & Neighborhood Plans, Article 32, Indus- trial C1-2, Article 18, lYailer Courts, Article 20, Section 2001-c. IX) NOT FILL OUT FOLLOWING (for office records only) LEGAL PUBLICATION (kite filed Applicant Zoning Case Census Division & Tract No Application received by Rernrrks Page 2 of 2 pages ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES rgAll "iJi4Jr. • ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: YES NO ABSTAINED COIINCI MANDAMIANO COUNCILMAN EIDSON t✓ r.nuNC ILN'AN HUDSON V MAYOR CLARKE _VIC.F MAYOR HILL _COUNCILMAN STFFI SfMITM COUNCTI MAN SHANKS / UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES t ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 4 -- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN HUDSON V COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS IIIMININIMMI VICE MAYOR HILL INIMMENIMIN COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE _ COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH UNANIr".O S , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 10 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 148, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 148 FOR THE SECOND READING , Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO, 148, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : A. "THOSE REASONS AS SET FORTH BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WHICH ARE HEREBY ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. " B. (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ONLY SOME OF THE COMMISSION REASONS , IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THOSE SPECIFIC REASONS , ) C . (COUNCIL MAY WISH TO USE ALL NEW REASONS OR OTHER REASONS IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE , IF THIS IS THE CASE, YOU WILL HAVE TO READ THEM AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO WRITE THEM OUT FOR THE CITY CLERK. ) FOR APPROVAL ITEM NO , 10 Step 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 148, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED , (NOTE: This motion must have a unanimous vote to carry; if the vote is not unanimous, the clerk must read the ordinance in full . ) Step 2 CALL UPON THE CITY CLERK TO READ THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO , 148 FOR THE SECOND READING . Step 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT ORDINANCE NO , 148, AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE BY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-10-82 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO CB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, DENIED , FOR DENIAL .+. File le No . 302 . 10 rQ p,CHF ✓P G ': Z qR/zo N� C6it y � o ache &unction � c Approver for Agenda 4 .. Date Item # Fiat Reading VA9, /I.. Second Reading DATE : July 13 , 1982 Public Hearing Old Business MEMORANDUM TO . The Honorable Mayor and /New Business /� Members of the City Council --4•/ THROUGH: t \ City Manager 0 S\-1—Th FROM: Director of Public Works ( .._,,,__k,'i.),.,_.,,,, REGARDING: Bids For Fuel In conjunction with fuel tank installations , bids were re- quested for fuel. In this process the following companies were contacted by telephone : R.R. & R.R. Evans Chevron, Texaco , Western States Petroleum Inc . , Union Oil Products , Crystal Energy of Arizona Inc . , Cory Oil and Concho . Of those companies contacted , Cory Oil and Concho were mailed a bid packet and R.R. & R.R. Evans picked up a bid packet . In addition, public notice was published in the Mesa Tribune and the Arizona Business Gazette. On July 12 , 1982 , a bid opening was held and the only bid proposal was submitted by R.R. & R.R. Evans . Subsequently this office called Cory Oil and Concho to inquire why bid proposals were not submitted. Cory Oil indicated mar- ket fluctuation caused them some concern. However, there were provisions in the bid documents to allow for such fluctuations . Concho indicated their previous commitments would not allow them to submit a proposal. In addition to the above inquires , this department surveyed fuel costs at local service stations . The results are that R.R. & R.R. Evans proposal of $1 . 269 is . 08c to . 15C lower than self service and . 14G to . 28 lower than full service . Considering the cost savings for purchasing and dispensing fuel on the City Complex, a savings of $3 , 120 to $ 10 ,920 can be realized con- sidering the minimum and maximum charges for fuel at service stations . 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 July 13 , 1982 Mayor and City Council Page Two Asir A similar survey was performed regarding the diesel fuel portion of the bid and the cost savings ranged from $200 to $370 . Considering the sensitivity of the fuel market and consider- ing there are savings to the City by purchasing fuel in bulk supply , it is recommended that R.R. & R.R. Evans be awarded the bid for fuel in accordance with the requirements of the bid document . RWB/cc s + n '�R�zoNP � (Oil o ace f unction � 'nft' FUEL PROJECT NO. PW-82-5 JULY 12, 1982 Those Present: Kathleen Connelly, City Clerk Lori Clark, Administrative Secretary On June 27 , 1982, throught July 2, 1982 , a public notice was published in the Mesa Tribune, and once on June 29, 1982 , in the Arizona Business Gazette, inviting bid proposals for fuel. The written bids were to be submitted by 10 : 00 a.m. , on July 12 , 1982, in compliance with bid specifications and the total amount of the bid. The bids , opened and read by the City Clerk Kathleen Connelly, were as follows: #2 Diesel Unleaded R.R. & R.R. Evans . 949 per gal. 1 . 269 per gal. P.O. Drawer E Mesa, Arizona 85201 A.. -3 - L-(.6.a-74 ae---,Le-a; f Kathleen Connelly City Clerk WITNESS: j. 0 CL;4 .L (-Lori Clark Administrative Secretary lvc 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PROJECT NO . PW-82-5 COST PROPOSAL Firm or Individual : R. R. & R. R. EVANS Address : P. 0. Drawer E Mesa, AZ 85201 �\ Telephone No. 962-6111 Date : 7-8-82 Item No. Approximate Material Price Quantity Description *1 . 10 ,000 gals . #2 Diesel Fuel .949 /gal . figures ninety-four & nine tenths cents /gal . words **2 . 39 ,000 gals . Unleaded Gasoline 1.269 /gal. (Minimum Octane Rating 91) figures one dollar & twenty-six & nine tenths cents /gal . words i•. NOTE : *Amounts to be purchased in lots of 1 , 000 gallons or less . NOTE : **Amounts to be purchased in lots of 10 ,000 gallons or greater . -5- I TY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA PROJECT NO. PW-82-5 Understanding and Agreement Bids for Fuel Proposal to the: Director of Public Works City of Apache Junction 1001 N. Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Gentlemen: In compliance with the Advertisement for Bids, and having examined these contract Amk documents, site of work and being familiar with the conditions to be met, we hereby submit the following proposal for furnishing the products listed and agree to enter into contract with the City for product delivery at the location specified and for the prices set forth on inside pages. Fuel will be manufactured by CHEVRON USA Name of Company P 0 Box R, Concord , CA 94524 Company Address R. R. & R. R. EVANS 962-6111 Responsible Agent Telephone Number Fuel will be distributed by R. R. & R. R. EVANS Name of Company P 0 Drawer E, Mesa, AZ 85201 Company Address R. R. & R. R. EVANS 962-6111 Responsible Agent Telephone Number We hereby acknowledge receipt of and confirm this Proposal is based on the following addendum: This proposal is submitted by: R. R. & R. R. EVANS A Corporation organized under the laws of the State of ARIZONA , A Partnership consisting of , or individual trading such as of the City of , and the holder of an Arizona State Contractor's License: Classification : No . Respectfully submitted , R. R. & R. R. EVANS 306 S. Country Club Drive Firm Address Jack Keller - Gen ral Manager Mesa, AZ By : (Officer and Title) City 4962-6111 /n fA Kt(fe.„.,. Telephone No . 62‘. Officer and Title 40Ir Witness ( If Bidder is an Individual) -6- PROJECT PW-82-5 EXCEPTIONS - ADDITIONS - CORRECTIONS For uniformity and bid comparison purposes all previous documents shall be completed as received from the City of Apache Junction. Should the bidder wish to note any exceptions , additions , or corrections , do so separately on this page . (13) Price increases/decreases R. R. & R. R. EVANS prices are subject to change without notice. However, all price increases or decreases from Chevron USA will be documented in writing. -7- ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ))j)P/6j) 7 / ITEf 1 It MEETING OF MOTION BY: Ill SECONDED BY: 92.0i/M- YES NO ABSTAINED VICE MAYOR HILL COUNC I LMAN. STEELSM I TH COUNCILMAN HUDSON I COUNCILMAN EIDSON r/ YOR CLARKE V DAMIANO frOUNCILMAN COUNCILMAN &HANKS 4 UNANIMOUS , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTALi : ITEM NO . 11 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE PROPOSAL BY R, R, & R. R, EVANS AS RECEIVED ON JULY 12, 1982, FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION PW-82-5 (BIDS FOR FUEL) IN THE AMOUNT OF Loy (1)014 7. (6-lueI BE AND HEREBY IS, ACCEPTED,+n • •..- .1' I..iPQ - p,CHE✓G U , �, Z i 4x r .aV2.. q,p/ZONP Wily o f 04acLLe cOunctian July 13, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL, CITY MANAGER FROM: JEFF BELL, COMMUNITY SERVICES SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT: REQUESTS FOR AGENDA ITEM PLACEMENT APPOINTMENT TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Please find attached 6 Talent Bank applications from citizens interested in applying for the Parks and Recreation Commission. Appointments need to be made to allow the continued progress of the Commission. Your action on this matter will be greatly appreciated. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. "" JB/rbj3 Approver for Agenda..1 .._...... Item * First Reading . . .. .../..ta..... Second Reeding ..... p,J ,'.- i Oid susiaass ..LZ-New Business 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHE✓e/ O p'.4);; • `11?-"°-/ZONP "MIL, o7 9/paciie 2unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR I6' (7- G--G(� , /fT/4/f.-- BOARD/COMM I SS I ON/COMM I TTEE DATE: p- --,pD NAME: / )2? CC J//v f TELEPHONE: (home) CODE: /J1'Z- L p OCCUPATION: (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: (T/6-I/ �G 1JG c L PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: SCOUT/,c y Jr yE61)e_j I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Signature of Applicant 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982.6154 4rii- q,pIZONp- 'Oily O7 04pacIie unclian TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR .,r.1f7�if,e, ,Q '-,t� BOARD/COMMISSION MITTEE . / /QD NAME: <1, .ri m, ,) TELEPHONE: (home) G (office ADDRESS: ,, ZIP CODE: 7So?m? U OCCUPATION: Thc c,t tjrn - �-2.�-#'rz , (if retired please indicate former occupation or profession) _ EDUCATION: I tp, el F.e_-F'Q,1 c_ PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ��„�,,,/ /, 2,- z4,.-� . I FEEL THAT I AM QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE BECAUSE O ., ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES-�n�e«� AAA! `ie e,,_..�� (�•,., hG �j o�/,4,:„,.?��x- ",-.Jn/l�`-_,,',9_ q a-7,_,,,,-z�,/, /y 0�/e�4'./ / li�`eCl/ NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From • time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for _ recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action ._ is taken. • . If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that one requirement is that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless . authorized by the Mayor and Council. - 4" . -.Iee-0;-.- -eer2) --;,----1.-,-.,,yi7.— --:, .Z • -....:.. I re of Applicant ,;may f41-.;;�;,: +s.� ;�-.!: >, ,car. :,. 150 NORTH OCOTILLO • POST OFFICE BOX K.APACHE JUNCTION.ARIZONA 85220 . rTELEPHONE(602)982-6154 ..-1FCY 2.: - - . -- - `i" � 'ALL 4:_a.:=•=•41 4vel.!'„ter• ... .- iliACHi.. ✓Gy V ii.W. ui ... Z .1P/ZONP V ity o &tpache 09unction TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR . / 5 ec"e4 / / ° /✓ BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE DATE: . ALy /NA : / 4 TELEPHONE: (home) / / / ZIP CODE: YS 2 d CI OCCUPATION: /ice- / /if7e. D - 7e_Ac-Al 7 / S / e. IL T/'e r 4,,,.E (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) / A U 4� Qd�` ''� EDUCA ION• 20 / ----,, ,y-,- k...,0,-.e..41_,_ ,t--;.'474.0- 4/t1,2}C)- S- '_) 4...,,,,,„(( -- 7 QS:bi.Y PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: e- -,tip .e G.c--YL 4-7 L 4-c4-,_ ,6� ti ADDIT ONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: /4--e-1C� ..G�G-I,7J a4-1'--1-( ...... NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests are received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. -//4e, 1,4i Revised 6/19/81 Signature of Applicant 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 1r'77' / AQi\CHE ' • • '9,QizoN� it o C �acuie ZGizc io z TALENT BANK APPLICATION FOR 61,24.4 �c � , B0ARD�G0Mf•1ISSI0N�C0i ��ITTEE `// DATE: 2 _ -r 2 • l7Ul TELEPHONE: > (office ADDRESS. ZIP CODE: OCCUPATION: (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: / 'c7 .���. `r�7/'��� ea-'( ( �i?-Ccr'C/,� PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ,- -, _�� 2tr` ;;uw✓ . ��� a. 1.7 • vc1 �cr (Vt . "4= ADDITIONAL PERTINENT NFOR:ATI0N/RCF .E?ICES: ! �7 Cat f tell /'-07�✓'G�.!� .,tie.(/-d NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to time, requests arc received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizens to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. Revised 6/19/S1 Sir;•taturc of Applicant r , 11;-/ CNE gP/�C5Np. Cit o fj -4paclle ZLiZctZU2Z TALENT BANK APPLICATIO1 FOR feek, 4 ecelii-i0"/ BOARD/C0mf•1IssIoN/Co ihITTEE • DATE: 7 - 6 ZS NA-E: l _ / /t6 e k• // gz1-' /ii is (17 TELEPHONE: (of fic ADDRESS: ZIP CODE: F-S-,;/),_r) OCCUPATION: l':P_,4C_ (S 7 / ( (if retired, please indicate former occupation or profession) EDUCATION: 2 01 c 11Tr'Q / ,,,Q4h. a �t 0( c / ,,/,1 `r1l(��ty PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: /1 P�rat 7'C`r S(', roFickel) )� 1, y,rc'r. ) (�1`.,' ) t_s r�'� P' i � �,,5 )ec / 4X0 ce l/i4 1 I�ris' .... ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: 66l ,e'pry'c Besiee )r l r14-kc 4P/-- W 7-el. ( , IVde_ - lec� P/sec. 1 o Lr•tie ( - '/< SThe C Stir / f / G,✓ ((cu. fbgt e t•t 146 c NOTE: As a candidate to a Council Board, Commission or Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. From time to tire, requests arc received from State and County legislators for recommendations of citizen:, to serve on State and County Commissions. If the City Council recommends your name be submitted, you will be contacted before this action is taken. If appointed to a Board/Commission/Committee, I understand that I must reside within the corporate limits of the City of Apache Junction and that I cannot be absent from the city for over 30 days at one time unless authorized by the Mayor and Council. e-}( 21 142/tVI Revised 6/19/SI Si,,n.iture of Applicant ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: linp7:1--e SECONDED BY: YES/ NO ABSTAINED '✓ COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH _COUNCILMAN SHANKS .COUNCILMAN HUDSON VICE MAYOR HILL (I/ UNANIIOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL _ Ink ow\ ITEM NO , 12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITYICOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JU1LCTIO , ARIZONA, THAT CJ/1 lreh i s , AND w Qom. BE APPOINTEP TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 20, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES / 7 )/6 ITEM # MEETING OF PLOTION BY : vd )i' SECONDED BY : .ei-erY)// YES NO ABSTAINED MAYI ' it . 1111.1111111111111111 COt1NC I LMPft_DPM IANO CaUNcILML LSMIT COIFNCL.LLAN • ON _CCilN1`i1 P"AN &HANKS _COUNCILMAN I � ► VICE MAYOR - HILL UNANITS ,} IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ITEM NO , 13 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE CITY HALL COMPLEX ON AUGUST 3, 1982, AT 6 : 00 P .M. A. A. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES V114. ' 2/ OJo5Y � ITEM II MEETING OF (41 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: )//1-61`c-;--e YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN STEELSMITHMIIIIIIIIIIII COUNCILMAN SHANKS MAYOR CLARKE IIIMINPAINIMEMmommmiliffillillillill COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN EIDSON UNANI" US , IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL AlAft. Jar Aloik • ITEM NO , 14 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING ON AUGUST 2, 1982, AT 7 : 00 P. M. C F q PQA ✓ , .s.,,t,.. 11,4sto -'-',C5 '' . gR/ZONp. ` 'ity o7, .ipache &unction July 14, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THROUGH: JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: l JOE GERO, PLANNING DIRECTOR e HUCK NEWCOMER, ACTING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUBJECT. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES TRANSMITTAL Attached are the approved Minutes of the June 7, 1982, meeting of the Board of Adjustment. Please have them placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk' s office. The next regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment is scheduled for August 2, 1982, at 7:00 p.m. , in the Council Chambers. CRN:rlb Attch. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 Amok MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA JUNE 7, 1982 7 00 P M Present Absent Guests Mr. Berry Ms. Oberg Lloyd L Bray Mr. Burfiend Fred Lazzell Mrs Luddy Edward Holmquist Mr Morrison Ilene Taylor Mr. Vaughn, Vice Chairman George Luddy Mr Jessamine, Chairman W.S. & Lois Cummings Chuck Newcomer, Executive Secretary Becky Breece, Recording Secretary Jimmy Eidson, Liaison > Synopsis Minutes dated May 3, 1982 Public Hearings BA-5-82 (Southard) BA-7-82 (Holmquist) BA-4-81 (Corsi) 1 Chairman called the meeting to order and asked the Recording Secretary to call the roll. IL 2 Ms Breece called the roll, determining one member was absent, as indicated above. 3 Chairman asked for a motion to approve the Minutes dated May 3, 1982. 4 Luddy/Berry M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated May 3, 1982, be adopted, as presented " The motion passed unanimously (6-0) 5. Chairman asked staff to brief the Board on BA-5-82 (Southara). 6 Mr Newcomer stated the applicant requested a continuation of the public hearing until the next Board meeting date. 7 Chairman called for a motion to that effect. 8. Vaughn/Berry M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the public hearing on case BA-5-82 be continued until Monday, July 12, 1982, at 7 00 p m., in these chambers L motion fpatsosedr ienfanthmeouBsoayr d(6 BTahsekemdotit9 Chairman A-7-82 (Holmquist). 10. Mr Newcomer explained the subject property was located in the Sierra Entrada Garden Homes subdivision where the lots are substandard size The applicant requests a variance to rear yard setback requirements to construc- an addition to an existing covered patio Ask 1 Page 2 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of June 7, 1982 11 Chairman invited the applicant to speak. 12. Mr Holmquist noted the variance was requested for three reasons 1 Cooling advantage 2. Appearance 3. Community benefit by tax increase 13. Chairman asked for staff recommendation. r\Y 14 Mr. Newcomer presented the Zoning Administrator's recommendation tf for denial 15 Chairman asked for comment in favor or oppositon, there being none, Commission discussion was opened. 16 Mr Vaughn noted the Zoning Administrator's comment that the patio was not on the plat recorded with Pinal County. 17 Mr Holmquist felt he could locate other documents supporting his contention that the patio was approved by Pinal County 18 Chairman commented that that was irrelevant due to Grand- fathering 19 Vaughn asked Ilene Taylor, Planning and Zoning Commission member in attendance, to state the progress made on the Sierra Entrada planned development ordinance 20 Ms Taylor noted that the case had not yet come before the Planning and Zoning Commission 21 Mr Morrison felt all variances in this subdivision should be held pending adoption of a planned development ordinance 22. Ms. Luddy cautioned the Board to be consistent, noting a similar variance request had been denied just last month 23 Mr Vaughn contended that this variance request should be approved since it is an open patio and leaves several feet more rear yard than the application that was before the Board last month 24. Mr Burfiend argued that with the planned development being processed the Board should wait on matters dealing with this subdivision. 25 Chairman called for a motion 26. Burfiend/Morrison M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the requested variance in case BA-7-82 be denied The Board bases its decision on the following reasons The Zoning Administrator recommends denial in his memorandum dated May 24, 1982 "Section 2309c of the City's Zoning Ordinance grants dispension for lots of a substandard depth, such as the applicant's. However, the aforementioned Section specifies that no rear yard shall be less than 20 feet In addition upon looking at the enclosed Pinal County application and plot plan for the residence it Agook ( 00.1k Page 3 - Board of Adjustment Minutes of June 7, 1982 appears that the existing patio cover was built without a permit in violation of the code in effect at the time of construction. For these reasons, I recommend the requested variance =t- be denied " The motion passed 4-2-0, with Messers. Jessamine and Vaughn dissenting. (During the discussion of the motion, Mr. Berry suggested the applicant might be able to extend only the roof of the existing structure for more shade ) 27 Chairman asked staff to brief the Board on BA-4-81 (Corsi). 28. Mr Newcomer stated that complaint has been lodged against the applicant that conformance to variance stipulations was not being met 29. Chairman suggested a public hearing be scheduled so the applicant would have the opportunity to defend her- self A motion to that effect was requested 30 Burfiend/Luddy M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that an advertised public hearing be held on July 12, 1982, at 7:00 p m , in these chambers, regarding complaints against BA-4-81 (Corsi)." The motion passed 5-0-1, with Mr Vaughn dissenting. IL31 Chairman asked for further business. 32 Mr Newcomer presented the following items 1 Zoning Administrator requests that building permit requirements be attached to variance orders. 2 Board of Adjustment and Planning and Zoning six month schedules were distributed. (Third Monday in September tentatively set for regular meomNig due to Labor Day holiday ) 3. General Plan correction to amendment packet distributed. 4. Legislative Action on Open Meeting Law distributed 33. Chairman adjourned the meeting by concensus at 7 45 p.m., there being no further business Respectfully submitted, Accepted, Charles R. Newcomer essamine Executive Secretary Ch irman CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION MAGIS .TE COURT June 1982 FINANCIAL STATEMENT: INCOME: FINES $16,714.50 BONDS 1,880.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 901.00 MISC. 84.50 $19,580.00 EXPENSES: OSC TAX $ 1,583.84 ASC TAX 808.67 PAS TAX 422.67 BONDS REFUND 1,214.00 JURY FEE 144.00 FINES REFUND 23.00 PROFESSIONAL SRRVICE 1,306.00 MISC. 6.50 $ 5,508.68 NET RECEIPTS $14,071.32 FINE PAYMENTS OWED; PENDING TO DATE $48,727.08 FINE PAYMENTS: 27,327.50 WARRANTS OUTSTANDING 21 ,399.58 $48,727.08 FINES PAID OFF BY WORKING FOR CITY 3 cases $305.00 ft CII F APACHE JUNCTION MAGISTRATE eNT June, 1982 TRAFFIC• PENDING CITATIONS FORWARD 502 MONTHLY CITATIONS ISSUED 336 TOTAL 838 FINALIZED DISPOSITIONS: FINES PD WORKED FOR CITY 3 FINES PAID 217 DISMISSED 12 SUSPENDED OR PROBATION 12 TRANSFERED OUT 0 TIME SERVED 5 249 TO DATE PENDING 589 CRIMINAL: PENDING CITATIONS FORWARD 165 MONTHLY CITATIONS ISSUED 53 TOTAL 218 FINALIZED DISPOSITIONS: FINES PAID 16 DISMISSED 5 SUSPENDED OR PROBATION 9 TIME SERVED 4 WARRANTS CLOSED ( SEARCH ) 0 34 TO DATE PENDING 184 WARRANTS ( TRAFFIC & CRIMINAL ) PENDING FORWARD 369 ISSUED 65 TOTAL 434 WARRANTS CLEARED - 26 PENDING WARRANTS 408 PRE-TRIALS & TRIALS SET 45 SENTENCING & HEARINGS SET 2 PQACHE✓ ..... �• �� 1 z '1R/Z COity o 4aciean July 20, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: I CITY MANAGER �\ SUBJECT: LETTERS OF COMMENDATION Please find attached an excerpt from the May 11 , 1982 Regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting containing a recommendation to the City Council . Also attached is a letter of commendation to Mr. Gero and Mr. Newcomer. Please contact me should there be any questions. JJT/ss Ain ph. att. 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 42. Chairman requested comment by the public. ' 43. Councilman Damiano asked if parcels already Developed in the area had given dedications. 44. Chairman called for staff recommendation. 45. Mr. Gero commented that if approval of the project were recommended request for dedication and off-site improvement should be made. 46. Chairman called for a motion following Commission discussion. 47. Taylor/Hutchens M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in Pinal County case PC-PZ-14-82, application of First Avenue Financial Corporation, the Commission recommends appr,,,al with the stipulation that the DCC areas of concern mentioned in its recommendation be resolved, off- site improvements be made, permits obtained and const- ruction be in accordance with Article 20-c of the Pinal County Zoning Ordinance. " The motion passed unanimously (7-0) . 48. Chairman asked for new business. 49. Polomskey/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the follow- ing recommendation be made to the Apache Junction City Council : A letter of commendation be presented to Joseph Gero, Director of Planning, and to Charles Newcomer, Associate Planner, for their dilligent and tireless efforts toward development of our general plan. j� Although they are paid staff members, we feel that they have worked far above and beyond their duties in this endeavor. " The motion passed unanimously (7-0) . 50. Mr. Gero ex•ressed his appreciation for this •es 51. Chairman asked for further new business. 52. Mr. Gero noted arrangements need to be made concerning scheduling community meetings regarding the general plan. 53. Taylor/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commissio of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that authority be granted to the Chairman and Executive Secretary to determine a schedule for community meetings to allow discussion of the draft general plan and to advertise the dates. " The motion passed unanimously (7-0). PQACHF✓ /• i,. 1 $ 44444 O 0 gR,ZoN�...„. ) 6i o crche � )unction July 20, 1982 Joseph W. Gero Director of Planning City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Mr. Gero: The General Plan for the City of Apache Junction is a very complex, intricate document which required many hours of research, study, in depth planning, mapping, and countless hours of listening to public input. Next came the complexity of compiling this data into under- standable language laymen could comprehend. You, along with Charles Newcomer, Associate Planner, are commended for your diligent and tireless efforts that have gone above and beyond your regular duties in the development of a General Plan for which you and the City of Apache Junction can be proud. It is recognized that you both spent many hours away from your families during the preparation of the General Plan. These hours, in addition .•. to your regular work day, are indeed deeply appreciated. The City Council and City staff, along with the citizens of Apache Junction, can be proud to have dedicated people such as yourself and Mr. Newcomer. Sincerely, Wendell J. Clarke, Mayor for the City Council of Apache Junction WJC/JJt/ss 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 PQACHF✓ Irk ••• O , h (1 l»,z '9,P/Z©t,P `Oily o iliache &unction July 20, 1982 Charles Newcomer Associate Planner City of Apache Junction 1001 North Idaho Road Apache Junction, AZ 85220 Dear Mr. Newcomer: The General Plan for the City of Apache Junction is a very complex, intricate document which required many hours of research, study, in depth planning, mapping, and countless hours of listening to public input. Next came the complexity of compiling this data into under- standable language laymen could comprehend. You, along with Joseph Gero, Planning Director, are commended for your diligent and tireless efforts that have gone above and beyond your regular duties in the development of a General Plan for which you and the City of Apache Junction can be proud. It is recognized that you both spent many hours away from your families during the pre- paration of the General Plan. These hours, in addition to your regular work day, are indeed deeply appreciated. The City Council and City staff, along with the citizens of Apache Junction, can be proud to have dedicated people such as yourself and Mr. Gero. Sincerely, Wendell J. Clarke, Mayor for the City Council of Apache Junction WJC/JJT/ss 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 QACHE�G � P fi 2 a i`'g ! O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY U .0.. �Fj ii" Z "IRizoNP Witt' o c4pache 09unctian W E Mc DANIEL I\ July 8, 1982 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Director of Public Safety gfl'1 Through: City Manager Subject: Departmental Report - June 1982 Attached you will find our departmental report for June 1982. Injury and Non-injury accidents increased by 2 each over last month. Bur- glaries took a dramatic jump this month although larcenies did drop. With the economic times, coupled with summer vacation, this type of activity is sure to rise and fall as people become more active. Speed citations are up for the second month in a row, as are D.W.I. and other moving citations. Our D.W.I. activity has reached some AM\ 63% of last years activity with only 50% of the year expired. Pos- itive reaction to our grant request to the Office of Highway Safety will further impact this D.W.I. activity and follow the mandate of the Arizona State Legislature. Animal Control activity is as follows: Complaints: 90 Impound Fees: $108.00 License Fees: 130.00 Total June 238.00 Deposited to General Fund Total from May 3006.00 $3244.00 Deposited to General Fund 1-1-82 through 6-30-82 1001 NORTH IDAHO RD.•POST OFFICE BOX K,APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220•TELEPHONE(602)982-8260 2 Impounded Adopted Dogs 92 28 Cats 138 3 Destroyed In Pound at End of Month Dogs 51 19 Cats 114 21 Dog Licenses Sold to Date 1982 Licenses: 618 Kennel Permits Sold to Date 4 Citations Issued Dog Running at Large: 0 Unlicensed Dog: 0 1, • APACHE JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT Departmental Activity JAN. FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT OCT. NOV. DEC. TOTAL ACCIDENTS * 961 32 13 12 15 7 9 88 * 961 Accident-No Injury S 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 962 Accident-Injury AL 0 0 0 1 0 - 0 1 963 Accident-Fatality 962 22 14 2 7 5 7 S7 P Persons Injured P 40 18 7 16 8 11 100 or Killed S 1 3 0 2 0 2 8 S Speed Related AL 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 AL Alcohol Related 963 0 0 0 0 Ou 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC CITATIONS SPEED 55 71 86 71 96 114 493 ALCOHOL 25 19 18 16 17 20 115 OTHER 139 96 110 95 99 112 651 INDEX CRIMES MURDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 BURGLARY 11 8 17 11 7 16 70 AG. ASSAULT 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 1 4 2 4 1 5 17 LARCENY 35 28 34 43 34 26 200 ARSON C. R. T. HITS FELONY 1 7 4 3 1 2 18 I Icrenr•ror,ano 11 11 96 5 12 11 7R 1 (§AC HF U 1 ' Z gRiZoNP c 'ily o �pac�Ce unction July 14, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: \ JAMES TUVELL, JR. , CITY MANAGER FROM: i JOE GERO, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SUBJECT: MINUTES TRANSMITTAL Attached are copies of the approved Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission for its regular meeting of June 8, 1982, and special meeting of June 29, 1982. Please have them placed in the "Minutes Book" in the City Clerk' s office. JWG:rlb Attch. .-. 1001 NORTH IDAHO • APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA 85220-0190 • TELEPHONE(602)982-8002 II 183 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD SPECIAL MEETING - GENERAL PLAN JUNE 29, 1982 7.00 P.M. Present Absent Guests Amok Mr. Hall Mr Oltman See Attendance Sheet Mr Hutchens Ms Taylor Mr Kell Mr. Baljo Mr McPherson (7.50) Ms. Baker, Chairman Mr. Gero, Executive Secretary Ms Breece, Recording Secretary Councilman Steelsmith, Liaison Mr. Tuvell , City Manager Mr. Polomskey Synopsis Apache Junction 2001 General Plan (Recommended approval by City Council) Special meeting scheduled for July 27, 1982 1 Chairman called the meeting to order at 7.20 p.m., after the Invocation had been offered by Mr Kell and Mr Hutchens had led the Pledge of Allegiance The recording secretary was asked to call the roll. 2 Ms Breece called the roll determining five members were present and four absent. Mr. McPherson arrived later to be the sixth member present as indicated above 3. Chairman requested a motion for approval of the agenda 4 Hutchens/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the agenda be approved as presented." 00116, The motion passed unanimously (5-0) 5. Chairman opened the public hearing of the Apache Junction general plan and asked staff to brief the Commission 6. Mr. Gero entered the following into the public record: The general plan process began September 12, 1979, by direction of the City Council to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the City Manager and staff Instruction was given to pursue a grant, and the consequent Four Corners Regional Commission grant enabled the city to hire an engineering firm, PRC Toups, to conduct various re- quired studies. Those studies include "Population Analysis of the City of Apache Junction," "Water Systems Evaluation for Apache Junction, Arizona," "Sewage Disposal Alternatives for Apache Junction, Arizona," and through PRC Voorhees, a "Transportation Plan for Apache lr Junction " Through a separate contract with the city, PRC Toups completed a "City Complex Planning Program for Apache Junction, Arizona." On November 9, 1981, the original proposed plan entitled "Apache Junction 2001: Apache Junction, Arizona, General Plan" was presented. There are maps attached to that report and it references each of the aforementioned elements In addition, it includes a master plan - - f -- 185 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING) JUNE 29, 1982 PAGE TWO for Section 16 state lands within the city limits of Apache Junction On November 19, the city staff provided the first 60-day notice as required by ARS Section 9-461-05, filing copies of the plan with Maricopa and Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commissions, Maricopa and Pinal County Boards of Supervisors, City of Mesa, Maricopa Asso fits - ciation of Governments, Central Arizona Association of Governments, I and the Arizona Office of Economic Planning and Development Other interested agencies receiving file copies of the plan include State Land Department, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Department of Transportation, Department of Water Resources, Maricopa Flood Control District, Pinal County Health Department, and copies have been placed on file in the City Clerk's office, city library, and planning office. Copies and summaries have been available on request throughout this time period Meetings with special interest groups, and open houses and worksessions have been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission Previous public hearings of the general plan have been held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, the City Council remanding the original proposal to the Commission for further study By Commission direction, city staff provided the second 60-day review period notice to the aforementioned agencies Public hearing notice was provided fifteen days prior to the hearing, as required The current proposal does have several amendments 1) Land Use Map, 2) Figure G-4 technical change per comments by Bureau of Land Management, 3) Page 2-2 and Addendum 2-22A, Page 2-41, and a clerical error correction renumbering Pages 2-42 through 2-45 to 2-43 through • 2-45A On the new Page 2-43, a line in the fourth paragraph was omitted Corrected, it reads "Area I should have a minimum zoning lot size of one acre or an equivalent of the 1k-acre lot, less any right-of-way easements " Changes on Page 2-6 and an additional Page 2-50A, Page 5-9, 5-9A, and 6-5, these are the pages that have changes proposed in them from the original draft The plan is as originally proposed with those page changes, plus those map changes, plus the land use map change as noted. During the course of the notice periods, we have received letters from Lawrence White and others, Jim Swanson in behalf of Superstition Horsemen's Association, Beulah Matthews, Don Cox, Jan Hiller for the Chamber of Commerce, Bill Matthews for the Maricopa Flood Control essr District, DaleBuskirk for the Arizona Department of Transportation, James Karam, Jr., District 2 Supervisor of Pinal County, Phil Hogue who is chairman of the Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission, Ron Edwards of Arizona Department of Transportation, Dean Sloan who is Public Works Manager of Mesa, Clay Worst in behalf of Mrs Clara Carney, Bill Beaulieu, Phil Goldsberry for Central Arizona Association of Governments, Dudley Onderdonk of Maricopa County Planning Department, Wayne Balmer of the City of Mesa Planning Department, Fred Wurst and others representing homeowners in the outlying areas to the east and north of the city, Roadhaven, Inc , Arizona State Land Department, and the Bureau of Land Management. Presented is Proposed Resolution 82-1 which would adopt the general plan Areas of existing zoning of a high density classification indicated on the Land Use Map as the Commission requested, over,rare looked high density areas are indicated on the copies before the membership Also, Roadhaven, Inc., has submitted a letter requesting high density designation for a particular area State Parks Department proposes to acquire a portion of land and it is suggested that area be designated open space. Also, a letter from the State Land Department, 1 signed by Mr. Robert Lane, the acting state land commissioner, requests the paragraph concerning transfer of density be rewritten using that department's language. Staff recommends this be done 9 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING) JUNE 29, 1982 PAGE THREE 7. Chairman called on Roadhaven's representative to explain the request submitted by them. 8. John Fallon introduced himself as representing Mr Bidwell A'\ who is out of the country at this time. He offered to answer Commission inquiries 9 Mr. Gero pointed out that, by his calculations, Roadhaven could obtain its objective with the current designation of medium density, high density as requested may not be necessary He suggested this issue be discussed with Roadhaven staff prior to the City Council public hearing of the general plan; the matter could be resolved 10 Chairman called for public comment in favor of the plan 11. Jim Swanson introduced himself as representing the Superstition Horsemen's Association. Noted the water and sewer studies support the plan as proposed, plan review is scheduled within the text of the plan, and most importantly the overwhelming public support of the 11-acre minimum parcels in the outlying areas and the eastern sections along the city border except as noted on the Land Use Map He stated that that is the most overwhelming argument in support of the plan Because of these items, the Superstition Horsemen's Association encourages approval of the general plan and recommends its adoption by the City Council. 12. Richard J Herbert of Phoenix introduced himself as an Apache Junction landowner He asked that the node at Broadway Avenue and San Marcos Drive be designated a local commercial opportunity area 13 Chairman requested further comment in favor or opposition Ark of the plan, there was none. Staff summary was requested 14 Mr Gero recommended amendment of the paragraph pertaining to transfer of density according to State Land Department request, the Land Use Map be amended as indicated in the packet materials, and any changes the Commission desires based on information heard during the public hearing 15. Chairman closed the public hearing and asked for Commission discussion 16 Mr Kell asked for Mr Gero's opinion, as city planner, of the request by Mr Herbert for a local commercial node 17 Mr Gero stated there would be no objection to it from a planning standpoint 18 Chairman called for a motion. 19 Kell/Hutchens M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, 187 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING) JUNE 29, 1982 PAGE FOUR that Apache Junction 2001, also known as Resolution No 82-1, be recommended for approval by the Apache Junction City Council with the following amendments: 1) Rewording of Section 16 paragraph per State Land Department recommendation, 2) Land Use Map changes as indicated in the Commission packets (generally, housecleaning measures for zoning that already exists), 3) Local Commercial Opportunity Area by Planned Development for the node on Broadway Avenue and San Marcos Drive " The motion passed unanimously (6-0). 20. Chairman called for further business. 21 Mr Gero presented the need for a special meeting of the Commission in July and recommended the 27th after having polled the membership for its preference. 22 Hutchens/Hall M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that a special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission is hereby called for July 27, 1982, at 7 30 p m The executive secretary shall publish in advance the agenda which may include any street abandonment cases and rezoning applications which are complete and staffed in sufficient time to be prepared and distributed to said Commission for its consideration " The motion passed unanimously (6-0). 23 Chairman recognized Dan Andrews who commended the Commission for its efforts in developing a good, workable plan that gives a rural lifestyle Motion to adjourn was then requested by the chairman. 24. Kell/Hutchens M/S to adjourn, there being no objection, the meeting adjourned by concensus Respectfully submitted, Accepted, Josepl W Gero Mildred Baker fExecutive Secretary Acting Chairman 1 .. 207 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING) JUNE 29, 1982 PAGE FIVE .. rA ATTENDANCE SHEET 'q Barbara Rose Mary Warren David Evans Teresa Sherwood I Mildred Evans Jim Swanson Annabelle Richards Robert L Nuth Loretta Andrews Richard B. Hogue, Jr Dan Andrews Tina M. Kolar Jon Iger Ellen Durkin Roy Dale Byrne Paul Durkin Grace Fullenwider Pamela Bell Carl Fullenwider Carl Otherson, Sr Nancy Koerner Velma Otherson Larry White Patsy Otherson William Daniels Richard Herbert Dorothy Daniels Dorothy Morrison Mary Ireland Harvey Morrison Terry Ireland Virginia Raymond Joan M. Gironda Robert Raymond John Fallon Michael E Fitzwater John Gironda Catherine L Fitzwater Alice Staples Hank Steelsmith, Councilman • 1 ,.. / 165 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1001 NORTH IDAHO ROAD APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA JUNE 8, 1982 7 30 P M Present Absent Guests ( Mr Kell Mr Hall Mr Hutchens Thelma Seaton �\ Mr. Oltman R C Seaton Mr. Polomskey Ms. Baker Michael E. Nesser Mr McPherson Margaret Nesser Ms. Taylor A E. Sullivan Mr Baljo, Chairman Laura Sullivan Mr Gero, Executive Secretary Bill Beaulieu Ms. Breece, Recording Secretary Lu Beaulieu R C Haas Synopsis John Peed Robert Peed Minutes of May 11, 1982, accepted Gladys Noble PZ-25-81 (Matousek) - Denial recommended Ann Bogarts PZ-8-82 (Peed) - Continued to July 13, 1982 Mike Kovacs PZ-9-82 (Currie) - Approval recommended Hal Cochran AB-82-6 (Kovacs) - Continued to August 10, 1982 R James Smets PZ-10-82 (Kovacs) - Approval recommended Leroy E Clay AB-82-1 (White/McMillan) - Approval recommended July 13 Worksession Scheduled 1 Chairman called the meeting to order after the Invocation was offered by Mrs Taylor and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited The recording secretary was asked IL to call the roll 2. Ms Breece called the roll , determining six members were present and three absent, as indicated above 3. Chairman called for a motion to approve the agenda. 4. McPherson/Oltman M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the agenda be approved as presented " The motion passed unanimously (6-0) 5. Chairman called for a motion to approve the Minutes dated May 11, 1982. 6 Kell/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the Minutes dated May 11, 1982, be approved as presented The motion passed 5-0-1, with Mr. Baljo abstaining due to his absence at that meeting 7 Chairman opened the continuation of the public hearing on PZ-25-81 (Matousek) and asked staff to brief the Commission 8 Mr Gero explained that this case was continued from the February 9 and April 13, 1982, meetings, that re- zoning by planned development had been considered by the applicant, but ultimately conventional rezoning was retained as in the original application of November 1981. Askj t�7 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 PAGE TWO 9 Chairman invited the applicant to speak 10. Mr. Matousek introduced himself and stated that planned development was rejected by him due to the cost involved He asked the Commission to consider his request for conventional rezoning. 11. Chairman asked for public comment in favor or opposition to the application, there was none Staff was asked to summarize 12 Mr Gero presented the DCC recommendation for denial , although the DCC would be receptive to reviewing a planned development. 13 Chairman closed the public hearing and called for Commission deliberation 14 Mr McPherson asked if the applicant had investigated the regulations concerning commercial well installation. 15 Mr Gero referred to a memorandum dated March 25, 1982, from the city attorney stating that new commercial use may not drill and operate an on-site water well and presenting rationale. Mr. Matousek had indicated he had received contrary information from the Depart- ment of Water Resources 16. Chairman called for a motion IL 17 Kell/Oltman M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-25-81, also known as Proposed Ordinance No 129, application of Vincent Matousek for his property described as the West § of the Northwest 1 of the Northeast I of the Northwest 1 of Section 15, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Amok Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, EXCEPT that portion southeast of the centerline of State Route 88, requesting rezoning from CR-1 Single Residence zone to CB-2 General Business zone, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the denial of said application. The reasons for the recommendation are 1) The DCC recommends denial because of land use transition and access questions, and 2) Access difficulties to the property support denial " The motion passed unanimously (6-0). 18. Chairman asked staff to brief the Commission on PZ-8-82 (Peed) 19 Mr. Gero detailed the rezoning request to expand the KOA area, including petition of opposition with twenty-four (24) signatures (Of the twenty (20) properties within 300' of the subject property, three (3) were repre- sented on the petition ) The signatures would not invoke the special City Council vote requirement oink 1.l)O 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 PAGE THREE 20. Chairman invited the applicant to speak 21. John Peed introduced himself as owner of the KOA park He explained the reason for the rezoning request { and outlined the proposed KOA expansion �� tt 22. Chairman asked the Commission members if they had questions for the applicant 23 Ms Taylor asked how many additional spaces would be involved 24. J. Peed replied thatthe number was undetermined due to topographic considerations 25. Chairman requested public comment in favor, there was none Public comment in opposition was requested. 26. Mary Nesser introduced herself as a resident within close proximity of the subject property. She stated other residents in the area had signed a petition in opposition of the requested rezoning She objected to the KOA lighting and noise generated from the park. 27 Chairman asked staff for summary. 28. Mr. Gero presented the DCC comment (no objection, no recommendation) 29 Chairman asked for rebuttal by the applicant 30 Robert Peed introduced himself as co-owner of KOA and rezoning applicant. He stated he had approached Ms Nesser in an attempt to resolve any conflict with neighboring property owners He described the lighting as standard, and stated that dirt bikes are not allowed to be ridden in the park, a playgound and swimming pool are located strategically to alleviate noise 31 Chairman asked staff if assurances by the applicant could be enforced 32 Mr. Gero explained that the city can only enforce stipulations to rezoning by planned development. 33 Mr Kell suggested the applicant consider planned development in this case to resolve pertinent issues. 34 R. Peed said he would be willing to pursue planned development investigation 35 Chairman called a ten-minute recess to allow the applicant to review the planned development ordinance When the meeting reconvened, the applicant was invited to continue r 36 R Peed deferred to Mr. Bill Beaulieu 37. Mr. Beaulieu introduced himself as intermediary between Mr Peed and the current owner of the subject property. • He made the Commission aware that time was a factor due to the pending status of the sale of this property to Mr Peed t � f t PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 PAGE FOUR 38. McPherson/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that the public hearing of case PZ-8-82, application of Robert Peed, be continued to the July 13, 1982, meeting of the Commission, in the Council Chambers." The motion passed unanimously (6-0) 39 Chairman asked staff to brief the Commission on the next case, PZ-9-82 (Currie) 40 Mr Gero presented the case meeting all administrative re- quirements 41. Chairman invited the applicant to speak 42. A E Sullivan introduced himself as the applicant's representative, and offered to answer questions 43 Chairman invited public comment in favor of the application, there was none Public comment in opposition was requested. 44. Mr Leroy Clay introduced himself and stated objection to the rezoning if it would effect GR privileges of his adjacent property. 45 Chairman called for staff summary 46. Mr. Gero stated the DCC has no objection if the 50' right-of-way is dedicated on both Broadway Avenue and Tomahawk Road 47. Chairman called for a motion 48 Taylor/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-9-82, also known as Proposed /'l\ Ordinance No 147, application of Mary Currie for her property described as the Southwest I of the Southwest * of the Southwest I of the Southwest of Section 22, Township 1 North, Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, ;r >- x requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CR-5 Multiple Residence zone, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application Stipulations include 1) dedication of fifty feet (50') of right-of-way on East Broadway Avenue, and 2) dedication of fifty feet (50') of right-of-way on South Tomahawk Road. The reason for the recommendation is that it is the highest and best use of the land " The motion passed unanimously (6-0) 49 Chairman asked staff to brief the Commission on the next case AB-82-6 (Kovacs). • 17S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 PAGE FIVE 50 Mr. Gero explained the applicant requestsan extension to gather signatures lk 51. Oltman/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, /oN "Y I that the public hearing of case AB-82-6, application of Mike Kovacs and others to abandon certain portions of East Sixth Avenue and South Padre Road, be con- tinued to 7 30 p m , August 10, 1982, in these chambers." The motion passed unanimously (6-0). 52. Chairman opened the public hearing on PZ-10-82 (Kovacs) Staff was directed to brief the Commission. 53 Mr Gero outlined the request and met all administrative requirements 54 Chairman invited the applicant to speak 55 Mike Kovacs introduced himself and stated that his intentions are to build an office complex and offered to answer questions 56 Chairman asked for public comment in favor or opposition, there was none Staff summary was requested 57 Mr. Gero presented the DCC comment (no objection to the IL application) 58 Chairman called for a motion following Commission deliberation 59. McPherson/Taylor M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in rezoning case PZ-10-82, also known as Proposed Ordinance No. 148, application of Michael Kovacs for his property described as the West 2 of the Southeast of the Southeast /`k of the Southwest ;, lying north of the centerline of U.S Highway 60, Section 21, Township 1 North, • Range 8 East, Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, located in Apache Junction, Pinal County, Arizona, - ! requesting rezoning from GR General Rural to CB-2 General Business zone, the Commission recommends to the Apache Junction City Council the approval of said application The reason for the recommendation is that this is the highest and best use of the subject property due to highway frontage " The motion passed unanimously (6-0) f_ 60 Chairman asked staff to brief the Commission on AB-82-1 (White/McMillan) 61 Mr. Gero noted the applicant is planning to dedicate addi- • tional right-of-way with corner turns as requested by the city. Total dedications will bring all roadways up to city requirements Two options (Resolution 82-26 and Resolution 82-32) were pre- sented to the Commission, original request submitted o 1-77 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 PAGE SIX it by applicant, and another plan attempting to resolve a4 objections by adjacent property owners 62. Chairman invited applicant to speak 63 Hal Cochrane introduced himself as the applicant's representative 1 and offered to answer questions 64 Jim Smets introduced himself as engineer for the development and stated the client preferred the original plan due to the technical layout 65. Chairman called for public comment in favor, there was none. Public comment in opposition was requested (Letter from Thelma Thexton expressing opposition was recorded.) 66 Selma Seaton introduced herself and expressed concern that access for emergency vehicles would be eliminated in the original plan, but the second plan would be acceptable She suggested this alternative would be acceptable to Ms Thexton, too 67. Chairman asked for staff summary. 68 Mr Gero presented DCC request that no half-streets be abandoned, noted that less than that advertised may be abandoned, and requested dedication of rights-of-way. The DCC had no objection to the request, subject to the desires of adjacent property owners and subject to dedication of rights-of-way 69 Chairman called for a motion 70 McPherson/Kell M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that in abandonment case AB-82-1, application of Roger and Joyce Gupton and John Hirambasic, the Commission recommends the abandonment in accordance with Resolution No. 82-32 in order to provide con- tinuity to the property and yet reserve the rights of the property owners to the north " The motion passed unanimously (6-0). 71. Chairman continued to the next item of business, Pinal County case PZ-9-82 (Noble). Staff was directed to brief ,r- > the Commission 72 Mr Gero presented the case meeting all administrative re- quirements 73. Chairman invited the applicant to speak. r 74 Gladys Noble introduced herself and stated she had no additional information 75 Chairman called for public comment in favor or opposition; there was none Staff summary was requested. 76 Mr Gero pointed out that, should the Commission decide to recommend approval, off-site improvements need to be requred due to the property fronting an arterial, and the state should be consulted due to the proposed freeway off-ramp. ( PlIS 175 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 8, 1982 PAGE SEVEN '"ems 77. Chairman called for a motion. 78 Kell/McPherson M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning `# ` Commission of City of Apache Junction, Arizona, { that in Pinal County case PZ-9-82, application I{ of David Noble, the Commission recommends to the Amok ! Pinal County Planning and Zoning Commission the approval of said application. Stipulations of approval include requirement of all off-site improvements due to the fact that the property fronts an arterial just below a proposed freeway ramp The reason for this recommendation is that this appears to be the highest and best use of the subject property " The motion passed unanimously (6-0). 79. Chairman called on staff for "New Business " 80. Mr Gero asked if the Commission wished to have a worksession at its next meeting, announced general plan open houses, and distributed Board of Adjustment and Planning and Zoning Commission six-month schedules. 81 McPherson/Polomskey M/S "BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, that a worksession is hereby called to review I, agenda materials, at 7 00 p m , Tuesday, July 13, 1982, in these City Council Chambers." The motion passed 5-0-1, with Mr Kell dissenting. 82 Chairman called for adjournment, there being no further business. There being no objection, the meeting was adjourned by concensus at 10.35 p.m Respectfully submitted, Acc pg ted, ;�rl € -- ` �' J f�1"t • • '•'' Joseph W Gero j eor9 e 1 0, Executive Secretary Chairman i CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JULY 6, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT THE AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 15, 1982, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT THE PROPOSED USES OF THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS, BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED. (motion carried. ) C.M. Action Completed. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, FULLY ADOPTING ESTIMATES OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BY THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1 , 1982, AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1983; DECLARING THAT SUCH SHALL ESTABLISH THE BUDGET OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. (motion carried. ) C.M. Posted 7/7/82 THAT ORDINANCE NO. 151, BE READ BY TITLE ONLY , AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT ORDINANCE NO. 151 , AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYO° AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, ADDING CHAPTER 3 & 4 TO THE CITY CODE OF APACHE JUNCTION (VOLUME II - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE) PERTAINING TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN WHICH CHAPTER 3 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND CHAPTER 4 CONTAINS SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND Published 7/12 - 7/16/82 UTILITIES, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. C.C. Posted 7/7/82 (motion carried. ) Plannin! THAT ITEMS 9a AND 9b BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. THAT THE RESIGNATIONS FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION , SUBMITTED BY MS DEDE SCHE F AND MR. PHIL RICHARDSON, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET. (motion carried. ) C.C. Action Completed. THAT THE RESIGNATION FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, SUBMITTED BY MS SANDRA OBERG, BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET. (motion carried. ) C.C. Action Completed. THAT ITEM NOS. 10a, lOb, 10c, AND 10d, BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. (motion carried. ) Action Completed. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JULY 6, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT MILDRED BAKER, JOHN P. HUTCHENS, AND RON KELL, BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. (motion was not seconded. ) Motion not seconded. THAT GARY PAGE, RICHARD SANCHEZ, AND MILDRED BAKER, BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION , ARIZONA, SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. (motion carried. ) C.C. Appointees notified. THAT PRICILLA GARDNER, AND LAWRENCE LEPIC, BE APPOINTED TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSION , SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985, AND S. PATRICK BERGERE, BE APPOINTED AS AN EX OFFICIO MEMBERS SAID TERM TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1983. (motion carried. ) C.C. Appointees notified. THAT LILLIAN CASTRO, AND DONALD TAYLOR, BE APPOINTED TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, SAID TERMS TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. (motion carried. ) C.C. Appointees notified. THAT HARVEY MORRISON, BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, SAID TERM TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, ,•� AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1984, AND MARY LUDDY, AND DIANA DUNLOP, BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, SAID TERM TO BEGIN JULY 7, 1982, AND TO EXPIRE JUNE 30, 1985. (motion carried. ) C.C. Appointees notified. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-45, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA, RECOGNIZING ARIZONA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. , AS THE LOCAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE COORDINATING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES §36-2210, BE AND HEREBY IS, Posted 7/7/82 APPROVED. (motion carried. ) C.M. THAT RESOLUTION NO. 82-47, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON BROADWAY AVENUE, BETWEEN TOMAHAWK AND GOLDFIELD ROADS, BE AND HEREBY IS, APPROVED. Posted 7/7/82 (motion carried. ) P.S. CITY COUNCIL MOTIONS MEETING OF JULY 6, 1982 ACTION MOTION AGENCY DISPOSITION THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND A WORK SESSION BE HELD AT THE CITY HALL COMPLEX ON JULY 20, 1982. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 7/13/82 I� THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD ON MONDAY, JULY 19, 1982, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 7/13/82 THAT A WORK SESSION BE HELD WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON AUGUST 4, 1982, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BUILDING. (motion carried. ) C.C. Posted 7/13/82 THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. (motion carried. ) Action Completed THAT COUNCILMAN HUDSON BE APPOINTED AS LIAISON ON SWIMMING POOL FUND. (motion carried. ) Action Completed CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS MEETING OF May 18, 1982 ACTION REQUEST AGENCY DISPOSITION 3/2/82 THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO CHECK Auditors checking with Audito', INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF USING 10% OF EXCESS General 's Office. BUILDING FEES TO GO TO THE SWIMMING POOL FUND. (Mayor Clarke) C.M. THAT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FURTHER STUDY .-. NOISE PROBLEM CREATED BY DOG POUND AND PRESENT ALTERNATIVES AND COSTS AT NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. (Councilman Damiano and Councilman Steelsmith) P.S. In holding pattern. 3/16/82 THAT APPROPRIATE STAFF STUDY PRESENT SIGN REGULATIONS AND DRAFT A SIGN ORDINANCE. (Councilman Steelsmith) Planning 5/18/82 THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF TO WORK WITH NECESSARY OFFICIALS AND AGENCIES TO PUSH FOR EXTENSION OF SUPERSTITION FREEWAY. Coordinating with League of (Councilman Eidson) C.M. Cities. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF TO DISPLAY PHOTOGRAPHS OF ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. (Vice Mayor Hill ) C.C. Awaiting processing of photographs. THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF TO POST NAME PLATES FOR ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS ON DOOR TO Action completed 7/6/82. COUNCIL OFFICE. (Councilman Shanks) C.C. plates and holders ordered 5/21/82. THAT COUNCILMAN HUDSON BE APPOINTED TO THE • SWIMMING POOL FUND COMMITTEE. (Mayor Clarke) Appointed at 7/6/82 meeting. THAT CITY MANAGER CHECK INTO GETTING A NEW SIGN Public Works has been di"'"*‘tec FOR APACHE JUNCTION LIBRARY. C.M. to construction and insta1i an appropriate sign. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS ACTION NOT COMPLETED MEETING ACTION DATE REQUEST AGENCY STATUS 1/5/82 THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY DIRECT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FURTHER STUDY THE QUESTION OF ANNEXATION OF THE PROPOSED AIRPORT PROPERTY AND REPORT TO THE COUNCIL THEIR FINDINGS WITHIN THE P.W. Due date extended at the NEXT SIX MONTHS. (motion carried. ) Planning 6/1/82 Council work session. ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES ITEM II MEETING OF MOTION BY: Gr%rn SECONDED BY: Cl-d-Sab YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN EIDSON COUNCILMAN DAMIANO MAYOR CLARKE !� COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ,COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN HUDSON Y VICE_ MAYOR HILL UNANIMOUS 1 IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES Pt u)/" ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY SECONDED BY ))/1_ YE NO ABSTAINED MAYOR CI ARKE COUNCILMAN Dp.M IANO (/ CQ.UNC_II AN STEELSMIT ii CflUNC i I MAN HUDSON __CIIIJN(`iI P"4N SHANKS COUNCILMAN FIDSON VICE MAYOR HILL J UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED TOTAL ROLL CALL VOTE SHEET NOTES 0 O'N (2() ITEM # MEETING OF MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: i;C:1- YES NO ABSTAINED COUNCILMAN SHANKS J COUNCILMAN) DAMIANO COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH V VICE MAYOR HILL COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN EIDSON MAYOR CLARKE UNANI"^.O S IN FAVOR OPPOSED I ABSTAINED TOTAL • a ITEM NO . 16 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED AT P. M. . ROLL CALL ROLL CALL PRESENT I ABSENT MAYOR CLAR W.S. W.S. KE ✓ VICE-MAYOR HILL I i✓ I COUNCILMAN EIDSON ! ✓ COUNCILMAN HUDSON COUNCILMAN SHANKS COUNCILMAN STEELSMITH ✓ i COUNCILMAN DAfIANO V TOTAL I / STAFF PRESENT W.S. ir CITY MANAGER JAMES TUVELL t/ CITY CLERK Kathy Connelly 1,7 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Joe Gero ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFTEY Bill McDaniel • ✓ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Rich Broman CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Alexande Mr. Hirsch OTHER