Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-06-15 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 15, 2010 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on June 15, 2010, at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Insalaco called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Councilmember Coleman gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Wilson led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present:Mayor Insalaco Councilmember Barker (telephonically) Councilmember Coleman Councilmember Dietz Councilmember Serdy Councilmember Wilson Staff Present: (Vice Mayor Eck was absent.) City Manager George Hoffman Assistant City Manager Bryant Powell City Clerk Kathleen Connelly City Attorney Joel Stern Public Safety Director Jerald Monahan Public Works Director David Fern Planning Manager Fred Baker Economic Development Director Steve Filipowicz REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 1 OF 17 Others Present:Assistant to the City Manager Ruth Giese City Magistrate James Hazel Business Advocate Janine Solley Assistant Planner Yanet Ochoa ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA )Councilmember Dietz MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED; AND THAT WALTER SWITZER BE APPOINTED AS A PRO-TEM CITY MAGISTRATE FOR THE TERM OF JULY 1, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012; AND THAT THE APPOINTMENT BE EFFECTIVE FOR SAID TERM AFTER THE EXECUTION OF THE OATH OF OFFICE; AND THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN FOR THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY MAGISTRATE JAMES W. HAZEL, JR. AND THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR A TERM FROM JUNE 15, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 15, 2014; AND THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT PENDING APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN FOR THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY MANAGER GEORGE R. HOFFMAN AND THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION; AND THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT PENDING FINAL APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10-21, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE CITY'S POLICY ON NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING FOR PUBLIC STREETS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS BY REPEALING THE EXISTING POLICY IN ITS ENTIRETY, ORIGINALLY ADOPTED UNDER RESOLUTION NO. 99-08; AND ADOPTING A REVISED POLICY, BE APPROVED; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10-22, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE GILA RIVER COMMUNITY FOR PROPOSITION 202 FUNDS, BE APPROVED; AND THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10-24, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH SUPERSTITION MOUNTAIN MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, BE APPROVED. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 2 OF 17 Councilmember Coleman SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:Unanimous. The motion carried. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS None. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CURRENT EVENTS None. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager George Hoffman commented on the one night free seminar of award -winning business coach Dan Creed available to local businesses. PUBLIC HEARINGS RESOLUTION NO. 10-15, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EXPANSION OF A PARKING LOT/RESOLUTION NO. 10-14, AMEND THE APPROVED FOOTHILLS SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSISTENT WITH PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT ALLOWING PARKING LOT EXPANSION/ORDINANCE NO. 1363, MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE FOOTHILLS SUBDIVISION AND A REZONING FOR ONE ACRE OF LAND FROM CR-S/PD TO CR-3 )Assistant Planner Yanet Ochoa briefed the council on the items. Councilmember Wilson asked who would be building the 6' wall. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 3 OF 17 Assistant Planner Yanet Ochoa stated the subdivision will have its own 6' perimeter wall.The parking lot will also have a 6' perimeter wall. Councilmember Wilson asked if there will be two walls back to back. Assistant Planner Yanet Ochoa stated there will be one wall. Councilmember Wilson asked who would be building the original wall. There was general discussion. It was determined the parking lot would build the wall on the north side. Mayor Insalaco opened the public hearing on the item.There being no one wishing to speak, he closed the public hearing and reopened the item to council discussion.There being no further discussion, he called for a motion. Councilmember Coleman MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, CASE NO. CUP -1-10, TO ALLOW THE APACHE JUNCTION HEALTH CENTER, LOCATED AT 2012 WEST SOUTHERN AVENUE, APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, A PARKING LOT EXPANSION FOR THEIR FACILITY, BE APPROVED. Councilmember Dietz SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:Unanimous. The motion carried. Councilmember Coleman MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10-14, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FOOTHILLS SUBDIVISION, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, PROPOSED IN CASE SD -1-07 BY CENTURION REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 4 OF 17 SERVICE CORPORATION AND DAVID SALCEDA, REPRESENTED BY JEFF GILES, BE APPROVED. Councilmember Dietz SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:Unanimous. The motion carried. Councilmember Coleman MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1363 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilmember Barker SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:Unanimous. The motion carried. City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read the ordinance by title only. Councilmember Coleman MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1363, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilmember Dietz SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:Unanimous. The motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 10-17, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE FISCAL YEAR 2010 BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 5 OF 17 )Public Safety Director Jerald Monahan briefed the council on the item.The grant is for electronic citation units. Councilmember Dietz commented he thinks they are great and will save a lot of money. Mayor Insalaco opened the public hearing on the item.There being no one wishing to speak, he closed the public hearing and reopened the item to council discussion.There being no further discussion, he called for a motion. Councilmember Dietz MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10-17, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSAL FOR EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT ("JAG") PROGRAM (FY 2010) FUNDS; AND APPOINTING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO CONDUCT ALL NEGOTIATIONS AND EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBMITTAL, BE APPROVED. Councilmember Coleman SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:Unanimous. The motion carried. PROPOSED MEDIACOM CABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT )City Attorney Joel Stern briefed the council on the item. Mayor Insalaco commented this is just for the cable.We have no control over the phone or the internet. City Attorney Joel Stern stated that is correct.Under federal law, they cannot regulate internet or phone.It is prohibited. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 6 OF 17 Mayor Insalaco asked even if it comes through the same cable. City Attorney Joel Stern stated that is correct.They talked about it all being connected last night.It is correct that it is all the same wires, but they cannot regulate those two areas of their business.As the law progresses into the future, there will probably be more restrictions on cable.His recommendation is to take this deal.It is the best deal they will get under the current federal and state law with the city ordinance that is in place. Mayor Insalaco commented he has been working on this for a long time. City Attorney Joel Stern stated the council has been involved in it also.He appreciated their cooperation in it. Mayor Insalaco commented he knows that he and Councilmember Serdy have a problem with there not being any local phone number.He knows there is a new technology with call centers all over the world.But then there is a problem here and you call somebody in Tennessee or Iowa and they have no idea where Apache Junction is. City Attorney Joel Stern stated if the mayor wants to place this on the record, he thinks Mr. Pecora is here tonight.He could address those issues publicly and put it on the record.It is a public hearing.He is not listed on the agenda, so they could open up the public hearing and he can come and speak if the council likes.He does not know if he filled out a request. Councilmember Barker commented the city attorney had given them a cost of approximately $10,000 to $15,000 for phase two alone.She asked about the time it would take to do that kind of survey. City Attorney Joel Stern stated there would be a time assessment.The estimate would probably be 4 to 5 months just for that assessment report.It REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 7 OF 17 could be done quicker, dependent upon if you pay more.He believes that is how it works in the cable industry.They would have to pay for some experts to come up with criteria of some kind.It has been done in other cities, but we have negotiated this thus far.He recommends that they take this deal. Councilmember Barker asked how the other cities did after their surveys were done. City Attorney Joel Stern stated he had not checked every city in the country.However, some cities do better with a needs assessment, other times the cable company does better.It depends upon the city and if there is competition in the city.Sometimes there is not just one license agreement.In a large city, there could be several. It depends on the circumstances and the public's interest in the item.There may be surveys that go out and they might get 10% responding who got the survey.It is not as good as the census, but it depends on the public input. Councilmember Wilson commented there were some questions they had on some of their facilities when they started this whole matter.He asked if they will be doing spot checks to assure they are still maintaining what they are supposed to be maintaining, such as the dropped lines. City Attorney Joel Stern stated they can do that.Under the agreement, there is a report that has to be generated every quarter on the maintenance log, what has been fixed and what needs to be fixed.Mr. Pecora can address that issue; he is the best manager of Mediacom that he has ever worked with at the local level.He is more responsive than any one that he has ever seen.He thinks Mr. Powell will agree with that. Councilmember Serdy commented he wanted it on record how disappointed he is of their refusal to try to get a guide channel on.Every time it was brought up, they would change the subject saying the TV Guide raised their rates.They were not asking for the TV Guide channel, which is an actual channel.One has no idea what they are watching if they are a basic subscriber.They could be in the middle of a REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 8 OF 17 movie and they do not know what it is.They cannot go to it with basic.If they are a premium subscriber, they can.All we asked for was the scrolling subtitle of what it is that one is watching and what will be on next.,He did not like the attitude of how they did not even try.They just knew that if they ignored us long enough, they would wear us down, which they almost had.The mayor said last night that they have us over a barrel, and he does not like them holding the people over a barrel.He is very disappointed in them. Mayor Insalaco opened the public hearing on the item. Mr. Louis Babin, 2191 S. Belair, Apache Junction, addressed the council.He stated he hears a tone of frustration in Councilmember Serdy's voice.He has spent a lot of time on You Tube and advised Mediacom is not the only game in town.If you get wireless internet, there are many different media sources available. Mr. Conrad Pisinski, 1069 W. 14th Avenue, Apache Junction, addressed the council.He stated he agreed with Councilmember Serdy.They have no idea what is coming on the television that night.They are told to check on the computer, but not everyone has a computer. Mayor Insalaco closed the public hearing on the item with no one else wishing to speak. He reopened the item to council discussion.There being no further discussion, he called for a motion. Councilmember Coleman MOVED THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN TO THE CABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN MEDIACOM AND THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, AND THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT PENDING APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Councilmember Wilson SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:5-1 (Councilmember Serdy voted in opposition.) Councilmember Dietz stated he voted for it reluctantly. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 9 OF 17 Councilmember Barker stated she voted for it with great disappointment and reluctance. Councilmember Wilson echoed the statements of reluctance.He felt they were being forced into it and this is the best they can do at this time. Mayor Insalaco commented he does not like it and feels they are being put over a barrel.He does not like it at all. The motion carried. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS RESOLUTION NO. 10-23, REQUESTING SURROUNDING CITIES AND TOWNS TO SHOW SUPPORT FOR THEIR RESIDENTS BY REJECTING THE PROPOSED UNTIMELY INCORPORATION OF SAN TAN VALLEY )City Manager George Hoffman briefed the council on the item. Councilmember Dietz asked if the figures on the information they were given represents the figures that each city will be losing out of their budget. City Manager George Hoffman stated it would be.The budget includes a significant component of streets revenue.This data is not ours; it was produced by the same people providing the data to the pro -incorporation effort, which is the League of Arizona Cities and Towns.They do their best to neutrally describe the way the state -shared revenue system works and what the impacts would be. Councilmember Dietz commented each one of these cities will be hit each year.He believes Apache Junction taking a $1.6 million hit, or whatever it is. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 10 OF 17 City Manager George Hoffman stated it is approaching $1.6 million. Councilmember Dietz commented that this is without knowing what the state is going to do to us next year. City Manager George Hoffman stated that is correct.This is the League data.Our grants staff have pointed out that there are grant implications.There is a decrease in the formula grants that are out there, such as the Community Development Block Grants and the bullet proof vest program.There will also be more competitors.He does not want them to think that this is the only financial impact, but it is certainly the largest. Councilmember Dietz commented what he was saying is that they do not know what else the city would have to take along with the $1.6 million hit.It is like the other things taken away this year like the LTAF that was used for different things within the city.It has shortened our state -shared revenues.We do not know what the state is going to do to balance their budget on our backs, but whatever they do will be plus this $1.6 million and all the other figures for all the other cities within Pinal County. City Manager George Hoffman stated that is correct, and those were the LTAF I and the LTAF Councilmember Wilson commented we all agree with letting the local people in the area make the determination as to whether they want to incorporate or not.But we represent the citizens of Apache Junction, and we are trying to express their concerns on the potential loss of funds and services those funds would provide.The people in this area will not be affected in any way, shape or form by the council's action tonight as far as the police protection services.They are still covered under the county.We have a potentially major hit which could affect our services that we provide our residents.He wanted to make sure that everyone understands that they are not against them incorporating; we are REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 11 OF 17 just saying not at this time.Let us get back on solid footing before even attempting incorporation. Councilmember Coleman commented he is a believer in local control and local government.He believes that the government closest to the people is the most responsive.He served as president of the League of Cities and Towns.As he looks at this map, it is not infringing on our future planning area.We have no intention of going that far south.The only concern is the loss of revenue to us and the other municipalities.As he looks at the map, when he scrolls down to the bottom, Maricopa does not get a vote.Casa Grande does not get a vote.Coolidge already voted no but they are about 200 feet out of the 6 miles.Eloy does not get a vote.Kearney does not get a vote.Mammoth does not get a vote.The only one that does is Florence. Councilmember Dietz commented that Queen Creek gets a vote. Councilmember Coleman commented Queen Creek does get a vote.He thinks the way that the resolution appears 'on the agenda is exactly right.The proposed untimely incorporation of San Tan Valley, as we look at our own proposed budget, we are looking at spending reserves. This is not a good time for us.He does not believe it is a good time for them to incorporate.It is a down cycle where revenues are scarce.It is not a real_ good time to start creating another level of government.They are asking in this resolution: to ask those that do have a vote .and do have a say in this proposition -to please consider the interests not only,of their communities,:but of ours alSo.It is almost like we are asking them to represent us because we do not get a vote in this.He does not like being placed in .this situation as unfortunately you have to vote yes or no.You cannot not take an action.. You cannot say in 10 years or -anything like that. It is a yes or no proposition.He is asking Florence and Queen Creek and those that do have a say to vote no.That is what this resolution provides us.Itis- an _untimely proposition at this time.If revenues were stable and:the economy was growing, he would probably feel differently.But .at this particular time, when we are already having a tough time paving our streets, to lose $900,,000 of HURF funds would just be critical 'REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 12 OF 17 to us, plus the amount that is in the general fund that would be lost.The latter would mean employees or hours to employees. He does not know where they could find that.He hopes the neighboring communities will pick up the banner and represent us and our feelings in this proposition. Councilmember Barker commented George mentioned regionality and the importance of that.She thinks this resolution does show our concern for our entire region.It is not just Apache Junction that is going to be impacted by this.It is so many cities in Final County. This is a regional problem at this point.She thinks it is very important that we speak for our own citizens as well as the rest of the region and Pinal County in asking for this type of thing. Mayor Insalaco stated a copy of the letter in the guest commentary of the newspaper yesterday by him was sent to all the mayors in Final County.This morning he heard from Mayor Art Sanders of Queen Creek asking what he could do to support us because we are supporting them.This afternoon he got a call at home from the mayor of Florence.He thanked Apache Junction for its support and thanked him for the letter.These are the two communities that have a say.For all the other communities, especially the small ones like Mammoth, which is a _very small community, they cannot afford $81,000 to lose-.He commented George is right in thatwe have a_supervisor that is supposed to take care of Apache Junction.But we were not voted in by San Tan Valley or our.supervisor.We were voted in by the city residents.This is not a yes and not a no, it is just not now.It is definitely the wrong time. Councilmember Dietz agreed. Councilmember Serdy commented he has been anguishing back and forth over this.After last night, he was sure that a yes vote would be the way to go.The more he thinks about it, these people pay this money in..In some ways, it is their money.If you buy lunch and the cashiers _give you too much:money, I feel obligated to give it back.Yes, it would :be, a great hit for us,: but these people pay into it. They are paying :a lot for us right now.As Councilmember Coleman said, the .best government is local government.He knows how they all'felt_when California and Chicago boycotted us over REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15,2010 PAGE 13 OF 17 what we are doing here.They do not know what goes on here.He feels they do not quite have the right to restrict these people. He wished they could have stayed out of it and let it work out. George commented that the supervisor could possibly hold back, he would sure hope that that does not happen.He does not appreciate threats from our representatives.He heard from his constituents that a lot of them wish he would work as hard for Apache Junction as he does for this area.Hopefully, that will start happening.He is still torn over the whole thing.He will have to vote his conscience on it. Councilmember Coleman commented they would want Councilmember Serdy to vote the way he feels.The only response he has is that the people who moved down here moved to an area that they knew was not incorporated. They moved to an urban area that was created by the county, should be paid for by the county in his opinion, but will not happen.He knows that incorporation is an important issue that they will have to tackle one of these days.He is just asking that it not be right now.That is all they are saying.Like the mayor said, not yes, not no, just not now.In fact, they will not get a say to say yes eventually if this map is correct. He is just asking that it be postponed until revenues are more stable.The lot splits, everything was created by the county. Folks moved out there, he thinks, knowing that it was not incorporated.They are not losing anything they are paying in now. Councilmember Barker commented she thinks it is important to point out that the county is not a separate entity.We all pay property tax to the county.That property tax is disbursed to everyone in the county.The services that the county performs are paid for by residents of Pinal County as well as those in the rest of the state.For the folks in San Tan, we are, in fact, helping to pay for what they are doing right now.She thinks it is real important to understand that.We are nbt separate entities; we are just a city within this county.She thinks that by asking them to hold off, it is not jeopardizing them or penalizing them in any way. Mayor Insalaco closed the discussion with no further comments and called for a motion. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 14 OF 17 Councilmember Coleman MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO. 10-23, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, REQUESTING SURROUNDING CITIES AND TOWNS TO SHOW SUPPORT FOR THEIR RESIDENTS BY REJECTING THE PROPOSED UNTIMELY INCORPORATION OF SAN TAN VALLEY, BE APPROVED. Councilmember Dietz SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:5-1 (Councilmember Serdy voted in opposition.) Councilmember Wilson commented he wanted to say again that he is representing our community.He is in no way against them making their decisions in the future.He would like this idea to be put off for several years. The motion carried. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF None. SELECTION OF MEETING DATES, TIMES, LOCATIONS, AND PURPOSES Councilmember Dietz commented the executive session and work session have been canceled for Monday, July 5, due to the Independence Day Holiday.He MOVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5:45 P.M. AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. BE HELD ON TUESDAY, JULY 6, 2010, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, RESPECTIVELY. Councilmember Coleman SECONDED THE MOTION. VOTE:Unanimous. The motion carried. CALL TO THE PUBLIC: None. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 15 OF 17 ADJOURNMENT )Mayor Insalaco adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m. Consent Agenda Items are as follows: 1. Acceptance of Agenda. 2. Acceptance of Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 1, 2010. 3. Consideration of appointment of Pro-Tem Magistrate. 4. Consideration of Employment Agreement for City Magistrate. 5. Consideration of Employment Agreement for City Manager. 6. Consideration of Resolution No. 10-21, amending the City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy for Public Streets in Residential Areas by repealing the existing policy in its entirety, originally adopted under Resolution No. 99-08; and adopting a revised policy. 7. Consideration of Resolution No. 10-22, authorizing the submission of a grant application to the Gila River Indian Community State Shared Revenue Grant Program. 8. Proposed Resolution No. 10-24, authorizing the City of Apache Junction to enter into a development agreement with Superstition Mountain Mental Health Center. ACCEPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2010, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2010. N S. INSALACO Mayor REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 16 OF 17 ATTEST: KATHLEEN CONNELLY City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MINUTES CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, held on the 15th day of June, 2010.I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present. Dated this 29th day of June, 2010. KATHLEEN CONNELLY :<*4,&f4c 1 e 5 -7 G t 4 / 4 City Clerk REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2010 PAGE 17 OF 17