HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-10-16 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 16, 2007
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Apache Junction, Arizona, was held on October 16, 2007, at the
Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice
required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Insalaco called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION
Councilmember Wilson gave the Invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Dietz led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present:Mayor Insalaco
Vice Mayor Eck
Councilmember Barker
Councilmember Dietz
Councilmember Serdy
Councilmember Severs
Councilmember Wilson
Staff Present:
Others Present:
Assistant City Manager Bryant Powell
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
City Attorney Joel Stern
Development Svcs. Director Brad Steinke
Human Resources Director Liz Riley
Assistant to the City Mgr. Matt Busby
Sergeant Jeff Robinson
Grants Specialist Roger Hacker
Planning Manager Fred Baker
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 1 OF 12
ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA
)Councilmember Dietz MOVED
THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED; AND
THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN FOR THE SPONSORSHIP AUDIT AND VALUATION
SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN IEG, LLC AND THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION FOR CONSULTING SERVICES TO CREATE A COMPREHENSIVE AND
LONG-TERM SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $105,000.00 TO BE
TAKEN OUT OF THE CONTINGENCY FUND; AND THAT AUTHORIZATION BE
GIVEN FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT, PENDING FINAL
APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND
THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN EAST VALLEY SENIOR
SERVICES AND THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TO ADD SENIOR PROGRAMS
TO ASSIST HOMEBOUND SENIORS IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,000; AND THAT
AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT
PENDING FINAL APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; AND
ALSO THAT WE MOVE ITEM NO. 6 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO OLD
BUSINESS ITEM NO. 10.
Councilmember Severs SECONDED
THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
None.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
Mr. Noel Benoist, 900 N. San Marcos #35, Apache Junction,
addressed the council regarding his concerns on the plan
preservation ordinance, development fees, and cargo containers.
He also spoke in support of Chief Walp.
Ms. Linda Hilton, 4977 E. Southern Avenue, Apache Junction,
addressed the council to introduce herself as a representative
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 2 OF 12
of the Gold Canyon Artists Group and invited the audience to
studio tours.
Mr. Todd Olear, 2898 S. Arizona Road, Apache Junction, addressed
the council in protest of the plant preservation ordinance,
requested the council to focus on economic sustainability, and
spoke in support of cargo containers and Chief Walp.
Mr. Steven Kennard, 1381 N. Roadrunner, Apache Junction,
declined to speak.
Mr. Ernest Imbeault, 2835 W. Cody, Apache Junction, addressed
the council in support of artists' rights and asked for the city
policies on artwork.
Mr. David Jacokes, 1265 N. Tomahawk Road, Apache Junction,
commander of the Apache Junction Auxiliary Police, addressed the
council in support of Chief Walp.
Mr. James Stephens, 3700 S. Ironwood, Apache Junction, addressed
the council in support of Chief Walp.
Mr. John Kantowski, 835 W. Windsong, addressed the council in
support of Chief Walp.
Mr. Dan Wald, 560 N. Rennick, Apache Junction, addressed the
council regarding the demolition of the Grand Hotel and that
Mickey D's has relocated to the Roadhaven Resort clubhouse.
Ms. Barbara Quick, 1484 W. Apache Trail, Apache Junction,
addressed the council in support of Chief Walp.
Ms. Pam Mosher, no address given, addressed the council in
support of cargo containers.
OLD BUSINESS
RECONSIDERATION OF VOTE ON VICE
MAYOR ECK'S MOTION TO APPROVE
ORDINANCE NO. 1302, CARGO
CONTAINERS, AND CONSIDERATION OF A
MOTION SETTING FUTURE PUBLIC
HEARING DATE ON SAME ORDINANCE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 3 OF 12
)City Attorney Joel Stern
briefed the council on the item.He stated this is on the
agenda because Councilmember Barker requested a motion for
reconsideration.Only a member on the prevailing side of the
original motion may request a reconsideration.She was on the
prevailing side which was a no vote.The focus on this item is
only whether the vice mayor's motion can be considered.They
cannot add any amendments to it.If this motion passes, they
will then make another motion to set a date for a new hearing on
this item.That is the practice under Robert's Rules, state and
city law.
Councilmember Barker stated
there will be two motions, one to reconsider and if that passes
another to set the date.
City Attorney Joel Stern
stated that is correct.There can be discussion on both
motions.
Councilmember Barker
commented she brought this back because following a rather
heated and confusing discussion she felt that the council did
not exactly get what they wanted out of it.She felt it was
important to bring it back and ask the council to reconsider it.
She MOVED THAT WE RECONSIDER VICE MAYOR ECK'S FORMER MOTION ON
CARGO CONTAINERS.
Councilmember Wilson SECONDED
THE MOTION.
VOTE:6-1 (Councilmember Dietz voted in opposition.)
The motion carried.
Councilmember Barker MOVED
THAT THIS BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE COUNCIL AT THE NEXT REGULAR
SESSION ON THE DATE OF NOVEMBER 6, 2007.
Councilmember Wilson SECONDED
THE MOTION.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 4 OF 12
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
commented she wanted to clarify that what is being brought back
is Vice Mayor Eck's proposed motion.
Councilmember Severs asked if
that will be on a work session for discussion and further
direction.
Mayor Insalaco stated it
would not.
City Attorney Joel Stern
stated that is not what the motion said.It said to bring it
back on November 6, 2007, for a public hearing because it is an
ordinance.
VOTE:6-1 (Councilmember Dietz voted in opposition.)
The motion carried.
Councilmember Wilson
commented he received a few telephone calls concerning our
previous discussions on the cargo containers.Some people were
disappointed in his behavior and other members of the council.
The comment was that we should not be discussing these at this
time and that they should just be voting on them.The ongoing
discussion was distractive and went nowhere.He wanted to
state, so that everyone was aware, that because of the open
meeting laws that protect their rights they can only discuss
issues during the time frame of the meetings.They cannot go
behind closed doors and have discussions.They cannot discuss
this between themselves because of the possibility of violating
the open meeting law.They can only be discussed here.It may
seem like we are spending a lot of time arguing one way or
another, but it is protecting their rights as citizens that they
can only discuss it at these times.When they are bringing this
up, they are protecting their rights and representing them.
Councilmember Severs
commented there are several members in our community that may be
in violation right now and are ready to be prosecuted for having
these containers.They had agreed to give them an extension so
that this could be discussed further.He asked if they could do
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 5 OF 12
that again as they continue their discussions and bring this to
an end.
City Attorney Joel Stern
stated it is not on the agenda.That issue should be brought up
on November 6.
Councilmember Severs asked
what about the people between now and November 6.He asked if
they have gone past the 90 days yet.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
stated they have not.They should be fine.
City Attorney Joel Stern
commented Item No. 6 on the Consent Agenda was to be placed
after the cargo container item.He should only need 2 or 3
minutes.
CONSENT AGENDA (continued)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, SOFTWARE
LICENSE AND DEPOT EXCHANGE/DEPOT
REPAIR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH
KRONOS INC. FOR AN INTEGRATED
WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT AND PAYROLL
SYSTEM
)City Attorney Joel Stern
briefed the council on the item.He stated this agreement came
from 2 separate agreements and it has been in progress for the
last 6 to 7 months.There were last minutes changes with Kronos
with their legal council as of 3:00 p.m. this afternoon.He
recommends approval of this but there are business items they
need to weigh.The full amount of compensation is $322,847.05.
The consultant's responsibilities include a go live software
installation deadline because the city wanted to have a drop
dead deadline.In past software agreements, notably the police
department's with the mobile data units, there was none and the
vendors stated they could decide when they want to do it.In
this case they have a date of no later than December 31, 2008.
It should be done a lot quicker than that.If they do not have
it done by then, they will be charged $500 per day in punitive
damages to a maximum of $10,000.On page 8 under Professional
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 6 OF 12
and Educational Services they lay out what is in one of the
exhibits.On page 12, there is a test period to make sure the
actual software works and how much time the city has to make
sure it all works with all of its computer parts.There is a
30 -day risk assessment period.The consultant is given another
30 -day period to fix any problems..The remedy would be the city
gets its money back and that would be the end of the contract.
He has seen a lot of software agreements that do that; it has
been a trend for the last 10 years.This is a perpetual,
personal and nontransferable license.There is a 90 day limited
warranty for defects and materials.The limitation of liability
on page 31 has fairly restrictive language.They agreed to
limit some of the language.If there is a bug in the software
and it costs the city $1,000,000 to fix and the order form is
only up to $322,000, the city would have to eat the rest.The
likelihood of that happening is probably pretty remote.This is
a huge corporation with software that is probably proficient; he
just wanted to make them aware of the risk.They have signed
the agreement and are ready and willing to go.
Mayor Insalaco called for any
discussion.There being no discussion, he called for a motion.
Councilmember Dietz MOVED
THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, SOFTWARE
LICENSE AND DEPOT EXCHANGE/DEPOT REPAIR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KRONOS INC. AND THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION FOR AN
INTEGRATED WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT AND PAYROLL SYSTEM (KNOWN AS
CHRIS) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $322,847.05, AND THAT
AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT
PENDING FINAL APPROVAL AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.
Councilmember Severs SECONDED
THE MOTION.
VOTE:6-1 (Councilmember Serdy voted in opposition.)
The motion carried.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CURRENT EVENTS
Councilmember Severs commented he is amazed at the amount of
time and effort some people will go through to make someone look
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 7 OF 12
bad or hurt them.He spends his time working 80 to 100 hours a
week and then does research for the citizens in order to do the
best representation he can for the community.He then spends
some time with his family.Someone has taken the time to dig up
dirt on him, make copies of it, pass it out to several people in
the community and call the newspapers.It was an effort to harm
him and make him look bad.In doing so, he has received a copy
of what was being passed out.He discovered that his
contractor's license was in temporary suspension because of his
bond had expired.He thanked the malicious person.Because of
their efforts, he has contacted the Registrar of Contractors
Office and started the process to correct his oversight.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Assistant City Manager Bryant Powell stated this week is the
Apache Junction Unified School District fall break and the city
manager is with his daughter on vacation.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
RESOLUTION NO. 07-36, DECLARING
CHAPTER 1 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE, ARTICLE 25 PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW A PUBLIC
RECORD, ORDINANCE NO. 1307,
AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
BY ADDING CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 25
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
REVIEW AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE )
)Planning Manager Fred
Baker briefed the council on the item.He stated the council
adopted design guidelines by resolution and directed staff to
strengthen those to implement better design guidelines.The
ordinance requires a preliminary development plan for all
entitlement submittal requirements, requires developers to
provide more detail, allowing the city to review preliminary
architecture and landscaping.The ordinance applies to all
entitlement cases and, most importantly, all rezoning cases.
Council has directed staff to amend the ordinance so that when a
rezoning is submitted, the actual preliminary design and
landscaping of the project can be seen.They would then know
what kind of project they are approving.The ordinance will
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 8 OF 12
apply to conditional use permits, rezonings, planned
developments, planned development amendments and preliminary
plats.Staff will create an approval process for a preliminary
development plan.The plan must be approved before a building
permit is applied for.All projects will now have to apply for
a preliminary site plan review meeting.They have had great
success over time since they created this review process to
encourage developers and others seeking entitlements on
properties to come through the process.It is reviewed by the
water district, sewer district, fire district, engineers and
planners and any other public agency that may have input.They
now want to require this as part of the submittal.The
submittal will then be reviewed by either staff, planning and
zoning or the city council.If the zoning is in place, an
administrative review by staff of preliminary architecture and
landscaping will take place.For all other projects except
conditional use permits, the city council will look at the
proposed rezoning, planned development or preliminary plat,
architecture and landscaping and have the chance to approve it.
They are also trying to standardize the submittal requirements
so that they are to scale and will address exterior lighting,
plus landscaping plans that will address size, location and type
of plant.One public comment was received on this regarding
modifying the appeal procedure.The current procedure is if any
party disagrees with any decision of the development services
director, or any person acting in the capacity of zoning
administrator, concerning issues relating to the preliminary
development plan process, the matter may be appealed to the
Board of Adjustment.The comment requests we add that the Board
of Adjustment hearing be held within 60 days of filing the
appeal.Staff is concurring with that suggestion.
Councilmember Severs asked
what would happen if they could not meet within 60 days.
Planning Manager Fred Baker
stated they would have a hearing.They have an advertising
period and they have to call for a hearing and try to get a
quorum.The key is to get a date.They have regularly
scheduled monthly hearing dates.If they have a concern about
getting it within that 60 day period, they can call for a
special meeting as long as it is legally advertised.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 9 OF 12
Mayor Insalaco opened the
public hearing on the item.There being no one wishing to
speak, he closed the public hearing and reopened the item to
council discussion.There being no further discussion, he
called for a motion.
Councilmember Dietz MOVED
THAT RESOLUTION NO. 07-36, A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A
PUBLIC RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK
ENTITLED "APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE, VOLUME II LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE,CHAPTER 1 ZONING ORDINANCE,ARTICLE 25 PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW,BE APPROVED.
Vice Mayor Eck SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
Councilmember Barker MOVED
THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1307 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF
THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED.
Councilmember Dietz SECONDED
THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
read the ordinance by title only.
Councilmember Barker MOVED
THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1307, AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK, BE APPROVED
AND ADOPTED.
Councilmember Dietz SECONDED
THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 10 OF 12
The motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF
None.
SELECTION OF MEETING DATES, TIMES, LOCATIONS, AND PURPOSES
Councilmember Dietz MOVED
THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M. AND A WORK SESSION AT
7:00 P.M. BE HELD ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2007, IN THE CITY
COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, RESPECTIVELY;
AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M. BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 6, 2007, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM.
THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Severs SECONDED
)Mayor Insalaco adjourned
the meeting at 7:54 p.m.
Consent Agenda Items are as follows:
1. Acceptance of Agenda.
2. Acceptance of Minutes of Special Meeting of September 27,
2007.
3. Acceptance of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October
2, 2007.
4. Approval of Sponsorship Audit and Valuation Services
Agreement with IEG, L.L.C.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 11 OF 12
5. Approval of Second Amendment to Agreement with East Valley
Senior Services to add Senior Programs.
6. Approval of Professional Services, Software License and Depot
Exchange/Depot Repair Maintenance Agreement with Kronos Inc.
for an Integrated Management and Payroll System (CHRIS), in
an Amount not to Exceed $315,700.
ACCEPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2007, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2007.
N S. INSALACO
yor
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and
correct copy of the minutes of the regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, held on the
16th day of October, 2007.I further certify that the meeting
was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 30th day of October, 2007.
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 16, 2007
PAGE 12 OF 12