HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-10-15 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 15,2002
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona,was held on October 15,2002,at the Apache Junction City Council
Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Coleman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION
Councilmember Milkey gave the Invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice Mayor Surra led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present:Mayor Coleman
Vice Mayor Surra
Councilmember Dietz
Councilmember Durbala
Councilmember Eck
Councilmember Milkey
Councilmember Urich
Staff Present:Interim City Manager George Hoffman
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
City Attorney Joel Stern
Public Safety Director Robert Warner
Interim Development Svcs.Dir.Rudy Esquivias
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant Powell
Others Present:Multi -Media Producer Matt McNulty
CDBG Administrative Assistant Melinda Larson
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 1 OF 18
Assistant Planner Juli McDaid
Grants Specialist Roger Hacker
ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA
)Vice Mayor Surra MOVED THAT THE
CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED.
Councilmember Durbala SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
AWARDS,PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Durbala and Councilmember Urich attended the Rural Development
Conference this year and Councilmember Durbala gave a briefing to the council
on the seminars they attended.
Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith presented the mayor with an award
received by the city for the recycling program.The city had nominated the
county for the award.
Councilmember Durbala commented he had learned that the recycling program had
already given them an additional six months of use for the landfill.
Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith stated they will be having a hazardous
waste and tire collection on October 19,2002.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
Ms.Rosalie Gifford,1485 W.14th Avenue,Apache Junction,addressed the
council regarding illegible and missing street signs and requested the city
update the street signs.
Vice Mayor Surra requested staff follow through on seeing what it would take
to do that.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 2 OF 18
Interim City Manager George Hoffman commented Jeff Bell has put together a
report on what the city is doing to conserve water.It will be brought to
council at a work session.Pat Brenner,Doug Dobson,Ron Grittman and others
have worked on an aggressive notification process for the Baseline and
Ironwood intersection traffic signal.They have advised the neighborhood,
golf course,local businesses and the Town of Queen Creek.The rumble strips
are going down today and the electric sign is already out.The chip seal
program has been completed.The household hazardous waste and white goods
pick up will be this Saturday.Ironwood will be paved this week.Public
Works was out this past Saturday restriping the high school parking lot.
Additional internal signage will be added.The short term work has been
completed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM PERMIT,NEW
LICENSE,LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
SERIES 10 LIQUOR LICENSE FOR JR FOOD MART )
)This request was withdrawn at the
request of the applicant.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
PZ-4-02,PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.1168,
CITY -INITIATED REZONING REQUEST ON W.
APACHE TRAIL
)Assistant Planner Juli McDaid
briefed the council on the item.It will change the zoning of 32 parcels in
Section 19 located between Meridian and Delaware on the north side of Apache
Trail and between Meridian and the Warner Drive alignment on the south side to
4th Avenue.I t is part of the Meridian Redevelopment Area.Council was
concerned some of the existing uses would not be appropriate for the area,
instead requesting retail,professional,office and other compatible uses
along Apache Trail.The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended
approval with a vote of 4-1 for most of the proposed area,though they
recommended excluding 13 parcels along the north side of 4th Avenue and south
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 3 OF 18
of the Safeway property because of opposition from several property owners in
the area.Their recommendation was to withdraw stipulation 12.They also
recommended expanding the palette of uses to include fueling stations and
churches.She briefed the council on the surrounding area.The existing
zoning of the properties varies along the north side of Apache Trail with the
majority being CB -2 and CI -1,general commercial and light industrial zoning.
The south side is all CI -1.The 1999 General Plan designates the entire area
as employment/retail with a trails/landscaping area shown along the right-of-
way.The actual development between Meridian and Delaware is almost entirely
retail with the exception of a church and one residence.The 4th Avenue area
is designated as medium density residential but the parcels on the north side
of the street consist of light industrial uses and an older mobile home park.
Flood elevation certification would be required for developers in this area
prior to obtaining building permits.There would be no non -conformity created
with the rezoning of the developed properties with the exception of the one
residence on Delaware.Staff believes a planned development overlay for the
properties in this area would enhance the value.Council's directives could
be accomplished by a series of stipulations such as those contained in the
staff report,applying to new development and redevelopment.They would
insure construction of the highest quality,design consistency with a specific
theme,and landscaping of a greater density.She listed the stipulations in
the report.The buildings would be designed to complement each other and
establish common architectural relationships.She listed the suggested
building styles and color palette.The building maximum height will be 35'.
Signage and lighting should complement the building.Staff has created a list
of uses appropriate for the area,including those conducive to creating a
downtown atmosphere where people could gather and feel comfortable.It was
staff's opinion that certain businesses appear to encourage large groups,such
as spectator and participant sports,civic centers,museums,banks and
government branch offices.They may not generate large amounts of sales tax,
they are included because they would boost retail sales and services in the
area.She commented the basis for staff's report and recommendations hinge on
five factors:to establish a palette of retail professional office and other
compatible uses for Apache Trail for development and redevelopment;to create
a sense of community within the neighborhood;to increase and improve the
range,variety and quality of economic businesses available;to insure the
property owners are provided with a hospitable and secure environment;and to
create a unique character and provide for continuity within the area.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 4 OF 18
Councilmember Urich asked what the
concerns were from the 13 parcels located on the north side of 4th Avenue.
Assistant Planner Juli McDaid stated
they expressed concerns about the city's intention with regard to redeveloping
the area.They are also concerned about being able to expand,change the use
or add to the use.They are afraid they would lose that right if this were
rezoned.They were told if the business remained as is and where is,it would
not be affected.Those with vacant properties were concerned.
Councilmember Urich stated she
wondered where their concerns were because they were notified there would be
no changes if they were on the property.
Vice Mayor Surra commented there are
some uses permitted because the classification is industrial.An earlier
ordinance had allowed sexually oriented businesses in industrial areas because
the council wanted them away from residential areas and nice commercial areas.
She added if they did not make this change,a sexually oriented business would
be allowable in this area.She would like to see them move forward with this.
Assistant Planner Juli McDaid stated
there is language included in the public hearing information where council
could add those uses back in.
on the presentation.
Jan Kronenburg was very helpful.
the land along 4th Avenue is vacant.
Councilmember Eck complimented her
Assistant Planner Juli McDaid stated
Councilmember Eck asked how much of
Assistant Planner Juli McDaid showed
the vacant properties on the map.Six of the 13 properties are still vacant.
Vice Mayor Surra asked if the
landowners would lose value if their industrial properties were rezoned to
commercial properties.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 5 OF 18
Assistant Planner Juli McDaid stated
a certified appraiser should answer that question.However,anything they do
to a property that provides for increased standards should enhance the value
of the property.There are greater protections afforded to those people
developing in that area.Each property has to be developed to the same
standards.
Councilmember Eck commented he was
thinking more of the properties adjacent Apache Trail when they discussed this
rather than those so far down.He agrees with the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation.
Vice Mayor Surra commented she is
concerned about not including the whole Meridian Development Area.She
thought they eventually wanted to do that so that it would bring the same
standards to that area.
the vice mayor.
Councilmember Durbala agreed with
Mayor Coleman closed the discussion
and moved on to the next item.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF ON ANY OF THE ABOVE LISTED AGENDA ITEMS
None.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF ON OTHER PROPOSED LEGISLATION OR ACTIONS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
LOCAL CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PLAN
)Grants Specialist Roger Hacker
briefed the council on the item.He commented staff's proposal meets the
Department of Commerce's regulations for citizen input and i t also addresses
the council's concerns about some of the issues that came up during the last
cycle.The Health and Human Services Commission had an introductory meeting
last week and they are eager to get going.He requested council direction on
the plan outlined in the staff report.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 6 OF 18
Councilmember Eck asked if the city
projects would be in there with all the others.
Grants Specialist Roger Hacker
stated that is correct.They will be requesting projects from department
heads for concerns that could be addressed by CDBG.They believe staff has
valuable ideas along with the citizens.
Councilmember Eck commented he was
concerned last time because almost all the money went towards social services
and neglected other issues that needed attention,such as street improvements.
Grants Specialist Roger Hacker
commented he believed council was put in the bad situation last time of having
the people come to the meeting asking for their specific projects.He
believes it made i t hard for the council to step back and weigh all the
options.He believes this process will allow the council to see what their
priorities are and what projects they would like to see funded.They will
have more opportunity to respond to the projects.
Councilmember Eck stated he hoped
they would be getting some formal direction.He had mentioned using the
Health and Human Services Commission for this process because there was a lot
of campaigning and they had to make a decision that night.
Grants Specialist Roger Hacker
commented they had been put into a bad situation inadvertently by staff.
Mayor Coleman closed the item with
no further discussion and called for a motion.
Vice Mayor Surra MOVED THAT STAFF BE
GIVEN THE FOLLOWING DIRECTION REGARDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDBG)LOCAL CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PLAN:THAT THEY GO FORWARD WITH THE
IMPLEMENTING OF THE PLAN AS OUTLINED IN THE MEMORANDUM THAT WAS ON TODAY'S
AGENDA.
Councilmember Dietz SECONDED THE
MOTION.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 7 OF 18
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
UPDATE BY SUPERVISOR SANDIE SMITH ON PINAL
COUNTY SOLID WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAM AND
TRANSFER STATION:DIRECTION TO STAFF
REGARDING RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE
COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL METHODS
)Pinal County Supervisor Sandie
Smith briefed the council on the item.There was a move to expand the
landfill in Florence but i t has not been met with a favorable response.
Florence and Coolidge are proposing a transfer station instead.Their
comprehensive plan has been changed to 17 miles to the south of Florence where
they have 800 acres surrounded by state land where there is a proposal to put
in a regional landfill.The general plan has been amended to allow for this
proposal.The same person is putting in a transfer station south of General
Motors near Meridian.I t is now under design,having passed through the city
council.They are concerned because right now all of the regional landfills
are on Maricopa Road,which is a long hauling distance.They need to look at
partnerships between the cities and towns in Pinal County in order to give
affordable solid waste disposal to the residents.It costs more with transfer
stations because there is one more step to do.I t is an issue that keeps
coming back and no one wants a landfill near them,but i t still needs to be
done to provide for affordable solid waste disposal.They also need to
prevent desert dumping,which will increase if the price goes up.I t is not
always community residents;the area is a convenient dumping ground for
Maricopa and Pima counties.
Councilmember Eck commended her for
her efforts on trying to get a regional landfill.He commented on the
residents fighting a landfill in Buckeye out in the middle of fields where
nothing could be seen for miles.
Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith
stated i t is like a power plant.Everyone wants the electricity but no one
wants the power plant or lines near them.No one wants solid waste next to
them;they want to put the garbage out on the sidewalk in a can and have i t
disappear.They do not have to think about it,but the elected have to think
about it.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 8 OF 18
Councilmember Durbala asked if the
transfer station would be 26 miles from the city.
Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith
stated it would be more like 17 miles,but you have to go in about 5 to 7
miles so it may be close to 26 miles.
Councilmember Durbala stated i t
would be cheaper than going over to Butterfield.
Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith
stated i t is.Phoenix once talked about coming out this way,but that was
stopped.They are now talking about going to Butterfield,but the people in
Mobile are protesting all the landfills coming out their way.The cities also
have to think about the routes and the regional transportation issues
involving those trucks going down the roads.They are now talking with the
east valley cities to determine how the state land should be developed between
Apache Junction and the San Tans and about a road coming from Williams Gateway
to the alternate route being created for the freeway extension.
Councilmember Durbala asked if that
was the 202 she was talking about.
Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith
stated the 202 will have an interchange at Williams,and that will be the
westernmost hub of a road that would connect to US 60.The easternmost hub
would be just this side of the Renaissance Festival.The alternate road,
which should have been built long ago,will have an interchange at Silly
Mountain and another before the Renaissance Festival.That would relieve a
lot of the traffic and accommodate all the uses.
Vice Mayor Surra commented a
regional landfill was one of the topics on her interview for council nine
years ago.I t is an ever present question with no one being able to find a
solution.The garbage grows with the population.
Pinal County Supervisor Sandie Smith
commended them for seeing there was a problem and they filled in for the short
term with the expectation of looking towards the long term.She used to think
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 9 OF 18
long term planning was 5 to 7 years;she now believes i t is 15 to 40 years.
They need to plan now to prevent extra expense.
Vice Mayor Surra commented i t
definitely needs to be a partnership.
Mayor Coleman closed the
presentation and opened the direction to staff on residential solid waste
collection and disposal methods.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell briefed the council on the item.Three weeks ago staff provided an
analysis of the current city solid waste disposal and collection services.
Three different disposal and collection methods were discussed:the citizens
contracting out:the city going into the business itself:or an exclusive
license agreement with a specific disposal and collection business.He is
seeking direction from the council on the issue.
Vice Mayor Surra commented the city
does not have the resources to have its own sanitation department.Most of
the cities who fund sanitation services are taking the money out of a property
tax that they collect.It would be hard to do out of retail sales tax
collection.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell agreed.Most cities consider i t a headache:most California cities are
moving towards privatizing the collection.
Vice Mayor Surra stated i t is an
option the city should not even look at,narrowing the list to two.She would
like information on what costs would be involved,though she favors getting
some businesses that are in that business telling the city what they can do
for the city and at what cost.
Councilmember Eck commented he knows
Councilmember Durbala has tried to do this with good intentions,but he
believes the trash collection business should be left as is.He does not
think they fully realize what they would be getting involved with if they went
on a contract,especially from staff and control levels.He does not see this
as a major problem at this time.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 10 OF 18
Councilmember Dietz stated he would
be interested in looking at everything,seeing what is proposed and what is
involved.He does not know if he would be in favor of it,but he feels they
need to look at every aspect.
Councilmember Urich commented she is
aware the citizens are concerned about the issue and she would like more
information to help her decide how she should vote.
Councilmember Milkey asked if the
citizens would have the opportunity to opt out of this:to contract
independently or haul their own trash out.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated that would be up to the council to set the policy.Other cities
do not mandate it,but i t is associated with water bills and sewer bills.I f
they do not pay for the disposal service,they turn off their water or
utilities.Most city administrators would prefer demanding it.
Councilmember Eck commented that was
one of his concerns.Previous discussions stated it would be mandated and i t
would be the city's responsibility to make sure it was paid for.The city is
not in the utility business and does not have the control to do that.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated the request for qualifications could determine if the service
providers could manage the financial system,how they would do i t and how much
it would cost.
Vice Mayor Surra asked if this would
be different from having contractors of these services bid for permitting only
one company to have the ability to go out there than having the city sponsor
the collection and hiring someone to do that job.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated that is his understanding,but he is not sure how an exclusive
license agreement works.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 11 OF 18
Councilmember Durbala commented they
have an exclusive agreement with the cable system now.I t should be similar
to that agreement.
City Attorney Joel Stern stated the
cable agreement is a license that is granted to MediaCom.I t is not
exclusive.Any other company could come in as long as they provide equal
service.The same could be done for trash companies;i t could be a non-
exclusive license.It could be done any way the council wishes.They could
have different areas for different companies.They could also have
exclusivity with basically a contract with that company.
Councilmember Milkey stated he
worries about exclusivity.It would restrict free enterprise;competition
always results in lower prices.The cable agreement does not mandate paying
for cable;one can have cable,get a dish or get rabbit ears.He worries
about mandating and making it exclusive that every Apache Junction resident
have trash service.
Mayor Coleman stated that is his
concern also.He would rather see it more community -driven.He knows the
trucks on the street are problem,but he is not sure it will be better if this
is done,especially for the rate payers.If they do not pay their cable bill,
they do not get cable.
Vice Mayor Surra commented she
believed people would pay their bill if it is low enough.It would be up to
the council to make sure that the price can be controlled.There are 3
companies going up and down her street and all 3 have a different price.She
has not changed hers and she is paying more than the other two companies
charge.She believes she could be paying a third less than what she is
currently paying if she wanted to make the effort to change.She does not
want to have to go through the hassle of going through company after company
to find the lowest rate every six months.She would like to know if the city
would have the option of locking in the rate.She wants the information in
order to see what kind of control the city would be given and if they can get
the rock bottom price for everyone.
Mayor Coleman commented he is
concerned about how long would i t last and what kind of service they would get
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 12 OF 18
for the rock bottom price.Currently if he is missed,he can call and they
come and get it or he contracts with another company.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated that is the way i t is now and typically the contracts are for 5
to 7 years.They are written in a way to include the Consumer Price Index at
2% or 3%.They would go up.With a contract,the city would be able to
control that.
Councilmember Urich stated the
citizens control i t now.
Councilmember Durbala commented the
residents have a right not to have trash pick up.They can throw it in their
neighbors'dumpsters or even Wal-Mart's.No one knows how much there is,i f
it goes to the dump,or if it gets put in other people's dumpsters.He has
two neighbors who do that on his street.I t happens more than you think.He
commented the city had just received an award for recycling with the county.
He believes everyone will be required to recycle in a few more years,and i f
i t is included in the bid on this and already in the contract,it will be
cheaper than when every company has to provide it.He wondered if they would
be able to use the landfill longer if the recycling was included in the
contract at this early date.I t costs money to truck it to another location
and that will be added to the bill.He asked them to look at real dollar
savings.Right now everything thrown out goes to the landfill unless i t is
physically taken to one of the drop off centers.The recycling would be
available in the contract.They should be looking at saving the space in the
landfill so that i t lasts another 3 to 4 years after the 8 to 10 years
currently projected.He commented there are 5 companies that want to make a
competitive bid on the exclusive contract.We need to find out i f i t is
cheaper for the residents.If it is more expensive,he will give the city a
public apology for being wrong.He believes it will be cheaper in the long
run.The contracts are only 5 to 10 years and they are usually renewable.
They can make them buy decent trucks to prevent leaking trucks and they can do
certain parts of the city on certain days,and they can put in what happens i f
the trash in not picked up.Most cities have i t in their contracts that the
rates can only be raised 2% or 3% above the Consumer Price Index.
Vice Mayor Surra asked if the rate
increases could be yearly.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 13 OF 18
Councilmember Durbala commented i f
the Index was 4%and they were allowed 2%,it would be a 6%increase.He does
not know if it would keep going higher and higher because they do not have all
the information here.He wants to get the information,look at i t and then
discuss it.He would like it open to the public so they do not think we are
hiding anything.Everyone thinks i t is one company the city is already
looking at instead of putting it out to bid.The residents do not understand
because the papers have not advised them it is a bid process.All of the bids
should be released for the public to see.He would like them to get the
information and look at this.He would like to see if it saves the community
money and saves the city on transportation as far as the streets.The way the
trucks are driven they damage the streets.
Mayor Coleman commented he is aware
there will be competition for the bid,but he is concerned about the
competition after the bid and the service that is provided after the bid is
awarded.He asked why other communities are privatizing.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated i t is something that can be privatized.Chandler is doing i t
because they do not want to do it themselves.They have control,i t is
mandated,they have clean up issues,uniformity,a sense of community,and
trash trucks and trash containers that are uniform.They also get a
competitive rate;i t is the lowest in the valley.
Councilmember Dietz asked if they
have only one company.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated they do.
Councilmember Dietz asked if all the
cities going to privatization are contracting to one company only.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
have only one company.
Powell stated they do.
Powell stated that is correct.
Councilmember Dietz commented that
allows them to distance themselves.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 14 OF 18
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated that is correct.They are getting out of the waste business.
Vice Mayor Surra commented
Councilmember Dietz has clarified what privatization is -dealing only with
one company instead of letting six companies come in and deal with the
individual homeowners.I t is privatization when one company gets the entire
contract.The city gets control with this method,allowing for code
compliance control,recycling control and the exertion of some influence on
the pricing due to the volume involved.
Assistant to the City Manager Bryant
Powell stated i t is a term called economy to scale.
Mayor Coleman closed the discussion
and called for a motion.
Councilmember Durbala MOVED THAT
STAFF BE GIVEN THE FOLLOWING DIRECTION REGARDING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND
DISPOSAL:AN "RFQ",WHICH IS A REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS,AND WHEN STAFF
GETS THAT DONE BRING IT BACK TO THE COUNCIL.I'D LIKE TO SEE WHAT THEY COME
UP WITH,I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COSTS FOR RECYCLING,CPUI INDEX ON THERE,
PERCENTAGE OF WHAT THAT'S GOING TO BE,TERM OF THE LEASE,HOW MANY VEHICLES
THERE WILL BE,AND THE COST OVER A PERIOD OF INITIALLY DOING IT FOR THE
LICENSE.
Interim City Manager George Hoffman
asked if staff could offer other appropriate questions.
Councilmember Durbala added AND HAVE
STAFF OFFER ANY QUESTIONS THAT IT SEES FIT AND THEN,BEFORE THEY DO THAT,
PLEASE SUBMIT IT TO THE COUNCIL,NOT ACTUALLY,YOU CAN SEND IT TO US IN A
LETTER AND GIVE US AT LEAST FIVE DAYS TO ADD ANY OTHER COMMENTS THAT THE
COUNCIL WISHES TO ADD TO THAT LETTER,OR TO THE PROPOSAL,THE RFQ.
Interim City Manager George Hoffman
stated they would probably be bringing that back to council in session.
Vice Mayor Surra SECONDED THE
MOTION.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 15 OF 18
VOTE:3-4 (Mayor Coleman,Councilmember Urich,Councilmember Eck and
Councilmember Milkey voted in opposition.)
Councilmember Urich requested her
comments be part of the record."BASED ON WHAT CITIZENS HAVE TOLD ME AND WHAT
I HEARD TONIGHT,I VOTE NO."
The motion failed.
SELECTION OF MEETING DATES,TIMES,LOCATIONS,AND PURPOSES
Councilmember Dietz MOVED THAT AN
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M.AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M.BE HELD ON
MONDAY,NOVEMBER 4,2002,IN THE CITY CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS,RESPECTIVELY,AND
THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M.BE HELD ON TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 5,2002,
IN THE CITY CONFERENCE ROOM.
Vice Mayor Surra SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
INFORMATION AND REPORTS
Councilmember Milkey attended the City of Mesa Economic Development Annual
Breakfast this morning.He obtained some information that might help the City
of Apache Junction.The message was to listen to your constituents and
fulfill their needs,allowing the community to grow into what they want.
Councilmember Eck attended a meeting at Salt River Project concerning the
drought.He is glad to see that the city is striving to set the standard for
conserving water.The past four years have been the worst four years for
precipitation in the last century.They are holding back a third of their
surface water to the valley communities.We will be in serious trouble for
water in the next few years.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 16 OF 18
Vice Mayor Surra reminded everyone that the Arizona Department of
Transportation Board is having a meeting in our council chambers on Friday
morning.I t is not a public session,but they may have a Call to the Public
section.You may learn something about them here.The meeting starts at 9:00
a.m.She suggested those who want to learn what ADOT will do for the city
should attend.
ADJOURNMENT
)Mayor Coleman adjourned the
meeting at 8:16 p.m.
Consent Agenda Items are as follows:
1.Acceptance of Agenda.
2.Acceptance of Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 1,2002.
ACCEPTED THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER ,2002,BY THE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER ,2002.
—_TE)k •
DOUGLAS CO MAN
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 17 OF 18
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the
minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache
Junction,Arizona,held on the 15th day of October,2002.I further certify
that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 23rd day of October,2002.
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 15,2002
PAGE 18 OF 18