HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-04-06 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 6,1993
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona,was held on April 6,1993 at the Apache Junction City Council
Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Damiano called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION
Vice Mayor Eidson gave the Invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilman Coleman led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen Present:Mayor Damiano
Vice Mayor Eidson
Councilwoman Barker
Councilwoman Alger
Councilman Coleman
Councilman Cox
Staff Present:
Others Present:
(Councilman Perkins was absent.)
City Manager Michael R.Lee
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut
Assistant City Manager George Hoffman
Director of Public Works Rich Broman
City Engineer Gordon Grandy
Planning Division Manager Jim Nakagawa
William McDaniel,11124 E.Sugar Creek Dr.,
Apache Junction
Judy Hamilton,18016 S.Cooper Rd.,Chandler
Barry J.Baldwin,2551 W.Apache Trail,Apache
Junction
Bob Gray,6413 E.Vernon Ave.,Scottsdale
Betty Carothers,4116 E.Broadway,Apache
Junction
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 1 OF 21
Reg Warren,575 N.Idaho Rd.,County Complex
(vendor's place of business)
Frank Kennemur,2945 E.Tepee,Apache Junction
ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA
)Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT
THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED;AND
THAT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT'S OPERATING AND PROCEDURES MANUAL,AS
RECOMMENDED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMISSION,BE APPROVED;AND
THAT THE LICENSE AGREEMENT TO SUPERSTITION MOUNTAIN MENTAL HEALTH CENTER,TO
OPERATE THE CENTER FOR THE HANDICAPPED,BE APPROVED;AND
THAT RESOLUTION NO.93-08,ADOPTING A FAIR HOUSING POLICY,MAKING KNOWN ITS
COMMITMENT TO THE PRINCIPLE OF FAIR HOUSING AND DESCRIBING ACTIONS IT SHALL
UNDERTAKE TO AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHER FAIR HOUSING,BE APPROVED.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
AWARDS,PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Damiano presented proclamations for "Community Development Block
Grant Week"and "Fair Housing Month"to John Flumerfelt,Housing and Grants
Coordinator.
Week."
Mayor Damiano presented a proclamation to Elks Lodge No.2349 for "Youth
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
None.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Mike Lee briefed the Council on the financial report.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
APPLICATION FOR A NEW LIQUOR LICENSE,
SERIES 10,SUBMITTED FOR FLASH STOP
MARKET
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 2 OF 21
)City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
briefed the Council on this item stating this is a standard request for a new
license for the Flash Stop Convenience Store.
Mayor Damiano opened the public
hearing;there being no one wishing to speak,he closed the public hearing.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT THE
APPLICATION FOR ANEW LIQUOR LICENSE,SERIES 10,SUBMITTED FOR FLASH STOP
MARKET,BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR
LICENSES AND CONTROL.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO.858,CITY -INITIATED AMENDMENT
TO THE SIGN CODE (PZ-4-92)
Nakagawa briefed the Council on this item.
hearing.
Planning Division Manager Jim
Mayor Damiano opened the public
Reg Warren,575 N.Idaho Rd.,County
Complex (vendor's place of business),addressed the Council regarding the
problems with having "A"frame signs and his concern that these signs be
enforced fairly.
Vice Mayor Eidson asked if the sign
code would allow "A"frame signs.
Assistant Planner Rudy Esquivias
stated that temporary signs would be allowed for general,city-wide public
benefit events.
Commissioner Gil Verley commented on
possible liability and on safety of "A"frame signs.
Mr.Lee suggested that the Council
adopt this ordinance tonight and look at the "A"frame signs later.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly pointed
out this is an 11 -page ordinance and it would cost quite a bit of money to
publish it.She recommended that if the Council has any uncertainty about the
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 3 OF 21
adoption of this ordinance,that it be done all at once and that it contain
all of the correct amendments.
Vice Mayor Eidson asked Mr.Lee if
the Council could pass this and then look at the other changes later.
Mr.Lee answered yes,if those were
additional changes to the sign code.
Vice Mayor Eidson replied that he
did not mean changes to the sign code but to the building code.
Mr.Lee commented that the building
code does not take care of the problem that has been brought up.He stated
this ordinance does not allow "A"frame signs and the Council wants to find a
way to allow them and keep them safe --one idea was to attach them to the
ground but then i t is no longer a portable sign but a permanent sign.
Vice Mayor Eidson replied that what
he meant on his comment was to weigh down the sign on the ground and not to
attach it.
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut suggested
to continue this item but if it has to go again through the Planning and
Zoning Commission,it may not be back at the next council meeting.
Mr.Lee suggested allowing the
Chamber of Commerce to make some comments on this issue.
Mayor Damiano invited some of the
committee members who were present to speak on this item.
Sandra Smith,3575 N.Prospector,
stated that she believed that the Council could go forward with this and amend
it later.She commented that the procedure to anchor an "A"frame sign should
be in the procedures and not in the ordinance.
Mr.Gimbut replied that there is
more to the sign than just the anchoring such as how big,where i t is supposed
to be,how many,etc.
Mrs.Smith asked if those
specifications had to be in this document.
Mr.Gimbut answered yes.
Mrs.Smith suggested to pass the
ordinance with the amendment.She added that the "A"frame sign issue has
been in every single review of the committee and the legality was the only
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 4 OF 21
question they ever had about it.She stated
that you cannot enforce,then you should not
Mr.
has the power to pass this ordinance with an
what should the amendment be.
that if you have an ordinance
have it.
Gimbut stated that the Council
amendment but the question is
Mrs.Smith stated that the committee
has never had a problem with "A"frame signs other than the numbers that it
could entail and if the Council does not allow the signs,then they would have
to address the inability to enforce that because there are a lot of "A"frame
signs in the city.If the Council is going to allow them,then take it out of
the ordinance and allow the businesses to have them,because you only weaken
and ordinance if you can't enforce it.
Mr.Gil Verley suggested to include
in the ordinance,under the exemptions clause,that "any business in the
commercial district is allowed one six -square -foot 'A'frame sign weighted in
such a fashion as to not be a public nuisance,located on their own property."
He added that this statement would allow the commercial enterprise to have one
sign and the only exception would be on property controlled by the City,and
that way Mr.Warren would be allowed to have it where he was at.
Councilwoman Alger stated that the
part that's going to be a problem is where it says "weighted so it is not to
be a nuisance"because there is no enforcement ability there.
Mr.Gimbut asked Mr.Verley if he
had a recommendation on the amount of weight.
Mr.Verley answered he would say 10
pounds and not less than that.
Councilman Coleman asked if there
was an estimate on how many "A"frame signs there will be in town.
Mr.Verley answered that probably
every other business on Apache Trail and every business that is always looking
to have a sign.
Councilman Coleman was concerned
that if the Council does allow the "An frame signs then every body is going to
have unequal size on signs.
Councilman Coleman MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.858 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE
ORDINANCE BE WAIVED.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 5 OF 21
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
City Clerk Kathy Connelly read,"AN
ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA,AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,ZONING ORDINANCE,BY AMENDING
ARTICLE 21 SIGN CODE IN CASE PZ-4-92;REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;
AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY."
Councilman Coleman MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.858,AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
Vice Mayor Eidson asked if the
Council amends the motion with Mr.Verley's recommendation,can the Council
look at i t a year from now if there is a problem and reverse this action.
Councilman Coleman commented that a
year from now the businesses will have some money invested in those signs and
then we are going to tell them that there are too many signs and they are not
going to have them.
Mr.Gimbut stated there is going to
be a problem with grandfather rights.He explained that there is an open
debate in the law of whether this applies to temporary portable uses but it's
a debate that can go either way.
Vice Mayor Eidson stated he did not
feel there would be a problem with the amendment.He AMENDED THAT ANY
BUSINESS IN A COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT MAY HAVE AN "A"FRAME SIGN,A MAXIMUM
OF SIX SQUARE FEET IN SIZE,WEIGHTED WITH NOT LESS THAN TEN -POUNDS,AND PLACED
ADJACENT TO THEIR BUSINESS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY."
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
Councilwoman Alger was concerned
that if this amendment passed,trailer parks could not use "A"frame signs
because they are not known as commercial but as residential,but because they
rent spaces they are like a business.She asked if that is something the
Council needed to address.
Vice Mayor Eidson replied that there
are many trailer parks that have the signs now.
Councilman Coleman stated that was
the problem with the amendment.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 6 OF 21
Councilwoman Alger stated she did
not mind if trailer parks have the "A"frame signs if this is going to be
allowed for all businesses and she asked if the Council could include that the
signs also be used by RV and trailer parks.
for RV and trailer parks.
residential.
Mr.Gimbut asked what is the zoning
Councilwoman Alger answered i t is
Mr.Lee suggested to say that any
business regardless of the zoning district could have them.
Ms.Connelly pointed out that there
are also in-house businesses and she asked if the Council is going to allow
the "A"frame signs throughout residential subdivisions of the city.
Councilwoman Alger stated that "A"
frame signs are very informative when they are set outside mobile homes parks
but at the same time they are illegal,and if the Council is going to allow
them for the business community she would like to allow them for mobile home
parks too.
Mayor Damiano commented that the
mobile home parks use the signs temporarily and he did not see any problem
with that because a temporary sign is to be there only for a few days.
Councilman Cox commented that those
temporary signs are set on the right-of-way.
Mayor Damiano asked the public works
director how many feet are from the street to the wall of mobile home parks.
Public Works Director Rich Broman
explained that depending on the right-of-way it could be 13 feet or 16 feet,
depending on the kind of improvements.
Mr.Gimbut stated that there are
different kinds of businesses that fall within this category,such as places
for RVs,trailers,park models,and there is also Roadhaven which is none of
those,i t is a subdivision but i t looks like and operates like one of them.
He stated they needed to come up with appropriate descriptions that
encompasses this particular class of business.
Vice Mayor Eidson stated that he
would go ahead with the amendment and see where it goes.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 7 OF 21
AMENDMENT VOTE:In favor:Vice Mayor Eidson,Councilman Cox,Councilwoman
Alger,Mayor Damiano.
Opposed:Councilman Coleman,Councilwoman Barker.
The amendment carried.
MAIN VOTE:Unanimous.
Planning Division Manager Jim
Nakagawa clarified that this action excludes mobile home and RV parks from
being able to have "A"frame signs.
Mayor Damiano recessed the meeting
at 8:09 p.m.He reconvened the meeting at 8:18 p.m.
REQUEST BY TURF PARADISE RACE COURSE FOR
APPROVAL OF AN OFF-TRACK WAGERING
FACILITY AT THE WINCHESTER RESTAURANT )
)City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
briefed the Council on this item stating that according to State Law an off-
track wagering facility has to receive annual approval from the local
governing body;that unlike the liquor license,an application for off-track
wagering cannot be approved by the Arizona Department of Racing without the
local jurisdiction's approval.She stated this is the first renewal request
for the Winchester Restaurant.
hearing.
Mayor Damiano opened the public
Betty Carothers,4116 E.Broadway
Ave.,stated that besides herself there are a lot of other people who are
residents of Apache Junction and who work at the dog track;that the
simultaneous operation of the horse races by Turf Paradise has cut down on the
dog track operations.She explained that Greyhound Park had gone from 32
tellers to 13.
Mayor Damiano asked what are the
hours when the dog track and the off-track wagering facility operate.
Mrs.Carothers answered that the
horse track starts at 1:00 p.m.and the dog track at 2:00 p.m.
Bob Gray,6413 E.Vernon Ave.in
Scottsdale,operator of the racing dog kennels in Apache Junction,stated that
the tele-track in horse racing at the Winchester Restaurant has cut their
revenues down by 34%,which has direct result in the effect of the local
economy.He further explained the operation of the dog track and its
decrease.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 8 OF 21
Councilman Coleman asked if the Turf
Paradise operation hired the tellers the dog track lost.
Mr.Gray answered he could not say
that exactly but that a satellite facility has a very limited number of
tellers.
Councilman Coleman stated that Mr.
Gray is basically asking for a monopoly.
Mr.Gray explained that Apache
Junction is the only area where simultaneous casting of horses and dogs are
competing at the same time;that in Phoenix the horse track operates during
the day and the dog track at night,but in this particular instance they are
about two miles apart and that is why it is taking a cut off the money that
was going to the dog racing.
Councilman Coleman stated that we
can't say that you can bet on dogs but not on horses.
Mr.Gray replied that his point is
that you can't do both and have them survive;that the issue is whether or not
the live racing is going to put enough money in the economy that it is worth
saving or not.
Councilman Coleman asked if the dog
track operates in the day time and at night.
Mr.Gray answered that they operate
during the day five days a week and at night on Mondays;so,they compete with
Turf Paradise five days a week on the matinee schedule.
Councilman Coleman asked if that
could be adjusted so that they don't compete at the same time.
Barry Baldwin,Manager of Apache
Greyhound Park,2551 W.Apache Trail,spoke against renewal of the off-track
wagering facility.He stated that State Law does not permit the racing of
live greyhound and live horse racing at the same time in Maricopa.He
explained that in Apache Junction they cater to the winter visitors and that
is why they do it primarily in the afternoon.He further explained the
economic impact of both the greyhound racing and the off-track betting stating
that the Greyhound contributes four -and -half cents for every dollar in state
taxes compared to the one cent paid by the off-track betting.
Councilman Coleman asked Mr.Baldwin
if he said that off-track wagering is not required to do the charity days as
is required of the Greyhound Park.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 9 OF 21
Mr.Baldwin answered that charity
days are part of the Greyhound live racing license.
Vice Mayor Edison commented that
when the Council first approved this license last year,there was nobody from
Greyhound Park to bring these points to the Council's attention,and the best
time to stop something is before it starts.
Councilwoman Alger asked if the
Racing Commission rules over dog and horse racing.
Mr.Baldwin answered yes.
Councilwoman Alger stated that she
did not understand why the Racing Commission would allow the off-track betting
an the live racing to go on at the same time.
understand that either.
Mr.Baldwin replied he did not
Ms.Connelly explained that in State
Law,as part of Title 5,the distinction is based upon the population of the
county in which the facility is located;so,Maricopa County with a higher
population has different rules and regulations as opposed to Pinal County.
Mayor Damiano asked if the Racing
Commission said last year that if the Greyhound dropped off in business,then
the wagering facility would not be allowed to come back in.
Mr.Baldwin answered that he also
thought this was a conditional permit but he found out i t is not.
Ms.Connelly stated that she was at
the Racing Commission's hearing last year and the direction given to the
commission's staff was that prior to this renewal they develop some kind of
research that would or would not show the impact on Apache Junction Greyhound
Park,but they did not say it was a conditional license.
Judy Hamilton,18016 S.Cooper Rd.
in Chandler,representative of Turf Paradise Race Course,stated that they are
asking for the Council to grant the approval and then it goes before the
Racing Commission and it is up to them to grant the final approval.She added
that they have abided by all the rules set forth by the Council,therefore
they are back for the renewal for the following year.She explained that the
economy has been hurting everywhere and it's not a valid point to bring up
here.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 10 OF 21
Councilwoman Barker asked Ms.
Hamilton how much money the City has gained from the Winchester operation in
sales tax.
Ms.Hamilton answered she did not
know.
Vice Mayor Eidson commented that i f
this is going to the Racing Commission for final approval,these people could
present their arguments there too.
William McDaniel,11124 E.Sugar
Creek Dr.,owner of the Winchester,stated that the off-track wagering has
increased his allowance by about 50% over last year at this time and it helps
him survive in the summer;that it should be the people's choice whether they
want to bet on horses or dogs;that the Winchester Restaurant has been a very
small dent in the Greyhound's gains decline;and that the Winchester has only
two employees,so they have not taken tellers away from the Greyhound.
Vice Mayor Eidson commented that
when the Council gave their recommendation on this application at first,a lot
of money must have been spent to get things moving at the Winchester.
Mr.McDaniel replied that he had to
put some money up front for things needed for the off-track wagering.He
added that the Racing Commission has been in to check things and they have
been in compliance with the law.
Councilman Coleman asked if anybody
thought last year that the dog track might be interested in knowing that this
item was on the council agenda.
Mr.Baldwin answered that nobody did
because of the fact that the Racing Commission does not allow dog and horse
racing to be conducted at the same time,so they did not suspect that this
could happen in Apache Junction.
Councilwoman Barker commented that
last year many of Council members were not aware that this item was on the
agenda until they picked up their packets;then it was mentioned that this was
going to bring more revenues into the city and that is why she wanted to know
how much money the parimutuel betting had contributed to the City.
Mr.McDaniel answered that he did
not have those figures with him at this time but his main business is the
restaurant.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 11 OF 21
Councilwoman Alger asked if the
Council did not receive a letter from Greyhound last year addressing this
issue.
Councilwoman Barker answered it
happened after the meeting.
Mr.Baldwin confirmed that the
letter was sent after the Council approval.
Councilwoman Alger asked if they
were able to go to the Racing Commission hearing.
Mr.Baldwin answered yes.
Councilman Coleman asked if the
Council was supposed to just look at the application and if there have been
any problems with it.
Ms.Connelly explained that,unlike
a liquor license where the Council has to look at things such as zoning,in
this case it would be whatever the Council desires to do,however the
commission cannot approve this license over the Council's disapproval.
Mrs.Hamilton stated that i t is
legal by State Law for Turf Paradise to operate in Apache Junction so the
Council is not in violation by allowing them to be here.
Mr.Gimbut replied it is correct
that the license is legal,but the issues presented to the Council tonight
have nothing to do with whether the license is legal or not.
Daniel Luciano,12385 S.38th Street
in Phoenix,from the Phoenix Greyhound,stated that the amount that Turf
Paradise is handling in Apache Junction is minuscule compared to that of the
greyhound racing,and that the amount of money lost by Greyhound is far
greater than the amount the State is gaining from off-track betting in Apache
Junction.
Frank Kennemur,2945 E.Tepee,
stated that the decline in the economy is happening all over the State and he
mentioned there are other people who own race horses that are having problems
with their revenues because people don't gamble as much as they did before due
to the tightening of the dollar.He commented that if the Council does not
allow the off-track betting at the Winchester,they will go right outside the
city limits and set it there and the City will lose another revenue.
Mayor Damiano closed the public
hearing.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 12 OF 21
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT THE
REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF THE OFF-TRACK WAGERING FACILITY AT THE WINCHESTER
RESTAURANT,SUBMITTED BY TURF PARADISE RACE COURSE,BE RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA RACING COMMISSION.She stated that they have not
proven to be a bad businessman in our community and the Racing Commission will
have the facts and figures on both sides in front of them.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:In favor:Councilman Cox,Councilman Coleman,Vice Mayor Eidson,
Councilwoman Alger.
Opposed:Councilwoman Barker,Mayor Damiano.
The motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO.859:SPEED LIMIT ON LOST
DUTCHMAN BOULEVARD
)City Engineer Gordon Grandy
briefed the Council on this item stating that this is to lower the speed limit
on Lost Dutchman Blvd.from 40 MPH to 25 MPH.
hearing.
spoke in favor of the lower speed limit.
Mayor Damiano opened the public
Kay Fisher,5290 E.Southern Ave.,
Mayor Damiano closed the public
hearing there being no one else wishing to speak.
Vice Mayor. Eidson asked where would
the 25 MPH begin.
Mr.Grandy answered that it would be
from SR 88 easterly toward the city limits.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.859 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY,WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE,AND THE
READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 13 OF 21
City Clerk Kathy Connelly read,"AN
ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA,ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON LOCAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS;
REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY."
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.859,AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE READ AND ADOPTED.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
PERSONNEL POLICIES:DISCIPLINARY AND
APPEAL PROCEDURES
)Assistant City Manager George
Hoffman briefed the Council on this item.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT THE
FOLLOWING DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF REGARDING DISCIPLINARY AND APPEAL
PROCEDURES OF THE PERSONNEL POLICIES:THAT THE STAFF RESEARCH THE EXTENT TO
WHICH THE CITY MANAGER HAS AUTHORITY TO TAKE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST
EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS SUBORDINATE TO THE JUDGE;AND
THAT STAFF PROVIDE PROPOSED QUALIFICATIONS FOR A HEARING OFFICER AND A
PROPOSED PROCESS FOR SELECTING THAT HEARING OFFICER WITH THE OBJECTIVE THAT
THIS HEARING OFFICER WILL BE PROFESSIONAL,COMPETENT AND IMPARTIAL;AND
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THE BASIC CONCEPTS AND PROCESSES AS OUTLINED IN
RULES 20,21,AND 22 TO BE APPROPRIATE,AND THAT THE STAFF PROCEED WITH
REFINING THE LANGUAGE,RECEIVING EMPLOYEE COMMENT AND SUBMITTING THESE
COMMENTS FOR LEGAL COUNSEL FOR REVIEW;AND
THAT THE POLICIES PROVIDE A PROCESS WHEREIN AN EMPLOYEE CAN HAVE REVIEWS
BEFORE THE HEARING OFFICER AND THE PERSONNEL BOARD WHICH ARE PRIVATE,UNLESS
THE EMPLOYEE ASKS FOR A PUBLIC HEARING,AND THAT SUCH POLICY EXPLICITLY STATE
THAT ANY PROVISIONS FOR PRIVACY MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE'S OPEN
MEETING LAW;AND
THAT STAFF AFFIRM WITH LEGAL COUNSEL THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE PERSONNEL
BOARD TO REHEAR CASES.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 14 OF 21
Councilwoman Alger SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO GENERAL PLAN
TASK FORCE COMMITTEE
)City Manager Mike Lee briefed the
Council on this item stating that based on discussion at the work session,
there was some interest in enlarging the size of the committee to seventeen
members.
Councilwoman Barker asked for more
information since she did not attend the work session.
Mr.Lee stated that they discussed
having the seventeen applicants in the committee.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT THE
FOLLOWING DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TASK FORCE COMMITTEE WHICH INCLUDES AN INTENT IN PURPOSE
FROM THE CITY COUNCIL:
THAT ALL OF THE PERSONS WHO HAVE APPLIED TO THIS DATE --SEVENTEEN IN NUMBER --
BE ASKED TO SERVE ON THIS COMMITTEE,AND THAT THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS TASK
FORCE SHALL BE TO OBTAIN DETAILED CITIZEN INPUT CONCERNING THEIR DESIRES AND
VISION FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
Mayor Damiano read the names of the
appointees:Paul Connolly,Penny Secor,Pamela Ballantine,Patricia Meyers,
Glenn Allen,Bruce Noarse,Michael Baugh,Geneva Panasewics,Mary Shipman,
Maurice Metzger,Frank Kennemur,and William Lewis.County residents:Mary
Ann Coyne,William Laird,Niel Houck,Robert Melore,and Priscilla Wright.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
RESOLUTION NO.93-09,REMOVING TITLE 9
(AUTHORIZATION)ISSUE FROM MAY 18,
1993 BALLOT
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 15 OF 21
)City Manager Mike Lee briefed the
Council on this item stating that he was concerned that there was not enough
time to well inform the public on this issue before the general election.He
suggested to reschedule it for a later date --September or October--and allow
sufficient time for a good education program on the issue to the citizens of
Apache Junction.
Councilwoman Alger agreed with Mr.
Lee.She MOVED THAT RESOLUTION NO.93-09,REPEALING RESOLUTION NO.93-03 AND
REMOVING THE QUESTION CONCERNING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION TO
CONSTRUCT,PURCHASE,ACQUIRE OR LEASE ANY PLANT OR PROPERTY OR PORTION THEREOF
DEVOTED TO THE BUSINESS OF OR SERVICES RENDERED BY A WATER SYSTEM TO ENABLE
THE CITY TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS OF OWNING OR OPERATING A WATER SYSTEM FROM
THE BALLOT FOR THE ELECTION OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION OF MAY 18,1993;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY,BE APPROVED.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
Vice Mayor Eidson asked for an
specific time to bring back this issue before the Council so that they can
decide timely prior to the election.
City Clerk Kathy Connelly replied
the advertising time on a utility election the time is 30 days prior to the
election.
Vice Mayor Eidson suggested to bring
this issue back in July to set the election for September or October.
Ms.Connelly agreed that was a good
timing.
Mr.Lee suggested to even do it
earlier than July so that we don't run short on time.
Councilwoman Alger asked i f
regardless of the time that the Council wants this back,can staff start
planning an educational program and possibly bring it back to the Council at
that time also.
a senate bill now going through
City can have its elections;i f
dates,we would be told when we
soon might be pointless.
Ms.Connelly commented that there is
the Legislature that might impact when the
they decide to adopt consolidation of election
can have our elections;so to do anything too
The Council proceeded with the vote.
VOTE:Unanimous.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 16 OF 21
The motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO.93-07:NOTICE OF MAY 18,
1993 GENERAL ELECTION
)City Clerk Kathy Connelly briefed
the Council on this item stating that this ordinance contained a measure
asking'voter authorization for the City to engage in the utility business
which was included after the resolution mandating that the question be inAhe
ballot;but in light of the Council's action to remove it,now they need to
delete that reference from this resolution.She informed the Council that
double election boards at certain polling places will not be necessary at the
general election and it will reduce the cost by about $300.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT
RESOLUTION NO.93-07,PROVIDING NOTICE OF THE REGULAR GENERAL ELECTION;
ESTABLISHING POLLING PLACES AND VOTING DISTRICTS AND THE TIMES THAT SUCH POLLS
WILL BE OPEN;AND APPOINTING ELECTION OFFICIALS AND FIXING THEIR RATE OF
COMPENSATION,BE APPROVED WITH THE DELETION OF ANY REFERENCE TO THE
AUTHORIZATION FOR WATER UTILITY BUSINESS.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM
)Assistant City Manager George
Hoffman briefed the Council on this item stating that the implementation of
the deferred compensation program would allow the City to provide an
additional benefit for employees at a minimum cost to the organization;if the
City Council grants permission he will issue a Request for Proposals from plan
providers and bring back recommendations for potential plan providers.He
further explained the deferred compensation program.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT THE
FOLLOWING DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF REGARDING THE DEFERRED COMPENSATION
PROGRAM,THAT STAFF GO AHEAD AND SET UP WHAT THEY NEED TO AND BRING IT BACK TO
THE COUNCIL.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
PHASE I OF A SECURITY SYSTEM FOR THE
MAGISTRATE COURT AND AUTHORIZATION FOR
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 17 OF 21
USE OF CONTINGENCY FUNDS
)City Manager Mike Lee requested
that this item be postponed.He explained that unclear information on the
sales tax may put the City over the $10,000 limit.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT THE
COUNCIL POSTPONE THIS ITEM UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE CITY MANAGER CAN BRING IT
BACK IN WHATEVER FORM IT NEEDS TO BE.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF ON PROPOSED LEGISLATION OR ACTIONS
APPLICATION FOR ECONOMIC STIMULUS/
SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION PROGRAM
(ESSA)THROUGH CDBG
)Housing and Grants Coordinator
John Flumerfelt briefed the Council on this item stating that there are
several programs that this money might be directed to.He stated that to
date,the Legislature has not made any recommendations on this funding but at
this point we should try and position ourselves at best so that if this money
becomes available,we can make a credible application to benefit our own
community.He further explained how this grant could be developed which
included street improvements in areas of low -moderate income population.
City Manager Mike Lee mentioned that
since this is :a jobs creation program,the street improvement work would be
contracted out and not be done in house.
Mr.Flumerfelt stated that at this
point,the service area needs to be established and it is going to require an
income survey on those streets specifically.
Mr.Lee stated that if Congress
approves it,it appears that about $1.2 million would be available in Pinal
County.
Mr.Flumerfelt added that Gila
County is also included and that this has to go through CAAG.
Mr.Lee added that there would be
other communities involved such as Casa Grande who is applying for about five
different projects.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 18 OF 21
Mr.Flumerfelt stated that right now
we are just trying to see how best we can be competitive at CAAG.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT THE
COUNCIL GIVE DIRECTION TO STAFF TO GO AHEAD AND WORK WITH THE ECONOMIC
STIMULUS/SUPPLEMENT APPROPRIATION PROGRAM THROUGH THE CDBG AS THEY HAVE BEEN.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
SELECTION OF MEETING DATES,TIMES,LOCATIONS,AND PURPOSES
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT AN
EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M.AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M.ON
MONDAY,APRIL 19,1993 IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS RESPECTIVELY;AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M.ON
TUESDAY,APRIL 20,1993 IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM;AND
THAT A SPECIAL EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M.ON MONDAY,APRIL 12,
1993.Councilwoman Barker asked the Council to be excused from this meeting.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated
that the date is at the discretion of the Council.
Councilwoman Alger SECONDED THE
MOTION.
Councilwoman Barker stated that she
would attend the executive session if it can be any other day but Monday.She
AMENDED THE ORIGINAL MOTION THAT THE EXECUTIVE SESSION BE ON TUESDAY,APRIL
13.
Councilwoman Alger AGREED WITH THE
AMENDMENT.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
INFORMATION AND REPORTS
Councilwoman Barker announced Mayor Tom's birthday.
ADJOURNMENT
)Mayor Damiano adjourned the
meeting at 9:40 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 19 OF 21
Consent Agenda Items are as follows:
1.Acceptance of Agenda.
2.Acceptance of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 2,1993.
3.Acceptance of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 16,1993.
4.Approval of Parks and Recreation Department's Operating and Procedures
Manual.
5.Approval of License Agreement to Superstition Mountain Mental Health
Center,Inc.to operate the Center for the Handicapped.
6.Approval of Resolution No.93-08,recognizing April as Fair Housing
Month and affirming the City's belief in the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
ACCEPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF APRIL ,1993,BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 21ST DAY OF APRIL ,1993.
THOMAS DAMIANOHOMAS DAMIANO
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN CONNEL
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 20 OF 21
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the
minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache
Junction,Arizona,held on the 6th day of April,1993.I further certify that
the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 13th day of April,1993.
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 6,1993
PAGE 21 OF 21