HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-05-19 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 19,1992
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona,was held on May 19,1992,at the Apache Junction City Council
Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Damiano called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
INVOCATION
Councilman Coleman gave the Invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilwoman Alger led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen Present:Mayor Damiano
Vice Mayor Eidson
Councilwoman Barker
Councilman Perkins
Councilwoman Alger
Councilman Coleman
Councilman Cox
Staff Present:
Others Present:
City Manager Michael R.Lee
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut
Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel
Director of Public Works Rich Broman
City Engineer Gordon Grandy
Planning Division Manager Jim Nakagawa
Building and Safety Manager Lynn Underwood
Economic Development Manager John Schoeph
Finance Director Keith Lewis
Dir.of Parks & Recreation Jeff Bell
Operations Superintendent Doug Dobson
Engineering Admin.Assistant Theryn Hansen
Mr.Ed Barker,Vice Chairman of Health & Human
Services Commission
Mr.Ab Hameed of Capital Improvements Assoc.,
Inc.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 1 OF 14
Mr.Gregg Fisher of Dealers Awnings
Mr.Bob Day,400 N.Plaza Dr.
ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA
)Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT
THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED;AND
THAT THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT FOR EXCHANGE OF SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION AND APACHE JUNCTION CLEAN AND BEAUTIFUL,INC.,BE APPROVED;AND
THAT THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT FOR EXCHANGE OF SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BE APPROVED.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
AWARDS,PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
None.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
None.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Mike Lee reported that the Operations Division is working
on a gun -shooting range for the police Department at the public works
operations location;this is being done with in-house labor and equipment,and
it is 50% complete so police officers can start using it.
Mr.Lee reported on the CAP water intake for public works.He stated it
is about 99% completed and as soon as they install the water pumps,it will be
ready to work and that negotiations were still underway with Arizona Water Co.
regarding the water purchase.
Mr.Lee read a report on the sales tax collections as provided by Mr.
Craig Meusel,License Compliance Specialist.He stated that comparing this
report to the one a year ago,it is not a bad report.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FY 92-93
THROUGH FY 96-97
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 2 OF 14
city engineer to speak on this item.
)Mayor Damiano called upon the
City Engineer Gordon Grandy stated
that as of August of 1990 the City qualified for an Arizona Dept.of Commerce
$10,000 Grant to assist the community in formulating a 5 -Year Capital
Improvement Plan and that the final report is due for submittal to the State
by June 30,1992.He explained that the plan was compiled from each
department list of projects which were prioritized and then balanced based on
revenue projections;that the plan has had two formal published revisions due
to changes suggested by the CIP Review Committee,the Planning and Zoning
Commission,the Transportation Board,and a list of priorities discussed by
the City Council at a work session.He stated the Planning and Zoning
Commission has decided that the Capital Improvement Plan fits within the
General Plan and is in the best interest of the community.Mr.Grandy
recommended approval of the Capital Improvement Plan and described the CIP
through overhead projections.
Mayor Damiano opened the
the public and asked if there was someone wanting to speak.There
one,he closed the public hearing and asked for a motion.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 92-93 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR
APPROVED WITH ALL THE NUMBERED CHANGES FROM LIST "A".
hearing to
being no
THAT THE
96-97,BE
Vice Mayor Eidson SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:In favor:Vice Mayor Eidson,Councilman Coleman,Councilwoman Alger,
Councilman Cox,Councilman Perkins,Mayor Damiano.
Opposed:Councilwoman Barker.
The motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO ENGAGE
SERVICES OF MEYER,HENDRICKS,VICTOR,
OSBORN AND MALEDON TO PERFORM LEGAL
SERVICES AND REPRESENT THE CITY WITH
RESPECT TO PROPOSED STATE LEGISLATIVE
REDISTRICTING
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 3 OF 14
)Mayor Damiano called upon the
city attorney to speak on this item.
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut stated
that Pinal County,Casa Grande and Apache Junction are seeking to engage the
services of Meyer,Hendricks,Victor,Osborn and Maledon to be represented
before the U.S.Department of Justice and the Arizona Legislature to seek a
new district for Pinal County and these cities.He stated the Hooper
Amendment is one proposal before the legislature and described it.He briefed
the Council on the status of the matter and how the law firm will handle it.
He stated that the law firm will represent the City in the redistricting
process for a sum not to exceed $5,000 and that legal fees would be no more
than $10,000,a portion of which would be from Casa Grande and Pinal County.
Vice Mayor asked if any other cities
in the county are going to be involved.
Mr.Gimbut replied he does not know
and that this matter has moved too fast for strong contacts with the other
cities;that he has contacted Eloy and asked them to make contact with
Florence and Coolidge but it's unclear what they will do;that he talked to
the City Manager for Kearny and he indicated their council's position is that
they would rather not get involved.
Mayor Damiano asked if Pinal County
does not approve the $5,000,what will Apache Junction do?
Mr.Gimbut replied that to date the
law firm has been acting as an extension of himself with the clear
understanding that there is no agreement by anybody to pay them any money.He
stated that Mr.Jack LaSota has indicated his firm is willing to represent the
two communities and attempt to work within the monies that are available.
Vice Mayor Eidson commented it seems
to him that the other communities that are affected as negatively as Apache
Junction and Casa Grande would be willing to help.He suggested that a letter
be sent to those communities and ask them for their help on this matter.
Mr.Gimbut agreed with Vice Mayor
Eidson and commented that the Gila River Indian Reservation is also upset with
the redistricting plan and there is an indication that they might be willing
to make a financial contribution.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT THE
CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY BE AUTHORIZED TO ENGAGE SERVICES OF MEYER,
HENDRICKS,VICTOR,OSBORN AND MALEDON TO PERFORM LEGAL SERVICES AND REPRESENT
THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSED STATE LEGISLATIVE
REDISTRICTING WITH A CAP OF $5,000.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 4 OF 14
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
PRESENTATION,DISCUSSION AND ACTION ON
FY 1992-93 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM HEALTH
AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
city clerk to speak on this item.
the Council on this item.
Councilwoman Alger SECONDED THE
Mayor Damiano called upon the
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly briefed
Mr.Ed Barker,Vice Chairman of the
Commission briefed the Council on their recommendations.
these five agencies do for the community.
Vice Mayor Eidson asked what is it
Mr.Barker briefly described the
services that each one of the agencies provide to the community.
Vice Mayor Eidson asked if the
Commission is convinced that the majority of the money will be spent in Apache
Junction.He commented the Salvation Army contributes to some national or
state organization.
Mr.Barker replied the Salvation
Army contributes a 10% fee to the state organization but funding from the City
is exempt from that.He stated he personally feels that if any City funding
goes out of the community,this is very little;that these organizations are
aware of the city ordinance not allowing that;that the City Clerk receives
quarterly reports;that four of these agencies have been funded before and
have provided information proving they spend the money in Apache Junction.
Councilwoman Barker asked what is
the matching fund for Superstition Mountain Mental Health Center.
Mr.Barker replied it is a minimum
of $3.00 for every $1.00 and as much as $4.00.He stated that funding for
this organization has been decreased this year so matching funds have been
lost in this case,however,the other organizations may be capable of
receiving matching funds.He explained that the reasoning for reducing funds
for the SMMHC was that their situation has improved considerably in the last
year because of funding received from PGBHA which is a funding organization
for Pinal and Gila counties.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 5 OF 14
Councilman Perkins MOVED THAT
RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION FOR FY 1992-93 HUMAN SERVICES
FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000,TO INCLUDE THE AMOUNT AND MANNER OF
DISTRIBUTION,BE APPROVED;AND
THAT STAFF BE AUTHORIZED TO DRAFT CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE AGENCIES
FOR APPROVAL FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
Councilwoman Barker pointed out the
Commission offered two options for consideration by the Council and the
difference between the two doesn't seem to be much.She asked if Council
would like to talk about it.
Councilman Coleman stated he is not
sure he would like to see the funding increased;that he knows the agencies
provide good services,that they need the money and also can get matching
funds,but he has a problem moving in that direction.
Mayor Damiano asked that in the
event the City's revenues continue to increase,if any of these agencies can
request some more funding?
Ms.Connelly replied that Ordinance
659 requires that their request be submitted by the end of January prior to
the end of the fiscal year,so then Council could reopen the issue,but once
contracts are awarded they are for a specific period of time.The Council
could also indicate the possibility of an increase in the contract language
itself.
Mr.Lee commented that Council at
this point could decide to only fund $54,000 but if revenues were more later,
the Council could approve a higher funding level then.
Councilwoman Barker AMENDED THE
MOTION TO PUT A PROVISION IN EACH CONTRACT THAT IF CITY FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE
THAT THE CONTRACT AMOUNTS COULD BE INCREASED TO $60,000.
up a time to review the contracts.
be at least six months from now.
after January 1,1993.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 6 OF 14
Councilwoman Alger suggested to set
Councilwoman Barker stated it should
Mr.Lee suggested that the time be
Councilwoman Barker ASKED THAT AFTER
JANUARY 1,1993 BE ADDED TO THE AMENDMENT AS THE DATE FOR REVIEW OF THE
CONTRACTS.
Councilwoman SECONDED THE AMENDMENT.
AMENDMENT VOTE:In favor:Councilman Coleman,Councilwoman Barker,Vice
Mayor Eidson,Councilwoman Alger,Mayor Damiano.
Opposed:Councilman Perkins,Councilman Cox.
The amendment carried.
MAIN VOTE:In favor:Councilman Coleman,Councilman Perkins,Councilwoman
Barker,Vice Mayor Eidson,Councilwoman Alger,Mayor
Damiano.
Opposed:Councilman Cox.
The main motion carried.
Mayor Damiano called for a recess at
8:03 p.m.The meeting resumed at 8:18 p.m.
DISCUSSION REGARDING CITY COMPLEX
MASTERPLANNING
city manager to speak on this item.
)Mayor Damiano called upon the
City Manager Mike Lee briefed the
Council on the need of a masterplan for the city complex.He stated that in
order to accomplish this he asked Capital Improvement Associates to provide a
scope of work that would assist the City in this effort.He then introduced
representatives of CIA to provide additional information.
Mr.Ab Hameed of CIA explained to
the Council the masterplanning concept and its advantages through samples of
their work in other cities.
would need to be updated every so often.
Vice Mayor asked if the masterplan
Mr.Hameed replied that would be up
to the City.He stated if the masterplan is done in a team mode they can get
a very clear picture of where things will be and as the masterplan is
implemented into actual planning,changes may happen then,but the City could
keep it as planned or change something.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 7 OF 14
Vice Mayor Eidson was concerned that
the new masterplan would fall in the same category that the old one which has
been outdated for many years,that it cost a lot of money and nothing was done
with it.
Mr.Hameed replied that should not
happen if all the issues are addressed in planning,what the City wants and
where it wants to be.
Vice Mayor Eidson commented there
was a time when the City was applying for a grant which required an updated
master plan in order to qualify just for the application.
Mr.Lee stated there may be some
elements of development that would be available for grant funds such as a
program for the Library construction through the federal government and the
Community Development Block Grant funds that can be for the Senior Center.He
stated he did not think there would be funds for construction of city hall or
the police building,but some portions of the projects would be eligible.
Councilman Perkins MOVED THAT THE
CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ASSOCIATES,INC.IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,500 FOR CITY COMPLEX MASTERPLANNING.
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF ON PROPOSED LEGISLATION OR ACTIONS
Vice Mayor Eidson SECONDED THE
DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES
)Mayor Damiano called upon the
city manager to speak on this item.
City Manager Mike Lee stated that
the Council had requested financial information on a 20,000 square foot
building and a 24,000 square foot building,and that information was provided
outlining a financing alternative based on $3 million as a maximum project
figure based on information by Mr.Mark Reader of Peacock,Hislop,Staley &
Given,Inc.He then introduced Mr.Ab Hameed of Capital Improvement
Associates to make some comments.
Mr.Hameed explained how they
arrived at the cost estimates and how it was budgeted.He stated that the
climate for bidding is highly favorable and competitive;that they would work
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 8 OF 14
closely with the plan and keep City staff informed as they move along into the
project.
Mr.Lee stated the $200,000 in the
preliminary proposed budget is sufficient debt service for FY 1992-93 budget.
He stated that because the current market interest rates are so low there
would be an advantage in getting the financing in place as soon as possible.
He explained this may require that the City would have what is called
"negative arbitrage"for a short period of time,which means the City would
borrow the bonds and pay a certain interest rate but the bonds are then
invested at a different interest rate so there would be some short-term cost;
in other words,the City would earn less then what is going to have to pay on
the interest.He stated a 20 -year period would be in order and if the City
can get the low interest rate for that period of time,the savings would be
greater than the extra costs in the short period of time.
Mr.Mark Reader distributed
information regarding the financing options and described them.He stated
there are two ways for doing the financing and explained them as follows.
1)One way is to finance the
$3,500,000 through the Municipal Property Corporation,which is the issuer of
the bonds and they would issue what is called "Municipal Facilities Revenue
Bonds."They would give the money to the City who would agree to repay that
money back over a 20 -year period and that the city agrees to pledge all or a
portion of its excise taxes.He recommended that the City proceed in this
manner.If the City does pledge all or portion of the excise taxes,there is
a high probability to get the bond issue rated by Moody's and/or Standard and
Poor's and,to the extent they could get an investment at great rating,he
estimates the City would save about $400,000 in interest over the life of this
bond issue.He stated that the pledge of those excise taxes does not limit
the City's ability to use that money as the City is basically lending its
credit.
2)The other way is for the City to
issue Certificates of Participation which is a big lease that is broken up
into smaller pieces and,by law,when a city does a lease -purchase arrangement
it can only get into debt once a year so it can annually appropriate those
debt service payments.So,legally the City could issue Certificates of
Participation for $3,500,000 and have debt service requirements of about
$325,000,and if the City has a bad year five years from now and it doesn't
want to make the debt service payment,it just doesn't make it.But then the
Trustee who acts on behalf of the bond holders comes and releases the facility
or sells it.So,from the legal prospective the City can walk away from it at
any time and that is why it is more expensive,because the risk level is
higher from an industry.
Councilman Perkins MOVED THAT THE
FOLLOWING DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH THE DESIGN
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 9 OF 14
AND CONSTRUCTION FOR NEW POLICE SAFETY FACILITIES SUCH THAT THE TOTAL COST OF
THE PROJECT DOES NOT EXCEED $3 MILLION.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
Mr.Lee clarified that the $3
million estimate is for construction and soft cost only and does not include
the reserve fund and the bond issue which would raise the amount to about $3.5
million.
VOTE:In favor:Councilman Coleman,Councilwoman Alger,Councilman Cox,
Councilman Perkins,Vice Mayor Eidson,Mayor Damiano.
Opposed:Councilwoman Barker.
Councilwoman Barker explained that
the need for a larger police department is not in contention,however she did
not believe the 24,000 square foot police building will make this community
safer or more secure nor does she believe that spending $3 million for such a
facility demonstrates fiscal responsibility of public monies.
The motion carried.
DIRECTION TO STAFF CONCERNING RECOMMENDED
CHANGES IN THE BUILDING CODE REGARDING
PARK MODELS AND AWNINGS
city manager to speak on this item.
)Mayor Damiano called upon the
City Manager Mike Lee stated that
because of increasing concerns from virtually all members of the RV industry a
working committee was formed which included City staff,members of the RV
industry and citizens of Apache Junction to study the issue.He stated the
committee recommends to the Council that an ordinance be adopted that would
allow the Building Official to enter into contracts or agreements with
specific RV resort parks voluntarily for compliance with certain requirements.
Mr.Gregg Fisher of Dealers Awnings
and member of the committee,spoke in favor.
member of the committee,spoke in favor.
Mr.Bob Day,400 N.Plaza Dr.,
Mr.Lee added that the RV Park
industry and the park model dealers have volunteered to personally mail out
information and inform all of the residents in the parks,if this is
successfully passed,of the changes and give the City some credit,and Mr.
Weiner agreed to also inform the people in his parks.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 10 OF 14
Mayor Damiano commended the
committee for their work.
Vice Mayor MOVED THAT THE FOLLOWING
DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF REGARDING RECOMMENDED CHANGES IN THE BUILDING CODE
CONCERNING PARK MODELS AND AWNINGS,THAT CHANGES BE MADE IN THE CODE TO
REFLECT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
DIRECTION TO STAFF ALLOWING PRE -HUD (1976)
MOBILE HOME UNITS TO BE MOVED WITHIN THE
CITY LIMITS
Mayor Eidson to speak on this item.
Mayor Damiano called upon Vice
Vice Mayor Eidson stated that the
Council had approved some regulations restricting Pre -HUD mobile homes from
being moved into or anywhere in the City.He stated he would like that the
Council to allow these units to be moved within the City from park to park.
Councilman Cox stated that a fire
safety inspection be done on any unit moved within the City.
Councilman Perkins asked Building
and Safety Manager Lynn Underwood if the Council were to reverse their past
action,if the City would be obligated to perform inspections according to
State guidelines.
Building and Safety Manager Lynn
Underwood replied that presently Pre -HUD mobile homes are required by the
State to be inspected if they are moving within the city limits.He explained
that if Pre -HUD were allowed to move within the city limits the City would
have to do the inspections,which is essentially utility connections and a
blocking inspection,but the City does not perform fire inspections.
Councilman Perkins commented that if
Council allows the units to move into the City they would be required to
obtain a permit,then Building would have to do the utility connection and
blocking inspection.He asked that in the case something happens later that
starts a fire and somebody gets hurt,if the City has liability.
Mr.Underwood replied the court
would have to decide that,but his impression is there might be a sense of
false security on behalf of the applicant or the person moving the mobile home
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 11 OF 14
in;the owner does not know they are not there to do a life safety inspection,
that they are there to simply fulfill the state requirements on the blocking
and the utility connection only.
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut stated
the City will not be liable for duties it does not perform.He explained that
the only time the City will be liable is when the City does not perform its
duties right;if its duty is to check on the utility connections and the
blocking and the problem is related to this,then the City would be liable;
but if it's not related to those duties then it will not.
Vice Mayor Edison MOVED THAT THE
FOLLOWING DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF REGARDING ALLOWING PRE -HUD (1976)MOBILE
HOME UNITS TO BE MOVED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS,THAT PRE -HUD MOBILE HOMES BE
ALLOWED TO MOVE FROM PARK TO PARK IN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,THIS TO COME
BACK TO THE COUNCIL ON THE SECOND MEETING IN JUNE.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MEETING.
VOTE:In favor:Vice Mayor Eidson,Councilman Coleman,Councilwoman Alger,
Councilwoman Barker,Mayor Damiano.
Opposed:Councilman Cox,Councilman Perkins.
The motion carried.
SELECTION OF MEETING DATES,TIMES,LOCATIONS,AND PURPOSES
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT AN
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M.AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M.BE HELD ON
MONDAY,JUNE 1,1992 IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS RESPECTIVELY;AND
THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M.BE HELD ON TUESDAY,JUNE 2,1992 IN THE
CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
INFORMATION AND REPORTS
City Manager Mike Lee read a letter from the Department of Commerce
regarding a $220,000 CDBG grant awarded to the City to be used to continue the
owner -occupied Housing Rehabilitation Program and to remove architectural
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 12 OF 14
barriers at the city complex and the construction of handicap accessible
bathrooms.
Mayor Damiano read a thank you letter from the Superstition Mountain
Mental Health Center regarding the help provided by the Parks and Recreation
Department at their Annual Easter Pancake Breakfast.
ADJOURNMENT
p.m.
Consent Agenda Items are as follows:
1.Acceptance of Agenda.
The meeting adjourned at 9:26
2.Acceptance of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 5,1992.
3.Approval of Renewal of Agreement for exchange of services between the
City and Apache Junction Clean & Beautiful,Inc.
4.Approval of Renewal of Agreement for exchange of services between City
and Industrial Development Authority.
ACCEPTED THIS 2ND DAY OF JUNE ,1992,BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE ,1992.
THOMAS DAMIANO
Mayor
ATTEST:
6 2-
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 13 OF 14
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the
minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache
Junction,Arizona,held on the 19th day of May,1992.I further certify that
the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 26th day of May,1992.
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MAY 19,1992
PAGE 14 OF 14