HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-06-02 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 2,1992
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona,was held on June 2,1992 at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers
pursuant to the notice required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Damiano called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m.
INVOCATION
Councilman Coleman gave the Invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilman Cox led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen Present:Mayor Damiano
Councilwoman Barker
Councilman Perkins
Councilwoman Alger
Councilman Coleman
Councilman Cox
(Vice Mayor Eidson was on vacation.)
Staff Present:
Others Present:
City Manager Michael R.Lee
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel
Director of Public Works Rich Broman
City Engineer Gordon Grandy
Interim Dir.of Development Serv./
Planning Division Manager Jim Nakagawa
Housing Rehabilitation Tech.John Flummerfelt
Judge Corwin Brundrett
ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA
)Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT
THE CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED;AND
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 1 OF 13
AND THAT AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN SPECIAL WATER PROJECTS AS PART OF THE
PINAL COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL ALLIANCE,BE APPROVED.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
AWARDS,PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
City Engineer Gordon Grandy
introduced Mr.Brian Patterson from the Arizona Department of Transportation
to give a presentation on their construction schedule for widening and
improving Idaho Road between SR 360 and Scenic Street.
Mr.Patterson briefed the Council on
the construction schedule and stated they plan completion of the project in
November.He described the major activities for June which include a detour
at SR 360 and signage to decrease the traffic flow on Idaho Rd.
City Manager Mike Lee asked if the
detour at the freeway means the Idaho exit will be closed.
Mr.Patterson replied they will try
to keep it open for local traffic and discourage thru-traffic.
Mayor Damiano asked if there will be
any provisions for street lights.
Mr.Patterson replied that at the
intersections there will be street lights.
Mr.Grandy stated the existing
street lights will only be relocated,that there will not be addition of new
street lights,and that traffic lights will be at Scenic Street/SR 88/Idaho
and at Broadway Avenue.
Mayor Damiano asked if there would
be a traffic light at Southern Ave.
Mr.Grandy replied Southern will not
have a traffic light nor a 4 -way stop and it will be priority for the north-
south traffic on Idaho Rd.
Mayor Damiano was concerned that
traffic will not do the proper stop at that intersection.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 2 OF 13
Mr.Mike Harrington of ADOT stated
striping marking will take care of that;that they will put twelve -inch stop
bars that will indicate traffic to stop.
Mayor Damiano stated that will not
mean anything.
Councilman Perkins asked Mr.Grandy
to make sure the Fire District is informed of construction and detours.
Mr.Dean Zarosinsky of Nesbitt
Contracting Company,replied the local authorities will be notify.
Councilman Perkins asked what was
the rationale for not putting a traffic signal at Southern Ave.
Mr.Grandy replied the traffic on
Southern did not warrant a traffic signal at this time.
Mr.Patterson stated they are making
provisions to lay conduit for future signalization.
Councilman Perkins asked who will be
responsible for the cost of the signalization when it is warranted.
Mr.Patterson replied ADOT will pay
50% of the cost and the City the other 50%.
Councilwoman Barker asked if there
will be a crosswalk at Southern.
Mr.Grandy replied that is not in
the plans.He stated that when there is four lanes of traffic with a left-
turn lane often there are gaps to cross the street.
projected speed limit.
hour.
to the mail boxes.
Councilman Perkins asked what is the
Mr.Grandy replied 35 miles per
Mayor Damiano asked what will happen
Mr.Zarosinsky stated they will
propose to the Post Office that the boxes on the east side be relocated
temporarily on the west side,that way one side will not have to cross the
street during construction activity.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 3 OF 13
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
None.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Mike Lee gave a statistical report on the public works
cleanup week.He stated that through the $10 fee the City recovered the
landfill and fuel costs;that there were 100 calls more than the previous
cleanup in December.
Mr.Lee gave a financial report and stated that as of May 31,1992
revenues are higher but expenditures are about the same as they were last
fiscal year.He pointed out that part of the increased revenues is
attributable to the $600,000 grant fund from ADOT for improvements on US 60.
Mr.Lee reported he attended a meeting of the Arizona Department of
Commerce where they made the final decision on granting the contracts for
economic development highway projects and Apache Junction was awarded a grant
of $71,000 for development of a shopping center on US 60.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ORDINANCE NO.830,PZ-92-03,AMENDMENT
TO THE NONCONFORMING USE PROVISIONS OF
THE ZONING ORDINANCE
)Planning Division Manager Jim
Nakagawa stated this was an item under direction to staff on the April 7th
meeting and that Council wished the amendment to proceed.He then briefed the
Council on this item.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.830 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE
ORDINANCE BE WAIVED.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly read,
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,
ARIZONA,AMENDING SECTION 3.0104 AND SECTION 3.0108 OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE APACHE
JUNCTION,ARIZONA,ZONING ORDINANCE,ALLOWING FOR UTILITY REPAIRS,ALTERATION,
AND REPLACEMENTS FOR NONCONFORMING USES;REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;
AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 4 OF 13
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.830,AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO.92-10:VACATION OF A
DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY AND RESOLUTION
NO.92-11:ABANDONMENT OF A FEDERALLY
PATENTED EASEMENT ON SHIPROCK STREET
briefed the Council on this item.
N.Wickiup,spoke on his behalf.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
)City Engineer Gordon Grandy
Mr.Charles Gifford applicant,1365
Councilwoman Barker pointed out that
Mr.Gifford submitted the application for abandonment and that the Development
Coordinating Committee and the Transportation Board decided the abandonment is
not a problem as long as the properties involved (14 & 15)are owned by the
same owner,but Mr.Gifford would not care to participate in that ownership.
Mr.Gifford stated he would not like
to buy property 14 because until a dam is built in that area it would not be
feasible for him to buy it.He stated one of his neighbors has applied to buy
two other properties and maybe he would be interested on property 14.
Councilwoman Barker commented there
seems to be a reluctance on the part of the two committees to recommend the
abandonment if there wasn't a single ownership due to access.
Mr.Grandy replied that was the
majority vote of both committees.
Councilwoman Barker asked about
access on Bowman.
Mr.Grandy replied the access on
Bowman is reasonable to a certain point and explained the circumstances.
Councilwoman Barker stated she is
looking for a kind of a situation that would answer the problems of Mr.
Gifford as well as the problems that Mr.Grandy is foreseeing.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 5 OF 13
Mr.Grandy replied that the problem
they did foresee was accessibility to one of the lots,but if it's owned
together with one of the adjacent lots,that problem goes away.
Mr.Gifford asked if they did that,
would a septic system be feasible?
Mr.Grandy replied he could not
answer to that because he did not know what the criteria is in that case.
Councilwoman Alger stated she lives
in that area and that she has been told that no septic tanks are allowed in
that area of the flood plain.
Mr.Gifford stated his house is
already built on a pad and that they would want to keep Bowman Road open
because the lot on the side of Cortez Road is cut in two by the Weekes Wash
and it needs to have access at both ends;the lot owner could not make a
roadway through the wash.
Councilwoman Alger pointed out that
Bowman on the north is an access road that is already open.
Councilwoman Barker commented that
the lot that is predominately a wash is not built on and is not being used at
the moment and there is a possibility that the City would extend the access on
Bowman to the south.
Public Works Director Rich Broman
stated there is a policy about extending dirt roads;if two or more people
whose lots are relative to Bowman can have access through another road as
their primary access,the City would not open Bowman;if they wanted to use
Bowman for access this would be considered a private road and the City would
not maintain it;but,if a third person developed a house there,then the City
would open Bowman and maintain it.
Councilwoman Barker asked if that
would alleviate part of the problem they're talking about.
Mr.Grandy replied it would not
alleviate the City's problem,there is still a major contention on how to
cross Weekes Wash.
Mr.Broman commented that a good
example of the problem would be other private access roads across Weekes
Washes that are accessible when the wash is dry but not during a major storm.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 6 OF 13
Mr.Gifford stated that in his
opinion the opening of Bowman Road would serve more people than the
abandonment he is requesting because that would never go across the wash.
Mayor Damiano asked Mr.Gifford if
he has contacted the owner of property 14.
Mr.Gifford replied he has sent to
Mr.Warren,the owner,the abandonment documents for his signature.
Councilman Coleman pointed out that
the Transportation Board voted 3-2 and asked Mr.Grandy why the two votes were
against the motion.
Mr.Grandy replied it was because
the members did not think they had the right to put on the stipulation that
the two parcels had to be combined.
Councilwoman Alger commented that
knowing the area quite well,property 14 will never be built on until
something is done with the federal flood plain.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT
RESOLUTION NO.92-10,DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS SHIPROCK STREET DESCRIBED IN ABANDONMENT CASE AB -92-01,IS NO LONGER
NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY VACATED AS A PRESENT OR
FUTURE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED;AND
THAT RESOLUTION NO.92-11,DECLARING THAT A CERTAIN FEDERALLY PATENTED
EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES COMMONLY KNOWN AS SHIPROCK STREET
DESCRIBED IN ABANDONMENT CASE AB -92-01,IS NO LONGER NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC USE
AS A ROADWAY AND IS HEREBY ABANDONED AND EXTINGUISHED AS A PRESENT OR FUTURE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
Councilwoman Alger SECONDED THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING NEEDS )
)Mr.Flummerfelt stated that this
public hearing is to solicit input from the public and the Council as far as
potential needs of the community that can be addressed through certain funding
sources such as Community Development Block Grants.He stated there is the
possibility this year for job creation/retention/hiring related to a jobs bill
that may or may not develop;however,if there are needs identified that
relate to that,the City can then use the input for an application.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 7 OF 13
There was no input from the public
or the Council.
Interim Director of Development
Services Jim Nakagawa stated there are usually a series of public hearings on
this matter,that there was a public meeting the previous day at the program
room of the Library,and that the next public hearing will be on July 6th at
the Council's work session.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF ON PROPOSED LEGISLATION OR ACTIONS
US 60/BROADWAY/ROYAL PALM
)City Engineer Gordon Grandy
briefed the Council on background information regarding this intersection.He
stated that the freeway has taken most of the east -west traffic and this
caused a significant drop on Southern Avenue and US 60,but Broadway traffic
is increasing;that projections for the year 2000 are that US 60 will get more
traffic and Broadway's will continue to increase.He then explained traffic
counts taken in those areas before and after the freeway opened.
Mr.Grandy stated they proceeded to
hire a consultant to study some design alternatives for that intersection for
the future and that ADOT estimated their share for any improvements there
would be $300,000;that a variety of alternatives were considered and three
alternatives were preferred,which he explained;and the consultant,staff and
the Transportation Board decided on alternate "C"because of what it provides
overall for the whole community.
option "C"would cost.
to about $470,000.
of it would be ADOT's contribution.
Councilman Coleman asked how much
Mr.Grandy replied that is estimated
Councilwoman Barker asked how much
Mr.Grandy replied that it would
have been $300,000 but some of that money has already been put somewhere else
such as the Capital Improvement Plan.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 8 OF 13
Councilwoman Alger asked how long it
would be before the intersection is changed.
Mr.Grandy replied that would depend
on the schedule for utilities and if the acquisition of the right of way
problems could be avoided so the City would not have the lengthy process of
property negotiations or condemnation procedures,but design might take six to
nine months;and if the City does not proceed by using up the ADOT money on
other things,the money can be used on this project.
Councilwoman Alger asked that if the
City did not have the ADOT money for this project,what would the City begin
doing.
Mr.Grandy replied they could start
with the design and contacting the utilities for any relocations,that some
times it takes the utilities a year's notification if there are any
relocations.
Councilwoman Alger asked if the
Council gave approval to begin the project now,it conceivably be two years
before any construction is done.
Mr.Grandy replied two years would
be about right,that the approval they're looking for tonight is to hire a
consultant to start looking at detailed plans.
Public Works Director Rich Broman
stated one alternative may be that if they get the design "on a shelf"and if
there are unused funds in the federal aid program,the City might have a
chance of inserting that project and getting some funds that normally would
not be available for that;that many of other cities do this and he thought
this project was a good candidate.
Mr.Grandy stated he had anticipated
that federal funds would be available for this project.
Mayor Damiano stated that he lives
in the area and uses that intersection constantly and he did not see any
problem with the way it is now;there were problems before when Broadway
Avenue was open but now with the cul-de-sac on Broadway they are having no
problems.He thought they could wait for a couple of more years.
Mr.Grandy stated that the cul-de-
sac was a temporary solution but he did not know for how long.
Councilwoman Barker commented that
by getting the plans "on the shelf"would allow the City to do the project in
the future.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 9 OF 13
Councilman Cox suggested to hold off
on the project.He stated nobody has been killed there yet but it will happen
once they open Broadway again.
Mr.Grandy replied if they open
Broadway there it will be with a signal light.
Councilman Cox insisted there will
still be people killed there.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT THE
CITY MANAGER BE AUTHORIZED TO DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED WITH FINALIZING STREET
IMPROVEMENT AND SIGNALIZATION PLANS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF US 60,BROADWAY
AND ROYAL PALM PREDICATED ON CONCEPT PLAN "C"AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY'S
TRANSPORTATION BOARD.
MOTION.
VOTE:In favor:
Opposed:
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
Councilman Perkins,Councilwoman Barker,Councilwoman Alger,
Councilman Coleman,Mayor Damiano.
Councilman Cox.
The motion carried.
CABLE T.V.PUBLIC ACCESS CHANNEL TO EITHER
REQUIRE THE CHANNEL OR TO AMEND THE ORDI-
NANCE DELETING THE REQUIREMENT
)City Manager Mike Lee stated that
at the time the cable T.V.license was awarded with a requirement to provide
three access channels;one governmental channel,one educational channel and
one local public access/origination channel.He stated because of the lack of
interest the local access channel was never provided but recently there has
been an individual interested in seeing one who is not a resident of the City.
He explained this would increase the rates and that there is a problem with
controlling what is shown in the public access channel.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT THE
FOLLOWING DIRECTION BE GIVEN TO STAFF REGARDING A T.V.PUBLIC ACCESS CHANNEL
IN APACHE JUNCTION TO PROCEED WITH CHANGING THE CONTRACT AND ORDINANCE TO
DELETE THE PUBLIC ACCESS CHANNEL.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
Councilwoman Barker asked if there
is a way to work into this contract at this point getting some minimal
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 10 OF 13
equipment that the Council could use on the governmental channel,such as
video recorder and a VCR.
Mr.Lee replied that has not been
discussed yet but he believes Triax would be receptive to that concept.
Councilwoman Barker commented they
would also need some special lights which would be relatively minimal compared
with the possibility of building a studio.
Councilwoman Alger ADDED TO THE
ORIGINAL MOTION THAT NEGOTIATIONS ON EQUIPMENT BE DISCUSSED WITH TRIAX CABLE
VISION.
Councilman Coleman AGREED WITH THE
CHANGE AND SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
SELECTION OF MEETING DATES,TIMES,LOCATIONS,AND PURPOSES
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT AN
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M.AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M.BE HELD ON
MONDAY,JUNE 15,1992,IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM AND CITY COUNCIL
CHAMBERS RESPECTIVELY;AND
THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:00 P.M.BE HELD ON TUESDAY,JUNE 16,1992 IN
THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
INFORMATION AND REPORTS
Mayor Damiano read a letter from Congressman Kolbe regarding a $220,000
grant award from the Arizona Dept.of Commerce for the City Housing
Rehabilitation program.
ADJOURNMENT )
)
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 11 OF 13
Consent Agenda Items are as follows:
1.Acceptance of Agenda.
2.Acceptance of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 19,1992.
3.Authorization to participate in Special Water Projects as part of the
Pinal County Governmental Alliance.
ACCEPTED THIS 16TH DAY OF JUNE ,1992,BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 17TH DAY OF JUNE ,1992.
THOMAS DAMIANO
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 12 OF 13
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the
minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache
Junction,Arizona,held on the 2nd day of June,1992.I further certify that
the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 9th day of June,1992.
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 2,1992
PAGE 13 OF 13