HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-11-17 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 17,1992
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction,
Arizona,was held on November 17,1992 at the Apache Junction City Council
Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Damiano called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
INVOCATION
Councilman Perkins gave the Invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilman Ed Cox led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen Present:Mayor Damiano
Vice Mayor Eidson
Councilwoman Barker
Councilman Perkins
Councilwoman Alger
Councilman Coleman
Councilman Cox
Staff Present:City Manager Michael R.Lee
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut
Assistant City Manager George Hoffman
Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel
Director of Public Works Rich Broman
City Engineer Gordon Grandy
Interim Dir.of Development Servs./
Planning Division Manager Jim Nakagawa
Associate Planner Rodney Class -Erickson
ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA
)Councilman Coleman MOVED THAT THE
CONSENT AGENDA BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED;AND
THAT RESOLUTION NO.92-27,ENDORSING THE APPLICATION OF APACHE JUNCTION CLEAN
& BEAUTIFUL,INC.FOR AN ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PUBLIC
EDUCATION GRANT;DESIGNATING THE CITY GRANT ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 1 OF 14
$548.12 TO BE APPLIED TO THE PROJECT;AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
ENTER INTO A GRANT CONTRACT WITH ADEQ,BE APPROVED;AND
THAT AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1992,BE
ACCEPTED;AND
THAT SEPTEMBER 30,1992 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1992 BE APPROVED AS THE PERIOD OF
TIME ALLOWED TO APPLY FOR PUBLIC SAFETY EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVE;AND
THAT THE BID BE AWARDED TO ARNOLD AUTO CENTER FOR A 1992 FORD CROWN VICTORIA
IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,768.18 FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT,BE APPROVED;AND
THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN TO THE CITY MANAGER TO ENGAGE SERVICES OF BILL
STEPHENS TO BRING A LAWSUIT AGAINST ARIZONA WATER COMPANY AND ANY OTHER
APPROPRIATE PARTY FOR DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT AND FOR POSSIBLE DAMAGES DUE TO
INTERFERENCE BY ARIZONA WATER COMPANY IN CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION AND THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
AWARDS,PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Police Explorer Glen Warner was presented with an award for his
outstanding participation in the organization by Public Safety Director Bill
McDaniel and Officer Woody Haywood.
Mayor Damiano presented a proclamation designating December 1992 as
"Food Bank Month"to representatives of the local food bank.
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
None.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Mike Lee gave a financial report on the second quarter of
fiscal year 1991-92 through the end of October.He stated sales tax are on
target with collections for the fiscal year;about State sales tax and revenue
sharing the City could receive an additional $60,000 by the end of the year;
about business licenses there seems to be an increase in fees;that there is
an increase on fees in building permits,therefore the City might receive an
additional $55,000 from that;that Animal Control,Recreation and Library fees
are on target;Magistrate Court fines are on target;highway users revenues
are on target;County one-half cent sales tax is on target.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 2 OF 14
Mr.Lee also stated that expenses exceeded revenues by $804,000 compared
with $516,000 or 35.8% estimated and this time last year expenses exceeded
revenues by $629,000 or 30%;cash flow is bad this time of the.year and it
improves as the winter visitor season gets underway,and by the spring
revenues are over expenditures.He added there is concern about expenditures
being higher this year than in the .last two .years and that according to the
Finance Director that might be attributed to the fact of having three pay
periods in October this year,liability insurance premiums are up by $50,000
over last year,and there were some salary increases this time.
Mr.Lee reported year-to-date revenues are 1.7% --$28,000 less than last year
at this time --and overall expenses are 10% above last year.He stated this
will be monitored closely to be able to make any adjustments soon enough to
prevent any other kind of difficulties.
Mr.Lee reported onithe City auction held on Saturday,November 14th.He
stated the City sold $12,500 worth of surplus equipment and supplies;it was
done -for the first time in conjunction with the,Fire Department who sold
approximately $900 worth of surplus equipment.He thanked those involved who
helped make this a successful auction.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
APPLICATION FOR A LIQUOR LICENSE,SERIES 9,
SUBMITTED BY MRS.SIHAM MOUSSA FOR LUCKY
BOB'S II
)City Clerk Kathy Connelly stated
this is a routine request and Mr.Koza is transferring the license to his
sister.
Mayor Damiano asked if anyone in the
audience wished to speak on this item;there being no one wishing to speak,he
closed the public hearing.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT THE
APPLICATION FOR A SERIES 9 LIQUOR LICENSE SUBMITTED BY MRS.SIHAM MOUSSA FOR
LUCKY BOB'S II,BE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL.
Councilman Perkins SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
APPLICATION FOR A BINGO LICENSE-,CLASS B,
SUBMITTED BY SONS OF THE AMERICAN LEGION
#27;AND
AREGULAR MEETINGOF.THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 3 OF 114
APPLICATION FOR A BINGO LICENSE,CLASS B,
SUBMITTED BY THE BINGO COMMITTEE FOR
V.F.W.POST #9399
)City Clerk Kathy Connelly stated
this is a routine request for a small game bingo license and both the
applicants were informed of this public hearing.
Mr.Bob Hammerel of Sons of the
American Legion #27 spoke on behalf of the organization.
Mr.Val Horsman of VFW Post #9399
spoke on behalf of the organization.
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT
APPLICATION FOR A CLASS B BINGO LICENSE SUBMITTED BY SONS OF THE AMERICAN
LEGION #27 AND VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS POST #9399,BE RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL TO THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BINGO LICENSING AUTHORITY.
Councilman Coleman SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO.844:A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR WINDSONG MOBILE HOME
PARK
)Planning Division Manager Jim
Nakagawa stated this is a request to allow park model or RV units in a mobile
home park but before the presentation applicant Mr.Grundstrom may wish to
address the Council on a request to postpone this matter until March 16,1993.
He mentioned Windsong Mobile Home Park is in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings
at this moment and Mr.Grundstrom indicated he would be in a better position
then to know whether R.T.C.will be giving this Mobile Home Park back to him
or will give the ownership to someone else.
Mr.Ed Grundstrom of Novato
California confirmed the reasons for postponing the case until March 16,1993.
Mayor Damiano asked if there was
anyone in the audience wishing to speak on this item;there being no one
wishing to speak,he closed the public hearing.
Councilman Coleman MOVED THAT THIS
AGENDA ITEM BE POSTPONED UNTIL MARCH 16,1993.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 4 OF 14
Councilwoman Barker asked if this
will not be the second postponement on this item.
Mr.Nakagawa answered it will be the
second time and stated that previously Mr.Grundstrom was away on a business
trip and could not attend the first hearing.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF THE LOCAL
ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION
(HOME RULE)
)City Clerk Kathy Connelly stated
that State law requires the City to have two public hearings prior to taking
official action of putting the Home Rule on the ballot;that tonight is the
first of the two required public hearings and there is no action required on
the part of the Council;and the second public hearing is scheduled for the
meeting of December 1st at 6:00 p.m.at which time the Council will adopt the
resolution placing the item on the ballot.
City Manager Mike Lee stated there
would be a presentation at the December 1st meeting on this issue and asked
Ms.Connelly if she would give a brief summary on this now.
Ms.Connelly explained that in the
1980s there was a measure placed on the ballot Statewide at which time the
voters of Arizona agreed to impose upon cities what was known as the Local
Alternative Expenditure Limitation (home rule option);in doing so,they
allowed the State of Arizona to set a cap or ceiling on the amount of money
that a city could spend and even though a city might take in more money,they
were only allowed to expend a certain amount.She stated this amount is
derived by going through a lengthy formula that is put out by an organization
called the Economics Estimate Commission in conjunction with the State Auditor
General's Office.
Ms.Connelly further explained the
City is right now under the home rule option which voters approved three years
ago;we are required to do it every four years;if not approved,we fall under
the State limitation and even though we collect additional revenues we are
outright prohibited from expending them,even though there might be a need.
Ms.Connelly added Apache Junction
is in a unique situation because the budget year that is used as a base is the
1979-80 budget year which was our first full-time budget year;then we were a
new city and had no idea what our revenue picture was and as a result we are
the one city in the State that is severely restricted by that formula.She
stated our adjoining City of Mesa doesn't have the need to go to the voters
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE '5 OF 14
for this approval because their revenues do not even come up to what their
State limitation is.
Councilwoman Barker asked what
happens to those revenues that are over the limit if we do not have home rule.
Ms.Connelly answered they are
simply put in the bank and •they cannot be spent;unless the law has changed,
we can only spend the interest.
City Manager Mike Lee stated the
preliminary amount for our general fund is estimated at 1.8 million dollars
that would be affected.
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut stated
there are expenditures which are exempt from home rule such as long-term
capital debt expenditures,therefore if we were to spend that excess revenue,
it is possible we may be able to expend it in exempt categories and for exempt
expenditures,but that would be the only exception he would be aware of.
Vice Mayor Edison suggested to
explain some of the bad effects the home rule option could cause the city if
it fails at the polls;that there are many areas that would be looked at;that
if the city had,for instance,almost two million dollars in the bank we could
not spend it,except one or two to three percent interest;that it could
possibly mean substantial cuts in areas of the city like the police department
and parks and recreation.He stated that we need to start letting the public
know that it is to their advantage to look at this very seriously and
hopefully they'll support it.
Mayor Damiano asked if anyone in the
public wished to speak on this item;there being no one wishing to speak,he
closed the public hearing.
ORDINANCE NO.848:AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CITY CODE CHAPTER 6,ANIMALS,SECTION
6-1-4 AND ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 6-9,
KEEPING OF SWINE
)City Clerk Kathy Connelly stated
that at the last meeting the Council provided direction to staff to draft an
ordinance that followed some guidelines as proposed by the local 4-H Club.
She stated this third draft of the ordinance was her initial workings with it
plus the city attorney's workings with it and answers all of those points that
the 4-H people were interested in and even more clearly defines the conditions
under which swine would be allowed in the City.
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut stated
while some terms and conditions on this may not be easy to enforce,for
example trying to find out guidelines of an organization such as 4-H or Future
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 6 OF 14
Farmers of America or some other guidelines that may be established by some
other entity with respect to this,we believe that ultimately we have an
ordinance that works.He explained some of the points in the ordinance.
Mayor Damiano opened the hearing to
the public.
Mrs.Debbie Hill stated she and her
husband will be the leaders for this project and they will monitor the kids
and make sure they follow the rules and guidelines.
There being no one else in the
audience wishing to address the Council,Mayor Damiano closed the public
hearing.
Councilman Perkins MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.848 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE
ORDINANCE BE WAIVED.
Councilman Cox SECONDED THE MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
Ms.Connelly read,"AN ORDINANCE OF
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,AMENDING
THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE CHAPTER 6,ANIMALS,SECTION 6-1-4,SWINE
PROHIBITED,AND.ADDING ANEW ARTICLE 6-9,KEEPING OF SWINE FOR SPECIAL
PROJECTS;REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;AND PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY."
Councilman Perkins MOVED THAT
ORDINANCE NO.848 AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED.
Councilwoman Alger asked the City
Attorney about "educational institution"in B of Section I.She asked him if
it's necessary that it be that broad;that they are talking about the kids,
4-H and FFA,the only two organizations she is aware of that do this project.
City Attorney Glenn Gimbut answered
the only reason he put that in there is that,while the program does not
presently exist in the Apache Junction High School,it is not uncommon for
public schools to also have as vocational education similar marketing
projects.He stated he knows there are schools in the valley which do this
and there is a potential for other valid terminal marketing projects as part
of vocational training or education that he would have a hard time
distinguishing from a public health safety or welfare reason why the city
permits 4-H,but it doesn't permit this particular project.
REGULAR MEETING OFTHE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE '7 OF 14
Councilwoman Alger replied that some
of the definitions do not talk of youth and asked if they could eliminate some
of this and keep it strictly as a youth project;that she did not see this
going to a vocational or technical school for adults but staying with an
educational level for youth.
Mr.Gimbut explained he needed time
to think about it and make those adjustments;that he would like to be careful
on how he addresses that topic so the Council is not creating a special
ordinance for 4-H only and other potential legitimate projects that he can't
distinguish are somehow excluded.
City Clerk Kathleen Connelly
suggested if they could shorten that definition to say it means any public or
private elementary or secondary school that would not take it past the twelve-
grade levels.
Councilwoman Alger agreed on that.
Mr.Gimbut asked if Arizona has some
secondary schools that are specialized technical and vocational schools.
Ms.Connelly answered Arizona might
have some but she did not know of any in Apache Junction.
Councilwoman Barker explained to
Mr.Gimbut the point is that the intention of this specific change in the
ordinances was specifically geared to kids within the school system who are
doing these projects as part of an educational program and when he includes a
business or, professional school,then he is not talking kids.
Councilwoman Alger asked if the
students involved in vocational school are still under our school district.
Councilwoman Barker answered it's a
double district.
Ms.Connelly suggested to say it
means any public or private vocational elementary or secondary schools and
that would leave out references to extension course or university.She stated
educational institution means any public or private elementary or secondary
school,technical or vocational schools.
Councilwoman Barker stated she would
prefer at this point in time to keep the ordinance to the original intent and,
if it comes back in years to come,that suddenly Central Arizona College
expended their campus to include an agricultural department here in Apache
Junction,then they could look at it.
REGULARJEETING OF 7HEHCITYtOUNCIL
NOVEMBER ,17,, 1992:
PAGE -8 OF 14
Councilwoman Alger asked that the
intent for the technical and vocational be understood for high school and
youth,not adults.
Councilwoman Alger asked Mrs.Hill
if the automatic watering is required as part of the project;if that is
something that is necessary for these kids to invest in.
Mrs.Hill answered it is not
necessary but is cleaner;you don't have the mud and the water dripping.
Councilwoman Alger asked Mrs.Hill
if that would be something that normally the 4-H children involved in this
would use,automatic watering;and if having this in the ordinance is not
going to prohibit any children from being involved.
Mrs.Hill answered no,they are not
that expensive.
Councilwoman Alger AMENDED THE
MOTION THAT THE DEFINITION OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION BE THAT IT MEANS ANY
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOL OR A SECONDARY TECHNICAL OR
VOCATIONAL SCHOOL,THIS REFERRING TO SECTION 6-9-1,LETTER B.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
AMENDMENT.
AMENDMENT VOTE:Unanimous.
The amendment passed.
MAIN VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
APACHE JUNCTION GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TASK
FORCE
)Planning Division Manager Jim
Nakagawa stated the City Council wanted to have a citizen task force formed in
order for them to begin work on a new General Plan update.He explained some
of the problems encountered in advertising in a timely manner for talent bank
applications and that he has been contacted by three people indicating an
interest in serving but he has not seen any applications come in.
Mr.Nakagawa requested that Council
postpone this until such a time that sufficient number of applications are
received.He also asked the Council to determine how many people they would
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 9 OF 14
like to have on the task force and whether or not they wish to restrict
membership to just city residents or perhaps allow some county residents to
serve on the task force as well.
Mr. Nakagawa introduced to the
Council new Associate Planner Rodney Class -Erickson.
Councilman Perkins stated the
Council should allow outside residents from the county area.
Councilwoman Alger replied that in
light of the general plan the county has recently gone through, what we do
with our General Plan no longer will affect any of the county areas; we don't
have any of the extra territorial involvement that we had before because of
their own comprehensive plan and planning and zoning. She stated it would be
better to keep it all city residents for this General Plan because the
planning area that we are going to be involved with is within the city limits.
Councilwoman Barker replied that in
order to preserve some continuity between the County and the City, she too
would like to see a couple of county people on the task force; although we may
not have a legal impact on areas outside the city boundaries because where our
boundary ceases the outside area starts, so we are abutting one another and in
order to retain that continuity it is important to have outside people.
Councilwoman Alger replied maybe it
would be beneficial that our General Plan changes normally would have to be
submitted to Pinal County as a courtesy and review for any discrepancies they
would see between the two, and that would take care of that.
Councilwoman Barker asked if it
would not be better to have that done during the process rather than having to
go through a double process; if they gave some input during our process when
it went to them they would not have to start going through it again; that it
might save some time to have input from outside.
Mayor Damiano suggested to have
input from within the three-mile limit or zone of influence.
Councilman Perkins stated one of the
reasons why he supports outside input and why it would be beneficial is that
many people who own land within the city limits or have businesses here or
have an interest within the city limits, live just outside the city limits or
within that three-mile limitation. He further explained why he considered it
unfair to exclude them from having an input in the General Plan update.
Councilwoman Alger changed her
position on not having residents from outside the city on the task force.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17, 1992
PAGE 10 OF 14
The Council discussed the number of
members to be appointed to the task force and decided it would be seven
members with two of them being from outside the city limits.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT THE
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TASK FORCE BE A SEVEN -MEMBER COMMITTEE,TWO OF WHICH WILL
BE FROM THE ZONE OF INFLUENCE AND FIVE FROM WITHIN THE CITY.
Councilwoman Alger SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
AWARD OF BID FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR
IRONWOOD CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER,
PROJECT NO.ENG 92-05
)City Engineer Gordon Grandy
stated that in our efforts to attract such a shopping center the City has
offered some incentives to the developer and release some of his financial
burden;an incentive was the offsite improvements.He stated that with the
assistance of Economic Development Manager John Schoeph,the City has obtained
a State grant of $71,010.00 towards funding these improvements.He briefed
the Council on the results of the bid opening on November 12th and explained
there were some situations regarding the developer and the property which
should prevent an award tonight.He stated that one situation is about the
right-of-way which was a condition of the zoning approval,that the additional
right-of-way on Ironwood Drive be dedicated to the City;that the developer
has not had enough time to accomplish that transaction and therefore his
recommendation tonight is that the award be postponed until the December 1st
meeting.
Councilman Coleman asked if the
recommended winner of the bid would hold it open.
Mr.Grandy answered yes,that part
of the conditions of receiving bids by the City is that all of the bids will
remain enforced for thirty days,so in order for all the bids to expire we
have until December 12th to take action;and then the City could allow another
ten or eleven days for the developers,if the Council wanted to call for a
special meeting in an effort to keep enforced the bids and award to the low
bidders.
Councilwoman Barker MOVED THAT WE
POSTPONE THE AWARDING OF THE BID UNTIL THE DECEMBER 1ST COUNCIL MEETING.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 11 OF 14
Councilwoman Alger SECONDED THE
MOTION.
VOTE:Unanimous.
The motion carried.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF ON PROPOSED LEGISLATION OR ACTIONS
None.
SELECTION OF MEETING DATES,TIMES,LOCATIONS,AND PURPOSES
Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT AN
EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M.ON MONDAY,NOVEMBER 30,1992 IN THE
CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM;AND
THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD AT 6:00 P.M.ON TUESDAY,DECEMBER 1,1992 IN
THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM;AND
THAT A SECOND REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING AND SPECIAL MEETING SON CONTINUATION OF
LOCAL ALTERNATIVE EXPENDITURE LIMITATION (HOME RULE OPTION)BE HELD AT 6:00
P.M.ON TUESDAY,DECEMBER 1,1992.
Councilwoman Barker SECONDED THE
MOTION.
Councilwoman Alger was opposed to
the 6:00 p.m.time for the special meeting on Tuesday,December 1,1992.She
commented that the Council regular meetings are at seven o'clock and the time
to talk about home rule should be seven o'clock.She added the Council has
had special meetings at seven o'clock previously and in conjunction with
Council meetings.
Councilman Coleman replied the
meeting and time have already been advertised.
Councilwoman Alger suggested to
readvertise it.
City Clerk Kathy Connelly replied we
would not have the statutory time to do the advertising and the Council would
truly have to have a special meeting on a separate date in order to fulfill
the requirements;that• another advertisement might void tonight's public
hearing on the home rule option;and the State law is very specific about how
we do things on this area.
City Manager Mike Lee suggested to
take comments under his advice in the future for setting up meetings.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 12OF 14'
VOTE:In favor:Vice Mayor Eidson,Councilman Coleman,Councilman Cox,
Councilman Perkins,Councilwoman Barker,Mayor Damiano.
Opposed:Councilwoman Alger.
The motion carried.
INFORMATION AND REPORTS
Councilwoman Barker commended the police department on their new
neighborhood program about having Officer Haywood in her neighborhood talking
to her son and other children and giving them straight and real information;
that she knows he is going to be around and this will be happening in other
neighborhoods in Apache Junction.
ADJOURNMENT
)Mayor Damian()adjourned the
meeting at 8:10 p.m.
Consent Agenda Items are as follows:
1.Acceptance of Agenda.
2.Acceptance of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 20,1992.
3.Acceptance of the Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 26,1992.
4.Approval of Resolution No.92-27,designating City grant allocation of
$548.12 for Apache Junction Clean and Beautiful,Inc.grant application
to Arizona Dept.of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)to publish information
on litter control and solid waste reduction.
5.Acceptance of Audited Financial Statements as of June 30,1992.
6.Approval of establishment of period of time allowed to apply for Public
Safety Early Retirement Incentive.
7.Approval of Bid Award to Arnold Auto Center for a 1992 Ford for the
police department.
8.Approval to engage services of Bill Stephens to bring a lawsuit against
Arizona Water Company for declaratory judgement and for possible damages
due to interference by Arizona Water Company in contract between the
City of Apache Junction and the Central Arizona Water Conservation
District.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 13 -OF 14
ACCEPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER ,1992,BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER ,1992.
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
THOMAS DAM IANO
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the
minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache
Junction,Arizona,held on the 17th day of November,1992.I further certify
that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this 23rd day of November,1992.
-1LeA
KATHLEEN CONNELLY
City Clerk
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER 17,1992
PAGE 14 OF 14