Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-11-07 City Council Regular MinutesCITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 7,1989 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona,was held on November 7,1989,at the Apache Junction City Council Chambers pursuant to the notice required by law. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bluntschly called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. INVOCATION Councilman Eidson gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Mayor Damiano led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmen Present: Staff Present: Others Present: Councilman Vehon Councilwoman Barker Councilman Cox Councilman Eidson Councilwoman Alger Vice Mayor Damiano Mayor Bluntschly Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly City Attorney David Alexander Deputy City Clerk Lori Zmayefski Director of Public Works Rich Broman Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel Assistant to the City Manager George Hoffman Director of Community Services Jeff Bell Assistant Planner Rudy Esquivas Associate Planner/Deputy Director Jim Nakagawa Economic Development Specialist John Schoeph Controller Keith Lewis Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson Ms Sandie Smith 3575 N.Prospector Rd. Apache Junction,Arizona REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 1 Mr.Charles Modde 1930 W.Apache Trail Apache Junction,Arizona Mr.Dennis McCuen 1520 W.Tepee Apache Junction,Arizona Ms Ellen Durkin 5435 E.12th Avenue Apache Junction,Arizona Mr.Mike Sleeseman 1863 S.Buena Vista Apache Junction,Arizona Father Charles Maloney 300 E.16th Avenue Apache Junction,Arizona Mr.Tom Leigh 460 N.Boyd Apache Junction,Arizona Ms Rosemarie Doth 6260 E.12th Avenue Apache Junction,Arizona Ms Ilene Taylor 1617 S.Cortez Apache Junction,Arizona Mr.Gary Higgins 100 W.Highway 60 Apache Junction,Arizona Mr.Lou Schaeffer 3636 N.Central Phoenix,AZ Mr.Dan Powell Arizona Department of Transportation ACCEPTANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA )Vice Mayor Damiano MOVED THAT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NOS.1-10 BE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED,EXCEPT THAT THE REGULAR MEETING AGENDA BE AMENDED BY MOVING ITEM NOS.16-7 AND 16-8 TO THE FIRST AND SECOND ITEM AFTER THE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT,AND ALSO MOVE ITEMS 13 AND 14 BEFORE 11 AND 12; REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 2 AND THAT AUTHORIZATION BE GIVEN THE ENGINEERING DIVISION,THROUGH THE ACTING CITY MANAGER,TO COORDINATE WITH SALT RIVER PROJECT (OR CITY INSTALLATION)FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CITY COMPLEX PARKING LOT LIGHTS -POSTPONE THIS ITEM; AND THAT THE BID FOR THE RENOVATION AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL FIELDS BE AWARDED TO RAY STEVENS PAVING COMPANY,IN THE AMOUNT OF $115,040.00. I FURTHER MOVE THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MICHAEL ELLIOT FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET,AND THAT ERNEST BAKER BE APPOINTED TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION,SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30,1992; AND THAT MR.ROBERT BROWN BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, PURSUANT TO THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE,SECTION 11-1-2,AND FURTHER,THAT THOMAS KELLEY-DEVANEY BE APPOINTED TO THE VACANCY CREATED BY THE REMOVAL,SAID TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 30,1991; AND THAT THE AMENDMENT TO THE TAX RATE BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 21,1989; AND THAT PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO.89-31,ACKNOWLEDGING THE REQUEST OF THE APACHE JUNCTION FIRE DISTRICT AND ENDORSING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL STATE LAND LOCATED IN SECTIONS 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,10,11 AND 13 OF TOWNSHIP ONE SOUTH,RANGE EIGHT EAST,GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN INTO THE APACHE JUNCTION FIRE DISTRICT,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED; AND THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A BOARD OF APPEALS AND BOARD OF ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS,BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 21,1989; AND THAT THE FIRM SELECTED FOR BOND COUNSEL BE O'CONNOR CAVANAUGH,AND THAT THE FIRM SELECTED AS FINANCIAL ADVISORS BE PEACOCK/HISLOP FOR THE SEWER ISSUE BOND ELECTION SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 30,1990. Councilman Eidson seconded the motion. Councilwoman Alger asked why the complex parking lot lighting is being postponed? Vice Mayor Damiano explained that Councilman Cox and himself looked at the current lighting,and stated that i t is sufficient,and shouldn't cost this much to improve. Councilwoman Barker asked Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel if,from a health and safety point of view,the proposal described by Vice Mayor Damiano would be adequate lighting? Vice Mayor Damiano clarified that there would be two additional lights at the northeast corner of the parking lot, and one more facing the Chamber of Commerce parking lot. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 3 Councilwoman Alger commented that this means five new lights instead of seven. Councilman Cox pointed out that this proposal also eliminates some of the poles by placing two lights on one pole, which is a large saving. Councilman Vehon stated that i f the City is going to do this,i t should be done adequately,and that placing two lights on one pole would still only shine so far. Vice Mayor Damiano again outlined the proposal. Councilwoman Alger stated that this lighting situation is important,considering the amount of people using the facilities,especially the Handicapped Center.Councilwoman Alger added that all of the lights need to be put in as the expense is not that great in comparison to the expense should someone be injured. Vice Mayor Damiano reiterated that there is ample lighting in those areas. Mayor Bluntschly stated that as there seems to be concern on both sides of the issue,this should be postponed to allow staff time to evaluate Vice Mayor Damiano's proposal. VOTE:In Favor:Councilman Cox (except for abstaining on Item No.8), Councilman Eidson,Councilwoman Barker,Vice Mayor Damiano, Mayor Bluntschly Opposed:Councilwoman Alger,Councilman Vehon The motion carried. Introduction of Distinguished Visitors and Guests Mayor Bluntschly welcomed everyone to the meeting,acknowledging representatives from the Chamber of Commerce,School Board,and former councilmembers. AWARDS,PRESENTATIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Bluntschly presented Certificates of Attendance for a Risk Management Workshop,to the following:Director of Community Services Jeff Bell, Recreation Coordinator Chuck Baker,Dunlop Rosado,Viola Kenney,Operations Supervisor Doug Dobson,Controller Keith Lewis. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 4 Mayor Bluntschly called upon the Deputy City Clerk Lori Zmayefski to read the Proclamation for "Veterans Remembrance Month",and presented i t to a representative. Mayor Bluntschly called upon Deputy City Clerk Lori Zmayefski to read the Proclamation for "Hunger Hurts Week",and presented i t to the representative from Reach Out Food Bank. Mayor Bluntschly also explained that Director of Community Services Jeff Bell is working on a program to help needy families to assist the Salvation Army,the City,and Reach Out Food Bank particularly during the holiday season. Councilman Vehon stated that upon attending the Annual Banquet for Superstition Mountain Mental Health Center,the Health Center awarded the City with a nice plaque for efforts and assistance. CALL TO THE PUBLIC Mayor Bluntschly explained that as the Swap Meet Regulations agenda item is not a public hearing,those wishing to speak will address the Council at this time. Ms Sandie Smith,3575 N.Prospector Rd.,Apache Junction,also business owner in Apache Junction,asked that when considering the Park n'Swap agenda item,would the Council rely heavily upon the Committee recommendation. Mr.Charles Modde,1930 W.Apache Trail,Apache Junction,addressed the Council stating that the business license fee for vendors at the flea market is too much. Mr.Dennis McCuen,1520 W.Tepee St.,Apache Junction,stated that the City has not acted fairly and has a set of double standards for the large business individual. Ms Ellen Durkin,5435 E.12th Avenue,Apache Junction,Committee member and vendor,addressed the Council opposing many of the regulations imposed on swap meet vendors. Mr.Mike Sleeseman,1863 S.Buena Vista,Apache Junction,Committee member, stated that the Committee reviewed a broad area of licensing regulations connected with the swap meet,and further stated that compromises were found but that some councilmembers apparently do not believe in Committee process. Father Charles Maloney,300 E.16th Avenue,Apache Junction,representing St.George's Catholic Church,addressed the Council opposing the requirement for a hood on the church kitchen dishwasher,and requested that the church be able to obtain a waiver. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 5 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly reported that November 11th the local Veterans in conjunction with the City,are sponsoring a parade, beginning at 10:00 a.m.from Ironwood to Idaho Road,and there will be ceremonies at approximately 11:00 a.m.,along with an Apache Helicopter on display in the parking lot.Ms Connelly asked for support and involvement in the upcoming food drive,and stated that credit should be given Mayor Bluntschly and Director of Community Services Jeff Bell for working hard and pursuing this project,and finally,that the City will have a Clean-up Week on December 4th through December 8th,with different areas scheduled for clean-up at different times during the week. 7.DIRECTION TO STAFF TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MECHANICAL CODE PERTAINING TO DISHWASHER HOODS. Vice Mayor Damiano referred to Father Maloney's comments,and stated that Councilman Cox and himself have checked with Pinal County on "hood"requirements for dishwashers,and were told by Mr.Teegarten that Pinal County has no jurisdiction over dishwashers in non- commercial kitchens.Vice Mayor Damiano further stated that there should be an amendment to the Uniform Mechanical Code. Vice Mayor Damiano MOVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE REGULATIONS AS FOLLOWS: INSTILL IN SECTION 2003(a)"A HOOD NOT REQUIRED FOR A LOW TEMPERATURE DISHWASHER IN A NON-COMMERCIAL KITCHEN OR ESTABLISHMENT. Councilman Cox seconded the motion. Vice Mayor Damiano further commented that a hood should not be required in this area because of the low dew point, which encourages condensation. Mayor Bluntschly stated that i f a hood is not to be required for low -temperature,non-commercial,this should be specified in the motion,but i f there are steam tables they may still be required. Vice Mayor Damiano stated that in the Service,he hardly ever saw steam escaping from a steam tables or dishwashers, so there doesn't seem to be any harm to the public. Councilwoman Barker asked what would the motion be with Mayor Bluntschly's remarks? Vice Mayor Damiano reiterated the motion as follows:INSTILL IN SECTION 2003(a)"A HOOD NOT REQUIRED FOR A LOW -TEMPERATURE DISHWASHER IN A NON-COMMERCIAL KITCHEN OR ESTABLISHMENT. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 6 Councilwoman Alger asked i f i t wouldn't be easier and faster to do a resolution of waiver based on the Pinal County Sanitary Code? City Attorney David Alexander stated that this is not advised,as i t should apply to everyone,and the Council would have numerous requests to waive other Code requirements also making the Council the Building Department,and further,there is no authority on the Council's part to do something like this. Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly further stated that since the Mechanical Code was adopted by Ordinance,a change would have to be made by ordinance. Councilwoman Alger asked what the ramifications of this change will be? Mr.Alexander stated that i f direction is followed,and a steam table is in the kitchen,the same problem will occur. Councilman Cox stated that as a professional chef,he never used a steam table and a dishwasher at the same time,so there should not be a conflict. Councilman Vehon expressed concern in making this change,as even though the kitchen may be non-commercial i t is still a commercial dishwasher. VOTE:In Favor:Councilwoman Alger,Councilman Cox,Councilman Eidson, Councilwoman Barker,Vice Mayor Damiano,Mayor Bluntschly Opposed:Councilman Vehon The motion carried. Mayor Bluntschly recessed the meeting. Mayor Bluntschly reconvened the meeting at 8:13 p.m. 8.SPECIFIC DIRECTION FOR AMENDMENTS TO BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS REGARDING SWAP MEET VENDORS. Mayor Bluntschly called on the Chairman of the Swap Meet Review Committee Councilman Vehon. Councilman Vehon stated that no matter what the Council does with these license requirements,i t will probably not fit everyone. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 7 Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT THE ACTING CITY MANAGER BE GIVEN DIRECTION TO PROCEED WITH AN ORDINANCE TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 5,1989,IN ORDER TO AMEND THE BUSINESS LICENSE REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SWAP MEET VENDORS,AN POTENTIALLY OTHER PARTS OF THE ORDINANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS: 1.THAT THE DEFINITION PORTION OF THE ORDINANCE BE CHANGED AND THAT A NEW DEFINITION BE PUT IN FOR THE DEFINITION OF A SWAP MEET CONTRACT VENDOR, MEANING ANY LICENSED VENDOR WHO HAS CONTRACTED WITH THE SWAP MEET PROPRIETOR TO LEASE IDENTIFIED SPACES FOR AN ENTIRE SEASON FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A SALE AT A SWAP MEET,AND THAT AN ADDITIONAL DEFINITION BE PUT IN THAT A SWAP MEET LICENSE VENDOR IS ANY LICENSED PERSON LOCATED ON THE PREMISES OF A SWAP MEET FOR THE PURPOSE OF CAUSING A SALE AT A SWAP MEET,AND THAT THIS PERSON IS NOT A SWAP MEET CONTRACT VENDOR. 3.THAT THE ACTING CITY MANAGER BRING BACK ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT THEY DEEM NECESSARY IN ORDER CHANGE THE ORDINANCE REGARDING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SWAP MEET PROPRIETOR. 4.THAT THE SWAP MEET CONTRACT VENDORS FILE THEIR GROSS SALES REPORTS ON A MONTHLY BASIS,WITH EACH REPORTING TO OCCUR NO LATER THAN THE SIXTH DAY FOLLOWING THE END OF EACH MONTH. 5.THAT ALL SWAP MEET LICENSED VENDORS AND OTHERS WHO ARE NOT SWAP MEET CONTRACT VENDORS FILE THEIR GROSS SALES REPORTS ON A WEEKLY BASIS WITH SUCH FILING TO OCCUR NO LATER THAN THE TUESDAY FOLLOWING EACH WEEKEND OF SALES NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M. 6.THAT THE DAILY SPACE RENTAL FEE BE RAISED FROM THE CURRENT 50(f PER SPACE PER DAY TO A $1.00 PER SPACE PER DAY,FOR CASUAL AND NON -LICENSED VENDORS ONLY. 7.THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAKE CHANGES TO THE APPROPRIATE SECTIONS OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING SPECIAL EVENT LICENSES AND THAT THESE CHANGES BE IM PLEMENTED PRIOR TO LOST DUTCHMAN DAYS,AND THAT THEY BE A $10.00 FEE FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE DAYS,NO MORE THAN THREE TIMES PER YEAR. 8.THAT WE DRAFT AN ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION HOLDING A SPECIAL EVENT TO HAVE THE BUSINESSES PARTICIPATING IN THAT SPECIAL EVENT BE EXEMPT FROM THE LICENSE REQUIREMENTS,AND TO BE USED UNDER THAT NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION. motion. profit portion be repeated. Councilwoman Alger seconded the Mayor Bluntschly asked that the non- Councilman Vehon reiterated:THAT THE BUSINESS LICENSE FEE BE WAIVED FOR THOSE VENDORS PARTICIPATING IN A SPECIAL EVENT,BEING SPONSORED BY A NON-PROFIT 501(C)ORGANIZATION,AND THAT THOSE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 8 ORGANIZATION BE REQUIRED INSTEAD,TO BE REGISTERED WITH THE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION. Councilwoman Alger amended the motion THAT FOR A SPECIAL EVENT THAT BENEFITS THE COMMUNITY,SPONSORED BY A 501(C)ORGANIZATION,PARTICIPATING BUSINESSES IN THAT PARTICULAR EVENT,WILL BE BUSINESS LICENSE FEE EXEMPT,BUT WILL STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS BUT WILL BE FEE EXEMPT. Councilman Vehon commented that this is different from the special events not sponsored by a non-profit organization, where there is a $10.00 fee for three consecutive days,as there may be special events not sponsored by non-profit organizations. Councilman Vehon seconded the amendment. Councilman Eidson stated that the weekly sales report going to a monthly is one point of compromise,and there were many compromises in order to get everyone on the Committee together,even though his feeling is that the forms are a double standard,and also pointed out things should be imposed on a whole group not just a portion of a group. Councilwoman Barker stated that she appreciates the efforts of the Committee,however,that she has a concern in dividing weekly and monthly sales reports as i t is inequitable,and also the City does not have the staff to accomplish a monthly report versus a weekly report.Councilwoman Barker stated that after observing staff inputting this information into the computer,she concluded that this change would multiply the work of this staff person who is also serving the rest of the community,not only park n'swap,and all of the community should be considered. Councilman Eidson stated that i f staff can prove that this form does anything other than put a law on the books, he would approve of it,but staff has not been able to do this so far. Councilwoman Alger informed the Council that staff has become aware that the State has begun audit processes upon a vendor at park n'swap due to the gross sales reports that the City supplies them,so this has stopped some of the non-payment of sales tax. Councilwoman Alger addressed the vendors,stating that Elaine Sammons took time to go out to park n'swap to hold meetings to show them how to fill out these forms,so as to begin developing the process to collect our own sales tax and this is the first step.Councilwoman Alger also stated that the vendors do not appear to realize the requirements of a regular business in the community,who have twelve requirements of which only four are required of park n'swap vendors. Councilman Vehon stated that this is not a perfect amendment to the regulations,but i t is a step in trying to REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 9 encourage people to go to park n'swap,and to do business in town,and also may force the City to look at the current computer system and make changes,as i t may be kind of antiquated. Mayor Bluntschly stated that the type of definition set up for vendors concerns him,as i t seems to be taylored for the benefit of American Park N'Swap,and may i t cause problems for the City in the future,and having different types of vendors also is developing a problem of aligning one group of vendors against another group of vendors.Mayor Bluntschly also expressed concern with raising the space fee from 50t to $1.00. VOTE (on the amendment):Unanimous VOTE (on the motion as amended):Unanimous The motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.697,INSTALLATION OF FOUR-WAY STOP AT GOLDFIELD AND BROADWAY (With the Emergency Clause) )Director of Public Works Rich Broman explained that a request was received from the Superintendent of Schools to install a four-way stop at Goldfield and Broadway,and upon performing a study i t was concluded that the 85%exceed the 45mph speed limit and also some sight restrictions exist,all posing a safety hazard to school children.Mr.Broman stated that the warrants for a four-way stop were not met,but due to extenuating circumstances,this stop sign is recommended by staff and Pinal County concurs. Mayor Bluntschly opened the hearing to the public,and asked i f there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the ordinance? Mr.Tom Leigh,460 N.Boyd,Apache Junction,resident in this area,and stated that due to the down -hill grade i t is a dangerous intersection. Ms Rosemarie Doth,6260 E.12th Avenue,Apache Junction,also addressed the Council in favor of the ordinance, stating that a four-way stop is necessary,but that a sign notifying people of the change in traffic signal would also be necessary. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 10 There being no one else wishing to address the Council,Mayor Bluntschly closed the hearing to the public. Vice Mayor Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.697,BE READ BY TITLE ONLY WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE,AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. Councilman Cox seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. Deputy City Clerk Lori Zmayefski read as follows: ORDINANCE NO.697,AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS FOR STOP SIGNS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES;AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Vice Mayor Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.697,AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman Cox seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. Mayor Bluntschly asked how soon those stop signs would be installed. Mr.Broman replied that i f they are in stock,one can be installed tomorrow,but the other would have to wait for Pinal County to install which may be a couple of weeks. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.699,ESTABLISHING SCHOOL CROSSING AT FOUR PEAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ) )Mayor Bluntschly asked i f there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the ordinance?There being no one wishing to address the Council,Mayor Bluntschly closed the hearing to the public. Vice Mayor Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.699,BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 11 Councilman Cox seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. Deputy City Clerk Lori Zmayefski read as follows: ORDINANCE NO.699,AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,ESTABLISHING A SCHOOL CROSSING AT FOUR PEAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES. Vice Mayor Damiano MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.699,AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Councilman 'Cox seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.693, REORGANIZATION (Postponed Item) )Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that this item has been postponed twice,and i t has been discussed for about two years,and that this ordinance establishes a City Engineer Department,and a Department of Development Services with services that are aimed to assist the public,from rezoning to building an addition to a house,to bringing in a major development.Ms Connelly stated that Councilmembers have indicated various changes they wish to be made to the ordinance as originally written,and that one of those is instead of allocating the title of Division head for Housing and Grants and Economic Development,that they be titled as functions or as sections. Councilman Eidson asked i f i t would be possible to proceed with the Engineering portion of the ordinance,without proceeding with the remainder until a City Manager is on board,to allow him to be part of the reorganization itself? Ms Connelly replied that this is possible,however,the application process has been advertised and closed for the Director of Development Services,and that this would delay the hiring for that position,which is imposing a burden on staff currently doing a multitude of duties as well as several hundred dollars in advertising already spent. Councilman Eidson suggested hiring a City Engineer under the present system,and than after a City Manager is hired proceed with the reorganization. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 12 Ms Connelly explained that this position was advertised as a department head position,which essentially voids the recruitment process which was based upon council direction. Vice Mayor Damiano asked how can this position have been advertised,when a department does not yet exist? Ms Connelly replied that because the Council gave direction to do so. Vice Mayor Damiano replied that he doesn't recall doing that. Councilman Vehon stated that the only major change the staff has not responded to was the suggestion by Councilwoman Alger,on changing the way rezoning and ordinance changes is currently being done. Assistant to the City Manager George Hoffman stated that the proposal was to place rezoning process under the jurisdiction of the Zoning Administrator,and that this decision should be left up to the City Manager after that person is hired,as this is an administrative decision.Mr.Hoffman added that these particulars could be left out of the ordinance,with all of those administrative decisions to be made by the City Manager later,as Council can either make policy decisions or administrative decisions. Councilwoman Alger explained that the ordinance currently states that those duties are the duties of the Zoning Administrator,and what difference would i t make i f the ordinance stays the same with the duties continuing under the Development Services Department. Mr.Hoffman encouraged Councilwoman Alger not to feel bound by what is currently in the ordinance,but to make the changes the Council wishes. Councilwoman Alger stated that this is what she wants. Councilman Cox stated that the City Manager,after hired,should make those decisions but to proceed with hiring a City Engineer. Councilwoman Alger pointed out that Mr.Hoffman is needed in the job for which he was hired especially with the upcoming sewer issue,so the Director of Development Services is needed now,and that these changes can be made in the ordinance at a later time. Mayor Bluntschly stated that i f the Council doesn't act on this now and waits for a City Manager,i t may be four to eight months before this reorganization is accomplished. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 13 Mr.Hoffman asked i f the City Manager couldn't proceed with screening of applicants,and he would provide an ordinance by tomorrow which would include an overall draft of the Code that would reflect the entire Development Services Department that would include the basic functions. Ms Connelly asked the City Attorney i f the Council adopts as presented,with duties outlined under the Zoning Administrator that the Planning Department is currently performing,is that division in a compromising situation. Mr.Alexander replied that i t would be,and the Council must decide whether or not to make policy or administrative decisions,and these are administrative decisions,which places the Acting City Manager,the new City Manager and the new Planning Direction in a real position. Councilman Eidson commented that to pass something with the intent to change i t later,should not be done,as i t could take a long time to change the Code. Councilwoman Alger replied that the new director may wish i t to remain the way i t is. Councilman Eidson added that he is still against forming a separate department of City Engineer. to the public. Mayor Bluntschly opened the hearing Ms Ilene Taylor,1617 S.Cortez, Apache Junction,addressed the Council representing the Economic Opportunities Action Team and in opposition to placing the Economic Development under the Development Services Department,stating that this may compromise projects under this department,and also requesting that the decision be delayed until a new City Manager is hired. Ms Taylor also requested a joint work session between the Economic Opportunities Action Team and the City Council. Mr.Gary Higgins,100 W.Highway 60, Apache Junction,business owner,requested that this decision wait for a new City Manager,and also that the Council should let management make the administrative decisions. There being no one else wishing to speak,Mayor Bluntschly closed the hearing to the public. Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.693 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY,AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 14 Councilman Vehon seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. Deputy City Clerk Lori Zmayefski read as follows: ORDINANCE NO.693,AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION CITY CODE,CHAPTER 3,ADMINISTRATION,ARTICLE 3-5,DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,AND ARTICLE 3-9,DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING;REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.693,AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: UNDER SECTION 3-9-3 (c)THAT THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ACT AS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ASSISTED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION; SECTION 3-9-5 (a)(1a),"ASSIST THE"REPLACE "ACTING AS",AND ALSO IN (a)(lc); SECTION 3-9-6 REPLACE THE WORD "DIVISION"WITH THE WORD "FUNCTION"IN THE TITLE AND IN (a.1.),AND MAKE THE SAME CHANGE IN SECTION 3-9-7 IN THE TITLE IN (a)AND IN (a.1.); SECTION 3-9-4,(e.1.),CHANGE "DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS"TO "DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR"; SECTION 3-9-4 (f.1.,2.,and 3.),BE PLACED UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIVISION OF PLANNING; SECTION 3-9-1 (b.),ADD TO THE END OF THAT PARAGRAPH,"SUBJECT TO RATIFICATION BY THE COUNCIL". Councilman Vehon seconded the motion. Councilman Vehon asked i f the functions under Section 3-9-4 f .1.,2.,and 3.,aren't already listed under the Planning Department? Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that no,the Planning Department is doing those functions,but those were never reflected in the Code. Vice Mayor Damiano pointed out that Article 12,Department of Engineering is not reflected in the title of the ordinance. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 15 Ms Connelly stated that this is an oversight. Councilwoman Alger amended the motion THAT ARTICLE 12,DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING BE INCLUDED TO THE TITLE OF ORDINANCE NO.693. Councilman Vehon seconded the amendment. VOTE (on the amendment): In Favor:Councilwoman Alger,Councilman Cox,Councilman Vehon, Councilwoman Barker,Mayor Bluntschly Opposed:Councilman Eidson,Vice Mayor Damiano VOTE (on the motion as amended): In Favor:Councilwoman Barker,Councilwoman Alger,Councilman Cox, Councilman Vehon,Mayor Bluntschly Opposed:Councilman Eidson,Vice Mayor Damiano The motion carried as amended. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.695,COUNCIL- INITIATED,PZ-13-89 ) )Mayor Bluntschly stated that this is a rezoning of a 10 acre parcel,lcoated at the northwest corner of Winchester Road,and Broadway Avenue,from C-4/PD Heavy Commercial by Planned Development from Gr General Rural. Assistant Planner Rudy Esquivas stated that this is a Council -initiated rezoning of two five acre parcels,and that in 1982 this property plus two adjacent parcels were rezoned to CB -2,and in 1985 when the new Zoning Ordinance and Zoning District Map,in which the east 10 acres of the subject property were inadvertently rezoned back to GR because of a map drawing error.Mr.Esquivas further stated that the applicant is requesting that the City correct the mapping error and rezone the east 10 acres of the property back to an equivalent of CB -2 as that is no longer a current zoning designation in Apache Junction,and stated that staff recommended approval with stipulations of rights -of -way dedication which the applicants refused,and that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval without that stipulation. Mr.Esquivas stated that after negotiation between the attorneys,the applicants have agreed to C-4/PD zoning REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 16 which means that should they develop,the City may require dedications at the time of development,and that staff recommends approval of this zoning. Councilman Vehon asked i f when this property is developed,the only dedications that may be required will be those for the 10 acre portion that is being rezoned,and not the remainder of the property. Mr.Esquivas replied that this is correct,although the City may request the other dedications. Mayor Bluntschly asked i f there was anyone who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the ordinance? Mr.Lou Schaeffer,3636 N.Central, Phoenix,Attorney for the applicants,stated that they seek for the return of the zoning to the property and have compromised for the PD zoning. Mayor Bluntschly stated that something was taken away,and something should be given back. Mr.Schaeffer stated that his clients are a group from Hong Kong,and i t is their cultural bias to be cooperative,and they felt i t would be improper for the City to correct their mistake and to ask for something in return,but are willing to do whatever is required upon the development of the property,and added that at that time they probably will also give dedications for the adjoining 10 acres. Councilman Vehon asked i f the applicants feel that the two adjoining properties with different zonings will cause a problem at the time of developemnt? Mr.Schaeffer replied that no i t shouldn't be as they are actually the same type of zoning. There being no one else wishing to speak,Mayor Bluntschly closed the hearing to the public. Councilman Vehon stated that he has mixed feelings on this,as the error was the City's,the mistake should be corrected but he doesn't agree with the process. City Attorney David Alexander explained that what occured was that the City lost the Zoning Ordinance,and that anything going on as of March 5,1985,was no.k."and hopefully everyone who was affected by that Zoning Ordinance was given public notice,but that prior to this enactment there was no zoning on this property. Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.695 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY,AND THE READING OF THE ENTIRE ORDINANCE BE WAIVED. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 17 Vice Mayor Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. Deputy City Clerk Lori Zmayefski read as follows: ORDINANCE NO.695,AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,AMENDING THE APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,ZONING ORDINANCE,BY AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA,CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION IN REZONING CASE PZ-13-89 FROM GR GENERAL RURAL TO C-4/PD (HEAVY COMMERCIAL/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT);REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT ORDINANCE NO.695,AS READ BY THE CITY CLERK,BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Vice Mayor Damiano seconded the motion. Mayor Bluntschly stated that i t is understandable what the City is trying to accomplish by this,but he cannot in good conscience support this for the reasons as previously stated. VOTE:In Favor:Councilman Vehon,Councilwoman Barker,Councilwoman Alger, Councilman Eidson,Councilman Cox,Vice Mayor Damian() Opposed:Mayor Bluntschly The motion carried. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS APPROVAL OF INITIAL DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT FOR ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT S-214-309, IDAHO ROAD AND SCENIC REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 18 )Mr.Dan Powell,representative of Arizona Department of Transportation,stated that ADOT understands the concerns expressed by Council of the Design for Idaho Road and Scenic and wishes to hold a public hearing on the intersection alternatives in order to solicit input from the public,therefore,would like this postponed until the hearing and another presentation to the City Council. Councilman Vehon asked when this should come back to the Council? Mr.Powell replied that the hearing is tentatively scheduled for December 5th,or early in December,and i t will stay open for 30 days for public comment,so can come back to the Council in early February. Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT THE DESIGN CONCEPT REPORT FOR ADOT PROJECT S-214-309,BE POSTPONED UNTIL THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6,1990. Councilwoman Barker seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF ON PROPOSED CITY LEGISLATION OR ACTIONS: 1.DIRECTION TO DRAFT ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS LICENSE REVIEW REGULATION COMMITTEE Councilman Vehon asked that this item be continued until November 21,1989,as guidelines need to be considered closely prior to taking any action on this. Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT ITEM NO.16-1,DIRECTION ON BUSINESS LICENSE REVIEW COMMITTEE,BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 21,1989. Councilman Cox seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. 2.DIRECTION TO STAFF TO DRAFT A PROCESS AND/OR POLICY FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 19 Councilman Vehon suggested a committee be formed with Building Department staff and councilmembers to bring this back to the Council on these Code Enforcement Procedures. Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly stated that the Council has a job description for the Code Enforcement position,and asked i f the recruitment for the position be held up until these procedures are established? Mayor Bluntschly stated that recruitment should not be held up,and the methodology for enforcement can be done after the hiring. Assistant to the City Manager George Hoffman stated that i f the Council wishes,i t should be specified that the recruitment include police experience as a requirement. Mayor Bluntschly stated that i t should,as there is a point in a investigation where i t becomes accusatory,and this would require a police background. Ms Connelly commented that the Council appeared to want someone who could put the violations through the court process,which would require some experience in law enforcement. Councilman Vehon stated that the budgeted amount for this position may not be sufficient for someone with law enforcement qualifications. Mayor Bluntschly replied that this position will not be working as a police officer. Ms Connelly explained that a police officer has many other types of responsibilities,as well as on -going training. Vice Mayor Damiano asked i f this person will wear a uniform and a badge,as well as a "walkie-talkie",to show authority? Mayor Bluntschly agreed with the uniform concept,but not the police radio. Vice Mayor Damiano asked about the person encountering a problem,where he may need to contact the police? Councilman Cox stated that he should carry a gun i f he's wearing a uniform. Director of Public Safety Bill McDaniel stated that the liability becomes really great when a person carrys a REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 20 gun,and they would have to be qualified on the range,but that the person could carry a radio with Public Works frequency for assistance should i t be required, otherwise a police officer could do the job of code enforcement. Councilman Cox stated that this was the idea,to put a retired officer in the position. Councilwoman Alger suggested putting the position under the Police Department in the upcoming budget. Mayor Bluntschly stated that unfortunately this was not budgeted this way for this year,and i t cannot wait. Mr.McDaniel stated that other cities do have this position under the Police Department. Councilman Vehon asked i f a recommendation can be made at this time for hiring this person? Councilwoman Alger asked i f the idea of putting these types of positions under the Police Department could also be investigated? Ms Connelly stated the funds currently designated for these positions may not be sufficient for the Police Department. Councilman Vehon stated that the Council is making administrative decisions by doing this. Mayor Bluntschly pointed out that this policy will be brought back to the Council,prior to instituting it. Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE ACTING CITY MANAGER AND BUILDING OFFICIAL TO FORM A COMMITTEE TO STUDY CHANGES IN THE CODE FOR ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES,AND THAT COMMITTEE TO BE MADE UP OF A MINIMUM OF THE ACTING CITY MANAGER,BUILDING OFFICIAL, ACTING/INTERIM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR,TWO COUNCILPERSONS,AND TWO INTERESTED CITIZENS AT -LARGE,TO BRING BACK A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL FOR THE DECEMBER 19,1989 MEETING,ALONG WITH ALLOWING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO GO AHEAD WITH THE HIRING OF AN ADDITIONAL CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSON WITH THAT PERSON HAVING BACKGROUND IN LAW ENFORCEMENT,AND AT THE SAME PAY SCALE AS WAS BUDGETED. Councilman Cox seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 21 3.DIRECTION TO STAFF TO PREPARE AN AMENDMENT TO PURCHASING PROCEDURES. Acting City Manager/City Clerk Kathleen Connelly explained that Controller Keith Lewis and herself had come across errors or oversights in the purchasing procedures that warrant changes, and also the auditors have made some suggestions for changes due to double paying bills with the current procedures. Ms Connelly reminded the Council that a number of direction items have been given to staff to work on,and the Council may keep in mind that an election is coming up which will involve more work. Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO REVIEW PURCHASING PROCEDURES AND TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE. Vice Mayor Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. 4.DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING PLACEMENT OF TRASH DUMPSTERS. Councilman Cox MOVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN STAFF TO SET REGULATIONS REGULATING DUMPSTERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS, PREFERABLY IN THE ALLEYS,NONE IN FRONT YARDS OR SIDE YARDS,EXCEPT FOR COMMERCIAL DUMPSTERS USED BY CONTRACTORS WHEN REBUILDING A HOUSE OR REMODELING A HOUSE,AND THAN ONLY FOR THE SHORTEST PERIOD OF TIME NECESSARY. Vice Mayor Damiano seconded the motion. Councilman Vehon stated that there is a concern that most commercial buildings do not have alleys for dumpsters,so this needs to be addressed. Councilman Cox stated that this is only looking at residential areas,as commercial buildings don't put them in the front. Councilwoman Alger stated that not all individual businesses have alleys. Mr.McDaniel stated that some use the side,because there isn't a back access. Mayor Bluntschly suggested including commercial to be checked on,so as not to restrict the Council in changes. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 22 Vice Mayor Damiano commented that a smart businessman wouldn't put a dumpster in the front. Councilman Vehon stated that he knows of two or three,as there is not back access. Councilman Cox amended the motion THAT STAFF INCLUDE THEIR RESEARCH FOR ALL COMMERCIAL DUMPSTERS,AND WHERE IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE,PUT IT ON THE SIDE. Vice Mayor Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE (on the amendment):Unanimous VOTE (on the motion as amended):Unanimous The motion carried. 5.DIRECTION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE LOCATION OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES IN REAR YARD AREAS. Councilman Vehon stated that there have been problems with the current requirement for travel trailers and the like,as i t is virtually impossible to enforce. Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE,SECTION 20.0106,TO ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR A GARAGE,RAMADA,OR SHIELDING WITH A FENCE OR PLANTING,AND JUST LOOK AT A REQUIREMENT THAT THEY BE PLACED IN THE REAR YARD. Vice Mayor Damiano seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. 6.SPECIFIC DIRECTION IN ESTABLISHING A HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION. Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH AN ORDINANCE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION,WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS: THAT THE ORDINANCE PRESENTED BE BROUGHT BACK FOR ADOPTION AFTER INSERTING THE PROPER TERM EXPIRATION DATES,WITH STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS COMMISSION BE ASSIGNED THROUGH THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE. REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 23 Councilman Cox seconded the motion. Vice Mayor Damiano asked i f this isn't on the books already? Ms Connelly stated that currently a commission is on the books with duties dealing mainly with the location of hospital facilities,and that this will substitute that ordinance. Councilwoman Barker asked i f the membership is limited to Apache Junction citizens,and will not go into the zone of influence? Councilwoman Alger stated that the reason she was given,upon asking that question,was that i t is because of monies spent,i t has to be within the City limits. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. 9.DIRECTION TO STAFF TO DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CODE REGARDING THE CITY MANAGER POSITION. Ms Connelly explained that i t was discovered by the City Attorney,herself,and other staff members,at a Risk Management Seminar,that the City Code is presently in conflict with the State Law in regards to the City Manager which places the City at risk. City Attorney David Alexander further explained that i t is Section 3-1-10 of the City Code,which mentions limiting the right of removal during the first 90 days,term of new council,and also gives the City Manager certain hearing rights. Mayor Bluntschly specifically mentioned the State Law states that the City Manager serves at the pleasure of the Council. Councilman Vehon MOVED THAT DIRECTION BE GIVEN THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ACTING CITY MANAGER TO REVIEW THE CITY CODE AND DRAFT AMENDMENTS PERTAINING TO THE CITY MANAGER POSITION,TO BRING THE CODE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. Councilwoman Barker seconded the motion. VOTE:Unanimous REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 24 The motion carried. SELECTION OF MEETING DATES,TIMES,LOCATIONS AND PURPOSES: EXECUTIVE SESSION,WORK SESSION, NOVEMBER 20,1989 EXECUTIVE SESSION,WORK SESSION, NOVEMBER 21,1989 SELECTION OF DATE AND TIME FOR SPECIAL EXECUTIVE SESSION )Councilwoman Alger MOVED THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 20,1989,AT 6:00 P.M.,IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM,AND A WORK SESSION AT 7:00 P.M.,ON NOVEMBER 20,1989, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS; AND THAT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND WORK SESSION BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 21,1989,AT 6:00 P.M.,IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Vice Mayor Damiano seconded the motion. Mayor Bluntschly mentioned that the additional executive session will not be necessary. VOTE:Unanimous The motion carried. INFORMATION AND REPORTS (COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS) None. ADJOURNMENT )There being no further discussion, Mayor Bluntschly adjourned the meeting at 10:40 p.m. *Consent Agenda Items are as follows: 1.Acceptance of Regular Meeting Agenda 2.Acceptance of Minutes from the Regular Meeting of October 17,1989 3.Authorization to Install City Complex Parking Lot Lights REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 25 4.Award of Bid for the Renovation and Improvements to Little League Baseball Fields 5.Acceptance of Resignation from and Appointment to,the Board of Adjustments 6.Removal of Mr.Bob Brown from Planning and Zoning Commission,and Appointment to fill Vacancy Created by Removal 7.Request for Postponement of Changing the Sales Tax 8.Proposed Resolution No.89-31,Endorsing Annexation of additional State Land into the Apache Junction Fire District Boundaries 9.Request for Postponement of Establishing a Board of Appeals and Board for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings 10.Selection of Consultants for Legal and Financial Services in the area of Municipal Wastewater Facilities and Related Municipal Bonding Programs ACCEPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER ,1989,BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION,ARIZONA. SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER KERVETH BLUNTSCHLY Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Connelly City Clerk REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7,1989 PAGE 26 ,1989.