HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024 05.21 City Council Regular Agenda City of Apache Junction, Arizona Meeting location:
City Council Chambers
at City Hall
Agenda 300 E.Superstition Blvd
g Apache Junction,AZ
City Council Meeting 85119
apachejunctionaz.gov
Ph:(480)982-8002
Doors are open to the public at least 15 minutes prior to the
posted meeting start time.
Tuesday, May 21,2024 7:00 PM City Council Chambers
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. CONSENT AGENDA
The council may, at this time, take single action on any or all items listed as consent agenda items.
These may include, but are not limited to, acceptance of agenda, acceptance of minutes, appointments,
acceptance of resignations and adoption of certain resolutions and other items which do not require a
public hearing. The consent agenda is a timesaving device of which the mayor and city council is to
receive documentation on these items from the city manager for their review prior to the meeting. Any
member of the council may remove any item from the consent agenda for discussion and cause a
separate vote on the matter later in the agenda.
1. 24-341 Consideration of acceptance of agenda.
Sponsors: Jennifer Pena
2. 24-419 Consideration of approval of minutes of the special meeting of May
6, 2024.
Sponsors: Jennifer Pena
Attachments: SP CCMIN 2024 05 06 MINUTES DRAFT
3. 24- 42 Consideration of approval of minutes of the regular meeting of May
7, 2024.
Sponsors: Jennifer Pena
Attachments: CCMIN 2024 05 07 MINUTES DRAFT
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City Council Meeting Agenda May 21.2024
4^ Consideration of approval of the second amendment buthe
professional services agreement between City of Apache Junction
and Central Arizona Council on Developmental Disabilities.
Sponsors:� Jamie Sullivan
Attachments: Memo to Council
EXECUTED 2017 QACQQ Contract
EXECUTED First Amendment 2022
5_ Consideration of approval of Resolution No. 24-20. authorizing the
City nf Apache Junction tn enter into an intergovernmental agreement
with Apache Junction Unified School District#43 for grant-funded
School Resource Officers.
Sponsors: NYiohao| Poo|oy
Attachments: Memo to City Council-IGA SRO AJUSD
6, Consideration of approval of Resolution 24-21, adopting the budget
for Fiscal Year 2024-2O25 for Streetlight Improvement District No.
2021-02 Coyote Crossing subdivision.
Sponsors: Ted Wolff
Attachments: Council memo Coyote Crossing SLID No. 2021-02
Resolution 24-21 Coyote Crossing Budget
7, Consideration of approval of Public Works Capital Improvement
Plan for Fiscal Years 2025 through 202S.
Sponsors:� Ted Wolff
Attachments:
E. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
Awards,presentations from other organizations,proclamations issued by the mayor, and
acknowledgement of distinguished guests and visitors, and staff presentation of receipt of grant or
donated funds are permitted at this time.
F. REGIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL UPDATES
The mayor or any member of council may at this time present a brief summary of any regional
intergovernmental updates. However, no discussion shall take place on such items except for clarifying
comments related bo substance, time and location.
8_ Brief summary of intergovernmental updates from mayor and
ununci|membern.
Sponsors: Chip Wilson
City vr Apache Junction,Arizona Page Printed on 511612024
City Council Meeting Agenda May 21,2024
G. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
The city manager, members of city staff or those individuals designated by the manager may present
information pertinent to items under consideration or information related to the operation of the city.
There shall however be no discussion at this time except for clarification inquiries.
9. 24-344 City Manager's Report.
Sponsors: Bryant Powell
10. 24-437 Announcement of Current Events.
Sponsors: Jorge Gutierrez
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings required by applicable law shall be conducted by the council and any person shall be
given the opportunity to speak.All remarks shall be addressed to the council as a whole and not to any
member thereof. Such remarks shall be limited to five(5)minutes unless additional time is granted by
the mayor. This time limitation shall not apply to applicants and their agents appearing before the
council.
11. 24-420 Conduct a public hearing to receive input and discuss potential
projects for the utilization of Fiscal Year 2024 ("FY24") Community
Development Block Grant("CDBG") Regional Account ("RA")
funds and State Special Project("SSP")funds.
Sponsors: Misty Moseley
Attachments: Staff report w CDBG Public Hearing##1LP21(002
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 3 Printed on 511612024
City Council Meeting Agenda May 21,2024
12, 24-421 Presentation, discussion, public hearing and consideration of
Resolution No. 24-09 (case P-23-64-GPA), requested by Jason
Barney and John Hartman with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties
LLC, and represented by Greg Davis with (plan Consulting for a
proposed major general plan land use map amendment to
redesignate 18 acres at the southeast corner of US-60 and Goldfield
Road from Commercial to High Density Residential. (This is the
companion case to Rezoning Case P-23-63-PZ).
Sponsors: Kelsey Schattnik
Attachments: P-23-63-PZ&P-23-64-GPA CC PH-MEMO. df
DRAFT RESOLUTION NO,24-09. df
1. Narrativ�
2. Site Plan, df
3, Elevations and Floor Pians.pdf
4. Landsca e Plans. df
5, Wall Plans. df
6. Final Partici anon Report Silvera pdf
7. GPA External A enc Res oases. d#
8. Resident LettersJ4.25.24 pdf
9. Updated Protest Petition 03,20.2024,pdf
10. Vicinity Mamd#
11. Traffic Impact Analysis.pdf
12. Market Study(a plicant .pdf
13. P-24-63-PZ&P-24-64-GPA PZ Staff Re ort. df
13. 24-422 Presentation, discussion, public hearing and consideration of
Ordinance No. 1547 (case P-23-63-PZ), requested by Jason Barney
and John Hartman with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC, and
represented by Greg Davis with (plan Consulting for a proposed
planned development rezoning of 18 acres located at the southeast
corner of US-60 and Goldfield Road from General Commercial by
Planned Development("B-1/PD")and B-1/PD to High Density
Multiple-Family Residential by Planned Development("RM-2/PD").
(This is the companion case to Major General Plan Amendment Case
P-23-64-GPA).
Sponsors: Kelsey Schattnik
Attachments: P-23-63-PZ&P-23-64-GPA CC PH-MEMO. df
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1547. df
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. df
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 4 Printed on 5/16/2024
City Council Meeting Agenda May 21,2024
14. 24-423 Presentation, discussion, public hearing and consideration of
Resolution No. 24-08, declaring as a public record that certain
document filed with the City Clerk and entitled "Legal Descriptions
and Zoning Conditions of Case No. P-23-63-PZ;" repealing any
conflicting provisions and providing for severability.
Sponsors: Kelsey Schattnik
Attachments: P-23-63-PZ&P-23-64-GPA CC PH-MEMO. df
DRAFT RESOLUTION NO.24-08e dt
1. OLD BUSINESS
The council shall consider any business that has been previously considered and which is still
unfinished to include those items previously postponed or tabled. No member of the public shall be
permitted to speak on these items unless invited to do so by the mayor after first submitting a written
request-to-speak form with the city clerk.
J. NEW BUSINESS
The council shall consider any business not yet considered. No member of the public shall be permitted
to speak on these items unless invited to do so by the mayor after first submitting a written
request-to-speak form with the city clerk.
15. 24-44 Presentation, discussion, and possible adoption of the Rodeo
Grounds Event Center Master Plan.
Sponsors: Liz Langenbach
Attachments: Memo City Council Rodeo Grounds Master Plan-_May 2024
RODEO EVENT CENTER MASTER PLAN PRESENTATION-I
K. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF
This item allows the mayor and city council to direct staff on specifically listed matters.
L. SELECTION OF MEETING DATES, TIMES, LOCATIONS, AND PURPOSES
M. CALL TO PUBLIC
At this time the public has the privilege to address the council with requests, communications,
comments or suggestions relating to city business.All speakers must have already submitted a written
"Request to Speak"form to the city clerk no later than the conclusion of the city manager's report portion
of the agenda. If there is a group speaking on the same item, they should select a spokesperson.All
such remarks shall be addressed to the council as a whole and not to any member thereof. The mayor
is authorized to ask a speaker to stop speaking and leave the podium or to adjourn the meeting if
anyone becomes disorderly, uncivil, makes personal attacks or continues to speak about items that are
not within the jurisdiction of the city after being warned such issues are beyond the jurisdiction of the city
to act. The council may not answer questions of the speaker, discuss the matter with one another, but
may, at the conclusion: 1)respond to criticism by a speaker;2)ask the city manager to review a matter;
3)ask the city manager to place the matter on a future agenda. Each speaker must approach the
podium, speak into the microphone,provide their name and address. There is a three(3)minute time
limit per speaker.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 5 Printed on 5/16/2024
City Council Meeting Agenda May 21,2024
N. ADJOURNMENT
Copies of this agenda and additional information on any of the items listed above may be obtained from
the City Clerk's office located at 300 E Superstition Blvd,Apache Junction,AZ 85119, Monday through
Thursday from 7:00a-6:00p, excluding holidays.
The City of Apache Junction invites and welcomes people of all abilities to use our programs, sites and
facilities. Specific requests may be made by contacting the Human Resources Office at(480)474-2617
or TDD(480)983-0095.
The Apache Junction City Council may vote to go into Executive Session for legal advice on any item
listed on this agenda pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3);this notice is given pursuant to A.R.S. §
38-431.02 to the members of the City Council and the public.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 6 Printed on 5/16/2024
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No. 1.
File ID: 24-341
Sponsor:Jennifer Pena Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Consideration of acceptance of agenda.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.2.
File ID: 24-419
Sponsor:Jennifer Pena Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Consideration of approval of minutes of the special meeting of May 6, 2024.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction, Arizona Meeting location:
City Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes at City Hall
300 E Superstition Blvd
Special Meeting of the Apache Apache Junction,AZ
p g p 85119
Junction City Council
apachejunctionaz.gov
Ph:(480)982-8002
Monday,May 6,2024 7:00 PM City Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Wilson called the special meeting of the Apache Junction city council to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present 7- Mayor Wilson
Vice Mayor Schroeder
Councilmember Cross
Councilmember Heck
Councilmember Johnson
Councilmember Nesser
Councilmember Soller
Staff in Attendance:
Bryant Powell, City Manager
Matt Busby, Assistant City Manager
Jennifer Pena, City Clerk
Joel Stern, City Attorney
Rudy Esquivias, Development Services Director
Ted Wolff, Public Works Director
Liz Langenbach, Parks& Recreation Director
Patrick Ainsworth, Economic Development Director
Pam Harrison, Library Director
Angelie Hawley, Finance Director
Anna McCray, Human Resources Director
Connie Chow, Finance Controller
Evie McKinney, Deputy City Clerk
Sidney Urias, Planning Manager
Kelsey Schattnik, Planner
CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEMS
PUBLIC HEARING
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Pagel
Special Meeting of the Apache Meeting Minutes May 6,2024
Junction City Council
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
1. 24-300 Presentation and discussion with the mayor and city council on the Fiscal
Year 2024-2025 budget, classification and compensation plan for city
employees, and the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System
(PSPRS) Pension Funding Policy.
City Manager Bryant Powell introduced the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 budget, (FY24-25),
classification and compensation plan, and explained some of the changes in this budget
compared to previous years. He shared some upcoming challenges will be surrounding
communities possibly becoming cities, which will impact our share of intergovernmental
revenue, and the loss of the rental tax effective January 2025.
Assistant City Manager Matt Busby gave special thanks and recognition to Controller Connie
Chow for her dedication to serve and maintain the Finance department roles in the budget
preparation during the interim of the vacant Finance Director position from January through April.
Mr. Busby also commended Human Resources Director Anna McCray for the efforts she put
forth on the salaries, benefits, and the classification and compensation schedule for the Police
Department and all other city employees. Staff works well and does a great job in fine tuning
our budget in a timely manner.
Finance Director Angelie Hawley shared key budget assumptions of positive activity with sales
tax, decrease in state shared revenues- rental tax eliminated effective January 2025, which will
create an estimated decrease of$2.1 million, employee compensation increases and capital
projects will proceed as planned for the General and Special Revenue Funds. Ms. Hawley
presented various slides that reflected the budget summary, general fund revenues and
expenditures, special revenue fund revenues and expenditures, capital projects for FY 2025,
and some of the before and after completed capital projects for FY 2024.
Council commented on the professionalism and hard work that staff has done to create this
finished project, clarification on special revenues, and funding amount for the landfill.
Assistant City Manager Matt Busby answered Council queries, and stated the next steps are to
conduct a special meeting for tentative budget adoption to be held Monday, May 20th, 2024, and
final budget adoption on June 17, 2024.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Wilson adjourned the meeting at 7:14 p.m.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 2
Special Meeting of the Apache Meeting Minutes May 6,2024
Junction City Council
ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF 12024, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF 12024.
WALTER"CHIP"WILSON
Mayor
ATTEST:
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
1 hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the
special meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, held on the
day of , 2024. 1 further certify that the meeting was duly
called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this day of 2024.
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 3
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.3.
File ID: 24-342
Sponsor:Jennifer Pena Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Consideration of approval of minutes of the regular meeting of May 7, 2024.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction, Arizona Meeting location:
City Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes at City Hall
300 E.Superstition Blvd
CityCouncil Meeting Apache Junction,AZ
g 85119
apachejunctionaz.gov
Ph:(480)982-8002
Tuesday,May 7,2024 7:00 PM City Council Chambers
A. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Wilson called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
B. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Nesser gave the invocation and Councilmember Heck led the meeting attendees
in the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. ROLL CALL
Present: 7- Mayor Wilson
Vice Mayor Schroeder
Councilmember Nesser
Councilmember Heck
Councilmember Johnson
Councilmember Cross
Councilmember Soller
Staff in Attendance:
Bryant Powell, City Manager
Jennifer Pena, City Clerk
Joel Stern, City Attorney
Michael Pooley, Police Chief
Rudy Esquivias, Development Services Director
Ted Wolff, Public Works Director
Liz Langenbach, Parks& Recreation Director
Angelie Hawley, Finance Director
Adrian Alegria Building Safety Manager/Building Official
Evie McKinney, Deputy City Clerk
D. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Heck moved,seconded by Vice Mayor Schroeder to approve the Consent
Agenda.
Yes: 7- Mayor Wilson, Vice Mayor Schroeder, Councilmember Nesser, Councilmember
Heck, Councilmember Johnson, Councilmember Cross and Councilmember
Soller
No: 0
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1
City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes May 7.2V24
1' Consideration of acceptance ofagenda.
2. 24-(336 Consideration 0f approval 0f minutes 0f the regular meeting Of April 10,
2024.
3. 24-250 Consideration Of approval 0f the proposed Resolution No. 24-O4
authorizing the city to enter into the Intergovernmental Agreement (|GA)
Amendment No. 1 with Arizona Department of Transportation (A[}C)-[)for
additional federal funds to cover the increased construction costs inthe
amount Of$354.O07 for bicycle and pedestrian improvements 0D
Delaware Drive from 18th Avenue to Broadway Avenue.
4. 24-252 Consideration Of approval On the proposed Resolution NO24-O0
authorizing the city tO enter into the |Ot8rgOv8rDDleDt8| Agngg08Dt (|GA)
Amendment No. 2 with Arizona Department 0f Transportation (ADOT)for
additional federal funds tO cover the increased construction costs inthe
amount of$333,871 for roadway and safety improvements on
Winchester Road from 29th Avenue to Southern Avenue.
5' 24-271| Consideration Of approval Of Resolution No. 24-14 and Resolution No.
24-17. Resolutions of the Mayor and City Council of the City ofApache
Junction, Arizona, designating Ange|ie Hawley ae Chief Fiscal Officer for
officially submitting and certifying the accuracy Of fiscal years 2024and
2U25 expenditure limitation reports to the Arizona Auditor General.
E. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
6. 24-347. Formal presentation by mayor of certificates of graduation tothe
participants of the 2O24 Citizen Leadership Institute.
Production Marketing & Communications Specialist Matthew McNulty congratulated the 24th
graduating class of the Citizens Leadership Institute and presented each of them with their
certificate. A photo was taken with the class attendees, Mayor and Councilmembers.
7. 24-348 Proclamation designating the week Of May 12-18. 2O24. aS "Peace
Officer Memorial VV88k"
(|ounoi|memberSoUer read the proclamation. Apache Junction Police Chief Michael Poo|ey
accepted the proclamation, and expressed his thanks to the Mayor and Council, on behalf of the
Apache Junction Police Department. He shared that in law enforcement many officers lose their
lives in the line ofduty. Ha stated the number uf police officers lost in the line of duty in2023
was 137. compared to58at this time in2024. Over 41 years ago, an Apache Junction Police
Officer, Russell L. Duncan, was killed during a training accident. This Proclamation is
memorial to honor those that have lost their lives like Officer Duncan, as well as those killed
while protecting their communities.
8' Proclamation designating May 18, 2O24' GS "Kids tO Parks DGy."
Counoi|mombnrNeoser read the proclamation. Parks and Recreation Superintendent Jamie
Sullivan, and Parks and Recreation Management Analyst Riley King received the proclamation.
City vr Apache Junction,Arizona Page
City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes May 7,2024
Ms. Sullivan thanked the Mayor and Councilmembers for supporting this special day. She
shared that this event began 14 years ago through the National Park Trust and is always held
the third Saturday in May. She reminded everyone of the importance and value of our parks. So
much so, that 84%of US adults seek high quality Parks and Recreation when choosing where
they want to live. The public is invited to attend the festivities at Prospector Park, May 18, 2024,
beginning at 7:00 p.m.
9. 24-308 Proclamation designating the week of May 19-25, 2024, as "Public
Works Week."
Vice Mayor Schroeder read the proclamation designating May 19th through May 25th, 2024, as
Public Works Week and presented it to Public Works Director Ted Wolff. Mr. Wolff thanked the
Mayor and Councilmembers on behalf of the Public Works Department for this recognition. He
shared statistics that the department,which consists of 26 staff members, handles over 200
miles of road maintenance, 16,000 signs, 13 buildings, and 350 pieces of heavy equipment. In
addition, the department is dedicated to 24 hour on-call service for flood and emergency
situations.
10. 24-32 Proclamation designating May 2024 as "Building Safety Month."
Councilmember Heck read the proclamation recognizing the month of May 2024 as Building
Safety Month. Building and Safety Manager Adrian Alegria accepted the proclamation, and
expressed his thanks and appreciation to the Mayor and Councilmembers. He shared that on
Saturday May 4, 2024, the Development Services department held a community outreach event
in recognition of Building Safety Month, where over 300 community members attended. Several
local businesses contributed to the fun activities. Mr.Alegria shared his appreciation to
Development Services Director Rudy Esquivias and Senior Permit Technician Leslie Castillo for
the success of the event.
Councilmember Heck attended this event and thanked the Development Services staff for a
great job in presenting the much needed information. Councilmember Soller was also present
and expressed how great it was to see the focus and energy placed on career training in trades
and construction outside of college education.
F. REGIONAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL UPDATES
11. 24-337 Brief summary of intergovernmental updates from mayor and
councilmembers.
Vice Mayor Schroeder commented on the recent event held at Blossom Rock, and how
impressive this development is, and the amazing strides Apache Junction has done to make
this happen. Mayor Wilson also commented on the lake and the various parks and playgrounds
to be added, and the benefits these amenities will bring to the community.
Mayor Wilson attended a Recognition of Volunteers event at Banner Hospital. The recognition
was shared amongst volunteers from both the Ironwood and Goldfield facilities, where hours
served ranged from 100 to 7,000. The volunteer program has grown tremendously over the
past year, with an addition of over 50 new volunteers serving between both facilities.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 3
City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes May 7,2024
G. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
12. 24-339 City Manager's Report.
City Manager Bryant Powell shared the volunteering recently offered by a local veterans group to
honor the Veteran's Memorial Park. A beautiful new sign has been placed and a picture was
shared of the recent ribbon cutting ceremony. Councilmember Johnson added that many of our
veterans in the city are very happy and honored by this new sign and the park overall. They are
discussing how to raise corporate funds to obtain military insignias to have added to the park
area. This would be no cost to the City, rather, purchases would be made by various companies
within the city.
Mr. Powell highlighted the May 4th Building Safety event, in that it was a great way of helping
residents understand the importance of Building Safety and what the department does, as well
as sharing with youth how essential it can be to become involved in a trade and earn a livable
wage without college debt.
13. 24-35 Update on the Youth Advisory Council's accomplishments this year.
Recreation Coordinator for Senior Services and School Programs JJ Underwood thanked the
Mayor and Council for their support over the past year to the Youth Advisory Council, (YAC). He
shared the various projects and volunteer hours contributed by YAC and introduced President
Nathaly Alonso. Ms. Alonso presented a Year in Review video, that showcased the many
events held by this group of young advocates. Council inquired if the events held were
pre-planned, or organized originally by the group. Mr. Underwood explained these efforts are a
combination of some pre-planned events, but many of them are the original ideas shared by
YAC.
14. 24-356 Presentation by Michael Barry, Director of Development at Scottsdale
Training & Rehabilitation Services (STARS).
City Manager Bryant Powell introduced Director of Development with Scottsdale Training &
Rehabilitation Services (STARS), Michael Barry.
Mr. Barry shared a presentation on this organization that began in 1973,which was primarily
developed to address the lack of services to the disabled individuals of all types in the city of
Scottsdale. The mission now is to address the needs of cognitive and intellectual disabilities, by
teaching life and job training skills. He expressed the interest for the organization and its growth
is for Apache Junction to understand the scope of services offered by STARS, enlist help of
STARS within the school district to help transitioning students into the adult world, and share the
mission of STARS throughout the network of community and constituents.
Mayor Wilson shared his appreciation for this type of organization and commented on the great
benefits that can be achieved by getting involved with the training offered.
15. 24-340 Announcement of Current Events.
Management Analyst Eli Richardson shared the following upcoming events:
*Open House Party, Saturday May 11, 2024, Multi-Generational Center. This is being
held to exhibit the amenities offered at the Center, without having to pay for a day pass.
* Downtown Master Plan Update, May 8, 2024, 6:00pm at Multi-Generational Center.
City Staff is looking for input and ideas to possibly weave into the downtown plan.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 4
City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes May 7,2024
* Free Dump Week, May 6-11, 2024. Allows for one truck load of refuse to Apache
Junction Landfill for free
* Letter Carriers' Food Drive for Superstition Community Food Bank,
Saturday, May 11, 2024
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. OLD BUSINESS
J. NEW BUSINESS
16. 24-357 Presentation and discussion with Detective Frank Nicholls of AJPD's
Community Response Enforcement Unit, introducing new K-9 workmate,
Tessa.
Police Chief Michael Pooley introduced the newest Police Department member, Tessa, a 2 year
old German Shorthair Pointer, who has been trained in 4 odors of narcotic detection. She works
along side Detective Frank Nicholls. Chief Pooley expressed the value a canine officer can do
that is heavily relied on for drug control and enforcement. Tessa will also be used in the schools
for various demonstrations. Detective Nicholls shared the extensive training Tessa had
completed prior to on-boarding with Apache Junction Police Department, as well as the
furthered certifications with him after their introduction.
Chief Pooley commented that Tessa is very active, and extremely eager to work everyday. He
then thanked the Mayor and Council for their support in helping grow the Apache Junction Police
Department with this added member.
K. COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF
L. SELECTION OF MEETING DATES, TIMES, LOCATIONS, AND PURPOSES
M. CALL TO PUBLIC
Andre Meek, 1327 S. Belair Road, Apache Junction, commented on the Citizen's Leadership
Institute graduates, and the Peace Officer Memorial Week Proclamation.
Donna Carr, 2178 W.Virginia Street, Apache Junction, shared programs she had knowledge of
that are comparable to the STARS organization, and her disapproval of the use of reclaimed
water.
Steve Kitzman, 1832 W. Shiprock, Apache Junction, encouraged the adoption of a regulation
that would ban the feeding of pigeons, dove, quail and other wild birds and animals in the
Apache Junction city limits. He shared damage he has experienced at his home, due to
neighbors feeding of birds. Mr. Kitzman shared handouts to the City Clerk on a neighboring city
Ordinance and a state law.
Connie Wegeng, 1431 N. Cortez Road, Apache Junction, requested approval for a home she
owns on S. Meridian Drive, to be relocated to an adjacent parcel. She submitted photos of the
home to the City Clerk for distribution to Mayor and Councilmembers.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 5
City Council Meeting Meeting Minutes May 7,2024
Council requested staff to research the ordinance shared regarding feeding of birds and wild
animals, and to look into the request of relocating the home on Meridian Drive.
N. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Wilson adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
ACCEPTED THIS DAY OF 2024, BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA.
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF 2024.
WALTER"CHIP"WILSON
Mayor
ATTEST:
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apache Junction, Arizona, held on the
day of , 2024. 1 further certify that the meeting was duly
called and held and that a quorum was present.
Dated this day of 2024.
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 6
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.4.
File ID: 24-410
Sponsor:Jamie Sullivan Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Consideration of approval of the second amendment to the professional services agreement
between City of Apache Junction and Central Arizona Council on Developmental Disabilities.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
cityo a e ]unction
Rlzo
Home Of the Superstition Mountains
Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council.
Memorandum Through: Liz Langenbach,Parks and Recreation Director
Bryant Powell, City Manager
Memorandum From: Jamie Sullivan,Recreation Superintendent
Date: April 22nd 2024
Subject: Professional Service Agreement for Senior Transportation
On August 15Y 2017, The City of Apache Junction entered into an agreement with Central Arizona Council On
Developmental Disabilities("CACDD")to provide transportation services to our senior and disabled populations.
Transportation services included: transportation to and from the MGC for weekday lunch,medical and shopping
trips. The first amendment was created in 2022, extending the contract and adjusting pricing. This is the second
amendment to the agreement.
This program is funded through Pinal Gila Council for Seniors Citizens ("PGCSC"),the general fund, grants and
participant donations.
The notable changes in the amendment to the agreement are:
• moving to a flat daily rate for group MGC transportation instead of a per person fee
• moving to a flat daily rate for additional group trips instead of per person and mileage.
• increasing individual medical/shopping trips from $6 per mile to $8 mile.
These changes are within our total budgeted costs for senior services. Staff feel this is a fair adjustment resulting
from market conditions.
This is a great program providing various transportation options to the senior community. The partnership with
CACDD has been very successful and staff recommend this contract for council's approval.
300 E.Superstition Blvd.•APACHE JUNCTION,AZ 85219*mavw.ajcitX.net •PHONE(480)983-2181•FAX(480)982-2438•TDD(480)983-0095
AGREEMENT FOR SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTIONI II
PROJECT NO. PR-17-03
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the-CITY.OF_. _. :A_. CH_.
JUNCTION ("City"), an Arizona municipal corporation, and CentralArizona Council on
Developmental Disabilities ("Contractor"), both whomshall collectively be referred o as the
"Parties", or individually as y88
RECITALS
A. Contractor has responded to ity's request for proposal via RFP No. PR-17-0 ,
in which Contractor asserts its willingness, ability and qualifications to provide
this work service ( "Work").
B. City and Contractor desire to sat forth herein their respective responsibilities and
the manner and terms upon whichContractors all render the services.
C. City has complied with the public bidding requirements under Arizona Revised
Statute Title 34 andApache Junction City Code, Volume 1, Chapter :
Administration, rticl ® , Procurement Procedure.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, City retains Contractor to perform, and Contractor agrees to
render the services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth as follows:
1. PROJECT I TContractor shall o n o or cause t o
performed in goodworkmanlike manner, the Work in accordance with the contract documents
as fully described in the Notice Inviting Bid Proposals for Project No. -1 7-03, as well as
Contractor's response, both of which include all required specifications, a copy of which are on
file with the Citys Parks and Recreation Department.
2 PRICES: Prices shall be governed under attached i i "TransportationCosts", the
Contraa-or'sresponseto Project No. -1 for performance of the Work.
e CONTRACT T e Initial Term of this agreement shall be from 2017
to Jun , 2018. Thereafter, is agreement shall automatically e renewed for f Ad
i io al
cane-year( ) periods with e final end date of June 30, 2022. The City reserves i t
unilaterally n the one-year( periods by thirty-one (3 ) days.
. LABOR AND MATERIALS: Unless otherwise provided in the contract documents,
Contractor s all provide, pay and insure under the requisite laws and regulations for all labor,
transportation, and other related services necessary forte proper execution and completion o
the Work whether temporary or permanent, and whether or not incorporated or to be
incorporated in the Work.
. TAXES: Contractor shall pay all license, sales, consumer, use n other similar taxes
1
for the Work or portions thereof provided by Contractor which are legally enacted at the time
bids are received whether or not yet effective or subsequently applicable due to acts of
jurisdictions or bodies other than City, Further, Contractor agrees to pay all applicable privilege
and use taxes that are applicable to the Work under the Agreement.
6. PERMITS & FEES: Unless otherwise provided in the contract documents, Contractor
shall secure and pay for all permits, governmental fees, licenses and inspections necessary for
the proper execution and completion of Work which are customarily secured after execution of
the contract and which are legally required. Contractor shall give all notices and comply with all
laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and lawful orders of any public authority bearing on the
performance of the Work. Contractor represents and warrants that any license necessary to
perform the Work under this Agreement is current and valid. Contractor understands that the
activity described herein constitutes "doing business in the City of Apache Junction" and
Contractor agrees to obtain a business license pursuant to Article 8-2 of the Apache Junction
City Code, Vol. 1, and keep such license current during the term of this Agreement. Contractor
also acknowledges that the tax provision of the Apache Junction Tax Code, Chapter 8A, may
also apply and if so, shall obtain a privilege license. Any activity by subcontractors within the
corporate city limits will invoke the same business and privilege license regulations on any
subcontractors, and Contractor ensures its subcontractors will obtain any required licenses. If
there are taxable activities, a business license shall be converted to a privilege license by the
Contractor and any subcontractors through the City Clerk's Office.
7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: Contractor shall at all times during Contractor's
performance of the services retain Contractor's status as an independent Contractor.
Contractor's employees shall under no circumstances be considered or held to be employees or
agents of City, and City shall have no obligation to pay or withhold state or federal taxes, or
provide workers compensation or unemployment insurance for or on behalf of them or
Contractor. Contractor shall supervise and direct the delivery of the materials using its best skill
and attention. Except as provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall be solely responsible for
all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures, and for coordinating all portions of
the Work required by the contract documents. Contractor shall be responsible to City for the
acts and omissions of its employees,
8. INDEMNIFICATION: To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend,
indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected officials, agents, and employees from and against
any and all liability including but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs and
expenses, including attorney and expert witness fees, arising from or connected with or alleged
to have arisen from or connected with, relating to, arising out of, or alleged to have resulted from
the acts, errors, mistakes, omissions, Work of Contractor, its agents, employees, or any tier of
Contractor's subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor's duty to defend,
hold harmless and indemnify City, elected officials, appointees, agents, and employees shall
arise in connection with any tortious claim, damage, loss or expense that is attributable to bodily
injury, sickness, disease, death, or injury to, impairment, or destruction of property including loss
of use resulting therefrom, caused by an Contractor's acts, errors, mistakes, omissions, or Work
in the performance of this Agreement including any employee of Contractor, any tier of
Contractor's subcontractor or any other person for whose acts, errors, mistakes, omissions,
Contractor may be legally liable.
9. ENFORCED Neither City nor Contractor, as the case
may be, shall be considered not to have performed its obligations under this Agreement in the
2
event of enforced delay(an "Enforced Delay") due to causes beyond its control and without its
fault or negligence or failure to comply with Applicable Laws, including, but not restricted to, acts
of God, fires, floods, epidemics, pandernics, quarantine, restrictions, embargoes, labor disputes,
and unusually severe weather or the delays of subcontractors or materialmen due to such
causes, acts of a public enemy, war, terrorism or act of terror(including but not limited to bio-
terrorism or eco-terrorism), nuclear rad(ation, blockade, insurrection, riot, labor strike or
interruption, extortion, sabotage, or similar occurrence or any exercise oft power of eminent
domain of any governmental body on behalf of any public entity, or a declaration of moratorium
or similar hiatus (whether permanent or temporary) by any publice ti irectly affecting the
Work. In no event will Enforced Delay include any delay resulting from unavailability for any
reason of labor shortages, or the unavailability fora reason of particular consultants,
subcontractors, vendors or investors desired by Contractor in connection with the Work.
Contractor agrees that Contractor alone will bear all risks of delay which are not Enforced
Delay. In the event of the occurrence of any such Enforced Delay, the time or times for
performance of the obligations of the Party claiming delay shall be extended for a period of the
Enforced Delay,, provided, however, that the Party seeking the benefit of the provisions of this
Section shall, within thirty(30) calendar days after such Party knows or should know of any
such Enforced Delay, first notify the other Party of the specific delay in writing and claim the
right to an extension fort period of the Enforced Delay; and provided further that in no event
shall a period of Enforced Delay exceed ninety (90) calendar as.
M GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE: The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be
governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws oft State of Arizona. Any action at
I aw or in equity brought by either Party for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for
in this Agreement, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in Pinal County, State of
Arizona. The Parties hereby waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such
proceeding to any other county. In the event either Party shall bring suit toenforce any term of
this Agreement or to recover any damages for and on account oft e breach of any term or
condition in this Agreement, it is mutually agreed that the prevailing party in such action shall
recover all costs including: all litigation and appeal expenses, collection expenses, reasonable
attorneys' fees, necessary witness fees and court costs to be determined by the court insuch
action.
11. INSURANCE: Contractor, at its own expense, shall purchase and maintain the
minimum insurance and other additional requirements set forth herein.
All insurance required herein shall be maintained in full force and effect until all or ors is
required to be performed under the terms of the Agreement is satisfactorily completed and
formally accepted; failure to do so may, at the sole discretion of the City constitute a material
breach of this Agreement.
Contractor's insurance shall be primary insurance as respect to City, and any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by City shall not contribute to it.
Any failure to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the insurance policies or any breach
of an insurance policy warranty shall not affect coverage afforded under the insurance policies
to protect it .
The insurance policies, except Workers Compensation, shall contain waiver of transfer rights of
recovery (subrogatioh) against City, its agents, officers, officials and employees for any claims
arising out of Contractor's acts, errors, mistakes, omissions, Work or services.
3
The insurance policies may provide coverage which contains deductibles or self-insured
retentions. Such deductible and/or self-insured retentions shall not be applicable with respect to
the coverage provided to City under such policies. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the
deductible and/or self-insured retention and City, at its option, may require Contractor to secure
payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions by a Surety Bond or an irrevocable and
unconditional letter of credit.
City reserves the right to request and to receive within ten (10) working days, certified copies of
any or all of the herein required insurance policies and/or endorsements. City shall not be
obligated, however, to review same or to advise Contractor of any deficiencies in such policies
and endorsements, and such receipt shall not relieve Contractor from, or be deemed a waiver of
City's right to insist on strict fulfillment of Contractor's obligations under this Agreement.
The insurance policies, except Workers Compensation, required by this Agreement, shall name
City, its agent, officers, officials and employees as additional insured parties.
REQUIRED COVERAGE
Commercial General Liability
Contractor shall maintain Commercial General Liability insurance with a limit of not less than
$1,000,000 for each occurrence with a $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate
and a $2,000,000 General Aggregate Limit. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury,
broad form property damage, personal injury, products and completed operations and blanket
contractual coverage including, but not limited to, the liability assumed under the indemnification
provisions of this Agreement which coverage will be at least as broad as Insurance Service
Office, Inc. Policy Form CG 00011-93 or any replacement thereof. In addition, automobile
liability coverage of at least $1 million per occurrence or a combined single limit of at least
$1,000,000 is required. The auto liability policy should contain endorsements for hired autos,
non-owned autos and scheduled vehicles, as applicable to the Contractor's business.
Such policy shall contain a severability of interest provision, and shall not contain a sunset
provision or commutation clause, nor any provision which would serve to limit third party action
over claims.
The Commercial General Liability additional insured endorsement shall be at least as broad as
the Insurance Service Office Inc.'s Additional Insured, Form CG 20101185, and shall include
coverage for Contractor's operations and products and completed operations.
If required by this Agreement, if Contractor sublets any part of the Work, services or operations,
Contractor shall purchase and maintain, at all times during prosecution of the or , services or
operations under this Agreement, City and Contractor's Protective Liability insurance policy for
bodily injury and property damage, including death, which may arise in the prosecution of the
Contractor's Work or operations under this Contract. Coverage shall be on an occurrence basis
with a limit not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, and the policy shall be issued by the same
insurance company that issues Contractor's General Liability insurance.
Workers Compensation
Contractor shall carry Workers Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by federal
4
and state statutes having jurisdiction of Contractor's employees engaged in the performance of
the Work; and Employer's Liability insurance of not less than $100,000 for each accident,
$100,000 disease for each employee, and $500,000 disease policy limit.
In case any or is subcontracted, Contractor will require subcontractor to provide Workers
Compensation and Employer's Liability to at least the same extent as required of Contractor.
Umbrella Policy
Contractor shall carry an umbrella policy with a limit not less than $5,000,000. The umbrella
policy shall cover claims that are uncovered by the primary policy and claims in excess of the
primary policy. The umbrella insurance policy shall cover those claims as primary insurance
and fill in the gaps in the underlying policies.
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
Prior to commencing Work under this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish the City with
Certificates of Insurance, or formal endorsements as required by Agreement, issued by
Contractor's insurer(s), as evidence that policies providing the required coverages, conditions
and limits required by this Agreement are in full force and effect.
In the event any insurance policies required by this Agreement are written on a "claims made"
basis, coverage shall extend for two (2) years past completion and acceptance of the
Contractors Work or services and as evidenced by annual Certificates of Insurance, to be filed
with the City Attorney of City.
If a policy does expire during the life oft Agreement, a renewal certificate must be sent to City
thirty(30) days prior tot expiration date. All Certificates of Insurance shall be identified with
Bid serial era title.
Insurance required herein shall not expire, be canceled, or materially changed without thirty(30)
days' prior written notice to City.
12. SUCCESSORS &ASSIGNS: Neither party tothis agreement shall assign the
obligations hereunder, nor shall the Contractor assign any monies due or to become due.
13. WRITTEN NOTICE: Written notice all be deemed to have been duly served if
delivered in person tot individual or member of the firm or entity, or to an office oft e
corporation for whom it was intended or if delivered at ors t registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, and first class postage prepaid tothe last business address known to them
who gives the notice.
14. SAFETY: Contractor and/or its subcontractors shall be solely responsible for jobs fe y
at all times.
15. RIGHTS & REMEDIES: The duties and obligations imposed by the contract documents
and the nights and remedies available hereunder shall be in addition to and not a limitation of
any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law, No action
or failure to act by City or Contractor shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of
them under the contract, nors all any action or failure to act constitute an approval of or an
5
acquiescence to any breaches hereunder except as may be specifically agreed to in writing.
16. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT: If, for any reason, the Contractor shall fall to fulfill in a
timely and proper manner it's obligations under the contract, or if the Contractor shall violate any
of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of the contract, the City shall thereupon have the
right to terminate the contract by giving written notice to the Contractor of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof.
Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages
sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of the contract by the Contractor.
The Parties may terminate the contract at any time by giving at least ninety(90) calendar days
Notice of Intent to Terminate. If the contract is terminated by the City as provided herein, the
Contractor will be paid for the time expended and expenses incurred up to the termination date.
17. APPEALS: All contractual grievances shall be submitted in writing to the City Manager
within five (5) calendar days after the difference of opinion or grievance occurs relating to any of
the provisions of the terms of this Agreement. Within five (5) calendar days of receiving a
written grievance, the City Manager shall respond in writing. The City Manager's decision shall
be final and binding, subject only to a further appeal in the Pinal County Superior Court pursuant
to A.R.S. § 12-901, of seq.
18. 'RECORDS: Records of Contractor's labor, payroll and other costs pertaining to this
Agreement shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and made available to City
for inspection on request. Contractor shall maintain records for a period of at least three (3)
years after termination of this Agreement, and shall make such records available during that
retention period for examination or audit by City personnel during regular business hours.
19. AMENDMENT: It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of the
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the
parties hereto, and that oral understandings or agreements not incorporated herein shall not be
binding on the parties.
20. SEVERABILITY: City and Contractor each believe that the execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement are in compliance with all applicable laws. However, in the
unlikely event that any provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable (or is
construed as requiring City to do any act in violation of any applicable laws, including any
constitutional provision, law, regulation, or city code), such provision shall be deemed severed
from this Agreement and this Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect; provided
that this Agreement shall retroactively be deemed reformed to the extent reasonably possible in
such a manner so that the reformed agreement(and any related agreements effective as of the
same date) provide essentially the same rights and benefits (economic and otherwise) to the
Parties as if such severance and reformation were not required. Unless prohibited by applicable
laws, the Parties further shall perform all acts and execute, acknowledge and/or deliver all
amendments, instruments and consents necessary to accomplish and to give effect to the
purposes of this Agreement, as reformed.
21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: This Agreement is subject to, and may be terminated by
City in accordance with, the provisions of A.R.S. § 38-511.
22. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence with respect to all provisions in this
6
Agreement, Any delay in performance by either Party all constitute a material breach of this
Agreement,
23. 'PROHIBITION TO CONTRACT WITH CONTRACTORS WHO ENGAGE IN BOYCOTT
OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL: The Parties acknowledge A.R.S.§ 35-393 through 35:393 0-3, as
amended, which forbids public entities from contracting with Contractors who engage in
boycotts of the State of Israel. Should Contractor, or its subcontractors, undart is Agreement
engage in any such boycott against the State of Israel, this Agreement is automatically
terminated. Any such boycott is a material breach of contract and will subject Contractor to
monetary damages.
COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS: Contractor understands and
acknowledges the applicability of the American with Disabilities Act, the Immigration Reform and
Control Act of 1986 and the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1989 tothe services performed under
this Agreement.
As required by A.R.S. §41-4401, Contractor hereby warrants its compliance with all federal
immigration laws and regulations that relate to its employees and A.R.S. § 23-214(A).
Contractor further warrants that after hiring an employee, Contractor will verify the employment
eligibility of the employee through the E-Verify program, If Contractor uses any subcontractors
in performance of services, subcontractors shall warrant their compliance with all federal
immigration laws and regulations that relate to its employees and A.R.S. § 23-214(A), and
subcontractors shall further warrant that after hiring an employee, such subcontractor verifies
the employment eligibility of the employee through the E-Verify program. A breach of this
warranty shall be deemed a material breach of the Agreement that is subject to penalties up to
and including termination of this Agreement. Contractor is subject to a penalty of$100 per day
for the first violation, $500 per day for the second violation, and $1,000 per day for the it
violation. City at its option may terminate this Agreemeta r the third violation. Contractor
shall not be deemed in material breach of this Agreement if the Contractor and/or
subcontractors establish compliance with the employment verification provisions of'Sections
274A and 274B of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act and the E-Verify requirements
contained in A.R.S. § 23-214(A). City retains the legal right to inspect the papers of any
Contractor or subcontractor employee who works under this Agreement to ensure that the
Contractor or subcontractor is complying with the warranty. Any inspection will be conducted
after reasonable notice and at reasonable times. If state law is amended, the Parties may
modify this paragraph consistent with state law.
7
IN WITNESS WHEREOFthe parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be signed by their
duly authorized representative as of this day of r G� , 21 .
CONTRACTOR:
CENTRAL A IOA COUNCIL ON
7DEaVLOPMENITAL l A ILITI S
Doug Bacon
Title: Executive Director
CITY:
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
n Arizona municipal corporation
y; Jeff Serdy
Title, City Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen Connelly
City Cierk
APPROVED A FORM:
Richard J. Stem
City Attorney
STATE OFCOUNTY of_ 1
1
t� i
The foregoing a subscribedan sworn fore this 1 ay of
Cb� 9� by u Bacon, a Executive Director en#ral izona
t 11 on evel p ental Disabilities.
eta
y Commission Expires
r>
MMY OMAN-CLOYD
(seal) r,
Naftepe tow"
My CqW&-Jvprn Mar 6,2
STATE F A A }
) ss.
COUNTY F l , y
The foregoing as subscribed and sworn to before me this 3,Aay
�-" 17 b Jeff er y, as Mayor f the City f padre-junction,ZIL
Arizona, an Arizona municipal corporation®
to Public
y Commission Expires: k
(seat)
1
F 1
n 1 1;
EXIBIT A
Transportation Costs
® TOTAL COST OF SERVICES: In accordance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, City shall compensate Contractor for senior transportation services in an
amount not to exceed $70,000 per year. This total is reliant on receiving all anticipated
gift and grant funds and program revenue to supplement the City's expenses.
2. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION COSTS (HOME TO MGC): Senior transportation from
clients' homes to and from the Multi-Generational Center("MGC") shall be charged at a
rate of$15.00 per client per round-trip. The route shall be coordinated by the Parties and
shall run Monday through Friday all days that the senior congregate meal program
operates. A minimum of five (5) clients shall be charged each day that transportation to
the MGC occurs.
3. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION COSTS (ADDITIONAL): Senior transportation to and
from medical and shopping trips shall be charged at a rate of$4.00 per it and $24.00
per hour for each trip. Trips shall be scheduled on a case-by-case basis with the
Contractor only as funds are available.
10
BETWEEN CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND CENTRAL FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
COUNCIL ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
THIS is made and entered into this
("the
Execution Date")
} between CITY OF
O ,
Arizonaan l corporation ("City"), CENTRAL ARIZONA COUNCIL ON
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, r profit corporation
("Contractor"), ll ivl fr t i r individually "Party".
PartiesRECITALS
The enteredi r rs ittransportationservices
t "Agreement")' _on August 28, 2017 for a year, and then withtic four
one-year renewal periods, havel end date of June 30, 2022.
B. Beyond that datei ill still need senior r ti ri s for
meals,_medical and shoppingoutings.
yearsC. The
i it a t r t r- t r ' r six
fiscal year 2027-2028.
D. Due to the increased cost of fuel and other inflationary r ti l
expenses the transportationcosts in Exhibit A need to be adjusted.
E. Formal procurement for the servicesprovided r this Agreementr
categorically
F. This Firstt forth the renewal terms.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, i si r i mutual promises containedherein
otherand good and valuablei r i , the receipt f which is
herebyl ,the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
Section : Prices shall be governedr attached Exhibit
"'Transportation Costs".
Sectionis Agreement shall be effectivebeginning
July 1, 2022 and shall remain in full force and effect through , with
additional one year renewal periodsi final end date of June 30, 2028,
subject to the early termination optionin § 16 jermination Contract
written notice t to terminate). H r, no later than 90 calendar days
before the end of the second and fourth year this it t is in effect . .,
April 2, 2024 and April 2, ), Contractor has the right to notifyi f
proposed ri increase. If ies agree to a 'price increase, s shall
writingbe reduced to r .
Should the negotiations fail, this First Amendment will be deemed terminated
immediately after June 30, 2024 or June 30, 2026, as applicable, without
necessity tic intent r l t either
Section : City and Contractor each bind themselves,
their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other Party
heretoto the partners, successors, ss legal representatives c
other Party in respect to all covenants, agreements and_ obligations t I I
r
lAgreement._ It contract shall assignr _swhole
delegatethe duties hereunder, l t writtent r r shall
Contractor assigni t to become due to it without the previous
written consent it .
Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and provisions
Agreementc t the Parties shall remain l force and effect.
IN WITNESS , the Parties have caused this Amendment to be
signedtheir duly authorizedrepresentatives the year'first above
written.
COUNCILCENTRAL ARIZONA
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES,
501 c) ) not for profit corporation
—D!2� . ~
Its: Executive Director
CITY:
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, an
Arizona municipal corporation
Walterl l
Its: jMayor
Jennifer Pena
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
R. Joel Stern
City Attorney
3
EXHIBIT A
Transportation Costs
1. TOTAL COST OF SERVICES: In accordance ith the terms and condition
of is Agreement, City shall compensate r t r for senior
transportation sri in amount not to , r r. is
total is reliant receivingall anticipated gift and grants and
program revenue to supplement the City's expenses.
2. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION COST(HOME TO m Senior transportation'
from - clients'clients' home to and from l i- r i l Center " " shall
be charged t a r 7.50 per client round trip. The route shall
coordinated ishall r r Fridayall the
days that the senior c r program A minimumof six
clients shall be charged_ each day that transportation to the MGC
occurs.
3. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION COSTS I ior transportation
to and from medical and shopping rishall be chargedt a rate of$6 per
mile r hour for each trip. Trips shall be scheduled
case basisi t r only as funds are available.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES S AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND CENTRAL. ARIZONA
COUNCIL ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered Into this day of
2024, ("the Execution Date") by and between CITY OF AP'ACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, an Arizona municipal corporation ("City"'), and CENTRAL
ARIZONA COUNCIL ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, a 501 c not-for-
profit corporation ("Contractor"), sometimes each collectively referred to as the
"Parties"' or individually as the `Party".
RECITALS
A. The Parties entered into an agreement t for senor transportation
services (the "Agreement" can August 28, 2017 for one year, and then with
automatic four 4 one-gear renewals, had a final contract end data of June 30,
2022
B. The Parties entered into a First Amendment beginning on July 1, 2022,
ending on June 30, 2028 with one-year automatic renewal options being
exercised.
C. Since 2023, fuel and other inflationary operational expenses Increased
significantly which the Parties agree need adjustment.
[ . Formal procurement for the services provided under this Agreement
are categorically exempted under A.J.C.C,, Vol. 1, Art. 5-7.
E. This Second Amendment sets forth the above-noted terms;
AG_REEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which
is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
Section 2. Pl_ICFS. Prices stall be governed under attached Exhibit A
"Transportation Costs", for general cost of services, senior transportation costs
(home to multi-generational center)and additional medicall"sho ping trips.
Section 4. QQ` TI At T TERMS. This agreement shall be effective
beginning on July 1, 2024 and shall remain in full force and effect through June
30, 2025, with five tS additional one-year renewal periods with the final end date;
of June 30, 2028, subject to the early termination option in Section 16,
Termination of Contract(90 day written notice of Intent to terminate);
Except as expressly amended herein, all ether terms and provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the Agreement is
terminated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be
signed by their duty authorized representatives as of the day and year first
above written.
CENTRAL ARIZONA COUNCIL ONDEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, a
Its;
CI
CITY OF APAC IE JUNCTION, ARIZONA,
an Arizona municipal corporation
By: Walter"ChI "Wilson
Its: ae
ATTEST:
Jennifer Pena
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
<�e-5-43-24 —
R.Joel Stern
City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
TRANSPORTATION COSTS
. TOTAL COST OF SERVICES In accordance with the terns and conditions
of this Agreement, City sell compensate Contractor for the senior
transportation services in an amount not to exceed $ 70,000 per year. This
total is reliant on receiving all anticipated d gift and grant funds and
program revenue to supplement the City's expenses.
2< SENIOR TRANSPORTATION COST (HOME TO MGC): Senior
transportation from client's home to and from theMulti-Generational'
Center " C" shall be charged at a flat rate o $ 40 per day, for up to 18
clients, The route shall be coordinated by the Parties and shall run
Monday through Friday for all days the senior's congregate areal program
operates. Special routes requested to run Saturday or Sunday will be
champed at a flat rate of 20 per day, for up to 18 clients
. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION COST (Group shopping, food boxes, or other`
extended days): Will be charged at an additional $ 0 per clay (Monday
through Friday),for up to 18 clients:
4. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION COST (Additional): Senior transportation for
clients I to 2 clients) from their home and from medical or individual
shopping trips shall be charged at a rate of$8.00 per mile and $25.00 per
hour rounded to the next 1/4 hour)for each trip. "Trips shall be scheduled on
a case-by-case basis with the contractor only as fonds are available,
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.5.
File ID: 24-416
Sponsor: Michael Pooley Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Consideration of approval of Resolution No. 24-20, authorizing the City of Apache Junction to
enter into an intergovernmental agreement with Apache Junction Unified School District#43
for grant-funded School Resource Officers.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
Apache Junction Police Department
Memorandum
Date: May 7, 2024
To: Mayor Chip Wilson and the City Council
From: Chief Michael Pooley
Subject: Resolution 24-20 - Revision to the Intergovernmental Agreement
established with Apache Junction Unified School District.
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The Apache Junction Police Department (AJPD) is seeking approval for
Resolution 24-20, an Intergovernmental Agreement to prolong the presence of
School Resources Officers at the Apache Junction Unified School District
(AJUSD) and to expand staffing at Desert Vista Elementary and Four Peaks
Elementary Schools.
The Arizona Department of Education has granted funding of $139,671 .89 to
cover the salaries and benefits of these officers.
ELEMENTARYINTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
AND APACHE JUNCTION
I I l T l
RELIEF { "
SCHOOLFUNDED RESOURCE,OFFICERJUNCTION I L
HIS L 'Agreement") is made as of
the 6ay of t tIv t " y r n CITY OF
{
4CTION�
l l lcorporation ("City")
JUNCTIONl 1 L DISTRICT #43, a political subdivision of the Statef
Arizona, on behalf of " Junction High School" ("School"). City and School are
sometimes referred to her In collectively as t " I ,#or individually as a'Party,"
RECI --
A. School desires City to assign a policer to School to performI
resource r r " " to providel r s In § 5 of this
Agreement, and City is willingto assign a policeofficer to School for such purpose
under the terms and conditionsf this Agreement.
B. The Parties are authorizedjand 11-952 to enter into
this Agreement,
NOW, THEREFORE, in considerationthe foregoingRecitals and the mutual
promises and covenantsset forth herein, n for other consideration, the receipt
adequacy of which Is hereby acknowledged, the Partiest l
t� s. City shall assign one policeofficer to School seven (7) calendar days
prior to the commencement of the school year projected to be startingr about
July 25, 2022 and July , 2023 for the first two years this r nt is in effect
until the end of the correspondingl years projected to be ending
2022 and y , 2024 respectively, to performduties at Apache Junction
High School at 2525 SouthIronwood Drive,Apache Junction,
Termination. This Agreement shall commence on the Effectivet
and shall continue until May , 2024, however, either Party may terminate this
Agreement for any reason with thirty calendardays' prior writtentic t
t other y first class I 1, postage _prepaid, addressed to the
other Party as setf In§t I of this Agreement.
3. BAkLigaghig of Parties. City shall have the status of an independent contractor
for purposes of this Agreement.This r t is not intended
A)HS SRO IGA 2 22-2 2 -Page I of 12
to and will not constitute, create, give rise r otherwise recognize a joint
venture, partnershi ; or formal usin s association or organization of any kind
between the Parties, n the rights and obli ti s of the Parties shall only be
those r sl set forth in this Agreement. The Parties agree that no person
supplied y School to accomplishthe goals of this Agreement is a City employee.
The assigned li be consideredn employee of Cityn ll be
subject to its control and supervision.The assignedill be subject to current
procedures in effect for City policeofficers, Including att n ll mandated
training ti to maintain state is r certification, Theassigned
SRO shall fulfill ti s a law enforcement officer as certifiedy the Artzona
Police Officers Standardsr i in 'A *.School shall not
Interfere it the assignedduff es as-a sworn law enforcement officer.
City understands that School is responsible for s of students an
campus duringcurriculum hours. if School receives information t the assigned
SRO y have engagedin unprofessional, illegal, or immoral conduct, School
ill immediately r vi information to City. If City receives- information
fo tic from
any crediblesource Indicatingt t t assigned have n i
unprofessional, illegal, r Immoral conduct that would affect the officer's ability to
safely and/or professionally performi for School, City will immediately
provide uc information, as all y law,to School,
f any allegedunprofessional, Illegal, or immoral ct might affect the
SRO's ability to safely and/or professionally performduties for School, City will
immediately r ov the from col to allow Cityand/or School t
investigate the allegations. City agrees to temporarily assign a_ replacement
police officer ch of in this situation and if a replacement r cannot be
provided, c of will be credited for each day an officerIs not assigned to the
campus. School, at its sole isc do ¢_ y refuse the i n t of any officer
who has previously removed from School because of allegations of
unprofessional, illegal,1, r immoral nduct.
School shall reimburse City for the costsf ' compensation for: days
School is in session and theis present at l; _when the SRO is not at
the School u to an off-campus activity at School's request; n SRO Is
involved In activity stemming ti taken by the officer while in service of
School, including n nc t court; is working
alternative work schedule as r upon y City School. it i responsible
for t _costs _f 's compensation for all other hours of work performed
a. Cost of r nticl ul urs; School agrees to pay City
One HundredFifty SevenT s n ine Hundred Dollars and Ninetyi
Centsfor Fiscal Year In consideration for the
services provided by City as set forth in Section 5 below.
b. vmust k approval from ool principal, or the
principal's dsi ns rt appropriate;city policedepartment supervisor
far workingI overtime
, those r pertaining to the
School, its students, or its l I shall pay one hundred percent
f:any SRO overtime s the result of SRO-related functions.
City shall pay one hundredr tt o of any SROovertimethat result
from It -rl tod activities(I e.,those mattersthat do not involve the School,it
students, or its employees). The SRO andCity shall make everyreasonable
effort to ensurethat the SRO doesot Incur overtime costs in any given week, }
c. Paymentt y t to City from o f is due within thirty
{ calendar days of the School'srclt of a monthlyItemized invoice.School
agrees to pay Interest ("late } In the amount of ten percent t
annum on any balance that remains unpaidmore than fifteen
calendar days after the duet City may, at its discretion, waive late
fees on a case-by-casesis<
d. Budget. Each Party will establish an int in a budget according to Its
established rules and regulations.
5. ' ss onsi illti Is
. The .SRO shall have the oll ire r o si iliti s:
i. Establish and maintain a professional working relationship wit School
officials, Including but not limited to assistingIn repetitive truancy tt r
that become moretime consuming for School's i i ti
Ii. Provide appropriatepolice and nfor nt services at School.
Ill. Work cooperatively with School administrators and parents to Identify
students exhibiting high truancy rates.
iv. Investigate all reported child abuse incidents Within the School's
premises.
v. Contact the parent or r i f students who have not "provided School
with proof of identification in accordance with * . . .
A, Prepare and maintain such records of their activities as arerequired y the
operational needs of the Apache Junction Police Department.
b. An SRO shall use goodi to achieve the following s:
i. Work cooperatively withc o l administrators to establish a h effective
administrativereview of truancy repetitive Incidents ith the objective
of reducing truancy.
H. Refer juveniles r their parents/guardlans to appropriatesocial service
agencies for assistance when a need is determined.
ill. Instruct ch cl administrators and faculty member in.,
identification of abused or neglected children; (b) the reporting of abuse or
neglect; c the actionsthat can be taken to prevent further`abuse or
neglect.
iv# Provide educational programs in truancy, abuse, or any other topic
mutually agreed upon by the Parties In writing.
vim Take appropriate steps, including enforcement and reporting acte ,
consistent with a policeofficer's u , upon the discovery of child u ,
drug use, r any other crime.
c, The SRO, at his or her discretion, may perform the following" additional t sk$
to enhance school efficiency:
1. Plan School security improvements.
i. Prepare law-related educ tion lessons.
iii, Develop collaborations wit a ity resources, identifying servis s
offered that could benefit students.
iv. Conduct School safety s s
va Plan In-service training.
A. Collaborate withSchool administration to analyzecriminal Incident reports
and disciplinary records s a means of Identifying patterns and developing
strategies to address problems.
vi .Work with ni - sed and youth recreational leadership
development ctiviti s that complement and reinforce Schocl safety
priorities.
viii, Attend training niti_ ,
Time andPlace f Perfor
City it ensure t i a III provide the services under this ,
Agreement in a full-time, f hour a week capacity l is in
session s School requests urin ut® f-s sic breaks. The assigned
officer will wear uniforms as authorized by City.
b. The "s activities will be restrictedto the assignedl grounds except
for:
If Follow-up home visits when needed as a result of School-related matt rs.
ii. Incentive rc r approved in writing (for example, by it n
the policei supervisor n s 's principal, or the principal's
designee.
ill. In response to off campus, but School-related,criminal activity.
iva Attendance at off-campus events or meetings at School's request.
. Attendance at training.
vi. In response to emergency police activities,
li. As directedy any police department supervisor.
All.During days that School Is not In session, the assigned SRO shall perform
is or r regular duties at a duty station t r in y City.
Schools onsi it ti
a. School will provide the SRO with an office at School and such equipment and
office supplies as is necessary for performance of the dutiesnoted in"this
Agreement, including chair,telephone, computer
il linkages,and filing c l of being secured,
b. Upon termination, all property or equipment used by the Partiesin the
performance f their responsibilities n r this i shall remain the
propertyof the Party that purchasedthe property or equipment.
laWLM929M. By mutual agreement, the Parties y meet from time to time
for purposes of discussing the status and conduct of the workinperformed
under this Agreement and addressingany problems tt have come to the
Parties' attention and this Views ast c such r l s may be l ,
including amendi r ' conditions of this Agreement.
ntir r nt. This Agreement and any attachments represent tir
agreement between the Parties and supersedeprior negotiations,
representations, r agreements, either express or implied, ri n or oral. It i
mutually n rst cd and agreedthat no alterationr variation of the terms
conditions of thi r nt shall be valid ! ss made in writing and signed y the
Partiesrt . Wriften andin n is shall automatically
of the supportinga nt , and shall supersede any inconsistent provision
therein; r vi , however, that any apparent inconsistency shall be resolved,
possible, by construingprovisions as mutually complementary
supplementary. All amendments to this r nt must be in writing
approved the city council and school's board.
_
11.Notices. Except as otherwise required , any notice it r permitted
iin-der this Agreement shall be in writing n shall be givenpersonal delivery, or
y deposit in the United States mail, certified r registered, return receipt
requested, st c prepaid, addressed to the s at their respective
addresses setf l , or ats thr address' as a Party may designatein
writing r t to the terms ofthis section,
city:_ ApacheJunction lic Department
Attn: i f Police
300 E.Superstition Blvd,Apache
Junction,Arizona 85119
With a copy to: City of Apache Junction
Attn: Attorney
300 E. Superstition Blvd.Apache
Junction,Arizona 85119
School: Apache Junction Unified School District
Attn: School Superintendent
1575 W. Southern Ave.
Apache Junction,Arizona 85119
With a copy t ; Apache Junction i i District
Chief Financial Officer1 T
SouthernW.
Apache Junction,Arizona 85119
12.Fin r ri tiBackr a k. l represents warrantsthat the
meetsSIR all fingerprinting an round check clearancesr AZPOST
requirements to serve as o peace officer in the t f Arizona.
1 l r i�tir t � The Parties warrant their respective li
with all federal immigration laws andregulations relating to their respective
employees ri h Party respectively warr is its respective lwith
A.R.S. - 1 y breach of the warrantiesunder this r r ill be
deemed a material breach of the Agreement and Is u act to penaltiesup to and
including termination of the Agreement,
1 .j2v ili . The Parties each believethat the execution, delivery
performance f this r e nt are in compliance withall applicable laws,_
However, in the unlikely event that any provisionf this r nt is declared
i + r unenforceable (or is construedrequiring i to do any act in violation
f any applicable laws, including any constitutional provision, law, regulation, or
i ' _ t such provision shall be deemedsevered from this Agreement and this
Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force neffect; provided that this
Agreement shall retroactively reformed the extent reasonably
possible in such a manner so that t reformedagreement herrelated
agreements effectivef t tprovide essentially the same rights
benefits (economic and otherwise) to the Partiesif such severance
reformation r not required. nl ro i it y applicable laws, the Parties
further shall perform all acts andcut 4_ acknowledge r deliver all
amendments, instruments consents necessary to accomplishto give
effect to the purposesf this r nt, as reformed.
1 . v rni n rn a The terms conditions f this
Agreement ail be governedy and interpreted in accordance with the laws of
the Statef Arizona. Any action at law or in equity brought by either Party for the
purpose enforcing right or rights ri for in this Agreement shall be tried
in a courtf competent jurisdiction in Pinal County, Arizona. The Partieshereby
waive all provisions of law providing for a changef venue in such proceeding to
any other county, In the event
either Party shall bring suit to enforce any terms Agreement or to recover
any damages for and on account of the breachf any term or condition in this
Agreement, it is mutually agreed that the prevailing in such action shall
recover ll costs including reasonable ttorn fees to be t r in y the court
in such action.
16. uc sso i rat l t ligations and rights created i
this Agreement are bindingon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties 'n
their successors, assigns and legal representatives. Neit y may assign,
sublet or delegate the duties r n r, without' the prior written approval of the
other Party. Such successor or assignee shall assume, in writing, all duties
obligations hereunder of the prior party and shall further agree to be bound _n
t ,f lty performthe terms of this r t.
Cancellationfor Conflict f Interest, City col c t this
r o nt is subject
tocancellation
nc ll tiny either Party pursuant to the provisionsf
ARS. § -
18. on r ri tion. Each Party recognizes that the performance y either Party
under this Agreement y t o tappropriation of funds to r by
that y, Shouldeither Party fall to appropriate the necessaryfunds, that Party
y terminate this Agreement as stated herein without further duty or obligation.
Each Party agrees to give `c to the other Party as soon as reasonably pos i t
after the unavailability of funds comes to the ,s attention,
a In ornnifi tion and--lns-gran M.
a. To the extent permitted by 1 , c In tutor) covenants n
agrees t fully indefend and holdharmless the other Party
In omn , its electedn ont officers, ply s, _and agents from
and against any andall suits, actions, legal or administrative
claims, demands or s o in r naturerelating tot is Agreement,
including oy and expert Witnessfees, which, are the result f any act or
omission of the Indemnifying i r employees, contractees,
agents, and anyoneacting under its direction or control, th r reckless,
intentional or negligent, In connection it r incident to this Agreement. If
any action or claim shall be brought or asserted against either Party or its
directors, officers, agents, t r employees for which indemnify y be
sought from either Party, the Parties shall promptly notify one another in writing.
The noticed Party shall,-within t` 1 working ys of receiving ch notice,
assume the defensethereof, and the payment of all expenses, Including ny
attorney fees andall court costs isshall be paidIncurred.
b. Each Party warrants that it is properly and adequately Insured for the activities
and performances provided is Agreement and agrees to maintain
such insurance for the duration of the Agreement. it is understood
that either Party may elect to self-insureobtain insurance r h a pooling
agreement ith other governmental entities against any or all of the risk
related to this Agreement.
c. This section shall survive the expiration or early termination of this
Agreement,
20.Workers'49 ns tire. An employee of either Party shall be deemed to be an
employee" f both public agencies it r pursuant to this t
solely forpurposes q n t ArizonaCompensation
laws. I y rRshall be solely liable for any workers' compensation
benefits, which may accrue. Each Party shall post a noticet to the
provisions f - in substantially the following form:
"All employees are hereby further notified that they may be required
to workr the jurisdiction r control of or withinthe jurisdictional
boundaries f another public agency pursuant to an
intergovernmental r snt or contract, and under such
circumstances they r laws of Arizona to be
employees f both public agencies for ur s s of workers'
compensation."
21. : llv Education Rights and ri cy 1in nth Parties will ensure
that the dissemination and disposition of educational records complies t all times
with the Family Educational Rights andPrivacy Act of 1974 s nt
amendments thereto.
22.Time Is off_the Essence. Time is of the essenceit s ct to all provisions in this
Agreement. Any delayIn performance by either Party shall constitute t
breach f this Agreement.
23. r ibition to rnnfrgrt t ti s c n in tt f t t t f Israel.
The Parties acknowledge A.R.S. 35-393 through , as "
which forbids public entities from n c`ng with entities who engagein boycotts of
the Stateof Israel. Should either Party engagen any such boycott against the
Statef Israel, this Agreement shall be deemed automatically terminated by
operation f law. Any such boycottits a material breach of contract.
WITNESS
IN WHEREOF, the Parties havecut this Agreement as of the date first
set forth v .
aCHOOL:
{
UNIFIED DISTRICT
g Chelseally
Its: District Board President
ATTEST:
Board
I F
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, I
Arizonau l l I corporation
t
w Walter"'Chip"Wil n Its:
Mayor
0ark
r ity
1
STATE OF ARIZONA
COUNTY OF L��W ss
he 16 sari before this y f
tk4 rogol"g was
by hA Connolly, rPresident f theApache
nti ifi I itrit
E A, Rfi G
of lip Pu a :
issia 5fit2
My
Commission Expires: s ,.EX0V*% K20,202Z
)ssSTATE OF ARIZONA
COUNTY OF PINAL
fir i rl n r tbefore me this day of
Mayor of Cityh nti n,
rig n , rig n ii I c ti nacknowledged that he signedthe
fir i nt nt I f i .
Notaryl rrI
jenniferDPena
My Commission it
COUNSEL L AS TO FORM:
I have read this Agreement and have determinedis in proper
form Is red Into withinthe powersf and authoritygranted r the laws
f the StateArizona,
i try _ __...Attorney,
States
i have read thisdetermined r t is in proper
form and Is t r into r authority r t the laws
f the Statef Arizona,
City Attorney, Richard J. Stem _ t
12
JunctionApache
July 7, 2022
Mayor Chip Wilson and CityCouncil
From: Chief Michael Pooley
Resolution 22-2 , Apache Junction Unified School District #43 _ IGA
Agreement
Apache Junction Police Department ) has been asked to partner with the Apache
Junction Unified School District #43 J 3) in providing them with e school resource
officer )for the Apache Junction High School with the position being filled an AJPD
sworn police officer. The position Vill be 100 funded (salary n ne ) by a grant
secured by AJUSD for two ) years. AJUSD #43 has committed to pay for any training the
officer will need in order to fulfill the requirements of the grant,
Resolution No. 22-26 which includes n intergovernmental agreement between the City
Apache Junction and AJUSD , AJPD requests council approval of this partnership, The
assigned officer would perform the following:
• Provide law enforcement and police service to the students, administration, campus
and the areas in the immediate t proximity tote school, will take reports, investigate
criminal incidents and enforce state and city ordinances.
• Regularly patrol the campus to deter criminal or delinquent activities; monitor uniform
crime reportingstatistics I ) and act as a'liaison between AJPD and AJHS and
• Develop and foster a partnership with AJUSD administrators in order to create
secure and safe learning environment for students; assist school administrators to
enforce their own policies and procedures; protect school administrators whie
weapons and/or illegal drug searches areconducted.
• e present in situations whore a student's emotional state may present a risk to other
students and staff members; and-work In tandem with school administrators in
emergency crisis planning and facility security.
• e a highly visible participant within the school community y planning, regularly
attending and participating in school-related eventsand functions; and build working
relationships with the school's staff n renth Cher organizations.
• Develop n teach classes with an emphasis on the positive role of police officers in
society and other law-related education topics.
• Work with ca e is advisors and behavioral coaches in providing outside agency
student services.
• Interact it students in the classroom and in the common areas with the intention of
promoting law enforcement as a profession and to serve as a positive role model to
students,
RESOLUTION NO. 24-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION TO ENTER INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT WITH APACHE JUNCTION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
#43 FOR GRANT-FUNDED SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS .
WHEREAS, in 2022, through an Intergovernmental Agreement
("IGA") , the City of Apache Junction (`City") and the Apache
Junction Unified School District #43 ("School") , entered into
two separate agreements (the "2022 agreements") wherein the City
assigned an Apache Junction Police Department ("AJPD") peace
officer to serve as a school resource officer ("SRO") to the
Apache Junction High School and Cactus Canyon Junior High School
campuses to assist in the development and implementation of a
school safety and educational program; and
WHEREAS, in 2022, as per the IGA, the term of the 2022
agreements ends on May 31, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City and the School desire to continue their
community partnership by entering into an amendment to the 2022
agreements for all SRO issues (hereinafter referred to as the
"First Amendment" as set forth in Attachment A) ; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R. S . §§ 11-952 (A) , 15-155 and 15-
342 (13) , cities and schools may enter into IGAs with each other
for joint or cooperative activities; and
WHEREAS, the proposed First Amendment to the 2022
agreements set forth in Attachment A has been developed to allow
the City and the School to continue their community partnership.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS :
1) The council hereby approves, and the mayor is authorized to
execute the First Amendment to the SRO IGA as more fully set
forth in Attachment A.
2) The chief of police is also authorized to participate in
and designate staff to fulfill all the duties of the SRO
program.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-20
PAGE 1 OF 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF , 2024 .
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF , 2024 .
WALTER "CHIP" WILSON
Mayor
ATTEST:
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RICHARD J. STERN
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 24-20
PAGE 2 OF 2
ATTACHMENT A
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION AND APACHE JUNCTION
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT#43 FOR PROVIDING SCHOOL
RESOURCE OFFICERS
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into this day of
, 2024, ("the Execution Date"), by and between the CITY OF APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, an Arizona municipal corporation ("City"), and APACHE
JUNCTION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT#43, a political subdivision of the State of
Arizona, (the "District" or "School"), sometimes collectively referred to as the
"Parties" or individually as a "Party".
RECITALS
A. In July 2022, the Parties entered into two separate but similarly-worded
agreements (the "2022 agreements") wherein the City assigned an Apache
Junction Police Department("AJPD") officer to serve as a school resource officer
("SRO") to the Apache Junction High School and Cactus Canyon Junior High
School campuses to assist in the development and implementation of a school
safety and educational program.
B. The term of the 2022 agreements ends on May 31, 2024.
C. The Parties desire to continue their community partnership by creating
one comprehensive agreement modeled after the 2022 agreements for all SRO
issues and it shall be referred to as the "First Amendment" to the 2022
agreements.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend the 2022 agreements in this
First Amendment as follows:
1) Section 1, Services, shall include the following eligible school locations
for an AJPD SRO:
a. Apache Junction High School, 2525 S. Ironwood Dr., Apache Junction,
AZ
b. Cactus Canyon Junior High School, 801 W. Southern Ave., Apache
Junction, AZ
c. Desert Vista Elementary School, 3701 E. Broadway Ave., Apache
Junction, AZ
1
d. Four Peaks Elementary School, 1785 N. Idaho Rd., Apache Junction,
AZ
e. Superstition Mountain Elementary School, 550 S. Ironwood Dr.,
Apache Junction, AZ
f. Peralta Trail Elementary School, 10965 E. Peralta Rd., Gold Canyon,AZ
2) Section 2, Term and Termination. This Agreement shall commence on the
Effective Date and shall continue until June 30, 2029 with automatic one-
year renewals for up to five additional years through 2034, however,
either Party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon thirty (30)
calendar days'written notice to the other Party by first class certified U.S.
mail, addressed to the other Party as set forth in § 11 of this Agreement.
3) Section 4(a), Costs and Payments.
a) Cost of Wages for Anticipated Scheduled Hours. District agrees to
pay City One Hundred Thirty Nine Thousand Six Hundred Seventy
One Dollars and Seventy Nine Cents ($139,671.79) plus an increase
of up to 10%per year for each SRO who provides services each fiscal
year as more fully set forth in Section 5 below, however, the Parties
acknowledge that such payment obligation is subject to and
conditioned upon School receiving state School Safety Grant
funding each fiscal year this Agreement is in effect.
4) Existing Section 5, SRO's Responsibilities and Goals, shall include the
following new subsections:
(vii) The SRO will partner with School Administrator and the SRO
supervisor to meet the needs of the campus for law-related
education ("LRE"). SROs shall provide LRE instruction as a
prevention activity and opportunity to build relationships. The
development and implementation of LRE must be based on a
needs assessment. The LRE may be provided virtually, but the
LRE reports shall be detailed and presented as per the School
Safety Grant.
(viii) Complete required training and reports as dictated by the
School Safety Grant.
5) Existing Section 7(a), Time and Place of Performance is amended as
follows and renumbered as Section 6(a), with existing Section 7(b) being
renumbered as new Section 6(b):
(a) City shall assign SRO to District beginning on July 25, 2024, except
that the Parties shall have flexibility in actual start dates in order to
build in SRO prep time before students are physically present on
2
campus for the new school year. City will ensure that the assigned
SRO will provide the services under this Agreement in a full-time,
forty (40) hour a week capacity when school is in session and as
District requests during out-of-session breaks. The SRO will wear
uniforms as authorized by City.
6) Existing Section 8, School Responsibilities, is renumbered as Section 7.
7) Existing Section 9, Status Meetings, is renumbered as Section 8.
8) Existing Section 10, Entire Agreement, is renumbered as Section 9.
9) New Section 10, Nondiscrimination. Both Parties shall comply with all
applicable state and federal employment laws, rules, regulations and
executive orders that all persons shall have equal access to employment
and educational opportunities regardless of race, color, religion, sex,
age, national origin, disability, veteran's status, political affiliation,
and/or genetic code and shall comply with Executive Order 2009-09.
10) New Section 24, Retention and Inspection of Records. The Parties shall
retain and shall contractually require each other to retain, all books,
accounts, reports, files and other records relating to the performance of
the Agreement for a period of five (5) years after the completion of
termination of the Agreement and to make such documents open to the
inspection and audit at reasonable times.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First Amendment as
of the date first set forth above.
SCHOOL:
APACHE JUNCTION UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
#43, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona
By: Dena Kimble
Its: District Board President
CITY:
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, an
Arizona municipal corporation
By: Walter "Chip" Wilson
Its: Mayor
3
ATTEST:
Jennifer Pena
City Clerk
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me this day
Of , 2024 by Dena Kimble, District Board President of the Apache
Junction Unified School District#43.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF PINAL )
The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me this day
Of , 2024 by Walter "Chip" Wilson, Mayor of City of Apache
Junction, Arizona, an Arizona municipal corporation, who acknowledged that he
signed the foregoing instrument on behalf of City.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
5
COUNSEL APPROVAL AS TO FORM:
I have read this Agreement and have determined such Agreement is in proper
form and is entered into within the powers of and authority granted under the laws
of the State of Arizona.
Renee Osipov Date
District Attorney
Richard J. Stern Date
City Attorney
6
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.6.
File ID: 24-432
Sponsor:Ted Wolff Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Consideration of approval of Resolution 24-21, adopting the budget for Fiscal Year
2024-2025 for Streetlight Improvement District No. 2021-02 Coyote Crossing subdivision.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
Public Works Department
City of Apache Junction
p
Home of the Superstition Mountains
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 8, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
THROUGH: Bryant Powell, City Manager
Ted Wolff, Public Works Director
FROM: Emile Schmid P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: Streetlight Improvement District ("SLID") 2021-02-Coyote Crossing Subdivision
Resolution 24-21 Adopting the SLID Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
REQUEST
Consideration and approval of the Budget Resolution for SLID No. 2021-02- Coyote Crossing
subdivision.
BACKGROUND
The creation of a Streetlight Improvement District ("SLID") is a means whereby the electrical expenses
of streetlights are paid by the levy and collection of taxes based on the number of properties within
the SLID. SLIDs are created by the submittal of a formation petition, and the subsequent approval of
three separate resolutions: 1) the intent to form a SLID; 2) ordering the installation of streetlights
within the SLID, and 3) setting forth the initial annual SLID budget.
The 12 residential parcels of the Coyote Crossing subdivision have been approved and the final plat has
been recorded. Previously, Resolution 21-08 Intent to Form Streetlight Improvement District and
Resolution 21-16 Ordering the Installation of Streetlights within the SLID were approved by council
(March 16, 2021 and April 20, 2021 respectively) when all 12 lots of the Coyote Crossing subdivision
were owned by SIG-AZ who on October 16, 2020, submitted to the city a unanimous petition for the
formation of the SLID along with an exhibit showing the boundary of the SLID. The above budget
resolution will be on the consent agenda at the May 21, 2024, city council regular meeting for final
approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests mayor and city council approve Resolution 24-21 on consent agenda at the
May 21, 2024 council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED
This item will be for consideration and approval.
575 E. Baseline Avenue, Apache Junction, AZ 85119
Tel (480) 982-1055 + FAX (480) 983-5872
RESOLUTION LUT'I NO. 24-21
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR O S CITY COUNCIL CST` THE CITY
F APAC E JUNCTION, A :IZONA, ADOPTING THE FINAL BUDGET
FOR THE STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT RIC""T 2 21 02
CCYC E CROSSING, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 - 2025 BEGINNING
JULY 1, 2524 AND ENDING JU E 30 2025 AND LEVYING UPON
THE PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT CAE BY AN EQUAL APPORTIONMENT
OF THE TAXES NEEDED TO PAY THE EXPENSES SES SET FORTH Its THE
BUDGET.
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Arizona
Revised Statutes ("A EmS ") 45- 1 , the Street Lighting
Improvement District 202'1.-02-Coyote Crossing (the "District") , the
mayor and l council received the proposed District budget riot
to May 21 2024; and
WHEREAS, notice of the hearing on the statements and estimates
of expenses of the District (the "Budget") was duly published and
the hearing conducted, All as required by laws and
WHEREAS, the mayor and city council intend to adopt the fiscal
year 2024 2025 final budget for the District; and
WHEREAS, upon fixing, levying and assessing the amount to be
raised by ad valorem taxes on all the real and personal property
in the District or apportioned equally upon the number and
classification of properties within the District, the city clerk
is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution
to the assessor, recorder and board of" supervisors of Pin al County,
Arizona, with a request to collect such taxes in the same manner
s general city taxes
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF A ACHE JUNCTION ARIZO A, AS FOLLOWS:
1 End et Ado to ti The District budget attached hereto in
Exhibit A in the amount of $226.08 is hereby adopted as the budget
of the District for fiscal year 2024 - 2025 .
2. Amount to be Raised Taxes The amount of the District
budget set forth in section 1 of this resolution is hereby fixed,
levied and assessed as the amount to be raised by the leery of ad
valorem taxes on all the real and personal property in the District
or through are equal apportionment of taxes based d on the number and
classification of properties withi the District . 'There is e.reby
levied on each one hundred dollars ( I0g) of assessed value on all
RESOLUTION NO. 24- 1
PACE 1 CE 3
property, both real and personal within the District not exempt
from taxation, a tax rare sufficient {riot greater than one dollar
and twenty cents ( 14 2 ) to provide a fund for the annual expenses
of the SAID, said amount to be collected in the same manner as the
collection of general city taxes.
2, No Invalidation of Proceedinas. No irregularity in the
fixing, levying or assessing the amount to be raised by ad valorem
tames or emission in the same, or irregularity of any kind in any
proceedings shall invalidate such proceeding or invalidate any
action to collect such taxes, including the conveyance of title b
any tax deed, nor shall any failure or neglect of any officer or
officers to perform any of the duties assigned to him or to then
on the day within time specified will be an invalidation of any
proceedings or of any action to collect such taxes or affect the
validity of the assessment of the budget amount and levy of taxes
or of the judgment or sale by which the collection of the same may
be enforced, or in any manner affect the lien upon such property
for the delinquent annual tees unpaid thereon, and no overcharge
as to part of the taxes or of costs shall invalidate an
proceedings for collecting of the taxes or the foreclosure, and
all, acts of officers de facto shall be valid as if performed by
officer de jure.
4 . tldtice of L . The city clerk and city finance director
are each authorized and directed to provide the certified duplicate
copies of this resolution and such other documents as may be
necessary to cause Pinal County to luny, assess and collect the
amounts described herein from ad valorem property takes, including
the budget, to the Final County Board of Supervisors, County
Assessor and County °Treasurer$
s Conflicting Resolutions Re ea d> All resolutions and
parts of resolutions in conflict are hereby repealed.
PASSED 7D ADOPTED BY THE MAYORAND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF 2
Walter "Chip" Wilson
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 24-21
PAGE 2 OF
ATTEST:
JENNIFER PEN
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
RICHARD J. STERN
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO, 24-21
PAGE 3 CAE°
EXHIBIT
City of Apache Junction
Street Light Improvement District
2021-02-Coyote Crossing Subdivision
Budget FY 2024 - 2025
Streetlight Improvement .strict
"SLI "") 021-0 Coyote Crossing
Number of streetlights
Energy cast per month per streetlight
Monthly n gy cost for the SLID l . 4
Annual energy cast for the SLID $226.08
Number of residences in the SLID 12
Annual energy leery per residence
84
in the l .
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.7.
File ID: 24-433
Sponsor:Ted Wolff Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Consideration of approval of Public Works Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years
2025 through 2029.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction
' Home of the Superstition Mountains
DATE: MAY 21, 2024
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
THROUGH: BRYANT POWELL, CITY MANAGER
FROM: ROBERT WISLER, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP)
PURPOSE
City Staff recommends approval of the Public Works CIP as presented.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Pinal Regional Transportation Authority (PRTA) is doing a call for projects from governing
agencies in the county as part of the development of a new Transportation Plan funded
by a half-cent sales tax that is planned to be voted on by county residents in November
2025. The city intends to submit four projects for inclusion on PRTA's plan - the SR 24, SR
505, Ironwood Road improvement, and Meridian Road improvement. PRTA requires that
for local projects to be included in the new regional plan, city council approval is
required. Given these two projects are on the Public Works Department's CIP, staff
requests that the Mayor and City Council acknowledge and approve the submittal of
these two projects to be included in PRTA plan by approving the attached Public Works
CIP.
ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
If the Public Works CIP is not approved, the city will be unable to submit Ironwood Road
and Meridian Road improvements to PRTA and be unable to get PRTA funding for design
and construction of these major infrastructure projects.
FY25-29 Public Works CIP List
Estimated Budget Fiscal
Project Name Location CIP Type Scope of Work Cost Year
Apache Trail Median Curbs Installation, Construction of curbing around medians. Includes
Phase 5 From Superstition Harley crossover to Ocotillo Dr. New Construction scuppers and turn lane extensions where needed. 500,000 FY25
Bank and bottom lining with shotcrete and angular rip
Palm Wash Channel Improvement South of 16th Ave.to Renaissance Ave. New Construction rap. 300,000 FY25
North side of Southern Ave.approx.between Design and construction of sidewalk and a maintenance
Southern Ave.Sidewalk Infill Mardian Dr.and Delaware Dr. New Construction access driveway to Palm Wash. 400,000 FY25
Palm Springs Subdiv.Curb Installation Curb installation on select streets within subdivision. New Construction Desing and construction of curb&gutter. 750,000 FY25
Ocotillo Dr.Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk
Improvement Ocotillo Dr.from 1 st Ave.to Broadway Ave. New Construction Construction of C/G/S. 750,000 FY25
Fiber Optic Trunk Line Extension and Installation of fiber and conduit with connection to traffic
Connection to Traffic Signals Ironwood Dr.from Baseline Ave.to 36th Ave. New Construction signals at Baseline and 36th Ave. 250,000 FY25
Installation of storm drain system and widening of
Delaware Dr.Improvement From Broadway Ave.to 16th Ave. New Construction roadway including addition of bike lanes. Grant FY25
Installation of storm drain system and widening of
Winchester Rd.Improvement From Southern Ave.to 29th Ave. New Construction roadway with addition lane. Grant FY25
Lost Dutchman Blvd.Reconstruction, Reconstruct roadway base and pavement. Install bike
Phase 4 From Meridian Dr.to Ironwood Dr. Reconstruction lanes. 1,000,000 FY25
Haven Hallow Subdiv.Street Pavement Includes reconstruction of streets within southern
Reconstruction portion of this subdivision. Reconstruction Reconstruct roadway base and pavement. 450,000 FY25
Ironwood Dr.Repave From Superstition Blvd.to Apache Trail Rehabilitation Repave of existing asphalt pavement(mill&fill). 450,000 FY25
Broadway Ave.Repave From Meridian Dr.to Idaho Rd. Rehabilitation Repave of existing asphalt pavement(mill&fill). 1,600,000 FY25
Purchase needed ROW on Ironwood Dr.between
Ironwood Dr.ROW Acquistion S.Ironwood between Baseline Ave.and Elliot Ave. ROW Baseline Ave.and Elliot Ave. 500,000 FY25
Superstition Blvd.Sidewalk Ramp Retrofit sidewalk ramps to ADA compliance for following
Retrofit From Meridian Dr.to Idaho Rd. Safety/ADA years repave of pavement. 200,000 FY25
Southern Ave.and Tomahawk Southern Ave.trom Weekes Wash to Tomahawk Design and construction of storm drain,roadway
Improvement Rd.and Tomahawk Rd.from Southern Ave.to New Construction widening and CIGIS installation. Grant FY26
Southern Ave./Delaware Dr.Traffic
Signal Southern Ave.intersection with Delaware Dr. New Construction Design and construction of new traffic signal for location. 1,250,000 FY26
Meridian Dr.Capacity Improvements Ray Ave.to SR24 New Construction Design,ROW and construction for new roadway 6,000,000 FY26
Palm Wash Channel Improvement along Stabilize and shotcrete inslope and floor of Palm Wash
Southern Ave. Southern Ave.west of Delaware Dr. New Construction channel. 500,000 FY26
Reconstruction of roadway base and pavement for south
South Idaho R.Reconstruction From US60 To Baseline Ave. Reconstruction bound lane.Install bike lane. 450,000 FY26
Superstition Blvd.Repave From Meridian Dr.to SR88 Rehabilitation Repave of existing asphalt pavement(mill&fill). 1,900,000 FY26
Old West Highway Repave,Phase 1 From SR88 to Tomahawk Rd. Rehabilitation Repave of existing asphalt pavement(mill&overlay). 1,100,000 FY26
Apache Villas Sidewalk Ramp Design and reconstruct non-ADA conforming sidewalks
Reconstruction Various areas throughout subdivision Safety/ADA within community in prep for street overlay in FY27. 650,000 FY26
Apache Trail/Delaware Dr.Traffic Signal Design and construction of updated sidewalk ramps,ped
Improvement Apache Trail intersection with Delaware Dr. Safety/ADA button locations and ped crosswalk facilities. 250,000 FY26
Cactus Ka.ana Auto Can at r. Auto uenter ur.west Or omanaWK Ka.ana uactus Reconstruct roa way oase and pavement. ns a i e
Pavement Reconstruction Rd.from Auto Center Dr.to Baseline Ave. Reconstruction lanes. 900,000 FY27
Hilton Rd.Reconstruction From Broadway Ave.to Superstition Blvd. Reconstruction Reconstruction of roadway base and pavement. 900,000 1 FY27
Broadway Ave.Repave From Goldfield Rd.to Arroya Dr. Rehabilitation Thick overlay of pavement. 300,000 FY27
Old West Highway Repave,Phase 2 From Tomahawk Rd.to US60 Rehabilitation Repave of existing asphalt pavement(mill&overlay). 1,700,000 FY27
4th Ave.Repave From Winchester Rd.to Goldfield Rd. Rehabilitation Repave of existing aphalt pavement(overlay). 800,000 FY27
esign,ROW ano construction to widen existing 2 ane
Meridian Dr.Capacity Improvements From Guadalupe Ave.to Elliot Ave. New Construction to 4 or 6 lanes. 4,000,000 FY28
esign,Kuvv anci construction to wi en existing ianes to
Ironwood Dr.Capacity Improvements From US60 To Baseline Ave. New Construction 4 or 6 lanes. 4,000,000 FY28
econs ruc ion or roa way Dase anci pavement. instan
Delaware Dr.Reconstruction From Superstition Blvd.to Lost Dutchman Blvd. Reconstruction bike lanes. 1,200,000 FY28
N.Ironwood Dr.Reonstruction From Superstition Blvd.to Tepee St. Reconstruction Reconstruction of roadway base and pavement. 600,000 FY28
Southern Ave.Reconstruction From Cortez Rd.to Starr Rd. Reconstruction Reconstruction of roadway base and pavement. 500,000 FY28
Design,ROW and construction to widen existing 2 lane
Meridian Dr.Capacity Improvements From Baseline Ave.to Houston Ave. New Construction to 4 or 6 lanes. 6,000,000 FY29
Design,ROW and construction to widen existing 2 lane
Ironwood Dr.Capacity Improvements From Baseline to Elliot Ave. New Construction to 4 or 6 lanes. 8,000,000 FY29
Design,ROW and construction to widen existing 2 lane
Ironwood Dr.Capacity Improvements From Ray Ave.to SR24 New Construction to 4 or 6 lanes. 6,000,000 FY29
TOTAL: 54,150,000
1
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.8.
File ID: 24-343
Sponsor: Chip Wilson Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Brief summary of intergovernmental updates from mayor and councilmembers.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No.9.
File ID: 24-344
Sponsor: Bryant Powell Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
City Manager's Report.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No. 10.
File ID: 24-437
Sponsor:Jorge Gutierrez Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Announcement of Current Events.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No. 11.
File ID: 24-420
Sponsor: Misty Moseley Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Conduct a public hearing to receive input and discuss potential projects for the utilization
of Fiscal Year 2024 ("FY24") Community Development Block Grant("CDBG") Regional
Account ("RA")funds and State Special Project ("SSP")funds.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction
W
Finance Departivent
ATE: May 21, 2024
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Bryant Powell, City Manager
Angelie Hawley, Finance Director
F Misty Moseley-Helber, Grants Administrator
SUBJECT: Public Hearing regarding FY24 CDBG
REQUEST
Presentation and discussion:
1. Conduct a public hearing to receive input and discuss potential projects for the utilization
of Fiscal Year 2024 ("FY24") Community Development Block Grant("CDBG")
Regional Account("RA") funds and State Special Project ("SSP") funds.
Both programs are federal grant programs administered by the Arizona Department of Housing
("ADOH"). The CDBG RA funding is allocated to the community as long as a viable project is
submitted. The SSP funding is awarded through a statewide competitive application process.
BACKGROUND
Since 1974, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has provided assistance to local
communities to address the following national objectives:
1) Meet the needs of low and moderate income citizens;
2) Prevent/eliminate slums and blight in a community; and/or
3) Address urgent needs to the health/welfare of a community.
Apache Junction has participated in the CDBG program since 1982. To participate in the
programs and receive funds, a community must be able to document that citizens and officials
have been given the opportunity to discuss community needs and suggest possible projects.
Ultimately, the decision on which CDBG and SSP projects will be submitted rests with the
elected officials in a community.
During the public meetings the city is required to discuss the following:
1) Objectives of the CDBG Program
A. Project benefits the low to moderate income population
1. Will benefit the entire community (if a city currently has a community-wide
low-income percentage greater than 51%);
2. Will benefit a specific area of the community (a census tract with at least 51%
low to moderate income); or
3. Will benefit a limited clientele as defined by the CDBG program.
B. Project addresses slum and blight
1. Within an approved redevelopment area per ARS and ADOH.
C. Project addresses an urgent need
1. This is classified under natural disasters (traditionally not eligible for the City
of Apache Junction).
2) Type of Eligible Activities
Although many projects are considered eligible under the CDBG program, the
proposed project must be reflected in the ADOH's Consolidated Plan and Action Plan.
Likewise, there are restrictions for projects being submitted under the SSP program
including projects considered ready to go which means the environmental review and
project design has been completed. Other projects shown preference include housing
rehabilitation and equipment purchases.
3) Previous Use of CDBG Funds
4) Amount of Funds Available
The City of Apache Junction is anticipating receiving $130,000 in CDBG RA
funds. These funds are guaranteed to the community as long as a viable project is
submitted for funding to ADOH. This application is due August 1, 2024.
In years past, the city partnered with the Town of Payson to receive double
funding every other year. The city chose to end that partnership in 2011.
The city was approached by Gila County in April 2021 with a partnership
proposal which is still in effect. The City of Apache Junction will receive Gila County's
portion of funding in FY24, effectively doubling the amount to $130,000. Gila County
received Apache Junction's portion of funding in FY23.
The City of Apache Junction may submit an application for SSP funds in which
the city may request up to $500,000.
DISCUSSION
Based upon the city's current low to moderate income status (which is 57.07%),the city can
focus their CDBG and SSP efforts on projects that meet the following criteria:
1) Benefit the entire community (park improvements);
2) Assist persons within a limited clientele category (seniors, disabled); and/or
3) Assist homeowners who are proven to be low-income (housing rehabilitation).
RECOMMENDATION/ACTION REQUIRED
Staff respectfully recommends the city council:
1. Conduct a public hearing to receive input and discuss potential projects.
2
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No. 12.
File ID: 24-421
Sponsor: Kelsey Schattnik Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Presentation, discussion, public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 24-09 (case
P-23-64-GPA), requested by Jason Barney and John Hartman with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe
Properties LLC, and represented by Greg Davis with (plan Consulting for a proposed major
general plan land use map amendment to redesignate 18 acres at the southeast corner of
US-60 and Goldfield Road from Commercial to High Density Residential. (This is the
companion case to Rezoning Case P-23-63-PZ).
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City ofApache Junction
Development Services Department
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
STAFF MEMO
Date: May 8, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Through: Bryant Powell, City Manager
Rudy Esquivias, Development Services Director
Sidney Urias, Planning Manager
From: Kelsey Schattnik, Senior Planner
Case
Numbers : P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
Subject: May 21, 2024, City Council Public Hearing:
P-23-63-PZ: Proposed Rezoning of approximately 18 acres
from General Commercial by Planned Development ("B-1/PD")
(Ordinance No. 1144) and B-1/PD (Ordinance No. 1146) to
High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned
Development ("RM-2/PD")
P-23-64-GPA: Proposed Major General Plan Amendment to
redesignate approximately 18 acres from Commercial to High
Density Residential
Summary
P-23-63-PZ Is a Planned Development (PD) Rezoning request by Greg
Davis with Iplan Consulting, representing the property owner, Jason
Barney with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC, to rezone
approximately 18 acres from General Commercial by Planned Development
("B-1/PD") (Ordinance No. 1144) and B-1/PD (Ordinance No. 1146) to
High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned Development ("RM-
2/PD") near the southeast corner of the US-60 and Goldfield Road. The
subject site is proposed to be developed with approximately 271 rental
units to be known as Silveray on Goldfield.
P-23-64-GPA Is a proposed Major General Plan Amendment of APNs 103-01-
0110, 103-01-0130, 103-01-0140, 103-01-0150, 103-01-0160, 103-01-0170
and 103-01-0180, located near the southeast corner of Goldfield Rd.
and US-60, from Commercial to High Density Residential (40 du/ac) .
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing and Recommendation
Due to the requirements for a Major General Plan Amendment, the
Planning and Zoning Commission held two (2) public hearings for these
cases . The General Plan requires that these meetings be held in two
(2) different locations .
The Planning and Zoning Commission held the first public hearing for
P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA on March 26, 2024 in the Superstition Fire
and Medical District' s Board Room located at 565 N. Idaho Road. Please
see the attached staff report and exhibits presented to the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
At this meeting, Staff made a presentation and introduced the
preliminary recommended conditions of approval for the Planned
Development Rezoning and Major General Plan Amendment. The applicant
also made a presentation and answered questions asked by the
Commission.
Eight (8) residents of Golden Vista Resort spoke during the meeting.
Their primary concerns included:
1 . The two-story height of the development
2 . Water pressure concerns
3 . Increased density
4 . Property value concerns
5 . Maintaining commercial land
6. Increased traffic
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a second public hearing for P-
23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA on April 23, 2024 . Both Staff and the applicant
gave a presentation. Please see the attached staff report and exhibits
presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Five (5) residents spoke during the meeting. Their primary concerns
included:
1 . The two-story height of the development
2 . The desire for commercial development at this site.
3 . Increased density.
Ultimately, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend
approval of P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA, subject to the conditions of
approval that were recommended in the Staff Report, dated April 23,
2024, with the elimination of Project Specific Condition Numbers 1 &
2 .
Project Specific Condition No. 1 would have required the developer to
reserve 5 acres on the north side of Resort Boulevard to remain
commercial. Project Specific Condition No. 2 provided a list of
General Commercial Uses that would not be permitted.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-Pz & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
The commissioners who voted in favor of the proposed development
discussed the following:
1 . The benefit of developing a historically vacant property.
2 . The benefit of adding additional rooftops .
3 . Whether this site is viable for commercial use and noted that the
approved development plan has been in existence for 20+ years and
has yet to be developed.
4 . Recent trends of commercial development.
5 . Not wanting to keep commercial property that may never develop.
The commission members who voted against the proposal discussed:
1 . The desire of an ownership product at this site as opposed to a
rental product.
2 . The lack of desire to continue changing the voter approved
General Plan.
3 . The concern of changing commercial to residential.
4 . Concerns regarding the lack of affordability with market rate
housing.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval of cases P-23-63-PZ and P-23-64-GPA
subject to the full list of conditions found within the Planning and
Zoning Commission staff report, including project specific conditions
1 and 2, which are described below:
1) Lot Numbers 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the existing Superstition Falls
Subdivision shall remain zoned General Commercial by Planned
Development ("B-1/PD") .
2) The permitted uses in the B-1 zoning district shall be those
which are permitted by Zoning Ordinance, Article 1-5, § 1-5-3:
Non-Residential Use Regulations, except that the following
uses shall not be permitted herein:
Motor vehicle dealer (new or used vehicles; and similar
uses) ;
Thrift store/used merchandise sales;
Medical marijuana facilities and dual licensees;
Swap meets;
Tattoo and/or piercing services;
Death care services/funeral homes;
Commercial parking lots and garages;
Check cashing stores;
Psychiatric and substance abuse facilities;
Nursing and residential care facilities;
Homeless shelter;
Community food and relief services;
Commercial equestrian boarding, rentals, arenas and
academies;
Cemeteries/mausoleum;
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
Scenic and sightseeing terminal/parking;
Assisted living facility;
Group care home;
Multi-family residential (including apartments,
condominiums or townhouses) ;
Similar uses designated by the Development Services
Director not conducive to the City' s and community' s goals
and objectives for successful community commercial
development.
City Council Work Session - May 6, 2024
On May 6, 2024, the City Council reviewed cases P-23-63-PZ and P-23-
64-GPA at a work session. This item was for presentation and
discussion only. The Council primarily had questions regarding the
proposed size and location of commercial zoning being recommended by
Staff, why Pinal County was opposed to the General Plan Amendment, and
details as to why surrounding residents were opposed to the project.
Major General Plan Amendment
Please note that a major general plan amendment requires a 2/3
majority vote (5 out of 7) of the Council for approval . If the general
plan amendment is not approved, the rezoning case cannot be approved.
Three motions are required:
• Major General Plan Amendment (Resolution No. 24-09)
• Planned Development Rezoning (Ordinance No. 1547 and Resolution
No. 24-08)
Attached:
- Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Reports and attachments (March 23, 2024 &
April 23, 2024)
- Resolution No. 24-09
- Ordinance No. 1547
- Resolution No. 2408
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
1
From: Annette Braun <abr n2999 gmail.c m
Tuesday, March 21,2023 9,32 A
Kelsey Schattni
[External] Rroadstor e Silvery development
Good morning Kelsey,
Gary and I live at 3710 S Goldfield Rd, and are very opposed to 2 story homes in the proposed development across from
Goldfield Rd e have had this property since 2€ 18 and enjoy the views of Superstition Mountains.There are
approximately 1000 residents whom enjoy these vies from across from this proposed development.Please note our
objections to 2 story homes in this development. Thank you.
Gary and Annette Braun
Sent from my Wad
t
From: bdecorte( ml.rroccarrr
Sent- Wednesday,April 12,2023 2:23 Pivl
m Kelsey Schattni
Subject- [External) Broadstone Silveray Development
Kelsey,
I am again writing to oppose the Brtaadstone Silveray proposed development near the southwest corner of the US 60
and S.Goldfield Road. I have recently become aware that there is an underground drainage system running through the
property. There is a lame circular iron plate at the south end of the property near the La Dolce`vita development an
just off the existing sidewalk which is,by the way, used by many walkers); If the development is approved, I was in
hopes that the land would be reduced to level with the sidewalk and street before building SINGLE STORY HOMES on the
existing elevated berm. I am concerned with the lass of the mountainous view from Malden Vista,located directly
across the street:I purchased my property can the East wall of the restart because of this view and am concerned with the
lass of property value if the scenic view is lost;
4 have also learned that there is a"wash" located toward the back of the proposed building site.
Please acid this letter to my original communication ated March 27,2023. Thank you for your time and consideration
regarding this proposed housing development,
Sincerely,
Carol De Corte
Golden vista Resort Lot 481
Apache Junction,AZ 8511
I
bdecorte@m.rr.com
Sent: Monday, March 27, 0 3 Z. 9 Pt t
Kelsey Schattnrk
[External] BROADSTONE SILVERAY DEVELOPMENT
Kelsey,
1 am writing to oppose the 6roadstone Silvery proposed development near the southwest corner of the US 60 and
Goldfield Road. 1 am a resident and property owner in Golden Vista Resort,directly opposite the proposed planned
development. This will directly affect my property value. 1 purchased this particular property in the resort because f
the views of the typical desert area across the street and the spectacular views of Superstition Mountain, Slily Mountain,
and the further mountains 1 am from Michigan. THIS VIEW 1S ARIZO Ali The proposed development will most certainly
block mostof my view and therefore,decrease the value of my property located on the east wall of the resort. 1 urge the
Apache Junction planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council to carefully consider the impact this proposed
development will have on the neighboring community of Golden Vista and it's resident's property values and views.
1 am also concerned about the impact on our water system with the addition of this many new homes needing
water. We,in Arizona,are continually reminded of the need to conserve our water usage because of drought conditions
in recent years. The increased traffic and noise on goldfield is also a concern, not to mention the extended period of
building disruption on goldfield and increased difficulty of golden Vista residents exiting our resort through our East
Gate and Making a left turn. We will also be experiencing increased traffic on goldfield from new residents in the
development south of Baseline Rd as they turn north on goldfield to access Highway 60,
1 understand the proposed development is a mix of 1 story and Z story houses, if the city should chase to approve
development of this land, 1 would suggest the developer revise their plan and to build the Z story homes only north of
the gas station,and therefore not blocking the golden Vista entire View,as would happen on the existing proposed snap
of the community."
Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this proposed building.
Sincerely,
Coral DeCorte
Golden Vista Resort Lot 481
3710 S.goldfield Rd.
Apache Junction,AZ 85119
t
connie wigley <cywi @gmail.c m
Sent: Thursday,March 23, 2023 4122 P
g Kelsey Schattni
Subject JExternall Broadstone Silveray Deveopment
I am Connie WigieV and I live at 3710 S Goldfield rd.Apache Junction,AZ.
I appose any 2 story buildings being built across from Golden Vista Resort;We bought in this area because of the view of
the Superstition Mountains and the rural surroundings. This development will cause Mauch more traffic and will put an
even greater strain on our water usage:
Sincerely,Connie y Wigley
Kelsell I
Diane Breitbach <d ane.br itb ch r°na l.c m
Sent Friday;March 24,2023 :57 AM
Kelsey Schattnik
Subject: ]External] Broadstone Silveray Development
consideringHello Kelsey,
I am a resident of Golden Vista Resort at 3710 S Goldfield Rd, Apache
Junction, AZ 85119 and I understand that the property across the street
from Golden Vista Resort has been sold and the developers are
r
concerningll increase traffic immensely in our area. With one and
two story homes, that can imply a two or three car household, which
causes a huge influx in the already busy streets. During
months, we have the added traffic of the Renaissance Festival and i
year the LPGA in
reviewing planning r this development. r consideration
Sincerely,appreciatedl
Diane Breitbach
Kelsey i
Glenn Nelson <norskinelson@hotrmail.coi
Thursday, March 23 2023 1026
a Kelsey Scattnik
Subject- [External] Broadstone Silveray Deveopment
e are on the wall of Golden Vista Resort with the mountains toward the east. We are very concerned of the
information of the development that is planned to be developed on the east side of Goldfield Road. Our park
is a property owned parka We may be temporary, but we have a stake in AZ and what happens locally or even
state- ide
e understand that two story houses are planned to be put up. We, my wife and I would prefer to see single
level housing. We enjoy the view,have concerns of a two story site that would"allow persons of the second
story to look down at our park residents/homes,and are concerned of the desired land/home owner that
would e coming into the development.
f, and all possible,we would suggest that the homes be a single level.
Another concern for gas is Internet availability. Our park has struggled to have a reliable internet distribution
within the park. We are finding that Internet providers are struggling to catch up to the growth, And this can
also relate tot e cell phone. As a member of the utilities committee, I would like to be informed of plans of
these two products and if possible, be provided with conversations or discussions of plans for the area. We
are very concerned of a Internet provider within the park and if plans for a more reliable provider were
combined into the development, this would provide the means to gain a more reliable internet program.
Thank you for your consideration and review of the information above. Glenn and Josephine Nelson Lot 479
1
Kelsey Sc aftnik
Lanny Aderman <Iraderrr an@yahoo coo
Sent* Thursday, March 30,2023 810 PIv1
Kelsey Sc atmi
[External) Silvery Development
► Kelsey,
1 am writing you with hopes that the development planned for the southeast corner of US 60 and Goldfield Rd will he re-
considered to limit homes to one story. l understand that 2 Stagy homes are being planned for this development which
will really restrict our view of Superstition Mountains. We live in the Golden Vista Resort across the street from the
proposed development.
Thank you for considering our request.
Sincerely,
Lanny Aderman
Golden Vista resident.
3 313
Sent from yahoo Mail for iPad
t
Pam Oswald <p osa ld heatrn il.com
Sent: Sunday, arch 26 2023 .33 AM
Kelsey S h ttni
Subject: [External] Proposed Silvery Development along S.Goldfield Rd.
[am contacting you regarding the proposed horsing development near the corner of US-60 and Goldfield Rd. We own
property in Golden Vista Resort along Goldfield Rd.,and enjoy our view of Silly Mountain and the Superstition
Mountains. It would be very sac[ if 2-story homes are built as that would destroy viers of the nature and the
mountains. Please consider limiting the new horses t -stagy so they don't obstruct views and try to keep all of Apache
Junction more rural with scenic views for everyone.
Thank you!
Jim and Para Oswald
Sent from Mail for Windows
t
Kelsey i
Ron ward <cam r @hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15,2023 141 PM
Kelsey Schattni
Subject: [External] l roadstone Silty ray
Kelsey,We live at 3710 S Goldfield Rd lot 474 and are very apposed to the two story homes planed for the Broadstone
development.Ail the surrounding homes are one stor : wd story house's will block the views of the mountain from
old nwista the view is why we bought in Goldenvista, Thank you. Ronald Ward
Sent from my iPhone
t
4/3/24,9:21 AM Mail-Kelsey Schaftnik-Outlook
[External] Silvery Development
Candy DeBroux <cdebroux7@gmail.com>
Sun 4/16/2023 1:57 PM
ToXelsey Schattnik <kschattnik@apachejunctionaz.gov>
Dear Ms. Schattnik,
I am reaching out as I have heard of a proposed residential development being considered at the
southeast corner of South Goldfield Road and Hwy 60. 1 would like to express my opposition to the
development as planned. My husband and I specifically purchased our home in the Golden Vista
Resort with our backyard on Goldfield Road so we can enjoy unencumbered views of the Superstition
Mountains. To learn a development is being planned across the road from us with TWO STORY homes
which will block our views is very disheartening. I strongly believe that any development being
considered in this area should be limited to one story construction in line with the other homes in the
area. The recently built Goldview subdivision (northwest corner of Hwy 60 and Goldfield Rd is all one
story. Golden Vista is all one story_. Dolce Vita is all one story. There is no reason two story buildings
should be considered in this neighborhood, especially to the EAST of existing one story homes. With
the construction currently underway of thousands of new homes in Apache Junction to the south of
Baseline Rd, there is ample opportunity for two story homes in those newly developed areas which
would not impact existing homeowners. I realize the planning board and developer do not care about
my ability to enjoy my backyard views, but please understand this also would inevitably reduce the
value of our home (and our neighbors) once our views are gone.
I would also be interested to know what plans are being made to accommodate the additional traffic
on Baseline and Goldfield roads created by all these new homes along with water needs for thousands
of new residents. We are constantly being reminded of the limited water supply in this area and the
need to conserve water which makes me wonder where the water for all these new residents is going
to come from.
If this plan is allowed to proceed, I ask that only one story buildings be allowed in the development to
preserve the views of the thousands who already live here.
Thank you for your time and consideration of my concern.
Sincerely,
Candace DeBroux
3710 S Goldfield Rd, Lot 482
Apache Junction, AZ
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADhiMmEOMzlmLWUwMzgtNGRkNSlhOWViLTIlZGM3YjVhNzcOZQAQAH%2BXYdsR6HBDpnUsLWTQ7... 1/1
1
Sally Craiger <mscr lger@ msn.com>
Sent: Monday, March 27,202 2:52 PIA
Kelsey Schattnik
Subject: [External) Broadstone Silveray, US 60 @ Goldfield Rd,AJ,AZ
Good Monday,Kelseyl
e have been year round residents of Golden Vista Resort,3710 S Goldfield Rd,tot 386,AJ,AZ for 10 years.
Our primary concerns of the new development are water&traffic,All of AZ is still in major drought yet all we see is
building&more building for more residents.yes,the tax dollars are important but we all need water to survive.
Can Goldfield Rd support the traffic of this large new development? hat are AJs plans for water resources&traffic
issues with any new evelopment7
e see the signs have Rene up, "New domes Coming Soon;" is Broadstone Silver ay a done deal?
Superstition Vistas,almost building homes,will add hundreds of vehicles to US 60 @ Goldfield Rd.
What's the plan for all of this new growth in AP
Please add our concerns to the project case file.
Thank you.
Sally&Mike Craiger
480- S - 15
i
From: Sharon Kinnan <golions28@gmaii.corn>
Sent: Monday,October 23,2023 .S?AM
Greg Mavis
c Kelsey Schattnik
Subject: - Re. (External) Silveray development plan on Goldfield
Good morning Greg,
Thanks for your response.
Sharon
n Sun,Oct 22,2023, 11:54 PM Greg Davis re iolanconsuutin oom wrote:
Hello Sharon and thanks for reaching out to us about this proposal: No worries about missing the meeting—most of
what we will present was in the letter and email is a great way to continue the conversation for any questions you
have:
Regarding water,the City of Apache Junction is the water provider and they have accounted for the eater to be used
for this property in their 100 year Certificate of Assured Water Supply(CAWS). in fact,our proposal will actually reduce
the anticipated water(along with sewer and electrical)demand for this property as the site is currently approved for
much more intensive uses.The project will be served by a combination of existing and new lines in goldfield Road an
Resort Boulevard.The City requires extensive modelling and testing to ensure existing residents do not see a drop in
water pressure and if upgraded Braes/equipment are needed to avoid that scenario,they will require us to install them
prior to any residents moving into our project:Water is an important issue in mulch of Arizona and fortunately the City
ofApache Junction has planned ahead for properties such as ours to ensure an adequate supply exists foreveryone in
the City.
Regarding the potential height of the project,we were anticipating the concern over the loss of the views which is why
we are limiting our development to 2-stories(30-feet)which,is what its permitted on the parcels around our property
and we are doing more than just voluntarily limiting the height—we are actually snaking it a written part of the zoning
approval(via the RD overlay)which means that any development,whether it be us or a future project,will have to
comply with the 30-foot proposed height limit UNLESS they decide to go through the rezoning process again which will
require another complete public process including a new neighborhood meeting and new public hearings. it is certainly
possible for some future developer to propose that,but 1 can tell you from experience it is always much harder
politically to increase height allowances in a situation like this where you have existing neighbors who care about their
view,We recognize that we will be impacting the view of the Superstitions from some parts of the community since
nothing is there today to obscure it(besides the Chevron canopy),but we hope the 30-feet proposed is a fain
compromise given it is approve for 5-feet today.
Hopefully l have answered your initial inquiry adequately, if not,or if you have additional questions,please let me
know.
Greg
r
3/20/24 z:oopm Mai|'nvmvvSohaunix-Ovnoox
RE: [External] S^lveraVdevelopment plan on Goldfield
Greg DDV3 <gr8g@iplODCOOsUlting.[O0>
Sun 10/22/20238:54PK4
To:3haron0nnan <go|ions7O@gmai|zom^
[cKe|seySchattnik <kszhattnik@apmchejunrhonazgov'
Hello Sharon and thanks for reaching out tous about thisproposa|. No worries about missing the meeting...most
of what we will present was in the letter and email is a great way to continue the conversation for any questions
you have.
Regarding water,the City of Apache Junction is the water provider and they have accounted for the vvaterto be
used for this property in their 100yeer Certificate of Assured Water Supply(CAWS). In fact, our proposal will
actually reduce the anticipated water(along with sewer and electrical) demand for this property asthesite is
currently approved for much more intensive uses. The project will be served bya combination of existing and
new lines in Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard. The City requires extensive modelling and testing toensure
existing residents do not see a drop in water pressure and if upgraded lines/equipment are needed to avoid that
scenario,they will require us to install them prior to any residents moving into our project. Water|sanimportant
issue in much of Arizona and fortunately the City of Apache Junction has planned ahead for properties such as
ours to ensure en adequate supply exists for everyone in the City.
Regarding the potential height of the project,we were anticipating the concern over the loss of the views which is
why we are limiting our development to 2-stories (30-feet) which is what is permitted on the parcels around our
property and we are doing more than just voluntarily limiting the height...vve are actually making it a written part
of the zoning approval (via the PD overlay) which means that any development,whether it be us or a future
project, will have to comply with the 30-foot proposed height limit UNLESS they decide to go through the rezoning
process again which will require another complete public process including a new neighborhood meeting and new
public hearings. It is certainly possible for some future developer to propose that, but | can tell you from
experience it is always much harder politically to increase height allowances in a situation like this where you have
existing neighbors who care about their view. VVe recognize that we will be impacting the view ofthe
Superstitions from some parts of the community since nothing is there today to obscure it (besides the Chevron
canopy), but vve hope the 3Ufee1 proposed is a fair compromise given it is approved for 45-feet today.
Hopefully | have answered your initial inquiry adequately. |f not, orif you have additional questions, please let me
know.
Thanks,
...an~''
Gre9 [aVi5
48[].227A50
GhegOip.|aDcomUlt(n4.CzM
From:Sharon SharonKinnen <Qo|ions78@gmaiicom>
Sent:Sunday, October 22, 2O23 3:39PIVI
To: Greg Davis<gneg@ip|anconsu|dn8zom>
Cc: kschattnik@apachejunctionacgov
Subject:Si|veraydeve|oprnent plan on Goldfield
Dear Greg,
Thank you for inviting residents the informational meeting at Golden Vista Oct. 24th. Unfortunately, | amunable
to attend. However, | would like to ask e few questions and provide comments on some concerns that were not
mentioned |n your letter.
hnpu:8o"Uonk.mffioe3O5.onm/mai|/id0\AQkADh|MmEOMz|mLmUwMzgtNGRkNS1hOVVVLT|1ZGM3Y]VhNznOZQAQxHf3Jx|yOxBPiRnNvf\/ODXQY�3D 112
3/20/24 z:oopm Mai|'nvmvvSohaunix-Ovnoox
The 1st and most important in this day is water. Where will it be coming from and how will this additional need
affect existing residents' use?
Second is the elevation. Your letter states that the plan istoVOLUNTARILY limit the height to 30feet, but
voluntarily does not limit what actually can happen and who knows how long it will be before a developer
changes plans and chooses to&oto4O foot height. Part of the beauty of this area is the Superstition Mountains
and it would be very disappointing to loose that view.
I have copied Kelsey Schattnik in this email to be sure AJ Planning and Zoning is aware of my concerns.
Sincerely,
GharonKinnan
Owner a1 Golden Vista RVResort
xopo:6h"Uook.mffioe3O5.00m/mai0d0\AQkADh|MmEOMdmLmUwMzgtNGRkN31hOVVVLT|1ZGM3Y]VhNzoOZQAQxH0Jx|yOxBPiRnNvfvDDXQ%3D 2/2
3/20/24,2:35 PM Mail-Kelsey Schattnik-Outlook
[External] Silvery Development
Lanny Aderman <Iraderman@yahoo.com>
Thu 3/30/2023 8:10 PM
ToXelsey Schattnik <kschattnik@apachejunctionaz.gov>
Hi Kelsey,
I am writing you with hopes that the development planned for the southeast corner of US 60 and
Goldfield Rd will be re-considered to limit homes to one story. I understand that 2 story homes are
being planned for this development which will really restrict our view of Superstition Mountains. We
live in the Golden Vista Resort across the street from the proposed development.
Thank you for considering our request.
Sincerely,
Lanny Aderman
Golden Vista resident.
3/30/23
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
https://outlook.office365.com/maii/id/AAQkADhiMmEOMzlmLWUwMzgtNGRkNSlhOWViLT11ZGM3YjVhNzcOZQAQALg3ZzAoENFNjm3TeeD2mwM�/�
Kelsey 1
From* Shelley Kaste <Ion li irl@ ahoo.com
Saturday, March 25,2023 3:19 p
T Kelsey Schattnik
Subject: [External] Broadstone Silveray Development
Dear Kelsey Schattnik,
My husband and I live in Golden Vista Resort. The reason we chose GV Resort is because it is on the outskirts of town
and close to superstition mountains, We enjoy the closeness to trails, the quietness, less traffic and;of course; the
Superstition mountains,We purchased our tiny home here knowing that we own the lot and trailer and only pay county
taxes and an HOA fee. If a new development goes in across the street,with two story family homes,what does that mean
for us(sere at Golden Mists Resort? It means more noise, less view, more traffic, more property tax and special
assessments. 1 think that would also discourage others from purchasing here, so thus, bringing our resale values down
as well. Please let me know if there will be a town hall meeting on the subject,we would like to attend, if we are here.
Thank You,
Shelley Kaste
Golden Vista Resident
t
1 ti4/23,8:19 AM Fie:f External]Proposed silver ay project-Kelsey Schattnik-Outlook
[External] ilry project
Kelsey Schattnik <kschattnik@apachejunctionaz.gov
Wed 11/8/2023 553 PM
i Sammy,
Thank you for reaching out to the City of Apache Junction with your thoughts and concerns regarding the
proposed Silvery Development near the southwest corner of the US-60 and Goldfield Road.
I will add this email to the project case file and staff spirt,which will be passed along to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council. I will also ensure that you are on the list to be notified of the public hearings ranee
those are scheduled.
Please feel free to reach out with any additional questions or concerns!
Best,
Kelsey
Kelsey S hattnik,GEED Green Associate
Senior Planner l Development Services Department
City of Apache Junction,AZ
4 0 474-5 i
kschattaaik aparh lunctsnn g
Hour .Monday-Thursday Tarn- paai;closed on Fridays.
From:Sammy sar rray r n4 ya o .co o
Sent:Wednesday,November 8,2023 3:38 Ali]
To* Kelsey Sc atmiik<kschattnik@apachejunctionaz.gov
Subject: [External] Proposed sliveray project
1 als y,This area is made up of 55 and over parks and just mast is single family
httpsi
rsdt rr, dwlaC ustcaCirrlMj qQf-
v5A CdpgnVfiiIvIlvI&r=Nsp ZGggel1J i rt- FT7 ° r► S tl l l c p K0 a7fAu iF.,Zg M1
igUsti-
A F 710p Is Alit r C i 1F =13rt Im f * lay ' n C h xKVuDozO5uNN5mgkwuD
YM&e= thoughts are to much traffic and vandalism and theft if the proposed sed project of apartments
move forth.[ would like to sea a nice 55 and over community r single family homes go its R ntal
property I believe would devalue ray property in Golden Vista R sort. f it goes commercial with a
hospital or restaurants the twenty four hour lights Mould be uncomfortable .It is inevitable to not have-
development but something with lass hustle and bustl ,perhapsa single level strife ma l.l'm familiar with
owning rental property and managing aging property and 1 duet°t like ghat it would bacom .1 don't think
Apache.Jct has a police dept to to handle a big rental property like this and then there is fire protection
and wat r.` ou have old people out here that like their life style and it would be a big disruption and life
style changa.l would like to be on the retailing list for further public meetings on this.Sammy Green, 7t1
bout ank 112
4/24/24,9:26 AM Mail-Kelsey Schattnik-Outlook
[External] Correspondence to Commission et al
Michael David Myers <stainedglasspoetry@live.com>
Tue 4/16/2024 5:23 PM
ToXelsey Schattnik <kschattnik@apachejunctionaz.gov>
April 16, 2024
Dear Mr. Jesse Gage, Ms. Robin Barker, Mr. Ari Kalan, Ms. Sheryl Bigelow, Mr. Richard
Cantwell, Mr. Dirk Begeman, Mr. Nick Leftwich, and Ms. Kelsey Schattnik,
In Mr. Tom Lange's April 15, letter he notes the 2023 - 2024 donations that full time and
part time Golden Vista residents donated to Apache Junction agencies and groups.
In 2022, while I was President of the Stained Glass Club in Golden Vista, I donated
handmade stained glass earrings and suncatchers to Arizona Coalition to End Sexual
and Domestic Violence. The sale of these items raised $700 which provided direct
service to victims and survivors of sexual and domestic violence. Each year I make
stained glass service stars and donate these to Veterans, spouses of Veterans, First
Responders, and personnel serving Police and Fire Departments.
In addition, one resident in Golden Vista, Mr. Dennis Douglas, spends most of his time
in Golden Vista's Workshop making small cars, trailers, and firetrucks from scraps of
wood. For the past ten years, Mr. Douglas has sold these at the Annual March Artisan
show in Golden Vista. He donates all the money generated to the Paws and Claws Care
Center on Baseline. The other groups that Mr. Lange referred to in his letter have
made donations every year. Since 2014, these donations total over $100,000.
Mr. Leftwich's April 9th letter to the Commission states:
"As new developments or rezonings are proposed, Planning Staff, the Planning and
Zoning Commission, and the City Council must evaluate the highest and best use of
commercial properties..."
After the April 9 meeting, Mr. Lange gave Mr. Leftwich his drawing of the proposed
commercial development on 8 acres. Mr. Lange's letter provides detailed information
regarding his vision of the "Goldfield Gulch" development.
Please consider that Mr. Lange's vision within those 8 acres IS the highest and best use
of that property zoned commercial. When a developer is found, Mr. Lange's
commercial vision will be a destination for some and a welcome addition for residents
nearby, and all future residents. Tax dollars will be generated for Apache Junction.
Please follow the recommendation of Mr. Patrick Roberts, Senior Planner, Pinal County
Development Services who stated in his October 17, 2023, letter to Ms. Schattnik, in
NOT supporting Silveray:
"Pinal County staff would not offer our support (of the proposed Silveray
development). Staff finds the request to convert the 18-acre subject site may detract
from prime commercial parcels South of US-60. The location of these parcels having
access to an arterial roadway and a major highway offer potential for higher levels of
traffic consistent with retail requirements and exceeding the trip generation typical of a
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADhIMmEOMzlmLWUwMzgtNGRkNSlhOWViLT11ZGM3YjVhNzcOZQAQAD%2B%2Fnn%2BPTIZHunhXyj... 1/2
4/24/24,9:26 AM Mail-Kelsey Schattnik-Outlook
multi-family development. The presence of such roadways may encourage the market
area of potential commercial opportunities to support communities that are more
distant and may attract revenue to Apache Junction.
Proximity of existing residential uses to the site promotes a pedestrian scaled
commercial development that may support existing residential development on both
the West and East sides of the proposed development. Such commercial parcels would
also support expansion of additional multi-family projects to the South, which are
supported at present by the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan. Development of this
multi-family project to the south of the General Commercial land-use designated
parcels would be consistent with the High Density Residential land-use designation
present within the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan. Staff would be amicable toward
multi-family development south of the proposal area provided commercial
designations remain that would support residential growth:'
If you choose to change zoning to all or part of the 18 acres to high density resident,
kindly consider keeping 8 acres zoned commercial and only support a one story owner
based residential development for the remaining 10 acres.
I hope each Commissioner will be influenced by the comments and concerns voiced by
residents of Golden Vista. Golden Vista contains over 1000 tax paying homeowners in
Apache Junction who will be negatively impacted by the proposed Silveray
development. Although we have a vested interests in recommending that you do not
support the Silveray development, we also believe such action will be the highest and
best use of the property, and therefore better for all who live, visit, and will live in
Apache Junction in the future.
Before your next meeting, please walk along the sidewalk along Goldfield Road outside
Golden Vista, then along the Dolce Vita entrance between the two parcels. With that in
mind, please recommend to the City Council not to approve the Silveray development.
Sincerely,
Michael D Myers 3710 S. Goldfield Road #852 Apache Junction AZ 85119
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAQkADhiMmEOMzlmLWUwMzgtNGRkNS1 hOWViLT11ZGM3YjVhNzcOZQAQAD%2B%2Fnn%2BPTIZHunhXyj... 2/2
April 15, 202
Kelsey Scttnik
Senior Planner, Development Services
City of Apache- Junction
300 E Superstition Blvd
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
RE: SILVERAY PROJECT
Dear ids Schttnskt
This letter to you and the Zoning Planning Commission will
eve to update you with a couple fall owup points re the proposed
SILVERAY development project on Goldfield Rd since my earlier
letters of February and March 19, 2024 which contained - 170
signatures of Golden Vista Resort residents apposed to the
development as proposed.
While we are now resigned to the fact that: the beautiful pristine
parcel of undeveloped land across Goldfield Rd from our resort
will not be preserved for a City of Apache Junction Park, we are
still hopeful that your imminent zoning change f this parcel can
be limited to l--Story residential as opposed to the 2-Story
residential. proposed by the SILVERAY developers.capers. We implore ore-both
you and the Zoning & Planning Commissioners to please keep in
mind that this arse parcel is surrounded on 3 sides by
Story owner-occupied (for the most part) aver-55 residences.
Our Golden Vista Resort (G R) has a 20' height restriction placed
can homes by the city of Apache Junction. So it dregs the
question, why should the City now approve s zoning of 30' high 2-
Story r rental ( ! ) homes directly across Goldfield act from us which
would significantly block our views of the Superstition
Mountains? !
Also, the 27 s ) cunt high density of these proposed rental
homes, along with more than a planned combined total of 500+
parking spaces all oted between garages, carports and open--air
spaces, significantly would add to the local traffic on Goldfield
Rd which already experiences bumper-to-bumper tracked up traf ice
on Renaissance Festival weekends in February & March by these
attempting to bypass the backed up traffzce on Hay 50m 1 single-
story residential development would, of course, necessitate
larger footprint for each building thereby reducing the number o
residences and hence, the traffic. Single-story residences,
whether owner-occupied or rental like the "Havenly upscale
Rental" single starer residences currently being built near City
Hall, would attract moreover- 5 residents which would be more in
keeping with the current makeup of the surrounding neighborhoods
owner-occupied vs rental residences should also be considered for
this vacant parcel already surrounded by owner-occupied homes
t is no secret that owners generally take more pride in the
appearances of their residences over the hang term than do
renters. also, homeowners ners take more civic pride in their
communities as a whole. Just look at the attached list of
donations our GVR CHRISTIAN WOMEN'SASSOCIATION has rude to
Apache Junction and other nearby areas in 2024 alone! Nearly
, 000 of the total money raised 11 34 ) from three resort
patio sales and weekly can collections was donated to outside
causes ! Only $2, 500 of the money raised was kept for causes
within our own resort. Furthermore, all donated items not solved
during the 3 four-hour patio sales were donated to Sunshine Acres
Thrift Shop for their help in housing & supporting children and
teens from problem homes.
Additionally the GVR VETERAN'S a donated $6,000 out of $10,000
raised thru their weekly resort breakfasts to area veteran
groups ! Both the Arizona Honor Flight veteran's group as well as
the Final County veteran's center in Cass Grande received $3, 000
each from the GVR Veteran's Club. The GVR Chapel Services
donates $2,000 annually to a needy area student as scholarship $
to attend a local technical college; GVR angel Tree Group
collects up to_ 5,000 annually for kids at Christmastime, these
funds are sent to City of Apache Junction who then disperses the
funds in part to the Fire & Police depts, 'P '& for school kid's
snacks . The VR tattler's Musical group donates $1,000 annually
to Apache Junction high schools for their music programs. Also
over 650 1s of food was donated by GVR residents to the Apache
Junction Food Bank
Now, ask ourselves: Would the proposed rental community be as
civic-minded and generous?!
Finally, the issue of possibly zoning some of this 1. -acre parcel
for commercial/retail is a reoccuring topic with Zoning &
Planning for both continued tax lase income to the City as well
as area employment opportunities. The current developers cite
'lack of rooftops', i_e, lack of enough nearby bodies/customers
for commercial & reta.il enterprises having little or no interest
in this land. Perhaps the developers are only considering 'Big
Box Stores' and like commercial enterprises?
Please consider the following vision for what could be an
exciting retail corridor development for either the current or
other developers; Zone the entire approximately 3--acre parcel of
land running parallel to and south of Try 60 as "A Planned
Condominium RETAIL Pub" with aWestern-like 1. 1's Old 'Town
Theme! With the - 1, 100 1 homes already in place plus the
Dolce Vitae Resort and the new residential on the other 10 acres
of the parcel in question fronting Goldfield lid and Resort Blvd
plus the new developments going up south of Baseline, evert only
the year-round local residents of the immediate area and the
additional potential customers from : srrounding communities
generated by the high visibility of this parcel from Hwy 60
should assure year-round customers enough to keep this kind of
retail development lucrative!
o many of 11 year-round residents would Like a nearby
"destination cluster" of retail establishments that we could walk
to, bicycle to, scooter to, etc; places like the following could
be successful in a themed Western Old Town such as this s o
maybe 3 'blocks' long with vide covered & railinged walkways
along the store fronts; the :buildings would have manufactured,
'weathered woad' storefronts including the false cold western
upper building facades of varied designs. 'These would be
outlined in various colors of neon to attract motorists along Hwy
60. The walkways and building fronts could be lighted by old-
style western & pedestrian friendly lantern lights There would
e parking bath along the fronts of these 'Old Torn' blacks as
well as ample parking behind, accessible by two drive-thru
'sheets' dividing the 3-blocks of establishments. Are
'architectural.' & business 'approval' ee l/cap it ee would
initially approve businesses for this
retail/restaurant/commercial corridor in keeping with the 1880's
western theme, ie, no cell h ne, - fast toad chain stares, etc,
would be allowed to buy into the condo-commercial i evelo e e t
unless they could prove they would embrace the Cold West theme for
their building & enterprise. After sufficient businesses have
opened here the developers would religuist their
architectural/approval functions to self-governing board of
existing business condo owners
Just consider.der the possibilities! !! This "GOLDFIELD GULCH" could
have a central Saloon similar to the cold western TV show
"Gunsmoke", The Long ranch possibly with a Beer Carden on one
side and a restaurant can the other; a coffee shop & bakery would
open at 6 or 7am, to attract people out for a morning walk or a
strap beforework; a barber shop with lighted red & while pole of
course, a hair & nail. Balers, an cold Time Ice Cream shop; both a
General (Grocery) Store and a Mercantile (Hardware) Store
both of these stores would offer more selection than a typical
convenience store, but less than the 'Big Box' concerns miles
away, the they could be satellites of these parent stares; a Boot
Hill. Western ?ear;-sou eniers & jewelry; a Liquor/Beer & Wine
shop with tr ve-thru; even a bank or S&L with drive th u; (each
of the two preceding stores would be Located on the ends of the
two streets that would pass between the 3 blocks of shags for
drive--thr : convenience. Perhaps the local Police dept tight even
fund a satellite "Sheriff's Office" & locate it on the corner
opposite the drive-thru liquor store and close to the Saloon,
visibility of which alone might help to 'keep the peace' . The
police would not need regular hours, they would use the office on
a came & go irregular day & night basis as a place to use a
personal staff restr om, write up reports, eat their lunches,
even have a short nap in the single io-1 cell equi. ed with
single cot as long as a partner is also there for immediate
response calls. A "Doc's Urgent are" would fit right in; as
would a Stage Coach Depot Cafe/Deli ; an antique or consignment
shop would e: ideal; a florist; a dry cleaner/tailor/laundry; an
"I . rant's PizzaParlor." All fain and convenient shops & stares
for us local residents and for tourists sts in the winter season.
The development might be anchored can either side by a smaller but
old--style elegant " r ha '° h a showing low-royalty-cost older
movies, even time honored 's, Beath of which would keep ticket
costs lower for all those over-55's who miss going to a good
movie close by, t attinees included can heat afternoons and evenings
without the h ssels of modern day purchasing of tickets online,
also catering to those who resist trying to watch DVD's at home
due to the hassels of tying to get their TV's back to TV mode.
The opposite side of GOLDFIELD GULCH might sport a bawling alley
r a roller rink/arcade (also to give area teens a place to ) ;
even an ,ice Rink! (The 1, 2 5 population groups of GVR alone
are Minnesotans, Wisconsinites & ;Canadians respectively! ) Each of
the -block stretches of the establishments could have a central
public "OuthouseAlley", known as 'Central, East & WestAllies'
as well as some restr oms within various establishments 'Though
different shops would have different opening and closing times as
chosen by individual owners, the entire GOLDFIELD GULCH would
close down at ll m leaving only a few parking lot/street/walkway
lights for security,
GOLDFIELD GULCH.
"Build it and they will come! "
Both retailers and customers !
Z
;;;
i
Thomas F Lange
710 S Goldfield Fed,
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
4
CO
to to to hi NJ NJ
to to Us to to to yu 54 to
X3 CD
CO
ctx to
n to In 0
to
—. �O fp
ft�
tfr e
go
` iaxZT
CA
�r
Ot
I.
vy to to To to to to to
«.
CA CA CA CA CA Is 0 CA CA to
tA cy CA CA i 8 t NJ NJ t $ t t $ t t $
to
i t t 8 t0 44 CM to of CA v
9 3 t t & 1 d
:.
On
P on
No in w
—�-
Ln
{ t t! Q
dy h
WD
4
CL SO
CPA
It c N 9
— 8
I co
ul 1p
A 4 0 In No
CA
C to
i x�t J
cm
0 co
Co C
CM
t "
w
a
µ
ffi
Kelsey Schattnik
t
Senior Planner/Development Services Dept,
City of Apache Junction
Dear Ms Sc a ik:
e the undersigned,are writing to voice our concerns about the 2-story, high density, 0- it
rental home development referred to as" ilveray"which is proposed for the land on the east side
of Goldfield Rd south of Hwy 60, We are all residents ofGolden Vista e rt,an over -age
community directly across the street from the proposed development.
Of course, this large -story development would greatly obstruct our views of the Superstition
Mountains but we are opposed to this high density rental development for a number of reasons
for"the common good..
The development would be built on currently pristine undeveloped land which affords beautiful
views of the Superstition Mtns. These views are enjoyed not only by us and other surrounding
age® +communities but by so many Apache Junction locals&visitors alike,as is evidenced by
the many vehicles that sometimes pull over to the side of Goldfield Rd, flashers on,for a quick
minute,to appreciate and snap a couple cellp Otte p otos of the unobstructed view of these
majestic mountains. This even includes busy tradespeople in their company trucks and vans. The
greater the light how on the mountains or dramatic the cloud formations are,the greater the
number of people that stop for a moment of awe:When there is the infrequent snow on the
mountain it can become a parade of appreciators! Once this exquisite land parcel is given over
for development it would be lost forever tot e public domain.
Our Q is this. Would it be possible for the City of Apache Junction to put forth n appeal for
would-be benefactors to come forward with donated funds so the City could purchase this land,
assuming the City has no funds to do so,for a public p k?l
This beautiful parcel of land could then be slowly groomed into a relatively low-maintenance
park as more funds might come available.Development oft e park could be done in phases.
Initially a contest might be held for area landscape architects and students of that discipline to
submit master plans forte park in exchange for name recognition only over the years.
Once a Master Plan is approved, Phase#1 could be a recontouring ofthe shallow drainage ravine
into a retention pond that would benefit wildlife and enhance the future park. Phase#2 might be
grading and paving of bath a one-way roadway with a wide designated bicycle lane winding
around the inside park perimeter; separate pedestrian-only paved walkways would meander thru
the grounds. This way all park users would enjoy their own spaces. The roadway and walking
paths could be done forte most part casing the existing,natural contours of the land.To keep
maintenance costs low only indigenous plants,trees and flora would be planted.Where would be
NO athletic or c ildren's play facilities for the same reason. No lights would be needed for this
y,
dusk-to-dawn park where the singlegate and separate skit gate would locked
unlocked of ce at the appropriate times on their regular rounds,
Phase#3 might be restart s d a few shaded picnic pavilions,all placed to minimize
obstruction of mountain._ views from GoldfieldOver a 20-year period,let's say,this
pedestrian friendly park could become a jewel in the City of Apache Junction Parks system with
many city residents coming out oftheir way to enjoy a peaceful walk here while communing
with nature. Currently there is nothing like it within miles.
However, if a park is completely out of the question for this exquisite Ian arcel,we would
i Altar the i 1 n an e e ,etc tc li it e o `n trr sin le stt owner
ccu ied ca es.given if it is a density cta ity like t e recently c feted roect at the
Hwy 60 exit at Goldfield Rd they would no doubt sell out quickly for the developers given the
fantastic views the homeowners would enjoy.
The undeveloped strip of land running parallel to Hwy 60 and to the east of the Chevron gas
station could remain zoned commercial for future restaurants,offices and ` e lie. With the high
visibility they would have from the highway these commercial enterprises should be quite
successful.
Finally, the key issue here is the need to limit any residential evel ent to sin sto in
lee ing th e s ca in taus o iesA a 2�sto development would attract families
vtth c ild e teens;ntat at all i ee ing t e up oft e immediate ei orhoo s.
-story development,therefore,would also mean much greater water usage and higher traffic
levels;already ors pe ch wltd iaf e en °ss e Festival we have chaotic traffic
hacked a on t l field eli t?. d a is already destined to get worse with
the 1 p 0(+?!)residences being built south of Baseline at Ironwood beyond.
On behalf of all of us we thank you for your careful consideration to these matters.
Sincerely,
u a F. Lange, et al
310 S GoldfiId lid,#48rcle
17- (03
Print name
10 kro-hiol
v0ay,
Print N"4_�� L. t# 2
-7"rat Lit
",NPrint Lit
Print Lot#
Print Lest#
Print 1 Lot#
Print Lot
Print Lest 4
Pratt
Lot#
# Print t Lot#
Print . t
Print Narne: OA) ))a a-1.40
Lot#
a7q
Tart �t dr1t
rLnt tit#
`5 93
Print Name- Lot#
Print Name: �,�3t#
rint a Lot#
rt Name-
(5�rintNam Lot#
trot Lit#
v
t
w
Print(�14) Lit##
Print Name- LXY )eA Lot r
Print NamelA7ZIle Lot#
Print List
DMrint Name: K rvi
Lot#
O?-q Print N s��l
Lit
ca
�fv) Print Name- Lot##
Print NwneLt t#
02>rint m �Yl Lot
(��n
` t Lct##
03SPrint Name.
- Lest
Printcat
-307 Print I
Lot
�6 fn
OITT of
rir ct
Print Narne --Lo—t#
Print Narne. Lot
603it Name.f-rct
i t e.
tit�#
m
Name:Print #
VI
ant b cat
PrintName, cat
��VprintNarmne:
Lot
Y�ve L
rizt gat
Print # ,�33
cat
rant a Lot #
{
312-rixatName: L of#
rt 4 Lot#
rrr�t
L, t# d.�L7
ra I tit
Print t
rint IDS -' L sit
Ot/>0 Print Name: Lot
# Z4.40
)IPrint Name:
Tntli
_rint at
rat Lot#
rint Nam o
6D5 rir
WrintLot#
rint4
Print e: Lotp
) Print
`r1 1 Sae gl-v- 5
o #
r n Lo #
Print Lot
rin : _ of#
OrintN
of
Lot
rrint
b) Print ;
t
707 tint
e-
itxt I t
t tilt €: tit
6)Print Name: -Ov 1�fa� Lot
Print » Lit
t
Print Name:
r
Print N .apt
Z_:Prnint
Lot#
zat Lot
Print
gat d
' t gat#
rint Name "` --
PrintNamme: cat
rat
-Lot#
riot Lot#rz -
t #
Y
m
�t �T
Print
fill
tic
Print
Lot#
Print
Print Nye:
LLrent Lot
Print t
Print Lot
L 1 -5 CIL Arly-�
Erit
t" t-#
rat
t
Ist
r
rintLot# o'ZO
(,C:,)rint ; -L-t-# -,2,�O
rint Nwne: C\\a 0 5 Lot
rintName-
,�)rint
Pit _# �o
Lot
Lot#
Fruit
rin a
rilnit Name:
)rint . a t
' �i t 0
t .. .,
rint Name,
int 7t
at . ��k' ��J�-- �L 0 1�#
)rint . Ub Lot
5C4 N-"
print e Lot
rint I ` . Lot
nt t t
cat
rt At
�rninl cat#
Print(/0)17 I --v2-7
t
Print N
t
riot Namt #
Print N n
Print Name: Lot#
(/3]jjrint
P Name
lkt
Print Nanlek-Jd�kt,�I�-�a��4w
., Font N m "
nt Lot#
Print Name: Lot
!)7Print 4
rrt
�Lot
Print
rnt Nam
#
C/V-3 _Pj
. t O
rtrt
0 #
rit ; Lot 4
�.,t
ptNgn Lot#-22—1
Printt
tint N.--e: D L
#
Print Lot
# (3
Print(/ t
D3rint Name: jkdyn�aqbot#-51
t it
r° t It
riot e Lot
"rat Lot#
rt
Fruit I t
: P rint xi
Lot
0)PrintName:
t
int
t�,cat
rinit Name: T
R
4
Lot
t
Print
ht
rit . t
Lot
rant
t
Print . t
17Jti t g
Vicinity Map
P - 23 - 63 - PZ & P - 23 - 64 - GPA
Planned Development ("PD") Rezoning Request from General
Commercial by Planned Development ("B-1/PD")
and General Commercial by Planned Development
("B-1/PD") to High Density Multiple-Family Residential
by Planned Development ("RM-2/PD") and a Major General Plan
Amendment from Commercial to High Density Residential .
71 i II r 171 � (a �aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
r a }
i
i
Pr
4 k �
a e
9 '
b m
� rMHP/PD
r
Subject Sites
N , w _
Date: 12/14/2023 MMOM
s.
1
broadStonc
vc ra
Traffic Impact Analysis
South of US-60
East of Goldfield Road
in Apache .junction, Arizona
'< August 2022
Project No. 22-1180
Prepared For:
Alliance Residential Company
7135 East Camelback Road, Suite 360
" Scottsdale, AZ 85251
For Submittal to:
Arizona Department of Transportation
Town of Apache Junction
Prepared By:
•
IvTech
10605 North Hayden Road
Suite 140
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
480-659-4250
ALLIANCE BROADSTONE SILVERAY
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
South of US-60 and
east of Goldfield Road in Apache Junction, Arizona
Prepared for:
Alliance Residential Company
7135 East Camelback Road, Suite 360
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
For Submittal to:
Arizona Department of Transportation
Town of Apache ]unction
Prepared By: d
0�,SS10NA(
CivTech Inc. �, '\\OCAr,�. GI)
Q) Y0
a �7
10605 North Hayden Road
v'-r SEAN D. {
Suite 140 MESSNER
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 °r
Office: (480) 659-4250 tie '
Fax: (480) 659-0566 ' ONA 05 '
August 2022
CivTech Project No.22-1180
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3
StudyRequirements...........................................................................................................3
StudyArea ........................................................................................................................3
HorizonYears....................................................................................................................3
EXISTINGCONDITIONS...................................................................................................5
LandUse...........................................................................................................................5
SurroundingLand Use........................................................................................................5
RoadwayNetwork..............................................................................................................5
Intersection Configuration ..................................................................................................6
TrafficVolumes..................................................................................................................7
CapacityAnalysis.............................................................................................................10
Future Roadway Improvements ........................................................................................11
CrashHistory...................................................................................................................11
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................................12
SiteLocation ...................................................................................................................12
SiteDensity/Intensity.......................................................................................................12
SiteAccess......................................................................................................................12
TripGeneration ...............................................................................................................13
Vehicle Trip Distribution And Assignment...........................................................................16
Future Background Traffic ................................................................................................16
TotalTraffic.....................................................................................................................16
TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS.......................................................................23
Turn Lane Warranting And Queue Length Analysis..............................................................24
SightDistance Analysis.....................................................................................................27
CONCLUSIONS ...............................................................................................................28
LIST OF REFERENCES.....................................................................................................29
TECHNICAL APPENDICES...............................................................................................30
CIVTech August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 — Level of Service Criteria for Controlled Intersections................................10
Table 2— Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service.........................................................11
Table3 — Intersection Crash Data Summary.............................................................12
Table4—Trip Generation..........................................................................................14
Table 5— Site Trip Distribution .................................................................................16
Table 6— Peak Hour Levels of Service.......................................................................23
Table 7— Driveway Right-Turn Lane Analysis...........................................................24
Table 8—AASHTO Sight Distance Requirements ......................................................27
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure1 —Vicinity Map................................................................................................4
Figure 2— Existing Lane Configurations and Stop Controls........................................8
Figure 3 — Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...........................................................9
Figure 4—Site Plan and Access.................................................................................15
Figure5 —Trip Distribution.......................................................................................17
Figure 6 —Site Generated Traffic Volumes................................................................18
Figure 7 — 2024 Background Traffic Volumes ...........................................................19
Figure 8— 2027 Background Traffic Volumes ...........................................................20
Figure 9 — 2024 Total Traffic Volumes ......................................................................21
Figure 10 — 2027 Total Traffic Volumes ....................................................................22
Figure 11 — Proposed Lane Configurations and Traffic Control.................................26
CIVTech L August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Alliance Residential Company proposes the development of a 275-unit multi-family residential
complex located south of US-60 (Superstition Freeway) and east of Goldfield Road on property that
is currently undeveloped desert landscape. Access to the site is provided by four (4) future access
points along Resort Boulevard and one (1) future access point along Chevron Access.
CivTech, Inc. has been retained by Alliance Residential Company to perform the traffic impact
analysis for the proposed development. The purpose of this assessment is to address the traffic and
transportation impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding streets and intersections.
The following conclusions and recommendations have been documented in this study.
GENERAL
• The proposed development is anticipated to generate 2,038 daily trips, 124 (30 in/ 94 out)
trips during the AM peak hour, and 139 (89 in/ 51 out) trips during the PM peak hour.
• The existing zoning of the site would be anticipated to generate 7,596 weekday daily trips,
564 (388 in/ 176 out) trips during the AM peak hour, and 747 (294 in/ 453 out) trips during
the PM peak hour.
o The proposed land uses generate approximately 5,558 fewer daily trips, 439 (359 in/
80 out) fewer AM peak hour volumes, and 602 (203 in/ 399 out) fewer PM peak hour
trips than the existing zoning allows.
CRASH HISTORY
• In total, there were 13 incidents within the study area from 2018-2020. There was a total of
15 injuries and 4 fatalities.
EXISTING
• The results of the existing conditions analysis indicate that all study intersections operate
with acceptable levels of service (LOS B or better).
OPENING YEAR
• The results of the Synchro analysis indicate that all study intersections operate with overall
acceptable levels of service (LOS B or better) with the lane configurations and stop controls
as shown in Figure 11.
2027 CAPACITY ANALYSIS
• The results of the Synchro analysis indicate that all study intersections operate with overall
acceptable levels of service (LOS B or better) with the lane configurations and stop controls
as shown in Figure 11.
CIvTech 1 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
QUEUE STORAGE
• The recommended storage lengths are provided for study horizon year 2027 using the total
traffic projections.
SIGHT DISTANCE
• Sight visibility should be provided at all driveways according to the distances and sight
triangles at public intersections should be maintained according to Section 10-3-4 of the City
Code.
C*1vTech 2 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Alliance Residential Company proposes the development of a 275-unit multi-family residential
complex located south of US-60 (Superstition Freeway) and east of Goldfield Road on property that
is currently undeveloped desert landscape. Access to the site is provided by four (4) future access
points along Resort Boulevard and one (1) future access point along Chevron Access. The vicinity of
the site is provided in Figure 1.
CivTech, Inc. has been retained by Alliance Residential Company to perform the traffic impact
analysis for the proposed development. The purpose of this assessment is to address the traffic and
transportation impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding streets and intersections.
STUDY REQUIREMENTS
This study analyzes the traffic impact due to the proposed complex on the surrounding street
network. The study has been prepared in conformance with the Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT) Trafc Engineering Guidelines and Processes (TGP) Section 240 Traffic
Impact Analysis and Statement, August 2021. The specific objectives of the study are:
• To determine whether the planned street system in the vicinity of the site is adequate to
accommodate the increased traffic that results from the proposed development.
• To recommend additional street improvements or traffic control devices, where necessary, to
mitigate the additional site-generated traffic; and,
• Evaluate the internal site circulation and provide recommendations if necessary.
STUDY AREA
The study area has been defined as including the following intersections:
• Goldfield Road & Old West Highway • Goldfield Road & US 60/Old West Highway Exit
• Goldfield Road & US 60 WB Off-Ramp • Goldfield Road & US 60 EB Off-Ramp
• Goldfield Road & Chevron Access • Goldfield Road & Resort Boulevard
• Chevron Access & Resort Boulevard
HORIZON YEARS
This study has been conducted to conform to ADOT TGP 240 Traffic Impact Analysis and Statement,
prepared by ADOT in August 2021. Based on trip generation rates in the 111" edition of the Institute
of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, the proposed development is anticipated
to generate more than 100 but less than 500 trips during the highest peak hour. Therefore, ADOT
requires the TIA for this development to evaluate the opening year and three years after build-out.
It is assumed that the complex will open during 2024.
CIVTech 3 August 2022
}r31 { a
010-0144
€ 3 NORTH
P 1I N �t L
p C o u V "}e
V
�o
`4
O/ Pq
NZ
Cm
c� �y1aj
wsRam
p
chevron Access '"60
Resort Blvd
SITE
€
Figure I.-
r
Vicinity a
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
EXISTING CONDITIONS
LAND USE
The existing site is an approximately 17-acre section consisting of 7 parcels of undeveloped desert
landscape.
SURROUNDING LAND USE
Surrounding the site are primarily single-family residential developments and retail uses.
Approximately a mile north of the site is Mountain View Lutheran Church, Crossroads Southern
Baptist Church, and some single-family homes. The existing Chevron gas station is located in an
outparcel on the western edge of the project area and southeast of the site is a mobile home resort.
East of the site is predominantly undeveloped land with single-family residential homes east of Mountain
View Road. West of the site is more single-family homes and Golden Vista 55+ Resort. Per TGP 240,
the project corresponds to a 'Small Development' and would require a Category I analysis. Such a
TIA requires analysis of site access driveways and "adjacent signalized intersections and/or major
unsignalized street intersections within a minimum of 1/2 mile."
ROADWAY NETWORK
The existing roadway network within the study area includes Goldfield Road, Old West Highway, US-
60 Highway, Chevron Access, and Resort Boulevard.
Goldfield Road is a north-south road classified by the City of Apache Junction as a principal arterial
roadway. South of Old West Highway, Goldfield Road consists of two travel lanes in each direction
with a center two-way-left-turn lane (TWLTL); north of Old West Highway, Goldfield Road consists of
only one lane in each direction of travel. Goldfield Road begins at the intersection with Baseline
Road, south of the US 60, and continues north until terminating at the intersection with Lost
Dutchman Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph) within the vicinity of the
site.
Old West Highway is a southeast-northwest road classified by the City of Apache Junction as a
principal arterial. Old West Highway consists of two lanes in each direction of travel and a bicycle lane,
separated by a 65-foot median along the entire length of road. Old West Highway begins east of the
intersection with State Route (SR) 88 after transitioning from Apache Trail and continues southeast
until merging with Goldfield Road at the northeast corner of the proposed site. The posted speed limit
is 45 mph within the vicinity of the site.
US 60 (Superstition Freeway) is an east-west United States highway north of the proposed site.
Just east of the Goldfield Road interchange, US 60 is a divided highway with two travel lanes in each
direction separated by a 45-foot raised median. West of the Goldfield interchange, the US 60
becomes an access-controlled freeway. US 60 provides direct access to SR-202, SR-87, SR-101, SR-
79, SR-188, I-10, and Old West Highway via an off-shoot just before the Goldfield Road interchange.
The posted speed limit is 65 mph within the vicinity of the site.
Chevron Access is a curvilinear unmarked driveway with a width large enough for one (1) lane of
travel in direction. Chevron Access is located east of Goldfield Road and north of Resort Boulevard.
There is no posted speed limit.
CIvTec "1 5 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
Resort Boulevard is an east-west local road with one (1) lane in each direction of travel. Resort
Boulevard begins east of Goldfield Road and terminates approximately 860-feet east of Chevron
Access where it becomes Dolce Vista Way. There is no posted speed limit.
INTERSECTION CONFIGURATION
The intersection of Goldfield Road and Old West Highway (SE bound lanes) is a three-legged
unsignalized "T" intersection with a stop sign on the southwest-bound approach. The southeast-bound
approach consists of one dedicated left turn lane and two (2) through lanes. The southbound approach
consists of a dedicated left turn lane only. Please note that the left turn lane intersects Goldfield Road
"behind"a waiting westbound vehicle. Therefore, the movement is considered to be an approach to the
next intersection.
The intersection of Goldfield Road and Old West Highway(NW bound lanes) operates as a three-
way/four-legged unsignalized intersection with a stop sign on the southwest-bound approach. The
northwest-bound approach consists of two through lanes and a bicycle lane; there is a "no left turn"sign
on this approach and right turns are channelized. The southeast-bound approach is a single left turn
lane. The southwest-bound approach consists of one through lane and a dedicated right turn lane. The
through lane goes across this intersection to allow for left turns onto southeast-bound Old West
Highway.
The intersection of Goldfield Road and US 60/01d West Highway Exit operates as an unsignalized
"T" intersection with stop control on the westbound approach. The northbound and southbound
approach consist of two (2) through lanes. The westbound approach consists of one (1) dedicated right-
turn lane. The US-60 WB off ramp is a one-way road that allows access to the northbound Goldfield
Road or northwest-bound Old West Highway,
The intersections of Goldfield Road and US 60 Ramps operate as a diamond traffic interchange
within the vicinity of the site with protected-permitted left turn phasing on the northbound and
southbound approaches. The northbound approach consists of one dedicated left turn lane, two through
lanes and one dedicated right turn lane. The westbound approach consists of one dedicated left turn
lane, one shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane and one dedicated right turn lane. The southbound
approach consists of one (1) dedicated left turn lane, two (2) through lanes and a dedicated right turn
lane. The eastbound approach consists of an exclusive left turn lane, one (1) shared left-
turn/through/right-turn lane, and one dedicated right turn lane.
The intersection of Goldfield Road and Chevron Access operates as a four-legged unsignalized
intersection with stop control in the eastbound and westbound approach. The northbound approach
consists of two (2) through lanes and one (1) dedicated right-turn lane. The southbound approach
consists of one (1) through lane and one (1) shared through/right-turn lane. The eastbound and
westbound approach consist of one (1) shared left/through/right-turn lane.
The intersection of Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard operates as a "T" intersection with
stop control in the westbound approach. The northbound approach consists of one (1) through lane
and one (1) shared through/right-turn lane. The southbound approach consists of two (2) through
lanes and a TWLTL that allows storage for left-turns. The westbound approach consists of one (1)
shared left/right-turn lane.
C i v T e c h 6 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
The intersection of Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard operates as a "T" intersection with
stop control in the southbound approach. The southbound approach consists of one (1) shared
left/right-turn lane. The eastbound approach consists of one (1) shared left-turn/through lane. The
westbound approach consists of one (1) shared through/right-turn lane.
The existing intersection lane configurations and traffic control is illustrated in Figure 2.
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
CivTech engaged Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc. to record traffic volumes at seven (7) study
intersections within the project vicinity. Peak hour volume turning movement counts were performed
from 7:00-9:00 AM and 4:00-6:00 PM on Thursday, July 13, 2022. Peak hour turning movement
counts were conducted at the following study intersections:
• Goldfield Road & Old West Highway • Goldfield Road & US 60 WB Off-Ramp (north)
• Goldfield Road & US 60 WB Off-Ramp • Goldfield Road & US 60 EB Off-Ramp
• Goldfield Road & Chevron Access • Goldfield Road & Resort Boulevard
• Chevron Access & Resort Boulevard
The existing traffic volumes observed for this study are presented in Figure 3 for the weekday AM
and PM peak hours. Traffic volume data obtained for this study have been included in Appendix B.
C*1 v T e c h 7 August 2022
� to��� t
4%
} 4t" r4 LEGEND NORTH
13 7
Thru or Turning Movement Traffic Signal
a
Two-Way Left Turn-Lane Stop Sign
Raised Median Aq P"'. Seed Limit
Yield Sign
0 Bike Lane Qf�y
Channelized Turn LaneEV
t
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB X °
4
4' "n�'�Bi#LNW:grfifiattSY�Si+h+7t4.W.%'hWLWSW'P?P%WWWWiu`"v"c":'{'3�Jd�'rt`"'tW,3�'U%t daT7tiu{,"a,`!"(%'s£Y7"i84}YStW¢FW4W.sk}v1+%ie�d+8£vfifi"> W%')fk"aW`aWtW::Si Yd4fNFLSi�.rck};ft`a'k"%i';ft'.?.6'^"'"%3S)"P?Y'§.Bk,F a'3`{�"21kN8?+hr<r
l ui�y!ytSyt,%r,SY U5';7PWti+',i
Wti&
eW4fttil&vT{i3.WttfiStfW%f;'�?���'3fPdtStkW4a`R?'�!M`%"§tWR!sir"UW"tte"%ai'sJ";W'F:+W"fk`S,sNttSWWWsW'�R ''fG7G.;S"u'%'it6".iCi3a;�.�'��`�'yW&N`YfiYFSZd#.di:A+S°:,WASWsi+4r�°w>F,St;§':W;dM1�S%'2FA'ai rtW"yY uYaB,"%F'{4W4�lkS4d444 .,a d.,;Is,�Wy�ys-
..._ bRamp
Chevron AccessdyQ
6` S
Resort Blvd
SITE
r Yh"i trT"nt�t `
r 35
Goldfield Rd&US-60/Old West Hi hway Exit
Aft
On
�i fit. 4tr l.
t s,
{
s art
i.rs{r�z�tjsr},�t{sS�ef,trr. tiLg;;Y4f4tYr���,+L,�3Lrr,
Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramps Goldfield Road and US-60 EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
Figure 2.- Existing n nfi r ti s
and Traffic controls
�n.
® • r ® ® ® ® ®® ® CivTech
� ,
,Nk,,,
: r A
o�V4 N
I ,
a
cc: 0/
..
( Legend NORTH �..../,1
:.._ __�: ...�.- ..._..._._.� XX(XX)-AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes _
'. WB Ramp
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB
. .t��.:u>sasa*�r�2a':.sth�,;�t. rsss�s«s+r='.,txe'}z'ns^aitrr�rr✓nscrrr .rzrewaw,.nut�.:�$wa Hr~"iutr>vw��, ,snsscz x�azsnmxsm sel'„ yae u �+: utc ,x :sr xrees„
P ,
EB Ramp
� ssg� ki.
Chevron Access -w 60
Resort Blvd. SITE
Goldfield Rd&US-60/Old West Highway Exit
--------------------------
2
{
F:
f'
rl f
� 1
i
Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramps Goldfield Road and US-60 EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
Figure t Existing TrafficVolumes
• • • • • ® ® ®® ® CivTech
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Peak hour capacity analyses have been conducted for the study intersections based on existing
intersection configurations and traffic volumes. All intersections have been analyzed using the
methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM), Updated 2016, Special Report 209,
and using Synchro software, version 11.0 under the HCM 6th edition (2016) methodology.
The concept of level of service (LOS) uses qualitative measures that characterize operational
conditions within the traffic stream. The individual levels of service are described by factors that
include speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.
Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility for which analysis procedures are available.
They are given letter designations A through F, with LOS A representing the best operating
conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions.
Levels of service for intersections are defined within ranges of average control delay per vehicle, the
number of seconds a vehicle can expect to wait due to the presence of a traffic control device.
Table 1 lists the level of service criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections, respectively.
Table 1 — Level of Service Criteria for Controlled Intersections
. .
A <_ 10 <_ 10
..................................................................................................................................................................i......................................................................................_.
B > 10-20 > 10-15
........ _::
C > 20-35 > 15-25
..........................................................................:............................................___.....________________.._................................_........_.._...._.................................
D > 35-55 > 25-35
..: .....:: _...::: _...:: __...>
E > 55-80 > 35-50
.. ......... ......... ......... ........ .........( .J. ......_.. ....... ......... ( ._..� ..). .........
F > 80 or v c> 1 > 50 or v c > 1
Source:Exhibits 19-8,20 2,21-6,and 22-6,Highway Capacity Manual, 611 Edition(2016)
Synchro 11.0 software calculates the LOS per the HCM 6th edition (2016) methodology. The 61h
edition HCM documents the signalized LOS calculation methodology which takes into account lane
geometry, traffic volumes and cycle length/phasing to compute LOS. Synchro analysis worksheets
report individual movement delay/LOS and overall delay/LOS for signalized intersections;
unsignalized intersection worksheets report the worst-case delay/LOS and the average overall
intersection delay. Results of the existing level of service analyses are shown in Table 2 for both AM
and PM peak hours. The existing conditions analysis worksheets have been included in Appendix C.
C*1vTech 10 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
Table 2— Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service
Bill
® ® ® .
Goldfield Road and Old West Highway SEB 1-way Stop (WB) WB Left A (A)1 )
EB Thru B (B)
2 Goldfield Road and Old West Highway NWB 2-way stop (EB/WB) WB Thru B(B)
WB Right A(A)
3 Goldfield Road and US-60/Old West Highway Exit 1-way stop (WB) WB Right A (A)
NB A(A)
(A)
A
4 Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramp Signal SB WB A(a)
Overall A(A)
NB _ _A(A)
(A)
5 Goldfield Road and US-60 EB Ramp Signal SB EB A A (D)
Overall B (B)
NB Left A(A)
6 Goldfield Rd &Chevron Access 2-way stop (EB/WB) SB Left A(A)
EB Shared A(A)
WB Shared A(A)
7 Goldfield Road & Resort Boulevard 1-way stop (WB) SB Left A (A)
WB Shared A (A)
8 Chevron Access &Resort Boulevard 1-way stop (SB) SB Shared A (A)
EB Left A(A)
The results of the existing conditions analysis summarized in Table 2 indicate that all study
intersections operate with acceptable levels of service (LOS B or better).
FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Upon review of the City of Apache Junction ongoing construction projects and current ADOT projects,
there are no additional improvements proposed by ADOT or the City or Apache Junction within the study
area.
CRASH HISTORY
Crash data for the study area was obtained from the City of Apache Junction for the last three (3)
calendar years for which data is available (2018-2020). Crash data for all study intersections were
provided. In total, there have been 13 incidents within the study area since the beginning of 2018.
All crashes occurred at intersections along the length of Goldfield Road within the vicinity of the site.
The summary of intersection crash data is presented in Table 3.
CIVTech 11 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
Table 3 — Intersection Crash Data Summary
Rollo
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............................................................................................................................... ......................................... .............................................................................................................................I...........................
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB s 3 1 2 0 ' 4 1 0± 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
-- .: . - - - .I......: _. ._..:.. _ -_--_. .... .: ... ....w.._. .._
Goldfield Rd &Old West Hwy Exit 6 0 2 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0
----------- ----- ------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramp 4 2 0 1 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0
_..__.: _ ._:. ... .. -_---_ ..
Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
----..-- _ ....: ----:..... --- ._... ..
Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chevron Access&Resort Blvd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The crash analysis worksheets are included in Appendix D.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
SITE LOCATION
The Alliance Residential Company proposed plan consists of a 17-acre multi-family residential
complex located south of US-60 and east of Goldfield Road on currently undeveloped land. The
complex is composed of approximately 275 proposed multi-family dwelling units (DU).
SITE DENSITY/INTENSITY
This development consists of approximately 275 units of proposed multi-family apartment complex.
The complex is comprised of the following:
• 3 Bedroom Townhomes — 82 DU's
• 2 Bedroom Apartments — 104 DU's
• 1 Bedroom Apartments — 89 DU's
SITE ACCESS
There is a total of five (5) proposed access points.
• Access A — is a full movement access located approximately 100 feet east of Goldfield Road
along Chevron Access.
• Access B— is a full movement access located approximately 445 feet east of Goldfield Road
along Resort Boulevard.
• Access C— is a full movement access located approximately 735 feet east of Goldfield Road
along Resort Boulevard.
CIVTE'ch 12 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
• Access D— is a full movement access located approximately 925 feet east of Goldfield Road
along Resort Boulevard.
• Access E— is a full movement access located approximately 1055 feet east of Goldfield Road
along Resort Boulevard.
The proposed development site plans are provided in Figure 4.
TRIP GENERATION
The potential trip generation for the proposed development was estimated utilizing the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and Trip Generation Handbook,
3'd Edition. The ITE Trip Generation Manual contains data collected by various transportation
professionals for a wide range of different land uses. The data are summarized in the report and
average rates and equations have been established that correlate the relationship between an
independent variable that describes the development size and generated trips for each categorized
land use. The report provides information for daily and peak hour trips. The anticipated trip
generation is summarized in Table 4. Detailed trip generation calculations are provided in
Appendix E.
[Remainder of Page Left Intentionally Blank]
C-IvTech 13 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray-Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
Table 4-Trip Generation
Proposed Proposed Alliance Residential Complex
............. ....... ........ ................
.. ..........
n Single-Family Rental nits .......................Apartments- -- --......................... ..........D U s........... g6y-o- o6�. ...........6.j�%o......................js.-............
..................... .................... --------------I--------------- ----------------- ------------ ................. ................
Existing ZonedLand Use
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................
Lot 1: Sit Down Restaurant 931 Sit Down Restaurant 10.803 KSF 55% 45% 61% 39%
------- -- -------------------------------_---------------------------------------------___ --------- -------------- -------------
Lot 3: Hotel or Motel 310 Hotel 178 Rooms 56% 44% 51% 49%
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................
Lot 4: Medical Office 720 Medical-Dental Office 8.276 KSF 79% 21% 30% 70%
................ ---------------------I I—— ------------------------- _. :-I..... . I..........
Lot 5: Medical Office 720 Medical-Dental Office 8.102 KSF 88% 12% 17% 83%
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................
Lot 6: Medical Office 720 Medical-Dental Office 7.928 KSF 79% 21% 30% 70%
.......................I................ ------------------11 1---------------------I------------- ..........------ --------------- ................ ................................
Lot 7: Sit Down Restaurant 931 Sit Down Restaurant em 0
6. 7 KSF 800/( 200% 67% 33%
........... .............. %. ....... 0 ...........
Lot 8: Medical Office 720 Medical-Dental Office 100.014 F 70
Proposed Alliance Residential Complex
........................................... ...........
Single...-..Family.....k...e...n...t..a....L.......�.it...s.........................7...4. i -- -- b-.-4-5... ..........3...0.......................9.....4............ i.2..".-..-.... 6_.�6 ............64........................�f....................1...3...9
. ---- . ... .. ......I.... . . .. ---------- --- .............
.
Existing Zoned Land Use
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Lot 1:Sit Down Restaurant 107.2 1,158 9.57 57 46 103 9.05 60 38 98
..........................................................:..... . ....I... .. ., I I I..............-------I...................................I.,.............. ---------------------------1 11 1............. -------------I------------- ...........................
Lot 3: Hotel or Motel 7.99 1,426 0.46 46 36 82 0.58 53 51 104
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Lot 4:
.................M....e...d...i..c..a...l...O....f..f..i.c..e 29.92 248 3.09 21 5 26 3.6..9........-------------I9--- --- ..... 22-- 31
... I ---I. . .- ----- ......I---- ............
Lot 5: Medical Office 29.64 240 3.10 20 5 25 3.93 10 22 32
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Lot 6: Medical Office 29.35 232 3.10 20 5 25 3.93 9 22 31
............I.......................... ............................... ................................................. ------------- ----------------------- ------------- ................................
Lot Sit..D.own Restaurant J.97:.?.......... 9.57 34 28 62 9.05 35 23 58
..... ............................................... .................................................................... ......................................................................................................�4�
Lot 8: Medical Office 36.0 3,600 2.41 190 51 3.93 118 275
Total Proposed Trips 2,038 30 94 124 89 51 139
.................. ................................................... ...................... ......................................I................. ..................................... ........
Total Existing Zoned Trips 1 7,596 388 176 564� 294 45'3.....................747
Proposed Difference 5,558. 359 80 439 203 399 602
Notes: *All average rates were calculated by dividing total trips generated using regression equation by the number of dwelling units. (See below.)
KSF= 1,000 square feet;DUs=Dwellin2 Units
IN ,III 111 0
Apartments[275 DU] TDay= 275*7.41 = 2,038 TAM = 275*0.45 = 124 Tpm= 275*0.5 = 139
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ........................................................................................
Restaurant[10.803 KSF] TDay= 10.803*107.2= 1,158 TAM= 10.803*9.57= 103 TPm 10.803*9.05=98
....................I................... I--------------1 11 ------------------- ---------- -----------------------I I-------------------------- ----...----- ............ ..................I.,..............I.- I., I
Hotel [178 DU] TDay= 178*7.99= 1,426 TAM= 0.5*178-7.45= 82 Tpm 0.74*178-27.89=104
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Medical[8.276 KSF] TDay=42.97*8.276 108.01 = 248 TAM=0.9*LN(8.276)+ 1.34 26 Tpm 4.07*8.276-3.17=31
_I..... ..................... ............... ...................... ...........
Medical[8.102 KSF] TDay=42.97*8.102-108.01 = 240 TAM 8.102*3.1 25 TPm = 8.102*3.93 32
.................................................................----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medical
.............I..... [7.928 KSF].. TDay=42.97*7.928-108.01 232 TAM 0.9*LN(7.928)+ 1.34=2..5... .. Tpm=7.928*.3.93 =31
.... I..... - ---- I---- ------- ... ...- I I -----I.. .... .... .... .. . .........
Restaurant[6.447 KSF] TDay=6.447*107.2= 692 TAM =6.447*9.57= 62 TPm = 6.447*9.05 = 58
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Medical [100.014 KSF] I TDayi 100.014*36=3,600 TAM=0.9*LN(100.014)+ 1.34=2411 Tm= 100.014*3.93=393
The proposed development is anticipated to generate 2,038 daily trips, 124 (30 in/ 94 out) trips
during the AM peak hour, and 139 (89 in/ 51 out) trips during the PM peak hour. By comparison, the
existing zoning of the site would be anticipated to generate 7,596 weekday daily trips, 564 (388 in/
176 out) trips during the AM peak hour, and 747 (294 in/ 453 out) trips during the PM peak hour.
The proposed land uses generate 5,558 fewer daily trips, 439 (359 in/ 80 out) fewer AM peak hour
volumes, and 602 (203 in/ 399 out) fewer PM peak hour trips than the existing zoning allows.
C*1 v T e c h 14 August 2022
NORTH
3G 36 33 3G 3G 3
I:i 7 4 G 6
y ., 36 36
jv
313 Q� 3G 3G 3G 36 36 313 9G i 3G
-- --_ -- — _
go U r
-u t
r t
o
I
� � s
i
f`
I i Y to !
Y
s
N
Y 1 3G
Y
iG Y
2 2 '.
p I I Y
4WJ
Y
2 2
Y 4 Y Y ( 3G
II
3G
i
Y
� 3G P 4 Y
j,
3G
I
I I I 30
313 3G 3G 3G 36 36 f
I I i 3G 36
1 Y Y Y 1 1 2 P 1 2 2 3G
I � j
I i 3G t
I I
I I 1 y
� i 3G Y Y 2 117 1 7 PAY 2 3G I
1 �
'I r
3G
I G� 3G
3
G
1,
r
� 3G
'+ 3G i I I 1
.i < C
i I I 1
1
_1) �_
3G r
�I
3G 3G
p0ll
44 i 3G I
00 =
38
Q 3G 3G 38 5G 3G 36 36
4V i 1 I 39
31; y i
1 I 3G
dG 1
36 2 Y Y
I t I 36
Figure 4.-
t
Site Plan and Access
e • e ® • 3617
® tspol I ® , ® CivTech
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
VEHICLE TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
A single trip distribution pattern was assumed for the proposed development. It is expected that the
proposed development will generate trips based on future employment within a 7-mile radius of the
site. Future total employment within a 7-mile radius of the site, as projected by the 2030 socio-
economic data compiled by the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), was used as a basis to
estimate trip distribution. The resulting trip distribution percentages for the study area are shown in
Table S. The trip distribution calculations are included in Appendix F.
Table 5 — Site Trip Distribution
North on Goldfield Road (north of Old West Highway) 5%
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Northwest on Old West Highway(west of Goldfield Road) 25%
_....::. .......:.......__.............._...-.............._......._..:::..._.._.............._...............:__...............::...................:......._........:::...................::.............
......::.:.
East on US-60 (east of Goldfield Road) 65%
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
West on US-60 (west of Goldfield Road) 5%
Total 100%
Figure 5 illustrates the trip distribution percentages noted in Table 5 on the roadway network
within the study area. The percentages presented in Figure 5 were applied to the site trips
generated to determine the AM and PM peak hour site traffic at the intersections within the study
area. Figure 6 presents the resulting site generated traffic for the proposed development.
FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC
CivTech took historical daily traffic volumes from the ADOT's Transportation Management System
website to estimate an average annual growth rate. Average daily traffic volumes at US-60 Exit 198
just west of Goldfield Road (Location ID: 6980) were considered. The location experienced an
average annual increase of 1.9% per year from 2018 to 2019. To be conservative, this growth rate
was rounded up so that a 2% annual growth rate (1.040 annual expansion factor for 2024, 1.104 for
2027) was applied to the volumes at the study intersections to obtain the future background traffic
volumes.
The background volumes for the opening year of 2024 are presented in Figure 7. The background
volumes for the horizon year of 2027 are presented in Figure 8. Background traffic calculations are
located within Appendix G.
TOTAL TRAFFIC
Total traffic was determined by adding the site generated traffic to the estimated projected
background traffic. Total peak hour traffic volumes for the opening year of 2024 are shown in
Figure 9. Total peak hour traffic volumes for the horizon year of 2027 are shown in Figure 10.
CIVTE'ch 16 August 2022
0010"
Qf�� NORTH
LEGEND
Trip Distribution
Qc_ Q�Qr
l� s 4 j
yVg Ram
i
n
SiYalm�k:Oil'bskS;tt3S''?�+?"'a�"a'#�i��z
?}`'�5i-U.N`t,s�3?v'';wrsit++iti `sc4tw4✓,''€:'taaGl afti`S�kWit'svri$+n'."(5
Chevron Rccess60
Resort Blvd. F 111,111,111, _M
ITE
� tk
Figure
t Trip Distribution
® . . . . . , CivTech
� �
14
oa
...
w......._ _ _ Legend NORTH L��%t
XX(XX)-AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB WB Ram
s
7{.. ".. G{?YYSinvrt.aw:%'%tY,%'3?fsite',4hBt+t,`%+UGR'.`{5.'%Yf%,"a'm"hk#'^C'%"Sfi't"%"YAF£9}:new,li{ .1ti.bt5'St4u&ik4@'4tA"%„
fL'd4'S'Pa+7uY+Pffi':��u?iF4Pt�{PS3&11f8S?":.P.;lPdr.%kS4!bt"G}1i%'krks;">34ta`Y4Y�'3t"fic*!'%7%itS Ya
Q�.�s�a�w�.aY�7s�tw=ss�."�m�s, af;�rr�'r�ra2a�
... EB Ramp
{
Chevron Access- . • 6 %yr%,5
Resort Blvd
SITE
4
Goldfield Rd&US-60/Old West Highway Exit
------------------------
{ %
t
{
i
y� v
� e
a t i
Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramps Goldfield Road and US-60 EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
i
Access A and Chevron Access Access B and Resort Boulevard Access C and Resort Boulevard Access D and Resort Boulevard Access E and Resort Boulevard
Figure t Site Generated Traffic
a/ 4 1%
espy y
w,.v.
of
Legend NORTH
-----------------------------------------
XX(XX)-AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
WB Ramp
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB
}7.SN�lDhP,t'.k'h3+'t"{.;1PdWkYrS!'S+4tS.?'+X2wYl.P.SiaParZ{SC29t++ '�,`S+ti'tY5 W}dRtt',�tivYt�`h*2+L�^tm'Gh4�i9W.ti;At@�iG'�9YJ;�Nts Si'�"IL?�Y3'fi.Aktd'tii�i's"+�""iE431a t�; §7d88R."�UY
r��ts:�:t,�2z +�2�+�*s�a�,�rxt����..�+�asrn E t"
..... EB Ramp ......_ .. 'krac. R60
Chevron Access•
Resort Blvd. " + 5k
t +
SITEr"
Goldfield Rd&US-60/Old West Highway Exit
------------------
YJ�ts+� f
Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramps Goldfield Road and US-60 EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
Background raffia I
iv c
G u
s Q�aNi
k
f
{
G }i
tt"
t x.„
00 �
Legend NORTH r.
F�
------------------
XX(XX)-AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
........... .. WB Ramp ,,..
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB
wtN'.nhtiYF 3fft;FM1i"55:54a]'dry,".}&?3ikik5}'Yr;NYrtit}i�'tlkS'}:fM14.£;k�fYw"r}.iY"ki="}++'a�l4.ufiS:3+lYM"tt4:�il'i4'ti2>rr.*t.3szNY.}Y,se};}vq; INN'IS(38Sbfl53?}
}} ;.tav,;t;;N4t:, "7pN Nix
g3}NkP'N`N"'Y�4[I'S,'aN"NR 4fla?uZn'99'�Nk:CNN.:fxaitN�.'N`1'YN'NNNa"bPr7X�'4SL}RiaYY,`N'3bi},`N"d7N&s}2"PtN4ikC
'"`7d�sv4}Xt3Gb%WAS'fS"55433'F,f'ih4Y'£FN?&kYY'h3s3.7SPra"+W,fiN'`N%N _....., p
�'^ 1jaa���t�, ua�'n. nus�e,v:z�a, + rm�T' 'r'�' 2rk ''s.q, ,
Chevron Access 60"
Resort Blvd. .w'
SITE ,r
�p
Goldfield Rd&US-60/Old West Highway Exit
-------------
P �
Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramps Goldfield Road and US-60 EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
Background raffia Volumes
1V C
z. 11%,"+
f
. ......................
OS 14%%
i<
� t
Legend NORTHF�%�
XX(XX)-AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB wB
........... .. Ramp "�„'
I
z
k�r�vs Ay��sr
__.,
SVH2&{4tikv'tk"U°t$S$Fit"rk°§26iFYAi"viFhJms"#&4F.`?ttY(St9�,'Xi'Ssl'i;4'+'1�5"&�uFl?�2'. 'Y..„cShR?eixU"kb7'YA`7;8Y��1iW�'u5"S'�'Jt�t'�45'+.4rS++5;',zG�Stlkx"UY!is'3 .wi4:',G4&F3/."{`�fft�}'+4"'IatkSfSN&!+isN343"-i$2irfl4!3�€k{+k,..;f4J±e tl`v1k4;;y',y t}%+4'�".
t: � ;�¢�.�wztws:�tut.'f'.t;AWIusl ON EBR m�$p
Chevron Access r<jQ
Resort Blvd.
ti.
SITE
Goldfield Rd&US-60/Old West Highway Exit
t
Y
Say^`
42�
p
i
I
- I
Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramps Goldtield Road and US-60 EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
r
i •®
I
d
'
Access A and Chevron Access Access Band Resort Boulevard Access C and Resort Boulevard Access D and Resort Boulevard Access E and Resort Boulevard
Figure 2024 Total Traffic
' • • • • • - • ® a® ® n 1 C
O,„ 1%
0/
Legend NORTH �.
o �
}
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB XX(XX)-AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes wa
Ramp
,., v '� 't• . p,`55F,.,i�c24K^f YW"ti¢"�';�;l+.+Y�l3t,`§"�XS4C'2`�`�'htfi!bJSWx?N4k�':%b#RY:YS�1#};fdU7fi4€t";{fOWhi+u"stsk)Y`:�'SS§��s7'sN's''3�ii+"'a%Y 2i„RO.�+�: ,k4' 3�»Y�s�'+�„�+,4p., "4°c�rc�,��'.,,.
14
pp r.�g.,+,.�yz{�3�u4L;�G7k".,'k0;, .�.°Y3�' �MfP�k'41''b1'i4Ux'�"S2K�S"'+'+�` '�R➢%}k`,€IE�s v}`3S?'�."3"&'`"`�M" � �"'3`s$RfiPFkS6(t§k1Wt..e#'�t+"7Y9tt?Y�t?'v55o�n5iS5ii9Yk%3'�ktaII'VYh.�r"Y`rsv
"`is?3X�a ttYz:�sw�"."YJl�kt�/�SkLY+�7ll�°�,:rlhTs•�V§StUh@'S,uSk":'�s'E"�"'�t'�'#'`.",!&'HL�ik§: •
EB Ramp -.... uu,.;y i3
�
Chevron Access
f
Resort Blvd.
17,
3
SITE
Goldfield Rd&US-6U/Old West Highway Exit
v
Goldfield Road and US-6U WB Ramps Goldfield Road and US-6U EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
C
i r
i
7 I i
44
Access A and Chevron Access Access B and Resort Boulevard Access C and Resort Boulevard Access D and Resort Boulevard Access E and Resort Boulevard
Figure s 2027 TotalTraffic
CivTech
t
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
TRAFFIC AND IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS
The overall intersection and approach levels of service are summarized in Table 6 for the 2024 and
2027 background and total traffic conditions. Detailed analysis worksheets for the 2024 background
analysis can be found in Appendix H, worksheets for the 2027 background analysis can be found in
Appendix I, worksheets for the 2024 total traffic analysis can be found in Appendix 3, and
worksheets for the 2027 total traffic analysis can be found in Appendix K.
Table 6 — Peak Hour Levels of Service
IIONNEMSM
i �
• • MR
1 Goldfield Road and Old 1-way Stop WB Left A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
West Highway SEB (WB)
Goldfield Road and Old 2-Way Stop EB Thru B(B) B(B) B(B) B(B)
2 West Highway NWB (EB/WB) WB Thru B(B) B(B) B(B) B(B)
WB Right A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
Goldfield Road and US- 1-way stop
3 60/Old West Highway (WB) WB Right A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
Exit
NB A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
Goldfield Road and US- SB A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
4 60 WB Ramp Signal WB D(D) D(D) D(D) D(D)
Overall A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
NB A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
Goldfield Road and US- SB A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
5 Signal 60 EB Ramp EB D(D) D (D) D(D) D(D)
Overall B(B) B(B) B(B) B(B)
NB Left A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
6 Goldfield Rd& 2-way stop SB Left A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
Chevron Access (EB/WB) EB Shared B(A) B(B) A(A) B(B)
WB Shared` A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
7 Goldfield Road & 1-way stop SB Left A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
Resort Boulevard (WB) WB Shared A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
8 Chevron Access& 1-way stop EB Left A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
Resort Boulevard (SB) SB Shared A(A) A(A) A(A) A(A)
9/A Access A&Resort 1-way stop EB Left A(A) A(A)
Boulevard (SB) SB Shared A(A) A(A)
EB Left A(A) A(A)
10/B Access B&Resort 2-way stop WB Left A(A) A(A)
Boulevard (NB/SB) NB Shared A(A) A(A)
SB Shared A(A) A(A)
11/C Access C&Resort 1-way stop EB Left A(A) A(A)
Boulevard (SB) SB Shared A(A) A(A)
12/D Access D&Resort 1-way stop EB Left A(A) A(A)
Boulevard (SB) SB Shared A(A) A(A)
13/E Access E&Resort 1-way stop EB Left A(A) A(A)
Boulevard (SB) SB Shared A(A) A(A)
CIVTech 23 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
The results of the Synchro analysis summarized in Table 6 indicate that all study intersections
operate with overall acceptable levels of service (LOS 13 or better).
TURN LANE WARRANTING AND QUEUE LENGTH ANALYSIS
RIGHT-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS
The City of Apache Junction Land Development Code, Chapter 10: Engineering Design Guidelines
and Policies do not specify criteria warranting a right turn lane. Therefore, MCDOT guidelines are
considered for this analysis. Per section 7.15 of the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual, a driveway
right-turn deceleration lane is required when either of the following is met:
A. The outside lane has an expected volume of 250 vph or greater and the right turn volume is
greater than 55 vph.
B. Any three of the below criteria are met:
1. At least 5,000 vehicles per day are using or are expected to be using the adjacent street.
2. The roadway's posted speed limit is greater than 35 mph.
3. At least 1,000 vehicles per day are using or are expected to use the driveway.
4. At least 30 vehicles are expected to make right-turns into the driveway within a one-hour
period.
All access points were evaluated under these criteria. The results are shown in Table 7.
Table 7 is a summary of the 2027 peak hour right-turn volumes from the adjacent street onto the
proposed driveways:
Table 7 — Driveway Right-Turn Lane Analysis
III;I III Elio ii i
ill" i IIINg
Access A &Chevron Access No No 7N o No No
------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access B & Resort Boulevard No No No No Yes
.................- ............
Access C & Resort Boulevard No No No No No
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Access D & Resort Boulevard No No No No No
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I.------------------ -1.1.1-.......... ---------------------------------11--------------I I------------------------------
Access E & Resort Boulevard I No No No I No I No
Due to the low expected future traffic volumes and low speed limit on Resort Boulevard & Chevron
Access, neither criterion is met for the intersection. Therefore, a right-turn deceleration lane is not
warranted for the site accesses.
QUEUE STORAGE
Adequate turn storage should be supplied on any approach where turn lanes are permitted and/or
warranted. Per ADOT TGP 430 on Turn Lane Design, the configuration of a turn lane consists of a
taper, an opening or"gap", and the storage length. A formula for calculating the length of the taper
(which may not be required for right turn lanes) is provided in the TGP and the gap is specified in
Table 430-1; both are based on posted or design speed, while the taper calculation also considers
CivTech 24 August 2022
,;�7
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
the width of the lane and whether widening for it will be to one side or symmetrical. The storage is
comprised of two components: braking distance (also specified in TGP 430) and the queue, which
can vary depending on the projected number of turns. There are several methods of determining the
appropriate queue for a turning movement. One common method is outlined in A Policy on
Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (the AASHTO "Green Book', a conservative methodology
in which it is assumed that the turn lane should store the average number of turning vehicles
arriving in a two-minute period, where unsignalized, or, in two signal cycles, where signalized. TGP
430 describes this method (without attributing it to the Green Book) as one way of estimating the
queue, indicating that the minimum queue should be 50 feet (i.e., two passenger vehicles) where
trucks are less than 10% of the total traffic volume of 85 feet (one 25-foot passenger vehicle + one
60-ft long truck) where trucks are greater than 10% of the total traffic volume.
TGP 240 allows/suggests the use of another method, one outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual.
This method is used by the Synchro software to report the 95th percentile number of vehicles to the
back of the queues. CivTech rounds this number up to the nearest whole number of vehicles and
multiplies by 25 feet to convert the number of vehicles to a required queue. The equations used for
the calculations are shown below, and the resulting turn lane storage requirements for the study
intersections are summarized in Table 8. Detailed queue storage calculation worksheets using the
AASHTO method are included in Appendix L. Proposed lane configurations are shown in
Figure 11.
Table 8— ueue Storal a Len the
Ms
Goldfield Road and 1-way SB Left 195' 405' 90' 85' 100, 25' (5)195'
1 Old West Highway Stop WB Left 25' 245' 60' 45' 150' 25' (5>25'
SEB (WB)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Goldfield Road and 2-Way
2 Old West Highway Stop] WB Right 55' 245' 60' 40' 100, <25' (5)55,
NWB (EB/WB)
.. . _11 �. ------ .. .__..: .W----- .._
Goldfield Road and 1-way
3 US-60/Old West Stop WB Right M_ 405' 90' 85' 225' 25' (5)_
HighwayExit (WB)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
NB Left 445' 245' 60' 40' 200'i 25' t5445'
Goldfield Road and WB Left 190, 405' 90' 85' 125' 40' (5�190,
4 US-60 WB Ramp Signal SB Right 140' 245' 60' 40' 250' <25' (5}140'
WB Right_ 185, 405' 90' 85' 150` <25' (5)185
.. -....:.. . .... .....� . _ _ ...:.... .......... .. . - ..._.....n ... - -._1.._
SB Left 440' 245' 60' 40' 325' <25' (5440'
Goldfield Road and EB Left 125' 405' 90' 85' 275' 100, (5)125'
5 US-60 EB Ramp Signal NB Right 120' 245' 60' 40' 150' <25' (5)120'
EB Right 125' 405' 90' 85' 225' 35' (5)125'
--------------------------------------------------------------- .................................... ..................................... ..............................----------------------------------------------------------------------
Goldfield Rd& 2-way NB Left (I)TWLTL 245' 60' 40' 100, <25' (3)TWLTL
6 Stop; SB Left (3)TWLTL 245' 60' 40' 125' 25' (3)TWLTL
Chevron Access (EB/WB) NB Right 75' 245' 60' 40' 100` <25' (5)75'
------ _....: _ -I. ------- _ _..
Goldfield Road& 1-way
7 Resort Boulevar d Stop SB Left (3>TWLTL 245' 60' 40' 175' 25' �3>TWLTL
(WB)
(1) Measured from beginning of stop bar
(2) HCM 95th percentile queue reported in vehicles/lane,assuming 1 vehicle—25 feet.
(3) Two-way-left-turn-lane(TWLTL)provides excess storage for the left-turn lane.
(4) Queue for right turns is an exit road from the US-60.
(5) Existing conditions meet queue storage requirements.
CivT+t ch 25 August 2022
5�
+ Fah LEGEND NORTH13 t
1
Thru or Turning Movement Traffic Signal A �
Two-Way LeftTurn-Lane " Stop Sign
Raised Median Qo', Speed Limit
Bike Lane ' Yield Sign O
r 4rrp'f` — Channelized Turn Lane t
,}......
Development Improvements O F
�F
Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy SEB Goldfield Rd&Old West Hwy NWB
Ram a.
{. aY3Y;5RUk"f}3;4"3k?pytr
1 ,., btFk'{+\Y§AY3fx.Ydtb;'t'rkT".T44;FU7:#i•1�'`51RYaaEY1m'+?3f"liSIY"a L4;23Abt's"d�hC'.ib7;3f 7'"2`tk3?'.�s.3's4`t355)2A".'2{3Y55;i".,`'F4%E4'Ehi!NX&Y1c,hFYi'�vh:}:+"'r"N"4"t`"SYTkU§,W4H`Y.'""WYk Xtt3,F"iitn'G`+
=,gAQ{g5k`,F»' 'i5h.•tit, L/"� 4Y44'n4 "
awzv"'as,r4 o acts^; raa .r'<a
� trt�u,:3yntr����y?tr��p
�r, g ., a� :�u,�t�ntr.�'..�•:a&v�mve���rr ;�awrs~ rer r ss ;�.,zrrtrare�+ ra�+a�ur��:e�es ��s,�aLs`� m
EE Ramp f m,
r
Chevron Access b�0%�
Resort Blvd.
t � ��,
SITE
35
rfY,
Goldfield Rd&US-601O1d West Highway Exit A
tAft
tt b
$ f4E n
t
I � r
t" t4'
r
t
{pr
1
Y �+
�€'1� ��1`'.' 1 rrpy�"�=rysrYttt't45YjlFrsR"��a�tk;#rs%'rtrRts£�3%ti,xt%.r�lY"%Yst%,k�r„t�'r�,,,57H`yAtix`rr jt(4r,L'rt�t
i,"?r�"`hsfy%t�rt✓nrq�+;{.��� �....,t�rr�sr�t�tY!n�4h�x�rr�,tt+�� Y '.,�:r...T,tha����%,t�sr,21 � >r..tt����s#��ra,�"
Goldfield Road and US-60 WB Ramps Goldfield Road and US 60 EB Ramps Goldfield Road and Chevron Access Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard Chevron Access and Resort Boulevard
AWAt
r
t d�gr
t 3
f
v�+
i�
„k
e <
4
I
4'
3 § Y f {}ff4 t
.,.. r r�� ...s a ,�, to ,y. r r , r4 rr., ...•., ,.r w _ ,r w, ...r v r a ,. � r =, r t„W =#,..,.. 7 r., .rrr irY....., t?}, ,...px�,r.�p t'{ ! t[n§Y tt...fr X'tPp44 % t tt : ,t,r.r r _.u+.,.z}"Y{,7 Is;37. ;`.. J6}.S'•k: S. € 4;...p%rt ,4
}1
}�4��r��,aP�ju�•��4p)l
Access A and Chevron Access Access B and Resort Boulevard Access C and Resort Boulevard Access D and Resort Boulevard Access E and Resort Boulevard
Figure i 1 r Proposed Large Configurations
and Traffic controls
CivTech
u
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
Adequate sight distance must be provided at intersections and site access driveways to allow safe
turning movements. There must be sufficient unobstructed sight distance along both approaches of
a street/driveway intersection and across their included corners to allow operators of vehicles to see
each other in time to prevent a collision.
The City of Apache Junction maintains sight distance requirements within their Engineering and
Design Guidelines and Policies Manual. The City of Apache Junction measures sight distance using
AASHTO methodology. Sight distance calculations according to AASHTO guidelines are summarized
in Table 9.
Table 8—AASHTO Sight Distance Requirements
Chevron Access 15/25 265' 310' 225'
Resort iBoulevard 20/30 225' 1 260' 185'
Sight visibility should be provided at all driveways according to the distances shown in Table 9 and
that sight triangles at public intersections are maintained according to Section 10-3-4 of the City
Code. Sight distance worksheets and Section 10-3-4 of the City Code have been included within
Appendix M.
C*1vTech 27 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions and recommendations have been documented in this study.
GENERAL
• The proposed development is anticipated to generate 2,038 daily trips, 124 (30 in/ 94 out)
trips during the AM peak hour, and 139 (89 in/ 51 out) trips during the PM peak hour.
• The existing zoning of the site would be anticipated to generate 7,596 weekday daily trips,
564 (388 in/ 176 out) trips during the AM peak hour, and 747 (294 in/ 453 out) trips during
the PM peak hour.
o The proposed land uses generate approximately 5,558 fewer daily trips, 439 (359 in/
80 out) fewer AM peak hour volumes, and 602 (203 in/ 399 out) fewer PM peak hour
trips than the existing zoning allows.
CRASH HISTORY
• In total, there were 13 incidents within the study area from 2018-2020. There was a total of
15 injuries and 4 fatalities.
EXISTING
• The results of the existing conditions analysis indicate that all study intersections operate
with acceptable levels of service (LOS B or better) with the existing traffic control devices.
OPENING YEAR
• The results of the Synchro analysis indicate that all study intersections operate with overall
acceptable levels of service (LOS B or better) with the lane configurations and stop controls
as shown in Figure 11.
2027 CAPACITY ANALYSIS
• The results of the Synchro analysis indicate that all study intersections operate with overall
acceptable levels of service (LOS B or better) with the lane configurations and stop controls
as shown in Figure 11.
QUEUE STORAGE
• The recommended storage lengths are provided for study horizon year 2027 using the total
traffic projections.
SIGHT DISTANCE
• Sight visibility should be provided at all driveways according to the distances and sight
triangles at public intersections should be maintained according to Section 10-3-4 of the City
Code.
Ci1VTPCh 28 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
LIST OF REFERENCES
Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis
Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2018.
Manual on Uniform Tralfc Control Devices U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highways Administration, Washington, D.C., 2009.
Roadway Design Manual, Maricopa County Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Arizona,
Revised April 2004.
Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington,
D.C., 2017.
Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington,
D.C., 2014.
A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets ("AASHTO Green Book") 61" Edition,
The American Association of Highway Transportation Officials, page 9-127, Washington, D.C., 2011.
CIVTeCh 29 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
TECHNICAL APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES (RESERVED)
APPENDIX B: EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS
APPENDIX C: EXISTING PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
APPENDIX D: CRASH ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX E: TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX F: TRIP DISTRIBUTION CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX G: BACKGROUND GROWTH CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX H: 2024 NO BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
APPENDIX I: 2027 NO BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 3: 2024 BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
APPENDIX K: 2027 BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
APPENDIX L: QUEUE STORAGE ANALYSIS
APPENDIX M: SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
CIVTech 30 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX A
REVIEW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES (Reserved)
,C4'0'--E—E, C i v T e c h
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX B
EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS
C i v T e C h
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
IRCDATA SERVICES OF ARIZOINA,I IO.
520.31GX745
Project #: 22-1400-001
TMC SUMMARY OF Goldfield Rd& O/d West Highway
APPROACH LANES
0
22
11EFIF-1
V
`p a Ln O
0
Old West Highway Old West Highway
AM MD PM TOTAL
w
TOTAL AM MD PM z
35 16 19 CONTROL 0 0 0 =
�0 0 0 s-way stop 0 0 0
0
Q.
O 297 112 185 ss �� 0 0 0 a
z
rn
Ln V
LOCATION#: 22-1400-001
0
z TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
a 00 0 o
Goldfield Rd&Old West Highway
oNA � (Intersection Name)
h o
ce
.� W EDNESDAY 06/29J22
a� Day Date
'a APPROACH LANES
p COUNT PERIODS
AM 700AM - 900AM
NOON
PM 40OPM 60OPM
AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR 400 PM
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
IBCO DATA SERVICES OF ARIZOINA,IrIO.
520.31GX745
Project #: 22-1400-002
TMC SUMMARY OF Goldfield Rd& US-60 WS Off-Ramp(north)
APPROACH LANES
22
�O 11EN__
4- 1�
V
`p a O N O
O
US-60 WB Off-Ramp(north) a o O US-60 WB Off-Ramp(north)
AM MD PM TOTAL
w
TOTAL AM MD PM z
g
0 0 0 � CONTROL 162 110 272
O
�0 0 0 L:::::* s-Way Stop � 0 0 0 �
d
O 0 0 0 WB
z
rn
Ln V
o 0 0
a '4 LOCATION#: 22-1400-002
0
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
a O o
ildfield Rd&US-60 WS Off-Ramp(nori
o H
(Intersection Name)
h Ln o
.�ce WEDNESDAY 06/29J22
a� Day Date
'a APPROACH LANES
p COUNT PERIODS
AM 700AM 900AM
NOON
PM 40OPM 60OPM
AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR 400 PM
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
IRCDATA SERVICES OF ARIZOINA,I IO.
520.31GX745
Project #: 22-1400-003
TMC SUMMAR Y OF Goldfield Rd& US-60 WS Off-Ramp
APPROACH LANES
22
d 11HP- F-1
W
`p C:)
a 01�
s Ln 00 O
O
N O
US-60 WB Off-Ramp c CO US-60 WB Off-Ramp
AM MD PM TOTAL
w
TOTAL AM MD PM z
O O � CONTROL S 2 7 =
�0 0 0 C:::::* O Signal 0 0 0 K
O Ell
0 0 �� 7 19 26 a
z
rn
U0 V
a N O O
LOCATION#: 22-1400-003
0
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
Q M 00 O
Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Off-Ramp
a ❑� (Intersection Name)
oce
.� W EDNESDAY 06J29J22
a� Day Date
'a APPROACH LANES
p COUNT PERIODS
AM 700AM 900AM
NOON
PM 40OPM 60OPM
AM PEAK HOUR 715 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR 500 PM
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
IRCDATA SERVICES OF ARIZOINA,I IO.
520.31GX745
Project #: 22-1400-004
TMC SUMMARY OF Goldfield Rd& US-60 ES Ramps
APPROACH LANES
22
o ❑❑
V
aLr)
0
US-60 EB Ramps Q `' rn US-60 EB Ramps
AM MD PM TOTAL
w
TOTAL AM MD PM z
145 60 85 CONTROL 0 0 0 =
�0 0 0 Signal 0 0 0
0
Q.
o 73 30 43 �� 0 0 0 a
z
rn
Ln V
a - C:>
LOCATION#: 22-1400-004
0
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
a o
Goldfield Rd&US-60 ES Ramps
o H
(Intersection Name)
o
ce
.� WEDNESDAY 06J29J22
a� Day Date
'a APPROACH LANES
p COUNT PERIODS
AM 700AM - 900AM
NOON
PM 40OPM 60OPM
AM PEAK HOUR 715 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR 415 PM
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
IRCDATA SERVICES OF ARIZOINA,IrIO.
520.31GX745
Project #: 22-1400-005
TMC SUMMARY OF Goldfield Rd& Chevron Access
APPROACH LANES
22
011EF- F-1
V
a CT, Ln
00
0
Chevron Access Q M M Chevron Access
AM MD PM TOTAL
w
TOTAL AM MD PM z
g
3 5 CONTROL 21 28 49
2 0 2-way stop 1 0 1 0,
0 1 0 1 EB&wB �� 2 4 6 a
D
S
z
rn
U0 V
a CO
LOCATION#: 22-1400-005
0
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
a o co
Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access
(Intersection Name)
oCie -'
.� WEDNESDAY 06J29J22
a� Day Date
'a APPROACH LANES
p COUNT PERIODS
AM 700AM - 900AM
NOON
PM 40OPM 60OPM
AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR 445 PM
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
IRCDATA SERVICES OF ARIZOINA,I IO.
520.31GX745
Project #: 22-1400-006
TMC SUMMARY OF Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd
APPROACH LANES
o ❑❑ ` o
V
CO a o
O
Resort Blvd c N Resort Blvd
AM MD PM TOTAL
w
TOTAL AM MD PM z
0 0 CONTROL 27 17 44 ?
�0 0 0 C:::::* s-way stop 0 0 0
0
a
O E
0 0 wB �� 2 2 4 a
ll
rn
U0 V
I C) ton Ln
LOCATION#: 22-1400-006
0
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
Q o LNf) M
Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd
o H
(Intersection Name)
0 oO
ce
.� WEDNESDAY 06J29J22
a� Day Date
'a APPROACH LANES
p COUNT PERIODS
AM 700AM - 900AM
NOON
PM 40OPM 60OPM
AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR 445 PM
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
IRCDATA SERVICES OF ARIZOINA,I IO.
520.31GX745
Project #: 22-1400-007
TMC SUMMARY OF Chevron Access& Resort Blvd
APPROACH LANES
y
W N
UHI
OF 111FIR
L
S a
M o 1-4
U
0
Resort Blvd c M Resort Blvd
AM MD PM TOTAL
w
TOTAL AM MD PM z
g
8 6 2 � CONTROL 1 0 1 U
41 14 27 i-way stop 28 10 38
O 0 0 0 sB �� 0 0 0 a
z
rn
Ln V
a LOCATION#: 22-1400-007
0
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
a
o 0 0
Chevron Access&Resort Blvd
a (Intersection Name)
� o HFIF-17
N ~
U
a
W EDNESDAY 06J29J22
pDay Date
y APPROACH LANES
COUNT PERIODS
U
AM 700AM - 900AM
NOON
PM 40OPM 60OPM
AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR 415 PM
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX C
EXISTING PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
,C4'0'--E—E, C i v T e c h
Existing AM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy Existing PM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HOM6thTN5C 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6thTW5C
.s#Zy}t}r<1t,}}>,4{ytt{�ts:xt?4{ytt{�tt f3, r{'t2 ,L,YiiII II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II }$rr7,t#t 7£{ ,'r,Y3i�I�Iffi rJ3�,< !s'�5,� iY�s}{it�'t{s�'t{s�'t{s�'t{sta;f s,r Y�{o1 SFr 11,7Fr 11,7Fr 11,7Fr 11,7Fr 11,7Fr 11,7Fr 11,7Fr 11,7Fr 11,7�{•}:�F.{2etlY lY lY lYf13�k}y`{t},}..
Y,�Sfi?� s<� ��,�2t'f�2}, s,�t}��� if,r,f{e�� I}� r�# ,C��� •�LL •�LL •�LL �t,���)t r' •� )�i, i, i, i, i, i, i, i, 4 }E{'�S ii� i ,�{��iL,�,
Int Delay,srveh 3.8 Int Delay,siveh 2.9
Lz, �ftf}}z1J;`i;1})af til, ,�
tu„ iil,r �h t
Lane Con iguranos tt Lane Carfiguratiom tt
Traffic Val,vah/h 54 i 0 0 0 0 112 TratficVd,cAWh 46 0 0 0 i 0 185
Future Vol,ve" 54 0 0 0 0 112 Future Vol,ve" 46 0 0 0. 0 185
ConfildirgPaxla,ftr 0 0 0 0 0 0 CaMicting Peds,#ft 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
Sign Cottrrol Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RTCt nelmed - None - RTC ndized - Now Now - Nonei
Storage Leah 0 195 Storage Length 0 195
VehinM enStaage,# 0 0 0 VetinIAkanStake,#! 0 0 0
Grade,% o_ , a o Grade,f 0 a _ o
Pc k H Factor 63 63 25 25 91 91 PeakHourFadbor 46 46 25 25 79 79
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
"t How 86 0 0 0 0; 123 My t saw 100 0 0 0 0 234
.,, }. t..,:.,f.rw .t ... r,.._ a,r?? �•x ?? z"S„r -�� rr , e-1-�.
??31{s,t 7.J�jtn7F}?7>tiTt{t}SP1rt�ti 17}> 3Yl tl aj?.f{tstfY}:t, }.}intr(5, ttf S@t?„s?� tf3 F}k },t# I,)�kSS}{?. f>+t£t} jZcr' t },t.{c,t,}} XrFt ) ((rl f.eS,rs {:"{r, }?2155}• r�z.7sr 3,,i1}I,str s,$rr{3,,,Fi i{S„{L,C..
Connidirg RowAl 62 - 0 0 Conflicting Ra Al 117 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 Stage 1 0
Stage 2 62_ _ _ Stage 2 117 _
CkincalHJwy 6,84 4.14 Ckihc�Hdtiy 6.84 4A4
Qiticad Hdwy Stg 1 _ _ Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdvny*2. 5,84 Q%paIHdvnyStg2 5S4
FdiaN-up Hdny 3.52 ? 2.22 - Fdlm-up HchW 3.52 - 2.22
Pat Cap-1%h-arver 937 0 Pot Cap-1 Nkmver 867 0 -
Stage 1 - 0 Stage 1 - 0
Stage2 953 0 StagB2 895 0
Platoon hocked,% e Platoon hocked,% e,
Mov r1 Maneuvv 937 - Mjv Cap-1Maraw 867
Mcv Cap-2 Mara rver 937 - - Nov Cap-2 Maneuver 867 -
Stage 1 - stage 1
Stage 2 953
Stage 2 895 _ e
ft rziz f�f �. r 6J Lzs-t'/I •�ttt tR• r t< .- ?' 1 L SS it r ttu { t s l } t i .t�, {J r .2 r, ,,ff J#3i{1 f l S Y t i r.} •t t E? Y' J J f?r ', s <l S}l 7, S 3 l i s i 4,C, 3 , Z"K }F tSl S J 1 t z S+t, t, t�rr�4u-�i:I<�}�',}•tf�.7 kl��'��{-�{'i t��2rJ,�}c�it� �tli�{`fi�7�.�t,f� ��ff �„��f#5 �}�,Ut44��t�r�`�f�r�'�,{s<t�3art<.7��trtstS�Szrtf3 �{tl+iLm°,S' #F1, }{4�fStf�'f�Y ,4{�,r��}� Y2c},�c�&< ti�' ���r„tt�l)�tt��t3n�Ts�}��},$,ts}t�t.�t fft'�fz}Ink„�${{S{,p�S ��{{#, tX1,�'fSrSt.2,a
HCM G rd Delay,s 9:2 0 HC MC attrd Deday,s 9.7 0
It a..,: ,r,......Lrrz, ,.,; ,�..,t,y.,.. 7.ys.a,} .. .tt• :-} > c r,:f ra t s ,?>., ;sr'sr r'rm 3: r:t �is t t<.tr}}}}P Gfi, Y{ s# ea+ 5124t}tt.tr},1{sJJtt, ,Jr{7J#{ �}kt,t tSctzZ?s lff( (ff t,#�Jtt{1tt} k}{ti>„}�Jt IZf1. h }f l+ ft,#�1J� }Yt:t}�,t��ttittttl,r,d�}t, ir,�,{,1?t irtF�}fir}•tt�tf,trt,?tS}„frtrG „>tit?i
{; t}2� )i� }I�f,�� f{S`Lst}..,3 rLr.tr�`,2k f�ii �}r}�1}Se��•c�31t,f���lf,#f{ �t,2��F,{{�}, ),� ��41r ,e,k£ f i ���,r ,If{S��t��tt��irt�r,{�,.2 t��i{�t,<��t t{'} �:� ��f,t�r} ,8'.fZfyJ Y{rr}}�t.2��� ���zf''.
cq)a*(td-Vh) 937 Capaaty(vem) 867
HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0,091 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0,115 -
HWQxdrd Way(s) 9.2 0 t Ic Lay{s) R7 0
HCM Lane LOS A A FILM Lane LOS A A
HCM h"ldYleC(veh) 03 9 195th°ldileG(veh) 0,4
07114/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/14/2022 Synchro 11 Report
QVTech Inc.-CM Page 1 QVTech Inc.-CM Page 1
Existing AM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy Existing PM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6thTZC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6thTwsC
t t
.�rs� s� s� s� s� s� s� s� s� {s »J f YZ� ti �+}Jk• L s� s� s� s� s� s� s�Int Delay,stveh 35 Int Delay,siveh 3.8
Lane Configurabo s P ° Lane Ccefigurafiors
TraificVd,vahth 0 16 0 " 0 54 9 0 178 28 0 0 0 TraffroVd,veh/h 0 19 0 0 ; 46 5 0 171 49 0 0 0
Future Val,vehJh 0 16 0 0 54 9 0 178 28 0 0 0 Future Vol,vel Jh 0 19 0 0 46 5 0 171 49 0 0 0
Confiding Pam,itfhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 toxttiding Pew,Vhr 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
9F ' twd Norte ' - Stop Yield INIcre RTChahnelimd Nora: Stop r Yield Nate
Storage Length _ 0 0 Storage Length _ 0 0
Veh in Medan Storage,# - 0 0 0 Veh in Stake,# - 0 n 0` 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 _ 0 0 a 0 0 _ 0
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 ' 63 63 63 84 84 64` 25 25 25 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 46 46 46 89 89 W 25 25 25
Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
NMAROW 0 '18 0 0 66 14 0; 212 83 0 0 0 MimtHow 0 24 i 0 0 100 11 0 192 55 0 0 0
.... Y. »t—sJ'. 5 z� .:;. }t i..,�f k k� eee'1,i 3` ....t... ») • 't...`\ !�, ...\».... } `,i»t £-I. »,.._+ Yr t}g,�....( tt.C(r Jr, 2»+, :._ C.rv...S SSS ti... 2 5 t C
Y>t, zY} 5I!!;k Si tY r}t l olds 1\ 15 l}}t tl £ lrt7 tt Y rll F Z,r1 r ,S S.Y t. fl; 1 C.+�t r}Eitr r+tr Irl t},} J55,,t, s3 kt 4zM1 ttt,{ {;
ZI IIIft}l-((�'3 1 rJ) 1,�,£. y} t>tj l.,/.,S13F }})Et Yr,sF{3,}} }l Z1Z}Al} }}+ JAl4} }Jrr�t<,}„�'t�PR) tL,1}}4}7 vC£�t3rlt,rt-2r is SYZt��S SSS r.� 2ZrrtZt l} li S2,s t£, .ts )»Il}1\}tt.�t�yr Y}5..rj,?JtS kr Z�tk 2{z+Y�f7 iL4kiri 2t4
Conflicting HowAII - 212 - - 212 106 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow Al - 192 - - 192 96 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 212 - Stage.1 0 192
Stage _ 212 _. _. .0 _ _ Stage - 192... _ 0
aiiti I kf" 6.54 6S4 6,94 _ C ribcd,)* 6.54 - i6.54 6.94 i
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54 - Qitical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54
Critical H*Slg 2 - 5,54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - &54
Fdlaw-up HJW - 4.02 4.02 3.32 - Follow-up FkNV 4.02 - - 4.02 3.32
Rrtcfir-1 0 4 0 0 684 928 0 cap-1 hh� 0 702 0 0 702 942 0
Stage 0_. 0 0 726 0, _ Sty 1 0 0 0 740 0 _
Stage2 0 726 0 0 0' Ste2 0 740 ', 0 0 0
Platoon blocked,% A Platoon blocked,
Move r-1 E 0reaver - 634 - - 684 928 Mw C 1 Maneuver - 702 - 702 942
Mav Cap-2 lvLaneuver 684 684 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 702 - 702 - -
Stage 1 726 Stage 1 740
Stage 2 726 v Stage 2 740
S;t)Sf 1 tiS fr, tC Jl 1 {�. ) ds„tJ rIt tr lt,y P'S r,4,ttt rU,f 1,£{ )5tS r,} S; 7 Et .$3I# f.. f 113# k:✓) r;tt£Sr St, rrrS S .�7Y 1 Fnl t 1l( ,{ }},S.,Nt f+53}f>l }SSfp z{}}#.r S..
; '1aJl �,tji`}�}t»Sf�ibStt��L£,Iifll�sF�rrliif�#rf€tSj<�Fr:.ttt�,g;nilJ a„�r�it ��•s vr�+�4£�i„��.SS 't� 7��r� 1�k�1kj .��r {,) k&��lS r�`Yf;${a��ir(��rv�,£ztfl )tltb�t)j�>��?�i fL+jrr�rltf�t
HCMContreIDeIay,s 10.4 10,7 0; HCviCotrd Delays 10.3 108 y 0
HC
M M LOS B B HCM LC6 B B
}r. .»Ly}YtII j}J t E Slk{;tEr�t,rtlyts�s��k,t�itt5tj,a5jj}�i2k1}�frv£(t r rttli l�,{})t Eke'#iz1,�3gaE}j 5 tr ,yet ,;str5}�,,{+t t5rf t, x77ill�;ttc�{{Lt��a1r;#strtlF L>lhis,rrt �sjt Et)„�#sk},<t�;Zlfl"i r air}�ftjll))3);artj#�sl;£rr:�,tJr.
Cepacity(veh+h) 684 684!928 Capacity(velvh) 702 702 942"
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0,026 0,125 0.015 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0,034 0,142 0.012
FCIVlCdntreI De*(s) 104 11 8.9 HOVICo trol Delays) 10.3 11 8,9
HCM Lane LC6 B B A HCM Lane LC6 - B B A
HCM9ahl�leC( ) 0,1 0A 0 HCM951h°14fleQ,veh) 0.1 0.5 0
07114/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07l1412022 Synchro 11 Report
QVTech Inc.-CM Page 2 QVTech Inc.-CM Page 2
Existing AM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60t01d West Hwy Exit Existing PM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60t01d West Hwy Exit
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM6thTWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM6thTWSC
; r} } } } } } v v{ i. .».;,•., S k} t f , { { { { i t.{i , { { {3 ,kr Y Int Delay,sfveh 4 Int Delay,stveh 2
a t,,,,,r�.�s,,.,,.»F,...:a'a:.....,.i.}..............................„.�.rr..........rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, tt:�,..,,t„i,,...rrrrrrrr.�...,,,,......... ......„4............rr.........„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4......„4.......;.......;.......;.......;.......;......,.„..
T 1 T•* YY J ., >,=.t.=.t.=.t.=.t.=.t.=.t,=.t,=.t,=.t.=.t.=.t.=.t.=.t.=.t,=.t,=.t,=.t.=.t.=. l 4 §; { s =J 3k \$ z a. t».
}i}�r��t„�#� �£ � i.} �1 � it����t � � � � � � � } ,„� ��{i�,4 ty ft331� �. 1 �t..+I, , „»� ,�3 ct}�ttlsrlsrrlsrlsrrlsrlsrrlsrlsrrlsrlsrrlsrlsrrlsrlsrrlsrlsrrlsrlsrrn�P� 1,
LaneCcdguratiom r tt tt Lane CcrAgurations r tt tt
TraflicVd,vWh 0 162 44 0 0 166 TraftVa, ih 0 110 110 0 0 231
Future Vol,vehJh 0 162 44 0 0 166 Future Vol,velyb 0 110 110 0 0 231
Conflicting Pe.,Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflic#irgP,eds,#lhr ; 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RTChannelized None we We RT zed - floe - - 6
Storage Length 0 Storage Length 0
VVehin Madan StoraW# 0 0 0 VehinMaS tStorage# 0 0 0
Grade, 0 e 0 0 ,% a _ o - 0
Peak Hour Facto 82 82 58 58 87 87 PeakHourFactor 84 84 86 86 68 68
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Iv1,ntt Flow 0 498 76 0 0 191 Mm Row 0 131 ,128 0 0 340
.. ,,, N;1v >y r r•_.,' .„}'.. £ 'aia C t, _r tt,� _:... 3 1c... lt^:5 �•
t {v f£3 4, t iF£ £ ,„43 Sr 1.s ++ lfi Zz 5S fi c l\}} 13 zi§. ,T l k h 'T t�""+•ss1 �.F,F "' ,� i 111,tYx} z 7�cC S{' \,»"5 ! St7 TSS>Sr}?g c:s t;z+f
7{{ i.ttZ }�� 4 ,��;..t,{{{F z„ ij i��F#,ltrn2rJ11}'ili,}lJnf }1 T7\§#1 {{� }{ Z,l s£�i•.S15S,s�F�'{a tS�}•,S tl�r ;tf3r 7£Z41 �,f11}�... .,rl nl�lSSf'{4#fs£ y,s}/7}„t's r374i �til�b{i `s l$117I11r i,f{, 7I17t .'}G£� r;F}(SS ..
Conflicting Flan AI - 38 0 - - - Conflicting HavAll - 64 0 - - -
stage 1 stage 1
Stage 2 _ _ _ Stage 2
CrIbcaf Hdwy 6.94 Crtticag H ny 6.94
Criticad Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 -
Qi1ir Hd"Stg2 chi" Stg2
Folia*up FkfW _ 3.32 _ - FdloA up Hwy - 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 1026 0 0 Pot Cap<1 0 7 0 0
Stage 1 0 0 0 _ Sty 1 0 _ 0 0
Stage2 0 0 0 Stge2 0 0 0
Platoon flocked,% Platoon blocked,% e
Mav -1 Mar - 10 - MovC�r r l Manw - 87
May Cap-2 vlaneuve _ _ _ May Cap-2 Maneuve _ _
Rage 1 Stage 1
Stage 2 Stage 2
t t s < zi {3 3 f { z , }£ s } s r, r.:, ziLrc=rr i_.. >z:'Fr r}'u _ Lrr,�._, {I!r z.\_. i it�zpiSff tt}-ry,•, rr trt,�, z<t ,},4+'..
HCMCdr*d Way:s 9.3 0 ; Q HQ C3ntrot may,s 9.2 0 0
,i { "J;1t}£Ft,is r i i 4.,F t P t'r t3ti}i}t L i » £� tsYJ Fi'�r3 ,t t T„�3 '" t. i t£ li 5r, SSs •:br =..,({ t» ,YF(# „I{21zrl,f£{3 rt[=[7 f.rf 7r�Zri,s.Z{^11:�{£�I 5„f�t`•.i4i{t;tR t§?r}1i11,,SjtUa}t} „;.)' s,fS t3 F) {4,Y:, 3 .},r{f „fCSC rr, 144,.}?t1 t,7i 41st.,#o4,�z"Z tjki,?,rtYF#°{?)3}Irt f'�tf llliU trl;7ft} £tf{r„ssitS{fF }34f}{#}..Z�.
t �,»
C h`(Veft) 1026 - Ovacity(va") - 987
HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0,193 HCM Lane VC Ratio 0,133
HCMC rolDelay(s) 9.3 FCMQ 'dD81W(a) R2
HOM Lane LC6 A HCM Lane LOS A
HCM95th°/duet( ) 0.7 CXMMhl/4!IeQ(+ t) 0,6
07114/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/14/2022 Synchro 11 Report
QVTech Inc.-CM Page 3 QVTech Inc.-CM Page 3
Existing AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps Existing PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone SilveraX TinirKjs 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone SilveraX TinirKjs
Lane Configurations tt ttt If Lane Configurations r I tt ttt r
Traft Volurne(0) 7 0 5 34 87 121 80 Traffic Val we(vph) 19 0 2 27 108 180 59
Future Volume(vph) 7 0 5 34 87 121 80 Future Volume(vph) 19 0 2 27 108 180 59
Tun)Type Perm N4 Perm prn+0 NA, NA Perrin Tun Type Penn NA Perm prat NA N4 Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Pennnifted Rieses; a 3 1 1 Pernrided Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1
Sa4ch Prime Switch Prime
Mnin-urn Initial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Minirrurn Initial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Mnin t-m--Iefit(s) 44.9 49 40 10.6 31.t'i 31,6 31.6 MnirrixnSpfit(s) 44.9 44,9 44-4 %6 31.6 31B 31.6
Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 11.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 11.0 34.0 34.0 34.0
'row split(1/0) -5D,01/. 50,01% 5001% 1221% 3T8% 37,81% 37,81/6 'raw Soft(IN 5Y)01% 50,01% 5301% 122% 3701b 3781/o 3781
YellowTnre(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 YellowTirre(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
Afl-Rqd Tiff e(s) 2.0 20 20 2.0 20 ZO 2.0 Afl-Rad Tare(s) ZO ZO 2.0 ZO 20 20 20
Lost Trre Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost TrneAdjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Loa Thie(s) 59 59 59 56 56 56 56 Tdat Lost Tire-(s) 59 59 59 56 56 56 56
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Le@dLag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lagopfirriza? yes yes yes yes Load-Lagoorntw? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None Max C4jbx C-Mw( C-Mw( Recall N/locle Nbne None None Max CmMax C-Max C-Max
Cycle Leigh:90 Cyde Length:90
Actcatecl Cycle Length,90 Ackeitecl Oyde LeVK 90
Offset:0(01%),Referenced to phase 1:NBS6,Start of Green,N/laster Intersection Offset:0(01%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Nbster Intersection
NAM O)de:90 NaW Cycle.90
Control Type:Actuated-Ccadnated Control Type:Actuated-Coorclinated
Splits and Phases: 4:Go1c1fie1dRd&US-6DMRams Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&LJS-6DMRamps
�4 -'1 1#4 #5 #4 #5 #4 95 #4 #5 #4 #5
A,07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report 07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report
QvTech Inc.-CM Page 1 QvTech Inc.-CM Page 1
Existing AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps Existing PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone SilveraX HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity A-dos
t /*
Lane Configurabors tt ttt r Lane Configurations r tt ttt r
Tr.ft Veturris(0) 0 0 0 7 0 5 34 87 0 0 121 80 ThaffloVialurna(vIch) 0 0 0 19 0 2 27 108 0 0 ISO 59
Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 7 0 5 34 87 0 0 121 80 Future Vdun-e(vph) 0 0 0 19 0 2 27 108 0 0 180 59
Ided Row(vichpl) 19M 19M 1900 190D 1900 190D 19M 19M 1900 19M 1900 190D Ideal Row( l) 19M 1900 1900 19M 1900 19M 190D 19M 190D 19M 19M 19M
Total Lost tirre(s) 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 Total Lost tirre(s) 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Lam LAIL Factor 0.95 0.91 0.95 IOD 0g6 0.91 1100 Lane LJOI.Factor 0,95 0.91 OM I.OD 0195 M 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.94 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,85 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1-00 1.00 0,85
At Protected 0.95 0,97 IOD 0,% 1.00 UO 'LOO Fit protected 0.95 r 0.95 UD 0.95 1,00 'LOO 'LOO
Satd.Row(prot) 1681 1547 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583 Satc.Row(prot) 1681 1610 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583
At Parrafted OAS ON 1.00 OM 1.00 1.00 1,00 At Permitted OM 095 1.00 0.61 1,00 1,00 1,00
Satcl, 681 1547 1504 1235 3539 5085 1583 Said.Row erm) 1681 1610 1504 1140 3539 5085 1583
Pe*-hour Wor,PHF 025 0,25 025 035 0.75 0,75 089 0.89 0,89 OiW 0,90 00 Peak-hourfador,PHF 025 0,25 Us 458 (158 0,58 0,79 0,79 0.79 0,84 0.84 0.84
Adj.Row(vph) 0 0 0 9 0 7 38 98 0 0 134 89 Adj.Row(vph) 0 0 0 33 0 3 34 137 0 0 214 70
RT0RRqducbcn(vph) 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 l 0 0 29 RTCR f?Bdu Mon(vph) 0 0 0 0 i 0 3 0 0 0 0 f 0 23
Lane Group Row 0 38 98 0 0 134 60 Lane 17 0 34 137 0 0 214 47
Turn Type Farm M Perm Wo M N& Perm Turn Type Ram NA Penn WrIat NA, I'A Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permtted Phases 3 3 1 1 PaTritted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated GreaR G(s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 66.1 60.7 607 607 Actuated Green,G(s) 6.7 6.7 6.7 66.2 60,8 60,8 60,8
STed-Grisen,O) 6.8 6,8 68 66.1 60.7 60.7 60.7 Effect-Green,Q(g) 67 V 67 66.2 60.8 60A 6H
Actuated c,YC Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.73 0.67 0.67 0.67 Actuated g(C:Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.74 0.68 0.68 0.68
Clearance,The(s) 5.9 5,9 5,9 66 56 H U Clearance Trr is(a) 5.9 59 5,9 H 5,6 5.6 &6
Vehicle Extension(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Vahide Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
L-Orp Cap(Wh) 127 116 113 939 2386 3429 1067 L-GpCap(vph) 125 119 Ill 876 239D 3435 1(W-
Ws Ratio Prot cO.00 0.03 0.03 v/s Ratio Prot cO.00 0.04 o0.04
V/S Ratio Perm cOOD qOD ODD 0.03 (D.04 V/S Ratio Perm 0,01 001 OOD 003 OM
v/C Ratio 0.05 0,00 0.00 0.04 0,04 0,04 0,06 v1c Ratio 0,13 0.14 0,00 0,04 0,06 0,06 0,04
Unform Oft dl 38,6 38.5 385 33 4,9 A9 5.0 Uht1brinri Delay,dl 38.9 39.0 38.6 5.2 4,9 4:9 4.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 0.61 1.00 1.00 Progression Factor 1,OD 100 1,00 0.56 0.65 1.00 1,00
Incrennental Way,d2 RI Go 0.0 0.1 go 0.0 0.1 Incrarnerilal Delay,d2 i 0.2 02 0.0 01 0.0 010 0.1
Way(s) 38.7 38.5 38.5 1.6 ao 4.9 5.1 Delay(s) 39.1 39.2 38.6 1.9 3.3 5.0 5.0
Levi of Service, D D D A A A A Level of Sermce D D D A A A A
AMeach Delay(s) H 38.5 26 5.0 Approach Delay(s) H 391 3.0 5.0
Approach LOS j A D A A Approach Ltd A D A A
M I
HONAMbontrot Way 56 FICM2000 Level of SM" A HCM20WQrtrd Wary 6A FOA200OLevelafServitce A
HCM 2000 Volurne to Capacity ratio 0.05 HCM 2000 Volurne to Capacity ratio 0.07
Actuated Coe Length(s) gao Surn,of lost tirre(s) 17.1 Actuated Cycle Lo-Oh(s) WD 17A
Intersection Capacity 1-kilization 42.6% ICU Level of Samoa A Intersection Capacity I.Ailization 45-71% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(rrin) 15 A-dysisPanod(rdri) 15
c Critical Lane Group, c Critical Lane Group
07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report 07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3
Existing AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps Existing PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Cuajes 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Quajes
EE MIN
Lane GroLp Raw(vph) 6 5 5 38 98 134 89 Lane Go Raw(vph) 16 17 3 34 137 214 70
Vic Ratio 004 0.02 U2 0.04 004 0,04 OA8 Vic RWO 0.10 0,11 0,01 0.(4 0,06 006 0.06
Control Delay 37,2 0,2 0,2 13 3.4 5.4 1,2 Control Delay 38,8 39,0 0,0 1,5 3,6 53 07
01"Way 0.0 OD ao 0,0 Ob ao OD coewway, OD ao OD OD 0,0 0,0 0.0
Total Delay 37.2 0.2 0.2 1.3 3.4 5.4 1.2 Total Delay 38.8 39.0 0.0 1.5 3.6 5.3 0.7
0"-e two sm(ft) 3 0 0 1 4 8 0 tea—Length Mh(ft) 9 9 0 1 6 13 0
Q—Length 95th(ft) 12 0 0 3 8 16 12 aaB LffKp 95th(ft) 18 19 0 3 10 21 5
Internal Unk Ost(ft) 63q 484 300 Internal UnklDst(ft) 639 484 300
Tian Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145 Turn Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145
Be-Cal—ly(vph) 730 729 709 955 2432 3495 1120 B—Capacity(vph) 730 699 709 890 2436 3WO 1192
Starvation Cap ReMctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Rgftjctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8011back Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillba*Cap ReUtn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Redidn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stuage Cap Redudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rq&wd We Me U1 0,01 001 ON 0.04 ON UB RqUed vie Ratio 0,02 a0Z aOD 0.04 0,06 H6 0,06
07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report 07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report
QvTech Inc.-CM Page 2 QvTech Inc.-CM Page 2
Existing AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps Existing PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray # Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Trrirgs
-� -+* 'i 1 r'` 1► � ''� -► `fit � l* �►
r r rrr� },.t,r rs,.,.,.,. r i==" t.y< >z>. - :t;,a .� »-i ">�F.•<>al r 1 7} }} f t li t# (( � �t ,.,,.Y. t £�{ ,r�� , ,.}5}S„�1fSC�{tb r;{{t ii} III (I# 3k>rr i} 1 1} {}n.;rJu 3.tkt i25,r ik l`�}171 J,,•••, }}s).t '$t4f fs3} .�{{�{. t' dr),'(t=;{z{{,ze,t lt,S##�) I 4f f({ ((f#5izi ft£
Lane Configurations a$r 1 ttt tt Lane Configurations 1 44 r ttf r tt
TrafC7cVdt (vp) 60 0 30 61 17 91 37 TratficVdur (uph) 85 0 43 44 40 147 55
Future Volume(vph) 60 0 30 61 17 91 37 Future Vdurre(vph) 85 0 43 44 40 147 55
Turn Type Pam PEA Pam NA Perm pro" M Ta T)" Perrin PEA Penn NA Farm pn+pt NA ,
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Perrntledphases`, 3 3 1 1 Petlritted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1
Snitch Phase taMch Phaw
Mnimamintial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 Mnim rnInitial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0
MN-Split 44.9 44.9i 44.9 31B al,6 10.6 31.6 Mni-Solt(s) 44.9 44.9 44.9 31.6 31.6 106 31.6
Total Spit(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0
"row split(IN 9D.01% 51M. 50 % 3T8°}0 37.Wl. 12.2%. 378% TOW Spit(1/0) %01/6 50.01% 5D,01/. 37.81% NO% 1221% 370/
YellowTirre(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 a6 YelloWTirre(S) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 a6
Al-RedTirre(s) 2R 20: 20 2.0 20 20 20 A114WTirr (s) 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 20 2.0
Lost Tirre Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Tirre Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TOW Lost Tirm(S) 59 5.9 5.9 5.6 5;6 5.6 SO Total Lost Tirre(s) 5.9 52 5.9 5.6 5B .6 5.6
Le dLag Lead Lead Lag Lead LeacULag Lead Lead Lag Lead
Leackag 01 Yes Yes Yes Yes L Lag C phnni e? YES Yes Y68. Yes t
Recall I ... N ne Pore Pore C-Max C-Max Max C-Max Recall Mxie Now Nore Pore C-Max C-Max Melt Gives...:
.f,n S r,lL f.„ i l\,.*•l`y`c�<uC "rS,Yt F ,f, f t4, }„' :".h { St tttC "t {.I 1 ;f.Z: (S Y=i., �7tp,J�ils,,t .�sttt�ts Y2t#=t.r,.�t4}t�,t, >>JiV#ssrt� i15r7?).�vrf}t �,r)�f,3tf5,r�#sLrS)i�kt)�rt�h�{(c��c �t` firs>•,�)(} L�711),j li, �ai rr�� r}i,5,¢#� �.f�z�=�•,as ii}i,x{Lt� )fr �1tStj,J�tadj a#rt�`t,�tzJ�F:
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
AdtuatedOydI matedOydeLength:90
Offset:0(01%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,I Intersection Offset:0(01%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Nlaster Intersection
Natural Cycle:9€7 Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US6D EB Rarrps Splits and Phi: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-6D EB Rarrps
44 z5 414 41 1#4 #5 »4 a5 «4 r5 :4 #5
01
07/1412M Synch 11 Repot 07/14/2022 Synch 11 Report
QvTedn Inc.-CM Page 4 QVTedn Inc.-CM Page 4
Existing AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps Existing PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Sgrialized Intersection Capacity A-dysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Sgrialized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations ttt r fit Lane Configurations +tt tt
Tmfflcvdum(vph) 6D 0 30 0 0 0 0 61 17 91 37 0 Traft Vdurna(vph) 85 0 43 0 0 0 0 44 40 147 55 0
Future Volume(vph) 60 0 30 0 0 0 0 61 17 91 37 0 Future Volume(viph) 85 0 43 0 0 0 0 44 40 147 55 0
idea Raw(v") 190D 1900 19M 19M 19M 1900 19M 19M 1900 190D 19M M Ideal Rox(v") 19M 19M 1900 1900 19M 19DD 19M 19DD IU M 19M 19M
Total Lost tirre(s) 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 Total Lost tirne(s) 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
L"UK Factor 0,95 0.91 0.95 1191 1.00 i1,00 U5 Lane LJOI.Factor 0,95 0.91 a95 0,91 IDO 1.00 0,95
Frt 1,00 0,99 0,85 1.00 0.85 1-00 1,00 Frt 1.00 0,99 0,85 1.00 0.85 1-00 1,00
Fit protected Q95 0,96 1,00 1,00 1.00 095 1.00 Rt Protedled 0,95 0,96 1,00 I.OD 1.00 0,95 10
Satd.RoN(prot) 1681 1600 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539 Satd.Row(prot) 1681 1598 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539
HtPernifted 0.95 OM IM 1.00 1.00 03D 1.00 Htpurrritlied 095 0'% UO 1,00 WD 072 r 1,00
Satd. 5085 1583 1306 3539 Satd.Row(perm) 1681 1598 15D4 5085 1583 1341 3539
Pe*-hourWor,PHF 068 0,68 0,68 0,25 0,25 025 078 038 038 ON ON 0,92 Peak-hourfaclorPHl' ON 0.87 0,87 1125 0,25 0,25 ON 0.84 OS4 0,80 0180 50
Adj.Row(vph) 88 0 44 0 0 0 0 78 22 108 44 0 Adj.Row(vph) 98 0 49 0 0 0 0 52 48 184 69 0
RTCRReducUon(vph) 0 42 37 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 a 0 RTCR Reduction(vph) 0 47 41 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0
Lane Group Row(vphi 47 3 3 0 0 0 0 78 15 108 44 0 Lane Gp-p 0 0 0 52 32 184 69 0
Turn Type P8011 t A Perm IN Perrn proo NA Turn Type Farm M Perm IN Perin pirtipt NA,
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Penritled Phases 3 3 1 1 Parrifted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 60.7 60.7 661 60.7 Actuated Green,G(s) 6.7 6.7 6.7 60,8 60,8 662 60,8
M-fi-Green,9 68 6,9 6.8 60.7 601 Tal 60,7 Effecft-Greeng(s) 61 67 6.7 60.8 60,8 662 60,8
Actuated c,YC Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.67 0.67 0.73 0.67 Actuated g(C Patio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.68 0.68 0.74 0.68
aearano-a Tim,(a) 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.6 5,6 H 5,6 Oearance Tim(s) 5.9 5.9 69 5.6 5,6 a6 U
Vehicle FAerision(s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 12
Lane Grp Cap(Wh) 127 12D 113 3429 1067 987 2386 L-GPCM(V1Jh) 125 118 111 3435 1069 1012 2390
v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 00.01 0.01 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.01 0.02
v/s Ratio Perm c0,03 ODD 0.00 0,01 c0,07 v1s Ratio Form c1,03 0,00 Q00 0.02 c012
V/c Ratio 0.37 0.03 0,03 0,02 0,01 0,11 0,02 v/c Patio 0.42 0,03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0,18 0,03
Urflatin Way,di 39A 385 38.5 4A 48 3,5 4,8 Uniform Way,dI 39,8 38S 336 48 4.8 3,6 4,8
Progression Factor 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0.42 0.67 Progression Factor 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.53 0.55
Increrriental Way,d2 01 oO OD QO 0.0 0.2 igO traerriental Delay,Q CIA 00 (10 0,0 0,1 04 0,0
Delay(s) 40.2 38.6 38.6 4.9 4.8 1.7 3.2 Way(s) 40.6 38.7 38.7 4.8 4.9 23 27
Level d Service D D D A A A A Level ofSermce 0 D D A A A A
Approach Way(s) 392 H 4.9 2.1 Approach Way(s) 394 H 4.8 24
Approach LC S D A A A Approacht-O$ 0 A A A
0,
ROM=Control W-UqNY 166 HCM206�Vevelof&Moa a HCM2000Contrd Delay IaB HCM200DI-evelolSerwroe a
HCIVI 20M Volum to Capacity ratio 0.13 HCIVI 2000 Volunie to Capacity ratio 0.20
Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90,0 Surnaflostfiffe(s) 171 AdualedCydelength(s) 90.0 amd lost urn e(s) 171
Intersection Capacity Uilization 426% ICLJ Level of Sermce A Intersection Capacity Lkilization 45.71% ICU Level of Sermoe A
Arialysis Period(trin) 15 ArefysisPedod(rrin) 15
c atical Lane Group c 0i6cal Lane Group
07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report 07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report
QvTech Inc.-CM Page 6 QvTech Inc.-CM Page 6
Existing AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps Existing PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Q ajes 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray «
} 1 7} j} S t ji .{f f{ -}jjt}Y �3f}E '{$i S} { ,., {,�i n<{,�i n<{,�},�{¢€�} j}7} II) (II tfkl}Y.{f£f( ? ii {}k�;xJu 1 ik{ i2`+;` ,k 1`Y}tft t,'••, }}s).i. '34}}{�{3? {r{{r{{ �,,F^r;�t,S{i II) ��izf£� �l,s� tt
Lane Group Flaw(vph) 47 45 40 78 22 108 44 Lane Coup Raw(vph) 52 51 44 52 48 184 69
V/b Pofic, 0.30 0.19 0.17 0.02 0.02 0.11 0,02 v/cRatio 0.34 022 0.19 Q.01 0.04 0.18 0.03
Control Delay 43.1 1.7 1.6 5.5 0.1 1.3 a8 Control Delay 44.3 3.5 1.9 55 0.1 1.8 3.0
QueLeDelay 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 C,3.>eueDeelay, 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Way 43.1 1.7 1.6 5.5 0.1 1.3 a8 Total Way 44.3 3.5 1.9 5.5 0.1 1.8 3.0
Q to*50ttt(ft) 27 0' 0 4 0 2 2 QBW Length so(ft) 29 0 0 3 0 0 2
CuaR Length 95th(ft) 45 0 0 9 0 4 4 Queue Length 95th(ft) 64 5 0 7 0 21 6
Internet Unk Dist(ft) 535; 222 484 Internet Link Dist(ff) 535 222 484
Tian Bay Length(ft) 130 130 115 Turn Bay Length(ft) 130 130 115
C ty(vph) 730 750' 709 3495 1123 1003 2432 B Caparaty(vph) 73D 750 709 35W 1122 IM 2436
Starvation Cap ReMctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Paftxtn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SlelfbackCapRaductn 0 0i 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap t n 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Ern 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 _ 0 Storage Cap Redudn 0 : 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0
Radumd ulcRake, 0.05 U6 0.06 0,02 0.02 0.11 002 Ra&ced vlcRatio 0.07 0.07 0.€S 0.01 ON 018 1103
ii E zii S F �S S F , l�. �{}ni`s( nntzJ�J1 t€
07/14/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/14/2022 Synchro 11 Report
QVTech Inc.-CM Page 5 QVTech Inc.-CM Page 5
Existing AM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access Existing PM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray ROM 6th TV\SC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray ROM 6th TV\SC
7 x7 x7,v x7 x7 x7 x7 x7 x7 x7 x7 t S t E}zYz's}a �1 , Z <ft,<f ,'<f ,'<`,`t,<f ,'<ft zti 7 k 2.t3s + f}ts3�,{tt}ts3�,{tt.d,rt � t3s t3s t3s t3s t3s t3s ,.#i i71} t+.t1t kt kt€.rfs T{`2a t{t{}; s s s {s ts+t{1,7FY1,7FY1,7FY1,7FY1,7F{1,7F{1,7F{1,7F{1,7F{l,t{.}.�„ � r,}tr�.,t } tax S .},+tt..
� rr 't� ,� i� t,�'.,t.Q)h„�',17'Lsi��k`rr rr rr rr rr rr rr� 711gjf71 71 71 71 71 71j�tir �J��xt{tt�r�r}##.. }�s{,{t„tx,c,�sttj�t�tj�t�tj�t�t�t,s��ltlst��r,r,� IJ,� IJ,� IJ,� IJ,� IJ,� IJ,� IJ,� Ill r�F,tt��t{�tt��m>•t��`�€��fi�1},jr}�1Y 1E..
Int Delay,s(veh 2.7 In[Delay,siveh 2.5
Lane Configurations ' '';'' r ) 0 Lane Configurations a'a I `fit r
ThAcVd,vdVh % 3 2 0 2 1 21 01 71 8 19 87 3 Traffic Vol,VeNh 5 0 1 4 0 28 1 64 8 28 57 9
Future Vol,veh/h 3 2 0 2 1 21 0 71 8 19 37 3 Future Vol,vel Jh 5 0 1 4 0 28 1 64 8 28 57 9
QxActirg Pete,Vhr 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0+ 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Fads,Nhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 6
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
IRTChannelmed None we - None Now RF mc4 None hone -!lone Now
Storage Length _ 50 50 50 ;wage Length 50 50 50
Ve s in Medan Storage,# - 0 0 0 0 Veh in Madan Storage,#i - 0 0 0' 0
Grade,% 0 a 0 ? 0 _ 0 Grade,o_ 0_ 0 0 _ 0 r
Peaki-eurFactor 63 63 63 75 75 75 99 91 9D 74 74 92 Peak Hour Fad r 50 50 50 80 80 8) 55 55 55 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
mot pow 5 3 0 3 1 28 0 79 9 26 50 3 WA SON' 10 0 2 5 0 35 2 116 15 32 66 10
„ t x � =E EE� .f �... .,,t c tt „•,.. ,y sJ n >f_ t„} ,,, ;., t
zY t{ S4 EZ314t tY,n;l {{c(t tt}Ftj F: tol„Zki tT r, ( .1 fzStr+F. 3f 22{Y 3 }lti YsJ �} }"' „ll}{. 1 ! l\{ { { ,tsie}71l s'}ttt rr;
Ceriicing Row At 144 192 27 158 184 40 53 0 0 88 0 0 ConfiidirgRowAl 197 270 38 217 260 58 76 0 0 131 0 0
Stage 104 104 79 79 - - Stagel 135 135 - 120 120
Sty 2 40 88 79 105 _i _ _ _ Stage 2 62 135...;. 97... 140 _
Critical!YMy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 654 694 4,14 4A4 Cr ficd Fkwuy 7,54 6,54 6.94 T54 6,54 694 4.14 4,14
Qiticd Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 6.54 5.54 - - -
Offical HdwyStg2 6.54 5,64 - 6,,54 5,54 Clifical HdvYySIg2 6.54 5.54 - 6,54 1544 -
Fdiav Lp HIJ W 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 222 2.22 - Follow-up HdMW 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 2.22 -
PotCa4r1 Mamw 811 702 1042 i 793 709 <1022 1551 15TO Pat C p4 ManeLw 770 65t7 058 745 659 9Wii 1542 1462
Stage 1 890 808 921 829 Stage 1 877 798 - 872 796
Stage2 970 W 921 807 Stage 942 784 I - 923 794
Platoon blocked,% _ A v Ratoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 1 A ^
M3vCap-1Icon 777 690 1042 :7 4 697 1022 1551 1506 Mov Ga4r1PVIarr T 3 635 105E 730 644 996 1542 1452
Mov Cap-2 Mar>euver T77 690 780 697 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 730 635 730 644 -
Stage 890 794 921 829 Stags 876 78D 871 :795
Stage 2 942 821 - 901 793 - - - - Stage 2 908 783 901 776
St ,z tt F /l }Zi Z{ 2F/{ttt tF7 tr i, t,t .,f ZS St i ,Z t rrS t6S ( F f£ lP r, ti } }Zlit r» ,,} Yit rS t r, FSS, CSm 14Fs<Y zi"lZJ 4 ,\,
HOMCortrd Delay,s 9.9 88 0 2.4 HCM0o 6d Dday,s 9,7 8.9 at 22
HCMLC6 A A _.. R MLC6_. A A _.
.,t' ,.. t{tI R}' trJ...t Y .;y. y.,e,z t,,.,' ,,s"" rx,zt, f .t.,..r.. ., k..r Rif' .. ti}'• 1}. i f }.J II P r '"zr y
caperity( ) !; 1551 Tao M 1506 cvaaty(vd*) 1542 770 953'1452
HCM Lane V1C Ratio - 0,011 0.033 0.017 ROM Lane V/C Ratio 0,001 0,016 0.042 0.022
FICIVIOontralD (s) 0 99; 8.8 T4" H IContral0day(s) 7.3 9.7 &9 T5
HCM Lane LC6 A - A A A - HCM Lane LOS A - A A A -
HCM 95th°Idile0(veh) 0 0 ' 0.1 0.1' HCM95thI/WileG(veh)_, 0 0 0.1 0.1
07114/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/14/2022 Synchro 11 Report
QVTechInc.-CM Page 4 QVTechInc.-CM Page4
Existing AM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd Existing PM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCU 6th TV\SC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCU 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s(veh U Int Delay,s/veh 2
Larle C"Agurabom Y 0 'fit I-aleCaIguralJorG Y 0 tt
Traffic Vd,veh/h 2 27 52 3 17 22 Traffic Vd,vdYh 2 17 56 5 13 49
Future Vol,vel-Vh 2 27 52 3 17 22 Future Vol,veb/h 2 17 56 5 13 49
Oarfiding Reds,Or 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 Corffiding Peds,Vhr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Ca*ol Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Ca*oI Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
Rro)wwmd - Nbre We - NDre RrChwWLwd - Norle None - Nwe
a-age Leh 0 50 - a-age L"h 0 50 -
Vets in Medan Storage,# 0 0 - 0 Veh in Mdan image,# 0 0 - 0
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0
Reek HoLr Factor 60 60 86 86 70 70 PeakHourRdor 53 53 61 61 74 74
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
K"t9ow 3 45 60 3 24 31 WmTt Flow 4 32 92 8 18 66
Connicting F1cNAI 126 32 0 0 63 0 Conflictirg RcNAI 165 50 0 0 100 0
Sty 1 62 - - - - - stage 1 96
Stage 2 64 - Stage 2 69
Critical FbW 6.84 6.91 4.14 Critical HJW 6,84 6X 4,14
Qibcd Hdwy SIg 1 5.64 - - Crftical FdW Stg 1 5.84
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84 - Critical Hd*y*2 684
Fclio*Lp HAW 3.52 3.32 229 FolloALp HJvy 3.52 3.32 2.22
Pat Cap-1 MmW M 1035 1538 PbtCap�l Mmwver 833 1008 1490
Stage 1 953 - - Stage 1 917 - -
Slage2 951 - - Stage 2 967 - -
Platoon blocked, e e Plabon blocked,% I
Wvt�l Ifteuver 842 1035 1538 WvCap*1 Maneuver 823 1008 1490
Nbv Cap-2 Maneuver 815 - - Mdv Cap-2 lvbreAer 801 - -
;stage 1 953 - Stage 1 917
Stage 2 936 Stage 2 955
FEMCIontrul Delay,s 8.7 0 32 HCM Control Delay,a &8 0 1,6
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
capacity(Vd*01) 1016 1538 Cq)adty(vd-Vh) W 1490
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0,048 0,016 HCM Lane VC Ratio 0,037 0,012
HCMax*d Delays) 87 T4 Hm Calrd Oda/(8) 8.8 7A
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM95th-%bIeQ(veh) 0.1 0 HCMg&h-/,tiIeQ(veh) 0.1 0
07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report 07/1412022 Synchro 11 Report
QvTech Inc.-CM Page 5 QvTech Inc.-CM Page 5
Existing AM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access Existing PM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6thTVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6thTVVSC
.�t�,r,.sh3f mf�sY�j#t�s{'�'ri 2�}�, ;{.zlJI{�y�, ��{�;ak}��f�y,�� r�� r�� r�� r�� r�� r�� r�� r�� ffjS�7��rr{#�}rSS?>�S S,������FFlrii{r<4 '�S�I t«�,�7 iY�i111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 igl�if,`�t}F��fr���}}�rsr''{'t»lYi?„t Y�il11111111111i1ii�I��f j='i
Int Delay,sfveh 1.7 In[Delay,slyeh 0.8
LaneCorAgurabons z ° LaneCcdguratiom '
Traffic Vol,Vd Vh 6 14 28 1 3, 1 ThAcVbI,veWh 2 27 10 0 1 3
Future Vol,ve" 6 14 28 1 3 1 Future Val,vehJh 2 27 10 0 1 3
C unll cting Poft 4#hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cor f sting Pecs,#ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sic„p'r Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RTChannaload Now Nona - None PT ized Norre -' - None '' tone
S1 Leh 0 Sty L,Vh 0
Veh in Madan Stoic# - 0 0 ; 0 ! Veh in Mean Stones,#" - 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0_. G ade,% 0 0 0 _
Pwk Hour F 83 83 60 + 60 33 92 Fkaek Hour Factor 81 81 42 42 1W 100
Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2
N"F0W 7 17 47 2 9 1 MCI ROW 2 33 ;24 0 1 3
} „rkr ec- }S v 5_E Y•t )'s 'r'....�>rf,.... � '* ) _�..r r ......Tl1 �E�tts ='mil% } i -,..._ •• k) ,. )s r Connict ng Flow Al 49 0 - 0 79 48 Conhicting HavAl 24 0 - 0 61 24
Stage 1 48; stage 1 24
Stage 2 _ + _ _ 31 Stage 2 - 37 _
Offical Hdaky 4,12 642 &22 Critical HJ" 4,12 6A2 6,22
Critical Hdvvy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Qiticd Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
CdcalHcKWStg 2 5,42 C - Citical y5'tg2 642
Follow-up Hdvy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Fallow-up Hd\W 2.218 - 3.518 3.318
Pot caps i 15% f 924 1021 Pot t 1 1591 945 1052
StageS 1 _ 974 Sty 1 - 999
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,% _ +
thnrCap-1 Maneuver 1558 919 1021 lybiCap-Mbneuver M 944 1052
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 919 Mix Cap-2 None uver - - 944
Stage 1 969 Stage 1 998
Stage 2 e _ 992 Stage 2 985 _
r..i JS {r .G... ,t!!! }r•'t rid.. J. s_u. 1r, 5=Nfr's E\InY.iT .1._,
�� r 3 T sT, �s'S riv"a, , � {i!,}t 'r`s } .., �4 s'£?lr {I F }t t r 4 7r J 3 , 4 1 {J 4 F5 {} l S , } s t 1}" } }}7. fi Y £ nY Y z}J zf, t4. 2 r) i £Y ri t i { 7 .Y{r
?}{{ ll1{ti ,bolt St{t?Ytt rFt{ ;{J l fir t�,�,}» }, }t / .t{{{;},.flrr{,r{t. it Cs tt.t c(,.f },'rrr( €ti #;ii;'c..S{€"} z,ti ?
tt l�hrtS,51 {1,(t1i.,1��,ts}{ccr�T'4�f�Li�,{,?trtrU,}��}�rri�i(s�ri1{ ,3 P;,rr �s��a 5� FS, T,{�S�i#,!< i, i .,i}s st}r
HC IVIControl Delay,s 22 0 89 l KY ODNrol Delay,a 0.5 0 8.5
FILM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity( Yh) 155B 929 Capacity(Vehfh) 1591
HCM Lane VC Ratio 0,005 0.011 HCM Lane VC Ratio 0,002 0.004
HCM Control Daiay(S T3 0 8.9 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.3 i 0 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - A HCM Lane LOS A A p
HCIVI95fh°ldileQ(veh) 0 0 HCM95th°lattieQ(v€h) 0 0 r
07114/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07l1412022 Synchro 11 Report
C1vTech Inc.-CM Page 6 C1vTech Inc.-CM Page 6
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX D
CRASH ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
C i v T e C h
CRASH STATISTICS 1-1-1—L Goldfield Rd & Old West Hwy NWB
C
2019-2020
C N O 0 0
z z,
0 ,k Code ON. Code No. Additional Useful Information
Incidents 3 5 Veh 7 0 First Harmful Event Month
Fatal 0 0 PSI 0 0 Circumstances OVERTURN ROLLOVER 1 0 January 1 0 Vehicle Action Codes
Injury 1 1 Ppl 0 0 Hit & Run? 0 FIRE_EXPLOSION 2 0 February 2 1 1 GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD
PDO 2 4 Veh Intersection Related? 0 :MMERSION 3 0 March 3 0 2 SI.,OWING_IN_TRAFFICWAY
Pods/Bikes Summary n Inluries JACKKNIFE 4 0 April 4 0 3 STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY
o CARGO-EQUIPMENT-LOSS SHIFT 5 0 May 5 0 4 MAKING LEFT TURN
O - _ -
_ ny ro p ro Code No. FELL_JUMPED_FROM VEHICLE 6 0 June 6 0 5 MAKING RIGHT TURN
w w 2 w JunctionRalatlon THROWN_OR_FALLID7G_OBJECT 7 0 July 7 0 6 MAKING U TURN
Pedestrian: 0 0 0 0 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED 0 0 OTHER NON COLLISION 8 0 August 8 0 7 OVERTAKING_PASSING
Bicyclo: 0 0 0 0 -NTERSECTION_NON_INTERCHANGE 1 0 FQUIPMENT FAII,URF 9 0 September 9 1 8 CHANGING LANES
INTERSECTION_RELATED NON_INTERCHANGE 2 0 SEPARATION_OF_UNITS 10 0 October 10 1 9 NEGOTIATING A CURVE
Code No. FNTRANCE_FXIT_RAMP_NON_INTERCHANGF, 3 2 RAN OFF ROAD RIGHT 11 0 November 11 0 10 BACKING
LiahtCondition RAILWAY_GRADE_CROSSIDIG 4 0 RAN_OFF_ROAD_LEFT 12 0 December 12 0 t.l. Avdding_V2hid0 2Ct Pedestnan
DAYLIGHT 1 2 CROSSOVER_RELATED 5 0 CROSS_MEDIAN 13 0 Total 3 12 ENTERING_PARKING POSITION
DAWN 2 1 FRONTAGE ROAD NON INTERCHANGE 6 1 CROSS_CENTERLID7E 14 0 13 LEAVING_PARKING_POSITION
DUSK 3 0 DRIVEWAY 7 0 DOWNHILL_RUNAWAY 15 0 (Unit) S—f--Condition 14 PROPERLY_PARKED
DARK_LIGHTED 4 0 ALLEY_ACCESS_RELATED 8 0 MOTOR_VEHICLE_IN_TRANSPORT 16 2 DRY 1 44 15 IMPROPERLY_PARKED
DARK_NOT_LIGHTED 5 0 UNKNOWN_NON INTERCHANGE 9 0 PEDESTRIAN 17 0 WET 2 1 16 DRIVERLESS_MOVING_VEHICLE
DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 6 0 THRU_ROADWAY 10 0 PEDALCYCLE 18 0 SNOW 3 0 17 CROSSING ROAD
UNKNOWN 99 0 INTERSECTION_INTERCHANGE 11 0 RAILWAY VEIIICLE TRAIN ENGINE 19 0 SLUSH 4 0 18 WALKING_WITH_TRAFFIC
Check Total 3 INTERSECTION_RELATED INTERCHANGE 12 0 LIGHT_RAILWAY_RAILCAR_VEHICLE 20 0 ICEFTAST 5 0 19 WALKING_AGAINST_TRAFFIC
ENTRANCE_EXIT RAMP INTERCHANGE 13 0 ANIMAL_WILD_NON_GAME 21 0 WATER_STANDING_MOVING 6 0 20 STANDING
Weather FRONTAGE ROAD INTERCHANGE 14 0 ANIKAL_WILD_GAME 22 0 SAND 7 0 21 LYING
CLEAR 1 1 OTHER_PART_OF_INTERCHANGE 15 0 ANIMAL_PET 23 0 MUD_DIRT_GRAVEL 8 0 22 GETTING ON OR OFF VEHICLE
CLOUDY 2 2 <Lot defined, 16 0 ANIKAL_LIVESTOCK 24 0 OIL 9 0 23 WORKING_ON_0.2_PUSHING_VEHICLE
SLEET_NAIL_FREEZING_RAIN_OR DRIZZLE 3 0 UNKNOWN_INTERCHANGE 17 0 PARKED_MOTOR_VEHICLE 25 0 OTHER 97 0 24 WORKING_ON_ROAD
RAIN 4 0 UNKNOWN_JUNCTION 18 0 WORK_ZONE-MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT 26 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 97 OTHER
SNOW 5 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 STRUCK_6Y_FALLING SHIFTINO_CARLO_OR_OBJECT 27 0 Total 5 99 UNKNOWN
SEVERE CROSSWINDS 6 0 OTHER_NON_INTERCHANGE 109 0 OTHER NON_FIXED_OBJECT 28 0
BLOWING_SAND_SOIL_DIRT 7 0 Check Total 3 IMPACT_ATTENUATOR-CRASH_CUSHION 29 0 Body Styles
FOG SMOG_SMOKE 8 0 BRIDGE_OVERHEAD STRUCTURE 30 0 -1 NOT_REPORTED
BI.RWING SNOW 9 0 C.1 'sipnMaL-C, BRIDGF RAIL 31 0 1 \Pa4s(xx,7er VeMdes,including RVs
OTHER 97 0 SINGLE_VEHICLE 1 1 CULVERT 32 0 53 /
UNKNOWN 99 0 ANGLE (front to side)(other than left turn) 2 2 CURB 33 1 54 \TRUCKS
Check Total 3 LEFT_TURN 3 0 DITCH 34 0 88 /
REAR END 4 0 FMBANKMF,N7 35 0 89 \MOBIL&HOMF (NOT RVS)
Traf_cWayTvne„ HEAD_ON 5 0 GUARDRAIL, FACE 36 0 92 /
ONF_WAY_TRAFFICWAY 1 2 STDESWTPE_SAME_DIRF,CTION 6 0 GUARDRAILFND 37 0 93 \TRAILF,RS
TWO WAY NOT DIVIDED 2 0 SIDESWIPF,_OPPOSSTF,_DIRECTION 7 0 CONCRETE_TRAFFIC_BARRIER 38 0 120/
-;D T CONE O T_T RN AN 3 0 REAR TO SIDE 8 0 CABLE_TRAFFIC_BARRIER 39 0 121 \MOTORCYCLES
'N ROT CT D3 ANT D 4 T M DIAE 4 1 REAR TO RFAR 9 0 OTHER TRAFFIC BARRIFR 40 0 12B/
D O T M D AN.BARR IR 5 0 OTHER 97 0 TREE BUSH STUMP STANDING 41 0 254 UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN 99 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT 42 0 255 NOT REPORTED
Cheek Total. 3 Check Total 3 TRAFFIC_SIGNAL.,_SUPPORT 43 0
UTILIrY POLE,LIGHT SUPPORT 44 0
Weekday, T=a.velD11oltion, I NORTH N OTHER_POST_POIE_OR_SUPPORT 45 0
.Sunday 1. 0 2 SOUTH S FFNCF 46 0
Monday 2 0 3 FAST E MAILBOX 47 0
Tuesday 3 1. 4 WEST W BUI1'..,D:NG 48 0
Wednesday 4 0 5 NORTHWEST NW OTHER_FIXED_OBJFCT 49 0
Thursday 5 0 6 NORTHEAST NR UNKNOWN 99 0
Friday 6 0 7 SOUTHWEST SW Not Reported 255 0
Saturday 7 2 8 SOUTHEAST SE Check Total 3
Check Total 3 99 UNKNOWN 99
CRASH LISTING Goldfield Rd & Old West Hwy NWB
<---------------------- LOCATION -----------------------> <-DATE & TIME-X------------------- UNITS --------------------> <---------- PERSON -----------><------- SEVERITY -------><----- GENERAL ---->
OFF- D DIS- INTERSECT ODOR D TO- SRFCND ALGMT GRADE DFCTS BSTYLE TRIP, UACT TTL TTL TYP INJR VLTN PHSCND NON INCIDENTS INJURIESATALITIES H LT WE JCT CAR HE M
INCIDNT ON STREET MP SET R TANCE STREET NCIC NCIC YYMMDD HH:MM W TAL Ul U2 1 2 1 2 U1 U2 U1 U2 1 2 U1 U2 MOT NON 1 2 1 2 D1 D2 D1 D2 LOC PDOINJFATTT]:.,MOTNON-TLMO'PNON R CN CN REL CWY CD C
3489075 1.1 OLD WEST P 0 Goldfield (0) Rd 1113 1113 190223 08:09 '7 1 2 2 1 99 44 W I 1 0 1 3 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 N 2 1 203 1 33 1
3566569 11. OLD WFST P 0 Goldfield (0) Rd 11.13 1113 190923 15:06 3 2 1 1 _ 2 1 0 0 0 44 32 S NW 97 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 20 1 0 0 255 1 0 0 N 1 2 206 4 16 2
3705064 11 OLD WEST P 0 Goldfield (0) Rd 1113 1113 201024 14:39 7 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 30 47 S W 1 1. 4 0 1 4 1 1 20 0 0 0 255 1 0 0 N 1 2 203 1 16 2
4 1 .. .. 0 :. 0 0 255
Appendix D
_rinsed: 7/18/2022 Goldfield Rd & Old West Hwy NWB Page 1
Goldfield Rd & Old West Hwy NWB
SUMMARY BY YEAR
SEVERITY/INCIDENTS 2019 2020 Totals Checks
_LFJ�rj j dj JI
F-iDO =An= 1 1 11
TOTA:: :!
1 IF 3
,--Ed
1r Ted
B Ela Ted
SEVERITY1 INVOLVIKENT
L-["-Lll�_t E 11-I
N 1 1
�DO TJL !
4
11 di Llf ]Llm i ii-1 ri--d
Fill or d&_-I I-jua ALL-7 HEJ
B=Tr--=N =Er Ed
COLLISION MANNER
AN F1
L_11_j' T:_T1,_1RN 3
R=ARF-iF-i,ND 4
AD 1,ON
-- i-
F1-D1--=1 =FAM7__-D_RECTON
RiiAR_-TOi=D:-_ 8
R__AR TO:,_R:_AR
OT R
NO:-,: N
TOTAm 11 1 3
Appendix D
Printed: 7/18/2022 Summary by Year Page 2
CRASH STATISTICS 1-11AI-L Goldfield Rd & 01dWest Hwy Exit
C
2018-2019
C N O 0 0
s z,
0 ,k Code No. Code No. Additional Useful Information
Incidents 6 7 Veh 8 0 First Harmful Event Month
Fatal 0 0 Pal 0 0 Circumstances OVERTURN_ROLLOVER 1 0 January 1 1 Vehicle Action Codes
Injury 2 2 Pal 0 0 Hit & Run? 2 FIRE_EXPLOSION 2 0 February 2 0 1 GOING_STRAIGHT_AHEAD
PDO 4 5 Veh Intersection Related? 1 :MMERSION 3 0 March 3 0 2 SI.,OWING_IN_TRAFFICWAY
Pods/Bikes Summary w In uries JACKKNIFE 4 0 April 4 0 3 STOPPED_IN_TRAFFICWAY
o CARGO-EQUIPMENT-LOSS- _ -
SHIFT 5 0 May 5 1 4 MAKING LEFT TURN
O
_ ny ro p ro Code No. FELL_JUMPED_FROM VEHICLE 6 0 June 6 0 5 MAKING RIGHT TURN
w w 2 w JunctionRalaticn THROWD7_OR_FALLID7G_OBJECT 7 0 July 7 0 6 MAKING U TURN
Pedestrian: 0 0 0 0 NOT_JUNCTION_RELATED 0 3 OTHER NON COLLISION 8 0 August 8 1 7 OVERTAKING_PASSING
Bicyclo: 0 0 0 0 INTERSECTION NODI INTERCHANGE 1 1 FQUIPMFNT FAII,URF 9 0 September 9 1 8 CHANGING LANES
INTERSECTION_RELATED NON_INTERCHANGE 2 0 SEPARATION_OF_UNITS 10 0 October 10 0 9 NEGOTIATING_A_CURVE
Code No. FNTRANCE_FXIT_RAMP_NON_INTERCHANGF, 3 1 RAN OFF ROAD RIGHT 11 0 November 11 0 10 BACKING
LiahtCondition RAILWAY_GRADE_CROSSIDIG 4 0 RAN_OFF_ROAD_LEFT 12 0 December 12 2 t.l. Avdding_Vehid0 2Ct Pedestnan
DAYLIGHT 1 3 CROSSOVER_RELATED 5 1 CROSS_MEDIAN 13 0 Total 6 12 ENTERING_PARKING POSITION
DAWN 2 2 FRONTAGE_ROAD_NON_INTERCHANGE 6 0 CROSS_CENTERLID7E 14 0 13 LEAVING_PARKING_POSITION
DUSK 3 0 DRIVEWAY 7 0 DOWNHILL_RUNAWAY 15 0 (Unit) SurfaceCondition 14 PROPERLY_PARKED
DARK_LIGHTED 4 1 ALLEY_ACCESS_RELATED 8 0 MOTOR_VEHICLE IN TRANSPORT 16 1 DRY 1 7 15 IMPROPERLY_PARKED
DARK_NOT_LIGETED 5 0 UNKNOWN_NON INTERCHANGE 9 0 PEDESTRIAN 17 0 WET 2 0 16 DRIVERLESS_MOVING_VEHICLE
DARK_UNKNOWN_LIGHTING 6 0 THRU_ROADWAY 10 0 PEDALCYCLE 18 0 SNOW 3 0 17 CROSSING ROAD
UNKNOWN 99 0 INTERSECTION_INTERCHANGE 11 0 RAILWAY VEHICLE TRAIN ENGINE 19 0 SLUSH 4 0 18 WALKING_WITH_TRAFFIC
Check Total 6 INTERSECTION_RELATED INTERCHANGE 12 0 LIGHT_RAILWAY_RAILCAR_VEHICLE 20 0 ICE_TAST 5 0 19 WALKING_AGAINST_TRAFFIC
ENTRANCE_EXIT RAMP INTERCHANGE 13 0 ANIMAL_WILD_NON_GAME 21 0 WATER_STANDING_MOVING 6 0 20 STANDING
Weather FRONTAGE_ROAD_IDITERCHANGE 14 0 ANIKAL_WILD_GAME 22 0 SAND 7 0 21 LYING
CLEAR 1 5 OTHER_PART_OF_INTERCHANGE 15 0 ANIMAL_PET 23 0 MUD_DIRT_GRAVEL 8 0 22 GETTING_ON_OR_OFF VEHICLE
CLOUDY 2 1 <Lot defined, 16 0 ANIKAL_LIVESTOCK 24 0 OIL 9 0 23 WORKING_ON_0.2_PUSHING_VEHICLE
SLEET_NAIL_FREEZING_RAIN_OR DRIZZLE 3 0 UNKNOWN_INTERCHANGE 17 0 PARKED_MOTOR_VEHICLE 25 0 OTHER 97 0 24 WORKING_ON_ROAD
RAIN 4 0 UNKNOWN_JUNCTION 18 0 WORK_ZONE-MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT 26 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 97 OTHER
SNOW 5 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 STRUCK_6Y_FALLING SHIFTINO_CARLO_OR_OBJECT 27 0 Total 7 99 UNKNOWN
SEVERE CROSSWINDS 6 0 OTHER_NON_INTERCHANGE 109 0 OTHER NON_FIXED_OBJECT 28 0
HLOWING_SAND_SOIL_DIRT 7 0 Check Total 6 IMPACT_ATTENUATOR-CRASH_CUSHION 29 0 Body Styles
FOG SMOG_SMOKE 8 n BRIDGE_OVERHEAD STRUCTURE 30 0 -1 NOT_REPORTED
BI.RWING SNOW 9 0 Co,1, 'sipnMaL-C, BRIDGE RAIL 31 0 1 \Pa4s(xx,7er VeMdes,including RVs
OTHER 97 0 SINGLE_VEHICLE 1 5 CULVERT 32 0 53 /
UNKNOWN 99 0 ANGLE (front to side)(other than left turn) 2 0 CURB 33 4 54 \TRUCKS
Check Total 6 LEFT_TURN 3 0 DITCH 34 0 88 /
REAR END 4 0 FMBANKMF,N7 35 0 89 \MOBILFHOMF (NOT RVS)
Traf_cWayTvne„ HEAD_ON 5 0 GUARDRAIL, FACE 36 0 92 /
ONF_WAY_TRASFICWAY 1 3 STDESWIPE_SAME_DIRECTION 6 .. GUARDRAILFND 37 0 93 \TRAILF,RS
TWO WAY NOT DIVIDED 2 0 SIDFSWIPF_OPPOSSTE_DIRECTION 7 0 CONCRETE_TRAFFIC_BARRIER 38 0 120/
D T CONE O T_T RN AN 3 0 REAR_TO_SIDE 8 0 CABI.,E_TRAFFIC_BARRIER 39 0 121 \MOTORCYCLES
:N ROT CT D:::.ANT D 4 T M D:AE 4 1 REAR_TO_RFAR 9 0 OT'HF',R TRAFFIC BARRIER 40 0 128 /
D O T M D AN.BARR IR 5 .. OTHER 97 0 TREE BUSH STUMP STANDING 41 0 254 UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN 99 1 UNKNOWN 99 0 TRAFFIC_SIGN_SUPPORT 42 1 255 NOT REPORTED
Cheek Total. 6 Check Total 6 TRAFFIC_SIGNAL.,_SUPPORT 43 0
UTILIrY POLE,LIGHT SUPPORT 44 0
Weekday, Trd e_D,,c ti.h I NORTH N OTHER_POST_POIE_OR_SUPPORT 45 0
.Sunday 1. 2 2 SOUTH S FENCF 46 0
Monday 2 .. 3 FAST E MAILBOX 47 0
Tuesday 3 0 4 WEST W BU.Ci'..,DlNG 48 0
Wednesday 4 0 5 NORTHWEST NW OTHER_FIXED_OBJFCT 39 0
Thursday 5 1 6 NORTHEAST NF UNKNOWN 99 0
Friday 6 0 7 SOUTHWEST SW Not Reported 255 0
Saturday 7 2 8 SOUTHEAST SE Check Total 6
Check Total 6 99 UNKNOWN 99
CRASH LISTING Goldfield Rd & 01dWest Hwy Exit
<---------------------- LOCATION -----------------------> <-DATE & TIME-X------------------- UNITS --------------------> <---------- PERSON -----------><------- SEVERITY -------><----- GENERAL ---->
OFF- D DIS- INTERSECT OFCR D TO- SRFCND ALGMT GRADE DFCTS BSTYLE TRIP, UACT TTL TTL TYP INJR VLTN PHSCND NON INCIDENTS INJURIESATALITIES H LT WE JCT CAR HE M
INCIDNT ON STREET MP SET R TANCE STREET NCIC NCIC YYMMDD HH:MM W TAL Ul U2 1 2 1 2 U1 U2 U1 U2 1 2 U1 U2 MOT NON 1 2 1 2 D1 D2 D1 D2 LOC PDOINJFATTT]:.,MOTNON-TLMO'PNON R CN CN REL CWY CD C
3335071 1.1 GOI.,DcUE1..,D P 0 0?d West Hwy Non-Car,1113 1113 180128 0 1:4 9 1 1 1 3 1 99 50 N 1 1 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 O N 4 1 0 1 33 1
34076:-8 11. OLD WREST P 0 Goldfield Rd 1113 1113 1808a.9 05:54 1 1 1 1 1 99 44 W 1 1 0 1 3 3 0 1 _. 0 0 0 0 0 Y 2 1 5 1. 33 1.
3462439 11 OLD WEST P 0 Goldfield Rd 1113 1113 181222 08:12 '7 1 1 3 1 0 50 S 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 N 2 1 1 5 42 1
3474659 11. OLD WFST P 0 Goldfield Rd 11.13 11.13 181229 16:33 7 1. 1 1 1. 0 44 BE 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 N 1. 1 0 1 33 1
3528119 11. GOLDFIELD P 0 Old West Hwy 1113 1113 190520 06:37 2 1 1, 3 1 0 44 S 1 2 0 1 4 1 1 ## 0 0 0 255 1 0 0 N 1 2 3 99 33 1
3558273 11. GOLDFIELD M 200 Old West Hwy 1.1.13 11.13 1.90905 15:01 5 2 1 _. 2 2 3 0 0 0 31. 50 NW NW 1 1 2 0 1 1. 99 99 12 i. 0 0 255 1. 0 0 Y 1 1. 0 4 1.6 6
Appendix D
_rinsed: 7/18/2022 Goldfield Rd & 01dWest Hwy Exit Page 1
Goldfield Rd & OldWest Hwy Exit
SUMMARY BY YEAR
SEVERITY/INCIDENTS 2018 2019 Totals Checks
N:,-":
_LFJ❑rj j Idl JI
F-iDO =An= F1 4
TOTA:: :!
4 IF il
ITALA-Irl"
i:d 1r Ted
B:0LJ Cl_! Ll:J&,'_,"_l
B El-I= Fd
SEVERITY1 INVOLVIKENT
N mlr=, r_1 F-1
1DO I 3
11 di Ltr[ ]L7_m'i!mri__d
Fill or d&_-I I-jua ALL-7 HEJ
B=Tr--=N =Er Ed
COLLISION MANNER
1 4 1 ❑
AN
L_11_j' T:_T1,_lRN 3
R=ARF-iF-i,ND 4
A� Dl,ON
, -- i-
Fl-Dl--=l =FAM7__-D-RECTON 1 1
RiiAR_-TOi=D:-_ 8
R__AR TO:,_RAR
OT R
NO:-,: N
TOTAm 4
Appendix D
Printed: 7/18/2022 Summary by Year Page 2
CRASH STATISTICS Involvement Goldfield Rd & US60 WB Off-ramp
c
2018-2020
c o,
G m o 0 0
tiM A,
N r° Code No. Code No. Additional Useful Information
1'ncidelts 4 8 ven 11 0 L_i. Ha r=r�£ulEvent Month
Fatal 0 0 Ppi 0 0 circumstances OVERTURN ROLLOVER 1 0 January 1 3 Vehicle Action Codes
T nj ury 1 1 PP'
0 0 Hit & Run? 0 cIRE_FXPZOSION 2 0 February 2 1 1 GOING STRAIGHT AHEAD
PDO 3 6 Van Intersection Related? 1 IMMERSION 3 0 March 3 0 2 SLOWING_IN_'PRAFFICWAY
P.ds/S.ikes,_Summa_Gy m InjJC,ie S, JACKKNIFE 4 0 April 4 0 3 S7:'OPPFD_IN_'TRAFI'ICWAY
K o CARGO-EQUIPMENT-LOSS- -
SHIFT 5 0 May 5 0 4 MAKING LEFT TURN
a
�o N ° ° Code No. rF 11.., JUMPFID_r ROM VETHICLE 6 0 June 6 0 5 MAKING_RTGH'T_'CURN
G w 2 w Junctiortelation THROWN_OR FALLING OBJECT 7 0 July 7 0 6 MAKING_U_TURN
Pedestrian: 0 0 0 0 NOT JUNCTION RELATED 0 1 O-CHER_NON COLLISION 8 0 Amgnst 8 0 7 OVERT'AKING_PASSING
Bicycle: 0 0 0 0 INTERSECTION_NON_INTERCHANGE 1 0 EQUIPMENT_FAILURE 9 0 September, 9 0 8 CHANGING LANES
INTFRSEC PION_Rl,'LATED NON IN'CERCHANGE 2 1 SFPARATTON OF UNITS 10 0 October 10 0 9 NFGOTIATING A CURVE
Code No. ENT'RANCE_FXIT RAMP NON_TNTI,:�RCHANGE 3 1 RAN OIF ROAD_RSGH7:` 11 0 November 11 0 10 HACKING
Lj„gnl tCondJi tj,,,pn RAILW7AY_GRADF_CROSSING 4 0 RAN OFF ROAD LEFT 12 0 December 12 0 11 Adding_Vehide Ci7;ed Pcedestran
DAYLIGHT 1 4 CROSSOVER RELATED 5 0 CROSS MEDIAN 13 0 Total 4 12 ENTERING PARKING POSITION
DAWN 2 0 E'RON'TAGE_ROAD_NON_IN`PERCHANGE 6 1 CROSS_CFN`PEftLINF 14 0 13 1,FAVING_PARKING_POSTTI0N
DUSK 3 0 DRIVEWAY 7 0 DOWNHILL_RUNAWAY 15 0 (Unit) ourfaceCondition 14 PROPERLY PARKED
DARK IUGHT:TD 4 0 A7LFY_ACCFSS_RY`LATFD 8 0 MO'FOR__VEHICl,F_IN_'PRANSPORT 16 4 DRY T. 8 15 IMPROPERLY_PARKED
DARK_NOT LIGHTED 5 0 UNKNOWN_NON_INTERCHANGE 9 0 PEDESTRIAN 17 0 WET 2 0 16 DRIVERLESS_MOVING_VEHICLE
DA.RH_UNKNOWN_I.,IGH'CING 6 0 THRU ROADWAY 10 0 PEDALCYCLE 18 0 SNOW 3 0 17 CROSSING_ROAD
UNKNOWN 99 0 INTERSECTION_INTERCHANGE 11 0 RAILWAY VEHICLE TRAIN ENGINE 19 0 SLUSH 4 0 18 WALKING_WITH_TRAFFIC
Check 'Total. 4 INTFRSEC'CION_RFLA'PED_INCF�RCHANGF 12 0 LIGHT RAILWAY RAILCAR VEHICLE 20 0 ICE FROST 5 0 19 WALKING_AGAINST_1'RAI;'FIC
ENTRANCE_EXIT RAMP INTERCHANGE 13 0 ANIMAL_WILD_NON_GAME 21 0 WATER_STANDING_MOVING 6 0 20 STANDING
Weather PRONTAGE_ROAD_TN'TERCHANGE 14 0 ANIMAL WILD GAME 22 0 SAND "7 0 21 I.GING
CLEAR 1 4 OTHER_PART_OF_INTERCHANGE 15 0 ANIMAL PET 23 0 MUD_DIRT_GRAVEL 8 0 22 GETTING_ON_OR_OFF_VEHICLE
CLOUDY 2 0 not defined> 16 0 ANIMAL LIVESTOCK 24 0 OIL 9 0 23 WORK.TNG_ON_OR_PUSHING_VEHICLE
SLEET HAIL FREEZING RAIN OR DRIZZLE 3 0 UNKNOWN_INTERCHANGE 17 0 PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 25 0 OTHER 97 0 24 WORKING_ON_ROAD
RAIN 4 0 UNKNOWN_J'UNCTION 18 0 WORK ZONE MAINTENANCE_EQUIPNIE.NT 26 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 97 OTHER
SNOW 5 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 STRUCK_BY FALLING SHIETINC.CARGO OR OBJECT 27 0 Total 8 99 UNKNOWN
SFVERE CROSSWINIDS 6 0 OTHER_NON_INIFRCHANGF 109 0 OTHER NON FIXED OBJ'EC7:` 28 0
BLOWING_SAND_SOIL_DIRT 7 0 Check Total 4 IMPACT A'ITENU IOIt CRASH CUSHION 29 0 Body Stvles
BOG SMOG_SMOKE 8 0 BRIDGE OVERHEAD STRUCTURE 30 0 -1 NO'C_RFPOR'TED
BLOWING_SNOW 9 0 Coll,isionManner BRIDGE RAIL 31 0 1 \Passenger Vehides,indudirg Ws
OTHER 97 0 SINGIF_VEHTCLE 1 0 CULVERT 32 0 53 /
UNKNOWN 99 0 ANGLE (front to side)(other than left turn) 2 0 CURB 33 0 54 \'T'RUCKS
Check Total 4 LEFT TURN 3 1 DITCH 34 0 88 /
REAR END 4 0 EMBANKMENT:' 35 0 89 \MOBILEHOME (NOT GAS)
TrafficWaVTVPP F_EAD ON 5 0 GUARDRAIL_FACE 36 0 92 /
ONE_WAY_TRAFFICWAY 1 C SIDESWIPE SAME DIRECTION 6 3 GUARDRAIL_END 37 0 93 \TRAILERS
TWO WAY NO'T_DIVIDED 2 2 SIDESWIPE_OPPOSITF_DIRECTTON `/ 0 CONCRFTF_'TRAi•FIC_BARRIE',R 38 0 120 /
D:.D T CONT.N O T::T RN AN: 3 2 REAR TO_SIDE 8 0 CABLE_TRAFFIC_BARRIER 39 0 121 \MOTORCYCLES
'I N ROT CT D: ANT D 4 t T M UAE 4 0 REAR TO REAR 9 0 OTHER_TRAFFIC BARRIER 40 0 128 /
D':D 0 T M D AN.BARR '_.R 5 0 OTHER 97 0 TREE BUSH STUMP STANDING 41 0 254 UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN 99 0 UNKNOWN 99 0 TRAFFIC SIGN SUPPORT 42 0 255 NOT REPORTED
Chock Total 4 Check Total 4 TRAFFIC_SIGNAL_SUPPORT 43 0
UTILITY POLE LIGHT SUPPORT 44 0
W¢ kdav TravelDirection 1 NORTH N OTHER POST POLE�OR SUPPORT 45 0
Sunday 1 2 2 SOUTH S FENCE 46 0
Monday 2 0 3 EAST E MAILBOX 47 0
'Tuesday 3 0 4 WEST W BUILDING 48 0
Wednesday 4 0 5 NORTHWEST NW OTHER_FIXED_OBJECT 49 0
Thursday 5 2 6 NORTHEAST NE UNKNOWN 99 0
Friday 6 0 7 SOUTHWFS'T SW Not Reported 255 0
Saturday 7 0 8 SOUTHEAST SE Chock Total 4
Check Total.. 4 99 UNKNOWN 99
CRASH LISTING Goldfield Rd & US60 WB Off-ra=
<---------------------- LOCATION -----------------------> <-DATE & TIME-X------------------- UNITS --------------------> <---------- PERSON -----------><------- SEVERITY -------><----- GENERAL ---->
OFF- D DTS- INTERSECT OFCR D TO- SRFCND ALGMT GRADE DFCTS BSTYLE TRDR FACT TTL TTL TYP SNJR GLYN PHSCND NON INCIDENTS INJURIESFATALITIES H LT WE JCT TAR HE M
INCIUNT ON STREET MP SET R TANCE STREET NCIC NCIC YYMMDD HH:MM W TAL Ul U2 1 2 1 2 Ul U2 Ul U2 1 2 Ul U2 MOT NON 1 2 1 2 Dl D2 Di D2 LOC PDOINJPAT"TTLMOTNON`TTLMO`TNON R AN AN REL CWY CD C
3327884 11 GOLDFIELD P 500 US-60 Exit 198 J-Ramr 1113 1113 180128 13:03 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 44 30 S S 8 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 12 1 0 0 255 1 0 0 N 1 1 0 2 16 6
4 1 0 0
3580689 11 GOLDFIELD P 500 US-60 Exit 198 J-Ramp 1113 1113 180128 13:03 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 99 99 44 15 E N 4 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 99 99 0 C 255 1 C 0 N 1 1 6 2 16 6
3631089 11 GOLDFIELD P 100 US-60 Exit 198 C-Ramp1113 1113 200123 12:52 5 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 50 44 S S 8 2 3 0 1 4 1 1 12 0 0 0 255 1 0 0 N 1 1 206 3 16 6
1 1 1 0 2
3637779 11 GOLDE"IELD P 0 US-60 Exit 198 J'-Ramp1.11.3 1.11.3 200227 14:41 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 44 15 NW S 4 1 2 0 1 1 3 1 20 1 0 0 255 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 N 1 1 3 3 16 3
Appendix A
Printed: '7/18/2022 Goldfield Rd & US60 ED Off-ramp Page 1
Goldfield Rd & US60 WB Off-ramp
SUMMARY BY YEAR
SEVERITY/INCIDENTS 2018 2019 2020 Totals Checks
N:,-": 7[]I_] _LFJ❑rj j dj JI
F-iDO =An= F1 1 3
TOTA::
IF 4
,--Ed
Tr Ted
B Ela= ❑ Fd
SEVERITY1 INVOLVIKENT
L-L"-Lll�_t E 11-I
N 1 1
JDO T,J DU 4 U Lj'JO i
L]Ld L Jir Llul!'"iIi-Irl--d
F11 OT_d
&
B=T=N =Er Ed
COLLISION MANNER
_1!N I j, U:
" 1:
AN
L-11 ',_,T:_T1,_1RN 3 1 1
R=ARFiF-i,ND 4
D1,� ON
, --A i-
F1-D1--=1 =FAM7__-D_RECTON F1 1 3
Rii ARC Oi=D:-_ 8
R__AR TO:,_RAR
OT R
NO:-,: N
TOTAm 11 11 4
Appendix D
Printed: 7/18/2022 Summary by Year Page 2
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX E
TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
,C4'0'--E—E, C i v T e c h
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Trip Generation
Proposed June 2022
Methodology Overview
This form facilitates trip generation estimation using data within the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trip Generation Manual,11th Edition and methodology described within ITE's Trip
Generation Handbook,3rd Edition.These references will be referred to as Manual and Handbook,respectively.The Manual contains data collected by various transportation professionals for a
wide range of different land uses,with each land use category represented by a land use code(LUC).Average rates and equations have been established that correlate the relationship between
an independent variable that describes the development size and generated trips for each categorized LUC in various settings and time periods.The Handbook indicates an established
methodology for how to use data contained within the Manual when to use the fitted curve instead of the average rate and when to adjustments to the volume of trips are appropriate and how to do
so.The methodology steps are represented visually in boxes in Figure 3.1.This worksheet applies calculations for each box if applicable.
Box f-Define Study Site Land Use Type&Site Characteristics, i Box 2-Define Site Context I Box 3-Define Analysis Objectives Trip Types&Time Period
The analyst is to pick an appropriate LUC(s)based on the subject's zoning/land use(s)/future land use(s).The size of the land use(s)is described in reference to an independent variable(s)specific
to(each)the land use(example:1,000 square feet of building area is relatively common).Context assessment is to"simply determine whether the study sites is in a multimodal setting"and"could
have persons accessing the site by walking,bicycling,or riding transit."This assessment is used in Box 4.The Manual separates data into 4 setting categories-Rural,General Urban/Suburban,
Dense Multi-Urban Use and Center City Core.This worksheet uses the following abbreviations,respectively:R,G,D,and C.The Manual does not have data for all settings of all land use codes.
The"General Urban/Suburban"setting is used by default.
This tool will focus on vehicular trips for a 24-hour period on a typical weekday as well as its AM peak hour and PM peak hour.Other time period(s)may be of interest.
Land Use T es and Size
LR-Apartments No Rail 275 Dwelling Units 220 Multifamily Housing(Low-Rise Not Close to Rail)
Box 4-Is Study Site Multimodal?
Per the Handbook,"if the objective is to establish a local trip generation rate for a particular land use or study site,the simplified approach(Box 9)may be acceptable but the Box 5 through 8
approach is required if the study site is located in an infill setting,contains a mix of uses on-site,or is near significant transit service."
Box 5/13ox 9 Estimate Baseline Trips/Estimate Vehicular Trips(Determine Equation)
Vehicle trips are estimated using rates/equations applicable to each LUC.When the appropriate graph has a fitted curve,the Handbook has a process(Figure 4.2)to determine when to use it
versus using the weighted average rate or collecting local data.The methodology requires for engineering judgement in some circumstances and permits engineering judgement to override or
make adjustments when appropriate to best project(example 1:study site is expected to operate differently than data in the applicable land use code-such as restaurant that is closed in the
morning or in the evening;example 2:LUC data in a localized area fails to be represented by the typically selected fitted curve/weighted average rate-a small shop/LUC 820,AM peak hour is
skewed by the high y-intercept).
Equation T pe:Equation Used Equated Rate (T pe Abbreviations:Wei hted Avera a Rate("WA",Fitted Curve T pe:Equation Used[Equated Rate
LR-Apartments No Rail C:T=X*7.41[7.41] C:T=X*0.45[0.45] FC:T=0.43*X+20.55[0.50]
Box 5/13ox 9-Estimate Baseline Trips/Estimate Vehicular Trips(Apply Equations and in/out Distributions)
Baseline Vehicular Trips
• s
LR-Apanments No Rail 50% 1,019 1,019 2,038 24% 30 94 124 63% 88 51 139
Appendix E
Page 1 of 1 August 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Trip Generation
August 2022
Methodology Overview
This form facilitates trip generation estimation using data within the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)Trip Generation Manual,11th Edition and methodology described within ITE's Trip Generation
Handbook,3rd Edition.These references will be referred to as Manual and Handbook,respectively.The Manual contains data collected by various transportation professionals for a wide range of different
land uses,with each land use category represented by a land use code(LUC).Average rates and equations have been established that correlate the relationship between an independent variable that
describes the development size and generated trips for each categorized LUC in various settings and time periods.The Handbook indicates an established methodology for how to use data contained
within the Manual when to use the fitted curve instead of the average rate and when to adjustments to the volume of trips are appropriate and how to do so.The methodology steps are represented visually
in boxes in Figure 3.1.This worksheet applies calculations for each box if applicable.
Box 1-Define Study Site Land Use Type&Site Characteristics
The analyst is to pick an appropriate LUC(s)based on the subject's zoning/land use(s)/future land use(s).The size of the land use(s)is described in reference to an independent variable(s)specific to
(each)the land use(example:1,000 square feet of building area is relatively common).
Land Use Types and Size 0.2 FAR 2.4 RAR 43560 SF
Lot 1®High Turnover 10.803 1,000 square feet 931 High Turnover(Sit Down)Restaurant
Sit Down Restaurant
Lot 3:Hotel or Motel 178 Rooms 310 Hotel
Lot 4:Medical,Dental or Health Office 8 276 1,000 square feet 720 Medical-Dental Office Building
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 5:Medical,Dental or Health Office 8.102 1,000 square feet 720 Medical-Dental Office Building
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 6:Medical,Dental or Health Office 7 928 1,000 square feet 720 Medical-Dental Office Building
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 7:High Turnover 6.447 1,000 square feet 931 High Turnover(Sit Down)Restaurant
Sit Down Restaurant
Lot 8:Medical,Dental or Health Office 100.014 1,000 square feet 720 Medical-Dental Office Building
Buildin s and Clinics
Box 2•Define Site Context
Context assessment is to"simply determine whether the study sites is in a multimodal setting"and"could have persons accessing the site by walking,bicycling,or riding transit."This assessment is used in
Box 4.The Manual separates data into 4 setting categories-Rural,General Urban/Suburban,Dense Multi-Urban Use and Center City Core.This worksheet uses the following abbreviations,respectively:
R,G,D,and C.The Manual does not have data for all settings of all land use codes.See the table on the next page titled"Site Context and Time Periods"-if this table is not provided,the"General
Urban/Suburban"setting is used by default.
Box 3-Define Analysis Objectives Types of Trips&Time Period
This tool will focus on vehicular trips for a 24-hour period on a typical weekday as well as its AM peak hour and PM peak hour.Other time period(s)may be of interest.
Site Context and Time Periods-Actual Setting,Setting Data Available for LUC,Setting Used in Analyses
Lot 1®High Turnover C- al Urban/Suburban G G G B G G e G G B
Sit Down Restaurant
Lot 3:Hotel or Motel General Urban/Suburban G G C G G D C G G C G
Lot 4:Medical,Dental or Health Office General LItarYSutxarban G G G G G G G
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 5:Medical,Dental or Health Office General UrbaniSub urban G G G G G G G
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 6:Medical,Dental or Health Office General Urban/Suburban G G G G G G JG
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 7:High Turnover GeneraltkbaNsuburban G G G G G G Sit Down RestaurantLot 8:Medical,Dental or Health Office GeneraltkbaniSuburban G G G G G G
Buildings and Clinics
If the desired setting is not available within the Manual,adjustments may be made in Boxes 6 through 8.
Per the Handbook,"if the objective is to establish a local trip generation rate for a particular land use or study site,the simplified approach(Box 9)may be acceptable but the Box 5 through 8 approach is
Box 5113ox 9-Estimate Baseline Trips/Estimate Vehicular Trips(Determine Equation)
Vehicle trips are estimated using rates/equations applicable to each LUC.When the appropriate graph has a fitted curve,the Handbook has a process(Figure 4.2)to determine when to use it versus using
the weighted average rate or collecting local data.The methodology requires for engineering judgement in some circumstances and permits engineering judgement to override or make adjustments when
appropriate to best project(example 1:study site is expected to operate differently than data in the applicable land use code-such as restaurant that is closed in the morning or in the evening;example 2:
LUC data in a localized area fails to be represented by the typically selected fitted curve/weighted average rate-a small shop/LUC 820,AM peak hour is skewed by the high y-intercept).
Equation Type:Equation Used[Equated Rate](Type Abbreviations:Weighted Average Rate "WA",Fitted Curve("FC"),or Custom("C"
Lot 1•High Turnover WA:T=X*107.2[107.20] WA:T=X*9.57+[9.57] WA:T=X*9.05•[9.05]
Sit Down Restaurant
Lot 3:Hotel or Motel WA:T=X*7.99[7,99] FC:T=0.5*X-7.45[0.46] FC:T=0.74*X-27.89[0,58]
Lot 4:Medical,Dental or Health Office FC:T=42.97*X-108.01[29,921 FC:LN(T)=0.9*LN(X)+1.34[3,09] FC:T=4.07*X-3.17[3,69]
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 5:Medical,Dental or Health Office FC:T=42.97*X-108.01[29.641 WA:T=X*3.1[3.10] WA:T=X*3.93[3.93]
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 6:Medical,Dental or Health Office FC:T=42.97*X-108.01[29,351 FC:LN(T)=0.9*LN(X)+1.34[3.10] WA:T=X*3.93[3,93]
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 7:High Turnover WA:T=X*107.2[107.201 WA:T=X*9.57[9.57] WA:T=X*9.05[9.05]
Sit Down Restaurant
Lot 8:Medical,Dental or Health Office WA:T=X*36[36,001 FC:LN(T)=0.9*LN(X)+1.34[2,41] WA:T=X*3.93[3,93]
Buildings and Clinics
Box 5/Box 9-Estimate Baseline Trips/Estimate Vehicular Trips(Apply Equations and in/out Distributions)
Baseline Vehicular Trips
Lot 1:High Turnover 50% 579 579 1,158 55% 57 46 103 61% 60 38 98
(Sit Down)Restaurant
Lot 3:Hotel or Motel 50% 713 713 1,426 56% 46 36 82 51% 53 51 104
Lot 4:Medical,Dental or Health Office 50% 124 124 248 79% 21 5 26 30% 9 22 31
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 5:Medical,Dental or Health Office 50% 120 120 240 79% 20 5 25 30% 10 22 32
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 6:Medical,Dental or Health Office 50% 116 116 232 79% 20 5 25 30% 9 22 31
Buildings and Clinics
Lot 7:High Turnover 50% 346 346 692 55% 34 28 62 61% 35 23 58
Sit Down Restaurant
Lot 8:Medical,Dental or Health Office 50% 1,800 1,800 3,600 79% 190 51 241 30% 118 275 393
Buildings and Clinics
Totals 3,798 3,798 7,596 388 176 564 294 453 747
CivTech
Page 1 of 1 August 2022
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX F
TRIP DISTRIBUTION CALCULATIONS
C i v T e C h
2020 2030
v �
Quadrant Population Percent Employment Percent Population Percent Employment Percent
n North Northwest 4,283 5.3% 737 6.7% 5,550 5.4% 967 6.2% a
C c North Northeast 3,691 4.6% 491 4.4% 5,420 5.3% 601 3.9% Q°
C North 7,975 9.9% 1,228 11.1% 10,970 10.7% 1,567 10.1%
East Northeast 9,170 11.4% 970 8.8% 13,369 13.1% 1,233 7.9% s
to East Southeast 9,170 11.4% 970 8.8% 13,369 13.1% 1,233 7.9%
East 18,340 22.8% 1,940 17.6% 26,738 26.2% 2,466 15.8% --1
3 South Southeast 11,069 13.8% 878 7.9% 13,883 13.6% 1,378 8.9% D
a�
South Southwest 9,520 11.9% 1,222 11.1% 11,095 10.9% 2,018 13.0% D
N South 20,590 25.7% 2,099 19.0% 24,978 24.5% 3,396 21.9%
West Southwest 16,675 20.8% 3,117 28.2% 20,847 20.4% 4,520 29.1%
CD
West Northwest 16,636 20.7% 2,672 24.2% 18,523 18.1% 3,563 23.0% C-
West 33,311 41.5% 5,789 52.4% 39,370 38.5% 8,082 52.1%
Totals 80,216 99.9% 11,056 100.1% 102,056 99.9% �rt
15,512 99.9/o C
Radii northern limits
Population radius: 10 miles
- Employment radius: 10 miles NNW NNE
m
-. 2020 2030 2020 2030
Select Analysis Year(2020, 2030, 2040,2050) 5.3% 5.4% 4.6% 5.3%
2020 WNW 6.7% 6.2% 4.4% 3.9% ENE
4,
2020 2030 2020 2030 n
20.7% 18.1% 11.4% 13.1% CD
N 24.2% 23.0% 8.8% 7.9% (D
0
' 2020 2030 2020 2030 '
20.8% 20.4% 11.4% 13.1% to
28.2% 29.1% 8.8% 7.9% ,
tQ
WSW 2020 2030 2020 2030 ESEp
11.9% 10.9% 13.8% 13.6%
-n 11.1% 13.0% T9% 8.9% >
m
Cr
Pop% SSW SSE CD
K Q Em % N
o x southern limits c
m .�
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX G
BACKGROUND GROWTH CALCULATIONS
C i v T e C h
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Background Traffic Calculations
Location of counts. US-60 Exit 198 A-Ramp just West of Goldfield Rd (Location ID: 6980)
ADOT Traffic Counts
available at
https://adot.public.
ms2soft.com/tcds/ts
earch.asp?loc=Adot
Source(s): &mod=TCDS
Year Volume
Start 2018 1,141
End 2019 1,163
AAGR 1.90%
Exp Factor 1.019
Growth Rate Used 2.0%
Per-Year Multiplier 1.020 2024
2027
Expansion
Year Factor(s)
2022 1.000 Existing
2023 1.020
2024 1.040 Opening
2025 1.061
2026 1.082
2027 1.104 Horizon
2028 1.126
2029 1.149
2030 1.172
2031 1.195
2032 1.219
2033 1.243
2034 1.268
2035 1.294
2036 1.319
2037 1.346
2038 1.373
2039 1.400
2040 1.428
2041 1.457
2042 1.486
2043 1.516
2044 1.546
2045 1.577
2046 1.608
2047 1.641
2048 1.673
2049 1.707
2050 1.741
2051 1.776
2052 1.811
2053 1.848
2054 1.885
Appendix G
Page 1 July 2021
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX H
2024 NO BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
C i v T e C h
2024 Background AM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy 2024 Background PM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.2 Int Delay,s/veh 2.3
Lane Configurations tt Lane Configurations tt
Traffic Vol,v,-h/h 59 0 0 0 0 116 Traffic Vol,vehlb 59 0 0 0 r 0 192
Future Vol,veh/h 59 0 0 0 0 116 Future Vol,veh/h 59 0 0 0 0 192
Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Channellmd - None None - None FIT Channelized - None None None
Storage Length 0 195 - Storage Length 0 195 -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Von In Median Storage,# D 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 25 25 80 85 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 25 25 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 74 0 0 0 0 136 Mvmt Flow 74 0 0 0 0 226
Conflicting Flow All 68 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 113 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 stage 1 0
Stage 2 68 Stage 2 113
Critical Hdwy 6.04 4,14 Critical Hdwy 6,84 4,14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg I - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5,84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 929 0 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver $72 0 -
Stage I - 0 Stage 1 - 0
Stage 2 947 i 0 Stage;2 899 a
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 929 s - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 872
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 929 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 872
Stage 1 Stage I
Stage 2 947 Stage 2 899
HCM Control Delay,a 9,2 0 HCM Control Delay,a 9.5 0
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veb/h) 929 Capacity{veh/h) 872
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.079 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085
HCM Controf Delay(s) 9.2 0 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.5 0
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th%tile 0(veh) 03 HCM 95th%ble 0(veh) 0.3
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2024 Background AM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy 2024 Background PM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3 Int Delay,s/veh 2.9
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations +t
Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 17 0 0 59 9 0 188 39 0 0 0 Traffic Vol,vehlin 0 20 0 0 59 5 0 180 58 0 0 0
Future Vol,veh/h 0 17 0 0 59 9 0 188 39 0 0 0 Future Vol,vehlh 0 20 0 0 59 5 0 180 58 0 0 0
Conflicting Pods,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
PIT Channelized None Stop Yield None FIT Channelized None Stop Yield None
Storage Length 0 0 Storage Length 0 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 i 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 25 25 25 Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 25 25 26
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 21 0 0 74 11 0 221 49 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 25 0 0 74 6 0 212 73 0 0 0
Conflicting Flow All - 221 - - 221 111 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow All - 212 - - 212 106 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 221 stage 1 0 212 -
Stage 2 221 0 Stage 2 212 0 -
Crificall Hdwy 644 6.54 6,94 Critical Hdwy 6,54 6,54 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg I - 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54 -
Crifical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.54
Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 4.02 3.32 Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 4.02 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 676 0 0 676 921 0 Pot COP-1 Maneuver 0 684 0 0 684 928 0
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 719 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0 726 - 0
Stage 2 0 719 0 0 - - 0 stage,2 0 726 0 0 - - 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 676 - - 676 921 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 684 - 684 928
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 676 676 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 684 684 -
Stage 1 719 Stage 1 726
Stage 2 719 - Stage 2 726 -
HCM Control Delay,a 10,5 101 0 HCM Control Delay,a 10,5 10,7 0
HCM LOS B B HCM LOS B B
Capacity(veh1h) 676 676 921 capacity(veh/h) 684 684 928
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 0.109 0.012 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.108 0.007
HCM Controf Delay(s) 10.5 11 9 HCM Control Defay(s) 10,5 10,9 8,9
HCM Lane LOS B B A HCM Lane LOS B B A
HCM 95th%flte Q(vefi) 01 014 0 HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 01 0,4 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2024 Background AM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01d West Hwy Exit 2024 Background PM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01d West Hwy Exit
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.8 Int Delay,s/veh 2.2
Lane Configurations r tf tt Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol,vehlb r 0 168 59 0 0 176 Traffic Vol,vehih 0 114 123 0 0 251
Future Vol,veh/h 0 168 59 0 0 176 Future Vol,veh/h 0 114 123 0 0 251
Conflicting Reds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Chandelized None None None FIT Channelized None None None
Storage Length 0 - Storage Length 0 -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 85 80 So 80 85 Peak Hour Factor 80 85 65 80 i 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 198 74 0 0 207 MvmtFlow 0 134 145 0 0 295
Conflicting Flow All - 37 0 - - - Conflicting Flow All - 73 0 - - -
Stage 1 Stagei I
Stage 2 Stage 2
Crifical Hdwy 6,94 CriffeaJ Hdwy &94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg I -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy 3,32 Follow-up Hdwy 3,32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 1027 0 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 974 0 0
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0
Stage 2 0 0 0 Stage''2 0 - 0 a
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1027 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 974 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -
Stage I Stage I
Stage 2 Stage 2
HCM Control Delay,a U 0 a HCM Control Delay,a 93 0 0
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh/h) 1027 Capacity(vsh/h) 974
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.192 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.138
HCM Control Delay(s} a3 HCM Control Delay(s) 93
HCM Lane LOS A HCM Lane LOS A
HCM 95th%fle Q(veh) 03 HCM 95th Mile Q(veh) 0.5
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2024 Background AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2024 Background PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
t 4e
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations r tt ttf
Traffic Volume(vph) 7 0 17 35 105 162 128 Traffic Volume(vph) 20 0 42 28 162 211 91
Future Volume(vph) 7 0 17 35 105 162 128 Future Volume(vph) 20 0 42 28 162 211 91
Tom Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 i 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 H 8,0 H 20,0 20.0 20,0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 U 8,0 5.0 20,0 20,0 20,0
Minimum Split(a) 44,9 40 40 10,13 31,6 31-6 31.6 Minimum Split(a) 44.9 44,9 49 %6 34,15 31,6 31,6
Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 11.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 11.0 34.0 34.0 34.0
Total Split(1/0) 50,01/6 50.0% 50.0% 12.21% 37.8% 37,8% 37,81 Total Split(%) 50,0% 50L0% SON 12,2% 37,8% 37.81% 37.8%
Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16 Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16
All-Red Time(s) 2.0 2.0 2,0 10 2.Or 2.0 2,0 All-Red Time(s) 2.0 10 2.0 ZO 10 2.0 10
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time(a) 5,9 5.9 5.9 5,6 U 5,6 54 Total Lost Time{s) 5,9 5,9 6,9 516 5.6 5.6 U
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Lerigft 90
Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection
Natural Cycle:90 Nature[Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps
4111(R) r1it'l, 1 02 403
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2024 Background AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 VVB Ramps 2024 Background PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 VVB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silve,ray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations r tt ttf r Lane Configurations 41 tt ttf r
Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 0 7 0 17 35 105 0 0 162 128 Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 0 20 0 42 28 162 0 0 211 91
Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 7 0 17 35 105 0 0 162 128 Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 20 0 42 28 162 0 0 211 91
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5,6 H 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5.6 H 5,6 5.6
Lane Util,Factor 0L95 0 91 0.95 100 0.95 021 lko Lane U111.Factor 0,95 0,91 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 ILOG
Fri 1.00 0.86 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fri 1.00 0,87 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 0,95 1.00 1Z 4,95 140 1.00 1,00 Fit Protected 0,95 0,99 1 Z 0.95 lbo 1.00 1 Z
Said,Flow(prof) 1681 1457 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583 Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1460 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583
Fit Permitted 0,95 1,00 1,00 0,63 1.00 1,00 1.00 Fit Permitted 0,95 0,99 1.00 0L59 1.00 1.00 1,00
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1457 1504 1167 3539 5085 1583 Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1460 1504 1102 3539 5085 1583
Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.25 025 0.25 0.80 1180 030 0.80 0,85 OM HO 0,85 0,85 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0,25 0.25 0.25 0,80 0,80 HO 0.80 0,85 0,80 0,80 0,85 (L80
Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 9 0 21 44 124 0 0 191 151 Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 25 0 52 35 191 0 0 248 114
RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 a 49 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 38
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 8 1 1 44 124 0 0 191 102 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 22 2 2 35 191 0 0 248 76
Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G is) 6.6 6.6 6.6 66.3 60.9 60.9 60.9 Actuated Green,G is) 7.6 7.6 7.6 65.3 59.9 59.9 59.9
Effective Green,g is) 6,6 H 6,6 66.3 60,9 6U 9 60L9 Effective,Green,g(a) 7.6 7$ 7,6 653 %9 69,9 59.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.74 0.68 0.68 0.68 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.73 0.67 0.67 0.67
Clearance Time(a) 5.9 5,9 5,9 6A 5.6 5,6 5.6 Clearance Time(a) 5.9 5.9 5,9 5,6 516 516 5,6
Vehicle Extension is) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 123 106 110 895 2394 3440 1071i Lane'Grp Cap(vph) 144 123 127 839 2365 3384 1053
v/s Ratio Prot CHO 0.04 0.04 v/s Ratio Prot c(LOO c0.05 0.05
via Ratio Perm C0.00 0,00 0.00 0,03 c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm C0,01 WDO 0.00 0.03 r 0,05
v1c Ratio 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.10 v1c Ratio 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.07 0.07
Uniform Delay,dl 38 8 381 383 12 4,9 4,9 &0 Uniform Delay,ill 38,2 3T6 37,8 3.5 5,3 53 53
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 0.62 1.00 1.00 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.65 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay,Q 0.1 0.0 H OA 0.0 0.0 0.2 Incremental Delay,d2 0,2 (LO 010 01 O'l (LO OA
Delay(s) 38.9 383 383 1.6 3.0 4,9 5,2 Delay(s) 38A 37,8 37,8 2.5 3.5 5,3 5.4
Level of Service D D 0 A A A A Level of Service D D D A A A A
Approach Delay is) 0.0 38.7 2.7 5.0 Approach Delay is) 0.0 38.0 3.4 5.4
Approach LESS A D A A Approach LOS A D A A
PSI'
HCM 2000 Control Delay 6,2 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.09 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.09
Actuated Cycle Length(a) WO Sum of lost fime(s) 17,1 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90,0 Sum of lost time(s) 17,1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8% ICU Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) is Analysis Period(min) 15
c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2024 Background AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2024 Background PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
Lane Group Plow(vph) 8 11 11 44 124 191 151 Lane Group Plow(vph) 22 28 28 35 191 248 114
We Ratio 0,05 0,05+ 0.05 US US 0.05 0,13 ulc Ratio 0,13 0,12 012 0,04 0,08 ON 0,10
Control Delay 37.8 0.4 0.4 1.3 3.3 5.3 1.3 Control Delay 37.4 1.0 1.0 2.2 3.9 5.8 1.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U O.0 0.0 Queue Delay O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.0
Total Delay 37.8 0.4 0.4 1,3 3.3 5.3 13 Total Delay 37.4 "0 1.0 2.2 3.9 5.8 1.6
Queue Length 50th(ft) 4 0 0 1 5; 12 0 Queue Length 50th(it) i 12 0 0 1 '' 8 16 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 16 0 0 3 9 19 16 Queue Length 95th(ft) 30 0 0 3 16 27 14
Internal Link Dist(11) 1339; 484' 300 Internal Link Dist(ft) 639 484 300
Turn Bay Length(it) 190 190 145 Turn Bay Length(it) 190 190 145
Base Capacity(vph) 730 688: 709 911 2439 3505 1137 Base Capacity(vph) 730 690 709 854 s 2400 3448 1110
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spilltiack Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SplOback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v1c Ratio 0,01 0,02 0.02 0,05 0,05•: 0.05 0.13 Reduced We Ratio 0.03 ON 0,04 0,04 0,08 0.07 0.10 ;
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2024 Background AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2024 Background PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
r'�„„,�; �,L.,.f.;f, .. irr .,Ya ...C-T4 r �, .T��. ""s?Y .f� „�,L.,,�„ z s„fit-. -•.��Y, ;�. s1 r=r"t: ��i�.. ,1................................ryY
Lane Configurations W r I tt Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume(uph) 77 0; 31 63 18 131 38 Traffic Volume(vph) 138 0 45 46 42 177 57
Future Volume(vph) 77 0 31 63 18 131 38 Future Volume(vph) 138 0 45 46 42 177 57
Turn Type Perm NA; Perm NA Perm; pm+pt NA Turn Type Perm ' NA Perm NA ;Perm pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 &0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0
Minimum Split(a) E44.9 44,9 44.9 31.6 31.6i 10.6 31.6 Minimum spin(s) 44.9 44,9 40 316 31.6 1Q.6 31.6
Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0
Total';Split(%) 50N 50.0°Ioi 5H% 37.80k 37.8% 12.2%a 37.8% Total Split(%) 50.0°1u 50.0% %0°la 37A% 37.8% 12.2°!0 37.8%
Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time(a) r 2A 2,0 2,0 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 AH-Red Time(a) 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time(a)i 5.9 U 5.9 H 5.6' 5.6 5.6 Total Lost Time(a) 5,9 ! 519 &9 5.6 5.6 H 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90
Offset 0(0%),Referenced to phase 1.NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset 0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green Master Intersection
Natural Cycle:90 Natural Cycle;90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
F3;
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4
2024 Background AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2024 Background PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silve,ray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations 4a +tt r tt Lane Configurations 41 ttt r I tt
Traffic Volume(vph) 77 0 31 0 0 0 0 63 18 131 38 0 Traffic Volume(vph) 138 0 45 0 f 0 0 0 46 42 177 57 0
Future Volume(vph) 77 0 31 0 0 0 0 63 18 131 38 0 Future Volume(vph) 138 0 45 0 0 0 0 46 42 177 57 0
Ideal iPlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 lsoo 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow(vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5.9 5,9 H 5,6 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5,9 H 5.6 5,6 5.6
Lane Util.Factor 0195 021 0,95 0191 1.00 I.00 095 Lane Uft Factor 0.95 021 0195 091 1 GO 1,00 0195
Frt 1.00 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Fit Protected 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1100 0.95 1.00 Fit Protected 0,95 0.96 1,00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1601 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539 Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1603 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539
Fft Permitted 0.95 096 1,00 1,00 1.00 0,70 1,00 Fit Permitted 0.95 0,96 1.00 1,00 1,00 0,72 i t00
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1601 1504 5085 1583 1305 3539 Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1603 1504 5085 1583 1333 3539 -Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.8585 0.80 0.8080 025 0.25 0,25 0.80 0,80 0,80 0.85 0,80 0.8080 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0,85 0.80 0.8080 0.2525 0.25 0,25 0.80 0,80 0.80T8 O 0.85 0,80 0
Adj.Flow(vph) 91 0 39 0 0 0 0 79 22 154 48 0 Adj.Flow(vph) 162 0 56 0 0 0 0 58 52 208 71 0
RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 44 32 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 77 46 0 0 0 0 a is 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow(vph) 47 4 3 0 0 0 0 79 16 154 48 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 84 7 4 0 0 0 0 58 35 208 71 0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 60.9 60.9 66.3 60.9 Actuated Green,G(s) 7.6 7.6 7.6 59.9 59.9 65.3 59.9
Effective Green,g(a) 6,6 6,6 6.6 60.9 60.9 66.3 60.9 Effective Green,g(.5) 7.6 7,6 7,6 %9 59,9 653 69,9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.68 0.68 0.74 0.68 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.67 0.67 0.73 0.67
Clearance Time(a) 5.9 5s 5.9 5,6 5.6 H 5.6 Clearance Time(a) 5.9 &S &9 5,6 5,6 516 5.6
Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 11 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 12 12 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 123 117 110 3440 1071 989 2304 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 141 136 127 3384 1053 993 i 2355
v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 C0.01 0.01 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 C0.01 0.02
v/s Ratio Perm c0,03 0.00 0.00 0.01 80.11 v1s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.00 0.00 0 02 c0,14
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.02 v1c Ratio 0.60 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.21 0.03
Uniform Delay,dli 39.8 383 381 4,8 4,8 15 4,8 Uniform Delay,dl 393 37,9 37.8 5,1 51 4,0 5A
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.51 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.47 0.52
Incremental Delay,42 0.7 (LO 0.0 10 Out) 03 0.0 Incremental Delay,d2 4A 0A 0.0 0.0 OJ 0.5 (LO
Delay(s) 40.5 38s 38.7 4.8 4s 1.6 2A Delay(s) 44.2 37,9 37.9 5.1 5,2 2.4 2,7
Level ol'Service D 0 D A A A A Leval of Service D 0 D A A A A
Approach Delay(s) 39.4 0.0 4.8 1.8 Approach Delay(s) 40.3 0.0 5.2 2.4
Approach LOS D A A A Approach LOS D A A A
HCM 2000 Control Delay 13,8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Control Delay 1615 HCM 2000 Level of Service 13
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.18 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.25
Actuated Cycle Length(a) WO Sum of lost time(a) 17,1 Actuated Cycle Length(a) 9010 Sum of lost Ifirre,(a) 17,1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8% ICU Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 15 Analysis Period(min) Is
c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6
2024 Background AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2024 Background PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
Lane Group Plow(vph) 47 48 35 79 23 154 48 Lane Group Plow(vph) 84 84 50 58 53 208 71
vlcRatio 0,31 020 0.15 0,02 0,02 015 OW ft Ratio 0,49 0.33 021 002 US 0,21 003
Control Delay 43.7 2.7 1.4 5.4 0.1 1.3 2.8 Control Delay 47.6 9.7 3.0 6.1 0.3 1.9 3.2
Queue belay 010 0.0 (L 010 O,Di 0.0 U Queue Delay 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 U 0 0 010
Total Delay 43.7 23 1.4 5A 0.1 1.3 2,8 Total Delay 47.6 93 10 6.1 0.3 1.9 3,2
Queue Length 50th(ft) 27 0 0 5 0 0 1 Queue Length 50th(ft) 49 0 0 3 0 1 2
Queue Length 95th(ft) 57 0 0 9 0 4 3 Queue Length 95th(ft) 87 25 0 8 0 15 6
Internal Link Dist(11) 535 222 484 Internal Link;Dist.(ft) 5M 222 484
Turn Bay Length(ft) 130 130 115 Turn Bay Length(ft) 130 130 115
Base;Capacity(vph) 730 750 709 3505 1123 1006 2439 Base Capacity(vph) 730 752 709 3448 1106 1009 2400
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 Spilltrack Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vtc Ratio; 0.06 0,06, 0,05 ,(LO2 U2! 0.15 0.02 Reduced We Ratio 0.12 0„11 OV 0.02 US 0.21 0,03 1
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5
2024 Background AM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access 2024 Background PM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 2.4 Int Delay,s/veh 2.7
Lane Configurations 4x 4a 0 Lane Configurations +t r ) 0
Traffic Vol,v,-hth 3 2 0 2 1 22 0 74 8 20 38 3 Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 0 1 4 i 0 29 1 67 8 29 59 9
Future Vol,veh/h 3 2 0 2 1 22 0 74 8 20 38 3 Future Vol,veh/h 5 0 1 4 0 29 1 67 8 29 59 9
Conflicting Parts,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
FIT Channerized None None None I - None PIT Channelized Norte None None None
Storage Length 50 - 50 50 - Storage Length 50 - 50 50
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Van in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 - 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 go go 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mwat Flow 4 3 0 3 1 28 0 93 10 25 48 4 Mvmt Flow 6 0 1 5 0 36 1 84 10 36 74 11
Conflicting Flow All 147 203 26 169 195 47 52 0 0 103 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 196 248 43 195 243 42 85 0 0 94 0 0
Stage I too 100 93 93 - Stage 1 152 152 - 86 86 -
Stage 2 47 103 76 102 - Stage 2 44 96 - 109 157 -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 8.54 6,94 7,54 6,54 6,94 414 414 critical Hdwy 7.54 &54 6,94 7,54 6,54 694 4,14 4,14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - -
Criticall Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 &54 6.54 5,54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.64 - 6.54 5.54 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 132 2.22 2,22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 132 2.22 2,22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 807 692 1044 779 699 1012 1552 1487 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 771 669 1050 772 674 1019 1531 1498
Stage 1 895 811 - 904 817 - - - Stage 1 857 784 - 912 823 - -
stage 2 961 809 - 924 810 - Stageii2 965 816 909 780 - -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 1
MovCap-1 Maneuver 774 680 1044 767 687 i1012 1552 1487 Mov,Cap-1 Maneuver 729 662 1050 756 667 1019 1531 1498
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 774 680 - 767 687 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 729 652 - 756 657 - - -
Stage 1 895 797 904 817 stage 1 856 765 911 822
Stage 2 933 809 906 796 Stage 2 930 814 886 761
HCM Control Delay,a 10 8,8 0 2.4 HCM Control Delay,a 9.7 8.8 0.1 2,2
HCM LOS B A HCM LOS A A
Capacity jvahlh) 1552 733 969 1487 Capacity(veh/h) 1531 768 978 i 1498
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.009 0.032 0.017 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.01 0.042 0.024
HCM Control Delay(a) 0 10 8,8 7,6 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.4 91 8,8 7.5
HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-Atile 0(veh) 0 0 0.1 0.1 HCM 95th%tile 0(veh) 0 0 0.1 i 0.1
07/15/2022 Synchic 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchic 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 4
2024 Background AM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd 2024 Background PM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 Int Delay,s/veh 1.9
Lane Configurations tt Lane Configurations
Traft Vol,veWh 2 s 28 54 3 18 23 Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 18 58 5 i 14 51
Future Vol,veh/h 2 28 54 3 18 23 Future Vol,veh/h 2 18 58 5 14 51
Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Pods,#/br 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Charinelized - None None - None FIT Chiannefized - None None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - Storage Length 0 50 -
Veft in Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvrnt Flow 3 35 68 4 23 29 Mvmt Flow 3 23 73 6 18 64
Conflicting Flow All 131 36 0 0 72 0 Conflicting Flow All 144 40 0 0 79 0
Stage 1 70 - - - stage 1 76 - - - - -
Stage 2 61 - Stage 2 68 -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6,94 414 Critical Hdwy 6,84 6,94 4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg,2 5,84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 850 102R 1526 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver B58 1022 1517
Stage 1 945 Stage 1 938 - -
Stage 2 954 stage 2 968
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,% 1
Mov CapA Maneuver 837 1029 1526 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver W 1022 1517
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 812 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 819 - -
Stage 1 945 Stage I 938
Stage 2 940 Stage 2 956
HCMi Control Delay,a 8.7 0 3,2 HCM Control Delay,a 8.7 0 1.6
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Ilk
Capacity(veh1h) j 1011 1526 Capacity(veh/h) 997 1517
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.015 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.012
HCM Control Delay(s) 8.7 7A HCM Control Defay i(s) 81 7A
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th Utle 0(veh) 01 0 HCM 95th 1/6111e, 0A 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 5 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 5
2024 Background AM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access 2024 Background PM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 1.4 Int Delay,s/veh 1.1
bpi
Lane Configurationsr Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol,vehlh 6 15 29 1 3 1 Traffic Vol,vehlin 2 28 10 0 1 3
Future Vol,veh/h 6 15 29 1 3 1 Future Vol,veh/h 2 28 10 0 1 3
Conflicting Reds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Chairinefized Nom None - None FIT Channelized None Norte . None
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 60 90 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 19 36 1 4 1 Mvmt Flow 3 35 13 0 1 4
Conflicting Flow All 37 0 - 0 72 37 Conflicting Flow All 13 0 - 0 54 13
Stage 1 37 - stage 1 13 -
Stage 2 - 35 - Stage 2 - 41 -
Critical Hdwy 4,12 6A2 622 Critical Hdwy 412 642 6.22
Critical Hdwy Sig I - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
critical Hdwy Stg 2 . 6.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5,42 1
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1574 932 1035 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 954 1067
Stage I - 985 - Stage I - 1010 -
Stage 2 987 stage;,2 - 981 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mey Cap-1 Maneuver 1574 927 ^1035 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 952 1067
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 927 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 952 -
stage 1 980 Stage?1 1008
Stage 2 - 987 Stage 2 - 981
HCM Control Delay,a 21 0 8,8 HCM Control Delay,s 05 0 8.5
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh/h) 1574 - 952 Capacity(veh1h) 1606 1036
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.005 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.005
HCM Control Delay(a) 73 0 &.8 HCM Controf Delay(a) 7.2 0 8,5
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th'/.file Q(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 6 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 6
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX I
2027 NO BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
C i v T e C h
2027 Background AM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy 2027 Background PM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.3 Int Delay,s/veh 2.3
Lane Configurations tt Lane Configurations tt
Traffic Vol,veh(h 63 0 0 0 0 8 124 Traffic Vol,vehin 62 0 0 0 0 204
Future Vol,veh/h 63 0 0 0 0 124 Future Vol,veh/h 62 0 0 0 0 204
Conflicting Pads,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Channelized None None - None RT Channelized None None - None
Storage Length 0 195 - Storage Length 0 195 -
Veh in Median Storage,It 0 0 - 0 Van In Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 25 25 80 85 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 25 25 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 79 0 0 0 0 146 Mvmt Flow 78 0 0 0 0 240
Conflicting Flow All 73 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 120 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 stage 1 0
Stage 2 73 Stage 2 120
Critical Hdwy 6,84 4,14 t critical Hdwy 6.84 04
Critical Hdwy Sig I - Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - -
Critical Hcwy Sig 2 5,84 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 - 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 922 0 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 863 0
Stage 1 - 0 Stage 1 - 0
Stage 2 941 0 Stage 2 892 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
MoVCaP-1 Maneuver 922 i Mov,Cap-1 Maneuver 863
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 922 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 863
Stage I Stage;1
Stage 2 941 Stage 2 892
HCM Control Delay,a 93 0 HCM Control Delay,a 9,6 0
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(vohlh) 922 Capacity(veh/h) 863
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.09
HCM Control Delay(a) 9.3 0 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.6 0
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th%tifla 0(veh) 0.3 HCM 95th%tile 0(veh) 03
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2027 Background AM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy 2027 Background PM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 Int Delay,s/veh 2.9
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations t tt
Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 18 0 0 63 10 0 200 41 0 0 0 Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 21 0 0 62 6 0 191 i61 0 0 0
Future Vol,veh/h 0 18 0 0 63 10 0 200 41 0 0 0 Future Vol,veh/h 0 21 0 0 62 6 0 191 61 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Chainnelized None Stop Yield None FIT Charrittelized Norte Stop Yield None
Storage Length - 0 0 Storage Length 0 0
Veft in Median Storage,# a 0 - 0 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# • 0 0 - 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade,% 0 0 - 0 - 0
Peak Hour factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 60 25 25 25 Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 25 25 25
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 23 0 i 0 79 13 0 235 51 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 26 0 0 78 8 0 225 76 0 0 0
Conflicting Flow All 235 235 118 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 225 225 113 0 0
Stage 1 0 235 Stage 1 0 225
Stage 2 235 0 - Stage 2 225 0
Critical Hdwy 6,54 6,54 6,94 Critical Hdwy Uzi 6.54 6,94
Critical Hdwy Stg I - 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.54 - - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5,54
Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 4.02 3.32 Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 4.02 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 664 0 0 664 912 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 673 0 0 i 673 918 0
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 709 - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0 716 - 0
Stage 2 0 709 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 716 0 0 a
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov 6ap-1 Maneuver 664 664 j 912 Mov Gap-1 Maneuver 673 - 673 918
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 664 664 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 673 673
Stage 1 709 Stage;I - 716
Stage 2 709 - Stage 2 716 -
HCM Control Delay,a 10.6 10.9 0 HCM Control Delay,a 10.6 10,8 0
HCM LOS B B HCM LOS B B
Capacity(vehlh) 664 664 912 Capacity(vsh1h) 673 673 918
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 0.119 0.014 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.115 0.008
HCM Control Delay(s) %6 11.2 9 HCM Control Delay(a) 10.6 11 S
HCM Lane LOS B B A HCM Lane LOS B B A
HCM 95th Ue Q(veh) U 0.4 0 HCM 95th%tfle Cloven) 01 0.4 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2027 Background AM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01d West Hwy Exit 2027 Background PM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01d West Hwy Exit
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.9 Int Delay,s/veh 2.2
Lane Configurations r tf tt Lane Configurations r tt tt
Traffic Vol,vWh 0 179 62 0 0 186 Traffic Vol,vehih 0 121 130 0 0 266
Future Vol,veh/h 0 179 62 0 0 186 Future Vol,veh/h 0 121 130 0 0 266
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Charinelized None None None FIT Channel zed None None None
Storage Length 0 - Storage Length 0 -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Metan Storage,# 0 - 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 85 80 80 80 85 Peak Hour Pactor 80 85 85 80 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 211 78 0 0 219 Mvmt Flow 0 142 153 0 0 313
Conflicting Flow All - 39 0 - - - Conflicting Flow All - 77 0 - - -
Stage 1 stage I
Stage 2 Stage 2
Critical Hdwy 894 Critical Hdwy 6,94
Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - Critical Hdwy Sig 1
critical Hdwy Stg 2 Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy 3,32 Follow-up Hdwy - 3,32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 1024 0 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 968 0 0
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0
Stage 2 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1024 - - Mov Cal Maneuver 968
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -
Stage 1 Stage I
Stage 2 Stage 2
HCM Godard Delay,a 94 0 0 HCM Control Delay,a 9,4 a a
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veb1h) 1024 capacity(veh1h) 968
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.147
HCM Control Delay(a) 94 HCM Control Defay(s) 9.4
HCM Lane LOS A HCM Lane LOS A
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0,8 HCM 95th'kille Q(veh) 0,5
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2027 Background AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2027 Background PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
t
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations r tt ttf
Traffic Volume(vph) 8 0 18 38 Ill 170 133 Traffic Volume(vph) 21 0 42 30 169 223 95
Future Volume(vph) 8 0 18 38 ill 170 133 Future Volume(vph) 21 0 42 30 169 223 95
Tom Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm NA Perm pnn+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 H 8,0 H 20,0 20.0 20,0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 U 8,0 H 20.0 20,0 20,0
minimum split($) 444 44.9 44,9 10.6 31.6 31.6 31.6 Minimum Split(a) 40 49 44,9 10.6 31,6 31,6 31,6
Total Split(s) 45+0 45.0 45.0 11+0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 11+0 34.0 34.0 34.0
Total Split(%) 500% 50,0% 5(L()% 12.2% 37.8% 37.80% 37,81% Total Split(%) 50,0% 50,,()% 50,01% 12.2% 37.8% 3731/6 37,81%
Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16 Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16
All-RedTime(s) 10 2,0 2,0 2.0 10 2,0 2,0 All-Red Time(a) ZO 10 ZO 10 2,0 2,0 2,0
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time is) 5.9 5,9 5.9 5,6 5,6 5,6 U Total Lost Time(a) 5.9 5.9 59 5,6 5,6 5,6 51
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Length.,90 Actuated Cycle Length,90
Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase I:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection
Natural Cycle'.90 Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps
4 95 1#4 #5 4 #5 4 95 #4 #5
(R) 4\ "Nsoz 03
valmr,
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2027 Background AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 VVB Ramps 2027 Background PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 VVB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations 1 4.11 r tt ttf r Lane Configurations 41 tt ttf r
Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 0 a 0 18 38 111 0 0 170 133 Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 0 21 0 42 30 169 0 0 223 95
Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 8 0 18 38 ill 0 0 170 133 Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 21 0 42 30 169 0 0 223 95
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900i 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5,6 5.6
Lane U11111,Factor 0,95 O'Rl 0195 1 DO 0.95 0191 'LOO Lane Ulfif.Factor 0.95 0.011 0.95 1100 0195 091 1.00
Fri 1.00 0.86 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fri 1.00 0.87 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 0.96 100i 140 0.95 f.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected (L95 0.99 lb() 0.95 1.00 1,00 140
Said,Flow(prof) 1681 1456 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583 Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1460 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583
Fit Permitted 025 1,00 100 062 IS 1100 'LOO Fit Permitted 0,95 0.99 1100 058 1.00 1.00 1,00
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1456 1504 1157 3539 5085 1583 Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1460 1504 1087 3539 5085 1583
Peak-hour factor,PHF 0,25 0.25 0.25 0,80 0,80 0.110 0,80 0,85 0.80 0,80 0,85 0,85 Peak-hour factor,PHI` 0.25 0.25 0,25 0,80 0.80 HO 0,80 0,85 180 0.80 0,85 0.85
Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 10 0 22 48 131 0 0 200 156 Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 26 0 52 38 199 0 0 262 112
RTOR Reduction(yph) 0 0 0 0 it 11 a 0 0 0 0 51 RTOR Reduction{vph) 0 0 0 0 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 38
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 9 1 1 48 131 0 0 200 105 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 23 2 2 38 199 0 0 262 74
Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm i NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.7 6.7 6.7 66.2 60.8 60.8 60.8 Actuated Green,G(s) 7.8 7.8 7.8 65.1 59.7 59.7 59.7
Effective Green,g(a) 61 6,7 6.7 66.2 608 60,8 60.8 Effective Green,g(a) 7.8 73 7.8 65.1 50,7 591 501
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.74 0.68 0.68 0.68 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.66
Clearance Time(a) 5,9 5.9 5.9 5,6 5.6 5.6 5,6 Clearance Time(a) 519 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5,6 5.6
Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 126 108 Ill 887 2390 3435 1069 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 145 126 130 827 2347 3373 1050
v/s Ratio Prot 00.00 0.04 0.04 v/s Ratio Prot cO.00 cO.06 0.05
via Ralto Perm c0,01 0,00 [LOO 0.04 CON via Ratio Perm C0.01 0,00 0.00 0103 0,05
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.10 vic Ratio 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.07
Uniform Delay,dl 38,8 38,6 38.6 33 4,9 L9 51 Uniform Delay,dl 381 37.6 37,6 3,6 5A 5A SA
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 0.61 1.00 1.00 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.65 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay,d2 OA 0,0 (LO 01 0,0 0,0 02 Incremental Delay,d2 02 0.0 Ok 011 O'l 0,0 OA
Delay(s) 38.8 38,6 38,6 1.6 3.0 5,0 5,3 Delay(s) 382 37,6 37,6 2.7 3.6 5.4 5.5
Level of Service D 0 D A A A A Level Of Service D 0 D A A A A
Approach Delay(s) 0.0 38.7 2.7 5.1 Approach Delay(s) 0.0 37.8 3.4 5.4
Approach LEIS A 0 A A Approach LOS A 0 A A
HCM 2000 Control Delay 63 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Control Delay I 8,5 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.09 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.09
Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90,0 Sum of lost fitne,(a) 17.1 Actuated Cycle Length(a) 90,0 Sum of lost rime(a) 171
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1% ICU Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 16 Analysis Period(min) 15
c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2027 Background AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2027 Background PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
Lane Group Plow(vph) 9 12 12 48 131 200 156 Lane Group Plow(vph) 23 28 28 38 199 262 112
WcRatio 6.06 0.05'; O05 0,05 O05 0,06 0,14 v/cRatio 0.13 0.12 011 005 0.08 (LO8 0.10
Control Delay 38.0 0.5 0.4 1.3 3.3 5.3 1.3 Control Delay 37.3 1.0 1.0 2.3 4.0 5.9 1.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0<0 (LO 0<O
Total Delay 38.0 0.5 0.4 1.3 3.3 5.3 1.3 Total Delay 37.3 "0 1.0 2.3 4.0 5.9 1.7
Queue Length 50th(ft) 5 01 0 1 5r 12 0 Queue Length 50th(11) , 12 0 0 2 9 17 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 17 0 0 3 9 20 17 Queue Length 95th(ft) 31 0 0 3 22 29 16
Internal Link Dist(it) 639 484; 300 Internal Link Dist(it) 639 484 300
Turn Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145 Turn Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145
Base Capacity(vph) 730 688', 709 903 2438 3504 1139 Base Capacity(vph) 730 690 709 840 s 2393 3439 1107
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sptllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced*Ratio l A.01 0,02: 0,02 0.05 0,05! 0,06 ON Reduced A Ratio 0.03 0.04 (L04 0.05 U8 0,08 0.10
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2027 Background AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2027 Background PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
r'�„„,�; �;,L.,.1,.;L, .. i�d .,T'a ...$-T4 r �, .T��. ""s?Y .�� „�,L.,,�„ z "g"„fit-. -•.�1T, ;�. sm rir"1: ��i�.. ,1................................ryY
Lane Configurations W r I tt Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume(uph) 81 0; 33 = 67 19 136 41 Traffic Volume(vph) 144 0 47 49 44 186 61 ,
Future Volume(vph) 81 0 33 67 19 136 41 Future Volume(vph) 144 0 47 49 44 186 61
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Permitted Phases! 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 &0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0
Minimum Split(a) 44.9 40 44,9 31.6 31.6 10.6 31.6 Minimum Split(s) 44.9 44.9 49 31.6 31.6 10,6 31.6
Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0
Total Split N %0% 50.0% 50.01% 37.8% 37.8% 122% 3T8% Total Split(%) 50.ffa SHIA *SON 37.8% i37.8% 1220A 37.81 j
Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time(a) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 10 AI-Red Time(s) 2.0 , 10 2 0 10 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 5,9 5.6 5.61 5.6 5,6 Total Lost Time(s) 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.6 56 &6
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead
Lead''=Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max
..z .....::.... . ...r,},}.�JJ Y.?5,{`4s••.))�'. 11\1����,� "�'�T'f[{ti"��d4'i''} �',�s` `{4�..rr�q{$ ,., tfS ��'��''�....,d n'��Y b`-'i7S'��': ,e..,t.}'r ,Y{�}}"€t,<y7}�'"�£'. �G�{?y"-4`�43"Y'�'}`�s`,}yS$ t'f'"4��j'�d?°�. gd+'�y��' `s€3�r�,`}""$�i 1'T'.;';r.��'u}`7`"J�z„ti�3d rq
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90
Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection
Natural'Cyclew,90 Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
1t 01 IBM
i �. C52
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4
2027 Background AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2027 Background PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations +tt r tt Lane Configurations 41 If ttt r I tt
Traffic Volume(vph) 81 0 33 0 0 0 0 67 19 136 41 0 Traffic Volume(vph) 144 0 47 0 0 0 0 49 44 186 61 0
Future Volume(vph) 81 0 33 0 0 0 0 67 19 136 41 0 Future Volume(vph) 144 0 47 0 0 0 0 49 44 186 61 0
Ideal Plow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow(vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5.9 5,9 H 5.6 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5,9 H 5.6 5,6 5.6
Lane Lffif.Factor 0.95 0,91 0195 0191 1,00 1.00 0.95 Lane UW.Factor 0,95 0.91 0.95 tLin 1,00 'LOO 0.95
Frt 1.00 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Fit Protected 0.95 (Lse 1.00 1,00 1.00 0,95 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 O'l)(i 1100 1,00 1.00 0,95 I 1.00
Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1601 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539 Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1603 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539
Fit Permitted 0,95 096i 1.00 1 u00 1.00 0.70 1,00 Fit Permitted 0.95 0.96 1,00 100 1.00 0711 1.00
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1601 1504 5085 1583 1299 3539 Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1603 1504 5085 1583 1329 3539
Peak-hour factor,PHIF 0.85 0.80 0.80 0,25 0,25 025 0,80 030 0,80 0.85 0,80 0,80 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.85 i 0,80 180 0,25 ± 0,25 025 0,80 0,80 0,80 0.85 0,80 4t80
Adj.Flow(vph) 95 0 41 0 0 0 0 84 24 160 51 0 Adj.Flow(vph) 169 0 59 0 0 0 0 61 55 219 76 0
RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 46 34 0 0 0 0 a 8 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 1 79 48 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow(vph) 49 4 3 0 0 0 0 84 16 160 51 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 88 8 5 0 0 0 0 61 36 219 76 0
Turn Type Perm NAi Perm NA Perm pM+pt NA Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.7 6.7 6.7 60.8 60+8 66.2 60.8 Actuated Green,G(s) 7.8 7.8 7.8 59.7 59+7 65+1 59.7
Effective Green,g(a) 63 6.7 6.7 60.8 60,8 66.2 60,8 Effective Green,g(s) 7.8 i 7.8 7 8 59.7 591 65A 591
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.68 0.68 0.74 0.68 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.66 0.66 0.72 0.66
Clearance Time(a) 5,9 5.9 5.9 51 5,6 5.6 H Clearance Time is) 5.9 5,9 5.9 5.6 5,6 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 12 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 125 119 111 3436 1069 983 2390 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 145 138 130 3373 1060 087 2347
v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 C0.01 0.01 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 C0.01 0.02
via Ratio Perm cO.03 0,00 0.00 0,01 co'll v/s Ratio Perm 00.05 0.00 OZ 0.02 c0L15
v1c Ratio 0.39 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.02 vic Ratio 0.61 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.22 0.03
Uniform Delay,dl 39.7 38.6 38.6 4.8 4,8 3.6 4.8 Uniform Delay,dl 39,6 3T7 373 52 5,2 41 5,2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 0.50 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.47 0.51
Incremental Delay,d2 0,7 00 0,0 0,0 (LO 04 Ob Incremental Delay,d2 4,8 01 0,0 0.0 O'l 0 0.0
Delay(s) 40.4 38.7 38.7 4.8 4,8 1.7 2A Delay(s) 44.5 37,8 37.7 5.2 53 2.5 2,7
Level of Service D D D A A A A Level of Service D D D A A A A
Approach Delay(s) 39.3 0.0 4.8 1.9 Approach Delay(s) 40.3 0.0 5.2 2.5
Approach LOS D A A A Approach LOS D A A A
HCM 2000 Control Delay 13,8 HCM 2000 Level of Service 13 HCM 2000 Control Delay 1(15 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.18 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.26
Actuated Cycle Length(a) 90,0 Sum of lost time(S) 171 Actuated Cycle Length(s) WO Sum of lostffine(a) 171
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45+1% ICU Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 15 Analysis Period(min) 15
c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6
2027 Background AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2027 Background PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
r'�„„,�; �,�.,.�.;1, .. )r .,T'a ...��4 r �, .��t� ..s?Y .��r „�,�.,,�,,, z g„fit-. -•.���, ;�. s7 r�"t: ��i�.. ,1................................r3Y
Lane Group Plow(vph) 49 50 37 84 24 160 51 Lane Group Plow(vph) 88 87 53 61 55 219 76
WcRatio 0,32 0,21 0,16 602 0.02 0,16 042 ftRatio Q.SQ ' 034 0,22 0,02 0,05 0,22 0,03
Control Delay 44.0 3.2 1.5 5.4 0.1 1.3 2.7 Control Delay 47.8 10.3 3.6 6.2 0.4 2.0 3.2
Queue Delay OA 0.0 0.0 O.O U 0.0 Q.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 U 0.0
Total Delay 44.0 3.2 1,5 5.4 0.1 1.3 2.7 Total Delay 47.8 10.3 3.6 6.2 0.4 2.0 3.2
Queue Length 50ti(ft) 28 0 0 5 0' 0 1 Queue Length 50th(ft) 51 0 0 4 0 1 2
Queue Length 95th(ft) 61 0 0 9 0 4 3 Queue Length 95th(ft) 91 27 2 8 1 16 7
Internal Link Dist(ft) 535, 222 494 Internal Link;Dist.(it) 535 222 484
Turn Bay Length(it) 130 130 115 Turn Bay Length(it) 130 130 115
Base Capacity(vph) 730 751; 709 3504 1123, 1000 _2438 Base Capacity(vph) 730 752 709 3439 1104 1004 2393
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillttack Cap Reductn 0 0i O 0 0 0 0 Spilltrack Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v}c Ratio; 0.07 0,07 U5 0.02 0.02 (L16 0.02 Reduced ytcRatio 0,12 0.12 0,07 0,022 0,05 0,22 0,03
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5
2027 Background AM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access 2027 Background PM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 2.4 Int Delay,s/veh 2.7
Lane Configurations 0 Lane Configurations +t r ) 0
Traffic Vol,v,-hth 3 2 0 2 1 23 0 78 9i 21 41 3 Traffic Vol,vehih 6 0 1 4 i 0 31 1 71 9 31 63 10
Future Vol,veh/h 3 2 0 2 1 23 0 78 9 21 41 3 Future Vol,veh/h 6 0 1 4 0 31 1 71 9 31 63 10
Conflicting Parts,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
FIT Channerized None None - None - None PIT Channel zed None None None . - None
Storage Length 50 50 50 - Storage Length 50 50 50 -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# G 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 - - 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 j 80 80 80 80 85 80 $0 80 80 Peak Hour Factor so to 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80i 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 3 0 3 1 29 0 92 11 26 51 4 Mvmt Flow 8 0 1 5 0 39 1 89 11 39 79 13
Conflicting Flow All 152 208 28 171 199 46 55 0 0 103 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 211 266 46 209 261 45 92 0 0 100 0 0
Stage 1 105 105 - 92 42 - - - Stage 1 164 W 91 91 -
Stage 2 47 103 - 79 107 - - - Stage 2 47 102 118 170 -
Critical Hdwy 7,54 654 624 7.54 6.54 6,94 4,14 4,14 Critical Hdwy T54 6.54 6.94 7,54 6,54 6,94 414 4,14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 6.54 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5,54 - 6.54 6,64 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 132 2.22 2,22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3,32 2.22 2,22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 828 764 1074 l802 712 1014 1570 y 1487 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 762 654 1045 754 658 1015 1521 1490
Stage 1 913 821 - 905 818 - - - Stage 1 843 775 - 906 819 - - -
Stage 2 961 809 . 946 820 - stage 2 S61 810 . 898 770
Platoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 1 Platoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 793 692 1074 790 700 i1014 1570 r 1487 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 708 636 1045 737 640 1015 1521 1490
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 793 692 - 790 700 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 708 636 - 737 640 - - -
Stage 1 913 807 905 818 stage;1 842 755 905 816
Stage 2 932 809 927 806 Stage 2 924 809 873 750
HCM Control Delay,a U 81 0 2A HCM Control Delay,a 9,9 8,9 0"1 22
HCM LOS A A HCM LOS A A
Capacity(vah/h) ± 1570 749 976 1487 capacity(veh/h) 1521 ± 742 973 1490
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.008 0.033 0.018 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.012 0.045 0.026
HCM Control Delay(a) 0 9.8 8,8 7.5 HCM Control Delay(s) 74 9.9 0 7.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HOM 95th I/We O(veh) 0 0 J)"! 0"I HCM 95th%file 0(veh) 0 0 01 011
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 4
2027 Background AM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd 2027 Background PM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 Int Delay,s/veh 1.8
Lane Configurations tt Lane Configurations Y til I tt
Traft Vol,veWh 2 30 67 3 19 24 Trafflic Vol,vehlb 2 19 62 6 14 64
Future Vol,veh/h 2 30 57 3 19 24 Future Vol,veh/h 2 19 62 6 14 54
Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 D 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Charinelized . None None - None FIT Channelized . None None - None
Storage Length 0 50 - Storage Length 0 50 -
VA-h in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 a 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 38 71 4 24 30 Mvmt Flow 3 24 78 8 18 68
Conflicting Flow All 136 38 0 0 75 0 Conflicting Flow All 152 43 0 0 86 0
stage 1 73 - stage 1 82
Stage 2 63 - Stage 2 70
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6,94 414 Critical Hdwy 6.84 &94 414
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - -
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6,84
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 844 1026 1522 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 848 1018 1508
Stage 1 941 - - Stage 1 932 - -
Stage 2 952 Stage 2 965 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,% 1
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 830 1026 1522 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver W 1018 1508
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 807 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 812 - -
stage 1 941 Stage,1 932
Stage 2 937 Stage 2 953
HCM Control Delay,a 8.7 0 13 HCM Controf Delay,s 81 0 1Z
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh1h) 1009 1522 Capacity(v,,hlh) 994 1508
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.016 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.012
HOM Control Delay(a) 81 7,4 HCM Control Delay(a) 81 7.4
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th'We 0(veh) 01 0 HCM 95th Ule O(veh) 011 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 5 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 5
2027 Background AM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access 2027 Background PM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 1.5 Int Delay,s/veh 1.1
bpi
Lane Configurations Y Lane Configurations Y
Traft Vol,veWh 7 15 31 1 3 1 Traffic Vol,veWh 2 30 11 0 1 3
Future Vol,veh/h 7 15 31 1 3 1 Future Vol,vehlh 2 30 11 0 1 3
Conflicting Peds,#1hr a 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Channefizod Node None . None FIT Channel zed None None . None
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh In Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvrnt Flow 9 19 39 1 4 1 Mvmt Flow 3 38 14 0 1 4
Conflicting Flow All 40 0 - 0 77 40 Conflicting Flow All 14 0 - 0 58 14
Stage I - 40 - Stage;;.1 - - 14 -
Stage 2 - 37 - Stage 2 - 44 -
UtIcal Hdwy 4,12 642 622 Critical Hdwy 4J 2 6,42 6,22
Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy ft 2 . 5.42 Criticat Hdwy Stg 2 5,42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 926 1031 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1604 949 1066
Stage 1 - 982 - Stage I - 1009 -
Stage 2 985 - Stage'2 - 978
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 920 11031 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1604 947 1066
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 920 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 947 -
Stage 1 976 Staged 1007
Stage 2 985 Stage 2 - 978
HCM Control Delay,a 2.3 0 8.8 HCM Control Delay,a 9t15 0 8,5
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(volh1h) 1570 945 Capacity(veh/h) 1604 1034
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.005 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.005
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.3 0 8.8 HCM corttroll Delay(t) 7.2 0 8.5
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th%file O(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th 1/ofile 0(veh) 0 a
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 6
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX J
2024 BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
,C4'0'--E—E, C i v T e c h
2024 Total AM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy 2024 Total PM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.2 Int Delay,s/veh 2.3
Lane Configurations tt Lane Configurations tt
Traffic Vol,v,-h/h 60 0 0 0 0 123 Traffic Vol,vehlb 64 0 0 0 r 0 215
Future Vol,veh/h 60 0 0 0 0 123 Future Vol,veh/h 64 0 0 0 0 215
Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,41hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Channelized - None, None - None FIT Channelized - None None - None
Storage Length 0 195 - Storage Length 0 195 -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 a 0 Von In Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 -- 0 Grade,% 0 0 -- 0
Peak Hour Factor c 80 60 25 25 80 85 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 25 25 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 76 0 0 0 0 145 Mvmt Flow 80 0 0 0 0 253
Conflicting Flow All 73 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 127 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 Stage'1 0
Stage 2 73 Stage 2 127
Critical Hdwy 6.84 4,14 Critical Hdwy 6.84 4J4
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 - 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 - 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 922 0 Pot Cap4 Maneuver 854 0 -
Stage 1 - 0 Stage 1 - 0
Stage 2 941 0 Stage!2 885 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 922 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 854 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 922 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 854
Stage I stage;1
Stage 2 941 Stage 2 885
HCM Control Delay,a 9.3 i 0 HCM Control Delay„a 9.7 0
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(VIhlh) 922 capacity(veh/h) 854
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.081 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.094
HCM Control Delay(a) 93 0 HCM Control Delay(a) 9.7 0
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th-!mile 0(veh) 0.3 HCM 95th Utle O(veh) 03
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2024 Total AM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy 2024 Total PM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 2.8 Int Delay,s/veh 2.9
Lane Configurations +t r Lane Configurations +t
Traffic Vol,vehilh 0 17 0 0 60 9 0 212 44 0 0 0 Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 20 0 0 64 5 0 194 61 0 0 0
Future Vol,veh/h 0 17 0 0 60 9 0 212 44 0 0 0 Future Vol,veh/h 0 20 0 0 64 5 0 194 61 0 0 0
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corifficting Pods,#/hr 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
FIT Chandolized Norio stop yield Norio FIT Chantrolized None stop yield None
Storage Length 0 0 Storage Length 0 0
Van in Modred Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 - - -0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0 - 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 26 25 25 Ptak Hour Factor 80 go 80 80 So 80 80 85 80 25 25 25
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 21 0 0 75 11 0 244 55 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 25 0 0 80 6 0 228 76 0 0 0
Conflicting Flow All - 249 - - 249 125 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow All - 228 - - 228 114 - 0 0
stage 1 0 249 - Stage,1 0 228 -
Stage 2 249 0 Stage 2 228 0 -
Critical Hdwy U4 6.54 &N Critical Hdwy &54 6.64 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54 -
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.54 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 - - 4.02 3.32 Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 4.02 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 653 0 0 653 902 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 670 0 0 670 917 0
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 699 - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0 714 - 0
Stage 2 0 699 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 714 0 0 - 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 653 - - 653 902 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 670 670 917 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 653 653 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 670 670 -
Stage 1 699 Stage'1 714
Stage 2 699 - Stage 2 714 -
HCM Control Delay,a 10,7 10,9 0 HCM Control Delay,s 10.6 10,9 0
HCM LOS B B HCM LOS B B
Capacity(veh/h) 653 663 902 Capacity(vish1h) 670 670 917
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 0.115 0.012 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.119 0.007
HCM Control Delay(a) 10.7 112 9 HCM Controf Delay(s) 10.6 111 9
HCM Lane LOS B B A HCM Lane LOS B B A
HCM 95th%ifle O(veh) 01 0.4 0 HCM 95th stile O(veh) 01 04 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchic 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2024 Total AM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01cl West Hwy Exit 2024 Total PM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01cl West Hwy Exit
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.6 Int Delay,s/veh 2
Lane Configurations ++ Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 168 88 0 0 185 Traffic Vol,vehih 0 114 140 0 0 278
Future Vol,veh/h 0 168 88 0 0 185 Future Vol,veh/h 0 114 140 0 0 278
Confli Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 i 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Channetized Nom None None FIT Channefized None None None
Storage Length 0 - - - Storage Length 0 -
Van in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Veh,in Metiltan Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 85 85 so 80 85 Peak Hour Factor 80 86 85 80 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 198 104 0 0 216 Mvmt Flow 0 134 165 0 0 327
Conflicting Flow All - 52 0 - - - Conflicting Flow All - 83 0 - - -
Stage 1 Stage I
Stage 2 Stage 2
Critical Hdwy &94 Critical Hdwy 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg I - Critical Hdwy Stg I
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy 3,32 Follow-up Hdwy - 3,32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver a 1005 0 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 960 0 a
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0
Stage 2 0 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1005 - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 960 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -
Stage I Stage I
Stage 2 Stage 2
HCM Control Delay,a 9.5 0 a HCM Control Delay,a 9.4 0 0
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh1h) 1005 9 Capacity(veh/h) 960
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.197 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.14
HCM:Control Delay(s) 9.5 HCM Control Delay(a) 9.4
HCM Lane LOS A HCM Lane LOS A
HCM 95th lAtile Q(veh) U HCM 95th%lite 0(veh) 0.5
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2024 Total AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2024 Total PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
4e t
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations 4+ ++
Traffic Volume(vph) 8 0 17 97 134 171 128 Traffic Volume(vph) 25 0 42 64 179 238 91
Future Volume(vph) 8 0 17 97 134 171 128 Future Volume(vph) 25 0 42 64 179 238 91
Tom Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 H 8,0 H 20,0 20.0 20,0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 H 8,0 H 20,0 20.0 20,0
Minimunn Split(at 444 44,9i 44,9 10,6 31s 31.6 31 k Minimum Split(a) 44,9 40 44,9 10,6 31.6 31,6 31,6
Total Split(s) 45+0 45.0 45+0 11+0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45+0 45+0 45.0 11+0 34.0 34.0 34.0
Total Split(%) 500% 50.0% 50.0% 112% 3T8% 37.8% 37,81% Total Split(IN 50.0% 50,01k 50.q1/6 112% 3T8% 37,81% 37,81/o
Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16 Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16
All-Red Time(a) 10 ZO 2,0 ZO 2,0 ZO ZO All-Red Time(a) 10 10 2.0 ZO 2.0 2,0 10
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time(a) 5,9 &9 5,9 5,6 5.6 5.6 5,6 Total Lost Time(a) 5,9 5,9 5 9 5.6 5.6 5,6 516
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Lead-Lag Optmhze7 Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Lengft 90 Actuated Cycle Length:90
Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection
Natural Cycle:90 Natural Cycle,,90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps
4 #5 1#4 #5 4 #5 4 *5 #4 #5
�N" "'03
g
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2024 Total AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2024 Total PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silve,ray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations 1 4.11 tt ttf r Lane Configurations 41x r tt ttf r
Traffic Volume(vph) 0 Or 0 a 0 17 97 134 0 0 171 128 Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 0 25 0 42 64 179 0 0 238 91
Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 8 0 17 97 134 0 0 171 128 Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 25 0 42 64 179 0 0 238 91
Ideal Flow(vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 19001 1900 1909 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 i1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5.6 H 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5,6 H 5,6 5.6
Lane U111.Factor 0,96 OM 0,95 1,00 0,95 0,91 1,00 Lane U01,Factor 0195 0,91 (t95 1 DO 0195 0,91 1 Z
Fri 1.00 0.86 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fri 1.00 0.87 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 0:95 1.00' 1,00 0,95 1.00 1.00 1,00 Fit Protected 0,95 0.99 1.00 0,95 1,00 1,00 1,00
Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1457 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583 Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1460 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583
Fit Permitted 0,95 1,00 1.00 0.62 1,00 1,00 1.00 Fit Permitted 025 < 0,99 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 100
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1457 1504 1155 3539 5085 1583 Said.Flow(Perm) 1681 1460 1504 1067 3539 5085 1583
Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.25 0.25 0,25 0,80 0,80 HO 0,85 0,85 0,80 0.80 0,85 0Z5 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.25 0.25 025 OZO 0,80 030 0,80 0,85 0,80 0,80 0.85 015
Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 10 0 21 114 158 0 0 201 151 Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 31 0 52 80 211 0 0 280 107
RTOR Reduction(vpb) 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 49 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 39
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 9 1 1 114 158 0 0 201 102 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 28 3 3 80 211 0 0 280 68
Turn Type Perm NA• Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 66.1 60.7 60.7 60.7 Actuated Green,G(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 62.9 57.5 57.5 57.5
Effective Green,g(a) 6.8 6,8 6.8 661 603 601 601 Effective Green,g(8) 10,0 10b WO 62.9 57,5 5T5 57,5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.73 0.67 0.67 0.67 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.70 0.64 0.64 0.64
Clearance Time(a) &9 5,9 5.9 5,6 5.6 5,6 5,6 Clearance Time(el 5.9 52 59 5.6 5,6 5.6 5,6
Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
L-Grp Cap(vph) 127 110 113 885 2386 3429 1067 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 186 162 167 787 2264 3246 1011
v/s Ratio Prot C0.01 0.04 0.04 v/s Ratio Prot C0.01 0.06 0.06
v/s Ratio Perm C6.01 0.00 0,00 C0,09 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm cO.02 0,00 0,00 00,06 0,04
v/c Ratio 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.07 0.06 0.10 v1c Ratio 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.07
Uniform Delay,dl 38.7 38,5 38.5 3.5 54 5,0 51 Uniform Delay,di 362 35,6 35,6 4A 62 6,2 6A
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.60 1.00 1.00 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.63 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay,Q 01 0,0 0.10 03 0.1 0.0 01 Incremental Delay,d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 03 OA 0.1 O'l
Delay(s) 38.8 38,5 38,5 1.8 3.0 5,0 5,3 Delay(s) 36.3 35,6 35,6 3.4 4.0 6,3 6,3
Level of Service D D D A A A A Level of Service D D D A A A A
Approach Delay(s) 0.0 38.6 2.5 5.1 Approach Delay(s) 0.0 35.9 3.8 6.3
Approach L08 A D A A Approach LOS A D A A
HCM 2000 Control Delay 5,6 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Control Delay 8,6 HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.12 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 011
Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90,0 Sum of It time(s) 17.4 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90,0 SUM Of lost time(a) 17.1
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8% ICU Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 15 Analysis Period(min) Is
c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2024 Total AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2024 Total PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
Lane Group Flow(vph) 9 11 11 114 158 201 151 Lane Group Flow(vph) 28 28 28 80 211 280 107
Wc Ratio 0,06 0,05i 0,05 0,13 0L06 0,06 0,13 Wc Ratio 0,15 OM 011 0110 009 0,09 0110
Control Delay 37.6 0.4 0.4 1.5 3.3 5.4 1.4 Control Delay 36.6 0.9 0.9 2.7 4.3 6.6 1.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 U U 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 U 0,0 U 0'0 0,0
Total Delay 37.6 OA 0.4 1,5 13 5.4 1.4 Total Delay 36.6 0,9 0.9 2,7 4,3 6.6 1,9
Queue Length 50th(ft) 5 0 0 2 6 13 0 Queue Length 50th(ft) 15 0 0 3 9 19 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 17 0 0 4 11 21 17 Queue Length 95th(ft) 34 0 0 20 36 32 17
Internal Link Dist(ft) 639 484 300 Internal Link Dist(ft) 639 484 300
Turn Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145 Turn Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145
Base Capacity(vph) 730 688 709 900 2433 3496 1135 Base Capacity(vph) 730 690 709 787 2260 3247 1049
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8pillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0,02 0,02 0J3 0.06 0,06 0,13 Reduced We,Ratio 0.04 0,04 0,04 0.10 0,09 0.09 010
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2024 Total AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2024 Total PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
Lane Configurations W r I tt Lane Configurations 4a r ttf tf
Traffic Volume(uph) 77 0; 50 154 23 131 48 Traffic Volume(vph) 138 ( 0 104 98 45 177 89
Future Volume(vph) 77 0 50 154 23 131 48 Future Volume(vph) 138 0 104 98 45 177 89
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm, pm+pt NA Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 3, 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 &0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0
Minimum Split(s) 44.9 44.9 44.9 31.6 31.6 10,6 31.6 Minimum Split(s) 44.9 44,9 44.9 31,6 31.6 10.6 31.6
Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0
Total';Split(%) 50blk 50.0% 50b% 37.8% 37.8%' 12.2% 37A% Total Split({a) SON 0,0% 50.0% 37.8% 37.8% 12.21% 37,8%
Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
Ali-Red Time(s) 2,0 2.0, 20 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Ail-Red Time(s) 2.0 ! 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 i
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Timets)' 5,9 5.9' 5,9 5.6 5,6 5$ 5.6 Total Lost Time(a) 5,9 5.9 5,9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5,6
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90
Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1.NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green Master Intersection
Natural Cycle:90 Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4
2024 Total AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2024 Total PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silve,ray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations 41 Lane Configurations 40
Traffic Volume(vph) 77 Oi 50 0 0 0 0 154 23 131 48 0 Traffic Volume(vph) 138 0 104 0 0 0 0 98 45 177 89 0
Future Volume(vph) 77 0 50 0 0 0 0 154 23 131 48 0 Future Volume(vph) 138 0 104 0 0 0 0 98 45 177 89 0
Ideal iPlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow(Vhpl) 1900 i 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Igoo 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5.9 5,9 H 5.6 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5,9 H 5.6 5,6 5.6
Lane Ulff.Factor (195 0.91 i 0195 OM 10 1100 0.95 Lane U91.Factor 0.95 021 0.95 0,91 1.00 'LOO 0,95
Frt 1.00 0.96 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Fit Protected 0.95 0,96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 0:97 1.00 1.00 1Z 0,95 i1.00
Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1571 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539 Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1557 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539
Fft Permitted 005 0.96 '1,00 1,00 1,00 0,63 10 Fit Permitted 0.05 ON 1,00 1�00 1,00 0.68 1,00
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1571 1504 5085 1583 1179 3539 Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1557 1504 5085 1583 1259 3539
Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.80 0,80 0,80 0,25 0.25 0,25 0.80 0,85 0,80 0,85 0,80 0,80 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0,85 0.80 OAS 0,26 0.25 025 0.80 0,85 HO 0,85 0,85 080
Adj.Flow(vph) 96 0 62 0 0 0 0 181 29 154 60 0 Adj.Flow(vph) 162 0 122 0 0 0 0 115 56 208 105 0
RTOR Reduction(vah) 0 50 46 0 0 a a 0 9 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 85 79 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow(vph) 56 4 4 0 0 0 0 181 20 154 60 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 99 11 10 0 0 0 0 115 36 208 105 0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 60.7 60.7 66.1 60.7 Actuated Green,G(s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 57.5 57.5 62.9 57.5
Effective Green,g(s) H 6,8 6,8 601 60.7 66,1 601 Effective Green,g(a) I(LO r 10,0 10,0 67.5 57.5 62,9 57,5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.67 0.67 0.73 0.67 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.64 0.64 0.70 0.64
Clearance Time(s) 5,9 519 519 5A 5,6 5.6 5.6 Clearance Time(a) 51 5,9 6.9 5.6 5,6 5.6 5.6
Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 12 12 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 12 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 127 118 113 3429 1067 901 2386 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 186 173 167 3248 1011 910 2261
v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 C0.01 0.02 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 C0.01 0.03
v/s Ratio Perm c0,03 0.00 (YOO 0,01 cO,12 We Ratio Perm C0,06 0.01 0.01 0.02 co.15
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.17 0.03 v1c Ratio 0.53 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.23 0.05
Uniform Delay,dl i 39.8 3&6 38,6 4,9 0 17 0 Uniform Delay,nit 37,8 35.8 W8 6.0 &0 0 &0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39 0.50 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 0.50
Incremental Delay,d2 0.9 0.0f (LO 0.0 0.0 OA Ob Incremental Delay,Q 1.5 0.1 Oi 0A 01 0L6 00
Delay(s) 40.7 38,6 38.6 5.0 4,9 1.8 2A Delay(s) 39.3 359 35.8 6.0 6,1 2.8 3A
Level cf Service D D D A A A A Level of Service 0 D D A A A A
Approach Delay(s) 39.3 0.0 5.0 2.0 Approach Delay(s) 37.0 0.0 6.0 2.9
Approach LOS D A A A Approach LEIS D A A A
HCM 2000 Control Delay 132 HCM 2000 Level of Service 8 HCM 2000 Control Delay 16,2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.20 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.27
Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90.0 Sum of lost time(8) 171 Actuated Cycle Length(a) 90,0 surn of lost time(s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.8% ICU Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(rein) is Analysis Period(min) 15
c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6
2024 Total AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2024 Total PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
Lane Group Plow(vph) 56 54 49 181 29 154 60 Lane Group Plow(vph) 99 96 89 115 56 208 105
v!c Ratio 0,36 0 23 0.21 0.05 0 03 017 0.02 ft Ratio 0,53 0.37 0.35 0 04 US 0.23 US 1
Control Delay 44.8 4.2 3.1 5.4 0.0 1.5 2.8 Control Delay 47.7 11.5 10.4 6.5 0.5 2.3 3.3
Queue belay 0.0 0.0• 0.0 0.0 0.0r 0.0 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Ok 0.0 (L0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 44.8 4.2 3.1 5.4 0.0 1.5 2.8 Total Delay 47.7 11,5 10.4 6.5 0.5 4.3 3.3
Queue Length 50tt(ft) 32 0 0 11 0. 0 2 Queue Length 50th(ft) 57 0 0 7 0 9 4
Queue Length 95th(ft) 62 3 0 19 0 7 4 Queue Length 95th(ft) 97 32 31 15 1 17 10
Internal Link Dist(ft) 535' 222 484 Internal Link Dist(ft) 535 222 484
Turn Bay Length(ft) 130 130 115 Turn Bay Length(ft) 130 130 115
Base;Capacity(vph) 730 738' 709 3496 1120 916 2433 Base Capacity(vph) 730 731 709 3247 1048 910 2260
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spiilback Gap Reductn 0 0' 0 0 0',, 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vtc Ratio` 0.08 0.07# 0.07 tf 05 0,03, 0.17 0.02 Reduced vfc Ratio 0.14 013 0.13 ON 0.05 0.23 US
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5
2024 Total AM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access 2024 Total PM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 1.8 Int Delay,s/veh 2
Lane Configurations tt r 1 0 Lane Configurations tt If ) 0
Traffic Vol,vehlb 3 2 9 2 1 29 0 163 8 22 65 3 Trafflo Vol,veNtl 5 U 1 4 0 33 1 118 8 36 143 9
Future Vol,veh/h 3 2 0 2 1 29 0 163 8 22 65 3 Future Vol,veh1h 5 0 1 4 0 33 1 118 8 36 143 9
Conflicting Peds,Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Parts,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized None None . - Nonei None RT Channelized None, None . None - None
Storage Length 50 - 50 50 - Storage Length 50 50 50
Veh In Median Storage,# a 0 - a - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 ID - . -
Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 - - 0 -
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 90 80 80 80 Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 80 85 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 3 0 s 3 1 36 0 192 10 28 81 4 Mvmt Flow 6 0 1 5 0 41 1 139 10 45 168 11
Conflicting Flow All 236 341 43 290 333 96 85 0 0 202 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 336 415 90 315 410 70 179 0 0 149 0 0
Stage 1 139 139 192 192 stage;1 264 264 - 141 i141
Stage 2 97 202 - 98 141 Stage 2 72 151 - 174 269
Critical Hdwy 7,54 5.54 04 754 6,54 &94 414 4,14 Critical Hdwy 7,54 6,54 6,94 754 6.54 6,94 4,14 4,14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6,54 6.54 . 6.64 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.64 5.54 - fL54 5.54
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 2,22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3,32 2.22 2,22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 722 592 1050 r661 699 942 1531 1367 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 686 583*1038 711 irr587 978 i1481 1430
Stage 1 873 795 - 791 740 - - - Stage 1 807 743 - 847 779 - - -
Stage 2 899 3 - 922 793 Stage 2 929 771 915 739
Platoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 t Platoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 683 581 1050 648 587 942 1531 1367 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 641 564*1038 693 568 978 1481 1430
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 683 581 - 648 587 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 641 564 - 693 568 - - -
Stage 1 873 779 791 740 Stage,''1 806 720 846 778
Stage 2 863 733 901 777 Stage 2 889 770 885 716
HCM Control Delay,a 10,7 9.2 0 1.9 HCM Control Delay,a 10.3 9 01 1.5
HCM LOS B A HCM LOS B A
Capacity(-hlh) 1531 638 899 1367 Capacity(vah1h) 1481 685 936 1430
HCM Lane VIC Ratio - 0.01 0.044 0.02 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.011 0.049 0.031
HCM Control Delay(a) 0 101 91 7,7 HCM Control Delay(a) 7.4 10.3 9 7.6
HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM Lane LOS A B A A
HCM 95th%ble Q veh) 0 0 01 011 HCM 95th'Ute O(veh) y 0 0 02 0.9
Volume exceeds capacity $.,Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined All major volume In platoon
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 8 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 8
2024 Total AM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd 2024 Total PM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 5.7 Int Delay,s/veh 4.8
Lane Configurations Y 0 tt Lane Configurations Y til I tt
Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 117 54 3 45 23 Traffic Vol,vehih 2 69 i 58 5 98 61
Future Vol,veh/h 2 117 54 3 45 23 Future Vol,veh/h 2 69 58 5 98 51
Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Pleds,#Jhr 0 0 i a 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Channelized - None None - None FIT Channel zed - None None . None
Storage Length 0 - 50 - Storage Length 0 50 -
Veh in Median Storage,9 0 0 - 0 Van In Median Storage,ft 0 0 0
-
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0
Peaki Hour Factor 80 85 80 80 go 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 85 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 138 68 4 56 29 Mvrnt Flow 3 86 73 6 115 64
Conflicting Flow All 197 36 0 0 72 0 Conflicting Flow All 338 40 0 0 79 0
Stage 1 70 stage I 76 - - - - -
Stage 2 127 Stage 2 262 -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 414 Critical Hdwy 6,84 &94 4.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5,84 -
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 773 1029 1526 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 649 1022 1517
Stage 1 945 - - Stage 1 938 - -
Stage 2 885 - - Stage,2 774 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,% 1
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 744 1029 4526 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 600 1022 1517
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 743 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 626 - -
Stage 1 945 Stage;/ 938
Stage 2 852 Stage 2 715
HCM Control Delay,a 9A 0 4,9 HCM Control Delay,a 8.9 0 4,9
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh1h) 1022 1526 Capacity{vehlh) - 1004 1517
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.137 0.037 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.088 0.076
HCM Control Delay(s) 9.1 7A HCM Control Delay(s) 8.9 7�6
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th-kille O(veh) 0,5 01 HCM 95th%Wle 0(veh) 0.3 0,2
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 9 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 9
2024 Total AM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access 2024 Total PM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Iyf,
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Int Delay,s/veh 0.3
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol,veh/h 6 42 118 1 3 1 Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 112 61 0 1 3
Future Vol,veh/h 6 42 118 1 3 1 Future Vol,vehlh 2 112 61 0 1 3
Conflicting Reds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Chaintiolizod Now Norio - None FIT Charinelized None None - Norio
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage, 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,If 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 85 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 85 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 8 53 139 1 4 1 Mvmt Flow 3 132 76 0 1 4
Conflicting Flow All 140 0 - 0 209 140 Conflicting Flow All 76 0 - 0 214 76
Stage I - 140 - stage I - 76
Stage 2 - 69 - Stage 2 - 138 -
Critical Hdwy 412 6,42 622 Critical Hdwy 412 642 6,22
Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg I - 5.42 -
Critkal Hdwy Stg 2 . 5,42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1443 779 908 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1523 774 985
Stage 1 - 887 - Stage I - 947 -
Stage 2 954 - Stage;2 - 889 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1443 774 <908 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1523 772 985
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 774 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 772 -
Stage 1 882 Stage 1 945
Stage 2 - 954 Stage 2 889
HCM Control Delay,a 0.9 0 9.5 HCM Controf Delay,a 0A 0 8.9
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(vshlh) 1443 804 Capacity(vah1h) 1523 921
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.006 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.005
ROM Control Delay(s) 7.5 0 9's HCM Control Delay(a) 7.4 0 8'9
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th Ule Q(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th I/Wile 0(veh) 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 10 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 10
2024 Total AM 9:Chevron Access&Access A 2024 Total PM 9:Chevron Access&Access A
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM(3th TNSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TNSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 1.6 Int Delay,s/veh 1.7
ONW140111*10111)=11
Lane Configurations 4 TO Y Lane Configurations Y
Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 30 7 0 0 7 Traffic Vol,veh/h 7 37 2 0 0 4
Future Vol,veh/h 2 30 7 0 0 7 Future Vol,veh/h 7 37 2 0 0 4
Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
PIT Channelized None None - None PIT Channel zed None None - None
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Voh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 a 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 38 9 0 0 9 Mvmt Flow 9 46 3 0 0 6
Conflicting Flow All 9 0 - 0 53 9 Conflicting Flow All 3 0 - 0 67 3
Stage 1 - 9 - stage,1 3
Stage 2 - 44 - Stage 2 - 64 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 622 Critical Hdwy 4.12 6,42 622
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
C 0cal Hdwy Stg 2 - 5,42 ' Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1611 955 1073 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 938 1081
Stage 1 - 1014 - Stage I - 1020 -
Stage 2 978 Stage;'2 959 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1611 953 1073 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 932 1081
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 953 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 932 -
Stage 1 1012 Stager I 10f4
Stage 2 - 978 Stage 2 - 959
HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 0 8.4 HCM Control Delay,a 1.2 0 83
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
capacity(veh(h) 1611 1073 Capacity,(v,,h/h) 1619 1081
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.008 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.005
HCM Control Delay(a) 7,2 0 8.4 ROM Control Delay(a) 71 Q 83
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th%Ifle Q(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 11 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 11
2024 Total AM 10:Access B&Resort Blvd 2024 Total PM 10:Access B&Resort Blvd
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 4.7 Int Delay,s/veh 2.9
Lane Configurations *4 40 4# Lane Configurations *T# *T* 40 *14
Traffic VOL ven/b, 3 18 20 0 41 0 65 0 0 0 0 12 Traffic Vol,vohlh 11 39 62 0 17 0 W 0 0 0 0 7
Future Vol,veh/h 3 18 20 0 41 0 65 0 0 0 0 12 Future Vol,veh/h 11 39 62 0 17 0 37 0 0 0 0 7
Conflicting Pods,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
PIT Channolized None Norio None None FIT Chatrinelizod None None None None
Storage Length Storage Length
Von in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Von In Median Storage,#1 0 0 0 i 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - 0 -
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 23 25 0 51 0 81 0 0 0 0 15 Mvmt Flow 14 49 78 0 21 0 46 0 0 0 0 9
Conflicting Flow All 51 0 0 48 0 0 103 95 36 95 107 51 Conflicting Flow All 21 0 0 127 0 0 142 137 88 137 176 21
Stage I - 44 44 - 51 51 - Staged 116 116 21 21
Stage 2 - 59 51 - 44 56 - Stage 2 26 21 116 155 -
Critical Hdwy 4,12 02 T12 652 622 7,12 6,52 6,22 Critical Hdwy 412 412 7,12 652 6,22 7,12 6,52 6,22
Critical Hdwy Stg I - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2i 612 5.52 -I 6,12 5.52 . Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5,52 . 6A2 5.52 .
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 2,218 3,518 4.018 3,318 3,518 4,018 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 2,218 3,518 4.018 3,318 3,518 4,018 3,318
Pot Capi-1 Maneuver 1565 1559 877 795 1037 888 783 1017 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1595 1459 828 754 970 834 717 1056
Stage 1 - - 970 858 - 962 852 Stage I - - 889 800 - 998 878 -
Stage 2 - - 953 852 - 970 848 stage 2 - 992 878 - 889 769
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1655 1559 862 793 1037 886 781 1017 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1595 1459 i 815 746 970 827i 710 1056
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 862 793 - 886 781 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 815 746 - 827 710 -
Stage 1 967 855 959 862 stage 1 880 792 988 878
Stage 2 - 939 852 967 845 Stage 2 - 984 878 880 761
HCM Control Delary,s 0,5 a 9.6 8,6 HCM Control Delay,a U 0 91 8A
HCM LOS A A HCM LOS A A
Capacity(voh/h) 862 1555 1559 1017 Capacity(veh1h) 815 1595 - 1459 1056
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.094 0.002 - 0.015 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0.009 - - 0.008
HCM Control Delay(s) 9,6 73 0 0 8,15 HCM Control Delay(a) 9.7 7.3 0 0 8,4
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A A A
HCM 95th%tile 0(veh) 03 0 0 0 HCM 95th!Stile O(veh) 02 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 12 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 12
2024 Total AM 11:Resort Blvd&Access C 2024 Total PM 11:Resort Blvd&Access C
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.8 Int Delay,s/veh 1.1
10"
Lane Configurations Y Lane Configurations 4 T# Y
Traffic Vol,vehilln 1 17 36 0 0 5 Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 34 14 0 0 3
Future Vol,veh/h 1 17 36 0 0 5 Future Vol,veh/h 5 34 14 0 0 3
Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 i 0 0 i 0 0 0 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
PIT Channelized None None . None PIT Charinelized None None . None
Storage Length 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# G 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 so go 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 21 45 0 0 6 Mvmt Flow> 6 43 18 0 0 4
Conflicting Flow All 45 0 - 0 68 45 Conflicting Flow All 18 0 - 0 73 18
Stage I - 45 - stage I - - 18 -
Stage 2 - 23 - Stage 2 - 55 -
Critical Hdwy 4,12 6,42 6,22 Critical Hdwy 4.12 6,42 6,22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6,42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.42
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1563 937 41025 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1599 931 1061
Stage 1 - 977 - Stage 1 - 1005 -
Stage 2 - 1000 Stage 2 - 968
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1563 936 1025 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1599 927 1061
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 936 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 927 -
Stage 1 976 Stage 1 1001
Stage 2 - 1000 Stage 2 - 968
HCM Control Delay,a 04 0 8.5 HCM Control Delay,a 0,9 0 8A
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh1h) 1563 1025 Capacity(velvh) 1599 - 1061
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.006 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.004
HCM Control Delay(a) 73 0 8,5 HCM Control Delay(s) 1.3 0 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th%tile,Q(veh) a 0 HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 13 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 13
2024 Total AM 12:Resort Blvd&Access D 2024 Total PM 12:Resort Blvd&Access D
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 Int Delay,s/veh 0.8
Lane Configurationsr Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol,vehih 1 16 32 0 0 3 Traffic Vol,vahth 3 31 f 12 0 0 2
Future Vol,veh/h 1 16 32 0 0 3 Future Vol,veh/h 3 31 12 0 0 2
Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 a 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Chandelized Nom None . None RT Channel zed None None . None
Storage Length 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,If 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 so 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 20 40 0 0 4 Mvmt Flow 4 39 15 0 0 3
Conflicting Flow All 40 0 - 0 62 40 Conflicting Flow All 15 0 - 0 62 15
Stage 1 40 - Stage 1 15
Stage 2 - 22 - Stage 2 47
Critical Hdwy 4,12 6.42 6,22 Critical Hdwy 4.12 6,42 6,22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 . 5.42 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 &42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 944 1031 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 944 1065
Stage I - 982 - Stage I - 1008 -
Stage 2 - 1001 - Stage,2 - 975 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1570 943 i1031 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 941 1065
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 943 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 941 -
Stage 1 981 Stage 1 1005
Stage 2 - 1001 Stage 2 - 975
HCM'Control Delay,a 04 0 8,6 HCM Control Delay,a 0,6 0 &4
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(v,,hlh) 1570 - 1031 Capacity(vah/h) 1603 - 1065
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.004 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.002 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.3 a 85 HCM Control Delay(s) ## 7,3 0 8A
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 96th 9/611le Q(Yeh) 0 0 HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 14 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 14
2024 Total AM 13:Resort Blvd&Access E 2024 Total PM 13:Resort Blvd&Access E
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 Int Delay,s/veh 0.9
13,
Lane Configurations Y Lane Configurations 4 T4 Y
Traffic Vol,veh1h 1 15 29 0 0 3 Traffic Vol,veh/h 3 28 10 0 0 2
Future Vol,veh/h 1 15 29 0 0 3 Future Vol,veh/h 3 28 10 0 0 2
Conflicting Reds,Whr 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 Conflicting Peds,Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Chantrelized Now None - None FIT Charinelized None None . None
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,If 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 60 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 19 36 0 0 4 Mvmt Flow 4 35 13 0 0 3
Conflicting Flow All 36 0 - 0 57 36 Conflicting Flow All 13 0 - 0 56 13
stage 1 36 - Stage;1 - 13
Stage 2 21 - Stage 2 - 43 -
Crifloat Hdwy 4,12 6.42 622 Critical Hdwy 4,12 6A2 622
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig I - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - 5.42 ' Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1575 950 1037 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 952 1067
Stage 1 - 986 Stage 1 - 1010 -
Stage 2 1002 - Stage;2 979 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1575 949 1037 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1606 949 1067
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 949 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 949 -
Stage 1 985 stage 1 1007
Stage 2 - 1002 Stage 2 - 979
HCM Control Delay,a 0,5 a 8.5 HCM Control Delay,a 0.7 0 8.4
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(vlh/h) 1575 1037 capacity("h/h) 1606 1067
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.004 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay(a) 7.3 0 8,5 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.2 0 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th 9/611le O(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th%file 0(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 15 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 15
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX K
2027 BUILD PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
,C4'0'--E—E, C i v T e c h
2027 Total AM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy 2027 Total PM 1:Goldfield Rd/EB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.2 Int Delay,s/veh 2.3
Lane Configurations tt Lane Configurations tt
Traffic Vol,v,-h/h 64 0 0 0 0 131 Traffic Vol,vehlb 67 0 0 0 r 0 227
Future Vol,veh/h 64 0 0 0 0 131 Future Vol,veh/h 67 0 0 0 0 227
Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,41hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Channelized - None None - None FIT Channelized - Now None - None
Storage Length 0 195 - Storage Length 0 195 -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Von In Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0
Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 25 25 80 85 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 25 25 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 80 0 0 0 0 164 Mvmt Flow 84 0 0 0 0 267
Conflicting Flow All 77 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 134 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 stage;1 0
Stage 2 77 Stage 2 134
CritleaJ Hdwy 6.84 414 Critical Hdwy 644 4,14
Critical Hdwy Stg I - Critical Hdwy Stg I -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.84
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 - 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 917 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 846 0
Stage 1 - 0 Stage I - 0
Stage 2 937 0 Stage 2 878 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 917 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 946
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 917 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 846
Stage I Stage:1 -Stage 2 937 Stage 2 878
HCM Control Delay,s 9.3 0 HCM Control Dalays U G
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(v,-hlh) 917 Capachy(vetvh) 846
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099
HCM Control Delay(a) 9.3 0 HCM Control Delay(a) 9.7 0
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th lkfile Q(veh) 03 HCM 95th lkfile O(Yeh) 0.3
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2027 Total AM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy 2027 Total PM 2:Goldfield Rd&WB Old West Hwy
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 2.9 Int Delay,s/veh 2.9
Lane Configurations r tt f Lane Configurations +t
Traffic Vol,WWII 0 18 f), 0 64 10 0 224 46 0 0 0 TraffloVol,veh/h 0 21 0 0 67 6 0 205 64 0 0 0
Future Vol,veh/h 0 18 0 0 64 10 0 224 46 0 0 0 Future Vol,veh/h 0 21 0 0 67 6 0 205 64 0 0 0
Conflicting Parts,#1hr 0 0 a 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
PIT Cheirinelized None Stop Yield Norte FIT Channelized Norte Stop Yield None
Storage Length 0 0 Storage Length 0 0
Veh in Median Storage,# a 0 1 a 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 - 0 - 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0 - 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80f 25 25 25 Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 So 85 80 25 25 25
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 23 0 0 80 13 0 264 58 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 26 0 0 84 8 0 241 80 0 0 0
Conflicting Flow All - 264 - - 264 132 - 0 0 Conflicting Flow All - 241 - - 241 121 - 0 0
Stage 1 0 264 - Stage;1 0 241
Stage 2 264 0 - Stage 2 241 0 -
Critical Hdwy 6.54 6,54 6.94 Critical Hdwy 6,54 6,54 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.54 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.54 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.64 -Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 4.02 3.32 Follow-up Hdwy 4.02 4.02 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 640 0 0 640 893 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 659 0 0 669 908 0
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 689 - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0 705 - 0
Stage 2 0 689 0 0 0 Stage!2 0 705 0 0 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 640 640 B93 - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 659 - - 659 908
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 640 640 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 659 659 -
Stage 1 689 Stage 1 706
Stage 2 689 - Stage 2 705 -
HCM Control Delay,s 10,8 111 0 HCM Control Delay,a 10.7 11"t 0
HCM LOS B B HCM LOS B B
Capacity(v,,h/h) 640 640 893 Capacity(vehlh) 659 659 908
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 0.125 0.014 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.127 0.008
HCM Controf Delay(s) 10.8 il,4 9A HCM Control Delay(s) 101 %3 9
HCM Lane LOS B B A HCM Lane LOS B B A
HCM 95th I/otfle Q(veh) 01 0.4 0 HCM 95th I/offe O(veh) 0,11 GA 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2027 Total AM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01cl West Hwy Exit 2027 Total PM 3:Goldfield Rd&US-60/01cl West Hwy Exit
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 3.7 Int Delay,s/veh 2
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations r tt tt
Traffic Vol,veh1h 0 179 91 0 0 195 Traffic Vol,veWh 0 121 147 0 0 293
Future Vol,veh/h 0 179 91 0 0 195 Future Vol,veh/h 0 121 147 0 0 293
Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
PIT Channelized None None None PIT Channel zed Non-, None None
Storage Length 0 Storage Length - 0 -
Van in Median Storage,# 0 a 0 Veh,in median Storage,#4 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 85 85 80 80 85 Peak Hour Factor 80 85 85 80 80 85
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Ftow 0 211 107 0 0 229 Mvmt Flow 0 142 I173 0 0 346
Conflicting Flow All - 54 0 - - - Conflicting Flow All - 87 0 - - -
Stage i stage 1
Stage 2 Stage 2
Critical Hdwy 6,94 Critical Hdwy 6,94
Critical Hdwy Stg I - Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Critical Hdwy Sig 2
Follow-up Hdwy 3.32 Follow-up Hdwy - 3,32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 1002 0 0 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 954 0 0
Stage 1 0 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 0
Stage 2 0 0 0 Stage!2 0 0 0
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 554 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -
Stage 1 Stage 1
Stage 2 Stage 2
HCM Control Delay,a 9Z 0 0 HCM Control Delay,a 9.4 0 0
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Cape*(vah/h) 1002 Capacity(vehlh) 954
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.21 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149
HCM Control Delay(a) 9,5 HCM Control Delay(s) 54
HCM Lane LOS A HCM Lane LOS A
HCM 96th 1%fle O(veh) U HCM 95th%4ile Q(veh) 015
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2027 Total AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2027 Total PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations 4+ ++
Traffic Volume(vph) 9 0 18 100 140 179 133 Traffic Volume(vph) 26 0 42 66 186 250 95
Future Volume(vph) 9 0 18 100 140 179 133 Future Volume(vph) 26 0 42 66 186 250 95
Tom Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 2 1 1 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 H 8,0 H 20,0 20.0 20,0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 U 8,0 H 20,0 20.0 20,0
Minimum Split(a) 40 44.9 44,9 10,6 31A 31,6 31.6 Minimum Split(a) 44,9 40 40 10.6 31,6 31,6 31,6
Total Split(s) 45+0 45.0 45+0 11+0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45+0 45.0 45.0 11+0 34+0 34.0 34.0
Total Split(%) KiM6 50.0% 50.0% 112% 373% 3T8% 37 8% Total Split(IN 50.0% 50,01k 50.0% 122% 37.8% US% 37,8%
Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16 Yellow Time(s) 19 19 19 16 16 16 16
All-Red Time(a) 2,0 2,0 ZO 2.0 2,Of 2,0 2,0 All-Red Titne(s) 10 U 2.0 ZO 2,0 2,0 10
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5,9 5,9 5,9 5.6 5,6 5,6 5,6 Total Lost Time(a) 6,9 519 &9 5.6 5,6 5,6 5,6
Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead
Laad-Lag Optimize? Yes Yesi Yes yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None Max C-Max C-Max C-Max
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Length.,90 Actuated Cycle Length:90
Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset:0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection
Natural Cycle-90 Natural cycle-90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps Splits and Phases: 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60WB Ramps
5 1#4 #5 4 #5 144 95 #4 #5
4,03 'A*
NO 02
�4 3
An
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 1
2027 Total AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps 2027 Total PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations 1 4.11 It tt ttf r Lane Configurations 41� r tt ttf r
Traffic Volume(vph) 0 Or 0 9 0 18 100 140 0 0 179 133 Traffic Volume(vph) 0 0 0 26 0 42 136 186 0 0 250 95
Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 9 0 18 100 140 0 0 179 133 Future Volume(vph) 0 0 0 26 0 42 66 186 0 0 250 95
Ideal Flow(vphpI) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Iwo 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5,6 H 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5,9 5.9 5.6 H 5,6 5.6
Lane Lffil.Factor 0195 0.91 0196 1100 0.95 021 1.00 Lem Uli Factor 0195 0.91 0195 1.00 0.95 i 0.91 1.00
Fri 1.00 0.86 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fri 1.00 0.87 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 0,95 1,00 1,00 0195 1Z 1Z 1,00 Fit Protected 0.95 0199 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1456 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583 Said,Flow(prof) 1681 1460 1504 1770 3539 5085 1583
Fit Permitted 0,95 1,00i 1.00 O.61 1.00 1Z 1,00 Fit Permitted 0,95 0,99 1,00 0,56 1,00 1.00 1100
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1456 1504 1144 3539 5085 1583 Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1460 1504 1052 3539 5085 1583
Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.25 0,25 0,25 0,80 0.80 1180 0,65 0,85 0.80 030 0,85 0.85 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0,25 i 0.25 0.25 0,80 0,80 0,80 0.80 0,85 HO 0.80 tL85 0,85
Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 11 0 22 118 165 0 0 211 156 Adj.Flow(vph) 0 0 0 32 0 52 82 219 0 0 294 112
RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 50 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 41
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 10 1 1 118 165 0 0 211 106 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 30 3 3 83 219 0 0 294 71
Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 3 2 1 1 Protected Phases 3 2 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 66.3 60.9 60.9 60+9 Actuated Green,G(s) 10.1 10.1 10.1 62.8 57.4 57.4 57.4
Effective Green,g(s) 6,6 6,16 6.6 66,3 60.9 60A 60.9 Effective Green,g(s) 10A 101 10,1 62.8 67A 57A 57A
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.74 0.68 0.68 0.68 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.70 0.64 0.64 0.64
Clearance Time(s) 5,9 5.9 5,9 5,6 &6 5.6 5.6 Clearance Time(a) 5,9 5.9 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5,6
Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 123 106 110 880 2394 3440 1074 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 188 163 166 777 2257 3243 1009
v/s Ratio Prot C0.01 0.05 0.04 v/s Ratio Prot C0.01 0.06 0.06
via Ratio Perm 00,01 0.00 0L00 '0.09 0,07 via Ratio Perm c0.02 0.00 0,00 c0u07 0.05
v1c Ratio 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.07 0.06 0.10 v1c Ratio 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.07
Uniform Delay,di 38,9 38.7 381 15 0 4,9 &D Uniform Delay,di 36A 35,5 35.5 4,5 &3 6,3 62
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.63 1.00 1.00 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.63 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay,d2 0.1 0.0 0,0 03 01 0.0 0,2 Incremental DeW,d2 (LI 0,0 0.0 03 O'l 0.1 0J
Delay(s) 39.0 383 38,7 1.9 3.1 4.9 5,2 Delay(s) 36.3 35,6 35,6 15 41 6,3 6,3
Level of Service D D D A A A A Level of Service 0 D D A A A A
Approach Delay(s) 0+0 38+8 2.6 5.1 Approach Delay(s) 0+0 35+8 3.9 6.3
Approach LOS A 0 A A Approach LOS A D A A
HCM 2000 Control Delay 5,7 HCM 20W Level of Service A HCM 2000 Control Delay H HCM 2000 Level of Service A
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.13 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.11
Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90,0 Sum Of lost time(s) 17A Actuated Cycle Length ts) 90,0 Sum of lost time(s) ITI
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45+1% ICU Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) is Analysis Period(min) is
c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 3
2027 Total AM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 W13 Ramps 2027 Total PM 4:Goldfield Rd&US-60 WB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
Lane Group Flow(vph) 10 12 12 118 165 211 156 Lane Group Flow(vph) 30 28 28 83 219 294 112
Wc Ratio ON 0.05 0,05 0,13 0,071 0.06 0,14 Wc Ratio 0,16 0,11 011 0,11 0.10 0,09 011
Control Delay 38.1 0.5 0.4 1.5 3.4 5.3 1.3 Control Delay 36.8 0.9 0.9 2.8 4.4 6.7 1.8
Queue Delay 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (LO 0,0 Queue Delay Ob U 0,0 0.0 (LO H 0.0
Total Delay 38.1 0,5 0.4 1,5 3.4 5.3 13 Total Delay 36,8 0,9 0.9 2,8 4.4 6.7 1,8
Queue Length 50th(A) 5 0 0 3 7 13 0 Queue Length,50th(ft) 16 0 0 3 10 20 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 18 0 0 5 12 21 16 Queue Length 95th(ft) 36 0 0 21 38 34 17
Internal Link Dist(ft) M 484 300 Internal Link Dist(ft) 639 484 300
Turn Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145 Turn Bay Length(ft) 190 190 145
Base Capacity(vph) 730 688 709 894 2439 3505 1139 Base Capacity(vph) 730 690 709 776 2257 3242 1050
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Roductri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Wr Ratioi 0.01 0.02 0.02 013 0.07 0,06 0,14 Reduced v/c Ratio 0,04 0,04 0,04 0L11 0.10 0,09 0,11
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 2
2027 Total AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2027 Total PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Timings
Lane Configurations r W r I tt Lane Configurations 4a r ttf tf
Traffic Volume(uph) 81 0; 52 158 24 136 51 Traffic Volume(vph) 144 ` 0 106 101 47 186 93
Future Volume(vph) 81 0 52 158 24 136 51 Future Volume(vph) 144 0 106 101 47 186 93
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Permitted Phases! 3 3 1; 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 Detector Phase 3 3 3 1 1 2 1
Switch Phase Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 Minimum Initial(s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 20.0
Minimum Split{a); 40 44.9 44.9 31.6 31,6' 10.6 31.6 Minimum Split(a) 442 r 49 44,9 31.6 31,6 10.6 31.6
Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0 Total Split(s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 34.0 34.0 11.0 34.0
Total Split(%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 37,81/4 37.81% 1120% 37,81% Total Split(%) 50.01% 50.01/4 50.0% 37,8% 37.8% 12,21% 37.8%
Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Yellow Time(s) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time(s) { 2.0 2.0' 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 All-Red Time(a) 2A 10 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time(a) 5.9 5.9' 5,9 5.6 5,6` 5.6 5,6 Total Lost Time(a) 5,9 5.9 5,9 5.6 5,6 5,6 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes' Yes Yes Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max Recall Mode None None None C-Max C-Max Max C-Max
. ..r v,} ~•a14� .,�r���§4 �2)a` � `i"� q' -'"1 '��_�=t �,��.,� �r �#if7 • �a it��u pt�'�t P S �'�;j � 1 � ( � a �' ,i �,4..
Cycle Length:90 Cycle Length:90
Actuated Cycle Length:90 Actuated Cycle Length:90
Offset 0(0%),Referenced to phase 1.NBSB,Start of Green,Master Intersection Offset 0(0%),Referenced to phase 1:NBSB,Start of Green Master Intersection
Natural Cycle:90; Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated Control Type:Actuated-Coordinated
Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps Splits and Phases: 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 4
2027 Total AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2027 Total PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Lane Configurations 41 Lane Configurations 40
Traffic Volume(vph) 81 Oi 52 0 0 0 0 158 24 136 51 0 Traffic Volume(vph) 144 0 106 0 0 0 0 101 47 186 93 0
Future Volume(vph) 81 0 52 0 0 0 0 158 24 136 51 0 Future Volume(vph) 144 0 106 0 0 0 0 101 47 186 93 0
Ideal iPlow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow(Vhpl) 1900 j 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5.9 5,9 H 5.6 5,6 5.6 Total Lost time(s) 5,9 5.9 5,9 H 5.6 5,6 5.6
Lane U10.Factor 9.95 0.911 0,95 0,91 1100 1100 0.95 Lane U91,Factor 0,95 0191 0,95 0L91 1:00 1.00 0.95
Frt 1.00 0.94 0.85 100 0.85 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00
Fft Protected 0.95 0197 1.00 1,00 1,00 0.95 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00
Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1551 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539 Said.Flow(prof) 1681 1560 1504 5085 1583 1770 3539
Fit Permitted 0,95 0,97 1,00 1.00 1,00 0,63 1.00 Fit Permitted 0.95 0,97 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.67 1.00
Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1551 1504 5085 1583 1173 3539 Said.Flow(perm) 1681 1560 1504 5085 1583 1254 3539
Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.85 0,80 0.87 025 0.25 0,25 0,80 0,85 0,80 0.85 0,80 0,80 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0,85 0.80 085 0,25 025 0,25 0,80 0L85 0.80 0L85 O.85 (50
Growth Factor(vph) 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Adj.Flow(vph) 169 0 125 0 0 0 0 119 59 219 109 0
Adj.Flow(vph) 76 0 60 0 0 0 0 186 30 160 64 0 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 88 82 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0
RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 42 40 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 101 13 10 0 0 0 0 119 38 219 109 0
Lane Group Flow(vph) 48 3 3 0 0 0 0 186 20 160 64 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 3 1 2 1
Protected Phases 3 1i 2 1 Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1
Permitted Phases 3 3 1 1 Actuated Green,G(s) 10.1 10.1 10.1 57.4 57.4 62.8 57.4
Actuated Green,G(s) 6.6 6.6 H 60.9 60.9 66,3 60,9 Effective Green,g(s) 101 101 10A 574 57A 62.8 57.4
Effective Green,g(s) H 6.6 6.6 60.9 60.9 66.3 60.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.64 0.64 0.70 0.64
Actuated 9/C Raflo 0,07 ON 0,07 0,68 068 0J4 0.68 Clearance,Time(a) 5,9 5.9 519 5.6 5,6 5.6 5.6
Clearance Time(s) 5.9 5.9 5,9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 Vehicle Extension(s) 1.2 12 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Vehicle Extension(s) 11 1.2 12 1,2 1,2 1,2 1.2 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 188 175 168 3243 1009 905 2257
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 123 113 110 3440 1071 899 2394 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 C0.01 0.03
v/s Ratio Prot 0,04 cO.01 0,02 v/s Ratio Perm cO,06 0.01 0M D,02 c(115
v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.24 0.05
ft Ratio 0,39 OD3 0L03 0.05 0,02 018 0.0 Uniform Delay,di NY 35,8 351 6,0 6.O U 6.1
Uniform Delay,dl 39.8 38.7 38.7 4.9 4.8 3.6 4.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.47 0.50
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0,40 0.50 Incremental Delay,d2 1.5 01 0"1 DO 01 0.6 DO
Incremental Delay,Q 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0A 0.0 Delay(s) 39.2 35,8 35.8 6.1 6,1 3.0 3.1
Delay(s) 40.5 38.8i 38,8 4,9 iLft 1,9 2.4 Level of Service D D D A A A A
Level of Service D D D A A A A Approach Delay(s) 37.0 0.0 6.1 3.0
Approach Way(a) 39A 0,0 4,9 2,0 Approach LOS 0 A A A
Approach LOS D A A A
HCM 2000 Control Delay 16,2 HCM 2000 Level of Servilbe B
HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.28
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,20 Actuated Cycle Length(9) 9010 Sum of lost fime(s) ITA
Actuated Cycle Length(s) 90.0 Sum of lost time(s) 17.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 451% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) is
Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group
c Crifical Lane Group
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 6
2027 Total AM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps 2027 Total PM 5:Goldfield Rd&US-60 EB Ramps
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Queues
Lane Group Plow(vph) 48 45 43 186 30 160 64 Lane Group Plow(vph) 101 101 92 119 59 219 109
We Ratio 031 019 0.19 0,05 0,03 017 U.03 ft Ratio 0,54 0.39 0,36 U4 0,06 0,24 0,06
Control Delay 43.9 1.9 1.8 5.3 0.0 1.5 2.8 Control Delay 47.8 12.4 10.9 6.6 0.6 2.4 3.4
Queue Delay 0,0 0<O OZ 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0,0 010 0,0 0,0 0,0
Total Delay 43.9 1,9 1.8 5,3 OA 1.5 2,8 Total Delay 47.8 12.4 10,9 6,6 0,6 2A 3A
Queue Length 50tt(ft) 27 0' 0 12 0f 0 2 Queue Length 50th(ft) 58 1 0 8 0 12 5
Queue Length 95th(ft) 58 0 0 19 0 4 4 Queue Length 95th(ft) 98 36 33 16 2 18 10
Internal Link Dist(it) 535 222 ;484 lutemal Link Dist(ft) 535 222 484
Turn Bay Length(it) 130 130 115 Turn Bay Length(it) 130 130 115
Base;Capacity(vph) 730 729, 709 3505 1123i 915 2439 Base Capacity(vph) 730 733 709 3242 1046 905 2257
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0', 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reducedv/eRatio 0,07 0,06 0.06 0.05 OM 0.17 0,03 Reduced*Ratio 0,14 0.14 0,13 ON 0,06 0,24 0,05
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 5
2027 Total AM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access 2027 Total PM 6:Goldfield Rd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
Int Delay,s/veh 1.8 Int Delay,s/veh 2.1
Lane Configurations tt r 1 0 Lane Configurations 4o 4* tf r ) 0
Traffic Vol,vehlb 3 2 9 2 1 30 0 167 9 23 68 3 Traffic Vol,veh/h 6 0 1 4 0 35 1 122 9 38 147 10
Future Vol,veh/h 3 2 0 2 1 30 0 167 9 23 68 3 Future Vol,veh/h 6 0 1 4 0 35 1 122 9 38 147 10
Conflicting Peds,Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Pods,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Chamiefized None None - None None RT Chonnelized None None . . None . . None
Storage Length 50 50 50 Storage Length 50 - 50 50 -
Van In Median Storage,# 0 0 a 0 Vah in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 0
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 85 80 80 85 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvrm Flow 4 3 0 3 1 38 0 196 11 29 85 4 Mvmt Flow 8 0 1 5 0 44 1 144 11 48 173 13
Conflicting Flow All 244 352 45 298 343 98 89 0 0 207 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 350 433 93 329 428 72 186 0 0 155 0 0
Stage 1 145 145 196 196 - - - stage 1 276 276 146 146
Stage 2 99 207 - 102 147 - - Stage 2 74 157 183 282
Critical Hdwy T54 6,54 6,94 7,54 651 I6,94 4,14 4,14 Critical Hdwy T54 6,54 &94 7.54 8Z4 6,94 4,14 4,14
Critical Hdwy Sig 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6,54 5,54 - 6,54 5$4 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 6,54 5,54 . 6,64 s5.54 - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 132 2.22 2,22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 132 2.22 2,22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 712 585 1047 652 591 939 1525 1361 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 670 569*1038 694 573 975 1473 1423
Stage 1 866 790 - 787 737 - - - Stage 1 794 734 - 842 775 - - -
Stage 2 896 729 . 917 788 Stage 2 927 767 . 903 730 - - -
Platoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 1 Platoon blocked,% 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mov Cap-I Maneuver 672 572 1047 639 579 939 1525 1361 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 623 550*1038 675 553 975 1473 1423
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 672 572 - 639 579 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 623 550 - 675 553 - - -
Stage 1 866 773 787 737 stage 1 793 709 841 774
Stage 2 859 729 895 771 Stage 2 885 766 872 705
HCM Control Delay,a 10,8 92 0 1.9 HCM Control Delay,s 10,5 9.1 01 U
HCM LOS B A HCM LOS B A
Capacity(veh1h) i 1525 628 897 1361 Capacity(vsh1h) 1473 661 932 1423
HCM Lane VIC Ratio - 0.01 0.046 0.021 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 0.013 0.052 0.033
HOM Central Delay Is) 0 10,8 9,2 7.7 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.4 10S ILI 7'6
HCM Lane LOS A B A A HCM Lane LOS A B A A
HCM 95th%tile,O(veh) 0 0 0A 011 HCM 95th"kille O(ven) 0 r 0 0.2 0.1
Volume exceeds capacity $:Delay exceeds 300a +:Computation Not Defined All major volume In platoon
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CivTech Inc.-CM Page 8 CivTech Inc.-CM Page 8
2027 Total AM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd 2027 Total PM 7:Goldfield Rd&Resort Blvd
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 5.7 Int Delay,s/veh 4.7
Lane Configurations Y 0 tt Lane Configurations Y tT4 tt
Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 119 57 3 46 24 Traffic Vol,vehlb 2 70 62 6 98 54
Future Vol,veh/h 2 119 57 3 46 24 Future Vol,veh/h 2 70 62 6 98 54
Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
FIT Channelized - None None - None FIT Channelized - None None y - None
Storage Length 0 50 - Storage Length 0 50 -
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh In Median Storage,# 10 0 - 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0
Peaki Hour Factor 80 85 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 85 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 140 71 4 58 30 Mvmt Flow 3 88 78 8 115 68
Conflicting Flow All 204 38 0 0 75 0 Conflicting Flow All 346 43 0 0 86 0
Stage 1 73 Staged 82
Stage 2 131 Stage 2 264
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 414 Critical Hdwy &84 6.94 414
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5,84
Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22 Follow-up Hdwy 3,52 3.32 2.22
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 766 1026 1522 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 641 1018 1508
Stage 1 941 - - Stage 1 932 - -
Stage 2 881 Stage';2 772
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,% 1
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 737 1026 1522 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 592 1018 1508
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 738 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 622 - -
Stage 1 941 Stage;1 932
Stage 2 848 Stage 2 713
HCM Control Delay,a 9A 0 4.9 HCM Control Delay,a 9 0 4.8
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh/h) 1019 1522 Capacity(voh/h) - 1000 1508
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.14 0.038 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.09 0.076
HCM Control Delay(s) 91 7,5 HCM Control Delay(a) 9 7.6
HCM Lane LOS A A HCM Lane LOS A A
HCM 95th%tite 0(veh) 0.5 0A HCM 95th'kille,O(veh) 0.3 01
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 9 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 9
2027 Total AM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access 2027 Total PM 8:Resort Blvd&Chevron Access
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TVVSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 Int Delay,s/veh 0.3
Lane Configurationsr Lane Configurations *7
Traft Vol,vehlh 7 42 120 1 3 1 Traffic Vol,veh/h 2 114 62 0 1 3
Future Vol,veh/h 7 42 120 1 3 1 Future Vol,vehlh 2 114 62 0 1 3
Conflicting Reds,Whr 0 0 0 a 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Channefized None None . None RT Channel zed None None - Norio
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 85 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 85 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 53 141 1 4 1 Mvmt Flow 3 134 78 0 1 4
Conflicting Flow All 142 0 - 0 213 142 Conflicting Flow All 78 0 - 0 218 78
Stage 1 - 142 stage 1 78 -
Stage 2 - 71 Stage 2 140 -
Criticail Hdwy 4,12 6,42 622 Critical Hdwy 4.12 6,42 622
Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy SIg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5,42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 i5,42 .
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1441 775 906 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1520 770 983
Stage I - 885 - Stage 1 - 945
Stage 2 952 Stage,2 887 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1441 770 i 906 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1520 768 983
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 770 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 768 -
Stage 1 880 Stage 1 943
Stage 2 - 952 Stage 2 - 887
HCM Control Delay,a 11 a 9.5 HCM Control Delay,a 0.1 0 8,9
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(voh1h) y 1441 800 Capacity(veh1h) 1520 919
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.006 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.002 0.005
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.5 0 a's ROM Control Delay(a) 7.4 0 U
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th-Wile O(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th%til 0(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchic 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 10 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 10
2027 Total AM 9:Chevron Access&Access A 2027 Total PM 9:Chevron Access&Access A
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
11 roll
Int Delay,s/veh 1.5 Int Delay,s/veh 1.6
N
Lane Configurations Y Lane Configurations Y
Traffic Vol,veh1h 2 32 $ 0 0 7 Traffic Vol,vehih 7 40 2 0 0 4
Future Vol,veh/h 2 32 8 0 0 7 Future Vol,veh/h 7 40 2 0 0 4
Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 a 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Charrinelized I None None - None FIT Charinelized None None . None
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 3 40 10 0 0 9 Mvmt Flow 9 so 3 0 0 5
Conflicting Flow All 10 0 - 0 56 10 Conflicting Flow All 3 0 - 0 71 3
Stage I - 10 stage 1 3 -
Stage 2 - 46 - Stage 2 - 68 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 622 Critical Hdwy 02 &42 6,22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg I - 5.42 -
Crifical Hdwy Sig 2 . 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 . 5.42
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
PotCap-IManeuver 1610 952 1071 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 933 1081
Stage 1 - 1013 - Stage I - 1020 -
Stage 2 976 - Stage 2 955 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1610 950 1071 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1619 927 1081
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 950 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 927 -
Stage 1 1011 Stage;1 1014
Stage 2 - 976 Stage 2 - 955
HCM Control Delay,a 04 0 8.4 HCM Control Delay,a 1.1 0 83
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh/h) 1610 1071 Capacity(veb/h) 1619 1081
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.008 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.005
HCM Control Delay(s) 7.2 0 8.4 HCM Control Delay(a) 7.2 0 83
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th 1/61IJe O(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th/We O(veht 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 11 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 11
2027 Total AM 10:Access B&Resort Blvd 2027 Total PM 10:Access B&Resort Blvd
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 4.6 Int Delay,s/veh 2.8
Lane Configurations Lane Configurations
Treffic Vol,veh1h 3 IS 20 0 43 0 65 0 0 0 0 12 Traffic:Vol,veh/h 11 41 62 0 18 0 37 0 0 0 0 7
Future Vol,veh/h 3 18 20 0 43 0 65 0 0 0 0 12 Future Vol,veh/h 11 41 62 0 18 0 37 0 0 0 0 7
Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
FIT Channolized None Norio None None FIT Channeltzed None None None None
Storage Length Storage Length
VehIn Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 - 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 0 -Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 23 25 0 64 0 81 a 0 0 0 15 Mvmt Flow 14 51 78 U 23 0 46 0 0 0 0 9
Conflicting Flow All 54 0 0 48 0 0 106 98 36 98 110 54 Conflicting Flow All 23 0 0 129 0 0 146 141 90 141 180 23
Stage 1 44 44 - 54 54 Stage 1 119 118 - 23 23
Stage 2 62 54 - 44 56 - Stage 2 28 23 - 118 157 -
Critical Hdwy 4,12 412 7.12 6,52 6.22t 712 s,52 612 Critical Hdwy 4,12 4,12 T12 652t 6.22 712 6,52 622
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6,12 5.52 . Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6,12 5.52 - 6.12 5,52 1
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 2,218 3,518 4.018 3,318 3,518 4,018 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 2,218 3,518 4.018 3,318 3,518 4,018 3,318
Pot 0ap-1 Maneuver 1551 1559 873 792 1037 884 780 1013 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1592 1457 823 750 968 829 714 1054
Stage 1 - - 970 858 - 958 850 - Stage I - - 887 798 - 995 876 -
Stage 2 949 850 - 970 848 stage 2 989 876 887 768 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1551 1559 858 790 1037 882 778 1013 Mov Gap-1 Maneuver 1592 1457 810 743 968 822 707 1054
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 858 790 - 882 778 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 810 743 - 822 707 -
stage 1 967 865 955 850 stage 1 878 790 986 876
Stage 2 - 935 850 967 845 Stage 2 - - 981 876 878 760
HCM Control Delay,s U 0 9.6 8,6 HCM Control Delay,a 01 0 91 8A
HCM LOS A A HCM LOS A A
Capacity(veh/h) 858 1551 1559 1013 Capacity(voh/h) 810 1592 - 1457 1054
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.095 0.002 - - 0.015 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0.009 - - 0.008
HCM Control Delay(a) 9,6 7.3 0 a U HCM Control Delay(a) 91 7.3 0 j 0 8A
HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A A A
HCM 95th%file Q(veh) 03 0 0 0 HCM 95th-Mle,Q(veh) 02 0 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 12 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 12
2027 Total AM 11:Resort Blvd&Access C 2027 Total PM 11:Resort Blvd&Access C
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.8 Int Delay,s/veh 1.1
10"
Lane Configurations Y Lane Configurations 4 T# Y
Traffic Vol,vehilln 1 17 38 0 0 5 Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 36 15 0 0 3
Future Vol,veh/h 1 17 38 0 0 5 Future Vol,veh/h 5 36 15 0 0 3
Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Channelized None None . None FIT Chatirrelized None None - None
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,If 0 0 0 Van in Median Storage,# 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Ptak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 21 48 0 0 6 MvmtFbw 6 45 19 0 0 4
Conflicting Flow All 48 0 - 0 71 48 Conflicting Flow All 19 0 - 0 76 19
Stage 1 48 - Stage;1 - 19 -
Stage 2 - 23 - Stage 2 - 57 -
Ciflical Hdwy 4.12 642 622 Critical Hdwy 4,12 6,42 6,22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5A2 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 SA2 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 933 1021 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1597 927 1059
Stage I - 974 - Stage I - 1004 -
Stage 2 1000 Stage;2 - 966 -
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov,Cap-1 Maneuver 1559 932 i1021 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1597 923 1059
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 932 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 923 -
Stage 1 973 Stage 1 1000
Stage 2 - 1000 Stage 2 966
IN
HCM Control Delay,s 0,4 0 8.5 HCM Control Delay,a (L9 0 8A
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(vish1h) 1559 - 1021 Capacity(veh/h) 1597 - 1059
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.006 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.004 - 0.004
HCM Control Delay(a) 7.3 0 &S HCM Control Delay(a) 73 0 SA
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
ROM 95th%tileD(veh) 0 0 HCM 95t1'Mie Q(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 13 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 13
2027 Total AM 12:Resort Blvd&Access D 2027 Total PM 12:Resort Blvd&Access D
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 Int Delay,s/veh 0.8
Lane Configurationsr Lane Configurations
Tramo Vol,vehill 1 16 34 0 0 3 Traffic Vol,vah/h 3 33 13 0 0 2
Future Vol,veh/h 1 16 34 0 0 3 Future Vol,veh/h 3 33 13 0 0 2
Conflicting Reds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 Conflicting Peds,#1hr D 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Chandelized i None None . stone RT Channel zed None None - None
Storage Length 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 a 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 20 43 0 0 4 Mvmt Flow 4 41 16 0 0 3
Conflicting Flow All 43 0 - 0 65 43 Conflicting Flow All 16 0 - 0 65 16
Stage 1 43 - stage I - 16
Stage 2 - 22 - Stage 2 - 49 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 6,42 6,22 Critical Hdwy 4,12 642 622
Critical Hdwy SIg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5,42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1566 941 1027 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 941 1063
Stage I - 979 - Stage I - 1007 -
Stage 2 1001 Stage 2 973
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 4566 940 I1027 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1602 936 1063
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 940 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 938 -
Stage 1 978 stage 1 1004
Stage 2 - 1001 Stage 2 - 973
HCM Control Delay,a 0.4 0 8,5 HCM Control Delay,a 0,6 0 8,4
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh/h) 1566 1027 Capacity(vablh) 1602 1063
HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.001 0.004 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.002
HCM Control Delay(s) T3 0 8,5 HCM Control Delay(s) 7.3 0 8,4
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th%ilie Q(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 0
07/15/2022 Synchic 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 14 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 14
2027 Total AM 13:Resort Blvd&Access E 2027 Total PM 13:Resort Blvd&Access E
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray HCM 6th TWSC
roll
Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 Int Delay,s/veh 0.9
13,
Lane Configurations Y Lane Configurations 4 T4 Y
Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 15 31 0 0 3 Traffic Vol,veh/h 3 30 11 0 0 2
Future Vol,veh/h 1 15 31 0 0 3 Future Vol,veh/h 3 30 11 0 0 2
Conflicting Reds,Whr 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
FIT Chaintrelized i None Norte - None FIT Channel zed None None t - None
Storage Length - 0 Storage Length - 0
Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Van in Median Storage,If 0 0 0
Grade,% 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80
Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 19 39 0 0 4 Mvmt Flow 4 38 14 0 0 3
Conflicting Flow All 39 0 - 0 60 39 Conflicting Flow All 14 0 - 0 60 14
Stage 1 39 - Stage 1 14
Stage 2 21 - Stage 2 46 -
Crtfical Hdwy 4,12 6.42 622 Critical Hdwy 412 6.42 622
Critical Hdwy Stg I - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg I - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 . 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5,42
Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318 Follow-up Hdwy 2,218 3.518 3,318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1571 947 1033 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1604 947 1066
Stage 1 - 983 - Stage I - 1009 -
Stage 2 1002 stage,2 - 976
Platoon blocked,% Platoon blocked,%
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1571 946 1033 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1604 944 1066
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 946 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 944 -
Stage 1 982 stage 1 1006
Stage 2 1002 Stage 2 - 976
HCM Control Delay,a U 0 8.5 HCM Control Delay,a 07 0 8.4
HCM LOS A HCM LOS A
Capacity(veh1h) 1571 1033 Capacity(veh/h) 1604 - 1066
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.004 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.002
HCM Control Delay(a) 7.3 0 &5 HCM Control Delay(a) 7.2 0 BA
HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th%file O(veh) 0 0 HCM 95th%tile 0(veh) 0
07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report 07/15/2022 Synchro 11 Report
CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 15 CjvTech Inc.-CM Page 15
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX L
QUEUE STORAGE ANALYSIS
,C4'0'--E—E, C i v T e c h
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray
Queue Length Analysis
2027 Queue Storage
:Average Vehicle Length(it): 26 s.
'Trucks>10%? N
Veh.Type %Vehicles
25 Passenger 98%.
R •.
1 Goldfield Rd&Old 1-Way Stop(WB) - _ _(_) SB Left 45 18 21 1 1 1 1 - - - - 25' 25' 25' 25'(25') 100' BREW
175' 175(175)
West Hwy SEB WB Left 35 64 67 3 3 1 1 - - - - 25' 25' 25' 25'(25') 150' 150' 150'(150') 245' 60' 180' 180' 180' 180(180)
2 Goldfield Rd&Old: 2-Way,Stop _ -(-) WB Right No 35 10 6 1 1 1 1 - - - <25'(<25') 100': 100' 100'(S00') 245' 60': 110 110 110(110)
West Hwy NWB Control(EB/WB) :<25' <25' <25' 110'
Goldfield Rd&US-
3 60/Old West Highway 1-Way Stop(WB) - - -(-) WB Right No 45 179 121 6 4 1 1 - - - - 25'(25') 225' 175' 225'(175') 405' 90' 310' 400' 400(310)
Exit 25' 25' 25' 400'
NB Left 35 100 66 4 3 1 1 5 4 S 1 1 5' 25' :25' 5'(25') 200' 4 175' 200'(175') 245' 60' 215' 180 215' 215(180)4
90)d 90 ali 4 Signalized 90 90(
Goldfield Road and US- Sign WB Left 45 9 26 1 1 1 1 1 2 : 1 1 20' 40' 40' 20'(40') 100' 125 100'(125') 405' 90': 175' 175 175 175(175)
.
60 WB Ramps S 5B Right No 35 133 '95 5 4 1 1 7 5 1 1 +r25 20' :20' <25"(20') 250' I 200' :250'(200') 245' 60' 250' 215 250 250(215)
WB Right No 45 18 i42 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 i<25' <25'i<25' <25'(<25') 100' 150' 100'(150') 405 90, i 175' 220 220 175(220)
SB Left 35 136 186 5 7 1 1 7 10 1 1 5' 20' 20' 5'(20') 250' 325' 250'(325') 245' 60' 250' 320' 320' 250(320)
5 Goldfield Road and US- Signalized 90 90 90(90) EB Left 45 81 144 3 5 1 1 4 8 1 1 <25' 100' 100' <25'(100') 175' 275' 175'(275') 405' 90' 265' 355' 355' 265(355)
60 EB Ramps NB Right No 35 24 47 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 <25' 5' 5' <25'(5') 125' 150' 125'(150') 245' 60' 110' 145' 145' 110(145)
EB Right No 45 52 106 2 4 1 1 3 6 1 1 <25' 35' 35' <25'(35) 150' 225' 150'(225') 405' 90' 220' 310' 310' 220(310)
Goldfield Road and 2-Way Stop NB Left 35 0 1 0 1 0 1 - <25' <25' <25' <25'(<2T) 0' 100' 0'(100') 245' 60' : 90' 110 110 90(110)
6 -(-) SB Left 35 23 38 1 2 1 1 25' 25' 25' 25'(25') 100' 125' '.100'(125') 245 60' 110' 145 145 110(145)'
Chevron Access Control(EB/WB} NB Right No 35 9 9 1 1 1 1 - - ;<25' <25 <25 <25'(<25') 100' i 100' 100'(S00') 245' 60' 110' 110 110 110(110)
7 Goldfield Road and 1-Way Stop(WB) - - -(-) SB Left 35 46 98 2 4 1 1 - - - - 25'(25') 125' 175' 125'(175') 245' 60' 215' 215' 145(215)
Resort Boulevard 25' 25' 25' 145'
IV`OCh 1 A- d -
I
Alliance Broadstone Silveray—Apache Junction, AZ Traffic Impact Analysis
APPENDIX M
SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
,C4'O'--E—E, C i v T e c h
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access A&Chevron Access Location:Access A&Chevron Access
Assumptions and/or Givens Intersection Sight Distances
Elements of Design from AASHTO 6th Edition AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Driver Eye Height Case B—Intersections with Stop Control on the Minor Road §9.5.3.2,p 9-42
Passenger Vehicle 3.50 ft §3.2.6.1,p 3-15
Truck 7.60 ft §3.2.6.1,p 3-15 Case Bt—Left Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-43
Object Height
Stopping Sight Distance 2.00 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Design Vehicle Time Gap(tg)
Passing Sight Distance 3.50 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Passenger Car 7.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
Vehicle Height 4.25 ft §3.2.6.1,p 3-15 Single-Unit Tuck 9.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
Driver Eye Location Combination Truck 11.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
From Edge of Major Rd Traveled Way 14.50 ft §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-43
Deceleration Rate(a) Time gap adjustments
Passenger Vehicle 11.20 ft/secz §3.2.2.2,in 3-4 Addl lanes to cross(1'is assumed)
Truck N/A ft Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Brake reaction time(t) 2.50 sec §3.2.2.1,p 3-3 Trucks 0.7 sec below
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) 0.2 sec Tbi 9-5,p 9-37
Site Specific Data(Bike&turn lanes are outside traveled wa and are not considered)
Major Street Design Speed(V_j,) 30 MPH Site data
Grades-Approaching Minor Street from:(—=approach downhill) Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Left(G,) % Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Right(GR) %
Approach Grade Adjustment Factor Left 1.0 Tbi 9-5,p 9-42
Right 1.0 Time Gap based on site data
Major Road Through Lanes on Each Approach (Use 1 for RI/RO[/LI]only) Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%+Adjs forAdd'I Lanes&Median
Median Width(in"Lane Equivalents") [��](Use 0 for RI/RO[/LI]only) Passenger Car 7.0 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% % Single-Unit Tuck 8.8 sec
Minor Road Access(check restricted) L Combination Truck 10.8 sec
LI LO/Th RO
ISD to left&right along Major Road ISD=1.47V_j,,t9 (it) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Stopping Sight Distance=Brake Reaction Distance+Braking Distance
Neglecting Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+1.075 VZ Eq 3-2,p 3-5 ISO to Left
a and Right
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 308.7 ft
Calculated d= 196.7 ft design ISD= 310 ft
Design d= 200 ft
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 388.1 ft
With Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+ Vz Eq 3-3,in 3-5 design ISD= 390 ft
30(( 32.2 )tG) Combination Truck calculated ISD= 476.3 ft
design ISD= 480 ft
Calculated d= 196.3ft-left
200 ft-right
Design d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
SSD's do not consider design for truck operations,since better visibility is
considered to offset longer braking distance. §3.2.2.5,p 3-6
CIVTe h Appendix M CIVTech Appendix M
Page 1 of 4 July 2022 Page 2 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access A&Chevron Access Location:Access A&Chevron Access
Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd) Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd)
AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Case B2-Right Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Case FLeft Turns from the Major Road §9.5.3.6,p 9-56
Case B3-Crossin_q Maneuver from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 Design Vehicle Time Gap(tg)
Passenger Car 5.5 sec Tel 9-16,p 9-57
Design Vehicle Time Gap(tg) Single-Unit Tuck 6.5 sec Tel 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 6.5 sec Tbl 9-8,p 9-47 Combination Truck 7.5 sec Tel 9-16,p 9-57
Single-Unit Tuck 8.5 sec &
Combination Truck 10.5 sec Tbl 9-10,p 9-49 Time gap adjustments
Add'I lanes to cross(1 assumed)
Time gap adjustments Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes to
Add'I lanes to cross(1'`is assumed)-Case B-3 Only* Trucks 0.7 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Trucks 0.7 sec below Site data
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) Opposing Lanes(adj'd for x-wide median) -1.0
Case B-2 Only 0.1 sec Tbl 9-8,p 9-47
Case B-3 Only 0.2 sec Tbl 9-10,p 9-49 Time Gap based on site data
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Add'/Opposing Lanes
Site data Passenger Car 5.0 sec
Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Single-Unit Tuck 5.8 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Combination Truck 6.8 sec
ISO to front along Major Road ISD=1 A7V_r,,t9 (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Time Gap based on site data(sec) B2&B3 B3 Only Passenger Car calculated ISD= 220.5 ft
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%(+Adjs for Add'I Lanes&Median for B3) design ISD= 225 ft
Passenger Car 6.0 5.5
Single-Unit Tuck 7.8 7.1 Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 255.8 ft
Combination Truck 9.8 9.1 design ISD= 260 ft
SO to left(62/B3)&right(83)along Major Rd ISD=1.47V_j,t9 (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45 Combination Truck calculated ISD= 299.9 ft
design ISD= 300 ft
ISD to Left ISO to right
(B2&B3) (B3 Only) The differences between Case F and Cases B1,B2&B3 are reduced
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 264.6 242.6 time gaps and no time gap adjustment for any minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.6,p 9-58
design ISD= 265 245
SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 344o 313.1
design ISD= 345 315 0
EBBEEMM
Combination Truck calculated ISD= 432.2 401.3 Stopping
design ISD= 435 405 Without effect of grade 200 N/A N/A
With effect of grade on left 200 N/A N/A
*Number of major road lanes is irrelevant in Case B2. With effect of grade on right 200 N/A WA
Intersection
The differences between Case B1 and Cases B2&B3 are reduced To Right B1 310 390 480
time gaps and time gap adjustment for the minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 To Left B2/B3 265 345 435
On Major Road F 225 260 300
iStTeCh Appendix M CivTeCh Appendix M
Page 3 of 4 July 2022 C7 Page 4 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access B&Resort Blvd Location:Access B&Resort Blvd
Assumptions and/or Givens Intersection Sight Distances
Elements of Design from AASHTO 6th Edition AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Driver Eye Height Case B—Intersections with Stop Control on the Minor Road §9.5.3.2,p 9-42
Passenger Vehicle 3.50 ft §3.2.6.1,p 3-15
Truck 7,60 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Case 61—left Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.321,p 9-43
Object Height
Stopping Sight Distance 2.00 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Design Vehicle Time Gap(Ig)
Passing Sight Distance 3.50 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Passenger Car 7.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 944
Vehicle Height 4,25 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Single-Unit Tuck 9.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
Driver Eye Location Combination Truck 11.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
From Edge of Major Rd Traveled Way 14,50 ft §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-43
Deceleration Rate(a) Time gap adjustments
Passenger Vehicle 11.20 ft/secz §3222,p 34 Add'I lanes to cross(V is assumed)
Truck N/A ft Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Brake reaction time(t) 2.50 sec §3.2.2.1,p 3-3 Trucks 0.7 sec below
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) 0.2 sec Tbl 9-5,p 9-37
Site Specific Data(Bike&turn lanes are outside traveled wa and are not considered)
Major Street Design Speed(V,aia) 30 MPH Site data
Grades-Approaching Minor Street from:(—=approach downhill) Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Left(GJ / Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Right(GR) %
Approach Grade Adjustment Factor Left 1.0 Tbl 9-5,p 9-42
Right 1.0 Time Gap based on site data
Major Road Through Lanes on Each Approach (Use 1 for RI/ROVLI]only) Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%+Adis forAddl Lanes&Median
Median Width(in"Lane Equivalents") (Use 0 for RI/ROVLI]only) Passenger Car 7.0 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% % Single-Unit Tuck 8.8 sec
Minor Road Access(check restricted) I Combination Truck 10.8 sec
LI LO/Th RO
ISO to left&right along Major Road ISD=147VmaiA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Stopping Sight Distance=Brake Reaction Distance+Braking Distance
Neglecting Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+1.075 Vz Eq 3-2,p 3-5 ISD to Left
a and Right
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 308.7 ft
Calculated d= 196.7 ft design ISD= 310 ft
Design d= 200 ft
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 388.1 ft
With Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+ VZ Eq 3-3,p 3-5 design ISD= 390 ft
30(( 32.2 )tG) Combination Truck calculated ISD= 476.3 ft
design ISD= 480 ft
Calculated d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
Design d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
SSD's do not consider design for truck operations,since better visibility is
considered to offset longer braking distance. §3.2.2.5,p 3-6
6,1
iVT h Appendix M Appendix M
Page 1 of 4 July 2022 Page 2 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access B&Resort Blvd Location:Access B&Resort Blvd
Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd) Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd)
AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Case 62-Right Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Case FLeft Turns from the Major Road §9.5.3.6,p 9-56
Case 133-Crossinq Maneuver from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9)
Passenger Car 5.5 sec TbI 9-16,p 9-57
Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9) Single-Unit Tuck 6.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 6.5 sec Tbl 9-8,p 9-47 Combination Truck 7.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Single-Unit Tuck 8.5 sec &
Combination Truck 10.5 sec Tbl 9-10,p 9-49 Time gap adjustments
Add'I lanes to cross(1 assumed)
Time gap adjustments Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes to
Add'I lanes to cross(1"is assumed)-Case B-3 Only* Trucks 0.7 sec Tbi 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Trucks 0.7 sec below Site data
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) Opposing Lanes(add d for x-wide median) -1.0
Case B-2 Only 0.1 sec Tbl 9-8,In 9-47
Case B-3 Only 0.2 sec Tbi 9-10,p 9-49 Time Gap based on site data
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj forAdd'1 Opposing Lanes
Site data Passenger Car 5.0 sec
Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Single-Unit Tuck 5.8 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Combination Truck 6.8 sec
ISO to front along Major Road ISD=1 A7V,,,aio,t9 (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Time Gap based on site data(sec) B2&63 B3 Only Passenger Car calculated ISD= 220.5 It
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%(+Adis forAdr/7 Lanes&Median for83) design ISD= 225 ft
Passenger Car 6.0 5.5
Single-Unit Tuck 7.8 7.1 Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 255.8 It
Combination Truck 9.8 9.1 design ISD= 260 It
ISD to left(B2/63)&right(63)along Major Rd ISD=1.47Vm iA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45 Combination Truck calculated ISD= 299.9 ft
design ISD= 300 It
ISD to Left ISD to right
(B2&83) (133 Only) The differences between Case F and Cases B1,B2&B3 are reduced
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 264.6 242.6 time gaps and no time gap adjustment for any minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.6,p 9-58
design ISD= 265 245
SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 344.0 313.1
design ISD= 345 315
Combination Truck calculated ISD= 432.2 401.3 Stopping
design ISD= 435 405 Without effect of grade 200 N/A N/A
With effect of grade on left 200 N/A N/A
*Number of major road lanes is irrelevant in Case 62. With effect of grade on right 200 N/A N/A
Intersection
The differences between Case 61 and Cases 62&133 are reduced To Right 61 310 390 480
time gaps and time gap adjustment for the minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 To Left 62/63 265 345 435
On Major Road F 225 260 300
IVTe h Appendix M CIVTeCh Appendix M
Page 3 of 4 July 2022 Page 4 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access C&Resort Blvd Location:Access C&Resort Blvd
Assumptions and/or Givens Intersection Sight Distances
Elements of Design from AASHTO 6th Edition AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Driver Eye Height Case B—Intersections with Stop Control on the Minor Road §9.5.3.2,p 9-42
Passenger Vehicle 3.50 ft §3.2.6.1,p 3-15
Truck 7,60 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Case 61—left Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.321,p 9-43
Object Height
Stopping Sight Distance 2.00 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Design Vehicle Time Gap(Ig)
Passing Sight Distance 3.50 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Passenger Car 7.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 944
Vehicle Height 4,25 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Single-Unit Tuck 9.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
Driver Eye Location Combination Truck 11.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
From Edge of Major Rd Traveled Way 14,50 ft §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-43
Deceleration Rate(a) Time gap adjustments
Passenger Vehicle 11.20 ft/secz §3222,p 34 Add'I lanes to cross(V is assumed)
Truck N/A ft Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Brake reaction time(t) 2.50 sec §3.2.2.1,p 3-3 Trucks 0.7 sec below
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) 0.2 sec Tbl 9-5,p 9-37
Site Specific Data(Bike&turn lanes are outside traveled wa and are not considered)
Major Street Design Speed(V,aia) 30 MPH Site data
Grades-Approaching Minor Street from:(—=approach downhill) Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Left(GJ / Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Right(GR) %
Approach Grade Adjustment Factor Left 1.0 Tbl 9-5,p 9-42
Right 1.0 Time Gap based on site data
Major Road Through Lanes on Each Approach (Use 1 for RI/ROVLI]only) Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%+Adis forAddl Lanes&Median
Median Width(in"Lane Equivalents") (Use 0 for RI/ROVLI]only) Passenger Car 7.0 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% % Single-Unit Tuck 8.8 sec
Minor Road Access(check restricted) I Combination Truck 10.8 sec
LI LO/Th RO
ISO to left&right along Major Road ISD=147VmaiA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Stopping Sight Distance=Brake Reaction Distance+Braking Distance
Neglecting Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+1.075 Vz Eq 3-2,p 3-5 ISD to Left
a and Right
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 308.7 ft
Calculated d= 196.7 ft design ISD= 310 ft
Design d= 200 ft
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 388.1 ft
With Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+ VZ Eq 3-3,p 3-5 design ISD= 390 ft
30(( 32.2 )tG) Combination Truck calculated ISD= 476.3 ft
design ISD= 480 ft
Calculated d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
Design d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
SSD's do not consider design for truck operations,since better visibility is
considered to offset longer braking distance. §3.2.2.5,p 3-6
6,1
iVT Ch Appendix M Appendix M
Page 1 of 4 July 2022 Page 2 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access C&Resort Blvd Location:Access C&Resort Blvd
Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd) Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd)
AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Case 62-Right Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Case FLeft Turns from the Major Road §9.5.3.6,p 9-56
Case 133-Crossinq Maneuver from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9)
Passenger Car 5.5 sec TbI 9-16,p 9-57
Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9) Single-Unit Tuck 6.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 6.5 sec Tbl 9-8,p 9-47 Combination Truck 7.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Single-Unit Tuck 8.5 sec &
Combination Truck 10.5 sec Tbl 9-10,p 9-49 Time gap adjustments
Add'I lanes to cross(1 assumed)
Time gap adjustments Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes to
Add'I lanes to cross(1"is assumed)-Case B-3 Only* Trucks 0.7 sec Tbi 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Trucks 0.7 sec below Site data
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) Opposing Lanes(add d for x-wide median) -1.0
Case B-2 Only 0.1 sec Tbl 9-8,In 9-47
Case B-3 Only 0.2 sec Tbi 9-10,p 9-49 Time Gap based on site data
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj forAdd'1 Opposing Lanes
Site data Passenger Car 5.0 sec
Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Single-Unit Tuck 5.8 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Combination Truck 6.8 sec
ISO to front along Major Road ISD=1 A7V,,,alo,t9 (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Time Gap based on site data(sec) B2&63 B3 Only Passenger Car calculated ISD= 220.5 It
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%(+Adis forAdr/7 Lanes&Median for83) design ISD= 225 ft
Passenger Car 6.0 5.5
Single-Unit Tuck 7.8 7.1 Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 255.8 It
Combination Truck 9.8 9.1 design ISD= 260 It
ISD to left(B2/63)&right(63)along Major Rd ISD=1.47VmaiA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45 Combination Truck calculated ISD= 299.9 ft
design ISD= 300 It
ISD to Left ISD to right
(B2&83) (133 Only) The differences between Case F and Cases B1,B2&B3 are reduced
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 264.6 242.6 time gaps and no time gap adjustment for any minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.6,p 9-58
design ISD= 265 245
SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 344.0 313.1
design ISD= 345 315
Combination Truck calculated ISD= 432.2 401.3 Stopping
design ISD= 435 405 Without effect of grade 200 N/A N/A
With effect of grade on left 200 N/A N/A
*Number of major road lanes is irrelevant in Case 62. With effect of grade on right 200 N/A N/A
Intersection
The differences between Case 61 and Cases 62&133 are reduced To Right 61 310 390 480
time gaps and time gap adjustment for the minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 To Left 62/63 265 345 435
On Major Road F 225 260 300
IVTeCh Appendix M CIVTeCh Appendix M
Page 3 of 4 July 2022 Page 4 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access D&Resort Blvd Location:Access D&Resort Blvd
Assumptions and/or Givens Intersection Sight Distances
Elements of Design from AASHTO 6th Edition AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Driver Eye Height Case B—Intersections with Stop Control on the Minor Road §9.5.3.2,p 9-42
Passenger Vehicle 3.50 ft §3.2.6.1,p 3-15
Truck 7,60 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Case 61—left Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.321,p 9-43
Object Height
Stopping Sight Distance 2.00 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Design Vehicle Time Gap(Ig)
Passing Sight Distance 3.50 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Passenger Car 7.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 944
Vehicle Height 4,25 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Single-Unit Tuck 9.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
Driver Eye Location Combination Truck 11.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
From Edge of Major Rd Traveled Way 14,50 ft §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-43
Deceleration Rate(a) Time gap adjustments
Passenger Vehicle 11.20 ft/secz §3222,p 34 Add'I lanes to cross(V is assumed)
Truck N/A ft Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Brake reaction time(t) 2.50 sec §3.2.2.1,p 3-3 Trucks 0.7 sec below
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) 0.2 sec Tbl 9-5,p 9-37
Site Specific Data(Bike&turn lanes are outside traveled wa and are not considered)
Major Street Design Speed(V,aia) 30 MPH Site data
Grades-Approaching Minor Street from:(—=approach downhill) Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Left(GJ / Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Right(GR) %
Approach Grade Adjustment Factor Left 1.0 Tbl 9-5,p 9-42
Right 1.0 Time Gap based on site data
Major Road Through Lanes on Each Approach (Use 1 for RI/ROVLI]only) Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%+Adis forAddl Lanes&Median
Median Width(in"Lane Equivalents") (Use 0 for RI/ROVLI]only) Passenger Car 7.0 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% % Single-Unit Tuck 8.8 sec
Minor Road Access(check restricted) I Combination Truck 10.8 sec
LI LO/Th RO
ISO to left&right along Major Road ISD=147VmaiA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Stopping Sight Distance=Brake Reaction Distance+Braking Distance
Neglecting Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+1.075 Vz Eq 3-2,p 3-5 ISD to Left
a and Right
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 308.7 ft
Calculated d= 196.7 ft design ISD= 310 ft
Design d= 200 ft
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 388.1 ft
With Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+ VZ Eq 3-3,p 3-5 design ISD= 390 ft
30(( 32.2 )tG) Combination Truck calculated ISD= 476.3 ft
design ISD= 480 ft
Calculated d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
Design d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
SSD's do not consider design for truck operations,since better visibility is
considered to offset longer braking distance. §3.2.2.5,p 3-6
6,1
iVT h Appendix M Appendix M
Page 1 of 4 July 2022 Page 2 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access D&Resort Blvd Location:Access D&Resort Blvd
Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd) Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd)
AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Case 62-Right Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Case FLeft Turns from the Major Road §9.5.3.6,p 9-56
Case 133-Crossinq Maneuver from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9)
Passenger Car 5.5 sec TbI 9-16,p 9-57
Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9) Single-Unit Tuck 6.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 6.5 sec Tbl 9-8,p 9-47 Combination Truck 7.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Single-Unit Tuck 8.5 sec &
Combination Truck 10.5 sec Tbl 9-10,p 9-49 Time gap adjustments
Add'I lanes to cross(1 assumed)
Time gap adjustments Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes to
Add'I lanes to cross(1"is assumed)-Case B-3 Only* Trucks 0.7 sec Tbi 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Trucks 0.7 sec below Site data
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) Opposing Lanes(add d for x-wide median) -1.0
Case B-2 Only 0.1 sec Tbl 9-8,In 9-47
Case B-3 Only 0.2 sec Tbi 9-10,p 9-49 Time Gap based on site data
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj forAdd'1 Opposing Lanes
Site data Passenger Car 5.0 sec
Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Single-Unit Tuck 5.8 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Combination Truck 6.8 sec
ISO to front along Major Road ISD=1 A7V,,,aio,t9 (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Time Gap based on site data(sec) B2&63 B3 Only Passenger Car calculated ISD= 220.5 It
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%(+Adis forAdr/7 Lanes&Median for83) design ISD= 225 ft
Passenger Car 6.0 5.5
Single-Unit Tuck 7.8 7.1 Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 255.8 It
Combination Truck 9.8 9.1 design ISD= 260 It
ISD to left(B2/63)&right(63)along Major Rd ISD=1.47Vm iA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45 Combination Truck calculated ISD= 299.9 ft
design ISD= 300 It
ISD to Left ISD to right
(B2&63) (63 Only) The differences between Case F and Cases B1,B2&B3 are reduced
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 264.6 242.6 time gaps and no time gap adjustment for any minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.6,p 9-58
design ISD= 265 245
SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 344.0 313.1
design ISD= 345 315
Combination Truck calculated ISD= 432.2 401.3 Stopping
design ISD= 435 405 Without effect of grade 200 N/A N/A
With effect of grade on left 200 N/A N/A
*Number of major road lanes is irrelevant in Case 62. With effect of grade on right 200 N/A N/A
Intersection
The differences between Case 61 and Cases 62&63 are reduced To Right 61 310 390 480
time gaps and time gap adjustment for the minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 To Left 62/63 265 345 435
On Major Road F 225 260 300
IVTe h Appendix M CIVTeCh Appendix M
Page 3 of 4 July 2022 Page 4 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access E&Resort Blvd Location:Access E&Resort Blvd
Assumptions and/or Givens Intersection Sight Distances
Elements of Design from AASHTO 6th Edition AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Driver Eye Height Case B—Intersections with Stop Control on the Minor Road §9.5.3.2,p 9-42
Passenger Vehicle 3.50 it §3.2.6.1,p 3-15
Truck 7,60 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Case 61—Left Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.321,p 9-43
Object Height
Stopping Sight Distance 2.00 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Design Vehicle Time Gap(Ig)
Passing Sight Distance 3.50 ft §3.2.6.2,p 3-15 Passenger Car 7.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 944
Vehicle Height 4,25 ft §3.2.6A,p 3-15 Single-Unit Tuck 9.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
Driver Eye Location Combination Truck 11.5 sec Tbl 9-6,p 9-44
From Edge of Major Rd Traveled Way 14,50 ft §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-43
Deceleration Rate(a) Time gap adjustments
Passenger Vehicle 11.20 ft/secz §3222,p 34 Add'I lanes to cross(V is assumed)
Truck N/A ft Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Brake reaction time(t) 2.50 sec §3.2.2.1,p 3-3 Trucks 0.7 sec below
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) 0.2 sec Tbl 9-5,p 9-37
Site Specific Data(Bike&turn lanes are outside traveled wa and are not considered)
Major Street Design Speed(V,aia) 30 MPH Site data
Grades-Approaching Minor Street from:(—=approach downhill) Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Left(GJ / Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.1,p 9-44
Right(GR) %
Approach Grade Adjustment Factor Left 1.0 Tbl 9-5,p 9-42
Right 1.0 Time Gap based on site data
Major Road Through Lanes on Each Approach (Use 1 for RI/ROVLI]only) Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%+Adjs forAddl Lanes&Median
Median Width(in"Lane Equivalents") (Use 0 for RI/ROVLI]only) Passenger Car 7.0 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% % Single-Unit Tuck 8.8 sec
Minor Road Access(check restricted) I Combination Truck 10.8 sec
LI LO/Th RO
ISO to left&right along Major Road ISD=147VmaiA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Stopping Sight Distance=Brake Reaction Distance+Braking Distance
Neglecting Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+1.075 Vz Eq 3-2,p 3-5 ISD to Left
a and Right
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 308.7 ft
Calculated d= 196.7 ft design ISD= 310 ft
Design d= 200 ft
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 388.1 ft
With Effect of Grade d=1.47Vt+ VZ Eq 3-3,p 3-5 design ISD= 390 ft
30(( 32.2 )tG) Combination Truck calculated ISD= 476.3 ft
design ISD= 480 ft
Calculated d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
Design d= 196.3 ft-left
200 ft-right
SSD's do not consider design for truck operations,since better visibility is
considered to offset longer braking distance. §3.2.2.5,p 3-6
6,1
iVT h Appendix M y T h Appendix M
Page 1 of 4 July 2022 Page 2 of 4 July 2022
22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis 22-1180 Alliance Broadstone Silveray Sight Distance Analysis
Location:Access E&Resort Blvd Location:Access E&Resort Blvd
Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd) Intersection Sight Distances(cont'd)
AASHTO Ref AASHTO Ref
Case 62-Right Turn from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Case FLeft Turns from the Major Road §9.5.3.6,p 9-56
Case 133-Crossinq Maneuver from the Minor Road §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9)
Passenger Car 5.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Design Vehicle Time Gap(t9) Single-Unit Tuck 6.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 6.5 sec Tbl 9-8,p 9-47 Combination Truck 7.5 sec Tbl 9-16,p 9-57
Single-Unit Tuck 8.5 sec &
Combination Truck 10.5 sec Tbl 9-10,p 9-49 Time gap adjustments
Add'I lanes to cross(1 assumed)
Time gap adjustments Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes to
Add'I lanes to cross(1"is assumed)-Case B-3 Only* Trucks 0.7 sec Tbi 9-16,p 9-57
Passenger Car 0.5 sec See Notes
Trucks 0.7 sec below Site data
Minor Approach Upgrade(Per each 1%>3%) Opposing Lanes(add d for x-wide median) -1.0
Case B-2 Only 0.1 sec Tbl 9-8,In 9-47
Case B-3 Only 0.2 sec Tbi 9-10,p 9-49 Time Gap based on site data
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj forAdd'1 Opposing Lanes
Site data Passenger Car 5.0 sec
Major Road Lanes on Left Approach 0.0 §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Single-Unit Tuck 5.8 sec
Minor Road Approach Upgrade,if>3% 0% §9.5.3.2.2,p 9-47 Combination Truck 6.8 sec
ISO to front along Major Road ISD=1 A7V,,,aio,t9 (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45
Time Gap based on site data(sec) B2&63 B3 Only Passenger Car calculated ISD= 220.5 It
Design Vehicle Gap+Adj for Approach Grade>3%(+Adis forAdr/7 Lanes&Median for83) design ISD= 225 ft
Passenger Car 6.0 5.5
Single-Unit Tuck 7.8 7.1 Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 255.8 It
Combination Truck 9.8 9.1 design ISD= 260 It
ISD to left(B2/63)&right(63)along Major Rd ISD=1.47Vm iA (ft) Eq 9-1,p 9-45 Combination Truck calculated ISD= 299.9 ft
design ISD= 300 It
ISD to Left ISD to right
(B2&63) (63 Only) The differences between Case F and Cases B1,B2&B3 are reduced
Passenger Car calculated ISD= 264.6 242.6 time gaps and no time gap adjustment for any minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.6,p 9-58
design ISD= 265 245
SIGHT DISTANCE SUMMARY
Single-Unit Tuck calculated ISD= 344.0 313.1
design ISD= 345 315
Combination Truck calculated ISD= 432.2 401.3 Stopping
design ISD= 435 405 Without effect of grade 200 N/A N/A
With effect of grade on left 200 N/A N/A
*Number of major road lanes is irrelevant in Case 62. With effect of grade on right 200 N/A N/A
Intersection
The differences between Case 61 and Cases 62&63 are reduced To Right 61 310 390 480
time gaps and time gap adjustment for the minor approach upgrade. §9.5.3.2.3,p 9-48 To Left 62/63 265 345 435
On Major Road F 225 260 300
IVTe h Appendix M CIVTeCh Appendix M
Page 3 of 4 July 2022 Page 4 of 4 July 2022
feet)between delineators is the same as the speed limit(in miles per hour)for the roadway.
(D) Conduits, sleeves or care ier pipes. Projects that have parkway landscaping with irrigation lines under public streets
shall install conduit sleeves for the irrigation line(s)prior to the paving improvements. All parkway landscaping shall be as
directed and approved by the Apache Junction Parks and Recreation Department.
(E) Signage and striping. All signage and striping shall be per the latest MUTCD and approved by the Development
Services Engineer.
(Ord. 1282, § 3.3,passed 11-7-2006)
§ I0-3-4 DESIGN GUIDELINES.
Street design will be in accordance with the following criteria,subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Geometric
design standards not specifically included in this Standard will conform to the latest A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets, published by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO).
(A) Street right-of--way requirements.
(1) The right-of-way requirements shall be as shown in Apache Junction Standard Details AJ-20.1 through AJ-20.8.
(2) Right-of-way widths in excess of the standard widths may be required in special circumstances such as when:
(a) Cut or fill slopes cannot be confined within the standard width;
(b) Minimum sight distance lines on horizontal curves are not within standards;
(c) Minimum sight distances at intersections are not within the standards;and
(d) Auxiliary lanes are to be provided.
(B) Intersections. Although all intersections share certain common elements,they are not subject to generalized treatment.
(1) Minimize conflict. To minimize conflicts and provide for anticipated traffic movements,each intersection must be
evaluated with regard to its individual characteristics,and designed based on the following factors:
(a) Traffic factors such as capacities,turning movements,vehicle size and operating characteristics,vehicle speed,
pedestrian movements,transit operations and accident history;
(b) Physical factors such as topography,existing conditions,channelization requirements; and
(c) Human factors such as driving habits,reaction to surprises,decision and reaction time, and natural paths of
movement.
(2) Angle of intersection. A right-angle intersection provides the shortest crossing distance for intersecting traffic
streams. It also provides the most favorable condition for drivers to judge the relative position and speed of intersecting
vehicles. Where special conditions exist,intersection angles may diverge from a right angle with approval of the City
Engineer.
(3) Alignment and profile. Intersections occurring on horizontal or crest vertical curves are undesirable. When there is
latitude in the selection of intersection locations,vertical or horizontal curvature should be avoided. A line or grade change is
frequently warranted when major intersections are involved. If a curve is unavoidable,it should be as flat as site conditions
permit. Where the grade of the through roadway is steep,flattening through the intersections is desirable as a safety measure.
(4) Intersection sight visibility.
(a) Sight visibility triangles. Clear lines of sight will be maintained along all streets,alleys and driveways to assure the
safety of motorists and pedestrians.
(b) .Lines of sight. Lines of sight will not be obscured between 24 inches and 6 feet through a triangular area adjacent to
a driveway,an alley or a street,where such access ways intersect with another street in a T-configuration. The sight visibility
triangle,or sight triangle,consists of 3 sides that are formed by 2 intersecting access ways and a line connecting the 2 (see
Apache Junction Standard Detail.AJ-27.1).
(C) Sight distance.
(1) Adequate sight distance shall be provided at all intersections,alleys and driveways(see Apache Junction.Standard
Detail AJ-26.1).
(2) The determination of whether an object constitutes a sight obstruction shall consider both the horizontal and vertical
alignment of both intersecting roadways,as well as the height and position of the object.
(3) The sight distance required varies according to traffic speeds on the through road. A designer shall provide the sight
distance based on the latest AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and submit it with the plans.
(D) ,Street slopes.
(1) Typical street cross-slope. Undivided streets should have a normal crown that is a 2-way cross-slope with the cross-
section high point on the street centerline. Divided streets should have cross-slope on each pavement section. The high point
of each slope on each pavement section shall occur on the edge of the pavement nearest to the median. Unusual conditions
may cause cross-slope requirements to vary,but normally,the desirable cross-slope is 2%,with a maximum cross-slope of 3%
and a minimum cross-slope of 1%. Any deviation from the desirable cross-slope shall be approved by the City Engineer.
(2) Cross-slopes in street dip sections. While dip sections are discouraged,where storm drainage runoff flows must cross
the street,dip sections are needed and must be approved by the City Engineer. The pavements through the dip section should
have a 1-way slope(no crown),curbing and medians must not be raised,and cut-off walls shall be installed in accordance with
MAG Standard Detail 552. Transitions back to normal street cross-slopes will be needed at both ends of the dip section.
(3) Existing cross-slope. See Vol.II, § 10-3-6(D)for street widening guidelines.
(4) Longitudinal slope.
(a) The minimum street and gutter slope for public streets is 0.0032 feet/feet(0.32%). Special approval by the City
Engineer is required for slopes less than the minimum.
(b) Projects that have any area with less than the approved minimum gutter slope shall provide construction staking on
the actual gutter alignment(not offset)at a spacing not to exceed 25 feet and have the grades checked by a city Engineering
Inspector immediately preceding the concrete pour.
(c) Grade breaks and grade changes shall be clearly noted and stationed on the grading and drainage plan and the profile
views.
(d) Projects with longitudinal slopes less than 0.32%shall have the gutter lines water-tested in the presence of and to
the satisfaction of the city's Inspector.
(5) Vertical curves. Roadways with a longitudinal grade break or grade change of greater than 1.5%shall be required to
design and construct a vertical curve along that section of roadway. Vertical curves shall be designed,at a minimum,per the
most current AASHTO guidelines.
(6) Superelevation. Although the superelevation of roadways is discouraged,unusual circumstances may require the use
of superelevation. The City Engineer must approve the use and design of superelevated roadways. Roadway drainage must be
considered in superelevated conditions.
(7) Undulating roadways. Roadways shall be designed to eliminate undulations. In the case where an existing paved
roadway undulates,it shall be removed full width and reconstructed to a new grade acceptable to the City Engineer and the
entire cost paid for by the developer.
(8) Side slopes. Side slopes should be designed for functional effectiveness,ease of maintenance and pleasing
appearance.
(a) For areas more than 10 feet from back of curb,slopes of 4:1 or flatter shall be provided.
(b) Steeper slopes may be approved in areas more than 30 feet from back of curb when soils are not highly susceptible
to erosion,or when a cut is not more than 4 feet vertical. Cuts or fills greater than 4 feet vertically shall be approved by the
City Engineer.
(E) Pavement tapers.'
(1) Projects are required to provide sufficient pavement tapers at all necessary locations(such as the'beginning or end of a
project)to properly guide traffic.
(2) The pavement section for tapers shall be per these Guidelines. See Table 10-3.1 under Vol.II, § 10-3-5 below.
(3) Pavement tapers shall be constructed with a thickened edge per MAG Standard Detail 201,Type "B."
(4) Taper length formulas: Taper length for merging traffic situations are calculated by the following formulas:
(a) When the design speed is 40 mph or less:
TL= WXS2
60
(b) When the design speed is 45 mph or greater: TL=WxS
where:
TL= Taper length in feet
S = Design speed in miles per hour. The design speed is 5 mph over the posted speed limit.
W = Width of the offset between the edge of the travel lane and the edge of the lane after the taper
(5) Taper length for non-merging traffic situation(such as where pavement widens with traffic)is normally 50 feet
minimum.However,there may be some instances when more than 50 feet of taper may be required. The requirement for a
longer taper will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the city.
(6) The Engineer shall investigate the existing conditions and if determined to be substandard,the project shall sawcut
and remove any existing pavement tapers when extending or installing new pavement improvements.
(Ord. 1282, § 3.4,passed 11-7-2006)
§ 10-3-5 STREET STRUCTURAL SECTION(AGGREGATE BASE,ASPHALT BASE COURSE AND ASPHALT
SURFACE COURSE).
(A) Flexible pavement. The flexible pavement street structural section for public streets shall be the minimum depths
shown below.
€r.-------------. .........,,"uRFm'E: TREATMENT
.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
i
:4:r_
i
� 4's
w m
i
e "r
r I"M t'
i
......... ......
.:..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Table 10-3.1 -Street Structural Section(Minimum Depths)
Street Classifications Asphalt Surface Asphalt Base ABC Fill
Course(A) Course(B) (C)
Parkway 2.5 in. -A-19** 3 in. -A-19 12 in.*
Arterial 2.5 in.-A-19** 3 in.-A-19 12 in.*
Collector 1.5 in. -A-12.5** 2.5 in. -A-19 8 in.
Local Street-Residential 2.5 in. -A-12.5** 0 in. 6 in.
Local Street-Commercial and Industrial 1.5 in. -A-]2.5** 2.5 in. -A-19 8 in.
r I�:
fi
f
w,
t
Silveray at Goldfield
Market ViabilityStudy
October 2023
Prepared for:
Properties,Olsen Recker/Guadalupe
LLC
4915 E. Baseline Rd. #105
Gilbert, AZ 85234
By: Rounds Consulting Group
4450 S. Rural Rd., Suite C-220,Tempe,AZ 85282 1 Phone: 480-508-4911 1 www.roundsgpn-sulfing.com
Table of Contents
Introduction............................................................................................................................1
ExecutiveSummary.................................................................................................................2
KeyFindings..............................................................................................................................................3
MarketAnalysis Summary......................................................................................................4
General Demographic Profile and Housing Supply ..................................................................................4
Household Retail Spending Potential.......................................................................................................8
Land Use Characteristics and Access to Site.............................................................................................8
Housing Market Characteristics and Trends...........................................................................................10
Benefitsof Rezoning.............................................................................................................13
Proposed Silveray at Goldfield Project...................................................................................................14
Conclusions& Recommendations..........................................................................................15
Appendix A:Study Area Statistics..........................................................................................17
r�
Introduction
Rounds Consulting Group, Inc. ("RCG") was contracted by Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC to
perform an independent study of the viability of the property for its underlying commercial zoning and
identify the best use of the site.
The subject site is an 18-acre parcel located on the east side of Goldfield Road, south of the US 60 in
Apache Junction(Figure 1).The property is divided by Resort Boulevard into two parts,both of which have
frontage on Goldfield Road.The site is currently zoned for general commercial use(B-1),with a PD overlay
specifically designated for a hospital, office, hotel, and restaurant uses.
RCG analyzed the general economic conditions throughout the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Metropolitan
Statistical Area ("Phoenix MSA") and the City of Apache Junction. Due to varying factors discussed in the
following sections, the subject site is unlikely to develop as a "retail destination site" such as a shopping
center offering a range of retail and entertainment options.
Therefore, a 5-minute and a 10-minute drive time radius from the site was identified as the areas where
retail demand would originate from since the commercial site would be a place where consumers stop by
at rather than drive to. Figure 2 displays the boundaries for the 5-minute(red area) and 10-minute (green
area) drive time market areas.
Figure 1:Subject Site
o-
s
Source:(Plan Consulting;Google Maps
1
Figure -and - mute Drive Steady Area Boundaries
f<
4 �41 rri t{' „i�j{fir
�02
Source:Google Maps;Esri
Executive Summary
The purpose of this analysis is to determine the viability of commercial development at the subject site in
the City of Apache Junction,Arizona ("Apache Junction" or"City").
The general and local demographic profile, economic trends, consumer spending, and housing/retail
demand of the region and study areas indicate that a destination retail development (such as a mix of
well-known retailers that includes dining and entertainment options) is not viable at the site. Viable
alternative retail options include low-rise standalone retail stores such as vape/smoke shops,pawn shops,
check cashing stores, etc.
A multi-family development at the site will make for better use of the property, better serve the
community by providing additional housing options for residents, drive retail development in existing
retail corridors, and it will preserve view corridors, among others.
RCG recommends that the current site be rezoned to address the fact that destination commercial
development would not be viable because of the commercial demand in the area is low relative to
averages, limited access to the site, low traffic counts,as well as the limited development of new housing
in the area and connectivity growth for the coming decades.Alternatively,a multi-family residential rental
property would help to address the community's needs by offering diversity in the type of housing
available while supporting existing and future commercial activity, thus generating additional tax
revenues in the City.
2
The following summarizes the key findings of the viability and market demand study.
Key Findings
C The site is not conducive to commercial or retail development due to a limited number of
households surrounding the site, access is limited to Goldfield Road which ends just south of the
property,the site is surrounded by undeveloped state-owned land which also restricts any future
transportation routes to the site, and there are more viable alternatives to retail nearby (and
others as discussed).
C Additionally, because of the seasonal nature of the immediate customer base(i.e.,a large portion
of the surrounding residents do not live in the area year-round), the seasonal downtime further
adds to the lack of viability for commercial or retail development at this location.
C The study area's spending potential was reviewed to determine the potential need for additional
commercial development. The study areas' demand for various categories of retail was
significantly lower than the average. Without additional housing development, the area is
estimated to have limited growth in consumer retail demand.
C The geometry of existing Resort Boulevard significantly limits retail viability by splitting up the site
and preventing any retail from proper visibility and critical orientation to Goldfield Road. Because
the freeway is elevated at this location and the site is separated from the freeway by the Goldfield
on-ramp, there is no additional freeway visibility to compensate for this handicap to retail
viability.
C More viable commercial development is planned west of the site,further decreasing the viability
of commercial activity at the site.
E Arizona's housing cost has increased rapidly due to various factors, including population growth,
housing shortages, rising interest rates, supply chain issues, and rising construction costs. For
context,the median sales price of a home in Apache Junction was$403,456 in 2023.
E As Arizona's population keeps increasing, places on the outskirts of the larger metropolitan area,
like Apache Junction,should expect higher rates of growth than the metro area.This has not been
the case for Apache Junction in recent years due to limited housing options.
F There is a lack of multi-family housing options in the study areas and Apache Junction. Multi-
family availability is important for housing diversity, housing affordability, and providing
workforce housing to support economic development initiatives.Approximately 46.0%of housing
units in Apache Junction are single-family, 43.9% are mobile homes, and 10.1% are multi-family
homes. In comparison, 65.9%of housing units in Phoenix MSA are single-family homes, 28.4%are
multi-family homes, and 5.5%are mobile homes.
F Overall, the data presents that commercial zoning for the land is not feasible due to the area's
low traffic counts, inaccessibility, and low spending potential or commercial zoning will lead to
less desirable retail shops that would likely be in conflict with the adjacent residential uses.
3
Market Analysis Summary
A review of the general demographic profile, real estate market trends,and land use characteristics of the
region and study areas indicate that a destination commercial development (such as a shopping center)
is not viable and that the current commercial designation will lead to low-rise standalone retail shops.The
analysis also indicated that a multi-family development at the site will make the best use of the vacant
land, providing workforce housing to support business development nearby and generate additional tax
revenues for the City.
General Demographic Profile i
Phoenix MSA and the City of Apache Junction have experienced steady population growth over the last
10 years. The population of Phoenix MSA grew at an average annual rate of 1.6% from 2012 to 2022,
adding approximately 774,000 new residents. Over the same period, Apache Junction's population grew
at an average annual rate of 0.8%, adding approximately 3,040 new residents.
As Arizona's population keeps increasing, places on the outskirts of the larger metropolitan area, like
Apache Junction, should expect higher rates of growth than the metro area. This has not been the case
for Apache Junction in recent years due to limited housing options. Figure 3 depicts the slowdown in
population growth in Apache Junction compared to the Phoenix MSA.
While new housing development at the Superstition Vistas is quickly ramping up in Apache Junction,the
area surrounding the subject site is disconnected from the Superstition Vistas and is lacking diverse
housing options.
According to estimates from MAG, Apache Junction's population is expected to increase by 25.0%from
2022 to 2030. However, the current imbalance in Apache Junction's housing options could limit this
growth, especially in the east US 60 area of Apache Junction that is very different and disconnected from
the Superstition Vistas area of Apache Junction currently under development.
4
Figure 3:Annual Population Percent Change(2
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
-0.50%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Phoenix MSA City of Apache Junction
Note:Percent change represents year-over-year growth.
Source:Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity
MAG estimates employment growth from 2020-2040 in the Phoenix MSA, Apache Junction, and the 5-
minute study area. MAG estimated that employment growth will remain strong with the addition of
967,300 jobs in the Phoenix MSA, over 11,100 jobs in Apache Junction, and 2,471 in the 5-minute study
area by 2040.
Phoenix MSA City of Apache Junction 5-Minute Study Area
Year Employment Growth Employment Growth Employment Growth'
Level Rate Level Rate Level Rate
2020 2,205,800 7,860 6,068
2040 3,173,100 43.85% 18,995 141.7% 8,539 40.7%
Net Gain 967,300 11,135 - 2,471
Note:Employed in the selected area.
Source:Maricopa Association of Governments;Rounds Consulting Group,Inc.
Housing diversity is limited in Apache Junction and the surrounding areas.According to data from the U.S.
Census Bureau, approximately 46.0% of housing units in Apache Junction are single-family units, 43.9%
are mobile homes(or other similar types),and 10.1%are multi-family units,and the study areas displayed
similar proportions to the City. For context, approximately 65.9% of the homes in the Phoenix MSA are
single-family, 28.4%are multi-family, and 5.5%are mobile homes.
5
Figure 4: Percent Share of Housing Units by Structure
70 0 65.9%
60%
54.6%
50.9%
50 0 46.0%"
43.9%
40% 36.4%
34.5%
30% 28.4%
20%
12.6%
10.1% 9.9%
10 0� 5.5%
0% in
Single-Family Multi-Family Mobile Homes and Other
Apache Junchion 11 5-Minute Study Area 10-Minute Study Area 0 Phoenix MSA
Source:U.S.Census Bureau;Esri Updated Demographics,2021;Rounds Consulting Group,Inc.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, as of 2021, 17.5% of those over the age of 25 living in Apache
Junction obtained a bachelor's degree or higher, and 26.7% and 26.2% of those living in the 5- and 10-
minute study area, respectively, have obtained a bachelor's degree or higher.
This can be compared to 34.6%in the Phoenix MSA.This difference in educational attainment is a primary
contributor to the large gap between the median household incomes. Apache Junction and the 5-minute
study area report household incomes that are 29.3%and 12.0%less than the Phoenix MSA median income
as of 2021, respectively.
The data identified demand for rental housing options.The share of renter-occupied single-family homes
was 26.9%within the 5-minute study area compared to 27.5%in Apache Junction.While renter-occupied
apartments comprised 46.5% of the 5-minute study area's housing and 38.1% of Apache Junction's
housing.
The following table displays select key economic and demographic statistics of the Phoenix MSA,Apache
Junction, and the 10-minute study area. The key statistics for the 5-minute study areas are displayed in
the Appendix.
6
Phoenix M5A Apache Junction 10-Minute Study Area
Est. Percent Est. Percent Est. Percent
Total Population 4,946,145 38,311 - 90,362 -
Age
Median Age 39' - 53.5 - 49.5 -
Under 5 years 282,742 5.7% 1,602 4.2% 4,337 4.8%
5 to 24 years 1,302,328 26.3% 8,262 21.6% 17,801 19.7%
25 to 64 years 2,530,101 51.2% 16,650 43.5% 40,753 45.1%
65 to 85+years 803,974 16.3% 12,769 33.3% 27,560 30.5%
Educational Attainment
Population 25 years and over 3,361,075 30,049 - 68,208 -
Less than 9th Grade 160,529 4.8% 1,591 5.3% 5,661 8.3%
High School Graduate(includes equivalency) 751,707 22.4% 10,342 34.4°% 20,735 30.4%
Some College,No Degree 774,095 23.0% 7,662 25.5% 16,097 23.6%
Bachelor's Degree 722,528 21.5% 3,499 11.6% 12,141 17.8%
Graduate or Professional Degree 439,910 13.1% 1,767 5.9% 5,729 8.4%
Household Income
Total Households 1,777,705 - 17,334 - 38,586 -
Family Households 1,176,350 66.2% 9,947 57.4% 25,143 65.2%
Median Household Income(dollars) $69,216 - $48,917 - $64,870 -
Less than$10,000 to$49,999 593,271 31.8% 8,840 51.0% 14,200 36.8%
$50,000 to$200,000+ 1,271,943 68.3% 8,489 49.0% 24,386 63.2%
Employment Occupation(of those living in the selected area)
Civilian employed population 16 years and over 2,365,928 - 13,955 - 36,161+ -
Management,business,professional occupations 996,907 42.1°% 3,960 28.4% 14,319 39.6%
Service occupations 366,757 15.5% 2,548 18.3% 5,749 15.9%
Sales and office occupations 542,631 22.9% 3,625 26.0°% 8,353 23.1%
Construction and maintenance occupations 198,421 8.4% 2,038 14.6% 3,616 10.0%
Production,transportation,moving occupations 261,212 11.0% 1,784 12.8% 3,977 11.0%
Housing and Occupancy
Total Housing Units 1,863,195 - 17,334 - 49,504 -
Owner Occupied Housing Units 1,250,606 67.1% 13,468 77.7% 31,583 63.8%
Renter Occupied Housing Units 612,589 32.9% ' 3,866 22.3% 6,980 14.1%
Units in Structure
Single-family 1,336,503 65.9% 7,974 46.0% 24,897 50.9°%
Multi-family 576,679 28.4% 1,751 10.1% 6,194 12.6%
Mobile Home and Other 110,658 5.5% 7,610 43.9% 17,803 36.4%
Source:U.S.Census Bureau;Esri Updated Demographics,2021;Rounds Consulting Group,Inc.
7
Household Retail Spending Potential
A spending potential index represents the amount spent by households in a given area for a product or
service relative to the national average.The national average is represented as 100.
The spending potential index for the multiple categories within the immediate study area (i.e., 5 minute
drive) have a spending potential index that is significantly lower than the national average. This means
that the spending potential within a 5-minute drive from the site is relatively low, thus commercial
demand is lower than average.This is also generally true for the 10-minute study area.
The future projections of consumer spending in the areas are estimated to have moderate growth over
the next 5 years and beyond without increasing rooftops.This indicates that if the site remains zoned for
commercial development,it will remain vacant or be developed as less desirable low-rise standalone retail
due to low demand.The spending potential index for each given study area is shown in Appendix A.
Land Use Characteristics and Access to Site
Currently, Goldfield Road ends roughly half a mile south of the US 60, and the area consists of a majority
of lower-density residential land uses.The nearby area has limited rooftops due to the state-owned land
that will limit new rooftop growth and access to the site for decades.
Additionally,the site does not have any plans for a transportation route to act as a connectivity path with
other nearby areas,and plans for a future north-south freeway interchange will draw commercial activity
away from the Goldfield area. These factors significantly lower traffic counts in the area, reducing the
viability of commercial development for this site.
Multi-family properties, however, can be developed without depending on nearby rooftops or sufficient
traffic, and are more attractive when the site has highway access to nearby employment centers.
Therefore, a multi-family residential project is clearly more viable due to its proximity to US 60 and
compatibility with surrounding communities.
Overall,the data presents that commercial zoning for the subject site is not feasible due to the area's
low traffic counts, inaccessibility, high percentage of seasonal residents, and comparatively low
spending potential.
The following images illustrate that the location of the subject site and the varying factors hindering
commercial development.
8
Retail Needs Rooftops
Goldfield Has Very Limited
b� Fe
3 mographk Trade Area:
l o Density,Mountains,
F
a
State Trust land
st,
No cann"Ovft
path of
p 5
comma 'u4
9
#4
r
1
� � „.•. fi�t�1Fl 0W roffib
o ';,. R t� �➢` t�� 'i: � - S 'fib ket
bz
Rbt �x {Y•�{i4$4C13�8 r fA%1',tE'EIAiYffS fill y$'t.....
` firer$1$5t�9`ai y rr t.t,
v
Source:Ran Consulting
t e e+w t FtE crteere FIorth South freeway
I I e FeeW VAII Drmaw
ordal AtVvIty Away
7 ram S+o4dfleld
t 4 I
1 }r,
Y
d
3 t
i }
��Id�S l�esl»ial�tm ely �are� # r�p�� �i
i38rSEtM�Lcrt3t$$t�tk�t$1 kt3llty ,,"�y�;t��t �;,+
trlt tf�k�•C`aa�a��fPo!!LtiSta le�f3xGEt+b ir�t8+t�#��8s�t°t'SU#�} f,'1��K� �
„
Source:Man Consulting
9
MarketHousing r
The demand for residential housing in Arizona has outpaced supply, resulting in a rapid increase in home
prices due to the recent influx of residents.
The current surge in home prices can be traced back to the Great Recession of 2008 and was amplified by
the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the housing crisis of 2008, developers significantly reduced the
construction of new homes for an extended period.
The Phoenix MSA economy thrived in 2019 and recovered from the pandemic induced recession more
rapidly than other metros in 2020,attracting many people seeking job opportunities and affordable living.
Due to the large migration of new residents, housing inventory shortages started driving home prices up
quickly.
Lower-income households were disproportionately affected by the rapid increase in housing costs. The
majority of the job losses included occupations that earned a wage less than $60,000 a year. However,
high-income workers did well through the pandemic.
Additionally,the federal government overreacted by providing excessive stimulus programs and kept the
interest rates historically low for a prolonged period.The combination of low interest rates and excessive
stimulus spending put further pressure on housing prices as high-income individuals and potential
homebuyers (who were waiting for the right market conditions) seized on the opportunity to buy starter
homes,trade-up homes, investment properties, and/or second homes.
According to Cromford Associates and Redfin data,the median sales price of a home in the Phoenix MSA
was $556,1668, $403,456 in Apache Junction, and $470,250 in the 5-minute study area in 2023. The
median sales price for all residential real estate grew at an annual rate of 1.4% in Phoenix MSA, 1.6% in
Apache Junction, and 11.6%in the study area (Figure 5).
Affordability in the Phoenix MSA worsened over the previous year due to rising home prices, increased
investment capital in residential housing, and steady demand (Figure 6).The circumstance has raised the
cost of housing to levels that many cannot afford. New housing products (i.e., starter homes, trade-up
homes, multi-family, etc.) are necessary to mitigate housing shortages and affordability issues.
10
FigureAnnual Percent Change in Median Sales Prices for Phoenix MSA,
Apache Junction,and the5-Minute Study Area
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
,r
10%
5% 0
0%
2017 2018 2(A9 2020 2021 2022 2023
-5%
Phoenix MSA City of Apache Junction -5-Minute Study Area
Source:Cromford Associates LLC(data derived from residential deeds recorded by Maricopa County);Redfin
Note:The available data for the study area include the years 2018 and onward.Pervious years data is unavailable.
Figure 6; Housing Opportunity Index in the Phoenix MSA
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
O, O� Off' 0� O� O� O, Off'
ti� titi titi ti15 ti� bh y�O y1 ti1b ti� ti� titi ti�
LO 10 10 LO y0 10 LO ti0 10 LQ LO 10 10
Phoenix MSA
Note:Share of homes sold affordable to families earning the median income.
Source:NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index
The median household income in the Phoenix MSA increased at an average annual rate of 2.7%, 2.1% in
Apache Junction,and 2.6%in the 5-minute study area from 2011 to 2021 (latest available data). Over the
same period,home values in the Phoenix MSA increased at an average annual rate of 3.4%,4.7%in Apache
Junction, and 4.6% in the 5-minute study area.
11
The data shows that household incomes are experiencing growth that is slower than the rate of growth
that home values are having each year. Therefore, households are forced to spend a greater percentage
of their incomes on housing. Overall,this will cause the households over time to become cost-burdened.
Because only a small percentage of homes in the Phoenix MSA are affordable for individuals earning the
median wage, many people have no choice but to seek out rental housing or other solutions. This has
led to a surge in demand for rental properties, which has outpaced the supply growth. Consequently,
rental rates have increased, mirroring the trend in home prices and further exacerbated the need for
rental housing.
It was estimated that single-family homes made up 65.9% of the Phoenix MSA housing stock, 45.4% of
Apache Junction's, and 54.6% of the 5-minute study area in 2021, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
For context,the share of single family homes in East Valley cities,Apache Junction, and Maricopa County
are displayed in Figure 7.
Multi-family homes comprised 28.4%of all housing units in Phoenix MSA,while multi-family homes made
up 10.7% Apache Junction's housing stock and 10.8% of the 5-minute study area's housing stock. For
context,the share of multi-family homes in East Valley cities,Apache Junction, and Maricopa County are
displayed in Figure 8.
For additional context, in the Phoenix MSA, mobile homes and other housing options made up 5.5% of
the housing stock, while mobile homes and others accounted for 43.9%Apache Junction's housing stock,
and 34.5%of the housing stock within the 5-minute study area.
Figure 7s Single Family Units as a Percentage of Total Housing Inventory
100%
94.2%
90%
84.9%
80%
70% 68.9%
64.4%
0
° 54.8%
50% 45.4%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Maricopa County Apache Junction Chandler Gilbert Mesa Queen Creek
Source:United States Census Bureau(latest available data).
12
Figure m IVIulti-Eqp1j1y_gnjLs as a Percentage of Total Housing Inventory
25%
21.4%
20% 19.5% 19.5%
15%
10.7%
9.9%
10%
5%
3.2%
0%
o
Maricopa County Apache Junction Chandler Gilbert Mesa Queen Creek
Source:United States Census Bureau(latest available data).
Benefits of Rezoning
The following is a list of the key benefits of rezoning the site from commercial to multi-family residential.
C The property is located adjacent to US 60, providing future households easy access to key
employment areas as well as existing and future commercial areas within the City.
Although, the property is adjacent to the US 60, it is not viable to develop as commercial due to
its limited existing rooftops, the seasonal nature of the area residents, limited drive-by traffic,
Goldfield road ending just south of the property, and future, better located commercial
opportunities.
0111 The property is surrounded by residential housing on three sides, while the U.S. 60 covers the
remaining side. Therefore, a residential property is more compatible the area. With the region
already having an ample supply of single-family homes and mobile homes,a multi-family complex
would be a benefit to this area.
Past plans to develop a hospital center with office buildings, hotels, and restaurants has failed
because of nearby hospital development(i.e.,the Banner Health Center that is less than five miles
away) and because it would not be viable as the surrounding area lacks the necessary
demographics,traffic counts, and access.
13
F- The property has a natural desert wash with views of Superstition mountains.The wash would be
better preserved if the land is developed with a multi-family project with limited heights and
appropriate setbacks from the wash.
F_ Multi-family projects can be developed without depending solely on the surrounding
demographics, nearby housing, or traffic counts. Therefore, a multi-family residential project is
more viable and compatible with surrounding communities.
F- The proposed multi-family project introduces a new product type to the community that expands
the diversity of the City's housing stock, making it more appealing to employers as well as new
families.
C The activation of this property as a multi-family neighborhood will help build demand for
commercial services in the area which will benefit the entire community.
Proposed Silveray at Goldfield Project
The Silveray at Goldfield project is planned as an approximately 18-acre rental home residential
neighborhood consisting of about 270 units.
The northern border of the property lines up the US 60's on-ramp. The portion of the property that is
north of Resort Boulevard comprises seven different lots and has a Chevron convenience store on the
west side. South of Resort Boulevard,the property is made up of one large lot.
Neighboring the property is the Dolce Vita community,an adult multi-family development on the east and
south sides. Goldfield Road borders the west side of the property,with the Golden Vista RV Resort on the
other side.
The proposed housing project will be a unique multi-family product that lives more similar to a single-
family home.The project will feature clusters of one,two, and three homes with a maximum height of 30
feet. The units will offer an elevated level of luxury via high-end finishes, numerous floor plan options,
and attractive architecture. Each unit will include a private rear yard space, which allows for secure and
personal use for its residents,guests,and pets.About half of the units will also include an attached garage
for the resident's use.
The proposed housing units will have more similarities to a single-family home than traditional
apartments. This will allow the Silveray project to benefit the community by being compatible with the
surrounding residential areas and providing a different housing option for residents.
The multi-family project aims to activate an undeveloped lot and introduce an innovative housing option
to the area of Apache Junction. The City's current housing supply is comprised of primarily single-family
homes or mobile homes.The shortage of housing options in the city creates a lack of diversity in income
levels and lifestyles which results in a less vibrant and sustainable community. The Silveray at Goldfield
project will help address that issue and fill a community need by introducing a new product.
14
Conclusions & Recommendations
This subject site is distinctive because it is located near a major transportation corridor but has limited
traffic since the connecting road ends just south of the highway. Furthermore, the area is surrounded by
state-owned land that restricts access to the site and housing development.
While state land is developing at a rapid pace along Ironwood in southern Apache Junction, development
of state land in this area will not occur for many decades to come. Due to these factors, commercial
development has not been feasible and the site has remained vacant. Furthermore, the approved
commercial development is composed of high intensity uses that would not be compatible with the
existing surrounding residential developments.
The proposed project would offer a moderately dense multi-family product type that is compatible with
the neighboring communities and includes a significant reduction in building height better preserving the
views of the mountains. The property would bring working professionals who will be a short drive to the
regional employment areas but desire a more single-family-like lifestyle combined with the luxuries of
resort-like amenities and no maintenance responsibilities. The City as a whole would also benefit from
the proposed property as increasing the number of households will support nearby commercial activity
and generate new tax revenues.
The Phoenix MSA's housing affordability has worsened over the years due to rising home prices, large
migrations of new residents, and a housing shortage. The pandemic also had an effect on the housing
market through the combination of historically low-interest rates for a prolonged period and excessive
stimulus spending.
Lower-income households have been disproportionately affected by the added pressure on housing
prices. New housing products are imperative to mitigate the affordability issues and relieve the housing
shortages. The proposed property would offer a unique housing type that would be a feasible option for
households.
Additionally the property site does not have a connectivity path to the nearby area as Goldfield Road ends
just over a half of a mile to the south, limiting the number of cars going south of the US 60. Also, ADOT
has plans for a north-south freeway interchange to the east of the property which will draw commercial
interest away from the Goldfield interchange.
The geometry of existing Resort Blvd significantly limits retail viability on the north of that road because
it prevents retail from being oriented toward the arterial (Goldfield in this case) that is critical to retail
viability. Because the freeway is elevated at Goldfield and the site is distanced from the freeway by the
onramp,this lack of visibility is not sufficiently offset by proximity to the freeway.
Any retail north of Resort Blvd will be hidden both from Goldfield and the freeway.The site south of Resort
Blvd does have better visibility onto Goldfield. But, as explained, the lack of traffic counts and lack of
residential rooftops in the area means destination retail is not a viable option, let alone on the larger
parcel south of Resort Blvd. Furthermore, Resort Blvd splits the site up in a way that hinders commercial
or retail development, adding to the general lack of retail viability in this location.
15
Retail that is too heavily disadvantaged by location,traffic,market depth,or demographic issues can easily
degrade from desirable shops and restaurants to less desirable uses such as vape shops, cannabis, or
check cashing.Retail development is market driven and cannot be forced to work where market conditions
are not there to support it.
Although nice retail shops and/or restaurants at this location would be desirable, because of the many
market-driven disadvantages,those types of uses would not be viable at the site. Eventually any retail at
this site would likely default to less desirable uses that are presumably not the desired outcome for either
the City or the neighboring residents.
RCG recommends that the current site be rezoned to address the fact that commercial development
would not be viable because of the surrounding demographics,limited access to the site, the extremely
low traffic counts,as well as the limited development of new rooftops and connectivity restrictions.
The proposed multi family project, however, is viable, is compatible with the adjacent existing
residential uses, and would help to address the community's needs by offering diversity in the type of
housing available in the city.
16
Appendix A: Study Area Statistics
Phenix MSA Apache Junction 5-Minute Study Area
Est. Percent Est. Percent Est. Percent
Total Population 4,946,145 38,311 - 13,979
Age;
Median Age', 39 - 53.5 - 52.5
Under 5 years 282,742 5.7% 1,602 4.2% 657 4.7%
5 to 24 years 1,302,328 26.3% 8,262 21.6% 1,957 14.0%
25 to 64 years 2,530,101 51.2% 16,650 43.5% 5,885 42.1%
65 to 85+years 803,974 16.3°% 12,769 33.3% 4,808 34.4%
Educational Attainment
Population 25 years and over 3,361,075 - 30,049 - 10,683 -
Less than 9th Grade 160,529 4.8% 1,591 5.3% 374 3.5%
High School Graduate(includes equivalency) 751,707 22.4% 10,342 34.4% 2,820 ' 26.4%
Some College,No Degree 774,095 23.0% 7,662 25.5% 2,628 24.6%
Bachelor's Degree 722,528 21.5% 3,499 11.6% 1,944 18.2%
Graduate or Professional Degree 439,910 13.1% 1,767 5.9% 908 8.5%
Household Income
Total Households 1,777,705 - 17,334 - 6,360 -
Family Households 1,176,350 66.2°% 9,947 57.4% 3,988 62.7%
Median Household Income(dollars) $69,216 - $48,917 - $60,876 -
Less than$10,000 to$49,999 593,271 31.8% 8,840 51.0% 2,128 33.5%
$50,000 to$200,000+ 1,271,943 68.3% 8,489 49.0% 4,223 66.5%
Employment Occupation(of those living in the selected area)
Civilian employed population 16 years and over 2,365,928 - 13,955 - 4,985 -
Management,business,professional occupations 996,907 42.1°% 3,960 28.4% 1,308 26.2%
Service occupations 366,757 15.5% 2,548 18.3% 696 14.0%
Sales and office occupations 542,631 22.9% 3,625 26.0% 1,642 32.9%
Construction and maintenance occupations 198,421 8.4% 2,038 14.6% 764 15.3%
Production,transportation,moving occupations 261,212 11.0% 1,784 12.8% 1,339 26.9%
Housing and Occupancy
Total Housing Units 1,863,195 - 17,334 - 10,377
Owner Occupied Housing Units 1,250,606 67.1% 13,468 77.7% 8,123 78.3%
Renter Occupied Housing Units 612,589 32.9% ' 3,866 22.3% 2,254 21.7%
Units in Structure
Single-family 1,336,503 65.9% 7,974 46.0% 5,671 54.6%
Multi-family 576,679 28.4% 1,751 10.1% 1,031 9.9%
Mobile Home and Other 110,658 5.5% ' 7,610 43.9% 3,585 34.5°%
Source:U.S.Census Bureau;Esri Updated Demographics,2021;Rounds Consulting Group,Inc.
17
5-Minute 10-Minute
2023 2028 2023 2028
Population 13,979 13,953 90,362 92,790
Households 6360 6351 38,586 39,628
Families 3,988 3,993 25,143 25,955
Median Age 52.5 52.7 49.5 48.8
Median Household Income $60,876 $74,361 $64,870 $77,498
Source:Esri
Spending Potential Index Average Amount Spent Total
(SPI)
Apparel and Services 72 $1,573.48 $10,007,328
Men's 77 $315,16 $2,004 412
Women's 74 $555.71 $3,534,304
Children's 67 $223,87 $1,423 798
Footwear 68 $340.46 $2,165,332
Watches&Jewelry ; 62 $105.43 $670513
Apparel Products and Services 74 $32.86 $208,969
Computer
Computers and Hardware for Home Use 73 $186.23 $1,184,446
Portable Memory 72 $3.29 $20929
Computer Software 73 $10.52 $66,896
Computer Accessories 81 $20.20 $128474
Entertainment&Recreation 79 $2,978.30 $18,941,972
Fees and Admissions 71 $502.24 $3,194239
Membership Fees for Clubs 70 $195.01 $1,240,232
Fees for Participant Sports,excel.Trips 86 $102.64 $652775
Tickets to Theatre/Operas/Concerts 74 $40.23 $255,869
Tickets to Movies 74 $20.51 $130426
Tickets to Parks or Museums 72 $20.11 $127,884
Admission to sporting Events,excel.Trips 60 $35.28 $6,998230
Fees for Recreational Lessons 61 $87.86 $4,659,093
Dating Services 56 $0.60 $3 844
TV/Video/Audio 81 $1,100.35 $6,998,230
Cable and Satellite Television Services 85 $732.56 $4,659093
Televisions 78 $113.79 $723,707
Satellite Dishes 68 $1.17 $7454
VCRs,Video Cameras,and DVD Players 77 $3.69 $23,473
Miscellaneous Video Equipment 71 $8.97 $57036
Video Cassettes and DVDs 84 $5.47 $34,767
Video Game Hardware/Accessories 68 $27 43 $174423
Video Game Software 70 $13.60 $86,487
Rental/Streaming/Downloaded Video 74 $90.82 $577 596
Installation of Televisions 72 $1.16 $7,352
Audio 74 $99.46 $632570
Rental and Repair of TV/Radio/Sound Equipment 81 $2.24 $14,272
Pets 84 $770.70 $4,901649
Toys/Games/Crafts/Hobbies 75 $119.12 $757,616
Recreational Vehicles and Fees 75 $113.39 $721180
Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment 78 $220.32 $1,401,244
Photo Equipment and Supplies 70 $32.88 $209122
Reading 81 $102.72 $653,318
Catered Affairs 55 $16.57 $105374
Food 77 $8,098.41 $51,505,918
Food at Home 78 $5,321.18 $33,842709
Bakery and Cereal Products 77 $681.30 $4,333,061
Meats,Poultry,Fish,and Eggs 78 $1,146.75 $7,293349
Source:Esri
18
Spending Potential Index Average Amount Spent Total
(SPI)
dairy Products 79 $523.10 $3,326915
Fruits and Vegetables 78 $1,041.34 $1,041.34
Snacks and Other Food at Home 79 $1,928.68 $1,928.68
Food Away from Home 75 $2,777.23 $2,777.23
Alcoholic Beverages 77 $516.09 $516.09
Financial
Value of Stocks/Bonds/Mutual Funds 71 $27,983.29 $27,983.29
Value of Retirement Plans 75 $105,847.08 $105,847.08
Value of Other Financial Assets 79 $6,790.30 $6,790.30
Vehicle Loan Amount Excluding Interest 79 $2,872.67 $2,872.67
Value of Credit Card Debt 75 $2,357.86 $2,357.86
Health
Nonprescription Drugs 87 $14855 $944792
Prescription Drugs 89 $326.38 $2,075,751
Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses 78 $86.59 $550722
Home
Mortgage Payment and Basics ' 76 $9,823.72 $62,478887
Maintenance and Remodeling Services 84 $3,194.65 $20,317,996
Maintenance and Remodeling Materials 88 $693 17 $4,408 571
Utilities,Fuel,and Public Services 80 $4,665.07 $29,669,835
Household Furnishings and Equipment
Household Textiles 76 $93.61 $595,380
Furniture 78 $641.99 $4,083085
Rugs 76 $31.83 $202,465
Major Appliances 83 $439.00 $2,792024
Housewares 89 $85.20 $541,844
Small Appliances 76 $55.39 $352278
Luggage 76 $10.95 $69,659
Telephones and Accessories 75 $8031 $513 341
Household Operations
Child Care 58 $298.37 $1,897640
Lawn and Garden 84 $560.65 $3,565,756
Moving/Storage/Freight Express 85 $76.42 $486031
Housekeeping Supplies 82 $768.53 $4,887,869
Insurance
Owners and Renters Insurance 84 $657.90 $4,184,267
Vehicle Insurance 81 $1,755.74 $11,166492
Life/Other Insurance 77 $531.39 $3,379,641
Health Insurance 84 $4,150.44 $26,396 829
Personal Care Products 77 $426.60 $2,713,183
School Books and Supplies 75 $100.97 $642151
Smoking Products 82 $356.21 $2,265,511
Transportation
Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases 78 $2,366.82 $15,052,983
Gasoline and Motor Oil 80 $2,033.38 $12,932313
Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs 82 $1,070.37 $6,807,577
Travel
Airline Fares 74 $342.99 $2,181,430
Lodging on Trips 74 $533.82 $3,395 121
Auto/Truck Rental on Trips 74 $58.30 $370,761
Food and Drink on Trips 75 $418.95 $2,664544
Source:Esri
19
Wa ® aaa a a® a a ® s<
Spending Potential Index Average Amount Spent Total
(SPI)
Apparel and Services 80 $1,759.18 $67,879,565
Men's 85 $349.59 $13,489343
Women's 82 $614.86 $23,725,017
Children's 78 $258.50 $9,974583
Footwear 76 $380.63 $14,686,825
Watches&Jewelry 71 $119.98 $4,629371
Apparel Products and Services 80 $35.62 $1,374,427
Computer
Computers and Hardware for Home Use 82 $210.85 $8,135,880
Portable Memory 82 $3.73 $143807
Computer Software 82 $11.66 $449,887
Computer Accessories 89 $22.27 $859143
Entertainment&Recreation 87 $3,277.78 $126,476,348
Fees and Admissions 82 $585.61 $22,596166
Membership Fees for Clubs(2) 81 $224.72 $8,760,980
Fees for Participant Sports,excel.Trips 97 $115.64 $4,4462162
Tickets to Theatre/Operas/Concerts 83 $45.44 $1,753,386
Tickets to Movies 87 $24.02 $926975
Tickets to Parks or Museums 86 $24.04 $927,446
Admission to Sporting Events,excel.Trips 70 $40.74 $1,571812
Fees for Recreational Lessons 76 $110.32 $4,256,978
Dating Services 64 $0.69 $26444
TV/Video/Audio 88 $1,185.98 $45,762,292
Cable and Satellite Television Services 90 $772.50 $29,807 610
Televisions 86 $125.36 $4,837,095
Satellite Dishes 78 $1.34 $51822
VCRs,Video Cameras,and DVD Players 85 $4.10 $158,389
Miscellaneous Video Equipment 80 $10,09 $389 200
Video Cassettes and DVDs 94 $6.16 $237,619
Video Game Hardware/Accessories 77 $30.90 $1,192278
Video Game Software 79 $15.23 $587,499
Rental/Streaming/Downloaded Video 84 $104.00 $4,013,123
Installation of Televisions 81 $1.30 $50,234
Audio(3) 83 $112.78 $4,351846
Rental and Repair of TV/Radio/Sound Equipment 80 $2.22 $85,575
Pets 89 $816.22 $31,494675
Toys/Games/Crafts/Hobbies(4) 84 $133.82 $5,163,603
Recreational Vehicles and Fees(5) 81 $124.89 $4,818980
Sports/Recreation/Exercise Equipment(6) 83 $261.03 $10,071,944
Photo Equipment and Supplies 80 $37.86 $1,460 818
Reading(8) 89 $111.83 $4,314,885
Catered Affairs(9) 84 $20.55 $792,986
Food 83 $8,907.01 $343,685,723
Food at Home 93 $5,794.82 $223,598965
Bakery and Cereal Products 81 $740.98 $28,591,332
Meats,Poultry,Fish,and Eggs 88 $1,245.03 $48,040814
Dairy Products 86 $568.56 $21,938,302
Fruits and Vegetables 85 $1,136,18 $43,840 482
Snacks and Other Food at Home(10) 86 $2,104.08 $81,188,034
Food Away from Home 84 $3,112.18 $120,086758
Alcoholic Beverages 84 $567.27 $21,888,721
Financial
Value of Stocks/Bonds/Mutual Funds 79 $31,115.37 $1,200,617,687
Value of Retirement Plans 84 $118,519.28 $4,573,184828
Value of Other Financial Assets 85 $7,285.25 $281,108,490
Vehicle Loan Amount Excluding;Interest i 89 $3,252.57 $125,503 496
Value of Credit Card Debt 82 $2,601.32 $100,374,620
Source:Esri
20
Spending Potential Index Average Amount Spent Total
(SPI)
Health
Nonprescription Drugs 93 $159.12 $6,139632
Prescription Drugs 93 $341.70 $13,184,658
Eyeglasses and Contact Lenses 84 $93.96 $3,625596
Home
Mortgage Payment and Basics ' 87 $11,198.19 $432,093181
Maintenance and Remodeling Services 94 $3,589.68 $138,511,373
Maintenance and Remodeling Materials 97 $761.73 $29,392 244
Utilities,Fuel,and Public Services 87 $5.052.50 $194,955,651
Household Furnishings and Equipment
Household Textiles 85 $104.05 $4,014,873
Furniture 87 $715.70 $27,615923
Rugs 85 $35.19 $1,357,885
Major Appliances 92 $483.69 $18,663501
Housewares 88 $94.82 $3,658,861
Small Appliances 84 $61.20 $2,361401
Luggage 87 $12.42 $479,125
Telephones and Accessories 83 $89.27 $3,444670
Household Operations
Child Care 71 $386.17 $14,206214
Lawn and Garden 90 $605.85 $23,377,216
Moving/Storage/Freight Express 93 $83.77 $3,232475
Housekeeping Supplies 89 $832.51 $32,123,397
Insurance
Owners and Renters Insurance 92 $715.04 $27,590,635
Vehicle Insurance 89 $1,924.44 $74,256363
Life/Other Insurance 85 $588.80 $22,719,445
Health Insurance 90 $4,465.62 $172,310 366
Personal Care Products 85 $470.40 $18,150,923
School Books and Supplies 85 $114.08 $4,402033
Smoking Products 84 $364.15 $14,051,263
Transportation
Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases 88 $2,645.68 $102,086,220
Gasoline and Motor Oil 87 $2,214.46 $85,447r005
Vehicle Maintenance and Repairs 89 $1,170.23 $45,154,587
Travel
Airline Fares 85 $394.08 $15,205,781
Lodging on Trips 84 $605,30 $23,356 274
Auto/Truck Rental on Trips 84 $66.57 $2,568,839
Food and Drink on Trips 84 $472.18 $18,219562
Source:Esri
21
City ofApache Junction
Development Services Department
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 23, 2024
CASE NUMBERS: P-23-63-Pz & P-23-64-GPA
OWNERS: Jason Barney and John Hartman,
Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE: Greg Davis, Iplan Consulting Corporation
REQUEST: P-23-63-PZ: Proposed Rezoning of approximately
18 acres from General Commercial by Planned
Development ("B-1/PD") (Ordinance No. 1144)
and B-1/PD (Ordinance No. 1146) to High
Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned
Development ("RM-2/PD")
P-23-64-GPA: Proposed Major General Plan
Amendment to redesignate approximately 18
acres from Commercial to High Density
Residential
LOCATION: The property is generally located near the
Southeast corner of US-60 and Goldfield Road
GENERAL PLAN/
ZONING DESIGNATION: Commercial; currently zoned B-1/PD
SURROUNDING USES: North: US-60;
South: Manufactured Home Park ("MHP") (Dolce
Vita) ;
East: MHP (Dolce Vita) ;
West: Recreational Vehicle Park by Planned
Development ("RVP/PD") (Golden Vista RV
Resort) .
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
1
BACKGROUND
There are currently two (2) planned development Ordinances which
govern the subject property. Ordinance No. 1144 (PZ-09-00) applies to
the six (6) parcels north of Resort Blvd. (APNs : 103-01-0110, 103-01-
0130, 103-01-0140, 103-01-0150, 103-01-0160, 103-01-0170) . This
ordinance was approved in 2000 and permitted the development of a
commercial project consisting of a gas station/convenience mart,
hotel, restaurants, medical or office buildings and retail shops .
Ordinance No. 1146 (Case PZ-13-00) governs the one (1) parcel south of
Resort Blvd. (APN 103-01-0180) . This Ordinance was also approved in
2000 and permitted the development of the Apache Junction Medical
Center, a 60-bed hospital campus including a single-level emergency
unit and central lobby, a 3-story main hospital unit and medical
office building on either side of the lobby, and a helipad on the
northwest corner of the property.
The only development that came to fruition was a gas
station/convenience mart, located on APN 103-01-0120, which is not
part of this rezoning/major general plan amendment request. All seven
(7) parcels that are part of this request are currently undeveloped.
PROPOSALS
P-23-63-PZ Is a Planned Development (PD) Rezoning request by Greg
Davis with Iplan Consulting, representing the property owner, Jason
Barney with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC, to rezone
approximately 17 . 96 acres from General Commercial by Planned
Development ("B-1/PD") (Ordinance No. 1144) and B-1/PD (Ordinance No.
1146) to High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned
Development ("RM-2/PD") near the SEC of the US-60 and Goldfield Road.
The subject site is proposed to be developed with approximately 270
rental units to be known as Silveray on Goldfield.
P-23-64-GPA Is a proposed Major General Plan Amendment of APNs 103-01-
0110, 103-01-0130f 103-01-0140, 103-01-0150, 103-01-0160, 103-01-0170
and 103-01-0180, located near the Southeast corner of Goldfield Rd.
and US-60, from Commercial to High Density Residential (40 du/ac) .
PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS
Relationship to General Plan:
The subject site is designated by the city' s General Plan as
"Commercial".
The proposed use constitutes a Major General Plan Amendment from the
land use type "Commercial" to "High Density Residential" . The change
of use is considered a Major Amendment due to the subject size being
over 10-acres in size.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
2
Zoning/Site Context:
The approximate 18-acre property is surrounded by residential
properties on the west (Golden Vista RV Subdivision) , east and south
(Dolce Vita Manufactured Home Park) and US-60 on the north.
Planned Development Zoning:
The developer is requesting one (1) deviation from the Zoning
Ordinance. They are requesting a 12-foot reduction in the rear setback
from 20' to 8' to better organize the units on the northeastern corner
of the project due to the existing wash corridor.
Infrastructure Improvements:
The surrounding infrastructure for the project is substantially
developed, however, there are certain offsite improvements that are
being requested by the City Engineer.
The four curb returns along the intersection of Goldfield Road and
Resort Boulevard and Chevron Gas Station shall be updated to current
ADA standards . Also, concrete sidewalk shall be added from the north
existing access drive heading north to tie into the existing sidewalk
located within the Arizona Department of Transportation ("ADOT")
right-of-way.
Resort Boulevard is an existing roadway that was developed at the time
of development of the Dolce Vita community. This roadway is
substandard in size and, as such, will remain a private road and will
not be dedicated as public right-of-way.
Furthermore, all other necessary on-site and off-site improvements,
such as community amenities, retention basins, accessible routes, and
landscape buffers, will be built at the time of development. Please
see project narrative to see a detailed list of all proposed
infrastructure improvements .
Availability of Water:
The subject site is not being developed as a subdivision and, as such,
is not required to obtain a 100-year certificate of assured water
supply through the Arizona Department of Water Resources ("ADWR") ,
however, this project is under the jurisdiction of the Apache Junction
Water District and has been reviewed by their Staff to ensure that
there is enough water available to serve the project.
For context, the District has what is known as a "Designation of
Assured Water Supply" issued by ADWR. This means that the District has
proved it has enough capacity/supplies to serve water up to a certain
point. As development occurs, they track the water usage and report
annually to ADWR. This is different from the Arizona Water Company
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
3
who does not have this designation. As such, The Arizona Water Company
places the burden of proving there are enough water supplies on the
developer to obtain a certificate of assured water supply from ADWR.
Public input:
Neighborhood meeting notification letters were sent from the applicant
to all property owners within a 300-foot radius . The applicant hosted
multiple neighborhood meetings regarding this project.
The first formal Public Neighborhood Meeting was held on 10/24/23 at
the Golden Vista RV Park. Approximately 90+ individuals were in
attendance. Most of these individuals were residents of Golden Vista.
Another meeting was held on 11/06/24 at Dolce Vita Community Meeting.
This meeting was well attended by Dolce Vita Residents, as this
meeting was held during their weekly meeting.
Staff received multiple emails, as well as a protest petition from
primarily residents located within Golden Vista, regarding the
rezoning request. All emails and the petition have been attached to
this report.
Primary concerns that were discussed during the meetings and within
the emails to Staff include the availability of water, traffic, road
improvements, and concerns regarding the height of the development and
its impact on view sheds.
FINDINGS OF FACT
As required by the Apache Junction Zoning Ordinance, a Planned
Development request may be approved by the City Council after
consideration has been given to three different criteria. The criteria
is outlined in the text below:
1 . That a better design cannot be achieved by applying the strict
provisions of the underlying zoning district.
Applicant Response: The current zoning is specific to the development
plans for a regional hospital and commercial uses which are no longer
market viable at this location. Furthermore, maintaining the B-1
underlying zoning would allow the introduction of land uses that are
incompatible with a residential neighborhood in terms of height,
noise, light, odors, etc.
2 . That strict adherence to the provisions of the zoning ordinance
is not required in order to ensure the health, safety and welfare
of the inhabitants of the proposed development.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
4
Applicant Response: The proposed development plan is in strict
adherence to the zoning ordinance (RM-2) with one exception which is a
setback deviation for a small portion of the property that is adjacent
to a 50-foot wide wash, thus the distance provided still meets the
intent of the setback requirement and thus the zoning ordinance.
3 . That strict adherence to the ordinance is not required to ensure
that property values of adjacent properties will not be reduced.
Applicant Response: As aforementioned, the proposed development plan
is in strict adherence to the zoning ordinance (RM-2) with one
exception which is a setback for a small portion of the property that
is adjacent to a 50-foot wide wash, thus the distance provided still
meets the intent of the setback requirement and thus the zoning
ordinance. Furthermore, the continuation of the PD overlay use will
provide the area residents reliance that the approved plans cannot be
amended without a public hearing process. This is especially
important in terms of the proposed project density and the proposed
building height, both of which are significantly reduced from the
maximum allowed in the RM-2 zoning district.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MAJOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDEMENT
As required by the Apache Junction General Plan, a Major General Plan
request may be approved by the City Council after consideration has
been given to specific criteria. The criteria is outlined in the text
below:
1 . Whether the amendment proposes a land use designation that the
Land Use Plan Map does not adequately provide optional sites to
accommodate.
Applicant Response: Although the General Plan does provide alternative
HDR sites, many are developed and /or in areas of the City already
being served by higher density residential uses.
2 . Whether the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the
General Plan, will not solely benefit a particular landowner or
owners at a particular point in time, and is consistent with the
overall intent of the 2020-2050 General Plan.
Applicant Response: The Commercial land use classification of the
subject property was specific to a previous plan which proved to be
non-viable and other than one parcel developing as a fuel station, the
rest of the site has remained vacant. The proposed amendment to a
residential use will activate this property, bringing in a housing
product that will benefit the community and residents that will spur
additional economic growth in the area. The proposed amendment is more
consistent with the quieter character of the neighboring communities,
thus more compatible from a general Plan perspective. Since Commercial
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
5
land is significantly more valuable, the amendment does not solely
benefit the land owner and instead benefits the community which is
consistent with the intent of the General Plan.
3 . Whether the proposed amendment is justified by an error in the
2020-2050 General Plan as originally adopted.
Applicant Response: The proposed amendment is justified by a change in
how commercial development occurs and is not tied to an error of the
General Plan. The commercial market has adapted to the post-COVID
world of fewer commercial centers and the clustering of uses in
regional nodes versus on "every street corner". That change in market
has made sites like this better suited for other land uses such as the
HDR proposed.
4 . Whether the proposed change is generally consistent with goals,
objectives, and other elements of the 2020-2050 General Plan.
Applicant Response: As demonstrated later in this narrative, we
strongly believe the proposed change is consistent with the goals and
objectives of the General Plan. The proposal is also consistent with
the adjacent properties which share the same HDR classification.
5 . Whether the proposed change is justified by a change in community
conditions or neighborhood characteristics since adoption of the
Plan.
Applicant Response: Yes, as aforementioned, this property has proven
to be non-viable for the current Commercial classification and in
analyzing other land uses available, the HDR designation is the most
appropriate given the surrounding land uses.
6. Whether the amendment will adversely impact a portion of, or the
entire community by:
a. Significantly altering acceptable existing land use
patterns, especially in established neighborhoods .
Applicant Response: The proposed HDR classification is more compatible
with the established neighborhoods, many which also utilize the HDR
land use designation. Furthermore, the Commercial designation and
specifically the approved hospital use would certainly adversely
impact this quiet residential area via the regular high levels of
noise and light caused by ambulances & helicopters coming and going.
b. Significantly reducing the housing to jobs balance in the
Planning Area.
Applicant Response: Although a Commercial classification is more
associated with jobs, that only matters if the property can be
developed under that land use designation. The commercial
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
6
classification (and commercial zoning) has been in place for almost 25
years and only produced one small fuel station. it is clear the
property would continue to sit vacant producing no jobs for the
foreseeable future. The HDR classification will allow the property to
be developed immediately, create a handful of jobs, but more
importantly, will provide a housing product for employees that not
only will help the City attract employers, but also will spur economic
growth in this otherwise under-developed part of town.
c. Substantially decreasing existing and future water
supplies.
Applicant Response: The proposed HDR classification and resulting
residential community will use significantly less water than the
current Commercial classification and approved uses would.
d. Replacing employment with residential uses.
Applicant Response: As previously mentioned, this site, although
currently designated for commercial use, is not viable and will remain
vacant. Developing an HDR land use will help bring people here and
will likely spur economic and job growth in the area by activating an
otherwise vacant property.
e. Requiring additional and more expensive improvements to
infrastructure systems and/or proximity to municipal
facilities and/or services than are needed to support the
prevailing land uses and which, therefore, may impact the
level of service for existing and proposed developments in
other areas .
Applicant Response: As an infill parcel, this site is already served
by adequate infrastructure which means the City will bring in more
revenue on systems already in place, increasing their efficiency.
Furthermore, the proposed HDR land use will actually use LESS
utilities than the Commercial approved land uses would producing lower
stress levels on the City's infrastructure systems.
f. Increasing traffic (without mitigation measures) on
existing roadways beyond the planned level of service, and
that negatively impact existing and planned land uses .
Applicant Response: Although Goldfield Road sees very little traffic
today, it is an arterial street that is designed to accommodate
significantly more traffic. The traffic study prepared for the
proposed HDR land projects an acceptable LOS (Level of Service) ,
meeting the City's guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed amendment
actually reduces the traffic load on the area streets by over 70o from
the projected traffic of the currently approved Commercial land uses.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
7
g. Affecting the existing character (i.e. , visual, physical
and functional) of the immediate area.
Applicant Response: The surrounding area is largely residential with a
hybrid rental/ownership home community to our east and south (Dolce
Vita) and an RV community to our west (Golden Vistas) , both of which
have the same HDR land use classification that is proposed for the
subject property. As such, our low intensity rental home community is
consistent with the character of the area and may even enhance the
built aesthetics. The current Commercial designation would
significantly change the character of the area as hospitals, office
buildings, and hotels are large blocky structures that would look
foreign to the area and block view corridors.
h. Increasing the exposure of residents to aviation generated
noise, safety and/or flight operations.
Applicant Response: This proposal does not have an aviation component,
but also does not generate the noise, light, and potential safety
issues that a commercial development might. The current Commercial
classification included a hospital complex that likely would have a
helicopter service which would expose residents to aviation noise,
safety, and/or flight operations.
i. Materially diminishing the environmental quality of the
air, water, land, or cultural resources .
Applicant Response: The proposed HDR classification will result in a
development that is much more sensitive to the environmental quality
of the area than the current Commercial classification would allow for
as we are building a neighborhood for families to live in which
-requires a longer-term vision in terms of the environment for our
residents.
j . Significantly altering recreational amenities such as open
space, parks, and trails.
Applicant Response: The current Commercial classification and approved
plans make no mention of recreational amenities whereas the proposed
HDR land use heavily focuses on recreational amenities for the
residents which is detailed in the concur-rent PD Rezoning application
package.
PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 26,2024
On the meeting of the 26 1h, Staff made a presentation and introduced
the preliminary recommended conditions of approval for the Planned
Development Rezoning and Major General Plan Amendment. The applicant
also made a presentation and answered questions asked by the
Commission.
,Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
8
Eight (8) residents of Golden Vista Resort spoke during the meeting.
Their primary concerns included:
1 . The two-story height of the development
2 . Water pressure concerns
3 . Increased density
4 . Property value concerns
5 . Maintaining commercial land
6. Increased traffic
PLANNING DIVISION PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff is supportive of the proposed project due to the enhanced
features such as the building elevations, community amenities and
overall site design, however, it is Staff' s recommendation that a
portion of the property remain commercial for a future use.
Per the City Council and resident adopted General Plan, the subject
site is currently designated commercial. As Staff reviews each
proposed development within the City, we use the General Plan as a
guide for our recommendations .
Throughout the review of this project, and with the guidance of the
General Plan, Staff noted a few primary factors that make this
property a candidate for commercial use.
1 . US-60 Freeway Frontage:
Commercial businesses look for highly visible and easily
reachable locations to attract and serve potential customers. The
northern six (6) parcels (+/- 6 acres) are located directly south
of the US-60 . Not only are these properties visible from the
freeway, but they have full access to the freeway allowing easy
access to the site.
2 . Recent Rezoning Trends and Concerns :
Staff is cognizant of both the Planning and Zoning Commission' s
and City Council' s hesitation to rezone commercial property to
residential. While providing a diverse housing stock is important
to diversify the City' s population, the City relies heavily on
sales tax since the City does not have a property tax.
This is especially important to point out now that the City will
no longer be able to collect rental tax as of 2025. This means
that the City will only be able to collect a one-time development
fee during construction from a residential rental product. While
the City will benefit from the additional residents living within
the City, there is no guarantee that these residents will spend
money within Apache Junction.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
9
3 . North-South Corridor:
The proposed North-South Corridor is expected to connect to the
US-60 just east of the proposed Silveray development. This
connection will travel south and connect to the SR-24 and
continuing to Arizona Farms South. This new roadway will connect
this area of Apache Junction with communities further south and
provide additional traffic to the area, which is needed for
successful commercial development.
4 . Location of Future Commercial:
During an internal study of commercially zoned properties back in
2021, Staff discovered that, while we have a similar amount of
commercial land in comparison to nearby municipalities, much of
our commercial land is not located within an ideal location for
development.
There are three commonly referred to types of commercial
developments:
1 . Neighborhood, which is typically spread throughout the
community and provides services to the local population
in the form of retail, office and other similar services.
2 . Community, which is typically located near major
intersections and typically accommodates a larger size
development. An example of this type of development would
be the Fry' s Marketplace at the northeast corner of Idaho
Road and Old West Highway.
3 . Regional commercial developments tend to be located near
freeways or major arterials to have access to high
traffic counts and visibility and are the largest
commercial developments . An example of this type of
development would be the Tempe Marketplace located near
the southwest corner of the Loop 202 and Loop 101 in
Tempe, AZ .
Many of our existing commercial properties are considered
neighborhood commercial and our availability of land to
accommodate community commercial developments is becoming
increasingly limited. Many of our existing, undeveloped
commercial properties are not located at highly trafficked
intersections and are not an adequate size to accommodate a
community, or regional, development.
Throughout the review process, Staff expressed the need to keep
at least a portion of this area as commercial based on the
location of the property along the US-60 . Staff is recommending
that at least 5 acres of land be reserved for a commercial use,
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
10
but we have not designated a specific area to allow flexibility
in the site design. A 5-acre property could reasonably
accommodate a community commercial development.
Respectfully, Staff recommends to the Commission that they
include the following conditions of approval as part of a
favorable recommendation to the City Council. As always,
Commissioners may recommend changes or additional conditions
which they feel will improve the development plan.
RECOMMENDED MOTION FOR P-23-64-GPA
(Major General Plam Amendment)
I move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the
Apache Junction City Council the (APPROVAL/DENIAL) of General
Plan Amendment Case P-23-64-GPA, a request by Jason Barney and
John Hartman with Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC (developer) ,
represented by Greg Davis of Iplan Consulting Corporation
(applicant) , to redesignate 18 acres, located near the Southwest
corner of US-60 and Goldfield Road, from "commercial" to "high
density residential . "
RECOMMENDED MOTION FOR P-23-63-PZ
(Planned Development Rezoning)
I move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the
Apache Junction City Council the (APPROVAL/DENIAL) of Planned
Development Rezoning case P-23-63-PZ, a request by Jason Barney
and John Hartman with Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC
(developer) , represented by Greg Davis of Iplan Consulting
Corporation (applicant) , for an approximate 270 for-rent single-
family residential community to be named Silveray, generally
located near the Southwest corner of US-60 and Goldfield Road,
from General Commercial by Planned Development ("B-1/PD") and B-
1/PD to High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned
Development ("RM-2/PD") , subject to the following conditions of
approval :
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1) All the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance are applicable to
this case.
2) The development shall reflect substantial compliance and
consistency with the Planned Development presented with case
P-23-63-PZ, P-23-64-GPA and P-23-65-DR incorporated by
reference herein, and as otherwise specified through these
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
conditions of approval, to include site layout, elevations,
setbacks, public and private rights-of-ways, easements and
tracts, amenities (including proposed pool and clubhouse) ,
perimeter and interior lot separation walls, model types,
landscaping and other improvements.
Landscape, screening and irrigation improvements, planted
within a minimum 10-foot-deep strip inside the net property
line (but outside of required walls) along the perimeters of
the property, shall be provided in compliance with the city' s
landscape and screening requirements contained in Apache
Junction City Code, Volume II, Land Development Code, Chapter
1, Zoning Ordinance, Article 1-8, Landscape Regulations . All
required trees shall be 24" box and all required shrubs shall
be 5-gallon in size and a decorative 6-foot-tall wall shall be
constructed on all roadway frontages.
Street improvements include but not necessarily limited to,
extension of pavement and the provision of sidewalk, curb,
gutter, streetlights, underground utilities, fire hydrants,
landscaping shall be required as part of this planned
development project, and subject to review and approval by the
City Engineer.
All applicable permits shall be applied for and plans shall be
designed to current city codes prior to any lot grading or
construction on the lots. Inclusively, all applicable
development fees, including public art fees, shall be paid at
the time of permit issuance. Development fees shall be paid on
a per unit basis.
6) All common areas, amenity areas, and tracts within and
immediately adjacent to the proposed development, including
perimeter walls and fences, and interior and exterior common
area landscaping, shall be owned and maintained in good
condition at all times by the owners or homeowners association
of the proposed subdivision.
7) The developer' s engineer shall meet the civil engineering
improvement plans and document requirements, as outlined in
the previously provided pre-application and review comments
and in accordance of the City' s approved engineering standards
that are in effect at the time of plan submittal.
8) Minor PD modifications or alterations of the approved
architecture designs, floor plans, open space, unit mix, unit
count, clubhouse location or development plan, shall be
administratively reviewed and approved by the Development
Services Director or designee.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
12
9) Major deviations or proposed changes from the original plans
associated with this case will require a Major PD Amendment.
The Director or designee shall interpret the proposed
modification to be significant/major if, in the Development
Services Director or designee' s opinion, the modified project
density (i.e. , units per acre) is proposed to be increased by
more than 100, the quality of project design is diminished,
the types of proposed land uses are significantly altered
and/or the overall character of the project is contrary to the
intent and spirit of the original City Council PD ordinance
approval.
PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1) The applicant shall reserve, at minimum, 5 acres of contiguous
land for General Commercial ("B-l") development.
2) The permitted uses in the B-1 zoning district shall be those
which are permitted by Zoning Ordinance, Article 1-5, Section
1-5-3 : Non-Residential Use Regulations, except that the
following uses shall not be permitted herein:
Motor vehicle dealer (new or used vehicles; and similar uses) ;
Thrift store/used merchandise sales;
Medical marijuana facilities and dual licensees;
Swap meets;
Tattoo and/or piercing services;
Death care services/funeral homes;
Commercial parking lots and garages;
Check cashing stores;
Psychiatric and substance abuse facilities;
Nursing and residential care facilities;
Homeless shelter;
Community food and relief services;
Commercial equestrian boarding, rentals, arenas and academies;
Cemeteries/mausoleum.-
Scenic and sightseeing terminal/parking;
Assisted living facility;
Group care home;
Multi-family residential (including apartments, condominiums or
townhouses) ;
Similar uses designated by the Development Services Director not
conducive to the City' s and community' s goals and objectives for
successful community commercial development.
3) The proposed project must submit a Site Plan and Design Review
Application for the revised residential and proposed
commercial site for review and approval by Planning Department
Staff.
4) The maximum height for the site shall be limited to 30-feet.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
13
5) A reduced rear setback of 8' shall be permitted on the parcels
north of Resort Boulevard.
6) The proposed development will not be age-restricted.
7) Resort Boulevard will remain a private road and will not be
dedicated as public right-of-way.
8) The City will transfer ownership, maintenance, and payment of
all existing streetlights along Resort Boulevard to the
adjacent property owners/commercial homeowner' s association.
9) The four curb returns along the intersection of Goldfield Road
and Resort Boulevard and Chevron Gas Station shall be updated
to current ADA standards.
10) Concrete sidewalk shall be added from the north existing
access drive heading north to tie into the existing sidewalk
located within the Arizona Department of Transportation
("ADOT") right-of-way as outlined by the City Engineer.
11) Any other future improvements to existing public facilities in
Goldfield Road will be per city standards and as requested by
the City Engineer.
Ke4i?�ySchaWnik
Prepared by Kelsey Schattnik
Senior Planner
Attachments:
Exhibit 1 - Project Narrative
Exhibit 2 - Site Plan
Exhibit 3 - Elevations and Floor Plans
Exhibit 4 - Landscape Plan
Exhibit 5 - Wall Plans
Exhibit 6 - Final Participation Report
Exhibit 7 - GPA External Agency Responses
Exhibit 8 - Resident Emails to Staff
Exhibit 9 - Updated Protest Petition (3.20.24)
Exhibit 10 - Vicinity Map
Exhibit 11 - Traffic Impact Analysis
Exhibit 12 - Markey Study (applicant)
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
April 23, 2024 - Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report
14
RESOLUTION NO. 24-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT CASE P-23-64-GPA, A REQUEST BY JASON BARNEY
AND JOHN HARTMAN OF RECKER/GUADALUPE PROPERTIES LLCS,
REPRESENTED BY GREG DAVIS OF IPLAN CONSULTING
CORPORATION, FOR A MAJOR LAND USE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT
TO REDESIGNATE APPROXIMATELY 18 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF US-60 AND GOLDFIELD ROAD, FROM "COMMERCIAL"
TO "HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" .
WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction General Plan was
adopted, pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes ("ARS") § 9-461 . 06
Adoption and Amendment of General Plan; Expiration and
Readoption; and
WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction General Plan, Chapter
13 : Amending the General Plan, also defines a major amendment to
include : "Any proposed land use map change from a commercial,
business park, or industrial land use designation to a
residential land use designation of 10 or more contiguous
acres"; and
WHEREAS, the City of Apache Junction General Plan, Chapter
13 : Amending the General Plan, states that changes to the
general plan are to be considered major amendments if the
resulting change is a "substantial alteration of the
municipality' s land use mixture or balance as established in the
land use element"; and
WHEREAS, proposed map amendment case P-23-64-GPA for the
18-acre property and the proposed companion rezoning case P-23-
63-PZ for the same 18-acre property, both fall within the
definitions of requests requiring a major general plan
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Apache Junction Planning and Zoning Commission
on March 26, 2024 and on April 23, 2024, held public hearings
regarding P-23-64-GPA, and on April 23, 2024, voted to recommend
approval of case P-23-64-GPA by a vote of 4 : 3; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has complied with the
requirements for the preparation and adoption of a general plan
amendment pursuant to ARS § 9-461 . 06; and
RESOLUTION NO. 24-09
PAGE 1 OF 4
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the action taken on
this general plan amendment is necessary for sound and orderly
community development, for the preservation of community values
and for the promotion of the general health, safety, convenience
and welfare of the citizens of Apache Junction; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also finds the amendment:
1) Proposes a land use designation that adequately provides
optional sites to accommodate .
2) Constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan,
will not solely benefit a particular landowner or owners at
a particular point in time, and is consistent with the
overall intent of the 2020-2050 general plan.
3) Is justified by an error in the 2020-2050 general plan as
originally adopted.
4) Is generally consistent with goals, objectives, and other
elements of the 2020-2050 general plan.
5) Is justified by a change in community conditions or
neighborhood characteristics since adoption of the general
plan.
6) Will not adversely impact a portion of, or the entire
community by:
a. Significantly altering acceptable existing land use
patterns, especially in established neighborhoods .
b. Significantly reducing the housing to jobs balance in
the planning area.
c. Substantially decreasing existing and future water
supplies .
d. Replacing employment with residential uses .
e . Requiring additional and more expensive improvements
to infrastructure systems and/or proximity to
municipal facilities and/ or services than are needed
to support the prevailing land uses and which,
therefore, may impact the level of service for
existing and proposed developments in other areas .
f. Increasing traffic (without mitigation measures) on
existing roadways beyond the planned level of service,
and that negatively impact existing and planned land
uses .
g. Negatively affecting the existing character (i .e . ,
visual, physical and functional) of the immediate
area.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-09
PAGE 2 OF 4
h. Increasing the exposure of residents to aviation
generated noise, safety and/or flight operations .
i . Materially diminishing the environmental quality of
the air, water, land, or cultural resources .
j . Significantly altering recreational amenities such as
open space, parks, and trails .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THAT:
Case P-23-64-GPA, a general plan land use plan map
amendment request by Jason Barney and John Hartman of
Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC, represented by Greg Davis of
Iplan Consulting Corporation, to redesignate approximately 18-
acres at the southeast corner area of US-60 and Goldfield Road,
from "commercial" to "high density residential, " be approved and
adopted for the following generally described property:
Parcel 1 (103-01-0110) : LOT 1 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 2 (103-01-0130) : LOT 3 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 3 (103-01-0140) : LOT 4 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 4 (103-01-0150) : LOT 5 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 5 (103-01-0160) : LOT 6 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 6 (103-01-0170) : LOT 7 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 7 (103-01-0180) : LOT 8 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ON THIS DAY OF F 2024 .
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF 2024 .
RESOLUTION NO. 24-09
PAGE 3 OF 4
WALTER "CHIP" WILSON
Mayor
ATTEST:
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RICHARD J. STERN
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 24-09
PAGE 4 OF 4
r Y
Major General Plan Amendment
Rezoning
Project Narrative
Submitted to:
City of Apache Junction, Arizona
Submitted on behalf of:
Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC
4915 E. Baseline Rd. #105
Gilbert, AZ 85234
Prepared by:
Iplarn Consulting
rt,
1,}
3317 S. Higley Road, Suite 114-622
Gilbert, AZ 85297
October 2023
Purpose of Request
This narrative accompanies a request for formal application review of a Major General Plan
Amendment (GPA) and a Planned Development (PD) rezoning for approximately 18 acres of
vacant land located on the east side of Goldfield Road,immediately south of US60 within the City
of Apache Junction. The property has an existing General Plan land use classification of
Commercial and a zoning designation of B-1/PD which is proposed to be changed respectively to
a classification of High Density Residential (HDR) and zoning designation of RM-2/PD (multi-
unit residential) for the purpose of replacing the current PD development plan of a hospital
complex along with offices, hotels, and restaurants, with a proposal for an approximately 15
DU/acre rental home residential neighborhood of 271 units (Site Plan currently shows 269 units
but site can accommodate up to 271 units subject to an easement abandonment which is currently
underway).
Site Aerial
r a
i
e �
• s s � zt x m#s t 7z � �i tlxa �� � p��y};�1 ' �
Location
The subject property is bifurcated by Resort Boulevard into two parts which both front on to
Goldfield Road. The northern part is located immediately south of the on ramp for US60 and
contains seven separate parcels. The southern part is located south of Resort Boulevard and is
comprised of one large lot. The entire northern boundary is comprised of ADOT right-of-way for
US60. To the east and south is the Dolce Vita community which is an active adult multi-family
development. Goldfield Road is our western boundary with the Golden Vista RV Resort beyond.
Also to our west is the existing Chevron gas station and convenience store.
Surrounding Property Information
Direction General Plan Desi nation Zoning Existing Use
On-Site High Density Residential RM-2/PD Vacant
North - - US 60 R/W
South High Density Residential MHP Dolce Vita Community
East High Density Residential MHP Dolce Vita Community
West High Density Residential RVP Golden Vista RV Resort
We believe this property is ideally located for a multi-unit residential land use as it is in close
proximity to US60 and the multiple services and employment nodes along it. In addition, this
product type provides a great land use transition for the Dolce Vita and Golden Vista communities
as it is a significantly less intense use that what the current zoning allows for, resulting in
significantly less traffic and better preservation of view corridors.
Description of Proposal
The intent of this proposal is to both activate this otherwise overlooked and underdeveloped parcel
and to bring a unique housing product to the City of Apache Junction that is needed. Currently,
the City's housing stock is comprised of either single family homes or traditional apartments. The
dearth of other housing types creates a lack of diversity in both lifestyle and income levels. The
proposed Silveray product helps address that issue by introducing a new product type into the
community that will fill an existing need for residents that want the lifestyle akin to that of a single-
family home or townhome but not the long-term time/cost commitment or maintenance that comes
with it. Residents also benefit from the resort level amenities and lock/leave ability that this
product and project provides. This will be a market-rate, non-age-restricted project that can serve
all members of the community.
Access:
Not only is the product unique,but so is the site as it is bifurcated into two parcels that span Resort
Blvd. which will provide the main points of access to this project. Both sides of the project are
proposed to be gated and will have multiple points of ingress/egress along Resort Blvd. The north
parcels currently each show two points of ingress/egress and two second points of egress only,
however all four access points permit emergency ingress. The southern parcel features the primary
access from Resort Blvd. to the community clubhouse and leasing office which is outside of the
gated area. The entry drive then continues on through a gated access that allows for both ingress
and egress into the site. A secondary point of connection provides egress to Goldfield Road and
also serves as an emergency vehicle access point.
Circulation &Parking:
Once through the gates, the 26-foot, or wider, driveways circulate through the property providing
access to all of the residential units and parking areas. The current unit count and mix result in a
parking requirement (established by the City of Apache Junction Zoning Code) of 496 spaces
which we intend to exceed via a mix of private garages, shaded car ports, and open parking spaces.
The parking ratios are based upon anticipated product mix for the site, which currently includes
95 one-bedroom units, 102 two-bedroom units, and 77 three-bedroom units. The parking ratios
are 1.5 spaces/unit for the one-bedroom units, and 2 spaces/unit for the two and three-bedroom
units for a blended ratio of 2.2 spaces/unit and a total space count, including garages, of 496
parking spaces. It is intended that 25%of the garages will provide enhanced electrical connection
for residents with electric vehicles.
Bicycle and pedestrian access is provided at all of the vehicular points of access but also in multiple
other locations connecting residents directly to Resort Blvd. and Goldfield Road. The north
parcels are compact and do not need additional points of access, however five additional access
points are spread throughout the south parcel making it convenient for residents to exist the
community safely. A total of fifty bicycle parking spaces are provided in the project via garage
and designated bike racks around the site.
Open Space &Amenities:
As a high-quality residential community, the site will offer an elevated level of site amenities for
the residents including the primary amenity area which features a clubhouse community building
with fitness center, swimming pool with a large sun deck, spa, ramada, grilling areas, and more.
Additional amenity areas feature a game lawn, two dog parks, and several walking paths with
shade trees and multiple benches. The location of the primary amenity will be at the north end of
the south parcel which affords centralized access from all residential units. The amenity area
411) a g c 1 p ian Co n s u itin (
location also enhances the streetscape along Resort Blvd. Additional passive parks will be
provided and linked by walking paths the circulate throughout the project. In all, there is almost
three acres of open space which equates to over 15% of the net site area.
Product:
The residential homes themselves offer an elevated level of luxury via high end interior finishes,
numerous floor plan options, and attractive architecture. Although there is quite an eclectic mix
of architecture in the area, the intent of this project is to blend into the more single family feel of
the community which is why our homes use materials and roof structures similar to that seen in
traditional single-family neighborhoods. We are using materials that stand up to the harsh
environmental conditions in the desert including stucco, stone,metal, and concrete tile, and utilize
colors that are complimentary to beautiful desert environs. Sloped rooflines and articulated
massing complete the robust and complimentary architectural design for the project.
Departing from traditional large monolithic multi-family buildings containing multiple units, this
project features smaller cluster of one, two, and three units which have a maximum height of two-
stories all under 30-feet tall. These smaller units look and live more like a traditional single-
family home than traditional apartments thus are much more compatible to the adjacent HDR
communities. Similar to a single-family home, every unit at Silveray includes a private rear yard
space that allows for private and secure use by the residents, guests, and their pets. In addition,
almost half of the units offer attached garages which is also something more akin to single family
homes versus traditional multi-family apartments.
Compatibility with adjacent uses
This property is unique in several ways. First, although it is adjacent to US60, it is a difficult
property to develop due to limited access and extremely low traffic volumes due to Goldfield being
a dead-end street. The previous concept of a hospital complex, office buildings, hotels, and
restaurants were a grand vision that is simply not viable at this location due to lack of surrounding
demographics and traffic counts. A multi-family residential project is much more viable here as
it can utilize the proximity to the highway but still be compatible with the existing residential
communities surrounding it. Multi-family uses also do not rely on area demographics or traffic
counts. Furthermore, being immediately adjacent to an important highway corridor leading to
critical employment areas provides an important housing opportunity for the city. The site being
51Page 1i lan Consulting
bifurcated by a private street serving another community affords some design challenges which
we believe have been successfully mitigated by the more single-family nature of the product type.
Additionally, this property is blessed with a beautiful natural desert wash and some of the most
spectacular views of the Superstition mountains in the valley, both of which are better protected
by developing a lower intensity multi-family project with limited heights and appropriate setbacks
from the wash than the current zoning would allow for. The hospital, hotel, and restaurant uses
that would come with the existing zoning would bring much higher vertical structures disrupting
those views for some of the neighbors, especially to the west. In addition, those uses would bring
much more intense traffic and congestion to Goldfield but most of all to Resort Boulevard, the
primary access for the Dolce Vita residents. The proposed land use change would limit traffic to
this area to people who live there as opposed to the existing land use which would draw a constant
flow of people from elsewhere. This makes the proposed use much more compatible with the quiet
residential character currently being enjoyed by neighboring communities.
The site is bordered on three sides by existing residential uses, making this proposal compatible
from a land use perspective. In addition, the building configuration (1-3 units per structure),
building height (less than 30-feet), and design result in a single-family look and feel which is
complimentary to the adjacent projects.
Traffic:
The site fronts onto Goldfield Road which is a fully improved arterial level road within the city
and can easily accommodate the existing traffic volumes in addition to the traffic generated by this
proposal. The proposed change in land use will actually reduce the potential traffic generated from
the existing proposed uses as identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the site:
0 The proposed development is anticipated to generate 2,038 daily trips, 124 (30 in/94 out)
trips during the AM peak hour, and 139 (89 in/51 out) trips during the PM peak hour.
0 The existing zoning of the site would be anticipated to generate 7,596 weekday daily trips,
564(388 in/ 176 out)trips during the AM peak hour, and 747 (294 in/453 out)trips during
the PM peak hour.
0 The proposed land uses generate approximately 5,558 fewer daily trips, 439 (359 in/
80 out) fewer AM peak hour volumes, and 602 (203 in/399 out) fewer PM peak hour trips
than the existing zoning allows.
6 1 P a g e 1plan Consulting
The reduced intensity of the proposal from the approved commercial land uses will also benefit
the City in terms of a lessened demand on public infrastructure,facilities,and services,all of which
are in place and have capacity to serve this project. Lastly, the Development Plan for the proposal
currently exceeds the City parking requirements which ensures there is adequate off-street parking.
Views:
This property and area is blessed with wonderful views of the majestic Superstition Mountains and
one of the many benefits of this project is the lowering of the allowable height for the property.
The current zoning allows building heights to be up to 45-feet and while the proposed RM-2 zoning
district reduces that maximum height to 40-feet, the proposed product is less than 30-feet which
we will be voluntarily committing to via the PD overlay.
The project will take advantage of the existing 8-foot wall of Dolce Vita by adding landscaping to
effectively screen our project from the adjacent Dolce Vita project to the east. A new wall will be
built along the perimeter where needed which will further screen the project. Goldfield Road acts
as a buffer to the west and a 50'+wide wash provides a buffer to the east. Additional landscaping
is proposed along the south boundary to act as a buffer beyond the existing 8-foot wall.
Noise and Light:
The proposed residential use does not contain any sources that will create atypical levels of odors,
dust, gas, noise, lighting, vibration, smoke, heat, or glare. Lighting and noise obviously will emit
from this project, but the levels of emission will be significantly less than would occur under the
currently approved land uses, especially the noise and light attributed to a hospital use. Even so,
we have prepared a photometric plan to demonstrate light level compliance with City regulations
and all community amenities will close at I Opm minimizing impacts to adjacent properties.
General Plan Amendment
The current General Plan designation of Commercial has proven to be non-viable at this location
for multiple reasons. The most damaging reason is the lack of ambient traffic in the area but
specifically along Goldfield Road. Currently Goldfield Road dead ends one-half mile to the south,
limiting the necessity of traffic to turn south of US 60. US 60 itself is a major transportation
corridor but this specific interchange has nothing immediately nearby to attract motorists to exit
which is of critical importance for the viability of the commercial uses the current zoning allows
for. Large commercial centers exist to the east(Gold Canyon)and the west(at Signal Butte)which
serve the regional needs for commercial services along US60, limiting the viability of any
7 1 P a g e IpIan Con sulti rig
commercial services at this interchange. It is possible some commercial/employment uses that do
not require high traffic volumes(e.g.mini-storage,warehousing,contractor yards,etc.)could work
here, but those uses would still prefer to be in more active areas and we believe types of uses are
not as compatible with the adjacent land uses as the residential use proposed.
Another justification for the amendment is that the Commercial classification is not as compatible
with surrounding land uses which use the same High Density Residential (HDR) land use
classification of our proposal. This area has proven to be viable for residential uses such as the
rental community of Dolce Vita to our east and south, and the Golden Vista RV park to our west.
As such,we believe changing the land use classification to HDR is more appropriate and will allow
the property to finally develop as a viable and long-term sustainable use.
Findings of Fact:
As required by the City of Apache Junction 2020 General Plan,below are the applicant's responses
to the Findings of Fact which are the criteria the City evaluates the justification of the proposed
Major General Plan Amendment from a land use classification of Commercial(C)to High Density
Residential(HDR).
1. Whether the amendment proposes a land use designation that the land use plan map
does not adequately provide optional sites to accommodate.
Response: Although the General Plan does provide alternative HDR sites, many are
developed and/or in areas of the City already being served by higher density residential
uses.
2. Whether the amendment constitutes an overall improvement to the general plan,will
not solely benefit a particular landowner or owners at a particular point in time,
and is consistent with the overall intent of the 2020-2050 general plan.
Response: The Commercial land use classification of the subject property was specific to
a previous plan which proved to be non-viable and other than one parcel developing as a
fuel station, the rest of the site has remained vacant. The proposed amendment to a
residential use will activate this property, bringing in a housing product that will benefit
the community and residents that will spur additional economic growth in the area. The
proposed amendment is more consistent with the quieter character of the neighboring
communities, thus more compatible from a general Plan perspective. Since Commercial
land is significantly more valuable, the amendment does not solely benefit the land owner
and instead benefits the community which is consistent with the intent of the General Plan.
3. Whether the proposed amendment is justified by an error in the 2020-2050 general
plan as originally adopted.
Response: The proposed amendment is justified by a change in how commercial
development occurs and is not tied to an error of the General Plan. The commercial
market has adapted to the post-COVID world of fewer commercial centers and the
clustering of uses in regional nodes versus on "every street corner". That change in
market has made sites like this better suited for other land uses such as the HDR proposed.
4. Whether the proposed change is generally consistent with goals, objectives, and
other elements of the 2020-2050 general plan.
Response: As demonstrated later in this narrative, we strongly believe the proposed
change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. The proposal is
also consistent with the adjacent properties which share the same HDR classification.
5. Whether the proposed change is justified by a change in community conditions or
neighborhood characteristics since adoption of the plan.
Response: Yes, as aforementioned, this property has proven to be non-viable for the
current Commercial classification and in analyzing other land uses available, the HDR
designation is the most appropriate given the surrounding land uses.
6. Whether the amendment will adversely impact a portion of the community by:
a. Significantly altering acceptable existing land use patterns, especially in
established neighborhoods.
Response: The proposed HDR classification is more compatible with the established
neighborhoods, many which also utilize the HDR land use designation. Furthermore,
the Commercial designation and specifically the approved hospital use would
certainly adversely impact this quiet residential area via the regular high levels of
noise and light caused by ambulances & helicopters coming and going.
b. Significantly reducing the housing to jobs balance in the planning area.
Response: Although a Commercial classification is more associated with jobs, that
only matters if'the property can be developed under that land use designation. The
commercial classification (and commercial zoning) has been in place for almost 25
years and only produced one small fuel station. It is clear the property would continue
to sit vacant producing no jobs for the foreseeable future. The HDR classification will
allow the property to be developed immediately, create a handful of jobs, but more
importantly, will provide a housing product for employees that not only will help the
City attract employers, but also will spur economic growth in this otherwise under-
developed part of town.
c. Substantially decreasing existing and future water supplies.
Response: The proposed HDR classification and resulting residential community will
use significantly less water than the current Commercial classification and approved
uses would.
d. Replacing employment with residential uses.
Response: As previously mentioned, this site, although currently designated for
commercial use, is not viable and will remain vacant. Developing an HDR land use
will help bring people here and will likely spur economic and job growth in the area
by activating an otherwise vacant property.
e. Requiring additional and more expensive improvements to infrastructure
systems and/or proximity to municipal facilities and/or services than are needed
to support the prevailing land uses and which, therefore, may impact the level of
service for existing and proposed developments in other areas.
Response: As an infill parcel, this site is already served by adequate infrastructure
which means the City will bring in more revenue on systems already in place,
increasing their efficiency. Furthermore, the proposed HDR land use will actually
use LESS utilities than the Commercial approved land uses would producing lower
stress levels on the City's infrastructure systems.
L Increasing traffic(without mitigation measures)on existing roadways beyond the
planned level of service that negatively impact existing and planned land uses.
Response: Although Goldfield Road sees very little traffic today, it is an arterial street
that is designed to accommodate significantly more traffic. The traffic study prepared
for the proposed HDR land projects an acceptable LOS (Level of Service), meeting
the City's guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed amendment actually reduces the
traffic load on the area streets by over 70%from the projected traffic of the currently
approved Commercial land uses.
g. Affecting the existing character (i.e., visual, physical and functional) of the
immediate area.
Response: The surrounding area is largely residential with a hybrid rental/ownership
home community to our east and south (Dolce Vita) and an RV community to our west
(Golden Vistas), both of`which have the same HDR land use classification that is
proposed for the subject property. As such, our low intensity rental home community
is consistent with the character of'the area and may even enhance the built aesthetics.
The current Commercial designation would significantly change the character of the
area as hospitals, office buildings, and hotels are large blocky structures that would
look foreign to the area and block view corridors.
It. Increasing the exposure of residents to aviation generated noise, safety and/or
flight operations.
Response: This proposal does not have an aviation component, but also does not
generate the noise, light, and potential safety issues that a commercial development
might. The current Commercial classification included a hospital complex that likely
would have a helicopter service which would expose residents to aviation noise,
safety, and/or flight operations.
i. Materially diminishing the environmental quality of the air, water, land, or
cultural resources.
Response: The proposed HDR classification will result in a development that is much
more sensitive to the environmental quality of the area than the current Commercial
classification would allow for as we are building a neighborhood for families to live
in which requires a longer-term vision in terms of the environment for our residents.
j. Significantly altering recreational amenities such as open space,parks,and trails.
Response: The current Commercial classification and approved plans make no
mention of recreational amenities whereas the proposed HDR land use heavily focuses
on recreational amenities for the residents which is detailed in the concurrent PD
Rezoning application package.
As evidenced above, we believe the proposed HDR land use classification not only meets the
Findings of Fact but also will be more compatible with the existing neighborhoods, will spur
economic growth in this area, and is a more appropriate land use for the property.
Zoning
Complimentary to the General Plan Amendment, we are proposing to rezone the property from
PD B-1 to PD RM-2,replacing the previous plans for a hospital complex, hotels, restaurants, and
offices with a residential project. We believe the RM-2 base zoning district is most applicable as
it aligns with the density intent of the project at approximately 15 DU/acre. The PD overlay is
proposed to highlight overall compliance with the development regulations of the RM-2 zoning
district and request one deviation which is discussed in detail in the next paragraph. Below is the
PD development standards proposed for Silveray on Goldfield.
Development Standards
Standard RM-2 Code PD RM-2 proposed
Minimum Development Area 7,000 square feet 700,000 square feet
Minimum Lot/Parcel Width 60-feet 60-feet
Maximum Residential Density 22 DU/acre 15.1 DU/acre
Minimum Area Per Unit 1,980 square feet 2,800 square feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 27%
Minimum Front Setback(West) 20-feet 20-feet
Minimum Side Setback(North) 10-feet 10-feet
Minimum Side Setback(South) 10-feet 10-feet
Minimum Street Side Setback(Resort Blvd.) 10-feet 20-feet
11 � 1' age tialan Consulting
Minimum Rear Setback(East) 20-feet 8-feet'
Maximum Height(feet) 40-feet 30-feet
Minimum Building Separation 10-feet 10-feet2
1—Not including adjacent wash corridor.
2—0-feet when attached.
We are currently identifying one deviation to the City's Zoning Code. The deviation is a 12-foot
reduction in the rear setback that only affects the northeastern corner of the project. The
northeastern parcel is severely constrained by wash corridors on both the east and west sides which
significantly restricts the buildable area of that parcel. However, since there is over 90 feet of
wash corridor buffering our property from the closet homes in the adjacent Dolce Vita community,
we believe the intent of the setback is met and exceeded in this instance. Additional justification
for the minor deviation includes our commitment to exceed compliance with many of the other
development standards, including a lowered density and lowered building height which are more
important standards to the adjacent residents. The project also exceeds the open space and amenity
requirements which enhance the livability of the project and sufficiently compensates for any
negative impact to the greater community this one deviation would have.
General Plan Compliance
As the guiding policy document for development with the City of Apache Junction, we have
reviewed the 2020 General Plan and affirm the proposed amendment is consistent with the overall
Goals identified therein. Following is an analysis of the project's compliance with the Goals of
the General Plan.
Goal 3.2 - Diversify housing stock and neighborhoods by incorporating a variety of housing
types and associated values to allow for a diverse demographic of residents.
Being one of the more outlying communities of the Phoenix Metropolitan area, Apache Junction
has historically attracted only single-family home development and as noted within the General
Plan, the existing housing stock percentages are heavily skewed that way. The proposed
development of this site as a for-rent housing community will add to the City's multi-family
inventory and help the overall diversity of both the City's housing stock and residents.
Goal 3.3-Maintain and attract a quality housing stock in condition,design and construction
standards.
121Page I an C o11sit. tin
The ownership history has a history of developing and maintaining quality commercial, industrial
and residential communities within the Phoenix metro area. The design, open space amenities,
housing diversity and quality of life built into this community achieves the stated goal.
Goal 5.1 -Attract all quality private investment that will add value and bring diversification
to current and future residents of Apache Junction as a great place to live,work and play.
Within the Economic Development Element of the General Plan, this goal is appropriately broad
to recognize that economic development contains many different components. In this case, the
private investment is expanding the housing diversity, thus employee pool, which is critical for
not only existing employers to be able to maintain their workforce, but also important for
prospective employers considering Apache Junction as their new home. This project meets this
goal on a number of different levels.
Goal 9.1 -Increase the city's financial sustainability.
Financial sustainability is helped tremendously by increased residential density and diversity.
Assuring sufficient disposable income through attainable housing choices, as well as increasing
the number of people in the immediate trade area, the City is well served financially by the
development of this project.
Goal 9.3 -Encourage infill development.
As a strategic piece of land located between an existing community and the US60, this property is
an infill property. It can be difficult to identify the proper balance of uses in an infill location,but
this site creates a density transition between existing commercial and residential, and takes
advantage of the proximity to a major transportation corridor which might negatively impact other
land uses.
Goal 9.4- Support and foster sustainable growth.
Sustainable growth is a term that relates to housing diversity, financial sustainability, economic
development contribution, and the overall goals of creating a city favorable to a live, work and
play environment. This goal is met on all accounts.
Goal 11.2 -Provide a balance of uses throughout the community.
From the General Plan:
131Pa g e 1plan C otisLiiting
"Currently, the city has less multi family and single-family residential homes per capita than
Queen Creek, Chandler, Gilbert or Mesa.A highly disproportionate percentage of current housing
stock resides in manufactured/recreational vehicle homes which currently totals approximately 63
percent (63%) of the city's residences. As a result, only 27 percent (27%) of the city's housing
stock is considered single family development. As young people grow out of their parent's home it
is important to have a diversity of housing types in order to keep new generations within the city.
Moreover, the lack of diversity in housing stock also has a direct effect on people being able to
move into the city. The general plan addresses this concern through appropriate land use
designations and housing policies. "
As noted above, this product is critical to help achieve the overall balance of uses the community
needs.
Goal 11.4 -Encourage and promote sustainable land use development.
As identified under the Sustainable Growth Goal, there are many components to sustainable land
use development. Providing an appropriately dense housing project along a major transportation
corridor reduces traffic in the community and creates a density transition away from the traffic and
other commercial uses. This project, and multi-family projects in general, also result in higher
efficiencies of utility infrastructure due to the focused intensity/density and bring a higher ratio of
customers per capita resulting in a higher level of sustainability for the public utility providers.
Conclusion:
This property is unique as it is close to a major transportation corridor, but is somewhat isolated
by the lack of transportation network to the south or east. For those reasons,the current entitlement
failed to become viable. The property ownership has analyzed this site and larger context and
believe this infill property's highest and best use is as a multi-family development. Even so, it is
important to take the adjacent mobile home park and RV park communities into account and
develop a project that is compatible both in land use and design. We are proposing a lower
intensity product type that we believe it is compatible to the adjacent communities due to its lower
height buildings and single family livability. Furthermore, this product is designed to attract
working professionals that need to be a short drive into the regional employment areas,but desire
a more single family like lifestyle combined with no maintenance responsibilities and resort like
amenities which make this a complimentary development for both the adjacent neighbors and the
City as a whole.
Within the Phoenix metropolitan area, the shortage of housing quantity and variety is having a
significant detrimental impact on communities' ability to grow in an economically viable fashion
due to a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the inability of employers to find quality
housing for new employees relocating to the Valley. If a community wants to develop in a smart
and sustainable way, they need to have a range of housing to address affordability and lifestyle
choices. This project will help achieve that goal for Apache Junction.
15 111 a g e 1plan ` onsafitiri
DEVELOPMENT DATA
GOLDFIELD
ZONING: DENSITY:
CURRENT: B-1 PD 1 BEDROOM 85 REQUIRED: PROVIDED:
PROPOSED: RM-2 PD 2 BEDROOM 107 Northeast (PARCEL 3)
CASE: P-23-63-PZ 3 BEDROOM 77 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 TOTAL --------------- BTR
cc
SECTION: 23 TOTAL 269 1 BEDROOM: 1.5(63)=95 1.5(22)-33 1.5(0)= 0 Garage 15 SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
o Resident-ADA Covered 1
Q TOWNSHIP: 01N 2 BEDROOM: 2(72)= 144 2(35)= 70 2(0)= 0 _ ___ __________
q m 13'-9" 12'-6" 19'9" 11'$" 12'-6" 19'9" 11'8" 12'-6" 19'9" 1 V-8" 12'-6" 19'9" 12'-8" 13'-9" °O 20'-6"
o w ___ - -- _ --- - --- --- _ - --__-.-- _-- o w _-- _ RANGE: 08E DENSITY: 14.9 DUAC 3 BEDROOM: 2(52)= 104 2(10)= 20 2(15)= 30 Resident_Covered 3
RESORT BLVD
-
— .— � _ _ _ �j _ � _ _ _ �-� _ _ o — — _ — — APN. 103-01-0110 103-01-0130 103-01-0140
TOTAL. 343 123 30 496 Resident-Tandem 13
� _ —� -
103-01-0150 103-01-0160 103-01-0170 _. _ __ ___ APACHE JUNCTION ARIZONA 85219
- - - - - _ _ _ _ Visitor 21
TYPE 4 ; - o o 103-01-0180
Visitor-ADA 1
_. >
(2-STORY)! t
TYPE 7 TYPE 7 ' 54
TYPE 7 TYPE 7 TYPE 7 -_
a .,...TYPE 3 r � TYPE 3 ,� u J
TYPE 8 TYPE 8, TYPE 8'' TYPE 8- TYPE 8: - TYPE 8, - TYPE 8 `TYPE 8' TYPE 8 ACREAGE. 17.96 ACRES
2 STORY 2 STORY
( )
1016 (2-STORY) (2-STORY) 2 STORY _ _ + �L.
I . _ PAR EL 2 I ( ) ( ). ( ). (2-STORY) 2 STORY C L Northwest(2-STORY) 2 STORY" ' 2 STORY' 2 STORY 2 STORY (2-STORY) 2 STORY. .2 STORY' 2 STORY ( ) ( ) o
PEN SPACE: 2. ACRES 1 .0 S C 8 C S 56/0
�[1016] 80
(
h
7 '1
-- - r 2
SETBACK LOT COVERAGE. 4.8 ACRES(26.8/o) Garage 8 �*
Resident-ADA Covered 1 V
rn n rn ^'
TYPE 6 Resident-Covered 43 7
-- 24 0
PERIMETER BUILDING SETBACKS:
TYPE 1 TYPE 1 TYPE 1 TYPE 1 TYPE 1 --- (2-STORY) -
< Resident-Tandem 8
(2 STORY) ,{ 2 STORY}% > (2 STORY) 1. (2 STORY) + 2 STORY} --- _
1106 ------- 1001 1017 -- ---- --
_.
rt
� � FRONT. 20 0
t � ----- _ Visitor 62
-= ir co
SIDES: 10-0 BICYCLE PARKING: visitor-ADA ____ _____ __ 1
1302 1120 1016 —N 1011 1017 _s ,Q �A
REAR: 10'0°
143
1302 -
il
TrPE4 REQUIRED: 1 PER EVERY 10 VEHICLES ___ (PA -
1001 F3 (2-STORY) _ _ South (PARCEL 1)
( 496/10=49.6=50
C I TYPE3 PROVIDED: 10 SITE SPACES Garage 79
� ( ,, a
- (2�sTORY) 91 Resident 8
EXIT 40 GARAGE
/ S d n
. ONLY � � �Q oRvl � � � 11-5' „ �i <u 11 5 � —®® ___ �® 11302 � � Resident-ADA 2
— — — — - C
�25� TYPEa TYPEa TYPEa 1114 9c� Resident-ADA Covered 1
(2-STORY (2-STORY (2-STORY 26'0" V
34'-0° _ ' " 1011 0 1114 � / Resident-Covered 102 � T �']�
1122 �� �� - - i -- K G
_ .: 1126 1208 EXIT -— ----- L L �..J
Resident-Tandem 50
EXIT ONLY
-- -------- - _.
Visitor 73
m0 2 ® .W.W 37-
ONLY — --
e —_ - — — —
Visitor-ADA 4
----� _ _ _ _ World H ORBArch . com
o �2s°�� - q ¢ o - 319 Q
� RESORT BOULEVARD w 0 TOTAL PROVIDED 516
o-
�/1Lu
1114 = = �� 1125 1106 (PRIVATE PAVED ROAD) � <
. .
RF�caRC��TF�
2
1124 '
° � _ _ UNIT MIX. o
\ �QeR�� / PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 TOTAL 1 � —
EXCEPTION \ r? �2s0' / 1 BEDROOM: 63 22 0 ( Ric Barbe
2 BEDROOM: 72 35 0 12 22 2 3
3 BEDROOM: 52 10 15 gfP
V 1208 �. . . . . . ; / 269 qR� 5 P.
TOTAL. 187 67 15
Expires 3/31/2026
1017
LEASING t RE
r' r
LEGEND KEYNOTES
��� / q
\; a , 9'x 18'STALL
1001 TYPICAL PARKING STALL
►�� DENOTES PROPERTY LINE
J0021201 1002 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL, MIN. 1 V x 18'STALL
1011 1011 BICYCLE PARKING
S�2/ 0 1016 24'WIDE INTERIOR DRIVEWAY
DENOTES ACCESSIBLE PARKING 1017 5'-0"WIDE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO PARKING
—0 __ --- '" �33 / 1018 4'-0"WIDE DETACHED MEANDERING SIDEWALK
w 1017 - o ��eE 1001 c ° ° // 1019 TYPICAL TANDEM PARKING STALL, 9'x 18'STALL. STRIPING PROVIDED TO PREVENT
- - _—_ o A s��R�� Q 1123 FIRE HYDRANT ENCROACHMENT INTO WALK AISLE.
/
1106 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKL
1114 VEHICLE ACCESS GATE
TYPE
_ (2-STORY) / DENOTES ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 1120 DENOTES CARPORT STRUCTURE LOCATION
_i- / 1121 PEDESTRIAN GATE AND ACCESS TO PUBLIC WAY
1
1122 MAIL KIOSK
������ o 'PE2QtRVI
W ! ( TYPET C� tl S�0
W Q 11'-6 TYPE? 11'9" (2_sloRvl �2s�0R l2. 1106 / / 1 BEDROOM UNIT
1123 TOT LOT
(2 STORY) � / / 1124 GAME LAWN
_ - _
1 BEDROOM 0 2 / DROOM UNIT OVER GARAGES 1125 RAMADA WITH BBQ
1
G� _V / Q DOG-
J J TYPE 2, TYPE 2 TYPE 2 T{PET o ® CiQ oR l ®/ 12016 POOLPARK
0 m (2-STORY) TYPE? (2-STORY) ® ® ,(2-STORY) (2STORV) �2S
(2-STORY) - - � TYPES / 2 BEDROOM UNIT 1208 DECORATIVE PAVERS OR EQUIVALENT
- (z-STORY) 1301 DOUBLE REFUSE ENCLOSURE WITH DOUBLE FULL HEIGHT SET OF GATES
I o, 1302
3 BEDROOM UNIT 1302 SINGLE REFUSE ENCLOSURE WITH FULL HEIGHT SET OF GATES
TYPE
1405 EXISTING STREET LIGHT,TYPICAL
PE 1 l2.STORY) / S'Fj�q 0',
4 -STORY)' 1120 < / �/r
b
1302 1302
E 1017 Ell
TYPE 5
( TYPE 5
2-STORY ® . (2STORY /
®. 4"X8"X16"SOLID CAP
I
LOOP STEEL PIPE,PAINT
TO MATCH DE6378"JET'
1777 35 $" 8"DECORATIVE CMU,
TYPE 3 a TYPES - SEE DETAIL 2 THIS SHEET STEEL EMBED PLATE, -----
(2-STORY) (2STORY /�
Sr, 9 ��
'' `o WELD LOOP TO PLATE
I
" CONCRETE SLAB OR -
I
° rYPE4 1016 1 4 Ell SIDEWALK PER PLAN
%. '
(2-STORY) TYPE 2 I I TYPE 2 j 1
_._..... t .'(2-STORY),[ I :-Y , (2-STORY). 'f TYPE 5 '- " 18'-0"
1121 __ - DECOMPOSED GRANITE i
(2-STORY) 1 6
4 0" 19'9" 9 9" �9'9"� 19 9
----
SETBACK 1016 Lt STEEL DECKING,PAINT
TYPE 1 TYPE 7 TYPE 7 _ TYPE 7_ TYPE 7 TYPE 1 - a TO MATCH DE6212
(2-STORY) ° (2-STORY) (2-STORY) (2-STORY) (2-STORY) (2-STORY) -'
% 6"DIA.STEEL PIPE „
'', � rn CRISP MUSLIN
1124 BOLLARD FILLED W/ ___.
- CONCRETE.PAINTED -- — -
T11 YPE 5 rn rn -- --------- --------- --------- ---- --------- ------------------
1405 �� I - ----- _—_' - -- - - � I _� � � � � � � � � � � � LU � � � � � � � � � � � � � � STEEL BEAM AND
(2-STORY) a - TO MATCH WALL COLUMN,PAINT
50'-0"R.O.W. - DEET6 0"DOLPHINOTALES"H
TYPE 2 1 TYPE z o LOOP STEEL PIPE,PAINT
(2-STORY),1 (2-STORY)) TYPE 5
CONCRETE SLAB TO MATCH DE6378"JET"
16 6"THICK,4000 PSI, STEEL EMBED PLATE, Lu
= rn (2 STORY)
JL
3/4"AGGREGATE W/ WELD LOOP TO PLATE z
o ®o� a3 to 6x6-10/10 WWM OR LANDSCAPE AREA z
0 1120 0. );
TYPE z 4 bo s TYPE z o Q EQUAL.SLOPE TO SIDEWALK PER PLAN PER PLANS w
o (2-STORY) (z-STORY}y DRAIN 1l$"PER FOOT DECOMPOSED GRANITE
i ® TYPE E -_- ��, '•'- �; 1019 % CURB&
(2-STORY) 19'9" 9'9" . . 112'-0" SIDEWALK
�_
I
1018 ,.
TYPE 1 o TYPE 7 TYEll
PE 7 '� � TYPE 7 TYPE 7 'rs TYPE 1 i n, a' ° .; �. � a ° I -- I ® L.. I --
a a 20 0 _
2 STORY 2-STORY 2-STORY 2-STORY 2-STORY 2-STORY - _ c -
177
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) TYPE 5 -
< . (2-STORY SETBACK _
-I '- ---
a ,a
- - - —
- 18---0„ 6„ 5'-0,
1121 —� __ APPROXIMATE LOCATION CO - , �, , 4° �_ _ CONCRETE FOOTING PER CONCRETE HEADER
I
OF ADJACENT BUILDING ( _ MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
„ �TYPE2.i ..I" TYPE2:.1
. 1
(z-STORY (2STORY)
- - 1 t U
16 0"P.U. TYPESa ° (-
r^ o
(EASEMENT (2-STORY) � .° o�
. .°.
< m 1120 - 11 26'-0" 1'-0"
-EASEMENT12"DIA.x 24"DEEP
,k 1017 . .-. �-.
TYPE 3
,� / �, TYPES _ TYPE 14'-0"� CONRETE FOOTING
2-STORY), (2-STORY) f (2-STORY
® `
1011
EXIT 1017 0 1018 1001
ONLY 1106 - 1302 1016 N 1301 o
_ 4,0„ ( o TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL GROUND MOUNTED BIKE RACKS CARPORT CANOPY
MENC
TYPE 1, TYPE 1 ❑1 = 8
-- ---- -- ----
1121 ( �(2-STORY), `(2-STORY) r f -�- ��'- --
r ' Orr H
1126 SETBACK `� NOT TO SCALE
20'-0" - PRE-CASTLu
SETBACK °F g = °p CONCRETE CAP q �
® /
C TYPE 7 ' TYPE 7 ;' G -
° a (2 STORY) (2 STORY) 26 0„
--- TYPE 3 ih TYPE 2, TYPE 2 TYPE 2
TYPES (2-STORY)' o (2-STORY} 1g (2-STORY) o (2-STORY), �iS�M�NT Q " ACCESSIBLE RQUTE
(2-STORY)
> o n
_'
TYPE 7 TYPE 7 METAL GATE - _
> I i gym_ � w -�- 1
< (2-STORY) (2-STORY) _ : / BEYOND c�
_ , _ �, ui
SUPERSTITION FREEWAY
> 77W_ --- ---- �__ _ T __ _� __=_1__ _
o m 8"x8"x16"DECORATIVE CMU Ui
o
N SIDE ELEVATION WALL,SEE NOTES 1 AND 2
I I " APPROXIMATE LOCATION � 9
FOR SPECIFICATIONS O O ----------- SITIr
OF ADJACENT BUILDING S -----
MOTHER LODE DR
6"CONCRETE CURB --_
PRE-CAST 3"x23"VIEW SLOT IN GATE
LANDSCAPE ISLAND CONCRETE CAP 10'0"AT SINGLE ENCLOSURE
o N 19'-4"AT DOUBLE ENCLOSURE
-----�
BASELINE AVE
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN -
l 1 30 60 120
-- - \�
SCALE: 1"=60'-0"
SOLID METAL - - ---- STEEL ENLCOSURE GATE n
DECKING,COLOR TO o VICINITY MAP
BE DUNN EDWARDS � i �
DE6378"JET"
4"WIDE PAINTED
PARKING STRIPES
L]i
PROVIDE SLOTS AT OPEN o RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
R3'0" &CLOSED GATE POSITION
TO RELIEVE CANE BOLT
................... DATE: DECEMBER 22,2023 ORB #: 23-206
9,0„ FRONT ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN
TYPICAL
Al 01
1. SMOOTH FACE CMU BASIS OF DESIGN TO BE ECHELON STANDARD MASONRY SMOOTH FACE IN COLOR"ASPEN"
2. SPLIT FACE CMU TO BE ECHELON STANDARD MASONRY SPLIT FACE BLOCK IN COLOR"BLACK MOUNTAIN"
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
PARKING STALL WITH ISLAND REFUSE ENCLOSURE
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BTR
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
/0'2
3.04
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
---------"COOL DECEMBER" ----------------------------------------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
96-3 DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
00� 39'-11 564" D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Ri ry L
-------- DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS-"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
> < El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
< E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
<
< F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
< ----—----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES."SIERRA MADRE"
/T!ml -------------------------------------------------------
I"fi
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES,AVONDALE BLEND
----------
A ----------------——----------
---------------------
---------------------------
A H < H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
DE6378 "JET" ►
COMMUNITY FLEX SPACE < ti
OFFICE FR
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET" .� a
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
T-"
H "JET"
< ----------- ---—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
< - World HQ@ORBArch . com
<
LEASING
cD RED CY/
------- \
CLUBHOUSE T.O. ROOF 9-
K. . . . . . . < BREAK ROOM < 22'-10"
K <
< < 1 13
o K < < Ric Barbe
a >�(0 < <
09 28 2
co MECHANICAL K STORAGE OFFICE < <
>
A3.04 > < < Y-A
< ed.
< � -
< 3 zo A,
> << 04 Cf Expires 3/31/2026
<
< CLUBHOUSE T.O. PLATE
<
7< Cp
<
<
MAINTENANCE
<
CLUB ROOM
<
LEVE
< 77777'
<
FITNESS
BUSINESS
77777 CENTER
> IL
< III 1 4' 8' 16'
> < > CLUB HOUSE FRONT ELEVATION
> EMNE]
> SCALE: 1/8" 1%0"
77<
U?
CLUBHOUSE T.O. RO
OF10
CLUBHOUSE T.O. PLATE''
rt
1 V-6"
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16' tr
CLUB HOUSE FLOOR PLAN 11�,VIVIVIVIVIVIV
E]
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
LEVEL Ll ...............
0 011
OPEN
4" 12" 4" 12" 1 1 � 16'
F - --1 CLUB HOUSE BACK ELEVATION 0,1 4' 8'
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
L - - - - - - - - -j CLUBHOUSE T.O. ROOF
4" 12" 22'-10"
----------------
CLUBHOUSE T.O. PLATE_Au-�
1 V-6"
4" 12"
LEVEL Ll
............. o,-o,,
4" 12"
CLUB HOUSE RIGHT ELEVATION 0,1 �4' 8' 16'
3 F-1 El
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
J CLUBHOUSE T.O. ROOF
T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - —��
22'-10"
(h
4" 12" 4" 12"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Is I
it I
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLUBHOUSE T.O. PLATE
1 V-6iti
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...........
fJ
RE-ZONING UBMITTAL
LEVEL Ll
01
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
CLUB HOUSE ROOF PLAN 0,1 1 1 �4 �8' 16'
6 MENU OPEN -
SCALE: 1/8" 1%0"
A
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
CLUB HOUSE LEFT ELEVATION
4
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
CLUBHOUSE
mmmmlu
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
— '-'COOL-DECEMBER" ——-—-----—--------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
3.14
Cl STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
Dl STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
Z 28'-0" -T_-7/ DE6376 LOOKING GLASS"------------_ ot Pd Ch
----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gl FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
——-—-- ---------------------------------------------------
Ns Ll G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES--"AVONDALE BLEND__ __ H GARAGE DOOR TO E3E PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
> S T,
TORAGE: DE6378 _JET
> I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
> J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
r4k-N = /3 11JET_ -—-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\A3.14 > --------------------—-------------------;.I —----- N3.14al W o r I d HQ@ORBArch . com
>
C? > <
>
> GARAGE GARAGE F7- GAUGE -�RED-ARC,�l
\cD - /T
I CAT Fc
1 13
Ric Barbe
09 28 2
S1 ned.
Z 0-A,
MAi 71 :2 Expires 3 31 2026
34'-3"
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmou
FLOOR PLAN — LEVEL Ll o'l 1 1 �4' 81 16'
5 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
36-T
/--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------34'--3liilliilliilliil
IF
EMEND.
>
>
BEDROOM ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O. PLATE�
2 4tt
20,_4
0' "
Xfr
tr
i.
cl?)
cli
oq > < C4 zo
> <
> UNIT C LEVEL L�� LEVEL L2
,
> <
>
0_4 10'-4"
> <> C�l
> 6'SCREEN WALL
>
> <
>
>
1A LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
----------
ol---- —-------
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 o'l 1 1 �4' �8' 16' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' FRONT COLOR ELEVATION o 4 �8' 16'
2
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-OCV
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lo
F 1
5" 12"
MY
5" 12" 5" 12" ROOF T.O. PLATE
--ROOF T.O. PLATE
.44. 20'-4" 20'-4"
Lo
t.
St
SF
zo
LEVEL LEVELL.2_&,�
1 0'4"__5� 10'-4"
6SCREEN WALL
�5" 12"_ 5' 12"
L — — — — — — — — — — —
71111
titz"21 Z4, LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
o,-o,, 0'-0"
ROOF PLAN o'l 1 1 �4' �8' 16' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 8' 16'
7 =ONE] mmc OEM[I
40
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
. 1 4a
BUILDING TYPE 1 COLOR SCHEME 1
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"r.
DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
— '-'COOL-DECEMBER" ——-—-----—------------------
----------------
----------------
------------------------
- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS" ot Pd ry 7-
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
—--—---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
——-—-- ---------------------------------------------------
-G2--FLAT-CONCRETE-ROOF
-,TIL-ES "AVONDALE-BLEND I------------------------------------------------------------
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET" .0
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
.� a
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
11JET_'v
-—-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD_\g,EDCyz
F1 C
1 13
Ric Barbe
09 28 2
ned..
Zo A,
Expires V31/2026
INS
IN
ROOF T.O. PLAT ROOF T.O. PLATE 20,_4
tt
ttd
LEVEL L 10_4
LEVEL
L2
10 4
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll_&� LEVEL Ll
01-01,
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10, -00
14' 18, 116' FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
11 =SEC
SCALE: 1/8 -01, SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O. PLATE__��
20'-4" 20'-4"
-LEVEL_L2-._& LEVEL L2_&
10'4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
---0-0 --------
" —----------
01-01, \__w
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
EMEME]
10, 14' 18' 116' ul 1 1 �4' 8' 16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
30
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
* 14
BUILDING TYPE 1 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
-------------- —------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
00
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
2 -------------- DE6_2_12-"CRISP MUSLIN"_,_________ MEN(:]
3.24 D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS •
ry 7-
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
88'-8" D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot P
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
---------------I-—------------- ---------------------—-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---- ------- --------------------------------
E2CORONA_D.0---STONE BRICK VENEER-COLOR-"BEAR-CREEK"
------------------------ 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
------------ —------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
Ns Ll Ll __ Ll Ll- Ll H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
<
> < <
-------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JET
> <
< I �METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
> < ....... -------------------
> <
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
> I I o JET11
> r World HQ@ORBArch . com
> <
<
<
<
<
> <
*4 \6, > I< RED ARC�,l
C? > <
�D > <
cl) E�] C) D D 3 9�_
\A3.24aF <
<
< N3.24af
< 1 13
< .....Ric arn
6 28 2
<UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH1 < ned.
< P.
< 70 A,
Expires V31/2026
UNIT LO j
T.O.❑ ❑
ROOF PLATE
7777777fW/77777 r\/A/-A
20'-4"
ON
xx
18'-2" 11,4, 18,4' 16'-6"
le-—--------- -------- tv
-
88'-8"
cli
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
mop-
10, 14' 18, 116' LEVEL Ll
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 ...........
C5D - \_w
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
91'
1'4' . 4"
-
88'-8"
----------------
11
Ar
> I A A A I I <
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
I>
>
> /\j
❑
> /\j
> 14
----- ----- ---- -- - ----- -----
>
< ROOF TO.__PLATE
>co >
- "20' 4.ntrr< fr
c
<
<
❑ ( � .,, ( ;,�, .. ..,. r is tr -'. ,,,„,. ':.
ifs t
<
UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 L UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 Ll UNIT TH1 <
1 7 < -- ----LEVELL2__
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM < 101-4"
<
------------
>>
_
6'SCREEN WALL
..............
LE L
................ 01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18, 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
601-1 1111111111111MOG]
SCALE: 1/8"=l'-O" SCALE: 1/8"=l'-O"
— — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — F — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LO I LO
04
0 C'4 1
LO
LO
_j
5" 12"
5 112" ROOF T.O. PLAT' ROOF T.O. PLATE
2 0,_4 20'-4"
zr
qq
=t
cli cli
LEVEL L —LEVEL L2
10 4� 10_4�_�
5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12"
5" 12" 6'SCREEN WALL
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - — - - - -
K.
E 6'SCREEN WALL
NO
LEVEL Ll
------------ ------LEVEL Ll
_5�
01-01, b-0
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
-P DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
ROOF PLAN 10,11114' 18' 116' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' ❑ RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
El
70 40 11-01, �3) A . 24a
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
BUILDING TYPE 2 COLOR SCHEME 1
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
-------------- ------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
"COOL DECEMBER"
RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
--------------_DE6_2_12-"CRISP MUSLIN"_,_________ MEN(:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
ry 7-
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot p
---------------_DE6215 "WOODEN_ ---------------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---- ------- --------------------------------
E2CORONA_D.O---STONE BRICK VENEER-COLOR-"BEAR-CREEK"
------------------------ 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
-------------- DE6378-..JET —-——-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 11JET'f
-------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
JET
WorldHQ@ ORBArch . com
cD_\g,EDCyz
FI C
1 13
F Ric Barbe
09 28 2
nedP.
Z 0—A,U.
Expires 3/31/2026
...... IS W ROOF T.O. PLATE
...... xr, 20'-4"
17, fi
is tt
It
.. ..............
}fir I
tI
cli
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
ff
0,—o,, \_pF
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 4' �8' 16'
mmmu
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
.................
ROOF T.O. PLATE
...... .. ..........
.......... 29-
......... ............................
cli
......... .............
LEVELL2
10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
i.
L,
--------------- LEVEL_01
0
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
MENU
2 SCALE: 1/8"=l'-O"
ROOF T.O. L�T ROOF T.O. PLATE
20_4�
�04 -�
tr
it
tt
cli cli
LEVEL L2 LEVEL L2
4 1 10 0,_4
USCREEN WALL
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
01-o" -01,
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
0,1 14' 81 16' 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION r,,� RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
=ONE] OEM[I
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" 024
� 4)
BUILDING TYPE 2 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE GOLDFIELD
2
134
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
87'4"
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS" ot Pd Ch
1(DI 01 0 D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
L-i DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
_.-___ E1 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY" '�/
---—---------- — ----- ——---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
-- -------- ---------
VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
> ------- < ------------------ —-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> < G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
0-
> <
> < G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
>
> F > 7 <
> < H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
> <
I <
> K < ----------------------------------------------------------------------
K > 000 < "NA3.34al I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
< (3`znqo�2�
>1 Y. 3 DE6378 "JET"
r4 0
C? >
\A3. ZD > K > < -------- -------------------
co > K = > 0 < J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
,< C�j C11j
> <
bo > Co <
t GARAGE GARAGE > LLL GARAGE >> "JET"
> World HQ@ORBArch . com
10'-T 10--T > 10'-7
>
1�0 III-'
0
0� />
> A < > >
> UNIT TH3 < I > UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 <
> < > > <
> > > D ARO
> >
CD
< I CAT Fc
r777771i X I Iii — b- 1 13
Ric Barbe
77 77
----------
2-�
0 28
ROOF T.O. PLATE
_20'4"
ned.
S.
/Zo A,
29'-2" 29'-0" 29'-2"
Expires 3 31/2026
87'4'
------------------------------ -------
---------------------------------------------
LEVEL L2 n 10,_4
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL Ll 0,1 1 1 �4' 18' 16'
LEVEL Ll
F
0,
SCALE: 11811 1 I-Of,
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION III 1 �4 �8' 16'
mmmmmw_l
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
901-01,
—---------------
1'4' Et 1'4
87 4
—----------------------- �O
EEI >
> >
LE]
1 F 1
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
'71
>
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
1 7= BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
C? 77
ZtD >
cogrr
>
>
A A A A
> UNIT TH3UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3
> <
> <
> < > <
>
> < > < > < —LEVEL L2
BEDROOM < >> BEDROOM < > BEDROOM < 10'-4"
6A7=� ^7r^7A/\777^/,A 4,A A <----/A\^AAAAA 4.-
6'SCREEN WALL
----------
LEVEL Ll
01-01,
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
06 -.-- mw�] 2 mmou
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO LO
C14
Lr)
NNI ;
EM
I L ROOFT.O. PLATE O.-PLATE
20'-4" 20'-4"
01
fr
rt
er
rf
t.
LO LOit
............
L? I?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEVEL L2 LEVEL L2
I 10 4 10'-4iI
1 5" 12" 5" 12"
5" 12" 512 5" 12" C14 -0 0-
------ 6'SCREEN WALL
LY
LO LO
L — — — — — — — — — — — — L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
—T,
LEVEL_�j LEVELL1
......................................... ................1 --_---7..........7............ 0 0 . ...... "'711 , E-7 0 0�11
ROOF PLAN O'l 1 1 4' 8' 16'
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 0'1 I 114' 18, 116' /� RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 4' �8' 16'
�
SCALE: 1/8"=1'0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'0" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
4a
BUILDING TYPE 3 COLOR SCHEME 1
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383 SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
"COOL DECEMBER"
-------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS" ot Pd ry 7-
-------------
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
............ ---——-- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND-----------------------------------------------------------
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET" .0
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET" a �
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
--------------1--l#J-E-T'#--.-----------------------------.------------—----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World HQ@ORBArch . com
bOG I i H i I
_\g,ED —ARcl,,
I CA T
1 13
Ric Barbe
ROOF T.O. L�T� 28 2
20_4
ied.
Expires 3/31/2026
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
F.
f.
LEVEL Ll
-I`7 7�`,' I TAGNORTEM 01-01,
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4 �8' �16'
� -
1 - mmmmmW]
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
J F
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
km
............tI
.........
rt,
r.
............... �Z ..........�,44
77� ...............
_7=7
...........
77,
...................
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
N
LEVELL1 EW
............__7...... 01-01,
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0, 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
------------ ----- ------------------- ROOF T.O._PLATE_5� ROOFT.O.-PLATE
",""M N 20'-4" 20'-4"
it rrr,
rI
.............................. .....
17� .........
........
.. .......... ..
........ .................. ...........
I?
cliir> .. ... C\j
_ LEVEL L2 LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
.........
1111111�11�.............i-,
LEVEL Ll
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116' /� RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8"=1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL'
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
BUILDING TYPE 3 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
r
J-1
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
---------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW
383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
—---—------------------------------
3.44 E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW FRAMECOLOR BLACK---58-0 G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I _____I_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
n_
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
Li (D Li 01 Li "JET" WorldHQ@ ORBArch . com
>
ED AROy
CGS I C A T TFD
9- CAP 0
> < ?JO—
> <
< 1 13
< Ric Barbe
> <
LLL
09 28 2
>
ned.
<
< /3--'\ F —LJ\ 1 'ql?IZO A,\�-'�'
r4 0 <
C:) >
co > < N3.44al Expires 3/31/2026
<
\A�3.44 GARAGE = GARAGE = <
> K 0� C-� >
> K >
>
>
>
>
UNIT TH3 > UNIT TH3 <
>
> > ROOF T.O. PLATE
> 20'-4"
>
>
rf
I?
In
cli
LEVELL2, �
10'-4"
58'4"
Wm
LEVEL L------------------
........................ R I——
01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 10, 14' 18, 116'
5 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
FRONT
---- COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14 18, 116'
SCALE: 1/8"=l'-O"
61'-0"
'4" 584' 1 4"
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0�_
f—------- ----------------- 1 C G J 1 F 1 F
❑ > <
> > <
> BEDROOM BEDROOM <
> > <
>
>
> K
> ROOF T.O. PLATE
>
>
ft
r._ > BEDROOM BEDROOM
C? > >
> K >
K >
< > N .
< > LEVELL2
> 0__��
> '4�
> <
> <
> UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 <
>
> BEDROOM BEDROOM
>
> USCREEN WALL
> ----LEVEL Ll
00tt
>
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18' 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116'
C6j SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" NEWC
SCALE: 1/8" l'-Ott
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N
LO N N
N
LO I
ROOFT.O. PLATE _ROOFT.O. PLATE
2 4" 4"0' 20'
Ii
rsr
niS
rr
tt
LOft
? L?
10 10
04 04
LEVEL_L2 —-- ----- —LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10'-4"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
USCREEN WALL
5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12"
FSCREEN WALL
Hli
LEVEL L LEVEL Ll
00
SIN 01
-01,
1-0
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Li Lj
ROOF PLAN 10,1 1 114' 18, 116' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
4SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
__❑ _ DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
A . 44a
7�
BUILDING TYPE 4 COLOR SCHEME 1
mmmmmmu
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOI IS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
2C,
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—-------------— ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW FRAMECOLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDSDE6378 JET
.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------- .1�
I -][METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
n_
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD-\g,EDCyz
F1 C
1 13
Ric Barbe
09 28 2
ZO A,U.
Expires V31/2026
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4t .
I?
LEVELL2
10'-4"
T TT
NONNI[]
LEVEL L 0
==3 _01
FRONT
---- COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14 18, 116'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
F
ROOF1.0 PLATE
240
...........
tt
tt
..........
I?
.......
LEVELL2
1 OQ-4�
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01-01,
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18' 116'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
ROOFT.O. PLATE ROOFT T.
O. PLATE
20'-4" 4"............ 20'
il,S ............................... ................
......... .........
......�':........ ...... 77
........ ............................
tt
tz
tir
I? in .........
04 04
---------- ---- LEVEL L2 —LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10'-4"
USCREEN WALL
6SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
LEVEL Ll
0, 01
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,1 1 114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
40
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' 0� SCALE: 1/8"=1'4'
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
A 044
BUILDING TYPE 4 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
87'4"
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
NlIN "DOLPHIN TALES"
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
Lj I L-i ED 10 D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot
< --------Nl DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
------------ < > <
< > < D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
< DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
< > <
< -------------_ _R NAD_____T N_E_BR_1K__`VEN_EE`_R __R ........W---------------------
--------------------------
-------------------------
------------------
--
< El LF GREY"
o < - -----
------------------------
---- -------- < of
> E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK 0
> < --- -- --------------------------
> F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
> F 7 F < ------------------ —-—-——------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<
> < G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
>
> <
> < 71 G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
> 1- 4
> 0 0 <
r4 > K > K H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
co > K > o 1 11 K N3.54al
\A3.54aF > > K N �01
K -1 DE6378 "JET"
> K > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
GARAGE 30 GARAGE- > GARAGE
< <
K K 10, < I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
t/ 10W" 10 W" K -9.1 --------- -------- _ n
- --------------------------------------- --------- -- --------- J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
> <
> < "JET"
UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 < World HQ@ORBArch . com
>
_'g,ED ARC
1,11
I C A
cFP 0
1 13
2 9-2" 2 - 2 -2
2 9-2" 7 Ric Ba be
09 28 2
87'-4" ied.
41?1 Z 0- A,
Expires V31/2026
ROOF T.O. PLATE
2 4"
0'
Ha
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL Ll 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' —LEVEL L2
10'-4"
mill
ME LEVELL1
www
..............
u-0
901-01, FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
87f4ff -4ff- moll
SCALE: 1/8f'=1'4'
---JL
>
> K > <
> El K E1
> BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOMo <
>
>
------------- ---------- <
<
>
> <
> <
>
L >
<
> < BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
C? C?
co ZtD < ED
co < co
<
<
ROOFT
PLATE
<
< 2u-
UNIT TH3 /,A/\A,,.)====, /�AAA UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3
----------------N
M< >
< > ti
BEDROOM < > BEDROOM BEDROOM
<
it t
<
------rn
LEVELL2
A A I 1 7 7777l777rr\7 10'-4"
"i---------- -------
USCREEN WALL
-----------------
LEVEL Ll
..........................................
60FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
1 — SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
0REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
� SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
- - - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
�j) �Q�l 04 �Gj I E]j) Pjj
5" 12 1 1 F
5" 12" 5" 12
ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF ROOF T.O.PLATE_4� 20_4�
LID
5" 12" 5" 12"
r. LO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LEVEL L LEVELL
1 0,_
10'-4 4
C\1 5"
tr C\1 04
-0 LID USCREEN WALL
sa
LO
7
0 6'SCREEN WALL
- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
——----------- 01 01 �............
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
-206
-HT,. COL,OR.'ELEVATION
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23
ROOF PLAN 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' LEFT COLOR ELEVAT 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' RIG -1
moll MEW
4 . .. ....... 3
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
..............
4a
L -L---'
F-1
L mill
BUILDING TYPE 5 COLOR SCHEME 1
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
CG
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW
383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------ — ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW FRAMECOLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDSDE6378 JET
.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------- .1�
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET" (3�znqv'2� .-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD_\g,EDCyz
F1 C
4;4
Ric Barbe
09 28 2
T ned.
Zo A,
Expires 3/31/2026
pW`
ROOF T.O. PLATE
2 _4
—LEVEL L2
10'-4"
LEVEL L1
wwww"M
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 4' �8' �16'
MENG
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
F
ROOF T.O. PLATE
-——-------
NONE= 20'-4"
. .... ....
........
c.
t 2,
........
.......
............ 7................. .......... .......
........ ................... LEVELL2
1 U-4-
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
10 ;
ROOF T.O. �20T Now= T.O.0 PLATE 4� 20_4�
{Ilia ....................................
...................
...........
...............
y.
.........
LEVEL L2 LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL 6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
01-01, 01-01,
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
6-206
16'
H T, 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23
0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' RIG COLOR LEFT COLOR ELEVATION`,_ ' ' I ' ll , 1 -1
40
. ....... 3 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
SCALE: 1/8" 14 •
..............
BUILDING TYPE 5 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
cC ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
r2 C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
N3.64�F DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
,*Vr ----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
1164" DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
--------------DE6215 "WOODEN PEG" —-—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
—---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
-----—------- ----------- ----------------------------
> DE6378 "JET"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
------ I ____]_METAL TO-BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
< J ME L FA CIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
< World HQ@ORBArch . com
<
F-7— <
<
<
<
�,7�71
< 43
000 000
r4 C? 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
<
\A3.64,-r < > > < NA3.64a cD
0� > C�l C-� > < (j)
bo bo > 80 80 > <
>
10f-7ff 10'-T 101-T 10'-T Ric Barbe
GARAGE - GARAGE- GARAGE - GARAGE -
< 28 ?' 2
K <
UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3
<
I—01-1-11 7 —ROOF T.O. PLATE Expires 3/31/2026
20'-4"
<
7=7�71 IIAIAA
1��Av,--
29--0" 29'-0" 29--0" 29'-0" LEVEL L2_��
116'-0" 10'-4"
i i�i N iii RE imm;
LEVEL L
01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 O'l 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O'f
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
118'-8"
4 1'4'
116'-0" oe
_;00 1 ;00
r --—----------- 71
<
1# OF 1 �c F 1 1
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM <
< ------------------
<
LL
ROOF T.O. PLATE
> 777 BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
C? > < -4"
> K >
20'
co C:) W-1
co
>
> [Ell <
> UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 <
> F__
> BEDROOM > BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM < LEVEL L2
>1 > < 10'-4"
1 > <
> > > <
I > < USCREEN WALL
>
AAA/\A/\A/\A7771� VA/\A/�A4AAA
iffl w
LEVEL Ll
w
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
NOME
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
= I J F 1 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO LO
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO
ROOFTO,PLATE_&� ROOFT.Q.-PLATE
20'-4" 20'-4"
5" 12"
C\j 5" 12"
7:
LO
5" 12" 5" 12"
C14 cli
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------- LEVEL L2 —----- LEVEL_L2_A
10 10'4"
5" 12" 5" 12"
6'SCREEN WALL
C\1
LO
LO
LO
FSCREEN WALL
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1 7,
LEVEL Ll LEVEL L
I ERR, 0, T= 0, 01
9 Al I
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
"P') ROOF PLAN 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' �16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
No$ E_ MCI
70 40] 30
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
2,
BUILDING TYPE 6 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
r
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------ — ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS Q
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -1�
I ____]_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET" (3�znqv'2� .
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
_\g,ED ARC�IZ
(j) 9- C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ned. -
41?
........... IZO A,
ROOF T.O. PLATE_��
------------— Expires 3/31/2026
20'-4"
..........
_LEVELL2__��
10'-4"
LEVEL Ll
7777777-7--- .. ................ 7,,�TX�
01-Oi
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
—------------------------------
................:L............................ ...............
............
ROOF T.O. PL
2�T
0
_4
................... ......... ......
...................................
............
...........
cli ......... .....................
.......... ......... ...............
LEVE� L
10�4�
6'SCREEN WALL
HE
LEVEL Ll
f TGRAMM;
.... .......... 01-01,
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
REAR COLOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
i f
1 gii MEMO
—ROOFT.O. PLATE ROO F-T.0,PLATE
20'-4" 20'-4"
g,
I........... ..........
............
7 v 7� L,
...............................................
..........
04 04
LEVEL_L2__A-,\, —----- LEVELL2_��
10'-4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL FSCREEN WALL
E, T-111
.........
LEV%�L
01 LEVEL Ll
0-0
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
0 - LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,1 1 114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' �16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
4jE_
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" 30 SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
BUILDING TYPE 6 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
cc, ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------------— ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
2 F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.74 G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
334' H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
DE6378 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
I ______METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
[(:—Dl 10-1
Ns Li Ll Li
-------------
>
> 0
0 1 13
< Ric Barbe
< 28 2
F
< ned.
<
< 0 A,
I> < Expires 3/31/2026
<
r4 N%, �<
C? 3
�0 �<
\A3.74 < "kA3.74af
>1 <
> <
> UNIT TH1 UNIT TH1 <
> v
> <
> < C F F 1
> <
> <
> <
> <
A �,AAAA-
-*��---------- ROOF T.O. PLATE
NMI 20'-4"
16-5 1/2" 16-5 1/2"
oe oe
Nonni[]
32'-11"
-/r----------------------------—-------------------------------------------------------------
ZA_
-LEVELL2
10'-4
\A3.74al
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 10, 14' 18, 116'
r........ —LEVEL�--�
0 01
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
A
mmmEl
-0"
35-7 SCALE: 1/8" 1'
4 1'4`
32'-11"
F 1 1
E110 Id Id ID
31/�
ROOF T.O. PLATE
< 20'-4"
AIN
<
<
co <
cli
co
ZD
UNIT TH1 UNIT TH1 LEVELL2
A
I < 10'-4"
> BEDROOM BEDROOM <
> <
> <
<
<
< ........
7 77777777= < 6'SCREEN WALL
Lij
LEVE L
01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18' 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION ul 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
MENU
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1 1-01,
r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
�b J) OF 1 1
5" 12" 5" 12"
Lr) L0
NONNI5" 12" 5" 12" ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O._PL T
20'-4" _4�
M
C.0
CN
LO LO
LEVEL L2 LEVELL2
�1�0�4� 10'-4"
5" 12" 5" 12"
6'SCREEN WALL
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F"F`-7 T
L T-
..........
LEVEL Ll
77=777 ...........
vmr
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
u
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
A . 74a
ROOF PLAN 10, 14' 18' 116' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
30
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0" SCALE: 1
BUILDING TYPE 7 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
00
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
CCII ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------ — ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I ____]_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD_\g,�D__Cyz
�1 C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ned..
Zo A,
Expires V31/2026
... ........
......... ..........
ROOFTO._PLATE_��
..............----—-------- ........... 1 11
20-4
........",=
1,11;'N'
..........
mop_
........
..... ...............
LEVEL L2'
—LEVELL1
............... ..........
01-01,
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
-0"
SCALE: 1/8" 1'
F
—---------
ROOF T.O.-PLATE
20'-4"
.... ...............
LEVELUA
10'-4"
FSCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01-0"
REAR COLOR ELEVATION ul 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
F
ROOF T.O. PLAT�_�� ROOF T.O. L�T�
_R
20,_4 20_4
_77,
7
.......... . ......
C.0 ......
................
LEVE L LEVEL L2
0'4� 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
E,
LEVELL_1_�� LEVELL1_& RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
01
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
(N
A 074
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
� 4) 30
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
BUILDING TYPE 7 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------ ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
1"DOLPHIN TALES" SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383 RESORT BLVD
"COOL DECEMBER"
—--------------------------------------
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ------------------------------ -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
---------- ------—-—-------------------------------------—-----------------------------------------------------------------
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
54'--4 G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND--------------------------------------------
H GARAG__E_D_0ORTO-BE PA—INT—EDF1NIS_HDUNN ED—WARDS------------------------ .0
DE6378 "JET"
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
1 101 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- World HQ@ORBArch . com
_\gED ARC1,11
-\UICAT
1 13
Ric Barbe
T_ 28 2
ned.
7 __7 F
> F—T— —T7 < Zo A,
> <
r4 4 < Expires 3/31/2026
> <
>
>1 00 1< 'NA3.84a/
'A%.K C-) <
<
>1 �<
> V 114r,
\A3.84; 0 1 YA3
zC?
J IL <
<
>1 _A�� <
> < i F 1 1
>
UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2
t A A
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
16-11/2" 181-01, 18'-11/2"
----------------- —------------------ -------------------
54'-3"
------------------------------------ --------- —------------------------------
CN
LEVEL L2_
10'-4"
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 10, 14' 18, 116' _LEVELL1
F] El
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116'
MEMMMME-1
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
56-11"
54'-3" 14'
...............---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------
F1 --------------- ---- ---------- n
777- 1-77
>
> F
> BEDROOM
> BEDROOM BEDROOM
>
IN
ROOF T.O. PLATE
29-4
co
77 7\
UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2
lk -A Ed I== < LEVEL L2
BEDROOM 7 BEDROOM BEDROOM <
�x
> �x 6'SCREEN WALL
v
�x
--------- LEVELLI__��
01-01,
60 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18' 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10,1 1 114'', 1'81' �1'6'1 ...
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' 2 SCALE: 1/8"=1'70"'
........ ....
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO
ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O. L�T
20'-4" 20_4� Apr
5" 12" 5" 12"
. . ....... . .......
C14
LO LEVEL L2 LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10f-4"
5" 12" 6'SCREEN WALL
5" 12"
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b'SCREEN WALL
L - - - - - - - - - - _ _ j
-------------------- - - - - - - - -
-LEVEL Ll LEVE,�L
0
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
EMEME]
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
CX
BLDG TYPE 8 ROOF PLAN 10, 14' 18' 116' -1 LEFT COLOR_-ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116'
moo-] MM071
70 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
0� A
UNIT TH2
BUILDING TYPE 8 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------ ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES"
cc, SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
__"COOL DECEMBER" —-------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ------------------------------ -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
---------- ------—-—-------------------------------------—-----------------------------------------------------------------
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CON-CRETE ROOF-TIL-_ES "AVON-_DALE B-LEND-------------------------------------------
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET"
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
--'-'JET" ——-—--------------------------------------------------------------------- World HQ@ORBArch . com
g,�D__Cyz
_\�l C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ned.. -
Zo A,\�
Expires V31/2026
i F
............
........... ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
-----LEVEL L2
..I........
LEVEL Ll
0'-0"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
F 1 1
ME
......... ROOF T.O. PLATE
C14
LEVEL L
10,_
4
USCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01
10,1 1 1 14'� 1 8' 16'
REAR COLOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8"=1'70"
........ ....
i F
ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O. PLAT
7 U_��
�L� 2 _4
........ 20-4�
"Y
F_
C14
............ Z, ................
LEVE L LEVE L
1 0�
4� 1 0�
_4�
6'SCREEN WALL 6SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
\------- ---- ------
01
-0.
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
10, 14' 18' 116' 10,1 1 114' 18' 116'
LEFT COLOR-ELEVATI-ON RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
4)
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
BUILDING TYPE 8 COLOR SCHEME 2
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BTR
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
/0'2
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
---------"COOL DECEMBER" ----------------------------------------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
96-Y DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
00� 39'-11 564" D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Ri ry L
-------- DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS-"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
> < El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
< E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
<
< F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
< ----—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
/T!ml -------------------------------------------------------
I"fi
A H -----------
AH < —----------------——----------------------------------------------------------
A H < H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
DE6378 "JET"
COMMUNITY FLEX SPACE < OFFICE FR
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
J METAL FASCIA TO BE
T-"
H "JET"
< ----------- ----—----------------------------------------------------------------------------
< World HQ@ORBArch . com
<
LEASING
CY/
------- \cD
9-
CLUBHOUSE T.O. ROOF
K. . . . . . . < BREAK ROOM < 22'-10"
K <
< < 1 13
oK < < Ric Barbe
a >�(0 < <
>< K < 28 2
MECHANICAL K STORAGE OFFICE < <
> < <
> Y-A
< ed.
< �O4 zo-
< A,
> <
< Cf Epims 3�il/2026
< 3
co
< CLUBHOUSE T.O. PLATE
<
7< Cp
<
<
MAINTENANCE
<
CLUB ROOM
<
LEVE
<
77777'
<
FITNESS
BUSINESS
77777 CENTER
> IL
< O'l 1 1 4' 8' 16'
> < > CLUB HOUSE FRONT ELEVATION
> EMNE]
> SCALE: 1/8" 1%0"
77<
U?
CLUBHOUSE T.O. R
22�9
UBHOUSE T.O. PLATE''
1 V-6"
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
CLUB HOUSE FLOOR PLAN 11�,VIVIVIVIVIVIV
E]
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
LEVEL Ll ...............
0 011
OPEN
4" 12" 4" 12" 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
F - --1 CLUB HOUSE BACK ELEVATION
L - -1 SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
L - - - - - - - - -j CLUBHOUSE T.O. ROOF
4" 12" 22'-10"
----------------
CLUBHOUSE T.O. PLATE_Au-�
1 V-6"
4" 12"
LEVEL Ll
............. o,-o,,
4" 12"
CLUB HOUSE RIGHT ELEVATION 0,1 �4' 8' 16'
C3)F-1 El
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
J CLUBHOUSE T.O. ROO
T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - —J��
22'-10"
(h
4" 12" 4" 12"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLUBHOUSE T.O. PLATE
1 V-6"
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...........
RE-Z NIN UBMITTAL
LEVEL Ll
01
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
CLUB HOUSE ROOF PLAN 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
6 MENU OPEN -
SCALE: 1/8" 1%0"
A
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
CLUB HOUSE LEFT ELEVATION
C4)
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
CLUBHOUSE
mmmmlu
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
— '-'COOL-DECEMBER" ——-—-----—--------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
Cl STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
Dl STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
Z 28'-0" -T_-7/ DE6376 "LOOKI NG_GLASS"------------_ ot Pd Ch
_//----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gl FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
——-—-- ---------------------------------------------------
Ns Ll G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
> S T,
TORAGE: E6378 "JET"
> I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
> J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
r4k-N > /3 11JET'v
<
< -—-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\A3.14 > --------------------—-------------------;.I —----- N3.14al W o r I d HQ@ORBArch . com
>
C? > <
>
> GARAGEN' GARAGE F7- GAUGE -\�?,ED A C,�l
\cD - //�
I CAT
1 13
Ric Barbe
0 28 2
S1 ned.
Z 0-A,
MAi 71 :2 Expires 3 31 2026
34'-3"
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmou
50 FLOOR PLAN — LEVEL Ll o'l 1 1 �4' 81 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
36-T
/--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------34'--3"
IF
EMEND.
>
>
BEDROOM ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O. PLAT��
20,_4
20'4"
X
cl?)
cli
oq > < zo
> (D < C4 oli
> <
> UNIT C LEVEL L�� LEVEL L2
0,
> < _4
> 10'-4"
> <
> C�l
> 6'SCREEN WALL
>
> <
>
>
1A LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
---------- A/\AAA��
ol
---- —-------
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 o'l 1 1 �4' �8' 16' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' FRONT COLOR ELEVATION o'l 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
2
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lo
F 1
5" 12"
MY
5" 12" 5" 12" ROOF T.O. PLATE
--ROOF T.O. PLATE
.4 20'-4" 20'-4"
Lo
zo
LEVELL.2 LEVELL.2_&,�
1 0'4"__5� 10'-4"
6SCREEN WALL
�5" 12"_ 5' 12"
L — — — — — — — — — — —
71111
titz"21 Z4, LEVEL Ll
LEVEL Ll
o,-o,, 0'-0"
ROOF PLAN o'l 1 1 �4' �8' 16' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 8' 16'
C7 =ONE] mmc OEM[I
40
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
. 1 4a
BUILDING TYPE I COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
— '-'COOL-DECEMBER" ——-—-----—--------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS" ot Pd ry 7-
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
—--—---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
——-—-- ---------------------------------------------------
-G2--FLAT-CONCR-ETE-ROOF-,TIL-ES "AVONDALE-BLEND I------------------------------------------------------------
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET" .0
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
11JET'v
-—-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD_\g,�D__Cyz
�1 C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ned..
Zo A,
Expires V31/2026
INS
IN
ROOF TO� PL�T ROOF T.O. PL�T
20,_4
LEVEL L LEVE�L�
10_4
10 4
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll_&� LEVEL Ll
01-01,
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116' FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
11 =SEC
SCALE: 1/8 -01, SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
ROOF T.O. PLATE' ROOF T.O. PLATE__��
20'-4" 20'-4"
-LEVEL_L2-._& LEVELL2_&
10'4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
-----------
�7""1 0,
-0" -----------
01-01, \__w
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
EMEME]
10, 14' 18' 116' ul 1 1 �4' 8' 16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
30
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
* 14
BUILDING TYPE I COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
-------------- —------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
00
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
2 -------------- DE6_2_12-"CRISP M_USLIN"_,_________ MEN(:]
3.24 D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
ry 7-
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
88'-8" D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot P
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
---------------I-—------------- ---------------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---- ------- --------------------------------
.___E2__,_CORONA_D.0---STONE BRICK VENEER-COLOR-"BEAR-C-REEK-------------------------- 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
------------ —------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
(D 1(_D1 (D] 1(D G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
Ns Ll Ll __ Ll Ll- Ll H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
�V\j !7=
<
> < <
-------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <
< I �METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
> < ....... -------------------
> <
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
> 'vJ ET11
> r World HQ@ORBArch . com
> <
> k_j J_ <
<
<
<
> <
*4 \6, > I< ,E ARC�,l
C? > <
�D > <
cl) E�] C) D D 3 9�_
\A3.24aF <
<
< N3.24af
< 1 13
< Kic arn
6 28 2
<
UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH1 < ned.
<
< 70 A,
Expires V31/2026
LU NI LO j
.0. PLATE
7777777fW/77777 r\/A/-A
20'-4"
ON
xx
18'-2" 11,4, 18,4' 16'-6"
le-—--------- ---------
88'-8"
cli
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
mop-
10, 14' 18, 116' LEVEL Ll
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1
...........
C5D - \_w
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
1'4' .91'4-"
88'-8"
----------------
11
Ar
> I A A A I I <
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
I>
>
> /\j
> /\j
> 14
----- ----- ---- -- - ----- -----
>
< ROOF TO.__PLATE
> <
> 20'-4"
<
>
c:) <
co > <
<
<
UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 L UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 Ll UNIT TH1 <
1 7 < -- ----LEVELL2__
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM < 101-4"
<
------------
>>
AAA K
AAAAAA_ 77 77 A 777= AAA 6'SCREEN WALL
..............
LE�L
................ 01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18, 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
601-1 1111111111111MOG]
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
— — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — F — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12" - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LO I
LO
04
0 C'4 1
LO
LO
_j
5" 12"
5" 12" ROOF T.O. PLAT' ROOF T.O. PLATE
2 0,_
4 20'-4"
=t
cli cli
L —LEVEL L2
10�4� 1_V4�_�
5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12"
5" 12" 6'SCREEN WALL
- ---------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - — - - - -
6'SCREEN WALL
E
NO
LEVEL Ll
------------ ------LEVEL Ll
_5�
01-01, b-0
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
-P DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
ROOF PLAN 10,11114' 18' 116' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
El
70 40 11-01, �3) A . 24a
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
BUILDING TYPE 2 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
-------------- ------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
"COOL DECEMBER"
RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
--------------_DE6_2_12-"CRISP M__USLIN"_,_________ MEN(:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
ry 7-
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot p
---------------_DE621__5___"WO_ODEN_ ---------------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---- ------- --------------------------------
.___E2__,_CORONA_D.O---STONE BRICK VENEER-COLOR-"BEAR-C-REEK-------------------------- 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
--------------_DE637_8 "JET" —-——-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 11JET'f
-------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
'vJ ET11
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD_\g,�D__Cyz
�I C
1 13
F Ric Barbe
0 28 2
ned.
Z 0—A,
Epims 3�31/2026
...... IS W ROOF T.O. PLATE
...... 20'-4"
17,
.. ..............
..........
cli
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
0,-o,, \_pF
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
mmmu
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
.................
ROOF T.O. PLATE
...... .. ..........
.......... 29-
......... ............................
cli
......... .............
—- ----- ...... LEVELL2
10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL,L__��
--------------- 0_01
lr._� REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
MENU
2 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
ROOF T.O. L�T ROOF T.O. PLATE
20_4�
�04"-�
cli cli
LEVEL L LEVEL L�
10 0,_4
4� 1
USCREEN WAL
-7�:
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
LEVEL Ll
01-o" -01,
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
0,1 14' 81 16' 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION
r,,� RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
=ONE] OEM[I
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" 024
� 4)
BUILDING TYPE 2 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE GOLDFIELD
2
134
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
87'4"
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS" ot Pd Ch
1(DI 01 0 D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
L-i DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
---—---------- — ----- ——---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
-- --------------------------
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
> ------- < ------------------ —-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> < G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
>P�� < 0-
> <
> < G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
> > < 'N
> F > 7 <
> < H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
> <
I <
> K < ----------------------------------------------------------------------
K > 000 < "NA3.34al I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
< (3�znqo�2�
>1 Y. 3 DE6378 "JET"
r4 0
C? >
\A3. ZD > K > < -------- -------------------
co > K = > 0 < J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
,< C�j C11j
> <
bo > Co <
t GARAGE GARAGE > LLL GARAGE >> "JET"
> World HQ@ORBArch . com
10'-T 10--T > 10'-T >
1�0 III-' �.L-
0
0� />
> A < > >
> UNIT TH3 < I > UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 <
> < > > <
> > > D
> > CD
< I C
r777771i X I Iii -
J�j
b- 1 13
Ric Barbe
77 77
----------
2-�
0 28
ROOF T.O. PLATE
_20'4"
ned.
/Zo A,
29'-2" 29'-0" 29'-2"
/——-————-----------------------—— —------- ------- ..................................................... Expires V31/2026
87'4'
------------------------------ -------
---------------------------------------------
LEVEL L
10,_
4
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL Ll 0,1 1 1 �4' 18' 16'
LEVEL Ll
F
0,
SCALE: 11811 1 I-Of,
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
mmmmmw_l
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
901-01,
—---------------
1'4' 1'4
—----------------------- �O
ml-JF_-��-_----_-��-_-�� F---JL -11 ___11
EEI >
> >
LE]
1 F 1
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
'71
>
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
1 7= BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
C?
ZtD >
co >
>
A A A A
> UNIT TH UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3
> <
> <
> < > <
>
> < > < > < —LEVEL L2
BEDROOM < >> BEDROOM < > BEDROOM < 10'-4"
6A7=� ^7r^7A/\777^/,A 4,A A <
----/A\^AAAAA 4.-
6'SCREEN WALL
----------
LEVEL
Ll
01-01,
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
06 -.-- mw�] 2 mmou
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO LO
C14
Lr) Lr)
NNI ;
EM
I L ROOFT.O. PLATE O.-PLATE
20'-4" 20'-4"
01
LO LO
............
L? I?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEVEL L2 _LEVELL2
I 1 10'-4"
1 5" 12" 5" 12"
5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12" C14 -0 0-
------ 6'SCREEN WALL
LY
LO LO
L - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-T,
LEVEL_�j LEVELL1
......................................... ................1 --_---7..........7............ 0 0 . ...... "'711 , E-7
771"", 0 0�11
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116' r.,� RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
O'l 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
ROOF PLAN
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
4a
BUILDING TYPE 3 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES" BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383 SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
"COOL DECEMBER"
-------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS" ot Pd ry 7-
-------------
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK"
0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
............ ---——-- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND-----------------------------------------------------------
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET" .0
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
--------------1--l#J-E-T'#--.-----------------------------.------------—----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World HQ@ORBArch . com
bO I i H i I
_\g,�D —ARcl,,
I CA T
1 13
Ric Barbe
ROOF T.O. L�T� 28 2
20_4
ied.
Expires 3/31/2026
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
LEVEL Ll
-I
`7 7�`,' I TAGNORTEM 01-01,
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' �16'
--- mmmmmW]
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
J F
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
km
............ .........
............... �Z ..........�,44
77� ...............
_7=7
...........
77,
...................
LEVEL L2
10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVELL1
NEW
............__7......
01-01,
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' �16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
------------ ----- ------------------- ROOF 7.0._PLATE_5� ROOFT.O.-PLATE
",""M N 20'-4" 20'-4"
.............................. .....
17� .........
........
.. .......... ..
........ .................. ...........
I?
cli .. ... C\j
_LEVELL2__�� _LEVELL2
10'-4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
"I...........
1111111�11�.............i-,
LEVEL Ll
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116' r.,� RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' �16'
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
BUILDING TYPE 3 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
r
J-1
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
---------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
—---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
58'-0" G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
;�;
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I _____I_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
Li (D Li 01 Li "JET" World HQ@ORBArch . com
>
�D
I C A T
9- 0
> < ?JO—
> <
< 1 13
< Ric Barbe
> <
LLL
0 28 2
>
ned.
<
< /3--'\ F —LJ\ 1 'ql?IZO A,\�-'�'
r4 0 <
C:) >
co > < N3.44al Expires 3/31/2026
<
\A�3.44 GARAGE = GARAGE = <
> K 0� C-� >
> K >
>
>
>
>
UNIT TH3 > UNIT TH3 <
>
> > ROOF T.O. PLATE
> 20'-4"
>
>
I?
In
cli
LEVELL2,_��
10'-4"
58'4"
Wm
LEV L
------------------
........................ R I——_1.1_.__1.,___''
01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 10, 14' 18, 116'
5 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
---- FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
61'-0"
'4" 58'4' 14"
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0�_
f—-------t/�� ----------------- 1 1 F 1 F
> <
> > <
> BEDROOM BEDROOM <
> > <
>
>
> K
> ROOF T.O. PLATE
> 20'-4"
>
r._ > BEDROOM BEDROOM
C? > >
> K >
K >
< >
< > LEVELL2
> 0__��
> '4�
> <
> <
> UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 <
>
> BEDROOM BEDROOM
>
> USCREEN WALL
> ----LEVEL Ll
>
>
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18' 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116'
C6j SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" NEWC
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N
LO N N
N
LO ROOFT.O. PLATE _ROOFT.O. PLATE
2 4" 4"
0' 20'
L? L?
10 10
04 04
___LEVEL_L2 —-- ----- —LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10'-4"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
USCREEN WALL
5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12" 5" 12"
FSCREEN WALL
Hli
LEVEL L LEVEL Ll
—11 SIN 01
-01,
01-0
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Li Lj
ROOF PLAN 10,1 1 114' 18, 116' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
40
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
A . 44a
7�
BUILDING TYPE 4 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmmmu
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOI IS PANEI C,01 OR DI INN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
2C,
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—-------------— ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
---------------------------------------------------------------------- .1�
I -][METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD-\g,�DCyz
�1 C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ZO A,
Expires V31/2026
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
I?
LEVELL2
10'-4"
NONNI[]
LEVE L
0�
==3 _01
---- FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
F
ROOF1
PL�04
.0 2
...........
..........
I?
.......
LEVELL2
�OQ-4�
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01-01,
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18' 116'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
ROOFT.O. PLATE ROOFT-.-0. PLATE
20'-4" 4"
............ 20'
il,S ............................... ................
......... .........
......�':........ ...... 77
........ ............................
7� ------ 7111111=7 .......
I? I? .........
04
04
---------- ----LEVELL2 —LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10'-4"
USCREEN WALL
6SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
LEVEL Ll
0, 01
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,1 1 114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
40
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' 0� SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
A 044
BUILDING TYPE 4 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
87'4"
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
NlIN "DOLPHIN TALES"
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
Lj I L-i ED 10 L_j D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd t-V 7-
< --------Nl DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
----—------- < > <
< > < D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
< DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
< > <
< -------------_ _R NAD_____T N_E_BR_1K__`VEN_EE`_R __R ........W--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< El LF REY"
< — -----
------------------------
---- -------- < of
> E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK 0
> < —-- -- --------------------------
> F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
> F 7 F < ------------------ —-—-——------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<
> < G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
>
> <
> < 71 G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
> 1- 4
< 3 'N
> 0 0 <
r4 > K > K H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
co > K > o 1 11 K N3.54al
\A3.54aF > > K N �01
K -1 DE6378 "JET"
> K > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
GARAGE 30 GARAGE- > GARAGE �-
< < <
K K 10, < I ____]_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
t/ 10W" 1 OW" K -9.1 -------- -------------------
------------ ----------------—---------------------- --------- -- --------- J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
> <
> < "JET"
UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 < World HQ@ORBArch . com
>
_'g,ED ARC1,11
I C A
0
1 13
2 9-2" 29'-0" 2 9-2" 7 Ric Ba be
28 2
87'-4" ied.
41?1 Z 0- A,
Expires V31/2026
ROOF T.O. PLATE
2 4"
0'
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL Ll 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' —LEVEL L2
10'-4"
mill
ME LEVELL1
www
..............
u-0
901-01, FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
87f4ff -4ff- moll
SCALE: 1/8f'=1'4'
---JL
ii;4"ii;4
>
> K > <
> El K E1
> BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM <
>
>
------------- ---------- <
<
>
> <
> <
>
L >
<
> < BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
C? C?
co ZtD < ED
co < co
<
<
.............. > <
<
< 2u-
UNIT TH3 /,A/\A,,.)====, /�AAA UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3
----------------N
M
< >
< >
BEDROOM < > BEDROOM BEDROOM
<
<
------ LEVELL2
A A I 1 7 7777l777rr\7 10'-4"
"i---------- -------
USCREEN WALL
-----------------
LEVEL Ll
..........................................
60FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
1 — SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
0REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
� SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
- - - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
�j) �Q�l 04 �Gj I E]j) Pjj
5" 12" 1 1 F
5" 12" 5" 12
Eiji
ROOF T.O��20T ROOF T.O. L�T
_4� 20_4�
LID
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LEVEL L LEVELL
1 0,_
10'-4 4
C\1 5"
5" 12" 5" 12" 7:
C\1 04
-0 LID USCREEN WALL
LO
7
0 6'SCREEN WALL
- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
——----------- 01
01 �............
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
-206
-HT,. COL,OR.'ELEVATION
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23
ROOF PLAN 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' LEFT COLOR ELEVAT 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' RIG -1
moll MEW
4 . .. ....... 3
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
..............
4a
L -L---'
F-1
L mill
BUILDING TYPE 5 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
CG
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------ — ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
---------------------------------------------------------------------- .1�
I ____]_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET" (3�znqv'2� .
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD_\g,�D__Cyz
�1 C
4;4
Ric Barbe
28 2
T ned.
Zo A,
Expires 3/31/2026
pW`
ROOF T.O. PLA
2 _4
—LEVEL L2
10'-4"
wwww"M
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' �16'
MENG
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
F
ROOF T.O. PLATE
-——-------
NONE= 20'-4"
. .... ....
........
........
.......
............ 7................. .......... .......
........ .......
............ LEVELL2
1 U-4-
6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01
REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
10 ;
ROOF T.O��20T Now= —T.0 L�T
4� 20_4�
....................................
...................
...........
...............�7
.........
LEVEL L2 LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL 6'SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
01-01, 01-01,
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
6
-206
16'
H T, 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23
0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' RIG OL,OR 'ELEVATION
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION`,_ ' ' I ' ll , 1 -1
40
. ....... 3 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
..............
BUILDING TYPE 5 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
cC ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
r2 C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
N3.64�F DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
,*Vr ----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
1164" DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
--------------DE6215 "WOODEN PEG" —-—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
—---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
-----—------- ----------- ----------------------------
> DE6378 "JET"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
------ I ____]_METAL TO-BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
< J ME L FA CIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
< World HQ@ORBArch . com
<
F-7— <
<
<
<
�,7�71
< 43
000 000
r4 C? 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
<
\A3.64,-r < > > < NA3.64a cD
0� > C�l C-� > < (j)
bo bo > 80 80 > <
>
10f-7ff 10'-T 101-T 10'-T Ric Barbe
GARAGE - GARAGE- GARAGE - GARAGE -
< 28 ?' 2
K <
UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3
<
I—01-1-11 7 —ROOF T.O. PLATE Expires 3/31/2026
20'-4"
<
7=7�71 IIAIAA
1��Av,--
29--0" 29'-0" 29--0" 29'-0" LEVEL L2_��
116'-0" 10'-4"
i i�i N iii RE imm;
LEVEL L
01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 O'l 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O'f
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
118'-8"
4 1'4'
116'-0" oe
_;00 1 ;00
r --—----------- 71
<
1# OF 1 �c F 1 1
BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM <
< ------------------
<
LL
ROOF T.O. PLATE
> 777 BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM
C? > < -4"
> K >
20'
co C:) W-1
co
>
> [Ell <
> UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 UNIT TH3 <
> F__
> BEDROOM > BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM < LEVEL L2
>1 > < 10'-4"
1 > <
> > > <
I > < USCREEN WALL
>
AAA/\A/\A/\A7771� VA/\A/�A4AAA
iffl w
LEVEL Ll
w
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
NOME
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
= I J F 1 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO LO
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO
ROOFTO,PLATE_&� ROOFT.Q.-PLATE
20'-4" 20'-4"
5" 12"
C\j 5" 12"
7:
LO
5" 12" 5" 12"
C14 cli
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------- LEVEL L2 —----- LEVEL_L2_A
10 10'4"
5" 12" 5" 12"
6'SCREEN WALL
C\1
LO
LO
LO
FSCREEN WALL
L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --1 7,
LEVEL Ll LEVEL L
I ERR, 0, T= 0, 01
9 Al I
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
"P') ROOF PLAN 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' �16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
No$ E_ MCI
70 40] 30
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
2,
BUILDING TYPE 6 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
r
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------ — ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS Q
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -1�
I ____]_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET" (3�znqv'2� .
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
_\g,ED ARC�IZ
(j) 9- C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ned. -
41?
........... IZO A,
ROOF T.O. PLATE_��
------------— Expires 3/31/2026
20'-4"
..........
_LEVELL2__��
10'-4"
LEVEL Ll
7777777-7--- .. ................ 7,,�TX�
01-Oi
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
—------------------------------
................:L............................ ...............
............
ROOF T.O. PL
2�T
0
_4
................... ......... ......
...................................
............
...........
cli ......... .....................
.......... ......... ...............
LEVE� L
10�4�
6'SCREEN WALL
HE
LEVEL Ll
f TGRAMM;
.... .......... 01-01,
0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
REAR COLOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
i f
1 gii MEMO
—ROOFT.O. PLATE ROO F-T.0,PLATE
20'-4" 20'-4"
g,
I........... ..........
............
7 v 7� L,
...............................................
..........
04 04
LEVEL_L2__A-,\, —----- LEVELL2_��
10'-4" 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL FSCREEN WALL
E, T-111
.........
LEV%�L
01 LEVEL Ll
0-0
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
0 - LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,1 1 114' 18, 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' �16' DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
4jE_
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" 30 SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
BUILDING TYPE 6 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
cc, ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------------— ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
2 F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.74 G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
334' H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS .0
DE6378 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
I ______METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
[(:—Dl 10-1
Ns Li Ll Li
-------------
>
> 0
0 1 13
< Ric Barbe
< 28 2
F
< ned.
<
< 0 A,
I> < Expires 3/31/2026
<
r4 N%, �<
C? 3
�0 �<
\A3.74 < "kA3.74af
>1 <
> <
> UNIT TH1 UNIT TH1 <
> v
> <
> < C F F 1
> <
> <
> <
> <
A �,AAAA-
-*��---------- ROOF T.O. PLATE
NMI 20'-4"
16-5 1/2" 16-5 1/2"
oe oe
Nonni[]
32'-11"
-/r----------------------------—-------------------------------------------------------------
ZA_
-LEVELL2
10'-4
\A3.74al
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 10, 14' 18, 116'
r........ —LEVEL�--�
0 01
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' 8' 16'
A
mmmEl
-0"
35-7 SCALE: 1/8" 1'
4 1'4`
32'-11"
F 1 1
E110 Id Id ID
31/�
ROOF T.O. PLATE
< 20'-4"
AIN
<
<
co <
cli
co
ZD
UNIT TH1 UNIT TH1 LEVELL2
A
I < 10'-4"
> BEDROOM BEDROOM <
> <
> <
<
<
< ........
7 77777777= < 6'SCREEN WALL
Lij
LEVE L
01
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18' 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION ul 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
MENU
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1 1-01,
r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
�b J) OF 1 1
5" 12" 5" 12"
Lr) L0
NONNI5" 12" 5" 12" ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O._PL T
20'-4" _4�
M
C.0
CN
LO LO
LEVEL L2 LEVELL2
�1�0�4� 10'-4"
5" 12" 5" 12"
6'SCREEN WALL
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F"F`-7 T
L T-
..........
LEVEL Ll
77=777 ...........
vmr
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
u
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
A . 74a
ROOF PLAN 10, 14' 18' 116' LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
30
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0" SCALE: 1
BUILDING TYPE 7 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
00
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
Al CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600 BTR
"DOLPHIN TALES"
CCII ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
"COOL DECEMBER" RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
----------------
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
------------- —-—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
---—------ — ----- —---—------------------------------
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
—-- -- --------------------------
F-------VINYL WINDOW-FRAME COLOR BLACK---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND"
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I ____]_METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
-------- -------------------
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
World HQ@ORBArch . com
cD_\g,�D__Cyz
�1 C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ned..
Zo A,
Expires V31/2026
... ........
......... ..........
ROOFTO._PLATE_��
..............----—-------- ........... 1 11
20-4
........",=
1,11;'N'
..........
mop_
........
..... ...............
LEVEL L2'
—LEVELL1
............... ..........
01-01,
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
-0"
SCALE: 1/8" 1'
F
—---------
ROOF T.O.-PLATE
20'-4"
.... ...............
LEVELUA
10'-4"
FSCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01-0"
REAR COLOR ELEVATION ul 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
F
ROOF T.O. PLAT�_�� ROOF T.O. L�T�
_R
20,_4 20_4
_77,
7
.......... . ......
C.0 ......
................
LEVE L LEVEL L2
0'4� 10'-4"
6'SCREEN WALL
E,
LEVELL_1_�� LEVELL1_& RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
01
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
(N
A 074
LEFT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 0,1 1 1 �4' �8' 16'
� 4) 30
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
BUILDING TYPE 7 COLOR SCHEME 2
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------ ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
1"DOLPHIN TALES" SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383 RESORT BLVD
"COOL DECEMBER"
—--------------------------------------
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ------------------------------ -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
---------- ------—-—-------------------------------------—-----------------------------------------------------------------
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
54'--4 G2 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "AVONDALE BLEND--------------------------------------------
H GARAG__E_D_0ORTO-BE PA—INT—EDF1NIS_HDUNN ED—WARDS------------------------ .0
DE6378 "JET"
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
"JET"
1 101 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- World HQ@ORBArch . com
_\gED ARC1,11
-\UICAT
1 13
Ric Barbe
T_ 28 2
ned.
7 __7 F
> F—T— —T7 < Zo A,
> <
r4 4 < Expires 3/31/2026
> <
>
>1 00 1< 'NA3.84a/
'A%.K C-) <
<
>1 �<
> V 114r,
\A3.84; 0 1 YA3
zC?
J IL <
<
>1 _A�� <
> < i F 1 1
>
UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2
t A A
ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
16-11/2" 181-01, 18'-11/2"
----------------- —------------------ -------------------
54'-3"
------------------------------------ --------- —------------------------------
CN
LEVEL L2_
10'-4"
FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L1 10, 14' 18, 116' _LEVELL1
F] El
SCALE: 1/8" 1'-0"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116'
MEMMMME-1
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
56-11"
54'-3" 14'
...............---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------
F1 --------------- ---- ---------- n
777- 1-77
>
> F
> BEDROOM
> BEDROOM BEDROOM
>
IN
ROOF T.O. PLATE
29-4
co
77 7\
UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2 UNIT TH2
lk -A Ed I== < LEVEL L2
BEDROOM 7 BEDROOM BEDROOM <
�x
> �x 6'SCREEN WALL
v
�x
--------- LEVELLI__��
01-01,
60 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL L2 10, 14' 18' 116' REAR COLOR ELEVATION 10,1 1 114'', 1'81' �1'6'1 ...
SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' 2 SCALE: 1/8"=1'70"'
........ ....
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5" 12" 5" 12"
5" 12" 5" 12"
LO
ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O. L�T
20'-4" 20_4� Apr
5" 12" 5" 12"
. . ....... . .......
C14
LO LEVEL L2 LEVEL L2
10'-4" 10f-4"
5" 12" 6'SCREEN WALL
5" 12"
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - b'SCREEN WALL
L - - - - - - - - - - _ _ j
-------------------- - - - - - - - -
-LEVEL Ll LEVE,�L
0
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
EMEME]
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
CX
BLDG TYPE 8 ROOF PLAN 10, 14' 18' 116' -1 LEFT COLOR_-ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116' RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION 10,11114' 18' 116'
moo-] MM071
70 SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" 1'4' SCALE: 1/8" 1'4'
0� A
UNIT TH2
BUILDING TYPE 8 COLOR SCHEME I
mmmmic
GOLDFIELD
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
------------ ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DET600
"DOLPHIN TALES"
cc, SEC OF S. GOLDFIELD RD AND
A BTR
A2 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL COLOR DUNN EDWARDS DEW383
__"COOL DECEMBER" —-------------------------------------- RESORT BLVD
C1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ------------------------------ -APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA 85219
DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" MEMO:]
D1 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS ot Pd Ch
DE6376 "LOOKING GLASS"
---------- ------—-—-------------------------------------—-----------------------------------------------------------------
D2 STUCCO FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6215 "WOODEN PEG"
El CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "WOLF GREY"
E2 CORONADO STONE BRICK VENEER COLOR "BEAR CREEK" 0
F VINYL WINDOW FRAME COLOR BLACK
G1 FLAT CONCRETE ROOF TILES "SIERRA MADRE"
G2 FLAT CON-CRETE ROOF-TIL-_ES "AVON-_DALE B-LEND-------------------------------------------
H GARAGE DOOR TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS
DE6378 "JET"
I METAL TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378 "JET"
J METAL FASCIA TO BE PAINTED FINISH DUNN EDWARDS DE6378
--'-'JET" ——-—--------------------------------------------------------------------- World HQ@ORBArch . com
g,�D__Cyz
_\�l C
1 13
Ric Barbe
28 2
ned.. -
Zo A,\�
Expires V31/2026
i F
............
........... ROOF T.O. PLATE
20'-4"
-----LEVEL L2
..I........
LEVEL Ll
0'-0"
FRONT COLOR ELEVATION 10, 14' 18, 116'
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
F 1 1
ME
......... ROOF T.O. PLATE
C14
LEVEL L
10,_
4
USCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll
01
10,1 1 1 14'� 1 8' 16'
REAR COLOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8"=1'70"
........ ....
i F
ROOF T.O. PLATE ROOF T.O. PLAT
7 U_��
�L� 2 _4
........ 20-4�
"Y
F_
C14
............ Z, ................
LEVE L LEVE L
1 0�
4� 1 0�
_4�
6'SCREEN WALL 6SCREEN WALL
LEVEL Ll LEVEL Ll
\------- ---- ------
01
-0.
RE-ZONING SUBMITTAL
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28,2023 ORB #: 23-206
10, 14' 18' 116' 10,1 1 114' 18' 116'
LEFT COLOR-ELEVATI-ON RIGHT COLOR ELEVATION
4)
SCALE: 1/8" l'-O" SCALE: 1/8" l'-O"
BUILDING TYPE 8 COLOR SCHEME 2
f* UJA L L L E C-:;E N FD
rol vIEuJ FENCE (FREF. DET,41L 2, SHEET CL5-5)
ro' f=,4FlTI,4L VIEW FENCE (FEF. F-)ET,41L ro, SHEET CL5=5) 9KDCFS G)_ITff_DMPNDFE33TB_\0
AFPCHEJJ�ClCN AR��EIE219
Immmommoommommommm ro' IDECOfR4TIVE THErlE UJ,4LL OREF. IDET,41L 3, SHEET CL5-5)
E VEHICUL,4f;,' G,4TE OREF, DET,41L a, SHEET CL5-5)
Li Li !Lj
.......... _7m
C6
Ism_ an, on, Imll SO 12'm
5' TU5ULAfR STEEL f=OOL B,4FfR1EF, OREF. DET,41L 5, 5HEET
:1
0___W
0 0
..... . ...... CL5 0
F_ -1
E
h ------- v -- ---------- -- --- ------
--------------------
----------
ID IT, 0 < .4' WELIDED WIRE E)OG f=,4fR< FENCE OREF. DET,41L 0, SHEET
v
_ 0
_[-------- ---------
7F Lil �F F\, :�-, -\T
(D E) G
mommmmummummmmummum ro' RE,4fR f=ATIO W,4LL OREF. E)ET,41L -1, 5HEET CL5-5)
V v v
A A A
w w w m
< EXISTING FIERI�IETEiR UJ,4LL
R
Ji
I - -_ -1—EL L-
�UA JAALJLLLLL
A A A A A A A A A A 0 1 E_T
NEW t'l0NUI"lENT 5Ir_:rN,4GE UNDEF, 5Ef=,4R,4TE FERtllIT OREF.
DET,41L 1, SHEET CL5-5)
L) ED
_j
\TEL ----- FIEI)ESTR14N G,4TE OREF. DET,41L 5, SHEET CLS-5)
E-1
k
g
Tj- Tj- Tj- TF-45H ENCL05UfRE OREF. E)ET,41L c�, CL5-5 4ND
V\b r I d HCXP OFUAr ch. co m
F E F
4fRCHITECTUR,4L f=L,4N5)
-- - - - - - - - -
----------
2\,
----- ------
-------------- — ------- — -------
...........
MA A
R
-3
-- ------------- RN
NA
------------------------------ ------------
- ------------
X--R
OF :30� 11
----------
------ -----
......... 0
011 ALLLIA
440
RESIDENTIAL COMPANY
001
PC
COLLABORATIVE V
- - --------- v
DE516N 5TUDIO INC.
% I p / /
P 7116 EMT I ST AVENUE,
L ---------------::::
OP 5UITE 103
'OTT5DALE, ARIZONA
5EE LEFT SEELEFT
- — — — — — — — — — —
8525
f=14VED RD.) MEN No " 0 NEI OFFICE: 480-3 47-05 90
f=Rl ATE:
V FAX: 480-656-601)
LL
(FRI P ,
VATE f=14vr=t::) RD�)
All"
1111011
A
1A 8:4
----------- -----
L J
0 0
7_� ------- ---------
L
40",
0 0 - - - - -------- -------
------------------------
Allf
----------O�i ------------ ...........................
amoI
F
!�gr
------ -------
v
,=-, 57
111 EX15TING 5LCC<
KD
E_:
x\
4h,
WALL, TTf=. E�
"gor, omm", mm%
L--------------
----- -------
........
----------- ------ ------ ------
F-71 J r7
ID
LEI
--------------
L
_j
Li LJLJ Li Li !L
_j
0
EE
Li
- ------ ------
Cj�
E
—- —-------
KD
_1 L
0 0
E:-:]
E
-------------------------- --------
(D
tu
7z---- ----- ---
V/
M
mir-1 F-1171 r7 im E_
'D � <
----------------------
E
J.
L L_j
Li L_j;
Li _jl
V/ V
KD
/'D\ F
<
ID ID
L---�j ------------------------------------ ----- —---—-----
C7
ID
mmmmmc
L
ID
E
L
------------
Eel
----------- /'D\
ID-A (D E
0 -1;E_l 10 . ......
I F 'D ---------------
1:0 0
L
iL
Li _j Li
'D ID E] El
bw 1
E) 0 G
--------------
L
-7=7-- __T-1
Ifl
---------------
v
T_-vl7v__
VTv
f7`11 Ll 19-7� jFU____
>
A A A E�_ I
/J
..............
EX16TING ro' 5LOC<
WALL, TTF. :D
E
M ad 3bliftel
z� vatff 4
I
0:: 'Alk
0 0 -0 41.1t
E :1 E
zn�
E —-----
ONE No
zn�
5EE Rlr:;HT
-SEE fRIGHT
_E aM5
L [A 19FU,m
& kg�,,Igit'ggygg ,�ggj, gggggg g��yggggg' iiigigg "Jiggg' 'gg gii 'ggt,�g, iiiiiiiig" m
ggpq%, ggggg ggggk, gg@ ggpg k?g
f 7 grg. ..... .... . �gpggj jjgg�/', g!"If",
f� _"g, �,ggggp "giiiig", ,%Tqgg� gg5q�p, "ggp), ggggg"
Alooll", IK EX16TING (o' 5LOC,<
fiqe6g, gggg MINE, E E E L
f g
WALL, T-T-F.
SCALE: I" E�0'-O" 5CALE; I`=20'=011
LVENY
(3 Gam ED
r
----------
I I F" ll
it
12
0 2 E7, �10 100 0 10' 20' 4ol
NORTE] NORTID
mmmmmc
STEEL 5EAM
CANOPY, PAINTED
DE6315 "JET"
STUCCO FINISH
COLOR DE6212 "CR15P MUSLIN" 9EICFSG0ffFffD�DPNDRBJTEBE)
A9%3EJJA:l(]Kj AR� 85219
PEDESTRIAN ENTRY
Ell Milli
G A T E MASONRY WALL W1 STUCCO FINISH
PRE-CAST PRE-CAST COLOR DE6212 "CRISP MUSLIN" mmmmmG
ONC-RETE CAP -CAST
C PRE
CONCRETE CAP
R /' C6
COW, CONCRETE CAP PILASTER
CORONADO STONE
CORONADO STONE
5RICK VENEER COLOR
"WOLF GREY" ON 5RICK VENEER COLOR EVERY 150'FT- VEHICULAR
"WOLF GREY" ON ALONG MAJOR
24"X24" CMU -ONLY
EMERGENCY
FRONTAGE
24"X2411 cMU
PILASTER GATE
PILASTER ROADS.
PRE-CAST
V-0
CONCRETE CAP TUIBULAR
STEEL PENCE, wrr
PRE A5T
CONCRETE POT METAL TO 5E
PAINTED
STUCCO FINISH DE&3"la "JET"
COLOR DE6211 CORONADO STONE
5R C, RCO OR
"WOLF GREY" ON
PEDESTRIAN ENTRY 24"X24" CMU
ENTf;,:>�� r-IONUr-IENT v I E UJ F Ez-N E GATE COLUMN, TYP. PILASTER V\b r I d HCKP, 0FUAr ch. corn
/j�
5C-4LE: NTS 5CALE: NTS
...............
"Z,
CA
EMERGENCY-ONLY
VEHICULAR
GATE +0
------------------------------ --------------- ------------------------------ --- ......... ............. ......... ............... --------------------- 4,
MA A
R
4"
NA '�
DECORATIVE THEME
WALL
D. AkILLIANCE
RESIDENTIAL COMPANY
1.777,
000000
000000
00 11 0 11 EEC
VEHICULAR PAVERS AT COLLABORATIVE V
ENTRY DE516N STUDIO INC.
PRE-CAST 7116 EMT 15T AVENUE,
CONCRETE CAP SUITE 103
5' SIDEWALK, TYF`. SC-OTTWALE, ARIZONA
CORONADO STONE 85251
51RICK Vr 0 OFFICE: 480-347-0590
"WOLF GREY" ON FAX: 480-656-6012
ENEEIR COLOR Z'� CUR5, TYP.
24"X24" CMU
PILASTER
IDECOF7RATIVE T�4E�,IE WALL WIT�4 COLU�,IN
5C,,4LT=. 1/0" V-011
TUIBULAIR
STEEL FENCE,
METAL TO 5E PRE-CAST CONCRETE
PAINTEI:) CAI= TUIBULAR
DE&3'la "JET" CORONAL.)0 STONE STEEL PENCE
5RIC< VENEER COLOR
"WOLF GREY" ON LOCKING PRE-CAST
24"X24" CMU MECHANISM CONCRETE CAP
PILASTER
mom
24"X2411 cMU
METAL TO 5E
PAINTED
PILASTER
la "JET"
x
A-77�/
CfRETE CAP
PRE-CAST
MASONRY CON
MASONRY
STUCCO FIN15H 5RICK VENEER COLOR
5C_,4LE: NT5 EXPOSED
WALL W1
CORONADO STONE
WALL W1
COLOR "WOLF GREY" ON SMOOTH
DE6211
24"X24" CMU PAINTED
"ANCIENT
EARTHII PILASTER STUCCO FINISH
COLOR DEro2l2
�X/�7
PRE-CAST
CONCRETE MUSLIN
CAP ACCESS15LE
KEY F05
-011
21
SMOOTH PERFORATED
FACE CMU SHEET METAL
10" KICKPLATE
-lDf=-6Tf;;;Zl,4N G;ATE ANID FENCE AT OOL :)TIAL VIEW FENCE
METAL GATE f=f= (o f=,4f;,
5EYOND 41-011 SC_4LIH: NTS 5C_,4Lr=: NTS
SPLIT
FACE f=ATIO WALL
Gmu
10
a"Xa"XI(o" DECORATIVE CMU OMNI=
WALL, SEE NOTES I AND 2 mmmmmc
511DE ELEVATION 5ELOW FOR SPECIFICATIONS
--------------
PRE-CA5T CONCRETE
CAP
3"X23" VIEW SLOT IN GATE 10'-0" AT 3" SQUA
CONCRETE 6INGLE ENCLOSURE METAL FRAME
CAP le'-4" AT DOU5LE
ENCLOSURE _\1 4" O.C, TYP.
PRE-CAST RE 1-1/4" PICKET,
CORONADO STONE
mm sm Emma Em sm 5RICK VENEER COLOR
SOLID METAL DECKING, "WOLF GREY" ON
COLOR TO 5E DUNN 24"X24" CMU
STEEL ENCLOSURE GATE
EDWARDS DE(o3la .00 PILASTER
11JET11
411 Jjy4M 2-d3bitcl
PROVIDE SLOTS Al--------------------- —-—-----—-------—--------- SoeltEr 4 M ad SbAftcl
ED GATE
OPEN 4 CLOSE NO
POSITION TO RECEIVE
CANE 5OLT MENEM=
FfRQNT ELEVATION FLOOR FLAN 14" METAL PLATE,
PAINT TO MATCH NOTES,
(17) F 1. METAL GATE COLOR - DUNN EDWARDS DE6316 "JET" INE M01W,M CF& aM5
0 H F,4 CF- "__��U E345�5 D [DF51GrN _50 5-1- F- 01 `_(__)N 2. PRE-CAST CONCRETE CAP�3AND COLOR - DAVIS, PEWTER aroO
'
[,/-,c _N 3. STUCCO FINISH COLOR -DUNN EDWARDS DE6213 "FINE GRAIN"
74"---tE �N
E�L LCI ON STANDAF�D t'!A,50Nf��-" C);:D: �1= P E31 0< �N (-OLOF�
4_1 v
z
E3 L/"� < O'Ll N T A N:1 C IT] Fu
L\f FAY
(NGamED
'44
Vr=�41C.-ULAFR ENTf;R"r r---;,4TE
TfRAe�4 EN(,-LO5UfRE
6C-ALE: NT6 5C_,4LE: NT5
GPA & PAD Rezoning
Citizen Participation Report
P-23-63-PZ
v!,,2,. r a, y n, ("'.5 Q "I fil'0Q, IW
Submitted to:
City of Apache Junction, Arizona
Submitted on behalf of:
Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC
4915 E. Baseline Rd. #105
Gilbert, AZ 85234
Prepared by:
Iplan COn5URing
3317 S. Higley Road, Suite 114-622
Gilbert, AZ 85297
November 2023
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Citizen Participation Plan is to document and inform citizens,property owners,neighborhood
associations, agencies, schools, and businesses in the vicinity of the site of the application and for the ongoing
process and actions related to this request. Iplan Consulting, on behalf of the property ownership, has initiated a
Major General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Planned Development (PD) rezoning request to amend the existing
land use classification and zoning designation for an 18-acre property located on the east side of Goldfield Road
just south of the US60 Highway in southeast Apache Junction. The intent of the proposed entitlements is to build
a multi-family community on the subject property.
Site Aerial
CONTACT
All questions and/or comments related to this proposal should be directed to:
Iplan Consulting—Greg Davis
3317 S. Higley Rd. #114-622
Phone: (480) 227-9850
Email: Greg@iplanconsulting.com
NOTIFICATION
In order to provide effective citizen participation in regard to this application, the following actions will be taken
to provide adequate opportunity to adjacent landowners or any other potentially affected individuals, agencies, or
organizations to learn of and address any and all real or perceived impacts this proposed overlay may have on
individuals,properties, or the community:
A. A contact list was created and submitted to the City for all property owners within 300 feet of the site
for the purpose of mailing Public Hearing notifications.
B. A neighborhood meeting was held on 10/24/2023. The meeting was held at the Desert Vista RV
Resort Community Room and was open to the public. A meeting notification letter was sent out to all
property owners within 300 feet of the site notifying residents of the meeting time/date, a general
description of the requests being made,as well as contact information should they not be able to attend.
A summary of the meeting is included in this report.
C. A second meeting was held with the residents of the Dolce Vita community on 11/06/2023. The Dolce
Vita residents were notified of the meetiu by the Community Management since this is a rental
neighborhood. About 100 residents attended and a summary of the meeting is included in this report.
D. A Notice of Public Hearing sign(s)will be posted per City regulations on the property at least 15-days
prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing(s) and remain posted through the City Council
hearing(s).
E. A Notice of Public Hearing letter will be sent out by the City Sta to all property owners within 300
feet of the site notifying residents of the meeting per City regulations which is at least 15-days prior
to the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing(s).
SCHEDULE
Formal Filing—07/21/2023
Citizen Participation Plan Initial Submittal—07/21/2023
Neighborhood Meeting Notification— 10/09/2023
Public Neighborhood Meeting— 10/24/2023
Dolce Vita Community Meeting— 11/06/2023
Citizen Participation Final Report— I 1/10/2023
Notice of Public Hearing Sign Posting &Mailing—TBD
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting—TBD
City Council Hearing—TBD
ATTACHMENTS
Notification Map - 300-foot radius
Notification List- 300-foot radius
Neighborhood Meeting Invitation Letter
Neighborhood Meeting Summary
Dolce Vita Meeting Summary
5,1
i verag on C
iolAcIJ — 300' F:)uffer Map
a' Em
lift
SUTHERLAND BEVERLY & LEDI... WARD RONALD J & JACQUELIN...
14571 CROSS LAKE RD 921 S ALEXANDER ST
PINE CITY, MN 55063 GREENVILLE, MI 48838
ELMSTRAND KATHLEEN M LIV ... MILLBRAND DEE & EUGENE JR MCCUBBIN RICHARD D TR
445 LAKE AVE 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 258 3323 COUNTY ROAD 338
WH ITE B EAR LAKE, M N 55110 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 NEW BLOOMFIELD, MO 65063
PETERSON DAVID A GIAUQUE PAULA J FAM LIV TRU... SHERETTE MICHAEL & JANET
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 467 4453 S MCKECHNIE LOOP 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 276
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 PALMER, AK 99645 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
HAGEN DAVID A & LINDA K TRS... HUPPERT PAUL A& BERNICE E... RABBITT SUSAN
PO BOX 460 4255 S MCKECHNIE LOOP 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 277
CASCADE, ID 83611 PALMER, AK 99645 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
OSTBERG CHARLES J & JANIC... ARNT DAVID & CAROL KUNERT DAVE & LINDA
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD #468 5483 WOODBURY DR 30 N 1400TH AVE
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 WOODBURY, MN 55129 ORION, IL 61273
HALVERSON STEVEN D & LAUR... DUEY WILLIAM P & JERRE ANN ... BORNE PAUL T & MARGARET F
W5904 FRONTAGE RD 12910 E 54TH ST 3133 CHARTER OAK RD
MENASHA, WI 54952 KANSAS CITY, MO 64133 EDGEWOOD, KY 41017
GARDNER BARRY& RONDA BURKE VICKI &VAN TASSEL AN
3445 E CLEVE BUTCHER RD 12653 HARRIET LAKE RD
BLOOMINGTON, IN 47401 HIBBING, MN 55746
GUTZMAN RAMONA HUPPERT PAUL A& BERNICE E... OSWALD TIMOTHY J & DIANNA ...
1023 S EGAN AVE APT 2 4255 S MCKECHNIE LOOP 7201 MILKY WAY RD
MADISON, SD 57042 PALMER, AK 99645 BISMARCK, ND 58503
FOLKERS MARK E
18612 SPRINGCREST DR
MINNETONKA, MN 55345
ARNT CAROL J REV TRUST STOCKWELL JOHN VICTOR & ...
5483 WOODBURY DR 114 N WESTCHESTER DR
SAINT PAUL, MN 55129 COLUMBIA CITY, IN 46725
BORNE PAUL T & MARGARET F LOVE MICHAEL W & CHERYL A
3133 CHARTER OAK RD 32581 HOMESTEAD DR
EDGEWOOD, KY 41017 GRANGER, IA 50109
EMOND DENNIS D & MARIA SANGER MARK& CYNTHIA LANDON SAMUEL G & TAMMAR
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 477 111 W PINE RIDGE DR 17084 PHEASANT MEADOW LN
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 POLK CITY, IA 50226 PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
PETCOVIC DEBORAH OLSON KRISTI EGOLF NED & CATHY D
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 478 11081 108TH AVE N 5215 S 100 E-57
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 CHURUBUSCO, IN 46723
NELSON GLENN & JOSEPHINE DECORTE CAROL J CRITES BRIAN & SUSAN
111 4TH AVE SW 21601 MAYFIELD ST 33317 WATERBERRY CIR
PIPESTONE, MN 56164 FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48336 WAUKEE, IA 50263
BACHTOLD BERNARD W & SHA... DEBROUX DAVID & CANDACE SNYDER JERRY N &YVETTE V
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD 302 3517 ROAD 84 TRLR 109E 9414 N NORMANDIE LN
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 PASCO, WA 99301 SPOKANE, WA 99218
MERRIGAN STEVEN D KING JAMES & CAROLYN JENSEN RANDOLPH R & ROSA...
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD UNIT 18... 100 PINNACLE LN APT A 12512 LEYTE ST NE
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 EASLEY, SC 29642 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55449
BLANKERS JERRY A LIVING TR... POOLEY RANDALL J & JOLENE ... FIREBAUGH R SCOTT & DONN...
727 141 ST ST 10012 W TWIN LAKES RD 11449 S NORTHWOOD CIR
LAKE WILSON, MN 56151 RATHDRUM, ID 83858 OLATHE, KS 66061
OLSON DARLENE M BEDWELL DARYL WADE OLSON GERALD L & MARJORIE
682 WESTERGARD RD 349 S FORK DR 602 MARYSLAND AVE
BOTTINEAU, ND 58318 GURNEE, IL 60031 DANVERS, MN 56231
ZIMMERMANN DONALD W & JA... OEPPING VERNON R TRS SCHMEIL PAUL F & MARYLIN L ...
9733 E LOMPOC AVE 4028 LITTLE VALLEY RD 17303 SPANAWAY LOOP RD S U
MESA, AZ 85209 ESTES PARK, CO 80517 SPANAWAY, WA 98387
LITZINGER JOSEPH M & SUSA... STITH KENNETH & ELAINE TRU...25 GOOD ANN G TRS
108 SLEEPY HOLLOW ST GANDESA WAY PO BOX 654
GRAND FORKS, ND 58201 HOT SPRINGS VILLAGE, AR 71[E7:1 SHERIDAN, MT 59749
WEGNER MARION J REV TRUS... KASTE LON & SHELLEY WONG DEAN D & REBECCA A
11330 LAKEVIEW HEIGHTS RD 5838 COUNTY ROAD 12A 20525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE EX
PINE CITY, MN 55063 PISEK, ND 58273 CEDAR, MN 55011
SCHMEIL PAUL F ETAL TRUSTE... LOPEZ DONALD & THERESA WYMA RICHARD LEE & GWEND
17303 SPANAWAY LOOP RD S U... 1723 COUNTY ROAD 29 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD 417
SPANAWAY, WA 98387 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
STEWART ALAN W BASS MARCIA ANN & PATRICK ... BARBER MICHAEL & COLLEEN
521 KAISER RD NW 251 RAINBOW DR# 15148 706 WESTLAND LN
OLYMPIA, WA 98502 LIVINGSTON, TX 77399 NEW LONDON, MN 56273
TAYLOR CHARLES H &AGNES ... DEROWITSCH JIM & ELLEN DAHLKE RICHARD P & SHERYL
PO BOX 9615 PO BOX 345 19572 CLAREMONT CIR
ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87119 GOLD BAR, WA 98251 FARMINGTON, MN 55024
WIGLEY CONNIE LARSEN BRETT D ODEGAARD DONNA
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 364 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 393 16110 55TH ST SE
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 KINDRED, ND 58051
ZAUN MICHAEL &VICKI TRUST VANLEEUWE ROBERT C REV LI... DALEY CYNTHIA A
8829 E LOST GOLD CIR 705 NUESE LN 1398 SHERWOOD CT
GOLD CANYON, AZ 85118 MARSHALL, MN 56258 GURNEE, IL 60031
BREITBACH STEPHEN T & DIAN... ROHDE BARBARA J MARTUCCI CAROLE T
811 FREEDOM CIR 23756 ARENA DR HART RANCH... 32 MEETINGHOUSE CT
HAZEL GREEN, WI 53811 RAPID CITY, SD 57702 SHAMONG, NJ 08088
LANGE THOMAS F MCGOWAN TERRY DOUGHERTY INEZ E
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 489 31329 TOBIAH PL 162 LAKEVIEW DR
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 CASTAIC, CA 91384 SEQUIM, WA 98382
BRAUN GARY &ANNETTE T HERTIG JAMES M & LORRAINE ...
100 ELLSWORTH ST SE 9485 SEBRING DR
SLEEPY EYE, MN 56085 PORTAGE, MI 49002
CRAIGER MICHAEL C & SALLY ... STOUTENBURG FAMILY TRUST HERZOG GERALD A& FRANTZ
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 386 5211 WILLIAMSBURG LN LOT 1... 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 420
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 LEXINGTON, MI 48450 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
DEROWITSCH JIM & ELAINE RIZNER GARY LEE & JULIE KAY... CALLIES CAROL LEE TR
PO BOX 345 1002 7TH ST 5656 BARONSWOOD CIR
GOLD BAR, WA 98251 GRUNDY CENTER, IA 50638 TOLEDO, OH 43615
NOLTON DANIEL ARTHUR SCHMITT BETTY A SCHROEDERJODI &ANDERSO...
23412 BRIER RD 1101 S SCHEUBER RD UNIT 31 1811 8TH ST SE
BRIER, WA 98036 CENTRALIA, WA 98531 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN 56721
ADAMS WILLIAM E & GEORGIA ... HOGG BRYAN A& DEBORAH J
228 LAKE FRONT CT 1016 LESLIE DR
HAMILTON, OH 45013 INNI-iFIL , ON F-BFi
CANADA
BURKE LAURA M REV TRUST DUNSTAN-ADAMS TAMI & PETE... AKTRON LLC
3050 HIDDEN RD 2635 DARTMOUTH DR 3265 S GOLDFIELD RD APT A
BAY CITY, MI 48706 PENTICTON, BC F,--A F-73 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
CANADA
RODERICK LEWIS & SHEILA FAHRNOW JUDITH M TRUST
3270 S GOLDFIELD RD APT 814 3270 S GOLDFIELD RD APT 207
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
TKACHANKO WAYNE R&CARO... MADGEJAMESA SCHMIDT ROBERT E
205 52312 RANGE ROAD 223 5656 BARONSWOOD CIR 153 THAMESVIEW CRES
SHERWOOD PARK, AB T8C 1 B3 TOLEDO, OH 43615 ST MARYS, ON N4X 1 C4
CANADA CANADA
NOLTON DANIEL ARTHUR CURTIS KAY D & GAYLA A REV ... HELSETH AARON
23412 BRIER RD 13796 E LANGTRY LN PO BOX 2208
BRIER, WA 98036 TUCSON, AZ 85747 ELIZABETH, CO 80107
HOAR IRREVOCABLE GRANTO... HELLER BERNICE ANN
3734 CHERRY FLATS RD 3270 S GOLDFIELD RD APT 201
COVINGTON, PA 16917 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
KINNAN FAMILY LTD PSHIP BAM 109 LLC
112 PERRINE RD 3034 ARTHUR ST NE
OWEGO, NY 13827 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418
STURDEFANT JOHN L FELTON ROSEMARY & BRUCE
3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 451 3270 S GOLDFIELD RD APT 107
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
ANDERSEN IVAN C & FLORA LA... KRAMER RAYMOND J & SHARO... WRIGHT JAMES LEE & CHARLO
671 YUCCA RD 5126 KING AVE W 101 FLINTSTONE DR UNIT A
ELK HORN, IA 51531 BILLINGS, MT 59106 WAVERLY, IA 50677
SORENSEN VERDON N & B LEE... WACKER ROBERT F & KATHLE... DAVIDSON GARY L & DIANE M
1 SIMPSON PL 17362 SUNRAY CIR SW 4880 WOODLAND DR NW
SHENANDOAH, IA 51601 PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 HACKENSACK, MN 56452
HISEK RONALD & BETTY
4121 JARMANN LN
SHAKOPEE, MN 55379
FELTON BRUCE D KARTES CORINE
3270 S GOLDFIELD RD 107 6068 88TH AVE SE
APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 DICKEY, ND 58431
MCMAHON PAMELA K BARKLEY ANDREA & BLAKESL...
9902 E KIOWA AVE 1506 OAK DR SPC 108
MESA, AZ 85209 VISTA, CA 92084
GOETHALS ROBERT M WINNIKE ROBERT H
18784 E 40TH ST 605 5TH ST
COAL VALLEY, IL 61240 WEST POINT, IA 52656
FASSLER JOHN A TRUST KELSEY STEPHEN L
86 PALMYRA RD UNIT 6863 HANNEGAN RD APT A
STERLING, IL 61081 EVERSON, WA 98247
OLSEN RECKER/GUADALUPE P... KLOCKE DOUGLAS & PAULA SMITH HAROLD L & PEGGY J
5235 E SOUTHERN AVE APT Dl... 2965 HARRIS AVE 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 500
MESA, AZ 85206 ROCKWELL CITY, IA 50579 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119
MHC DOLCE VITA LLC LENARDSON DAVID H &JUDIT... THEISEN WILLIAM
917 W WASHINGTON MS 316 3710 S GOLDFIELD RD LOT 501 647 N WISCONSIN ST
CHICAGO, IL 60607 APACHE JUNCTION, AZ 85119 PORT WASHINGTON, WI 53074
SCHOTT GERALD J & CYNTHIA ... SCHMITT RICKY A& BETH A RE... NOTT BRENDA ELIZABETH & M...
513 N MUNDT AVE 1640 FAIRSIDE DR 411 100 SAGHALIE RD
HARTFORD, SD 57033 SANDWICH, IL 60548 VICTORIA, VI LILA LA1
CANADA
1plan Consulting
AA III
Silveray on Goldfield Neighborhood Meeting Summary:
Golden Vista RV Resort—October 24, 2023
Attendees:
Applicant: Greg Davis—Iplan Consulting
Jason Barney—Property Owner
John Hartman—Property Owner
City: Kelsey Schattnik—City Planner
Neighbors: See sign-in sheets
Meeting started at approximately 10:05 AM.
Mr. Davis welcomed everyone, explained that the purpose of this meeting was to present the proposal of
the landowners to modify the General Plan classification and the rezoning designation to allow for the
development of a multi-family residential project. Mr. Davis explained what the current GP/zoning
permitted in terms of uses (i.e. regional hospital, restaurants, hotels, offices, etc.) and then described the
proposed multi-family project including access, circulation, open space/amenities, architecture, and then
walked through several of the typical concerns brought up in similar projects. Mr. Davis then explained
the approval processes and the expected timeframes associated with each phase of the process before
asking if any of the attendees had any questions or comments. Below is a summary of questions and
answers portion of the meeting. Please note that this list is meant to capture the most pertinent questions
of the neighborhood, but similar questions, comments, and/or discussions have been combined or
omitted and the responses have been summarized for brevity.
Q: Question
R: Response
Q: What is the water source for the project?
R: Mr. Davis replied that although water is a hot issue right now in the state, this site is already
accounted for by the City which is the water provider. Furthen-nore, the proposed residential use
will need much less water than the current approved uses.
Q: What does the Traffic Analysis take into account? Does it include all the homes planned to the
south?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the traffic study looks at both existing and planned traffic generation and
compares how the current use will compare to the proposed use and then makes recommendations
based on the ability for the local roads to accommodate the projected traffic.
Q: What road improvements will be made?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the City will dictate what improvements need to be made and we expect some
level of improvements for Goldfield Road.
Q: Please clarify where the entries and exits are? We prefer them north of our entry.
R: Mr. Davis went back to the appropriate slide and pointed them out. All of our access points are
north of the existing access point for Golden Vista.
Q: Will this property have an HOA? How will it be kept nice?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the project will have a POA and the owners have the incentive and
responsibility to maintain the property to a high degree.
Q: Can you make the units along Goldfield single story?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the product proposed is only two story. He also reiterated that the current
zoning allows 45-feet (3 or 4 stories) and by proposing 2-stories was a fair compromise.
Q: We would like to see this site be a City Park. Can the City buy it?
R: Mr. Barney replied that a lot of work goes into locating City parks and this is not the right place for
one. He also stated that the current plans were not for a park and thus the proposal never
contemplated that use. Mr. Davis stated that City parks need to be more centralized to serve the
most residents.
Q: Can the project be built as a golf course?
R: Mr. Barney stated that was not a viable use here on only 18 acres.
Q: Can you have the project open space along Goldfield?
R: Mr. Barney replied that the open space needs to serve the project residents, thus needs to be
centralized.
Q: How will this affect property values?
R: Mr. Barney replied that although any/every project can have some impact on property values, this
proposal would likely protect them more than the current commercial zoning. Mr. Davis stated that
since our project was a rental product, no appraiser would use our project to establish land values
for their homes.
Q: Can you change the gray color with an earth tone or paint a mural of the mountain on the buildings
along Goldfield?
R: Mr. Davis replied that we can look at changing the building colors to be more earthen tones.
Q: What is the distance between buildings?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the front setback was 20-feet and distance between buildings was I 0-feet.
Q: Can these be re-rented as AirB&Bs?
R: Mr. Davis replied that no, these are end user rentals only and no tenant can sublet for that purpose.
Q: What is the minimum rental length?
R: Mr. Davis replied that these are intended to be long-term rentals which are typically one-year in
length.
Q: Are these rentals subsidized?
R: Mr. Davis replied that no, these are market-rate rental homes.
Q: Will the project contribute to the City for parks and road/sidewalk maintenance?
R: Mr. Davis replied that yes, the project will pay impact fees to the City as well as pay taxes for on-
going road maintenance.
Q: Are pets allowed?
R: Mr. Davis replied that yes,pets are allowed and the project includes amenities for them.
Q: Can you bring in a nice restaurant?
R: Mr. Barney replied that they don't believe a high end restaurant would choose this location over the
US60/Signal Butte commercial center or the future one to the east at US60/North-South freeway.
Q: Can you use your influence to get ADOT to widen US 60 to account for the future N/S freeway?
R: Mr. Barney mentioned his involvement with the Pinal Partnership group and their efforts to work
with ADOT to make that happen. He said getting that done will happen, but it is likely decades
away.
Q: Will there be a sound wall along US 60?
R: Mr. Davis replied that as of now, no sound wall is planned,but that would look into that further.
Q: The project is too dense. Can you build something else.
R: Mr. Davis shared that the project, at—15 DU/acre was lower than many multi-family projects and
the site is retaining 15% open space in addition to the parking and drive aisles, and with only 2-
story buildings, we disagree. Furthermore, the Golden Vista RV resort is actually denser at almost
25 DU/acre.
Q: Can you use bushes or cacti instead of trees along Goldfield(to preserve the view)?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the ownership would be fine with that but it was the City's call.
Q: Can you use build something temporary along Goldfield to demonstrate the proposed height?
R: Mr. Davis replied that we probably can't build anything, but we could use color balloons to illustrate
the heights discussed today.
Q: If you sell to someone else, what happens to the proposal?
R: Mr. Davis replied that, if approved, the zoning would remain in place for whomever bought the land
and if they wanted to change it, they would have to go back through the entire rezoning process.
Seeing no other questions or comments, Mr. Davis thanked everyone for attending the meeting,
reminded them that his and the City Planner's contact information was available and then adjourned the
meeting.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 11:22 AM.
Project: Silveray on Goldfield Meeting Date-, 10/24/2023 Location-, Golden Vista RV Park
Time Started-, 10:00am Time Ended: :
ATTENDANCE SIGN-IN
NAME—(please Lrint) ADDRESS EMAIL (02tional)
a(a 616M
D4ia 1'4�n�015e kle6��,YMA I'/ eoOp7q
2,
t
all e� kefvx'�4
3
__�?�Oj �IV�4 e,
_Z,MA/
443S8
I nAL
3S(,V
NAME— (please peint) ADDRESS ZIP
e, 1 76 '
cs,
4 -7
Teo 4 W Iro-71
41L
2, 2,
s co4f 7ff'41 0 L o+ 9 5 E,16
bq
NAME—(please print) ADDRESS ZIP
'n
KAw-
r2 Fj-e
17
T)to�e
rd A1411 e (VI�ICI�
kill
ion 7 2-
AuWr=� /",Or-sscq
�AL� JAL" cx�t' t ( q .6 m I
Zralle:f
4-6
20 nyl Ou Myth
js (7
A!NO/, Xt,ol ;I
1-40,71 7k
----------
NAME -(please print) ADDRESS EMAIL
4
P LIA ,
4-4
VAJW
c 6
3
!�;-2 V61
a) ;4�,a �,r Fojuf-
6cn o 4t, e,,,(,6 -xK7f-e rn a,I
e_j 4
Y) V\ N ��ar-ov)
k,
A, ��LCO 41-1 t(-��-A ch
1114V d, a
2 �9 J a L71L G
7
L4�2 -71 C) 5 , 6- c f),/IF AMP F- 04-z7Z, Cof,
r)eq.. A� )-to V1
yu,if, SAY J-P-r :tk-3 3 ol
J-e-aA - nJ 'e-Pr t/e cog)cc,2
'2 1 (
ep
1plan Consulting
AA 111
Silveray on Goldfield Neighborhood Meeting Summary:
Dolce Vita—November 06, 2023
Attendees:
Applicant: Greg Davis—1plan Consulting
John Hartman—Property Owner
City: Kelsey Schattnik—City Planner
Neighbors: —100 (undocumented)
Presentation Started at approximately 10:05AM
Mr. Davis welcomed everyone, explained that the purpose of this meeting was to present the proposal of
the landowners to modify the General Plan classification and the rezoning designation to allow for the
development of a multi-family residential project. Mr. Davis explained what the current GP/zoning
permitted in terms of uses (i.e. regional hospital, restaurants, hotels, offices, etc.) and then described the
proposed multi-family project including access, circulation, open space/amenities, architecture, and then
walked through several of the typical concerns brought up in similar projects. Mr. Davis then explained
the approval processes and the expected timeframes associated with each phase of the process before
asking if any of the attendees had any questions or comments. Below is a summary of questions and
answers portion of the meeting. Please note that this list is meant to capture the most pertinent questions
of the neighborhood and that similar questions, comments, and/or discussions have been combined or
omitted and the responses have been summarized for brevity.
Q: Question
R: Response
Q: Is this a rental project?
R: Mr. Davis replied that yes, this is a for-rent residential project.
Q: What will the rents be?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the actual rents won't be known until the project is closer to opening and
guessed that they would start at $1,000 or so. Mr. Hartman corrected Mr. Davis stating they would
be quite a bit higher than that, likely above $1,800 a month.
Q: Who owns Resort Blvd.?
R: Mr. Hartman replied that our group owns Resort Blvd. and Dolce Vita gains access via easement.
Q: What road improvements will be made?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the City will dictate what improvements need to be made based on our Traffic
Report and we expect some level of improvements for Goldfield Road and potentially Resort Blvd.
Q: Can you move the access points to the west?
R: Mr. Davis went back to the appropriate slide and pointed the access points out noting that most were
already pretty far west which the exception of the northeast parcel which is cut-off from the rest of
the project thus needs its own access points.
Q: How can you ensure people will not park along Resort Blvd.?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the project will have a POA that will prohibit parking along Resort Blvd. and
the owners have the incentive to keep the entry road open and attractive.
Q: Can you make the units along the perimeter single story?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the product proposed is only two story noting that most have the garage on
the lower level requiring a two-level design. He also reiterated that the current zoning allows 45-
feet(3 or 4 stories) and by proposing 2-stories was a fair compromise.
Q: Can you prohibit children from living here?
R: Mr. Davis replied that he didn't believe it was legal to do that here and that the project was not
designed to be attractive to families as there is very limited family services in the area.
Q: Can you move the playground?
R: Mr. Davis said they would look at that and could potentially move it to the west open space area.
Q: Can you move the primary amenity area? That will be a party area.
R: Mr. Davis replied that the primary amenity area needs to serve the project residents, thus needs to be
centralized and that the pool facility will close at I Opm to minimize its use as a party location.
Q: Will the construction traffic use Resort Blvd.?
R: Mr. Davis replied that the construction traffic would mostly come from Goldfield Road as we are on
the hook for maintenance of Resort Blvd. so will work to minimize use of that road for construction
traffic.
Seeing no other questions or comments, Mr. Davis thanked everyone for attending and then adjourned
the meeting.
Meeting adjourned at approximately 10:58 AM.
Leo Lew
County Manager
PINAL COUNTY
October 171h 2023
City of Apache Junction
Development Services Department
300 E Superstition Blvd
Apache Junction, AZ 85119
Re: Proposed Silveray at Goldfield Major General Plan Amendment
Dear Kelsey:
The Pinal County Development Services Department is aware of the proposed multi-family development
proposed within the area of the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan. County staff has prepared comments
regarding this proposal and would not offer our support of this recommendation.
Staff finds the request to convert the 18-acre subject site may detract from prime commercial parcels
South of US-60. The location of these parcels having access to an arterial roadway and a major highway
offer potential for higher levels of traffic consistent with retail requirements and exceeding the trip
generation typical of a multi-family development. The presence of such roadways may encourage the
market area of potential commercial opportunities to support communities that are more distant and
may attract revenue to Apache Junction.
Proximity of existing residential uses to the site promotes a pedestrian scaled commercial development
that may support existing residential development on both the West and East sides of the proposed
development. Such commercial parcels would also support expansion of additional multi-family projects
to the South, which are supported at present by the Pinal County Comprehensive Plan. Development of
this multi-family project to the south of the General Commercial land-use designated parcels would be
consistent with the High Density Residential land-use designation present within the Pinal County
Comprehensive Plan. Staff would be amicable toward multi-family development south of the proposal
area provided commercial designations remain that would support residential growth.
Please feel free to contact me regarding staff comments and our position on this matter. Staff
appreciates the opportunity to provide input regarding this case.
Sincerely,
Patrick Roberts
Senior Planner
Pinal County Development Services
COMMUNrTY DEVELOPMENT
PLAWNG MVISM
85 N Florence St,Florence,AZ 85132 1'520-866-6442 FREE 888-431-1311 F 520-866-6435 www,pinaIcountyaz,gov
12/14/23,10-09 AM [External]SPRSAZEA-Under Review City of Apache Junction General Plan Amendment-Silveray at Goldfield-Kelsey Schott_
[External] SPRSAZEA - Under Review: City of Apache Junction General Plan Amendment
- Silveray at Goldfield
Boyden, Holden <Holden.Boyden@funUen.com>
Mon 9/11/2023 8,49 AM
ToXelsey Schatmik <kschattnik@apachejunctio�iaz.gov>
Cc:AZMetroRelo <AZMetrciReIo@Iumen,com>
0 1 attachments(2 MB)
Utility Map I.pdf,
Date:08/25/2023
Attn: Kelsey Schattnik
Thank you for your project notification. LUMEN has reviewed your utility notice regarding P-479235 AZ I Sliveray
at Goldfield-S Goldfield Rd&Dolce Vita at Superstition Falls,Apache Junction,AZ("Project"), In response to your
inquiry please find the enclosed drawings indicating the approximate location of the project limits.
X LUMEN has facilities within your proposed construction area.The plans submitted are under
review by our LUMEN Field Engineer(s).Currently,the estimated completion date of review is 09/25/2021
LUMEN has facilities within your proposed construction area.Please find the enclosed drawings
indicating the location of the LUMEN facilities.Once you have completed your review,please respond
back if LUMEN facilities appear to be in conflict.A LUMEN engineer will be assigned when engineering
plans are ready for review,
LUMEN does not have facilities within your proposed construction area.
LUMEN has facilities within your proposed construction zone,but it has been determined that no
relocation will be necessary, However,due to the proximity of your project to our facilities,a LU MEN
representative will be required on-site when construction begins.
The information provided in your initial request is insufficient to determine if the location of your
proposed construction will conflict with LUMEN facilities.Please provide additional detailed location
maps,drawings(PDF preferred),and description for further conflict review.
Please contact your�tate One Call prior to construction,
Any changes or additions to the project plans or parameters should be submitted to LeLocations@ umen.com.
L_
Note:the location(s)of facilities shown on drawings you receive from us, are only approximate. LUMEN hereby
disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy of this information. Please contact LeLocations@
lumen.com regarding
the above-mentioned project if you should have any questions. Please reference the file number P-479235 AZ
with any future communications,
Important Notice-For the States listed below,please add Lej_ocationsft�rightsp
Sed.,corn to your distribution list
for inquiries and updates regarding local facilities.
(AL,AR,GA,It,IN,KS,LA, MI,MO,MS, NC, NJ,OH,OK,PA,SC,TN,TX,VA,WI)
Thank you for your cooperation!
Holden Boyden (Hezilim)
Business Analyst
Relocations Department
about:blank 1/3
12/14/23,10-09 AM [External]SPRSAZEA-Under Review:City of Apache Junction General Plan Amendment-Silveray at Goldfield-Kelsey Schad-
Holden.Boyjen@ lu men.c_om
"We have combined!!To better serve everyone,there is now a single email inbox for LUMEN,One team is
monitoring both national and local network relocations&road moves. Please add relocation c
I@IyMgn,_QM to
your contacts list for inquiries,updates, and use it for all future notifications.*
From:Wagner, Kevin <kwagner@congruex.com>
Sent:Friday,August 25, 2023 1:15 PM
To:relocations<relocations@centurylink.com>
Subject:,Fw:City of Apache Junction General Plan Amendment-Silveray at Goldfield
CAUTIOR This email originated outside of Lumen Technologies.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
the sender and know the content is safe.
From:owner-azreview@lxdnp 2k.corp tranet<owner-_azreView@lxdnp 2k.corp ntranet>on behalf of Kelsey
In
Schattnik<kschattntk@apachejlLnctionaz.gov>
Sent:Thursday,August 24,2023 3:08 PM
Subject:City of Apache Junction General Plan Amendment-Silveray at Goldfield
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization.Do not click links or open attachments unless
ou recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
CAUTION:This email originated outside of Lumen Technologies.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Neighbors and Interested Parties:
Submitted for your review and comment is a general plan amendment request within the City Of Apache Junction
(Case No. P-23-64-GPA). In accordance with state and city requirements,we are submitting this proposal to you as
part of the 60-day review process.
Please review the materials provided and convey your comments to Kelsey Schattnik,Senior Planner,via the
contact information below,on or prior to October 23,2023.The City of Apache Junction values your comments
and thanks you for your input.Thanks!
All documents can be accessed through the below link:
hAns,Udrive gg-ogLe—co—m-Ld—rl-v-elfo—ide—rsL'3d5lDb—h Fwcb!Lt���Mnih—aring
Best,
Kelsey
Kelsey Schattruk,LEED Green Associate
Senior Planner I Development Services Department
City of Apache Junction,AZ
(480)474-5085
abouttilank 213
12/14/23,%09 AM (External]SPRSAZEA-Under Review City of Apache Junction General Plan Amendment-Silveray at Goldfield-Kelsey Schatt_
kkschartnikcDap chejuncrionazg)v
C_-a-- — �_
Hours:Monday—Thursday 7arn-tiptn;closed on Fridays.
This communication is the property of Lumen Technologies and may contain confidential or privileged
information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.
about,,blank T3
LUMEN Relocate Utility Map
E Z Ave E 30th VO" .......
Vig
Doice Vita at Supersti
Ig
-----------------------------E-J a s p er-D r--------
------- A D or]c0`1 V it or at,
E fronstone Dr
E Hawks Eye Dr
DC;TJ�'V-Wa atSUperstition Falls P
k
46
VA
'a
CD
titto
'a Dolce Vita 3t 1%41 17 f ;Z
0
0
x E Emerald Dr
CL
Z r
ca A'e
0 0
E Diamond Dr C
0
Co N
1> 0
E Cinnebar Dr
t
t3 f
E Beryl Dr %
E Beryl Dr Z
X
E Aquamarine Dr Doice Vita at Superstition Falls
E Mother Lode Dr
E Nightdigger Dr
9/11/2023, 10:33:05 AM 1:4,514
Local Copper LIG Route ---- Underground,ln Construction ---- Underground,ln Construction 0 0.05 0.1 0.19 Mi
---- Underground,ln Service ---- Underground,ln Service Underground,in Service 0 0.07 0.15 0.3 km
Fiber Cables Fiber Routes
Earl Community Maps Contributors, @ OpenStreetMap, Microsoft,
Aerial,ln Service Aerial,in Service Esri, HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph,GeoTechnologies, Inc,METI/NASA,
USES, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census
Bureau,USDA
@ map data Lumen @ 1992—2023 TomTom
INTERNAL USE ONLY:This map data is for internal LUMEN use only and is NOT to be disseminated outside of LUMEN without authorization from RISK MANAGEMENT Dissemination ofthis data outside of LUMEN without authorization will be considered a violation of company policy.
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No. 13.
File ID: 24-422
Sponsor: Kelsey Schaftnik Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Presentation, discussion, public hearing and consideration of Ordinance No. 1547 (case
P-23-63-PZ), requested by Jason Barney and John Hartman with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe
Properties LLC, and represented by Greg Davis with 1plan Consulting for a proposed planned
development rezoning of 18 acres located at the southeast corner of US-60 and Goldfield
Road from General Commercial by Planned Development("B-1/PD")and B-1/PD to High
Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned Development("RM-2/PD"). (This is the
companion case to Major General Plan Amendment Case P-23-64-GPA).
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City ofApache Junction
7
Development Services Department
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
STAFF MEMO
Date: May 8, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Through: Bryant Powell, City Manager
Rudy Esquivias, Development Services Director
Sidney Urias, Planning Manager
From: Kelsey Schattnik, Senior Planner
Case
Numbers : P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
Subject: May 21, 2024, City Council Public Hearing:
P-23-63-PZ: Proposed Rezoning of approximately 18 acres
from General Commercial by Planned Development ("B-1/PD")
(ordinance No. 1144) and B-1/PD (Ordinance No. 1146) to
High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned
Development ("RM-2/PD")
P-23-64-GPA: Proposed Major General Plan Amendment to
redesignate approximately 18 acres from Commercial to High
Density Residential
Summary
P-23-63-PZ Is a Planned Development (PD) Rezoning request by Greg
Davis with Iplan Consulting, representing the property owner, Jason
Barney with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC, to rezone
approximately 18 acres from General Commercial by Planned Development
("B-1/PD") (Ordinance No. 1144) and B-1/PD (Ordinance No. 1146) to
High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned Development ("RM-
2/PD") near the southeast corner of the US-60 and Goldfield Road. The
subject site is proposed to be developed with approximately 271 rental
units to be known as Silveray on Goldfield.
P-23-64-GPA Is a proposed Major General Plan Amendment of APNs 103-01-
0110, 103-01-0130, 103-01-0140, 103-01-0150, 103-01-0160, 103-01-0170
and 103-01-0180, located near the southeast corner of Goldfield Rd.
and US-60, from Commercial to High Density Residential (40 du/ac) .
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-Pz & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing and Recommendation
Due to the requirements for a Major General Plan Amendment, the
Planning and Zoning Commission held two (2) public hearings for these
cases . The General Plan requires that these meetings be held in two
(2) different locations .
The Planning and Zoning Commission held the first public hearing for
P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA on March 26, 2024 in the Superstition Fire
and Medical District' s Board Room located at 565 N. Idaho Road. Please
see the attached staff report and exhibits presented to the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
At this meeting, Staff made a presentation and introduced the
preliminary recommended conditions of approval for the Planned
Development Rezoning and Major General Plan Amendment. The applicant
also made a presentation and answered questions asked by the
Commission.
Eight (8) residents of Golden Vista Resort spoke during the meeting.
Their primary concerns included:
1 . The two-story height of the development
2 . Water pressure concerns
3 . Increased density
4 . Property value concerns
5 . Maintaining commercial land
6. Increased traffic
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a second public hearing for P-
23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA on April 23, 2024 . Both Staff and the applicant
gave a presentation. Please see the attached staff report and exhibits
presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Five (5) residents spoke during the meeting. Their primary concerns
included:
1 . The two-story height of the development
2 . The desire for commercial development at this site.
3 . Increased density.
Ultimately, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend
approval of P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA, subject to the conditions of
approval that were recommended in the Staff Report, dated April 23,
2024, with the elimination of Project Specific Condition Numbers 1 &
2 .
Project Specific Condition No. 1 would have required the developer to
reserve 5 acres on the north side of Resort Boulevard to remain
commercial. Project Specific Condition No. 2 provided a list of
General Commercial Uses that would not be permitted.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-Pz & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
The commissioners who voted in favor of the proposed development
discussed the following:
1 . The benefit of developing a historically vacant property.
2 . The benefit of adding additional rooftops .
3 . Whether this site is viable for commercial use and noted that the
approved development plan has been in existence for 20+ years and
has yet to be developed.
4 . Recent trends of commercial development.
5 . Not wanting to keep commercial property that may never develop.
The commission members who voted against the proposal discussed:
1 . The desire of an ownership product at this site as opposed to a
rental product.
2 . The lack of desire to continue changing the voter approved
General Plan.
3 . The concern of changing commercial to residential.
4 . Concerns regarding the lack of affordability with market rate
housing.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval of cases P-23-63-PZ and P-23-64-GPA
subject to the full list of conditions found within the Planning and
Zoning Commission staff report, including project specific conditions
1 and 2, which are described below:
1) Lot Numbers 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the existing Superstition Falls
Subdivision shall remain zoned General Commercial by Planned
Development ("B-1/PD") .
2) The permitted uses in the B-1 zoning district shall be those
which are permitted by Zoning Ordinance, Article 1-5, § 1-5-3:
Non-Residential Use Regulations, except that the following
uses shall not be permitted herein:
Motor vehicle dealer (new or used vehicles; and similar
uses) ;
Thrift store/used merchandise sales;
Medical marijuana facilities and dual licensees;
Swap meets;
Tattoo and/or piercing services;
Death care services/funeral homes;
Commercial parking lots and garages;
Check cashing stores;
Psychiatric and substance abuse facilities;
Nursing and residential care facilities;
Homeless shelter;
Community food and relief services;
Commercial equestrian boarding, rentals, arenas and
academies;
Cemeteries/mausoleum;
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
Scenic and sightseeing terminal/parking;
Assisted living facility;
Group care home;
Multi-family residential (including apartments,
condominiums or townhouses) ;
Similar uses designated by the Development Services
Director not conducive to the City' s and community' s goals
and objectives for successful community commercial
development.
City Council Work Session - May 6, 2024
On May 6, 2024, the City Council reviewed cases P-23-63-PZ and P-23-
64-GPA at a work session. This item was for presentation and
discussion only. The Council primarily had questions regarding the
proposed size and location of commercial zoning being recommended by
Staff, why Pinal County was opposed to the General Plan Amendment, and
details as to why surrounding residents were opposed to the project.
Major General Plan Amendment
Please note that a major general plan amendment requires a 2/3
majority vote (5 out of 7) of the Council for approval . If the general
plan amendment is not approved, the rezoning case cannot be approved.
Three motions are required:
• Major General Plan Amendment (Resolution No. 24-09)
• Planned Development Rezoning (ordinance No. 1547 and Resolution
No. 24-08)
Attached:
- Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Reports and attachments (March 23, 2024 &
April 23, 2024)
- Resolution No. 24-09
- Ordinance No. 1547
- Resolution No. 2408
-Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
ORDINANCE NO. 1547
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AMENDING THE APACHE
JUNCTION, ARIZONA, ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING THE
ZONING DISTRICT MAP, CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA,
CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR A
PROPOSED NEW RENTAL COMMUNITY TO BE NAMED "SILVERAY"
LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING CASE P-
23-63-PZ FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL BY PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT ("B-1/PD") AND B-1/PD TO HIGH DENSITY
MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
(NNRM-2/PD") ; ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THAT CERTAIN
DOCUMENT TITLED "LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND ZONING
CONDITIONS OF CASE NO. P-23-63-PZ; REPEALING ANY
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY.
WHEREAS, the Silveray subject site is comprised of seven (7)
parcels : Pinal County Assessor Parcel Nos . 103-01-0110, 103-01-
0130, 103-01-0140, 103-01-0150, 103-01-0160, 103-01-0170, 103-
01-0180; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is currently located within the
Superstition Falls Commercial Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is bifurcated by a privately
owned roadway known as "Resort Boulevard" and is currently
governed by two previously adopted ordinances in 2000, Ordinance
No. 1144 and Ordinance No. 1146; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No . 1144, which governs the parcels
north of Resort Boulevard, approved a development plan for a
commercial center, which has yet to be fully developed; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1146, which governs the parcel south
of Resort Boulevard, approved a 60-bed hospital campus, which
has also yet to come to pass; and
WHEREAS, the applicant applied for a rezoning of all seven
parcels to construct approximately 271 rental units; and
WHEREAS, on April 23, 2024, the Apache Junction planning
and zoning commission voted 4 : 3 to recommend approval of
rezoning case P-23-63-PZ; and
ORDINANCE NO. 1547
PAGE 1 OF 3
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R. S . § 9-462 . 01 (1) , the city
council, before adopting any zoning ordinance or text amendment
of general applicability, shall consider the probable impact the
proposed zoning ordinance or text amendment would have on the
cost to construct housing for sale or rent; and
WHEREAS, the city council has determined the adoption of
this ordinance or text amendment will have no negative impact on
the cost to construct housing for sale or rent as delineated
under A.R. S . § 9-462 . 01 (1) ; and
WHEREAS, A.R. S . § 9-802 permits municipalities to enact the
provisions of a code or public record theretofore in existence
without setting forth such provisions in full text as long as
the adopting ordinance is published in full text and at least
one paper copy of the code changes or public record are filed in
the of f ice of the clerk of the municipality and an electronic
copy is accessible on the city' s website and made available for
public inspection.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I IN GENERAL
1 . That the planned development rezoning, as recommended by
the city council in case P-23-63-PZ, is approved with
conditions adopting by reference pursuant to Section 2
below.
2 That certain document entitled "Legal Descriptions and
zoning conditions of case no. P-23-63-PZ", one paper copy
filed in the office of the city clerk and one electronic
copy accessible on the city' s website, with such document
declared a public record by Resolution No. 24-08 of the
City of Apache Junction, is hereby referred to, adopted by
reference and made a part hereof as if fully set out in
this ordinance, pursuant to A.R. S . § 9-802 .
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance or any part of the codes adopted
herein by reference are hereby repealed.
ORDINANCE NO. 1547
PAGE 2 OF 3
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion
of this ordinance or any part of the codes or regulations
adopted herein by reference is for any reason held to be invalid
or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF 1 2024 .
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF 2024 .
WALTER "CHIP" WILSON
Mayor
ATTEST:
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RICHARD JOEL STERN
City Attorney
ORDINANCE NO. 1547
PAGE 3 OF 3
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND ZONING CONDITIONS OF CASE
NO . P-23- 63-PZ
1
A) The mayor and council passed Ordinance No . 1547 on May 21,
2024, which approved the planned development rezoning of
the approximately 18-acre property, located at the
southeast corner of US-60 and Goldfield Road, legally
described as follows :
Parcel 1 (103-01-0110) : LOT 1 SUPERSTION FALLCOMMERCIAL CAB
G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 2 (103-01-0130) : LOT 3 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 3 (103-01-0140) : LOT 4 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 4 (103-01-0150) : LOT 5 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 5 (103-01-0160) : LOT 6 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 6 (103-01-0170) : LOT 7 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
Parcel 7 (103-01-0180) : LOT 8 SUPERSTION FALLS COMMERCIAL
CAB G - SLD 066 SEC 35 1N-8E
B) The approval is subject to the following zoning conditions :
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1) All the provisions of the zoning ordinance are
applicable to this case .
2) The development shall reflect substantial compliance and
consistency with the planned development presented with
case P-23-63-PZ, P-23-64-GPA and P-23-65-DR incorporated
by reference herein, and as otherwise specified through
these conditions of approval, to include site layout,
elevations, setbacks, public and private rights-of-ways,
easements and tracts, amenities (including proposed pool
and clubhouse) , perimeter and interior lot separation
walls, model types, landscaping and other improvements .
3) Landscape, screening and irrigation improvements,
planted within a minimum 10-foot-deep strip inside the
2
net property line (but outside of required walls) along
the perimeters of the property, shall be provided in
compliance with the city' s landscape and screening
requirements contained in Apache Junction City Code,
Volume II, Land Development Code, Chapter 1 : Zoning
Ordinance, Article 1-8 : Landscape Regulations . All
required trees shall be 24" box and all required shrubs
shall be 5-gallon in size and a decorative 6-foot-tall
wall shall be constructed on all roadway frontages .
4) Street improvements include but not necessarily limited
to, extension of pavement and the provision of sidewalk,
curb, gutter, streetlights, underground utilities, fire
hydrants, landscaping shall be required as part of this
planned development project, and subject to review and
approval by the city engineer.
5) All applicable permits shall be applied for and plans
shall be designed to current city codes prior to any lot
grading or construction on the lots . Inclusively, all
applicable development fees, including, but not limited
to, public art fees, shall be paid at the time of permit
issuance . Development fees shall be paid on a per unit
basis .
6) All common areas, amenity areas, and tracts within and
immediately adjacent to the proposed development,
including perimeter walls and fences, and interior and
exterior common area landscaping, shall be owned and
maintained in good condition at all times by the owners
or homeowners association of the proposed subdivision.
7) The developer' s engineering shall meet the civil
engineering improvement plans and document requirements,
as outlined in the previously provided pre-application
and review comments and in accordance of the City' s
approved engineering standards that are in effect at the
time of plan submittal .
8) Minor PD modifications or alterations of the approved
architecture designs, floor plans, open space, unit mix,
unit count, clubhouse location or development plan,
shall be administratively reviewed and approved by the
development services director or his or her designee.
3
9) Major deviations or proposed changes from the original
plans associated with this case will require a Major PD
Amendment. The director or his or her designee shall
interpret the proposed modification to be
significant/major, if, in his or her opinion, the
modified project density (i .e . , units per acre) is
proposed to be increased by more than 10%, the quality
of project design is diminished, the types of proposed
land uses are significantly altered and/or the overall
character of the project is contrary to the intent and
spirit of the original city council PD ordinance
approval .
PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1) The maximum height for the site shall be limited to 30-
feet.
2) A reduced rear setback of 8' shall be permitted on the
parcels north of Resort Boulevard.
3) The proposed development will not be age-restricted.
4) Resort Boulevard will remain a private road and will not
be dedicated as public right-of-way.
5) The City will transfer ownership, maintenance, and
payment of all existing streetlights along Resort
Boulevard to the adjacent property owners/commercial
homeowner' s association.
6) The four curb returns along the intersection of
Goldfield Road and Resort Boulevard and Chevron Gas
Station shall be updated to current American
Disabilities Act standards .
7) Concrete sidewalk shall be added from the north existing
access drive heading north to tie into the existing
sidewalk located within the Arizona Department of
Transportation right-of-way as required by the city
engineer.
8) Any other future improvements to existing public
facilities in Goldfield Road will be per city standards
and as required by the city engineer.
4
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No. 14.
File ID: 24-423
Sponsor: Kelsey Schattnik Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Presentation, discussion, public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 24-08, declaring
as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk and entitled "Legal
Descriptions and Zoning Conditions of Case No. P-23-63-PZ;" repealing any conflicting
provisions and providing for severability.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City ofApache Junction
Development Services Department
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
STAFF MEMO
Date: May 8, 2024
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Through: Bryant Powell, City Manager
Rudy Esquivias, Development Services Director
Sidney Urias, Planning Manager
From: Kelsey Schattnik, Senior Planner
Case
Numbers : P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
Subject: May 21, 2024, City Council Public Hearing:
P-23-63-PZ: Proposed Rezoning of approximately 18 acres
from General Commercial by Planned Development ("B-1/PD")
(Ordinance No. 1144) and B-1/PD (Ordinance No. 1146) to
High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned
Development ("RM-2/PD")
P-23-64-GPA: Proposed Major General Plan Amendment to
redesignate approximately 18 acres from Commercial to High
Density Residential
Summary
P-23-63-PZ Is a Planned Development (PD) Rezoning request by Greg
Davis with Iplan Consulting, representing the property owner, Jason
Barney with Olsen Recker/Guadalupe Properties LLC, to rezone
approximately 18 acres from General Commercial by Planned Development
("B-1/PD") (Ordinance No. 1144) and B-1/PD (Ordinance No. 1146) to
High Density Multiple-Family Residential by Planned Development ("RM-
2/PD") near the southeast corner of the US-60 and Goldfield Road. The
subject site is proposed to be developed with approximately 271 rental
units to be known as Silveray on Goldfield.
P-23-64-GPA Is a proposed Major General Plan Amendment of APNs 103-01-
0110, 103-01-0130, 103-01-0140, 103-01-0150, 103-01-0160, 103-01-0170
and 103-01-0180, located near the southeast corner of Goldfield Rd.
and US-60, from Commercial to High Density Residential (40 du/ac) .
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
Planning & Zoning Commission Hearing and Recommendation
Due to the requirements for a Major General Plan Amendment, the
Planning and Zoning Commission held two (2) public hearings for these
cases . The General Plan requires that these meetings be held in two
(2) different locations .
The Planning and Zoning Commission held the first public hearing for
P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA on March 26, 2024 in the Superstition Fire
and Medical District' s Board Room located at 565 N. Idaho Road. Please
see the attached staff report and exhibits presented to the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
At this meeting, Staff made a presentation and introduced the
preliminary recommended conditions of approval for the Planned
Development Rezoning and Major General Plan Amendment. The applicant
also made a presentation and answered questions asked by the
Commission.
Eight (8) residents of Golden Vista Resort spoke during the meeting.
Their primary concerns included:
1 . The two-story height of the development
2 . Water pressure concerns
3 . Increased density
4 . Property value concerns
5 . Maintaining commercial land
6. Increased traffic
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a second public hearing for P-
23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA on April 23, 2024 . Both Staff and the applicant
gave a presentation. Please see the attached staff report and exhibits
presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Five (5) residents spoke during the meeting. Their primary concerns
included:
1 . The two-story height of the development
2 . The desire for commercial development at this site.
3 . Increased density.
Ultimately, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend
approval of P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA, subject to the conditions of
approval that were recommended in the Staff Report, dated April 23,
2024, with the elimination of Project Specific Condition Numbers 1 &
2 .
Project Specific Condition No. 1 would have required the developer to
reserve 5 acres on the north side of Resort Boulevard to remain
commercial. Project Specific Condition No. 2 provided a list of
General Commercial Uses that would not be permitted.
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-Pz & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
The commissioners who voted in favor of the proposed development
discussed the following:
1 . The benefit of developing a historically vacant property.
2 . The benefit of adding additional rooftops .
3 . Whether this site is viable for commercial use and noted that the
approved development plan has been in existence for 20+ years and
has yet to be developed.
4 . Recent trends of commercial development.
5 . Not wanting to keep commercial property that may never develop.
The commission members who voted against the proposal discussed:
1 . The desire of an ownership product at this site as opposed to a
rental product.
2 . The lack of desire to continue changing the voter approved
General Plan.
3 . The concern of changing commercial to residential.
4 . Concerns regarding the lack of affordability with market rate
housing.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval of cases P-23-63-PZ and P-23-64-GPA
subject to the full list of conditions found within the Planning and
Zoning Commission staff report, including project specific conditions
1 and 2, which are described below:
1) Lot Numbers 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the existing Superstition Falls
Subdivision shall remain zoned General Commercial by Planned
Development ("B-1/PD") .
2) The permitted uses in the B-1 zoning district shall be those
which are permitted by Zoning Ordinance, Article 1-5, § 1-5-3:
Non-Residential Use Regulations, except that the following
uses shall not be permitted herein:
Motor vehicle dealer (new or used vehicles; and similar
uses) ;
Thrift store/used merchandise sales;
Medical marijuana facilities and dual licensees;
Swap meets;
Tattoo and/or piercing services;
Death care services/funeral homes;
Commercial parking lots and garages;
Check cashing stores;
Psychiatric and substance abuse facilities;
Nursing and residential care facilities;
Homeless shelter;
Community food and relief services;
Commercial equestrian boarding, rentals, arenas and
academies;
Cemeteries/mausoleum;
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
Scenic and sightseeing terminal/parking;
Assisted living facility;
Group care home;
Multi-family residential (including apartments,
condominiums or townhouses) ;
Similar uses designated by the Development Services
Director not conducive to the City' s and community' s goals
and objectives for successful community commercial
development.
City Council Work Session - May 6, 2024
On May 6, 2024, the City Council reviewed cases P-23-63-PZ and P-23-
64-GPA at a work session. This item was for presentation and
discussion only. The Council primarily had questions regarding the
proposed size and location of commercial zoning being recommended by
Staff, why Pinal County was opposed to the General Plan Amendment, and
details as to why surrounding residents were opposed to the project.
Major General Plan Amendment
Please note that a major general plan amendment requires a 2/3
majority vote (5 out of 7) of the Council for approval . If the general
plan amendment is not approved, the rezoning case cannot be approved.
Three motions are required:
• Major General Plan Amendment (Resolution No. 24-09)
• Planned Development Rezoning (Ordinance No. 1547 and Resolution
No. 24-08)
Attached:
- Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Reports and attachments (March 23, 2024 &
April 23, 2024)
- Resolution No. 24-09
- Ordinance No. 1547
- Resolution No. 2408
"Silveray on Goldfield" Cases P-23-63-PZ & P-23-64-GPA
May 21, 2024 - City Council Public Hearing Memo
RESOLUTION NO. 24-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, DECLARING AS A PUBLIC
RECORD THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK
AND TITLED "LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND ZONING CONDITIONS
OF CASE NO. P-23-63-PZ"; REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY.
WHEREAS, Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (hereinafter
"A.R. S . ") § 9-802 permits municipalities to enact the provisions
of a code or public record in existence without setting forth
such provisions in full text as long as the adopting ordinance
is published in full text, and one paper copy is filed with the
city clerk and an electronic copy is accessible on the city' s
website, with both made available for public use and inspection;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to A.R. S . §§ 9-801 (1) and 9-802, such
codes include zoning conditions approved in rezoning cases; and
WHEREAS, city staff has identified such provisions herein,
and it is the intent of the city to declare such documents and
compilations as public records, on file in the office of the
city clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I IN GENERAL
1 . That certain document titled the "Legal Descriptions and
zoning conditions of case no. P-23-63-PZ", of which at
least one paper copy is on file with the city clerk and one
electronic copy is accessible on the city' s website
(www.apachejunctionaz .gov) , is hereby declared to be a
public record, and shall be made available for public use
and inspection.
SECTION II REPEALING ANY CONFLICTING PROVISIONS
All resolutions and parts of resolutions in conflict with the
provisions of this resolution or any part of the codes adopted
herein, are hereby repealed.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-08
PAGE 1 OF 2
SECTION III PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, phrase, clause or portion
of this resolution or any part of the codes or regulations
adopted herein is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA, THIS DAY OF f 2024 .
SIGNED AND ATTESTED TO THIS DAY OF 2024 .
WALTER "CHIP" WILSON
Mayor
ATTEST:
JENNIFER PENA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RICHARD JOEL STERN
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 24-08
PAGE 2 OF 2
City of Apache Junction, Arizona 300 E Superstition
Boulevard
Agenda Item Cover Sheet Apache Junction,AZ 85119
Agenda Item No. 15.
File ID: 24-434
Sponsor: Liz Langenbach Agenda Date:5/21/2024
Index: In Control: City Council Meeting
Presentation, discussion, and possible adoption of the Rodeo Grounds Event Center
Master Plan.
City of Apache Junction,Arizona Page 1 Printed on 511612024
City of Apache Junction
' Home of the Superstition Mountains
DATE: May 8, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Bryant Powell, City Manager
Matt Busby, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Liz Langenbach, Parks & Recreation Director
David Butler, Parks Superintendent
SUBJECT: Rodeo Grounds Master Plan Update
The original Rodeo Grounds Master Plan was adopted in 2006. Since that time, only the
first phase was implemented: restrooms and covered grandstands. Since purchasing the
rodeo grounds in June 2023, the Parks and Recreation Department has been working
with J2 Engineering & Design ("J2") to solicit public feedback, conduct stakeholder
meetings, and draft an update to the original plan.
The draft was presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission and at a public Open
House on February 7t", 2024 and the updated draft was presented to city council on April
15, 2024.
The estimated probable cost is approximately $23,000,000 and can be broken into as
many phases as desired/needed. The recommended phasing plan allows for
construction to take place without interrupting other future phases. It also allows for
incremental growth in events and activities as funds become available.
Staff respectfully recommend adoption of the master plan concept by city council.
Once the master plan has been approved, phasing can be finalized based on funding
and immediate needs.
PARKS & RECREATION
April. 21, 2024
Y
i�k
rr ra"
m
u m
:i
r
j
n"
v: k "z.,
s �u'�
ll'�:'
Nv�
7,w
ur ,
fi
u
k„ L
r.
t
u.r
r r 4
nr lttr
} h
s§
u
Y
2
" t
t}
I j
f !"
T � i+
t is
,t
s
P,{
t i
i
s t
f �(
RODEO EVENT CENTER
MASTER PLAN UPDATE
k"{,.
, r r
ti
i"
Y
l t t ...... .. ..,.„ ,, "tti} :n;�txi .m •^'".� t:, t, x= 4 .+r",_„,
..... .,. r cr:
.
.IG
Al
t
t r t # t r
f, t
t
Y £ i
r i }
r'.
r 4} 14
r If Y:I t Y
x S
a )
lr f 1
ry r r t t t �1 4ir£
tr ,r 4t
tY
z tr,i
r }t
h I r,
t E4+k,
c Igj.t,
e°
Y�x {3
*Yl ini }
w(
1is ? s b
RODEO EVENT CENTER BACK6
WINr£..............
> �
1986 - Ci too over t e B (Burv^au� tease
� i
oRecreation and Public Pulspose Act �iowed development and usefree
ofprohibitedm� ri
o c a a but co e c al use
U
2006 - Original Adopted
t
{ une - Purchaser r was finalize
20 ace o e
l
r s
r .
commercial use
��jllft�yl SY
rt
7 .
}}� � ct er 621023 - Ro eo Groun s Ce a ration - transfer of "ke s
� y
r�fr�':f�}tt�;tis rl
� ��rt r3 ijti l J r
S i f1 r
mBIM to Ci or & Kicked-oiltiepublic-inputprocess ror the master
�
{{{ u date
...................................
r{
4
Y�x {3
*Yl ini }
w(
1is ? s b
RODEO EVENT CENTER BACKG
EWWIN...............
'r£ > �
November 14211t13 - Event Planners Stake-holder Meeting h
artJ2 Engineering & Design
0 0 0
• Staff and City Counci sessions conducted to deu. elop and review
ra of master plan
t
{ {
i r
Presentednow d"aOpena r�ua 7,, 20-.24 - at and
to e Parks & Recreation Commission
sm�
{
rfl 15, 20-24- Presentedfinal d planCityto}
cfl
8 YS
{
law
��p'!Iv, T T"',
110",,
JQMKT— 1,
0hr I
KA.p... 1"M
of
two
01
Ole?
jummkik MOM wow, ---Vy xg,jm
El IN,
win
Mpg
1:4 ��Rt
goo"wo an
WWI-M",
omit V&SM sox
...........
vwv-a
01 � , 1 vt
n lop jr
WAS
'am
d RIO dh,
JR. , 7� " " " 01 y
TV
F"ENO
DAMPS
ATIMI"A coup ."Am"0 AQ
mom%
01 -00�.Uw- AS"WA, own 0
to Hh',"�,"'Vovh . by I I — - ,, m AWN
A
gum
tu,'L�!
V! NEW 0
MR,
:soup
00 N WE
r r r r r
rt{„ r t,'C , �" t,. S k� 2 ! u tnr•wxrtJ r}l,.,
}ti�`4a• '�`','Y' er =2� Y',�}x t }�"' t #Y � �, r }'
r
t,r3
n
,k ! r.s }.}`:•. ;^i' $,,." }Y} qt} ? $7�}t S wi��l n!yr} t r`�i{}; F= t t?t+=,.� a tt�=rst s, }t�k"'`' 7 r,
N'' $ t�' �• „ $r t,;� z a �Sf� et Y } r�{'�$fi t'
y ii s � 5rta t£ 5 i 147 r3 �£
4
` $nz "; t•,��r
r Y
w
$}t �:'=o �';;�; ,:Y,4 {£ s l t rJt.,,,.,t ft$ .lt�: ,»;:Ht ?�s t'�' �;its xt� r£w •,•D„� x}
r'
}r, , a
! t 4
n.
.:..t; „aFR4i .,,. ?,.} 1;�z, ,.5 ,.,., ,,,, },. „r,;,: �# R •S. .e.,;fi: �}rbr} „ .,ki't p
,,,r. ., �. .,,,•,£}U.J.tf {ti£}...,.ry Q: r.,,:,1 ,:. .}F :, ..•.. ,} {S,�rk �$„ �; t r t t 7 t !'4 t t
1, EEn",,.n , t :,.,<t r,,: .t ., t{t .f ,v. ,<....,, �.., r ,,, o.. {„ ,. •, t. � .n,..
".,. .,.. .4 J} n, ,. ., r t%7 1 4. ft ;.tt i v, tr' 't'. <.. ,... 3, , •.. ,...• ,n .t} t ,.. , rS ,., t ,. t
3„»;,. .•. , ., ,. 1. r ,:, r .,. ,,..». „t,trt,, ::,,,.. <.. i s:: ",r, r, »,t „r, r �,: ,:. rt. :, ,, r ...r",•:tF 4t tYt. ..,..} rtt,,:," :,t
,.. lk1.. >. ,. ,tr„>, ","!, .., rt:••.. :, �:- ,r=4.,, :.s }' r. .. }. 4 ,•rl,. "v" 3�YSS,3:,Y}.. ,7< zt r£ i'�
�f;
.• r „'. _;,. t.rt" to '¢ >}
rr stk. ,r. r" .� •, ',
,... ,f ,
LOW
t {, }rttrti2 r i i
}Sr=r
e :,{$:.� 1�7,}F}{ tR}IJ .}. ki. �'t, 1}F�� �.r..•tt ,..r$ }u
wt �t t•
s4 3 I ,j
f+» 4-r JJ.,.
3 S
}r
i trd t t
}
Y' t
Fr
n
`ri ;'n, { i. <£{ {' ,pg; .rf t•,r{"r, i
j• i��.=. { t .{twr far, '$ zr' ,t t±� �\ sy{Yr =,g;;� rwi£r ,f 2{: �J`=" wr
V
S t t
�tr
Vy C
7 Y,.Y�
t;
f(r:; Y t" _ t�t€`•±1, r 4< ¢t!'{`; ,`��` lowtl,,"t t' t i, tx „�<'»rrz ,i;• <
T {Y' �`"}'Yak• f$ia ty;n, t�Y ,<.'
r,
4
i t #
w ow
t z L "i `
{
r}„ ,}[ �.tnS $Ji,S,� 's•S :" t'R't`,"4�tr{ � .t '1 ,
rt k
•,fit � 'a`9 �Y
f"
ss
t
tt
. ;:,",:.,,.. ;„r t :, ?Y'°;,, .„ :� �,., "; ,, » _ ,,: ,,.,,,lS.�. w s' °"kf}2 t•: r r,„ 't
r "xt
y 1 !„•,t{? s,, t,.t (N 7 tss,. ,tr �!},,r ! �€ r St a
r.
t ,r
r
r. .,t" r t � r„}5 a»... ,:. , r., „r ". ,,.. rt =. ,t ., ..•. , �:., .., ,,. r. .. � >~• ., ,,, .,.: ..4 :. .4 ... .,, ir,...,. rr, ,. <r.., 5. t ,,,,., r. ,). f'. t s "„ r. f..t r• , F. � ,a ..,:... �. , , „ ,,,. r.. rr,a ... ,,
,:.rv, r ,t, n, 4 », ,.,1, „r,. „,t.,..,," su.;. , u'.,.s ..u,: ::,,,,: .,.. .} r,Y � ,.,5 + ,. u" r� , wY:.. ., t• a.,..•�..,; r.} c1r,
r,rwr,=€r ,$„ , ., ,it}},.. �, .. r. r ,. ,,..: ri»u}'r;,j �{;rt�. n, rzrt5 r,��Q���{r}�2�5{r#it�`k�. rrre�� >• `�
r rcav }r •. r � r r ,}
,::, ,.•. „r,r r., tl;. , , ..,, r„ ;. ,:; " ' jr,e� r } '.c<" ,{.,. r. "?;; ;i�,<: } ;r
., , ". r"..�n, ry r �r ,.r �,� ,. f,.. .£ :v f.r �x� r, fi. », x=„,r. '.a, r ,., r „ ., cr =;•,.
x
? f
i
r, r
2.» ,5 r,_ •',: ",r, ,, ,, ry , , r., ,7 i.. , .n Yt+ , .... F Z ,... ..,, z..
3t:.. ::=s. .. , , s, t „•, ,. ., r ,..E , 3 r .4 r } ,..., r<„ .r.. ..•.,.
9
,.2 , ! :. � ..: r s�, }, ,•." rr" ;G ,:" ,. a <. F, ,. .,.,,r i= .,r
x » ry f'.,rv» .. -,�, i, ,r ,. ., ,: „y`� 7 a. .# .t ', t .•.. '"r=: _ , s, ., w,.. ,4r, .,... .n
„ ,.� ....,„ •
}
al
•,i.. ,t.2, r L :•r. « .. ., ...r .,.. .,.,. ,'•:-=s ...: z , ,,,e. .: v.., t,SSi, ^s „ >t. tr, ,.,. t} t„t1 Srr..w.tP
a r, r„r
,., ,. ,, .»,.>a ,: .., „ ,' ry ... ,'r„J,.,>. •L.rs,,; ., _' } r
FI ,>..
„.,
� t.
"m V;�15,TV
;,,,,'W 41�
S �Ail
""Pu
RYV� f
VIQ
X
V
ow
"OF
*�T 'i
IWO
j
P
g4w
PI
4P�,!AAAU�,,,ollrooi
R,
A",
.............
F
"'W
I=1 31 101
NEE=
�',,`l",Pfdodt4d Sleac
nnou,ne lift
PWO
4$0
hdd6,`,Stk f6�
ernpordq�
�`N
e"
XRM"
'd E- t"s
propo$ed q von pace ,
Weather
lRostroo
"MA
pp"IrIM"',
0:,si 4 d6 it it
la,
HIR�illl':Ill'i -qln,
4L,
4M
AWN a
b
ft ow
MESA
01, Dosed
ft, "g,
7-
C d"Stalit""Ill",
0 0 (60)`,,`,,,q
"'Al ��Xij
qjnton
tj 1f� t�l � ✓ } r t �. t F s , s
u r
rt'
£
tr
J
tr s hk`
p
t $
{it
F
{
,
,
i
t"
t
.,,, r .�, }d k t~: Ys,. rs,...}. ,,„ -, „:r,s. .,•.,, ,, ,,,Lf7 1 n t ,,a,rtj,t t$,. 5��'- t 5 ;e;? t. n
t '
Event SpaC@ Stag@ Shade Structure Shade!Structure Events
e,'• tr� � S`td ,
34 j
x '
t= { r ttt a j#i� t ' {fy :5 ✓ � t: 1t7 l ttkk3 f�S ,,,,,,.
Y r4 X�
s 3
�tr
"
,e
f,{y
yr, t
{ b
Y✓(
a
rr
.r
P
Event Sp Stage EVent Space/Stage Events { r }
��t r Events JI
r; silt ?tt�t�'S3x}t
„7 t
xy�rrra
{}
r
5
y
r
r
E�k
� 2
*
s
r,,;it rt t S,✓r r...t lt. r < 4, } k S= ,t, f t s tt
Mom
, ✓ "a }S. - t r ,t�: t{rrs>?;'vjq,r, FT t, '..4r,3s „?`t,:,,' t rs ¢+ t3 £ tt#^ F
� +� �. �rrdrrit�trrwf{trt '� � � t #fr}1;
Gcvered le Cher �fi Announcer Booth Covered Stalls Covered Stalls
t ,ate.,,„,
tt/yyyCt� 3y
it t�jT t�STAFF RECOMMENDATIO
y rtyf}tri�t�it �`+��
14 L1��
4 {i
ry#f
}
�s
Staff respectfully ."ecom-m--end council adoption of the In Rodeo
Master Plan concept.
Event
Upon adoption, staff Will workwzt city management and city
rt7t r t council to determine phasing of all p based on funding.
rrr{� i
i t
tt{tt r r t�
�tz�ti�{sty t
Ott;fi#rtt yl it t
�� ���t�t1 tty j}} t
t(r4l rjyyl
�{��t��5�44y81fY14 ,y t
2 `
t
t � 4
i
ryr�i tr{}r: 4
i
r�
� r
t
�Ek 1r tv,ya
�, �,,,
y�:
i i
li
� � r
i
I
i
r
CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLL CALL Date: /��a�` !!l ail a / ` �s�QTC y;7
S�fS
Work Study ."-. ,Regular Special 5/ail
S: � E:�",53 S:�I;00 E:9�yl S:' af��E:�%�D �°�`�.
CITY COUNCIL: Present Ab/excu Present Ab/excu Present Ab/excu ;d fp
MAYOR WILSON
VICE MAYOR SCHROEDER ,I�/
COUNCILMEMBER CROSS t/ V / 1✓/
COUNCILMEMBER HECK
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON 1Z
COUNCILMEMBER NESSER v v
COUNCILMEMBER SOLLER
TOTAL 1fy 61 Ll
CITY STAFF: Present Ab/excu Present Ab/excu Present Ab/excu, /
City Manager Bryant Powell V/ i/ 7/
Assistant City Manager Matt Busby ✓ t/
City Clerk Jennifer Pena /
City Attorney Joel Stern V V
Information Technology Director
Doug Wirthgen
4xu-b' e-- rA C
Public Safety Director Michael Pooley V
Dev Services Director Rudy Esquivias
PW Director Ted Wolff
Parks& Rec Director Liz Langenbach
ED Director Patrick Ainsworth
Library Director Pam Harrison
Finance Director Angelie Hawley
HR Director Anna McCray
Water District Director Mike Loggins V
Municipal Ju ge A. Doug LaSota f�
OTHERS:
Deputy City Clerk Evie McKinney
.Planning anager Sidney Urias
Building&Saf ty Mngr Adrian Alegria
AM Senior Planner E�e
Planner P ' C( { eWey �
-Pla ner Nick Leftwich
PW Project Engineer Raquel Schatz
City Engineer Emile Schmid
S1,tenlipky tc�;& Forms\Ball Call t c i ,� .doer i ,° F r '. ��
ce v1 Vn i Ci f. �►�.c,P�-��t e�^� ►/
City Council
VOTE - ROLL CALL
I- - MEETING
ITEM # OF
MOTION BY: - SECONDED BY:
NOTES:
YES NO ABSTAINED
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCILMEMBER SOLLER
VICE MAYOR SCHROEDER V
COUNCILMEMBER NESSER
COUNCILMEMBER CROSS v.1
COUNCILMEMBER HECK
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON
MAYOR WILSON
TOTAL
UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
Vote sheet 1
S:/5—Templates&Forms/Vote Call—City Council
City Council
VOTE - ROLL CALL
ITEM # �r' 3� MEETING OF
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: l /
NOTES: f1 D01 e-0 LZ �(nn N 1�/I otiS e+� Pf a&i uf& d --�
YES NO ABSTAINED
CITY COUNCIL:
COUNCILMEMBER NESSER
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON
COUNCILMEMBER CROSS
COUNCILMEMBER HECK
COUNCILMEMBER SOLLER
VICE MAYOR SCHROEDER
MAYOR WILSON
TOTAL
UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
Vote sheet 2
S:/5—Templates&Forms/Vote Call—City Council
City Council
VOTE,- ROLL CALL
ITEM # ' a��y 2.� MEETING OF a
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: `r
NOTES: lut 4t91,
YES NO ABSTAINED
CITY COUNCIL:
COUNCILMEMBER SOLLER
COUNCILMEMBER NESSER
COUNCILMEMBER CROSS
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON V
VICE MAYOR SCHROEDER V
COUNCILMEMBER HECK V
MAYOR WILSON
r
TOTAL rA 0-4
UNANIMOUS IN FAVOR OPPOSED ABSTAINED
TOTAL
Vote sheet 3
S:/5—Templates&Forms/Vote Call—City Council
Date: '7 CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM
Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk PRIOR to the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda.
I would like to speak on Agenda Item #:
I would like to speak on a Non-Agenda matter regarding: /
Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? Yes-),;,Z No Only If Necessary
I am in favor of the proposed Item. 1 am opposed to the proposed Item.
First Name Last Name
(PRINT)
Address V City Zip Code
e
Telephone Email address
This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council
when called up to speak at the podium.
Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have-a five minute limit.
Consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded:
as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said
minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting. I further understand that this activity may,be
audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the
likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the internet video stream showing their participation. A.R.S. § 1-602 (A)(9)_
Signs ure of Paren Guardian Me
08/26/2019
Date:J CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM
Please fill out completely and return to the City Clerk PRIOR to-the conclusion of the City Manager's Report portion of the agenda.
I would like to speak on Agenda Item #:
I would like to speak on a Non-Agenda matter regarding:
Do you wish to speak before Council on this item? Yes No Only If Necessary
V I am in favor of the proposed Item. I am opposed to the proposed Item. -
First Nam Last-Name
(PRINT)
N7�_� fVZ
3�oo K) -��()A aw KZF--
Address City Zip Code
Li�P� � �� o 1 , coy,
Telephone Email ad ess
This information will be used by staff for follow-up, if necessary. Speakers shall make comments directly to the Mayor and City Council
when called up to speak at the podium.
Note: Call to the Public comments have a three minute limit and Public Hearing comments have a five minute limit.
Consent for Minor to be Audio and/or Video Recorded:
I, , as the parent/guardian of (minor(s)), a minor(s), agree to allow said
minor(s) to appear and/or participate in the City of Apache Junction City Council Meeting. I further understand that this activity may be
audio and/or video recorded and I hereby consent to the minor being audio and/or video recorded during his/her participation with the
likelihood that their image will appear on cable TV and the'internet video stream showing their participation. A.R.S. § 1-602 (A)(9).
Signature of Parent/Guardian Date
08/26/2019